Fiscal Year 1981 0US yCop of Eneeeer 9m 0 * - a * * *f A ,,ARnne ol rt Y r FY 1981 Statistical Highlights ITEM APPROPRIATIONSE ($ Millions) New Work 3 Navigation ................................... Flood Control Total ......................... .... Flood Control Mississippi River and Tributaries ................ Multipurpose. including power ...................... Beach Erosion Control ........................... Total New Work .................................. Other Work' .................... ........ ........ T OT A .. ................................... NAVIGATION (Calendar Year)* Ton-Miles of Commerce (Millions) Foreign, Coastal Ports .............................. Foreign, Great Lakes Ports ........... ............ Domestic, Coastal (Intraterritory not com piled) ................ ...... ....... Domestic. Great Lakes .......... .... ... ....... Domestic. Inland .............................. D om estic, Local .................................... T ( T A L ............... ..................... Tons of Commerce (Millions) Foreign Coastal Ports ............................ Foreign, Great Lakes Ports ............ ........... Domestic. Coastal and Intra-territory .............. Domestic, Great Lakes ........... ... ........ Dom estic. Inland ................................. Dom estic, IL cal .................................. T O T A L ........................................ FLOOD DAMAGES PREVENTED ($ Billions) ........... POWER Installed (Cumulative in millions of kw) .............. Generated (Billions of kwh) ..................... .. .. RESERVOIR STORAGE (Millions of acre-feet) A ll Purtx ses ........................ Flood Control (Maximum) ....................... Water Supply .................................... Irrigation. ..................................... .. PUBLIC ATTENDANCE AT RESERVOIRS (Millions of visitor days, calendar years) ............. 1981 1980 1979 1978 1977 1976 1975 1974 1973 1972 607 485 395 357 261 358 221 193 264 212 772 873 802 895 859 1,004 580 650 631 469 (145) (211) (158) (1881 (173)R (158) (122) (212) 6 (77) (53) 275 538 358 455 464 479 287 288 379 390 12 9 12 12 16 10 10 3 3 4 1.666 1.905 1,567 1,719 1,600 1,851 1,098 1,134 1,277 1.075 1,331 1,296 1.223 1,070 887 992 659 636 675 514 2,997 3.201 2,790 2.789 2.487 2,843 1.757 1,770 1,952 1,589 59,940.5 58,925.6 58,925.1 50,979.6 43.521.7 44,019.1 40,406.4 31.389.8 43,146.4 42,108.8 37.734.3 34.347.9 29.944.8 26,800.0 41,400.0 35.087.1 532,290.3 540.373.2 343.536.6 322.932.3 315,845.9 322,802.2 327,649.2 351,508.6 77,971.9 76,284.0 52,416.9 70,684.2 68,516.8 78,880.4 83,765.1 73,131.6 217,090.2 209,266.2 201.784.2 197,072.8 180,399.2 183,202.6 171,890.9 177,538.6 1,710.2 1,339.8 1.262.3 1.164.2 1,222.3 1,460.1 1,386.3 1,363.7 931,846.4 928,297.6 692,527.4 677,181.0 639,450.7 656,164.3 666,497.9 670,019.6 919.7 875.5 886.1 790.3 691.8 712.6 700.6 569.8 73.8 70.6 69.2 65.7 56.9 515 66.8 60.1 308.7 308.6 251.7 239.2 234.8 237.4 235.1 244.5 143.6 142.7 109.1 132.1 129.3 146.1 156.6 145.0 535.0 528.7 524.0 524.0 503.9 511.0 503.2 507.0 93.1 89.5 83.4 83.7 78.3 88.2 93.2 90.3 2,.073.9 2.021.4 1.908.2 1,832.1 1,692.2 1.742.7 1,757.3 1,614.9 1.2 7.3 19.4 6.3 2.6 1.7 15.9 13.0W 11.9" 2.3 19.2" 19.0' 19.0' 17.9 16.4 16.0 14.9 14.4 14.0 13.0 77.3 77.8 81.2 83.6 64.0 108.0 82.9 76.8 71.1 72.8 268.5 263.3 263.3 262.9 252.0 250.6 248.3 244.6 243.3 234.0 122.7 120.4 120.4 120.1 104.0 102.9 101.0 99.2 98.7 91.3 9.1 8.9 7.8 7.7 7.6 7.3 7.2 6.8 6.5 6.4 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8 6,8 5.8 469 457 449 439 424 391 376 352 344 328 1. Includes FY 1976 and 1976T (Transition Quarter); figures cover period 7. Operation and maintenance, surveys, administration and miscellaneous. from 1 July 1975 through 30 September 1976. 8. $102 million deferred in FY82. 2. Includes amounts expended on deferred-for-restudy, abandoned, or super- 9. Includes New Melones and Snettisham, built by the Corps and operated seded projects. by others. 3. Advance engineering and design, and construction. *For further information on waterborne commerce, see Waterborne Commerce (Including major rehabilitation projects). of the United States, published annually. It may be obtained by writing the 4. Savings and slippage applied to projects. District Engineer, U.S. Army Engineer District, New Orleans, P O. Box 5. Included in Flood Control. 60267, New Orleans, Louisiana 70160, 6. Revised figure. For sale by the Superintendent of Documents. U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 CONTENTS Page NEW ENGLAND DIVISION .............................................................................. 1-1 NORTH ATLANTIC DIVISION: New York, N.Y., District ..................... ........................ ............................... ... 2-1 Philadelphia, Pa., District ........................................ 3-1 Baltimore, Md., District ............................................................... 4-1 N orfolk, Va., D istrict ..................................................................................... 5-1 SOUTH ATLANTIC DIVISION: Wilmington, N.C., District ...................................................... , ........ 6-1 Charleston, S.C., District ....................................... 7-1 Savannah, Ga., D istrict .............. ........................................................... .......... 8-1 Jacksonville, Fla., District ........................... ................... ...................... ............ 9-1 M obile, A la., D istrict ................................................................................ .. .... 10-1 LOWER MISSISSIPPI VALLEY DIVISION: New Orleans, La., District ..................... ................................... .................. 11-1 Vicksburg, Miss., District ...................................... 12-1 Memphis, Tenn., District ........................................... ................................... 13-1 St. Louis, Mo., District ................................................................................... .. 14-1 SOUTHWESTERN DIVISION: Galveston, Tex., District ....................................... 15-1 Fort Worth, Tex., District ............................................................... 16-1 Albuquerque, N .M ex., District ............................................................................ 17-1 Little Rock, Ark., District ........................................ 18-1 Tulsa, Okla., D istrict ................................................................................ ...... 19-1 MISSOURI RIVER DIVISION: Kansas City, Mo., District ............................................................. 20-1 Omaha, Nebr., District .................................................................................... 21-1 OHIO RIVER DIVISION: Ohio River ........................ ............................................ 22-1 Nashville, Tenn., District .......................................... .. .................. 23-1 Louisville, Ky., District ............................................................................ 24-1 Huntington, W.Va., District ............................................................................... 25-1 Pittsburgh, Pa., District ................................................................................... 26-1 NORTH CENTRAL DIVISION: St. Paul, M inn., District ................. ................................................ ....................... 27-1 Rock Island, Ill., District ........................................ 28-1 Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, Minn. .......................................... 29-1 Chicago, Ill., District ................................................................ 30-1 Detroit, M ich., District .................................................................................... 31-1 Buffalo,N.Y. ....................................................................... 32-1 SOUTH PACIFIC DIVISION: Los A ngeles, Calif., D istrict ............................................................................... 33-1 San Francisco, Calif., District .............................................................................. 34-1 Sacram ento, Calif., District ................................................................................ 35-1 PACIFIC OCEAN DIVISION ............................................................................. 36-1 NORTH PACIFIC DIVISION: Portland, Oreg., District ................................................................................ 37-1 Seattle, W ash., District ......................................... ....................................... 38-1 Walla Walla, Wash., District .............................................................................. 39-1 Alaska District ................................................ ...........................................- 40-1 Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors .................................................................. 41-1 Mississippi River Commission ................ 422--1....................................... Coastal Engineering Research Center........................................................................43-1 California Debris Commission ............................................................................... 44-1 Waterways Experiment Station ........................................... ............. 45-1 Permanent International Association of Navigation Congresses ........................... .............. 46-1 Investigations of Projects Under Federal Power Act ................................................... 47-1 Regulatory and Sunken Vessel Removal Activities .......................... .............. 48-1 International Boundary Waters Boards .............................. ........................... 49-1 Construction Engineering Research Laboratory ....................................................... 50-1 Engineer Topographic Laboratories .................... ........................... .............. 51-1 Cold Regions Research Engineering Laboratory......................... ... ........................... 52-1 Water Resources Support Center ................................. 53-1 APPENDICES: Flood Control Reservoirs Operable September 30, 1981 .......................... .. .............. A-1 Flood Control Projects Under Construction During Fiscal Year 1981 .................................... B-1 Navigation Locks and Dams Operable September 30, 1981 ........................ .............. C -1 Navigation Projects Under Construction September 30, 1981 ............... ...................... D-1 Multipurpose Projects Including Power In Operation September 30, 1981 ............... ............... E-1 Multipurpose Projects Including Power Under Construction September 30, 1981 ............................. F-1 Flood Damages Prevented (By Region and by District) .......................................... G-1 IN D E X .................................................................................................... I -1 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION* The New England Division, an operating division with both district and division functions, comprises all of New England except western Vermont and small portions of Massachusetts and Connecticut along their western boundaries, and includes small portions of southeastern New York, all embraced in the drainage basins tributary to Long Island Sound and the Atlantic Ocean east of the New York-Connecticut State line. It also includes Fishers Island, N.Y. IMPROVEMENTS Beach Erosion Control 1. Andrews River, Mass .. ...................... 1-2 2. Aquatic Plant Control ... .................... 1-2 3. Boston Harbor, Mass ........................ 1-2 4. Bridgeport Harbor, Conn ..................... 1-3 5. Bristol Harbor, R.I ............ ............. 1-3 6. Cape Cod Canal, Mass ....................... 1-3 7. Chatham (Stage) Harbor, Mass. ............... 1-4 8. Clinton Harbor, Conn ......................... 1-4 9. Connecticut River Below Hartford, Conn ............................... 1-4 10. Corea Harbor, Gouldsboro, Me ................. 1-5 11. Fall River Harbor, Mass ...................... 1-5 12. Fore River, Braintree, Weymouth, Mass. ............................. 1-5 13. Gloucester Harbor, Mass. ...................... 1-5 14. Green Harbor, Mass. ........................... 1-6 15. Guilford Harbor, Conn. ........................ 1-6 16. Hampton Harbor, N.H. ........................ 1-6 17. Island End River, Chelsea, Mass. ............... 1-6 18. Jonesport Harbor, Me. ..................... 1-7 19. Kennebec River, Me ......................... 1-7 20. Kennebunk River, Me ........................ 1-8 21. Menemsha Creek, Martha's Vineyard, Mass. ..... .......................... 1-8 22. Milford Harbor, Conn. .......................... 1-8 23. New Haven Harbor, Conn .................... 1-8 24. Newburyport Harbor, Mass ................... 1-9 25. Norwalk Harbor, Conn......................... 1-9 26. Portland Harbor, Me........................ 1-9 27. Portsmouth Harbor and Piscataqua River, Me. and N.H. .......................... 1-9 28. Sakonnet Harbor, R.I. ....................... 1-9 29. Sesuit Harbor, Mass. ........................... 1-10 30. Wellfleet Harbor, Mass ...................... 1-10 31. Reconnaissance and condition surveys ................................ 1-10 32. Other authorized navigation projects .................................... 1-11 33. Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (Preauthorization) ........ :.................... 1-11 34. Authorized bridge alteration .................. 1-11 35. 36. 37. 38. 39. 40. 40A. 41. 42. 43. 43A. 43B. 43C. 43D. 43E. 43F. 43G. 43H. 43I. 43J. 43K. 43L. 43M. 43N. 430. 43P. 43Q. 43R. Oakland Beach, Warwick, R.I. ................. 1-11 Revere Beach, Mass. ........................... 1-11 Inspection of completed beach erosion control projects ......................... 1-11 Other authorized beach erosion control projects .............. .. .............. 1-11 Beach erosion control activities pursuant to Section 103, Public Law 87-874 (Preauthorization) ................... 1-11 Flood Control Blackstone River Basin, Mass. and R.I. ............. .................... 1-11 West Hill Dam, Mass. ...................... 1-12 Charles River Dam, Mass. .................... 1-12 Charles River (Natural Valley Storage Areas), Mass. ........................ 1-12 Connecticut River Basin, Vt., N.H., Mass. and Conn. ....................... 1-12 Ball Mountain Lake, Vt ...................... 1-13 Barre Falls Dam, Mass. ......................... 1-13 Birch Hill Dam, Mass ........................ 1-13 Colebrook River Lake, Conn. .................. 1-13 Conant Brook Dam, Mass. .................... 1-13 Knightville Dam, Mass ....................... 1-14 Lancaster, Israel River, N.H. .................. 1-14 Littleville Lake, Mass ......................... 1-14 North Hartland Lake, Vt. ...................... 1-14 North Springfield Lake, Vt. .................... 1-14 North Stratford, N.H .......................... 1-15 Otter Brook Lake, N.H. ........................ 1-15 Park River, Hartford, Conn. .................... 1-15 Salmon River, Colchester, Conn. ............... 1-15 Surry Mountain Lake, N.H ................... 1-15 Townshend Lake, Vt ........................... 1-16 Tully Lake, Mass. .............. .............. 1-16 Union Village Dam, Vt. ......................... 1-16 *All cost and financial statements and authorizing legislation for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 1-1 Navigation Page REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 Flood Control (cont.) Page 44. Housatonic River Basin, Conn. ............... 1-16 44A. Black Rock Lake, Conn..................... 1-16 44B. Hancock Brook Lake, Conn.................. 1-16 44C. Hop Brook Lake, Conn................ 1-17 44D. Housatonic River, Pittsfield Mass ............. 1-17 44E. Housatonic River, Salisbury, Conn ............ 1-17 44F. Housatonic River, Sheffield, Mass............... 1-17 44G. Northfield Brook Lake, Conn ................. 1-17 44H. Squantz Pond, New Fairfield, Conn.............. 1-18 441. Thomaston Dam, Conn ......................... 1-18 45. Merrimack River Basin, N.H. and M ass...................................... ... 1-18 45A. Blackwater Dam, N.H ....................... 1-18 45B. Edward MacDowell Lake, N.H................ 1-18 45C. Franklin Falls Dam, N.H........................ 1-18 45D. Hopkinton-Everett Lakes, N.H............... 1-19 45E. North Nashua River, Mass. ................... 1-19 45F. Phillips Lake, Mass ....................... 1-19 46. New Bedford, Fairhaven, and Acushnet, Mass ............ ............... 1-19 47. New London, Conn ............................ 1-20 48. Saint John River Basin, Me. ................... 1-20 48A. Dickey-Lincoln School Lakes, Me ............... 1-20 49. 50. 50A. 50B. 50C. 50D. 50E. 50F. 51. 52. 53. 54. 55. 56. 57. 58. Stamford, Conn. ............................... 1-20 Thames River Basin, Conn., R.I. and Mass. .................................. 1-21 Buffumville Lake, Mass. ........................ 1-21 East Brimfield Lake, Mass. ..................... 1-21 Hodges Village Dam, Mass. ..................... 1-21 Mansfield Hollow Lake, Conn................ 1-21 West Thompson Lake, Conn. ............ . .... 1-21 Westville Lake, Mass ........................ 1-22 Inspection of completed flood control projects ................................ 1-22 Flood control reservoir operations ............. 1-22 Hurricane barrier operations .................... 1-23 Other authorized flood control projects ....... .............................. 1-23 Flood control work under special authorization ................................ 1-23 Deauthorized Projects .......................... 1-23 General Investigations Surveys .... .................. ............. 1-23 Collection and Study of Basic Data ............... 1-23 Navigation 1. ANDREWS RIVER, MASS. Location. On Nantucket Sound within town of Harwich, Massachusetts, about 84 miles southeast of Boston, Massachusetts. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 257.) Existing project. Channel 6 feet deep, 75 feet wide, extending about 2,900 feet from deep water in Nantucket Sound to a public marina, two jetties on east and west sides of harbor entrance, and 3-acre maneuvering and anchorage basin. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully Complied with. Terminal facilities. None. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Hired labor costs in the amount of $12,600 were incurred for surveys and inspection for maintenance dredging work. A total of 6,000 cubic yards of material were removed from the entrance channel. Total contract costs were $69,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. East jetty completed in June 1967. Dredging was completed in April 1968. Construction of west jetty completed in May 1973. 2. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL. Location. The program is conducted in all navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels and associated waters under the New England Division jurisdiction. Existing project. The purpose of the program is to eradicate or control aquatic plants that are causing or have the potential to cause major economic problems in the above waterways. The plant control is done in the interest of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, public health and research. The program is administered by the Chief of Engineers, under the direction of the Secretary of the Army, and in cooperation with other Federal and State agencies. Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute 30 percent of the cost of controlling the aquatic plants, and in addition must hold the United States free from damages that may occur from control operations. Operations and results during fiscal year. The office received many requests from communities to help with their aquatic plant problems. Field surveys and meetings with local people were held to determine the extent and cause of the problems. In most cases, the problems resulted from excess nutrients washing into the waters from adjacent lands. This problem does not meet the criteria for Corps participation. Condition at end of fiscal year. The Aquatic Plant Control program is limited to reconnaissance surveys of New England waters. Appropriate coordination will continue in the new fiscal year. 3. BOSTON HARBOR, MASS. Location. Harbor includes all expanse of tide-water lying within a line from Point Allerton to Point Shirley and extending from that line westward to mainland. This comprises an area of about 47 square miles, exclusive of the islands. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 246 and 248.) Previous project. For details see Annual Reports for 1915, 1917, 1938. Existing project. The existing project for Boston Harbor, adopted in 1825 and supplemented by enactments through 1958, provides for the improvement of the harbor proper and its approaches. Fort Point Channel, Reserved Channel, Chelsea River and Weir River. For a more detailed description see page 3 of Annual Report for 1974. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing projects.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 1-2 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION* Terminal facilities. There are 156 wharves and piers in harbor, not including Mystic, Weymouth Fore, and Town Rivers, which are reported elsewhere. Of the terminals, 28 are publicly owned, 13 are open to public use, 73 have mechanical-handling facilities, and 70 have railroad connections. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. For a full description of channel facilities in Chelsea River refer to House Document 350, 87th Congress, 2d session (See Port Series No. 3, Part 2, Port of Boston, Mass., dated 1967). Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Hired labor costs of $13,500 and contract costs of $61,072 were incurred for sampling and testing work and preparation of plans and specifications in connection with proposed maintenance dredging of the Presidents Roads anchorage and the Chelsea and Mystic River Channels. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was completed in May 1966 with the construction of Chelsea River 35-foot channel and maneuvering basin. That portion of Fort Point Channel from northeasterly side of Summer Street Highway bridge to the easterly side of Dorchester Highway Bridge has been abandoned pursuant to P.L. 91-624 dated 31 December 1970. Remaining area of the authorized channel from the entrance to the northeasterly side of the Summer Street Bridge has not been abandoned. (See Table 1-C at end of chapter for total Federal cost of existing project to September 1979.) 4. BRIDGEPORT HARBOR, CONN. Location. On north shore of Long Island Sound, about 51 miles east of New York City. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 220.) Previous projects. For details, see page 1756 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 133 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation, see Annual Report for 1968. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed portion of project; for Black Rock Harbor breakwaters and Burr and Cedar Creek anchorage there is no reasonable prospect that required cooperation will be forthcoming from local interests. For further details, see Annual Report for 1968. Terminal facilities. There are 35 waterfront facilities serving port of Bridgeport, all of which are used or in usable condition. Three wharves are owned by city of Bridgeport and three others may be used by public upon agreement with the owners or operators. (See Port and Terminal Facilities of Southern New England, No. 4, revised in 1952.) Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Hired labor costs of $29,600 were incurred for preparation of plans and specifications, surveys and preparation of an environmental assessment in connection with maintenance dredging proposed for a portion of Bridgeport Harbor and the Black Rock Harbor Channels. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project is complete except for the Black Rock Harbor breakwaters and the Burr and Cedar Creek anchorage which are considered inactive. 5. BRISTOL HARBOR, BRISTOL, R.I. Location. Bristol Harbor is on the east side of upper Narragansett Bay, in Bristol County, about 13 miles southeast of Providence, Rhode Island. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 278, 353 and 1210.) Existing project. The project provides for an offshore breakwater 1,600 feet long located about 400 feet west of the Coast Guard pier and extending generally in a northwesterly direction. Total estimated cost (Oct., 1980) is $6,250,000 of which $2,000,000 is non-Federal cost. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Local interests are required to provide, without cost to the United States, all lands, easements and rightsof- way necessary for construction; hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction and subsequent maintenance of the project and provide a cash contribution currently estimated at 32 percent of project cost. Terminal facilities. The developed waterfront of Bristol Harbor is concentrated along a half-mile stretch of east shore of harbor. In this section, there are six privately-owned landings, two owned by the Town, one by the State, and one by the Federal Government. All private landings are of granite construction and have truck access. Two have gasoline and one has diesel oil service; and are used primarily for landing shellfish. Town and State piers are open to public, and include facilities for about 50 small boats and finger piers for larger craft. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Advance engineering and design was continued and a reaffirmation report is in progress. The report recommends a slight realignment of the offshore breakwater further to the southeast to protect the U.S. Coast Guard Pier and more fully protect commercial wharf areas. Condition at end offiscal year. A public meeting was held in August 1980 and local interests are in favor of the realigned breakwater. The Phase I AE&D report is scheduled for completion in October 1981. 6. CAPE COD CANAL, MASS. Location. This waterway is a sea level canal; extending from head of Buzzards Bay, Mass., to a point on Cape Cod Bay about 15 miles southeast of Plymouth Harbor, Mass. In general direction canal trends from Buzzards Bay easterly to Cape Cod Bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Charts 251 and 1208.) Existing project. For description of existing project and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests must also bear 50 percent of future recreational development in accordance with 1965 Federal Water Project Recreation Act. Terminal facilities. There are seven terminals on the canal, of which three are privately owned. Four are used for receipt and freezing of fish and two are used for receipt and storage of oil. Seventh terminal is State pier, owned by Commonwealth of Massachusetts, and on north bank of canal at Bourne Neck. Terminals are adequate for purposes for which they are used. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contracts awarded and contract costs were: replacement of power lines from substation to railroad bridge, $62,763; removal of sunken vessel, Mary J. Landry, $14,471; probes and borings of subsurface conditions in West Boat Basin, $36,631; rubbish removal from all recreation areas, $31,511. Other costs by hired labor and contract: railroad bridge, tower and signal system, $114,486; condition surveys, $84,103; operational costs for roads, bridges and project facilities, $936,208; repairs to slopes, dike and marine structures, $391,784; real estate activities, $24,599; traffic control, $937,730; administrative costs, $169,499; contract specifications and drawings, $208,734. The following contracts were awarded late in the fiscal year; repairs to West Boat Basin, $765,149; pipe alarm system, $11,935. No work was performed on either. Major Rehabilitation: Major rehabilitation of the two highway bridges crossing the canal is now underway. The rehabilitation consists of replacing the decks of both bridges, repair or 1-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 replacement, where appropriate, of structural steel members and cleaning and painting superstructures of bridges. A continuing contract in the amount of $12,957,876 awarded in June 1979 for rehabilitation of the Bourne Bridge was completed. Earnings for fiscal year 1981 totalled $6,754,217. Another continuing contract in the amount of $8,014,758 for the Sagamore Bridge was awarded in April 1981. Total earnings were $1,940,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Navigational improvements were completed in April 1963, with completion of East Boat Basin, extension. Initial recreational development consists of public use facilities at various locations was completed in February 1965. Improvements to public use facilities at the East Boat Basin were completed in May 1974. Construction of public use facilities at Bourne Scenic Park were completed in May 1976. Canal is crossed by two high-level highway bridges and a vertical-lift railroad bridge. Initial major rehabilitation of Bourne Highway was completed in December 1965. Minor rehabilitation of stone breakwater was completed in October 1963. Major rehabilitation of Sagamore Bridge is now underway. Canal in landcut from easterly entrance to station 430 has a minimum bottom width of 480 feet, except opposite State pier where width is 450 feet. From station 430 to Wings Neck (Hog Island Channel) width is 500 feet and beyond Wings Neck (Cleveland Ledge Channel) 700 feet. 7. CHATHAM (STAGE) HARBOR, MASS. Location. At northeastern corner of Nantucket Sound, about 16 miles east of Hyannis Harbor, Mass., and 66 miles south of Providence Harbor at northern extremity of Cape Cod. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1209.) Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1942. Existing project. An entrance channel 10 feet deep and 150 feet wide from Chatham Roads into upper harbor. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are three commercial wharves on north side of inner harbor open to public use to owners' convenience. Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: A contract was awarded in September 1981 in the amount of $23,890 for removal and disposal of a deteriorated timber pile jetty which was endangering navigation. Hired labor costs of $4,700 were incurred for the preparation of contract drawings and specifications. Work on contract has not begun. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of existing project was initiated in September and completed in October 1957. By 1961, a break in barrier beach connecting Morris and Monomoy Islands caused Federal Channel to fill in completely. Local interests dredged an emergency channel to obtain 8-foot depth in June 1962 and performed additional dredging in 1963. Minimal maintenance dredging by the Federal Government in April and May 1964 provided access to inner harbor for 1964 boating season. A new 10-foot channel through Harding Beach and construction of a dike from Harding Beach to Morris Island was completed in July 1965. 8, CLINTON HARBOR, CONN. Location. On north shore of Long Island Sound, about 10 miles west of mouth of Connecticut River and about 20 miles east of New Haven Harbor, Conn. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 216 and 1212.) Previous project. For details see page 640, Annual Report for 1894 and page 112, Annual Report for 1943. Existing project. A channel 8 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide from Long Island Sound to upper end of wharves at Clinton, an anchorage area of same depth opposite and above wharves, 50 feet wide south of channel and extending 600 feet above end of channel, with widths of 150 to 250 feet, and for maintenance of a stone dike closing a breach in the sandy peninsula which separates the river from outer harbor. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are several small private wharves, some of which are open to public use. These facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: A continuing contract for maintenance dredging was awarded in September 1981 in the amount of $166,800. Hired labor costs of $11,100 were incurred for preparation of plans and specifications and an environmental assessment. Work on contract has not begun. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was completed in 1950. CONNECTICUT RIVER BELOW HARTFORD, CONN. Location. Has its source in Connecticut Lake in northern New Hampshire, flows southerly 380 miles and empties into Long Island Sound at Saybrook, Conn., 14 miles west of New London. Hartford, now head of commercial navigation, is 52 statute miles, by channel, from mouth. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 215, 266, 267.) Previous project. For details see Annual Reports for 1915 and 1938. Eightmile River, Conn., elimination as separate project: Provides for a channel 8 feet deep and 75 feet wide from deep water in Connecticut River to Hamburg and for turning basin of same depth, 150 feet wide, approximately 300 feet long at Hamburg. Project was adopted by River and Harbor Act of 1910. Costs and expenditures were $9,000 all for new work. In accordance with River and Harbor Act of 1950, project for Connecticut River below Hartford was modified to include project for Eightmile River. Aforementioned act also provided for an anchorage basin 6 feet deep and about 6.5 acres in area in upper cove in Hamburg. A channel 15 feet deep and 150 feet wide for a distance of 52 miles upstream to Hartford; two riprap jetties at the mouth of the river; and dikes, training walls, revetments and other regulatory works along the river between Hartford and Gildersleeve Island. The project provides for small-boat improvements at Wethersfield Cove; Eightmile River; Essex; and North Cove, Old Saybrook. For a more detailed description of project see page 7 of Annual Report for 1974. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. On both Connecticut and Eightmile Rivers there are two or three wharves at each of river towns, one or more in each town being open to public use. At Hartford and Middletown there is about one-half of wharf frontage along west bank of river. Facilities adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: A continuing contract for Maintenance dredging of various river bars was awarded in July 1981 in the amount of $694,000. Dredging work began in August and during the fiscal year 150,100 cubic yards of material have been removed at a cost of $315,294. Hired labor costs of $139,700 were incurred for preparation of plans and specifications, contract administration and inspection and surveys. 1_i 9. NEW ENGLAND DIVISION Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was completed in September 1965 with the construction of channel and anchorage in North Cove, Old Saybrook, Conn. For further details, see Annual Report for 1974. 10. COREA HARBOR, GOULDSBORO, ME. Location. Corea Harbor is located within the village of Corea in the town of Gouldsboro, Hancock County, Maine. It is 130 miles northeast of Portland and 55 miles southeast of Bangor. Existing project. Provides for an anchorage basin 8 feet deep, 600 feet long in an east and west direction and 400 feet wide in a north and south direction. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Local interests are required to provide, maintain and operate without cost to the United States, an adequate public landing with provisions for the sale of motor fuel, lubricants and potable water open and available to the use of all on equal terms; provide without cost to the United States all necessary lands, easements and rights-of-way required for construction and subsequent maintenance of the project including suitable dredged material disposal areas with necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads and embankments therefor; hold and save the United States free from damages that may result from construction and maintenance of the project; accomplish without cost to the United States alterations and relocations as required in sewer, water supply, drainage and other utility facilities; establish regulations prohibiting the discharge of untreated sewage, garbage and other pollutants in the waters of the harbor users thereof, which regulations shall be in accordance with applicable laws or regulations of Federal, State and local authorities responsible for pollution prevention and control. Terminal facilities. There are 21 wharves, 15 of which are small and cannot be approached by vessels at low tide. The wharves are privately owned. Facilities are considered adequate for present commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Detailed Project Report was completed. Report approved and project authorized for construction. Condition at end of fiscal year. Preparation of plans and specifications not yet initiated. 11. FALL RIVER HARBOR, MASS. Location. At mouth of Taunton River, on east side and at head of Mount Hope Bay, which empties into ocean through Narragansett Bay and Sakonnet River; it is about 18 miles northerly from Newport Harbor. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 13221.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1915 and 1938. Existing project. For description of existing project and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1978. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. For terms of local cooperation pertinent to remaining work authorized by River and Harbor Act of 1968, see Annual Report for 1975. Terminal facilities. In upper harbor there are several deepdraft terminals, two of which are in Somerset and three in Fall River, four more deep-draft terminals are located along the Tiverton waterfront in Rhode Island. These are modern terminals used in connection with electrical generating stations; receipt, distribution and storage of oil and petroleum products; and a State Pier for handling general cargo, and a permanent berth for the battleship Massachusetts. There are six other wharves with berthing depth of less than 25 feet used for mooring recreational and training craft, receipt and storage of petroleum products, boat servicing and repairs. (See Port and Terminal Facilities of Southern New England, No. 4 Revised in 1976.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: An extensive sampling and testing program has been conducted on the material to be dredged; update the benefits and costs; review all potentially feasible disposal options; and hold a series of public workshops to present the test results and obtain the views of Federal, State and local interests. Maintenance Project condition surveys were conducted at a cost of $24,600. Condition at end of fiscal year. Work effort is continuing on the preparation of a revised Design Memorandum and Environmental Impact Statement. Coordination is ongoing with Massachusetts and Rhode Island regarding the selection of a suitable disposal site for the dredged material. All work for projects authorized prior to 1968 was completed in March 1959. 12. FORE RIVER, BRAINTREE AND WEYMOUTH, MASS. Location. The Weymouth-Fore River is located approximately nine miles from downtown Boston. It flows into Hingham Bay which forms the southern portion of Boston Harbor. The river forms a portion of the boundary between the cities of Weymouth and Braintree. Existing project. Provides for a channel 6 feet deep with a width from 60 to 100 feet. The channel would begin at the Federal ship channel in Quincy and extend 8,000 feet upstream to the Quincy Avenue bridge. The total estimated cost (June 1981) is $400,000 of which $200,000 is non-Federal cost. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Local interests would provide a cash contribution of 50 percent of the cost of construction; provide without cost to the United States all necessary lands, easements, and rights-of-way required for construction and subsequent maintenance of the project including suitable dredged material disposal areas with necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads, and embankments therefor; hold and save the United States free from damages that may result from construction and maintenance of the project; provide and maintain berths, floats, piers, and similar marina and mooring facilities as needed for transient and local vessels as well as necessary access roads, parking areas, and other needed public use shore facilities open and available to all on equal terms; establish regulations prohibiting the discharge of untreated sewage, garbage and other pollutants in the waters of the harbor users thereof, which regulations shall be in accordance with applicable laws or pollution prevention and control. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Detailed Project Report was completed. Report approved and project authorized for construction. Condition at end of fiscal year. Preparation of plans and specifications not yet initiated. 13. GLOUCESTER HARBOR AND ANNISQUAM RIVER, MASS. Location. Gloucester Harbor is at southern extremity of Cape Ann, about 23 miles northeast by water from Boston Harbor. Annisquam River is a narrow tidal waterway extending across base of Cape Ann from Gloucester Harbor on south side to Ipswich Bay on northside, a distance of approximately 4 miles. A reach of this waterway, at Gloucester Harbor end, for a length of about 1,800 feet, is known as Blynman Canal. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 243.) 1-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1915, and 1937. Existing project. Provides for a breakwater at the Outer Harbor entrance; the removal of eight ledge areas in the northern half of the harbor; a 20-foot entrance channel into the Inner Harbor, separating into two 20-foot access channels along the side of the State Fish Pier; a 16-foot anchorage at the junction of the two 20-foot access channels; an 18-foot entrance channel into Harbor Cove, with a 15-foot anchorage outside Harbor Cove and a 10-foot access channel in Harbor Cove; a 16-foot entrance channel into Smith Cove; and removal of a rock shoal in the entrance channel to harbor Cove to a depth of 24 feet. Annisquam River provides for a channel 8 feet deep from Gloucester Harbor to Ipswich Bay, and an anchorage about 17 acres in extent and 8 feet deep at entrance of Lobster Cove. For a more detailed description of existing project see Annual Report for 1973. (See Annual Report for 1976 for Acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. In Gloucester Harbor, 75 piers and wharves, 90 percent of which are used in some connection with the fishing industry. Of these two are owned by the city. Fish pier is owned by Massachusetts and leased to city. All others are privately owned, and not available to the public. There are also two commercial wharves on east bank of Annisquam River. There are no railroad sidings available. Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: The contract awarded in May 1981 for repairs to the Dog Bar Breakwater was completed in August 1981. Total contract costs were $86,860. Hired labor costs were incurred for preparation of plans and specifications and supervision and inspection of the contract work. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was completed in July 1965. 14. GREEN HARBOR, MASS. Location. On west side of Massachusetts Bay within the town of Marshfield about 30 miles southeast of Boston and 9 miles north of Plymouth Harbor. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 245.) Existing project. Provides for channel 6 feet deep (8 feet at entrance), 100 feet wide extending about 4,000 feet from deep water to head of navigation with small turning basin at upstream limit; 5-acre anchorage near Town pier, 6 feet deep; sealing, rebuilding in part, and a 200 feet extension of existing west jetty at elevation +12, with dike to beach berm at elevation + 14 feet, and raising east jetty to elevation + 14. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Major terminal facility is Town Pier in village of Brant Rock. Facility is a bulkheaded, earth-filled landing and parking area about 290 feet wide, extending 210 feet into harbor. A marina service is south of Town Pier; and a facility for recreational craft has been developed on south side of harbor near head of navigation. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging work that began in fiscal year 1981 with an additional 25,000 cubic yards of material removed. Total contractor earnings this fiscal year were $101,070. Hired labor costs of $55,000 were incurred for administration and inspection and surveys. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of existing project commenced in July 1968 and was completed in October 1969. 15. GUILFORD HARBOR, CONN. Location. On north shore of Long Island Sound about 13 miles east of New Haven Harbor, Conn. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 217 and 1212.) Existing project. An entrance channel 6 feet deep, 100 feet wide through the harbor from Long Island Sound to an anchorage basin in East River, length 0.8 mile; a channel 6 feet deep, 60 feet wide up Sluice Creek 880 feet to Whitfield Street; an anchorage basin 6 feet deep, 200 feet wide in East River, length 1,500 feet. Mean and spring tidal ranges are 5.4 and 6.4 feet, respectively. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. State wharf about 370 feet long provides adequate facilities for existing commerce. Town wharf on north bank of East River at foot of Whitfield Street is no longer useable. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: A maintenance dredging contract was awarded in September 1981 in the amount of $524,520. No work was accomplished under the contract at the end of the fiscal year. Hired labor costs of $1,900 were incurred for sampling and testing, and plans and specifications. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was completed in April 1957, with exception of a boulder, which was removed from project area in 1958. 16. HAMPTON HARBOR, N.H. Location. On New Hampshire seacoast 13 miles south of Portsmouth Harbor, 5 miles north of mouth of Merrimack River at Newburyport, Mass. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1206.) Existing project. Extending north jetty 1,000 feet, raising outer 300 feet of south jetty and constructing a 180-foot spur to high ground, and dredging to provide a channel 8 feet deep and 150 feet wide across entrance bar. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are seven piers in Hampton Harbor. State of New Hampshire maintains two pile and timber piers, two in Hampton about 1,500 feet north of entrance and one in Seabrook one-half mile south of entrance. Hampton pier has a 6-foot walkway to a float that has depths of 4 to 6 feet. Seabrook pier has a float and a water depth of about 3 feet at outer end. One landing is open to public. Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Work under a contract for repairs to the north jetty began in April 1981 and 1,293 tons of stone were placed at a cost of $109,905. The wire rope handrail on the north jetty was replaced at an additional cost of $8,344. Maintenance dredging work by contract began in July 1981 and 23,800 cubic yards of materials were removed at a cost of $174,600. Hired labor costs of $24,500 were incurred for contract supervision and inspection and surveys. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was completed in November 1965. 17. ISLAND END RIVER, CHELSEA, MASS. Location. The Island End River is located approximately two miles north of downtown Boston in the heart of the Boston Metropolitan area. The river forms a portion of the boundary between 1-6 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION the cities of Chelsea and Everett, and coincidentally Middlesex and Suffolk Counties. The Island End River flows into the Mystic River about one-half mile upstream of the confluence of the Mystic and Chelsea Rivers in Boston's Inner Harbor. Existing project. The project provides recreational boaters with a 100-foot wide access channel extending from the Mystic River for a length of approximately 2,500 feet to the site of a proposed marina facility and boat launching ramp, and would allow for an overall depth of 6 feet at mean low water. Total estimated cost (April 1981) is $629,000 of which $314,500 is non-Federal cost. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Local interests would provide a cash contribution of 50 percent of the cost of construction; provide without cost to the United States all necessary lands, easements and rights-of-way required for construction and subsequent maintenance of the project including suitable dredged material disposal areas with necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads and embankments therefor; hold and save the United States free from damages that may result from construction and maintenance of the project; provide and maintain berths, floats, piers, and similar marina and mooring facilities as needed for transient and local vessels as well as necessary access roads, parking areas and other needed public use shore facilities open and available to all on equal terms; establish regulations prohibiting the discharge of untreated sewage, garbage, and other pollutants in the waters of the harbor users thereof, which regulations shall be in accordance with applicable laws or regulations of federal, state and local authorities responsible for pollution prevention and control. Operation and results during fiscal year. New work: Detailed Project Report was completed. Report approved and project authorized for construction. Preparation of plans and specifications was completed. Construction contract awarded in September 1981. Condition at end oflfiscal year. Construction is underway. 18. JONESPORT HARBOR, MAINE. Location. Jonesport Harbor is situated on the north side of Moosabec Reach in Washington County, Maine about 190 miles northeast of Portland, Maine, and about 40 miles southwest of the Canadian border at Eastport, Maine. Existing project. Provides for a combined 1200-foot rubble mound and cellular steel sheet pile breakwater, 1,200 feet in length; a 15-acre anchorage composed of 9 acres, 6 feet deep, and 6 acres, 8 feet deep; and an entrance channel 100 feet wide and 8 feet deep. Latest approved cost estimate (October 1980) is $7,150,000. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Local interests are required to provide without cost to the United Stated, all lands, easements, and rights-of-way required for construction and subsequent maintenance of the project and for aids to navigation upon the request of the Chief of Engineers, including suitable areas determined by the Chief of Engineers to be required in the general public interest for initial and subsequent disposal of spoil, and also necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads, and embankments therefor or the costs of such retaining works; hold and save the United States free from damages that may result from the construction and maintenance of the project; provide, maintain, and operate necessary mooring facilities and utilities including a public landing in Sawyer Cove with berthing depths alongside the landing commensurate with the depth provided in the entrance channel and including an adequate access road, parking area, and suitable related facilities open to all on equal terms, including transients; accomplish without cost to the United States such utility or other relocations or alterations as necessary for project purposes; reserve spaces within the harbor adequate for the accommodation of transient craft; regulate the use, growth, and free development of the harbor facilities with the understanding that said facilities will be open to all on equal terms, including transients; and establish regulations prohibiting discharge of pollutants into the waters of Jonesport Harbor by users thereof, which regulations shall be in accordance with applicable laws or regulations of Federal, State, and local authorities responsible for pollution prevention and control. Terminal facilities. There are thirteen privately owned wharves in the harbor, twelve of which are used by local fishermen and one which is used for receiving about three million gallons of petroleum annually. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Advance engineering design is complete. Design Memorandum was approved 1 April 1980. Seismic surveys and probings to identify rock line initiated and completed. Condition at end of fiscal year. Preparation of plans and specifications have not been started. Commencement is dependent on future funding by the Congress. 19. KENNEBEC RIVER, ME. Location. Drains a large number of lakes and minor streams, and flows from Moosehead Lake about 150 miles southerly and discharges into Atlantic Ocean about 25 miles east of Portland. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 288, 289 and 314.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1915 and 1938. Existing project. A channel 27 feet deep and not less than 500 feet wide, extending from mouth to bridge at Bath; thence to Gardiner a channel not less than 150 feet wide, 17 feet deep at Beef Rock Shoal, at foot of Swan Island, 18 feet deep through rock at Lovejoy Narrows, near head of Swan Island, decreasing to 16 feet deep at Gardiner; channel west of Swan Island, 100 feet wide, 12 feet deep, except at upper shoal, where depth was to be 15 feet; and channel 125 feet wide and 11 feet deep from Gardiner upstream to Augusta at head of navigation. Section of river included in project is about 44 miles long. Work includes dredging, rock excavation, and two riprap training walls. Portion of project for dredging 27-foot channel from Bath Iron Works Corp. to 0.6 of a mile above bridge at Bath is considered inactive. Estimated cost (1954) of this portion is $129,500. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Wharves suitable for landing or loading are at Bath, Woolwich, Richmond, Randolph, Gardiner, Hallowell, and Augusta. Of the 24 wharves at Bath, 5 are publicly owned and 19 privately owned, about one-third are in poor repair and little used. Rail connections are available at 19 wharves at Bath. Depths alongside range from 12 to 25 feet. At other points named above there are 16 wharves in usable condition. All but one are equipped with mechanism for handling passengers and freight. Those open to the public on equal terms are two at Hallowell and one each at Randolph and Augusta. None are publicly owned. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Hired labor costs of $9,200 were incurred for preparation of plans and specifications and an environmental assessment. A contract for maintenance dredging of the Doubling Point Reach was awarded in September 1981 in the amount of $454,900. No work was performed on this contract during the fiscal year. On a con- 1-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 tract with the State of Maine, monitoring was planned to ascertain the effect of dredging on downstream dam flats. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project is complete except for inactive portion. 20. KENNEBUNK RIVER, MAINE Location. Source of Kennebunk River is in central part of York County in southwestern Maine. Stream flows about 15 miles southeasterly and discharges into Atlantic Ocean about 350 miles southwest of Portland, Maine. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1205.) Existing project. For description of existing project and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1977. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 22 landings 16 of which are private, 1 public, 2 yacht clubs, 1 hotel, and 2 boatyards. Marine railway facilities include two of 15-ton capacity, and one of 10-ton capacity. There are 4 berths and 10 moorings. Open storage, boat building, repairs, and supplies are available for pleasure and commercial craft. Public landing of granite block construction, has unloading facilities which include two tackle and falls on arms; and is used by fishing craft to transfer catches for transportation. Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: A continuing contract in the amount of $98,900 was awarded in August 1981 for repairs to the east and west jetties. Hired labor costs of $11,600 were incurred for preparation of plans and specifications, supervision, inspection and surveys. Work is underway and fiscal year earnings totalled $10,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was completed in December 1968, with the completion of rock removal at entrance to west channel. Extension of west jetty was completed in April 1965; and improvement dredging in the 6- and 8-foot channels, 6-foot anchorages, and construction of a sand fence were completed in November 1965. 21. MENEMSHA CREEK MARTHA'S VINEYARD, MASS. Location. South side of Vineyard Sound about 13 miles southwest of Woods Hole, Mass. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1210.) Existing project. Entrance channel 10 feet deep and 80 feet wide between jetties to and including anchorage basin 10 feet deep in wide northern portion and 6 feet deep in narrow southern end, and channel 8 feet deep and 80 feet wide through Menemsha Creek to deep water in Menemsha Pond about 1.1 miles from entrance, and for maintenance of existing jetties. All depths refer to mean low water. Mean and spring tidal ranges at entrance are 2.7 and 3.4 feet, respectively. Latest published map is in project document (H. Doc. 365, 76th Cong., 1st sess.) (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. The Commonwealth of Massachusetts and local interests have expended over $202,000 for improvements and maintenance of Menemsha Creek and its entrance. Terminal facilities. The town wharf on the basin has a bulkhead frontage of about 600 feet. Other public and private landings are available. Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: A contract for repairs to the east jetty was completed in June at a cost of $89,305. Hired labor costs of $1,700 were incurred for contract supervision and inspection. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was completed in 1950. 22. MILFORD HARBOR, CONN. Location. On north shore of Long Island Sound, about 8 miles west of New Haven Harbor. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 219.) Previous projects. For details, see Annual Report for 1915 and Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Provides for a channel, an anchorage and two riprap jetties. For further detailed description, see Annual Report for 1974. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Specifically authorized project. Fully complied with for completed portion. Spoil disposal areas are required for maintenance. Terminal facilities. Three bulkhead wharves near entrance are used by oyster industry. Town wharf near head of navigation is open to public use. Connecticut State Shellfish Commission operates a small wharf not open to public. There are several yacht landings. Facilities are adequate for existing traffic. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: A contract for maintenance dredging of the entrance channel began in December 1980. There were 16,768 cubic yards of material removed. Contract was completed and total contract costs were $177,648. Hired labor costs of $22,800 were incurred for supervision, inspection and surveys. Condition at end offiscal year. Project is complete except for following inactive portions: an 8-foot east basin anchorage and section 107 6-foot anchorage. Burns Point jetty was repaired in 1963. 23. NEW HAVEN HARBOR, CONN. Location. On rmrth shore of Long Island Sound, about 67 miles east of New Yc--k City. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 218.) Previous project. For details, see Annual Report for 1915 and 1938. Existing project. For description of existing project and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1978. Local cooperation. Fully complied with, Terminal facilities. Port of New Haven is served by 53 waterfront facilities; 40 are within city limits of New Haven, and 5 in West Haven. Improved waterways within port area along which facilities are located include West River, Main Harbor, West and East Branches of Mill River, and Quinnipiac River channels. Facilities are all privately owned and operated with exception of city wharf and U.S. Coast Guard wharf. Depths alongside piers and wharves range from 35 to zero feet at mean low water. Nearly half of the facilities have rail connections either on or at rear which connect with N.Y., N.H. & Hartford Railroad and most are accessible by paved streets. Nineteen wharves have mechanicalhandling facilities, six wharves are open to public use upon agreement with the owners. Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. (For further details see Port and Terminal Facilities of Southern New England No. 4 revised in 1964.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Sampling and testing work was completed at a cost of $45,400. Hired labor costs of $14,800 were incurred for preparation of an environmental assessment, administration of sampling and testing work. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project is complete. 1-8 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION 24. NEWBURYPORT HARBOR, MASS. Location. On south bank of Merrimack River, about 2.5 miles above mouth, and about 48 miles by water north of Boston. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 331.) Existing project. Two jetties, one projecting 4,118 feet from the north shore, the other projecting 2,445 feet from the south shore, converging until 1,000 feet apart, then extending seaward 1,000 feet parallel to axis of channel; partially closing Plum Island Basin by a timber dike; channel 12 feet deep and 400 feet wide through bar, thence 9 feet deep and 200 feet wide to and including a widened turning basin in front of wharves. Portion of project for continuous channel from sea to wharves at Newburyport, 15 feet deep and 200 feet wide to and including a widened turning basin in front of wharves is considered inactive. Estimated cost of this portion (June 1955) is $106,000. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Twenty wharves extending along a frontage of about 3,500 feet of south bank of Merrimack River below highway bridge and one small pier on north side of river. Terminal facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: A contract in the amount of $572,190 for maintenance dredging of the entrance channel was awarded in June and completed in July. There were 102,633 cubic yards of material removed and disposed of in open water by hopper dredge. Hired labor costs of $21,500 were incurred for contract supervision, inspection and surveys. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project except for inactive portion was completed in August 1958, with the improvement of 12-foot channel and outer harbor. North jetty was completed in 1914; south jetty was completed, except for a length of about 30 feet at its outer end, in 1905. Required rehabilitation in these jetties completed in September 1970. Plum Island basin was partially closed in 1883 by construction of a timber dike. North Rock was removed in 1901. 25. NORWALK HARBOR, CONN. Location. On north shore of Long Island Sound, about 40 miles east of New York City. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 221 and 1213.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1915 and 1938. Existing project. For description of existing project and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1973. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are two city wharves, neither of which is in usable condition. There are 19 private wharves in use or in usable condition, having a total berthing space of about 3,100 feet. One has rail connections. Private wharves are inadequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 4 for Southern parts of New England (1952).) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: The maintenance dredging contract which was awarded in March 1980 was completed. An estimated additional 203,200 cubic yards of material were removed at a cost of $962,906. Hired labor costs of $141,700 were incurred for inspection, surveys, sampling and testing. Dredging work was completed in June 1981. Total contract cost was $1,506,330. Disposal monitoring was accomplished by contract at a cost of $25,000. Conditions at end of fiscal year. Existing project was completed in 1950. 26. PORTLAND HARBOR, MAINE. Location. On southwestern coast of Maine about 100 miles northeast of Boston, Mass. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 13292.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1915 and 1936. Existing project. For description of existing project and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1978. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 37 waterfront facilities, of which 4 are not used. Seven wharves are publicly owned, 4 by the U.S. Government, 2 by State of Maine, and 1 by city of South Portland. Mechanical-handling facilities are available at 24 wharves. Railroad connections have been made to 27 of them. Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. (For further details see page 13, H. Doc. 216, 87th Cong., and Port Series 1 for Ports of Searsport Harbor and Portland, Maine and Portsmouth, N.H. (revised 1964).) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: The maintenance dredging contract was completed. There were 1,300 cubic yards of material removed at a cost of $3,367. Total contract costs were $3,141,450 which includes a portion of a claim concerning a dispute in quantities dredged. Final resolution of that and other claims was incomplete at the end of the fiscal year. Preand post-dredge surveys were done by contract at a cost of $33,700. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was completed in August 1966, except for ledge encountered in House Island anchorage. Removal of ledge completed in June 1968. 27. PORTSMOUTH HARBOR AND PISCATAQUA RIVER, MAINE AND N.H. Location. Piscataqua River forms a portion of boundary between Maine and New Hampshire. Mouth of this river is called Portsmouth Harbor. It is 45 miles northeast of Boston Harbor, Mass., and 37 miles southwest of Portland Harbor, Maine. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 229 and 329.) Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1892. Existing project. For description of existing project and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1972. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. For further details on terminal facilities see Annual Report for 1972. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: The maintenance dredging contract was completed. Payment was made for removing additional shoals at a lump sum cost of $88,600, bringing the total contract costs to $398,035. Hired labor costs of $19,700 were incurred for inspection and surveys. Condition at end offiscal year. All work has been completed. Removal of ledge rock areas in the 35-foot channel, except for removal of sand shoal 400 feet upstream of Interstate Bridge, and removal of railroad engine from the harbor were completed in 1966. Shoal removal was completed in 1969 in the 35-foot channel. Construction of 6-foot channel and anchorage was completed in 1971 at a reduced scope due to high construction costs, evidenced by initial bids received. 28. SAKONNET HARBOR, R.I. Location. Sakonnet Harbor, originally known as Church Cove, is located in the southwestern part of the town of Little Compton, Newport County, Rhode Island. It is about 30 miles 1-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS. U.S. ARMY 1981 southeast of Providence, and 5 miles east of Newport. The harbor is located at the eastern side of the entrance to the Sakonnet River, and directly adjoins the Atlantic Ocean at Block Island Sound. Existing project. This provides for a breakwater 400 feet long in a northerly direction; a 400-foot extension in a northeasterly direction; removal of rock nearest the wharf to a depth of 8 feet; dredging the harbor to a depth of 8 feet; a 500-foot rubble-mound breakwater and a 110-foot wide by 10-foot deep navigation channel. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for features authorized through 1954. For portion of project authorized in 1981, local interests would be responsible for the operation and maintenance of an adequate public landing for the sale of fuel, lubricants, and drinking water open to all on an equal basis, and for providing all necessary land, easements and rights-of-way for construction and for providing disposal areas for dredged materials. The town would also hold the United States free from damages that may result from construction and maintenance of the project. Moreover, the local sponsor would provide and maintain berths and other mooring facilities for local and transient vessels as well as access roads, parking lots and other required public use shore facilities, open and available to all on an equal basis. Terminal facilities. There are four wharves in the harbor, none of which are publicly owned. The Sakonnet Yacht Club pier on the east side of the harbor projects about 300 feet from the shore has a float which makes it readily accessible to small craft. The three other wharves are located on the west side of the harbor. These wharves, for practical purposes, form one structure about 150 feet wide with two piers, 30 and 40 feet wide, projecting 35 and 70 feet therefrom. The piers are open to the public free of charge. The State highway located along two sides of the harbor provides access to the wharves. These facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operation and results during fiscal year. New work: The Detailed Project Report for the 500 foot rubble-mound breakwater and the 10 foot deep navigation channel was approved and project authorized for construction. Preparation of plans and specifications for construction was halted when the town expressed a desire to modify the local assurances agreement to include the state of Rhode Island as a local interest. The new agreement is being prepared for submittal to the office, Chief of Engineers, for approval before it is presented to the local interests. Condition at end of fiscal year. Earlier portion of the existing project was completed in 1957 with the dredging of an 8-foot harbor area and ledge removal nearest the wharf to a depth of 8 feet. The original breakwater was completed in 1900 and the extension was completed in 1957. The removal of rock nearest the breakwater was completed in 1908. Construction of rubble-mound breakwater and navigation channel authorized in 1981 has not started. 29. SESUIT HARBOR, MASS. Location. Sesuit Harbor is located on the north shore of Dennis in Barnstable County, about 85 miles southeast of Boston, Massachusetts. The town of Dennis is bordered on the north by Cape Cod Bay, Brewster and Harwich on the east, Nantucket Sound on the south and Yarmouth on the west. Land area within the town is 20.66 square miles and has a tidal shoreline of 29.8 miles. Existing project. Provides for a channel 6 feet deep below mean low water and 100 feet wide from deep water in Cape Cod Bay to a point opposite the Dennis Yacht Club thence reducing in width to 80 feet at the entrance to the inner harbor basin, for a total channel length of 2,400 feet. The current estimated project cost is $182,000. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Local interests would be responsible for fifty percent of the project construction costs, as well as the costs for dredging of all berthing areas outside the limits of the federal project. They would also be responsible for provision of necessary lands, easements, rights-of-way; any necessary vegetation of disposal areas; holding the United States free from damages due to construction and maintenance work. Local interests will perform the necessary dredging, construction and maintenance of additional berthing spaces as required for expansion of the project support facilities during the life of the project as well as establish regulations prohibiting disposal of pollutants into the waterway. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: hydrographic field surveys were conducted and plotted. Preparation of plans and specifications was completed. Agreement of local cooperation was drawn up and submitted to the Commonwealth of Massachusetts for execution. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of project has not been started. 30. WELLFLEET HARBOR, MASS. Location. On Cape Cod Bay, near southern end of the hook of Cape Cod, 12 miles southeast of Provincetown Harbor and 25 miles northeast of entrance to the Cape Cod Canal. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey charts 581 and 1208.) Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1895. Existing project. A channel 10 feet deep and 125 feet wide from "Deep Hole" to town landing, and an anchorage basin of the same depth 800 feet by 500 feet. The project depths refer to mean low water. The mean range of tide is 10 feet and the spring range is 11.6 feet. The latest published map is contained in H. Doc. 557, 76th Cong., 3d sess. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Total actual costs for all requirements of local cooperation under term of the project authorization amount to $458,000, consisting of: $32,000 cash contribution, $166,000 for construction of a public wharf, and $260,000 for dredging in the project area. The Commonwealth of Massachusetts dredged a channel and anchorage basin 6 feet deep in 1916, at a cost of $17,363. Terminal facilities. There are seven wharves in the harbor, only one of which is open to the public. The existing facilities are considered adequate for the existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: The maintenance dredging contract awarded in February was completed and a total of 76,500 cubic yards of material was removed. Total contract costs were $420,895. Hired labor costs of $36,800 were incurred for preparation of plans and specifications, environmental assessment, and supervision and inspection of the dredging contract. Condition at end offiscal year. The channel was dredged to a depth of 4 feet in 1889. The Commonwealth of Massachusetts dredged the 6-foot channel in 1916. The existing project was completed in June 1958, with the construction of the 10-foot channel and anchorage basin. 31. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS (See Table 1-D at end of chapter.) 1-10 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION 32. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Table 1-E at end of chapter.) 33. NAVIGATION ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 107, PUBLIC LAW 86-645 (PREAUTHORIZATION) (See Table 1-F at end of chapter.) Alteration of Bridges 34. AUTHORIZED BRIDGE ALTERATION Location. Chelsea Street Highway Bridge, Mass. Construction was completed in October 1961 with a Federal cost of $138,518. In addition, non-Federal contributed funds amounted to $8,602. For details, see page 63 of Annual Report for 1962. Beach Erosion Control 35. OAKLAND BEACH, WARWICK, R.I. Location. Oakland Beach is located at the southern extremity of Horse Neck in the northeasterly section of Greenwich Bay. It is bordered by Brush Neck Cove on the west and Warwick Cove on the east. Existing project. Provides for the direct placement of suitable sandfill on either side of the existing seawall that protects the parking area. Also the construction of five groin structures (the replacement of the jetty at the east limit of the study is considered a groin). The groins consist of one terminal structure located at each end of the beach, one at each end of the seawall and a low profile structure halfway between the west limit and the seawall. Also included is the construction of rock revetment placed in front of the seawall between the groins. The current project cost is $785,000 of which $215,000 is non-Federal. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Local interests are required to: contribute prior to construction 30 percent of project costs estimated at $215,000 assume full responsibility for all project costs in excess of theFederal cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way necessary for project construction and subsequent maintenance of the project; hold and save the United States free from all claims for damages due to construction of the project; and assure continued public ownership of the park and shore and its administration for public use during the economic life of the project. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: A contract awarded in January 1981 for beach erosion control was completed. Total earnings were $500,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete. 36. REVERE BEACH, MASS. Location. In the City of Revere, Suffolk County, Massachusetts, approximately 7 miles north of the main entrance channel to Boston Harbor and 6 miles northeast of the City of Boston. (See National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Chart No. 13275 and U.S. Geological Survey Maps, Boston Bay quandrangle.) Existing project. In lieu of the project authorized by Rivers and Harbor Act of 1954 (See Annual Report for 1957) provides for raising and widening abut 13,000 feet of beach by placement of suitable sandfill to a general backshore elevation of 18 feet above mean low water, thus furnishing a protective and recreational beach of about 185 feet in width behind the mean high water line. The latest approved cost estimate (Oct. 1980) is $7,700,000 of which $3,850,000 is non-Federal. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Formal assurances have not been requested. Local interests are required to: contribute in cash 50 percent of the cost of construction of the project, presently estimated at $3,850,000; contribute in cash 50 percent of the periodic nourishment cost for an initial period of ten years, now estimated at $55,000 annually, such contribution to be prior to each nourishment operation; assure the continued performance of the periodic nourishment and repair of the project after the first ten years and during the economic life as may be required to serve the intended purpose; assure that water pollution that would endanger the health of bathers would not be permitted; hold the United States free from damages due to construction of the project; provide all necessary lands, easements and rights-of-way for the initial construction and subsequent nourishment of the project; assure continued public ownership of the shore and its administration for public use during the economic life of the project. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Reevaluation of benefits during preconstruction planning studies determined that project is no longer economically justified. Letter report terminated effort. Condition at end of fiscal year. Preconstruction planning has been discontinued. Project will be placed in inactive status. 37. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS. Inspections of beach erosion control projects were made at the following beaches in August 1981 Connecticut - Burial Hill, Calf Pasture, Compo, Cove Island, Cummings Park, Guilford Point, Gulf, Hammonassett, Jennings, Lighthouse Point, Middle Prospect, Sasco Hill, Seaside Park, Sherwood Island Park, Short, Silver to Cedar, Southport, Woodmont Shore; Massachusetts - North Scituate, Oak Bluffs Town Beach, Plymouth Town, Quincy Shore, Revere, Wessagussett and Winthrop; New Hampshire - Hampton and Wallis Sands State Beach; Rhode Island - Misquamicut, Sand Hill Cove and Cliff Walk. 38. OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS. (See Table 1-G at end of chapter.) 39. BEACH EROSION CONTROL ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 103, PUBLIC LAW 87-874 (PREAUTHORIZATION) (See Table 1-H at end of chapter.) Flood Control 40. BLACKSTONE RIVER BASIN, MASS. AND R.I. Works covered by this plan consist of a dam and reservoir o West River and local protection works at three cities on Black stone River. Flood Control Act of 1944 authorized plan for reservoir on West River and local protection works at Worcester, Mass., and Woonsocket and Pawtucket, R.I., substantially in accordance with House Document 624, 78th Congress, 2d session. Flood Control Act of 1960 authorized a local flood protection project at Lower Woonsocket, R.I., substantially in accordance with Senate Document 87, 85th Congress, 2d session. (See Table 1-I end of chapter on reservoir and local protection projects, Blackstone River Basin, for projects comprising authorized plan.) 1-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 40A. WEST HILL DAM, MASS. Location. Dam is on West River, Mass., 3 miles above its confluence with Blackstone River and 2.5 miles northeast of Uxbridge, Mass. (See Geological Survey maps - Blackstone, Mass. and R.I., Milford, Mass., and Grafton, Mass.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Cost of new work for completed project was $1,367,000 for construction and $940,000 for lands and damages including highway and utility relocations, a total of $2,307,000. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of 1944, applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operations consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete. Work on contract for dam and appurtenant structures was initiated in June 1959 and completed in June 1961. Construction of recreational facilities was completed in June 1967. 41. CHARLES RIVER DAM, MASS. Location. On the Charles River in the city of Boston, Suffolk County, Massachusetts, about 2.250 feet downstream of the existing Charles River Dam. (See Geological Survey Map for Boston South, Mass.) Existing project. A multiple-purpose earth and concrete dam with river pumping facilities, three navigation locks and provisions for an overhead highway viaduct. Dam about 750 feet long with maximum height of 36 feet. Pumping facilities comprised of six 1,400 cfs capacity pumps. One commercial lock 40 feet by 300 feet and 17 feet deep. Two recreational locks 25 feet (22 feet controlling) by 200 feet and 8 feet deep. The project provides flood protection to the intensively developed urban and industrial area of Boston and its suburbs. The locks afford increased locking capacity and reduced locking time. Cost for new work was $12,856,000 for lands including relocations and $48,195,000 for construction, a total of $61,051,000. Total includes local costs of $400,000 for lands, $12,456,000 for relocations and a cash contribution of $6,700,000 a total of $19,556,000. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: The contract which was awarded in October 1980 for design, fabrication and installation of exhibits for Charles River Information Center was completed. Total contract earnings were $126,000. Condition at end ofjfiscal year. Project is complete. 42. CHARLES RIVER (NATURAL VALLEY STORAGE AREAS), MASS. Location. The Charles River extends inland from Boston Harbor southwesterly toward the Massachusetts-Rhode Island border and is some 80 miles long with a watershed covering 307 square miles. Existing project. The project provides for Federal acquisition and protection of 17 natural valley storage areas totalling an estimated 9,000 acres in what is known as the Middle and Upper watershed of the Charles River. The acquisition in fee or by easement of the major natural valley storage areas within the Charles River watershed is intended as a multiple-purpose project for flood control, recreation, and fish and wildlife management. The latest approved cost estimate (October 1980) for new work is $7,500,000. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Local interests are required to prevent modifications or alteration of existing roadways, utilities, bridges, culverts, and any other improvements that might affect the drainage characteristics of the natural storage areas; adopt and enforce regulations to restrict development of flood plain lands; and operate and maintain the existing dams along the Charles River. Local assurances have been received. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Real Estate appraisals, boundary surveys, negotiations and closings were continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Land acquisition is continuing. To date a total of 2,281 acres have been acquired in fee at a cost of $1,301,401 and restrictive easements have been obtained for 3,737 acres at a cost of $380,431. 43. CONNECTICUT RIVER BASIN, VT., N.H., MASS., AND CONN. Location. Works covered by this project are a series of dams and reservoirs on tributaries of Connecticut River in Vermont, New Hampshire and Massachusetts, within a radius of 230 miles from Hartford, Conn., and local protection works at several cities in the basin. Existing project. Flood Control Act of 1936, as amended by act of May 25, 1937, authorized construction of 10 reservoirs on tributaries of Connecticut River in accordance with plans in House Document 412, 74th Congress, 2d session, as the same may be revised upon further investigation of 1936 flood. Flood Control Act of 1938 approved a general comprehensive plan for control of floods and other purposes in Connecticut River Valley, as set forth in House Document 455, 75th Congress, 2d session, and authorized $11,524,000 for construction of local flood protection projects in the plan. Act of October 15, 1940, modified act of June 18, 1938, to provide additional protection at East Hartford, Conn., as set forth in House Document 653, 76th Congress, 3d session. Act of August 18, 1941, modified comprehensive plan approved in 1938 to include improvements recommended in House Document 653, 76th Congress, 3d session, and House Document 724, 76th Congress, 3d session, with such further modifications as may be found justifiable in discretion of Secretary of the Army and Chief of Engineers. Latter act also authorized to be appropriated additional $6 million for local protection works and $10 million for reservoirs. Act of October 26, 1942, further modified plan by including construction of Gully Brook conduit at Hartford, Conn. Flood Control Act of 1944 authorized expenditure of $30 million in addition to previous authorization for comprehensive plan approved in 1938 and modified plan by directing specific consideration of an alternative plan of Vermont State Water Conservation Board instead of Williamsville Reservoir in West River Basin, Vt.; directing consultation with affected States during course of investigations and transmission of proposal and plans to each affected State for written views and recommendations for reservoir projects heretofore authorized for construction at Cambridgeport, Ludlow, South Tunbridge, and Gaysville, and resubmission of projects or modifications for construction of Sugar Hill site. Flood Control Act of 1950 modified project for flood control at Hartford, Conn., authorized by Flood Control Act of 1938, as amended, to include Folly Brook dike and conduit. Flood Control Act of 1954 modified plan for flood control in Connecticut River Basin to provide for construction of a reservoir on Otter Brook at South Keene, N.H., in lieu of any reservoir or reservoirs heretofore authorized. This act further modified plan for West River Basin of Connecticut River in Vermont to consist of three reservoirs at Ball Mountain, The Island, and Townshend sites, in lieu of plan of eight reservoirs authorized in Flood Control Act of 1944. Flood Control Act of 1958 modified plan for flood control in Connecticut River Basin to include construction of Littleville Reservoir on Middle Branch of 1-12 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION Westfield River, Mass., and Mad River Reservoir on Mad River, above Winsted, Conn. Flood Control Act of 1960 included authorization in Connecticut River Basin of plan for flood protection on Chicopee River, Mass., substantially in accordance with House Document 434, 86th Congress; plan for flood protection on Westfield River, Mass. substantially in accordance with Senate Document 109, 86th Congress; plan for flood control and related purposes on Farmington River, Conn., substantially in accordance with House Document 443, 86th Congress. Flood Control Act of 1968 included authorization in Connecticut River Basin of plan for construction of Beaver Brook Reservoir, on Beaver Brook in Keene, N.H., substantially in accordance with Senate Document 60, 90th Congress; and plan for flood protection on Park River, Conn., substantially in accordance with Senate Document 43, 90th Congress. Flood Control Act of 1970 deauthorized the construction of a reservoir at Claremont, N.H. The Water Resources Development Act of 1976 deauthorized the construction of the Gaysville Lake, Vermont project. Flood control projects at Cambridgeport Lake, Brockway Lake, Victory Lake, South Tunbridge Lake, Ludlow Lake and The Island Lake, Vermont; Honey Hill Lake, West Canaan Lake, and the Alternative to Sugar Hill Reservoir, New Hampshire were deauthorized in August 1977 in accordance with Section 12 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1974. The authorization for Beaver Brook Lake, New Hampshire project expired in April 1978 due to lack of local cooperation. Local protection projects at Gardner, Mass., Hartford, Vt. and Wethersfield Conn. authorized and constructed in accordance with section 205 of 1948 Flood Control Act. (See Table 1J at end of chapter for reservoirs and local protection works proposed for construction in modified comprehensive plan.) 43A. BALL MOUNTAIN LAKE, VT. Location. Dam is on West River, 29 miles above its junction with Connecticut River at Brattleboro, Vt. It is 2 miles north of village of Jamaica, Vt. (See Geological Survey map for Londonderry, Vt.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Cost of new work for project was $10,448,000 for construction and $350,000 for lands and damages, a total of $10,798,000. Recreation facilities to be constructed are estimated at $200,000. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contract for road repairs awarded in September 1980 was completed. Total contract costs were $103,483. An erosion repair contract awarded September 1980 was completed. Total costs were $18,017. Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. Condition at end offiscal year. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in May 1957 and completed in November 1961. Construction of recreation facilities was initiated in June 1975 and completed in June 1977. Additional recreation facilities construction is scheduled for fiscal year 1982. 43B. BARRE FALLS DAM, MASS. Location. Dam is on Ware River in town of Barre, Mass., 31.9 miles above confluence of Ware and Swift Rivers. It is 13 miles, northwest of Worcester, Mass. (See Geological Survey maps- Barre, Mass., and Wachusett Mountain, Mass.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Cost of completed new work is $1,928,800 for construction and $39,000 for lands and damages including highway relocation, a total of $1,967,800. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. Condition at end oflfiscal year. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in May 1956 and completed in May 1958. 43C. BIRCH HILL DAM, MASS. Location. Dam is on Millers River, 27.3 miles above it junction with Connecticut River. It is 1.3 miles east of South Royalston, Mass. and 7.5 miles northwest of city of Gardner, Mass. (See Geological Survey maps for Royalston and Winchendon, Mass. - N.H. and Templeton, Mass.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Cost of new work for completed project was $1,775,500 for construction and $3,075,000 for land and damages, a total of $4,850,500. Total includes $32,000 as local share for construction of recreation facilities. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Local interests have contributed $32,000 as their required 50 percent cost sharing of recreational development in accordance with 1965 Federal Water Project Recreation Act. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in June 1940 and completed in February 1942. 43D. COLEBROOK RIVER LAKE, CONN. Location. Damsite is in town of Colebrook, Litchfield County, Conn., on West Branch Farmington River about 3.9 miles upstream from its confluence with still River at Riverton, Conn., and about 1.5 miles upstream from Goodwin (Hogback) Dam. (See Geological Survey map for Winsted, Conn.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Cost of new work for completed project was $8,342,000 for construction and $5,922,000 for lands, damages, and relocations, a total of $14,264,000. Local cooperation. Water supply contract was signed by Hartford Connecticut Metropolitan Water District. Repayment will be made in accordance with provisions of 1958 Water Supply Act. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. Contract awarded in July 1981 for road improvements. No work performed in fiscal year. Condition at end offiscal year. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in May 1965 and completed in June 1969. Construction of recreation facilities was initiated in August 1969 and completed in June 1970. 43E. CONANT BROOK DAM, MASS. Location. Site is in south central part of Massachusetts in town of Monson. Damsite, across Conant Brook, is about 2 miles southwest of community of Monson. (See Geological Survey map for Monson, Mass.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Cost of new work for completed project was $1,936,000 for construction 1-13 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 and $1,015,000 for lands, damages, and relocation of roads and utilities, a total of $2,951,000. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of dam, highway relocations, and appurtenances was initiated in June 1964 and completed in December 1966. 43F. KNIGHTVILLE DAM, MASS. Location. Dam is on Westfield River, 27.5 miles above its confluence with Connecticut River. It is 4 miles north of town of Huntington, Mass., and about 12 miles west of city of Northampton, Mass. (See Geological Survey map for Westhampton, Mass.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Cost for new work was $2,594,440 for construction and $821,200 for lands and damages, a total of $3,415,640. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. Condition at end offiscal year. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in August 1939 and completed December 1941. 43G. LANCASTER, ISRAEL RIVER, N.H. Location. Lancaster, New Hampshire is located at the confluence of the Connecticut and Israel Rivers and at the intersection of U.S. Routes 2 and 3. The Israel River, a tributary of the Connecticut, has a length of about 21 miles and a drainage area of 135 square miles. The Israel River enters the Connecticut River from the east. Existing project. The local ice jam flood protection project provides for an earth and rock-filled embankment weir, 160 feet long, protected by layers of gabions. Gabions are rock-filled baskets. The weir has a top width of six feet. The upstream face is sloped at 3 horizontal to 1 vertical. A three foot deep gabion lined stilling basin is provided at the downstream toe of the weir. The top of the weir is nine feet higher than the invert of the stilling basin and six feet above the upstream river invert. A steel sheet pile cut-off wall along the center of the weir prevents water from flowing through the structure. A 3-inch concrete cap was placed over the gabion wires to prevent cutting of or damage to the wires by ice flows and debris. Fish passage through the weir is assured by four concrete sluiceways. The sluiceways are four feet wide and are provided with stop-log slots. Stop-logs will be inserted each year in the late fall to ensure a winter pool behind the weir. They will be removed each spring. An impervious earth fill dike was constructed across a low swale near the right (facing downstream) abutment to prevent the river from taking that course when restricted by ice jamming at the weir. The current estimated project cost is $535,000. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: The contract for construction of the local protection project was completed. Contract earnings totalled $262,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete. 43H. LITTLEVILLE LAKE, MASS. Location. Dam is on middle Branch of Westfield River 1 mile above its confluence with main stem of Westfield River and 25.2 miles above confluence of Westfield River with Connecticut River, in town of Chester. (See Geological Survey map, Chester Mass.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Total cost of new work was $5,863,400 for construction and $1,150,000 for lands and damages, including relocation of a highway, utilities, cemeteries, and structures, a total of $7,013,400. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938, and Title III, Water Supply act of 1958 applies and fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. Condition at end offiscal year. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenances was initiated under a multicomponent contract in June 1962 and completed in September 1965. 431. NORTH HARTLAND LAKE, VT. Location. Dam is on Ottauquechee River, 15 miles above its junction with Connecticut River and 1 mile northwest of North Hartland, Vt. Reservoir extends upstream 5.5 miles. (See Geological Survey map for Hanover, N.H. - Vt.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Cost for new work is $6,349,500 for construction and $963,000 for lands and damages (including highway and utility relocations), a total of $7,312,500. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: A contract was awarded in September for stabilization of slump area. The contract amount was $132,000 and was completed in July. Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete. Construction of dam was initiated in June 1958 and completed in June 1961. 43J. NORTH SPRINGFIELD LAKE, VT. Location. Dam is in town of Springfield, Vt., on Black River, 8.7 miles above its junction with Connecticut River, and 3 miles northwest of Springfield, Vt. (See Geological Survey maps - Ludlow, Vt. and Claremont, N.H.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Cost for new work is $4,782,000 for construction and $2,050,000 for lands and damages, including highway, cemetery, and utility relocations, a total of $6,832,000. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: A contract was awarded in September for stabilization of slump area. The contract amount was $146,566. Contract was completed in May 1981. Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. Condition at end olfiscal year. Project is complete. Construction of dam was initiated inMay 1958 and completed in November 1960. 1-14 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION 43K. CONNECTICUT RIVER, NORTH STRATFORD, N.H. Location. The town of North Stratford, a rural community in Coos County, is located about 20 miles from the Canadian border in extreme northern New Hampshire. The erosion site is located along the east bank of the Connecticut River just north of the bridge of Bloomfield, Vermont. Existing project. Provides for construction of 250 linear feet of stone slope protection along the riverbank adjacent to the fire station. The total estimated cost is $180,000. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Preparation of plans and specifications was completed. Contract for construction in amount of $119,000 was awarded in September 1981. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction is scheduled to begin in fiscal year 1982. 43L. OTTER BROOK LAKE, N.H. Location. Dam is on Otter Brook, 2.4 miles upstream from its junction with The Branch, which flows 2.5 miles to Ashuelot River at Keene. (See Geological Survey maps - Keene, N.H. - Vt., and Monadnock, N.H.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Total cost of new work was $2,782,100 for construction and $1,378,400 for lands and damages, including highway relocation, a total of $4,160,500. An estimate of $170,000 for construction of recreation facilities. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in September 1956 and completed in August 1958. Construction of additional recreation facilities is scheduled for fiscal year 1982. 43M. PARK RIVER, HARTFORD, CONN. Location. On the Park River in the City of Hartford, Hartford County, Connecticut. (See Geological Survey map of Hartford North, Connecticut.) Existing project. Authorized as a modification to completed Hartford, Conn. local protection project. (For details on completed project see Annual Report for 1960). Two sections of reinforced concrete conduit totalling 2,569 feet with width of 34 feet and height of 26.5 feet on the Park River; one sections of reinforced concrete conduit 103 feet long, 36 feet wide and 27.5 feet high on the South Branch; two sections of reinforced concrete conduit 1,364 feet long, 22 feet wide and 25 feet high on the North Branch; a reinforced concrete junction structure to combine the flows from the North and South Branches and distribute them to the Park River and auxiliary conduits and thence to the Connecticut River; circular auxiliary conduit approximately 9,200 feet long to be constructed as a deep tunnel in rock with an inside diameter of 22 feet and lined with 9-inch thick precast concrete walls, an inlet structure and an outlet structure; a concrete headwall at the entrance to the North Branch conduit extension; and two pumping stations on the banks of the Park River. The latest approved cost estimate (October 1980) for new work is $1,300,000 for lands including relocations and $59,600,000 for construction, a total of $60,900,000. Total includes local costs of $1,200,000 for lands and $100,000 for relocations, a total of $1,300,000. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Provide all lands, easements and rights-ofway for construction and operation of project; hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction works; maintain and operate all works after completion; upon completion of conduit construction replace pavements, sidewalks, drainage and other appurtenances, including those at Broad Street, Flower Street and Laurel Street and bear cost of removal replacement and modification to sewers, drains, utilities or highways beyond the area required for excavation and construction of the project; prevent changes in headpool ponding areas which would decrease the effectiveness of the improvements and if ponding areas and capacities are impaired, promptly substitute equivalent storage capacity; and undertake all practical measures to prevent pollution from entering the Park River conduit system. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: The continuing contract for the construction of the box conduit extension, pumping stations and junction structure is complete. Contract earnings for the fiscal year were $141,026 for a total of $25,925,026. Four relocation contracts were completed and earnings for the fiscal year totalled $473,959. Final costs for the relocations totalled $809,459. The auxiliary conduit tunnel contract was completed. Fiscal year earnings were $2,789,669 for a total of $23,736,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Physical construction is completed. Resolution of claims and administrative close-out to be accomplished. 43N. SALMON RIVER, COLCHESTER, CONN. Location. The towns of Colchester and East Hampton are located in the western section of New London County, approximately 14 miles southeast of Hartford, Connecticut. From its headwaters in Bolton, Connecticut, the Salmon River flows southeasterly for 20 miles to its confluence with the Connecticut River in East Hampton, Connecticut, about 4 miles downstream of the problem area at the Colchester-East Hampton town line. Existing project. Provides for the construction of 250 feet of "Doublewal" precast concrete block slope protection along the right bank of the river adjacent to the Brown's Mill Road. The total estimated cost is $235,000. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Local interests would provide, without cost to the United States, all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and utility relocations necessary for project construction, operation and maintenance of the project, except where such damages are due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; maintain and operate the project after completion without cost to the United States in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army; annual operation and maintenance costs will be equally divided by the two towns. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Preparation of plans and specifications was completed. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction is scheduled to begin in fiscal year 1982. 430. SURRY MOUNTAIN LAKE, N.H. Location. Dam is on Ashuelot River, 34.6 miles above its junction with Connecticut River and 5 miles north of Keene, N.H. (See Geological Survey maps for Keene and Bellows Falls, N.H. - vt.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Cost of new work for completed project is $2,448,610 for construction and $385,000 for lands and damages, a total of $2,833,610. Total includes $140,000 for additional recreation facilities. 1-15 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for construction of additional recreation facilities. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in August 1939 and completed in June 1942. Initial phase of additional recreational facilities completed in September 1969, secondary phase in 1980. 43P. TOWNSHEND LAKE, VT. Location. Dam is on West River, 19.1 miles above its junction with Connecticut River at Brattleboro, Vt., and about 2 miles west of Townshend, Vt. Reservoir extends upstream about 4 miles. (See Geological Survey maps - Saxtons River, Vt., and Londenderry, Vt.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Cost of new work for completed project was $5,530,000 for construction and $1,870,000 for lands and damages including highway relocations and utilities, a total of $7,400,000. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in November 1958 and completed in June 1961. Initial phase of additional recreational facilities completed in October 1969. Secondary phase completed in September 1971. 43Q. TULLY LAKE, MASS. Location. Dam is on East Branch of Tully River, 3.9 miles above its junction with Millers River. It is 1 mile north of Fryville, Mass., and 3.5 miles north of Athol, Mass. (See Geological Survey map for Royalston, Mass. - N.H.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Total cost of new work is $1,298,800 for construction and $368,000 for lands and damages, a total of $1,666,800. Total includes $40,000 as local share of recreational facilities. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Local interests must also bear 50 percent of future recreational development, in accordance with 1965 Federal Water Proiect Recreational Act. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. Condition at end offiscal year. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in March 1947 and completed in September 1949. 43R. UNION VILLAGE DAM, VT. Location. Dam is on Ompompanosuc River 4 miles above its junction with Connecticut River. It is one-fourth mile north of Union Village, Vt., and 11 miles north of White River Junction, Vt. (See Geological Survey maps for Strafford, Vt., and Mount Cube, N.H. - Vt.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Total cost for new work is $3,186,860 and $908,300 for lands and damages, a total of $4,095,160. Total includes $84,462 for recreation facilities. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: The contract for construction of restrooms awarded in fiscal year 1979 was completed. Total contract costs were $84,462. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete. Construction of dam was initiated in March 1947 and completed in June 1950. 44. HOUSATONIC RIVER BASIN, CONN. Authorized improvements in Housatonic River Basin are comprised of seven flood control reservoirs on tributaries of the Naugatuck River, principal tributary of Housatonic River, and six local protection projects, five of which are along Naugatuck River and one on Still River. Naugatuck and Housatonic Rivers converge 12 miles above mouth of Housatonic River. A project for emergency snagging and clearing of the Blackberry River, a tributary of the Housatonic River, was authorized under authority contained in Section 208 of the 1954 Flood Control Act. Emergency bank protection projects at Alford, Green River, Massachusetts and at Sheffield, Mass, and Salisbury, Ct. along the Housatonic were authorized under authority provided by Section 14 of the 1948 Flood Control Act. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project; also Table 1-K on dams and reservoirs and local protection projects for Housatonic River Basin.) 44A. BLACK ROCK LAKE, CONN. Location. Damsite is on Branch Brook about 2 miles upstream from its confluence with Naugatuck River in towns of Thomaston and Watertown, Conn. (See Geological Survey map for Thomaston, Conn.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Cost for new work for completed project was $5,223,700 for construction and $2,958,600 for lands and damages, including roads and utilities relocation, a total of $8,182,300. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. However, local interests must establish encroachment lines downstream of dam to permit efficient reservoir operation. State legislation requires establishment of such lines. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete. Road relocation completed in November 1967. Contract for construction of dam and appurtenances was awarded in July 1967 and completed in July 1971. 44B. HANCOCK BROOK LAKE, CONN. Location. Dam is on Hancock Brook in town in Plymouth, Conn., about 3.4 miles above its confluence with Naugatuck River. (See Geological Survey map for Waterbury, Conn.) Existing project. For description of completed improvements and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Cost of new work for completed project was $1,595,000 for construction and $2,585,000 for lands and damages including relocation of roads and railroads, a total of $4,180,000. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. However, local interest are specifically required to establish encroachment lines downstream of dam to permit efficient reservoir operation. Fully complied with. 1-16 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant structures was initiated in July 1963 and completed in August 1966. 44C. HOP BROOK LAKE, CONN. Location. Damsite is on Hop Brook in city of Waterbury and towns of Middlebury and Naugatuck, Conn., about 1.4 miles upstream of confluence of Naugatuck River and Hop Brook. (See Geological Survey map for Waterbury, Conn.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Latest approved cost estimate for new work is $2,708,100 for construction and $3,450,000 for lands, rights-of-way, and relocation of roads, a total of $6,158,100. Total includes $125,000 for recreation facilities. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. However, local interests must establish encroachment lines downstream of dam to permit efficient reservoir operation. State legislation requires establishment of such lines. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for construction of additional recreational facilities. Construction of dam and appurtenant structures was initiated in December 1965 and completed in December 1968. Construction of a public use facility was completed in November 1973. Construction of an additional restroom was completed in 1980. 44D. HOUSATONIC RIVER, PITTSFIELD, MASS. Location. The city of Pittsfield is located in Berkshire County, approximately 6 miles east of the Massachusetts-New York border and about 40 miles northwest of Springfield, Massachusetts, where the confluence of the East and West Branch Housatonic Rivers form the headwaters of the main stem. Existing project. Supplement the existing 8 foot high by 15 foot wide stone arch culvert under the Penn Central Railroad embankment with a new 15 foot diameter pipe culvert. Construct an improved channel by clear cutting the existing stream bank extending about 2,000 feet upstream from the railroad culvert. The total estimated cost is $528,000 of which $85,000 is non- Federal cost. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Local interests are required to provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, rights-ofway, utility relocations or alterations, highway or highway bridge construction; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction, operation and maintenance of the project, except where such damages are due to fault of the United States or its contractors; maintain and operate the project after completion without cost to the United Stated in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army; prevent future encroachment which might interfere with proper functioning of the project for flood control. Formal assurances will be requested during final design. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Detailed Project Report was completed. Report approved and project authorized for construction. Condition at end of fiscal year. Preparation of plans and specifications not yet initiated. 44E. HOUSATONIC RIVER, SALISBURY, CONN. Location. Salisbury is located in Litchfield County which is in the northwest corner of Connecticut about 10 miles south of Great Barrington. This is a rural area geared primarily to an agricultural economy; however, there is industry in the area and there is a very popular recreation and vacation area nearby in the Berkshire Hills. Salisbury is serviced by two highways, 41 and 44. Existing project. The emergency bank protection project consists of the construction of the gabionade with riprap for control of current bank erosion along Dugway Road at two different locations contiguous to the Housatonic River east of Salisbury. The current project cost is $96,700. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: An emergency bank protection contract awarded in January 1981 was completed. Total contract costs were $70,880. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete. 44F. HOUSATONIC RIVER, SHEFFIELD, MASS. Location. The town of Sheffield is primarily a rural community, located in the southwestern corner of Berkshire County, about 7.5 miles east of the Massachusetts-New York stateline and about 4.2 miles north of the Massachusetts-Connecticut stateline. Existing project. The emergency bank protection project provides for construction of a stone slope and the removal of approximately 3500 cubic yards of material from a gravel bar located along the east bank. The project provides protection to a section of roadway situated along the outside of a bend in the Housatonic River. The current project cost is $202,608. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation.. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: An emergency bank protection contract awarded in February 1981 was completed. Total contract costs were $120,920. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete. 44G. NORTHFIELD BROOK LAKE, CONN. Location. Dam is on Northfield Brook about 1.3 miles upstream from its confluence with Naugatuck River, in town of Thomaston, Conn. (See Geological Survey map for Thomaston, Conn.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Cost of new work for completed project was $1,856,000 for construction and $975,000 for lands and damages, including roads and utility relocations, a total of $2,831,000. An estimate of $30,000 for recreation facilities to be constructed. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. However, local interests must establish encroachment lines downstream of dam to permit efficient reservoir operation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenances was initiated in May 1963 and completed in October 1965. Construction of recreation facilities was initiated in November 1966 and completed in August 1967. Additional facilities are scheduled for fiscal year 1982. 1-17 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 44H. SQUANTZ POND, NEW FAIRFIELD, CONN. Location. New Fairfield is located in western Connecticut adjacent to the New York-Connecticut state line and immediately north of the city of Danbury, Connecticut. Squantz Pond is the westernmost of the Candlewood lakes located in New Fairfield and the adjacent communities of Sherman, New Milford, Brookfield and Danbury. Existing project. Provides for a timber bulkhead varying in height up to 4 feet above the beach surface and constructed of 3" x 12" pressure treated timbers. The below grade portion of the bulkhead would be back filled with gravel and provided with sand on the beach side. The total estimated cost (September 1981) is $95,000. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Local interests would provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, rights-of-way and utility relocations necessary for project construction; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction, operation and maintenance of the project, except where such damages are due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; maintain and operate the project after completion without cost to the United States. Operation and results during fiscal year. New work: Preparation of plans and specifications was completed. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction is scheduled to begin in fiscal year 1982. 441. THOMASTON DAM, CONN. Location. On Naugatuck River about 30.4 miles above its junction with Housatonic River and about 1.6 miles north of Thomaston, Conn. Reservoir extends upstream about 6.4 miles. (See Geological Survey map for Thomaston, Conn.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Cost of new work for completed project was $6,382,000 for construction and $7,900,000 for lands and damages, including highway, railroad, and utility relocations, a total of $14,282,000. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of 1944 applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was started in May 1958 and completed in November 1960. 45. MERRIMACK RIVER BASIN, N.H. AND MASS. Works covered by comprehensive plan are on Merrimack River and its tributaries on New Hampshire and Massachusetts. Flood Control Act of 1936 authorized construction of a system of flood control reservoirs in Merrimack River Basin for reduction of flood heights in Merrimack Valley. Flood Control Act of 1938 approved general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes as approved by Chief of Engineers pursuant to preliminary examinations and surveys authorized by act of June 22, 1936, and modified project to provide in addition to construction of a system of flood control reservoirs, related flood control works which may be found justified by the Chief of Engineers. All operations pertaining to flood control in Merrimack River Basin are now carried on under and reported under projects for individual units of comprehensive plan referred to above. No further expenditures are contemplated under general project for flood control in Merrimack River Basin. for final cost and financial summary, see Annual Report for 1946. A comprehensive plan for development of water resources of the North Nashua River Basin, a principal tributary of the Merrimack River, was authorized by 1966 Flood Control Act substantially in accordance with Senate Document 113, 89th Congress. Plan provides for construction of coordinated system for four reservoirs and three local protection projects for flood protection, water supply, recreation and allied purposes. The 1966 Flood Control Act also authorized construction of Saxonville local protection project substantially in accordance with Senate Document 61, 89th Congress. An emergency bank protection project at Amesbury, Mass. was authorized under authority provided by Section 14 of the 1948 Flood Control Act. (See Table 1-L at end of chapter for reservoirs and related flood control works included for construction under comprehensive plan.) 45A. BLACKWATER DAM, N.H. Location. Dam is on Blackwater River, N.H. 8.2 miles above confluence with Contoocook River and 118.8 miles above mouth of Merrimack River. It is in the town of Webster, just above village of Swetts Mills, 12.5 miles by highway northwest of Concord, N.H. (See Geological Survey maps for Penacook and Mount Kearsarge, N.H.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Cost of new work for completed project was $767,000 for construction and $553,000 for lands and damages, a total of $1,320,000. Total includes an estimated $80,000 for construction of public use facilities. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for construction of public facilities. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in May 1940 and completed in November 1941. 45B. EDWARD MACDOWELL LAKE, N.H. Location. Dam is on Nubanusit Brook, a tributary of Contoocook River, one-half mile upstream from village of West Peterborough, N.H. and 14 miles east of Keene, N.H. (See Geological Survey map for Peterboro and Monadnock, N.H.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Completed cost of project was $1,708,300 for construction and $306,000 for lands and damages, a total of $2,014,300. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operations and maintenance activities. Condition at end offiscal year. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in March 1948 and completed in March 1950. 45C. FRANKLIN FALLS DAM, N.H. Location. Dam is on Pemigewasset River, N.H., main tributary of Merrimack River, and about 2 miles upstream of Franklin, N.H. (See Geological Surlvey maps for Penacook and Holderness, N.H.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Cost of new work for completed project was $6,190,500 for construction and $1,760,000 for lands and damages, a total of $7,950,500. 1-18 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in November 1939 and completed in October 1943. 45D. HOPKINTON-EVERETT LAKE, N.H. Location. Hopkinton Dam is on Contoocook River, N.H., 17.3 miles above its junction with Merrimack River and about one-half mile upstream from village of West Hopkinton. Everett Dam is on Piscataquog River, N.H., 16 miles above its junction with Merrimack River and about 1.3 miles southeast of village of East Weare. Two interconnecting canals were provided to enable the two reservoir areas to function as one. (See Geological Survey map for Hillsboro, N.H., and Concord, N.H.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Cost of new work for completed project was $12,715,400 for construction and $8,737,000 for lands and damages, including relocation of roads, railroads, cemeteries, and utilities, a total of $21,452,400. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Local interests must also bear 50 percent of future recreational development in accordance with 1965 Federal Water Project Recreation Act. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. Condition at end offiscal year. Project is complete. Construction of two dams and appurtenant works was initiated in November 1959 and completed in December 1962. Construction of recreation facilities was initiated in November 1974 and completed in September 1975. 45E. NORTH NASHUA RIVER, MASS. Location. The project is located on the North Nashua River in Fitchburg, Worcester County, in the north central section of Massachusetts about 40 miles west of Boston. (See Geological Survey map for Fitchburg, Mass.) Existing project. Provides for channel improvement and rehabilitation of walls and cribs of existing ERA project at Fitchburg. Includes intermittent sections of channel deepening, bank and slope protection and removal of obstructions for a distance of five miles along the North Nashua River. Improved channel has a safe carrying capacity of 9,000 cfs. The project is an integral unit of the comprehensive water resources development plan for the North Nashua River, a tributary of the Merrimack River. Total cost for new work was $3,223,700. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Contract for construction of channel rehabilitation project, awarded in June 1979 was completed. Total contract costs were $2,675,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete. 45F. PHILLIPS LAKE, MASS. Location. On Phillips Brook one-half mile north of its confluence with the North Nashua River in Fitchburg, Worcester County, Massachusetts about 45 miles west of Boston. (See Geological Survey map for Fitchburg, Mass.) Existing project. Single purpose flood control project consisting of an earth-filled dam, 1,700 feet long having a maximum height of 48 feet. A chute spillway with an ogee weir 200 feet long will be located in left abutment. A concrete inlet structure with an ungated 54-inch opening will conduct normal river flows through the dam. Storage capacity will be approximately 1,600 acre-feet, equal to six inches of runoff from a net drainage area of five square miles. The reservoir would be operated as an integral unit of the comprehensive water resources development plan for the North Nashua River, a tributary of the Merrimack River. The latest approved Federal cost estimate (October 1980) for new work is $750,000 for lands including relocations and $8,250,000 for construction, a total of $9,000,000. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Local interests are required to protect channels downstream of the reservoirs from encroachments which would adversely affect operation of the system; hold and save the United States free from all damages due to water rights claims resulting from construction and operation of the reservoirs; and exercise to the full extent of their legal capability, control against removal of water in the basin which will affect the development of dependable stream regulations. Operation and results during fiscal year. New work: Due to controversy over the authorized flood control plan, an array of potentially feasible structural and non-structural alternatives was developed and presented to local officials and interested individuals. As a result of this coordination, a letter was received from the Mayor of Fitchburg expressing his continued interest in flood control activities along the North Nashua River. A report outlining preliminary study findings was forwarded to the Chief of Engineers in June 1981. This report, which was approved in July 1981, also set forth the work required to complete the reformulation study. Since this approval, study efforts have concentrated on conducting more detailed engineering and economic analysis of plans under consideration. This would lead to selection of the best plan, and if appropriate, recommending it for authorization. Condition at end of fiscal year. The plan of study has been approved and preparation of more detailed plans is underway. 46. NEW BEDFORD, FAIRHAVEN, AND ACUSHNET, MASS. Location. Main harbor barrier is across New Bedford and Fairhaven Harbor in vicinity of Palmer Island. Supplemental dikes and walls are provided in Clark Cove area of New Bedford and Fairhaven. (See Geological Survey maps for New Bedford North, New Bedford South, Marion, and Sconticut Neck, Mass., and Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 249, 252, 1210.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Cost of completed project is $17,997,900 for construction, and $616,500 for lands, right-of-way and relocations, a total of $18,614,400. This total includes local costs of $590,560 for lands and relocations and a $6,513,763 cash contribution. Local cooperation. Local interests had to contribute 30 percent of first cost, including lands and rights-of-way; contribute capitalized value of annual maintenance and operation ($1,520,000) for main harbor barrier; hold the United States free from damages; and maintain and operate improvement except main harbor barrier after completion. Total costs for all requirements of local cooperation were $7,014,323. Local requirements fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is completed. Construction of barrier and appurtenances was initiated in October 1962, and completed in January 1966. Construction of the pumping station was initiated in October 1962 and completed in June 1964. 1-19 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 47. NEW LONDON, CONN. Location. In the city of New London, Conn. about 45 miles southeast of Hartford, Conn., and 50 miles southwest of Providence, R.I. (See Geological Survey map for New London, Conn.) Existing project. The hurricane protection project consists of approximately 715 feet of rock-faced earthfill dike and 800 feet of I-walls around the northerly shore of Shaw Cove and the regrading of approximately 21 acres of land along the west shore of the Cove to elevation 12.5 feet mean sea level. Top of dike and floodwalls will be 14.5 feet mean sea level. Appurtenant structures will include a street gate, pressure conduit and a pumping station to discharge interior drainage. Latest estimate (October 1980) for the project is $9,100,000 for construction and $1,100,000 for lands and damages including relocations, a total of $10,200,000 for new work. Total includes local costs of $1,100,000 for lands and relocations and a $1,960,000 cash contribution. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Local interests must: (a) Provide lands and rights-of-way for construction; (b) make alterations and relocations; (c) bear 30 percent of construction cost with credit allowed for (a) and (b); (d) hold the United States free from damages; and (e) maintain and operate all works. Estimated costs to local interests are $1,100,000 for lands and relocations and a cash contribution of $1,960,000, a total of $3,060,000. Assurances have been provided. Operations and results duringfiscal year. New work: Design of remainder of project was continued. The contract on Part II - Dike and appurtenant structures was completed. Total contract earnings were $3,317,000. A contract was awarded in September 1981 for Part III - pressure conduit in the amount of $929,155. No work was accomplished on this contract. Condition at end offiscal year. Construction is underway. 48. SAINT JOHN RIVER BASIN, MAINE Comprehensive plan for water resources development within the basin is comprised of the multiple-purpose Dickey and Lincoln School Reservoirs on the upper Saint John River. Projects were authorized by Flood Control Act of 1965 substantially in accordance with plans included in report of Department of Interior and Corps of Engineers dated August 1964 which is supplement to July 1963 report of International Passamaquoddy Tidal Power Project and Upper Saint John River Hydroelectric Power Development. Local protection project at Fort Kent authorized by Chief of Engineers on 25 September 1975 Flood Control Act. (See Table 1-P at end of chapter for other authorized multiple-purpose projects including power.) 48A. DICKEY-LINCOLN SCHOOL LAKES, MAINE Location. On Upper Saint John River near village of Dickey, Maine, about 340 miles north of Boston, Mass. (See Geological Survey map for Allagash, Maine.) Existing project. Plan consists of Dickey and Lincoln School Reservoirs functioning as a single coordinated unit. Dickey Dam, on Saint John River immediately above its confluence with the Allagash River, would consist of two rolled earthfill embankments about 10,200 feet total length with maximum height of 335 feet. Five earthfilled perimeter dikes acting in conjunction with the dam would impound a reservoir with total capacity of 7,700,000 acre-feet of which 2,900,000 acre-feet would be actively utilized for power and flood control purposes. Reservoir area at maximum operating level is 86,000 acres and its upper reaches extend into the Canadian Province of Quebec. Power facilities would be provided at the dam consisting of 4 units at 190,000 kilowatts each, one of which would be a reversible unit, for total of 760,000 kilowatts. The outlet works would include two 26 foot diameter tunnels; a low level diversion tunnel at streambed elevation and an intermediate level tunnel approximately 110 feet above streambed. A chute-type spillway with 600-foot long curved crest would be located between the two embankments. Drainage area controlled is 2,725 square miles. Basic provisions would be included in the initial project to accommodate future installation of two additional 190,000 kilowatt reversible units at Dickey. Provisions include excavation of forebay and tailrace channels, construction of headworks and powerhouse foundation, and increasing the height of Lincoln School Dam. Lincoln School Dam, 11 miles downstream from Dickey Dam, would consist of an earthfill embankment, a powerhouse in the right abutment, and a gated spillway structure between the embankment and powerhouse. Overall length would be 2,100 feet and maximum height 90 feet. Power facilities would include two 30,000 kilowatt units and one 10,000 kilowatt unit for a total 70,000 kilowatts. Concrete spillway structure would be 294 feet long and contain four 60- by 50-foot taintor gates. A public highway would be constructed across the dam and spillway. The reservoir would have 32,450 acre-feet of usable storage for regulation of Dickey Dam discharges, power pondage and afterbay storage for the Dickey pumpback operations. Drainage area above Lincon School is 4,086 square miles. Approved estimate (October 1980) for new work is $61,150,000 for land including relocations and $652,850,000 for construction, a total of $714,000,000. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. No local cooperation requirements were stipulated in the authorizing document. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Advance engineering and design activities were continued. Efforts concentrated on the completion of preconstruction planning consisting of environmental studies, design of early construction features and detailed real estate investigations and planning. A Fish and Wildlife mitigation report was finalized and submitted to the Secretary of the Army for transmittal to Congress. Transmission and related environmental impact studies were completed. A final Environmental Impact Statement was filed with EPA. Environmental studies to identify the project's impact on Canada's natural and physical environment were completed and a final report was transmitted to the State Department. Field surveys and subsurface investigations for proposed highway relocations were completed and preparation of final designs, plans and specifications was initiated. Real estate efforts to address planning of communities relocations was continued. Real estate mapping and title evidence investigations were initiated. Four major and several smaller preconstruction planning contracts totalling about $447,000 were awarded during the fiscal year. In addition four job changes totalling over $223,000 were added to previously awarded contracts. Work orders totalling over $23,000 were issued to other Government agencies for water quality and streamflow data. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction has not been started. Advance engineering and design to complete preconstruction planning is being continued. 49. STAMFORD, CONN. Location. In Fairfield County on north shore of Long Island Sound, about 30 miles east of New York City and 20 miles southwest of Bridgeport, Conn. (See Geological Survey map for Stamford, Conn.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement see Annual Report for 1974. Latest approved estimate for new work is $10,066,000 for construction, and $1,880,000 for lands and damages and relocations, a total of $11,946,000. Total includes local costs of $1,183,000 for lands and damages and a cash contribution of $3,368,000. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act 1-20 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Local interests will provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; make modifications to existing storm drainage system which may be required to obtain full benefits of protection plan, all necessary modifications to existing sanitary sewer facilities required to prevent entry of tidal-waters, and all changes, alterations and additions to or relocations of any buildings and utilities made necessary by construction of project; bear 30 percent of total first cost, estimated at $3,584,000 and consisting of cost of items listed above plus a cash contribution estimated at $2,488,000; contribute in cash, in lieu of cost of annual maintenance and operation of tidal portion of East Branch barrier which is to be operated and maintained by the United States, an amount presently estimated at $880,000; maintain and operate all works after completion with exception of tidal portion of East Branch barrier and aids to navigation; and hold the United States free from damages. Assurances received and cash contributions have been deposited. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activity. Condition at end of fiscal year. Final audit has been completed, however final project cost for computation of the 30% portion to be borne by the city of Stamford has yet to be determined. Major factor affecting final project cost will be settlement of the interest claim case now pending in court. 50. THAMES RIVER BASIN, CONN., R.I., AND MASS. Works covered by this plan are a series of dams and reservoirs on tributaries of Thames River in Massachusetts and Connecticut, within a radius of 45 miles form Norwich, Conn., and a channel enlargement on Shetucket River where it discharges into Thames River at Norwich. Flood Control Act of August 18, 1941, approved plan for a system of reservoirs and channel improvements in Thames River Basin in accordance with House Document 885, 76th Congress, 3d session, and authorized $6 million for initiation and partial accomplishment of project. Flood Control Act of December 22, 1944, authorized completion of approved plan. Flood Control Act of July 14, 1960, authorized project for West Thompson Reservoir, substantially as recommended in Senate Document 41, 86th Congress, 2d session. (See Table 1-M at end of chapter on reservoirs and local protection districts, Thames River Basin, for projects comprising approved plan.) 50A. BUFFUMVILLE LAKE, MASS. Location. Dam is on Little River, 1.3 miles above its junction with French River and 8 miles northeast of Southbridge, Mass. Reservoir extends upstream about 1.7 miles northerly and 1.9 miles southerly. (See Geological Survey maps - Webster, Mass. and Conn., and Leicester, Mass.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report of 1975. Cost of new work for completed project was $2,157,600 for construction and $841,000 for lands and damages including highway relocations, a total of $2,998,600. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordina2 operation and maintenance activities. Condition at end offiscal year. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in September 1956 and compl ,d in June 1958. 50B. EAST BRIMFIELD LAKE, MASS. Location. Dam is on Quinebaug River, 64.5 miles above its confluence with Shetucket River and 1 mile southwest of village of Fiskdale, Mass. (See Geological Survey maps - Whales, Mass. and Conn., Southbridge, Mass. and Conn., East Brookfield, Mass., and Warren, Mass.) Existing project. For description of cotnpleted improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Cost of new work for completed project was $1,337,000 for construction and $5,720,000 for lands and damages including highway relocations, a total of $7,057,000. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. Condition at end offiscal year. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in May 1958 and completed in June 1960. 50C. HODGES VILLAGE DAM, MASS. Location. Dam is on French River, 15 miles above its confluence with Quinebaug River, at Hodges Village in town of Oxford, Mass., about 5 miles north of Webster, Mass. (See Geological Survey maps for Webster, Mass., and Conn., Leicester, Mass., Worcester South, Mass., and Oxford, Mass.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Cost of new work for completed project was $1,317,100 for construction and $3,144,000 for lands and damages including highway, railroad, and utility relocation, a total of $4,461,100. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Local interests must also bear 50 percent of future recreational development in accordance with 1965 Federal Water Project Recreation Act. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. Condition at end offiscal year. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works, initiated in March 1958, was completed in December 1959. 50D. MANSFIELD HOLLOW LAKE, CONN. Location. Dam is at Mansfield Hollow, Conn., on Natchaug River, 5.3 miles above its confluence with Willimantic River. It is 4 miles northeast of city of Willimantic, Conn. (See Geological Survey maps for Spring Hill and Willimantic, Conn.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Cost of new work for completed project was $4,108,000 for construction and $2,340,000 for lands and damages, a total of $6,448,000. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. Condition at end offiscal year. Project is complete. Construction of dam, initiated in 1949, was completed in May 1952. 50E. WEST THOMPSON LAKE, CONN. Location. Dam is on Quinebaug River in town of Thompson, Conn. Site is in village of West Thompson, 2 miles upstream from city of Putnam, Conn. (See Geological Survey map, Putnam, Conn.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Cost of 1-21 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 new work for completed project was $5,008,200 for construction and $1,965,000 for lands, damages and road relocations, a total of $6,973,200. Total includes $58,000 for recreation facilities. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete. Construction of dam, road relocation, and appurtenances was initiated in August 1963 and completed in October 1965. Initial phase of recreation facilities was completed in May 1976. 50F. WESTVILLE LAKE, MASS. Location. Dam is on Quinebaug River, 56.7 miles above its confluence with Shetucket River, in towns of Sturbridge and Southbridge, Mass., and 1.3 miles west of center of Southbridge. (See Geological Survey maps - Southbridge, Mass. and R.I., and East Brookfield, Mass.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Cost of new work for completed project was $2,285,000 for construction, and $3,400,000 for lands and damages (including relocation of highways, utilities, cemeteries, and structures), a total of $5,685,000. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is completed. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in April 1960 and completed in August 1962. 51. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS In accordance with provisions of the Flood Control act of 1936, as amended, local flood protection works constructed with Federal funds are transferred to local interests to operate and maintain. To insure compliance with regulations prescribed for their operation and maintenance, regular inspections of the following projects were made during the fiscal year. Connecticut: October 1980 and May 1981 - Winsted, Torrington, Waterbury/Watertown, Hall Meadow Brook, East Branch, Mad River, Sucker Brook, Pawcatuck, Ansonia, Derby, Norwalk, Stamford, Hartford, E. Hartford, and Wethersfield. Maine: October 1980 and June 1981 - Cherryfield, Fort Kent, Indian Island, Beals Island, Harpswell, Blaine, Lubec and Whiting. Massachusetts: October 1980 and May 1981 - Canton, Scituate, Three Rivers, Ware, West Springfield, West Warren, Amesbury, Haverhill, Lowell, Lancaster, Gardner, Worcester, Blackstone, Northampton, Holyoke, Springfield; October 1980 and June 1981 - Weymouth, Braintree, Chicopee, Chicopee Falls; November 1980 and June 1981 - Hayward Creek, Charles River Dam; November 1980 and May 1981- Lee and Saxonville. New Hampshire: October 1980 and May 1981 - Charlestown, Wilton, West Stewartstown, Lincoln, Shelburne, Nashua, Keene. October 1980 and June 1981- Farmington. Rhode Island: October 1980 and May 1981- Woonsocket. Vermont: October 1980 and May 1981 - Weston. 52. FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS Operations of completed Corps flood control projects during the fiscal year, including Corps operated reservoirs, hurricane barriers and local protection projects accounted for damages prevented benefits of $52.3 million. The bulk of these benefits were associated with the February 1981 flood. A coordinated system of reservoirs, many of which are multipurpose in nature, and all containing significant amounts of storage for flood control purposes, has been established in five major flood producing basins in New England. During periods of flood flows, regulation of reservoirs is fully coordinated within each basin dependent upon its location in the watershed, its available storage capacity and origin of flood. In addition to flood control releases, water supply and flow augmentation releases were made from selected reservoirs. After a very cold and dry early winter, most of southern New England experienced above normal temperatures, coincident with almost steady rainfall during the period 20-27 February. Rainfall totals at Corps projects for this period ranged from about 3.5 to more than 7 inches. River levels resulting from this storm reached near bankfull capacity in many areas of the Connecticut and Merrimack River basins. Peak levels on the Connecticut River (22.0 feet at Hartford, Ct.) and on the Merrimack River (52 feet at Lowell, Ma.) were only and 1 foot below C of E flood stage, respectively. High river flows were further complicated in many areas of the upper Connecticut River basin by unusually heavy amounts of ice cover in the rivers. Because ice jams reduced channel capacities, many reservoirs impounded water longer than normal resulting in substantial flood control storage being utilized at several projects. As a result of regulation, Corps reservoirs and local protection projects prevented damages of $47,900,000 in the Connecticut, $1,150,000 in the Merrimack, $2,700,000 in the Naugatuck and $82,000 in the Thames. Connecticut River Basin. During the February event flood control storage amounted to 70 percent of capacity at Townshend, 59 percent at Knightville, 52 percent at Ball Mountain, 47 percent at Littleville and 40 percent at North Springfield. At Townshend, this storage represents the most since the project was completed. Other reservoirs in the basin stored between 10 and 23 percent of capacity. The following projects were regulated for white water canoeing: Ball Mountain-October 1980 and May 1981; Knightville-April and May 1981; Littleville-April 1981; Birch Hill-April 1981 and Tully- April 1981. Water and fish releases were made at Colebrook Lake throughout the year. During the fiscal year, July-September, the pools of Tully and Littleville Lakes were each raised 3 feet to provide emergency drought storage for local communities anticipating shortages of domestic water supplies. Thames River Basin. Storages utilized at reservoirs in the Thames River Basin during the February flooding ranged between 10 and 27 percent of capacities. Mansfield Hollow was regulated for canoe races in June 1981, and West Thompson lake was the site on several occasions during this period for AKC retriever trials. In addition, the pool was raised 2 feet from June to September to provide about 930 acre-feet of emergency drought storage for the Willimantic water supply. Merrimack River Basin. Peak storage capacities utilized by reservoirs in the Merrimack River Basin ranged from 14 percent at Hopkinton and Everett to 24 percent at Franklin Falls. Housatonic River Basin. Reservoirs in the Housatonic were regulated during the February flood, resulting in utilization of22 percent of flood control storage capacity at Thomaston, 18 percent at Black Rock and 17 percent at Hop Brook. Storages at unmanned reservoirs in the basin ranged between 9 and 14 percent of storage 1-22 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION capacity. The pool at Black Rock lake was raised 2 feet from July to September, to provide emergency drought storage for use by a downstream water supply. 53. HURRICANE BARRIER OPERATIONS Four hurricane barriers located along the southern coast of New England protect coastal communities from tidal flooding associated with hurricanes or severe coastal storms. The Corps operates the navigational elements of the Stamford, Connecticut and New Bedford-Fairhaven, Massachusetts barriers. The Fox Point, Rhode Island and Pawcatuck, Connecticut barriers are operated by the local communities. A brief resume of operations for the fiscal year follows: Stamford Barrier. The barrier gate was closed on 5 occasions due to coastal storms. Total benefits for the fiscal year amounted to $500,000. New Bedford-Fairhaven Barrier. The barrier gates were closed on 1 occasion during the year. Total benefits for the fiscal year amounted to $50,000. Fox Point and Pawcatuck Barriers. There were no operations at these barriers during fiscal year. 54. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 1-N at end of chapter.) 55. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (pre-authorization). (See Table 1-0 at end of chapter.) Snagging and clearing activities pursuant to Section 208 of the 1954 Flood Control Act. Pocasset River, Cranston, R.I. Fiscal year costs were $395. Emergency Bank Protection activities pursuant to Section 14 of 1946 Flood Control Act. Fiscal year costs were as follows: Blackstone R. Canal, Northbridge, Mass. Clam Cove, Rockport, Me. Connecticut R., No. Stratford, N.H. (See Section 43K. of Text) Connecticut R., Northampton, Mass. Easton Point, Middletown, R.I. Hancock, Me. Housatonic R., Salisbury, Conn. (See Section 44E. of Text) Housatonic R., Sheffield, Mass. (See Section 44F. of Text) Indian Well State Park, Shelton, Conn. Island Ave., Quincy, Mass. Lake Waramaug State Park, Kent, Conn. Little R., Westfield, Mass. Long Beach Drive, Stamford, Conn. Pine Creek Point, Fairfield, Conn. Popplestone Beach, Jonesport, Me. Salmon River, Colchester, Conn. (See Section 43N. of Text) Sandy River, New Sharon, Me. Seaside Park, Bridgeport, Conn. Squantz Pond, New Fairfield, Conn. (See Section 44H. of Text) $5,000 4,100 35,173 2,300 3,000 3,500 79,495 155,734 4,800 12,695 5,000 4,000 5,000 1,200 5,000 30,736 4,900 5,000 31,044 West Branch, Westfield River, Huntington, Mass. 9,387 West Branch, Westfield River, Mass. 4,300 Westfield River, Chesterfield, Mass. 5,000 Emergency flood control activities - repair, flood fighting, and rescue work. (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation). Federal costs for fiscal year were $141,166 for disaster preparedness. Streambank erosion control evaluation and demonstration act of 1974 as amended in 1976 (Section 32 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1974. P.L. 93-251). Costs for the fiscal year were $459,014 for demonstration project proposals. Total cost to 30 September 1981 were $1,107,842. Flood Insurance Activities (Section 1301-1377, Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968, Public Law 90-448 as amended). In coordination with flood control activities, work was completed on 22 flood insurance studies and continued on two others in accordance with Inter-Agency Agreement (IAA) H-10-77. Costs for the fiscal year were $23,292 under Housing and Urban Development reimbursable orders. 56. DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS No projects were deauthorized during fiscal year. (See Table 1-Q at end of chapter.) General Investigations 57. SURVEYS Costs for the fiscal year for surveys from regular funds were $3,534,522 of which $713,633 was for navigation surveys; $971,131 for flood damage prevention studies; $199,849 for coordination studies; $525,653 for special studies; $772,353 for comprehensive studies; $128,938 for restudy of deferred projects; $202,718 for review of completed projects; $7,691 for deauthorized review program and $2,556 for supplemental pre-authorization studies. 58. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA The Division Engineer is the U.S. member on Saint Croix River Board of Control. Annual inspections are made of conditions on the Saint Croix River and a continuing program of compilation of basic hydrologic information is carried out. Division Engineer's representatives during the past year kept closely in touch with developments in the basin and cooperated with their Canadian counterparts assisting in development of basins' resources. Total costs for the fiscal year were $7,636. Total costs to 30 September 1981 were $124,967. Flood plain studies comprise compilation and dissemination, upon responsible local request, of information on floods and potential flood damages, including identification of areas subject to inundation by floods of various magnitudes and frequencies, and general criteria for guidance in use of flood plain area; and engineering advice to local interests for their use in planning to ameliorate flood hazard. Total costs for the fiscal year were $202,555. Total costs to 30 September 1981 were $4,113,867. Total costs for Hydrologic Studies for the fiscal year were $2,575. Total costs for the National Program of Inspection of Dams for the fiscal year were $2,822,636 of which $2,722,402 was for inspection and $100,234 was for inventory. 1-23 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 1-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Project 1. Andrews River, Mass. 2. Aquatic Plant Control 3. Boston Harbor, Mass. 4. Bridgeport Harbor, Conn. 5. Bristol Harbor, Bristol, R.I. 6. Cape Cod Canal Mass. 7. Chatham (Stage) Harbor, Mass. 8. Clinton Harbor, Conn. 9. Connecticut River below Hartford, Conn. Funding New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Minor rehab. Approp. Cost Major rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major rehab. Approp. Cost Total Cost to FY78 FY79 FY80 FY81 September 30, 1981 58,152 13,113 102,686 -2,000 58,078 13,187 12,831 87,710 101 7,000 6,951 7,000 10,000 6,582 5,584 219,042 52 219,042 52 379,898 379,753 160,496 155,613 - - - - 25,313,083 1 - - - - 25,313,083 1 113,989 132,797 74,675 82,023 6,648,8152 118,775 130,531 13,941 143,195 6,646,5192 - - - - 4,491,119 38 - - - - 4,491,119 38 27,892 49,912 65,378 40,931 1,772,976 40 27,892 47,912 63,856 44,406 1,772,929 40 - 50,000 100,000 75,000 225,000 - 34,997 83,452 89,372 207,821 - - - 53,000 32,695,750 4'* - - - 45,368 32,688,118 ', 3,275,275 2,849,417 3,049,400 3,185,120 59,909,488 3,106,240 3,203,731 2,532,814 3,149,829 59,238,276 - - - - 390,677 - - - - 390,677 - 875,000 6,850,000 9,240,000 18,260,000 - 704,115 6,800,607 9,437,523 18,237,245 - - - - 266,705 " - - - - 266,705 " 215,500 -5,800 15,558 36,623 1,375,282 55 212,634 -2,250 15,558 6,334 1,344,993 5 4,497 4,497 - - - 104,957 - - - 104,957 - 22,352 33,130 497,734 - 22,352 22,280 486,884 - - - 1,541,185 10o, - - - 1,541,185 10,11 233,589 763,534 83,500 790,000 9,743,166 12 566,782 668,969 226,380 589,547 9,537,224 12 - - - - 60,000 - - - - 60,000 1-24 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY78 FY79 FY80 FY81 September 30, 1981 10. Corea Harbor, New Work Gouldsboro, Me. 11. Fall River, Harbor, Mass. (Regular Funds) Contributed Funds (Other) 12. Fore River, Braintree & Weymouth, Mass. 13. Gloucester Harbor, Annisquam River, Mass. 14. Green Harbor, Mass. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 15. Guilford Harbor, Conn. 16. Hampton Harbor, N.H. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 17. Island End River, New Work Chelsea, Mass. Approp. Cost (Contributed Funds- New Work Required) Approp. Cost (Other Contributed New Work Funds) Approp. Cost 18. Jonesport Harbor, New Work Me. Approp. Cost 40,000 47,000 30,000 25,000 34,317 47,991 25,511 34,075 -1,782 - - 325,000 4,132 1,089 11,005 294,647 46,000 499,692 30,332 27,941 36,959 414,605 125,605 27,941 - 37,200 - - - 35,150 2,050 - 50,000 44,000 26,939 58,000 44,074 43,546 11,216 35,352 176,407 176,301 73,150 73,150 5,892,726 14 5,856,832 14 1,964,098 15 1,964,098 15 37,200 37,200 182,739 137,852 - - - - 1,296,934 56 - - - - 1,296,934 56 27,197 17,440 4,584 141,907 1,322,021 27,197 17,440 4,584 141,547 1,321,661 - - - -6,988 254,512 - - - -70 254,512 3,314 12,000 282,000 110,000 957,805 3,627 10,605 204,257 167,204 934,911 - - 4,000 - 168,000 - - - 73 158,342 - - - - 137,222 57 - - - - 137,222 57 8,445 - - 56,900 514,339 8,445 - - 25,281 482,720 S- -. - 200,000 18 - - - - 200,000 18 15,000 16,244 358,166 35,400 1,236,958 15,074 15.542 30,420 323,.867 1.196.072 - 100,000 21,000 75,000 - 87,884 30,558 34,927 - - - 314,500 - - - 779,000 110,000 90,000 - 15,000 109,985 24,130 59,497 18,924 196,000 153,369 314,500 779,000 215,000 212,536 1-25 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 1-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY78 FY79 FY80 FY81 September 30,1981 17. Island End River, New Work 18. Chelsea, Mass. Approp. Cost (Contributed Funds- New Work Required) Approp. Cost (Other Contributed New Work Funds) Approp. Cost Jonesport Harbor, New Work Me. Approp. Cost 19. Kennebec River, Me. 20. Kennebunk River, Me. 21. Menemsha Creek, Martha's Vineyard, Mass. 22. Milford Harbor, Conn. 23. New Haven Harbor, Conn. 24. Newburyport Harbor, Mass. 25. Norwalk Harbor, Conn. New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost - 100,000 21,000 75,000 - 87,884 30,558 34,927 - - - 314,500 - - - 779,000 196,000 153,369 314,500 779,000 110,000 90,000 - 15,000 215,000 109,985 24,130 59,497 18,924 212,536 S - - 1,599,940 3 - .... - - - 11 ,, 55 99 99, ,9 94 40 0 3 5,875 15,328 46,193 24,000 1,242,226 5,875 15,328 46,193 10,342 1,228,464 - 15,500 14,222 90,000 - 14,112 14,222 22,876 - 29,250 114,000 -2,000 - 28,477 17,254 95,061 17,092 17,092 9,443 184,565 40,000 9,443 21,158 203,406 350,334 58 350,334 58 714,489 647,124 56,926 13 56,926 13 622,346 621,888 90,506 53 90,506 53 573,884 573,884 - - - - 4,205,246 22 - - - - 4,205,246 22 78,415 1,019,527 488,703 91,588 8,179,207 23 64,463 848,846 650,976 111,641 8,175,934 23 - - - - 565,225 - - -- 565,225 4,000 20,542 40,613 589,668 3,353,070 4,457 27,934 43,727 589,732 3,339,435 - - - - 1,415,524 S- - - 1,415,524 - - - - 531,129 . 3' S- - 531,129 31 21,129 150,274 2,141,000 60,500 3,553,971 26 21,129 148,196 741,961 1,185,231 3,277,585 26 1-26 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY78 FY79 FY80 FY81 September 30, 1981 26. Portland Harbor. New Work Maine 27. Portsmouth Harbor and Piscataqua River, Maine and N.H. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 28. Sakonnet Harbor, New Work R.I. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 29. Sesuit Harbor, New Work Mass. Approp. Cost 30. Wellfleet Harbor, New Work Mass. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 35. Oakland Beach, New Work Warwick, R.I. Approp. (Regular Funds) Cost (Contributed New Work Funds) Contrib. Cost 36. Revere Beach, New Work Mass. Approp. Cost 40A. West Hill Dam, New Work Mass. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 41. Charles River New Work Dam, Mass. Approp. (Regular Funds) Cost (Contributed New Work Funds) Contrib. Cost (Other New Work Contributed Contrib. Funds) Cost 42. Charles River New Work (Natural Valley Approp. Storage Areas), Mass. Cost 43A. Ball Mountain New Work Lake, Vt. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost - - - - 9,588,710 28 - - - - 9,588,710 28 44,000 524,200 2,295,000 310,000 5,071,650 21,139 216,525 2,541,651 397,620 5,071,153 - - - - 5,384,043 17 - - - 5,384,043 17 34,347 371,475 130,747 53,288 1,037,369 34,347 368,477 130,461 55,315 1,037,112 50,000 30,000 39,000 50,000 772,478 59 22,983 64,720 36,804 33,656 749,785 59 863 - - - 137,016 863 - - - 137.016 30,000 20,115 21,016 - 18,000 2,032 11,903 24,090 24,373 66,959 494,217 24,090 22,285 13,866 549,327 50,000 61,000 49,000 395,000 47,840 61,728 30,233 416,515 - - - 215,000 - - - 170,382 - 50,000 100,000 105,000 - 10,840 100,892 129,219 122,299 113,622 157,634 20 157,634 20 841,271 841,200 570,000 567,212 215,000 170,382 267,000 21 252,951 21 - - - - 2,306,902 39 - - - - 2,306,902 39 109,600 377,500 149,000 183,600 1,727,884 107,488 189,010 333,118 174,244 1,711,095 875,000 250,000 75,000 - 41,177,000 3,904,484 580,005 5,272 78,935 41,169,362 - - 4,088 - 5,554,088 465,433 343 - - 5,544,640 - 170,000 97,567 - 1,674,567 222,528 150,581 37,136 75,839 1,635,525 1,258,000 1,700,000 985,000 1,033,000 6,435,000 1,366,166 1,693,135 1,303,469 1,037,653 6,394,207 S- - 10,797,962 6 S- - - 10,797,9626 581,200 228,700 465,500 274,500 3,418,139 266,159 542,724 355,720 368,174 3,392,044 1-27 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 1-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY78 FY79 FY80 FY81 September 30, 1981 43B. Barre Falls Dam, Mass. 43C. 43D. Birch Hill Dam, Mass. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) Colebrook River Lake, Conn. 43E. Conant Brook Dam, Mass. 43F. Knightville Dam, Mass. 43G. Lancaster, Israel River, N.H. 43H. LittlevilleLake, Mass. 431. North Hartland Lake, Vt. 43J. North Springfield Lake, Vt. 43K. Connecticut River, No. Stratford, N.H New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost - - - - 1,967,819 - - - - 1,967,819 225,400 172,200 176,500 234,300 2,122,827 227,135 169,593 173,823 219,729 2,100,288 - - - - 4,815,679 4 606 - - - 4,815,679 1 138,300 232,300 193,000 234,900 2,513,527 132,612 187,563 220,530 253,331 2,508,715 32,000 - - - 32,000 30 32,000 - - - 32,000 30 --- - 14,263,971 - - - - 14,263,971 118,500 87,300 219,800 207,200 1,264,044 114,535 83,468 196,652 165,219 1,189,852 - - - - 2,950,530 - - - - 2,950,530 123,800 67,700 47,800 60,800 707,680 116,856 77,373 48,119 57,866 704,296 95,000 -6,000 - - 25,715 63,302 - -- 427,300 151,800 237,000 368,400 259,746 310,200 229,493 271,722 11 11 3 3 3,415,640 44 3,415,640 44 2,858,204 2,732,782 30,000 385,000 -41,000 44,125 535,625 15,835 71,066 184,195 148,932 533,541 - - - - 7,013,412 - - - - 7,013,412 95,600 173,100 237,900 212,600 1,816,291 96,418 150,965 242,928 222,372 1,807,176 80,000 - 1,000 - 7,312,225 50 23,238 56,762 1,000 - 7,312,225 5o 75,900 202,300 483,400 185,500 2,377,515 69,543 203,340 226,211 422,311 2,349,146 - - - - 6,831,526 25 - - - - 6,831,526 25 20,100 231,800 582,600 297,700 3,424,797 12,852 226,554 335,301 518,041 3,377,603 - - - 184,000 184,000 - - - 35,173 35,173 1-28 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Project Funding FY78 FY79 FY80 43L. Otter Brook New Work Lake, N.H. Approp. 43M. Park River, Hartford, Conn. (Regular Funds) (Other Contributed Funds) 43N. Salmon River, Colchester, Conn. 430. Surry Mountain Lake, N.H. 43P. Townsend Lake, Vt. 43Q. Tully Lake, Mass. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds Union Village Dam, Vt. Black Rock Lake, Conn. Hancock Brook Lake, Conn. 44C. Hop Brook Lake, Conn. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 20,000 - - - 79,570 1,232 - - 195,000 190,200 188,000 210,100 185,294 185,232 203,456 196,899 14,776,400 11,975,000 11,455,000 4,365,000 15,469,997 14,010,347 14,423,500 4,836,262 10,000 - 183,000 26,000 27,000 7,500 139,448 61,045 - - 8,000 38,000 - - 7,916 30,736 - 140,000 -3 4,000 - 36,475 103,494 4,028 238,600 199,600 256,000 211,600 234,670 210,814 239,695 217,233 193,600 172,200 294,500 310,000 193,393 177,359 249,637 286,020 -18,000 -157 - - 25,224 662 - - 133,900 168,700 198,400 236,400 132,215 144,382 225,408 232,818 11,535 - - - - 80,000 4,462 - - 42,676 41,786 - 193,900 233,700 182,100 183,200 184,473 183,989 240,142 173,965 142,100 171,600 148,000 137,700 122,070 182,316 138,047 155,370 96,900 48,800 52,800 73,600 81,242 67,201 52,269 74,191 125,000 10,000 8,538 - 29,483 13,770 95,537 4,748 196,300 212,300 335,900 307,300 194,092 203,579 256,604 320,967 1-29 Total Cost to FY81 September 30, 1981 4, 160,448 43 4, 160,448 4 1,969,014 1,955,218 59,595,000 58,945,281 246,000 234,993 46,000 38,652 2,833,610 33 2,833,610 33 2,484,143 2,470,738 7,398,413 49 7,398,413 49 2,984,571 2,910,992 1,666,752 7 1,666,752 7 2,094,586 2,090,865 40,000 30 40,000 30 4,095,160 51 4,095,160 51 2,281,156 2,268,843 8,182,300 8,182,300 1,281,909 1,278,481 4,178,911 4,178,911 695,749 695,666 6,151,562 32 6,151,562 32 1,959,435 1,877,528 43R. 44A. 44B. REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 1-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY78 FY79 FY80 FY81 September 30, 1981 44D. Housatonic River, New Work Pittsfield, Mass. Approp. Cost 44E. Housatonic R., New Work Salisbury, Conn. Approp. Cost 44F. Housatonic R., New Work Sheffield, Mass. Approp. Cost 44G. Northfield Brook New Work Lake, Conn. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 44H. Squantz Pond, New Work New Fairfield, Conn. Approp. Cost 441. Thomaston Dam, New Work Conn. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 45A. Blackwater Dam, New Work N.H. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 45B. Edward MacDowell New Work Lake, N.H. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 45C. Franklin Falls New Work Dam, N.H. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 45D. Hopkinton-Everett New Work Lakes, N.H. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 45E. North Nashua New Work River, Mass. Approp. Cost 45F. Phillips Lake, New Work Mass. Approp. Cost 46. New Bedford, Mass New Work (Regular Funds) Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 70,000 45,000 13,003 28,785 73,430 23,221 2,534 128,000 127,970 - - 18,300 85,000 103,300 - - 17,203 79,495 96,698 - - 67,608 135,000 202,608 - - 46,875 155,733 202,608 - - - - 2,830,512 - - - - 2,830,512 99,600 108,500 100,300 93,700 958,411 88,608 121,474 106,584 88,620 952,688 - - - 89,000 89,000 - - - 31,044 31,044 - - - - 14,282,112 - - - - 14,282,112 80,800 236,600 328,300 219,100 2,590,767 89,688 207,698 322,949 241,387 2,576,196 - - - - 1,319,746 3 - - - - 1,319,746 37 4-7,500 184,400 167,000 199,900 1,851,785 43,221 270,180 169,458 215,952 1,850,797 - - - - 2,014,253 36 - - - - 2,014,253 36 55,000 130,500 222,500 200,800 2,286,192 43,370 141,783 206,652 213,344 2,282,193 - - - - 7,950,487 "3 - - - - 7,950,487 a5 257,500 178,500 478,300 320,400 3,338,037 252,983 193,274 414,820 377,872 3,328,444 - - - - 21,452,440 34 - - - - 21,452,440 3 330,000 302,200 334,000 378,600 3,637,340 334,353 315,696 331,016 325,239 3,578,547 60,000 1,350,000 1,550,000 75,000 3,275,000 27 69,364 904,611 1,933,063 98,196 3,223,702 150,000 - - 150,000 300,000 3,115 58,162 57,800 175,602 294,679 - - - - 11,510,088 - - - - 11,510,088 228,800 113,800 111,000 120,700 1,974,114 117,036 226,324 103,825 114,792 1,956,458 1-30 11 2 1 1 1 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY78 FY79 FY80 FY81 September 30, 1981 (Contributed Funds) 47. New London, Conn. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) (Other Contributed Funds) 48A. Dickey-Lincoln School Lakes, Me. 49. Stamford, Conn. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds (Other Contributed Funds) 50A. Buffumville Lake, Mass. 50B. East Brimfield Lake, Mass. 50C. Hodges Village Dam, Mass. 50D. Mansfield Hollow Lake, Conn. 50E. West Thompson Lake, Conn. New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost - - - - 6,513,763 29 - - - - 6,513,763 29 871,000 1,778,600 2,000,000 665,000 6,527,046 583,007 1,674,032 2,345,703 667,821 6,410,493 380,000 - 850,000 270,000 1,500,000 19 194,020 155,181 745,451 51,000 1,145,652 19 - - - 131,000 131,000 1,150,000 1,585,793 120,000 22,762 80,000 81,073 1,756,000 860,000 1,695,000 968,130 1,560,148 1,262,532 - 2,037,600 - 27,658 2,027,900 - 96,000 133,600 100,600 94,541 119,902 96,314 96 - 147,300 145,221 117,400 108,545 10,000 39,017 160,600 153,720 125,800 196,400 198,800 133,881 181,672 213,059 118,500 150,500 177,800 131,277 148,218 175,367 158 - - 968 - - 155,600 194,900 128,500 160,447 179,642 142,947 144,200 173,500 234,800 149,500 142,467 170,978 228,251 167,188 - 56,000 2,003 - - 16,582 41,421 - 208,900 134,900 192,000 188,500 213,540 135,054 165,364 200,240 13,255,300 12,627,118 9,790,300 9,777,635 1,443,372 1,421,534 3,367,970 24 3,367,453 24 210,000 209,969 2,998,603 9 2,998,603 9 1,790,922 1,789,816 7,057,043 8 7,057,043 8 1,614,583 1,609,386 4,461,073 42 4,461,073 42 1,660,498 1,656,575 6,447,164 16 6,447,164 16 2,057,297 2,054,165 6,973,220 48 6,973,220 48 1,561,898 1,545,378 1-31 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 1-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY78 FY79 FY80 FY81 September 30, 1981 50F. Westville Lake, New Work Mass. Approp. - - - - 5,684,683 47 Cost - - - 5,684,683 4 Maint. Approp. 184,800 140,600 180,500 168,300 1,628,796 Cost 138,283 189,032 179,818 165,378 1,625,135 1. Includes $1,465,123 for previous projects. Includes $935,303 emergency relief funds and $1,030,806 public works funds. 2. Includes $17,879 for previous projects. Excludes $17,767 contributed funds. 3. Includes $509,411 for previous projects. 4. Includes $6,138,157 from pubic works funds and $4,849,740 from emergency relief funds. Excludes $115,432 contributed funds. 5. Includes $389,929 Code 711 funds and $412,988 Code 713 funds. 6. Includes $262,724 Code 711 funds. 7. Includes $3,695 Code 711 funds and $115,138 Code 713 funds. 8. Includes $208,100 Code 711 funds. 9. Includes $71,943 Code 711 funds. 10. Includes $287,374 for previous projects. Excludes $130,410 contributed funds. 11. Excludes $9,000 for subproject "Eightmile River, Conn." 12. Includes $366,348 for previous projects. 13. Excludes $12,500 expended from contributed funds. 14. Inlcudes $330,204 for previous project. 15. Includes $81,410 for previous project. 16. Includes $68,717 Code 711 funds. 17. Includes $130,393 for previous projects. Excludes $99,707 contributed funds expended. 18. Excludes $193,761 contributed funds. 19. Excludes $22,517 expended to date for land condemnations. 20. Includes $11,350 for previous project. Excludes $32,000 contributed funds expended. 21. Excludes $73,800 for previous project. Excludes $142,965 contributed funds expended. 22. Includes $331,626 for previous projects. Includes $290,877 National Industrial Recovery Funds and $59,207 public works funds. 23. Includes $32,570 for previous projects. 24. Cash for construction only. Excludes $199,410 expended to date for land condemnations. 25. Includes $59,536 Code 711 funds; 26. Includes $66,120 for previous projects. 27. Excludes $1,370,000 Public Works Administration funds expended on Fitchburg, Mass. 28. Includes $692,435 for previous projects. 29. Cash for contruction only. Excludes $164,020 expended to date for land condemnation. 30. Recreational Cost Sharing. 31. Includes $162,517 for previous project. Excludes $34,500 contributed funds expended. 32. Includes $143,538 Code 711 funds. 33. Includes $143,997 Code 711 funds. 34. Includes $179,728 Code 711 funds. 35. Includes $4,671 Code 711 funds. 36. Includes $6,432 Code 711 funds. 37. Includes $2,881 Code 711 funds. 38. Includes $378,450 for previous project. Excludes $147,887 expended from contributed funds. 39. Includes $18,310 Code 711 funds. 40. Includes $11,949 for maintenance of previous project. 41. Includes $618,469 Code 711 funds and $32,000 Code 713 funds. 42. Includes $6,255 Code 711 funds and $40,158 Code 713 funds. 43. Includes $164,688 Code 711 funds. 44. Includes $199,304 Code 711 funds. 45. Includes $139,997 Code 711 funds. 46. Includes $466,049 Code 711 funds. 47. Includes $67,667 Code 711 funds. 48. Includes $287,420 Code 711 funds. 49. Includes $245,168 Code 711 funds. 50. Includes $228,236 Code 711 funds. 51. Includes $84,462 Code 711 fAnds. 52. Excludes $187,500 contributed funds expended. 53. Excludes $11,380 contributed funds expended. 54. Includes $7,889 for previous project 55. Includes $83,276 for maintenance of previous project. 56. Includes $21,000 for previous projects and excludes $25,000 contributed funds. 57. Excludes $25,000 contributed funds expended. 58. Excludes $88,914 expended from contributed funds. 59. Excludes $21,928 expended from contributed funds. 1-32 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents July 14, 1960 as amended in 1965 July 3, 1958 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 27, 1965 March 2, 1825 June 14, 1880 Aug. 5, 1886 Sept. 19, 1890 July 25, 1892 July 13, 1892 June 3, 1896 Mar. 3, 1899 June 13, 1902 July 25, 1912 Aug. 8, 1917 Aug. 30, 19352 Do. August 26, 1937 Oct. 17, 1940 Sept. 7, 1940 Mar. 2, 19453 July 24, 1946 July 3, 1958 Oct. 23, 1962 August 13, 1968 Mar. 2, 1945 Aug. 2, 1882 ANDREWS RIVER, MASS. (see Section 1 of Text). Channel 6 feet deep, 75 feet wide from deep water in Nantucket Sound to public marina; 2 jetties; 3-acre maneuvering and anchorage basin. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (See Section 2 of Text). Control and progressive eradication of obnoxious Aquatic Plant growths from the navigable waters and streams in the U.S. Research and planning costs to be borne by U.S. Provided for continued research. BOSTON HARBOR, MASS. (See Section 3 of Text). Preservation of islands by seawalls. Weir River (Nantucket Beach Channel) 91/2ft . deep, 100 ft. wide to Steamboat Wharf at Nantasket. Fort Point Channel.6 Weir River (Nantasket Beach Channel) 9Y% ft. deep, 150 ft. wide to Steamboat Wharf at Nantasket. Weir River (Nantasket Beach Channel) from mouth of Weir River to Steamboat Wharf at Nantasket Beach 12 ft. deep, 150 ft. wide. Channel 15 feet deep from Long Island to Nixes Mate Shoal (Nixes Mate of Nubble Channel). Channel 27 feet from Nantasket Roads to President Roads. Dredge Chelsea River channel to 18 feet. For 30-foot channel from sea to President Roads through Broad Sound by less direct route than 35 and 40 foot channels. For 35-foot channel from sea to Boston Naval Shipyard, Chelsea and Charles River Bridges. Elimination from project of removal of Finns Ledge at outer entrance. Dredge Chelsea River channel 25 feet. Depth of 40 feet (45 feet in rock) in Broad Sound Channel. Present project dimensions of channel from President Roads to Commonwealth pier No. 1, East Boston and anchorage area north side of President Roads. Present project dimensions of that part of approach channel to U.S. Navy drydock No. 3, at South Boston between Main Ship Channel and U.S. harbor line. Chelsea River, channel, 30 feet deep. Reserved channel 30 feet deep. Abandons seaplane channel authorized in 1940 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 262 76th Cong., 1st sess.) Extension of 40-foot channel. Extension of President Roads anchorage. Reserved channel 35 feet deep, 430 feet wide, extending 1 mile from 40-foot main channel to L St. Chelsea River Channel and Maneuvering Basin 35 feet deep. BRISTOL HARBOR, BRISTOL, R.I. (See Section 5 of Text). Construction of a rubblestone breakwater 1,600 feet long. CHATHAM (STAGE) HARBOR, MASS. (See Section 7 of Text). Entrance Channel 10 feet deep, 150 feet wide from Chatham Roads into upper harbor. CLINTON HARBOR, CONN. (See Section 8 of Text). Maintenance of a stone dike closing a breach in sandy peninsula which separates river from outer harbor. Section 107, P.L. 86-645, Authorized by Chief of Engineers, May 2, 1966. H. Doc. 37, 85th Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 87-874, 87th Cong. H. Doc. 251, 89th Cong. Annual Report, 1881, p. 518 H. Ex. Doc. 206, 48th Cong., 2d sess. Annual Report, 1885, p. 543. Annual Report, 1890, p. 503. Annual Report, 1893, p. 769. Annual Report, 1887, p. 517. Annual Report, 1893, p. 766. H. Ex. Doc. No. 162, 53d Cong., 3d sess., Annual Report 1895, p. 648. H. Doc. 133, 55th Cong., 2d sess. Annual Report, 1898, p. 886. H. Doc. 119, 56th Cong., 2d sess. Annual Report, 1901, p. 1096. Authorized by Chief of Engineers Mar. 11, 1913. H. Doc. 272, 62d Cong., 2d sess.1 H. Doc. 931, 63d Cong., 2d sess.' H. Doc. 244, 72d Cong., 1 sess.' Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 29., 74th Cong., 1st sess.' Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 24, 74th Cong., 1st sess.' H. Doc. 225, 76th Cong., 1st sess.' Public Law 420, 78th Cong. H. Doc. 733 Cong., 2d sess.' H. Doc. 244, 80th Cong., 1st sess.' H. Doc. 349, 84th Cong.1 H. Doc. 350, 87th Cong., 2d sess.' H. Doc. 174, 90th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 456, 77th Cong., 1st sess. Annual Report 1942. S. Ex. Doc. 84, 47th Cong., 1st sess. 1-33 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 1-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 2, 1945 June 10, 1872 Mar. 3, 1881 June 25, 1910 Feb. 27, 1911 Mar. 2, 1919 Aug. 30, 1935 May 24, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 May 17, 19505 July 14, 1960 (Sec. 107) Aug. 30, 1935 July 14, 1960 July 14, 1960 July 14, 1960 as amended in 1965 Mar. 2, 1945 July 14, 1960 as amended in 1965 July 14, 1960 Oct. 27, 1965 June 13, 1902 Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 4, 1913 Oct. 17, 1940 8-foot channel and anchorage. CONNECTICUT RIVER BELOW HARTFORD, CONN. (See Section 9 of Text). Jetties at the mouth. The Hartford dike. Channel and turning basin in Eight-mile River. Present project dimensions of channel over Saybrook bar. Dikes, training walls, and revetments. Present project dimensions of channel and additional dikes, training walls, revetments, and accessory works. Park River declared nonnavigable. Channel and anchorages, North Cove, Old Saybrook. Channel, anchorage, and turning basin, Eight-mile River. Channel and anchorage in Essex Cove. Channel and anchorage in Wethersfield Cove. COREA HARBOR, GOULDSBORO, ME. (See Section 10 of Text). Anchorage basin 8 feet deep, 600 feet long and 400 feet wide. Construction of an access channel 8 feet deep and 100 feet wide, extending from deep water to existing anchorage basin, a distance of approximately 2,000 feet. In addition the existing 5.5 acre anchorage would be expanded 3 acres. FORE RIVER, BRAINTREE AND WEYMOUTH, MASS. (See Section 12 of Text). A channel 6 feet deep with a width from 60 to 100 feet. It would begin at the Federal ship channel in Quincy and extend 8,000 feet upstream to the Quincy Ave. Bridge. GREEN HARBOR, MASS (See Section 14 of Text). Channel 6 feet deep, 100 feet wide from deep water to head of navigation; anchorage near town pier; sealing, rebuilding in part and extension of existing west jetty. GUILFORD HARBOR, CONN. (See Section 15 of Text). Entrance channel 100 feet wide, 6 feet deep; a channel 60 feet wide, 6 feet deep; an anchorage basin 6 feet deep, 200 feet wide. HAMPTON HARBOR, N.H. (See Section 16 of Text). Extending north jetty 1,000 feet, raising outer 300 feet south jetty and constructing 180-foot spur to high ground, channel 8 feet deep, 150 feet wide across entrance bar. ISLAND END RIVER, CHELSEA, MASS. (See Section 17 of Text). A 100-foot wide access channel extending from Mystic River for a length of approximately 2500 feet to the site of the proposed marina facility and would allow for an overall depth of 6 feet. JONESPORT HARBOR, ME. (See Section 18 of Text). A steel sheetpile breakwater 1200 feet in length. A 15-acre anchorage composed of 9-acres; 6 feet deep and 6 acres 8 feet deep. An entrance channel 100 feet wide and 8 feet deep. KENNEBEC RIVER, ME. (See Section 19 of Text). Channel between Augusta and Gardiner, Maine. Channel below Gardiner, Maine. Channel west of Swan Island. 27-foot channel from mouth of Bath. MENEMSHA CREEK, MARTHA'S VINEYARD, MASS. (See Section 21 of Text). H. Doc. 240, 76th Cong., 1st sess. Present project dimensions approved by Chief of Engineers, Dec. 22, 1887. Present project dimensions authorized by Chief of Engineers in 1889. H. Doc. 327, 60th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 1294, 61st Cong., 3d sess. H. Doc. 132, 65th Cong., 1st sess.4 H. Doc. 49, 73d Cong., 1st sess.4 Ltr. Sec. War, Apr. 21, 1937. H. Doc. 368, 76th Cong., 1st sess.4 H. Doc. 666, 80th Cong., 2d sess.4 Chief of Engineers, Oct. 18, 1961. Chief of Engineers, Nov. 15, 1960. Rivers and Harbors Committee, Doc. 27, 74th Cong., 1st sess.1 P.L. 86-645, Sec. 107, as amended. Authorized by Chief of Engineers August 14, 1981. P.L. 86-645, Sec. 107, as amended. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, June 4, 1981. Section 107, P.L. 86-645. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Dec. 15, 1965. H. Doc. 149, 77th Cong., 1st sess. Section 107, P.L. 86-645, Chief of Engineers, February 18, 1964. P.L. 86-645, Sec. 107, as amended. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, April 6, 1981. H. Doc. 481, 94th Cong., 2d sess. H. Res. 23 Sep 76 S. Res. 1 Oct 76 H. Doc. 262, 56th Cong., 1st sess.4 H. Doc. 321, 59th Cong., 2sd sess.4 H. Doc. 746, 62nd Cong., 2nd sess.4 S. Doc. 55, 77th Cong., 1st sess.4 1-34 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 2, 1945 10-foot entrance channel; 10-foot anchorage basin; 8-foot H. Doc. 365, 76th Cong., 1st sess. June 2, 1874 June 13, 1902 August 26, 1937 July 14, 1960 June 14, 1880 June 25, 1910 Mar. 2, 1945 July 4, 1836 March 3, 1899 March 2, 1907 Sept. 4, 1954 July 14, 1960 as amended July 14, 1960 as amended in 1965 Mar. 2, 1945 October 23, 1962 Sept. 3, 1954 Oct. 27, 1965 Aug. 13, 1968 Mar. 7, 1974 June 30, 1948 channel. MILFORD HARBOR, CONN. (See Section 22 of Text). East jetty at the mouth of the river. West jetty at the mouth of the river. Entrance channel and anchorage basin east of it. Anchorage west of channel and present project dimensions of channel above Merwin's Wharf. 6-foot anchorage west of 8-foot channel. NEWBURYPORT HARBOR, MASS. (See Section 24 of Text). Construction of rubblestone jetties. Dredging the bar at entrance to harbor. Dredging channel from sea to wharves and a widened turning basin. SAKONNET HARBOR, R.I. (See Section 28 of Text). Breakwater. Prolonging old breakwater and raising it to 8 feet above mean low water, to width of 15 feet. Rock removal near breakwater. Breakwater extension and harbor dredging. A 500-foot rubble-mound breakwater and a 110-foot wide by 10-foot deep navigation channel. SESUIT HARBOR, MASS. (See Section 29 of Text). Channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide. WELLFLEET HARBOR, MASS. (See Section 30 of Text). Channel 10 feet deep, 125 feet wide and anchorage basin. OAKLAND BEACH, R.I. (See Section 35 of Text). Beach erosion control. REVERE BEACH, MASS. (See Section 36 of Text). Placement of sandfill for protection and improvement. Raising and widening of about 13,000 feet of beach by placement of sandfill. CHARLES RIVER DAM, MASS. (See Section 41 of Text). Flood control dam and navigation locks on Charles River: CHARLES RIVER (NATURAL VALLEY STORAGE AREAS) MASS. (See Section 42 of Text). Federal acquisition and perpetual protection of 17 crucial natural valley storage areas totaling 8,422 acres in what is known as the Middle and Upper watershed of the Charles River. LANCASTER, ISRAEL RIVER, N.H. (See Section 43G. of Text). Construction of a gabion overflow weir for local flood protection. H. Ex. Doc. 107, 42nd Cong., 3rd sess., and Annual Report 1873, p. 1042. Authorized by Dept., Oct. 16, 1879, Annual Report for 1879, p. 342. H. Doc. 280, 56th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 77, 75th Cong., 1st sess. P.L. 86-645, Section 107, Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Feb. 13, 1961. Annual Report 1910, p. 59. H. Doc. 703, 76th Cong., 3d sess. H. Doc. 154, 20th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 81, 55th Cong., 1st sess. and Annual Report 1897, p. 934. H. Doc. 99, 56th Cong., 2nd sess. and Annual Report 1901, p. 1148. H. Doc. 436, 82nd Cong., 2na sess. P.L. 86-645, Sec. 107, as amended, Authorized by Chief of Engineers June 25, 1981. P.L. 86-645, Sec. 107. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, February 6, 1980. Annual Report 1895, H. Doc. 557, 76th Cong., 3d sess. Section 103 of 1962 River and Harbor Act. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, April 30, 1980. H. Doc. 146, 82nd Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 211, 91st Cong., 2d sess., in accordance with Section 201 of 1965 Flood Control Act. (1970) H. Doc. 370, 90th Cong., 2d sess. Chief of Engineers report dated December 6, 1972. P.L. 80-858, Sec. 205, as amended. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, May 11, 1978. 1-35 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS1 U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 1-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents July 24, 1946 Aug. 13, 1968 July 24, 1946 June 30, 1948 July 24, 1946 July 24, 1946 July 24, 1946 Nov. 17, 196il Nov. 17, 1966 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 22, 1976 Oct. 27, 1965 July 14, 1960 1. Contains latest published maps. See also Annual Report, 1911, p. 1178 (seawalls and Nixes Mate Channel) and Annual Report, 1903, p. 770 (Fort Point Channel). 2. Authorized in part by Public Works Administration, Sept. 6, 1933. 3. A portion deferred for restudy. 4. Contains latest maps. 5. Inactive. 6. A portion has been abandoned pursuant to P.L. 624, Dec. 31, 1970. 7. Removal of one ledge inactive. 8. Quinipiac River 22-foot channel and turning basin deferred for restudy. 9. 15- and 12-foot channel and basin inactive. 1-36 CONNECTICUT RIVER, NO. STRATFORD, N.H. (See Section 43K. of Text). Emergency bank and shoreline protection. PARK RIVER, HARTFORD, CONN. (See Section 43M. of Text). Flood protection on Park River in Hartford, Conn. SALMON RIVER, COLCHESTER, CONN. (See Section 43N. of Text). Construct 250 feet of "Doublewal" precast concrete block slope protection along the right bank of the river adjacent to Brown's Mill Road. HOUSATONIC RIVER, PITTSFIELD, MASS. (See Section 44D. of Text). Supplement the existing 8-foot high by 15-foot wide stone arch culvert under the Penn Central Railroad embankment with four 10-foot diameter concrete pipe culverts. HOUSATONIC RIVER, SALISBURY, CONN. (See Section 44E. of Text). Emergency bank and shoreline protection. HOUSATONIC RIVER, SHEFFIELD, MASS. (See Section 44F. of Text). Emergency bank and shoreline protection. SQUANTZ POND, NEW FAIRFIELD, CONN. (See Section 44H. of Text). Provides for a timber bulkhead varying in height up to 4 feet above the beach surface and constructed of 4" x 6" pressure treated timbers. NORTH NASHUA RIVER, MASS. (See Section 45E. of Text). Local Flood Protection along No. Nashua River in the city of Fitchburg, Mass. PHILLIPS LAKE, MASS. (See Section 45F. of Text). Flood control, local protection project on Phillips Brook north of its confluence with the North Nashua River in Fitchburg. NEW LONDON, CONN. (See Section 47 of Text). Hurrican barriers protecting city of New London from tidal damage. DICKEY-LINCOLN SCHOOL LAKES, ME. (See Section 48A. of Text). Construction of multi-purpose project on the upper St. John River to provide for power, flood control and recreation. STAMFORD, CONN. (See Section 49. of Text). Hurricane barrier protecting areas of Stamford from tidal damage. P.L. 79-526, Sec. 14, as amended. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, November 3, 1980. S. Doc. 43, 90th Cong., 1st sess. P.L. 79-526, Sec. 14, as amended. Authorized by Chief of Engineers. September 24, 1980. P.L. 80-858, Sec. 205, as amended. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, August 1981. P.L. 79-526, Sec. 14 as amended. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, December 3, 1979. P.L. 79-526, Sec. 14 as amended. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, December 3, 1979. P.L. 79-526, Sec. 14, as amended. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, November 3, 1980. S. Doc. 113, 89th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 113, 89th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 478, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 236, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 210, 86th Cong., 1st sess. NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-C BOSTON HARBOR, MASS. Total Federal Cost for Existing Project to September 1981 (See Section 3 of Text) Funds New Work Maintenance Total Regular $21,881,851 $6,619,424 $28,501,275 Public Works 1,030,806 - 1,030,806 Emergency Relief 935,303 - 935,303 $23,847,960 $6,619,424 $30,467,384 1. Excludes $17,767 contributed funds. TABLE 1-D RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Date Survey Date Survey Project Conducted Project Conducted Connecticut Massachusetts Bridgeport Harbor Jul 1981 Annisquam River Aug 1981 Mianus Harbor Jun 1981 Boston Harbor Feb 1981 Milford Harbor Jan 1981 Canapitsit Channel Nov 1980 New Haven Harbor Jul 1981 Chatham (Stage) Harbor Oct 1981 Patchogue River Mar 1981 Chelsea River Aug 1981 Cohasset Harbor Jun 1981 Maine Cuttyhunk Harbor Nov 1980 Pig Island Gut Jul 1981 Duxbury Harbor Apr 1981 Rockland Harbor Jun 1981 Fall River Jul 1981 Royal River Jul 1981 Gloucester Harbor Aug 1981 S. Bristol Harbor Jul 1981 Hyannis Harbor Oct 1980 Tenants Harbor Aug 1981 Mystic River Aug 1981 Wood Island Harbor Jul 1981 Newburyport Harbor Jan 1981 York Harbor Dec 1980 Salem Harbor Mar 1981 Scituate Harbor Nov 1980 Rhode Island Block Island-Hbr of Refuge Jul 1981 Great Salt Pond Jul 1981 1-37 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 1-E OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1981 Full Report Contributed See Annual Operation and Funds Expended Project Report For Construction Maintenance (Construction) Apponaug Cove, R.I.' Bagaduce River, Me.3 '4 Bar Harbor, Me.' Bass Harbor, Me.6 Bass Harbor Bar, Me.' Beals Harbor, Me.' Belfast Harbor, Me.' Bellamy River, N.H. ' 3 '4 Beverly Harbor, Mass.' Boothbay Harbor, Mass.' Branford Harbor, Conn.' Bucks Harbor, Machiasport, Me."1 6 Bucksport Harbor, Me.' Bullocks Point Cove, R.I.' Bunker Harbor, Me.' Buttermilk Bay Channel, Mass.' Camden Harbor, Me.' Canapitsit Channel, Mass."4 Cape Porpoise Harbor, Me.' Carvers Harbor, Vinalhaven, Me.' Cathance River, Me." 3 Coasters Island Harbor, R.I. "4 Cobscook Bay, Me." 3'4 Cocheco River, N.H."3 ' '4 Cohasset Harbor, Mass.' Connecticut River (above Hartford), Conn.' Cotuit Harbor, Mass.1" Criehaven Harbor, Me.' Cross Rip Shoals Nantucket Sound, Mass.' Cuttyhunk Harbor, Mass.' Damariscotta River, Me." '4 Deer Island Thoroughfare, Me." 4 Dorchester Bay and Neponset River, Mass." Duck Island Harbor, Conn.' Duxbury Harbor, Mass.' East Boothbay Harbor, Me.' Eastport Harbor, Me.' Edgartown Harbor, Mass.' Essex River, Mass.' Exeter River, N.H. "'4 Falmouth Harbor, Mass.' Fivemile River Harbor, Conn.' Frenchboro Harbor, Me.' Georges River, Me.' Great Salt Pond, Block Island, R.I."5 Greenwich Bay, R.I.' Greenwich Harbor, Conn.' Harbor of Refuge, Block Island, R.I.' Harbor of Refuge, Pt. Judith, R.I.' Harraseeket River, Me." 4 Hay (West Harbor), Fisher's Island, N.Y.' Hendrick's Harbor, Me.' Hingham Harbor, Mass.' Housatonic River, Conn.2 Hyannis Harbor, Mass.' Ipswich River, Mass. Isle Au Haut Thoroughfare, Me. Isle of Shoals Harbor, Me. and N.H.' Josias River, Me.' Kingston Harbor (North Plymouth), Mass.' 1964 1912 1932 1965 1920 1959 1971 1897 1951 1953 1978 1976 1907 1979 1969 1960 1960 1899 1977 1964 1884 1911 1866 1913 1979 1932 1962 1939 1954 1978 1906 1916 1968 1953 1978 1953 1979 1978 1948 1913 1978 1969 1978 1978 1976 1893 1969 1977 1979 1896 1931 1957 1954 1979 1975 1969 1980 1977 1977 1895 $ 156,874 2 28,000 406,591 188,859 4,076 184,880 61,561 34,643 246,048 18,000 9,537 277,420 18,421 170,902 95,372 31,676 102,400 9,113 175,037 190,438 21,000 5,500 4,173 119,089 267,767 38 116,324 8,541 40,776 24,200 27,167 5,000 40,000 94,584 482,166 421,297 29 6,500 638,675 39 65,614 "s 21,759 27,454 123,763 35,490 657,345 25,788 189,037 2,000 198,758 576,856 2,714,510 4o,41 30,963 8,401 28,204 28,316 859,691 484,499 5,618 137,653 80,691 115,565 8,940 $ 20,4536 39 2,187 13,187 8,828 23,305 224,449 16,821 22,983 977,472 12,338 13,593 69,343 28,406 58,902 125,936 12,279 347,865 9,021 13,161 42,617 206,356 15,822 8,125 54,328 931,558 25 905 301,944 370,617 731,785 17,238 166,984 32,589 83,938 1 3,032 238,584 152,377 15,041 224,719 300,655 6,527 186,877 1,249,066 1,403,009 5,309 3,032 6,325 78,901 2,275,876 237,213 12 32,947 140,747 643,364 113,999 100,000 123,757 20,000 127,000 11,643 35,000 so 10,000 35,000 100,000 17,587 222,010 103,001 26,813 1-38 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-E OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (Continued) For Last Cost to September 30, 1981 Full Report Contributed See Annual Operation and Funds Expended Project Report For Construction Maintenance (Construction) Lagoon Pond, Martha's Vineyard, Mass. 1'6 Lamprey River, N.H."'4 Little Harbor, N.H. 1" 2s Little Harbor, Woods Hole, Mass.1'14 Lubec Channel, Me.' Lynn Harbor, Mass. 19 Machias River, Me. 1 Malden River, Mass." 20 Matinicus Harbor, Me.1 Medomak River, Me.' Mianus River, Conn. Merrimack River, Mass. 1 Moosabec Bar, Me.' Mystic River, Conn.1 Mystic River, Mass. 1 Nantucket (Harbor of Refuge), Mass. 5 Narraguagus River, Me.' New Bedford and Fairhaven Harbors, Mass. 5 New Harbor, Me.' New Haven Breakwater, Conn.1 New London Harbor, Conn. Newport Harbor, R.I.' Niantic Bay and Harbor, Conn.1 Northeast Harbor, Me. 1 Owl's Head Harbor, Me.13 Patchogue River, Conn.' Pawcatuck River, R.I. & Conn.' Pawtuxet Cove, R.I.' Penobscot River, Me.' Pepperell Cove, Me.5 Pig Island Gut, Me.' 6 Pleasant Bay, Mass. Pleasant River, Me.1 Plymouth Harbor, Mass. 1 Pollock Rip Shoals, Nantucket Sound, Mass. 1 Potowomut River, R.I.' Providence River & Harbor, R.I.5 Provincetown Harbor, Mass. 1 Red Brook Harbor, Bourne, Mass.9 Richmond Harbor, Me. 1'4 Richmond's Island Harbor, Me. 1'" Rockland Harbor, Me.11 Rockport Harbor, Mass.' Rockport Harbor, Me. 1'3 Royal River, Me.1 Rye Harbor, N.H.1 St. Croix River, Me.' Saco River, Me.' Sakonnet River, R.I.' 10� Salem Harbor, Mass. 5 Sandy Bay (Harbor of Refuge), Cape Ann, Mass."1 Sasanoa River, Me.'"3'4 Scarboro River, Me.1 Scituate Harbor, Mass.' Searsport Harbor, Me.' Seekonk River, R.I.1 South Bristol Harbor, Me.1 Southport Harbor, Conn.' Southwest Harbor, Me.' Stamford Harbor, Conn. 1976 $ 99,098 $ 6,587 80,990 1913 1977 1906 1956 1956 1972 1922 1962 1953 1978 1940 1930 1957 1967 1965 1969 1953 1966 1950 1980 1953 1972 1954 1968 1977 1978 1975 1969 1969 1966 1971 1892 1978 1956 1882 1976 1979 1972 1883 1882 1976 1979 1915 1977 1965 1950 1979 1909 1969 1922 1915 1976 1971 1966 1954 1971 1962 1962 1980 19,980 133,227 18,000 380,322 755,576 32,000 104,853 14,000 21 17,000 132,435 369,891 11,400 197,582 3,222,777 502,661 23 821,144 1,857,618 118,620 24 1,242,246 638,774 36 733,524 66,464 138,942 124,158 150,000 318,787 31 295,356 501,020 171,351 191,753 3,500 2,127,218 32,33 1,083,504 5,000 25,417,022 28 3,548,954 42 38,764 20,000 119,844 1,948,462 22,000 32,000 336,704 130,342 179,550 663,739 38,427 1,693,202 1,925,553 35,000 392,635 379,851 572,568 16 672,214 89,593 96,927 7 180,042 892,824 37 33,563 257,685 5,224 28,941 178,866 166,864 45,097 8,989 92,359 160,043 158,224 25,227 104,932 846,871 431,854 33,965 708,967 21,705 40,273 278,034 94,768 32,971 17,334 13,867 519,430 574,861 140,015 603,055 18,958 21,790 217 846, 129 846,590 50 3,751,497 298,636 1,808 452,760 194,963 255,116 29,368 36,392 1,455,341 1,559 349,443 16,060 124 1,237,333 90,243 78,271 793,234 11,052 214,175 15,971 1,672,518 4S 62,000 46,500 14,000 20,385 7,015 67,500 4,383 100,000 20,000 295,356 541,611 760,000 255,000 49,562 27 61,338 17 19,892 78,498 10,000 69,976 67,792 2,663 18,525 7,501 169,636 1-39 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 1-E OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (Continued) For Last Cost to September 30, 1981 Full Report Contributed See Annual Operation and Funds Expended Project Report For Construction Maintenance (Construction) Stockton Harbor, Me." 3,4 1915 33,000 23,216 Stonington Harbor, Conn.' 1959 377,328 103,513 Stony Creek, Branford, Conn. ' 1978 112,487 235,929 Sullivan Falls Harbor, Me.' 1914 19,871 - Taunton River, Mass.S 1948 442,895 32,917 Tenants Harbor, Me.' 1920 18,750 12,678 Thames River, Conn.5 1967 1,471,919 1,422,580 Union River, Me.3 '15 1912 146,855 113,939 Vineyard Haven, Mass.' 1943 27,186 8,699 Wareham Harbor, Mass.5 1896 95,997 10,296 Warren River, R.I.' 1890 5,000 - Warwick Cove, R.I."'6 1975 155,430 36,594 107,220 Wells Harbor, Me. 1979 360,973 1,496,032 212,000 Westcott Cove, Conn.' 1978 55,960 190,131 21,000 Westport Harbor and Saugatuck River, Conn.' 1972 19,308 180,824 Westport River, Mass.4 '9 1942 - - Weymouth Back River, Mass.' 1944 48,740 7,184 20,000 Weymouth-Fore & Town Rivs., Boston Hbr., Mass. 1979 29,875,453 43 1,201,386 440,237 Wickford Harbor, R.I.," 22 1973 233.410 70,435 49,094 Wilson Point Harbor, Conn."4 1895 $ 54,177 - Winnipesaukee Lake, N.H.' 1952 7,500 $ 29,870 Winter Harbor, Me."' 1976 162,937 - Winthrop Harbor, Mass.' 1895 8,992 38,515 Wood Island Harbor, Me. and Pod at Biddeford' 1957 135,612 12,451 12,000 Woods Hole Channel, Mass.' 1940 230,000 51,718 York Harbor, Me. 1977 239,654 346,566 32,161 1. Completed. 23. Excludes $211,649 expended for rehabilitation; jetty re- 2. Excludes costs of $137,583 for local cooperation require- paired in 1963. ments, which includes $104,583 cash contribution. 24. All assurances of local cooperation have not been fulfilled. 3. Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th Con- Public landing at Back Cove has not been constructed. Portion of gress, 1st session. project authorized by Chief of Engineers (Public Law 86-645, Sec. 4. No commerce reported. 107). 5. Completed except for inactive portion. 25. Excludes $50,000 contributed funds expended for main- 6. Authorized by the Chief of Engineers (Public Law 86-645, tenance. Sec. 107). 26. H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st sess. recommended eliminat- 7. Includes $37,714 emergency relief funds. Excludes $18,525 ing maintenance dredging. contributed funds, of which $1,785 was for work outside approved 27. Excludes $49,562 contributed funds "other" expended. project. 28. Final fund adjustment made FY1978 ($52,323.28). 8. Inactive. 29. Includes $37,000 for new work for previous project. 9. Awaiting local cooperation. Improvement to be restudied. 30. Excludes local requirements of $65,000 consisting of 10. Commerce included under Tiverton Harbor, R.I. $13,000 for public wharf and $52,000 for additional construction 11. Authorized work remaining on project is comprised of an costs. incomplete land an inactive portion. 31. Includes $133,357 for previous project. 12. Excludes $129,757 expended for rehabilitation; break- 32. Includes $188,647 for previous project. waters repaired in 1961. 33. Excludes $894,475 major rehabilitation for Long Beach 13. Recommendation for abandonment of existing project made Dike. in H. Doc. 467, 69th Congress, 1st session. Portion of project 34. Includes $2,013 for previous projects. In addition $400 was authorized by the Chief of Engineers (P.L. 86-645, Sec. 107) is expended for maintenance of contributed funds. complete. 35. Includes $15,614 for new work for previous projects. 14. Excludes $5,000 contributed funds expended. 36. Includes $40,800 for previous project. 15. Improvement adequate for commnerce. 37. Includes $135,143 for previous project. 16. Costs to local interests for berth improvements are esti- 38. Includes $10,000 for previous project. mated to be $60,000. 39. Excludes $141,530 expended contributed funds "other". 17. Excludes $81,548 contributed funds "other" expended. 40. Excludes $1,926,000 expended for major rehabilitation. 18. Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 411, 64th Con- 41. Includes $12,000 for previous project. gress, 1st session, and in River and Harbor Committee Doc. 3, 42. Includes $215,801 for previous project. 65th Congress, 1st session. 43. Includes for.previous projects $735,900 (Weymouth, Fore 19. Improvement to be restudied. R.) and $25,000 (Town R.). 20. Under State maintenance. 44. Includes for previous project $5,250 (Weymouth, Fore 21. Excludes $114,327 expended for rehabilitation; breakwater River) and $12,577 (Weymouth Town River). repaired in 1982. 45. Includes $59,420 for previous project. 22. Portion of project authorized by Chief of Engineers. 1-40 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-F NAVIGATION ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 107, PUBLIC LAW 86-645 (PREAUTHORIZATION) Fiscal Year Study Identification Costs Buttermilk Bay, Mass. (DPR) Clinton Hbr., Conn. (Recon. Rpt.) Columbia Point, Boston, Mass. (Recon. Rpt.) Canary Cove, Deer Isle, Me. (Recon. Rpt.) Corea Hbr. Gouldsboro, Me. (See Section 10. of Text) (DPR) Crane & Porter R., Danvers, Mass. (Recon. Rpt.) East Side Cove, Deer Isle, Me. (Recon. Rpt.) Eel Pond, Falmouth, Mass. (DPR) Fore R., Braintree, Weymouth, Mass. (See Section 12. of Text) (DPR) Island End R., Chelsea, Mass. (See Section 17. of Text) (DPR & P&S) Kennebunk R., Kennebunkport, Me. (DPR) Kittery Hbr., Me. (Recon. Rpt.) Nantasket Pier, Hull, Mass. (Recon. Rpt.) Oak Bluffs Harbor, Mass. (Recon. Rpt.) Patchogue R., Conn. (DPR) Pines R., Revere, Mass. (Recon. Rpt.) Provincetown Hbr. Mass. (DPR) Rockport and Old Harbors, Mass. (DPR) Saco River, Me. (DPR) Sakonnet Harbor, R.I. (See Section 28. of Text) (DPR & P&S) Saugus River, Mass. (Recon. Rpt.) Sesuit Harbor, Mass. (See Section 29. of Text) (P&S) Smith Cove, Waterford, Conn. (Recon. Rpt.) Stonington Harbor, Me. (DPR) West River, Guilford, Conn. (Recon. Rpt.) 3,302 110 4,000 2,450 34,076 5,000 4,100 78,634 35,352 34,927 61,556 5,000 4,700 84 41,428 3,866 71,718 144,851 38,348 33,656 4,280 11,903 5,000 71,429 5,000 TABLE 1-G OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Full Report Cost to Amount See Annual Sept. 30, 1981 Expended by Project Report For Construction Local Interest Burial Hill Beach, Westport, Conn.' 1958 $ 5,810 $ 11,612 Calf Pasture Beach Park, Norwalk, Conn.' 1964 56,286 120,179 Clark Point, New Bedford, Mass. 1963 -- Cliff Walk, Newport, R.I.8 1973 290,491 955,237 Compo Beach, Wetport, Conn.' 1962 84,544 169,089 Cove Island, Stamford, Conn.' 1961 47,131 94,262 Cummings Park, Stamford, Conn.' 1963 26,886 53,771 Guilford Point Beach (Jacobs Beach), Guilford, Conn.' 1961 15,620 31,241 Gulf Beach, Milford, Conn.' 1958 21,303 42,606 Hammonasset Beach, Madison, Conn.' 1956 163,183 326,366 Hampton Beach, Hampton, N.H.' 1966 260,868 385,641 Jennings Beach, Fairfield, Conn.' 1956 14,401 28,802 Lighthouse Point Park (Area 9), Conn.' 1961 3,930 7,859 Lynn-Nahant Beach, Mass. - - Matunuck Beach, South Kingston, R.I.2 1961 - Middle Beach, Conn.' 1958 8,810 17,620 Misquamicut Beach, Westerly, R.I.3 1963 14,512 29,024 Nantasket Beach, Mass.4 1971 - - North Hampton Beach, North Hampton, N.H.4 1963 -- North Scituate Beach, Scituate, Mass.' 1969 106,552 106,552 Oak Bluffs Town Beach, Martha's Vineyard, Mass.' 1976 273,334 198,583 Plum Island, Mass. 2 1977 118,882 104,875 Prospect Beach, West Haven, Conn. 2 1958 104,573 240,819 Quincy Shore Beach, Quincy, Mass.' 1962 621,440 1,242,880 Sand Hill Cove Beach, R.I.' 1959 40,143 82,000 Sasco Hill Beach, Fairfield, Conn.' 1961 23,759 47,518 Seaside Park, Conn.' 1958 150,000 329,921 1-41 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 1-G (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Full Report Cost to Amount See Annual Sept. 30, 1981 Expended by Project Report For Construction Local Interest Sherwood Island State Park, Conn.' 1959 186,80 372,802 Short Beach, Conn.' - Silver Beach to Cedar Beach, Conn. 1964 62,560 270,695 Southport Beach, Conn.' 1960 17,631 35,263 Town Beach, Plymouth, Mass. 1964 5,490 10,981 Town Neck Beach, Sandwich, Mass. 1961 - - Wallis Sands State Beach, Rye, N.H.' 1966 65,131 435,942 Wessagusset Beach, Weymouth, Mass. ' 1971 180,944 200,208 Winthrop Beach, Mass. 1960 176,567 1 353,134 Woodmont Shore, Milford, Conn.' 1961 53,838 111,679 7 1. Completed. 2. Projects is to be included in Point Judith water resources development plan authorized by 1962 River and Harbor Act. 3. Additional Federal participation will be required based on Public Law 87-874. 4. Project inactive. 5. Project is completed at no cost to Federal Government by using fill from federal navigation improvement at Housatonic River. 6. Project is 79% complete. In addition to uncompleted work, there are three additional groins, construction of which is deferred until it is determined that they are necessary. 7. Excludes $118,215 expended for work beyond scope of project. 8. Completed except for inactive portion. TABLE 1-H BEACH EROSION ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 103, PUBLIC LAW 87-874 (PREAUTHORIZATION) Fiscal Year Study Identification Costs City Park Beach, Warwick, R.I. (DPR) $ 34,943 Conimicut Point Beach, Warwick, R.I. (Recon. Rpt.) 5,000 Corn Hill Beach, Truro, Mass. (DPR) 51,918 Oakland Beach, Warwick, R.I. (See Section 35. of Text) (Const.) 416,515 Sherwood Island State Park, Conn. (DPR) 139,192 Willard Beach, Me. (DPR) 81,236 TABLE 1-I BLACKSTONE RIVER BASIN, MASS. AND R.I. (See Section 40 of Text) RESERVOIR Miles Above Estimated Federal Cost Mouth of Black- Reservoir Lands stone Height Capacity and Name Nearest City River (feet) Type (acre-feet) Construction Damages' Total West Hill2 Worcester, Mass. 25.8 51 Earthfill 12,400 $1,367,000 $94,000 $2,307,000 1. Includes highway, railroad, and utility relocations. 2. See individual report for details. 1-42 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-I BLACKSTONE RIVER BASIN, MASS. AND R.I. (Continued) LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECT Miles Above Estimated Costs Mouth of Black- Lands stone and Location River Type of Structure Construction Damages' Total Worcester, Mass. 48 Diversion tunnel and channel $4,923,500 $1,179,000 2 $6,102,500 Woonsocket, R.I. 15 Channel improvement 3,740,100 1,069,000 3 4,809,100 Lower Woonsocket, R.I. 13 Floodwall, conduits and channel 8,356,239 435,000 8,791,239 improvement 1. Includes relocations. 2. $158,000 Federal; $1,021,000 non-Federal. 3. $300,000 Federal; $769,000 non-Federal. TABLE 1-J CONNECTICUT RIVER BASIN, VT., N.H., MASS. AND CONN. (See Section 43 of Text) DAMS AND RESERVOIRS Miles Estimated Federal Cost Above Mouth of Reservoir Lands Nearest Connecticut Height Capacity and Name City River (feet) Type (acre-feet) Construction Damages' Total Vermont: Union Village2 North Hartland' North Springfield Ball Mountain 2 Townshend2 New Hampshire: Surry Mountain 2 Otter Brook2 White River Junction White River Junction Springfield Brattleboro Brattleboro Keene Keene 228.4 170 Earthfill 38,000 $ 3,186,860 $ 908,300 $ 4,095,160 211.7 191.3 120 178.2 265 168.3 133 185 Earthfill Earthfill Rockfillearth Earthfill 174.4 86 Earthfill 171.2 133 Earthfill 71,400 6,349,500 963,000 7,312,500 50,600 4,782,000 2,050,000 6,832,000 54,600 10,448,000 350,000 10,798,000 33,200 5,530,000 1,878,000 7,400,000 32,500 2,445,000 385,000 2,830,000 18,300 2,782,100 1,378,400 4,160,500 1-43 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 1-J CONNECTICUT RIVER BASIN, VT., N.H., MASS. AND CONN. (Continued) (See Section 43 of Text) DAMS AND RESERVOIRS Miles Estimated Federal Cost Above Mouth of Reservoir Lands Nearest Connecticut Height Capacity and Name City River (feet) Type (acre-feet) Construction Damages Total Massachusetts: Birch Hill2 Gardner 153.3 56 Earthfill 49,900 $ 1,775,500 $3,075,000 $ 4,850,500 Tully2 Athol 148.7 62 Earthfill 22,000 1,339,000 368,000 1,707,000 Barre Falls2 Worcester 130.2 62 Rockfill- 24,000 1,928,800 39,000 1,967,800 earth Knightville 2 Northampton 102.8 160 Earthfill 49,000 2,594,440 821,200 3,415,640 Littleville' Northampton 102.0 150 Earthfill 32,400 5,863,400 1,150,000 7,013,400 Conant Brook2 Springfield 122.0 85 Rockfill- 3,740 1,936,000 1,015,000 2,951,000 earth Connecticut: Colebrook River2 Winsted 116.0 223 Rockfill 98,500 $ 8,342,000 $5,922,000 $14,264,000 earth Mad River Winsted 120.0 178 Earthfill 9,700 3,380,000 2,210,0004 5,590,000 Sucker Brook Winsted 118.5 68 Earthfill 1,480 2,550,000 180,0003 2,730,000 1. Includes highway, railroad and utility relocation. 3. Non-Federal cost. 2. For details, see individual report. 4. Non-Federal $670,000; Federal $1,540,000 LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS Miles Above Estimated Cost Mouth of Connecticut Lands and Location River Type of Structure Construction Damages' Total Charlestown, N.H. 181 Riverbank protection $ 114,000 - $ 114,000 Chicopee, Mass. 80 Wall and levee 1,738,000 $250,000 1,988,000 Chicopee Falls, Mass.2 83 Wall and levee 2,600,000 70,000 2,670,000 East Hartford, Conn. 52 Wall and levee 2,135,000 271,000 2,406,000 Folly Brodk, Wethersfield, Conn.2 50 Channel improvement 220,300 - 220,300 Gardner, Mass. 163 Dam and levee 493,900 35,000 528,900 Hartford, Conn. 52 Wall and levee 6,930,0004 1,150,000 8,080,000 Hartford, Vt. 216 Channel improvement 332,000 - 332,000 Holyoke, Mass. 85 Wall and levee 3,418,000 150,000 3,568,000 Huntington, Mass. 100 Riverbank protection 4,000 - 4,000 Israel R., Lancaster, N.H. 2 314 Gabion overflow weir 475,000 - 475,000 Keene, N.H. 167 Channel improvement 44,000 - 44,000 Northampton, Mass. 94 Wall and levee 960,000 150,000 1,110,000 North Stratford, N.H.2 345 Slope protection 170,000 - 170,000 Park River, Conn. 2 51 Conduit 59,600,000 1,300,000 60,900,000 Riverdale, Mass. 80 Wall and levee 1,138,000 50,000 1,188,000 Salmon R., Colchester, Conn.' 38 Slope protection 235,000 - 235,000 Springdale, Mass. 84 Wall and levee 700,000 57,000 757,000 Springfield, Mass. 76 Wall and levee 932,000 272,000 1,204,000 Three Rivers, Mass. 98 Wall and levee 1,580,000 700,000 2,280,000 Ware, Mass. 110 Channel improvement 400,000 85,000 485,000 Weston, Vt. 195 Channel improvement 13,000 2,000 15,000 West Springfield, Mass. 76 Wall and levee 1,579,000 30,000 1,609,000 West Warren, Mass. 111 Wall and levee 390,000 64,000 454,000 Winsted, Conn. 115 Channel improvement 246,000 30,000 276,000 1. To be borne by local interests. Also includes local interests 3. Includes $245,000 Public Works Administration funds. portion of relocation. 4. Includes $835,000 Public Works Administration. 2. For details see individual report. 1-44 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-K HOUSATONIC RIVER BASIN, CONN. (See Section 44 of Text) DAMS AND RESERVOIRS' Miles Estimated Federal Cost Above Mouth of Reservoir Lands Nearest Naguatuck Height Capacity and Name City River (feet) Type (acre-feet) Construction Damages 2 Total Hall Meadow 4 Torrington, Conn. 41.0 73 Rock and 8,620 $1,852,400 $1,290,0003 $ 3,142,000 earthfill East Branch5 Torrington, Conn. 43.7 92 Earthfill 4,350 1,509,800 1,290,0003 2,799,800 Thomaston Torrington, Conn. 30.5 142 Rock and 42,000 6,382,000 7,900,000 14,282,000 earthfill Northfield Torrington, Conn. 30.6 118 Earthfill 2,432 1,856,000 975,000 2,831,000 Black Rock Waterbury, Conn. 29.0 154 Earthfill 8,700 5,223,700 2,958,600 8,182,300 Hancock Br. Waterbury, Conn. 25.0 57 Earthfill 4,030 1,595,000 2,585,000 4,180,000 Hop Brook Waterbury, Conn. 15.9 97 Earthfill 6,970 2,702,000 3,450,000 6,152,000 1. For details of projects, see individual reports. 4. For last full report, see Annual Report for 1970. 2. Includes highway, railroad, and utility relocations. 5. For last full report, see Annual Report for 1973. 3. Includes cost of lands borne by local interests. LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECT' Miles Estimated Costs Above Mouth of Lands Housatonic and Location River Type of Structure Construction Damages 2 Total Alford, Green River, 111.0 Earth dike and stone slope $ 41,400 $ - $ 41,400 Mass. protection Ansonia-Derby, Conn. 13.0 Wall, levee, channel 17,850,000 1,178,000 18,995,000 improvement and pumping station Danbury, Conn. 56.0 Walls, channel improvement 13,182,000 1,862,000 15,044,000 and bridge replacement Derby, Conn. 12.0 Walls, levees and pumping 7,583,000 647,000 8,230,000 station North Canaan, Blackberry 83.0 Snagging and clearing 73,900 - 73,900 River, Conn. project Pittsfield, Mass. 133.0 Stone arch culvert 443,000 85,000 528,000 Salisbury, Conn. 76.0 Gabionade with slope protection 100,000 - 100,000 Sheffield, Mass. 96.0 Stone slope protection 203,000 - 203,000 Squantz Pond, New 43.0 Timber bulkhead 95,000 - 95,000 Fairfield, Conn. Torrington, East Branch 51.0 Dike and channel improvement 389,200 - 389,200 Torrington, West Branch 52.0 Walls, dikes and channel 228,300 - 228,300 improvement Waterbury-Watertown 32.0 Wall, dike and channel 263,300 - 263,300 1. For details of projects, see individual reports. 2. To be borne by local interests. Includes relocations. TABLE 1-L MERRIMACK RIVER BASIN, N.H., AND MASS. (See Section 45 of Text) RESERVOIRS Miles Estimated Federal Cost Above Mouth of Reservoir Lands Nearest Merrimack Height Capacity and Name City River (feet) Type (acre-feet) Construction Damages Total Franklin Falls2 -- Franklin, N.H. 118.2 140 Earthfill 154,000 $ 6,190,500 $1,760,000 $ 7,950,500 Blackwater Concord, N.H. 118.8 75 Earthfill 46,000 847,000 553,000 1,400,000 1-45 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 1-L MERRIMACK RIVER BASIN, N.H., AND MASS. (Continued) (See Section 45 of Text) RESERVOIRS Miles Estimated Federal Cost Above Mouth of Reservoir Lands Nearest Merrimack Height Capacity and Name City River (feet) Type (acre-feet) Construction Damages' Total Hopkinton-Everett2,4 Concord, N.H. 87.3 115 Earthfill 157,300 12,715,400 8,737,000 21,452,500 Edward MacDowell2 Keene, N.H. 161.3 67 Earthfill 12,800 1,708,300 306,000 2,014,300 Monoosnoc 3 Leominster, Mass. 100.6 71 Earthfill 2,000 $ 3,430,000 $ 370,000 $ 3,800,0005 Phillips2 Fitchburg, Mass. 105.4 48 Earthfill 1,600 12,100,000 6,600,000 18,700,0006 Nookagee Fitchburg, Mass. 107.9 106 Earthfill 8,100 12,470,000 4,730,000 17,200,000 Whitmanville Fitchburg, Mass. 110.6 76 Earthfill 9,350 10,410,000 5,590,000 16,000,000 1. Includes highway, railroad, and utility relocation. 4. Substituted for Bennington and Beards Brook. Distance 2. For details, see individual report. and height are for Everett Dam. Distance and height for Hopkin- 3. Project deferred, cost not revised on current price basis. ton Dam are 118 miles and 76 feet, respectively. 5. Includes Non-Federal reimbursement. 6. Based on "large" Phillips plan which would eliminate Nookagee Lake. LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECT Miles Estimated Federal Costs Above Mouth of Lands Merrimack and Location River Type of Structure Construction Damages' Total Amesbury, Powow and 3.0 Wall and revetment $ 133,400 $ - $ 133,400 Merrimack Rivers, Mass.2'4 Nashua, N.H.2 55.0 Wall and levee 270,000 3,000 273,000' Lowell, N.H.2 39.0 Wall and levee 490,600 90,000 580,600 Monoosnoc Brook, Mass. 3 98.4 Channel improvement 310,000 90,000 400,000 North Nashua River, Mass. 2'4 100.5 Channel improvement 3,250,000 - 3,250,000 Saxonville, Mass.2 69.0 Wall, levee, channel 4,208,700 530,000 4,738,700 1. To be borne by local interests. 3. Project deferred. Cost has not been revised on current 2. Project completed. price basis. 4. For details, see individual report. 5. Excludes $15,000 expended from contributed funds. TABLE 1-M THAMES RIVER BASIN, R.I. AND MASS. (See Section 50 of Text) RESERVOIRS Miles Estimated Federal Cost Above Mouth of Reservoir Lands Nearest Thames Height Capacity and Name City River (feet) Type (acre-feet) Construction Damages' Total Hodges Village2 Webster, Mass. 74.5 55 Earthfill 13,000 $1,337,000 $3,144,000 $4,481,000 Buffumville2 Webster, Mass 74.4 66 Earthfill 12,700 2,157,600 841,000 2,998,600 East Brimfield2 Southbridge, Mass. 82.8 55 Earthfill 30,000 1,337,000 5,720,000 7,057,000 Westville2 Southbridge, Mass. 75.2 80 Earthfill 11,000 2,285,000 3,400,000 5,685,000 West Thompson2 Putnam, Conn. 59.3 70 Earthfill 25,600 5,014,300 1,965,000 6,979,300 Mansfield Hollow2 Willimantic, Conn. 40.0 70 Earthfill 52,000 4,108,000 2,340,000 6,448,000 1. Includes highway, railroad and utility relocations. 2. For details, see individual report. 1-46 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-M THAMES RIBER BASIN, CONN., R.I., AND MASS. (Continued) (See Section 50 of Text) LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS Miles Estimated Federal Costs Above Mouth of Lands Thames and Location River Type of Structure Construction Damages' Total Norwich, Conn. 15.0 Channel improvements $1,209,000 $72,000 $1,281,000 1. Borne by local interests. TABLE 1-N OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1981 Full Report See Annual Contributed Project Report For Construction Funds Alley Bay, Beals, Me.3 '4 1979 $ 190,500 $ - Alford, Green River, Mass. 3'4 1977 41,419 Amesbury, Powwow River, Mass. 3'4 1978 132,113 - Ansonia-Derby, Conn.3 1977 18,266,040 _ 21 Bound Brook, Scituate, Mass. 3"4 1974 47,300 - Canton, Mass. 3 '4 1964 180,670 5 92,891 Charlestown, N.H. 3'4 1976 113,330 - Cherryfield, Me.3'4 1963 203,000 - Chicopee, Mass.6 1954 1,433,600 7 385 Chicopee Falls, Mass.3 1978 2,183,912 411,292 22 Cocheco River, N.H.3 '4 1963 183,100 - Connecticut River, W. Stewartstown, N.H. 3'4 1976 54,703 - Danbury, Conn.3 1978 13,143,000 - 23 Derby, Conn.3 1977 7,582,642 19 East Branch Dam, Conn.3 1973 1,959,836 - East Hartford, Conn.3 1951 2,135,000 7,637 Fitchburg, Mass. (See No. Nashua River) - - Folly Brook, Wethersfield, Conn. 3'4 1979 220,284 - Fort Kent, Me.3'4 1979 1,981,124 Fox Point Barrier, R.I. 3 1976 11,112,801 3,679,500 14 Gardner, Mass. 3'4 1970 495,691 15,500 Hall Meadow Brook Dam, Conn.3 1970 2,572,357 - Hartford, Conn.3 1960 6,094,100 92,781,100 Hartford, White River, Vt.3 '4 1973 332,236 - Hayward Creek, Quincy-Braintree, Mass. 3'4 1979 2,235,470 - Holmes Bay, Whiting, Me3 1980 207,390 - Holyoke, Mass. 3 1953 3,418,000 24,447 Huntington, Mass.3'4"" 1960 3,900 - Johnson Bay, Lubec, Me.3 1980 105,082 - Keene, N.H.3'4 1955 44,100 - Lee, Housatonic River, Mass. 3 0o 1976 37,852 - Lowell, Mass.3 1945 490,600 24 - Lower Woonsocket, R.I.3 1977 6,600,681 1,266,638 20 Mad River Lake, Conn.3 1973 4,773,020 - Merriconeag Sound, Harpswell, Me." 1980 107,681 - Monoosnoc Brook, Mass. 3 1967 - - Monoosnoc Lake, Mass.'" 1967 - - Nashua, N.H.3 1950 270,000 ' 327 Nookagee Lake, Mass. 1976 563,677 - Northampton, Mass.3 1950 680,000 7 North Canaan, Blackberry River, Conn.3 4' 1977 73,865 - North Nashua River, Lancaster, Mass.' 4 1979 81,671 - Norwalk, Conn.3 '4 1952 52,150 2,800 Norwich, Conn.3 1960 1,209,000 - Old Town, Penobscot River, Me.3'4 1978 148,045 - Pawcatuck, Conn." 1966 644,311 214,106 1-47 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 1-N OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (Continued) For Last Cost to September 30, 1981 Full Report See Annual Contributed Project Report For Construction Funds Prestile Stream, Blaine, Me.3 1980 $ 73,674 $ - Riverdale, Mass.3 1952 1,138,000 25,000 Saxonville, Mass.3 1980 4,207,245 25 Shelburne, Androscoggin River, N.H.3 '4 1977 37,657 Smelt Brook, Weymouth-Braintree, Mass.3' 4 1978 1,803,739 Springdale, Mass.3 1952 700,000 - Springfield, Mass.3 1950 577,000 18 5,350 Stony Brook, Wilton, N.H.3 '4 1973 19,500 - Sucker Brook Dam, Conn.3 1976 2,227,712 58,800 Three Rivers, Mass.3 1970 1,577,189 12 Torrington, East Branch, Conn.3 '4 1963 389,200 - Torrington, West Branch, Conn. 3'4 1963 228,300 - Trumbull Lake, Conn. 1973 1,463,799 - Ware, Mass.3 '4 1963 400,000 - Waterbury-Watertown, Conn.3'4 1963 263,300 Westerly, R.I. 1966 - Weston, Vt. 3'4 1957 13,000 1,800 West Springfield, Mass.3 1954 1,334,000 16 West Warren, Mass.3'4 1964 389,200 41,000 Whitmanville Lake, Mass. 1979 605,023 - Williamsville Reservoir, Vt. 3'" 4 1949 146,500 - Winsted, Conn.3 1954 245,500 - Woonsocket, R.I.3 1962 4,040,000 224,500 Worcester Diversion, Mass.3 1978 5,086,859 79,300 1. Inactive. 14. Cash for construction only. Excludes $245,000 expended 2. Hopkinton-Everett substituted for Beards Brook and for land condemnation. Bennington. 15. The Island, Townshend, and Ball Mountain Lakes were 3. Completed. substituted. 4. Authorized by Chief of Engineers. 16. Excludes $245,000 Public Works Administration funds. 5. Reflects FY 1967 settlement of outstanding claims. 17. Excludes $280,000 Public Works Administration funds. 6. Completed except for inactive portion. 18. Excludes $355,000 Public Works Administration funds. 7. Includes $295,000 Public Works Administration funds. 19. Excludes $346,653 Contributed Funds, Other. 8. Excludes $147,366 flood control and coastal emergency 20. Excludes $488,920 Contributed Funds, Other. funds expended. 21. Excludes $727,460 Contributed Funds, Other. 9. Excludes $835,000 Public Works Administration funds. 22. Excludes $12,000 expended for land condemnations and 10. Emergency Bank Protection. $25,184 Contributed Funds, Other for relocations. 11. A dam was constructed at site by private interests. 23. Excludes $1,147,169 expended from Contributed Funds, 12. Excludes $565,168 Contributed Funds, Other. Other. 13. To be restudied. 24. Excludes $794,374 Public Works Administration funds. 25. Excludes $8,503 Contributed Funds, Other. TABLE 1-0 FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 205, PUBLIC LAW 80-858 (PREAUTHORIZATION) Study Identification Fiscal Year Costs Ammonoosuc River, Lisbon, N.H. (Recon. Rpt.) $ 2,387 Aroostook River, Ft. Fairfield, Me. (Recon. Rpt.) 3,875 Austin & Chase Streams, Me. (Recon. Rpt.) 5,000 Beaver Brook, Ansonia, Conn. (Recon. Rpt.) 3,000 Beaver Brook, Keene, N.H. (DPR) 40,671 Blackstone River, Uxbridge, Mass. (Recon. Rpt.) 905 Housatonic River, Pittsfield, Mass. (See Section 44D of Text) (DPR) 2,534 Ipswich River, Wilmington, Mass. (Recon. Rpt.) 3,300 Israel River, Lancaster, N.H. (See Section 43G of Text) (Const.) 148,932 Kennebec River, Augusta, Me. (Recon. Rpt.) 8,000 Little River & Bladens Brook, Seymour, Conn. (Recon. Rpt.) 3,020 1-48 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-0 OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (Continued) For Last Cost to September 30, 1981 Full Report See Annual Contributed Project Report For Construction Funds Middle River, Stafford, Conn. (Recon. Rpt.) 3,200 Pawtuxet River, Warwick, R.I. (DPR) 32,498 Pocasset River, Johnston, R.I. (Recon. Rpt.) 5,000 Sebasticook River, Hartland, Me. (DPR) 25,069 St. John River, Fort Kent (Eng. Studies) 3,727 TABLE OTHER AUTHORIZED MULTIPLE-PURPOSE PROJECTS 1-P INCLUDING POWER For Last Cost to September 30, 1981 Full Report See Annual Contributed Project Report for Construction Funds Passamaquoddy Tidal Power Project, Me.' 1935 6,384,394 1. Work discontinued in 1937. Facilities transferred to War Assets Administration. 1-49 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 1-Q DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Funds Expended Full Report See Annual Date Contributed Project Report For Deauthorized Construction Funds Alternative for Sugar Hill Reservoir Andover Lake, Conn. Bagaduce River, Me. (uncompleted portion) Baker Brook, Mass. Beards Brook Reservoir, N.H. Beaver Brook Lake, N.H. Bennington Reservoir, N.H. Brant Rock Beach, Marshfield, Mass. Bridgeport Harbor, Conn. (uncompleted portion) Brockway Lake, Vt. Cambridgeport Lake, Vt. Chicopee, Mass. (uncompleted portion) Claremnot Lake, N.H. Clyde, R.I. Connecticut River below Hartford Conn. (uncompleted portion) Cotuit Harbor, Mass. Fivemile River Harbor, Conn. (uncompleted portion) Gaysville Lake, Vt. Greenwich Point Beach, Conn. Housatonic River, Conn. (uncompleted portion) Honey Hill Lake, N.H. Ludlow Lake, Vt. Manchester Harbor, Mass. Marblehead Harbor, Mass. Mattapoisett Harbor, Mass. Mountain Brook Dam, N.H. Mystic, Conn. Napatree Beach, R.I. Narragansett Pier, R.I. North Andover and Lawrence, Mass. Norwalk-Wilton, Conn. Pawcatuck River, R.I. & Conn. (uncompleted portion) Pawtucket, R.I. Point Judith, R.I. Pontiac Diversion, R.I. Provincetown Beach (Herring Cove), Mass. (uncompleted portion) Provincetown Harbor, Mass. (uncompleted portion) Saco River, Me. (uncompleted portion) Sandy Bay, Cape Ann, Mass. (uncompleted portion) South Coventry Lake, Conn. South Tunbridge Lake, Vt. Stamford Harbor, Conn. (2 projects uncompleted portions) Stonington Harbor, Me. Stratford, Conn. Sugar Hill Reservoir, N.H. The Island Lake, Vt. Thumperton Beach, Eastham, Mass. Wareham-Marion, Mass. Victory Lake, Vt. West Brookfield Reservoir, Mass. West Canaan Lake, N.H. Westfield, Mass. Westport, Conn. Westport Harbor and Saugatuck River, Conn. (uncompleted portion) - Aug 1977 - - 1972 1949 1973 1949 1961 1980 1946 1954 1968 1948 1979 1962 1969 1970 1959 1979 1949 1949 1968 1950 1949 1968 1966 1949 1973 1979 1949 1968 1948 1961 1979 1979 1922 1951 1979 1961 1973 1946 1961 1965 1967 1948 1948 1967 1965 1972 Aug 1977 Oct 1978 Nov 1979 Aug 1977 Apr 1978 Aug 1977 Nov 1979 Nov 1979 Aug 1977 Aug 1977 Aug 1977 Dec 1970 Apr 1951 Oct 1978 Oct 1978 Oct 1978 Oct 1976 Oct 1978 Nov 1979 Aug 1977 Aug 1977 Nov 1979 Oct 1978 Oct 1978 Aug 1977 Aug 1972 Nov 1979 Nov 1970 Aug 1977 Nov 1979 Nov 1979 Nov 1977 Nov 1977 Apr 1951 Oct 1978 Oct 1978 Oct 1978 Oct 1978 Aug 1977 Aug 1977 Oct 1978 Nov 1979 Mar 1977 Dec 1944 Aug 1977 Nov 1979 Aug 1977 Aug 1977 Jul 1960 Aug 1977 Sep 1969 Feb 1970 Nov 1979 94,000 78,000 378,300 205,000 242,700 8,800 8,541 206,600 92,000 23,986 43,711 57,000 67,700 115,590 20,000 198,477 24,200 96,000 2,543 934,500 81,715 168,400 67,000 92,000 507,200 29,634 1-50 NEW YORK, N.Y., DISTRICT* This district comprises western Vermont, small portions of western Massachusetts, Connecticut, and eastern and south-central New York, including Long Island, and northeastern New Jersey, embraced in the drainage basins tributary to Lake Champlain and St. Lawrence River system east thereof and to Atlantic Ocean from New York-Connecticut State line to but not including Manasquan Inlet, N.J. It exercises jurisdiction, however, over Navigation all matters pertaining to improvement of Great Lakes to Hudson River waterway. Under the direction of the Secretary of the Army, the District Engineer, as Supervisor of New York Harbor, also exercises jurisdiction under the laws enacted for the preservation of the tidal waters of New York Harbor, its adjacent or tributary water, and the waters of Long Island Sound. 1. Aquatic Plant Control ............... 2. Bronx River, N.Y.................. 3. East River,N.Y. ................... 4. East Rockaway Inlet, N.Y. .......... 5. Glen Cove Creek, N.Y............... 6. Hudson River, N.Y. ................. 7. Jamaica Bay, N.Y. ................ 8. Jones Inlet, N.Y. ................... 9. Mamaroneck Harbor, N.Y............ 10. Mattituck Harbor, N.Y.............. 11. Moriches Inlet, N.Y. ................ 12. Narrows of Lake Champlain, N.Y. .... 13. New York & New Jersey Channels ... 14. New York Harbor - collection and removal ofdrift ....................... 15. New York Harbor-entrance channels & anchorage areas .................. 16. Raritan River, N.J.................. 17. Shark River, N.J .................. 18. Shooters Island, N.Y. & N.J.......... 19. Westchester Creek, N.Y. ............ 20. Supervisor of New York Harbor...... 21. Reconnaissance and conditions surveys .............................. 22. Other authorized navigation projects . 23. Navigation work under special authorization ........................... Beach Erosion Control 24. East Rockaway Inlet to Rockaway Inlet and Jamaica Bay, N.Y. (Part I) .... 25. Fire Island Inlet to Jones Inlet, N.Y... 26. Other authorized beach erosion control projects ........................... 2-2 27. Beach erosion control work under spe- 2-2 cial authorization................ 2-2 Flood Control 2-3 28. Ardsley, N.Y. ..................... 2-3 29. Elizabeth, N.J ..................... 22--54 30. Fire Island Inlet to Montauk Point, S N.Y. ............................... 2-5 31. Liberty State Park Levee & Seawall, 2- N .J............................... 2-6 32. Passaic River Basin, N.J. & N.Y. 2-7 Phase I ................ ....... 2-7 33. Raritan Bay and Sandy Hook Bay, 2-7 N .J............................... 2-8 34. Sawmill River Elmsford-Greenburg, N.Y. ... ........................ 35. South Ellenville, N.Y................ 2-9 36. South Orange, N.J ............. 2 37. Staten Island, N.Y. ................. 2-10 38. Yonkers, N.Y................. 2-10 2-10 39. Inspection of completed flood control projects........................... 2-11 40. Other authorized flood control proj2- 11 ects ............................. 41. Flood control work under special au- 2-12 thorization ..................... 42. Emergency streambank and shoreline 2-12 protection under special authorization 43. Debris removal work under special authorization ...................... 2-12 2-1244 2-13 4465.. General Investigations Surveys..... ..................... Collection and study of basic data..... Deauthorized projects .............. *All cost and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 2-1 IMPROVEMENTS Page 2-13 2-14 2-14 2-15 2-17 2-17 2-18 2-19 2-19 2-20 2-20 2-21 2-22 2-22 2-22 2-23 2-23 2-23 2-23 2-23 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 Navigation 1. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL Location. Navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters in New York District. Existing Project. Provides for control and progressive eradication of water-hyacinth, alligator-weed, Eurasian water milfoil, and other obnoxious aquatic plant growths, from the navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters of the United States, in the combined interest of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, public health, and related purposes, including continued research for development of the most effective and economic control measures. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must provide 30 percent of the cost of the program except as modified by 1962 River and Harbor Act and agree to hold the United States free from damages. State indicated on March 17, 1970 its intention to cooperate. Operations and results during period. Preparation of General Design Memorandum for control of nuisance plants in Lake Champlain, Vermont was continued. Condition as of September 30. Reconnaissance report covering the acquatic plant problems of the North Atlantic Division area was completed in August 1967. Planning for the waterchestnut control in the Hudson-Mohawk basin was completed by the New York District, contracts for $181,562 accomplished during FY1971 through FY1976. Reconnaissance report for Lake Champlain, Vermont was completed and a General Design Memorandum has been initiated. 2. BRONX RIVER, N.Y. Location. Empties into a shallow bay in north shore of East River, 11 miles by water northeast of the Battery, New York City. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12339.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Report for 1915, page 1762, and Annual Report for 1938, page 166. Existing project. A channel 10 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide to extend from deep water in East River to the head of navigation at the dam at East 177th Street, involving the first dredging from East River at Randall Avenue to a width of 200 feet; thence to Spofford Avenue, 150 feet; thence to Watson Avenue, 125 feet; thence to railroad bridge near Westchester Avenue, 100 feet, except in southern approach to bridge, where it is to be 140 feet. Section included in project is about 2.4 miles long. Mean tidal range is 6.9 feet in the estuary; mean range of spring tides, 8.2 feet; irregular fluctuations due to wind and barometric pressure vary from 4 feet below mean low water up to 8.5 feet above mean high water. New work for completed active portion of project as described above cost $1,080,910, exclusive of amounts expended under previous projects, and exclusive of $10,000 contributed by local interests. Channel widening from Westchester Avenue to East 172d Street is considered inactive and excluded from foregoing description of existing project and cost estimate. Estimated cost of this portion (1953) is $299,000. For latest published map, see Annual Report for 1912, page 1470. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. River and Harbor Act of 1913, provides that any right-of-way that may be necessary for the execution of the project shall be furnished free of cost to the United States. Right-of-way within bulkhead lines below Westchester Avenue Bridge was accepted by Chief of Engineers June 1920, and above the Westchester Avenue Bridge October 1928. On September 10, 1940, the Chief of Engineers approved releases from damages furnished by adjoining property owners in each of river between Westchester Avenue and East 174th Street. On November 12, 1940, the Chief of Engineers approved an agreement under which city of New York would reimburse the United States for cost of a retaining wall to protect adjoining property in reach of river between Westchester Avenue and New York, New Haven and Hartford Railroad bridge in lieu of furnishing additional right-of-way. On October 28, 1940, the Secretary of War authorized the acceptance of $10,000 from the city of New York to defray the cost of retaining wall. Additional right-of-way required in the section below East 172d Street has not been furnished. City of New York indicated it does not feel justified in acquiring any additional land along the river. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 5, revised 1978, Vol. 2. Operations and results during period. Contract was awarded June 16, 1980 to restore project dimensions. Work started July 24, 1980, with dredging completed October 24, 1980 at a total cost of $819,000 for maintenance. A total of 117,419 cubic yards was removed. Condition as of September 30. Work under entire existing project is about 82 percent complete. Active portion of existing project was commenced in 1914 and completed in 1941. A channel to project dimensions was completed from deep water in East River up to the Westchester Avenue Bridge in 1926. A channel 10 feet deep and 123 to 65 feet wide from Westchester Avenue Bridge to East 174th Street was completed in 1941. Work remaining under existing project consists of widening reach between Westchester Avenue Bridge and East 172d Street. Channel between East 172d Street and the upper limit of authorized project was filled in by City of New York under a Department of the Army permit and is no longer a waterway. 3. EAST RIVER, N.Y. Location. A tidal strait about 16 miles long and 600 to 4,000 feet wide, connecting Hudson River and the Upper Bay at the Battery, New York City, with Long Island Sound at Throgs Neck, New York City, and separating Long Island from Manhattan Island and the mainland. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 12335, 12339. and 12366.) Previous projects. For details see page 210 of Annual Report for 1932. Existing project. Channels of following dimenlsions (depths refer to mean low water): From deep \water in 'pper New York Bay to Wallabout Channel, 40 feet deep ad 1,000 feet wide; from Wallabout Channel to Throgs Neck, 35 feet deep, with widths varying fr'om about 550 to 1.(,000 2-2 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT feet according to locality; east of F.D. Roosevelt Island up to English Place (43d Dr.), Long Island City, 30 feet deep and varying in width from 500 to 900 feet, with widening in approach from main channel; between South Brother and Berrian Islands, 20 feet deep and 300 feet wide, with widening in approach from main channel; from East River channel to Astoria waterfront, a flared 0.31 mile entrance channel 1,600 to 400 feet wide, a 0.64 mile channel 400 feet wide, and a turning basin 1,000 feet wide and 1,600 feet long, all 37 feet deep in rock and 35 feet in soft material (South Brother Island Channel); removal of Coenties Reef to a depth of 40 feet, also removal of following rocks and reefs lying outside of limiting lines of main channel to give access to wharves: Along Brooklyn shore, Brooklyn Bridge to Manhattan Bridge (Fulton Ferry Reef), to a depth of 25 feet; Jay Street Reef, 25 feet; Corlears Reef, 35 feet: Shell Reef, 25 feet; Horns Hook, 40 feet; Rhinelander Reef, 26 feet; and reef off Oak Point, 30 feet; and construction of a dike in Pot Cove in Hell Gate. Section included in improvement is about 17.8 miles long. Mean range of tide varies according to locality from 4 feet at North Third Street, Brooklyn, and 4.4 feet at the Battery to 4.9 feet at Hallets Point, 6.3 feet at Port Morris, and 7.1 feet at eastern entrance at Throgs Neck; mean range of spring tides 4.8, 5.3, 5.9, 7.6, and 8.5 feet, respectively; irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary according to locality from 3.8 feet below mean low water at the Battery, 2.4 feet at North Third Street, Brooklyn, and 3.8 feet at Throgs Neck up to about 5.2 feet above mean high water at the Battery and 8.4 feet above mean high water at Throgs Neck; extreme fluctuations do not seriously affect navigation. Local cooperation. Resolutions of 1970 require local interests to furnish lands, easements and rights-of-way for construction and maintenance; hold the United States free from damages; provide and maintain depths in berthing areas and local access channels serving the terminals commensurate with project depth; provide upon transfer to the United States, a depth in the existing South Brother Island Channel and turning basin of not less than 30 feet; and establish regulations prohibiting discharge of untreated sewage, garbage, and other pollutants in the waters of the harbor, which shall be in accordance with regulations of Federal, State and local authorities responsible for pollution control. Assurances of local cooperation were furnished by the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey under date of April 9, 1974. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 5, revised 1978. Vol. 2. Operations and results during period. A contract for maintenance dredging of the South Brother Island Channel was awarded November 3, 1980. Work started December 22, 1980 and was completed March 27, 1981. A total of 420,830 cubic yards was removed at a total cost of $1,511,135 for maintenance. Condition *as of September 30. Work under existing project was commenced June 1916 and was essentially completed in November 1976. Construction of dike at Pot Cove in Hell Gate and a part of widening near pierhead line in Jay Street Reef are considered unnecessary for the needs of current navigation. 4. EAST ROCKAWAY INLET, N.Y. Location. On south shore of Long Island between main body of island and western end of Long Beach. It is 10 miles east of Rockaway Inlet and about 27 miles by water south and east from the Battery, New York City. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12352.)4 Existing project. A channel 12 feet deep at mean low water and 250 feet wide from 12-foot contour in Atlantic Ocean for about 0.6 mile to 12-foot contour in Long Beach Channel protected by a jetty. Mean tidal range, 4.3 feet; mean range of spring tides, 5.2 feet; irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 3.9 feet below mean low water up to 5.6 feet above mean high water. New work for completed project cost $603,969, including $100,000 contributed funds. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 39 terminals in Oceanside, Island Park, Long Beach, and East Rockaway. Nine of these are oil terminals, one of which has a railroad spur. Other terminals are repair and mooring docks with a berthage of 7,655 feet. Of these, 21 have marine railways and 1 has mechanical-handling facilities. There are public wharves at East Rockaway and Woodmere. Waterfront on north side of Long Beach has been bulkheaded. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during period. A total of $10,600 was expended in FY 1981 for engineering and design of maintenance dredging specifications for work to be accomplished in FY 1982. Condition as of September 30. Work under existing project began February 1933 and is 100 percent complete. East jetty, 4,250 feet long, was completed in July 1934. Project channel was completed in May 1935. 5. GLEN COVE CREEK, N.Y. Location. A narrow tidal inlet extending eastwardly about 1 mile from east side of Hempstead Harbor on the north shore of Long Island, 26 miles northeast of the Battery, New York City. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12366.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 100 feet wide and 8 feet deep at mean low water from deep water in Hempstead Harbor about 1 mile to the head of navigation at city of Glen Cove. Mean tidal range, 7.4 feet; mean range of spring tides, 8.7 feet; irregular fluctuations due to wind and barometric pressure vary from 3.6 feet below mean low water up to 8.4 feet above mean high water. New work for completed project cost $29,760, exclusive of $29,774 expended from contributed funds. Widening to 100 feet the upper 1,630 feet of channel and building a sand fence along north side of channel where it crosses the beach are considered inactive and excluded from foregoing description and cost estimate. Estimated cost of this portion (1954) is $140,000, including 50 percent to be contributed by local interests. Existing project adopted by 1925 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 207, 68th Cong., 1st sess.). Latest published map is in project document. Local cooperation. River and Harbor Act of March 3, 1925, provides that local interests pay one-half of first cost 2-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 of the work, provide rights-of-way, spoil-disposal areas, and bulkheads, and give assurances that adequate terminals will be built. Complied with as to contribution of onehalf of first cost of work done to date, cession of rights-ofway, provision of disposal areas, and the construction of terminals. Pending construction of bulkheads by local interests along southerly side of channel in the upper 1,600 feet of the improvement, a channel of less than project width has been excavated. In letter dated February 4, 1948, the Commissioner, Department of Public Works, City of Glen Cove, was notified of the conditions affecting the remaining work. There is no indication as to when compliance with these conditions may be expected. Terminal facilities. There are 1,875 feet of bulkheads along northerly side of waterway. Terminals are adequate for present needs and there is ample waterfront, both public and private, for additional terminals as needs arise. Operations and results during period. The local cooperating agency was reimbursed $21,219 for partially constructing dikes at an upland disposal site. Maintenance was not performed due to environmental problems and constraints at the upland disposal site. Condition as of September 30. Entire existing project is about 55 percent complete. Work under the active portion of existing project was commenced August 1933 and completed August 1934. The work done provided a channel 100 feet wide from deep water in Hempstead Harbor for 3,470 feet, thence gradually decreasing to 50 feet wide for 180 feet, and 50 feet wide for about 1,450 feet to the head of the improvement. Head of navigation is at City of Glen Cove, about 1 mile above the mouth. Work remaining to complete existing project consists of widening to 100 feet the upper 1,630 feet of channel and building a sand fence along north side of channel where it crosses the beach. 6. HUDSON RIVER, N.Y. Location. Originates in Adirondack Mountains, about 250 miles in a direct line and 315 miles along its course from the Battery, New York City, and flows generally southerly into New York Bay. Section under improvement extends from New York City about 156 miles to Waterford. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 282, 283, 284, 747, and 748.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1915 and 1938, pages 1764 and 226, respectively. Existing project. A channel 600 feet wide from New York City to Kingston and thence 400 feet wide to Albany, with widening at bends, a turning basin 700 feet wide and 1,200 feet long at Albany, and 2 anchorages, 1 near Hudson and 1 near Stuyvesant, each 400 feet wide and an average length of 2,400 feet; all with depths of 32 feet in soft material and 34 feet in rock to 2,200 feet south of the Mall Bridge; thence 27 feet deep and 400 feet wide to 900 feet south of the Mall Bridge; thence 14 feet deep at lower low water and generally 400 feet wide to Federal lock at Troy; and thence of same depth and 200 feet wide to southern limit of State barge canal at Waterford; and removal of State dam at Troy and construction of a lock and dam about 2.50 miles below Waterford. Channel is to be formed by dredging and rock excavation, and maintained by dredging and constructing new, and raising and repairing old, longitudinal dikes, built partly under previous projects and partly by the State of New York. Mean range of pool elevation above Federal dam at Troy, in seasons of moderage rains, is about 2.2 feet, as determined in 1934. Mean tidal range is about 4.8 feet between May and October and 5.1 feet between July and September at Federal dam at Troy and about 4.8 feet between May and October and 5.0 feet between July and September at Albany, extreme range due to freshets is 33.1 and 25.9 feet, respectively normal pool level above Federal dam from Troy to Waterford is 14.33 feet above mean sea level. In tidal section of river below dam, assumed lowest low water plane from Troy to Albany is 3 feet below mean sea level. (See Table 2-C for features of lock and dam included in existing project.) New work for completed project cost $39,050,019 exclusive of amounts of expended on previous projects. Widening to form harbors at Albany and Troy, N.Y., to 12 feet deep at a cost of $552,000 (1954) and completion of 27-foot channel at Albany at a cost of $458,000 (1957) are inactive. Construction of dikes at a cost of $642,000 (1957) was placed in deferred for restudy category. All three features of work are excluded from foregoing description of existing project and cost estimate. Construction of mooring facilities has been authorized. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Complied with except that local interests must furnish suitable spoil disposal areas for future maintenance as required. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 6, revised 1979. Operations and results during period. By use of Government plant and hired labor, stumps and snags which formed a potential menace to navigation, and other obstructions, were removed from the shores and channel of the river at a cost of $187,843 for maintenance in FY 1981. Government plant and hired labor were employed intermittently through the fiscal year in performing surveys to restore horizontal and vertical controls at a cost of $140,487 for maintenance in FY 1981. Government plant and hired labor were employed intermittently through the fiscal year on repairs to Cedar Hill Dike #3, at a cost of $4,518 for maintenance in FY 1981. The lock and dam in Hudson River at Troy, N. Y. were operated and maintained. Operation of lock for 1981 navigation season was suspended December 12, 1980 and resumed April 19, 1981. Cost incurred was $629.823 for operation and maintenance in FY 1981. The State of New York was reimbursed $493.400 for dike work previously funded from contributed funds. A major rehabilitation reconnaissance report for the Troy Lock and Dam was started in FY 1981. Costs to d(ate are $21,339. The report is to be forwarded to OCE in FY 1982. Condition as of September 30. Work under existing project began in July 1910 and was substantially completed in November 1965. New lock and dam at 'Tro. removal of damat Troy and construction of 15,545 linellar fet of dikes also are complete. In reconstruction of' old likes 39,676 linear feet were raised to adopted rltest height. Channel from New York City to Albany is comp letct (o depth of 32 feet except for the 1,500 linear-foot sect io, atl the northern end of the 32-foot projct \\which has ne~ c' 2-4 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT been dredged to project depth. Additionally, the 1,300 linear feet of the 27-foot project remains undredged. Channel from Albany to Waterford is complete to a depth of 14 feet except for a small part of the widening to form a harbor at Troy. Work remaining under the project consists of completion of the 12-foot harbor at Troy and dredging the 27-foot and the remainder of the 32-foot channels at Albany which are not deemed necessary at this time; and reconstruction of dikes. Started coordination with State regarding mooring facilities. (See Table 2-D for total costs of existing project to September 30, 1981. 7. JAMAICA BAY, N.Y. Location. Inside south shore of Long Island, the entrance being about 17 miles by water south and east of the Battery, New York City. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 12350). Previous projects. For details see page 1770 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 185 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Provides for an interior channel extending from vicinity of Marine Parkway Bridge along west and north shores of the bay, 18 feet deep at mean low water and 300 feet wide to Mill Basin, with a swinging basin, 1,000 feet wide and 1,000 feet long at the point; thence 12 feet deep and 200 feet wide to Fresh Creek Basin; and interior channel extending from the same locality along south shore to Head of Bay, 15 feet deep and 200 feet wide; a channel in Mott Basin, 15 feet deep and 200 feet wide extending from the channel along south shore, 3,000 feet to junction of the two branches, thence 2,200 feet in north branch (Inwood Creek) and 3,200 feet in south branch; and an entrance channel connecting the two interior channels with deep water in Atlantic Ocean, of suitable hydraulic dimensions to maintain present tidal prism in the bay, but not less than 18 feet deep and 500 feet wide from opposite Barren Island to Rockaway Point, thence enlarging to not less than 200 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide to the sea, protected by one riprap jetty. Length of section included in project is 19.7 miles. Mean tidal range, 4.9 feet at Barren Island, and 5.1 feet at Head of Bay; mean range of spring tides, 5.9 and 6.1 feet, respectively; irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 4 feet below mean low water to 4.9 feet above mean high water. Cost for new work for completed project is $4,466,421 (July 1961), excluding amounts expended on previous projects. Local cooperation. River and Harbor Act of 1945 provides that in lieu of conditions heretofore prescribed local interests furnish suitable areas for disposal of dredged materials for new work and subsequent maintenance, and hold the United States free from damages. City of New York was notified of conditions of local cooperation in letter dated January 25, 1946. In letter dated February 7, 1946, the Mayor of City of New York advised that disposal areas are available and necessary document "holding the United States free from claim for damages" would be executed. River and Harbor Act of 1950 provides local interests furnish lands, easements, rights-of-way, and suitable areas for disposal of dredged material during construction and subsequent maintenance, hold the United States free from damages and perform all necessary alterations to existing terminals and bulkheads, and dredge adequate approaches thereto. These conditions have been fulfilled. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 5 revised 1978. Operations and results during period. A contract for maintenance dredging of the entrance channel was awarded on December 3, 1980. Work started on January 20, 1981 and was completed on June 2, 1981. A total of 159,270 cubic yards was removed at a total cost of $1,012,359 for maintenance. Condition as of September 30. Work under existing project was commenced in August 1912 and completed in June 1961. Westerly interior channel from Barren Island to Fresh Creek Basin and swinging basin at Mill Basin were completed in April 1929. Southerly interior channel and channel in Mott Basin, including its two branches were completed in June 1961. No new work dredging of entrance channel was done, since depths provided under previous project were greater than those required under existing project. East jetty was restored to project dimensions in August 1963. 8. JONES INLET, N.Y. Location. A small inlet on south shore of Long Island connecting Hempstead Bay with Atlantic Ocean, 37 miles by water southeast of the Battery, New York City. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12352). Existing project. An entrance jetty and a channel 12 feet deep and 250 feet wide, from that depth in the ocean through the inlet to Loop Causeway Bridge over Long Creek. Section included in project is about 2.1 miles long. Mean tidal range varies from 4.2 feet at ocean entrance to 3.1 feet at Loop Causeway Bridge; mean range of spring tides varies from 5 to 3.7 feet, respectively; irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 3.9 feet below mean low water up to 8.5 feet above mean high water. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Complied with except that local interests must furnish suitable spoil-disposal areas for future maintenance as required, and must maintain a channel 12 feet deep and generally 200 feet wide from Loop Causeway Bridge over Long Creek to head of navigation in Freeport Creek at Mill Road. Terminal facilities. Within area tributary to Jones Inlet there are a number of privately owned small wharves and 40 boat repair and storage yards. The latter are equipped for repair of pleasure craft and fishing vessels. In addition, there are nine public wharves open to the public free of charge, with a total dockage of 2,180 feet. Additional terminals would have to be constructed for receipt of commercial freight in any sizable quantity. Operation and results during period. Final payment on two maintenance contracts completed in FY 1980 was made in the amount of $292,184. Condition as of September 30. Work under existing project was commenced August 1953 and completed June 1959. 9. MAMARONECK HARBOR, N.Y. Location. On north shore of Long Island South, 5 miles 2-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 west of Connecticut State line, and 27 miles by water east of the Battery, New York City. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12367). Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1915, 1924, and 1938, pages 1759, 141, and 160, respectively. Existing project. A channel 10 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide from deep water in Long Island Sound to Orient Point, and thence 80 feet wide to a point about 150 feet below the Boston Post Road, including an extension to northeast 300 feet long and 80 feet wide, all with widening at bends; for 2 anchorages, 1 of 10-foot depth about 41/2 acres in extent and the second about 14 acres in area to a depth of 6 feet; and an anchorage in the West Basin 6 feet deep at mean low water with a channel of like depth and 80 feet wide connecting this anchorage with the main channel. Section included in project, 1/4 miles. Mean tidal range, 6.9 feet; mean range of spring tides, 8.3 feet; irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 3.9 feet below mean low water up to 8.5 feet above mean high water. New work for completion cost $258,996 exclusive of $151,044 and $43,023 expended from contributed funds, required and contributed funds, other, respectively, and amounts expended in previous projects. Local cooperation. Provisions under River and Harbor Acts of 1922 and 1935 complied with except local interests must provide adequate and suitable spoil-disposal areas suitably diked or bulk-headed as needed. River and Harbor Act of 1960 provides that local interests contribute in cash 50 percent of first cost of construction, to be paid in a lump sum prior to construction, final allocation of cost to be made after actual costs are determined; provide lands, rights-of-way, and suitable disposal areas for construction and future maintenance of anchorage; hold the United States free from damages; provide at all times adequate public landing facilities, open to all on equal terms, for access to the shore by users of the anchorage; and allocate an adequate portion of the anchorage to accommodate a minimum of 15 boats, and provide mooring facilities therein, specifically designated for use by transient craft on terms equal to those in portions of the anchorage designated for use by local craft. Assurances of compliance were furnished by the village of Mamaroneck and accepted by the District Engineer on April 3, 1962. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 5, revised 1978, Vol. 2. Operations and results during period. A contract for maintenance dredging was awarded March 24, 1981. Work started on April 7, 1981 and completed on May 2, 1981. 19,361 cubic yards of material was removed at a total cost of $247,308 for maintenance. Condition as of September 30. Work under existing project began in October 1924 and was completed in May 1966. Work completed consisted of providing a 10-foot main channel, branch channel and anchorage area in East Basin completed in April 1933. A 6-foot connecting channel and anchorage area in West Basin completed in July 1939. An enlargement of anchorage area in East Basin to a depth of 6 feet completed in May 1966. In June 1963 and May 1966 controlling mean low water depth was 10 feet for a width varying from 100 to 80 feet in main channel from Long Island Sound to East Basin anchorage are thence 9 feet to upper limit including branch channel; in East Basin anchorage areas, 10 feet in 10-foot anchorage area and 6 feet in 6-foot anchorage area; in West Basin, 6 feet in 6-foot anchorage area and 6 feet in connecting channel thereto. 10. MATTITUCK HARBOR, N.Y. Location. A tidal inlet on North shore of Long Island, 85 miles east of the Battery, New York City, and 24 miles southeast of New Haven Harbor, Conn., extending southward about 21/4 mile to village of Mattituck. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12358). Existing project. A channel 7 feet deep at mean low water from Long Island Sound to a 460- by 570-foot anchorage area at village of Mattituck, protected at the entrance by two parallel jetties 400 feet apart, channel widths are 100 feet at entrance 80 feet elsewhere. Total length is about 2.2 miles. Mean tidal range at entrance, 4.9 feet; at Old Mill Bridge, Waterville, 5.1 feet; mean range of spring tides at entrance, 5.8 feet; at Old Mill Bridge, 6 feet; irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 2.2 feet below mean low water up to 6.6 feet above mean high water. Local cooperation. Complied with except local interests must furnish spoil-disposal areas for maintenance. Terminal facilities. Lower portion of harbor contains four commercial and two recreational boating terminals. Commercial terminals are used for handling petroleum products, sand, gravel, building materials, fish and shellfish. Recreational terminals have mooring accommodations available for 20 boats and facilities for the sale of gasoline, oil, bait, miscellaneous supplies and for repair services. Upper portion of harbor contains facilities for recreational craft and are open to the general public. Operations and results during period. Final Payment of $1,600 was made in FY 1981 for maintenance dredging completed in FY 1980. Condition as of September 30. Project is complete. Original dredging was completed in 1914. East jetty was completed in 1906 for a 775-foot length. West jetty was completed in 1938. 11. MORICHES INLET, N.Y. Location. On the south shore of Long Island, about 80 miles by water east of the Battery, New York City. It is an opening through the narrow sandy barrier beach on the south shore of Long Island which separates the Atlantic Ocean from a series of interconnected bays. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 12352.) Existing project. Provides for a channel, 10 feet deep at mean low water and 200 feet wide extending from that depth in the Atlantic Ocean to Moriches Bay, a distance of 0.8 mile; thence a channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide to the Long Island Intracoastal Waterway, a distance of 1.1 miles; rehabilitation of the existing jetties and revetments; seaward extension of the east jetty to the 12-foot contour and seaward extension of the west jetty a distance of 400 feet; construction of a fixed by-passing facility to transfer sand from the east side of the inlet to the west side. Mean tidal range in the ocean at the inlet is 3.3 feet and in the bay at Westhampton Beach is 0.6 foot. Irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary 2-6 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT from 1.7 feet below mean low water up to 15.7 feet above mean low water at the bay. Estimate of cost for new work is $25,210,000 (October 1981); including $50,000 from Coast Guard and $5,860,000 to be contributed by local interests. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. The River and Harbor Act of July 14, 1960 provides that local interests shall, prior to construction, agree to contribute in cash 45 percent of the cost of construction by the Corps of Engineers and agree to contribute in cash 50 percent of the maintenance, operation, and replacement, or perform work of equal value when and as acceptable to the Chief Engineers; And, provided further that in connection with the improvement of the inlet, local interests, prior to construction, agree to (a) make the cash contribution either a lump sum prior to commencement of the work, or in installments prior to commencement of pertinent work items, in accordance with work schedules as required by the Chief of Engineers, the final apportionment of cost to be made after actual costs have been determined; (b) furnish, free of cost to the United States, all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and suitable spoil-disposal areas for the initial work and for subsequent maintenance when and as required; and (c) hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction and maintenance of the project; (d) provide and maintain suitable terminal facilities when and as required for the accommodation of vessels that would navigate the inlets and adjacent bays, open to all on equal terms; and (e) maintain for the duration of the economic life of the project, continued public ownership of the publicly owned shores and their administration for public use, and continued availability for public use of the privately owned shores upon which a portion of the Federal share of the cost is based. Terminal facilities. No terminals are within the area immediately adjacent to the Federal improvement. However, numerous public and private terminal facilities are available in Moriches Bay and in the connecting canals. Several yacht clubs, boatyards, and public wharves and landings, and numerous private landings are located in Moriches Bay., The yacht clubs and boatyards have equipment for servicing boats. There are boat basins open to the public. The facilities existing in the bay are considered adequate for present and probable future needs under present conditions of Moriches Inlet. There is room for expansion should future commerce warrant. Operations and results during period. Preconstruction planning resumed in October 1977. Coordination continued with Federal, State and local agencies on current problems and need for all project purposes (i.e., navigation; beach erosion control; water quality improvement). Formulated plans for a single purpose navigation project. In January 1980, a breach occurred adjacent to the eastern jetty. Emergency funds ($11.3 million) were authorized under the authority of PL 84-99 to close the breach. About 1,185,000 cubic yards of sand fill were used to effect closure of the breach by March 1981. Condition as of September 30. Construction has not been initiated. Preconstruction planning (advance engineering and design) is continuing with the view to determining the best alternative plan for providing navigation improvements in view of existing conditions. 12. NARROWS OF LAKE CHAMPLAIN, N.Y. AND VT. Location. This waterway, 37 miles long, comprises southern end of Lake Champlain and extends from Whitehall to Crown Point, N.Y. Project extends 13.5 miles from Whitehall, N.Y. at southern extremity of lake, northerly to Benson Landing, Vt. (See Lake Survey Chart 14784). Previous projects. For details, see Annual Reports for 1932, and 1963, pages 256 and 177, respectively. Existing project. A channel extending from Whitehall, N.Y., at head of Lake Champlain, to Benson Landing, 12 feet deep at low lake level and generally 150 feet wide, and installation of fender booms at Putts Rock, Putts Leap, Narrows near Dresden, Pulpit Point and Cedar Mountain. Reference plane of low lake level is 93 feet above mean sea level. Section included in project is about 13.5 miles. Usual annual variation of lake level is 5.8 feet and extreme variation varies from 0.6 foot below up to 8.8 feet above low lake level. Widening channel throughout its entire length to project width of 200 feet is inactive and excluded from foregoing description of existing project and cost estimate. Estimated cost of this portion, revised in (1954), was $1,573,000. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. In Whitehall Harbor consisting of three timber wharves, aggregating 4,200 feet in length. State of New York constructed a barge canal terminal at Whitehall, just south of terminus of canal, which has been equipped with a 5-ton hand-operated derrick and a storehouse. Facilities are considered adequate for present commerce. Operations and results during period. Government plant and hired labor were employed intermittently during the fiscal year in removal of stumps and snags, at a total cost of $7,661. Government plant and hired labor were employed in replacing deteriorated fender booms at a cost of $15,243. Supplies and equipment cost $1,496. Total costs for the project were $24,400. Condition as of September 30. Work under the existing project was commenced June 1919 and is about 47 percent complete. A channel 12 feet deep at low lake level and least a width of 150 feet has been excavated throughout the length of the improvement, except at the Elbow (Putts Leap and Putts Rock). (Fender booms opposite the Delaware and Hudson Railroad trestle have been removed as they no longer are considered necessary for navigation). The work remaining to complete the project consists of widening the channel throughout its entire length to the project width of 200 feet. 13. NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY CHANNELS Location. Extends from deep water northwest of Sandy Hook, through Lower New York Bay and Raritan Bay, to Perth Amboy, and thence through Arthur Kill, lower Newark Bay, and Kill Van Kull to deep water in Upper New York Bay. This route is approximately along boundary line between States of New York and New Jer- 2-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 sey. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 12327, 12331 and 12333.) Previous projects. For details see 1963 Annual Report, pages 184 and 185. Existing project. A channel through Lower New York Bay, Raritan Bay, Arthur Kill, lower Newark Bay, and Kill Van Kull to Upper New York Bay, depths of 37 feet in rock and 35 feet in soft material throughout, 600 feet wide across Lower New York Bay and Raritan Bay and in Arthur Kill to a point 1,000 feet north of Smith Creek, widened to 800 feet in vicinities of Seguine Point and Wards Point, respectively; thence 500 feet wide to a point 1,000 feet south of Piles Creek; thence 500 to 600 feet wide and passing north of Shooters Island and protected by a dike on its northern side to junction of channel into Newark Bay; thence 800 feet wide through Kill Van Kull to Constable Hook; thence 1,000 feet wide from a point opposite the east end of Constable Hook to a point near the intersection with the channel along New Jersey pierhead line; and thence 1,400 feet wide through Kill Van Kull to Upper New York Bay; with an anchorage 38 feet deep to accommodate five vessels south of Perth Amboy, all with suitable easing at bends and junctions. Section included in project is 30.8 miles long. In addition, construction of a dike north of Shooters Island and two secondary channels 30 feet deep and 400 feet wide, one south of Shooters Island and the other in Raritan Bay connecting with Raritan River, were completed under previous projects and maintained under existing project. A triangular area at the eastern end of the 30 foot channel south of Shooters Island was deepened to 35 feet in order to provide additional widening in the vicinity of Bergen Point and is included in the Newark Bay project. All depths refer to plane of mean low water. Mean range of tides varies between 4.7 and 5.1 feet; mean range of spring tides, 5.7 to 6.3 feet; irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 3.9 feet below mean low water up to 6.9 feet above mean high water. Anchorage at Sandy Hook, and cutoff at junction of Main Ship Channel are deferred for restudy and excluded from foregoing description and cost estimate. Estimated cost of this portion (1957) is $2,150,000. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. See page 170, 1962 Annual Report for requirements under acts of May 28 and August 30, 1935. See page 156, 1965 Annual Report for requirements under act of May 17, 1950. See page 168, 1966 Annual Report for requirements under act of October 27, 1965. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 5, revised 1978, Vol. 2. Operations and results during period. The U.S. Hopper Dredge "GOETHALS" commenced work in Kill Van Kull and Wards Point Bend on June 25, 1981 and worked until September 2, 1981. A total of 297,395 cubic yards of material was removed at a cost of $2,616,513 for maintenance. Condition as of September 30. Work under active portion of existing project began in October 1933. Work completed consists of providing authorized project depth and widths throughout entire channel from Lower New York Bay to Upper New York Bay and providing depths of 37 and 25 feet in Perth Amboy Anchorage. In addition to above mentioned work, construction of a dike north of Shooters Island, two secondary channels 30 feet deep and 400 feet wide, one south of Shooters Island, the other in Raritan Bay connecting with Raritan River were completed under previous projects. Work remaining under existing project consists of dredging cutoff at junction of Main Ship Channel to dimensions authorized by River and Harbor Acts of August 30, 1935, and May 17, 1950, dredging anchorage in vicinity of Sandy Hook. (See Table 2-D for total cost for existing project to September 30, 1981. 14. NEW YORK HARBOR COLLECTION AND REMOVAL OF DRIFT Location. Applies to Lower and Upper Bays, New York Harbor: East River, Harlem River, Hudson River Channel, N.Y., New York and New Jersey Channels, Newark Bay, N.J., and their tributaries. Existing project. Provides for collection, removal and disposal of drift, derelict vessels, deteriorated shore structures and debris along shores of New York Harbor and tributary waters, and for the repair of certain other piers, wharves and shore structures. Work authorized before Act of 1970 was restricted solely to removal of drift from waterways and was funded as a maintenance activity. Estimate of first cost of improvement under Act of 1974 is $88,200,000 (October 1981) including $29,400,000 cash contribution from local interests, plus $32,200,000 to be contributed for repair and disposal of deteriorated shore structures in use. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local cooperation conditions of the plans currently under review by the Chief of Engineers provide that local interests must furnish all lands, easemehts and rights-of-way required for the improvement; hold the United States free from damages; enact and enforce local legislation to prevent creation of sources of drift, contribute in cash one third of the first cost of the Federal work, and make necessary repairs to deteriorated structures in use so as to eliminate them as a source of drift. These conditions are subject to approval by Secretary of the Army and the President, as stipulated in Section 113 of the authorizing law, Public Law 91-611. Operations and results during period. New Work: Liberty State Park Contract IVA was completed at a cost of $2,284,639. A contract for the East River Manhattan Waterfront was awarded on September 30, 1980 at a cost of $1,393,500, and is 88 percent complete. Liberty State Park Contract IVB was awarded on July 2, 1981 and is 16 percent complete. Engineering and design for the balance of project continued. Maintenance. U.S. Debris Boats Driftmaster, Gelberman, and Hayward and auxiliary plant were assigned the work of removing and disposing of drift. Removed and disposed of 529,962 cubic feet (4,140 cords) of driftwood, ranging in size from small blocks to timbers of large dimensions, including piles and pieces of wreckage at a cost of $2,752,459 in FY 1981. Condition as of September 30. Work authorized under Pier and Harbor Acts of 1915, 1917 and 1930 is continuous maintenance for which no percentage of completion exists. For work authorized by the 1974 Water Resources Development Act, removal of drift sources has commenced at Liberty State Park, in New Jersey and on the East River in New York. Liberty State Park Contracts I,I I,II I and 2-8 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT IVA have been completed. Liberty State Park Contract IVB was awarded on July 2, 1981 for $998,574 and is approximately 16 percent complete. 15. NEW YORK HARBORENTRANCE CHANNELS AND ANCHORAGE AREAS Location. In Upper and Lower bays, New York Harbor is 330 miles southwest by water of Boston Harbor, Mass., and 165 miles northeast of entrance to Delaware Bay, N.J. The Upper Bay extends about 5.5 miles southerly from junction of Hudson and East Rivers opposite the Battery, New York City; to the Narrows. Lower Bay extends about 9 miles from the Narrows to the sea. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 12327, 12334, 12335, and 12349.) Existing project. Ambrose Channel 45 feet deep and 2,000 feet wide, extending about 10.2 miles from the sea to deep water in the Lower bay; Anchorage Channel, an extension of Ambrose Channel, with same depth and width, in the Upper bay, opposite anchorage grounds, about 5.7 miles long; a southerly entrance channel, Sandy Hook Channel (East Section) 35 feet deep and generally 800 feet wide extending 3.4 miles from 35-foot ocean contour to Bayside Channel along an alignment generally west of the South Channel; and elimination from authorized project of that portion of Bayside-Gedney Channel east of junction with new southerly entrance channel; for Bayside Channel 35 feet deep and 800 feet wide, extending about 3.7 miles from junction with new southerly entrance channel to junction with Main Ship Channel; Main Ship Channel 30 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide, extending about 5.3 miles from Bayside Channel to deep water in Lower bay; a channel along New Jersey pierhead line connecting Kill Van Kull with deep water in Anchorage Channel, south of Liberty Island anchorage, 20 feet deep for 500 feet wide with widening at bends to 800 feet and about 3 miles long; an anchorage in vicinity of Liberty (Bedloes) Island (about 160 acres in extent) 20 feet deep; and for removal of Craven Shoal to 30 feet deep; for a channel 16 feet deep, 200 feet wide, and about 2.3 miles long, extending from bell buoy 23 to Hoffman and Swinburne Island; for an anchorage area in Red Hook Flats to depths of 45, 40, and 35 feet over an area of 928 acres and an anchorage area in Gravesend Bay to 47 feet deep over area of 334 acres. Project depths refer to mean low water. Mean tidal range is 4.7 feet at Fort Hamilton; mean range of spring tides, 5.7 feet; irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 3.9 feet below mean low water up to 6.2 feet above mean high water. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 5, revised Vol. 2, 1978. Operations and results during period. The U.S. Hopper Dredge "GOETHALS" commenced work in Ambrose Channel on August 31, 1980 and completed work on November 25, 1980. Total cost for FY 1981 was $1,870,848 for maintenance. Condition as of September 30. Work under existing project began in 1885 and is 100 percent complete. Main Ship and Bayside-Gedney Channels were completed to 30 feet deep in February 1891. Deepening of Bayside- Gedney Channel to 35 feet for a width of 800 feet was completed in June 1939. Ambrose Channel was completed to 40 feet deep for a width of 2,000 feet in April 1914 and substantially completed to 45 feet deep for a width of 2,000 feet in 1951. Relocation of Anchorage Channel was completed to 40 feet deep in October 1932. Center 800 feet was dredged to 45 feet in June 1947 and westerly 600-foot strip in April 1948. Easterly 600-foot strip was substantially completed in June 1953. Channel between Staten Island and Hoffman and Swinburne Islands was completed in December 1920 up to within 300 feet of southerly limits of project. Dredged channel meets all needs of navigation and no further work of improvement is contemplated for the present. Channel along New Jersey pierhead line from Kill Van Kull to Anchorage Channel was completed in March 1939. Widening at bends near southerly and northerly ends authorized in 1948 was completed in November 1960. Red Hook Flats anchorage was completed to depths of 45, 40 and 35 feet in October 1976. Liberty (Bedloes) Island anchorage was completed to 20 feet in October 1944. Sandy Hook Channel (east section) was completed to a depth of 35 feet in June 1963. Gravesend Bay Anchorage was completed to a 47-foot depth in November 1977. 16. RARITAN RIVER, N.J. Location. Rises in north-central part of New Jersey and flows generally southeasterly into Raritan Bay, between Perth Amboy and South Amboy, about 24 miles by water south of the Battery, New York City. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 375.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1915, 1918, and 1938, pages 1777, 359 and 259, respectively. Existing project. A channel 25 feet deep and 300 feet wide extending 5.8 miles from turn in New York and New Jersey Channels near Great Beds Light to Government wharf on Main Channel, widened to 600 feet for 1,000 feet long opposite wharf to form a turning basin of same depth; thence a channel 15 feet deep and 200 feet wide 3 miles to Washington Canal; thence 10 feet deep in soft material, 11 feet deep in rock, and generally 100 feet wide with widening at bends 5 miles to Delaware and Raritan Canal entrance at New Brunswick, and a South Channel 25 feet deep and 300 feet wide 0.8 mile from junction with Main Channel at Keasby to upper limit of Titanium Pigment Co. property; thence 15 feet deep and 150 feet wide 0.4 mile to dock of Middlesex County Sewerage Authority; thence 10 feet deep and 150 feet wide 0.4 mile to dock of Middlesex County Sewerage Authority; thence 100 feet deep and 150 feet wide 2 miles to a point 1,300 feet below upper junction with Main Channel at Crab Island. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean range of tides is 5.1 feet at mouth of river and 5.6 feet at New Brunswick; mean range of spring tides, 6.1 and 6.6 feet respectively. Irregular fluctuations due to winds and atmospheric pressure vary from 3.6 feet below mean low water up to 6.9 feet above mean high water. New work for completed portion of project, consisting of channels described above cost $1,237,000, exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects and including $66,000 contributed by local interests. Dredging South Channel to 10 feet deep and 150 feet wide for 1,300 feet to upper junction with Main Channel at Crab Island is inactive and excluded from foregoing description and cost esti- 2-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 mate. Cost estimate for this portion is $86,000 (1954). (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Complied with except local interests must furnish spoil-disposal areas for maintenance to 25-foot channel from New York & Long Branch Railroad bridge to junction of Main and South Channels, and in South Channel to Titanium Pigment Co. property. River and Harbor Act of 1962, provides local interests furnish spoil-disposal areas and necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads and embankments therefore, required for maintenance of improvement, and hold the United States free from damages. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 5, revised 1965, Vol. 2, Part 2, pages 274-279 and 281. Operations and results during period. No work done in FY1981. Reconnaissance surveys cost $5,000. Condition as of September 30. Entire existing project is about 96 percent complete. Work under active portion of existing project was commenced September 1919 and completed July 1941. A shoal along northerly channel line in vicinity of Victory Bridge was eliminated by relocation of channel in February 1959. Main Channel dredged 25 feet deep and 300 feet wide from junction with New York and New Jersey Channels to and including a turning basin of same depth opposite Government wharf, thence 15 feet deep and 200 feet wide to mouth of Washington Canal, thence 10 and 11 feet deep and 100 feet wide to Delaware and Raritan Canal outlet locks at New Brunswick. South Channel dredged 25 feet deep and 300 feet wide for 3,200 feet, thence 10 feet deep and 150 feet wide for 12,400 feet to within 1,300 feet of junction with Main Channel at Crab Island. Model study of Raritan River was completed in March 1952. Work remaining under existing project is dredging South Channel to 10 feet deep and 150 feet wide for 1,300 feet to upper junction with Main Channel at Crab Island. 17. SHARK RIVER, N.J. Location. A small stream entering Atlantic Ocean 20 miles south of Sandy Hook on the New Jersey coast. 40 miles by water south of the Battery, New York City. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 795 and 1215.) Existing project. A 1.7 mile channel 18 feet deep at mean low water and 150 feet wide across the bar at entrance to inlet; thence 12 feet deep and generally 100 feet wide through main channel and south channel to Route 35 bridge; thence 8 feet deep and 100 feet wide to upper limit of the Belmar municipal boat basin, with additional depths and widths where necessary and practicable to produce satisfactory current velocities at bridges: and an anchorage 12 feet deep over about 7.3 acres east of Route 4-N bridge. Mean tidal range at mouth is 4 feet: mean range of spring tides 4.8 feet; irregular fluctuations due to wind and barometric pressure vary from 2.6 feet below mean low water up to 8.4 feet above mean high water. New work for completed project cost was $150,000. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation). Local Cooperation. Fully complied with except that local interests are required to furnish suitable spoil-disposal areas for maintenance. Terminal facilities. Two yacht basins are located on south shore of lower portion of Shark River. One is publicly owned and has a berthage of 2,600 feet. Several boatyards, boathouses, and landings for commercial and recreational craft are located in the lower portion of Shark River. Operations and results during period. A contract was awarded on September 4, 1981 for maintenance dredging of channel to restore project depths. Work stated on September 23, 1981 and continues in FY 1982. Costs for FY 1981 were $98,362 for engineering and design maintenance. Condition as of September 30. Work under the existing project was commenced June 1947 and completed October 1947. 18. SHOOTERS ISLAND, N.Y. & N.J. Location. Shooters Island is located in the southernmost end of Newark Bay, about 500 feet off Staten Island, with largest portion in New York (Richmond County) and remainder in New Jersey (Hudson and Union Counties). Existing project. The removal of Shooters Island was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1976, PL 94-587. The project plan consists of removal of all material, exclusive of drift sources, within the area defined by the Federal channels north and south of Shooters Island to a depth of 35 feet below mean low water, the material to be used for fill along the Arthur Kill. It includes the removal of soft material (4.5 million cubic yards) and rock (800,000 cubic yards) with disposal of the material at Howland Hook and other landfill areas in the vicinity. Total project cost is estimated at $72,600,000 with $1,000,000 estimated for preconstruction planning. It is estimated that project planning will take 4 years and project construction will take 4 years. Local cooperation. Local interests would provide all necessary lands, easements, rights-of-way and disposal areas for the project; hold the United States free from damages; accomplish any necessary relocations; and make a cash contribution if determined appropriate. Terminal facilities. None. Operations and results during period. None. Condition as of September 30. The Senate Appropriations Committee Report 95-1069 on FY1979 Appropriations Bill directed the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to prepare a report on the environmental impacts, cost sharing, and other aspects of the project. The report was submitted on August 6, 1979 and is currently under review by the Congress and Senate. 19. WESTCHESTER CREEK, N.Y. Location. A tidal stream flowing into East River from north at a point 14 miles by water northeast of the Battery, New York City. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12336.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1921 and 1938, pages 238 and 164, respectively. Existing project. A 2.6 mile channel 12 feet deep at mean low water, 100 feet wide for 2,000 feet through the estuary; thence 80 feet wide for 3,000 feet; and thence 60 2-10 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT feet wide 8,800 feet to head of navigation at East Tremont Avenue (Fort Schuyler Road), with widening at bends, and two turning basins, one near upper end of channel, the other near Eastern Boulevard (Unionport) Bridge. Mean tidal range, 7 feet; mean range of spring tides, 8.4 feet; irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 3.9 feet below mean low water up to 8.4 feet above mean high water. New work for completed active portion of the project cost $98,751 exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects. Dredging turning basin to a depth of 12 feet below mean low water, 250 by 250.feet in extent, 500 feet downstream from head of navigation, is inactive and excluded from foregoing description and cost estimate. Estimated cost of this portion (1965) is $38,000. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. River and Harbor Act of 1954 provides that local interests agree to furnish lands, easements, and rights-of-way for construction and maintenance and furnish suitable spoil-disposal areas for initial work and future maintenance as required; hold the United States free from damages; and provide and maintain a suitable bulkhead or other works approved by Chief of Engineers for retaining the east bank of the turning basin alongside Hutchinson River Parkway; and that local interests give assurances they will construct a public wharf when required. Requirements under prior acts have been fully complied with. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 5, revised 1978, Vol. 2. Operations and results during period. A contract for dredging to restore project dimensions (12 feet deep at mean low water), in the amount of $1,333,566 was awarded July 15, 1980. Work commenced August 11, 1980 and was completed on October 4, 1980. Total costs for FY 1981 was $6,981 for maintenance. A total of 336,890 cubic yards of material was removed. Condition as of September 30. Work under entire existing project is about 82 percent complete. Work under active portion of existing project commenced March 1932 and was completed May 1933. Upper 0.5 mile of the channel was relocated by city of New York in 1941. Head of navigation is at East Tremont Avenue, Bronx, about 2.6 miles above the mouth. Work remaining under existing project consists of dredging to 12 feet below mean low water a turning basin 250 by 250 feet in extent to be 500 feet downstream from head of navigation. Total cost of active portion of existing project to September 30, 1981 was $2,947,000 of which $98,751 was for new work and $2,848,329 for maintenance. 20. SUPERVISOR OF NEW YORK HARBOR (Prevention of Obstruction and Injurious Deposits) The District Engineer, New York District, was designated Supervisor of New York Harbor under the provisions of the River and Harbor Act of June 29,1888 (33 U.S.C. 441-451), as amended July 12, 1952. Under this Act, the Supervisor of New York Harbor is charged with the mission of preventing the deposit of obstructive and injurious materials in New York Harbor and its adjacent and tributary waters, including Long Island Sound. The Supervisor of New York Harbor is also responsible for enforcing the River and Harbor Act of August 18, 1894 (33 U.S.C. 452) which makes it unlawful for any person or persons to engage in fishing or dredging for shellfish in any of the channels leading to and from New York Harbor, or to interfere in any way with the safe navigation of those channels by ocean steamships and ships of deep draft. The River and Harbor Act of March 3, 1899 (33 U.S.C. 403, 407, 409), commonly known as the Refuse Act, applies to all navigable waters of the United States. This Statute is used for enforcement purposes by the New York District Engineer on waterway violations not within the scope of the Act of 1888 or on violations that occur within his area of jurisdiction outside of New York Harbor and Long Island Sound. The waters under the jurisdiction of the Supervisor of New York Harbor include New York Harbor and its tributaries, Raritan River, Arthur Kill, Newark Bay, Hackensack and Passaic Rivers, Kill Van Kull, Hudson River and its tributaries to the Federal Lock and Dam at Troy, New York, the East River and its tributaries, Harlem River and Long Island Sound. Enforcement of the Act of 1888 in Long Island Sound is limited to the Sound itself, ending at lines drawn between the headlands of the many inlets and harbors along its shores. The Supervisor of the Harbor, in his capacity as District Engineer, may apprehend violators of anti-pollution laws under authority of the Act of March 3, 1899 when violations occur in the inland tributary waters of Long Island Sound. The navigable waters of the Hudson River extending north from Troy, New York to the New York District boundary line at the Canadian border are under the jurisdiction of the District Engineer. The mission includes surveillance and inspection by Patrol Boat, to the 3-mile limit, of tows enroute to dumping grounds in the Atlantic Ocean to ensure that material is not illegally deposited in the waters of New York Harbor; patrol of inland waters, i.e. Long Island Sound and the Hudson River, to prevent illegal deposits that would have an adverse effect on navigation or anchorage; and prevention of interference with safe navigation in New York Harbor entrance channels and other waters under the jurisdiction of the New York District. Inspections of shorefront facilities and property are conducted by inspectors utilizing government vehicles equipped with two-way radios. These inspectors operate out of field offices located at Belle Meade and Jersey City, New Jersey, and Floyd Bennett Field, Fort Totten, Troy and Riverhead, New York, and Burlington, Vermont. Inspections of shorefront facilities are conducted on an 8- hour a day, five days a week schedule. The activities include inspection of construction work fill or excavation in waterways, including wetland areas, to determine if the individual or company concerned has a Department of the Army permit for such work, and if so, if the work is being performed in accordance with the provisions of the permit; investigation of illegal deposits of refuse into navigable waters or their tributaries, or on the shoreline where the material is subject to being washed into the waterways and adversely affect navigation; and obstruction, by vessels, to navigation. (See Table 2-E at end of chapter.) 21. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS (See Table 2-F at end of chapter.) 2-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 22. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Table 2-G at end of chapter.) 23. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation Activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 645, 86th Congress as amended (Preauthorization). Cost for preauthorization study to complete reconnaissance report was $1,000 on Sheepshead Bay, N.Y. Cost to start Detailed Project Report was $17,025. Costs for Detailed Project Report on Whale Creek, Matawan Twsp, N.J. was $18,540. Beach Erosion Control 24. EAST ROCKAWAY INLET TO ROCKAWAY INLET & JAMAICA BAY, N.Y. (PT. I) Location. Atlantic coast of New York City, between East Rockaway and Rockaway Inlets, and the lands within and surrounding Jamaica Bay. The coastal area (about 10 miles long) is a peninsula in Queens County separating the ocean and the bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 12327, 12350, and 12326.) Existing project. The project provides for approximately 8.7 million cubic yards of sand fill including the advanced placement of a two year supply of beach nourishment, and Federal participation in the cost of periodic beach nourishment of the shore protection works for 10 years after completion of the initial beach fill. Federal participation (50 percent) includes $9,280,000 (October 1981) first cost and $1,382,000 annually for 10 years for beach nourishment a total of $23,100,000. Local cooperation. Local interests must provide lands and rights-of-way, including borrow areas; bear 50.0 percent of total first cost presently estimated at $23,100,000 consisting of a cash contribution of $9,280,000 the final apportionment of cost to be made after actual costs and values have been determined and $1,382,000 annually for periodic nourishment for 10 years, total non-Federal cost $23,100,000, hold the United States free from damages; maintain, during economic life of project, continued public ownership and use of non-Federal publicly-owned shores upon which Federal participation in beach protection is based; maintain and operate all works after completion, control water pollution to the extent necessary to safeguard the health of bathers; local cooperation agreement was executed by the State May 17, 1974 and approved for Secretary of Army May 31, 1974. On May 22, 1974 sent to State an approved Escrow Agreement. Operations and results during period. Re-design for construction of a terminal groin at Beach 149 Street was completed. Condition as of September 30. Advance engineering and design is completed. Final Environmental Impact Statement on file with Council of Environmental Quality on April 16, 1971. Initial beach restoration completed in FY1977. Contract for first increment of periodic nourishment completed in May 1980. Completion of 10 year periodic nourishment and construction of groin remain. Design for construction of a terminal groin at Beach 149 Street is completed. 25. FIRE ISLAND INLET, TO JONES INLET, N.Y. Location. Atlantic Coast of Long Island, N.Y., between Fire Island Inlet and Jones Inlet, about 15 miles. Fire Island Inlet is on south shore of Long Island, about 50 miles by water south and east of the Battery, New York City, and connects Great South Bay and the Atlantic Ocean. Jones Inlet is on south shore of Long Island, about 37 miles by water south and east of the Battery, New York City, and connects Hempstead Bay and the Atlantic Ocean. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12352.) Existing project. Provides for Federal participation in restoration and protection of shore from Fire Island to Jones Inlets by dredging inlet shoal in Fire Island Inlet and construction of a sand dike to relieve pressure of tidal currents against Oak Beach, to provide a deposition area for littoral drift, and to obtain fill material for a feeder beach and Oak Beach. Authorization initially provided for three dredging operations over a period of 10 years, but was reduced to two, based on subsequently authorized project modification for sand bypassing facilities and on limited reduction of channel maintenance costs of navigation project. For first increment, based on cost sharing provisions of Public Law 727, 79th Congress, pertinent to beach erosion control benefits, Federal participation was authorized to extent of one-third of costs allocated to beach erosion control feature and entire cost allocated to navigation feature, a total of 42 percent for first increment. Based on provisions of 1962 River and Harbor Act enacted after completion of first increment, which modified Federal participation to extent of one-half of costs allocated to beach erosion control feature, and on deletion of navigation benefits based on maintenance experience, Federal share of second increment was evaluated at 67.9 percent. Project, as modified, provides for combined beach erosion control and navigation improvements comprising a 1,000-foot extension of existing jetty, a littoral reservoir with a capacity of 1,200,000 cubic yards west of jetty, a navigation channel 28 feet deep and 500 feet wide leading from the littoral reservoir to a deposition reservoir inside the inlet with a capacity of 2 million cubic yards, and other appurtenant works including jetty modifications to permit fishermen use, and dikes. Estimated Federal share of participation is 60.5 percent of the first cost of project modification. Periodic transfer of littoral drift involving the bypassing of 1,200,000 cubic yards of sand on the average of once every 2 years to a feeder beach over the economic life of the project, serving both maintenance of navigation channel and nourishment of beaches westerly of the inlet, is included in annual maintenance. Mean range of tide is 4.1 feet. Total estimated Federal cost of new work is $52,346,767 (October 1981), of which $2,646,767 is for work authorized by 1958 River and Harbor Act, and $49,700,000 for modification authorized by 1962 River and Harbor Act. Project documents contain latest published maps. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) 2-12 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT Local cooperation. River and Harbor Act of 1958 provides local interests to obtain approval by Chief of Engineers, before starting work on any feature of project, of detailed plans and specifications and arrangements for prosecuting work on that feature; provide lands, and rights-of-ways; hold the United States free from damages; assure that water pollution that would endanger health of bathers will not be permitted; assure maintenance of recommended project during its useful life as may be required to insure realization of anticipated benefits; and assure continued public ownership of the shore and its administration for public use during economic life of project. Long Island State Park Commission of State of New York, the cooperating agency, entered into an agreement with United States August 21, 1958, as modified November 18, 1959, and February 1, 1962, in which the agency adopted plan of improvement for beach erosion control authorized by Congress and agreed to furnish its share of cost, and comply with all other requirements of local cooperation. By letter dated October 7, 1958, cooperating agency requested United States to undertake and supervise construction of first increment of work. First modification to agreement enabled construction by Federal Government of a sand closure across gorge channel which was completed in 1960 at a cost of $364,000 from funds furnished by cooperating agency (contributed funds-other). Second modification enabled delineation of sand closure as a part of authorized project in accordance with Public Works Appropriation Act, 1962, which included $152,880 (42 percent of $364,000) specifically for repayment of Federal share of cost. Unused contributed funds, surplus to feeds of first increment, were returned May 17, 1962. Second dredging operation was financially complete April 30, 1966, and unused required contributed funds were returned July 7, 1966. In addition to assurances similar to those cited for the work under the 1958 act, local interests, for the work under the 1962 act, must provide and maintain a parking lot with adequate sanitary facilities as may be required for recreational fishermen use of the jetty extension; and contribute about 39.5 percent of total first cost, 32.1 percent of periodic dredging cost allocated to beach erosion control for beach nourishment, and 9.8 percent of maintenance cost. Off-project fishing facilities are a non-Federal responsibility. Total estimated cost of local cooperation to be provided by local interests is $34,942,335 (October 1981) for new work, of which $2,272,335 (cash contribution) is for work authorized by the 1958 act; and $32,670,000 the 1962 act, of which $32,600,000 is cash contribution and $70,000 is other non- Federal costs for off-project facilities; exclusive of shares of annual periodic dredging and maintenance costs. Assurances executed with State April 27, 1973 approved by Secretary of Army May 24, 1973. Operations and results during period. Reconnaissance survey and study of the project was initiated in FY1980. Cost to date $23,614 for Fiscal Year. A study of the inlet dynamics and an assessment of the work completed to date has been initiated. Condition as of September 30. Under the 1958 Act, the first dredging operation is complete at a cost of $1,124,826 exclusive of $1,553,331 required contributed funds. Second dredging operation is complete at a cost of $1,521,941, exclusive of $719,504 required contributed funds. Engineering and design for work under the 1962 act was initiated in April 1965. Model test by Waterways Experiment Station was completed and report submitted November 1969. Design Memorandum was submitted to Chief of Engineers September 1971 and was approved February 1971 subject to comments, which were submitted April 1971. Advance plans and specifications submitted April 1971. The Environmental Impact Statement was submitted to the Council of Environmental Quality April 16, 1971. Contract #1 awarded June 8, 1973, and physically complete May 22, 1974. Contract #2 was awarded in June 12, 1974. Construction was commenced in July 1974 and was terminated in April 1975. Contract #3 was awarded on August 27, 1975. Construction was commenced in June 1976 and completed in June 1977. The contract area dredged is about 4,100 feet long, 500 feet wide, and follows the alignment of the outer portion of the existing jetty. The edge of the area lies about 250 feet west ofjetty and extends a distance of about 300 feet seaward of the jetty light. The dredged depths were as follows: The inner 650 foot length was dredged to 14 feet below mean low water; the middle 2,900 foot portion to 30 feet, and the outer 550 foot portion to 16 feet. A dredging overdepth of 2 feet was allowed in the contract. Near the end of Contract #3 hydrographic surveys showed that a shoal had formed in the seaward end of the contract area so that a clear navigation could not be obtained by completion of the contract work. Accordingly the remaining work was modified and realigned to permit dredging of a 500 foot wide channel with a depth of 16 feet through the shoal. This work was completed in June 1977 within the available funds. The 30 foot dredged portion is also intended to serve as a littoral reservoir to trap the predominant westward littoral drift moving past the end of the jetty and into the inlet. Funds of $21,000 were allotted to the Waterways Experiment Station in January 1975 for a computer aided historical photo-analysis study of the Fire Island Inlet system. The report on the study was issued in September 1977. A study of the inlet dynamics and an assessment of the work completed to date has been initiated. 26. OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 2-H at end of chapter.) 27. BEACH EROSION CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Beach Erosion Control activities pursuant to Section 103 Public Law 826, 84th Congress as amended (preauthorization). Cost for preauthorization study to start and complete reconnaissance report was: $3,500 on Long Island Sound, Orchard Beach, NYC, N.Y. Cost to start detailed project report was $6,662 on Orchard Beach, Bronx, N.Y. Construction of a beach erosion control project at Neptune City, N.J. was completed in January 1981 at a cost of $44,562. Engineering and design for a project modification is underway. 2-13 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 Flood Control 28. ARDSLEY, N.Y. Location. The Village of Ardsley in Westchester County, New York is located on the Saw Mill River approximately 5 miles upstream from its junction with the Hudson River, (See U.S. Geological Survey Map, White Plains, N.Y.) Existing project. The Federal Flood Control Project provides for relocation of the existing channel from the upstream limit of the project downstream for approximately 990 feet, and providing 155 feet of concrete flume upstream from the Old Ashford Avenue bridge. Upstream of this flume along the left bank of the Saw Mill River, 510 feet of levee would be constructed along the modified channel with an additional 340 feet of closure levee. Below the Old Ashford Avenue bridge, a 60 foot L-type flood wall would be built adjacent to an existing building and capping on additional 70 feet of existing flood walls downstream of this building. Between the Conrail Railroad Bridge and Elm Street in the downtown portion of the project, 145 feet of flood wall would be constructed on the right bank of the river. A pumping station, ponding area, drainage ditches and other drainage structures will be provided. The total estimated Federal cost for the project is $2,880,000 exclusive of land, relocations and other work to be provided by local interests at an estimated cost of $870,000. Local cooperation. Local interests must provide all lands, easements and rights-of-way, including spoil areas, within the areas necessary for construction; hold and save the United. States free from damages; maintain without expense to the United States all works after completion; provide without cost to the United States for relocation of utilities and resurfacing of a parking lot; protect the channel and flood control works from future encroachment or obstruction, including waste disposal, that would reduce their flood-carrying capacity; agree to take appropriate measures to control development of the fringe areas not protected by the improvement, with a view to preventing an undue increase in the flood damage potential; provide a pumping station or additional gravity outlets, due to the modification of or encroachment upon, such area by local interests; agree to adopt and enforce adequate land use and control measures in the area within the village along the Saw Mill River that will not be protected by the recommended project; agree to be bound by and to incorporate into, any contract for construction, the prescribed Equal Opportunity Clause, and to cooperate actively in obtaining the compliance of contractors and subcontractors with said Equal Opportunity Clause, in accordance with Title V of Civil Rights Act of 1964 as it pertains to civil works projects; at least annually notify interests affected that the improvements will not provide protection from floods greater than the design condition. New York State is the Local Cooperating Agency. The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, by letter dated August 15, 1979, reaffirmed the State's intention to cooperate in the proposed plan. Operation and results during period. Preconstruction planning continued. Condition as of September 30. Plan of Study approved in March 1979. Preconstruction planning started in February 1979. Preconstruction planning continued through Fiscal Year 1980. 29. ELIZABETH, N.J. Location. In city of Elizabeth, N.J. (Union County), extending 4.2 miles upstream from mouth of Elizabeth River at Arthur Kill. The river continues 7.7 miles northward through Union and Essex counties to its headwaters in East Orange, N.J. (See Geological Survey quadrangles, Roselle, Elizabeth, Caldwell and Orange; and Army Map Service quadrangles, similarly designated.) Existing project. Includes an improved channel with levees and/or walls where necessary between Bridge Street and Arthur Kill (2.1 miles); a concrete channel between Trotter's Lane and U.S. Highway No. 1 (1.4 miles); closure to high ground at upstream and downstream ends; interior drainage, including 5 pumping stations and 11 ponding areas; reconstruction or replacement of 16 bridges and associated street regrading; and utilities relocations. Total estimated Federal cost is $63,600,000. Total estimated non-Federal cost for all requirements of local cooperation excluding maintenance is $12,160,000 including $1,170,000 cash contribution. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must provide lands and rights-of-way for construction and subsequent maintenance, the costs and values incurred in the interest of hurricane tidal flood protection to be credited to required local contribution to the project first costs allocated to hurricane tidal flood protection; hold the United States free from damages; maintain and operate completed works including all dredging required in the channel to maintain the design depths in the tidal reach; reconstruct all bridges and approaches except railroad bridges, and relocate existing sewerage and drainage facilities, streets, utilities, and other structures, such costs and values incurred in interest of hurricane tidal flood protection to be credited to required local contribution to protect first costs allocated to hurricane tidal flood protection; bear 30 percent of first costs allocated to hurricane tidal flood protection, including the two items listed above pertaining to lands, reconstruction and alterations, and a cash contribution now estimated at $1,170,000 to be paid either in a lump sum before starting construction, or in installments before starting construction, or in installments before starting pertinent work items in accordance with construction schedules as required by the Chief of Engineers; take necessary action to protect channels from future obstruction or encroachment including waste disposal that would reduce their flood-carrying capacity; take appropriate measures to control development in partially protected areas and fringe areas not included in the project with a view to preventing an undue increase in flood damage potential; maintain existing natural detention areas along the Elizabeth River between Union Avenue and Trotters Lane free from encroachment so as not to reduce their detention capacity; to provide any additional gravity outlets or pumping station capacities made necessary by any modifications or encroachments on the ponding areas; bear any increased Federal costs for the improvement that may result from any future requirements for parkway developments; and at least annually, 2-14 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT notify interests affected that the improvements will not provide complete protection from fluvial floods greater than in July 1897. Agency responsible for local cooperation is City of Elizabeth (with concurrence of Union County and State of New Jersey). Signed assurances of local cooperation were accepted by the District Engineer on January 9, 1970. Operations and results during period. Construction of the Downstream Section and Engineering and Design for the Upstream Section of the project continued. Condition as of September 30. Advance planning (begun January 1966), leading to first construction (Ursino Basin) add the Penn-Central Bridge and downstream dredging contracts, has been completed. General design memorandum and its supplement submitted. Penn-Central Railroad Bridge agreement executed. Environmental impact statement submitted to the Council on Environmental Quality on April 20, 1971. Upstream Ursino Basin construction complete. Contract, executed with New Jersey Department of Transportation on June 2, 1977 for placement of 132 foot section of flume to be accomplished in conjunction with bridge replacement, has been completed. Contract for the Downstream Area Arthur Kill to U.S. Highway #1, was awarded September 29, 1978 with completion scheduled in 1982. Upstream contract scheduled to be awarded in fiscal year 1982. 30. FIRE ISLAND INLET TO MONTAUK POINT, N.Y. Location. That portion of Atlantic Coast of Long Island in Suffolk County extending from Fire Island Inlet easterly to Montauk Point, N.Y.-about 83 miles long. This frontage, comprises about 70 percent of total ocean frontage of Long Island. Fire Island Inlet is about 50 miles by water east of the Battery, New York City. (See Coast and Geodetic Charts 13209, 12354 and 12353.) Existing project. Provides for Federal participation in improvement to prevent beach erosion and hurricane damages by: widening beaches along developed areas between Kismet and Mecox Bay to a minimum width of 100 feet at elevation 14 feet above mean sea level; raising dunes to an elevation of 16 feet above mean sea level from Fire Island Inlet to Hither Hills State Park, at Montauk and opposite Lake Montauk Harbor; planting grass on dunes; constructing gated interior drainage structures at Mecox Bay, Sagaponack Lake, and Georgica Pond; constructing not to exceed 50 groins, if needed; and Federal participation in cost of beach nourishment for not to exceed 10 years from year of completion of a useful nourishment unit. Total estimated Federal cost is $275,000,000 (October 1981) which includes participation in periodic beach nourishment for 10 years at $455,000 annually. Total estimated non-Federal cost for all requirements of local cooperation is $175,000,000 inclusive of $101,000,000 cash contribution by local interests. Project cost estimate reflects revised cost sharing provisions of 1962 River and Harbor Act.'Increased Federal participation from about 53 percent due to an adjustment of cost sharing in accordance with Section 31 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1974 to about 70 percent of first cost of project construction, excluding annual nourishment costs. Local cooperation. River and Harbor Act of 1960 provides that before starting construction, local interests give assurance they will (a) provide lands, rights-of-way, including borrow areas, for construction; (b) make alterations and relocations of buildings, streets, storm drains, utilities, and other structures made necessary by construction; (c) bear 30 percent of total first cost estimated at $175,000,000 to consist of items listed in (a) and (b) above and a cash contribution estimated at $101,000,000 or, if any section is undertaken separately apportionment of first cost will be as shown in District Engineer's report, with due regard to change in public use and ownership and other changes before construction; provided that cash contribution be paid either in a lump sum before starting entire project, or in installments before starting pertinent items, in accordance with construction schedules as required by Chief of Engineers, final apportionment of cost to be made after actual costs and values have been determined; (d) hold the United States free from damages; (e) maintain all works and undertake periodic beach nourishment after completion, except that for 10 years after completion of a useful nourishment unit Federal Government would contribute, dependent on conditions of public use and ownership and other changes at time of construction an amount for entire project now estimated at $455,000 annually; (f) maintain during economic life of project continued public ownership of non-Federal publicly owned shores and continued availability for public use of privately owned shore equivalent to that upon which recommended Federal participation is based; (g) adopt appropriate ordinances to provide for preservation of dunes and their protective vegetation; (h) control water pollution to extent necessary to safeguard health of bathers; (i) obtain approval of Chief of Engineers of detailed plans and specifications for work contemplated and arrangements for its prosecution before starting any work on beach protection phase of project for which Federal participation is planned, if undertaken separately from recommended combined project; and (j) contribute in cash toward cost of hurricane protection works constructed under this plan, in addition to apportionment required in (c) above, an amount equal to increased Federal cost resulting from separate construction of beach protection work referred to in (i) above. Responsible agency is State of New York. On July 30, 1963, the State reflected the desires of Suffolk County, requested the inclusion of a minimum of 13 groins in initial construction of Moriches-Shinnecock reach. Chief of Engineers concurred in inclusion of up to 13 groins. Assurances were executed by Superintendent of Public Works, State of New York, on August 14, and accepted by the District Engineer August 20, 1963. On February 5, 1964, the State requested consideration of a plan, as proposed by Suffolk County, for initial construction of 13 groins of which 11 would be in the Moriches-Shinnecock reach, and 2 in the Southampton- Beach Hampton reach in vicinity of Georgica Pond; and that sandfill and dune construction be withheld for the present except for 1 mile on each side of Shinnecock Inlet. On February 27, 1964, the Chief of Engineers accepted the proposals, in part, and supplemental assurances were executed by State of New York on April 20, 1964, and accepted by District Engineer April 27, 1964, as follows: the State of New York now elects to proceed with authorized combined beach erosion control and hurricane protection project for South Shore of Long Island; that Superintend- 2-15 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 ent of Public Works hereby reaffirms his assurance of August 14, 1963, relative to complete project; that State of New York, as cooperating agency, will now agree that artifical fills will be added when and to extent found necessary by the Chief of Engineers, but not earlier than 3 years after completion of groins unless both the State of New York and the Chief of Engineers mutually agree to an earlier placement; that the superintendent agrees for State of New York to contribute the full amount of any increase in Federal costs resulting from the separate construction of the groins and subsequent fill; and that the State agree that construction of the two groins in the Georgica Pond area will depend on a favorable finding, following a study by the Chief of Engineers. Study was completed July 31, 1964, recommending construction, and approved by the Chief of Engineers on September 22, 1964. By letter dated November 5, 1964, the New York State Department of Public Works confirmed that title to all properties and interests in properties necessary for constructing the 11 groins was fully vested in Suffolk County. By letter dated December 7, 1964, the Department stated that the county had obtained easements or fee title for the parcels necessary for constructing the two groins. New York State Department of Public Works furnished $844,600 and $830,330 required contributed funds October 30, 1964, and September 7, 1965, respectively, for construction of 11 groins in Moriches-Shinnecock reach, and $439,900 on January 22, 1965, for construction of 2 groins in Georgica Pond area of the Southampton-Beach Hampton reach. The completed 2 groins and 11 groins were accepted by the New York State Department of Public Works for maintenance on May 11, 1966 and April 10, 1967, respectively. On March 22, 1965, the State recommended that planning priority be in the order: Southampton-Beach Hampton (drainage structures first); Shinnecock Inlet- Southampton; Beach Hampton-Montauk Point; and Fire Island Inlet-Moriches Inlet. Planning on the drainage structures was initiated but was suspended, based on: meeting of October 28, 1965 with the Georgica Pond Association and the Preservation Society of East End wherein concern was indicated regarding the effects of the proposed drainage structure on ecology, salinity, pond level and aesthetic values; meeting with the Congressional representatives, State legislators, Federal agencies and local officials held on May 26, 1966; and resolution of the Suffolk County Board of Supervisors adopted June 13, 1966 requesting advancement of the planning of the Fire Island Inlet-Moriches Inlet reach (Fire Island National Seashore). On June 16, 1967, the New York State Department of Public Works requested that the following works be undertaken as immediate priority items: in Moriches-Shinnecock Reach, beach and dune fill at 11 groin site, construction of four groins west of the completed 11 groins, beach and dune fill east of the 11 groins; in Southampton- Beach Hampton reach (at East Hampton), construction of two additional groins, and the outlet structure at Georgica Pond. On March 18, 1968 the Suffolk County Board of Supervisors adopted a resolution supporting construction of 4 groins in Reach 2 (Moriches-Shinnecock) and 2 groins in Reach 4 (Southampton-Beach Hampton). On April 22, 1968 the Board adopted a more inclusive resolution authorizing participation in beach erosion and hurricane protection for the Moriches-Shinnecock reach and in the Georgica Pond area of the Southampton-Beach Hampton reach. On December 24, 1968, the Commissioner of the New York State Conservation Department executed the second supplement to the assurances of local cooperation, which was accepted by the District Engineer on January 24, 1969. The reaffirmed previous assurances contained provisions for constructing four additional groins in an area extending 6,000 feet west from the most westerly groin in the existing eleven-groin field in the Moriches Inlet to Shinnecock Inlet Reach, and for placing beach and dune fill in this area to the full design cross section as defined in the authorized project report, except for the portion of the dune mean sea level elevation 16 feet and 20 feet. Thus this stage construction established the top of dune to an elevation of 16 feet m.s.1. with a 65 foot width at that elevation and the top of berm to 14 feet m. s.1. with a 100 foot width at that elevation. These assurances also required that the State obtain and provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rightsof- way, to permit entry for the period of construction, and that the necessary rights will be obtained, as required, of lands, easements and rights-of-way, for maintenance and repair of the groins, dunes, and berms, and to insure the integrity of the completed structure. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Continued study of coastal protection needs for present and future conditions. Planning was completed in period for another increment of work at Westhampton Beach in the Moriches Inlet to Shinnecock Inlet reach, consisting of placement of beach and dune fill in the initial 11 groin field constructed in 1966 and along the 9,500 feet of shore westward of the existing groin. field. The draft Environmental Impact Statement on the entire project was revised and a final Environmental Impact Statement prepared for review and approval prior to submission to the Council on Environmental Quality. At the request of the local cooperating agency a Phase I design study was initiated in the Fire Island Inlet to Moriches Inlet reach of the project. This was terminated June 6, 1978 when the Council on Environmental Quality recommended the project be reformulated. Active scoping for reformulation commenced in July 1979. Operations and results during period. Continued common base studies for reformulation. Public scoping meetings October 1980. Interagency scoping review meeting January 1980, with Federal agencies agreeing, but New York State having strong reservations. District Engineer of New York formalized his decision March 1980. Governor of New York and Council on Environmental Quality informed May 1980. Plan of study submitted July 1980. Condition as of September 30. Engineering and design began November 1962 and project construction commenced in January 1965. Two groins in Reach 4: Southampton- Beach Hampton, Section 3, were initiated in March, and completed in September 1965, at a total cost of $720,950 of which $382,109 were incurred against required contributed funds. Eleven groins in Reach 2: Moriches-Shinnecock, Section 2, were initiated in January 1965, and completed in October 1966 at a total cost of $2,854,565 of which $1,370,191 were incurred against required contributed funds. Initial beach fill placement for 750,000 cubic yards in Reach 2, Section 1A was completed on May 23, 1969. On August 4, 1969 work started on 4 groins and sandfill in Reach 2, Section 1A and was completed November 14, 1970. 3,083 tons of stone and 1,111,000 cubic yards of sand was placed. Total cost for all Section 1A was $3,663,455 including $1,791,428 required 2-16 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT contributed funds. Planning for another increment of work at Westhampton Beach underway. Funds in amount of $70,000 were allotted on April 14, 1977 for initiation of the Phase I study in Reach I, Fire Island Inlet to Moriches Inlet. Environmental Impact Statement on entire project prepared. The final Environmental Impact Statement was filed with Environmental Protection Agency on January 28, 1978. On March 7, 1978 Department of the Interior supported by other agencies referred the Environmental Impact Statement to Council on Environmental Quality as unacceptable. On June 6, 1978, the Council on Environmental Quality agreed with the unacceptable finding and recommended project reformulation. Subsequent to strong objections on the project's final Environmental Impact Statement, meeting were held in September 1978, January and July 1979 with Department of Interior, Environmental Protection Agency and other interested Federal agencies. Subsequently, the Federal agencies have agreed to a basis for the reformulation of the Fire Island to Montauk Point project, including a general agreement on the studies necessary to answer the outstanding concerns. Public meetings were held in October 1979 in order to delineate the full scope and level of effort needed to reformulate the project. A final scoping session was held January 17, 1980 and agreement reached between the Federal agencies although New York State had strong objections. A plan of study was submitted in July 1980. Reformulation continues. Conclusion with a new General Design Memorandum is scheduled for 1987. Completion of engineering and design, and construction of the project remain. Coordination made with the Departments of Interior and Commerce and the Environmental Protection Agency to develop an acceptable solution to mitigate immediate threats to property and human welfare at Westhampton Beach where serious erosion is occurring. The interim plan has been accepted by the Departments of Interior and Commerce in letters dated December 22, 1978 and December 21, 1979 respectively. Subsequently, in a letter dated January 18, 1979, Council on Environmental Quality approved the Corps' intention to take interim remedial action in cooperation with the interested agencies. The supplemental General Design Memorandum and the Environmental Analysis have been completed. Plans and specifications have been completed. Initiation of construction in Westhampton, scheduled for FY 1981, has been indefinitely postponed due to NY State's inability to financially participate in the project at the present time. It should be noted that the proposed work at Westhampton Beach is a remedial measure to alleviate the present erosion problem. Upon completion of the reformulation study, the recommended plan of the study will be implemented for the entire Fire Island Inlet to Montauk Point Reach, including Westhampton Beach. 31. LIBERTY STATE PARK LEVEE AND SEAWALL, N.J. Location. At Liberty Park, in Jersey City, Hudson County, New Jersey, directly behind Ellis Island and the Statue of Liberty, in Upper New York Bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 12334.) Existing project. Construction of a protective levee and seawall and associated landfill along the Park shoreline, approximately 7,000 feet long, extending from south of Liberty Island to North of Ellis Island. Estimated first cost of improvement under the Water Resources Development Act of 1976 is $28,400,000 (October 1981) including $8,500,000 cash contribution from local interests. Local cooperation. Local cooperation conditions provide that local interests must furnish all necessary lands, easements, and rights-of-way for the project and contribute 30 per centum of the total project costs exclusive of land costs. Operations and results during period. Coordination and preconstruction planning for the entire project continued. Condition as of September 30. Preconstruction planning continued. 32. PASSAIC RIVER BASIN, N.J. & N.Y. Location. The Passaic River Basin, comprising 787 square miles in northeastern New Jersey and 148 square miles southern New York State, is located in the greater New York City Metropolitan area. The Passaic River Basin is roughly elliptical in shape-26 miles long and 56 miles wide-and in New Jersey contains the major portions of Bergen, Essex, Morris and Passaic Counties and lesser parts of Hudson, Somerset, Sussex and Union Counties. The Basin also includes parts of Orange and Rockland Counties in New York. Previous projects. Two Federal flood control projects have been completed by the Corps of Engineers in the Passaic River Basin. A $67,400 desnagging, debris removal and channel restoration project was completed in 1951 along Beaver Brook and the Pequannock Township Ditch, tributaries of the Pompton River in Pequannock Township, N.J. Along the Pompton River, a channel clearing project including shoal removal and channel restoration was implemented in the two-mile reach from the Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Railroad Bridge to the Erie Railroad (Greenwood Lake Branch) Bridge. This work, in Pequannock Township, Wayne Township and Lincoln Park Borough, N.J., was completed in 1954 at a cost of $50,000. Existing project. The project was authorized for Phase I advance engineering and design study in Section 101(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1976 in accordance with the February 18, 1976 report of the Chief of Engineers. The estimate of Federal Cost under the authorizing legislation is $1,110,000,000 (October 1981), plus a $2,620,000 cash contribution from local interests, and $127,380,000 for items of work to be contributed by local interests. The recommended plan for flood protection, navigation, hurricane protection and recreation, includes a flood detention reservoir, channel diversions and modifications, levees and floodwalls, and streambank filling and grading. These works would provide protection against a storm with a recurrence interval of 235 years, which is 20 percent larger than the October 1903 flood of record. Six independent tributary local protection plans are also recommended. However, because of a lack of public support for structural components of the project in the New Jersey 2-17 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 portion of the Basin, the entire project is being reformulated during the Phase I study. The House Public Works Committee Report (94-1702) on the 1976 Water Resources Development Act directed ". .. the reformulation of the plan for water management and flood control for the entire Passaic Basin." This report further states that local opposition to any plan, which relies upon extensive use of dikes, dams and levees, such as those proposed in previous survey reports, mandates that the following alternatives, or any combination thereof, shall be the only ones surveyed and considered: (a) A full range of nonstructural flood control alternatives to include land acquisition, flood plain mapping, floodproofing, developing early warning systems and relocation of buildings; (b) A tunnel diversion plan; (c) A system of tunnels addressing the needs of the entire basin; (d) Plans that combine local protection works where locally acceptable and nonstructural solutions including improvements to stream carrying capacity in accordance with different needs in the Lower Basin and in the Central Basin; (e) Evaluation of fulfilling water supply objectives together with flood control; (f) Aquifer recharge and underground storage; and (g) Reservoir management in the headwaters. The Phase I Study is evaluating these alternatives in the formulation of revised plans. Condition as of September 30. The reformulation study was initiated in October 1977 under the existing authorization and the Congressional guidance in House Report 94-1702. The Study schedule runs through March 1985 at an estimated cost of $14 million. During FY 1981, the major portion of the Stage II preliminary plan formulation was completed. This involved preliminary development and analysis of Passaic Basin-wide alternatives including tunnel diversion plans, detention basins, presentation of natural storage areas, and aquifer recharge. More detailed preliminary local protection plans have been developed for localized flood problem areas including the Ramapo River at Mahwah, N.J.-Suffern, N.Y.; and in New Jersey along the Ramapo River at Oakland, the Upper Rockaway River Basin, Molly Ann's Brook, the Peckman River, and in the Upper and Lower Passaic Subbasin areas. Work items completed during the year included baseline wildlife and aquatic inventories, cultural resources reconnaissance surveys at six major flood damage areas throughout the Basin; and preliminary real estate value surveys in the Central Passaic River Basin. Major effort was involved in the completion of the Basin-wide flood damage survey and an associated flood plain buildings data bank. 33. RARITAN BAYAND SANDY HOOK BAY, N.J. Location. Comprises about 21 miles of coast in Middlesex and Monmouth Counties, N.J., and is about 30 miles southwest of New York City. It extends along Raritan and Sandy Hook Bays between entrances to Raritan River on the west and Shrewsbury River on the east. Sandy Hook, N.J., a low-lying peninsula on the east, separates Atlantic Ocean from Sandy Hook Bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 70, 286, 369, 824, 1000, 1108, 1215; and Geological Survey quadrangles of South Amboy, Keyport and Sandy Hook.) Existing project. Federal participation in constructing levees, beach fill, interior drainage facilities and groins for beach erosion control and hurricane protection. For Madison Township section, combined shore and hurricane protection improvement provides for: about 1.7 miles of beach fill at elevations of 5.5, 10, and 15 feet above mean sea level; about 0.4 mile of tieback levees at 15 feet above mean sea level; and interior drainage facilities. Shore protection improvement is provided for Matawan Township and Borough of Union Beach sections, including about 0.9 miles of beach fill at elevations of 5.5 and 10 feet above mean sea level for Matawan, and about 0.6 mile of beach fill at 5.5 feet above mean sea level for Union Beach. In the Borough of Keansburgh, East Keansburg, and West Keansburg, hurricane protection is provided, including about 2.7 miles of beach fill and 2.3 miles of tieback levees at an elevation of 15 feet above mean sea level; interior drainage structures; hurricane gate; and three groins in Keansburg for shore protection. Design studies relocated for Keansburgh-East Keansburg closure to an alignment west of Thorne Creek and provide additional protection in West Keansburg. Total estimated Federal cost is $8,960,000 which includes $537,000 reimbursement to local interests as federal share of costs incurred for beach protection accomplished at Keansburg in 1957. Total estimated non-Federal cost for all requirements of local cooperation is $4,990,000, including $4,453,000 cash contribution. Project cost estimate reflects the cost sharing provisions of 1962 River and Harbor Act. These new provisions, resulted in increase in Federal participation from about 64.8 percent to about 66.4 percent of estimated project cost exclusive of reimbursable completed work at Keansburg. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Complied with for the Madison and Keansburg-East-West Keansburg sections, except for those provisions affecting continuing actions such as operation and maintenance. For details see 1970 Annual Report. By resolution dated December 2, 1963, Matawan Township declined to participate in the project at the present time. The State then requested construction of Matawan Township section be deferred for inclusion in a later contract. In 1974, local interests had proposed a master plan for park development along the Cliffwood Beach portion of Matawan Township, now known as Aberdeen Township, generally in the area of the authorized Federal improvement. The third phase of the master plan provided for restoration of a fronting beach which would be opened for public recreational use. In December 1974, local interests requested that the beach restoration work which they intended to accomplish, be considered as meeting the authorized Federal plan and requested consideration for Federal reimbursement under Section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1968. Subsequently, they prepared a General Design Memorandum for the beach restoration work and submitted it for review and approval in September 1977. Approval of the General Design Memorandum was made in June 1978. Approval for the Chief of Engineers to execute a supplemental local cooperating agreement under Section 215 of Public Law 90-483 was made by the Chairman of the House and Senate Subcommittees on Public Works, Committees on Appropriations, on September 8, 1978 and October 23, 1978, respectively. The agreement was executed by local interests on February 21, 1979 2-18 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT and by the Chief of Engineers on May 22, 1979. Construction of the work is anticipated in Fiscal Year 1980. A supplemental agreement for Union Beach will be executed if and when construction planning is started. Operations and results during period. Planning continued for possible modification to closure structural. Condition as of September 30. Engineering and design of existing project commenced November 1962 and resulted in the completion of design studies, and plans and specifications for the Madison section and the Keansburg section. Design for the Matawan section is complete. Entire project construction about 93 percent complete. Madison Township construction was completed on October 27, 1966, and accepted by the State of New Jersey for operation and maintenance on March 20, 1967. Operations and maintenance manual for Madison section completed and furnished to State of New Jersey. Construction of the shore work at Keansburg was completed on December 23, 1969 and accepted by State on February 5, 1970. Construction of Keansburg closure work completed on January 15, 1974. Additional items of improvement work incorporated into Keansburg closure work facilities. State accepted Keansburg closure work on June 6, 1974. Operation and maintenance manual for shore work and closure work at Keansburg completed. Planning continued for possible modification to closure structure. 34. SAW MILL RIVER AT ELMSFORD AND GREENBURGH, N.Y. Location. On the Saw Mill River in the town of Greenburgh, N.Y. One portion known as Babbitt Court lies along the river immediately south of the Village of Elmsford. The second portion of the project, known as the Elmsford-Greenburgh area, is north of the Village of Elmsford, separated from Babbitt court by approximately 4000 feet. (See U.S. Geological Survey Map, White Plains, N.Y. Existing project. In the Babbit Court area, the project provides for approximately 1,450 feet of levees and flood walls with associated ponding and interior drainage facilities. Within the Elmsford-Greenburgh area, the existing channel is to be widened and deepened for 2,450 feet with an additional 600 feet of channel modification on the tributary, Mine Brook. Levees and flood walls will be constructed on both banks of the Saw Mill River totalling approximately 4,500 feet and extending along Mine Brook to high ground. Ponding areas, a pumping station and other drainage structures will be provided. The total estimated Federal cost for the project is $5,010,000 exclusive of land, relocations and other work to be provided by local interests at an estimated cost of $1,420,000 (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must provide lands and rights-of-way for construction, including borrow, ponding, and waste disposal areas; hold the United States free from damages; maintain and operate completed works; provide all alterations, relocations, and necessary replacements of existing facilities, including bridges, highways, sewers, (including those storm sewers and drains required to convey interior drainage to improved channels or ponding areas) utilities, and railroad modifications and relocations other than bridges and bridge approaches; protect the channel and other flood works from future encroachment or obstruction, including waste disposal, which would reduce or otherwise impair their floodcarrying capacity, or provide a pumping station or additional gravity outlets, as appropriate, to compensate for any loss in ponding area effectiveness due to modification of or encroachment upon such areas; take appropriate measures to control development in partially protected areas and fringe areas not included in the project with a view toward preventing an undue increase in the flood damage potential; and at least annually, notify those affected that flooding will still be possible from large floods. New York State is the Local Cooperating Agency. The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, by letter dated June 12, 1974, indicated the State's intention to cooperate in the proposed plan. Operation and results during period. During Phase I preconstruction planning the authorized project was found to be no longer economically justified. Project reformulation to develop an alternative plan of improvement is continuing. Condition as of September 30. Plan of Study approved January 28, 1977. Preconstruction planning started in February 1977. Indications from Phase I planning accomplished to date, are that some features of the authorized project are no longer economically justified. Alternative flood control measures are being considered during reformulation. 35. SOUTH ELLENVILLE, N.Y. Location. In Ellenville, N.Y., on North Gully just above its confluence with Sandburg Creek, which discharges into Rondout Creek at Napanock, N.Y., about 2 miles downstream from Ellenville. (See U.S. Geological Survey, Ellenville quadrangle; Army Map Service, Ellenville quadrangle.) Existing project. Includes: a 2,300 foot concrete chute, a crib dam to prevent debris from entering chute; 380 feet of walls and a stilling basin; 823 feet of levees to protect against backwater from Sandburg Creek; a ponding area, drainage ditches and other interior drainage facilities. Physical model study to determine design of stilling basin required and authorized on August 28, 1970. Existing project, also known as "North Gully at Ellenville, N.Y.", is one of three physically and functionally independent projects included in Rondout Creek and Wallkill River, N.Y. and N.J. Survey Report. Estimated Federal cost for new work is $6,680,000 (October 1981), exclusive of lands, relocations and other work to be provided by local interests at an estimated cost of $640,000. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must, prior to construction, give assurances they will furnish all lands, easements, and rights-of-way necessary for construction of improvements; perform all alteration of highways, highway bridges, utility and related facilities made necessary for construction of project; hold the United States free from damages; protect channels, ponding areas and other flood works from future encroachment or obstruction that would reduce their flood carrying capacity and control development of fringe areas not protected by proposed improvement with a view to preventing an undue increase in 2-19 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 flood damage potential; and maintain and operate completed works. Agency responsible for local cooperation is State of New York. The Commissioner, New York State Department of Conservation (now Department of Environmental Conservation) executed assurances of local cooperation on March 5, 1968 which was accepted by the District Engineer for the United States on March 25, 1968. To comply with Section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (PL91-611), the preparation of an agreement of Local Cooperation is being initiated to replace the signed assurance. Implementation of project dependent upon N.Y. State's decision on proposed relocation of Route 52 located within project area. Operations and results during period. Continued coordination with the State of New York. Condition as of September 30. Preconstruction planning was started in January 1967. Model study completed in January 1972 and final report from Waterways Experiment Station received on May 4, 1974. General Design Memorandum submitted and returned for revisions. Environmental Impact Statement submitted to Council on Environmental Quality on July 27, 1971. Completion of engineering and design and construction remain. 36. SOUTH ORANGE, N.J. Location. Village of South Orange, N.J., about 3.5 miles upstream from junction of East and West Branches of Rahway River. It is in northeastern New Jersey and lies within metropolitan area of Greater New York. (See N.J. Department of Conservation and Economic Development quadrangles and Army Map Service quadrangle sheets for South Orange, N.J.) Existing project. Provides for clearing and excavating the East Branch (7,217 feet); constructing 300 feet of floodwalls, 690 feet of levees, 3,324 feet of concrete flume; reconstructing five bridges; raising roads; providing interior drainage work, and miscellaneous utility changes. Estimated Federal cost for new work is $5,158,000 exclusive of land and other work to be provided by local interests at an estimated cost of $1,780,000. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. It was necessary, under project authorization, for local interests to provide lands, easements and rights-of-way for construction; hold the United States free from damages; maintain and operate completed works; make necessary changes to highways, highway bridges and approaches, utilities, and miscellaneous existing improvements; protect channels and other flood control works from future encroachment or obstruction that would reduce their flood-carrying capacity; and control development of the fringe areas not protected by the proposed improvement with a view to preventing an undue increase in the flood damage potential. The Village of South Orange, New Jersey is the Local Cooperation Agency. Signed assurance of Local Cooperation was received from the Village on August 15, 1969 and accepted by the District Engineer on August 25, 1969. First supplemental assurance covering items of local work accepted July 6, 1970. Authority granted to accept contributed other funds for Village (December 1969 and January 1970) and in June 1971 for Essex County, Orange and East Orange. On June 1, 1970, and November 4, 1970, $40,000 and $41,000 respectively were received from the Village for non-Federal design. During Fiscal Year 1972 the following funds were received. $19,000 from the City of Orange, $395,000 from the County of Essex, and $57,000 from the City of East Orange. During Fiscal Year 1973, $105,000 was received from the County of Essex. Operations and results during period. Closeout of non- Federal remaining funds was initiated. Condition as of September 30. Engineering and design was started in March 1967 and subsequently completed. Submitted General Design Memorandum and Post Authorization Letter (June 5, 1970). Final plans and specifications completed. Environmental Impact Statement submitted to Council on Environmental Quality on March 31, 1971. Awarded construction contract for Federal work and options for non-Federal work. Project construction completed in July 1976. Financial closeout of non-Federal funds remains. 37. STATEN ISLAND, N.Y. Location. About 13 miles of coast along southern and eastern coast of Staten Island (a New York City borough) from Ft. Wadsworth at the Narrows to Tottenville at the mouth of Arthur Kill along Lower New York and Raritan Bays. (See National Ocean and Atmospheric Administra- , tion Charts and Geological Survey maps for New York and vicinity, Staten Island and Sandy Hook Bay area.) Existing project. Provides shore and hurricane protection between Graham and Oakwood Beaches and at Tottenville Beach; shore protection at Great Kills Park and between Arbutus Lake and Sequine Point. Improvement includes 2.6 miles of beach fill and dunes at Tottenville Beach and between Graham and Oakwood Beaches; 2.2 miles of beach fill only at Great Kills Park and between Arbutus Lake and Sequine Point; 2.9 miles of levees at Tottenville Beach, Graham Beach and between Oakwood Beach and Great Kills Park; two groins at Tottenville Beach and Sequine Point; interior drainage facilities including four pumping stations between Graham and Oakwood Beaches; and relocations. ENGCW-EZ April 7, 1970 5th Indorsement to NANEN-Br September 30, 1969 letter submitting Feasibility Study authorized continuing Design Memorandum to incorporate extension from Graham Beach to Ft. Wadsworth. Total estimated Federal Cost is $21,500,000 (October 1977) which includes participation in periodic beach nourishment for 10 years at $112,000 annually. Total estimated non-Federal cost for all requirements of local cooperation is $11,200,000 including $8,470,000 cash contribution, $1,520,000 for lands and relocation, $1,210,000 estimated annual beach nourishment cost for a 10-year period, and excludes annual nourishment costs thereafter and annual maintenance and replacement costs. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must provide lands and rights-of-way for construction; alter and relocate buildings, streets, storm drains, utilities and other structures; bear 34 percent of total first cost, estimated at $11,200,000, to consist of the two items listed above and a cash contribution now estimated at $8,470,000 which excludes $1,210,000 for 10-year nourishment, or, if any section is undertaken separately the apportionment of first 2-20 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT cost will be as shown in District Engineer's report, with due regard to change in public ownership and other changes before construction, provided that cash contribution be paid either in a lump sum before starting entire project, or in installments before starting pertinent items, final apportionment of cost to be made after actual costs and values have been determined; hold the United States free from damages; maintain completed works and provide periodic nourishment during economic life of the shore protection works subject to Federal participation in cost of periodic nourishment for an initial period of 10 years, non-Federal share of such costs for the 10-year period is presently estimated at 31 percent for Graham Beach to Oakwood Beach reach, 33 percent for Tottenville Beach reach, 30 percent for Great Kills Park reach, and 62 percent for Arbutus Lake to Sequine Point reach; maintain during economic life of project continued public ownership and administration of public use of non-Federal publicly owned shore upon which recommended Federal participation is based; adopt appropriate ordinances to provide for preservation of dunes; and control water pollution to safeguard the health of bathers. If local interests elect to incorporate features in highway or other developments in the waterfront area which serve the purpose of hurricane protection, United States shall participate in cost of such features on a basis such that overall Federal cost for hurricane protection shall not be greater than that which would apply in the absence of such features, and such that any resultant savings in overall cost of combined features shall be shared equitably between the United States and local interests on the basis of cost allocation and cost apportionment approved by the Chief of Engineers, provided that such participation in the combined features shall be subject to the undertaking of any necessary remaining hurricane protection works by the United States. New York State Department of Public Works in letter dated December 1965 stated it was prepared to execute assurances when plans are in final form. General Design Memorandum No. 1, Ford Wadsworth to Great Kills Park, Ft. Wadsworth to Arthur Kill project Staten Island, New York submitted for review on June 30, 1976. Based on review of General Design Memorandum No. 1, additional engineering studies will be required subject to reconfirmation of New York State's intent to provide local cooperation required. In July 6, 1977 letter, New York State requested to reconfirm their intent to provide items of local cooperation for the project in light of New York City's fiscal condition. On October 30, 1977, State of New York requested that reconfirmation of local cooperation be deferred one year. No answer has been received to date and the project has therefore been placed in a deferred status. Operations and results during period. None. Condition as of September 30. Preconstruction planning was started in January, 1966 and is about 99 percent complete. Feasibility Study of project extension from Graham Beach to Fort Wadsworth was authorized November 16, 1967 and is complete. Coordination was initiated with the National Parks Services in connection with the Gateway National Recreation Area. In April 1974 local interests submitted their formal intent to support the modified plan. Draft Environmental Impact Statement furnished to Council on Environmental Quality on March 23, 1976. Public meeting on General Design Memorandum design plans for Ft. Wadsworth to Great Kills Park portion of project held on April 22, 1976. Final General Design Memorandum continued. By June 21, 1976 letter the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation advised of the local desire for the concrete floodwall plan and their intent to support this plan. On October 30, 1977, State of New York requested that reconfirmation of local cooperation be deferred one year. Project was placed in a deferred status on January 31, 1978. Additional engineering studies and Post Authorization Change Report required on General Design Memorandum No. 1 when and if local cooperation reconfirmed by New York State. 38. YONKERS, N.Y. Location. On Sawmill River in Yonkers, N.Y., about 1 mile upstream from junction of Sawmill and Hudson Rivers. (See Geological Survey, Yonkers quadrangle.) Existing project. Project provides for: constructing a 20-foot wide concrete channel extending 3,781 feet along most congested reach of the channel; improving channel in other reaches (5,689 feet); constructing floodwalls (5,370 feet), one closure structure, closure levee, various interior drainage facilities; reconstructing or raising of nine bridges, and miscellaneous utility changes. Estimated Federal cost for new work is $12,530,000 exclusive of land, relocations and other work to be provided by local interests at an estimated cost of $2,550,000. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must provide lands and rights-of-way for construction, including borrow, ponding, and waste disposal areas; hold the United States free from damages; maintain and operate completed works; provide all alterations, relocations, and necessary replacements of existing facilities, including bridges, highways, sewers, including those storm sewers and drains required to convey interior drainage to improved channels or ponding areas, utilities, and railroad modifications and relocations other than bridges and bridge approaches; protect the channel and other flood works from future encroachment or obstruction, including waste disposal, which would reduce or otherwise impair their floodcarrying capacity, or provide a pumping station or additional gravity outlets, as appropriate, to compensate for any loss in ponding area effectiveness due to modification of or encroachment upon such areas; take appropriate measures to control development in partially protected areas and fringe areas not included in the project with a view toward preventing an undue increase in the flood damage potential; and at least annually, notify those affected that flooding will still be possible from large floods. New York State is the Local Cooperating Agency. An agreement of Local Cooperation was signed by the Commissioner of the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation on April 9, 1974, and signed by the New York District Engineer on April 30, 1974 for the United States and approved by the Secretary of the Army on May 17, 1974. The City of Yonkers, through the State, furnished $93,000 (contributed, funds "other") for non- Federal design costs. Operations and results during period. Construction of Contract No. 2, continued. Condition as of September 30. Started preconstruction planning December 1970. Phase I General Design 2-21 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 Memorandum completed on October 1, 1973 and approved on April 19, 1974. Phase II General Design Memorandum completed and approved June 1, 1976. Agreement of Local Cooperation executed with New York State. Final Environmental Impact Statement and supplement in Federal Register on May 13, 1974, and August 13, 1976 respectively. Addendum filed with Council on Environmental Quality on August 25, 1976. Initial plans and specifications for Contract No. 1 completed and construction contract for this increment awarded August 30, 1974. Construction of Contract No. 1 completed. Construction for remaining increment of project (Contract No. 2) With completion scheduled in 1982. 39. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspections of completed flood control works are performed semi-annually to determine the extent of compliance by local interests with the requirements of operation and maintenance. 40. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 2-I at end of chapter.) 41. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood Control Activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress as amended (Preauthorization) Cost for preauthorization studies to complete reconnaissance reports were: $3,900 on Belcher's Creek, W. Milford, N.J.; $1,900 on Canoe Brook, Livingston, N.J.; $2,300 on Ramapo River, Monroe, N.Y.; $2,100 on Esopus Creek, Ulster, N.Y. Cost to start Detailed Project Reports were: $5,094 on Sheldon Brook, Tarrytown, N.Y.; $5,000 on Canoe Brook, Livingston, N.J.; $4,874 on Esopus Creek, Ulster, N.Y.; $774 on Belcher's Creek, W. Milford, N.J.; $105,574 on Peckman River, Little Falls, N.J.; $100,208 on Schoharie Creek, Schoharie, N.Y.; $57,991 on Sauquoit Creek, Whitesboro, N.Y. Cost to continue Detailed Project Reports were: $18,915 on Barney Brook, N.J.; $42,302 on Missisquoi River, Vt.; $25,591 on Nannyhagen Brook, N.Y.; $12,578 on Patroon Creek, Albany, N.Y.; and $30,550 on Yonkers, Nepera Park, N.Y. Cost to complete Detailed Project Reports were: $1,601 on Branch Brook, Mt. Kisco, N.Y.; A contract for construction of the Chappaqua (Saw Mill River) Flood Control Project was awarded on June 9, 1980 for $1,513,775. Construction continued through Fiscal Year 1981. Costs for FY 1981 was $1,393,413. Cost to continue plans and specification on Pine Brook Manalapan, N.J. was $1,328. Natural Disaster and Emergency Flood Control Activities-- advance preparation, emergency operations, rehabilitation, emergency drinking water and advance measures (Public Law 84-99 and antecedent legislation). Under "Advance Preparation," the New York District completed revisions of various emergency manuals, attended meetings and seminars dealing with emergency preparation and response, provided technical assistance to requesting localities and conducted field inspections to determine the eligibility of damaged facilities, structures, etc. for assistance under the provisions of Public Law 84-99. Under "Emergency Operations," the New York District Emergency Operations Center provided one individual from October 22-25, 1980 to the Mount Saint Helens disaster relief operation. Technical assistance was also provided to the towns of Jay, N.Y., Whitesboro, N.Y., and Thurman, N.Y.; The village of Hardwick, VT. and Essex County, N.Y., for ice jam prevention. During FY 1981 approximately 95,000 sand bags were distributed to local and county agencies. The flash flood of March 21-22, 1980 caused damages to flood facilities at the Federal Flood Control Projects at North Ellenville, N.Y., Mt. Tremper, N.Y. and Mt. Pleasant, N.Y. "Rehabilitation" of the damage at these projects were completed at a cost bf: $145,000 North Ellenville, N.Y.; $119,400 Mount Pleasant, N.Y.; and $70,200 Mount Tremper, N.Y. Under "Advance Measures" Provision of Public Law 84-99 (Code 910-500) The New York District was granted authority and funds to fill a breach in the barrier island in the vincinty of Moriches Inlet, Suffolk County, New York. To accomplish this emergency work a contract was let on September 19, 1980 for the placement of 1.2 million cubic yards of sand. The total cost of this contract is $11,300,000, of this amount, $9,820,000 will be Federal funds while the remainder will be funded by the State of New York. In response to a request from the Federal Emergency Management Agency, on September 7, 1980, the New York District conducted an engineering survey and made a technical analysis and evaluation of the drought problems in Northern New Jersey. Engineering consultation and assistance has been provided throughout FY 1981 on this problem. All activities in connection with Federal Disaster Assistance Administration Declaration Numbers 477-New Jersey (July 23, 1975); 487-New York (October 2, 1975); 515-New York (July 21, 1976); 519-New Jersey (August 21, 1976) and 520-New York (September 3, 1976) have been completed. Remaining funds in each account have been returned to the appropriate Federal agency (Federal Emergency Management Agency). New Jersey Flood (FDAA 477): Status as of September 30, 1980. Federal Disaster Declaration Date: July 23, 1975. Mission completed June 30, 1979. New York Flood (FDAA 487): Status as of September 30, 1980. Federal Disaster Declaration Date: October 2, 1975. Mission completed June 30, 1979. New York Flood (FDAA 515): Status as of September 30, 1980. Federal Disaster Declaration Date: July 21, 1976. Mission completed June 30, 1979. New Jersey Flood (FDAA 519): Status as of September 30, 1980. Federal Disaster Declaration Date: August 21, 1976. 2-22 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT Mission completed June 30, 1979. New York Flood (FDAA 520): Status as of September 30, 1980. Federal Disaster Declaration Date: September 3, 1976. Mission completed June 30, 1979. 42. EMERGENCY STREAMBANK AND SHORELINE PROTECTION Activities pursuant to Section 14, Public Law 526, 79th Congress as amended (Preauthorization) Cost for preauthorization studies to start Reconnaissance Reports were: $6,000 on Esopus Creek, Shandaken, N.Y.; $1,000 on Kaaterskill Creek, Palenville, N.Y.; $1,000 on Schoharie Creek, Jewett, N.Y. Costs to continue Reconnaissance Report was: $3,400 on Zimmerman Creek, Village of St. Johnsville, N.Y. Cost to complete Reconnaissance Reports were: $3,500 on Sandburg Creek, Ellenville, N.Y.; $2,900 on Hoosick River, Hoosick Falls, N.Y.; $2,500 on Hudson River, Troy, N.Y.; $2,000 on Hudson River, Staatsburg, N.Y. Costs to start Detailed Project Report was: $3,252 on unamed Tributary to Hudson River at Coxsackie, N.Y. Cost to complete Plans and Specifications on Ho-Ho-Kus Brook, Waldwick, N.J. was $10,432. 43. DEBRIS REMOVAL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Activities pursuant to Section 202, Public Law 587, 94th Congress as amended (Preauthorization) The authorization for this work expired in FY 1979. 44. SURVEYS (See Table 2-J at end of chapter.) 45. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Costs for the period of $194,339 for flood plain management services are set forth in Table 2-L at the end of chapter. (See also Table 2-K on completed flood plain studies.) 46. DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS A total of 10 projects were deauthorized by Congressional Action on June 9, 1981 pursuant to Section 12 of Public Law 93-251, Water Resources Development Act of 1976. (See Table 2-M at end of chapter.) 2-23 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Projects Funding 1. Aquatic Plant New Work Control Approp. Cost 2. Bronx River, N.Y. New Worl Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 3. East River, N.Y. New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 4. East Rockaway, N.Y. New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 5. Glen Cove Creek, N.Y. New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 6. Hudson River, N.Y. New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 7. Jamaica Bay, N.Y. New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 8. Jones Inlet, N.Y. New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 9. Mamaroneck Harbor, New Work N.Y. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost (Other New Work Contributed Funds) Contrib. Cost 10. Mattituck Harbor, N.Y. New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 11 Moriches Inlet, N.Y. New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost (Required New Work Contributed Funds) Contrib. Cost FY 78 5,000 6,438 268,948 268,948 4,000 7,090 287,840 286,249 883,465 883,437 106,000 103,862 FY 79 45,000 10,741 523,000 223,000 15,000 7,661 5,000 5,733 2,094,400 1,371,089 609,000 609,000 876,000 873,938 13,000 7,852 230,000 168,177 FY 80 45,000 23,198 932,000 876,038 60,000 29,865 657,000 957,000 7,339 1,151 867,000 1,579,814 173,000 160,641 1,726,700 1,721,005 20,000 15,692 225,000 228,526 25,000 62,948 --- - 3,390,000 - 3,390,000 ------- 2-24 TABLE 2-A -- FY 81 74,000 61,635 -113,000 - 57,038 1,481,000 1,511,135 - 420,000 29,365 10,600 10,600 21,219 21,219 -31,390 2,451 656,400 661,987 1,000,000 1,012,359 284,400 292,184 243,000 247,308 23,000 23,000 1,621 100,000 47,534 Total Cost to September 30, 1981 429,806 345,497 1,149,94625 1,149,9462 1,947,85325 1,947,85325 32,750,745 32,723,662 3,012,76922.23 3,012,769222: 83,969" 533,3344 4,064,502 4,064,501 29,7605 29,7605 126,820 126,820 44,249,8035.6 44,249,8475,6 23,825,15978 23,721,1507,8 4,545,753 4,545,753 2,604,5479 2,604,5479 1,822,53010 1,822,53010 8,014,210 8,014,209 339,720 339,720 551,677 551,677 174,044 174,044 177,92511 177,925" 963,084 935,786 931,000 849,949 9,422 9,422 3,390,000 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT TABLE 2-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Projects Funding 12. Narrows of Lake New Work Champlain, N.Y. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 13. New York and New New Work Jersey Channels Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost 14. New York Harbor- New Work Collection and Approp. Removal of Drift Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. & Oper. Approp. Cost (Required Contributed New Work Funds) Approp. Cost 15. New York Harbor- New Work Entrance Channels Approp. and Anchorage Cost Areas Maint. Approp. Cost 16. Raritan River, N.J. New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 17. Shark River, N.J. New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost (Other Contributed New Work Funds) Approp. Cost 18. Shooters Island, N.Y. New Work Approp. Cost 19. Westchester Creek, New Work N.Y. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 20. Supervisor of New Maint. York F.- '1r Approp. Cost 24. East RoL;.away Inlet New Work to Rockaway Inlet Approp. and Jamaica Bay, Cost N.Y. (Part I) (Required New Work Contributed Funds) Contrib. Cost 20,000 20,000 1,104,842 1,104,842 1,470,000 2,141,628 3,720,224 3,957,772 20,000 20,000 493,250 493,250 1,700,000 1,684,529 4,808,550 4,809,503 894,400 1,0 935,236 6 - -2 -103,646 27,933 22,933 656,000 656,595 - 905,000 - 237,201 - 77,536 65,128 59,227 02n 23,000 23,000 24,400 24,400 140,500 2,617,600 140,500 2,616,513 1,4( 7( 2,0' 2,0 4: 2( & 618 8,644 - 1,654,726 - 2,288,438 - 89,000 - 89,000 100,000 98,000 00,000 584,000 64,038 1,251,792 01,000 2,195,700 26,586 2,215,037 - 2,752,200 - 2,752,459 20,000 333,000 65,867 93,429 9,626 5,000 100,000 98,362 437,500 2,895 75 6,981 1,003,200 1,002,417 - 420,000 29,365 6,000 647 - 1,284,000 - 1,277,019 804,200 882,000 804,200 881,233 300,000 1,250,000 76,509 948,577 30,000 58,093 751,752 861,766 2-25 Total Cost to FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 September 30, 1981 681,81112 681,81112 839,69513.14 839,67413.14 73,052,4351 16.1 73,052,43515 161 25,132,359'1 25,495,74818 454,773 454,773 8,929,000 8,510,765 37,757,89619 38,023,83919 3,750,01319 3,750,27219 3,619,801 2,896,818 45,009,71020 45,008,74020 19,143,824 18,904,761 1,551,47028.29 1, 551,47028.29 10,113,70380 10,113,90321 150,000 150,000 575,404 573,766 437,500 2,895 100,000 98,722 175,93326 175,93326 2,921,31127 2,921,31127 25,426,447 25,425,105 8,950,356 8,849,538 11,220,001 8,712,843 SSeeection REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 2-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Projects 25. Fire Island Inlet, to Jones Inlet, N.Y. (Required Contributed Funds) 28. Ardsley, N.Y. 29. Elizabeth, N.J. (Other Contributed Funds) 30. Fire Island Inlet to Montauk Point, N.Y. (Federal Funds) (Required Contributed Funds) 31. Liberty State Park Levee & Seawall, N.J. 32. Passaic River Basin, N.J. & N.Y. Phase I 33. Raritan Bay & Sandy Hook Bay, N.J. (Regular Funds) (Required Contributed Funds) 34. Sawmill River, Elmsford-Greenburg, N.Y. 35. South Ellenville, N.Y. 36. South Orange, N.J. (Regular Funds) (Other Contributed Funds) 37. Staten Island, N.Y. 38. Yonkers, N.Y. (Other Contributed Funds) Total Cost to Funding FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 September 30, 1981 New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 65,000 65,000 100,000 77,847 6,700,000 8,032,798 287,000 283,212 - 14,000 3,699 2,307,000 2,278,837 4,004 1,650,000 701,359 45,000 61,063 1,000 60,000 42,301 1,040,000 1,006,417 3,015 1,087 119,000 114,663 1,330 - 25,000 8,112 2,100,000 1,152,649 375,000 9,340 3,. 2,800,000 2,722,981 66,000 23,614 2,226,592 1,807,377 100,000 83,684 5,810,000 5,345,348 416,444 721,605 600,000 627,312 42,539 62,043 26,441 2,506,700 2,507,415 2,417 6,353 000 71,000 366 87,849 - 10,000 43 1,840 - 70,000 116 12,573 98,910 98,910 3,184 2,500,000 2,610,334 90,189 2,272 2,200,000 2,409,616 61,200 81,453 2-26 125,000 110,987 100,000 88,736 3,614,000 3,792,146 266,834 482,853 1,500,000 1,478,528 78,000 87,078 2,700,000 2,645,950 867 48,376 3,357 2,552,000 2,114,363 156,081 11,958,767 11,958,768 274,298 217,899 6,355,900 6,085,899 300,000 250,267 27,843,800 27,479,774 1,012,578 1,516,992 7,041,438 7,022,050 13,97324 13,97324 4,012,930 3,650,186 186,043 159,519 8,553,700; 8,438,619 7,792,800 7,783,531 262 262 3,291,384 3,277,725 490,000 476,762 289,700 282,965 5,088,900 5,088,900 1,878,910 1,768,584 695,000 691,313 12,529,900 11,306,925 529,200 430,063 200,( 126, NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT TABLE 2-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 1. Of which $12,500 is for North Atlantic Division accounts. 2. Of which $12,127 is for North Atlantic Division accounts. 3. Includes $1,040,000 for new work and $1,040,000 expended for the portion under construction general. 4. Excludes $100,000 for new work expended from contributed funds and includes $82,600 for new work expended from public works funds. 5. Deferred. 6. Includes $5,112,594 for new work for previous project. 7. Includes $238,350 for new work expended from public works funds and $31,461 emergency relief funds. Excludes $81,373 expended from contributed funds, other. 8. Excludes $454,273 expended between August 18, 1915 and June 30, 1935, for operation and care of lock and dam at Troy, N.Y., under permanent indefinite appropriation. Excludes $23,735 reimbursement for repairs to Troy Lock. 9. Includes $2,961 for maintenance for previous projects. 10. Excludes $1,822,530 for new work expended from contributed funds. 11. Excludes $34,580 for new work expended from contributed funds. 12. Includes $115,000 for new work for previous projects. 13. Includes $19,140 for maintenance for previous projects. 14. Includes $31,166 for U.S. Lake Survey Revisory and Inshore Sounding Program. 15. Includes $12,809,975 for new work for previous projects, and $6,621 for new work for Lemon Creek, Staten Island, N.Y. 16. Excludes $7,712 for new work expended from contributed funds. 17. Includes $807,000 for new work expended from public works funds and $2,023,308 for new work expended from emergency relief funds. 18. Includes $1,160,380 for maintenance for previous project, and $1,621 for maintenance for Lemon Creek, Staten Island, N.Y. 19. Includes $2,491,206 expended to date for construction of a land-based overfire air pit incinerator ($1,493,393 in maintenance funds and $997,813 in O&M funds.) 20. Includes $116,530 applied to removing wrecks authorized by acts prior to adoption of existing project. 21. Includes $673,155 for new work for previous project. 22. Includes $6,187,694 for new work for previous projects. 23. Includes $37,664 for maintenance for previous projects. 24. For pilot program to improve coastal storm warnings. 25. Includes $69,036 for new work and $26,921 for maintenance for previous projects. Excludes $10,000 for new work expended from contributed funds. 26. Includes $77,182 for new work for previous projects. 27. Includes $66,000 for maintenance for previous projects. 28. Includes $673,155 for new work for previous project. 29. Excludes $292,685 for new work expended from Ordinance funds and $66,000 for new work expended from contributed funds. 30. Includes $111,419 for maintenance for previous projects. 2-27 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents River and Harbor Act of 1958 Section 104 River and Harbor Act of 1958 Section 302 River and Harbor Act of 1965 Mar. 4, 1913 Mar. 2, 1915' July 27, 1916 Aug. 8, 1917 Do. July 18, 1918 Sept. 22, 1922 E. Pub. Wks. Comm. Res., Dec. 15, 1970 and S. Pub. Wks Comm. Res. Dec. 17, 19708 July 3, 1930 March 3, 1925 June 25, 1910 Mar. 3, 1925 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 19354 June 20, 1938 Sept. 3, 1954 P.L. 89-72 AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (See Section 1 of Text) Control and Progressive eradication of obnoxious Aquatic Plant growths. Provided that all research and Planning cost to be borne fully by the United States. Modified project to include control of waterchestnut. BRONX RIVER, N.Y. (See Section 2 of Text) Channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide from East River to Dam at East 177th Street. EAST RIVER, N.Y. (See Section 3 of Text) Removal of Coenties Reef to 35 feet, conditioned upon local interests increasing depth to 40 feet. Channel across Diamond Reef 35 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide. Channel east of Blackwells Island to 20 feet; channel between South Brother and Berrian Islands, to 20 feet; channel between North and South Brother Islands to 26 feet. Channel 40 feet deep through East River and Hell Gate. Secure a depth of 40 feet in channel through East River and Hell Gate as soon as practicable. Depth limited to 35 feet in through channel between Wallabout Channel and Throgs Neck, Channel east of Blackwells Island, 30 feet to English P1. and eliminated 20-foot channel north of English P1. Eliminated channel between North and South Brother Islands except as authorized prior to existing project. Remove certain rocks and reefs and construct dike in pot cove, Hell Gate. Spur channel to Astoria waterfront 37 feet in rock, 35 feet in other material, for a length of 0.95 mile for varying widths, and a turning basin. (South Brother Island Channel). EAST ROCKAWAY INLET, N.Y. (See Section 4 of Text) Channel 12 feet deep and 250 feet wide, and a jetty. GLEN COVE CREEK, N.Y. (See Section 5 of Text) Channel 8 feet deep and 100 feet wide. HUDSON RIVER, N.Y. (See Section 6 of Text) Channel 12 feet deep from Hudson to Waterford, remove State lock and dam at Troy and construct a new lock and dam.2 Channel 27 feet deep from Hudson to Albany, N.Y. Channel 27 feet deep below Hudson. Operation and care of lock and dam at Troy were included in project July 1, 1935. Relocation of 12-foot channel between Troy and Waterford. Deepen channel between Albany and Waterford to 14 feet with no change in depths for harbors in front of Albany and Troy. Deepen channel between New York City and Albany to 32 feet and construct a turning basin and 2 anchorages. Mooring facilities. H. Doc 37 85th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 897, 62d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 188, 63d Cong., 1st sess. Do. Do. H. Doc. 140, 65th Cong., 1st sess. Specified in act. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 3, 67th Cong., 2d sess.' S. Doc. 91-60, 91st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 19, 71st Cong., 1st sess.' H. Doc. 207, 68th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 719, 61st Cong., 2d sess.' H. Doc. 350, 68th Cong., 1st sess.' H. Doc. 210, 70th Cong., 1st sess.' S Doc. 155, 72d Cong., 2d sess.' H. Doc. 572, 75th Cong., 3d sess. H. Doc. 228, 83d Cong., 1st sess.' 2-28 TABLE 2-B NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT TABLE 2-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents June 25, 1910 March 2, 1945 May 17, 1950 Mar. 2, 1945 Sept. 22, 1922 Aug. 20, 1935 July 14, 1960 June 3, 1896 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 11, 1964 July 14, 1960 Aug. 8, 1917 Sept. 6, 19336 Aug. 30, 1935 May 28, 19356 May 17, 1950 Oct. 27, 1965 Mar. 4, 1915 Aug. 8, 1917 July 3, 1930 Dec. 31, 1970 JAMAICA BAY, N.Y. (See Section 7 of Text) Construction of 1 jetty Interior channel along west shore of bay, 18 and 12 feet deep; interior channel along south shore, 15 feet deep; entrance channel 20 and 18 feet deep; and 1 riprap jetty all in lieu of work heretofore authorized. Modified conditions of local cooperation. Channel 15 feet deep in Mott Basin including its 2 branches. JONES INLET, N.Y. (See Section 8 of Text) Construction of jetty and channel 12 feet deep and 250 feet wide. MAMARONECK HARBOR, N.Y. (See Section 9 of Text) Dredging 10-foot channel and anchorage. Dredging 6-foot anchorage in West Basin and its approach channel. Dredging 6-foot anchorage in East Basin. MATTITUCK HARBOR, N.Y. (See Section 10 of Text) Dredging 7 foot channel and 2 riprap jetties. 250-foot extension of west jetty. Dredging anchorage area and deepening channel at upper end. MORICHES INLET, N.Y. (See Section 11 of Text) Channel 10 feet deep and 200 feet wide. NARROWS OF LAKE CHAMPLAIN, N.Y. AND VERMONT (See Section 12 of Text) Channel 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide. NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY CHANNELS (See Section 13 of Text) Anchorage off Perth Amboy to 35 feet. Channel 35 feet deep from lower bay to upper bay, except between vicinity of Smith Creek and vicinity of Piles Creek to 30 feet with anchorage 38 feet deep at Sandy Hook and Perth Amboy. Channel 35 feet deep from vicinity of Smith Creek to vicinity of Piles Creek. Widen entrance to Kill Van Kull to 1,400 feet narrowing to a minimum width of 1,000 feet. NEW YORK HARBOR, COLLECTION AND REMOVAL OF DRIFT (See Section 14 of Text) Allotment from appropriations made for New York Harbor and its immediate tributaries may be used for collection and removal of drift in these waterways. Carrying on this work as a separate and distinct project. Increase scope of project to include removal and disposal of derelict vessels, some deteriorated shore structures and debris along shores; and the repair of other shore structures; all subject to approval by Secretary of the Army and the President. 2-29 H. Doc. 1488, 60th Cong. 2d sess. H. Doc. 700, 76th Cong., 3d sess. H. Doc. 665, 80th Cong., 2d sess. (Contains latest published map). H. Doc. 409. 77th Cong. H. Doc. 651, 66th Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 4, 74th Cong., 1st sess.' H. Doc. 209, 86th Cong., 2d sess.' 'Contains latest published maps. Annual Report 1891, p 843. H. Doc. 8, 71st Cong., 1st sess.' Chief of Engineers pursuant to Sec. 107, Public Law 86-645. H. Doc. 126, 86th Cong., 1st sess.' H. Doc. 1387, 62nd Cong., 3d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 17, 71st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 133, 74th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 233, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 108, 89th Cong., 1st sess. P.L. 91-611, 91st Cong., H.R. 19877. REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 2-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 7, 1974 July 5, 1884 Mar. 3, 1899 June 25, 1910 Aug. 8, 1917 Aug. 8, 1917 Aug. 8, 1917 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 July 3, 1958 Oct. 27, 1965 Mar. 2, 1919 Jul. 3, 1930 Jul. 3, 1930 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 26, 1937 Oct. 17, 1940 Oct. 23, 1962 Mar. 2, 1945 Water Resources Development Act 1976, P.L. 94-587 Removal and disposal of derelict vessels, some deteriorated shore structures and debris along shores and the repair of other shore structures. NEW YORK HARBOR-ENTRANCE CHANNELS AND ANCHORAGE AREAS (See Section 15 of Text) Main-Ship-Bayside-Gedney to 30 feet for width of 1,000 feet (dimensions fixed by Secretary of War, Dec. 27, 1886, by authority of act of Aug. 5, 1886). Ambrose Channel (East Channel) to 40 feet. Maintenance of entrance channel under 1 head. Anchorage Channel, extension of Ambrose Channel into Upper Bay. Removal of Craven Shoal. Channel between Staten Island and Hoffman and Swinburne Islands. Relocation of southerly section of Anchorage Channel. Dredging south end of Red Hook Flats, Liberty Island Anchorage, and channel along New Jersey pierhead line. Deepen Bayside-Gedney Channel to 35 feet for a width of 800 feet. Deepen Ambrose and Anchorage Channels to 45 feet for a width of 2,000 feet. Dredging South Channel. Elimination of portion of Bayside-Gedney Channel. Deepen and expand Red Hook Flats Anchorage. Deepen Gravesend Bay Anchorage. RARITAN RIVER, N.J. (See Section 16 of Text) Channel 15 feet deep and 200 feet wide to Washington Canal, thence 10 feet deep and 150 feet wide to canal locks and 10 feet deep thru South Channel.7 Channel 25 feet deep and 300 feet wide up to New York and Long Branch Railroad bridge. Channel 10 feet deep in earth and 11 feet in rock to New Brunswick. Width reduced to 100 feet. Relocation of lower reach of South Channel. Channel 25 feet deep and 300 feet wide to junction of main and south channels, thence of same depth on South Channel to Titanium Pigment Co. Channel 25 feet deep and 300 feet wide from junction of main and south channels to government wharf, including a turning basin. In South Channel, maintenance of 15-foot channel to dock of Middlesex County Sewerage Authority. SHARK RIVER, N.J. (See Section 17 of Text) Channel 18 feet deep, 150 feet wide across entrance bar, 12 feet deep 100 feet wide to Route 35 bridge, 8 feet deep 100 feet wide to upper limit of Belmar boat basin; and 12-foot anchorage. P.L. 93-251, 93rd Cong., H.R. 10203 Annual Reports 1887, p. 62 and 1888, p. 63 H. Doc. 159, 55th Cong., 3d sess. (Annual Report 1899, p. 1279). H. Doc. 518, 63d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 557, 64th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 625, 64th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 18, 71st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 183, 73d Cong., 2d sess.' H. Doc. 133, 74th Cong., 1st sess.' Senate Commerce Doc., 75th Cong., 1st sess.' S. Doc. 45, 84th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 17, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 1341, 62d Cong., 3d sess. H. Doc. 127, 70th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 454, 70th Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 31, 71st Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 74, 74th Cong., 2d sess. Report on file in the Office, Chief of Engineers (report not printed) H. Doc. 455, 86th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 102, 76th Cong., 1st sess.' SHOOTERS ISLAND, N.Y. & N.J. (See Section 18 of Text) Removal of the island within area defined by Federal channels north and south to a depth of 35 feet below mean low water. 2-30 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT TABLE 2-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Sept. 22, 1922 Sept. 3, 1954 1965 Flood Control Act 1974 Water Resources Development Act 1958 River and Harbor Act 1962 River and Harbor Act Section 201 Flood Control Act of 1965 1965 Flood Control Act 1960 River and Harbor Act 1974 Water Resources Development Act 1976 Water Resources Development Act 1976 Water Resources Development Act Section 101 (a) 1962 Flood Control Act 1965 Flood Control Act 1962 Flood Control Act WESTCHESTER CREEK, N.Y. (See Section 19 of Text) Channel 12 feet deep and two turning basins. Turning basin 250 by 250 feet in extent, 12 feet deep. EAST ROCKAWAY INLET TO ROCKAWAY INLET AND JAMAICA BAY, N.Y. (PART 1). (See Section 24 of Text) Hurricane barrier, dikes, levees, floodwalls, fill placement, stoplog structures, stairways, ramps, road raising, fishing platforms, annual nourishment. Authorized beach erosion control aspect to be constructed independent of the hurricane flood protection aspect of the project. FIRE ISLAND INLET TO JONES INLET, N.Y. (See Section 25 of Text) Three dredging operations with sand serving as nourishment to the beaches westerly of the inlet. Extension of existing jetty, a littoral reservoir, a navigation channel and dikes, sand deposit on westerly beaches. ARDSLEY, N.Y. (See Section 28 of Text) Channel improvement, concrete flume, flood walls, levees, various drainage structures. ELIZABETH, N.J. (See Section 29 of Text) Channel improvement, flume, levees, floodwalls, bridges, interior drainage facilities. FIRE ISLAND INLET TO MONTAUK POINT, N.Y. (See Section 30 of Text) Raising dunes, widening beaches, interior drainage structures, groins, beach replenishment, annual nourishment. Project modified to provide that non-Federal interest shall contribute 30 percent of the first costs. LIBERTY STATE PARK LEVEE AND SEAWALL, N.J. (See Section 31 of Text) Approximately 7,000 feet of seawall and elevated pedestrian walkway. PASSAIC RIVER BASIN, N.J. & N.Y. PHASE I (See Section 32 of Text) Advanced engineering and design study, involving reformulation of plans for flood control and water resource management. RARITAN BAY AND SANDY HOOK BAY, N.J. (See Section 33 of Text) Levees and floodwalls, interior drainage structures, groins, beachfill. SAW MILL RIVER at ELMSFORD and GREENBURGH, N.Y. (See Section 34 of Text) Levees, floodwalls, channel improvement. SOUTH ELLENVILLE, N.Y. (See Section 35 of Text) Levees, drainage ditches, walls, a concrete chute and a crib dam. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 8, 67th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 92, 82nd Cong., 1st sess.' H. Doc. 215, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 411, 84th Cong., 2d sess.1 H. Doc. 115, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 215/89/1. Doc. 249, 89th Cong. 1st sess. H. Doc. 425, 86th Cong., 2d sess. P.L. 93-251, 93rd Cong., H.R. 10203 H. Rpt 94-1702 H. Doc. 464, 87th Cong., 2d sess.' H. Doc. 94-465, 94th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 113, 87th Cong., 2d sess.' 2-31 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 2-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents 1965 Flood Control Act 1965 Flood Control Act 1965 Flood Control Act SOUTH ORANGE, N.J. (See Section 36 of Text) Levees and floodwalls, a concrete flume, raising roads drainage facilities, bridge reconstruction. STATEN ISLAND, N.Y. (See Section 37 of Text) Beachfill, groins, drainage facilities, four pumping stations. YONKERS, N.Y. (See Section 38 of Text) Channel improvement, concrete flume, flood walls, closure structure, various drainage facilities, reconstruct or raise nine bridges. S. Doc. 67, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 181, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 258, 89th Cong., 1st sess. 1. Contains latest published maps. 2. Widening to form harbors at Albany and Troy to 12 feet deep considered inactive. 3. Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act of June 26, 1934. 4. Public Works Administration, Sept. 6, 1933. 5. Public Works Administration. 6. Emergency Relief Act of 1935. 7. Public Resolution 67, 63d Congress, 3d session. 8. Authorized under Section 201 Flood Control Act 1965 (Public Law 89-298, 89th Congress, October 27, 1965). NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT HUDSON RIVER, N.Y. FEATURES OF LOCK AND DAM INCLUDED IN EXISTING PROJECT (See Section 6 of Text) Location: Below Waterford Above Battery, New York City Locks: Clear Width Greatest length available for full width Lift at lowest stages Depth on miter sills: Upper (at normal pool level) Lower (at lowest low water) Character of foundation: Rock Kind of dam: Fixed Crest Type of construction: Concrete Completed: 1917 Cost: $1,463,014 2.2 miles 153.8 miles 44.4 feet 492.5 feet 17.3 feet 16.3 feet 13.0 feet TOTAL COSTS FOR EXISTING PROJECT TO SEPTEMBER 30, 1981 See Section Operation of Text Project Funds New Work Rehabilitation Maintenance and Cost Total 6. Hudson River, Regular $38,560,839 - $850,833 $661,987 $40,073,709 N.Y. Public Works 238,350 - - - 238,350 Emergency Relief 311,461 - - - 311,461 TOTAL $39,110,650 - $850,833 $661,987 $40,623,520 13. N.Y. and N.J. Regular $57,412,152 $454,773 $2,616,513 - $60,483,438 Channels Public Works 807,000 - - - 807,000 Emergency Relief 2,023,308 - - - 2,023,308 Contributed 7,712 - - - 7,712 TOTAL $60,250,172 $454,773 $2,616,513 - $63,321,458 SUPERVISOR OF NEW YORK HARBOR (SEE SECTION 20 OF TEXT) STATEMENT OF ACTIVITIES-FY 1981 1. Number of Patrols a. Shore b. Vessel c. Air (helicopter) 2. Number of Inspections a. Shore Facilities b. Vessels 3. Number of Investigations a. Carry-over from FY 1980 b. Violations Reported FY 1981 4. Disposition of Cases a. After-the-fact Permit Applications Accepted b. Permit not required or already under permit c. Submitted for litigation to OCE or US Attorney d. Cases pending as of 1 October 81 Total Total Total 1,410 1,123 2,533 14,096 2,440 16,536 122 167 289 165 37 9 78 Total 289 2-33 TABLE 2-C TABLE 2-D TABLE 2-E ___ REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS FY 1981 Date Survey Conducted NEW JERSEY Edgewater-Weehawken, N.J., Hudson River Channel ................ Keyport Harbor, N.J. ....... ............. ............... Newark Bay, N.J.-Newark Bay, Hackensack & Passaic Rivers .............. New York and New Jersey Channels............. ............... New Jersey Pierhead Channel-New York & New Jersey Channels ........... Passaic River, N.J.; Newark Bay, Hackensack & Passaic Rivers............. Perth Amboy Anchorage, New York and New Jersey Channels ............. Sandy Hook Channel-New York Harbor................................ Shark River, N J ......... .......................................... NEW YORK Ambrose Channel-New York Harbor, N.Y........................ Bay Ridge Channel, N.Y......... .................................... Buttermilk Channel, New York Habor, N.Y. ........................... East River Spur Channel, N.Y........ ................................ East Rockaway Inlet, N.Y. .......................................... Flushing Bay and Creek, N.Y ........................................ Jam aica Bay, N .Y ..................................................... Jones Inlet, N .Y... .................................................... Kill Van Kull-New York and New Jersey Channels ......................... Lake Montauk Habor, N.Y............................................. Long Island Intracoastal Waterway, New York............................ Mamaroneck Harbor, N.Y......... ................................... Milton Habor, N.Y. ................................ M oriches Inlet, N.Y. ........................................ N ew York Bight . ..... .......................................... W estchester Creek, N.Y......... .................................... Total Cost of Reconnaissance and Condition Survey in FY 1981 was $806,608. June 1981 June 1981 Nov. 1981 June 1981 Jan. 1981 Nov. 1980 Oct. 1980, June 1981 Oct. 1980 Jan. 1981 Oct. 1980 June 1981 Feb. 1981 Jan. 1981 Nov. 1980, Jan. 1981, June 1981, Aug. 1981 July 1981 Oct. 1980, May 1981 Jan. 1981, June 1981 May 1981 Nov. 1980 Aug. 1981 Nov. 1980 Dec. 1980 Mar. 1981, Aug. 1981 Dec. 1980, Aug. 1981 Nov. 1980 2-34 TABLE 2-F Name of Project NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT TABLE 2-G OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sept. 30, 1981 Full Report See Annual Operation and Projects Report For Construction Maintenance Bay Ridge and Red Hook Channels, N.Y. 1980 5,523,29735 19,672,988 Browns Creek, N.Y. 1980 33,97636 505,369 Burlington Harbor, Vt.' 1966 706,4149 283,556 Buttermilk Channel, N.Y. 1979 - 3,791,773 Channel between North and South Hero Island, Lake Champlain, Vt.1,2 1909 31,000 1,288 Cheesequake Creek, N.J. (Active)1,25 1953 40,000 30,675 Coney Island Inlet N.Y. 1973 111,371 284,109 Coney Island Creek, N.Y. (Active)"' 5 1952 69,489 6,203 East Chester Creek, N.Y. 1975 592,0564,23 755,0424 Echo Bay Harbor, N.Y.' 1953 64,584 11,57111 Fire Island Inlet, N.Y. 1973 594,355 2,908,786 Flushing Bay and Creek, N.Y.' 1974 2,102,9056,7 727,7646 Glen Cove Harbor, N.Y. (Active)",5 1966 72,00033 2,455 Gordons Landing, Lake Champlain, Vt. ,1,2 1892 34,750 115 Gowanus Creek Channel, N.Y. 1972 346,831 255,291 Great Chazy River, N.Y. 1980 18,000 292,919 Great Kills Harbor, N.Y.1.2 1962 137,301'5 88,029 Great Lakes to Hudson River Waterway, N.Y. 1976 5,64413 457 Great South Bay, N.Y.' 1974 266,857 1,290,469 Greenport Harbor, N.Y.' 1953 74,681 21,720 Harlem River, N.Y.' 1969 3,616,119 480,777 Hempstead Harbor, N.Y. 1969 39,468 76,49716 Hudson River Channel, N.Y. 1980 6,771,87037 24,970,637 Huntington Harbor, N.Y. (Active)"' 5 1953 71,53518,33 60,535 Keyport Harbor, N.J.' 1968 40,475 215,951 Lake Montauk Harbor, N.Y. 1976 791,680' 7 1,236,709 Larchmont Harbor, N.Y. 1970 76,065 267,768 Lemon Creek, N.Y. (Inactive) 2,3 1937 6,62119 1,621 Little Neck Bay, N.Y.' 1969 1,741,21020 537 Long Island Intracoastal Waterway, N.Y. 1979 245,146 2,379,862 Manhasset Bay, N.Y. (Inactive)3 1948 - 4,636 Matawan Creek, N.J. (Active)2 ,5 1968 21,000 165,341 Milton Harbor, N.Y. 1976 151,37323 525,520 Newark Bay, Hackensack and Passaic Rivers, N.J. 1980 28,384,51138,39 15,999,03640 New Rochelle Harbor, N.Y.',2 1971 73,2148 142,411 Newtown Creek, N.Y. (Active)"' 1974 1,168,354 1,626,35124 Northport Harbor, N.Y.' 1956 78,64425 1,487 Orowoc Creek, N.Y. (Inactive)3 1949 - 4,951 Otter Creek, Vt. 1977 60,254 27,059 Peconic River, N.Y.' 1953 25,000 116,509 Peekskill Harbor, N.Y.' 1951 19,400 66,037 Plattsburgh Harbor, N.Y.' 1972 198,415 229,111 Portchester Harbor, N.Y. (Active)"' 5 1967 433,47033 443,79526 Port Henry Harbor, N.Y.' 1931 69,40627 1,299 Port Jefferson Harbor, N.Y. 1977 221,12834 359,294 Rahway River, N.J. (To Be Restudied)3 1949 37,0004 5734 Raritan River to Arthur Kill Cutoff Channel, N.J.' 1972 810,500 2,019,141 Rondout Harbor, N.Y.' 1972 142,437 260,441 Rouses Point, Lake Champlain, N.Y.' 1895 98,468 249 Sag Harbor, N.Y.' 1964 121,80528 11,710 St. Albans Harbor, Lake Champlain, Vt.'2 1917 3,125 385 Sandy Hook Bay, N.J.' 1957 508,93629 154,565 Sandy Hook Bay at Leonardo, N.J.",2 1967 56,470 93,964 Saugerties Harbor, N.Y.1,2 1968 81,905 169,18130 Sheepshead Bay, N.Y.' 1948 33,828 5,364 Shinnecock Inlet, N.Y. 1961 - 22 Shoal Harbor and Compton Creek, N.J. 1978 - 373,940 Shrewsbury River, N.J. 1979 1,145,4582122 1,732,88010 Staten Island Rapid Transit Railway Co. bridge across Arthur Kill, N.Y. 1973 7,730,476 Sumpawanus (Babylon Creek) Inlet, N.Y.' 2 1895 7,000 13 Swanton Harbor, Vt. (Inactive)2 1888 70,500" 235 Tarirytown Harbor, N.Y.' 1974 69,836 431,199 Ticonderoga River, N.Y. (Inactive)2 1895 16,500 1,260 Wallabout Channel, N.Y.' 1953 18,174 36,312 Wappinger Creek, N.Y.'.2 1950 13,000 44,691 Washington Canal and South River, N.J.' 1953 206,1168' 212,82732 Waycake Creek, N.J.2.3 1949 - 2,781 Woodbridge Creek, N.J.' 1953 49,823 178,398 2-35 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 2-G (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS 1. Completed. 2. No commerce reported. 3. Awaiting local cooperation. 4. Costs for previous projects only. 5. A portion of this project is classified "inactive." 6. Includes $628,502 for new work and $210,365 for maintenance for previous projects. 7. Excludes $419,879 for new work expended from contributed funds and $58,425 contributed funds other and $8,752 expended by the Worlds Fair Corp. for riprap protection of rubble dike. 8. Includes $43,175 for new work for previous projects. 9. Includes costs of maintenance prior to July 1, 1886. Excludes $1,425,133 for rehabilitation. 10. Includes $286,606 for maintenance for previous projects. 11. Includes $10 for maintenance for previous projects. 12. Excludes $29,774 for new work expended from contributed funds. 13. Includes $4,813,400 for new work expended from emergency relief funds. 14. Excludes $94,366 for rehabilitation. 15. Excludes $104,805 for new work expended from contributed funds. 16. Includes $64,034 for maintenance for previous projects. 17. Excludes $104,805 for new work expended from contributed funds. 18. Excludes $19,546 for new work expended from contributed funds and $31,454 to be contributed. 19. This amount also included in costs for New York and New Jersey channels. No work has been done on the existing project for Lemon Creek. 20. Excludes $1,741,210 for new work expended from contributed funds. TABLE 2-H OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH 21. Includes $220,894 for new work for previous projects. 22. Excludes $36,311 for new work expended from contributed funds. 23. Excludes $119,276 for new work expended from contributed funds. In addition, excludes $72,619 for new work expended from contributed funds, other. 24. Includes $1,490,713 for maintenance for previous projects. 25. Excludes $15,000 for new work expended from contributed funds. 26. Includes $16,369 for maintenance for previous projects. 27. Excludes $10,000 for new work expended from contributed funds. 28. Excludes $66,758 for rehabilitation. 29. Excludes $53,790 for new work expended from contributed funds. 30. Includes $15,000 for maintenance for previous projects. 31. Excludes $365 for new work expended from contributed funds. 32. Includes $84,934 for maintenance for previous projects. 33. Uncompleted portion deauthorized on August 5, 1977. 34. Includes costs for new work $171,427 and maintenance $20,646 for previous projects. 35. Includes $1,246,100 for new work for previous projects and $64,560 extended from public works funds. 36. Excludes $71,423 for rehabilitation. 37. Includes $346,797 for maintenance for previous project. 38. Includes $1,836,403 for new work expended from contributed funds. 39. Excludes $285,600 for new work expended from contributed funds. 40. Includes $1,490,713 for maintenance for previous projects. EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sept. 30, 1981 Full Report See Annual Operation and Projects Report For Construction Maintenance Atlantic Coast of N.J., Sandy Hook to Barnegat Inlets' 1959 - - North Shore of Long Island, Suffolk County, N.Y. 1979 8,880,000' - Perth Amboy, N.J. 1966 - - 1. Deferred. 2-36 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Projects Adams, Hoosic River Basin, Mass.' Bennington, Vt. Byram River at Pemberwick, Conn.1.3 East Barre Dam, Winooski River, Vt.' East Rockaway Inlet to Rockaway Inlet and Jamaica Bay, N.Y. (Part II) Herkimer, N.Y. Hoosic Falls, Hoosic River Basin, N.Y.' Lamoille River, Vt.: Hardwick Dams,4 5 ,9 Johnson Gorges' Mississquoi River at Richford, Vt.",3 North Adams, Hoosic River Basin, Mass. North Ellenville, N.Y. Proctor, Otter Creek Basin, Vt.4, o� Rahway, N.J. Rahway, South Branch, N.J. Rome, Mohawk River, N.Y.4 Rosendale, N.Y. Rutland, Otter Creek, Vt.4 Sandburg Creek, Spring Glen, N.Y. South Amsterdam, Mohawk River, N.Y.' Wappinger Creek at Pleasant Valley, .N.Y. " 3 Waterbury Reservoir, Winooski River Basin, Vt. Waterbury, Winooski River Basin, Vt. Waterford, Hudson and Mohawk Rivers, N.Y.4 Winooski River, Vt.' Wrightsville Dam, Winooski River Basin, Vt. For Last Full Report See Annual Report For 1964 1974 1959 1963 1976 1973 1956 1939 1939 1965 1968 1978 1937 1971 1979 1959 1975 1963 1976 1967 1959 1976 1951 1940 1940 1970 Cost to Sept. 30, 1981 Operation and Construction 6,282,3072 670,000 363,515 2,832,084 1,185,365 1,301,2759 1,064,626 49,8376 221,476 15,409,3257 3,900,650 973,1428 15,863,723 3,684,966 211,015 109,702 1,564,976 142,075 883,769 9,253 5,897,427 1,549,929 Maintenance 8,200 - - - - - - - 8,0 1. Completed. 2. Excludes costs of $913,360 under other contributed funds. 3. Authorized by Chief of Engineers pursuant to Sec. 205, Public Law 858, 80th Cong., as amended. 4. Inactive. 5. Includes $23,507 emergency relief funds. 6. Excludes cost of $2,718,624 under other contributed funds. 7. Excludes cost of $21,000 under other contributed funds. 8. Excludes cost of $51,500 under other contributed funds. 9. Uncompleted portion has been deauthorized on August 5, 1977. 10. Entire project deauthorized August 5, 1977. 2-37 TABLE 2-I REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 SURVEYS (See Section 44 of Text) Study Class Navigation Studies Flood Control Studies Beach Erosion Studies Special Studies' 'Includes review of Authorized Projects, Inventory of Dams, Coordination Studies with Other Agencies, International Water Studies, Phase 1 Studies and $433,809 by North Atlantic Division. TABLE 2-K FLOOD PLAIN STUDIES COMPLETED DURING THE PERIOD (See Section 45 of Text) Requesting Agency Date Completed NONE-PROGRAM TERMINATED TABLE 2-L COSTS FOR FLOOD PLAIN MANAGEMENT SERVICES (See Section 45 of Text) Studies and Services Costs Flood Plain Technical Services $60,224 Flood Plain Management Unit 70,009 Flood Plain Management Unit-North Atlantic Division Office 64,106 Total $194,339 TABLE 2-M DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last FUNDS EXPENDED Full Report See Annual Date Contributed Projects Report For Deauthorized Construction Funds Brown's Creek, N.Y. 1980 Aug. 1977 33,9768 East Rockaway (DEBS) Inlet, N.Y. - Aug. 1977 - Elizabeth River, N.J. - Aug. 1977 - Glen Cove Harbor, N.Y. (Active)2' 3 1966 Aug. 1977 72,0004 Huntington Habor, N.Y. (Active)2 . 1953 Aug. 1977 71,53545- Irvington Habor, N.Y. - Aug. 1977 - Portchester Habor, N.Y. (Active)2 ,3 1967 Aug. 1977 433,470- Lamoille River, Vt. - Aug. 1977 - Proctor, Otter Creek Basin, Vt.6,7 1937 Aug. 1977 - Swanton Harbor, Vt. (Inactive)' 1888 Aug. 1977 70,500- 1. No commerce reported. 2. Completed. 3. A portion of this project is classified "inactive." 4. Uncompleted portion deauthorized on August 5, 1977. 5. Excludes $19,546 for new work expended from contributed funds and $31,454 to be contributed. 6. Inactive. 7. Entire project deauthorized August 5, 1977. 8. Excludes $71,423 for rehabilitation. 2-38 TABLE 2-J Cost Total Surveys $356,116 882,966 0 4,791,580 $6,030,662 Location Federal Cost PHILADELPHIA, PA., DISTRICT* This district comprises a portion of southeastern New York, eastern Pennsylvania, western and southern New Jersey, northern and southeastern Delaware, and a small part of northeastern Maryland embraced in the drainage basins tributary to the Atlantic Ocean from Manasquan River, N.J., inclusive, to south boundary of Delaware. It also includes Chesapeake and Delaware Canal and approach channel thereto in Chesapeake Bay and Elk River, Md. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Channels and Harbors Page 1. Absecon Inlet, N.J ................ 3-2 2. Barnegat Inlet, N.J ............. 3-2 3. Cold Spring Inlet, N.J. ............. 3-3 4. Delaware River between Philadelphia, Pa., and Trenton, N.J. .. 3-3 5. Delaware River, Pa., N.J. and Del. Philadelphia to the Sea ............ 3-4 6. Delaware River at Camden, N.J. ..... 3-5 7. Harbor of Refuge, Delaware Bay, Del................ 3-6 8. Indian River Inlet and Bay, Del....... 3-6 9. Inland Waterway from Chincoteague Bay, Va. to Delaware Bay, Del................ 3-7 10. Inland Waterway, Rehoboth Bay to Delaware Bay, Del.................. 3-7 11. Inland Waterway from Delaware River to Chesapeake Bay, Del., and Md. ... 3-8 12. Little River, Del. ................ 3-9 13. Manasquan River, N.J. ............. 3-9 14. Mispillion River, Del. ............. 3-10 15. Murderkill River, Del.............. 3-11 16. New Jersey Intracoastal Waterway ... 3-11 17. Raccoon Creek, N.J............... 3-12 18. Schuylkill River, Pa .............. 3-12 19. Waterway from Indian River Inlet to Rehoboth Bay, Del. ............... 3-13 20. Wilmington Harbor, Del .......... 3-14 21. Other Authorized Navigation Projects ...................... 3-14 22. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ................... 3-14 Beach Erosion Control 23. Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects ................. 24. Beach Erosion Control Work Under Special Authorization ....... Flood Control Local Protection Page 25. Delaware Coast Protection, Del...... 3-15 26. Hay Creek, Birdsboro, Schuylkill River Basin, Pa.......... 3-15 27. Pottstown and Vicinity, Schuylkill River Basin ............ 3-15 28. Tamaqua, Pa.................... 3-16 Reservoirs Page 29. Beltzville Lake, Pa................ 3-16 30. Blue Marsh Lake, Pa.............. 3-17 31. Francis E. Walter Dam, Pa.......... 3-17 32. General Edgar Jadwin Dam and Reservoir, Pa. ................... 3-18 33. Prompton Lake, Pa. .............. 3-18 34. Trexler Lake, Pa. ................ 3-19 35. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ................. 3-20 36. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ....................... 3-20 37. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ............. 3-20 38. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys ........................ 3-20 General Investigations 39. Surveys... ..................... 40. Collection and Study of Basic Data .. 41. Shoreline Erosion Control Demonstration .................. Page 3-20 3-20 3-20 Page 3-15 3-15 *All costs and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 3-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 Navigation 1. ABSECON INLET, N.J. Location. On New Jersey coast about 65 miles north of Delaware breakwater, between Brigantine Beach on the north and Absecon Beach on the south. It forms entrance to harbor at Atlantic City, N.J. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 826 and 1217). Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1936, page 319. Existing project. This provides for an inlet entrance channel 20 feet deep at mean low water and 400 feet wide, for an entrance channel 15 feet deep and 200 feet wide from the inlet channel into Clam Creek, and for a turning basin 15 feet deep within Clam Creek. The act authorizing the inlet entrance channel also provides that should the channel at any time have a deleterious effect on the Atlantic City Beach, work upon the improvements may cease; it being understood that the project is adopted on the basis that the interests of the beach in front of the city are superior to those of the inlet. The total length of the section included in the project is about 1.5 miles. The extreme tidal range, due to ocean storms, is about 11 feet. The cost for the completed project was $307,712. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with except that local interests are required to furnish suitable spoil-disposal areas for maintenance when and as required for the dredging of the entrance channel into Clam Creek and the turning basin within Clam Creek. Terminal facilities. See pages 239 and 240 of Annual Report for 1962. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance, contract: Costs for major accomplishments were $1,091 for coastal engineering study. Maintenance, hired labor: Costs for major accomplishments were $9,817 for economic study. Condition as of Sept. 30. Project was completed May 1957. Inlet channel was completed in 1938. Dredging entrance from inlet channel into Clam Creek was completed in 1957. Costs for existing project were $307,712 for new work and $5,553,413 for maintenance, a total of $5,861,125. 2. BARNEGAT INLET, N.J. Location. On east coast of New Jersey about 50 miles south of Sandy Hook, between Island Beach on the north and Long Beach on the south (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Chart Nos. 825 and 1216). This inlet is main entrance to Barnegat Bay, largest of the bays on New Jersey coast which are separated from the ocean by narrow barrier beaches. Existing project. Provides for a channel 8 feet deep through inlet and 10 feet through outer bar, channel to be protected by two converging stone jetties extending to 12-foot contour in the ocean and spaced 1,000 feet apart at outer ends; a channel of suitable hydraulic characteristics extending in a northwesterly direction from gorge in inlet to Oyster Creek Channel just northwest of Sunset Shoal, thence via Oyster Creek Channel to deep water in the bay; and maintenance of a channel 8 feet deep and 200 feet wide to connect Barnegat City Harbor with main inlet channel. Total length of section included in project is about 4.5 miles. Plane of reference is mean low water. Extreme tidal range at inlet is from about 2 feet below mean low water to about 3 feet above mean high water. Cost for new work for completed project was $448,849 exclusive of $300,000 contributed by local interests. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing projects.) 3-2 PHILADELPHIA, PA., DISTRICT Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are four docks or terminals in inner harbor at Barnegat Light which furnish adequate facilities for present commerce of locality. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance, contract: Cost for major accomplishments were for dredging during the period of 3 August 1981 through 29 August 1981. Removed a total of 59,000 cubic yards of material at a cost of $117,544. Other costs were for coastal engineering. Maintenance, hired labor: Costs for major accomplishments were estimated at $87,600 for dredging by Hopper Dredge Fry. An estimated 12,200 cubic yards of material was removed during the period of 1 October 1980 through 15 October 1980, and 24 September 1981 through 30 September 1981. Other costs incurred were for engineering surveys, general maintenance, coastal engineering and supervision and administration. Condition as of Sept. 30. Project was completed in 1940. (For details, see page 203, Annual Report for 1964). Cost under existing projects, excluding $300,000 contributed funds expended for new work, were $448,849 for new work and $7,980,558 for maintenance, a total of $8,429,407. 3. COLD SPRING INLET, N.J. Location. In Cape May County, southern New Jersey, about 3 miles east of Cape May City and about 16 miles northeast of Delaware breakwater. Inlet connects Cape May Harbor and New Jersey Intracoastal Waterway with the Atlantic Ocean and is about 1 mile long. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 234, 827 and 1219). Existing project. This provides for an entrance channel 25 feet deep and 400 feet wide, protected by two parallel jetties, and extending from the 25-foot depth curve in the Atlantic Ocean to a line 500 feet harborward of a line joining the inner ends of the jetties; thence 20 feet deep and 300 feet wide to deep water in Cape May Harbor. The total length of the section included in the project is about 2.25 miles. Extreme tidal range, due to ocean storms, is about 11 feet. Cost of new work for completed project was $879,275 exclusive of $100,000 contributed by local interests and $50,000 Navy Department funds. (See table at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Complied with Act of 1907, except work of deepening and enlarging inner harbor, which is 80 percent complete. Terminal facilities. See page 238, Annual Report for 1962. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance, contract: Costs for major accomplishments were $556 for coastal engineering. Maintenance, hired labor: Costs for major accomplishments were $1,032 for economic evaluation, and $663 for engineering surveys. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was completed in 1942. (For details see page 238, Annual Report for 1962.) 4. DELAWARE RIVER BETWEEN PHILADELPHIA, PA., AND TRENTON, N.J. Location. Rises in southeastern New York, flows generally southerly 367 miles, forming boundary line between New York and New Jersey on the east and Pennsylvania and Delaware on the west, and empties into Delaware Bay. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 1218, 280, 294, 295, and 296.) Previous projects. For details see page 1778 of Annual Report for 1915, page 311 of Annual Report for 1924, page 220 of Annual Report for 1934, and page 296, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. A channel from Allegheny Avenue, Philadelphia, 23.5 miles to upstream end of Newbold Island 40 feet deep and 400 feet wide, with suitable widening of bends, including relocation of channel at Delair Railroad bridge, and reconstruction of bridge, thence 5.5 miles to upper end of Trenton Marine Terminal, 35 feet deep and 300 feet wide, with a turning basin 800 feet wide and 1,700 feet long at the terminal; and maintenance of a channel 12 feet deep and 300 feet wide from upper end of 34-foot channel to Penn Central Railroad Bridge at Trenton, dredged under a previous project. Project also provides for an auxiliary channel 20 feet deep and 200 feet wide east of 3-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 Burlington Island, extending easterly from main channel to upper end of U.S. Pipe and Foundry Co.'s property at East Burlington, with a turning basin 450 feet wide at upper end; for initial excavation, only, of a cross channel 8 feet deep and 200 feet wide through artificial island opposite Delanco, N.J., and for construction such bank protection works as may be necessary. Section included in project is about 30.5 miles long, excluding auxiliary channel east of Burlington Island, which is 1.4 miles long, and cross channel opposite Delanco. Lower end is about 55 miles above river mouth at Liston Point and about 105 miles above Harbor of Refuge at mouth of Delaware Bay. Freshets, which occur usually during February and March, attain a height of 9 to 20 feet above mean low water in vicinity of Trenton. Navigation is occasionally suspended during a portion of winter months due to ice. Total estimated cost for new work is $69,663,904 (July 1965), exclusive of amounts expended for previous projects; $15,000 contributed funds and dredging upper channel, Newbold Island to Trenton, estimated cost $7,507,900 (July 1962). (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Modification authorized by 1954 River and Harbor Act provides local interests must provide suitable terminal facilities, furnish lands and rights-of-way for construction and future maintenance, and hold the United States free from damages. Local interests complied with requirements, except city of Trenton has not provided suitable terminal facilities. Terminal facilities. There are 21 piers, wharves, and docks from Allegheny Avenue, Philadelphia, Pa., to Trenton, N.J. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (For details see Port Series No. 8 (revised 1966) Corps of Engineers.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance, contract: Costs for major accomplishments were dredging during the period of 29 June 1981 through 30 September 1981. Removed a total of 511,500 cubic yards of material at a cost of $2,850,000. Other costs were $10,750 environmental monitoring; $28,803 investigation of disposal sites; $38,007 stream gaging; and $10,000 for aerial photos. Maintenance, hired labor: Costs for major accomplishments were $191,819 engineering survey, general maintenance; $50,875 plans and specification; $67,823 supervision and administration. Other costs incurred were for streambank erosion, environmental monitoring, snagging and clearing and economic study. Condition as of Sept. 30. Existing project is 90 percent complete. A 40-foot channel under the 1954 modification from Allegheny Avenue to upper end of Newbold Island was completed April 1964. Work remaining is dredging from upper end of Newbold Island to Trenton Marine Terminal and widening turning basin at terminal which is in deferred category. (See Table 3-C at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1980.) 5. DELAWARE RIVER, PA., N.J. AND DEL., PHILADELPHIA TO THE SEA Location. See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 1218, 394, 295, and 280. Previous projects. For details see page 1779 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 299, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Provides for a channel from deep water in Delaware Bay to a point in the bay, near Ship John Light, 40 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide; thence to Philadelphia Naval Base, 40 feet deep and 800 feet wide, with 1,200-foot width at Bulkhead Bar and 1,000-foot width at other bends; thence to Allegheny Avenue, Philadelphia, Pa., 40 feet deep and 500 feet wide through Horseshoe Bend and 40 feet deep and 400 feet wide through Philadelphia Harbor, along west side of channel; and for anchorages at Reedy Point, Deepwater Point, Marcus Hook, and Mantua Creek, each 40 feet deep and 2,300 feet wide with respective lengths of 8,000, 5,200, 13,650, and 11,500 feet; anchorage at Gloucester 30 feet deep and about 3,500 feet long. Project also provides for construction of dikes and training works for regulation and control of tidal flow; for maintenance of an area on north side of channel opposite Philadelphia Naval Base between Shipway 3 and Schuylkill River to 40 feet deep and a width of 150 feet on Mifflin Range and of 200 feet on West Horseshoe Range; and for maintenance of any areas dredged by local interests to 35 feet deep between channel and a line 100 feet channelward of pierhead line between Point House wharf and Philadelphia Naval Base, when in opinion of Chief of Engineers such areas are so located as to be of benefit to general navigation. Section included in project is about 96.5 miles long. All depths 3-4 PHILADELPHIA, PA., DISTRICT refer to plane of mean low water. Under influence of heavy and long-continued winds extreme tidal range is about 14 feet. Normal maximum velocity of tidal currents in the dredged channel varies between 2 and 3.5 miles per hour. Storm tides may increase maximum to as much as 4.5 miles per hour. Estimated cost for new work is $71,630,000 (July 1972) exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects. Channel to 37 feet deep and 500 feet wide through Horseshoe Bend and 37 feet deep and 600 feet wide through Philadelphia Harbor along east side of channel and Port Richmond anchorage to 37 feet deep, except for that portion of channel which forms a part of 40 feet deep and 400 feet wide channel portion of project is to be restudied and excluded from foregoing cost estimate. Estimated cost (July 1960) of this portion is $2,951,000. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Requirements under 1938 River and Harbor Act for maintaining channel and anchorage in Philadelphia Harbor annually by cities of Philadelphia and Camden were removed (see 1962 Annual Report for details). Terminal facilities. There are 217 piers, wharves, and docks between Allegheny Avenue, Philadelphia and the sea, 135 on waterfront of Philadelphia, Camden, and Gloucester, and 82 below Philadelphia. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (For further details see Port Series Nos. 7, revised 1967, and 8, revised 1966 - Corps of Engineers). Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance, contract: Costs for major accomplishments were $488,576 raise banks; $300,000 mobilization, plans and specifications. Other costs incurred were for stream gaging, submerged pipeline, handling shore pipe, construct steel sluices, raise dikes, general maintenance and engineering and design studies. Maintenance, hired labor: Costs for major accomplishments were $569,691 general maintenance; $241,403 disposal area; 128,114 raise banks; $53,560 submerged pipeline; $40,748 handling shore pipe; $37,174 environmental monitoring; $-701,340 amortization; $312,199 engineering surveys and supervision and administration. Other costs incurred were for steel sluices, and snagging and clearing. Dredging by U.S. Hopper Dredge Comber and Goethals commenced on 1 October 1980 through 30 September 1981. Removed a total of 3,090,000 cubic yards of material at a cost of $11,069,764. Condition as of Sept. 30. Existing project, excluding work deferred for restudy, is about 66 percent complete. The 40-foot channel from naval base to the sea was completed in 1942. Dredging Naval Base to Allegheny Avenue to 40 feet deep was completed in 1962. Enlarging anchorage at Marcus Hook was completed in 1967. Work remaining is to construct new anchorages at Reedy Point and Deepwater Point, and enlarge Mantua Creek anchorage, channel dredging from 35 to 37 feet deep over a width of 500 feet through Horseshoe Bend and 600 feet through Philadelphia Harbor, and deepening Port Richmond Anchorage to 37 feet, all of which have been deferred for restudy. (See Table 3-C at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1980.) 6. DELAWARE RIVER AT CAMDEN, N.J. Location. Camden, N.J., on east bank of Delaware River, is directly opposite city of Philadelphia, Pa. It is about 51 miles above mouth of river and about 101 miles above Harbor of Refuge at mouth of Delaware Bay. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 295 and 280.) Previous projects. Adopted by River and Harbor Act of June 25, 1910. No work was done on this project. For further details, see page 321, Annual Report for 1932. Existing project. See page 217, Annual Report for 1962. Cost for new work for completed portions of project was $464,906 and $15,000, Federal and non-Federal funds, respectively. Deepening 37-foot portion of project previously deferred for restudy reactivated in 1981. Study will be initiated in FY82 and expected to be completed in 1984. Estimated cost of this portion, as revised in October 1981, was $5,080,000. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 55 piers, wharves, and docks near project area along Delaware River waterfront at Camden and Gloucester, N.J., including 3 oil terminals on Petty Island. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. 3-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 Operatio s a/nd result.s during fiscal tyear. Maintenance, hired labor: Costs incurred were for economic study and study management. Coiditio i.i as of Sept. 30. Project was about 36 percent complete. Work remaining is deepening channel from 30 to 37 feet which was placed in deferred restudy category. Controlling depths at local mean low water were as follows: In February 1962, 11.8 feet at northerly end of 18-foot channel opposite Cooper Point; and 30 feet in front of marine terminal. Project depths are well maintained in 30-foot depth section of channel. Cost under existing project, excluding $15,000 contributed funds expended for new work, were $462,906 for new work; and $361,862 for maintenance, a total of $824,768. 7. HARBOR OF REFUGE, DELAWARE BAY, DEL. Location. At lower end of Delaware Bay, a few miles from Atlantic Ocean on Delaware side of bay. It is about 120 miles south of New York Harbor, about 114 miles north of entrance to Chesapeake Bay and about 101 miles from Philadelphia, Pa. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 1218, 1219 and 379.) Pre'ious projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1874, Chart II, page 146; page 330; and 1938, page 330. Existing Project. For details see page 229 of Annual Report for 1962. New work cost for completed project was $2,412,778. Local ooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. See page 229 of Annual Report for 1962. Operations and results during fiscal v ear. Maintenance, contract: Dredging commenced on 1 October 1980 through 13 October 1980, removed 308,000 cubic yards of material at a cost of $181,436. Maintenance, hired labor: Costs incurred were for engineering survey and supervision and administration. Conditions as o Sept. 30. Existing project was completed in 1951. For details see page 230 of Annual Report for 1962. Controlling depth at mean low water in channel in July 1963 was 16.8 feet. Costs for existing project were $2,412,778 for new work and $1,132,954 for maintenance, a total of $3,545,732. 8. INDIAN RIVER INLET AND BAY, DEL. Location. Indian River rises in Sussex County, Del., and flows easterly 13 miles into Indian River Bay which is a shallow lagoon 6 miles long and 2 miles wide on the Delaware Coast about midway between Cape Henlopen and the Maryland State line. The inlet is an opening through the barrier beach separating Indian River Bay and the Atlantic Ocean. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 1219.) Previous projects. Adopted by River and Harbor Act of August 2, 1882. For further details see page 744, Annual Report for 1888. Existing project. This provides for the fixation of the inlet by the construction of two parallel jetties of steel-sheet pile and stone design extending to approximately the 14-foot depth curve in the ocean, and for dredging an entrance channel 15 feet deep and 200 feet wide, for a distance of 7,000 feet inshore from the jetties; thence a channel 9 feet deep, 100 feet wide in the bay, and 80 feet wide in the river, to and including a turning basin 9 feet deep, 175 feet wide, and 300 feet long at Old Landing; thence a channel 4 feet deep and 60 feet wide to the highway bridge at Millsboro. The project also provides that the interior channel dimensions may, in the discretion of the Chief of Engineers, be modified as found desirable to increase the hydraulic efficiency of the channel, without increasing the cost. The total length of the section included in the project is about 13.75 miles. All depths refer to the plane of mean low water. The extreme tidal range at the highway bridge is about 6 feet. The cost for new work for the completed project was $511,210, exclusive of $10,000 expended on previous projects and exclusive of $210,000 contributed funds. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Local c ooperation. Fully complied with except that local interests are required to furnish suitable areas for disposal of dredged material during maintenance as and when needed, and provide terminal facilities. 3-6 PHILADELPHIA, PA., DISTRICT Terminal facilities. There is a privately owned basin with berthing facilities for small boats located .75 mile west of the highway bridge near the inlet and .25 mile north of the inlet channel, connected therewith by a channel 6 feet deep and 40 feet wide; a U.S. Coast Guard wharf on the north side of the inlet channel in the same locality; and two wharves at Oak Orchard in Indian River Bay. The facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance, contract: Major costs incurred were $65,780 for marsh development; and $18,011 jetty rehabilitation. Other costs incurred were for water and sedimentation testing, and coastal engineering. Maintenance, hired labor: Costs incurred were for economic study and supervision and administration. Condition as of Sept. 30. Existing project �was completed in 1951. For details see Annual Report for 1963. Costs under existing project, excluding $210,000 contributed funds expended for new work, were $511,210 for new work, $2,736,421 for maintenance and $1,323,775 for major rehabilitation, a total of $4,571,406. 9. INLAND WATERWAY FROM CHINCOTEAGUE BAY, VA., TO DELAWARE BAY, DEL. Location. Extends northerly from Chincoteague Bay, Va., following waterways parallel with Atlantic Ocean through Virginia, Maryland, and Delaware, passing through neck of land at Ocean View, Del., and lands between Rehoboth Bay and headwaters of Lewes River, entering Delaware Bay at or near town of Lewes, a total distance of about 70 miles. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 1218, 1219, and 1220.) Previous projects. For details see page 382, Annual Report for 1932. Existing project. Provides for maintenance of three bridges built by the Government at Ocean View, Del., under previous project. Existing project was adopted by 1910 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 538, 59th Cong., 1st Sess.). Latest published map is in House Document 128, 67th Congress, 2d Session. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. See page 232, Annual Report for 1962. Operations and results during period. Maintenance, hired labor: Costs were $1,177 for supervision and administration. Condition as of Sept. 30. For details see page 245, Annual Report for 1963. Costs under existing project excluding $2,000 contributed by State of Delaware, were $69,477 for maintenance. 10. INLAND WATERWAY, REHOBOTH BAY TO DELAWARE BAY, DEL. Location. A tidal canal in southeasterly part of Sussex County, Del. It extends 12 miles northward from Rehoboth Bay through high land west of town of Rehoboth to Gordon Lake; thence through marshes back of Cape Henlopen to Lewes River; thence down Lewes River to its junction with Broadkill River near its mouth. An entrance to the waterway from Delaware Bay is about 4 miles above Cape Henlopen. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 379, 1218, and 1219.) Previous projects. A canal along a slightly different route formed a part of projected waterway from Chincoteague Bay, Va. to Delaware Bay, begun in 1886 and abandoned in 1905. Existing project. This provides for an entrance channel near Lewes 10 feet deep and 200 feet wide protected by two parallel jetties 500 feet apart; thence a channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide to South Street Bridge at Lewes, and a basin of the same depth 1,200 feet long and up to 375 feet in width at the latter point; thence a channel 6 feet deep and 50 feet wide (40 feet wide through Deep Cut near Rehoboth) to Rehoboth Bay; a channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide from the entrance to Broadkill River; two parallel rubble jetties 725 feet long at the Rehoboth Bay entrance; and the construction of one highway bridge and one railroad bridge at Rehoboth. The total length of the section included in the project is about 12 miles. The cost for new work for the completed portion of the project was $561,514, exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects and $60,000 contributed funds. The extension of the jetties at the Delaware Bay entrance is considered to be inactive and is excluded from 3-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 the foregoing cost. The cost of the portion was last revised in 1960 and was estimated to be $816,000. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Complied with except local interests must furnish suitable terminal facilities and necessary spoil-disposal areas. Terminal facilities. See page 228, Annual Report for 1962. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance, contract: Major costs incurred were $60,000 beach restoration. Other costs incurred were for stream gaging. Maintenance, hired labor: Major costs incurred were $18,134 hydropower study. Other costs incurred were for preparation of scope of work. Conditions as of Sept. 30. Existing project is about 70 percent complete. For details on completed work see page 241 of Annual Report for 1963. Work remaining, extension of existing jetties at Delaware Bay entrance, is considered inactive. 11. INLAND WATERWAY FROM DELAWARE RIVER TO CHESAPEAKE BAY, DEL., AND MD. Location. Begins at Reedy Point on Delaware River, about 41 miles below Philadelphia, Pa., and passes through sea level Chesapeake and Delaware Canal, a distance of 14 miles, to Back Creek, at Chesapeake City, Md. It then passes for 5 miles down Back Creek, thence 9 miles down Elk River to Chesapeake Bay and thence 18 miles down Chesapeake Bay to a point near Pooles Island. A branch channel connects Delaware River at Delaware City, Del., with main channel at a point about 1.5 miles west of Reedy Point. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 294, 1226, 570, and 572.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Report for 1934, page 242, and Annual Report for 1938, page 312. Existing project. A channel 35 feet deep and 450 feet wide from Delaware River through Elk River and Chesapeake Bay to water of natural 35-foot depth in Chesapeake Bay including a cutoff at Penn Central Railroad crossing, and having a minimum radius of curvature of 7,000 feet at bends; a high-level, fixed railroad bridge with vertical clearance of 135 feet and horizontal clearance of 600 feet at the railroad crossing over the cutoff (economic study of railroad crossing requested by Office of Management and Budget resulted in construction of a single track vertical lift bridge in lieu of a high-level fixed railroad bridge); high-level fixed highway bridges over canal at Reedy Point, St. Georges, Summit, and Chesapeake City; a bascule drawbridge across Delaware City Branch Channel; extension of entrance jetties at Reedy Point; and anchorage in Elk River, 35 feet deep and 1,200 feet wide, with an average length of 3,700 feet; enlargement of anchorage and mooring basin in Back Creek to afford an area about 400 feet wide, 1,000 feet long, and 12 feet deep; dredging Delaware City Branch Channel to 8 feet deep and 50 feet wide, and deepening existing basin to same depth; revetment of banks of canal as required between Delaware and Elk Rivers, and on banks of Delaware City Branch Channel east of Fifth Street Bridge; and construction of bulkheads. Total length of section included in project, excluding Delaware City Branch Channel, which is about 2 miles long, is about 46 miles. All depths refer to plane of mean low water in Delaware River. Extreme tidal range is from 6.3 feet above mean high water to 3 feet below mean low water. Original cost of canal including purchase was $10,709,755; estimated cost of new work for modifications of 1935 and 1954 is $139,574,000 (October 1977). Total estimated cost of new work including original purchase is $151,683,755. Portion of project comprising completion of Delaware City Branch Channel from a point 400 feet east of Fifth Street Bridge to its junction with canal is to be restudied and excluded from foregoing estimate. Estimated cost of this portion is $145,000 (July 1954). (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. River and Harbor Act of 1954 provided that local interests furnish lands and rights-of-way required for bridges. Assurances accepted and approved February 16, 1955. Requirements for Summit and Reedy Point Bridges have been met. Terminal facilities. Ample mooring facilities at eastern and western ends of canal and bulkheads at Delaware City and St. Georges were constructed by the United States. A small-boat harbor was provided and a wharf 3-8 PHILADELPHIA, PA., DISTRICT constructed at Chesapeake City. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work, hired labor: Costs incurred were for preparation of DM for protection of bridge fenders. Maintenance, contract: Costs for major accomplishments were $196,783 maintenance of rip-rap; $183,124 preparation of disposal area. Other costs incurred were for bridge load carrying capacity, welding, lock dispatch service, monitoring, plans and specifications, general maintenance, inspections and surveys. Dredging in Upper Chesapeake Bay commenced 1 October 1980 through 14 December 1980. A total of 1,678,900 cubic yards of material was removed at a cost of $3,491,391 and $1,702,532 dredging shoals. Maintenance, hired labor: Major costs incurred were $307,385 lock and dispatch service; $323,734 bridge painting; $191,150 banks and disposal area; $166,097 drainage; $113,052 roadways maintenance; $184,554 maintenance building grounds, service building and night lighting. Other costs incurred were for mosquito control, snagging and clearing, plans and specifications, general maintenance, engineering surveys, and supervision and administration. Dredging by U.S. Hopper Dredge Comber commenced 4 March 1981 through 10 April 1981. Removed a total of 505,000 cubic yards of material at a cost of $1,226,333. Condition as of Sept. 30. Existing project is about 89 percent completed. Channel 27 feet deep and 250 and 400 feet wide, Delaware River to Pooles Island, was completed in 1938. High-level fixed highway bridges were completed at St. Georges (4-lane) in 1942; at Chesapeake City (2-lane) in 1949; and at Summit (4-lane) in 1960. Relocation of Penn Central Railroad bridge was completed December 21, 1965. Channel enlargement to 35 feet deep and 450 feet wide between St. Georges and Summit bridges and Summit Bridge and Goose Island was completed on June 20, 1972 and February 18, 1972, respectively. Removing the old Penn Central railroad bridge was completed on January 21, 1972. Channel work for Part II is about 87 percent complete. Work remaining consists of completing channel enlargement to 35 feet deep and 450 feet wide between Reedy Point bridge and St. Georges Bridge; widening and deepening the channel between Delaware River and Reedy Point Bridge, the completion of recreation facilities, and miscellaneous completion items. Deepening Delaware City Branch Channel from 6 to 8 feet from a point 400 feet east of Fifth Street Bridge to its junction with the canal has been deferred for study. Total cost of existing project to Sept. 30, 1981 was $211,775,410 of which $121,822,547 was pnew work ($4,756,248 emergency relief funds and $117,066,299 regular funds), and $99,425,558 regular funds for maintenance. 12. LITTLE RIVER, DEL. Location. In Kent County, Delaware, flows easterly 7 miles, and empties into Delaware Bay about 32 miles above Cape Henlopen. Existing project. A channel 5 feet deep at mean low water from the 5-foot contour in Delaware Bay to the bridge at Little Creek Landing, 3 miles above the mouth, 60 feet wide across the bar outside the mouth and 40 feet in the river, including several cutoffs to eliminate sharp bends, which shortened the distance about .5 mile. Cost for new work for the completed project was $12,016. Existing project was adopted by 1912 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 626, 62d Cong., 2d Sess.). Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Three pile-and timber wharves or landings on this stream, which are considered adequate for the existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. None. Condition as of Sept. 30. Project was completed in 1914. 13. MANASQUAN RIVER, N.J. Location. This small stream flows in eastern part of New Jersey, rises near Freehold, flows easterly and empties into the Atlantic Ocean, about 26 miles south of Sandy Hook. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 795.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Report for 1909, page 186, and Annual Report for 1938, page 269. Existing project. A channel 14 feet deep and 250 feet wide, protected by jetties and other works, extending from the Atlantic 3-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 Ocean to inner end of north jetty, thence 12 feet deep and 300 feet wide to within 700 feet of New York and Long Branch Railroad bridge, thence of same depth and narrowing to 100 feet wide to within 300 feet of bridge; for a widening on northerly side of channel of 200 feet for 3,150 feet to a depth of 8 feet; for a 19-acre anchorage to 10 feet deep on south side of channel and for a 27.5-acre anchorage to 12 feet deep about 0.5 miles west of route 35 highway bridge. Section included in project is about 1.5 miles long. Mean tidal range is 3.7 feet at inner end of inlet and 4 feet at ocean end; mean range of spring tides, 4.4 and 4.8 feet, respectively; irregular fluctuations due to wind and barometric pressure vary from 2.7 feet below to 7.5 feet above mean low water at inner end of inlet. Project, excluding 10- and 12-foot anchorages, cost $518,243. Estimated cost (1958) for 10- and 12-foot anchorages portion of project considered inactive is $504,000. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. River and Harbor Act of 1945 provides that local interests must furnish lands and rights-of-way for construction and future maintenance and hold the United States free from damages. Assurances to date have been complied with. Terminal facilities. Five landings with a total wharfage of 700 feet used by commercial fishermen, and 7 landings and boat basins for pleasure craft. Existing facilities are considered adequate for present requirements. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Costs incurred were for plans and specifications. Rehabilitation, contract: Costs for major accomplishments were $1,962,389 rehabilitation of north jetty. Other costs incurred were for supervision and administration. Rehabilitation, hired labor: Major costs incurred were $48,035 jetty rehabilitation. Other costs incurred were for engineering and design and supervision and administration. Condition as of Sept. 30. Existing project was completed in June 1963. Dredging 19 acre anchorage south of channel and 27.5 acre anchorage west of highway bridge is in the inactive category. Costs under existing project, excluding $300,000 (new work) contributed funds expended, were $518,249 for new work $5,787,460 $2,978,979 $9,375,688. for major rehabilitation, and for maintenance, a total of 14. MISPILLION RIVER, DEL. Location. Rises in Kent and Sussex Counties, Del., flows northeasterly 15 miles along the boundary line between the two counties and empties into Delaware Bay about 16 miles above Cape Henlopen. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1218.) Previous projects. For details see page 1786, Annual Report for 1915, page 448 of Annual Report for 1918, and page 327 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For details see page 243 of Annual Report for 1957. Local Cooperation. Assurances required by 1954 River and Harbor Act have not been furnished. For details see page 243, Annual Report for 1957. Prior requirements fully complied with. Terminal facilities. For details see page 244, Annual Report for 1957. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance, contract: Dredging was performed during the period of 19 May 1981 through 29 July 1981. Removed a total of 150,000 cubic yards of material at a cost of $399,137. Maintenance, hired labor: Major costs incurred were $28,696 plans and specifications; $83,715 engineering surveys and supervision and administration. Other costs were for environmental monitoring. Condition as of Sept. 30. Project is about 31 percent complete. Four cutoffs for 6-foot channel were completed in 1923; 6-foot channel from Delaware Bay to Milford in 1924; and jetties at the mouth in 1939. Work remaining is dredging channel to 9-foot depth, 800 feet wide in Delaware Bay to the mouth, thence 60 feet wide to Milford, with the provision of three cutoffs to eliminate bends, and a turning basin at Milford. Controlling depths at mean low water: In October 1964 from Delaware Bay to mouth 7.1 feet, and thence to fixed highway bridge at Milford, 6.1 feet. Costs for existing project were $229,050 for new work, $253,491 for minor 3-10 PHILADELPHIA, PA., DISTRICT rehabilitation, and $1,179,057 for maintenance, a total of $1,661,598. 15. MURDERKILL RIVER, DEL. Location. Rises in Kent County, Del., flows northeasterly 19 miles through county, and empties into Delaware Bay about 25 miles above Cape Helopen. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 1218.) Existing project, Provides for a channel 7 feet deep at mean low water, 150 feet wide in Delaware Bay to mouth, and thence 80 feet wide to Frederica, 7.5 miles above mouth. Total length of section included in project is about 8.5 miles. Extreme tidal range is from about 1 foot below mean low water to about 2 feet above mean high water. Estimated cost for new work revised in 1954 is $38,000. Portion 'comprising widening channel to project width throughout its length is to be restudied and excluded from foregoing cost estimate. Estimated cost of this portion last revised in 1954 was $86,000. Project was authorized by River and Harbor Act of July 13, 1892 (H. Ex. Doc. 21, 52d Cong., 1st Sess.). (See page 981 Annual Report of 1892.) Latest published map is in House Document 1058, 62nd Congress 3d Session. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. There are a number of light timber wharves on both sides of river near mouth and two wharves at Frederica, all privately owned. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Costs incurred were for plans and specifications and environmental monitoring. Condition as of Sept. 30. Existing project about 30 percent complete, including revision to be restudied. Channel 7 feet deep and 60 feet wide was completed in 1911. Work remaining is widening the channel to project width. 16. NEW JERSEY INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY Location. A sea level inland water route approximately parallel with New Jersey coast, extends from Atlantic Ocean at Manasquan Inlet, about 26 miles south of Sandy Hook, N.J., to Delaware Bay about 3 miles above Cape May point. Waterway extends through inlet and up Manasquan River about 2 miles; thence by Point Pleasant Canal through high ground for 2 miles to head of Barnegat Bay. It then passes through a series of bays, lagoons, and thoroughfares along New Jersey coast to Cape May harbor; thence across Cape May County to Delaware Bay through a land cut by way of New England Creek basin. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 234, 795, 825, 826, 827, 1216, 1217, 1218, and 1219.) Existing project. This provides for a channel 12 feet deep at mean low water and generally 100 feet wide, extending from the Atlantic Ocean at Manasquan Inlet, N.J., to Delaware Bay above Cape May, N.J., by the further improvement of Manasquan River and Inlet, N.J., and the present New Jersey Intracoastal Waterway, and by the construction of a canal of similar dimensions from Cape May Harbor to Delaware Bay via the New England Creek basin, with adequate jetties at the Delaware Bay entrance. The total length of the project is about 117 miles. Normal tide range in sections of the waterway remote from inlets is 0.5 foot. Estimated cost for new work is $71,549 (July 1969), exclusive of $1,824,940 Navy Department funds and $99,000 contributed by local interests. Portion of project extending from Manasquan River to Cape May Harbor is to be restudied and excluded from new work costs estimate. Estimated cost of this portion is $6,470,000 (July 1954). Existing project was adopted by 1945 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 133, 76th Cong., 1st Sess.). Latest published map is in project document. River and Harbor Act of 1946 (Public Law 525, 79th Cong., 2d Sess., as extended by Public Law 240, 82nd Cong.), authorized use for a period not to exceed 6 years, of funds from appropriations heretofore or hereafter made for maintenance and improvement of rivers and harbors, for maintenance of canal from Cape May Harbor to Delaware Bay constructed as an emergency wartime project with Navy Department funds, including cost of maintaining temporary railroad and seashore highway bridges over canal. Local cooperation. The project is subject to the conditions that the State of New Jersey cede to the United States all right, title, and interest that it has acquired to lands, easements, rights-of-way, and structures other 3-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 than bridges for the Bayhead-Manasquan Canal; that the State of New Jersey furnish, free of cost to the United States, all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and disposal areas required for construction of the Cape May Canal and for improvement of the proposed waterway and for their subsequent maintenance; that local interests provide, maintain, and operate suitable bridges over the waterway; that the State of New Jersey donate to the United States the navigation aids in use on the present New Jersey Intracoastal Waterway; and that the State of New Jersey hold and save the United States and its agents free from any claims for damages resulting from the work of improvement. Compliance with these conditions was completed January 15, 1954, except that local interests are required to furnish disposal areas for the construction and the subsequent maintenance of the proposed improvement. Terminal facilities. See Annual Report for 1962. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance, contract: Costs for major accomplishments were $412,203 for dredging performed during the period of 1 October 1980 through 25 November 1980 and from 3 August 1981 through 30 September 1981. Removed a total of 237,100 cubic yards of material. Other costs incurred were for stream gaging. Maintenance, hired labor: Costs for major accomplishments were $283,977 engineering surveys, general maintenance and supervision and administration. Other costs incurred were for bulkhead study, preparation of reconnaissance report, bank stabilization, and plans and specifications. Condition as of Sept 30. Existing project is about 25 percent complete. A canal 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide from Cape May Harbor to Delaware Bay was completed in 1942; two parallel stone jetties at Delaware Bay entrance and a temporary highway and a railroad bridge in 1944, all with Navy Department funds. Work remaining, dredging a channel 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide from Atlantic Ocean at Manasquan Inlet to Cape May Harbor, has been deferred for restudy; however, the project between Ottens Harbor and Richardson Channel and from that point to Cape May are being maintained to 10 feet and 12 feet, respectively, since they were originally dredged to these depths by the State. 17. RACCOON CREEK, N.J. Location. Rises in Gloucester County, N.J., flows northwesterly 16 miles through the county, and empties into Delaware River about 20 miles below Philadelphia, Pa. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 295.) Previous projects. For details see page 1784, Annual Report for 1915, and page 344, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. A channel 7 .feet deep at mean low water, 75 feet wide, in Delaware River to the mouth and within the creek to Bridgeport, 13/4 miles above the mouth; thence 60 feet wide to Springers wharf, 5 miles above the mouth; and thence 40 feet wide to Swedesboro, 9 miles above the mouth. It also provides for a cutoff at Molonox Shoal, 7/2 miles above the mouth, and a stone-filled, pile-and-timber crib south jetty at the mouth, 950 feet long. Section included in the project is about 93/4 miles long. Mean tidal range at the mouth is 5.8 feet, and at Swedesboro 4.4 feet. Extreme tidal range is about 10 feet. Estimated cost (1913) for new work is $106,535, exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are three wharves of pile-and-timber construction, all privately owned. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was completed in 1922. Controlling depths at mean low water were 8.1 feet (Mar. 1965) from Delaware River to mouth; thence 7.9 feet (July 1964) to highway bridge at Bridgeport; thence 5.5 feet (Aug. 1964) to Swedesboro. Costs under the existing project were $83,665 for new work and $341,734 for maintenance, a total of $425,399. 18. SCHUYLKILL RIVER, PA. Location. Rises in Schuylkill County, Pa., flows generally southeasterly 150 miles, and empties into Delaware River at Philadelphia, Pa. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 295 and 280.) Previous project. For details see page 325, Annual Report for 1932. 3-12 PHILADELPHIA, PA.,DISTRICT Existing project. This provides for a channel 33 feet deep and 400 feet wide in Delaware River to the mouth and within the river to 29th Street, .75 mile above the mouth; thence the same depth and 300 feet wide to Passyunk Avenue Bridge, 3.5 miles above the mouth; thence 26 feet deep and 200 feet wide to Gibson Point, 4.5 miles above the mouth; and thence 22 feet deep and 200 feet wide to University Avenue Bridge, 6 miles above the mouth, including widening at bends. The total length of the section included in the project is about 6.5 miles. All depths refer to the plane of mean low water. The extreme tidal range, due to freshets and prolonged heavy winds, is about 14 feet. The cost for new work for the completed existing project was $2,809,007. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. The River and Harbor Act of July 24, 1946, imposed the condition that the city of Philadelphia agree to remove 60,000 cubic yards, place measurement, of material annually from that portion of those portions of the project which the District Engineer may designate until such time as adequate municipal sewage-treatment works are constructed and placed in effective operation. Compliance with this condition has been met through the completion of sewage-treatment works by the city of Philadelphia. All other requirements have been fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 38 wharves, piers, and docks within limits of improvement. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (For further details see Port Series No. 7-Revised 1967-Corps of Engineers.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance, contract: Costs for major accomplishments were $43,470 stream gaging. Dredging was performed during the period of 19 March 1981 through 15 May 1981. Removed a total of 177,200 cubic yards of material at a cost of $1,050,454. Maintenance, hired labor: Costs for major accomplishments were $40,271 plans and specifications and $92,780 engineering surveys, general maintenance, and supervision and administration. Condition as of Sept. 30. Existing project was completed in September 1962. For details see Annual Report for 1962. Costs under existing project were $2,809,007 for new work and $22,181,726 for maintenance, a total of $24,990,733. 19. WATERWAY FROM INDIAN RIVER INLET TO REHOBOTH BAY, DEL. Location. In southeasterly part of Sussex County, connects Rehoboth Bay with Indian River Bay by way of Big Ditch. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 1219.) Existing project. This provides for a channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide from water of 6-foot depth in Rehoboth Bay to water of the same depth in Indian River Bay by way of Big Ditch. The total length of the section included in the project is about 2.7 miles. The mean tidal range in the vicinity of the project in Rehoboth Bay is 0.5 foot; in Indian River Bay 0.9 foot. The extreme tidal range is from 1.5 feet below mean low water to about 2.5 feet above mean high water. Cost for new work for completed project was $90,908, exclusive of $20,000 contributed by local interests. Existing project was adopted by River and Harbor Act �of May 17, 1950 (H. Doc. No. 304, 81st Cong., 1st Sess.). The latest published map is in the project document. Local cooperation. The act authorizing the project provides that local interests shall give assurances satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army that they will (a) provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and suitable disposal areas for initial work and subsequent maintenance when and as required; (b) hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction and subsequent maintenance of the project, including such damages as may occur to public or leased oyster beds; and (c) make a cash contribution of $20,000 toward the construction of the project. Assurances of local cooperation were approved on February 27, 1956. Conditions of local cooperation have been complied with except that local interests are required to furnish suitable spoil-disposal areas for subsequent maintenance as required. Terminal facilities. There are no terminal or transfer facilities in the area that are fully open to public use. However, existing facilities that are available on a limited basis are adequate for the present demand, and can be expected to expand to meet future needs. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing channel was completed on July 7, 1956. Con- 3-13 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 trolling depth at mean low water in July 1970 was 4.8 feet. Costs under existing project, excluding $20,000 contributed funds expended for new work, were $90,908 for new work and $241,497 for maintenance, a total of $332,405. 20. WILMINGTON HARBOR, DEL. Location. Formed b3 rises in New Castle northeasterly 16 miles, Wilmington, Del., and River about 29 miles (See U.S. Coast and 294.) y Christina River, which County, Del., flows passing through city of empties into Delaware below Philadelphia, Pa. Geodetic Survey Chart Previous projects. For details see page 1785 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 308 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. This provides for a channel 35 feet deep and 400 feet wide from west edge of Delaware River ship channel to Lobdell Canal, a distance of about 1.2 miles; thence 21 feet deep and 250 feet wide for a distance of .8 mile to the mouth of Brandywine River; thence the same depth and 200 feet wide for a distance of about 2.2 miles to a point approximately 4.2 miles from the Delaware River ship channel; thence decreasing to a depth, of 10 feet in a distance of 750 feet to Penn Central Railroad bridge No. 4; and thence 7 feet deep and 100 feet wide for a distance of about 5.6 miles to Newport, Del., approximately 9.9 miles above the Delaware River ship channel, including a turning basin 35 feet deep opposite the Wilmington Marine terminal and extending upstream from the mouth to Lobdell Canal, 200 feet wide, 2,900 feet long on the north side of the channel and decreasing to a length of 2,000 feet on the north side of the basin. It also provides for the removal of about 1,200 feet of the outer end of a stone-filled, pile-and-timber crib jetty constructed 2,150 feet long on the north side of the entrance; for a steel sheet-pile jetty 2,300 feet long, with 120-foot inshore wing, on the south side of the entrance, and for a V-shaped stone-filled pile-and-timber jetty at the mouth of Brandywine River 430 feet along the north side of the Brandywine and 260 feet long on the Christina. All depths refer to the plane of mean low water. The extreme tidal range, due to prolonged heavy winds, is about 13 feet. (See Table 3-B at end of Chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 18 piers, wharves, and docks within improvement. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. (For further details see Port Series No. 8, revised 1966,-Corps of Engineers). Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance, contract: Costs for major accomplishments were $231,332 construct and raise banks. Other costs incurred were for environmental monitoring, and stream gaging. Dredging was performed during the period of 1 December 1980 through 18 March 1981 and from 4 September through 30 September 1981. Removed a total of 999,000 cubic yards of material at a cost of $1,058,000. Maintenance, hired labor: Costs for major accomplishments were $52,116 disposal area; $33,174 raise banks, $116,035 general maintenance, engineering surveys, and supervision and administration. Other costs incurred were for plans and specifications, environmental monitoring and steel sluices. Condition as of Sept. 30. Existing project was completed in 1962. (For details see page 222, Annual Report for 1962.) Total cost of existing project to Sept. 30, 1981 is $23,564,690 of which $1,552,604 is ror new work ($206,177 emergency relief funds and $1,346,427 regular funds), and $22,012,086 regular funds for maintenance. 21. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Table 3-E at end of chapter.) 22. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation Activities Pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (Preauthorization). Study Identification Assawoman Bay, Del (RECON) Cedar Creek, Sussex City, Del (DPR) Delran, N.J. (DPR) Petty Island, Back Channel, Camden, N.J. (DPR) Pleasantville, N.J. (DPR) River Front Park Marina, Toms River, N.J. (DPR) Little Assawomen Bay, Del (RECON) Fiscal Year Cost $ 4,613 21,680 51,547 11,001 36,700 -29 -- 4,476 3-14 PHILADELPHIA, PA., DISTRICT MITIGATION OF SHORE DAMAGE PURSUANT TO SECTION III, PUBLIC LAW 90-483 Study Identification Delaware River, Pennsville, N.J. Indian River Inlet, Del. Fiscal Year Cost $21,603 478 23. OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 3-F at end of chapter.) 24. BEACH EROSION CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Table 3-G at end of chapter.) FLOOD CONTROL LOCAL PROTECTION 25. DELAWARE COAST PROTECTION, DEL. Location. The project is located in Sussex County, Delaware, on the Atlantic Ocean and starts immediately south of Delaware Bay extending in a southerly direction a distance of 24.5 miles to Fenwick Island on the Delaware-Maryland border. Existing project. Provides a plan of imp ro vement which consists of the construction of dunes and beach fill; the construction of bulkheads at Rehoboth and Dewey beaches; periodic nourishment of the beaches; placement of sand fences; planting dune grass and maintenance and replacement of existing structures. (For details, see S. Doc. 90, 90th Cong., 2d Sess.) Estimated cost of project (October 1981) $53,000,000 includes $15,000,000 required non-Federal costs. Local cooperation. Assurances of local cooperation were provided by the State of Delaware, July 8, 1969. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work, hired labor; Engineering and design costs were $1,457. Condition as of Sept. 30. Work accomplished was engineering and design. 26. HAY CREEK, BIRDSBORO, SCHUYLKILL RIVER BASIN, PA. Location. The project is within the urban community of Birdsboro, Berks County, Pennsylvania, at the confluence of Hay Creek and Schuylkill River. The project starts at a point just below East Main Street in Hay Creek and extends upstream about 3,750 feet along Hay Creek to a point just above First Street. Existing project. The plan of improvement includes a 3,750 foot combination earth levee and concrete flood wall beginning at a point just below East Main Street and proceeding upstream approximately 900 feet above First Street. Included also are 2 new raised bridges to replace those at East Main Street and First Street and modification to an existing railroad bridge, as well as interior drainage facilities. Project was authorized in 1976 under the provisions of Section 201 of the Flood Control Act of 1965. Local cooperation. Assurances of local cooperation were received from the Borough of Birdsboro, Pennsylvania, in a letter dated 16 January 1973 which was signed by the Borough Manager. Continued interest in the project has been re-established in letter dated 13 September 1977. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work, hired labor: Costs for major accomplishments were $3,940 public involvement and coordination; $2,748 study management; $6,073 engineering and design and supervision and administration. Other costs incurred were for preparation of report, environmental studies economic study, investigations and survey and mapping. Condition as of Sept 30. Work accomplished was advance engineering and design. 27. POTTSTOWN AND VICINITY, SCHUYLKILL RIVER BASIN, PA. Location. The project is located in Pennsylvania along the Manatawny Creek and the Schuylkill River in the City of Pottstown, Montgomery County, and the communities of South Pottstown and Kenilworth, Chester County, Pennsylvania. Existing project. The physical construction will consist of channel improvements along the Schuylkill River and excavation of an area under an arch of the existing High Street bridge on the Manatawny Creek. The Schuylkill River channel will be widened to a width of 275 feet for a distance of about 7,600 feet. Stone protection will be provided along the channel where flow conditions require it. 3-15 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 Excavated material will be utilized to develop open space areas along the river. Estimated cost of the project (October 1981) is $4,100,000. Existing project was authorized in 1974 under Section 201 of the 1965 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. Local interests (the Borough of Pottstown, Pennsylvania) furnished assurances of local cooperation by letter dated 28 September 1970. The borough reaffirmed the assurances by a resolution dated 8 January 1973. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work, contract: Cost for major accomplishments were $18,408 economic studies; $3,033 cultural resources. New work, hired labor: Cost for major accomplishments were $35,636 hydraulic and hydrology investigations; $18,054 design and cost estimate; and $17,508 economic studies. Other costs incurred were for environmental studies, public involvement, study management, plan formulation and evaluation and engineering and design. Condition as of Sept. 30. Work accomplished was advance engineering and design. 28. TAMAQUA, PA. Location. The project is located in Tamaqua Borough and Walker Township, Pennsylvania. Both municipalities are within Schuylkill County. Existing project. The project will provide a 2,930 foot long tunnel, 10 feet in diameter with appurtenant structures, through Sharp Mountain. It will extend from Wabash Creek on the west boundary of Tamaqua to the Little Schuylkill River just south of its confluence with Wabash Creek. The proposed improvement includes an intake structure, a stilling basin, and a 70-foot long highway bridge. Estimated cost of project (October 1981) is $8,100,000 including $135,000 required non-Federal costs. Local cooperation. The Borough of Tamaqua is the local sponsor. The Borough, by letter of 25 June 1968, indicated its intention to comply with the items of local cooperation. The assurance was reaffirmed by the Borough on 2 September 1977. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work, contract: Cost incurred were for study management. New work, hired labor: Costs for major accomplishments were $9,612 investigations; $8,711 advance engineering and design, supervision and administration. Other costs incurred were for public involvement and coordination, study management, and material testing. Condition as of Sept. 30. Work accomplished was advance engineering and design. RESERVOIRS 29. BELTZVILLE LAKE, PA. Location. Damsite is on Pohopoco Creek about 4.5 miles upstream from its confluence with Lehigh River and 4 miles east of Lehighton, Pa. (See Geological Survey Quadrangle Map for Lehighton, Pa.-1960.) Existing project. A multiple purpose development project to provide water supply, flood control, and recreation. Plan of improvement provides for an earth and rock fill dam 4,500 feet long rising 160 feet above creekbed; a spillway around north end of dam; and gatecontrol outlet works discharging through a conduit on rock along right abutment. The lake, a unit of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes of Delaware River Basin, will have a reservoir capacity of 68,200 acre-feet at spillway crest level with 1,200 acre-feet of inactive storage, 40,000 acre-feet for water supply and recreation, and 27,000 acre-feet for flood control. (For details see H. Doc. 522, 87th Cong., 2d- Sess.) Design changes, based on planning to July 1965, indicate an earthfill dam 4,200 feet long rising 170 feet above creekbed, a controlled reservoir capacity of 68,250 acre-feet at spillway crest with 1,390 acre-feet of inactive storage, 41,220 acre-feet for water supply, water quality control and recreation. Estimated cost of project (July 1974) is $22,944,200 including $6,100,000 required non-Federal reimbursement for costs allocated to water supply storage during life of project after use of this storage is initiated; ultimate Federal cost is $16,100,000. Local cooperation. Project was approved subject to certain requirements of cooperation by local interests as defined in approved House Document. Resolution of Delaware River Basin Commission providing assurances of repayment 3-16 PHILADELPHIA, PA., DISTRICT of water supply and pollution control costs was accepted June 7, 1965. A contract for repayment of water supply costs was signed October 16, 1966. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance, contract: Costs for major accomplishments were $45,910 water quality report; $14,244 repair water quality system; $8,728 stream gaging; $8,610 operation and minor maintenance; $5,750 water quality testing. Other costs incurred were for gate repairs, and periodic dam surveys. Maintenance, hired labor: Costs for major accomplishments were $152,506 operation and minor maintenance, supervision and administration; $90,073 water control management; $21,735 hydraulic data collection; $22,564 repair water quality system; $35,335 gate repairs; $29,564 monitoring and $21,427 water quality, specific and joint use. Other costs incurred were for inclinometer readings, periodic inspections, annual dam survey, equipment maintenance and tower sealing. Condition as of Sept. 30. Project is about 99 percent complete. Acquisition of the necessary land is complete. 30. BLUE MARSH LAKE, PA. Location. Damsite is on Tulpehocken Creek about 1.5 miles upstream from its confluence with Plum Creek and about 6 miles northwest of Reading, Pa. (See Geological Survey Quadrangle Sheet, Bernville, Pa.) Existing project. A multiple purpose development project to provide supplies of water, flood control, and recreation. Plan of improvement provides for an earth and rock fill dam, 1,775 feet long and rising 98 feet above creekbed, with a spillway about 1,500 feet south of dam, and gate-controlled outlet works discharging through a conduit on rock along right abutment. The lake, a unit of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes of Delaware River Basin, will have a capacity of 50,010 acre-feet at spillway crest level, with 3,000 acre-feet of inactive storage, 14,620 acre-feet for water supply and recreation, and 32,390 acre-feet for flood control. (For details see H. Doc 522 87th Cong., 2d Sess.) Estimated cost of project (October 1979), $63,012,000 includes $16,132,000 required non-Federal reimbursement for costs allocated to water supply storage during life of project after use of this storage is initiated. Existing project was authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 522, 87th Cong., 2d Sess., contains latest published maps). Local cooperation. Project was approved, subject to certain requirements by local interests, as prescribed in House Document cited above. Delaware River Basin Commission on December 29, 1964, adopted a preliminary resolution providing for repayment of water supply costs. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work, contract: Costs for major accomplishments were $120,000 construction recreation facility; and $31,343 miscellaneous road work. New work, hired labor: Major costs incurred were $11,776 engineering and design and supervision and administration. Other costs incurred were for lab inspection, map survey and pumping plant survey. Maintenance, contract: Costs for major accomplishments were $29,284 lawn maintenance; $22,086 stream gaging; $20,017 sewage treatment plant; $15,706 drilling recreation area; $30,794 janitoral contract; and $15,889 fertilizer. Other costs incurred were maintenance of camp area, energy conservation and operation and maintenance. Maintenance, hired labor: Costs for major accomplishments were $47,515 recreation; $13,105 periodic inspection report, and supervision and administration. Other costs incurred were hydropower study, instrumentation and survey analysis, environmental testing and water control management. Condition as of Sept. 30. Continued normal operation and maintenance and management of recreation facilities. 31. FRANCIS E. WALTER DAM, PA. Location. Reservoir is in northeastern Pennsylvania on Lehigh River between White Haven and Stoddartsville. Dam is about 0.4 mile below mouth of Bear Creek, about 60 miles above confluence of Lehigh River and Delaware River at Easton, Pa. (See Geological Survey Quadrangle Sheet, Stoddartsville, Pa.) Existing project. Plan of improvement authorized by 1976 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 587, 3-17 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 79th Cong., 2d Sess.) provided far a single purpose flood control reservoir. Modification of project, authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 522, 87th Cong., 2d sess.), provides for a multiple-purpose development for water supply and recreation in addition to present singlepurpose flood control project. Plan of improvement requires altering spillway increasing height of dam, extending outlet tunnel by addition of a concrete conduit, and constructing new dikes and raising existing dikes. Modified dam will rise 263 feet above riverbed and be 3,500 feet long. Reservoir modification, a unit of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes of Delaware River Basin, will have a reservoir capacity of 180,000 acre-feet spillway crest level with 2,000 acre-feet of inactive storage, 70,000 acre-feet for water supply and recreation and 108,000 acre-feet for flood control. Estimated Federal cost of new work (October 1981) is $70,800,000 including $63,700,000 required non-Federal reimbursement for costs allocated to water supply storage during life of project after use of this storage is initiated. Local cooperation. None required under 1946 Flood Control Act. Under 1962 Flood Control Act, project was approved subject to certain requirements by local interests, as defined in House Document 522 cited above. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work, contract: Costs for major accomplishments were $18,255 cultural resource; $26,350 advance engineering and design; and $13,880 aerial photographs. Other costs incurred were water quality and sediment analysis. New work, hired labor: Costs for major accomplishments were $28,486 economic studies; $27,248 survey and mapping; and $47,080 study management. Other costs incurred were for public involvement, environmental studies, data collection, advance engineering and design and supervision and administration. Maintenance, contract: Costs for major accomplishments were $25,537 stream gaging. Other costs incurred were for operation and minor maintenance, dam survey, water testing and access road. Maintenance hired labor: Costs for major accomplishments were $129,547 operation and minor maintenance; and $54,000 installation of piezometers. Other costs incurred were for surveys, data analysis, inspections, engineering and design and supervision and administration. Condition as of Sept. 30. Project as authorized under the 1946 Flood Control Act was completed June 1961. Settlement for lands was completed October 1962. 32. GENERAL EDGAR JADWIN DAM AND RESERVOIR, PA. Location. In Dyberry Creek valley in central part of Wayne County, Pa., between borough of Honesdale and village of Tanners Falls. Dam is about 3 miles above confluence of Dyberry Creek and Lackawaxen River in Honesdale and 29 miles above confluence of Lackawaxen and Delaware Rivers. (See Geological Survey Quadrangle Sheet, Honesdale, Pa.) Existing project. A single-purpose flood control reservoir with a capacity of 24,500 acre-feet formed by an earth embankment, about 1,225 feet long at crest and rising 109 feet above creekbed. It also has a tunnel with intake structure and a chute-type spillway with a stilling basin in left abutment. Reservoir controls runoff from a drainage area of 65 square miles which is 91 percent of watershed of Dyberry Creek and 39 percent of Lackawaxen River watershed above Honesdale, Pa. Construction of project was authorized by 1948 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 113, 80th Cong., 1st Sess.). Federal cost of new work was $4,064,510. Non-Federal funds not required. Local cooperation. Assurances of compliance with requirements of local cooperation were accepted July 30, 1956. For details see page 251, Annual Report for 1962. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance, contract: Costs for major accomplishnents were $6,099 stream gaging. Maintenance, hired labor: Cost for major accomplishments were $19,570 reservoir operations and minor maintenance. Other costs incurred were for safety, periodic inspections, and supervision and administration. Condition as of Sept. 30. Project was completed in June 1960. 33. PROMPTON LAKE, PA. Location. In Lackawaxen River Valley in central part of Wayne County, Pa., between borough of Prompton and village of Aldenville. Dam is within corporate limits of Prompton, 4 3-18 PHILADELPHIA, PA., DISTRICT miles upstream from Honesdale, Pa., and approximately 30 miles above confluence of Lackawaxen and Delaware Rivers. (See Geological Survey Quadrangle Sheet, Honesdale, Pa.) Existing project. Plan of improvement authorized by 1948 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 113, 80th Cong., 1st Sess.) provide for a singlepurpose flood control reservoir. Modification of project authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 522, 87th Cong., 2d Sess.) provides for multiple-purpose development for water supply and recreation in addition to present single-purpose flood control project. Plan of improvement requires construction of a control tower with gates and service bridge, placing an impervious blanket on valley walls and floor upstream from dam, widening spillway, and clearing land and relocating roads in reservoir. Dam, completed under 1948 Flood Control Act which will not be modified, is 1,230 feet long and rises 140 feet above riverbed. Existing spillway, cut into rock of right abutment, will be modified and present uncontrolled outlet works discharging into a concrete conduit along right bank, will be provided with gates and a control tower. Reservoir modification, a unit of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes of Delaware River Basin has a capacity of 52,000 acre-feet; 3,500 acre-feet for inactive storage, 28,200 acre-feet for water supply and recreation, and 20,300 acre-feet for flood control. Estimated Federal cost of new work (October 1981) is $42,150,000 including $30,970,000 required non-Federal reimbursement for costs allocated to water supply storage during life of project after use of this storage is initiated. Local cooperation. Project modification was approved subject to certain requirements by local interests, as defined in House Document 522 cited above. Assurances of compliance under Flood Control Act of 1948 have been met. Delaware River Basin Commission on March 18, 1966, gave their view that the need for water supply is not urgent at this time. Study is continuing in order to resolve this question before completion of preconstruction planning. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance, contract: Costs for major accomplishments were $11,843 water control management, and testing; and $8,600 periodic dam survey. Maintenance, hired labor: Costs for major accomplishments were $39,820 reservoir operation and minor maintenance. Other costs incurred were hydropower study, inspections, inclinometer readings, slope deformation, engineering and design, supervision and administration. Condition as of Sept. 30. Project as authorized under the 1948 Flood Control Act was completed in November 1960. (For details, see page 358, Annual Report for 1963.) Work accomplished under the 1962 Flood Control Act was advance engineering and design. 34. TREXLER LAKE, PA. Location. Damsite is on Jordon Creek about 0.5 mile downstream from its confluence with Mill Creek and 8 miles northwest of Allentown, Pa. (See Geological Survey Quadrangel Sheet, W. Allentown, Pa.) Existing project. A multiple-purpose development project to provide supplies of water, flood control, and recreation. Plan of improvement provides for a concrete gravity type dam 800 feet long rising 120 feet above creekbed, a spillway in stream channel, and gate-controlled outlet works discharging through sluices in spillway section. The lake, a unit of the comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes of Delaware River Basin, will have a capacity of 39,000 acre-feet at spillway crest with 800 acre-feet of inactive storage, 24,200 acre-feet for water supply and recreation, and 14,000 acre-feet for flood control. (For details see H. Doc. 522, 87th Cong., 2d sess.) Estimated cost of project (October 1978), $47,500,000 includes $29,600,000 required non-Federal reimbursement for costs allocated to water supply storage during life of project after use of this storage is initiated. Existing project was authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 522, 87th Cong., 2d Sess., contains latest published map). Local cooperation. Project was approved subject to certain requirements by local interests, as prescribed in House Document cited above. The portion of assurances dealing with water supply requirements is being studied jointly by Delaware River Basin Commission and Lehigh- Northampton County Planning Commission. Condition as of Sept. 30. Some design work has been completed. Construction has not started. 3-19 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 35. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS To ascertain whether local interests were maintaining and operating completed projects as required, inspections were made as follows: Lehigh River at Allentown, Pa., 26 November 1980 and 27 April 1981; Lehigh River at Bethlehem, Pa., 18 November 1980 and 7 April 1981; Chester River at Chester Pa., 13 November 1980 and 7 April 1981; Rancocas Creek at Mt. Holly, N.J. 14 November 1980 and 9 April 1981; Delaware River at East Branch, N.Y., 6 November 1980 and 29 April 1981; Stroudsburg and East Stroudsburg; 11 May 1981 and Hawley, Pa., 13 May 1981. Local interests are satisfactorily maintaining and operating projects in accordance with regulation. Costs during the period were $6,237. Total costs were $78,616. 36. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 3-H at end of chapter.) 37. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 838, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization). Also feasibility study pursuant to Emergency Bank Protection Authority provided by Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act. (See Table 3-I at end of chapter.) Emergency flood control activities - repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation). Fiscal year costs were $110,799 for advance preparation and $5,729 for rehabilitation. 38. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS (See Table 3-D at end of chapter.) 39. SURVEYS Costs for the period were $520,093 for navigation studies; $847,799 for flood control studies; and $117,379 for special studies, a total of $1,485,271. 40. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Costs and expenditures during the period for flood plain information studies were $360,236. 41. SHORELINE EROSION CONTROL DEMONSTRATION Location. Demonstration projects will be undertaken at a total of 16 sites nationwide, 6 of which are located in the Delaware Bay and include Pickering Beach, Kitts Hummock, Slaughter Beach, Bowers Beach, Broadkill Beach, and Lewes, Delaware. The latter three sites will only be monitored as there are presently Federal and State projects in progress. Existing project. Section 54 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1974 authorized a nationwide, 5 year program to test and evaluate low cost shoreline erosion control measures, both structural and vegetative, which can be implemented by individual private property owners. The emphasis of the program is not to solve individual problems, so much as to explore the effectiveness of various ways to control erosion at different types of shorelines. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work, contract: Costs incurred were $14,999 prior year construction contract; and $19,976 information brochures. New work, hired labor: Costs incurred were $27,370 for monitoring and inspections, preliminary planning, erosion control and supervision and administration. Condition as of Sept. 30. Construction at all sites completed. 3-20 PHILADELPHIA, PA., DISTRICT COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Projects Funding .FY78 FY79 FY80 FY81 Sept. 30, 1981 1. Absecon Inlet, N.J. 2. Barnegat Inlet, N.J. 3. Cold Spring Inlet, N.J. ,4. Delaware River between Philadelphia, Pa. and Trenton, N.J. * 5. Delaware River Pa., N.J. and Del., Philadelphia to the Sea 6. Delaware River at Camden, N.J. 7. Harbor of Refuge Delaware say, Del. 8. Indian River Inlet and Bay, Del. * 9. Inland Waterway from Chincoteague Bay, Va. to Delaware Bay, Del. New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost - - - 534,209' - - -- 534,209' 179,000 8,000 24,400 9,000 5,789,3622 175,776 12,546 23,720 10,908 5,789,1992 - - - - 448,8493 - - - - 448,849 103,500 808,756 205,400 201,000 7,985,635 85,323 815,941 203,897 210,550 7,980,558 - - 879,275 - 879,275 15,000 121,000 84,900 -20,981 1,883,507 7,994 127,971 62,943 2,427 1,883,038 .- 1,134,346 - 1,134,346 .- 72,147,8004 .- 72,147,8004 1,109,000 174,350 400,500 3,240,000 22,085,7355 1,096,990 174,470 372,082 3,271,657 22,074,7225 .-.- 57,879,8726 .- 57,879,0286 8,844,181 11,860,244 14,897,900 13,908,163 232,473,779 8,783,238 11,877,621 14,850,493 13,957,353 232,406,448 .----- 508,324 - - - 508,324 - -- - 464,906 - - - - 464,906 - - 3,000 27,000 362,962 - - 2,615 27,222 362,799 - -.- 5,162,2301o -- 5,162,23010 - 721,000 531,555 13,000 1,139,45411 201,354 1,138,36311 -. 511,2108 - - - - 511,2108 25,000 133,000 836,200 403,000 2,753,923 12,491 129,182 795,533 442,491 2,736,421 - - - - 1,323,775 .- 1,323,775 6,500 6,877 5,000 3,800 - -154 - 1,177 168,41226 26 168,412 168,41226 98,36027 98,360 3-21 TABLE 3-A REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 3-A (continued) Se Se in COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 'ction Text Projects Funding FY78 FY79 FY80 FY81 Sept. 30, 1981 10. Inland Waterway, Rehoboth Bay to Delaware Bay, Del. 11. Inland Waterway from Delaware River to Chesapeake Bay, Del. and Md. 12. Little River, Del. 13. Manasquan River, N.J. * 14. Mispillion River, Del. 15. Murderkill River, Del. 16. New Jersey Intracoastal Waterway 17. Raccoon Creek, N.J. * 18. Schuylkill River, Pa. 24,000 40,000 48,400 29,971 35,100 53,407 32,193 8,930,000 9,207,729 394,000 412,481 12,826,000 12,871,902 2,949 8,140,300 7,173,706 561,5149 561,5149 81,400 1,149,978 80.925 1,149,002 26 8,508,000 9,472,669 132,808,591 12 132,532,301 12 106,755,530 13 106,563,667 13 New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 3,000 116,000 6,768 115,710 - 37,630 - 37,630 4,581 786,355 5,888 786,355 -- - - 71,54914 14 71,54914 707,000 616,500 721,000 889,000 15,218,471 1s 712,627 609,969 729,452 719,388 15,043,480 15 - - - - 1,196,581 - - - - 1,196,581 - - - 83,665 25 - - -83,665 25 - - 23,000 -1,539 341,734 - - 21,461 - 341,734 ..- 3,334,007 16 -- 3,334,007 16 666,000 992,000 -71,000 1,225,000 22,183,933 663,456 998,355 -74,182 1,226,976 22,181,726 3-22 - - - - 12,016 - - -- 12,016 - 20,000 300 -452 288,310 - 11,362 8,486 - 288,310 - - 557,249 21 .-- 557,24921 630,000 110,000 89,700 -169 2,982,362 22 629,493 100,576 107,234 172 2,981,033 22 - 660,000 2,555,000 3,640,000 7,410,600 28 - 621,963 2,346,583 2,263,314 5,787,460 28 --- - 377,848 23 - - - - 377,848 23 - 30,000 40,000 518,000 1,252,586 24 312 30,186 32,068 520,638 1,240,229 24 - - - - 253,491 -- - - 253,491 102,000 97,215 PHILADELPHIA, PA., DISTRICT TABLE 3-A (continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Projects Funding FY78 FY79 FY80 FY81 Sept. 30, 1981 19. Waterway from New Work Indian River Inlet Approp. To Rehoboth Bay, Del Cost 20. Wilmington Harbor, Del. 25. Delaware Coast Protection, Del. 26. Hay Creek, Birdsboro, Schuylkill River Basin, Pa. 27. Pottstown and Vicinity, Schuylkill River Basin, Pa. * 28. Tamaqua, Pa. 29. Beltzville Lake, Pa. * 30. Blue Marsh Lake, Pa. 31. Francis E. Walter Dam Pa. 32. General Edgar Jadwin Dam and Reservoir, Pa. 33. Prompton Lake Pa. 34. Trexler Lake, Pa. Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost - - 200,74 -- 200,4: 1,135,000. 1,438,800 2,129,5 1,099,459 1,499,867 2,126,1 890,000 -47 940,056 33,130 5,6C 80,000 135,305 100,0 69,354 139,339 84,4 14,372 101,785 -36 250,000 150,000 184,466 174,195 - 90,908 - 90,908 -249 241,497 241,497 - - 1,954,72517 _ 1,954,725 00 1,603,300 22,030,26718 42 1,593,509 22,012,086 - - 1,428,953 )0 1,457 1,428,904 00 50,000 365,305 25 22,178 315,296 _ 125,000 487,336 118,140 480,477 75,000 70,911 - 100 - 267,500 279,000 405,800 248,006 288,510 387,020 12,050,000 6,648,900 700,000 9,520,284 8,944,290 1,085,782 42,000 298,000 704,600 41,899 227,892 685,710 346,500 234,000 226,500 244,992 224,838 247,578 51,000 46,310 60,000 64,402 55,100 56,066 206,000 135,0Q0 154,400 185,363 151,430 151,749 - -14,700 -32,357 78,831 42 - - 525,000 35,149 513,472 - 22,931,831 - 22,931,130 539,000 2,562,975 532,531 2,510,741 169,000 63,180,300 179,688 63,136,247 674,000 1,739,900 673,539 1,649,936 376,000 11,503,43219 282,652 11,410,08419 320,000 2,973,521 299,741 2,934,627 - 4,073,105 - 4,073,105 49,400 931,364 46,295 927,608 - 4,609,48320 - 4,609,469 116,000 1,445,816 121,186 1,425,378 - 1,316,464 - 1,316,464 *Totals adjusted to correct discrepancies in prior years. 3-23 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 1. Includes $226,497 for new work for previous projects. 2. Includes $235,786 for maintenance for previous projects. 3. Excludes $300,000 contributed funds. 4. Includes $2,489,173 for new work, for previous projects, $105,000 for preauthorization studies and minus $142,015 adjustment (new work) to Delaware River, Philadelphia to Sea project from this project under the 1954 modification. 5. Includes $552,720 for maintenance for previous projects. 6. Excludes $12,976,058 for new work for previous projects and $142,015 adjustment from Delaware River, Philadelphia to Trenton, N.J. under 1954 modification. 7. Includes $1,025,409 for maintenance of previous projects. 8. Excludes $10,000 for previous project and $210,000 contributed funds. 9. Excludes $60,000 contributed funds. 10. Includes $2,749,452 for new work for previous projects. 11. Excludes $1,089 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, fiscal year 1963. 12. Includes $10,709,755 for new work for previous pro iects. 13. Includes $6,903,748 for maintenance for previous projects. 14. Excludes $1,824,940 Navy Department Funds and $99,000 contributed funds expended for new work. 15. Excludes $286,953 Navy Department funds expended for maintenance. 16. Includes $525,000 for previous projects. 17. Includes $402,121 for new work for previous project. 18. Excludes $60,000 contributed funds expended for maintenance. 19. Includes $40,000 appropriated and expended under Code 710 Recreation Facilities. 20. Includes $74,000 appropriate and $66,498 expended under Code 710 Recreation Facilities. 21. Includes $39,000 for new work for previous projects. Excludes $300,000 contributed funds expended on new work. 22. Includes $2,054 for maintenance for previous projects. 23. Includes $148,798 for new work on previous projects. 24. Includes $61,172 for maintenance on previous projects. 25. Includes $757 new work funds expended on previous projects. 26. Entire amount expended on previous project repealed in 1905. 27. Excludes $2,000 contributed funds and includes $25,330 for maintenance for previous projects. 28. Includes $555,600 for previous project. TABLE 3-B Acts Sept. 22, 1922 July 24, 1946 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 July 24, 1946 March 2, 1907 March 2, 1945 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 19352 Aug. 30, 19352 Aug. 26, 1937 July 24, 1946 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized ABSECON INLET, N.J. (See Section 1 of Text) An inlet entrance channel 20 feet deep. A channel 15 feet deep into Clam Creek and a turning basin. BARNEGAT INLET, N.J. (See Section 2 of Text) An 8-foot depth through inlet to Oyster Creek Channel across inner bar, 10-foot depth through outer bar and for jetties. A channel of suitable hydraulic characteristics from gorge to Oyster Creek Channel, and thence to deep water in bay. Maintenance dredging of channel to connect main inlet channel with Barnegat City Harbor. COLD SPRING INLET, N.J. (See Section 4 of Text) An inlet channel 25 feet deep and jetties. A 20-foot channel to deep water in harbor DELAWARE RIVER BETWEEN PHILADELPHIA, PA., AND TRENTON, N.J. (See Section 6 of Text) A channel 28 feet deep, 300 feet wide between Allegheny Ave., Philadelphia, Pa. and Delair Bridge. Channel 25 feet deep from Delair Bridge to Trenton, N.J., and maintenance of 12-foot channel from upper end of 25-foot project to Penn Central R.R. Bridge at Ferry St., Trenton. Auxiliary channel, 20 feet deep east of Burlington Island. A cross channel 8 feet deep, opposite Delanco, N.J. Anchorage at mouth of Biles Creek Documents H. Doc. 375, 67th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 504, 79th Cong., 2d sess.1 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 19 73d Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 85 74th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 358, 79th Cong., 2d sess.1 H. Doc. 388, 59th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 262, 77th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 3, 71st Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 11, 73d Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 66, 74th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 90, 74th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 679, 79th Cong., 2d sess. 3-24 TABLE 3-A (continued) ------- TABLE 3-B (continued) Acts PHILADELPHIA, PA., DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized Sept. 3, 1954 June 25, 1910 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 19353 June 20, 19384 Mar. 2, 19455 Mar. 2, 1945 s Mar. 2, 1945 s Sept. 3, 1954 July 3, 1958 June 3, 18 36 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 July 25, 1912 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 A channel 40 feet deep and 400 feet wide between Allegheny Ave., Philadelphia, Pa., and upstream end of Newbold Island, thence 35 feet deep to Trenton Marine Terminal and turning basin to 800 feet wide. Relocate channel at railroad bridge at Delair and suitably reconstruct bridge. Construct necessary bank protection works; and eliminate authorized anchorage near mouth of Biles Creek, Pa. DELAWARE RIVER, PA., N.J., AND DEL., PHILADELPHIA TO THE SEA (See Section 7 of Text) Channel 35 feet deep from Allegheny Ave., Philadelphia, Pa., to Delaware Bay. Anchorages 35 feet deep at Port Richmond and Mantus Creek, a 30 foot anchorage at Gloucester, N.J., and extend 1,000 foot channel in Philadelphia Harbor to Horseshoe Bend. An anchorage 35 feet deep at Marcus Hook, Pa. A channel 37 feet deep from Philadelphia-Camden Bridge to Navy Yard, thence 40 feet deep to deep water in Delaware Bay. A 37-foot depth n channel from Allegheny Ave., Philadelphia, Pa., to Philadelphia-Camden Bridge and in anchorage at Port Richmond. A 37-foot depth in an enlargement of anchorage near Mantua Creek and Marcus Hook. Maintain enlarged channel opposite Philadelphia Navy Yard. A channel from Allegheny Ave., to Naval Base 40 feet deep, 400 feet wide along west side of channel through Philadelphia Harbor and 500 feet wide through Horseshoe Bend. Anchorages at Reedy Point, Deepwater Point, Marcus Hook, and Mantua Creek 40 feet deep and 2,300 feet wide with mean lengths of 8,000, 5,200, 13,650 and 11,500 feet respectively. HARBOR OF REFUGE, DELAWARE BAY, DEL. (See Section 7 of Text) Breakwater construction Construction of 10 ice piers Construction of 5 additional ice piers Channel 18 feet deep to Queen Anne pier at Lewes, Del. (no work has been done on this channel). Channel 15 feet deep to pier of Atlantic Fisheries Co. about 0.7 mile east of Queen Anne pier. INDIAN RIVER INLET AND BAY, DEL. (See Section 9 of Text) A 15-foot inlet channel, steel and stone jetties, 6 foot channel from end of inlet channel to deep water in the bay and authority to modify interior inlet channel. A 9-foot channel from inlet to Old Landing, including basin, and 4-foot channel to highway bridge at Millsboro INLAND WATERWAY, REHOBOTH BAY TO DELAWARE BAY, DEL. (See Section 10 of Text) For a 6-foot depth canal to connect Rehoboth Bay and Delaware Bay. For a 6-foot depth entrance near Lewes, for jetties, for widening the canal from Broadkill River to Lewes, and basin. For a 10-foot depth from Delaware Bay to Lewes and in basin, and for extneding jetties.6 H. Doc. 358, 83d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 733, 61st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 304, 71st Cong., 2d sess.l Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 5, 73d Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 159, 75th Cong., 3d sess. H. Doc. 580, 76th Cong., 3d sess. H. Doc. 340, 77th Cong., 1st sess.1 Specified in Act. H. Doc. 358, 83d Cong., 2d sess.l H. Doc. 185, 85th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 112, 53d Cong., 1st sess. (subproject, approved by War Department, Apr. 23, 1900). (Subproject, approved by War Department, June 30, 1902.) Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 15, 70th 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 56, 74th Cong., 1st sess. River and Harbors Committee Doc. 41, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 330, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 823, 60th Cong., 1st sess. and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 51, 61st Cong., 3rd sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 56, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 344, 77th Cong., I1st sess. 3-25 Documents REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 3-B (continued) Acts AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 7, 1939 Sept. 3, 1954 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 June 13, 1902 Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 2, 1919 Aug. 8, 1917 July 3, 1930 July 24, 1946 INLAND WATERWAY FROM DELAWARE RIVER TO CHESAPEAKE BAY, DEL. AND MD. (See Section 12 of Text) A sea level channel 27 feet deep, 250 feet wide from Delaware River to Elk River and 400 feet wide down Elk River and Chesapeake Bay to deep water at or near Pooles Island; alter existing bridges over canal; enlarge Delaware City Branch Channel to 8 feet deep and 50 feet wide, with a basin same depth, and revetment of both banks east of Fifth Street; enlarge anchorage and mooring basin in Back Creek to 400 feet wide, 1,000 feet long and 12 feet deep; extend jetties at Reedy Point; and construct bulkheads. Construct a 4-lane high-level fixed highway bridge at or near St. Georges. A channel 35 feet deep and 450 feet wide from Delaware River through Elk River and Chesapeake Bay at water of that depth in the bay, including a cutoff at Penn Central Railroad crossing, with a minimum radius of curvature of 7,000 feet at bends; a high level fixed railroad bridge over cutoff; high level fixed highway bridge at Reedy Point and Summit; and an anchorage in Elk River 35 feet deep and 1,200 feet wide, averaging 3,700 feet long. MANASQUAN RIVER, N.J. (See Section 13 of Text) Channel 8 feet deep and provision of works designed to secure channel. Widening channel on northerly side. Deepening channel to 12 and 14 feet, 10 and 12 foot anchorages. RACCOON CREEK, N.J. (See Section 16 of Text) A channel of 7-foot depth to Springers wharf and 5 feet to Swedesboro. A cutoff, Molonox Shoal A 7-foot depth extension to Swedesboro and jetty at mouth SCHUYLKILL RIVER, PA. (See Section 19 of Text) Depths of 35 feet from mouth to Girard Point, thence 30 feet, 26 feet, and 22 feet to University Avenue Bridge, Philadelphia. A depth of 30 feet instead of 35 feet between the mouth and the conditional restoration and maintenance of the channel below Passyunk Ave., by the United States. A depth of 33 feet from the channel in Delaware River to Passyunk Ave., restoration of the project channel dimensions between Passyunk Ave., and University Ave., and full maintenance of the entire project. WILMINGTON HARBOR, DEL. (See Section 20 of Text) Depths of 21, 10, and 7 feet and jetties. Purchase or construct a dredge and auxiliaries including a wharf and depot, and maintenance of project. Entrance channel and basin with 25-foot depth and construction by local interests of new south jetty. A 30-foot depth between Delaware River and Lobdell Canal and modification or removal of a portion of north jetty. 3-26 Documents H. Doc. 201, 72d Cong., 1st sess. and Rivers and Harbors Committee Does. 18 and 24, 73d Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 310, 76th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 123, 83d Cong., 2d sess.t H. Doc. 482, 70th Cong., 2d sess. Senate Committee Doc., 74th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 356, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 231, 56th Cong., 1st sess., and Annual Report 1900, p. 1590. Specified in act. H. Doc. 800, 63d Cong., 2d sess., (contains latest published maps.) H. Doc. 1270, 64th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 40 71st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 699, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 66, 54th Cong., 1st sess. Annual Report, 1896, p. 973; Annual Report 1897, p. 1250.1 H. Doc. 359, 62d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 114, 67th Cong., 1st sess. and S. Committee Print, 68th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 20, 71st Cong., 2d sess. June 3, 1896 July 25, 1912 Sept. 22, 1922 Mar. 3, 1925 July 3, 1930 __ PHILADELPHIA, PA., DISTRICT TABLE 3-B (continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Aug. 30, 19358 Completion of new south jetty by the United States; subject to Rivers and Harbors Cornprovision that city of Wilmington reimburse the United States mittee Doc. 32, 73d for cost, without interest, of any part of structure that may Cong., 2d sess. subsequently be occupied and utilized for city activities. Oct. 17, 1940 Permit temporary occupancy by city of Wilmington of any part of H. Doc. 658, 76th Cong., south jetty for city activities under revocable license, provided 3d sess. occupied portion of jetty is properly maintained without expense to the United States. July 14, 1960 A 35-foot depth between Delaware River ship channel and Lodbell S. Doc. 88, 86th Cong., Canal including turninb basin of same depth, opposite Wilmington 2d sess. Marine Terminal, 200 feet wide, 2,900 feet long on north side of channel, and 2,000 feet long on north side of basin. 1. Contains latest published maps. 5. Channel 37 feet deep and 600 feet wide from 2. Also Public Works Administration, September 6, Philadelphia-Camden Bridge to Allegheny Avenue, de- 1933, and Emergency Relief Administration, May 28, ferred for restudy. 1935. 6. Extension of jetties considered to be inactive. 3. Also Public Works Administration, September 6, 7. The 10 and 12 foot anchorages are considered 1933. inactive. 4. Channel 37 feet deep and 600 feet wide from 8. Also May 28, 1935, under Emergency Relief Naval Base to Philadelphia-Camden Bridge, deferred for Administration. restudy. TABLE 3-C TOTAL COST FOR EXISTING PROJECTS TO SEPTEMBER 30, 1981 See Section in Text Project Funds New Work Maintenance Rehabilitation Totals 4. Delaware River be- Public Works $2,189,956 - - $ 2,189,956 tween Philadelphia, Emergency 2,636,4 56 - - 2,636,4 56 Pa., and Trenton Relief N.J. Regular 64,727,215 $ 21,380,782 - $ 86,107,997 Totals $69,553,627 $ 21,380,782 - 90,934,409 5. Delaware River, Pa., Public Works 813,046 - - $ 813,046 N.J. and Del., Regular 44,089,923 $230,640,602 $508,324 275,238,849 Philadelphia Totals $44,902,969 $230,640,602 $508,324 276,051,895 to the Sea TABLE 3-D RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS (See Section 38 of Text) Project Date Survey Conducted Pepper Creek, Del. 24 March 1981 Lewes and Rehoboth Canal, Del. 29 May 1981 3-27 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 OTHER AUTHO] Project Absecon Creek, N.J.' Alloway Creek, N.J.' Appoquinimink River, Del. Aquatic Plant Control Big Timber Creek, N.J. 1 Broadkill River, Del. Chester River, Pa.3 Cohansey River, N.J. Cooper River, N.J.1 Delaware River, N.Y., N.J., and Pa., at or near mouth of Neversink River4 Dennis Creek, N.J. 1 Double Creek, N.J.1 Goshen Creek, N.J.1 Ice Harbor at Marcus Hook, Pa. 1'6 Ice Harbor at New Castle, Del.1 '6 Leipsic River, Del.' Little Egg Harbor, N.J. 1 '4 Little River, Del. Mantua Creek, N.J. Maurice River, N.J. Channel 8 feet deep, Delaware Bay to mouth 9 Delaware Bay to Millville Oldmans Creek, N.J. Pepper Creek, Del.1 Rancocas River, N.J. St. Jones River, Del. Delaware Bay to Lebanon"1 1 1 Jetties and new entrance at mouth 9 Salem River, N.J. Delaware River to fixed bridge1 2 Penns Neck Bridge to fixed bridge' 4 Schuylkill River above Fairmount Dam, Pa.1 Smyrna River, Del. Delaware River to Wharf at Smyrna Landing' s Wharf at Smyrna Landing to fixed bridge 9 Toms River, N.J. Channel 5 ft. deep Channel 12 feet deep 9 Tuckerton Creek, N.J. Woodbury Creek, N.J.' TABLE 3-E 1917 1897 1912 1905 1928 1898 1931 1980 1966 1948 1941 1965 1942 1961 1961 1955 1949 1950 1972 1940 RIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Co Full Report See Annual Report For Coi 1969 1931 1931 1975 1962 1976 1931 1938 ] 1962 4,701 7,800 15,359 208,964 224,704 36,956 15,048 12,016 169,6878 143,98410 31,188 138,094 44,500 207,102 107,63413 4,291,810 198,844 870 14,336 32,345 288,310 339,340* 137,050 32,125 1,797* 13,090 66,093 i,792* 288,987 5 197,327 10,050 33,311 60,242 623,917* 27,09316 56,474 3-28 st To September 30, 1981 Operation and nstruction Maintenance 11,935 167,682* 21,398 35,761 36,973 41,270 87,594 - 58,6652 53,986* 68,228 243,641 6,000 1,139 146,75617 745,931 33,102 379,244* PHILADELPHIA, PA., DISTRICT OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS 1. Completed. 2. Excludes $50,000 contributed funds expended for new work. 3. Includes $6,000 new work and $63 maintenance funds expended on previous projects. 4. Abandonment recommended in House Document 467, 69th Congress, 1st Session. 5. Maintenance assumed by local interests. 6. Harbor not now required by commerce. 7. Last appropriation for project was in 1852. No information is at hand relative to work done. 8. Includes $3,000 for new work for previous projects. 9. Deferred. 10. Includes $43,000 new work funds expended on previous projects. 11. Includes $54,590 new work on $28,935 maintenance funds expended on previous projects. 12. Includes $55,809 new work and $48,000 maintenance funds expended on previous projects. 13. Exclusive of $51,825 contributed by local interests. 14. Deferred. Dredged under previous project to 9 foot depth. 15. Includes $55,085 new work and $22,723 maintenance funds expended on previous projects. 16. Includes $2,950 new work funds expended on previous projects. 17. Includes $36,000 for new work for previous projects. *Operation and maintenance figure includes cost incurred for preparation of environmental impact statements. TABLE 3-F OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS (?C: Section 22 of Text) For Last Cost To September 30, 1981 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Atlantic City, N.J. 1972 2,083,289 Barnegat Light, N.J. 1964 70,908 Cape May City, N.J. 1961 22,9572 Long Beach Island, N.J. 1964 40,665 North Wildwood, N.J. 1961 Ocean City, N.J. 1969 395,8313 Rehoboth Beach to Indian River Inlet, Del. 1965 326,116 Stone Harbor, N.J. 1961 Ventnor, Margate and Longport, N.J. 1961 1. Operation and maintenance required by law to 3. Excludes cost of $1,146,325 to local interests be assumed by local interests, and $272,766 Federal participation expended under 2. Excludes $58,585 Accelerated Public Works Public Works Acceleration Program for Extension of five funds expended for extension to two groins, existing groins completed 11 May 1964. TABLE 3-G BEACH EROSION CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION' (See Section 23 of Text) Project Fiscal Year Cost Broadkill Beach, Sussex County, Del. $185,117 Lewes, Delaware 232,207 Port Mahon, Delaware 53,367 1. Beach erosion control activities pursuant to Section 103, Public law 87-874 (Preauthorization). 3-29 TABLE 3-E (continued) TABLE 3-H REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost To September 30, 1981 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Allentown, Lehigh River, Pa. 1961 1,615,581 -1 Aquashicola Reservoir, Pa.2 1963 - - Bethlehem, Pa. 1966 4,520,995 -1 Maiden Creek Reservoir, Pa.2 1963 - - Mt. Holly, N.J. 1946 283,665 _1 Tocks Island Lake, Pa., N.J. and N.Y. 1979 65,106,260 - Tocks Island (Relocation of U.S. Route 209 only) Pa. 1979 195,223 - 1. Maintenance assumed by local interests as re- 2. New project deferred. quired by authorizing project. TABLE 3-I FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION' (See Section 37 of Text) Study Fiscal Year Cost Millcreek, Bucks County, Pa. $ 14,371 Monocacy Creek, Bethlehem, Pa. 108,933 Woodlynne, N.J. 79,859 1. Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 838, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization). FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION2 (See Section 37 of Text) Study Fiscal Year Cost Darby Creek, Landsdowne, Pa. $19,364 Kaempfer Brook, Liberty, N.Y. 41 Mill Creek, Lower Southampton Township, Pa. 4,490 2. Feasibility study pursuant to emergency bank protection, provided by Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act. 3-30 BALTIMORE, MD., DISTRICT* This district comprises the watershed of Susquehanna River and its tributaries from headwaters in south central New York State through central Pennsylvania to its mouth in Chesapeake Bay; watershed of the Potomac River and its tributaries from headwaters in Maryland, eastern West Virginia, and northern Virginia to its mouth in Chesapeake Bay; District of Columbia; and southwestern portion of Delaware. It includes that portion of Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries north of Smith Point, Md., on western shore of the bay, and includes that portion of Maryland between Chesapeake Bay and Atlantic Ocean. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Baltimore Harbor and Channels, Md. andVa....................... 4-2 2. Baltimore Harbor, Md., Collection and Removal of Drift............... 4-3 3. Black Walnut Harbor, Md .................. 4-3 4. Chester River, Md. ........................ 4-3 5. Duck Point Cove, Md. ................... 4-4 6. Harbor of Baltimore, Md., Prevention of Obstructions and Injurious Deposits .......... 4-4 7. Herring Bay & Rockhold Creek, Md. ........... 4-4 8. Honga River and Tar Bay (Barren Island Gaps), Md ................... 4-5 9. Island Creek, St. Georges Island, Md........... 4-5 .0. Knapps Narrows, Md. ..................... 4-5 11. Little Wicomico River, Va................... 4-5 12. Ocean City Harbor and Inlet and Sinepuxent Bay, Md....................... 4-6 13. Monroe Bay and Creek, Va................... 4-6 14. Neale Sound, Md. ........................ 4-6 15. Potomac and Anacostia Rivers, D.C., Collection and Removal of Drift ............... 4-7 16. Rock Hall Harbor, Md..................... 4-7 17. Slaughter Creek, Md....................... 4-7 18. St. Catherines Sound, Md. .................. 4-7 19. St. Jeromes Creek, Md.................... 4-8 20. Tilghman Island Harbor, Md................. 4-8 21. Twitch Cove and Big Thorofare, Md. ........... 4-9 22. Washington Harbor, D.C. .................. 4-9 23. Wicomico River, Md....................... 4-9 24. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys ........ 4-10 25. Other Authorized Navigation Projects ......... 4-10 26. Navigation work under special authorization ............................. 4-10 Beach Erosion Control 27. Colonial Beach, Va. ..................... 4-10 28. Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects .......................... 4-10 Flood Control 29. Bloomington Lake, Md. and Va. .............. 4-10 30. Bull Run, Pa ........................... 4-11 31. Cumberland, Md., and Ridgeley, W. Va......... 4-11 32. Fourmile Run, Va....................... 4-12 33. Lackawanna River Basin, Pa. .............. 4-12 33A. Aylesworth Creek Lake, Pa ................ 4-12 Flood Control (Cont'd) Page 34. Raystown Lake, Raystown Branch, Juniata River, Pa.......................... 4-12 35. Southern New York Flood Control Projects ........................ 4-12 35A. Addison, N.Y ............................. 4-13 35B. AlmondLake, N.Y ......................... 4-13 35C. Arkport Dam, N.Y ........................ 4-13 35D. Avoca, N.Y .............................. 4-13 35E. Binghamton, N.Y.......................... 4-13 35F. Canisteo, N.Y............................ 4-14 35G. Corning, N.Y........................... 4-14 35H. East Sidney Lake, N.Y. .................... 4-14 351. Elmira, N.Y. ............................ 4-15 35J. Hornell, N.Y ............................. 4-15 35K. Lisle, N.Y ............................... 4-15 35L. Oxford, N.Y. ............................ 4-15 35M. Whitney Point Lake, N.Y.................... 4-16 35N. Whitney Point Village, N.Y.................. 4-16 36. Stillwater Lake, Lackawanna River, Pa......... 4-16 37. Susquehanna River Flood Control Project, N.Y. and Pa. ....................... 4-16 37A. CowanesqueLake, Pa...................... 4-16 37B. Tioga-Hammond Lakes, Pa. ................. 4-17 38. West Branch of Susquehanna River, Pa......... 4-17 38A. AlvinR. Bush Dam, Pa..................... 4-17 38B. Curwensville Lake, Pa.................... 4-17 38C. Foster Joseph Sayers Dam, Pa. .............. 4-18 39. Wyoming Valley, Pa....................... 4-18 40. York, Codorus Creek, Pa.................... 4-18 41. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ................ ........ . 4-18 42. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations ............................... 4-18 43. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ................................. 4-19 44. Flood Control Work under Special Authorization . ......... ................. 4-19 Water Supply 45. Potomac Estuary Pilot Water Treatment Plant, D.C....................4-19 46. Washington Aqueduct ................... 4-19 General Investigations 47. Surveys ................................. 4-20 48. Collection and Study of Basic Data ............ 4-20 *All cost and financial statements and authorizing legislation for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. Additionally, all tables which are referenced in text appear at the end of this chapter. 4-1 - REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 1. BALTIMORE HARBOR AND CHANNELS, MD. AND VA. Location. Baltimore Harbor is at head at navigable portion of Patapsco River about 12 miles from Chesapeake Bay. The Patapsco River rises near town of Westminster in Carroll County, Md., and flows generally southeast for about 65 miles to enter Chesapeake Bay. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12278). Previous project. For details see page 274 of Annual Report for 1963. Existing Project. a. A uniform main channel depth of 50 feet between Cape Charles, Va., and Fort McHenry at Baltimore, Md., with dimensions as follows: (1) Cape Henry Channel: 50 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide from the 50-foot depth curve in the Atlantic Ocean to that depth in Chesapeake Bay, a distance of 2.3 miles; (2) York Spit Channel: 50 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide connecting the 50-foot depth curves in Chesapeake Bay near York Spit, a distance of 18.2 miles; (3) Rappahannock Shoal Channel: 50 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide connecting the 50-foot depth curves in the Chesapeake Bay opposite the Rappahannock River, a distance of 8.9 miles; and (4) Baltimore Harbor Approach Channels: 50 feet deep and generally 800 feet wide, widened at the approach and bends, from the 50-foot depth curve in Chesapeake Bay opposite the mouth of the Magothy River to Fort McHenry on the Patapsco River, a distance of 19.9 miles. b. Branch channels with dimensions as follows: (1) Connecting Channel to Chesapeake and Delaware Canal Approach Channel: 35 feet deep, 600 feet wide, and 13.0 miles long from the Cutoff-Brewerton Angle in the main channel to the 35-foot depth curves in the natural channel on the east side of Chesapeake Bay which is part of the inland waterway from Delaware River to Chesapeake Bay. The channel includes the Brewerton Extension and Swan Point and Tolchester Sections; (2) Curtis Bay: 50 feet deep, 600 feet wide, and 2.3 miles long from the main channel to and including a turning basin at the head of Curtis Bay; (3) Curtis Creek: (a) a channel, 35 feet deep and generally 200 feet wide, from the 50-foot channel in Curtis Bay to 750 feet downstream of the Pennington Avenue Bridge; (b) a channel, 22 feet deep and generally 200 feet wide, from the 35-foot channel to and along the marginal wharf of the Curtis Bay Ordnance Depot; (c) an irregular shaped 3-acre basin, with a depth of 18 feet, adjacent to the head of the 22-foot channel; (d) a basin, 15 feet deep and 450 feet wide, from the end of the 22-foot channel to the end of the marginal wharf; and (e) a channel, 22 feet deep and 200 feet wide, from the 22-foot channel south of the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Bridge to the vicinity of Arundel Cove, a distance of 2,800 feet, thence 100 feet wide in Arundel Cove for a distance of 2,100 feet, with an anchorage basin, 700 feet square, adjacent to the channel and southwest of the wharf of the Coast Guard Depot at Curtis Bay; (4) Middle Branch: (a) Ferry Bar East Section: a channel, 42 feet deep and 600 feet wide, from the main channel at Fort McHenry to Ferry Bar, a distance of 1.4 miles; (b) Ferry Bar West Section: a channel, 35 feet deep and 400 feet wide, from the Ferry Bar East Section to Ferry Bar, a distance of 0.8 miles; (c) Spring Garden Section: a channel, 27 feet deep and 250 feet wide, from Ferry Bar to and including a turning and anchorage basin immediately below the Western Maryland Railway Bridge, a distance of 1.0 mile; and (5) Northwest Branch: Federal maintenance of 39-foot or 35-foot deep channels after either depth has been provided by local interest: (a) East Channel: a channel, 49 feet deep, 600 feet wide, and 1.0 miles long with a turning basin at the head of the channel from that depth existing at the time of construction; and (b) West Channel: a channel, 40 feet deep, 600 feet wide, and 1.2 miles long with a turning basin at the head of the channel from that depth existing at the time of construction. c. The following anchorages: (1) Quarantine Anchorage: 35 feet deep, 3,500 feet long, and 600 feet wide; (2) Riverview Anchorage No. 2: 30 feet deep, 2,400 feet long, and 1,300 feet wide; (3) Riverview Anchorage No. 1: 35 feet deep, 4,500 feet long, and 1,500 feet wide; and (4) Fort McHenry Anchorage: 35 feet deep, 3,500 feet long, and 400 feet wide. The mean range of tide is 2.8 feet at the Cape Henry Channel, 2.3 feet at the York Spit Channel, 1.4 feet at the Rappahannock Shoal Channel, 0.8 foot at the Craighill Entrance, 0.9 foot in the Cutoff Section, 1.1 feet at Fort McHenry, and 1.2 feet at Pooles Island in the upper Chesapeake Bay. Depths refer to mean low water. Estimated cost for new work is $490,780,000 which includes: $8,330,000 for completed work through the River and Harbor Act of 1945; $62,200,000 (October 1980 prices) for work authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1958 of which $57,900,000 is Corps of Engineers, $60,000 is U.S. Coast Guard and $4,240,000 is non-Federal; and $420,250,000 (October 1981 prices) for work authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1970, of which $334,000,000 is Corps of Engineers, $250,000 is U.S. Coast Guard, and $86,000,000 is non-Federal. Widening 35-foot depth from Port Covington Channel from 150 to 400 feet to Ferry Bar, widening 27-foot depth channel from 150 to 250 feet to Hanover Street Bridge, and providing a channel 27 feet deep by 250 feet wide to Western Maryland Railway Bridge with an anchorage and turning basin at upper end is considered inactive and excluded from foregoing estimate. Estimated cost (1954) of this portion is $1,603,000. Local cooperations. Fully complied with for improvements authorized under River and Harbor Act of 1945 and prior acts. River and Harbor Act of 1958 requires local interests furnish lands, rights-of-way, and spoil disposal area for construction and future maintenance, hold the United States free from damages, and provide and maintain all necessary alterations in sewer, water supply, drainage, and other utilities. Local interests gave formal assurance that terms will be complied with. River and Harbor Act of 1970 requires local interest to: (a) provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way required for construction and subsequent maintenance of the project and for aids to navigation upon request of the Chief of Engineers, including suitable areas determined by the Chief of Engineers to be required in the general public interest for initial and subsequent disposal of dredged material and necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads, and embankments therefor, or the costs of such retaining work; (b) hold and save the United States free from damages that may result from the construction and maintenance of the project; (c) provide and maintain at local expense adequate public terminal and transfer facilities open to all on equal terms, and depths in berthing areas and local access channels serving terminals commensurate with the depth provided in the related project area; (d) accomplish without cost to the United States such utility and other relocations or alterations as necessary for project purposes; (e) prohibit erection of any structure within 125 feet of the project channel or turning basin; and (f) establish regulations prohibiting discharge of pollutants into the waters of the channels, and harbor by users thereof, which regulations shall be in accordance with applicable laws or regulations of Federal, State, and local authorities responsible for pollution prevention and control. Local interests have furnished assurances that terms will be complied with. 4-2 BALTIMORE, MD. DISTRICT Terminal facilities. The Port of Baltimore has 45 miles of waterfront of which 25 miles are industrially developed. There are 94 covered and open overseas piers for the loading and discharging of 173 ships, providing 84 general cargo, 65 specialized cargo, and 24 public bulk cargo berths. The existing ground storage is equivalent to 53,700 railroad cars of cargo. There are 31 public general merchandise warehouses, with 4.9 million square feet of storage space and 4.7 million cubic feet of cold storage space. Eight ship-building, ship repair, and ship dismantling yards are available for handling up to 90 vessels. The three grain elevators in the port have a capacity of about 13 million bushels. Latest description of terminal facilities is in "Port Series No. 10 (revised 1978)" on Port of Baltimore, Md., (issued by Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors). Operations and results during fiscal year. New work. Dredging to widen the southerly approaches to the C&D Canal (Swan Point and Tolchester Channels), by contract, began November 2, 1980 and was completed May 4, 1981. A total of 1,392,247 cubic yards of material was removed and deposited in an approved open water disposal area at a cost of $5,117,477. Preconstruction planning continued on work authorized by the 1970 River and Harbor Act. Maintenance, Baltimore District: Maintenance dredging of the inbound side of the Craighill Angle, by contract, continued on January 1, 1981 and was completed on February 17, 1981. A total of 637,157 cubic yards of material was removed and deposited in an approved open water disposal area at a cost of $1,193,910. Maintenance dredging of the outbound sides of the cutoff angle and Craighill angle, by contract, began on December 27, 1980 and was completed on May 8, 1981. A total of 924,517 cubic yards of material was removed and deposited in an approved open water disposal area at a cost of $2,731,012. Maintenance, Norfolk District: Condition surveys were performed of the Cape Henry Channel in October 1980 and the York Spit Channel in January 1981. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project as authorized by 1945 River and Harbor Act and prior acts was completed in March 1954 except for inactive portion. Norfolk District undertook jurisdiction of the channel in York Spit Section in fiscal year 1942 and the channels in Cape Henry and Rappahannock Shoal Sections in fiscal year 1961. Project as authorized by 1958 River and Harbor Act is 87 percent complete. Work within the Baltimore District is 81 percent complete. The work remaining to be done is dredging the Connecting Channel to the C&D Canal. Work within the Norfolk District on Cape Henry, York Spit and Rappahannock Shoal Sections was completed in March 1967. Preconstruction planning was initiated in October 1976 on the project as authorized by 1970 River and Harbor Act and continued in FY 1981. Total costs for existing project were $63,191,475 of which $35,519,422 was for new work and $27,672,053 was for maintenance. 2. BALTIMORE HARBOR, MD. COLLECTION AND REMOVAL OF DRIFT Location. Project applies to Baltimore Harbor, Md., and its tributaries. Existing project. Provides for collection and removal of drift from Baltimore Harbor and its tributary waters, and authorizes Secretary of the Army to allot such amounts as may be necessary for work from appropriations for maintenance and improvement of existing river and harbor works or other available appropriations, and that this work shall be carried as a separate and distinct project. It is wholly a work of maintenance. Purpose of work is to afford relief from variable conditions of obstruction. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. See report for Baltimore Harbor and Channels, Md. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operations, by hired labor, consisted of collection and disposal of 23,760 cubic feet of driftwood, ranging from small blocks up to timbers of large dimensions. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project is one of the continuous maintenance. Navigation has been made safer by continued patrol of the harbor and removal of drift material which began in July 1949. 3. BLACK WALNUT HARBOR, MD. Location. A large tidal cove on east side of Chesapeake Bay at south end of Tilghman Island near entrance to Choptank River, about 50 miles south of Baltimore, Md. It is about 4,500 feet long. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1225.) Existing project. Channel 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide to and including an anchorage basin of same depth 400 feet square. Mean range of tide is about 1.4 feet. Greater fluctuations are caused by prolonged high winds on Chesapeake Bay. Harbor is well sheltered except from the south. Cost of new work for completed project was $32,631. Local cooperation. Complied with except local interests are to furnish spoil-disposal areas for future maintenance. Terminal facilities. A few small timber wharves at Fairbank, one of which is publicly owned. Similar facilities exist at Bar Neck. There is also a small marine railway and boat-repair yard on Barney Cove, the western prong of the harbor. Sufficient areas are available for erection of additional terminals, if required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design in connection with the proposed fiscal year 1982 maintenance dredging was completed in September 1981. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was completed in August 1949. 4. CHESTER RIVER, MD. Location. Rises in Kent County, Del., flows 50 miles generally southwesterly and empties into Chesapeake Bay. Kent Island Narrows is a passage connecting Chester River and Eastern Bay. Wells Cove is an indentation on easterly side of Kent Island Narrows about 0.4 mile south of highway bridge crossing the Narrows. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 548 and 1226.) Previous project. For details see page 262 of Annual Report for 1960. Existing project. Provides for a channel 6 feet deep at mean low water and 60 feet wide from Crumpton to Jones Landing, section included in project is about 5.5 miles long, lower end of the section being about 37 miles above mouth of river; for a 4-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 channel 7 feet deep at mean low water and 75 feet wide from Chester River to Eastern Bay through Kent Island Narrows; and a channel 7 feet deep at mean low water and 75 feet wide extending from 7-foot deep curve in Kent Island Narrows 800 feet into Wells Cove with a basin of same depth and 300 feet square at head of Channel. Mean range of tide is 2.4 feet. Cost of new work for completed project was $32,454, exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects. Widening 7-foot deep channel from 75 to 100 feet from Chester River to Eastern Bay through Kent Island Narrows is considered inactive and excluded from foregoing estimate. Local cooperation. Fully complied with except local interests are to furnish spoil disposal areas for future maintenance of Wells Cove section of project. Terminal facilities. There are two bulkhead wharves on Chester River section. Facilities on the Kent Island Narrows section of the existing project consist of about 10,000 linear feet of timber pile bulkheaded wharf. About 1,350 linear feet of the wharf is owned and operated by the Queen Anne's County; the remainder is privately owned. The privately owned bulkheaded wharf is operated mostly by the 7 marinas located on the Narrows with the remainder being owned and operated by the seafood packing houses in the area. In addition to the slips of the marinas, there are marine railways, launching ramps, and travel-lifts. All of these facilities are in good condition, and are located adjacent to the proposed improvements. In Wells Cove there is a small wharf, a small marine railway, and a public landing. All facilities are privately owned except the public landing on Wells Cove. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging in the Long Point section of the channel, by contract, began in April 1981 and was completed in May 1981. A total of 39,840 cubic yards of material was removed at a cost of $235,231. Condition at end of fiscal year. Active portion of existing project was completed in 1950. Total costs of existing project were $1,131,206 of which $32,454 was new work and $1,098,752 for maintenance. 5. DUCK POINT COVE, MD. Location. A small indentation about 4,000 feet long on east shore of Fox Creek, about 2.5 miles above mouth. Fox Creek is a shallow tidal estuary about 4 miles long entering Honga River about 4 miles above its junction with Hooper Strait, which, in turn, connects with Chesapeake Bay on east side, at a point about 15 miles north of mouth of Potomac River. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1224.) Existing project. A channel 60 feet wide and 6 feet deep, from that depth in Fox Creek to a mooring basin of same depth, 100 feet wide and 300 feet long, roughly parallel to county road at head of waterway. Cost of new work for completed project was $25,289. Local cooperation. Complied with except local interests must, for future maintenance, hold the United States free from damages to oyster beds and furnish spoil-disposal areas. Assurances were accepted by the Chief of Engineers October 26, 1949. Terminal facilities. There are three privately owned packinghouse wharves on north bank of Duck Point Cove which are open to the public for transaction of business with the owners. Facilities are adequate for present needs. The commissioners of Dorchester County indicated that a public terminal would be built. Sufficient areas are available for construction of additional terminals if, and when, necessary. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design in connection with the proposed fiscal year 1982 maintenance dredging was completed in September 1981. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was completed October 1950. 6. HARBOR OF BALTIMORE, MD. PREVENTION OF OBSTRUCTIONS AND INJURIOUS DEPOSITS. Location. Project applies to tidal waters of the harbor of Baltimore and its adjacent and tributary waters, and all tidal waters of Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries within State of Maryland. Existing project. Continuous patrol and inspection of Baltimore Harbor, Chesapeake Bay, and its tributaries to prevent and detect violations of the River and Harbor Act of June 29, 1888, Sections 10 and 13 of the River and Harbor Act of March 3, 1899, Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and other related Federal laws. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operations, by supervisor of Harbor of Baltimore, included: 1,200 inspections; 201 detailed investigations of violations of Federal laws with cease and desist orders issued in all cases; 128 cases sent to U.S. Attorney for further action; and 158 cases were closed. Fines in the amount of $3,500 were imposed. Condition at end of fiscal year. Work under existing project began in July 1959 and is one of continuing operation and maintenance. 7. HERRING BAY AND ROCKHOLD CREEK, MD. Location. Herring Bay is a wide-mouthed indentation on the west side of Chesapeake Bay about 20 miles below Annapolis, Md. It is about 3 miles long from north to south and penetrates the shore for a depth of about 1 mile. Rockhold Creek, which is about 2.5 miles long, is an estuary which extends northward from the northerly end of Herring Bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1225.) Existing project. Provides for channel 7 feet deep and 60 feet wide from 7-foot contour in Herring Bay to vicinity of county wharf on Rockhold Creek, with turning basin of same depth, 100 feet wide and 150 feet long at head of channel, and a stone breakwater approximately 900 feet long east of entrance channel. Mean range of tide is about 1.5 feet and extreme tidal range about 4 feet. The Federal cost of new work for completed project was $50,591. Local cooperation. Fully complied with except local interests are to furnish disposal areas for future maintenance as needed. Terminal facilities. Consists of a public wharf on Rockhold Creek about 600 feet below the county bridge, open to all, together with a few private landing stages. No freight-handling devices are installed on any of the wharves which are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: A condition survey was made of the Herring Bay and Rockhold 4-4 BALTIMORE, MD. DISTRICT Creek area at a cost of $5,075. A maintenance dredging contract was awarded on August 24, 1981 to restore the project channel to its authorized dimensions, work has not begun. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was completed in March 1940. Total costs of existing project were $201,805 of which $50,591 was for new work and $151,214 for maintenance. 8. HONGA RIVER & TAR BAY (BARREN ISLAND GAPS), MD. Location. Honga River is a tidal estuary of Chesapeake Bay and penetrates Dorchester County on Eastern Shore of Maryland between Hooper Islands and the mainlands; Tar Bay lies between Barren Island and the mainland and Hooper Islands. Fishing Creek connects Tar Bay and Honga River. Back Creek is a branch of Honga River extending into Hooper Islands, the mouth is about 2 miles south of Fishing Creek. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1224.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 60 feet wide and 7 feet deep at mean low water from 7-foot contour in Chesapeake Bay, through Tar Bay and Fishing Creek to 7-foot contour in Honga River, 25,300 feet long, and a channel in Back Creek 7 feet deep and 60 feet wide from 7-foot depth curve in Honga River to a point near head of Back Creek with a turning basin of same depth 150 feet long and 200 feet wide at head of channel, about 5,500 feet long. Mean range of tide is about 1.4 feet. Federal cost of new work for completed project was $66,119. Local cooperation. Fully complied with except that local interests are to furnish spoil disposal areas for future maintenance as needed. Terminal facilities. Numerous small private wharves are scattered along Fishing Creek and Back Creek. A public wharf is on Fishing Creek. A public wharf, 4 oyster houses, and a marine railway are on Back Creek. Facilities are adequate for existing and reasonably prospective commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: A condition survey was made of the entire Honga River area at a cost of $2,081. A maintenance dredging contract was awarded on August 26, 1981 to restore the project channel to its authorized dimensions, work has not begun. A contract for vegetative establishment of the dredged material was awarded on September 18, 1981. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete. The channel from Chesapeake Bay, through Tar Bay and Fishing Creek to Honga River was completed in November 1935 and the channel and turning basin in Back Creek was completed in April 1956. 9. ISLAND CREEK, ST. GEORGES ISLAND, MD. Location. Island Creek in St. Marys County, Md., is a tidal estuary three-fourths of a mile long, flowing in a southeasterly direction and entering the right bank of St. Marys River at its junction with the Potomac River, 11 miles upstream of the Chesapeake Bay and 97 miles downstream from Washington, D.C. It lies entirely within the lower half of St. Georges Island. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 557.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 5 feet deep, 50 feet wide, and 2,000 feet long from the St. Marys River through the entrance to Island Creek and a turning basin 5 feet deep, 200 feet wide, and 500 feet long within the creek. The plane of reference is mean low water. The tidal ranges are: Mean, 1.5 feet; irregular, 2.5 feet; and extreme, approximately 7 feet. Costs of Federal new work for the completed project were $6,230. Local cooperation. Fully complied with except local interests are to furnish spoil disposal areas for future maintenance as needed. Terminal facilities. On Island Creek there are five small private landings or stagings which are considered adequate for present commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous costs in connection with maintenance dredging contract which was completed October 30, 1979. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was completed in May 1956. 10. KNAPPS NARROWS, MD. Location. A small channel separating Tilghman Island from mainland of eastern shore of Chesapeake Bay about 40 miles south of Baltimore, Md. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1225.) Existing project. A channel 9 feet deep at mean low water, 75 feet wide, widened at the bends from deep water in Chesapeake Bay to deep water in Harris Creek, Md. Mean range of tide is 1.4 feet. Cost of new work for completed project was $46,121. Existing project channel was authorized by the Public Works Administration, September 16, 1933, and later adopted by 1935 River and Harbor Act. Local cooperation. Complied with except local interests must furnish spoil disposal areas as needed for future maintenance. Terminal facilities. A bulkhead wharf exists on each side of the southerly abutment of the bridge across the Narrows. There are several small-boat landings within the Narrows and several marine railways for repairing boats of a few feet in draft. A bulkhead landing is available for public use at the turning basin. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design in connection with the proposed fiscal year 1982 maintenance dredging was completed in September 1981. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was completed in April 1935. 11. LITTLE WICOMICO RIVER, VA. Location. A tidal estuary 6 miles long in Northumberland County, Va., flowing southeasterly to Potomac River, which it enters on right bank one-half mile upstream of its mouth and about 108 miles downstream from Washington, D.C. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 557.) Existing project. A channel 8 feet deep, 150 feet wide, and 4,800 feet long, extending from deep water in Potomac River to deep water in Little Wicomico River; two stone jetties, extending to 8-foot contour in Potomac River; and bulkhead walls from inner ends thereof extending sufficiently into Little Wicomico River to stabilize the dredged inner Channel. Plane of reference is mean low water. Tidal ranges in Potomac River at entrance are: Mean 1.2 feet; irregular, 2.5 feet; and extreme, 4-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 about 7 feet. Mean tidal range within the river is about 1 foot. Federal cost of new work for completed project was $81,885, exclusive of $5,000 contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Two wharves open to the public and numerous small wharves and stagings for private use, an oyster shucking and packing plant, and a marine railway and boatbuilding yard. Facilities are considered adequate for present commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design in connection with proposed rehabilitation of the south timber bulkhead and with proposed maintenance dredging of the project channel continued. A condition survey was made of the Little Wicomico area at a cost of $390. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was completed in December 1937. 12. OCEAN CITY HARBOR AND INLET AND SINEPUXENT BAY, MD. Location. Ocean city is on a barrier island between Sinepuxent Bay and Atlantic Ocean about 35 miles south of entrance to Delaware Bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1220.) Existing project. This provides for an inlet channel 300 feet wide and 16 feet deep from the 16-foot depth curve in Atlantic Ocean through the inlet to the channel in the Isle of Wight Bay, protected on the south side by a stone jetty with a top elevation of 6 feet above mean low water and a top width of 12 feet, and on the north side by a stone jetty with a top elevation of 9 feet above mean low water and a top width of generally 20 feet, thence generally 200 feet wide and 16 feet deep to the project harbor; a depth of 14 feet and 150 feet wide to the head of the harbor, a length of approximately 3,400 feet; a channel 6 feet deep and 150 feet wide in Sinepuxent Bay from the inlet to Green Point, and thence 100 feet wide in Chincoteague Bay; and for a channel 6 feet deep and 125 feet wide from the inlet channel to a point opposite North Eighth Street in Ocean City, thence 75 feet wide into the Isle of Wight Bay. Depths in the inlet channel and harbor refer to project datum. Depths in the bay channels refer to mean low water. The elevation of mean low water in the bays above mean low water in the ocean at Ocean City varies from about 0.8 foot in the vicinity of the inlet to 1.7 feet at their heads. The mean range of ocean tide is 3.4 feet. The extreme range is from 3 feet below mean low water to about 3.5 feet above mean high water, a total of 9.9 feet. In the hays the mean range of tide varies from approximately 2.5 feet at the inlet to 0.3 foot at their heads. Greater fluctuations are caused by prolonged high winds. Federal cost of new work for completed project was $1,190,530, exclusive of $500,000 contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. Fully complied with except local interests must furnish spoil disposal areas for future maintenance as needed. Terminal facilities. On bay side of Ocean City: two storage basins, for pleasure and small commercial craft, and numerous privately owned pile-and-timber piers and bulkhead wharves. At project harbor: a public landing about 1,000 feet long, several privately constructed bulkhead wharves open to the public for transaction of business with the owners, and a boat repair yard with a marine railway capable of handling boats up to about 150 tons. All piers and wharves are accessible by highway. Terminal facilities for channel across Sinepuxent Bay to Assateague Island termini of channel. Adequate timber bulkhead landing at both South Point and Assateague Island termini of channel. Port facilities have been expanded to include all available space in the Fish Harbor. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging of the Inlet Harbor, and Isle of Wight Bay, by contract, began December 17, 1980 and was completed March 12, 1981. A total of 81,510 cubic yards of material was removed and deposited on an upland disposal site and beach at a cost of $488,669. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was completed in 1936. 13. MONROE BAY AND CREEK, VA. Location. Monroe Bay is an indentation on the right bank of Potomac River in Westmoreland County, Va., 34 miles upstream of Chesapeake Bay and 75 miles downstream from Washington, D.C. Monroe Creek is a tidal stream 5 miles long which flows southerly and discharges into Monroe Bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 558.) Existing project. A channel 8 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and 950 feet long, through the bar at the entrance, and within the creek a channel 7 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and 2,500 feet long, with turning and anchorage basin 500 feet wide at upper end in vicinity of Colonial Beach waterworks. The mean range of tide is 1.6 feet. Cost of new work for completed project was $12,460. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are numerous wharves and landings in the creek, of which 3 are open to the public. There are two marine railways. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design in connection with the proposed fiscal year 1982 maintenance dredging was initiated. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was started in March and completed in April 1931. 14. NEALE SOUND, MD. Location. A tidal estuary of Wicomico River, Charles County, Md., near the junction of Potomac and Wicomico Rivers, 38 miles upstream of Chesapeake Bay and 70 miles downstream from Washington, D.C. Neale Sound is 1.5 miles long and flows southeasterly parallel with Potomac River, from which it is separated by Cobb Island and a marshy barrier shore which is breached in a number of places. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 558.) Existing project. A channel 7 feet deep and 100 feet wide through lower entrance into Wicomico River and a second channel 6 feet deep at upper entrance extending from deep water within the sound through a marshy barrier at head of Cobb Island to deep water in the Potomac with widths of 60 feet within the sound and 80 feet elsewhere. Mean range of tide is 1.9 feet. Cost of new work for completed project was $12,600, exclusive of $1,000 contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. Fully complied with except local interests are to furnish releases from damages and spoil disposal areas for future maintenance as required. Terminal facilities. Four wharves open to the public, numerous small privately-owned wharves and stages and two 4-6 BALTIMORE, MD. DISTRICT small marine railways are located on the waterway. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design in connection with the proposed fiscal year 1982 maintenance dredging was completed in June 1981. A maintenance dredging contract was awarded on September 15, 1981 to restore the project channel to its authorized dimensions, work has not begun. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was started in January and completed in February 1939. 15. POTOMAC AND ANACOSTIA RIVERS, D.C. COLLECTION AND REMOVAL OF DRIFT Location. Project applies to the Potomac and Anacostia Rivers, Washington, D.C. and their tributaries. Existing project. Collection and removal of drift from the waters of the Potomac and Anacostia Rivers and their tributaries in the Washington Area from the head of tidewater to Mount Vernon, Va. Total length of project, considering both sides of the waterway, is about 50 miles. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. See report for Washington Harbor, D.C. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operations by hired labor consisted of collection and disposal of 132,840 cubic feet of driftwood, ranging from small blocks up to timbers of large dimensions. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project is one of continuous maintenance. Navigation has been made safer by continued patrol and removal of drift material which began in July 1966. 16. ROCK HALL HARBOR, MD. Location. Shallow, open cove on east side of Chesapeake Bay immediately to the south of Swan Point and 23 miles southeast of Baltimore, Md. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 548 and 1226.) Previous project. For details see page 279 of Annual Report for 1957. Existing project. Provides for a channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide from 10-foot depth curve in Swan Creek Inlet to a channel of same dimensions, 700 feet long parallel to harbor terminals at Rock Hall; an anchorage basin of the same depth, 100 feet wide, 250 feet long in a northwesterly extension of the channel fronting the harbor terminals; an anchorage basin 8 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and 350 feet long on an extension of the center line of the 10-foot basin; with an anchorage basin 8 feet deep, 200 feet wide and 600 feet long attached to and extending in a southwesterly direction from the west end of above mentioned 8-foot basin; with twin breakwaters at the harbor entrance. On May 29, 1980, the Chief of Engineers under authority provided by Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended, authorized construction of the following work: Raising the existing west and east breakwaters from four feet to seven feet above mean low water and extending the west breakwater 400 feet at an elevation of seven feet above mean low water; relocating the existing entrance channel at a depth of 8 feet and width of 100 feet; a new channel 8 feet deep and 100 feet wide, from the new entrance channel to the existing anchorage basin; a new channel, 8 feet deep and 100 feet wide, from the end of the existing channel near the County wharf to and including an anchorage basin, 250 feet square, in the eastern end of the harbor. The estimated first cost of this work is $1,759,000, of which $1,110,000 is Federal cost and $649,000 is required local cash contribution. In addition, local interests contributed $66,000 for the retaining dike, bulkheads, and embankments. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for work authorized under River and Harbor Acts of 1937 and 1948, except that local interests are to furnish spoil disposal areas for future maintenance as needed. For work authorized by the Chief of Engineers May 29, 1980, local interests must, among other requirements, provide without cost to the United States all necessary lands, easements, and rights-of-way required for construction and subsequent maintenance of the project and contribute, in cash, 36.9 percent of the first cost and all project costs in excess of the Federal cost limitation of $2,000,000, to be paid in a lump sum prior to start of construction, or in installments prior to start of pertinent work items. For details see page 4-9 of Annual Report for 1979. Terminal facilities. There are several private terminals, a marine railway, a public timber-pile wharf, and a public bulkhead wharf about 500 feet long. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: A contract for dredging and breakwater construction was awarded March 30, 1981 and is 25 percent complete. Condition at end of fiscal year. Work authorized under River and Harbor Acts of 1937 and 1948 was completed in August 1956. Total costs for existing project were $740,311, of which $674,985 was for new work and $65,326 was for maintenance. 17. SLAUGHTER CREEK, MD. Location. This is a waterway about 8 miles long and tidal throughout connecting with Little Choptank River 5 miles from its mouth. It lies in Dorchester County, Md., between Taylors Island and the mainland of the eastern shore of Chesapeake Bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1225.) Existing project. This provides for dredging a channel 7 feet deep and 100 feet wide at mean low water through the bar at the mouth, a distance of about one-third of a mile, the lower end of the section extending about 900 feet into Little Choptank River. The mean range of tide is about 1.5 feet and the extreme tidal range is 2.9 feet. The cost for new work, made in 1911, is $4,140. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. There is one solid bulkhead wharf about 300 feet long, served by this improvement. It is privately owned but open to general public use, and is considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: A condition survey was made of the Slaughter Creek area at a cost of $2,578. A maintenance dredging contract was awarded on September 9, 1981 to restore the project channel to its authorized dimensions, work has not begun. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was completed in 1913. 18. ST. CATHERINES SOUND, MD. Location. St. Catherines Sound, a tidal estuary of the Potomac River, is in St. Marys County, Md. It is situated near 4-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 the junction of the Potomac arid Wicomico Rivers, 34 miles upstream of the Chesapeake Bay, and 76 miles south of Washington, D.C. It is 2 miles in length and flows in a southeasterly direction parallel with the Potomac River. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 558.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 6 feet deep, 100 feet wide and 700 feet long at the lower entrance from the Potomac River and a channel 6 feet deep, 80 feet wide and 3,300 feet long at the upper entrance from the Wicomico River. Mean range of tide is 1.9 feet. The cost to the Federal Government for new work for the completed project was $29,947, exclusive of $600 contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. Fully complied with, except that local interests are to furnish releases from damages and spoil disposal areas for future maintenance as required. Total actual costs for all requirements of local cooperation under terms of the project authorization, including required non-Federal contributions, amount to $600. Terminal facilities. There are numerous privately owned wharves and stagings located in St. Catherines Sound and White Neck Creek, a tributary of St. Catherines Sound, of which three are open to the public. There are two marine railways in White Neck Creek. The terminal facilities are considered adequate for present commerce. Operation and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Repair of a damaged bulkhead and completion of the sediment control requirements were completed in connection with maintenance dredging contract which was completed December 4, 1979. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was started in March 1957 and completed in April 1957. 19. ST. JEROMES CREEK, MD. Location. St. Jeromes Creek is a tidal estuary in St. Marys County, Md, 2.5 miles long flowing in a southeasterly direction and entering the western shore of the Chesapeake Bay, 6 miles north of Point Lookout, at the mouth of the Potomac River. The creek is 86 miles northerly of Norfolk, Va. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 557.) Previous project. The original project for improvement was adopted by the River and Harbor Act of March 3, 1881. For further details see Annual Report for 1890, page 114, and Annual Report for 1938, page 432. Existing project. Provides for a channel 100 feet wide and 7 feet deep from Chesapeake Bay to the Vicinity of Airedele, thence 60 feet wide to deep water in the creek, with a turning basin of the same depth 200 feet wide and 300 feet long opposite Airedele. The project is 4,900 feet long. The plane of reference is mean low water. The tidal ranges are: Mean 1.3 feet, and extreme, approximately 7 feet. The cost to the Federal Government for new work, for the completed project was $17,857, exclusive of amounts expended under previous projects. Local cooperation. Fully complied with, except that local interests are to furnish spoil disposal areas for future maintenance as needed. Terminal facilities. There are numerous privately-owned wharves, 2 of which are open to the public. It is considered that the present terminal facilities are adequate for present and prospective commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design in connection with the proposed fiscal year 1982 maintenance dredging was initiated. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was completed in 1939. The total costs for existing project were $128,390, of which $17,857 was for new work and $110,533 was for maintenance. 20. TILGHMAN ISLAND HARBOR, MD. Location. This harbor (also called Dogwood Harbor) is about 60 miles southeast of Baltimore Harbor on eastern side of Tilghman Island, which lies between Chesapeake Bay and Choptank River. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 78). Previous projects. For details see page 278 of Annual Report for 1966. Existing project. Provides for a channel 60 feet wide and 6 feet deep from that depth in Harris Creek to and including an anchorage basin of irregular shape 500 feet long by 200 feet wide, with a 6-foot depth. On October 20, 1980, the Chief of Engineers under authority provided by Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended, authorized construction of a breakwater at the harbor entrance. The estimated first cost of this work is $249,000, of which $245,000 is Federal cost and $4,000 is required local cash contribution. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for work authorized May 13, 1966, except that local interests must furnish all lands, and rights-of-way for future maintenance as needed and maintain a suitable public landing as needed with adequate approaches thereto. For work authorized by the Chief of Engineers October 20, 1980, local interests must: (a) Provide without cost to the United States all necessary lands, easements, and rights-of-way required for construction and subsequent maintenance of the project including suitable spoil disposal areas with necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads, and embankments therefor, or the cost of such retaining works; (b) Hold and save the United States free from damages that may result from construction and maintenance of the project, but not including damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; (c) Accomplish without cost to the United States all alterations and relocations of buildings, transportation facilities, storm drains, utilities, and other structures and improvements made necessary by project construction; (d) Provide and maintain without cost to the United States adequate public terminal and transfer facilities open to all on equal terms; (e) Contribute, in cash, 1.7 percent of the first cost (including contract price, engineering and design, and supervision and administration, excluding the costs of lands, easements, rights-of-way, and relocations) of all items of work to be provided by the Corps of Engineers, the amount presently estimated at $4,000 to be paid in a lump sum prior to start of construction, or in installments, prior to start of pertinent work items, in accordance with work schedules as required by the Chief of Engineers; (f) Establish regulations prohibiting discharge of untreated sewage, garbage, and other pollutants in the waters of the harbor by users thereof, which regulations shall be in accordance with applicable laws or regulations of Federal, State, and local authorities responsible for pollution prevention and control; (g) Comply with applicable provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (P.L. 91-646; 84 Stat. 1894) and implementing regulations; and (h) Comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. 4-8 BALTIMORE, MD. DISTRICT Terminal facilities. Consist of one pier operated by a local seafood packer for transfer of seafood to processing plant. Local interests will construct a public landing and approach road thereto in accordance with terms of local cooperation as part of project development. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Plans and specifications for construction of the breakwater were completed in August 1981. Condition at end of fiscal year. Work authorized May 13, 1966 was started in February and completed March, 1971. Construction of the breakwater authorized October 20, 1980 has .not begun. Total Federal costs for existing project were $535,642, of which $167,336 was for new work and $368,306 for maintenance. 21. TWITCH COVE AND BIG THOROFARE, MD. Location. A tidal waterway about 4 miles long traversing Smith Island, Md., southeasterly from Chesapeake Bay on the west to Tangier Sound on the east. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1224). Existing project. A channel 7 feet deep at mean low water and 60 feet wide from Twitch Cove on Tangier Sound through Big Thorofare, thence through canal at Ewell, Md., thence through Levering Creek and Big Thorofare to vicinity of Swan Point, thence of same depth and 100 feet wide through offshore bar to deep water in Chesapeake Bay, with twin stone jetties at entrance, north jetty is about 2,080 feet long, and south jetty about 1,800 feet long; and anchorage basin 7 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and 700 feet long connecting with west side of existing project channel at Ewell; extension of existing project channel in Levering Creek, 6 feet deep, 60 feet wide, and 1,000 feet long; and a channel 4 feet deep and 25 feet wide around point between Big Thorofare and Tylers River. Mean range of tide is 1.7 feet, and extreme tidal range is 3 feet. Federal cost of new work for completed project was $193,175. Local cooperation. Fully complied with, except that local interests are to furnish spoil disposal areas for future maintenance as needed. Terminal facilities. Numerous privately owned pile-andtimber wharves and bulkheads at Ewell are open to the Public for business transactions with the owners. A county wharf is also at west end of town. Five crab houses are on Levering Creek, and one oyster house on project waterway west of Town of Ewell. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: A condition survey was made of the Twitch Cove and Big Thorofare area at a cost of $30,699. Engineering and design in connection with the proposed fiscal year 1982 maintenance dredging was initiated. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project is complete. Work authorized by 1950 River and Harbor Act was completed in September 1956 and work authorized under prior acts was completed in November 1940. 22. WASHINGTON HARBOR, D.C. Location. Within District of Columbia at junction of Anacostia River with Potomac River which flows southeasterly 108 miles to Chesapeake Bay. It is southerly 202 miles by water from Baltimore, Md., and northerly 195 miles from Norfolk, Va. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 560.) Previous project. For details see page 291 of Annual Report for 1963. Existing projects. A combination and extension of latest projects for Potomac River at Washington, D.C., and Anacostia River, D.C. Project provides for: (a) Virginia Channel, between points 2,000 feet upstream and 3,000 feet downstream of Arlington Memorial Bridge, 24 feet deep and 400 feet wide, with width increased as necessary to afford a lowwater cross section area of 25,000 square feet; (b) Washington Channel, from Haines Point to head of Washington Channel, 24 feet deep and 400 feet wide; (c) Anacostia River from Giesboro Point, to Anacostia Bridge, 24 feet deep and 400 feet wide, with turning basin 800 feet wide and about 2,400 feet long of same depth opposite Naval Weapons Plant; (d) Anacostia River from Anacostia Bridge 24 feet deep and 200 feet wide to turning basin 400 feet square of same depth at foot of 15th Street, S.E. Channel lengths including turning basins are: Virginia Channel, 5,000 feet; Washington Channel, 10,000 feet; and Anacostia River, 15,000 feet; and (e) operation and maintenance of inlet gates and lock and outlet gates of Tidal Basin constructed under a previous project to flush Washington Channel. Plane of reference is low-water datum which is 0.35 foot below mean low tide as observed from 1932 to 1942. Tidal ranges are: mean, 2.9 feet; irregular, 4.5 feet; and extreme, 10.7 feet. Federal cost of new work for completed project was $162,006. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. There are four wharves generally of bulkhead type on Virginia Channel that are privately owned and not open to the public except by special arrangement. On Washington Channel there are four piers under jurisdiction of District of Columbia, two of which are open to the public and one open to the public by special arrangement. In Anacostia River there are four privately owned piers and eight governmental piers and slips. None of the piers are open to the public except by special arrangement. Terminal facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of tidal basin gates by hired labor. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was completed in 1938. Total costs for existing project were $2,245,806 of which $162,006 was for new work and $2,083,800 was for maintenance. This excludes $4,000 for emergency dredging under provisions of Section 3, 1945 River and Harbor Act. 23. WICOMICO RIVER, MD. Location. Wicomico River has its source in northern part of Wicomico County, Md., and flows generally southwardly emptying into Monie Bay, a tributary of Tangier Sound on each side of Chesapeake Bay about 85 miles southeast of Baltimore. Webster Cove is site of improved small-boat harbor on southeast bank of Wicomico River about 3 miles above the mouth. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 567 and 1224.) Previous project. For details see page 275 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. Channel 14 feet deep and 150 feet wide from Chesapeake Bay to Salisbury, section included in project is 37 miles long, including about 12 miles from mouth of river to Chesapeake Bay; 14 feet deep in channels and turning basins in north and south prongs with channel widths of 100 feet, and a channel 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide extending from 6-foot 4-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 contour in Wicomico River to and including a basin in Webster Cove of same depth, 100 feet wide and 400 feet long; and extension of basin 200 feet long and 100 feet wide on each side. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean range of tide is about 3 feet and extreme tidal range is 4.4 feet. Cost of new work for completed project was $421,609, exclusive of amounts expended on previous project. Local cooperation. Fully complied with, except that local interests are to furnish spoil disposal areas for future maintenance as needed and hold the United States free from such damages as may occur to public or leased oyster beds. Terminal facilities. Present waterfront at Salisbury consists of pile-and-timber bulkheads with earthfills. Some wharves have warehouses and factories with mechanical freighthandling facilities and rail sidings. All terminals are privately owned. A shipyard, with two marine railways with capacities of 1,200 and 500 tons, respectively, is on right bank of river below prongs. Areas for development of new terminals on north prong are limited. Areas for considerable expansion of terminal facilities are available on main river. There is a pile-and-timber wharf about 4 miles above mouth of river at Mount Vernon. A wharf of similar construction is at White Haven. There is a county wharf at head of basin in Webster Cove, a pile-andtimber pier at oyster house on southwest side of basin, a T-shaped pile-and-timber pier at cafe on southwest side of basin and several small timber piers on walkways that local interests constructed around the basin. Fueling facilities are available at the T-shaped pier. Sufficient areas are available for construction of additional facilities when required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging of the upper river, by contract, began July 13, 1981 and was completed on September 17, 1981. A total of 178,207 cubic yards of material was removed and deposited on an upland disposal area at cost of $785,702. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was completed in 1942 except for enlarging basin in Webster Cove which was completed November 1956. Total costs for existing project were $3,908,406 of which $421,609 (Federal funds) and $14,000 (contributed funds) were for new work, and $3,439,797 (Federal funds) and $33,000 (contributed funds) were for maintenance. 24. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS (See Table 4-C at end of chapter.) 25. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Table 4-D at end of chapter.) 26. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (preauthorization). Fiscal year cost was $16,121 for Smith Island, Md. Beach Erosion Control 27. COLONIAL BEACH, VA. Location. Colonial Beach, Westmoreland County, Va., is located on the right bank of the Potomac River 40 miles upstream from its mouth at Chesapeake Bay and 69 miles downstream from Washington, D.C. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 558). Existing project. On May 29, 1980, the Chief of Engineers under authority provided by Section 103 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended, authorized construction of the following work: Extending and widening the existing Central Beach area downstream from Hawthorne Street southward to provide an additional beach area of about 107,200 square feet, stablizing with vegetation about 200 feet of the bank behind the beachfill and constructing four segments of offshore breakwater with estimated lengths of 200 feet each, to stablize the beachfill area; and extending and widening the existing beach at Castlewood Park to provide an additional beach area of about 59,300 square feet;. constructing three segments of offshore breakwater with estimated lengths of 200 feet each of two of the segments and 300 feet for the third segment; removing debris in the beachfill area; and constructing a 100-foot long terminal groin at the southern end of the Castlewood Park beachfill. The estimated cost of this work is $1,114,000 of which $557,000 is Federal cost and $557,000 is required local cash contribution. Local cooperation. Among other requirements, local interests must provide all lands, easements, and rights-of-way and relocations required for construction including periodic nourishment and provide a cash contribution equal to 50 percent of the final project construction cost (excluding lands and relocations). Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Plans and specifications were completed in July 1981. Condition at end of fiscal year. Plans and specifications are completed. Construction has not yet started. 28. OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 4-E at end of chapter.) Flood Control 29. BLOOMINGTON LAKE, MD. & W. VA. Location. Project is located on the North Branch Potomac River on the state line between Garrett County, Md., and Mineral County, W. Va. The damsite is located approximately 7.9 miles upstream from the confluence with Savage River at Bloomington, Md. It is also about 5 air miles southwest of the tritowns of Luke and Westernport, Md., and Piedmont, W. Va. (See Geological Survey Quadrangle sheets, "Kitzmiller" and "Westernport," Md.) Existing project. Plan of improvement consists of a rolled earth and rock fill dam with an impervious core and an 800-foot long dike on the left bank. Top of dam would be 296 feet above streambed with a total length of 2,130 feet. When filled to spillway crest, reservoir would extend about 6.6 miles 4-10 BALTIMORE, MD. DISTRICT upstream and inundate 965 acres. Flood control storage of 36,200 acre-feet would be provided. Storage available for low flow augmentation for water supply and water quality improvement would be 92,000 acre-feet. Reservoir would control a drainage area of 263 square miles. Recreation facilities will be provided for picnicking, camping and boating. Estimated cost (1981) of new work is $174,300,000 of which $57,868,000 is required non-federal reimbursement. Local cooperation. See page 4-15 of 1977 Annual Report for requirements. A water supply contract between the Federal Government and the Maryland Potomac Water Authority for repayment of initial water supply costs was executed on November 4, 1970. Satisfactory assurances covering repayment of costs allocated to future water supply have been received from the Commonwealth of Virginia, the District of Columbia, the State of Maryland, and the State of West Virginia. Federally approved water quality standards being put into effect by Maryland, Virginia, West Virginia, and the District of Columbia are considered satisfactory assurances of intent to control pollution. Satisfactory assurances have been received from Maryland, West Virginia, and Virginia that they will protect downstream channels from encroachment that would adversely affect operation of the project. The first of 50 annual payments ($465,631) was received from the seven entities that had agreed to purchase initial water supply storage. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Relocation of State Route 46 continued at a cost of $1,758,000 and is 99 percent complete. Construction of the dam embankment and intake structure was begun December 27, 1976 and is physically complete. Costs were $12,876,000. Work on the spillway and dike begun September 1, 1977 was completed. Costs were $650,000. Instrumentation of the dam by hired labor continued at a cost of $134,251. Plans and specifications for public use facilities were completed. The work was advertised in August 1981 and bids were received September 22, 1981. A contract has not yet been awarded. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $104,522 and $971,120, respectively. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. A reconnaissance study for hydropower was completed at a cost of $5,900 that recommended that further study be conducted since the project site shows definite physical hydropower potential. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project began in June 1971. The overall project is 97 percent complete. In July 1981 the project became operational for water supply, flood control, and for water quality control. 30. BULL RUN, PA. Location. In Loyalsock Township which is located on the left or north bank of the West Branch of the Susquehanna River just downstream from Williamsport, Pa. The proposed project would provide protection to Loyalsock Township from the limit of the Williamsport Project at Millers Run aproximately one mile downstream along the West Branch of the Susquehanna River. Existing project. Provides for alteration of 4,100 linear feet of the proposed highway embankment design by providing an impervious core which will serve as a levee to provide protection from flood stages on the West Branch Susquehanna River, tie back levees from the highway embankment to high ground, and a pumping facility at Bull Run to provide protection from backwater from the West Branch and from interior drainage on Bull Run. Estimated Federal cost (1981) for new work is $2,902,000. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies. Local interests must assume responsibility for all costs in excess of the Federal cost limitation of $3,000,000. An agreement for local cooperation complying with Section 221 of the 1970 Flood Control Act was accepted for the Secretary of the Army on September 21, 1977. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: A construction contract was awarded July 11, 1979 by the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation for its highway embankment which includes the impervious core. Construction was completed at a cost of $191,264. A contract was awarded September 26, 1980 for construction of tie back levees and a pump station. Work was advanced to 75 percent complete at a cost of $666,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project began in July 1979. The overall project is 83 percent complete. 31. CUMBERLAND, MD., AND RIDGELEY, W. VA. Location. On North Branch of Potomac River, 21 miles upstream from its junction with South Branch of Potomac River and 197 miles upstream from Washington, D.C. (See Geological Survey Quadrangles, Frostburg and Flintstone, Md., W. Va., and Pa.) Existing project. Channel improvements of North Branch of Potomac River from Western Maryland Railway bridge in South Cumberland upstream to mouth of Wills Creek, with levees and fill along left bank and levees along right bank from downstream corporate limits of Ridgeley, W. Va., to a point about 150 feet above Johnson Street Bridge; channel improvements along Wills Creek from its mouth upstream to a point in the Narrows about 500 feet upstream from highway bridge on U.S. Highway 40; levee and floodwall in West Cumberland, Md., on left bank of North Branch of Potomac River from mouth of Wills Creek upstream to Kelly Boulevard; levee and floodwall in Ridgeley, W. Va., on right bank of North Branch of Potomac River from Carpenter Avenue upstream to Patapsco Street near upstream corporate limits of Ridgeley, W. Va.; interior drainage facilities in Cumberland and West Cumberland, Md., and Ridgeley, W. Va.; removal of Chesapeake and Ohio Canal dam and construction of a new industrial dam on North Branch of Potomac River immediately above mouth of Wills Creek; and alteration and reconstruction of highway and railroad bridges. Federal costs of new work for the completed project was $15,633,970, which includes $49,998 emergency relief funds and is exclusive of $197,513 public works acceleration funds. Estimated cost to local interests is $2,900,000 of which $1,402,001 is contributed funds and $1,497,999 is for lands and damages. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Removal of gravel deposits, grass cutting of areas channelward of levees, and removal of brush and debris from channel were accomplished as required in channel area. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was started in March 1949 and completed in May 1959, except for minor items of land acquisition, which were completed in June 1963. Project was transferred to City of Cumberland, Md., for operation and maintenance May 1959. 4-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 32. FOURMILE RUN, VA. Location. The project is located in the City of Alexandria and in Arlington County, Va., on Fourmile Run immediately above its confluence with the Potomac River at Washington, D.C. (See Geological Survey Quadrangle sheets for Alexandria, Va., Annandale, Va., Falls Church, Va., and Washington West, D.C., Md., and Va.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a floodwall protection system, an improved channel, and replacement of two highway and four railroad bridges. Total estimated cost (1981) of new work is $54,219,000 of which $2,439,000 is non- Federal. Local cooperation. See page 4-17 of the 1977 Annual Report for requirements. Agreements for local cooperation complying with Section 221 of the 1970 Flood Control Act and Subsection 84 (b) of the 1974 Water Resources Development Act were accepted for the Secretary of the Army on April 23, 1974. Agreements for local cooperation concerning recreation cost sharing were accepted for the Secretary of the Army on May 30, 1974. An interjurisdictional agreement among Alexandria, and Falls Church and Arlington and Fairfax Counties was executed in March 1977 for implementing a watershed control program. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Construction of the remaining channels which began July 20, 1978 was completed. Costs were $462,403. Plans and specifications for channel redredging were completed. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $78,551 and $52,662 respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was initiated in June 1974. The overall project is 97 percent complete. Work remaining is dredging to remove silting of the channel in the area of the completed downstream portion of the project. 33. LACKAWANNA RIVER BASIN, PA. Flood Control Act of 1962 authorized construction of Aylesworth Creek Lake, Fall Brook Lake, and local protection works on Lackawanna River at Scranton, Pa., substantially as recommended by Chief of Engineers (S. Doc. 141, 87th Cong., 2d sess.). The Basin includes an area of 346 square miles in northeastern Pennsylvania. (See Tables 4-F and 4-G at end of chapter.) (See Geological Survey maps: "Avoca," "Carbondale," "Clifford," and "Scranton," Pa.) 33A. AYLESWORTH CREEK LAKE, PA. Location. Project is located in Lackawanna County on Aylesworth Creek about one mile above its confluence with the Lackawanna River, near the community of East Jermyn, Pa. Existing project. Provides for an earthfill dam with a maximum height of 90 feet above streambed and a top length of 1,200 feet. The spillway located adjacent to the left abutment is an open cut channel 80 feet wide with a concrete sill. The outlet works consist of a 3-foot diameter uncontrolled conduit. Project will control a drainage area of 6.2 square miles and provide flood control storage of 1,700 acre-feet equivalent to 5.1 inches of runoff from the drainage areas. The lake will extend about 4,600 feet and inundate 87 acres when filled to spillway crest. Recreation facilities constructed by local interest include a bathing beach, bathhouse, and picnic area. Federal cost of new work was $2,268,200 of which $2,153,559 was for construction and $114,641 for lands and damages. In addition $52,200 Federal and $52,200 non-Federal funds were expended for construction of bathhouse facilities under recreation facilities for completed projects program. Local cooperation. None required. The Aylesworth Creek Reservoir Park Authority, representing the Boroughs of Archbald and Jermyn, operate and maintain limited day use facilities including a small beach. In September 1978 a cost sharing agreement for construction of bathhouse facilities was signed. The cost for the facilities which were completed in July 1979 was $104,400, of which $52,200 was Federal and $52,200 was non-Federal. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. Resurfacing of the primary access road and parking area, by contract began in September 1980 and was completed in October 1980 at a cost of $65,870. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project began in November 1967 and was completed in October 1970. 34. RAYSTOWN LAKE RAYSTOWN BRANCH, JUNIATA RIVER, PA. Location. Damsite is on Raystown Branch, about 5.5 miles upstream from its confluence with Juniata River. Project is about 10 miles south of Huntingdon, Pa. (See Geological Survey Quadrangle sheets, Huntingdon, Mt. Union, Broad Top and Everett, Pa.) Existing project. The rock and earthfill dam rises 225 feet above streambed with a gated concrete spillway and auxiliary spillway in the right abutment. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 762,000 acre-feet, of which 248,000 acre-feet are for flood control, 476,000 acre-feet for recreation and water quality control, and the balance for sediment reserve. At full flood control pool elevation, reservoir would inundate 10,800 acres and extend 34 miles upstream. Recreation facilities are provided for boating, fishing, camping, swimming, hunting, and picnicking. Federal cost for new work was $77,408,700 of which $46,120,931 was for construction and $31,287,769 was for lands and damages including relocations. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance of the project continued. A contract for preparation of plans and specifications for visitor center began in February 1979 and was completed in December 1980 at a cost of $47,282. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project began in November 1968. The dam and appurtenances were operationally complete November 1, 1973. The overall project was completed in December 1978 except for minor completion items. 35. SOUTHERN NEW YORK FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Authorized plan provides for construction of reservoirs and related flood control works for protection of towns in New York and Pennsylvania. The improvements are located in the upper watershed of Susquehanna River to and including Chemung River. Individual units which constitute approved plan of improvements are listed in Table 4-H at end of chapter. (Also see Table 4-I at end of chapter.) 4-12 BALTIMORE, MD. DISTRICT 35A. ADDISON, N.Y. Location. At confluence of Tuscarora Creek and Canisteo River in the City of Addison, N.Y. (See Geological Survey map for Addison, N.Y.) Existing project. Provides for construction of about 3,100 feet of earth levee and 700 feet of concrete floodwall on right bank of Canisteo River, extending from high ground on Steuben Street near Baltimore & Ohio Railroad to mouth of Tuscarora Creek; removal of existing dam, mill, and raceway from channel; construction of about 2,200 feet of earth levee on left bank of Tuscarora Creek, extending from Tuscarora Street to Canisteo River; construction of 4,600 feet of earth levee on right bank of Tuscarora Creek, extending from high ground at southwest edge of village to high ground at southeast edge of village; and appurtenant drainage structures. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was completed in 1947. 35B. ALMOND LAKE, N.Y. Location: Dam is located two miles upstream from Hornell, N.Y., on Canacadea Creek, a tributary of the Canisteo River. (See Geological Survey map for Hornell, N.Y.) Existing project. The dam is an earthfill structure, 1,260 feet long rising 90 feet above the streambed, with a concrete spillway and a gated outlet conduit in the left abutment. The outlet works consist of three 5-foot by 10-foot service gates and three emergency gates of the same size. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 14,640 acre-feet at spillway crest. The project controls a draining area of 56 square miles, 36 percent of the watershed of the Canisteo River upstream from Hornell, N.Y. Recreation facilities include a boat-launching ramp and dock, bathing beach, picnic area, and tent and trailer camping area. Local cooperation. None required. Local interests have developed recreational facilities at the lake in conjunction with the Federal Government. These facilities are operated and maintained by the Steuben County Board of Supervisors. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of project continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. The dam was operationally complete in fiscal year 1949 and physically complete in fiscal year 1956. Recreational facilities, including a seasonal recreation pool of 124 acres and boating, picknicking and sanitary facilities, were completed in fiscal year 1966. 35C. ARKPORT DAM, N.Y. Location. Dam is located five miles upstream from Hornell, N.Y., on the Canisteo River, a tributary of the Chemung River which flows into the Susquehanna River. (See Geological Survey map for Arkport, N.Y.) Existing project. The dam is an earthfill structure, 1,200 feet long, exclusive of spillway, rises 113 feet above streambed, with a concrete spillway and an ungated outlet in the right abutment. The outlet structure consists of an 8-foot diameter reinforced concrete lined conduit, 660 feet long. A cast iron nozzle is placed in the lower end of the conduit, reducing the outlet size to 4 feet 4 inches. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 7,950 acre-feet at spillway crest. The project controls a drainage area of 31 square miles, 20 percent of the watershed of the Canisteo River upstream from Hornell. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. The dam was operationally complete in fiscal year 1940 and physically complete in fiscal year 1953. 35D. AVOCA, N.Y. Location. On the Cohocton River of Village of Avoca, N.Y., about 30 miles upstream from confluence of Cohocton and Chemung Rivers. (See Geological Survey map for Avoca, N.Y.) Existing project. Provides for improvement and realinement of about 8,300 feet of Cohocton River channel, extending from above Erie Railroad to below junction of Main Street and U.S. Highway 15; construction of about 8,500 feet of earth levee on left bank of Cohocton River, extending from high ground above Alexander Avenue to about 1,300 feet below junction of Main Street and U.S. Highway 15; and 4,500 feet of earth levee on right bank of Salmon Creek, extending from high ground above Alexander Avenue to Erie Railroad; a new highway bridge for U.S. Highway 15 over Cohocton River, raising of Erie Railroad bridge 4 feet; and appurtenant drainage structures. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was completed in 1939. 35E. BINGHAMTON, N.Y. Location. At the confluence of the Chenango and Susquehanna Rivers in the City of Binghamton, N.Y. (See Geological Survey map for Binghamton, N.Y.) Existing project. Provides for construction of earth levees, concrete floodwalls, and appurtenant drainage structures, consisting of about 850 feet of channel excavation and about 1,375 feet of earth levee along Phelps Creek, Town of Port Dickinson; new concrete wall on right bank of Chenango River, extending downstream from high ground near city limits to existing floodwall below DeForest Street, a distance of about 520 feet; about 150 feet of concrete wall just below Cutler Dam; about 180 feet of concrete wall at pumphouse near McDonald Avenue; raising existing earth levees on right bank of Chenango River, extending from Cutler Dam downstream for about 1,220 feet; about 2,915 feet of earth levee on left bank of Chenango River north of city limits in Village of Port Dickinson, extending from Church Street to high ground just north of city line; about 3,900 feet of earth levee on left bank of Chenango River, extending from DeForest Street to Cutler Dam; new concrete floodwalls and riverbank revetment for about 5,570 feet extending on left bank of Chenango River from Cutler Dam to junction with Susquehanna River; about 540 feet of new concrete floodwall and raising about 1,085 feet of concrete floodwall on right bank of Susquehanna River, extending from Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad downstream to Tompkins Street Bridge; about 1,940 feet of earth levee; about 1,940 feet of concrete floodwall and capping about 125 feet of concrete floodwall, on right bank of Susquehanna River from Stuyvesent Street to 4-13 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 mouth of Chenango River; about 8,380 feet of earth levee, about 2,180 feet of new concrete floodwall and raising about 125 feet of existing floodwall on left bank of Susquehanna River extending from Pierce Creek to high ground at State Highway 17; a debris dam and flume between Corbett and Hotchkiss Streets and a concrete pressure conduit, 1,060 feet long to carry flow of Park Creek from Vestal Avenue to Susquehanna River; about 665 feet of levee extending from Erie Railroad to high ground along right bank of Chamberlain Creek near the mouth; closure structures at Erie Railroad and at Court Street; a weir, a drop structure, and about 1,800 feet of earth levee, about 2,235 feet of channel excavation, about 645 feet of channel paving and raising, about 470 feet of existing concrete floodwall, and about 200 feet of new concrete floodwall for improvement of Pierce Creek from its mouth to about 1,000 feet above Conklin Avenue; and appurtenant drainage structures. Improvement, supplemented by authorized flood control dams above the area, will provide protection for City of Binghamton against a flood discharge about 20 percent greater than maximum flood of record, which occurred in July 1935 on Chenango River and in March 1936 on Susquehanna River. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the'project continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was completed in 1943. 35F. CANISTEO, N.Y. Location. On Purdy and Bennetts Creeks in Town of Canisteo, N.Y., situated along the south side of Canisteo River, at the confluence of Bennetts Creek and Canisteo River. (See Geological Survey map for Canisteo, N.Y.) Existing project. Provides for construction of about 8,000 feet of earth levees on right bank of Canisteo River, extending from high ground 1,570 feet west of State Highway Route 21 above Town to a point at intersection of Ordway Lane and East Main Street; about 7,400 feet of earth levee on left bank of Purdy and Bennetts Creeks, extending from Main Street Bridge to high ground above Greenwood Street; 1,000 feet of earth levee on right bank of Bennetts Creek extending upstream from Main Street Bridge; a concrete check dam with wing levees from Greenwood Street; a new highway bridge at Greenwood Street; alterations to existing timber check dams in Bennetts Creek; channel excavation in Bennetts and Purdy Creeks; and appurtenant drainage structures. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was completed in 1948. 35G. CORNING, N.Y. Location. On Chemung River in City of Corning, N.Y., about 44 miles upstream from confluence of Chemung River and North Branch of Susquehanna River. (See Geological Survey map for Corning, N.Y.) Existing project. Flood protection for this community was originally authorized by Flood Control Act of 1936. Plan of improvement provides for construction of a pumping station, earth levees, and concrete floodwalls, consisting of: about 4,300 feet of earth levee, enlargement of about 8,610 feet of existing earth levee and about 3,100 feet of concrete floodwall on right bank of Chemung River, extending from Erie Railroad Bridge to high ground at Park Avenue below city; about 200 feet of concrete floodwalls; about 2,500 feet of earth levees and enlargement of about 11,500 feet of existing earth levee on left bank of Chemung and Cohocton Rivers, extending from Erie Railroad Bridge over Cohocton River mouth of Post Creek; about 2,500 feet of earth levee and enlargement of about 4,700 feet of existing earth levee on right bank of Post Creek from its mouth to Watkins Street; realinement of about 3,000 feet of channel, about 8,800 feet of earth levee, about 3,000 feet of channel excavation, a pressure conduit about 400 feet long, a drop structure and a weir for improvement of Cutler Creek, extending from its mouth to high ground at Deckertown Road and Hornby Road; and appurtenant drainage structures. Flood protection on Monkey Run was authorized by Flood Control Act of 1950. Plan of improvement provides for construction of 2,010 feet of open flume, 2,320 feet of pressure conduit storm sewers, and appurtenant facilities between existing improved channel above Sixth Street and Chemung River at a point immediately east of Pine Street East. Modified improvement will provide protection for City of Corning against a flood discharge in Chemung River approximately equal to maximum flood of record, which occurred in May 1945, and on tributary streams against floods of greater magnitude than known to date. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was completed in 1942 except for work on Monkey Run, which was completed in 1955. 35H. EAST SIDNEY LAKE, N.Y. Location. Dam is located near East Sidney, N.Y., on Ouleout Creek, about five miles above confluence of the creek with Susquehanna River. (See Geological Survey map for Franklin, N.Y.) Existing project. The dam is an earthfill and concrete structure, 2,010 feet long, including spillway, rises 130 feet above streambed and consists of a concrete gravity-type section with a compacted earth-dike section at the right abutment. The outlet works consist of five rectangular conduits each 3.5 feet by 5.85 feet and 105 feet long. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 33,500 acre-feet at spillway crest. The project controls a drainage area of 102 square miles which is 93 percent of the Ouleout Creek drainage area, and 5 percent of the watershed of the Susquehanna River upstream from Binghamton, N.Y., exclusive of the separately controlled Chenango River. Recreation facilities include a bathing beach, picnic and camping areas, and boat-launching and docking facilities. Local cooperation. None required. The Town of Sidney, N.Y., cooperated in the development of recreation facilities and operates and maintains all the facilities with the exception of the recreational pool, which is the responsibility of the Federal Government. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. The dam was operationally complete in fiscal year 1949 and physically complete in fiscal year 1956. 4-14 BALTIMORE, MD. DISTRICT 351. ELMIRA, N.Y. Location. On Chemung River in City of Elmira, N.Y., about 27 miles upstream from confluence of Chemung River and North Branch of Susquehanna River. (See Geological Survey map for Elmira, N.Y.) Existing project. Provides for construction of about 17,700 feet of earth levees, and about 4,100 feet of concrete floodwall on right bank of Chemung River, extending from South Hoffman Street to a point below city near upper end of Big Island; about 12,100 feet of earth levee and about 6,300 feet of concrete wall on left bank of Chemung River extending from Durland Avenue to Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad at mouth of Newton Creek; about 10,000 feet of earth levee on right bank of Newton Creek, extending from about intersection of Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad and east Church Street to high ground near intersection of Sullivan and Warren Streets; about 4,300 feet of earth levee on right bank of Divan Creek; about 2,000 feet of concrete conduit inclosing Hoffman Brook from West Second Street to Chemung River; clearing islands and riverbanks of trees and brush for about 3.5 miles in Chemung River; about 14,300 feet of earth levee on left bank of Seely Creek, extending from Erie Railroad to high ground approximately 1,000 feet northwest of intersection of South Broadway and Pennsylvania Avenue; a pumping plant for disposal of interior drainage; an interceptor sewer about 6,000 feet long varying in size from 48 to 96 inches in diameter; and appurtenant structures. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was completed in 1950. 35J. HORNELL, N.Y. Location. On Canisteo River in City of Hornell, N.Y., about 42 miles upstream from confluence of Canisteo and Tioga Rivers. (See Geological Survey map for Canisteo, N.Y.) Existing project. Provides for channel realinement and construction of earth levees, concrete floodwalls, and check dams consisting of: realinement of about 4,600 feet of Canisteo River channel, and about 5,800 feet of earth levee on its right bank, extending from Seneca Street upstream to junction of Pittsburgh, Shawmut & Northern Railroad and Erie Railroad; construction of about 4,500 feet of earth levee, extending on both sides of Seneca Street from Canisteo River to Wrightman Avenue and junction of Cleveland Avenue and Bethesda Drive; construction of about 7,200 feet of earth levee, about 2,500 feet of concrete floodwall, and raising about 1,500 feet of existing concrete floodwall, on right bank of Canisteo River, and about 12,000 feet of channel improvement, extending from Seneca Street to Erie Railroad; construction of about 2,500 feet of earth levee, about 2,100 feet of concrete floodwall on left bank of Canisteo River extending from a point opposite Walnut Street to Erie Railroad; a ring-earth levee about 2,800 feet long around sewage-disposal plant on left bank of Canisteo River; about 4,500 feet of realinement and improvement of Canisteo River Channel with about 4,500 feet of earth levee on its right bank extending from Cedar Street downstream to about 1,400 feet above East Avenue; about 2,400 feet of channel paving, 1,400 feet of earth levee, raising about 1,900 feet of concrete floodwall, and construction of one check dam on Canacadea Creek; about 1,600 feet of channel paving and construction of three check dams on Chauncey Run with about 300 feet of new wall and about 300 feet of capping; a weir, a check dam, 3,030 feet of channel paving, 4,800 feet of floodwalls and levees, and related work on existing walls, on Crosby Creek; removal of 6 bridges, erection of 4 bridges, miscellaneous bridge structures, and 3 drop structures; and appurtenant drainage structures and small stream control works. Improvement, supplemented by Arkport and Almond Reservoirs above the area, provides protection for City of Hornell against a flood discharge approximately double maximum flood of record, which occurred in July 1935. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. Rehabilitation of a portion of the Canacadea Creek floodwall, by contract, began in September 1980 and was completed in September 1981 at a cost of $365,321. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was completed in 1941. Rehabilitation of check dam on Canacadea Creek, by contract, began May 18, 1966 and was completed January 12, 1967. Rehabilitation of deteriorated floodwalls along Canacadea and Crosby Creeks, by contract, began June 19, 1962 and was completed May 21, 1963. 35K. LISLE, N.Y. Location. On Tioughnioga River in Village of Lisle, N.Y., about 12 miles upstream from confluence of Tioughnioga and Chenango Rivers. (See Geological Survey map for Lisle, N.Y.) Existing project. Provides for channel realinement and construction of earth levees and concrete floodwalls, consisting of: relocation of about 3,000 feet of Dudley Creek Channel, extending from 1,200 feet west of intersection of Cortland and Main Streets to confluence with Tioughnioga River, realinement of some 5,700 feet of Tioughnioga River Channel east of Village; about 4,150 feet of earth levee and 970 feet of concrete wall on right bank of Dudley Creek and Tioughnioga River; realinement of some 5,700 feet of Tioughnioga Street to railroad crossing on River Street; raising about 1,860 feet of Delaware, Lackawanna & Western single track railroad over the levee; relocation of about 1,600 feet of Cortland Street; a new bridge over relocated Dudley Creek; and appurtenant drainage structures. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was completed in 1948. 35L. OXFORD, N.Y. Location. On Chenango River in the Village of Oxford, N.Y., about 40 miles upstream from confluence of Chenango and Susquehanna Rivers. (See Geological Survey map for Oxford, N.Y.) Existing project. Provides for construction of earth levees and clearing of Chenango River channel, consisting of about 2,100 feet of earth levees on left bank of Chenango River, extending from high ground near Cemetery Drive and running mostly along railroad to high ground near Main Street; removal of dam and island below Main Street; raising Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad over levee; and appurtenant closure and drainage structures. Improvement provides protection for Village of Oxford on left bank against a flood discharge substantially larger than maximum flood of record, which occurred in July 1935. 4-15 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was completed in 1938. 35M. WHITNEY POINT LAKE, N.Y. Location. Dam is located near Whitney Point, N.Y., on the Otselic River about 0.7 of a mile upstream from its confluence with Tioughnioga River. (See Geological Survey map for Whitney Point and Willet, N.Y.) Existing project. The dam is an earthfill structure, 4,900 feet long, exclusive of a spillway, rises 95 feet above the streambed, with a concrete spillway and gated outlet in the left abutment. The outlet works consist of three 5-foot by 10-foot gates and one emergency gate of the same size. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 86,440 acre-feet at spillway crest. The project controls a drainage area of 255 square miles, the entire watershed of Otselic River, or 16 percent of the Chenango River watershed upstream from Binghamton, N.Y. Recreation facilities, constructed in cooperation with local interests, provide for swimming, picnicking, camping, boating, fishing, and hunting. Local cooperation. None required. Local interests operate and maintain all of the recreation facilities. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. The dam was operationally complete in fiscal year 1942 and physically complete in fiscal year 1953. Recreational facilities were completed in fiscal year 1971. 35N. WHITNEY POINT VILLAGE, N.Y. Location. On Tioughnioga River at the confluence of Tioughnioga and Otselic Rivers, tributaries of Susquehanna River. (See Geological Survey map for Whitney Point, N.Y.) Existing project. Provides for channel realinement and construction of earth levees, consisting of realinement of about 1,800 feet of Tioughnioga River channel, above confluence with Otselic River; about 7,100 feet of earth levee along right bank of Tioughnioga River, extending from high ground on Main Street above village to Collins Street just below village; and appurtenant drainage structures. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was completed in 1948. 36. STILLWATER LAKE LACKAWANNA RIVER, PA. Location. Dam is on Lackawanna River, 39 miles from mouth of stream and about 4 miles upstream from Forest City, Susquehanna County, Pa. (See Geological Survey Quadrangle sheet, "Honesdale, Pa.") Existing project. Dam is earthfill type, rising 77 feet above streambed, with a controlled outlet conduit and side channel spillway in left abutment. Reservoir capacity is 12,000 acrefeet, of which 11,600 acre-feet is flood control storage and remainder utilized to maintain existing water supply reservoir for Forest City, Pa., at this site. Reservoir area of 422 acres, and pool extends about 2.1 miles upstream. Reservoir controls 52 percent of watershed above Carbondale, 26 percent above Olyphant, and 17 percent above Scranton. Federal cost of new work, completed in 1965, was $5,725,700 of which $4,500,500 was for construction and $1,225,200 was for lands and damages. Local cooperation. None required. Section 2, Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938, applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of project continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of project was completed in 1964. 37. SUSQUEHANNA RIVER FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS, N.Y. AND PA. Plan of improvement authorized by 1958 Flood Control Act provides for construction of Cowanesque Lake, Pa., Tioga- Hammond Lakes, Pa., local protection works at Elkland, Pa., and Nichols, N.Y., and channel improvements at Cortland, N.Y. This project plan supplemented the comprehensive flood control program for Southern New York and Northern Pennsylvania which included Southern New York flood control project and Stillwater, Genegantslet, and South Plymouth Reservoirs. (See Tables 4-J and 4-K at end of chapter.) 37A. COWANESQUE LAKE, PA. Location. Dam is on Cowanesque River about 2.2 miles above its confluence with Tioga River at Lawrenceville, Pa. (See Geological Survey map for Tioga, Pa.) Existing project. Provides for construction of an earthfill dam, 3,100 feet long and rising 151 feet above streambed, with an uncontrolled spillway in right abutment and a gated conduit in valley floor. Flood control storage is 82,000 acre-feet, equivalent to 5.6 inches of runoff from drainage area. Relocation of the Town of Nelson to a new townsite was authorized by Section 121 of the 1976 Water Resources Development Act. Estimated Federal cost (1981) of new work is $106,000,000 of which $60,820,000 is for construction and $45,180,000 is for lands and damages and relocations (which includes $5,755,000 for the relocation of the Town of Nelson). Local cooperation. The Water Resources Development Act of 1976, which authorized relocation of the Town of Nelson, provides that before the Secretary of the Army acquires any real estate property for the new townsite appropriate non-Federal interests shall furnish binding contractual commitments that all lots in the new townsite will be either occupied when available, will be replacements for open space and vacant lots in the existing town, or will be purchased by non-Federal interests at the fair market value. The required contractual agreement for local cooperation was executed with Nelson Township on August 25, 1977. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Construction under the highway relocation Unit III contract was completed. Fiscal year cost was $266,507. Construction of the phosphorus removal system for the Nelson Treatment plant was completed at a cost of $185,310. Repair of the spillway approach channel was completed under a contract awarded 4-16 BALTIMORE, MD. DISTRICT April 6, 1981. Fiscal year cost was $110,000. A contract for construction of the Tompkins boat launch was awarded August 7, 1981. A reformulation study addressing the feasibility of adding water supply to the project was initiated in June 1979 and is 91 percent complete. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $350,269 and $275,212, respectively. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project began July 24, 1973. The overall project is 99 percent complete. 37B. TIOGA-HAMMOND LAKES, PA. Location. The dams are located in Tioga County, Pa., upstream from the confluence of the Tioga River and Crooked Creek. Tioga Dam is located on the Tioga River and Hammond Dam on Crooked Creek, approximately opposite the Tioga damsite, about 3.3 miles above its mouth and less than one mile from the Village of Brooklyn. (See Geological Survey map for Tioga, Pa.) Existing project. Tioga Dam is 2,600 feet long, rising 140 feet above streambed, with a controlled outlet conduit. Hammond Dam is 5,900 feet long, a maximum height of 121.5 feet above streambed, with a concrete spillway. Both dams will be of earth and rockfill construction. The Tioga-Hammond Lakes project controls total drainage area of 402 square miles, with Tioga Dam controlling 280 square miles of the Tioga River Basin and Hammond Dam controlling 122 square miles of the Crooked Creek Basin. Recreation facilities are provided for swimming, camping, picnicking, boating, and fishing. Estimated Federal cost (1981) of new works is $192,700,000 of which $134,300,000 is for construction and $58,400,000 is for lands and damages and relocations. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Final payment for the dam and appurtenances contract resulted in a credit of $711,014. Investigation of seepage at the toe of Hammond dam resulted in construction of additional drainage features. Work was accomplished during the period January to March 1981 at a cost of $428,496. A contract for modification to the Mansfield sewage line was awarded August 28, 1981. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $104,261 and $165,587, respectively. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project began October 5, 1971. The overall project is 97 percent complete. 38. WEST BRANCH OF SUSQUEHANNA RIVER, PA. A system of three flood control reservoirs in headwaters of West Branch Susquehanna River, Pa. The reservoirs, to be known as Curwensville, Alvin R. Bush, formerly known as Kettle Creek, and Foster Joseph Sayers formerly known as Blanchard, are on West Branch about 2.5 miles upstream from Curwensville, Pa.; on Kettle Creek 8.4 miles above the mouth and 17 miles upstream from Renovo, Pa.; and on Bald Eagle Creek about 1 mile upstream from Blanchard, Pa., respectively. (See Table 4-L at end of chapter.) In accordance with the terms of local cooperation{ the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania furnished assurances that it will coordinate operation of George B. Stevenson Reservoir, formerly known as First Fork Reservoir, with operation of Curwensville, Alvin R. Bush, and Foster Joseph Sayers Reservoirs to secure optimum flood control benefits from system operation. George B. Stevenson Reservoir on First Fork Sinnemahoning Creek in Cameron and Potter Counties, Pa., was constructed by Commonwealth of Pennsylvania at a first cost of $12,240,000 and an estimated $30,000 annually for operation and maintenance. 38A. ALVIN R. BUSH DAM, PA. Location. Alvin R. Bush Dam (formerly Kettle Creek Dam) is located on Kettle Creek about 8.4 miles above the mouth and 15 miles upstream from Renovo, Pa. (See Geological Survey map for Keating, Pa.) Existing project. Dam is an earthfill structure, about 1,350 feet long, rises 165 feet above the streambed, with an uncontrolled spillway located in rock adjacent to the right abutment, and a horseshoe-shaped outlet tunnel with 3 service gates. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 75,000 acre-feet at spillway crest. The project controls a drainage area of 226 square miles or about 92 percent of the Kettle Creek watershed recreation facilities. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of project began in May 1959 and was completed in February 1962. 38B. CURWENSVILLE LAKE, PA. Location. Dam is on West Branch of the Susquehanna River approximately 2.5 miles upstream from Curwensville, Clearfield County, Pa. (See Geological Survey map for Curwensville, Pa.) Existing project. Dam is an earthfill structure, about 1,850 feet long, rises 131 feet above the streambed, with an open-cut concrete sill 1,750 feet from the left abutment. The outlet works located in the left abutment consist of a 15-foot diameter circular outlet conduit with 3 s'ide control gates 5.5 feet wide and 12 feet high. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 124,200 acre-feet at spillway crest. The project controls a drainage area of 365 square miles, or about 98 percent of the West Branch Susquehanna River at Curwensville and about 75 percent at Clearfield. Recreation facilties include a seasonal recreational pool of 790 acres, access roads, parking areas, beach area, boat dock and launching ramp. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of project continued. Boundary survey and monumentation, by contract, began in August 1979 and was completed in January 1981 at a cost of $208,720. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of project began May 1962 and was completed November 1966. 4-17 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 38C. FOSTER JOSEPH SAYERS DAM, PA. 40. YORK, CODORUS CREEK, PA. Location. Dam is located on Bald Eagle Creek in Centre County, Pa., about one mile upstream from Blanchard and about 14 miles above the confluence of Bald Eagle Creek with the West Branch Susquehanna River at Lock Haven, Pa. (See Geological Survey map for Howard, Pa.) Existing project. Dam is an earthfill structure, about 6,835 feet long, rises 100 feet above the streambed, with an open-cut concrete chute and uncontrolled concrete weir 600 feet wide located in rock in a saddle adjacent to the left abutment. The outlet works, located in the left abutment, consist of a 15-foot diameter circular outlet conduit with two hydraulicallyoperated wheel gates 7 feet wide and 15 feet high. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 99,000 acre-feet at spillway crest. The project controls a drainage area of 339 square miles or 88 percent of the drainage area above Beech Creek and 43 percent of the Bald Eagle Creek drainage area. Recreation facilities will include a summer recreation pool of 1,730 acres, a conservation pool of 630 acres for the preservation of fish life, access roads, parking areas, boat docks and launching ramps, and camping areas. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. Paving of access roads, by contract, began in September 1980 and was completed in November 1980 at a cost of $56,763. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is complete and has been operational since August 1969. Construction of the project began in March 1965 and was completed in September 1972. 39. WYOMING VALLEY, PENNSYLVANIA Location. The project is located in Luzerne County, Pennsylvania, on the Susquehanna River. The project area is limited to the four existing Federal flood control projects. These levee improvements are in Plymouth, Kingston-Edwardsville, Swoyersville-Forty Fort, and Wilkes-Barre and Hanover Township. Existing project. For descriptions of the four existing projects see TABLE4-M. The plan of improvement recommended in the Phase I General Design Memorandum provides for raising the existing levees and floodwalls from five to seven feet, modifying closure structures, and providing some relocations, new levees and floodwalls and recreation facilities. The plan also provides for raising five other local flood protection projects, removing an abandoned railroad bridge and providing nonstructural flood control measures. Local cooperation. Among other items local interests will be required to contribute an estimated $50,400,000 prior to project construction in accordance with the President's 1978 proposed cost sharing policy. By letter dated August 28, 1981 the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and Luzerne County jointly indicated their willingness to fulfill the required items of local cooperation in accordance with existing cost sharing policy. Operations and results during fiscal year. The Phase I General Design Memorandum was submitted to the Division Engineer for issuance of his notice of study completion. Condition at end of fiscal year. Phase I planning was essentially completed. Location. On Codorus Creek 10 miles above its confluence with main Susquehanna River. Codorus Creek with its tributary branches in York County in south and central parts of Pennsylvania (See Geological Survey Quadrangle sheets, "Pennsylvania- York and Hanover.") Existing project. Construction of Indian Rock Dam, an earth and rockfill dam about 1,000 feet long at top, rising 83 feet above the streambed, with a reservoir providing for controlled storage of 28,000 acre-feet at elevation of spillway crest. Dam is on main branch of Codorus Creek about 3 miles above York. Outlet works are in right abutment and uncontrolled spillway is on right bank, discharging upstream from tunnel outlet. Reservoir will control entire drainage area of main branch of Codorus Creek and 41 percent of drainage area above York. Plan also provides for improvements in Codorus Creek Channel in vicinity of and through City of York for about 22,969 feet extending from 300 feet above Richland Avenue to a point downstream from Pennsylvania Railroad crossing known as Black Bridge. Improvements, which will increase channel capacity to 24,000 cubic feet per second, include widening and deepening channel, constructing bank protection, removing York Roller Mill Dam, and construction of a low water channel about 3,900 feet long in vicinity of York Roller Mill Dam. Cost of new work for completed project was $5,061,167, of which $4,566,446 (regular funds) and $11,588 (emergency relief funds) were for construction and $483,133 (regular funds) was for lands and damages. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938, applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was operationally complete in November 1947 and remaining construction features were completed in September 1952 and November 1955. 41. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Projects in New York, Pennsylvania, Maryland, District of Columbia, and Virginia were inspected during the period by hired labor. 42. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS Operations and results during fiscal year. The operation of George B. Stevenson Dam, Pa., was coordinated with the operation of Alvin R. Bush, Curwensville, and Foster Joseph Sayers Dams in the West Branch Susquehanna River Basin in order to secure optimum flood control benefits from the system operation. Costs during the period were $9,816. Supplemental instructions for the operation of Savage River Dam, Md., were provided, during periods of high water, to insure maximum protection for downstream localities. Costs during the period were $32,653. An embankment stability analysis was completed at a cost of $85,482 which concluded that Savage River Dam is considered structurally safe for all operating conditions. 4-18 BALTIMORE, MD. DISTRICT 43. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 4-M at end of chapter.) 44. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency flood control activities--repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation). (See Table 4-N at end of chapter.) Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization). Fiscal year costs were $106,954 for Conklin-Kirkwood, NY, Nonstructural study and $24,632 for Swatara Creek, Pine Grove, Pa. Water Supply 45. POTOMAC ESTUARY PILOT WATER TREATMENT PLANT, D.C. Location. The project is located in Washington, D.C., on the north side of the District of Columbia's Water Pollution Control Plant (Blue Plains), about 600 feet east of the Potomac River shoreline. Existing project. The project consists of a water treatment plant with a maximum capacity of one million gallons per day that includes advanced treatment processes and an evaluation laboratory. Local cooperation. On June 28, 1977 the Government of the District of Columbia issued a real estate permit for the construction of the pilot plant on 1.5 acres of land available at the Blue Plains wastewater treatment facility in Washington, D.C. A review during preconstruction planning determined that cost sharing for the pilot plant by local governmental entities is not required. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Calibration of plant equipment and system was performed over the period August 18, 1980 to March 15, 1981. The two year operation and evaluation program was initiated on March 16, 1981 and is proceeding as scheduled. Condition at end of fiscal year. The plant is fully operational and data from six months of operation has been collected and analyzed. Work remaining includes eighteen months of testing and evaluation at the plant; preparation of a final report on the feasibility of using the Potomac Estuary as a source of potable water supply; and plant deactivation. 46. WASHINGTON AQUEDUCT Location. The diversion dam and raw water supply intakes at Great Falls, the two collecting conduits, part of Dalecarlia receiving reservoir, the booster pumping station, and the Little Falls raw water pumping station are located in Maryland. All other structures of the water supply system including parts of the raw water collecting system, two purification plants, pumping stations, storage reservoirs, and transmission mains are in the District of Columbia. Federal owned water mains are maintained in Virginia and Maryland. Existing project. Control of the water supply system is vested in Chief of Engineers (See Acts of March 3, 1859, and March 2, 1867, November 22, 1973 and Sec. 1800 of Revised Statutes). The project includes: administration; operation and maintenance of the collection, purification, pumping, and transmission facilities; protection of the water supply system; engineering; and construction of major water system additions and improvements. Authority to supply water to Arlington County, the City of Falls Church, and other jurisdictions in Virginia is contained in Public Law 119, 69th Congress, approved April 14, 1926; and Public Law 118, 80th Congress, June 26, 1947. Local cooperation. Prior to July 1, 1880, expenses of Washington Aqueduct for construction, operation, and maintenance were paid entirely out of revenues of the United States. From July 1, 1880 to June 30, 1882, one-half of the expenses of operation and maintenance were paid by the United States and the other half came from the general revenues of the District of Columbia. From July 1, 1882 to June 30, 1898, onehalf of construction costs were charged to a capital account on the books of the United States Treasury to be repaid by the District of Columbia from water rents with 3 percent interest. From July 1, 1898 to June 30, 1916, one half of the expense of construction, operation, and maintenance was paid by the United States Government. From July 1, 1916 to June 30, 1927, 60 percent of the expense of construction was paid from the general revenues of the District of Columbia and 40 percent was paid by the United States Government. From July 1, 1916 to January 22, 1976, all expenses of the operation and maintenance were paid from the Water Fund of the District of Columbia which was established by Congress to receive the water revenues from water consumed by the Federal Government, the District of Columbia, Arlington County, Va., and Falls Church, Va., as well as loans from the U.S. Treasury for Capital Improvements. From July 1, 1927 to January 22, 1976, all expenses for construction were paid from loans and revenues deposited in the Water Fund. Since January 22, 1976, expenses for operation and maintenance and construction have been paid from the General Fund. The Revenue Funds Availability Act of 1975, approved January 22, 1976, combined various District of Columbia special funds into one General Fund for the District of Columbia. Fiscal year 1948 through fiscal year 1954, pursuant to Public Law 195, 80th Congress, 1st Session, $1,000,000 was authorized each year for water consumed by the Federal Government. Public Law 364, 83rd Congress, 2nd Session, known as the "District of Columbia Public Works Act of 1954," provided for payment by the United States for all water and water services furnished within the District of Columbia at the rates applicable to other consumers in the District of Columbia. For water used outside the District, the rates applicable are those charged in the respective local jurisdictions within which the Federal facilities are situated. Operations and results during fiscal year. An uninterrupted and adequate supply of purified water was furnished to the District of Columbia; Arlington County, and Falls Church, Virginia; and to Federal establishments in the District of Columbia, Arlington County, Virginia and Montgomery and Prince Georges Counties in Maryland. Total consumption for Fiscal Year 1981 was 76,267 million gallons: the maximum daily consumption was 271 million gallons and average daily consumption was 208.9 million gallons. The amount furnished Arlington County and Falls Church, Virginia was 39.48 million 4-19 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 gallons per day. The Corps of Engineers was reimbursed in the amount of $3,160,652 for water furnished to the Virginia communities by the Washington Aqueduct. On June 23, 1952, fluoridation equipment was placed in service. The application of fluoride to the water supply has been continuous since that date. Average turbidity of raw water from the Potomac River was 11 Formazin Turbidity Units and the average Most Probable Number of coliform bacteria per 100 milliliters was 12,643. After treatment, the average turbidity of the filtered water was 0.32 and the average Most Probable Number of coliform bacteria per 100 milliliters was 0.02. The average calcium carbonate alkalinity of the filtered water was 71 milligrams per liter and the average pH value was 7.4. Average hardness was 146 milligrams per litre. Analyses were made from coliform bacteria on water taken from 220 sampling points in the collection, purification, and distribution systems. During Fiscal Year 1981 direct operating cost of water treated and delivered to the system per million gallons was $145.91. Similar costs during Fiscal Year 1980 was $134.60 per million gallons. Visitors. During the year, 341 persons toured the water supply facilities. Condition at end of fiscal year. The intakes, conduits, reservoirs, filter plants, pumping stations, mechanical equipment, and structures were generally in good condition. The status of construction work authorized with "no year" funds at the end of FY 81 was 20 percent complete for the Water Treatment Plant Wastewater Disposal and 5 percent complete for the McMillan Water Treatment Plant Replacement. General Investigations 47. SURVEYS Costs for the period were $4,844,651 of which $96,424 was for navigation studies, $474,589 for flood damage prevention studies, $28,159 for shoreline protection studies, $3,290,114 for special studies, $423,952 for comprehensive basin studies, $36 for review for deauthorization, $267,437 for coordination with other agencies and non-Federal interests, and $263,940 for supplemental preauthorization (Phase I) studies. 48. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Costs for flood plain management activities and general planning guidance during the period was $184,285. Providing assistance and guidance to local interests on methods and procedures for preventing and reducing flood damages was in progress at end of fiscal year. The national program of inspection of dams, authorized by Public Law 92-367, was continued in fiscal year 1981. Expenditures under this program totaled $2,201,488, of which $2,265,366 was for inspection of dams and $63,878 was for inventory of dams. 4-20 BALTIMORE, MD., DISTRICT TABLE 4-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to in Text Project Funding FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 Sept. 30, 1981 1. Baltimore Harbor and Channels, Md. and Va. 2. Baltimore Harbor Md. Collection & Removal of Drift 3. Black Walnut Harbor, Md. 4. Chester River, Md. 5. Duck Point Cove, Md. 6. Harbor of Baltimore, Md. Prevention of Obstructions and Injurious Deposits 7. Herring Bay & Rockhold Creek, Md. New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 8. Honga River and New Work Tar Bay (Barren Approp. Island Gaps), Md. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 9. Island Creek, St. New Work Georges Island, Approp. Md. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 10. Knapps Narrows, Md. New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 530,000 503,514 937,5752 934,7283 141,053 140,806 13,387 13,387 184,602 184,602 199,015 199,660 160,000 233,939 203,8804 211,6086 161,000 160,268 25,000 86,190 4,287,4386 3,799,863' 197,089 198,013 5,879,000 5,892,023 2,795,1098 3,277,1469 44,292,7151 44,283,425' 28,079,51110 28,071,85510 151,300 2,219,010 150,241 2,216,434 22,906 21,019 191,225 191,225 25,943 25,943 25,906 25,906 248,254 248,254 8,594 8,594 289,447 289,251 7,479 7,479 7,676 25,276 196 58,225 58,225 17,174 17,174 202,940 201,003 306,902 306,902 32,631 32,631 92,435 90,548 - 70,49511 - 70,495" 335,000 1,103,325 330,427 1,098,752 15,000 14,358 25,289 25,289 64,964 64,323 306,300 3,875,040 306,191 3,874,931 - 50,591 - 50,591 45,075 158,551 42,813 156,289 - 66,11912 - 66,11912 57,881 969,684 55,917 967,719 - 6,230 - 6,230 - 317,210 1,799 317,071 - 46,12118 - 46,1211" 55,608 941,134 54,261 939,787 4-21 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 4-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to in Text Project Funding FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 Sept. 30, 1981 11. Little Wicomico River, Va. 12. Ocean City Harbor and Inlet and Sinepuxent Bay, Md. 13. Monroe Bay and Creek, Va. 14. Neale Sound, Md. 15. Potomac and Anacostia Rivers, D.C., Collection & Removal of Drift 16. Rock Hall Harbor, Md. 17. Slaughter Creek, Md. 18. St. Catherines Sound, Md. 19. St. Jeromes Creek, Md. 20. Tilghman Island Harbor, Md New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Contrib. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 130,000 134,179 217,120 217,073 12,339 12,339 555,955 556,101 383,859 383,859 9,806 9,806 7,128 7,128 333,354 341,041 4,141 4,141 335,285 332,502 36,000 32,600 579 579 4,159 4,159 6,885 6,885 58,136 58,136 339,308 403,024 84,000 85,596 20,262 20,262 18,708 18,708 158,191 120,616 5,215 5,215 367,473 367,473 - 81,88514 - 81,88514 54,390 548,131 54,133 547,874 - 350,19316 - 350,19316 801,000 5,612,408 797,873 5,609,281 - 12,460 - 12,460 13,354 100,614 12,153 99,413 - 12,60016 - 12,60016 51,904 132,841 49,742 130,680 468,300 4,095,375 452,506 4,079,581 700,000 1,125,16017 343,219 762,74217 - 75,08818 - 75,08818 715,000 715,000 240,000 240,000 - 4,140 - 4,140 137,178 267,572 137,093 267,486 - 29,94719 - 29,94719 - 231,740 22,367 216,532 - 44,35720 - 44,35720 11,137 111,734 9,936 110,533 45,000 181,83021 33,845 167,36621 - 368,306 - 368-306 4-22 BALTIMORE, MD., DISTRICT TABLE 4-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to in Text Project Funding FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 Sept. 30, 1981 21. Twitch Cove and Big Thorofare, Md. 22. Washington Harbor, D.C. 23. Wicomico River, Md. 27. Colonial Beach, Va. 29. Bloomington Lake, North Branch Potomac River Md. & W. Va. 30. Bull Run, Pa. (Contributed Funds) 31. Cumberland, Md. and Ridgeley, W. Va. 32. Fourmile Run, Va. (Contributed Funds) 33A. Aylesworth Creek Lake, Pa. 34. Raystown Lake, Raystown Branch, Juniata River, Pa. New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 13,328 25,028 55,225 54,681 51,132 51,132 20,172 20,717 81,182 81,182 - 193,175 - 193,175 34,835 1,087,357 34,498 1,087,021 - 3,191,07722 - 3,191,00722 31,000 3,917,96423,24 28,444 3,915,40923,24 471,60925 471,60925 157,886 157,872 443,362 442,111 148,952 151,063 24,200,000 26,534,000 27,230,000 22,776,641 29,216,325 26,746,695 - - 10,000 - - 3,990 1,556,000 82,127 23,722 23,722 10,428,000 8,592,206 716,415 665,956 47,000 23,500 48,753 48,753 3,235,000 2,710,421 1,092,457 1,106,145 105,466 260,000 34,376 34,376 8,625,000 10,396,272 715,633 822,059 5,200 28,700 54,147 53,538 249,000 1,054,116 1,349,159 1,370,264 844,000 3,451,92726 831,869 3,439,79726 110,000 198,000 72,424 160,212 18,197,000 16,978,570 311,100 316,897 -350,000 1,473,000 973,795 1,052,535 - -260,000 106,000 -160,000 28,591 11,591 3,374,000 3,334,501 716,566 737,930 153,335 83,214 111,363 1,249,700 1,243,020 171,042,300 168,897,652 321,100 320,887 2,902,000 2,426,786 - 15,633,9702728 - 15,633,97027,28 37,900 358,699 52,363 356,162 666,000 49,202,300 616,904 49,048,308 - 2,924,842 67,299 2,924,842 - 2,320,400 - 2,320,400 49,700 553,777 119,729 553,076 - 77,408,700 - 77,408,700 1,503,300 7,435,501 1,348,765 7,254,150 4-23 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 4-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to in Text Project Funding FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 Sept. 30, 1981 35A. Addison, N.Y. New Work Approp. - - - - 827,050 Cost -- - - - 827,050 Maint. Approp. 9,851 15,575 9,981 21,377 97,306 Cost 9,851 15,575 9,981 14,814 90,743 35B. Almond Lake, New Work N.Y. Approp. - - - - 5,760,211 Cost - - - - 5,760,211 Maint. Approp. 151,618 141,767 167,543 122,600 1,793,968 Cost 169,752 140,381 166,122 124,646 1,792,845 35C. Arkport Dam, N.Y. New Work Approp. - - - - 1,910,00029 Cost - - - - 1,910,00029 Maint. Approp. 75,445 53,398 54,439 165,700 934,911 Cost 77,831 54,384 55,397 151,227 919,438 35D. Avoca, N.Y. New Work Approp. - - - - 436,37430 Cost - - - - 436,37430 Maint. Approp. 18,844 ,15,289 10,225 23,100 275,235 Cost 18,844 15,289 10,225 22,911 275,046 35E. Binghamton, N.Y. New Work Approp. - - - - 2,952,00031 Cost - - - - 2,952,00031' Maint. Approp. 16,165 16,142 17,197 27,900 286,881 Cost 16,165 16,142 17,197 25,193 284,174 35F. Canisteo, N.Y. New Work Approp. - - - - 1,183,11132 Cost - - - - 1,183,11132 Maint. Approp. 23,948 25,506 21,561 41,100 437,180 Cost 22,748 25,183 24,134 38,538 434,618 35G. Corning, N.Y. New Work Approp. - - - - 3,322,000 3 Cost - - - - 3,322,00033 Maint. Approp. 24,599 22,751 24,606 43,900 454,458 Cost 31,299 25,001 24,606 43,881 454,439 35H. East Sidney Lake, New Work N.Y. Approp. - - - - 6,049,504 Cost - - - - 6,049,504 Maint. Approp. 205,431 147,627 149,088 151,500 2,020,001 Cost 210,505 146,521 149,174 153,272 2,019,846 35I. Elmira, N.Y. New Work Approp. - - -5,000 - 6,883,305 Cost 99,611 16,871 - - 6,883,305 Maint. Approp. 10,022 5,231 12,519 18,100 151,449 Cost 10,022 5,231 12,519 13,994 147,343 35J. Hornell, N.Y. New Work Approp. - - - - 4,558,6983" Cost - - - - 4,558,69834 Maint. Approp. 124,296 126,369 664,200 60,800 2,166,393 Cost 123,096 92,008 277,799 481,037 2,163,618 4-24 BALTIMORE, MD., DISTRICT TABLE 4-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to in Text Project Funding FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 Sept. 30, 1981 35K. Lisle, N.Y. 35L. Oxford, N.Y. 35M. Whitney Point Lake, N.Y. 35N. Whitney Point Village, N.Y. 36. Stillwater Lake, Lackawanna River, Pa. 37A. Cowanesque Lake, Pa. 37B. Tioga-Hammond Lakes, Pa. 38A. Alvin R. Bush Dam, Pa. 38B. Curwensville Lake, Pa. 38C. Foster Joseph Sayers Dam, Pa. New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 661,19935 661,19986 13,683 13,683 9,341 9,341 214,014 213,898 12,473 12,473 96,175 98,880 15,900 15,900 10,464 10,464 263,368 269,145 12,728 12,728 98,948 98,203 28,081 28,081 8,536 8,536 122,667 117,866 10,582 10,582 88,204 88,943 21,777,000 24,490,000 10,913,000 20,226,177 28,866,737 10,679,151 - - 90,700 - - 82,245 20,285,000 11,710,000 20,049,495 16,455,618 152,252 456,325 152,066 440,151 113,915 116,527 179,337 182,294 271,590 311,999 155,381 148,574 309,555 301,301 266,048 7,455,000 7,194,556 646,324 656,397 135,880 142,132 510,821 519,199 331,200 266,444 32,300 512,622 30,241 510,563 - 131,00036 - 131,00036 21,624 132,332 21,624 132,332 - 5,421,539 - 5,421,539 161,500 2,385,097 167,763 2,384,228 - 424,096 - 424,096 22,900 200,561 18,780 196,441 - 5,725,700 - 5,725,700 111,000 1,156,069 111,920 1,155,952 2,878,000 2,438,893 481,200 482,553 355,000 292,233 819,900 817,049 105,760,700 104,754,499 571,900 564,798 185,929,800 185,230,857 2,074,801 2,065,663 - 7,103,001 - 7,103,001 200,600 2,017,412 200,761 2,016,073 - 20,396,060 - 20,396,060 236,400 3,561,298 232,284 3,555,740 - 30,887,063x7 - 30,887,063x7 314,000 2,805,515 383,567 2,804,899 4-25 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 4-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to in Text Project Funding FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 Sept. 30, 1981 39. Wyoming Valley, New Work Pa. Approp. 320,000 - - - 320,00098 Cost 273,751 46,249 - - 320,000"9 40. York, Cordorus New Work Creek, Pa. Approp. - - - - 5,061,16740 Cost - - - - 5,061,167' Maint. Approp. 165,495 191,874 279,952 248,100 2,826,37341 Cost 169,725 203,717 281,082 248,152 2,825,2124' 45. Potomac Estuary New Work Pilot Water Treat- Approp. 4,000,000 2,506,000 2,100,000 3,500,000 13,996,000 ment Plant, D.C. Cost 3,844,078 2,916,639 1,891,094 3,193,963 12,863,638 1. Includes $8,764,003 for previous projects. 22. Includes $3,029,001 for previous project. 2. Includes $20,000 for sections of project in Norfolk 23. Includes $1,831;609 for previous project. District. 24. Excludes $4,000 for emergency dredging under provi- 3. Includes $16,857 for sections of project in Norfolk sions of Section 3, 1945 River and Harbor Act. District. 25. Includes $50,000 for previous project and excludes 4. Includes -$12 for sections of project in Norfolk District. $14,000 contributed funds. 5. Includes $3,330 for sections of project in Norfolk 26. Excludes $33,000 contributed funds. District. 27. Includes $49,998 emergency relief funds. 6. Includes $32,000 for sections of project in Norfolk 28. Excludes $1,402,001 contributed funds and $197,513 District. public works acceleration funds. 7. Includes $30,931 for sections of project in Norfolk 29. Includes $62,577 emergency relief funds. District. 30. Includes $109,944 emergency relief funds. 8. Includes $14,109 for sections of project in Norfolk 31. Excludes $163,096 contributed funds. District. 32. Includes $207,520 rehabilitation funds. 9. Includes $15,177 for sections of project in Norfolk 33. Excludes $34,729 contributed funds. District. 34. Includes $250,899 emergency relief funds and excludes 10. Includes $399,802 for previous projects. $15,000 contributed funds. 11. Includes $38,041 for previous projects. 35. Includes $71,557 emergency relief funds. 12. Excludes $2,200 contributed and includes $27,668 36. Includes $73,465 emergency relief funds. emergency relief funds. 37. Excludes $263,900 contributed funds in accordance 13. Includes $46,121 public works funds. with the Tri-party Agreement for construction of sanitary 14. Excludes $5,000 contributed funds.. system for public use. 15. Includes $283,008 public works funds and $67,185 38. Excludes $1,125,000 for Phase I under General emergency, relief funds; excludes $500,000 contributed funds. Investigations beginning October 1, 1978. 16. Excludes $1,000 contributed funds. 39. Excludes $1,106,083 for Phase I under General 17. Includes $87,757 for previous project. Investigations beginning October 1, 1978. 18. Includes $9,762 for previous project. 40. Includes $11,588 emergency relief funds. 19. Excludes $600 contributed funds. 41. Includes $15,000 for deferred maintenance. 20. Includes $26,500 for previous project. 21. Includes $30 for previous project and excludes $14,200 contributed funds. TABLE 4-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents BALTIMORE HARBOR AND CHANNELS, MD. and VA. (See Section 1 of Text) Aug. 8, 1917 Branch channel 35 feet deep to head of Curtis Bay, and one 35 feet deep and H. Doc. 799, 400 feet wide from Fort McHenry to Port Covington entrance channel, 64th Cong., 1st sess. thence 150 feet wide to Ferry Bar, and thence 27 feet deep and 150 feet wide to Hanover Street Bridge, widen approaches and bends, and enlarge anchorage basin near entrance. Inclusion of Patapsco River and tributaries into one project for Baltimore Harbor.2 4-26 BALTIMORE, MD. DISTRICT TABLE 4-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Jan. 21, 1927 Jul. 3, 1930 Jul. 3, 1930 Oct. 17, 1940 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Change in location of anchorage near upper end of Fort McHenry Channel. Increased anchorage facilities. For 37-foot depth in that portion of channel to Baltimore lying between 37-foot depth curve near Baltimore Light to Sparrows Point entrance channel; widen angle between Fort McHenry and Ferry Bar Section; and for width of 400 feet in Curtis Bay section. For 22-, 18-, and 15-foot channels in Curtis Creek from 22-foot depth below Pennington Ave. Bridge to upper end of marginal wharf of U.S. Ordnance Depot. Uniform main channel 39-feet deep from the ocean through York Spit section and Craighill entrance to Fort McHenry, additional anchorage area, 2,400 feet long, 1,200 feet wide, and 30 feet deep; a connecting channel 400 feet wide and 27 feet deep from Cutoff Brewerton Angle in main channel to Inland Waterway from Delaware River to Chesapeake Bay; a channel in Curtis Creek 200 feet wide and 35 feet deep from head of existing 35-foot project channel in Curtis Bay to a point in the creek about 750 feet below Pennington Ave. Bridge. A channel 22 feet deep and 200 feet wide from 22-foot depth curve south of Baltimore & Ohio R.R. bridge about 2,800 feet to vicinity of Arundel Cove, thence 100 feet wide in Arundel Cove for about 2,100 feet; with an anchorage basin about 700 feet square adjacent to channel southwesterly of Coast Guard wharf. Main channel 42 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide in Cape Henry section at entrance to Chesapeake Bay and in York Spit section; 42 feet deep and 800 feet wide in Rappahannock Spit section and in approach channel to Baltimore Harbor from Craighill entrance to Fort McHenry, with widening at entrance and bends; channels 42 feet deep and 600 feet wide in Curtis Bay and Ferry Bar sections of harbor; a connecting channel 35 feet deep and 600 feet wide from main channel to approach channel to Chesapeake and Delaware Canal; and for three disjointed sections of channels of same depth and width in Chesapeake Bay leading to Chesapeake and Delaware Canal; and to provide Federal maintenance of 39-foot depth in Northwest Branch, in areas dredged to that depth by local interests. Deepening of the Cape Henry Channel to 50 feet at the existing width of 1,000 feet, with widening at bends; deepening of the Spit Channel to 50 feet at the existing width of 1,000 feet, with widening at bends; enlargement of the Rappahannock Shoal Channel to a depth of 50 feet and a width of 1,000 feet; deepening of the main ship channel from Chesapeake Bay to Fort McHenry to a depth of 50 feet at the existing width of 800 feet, with widening at bends and at the Craighill Entrance; deepening of the Curtis Bay Channel to a depth of 50 feet at the existing width of 600 feet, and deepening of the 950-foot wide and 980-foot long turning basin at the head of channel to the same depth; deepening of the Northwest Branch-East Channel to a depth of 49 feet from the depth existing at the time of construction at a width of 600 feet, and deepening of the 950-foot wide and 950-foot long turning basin at the head of the channel to the same depth; and deepening and extension of the Northwest Branch--West Channel to a depth of 40 feet from the depth existing at the time of construction, at a width of 600 feet, and with an irregularly shaped turning basin at the head of the channel 40 feet deep and about 2,000 feet long with a maximum width of 1,150 feet. BALTIMORE HARBOR, MD.-COLLECTION AND REMOVAL OF DRIFT (See Section 2 of Text) Collection and removal of drift from Baltimore Harbor and its tributary waters. BLACK WALNUT HARBOR, MD. (See Section 3 of Text) A channel 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide to and including an anchorage basin of same depth 400 feet square. 4-27 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 11, 70th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 86, 85th Cong., 1st sess. Adopted as a national defense project. (No printed report.) H. Doc. 741, 79th Cong., 2nd sess. In accordance with plans on file in the Office, Chief of Engineers. H. Doc. 86, 85th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 181, 94th Cong., 1st sess. River and Harbor Act of 1948. H. Doc, 217, 76th Cong., 1st sess. July. 3, 1958 Dec. 31, 1970 Jun. 30, 1948 Mar. 2, 1945 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 4-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 3, 1873 Sep. 19, 1980 Jun. 30, 1948 Mar. 2, 1945 Aug. 28, 1958 Jul. 3, 1930 Jun. 20, 1938 Aug. 30, 1935 Jun. 30, 1948 Mar. 2, 1945 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935k CHESTER RIVER, MD. (See Section 4 of Text) A channel 7 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide from Chester River to Eastern Bay through Kent Island Narrows. A channel 6 feet deep at mean low water and 60 feet wide from Crumpton to Jones Landing. A channel 7 feet deep at mean low water and 75 feet wide extending from the 7-foot depth in Kent Island Narrows 800 feet into Wells Cove with a basin of the same depth and 300 feet square at the head of the channel. DUCK POINT COVE, MD. (See Section 5 of Text) A channel 60 feet wide and 6 feet deep, from that depth in Fox Creek to a mooring basin of same depth, 100 feet wide and 300 feet long, roughly parallel to county road at head of waterway. HARBOR OF BALTIMORE, MD. PREVENTION OF OBSTRUCTIONS (See Section 6 of Text) Continuous patrol and inspection of Baltimore Harbor, Chesapeake Bay, and its tributaries to prevent and detect violations, and issue permits as required for transporting and depositing waste materials in navigable waters. (The project is limited to the tidal waters of Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries that lie within the State of Maryland.) HERRING BAY & ROCKHOLD CREEK, MD. (See Section 7 of Text) A channel 60 feet wide, 5 feet deep, from the 6-foot contour in Herring Bay to the 3-foot contour in Rockhold Creek. For the present project channel dimensions, 7 feet deep and 60 feet wide, the turning basin 7 feet deep, and a stone breakwater 900 feet long. HONGA RIVER AND TAR BAY (BARREN ISLAND GAPS), MD. (See Section 8 of Text) Channel 60 feet wide and 7 feet deep from the 7-foot contour in Chesapeake Bay through Tar Bay and Fishing Creek to the 7-foot contour in Honga River. Modification providing for a channel in Back Creek 7 feet deep and 60 feet wide from the 7-foot depth curve in Honga River to a point near the head of Back Creek, with a turning basin of the same depth, 150 feet long and 200 feet wide. ISLAND CREEK, ST. GEORGES ISLAND, MD. (See Section 9 of Text) A channel 5 feet deep and 50 feet wide through the entrance to Island Creek with an anchorage basin of same depth, 200 feet wide, and 500 feet long in the creek. KNAPPS NARROWS, MD. (See Section 10 of Text) A channel 9 feet deep at mean low water, 75 feet wide, widened at the bends from deep water in Chesapeake Bay to deep water in Harris Creek, Md., with a turning basin west of the drawbridge, 7 feet deep at mean low water, about 320 feet long and 120 feet wide. Project channel was authorized by the Public Works Administration September 16, 1933 and later adopted by 1935 River and Harbor Act. LITTLE WICOMICO RIVER, VA (See Section 11 of Text) A channel 8 feet deep and 150 feet wide from Potomac River to deep water in Little Wicomico River; two stone jetties 1,000 feet and 1,300 feet long at the entrance; and 1,004 linear feet of timber bulkhead to stabilize the dredged inner channel. OCEAN CITY HARBOR & INLET & SINEPUXENT BAY, MD. (See Section 12 of Text) Construction of an inlet between the Atlantic Ocean and Sinepuxent Bay, 10 feet deep and 200 feet wide, protected by jetties; a channel 8 feet deep and 100 feet wide from the inlet to Ocean City, 6 feet deep and 150 feet wide to Green Point, and 100 feet wide into Chincoteague Bay. 4-28 E. Doc. 25, 42d. Cong., 3d sess. H. Ex. Doc. 65, 51st. Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 380, 80th Cong., 1st sess.' H. Doc. 241, 76th Cong., 1st sess. River and Harbor Act, June 29, 1888 as amended by Public Law 85-802, dated August 28, 1958. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 34, 71st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 595, 75th Cong., 3rd sess.' Rivers and Harbors Committee, Doc. 35, 74th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 580, 80th Cong., 2nd sess.' H. Doc. 99, 76th Cong., 1st sess.' H. Doc. 308, 72nd Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 24, 74th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 38, 72d Cong., 1st sess. BALTIMORE, MD. DISTRICT TABLE 4-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Aug. 30, 19354 Sep. 3, 19546 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 26, 1937 Oct. 27, 1965 Aug. 26, 1937 Jun. 30, 1948 May 29, 1980 Sec. 107 Jul. 14, 1960 Jul. 25, 1912 Mar. 2, 1945 Aug. 26, 1937 Modification providing a 10-foot by 100-foot channel from the inlet to the west side of the bay with 2 turning basins; a channel 6 feet deep and 125 feet wide from the inlet channel to opposite North 8th Street, Ocean City, and 75 feet wide into Isle of Wight Bay. Modification providing for raising the north jetty to an elevation 9 feet above mean low water, and a channel 300 feet wide and 16 feet deep from the ocean through the inlet to the Isle of Wight Bay channel, thence 200 feet to the project harbor, and a depth of 14 feet in the project harbor. Channel depths refer to project datum. MONROE BAY AND CREEK, VA. (See Section 13 of Text) A channel 8 feet deep, 100 wide, and 950 feet long, through the bar at the entrance, and within the creek a channel 7 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and 2,500 feet long, with turning and anchorage basin 500 feet wide at upper end. NEALE SOUND, MD. (See Section 14 of Text) Channel 7 feet deep and 100 feet wide through lower entrance into Wicomico River and a second channel 6 feet deep at upper entrance extending from deep water within the sound through a marshy barrier at head of Cobb Island to deep water in the Potomac with widths of 60 feet within the sound and 80 feet elsewhere. POTOMAC & ANACOSTIA RIVERS, D.C. -COLLECTION & REMOVAL OF DRIFT (See Section 15 of Text) Collection and removal of drift from waters of the Potomac and Anacostia Rivers and their tributaries in the Washington, D.C. area from the head of the tidewater to Mount Vernon, Virginia. ROCK HALL HARBOR, MD. (See Section 16 of Text) Channel 60 feet wide and 7 feet deep from that depth in Swan Point Inlet to a channel of the same dimensions, 700 feet in length parallel to the harbor terminals at Rock Hall; an anchorage basin of the same depth 100 feet wide and about 800 feet long in northwesterly extension of the channel fronting the harbor terminals; and twin breakwaters at the harbor entrance. Deepening the approach channel to 10 feet and widening to 100 feet from the 10-foot contour in Swan Creek Inlet to the existing channel parellel to the harbor terminals; deepening to 10 feet and widening to 100 feet the existing channel parallel to the harobr terminals; deepening to 10 feet the eastern 250 feet of the present basin; deepening to 8 feet the western 350 feet of the present basin; and a new anchorage basin 600 feet long, 200 feet wide and 8 feet deep attached to and extending from the west end of the existing basin. Raising the existing west and east breakwaters from four feet to seven feet above mean low water and extending the west breakwater 400 feet at an elevation of seven feet above mean low water; relocating the existing entrance channel at a depth of 8 feet and width of 100 feet; a new channel, 8 feet deep and 100 feet wide, from the new entrance channel to the existing anchorage basin; a new channel, 8 feet deep and 100 feet wide, from the end of the existing channel near the County wharf to and including an anchorage basin, 250 feet square, in the eastern end of the harbor. SLAUGHTER CREEK, MD. (See Section 17 of Text) A channel 7 feet deep and 100 feet wide at mean low water through the bar at the mouth, a distance of about one-third of a mile, the lower end of the section extending about 900 feet into Little Choptank River. ST. CATHERINES SOUND, MD. (See Section 18 of Text) Channel 6 feet deep, 100 feet wide and 700 feet long at the lower entrance from the Potomac River and a channel 6 feet deep, 80 feet wide and 3,330 feet long at the Upper entrance from the Wicomico River. ST. JEROMES CREEK, MD. (See Section 19 of Text) A channel 7 feet deep and 100 feet wide at Airedele, thence 7 feet deep and 60 feet wide to deep water in the creek, with a turning basin of the same depth 200 feet wide and 300 feet long opposite Airedele. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 60, 74th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 444, 82d Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc, 172, 70th Cong., 1st sess.1 H. Doc. 159, 75th Cong., 1st sess.' H. Doc. 286, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 204, 75 Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 273, 80th Cong., 1st sess.' Detailed Project Report, December, 1978 H. Doc. 87, 62nd Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 242, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 174, 75th Cong., 1st sess.' 4-29 Documents REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 4-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents May 13, 1966 Sec. 107 Jul. 14, 1960 Oct. 20, 1980 Sec. 107 Jul. 14, 1960 Jul. 25, 1912 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Jun. 20, 1938 May 17, 1950 Aug. 30, 1935 Sep. 19, 1890 Jun. 25, 1910 Mar. 2, 1919 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 26, 1937 Sep. 3, 1954 TILGHMAN ISLAND HARBOR, MD. (See Section 20 of Text) A channel 60 feet wide and 6 feet deep from that depth in Harris Creek to and including two anchorage basins of the same depth, 300 feet by 70 feet and 500 feet by an average width of 110 feet. Modification to provide for construction of a breakwater at the harbor entrance. TWITCH COVE AND BIG THOROFARE, MD. (See Section 21 of Text) A channel 4 feet deep and 25 feet wide from Tangier Sound into Big Thorofare River, and one of same dimensions around point between said river and Tyler River. A channel 5 feet deep at mean low water and 25 feet wide from Twitch Cove on Tangier Sound through Big Thorofare River to a point on Levering Creek about 800 feet north of canal at Ewell, Md. A channel 7 feet deep and 60 feet wide from Twitch Cove through Big Thorofare River to a point on Levering Creek about 800 feet north of canal at Ewell, Md. Present project dimensions of main channel with twin jetties at entrance. Anchorage basin 7 feet deep, 100 feet wide and 700 feet long'on west side of project channel at Ewell, Md., and an extension of existing project channel in Levering Creek, 6 feet deep, 60 feet wide, and 1,000 feet long. WASHINGTON HARBOR, D.C. (See Section 22 of Text) Provides for: (a) Virginia Channel, from Giesboro Point to area for 25,000 square feet; (b) Washington Channel, from Haines Point to head of Washington Channel, 24 feet deep and 400 feet wide; (c) Anacostia River from Giesboro Point to Anacostia Bridge, 24 feet deep and 400 feet wide, with turning basin 800 feet wide and about 2,400 feet long of same depth opposite Naval Weapons Plant; (d) Anacostia River from Anacostia Bridge 24 feet deep and 200 feet wide to turning basin 400 feet square of same depth at foot of 15th Street S.E. Channel lengths including turning basins are: Virginia Channel, 25,000 feet; Washington Channel, 10,000 feet; and Anacostia River, 15,000 feet; and (e) operation and maintenance of inlet gates and lock and outlet gates of Tidal Basin constructed under a previous project to flush Washington Channel. WICOMICO RIVER, MD. (See Section 23 of Text) Channel 9 feet deep from Main Street Bridge to about 2 miles below. Extend 9-foot depth into north prong from Main Street Bridge to the Salisbury Dam and turning basin. Extend 9-foot depth into south prong to head of navigation at Cathell St., including a turning basin, and extend project down to mouth of river in Monie Bay. A 12-foot channel below the Main Street Bridge. A 14-foot channel, 150 feet wide; depths of 14 feet in the north and south prongs and a basin 6 feet deep at Webster Cove and approach channel thereto of the same depth. Enlarge existing basin at Webster Cove, by dredging an extension 6 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and 200 feet long on each side of existing basin to form a T-shaped harbor. 4-30 Detailed Project Report, August 1965. Detailed Project Report, July 1980. H. Doc. 285, 62d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 313, 71st Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 67, 74th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers & Harbors Committee Doc. 49, 75th Cong., 2d sess.' H. Doc. 340, 81st Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 22, 74th Cong., 1st sess.2 H. Doc. 20, 51st Cong., 1st sess., and Annual Report 1890, p. 947. H. Doc. 569, 61st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 1509, 63rd Cong., 3rd sess. Senate Committee Print, 75th Cong., 3rd sess.1 H. Doc. 619, 81st Cong., 2d sess.' BALTIMORE, MD. DISTRICT TABLE 4-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Sep. 15, 1980 Oct. 23, 1962 Dec. 2, 1976 Jun. 22, 1936 Jul. 24, 1946 Jun. 25, 1970 Jul. 14, 1970 Mar. 7, 1974 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 June 22, 1936 modified by Acts of June 28, 1938; Aug. 18, 1941; Dec. 22, 1944; May 17, 1950; and July 3, 1958 Aug. 18, 1941 Jul. 3, 1958 COLONIAL BEACH, VA. (See Section 27 of Text) Extending and widening the existing Central Beach area, stabilizing the bank behind the beachfill with vegetation, and constructing four segments of offshore breakwater; and extending and widening of the existing Castle Beach area, constructing three segments of offshore breakwater, removing debris in the beachfill area, and constructing a 100-foot long terminal groin at the southern end of Castlewood Park beachfill. BLOOMINGTON LAKE, MD. & W. VA. (See Section 29 of Text) Construction of Bloomington Lake project. BULL RUN, PA. (See Section 30 of Text) Consists of an impervious core incorporated in the proposed highway embankment of the Williamsport Beltway to utilize it as a levees, closure structures, pumping stations and tie-back levees. CUMBERLAND, MD. AND RIDGELEY, W. VA (See Section 31 of Text) Levees, retaining walls, movable dam, and channel clearing for Cumberland, West Cumberland and South Cumberland, Md., and Ridgeley, W. VA. Levees, wall, channel improvement, remove Chesapeake and Ohio Canal Dam and construct new industrial dam. FOURMILE RUN, VA. (See Section 32 of Text) Construction of a levee and floodwall protection system with associated interior drainage facilities, an improved channel, and replacement of two highway and four railroad bridges. Modification providing for channel capacity of 27,000 c.f.s.; increase channel bottom widths along Fourmile Run; deletion of pumping stations, ponding areas, and levees, except for a short levee on Long Branch; and the addition of recreation as a project feature. LACKAWANNA RIVER BASIN, PA (See Section 33 of Text) Construction of Aylesworth Creek Lake, Fall Brook Lake, and local protection works on Lackawanna River at Scranton, Pennsylvania. RAYSTOWN LAKE, RAYSTOWN BRANCH, JUNIATA RIVER, PA. (See Section 34 of Text) Construction of dam and appurtenant facilities. SOUTHERN NEW YORK FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 35 of Text) Construction of detention reservoirs and related flood control works for protection of Binghamton, Hornell, Corning and other towns in New York and Pennsylvania. STILLWATER LAKE, LACKAWANNA RIVER, PA. (See Section 36 of Text) Construction of a flood control reservoir. SUSQUEHANNA RIVER FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS, N.Y. AND PA. (See Section 37 of Text) Construction of Cowanesque and Tioga-Hammond reservoirs, local flood protection works at Elkland, Pa., and Nichols, N.Y. and channel improvement at Cortland, N.Y. Detailed Project Report, May, 1980 H. Doc. 469, 87th Cong., 2d sess. Detailed Project Report October 1976. H. Doc. 101, 73rd Cong., 1st sess. Report on file in Office Chief of Engineers. H. Doc. 358, 91st Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 141, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 565, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 702, 77th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 702, 77th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 394, 84th Cong., 2d sess. 4-31 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 4-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Oct. 22, 1976 Modification in connection with the construction of Cowanesque Lake to relocate the Town of Nelson, Pa., to a new townsite. WEST BRANCH OF SUSQUEHANNA RIVER, PA. (See Section 38 of Text) Sep. 3, 1954 Construction of three flood control reservoirs. H. Doc. 29, 84th Cong., 1st sess. WYOMING VALLEY, PA. (See Section 39 of Text) Oct. 22, 1976 Authorized the phase I design memorandum stage of advance engineering H. Doc. 482, and design. 94th Cong., 2d sess. YORK, CODORUS CREEK, PA. (See Section 40 of Text) June 22, 1936 Construction of Indian Rock Dam and channel improvements on Codorus H. Doc. 702, Creek. 77th Cong., 2d sess. POTOMAC ESTUARY PILOT WATER TREATMENT PLANT, D.C. (See Section 45 of Text) Mar. 7, 1974 To construct, operate, and evaluate a pilot project on the Potomac Estuary H. Doc. 2, for the treatment of water at an estimated cost of $6,000,000. 93rd Cong., 1st sess. 1. Contains latest published maps. authorization was that opened just south of Ocean City by 2. Exclusive of portion considered inactive. Inactive natural forces during a severe storm in August 1933. This portion is widening 35-foot depth channel from 150 to 400 feet eliminated the necessity for an 8-foot channel from the inlet to from Port Covington to Ferry Bar, widening 27-foot depth Ocean City. channel from 150 to 250 feet to Hanover Street Bridge, and 4. Included in Emergency Relief program 1935. providing a channel 27 feet deep by 250 feet wide to Western 5. Raising of the north jetty to an elevation of 9 feet above Maryland Railway Bridge with an anchorage and turning mean low water was accomplished with maintenance funds in basin at the upper end. 1956. 3. Included in Public Works Administration program September 16, 1933. The site chosen for the inlet under this RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS TABLE 4-C (See Section 24 of Text) Date Survey Project Conducted DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Potomac River below Washington July 1981 MARYLAND Madison Bay June 1981 Muddy Hook and Tyler Coves July 1981 Nanticoke River at Bivalve December 1981 Nanticoke River (including Northwest Fork) November 1981 Northeast River March 1981 Parish Creek July 1981 Potomac River at Mount Vernon September 1981 St. Patricks Creek May 1981 Warwick River August 1981 VIRGINIA Bonum Creek April 1981 Branson Cove, Lower Machodoc River July 1981 Nomini Bay and Creek November 1980 4-32 BALTIMORE, MD. DISTRICT OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS TABLE 4-D (See Section 25 of Text) Cost To September 30, 1981 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and 4-33 Project Accontink Creek, Va.",2 Anacostia River and Flats3 Annapolis Harbor, Md.' Aquia Creek, Va.' Back Creek, Md.' Betterton Harbor, Md.' Bonum Creek, Va.' ' Branson Cove, Lower Machodoc River, Va.' Breton Bay, Md."2 Broad Creek River, Del.' Broad Creek, Md.' Broadwater Creek, Md." Cadle Creek, Md." Cambridge Harbor, Md."2 Channel connecting Plain Dealing Creek and Oak Creek, Md."4 Choptank River, Md."'~6 Claiborne Harbor, Md.3 Coan River, Va."4 Corsica River, Md.' Crisfield Harbor, Md.' Cuckold Creek, Md.'9 Cunninghill Cove, Md.' 9 Cypress Creek, Md.' Elk and Little Elk Rivers, Md.",20 Fishing Bay, Md.' Fishing Creek Md.' Goose Creek, Md.' ' Governor's Run, Md." Hellens Creek, Md." Herring Creek, Md.' Island Creek, Md.' Lake Ogleton, Md." La Trappe River, Md.' Lowes Wharf, Md.' Little Creek, Kent Island, Md.' Lower Machodoc Creek, Va.' Lower Thorofare, Deal Island, Md.' Madison Bay, Md.' 7 Manokin River, Md.1,26 Middle River and Dark Head Creek, Md.' Mill Creek, Md." Muddy Hook and Tyler Coves, Md.' 7 Nan Cove, Md.' 7' Nanticoke River at Bivalve, Md.",20 Nanticoke River (including Northwest Fork), Del. and Md.' Nanticoke River, Md.' Neabsco Creek, Md.' Neavitt Harbor, Md.' 7 Nomini Bay and Creek, Va.' ,s0 Northeast River, Md.' Occoquan Creek, Va.",2 ' Parish Creek, Md.' Patuxent River, Md.",2 ' Pocomoke River, Md.12 Potomac River and Tributaries at and below Washington, D.C., Elimination of Waterchestnut Potomac River at Alexandria, Va.' Potomac River at Lower Cedar Point, Md.' Potomac River at Mount Vernon, Va.'1,20 Report For 1878 1953 1946 1928 1946 1960 1971 1950 1950 1964 1962 1949 1949 1979 1940 1979 1978 1937 1948 1980 1978 1977 1947 1932 1979 1978 1973 1950 1950 1961 1948 1950 1980 1971 1958 1904 1980 1977 1919 1947 1949 1966 1965 1975 1976 1971 1978 1968 1946 1972 1971 1963 1905 1980 1977 1965 1920 1950 Construction $ 5,000 3,910,582 34,250' 52,4656 23,061 3,482 202,0008 15,755 47,9249 64,51010 28,227 195,97413 112 96,796 42,974 39,07116 349,15417 5,720 11,200 3,057 90,12121 33,874 111,242 75,900 284,80023 6,230 8,064 21,000 23,00024 9,916 44,65825 125,550 34,78827 38,71528 64,001 34,86129 240,817 143,1342" 73,243 14,600 36,500 78,446 28,48931 66,25332 19,17033 14,0003" 191,72636 95,214 10,324 17,000 Maintenance $ - 15,623 11,770 10,441 28,981 11,554 12,621 114,373 73,763 212 654,258 94,095 86,857 - 56,974 476,13318 - 3,787 44,89222 649,596 486,563 8,312 4,596 5,608 40,475 39,122 1,108 1,634 320,942 15,500 32,724 16,506 18,702 126,973 310,717 52,356 3,215 42,063 138,653 171,609 52,317 1,069,813 184,394 491,500 6,216 63,209 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS TABLE 4-D (Continued) - (See Section 25 of Text) Project Potomac River below Washington, D.C.' Potomac River North Side of Washington Channel, D.C.' ,2 Queenstown Harbor, Md.' Rhodes Point to Tylerton, Md.' Shad Landing State Park, Md.' St. George Creek, Md.' St. Michaels Harbor, Md."' St. Patricks Creek, Md.' St. Peters Creek, Md.''' Smith Creek, Md.' Susquehanna River at and below Havre de Grace, Md.' ,30 Susquehanna River at Williamsport, Pa."' 7 Town Creek, Md.' Tred Avon River, Md. Tuckahoe River, Md.' Tyaskin Creek, Md.' Upper Machodoc Creek, Va.' Upper Thorofare, Deal Island, Md.' Warwick River, Md.' Waterway from Little Choptank River to Choptank River, Md.14 1. Completed. 2. Unconstructed portion of the project was deauthorized August 5, 1977. 3. Project deferred for restudy. 4. Includes $8,476 for previous project. 5. Entire project inactive. 6. Includes $31,065 for previous project. 7. Authorized by Chief of Engineers. 8. Excludes $3,998 contributed funds. 9. Includes $37,500 for previous project. 10. Includes $50,000 for previous project. 11. Entire project deauthorized November 6, 1977. 12. Unconstructed portion of the project is inactive. 13. Includes $61,321 for previous project. 14. Entire project deauthorized August 5, 1977. 15. Authorization for the unconstructed portion of the project was withdrawn by the Chief of Engineers January 22, 1979. 16. Includes $30,000 for previous project. 17. Includes $87,740 for previous project. 18. Includes $2,839 for previous project. 19. Project authorization was withdrawn by the Chief of Engineers January 22, 1979. 20. Unconstructed portion of the project was deauthorized November 2, 1979. 21. Includes $79,626 for previous project and excludes $8,414 contributed fun:.. 22. Includes $24,321 for previous project. 23. Excludes $10,306 contributed funds. For Last Full Report See Annual Report For 1976 1956 1958 1978 1966 1971 1964 1956 1963 1936 1974 1974 1950 1979 1980 1923 1971 1980 1973 1939 Cost To September 30, 1981 Construction 153,836 1,744,69236 72,85838 155,366 33,53139 16,7230 15,752 1' 46,74042 5,252 293,570"3 57,031" 43,220 523,130 9,727 16,297" 20,281 62,446 22,04146 305 Operation and Maintenance 1,748,179 27,461"7 34,942 231,424 2,228 4,097 8,688 9,206 279 368,305 5,209 13,843 23,489 18,530 13,715 317,571 91,528 24. Excludes $1,100 contributed funds. 25. Includes $5,000 for previous project. 26. Abandonment recommended in 1926 (H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st sess.) 27. Includes $2,000 expended outside project limits. 28. Excludes $111,581 expended by Navy Department and $54,000 from contributed funds. 29. Excludes $565 contributed funds. 30. Unconstructed portion of the project was deauthorized November 6, 1977. 31. Includes $20,640 for previous project. 32. Includes $25,000 for previous project. 33. Includes $19,170 Works Progress Administration funds. 34. Includes $10,617 for previous project. 35. Includes $20,500 for previous project. 36. Excludes $389,000 contributed funds. 37. Excludes $101,162 Public Health Service funds expended for waterchestnut removal. 38. Includes $19,000 for previous project. 39. Excludes $24,125 contributed funds. 40. Excludes $600 contributed funds. 41. Excludes $1,000 contributed funds. 42. Excludes $6,984 contributed funds. 43. Includes $22,905 Works Progress Administration funds and $97,390 for previous project. 44. Excludes $40,000 contributed funds. 45. Includes $10,158 for previous project. 46. Includes $6,000 for previous project. 4-34 .__ BALTIMORE, MD. DISTRICT OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS TABLE 4-E (See Section 28 of Text) For Last Cost to September 30, 1981 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Oxford, Md.' "2 1978 $ 97,7503 1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers. 2. Completed. 3. Excludes $80,648 contributed funds. LACKAWANNA RIVER BASIN, PENNSYLVANIA (See Section 33 of Text) TABLE 4-F DAMS AND RESERVOIRS Estimated Federal Cost Miles Reservoir Estimated Nearest Above Height Capacity Lands and non-federal Name City River Mouth in feet (acre-feet) Construction damages Total costs Aylesworth2 Carbondale Aylesworth 1.0 90 1,700 $2,153,559 $114,641 $2,268,2003 Creek Fall Brook' Carbondale Fall Brook 1. Includes relocations. 2. Completed. 3. Excludes $52,200 for recreation facilities under the completed projects program. 4. Deauthorized May 6, 1981. LOCAL FLOOD PROTECTION WORKS Estimated Federal Cost Miles Estimated Above Lands and non-federal Location River Mouth Type of structure Construction damages Total costs Scranton, Pa.' Lackawanna 9 Levee and floodwall $2,006,800 - $2,006,800 $4,090,0002 1. Completed. 2. Includes $760,000 for required lands and relocations for Federal portion of project and $3,300,000 for dredging of Lackawanna River and constructing channel improvements on Roaring Brook and Stafford Meadow Brook by Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. 4-35 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 LACKAWANNA RIVER BASIN, PENNSYLVANIA COST OF NEW WORK AND MAINTENANCE TO SEPTEMBER 30, 1981 TABLE 4-G (See Section 33 of Text) Percentage of Construction Unit New Work Maintenance Completed' Reservoirs: Aylesworth $2,320,400 $ 553,076 100 (1970) Fall Brook2 46,1003 Local flood protection: Scranton 2,006,800 -- 100 (1969) Total $4,373,300 $ 553,076 1. Year operationally completed indicated in parentheses. 2. Deauthorized May 6, 1981. 3. Cost for preliminary work only. SOUTHERN NEW YORK FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 35 of Text) TABLE 4-H DAMS AND RESERVOIRS Estimated Federal Cost Miles Reservoir Nearest Above Height Capacity Lands and Name City River Mouth in Feet (acre-feet) Construction Damages 2 Total Davenport Centers Oneonta Charlotte Creek West Oneonta' Oneonta Otsego Creek East Sidney4 Sidney Ouleout Creek 4 146 33,550 $ 5,279,894 $ 587,244 $ 5,867,1386 Copes Corner' Sidney Butternut Creek Whitney Point4 Binghamton Otselic River 1 95 86,440 3,978,533 1,096,467 5,075,0006 Arkport' Hornell Canisteo River 50 113 7,900 1,777,732 132,268 1,910,000 Almond' Hornell Canacadea Creek 3 90 14,800 4,746,587 954,024 5,700,6117 Total $15,782,746 $2,770,003 $18,552,749 1. All dams are in New York State; all are earthfill type except East Sidney. 2. Includes relocations. 3. Deauthorized May 6, 1981. 4. Completed. 5. Exclusive of $182,366 for recreational facilities. 6. Exclusive of $346,539 for recreational facilities. 7. Exclusive of $59,600 for recreational facilities. 4-36 BALTIMORE, MD. DISTRICT LOCAL FLOOD PROTECTION WORKS Estimated Federal Cost Miles Estimated Location Above Lands and non-federal New York River Mouth Type of Structure Construction Damages Total Costs Oxford' Chenango 40 Levee and channel $ 96,944 $ 34,056 $ 131,000 $ 11,000 improvement Lisle' Tioughnioga 12 Wall, levee, and 605,000 56,199 661,199 68,000 channel realinement Whitney Point' Tioughnioga 10 Levee and channel 411,653 12,443 424,096 62,500 realinement Binghamton' Susquehanna 328 Wall, levee and 2,844,6822 107,318 2,952,0002 711,000 conduit Elmira Chemung 27 Wall, levee and 6,744,130 139,175 6,883,305 922,000 conduit Corning' Chemung 44 Wall, levee, flume 3,164,0003 158,000 3,322,0003 686,471 and conduit Painted Post' Cohocton - Wall, levee and 402,948 11,233 414,181 50,800 channel realinement Addison' Canisteo 8 Wall, levee and 814,236 12,814 827,050 125,000 channel realinement Bath' Cohocton 21 Wall and levee 638,332 - 638,332 43,700 Avoca' Cohocton 30 Levee, channel 406,589 29,785 436,374 69,300 improvement and realinement Canisteo' Canisteo 36 Levee and wall 1,125,750 57,361 1,183,111 35,000 Hornell' Canisteo 42 Wall, levee and 3,993,4524 565,246 4,558,6984 - channel realinement Total $21,247,716 $1,183,630 $22,431,346 $2,784,771 1. Completed. 2. Excludes contributed funds of $160,095 by City of Binghamton and $3,000 by Village of Port Dickinson. 3. Excludes $250,000 of construction by State of New York and $34,729 contributed funds by City of Corning on Monkey Run. 4. Excludes contributed funds of $15,000 by City of Hornell. SOUTHERN NEW YORK FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS COST OF NEW WORK AND MAINTENANCE TO SEPTEMBER 30, 1981 TABLE 4-I (See Section 35 of Text) Percentage of Construction Unit New Work Maintenance Completed Reservoirs: Davenport Center2 $ 286,4003 $ - - West Oneonta2 189,1003 East Sidney 6,049,504 2,019,846 100 (1950) Copes Corner2 160,7003 Whitney Point 5,421,539 2,384,228 100 (1942) Arkport 1,910,000 919,438 100 (1939) Almond 5,760,211 1,792,845 100 (1949) Local flood protection: Oxford 131,000 132,332 100 (1938) Lisle 661,199 510,563 100 (1948) Whitney Point Village 424,096 196,441 100 (1948) Binghamton 2,952,0004 284,174 100 (1943) Elmira 6,883,305 147,343 100 (1950) 4-37 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 SOUTHERN NEW YORK FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS COST OF NEW WORK AND MAINTENANCE TO SEPTEMBER 30, 1981 TABLE 4-I (Continued) (See Section 35 of Text) Percentage of Construction Unit New Work Maintenance Completed Corning 3,322,0006 454,439 100 (1955) Painted Post 414,181 17,890 100 (1938) Addison 827,050 90,743 100 (1947) Bath 638,332 - 100 (1948) Avoca 436,374 275,046 100 (1939) Canisteo 1,183,111 434,618 100 (1948) Hornell 4,558,69867 2,163,618 100 (1941) 8 Almond Village9 24,6223 - - Total $42,233,42210 $11,823,564 1. Year operationally completed indicated in parentheses. 6. Includes Canacadea Creek, Chauncey Run, and Crosby 2. Deauthorized May 6, 1981. Creek. 3. Cost for preliminary work only. 7. Does not include $15,000 contributed funds. 4. Does not include $163,096 contributed funds. 8. Installation of 'gates on outlets completed in 1955. 5. Includes Monkey Run. Excludes $250,000 of construc- 9. Local cooperation withdrawn, project authorization extion by State of New York and $34,729 contributed funds by pired May 26, 1953. City of Corning. 10. Does not include $212,825 contributed funds. SUSQUEHANNA RIVER FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS, NEW YORK AND PENNSYLVANIA (See Section 37 of Text) TABLE 4-J DAMS AND RESERVOIRS' Estimated Federal Cost Miles Reservoir Estimated Above Height Capacity Lands and non-federal Name City River Mouth in Feet (acre-feet) Construction Damages 2 Total costs Cowanesque Corning, Cowanesque 2 145 95,700 $ 60,820,000 $ 45,180,000 $106,000,000 - N.Y. River Tioga- Corning, Tioga River 20 125 130,000 134,300,000 58,400,000 192,700,000 - Hammond N.Y. Total $195,120,000 $103,580,000 $298,700,000 - 1. All dams are in Pennsylvania and of earthfill type. 2. Includes relocations. LOCAL FLOOD PROTECTION WORKS Federal Cost Miles Estimated Above Lands and non-federal Location River Mouth Type of structure Construction Damages Total costs Cortland, N.Y. Tioughnioga 30 Channel improvement $ 324,486 - $ 324,486 $ 52,300 Nichols, N.Y. Susquehanna 297 Levee 1,487,800 - 1,487,800 270,000 Elkland, Pa. Cowanesque 12 Levee 1,297,850 - 1,297,850 228,000 Total $3,110,136 - $3,110,136 $550,300 4-38 BALTIMORE, MD. DISTRICT SUSQUEHANNA RIVER FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS, NEW YORK AND PENNSYLVANIA COST OF NEW WORK AND MAINTENANCE TO SEPTEMBER 30, 1981 TABLE 4-K (See Section 37 of Text) Percentage of Construction Unit New Work Maintenance Completed' Reservoirs: Cowanesque $104,754,499 $ 564,798 99 (1980) Tioga-Hammond 185,230,857 2,065,663 97 (1978) Local flood protection: Cortland 324,486 - 100 (1963) Nichols 1,487,800 - 100 (1971) Elkland 1,297,850 - 100 (1966) Total $293,095,492 $2,630,461 1. Year operationally completed indicated in parentheses. WEST BRANCH OF SUSQUEHANNA RIVER, PA. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON INDIVIDUAL UNITS OF PROJECT TABLE 4-L (See Section 38 of Text) Reservoir Curwensville Alvin R. Bush Foster Joseph Sayers Nearest large community Stream distance from mouth of Susquehanna River Drainage area above dam Reservoir: Spillway elevation above m.s.1. Flood control capacity: Total area of reservoir Reservoir length at spillway crest Conservation pool area Relocation required Dam: Type Top elevation above m.s.l. Height above streambed Design freeboard Top length Spillway: Location Type Height above streambed Width Design discharge Outlet works: Location Type No. of conduits No. of gates Gate size Outlet Capacity Length of stilling basin Federal Cost: Construction Lands and damages Total Curwensville, Pa. 308 miles 365 sq. mi. 1,228 ft. 124,200 acre-ft. 3,020 acres 14 miles 540 acres Railroad, cementery, highway, utilities Earthfill 1,257.0 ft. 131 ft. 4.9 ft. 2,850 ft. Adjacent saddle Uncontrolled overflow 102 ft. 480 ft. 164,000 c.f.s. Left abutment Controlled 1 3 5.5 by 12 ft. 10,000 c.f.s. 82 ft. $10,255,450 10,170,610 $20,396,060 Renovo, Pa. 285 miles 226 sq. mi. 937 ft. 75,000 acre-ft. 1,430 acres 8.8 miles 160 acres Highway, utilities, cemetery Earthfill 967.7 ft. 165 ft. 5 ft. 1,350 ft. Adjacent right abutment Uncontrolled chute 135 ft. 250 ft. 127,000 c.f.s. Right abutment Controlled 1 3 5 by 10 ft. 8,120 c.f.s. $5,586,978 1,516,022 $7,103,000 Blanchard, Pa. 207 miles 339 sq. mi. 658 ft. 99,000 acre-ft. 3,650 acres 9.7 miles 370 acres Railroad, highway, cemetery, utilities Earthfill 683.0 ft. 100 ft. 5.3 ft. 6,835 ft. Adjacent saddle Uncontrolled overflow 74.0 ft. 600 ft. 203,000 c.f.s. Left abutment Controlled 1 3 5.5 by 12 ft. 9,500 c.f.s. 104 ft. $18,723,446 12,163,617 $30,887,063 4-39 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS TABLE 4-M (See Section 43 of Text) Cost To September 30, 1981 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Almond Village, N.Y.1 ,2 Anacostia River and tributaries, Flood Protection and Navigation Improvements, D.C. and Md.4 Anacostia River and tributaries, Prince Georges Co., Md.' Bainbridge, N.Y.6 ,7 Bath, N.Y.2,4 Bayard, W. Va."'7 Bridgewater, Va.' 7 Conklin-Kirkwood, N.Y. 4 7 Copes Corner Lake, N.Y.' ,9 Cortland, N.Y.4', o Davenport Center Lake, N.Y.2,9 Elkland, Pa.' Endicott Johnson City and Vestal, N.Y.' Fall Brook Lake, Pa. 9,1 Forest Heights, Md.' 7 Genegantslet Lake, N.Y. 9 Greene, N.Y.''7 Harpers Ferry, W. Va."1 Kingston-Edwardsville, Pa." Kitzmiller, Md.' 7 Lock Haven, Pa.' 7 Moorefield, W. Va.19 Nichols, N.Y.' Norwich, N.Y."' 7 Painted Post, N.Y.2"' Plymouth, Pa.' Savage River Dam, Md.4 Scranton, Pa.4,12 Sixes Bridge Lake, Md. & Pa.22 South Plymouth Lake, N.Y.9 Sunbury, Pa.' Swoyersville and Forty Fort, Pa.' Tyrone, Pa.2" Unadilla, N.Y.' Upper Marlboro, Md.'' Verona Lake, Va.22 Washington, D.C. and vicinity West Oneonta Lake, N.Y. 2,9 Wilkes-Barre, Hanover Township, Pa.' Williamsport, Pa.4 1970 1980 1977 1959 1970 1965 1953 1955 1970 1970 1970 1971 1979 1970 1964 1954 1951 1937 1979 1965 1980 1941 1974 1950 1970 1958 1954 1971 1974 1953 1953 1968 1980 1970 1965 1978 1953 1970 1958 1979 $ 24,6223 6,042,325 1,000,0006 382,000 638,332 55,2188 136,500 71,000 160,7003 324,486 286,4003 1,297,850 7,034,53411 46,100' 430,00013 214,5783 37,000 - 4,731,39415 501,50016 450,00018 7,928' 1,487,800 94,500 414,181 1,911,68920 2,271,93921 2,006,800 - 100,036' 6,063,00023 2,728,113 6,401,016 1,000,00025 590,013 992,000 331,92726 189,1003 3,853,45727 12,964,89328 1,407,010 33,999 1. Local cooperation withdrawn, project authorization expired May 26, 1953. 2. Unit of Southern New York Flood Control Projects. 3. Cost for preliminary work only. 4. Completed. 5. Local interests will not accept operation and maintenance responsibility of the project until the severe erosion and sedimentation of the project caused by tropical storm Eloise is corrected and the project is restored to design condition. 6. Excludes $357,022 contributed funds. 7. Authorized by Chief of Engineers. 8. Excludes $182,672 Public Works Acceleration funds and $4,290 contributed funds. 9. Deauthorized May 6, 1981. 10. Unit of Susquehanna River Flood Control Projects. 11. Excludes $154,694 contributed funds. 12. Unit of Lackawanna River Basin Projects. 13. Excludes $87,720 contributed funds. 14. Deauthorized August 5, 1977. 15. Includes $1,162,548 emergency relief funds and excludes $225,877 emergency relief funds expended prior to adoption of project. 16. Excludes $6,616 contributed funds. 17. Authorized for Phase I design memorandum stage of advanced engineering and design. 18. Excludes $481,000 for Phase I funded under General Investigations beginning October 1, 1978. 19. Deauthorized October 3, 1978. 20. Includes $4,357 emergency relief funds. 21. Includes $200,000 expended from contributed funds. 4-40 BALTIMORE, MD. DISTRICT 22. Authorized for the design memorandum stage of advanced engineering and design. 23. Excludes $140,504 contributed funds. 24. The unconstructed portion of the project was reclassified to the deferred category January 8, 1981. 25. Excludes $132,578 contributed funds. 26. Cost of previous project. Includes $106,500 emergency relief funds. 27. Includes $872,715 emergency relief funds. Excludes $36,375 emergency relief funds expended for new work before adoption of project. 28. Includes $1,887 emergency relief funds and excludes $110,835 contributed funds. EMERGENCY FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIESREPAIRS, FLOOD FIGHTING, AND RESCUE WORK (PUBLIC LAW 99, 84th CONG., AND ANTECEDENT LEGISLATION) TABLE 4-N (See Section 44 of Text) Project Federal Cost Disaster Preparedness Program $ 119,524.99 Advance Measures Forty-Fort, Pa. 1,880,972.55 Total $2,000,497.54 WASHINGTON AQUEDUCT MAINTENANCE, OPERATION, AND CAPITAL OUTLAY COST AND FINANCIAL SUMMARY AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1981 TABLE 4-0 (See Section 46 of Text) Water Supply Costs: Total accrued expenditure costed for the period was $14,732,423 distributed as follows: Operating Expenses $ 10,349,496 Deferred 778,994 Total Operating Expenses $11,128,490 Total Capital Outlay 3,603,933 Total Cost for Fiscal Year 1981 $14,732,423 Operating expenses, cost per million gallons $ 145.91 Financial Summary: Net Appropriations $312,429,018 Less Unexpended Balance 18,784,692 Total Costs $293,644,326 4-41 NORFOLK, VA., DISTRICT* This District comprises the State of Virginia, except the Potomac, Roanoke and Ohio River Basins; the entire area on the eastern shore of Virginia except for the project for Pocomoke River, Maryland and Virginia. On the west shore of Chesapeake Bay, all waterways south of Smith Point, Virginia, at the mouth of the Potomac River except the project for Little Wicomico River, Virginia. North Carolina, only the Chowan River Basin downstream to and including the mouth of the Meherrin River, and the Dismal Swamp Canal Route of the Atlantic Intracostal Waterway to the Albemarle Sound. West Virginia, only the James River Basin. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Between Norfolk Va., and St. Johns River ............... 5-2 2. Baltimore Harbor and Channels (Norfolk District) .............. 5-2 3. Cape Charles City Harbor, Va........... 5-3 4. Chincoteague Inlet, Va. .............. 5-4 5. Hampton Creek, Va.....................5-4 6. Hampton Roads and Harbors of Norfolk and Newport News, Va. Collection and Removal of Drift ......................... 5-4 7. James River, Va........................5-5 8. Lafayette River, Va ...................... 5-6 9. Norfolk Harbor, Va...................... 5-6 10. Nottoway River, Va ...................... 5-8 11. Starlings Creek, Va ...................... 5-8 12. Supervision of the Harbor of Hampton Roads (Prevention of Obstructive and Injurious Deposits) ... .................... 5-8 13. Tangier Channel, Va. .................... 5-9 14. Thimble Shoal Channel, Va............... 5-9 15. Tylers Beach, Va. ...................... 5-10 16. Waterway on the Coast of Virginia .............................. 5-10 17. Winter Harbor, Va ...................... 5-10 18. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys ....................... 5-11 Navigation (Cont'd) Page 19. Other Authorized Navigation Projects ................... .5-11 20. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization .................. 5-11 Beach Erosion Control 21. Virginia Beach, Va. .................... 5-11 22. Beach Erosion Control Work Under Special Authorization ............ 5-12 23. Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control .................... 5-12 Flood Control 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. Gathright Dam and Lake Moomaw, Va. ........................... 5-12 Richmond Filtration Plant, Va...........5-13 Richmond, Va........................... 5-13 Virginia Beach Streams Canal Number 2, Va .......................... 5-14 Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ......................... 5-15 Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization .. .............. 5-15 General Investigations Surveys ................................. 5-15 Collection and Study of Basic Data ........................... 5-15 * All cost and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referred in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 5-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 1. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA., AND ST. JOHNS RIVER, FLA. (NORFOLK DISTRICT) Location. Two inland water routes approximately paralleling Atlantic coast south of Norfolk, Va., between a point in Southern Branch of Elizabeth River, Va., 2,500 feet upstream of Norfolk & Western Railway bridge and Virginia- North Carolina State line in North Landing River, a distance of 27.2 miles; and 64.6 miles between mouth of Deep Creek, Va., and mouth of Pasquotank River, N.C. These routes are shown on Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 12206. Previous projects. For details, see page 476 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. A channel 12 feet deep at mean low water and 90 to 250 feet wide following Southern Branch of Elizabeth River, 5.2 miles, Virginia Land Cut, 8.3 miles, and North Landing River, 13.7 miles; and construction of a tidal guard lock at Great Bridge, Va. It also provides channels 10 feet deep at mean low water and 80 to 100 feet wide in Deep Creek, 3.1 miles, Turners Cut, 4.3 miles, and Pasquotank River, 35.1 miles; maintaining Dismal Swamp Canal, 22.1 miles, to about 9 feet deep mean canal level over a width of 50 feet; protection of banks in Turners Cut with sheet piling, and cutting certain sharp points in Pasquotank River to shorten its course. (See Table 5-C at end of chapter on Data Relative to Completed Locks included in Project.) Project includes operating and care of completed locks, dams and bridges, under maintenance. Southern Branch of Elizabeth River and Deep Creek sections of the two routes are tidal, mean range being about 3 feet with extremes of minus 3.5 and plus 9.6 feet. Remaining sections are nontidal with fluctuations of 1 to 2 feet in level due to winds. Cost for new work for completed project was $3,396,276. Protection to canal property at Great Bridge portion is considered inactive and excluded from foregoing cost. Estimated cost of this portion (1954) is $265,000. (See Table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities are considered adequate. See Annual Report for 1970. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and ordinary maintenance of the project consisting of real estate management services, condition and operation studies, operation and care of locks, bridges, spillways, wharves, canal plants, grounds, roads, buildings, etc. with Government plant and hired labor were carried on at a cost of $994,912. Permanent operating equipment used on both routes was purchased at a direct cost of $16,106. Repair and surfacing of North Landing and Great Bridge Bridge was accomplished by contract at a cost of $91,999. Maintenance repairs to bridges, dolphins, lockgates and bulkheads on both routes with government plant and hired labor were accomplished at a direct cost of $90,811. Repair of operating machinery at Great Bridge guard lock was performed by contract at a cost of $292,366. Maintenance engineering and design and supervision and administration costs, less credits for collections for quarters and damages to government property amounted to $523,336. Quantity surveys were performed at a cost of $30,570. Maintenance dredging by contract of the Lower Northlanding River was accomplished from 11 April to 31 July 1981. There were 271,260 cubic yards of credited material removed at a direct cost of $402,974. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete. For construction details, see Annual Report for 1966. Annual maintenance dredging is being done to provide full project dimensions on the Albemarle and Chesapeake Canal Routes and about a 7-foot usable depth on the Dismal Swamp Canal Route, which is considered adequate for existing traffic. 2. BALTIMORE HARBOR AND CHANNELS (NORFOLK DISTRICT) Existing, project. Provides for deep water approach channels in Baltimore Harbor. Northern portion including Baltimore Harbor is under jurisdiction of Baltimore District. Portion under jurisdiction of Norfolk District is more fully described below. 2A. CAPE HENRY CHANNEL, VA. Location. At mouth of Chesapeake bay opposite Cape Henry. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 12222). Existing project. A channel about 2.3 miles long, 1,000 feet wide, and 50 feet deep at mean low water through shoal at mouth of Chesapeake Bay opposite Cape Henry. Under ordinary conditions mean range of tide 2.5 feet and extreme 3 feet. Extremes of irregular fluctuation due to combined effect of wind and tides, referred to mean low water, are minus 2 feet and plus 9.5 feet. (See Table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation.) 2B. RAPPAHANNOCK SHOAL CHANNEL, VA. Location. In lower Chesapeake Bay opposite mouth of Rappahannock River and about 50 5-2 NORFOLK, VA., DISTRICT miles northerly from Atlantic Ocean at entrance of Chesapeake Bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 12225). Existing project. A channel about 9.9 miles long, 1,000 feet wide, and 50 feet deep at mean low water between contours of that depth in Chesapeake Bay, opposite Rappahannock River. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is 2.5 feet and extreme 3 feet. Extremes of irregular fluctuation due to combined effect of wind and tides, referred to mean low water, are minus 2 feet and plus 9.5 feet. (See Table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation.) 2C. YORK SPIT CHANNEL, VA. Location. In lower Chesapeake Bay opposite mouth of York River and about 20 miles northerly from Atlantic Ocean at entrance of Chesapeake Bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 12221). Previous project. For details, see Annual Report for 1932. Existing project. A channel about 18.2 miles long, 1,000 feet wide, and 50 feet deep at mean low water between contours of that depth in Chesapeake Bay opposite York Spit. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is 2.5 feet and extreme 3 feet. Extremes of irregular fluctuation, due to combined effect of wind and tides, referred to mean low water, are minus 2 feet and plus 9.5 feet. (See Table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation). Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. These three channels form the access between lower and upper Chesapeake Bay. Operations and results during fiscal year. Two condition surveys were performed: Cape Henry Channel, October 1980 and York Spit Channel, January 1981, at a cost of $9,933. Operation and ordinary maintenance of the project was accomplished at a cost of $1,910. Maintenance engineering and design and supervision and administration amounted to $3,334. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was completed in June 1939. Periodic maintenance dredging is being performed to maintain full project dimensions. 3. CAPE CHARLES CITY HARBOR, VA. Location. Town of Cape Charles, Va., is on Chesapeake Bay on west side of peninsula separating the bay from Atlantic Ocean. It is about 11 miles north of southern extremity of peninsula and 45 miles south of Maryland-Virginia State line. Cape Charles City Harbor is an artificial land-locked harbor on south side of the town. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1222.) Existing project. A channel 18 feet deep and 500 feet wide from that depth in Chesapeake Bay through Cherrystone Bar and inlet to the entrance to Cape Charles City Harbor, a distance of 2.71 miles, thence a basin in the harbor of the same depth 400 to 800 feet wide and 3,000 feet long, thence a channel 10 feet deep, 100 to 180 feet wide and 260 feet long connecting a basin of same depth 180 feet wide and 420 feet long at head of Mud Creek, and a harbor of refuge on the north side of Mud Creek, 7 feet deep, 200 to 250 feet wide, and 375 feet long connected to Mud Creek with an entrance channel 7 feet deep and 60 feet wide. Project also provides for protective works in form of a stone jetty on north side of harbor entrance and sand mole 1,350 feet long south of harbor entrance. All depths are referred to mean low water. Mean tidal range is 2.3 feet with extremes of 2.5 feet below and 8 feet above mean low water. Cost for new work for completed project was $628,644, including $6,000 from contributed fund. Widening the basin an additional 200 feet is considered inactive and excluded from foregoing cost. Estimated cost of this portion (1954) is $207,000. Local cooperation. Conditions imposed by River and Harbor Act of 1938 were fully complied with and approved by Chief of Engineers on March 30, 1940. River and Harbor Act of 1945, in adopting existing project .dimensions, imposed conditions that local interests provide all lands for initial construction and future maintenance; provide and maintain substantial bulkheads and other terminal facilities adequate to permit full utilization of improvement; and reserve at least 1,000 linear feet of berthing space along such bulkheads for general public use on equal and reasonable terms; and agree to hold the United States free from damages. Local interests furnished all lands necessary for dredging harbor to 800-foot width. Items of local cooperation in connection with Harbor of refuge have been complied with. Terminal facilities. The Pennsylvania Railroad owns a wooden pier 200 feet long and two transfer ships in the outer harbor. On the south side of the harbor, Bay Shore concrete owns an 800-foot bulkhead. A bulkhead providing 200 feet of berthing space is on the south side of the main harbor and is owned by a fish plant. There are about 1400 feet of city-owned bulkhead open to the public. The Coast Guard owns a 100-foot pier on Mud Creek. The harbor of refuge, should accomodate about 50 boats when berthing facilities are completed. Operation and results during fiscal year. Maintenance dredging was performed by contract in the entrance channel from 17 January to 17 February 1981. There were 56,670 cubic yards 5-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 of material hauled at a cost of $87,043. Supervision and administration and quantity surveys amounted to $5,007, other condition survey work amounted to $20,578. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of entrance channel and main harbor began in August 1942 and was completed in January 1943. Periodic maintenance dredging is being performed to maintain full project dimensions. 4. CHINCOTEAGUE INLET, VA. Location. Chincoteague Inlet at the southern end of Assateague Island provides access to the Atlantic Ocean from the inland waterway near the town of Chincoteague, Virginia. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 12211). Previous projects. None. Existing project. Provides for a channel 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide across the ocean bar in the Atlantic Ocean and to the mouth of the inlet; thence, a channel 9 feet deep and 100 feet wide from the inlet through the canal and then along Chincoteague Channel to a point approximately 2.000 feet north of the state highway bridge to Chincotegue, a distance of about 6.6 miles. Mean range of tide is about 3 feet. All depths are referred to mean low water. (See Table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. For details see Annual Report for 1974. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities at Chincoteague are considered adequate for current and prospective traffic. Operations and results during fiscal year. Condition surveys were performed at a direct cost of $32,913. Maintenance dredging by the hopper dredge Currituck was accomplished between 29 January and 18 March, 1981. There were 31,752 cubic yards of credited material removed at a direct cost of $85,581. Maintenance dredging was also accomplished by the sidecaster dredge Fry between 10 February to 23 April and 18 June to 21 September 1981. There were 92,074 cubic yards of credited material removed at a direct cost of $605,682. Maintenance engineering and design and supervision and adminstration including quantity surveys amounted to $128,979. Condition at end of fiscal year. New work dredging of project was completed during fiscal year 1974. Annual maintenance dredging at the outer bar will be accomplished. 5. HAMPTON CREEK, VA. Location. A tidal estuary of Hampton Roads within the city of Hampton, Va. It is about 3 miles long, flows southerly and empties into Hampton Roads about 1.5 miles west of Fort Monroe. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey charts 400 and 1222.) Previous projects. For details, see Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Provides for a channel 12 feet deep from vicinity of Old Point Comfort across Hampton Flats and up the creek to Hampton Highway Bridge at Queen Street about 2.8 miles, with a width of 200 feet in outer portion of channel and 150 feet in the creek, suitably widened at the bends; a channel in Herberts Creek 180 feet wide and 12 feet deep, extending from the channel in Hampton Creek upstream to Kecoughtan Road about 0.6 mile. Under ordinary conditions, the mean tidal range is 2.6 feet (See Table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. The conditions imposed by the River and Harbor Acts of August 30, 1935, and March 2, 1945, pertaining to the intitial construction, have been fully complied with. The River and Harbor Act of October 27, 1965 deleted requirement for providing spoil disposal areas for maintenance. Local interests have contributed toward disposal costs for material deposited in Craney Island Disposal Area. Terminal facilities. Terminal facilities are adequate for existing commerce. (For details see page 319 of Annual Report for 1967.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance dredging by contract was accomplished from 10 October to 23 November 1980. There were 111,060 cubic yards of credited material removed at a direct cost of $342,069. The rehandling basin toll collections for deposit of dredged material into Craney Island amounted to $142,026. Maintenance engineering and design and supervision and administration costs amounted to $25,143. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete. For details of construction, see page 320 of Annual Report for 1967. Periodic maintenance will continue to be accomplished. 6. HAMPTON ROADS AND HARBORS OF NORFOLK AND NEWPORT NEWS, VA. - COLLECTION AND REMOVAL OF DRIFT Location. Hampton Roads is a natural harbor 300 miles south of New York and 180 miles south of Washington, D.C. Its principal tributaries are James River, affording a natural deep harbor at Newport News, Virginia; Elizabeth River, with its Southern, Eastern, and Western Branches providing harbors for Norfolk and Portsmouth, Virginia; and Hampton Creek, serving the harbor at Hampton, Virginia. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts No. 12248, 12245, and 12253.) 5-4 NORFOLK, VA., DISTRICT Existing project. Collection and removal of drift in Hampton Roads and its tributary waters authorizes the Secretary of the Army to allot necessary amounts of work from appropriations for maintenance and improvement of existing river and harbor works or from other available appropriations and that this work shall be carried on as a seperate and distinct project. It is wholly a work of maintenance. The purpose of work is to afford relief from variable conditions of obstruction. No advance estimate of the amount of work is required. (See Table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation). Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. See Norfolk Harbor, Virginia and Channel to Newport News, Virginia. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation of the project incinerator amounted to $16,263. Maintenance operations, amounting to $112,171, consisted of collection and disposal of an estimated 63,200 cubic feet of a variety of floating refuse, ranging from discarded furniture to heavy timber and piling. Maintenance engineering and design and supervision and administration costs amounted to $20,297. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project is one of continuous operation and maintenance for which no ,percentage of completion exists. Operations under existing project began in July 1950. Cost for removal of drift before then was carried under Norfolk, Harbor, Virginia. The incinerator constructed at Craney Island Disposal area began operation in Fiscal Year 1974. 7. JAMES RIVER, VA. Location. The river is formed by junction. of the Cowpasture and Jackson Rivers in Botetourt County, Virginia, flows easterly 340 miles, and empties into Hampton Roads at Newport News, Virginia. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts No. 12248 and 12251.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. A channel 35 feet deep and 300 feet wide from the mouth to Richmond Deepwater Terminal, and thence a channel 18 feet deep and 200 feet wide from the deepwater terminal to Richmond Lock; a mooring basin 35 feet deep, 180 to 220 feet wide and 2,100 feet long, along side the channel opposite waterfront at Hopewell; enlargement of the turning basin at Richmond Deepwater Terminal to 825 feet wide, 2,770 feet long and 35 feet deep; a turning basin in Richmond Harbor 200 feet wide, 600 feet long and 18 feet deep; and construction of spur and turning dikes. Depth of channels are referred to mean low water. Total length of channel included in the project is 87 miles, which is the navigable section. Mean tidal ranges under ordinary conditions for different parts of the river are: mouth, 2.6 feet; Jamestown, 2 feet; City Point, 2.6 feet; and Richmond, 3.2 feet. Spring tide ranges under ordinary conditions at the same localities are mouth, 3.1 feet; Jamestown 2.4 feet; City Point, 3 feet; Richmond, 3.2 feet. Ordinary fluctuations of stage at Richmond, due to floods, are 6 to 12 feet above mean low water. Extreme fluctuations are 16 to 32 feet. Flood heights below Richmond diminish rapidly. The extreme according to available information is about 11 feet lower at Dutch gap, 14 miles below and 17 to 18 feet lower, 20 miles below. Estimated (1971) total cost for new work is $71,145,940 including required non-Federal cost-for conditions of local cooperation imposed by the River and Harbor Acts of 1930, 1945, and 1950, estimated (1939) to be $1,949,700; and by the River and Harbor Act of 1962, estimated (1971) to be $2,950,000. (See Table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation). Local cooperation. Fully complied with for conditions imposed by River and Harbor Acts of 1930, 1945, and 1950. The conditions imposed by the River and Harbor Act of 1962 have not been complied with. Terminal facilities. Rivers commerce at Richmond is handled by city-owned terminals, city wharf, Richmond dock, and 16 privatelyowned wharves within or in the immediate vicinity of Richmond Harbor. The city's Upper Terminal, located on the north bank within the manufacturing section of Richmond, provides for 750 feet of concrete wharf and 80,000 square feet of warehouse and transit shed. The other terminal is located approximately 4 miles downstream from the Upper Terminal which provides about 1,250 feet of wharf and 2 concrete warehouses with about 190,000 square feet of floor space. This deepwater terminal at the head of the 25-foot deep improved channel serves ocean-going vessels and larger ships engaged in coastwide trading. Below the deepwater terminals the improvement is served by 42 wharves. Richmond terminals and wharves together with wharves between Richmond and the river's mouth are adequate for river's commerce. Operation and results during fiscal year. Operation of the project including condition surveys and special studies and reports amounted to $227,678. Maintenance dredging by contract of 529,841 cubic yards of credited material from Richmond Harbor, the Deepwater Terminal and the Deepwater Terminal to Hopewell was accomplished from 9 October 1980 5-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 to 24 January 1981 at a direct cost of $1,310,571. Miscellaneous cost relating to the kepone test dredging program amounted to $63,981. Maintenance engineering and design and supervision and administration including quantity surveys amounted to $293,298. Condition at end of fiscal year. A test dredging contract, in the amount of $510,000, for the removal or kepone laden sediment was awarded at the end of fiscal year 1981 with work to be completed in fiscal year 1982. Construction of existing project commenced in 1884 and continued intermittenly through various modifications until 25-foot and 18-foot channels were completed in November 1947. (See Annual Report for 1965 for details on completion date.) Annual maintenance dredging to maintain 18 and 25 foot controlling depths on the project has not been accomplished since 1975 due to contamination of the river by pesticide Kepone. Work remaining to complete the project consists of deepening the channel from 25 to 35 feet deep from the mouth of the Richmond Deepwater Terminal and widening to 300 feet between Hopewell and Deepwater Terminal. Also remaining are construction of a mooring basin at Hopewell and enlargement of a turning basin at Richmond Deepwater Terminal. Uncompleted portions of the project are considered inactive. 8. LAFAYETTE RIVER, VA.. Location. This river is a tidal estuary of Hampton Roads, formed by two branches lying wholly in the city of Norfolk, Va. The two branches, each about 2 miles long, flow from the northeast and southeast and join at a point about 3.5 miles above the mouth. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 12245.) Previous projects. For details, see Annual Report for 1969. Existing project. A channel 8 feet deep and 100 feet wide from deep water in Hampton Roads to the Hampton Boulevard bridge, thence 6 feet deep, 50 feet wide, and 100 feet long, a total length of approximately 4.0 miles. East Haven is located at the upstream limits of the Lafayette River project, immediately downstream of the Granby Street Bridge, and provides for a channel 50 feet wide and 6 feet deep from that depth in the Lafayette River to the upstream end of the creek, a distance of approximately 2,500 feet. All depths referred to mean low water. (See Table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. For details, see Annual Report for fiscal year 1979. Terminal facilities. See Annual Report for fiscal year 1979. Operations and results during fiscal year. Contract dredging of the East Haven modification was accomplished during the period 22 October 1980 to 15 January 1981. There were 23,355 cubic yards of credited material removed at a direct cost of $52,312. Rehandling basin toll charges amounted to $34,491. Supervision and administration including quantity surveys amounted to $19,402. Condition surveys on other portions of the project amounted to $16,365. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project complete, with maintenance dredging being performed on a periodic basis. 9. NORFOLK HARBOR, VA. Location. Norfolk, Virginia is 187 miles south of Baltimore, Maryland and 30 miles from entrance to Chesapeake Bay at Cape Charles and Cape Henry. Harbor extends 18.3 miles from 45-foot contour at Hampton Roads to a point 2,500 feet above Norfolk and Western Railway Bridge over Southern Branch of the Elizabeth River. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 12245 and 12253.) Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. A main channel 45 feet deep, 1,500 feet wide, from that depth in Hampton Roads near Fort Wool to a point just south of Norfolk International Terminal Piers; thence, at same depth 800 feet wide to Lamberts Point; thence, 40 feet deep and 750 feet wide to mouth of Southern Branch of Elizabeth River; and 450 feet wide up this branch to the Belt Line Railroad bridge, including an approach in turning area to same depth and a maximum width of 830 feet opposite Norfolk Naval Shipyard, extending downstream 3,250 feet from Belt Line Railroad bridge; thence; 40 feet wide, 375 feet wide and 1 mile long to Norfolk and Western (formerly Virginia Railway bridge); thence; 35 feet deep, 250 feet wide and 3.1 miles long to a point 1,900 feet above Norfolk and Western Railway (Gilmerton's Bridge); thence, 35 feet deep, 250 feet to 500 feet wide to a point 1.6 miles above Interstate 64 high level bridge. A turning basin at the mouth of St. Julian's Creek, 35 feet deep and 400-600 feet square, and a turning basin at the mouth of Main's Creek 35 feet deep and 600 feet square, the upstream end of the project. A channel in Eastern Branch, 25 feet deep, 500 feet wide and 1.09 miles long from 40- foot channel to Norfolk and Western Railway bridge; thence, 25 feet deep, 300 feet wide 0.55 mile long to Campostella Bridge; thence, 25 feet deep, 200 feet wide and 1.2 mile to Norfolk and Western Railway bridge (formerly Virginia Railway bridge); and for maintenance at a depth of 25 feet of existing turning basin and 5.5 acres in extent at head of existing project just below the Norfolk and Western (formerly Virginian) Railway bridge). A channel in Western Branch, 40 foot 5-6 NORFOLK, VA., DISTRICT channel in Elizabeth River, 24 feet deep, 300 feet wide and 0.78 mile long; thence, 24 feet deep and 200 feet wide for 0.37 mile to West Norfolk Highway bridge; thence, 18 feet deep. 150 wide, 0.57 mile long. A channel in Scotts Creek between 40-foot channel at mouth and a point 100 feet above former location of Atlantic Coast Line Railroad bridge (about 0.73 miles upstream), 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide. Anchorage areas on west side of 40 foot channel opposite Lamberts Point and south of Craney Island aggregating 173 acres, consisting of 1 anchorage space 1,500 feet square and 38 feet deep; 1 anchorage space 1,500 feet square and 35 feet deep; and 1 anchorage 1,000 feet wide, 3,000 feet long and 20 feet deep. Another anchorage of 45 acres and 12 feet deep near Pinner Point. Two anchorages opposite Sewells Point 45 feet deep over a swinging radius of 1,200 feet and a trapezoidal shaped disposal area of about 2,500 acres of flats adjacent to the north of Craney Island, inclosed by stonefaced levees, 3 sluiceways in west levee, and an access road. Facilities for unloading of hopper dredged material consisting of mooring dolphins; a mooring barge anchorage 100 by 600 feet, 21 feet deep, with approach channel 300 to 3,600 feet; 30- foot deep connecting anchorage with Norfolk Harbor 45 foot channel; and a 28-inch discharge pipe line to the leveed area. Facilities for contract rehandling of bucket dredged material consisting of a rehandling basin 1,000 by 1,200 feet, 40 feet deep, protected by a spur levee extending 2,350 feet from main levee and provided with approach exit channels, 200 feet wide by 18 feet deep to Norfolk Harbor 45 foot channel and a pipe line trestle from rehandling basin to leveed area. All depths are referred to mean low water. Mean tidal range is 2.7 feet, and extreme is 3.4 feet. Extremes of irregular fluctuations, due to combined effect of tides and winds referred to mean low water on -3.5 feet and +9.6 feet. Eastern Branch, 30-foot channel portion is considered inactive. (See Table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Latest published description of terminal facilities is in Port Series No. 11 (revised 1971, part II) on Ports of Hampton Roads, prepared by Board of Engineers-for Rivers and Harbors. Operations and results during fiscal year. Engineering and design and supervision and administration amounted to $30,152 of construction funds for ocean disposal studies for the Norfolk Harbor project. Operation of the Craney Island portion of the project including condition and operation studies, office studies and reports, care of buildings, grounds, utilities, roads, levees, plant and hopper dredge pipeline and supervision and administration amounted to $477,978. Permanent operating equipment for use at Craney Island amounted to $39,806. Operation of the Norfolk Harbor portion of the project including condition surveys, care of buildings and grounds, commercial statistics. and budgeting and scheduling amounted to $674,767. A maintenance dredging contract in the amount of $2,977,244 for the 45-foot channel was awarded in August 1981 with work to begin in September. There were an estimated 70,000 cubic yards of credited material removed at a direct cost of $295,000. In addition to the 45-foot channel maintenance dredging, a continuing contract for maintenance dredging of the Southern branch 35-foot channel was also awarded August 1981 ,in the amount of $594,804, with work to begin in September. There were an estimated 150,000 cubic yards of credited material removed at a direct cost of $467,998. Toll charges for disposal of this material into the Craney Island rehandling facility amounted to $141,400. Maintenance dredging of Craney Island Rehandling Basin was completed betweeen the period 1-4 October 1980. There were removed 330,801 cubic yards of credited material financed by user tolls. Total contractor earnings on this FY1980 continuing contract amounted to $1,589,979. Maintenance engineering and design and real estate activities and supervision and administration amounted to $218,249. Condition surveys of the Sewells Point and Craney Island anchorage area was conducted in December 1980. Condition at end of fiscal year. For details on construction on portion of existing project completed prior to FY 66, see Annual Report for 1965. Since 1965 new work dredging of 45-foot channel from Fort Wool to Norfolk and Western Railway Company coal piers was completed in August 1967. New work dredging of turning basin in 35-foot channel opposite St. Julian's Creek was completed in July 1966. New work dredging of 40-foot channel between Norfolk and Portsmouth Belt Line Railroad bridge and Norfolk and Western Railway bridge was completed July 1968. New work dredging of the extension of the Southern Branch 35-foot channel was completed during the fiscal year 1980. Work remaining to complete the active portion of the project consists of deepening one of the deep draft anchorages to 45 feet. Annual maintenance dredging is being done to provide full project dimensions in the 45-, 40-and 35-foot main channels. 5-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 10. NOTTOWAY RIVER, VA. Location. The study section of the Nottoway River, a major tributary of the Chowan River, is located in Southampton County in southeastern Virginia. (See Courtland and Sebrell, Virginia quadrangles of geological survey.) Previous projects. None. Existing project. Channel width of 15 feet from the public boat ramp located 700 feet above Route 653 (Carey's Bridge) downstream to open water just below the Seaboard Coast Line Railway Bridge. Under normal river conditions, the water depths are adequate for the recreational craft using the river. Therefore, dredging is not a part of this project. (See Table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local coopeation. Fully complied with. For details, see Annual Report for fiscal year 1979. Operations and results during fiscal year. Final payment on the snagging and clearing contract completed in fiscal year 1980 was delayed until fiscal year 1981 due to low water level in the river, which had delayed final inspection and cleanup. Total costs amounted to $7,352. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete. Periodic snagging and clearing will be performed as needed. 11. STARLINGS CREEK, VA. Location. A small estuary tributary to Pocomoke Sound on eastern side of Chesapeake Bay, adjacent to the town of Saxis, Virginia, on Saxis Island in Accomack County. This Eastern Shore creek is approximately 70 miles north of Norfolk, Va., and 80 miles southeast of Washington, D.C. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 12228.) Existing project. A channel 7 feetdeep at mean low water and 60 feet wide from that depth in Pocomoke Sound to mouth of Starlings Creek, thence a turning basin of same depth, 100 feet wide and 1,100 feet long, and thence an approach channel 60 feet wide connecting the turning basin with a harbor of refuge, 7 feet deep, 200 feet wide, and 500 feet long. Mean range of tide is 2.4 feet. (See Table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for construction. For details, see page 315 of Annual Report for 1965. Local interests are to furnish spoil disposal areas as required for maintenance. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities are considered adequate. For details, see page 315 of Annual Report for 1965. Operation and results during fiscal year. Local interests were reimbursed for non Federal diking expenses. Total reimbursement was $25,705. Condition survey work amounted to $6,982. Condition at end of fiscal year. Entrance channel and turning basin were completed in 1937. Periodic maintenance dredging is being done to maintain full project dimensions. 12. SUPERVISION OF THE HARBOR OF HAMPTON ROADS (PREVENTION OF OBSTRUCTIVE AND INJURIOUS DEPOSITS) Laws enacted for the preservation of the Harbor of Hampton Roads, Virginia, its adjacent and tributary waters, and so much of the Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries as lies within the State of Virginia and so much of the Atlantic Ocean and its tributaries as lies within the jurisdiction of the United States, within or to the east of the State of Virginia, are administered by the Supervisor of the Harbor of Hampton Roads. Laws relating to the supervision of the Harbor of Hampton Roads and its tributary waters are the New York Harbor Act of 1888, as amended, the River and Harbor Act of 1899, the Clean Water Act, the Marine Protection, Research and Sanctuary Act of 1972, the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, the Fish and Wild-life Act of 1956, the Federal Power Act of 1920, the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, the Endangered Species Act of 1973, the Deepwater Port Act of 1974 and the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972, the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act, the Land and Water Conservation Fund Act. Direct supervision of the harbor was exercised by means of four patrol vessels (469 patrols, 3968 man-hours) involving debris removal, maintenance of buoys and fish stake limits, investigating reports of sunken vessels, navigational hazards and providing support for Federal dredging projects. Surveillance of the harbor, the Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries with respect to the regulatory permit program was conducted by means of three small outboards, 7-8 motor vehicles, and commercial aircraft for aerial surveys. The outboards were involved in 36 patrols (144 man-hours) involving primarily compliance surveys of permitted dredging projects. The motor vehicles were used to investigate 205 complaints of unauthorized activities. Commercial aircraft involved 42 flights (126 man-hours) of which ten were used to photograph confirmed violations. An educational program continued in an effort to inform the public of the need and requirements for Department of the Army permits. This program was effectual through press releases, public notices, public talks and personal interviews with interested agencies, committees and private industries. 5-8 NORFOLK, VA., DISTRICT Agreements and the monthly joint interagency meeting were continued with various Federal, State, and local agencies having related or similar responsibilities and functions to obtain maximum results with minimum costs by eliminating duplication of effort. The joint permit application and the joint public notice adopted between the Norfolk District and the State of Virginia have continued to result in decreases in the numerous forms of paperwork required to process a permit application. The Norfolk District's Regulatory Functions Branch continued to maintain the Northern Neck Project Office and the Eastern Shore Project Office in Accomac, Virginia. Each of these project offices provide readily available Corps personnel to assist waterfront owners, contractors, and the general public with their questions and problems on waterfront construction and the permit requirements of the Corps regulatory program. Summary of legal action during fiscal year. Disposition of legal action to end of fiscal year for violations of Federal Statutes is as follows: Eleven cases were referred for litigation, of which five were resolved through consent decrees and total payments of $12,250 in civil penalties. Of the remaining six cases, it appears that three will be resolved through restoration and/or payment of civil penalties. Of 147 confirmed violations investigated this fiscal year, sixty-three were resolved through voluntary restoration, thrity-four were resolved through after-the-fact permits and the remaining fifty are still pending. 13. TANGIER CHANNEL, VA. Location. A tidal channel about 2 miles long extending from Tangier Island, Virginia, northeasterly to deepwater in Tangier Sound, Chesapeake Bay and northwesterly to deep water on Chesapeake Bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Chart No. 12228.) Existing project. A channel 8 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide from 8-foot contour to Tangier Sound to day marker no. 4, and thence 8 feet deep and 60 feet wide to the town of Tangier, with an anchorage basin adjacent to town 400 feet square and 7 feet deep. A channel 7 feet deep and 60 feet wide for about 4,000 feet from the anchorage basin northwesterly across Tangier Island to Chesapeake Bay. Mean range of tide is 1.7 feet and extreme tidal range is 4.7 feet. (See Table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Complied with except that local interests must furnish spoil disposal area as needed for future maintenance. Terminal facilities. Accomack County constructed a public dock in 1961. There are four privately-owned docks adjacent to existing project and two marine railways. Operation and results during fiscal year. Condition surveys were performed at a direct cost of $9,212. Engineering and design to study dredging and disposal of material in Craney Island was conducted at a cost of $21,610. Other engineering and design including Benthic studies by the Virginia Institute of Marine Sciences amounted to $30,040. Condition at end of fiscal year. Channel from Tangier Sound to anchorage basin at Tangier was completed in 1948. Construction of channel across Tangier Island began in December 1965 and was completed in January 1966. Periodic maintenance dredging is being done to provide full project dimensions. 14. THIMBLE SHOAL CHANNEL Location. In lower portion of Chesapeake Bay between Hampton Roads and the ocean, 20 miles northeast of center of Norfolk Harbor, extending southeasterly 12 miles from a point 1.25 miles east of Thimble Shoal Lighthouse toward entrance to Chesapeake Bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1222.) Previous projects. For details, see page 470 of Annual Report for 1932. Existing project. Provides for dredging a channel 12 miles long, 1,000 feet wide, and 45 feet deep at mean low water with auxiliary channels 450 feet wide and 32 feet deep at mean low water adjoining each side of 1,000-foot channel. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is 2.5 feet and extreme 3 feet. Extremes of irregular fluctuation, due to combined wind and tides, referred to mean low water, are minus 3 feet and plus 7 feet. (See Table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Project serves as an entrance channel to Hampton Roads. See "Norfolk, Harbor, Va.," "Channel to Newport News, Va.," etc. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance engineering and design and supervision and administration including quantity surveys amounted to $110,346. A maintenance dredging contract, in the amount of $3,714,920, was awarded in September and was in progress at the end of the fiscal year. There were an estimated 16,000 cubic yards of credited material removed from 29-30 September 1981 at a direct cost of $202,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. The maintenance dredging contract awarded in September 5-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 1981 is scheduled for completion during the first quarter of fiscal year 1982. Existing project is complete, except for auxiliary channels which are in an inactive status. New work dredging of channel 750 feet wide and 40 feet deep was commenced in December 1917 and completed June 1929. Widening this channel to 1,000 feet at same depth was commenced in February and completed in April 1957. Deepening this channel to 45 feet commenced December 1965 and was completed in May 1970. Periodic maintenance dredging is being done to maintain a 45-foot depth in the 1,000-foot wide main channel. 15. TYLERS BEACH, VA. Location. On south shore of James River in Isle of Wight County in a deep indentation known as Burwells Bay about 13 miles above the mouth of the James River. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 12248.) Existing project. Provides for harbor of refuge 6 feet deep, 150 feet wide and 300 feet long, just south of Tylers Beach, and a channel 6 feet deep, 50 feet wide and about 2,350 feet long from that depth in Burwells Bay to the harbor of refuge. Plane of reference is mean low water. The project was modified in 1981 to provide for construction of two 370-foot placed stone revetment/jetty structures along the banks of the inlet throat leading to the harbor. Mean range of tide is 2.4 feet. (See Table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. For details see Annual Report for 1967. Terminal facilities. A public landing has been constructed by a local interest under the requirements of local cooperation. Watermen basing operations at Tylers Beach have constructed mooring facilities in the harbor of refuge for their vessels. Existing facilities are considered adequate. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance dredging, by contract, was accomplished from 9-17 may 1981. There were 27,566 cubic yards of credited material removed at a direct cost of $170,309. Maintenance engineering and design and supervision and administration including quantity surveys amounted to $70,824, other condition survey work amounted to $3,682. Plans and specifications and other engineering and design and supervision and administration costs during the year amounted to $8,796. These costs are associated with the Section 107 modification for jetty construction. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the Section 107 modification awarded in September 1981 is scheduled for completion in fiscal year 1982. Construction of the existing portion of the project approved in 1966, commenced in June and was completed in July 1968. Periodic maintenance dredging will continue in order to provide full project dimensions. 16. WATERWAY ON THE COAST OF VIRGINIA Location. Between barrier beach along Atlantic Ocean on the east and Virginia portion of mainland peninsula on the west. It extends for 83.7 miles from south end of Chincoteague Bay through a number of creeks, thoroughfares, and bays, to enter Chesapeake Bay in the vicinity of Fisherman Island, just south of Cape Charles on the southern tip of the peninsula. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart Nos. 12211, 12210, and 12221.) Existing projects. An inland waterway 6 feet deep at mean low water and 60 feet wide from Chesapeake Bay to Chincoteague Bay, Virginia. Mean range of tide is about 3 feet. Greater fluctuations in water level are caused by high winds and storms. A modification of the project approved during 1970 under Section 201 of the Flood Control Act of 1965 authorizes relocation of portions of the waterway and widening to 100 feet. (See Table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Complied with except that local interests are to furnish spoil disposal areas for future maintenance. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities are considered adequate. For details see Annual Report for 1969. Operations and results during fiscal year. Condition surveys of 10 separate reaches of the project were performed from October 1980 to August 1981. Maintenance engineering and design and supervision and administration costs amounted to $372,394. Tide gauging work performed by hired labor and contract amounted to $80,260. Real estate activity costs amounted to $8,411. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was completed in 1959. Construction of 1970 modification is inactive. Annual maintenance dredging was to have been accomplished in fiscal year 1979. However, local interests would not comply with the Corps 1978 cost sharing policy for disposal area retaining dikes and the project was not maintained. Recent policy changes, however, in diking costs make it possible for dredging in FY 1982. Project is known to be critically shoaled at Magothy Bay, Gull Marsh Flats, North Channel and Metomkin Bay. 17. WINTER HARBOR, VA. Location. A tidal estuary in Mathews County, 5-10 NORFOLK, VA., DISTRICT Va. entering Chesapeake Bay on its western shore 42 miles north of Norfolk, Va., and 4.9 miles north of New Point Comfort. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart Nos. 12235 and 12238.) Existing project. A channel 12 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide extending about 7,600 feet from that depth in Chesapeake Bay to vicinity of public landing, and a mooring and turning basin of the same depth and 400 feet square, with flared approach, at inner end of channel. Mean range of lunar tide is 2 feet with estimated variations, induced by storms, from 2 feet below to 8.5 feet above mean low water. (See Table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for construction. Local interests are to furnish spoil disposal areas as required for maintenance. Terminal facilities. Three privately owned wooden wharves on Winter Harbor and its branches which handle bulk of commerce on the project and are open to all equally. There are also 22 small private wooden foot wharves and numerous shore landings. In addition there is a public bulkhead and landing which is open to all on equal terms. Operations and results during fiscal year. Local interests were reimbursed for non-Federal diking expenses. Total reimbursement was $15,000. Condition survey work amounted to $5,440. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was completed in July 1956. Periodic maintenance dredging is being done to provide full project dimensions. 18. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS (See Table 5-E at end of chapter.) 19. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Table 5-F at end of chapter.) 20. NAVAGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Three reconnaissance reports: Back Creek, York County, VA, Pungoteague Creek, Accomack County, VA and Drum Point Creek, Chesapeake, VA were completed during the year. One detailed project report: Tylers beach, VA was completed during the year. Three detailed project reports: Bushy Park Creek, Middlesex County, VA; Chincoteague Inlet, VA; and Long Creek, Lynnhaven Inlet, VA were in progress at the end of the year. Beach Erosion Control 21. VIRGINIA BEACH, VA. Location. On the Atlantic Seaboard, 22 miles north of Virginia-North Carolina State line, 3.5 miles south of Cape Henry, and 19 miles east of Norfolk, Va. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 12207.) Existing project. Federal participation in restoration and protection of shore of Virginia Beach between Rudee Inlet and 49th Street by artificial placement of sand to provide a minimum beach width of 100 feet at elevation 7 feet above mean low water, and maintenance of such beach by periodic replenishment of losses to insure continuous protection; including construction of a groin system to be undertaken at such times as estimated annual charges therewith would be less than the annual cost of beach replenishment alone. The United States shall participate in the first cost of the project to the full extent of its proportionate share of cost as a landowner, plus one third total first cost of restoring and protecting all publicly-owned sections of the shore. The 1962 modification provided that the United States shall further participate in periodic beach nourishment of the beach in the amount of one third the cost for 25 years from date of commencement of operations in placing an initial quantity of nourishment material equal to deficiency in the design beach at that time. Section 103 of the 1962 River and Harbor Act increased Federal participation to one-half of the cost incurred after October 23, 1962. Estimated Federal cost (1980) is $5,750,000. Estimated cost to local interests is $5,750,000. Construction of the groin system is not included in the above estimate. The 1962 estimate for this work was $549,000 Federal cost and $531,000 cost to local interests. The 1974 modification provides for structural and non-structural improvements. Structural measures would be provided for the 6 mile reach of shoreline between Rudee Inlet and 89th Street. This would include raising the beach to elevation 10 feet and a width of 100 feet, driving a sheet pile wall just seaward of the existing bulkhead from Rudee Inlet to 57th Street; and raising and strengthening sand dunes from 57th to 89th Streets. The estimated cost (1980) of the structural improvements are Federal $28,700,000 and non-Federal $15,000,000. (See Table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation.River and Harbor Act of September 3, 1954, imposed conditions that local interests (a) adopt plan of restoration and protection; (b) submit for approval by the Chief of Engineers, before commencement of work detailed plans and specifications for the project and also arrangements for prosecuting the work; 5-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 (c) assure maintenance of protective and improvement measurements during their useful life as may be required to serve their intended purpose; (d) provide all lands and rights-of-way; hold the United States free from damage; (e) assure that water pollution that would endanger the health of bathers will not be permitted; and (f) assure continued public ownership of the shore upon which the amount of Federal participation is based, and its administration for public use only. The modification of the project by the River and Harbor Act of October 23, 1962, continued the terms of local cooperation specified in the original project. The conditions of local cooperation have been combined within the initial beach restoration and in the nourishment program to date. Conditions pertaining to construction of groins have not been complied with. A formal agreement with the cooperating agency (Ciy of Virginia Beach and the Virginia Beach Erosion Commission) for the initial beach restoration was entered into on October 19, 1955. An amendment to the original agreement, covering periodic nourishment, was entered into on November 1, 1963. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preconstruction Planning of the 1974 modification was continued at a cost of $352,711. Local interests were reimbursed $340,816 for the Federal share of periodic nourishment of the beach, and Federal costs pertinent thereto amounted to $3,641. Condition at end of fiscal year. Beach restoration by local interests was commenced in June 1952 and completed in August 1953. Construction of groins has been deferred indefinitely. Local interests acquired their own dredging plant and borrow areas and replenished the beach until 1975 when the borrow areas could not be extended. During fiscal year 1975, a 5-year supply of beach nourishment material was stockpiled at nearby Fort Story and transported to the beach by local interests. In 1979 local interests acquired the Seatack Borrow Area to serve as a long-term supply of nourishment material. Preconstruction planning is continuing on the 1974 modification. 22. BEACH EROSION CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION None this fiscal year. 23. OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL (See Table 5-D at end of chapter.) 24. GATHRIGHT DAM AND LAKE MOOMAW, VA. Location. Site of proposed Gathright Dam is on Jackson River, a tributary of James River at mile 43.4 and Alleghany County. Gathright Dam site is in reach of Jackson River know as the Gorge. About 19 miles upstream from Covington, Virginia at the elevation at the top of the conservation pool, Gathright Reservoir will extend upstream about 9 miles (see Falling Spring and Mountain Grove, Virginia-West Virginia quadrangles of geological survey.) Esisting project. Gathright Dam consists of a 1,172-foot long rolled rock filled dam with an impervious core, with a top at elevation 1,684.5; outlet works consisting of a concrete intake structure located in the right back 500 feet upstream from the axis of the dam; a 1,075-foot long outlet tunnel through the right abutment and a stilling basin; and a 2,450-foot long fixed crest emergency spillway excavated in a low saddle in the divide at Fortney Branch, about 2.5 miles south of the dam. Discharges through the maximum conservation pool elevation 1,582 will be provided for water quality control. The reservoir area at elevation 1,582 will be 2,530 acres. A total of 302,000 acre-feet of storage between elevation 1,582 and the spillway crest (elevation 1,663.5) will be reserved for flood control. At the spillway crest the reservoir will have an area of 4,540 acres. Estimated Federal cost (1979) is $83,000,000. (See Table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Lands and damages continued at a direct cost of $13,570. Contract cost for Morris Hill Recreation area and the Administration-Visitors Center amounted to $824,326. Administration of project's public use areas was transferred to the U.S. Forest Service jurisdiction during the fiscal year. During the fiscal year, work was completed on the contract for the relocation of Route 600 at a cost of $127,089. Miscellaneous contract costs and purchase orders for relocations amounted to $34,164. Archeological contract work on the project was completed at a cost of $46,500. Miscellaneous contract cost for recreational facilities and the dam amounted to $67,132. Contract costs for the Collection Trench completed during the fiscal year amounted to $54,115. Contract cost for the electric connection in the recreation facility area amounted to $416,252. 5-12 NORFOLK, VA., DISTRICT Micellaneous hired labor work, surface instrumentation, stream gaging, litigation, construction facilities, buildings, grounds, utilities, and permanent operating equipment amounted to $178,025. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs of the project amounted to $475,160. Operation and maintenace of the completed portions of the project amounted to $984,540. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project became operational for flood control in December 1979. Overall, the project is complete except for finalization of minor contract work. 25. RICHMOND FILTRATION PLANT, VA. Location. The city of Richmond's Water Filtration Plant lies on the north side of the James River. The plant is separated on the south from the river by the Chesapeake and Ohio Railway embankment. The Old James River and Kanawha Canal forms the plant's northern boundary. The canal is owned by the C &O Railroad Company; however, the city of Richmond has acquired all water rights. (See Richmond and Bon Air, Virginia quadrangles of geological survey.) Previous projects. None. Existing project. The project will provide for protection of the filtration plant- proper. The basic plan provides for inclosing three sides of the plant and tying into high ground. The walls willhave an average heightof about 9 feet with a top elevation of 117.0 feet m.s.l. The degree of protection provided is equivalent to the Standard Project Flood. A total of 11.5 acres will be protected from the design flood having a recurrence of 360 years over the project economic life of 50 years. Local cooperation. Requirements are as follows: (a) Provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, rights-of-way, including suitable borrow and excavated material disposal areas as determined by the Chief of Engineers, necessary for construction of the project. (b) Accomplish without cost to the United States all alterations and relocations of buildings, transportation facilities, storm drains, utilities, and other structures and improvements made necessary by the construction; (c) Hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works, not including damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; (d) Maintain and operate all the works after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army. (e) The city in" acquiring land easements, rights-of-way, and spoil disposal areas for project construction, operation and maintenance will comply with the provisions of the "Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970," Public Law 91-646 approved 2 January 1971; (f) The city will comply with Section 601 or Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Public Law 88-352) to wit: that no person shall be excluded from participation in, denied the benefits of, or subjected to discrimination in connection with this project on the grounds of race, color, or national origin. Operation and results during fiscal year. Phase .II engineering continued with the preparation of plans and specifications during the fiscal year at a cost of $120,375. Condition at end of fiscal year. Finalization of the plans and specifications necessary before project construction is continuing. 26. RICHMOND, VA. Location. Located in the piedmont plateau of Virginia, the city of Richmond is bordered on the north by Henrico County and on the south by Chesterfield County. The James River flows directly through Richmond separating its business district into the Shockoe Creek area on the north bank and the southside industrial commercial complex. (See Richmond, Virginia quadrangle of geological survey.) Previous projects. None. Existing project. The project will provide for construction of floodwalls and levees to protect against a flood 15.4 feet above the' March 1936 flood, or 6.4 feet above the June 1972 flood on both sides of the river in the downtown area. This improvement will provide protection against the Standard Project Flood (SPF). The probability that one or more flood events will exceed the SPF in Richmond during the 100-year life of the project is about 14 percent. The floodwalls and levees are as follows: (a) Shockoe Creek area - 1,840 feet of cantilever floodwall, 2,280 feet of concrete gravity floodwall, 12 closures, and 1 pumping station; (b) Southside area - 750 feet of cantilever floodwall, 10,280 feet of earth levee, 10 closures, and 2 pumping stations. Local cooperation. Requirements are as follows: a. Hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction, operation, and maintenance of the project except where such damages are due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors. 5-13 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 b. Maintain and operate all the works after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army c. Adopt and enforce adequate regulations to reduce flood damages along the James River in the area within the city of Richmond, Virginia, that will not be protected by the recommended improvements d. Prescribe and enforce regulations to prevent encroachment on ponding areas necessary for the proper functioning of the project e. Publicize flood plain information in the areas concerned and provide this information to zoning and other regulatory agencies for their guidance and leadership in preventing unwise future devlopment in the flood plain and in adopting such regulations as may be necessary to insure compatibility between future development and protection levels provided by the project. f. At least annually, inform affected interests regarding the limitation of the protection afforded by the project g. The city in acquiring land, easements, rights-of-way, and spoil disposal areas for project construction, operation, and maintenance will comply with the provisions of the "Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970," Public Law 91-646, approved 2 January 1971. h. The city will comply with Section 601 of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Public Law 88- 352), to-wit: that no person shall be excluded from participation in, denied the benefits of, or subjected to discrimination in connection with this project on grounds of race, color, or national origin. Terminal facilities. None. Operations and results during fiscal year. The Phase I report was approved by the Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbor. Planning cost amounted to $24,170. Condition at end of fiscal year. The BERH report is currently being prepared for submission to the Office of the Chief of Engineers. 27. VIRGINIA BEACH STREAMS CANAL NUMBER 2, VA. Location. The canal number 2 watershed with a drainage area of about 37 square miles lies within the city of Virginia Beach. The city consists of 255 square miles of primarily low, flat terrain with about 75 percent of the area below elevation 15-feet, mean sea level. The existing canal, from the Eastern Branch of the Lynnhaven River to the North Landing River is about 12 miles long and follows a north-south alignment. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 12205.) Previous project. None. Existing project. The project calls for a channel starting north of Virginia Beach Blvd. Bridge 1.1 miles south to a point approximately 600 feet east of the Lynnhaven Parkway bridge over London Bridge Creek. Channel dimensions in this section would be -9 feet m.s.l. with an 80- foot bottom width. Top width would be approximately 116 feet. From the southern end of this channel, a land cut would be made following the alignment of an existing drainage ditch to rejoin the waterway south of the Magic Hollow subdivision. Channel dimensions would be -5 feet m.s.l. with a 60-foot bottom width. along one side of the land cut would be a 20-foot-wide cut at 0 m.s.l. for marsh planting. Top width would vary with the ground level but will average 152 feet and length would be 2.3 miles. The London Bridge Creek Channel south of the 1.1 mile section will be maintained at it's present dimensions. Local cooperation. Requirements are as follows: a. Provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way, including suitable borrow and disposal areas for excavated material as determined by the Chief of Engineers, necessary for the construction of the project, b. Accomplish without cost to the United States all alterations and relocations of buildings, transportation facilities, storm drains, utilities and other structures and improvements made necessary by the construction, excluding railroad bridges and approaches and facilities necessary for the normal interception and disposal of local interior drainage at the line of protection, c. Hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works, not including damages due to the fault or negligence of -the United States or its contractors, d. Maintain and operate all the works after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army, e. At least annualy inform affected interests regarding the limitations of the protection afforded by the project, f. Publicize flood plain information in the areas concerned, provide this information to zoning and other regulatory agencies for their guidance and leadership in preventing unwise future development in the flood plain, and adopt such regulations as may be necessary to prevent unwise development within those areas that would be inundated by floods of tidal and fluvial origin which would be expected to occur once within a 100-year period. Provided further that, unless otherwise stated in these recommendations, the exact amount of non-Federal contributions shall be determined 5-14 NORFOLK, VA., DISTRICT by the Chief of Engineers prior to project construction. Operation and results during fiscal year. Phase I planning in progress at the beginning of the fiscal year was completed. Phase II planning was initiated and in progress at years end. Costs amounted to $24,232. Condition at end of fiscal year. Preconstruction planning is continuing. 28. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 5-G at end of chapter.) 29. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Five reconnaissance reports: Old Town Creek, Colonial Heights, VA; Calfpasture River, VA; Tye River and South Fork of Rockfish Rivers, VA; the Meherrin and Nottoway Rivers, Southhampton County, VA; and Garden Creek Area, Mathews County, VA were completed during the fiscal year. Two reconnaissance reports: Glasgow Area, Rockbridge, VA and Scottsville, VA were in progress at the end of the fiscal year. 30. SURVEYS Total cost of surveys during the fiscal year amounted to $1,437,039 of which $130,974 was for navigation studies; $181,084 was for flood control studies; $77,314 was for Beach Erosion Control studies; $55 for Review for Deauthorization Program, $583 for review of watershed plans of the Soil Conservation Service; $7,020 was for Water Quality Management; $10,021 was for Coastal Zone Management; $26,093 for technical participation in Water Resources Planning by the Commonwealth of Virginia; $1,050 for National Wild & Scenic Rivers; $5,000 for Technical and Engineering Streambank Erosion; $376,881 for Flood Control Local Protection, Legislative Phase I studies; and $620,964 was spent on the Inspection of Dams Program. 31. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA During the fiscal year cost of Flood Plain Management Services was $119,257. Major emphasis during the fiscal year was on management and technical services. 5-15 TABLE 5-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See SeSceteioton PPrToojetaclt Funding FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 o SeCpot1s 9t 8to In Text 30 Sept 1981 1. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway, between Norfolk, Va. and the Saint John's River, Fla. (Norfolk District) (Regular Funds) 2. Baltimore Harbor Channels (Norfolk District) (Regular Funds) 3. Cape Charles City Harbor, Va 4. Chincoteague Inlet, Va. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 5. Hampton Creek, Va. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 6. Hampton Roads and arors _ Norfolk and Newport News, Va. Collection and Removal of Drift (Regular Funds) 7. James River, Va. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 8. Lafayette River, Va. (Regular Funds) New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major rehab. Approp. Cost Recreation Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 1,435,000 1,441,125 (-)25,129 20,000 16,857 2,165 2,165 286,000 277,873 13,126 13,126 1,736,937 1,665,970 (-)12 3,330 13,178 13,178 162,000 163,479 8,049 8,049 1,688,000 2,444,800 1,767,686 2,443,074 32,000 30,931 14,108 15,177 10,026 112,628 10,026 112,628 429,000 855,713 435,114 853,155 480,294 59,406 30,462 509,238 - - 14,400 - - - - 14,400 146,000 214,000 133,000 177,000 135,208 216,376 140,867 148,731 278,000 365,029 15,000 35,000 49,000 39,445 11,063 11,063 262,000 261,840 130,000 17,977 15,643 15,643 1,597,195 1,124,000 521,781 1,895,528 50,000 16,000 - 66,000 - (-)1,068 7,659 106,205 19,313 16,365 19,313 16,365 3,688,372(1) 3,688,372(1) 35,318,495(2) 35,272,414(2) 479,947 479,947 59,871 59,871 8,015.070(3) 8,015.070(3) 5,807,186(3) 5,807,186(3) 622.644(4) 622,644(4) 451,186 451,186 227,000 227,000 1,732,713 1,729,620 3,850 3,850 186,237(5) 186,237(5) 1,116,952 1,116,952 62,969 62,969 90,636 90,636 2,147,619 2,117,530 7,639,909(5) 7,639,909(5) 19,606,797 19,083,159 244,456 244,456 262,271 255,624 111,616 111,616 5-16 NORFOLK, VA., DISTRICT TABLE 5-A (Cont.) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Project Funding FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 Total In Text 30 Sept 1981 (Contributed Funds) 9. Norfolk Harbor Va. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 10. Nottoway River, Va. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 11. Starlings Creek Va. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 12. Supervision of Harbor of Hampton Roads, Va. (Regular Funds). 13. Tangier Channel, Va. (Regular Funds) 14. Thimble Shoal Channel, Va. (Regular Funds) 15. Tylers Beach, Va. (Regular Funds) 16. Waterway on the Coast of Va. (Regular Funds) 17. Winter Harbor, Va. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost - - 125,000 - - - - 111,424 114,000 2,010,880 2,850,000 - 107,950 1,998,099 2,774,403 30,152 3,568,067 2,661,800 2,965,500 2,836,562 3,383,049 2,896,837 2,946,346 2,315,198 - 30,000 125,544 - - - 30,000 125,544 46,000 66,000 (-)13,000 (-)8,705 5,926 24,961 11,981 7,352 43,000 43,000 - - - - 30,145 12,855 - - 14,830 185,134 981 14,830 119,588 66,527 32,687 32,687 - 25,705 - - - 25,705 - - 188,000 194,400 151,000 235,000 192,128 177,393 169,070 228,949 92,438 65,382 254,560 125,501 65,178 254,764 60,864 60,862 6,925 12,718 59,693 1,117,000 6,925 12,718 59,693 312,346 - - - 15,000 - - - 8,796 21,219 (-)1,491 30,031 244,815 16,665 3,063 30,031 244,815 366,828 81,000 224,000 460,000 972,984 83,808 224,343 461,065 13,350 167,065 13,350 112,111 - 15,000 - 15,000 11,425 20,440 66,379 20,440 5-17 188,962 175,386 36,399,115(6) 36,334,839(6) 47,467,558(7) 46,912,074(7) 179,480 179,480 44,295 44,295 43,000 43,000 66,242 66,242 596,651 596,651 2,973 2,973 25,705 25,705 3,960,928 3,953,676 116,550 116,550 1,375,045 1,375,043 13,534,967 13,534,967 6,650,294 5,845,640 78,268 72,064 381,097 381,097 850,498 850,498 6,425,332 6,423,801 171,334(7) 171,334(7) 290,095 290,095 15,000 15,000 TABLE 5-A (Cont.) REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Project In Text Funding FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 Total Cost to 30 Sept 1981 21. Va. Beach, Va. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 24. Gathright Lake, Va. (Regular Funds) 25. Richmond Filtration Plant, Va. 26. Richmond Va. 27. Va. Beach Streams New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 200,000 56,000 300,000 326,000 116,924 153,751 294,771 344,457 8,514,000 8,658,000 2,500,000 1,846,000 7,367,694 7,956,185 6,600,227 2,236,333 419,000 711,000 876,000 989,000 407,135 700,437 847,395 984,540 75,000 100,224 198,000 98,000 74,234 45,908 185,974 120,375 111,000 499,896 172,000 20,000 110,896 485,815 182,014 24,170 - 100,000 82,000 120,000 - 96,548 84,244 24,232 (1) Includes $292,096 for previous projects. (2) Includes $52,804 for previous projects. (3) Cost prior to 1942 are included in the project "Baltimore Harbor and Channels, Md." (Baltimore District). Cost listed are for York Spit Channel, Va.; Rappahannock Shoal Channel, Va.; and Cape Henry Channel, Va. (4) Includes $445,291 military funds expended from new work dredging on existing project and $83,041 expended from military funds for construction of a wharf. (5) Includes $763,000 for previous projects. (6) Includes $2,561,704 for previous projects and new work. (7) Includes $72,039 for previous projects. 5-18 2,766,195 2,765,838 204,683 204,683 80,684,527 79,949,582 3,125,000 3,063,488 471,224 426,491 802,896 802,895 302,000 205,024 NORFOLK, VA., DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 3, 1899 ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA. AND ST. JOHNS RIVER, FLA. (NORFOLK DISTRICT) (See Section 1 of Text) Existing project dimensions and original route, waterway from Norfolk, Va. to sounds of North Carolina July 25, 1912 Original route to Norfolk-Beaufort Inlet section July 25, 1912 Purchase of Albemarle & Chesapeake Co. Canal Mar. 3, 1925 Purchase of Lake Drummond Canal (Dismal Swamp Canal) July 3, 1930 Construct a tidal lock at Great Bridge at a cost not to exceed $500,000 June 26, 1934 Operating and care of works of improvement provided for with' funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors Mar. 2, 1945 Construct dikes for protection of canal property against floodtides BALTIMORE HARBOR AND CHANNELS (NORFOLK DISTRICT) (See Section 2 of Text) CAPE HENRY CHANNEL, VA. (See Section 2 of Text) July 3, 1958 A channel 42 feet deep, 1,000 feet wide Dec. 31, 1970 channel depth increased to 50 feet RAPPAHANNOCK SHOAL CHANNEL, VA (See Section 2 of Text) July 3, 1958 Channel 42 feet deep and 800 feet wide Dec. 31, 1970 Channel width increased to 1,000 feet and depth increased to 50 feet. YORK SPIT CHANNEL, VA. (See Section 2 of Text) Mar. 3 1905 Channel 35 feet deep, 600 feet wide Mar. 4, 1913 Channel width increased to 1,000 feet July 3, 1930 Channel depth increased to 37 feet Mar. 2, 1945 Channel depth increased to 39 feet July 3, 1958 Channel depth increased to 42 feet Dec. 31, 1970 Channel depth increased to 50 feet CAPE CHARLES CITY HARBOR (See Section 3 of Text) Sept 19, 1890 Dredging a channel through Cherrystone Inlet and bar 16 feet deep and 100 and 200 feet wide, respectively; dredging an entrance channel 100 feet wide, 16 feet deep; dredging a harbor 11 acres in area, 14 feet deep; and construct stone jetties on each side of entrance to harbor. June 20, 1938 Modified to provide a basin 10 feet deep, 180 feet wide, and 420 feet long, at head of Mud Creek, with a channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide, extending to that depth in present harbor, flaring through its inner 250 feet to a width of 180 feet. Mar. 2, 1945 A channel 18 feet deep and 500 feet wide from that depth in Chesapeake Bay to harbor entrance, thence a basin in harbor of same depth 600 to 1,000 feet wide and 3,000 feet long. The harbor of refuge was approved in 1966 by the Chief of Engineers under authority of Section 107, River and Harbor Act of 1960. CHINCOTEAGUE INLET,VA (See Section 4 of Text) July 14, 1960 Existing project (Sec. 107) Sept. 19, 1980 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 Oct. 27, 1965 HAMPTON CREEK, VA. (See Section 5 of Text) A channel 9 feet deep, varying from 300 feet wide on bar at mouth to 200 feet wide at Hampton Highway Bridge. A channel 12 feet deep and 200 feet wide across Hampton Flats and 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide in Hampton Creek A channel in Herberts Creek 80 to 100 feet wide and 12 feet deep from Hampton Creek to Kecoughtan Roads. Delete requirement for providing spoil-disposal area. H. Doc. 317, 54th Cong., 1st sess. AR 1896 H. Doc. 131, 55th Congs., 3d sess. AR 1899 H. Doc. 391, 62d Congs. 2d sess. H. Doc. 589, 62d Cong. 2d sess. Rivers & Harbors Comm. Doc. 67th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 23, 71st Cong., 1st sess. (1) Not available H. Doc., 117, 76th Cong. 1st sess.. H. Doc. 86, 85th Cong., 1st sess. Chief of Engineers Report Sept. 21, 1970 H. Doc. 86. 85th Cong., 1st sess. Chief of Engineers Report, Sept. 21, 1970 H. Doc. 186, 57th cong. 2d sess. H. Doc. 190, 62d cong., 3d sess. H. Doc. 29, 71st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 741, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 86, 85th Cong., 1st seas. Chief of Engineers Report Sept. 21, 1970 H. Doc. 29, 51st Cong., 1st sess. and Annual Report 1890, p. 971 H. Doc. 580, 75th Cong., 3d sess., (Contains latest published map.) H. Doc. 90, 79th Cong., 1st sess. (Contains latest published map.) Approved in 1972 Annual Report, 1889, p. 974 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 34, 72d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 559, 76th Cong., 3d sess. (2) H. Doc. 201, 89th Cong., 1st sess. 5-19 TABLE 5-B REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 5-B (Cont.) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Act Work Authorized Documents HAMPTON ROADS AND HARBORS OF NORFOLK AND NEWPORT NEWS, VA. COLLECTION AND REMOVAL OF DRIFT (See Section 6 of Text) May 17, 1950 Collection and removal of floating debris in Hampton Roads and its tributary waters JAMES RIVER, VA (See Section 7 of Text) July 5, 1884 Channel 22 feet deep from mouth to Richmond and construct spur and training dikes June 13, 1902 Extension of improvement to Richmond lock gate Mar. 3, 1905 Form a turning basin by widening channel at Richmond July 3, 1930 Channel 25 feet deep mouth to Richmond Deepwater Terminal Aug. 26, 1937 Removal of Trigg cofferdam Mar. 2, 1945 Turning basin at Richmond Harbor May 17, 1950 Maintaining turning basin at Richmond Deepwater Terminal Oct. 23, 1962 Channel depth increased to 35 feet to Richmond Deepwater Terminal LAFAYETTE RIVER, VA. (See Section 8 of Text) Aug. 26, 1937 Channel 8 feet deep and 100 feet wide from deep water in Hampton Roads to Hampton Blvd. bridge. July 14, 1960 Knitting Mill Creek modification (Sec. 107) July 14, 1960 East Haven Creek modification (Sec. 107) NORFOLK HARBOR, VA (See Section 9 of Text) Hampton Roads and Elizabeth River Mar. 2, 1907 Channel 30 feet deep to Navy Yard June 25, 1910 Depth of 35 feet to Navy Yard Aug. 8, 1917 Depth of 40 feet and width of 750 feet to mouth of Sourthern Branch Sept. 3, 1954 Widen 40-foot channel to 1,500 feet from 40-foot contour in in Hampton Roads to a point just south of Norfolk International Terminal Oct. 27, 1965 45 feet deep, Ft. Wool to Lambert Point, 800 feet wide Norfolk International Terminal to Lambert Point. SOUTHERN BRANCH June 25, 1910 Channel with a depth of 22 and 25 feet. Aug. 8, 1917 Depth of 40 feet and width of 450 feet from mouth to Belt Line RR Bridge. Mar. 30, 1925 Channel 30 feet deep and 375 feet wide to Virginia Ry. bridge; thence 25 feet deep and generally 200 feet wide to Norfolk & Western RR Bridge Aug. 30, 1935 Depth of 25 feet and width of 200 feet from Norfolk & Western RR bridge to a point 2,500 feet above with a turning basin 500 feet square. June 30, 1948 Approach and turning area 40 feet deep and a maximum width of 830 feet opposite Norfolk Naval Shipyard; thence a channel 35 feet deep and 375 and 250 feet wide to a point 1900 feet above Norfolk & Western RR bridge and a turning basin 35 feet deep and 600 feet at upstream end Oct. 27, 1965 45 feet deep Belt Line bridge to Old Virginia bridge, 35-foot deep turning basin opposite St. Julians Creek. Oct. 22, 1976 Extend existing 35-foot project to a channel 35 feet deep and 250 feet wide upstream 1.5 miles to the Norfolk and Portsmouth Belt Line RR bridge and a turning basin at the mouth of Mains Creek 35 feet deep and 800 feet square. EASTERN BRANCH Mar. 2, 1907 Width of 500 feet and depth of 25 and 22 feet Removal of shoals at mouth Mar. 3, 1925 Depth of 25 feet and width of 200 feet from Norfolk & Western RR bridge to Virginia RR bridge July 3, 1930 30-foot channel to a point opposite terminal of Imperial Tobacco Co. in Berkley Mar. 2, 1945 Depth of 25 feet and width of 300 feet from Norfolk & Western RR bridge to Campostella Bridge Specified in Act S. Ex. Doc. 714, 47th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 234, 56th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 234, 56th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 314, 71st Cong., 2d sess. Rivers & Harbors Comm. Doc. 68 74th Cong., 1st sess. (2) H. Doc. 738, 77th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 191, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 586, 87th Cong. 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Comm. Doc. 5, 75th Cong., 1st sess. approved in 1967 Approved in 1979 H. Doc. 381, 59th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc 551, 61st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 140, 65th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 122, 83rd Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 187, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 551, 61st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 140, 65th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc 226, 68th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 182, 73d cong., 2d sess. (3) H. Doc. 545, 80th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 187, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 355, 94th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 373, 59th Cong., 1st sess. Specified in act H. Doc. 226, 68th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 37, 71st Cong. 1st sess(4) H. Doc. 224, 76th Cong., 1st sess. 5-20 NORFOLK, VA., DISTRICT TABLE 5-B (Cont.) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Act Work Authorized Documents WESTERN BRANCH Mar. 4, 1913 Channel 24 feet deep and 300 & 400 feet wide to West Norfolk highway bridge July 3, 1930 For 18-foot channel to a point about 3,000 feet above West Norfolk highway bridge SCOTTS CREEK July 3, 1930 Channel 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide to a point 100 feet above the Atlantic Coast Line RR bridge. ANCHORAGES June 25, 1910 30-foot anchorage at Lamber Point Aug. 8, 1917 12-foot anchorage at Pinner Point Sept. 3, 1954 An anchorage 38 feet deep and 1,500 feet square; anchorage 35 feet deep and 1,500 feet square; and an anchorage 20 feet deep, 1,000 feet wide and 3,000 feet long. Oct. 27, 1965 Two anchorages opposite Sewells Point 45 feet deep with 1,200-foot swinging radius July 14, 1960 (Sec. 107) Aug. 30, 1935 July 14, 1960 (Sec. 107) Mar. 2, 1919 Jan. 3, 1934 (P.W.A. Act) and Sug. 30 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 July 14, 1960 (Sec. 107) Aug. 8, 1917 Sept. 3, 1954 Oct. 27, 1965 July 14, 1960 (Sec. 107) July 14, 1960 (Sec. 107) June 25, 1910 Mar. 2, 1945 Oct. 27, 1965 (Sec. 107) NOTTOWAY RIVER, VA (See Section 10 of Text) Existing project STARLINGS CREEK, VA. (See Section 11 of Text) Entrance channel and turning basin Harbor of Refuge TANGIER CHANNEL, VA (See Section 13 of Text) Channel from Tangier Sound and anchorage Changed channel and anchorage dimensions Modified project dimensions Channel across Tangier Island THIMBLE SHOAL CHANNEL, VA (See Section 14 of Test) A channel 40 feet deep and 750 feet wide. Channel width increased to 1,000 feet with side channels on either side 32 feet deep and 450 feet wide. Channel 45 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide. TYLERS BEACH, VA (See Section 15 of Text) Existing Project Jetty Modification WATERWAY ON THE COAST OF VIRGINIA (See Section 16 of Text) Existing project adopted. Project modified Project widened to 100 feet, partially relocated, and incorporated in Deleware Bay-Chesapeake Bay Waterway in Deleware- Maryland-Virginia. WINTER HARBOR, VA (See Section 17 of Text) May 17, 1950 Channel 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide and a mooring and turning basin of the same depth VIRGINIA BEACH, VA (See Section 21 of Text) Sept. 3, 1954 Project authorized Oct. 23, 1962 Project modified Mar. 7, 1974 Project modification authorized for Phase I Advanced Engineering and Design H. Doc. 556, 62nd Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 265, 70th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 189, 70th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 551, 61st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 605, 63rd Cong., 2d sess (1) S. Doc. 122, 83rd Cong., 2d sess (1) H. Docs. 187 & 143, 89th Cong., 1st sess. Approved in 1979 Rivers and Harbors Comm. Doc. 46, 74th Cong., 1st sess. Approved 1963 H. Doc. 107, 63rd Cong., 1st sess. Rivers & Harbors Comm. Doc. 51, 72nd Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 141, 77th Cong., 1st sess. Approved in 1964 H. Doc. 140, 65th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 122, 83d Cong., 2d sess. (1) H. Doc. 187, 89th Cong., 1st sess. Approved in 1966 Approved in 1981 H. Doc. 957, 60th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 268, 76th Cong., 1st sess. Approved in 1970 H. Doc. 319, 81st Cong., 1st sess.(1) H. Doc. 186, 83rd Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 382, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 365, 92nd Cong., 2d sess. 5-21 Jul Oct Oct Oct ( REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 5-B (Cont.) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Act Work Authorized GATHRIGHT DAM AND LAKE MOOMAW, VA (See Section 24 of Text) y 24, 1946 Project authorized H. Doc. 32l RICHMOND FILTRATION PLANT, VA (See Section 25 of Text) t. 22, 1976 Project authorized H. Doc. 54 RICHMOND, VA (See Section 26 of Text) t. 22, 1976 Project authorized for Phase I Advanced Engineering H. Doc. 64: VA. BEACH STREAMS, CANAL NO. 2, VA. BEACH, VA. (See Section 27 of Text) t. 27, 1965 Project authorized H. Doc 640 Sec. 201) Documents 5, 61st Cong., 2d sess. 3, 94th Cong., 2d sess. 2, 94th Cong., 2d sess. ), 94th Cong., 2d sess. (1) Contains latest published map. (2) 16 feet at mean low water. (3) Included in Emergency Refief Administration Program May 23, 1935. (4) For latest published map, see H. Doc. 1246, 62d Cong., 3d sess. 5-22 - --- --- - . .... ----- TABLE 5-C NORFOLK, VA., DISTRICT ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK VA. AND ST. JOHNS RIVER, FLORIDA: DATA RELATIVE TO THE COMPLETED LOCKS (See Section 1 of Text) Dimensions Greatest Depth on Length__ Width Avail- Miter Sills ear of able Miter Sills Opened Miles Cham- for Full Lnaracter to from Location ber Width Lift Upper Lower of Navi- Cost Norfolk, Va. feet (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) Foundation gation 12.4 Albemarle and Chesa- 75 600 2.7 (1) (1) Piles in sand 1932 $499,913 peake Canal (Great and shells Bridge, Va.) 10.7 Dismal Swamp Canal 52 300 12 12 12 Natural earth 1940 348,879 (Deep Creek) with cutoff walls Dismal Swamp Canal 52 300 12 12 13 Natural earth 1941 373,556 33.1 (South Mills, N.C.) with cutoff walls (1) 16 feet at mean low water. TABLE 5-D OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION (See Section 23 of Text) For Last Full Report, See Cost to Sept. 30, 1981 Additional Expenditure Project Annual Report For New Work Expended For Construction Maintenance From Contributed Funds Anderson Park 1979 $471,474 - $176,671 Newport News, Va. Hampton Institute 1976 $156,906 - $175,845 5-23 TABLE 5-E REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS (See Section 18 of Text) Name of Project Date Survey Conducted CONDITION SURVEYS Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Deep Creek Baltimore Harbor & Channels Cape Henry York Spit Channel Chincoteague Inlet Oct 80 Oct 80 Jan 81 Dec 80 Mar 81 James River Goose Hill Channel Richmond Harbor to Deepwater Terminal Rocklanding Shoal Channel Little Creek (River) Lynnhaven Inlet Nansemond River Western Branch Norfolk Harbor Craney Island Anchorage Sewells Point Anchorage Southern Branch 35 Ft. Channel Oyster Channel Starlings Creek Tangier Channel Waterway on the Coast of Virginia Bogues Bay Bradford Bay Burtons Bay Gargathy Inlet Goulds Marsh Channel Hog Neck Creek Kegotank Bay Lewis Creek Northam Narrows Sloop Channel Winter Harbor Mar 81 Oct 80 Sep 81 May & Jul 81 Sep 81 Jul 81 Dec 80 Dec 80 Feb 81 Dec 80 Aug 81 Apr 81 Aug 81 Dec 80 Apr 81 Oct 80 Jul 80 Apr 81 Apr 81 Apr 81 Apr 81 Dec 80 Nov 80 5-24 __ -- TABLE 5-F Project Appomattox Riv Aberdeen Creek, Blackwater Rive] Active portion Broad Creek, Va Deep Creek, New Carters Creek, V Active portion Channel from PI water in Hamp Channel connect Back Creek to Channel to Newi Chesconessex Cr Chincoteague Ba Chincoteague H2 Chowan River, 1N Cockrells Creek. Cranes Creek, V] Davis Creek, Va. Deep Creek, Acci Dymers Creek, V Greenvale Creek Horn Harbor, Va Hoskins Creek, V Jackson Creek, V Jarvis Creek, Va Kings Creek, Va Little Machipong Little River (CreE Locklies Creek, V Lynnhaven Inlet Merherrin River, Milford Haven, Mill Creek, Va. 2 Mulberry Creek, Nandua Creek, \ Nansemond Rive Newport News C Occohannock, C Active portion Onancock River, Oyster Channel, Pagan River, Va Pamunkey River Active portion Parker Creek, V Parrotts Creek, V Portsmouth Har Nansemond O Queens Creek 2 Quinby Creek, V Rappahannock I Rappahannock R Va., 4 Taskinas Creek, NORFOLK, VA., DISTRICT OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Section 19 of Text) For Last Full Cost to Sept. 30, 1981 Report, See Annual Report F For Construction Maintenance F er, Va. 1 1980 $870,341 $831,926 Va. 2 1975 109,643 180,650 r, Va. 2,11 1975 342,118 150,208 .2 1962 27,888 73,572 vport News, Va. 2 1980 288,278 2,040,211 a. 2,3 1951 28,398 3,277 hoebus Va. to deeppton Roads 2 1944 11,500 32,442 ling York River, Va. Slaights Wharf 2 1950 14,855 36,874 port News, Va. 2 1980 8,955,974 3,481,670 eek, Va. 2 1968 25,516 31,889 iy, Va. 2 1980 25,126 166,894 arbor of Refuge, Va. 1978 49,396 18,197 J.C. 2 1975 107,220 - Va. 4 1949 - - a. 1978 6,274 20,576 . 2 1971 97,612 150,934 omack Co., Va. 1974 83,000 30,279 Ta. 2 1953 5,582 4,610 , Va. 2 1980 20,003 195,624 a. 2 1964 13,987 88,488 ia. 2 1977 44,100 616,245 Va. 2 1971 8,500 34,073 .4 1979 39,259 - . 4 1957 5,593 - go River, Va. 2 1972 15,000 54,343 ek), Va. 2,13 1966 168,623 442,033 Va. 2 1928 11,581 8,596 t, Va. 1977 334,725 1,003,539 N.C. 2 1950 47,734 49,591 Va. 2 1950 24,568 29,411 1937 5,445 3,555 Va. 2 1950 2,393 2,458 (a. 2 1950 6,988 38,629 er, Va. 8 1978 167,477 425,303 reek, Va. 2 1962 135,600 111,495 reek, Va. 2 1951 13,859 70,136 Va. 2,5 1963 187,914 426,308 Va. 2 1979 119,117 255,113 .2,6 1950 51,425 283,206 ,Va. 2 1964 31,376 161,183 a. 2 1974 15,530 133,642 Va. 2 1957 37,045 36,883 bor, Va. Channel to rdance Depot 2 1947 165,566 66,162 1979 26,949 101,654 a. 1977 104,176 458,567 iver, Va. 9,10,12 1978 414,633 1,648,602 liver at Bowlers Wharf, 1950 - - Va. 1975 7,479 135 Additional Expenditure or New Work Expended 'rom Contributed Funds 19,300 1,200 2,500 5,700 4,000 2,910 500 16,955 1,350 5-25 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 5-F (Cont.) OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Section 19 of Text) For Last Full Cost to Sept. 30, 1981 Additional Expenditure Project Report, See Annual For New Work Expended Report Construction Maintenance From Contributed Funds For Totuskey Creek, Va. 1970 167,869 444,124 2,000 Urbana Creek, Va. 2,7 1963 55,724 87,431 - Whitings Creek, Va. 1971 21,630 107,765 500 Willoughby Channel, Va. 2 1953 8,500 42,188 Wishart Point Channel, Va. 2 1975 118,762 86,730 30,625 York River, Va. Active portion 2 1958 180,904 232,953 1 Includes $22,500 for previous projects. 7 In addition, $61,087 was expended for rehabilitation 2 Completed. 8 Includes $30,000 for new work and $7,000 for maintenance 3 In addition, $700 for maintenance was expended from cont- for previous projects. ributed funds. 9 In addition, $168,091 was expended for rehabilitation. 4 Inactive 10 Includes $197,146 for previous new work projects. 5 Includes $33,549 for new work and $24,754 for maintenance 11 Includes $15,000 for new work for previous projects. for previous projects. 12 Includes $113,500 for previous maintenance projects. 6 Includes $20,671 for new work for previous projects. 13 Federal funds expended by the U.S. Navy for new work. TABLE 5-G OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 28 of Text) For Last Full Cost to Sept. 30, 1981 Additional Expenditure Project Report, See For New Work Expended Annual Report Construction Maintenance From Contributed Funds For Buena Vista, Va. 1977 $417,900(1) - Newmarket Creek, Va. 1970 1,000,000 10,247 550,097 Norfolk Floodwall, Va. 1973 1,851,933 27,390 516,256 Salem Church Lake, Va. 1976 1,896,716(1)(2) - - (1) Preconstruction planning terminated. (2) Includes $144,785 for previous projects. 5-26 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT* This district comprises central and eastern North Carolina and a portion of south-central Virginia, embraced in drainage basins tributary to the Atlantic Ocean from the southern boundary of Virginia to the Shallotte River, inclusive, with exception of the Meherrin River Basin above Murfreesboro, N. C., the Chowan River Basin above the confluence of the Nottaway and Blackwater Rivers, and the Pasquotank River and its tributaries for navigation only. It includes a portion of the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway from the northern boundary of North Carolina to Little River, S. C., and a portion of the waterway from Norfolk, Va., to the Sounds of North Carolina, south of the north shore of Albemarle Sound. IMPROVEMENTS Flood Control (Cont.) 1. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Between Norfolk, Va. and St. Johns River, Fla. (Wilmington District)................. 6-2 2. Beaufort Harbor, N. C. .......................... 6-3 3. Cape Fear River, N. C. Above Wilmington . ........ 6-3 4. Channel from Back Sound to Lookout Bight, N. C............................6-3 5. Lockwoods Folly River, N. C .................... 6-3 6. Manteo (Shallowbag) Bay, N. C ................... 6-4 7. Morehead City Harbor, N. C. .................... 6-5 8. Ocracoke Inlet, N. C.. .......................... 6-5 9. Silver Lake Harbor, N. C. ........... ....... . .6-5 10. Waterway Connecting Pamlico Sound and Beaufort Harbor, N. C................... . 6-5 11. Wilmington Harbor, N. C. .................... 6-6 12. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys............. 6-7 13. Other Authorized Navigation Projects.............. 6-7 14. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ..................... ........ 6-7 Beach Erosion Control 15. Fort Fisher and Vicinity, N. C....................6-7 16. Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects ................................. 6-7 Flood Control 17. Adkin Branch, Lenoir County, N. C........... .. 6-7 18. Black River, Harnett County, N. C.............. 6-7 19. Cape Fear River Basin, N. C......................6-8 19A. B. Everett Jordan Dam and Lake, N. C. (Formerly New Hope Lake, N. C.)............. 6-8 19B. Randleman Lake, N. C.. .............. 6-8 20. Carolina Beach and Vicinity, N. C...................6-9 21. Deep Creek, Edgecombe County, N. C............6-9 22. Joyce Creek, Camden County, N. C............. 6-9 23. Leesville, Va.-Roanoke River, Sec. 32, Demo. Project................ ......... 6-10 24. Neuse River Basin, N. C............... ..... 6-10 24A. Falls Lake, N. C.................. 6-10 25. Scuppernong River, N. C ............ ... ...... 6-11 26. Wrightsville Beach, N. C.......... ......... . . 6-11 27. Yadkin River Basin, N. C. and S. C................. 6-11 27A. W. Kerr Scott Dam and Reservoir, N. C .......................... 6-11 28. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ............... ...... 6-12 29. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ............... ........... 6-12 30. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization...... ................ 6-12 Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power Page 31. Roanoke River Basin, Va. and N. C.................6-12 31A. John H. Kerr Dam and Reservoir, Va. and N. C ................................ 6-12 31B. Philpott Lake, Va............ ......... ..... 6-12 32. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations ...................... 6-13 General Investigations Page 33. Surveys ....................... ......... 613 34. Collection and Study of Basic Data .......................... 6-14 *All costs and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. Other tables referenced in the text also appear at the end of this chapter. 61 Navigation Page (Page) Navigation 1. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA. AND ST. JOHNS RIVER, FLA. (WILMINGTON DISTRICT) Location. The project is located on the east coast of the United States, between Norfolk, Va., and St. Johns River, Florida. The section within Wilmington District begins at the Virginia-North Carolina State line and extends generally southerly and southwestwardly to Little River, S. C., a total of 308 statute miles. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 830 to 842, inclusive.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1915, 1926, 1932, and 1938. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a waterway, 12 feet deep, with widths varying from 90 feet in land cuts to 300 feet in open waters; the construction, operation and maintenance of suitable bridges; saltwater-intrusion preventive measures in the vicinity of Fairfield, N. C.; a channel in Peltier Creek, 6 feet deep and 50 feet wide from the Intracoastal Waterway in Bogue Sound to and including a basin in Peltier Creek, 6 feet deep, 200 feet wide, and 600 feet long; a channel, 6 feet deep and 90 feet wide between the Intracoastal Waterway and the gorge in Bogue Inlet; a channel, 12 feet deep and 90 feet wide to a turning basin, 200 feet wide and 350 feet long, at Swansboro; a channel, 6 feet deep and 90 feet wide in New River Inlet, and a connecting channel of the same dimensions to the Intracoastal Waterway near the mouth of New River; a channel, 10 feet deep, and 90 feet wide in New River, between the Intracoastal Waterway and the Seaboard Coastline Railroad bridge at Jacksonville, N. C.; a channel through New Topsail Inlet, 8 feet deep and 150 feet wide and a channel from New Topsail Inlet to the Intracoastal Waterway by way of Old Topsail Creek, 7 feet deep and 80 feet wide; a channel, 7 feet deep and 80 feet wide, in Banks Channel, from New Topsail Inlet, paralleling the barrier beach, to the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway; a channel, 14 feet deep and 400 feet wide, across the ocean bar at Masonboro Inlet, with suitable jetties at the entrance, thence 12 feet deep and 90 feet wide to the channel of the Intracoastal Waterway at Wrightsville by way of Banks and Motte Channels; a turning basin, 15 feet deep, 300 feet wide, and 700 feet long, on the east side of Banks Channel near Masonboro Inlet, with three 15-pile dolphins therein; a channel, 6 feet deep, 80 feet wide, and 8,000 feet long, to and including a turning basin of the same depth, 130 feet wide and 180 feet long, at Carolina Beach; a yacht basin, 230 feet wide, 450 feet long, and 12 feet deep, at the town of Southport, connected to the waterway by a suitable channel of the same depth; and maintenance of the general navigation features of the North Carolina State Ports Authority Small- Boat Harbor at Southport, consisting of an entrance channel, 150 feet wide and 400 feet long, an eastern harbor-access channel, 70 feet wide and 430 feet long, a western harbor-access channel, 60 feet wide and 185 feet long, to a turning basin, 180 feet wide and 550 feet long, all to a depth of 6 feet. Length of channels and basins total 347.1 miles. A modification providing for the replacement of five Federally owned and operated highway bridges was authorized in December 1970. A modification providing for 100 percent Federal funding for Wilkerson Creek and Coinjock bridges was authorized in October 1976. Estimated Federal Cost is $46,500,000 (1981). The six mooring basins along the AIWW were deauthorized 5 August 1977 under authority of Sec. 12, PL 93-251.The south jetty at Masonboro Inlet has an estimated Federal cost of $8,610,000 (1981) and is complete except for the training wall. A Section 111 project to mitigate damages caused by the north jetty was authorized in October 1980 at an estimated Federal cost of $1,000,000 and was completed in April 1981. Plane of reference is mean low water. In the waterway north of Neuse River, variations in water surface due to winds seldom exceed 2 feet above or below mean stage. Between Beaufort and the Cape Fear River, normal tidal range varies from 3.5 feet at the inlets to 1 foot at points between. Average range of tide is 4 feet on the ocean side of Bogue Inlet and 2.5 feet just inside the inlet. At New River, tidal range varies from 3.5 feet at the inlet to 1 foot at the head of the marshes and zero at Tar Landing, 31 miles above. From Cape Fear River, N. C., to Little River, S. C., mean tidal range varies between 4.7 feet in Cape Fear River and 4 feet at the intermediate inlets, and 2 feet at points midway between the inlets. On October 15, 1954 (Hurricane Hazel), the tide at Holden Beach reached an elevation of 17.6 feet. (See Table 6-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date except for the modification. The State of North Carolina has agreed to keep the bridges toll free and upon completion of each bridge, accept maintenance, replacement, and ownership responsibilities thereof. They have withdrawn their offer to contribute 25 percent of the first cost. The Water Resources Act of 1976 modified the terms of local cooperation to delete the non- Federal cost-sharing requirement for the Wilkerson Creek and Coinjock bridges. The three remaining bridges were not included in this modification and are awaiting reauthorization to reflect 100 percent Federal funding. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Engineering and design for replacement of two highway bridges cost $451,198, environmental studies cost $12,756, and construction cost $1,232,919. Cost adjustments for the south jetty caused a negative cost of -$8,767. Final E&D cost $412. Between December 6, 1980 and April 11, 1981, the contract dredge Essex deposited 245,203 cubic yards of material on Wrightsville Beach at a cost of $870,299 to mitigate erosion caused by Masonboro Inlet. This work was accomplished in connection with restoration of the Wrightsville Beach project and maintenance dredging on the AIWW. Maintenance: During intermittent periods the U.S. sidecasting dredge Merritt removed 152,957 cubic yards from shoals in New River Inlet at a cost of $228,121 and 71,564 cubic yards from shoals in Bogue Inlet at a cost of $137,529. During intermittent periods the U. S. hopper dredge Currituck removed 29,650 cubic yards from shoals in Bogue Inlet at a cost of $30,300, and 68,262 cubic yards from shoals in New Topsail Inlet at a cost of $133,564. During intermittent periods the U. S. snagboat Snell conducted clearing and snagging operations and probing operations at a cost of $85,374. Between October 1 and November 14, 1980, the contract dredge Marion removed 86,298 cubic yards from shoals in the through channel between the Neuse River and the South Carolina state line at a cost of $240,434. Between July 19 and September 30, 1981, the contract dredge Marion removed 219,947 cubic yards from shoals in the through channel between the Neuse River and the South Carolina state line at a cost of $797,739. Between December 6, 1980 and April 11, 1981, the contract dredge Essex removed 544,517 cubic yards from shoals to realign the Masonboro Inlet channel at a cost of $1,720,972. This material was deposited on Wrightsville Beach, N. C. in conjunction with restoration of the project. The additional pumping costs were borne by local interest and are reflected under the Wrightsville Beach project. Marking of easements along the AIWW cost $136,627. Mosquito control in 62 RF;I'oItT OF TIIF; ('11111' OF F;'\(;I\F;F;It', l . . It\1Y 191 %ILMING'I'()N, N. ('.i,)I SI'RI('TI' disposal areas cost $34,383. Masonboro Inlet monitoring program cost $30,516. Engineering and design for pipeline dredging at Mason's Inlet crossing cost $8,604. Adjustments to prior year dredging costs caused a decrease of -$876. Inspection of five highway bridges cost $30,824. Major repairs to all bridges cost $35,312. Repairs to bridges due to accidents cost $12,936. Condition and operation studies cost $335,271. Five highway bridges and utilities were operated and maintained at a cost of $672,069. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in April 1981, except for the training wall and three tie-up dolphins at Masonboro Inlet, and the bridge replacement program. The new Wilkerson Creek bridge was opened to traffic on July 31, 1981. The Section 111 modification to place material on Wrightsville Beach was completed in April 1981. Total cost for existing project to September 1981 was $72,641,509, of which $24,970,407 was for new work and $47,671,102 was for maintenance. 2. BEAUFORT HARBOR, N. C. Location. The project is just inside Beaufort Inlet, adjacent to Morehead City Harbor. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 420.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1915 and 1938. Existing project. The authorized project provides for stopping erosion at Beaufort Inlet by jetties and sand fences at Fort Macon and Shackleford points and other shore protection; channels 15 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide in Bulkhead and Gallants Channels, except for a depth of 12 feet in the upper 5,000 feet of Gallants Channel; a harbor of refuge in Town Creek 12 feet deep, 400 feet wide, and 900 feet long connected to Gallants Channel by a channel 12 feet deep, 150 feet wide, and 1,400 feet long; a basin 12 feet deep, 600 feet wide in front of the town of Beaufort except for a channel 15 feet deep, 100 feet wide through the basin; a stone bulkhead from Town Marsh across Bird Shoal to the west end of Carrot Island; and a channel in Taylors Creek 15 feet deep, 100 feet wide, extending about 2.6 miles easterly from about opposite Marsh Street in Beaufort to Lennoxville Point at North River, except for an 800-foot-long section at the east end which is 12 feet deep. Total length of channels is 6.9 miles. Average tidal range is 2.5 feet at Beaufort and 3.5 feet at the inlet. (See Table 6-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are fifty waterfront facilities with a total frontage of 2,000 feet. These facilities are adequate for present commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Prior year dredging cost $784. Condition and operation studies cost $12,543. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in October 1965. (For further details see Annual Report 1962.) Costs under existing project to September 30, 1981, were $573,389 for new work and $2,453,038 for maintenance, including $110,078 contributed funds, a total of $3,026,427. 3. CAPE FEAR RIVER, N. C. ABOVE WILMINGTON Location The river is formed by confluence of the Deep and Haw Rivers at Moncure, Chatham County, N. C., and empties into the Atlantic Ocean at Cape Fear, near the southern extremity of the State. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 426.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1915 and 1938. Existing projects. The authorized project provides for a channel 25 feet deep and 200 feet wide from Wilmington to a turning basin 400 feet wide and 550 feet long at Navassa (2.9 miles); a channel 12 feet deep and 140 feet wide from Navassa to mileboard 30 at Acme, with five channel cutoffs, 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide to eliminate sharp bends; a channel 8 feet deep from mileboard 30 to Fayetteville by constructing three locks and dams and by dredging river shoals; and recreational facilities at the locks and dams. Total length of the project channels is 113.9 miles. The project was authorized by River and Harbor Acts of June 25, 1910; June 26, 1934; August 30, 1935; August 26, 1937; October 27, 1965; and Section 4, Flood Control Act of 1944. For further details see Annual Reports for 1962 and 1970. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are twelve waterfront facilities on the river, with a total frontage of 1,190 feet. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Periodic inspections and evaluation of three locks and dams cost $48,892. Repairs to lock gate sealing systems cost $203,024. During intermittent periods the U. S. snagboat Snell conducted clearing and snagging operations at a cost of $120,434. Preparation of a hydropower reconnaissance study cost $14,771. Engineering and design for pipeline dredging cost $5,668. Condition and operation studies cost $44,878. Operation and maintenance of three locks and dams cost $214,343. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in June 1970. Total costs of existing project to September 30, 1981, were $14,047,514 of which $3,610,454 (including $1,226,385 public works) was for new work and $10,437,060 for maintenance. 4. CHANNEL FROM BACK SOUND TO LOOKOUT BIGHT, N. C. Location. The project is located on the coast of North Carolina, 8 miles east of Beaufort Inlet. {See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 420.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 100 feet wide and 7 feet deep from Back Sound, through Shackleford Banks to Lookout Bight. The project was authorized by River and Harbor Acts of August 26, 1937, and March 2, 1945. For details see Annual Report for 1959. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Not required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Cost in connection with prior year dredging was $3,456. Condition and operation studies cost $7,177. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in May 1965. 5. LOCKWOODS FOLLY RIVER, N. C. Location The project is located on the south coast of North Carolina about 12 miles west of Cape Fear River. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1236 and Geological Survey Map of North Carolina.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 100 feet wide and 6 feet deep at low water from the 63 REPORT 'TOHF E (CHIEF OF' ENGINlEERS, U.S .A RMY 19M1 ocean to the bridge at Supply 12.5 miles above, to be obtained by dredging through oyster rocks and mudflats. The completed river portion of the project above the waterway was reclassified to the active category in 1971. Lunar tidal ranges in Lockwoods Folly River are 4.5 feet at the inlet and 2 feet at the head of navigation at Supply. The existing project was authorized by the 1890 River and Harbor Act. (See Annual Report for 1887, page 1099.) A modification to enlarge the channel from 6 to 12 feet deep and from 100 to 150 feet wide across the ocean bar for distance of 4,700 feet was approved by the Chief of Engineers on June 3, 1980, under Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act. The estimated Federal construction cost is $250,000 (1981). Local cooperation. For the new modification local interest must: (a) pay, contribute in kind, or repay with interest, onehalf of the first costs of construction allocated to recreational boating, an amount presently estimated at $63,000; (b) hold and save the United States free from damages resulting from changes in groundwater levels, saltwater intrusion, or wave action due to the construction works, except damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractor; (c) provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way necessary for the construction and subsequent maintenance of the project and for aids to navigation upon the request of the Chief of Engineers and (d) provide depths in berthing areas commensurate with the project depths, and provide service facilities. Terminal facilities. Thirty-one piers and wharves on the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway at Holden Beach, about 1.25 miles west of Lockwoods Folly Inlet, with a total frontage of about 1,980 feet available. At Dixons Landing, about 2 miles upstream of the inlet, there are five wharves with a total frontage of 240 feet. Numerous natural landings are used for loading and unloading small boats. Berthing space in the vicinity of Lockwoods Folly Inlet totals about 2,220 feet. Facilities are considered adequate for present commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Preconstruction planning for the latest modification cost $1,471. Detailed project report cost $1,680. Maintenance: Between June 27, 1981 and August 11, 1981, the U.S. hopper dredge Currituck removed 24,320 cubic yards from shoals in the inlet at a cost of $53,599. During intermittent periods the U. S. sidecasting dredge Merritt removed 52,990 cubic yards from shoals in the inlet at a cost of $103,592. Between July 22 and 27, 1981, the U. S. snagboat Snell removed wreckage at a cost of $8,250. Between October 1 and November 14, 1980, the contract dredge Marion removed 2,966 cubic yards from shoals in the river channel at a cost of $13,390. Condition and operation studies cost $17,576. Condition at end of fiscal year. The active portion of the project was completed in June 1965 except for the latest modification. 6. MANTEO (SHALLOWBAG) BAY, N. C. Location, The project is located on the northeastern side of Roanoke Island, North Carolina. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1229.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 14 feet deep and 400 feet wide from the Atlantic Ocean through Oregon Inlet with connecting 12-foot channels, 100 feet wide, to Pamlico Sound, Manteo, and Wanchese; and a channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide connecting the Manteo-Oregon Inlet Channel with Roanoke Sound. Length of channels is 25.4 miles. A newly authorized modification provides for stabilization of Oregon Inlet with a dual rubble-mound jetty system, including means for sand transfer to the downdrift beach and bottom protection for the highway bridge over Oregon Inlet; a channel, 20 feet deep and 400 feet wide, through the ocean bar at Oregon Inlet; a channel, 14 feet deep and 120 feet wide, from the gorge in Oregon Inlet to and through Roanoke Sound to and including a 15-acre basin of the same depth at Wanchese. The estimated Federal cost for the modification is $101,000,000 (1981). The project was authorized by River and Harbor Acts of June 25, 1910; October 17, 1940; May 17, 1950; and December 31, 1970; and under Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act. Local cooperation. For the new modification, local interests must: (a) provide all lands, easements, and rights-of-way for construction and subsequent maintenance of the project, including suitable areas required for initial and subsequent disposal of spoil and also necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads, and embankments therefor, or the cost of such retaining works; (b) hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works and subsequent maintenance; (c) continue to provide and maintain adequate terminal and transfer facilities, open to all on equal terms, in accordance with plans approved by the Chief of Engineers; (d) provide and maintain necessary mooring and berthing facilities in any enlarged basin, open to all on equal terms, in accordance with plans approved by the Chief of Engineers; (e) provide and maintain depths in berthing areas and local access channels serving the terminals commensurate with depths provided in the related projects areas; (f) provide and maintain necessary bottom protection along the bridge over Oregon Inlet or the cost of such protection works; (g) accomplish such alterations as required in sewer, water supply, drainage, electrical powerlines, telephone lines, or other utility facilties as well as their maintenance; (h) establish a competent and properly constituted public body empowered to regulate the use, growth, and free development of the harbor facilities, with the understanding that said facilities will be open to all on equal terms; (i) and establish regulations prohibiting the discharge of untreated sewage, garbage, and other pollutants in the water of the harbor by the users thereof, which regulations shall be in accordance with applicable laws or regulations of Federal, State, and local authorities responsible for pollution prevention and control. Reasonable assurances have been received. The State of N. C. has constructed the Wanchese Harbor portion and was reimbursed under Sec. 215, PL 90-483. Terminal facilities. The project is served by 33 waterfront facilities with a total frontage of 3,320 feet. Additional wharves and facilities will be provided with the enlarged basin at Wanchese. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Environmental and archeological studies cost $34,125. Engineering and design cost $1,491,233. Real estate support cost $195. Communications costs were $17,460. Maintenance: During intermittent periods the U. S. sidecasting dredge Schweizer removed 550,250 cubic yards from shoals in Oregon Inlet at a cost of $838,134. Between April 27 and June 25, 1981, the U. S. sidecasting dredge Merritt removed 115,605 cubic yards from shoals in Oregon Inlet at a cost of $151,699. Between November 3 and December 30, 1980, the U. S. hopper dredge Currituck removed 27,225 cubic yards from shoals in Oregon Inlet at a cost of $89,033. Between December 22, 1980 and March 13, 1981, the contract dredge Richmond removed 177,848 cubic yards from shoals in Old House Channel at a cost of $710,152. During intermittent periods the U.S. snagboat 64 Snell repaired docks and moorings at a cost of $12,879. Design of the berth for the Schweizer cost $279. Oregon Inlet model study cost $5,885. Condition and operation studies cost $39,724. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is complete except for the latest modification. (For further details, see Annual Report of 1962.) 7. MOREHEAD CITY HARBOR, N. C. Location. The project is located on the northern shore of Bogue Sound, adjacent to Beaufort Inlet. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 420.) Previous project. For details see page 470 of Annual Report for 1935. Existing project. The authorized project provides for deepening of the channel, from the 42-foot-depth contour in the Atlantic Ocean through the ocean bar to the gorge in Beaufort Inlet, to 42 feet over a bottom width of 450 feet, thence to a depth of 40 feet in the east leg of the turning basin including the 1,200 foot diameter turning area, with widths of 600 feet in the cutoff channel, and 400 feet wide to the turning basin and connecting shallow-draft channels. Project deepening was completed on 2 August 1978. Jetties at Beaufort Inlet were reclassified to the "active" category on March 8, 1972. The estimated Federal cost is $45,800,000 (1981) for the jetties. In general the project as it now exists was authorized by the 1958 River and Harbor Act (S.D. 54, 84th Cong., 1st sess.) and the River and Harbor Act of December 31, 1970. For further details see Annual Report for 1962. Local cooperation. Fully complied with except for construction of the jetties which requires that all lands needed for construction be provided without cost to the United States. Terminal facilities. Twenty-six waterfront facilities serve the port, with a total frontage of 1,250 feet. Marine terminals provide 5,300 feet of berthing space, with a depth alongside of 35 feet, and facilities for transfer of cargoes between rail and water carriers. Improvements to facilities were completed in 1969. For further details see Port Series No. 12, revised 1971, Corps of Engineers. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Between February 1 and April 6, 1981, the contract dredge Dodge Island removed 824,052 cubic yards from shoals in the ocean bar at a cost of $2,331,344. Between July 19, 1981 and September 30, 1981, the contract dredge Hampton Roads removed 589,566 cubic yards from shoals in the inner harbor at a cost of $866,580. Monitoring of Beaufort Inlet cost $3,089. Monitoring of Bogue Banks and Shackleford Banks cost $20,342. Maintenance of tide gages cost $4,418. Condition and operation studies cost $109,321. Contributed funds of $312,330 were expended for diking and $17,204 for dredging at the State Ports Authority. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project is complete except for the jetties. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1962.) Total cost of the existing project to September 30, 1981 was $28,673,423 of which $6,501,569 was for new work (including $553,477 public works funds) and $22,171,854 for maintenance, including $417,887 contributed funds. 8. OCRACOKE INLET, N. C. Location. The inlet connects Pamlico Sound with the Atlantic Ocean, about 30 miles southwest of Cape Hatteras and 43 miles northeast of Cape Lookout. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 1232.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel across the ocean bar 18 feet deep and 400 feet wide, and construction of a jetty extending from Ocracoke Island to the Atlantic Ocean. Construction of the jetty has been deferred for restudy. The project was authorized by the River and Harbor Act of July 14, 1960. For further details, see Annual Report for 1962. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and operation studies cost $25,457. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was completed in August 1971. 9. SILVER LAKE HARBOR, N. C. Location. The project is located at the southwest end of Ocracoke Island, a portion of the Outer Banks on the southeast coast of North Carolina, separating Pamlico Sound from the Atlantic Ocean. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 1232.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for basin depths of 12 feet in Silver Lake Harbor; an entrance channel 12 feet deep and 60 feet wide, from the basin to Teaches Hole Channel; a channel, 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide, from the entrance channel through Big Foot Slough Bar to the 12-foot contour in Pamlico Sound; a channel, 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide, from the entrance channel through Teaches Hole Channel to the gorge in Ocracoke Inlet; a channel, 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide, across Bluff Shoal; and for rubble-mound training walls on the north and south sides of the entrance channel, 300 feet and 400 feet long, respectively. Mean tidal ranges are 1.9 feet in the throat of Ocracoke Inlet and 1 foot at Ocracoke. Variations in the water surface of Pamlico Sound are generally due to winds and seldom exceed 1 or 2 feet above or below mean stage. Severe storms have raised the water surface as much as 7 feet above normal water level at Ocracoke. (See Table 6-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Twelve waterfront facilities serve the harbor. These facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Between October 1 and November 30, 1980, the contract dredge Buxton removed 29,534 cubic yards from shoals in Big Foot Slough channel at a cost of $71,652. Between December 2, 1980 and January 16, 1981, the contract dredge Marion removed 89,917 cubic yards from shoals in Big Foot Slough Channel at a cost of $286,443. Condition and operation studies cost $6,861. Contributed funds of $75,000 were expended for diking. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed July 28, 1970. (For further details see Annual Report for 1961.) 10. WATERWAY CONNECTING PAMLICO SOUND AND BEAUFORT HARBOR, N. C. Location. The project is located in Core Sound, west of the outer banks of eastern North Carolina (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 420 and 1233.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a through channel to Core Sound 7 feet deep and 75 feet wide from Pamlico Sound to Beaufort Harbor; an alternative route of K 11.\1IN(;'I'O'\, \, ('., U 4'1'I{I( i the same dimensions through Back Sound by way of channels at the east and west ends of Harkers Island; a channel 7 feet deep and 70 feet wide from the through channel to the local harbor at Cedar Island, including the authorized passage and future maintenance of a channel through the existing private basin, and an access channel 6 feet deep, 50 feet wide and about 400 feet long to a basin the same depth, 60 feet by 100 feet; a channel 7 feet deep and 75 feet wide from the through channel to Atlantic; a channel 7 feet deep and 75 feet wide, with a basin 200 feet by 500 feet, the same depth, at Sealevel; a channel 7 feet deep and 75 feet wide, with basin 150 feet by 130 feet, the same depth, at Davis; a channel 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide with a basin 100 feet by 600 feet, the same depth, at Marshallberg; an entrance channel 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide, from Back Sound to harbor of refuge 120 feet by 250 feet, the same depth in Brooks Creek at the west end of Harkers Island; and a channel 7 feet deep and 70 feet wide, from the existing side channel at Atlantic, N.C., to the mouth of Little Port Brook; thence 7 feet deep and 50 feet wide, along the Brook to a basin 600 feet long, 180 feet wide, and 7 feet deep, with a breakwater, beginning at a point between the mouth of Little Port Brook and White Point, running along the channel approximately 2,000 feet. The project is complete except for 7-foot modification to Davis, N. C. Plane of reference is mean low water. The length of the authorized channels is about 50.6 miles (See Table 6-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date for completed portion. For the uncompleted Davis modification, local interests must: (a) Provide, without cost to the United States and in accordance with the provisions of acquisition contained in PL 91-646, Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Act of 1970, all lands and easements, and rights-ofway required for construction and subsequent maintenance of the project, and for construction and maintenance of aids to navigation upon the request of the Chief of Engineers, including suitable areas determined by the Chief of Engineers to be required in the general public interest for initial and subsequent disposal of dredged material; and also necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads, and embankments therefor, or the cost of such retaining works; (b) hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works and maintenance of the project; (c) provide and maintain, without cost to the United States, depths in berthing areas and local access channels commensurate with depths provided in related project areas; (d) provide and maintain, at local expense, an adequate public wharf, with terminal and transfer facilities, open to all on equal terms, in accordance with plans approved by the Chief of Engineers; (e) establish regulations prohibiting the discharge of pollutants into the waters of the channel and basin by the users thereof, which regulations shall be in accordance with applicable laws or regulations of Federal, State, and local authorities responsible for pollution prevention and control; (f) assume full responsibility for all project costs in excess of the Federal cost limitation of $1,000,000. Terminal facilities. Sixteen small wharves serve the waterway. Additional facilities are needed along Core Sound. Operations and results during fiscal year. Project condition surveys cost $12,346. Remaining project funds were transferred. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in September 1972 except for the modification to Davis, N. C. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1961.) 11. WILMINGTON HARBOR, N. C. Location. The project is located on the Cape Fear River, on southeast coast of North Carolina, between the Atlantic Ocean and Wilmington, North Carolina. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 426.) Previous projects. For details, see page 1804 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 533 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 40 feet deep and 500 feet wide from the Atlantic Ocean through the ocean bar and entrance channels to Southport, thence 38 feet deep and 400 feet wide to the upper end of the anchorage basin (foot of Castle Street) at Wilmington, thence 32 feet deep and 400 feet wide, to Hilton Bridge over Northeast (Cape Fear) River; a 38-foot-deep anchorage basin at Wilmington; a 32-foot-deep turning basin opposite the principal terminals; a channel 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide, about 3 miles long, in Cape Fear River; and a channel 25 feet deep and 200 feet wide from Hilton Bridge over Northeast (Cape Fear) River to a point 1.66 miles above, including a turning basin of the same depth, 700 feet wide and 500 feet long, at a point 1.25 miles above the bridge. The project was authorized by River and Harbor Acts of July 3, 1930; March 2, 1945; May 17, 1950; October 23, 1962; and March 10, 1964; under Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act. (For further details of authorization, see 1962 Annual Report.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Forty-three principal wharves, piers, and docks at port of Wilmington, with a berthing space of about 20,000 linear feet serve the harbor. These facilities handle general cargo and petroleum products. For further details, see Port Series No. 12, part 2, revised 1971, Corps of Engineers. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: During intermittent periods the U. S. snagboat Snell repaired and replaced survey and dredging ranges at a cost of $103,050. Between October 1 and November 22, 1980, the contract dredge Hampton Roads removed 850,629 cubic yards from shoals in the anchorage basin at a cost of $870,003. Between December 29, 1980 and March 11, 1981, the contract dredge Atchafalaya removed 393,495 cubic yards from shoals in the ocean bar at a cost of $905,227. Between August 3 and September 28, 1981, the contract dredge Pullen removed 439,935 cubic yards from shoals in the anchorage basin at a cost of $585,162. Between September 28 and 30, 1981, the contract dredge Clarendon removed 15,317 cubic yards from shoals in the 25-foot project at a cost of $119,989. Between March 5 and 9, 1981, the contract dredge Hampton Roads removed 40,198 cubic yards from shoals in the river channel at a cost of $62,277. Costs in connection with prior year dredging were $322. Ocean dumping bioassay study cost $3. Adjustment to costs for construction of Eagle Island dikes caused a decrease of -$2,428. Mosquito control on Eagle Island cost $16,881. Installation of tide gages cost $988. Condition and operation studies cost $153,375. Contributed funds of $109,970 were expended for diking. Adjustment in prior year dredging cost for the State Ports Authority caused a decrease in contributed funds cost of -$1,847. A refund to the State of North Carolina was made for $1,847. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project completed July 1973. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1962.) Total cost of theexisting project to September 30, 1981, was $49,217,564 of which $14,089,612 was for new work and $35,127,952 was for maintenance, including $1,780,758 contributed funds. 66 iti:1'oit"i' 01 iii t: ('uit:u"' (1i' i;\(:iti(":i:itti, t . ti. " itM'i 1!)K1 ,'ILMINGTON, N. C., I)IST'I'RI('I' 12. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS (See Table 6-C.) 13. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Table 6-D.) 14. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (preauthorization. (See Table 6-E.) Beach Erosion Control 15. FORT FISHER AND VICINITY, N. C. Location. The project is located in New Hanover County about 20 miles south of Wilmington, North Carolina, on the peninsula which separates the lower Cape Fear River from the Atlantic Ocean. (See U. S. Geological Survey quadrangle sheet for Kure Beach, N. C.) Existing Project. The project involves construction of a stone revetment along the seaward face of the eroding upland bluff fronting the Fort Fisher Historic Site. The total length of the revetment is 3,200 feet. The revetment structure will be comprised of natural stone units. The crest of the revetment will be rimmed with a safety zone consisting of a pedestrian path, rails, and appropriate landscaping to prevent access to the sloping face of the structure. Three overlook, gazebo-type platforms will permit visitors to view the beach below the revetment, and three stairways integrated in the face of the structure will allow controlled access to the beach. Estimated Federal cost of construction is $5,200,000 (1981). The project was authorized under Section 201 of Public Law 89-298 on November 22, 1976. Local cooperation. The State of North Carolina is the project sponsor and prior to commencement of construction would: a. Provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way, including suitable beach fill material borrow areas, as determined by the Chief of Engineers, necessary for the construction of the project. b. Provide a cash contribution for the shore protection project equal to the appropriate percentage of the final construction cost exclusive of lands, easements, rights-of-way, and alterations, the percentage to be in accordance with existing law, which contribution is presently estimated at $2,200,000, or 30 percent of project first costs. c. Enter into a written agreement satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army concerning accomplishment of the above preconstruction requirements and that the State will: (1) Hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works. (2) Maintain the revetment structure, walkway, overlooks, and stairways after completion of construction in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army. (3) Provide without cost to the United States appropriate access and facilities, including parking and sanitation, necessary for realization of the public benefits upon which Federal participation is based, and administer and maintain the site for continued public use during the life of the project. (4) Control water pollution to the extent necessary to safeguard the health of bathers. (5) Adopt appropriate ordinances or provide other means to insure preservation of the beach areas and the dunes. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Advance engineering and design cost $155,712. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is in the preconstruction planning stage with completion scheduled for Fiscal Year 1982. 16. OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 6-F.) Flood Control 17. ADKIN BRANCH, LENOIR COUNTY, N. C. Location. Adkin Branch is a tributary of the Neuse River and is located in central Lenoir County and the Coastal Plain Region of North Carolina. The stream flows in a southeasterly direction for about 6 miles to the Neuse River. (See Geological Survey quadrangle sheet, Kinston, N. C.). Existing project. Provides for deepening and widening the channel to a 30-foot bottom width from the mouth of Adkin Branch to Lincoln Street, 0.5 mile; thence 26 feet wide to Seaboard Coast Line RR Crossing, 1.8 miles; thence 21 feet wide to Highland Drive, 0.4 mile; thence 17 feet wide to Queen Street, 0.5 mile; constructing drop structures at stations 52 + 00, 110 + 62, 143 + 08, and 165 + 78; modifying the existing bridges at Caswell Street, Gordon Street and Washington Avenue to 30-foot clear spans; and installing safety fence around structures, 0.3 mile. Total length of project is 3.2 miles. Project was approved by the Chief of Engineers, April 1, 1971, under Section 205, 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended and was deauthorized September 8, 1981, due to the inability of local interest to provide the terms of local cooperation. Local cooperation. Local interests must provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, utility relocations and alterations, and highway or highway-bridge construction and alterations necessary for project construction; hold the United States free from damages, and adjust claims concerning water rights; maintain and operate the project after its completion; control land use in the flood plain to prevent development which would be subject to flood damage; contribute 16.75 percent of construction costs, now estimated at $288,000; and prevent future encroachment. Formal request has been made. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Detailed engineering and design cost $3,019. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project has been deauthorized. 18. BLACK RIVER, HARNETT COUNTY, N. C. Location. The river rises near Angier in Harnett County, N. C., and flows in a southerly direction about 25 miles to its confluence with South River. (See Army Map Service quadrangle sheet 5254, Fayetteville, N. C.) Existing project. The project provides for 5.5 miles of channel excavation on Black River, beginning at a point 8,000 feet below County Road 1780, with a 35-foot bottom width to the Durham and Southern Railroad. The project was authorized by the Chief of Engineers on February 9, 1968, under Section 205, 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. 67 Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Project monitoring cost $3,784. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was completed in December 1979. 19. CAPE FEAR RIVER BASIN, N. C. Location. Work covered by this project consists of a series of dams and reservoirs on tributaries of the Cape Fear River in North Carolina within a radius of 100 miles from Raleigh, North Carolina. (See Geological Survey Map of North Carolina.) Existing project. Public Law 88-253, approved December 30, 1963, authorized three principal dams and reservoirs and a series of smaller reservoirs on tributaries of the Cape Fear River in accordance with the comprehensive plans in House Document 508, 87th Congress, 2d session. The act also provides that the appropriate agencies of the Departments of the Army and Agriculture shall conduct joint investigations and surveys and prepare a report on the upper tributaries of the Cape Fear River in the interest of watershed protection and flood prevention, and the conservation, development, utilization, and disposal of water. The report is to be prepared and submitted in compliance with provisions of Public Law 87-639. A list of the dams and reservoirs included in the comprehensive plan follows. (See Table 6-G on Dams and Reservoirs). Estimates of cost as given are based on 1960 price levels, except the ones for B. Everett Jordan Dam and Lake, and Randleman Lake, which were revised in 1981, and Howards Mills Lake in 1980. These three projects have been authorized for construction in accordance with the above authorization. Howards Mill Lake was reclassified to the "deferred" category in October 1980 due to the current lack of economic justification. The joint study, accomplished by the Departments of the Army and Agriculture was unfavorable and has been submitted to Congress. Local cooperation. Requirements are given in the individual project reports. 19A. B. EVERETT JORDAN DAM AND LAKE, N. C. (FORMERLY NEW HOPE LAKE, N. C.) Location. The project is located on the Haw River, N. C., 4.3 miles above its mouth, and 2.5 miles north of Moncure, N. C. Existing project. The project provides for an earth dam 1,330 feet long with a maximum height of 112 feet above the streambed, an uncontrolled, unpaved chute spillway, and a controlled 19-foot-diameter outlet structure. Some saddle dikes are required beyond the spillway. The reservoir will have a gross storage capacity of 778,000 acre-feet, of which 543,000 acre-feet will be for flood control and a conservation pool of 235,000 acre-feet for water-quality control, water supply, and sedimentation. The reservoir will be operated as a unit of a coordinated system for control of floods in the Cape Fear River Basin and for water supply, water-quality control, and other purposes. Estimated cost for new work is $124,000,000 (1981), consisting of $66,376,400 for construction, and $57,623,600 for lands and damages, including highway, railroad, and utility relocations. The existing project was authorized by Public Law 88-253 approved December 30, 1963 (H.D. 508, 87th Cong., 2d sess.) Local cooperation. Local interests must protect downstream channels from encroachments and obstructions which would adversely affect operation of the project; reimburse the Federal Government for all costs allocated to municipal and industrial water supply, presently estimated at $3,500,000 and bear all annual costs for operation, maintenance, and major replacements allocated to municipal and industrial water supply, an amount presently estimated at $33,000 annually. Assurances that these obligations for water storage would be assumed have been received from the Department of Natural and Economic Resources, State of North Carolina. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Real estate operations cost $75,300. Relocation of N. C. Roads 1715 and 1941 was completed at a cost of $397,100. Relocation of N. C. Roads 751 and 1731 continued at a cost of $329,000. Relocation of N. C. Roads 1726 and 1110 continued at a cost of $68,500. Relocation of N. C. Road 1906 continued at a cost of $1,218,000. Repairs to NSRR cost $145,500. Dam toe modification cost $741,900. Archeological excavations continued at a cost of $144,700. Status of plans and specs: All relocations, 100 percent; Chatham County recreation area, 85%; Group I launch ramps 100%; and project O&M facilities, 100 percent. Total Federal expenditures were $3,849,535. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance on completed features cost $370,046. Condition at end of fiscal year. All road relocations except two are complete. Cemetery, telephone and colonial pipeline relocations are complete. Reservoir clearing and the dam are also complete. 19B. RANDLEMAN LAKE, N. C. Location. The project is located on Deep River, N. C., about 15 miles south of Greensboro and about 2 miles upstream from the town of Randleman. The damsite and about two-thirds of the reservoir would lie in Randolph County. The upper onethird of the reservoir would lie in Guilford County. Existing project. The authorized project provides for construction of an earth dam 2,400 feet long with a maximum height of 110 feet above the streambed to create a reservoir with gross storage of 108,000 acre-feet, consisting of 46,000 acre-feet for flood control and a conservation pool of 62,000 acre-feet for water supply, water-quality control and sedimentation. Randleman Lake is the second project of the comprehensive plan of development for the Cape Fear River Basin, providing reservoir storage for flood control, water supply, and recreation. Estimated cost of new work is $109,000,000 (1981), consisting of $58,329,000 for construction and $50,671,000 for lands and damages, including relocations. The existing project was authorized by the 1968 Flood Control Act (H.D. 343, 90th Cong., 2d sess.). Local cooperation. Local interests must: (1) In accordance with the Federal Water Project Recreation Act (P.L. 89-72): (a) Administer project land and water areas for recreation and fish and wildlife and to assure access to such development to all on equal terms; (b) pay, contribute in kind, or repay (which may be through user fees) with interest, one-half of the separable first cost allocated to recreation presently estimated at $15,100,000; and (c) bear all the costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of recreation facilities, presently estimated at $464,000 annually: (2) In accordance with the Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, assure payment to the United States of all costs allocated to water supply, presently estimated at $43,100,000 for construction and $333,000 annually for operation, maintenance, and major replacement; (3) Hold and save the United States free from damages due to water-rights claims resulting from construction and operation of the project; (4) Prevent encroachment on downstream channels to the extent 68 1tI E ()1t 1 OF 1 1IF: c 111FF ( F F;N ;1\F:F:Rti, t . . 1RMY 19M1 needed to provide effective reservoir operation; and (5) Exercise to the full extent of their legal capability control against removal of stream-flow made available for preservation of downstream fishery habitat. These assurances are subject to the provision that Federal participation in measures required to safeguard the quality of water in Randleman Reservoir shall not be provided as a substitute for the responsibility of local interests to provide adequate treatment in accordance with water quality standards established pursuant to the Water Quality Amendments of 1972 (P.L. 92-500). Reasonable assurances that the requirements will be fulfilled have been received. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Advance engineering and design cost $199,508. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is in the preconstruction planning stage with completion scheduled for Fiscal Year 1982. 20. CAROLINA BEACH AND VICINITY, N. C. Location. The project is in New Hanover County, about 15 miles southeast of Wilmington, N. C., on the peninsula which separates lower Cape Fear River from the Atlantic Ocean. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Map 834.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for construction of a dune with a base generally bordering at or near the building line, with a crown width of 25 feet at an elevation of 15 feet above mean low water, together with integral construction of a beach berm with a crown width of 50 feet at elevation 12, extending about 25,800 feet from the northern limits of Carolina Beach to the southern limits of Kure Beach; initial deposition of sufficient material north of Carolina Beach to serve as a feeder beach; and Federal participation in the cost of beach nourishment for a period not to exceed 10 years from the year of completion of initial placement. The area south of Carolina Beach was reclassified to the inactive category, February 1975. Approved estimated Federal cost for new work is $11,600,000 (1981). The project was authorized by the 1962 Flood Control Act (H.D. 418, 87th Cong., 2d sess.). Local cooperation. Local interests must: (a) Provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way for construction; (b) make required relocations and alterations of streets, utilities, or structures; (c) contribute 37.9 percent of the total first cost, with credit allowed for (a) and (b); (d) hold the United States free from damages; (e) maintain all works after completion; (f) maintain continued public ownership of the shore; (g) adopt and enforce appropriate ordinances to provide for preservation of improvement and its protective vegetation; (h) control water pollution to extent necessary to safeguard health of bathers; and (i) at least annually inform interests affected that project will not provide any substantial protection from ocean surges higher in elevation than that of Hurricane Hazel, October 15, 1954. Requirements have been fulfilled to date for the town of Carolina Beach portion of the project only. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design for construction cost $236,332. Condition at end of fiscal year. A contract for project restoration was awarded September 30, 1981, with completion scheduled for 1982. 21. DEEP CREEK, EDGECOMBE COUNTY, N. C. Location The stream rises in Halifax County and flows southerly to its confluence with Fishing Creek, about 0.5 mile upstream of the Fishing Creek and Tar River confluence, which is about 8.0 miles above Tarboro. All of the project is in Edgecombe County, N. C. (See U.S. Geological Survey quadrangle sheets, Parmele and Tarboro, N. C.) Existing project. The project provides for channel improvement and dike construction in the Deep Creek basin, consisting of the construction of a dike and drainage appurtenances on the north, west, and south sides of the town of Speed, for a distance of about 7,400 feet, to a maximum height of 9.5 feet, with a 10-foot-top-width; relocation and channel excavation of 3,100 feet of Knight Swamp along the northern dike segment and 1,800 feet of Longs Branch along the southern dike segment, to 20-feet and 15-foot-bottom widths, respectively, and enlarging 3,200 feet of Deep Creek to a 65-foot maximum bottom width along the western dike segment, utilizing excavated material for dike fill; and channel excavation of an additional 500 feet of both Knight Swamp and Longs Branch upstream of the dike to bottom widths of 10 feet; at an estimated Federal construction cost of $448,000 (1981). The project was approved by the Chief of Engineers on February 18, 1977, under Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local cooperation. Local interests must provide, without cost to the United States, all lands, easements, rights-of-way utility relocations or alterations, and road and bridge construction and alterations necessary for project provision (the acquisition of all lands or interest in lands necessary for the project shall be accomplished in accordance with provisions of P.L. 91-646, Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970); hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works when not caused by the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractor; maintain and operate the project after completion, without cost to the United States, in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army; prescribe and enforce regulations to prevent obstruction or encroachment on channels which would reduce their flood carrying capacity or hinder maintenance and operation and regulate land use in the 100-year improved flood plain within the diked area to prevent any development which would be subject to flood damage in accordance with acceptable flood plain management practices; bear all project costs in excess of $2 million; and notify interests affected, at least annually, that the improvements will provide protection against the 100-year flood within the diked area and about the 5-year flood along the cleared and snagged reach, but complete flood protection is not provided. Formal assurances have been requested. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Detailed engineering and design cost $3,578. Condition at end of fiscal year. Preconstruction planning is underway and construction is scheduled for FY 1982. Upon receipt of local cooperation requirements, final revisions will be made to the plans and specs. 22. JOYCE CREEK, CAMDEN COUNTY, N. C. Location. Joyce Creek rises in the northeastern part of Camden County, N. C., and flows generally southward for about 10 miles to Turners Cut near South Mills, North Carolina. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1227 and Army Map Service quadrangle sheet, South Mills, N. C.) Existing project. The project provides for excavating a channel 40 feet wide, from the confluence with Turners Cut to County Road 1235 ,3.2 miles; thence a channel, 30 feet wide, to the uppermost crossing of SR 1224, 0.8 miles; thence a 20 foot bot- 69 % II1I\(IO\. \. I)I5'IItI(I' tom width channel to the confluence with Mill Run and Cypress Run, 1.7 miles; thence on Cypress Run, a channel, 10 feet wide, to County Road 1233, 1.6 miles; and on Mill Run, a 10-foot-wide channel from confluence with Joyce Creek to County Road 1232, 2.2 miles; a total of 9.5 miles. Estimated Federal construction cost is $483,000 (1981). The project was approved by the Chief of Engineers on March 29, 1967, under Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local cooperation. Local interests must provide all lands, easements, rights-of-way, utility relocations and alterations, and highway or highway-bridge construction and alterations necessary for construction; hold the United States free from damages; maintain and operate the project after completion; prevent future encroachment; provide a cash contribution of 21.5 percent of construction costs, now estimated at $123,000; and accomplish associated drainage works necessary to realize the benefits from the Federal improvement. Camden County is project sponsor based on favorable referendum in 1974. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Detailed engineering and design cost $54,248. Project reanalysis cost $9,706. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project reanalysis is complete. EIS is underway and plans and specs are to be revised. Construction is scheduled for FY 1982. 23. LEESVILLE, VA., ROANOKE RIVER, SEC. 32, DEMO. PROJECT Location. The project is located on the Roanoke (Staunton) River in southwest Virginia near the Town of Leesville in Campbell and Pittsylvania counties. (See USGS quadrangle sheet, Leesville, Va.) Existing project. The project provides for a total of about 2,200 linear feet of streambank protection on two separate sites along a 3-mile segment of the river between Leesville Dam and the town of Leesville. Three methods of erosion control were used, they were: stone rubble with vegetation, rubber tire mattress and rock windrow. The project was funded for construction by the Chief of Engineers in February 1978, under Section 32, P.L. 93-251. Local cooperation. Local interests must provide all lands, easements and rights-of-way; hold and save the United States free from damages; and maintain and operate project after completion. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Construction cost $305,582. Monitoring of Leesville and Little Rockfish Creek cost $10,842. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was completed in March 1981. The project is functioning as designed. 24. NEUSE RIVER BASIN, N. C. Location. Works covered by this project consist of a series of dams and reservoirs in the Neuse River Basin in North Carolina within a radius of 50 miles from Raleigh, North Carolina. (See Geological Survey Map of North Carolina.) Existing project. The Flood Control Act of 1965 authorized construction of the Falls project as the key project in the recommended general plan of development of the Neuse River Basin. The plan will serve as a guide for immediate and future development of the basin's water resources as set forth in House Document 175, 89th Congress, 1st Session. A list of projects included in the general plan of development follows. (See Table 6-G on Dams and Reservoirs.) Estimated costs as given are based on 1963 price levels, except for Falls Lake which was revised in 1981. 24A. FALLS LAKE, N. C. Location. The project is on the Neuse River about 10 miles north of the city of Raleigh, North Carolina. Existing project. The authorized project provides for an earth dam 1,900 feet long with a maximum height of 92 feet above streambed. The dam will have a 30-foot top width. An uncontrolled chute spillway, 100-feet wide, will be located in the east abutment. The reservoir will have a gross storage capacity of 397,000 acre-feet, of which 243,000 acre-feet will be for flood control, 45,000 acre-feet for water supply for the city of Raleigh, 71,000 acre-feet for water-quality control, and 38,000 acre-feet for sediment storage. The reservoir will be operated as the initial unit of a coordinated system for control of floods in the Neuse River Basin for water supply, water quality control, recreation, and other purposes. Project items may be modified in detailed planning. Estimated cost of new work is $153,000,000, consisting of $66,198,000 for construction and $86,802,000 for lands and damages, including highway, railroad, and utility relocations. The project was authorized by the 1965 Flood Control Act (H.D. 175, 89th Cong., 1st sess.). Local cooperation. Local interests must prevent encroachment on downstream channels that would interfere with the operation of the reservoir; pay the United States in accordance with the Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, the entire amount of construction cost allocated to water supply, presently estimated at $12,300,000 and entire amount of operation, maintenance, and replacement costs allocated to water supply, presently estimated at $79,000 annually, the final amounts to be determined after actual costs are known; administer project land and water areas for recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement; pay, contribute in kind, or repay (which may be through user fees), with interest, one-half of the separable cost of the project allocated to recreation and one-fourth of the separable cost allocated to fish and wildlife enhancement, the amount involved currently being estimated at $21,700,000, and, bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of recreation and fish and wildlife lands and facilities, the amount involved currently being estimated at $1,091,000 on an average annual basis. Formal assurances have been received. The N. C. Department of Natural and Economic Resources has been authorized by an act of legislation to assure payment of all non- Federal costs allocable to water supply in all Federal projects as required by law. The State will require repayment of water supply costs, by the users. A contract between the city of Raleigh and the United States for water-supply storage space was approved by the Secretary of the Army on September 11, 1972. A contract agreement for cost sharing of recreational lands and facilities in accordance with P.L. 89-72 was approved by the Secretary of the Army on September 11, 1972. A contract agreement in accordance with Section 221 of P.L. 91-611 was executed on October 10, 1972. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Land acquisition continued at a cost of $5,600,800. Relocation of US-15 and I-85 was initiated at a cost of $11,800. Relocation of N. C. Roads 1811, 1800 and 1637 was completed at a cost of $176,600. Relocation of N. C. Roads 1801/1902 and 1901 was completed at a cost of $109,500. Relocation of N. C. Roads 1901, 1726 and 1721 was completed at a cost of $1,564,800. Relocation of N.C. Roads 2002 and 1005 was completed at a cost of $388,500. Relocation of N. C. Roads 2010 and 2002 was completed at a cost of $132,200. Relocation of N. C. Roads 1901/1906 6 10 Itl I'OK'1' OH' 'i'HF; ('IJIFI" OF' N;ti(:1\h;H;K , l . . 1(M1 19K1 %WILMINGT(ON, N. C., I)iSTRICTI' was completed at a cost of $15,400. Relocation of N. C. Road 1907 was completed at a cost of $27,600. Relocation of Southern RW was initiated at a cost of $2,985,700. Utility relocations cost $614,800. Reservoir clearing continued at a cost of $4,112,700. The dam was completed at a cost of $1,616,600. Recreation facilities cost $119,700. Status of plans and specs: All relocations 100 percent; clearing, 100 percent; spillway bridge, 90 percent; Hwy. 50 launch ramp, 55 percent; Sanderling Beach, 45 percent; Holly Point Beach area and ramp, 10 percent; Dr. B. W. Wells Beach area and ramp, 10 percent; Beaverdam Beach and ramp, 10 percent; Wildlife area ramps, 2 percent; and Corps O&M area ramps, 50 percent. Total Federal expenditures were $19,276,211. Condition at end of fiscal year. All road relocations except U. S. 15 and I-85 are complete. Initial clearing and main operations are complete. Complete clearing, initial recreation facilities and relocation of U.S.15 and I-85 are underway. 25. SCUPPERNONG RIVER, N.C. Location. The stream rises in the east-central portion of Washington County, N. C., flows east into Tyrrell County, and thence north into Albemarle Sound, a total distance of about 22 miles. (See Geological Survey quadrangle sheet, Creswell, N. C.) Existing project. The project provides for excavating a 70-foot-bottom-width channel, with depths ranging from 9 feet to 12 feet, along Scuppernong River from Spruills Bridge to the confluence with Mauls Creek, a distance of 2.0 miles, and excavating a 45-foot-bottom-width channel, with depths ranging from 6 feet to 8 feet, along Mauls Creek from Scuppernong River to County Road 1163, a distance of 1.8 miles. Total project length is 3.8 miles. Estimated Federal cost of construction is $386,000 (1981). Project was approved by the Chief of Engineers, October 31, 1966 (with modification adding Mauls Creek approved June 16, 1967), under Section 205, 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local cooperation. Local interests must provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, utility relocations and alterations, and highway or highway-bridge construction and alterations necessary for construction; hold the United States free from damages; maintain and operate project after completion; contribute, in cash, 19.4 percent of construction costs, currently estimated at $82,000; and prevent future encroachment. Formal request has not been made. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Project reanalysis cost $21,739. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project reanalysis and environmental studies are underway with completion scheduled in 1982. A smaller channel on Scuppernong River and deletion of Mauls Creek are anticipated. 26. WRIGHTSVILLE BEACH, N. C. Location. A small island about 10 miles east of Wilmington, N. C. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Map p. 834) Existing project. Construct a dune with a base bordering at or near the building line, with a crown width of 25 feet at elevation 15 feet above mean low water, together with integral construction of a beach berm with a crown width of 50 feet at elevation 12, extending about 14,000 feet from Moores Inlet on the north to Masonboro Inlet on the south. Existing project was authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act (H.D. 511, 87th Cong., 2d sess.). Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Between December 6, 1980 and April 11, 1981, the contract dredge Essex deposited 459,979 cubic yards of material on Wrightsville Beach to restore the project at a Federal cost of $850,239. Contributed funds expended were $986,282 which includes $212,361 additional pumping coats to deposit material from maintenance dredging in the AIWW on Wrightsville Beach, N. C. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project restoration was completed April 10, 1981. 27. YADKIN RIVER BASIN, N. C. AND S. C. Location. The river rises on the eastern slope of the Blue Ridge Mountains in western North Carolina, flows generally easterly about 100 miles to the vicinity of Donnaha, North Carolina, thence southeasterly 104 miles to its confluence with Uwharrie River near Badin, North Carolina, where its name changes to Great Pee Dee River. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of North Carolina.) Existing project. The Flood Control Act of July 24, 1946, authorized construction of four flood control dams in the Upper Yadkin River Basin, two on the Yadkin River above Wilkesboro, North Carolina, and two on Reddies River, a tributary stream. Studies made subsequent to authorization established the economic advantage of providing needed floodcontrol storage in only two reservoirs, one on the Reddies and one on the Yadkin. Present planning considers only the tworeservoir plan, W. Kerr Scott Dam and Reservoir constructed 1962 and Reddies River Lake. W. Kerr Scott was transferred to the Wilmington District from Charleston in fiscal year 1980 while Reddies River remains under Charleston District. (See Table 6-G on Dams and Reservoirs.) 27A. W. KERR SCOTT DAM AND RESERVOIR, N. C. Location. W. Kerr Scott Dam and Reservoir is on Yadkin River, North Carolina, about 6 miles upstream from Wilkesboro. At full flood-control pool elevation (1,075 feet mean sea level), the reservoir extends 15.7 miles upstream to the Wilkes-Caldwell County line. Existing project. The project consists of a rolled earthfill dam 1,740 feet long, with top of dam at elevation 1,107.5 feet mean sea level or about 148 feet above streambed elevation; a spillway near the north abutment of the dam in a rock cut with crest elevation 1,075; and outlet works consisting of an intake structure, control tower, and a circular concrete conduit 12.25 feet in diameter through the base of the dam near the south abutment. The reservoir has a gross capacity of 153,000 acrefeet of which 112,000 acre-feet are reserved for flood control, 33,000 acre-feet will be used as required for water supply, and 8,000 acre-feet being contained in the minimum pool. Estimated cost is $9,095,000 (1981) for new work. The existing project was authorized by the 1946 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. Requirements fully satisfied. For details, see page 413 of Annual Report for 1963. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design cost $500. Maintenance: General operation and maintenance cost $736,119. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was commenced in August 1960 and placed in operation for flood control and water storage purposes in February 1963. 611 28. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS To determine the extent of compliance with approved regulations for maintenance and operation, inspections were made for the following projects during fiscal year 1981: Ellis Swamp, Gates County, N. C.; Gardners Creek, Martin County, N. C.; New River, Onslow County, N. C.; Pungo Creek, Beaufort County, N. C.; South Creek, Beaufort County, N. C.; Pungo River, Beaufort County, N.C.; and Filberts Creek, Edenton, N. C.; Pantego and Cucklers Creek, Beaufort County, N. C.; White Oak Dike, Bladen and Pender Counties, N. C.; Ellerbe Creek, Durham County, N. C.; Pasquotank Dike, Pasquotank County, N. C.; Perquimans River, Perquimans County, N. C.; Core Creek, Craven County, N. C.; Princeville Dike, Edgecombe County, N. C.; Swift Creek, Pitt County, N. C.; Carolina Beach, New Hanover County, N. C.; Wrightsville Beach, New Hanover County, N. C.; Goldsboro, Neuse River, Wayne County, N. C.; Broad Creek, Beaufort County, N. C.; Little Rockfish Creek, Hope Mills, N. C.; Black River, Harnett County, N. C.; and Lick Run, Roanoke, Va. Responsible local officials were advised of inadequacies in maintenance and operation on local flood protection works where appropriate. Cost for the period was $20,466. Total cost to September 30, 1981, was $193,270, charged to operations. 29. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 6-H.) 30. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization). (See Table 6-I.) Emergency flood control activities and hurricane flood and shore-protection activities at Federally authorized projects (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation). This paragraph was not updated in the 1980 report. The following paragraph is to correct that omission. Federal costs for normal operations were $65,708. Emergency operations for Dan River flooding cost $6,308 and $3,662 for Hurricane David. Between March 31 and May 22, 1980, the contract dredge Florida deposited 540,715 cubic yards on Wrightsville Beach, N. C. for emergency restoration at at cost of $520,424. Contributed funds expended were $510,312. Fiscal Year 1981 - Federal costs for normal operations were $56,337. Completion of emergency restoration at Wrightsville Beach, N. C. cost $32. Between April 27 and May 27, 1981, the contract dredge Talcott deposited 345,000 cubic yards on Carolina Beach, N. C. for emergency restoration at a cost of $679,985. Contributed funds in the amount of $272,399 were expended in connection with restoration at Carolina Beach, N. C. National Emergency Preparedness Planning cost $10,674. Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 31. ROANOKE RIVER BASIN, VA. AND N. C. Location. The project is on the Roanoke River and its tributaries in Virginia and North Carolina within a radius of 100 miles from Danville, Virginia. Existing project. The Flood Control Act of 1944 approved a general plan for the comprehensive development of the Roanoke River Basin for flood control and other purposes, and authorized construction of John H. Kerr and Philpott Reservoirs. (See Tables 6-G for a list of dams and reservoirs included in the comprehensive plan.) Local cooperation. None required. John H. Kerr and Philpott Reservoirs are the only projects in the comprehensive plan that have been authorized for construction. (See Table 6-G on Dams and Reservoirs.) 31A. JOHN H. KERR DAM AND RESERVOIR, VA. AND N. C. Location. The project is on Roanoke River, about 178.7 river miles above its mouth, in Mecklenburg County, Virginia, and 20.3 miles downstream from Clarksville, Virginia. The reservoir extends upstream on Roanoke River 56 miles and on Dan River 34 miles. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a concrete gravity dam with wing and saddle dikes on the right and left banks, with a total length of about 22,285 feet. The reservoir is operated as a unit of a coordinated system of reservoirs in the Roanoke River Basin for control of floods, generation of hydroelectric power, regulation of low-water flow, and for other purposes. The power installation is 204,000 kilowatts. (For further details see Annual Report for 1962.) Estimated cost is $67,042,000 (1981) for construction and $24,521,000 for land and damages, including relocation of highways, railroads, and utilities, a total of $91,563,000 for new work. The existing project was authorized by the 1944 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Construction of four comfort stations and one utility building at Northbend Buffalo Public Use Area, Tailrace Area and Rudds Creek was completed at a cost of $4,793. Design was continued at various sites at a cost of $39,492. Cost-sharing development at various sites cost $159,036. Maintenance: General operation and maintenance of the project was performed at a cost of $2,998,266. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for additional recreational facilities. Production of power and protection from floods are provided by project. 31B. PHILPOTT LAKE, VA. Location. On Smith River, Virginia, 44.3 miles above its junction with Dan River, and 35 miles upstream from Virginia- North Carolina State line in Franklin and Henry Counties. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a concrete gravity dam 892 feet long and with a maximum height of 220 feet. Reservoir is operated as a unit of a coordinated reservoir system for flood control in the Roanoke River Basin, generation of hydroelectric power, regulation of low-water flow, and for other purposes. The powerhouse has a total installation of 14,000 kilowatts. (For further details see Annual Report for 1962.) Federal cost estimate is $13,609,000 (1981)for construction and $1,157,000 for lands and damages, a total of $14,766,000. Existing project was authorized by 1944 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Design was continued at various sites at a cost of $48,038. 6 12 ItI ;l't)It"I' 4)1' 'I'fit: ('IIII;F' 4)1' I';ti(.1\ t;I':Itti, ( . ~. / 1{111 1 9 l WILMINGI'ON, N. ('., ISiTRI("I' Maintenance: General operation and maintenance of the project was performed at a cost of $994,694. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is complete except for additional recreational facilities, and is providing power and flood protection. 32. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS A persistent drought that began in the latter part of fiscal year 1980 continued throughout most of fiscal year 1981 in the Wilmington District. John H. Kerr Dam and Reservoir, located in the Roanoke River Basin, Virginia and North Carolina, began fiscal year 1981 at 3.9 feet below rule curve or at elevation 295.61 feet, MSL, with one exception of 294.89 on October 16, 1980. The reservoir fluctuated about 0.5 foot below and above elevation 296 through January 3, 1981. The reservoir surface was drawn down steadily to elevation 292.91 by January 13, 1981 or 2.6 feet below rule curve. Kerr Reservoir remained about 2.0 to 2.5 feet below rule curve until February 4, 1981, when the minimum elevation of the fiscal year occurred at elevation 292.82 or 2.68 feet below rule curve. During February, March and April, periods of rainfall caused a gradual rise of the reservoir level to the maximum elevation of the fiscal year at 300.40 on April 27, 1981, or 1.6 feet below rule curve. Then, with minor fluctuations, the reservoir was drawn down gradually May through September. The fiscal year ended with Kerr Reservoir at elevation 295.10 feet on September 30, 1981, or 4.4 feet below rule curve. Due to low inflows to Kerr Reservoir, a minimum stage of 13 feet in the Roanoke River below Kerr at Weldon, North Carolina could only be maintained for 7 days of the normal 50-day striped bass spawning season. All inflows to Kerr Reservoir were controlled without having to spill water over the spillway, or through the sluices. Gross generation amounted to 161,210,200 kilowatt hours; power revenue was $4.0 million, making an accumulative total since inception of $96.5 million; and no flood damages were prevented, which makes the cumulative amount the same as last year or $58 million. Total cost of functional operations for the period was $95,901. Philpott Lake located on the Smith River, Dan River Basin, Virginia was 1.0 foot below rule curve or at elevation 970.48 feet, MSL at the beginning of the fiscal year. Rainfall over a period of 6 days then caused a gradual rise in the lake level to the maximum elevation of the fiscal year at 971.07 feet, MSL on October 13, 1980 or 0.4 foot below rule curve. Philpott Lake fluctuated about 1.0 foot above and below elevation 970 until August 1980. The lack of rainfall in August and September caused the lake to be drawn down steadily to the minimum elevation of the fiscal year at 961.69 feet on September 30, 1981 or 9.8 feet below rule curve. There were no damaging floods during the fiscal year, so the cumulative flood damages prevented since the project began operation in 1952 remained at $17 million. Gross generation amounted to 13,742,600 kilowatt hours and power revenue was $0.5 million, making a total of $10.6 million since inception. Total cost of functional operation for the period was $53,882. W. Kerr Scott Dam and Reservoir, located on the Yadkin River, in the Pee Dee River Basin, North Carolina, began fiscal year 1981 at elevation 1,027.80 feet, MSL. Rainfall was below normal during October, November, and December, 1980, resulting in drought conditions, and causing the reservoir level (with slight fluctuations) to gradually decline to elevation 1,019.91 feet, MSL on February 1, 1981, the minimum reservoir level for fiscal year 1981. Above normal rainfall during February, 1981 and near normal during March, 1981, stairstepped the reservoir level back to normal pool elevation of 1,030.00 feet, MSL on March 31, 1981. Reservoir levels continued near normal until the end of May, 1981, with the exception of occasional fluctuations slightly below normal pool. Rainfall, which occurred at the end of May and the first of June, 1981, produced a double lake peak, with the first peak being the maximum level for the fiscal year 1981 at 1,038.50 feet, MSL on May 28, 1981. The reservoir level remained near the normal pool elevation through the middle of June, 1981, after which time it began another gradual decline to elevation 1,020.00 feet, MSL on August 14, 1981. With the exception of occasional fluctuations, the reservoir level remained near elevation 1,020.00 feet, MSL through the remainder of fiscal year 1981. W. Kerr Scott Reservoir ended the fiscal year at elevation 1,020,000 feet MSL on September 30, 1981 in a drought condition. There were no flood damages prevented during the fiscal year which makes the cumulative total equal to $44 million. Total cost of functional operation for the period was $53,502. B. Everett Jordan Dam and Lake project, located in the Cape Fear River Basin, North Carolina, was operated until September 1, 1981 of the fiscal year as a "dry reservoir" with gates fully open, except for several days when dam inspections were being made. Due to the limited capacity of the discharge facilities, inflow exceeded outflow on numerous occasions causing the lake levels to fluctuate considerably. The maximum elevation for the fiscal year occurred on July 4, 1981 at elevation 195.9 feet, MSL and the minimum elevation of 159.0 feet, MSL was repeated numerous times during the periods of low inflows. Otherwise, lake levels typically remained near 159-165 feet, MSL. Closing of the gates on September 1, marked the beginning of permanent filling of the lake, ending over a decade since the initial ground breaking on December 7, 1970. Numerous legal actions, construction delays, and modifications have plagued the project. The filling of the project began with the lake at elevation 159.5 feet, MSL. The lake rose gradually to elevation 168.7 feet by September 5, 1981. Rainfall on September 5-7 produced high inflows that caused the lake to rise to elevation 190.2 feet MSL on September 8, 1981. During the period of September 8-13, 1981, the lake level was held in the 190-192 feet range to allow piezometer readings and other measurements to be made. During the remaining period, low inflows produced a slow rise to elevation 193.8 feet, MSL on September 30, 1981. Flood damages prevented, if any, were not determined. Total cost of functional operation for the period was $43,695. General Investigations 33. SURVEYS Cost for the period was $1,594,212, of which $490 was for navigation studies, $547,456 was for flood control studies, $305,011 was for beach erosion studies, $180,587 for review of completed projects, $828 for project deauthorization review, $500 for soil conservation service, $6,072 for water quality management, $28,590 for coastal zone management, $1,500 for national wild and scenic rivers, $2,626 for technical assistance for shore and streambank erosion, $11,798 for hydrologic studies, $50,583 for cooperation with states, and $458,171 for dam inspection and inventory. 6 13 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1981 General Investigations (Continued) 34. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Flood plain information studies, as authorized by Section 206, 1960 Flood Control Act, as amended, comprise compilation and dissemination, upon the request of a State or a political subdivision thereof, of information on floods and flood damages, including identification of areas subject to inundation by floods of various magnitudes and frequencies, and general criteria for guidance of Federal and non-Federal interests and agencies in the use of flood plain areas; and provide advice to other Federal agencies and local interests for their use in planning to ameliorate the flood hazard. Total costs for the period were $199,969.Total costs to September 30, 1981 were $2,753,674. (See Table 6-J for Completed Flood Plain Studies.) 6-14 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT TABLE 6-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 September 30, 1981 1. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway between Norfolk, Va. & St. Johns River, Fla. (Regular Funds) 2. Beaufort Harbor, N.C. (Contributed Funds) 3. Cape Fear River, N. C. above Wilmington 4. Channel from Back Sound to Lookout Bight, N. C. 5. Lockwoods Folly River, N. C. 6. Manteo (Shallowbag) Bay, N. C. (Contributed Funds) 7. Morehead City Harbor, N. C. (Contributed Funds) 8. Ocracoke Inlet, N. C. 9. Silver Lake Harbor, N. C. (Contributed Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost 4,015,000 1,773,692 3,583,715 4,192,222 3,080,000 4,852,500 3,977,694 4,059,147 3,398,7752 3,874,0242 3,380,400 3,468,592 390,260 312,374 110,585 395,307 269,441 153,518 - - 4,500 - - 4,500 647,751 335,589 1,153,460 617,079 366,905 972,028 93,433 93,322 174,216 174,216 220,000 193,975 941,547 1,036,264 2,235,000 4,409,042 1,371,353 1,352,955 112,997 445,034 110,922 445,670 - 93,5458 - 84,2319 103,620 201,302 103,620 201,302 285,000 1,387,000 284,885 977,550 871,910 1,180,672 831,929 1,230,064 - 54,000 - 54,000 1,587 18,689 105,200 84,466 -4,411 1,777,561 1,794,868 22,859 109,502 54,832 22,859 109,502 54,500 32,645 32,645 310,940 144,300 310,940 124,210 - 75,000 6 15 2,564,000 2,558,817 5,501,525 4,669,699 13,327 13,327 471,611 652,010 12,235 10,633 21,000'10 3,15110 197,857 196,407 1,529,000 1,543,013 1,850,445 1,847,785 25,337,416' 25,169,114' 48,532,1123 47,671,1023 598,3894 598,3894 2,355,8145 2,355,8145 110,078 110,078 3,759,5736 3,759,5736 10,448,4137 10,445,238' 88,328 88,328 1,771,571 1,768,419 164,294 137,131 1,173,046 1,171,596 5,105,945" 4,684,248" 14,127,507 14,108,914 54,000 54,000 6,546,05312 6,546,05312 22,273,26213 22,038,52413 595,669 435,091 346,240 346,240 844,044 840,169 184,284 184,284 2,097,218 2,096,558 75,000 75,000 3,548,007 3,335,094 490,112 329,534 29,000 25,457 345,526 364,956 75,000 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OFF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 6-A(Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 September 30, 1981 10. Waterway Connecting Pamlico Sound and Beaufort Harbor, N.C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 11. Wilmington Harbor, N. C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 15. Fort Fisher and Vicinity, N. C. 17. Adkin Branch, N. C. 18. Black River, N. C. 19A. B. Everett Jordan Dam and Lake, N. C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 19B. Randleman Lake, N. C. 20. Carolina Beach and Vicinity, N. C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 21. Deep Creek, N. C. 22. Joyce Creek, N. C. 23. Leesville, Va. - Roanoke River, Sec. 32, Demo Project 24A. Falls Lake, N. C. 25. Scuppernong River, N.C. New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib: Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 81 4,874 27,643 1,587 1,299,939 1,526,809 94,416 16 - 1,766 - 1,766 290,000 305,645 1,347,000 1,333,031 143,720 137,713' - - 37,901 40,000 72,260 32,777 298,000 51,000 39,898 220,255 8,700,000 5,925,000 8,104,548 8,507,742 - 284,800 - 251,986 614,000 540,000 548,336 549,830 - - 1,586 95 - 18,200 13,000 20 30,348 12,977 20 21,499 21 23,000 22 27,809 21 19,784 22 120,000 124,355 13,480 9,305 17,000,000 18,100,000 15,050,259 19,009,130 - 10,000 27 - 10,000 27 6-16 18,216 16,696 - 963 4,016,800 4,048,204 514,347 489,83418 260,000 213,399 9,000 5,478 - 23,000 73,256 3,548,000 3,425,461 214,028 238,554 800,000 830,789 275,000 184,248 19,000 17,997 36,000 23 31,348 23 113,400 25 20,556 25 24,033,000 19,557,763 10,000 28 5,206 28 10,826 12,346 3,074,000 2,814,849 475,232 109,970 '19 230,000 155,712 -9,000 3,019 -5,000 3,784 3,562,000 3,849,535 409,828 370,046 200,000 199,508 530,761 236,332 6,000 3,578 63,000 24 63,954 24 10,000 28 316,424 26 16,057,000 19,276,211 29,000 29 21,739 29 502,567 502,567 1,610,968 1,610,968 2,452 2,452 18,715,226"14 18,715,22614 34,218,470 5 33,949,80815 2,184,799 1,780,758 490,000 369,111 219,477 219,235 476,290 470,735 88,322,700 87,186,127 1,721,389 1,721,389 908,656 860,586 3,438,588 3,308,564 2,262,533 1,877,352 790,988 779,672 176,555 172,750 254,149 246,363 367,755 359,765 105,550,996 102,838,507 122,905 110,850 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT TABLE 6-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 September 30, 1981 26. Wrightsville Beach, N.C. (Contributed Funds) 27A. W. Kerr Scott Dam and Reservoir, N. C. 31A. Roanoke River Basin, Va., and N. C., John H. Kerr Dam and Reservoir 31B. Roanoke River Basin, Va., and N. C., Philpott Lake, Va. New Work: Approp. Cost Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost 805 85 651,400 733,900 643,575 641,878 692,071 642,344 154,000 361,000 - 18,000 110,545 366,931 92,731 2,992,407 2,645,119 42,000 16,337 2,779,254 3,003,740 3,012,183 2,861,728 71,000 70,359 - 50,000 5,616 871,000 747,700 826,616 828,362 760,478 836,790 1. Includes $198,707 for previous projects. 2. Includes $37,763 for preauthorization cost. 3. Includes $107,634 for previous projects. 4. Includes $25,000 for previous projects. 5. Includes $12,854 for previous projects. 6. Includes $149,119 for previous projects. 7. Includes $8,178 for previous projects. 8. Includes preauthorization study funds: FY 64, $3,000; FY 65, - $2,755; FY 71, $8,000; FY 72, $2,000; FY 74, $9,000; FY 75, $25,000; FY 76 & 76T, $20,000; FY 77, $2,500; FY 78, $8,800; FY 79, $3,000; and preconstruction planning funds: FY 80, $15,000. 9. Includes preauthorization study costs: FY 64, $219; FY 65, $26; FY 71, $8,000; FY 72, $1,448; FY 73, $552; FY 74, $9,000; FY 75, $11,925; FY 76 & 76T, $27,977; FY 77, $7,598; FY 78, $7,449; FY 79, $4,351; and preconstruction planning costs: FY 80, $5,686. 10. Includes $1,680 preauthorization cost. 11. Adjusted by $6,361 to reflect actual cost. 12. Includes $44,484 for previous projects. 13. Includes $284,557 for previous projects. 14. Includes $4,625,614 for new work on previous projects. 15. Includes $602,614 for previous projects. 16. Includes $92,374 refund to local interests. 17. Includes $8,000 refund to local interests. 18. Includes $14,007 refund to local interests. 19. Includes $1,847 refund to local interests. 20. Includes $309 preauthorization cost. 21. Includes $1,492 preauthorization cost. 22. Includes $11,474 preauthorization cost. 23. Includes $22,556 preauthorization cost. 24. Includes $9,706 preauthorization cost. 25. Includes $7,414 monitoring cost. 26. Includes $10,842 preauthorization cost. 27. Preauthorization cost. 28. Includes $5,206 preauthorization cost. 29. Includes $21,739 preauthorization cost. 30. Includes $3,081 refund to local interests. 6-17 850,239 850,239 1,092,800 986,282 30 500 500 1,563,041 1,563,041 1,441,300 1,334,782 8,841,326 8,841,326 7,040,392 6,996,705 89,220,527 89,025,625 37,264,686 36,959,730 14,272,784 14,244,321 11,770,266 11,629,433 690,206 736,119 34,100 203,322 2,945,520 2,998,266 62,400 48,038 1,098,531 994,694 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 6-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents July 25, 1912 July 25, 1912 August 8, 1917 July 18, 1918 Jan. 21, 1927 July 3, 1930 March 4, 19332 June 26, 19343 August 26, 1937 August 26, 1937 June 20, 1938 June 20, 1938 March 2, 1945 June 30, 1948 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 September 3, 1954 Nov. 29, 1963, sec. 107 July 14, 1960 April 7, 1966, sec. 107 July 14, 1960 Nov. 7, 1966 Nov. 7, 1966 Dec. 31, 1970 October 22, 1976 August 13, 1968 ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA., and ST. JOHNS_ RIVER, FLA. (See Section 1 of text) Original route of the Norfolk-Beaufort Inlet section. Purchase of canal. Change in route; following changes approved by Secretary of War, April 14, 1919: Albemarle Sound-Pamlico Sound section: Changed from "Alligator River-Rose Bay route" to "Alligator River-Pungo River route." Pamlico Sound-Neuse River Section: Changed from "Pamlico Sound-Brant Shoal Neuse River route" to "Goose Creek-Bay River route." Alligator River-Pungo route (proposed land cut connecting the rivers): Changed from a straight line to a bent line approaching nearer town of Fairfield, N. C. A 12-foot channel 90 feet wide from Beaufort to Cape Fear River, N. C., including highway bridge and tidal lock. 4 An 8-foot channel 75 feet wide from Cape Fear River to Winyah Bay, S. C. Construct a suitable bridge near Fairfield, N. C. Operating and care of works of improvements provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors. Increasing dimensions of waterway to 12 feet deep and 90 feet wide. A 12-foot side channel 90 feet wide to Swansboro. A yacht basin near Southport, 12 feet deep, 230 feet wide, and 450 feet long, with connecting channel. A 6-foot channel 90 feet wide from New River Inlet to Inland Waterway. Six mooring basins. A 12-foot channel in New River. 5 Vicinity of Fairfield, drainage. Masonboro Inlet and connecting channels, including jetties at the inlet. 6 A 12-foot channel and basin in Peltier Creek.7 A 6-foot channel 90 feet wide from Intracoastal Waterway to Bogue Inlet gorge. An 8-foot channel 150 feet wide through New Topsail Inlet, thence a 7-foot channel 80 ft. wide to Intracoastal Waterway by way of Old Topsail Creek; and a 7-foot channel 80 feet wide in Banks Channel from New Topsail Inlet, paralleling barrier beach, to Intracoastal Waterway. Maintenance of a channel, 6 feet deep, 80 feet wide, and 8,000 feet long, from the through channel of the waterway to and including a basin of the same depth, 130 feet wide and 180 feet long at Carolina Beach. Maintenance of general navigation features of N. C. State Ports Authority Small Boat Harbor at Southport. Replacement of Federally-owned and operated highway bridges at Coinjock, Fairfield, Wilkerson Creek, Hobucken, and Core Creek. Modification of terms of local cooperation to allow for full Federal funding of Wilkerson Creek and Coinjock Bridges. Mitigation of damages caused by north jetty at Masonboro Inlet. H. D. 391, 62d Cong., 2d sess. H.D. 589, 62d Cong., 2d sess. H. D. 1478, 63d Cong., 3d sess. and H. D. 1136, 64th Cong., 1st sess. 1 Approved by Secretary of War, May 15, 1919. H. D. 450, 69th Cong., 1st sess. H. D. 41, 71st Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 5, 72d Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee, Doc. 6, 75th Cong., 1st sess. 1 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 75th Cong., 1st sess. 1 H. D. 549, 75th Cong., 3d sess. 1 H. D. 691, 75th Cong., 3d sess. 1 H. D. 660, 76th Cong., 3d sess. 1 H. D. 421, 80th Cong., 1st sess.' H. D. 723, 80th Cong., 2d sess. 1 H. D. 341, 81st Cong., 1st sess. 1 H. D. 379, 81st Cong., 1st sess.1 Detailed Project Report April 1963. Detailed Project Report. July 1965 H. D. 515, 89th Cong., 2d sess.l H.D. 514, 89th Cong., 2d sess. 1 H. D. 142, 92nd Cong., 1st sess. H. D. 597, 94th Cong., 2d sess. Approved by OCE Oct. 2, 1980 6 18 TARII. -R (CnntinuA) WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT A THfRIIN .I(SIA. TIFTIN Acts Work Authorized Documents BEAUFORT HARBOR, N. C. (See Section 2 of text) March 3, 1881 A 9-foot channel 200 feet wide through Bulkhead Channel to Annual Report, 1881, p. 1013 Beaufort; a 6-foot channel 100 feet wide to North River and Core Sound; and construct jetties on Shackleford Point. March 2, 1907 Repairs to Fort Macon jetties and additional jetties and Specified in act. shore protection. March 3, 1925 Bulkhead across Bird Shoal. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 8, 68th Cong., 2d sess.1 July 3, 1930 Increase in depth to 12 feet in Bulkhead Channel, Gallants H. D. 776, 69th Cong., 2d sess.1 Channel, and in front of Beaufort. March 2, 1945 Increase in width and length of basin in front of Beaufort, H. D. 334, 76th Cong., 1st sess.1 all to 12 feet deep. May 17, 1950 Increase in depth to 12 feet and in width to 100 feet in H. D. 111, 81st Cong., 1st sess.1 Taylors Creek; transfer to Beaufort Harbor project. May 21, 1965 Channels 15 feet deep, 100 feet wide in Bulkhead, Gallants Detailed Project Report sec. 107 and Taylors Creek channels, and through turning basin in April 1965 July 14, 1960 front of Beaufort; and harbor of refuge in Town Creek, 12 feet deep, 400 feet wide, and 900 feet long connected to Gallants Channel by channel 12 feet deep, 150 feet wide, and 1,400 feet long. SILVER LAKE HARBOR, N. C. (See Section 9 of text) July 3, 1930 Entrance channel, 5 feet deep and 50 feet wide, from Rivers and Harbors Committee Pamlico Sound to the 3-foot contour in the lake, and training Doc. No. 3, 70th Cong., 1st sess. wall at entrance. Oct. 17, 1940 Channel, 10 feet deep, and anchorage basin of same depth, H. D. 325, 76th Cong., 1st sess. 1 100 feet wide across Big Foot Slough and 60 feet wide in entrance. Feb. 7, 1967 Basin depth of 12 feet in Silver Lake Harbor; channels 12 Detailed Project Report sec. 107 feet deep, 150 feet wide, in Teaches Hole and Big Foot July 9, 1965 July 14, 1960 Slough Channels and across Bluff Shoal; entrance channel, same depth, 60 feet wide; and training wall on south side of entrance channel. 1. Contains latest published maps. 2. Public Law No. 443, 72d Cong. 3. Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. 4. Tidal lock in land cut between Myrtle Sound and Cape Fear River. 5. A 12-foot by 90-foot channel in New River from Intracoastal Waterway to and including a basin at Jacksonville, N. C. 6. Jetties on each side of Masonboro Inlet. 7. A 6- by 50-foot channel provided under Section 3, River and Harbor Act of March 2, 1945; 12 by 90-foot project classified as inactive. 6 19 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 6-C RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS (See Section 12 of Text) Project Date Survey Conducted Avon Harbor, N. C. January 1981 Far Creek, N. C. October 1980 Rollinson Channel, N. C. July 1981 Waterway Connecting Pamlico Sound and Beaufort Harbor, N. C. August 1981 6-20 WILMINGTON, N. C., I)ISTRICT TABLE 6-D OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Section 13 of Text) For Last Full Report Cost to September 30, 1981 See Annual Operation and Project Report for Construction Maintenance Aquatic Plant Controls1 (R & H Act of 1958 and 1962) 1969 70,664 Aquatic Plant Control (R & H Act of 1965) 1978 125,534 - Atlantic Beach Channels, N. C. 1976 29,1014 66,630 Avon Harbor, N. C.1 1975 74,096 89,735 Bay River, N. C.1 1950 44,382 49,627 Belhaven Harbor, N. C.1 1974 126,687 39,100 Black River, N. C. 1969 12,358 124,846 Cashie River, N. C. 1950 40,403 15,905 Channel Connecting Thoroughfare Bay with Cedar Bay, N. C.1 1975 69,610 25,615 Channel from Pamlico Sound to Rodanthe, N. C. 1 1975 42,029 5,685 Chowan River, N. C. 1950 - - Contentnea Creek, N. C. 1 1941 64,395 32,247 Drum Inlet, N. C. 1 1979 166,119 1,049,187 Edenton Harbor, N. C. 1 1960 73,750 47,642 Far Creek, N. C.1 1978 164,642 545,504 Fishing Creek, N. C.1 1922 22,715 8,633 Harbor of Refuge, N. C. 1934 1,363,799 32,854 Knobb's Creek, N. C. 1 , 2 19613 80,500 47,664 Mackay Creek, N. C. 1 19383 13,375 6,273 Neuse River, N. C. 1 1980 477,223 6 324,973 Newbegun Creek, N. C. 19283 4,802 247 Northeast (Cape Fear) River, N. C. 1 1950 10,688 61,139 Pamlico and Tar Rivers, N. C.1 1980 674,651 768,978 Pembroke Creek, N. C. 1976 60,000 - Perquimans River, N. C.1 19103 13,750 414 Roanoke River, N. C. 1 1980 404,584 548,908 Rollinson Channel, N. C. 1 1980 589,105 749,482 Scuppernong River, N. C. 1 1950 81,164 80,682 Shallotte River, N. C. 1976 18,181 134,636 Smiths Creek, Pamlico County, N. C.1 1975 113,273 36,048 Smiths Creek (Wilmington), N. C.1 1950 8,507 18 South River, N. C.1 1936 12,452 23,686 Stumpy Point Bay, N. C. 1 1980 268,381 735,201 Swift Creek, N. C.1 1940 1,600 5,422 Trent River, N. C. 1 , 5 1968 115,199 143,579 Wallace Channel, Pamlico Sound, N. C. 1965 132,834 85,221 Waterway Connecting Swapquarter Bay with Deep Bay, N. C.' 1978 110,799 182,450 Waterway - Norfolk, Va. to Sounds of N. C. 1976 751,196 2,887,189 Wright's Creek, N. C. 1 1978 68,325 166,233 1. Completed. 4. Includes $2,055 refund to local interests. 2. Transferred from Norfolk District (FY 1970); Meherrin 5. 8-foot modification deauthorized August 5, 1977 under River, N. C., Transferred to Norfolk District. authority of Sec. 12, PL 93-251. 3. Report of Norfolk District. 6. Includes $1,959 refund to local interests on Dawson Creek, N. C. 6 -21 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1981 NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation Activities Pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (preauthorization) TABLE 6-E (See Section 14 of Text) Study Identification Atlantic Beach Channels Belhaven Harbor, N. C. Calico Creek, N. C. Carolina Beach Inlet, N. C. Swanquarter Bay, N. C. Fiscal Period Cost 11,381 13,530 25,398 6,906 64,682 OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS TABLE 6-F (See Section 16 of Text) For Last Full Report Cost to September 30, 1981 See Annual Report for Operation and Project Construction Maintenance Fort Macon State Park, N. C. 1973 620,000 6-22 -- TABLE 6-G DAMS AND RESERVOIRS See Miles Height Reservoir Power Estimated Section Project Name Nearest City River Above of Type Capacity Development Construe Cost Lands Total in Text Mouth Dam (ft) (acre-feet) (kilowatts) tion and Damages 1 19. Cape Fear B. Everett Jordan 2 Moncure, N.C. Haw 4.3 112 E 778,000 - 66,376,400 57,623,000 124,000.000 3 River Basin, Howards Mill 2 , 14 Carthage, N.C. Deep 55.0 106 E 233,000 - 18,874,000 14,726,000 33,600,000 12 N.C. Randleman 2 Randleman, N.C. Deep 85.0 110 E 108,000 - 58,329,000 50,671,000 109,000,000 13 Small reservoirs - Various - 20 to 70 + E 923,000 - - - 38,454,000 24. Neuse River Falls 2 Falls, N.C. Neuse - 92 E 397,000 - 66,198,000 86,802,000 153,000,000 4 Basin, N.C. Wilson Mills Wilson Mills, N.C. Neuse - 81 CG,E 201,000 - - - 13,000,000 Beulahtown Kenly, N.C. Little - 50 E 81,000 - - -9,300,000 Bakers Mills Princeton, N.C. Little - 53 E 36,000 - - -6,600,000 Little Buffalo Kenly, N.C. Little Buffalo Creek - 51 E 13,000 - - -1,100,000 Buckhorn Wilson, N.C. Contentnea Creek - 63 E 119,000 - - -17,300,000 Wiggins Mill Wilson, N.C. Contentnea Creek - 42 E 35,000 - -- 6,700,000 Stantonsburg Stantonsburg, N.C. Tisnot Swamp - 36 E 48,000 - - - 5,100,000 Great Swamp Fremont, N.C. Great Swamp - 39 E 18,000 - - -1,800,000 Black Creek Wilson, N.C. Black Creek - 33 E 17,000 - - -1,500,000 Aycock Swamp Fremont, N.C. Aycock Swamp - 37 E 7,000 - - - 550,000 Hillsboro Durham, N.C. Eno - 136 E 123,000 - - -8,100,000 Orange Durham, N.C. Little - 107 E 57,000 - - -3,500,000 27. Yadkin River W. Kerr Scott, N.C. Wilkesboro, N.C. Yadkin Pee DI)ee 404.0 148 E 153,000 - 5,734,343 3,360,657 9,095,000 Basin, N.C.&S.C. 31. Roanoke River John H. Kerr, Va., and Boydton, Va. Roanoke 178.7 144 CG,E 2,808,000 204,000 67,042,000 24,521,000 91,563,000 5 Basin, Va. and N.C. 2 N.C. Philpott, Va. 2 Bassett, Va. Roanoke 336.2 220 CG 1 1 249,800 14,000 13,609,000 1,157,000 14,766,000 Gaston, Va. and N.C. 6 Roanoke Rapids, N.C. Roanoke 144.9 108 CG,E 432,000 54,000 27,000,000 3,500,000 30,500,000 Roanoke Rapids, N.C. 7 Roanoke Rapids, N.C. Roanoke 137.0 75 CG 59,300 83,000 31,300,000 800,000 32,100,000 Smith Mountain, Va. 8 Altavista, Va. Roanoke 314.2 244 CG 825,000 41,000 28,000,000 3,800,000 31,800,000 Leesville, Va. 9 Altavista, Va. Roanoke 293.7 95 CGE 76,900 20,000 9,100,000 1,000,000 10,100,000 Taber, Va. Altavista, Va. Roanoke 275.0 54 CG 34,000 12,000 8,000,000 1,700,000 9,700,000 Melrose, Va. Brookneal, Va. Roanoke 262.9 110 CG,E 120,000 43,000 17,700,000 6,000,000 23,700,000 10 Randolph, Va. Chase City, Va. Roanoke 227.8 147 CG,E 350,000 48,000 22,100,000 4,700,000 26,800,000 Stuart, Va. and N.C. Spray, N.C. Roanoke 297.2 138 E 163,000 15,000 9,000,000 1,100,000 10,100,000 Schoolfield, Va. and N.C. Danville, Va. Roanoke 265.9 126 CG,E 248,000 80,000 27,800,000 6,400,000 36,000,000 1. Includes highway, railroad, and utility relocations. 2. For details, see individual report. 3. Includes $3,500,000 presently allocated to water supply to be reimbursed in the future by local interests. 4. Includes $12,300,000 presently allocated to water supply and $21,700,000 recreation and fish and wildlife. 5. Exclusive of transmission lines. 6. Construction completed in 1963 by Virginia Electric and Power Co. 7. Based on modified plan developed in fiscal year 1949. Construction completed June 1955 by Virginia Electric and Power Co. 8. Construction completed in February 1966 by Appalachian Power Co. 9. Construction completed in June 1963 by Appalachian Power Co. 10. Includes cost of earth dam on Whipping Creek. 11. Authorizing legislation provided for earth dam; concrete gravity dam con structed. 12. Includes $1,600,000 presently allocated to recreation and fish and wildlife. 13. Includes $43,100,000 presently allocated to water supply and $15,100,000 allocated to recreation. 14. Reclassified to the deferred category 2 October 1980. Key E - Earth CG - Concrete Gravity rN r= z 0E z zE a REPORT OF THE CHIEF OOFE NGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 6-H OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 29 of Texti For Last Cost to September 30, 1981 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Broad Creek, Beaufort County, N. C. 1 1972 283,846 Brunswick County Beaches, N. C. (Cape Fear to North Carolina- South Carolina State Line) 1976 572,1145 - Conetoe Creek, N. C. 1 1960 29,867 - Contentnea Creek, N. C.1 1939-1943 50,889 - and 1958 Core Creek, N. C. 1 1965 236,2239 - Ellerbe Creek, Durham County, N. C. 1 1963 223,413 Ellis Swamp, Gates County, N. C. 1 1971 138,1176 - Filberts Creek, N. C. 1 1970 37,7773 - Gapway Swamp, N. C. & S. C. 1, 10 1969 339,197 - Gardners Creek, N. C.1 1972 54,5978 Goldsboro, Neuse River, N. C. 1974 50,430 235,787 Howards Mill Lake, N. C. 1980 698,400 Lick Run, Roanoke, Va.1 1974 1,280,317 Little Rockfish Creek, Hope Mills, N. C. 1978 113,657 Little Sugar Creek, Charlotte, N. C. 1, 10 1979 763,022 New River, N. C. 1 1950 & 1956 51,896 - New River, Onslow County, N. C. 1 1972 580,977 Northeast (Cape Fear) River, N. C. 1 1961 95,873 - Ocracoke Island, N. C. 1975 129,592 - Old Field Swamp, N. C.1 , 10 1969 86,600 - Pantego Creek and Cucklers Creek, N. C. 1963 517,948 - Pasquotank River, N. C. 1960 80,931 - Perquimans River, N. C. 1 1961 6,366 - Pungo Creek, N. C.1 1972 582,270 - Pungo River, N. C. 1' 2 1971 296,6023 - Simmons Bay, N. C. 1 0 1963 186,435 - South Creek, N. C. 1 1971 194,3677 - Swift Creek, Pitt and Craven Counties, N. C. 1 1966 611,096 Tar River, N. C. 1964 81,266 61,473 Tar River, N. C. 1 1947 18,624 - Tar River and tributaries, N. C. 1 1943 22,660 - Tar River, Princeville, N. C. 1967 390,249 - Tranters Creek, N. C. 1 1974 139,339 Trent River, N. C. 1 1953 64,769 - Waccamaw River & Seven Creeks, N. C. & S. C. 1, 10 1961 67,821 - White Oak Dike, Bladen and Pender Counties, N. C.1 1963 214,286 1. Project authorized by Chief of Engineers under special 6. Includes $1,519 refund to local interests. continuing authority. 7. Includes $387 refund to local interests. 2. Includes $17,356 refund to local interests. 8. Includes $338 refund to local interests. 3. Adjusted to reflect actual cost. 9. Adjusted $3,000 to include preauthorization cost prior to 4. Includes $3,081 refund to local interests. FY 1960. 5. Includes $116,508 refund to local interests. 10. Transferred from Charleston District, FY 1980. 6-24 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (Preauthorization) TABLE 6-I (See Section 30 of Text) Study Identification Fiscal Period Cost Ararat River, Surry County, N. C. 111,533 Cashie River, N. C. 4,718 Columbia, Tyrrell County, N. C. 10 Pinetops, Town Creek, Edgecombe County, N. C. 3,507 Roanoke Island, N. C.2 290 South River, N. C. 1 3,000 Shoreline Erosion Control- Sec. 542 14,649 Old Field Swamp, Fairmont, N. C. 7,500 1. Accomplished pursuant to Section 208. 2. Accomplished pursuant to Section 54. FLOOD PLAIN STUDIES COMPLETED DURING FISCAL PERIOD TABLE 6-J (See Section 34 of Text) Requesting Date Federal Location Agency Completed Cost None 6-25 CHARLESTON, S.C., DISTRICT* This district comprises all of South Carolina (except local watersheds draining into the Savannah River). Due to a recent realignment, work underway in westerncentral North Carolina, formerly in our district, will be carried through its current phase before being turned over to Wilmington. It embraces the drainage basins tributary to the Atlantic Ocean between Little River and Port Royal Sound, except watersheds of Mackay and Skull Creeks, and excluding Hilton Head Island. IMPROVEMENTS Page Beach Erosion Control 1. Aquatic Plant Control, S. . .............................. 7-2 2. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Between Norfolk, Va. and St. Johns River, Fla. .............................. 7-2 3. Charleston Harbor, S.C. ........... 7-3 4. Cooper River, Charleston Harbor, S.C ...................... 7-4 5. Folly River, S.C. ................. 7-4 6. Georgetown Harbor, S.C...........7-5 7. Little River Inlet, N.C. and S.C. .......................... 7-5 8. Lynches River & Clark Creek, S.C. ....................... 7-6 9. Murrells Inlet, S.C................7-6 10. Port Royal Harbor, S.C ........... 7-7 11. Shipyard River, S.C............. 7-7 12. Town Creek, S.C. ................. 7-7 13. Village Creek, S.C...............7-8 14. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys ............... 7-8 15. Other Authorized Navigation Projects .......................... 7-8 16. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ............ 7-8 17. Hunting Island Beach, S.C..........7-8 18. Beach Erosion Control Work Under Special Authorization ................... 7-9 Flood Control 19. Leith Creek, S.C................. 7-9 20. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ............. 7-9 21. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ................. 7-9 22. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ............. 7-9 General Investigations 23. Surveys ........................... 7-9 24. Collection and Study of Basic Data ....................... 7-10 *All costs and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 7-1 Navigation Page REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY, FY 1981 Navigation 1. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL, S.C. Location. The project areas include navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters in the Charleston District. Existing Projects. The project provides for control and progressive eradication of waterhyacinth, alligatorweed, Eurasian watermilfoil and other obnoxious aquatic plant growths from navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters of the United States, in combined interest of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, public health and related purposes, including continued research for development of most effective and economic control measures in cooperation with other Federal and State agencies in accordance with report of Chief of Engineers. The act provides that research and planning cost shall be borne fully by the United States. (See table at end of chapter for acts authorizing existing project.) Local Cooperation. Local interests must agree to hold the United States free from damages that may occur from operations performed in connection with this project, and contribute 30 percent of the cost of field operations. Requirements are being met in South Carolina. Operations and Results During Fiscal Year. New Work: A final General Design Memorandum and Environmental Impact Statement for Aquatic Plant Management in South Carolina has been prepared. The proposed program provides for a comprehensive plan to manage noxious aquatic plants within the state waters of South Carolina including the Santee-Cooper Lakes. Target species include Brazilian elodea, alligator weed and water primrose. A reconnaissance survey of noxious aquatic plants in South Carolina was made during the period. Results of the survey indicated that Brazilian elodea and water primrose are the worst aquatic plant problems in the State public waters. Brazilian elodea alone has infested an estimated 26,000 acres of Lake Marion. Through the use of biological control agents (stem borers and flea beetles) alligator weed growths have been reduced to a non-problem status in most navigable waters. Alligator weed growths, however, still obstruct many river oxbows, back waters and coves. A contract for a cooperative aquatic plant control program with South Carolina Water Resources Commission was negotiated. Costs incurred were $42,691 for planning and reconnaissance survey and $85,700 in connection with contract work. Condition at end of fiscal year. A final General Design Memorandum for noxious aquatic plant management is complete which outlines control procedures. 2. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA., AND ST. JOHNS RIVER, FLA. (CHARLESTON DISTRICT) Location. The project starts at Little River near the North Carolina-South Carolina state line and extends generally south along the coast of South Carolina 62 miles to Winyah Bay; thence 63.5 miles to Charleston; thence 84.5 miles to and including Port Royal Sound; a total of 210 miles. (See National Ocean Survey Charts Nos. 11513, 11521, 11531, 11534 and 11535.) Previous projects. For further details see page 613 of Annual Report for 1932. Existing project. The project provides for a waterway 12 feet deep and not less than 90 feet wide with a branch channel of the same dimensions to McClellanville and construction of three bridges crossing the waterway in Horry County, South Carolina. (See table at end of chapter for acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Requirements fully satisfied. Terminal facilities. There are rail-water terminals at Georgetown, Charleston, Johns Island and Port Royal and numerous openpile wharves mostly for shipping agricultural products, fish, oysters, pulpwood, wood products, and petroleum products. Marinas are located at convenient intervals along the waterway where limited supplies and repair facilities are available for both commercial vessels and pleasure craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce and recreation requirements. 7-2 CHARLESTON, S.C., DISTRICT Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contract maintenance dredging was performed by the pipeline dredge Marion during February - June 1981, removing 276,068 cubic yards of material at a cost of $813,393. Costs of $724,102 were incurred for contract dike management. Costs of Riverine Utility Craft Operation were $13,169. Mosquito abatement control contract costs were $66,452. Clearing and snagging by the U. S. maintenance vessel Snell was performed at a cost of $96,000. Condition surveys, shoaling studies, reestablishment of rights-of-way, engineering and design, and supervision and administration costs were $548,468. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was completed in 1940; three bridges were completed in 1936. Federal costs of existing project to date have been $7,345,898 for new work and $32,471,117 for maintenance, for a total of $39,817,015. 3. CHARLESTON HARBOR, S. C. Location. The harbor is located on the coast of South Carolina about 15 miles south of the midpoint of the coastline, 50 miles southwest of Winyah Bay, S. C., and 80 miles northeast of the mouth of Savannah River. (See National Ocean Survey Charts Nos. 11521 and 11524.) Previous projects. For further details see page 1808 of Annual Report for 1915; page 579 of Annual Report for 1926; and page 562 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 35 feet deep with varying widths from the Atlantic Ocean to the mouth of Goose Creek, a total of 26.3 miles, together with a 35-foot depth by 500- foot width channel via Town Creek. Also, a 10-foot depth by 110-foot width channel on the Mount Pleasant side of the harbor into Shem Creek to U. S. Highway 17 Bridge, and a 30-foot anchorage basin in the lower Moultrie. A 40-foot channel estimated to cost $6,060,000 (1960) was authorized to be executed when found necessary in the interests of national defense from the 40-foot contour in Atlantic Ocean to U. S. Naval Base. For further details see page 425 of Annual Report for 1962. The Phase I Design Memoramdum stage of Advance Engineering and Design for deepening of the 35-foot channel to 40 feet (42 feet in the ocean bar and entrance channel) from the 42-foot ocean contour to Goose Creek, a total distance of 26.9 miles, construction of one turning basin, modification of existing turning basins, deepening and modification of the anchorage basin, and deepening Shipyard River to 38 feet have been authorized. (See table at end of chapter for acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Local interests have fully complied with their responsibility to date but are experiencing difficulty in securing disposal areas for dredged material for continued future maintenance. Terminal facilities. Piers and slips extend for about 1 mile along the eastern waterfront of the City of Charleston with an additional mile of marginal wharves. The South Carolina State Ports Authority operates eight piers for fruit, wood, cold storage facilities and general cargo, a grain elevator and a beltline railway which serves the entire Cooper River waterfront. Modern facilities are also at wharves of seven major petroleum companies including storage tank farms. Modern facilities for marine repairs and servicing are available at Detyens Shipyard, located approximately 10 miles northeast of Charleston on the Wando River. The U. S. Navy Department has modern facilities for construction and maintenance of naval vessels including atomic submarines. Loading docks and storage areas for missile-carrying type vessels have also been constructed and are being operated by the U. S. Navy. For further details see Port Series No. 13, 1970, Corps of Engineers. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: The pipeline dredge Clarendon performed maintenance dredging under contract during November 1980 - June 1981 removing 1,586,984 cubic yards of material at a cost of $1,729,350. The Dodge Island performed dredging in the entrance channel at a cost of $810,953 removing 245,062 cubic yards of material. Contract dike management cost $316,760. Funds of $12,984 were spent for Riverine Utility Craft operation. Engineering and design, surveys, and supervision and administration costs were $609,740. Condition at end of fiscal year. Jetties 7-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY, FY 1981 protecting the entrance channel across the bar were completed in 1895. The existing project was completed in October 1962 except for the national defense portion. Federal costs under the existing project to date have been $3,328,349 for new work and $67,017,291 for maintenance, a total of $70,345,640. 4. COOPER RIVER, CHARLESTON HARBOR, S. C. Location. Cooper River is located in Charleston and Berkeley Counties, S.C., and empties into the Atlantic Ocean at Charleston. (See National Ocean Survey Charts Nos. 11521 and 11524.) Existing project. The major cause of the shoaling problem in Charleston Harbor is the diversion of fresh water from the Santee River through Pinopolis Dam into the salt water of Charleston Harbor, causing density currents which trap sediments resulting in a phenomenal rate of deposition. The most practical solution of the shoaling problem is to redivert most of the Santee River waters above Pinopolis Dam back into the lower Santee River through a canal beginning at Lake Moultrie and extending to the Santee River in the vicinity of St. Stephen, South Carolina. The project for Cooper River as authorized by the 1968 River and Harbor Act provides that the discharge through the existing Pinopolis Hydro Plant be reduced to a weekly average of 3,000 cubic feet per second. This flow will not establish a density current in the harbor. The excess water then impounded in Lake Moultrie will be directed through a new canal above St. Stephen, South Carolina, to enter the Santee River at a point well below the Lake Marion Spillway (Wilson Dam). A new hydroelectric facility will be constructed on the new canal where the ground elevations decrease to become swampland adjacent to the Santee River. This plant will replace those features made less effective at Pinopolis through curtailment of flows. The average flow of 12,600 cfs at the new powerplant, plus the proposed 3,000 cfs average release planned or Pinopolis, will approximate the existing average Pinopolis flow. The three generators at the new plant will be rated at 28,000 kilowatts each, for a total of 84,000 kilowatts. In the interest of fish and wildlife resources of the area, the plan will also provide for construction of a herring lift at the new powerhouse site and a relocated fish hatchery. Estimated cost of the project (1980) is $163,000,000, all Federal. (See table at end of chapter for acts authorizing existing project. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Funds were received for initiation of construction during FY 75. Costs during FY 81 were $682,938 for lands and damages, $1,556,053 for relocations, $879,840 for fishlift, $11,323,511 for power plant, $1,650,827 for turbines, $4,845,417 for generators, $373,947 for governors, $567,292 for transformers, $305,100 for oil circuit breakers, $161,693 for main control switchboards, $121,144 for 480KV switchgear, $135,421 for 15KV switchgear, $179,580 for disconnect switches and busswork, $195,587 for power house crane, $366,552 for intake and draft tube crane, $21,900 for patrol road, $2,806,704 for entrance channel, $3,502,362 for intake canal, $5,298,776 for tailrace canal, $219,320 for cultural resources preservation, and $26,765 for permanent operating equipment. Engineering and design costs were $1,558,207; supervision and administration costs were $1,434,640. Condition at end of fiscal year. Preconstruction planning was completed at the end of FY 74. The General Design Memorandum was completed in January 1972 and work is proceeding on schedule on other phases of the project. Construction was initiated March 1977. The project is 55% complete. 5. FOLLY RIVER, S. C. Location. Folly River project begins in Folly River and Folly Creek north of the Town of Folly Beach and follows a southwesterly course into the Atlantic Ocean. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 11521.) Existing project. The project provides: an entrance channel, 11 feet deep by 100 feet wide extending from the Stono River 1 mile through the ocean bar; a channel within Folly River 9 feet deep and 80 feet wide, extending 3 miles downstream from U.S. Highway 171 to the confluence of Folly and Stono Rivers; and a channel within Folly Creek 9 feet deep by 80 feet wide extending 3 7-4 CHARLESTON, S.C., DISTRICT miles downstream from Highway 171 to the confluence with Folly River. Local cooperation. Requirements fully satisfied. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Total expenditures for engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $54,012. The Currituck removed 37,224 cubic yards of material during August and September. Costs were not billed in FY 81. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was completed in FY 1979. 6. GEORGETOWN HARBOR, S.C. Location. The harbor is located on the coast of South Carolina 50 miles northeast or Charleston Harbor and 90 miles southwest of entrance to Cape Fear River, North Carolina. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 11532.) Previous projects. For further details see page 1806 of Annual Report for 1915; page 549 of Annual Report for 1938; and page 442 of Annual Report for 1944. Existing project. The authorizations provide for a channel 27 feet deep with varying widths of 600 feet to 400 feet from the Atlantic Ocean to and including a turning basin at the U. S. Highway 17 bridge over Sampit River, with a side channel 2,400 feet long and not less than 200 feet wide leading to a turning basin at the upper end of the built-up portion of the city waterfront, a total of 17.9 miles. The project also provides for the continued maintenance to a depth of 18 feet and a width of 400 feet for the bypassed portion of Sampit River opposite the City of Georgetown. (See table at end of chapter for acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Biannual dredging has been authorized, but local interests have not been able to provide the required disposal areas. Terminal facilities. Terminal facilities at the Port of Georgetown, suitable for oceangoing vessels, consist of one marginal concrete pier and one of creosoted-timber construction. For intracoastal waterway traffic there are a number of smaller wharves and landings along the Georgetown waterfront on the old channel. For further details, see Port Series No. 13, 1970, Corps of Engineers. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Disposal area dike management was performed by contracts at a cost of $231,986. Government furnished materials for dike management cost $16,968. The pipeline dredges Arlington and Clarendon performed maintenance dredging in the Sampit River and Winyah Bay by contract October 1979 - November 1980 and August 1981 - September 1981, removing 1,410,957 cubic yards of material with FY 81 costs of $1,937,550. Engineering and design, surveys, and supervision and administration costs were $387,030. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was completed in 1951. The jetties were completed in 1903-04. Federal costs for the existing project to date have been $4,615,903 for new work and $29,898,528 for maintenance, a total of $34,514,431. 7. LITTLE RIVER INLET N.C. AND S.C. Location. The project is located near the North Carolina-South Carolina state line. Little River enters the Atlantic Ocean at Little River Inlet at the state line and affords the only connection between the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway and the ocean along 68 miles of coastline from Shalotte, N.C., to Georgetown, S.C. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 11535.) Existing project. The project provides for an entrance channel 12 by 300 feet across the ocean bar; thence a 10 by 90-foot inner channel to the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway. The entrance channel will be stabilized by jetties extending seaward 3,200 feet and 3,000 feet long on the north and south sides of the inlet, respectively. Emergency dredging on an annual basis was authorized by the Water Resources Act of 1974. Previous work was done under the authority of the River and Harbor Act of 1945, Section 3, P.L. 79-14. Estimated costs of the project (1980) are $16,700,000 Federal cost and $2,720,000 non-Federal cost ($1,570,000 contributed funds and $1,150,000 for lands). (See table at end of chapter for acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. In a letter dated 28 December 1976, the 'Horry County (South 7-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY, FY 1981 Carolina) Planning and Promotion Commission gave assurances of cooperation. Since certain lands to be furnished by non- Federal interests lie in North Carolina, a letter dated 18 April 1977 has been supplied by the Brunswick County (North Carolina) Commissioners, agreeing to provide to the United States the necessary project lands lying in North Carolina. Local interests have met their responsibilities to date. Terminal facilities. There are eight marinas, numerous private docks, and several public boat ramps located in or near Little River, It is expected that existing facilities will expand and new ones will be added as demands for services exceed current capacity. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Expenditures for the jetties and channel contract were $2,104,999; costs for engineering and design and supervision and administration were $368,241. Maintenance: sidecasting dredges Fry and Merritt performed maintenance dredging during May - June 1981 and September 1981 removing 37,666 cubic yards of material at a cost of $154,422. Engineering and design, surveys, and administration costs were $29,795. Conditions at end of fiscal year. Emergency dredging operations are being performed annually until the project is constructed. The initial construction contract was awarded 14 January 1981. 8. LYNCHES RIVER AND CLARK CREEK, S.C. L-ocatio. Lynches-River is a tributary of the Great Pee Dee River, into which it flows at a point about 65 miles above the mouth of the Great Pee Dee River. Shortly above this point, a branch of Lynches River, known as Clark Creek, leaves it and flowing about 7 miles, empties into the Great Pee Dee River about 10-1/2 miles below the mouth of Lynches River. Existing project. The project provides for a clear 4-foot navigation channel through Clark Creek, the principal mouth of Lynches River. Local cooperation. Requirements fully satisfied. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Snagging and clearing was performed by contract for $38,097. Funds of $15,170 were spent on engineering and design surveys and supervision and administration. Condition at end of fiscal year. Snagging operations were carried on from 1888 to 1892 and from 1907 to 1910. Channel is currently clogged with debris and silt. 9. MURRELLS INLET, S.C. Location. The project is located on the coast of South Carolina, in Georgetown County, about 13 miles southwest of the City of Myrtle Beach. The inlet is the ocean entrance through a barrier beach to several tidal streams in the Murrells Inlet-Garden City estuarine area. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 11535.) Existing project. The project provides for an entrance channel 12 by 300 feet across the seaward bar; thence a 10 by 90-foot inner channel to a turning basin at the old Army crashboat dock. The entrance channel will be stabilized by ocean jetties extending seaward 3,445 feet and 3,319 feet on the north and south sides of the inlet, respectively. The recreational project includes a walkway on the south jetty with access road and parking area. Emergency dredging on an annual basis was authorized by the Water Resources Act of 1974. Previous work was done under the authority of the River and Harbor Act of 1945, Section 3, P.L. 79-14. Estimated cost of the project (1979) is $12,700,000 Federal cost and $2,380,000 non-Federal cost ($1,380,000 contributed funds and $1,000,000 for lands). (See table at end of chapter for acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. A letter of intent to provide local cooperation dated 4 November 1975 has been received for the Georgetown County Board of Commissioners. Local interests have met their responsibilities to date. Terminal facilities. There are five marinas and numerous private docks located about the Murrells Inlet Harbor. There are several public boat ramps in the area. Facilities are expected to be expanded and new ones added as demands for services outstrip capacity. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Expenditures for jetties and 7-6 CHARLESTON, S.C., DISTRICT channels contract were $1,147,450, $66,658 for monitoring system contract, $160,204 for engineering and design and $89,068 for supervision and administration. Conditions at end of fiscal year. Advance engineering and design studies are complete. The maximum benefits are achieved with a 10-foot entrance channel and an 8-foot inner channel. The 2-foot depth difference between the authorized depth and the construction depth has been reclassified as "inactive". The entrance channel and the jetties have been shortened to the 10-foot ocean contour rather than the 12-foot contour. The first construction contract was awarded 2 September 1977. The recreational facilities (comfort station and parking lot) contract was awarded 25 July 1980. The project is physically complete. 10. PORT ROYAL HARBOR, S.C. Location. The harbor is located on the coast of South Carolina 57 miles southwest of Charleston Harbor and 23 miles northeast of entrance to Savannah River, Georgia. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 11516.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel from the ocean through Port Royal Sound to Port Royal, South Carolina, 27 feet deep and 500 feet wide across the ocean bar and in Port Royal Sound for approximately 12.7 miles, thence 24 feet deep and 300 feet wide in Beaufort River and Battery Creek for approximately 8.3 miles to and including a turning basin 27 feet deep and 600 feet wide opposite the wharf of the South Carolina State Ports Authority. (See table at end of chapter for acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Requirements fully satisfied. Terminal facilities. The South Carolina State Ports Authority constructed a marginal concrete wharf and operates modern terminal facilities which are considered adequate for present commerce of the port. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design, surveys, and supervision and administration costs were $30,465. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was completed in 1959. 11. SHIPYARD RIVER, S.C. Location. This waterway is a tidal tributary of Charleston Harbor, South Carolina. It has its source about one-half mile below the U.S. Naval Base, whence it flows southerly about 3 miles and empties into Cooper River about three-fourths mile above Drum Island. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 11524.) Previous projects. For details, see page 610 of Annual Report for 1932 and page 463 of Annual Report for 1944. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 30 feet deep from Cooper River to Macalloy, Inc.'s plant, including two turning basins, one opposite Gulf Oil Corporation Terminal and another at the upper end of project. (See table at end of chapter for acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Requirements fully satisfied. Terminal facilities. In the lower threequarters of a mile of the channel are large marginal wharves of the Gulf Oil Corporation and Shipyard River Terminal Company. These wharves accommodate deep-draft, oceangoing vessels for handling petroleum products and fertilizer materials. In the upper channel is Macalloy, Inc.'s wharf for handling ores. For further details, see Port Series No. 13, 1970, Corps of Engineers. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Pipeline dredge Clarendon performed dredging March and April 1981 removing 495,161 cubic yards of material at a cost of $420,887. Engineering and design, surveys and supervision and administration costs were $25,588. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was completed in 1951. Federal costs under the existing project to date have been $487,824 for new work and $7,331,262 for maintenance, a total of $7,819,086. 12. TOWN CREEK, S.C. Location. Town Creek Channel begins at the AIWW directly south of the Town of McClellanville in Charleston County, S. C. The channel follows Five Fathom Creek in a southerly direction to the Atlantic Ocean. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 11531.) 7=7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY, FY 1981 Existing project. The project provides a channel 10 feet deep by 80 feet wide from the AIWW to the mouth of Five Fathom Creek, a distance of 6.2 miles. The project includes an entrance channel 12 feet deep by 100 feet wide across the ocean bar, a distance of 4.0 miles. (See table at end of chapter for acts authorizing existing projects.) Local cooperation. Requirements fully satisfied. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Sidecasting dredge Schweizer performed maintenance dredging during April - June 1981 removing 36,381 cubic yards of material with costs of $201,010. Engineering and design, surveys and supervision and administration costs were $34,046. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was completed in 1975. 13. VILLAGE CREEK, S.C. Location. Village Creek is located on the northeastern end of St. Helena in Beaufort County, approximately 12 miles from the Town of Beaufort. This creek, which is about 600 feet wide at its confluence with Morgan River and St. Helena Sound at a point 7 miles from the Atlantic Ocean, extends in a southwesterly direction a distance of 6.8 miles to its headwaters. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 11513.) Existing project. The authorized project provided for a channel 8 feet deep and 80 feet wide from the mouth of Village Creek upstream to the Porpoise Fish Company Terminal for a distance of 2.2 miles. (See table at end of chapter for acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. All items of local cooperation have been complied with except the present requirement that a diked disposal area be furnished. In the past, a deep water disposal area has been used and may be used in the future. An environmental assessment of these areas is being prepared. If this assessment supports a negative determination for both areas, all items of cooperation will be fully satisfied. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $5,738. Condition at end offiscal year. The project was completed in April 1966. 14. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Costs of $5,369 were incurred for condition surveys on Adams Creek, S.C. 15. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION REPORTS (See Table 7-C.) 16. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATIONS Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 96-645 (Preauthorization). STUDY IDENTIFICATION Calabash Creek, N.C. Fripp Inlet, S.C. Jeremy Creek, S.C. Lakes Marion and Moultrie, S.C. Wards Creek, S.C. FISCAL YEAR COSTS $ 6,103 5,000 21,352 1,261 3,898 Snagging and clearing for navigation (Sec. 3 of 1934 River and Harbor Act, Public Law 14, 79th (Cong.)) Engineering and design, surveys, and supervision and administration costs were $1,361 on Calabash Creek, N.C. Beach Erosion Control 17. HUNTING ISLAND BEACH, S.C. Location. Hunting Island is a state park comprising about 1,850 acres of wooded land located along the southeastern shore of South Carolina in Beaufort County, 16 miles east of the Town of Beaufort, 9 miles southwest of Edisto Beach, and 35 miles northeast of Tybee Roads at the mouth of Savannah River. (See National Ocean Survey Chart Nos. 11513 and 11517.) Existing project. The authorized project provides or periodic nourishment of about 10,000 feet of beach on the northern part of the island with initial placement of 750,000 cubic yards of sand for advance nourishment, and construction of one prestressed concrete groin at the north end of 7-8 CHARLESTON, S.C., DISTRICT the island. Federal participation in periodic nourishment is limited to a period of 15 years. (See table at end of chapter for acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. All requirements of local cooperation have been met by the State of South Carolina and accepted by the Chief of Engineers. The State has contributed 30 percent of construction costs. The initial construction was completed in June 1969, and two additional periodic nourishments (construction) were completed in August 1971 and June 1975. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design, surveys, and supervision and administration costs were $12,660. Condition at end of fiscal year. The first three nourishments were designed to restore the feeder beach to the condition prevailing after the initial beach nourishment. The third nourishment was completed 30 April 1980. 18. BEACH EROSION CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION. North Myrtle Beach, S.C. - $337. Flood Control 19. LEITH CREEK, N.C. Location. Leith Creek is located entirely within the limits of Scotland County, North Carolina. The creek flows through the city of Laurinburg and forms a political boundary between the cities of Laurinburg and East Laurinburg. Existing project. The authorized project consists of 1.97 miles of channel conveyance improvement including replacement of two highway bridges, and relocation of three utility crossings. The project was authorized under general authority contained in Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local cooperation. Local interests must provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, utility relocations and alterations and highway bridge alterations necessary for construction; hold and save the United States free from damages; maintain and operate the project after completion; prevent future encroachments; notify affected interests annually that improvement will not provide complete flood protection; and prevent unwise future flood plain development. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: During the fiscal year, the Charleston District prepared plans and specifications for project construction and coordinated with local project sponsors. Costs during the fiscal year were $5,398. Conditions at end of fiscal year. Bids were opened and project is scheduled for construction in FY 1982. 20. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS To determine the extent of compliance with approved regulations for maintenance and operation, inspections were made of the following projects during the period: Cowpen Swamp, S.C. and N.C., Crab Tree Swamp, S.C., Gapway Swamp, S.C., Simpson Creek, S.C., Simmons Bay Creek, N.C., Saluda River, S.C., Waccamaw River and Seven Creeks, N.C., Todd Swamp, S.C., Buck Creek, S.C., Old Field Swamp, N.C., Edisto River, S.C., Sawmill Branch, S.C., Shot Pouch Creek, S.C., Turkey Creek, Sumter County, S.C., Kingstree Branch, S.C., and Little Sugar Creek, Charlotte, N.C. Responsible local officials were advised of inadequacies in maintenance and operation on local flood protection works when appropriate. Cost for the period was $8,063. 21. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 7-E.) 22. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (Preauthorization). (See Table 7-D.) Emergency Flood Control Activities - Repair, Flood Fighting and Rescue Work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and Antecedent Legislation). Federal costs for FY 1981 were $88,074 for advance preparation and $7,326 for rehabilitation. General Investigations 23. SURVEYS Total cost for the period was $852,169 of which $250,852 was for navigation studies, 7-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY, FY 1981 $547,624 for flood control studies, $38,746 for coordination studies with other agencies, and $14,947 for supplemental preauthorization (Phase I GDM) studies. 24. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Cost during the period was $514,968 of which $303,474 was for inspection of dams, $208,252 was for flood plain management studies, and $3,242 was for hydrologic studies. 7-10 CHARLESTON, S.C., DISTRICT TABLE 7-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT DURING PERIOD See Sect. Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 Sept. 30, 1981 1. Aquatic Plant Control, S.C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 2. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway between Norfolk, Va. and the St. Johns River, Fla. 3. Charleston Harbor S.C. 4. Cooper River, Charleston Harbor, S.C. 5. Folly River, S.C. 6. Georgetown Harbor S.C. 7. Little River Inlet, N.C. and S.C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 8. Lynches River and Clark Creek, S.C. 9. Murrells Inlet, S.C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 10. Port Royal Harbor, S.C. New Work: Approp. Cost Approp. Cost 22,000 10,981 New Work: Approp. - Cost - Maint: Approp. 2,750,358 Cost 3,694,704 New Work: Approp. 250,650 Cost 123,009 Maint: Approp. 2,346,000 Cost 2,765,245 New Work: Approp. 5,355,000 Cost 7,423,915 New Work: Approp. 42,000 Cost 21,412 Maint: Approp. - Cost - New Work: Approp. - Cost - Maint: Approp. 2,343,417 Cost 2,898,753 New Work: Approp. -35,000 Cost 107,463 Maint: Approp. 360,000 Cost 232,238 New Work: Approp. - Cost - New Work: Approp. - Cost - Maint: Approp. - Cost - New Work: Approp. 4,355,240 Cost 4,582,202 Approp. 360,000 Cost 460,000 Maint: Approp. 40,000 Cost 108,276 New Work: Approp. - Cost - Maint: Approp. 804,935 Cost 816,385 35,000 17,272 2,100,000 1,663,475 127,734 2,672,000 2,635,886 15,775,000 15,234,132 265,000 215,922 1,600,000 1,098,931 150,000 124,837 199,000 225,031 4,193,0 3,814,5 260,0 9,0 17,6 45,000 49,174 3,435 2,035,000 2,435,663 7,375,2 7,673,5 32,370,0 32,382,7 -18.0 54,6 2,375,0 2,851,5 124,( 160,3 188,C 299,( - 20,( - 18,F 00 3,075,( 93 2,778,8 )00 660,( - 660,( )00 i31 1 403,000 402,675 594,( 594,t 101,900 128,391 409,000 406,475 52,028 52,028 - 7,455,3781 - 7,455,3781 2,320,000 32,730,3042 2,261,584 32,540,5592 - - 10,165,5643 17 10,165,5643 ?99 4,236,000 68,222,8874 i99 3,479,697 67,419,2804 )00 40,242,000 102,259,583 '78 38,213,576 99,112,289 )00 -1,191 337,736 85 - 337,736 - 176,000 176,000 - 54,012 54,012 - - 7,061,7555 - - 7,061,7555 )00 2,596,000 30,117,0756 i50 2,573,534 30,013,0846 )00 2,480,000 3,819,428 367 2,473,240 3,789,680 )00 200,000 1,540,124 )50 184,217 1,484,045 - 450,000 450,000 - 0 0 - - 9,500 - - 9,500 )00 53,000 83,332 i71 53,267 84,170 )00 370,000 13,594,240 142 1,308,457 13,330,464 )00 - 1,380,000 D00 '154,923 1,274,923 - 701,5697 107 701,5697 - - 1,786,100 - - 1,786,100 D00 32,000 5,892,569 330 30,465 5,891,010 7-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY, FY 1981 TABLE 7-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT DURING PERIOD See Sect. Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 Sept. 30, 1981 11. Shipyard River, S.C. 12. Town Creek, S.C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 13. Village Creek, S.C. 17. Hunting Island Beach, S.C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 19. Leith Creek, S.C. New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost - 62,000 301;056 200,000 202,728 -3,457 630 30,102 33,500 28,335 1 Includes $109,490 for new work for previous project. 2. Includes $69,422 for maintenance of previous projects. 3. Includes $6,586,455 for previous projects and $3,328,349 for the existing project. 4. Includes $401,989 for maintenance of previous projects. In addition, $600 for maintenance expended from contributed funds. 5. Includes $2,445,852 for new work for previous projects. 290,000 362,841 145,000 43,151 405,000 398,634 110,000 212,909 442,000 446,475 253,000 235,056 - 16,000 - 5,738 19,420 512,000 8,000 6,178 200,000 1,293,280 100,000 612,000 1,745 12,660 22,000 5,398 491,9748 491,9748 7,334,192 7,331,262 219,521 219,521 8,600 8,600 883,000 860,591 26,5009 26,5009 106,773 96,511 2,881,117 2,860,713 1,249,336 1,249,336 189,671 167,543 6. Includes $114,556 for maintenance of previous projects. 7. Includes $67,000 accomplished under authority of Section 3, P.L. 79-14 incurred through FY 73. 8. Includes $4,150 for new work on previous projects. 9. Excludes $3,000 in FY 69 for reconnaissance study to determine economic feasibility of modifying the existing project. 7-12 CHARLESTON, S.C., DISTRICT TABLE 7-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents R&H Act of Oct. 27, 1965 R&H Act of Sept. 19, 1890 R&H Act of June 13, 1902 R&H Act of Mar. 2, 1907 R&H Act of Mar. 2, 1919 R&H Act of Mar. 3, 1925 R&H Act of Mar. 3, 1925 R&H Act of July 3, 1930 R&H Act of Aug. 30, 19351 R&H Act of Aug. 30, 19352 R&H Act of Aug. 30, 19352 R&H Act of Aug. 26, 1937 R&H Act of Mar. 2, 1945 R&H Act of June 18, 1878 R&H Act of Aug. 8, 1917 R&H Act of July 18, 1918 R&H Act of Jan. 21, 1927 AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (See Section 1 of text) Provides for control and progressive eradication of water hyacinth, alligatorweed, Eurasian watermilfoil and other obnoxious aquatic plant growths from navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters of the U.S., in combined interest of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, public health and related purposes, including continued research for development of most effective and economic control measures in cooperation with other Federal and state agencies. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA., AND ST. JOHNS RIVER, FLA. (See Section 2 of text) Channel from Minim Creek to Winyah Bay. Channel from Charleston to a point opposite McClellanville. Branch channel to McClellanville. Extending the channel to Minim Creek, thence through the Estherville-Minim Canal to Winyah Bay. Cut across the Santee Delta at Four Mile Creek. Widening and deepening the waterway from Charleston to Beaufort. A waterway 8 feet deep and 75 feet wide from Cape Fear River to Winyah Bay. Construction of bridges across the waterway in Horry County, S. C. Cutoff between Ashepoo and Coosaw Rivers Enlarging the channel from Winyah Bay to Charleston including the branch channel to McClellanville, to depth of 10 feet and bottom width of 90 feet. Increasing dimensions of waterway to 12 feet deep 90 feet wide. Anchorage basin 125 feet wide, 335 feet long, 12 feet deep, near Myrtle Beach, S. C.4 CHARLESTON HARBOR, S.C. (See Section 3 of text) 2 jetties.5 Increase in depth to 30 feet width of 500 feet between the jetties and 1,000 feet seaward thereof. The 40-foot channel to the Naval Base. Act provided that the 40-foot channel should not be undertaken "until the proposed new drydocks at this navy yard, carrying a depth of 40 feet of water over the blocks, has been authorized." This dock was authorized in the Naval Appropriations Act approved July 1, 1918 (40 Stat. L. 725) A 30-foot channel from the sea to Goose Creek via Cooper River, together with a 30-foot channel through Town Creek, for commercial purposes. The act also provided that the 40-foot channel be prosecuted only as found necessary for national defense. Sec. 302, 1965 River & Harbor Act (H.D. 251, 89th Cong., 1st sess.) Annual Report, 1889, p. 1184. H.D. 84, 56th Cong., 1st sess. and Annual Report, 1900, p. 1908 Annual Report, 1903, p. 1133. H.D. 178, 63d Cong., 1st sess. H.D. 237, 68th Cong., 1st sess. S.D. 178, 68th Cong., 2d sess. H.D. 41, 71st Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee, Doc. 14, 72d Cong., 1st sess. H.D. 129, 72d Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee, Doc. 11, 72d Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee, Doc. 6, 75th Cong., 1st sess. 3 H.D. 327, 76th Cong., 1st sess. Annual Report 1878, pp.553-572. H.D. 288, 62d Cong., 2d sess. H.D. 1946, 64th Cong., 2d sess., pt. 1, pp. 21-29, 57, 58 and 61-63. H.D. 249, 69th Cong., 1st sess. 7-13 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY, FY 1981 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents R&H Act of Oct. 17, 1940 R&H Act of Mar. 2, 1945 R&H Act of Sept. 3, 1954 R&H Act of Mar. 2, 1945 R&H Act of Sept. 3, 1954 R&H Act of July 14, 1960 Water Resources Development Act of Oct. 22, 1976 R&H Act of Aug. 13, 1968 Authorized by Chief of Engrs. on Dec. 23, 1977 under authority of Section 107 R&H Act of 1960, as amended. R&H Act of Aug. 5, 1886 R&H Act of June 25, 1910 R&H Act of Mar. 2, 1945 R&H Act of June 30, 1948 R&H Act of 1945, Sec. 3 Auth. by Senate Public Works Comm. and the House Public Works Comm. on Oct. 12, 1972, under auth. of Sec. 201, PL 89-298,1965 FC Act. The 35-foot channel depth from the sea to the head of the project via Cooper River and Town Creek, also a channel in Shem Creek to Mount Pleasant, 110 feet wide and 10 feet deep, including a turning basin at the upper end. An anchorage area 30 feet deep in the water area between Castle Pinckney and Fort Moultrie. 6 Deepen the 30-foot channel north and east of Drum Island to 35 feet. An anchorage area 30 feet deep in the water area between Castle Pinckney and Fort Moultrie.6 Deepen the 30-foot channel north and east of Drum Island to 35 feet. Shem Creek Channel modified by extending 1,150 feet upstream and downstream from mouth to Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway. Project is authorized for the Phase I design memorandum stage of Advance Engineering and Design. COOPER RIVER, CHARLESTON, S. C. ST. STEPHEN PROJECT) See Section 4 of text) divert most of the Santee River waters above Pinopolis Dam into the lower Santee River through a canal beginning at Lake Moultrie and extending to the Santee River in the vicinity of St. Stephen, South Carolina. FOLLY RIVER, S.C. (See Section 5 of text.) Consists of stable all-tide channel 9 feet deep and 80 feet wide in Folly River and an entrance channel at Stono Inlet 100 feet wide and 11 feet deep. GEORGETOWN HARBOR, S. C. (See Section 6 of text) Jetties and earthen dike to protect south jetty. Previous project channel dimensions and training wall. 27-foot channel from ocean, including a turning basin in Sampit River. Cutoff and side channel in Sampit River. LITTLE RIVER INLET, N. C. and S. C. (See Section 7 of text) Provides for an entrance channel 12 feet by 300 feet across the ocean bar; thence 10 foot by 90 foot inner channel to the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway. H.D. 259, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H.D. 156, 77th Cong., 1st sess. S.D. 136, 83d Cong., 2d sess.7 H.D. 156, 77th Cong., 1st sess. S.D. 136, 83d Cong., 2d sess.7 H.D. 35, 86th Cong., 1st sess. H.D. 436, 94th Cong., 2d sess. River & Harbor Act of 1968, S.D. 88, 90th Cong. Detailed Project Report H. Ex. Doc. 258, 48th Cong., 2d sess., and Annual Report 1885, pp. 1154-1170, and H. Ex. Doc. 117, 50th Cong., 2d sess., and Annual Report 1889, pp. 1110-1115. H.D. 398, 58th Cong., 2d sess., and Annual Report 1904, pp. 1591-1609. H.D. 211, 76th Cong., 1st sess. S.D. 21, 81st Cong., 1st sess. P.L. 79-14. 1I.D. 362-2, 92d Cong. 7-14 TABLE 7-B (Continued) CHARLESTON, S.C., DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Water Resources Development Act of 1974 R&H Act of Aug. 11, 1888 R&H Act of 1945, Sec. 3 Auth. by the House Committee on Public Works on Nov. 10, 1971 and the Senate Committee on Public Works on Nov. 18, 1971, under auth of. Sec. 201, PL 89-298, 1965 FC Act. Water Resources Development Act of 1974 R&H Act of Sept. 3, 1954 R&H Act of July 25, 1912 R&H Act of Mar. 3, 1925 R&H Act of July 3, 1930 R&H Act of Aug. 30, 1935 R&H Act of Aug. 26, 19378 R&H Act of Mar. 2, 1945 Authorized emergency dredging operations as the Chief of Engineers determines necessary to maintain channel depths sufficient to permit free and safe movement of vessels until such time as the authorized project is constructed. LYNCHES RIVER and CLARK CREEK, S. C. (See Section 8 of text.) Provides for a clear 4-foot navigation channel through Clark Creek, the principal mouth of Lynches River. MURRELLS INLET, S. C. (See Section 9of text) Provides for an entrance channel 12 feet by 300 feet across the seaward bar; thence 10 foot by 90 foot inner channel to a turning basin at the old Army crash boat dock. Authorized emergency dredging operations as the Chief of Engineers determines necessary to maintain channel depths sufficient to permit free and safe movement of vessels until such time as the authorized project is constructed. PORT ROYAL HARBOR, S. C. (See Section 10 of text) A channel from the ocean through Port Royal Sound to Port Royal, S. C.; 27 feet deep and 500 feet wide across the ocean bar and in Port Royal Sound for approximately 12.7 miles, thence 24 feet deep and 300 feet wide in Beaufort River and Battery Creek for approximately 8.3 miles to and including a turning basin 27 feet deep and 600 feet wide opposite wharf of the S. C. State Ports Authority. SHIPYARD RIVER, S. C. (See Section 11 of text) Channel depth of 15 feet and width of 100 feet. Deepening of channel to 18 feet from deep water in Cooper River upstream 1-1/16 miles. Channel depths of 12 and 20 feet. 28-foot channel from Cooper River to the Gulf Oil Corp.'s terminal, and the deepening of the channel above that point to 20 feet from the depth of 12 above that point to 20 feet from the depth of 12 feet previously authorized without local cooperation. Enlargement of the channel to a depth of 30 feet and a width of 200 feet up to the Gulf Oil Corp.'s terminal, with a turning basin 30 feet deep at the latter point. Extension of the existing 30-foot channel to vicinity of the Pittsburgh Metallurgical Co. plant, with a turning basin at the upper end. H.D. 10203, 93d Cong., 2d sess. River & Harbor Act of 1888, and Annual Report 1888, p. 128. P.L. 79-14 H.D. 137, 92d Cong. H.D. 10203, 93d Cong., 2d sess. River & Harbor Act (H.D. 469, 81st Cong., 2d sess.) S.D. 350, 62d Cong., 2d sess. H.D. 288, 68th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers & Harbors Committee, Doc. 13, 71st Cong., 2d sess. Rivers & Harbors Committee, Doc. 43, 73d Cong., 2d sess. Rivers & Harbors Committee, Doc. 38, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H.D. 93, 79th Cong., 1st sess. 7-15 TABLE 7-B (Continued) REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY, FY 1981 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Auth. by Chief of Engrs. on Feb. 12, 1974 under Auth. of Sec. 107 of R&H Act of 1960, as amended. Auth. on Nov. 24, 1965, by Chief of Engrs. under the Auth of Sec. 107 of R&H Act of 1960, as amended. R&H Act of Oct. 27, 1965 Water Resources Development Act of Oct. 22, 1976 Auth. by Chief of Engrs. on 8 December 1977 under auth. of Sect. 205 F.C. Act of 1948, as amended. TOWN CREEK, S. C. (See Section 12 of text) An entrance channel 12 feet deep by 100 feet wide across the ocean bar a distance of 4.0 miles and a channel 10 feet deep by 80 feet wide from the mouth of Five Fathom Creek to the AIWW, a distance of 6.2 miles. VILLAGE CREEK, S.C. (See Section 13 of text) A channel 8 feet deep and 80 feet wide from the mouth of Village Creek upstream to Porpoise Fish Company terminal for a distance of 2.2 miles. HUNTING ISLAND BEACH, S. C. (See Section 17 of text.) Provides for periodic nourishment for about 10,000 feet of beach on the northern part of the island with initial placement of 75,000 c.y. of sand for advance nourishment, and construction of one prestressed concerete groin at the north end of the island. Extended length of periodic nourishment from 10 to 15 years. LEITH CREEK, N.C. (See Section 19 of text.) Channel conveyance improvements extending a distance of 1.97 miles with bottom widths varying from 35 to 30 feet. Detailed Project Report. Detailed Project Report. H.D. 323, 88th Cong., 2d sess. 9 P.L. 94-587 Detailed Project Report 1. Included in Public Works Administration program, September 6, 1933. 2. Included in Emergency Relief Administration program, May 28, 1935. 3. Contains latest published maps. 4. Inactive. 5. Completed under previous projects. 6. For national defense. 7. Contains latest published maps. 8. Included in Emergency Relief Administration Program, May 28, 1935. 9. Contains latest published maps. 7-16 TABLE 7-B (Continued) CHARLESTON, S.C., DISTRICT TABLE 7C REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY FY 1981 OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS Cost to Sept. 30, 1981 Construction Operation and Maintenance Adams Creek, S. C.' 1978 $125,697 $ 13,908 Aquatic Plant Control, N. C. and S. C.'15 1968 379,680 - Archers Creek, S. C. 1914 20,646 - Ashley River, S. C.' 1955 260,996 525,142 Edisto River, S. C.'. 2 1938 33,103 900 Great Pee Dee River, S. C.', 3 1950 183,712 269,673 Mingo Creek, S. C.1,2 1950 29,050 7,150 Salkahatchie River, S. C.'1,2,4 1896 15,841 - Santee River, N. C. and S. C.' 1950 99,750 178,544 Waccamaw River, N. C. and S. C.' 1978 262,814 272,655 Wateree River, S. C.' 1940 60,000 151,784 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Completed. No commerce reported. Curtailment recommended in 1926 (H.D. 467, 69th Cong., 1st Session). Abandonment recommended in 1926 (H.D. 467, 69th Cong., 1st Session). Pilot Program. 7-17 Project For Last Full Report See Annual Report For REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY, FY 1981 TABLE 7-D FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Preauthorization studies pursuant to Sec. 205 (See Section 22 of text.) STUDY IDENTIFICATION FISCAL YEAR COSTS Brushy Creek, Greenville, S.C. $60,798 Cramerton, S. Fork, Catawba, N.C. 70,614 Eagle Creek, Dorchester County, S.C. 21,583 Free Nancy Branch & Fourth Creek, N.C. 2,097 Gills Creek, Lancaster, S.C. 33,387 Hopkins Creek, Greenville, S.C. 2,970 Langston Creek, S.C. 79,477 Wilson Branch, Cheraw, S.C. 30,566 7-18 CHARLESTON, S.C., DISTRICT TABLE 7-E OTHER AUTHORIZED Project Buck Creek, NC and SC', 2 Cowp~ns Swamp, SC'. 2 Crabtree Swamp, SC1,2 Edisto River, SC' 3 Edisto River, North Fork, SC'. 2 Edisto River, Vicinity Canadays Landing, SC'. 2 Gapway Seamp, NC and SC', 2 Kingstree Branch, Williamsburg County, SC' Reddies River Lake Reedy River, SC',3 Roaring River, Wilkes County, NC1' 4 Saluda River, SC'.,2 Sawmill Branch, SC1.2 Shot Pouch Creek, Sumter County, SC'. 2 Simpson Creek, SC1.2 Todd Swamp, SC'. 2 Turkey Creek, Sumter County, SC',2 Waccamaw River & Seven Creeks, NC and SC'. 2 FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Full Report See Annual Report for 1970 1960 1969 1947 1969 1958 1969 1978 1980 1974 1978 1963 1971 1971 1957 1964 1974 1961 Federal Cost to Sept. 30, 1981 Construction $298,167 18,679 97,000 6,379 127,660 3,160 339,197 247,242 985,800 4,500 370,000 99,000 248,605 77,400 81,000 29,000 319,669 67,821 Authorized by Chief of Engineers. Completed. Discontinued due to lack of interest. Phase I only. Operation and Maintenance 1. 2. 3. 4. 7-19 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT* The District comprises drainage basins tributary to the Atlantic Ocean between Port Royal Sound, S.C., and Cumberland Sound, Ga. and Fla., including the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway between these points. This area covers the headwaters of the Savannah River in southwestern North Carolina, a considerable portion of western South Carolina, eastern Georgia, and a small portion of northeastern Florida. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Altamaha, Oconee, and Ocmulgee Rivers, Ga ................... 2. Aquatic Plant Control .......... 3. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Between Norfolk, Va., and St. Johns River, Fla. (Savannah District) .. 4. Brunswick Harbor, Ga. ......... 5. Savannah Harbor, Ga. .......... 6. Savannah River Below Augusta, Ga. .................... 7. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys ....................... 8. Other Authorized Navigation Projects ...................... 9. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization .................. Beach Erosion Control 10. Tybee Island, Ga. ............... Flood Control 11. Broadway Lake, Anderson County, S.C ............................. Page 8-1 8-2 8-3 8-3 8-4 8-6 8-6 8-6 8-7 8-7 Flood Control (cont.) 12. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ................ t13. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ........................ 14. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization .................. Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 15. Savannah River Basin, Ga. and S.C. .................. 15A. Clarks Hill Lake, Ga. and S.C. .. 15B. Hartwell Lake, Ga. and S.C. .... 15C. Richard B. Russell Dam and Lake, Ga. and S.C. (Formerly Trotters Shoals Lake, Ga. and S.C.) ...... 16. West Point Lake, Chattahoochee River Basin, Ga. and Ala. ....... Page 8-8 8-8 8-8 8-9 8-9 8-9 8-10 8-10 General Investigations 17. Surveys ........................ 8-11 8-8 18. Collection and Study of Basic Data ........................ 8-11 19. Research and Development ..... 8-11 Navigation 1. ALTAMAHA, OCONEE, AND OCMULGEE RIVERS, GA Location. These rivers are entirely within the State of Georgia. (See National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Survey Map of Georgia, formerly U.S. Geological Survey map of Georgia.) For full description of these rivers, see page 636, Annual Report for 1932. Previous projects. Prior projects for the Altamaha River have been adopted, and expenditures made under them, by River and Harbor Acts of March 3, 1881, and September 19, 1890; for the Oconee River by River and Harbor Acts of June 18, 1878, September 19, 1890, and March 3, 1905; for the Ocmulgee River, by River and Harbor Acts of August 14, 1876, and September 19, 1890. * All costs and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. Other tables referenced in the text also appear at the end of this chapter. 8-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 For further details, see page 1815, Annual Report for 1915, and page 589, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The authorized project provides for an appropriation of $40,000 annually for the Altamaha, Oconee, and Ocmulgee Rivers, to maintain a 3-foot depth during ordinary summer low water and to gradually increase channel depth, so far as practicable without sacrificing the maintenance work. This project covers the entire Altamaha River (including a channel between the river and Darien, Ga.), a length of 137 miles, the lower 139 miles of the Oconee River, and the lower 199 miles of the Ocmulgee River. The Altamaha River has a mean tidal range of 6.4 feet at its mouth which gradually decreases to mile 33 above, where there is no perceptible tidal effect. At Doctortown, mile 59, ordinary floods attain a height of about 10 feet above low water, and extreme floods, a height of about 15 feet above low water. On the Oconee River at Dublin the ordinary fluctuations attain a height of 22 feet, and the extreme fluctuations a height of 32 feet, above low water. On the Ocmulgee River at Macon the ordinary fluctuations attain a height of 15 feet, and the extreme fluctuations a height of 25 feet, above low water. There is no approved estimated cost for improvement or for maintenance. Published maps of these rivers are in the following documents: Altamaha River, House Executive Document 283, Fifty-first Congress, second session; Oconee River, House Executive Document 211, Fifty-first Congress, first session; Ocmulgee River, House Executive Document 215, Fifty-first Congress, first session; and Lower Altamaha River and Darien Harbor, Ga., House Document 610, Seventy-seventh Congress, second session. (See Table 8-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Along these rivers there are numerous natural shore landings which are considered ample for existing commerce. Facilities for recreational boats have been constructed in recent years at several points. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: No maintenance was performed during the fiscal year. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project is such that the percentage of completion cannot be stated. Channel depths have been increased by excavating rock shoals and sandbars, by constructing contraction and bank-protection works, and by closing cutoffs. Navigation has been rendered safer by removing obstructions. Many of the closing dams and contractions and bank-protection works need repairs. The final Environmental Statement appeared in the Federal Register October 21, 1977. To September 30, 1981, costs under the existing project were $60,847 for new work and $1,865,351 for maintenance, of which $69,356 were contributed funds, a total of $1,926,198. (See Table 8- A for Cost and Financial Statement.) 2. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL Location. Navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters in Savannah District. Existing project. The project provides for control and progressive eradication of waterhyacinth, alligatorweed, Eurasian water milfoil, and other noxious aquatic plants from navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters of the United States, in the combined interests of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, public health, and related purposes, including continued research for developing the most effective and economic control measures in cooperation with other Federal and State agencies in accordance with report of Chief of Engineers, House Document 251, 89th Congress, 1st session. The authorizing act provides that research and planning costs shall be borne fully by the United States. (See Table 8-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must agree to hold the United States free from damages that may occur from operations performed in connection with this project and participate to the extent of 30 percent of the cost of the program. Requirements are being met. Operations and results during fiscal year. Georgia Game and Fish Division, Department of Natural Resources, who maintain surveillance of potential aquatic plant problem areas, reported aquatic plant infestation in the Satilla River and in other river basins in the State of Georgia. Actual control work under the Aquatic Plant Control Cost Sharing Program with the Georgia Game and Fish Division was not accomplished in FY 81. Certain parts of a proposed new contract were not acceptable to the State. These problems will be resolved early in FY 82. Cost during the fiscal year was $69,207. The final Environmental Statement appeared in the Federal Register August 17, 1979. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) 8-2 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT 3. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK VA., AND THE ST. JOHNS RIVER, FLA. (SAVANNAH DISTRICT) Location. This 161 mile section of waterway connects Port Royal Sound, S.C., with Cumberland Sound, Ga. and Fla. (See NOAA charts 11489 - 11507, formerly Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 838-841, inclusive.) Previous projects. (Between Savannah, Ga., and Fernandina, Fla.) For details see pages 1814, 1821-1823 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 585 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The project provides for a waterway 12 feet deep at mean low water and not less than 90 feet wide between Port Royal Sound,. S.C., and Savannah, Ga.; 12 feet deep at mean low water, with widths of 90 feet in land cuts and narrow streams and 150 feet in open waters, between Savannah, Ga., and Cumberland Sound, Ga. and Fla.; and a suitable anchorage basin at Thunderbolt, Ga. Mean tidal range between Port Royal, S.C., and Cumberland Sound, Ga. and Fla., is from 6 to 8 feet, with fluctuations from 1.5 to 2.5 feet, due to winds and lunar phases. (See Table 8-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Exclusive of adequate terminal facilities at ports of entry, this improvement serves numerous wharves, some of which are open to the public on equal terms. Facilities are considered ample for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: A' contract for maintenance dredging of the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway was prepared at a cost amounting to $59,073. This contract was not awarded in FY 1981. The government cost for condition and operation studies, water pollution and environmental studies amounted to $50,868. Real estate inspection cost, procurement of operating equipment, and administration activities cost amounted to. $31,858. Distribution of Engineer Yard cost amounted to $31,502. The Maintenance Program Evaluation Study was discontinued during the fiscal year. A total cost of $30,325 was expended this FY prior to discontinuation of the program. Total cost for the fiscal year amounted to $203,- 626. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) Condition at end of fiscal year. The main channel of the existing project, completed in 1941, is maintained at 12 feet. The former main channel, now an alternate route through the westerly end of the South Channel and northerly end of Wilmington River, will be maintained to a depth of 7 feet mean low water for traffic points north and south of Savannah Harbor. The final Environmental Impact Statement appeared in the Federal Register October 29, 1976. Costs of the existing completed project to September 30, 1981, were $763,599 for new work and $12,804,778 for maintenance, a total of $13,568,377. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) 4. BRUNSWICK HARBOR, GA Location. The Harbor entrance is 70 statute miles south of the entrance to Savannah Harbor, Ga., and 25 statute miles north of the entrance to Fernandina Harbor, Florida. (See NOAA Chart 11215, formerly Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 447.) Previous projects. For details see page 1818 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 591 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The project provides for a stone jetty 4,350 feet long at the entrance to East River and the following channels: 32 feet deep and 500 feet wide across the bar; 30 feet deep and 400 feet wide through St. Simons Sound, Brunswick River, and East River to the foot of Second Avenue; 30 feet deep and 300 feet wide in Turtle River to the Allied Chemical Co. wharf, formerly the Atlantic Refining Co.; 27 feet deep and 350 feet wide in East River from Second Avenue to its confluence with Academy Creek; 24 feet deep and 150 feet wide in Academy Creek; a channel in Back River 20 feet deep and 150 feet wide from St. Simon Sound to the mouth of Mill Creek; and a channel in Terry Creek 10 feet deep and 80 feet wide from its mouth to a point immediately above the wharf of Glynn Canning Company. All depths refer to mean low water. Mean tidal range on the bar is 6.5 feet, at the City of Brunswick 7.3 feet, and 7.6 feet at the upper end of the harbor. For further details see Annual Report for 1962. Local cooperation. Complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Twenty-nine wharves and piers, almost all privately owned, have a berthing space of 12,226 feet. In addition, the Port of Brunswick and the State of Georgia have a transit shed and modern docks with 1,500 feet of aprons on East River. A tank farm for handling residual oil has been constructed on Brunswick Port Authority's property. For further details see Port Series No. 14, Corps of Engineers (revised 1972). Operations and results duringfiscal year. New Work: Phase I advanced engineering and design for modification of Brunswick Harbor was 8-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 completed and the cost for the fiscal year was $849. Maintenance: The preparation of plans and specifications for a contract for maintenance dredging of the bar channel and Cedar Hammock Range cost $31,917. The contract will be awarded early in FY 82. A contract for maintenance dredging of East River was awarded January 14, 1981. The contract dredge Cherokee removed 266,999 cubic yards of material from East River during the period of January 26, 1981, to February 28, 1981, at a total cost of $349,721 including inspection, administration and other government costs. A contract to raise and repair St. Andrews Island spoil dikes and pipeline ramp and install waste weirs was awarded August 10, 1981. The cost to prepare the contract and begin repairs amounted to $135,194. The contract will be completed early in FY 82. Routine condition surveys, water, air, and environmental studies, inspection and reports, and other essential activities amounted to $117,438. Mosquito control in disposal areas cost amounted to $74,757. Distribution of Engineer Yard and radio communications cost and other year end adjustments amounted to $22,326. Total operation and maintenance cost amounted to $731,353. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was completed in December 1960. General condition of the harbor works is satisfactory, providing maintenance dredging continues. Final Environmental Impact Statement appeared in the Federal Register October 3, 1975. Costs for existing completed project to September 30, 1981, were $30,636,786, of which $3,929,968 was for new work and $26,706,818 for maintenance. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) 5. SAVANNAH HARBOR, GA Location. Harbor entrance is 75 statute miles south of Charleston Harbor, S.C., and 70 statute miles north of Brunswick Harbor, Ga. (See NOAA Chart 11512, formerly Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 440.) Previous projects. For details see page 1810 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 578 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The project provides for a channel 40 feet deep and 600 feet wide across the ocean bar about 7.0 miles; 38 feet deep and 500 feet wide to the Seaboard Coast Line terminal; 38 feet deep and 400 feet wide to the vicinity of Garden City (Georgia Ports Authority terminal); and 36 feet deep and 400 feet wide to the vicinity of Savannah Sugar Refinery of Savannah Foods and Industries, Inc., about 22.6 miles; and 30 feet deep and 200 feet wide to a point 1,500 feet below the Atlantic Coastal Highway bridge, about 1.5 miles, a total length of 31.1 miles; Fig Island and Marsh Island Turning Basins 34 feet deep by 900 feet wide by 1,000 feet long in the vicinity of the Seaboard Coast Line terminal, and American Oil Company terminal; Kings Island Turning Basin 38 feet deep by 1,500 feet wide by 1,600 feet long in the vicinity of Garden City terminal of the Georgia Ports Authority; Argyle Island and Port Wentworth Turning Basins 30 feet deep by 600 feet wide by 600 feet long near Savannah Sugar Refinery terminal and at the extreme upper limit of the project near Continental Can Company terminal; and Oyster Bed Island Turning Basin in the vicinity of Georgia Ports Authority LASH facility. The project also provides for sediment control works consisting of a tide gate structure across Back River; a sediment basin 40 feet deep, 600 feet wide, about 2 miles long, with an entrance channel 38 to 40 feet deep and 300 feet wide; a drainage canal across Argyle Island 15 feet deep and 300 feet wide; control works and canals for supplying fresh water to the Savannah National Wildlife Refuge; and facilities to mitigate damages to presently improved areas other than refuge lands. Mean range of tide is 7.9 feet at the upper end of the harbor and 6.9 feet at the lower end. Extreme ranges are about 11.1 and 10.7 feet, respectively. Latest (FY 81) estimate of total Federal cost for new work modification is $34,219,000 ($11,932,000 for Sediment Basin and Appurtenant Works, $8,660,000 for LASH and Kings Island Turning Basins, $13,400,000 for the Widening and Deepening of Channels and Turning Basin and $227,000 U.S. Coast Guard costs). Estimated local cost for LASH and Kings Island Turning Basins is $2,102,000 and $367,000 for Widening and Deepening of Channels and Turning Basin, and $455,000 for Sediment Basin and Appurtenant Works. Local cooperation. Local interests must provide suitable spoil areas and retaining dikes for construction and future maintenance of the project. The Chatham County Commissioners, as local assurers, have met all requirements to date. Terminal facilities. Fifty-three piers and wharves adequately serve existing waterborne commerce of the port. These facilities, with use of dolphins, have a combined berthing space of 30,154 feet with water depths alongside ranging up to 38 feet at mean low water. Included in the berthing space are three container berths with 95 acres of handling area. All have railway and highway connections. LASH facilities are located 8-4 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT at the entrance to the harbor and have depths ranging up to 38 feet mean low water. The berthing space of LASH facilities is included in the above combined berthing space. For further details, see Port Series No. 14, Corps of Engineers (revised 1972) and Annual Report for 1962. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Activities in connection with Sediment Basin and Appurtenant Works modification and bar channel improvements continued. Under Savannah Harbor Extension, additional engineering and design for the enlargement of the Kings Island Turning Basin cost $37,539. A construction contract for the turning basin was awarded in August 1980, and the cost during the fiscal year' amounted to $1,907,714. Under the sediment basin authority, a continuing contract was awarded March 29, 1972, for construction of the tide gate structure and access road, and the cost for this fiscal year for tide gate amounted to $18,696. The total cost for new work during the fiscal year amounted to $3,534,469 of which $1,963,949 was Federal funds and $1,570,520 contributed funds. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) Maintenance: A contract for the hopper dredges Manhattan Island and Sugar Hill was awarded January 16, 1981 and 865,736 cubic yards of material were removed from the bar channel between February 5, 1981, and March 31, 1981, at a total cost of $1,978,091, including inspection, overhead, and other government cost. A credit of $346,396 was received on the January 7, 1980, contract for work done on the bar channel by these same dredges. A contract for the pipeline dredges Enterprise and Cherokee was awarded February 26, 1981, and 1,303,618 cubic yards of material were removed from the bar channel between March 11, 1981, and May 18, 1981, at a total cost of $1,515,710, including inspection, overhead, and other government cost. Under a contract dated August 19, 1980, the contract pipeline dredge Savannah removed 440,282 cubic yards of material from the upper harbor between October 1, 1980, and October 15, 1980, at a total cost of $83,459, including inspection, overhead, and other government cost. A contract for removal of material from the sediment basin and main channel was awarded July 3, 1980. Contract pipeline dredge Cherokee removed 1,589,325 cubic yards of material from the main channel and sediment basin during the period from September 30, 1980, to December 15, 1980, at a total cost of $366,817, including inspection, overhead, and other government cost. A contract for the removal of material from the sediment basin was awarded August 1, 1981, with work beginning September 10, 1981, and continuing through September 30, 1981. Under this contract the pipeline dredge Enterprise removed 689,266 cubic yards of material at a total cost of $271,900, including inspection, overhead, and other government cost. A contract was awarded November 28, 1980, under which the pipeline dredge Florida removed 1,082,912 cubic yards of material from Savannah Harbor between December 29, 1980, and July 8, 1981. The total cost, including inspection, overhead, and other government cost, was $2,237,682. A contract for maintenance dredging in the Kings Island Turning Basin was awarded August 28, 1980, and the pipeline dredge Enterprise removed 235,777 cubic yards of material during the period from October 22, 1980, to September 30, 1981, at a total cost of $226,527 including inspection, overhead, and other government cost. This work was accomplished during the same period of time that the new work was being done under the same contract. A contract for bank protection for Oyster Bed Island is to be completed in early FY 82. The total cost for the work in this fiscal year amounted to $387,309. A contract for specialized surveying of the harbor was awarded and work accomplished at a cost of $23,464. The Confederate gunboat Georgia, which is submerged opposite Fort Jackson, is being studied under a contract with Texas A&M University. The cost for the fiscal year amounted to $74,774 (total cost to date is $158,792). Mosquito control in disposal areas cost $113,809. Operation and maintenance of the tide gate system cost $254,420. (Credits received from agitation dredging of private shipping interest slips amounted to $96,402 and $1,881 for damages.) Distribution of. Engineer Yard cost amounted to $97,744. The cost for dragging and sweeping for the fiscal year amounted to $220,454. Condition surveys, water quality monitoring, water and air pollution studies, environmental studies, testing, inspection and reports, and government supervision and administration costs were $567,006. Miscellaneous cost amounted to $133,843. Total operation and maintenance costs for the fiscal year amount to $8,108,330. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project is incomplete. Training walls, jetties, and other structures are in fair condition. Authorized channels are maintained by a planned dredging program with work at critical areas when necessary. Final Environmental Impact Statements appeared in the Federal Register January 17, 1975, January 30, 1976, and June 25, 1976. A notice of availability on the Final Supplement to the Environmental Impact Statement appeared in the Federal Register September 25, 8-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 1978, and January 8, 1980. Costs of existing project to September 30, 1981 were $37,099,805 Federal cost and $1,886,413 contributed funds for new work and $108,144,921 Federal cost and $852,858 contributed funds for maintenance, a total of $147,983,997. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) 6. SAVANNAH RIVER BELOW AUGUSTA, GA Location. Savannah River is formed by the confluence of the Tugaloo and Seneca Rivers on the boundary line between South Carolina and Georgia. It flows southeast 314 miles, forming the boundary line between the two states, and empties into the Atlantic Ocean 16.6 miles below Savannah, Ga. (See NOAA Charts 11514 and 11515, formerly Geological Survey maps of South Carolina and Georgia.) Previous project. For details see page 1813 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 581 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 9 feet deep and 90 feet wide (at ordinary summer flow of 5,800 second-feet at Augusta, Ga.) from the upper end of Savannah Harbor to the head of navigation at Augusta, 3 miles above Fifth Street Bridge, a total distance of about 181 miles. A lock and dam is located approximately 15 miles below the upper limit of the project at New Savannah Bluff. Improvement is to be obtained by construction of contraction works, closure of cutoffs, bank protection, dredging, removal of snags, overhanging trees and wrecks, and open-river regulation. Mean tidal variation at the mouth of the river is 7 feet. Freshet variation above the normal pool level (elevation 114.5 mean sea level) of New Savannah Bluff Lock and Dam at mile 187 is ordinarily about 13 feet with an extreme of 34 feet. Latest approved project cost estimate for providing a 9- foot channel (Sept. 1963) is $6,576,000 exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects. Recreation facilities at New Savannah Bluff Lock and Dam cost $17,000. For further details see Annual Report for 1962. Local cooperation. Complied with to date. The City Council of Augusta, Ga., and the Georgia and South Carolina Ports Authorities have agreed to act as local assurer. Terminal facilities. The only water terminals served by this improvement are at Augusta, Sylvania, and at or near Savannah. Augusta provided a municipal dock valued at $50,000 and Georgia Ports Authority constructed a State port at Augusta, Ga., costing about $418,000. These facilities were expanded in 1965 at an additional cost of about $250,000. In addition, Koch Refining Company maintains a terminal below Augusta and Allied Chemical Co. maintains a terminal at Sylvania. These are supplemented by natural landings along the river and extensive facilities at Savannah. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Snagging operationswperformed by U.S. crane barge No. 2 with towboat Tomkins removed 876 snags during the period of October 1980 through December 1980 at a cost which amounted to $105,284. Routine maintenance and operation of the New Savannah Bluff Lock and Dam and its recreational area, which accommodated 229,479 visitors, amounted to $327,702. Routine condition surveys, real estate activities, water pollution and environmental studies, inspection and reports and other administrative costs amounted to $160,192. Dike and bank revetment cost amounted to $58,988. Distribution of Engineer Yard cost amounted to $27,978. Credits received for housing of lock employees amounted to $2,812. Total operation and maintenance cost for the fiscal year amounted to $677,332. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) Condition at end of fiscal year. In general, open-channel works are in good condition. Final Environmental Impact Statement appeared in the Federal Register February 18, 1977. Costs of existing project to September 30, 1981, were $19,947,530 of which $6,646,551 was for new work and $13,300,979 for maintenance.(See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) 7. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS No reconnaissance and condition surveys were conducted during the fiscal year. (See Table 8-C.) 8. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS Operation and maintenance reconnaissance studies were completed early in the fiscal year on St. Marys River, Ga. and Fla., and North River, Ga., and on the Satilla River, Ga., at a cost of $309 and $323, respectively. (See Table 8-C.) The total costs for these studies were $4,990 and $4,992, respectively. 8-6 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT 9. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645, as amended (Preauthorization Studies). Fiscal year costs for preauthorization studies were $231,652. The detailed project study and plans and specifications were completed for Cedar Point, Ga. A negative report was completed on Lazaretto Creek, Ga. Detailed project studies on Bellville Point, Ga., Meridian, Ga., and Valona, Ga., were continued. A reconnaissance study and detailed project study were completed on Torras Causeway, Brunswick, Ga. Beach Erosion Control 10. TYBEE ISLAND, GA Location. Tybee Island is located directly south of Savannah River entrance, about 17 miles east of the City of Savannah, Georgia. (See NOAA Charts 11512, 11513 and 11509, formerly U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 440,1240, and 1241, and on maps included in H. D. 92-105, 92d Cong.) The only portion of the island that has been developed is bounded on the north by the south channel of the Savannah River, on the east by the Atlantic Ocean, and on the south and west by Tybee Creek and other small tidal streams. This area, hereinafter referred to as "Tybee Island," is occupied by the City of Tybee Island. The ocean face of this area has had a wide sandy beach. Tybee Island is about 3.5 miles long from its northerly tip to the mouth of Tybee Creek with an average width of about 0.5 mile. Behind the beach lies a line of sand dunes, a number of which have been removed during the years to make room for improvements and for various other reasons. Those that remain are from 10 to 20 feet high. The ground elevation west of the dunes is from 10 to 18 feet and slopes westward to the salt marsh. Existing project. The approved project plan of improvement provides for an 800-foot rock groin at the north end of the island, with a 225-foot tie-in to high ground. An additional 1,200-foot extension of this groin is deferred, as are two additional, intermediate groins (480 feet long); these will be added at a later date, if needed. Plans now call for the addition of a groin at the south end and modification and rehabilitation of the north rock groin. The plan also provides for the initial restoration of approximately 13,300 feet of beach, from the vicinity of 18th Street to the new terminal groin located at the northern end of the island. Periodic nourishment will be provided as needed to maintain suitable beach dimensions. Local cooperation. Local interests must: (a) contribute in cash the required percentage of the first cost, including costs for construction, engineering, and design, and administration; and excluding the cost of lands, easements, rights-ofway; and relocations; of all items of work to be provided by the Corps of Engineers, presently estimated at 51.0 percent or $4,420,000 (FY'81 estimate) to be paid in a lump sum prior to start of construction or in installments prior to the start of pertinent work items in accordance with construction schedules as required by the Chief of Engineers, the final apportionment of cost to be made after the actual costs have been determined; (b) provide maintenance and repair of the groins, and provide, after the first 15 years of project life, periodic nourishment of the restored beach as may be required to serve the intended purpose during the life of the project; (c) provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and relocations required for construction and subsequent nourishment of the project; (d) hold and save the United States free from claims for damages that may result from construction, maintenance, and nourishment of the project; (e) control water pollution to the extent necessary to safeguard the health of bathers; and (f) provide without cost to the United States access and facilities necessary for realization of the public benefits upon which Federal participation is based, and maintain continued public use of the beach and administer it for public use during the life of the project; and provided further, that construction on the project shall not be started until local interests furnish lands for beach access and parking, satisfactory to the Chief of Engineers, for the reach from 1st Street to the terminal groin. To date, local cooperation is being provided as required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Federal cost of activities during the year amounted to $85,433 and no funds were expended from non-Federal contributions. (See Table 8- A for Cost and Financial Statement.) Condition at end of fiscal year. The final Environmental Impact Statement was filed with CEQ on November 13, 1973. A draft supplement to the Environmental Impact Statement was published in the Federal Register April 14, 1978. The initial construction contract for the terminal groin was awarded September 13, 1974 in the amount of 980,642. The groin was completed and formally accepted on June 17, 1975. The second contract, for initial beach fill and advance nourishment, was awarded June 18, 1975 in the amount of $2,175,000. This resulted in the placement of 2.3 million cubic yards of sandfill along most of the entire length (13,300 feet) of ocean beach front. The sand was removed by hydraulic 8-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 pipeline dredge from a massive sandbar borrow area off the south end of Tybee Island. Completed in March 1976, the project provides approximately 124 feet of beach seaward of the seawall (accessible at average high tide), doubling the public beach area. Erosion has occurred along the beach front. Results of beach monitoring indicate a decreasing or stabilizing erosion rate. The southernmost section south of 13th Street has experienced the most critical erosion. However, the available beach surface for recreational purposes has increased since project completion. Total project cost is estimated to be $8,660,000, which includes $4,420,000 in non-Federal, contributed funds. Costs to date of existing project were $2,522,553 (Federal funds) and $2,024,856 (contributed funds). (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) Flood Control 11. BROADWAY LAKE, ANDERSON COUNTY, S.C. Location. The Broadway Lake is located about 4 miles southeast of Anderson, South Carolina. It is formed at the junction of Broadway Creek and Neals Creek in the headwaters of Rocky River, a tributary of the Savannah River. Existing project. The authorization provides for the Corps of Engineers to undertake a demonstration project for the removal of silt and aquatic growth from an existing lake known as Broadway Lake, owned by Anderson County, South Carolina. This lake has a surface area of about 1 square mile and a tributary area of about 44 square miles with an existing dam and concrete spillway. The spillway is 50 feet wide, about 19 feet high, and flanked by an earth embankment on the west side. The total length of the dam is about 610 feet. The National Dam Safety Inspection Program determined that the dam did not meet the safety criteria. Since the repairs of the dam, spillway, and low-level outlet are not within the authority of the demonstration project, the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers will withhold implementation of the project pending repairs to the dam by State or local authorities. Local cooperation. The local interests are now making the necessary repairs to the dam. Local interests have expressed a willingness to provide necessary easements, and rights-of-way for removal of silt and aquatic weeds, as well as provide lands for disposal areas. They will be required to hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works other than damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors. The United States should be relieved of any liability due to dam failure from construction activity in the lake. The local assurer is Anderson County. Operations and results during fiscal year. The project is inactive, pending completion of repairs to the dam by local interest. The Office of the Chief of Engineers is preparing a Significant Post Authorization Change Report for submittal to Congress. Draft Environmental Impact Statement appeared in the Federal Register August 29, 1977. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) 12. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Physical inspections of the Augusta and Macon levees, Dunn Branch, and Peacock Creek were made during the fiscal year. Cost for the period was $13,414. (See Table 8-A Cost and Financial Statement.) 13. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 8-D.) 14. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (PreauthorizationS tudies). Preauthorization studies on Bay Gall Creek, Ga., and Little Lotts Creek, Ga., were terminated in FY 80. Final coordination was completed in FY 81. The preauthorization study on Trail Creek was terminated. Preauthorization studies on Conley Creek, Ga., and Casey Canal, Ga., were continued. The Pettit Creek, Ga., reconnaissance report was completed and a detailed project study initiated. Reconnaissance reports were completed on Rocky Creek Ga., and Baxley, Ga. The total cost for the fiscal year was $378,588. Emergency flood control activities - repair, flood fighting, and rescue work, (Public Law 99, 84th Congress and antecedent legislation). Revisions to emergency manuals, emergency planning, inspection, supplies, emergency operations, and other expenditures costs were $166,054. 8-8 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 15. SAVANNAH RIVER BASIN, GA AND SC Location. Works covered by this project consist of a series of 11 dams and lakes on Savannah River and its tributaries in Georgia and South Carolina. (See Geological Survey maps of Ga. and S.C.) Existing project. The Flood Control Act of 1944 approved the general plan for comprehensive development of the Savannah River Basin for flood control and other purposes (H. D. 657, 78th Cong., 2d sess.) and authorized construction of the Clark Hill Project on the Savannah River in Georgia and South Carolina as the initial step of this development. The Flood Control Act of 1950 authorized construction of Hartwell Lake under the general plan. Trotters Shoals which will replace Goat Island and Middleton Shoals was authorized for construction by the Flood Control Act of 1966 at an estimated cost of $84,900,000. Clark Hill and Hartwell Lakes are the only projects in the comprehensive plan that have been constructed. (See Table 8-E on Dams and Lakes at end of chapter.) Duke Power Company has completed construction of the Keowee-Toxaway power complex on the Keowee River in the headwaters of Hartwell Lake and construction of the Jocassee pumpstorage power project in the headwaters of the Keowee-Toxaway project. The Keowee-Toxaway power complex is located on the Newry - Old Pickens site identified in the approved comprehensive plan. Individual reports on Clarks Hill, Hartwell, and Richard B. Russell (formerly Trotters Shoals) Lakes follow. Local cooperation. None required. 15A. CLARKS HILL LAKE, GA AND SC Location. Clarks Hill Lake is located at mile 237.7 on Savannah River about 22 miles upstream from Augusta, Ga. (See Geological Survey maps of Georgia and South Carolina.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for construction of Clarks Hill Dam and Lake, the final cost of which was $79,156,300. The dam has a concrete section 2,282 feet long with a maximum height of 200 feet, and a controlled spillway 1,096 feet long. The concrete section is flanked on the west side by a rolled-earth embankment of 2,069 feet, and on the east side by a similar embankment of 1,329 feet. Total length of the dam is 5,680 feet. At maximum power pool elevation 330, the lake covers 70,000 acres. It provides a total storage capacity of 2,900,000 acre-feet allocated as follows: flood control 390,000 acre-feet; hydroelectric power 1,045,000 acre-feet; and dead storage 1,465,000 acre-feet. Seven 40,000-kilowatt generators have a combined generating capacity of 280,000 kilowatts, with an average annual output of 700 million kilowatt-hours of electrical energy. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Cost of recreational activities during the period from Construction General funds (Code 710) amounted to $350,856. Gross generation of electric energy for the period was 465,246,900 kilowatt-hours, most of which was delivered to the Southeastern Power Administration. Flood damages prevented amounted to $472,000. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance costs during the fiscal year amounted to $4,573,710. Condition at end offiscal year. Construction is complete except for providing additional recreational development. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) 15B. HARTWELL LAKE, GA AND SC Location. Hartwell Lake is on the Savannah River 305 miles above its mouth and 89 miles upstream from Augusta, Georgia. (See Geological Survey maps of Ga. and S.C.) Existing project. The dam is a concrete gravity-type structure, 1,900 feet long with a maximum height of 204 feet and a controlled spillway 568 feet in length. The concrete section is flanked on the east and west abutments by earth embankments totaling 13,390 feet in length and by a saddle dike 2,590 feet long also on the west side. Total length of the dam is 17,880 feet. At maximum power pool elevation of 660 feet the lake covers 55,950 acres. Total capacity of the lake is 2,843,000 acre-feet of storage allocated as follows: flood control 293,000 acre-feet; hydroelectric power 1,416,000 acre-feet; and dead storage 1,134,000 acre-feet. Four 66,000- kilowatt generators having generating capacity of 264,000 kilowatts have been installed. A fifth 80,000-kilowatt generator is planned for installation in the future which would then provide a total generating capacity of 344,000 kilowatts. A draft Environmental Statement covering this aspect of Hartwell appeared in the Federal Register April 7, 1978. Latest approved project estimate (Aug. 1968) is $88,300,000. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results duringfiscal year. New 8-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 work: Cost of activities during the fiscal year amounted to $4,448,634. Of this amount $1,104,245 was expended from Construction General funds (Code 710) for the construction of miscellaneous recreational facilities, and $3,344,389 was expended for construction for the additional fifth unit to the power dam. Gross generation of electrical energy for the period amounted to 303,597,000 kilowatt-hours, most of which was delivered to the Southeastern Power Administration. Flood damages prevented during the fiscal year amounted to $166,000. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance costs during the fiscal year amounted to $5,267,740 of which $733,278 was expended on field investigation, study, and remedial work to cut off seepage under two existing diversion dams on the lake. A final Environmental Impact Statement on the operation and maintenance of Hartwell Dam and Lake appeared in the Federal Register August 21, 1978. Condition at end offiscal year. Construction is complete except for providing additional recreational development. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) 15C. RICHARD B. RUSSELL DAM AND LAKE, GA AND SC, (FORMERLY TROTTERS SHOALS LAKE, GA AND SC) Location. Richard B. Russell Dam is on the Savannah River 275.1 miles above its mouth, 29.9 miles below Hartwell Dam and about 374 miles above Clarks Hill Dam. (See NOAA Survey maps of Ga. and S.C.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for construction of Richard B. Russell Dam and Lake substantially in accordance with the recommendations of the Chief of Engineers at an estimated cost of $84,900,000. The latest approved (FY 81) cost estimate for the project is $496,000,000, of which $413,950,000 is for construction, $28,507,000 for lands and damages, and $53,543,000 for engineering and design and supervision and administration. Approval was received January 1977 to include minimum provisions for pumped storage. A notice of availability of a final Environmental Impact Statements covering pumped storage was published in the Federal Register February 18, 1977, and October 26, 1979. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Contracts were awarded during the fiscal year as follows: Georgia State roads (MR 1-2) awarded June 18, 1981; Georgia State roads (MR 1-4) awarded August 21, 1981; South Carolina State roads awarded December 23, 1981; Elbert County roads awarded April 17, 1981; Abbeville/Anderson County roads awarded May 5, 1981; group I cemeteries awarded October 9, 1981; group III cemeteries awarded June 26, 1981; powerhouse construction awarded August 8, 1981; governors awarded July 1, 1981; switchgear and phase bus awarded June 1, 1981; and draft tube gantry crane awarded April 23, 1981. Fiscal year cost for land acquisition and associated cost amounted to $4,307,000. Relocation of Georgia route 72 cost amounted to $5,331,300. South Carolina State roads relocation cost was $2,248,000. Elbert County roads relocation cost amounted to $1,291,000. Abbeville/Anderson County roads cost amounted to $185,000. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad (R-1) relocation cost was $11,383,600, and SCL (R-2) relocation cost amounted to $2,100,000. American Telephone and Telegraph cable relocation cost was $75,000. Carolina Pipeline relocation cost amounted to $208,000. Cemeteries relocations were $119,300. Other relocation costs were $405,400. Concrete dam costs were $18,922,600. Earth embankment cost amounted to $5,480,000. Powerhouse cost amounted to $50,000. Instrument'.tion cost was $91,100. Turbines cost amountea co $4,708,900. Generators cost was $200,000. Governors amounted to $10,000. Switchgear and phase bus cost amounted to $50,000. Cost of the powerhouse crane was $525,000. Draft tube gantry crane cost was $100,000. Transformers cost was $155,000, and all other costs related to dam and powerplant were $128,000. The public overlook cost $21,000. Cultural resources amounted to $1,636,600. The cost for engineering and design and supervision and administration was $8,164,000. Undistributed construction cost for the fiscal year amounted to $451,095. Design memorandums submitted during fiscal year were: Pumped Storage, Water Quality Control System, Access Roads, Moss Cove Study Report, Cemeteries Relocation Group IV, Seaboard Coast Line Railroad Supplement No. 1, Reservoir Clearing and Mosquito Control, Master Plan for Resource Management and Development, and Management Center and Operational Boat Ramps. Total cost for the fiscal year amounted to $68,346,895. Total costs of the project to September 30, 1981 were $205,812,098. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) 16. WEST POINT LAKE, CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVER BASIN, GA AND AL The West Point Lake located on the Chattahoochee River, 2.8 miles upstream from West Point, Ga., was authorized by the Flood Control 8-10 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT Act of 1962 (H. D. 570, 87th Cong., 2d sess.). The project is being designed and constructed for flood control, power, recreation, fish and wildlife development and streamflow regulation for downstream navigation. Design and construction was accomplished by Savannah District for Mobile District. For complete information see Mobile District. General Investigation 17. SURVEYS Fiscal year cost was $1,045,228, of which $315,582 was for navigation studies; $640,315 for flood control studies; and $89,331 for special studies. 18. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Work was continued under the Flood Plain Management Services on the compilation of information on floods, potential flood damages, and identification of those areas subject to inundation. Fiscal year expenditures for these activities were as follows: Guides, Pamphlets, and Supporting Studies, $30,000; Flood Plain Management Services, $83,525, and Technical Services, $115,499. Flood Plain Management Services included responses to other Federal agencies to aide them in fulfilling the requirements of Executive Order 11988 (Management of Base Flood Area). Through the Technical Services Program, flood problems in several areas were analyzed and possible improvements were identified. Throughout FY 81, the Flood Plain Management Services Branch conducted Flood Insurance Studies for the Federal Insurance Administration at a cost of $6,233. The national program for inspection of non-Federal dams cost $626,692. 19. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT No funds were expended for research and development (hydrologic studies) during the fiscal year. 8-11 TABLE 8-A REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 Sept. 30, 1981 1. Altamaha, Oconee and Ocmulgee Rivers, Ga. 2. Aquatic Plant Control (1965 R&H Act) 3. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway between Norfolk, Va., and the St. Johns River, Fla. 4. Brunswick Harbor, Ga. 5. Savannah Harbor, Ga. 6. Savannah River below Augusta, Ga. 10. Tybee Island, Ga. 11. Broadway Lake, S.C. 12. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Works 15A. Clarks Hill Lake, Ga. and S.C. New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 821,457 1 821,457 1 - 50,000 129 47,777 5,000 35,000 7,847 14,619 378,000 333,927 300,000 172,360 1,394,000 1,448,727 -13,300 916,039 9,487,025 9,902,135 1,615,542 1,568,459 175,300 165,373 7,781 5,000 4,528 292,413 144,326 2,631,000 2,634,883 1,145,000 1,149,907 68,000 152,549 2,520,000 2,598,924 86,000 229,272 11,835,000 11,969,503 1,418,400 1,449,937 310,000 203,497 185 22,000 22,393 167,000 398,531 3,002,854 2,507,638 85,000 30,004 863,000 905,951 142,000 184,067 3,612,200 3,588,806 450,000 130,732 6,454,000 5,997,994 1,286,200 1,156,639 95,885 10,000 9,623 374,900 146,287 4,641,000 4,346,877 1 2 1 88 44 - 1,910,182 2,3 - 1,907,945 2,3 43,000 193,359 69,207 144,104 - 958,096 4 - 958,096 4 207,200 12,957,921 5 203,626 12,939,576 5 - 4,573,608 6 849 4,573,433 6 ,261,000 27,317,101 7 731,353 26,761,2327 ,748,000 45,506,721 8 ,963,949 44,360,189 8 ,107,000 108,956,940 9 ,108,330 108,443,815 9 - 6,740,031 10 - 6,740,031 10 542,000 13,349,492 677,332 13,300,979 15,000 2,530,300 13 85,433 2,522,553 13 - 99,000 - 99,000 15,000 81,518 13,414 79,354 200,000 83,064,290 11 350,856 82,976,597 11 1,841,500 36,994,094 1,573,710 35,666,535 8-12 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT TABLE 8-A (continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 Sept. 30, 1981 15B. Hartwell Lake, Ga. New Work: and S.C. Approp. 426,000 488,000 2,043,300 3,865,000 96,280,307 12,14 Cost 147,801 609,505 1,223,614 4,448,634 95,628,946 12.14 Maint. Approp. 2,756,000 3,566,000 4,875,000 4,826,500 34,552,007 Cost 2,745,141 2,664,683 4,709,332 5,267,740 33,689,352 15C. Richard B. Russell New Work Dam and Lake, Ga. Approp. 19,338,000 29,390,000 67,191,000 67,717,000 206,290,500 and S.C. (Formerly Cost 16,734,314 32,532,450 66,838,820 68,346,895 205,812,098 Trotters Shoals) 1. Includes $760,610 for previous projects. 2. Includes $111,950 for previous projects. 3. Does not include $69,356 contributed funds. 4. Includes $194,497 for previous projects. 5. Includes $134,798 for previous projects. 6. Includes $643,465 for previous projects and includes $97,521 expended from Pubhlic Works Funds for existing project. Does not include $10,000 contributed funds. 7. Includes $54,414 for previous projects. Includes $4,995 expended from Public Works Funds for existing project. Excludes $252,557 contributed by Brunswick and Ga. Port Authorities. 8. Includes $7,260,384 for previous projects. Does not include $46,847 for removal of sunken vessels and $1,886,413 TABLE 8-B AUTHORIZIN( contributed funds. 9. Includes $298,894 for previous projects. Does not include $852,858 contributed funds. 10. Includes $93,480 for previous projects. Includes $1,634,562 from Public Works Fund. 11. Does not include $395,634 accelerated Public Works Funds. Includes $3,781,613 appropriated under Code 710 of which $3,693,290 has been expended. 12. Does not include $276,200 accelerated Public Works Funds. Includes $3,330,800 appropriated under Code 710 of which $3,215,782 has been expended. 13. Does not include $2,024,856 contributed funds. 14. Includes $210,000 appropriated for AE&D for 5th unit of which $210,000 has been expended. G LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents R&H Acts of July 25, 1912 and March 2, 1945 R&H Act of Oct. 27, 1965 Section 302 R&H Act of June 3, 1896 R&H Act of Mar. 3, 1899 R&H Act of July 13, 1892 R&H Act of Mar. 3, 1905 R&H Act of July 25, 1912 ALTAMAHA, OCONEE AND OCMULGEE RIVERS, GA. (See Section 1 of Text) Channel 3 feet deep and 60 to 100 feet wide. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (See Section 2 of Text) Provides for control and progressive eradication of noxious aquatic plant growths. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA., AND ST. JOHNS RIVER, FLA. (SAVANNAH DISTRICT) (See Section 3 of Text) Section from Beaufort, S.C. to Savannah, Ga. route No. 2 adopted. Route No. 1 adopted. Section from Savannah, Ga. to Fernandina, Fla. Original 7-foot channel. Provided for Skidaway Narrows. Incorporated alternative routes previously improved as separate projects and the auxiliary channels. H. D. 443, 62d Cong., 2d sess. H. D. 610, 77th Cong., 2d sess. H. D. 251, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. D. 295, 53d Cong., 3d sess. H. D. 295, 53d Cong., 3d sess. H. D. 41, 52d Cong., 1st sess. H. D. 450, 58th Cong., 2d sess. H. D. 1236, 60th Cong., 2d sess. 8-13 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 8-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents R&H Act of Aug. 8, 1917 R&H Act of Mar. 2, 1919 R&H Act of Mar. 2, 1919 R&H Act of Mar. 3,1925 R&H Act of July 3, 1930 R&H Act of Aug. 26, 1937 R&H Act of Aug. 26, 1937 R&H Act of June 20, 1938 R&H Act of Mar. 2, 1945 R&H Act of Mar. 3, 1879 R&H Act of Mar. 2, 1907 R&H Act of Mar. 2, 1919 R&H Act of July 3, 1930 R&H Act of July 3, 1930 R&H Act of June 20, 1938 R&H Act of May 17, 1950 WRD Act of Oct. 22, 1976 R&H Act of Mar. 2, 1907 R&H Act of June 25, 1910 R&H Act of July 25, 1912 R&H Act of Aug. 8, 1917 R&H Act of Jan. 21, 1927 R&H Act of Jan. 21, 1927 Section from Cumberland Sound, Ga. and Fla. to St. Johns River Fla. Consolidation of the 3 sections shown above, into "Waterway between Beaufort, S.C. and St. Johns River, Fla." Section from Beaufort, S.C. to Cumberland Sound, Ga. and Fla. Removing logs and snags from Generals Cut. Improving Back River to provide a channel 7 feet deep and 150 feet wide. Channel 75 feet wide between Beaufort, S.C. and Savannah, Ga. Channel from Baileys Cut to Dover Creek. A 7-foot protected channel around St. Andrews Sound. A 12-foot channel between Beaufort, S.C. and Savannah, Ga. via Beaufort River and Port Royal Sound A 12-foot channel between Savannah, Ga. and Fernandina, Fla. various cutoffs; and anchorage basin at Thunderbolt. Ga. An alternate route 9 feet deep and 150 feet wide in that part of Frederica River, Ga. not now traversed by the main route, at no additional cost to the United States. BRUNSWICK HARBOR, GA. (See Section 4 of Text) Construction of East River jetty. Channels in the inner and outer harbors of 30-foot depth at mean high water, with widths varying from 150 feet in Academy Creek to 400 feet across the outer bar, extension of training wall in East River and construction of 2 spur dikes. Channels 27 feet deep at mean low water over the bar and at Brunswick point; and 24 feet deep at mean low water in the inner harbor and provides for a cut from Academy Creek to Turtle River, if deemed advisable. A channel in Back River 20 feet deep and 150 feet wide. Increased channel dimensions of the bar, Brunswick Point, East River, and Turtle River, as given in the then existing project. A 10-foot channel in Terry Creek. Increased channel dimensions of the bar, St. Simons Sound, Brunswick River, East River, and Turtle River, as given in the existing project. Provides for Phase I AE&D studies for deepening portions of existing harbor (East River and Entrance Channel) and for provision of a na,vigation channel to Colonels Island. SAVANNAH HARBOR, GA. (See Section 5 of Text) Tentative provisions for a 26-foot channel from the Quarantine Station to the Seaboard Air Line Ry. Bridge. Definite provision for the 26-foot channel. A 21-foot channel from the Seaboard Air Line Ry. Bridge to the foot of Kings Island. A 30-foot depth from the sea to the Quarantine Station. A 21-foot channel above Kings Island. Channel 30 feet deep, with general width 50 feet, from the ocean to the Quarantine Station, thence 26 feet deep, general width 400 feet, to the Seaboard Air Line Ry. Bridge, thence 21 feet deep and 300 feet wide to Kings Island. Widening at West Broad and Barnard Streets; anchorage basin; mooring dolphins; regulating dam across South Channel; relocation of the inland waterway; dredging Drakies Cut to 13 feet; widening to 525 ft. at Kings Island; extension of training walls, revetments, and jetties. Consolidation of projects relating to Savannah Harbor. H. D. 581, 63d Cong., 2d sess. H. D. 1391, 62d Cong., 3d sess.1 S. D. 178, 68th Cong., 2d sess. S. D. 43, 71st Cong., 2d sess. Senate committee print, 74th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 6, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. D. 618, 75th Cong., 3d sess. H. D. 114, 77th Cong., 1st sess. Annual Report, 1880, p. 959 H. D. 407, 59th Cong., 1st sess. H. D. 393, 64th Cong., 1st sess. S. D. 57, 71st Cong., 2d sess. S. D. 132, 71st Cong., 2d sess. H. D. 690, 75th Cong., 3d sess.1 H. D. 110, 81st Cong., 1st sess. Report of Chief of Engineers dated Aug. 18, 1976. H. D. 181, 59th Cong., 1st sess. H. D. 563, 62d Cong., 2d sess. H. D. 1471, 64th Cong., 2d sess. H. D. 261, 69th Cong., 1st sess. H. D. 262, 69th Cong., 1st sess. 8-14 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT TABLE 8-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents R&H Act of July 3, 1930 R&H Act of Aug. 30, 1935 R&H Act of Mar. 2, 1945 R&H Act of Nov. 7, 1945 R&H Act of July 24, 1946 R&H Act of Sep. 3, 1954 R&H Act of Oct. 23, 1962 R&H Act of Oct. 27, 1965 R&HI Act of Oct. 27, 1965 SPWC Resolution of June 15 1976 and HPWTC of June 9, 1976 under authority of Sec. 201 of Flood Control Act of 1965 R&H Act of Sept. 19,1890 Channel 26 feet deep and 300 feet wide from the Seaboard Air Line Ry. Bridge to the foot of Kings Island. Authorized the 30-foot project and eliminated from the project (a) the relating dam across South Channel; (b) the relocation of the Inland Waterway; and (c) the further extension of training walls, revetments, and jetties. Deepening the channel and turning basin above the Seaboard Air Line Ry. Bridge from 26 to 30 feet and widening the channel opposite the Atlantic Coast Line Terminals to a maximum of 550 feet for a length of 5,000 feet. Deepening the channels to 36 feet deep and 500 feet wide across the ocean bar; 34 feet deep and generally 400 feet wide, increased to 550 feet opposite the Atlantic Coast Line Terminals, with a turning basin 34 feet deep at the Mexican Petroleum Corp. Refinery; and with such modifications thereof as the Secretary of War and the Chief of Engineers may consider desirable. Extending channel 30 feet deep, 200 feet wide, upstream from Atlantic Creosoting Terminal to a point 1,500 feet below the Atlantic Coastal Highway Bridge, with turning basin 30 feet deep at upper end. Deepening the channel to 34 feet and widening to 400 feet from the upper end of the presently authorized 34-foot channel in the vicinity of the American Oil Company Refinery wharf to the Savannah Sugar Refining Corp. with a turning basin at the upper end of the proposed improvement, made by widening the channel to 600 feet for a length of 700 feet and providing approaches. Enlargement of turning basin near Kings Island to a width of 900 feet and a length of 1,000 feet, with suitable approaches, at a depth of 34 feet. Deepening the bar channel from 36 feet to 40 feet, the channel between the bar channel and Garden City Terminal from 34 feet to 38 feet, and the channel from the Garden City Terminal to the vicinity of the Savannah Sugar Refining Corp., from 30 feet to 36 feet; widening the bar channel from 500 feet to 600 feet, the channel between Fort Pulaski and Atlantic Coast Line Terminal from 400 feet to 500 feet, and the channel between Garden City Terminal and the Savannah Sugar Refining Corp. from 200 feet to 400 feet; providing necessary wideners of the bends; constructing a new turning basin 900 feet wide by 1,000 feet long by 34 feet deep opposite the Atlantic Coast Line Terminals; and enlargement of existing turning basin at the American Oil Company Terminal from 600 feet wide by 600 feet long to 900 feet wide by 1,000 feet long. Providing sediment control works consisting of tide gate structure across Back River; sediment basin 40 feet deep, 600 feet wide, about 2 miles long, with entrance channel 38 to 40 feet deep and 300 feet wide; drainage canal across Argyle Island 15 feet deep and 300 feet wide; control works and canals for supplying fresh water to Savannah National Wildlife Refuge; and facilities to mitigate damages to presently improved areas other than refuge lands. Provided for modification of the existing project to inclhide (1) incorporation of the LASH Turning Basin as an element of the existing Federal navigation project for maintenance purposes. (2) Enlargement of Kings Island Turning Basin to 1,500 feet by 1,600 feet by 38 feet. SAVANNAH RIVER BELOW AUGUSTA, GA. (See Section 6 of Text) For a 5-foot channel. S. D. 39, 71st Cong., 1st sess. H. D. 276, 73d Cong., 2d sess. H. D. 283, 76th Cong., 1st sess.1 H. D. 227, 79th Cong., 1st sess. H. D. 678, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. D. 110, 83d Cong., 1st sess. S. D. 115, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. D. 226, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. D. 263, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. D. 94-520, 94th Cong. dated June 8, 1976. H. D. 255, 51st Cong., 2d sess. and Annual Report, 1890; p. 1328 8-15 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 8-B Acts AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized R&H Act of June 25, 1910 R&H Act of July 3, 1930 R&H Act of Aug. 30, 1935 R&H Act of Aug. 26, 1937 R&H Act of May 17, 1950 SPWC Resolution of June 22, 1971 and HPWC of June 23 1972 under authority of Sec. 201 of FC Act of 1965. Water Resources Development Act of March 7, 1974 Flood Control Act �of Dec. 22, 1944 Flood Control Act of May 17, 1950 Flood Control Act of July 3, 1958 Water Resources Development Act of 1976 Flood Control Act of Nov. 7, 1966 Special improvement by bank protection work of 20 or 25 miles of the river immediately below Augusta. The present 6-foot channel project and Lock and Dam. Provision made for locating the lock and dam at New Savannah Bluff. Conditions of local cooperation modified. Provides for a 9-foot channel TYBEE ISLAND, GA. (See Section 10 of Text) Project will provide for beach erosion control, consisting of beach restoration, groin system, and periodic beach nourishment. BROADWAY LAKE, S.C. (See Section 11 of Text) Provided for undertaking a demonstration project for the removal of silt and aquatic growth from Broadway Lake. CLARKS HILL LAKE, GA. AND S.C. (See Section 15A of Text) Approved the general plan for the comprehensive development of the Savannah River Basin and provided for construction of the Clarks Hill Project. HARTWELL LAKE GA. AND S.C. (See Section 15B of Text) Provided for construction of Hartwell Project. Provided for the completion of the Hartwell Project. Provides for installation of 5th unit. RICHARD B. RUSSELL DAM AND LAKE, GA. AND S.C. (Formerly Trotters Shoals Lake, GA. and S.C.) (See Section 15C of Text) Provided for construction of the Trotters Shoals Project. H. D. 962, 60th Cong., 1st sess. H. D. 101, 70th Cong., 1st sess. Senate Committee Print, 73d Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee, Doc. 39, 75th Cong., 1st sess. S. D. 6, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. D. 105, 92d Cong. P. L. 93-251, 93rd Cong. H. D. 657, 78th Cong., 2d sess. P. L. 534, 78th Cong., 2d sess. H. D. 657, 78th Cong., 2d sess. P. L. 516,. 81st Cong., 2d sess. P. L. 85-500, 85th Cong., 2d sess. P. L. 94-587, Sec. 182b, 85th Cong. S. D. 52, 89th Cong., 1st sess. 1. Contains latest published maps. 8-16 Documents SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT TABLE 8-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION (See Section 8 in Text) PROJECTS Cost To Sept 30, 1981 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Aquatic Plant Control (R&H Act 1962)2 1968 25,700 Darien Harbor, Ga. 1975 199,723 185,433 Fancy Bluff Creek, Ga.'2 1935 8.000 7,200 St. Marys River, Ga. and Fla., and North River, Ga. 1951 15,688 69,926 Sapelo Harbor, Ga.2'3'4 1929 17,906 19,594 Satilla River, Ga.1'2 1951 9,452 57,164 Savannah River above Augusta, Ga.' 4 5 1929 69,600 5,870 Savannah River at Augusta, Ga. 3'4'6 1929 200,556 17,444 1. Channel adequate for commerce. 5. About 84 percent completed. Owing to construction of 2. Completed. 2 power dams which submerged much of the work under the 3. Project recommended for abandonment in H. D. 467, present and former projects, this improvement cannot be 69th Cong., 1st sess. completed as originally planned. 4. No commerce reported. 6. Excludes $185,000 contributed funds ($172,151 for construction and $12,849 for operation and maintenance). TABLE 8-D OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 13 in Text) For Last Cost To Sept 30, 1981 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Augusta, Savannah River, Ga.' 1941 643,016 - Curry Creek Dam and Lake, Ga. 1974 - Dunn Branch, Woodbine, Camden County, Ga. 1977 132,640 Macon, Ga.' 1955 380,043 - Peacock Creek, Liberty County, Ga. 1976 582,163 - 1. Completed. 8-17 TABLE 8-E REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 SAVANNAH RIVER BASIN, GA. AND S.C. DAMS AND LAKES (See Section 15 of Text) Estimated Cost Name River Federal Non-Federal Total Clarks Hill, Ga. and S.C. Savannah $79,156,000 $79,156,000,4 Hartwell, Ga. and S.C. Savannah 89,240,000 89,240,000 Goat Island, Ga. and S.C. Savannah 36,400,000 36,400,000 Middleton Shoals, Ga. and S.C.b Savannah 16,500,000 16,500,000 Chattooga units (4), Ga. and S.C. Chattooga 41,700,000 41,700,000 Tallow Hill, Ga. Broad 39,000,000 39,000,0003 Anthony Shoals, Ga. Broad 18,100,000 18,100,000 Newry-Old Pickens, S.C. Keowee 29,500,000 29,500,000 1. Final cost. (Excludes $127,000 for preauthorization 4. Excludes Code 710 funds. study.) 5. Replaced by Richard B. Russell Dam and Lake 2. Approved Aug. 1963. (Excludes $73,000 for (Formerly Trotters Shoals Lake). preauthorization study.) 6. Site of Duke Power Co. Keowee-Toxaway Project. 3. Approved July 1954. 8-18 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT* With the exception of a small area in the northeastern section of Florida, this district comprises a portion of south-central Georgia and all of peninsular Florida, embracing the watersheds tributary to the Atlantic Ocean and the Gulf of Mexico from, and including the harbor at Fernandina, Florida, to and including the Aucilla River. It also includes Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands. IMPROVEMENTS 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. Navigation (cont.) 33. Other Authorized Navigation Projects .......................... 34. Navigation Work under Special Authorization ..................... Page .. 9-17 ... 9-17 Navigation Page Aquatic Plant Control (R&H Act of 1965 ................................ 9-2 Arecibo Harbor, P.R. ............... 9-2 Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway between Norfolk, Va. and St. Johns River, Fla ..................... 9-2 Canaveral Harbor, Fla. .............. 9-3 Channel from Naples to Big Marco Pass, Fla. ................ .... ........... 9-3 Charlotte Harbor, Fla. ................ 9-3 Cross Florida Barge Canal............. 9-4 Fernandina Harbor, Fla .............. 9-5 Fort Myers Beach, Fla................ 9-5 Fort Pierce Harbor, Fla. ............. 9-6 Intracoastal Waterway, Caloosahatchee River to Anclote River, Fla.................... 9-6 Intracoastal Waterway, Jacksonville to Miami, Fla ...................... 9-7 Jacksonville Harbor, Fla............... 9-7 John's Pass, Fla..................... 9-8 Longboat Pass, Fla................... 9-9 Mayaguez Harbor, P.R............... 9-9 Miami Harbor, Fla.................. 9-9 New Pass, Sarasota, Fla. ............. 9-9 Okeechobee Waterway, Fla............. 9-9 Oklawaha River, Fla. ................ 9-10 Palm Beach Harbor, Fla. ............ 9-11 Ponce de Leon Inlet, Fla. ............. 9-11 Ponce Harbor, P.R................. 9-11 Port Everglades Harbor, Fla.......... 9-12 Removal of Aquatic Growth From Navigable Waters in the State of Florida .................... . 9-13 St. Augustine Harbor, Fla. ............ 9-13 St. Johns River, Jacksonville to Lake Harvey, Fla.................. 9-13 St. Lucie Inlet, Fla ................... 9-14 St. Petersburg Harbor, Fla............. 9-15 San Juan Harbor, P.R............... 9-15 Tampa Harbor, Fla .................. 9-16 Navigation Projects on which Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys only were Conducted during Period ....................... 9-17 *All cost and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 9-1 Beach Erosion Control 35. Brevard County, Fla................. 9-17 36. Broward County, Fla. Beach Erosion Control and Hillsboro Inlet, Fla., Navigation Project ......... 9-18 37. Dade County, Fla .................... 9-19 38. Duval County, Fla. .................. 9-19 39. El Tuque Beach, P.R................. 9-19 40. Fort Pierce, Fla. ..................... 9-20 41. Manatee County, Fla.............. 9-20 42. Palm Beach County, Fla. from Martin County line to Lake Worth Inlet and from South Lake Worth Inlet to Broward County line .......... 9-21 43. Pinellas County, Fla. ............... 9-21 44. Punta Salinas, P.R. ................... 9-21 45. Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects ..................... 9-22 46. Beach Erosion Control Activities under Special Authorization ........... 9-22 Flood Control 47. Central and Southern Florida .......... 9-22 48. Four River Basins, Fla. ............. 9-24 49. Portugues and Bucana Rivers, P.R ...... 9-24 50. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ..................... 9-25 51. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ............................ 9-25 52. Flood Control Work under Special Authorization ....................... 9-25 General Investigations 53. Surveys ............................ 9-25 54. Collection and Study of Basic Data ...... 9-25 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 Navigation 1. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (R&H ACT OF 1965) Location. Navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters in Florida. Existing project. The authorized project provides for control and progressive eradication of water hyacinth, alligatorweed, Eurasian watermilfoil, and other obnoxious aquatic plant growths from navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters of the United States, in combined interest of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, public health, and related purposes, including continued research for development of most effective and economical control measures in cooperation with other Federal and State agencies in accordance with report of Chief of Engineers, House Document 251, 89th Congress, 1st session. The authorizing act provides that research and planning costs shall be borne fully by the United States. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must hold the United States free from damages that may occur from operations performed in connection with this project and contribute 30 percent of cost of operations. Compliance with requirements of local cooperation is on schedule. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: There were 7,704 acres of hyacinth, 6,063 acres of hydrilla, 1,141 acres of minor plant and 1,786 acres of hyacinth and waterlettuce mix controlled during the period. Costs incurred were $261,236 for engineering and $1,816,525 for operations. Condition at end of fiscal year. Operations by the Corps and the State of Florida are in progress, water hyacinths within Florida are under maintenance control. Hydrilla is continuing to spread throughout the state and is causing major problems in some areas. 2. ARECIBO HARBOR, P. R. Location. The harbor is located on the north shore of Puerto Rico about 40 miles west of San Juan Harbor. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 903.) Previous project. For details see page 504 of 1956 Annual Report. Existing project. The project provides for a channel 25 feet deep and 400 feet wide, with flare at entrance and widening at inner end to form a maneuvering area, and a stone breakwater 1,200 feet long. Place of reference is mean low water. Mean tidal range is 1.1 feet. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Non Federal contribution for new work was $288,000. Terminal facilities. A bulkhead wharf 688 by 220 feet providing a deep water berthing space of approximately 500 feet, and a 300 by 100 foot transit shed. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and operation studies for the year cost $13,745. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $16,322 and $1,105 respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was completed in 1944. Breakwater was repaired in 1952. Wave action has since caused minor damage. Total Federal costs under existing project through September 30, 1981 were $1,128,075 for new work and $1,140,809 for maintenance, a total of $2,265,884. 3. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA. AND ST. JOHNS RIVER, FLA. (JACKSONVILLE DISTRICT) Location. That part of Intracostal Waterway between southerly limit of Fernandina Harbor, Florida, at junction of Lanceford Creek and Amelia River, and St. Johns River, Fla. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 841-SC.) Previous project. For Details see page 605 of 1938 Annual Report. Existing project. Channel 12 by 90 to 150 feet from Fernandina Harbor to St. Johns River about 22 miles long. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean tidal range is 6 feet at Fernandina and 3.8 feet at St. Johns River. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Existing project was authorized by River and Harbor Acts of 1913 (HD 898/62/2) and 1938 (HD 618/75/3). Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. There is a commercial marina located at Sisters Creek. No other facilities exist along this section of the waterway and none are currently required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and operation studies for the year cost $21,115. Engineering and design and supervision and administrative costs were $101,254 and $4,435, respectively. 9-2 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was completed in 1941. Total costs under the existing project to September 30, 1981, have been $263,659 for new work and $1,646,644 for maintenance, a total of $1,910,303. 4. CANAVERAL HARBOR, FLA. Location. The harbor is located on the east coast of Florida in Canaveral Bight, about 146 miles south of the entrance to Jacksonville Harbor and 69 miles north of the entrance to Fort Pierce Harbor. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 456 and 1245.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for maintenance of the 37-foot and 36-footdepth entrance channel and 35-foot-depth turning basin; construction and operation of a sand transfer plant; relocation of the perimeter dike about 4,000 feet westward and extension of the harbor westward; two entrance jetties 100 feet long (constructed of native stone core and granite sides and cap); a lock; a channel and turning basin 31 feet deep near the relocated dike; and a barge canal 12 by 125 feet from the turning basin to the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway. Plane of reference is mean low water (ocean) for harbor dike and lock, and mean low water (Banana River) for barge canal. The project is about 11.5 miles long. Mean tidal range is 3.5 feet at the entrance and practically non-tidal in Banana and Indian Rivers. (See Table 9-C for Data Relative to Lock.) Estimated cost (Oct. 1980 price levels) of the 1962 modification to the project is $20,900,000 Federal cost and $1,174,000 non-Federal cost ($265,000 contributed funds and $909,000 other costs); $700,000 costs to NASA and $38,000 costs to U.S. Coast Guard. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must: provide all lands, rights-of-way, spoil-disposal areas, retaining dikes, and embankments; hold United States free from damages; provide and maintain four-lane bridge and roadway subject to Federal contribution of 65.3 percent of cost of constructing bridge and 51.2 percent of constructing roadway; provide public terminal and transfer facilities; and make alterations as required in berthing facilities. For further details see Senate Document 140, 87th Congress, 2d session. Non- Federal contribution for new work is $289,000. Terminal facilities. On the south side of the port, there is a 1,060-foot marginal wharf supported by 108,000 square feet of general cargo warehouse space and 60,000 square feet of freezer warehouse space. An additional 40,000 square foot freezer warehouse is under construction. Drafts along the wharf are 35 feet at the east end and 31 feet at the west end. Two tanker berths on the south side are utilized for bunkers, petroleum products offloading and bulk cement. Draft is 35 feet at both piers. A 41-foot-draft liquid and dry bulk facility is also located on the south side. The north side has three general cargo wharves totalling 1,240 linear feet, with 35-foot draft at all three. These facilities are used for general caro, fresh citrus, scrap, passenger vessels and lay berths for military vessels. Another bulk cement facility is located on the north side. Although existing facilities are adequate at present, rapid commercial expansion in the area will soon require the construction of additional facilities. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Maintenance and operation of locks amounted to $331,705 for the fiscal year. Operation and maintenance of district communications network cost $15,713. Condition and operation studies for the year cost $70,555. Dredging by contract from October 1980 to January 1981, of the Canaveral Harbor turning basin and the U.S. Navy Trident Areas Channel amounted to $1,663,627. Dredging of the Canaveral Harbor Entrance Channel by the Dredge McFarland during the period 17 August 1981 to 22 September 1981 amounted to $1,106,112. Costs for the Sea Turtle task force were $79,704. Cost for operation of service facilities amounted to $24,186. Hired labor surveys, inspections and reports cost $4,047. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were - $8,240 and $180,921 respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project is about 50 percent completed. The perimeter dike and jetties are in good condition. Work remaining to complete the project is completion of the harbor extension and construction of the sand transfer plant. 5. CHANNEL FROM NAPLES TO BIG MARCO PASS, FLA. Location. Naples Bay is on the southwestern side of the Florida peninsula about 35 miles south of the mouth of the Caloosahatchee River and approximately 1 mile inland and parallel to the Gulf of Mexico coastline. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 1254.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for an interior channel 6 by 70 feet from Naples to Big Marco Pass; a channel 12 by 150 feet from the Gulf of Mexico to Gordon Pass, thence 10 by 100-70 feet to a 10-foot-depth turning 9-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 basin in the upper Naples Bay; and an 8-footdepth turning basin at the municipal yacht basin. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean tidal range is 2.1 feet. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) For further details see Annual Report of 1962. Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Contributed funds for new work were $159,975. Terminal facilities. Four seafood packing houses, 4 marine repair yards; a municipal pier and basin for use by recreational boats; and numerous private piers and slips for both commercial and recreational craft are available. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging cost $218. Hired labor surveys, inspections and reports cost $3,131. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $3 and $2,279 respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is complete. 6. CHARLOTTE HARBOR, FLA. Location. The Harbor is located on the west coast of Florida about 68 miles south of the entrance to Tampa Bay and 150 miles north of Key West. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 1255.) Previous projects. For details, see page 457 of 1959 Annual Report. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 32 by 300 feet, increased to 700 feet at the bend, from the Gulf of Mexico to Port Boca Grande, thence 10 by 100 feet from deep water at Port Boca Grande to and including a turning basin 200 feet square at the municipal terminal at Punta Gorda. Plane of reference is mean low water. The project is about 29.5 miles long. Mean tidal range is one foot at Port Boca Grande and 1.4 feet at Punta Gorda. Extreme range is about 3 feet at Port Boca Grande and 3.8 feet at Punta Gorda. Strong southwesterly winds raise water level about 1.5 feet; strong northerly and easterly winds lower it about one foot. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local cooperation is fully complied with to date. Non-Federal contribution for new work was $15,563. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities consist of a phosphate wharf at Port Boca Grande and a municipal earthfill pier about 850 feet long at Punta Gorda, both open to the public. Railway connections are available at Port Boca Grande, and highway and railway connections are available at Punta Gorda. There is a tank farm at Port Boca Grande for storage and rehandling of bunker fuel oil and numerous facilities are available in the area for docking and servicing small craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging by the Dredge McFarland amounted to $637,683. Operation and maintenance of district communications network cost $5,868. Condition and operation studies cost $4,652. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $58,544 and $51,251 respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in 1959. Total costs under existing project through September 30, 1981, have been $533,169 for new work and $5,884,259 for maintenance, a total of $6,304,428. In addition, $15,563 was expended from contributed funds for new work in Boca Grande entrance channel. 7. CROSS FLORIDA BARGE CANAL Location. The proposed canal extends up the St. Johns River, past Palatka, thence up the valley of the Oklawaha River across the divide south of Ocala, and down the valley of the Withlacoochee River to the Gulf of Mexico, about 95 miles north of Tampa, Florida. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a lock canal with project depth of 12 feet and a minimum bottom width of 150 feet, with five locks and two earth dams. Project including the section in the St. Johns River is 184 miles long. (See Table 9-D for Locks and Dams.) Operation and maintenance of the locks and dams is a Federal responsibility. Estimated cost of new work (1970) is $179,000,000 Federal, and $19,500,000 non-Federal for lands, rights-of-way, and other costs. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must furnish lands and rights-of-way for construction of canal; hold the United States free from damages; and operate and maintain all highway bridges and roadways built in connection with project. Terminal facilities. None. Operations and results during fiscal year. (See Table 9-E for work accomplished.) Regulation. a. Lake Ocklawaha. During the period the lake S9-4 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT continued to be regulated at 18.0 feet, m.s.l. by discharging through the Rodman spillway. The only exception was a winter drawdown of the lake from 18 ft. to 14 ft. to reduce the volume of noxious aquatic vegetation in the lake. b. Lake Rousseau. During the period, the lake continued to be regulated at 27.5 ft., m.s.l., by discharging through the Inglis Bypass Spillway. It was not necessary to supplement releases from the bypass spillway with additional releases from the Inglis Dam spillway for regulatory purposes. Daily discharges were initiated at the Inglis Dam spillway at weekly intervals to improve water quality in the reservoir. However, due to a lack of inflow, it has been necessary to reduce these periodic discharges to as low as 10 cfs. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of project commenced February 25, 1964, and is 36 percent completed. Inglis Lock, Dam, and Spillway; Rodman Dam and Spillway, Eureka Lock, Dam, and Spillway; Henry H. Buckman Lock; and canal from Palatka to Lake Ocklawaha and from Withlacoochee River to Gulf of Mexico, including Inglis Bypass Channel, are completed. Construction work on the project was terminated in FY 1971 by order of the President. A restudy report and environmental impact statement were completed in February 1977. 8. FERNANDINA HARBOR, FLA. Location. Entrance to the harbor is located on the northeast coast of Florida about 95 miles south of the entrance to Savannah Harbor, Georgia, and 22 miles north of the entrance to Jacksonville Harbor, Florida. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 453.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a 32-foot-depth channel (maximum channel in active status: 28 feet) generally 300-400 feet wide from deep water in the ocean to the junction of Lanceford Creek with Amelia River; an 800-foot-wide turning basin at the first bend below Lanceford Creek; and two jetties, 19,150 and 11,200 feet long. Plane of reference is mean low water. The project is 7 miles long. Mean tidal range is 5.8 feet on the bar and 6 feet in the inner harbor. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. There are two large wharves operated by industrial plants; twelve wharves serving fishing boats, recreational craft, and other vessels; three oil handling wharves with pipelines; and a Municipal Marina and Sportsman's Wharf with public facilities for small craft. Total berthing space is approximately 4,065 feet. Most terminals are served by rail, and all have highway access. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 16 (Part 2), 1964.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Contract work for the Ft. Clinch Fishing Pier Recreation Facilities was completed in October 1980 with costs of $91,180. Engineering and design and supervision and administration of recreational facilities at Fort Clinch incurred costs of - $4,066 and $5,510 respectively. Maintenance: Dredge MacFarland removed material from 5 May 1981 to 9 July 1981 in Fernandina Harbor, and by Dredge Davison in the inner channel and Turning Basin from 12 November 1980 to 23 February 1981, cost $3,889,990. Condition and operation studies cost $73,604. Operation and maintnenace of district communications net work cost $4,466. Costs for the sea turtle task force were $15,000. Hired labor surveys, inspections and reports cost $39,536. Engineering and design costs and supervision and administration costs were $8,633 and $5,846, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. The active portion of the existing project is complete. Jetties are in poor condition and are badly in need of repair. Remaining work is to deepen the inner harbor channel and turning basin to 32 feet when and if the presently inactive 1950 authorization is reactivated. The outer harbor channel has been deepened to 34 feet in development of a military project. 9. FORT MYERS BEACH, FLA. Location. Fort Myers Beach is on Estero Island near the mouth of the Caloosahatchee River, about 20 miles below Fort Myers and 110 miles south of Tampa, Florida. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 855-SC and 1255.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 12 by 150 feet from that depth in San Carlos Bay into Matanzas Pass, thence 11 by 125 feet in Matanzas Pass to and including a turning basin 2,000 feet upstream from the upper shrimp terminals. Plane of reference is mean low water. Project is 2.5 miles long. Mean tidal range is 1.7 feet. Spring range is about 2.3 feet. Strong northerly winds lower the water surface 1 to 2 feet; strong southerly winds have an opposite effect. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Non-Federal contribution for new work was $1,095. Terminal facilities. There are three shrimppacking houses and several fish-packing houses, two marine railways, a fuel terminal and an ice 9-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 manufacturing plant in the area. There are several commercial facilities for servicing shrimp boats. Recreational-craft facilities include nine marinas, a boat and motor testing laboratory, and numerous privately owned piers and wharves. All terminals have highway access. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging surveys and inspection were performed at a cost of $4,403. Supervision and administration costs were $890. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is complete. 10. FORT PIERCE HARBOR, FLA. Location. On east coast of Florida, about 218 miles south of entrance to St. Johns River and about 124 miles north of entrance to Miami Harbor. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 582.) Existing project. A channel 350 feet wide at the 27-foot contour in the ocean, tapering to a width of 200 feet at Sta. 100 + 00, thence 200 feet wide to Sta. 30 + 00, and thence flaring to a turning basin 900 feet wide. Entrance channel is 27 feet deep to Sta. 130 + 00 and thence 25 feet deep to and including the turning basin. Project includes the maintenance of two jetties and shore revetments at the inlet. Length of project is about 3.5 miles. Mean tidal range is 2.6 feet at the entrance and 0.7 foot at terminals. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) For further details see 1961 Annual Report. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Non-Federal contribution for new work was $18,574. Terminal facilities. Two earth-filled piers forming a slip 200 feet by 300 feet, with bulkhead wharf at inner end, affording berthing space of about 1,653 feet. The south pier and bulkhead wharf are municipally owned. Facilities also include a cooling plant, a warehouse and a fruit packing house. The north pier is served by railway and both piers by highway connnections. North of the turning basin local interests have provided deep-draft berthing and pier facilities. Also available is a bulkhead wharf with a depth of 20 feet with ample room for open storage and with tank storage for petroleum in the rear. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintnenace: Condition and operation studies cost $35,941. Costs for the sea turtle task force were $35,000. Dredging by contract cost $76,189. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $21,376 and $1,310 respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in 1938 except for the fishing walkway atop the south jetty which was completed by local interest in 1968. Local interests installed lighting atop the jetty in 1969. Jetties and revetments are in good condition. 11. INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, CALOOSAHATCHEE RIVER TO ANCLOTE RIVER, FLA. Location. The Waterway extends from the mouth of the Caloosahatchee River at Punta Rassa, Florida, to the mouth of Anclote River, Florida, following in general an almost continuous series of protected inside waterways along the gulf coast of Florida. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 856-SC, 857-SC, and 858.) Previous projects. For details see page 767 of 1945 Annual Report. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 9 by 100 feet from Caloosahatchee River to Anclote River; deepening the existing channel at Caseys Pass to 9 feet; a channel 6 by 80 feet (Cats Point Channel) along the southeastern side of Boca Ciega Bay past Frenchman Creek and Gulfport; maintenance of bulkheads, revetments, and two jetties built at Caseys Pass under previous project; and improvement and maintenance of Sunshine Skyway Channel. Plane of reference is mean low water. The project includes about 160 miles of channels. Mean ranges of tide are 1.7 feet at Punta Rassa, 1 foot at Port Boca Grande, 1.4 feet in Tampa Bay at Anna Maria, and 2 feet at entrance to Anclote River. Extreme ranges are about 4.5 feet at Punta Rassa, about 3 to 4 feet between Port Boca Grande and Corey Causeway over Boca Ciega Bay, and about 5.5 feet at entrance to Anclote River. Southerly winds over the area generally raise water level by 1 to 1.5 feet; northerly winds lower water level by 1 to 2 feet. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Non-Federal contribution for constructing Cats Point and Sunshine Skyway Channels was $9,707 and $4,766, respectively. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities include one municipal concrete pier, one railway pier, one freight wharf, one marginal wharf 500 feet long on terminal island, and eleven privately owned landings, all at Sarasota. Municipal pier and freight wharf are open to the public. All piers have highway connections. There are six wharves 9-6 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT along Boca Ciega Bay and a number of small privately owned piers and wharves at various points along waterway for use of commercial fishing boats and recreational craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Real estate management cost $2,933. Maintenance of channel slopes and berms was performed by hired labor for $4,496. Operation and maintenance of district communications network cost $5,868. Condition and operation studies cost $34,797. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $886 and $6,645, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project is complete. Jetties at Caseys Pass were maintained in F.Y. 80. Total Federal costs under existing project through September 30, 1981 were $7,597,078 for new work and $4,203,250 for maintenance, a total of $11,800,328. In addition, $14,473 contributed funds were expended for Sunshine Skyway and Boca Ciega Bay channels. 12. INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, JACKSONVILLE TO MIAMI, FLA. Location. The waterway extends from Jacksonville to Miami, Florida, following the St. Johns River to the mouth of Pablo Creek and thence following in general an almost continuous series of protected inside waterways along the Atlantic coast of Florida to Miami. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 841-SC, 843-SC, 845-SC, and 847-SC.) Previous projects. For details, see pages 618-619 of 1938 Annual Report. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 12 by 125 feet from Jacksonville to Miami, modified to 10-foot-depth from Fort Pierce to Miami by Chief of Engineer's report of July 22, 1960; side channels at Sebastian and Daytona Beach and turning basins at Sebastian and Vero Beach, all to an 8-foot-depth; and operation and maintenance of the Palm Valley highway bridge. Project is 370 miles long, including 21 miles in Jacksonville Harbor. Mean range of the tide is 3.8 feet at St. Johns River, 0.7 foot in the Indian River at Fort Pierce, 1.8 feet in Lake Worth at Port of Palm Beach terminals, 2.3 feet at the Port Everglades terminals, and 2 feet in Biscayne Bay. The extreme range is about 7 feet at St. Johns River, 1.5 feet at Fort Pierce, and 3 feet in Biscayne Bay. Plane of reference is mean low water. Tidal effect is imperceptible at points along waterway distant from inlets. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. There are a number of privately owned piers, wharves, and landings at various points along waterway. Terminals with railway connections are available at Jacksonville, Fort Pierce, West Palm Beach, Port Everglades, and Miami. Municipal piers or wharves have been constructed at Titusville, Cocoa, Melbourne, and Vero Beach for handling general freight and at St. Augustine, Daytona Beach, New Smyrna Beach, Eau Gallie, West Palm Beach, Delray Beach, Fort Lauderdale, and Miami for use of recreational craft. Yacht basins, open to the public, have been provided at Jacksonville Beach, Daytona Beach, Titusville, Eau Gallie, Vero Beach, Fort Pierce, West Palm Beach, Fort Lauderdale, Hollywood, and Miami. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (For further details on facilities at Jacksonville, see Port Series No. 15, 1969, and at Palm Beach, Port Everglades, and Miami, see Port Series No. 16, Revised 1972.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: The cost of contract dredging was $277,233. Operation and maintenance of the district communications network cost $10,497. Condition and operation studies cost $168,501. Real estate management cost $15,362. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $3,124 and $107,741, respectively. Hired labor surveys, inspections and reports cost $108,718. Operation and care: The highway bridge near Palm Valley was operated and maintained at a cost of $67,908. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project as modified by the Chief of Engineers is complete except for construction of the channel and turning basin at Sebastian, Florida, which is in an inactive status. Total Federal costs under existing project through September 30, 1981, were $16,956,271 for new work: $20,607,681 for maintenance and $1,354,751 for operation and care, a total of $38,918,703, regular funds. In addition, $2,199,842 has been expended from public works funds for new work. 13. JACKSONVILLE HARBOR, FLA. Location. The authorized project comprises the lower 24.9 miles of St. Johns River which empties into the Atlantic Ocean near the northeasterly corner of the Florida peninsula. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 636-SC.) Previous projects. For details, see page 607 of Annual Report, 1938. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 38 by 400 -1,200 feet from the 9-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 ocean to mile 20 via Dame Point - Fulton Cutoff, thence 34 feet to Commodore Point, and thence 30 feet deep to the F.E.C. Railway bridge at Jacksonville, including a 30-foot channel in Arlington Cut and in the Old Dame Point-Fulton Channel; maintenance of the existing 42 and 40-foot-depth entrance channel; maintenance of jetties at channel entrance; and construction of training walls and revetments. Plane of reference is mean low water. The project is about 26.8 miles long. Mean tidal range is 5.3 feet on the bar, 4.9 feet at Mayport, 2.6 feet at Dame Point, and 1.1 feet at Jacksonville. The extreme range varies from about 9 feet on the bar to about 1.5 feet at Jacksonville. Strong northeasterly winds raise the water level about 2 feet at Mayport and Jacksonville. Strong southwesterly winds lower the water about 1.5 feet at Mayport and 1 foot at Jacksonville. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests have fully complied with requirements of local cooperation for work performed to date. For work authorized by the 1965 River and Harbor Act, local interests were required to contribute 2.6 percent of the contract price plus supervision and administration for work provided by the Corps; provide all lands and rights-of-way; save the United States free from damages; and provide and maintain public terminal and transfer facilities. Assurances of local cooperation for this work were accepted February 11, 1966. Terminal facilities. There are approximately 100 waterfront facilities serving the port, including 29 commercially operated, four of which are open to the public. There are 12 commercial oil terminals and four oil docks operated by the Navy. Rail connections are available to all but one of the oil terminals and to most commercial facilities. A superphosphoric' acid storage and handling facilitiy is located at Jacksonville Bulk Terminal. Jacksonville Shipyards have facilities for building and repairing large vessels, and numerous facilities are available for repairing and servicing small craft. Jacksonville Port Authority operates municipal docks at two locations, Talleyrand and Blount Island. Available at Talleyrand are over 600,000 square feet of warehousing, 4,800 feet of marginal wharf, 102 acres of paved open storage, two container cranes, a container straddle carrier, and a 50-ton gantry crane. The facility has extensive rail and highway connections. At Blount Island Terminal there are a total of 3,550 feet of marginal wharf, nearly 200 acres of paved open storage, 27 acres of container storage area, an automobile processing plant, three transit sheds, four cranes and a 900-ton capacity gantry crane. There are also two 900-foot container berths, a concrete and steel roll on/roll off platform, and two mobile roll on/roll off ramps for servicing container vessels. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 15, Rev. 1978, Corps of Engineers.) Maintenance: Operation and maintenance of district communications network cost $7,042. Real estate management costs amounted to $3,479. Condition and operation studies cost $142,579. Maintenance dredging for contract cost $3,244,461. Credit for over estimate in mainenance dredging to Dredge Goethals was given in the amount of - $150,054. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $96,491 and $127,237, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the modification to the project, authorized by 1965 River and Harbor Act, is completed. The north jetty is in fair condition and partially submerged at high tide. The south jetty is in good condition; revetments and restraining walls are in poor condition. Total Federal costs under existing project through September 30, 1981, were $43,786,128 for new work, $35,670,780 for maintenance, a total of $79,456,908, regular funds. In addition $290,013 has been expended from public works funds for new work. 14. JOHNS PASS, FLA. Location. A natural inlet on the west coast of Florida connecting Boca Ciega Bay with Gulf of Mexico. The pass is located about 8 miles northwest of lower Tampa Bay directly across Boca Ciega Bay from St. Petersburg, Fla. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 1257.) Existing project. Channel 10 by 150 feet in the gulf, thence 8 by 100 feet inside pass, and 6 by 100 feet to the Intracoastal Waterway, and suitable protective measures over a frontage of approximately one thousand linear feet of shore along the north end of Treasure Island. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean range of tide is 1.5 feet. Project is about 2.6 miles long. Project was authorized December 2, 1964 by Chief of Engineers under Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act and by Section 110 of the 1966 River and Harbor Act. Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Non-Federal contribution for new work was $53,732. 9-8 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT Terminal facilities. Only small marinas and repair yards for recreational craft in the general vicinity. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Hired labor surveys, inspections and reports cost $35,123. Supervision and administration costs were $5. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was completed in 1968. As of June 1968 authorized depths were available throughout the project. 15. LONGBOAT PASS, FLA. Location. Longboat Pass is located on the west coast of Florida about 11 miles northwest of Sarasota and 23 miles south of St. Petersburg. Located in Manatee County, it is one of several natural inlets connecting Sarasota Bay, a tidal estuary, with the Gulf of Mexico. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 1256.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for an entrance channel 12 by 150 feet from the Gulf to Longboat Pass Bridge, thence a channel 10 by 100 feet from Longboat Pass Bridge along a north to northeasterly alinement to the Intracoastal Waterway and extending along Intracoastal Waterway to Cortez Bridge. The mean tidal range is 2.2 feet and the maximum tidal range is about 5 feet. Currents are predominantly tidal. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. See 1978 Annual Report for detailed local cooperation requirements. Contribued funds for new work were $172,324. Terminal facilities. From Sarasota north to Tampa Bay there are about 28 small craft facilities including marinas, boat repair yards, and boat basins along the Intracoastal Waterway. Nine of them are located within 2 miles of Longboat Pass. Numerous private mooring piers and wharves also exist in the area. The marina and repair facilities appear adequate for the general boating needs of the area. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and operation studies amounted to $3,536. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $40,459 and $3,200, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project is complete. 16. MAYAGUEZ HARBOR, P.R. Location. The project is on the west cost of Puerto Rico, about 110 miles by water from San Juan Harbor. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 931.). Existing project. The authorized project provides for a 30-by 1,000 foot approach channel to the deep water terminal, decreasing to a 500 foot width opposite westerly end of terminal, thence the same width to easterly end of terminal. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. A modern deep water terminal is located in the northeast section of the harbor consisting of a bulkhead wharf about 1,270 feet long with a storage transit-shed 800 by 60 feet immediately shoreward. The Puerto Rico Industrial Development Company, an agency of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, owns a bulk-head wharf of about 200 feet in line with the existing deep water terminal plant located within the industrial harbor area. In addition, IBEC Packing Compaany, Inc., owns and operates a dock of about 200 feet for docking tuna fishing boats. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and operation studies cost $7,779. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $16,229 and $857, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was completed in 1934. 17 MIAMI HARBOR, FLA. Location. Miami is near the northern end of Biscayne Bay, about 71 miles south of the entrance to Palm Beach Harbor. Miami River has its source in th Everglades and flows southeasterly to enter Biscayne Bay at Miami. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 547 and 1248.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a 38 by 500-foot channel from the ocean to the outer end of the north jetty, thence 36 by 400 feet through the entrance and across Biscayne Bay to and including a turning basin at the municipal terminals; a 36-foot depth turning basin at Fisher Island; two rubblestone jetties at the entrance; a channel 15 by 200 feet from the mouth of Miami River to the turning basin at the municipal terminals; a channel 8 by 200 feet from the mouth of Miami River to the Intracoastal Waterway and thence 100 feet wide to Government Cut; a channel 15 deep in Miami River varying in width from 250 feet at mouth to 90 feet inland; and a channel 12 by 100 feet from Miami to a harbor of refuge in Palmer Lake. Plane of reference is mean low water, except for 15-foot channel in Miami River where depths are based 9-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 on flood conditions. Total length of the project is about 15.3 miles. Mean tidal variation is 2.5 feet at entrance and 2 feet in the bay. Extreme variation is about 4.5 feet at entrance and 3 feet in Biscayne Bay. Strong easterly winds raise the water level about 1.5 feet at entrance and 1 foot in the bay. Strong westerly winds lower water level about 1 foot at entrance and about 0.5 foot in the bay. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. See 1978 Annual Report for detailed local cooperation requirments. Assurances of local cooperation for the 1968 modification to the project were accepted December 18, 1968. Terminal facilities. Existing facilitieis consist of 82 piers and wharves, of which two are on Fisher Island, 12 at Miami Beach, four along the south side of MacArthur Causeway, one along the west side of Biscayne Bay at Miami, and 43 on Miami River. Nineteen facilities are open to the public for handling general cargo, eleven of which accommodate deep-draft vessels. All general cargo wharves have highway and railway connections except the causeway terminl which has highway connections only. A municipal yacht anchorage basin and wharf are open to the public for recreational craft. Of the remaining piers and wharves, five are used for handling petroleum products, 22 are used in connection with ship repair activities, and 19 are used for mooring vessels or handling private freight. In addition, numerous landing facilities in and around Miami are designed for and used exclusively by recreational craft. Metropolitan Dade County is actively engaged in developing port facilities on Dodge Island in Biscayne Bay. Completed and in use are approximately 11,090 feet of berthing space. Eight passenger terminals can each accommodate and process 900 persons through customs. There are 7 transit cargo sheds with a total of 823,558 square feet. There are presently in use ten berths for foil-on trailerships. A slip of 800 feet by 400 feet on the south side of the island is being utilized for oceanographic research vessels. An additional 17 acres of open storage has been added to space already available. Upon completion, facilities are expected to be adequate for current commerce. (See Port Series No. 16, Revised 1972, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs preparatory to constuction of recreation facilities at Bay Front Park were $22,114 and $2,168, respectively. Maintenance: Hired labor surveys, inspections and reports cost $25,047 for the fiscal year. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the modification to the project, authorized by River and Harbor Acto of 1968, is complete. South and north jetties are in good condition. Maintnenance dredging is required in the turning basin at the municipal terminals. 18. NEW PASS, SARASOTA, FLA. Location. Sarasota Bay is a tidal lagoon along the west coast of Florida immediately south of Tampa Bay. New Pass is a gulf inlet across the bay from Sarasota, Fla. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 857-SC.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for an entrance channel 10 feet deep and 150 feet wide in the Gulf of Mexico diminishing to 8 by 100 feet through New Pass and extending across Sarasota Bay to the Intracoastal Waterway with side channels to, and turning basins at, Payne Terminal and city pier. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean range of tide is 1.3 feet in Sarasota Bay; mean spring range is 1.7 feet. Project is about 4 miles long. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Non-Federal contribution for new work amounted to $45,811. Terminal facilities. Consist of Payne Terminal, a slip 200 by 650 feet, and city pier, 400 feet long with two finger piers equipped with adequate facilities at each location. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation and condition surveys cost $8,999 for the fiscal year. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $21,803 and $3,109, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was completed in 1964. 19. OKEECHOBEE WATERWAY, FLA. Location. The waterway traverses the southern part of the Florida peninsula via the Caloosahatchee River, Lake Okeechobee, and St. Lucie Canal, connecting coastal waterways along the Gulf and Atlantic Shores. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 11428 and 11427.) Previous projects. For details, see page 785 of 1949 Annual Report. Existing project. The authorized project provides for replacing the old locks on the St. Lucie Canal by a single new lock; a channel 10 by 100 feet from Ft. Myers for about 5 miles upstream, 9-10 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT thence 8 by 80 to 100 feet to the Intracoastal Waterway, Jacksonville to Miami; near Stuart; an 8-foot depth basin at Stuart; a side channel at Ft. Myers; operation and care of St. Lucie Lock; and maintenance of features completed under previous projects as follows: a 12 by 200-foot channel from the Gulf to Punta Rassa, thence 10 by 100 feet to Fort Myers with a 10-foot depth basin at Fort Myers; a 6 by 80-foot channel along the south shore of Lake Okeechobee from Clewiston to St. Lucie Canal; a 6 by 60-foot channel in Taylor Creek from the town of Okeechobee to the Lake; and operation and care of Moore Haven and Ortona Locks. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) For further details see 1962 Annual Report. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed portion of project. Non-Federal contribution amounted to $502,407. Terminal facilities. There are 3 freight piers, 1 municipal recreation pier, 4 privately owned piers, and a municipal yacht basin on the Caloosahatchee River near Fort Myers. The Corps has provided a boat basin, launching ramp, and a 120-foot wharf on the Caloosahatchee River about one-quarter mile below Ortona Lock. There are tie-up dolphins above and below all 5 locks. Commercial yacht basins are provided on the south side of the Caloosahatchee River about halfway between Ortona and Moore Haven Locks and about 3 miles east of LaBelle. A commercial/ municipal yacht basin is provided on the north side of the St. Lucie Canal at Indiantown. There are numerous small wooden-pile landings along the Caloosahatchee River on St. Lucie Canal, and on the St. Lucie River, including one railroad terminal pier, a municipal pier, and a pier for handling petroleum products at Stuart. Also, 550 feet of wharves have been provided on the west side of Taylor Creek immediately landward of Hurricane Gate No. 6 and 150 feet on the east side of the creek. A yacht basin has been provided on the west side of the creek immediately landward of the hurricane gate. The installations of Taylor Creek are privately owned, but are open to the public. A breakwater protected harbor is available at Pahokee. There is a 440-foot marginal wharf on the Industrial Canal at Clewiston; a 125-foot wharf at LaBelle; a 150-foot wharf at Belle Glade; a 125-foot wharf at Moore Haven; a 50-foot wharf at Alva; and a 30-foot wharf on Taylor Creek at the town of Okeechobee. A docking facility for loading raw sugar was constructed in 1967 on Herbert Hoover Dike near Belle Glade. All have highway and/or railway connections. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. (See Table 9-F for work accomplished.) Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is complete except for providing the 8-foot depth basin at Stuart, which is inactive. Total Federal costs under the existing project through September 30, 1981, were $5,079,232 for new work, $8,730,169 for maintenance, and $6,144,424 ($67,558 excluded which represents services rendered without reimbursement) for operation and care, a total of $19,953,825. 20. OKLAWAHA RIVER, FLA. Location. The river has its source in a system of large lakes in the central part of the Florida peninsula and flows generally northerly, then easterly, emptying into St. Johns River 22 miles above Palatka. The extreme head of the system is considered to be Lake Apopka, 120 miles above the river's mouth. Previous projects. For details, see page 613 of 1938 Annual Report. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 6 feet deep from the river mouth to the head of Silver Springs Run; clearing a channel to Lake Griffin; maintaining dikes to obtain a navigable depth of about 4 feet to Leesburg and construction of a lock and dam at Moss Bluff. The project length is about 85.7 miles in the river and 5.4 miles in Silver Springs Run. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Numerous private and public landings and boat-launching ramps are located along the river. Public recreation-craft basins and boat launching ramps are near Silver Springs and State Road 40 and 316 bridges. There is a municipal wharf on Lake Griffin at Leesburg. A dam has created Lake Ocklawaha (13,000 acres) with egress to the St. Johns River through Buckman Lock. Along the lake are 4 launching ramps; Payne's Landing, Orange Springs, Kenwood Landing, and Rodman Recreation Area. Access below the dam is at the Oklawaha Boat launch ramp and at State Road 19. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and operation studies cost $66. Snagging and clearing cost $17,418. Supervision and administration costs were $3,206. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is complete except for providing a 6-foot depth channel from the mouth of the river to the head of Silver Springs run, which is in an inactive status. 9-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 The Moss Bluff lock and dam structure was replaced under the Four River Basins, Fla., flood control project. Total Federal costs under the existing project through September 30, 1981 have been $311,352 for new work and $1,894,950 for maintenance (excluding $11,414 under provisions of the permanent indefinite appropriation), a total of $2,206,302. 21. PALM BEACH HARBOR, FLA. Location. The authorized project is located on the east coast of Florida about 71 miles north of the entrance to Miami Harbor and about 264 miles southeasterly from the entrance to Jacksonville Harbor. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 291 and 1248). Existing project. The authorized project provides for an entrance channel 35 by 400 feet merging with an inner channel 33 by 300 feet to and including a turning basin; tank revetment; and restoring jetties. Plane of reference is mean low water. The project is about 1.6 miles long. Mean range of tide in the ocean at the entrance is 2.8 feet and at the turning basin, 2.2 feet. Extreme range of tide is about 4.5 feet at the inlet and 3 feet at the terminals. Seven-foot tidal ranges have occurred during storms. For details, see 1962 Annual Report. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. For requirements, see 1961 Annual Report. Non- Federal contribution for new work was $509,506. Terminal facilities. The port has two slips, four marginal wharves containing 25 berths along 5,039 feet of bulkheading, six roll-on/roll-off ramps, nearly 225,000 square feet of warehouse space and 43 acres of open storage space. There are seven petroleum storage tanks connected by pipeline to terminals, a raw sugar warehouse and terminal and a cement storage warehouse. A new five-story Port Authority office building is under construction and scheduled for completion in December 1981. Demolition of the old facility will provide additional operating space. All facilities are owned by the Port of Palm Beach District. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 16, revised 1972, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging by contract cost $200,000. Condition and operation studies for the project totaled $48,118. Operation and maintenance of the district communications network cost $5,281. Supervision and administration costs were $3,445. Condition at end of fiscal year. The Project was completed in 1967. Jetties and revetment are in good condition. 22. PONCE DE LEON INLET, FLA. Location. Ponce de Leon Inlet is on the Atlantic coast of Florida about 65 miles south of St. Augustine Harbor and 57 miles north of Canaveral Harbor. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 1245.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for an entrance channel 15 by 200 feet across the ocean bar, thence 12 by 200 feet and 12 by 100 feet through the inlet; thence southward in Indian River North, 12 by 100 feet, and northward in Halifax River, 7 by 100 feet, each leg continuing to the Intracoastal Waterway; ocean jetties on the north and south of the inlet 4,200 and 2,700 feet long, respectively, and a weir in the north jetty with an impoundment basin inside the jetty. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean range of tide is 4.1 feet in the ocean and 2.3 feet inside the inlet. The project is about 5 miles long. Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Non-Federal contribution for new work was $2,377,884. Terminal facilities. None in the immediate area. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance of the district communications network cost $587. Condition and operation studies cost $59,199. Cost for the sea turtle task force amounted to $35,000. Jetty repair by contract cost $68,310. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $58,142 and $13,480, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project is complete. Ocean jetties and weir are in good condition. 23. PONCE HARBOR, P. R. Location. Ponce Harbor is an open bay about midway on the south coast of Puerto Rico. From the center of the city of Ponce, the harbor is about 3 miles south. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart Nos. 927 and 902.) Previous project. For details, see page 12 of Annual Report for 1975. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a seawall 362 feet long extending northwesterly across the rock reef from near the landward end of the municipal pier; dredging an area off the municipal pier, 30 feet deep and containing about 18 acres; a breakwater 2400 feet long extending southwesterly from Punta Carenero; a chan- 9-12 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT nel 36 feet deep by 600 feet wide extending from the Caribbean Sea approximately 2.8 miles up to the port, thence a channel 400 feet wide by 36 feet deep into the harbor, and a 36-foot-deep, irregularly shaped turning basin with a diameter of 950 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean tidal range is 0.6 foot, extreme varies between about 1 foot below and 2 feet above mean low water. Estimated Federal cost of new work (Oct. 1980 price levels) is $7,070,000 with no local contribution required. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Should provide all lands, easements and rights-of-way; provide and maintain at local expense depths in berthing areas and local access channels; hold United States free from any damages resulting from construction and maintenance of the project; relocate without cost to the United States all cables, sewer mains, water supply, drainage and other utility installations as required; provide adequate public terminal and transfer facilities open to all on equal terms. A letter has been received from local interests, assuring compliance with local requirements. Further assurances are not required until completion of Phase I GDM. No contribution is required from locals. Terminal facilities. The municipality of Ponce owns and operates the only deep-draft terminal facilities in Ponce Harbor, which consist of a municipal pier 515 feet long and 108 feet wide, and a bulkhead wharf 2,611 feet long. Both are equipped for transfer and storage of freight. An additional 1,200 feet of bulkhead wharf and a 72.5 ton container lift shore crane were recently completed. The municipal pier has a steel transit shed 386 by 85 feet. The bulkhead wharf has four steel transit sheds totaling over 103,000 square feet. Three concrete and steel warehouses are available providing 880,000 square feet for general storage. Open storage areas for structural steel, lumber, and other bulk and package commodities are also provided. Bulk cement is handled and loaded into cement cargo ships by the use of a private pipeline loading facility. A tuna fish processing and canning factory is located on the premises, with direct access to the bulkhead wharf. Existing facilities are open to the public. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $17,462 and $2,388, respectively. Maintenance: Hired labor surveys, inspections and reports cost $918. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $17,638 and $1,080, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the 1976 modification of the project has not commenced. South and north jetties are in fair condition. Maintenance dredging is required in the turning basin at the municipal terminals. 24. PORT EVERGLADES HARBOR, FLA. Location. The harbor is on the east coast of Florida about 23 miles north of Miami and about 48 miles south of Palm Beach Harbor, Florida. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 546.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for an ocean entrance channel 45 by 500 feet through an ocean bar tapering to 40 by 450 feet between rubblestone entrance jetties, and continuing at that depth to an irregularly flared entrance and turning basin of same depth; enlarging Pier 7 channel to 36 by 400 feet for distance of about 1,600 feet; maintenance of the locally dredged channel opposite Berth 18 to 36 feet deep over a length of 700 feet with varying widths of 200 to 150 feet; planning for a south jetty fishing walkway with construction contingent upon need as developed by detailed postauthorization studies; and, maintenance of the jetties. Plane of reference is mean low water. The project is about 1.9 miles long. Mean range of tide is 2.5 feet at the entrance and 2.3 feet at the terminals; extreme range is about 4.5 feet with storm tides of about 6.5 feet. Estimated cost of new work (Oct. 1980 price levels) of the 1974 authorization is $33,800,000 Federal (Corps of Engineers) cost and $7,062,000 non-Federal cost, $160,000 contributed funds and $6,902,000 other costs). (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local Cooperation has been fully complied with for work completed to date. For work under House Document 144/93/1, local interest must: provide all lands, easements, and rights-of-way; save United States free from damages; accomplish utility and other relocations or alterations; provide depths in berthing areas and local access channels serving the terminals commensurate with depths provided in the related project areas; establish regulations prohibiting discharge of pollutants into waters of the channel by users thereof; prohibit erection of any structure within 100 feet of project channel as authorized at time of construction; provide and maintain public terminal and transfer facilities; contribute 50 percent of total first costs of recreational jetty fishing facility; and operate and maintain jetty fishing facility. Assurances of local cooperation for the 1974 authorization have been furnished by the local sponsor. 9-13 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 Terminal facilities. All public port facilities are owned and operated by Port Everglades Authority. There are 27 commercial ship berths providing a total berthing space of over 16,000 linear feet. Ten berths are in three slips ranging from 900 to 1200 feet long and about 300 feet wide. Depth is 44 feet mean low water at two of the 900-foot berths and 33-37 feet mean low water at the remaining berths. There are eight transit warehouses with a capacity of 497,000 square feet, and over 100 acres of open storage. Private companies maintain over 200 storage tanks for petroleum products, and operate piping facilities extending from the port south to Miami. A 30-ton container crane has been in service at the port since 1979. All wharves are served by railway and highway connections. Marine repair and drydocking facilities are available for small and medium size vessels. A large passenger pier and terminal complex is located in the south part of the harbor. A Foreign Trade Zone, containing 140,000 square feet of warehouse space, is located less than 1/2 mile from dockside. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 16, Revised 1972, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Dredging for Section 1 was completed by contract at a cost of $5,106,169. Dredging for section 2 was performed by contract at a cost of $2,396,553. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $93,645 and $266,957, respectively. Maintenance: Costs for the sea turtle task force were $35,000. Hired labor surveys, inspections and reports cost $906. Condition at end of fiscal year. Work required to complete the project is construction authorized in House Document 144/93/1. 25. REMOVAL OF AQUATIC GROWTH. FROM NAVIGABLE WATERS IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA. Location. Waterhyacinth, hydrilla and water lettuce are found in freshwater streams and lakes in various parts of the district. Existing project. The authorized project provides for destruction or removal of aquatic growth in navigable waters of the State so far as they constitute an obstruction to navigation and commerce, using any mechanical, chemical or other means not injurious to cattle, and use of log booms to close sloughs and backwaters as an auxiliary means. No estimate of the final cost of work has been made. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) For further details, see 1962 Annual Report. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operations continued during the year. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) (See Table 9-G for spraying operations.) Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is for maintenance of navigable waterways. During the year 10,187 acres of hyacinths, 5,178 acres of hydrilla, 107 acres of minor plant and 5,970 acres of waterlettuce and hyacinth mix were controlled in approximately 2,200 miles of waterways. Hyacinths in Lake Okeechobee and in St. Johns River Watershed are under maintenance control. 26. ST. AUGUSTINE HARBOR FLA. Location. The harbor is on the east coast of Florida, about 35 miles south of the entrance to St. Johns River and about 180 miles north of Fort Pierce Harbor. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 1243 and 1244.) Previous project. For details see page 412 of Annual Report for 1958. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 16 feet by 200 feet along the best natural alinement as may exist from time to time across the new inlet bar, thence 12 feet deep to the Intracoastal Waterway; a sandtrap groin on the north side of the inlet extending seaward from the shore of Vilano Beach, and a sand-tight jetty on the south side of the channel extending seaward from the shore of Conch Island parallel to and coexstensive with the groin, future landward extension of the groin and jetty; and a channel 10 by 100 feet in San Sebastian River from the Intracoastal Waterway to King Street Bridge, with a turning basin near the upper end. Length of the inlet channel is about 1.5 miles, and length of the San Sebastian River channel is about 2.6 miles. Plane of reference is mean low water. The mean tidal range is 4.5 feet in the ocean at St. Augustine Inlet and 4.2 feet at the city waterfront. Strong northerly winds, mostly in the winter, lower the water surface about 1 foot. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Non-Federal contribution for new work amounted to $137,500. Terminal facilities. There are several timber docks on the Matanzas waterfront of St. Augustine. In this area of the harbor is a concrete dock which serves as a municipal yacht pier. It has fuel facilities, 19 slips and accommodates boats up to 60 ft. in length. A large public boat ramp is also available. The principal terminals are the numerous shrimp docks in the San Sebastian 9-14 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT River which flows southward through the city into the Matanzas River south of the bridge; these consist of timber wharves, with frame and corrugated iron warehouses thereon, and 9 marine railways for small boats. There is also a marine supply facility and several boat yards. The present terminals have highway connections and several of the shrimp docks have rail connections. They are considered adequate for existing commerce and recreational craft. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contract surveys, inspections and reports cost $349. Condition and operation studies cost $14,543. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $29,759 and $3,296 respectively. Hired labor surveys, inspections and reports cost $175. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is completed except for the North Jetty which is in a deferred status. The groin is in good condition except for the 300 feet which has subsided to about elevation 3.0 feet, mean low water. The jetty is in good condition, but is submerged at high tide. Total Federal costs under the existing project through September 30, 1981 were $1,405,131 for new work and $4,144,499 for maintenance, a total of $5,549,630. 27. ST. JOHN'S RIVER, FLA., JACKSONVILLE TO LAKE HARNEY Location. Rises in marshes of Brevard County, Fla., near east coast, and flows northwesterly to Jacksonville, thence easterly into the Atlantic Ocean, 122 miles south of Savannah River. River is about 285 miles long, of which 161.5 miles are included in project. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 685-688.) Previous projects. Adopted by River and Harbor Acts of June 14, 1880 and July 5, 1884. For further details see Annual Reports for 1915 and 1938. Existing project. Channel 13 feet deep and 200 feet wide from Florida East Coast Railway bridge at Jacksonville to Palatka, thence 12 by 100 feet to Sanford, and thence 5 by 100 feet to Lake Harvey, with side channel to Enterprise and maintenance of two jetties. Existing project was authorized by River and Harbor Acts of March 2, 1945 (H. Doc. 445, 78th Cong., 2d sess.) and July 24, 1946 (S. Doc. 208, 79th Cong., 2d sess.). For further details see Annual Report for 1962. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for active portions of project (see Annual Report for 1962.) Terminal facilities. There are 36 piers and wharves along project, including municipal piers and wharves at Green Cove Springs and Palatka, 12 Navy piers at Green Cove Springs, a municipal recreational pier at Sanford, and 19 privately owned piers, 5 of which have nearby tank storage facilities for petroleum projects. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commercie. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and operation studies costs were $20,249. Supervision and administration costs were $700. Condition at end of fiscal year. Active portion is complete. Condition of project as a whole is adequate for present needs of navigation. (For more detailed information refer to Annual Report for F.Y. 1963). 28. ST. LUCIE INLET, FLA. Location. The inlet is on the east coast of Florida about 19 miles south of the entrance to Fort Pierce Harbor, Florida, and 100 miles north of the entrance to Miami Harbor, Florida. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 1247.) Previous project. For details see page 764 of Annual Report for 1949. Existing project. The authorized project provides for extending the north jetty about 500 feet and modifying existing jetty to provide a sand bypass weir section about 500 feet long; excavation of a sand impoundment basin adjacent to the bypass weir in the north jetty; construction of a south jetty consisting of a rubblemound structure about 2,400 feet long with a walkway for recreational fishing; channel between existing bar cut and the Intracoastal Waterway 10 by 500 feet through the bar cut, tapering to 150 feet through the inlet, and 100 feet wide and 7 feet deep to the Intracoastal Waterway; and transfer of 380,000 cubic yards of material to the south beach during each two year maintenance period. Plane of reference is mean low water. Total project length is about 1.9 miles. Mean tidal range is 2.6 feet on the ocean side and about 1 foot on the land side of the inlet. The estimated cost of the 1974 modification (Oct. 1979 price levels) to the project is $6,290,000 Federal cost and $2,525,000 non-Federal cost ($2,260,000 contributed funds and $265,000 other costs). (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must: contribute 19.9 percent of construction cost allocated to navigation in the combined project, 23.2 percent allocated to beach erosion, and 50 percent of construction cost of jetty fishing walkway; provide 39.8 percent of the annual maintenance cost 9-15 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 allocated to navigation and 23.2 percent of the annual costs for maintenance dredging allocated to beach erosion control for periodic beach nourishment and 100 percent of the annual jetty maintenance costs allocated to beach erosion control; maintain jetty fishing walkway; agree that each five years the amount of local cost sharing for maintenance is to be adjusted; provide all lands, easements, and rights-of-way; hold United States free from damages; provide marina with mooring facilities and utilities; provide and maintain depths in berthing area and local access and feeder channels commensurate with the depths provided in the project; accomplish such alterations as required in sewer, water supply, drainage, and other utility facilities, and take action to place in effect statutes and/or regulations which will protect the water quality for the authorized uses of the project. Assurances of local cooperation for the 1974 modification have not yet been requested from the local sponsor. Terminal facilities. A municipal pier provides facilities for docking and servicing charter fishing and small recreational craft. At Stuart there is a dock for handling bulk petroleum products and several marinas which provide facilities for mooring, servicing and minor repair of small craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: A dredging and jetty construction contract underway at a cost of $4,910,344. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $13,531 and $240,364, respectively. Maintenance: Costs for the sea turtle task force were $36,000. Contract dredging costs amounted to $6,425. Condition at end of fiscal year. Work required to complete the project is construction authorized in House Document 294/93/1. Total Federal costs under existing project through September 30, 1981 were $7,478,074 for new work (including $1,815,000 contributed funds) and $2,175,903 for maintenance, a total of $9,653,977. 29. ST. PETERSBURG HARBOR, FLA. Location. St. Petersburg is on west shore of Tampa Bay 8.75 miles southwest of Port Tampa City. Entrance from Gulf of Mexico to Tampa Bay is about midway of west coast of Florida, about 330 miles southeast of Pensacola, Fla., and 65 miles north of Charlotte Harbor, Fla. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 586 and 1257.) Previous projects. For details, see Annual Report of 1938. Existing project. An entrance channel 24 by 300 feet from Tampa Bay southwesterly and thence westerly along south side of Port of St. Petersburg basin to Bayboro Harbor: a 24-foot depth in the port basin and in the area between the entrance channel and the Maritime Service south bulkhead; a channel 15 by 100 feet in Bayboro Harbor along southwesterly 300 feet of the Maritime Service bulkhead; a basin 12 by 800 by 700 feet-1,400 feet in Bayboro Harbor, a channel 12 by 75 by 300 feet in the mouth of Salt Creek; an entrance channel 20 by 200 feet extending northerly about 5.5 miles from deep water in lower Tampa Bay; and thence a channel 19 by 250 feet leading westward to the 24-foot depth entrance channel, and a channel 16 by 200 by 6,200 feet on the easterly side of the Point Pinellas lighted beacon. Local cooperation. Local interests must furnish lands, rights-of-way, and spoil-disposal areas; hold United States free from damages; and strengthen or move structures necessary to safeguard the channels and adjacent lands and structures. Requirements for active part fully complied with. Terminal facilities. A 1,500-foot-long municipal wharf and two warehouses at the Port of St. Petersburg turning basin. From turning basin to Bayboro Harbor the U.S. Maritime training station has 1,360 feet of wharfage space. On Bayboro Harbor, there are 5 oil company wharves, 2 marine repair and supply plants, a sand and shell wharf, 6 marine railways, steam-electric plant and fuel wharf of the Florida Power Corp., and 4 privately owned marginal wharves. Two oil companies have terminals on Salt Creek and there are three municipal yacht basins north of Port of St. Petersburg. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce and are open to all equally. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Cost for contract dredging amounted to $1,347,148. Condition and operation studies cost $1,492. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were - $27,514 and $95,667, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for 24-foot-depth channel and basin from Tampa Bay to Bayboro Harbor which is considered inactive. Controlling depths: 20.5 feet in 20-foot channel leading northward from Tampa Bay in April 1966; 19 feet in 19-foot entrance channel and 17 feet throughout Port of St. Petersburg basin in March 1963; 14.5 feet in Point Pinellas Channel in May 1938; and 12 feet in Bayboro Harbor and in mouth of Salt Creek in August 1957. Total Federal costs for existing project through September 30, 1981 were $255,608 for new work and $1,660,319 for maintenance, a total of $1,915,927. 9-16 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT 30. SAN JUAN HARBOR, P. R. Location. San Juan Harbor is on the north coast of Puerto Rico about 35 miles from the island's east end and 1100 miles southeast of Miami, Florida. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 908.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1915, 1916, 1938. Existing project. Provides for a bar channel 48 by 800 feet, shifting the centerline 350 feet west; deepening Anegado Channel in steps from 46 to 40 feet while reducing its width to 800 feet; deepening Army Terminal Channel and turning basin to 40 feet while widening the channel to 450 feet; deepening Puerto Nuevo Channel to 40 feet and widening it to 400 feet; deepening Graving Dock Channel to 40 feet at existing 400 foot width; an advance maintenance area 500 feet wide, 1,200 feet long and 44 feet deep at the mouth of Cano de Martin Pena.; deepening San Antonio Channel to 38 feet at varying widths, minimum of 500 feet; deepening cruise ship basin to 36 feet at an irregular width; maintaining Sabana Approach Channel at 30 by 250 feet; provide a 38-foot depth in Anchorage Area "E" with irregular width and six mooring dolphins for vessels using the area. Mean tidal range is 1.1 feet. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Should provide all lands, easements and rights-of-way; hold the United States free from any damages; provide and maintain depths in berthing areas and local access and feeder channels; provide alterations as required in sewer water supply, and other utility facilities. It is further recommended that local interests be reimbursed for work performed by them on the project subsequent to project authorization. Local interests have complied with authorization requirements to date. There is no non-Federal contribution required. Terminal facilities. There are 28 piers and bulkhead wharves in the harbor capable of docking deep-draft vessels, which have an aggregate berthing length of about 23,700 feet. Eleven piers and bulkhead wharves are on the north shore, 2 at front Graving Dock turning basin and channel, 9 at the eastern side and 3 at the western side of the Army Terminal basin and channel, and 3 on the south shore of San Antonio Channel. One pier and bulkhead wharf are privately owned, 7 are U.S. Government property, and 24 owned by the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. Twenty piers and wharves are equipped with mechanical transfer facilities. Five wharves are equipped with a special crane for the handling of loaded containers. Twenty-four are open to general public. There is an aggregate length of about 1,339 feet of berthing space at Catano Point used principally by small vessels within the 18-foot draft range. This space is also open to the public. In addition, there are 10 piers and bulkhead wharves with approximately 6,910 feet of berthing space owned and operated by different agencies of the Federal Government. This space is not open to the public. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and operation studies cost $17,288. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $4,848 and $1,961 respectively. Hired labor surveys, inspections and reports cost $42. Condition at end of fiscal year. Remaining work to complete project is modification authorized in 1976. Total Federal costs under the existing project through September 30, 1981 were $13,027,284 for new work and $10,466,052 for maintenance, a total of $23,493,336 regular funds. In addition, $427,068 was expended for new work and $24,737 for maintenance from public works funds and $100,000 for new work from contributed funds. Existing project includes the entrance channel and turning basin to Army Terminal which cost $1,543,712; this expenditure was made from military appropriations and is not included in above costs. 31. TAMPA HARBOR, FLA. Location. Tampa Harbor is in a large natural indentation of the Gulf of Mexico about midway of the west coast of Florida. The entrance is about 220 miles north of Key West and about 330 miles southeast of Pensacola. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 586, 587, and 1257.) Previous projects. For details see page 665 of 1938 Annual Report. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel from the Gulf of Mexico to Port Sutton and Tampa; 46 by 700 feet from the Gulf of Mexico to Mullet Key; 44 by 600 feet in Mullet Key Cut Channel; 44 by 500 feet in Tampa Bay from Mullet Key Cut to Hillsborough Bay and Port Tampa Channels; 44 by 500 feet in Hillsborough Bay from junction with Tampa Bay and Port Tampa Channels to the junction with Port Sutton entrance channel, thence 42 by 400 feet to the junction with Seddon and Garrison Channels; 44 by 400 feet in Port Sutton entrance channel; 42 by 400 feet in Sparkman Channel; 40 by 300 feet in Ybor Channel; 42 by 400 feet in Port Tampa Channel; 44 by 400-500 feet in East Bay entrance channel; 44 by 300 feet in East Bay ap- 9-17 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 proach channel; 30 by 300 feet in Seddon and Garrison Channels; 30 by 200 feet in Alfia River; 9 by 100 feet in Hillsborough River to a point 2,000 feet above Columbus River bridge; a breakwater; turning basins at Port Sutton, Ybor Channel, Port Tampa, East Bay, mouth of Hillsborough River, and in Alafia River; and maintenance of a channel 12 by 200 feet in Hillsborough River, and 44 by 200 feet in Port Sutton terminal channel. (The 46-foot and 44-foot depth portions of the project include a 5-foot underkeel clearance. Special studies on the project concluded that a 4-foot underkeel is sufficient. Therefore, a 1-foot overdepth has been placed in an inactive status, resulting in active project depths of 45 and 43 feet, respectively.) Plane of reference is mean low water. The project is about 67 miles long, including 10 miles in Hillsborough River and 3.6 miles in Alafia River. Mean range of tide is 1.3 feet at the lower end of the bay, 1.6 feet at Port Tampa, and 1.8 feet at Tampa. Extreme range is about 3.8 feet at the lower end of the bay and 4.8 feet at Tampa. Strong southwesterly winds raise the water level about 1.5 feet. Strong northerly winds, which usually occur in the winter, lower the water level about 2 feet. Estimated cost of new work (Oct. 1980 price levels) of the 1970 modification to the project is $223,570,000. Federal ($222,000,000 Corps and $1,570,000 U.S. Coast Guard) cost and $4,580,000 non-Federal cost ($1,340,000 contributed funds and $3,240,000 other costs). (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) For further details, see 1962 Annual Report. Local cooperation. Local cooperation has been fully complied with for work completed to date. See 1978 Annual Report for requirements for work authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1970, HD 401/91/2 and HD 150/91/1. Assurances of local cooperation for the 1970 authorization were approved by the Secretary of the Army on January 10, 1973. Terminal facilities. There are 93 commercial piers and wharves at Tampa, including those on Hillsborough River and Old Tampa Bay at Rattlesnake, Florida. Most facilities have railway connections. Municipal terminals (called Metroport) on Ybor Channel consist of a slip 750 by 350 feet with a total of 2,255 feet of berthing space and a steel-framed transit shed. The Tampa Port Authority operates an 800-head capacity cattle-loading wharf on the east side of Sparkman Channel. Ship repair facilities including a 900-foot drydock are available. There are 19 commercial oil terminals, 11 dry bulk terminals, 16 terminals for handling phosphate and phosphate related products, 2 privately owned cement storage facilities and a dockside cold storage facility. At Holland terminal there are four general cargo berths, a 600-foot roll on/roll off dock and two facilities specifically tailored for the importation and processing of pickup trucks. A liquid bulk facility is in operation at Hookers Point. Also at Hookers Point are ammonia storage tank facilities which are connected by pipeline to fertilizer plants in Polk and Hillsborough counties. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 17 revised 1979, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Construction of the 43-foot dredging project Egmont Channel, Cut 1, Section 1B and Egmont Key to Mullet Key, Section 2A was terminated for failure of contractor to make progress. Work is to be readvertised. Construction of a 43-foot dredging project Egmont Cut 1, Section 1C and Mullet Key to Mariposa Key was completed in April 1981 at a cost of $1,563,380. Construction of a dredging channel Section 4 Part, Cut A and 1/2 Cut C continued at a cost of $6,929,927. Construction of a dredging channel from Mangrove Point to Alafia River, Section 4 (Rem.) and Cut B Section 2C (Part) commenced May 16, 1981 at a contract cost of $3,696,751. Contract for providing channel in Tampa Bay, Cut B (Rem.) Section 2C (Rem.); Cut C Section 3A (Part) bay disposal was awarded September 28, 1981 but dredging operationals have not commenced. Miscellaneous hired labor costs for recently completed channel and canal construction were $557. Miscellaneous contract dredging consts were $101. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $705,904 and $564,615, respectively. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance of district communications network cost $8,998. Condition and operation studies cost $197,915. Contract and hired labor dredging costs amounted to $940. Hired labor surveys, inspections cost $5. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $127,234 and $21,524, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Work authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1970 (HD 401/91/2 is 57 percent complete.) Total Federal costs under the existing project through September 30, 1981 were: Main project: $113,436,367 for new work and $12,159,513 for maintenance, a total of $125,622,880 regular funds. In addition, $1,329,300 was expended for new work from public works funds, $1,463,000 from emergency relief funds, and $479,590 from contributed funds. On Hillsborough River $270,466 was expended for new work. 9-18 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT 32. NAVIGATION PROJECTS ON WHICH RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS ONLY WERE CONDUCTED DURING PERIOD. (See Table 9-H.) 33. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Table 9-I.) 34. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation Activities Pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (Preauthorization) Fiscal year costs for Cedar Island Keaton Beach, Florida; Dunedin Pass, Florida; Pahokee Harbor, Florida; Steinhatchee River, Florida; St. Thomas Harbor, Virgin Islands; Stokes Landing, Florida; and Wiggins Pass, Florida were $64,717, $4,008, $49,983, $1,501, $5,000, $30 and $11,527, respectively. Snagging and clearing for navigation (Sec. 3 of 1945 River and Harbor Act, Public Law 14, 79th Congress.) No costs incurred. Beach Erosion Control 35. BREVARD COUNTY, FLA. Location. The project is on the east coast of Florida at approximately the midpoint of the peninsula. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 1245 and 1246.) Existing project. The authorization provides for a protective and recreational beach with a berm 50 feet wide at elevation 10 feet above mean low water and a natural seaward slope as would be shaped by wave action, along 14,600 feet of beach at the city of Cape Canaveral and 10,600 feet of beach at Indialantic and Melbourne beach, and for periodic nourishment of the restored beach at Indialantic and Melbourne Beach limited initially to a period of 10 years. Nourishment of the restored beach at the city of Cape Canaveral would be provided by the authorized sandtransfer plant for construction at Canaveral Harbor. The project also provides for improvement of the Federally owned shores for beach erosion control or hurricane protection ,to be accomplished by the Federal agencies involved, subject to their own determination of economic justification. The areas involved include 4.9 miles of shore at Kennedy Space Center, 4.0 miles at Cape Kennedy Air Force Station, and 2.3 miles at Patrick Air Force Base. Mean tidal range in the area is 3.5 feet. Estimated cost of the project (Oct. 1980 price levels) is $6,900,000 Federal costs and $6,968,000 non-Federal cost ($6,900,000 cash contribution and $68,000 for lands). (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute 50 percent of all first costs of the work and 50 percent of the nourishment cost at Indialantic and Melbourne Beach for the first 10 years of the project life; provide lands and rightsof- way; provide, after the first 10 years of project life, periodic nourishment of the restored beach at Indialantic and Melbourne Beach during project life; maintain continued public ownership of the shore upon which the amount of Federal participation is based; control water pollution; and hold the United States free from damages. Assurances of local cooperation were approved by the Secretary of the Army on July 9, 1973. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: A construction contract for beach restoration work was completed in March 1981 and incurred costs of $3,126,946. Engineering and design and supervision and administration for the fiscal year cost $52,477 and $39,521, respectively. Maintenance: Hired labor surveys, inspections and reports cost $184. Condition at end of fiscal year. Initial beach fill has been provided at Indialantic and Melbourne beaches. 36. BROWARD COUNTY, FLA. BEACH EROSION CONTROL AND HILLSBORO INLET, FLA., NAVIGATION PROJECT Location. Broward County is on lower east coast of Florida, 300 miles south of Jacksonville and about 30 miles north of Miami. Hillsboro Inlet is in northern part of Broward County. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 1248.) Existing project. The authorization provides for Federal participation toward cost of a shore restoration and protection project and a project to provide and maintain a channel adequate for small craft navigation. Plan provides for restoration of a protective and recreational beach at four locations generally 100 feet wide with berm elevation of 10 feet above mean low water, a navigation channel 8 by 100 feet from the Intracoastal Waterway to a point 1,500 feet oceanward in Hillsboro Inlet, thence 10 by 150 feet in the ocean; jetties on north and south sides of ocean entrance; a permanently based floating dredge; and on a deferred basis, a trestle-mounted sand-transfer 9-19 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 plant, if needed. Navigation portion of the project is in an inactive status. Mean range of tide in areas is 2.5 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. Cost estimate for new work (Oct. 1980 price levels) is $9,040,000 Federal and $14,900,000 non-Federal contribution. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute 90.5 percent of the first cost of beach restoration in the reach between north county line and Hillsboro Inlet, 90 percent of first cost allocated to beach restoration, and 50 percent of first cost allocated to navigation for reach between Hillsboro Inlet and Port Everglades and 72.4 percent of beach restoration in reach between Port Everglades and south county line; provide all lands and rights-of-way; obtain approval of Chief of Engineers of plans and specifications if local interests construct beach erosion features; and furnish assurances that they will hold the United States free from damages, provide and maintain adequate public landing or wharf at Hillsboro Inlet, establish a public body to cooperate financially and to provide and operate local facilities for navigation, control water pollution, maintain ownership of publicly owned shores, and maintain all project works except the jetties (maintenance of the channel to revert to the United States if sand-transfer plant is constructed). Assurances of local cooperation were accepted November 22, 1968. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Local sponsor was reimbursed $481,501 toward the federal share of cost. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs for the fiscal year were $12,122 and $1,471. Maintenance: Hired labor surveys, inspections and reports cost $6. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was constructed by local interests and is complete. 37. ,DADE COUNTY, FLA. Location. Dade County is on the southeast coast of Florida. Project area consists of that part of the Atlantic shoreline of the county from Government Cut north to Bakers Haulover Inlet and at Haulover Beach Park. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey chart No. 1248.) Existing project. Project provides for a protective and recreational beach having a dune at elevation 11.5 feet and a level berm 50 feet wide at elevation 9 feet, mean low water, for beach erosion control and hurricane protection between Government Cut and Bakers Haulover Inlet; a protective and recreational beach with a berm elevation of 9 feet for beach erosion control at Haulover Beach Park; and Federal participation in the initial construction and in periodic nourishment of both the above reaches for the first 10 years of project life. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean range of tide in the area is 2.5 feet. Estimated cost of the project (Oct. 1980 price levels) is $40,000,000 Federal cost and $33,439,000 non-Federal cost $32,100,000 cash contribution and $1,339,000 other costs). Project was authorized by Flood Control Act of 1968 (HD 335/90/2). Local cooperation. Local interests must (a) contribute for the first cost of the work: between Government Cut and Bakers Haulover Inlet amounts ranging from 60.2 percent of the cost of the fill within the project limit with existing shorefront ownership, and 100 percent of the cost of fill required landward of the project limit; and for the work at Haulover Beach Park, contribute 21.3 percent of the entire first cost excluding costs for lands, easements, rights-of-way, relocations, and preproject work, but including credit for preproject work; (b) contribute in cost for the first 10 years of project life, amounts ranging from 88.9 percent of the nourishment cost for the beach, with existing ownership, to 60.7 percent with public ownership, and the entire maintenance cost for the dune, all between Government Cut and Bakers Haulover Inlet; (c) provide all lands and rights-of-way; (d) hold United States free from damages; (e) assure continued public ownership and use of the shore upon which the amount of Federal participation is based: (f) assure maintenance of the groin, and after the first 10 years of project life, periodic nourishment of the protective beach and maintenance of the dune during the economic life of the project; (g) assure that water pollution will not be permitted; (h) prevent removal or relocation by man of fill from the beach berm and dune; (i) prevent the erection of barriers to the littoral movement of material that would interfere with the nourishment of the beach; (j) maintain at the parks qualifying for 70 percent Federal participation a zone that excludes permanent human habitation; (k) at least annually inform interests affected that the project will not provide complete protection from a hurricane tide level equal to or higher in elevation than that of the hurricane of September 1926; and (1) establish in public ownership for public use the beaches within project limits as a requirement for Federal participation in the allocated beach erosion control costs of improvement of shores presently in private ownership. Assurances of local cooperation have been requested from the local sponsor. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Costs for the fiscal year for the third con- 9-20 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT tract which was awarded in January 1979 and completed during fiscal year 1980, for work done between 63rd Street and 37th Street, amounted to $1,213,912. The fourth contract was awarded in May 1980 for work between 37th Street and Lincoln Road. It was completed during fiscal year 1981 at a cost of $5,300,089 for the fiscal year. The fifth contract was awarded in June 1981 for work from North Jetty and Lincoln Road to Government Cut, costs incurred on the fifth contract for the fiscal year amounted to $9,590,000. Engineering and design and superivision and administration costs were $231,449 and $82,840, respectively. 38. DUVAL COUNTY, FLA. Location. On upper east coast of Florida, within 20 miles of Florida-Georgia line. Ocean shoreline is about 16 miles long. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 1243.) Existing project. Provides for Federal participation toward cost of constructing with artificial fill, a beach 60 feet wide at elevation 11 feet above mean low water with a natural slope seaward, and for periodic nourishment for 10 years. Federal participation to be 100 percent of the first cost of construction applicable to the Federal shore and 50 percent applicable to the other publicly owned shore and 55.5 percent of periodic nourishment cost for first 10 years of project life. Men tidal range at south jetty in St. Johns River is 4.9 feet. Estimated cost of new work (Oct. 1980 price levels) $9,930,000 Federal and $8,885,000 non- Federal ($7,070,000 contributed funds and $1,785,000 for other costs). Project was authorized by River and Harbor Act of 1965 (HD 273/89/1). Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute 50 percent of first cost of constructing non-Federal publicly owned shores; contribute 44.5 percent of periodic nourishment costs for first 10 years of project life; provide all lands, rights-of-way, and relocations; hold the United States free from damages; control water pollution; and furnish assurances that they will maintain continued public ownership of the shore upon which the amount of Federal participation is based during economic life of project. Assurances of local cooperation were accepted on November 29, 1973. Estimated contributed funds for new work is $7,200,000 Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Contract adjustment for the second contract for beach replenishment amounted to $87,005. The third contract was completed in November 1980 at a contract cost of $104,267. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $17,888 and $50,256, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Initial beach fill and four year advance nourishment has been completed. 39. EL TUQUE BEACH, P.R. Location. The project area is located at El Tuque Beach on the south coast of Puerto Rico about 5 miles west of the city of Ponce. Existing project. The authorization provides for a protective and recreational beach by the placement of about 60,000 cubic yards of fill material along the eroded shoreline of El Tuque Beach. The new fill will be stabilized by the construction of a shore-connected rubble breakwater at the south end of the beach fill and by an offshore breakwater parallel to the northerly section of shore under consideration. The shoreconnected breakwater would extend seaward a distance of about 900 feet from a point on the shore 300 feet north of the south-west corner of the park. The offshore breakwater would be located about 500 feet offshore, be 1,000 feet in length, and run generally parallel to the northwestern shore. Estimated cost of the project (Jul. 1981 price level) is $968,800 Federal costs and $415,200 non-Federal constribution. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must (a) provide without cost to the United States all necessary lands, easements, rights of way, and relocations required for construction and subsequent mainenance of the project. (b) Hold and save the United States free from all claims for damanges which may result from construction and subsequent mainenance of the project, except damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors. (c) Provide without cost to the United States appropriate access and facilities including parking and sanitation, necessary for realization of the public benefits upon which Federal participation is based, and administer and maintain the beach for continued public use during the economic life of the project. (d) Assume maintenance and repair during the economic life of the project as required to serve the intended purpose. (e) Provide a cash contribution for beach erosion control equal to the appropriate percentage of the final construction cost allocated. This function exclusive of lands, easements, rights-of-way, alterations, and relocations. The percentage to be in accordance with existing law and based on shore ownership and existing at the time of construction, which contribution is presently estimated at $415,200 (30 percent). (f) Assume full responsibility for all 9-21 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT project costs in excess of the Federal cost limitations of $1,000,000 for the Corps of Engineers portion of the work. (g) Comply with the provisons of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (Public Law 91-646). Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs for the year were $26,255 and $855, respectively. 40. FORT PIERCE, FLA. Location. Fort Pierce Beach erosion project fronts the Atlantic Ocean and is on coastal barrier island in St. Lucie County which separates Indian River from the ocean. Area is 120 miles north of Miami and about 225 miles south of Jacksonville. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 582.) Existing project. Provides for Federal participation in the cost of a shore restoration and protection project which involves construction and periodic nourishment for 10 years. Federal participation amounts to one-half such costs for that part of the ocean shoreline extending 1.2 miles southward of Fort Pierce navigation inlet, and 70 percent of such costs for the adjacent 0.1 mile shoreline known as Lions Club Beach Park. Mean range of tide in area is 2.6 feet. Cost estimate (Oct. 1980 price levels) is $2,800,000 Federal and $2,620,000 non-Federal. Project was authorized by 1965 River and Harbor Act (HD 84/89/1) as modified by section 102 of 1968 River and Harbor Act. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute one-half the costs of protecting and periodically nourishing for 10 years the reach of shoreline starting at and extending 1.2 miles south of Fort Pierce Inlet and 30 percent of cost of protecting and periodically nourishing 0.1 mile of shoreline known as Lions Club Beach Park; obtain approval by Chief of Engineers of detailed plans and specifications for the project; establish in public ownership and beach within project limits prior to reimbursement; furnish all lands and rights-of-way; furnish assurances that they will maintain continued public ownership of the publicly owned shores; exclude permanent human habitation and provide full park facilities at the Lions Club Beach Park; provide periodic nourishment of the beach; control water pollution; hold United States free from damages; and execute such further assurances and agreements as may be necessary to carry out the intent of Congress expressed in the acts authorizing or modifying the project. River and Harbor Act of 1965 authorized construction of the project by local interests. Section 102 of 1968 River and Harbor Act modified the project to provide for construction by Secretary of Army and section 215 of the same act permitted construction by local interests. Local interests have elected to construct the project. Assurances of local cooperation were accepted January 2, 1969. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $18,700 and $1,611 respectively. Maintenance: Hired labor surveys, inspections and reports cost $850. Condition at end of fiscal year. Initial beach nourishment has been completed. 41. MANATEE COUNTY FLA. Location. Manatee County is on the west coast of Florida just south of the entrance to Tampa Bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 1256.) Existing project. The authorization provides for Federal participation toward cost of a shore restoration and protection project. The plan provides for the entire 7.5 mile shoreline of Anna Maria Key and will consist of 3.2 miles of gulf shore beach to elevation 6 feet above mean low water with a 50 foot berm width and a natural slope seaward as would be shaped by wave action. Also, the project consists of periodic nourishment of the restored beach and such adjacent shoreline as may be needed and justified for the 50-year project life. Plane of reference is mean low water. Cost estimate for new work (Oct. 1980 price levels) is $7,100,000 Federal and $7,387,000 non- Federal ($7,100,000 contributed funds and $254,000 for other costs). If public ownership of the private beaches is established before construction of the improvements the local share of the estimated first cost of construction and periodic nourishment would be reduced from 85.8 percent to 48.9 percent. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interest must: (a) provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way, including borrow areas, and relocations necessary for construction of the improvements; (b) provide a cash contribution equal to 85.8 percent of the first cost of construction, subject to any credit for eligible construction costs incurred by local interests, and exclusive of costs for lands, easements, rights-ofway, relocations and alterations, the final percentage to be based on shore ownership and use existing at the time of construction; (c) provide a cash contribution for periodic beach nourishment equal to 85.8 percent of the annual nourishment cost, such contribution to be made prior to each 9-22 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT nourishment operation, and the final percentage to be based on shore ownership and use existing at the time of construction; (d) hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction; (e) assure continued public ownership and administration of the shore upon which the amount of Federal participation is based; (f) provide without cost to the United States appropriate access and facilities, including parking and sanitation, necessary for realization of the public benefits upon which Federal participation is based; (g) adopt appropriate ordinances, or provide other means, to insure the intended use of the beach fill areas; and (h) control water pollution to the extent necessary to safeguard the health of bathers. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs for the year were $59 and $8, respectively. 42. PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLA., FROM MARTIN COUNTY LINE OF LAKE WORTH INLET AND FROM SOUTH LAKE WORTH INLET TO BROWARD COUNTY LINE. Location. Palm Beach County is on east coast of Florida about 300 miles south of Jacksonville and 70 miles north of Miami. Northerly reach of the project is separated from the southerly reach by Palm Beach Island. Project consists of about 12.2 miles of ocean coastline. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 1247 and 1248.) Existing project. Provides for Federal participation toward the cost of local shore project for restoration of beaches to a general width of 100 feet with a berm elevation of 10 feet above mean low water, and periodic nourishment for 10 years from the year of initial nourishment, as follows: 4.8 percent of the cost for the Martin County line - Jupiter Inlet segment; 11.6 percent of cost for Jupiter Inlet - Lake Worth Inlet segment; and 5.1 percent for South Lake Worth Inlet -Boca Raton Inlet segment. Mean range of tide is 2.8 feet in the Atlantic Ocean at Palm Beach and 2.3 feet at Boca Raton Inlet. Estimated cost (Oct. 1980 price levels) is $4,380,000 Federal and $18,600,000 cash contribution. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must obtain approval by Chief of Engineers of plans and specifications prior to commencement of work and furnish assurances that they will maintain public ownership of publicly owned shores, maintain protective measures and provide periodic nourishment of protective beaches, and control water pollution. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $32,236 and $4,018, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Local interests provided initial beach fill at Delray Beach which was completed in August 1973. A periodic nourishment contract at Delray Beach was awarded in FY1978 by local interests and the contract has been completed. 43. PINELLAS COUNTY, FLA. Location. Pinellas County is on the Gulf coast of Florida, about midway of the peninsula. It extends northerly about 39 miles from the main entrance to Tampa Bay to the vicinity of the mouth of Anclote river. (See Coast and Geodetic Charts Nos. 858 and 1257.) Previous project. For details see page 429 of Annual Report for 1965. Existing project. The authorized project provides for Federal participation in preserving and protecting the shores of Pinellas County, Florida, by: restoration of 5,000 feet of beach at Clearwater Beach Island; restoration of 49,000 feet of beach at Sand Key; restoration of 9,200 feet of beach at Treasure Island; construction of 600 feet of revetment at Long Key; and advance nourishment of Long Key and periodic nourishment of each island. Estimated cost (Oct. 1980 price levels) is $2,700,000 Federal funds and $24,362,000 non- Federal funds. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must: (a) contribute in cash the required percentages of the first costs of work provided by the Corps of Engineers, the percentages varying with the type of beach ownership; 94.1 to 50 percent of the beach restoration at Clearwater Beach; 98.1 to 50 percent of the improvement at Sand Key; 94.3 to 50 percent of the improvement at Treasure Island; and 50 percent of the first cost of the revetment at Long Key; (b) contribute in cash an amount computed in accordance with the cost sharing provision contained in P.L. 826, 84th Congress as amended by P.L. 87-874, for_beach nourishment cost for the first 10 years of the project lifei (c) provide lands, easements, and rightsof- way; (d) assure maintenance and repair of the stone revetment of Long Key; (e) assure periodic nourishment of the restored beaches; (f) assure public ownership of beaches; (g) assure against water pollution; (h) hold the United States free from damages; and (i) provide beach for public use. Assurances of local cooperation were accepted March 22, 1967. Operations and results during fiscal year. New 9-23 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 work: Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs for the fiscal year were $48,404 and $3,052, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project commenced in 1969 and is 50 percent completed. Total costs under existing project through September 30, 1981 were $1,466,981 Federal funds and $1,424,563 contributed funds for new work and $5,556 for maintenance. 44. PUNTA SALINAS, P.R. Location. The project is located on the north coast of Puerto Rico on the Punta Salinas Peninsula about five miles west of San Juan, Puerto Rico. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 903.) Existing project. Provides for Federal participation in the cost of shore restoration of the east and west shores of the Punta Salinas Recreation Area. The selected plan consists of beach fill (about 58,000 cubic yards) which will provide an average 140,foot protective and recreational beach at MHW for the west peninsula shoreline; two anchor groins 225-feet long and both consisting of 10,500 tons of stone at each end of the west shore to anchor and retard the movement of the fill material and; a stone revetment for 2,500 feet of the east peninsula shore consisting of 5,500 tons of stone and 25,000 square feet of filter cloth to eliminate shoreline recession along this sector. The Federal share for initial construction cost is 70%. The project cost is $1,008,000, including engineering and design and supervision and administration. (See Table 9-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must (a) provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights of way necessary for the construction and subsequent maintenance and nourishment of the project. (b) accomplish without cost to the United States all alterations and locations of buildings, transportation facilities, storm drains, utilities, and other structures, and improvements made necessary by the contruction. (c) Hold and save the United States free from all claims for damages due to constuction and subsequent maintenance of the project, except damages due to the fault of negligence of the United States or its contractors. (d) Provide a cash contribution for beach erosion control equal to the appropriate percentage of the final construction cost allocated to this function exclusive of lands, easements, rights of way, alterations, and relocations. The percentage to be in accordance with shore ownership. The Commonwealth of Puerto Rico has contributed $300,000 which represents 30 percent of the project cost. (e) Provide an additional cash contribution for the cost of periodic beach nourishment every 5 years, presently estimated at $11,900. (30.0 percent) annually, until the $1,000,000 limitation of the Section 103A Small Projects Authority is reached. These percentages also to be revised in accordance with shore ownership and use at the time of construction. (f) Provide without cost to the United States appropriate access and facilities, including parking and sanitation, necessary for realization of the public benefits upon which Federal participation is based, and administer and maintain the beach for continued public use during the life of the project. (g) Adopt appropriate ordinances or provide other means to insure preservation of the beach fill areas, control water pollution to the extent necessary to safeguard the health of bathers, maintain and operate all structures after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army and comply with the provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (Public Law 91-646). Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: A contract for beach nourishment was awarded 15 April 1981 and incurred costs of $246,084 for the fiscal year. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $49,180 and $66,703 respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of project is underway and is scheduled for completion in March 1982. 45. OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 9-J.) 46. BEACH EROSION CONTROL ACTIVITIES UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Beach erosion control activities pursuant to section 103, Public Law 87-874 (preauthorization) Reports incurring costs during the fiscal year were Dunedin Shores, Fla., $60,207, Ft. Clinch State Park, Fla., $41,322, Key Biscayne, Fla., $975 and North Shore Beach, St. Petersburg, Fla., $9,605. Beach erosion control activities pursuant to section III, Public Law 90-483 Mitigation of Shore Damages Attributable to Navigation Projects No costs were incurred under the above authorization. Beach erosion control activities pursuant to Shoreline Erosion Control Act of 1974, Public Law 93-251. 9-24 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT The Shoreline Erosion Control Demonstration Program included costs of $52,728 for Key West, Fla. $976 for demonstration and - $12,648 for Stuart-Jensen Beach, Fla., of which $6,358 are contributed funds. Flood Control 47. CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA Location. The project is located generally within the southeastern eighteen counties of Florida covering an area of about 15,200 square miles. It is comprised of the Upper St. Johns River basin in the northeastern section of project, Kissimmee River basin in central section above the Lake Okeechobee-Everglades area in the central and southwestern section, and the east coast Everglades area in southeastern section. Previous projects. Completed works for control of Lake Okeechobee were included in and constructed under the navigation project for Okeechobee Waterway, Fla. (formerly Caloosahatchee River and Lake Okeechobee drainage area, Fla.) and under provisions of River and Harbor Acts of July 3, 1930, and August 30, 1935. For further information, see Annual Reports, 1948 and 1949. Existing project. The authorized project is for flood relief and water conservation and provides principally for: an east coast protective levee extending from the Homestead area north to the eastern shore of Lake Okeechobee near the St. Lucie Canal; three conservation areas for water impoundment in the Everglades area west of the east coast protective levee with control structures to effect transfer of water as necessary; local protective works along the lower east coast; encirclement of the Lake Okeechobee agricultural area by levees and canals; enlargment of portions of Miami, North New River, Hillsboro, and West Palm Beach Canals; enlargement of the existing Lake Okeechobee levees and construction of new levees on the northeast and northwest shore of the lake; increased outlet capacity for improved control of Lake Okeechobee; floodway channels in the Kissimmee River basin, with suitable control structures to prevent overdrainage; an interrelated system of canals, levees, pumping stations, and structures in southwest Dade County to control water levels; and facilities for regulating floods in the Upper St. Johns River basin; a system of canals and control structures for gravity drainage of Martin County and distribution of available water supplies to portions of Martin and St. Lucie Counties; and works to improve the supply, distribution, and conservation of water resources in central and southern Florida, including the Lake Okeechobee agricultural area, Everglades National Park, and other related areas. The project will provide water control and protection from recurrence of the devastating floodwaters from the Everglades and local sources, for the highly developed urban area along the lower east coast of Florida and for the productive agricultural areas around Lake Okeechobee (including towns around lake), in the Upper St. Johns and Kissimmee River basins, and in South Dade County. Project also provides for navigation improvements suitable for recreational craft, consisting of locks and channel dredging in the upper Kissimmee and St. Johns basins. The project includes a total of 897 miles of levees, 954 miles of canals, 30 pumping plants, 194 floodway control and diversion structures, 55 railroad bridge relocations, and 2 highway bridge relocations. The project also provides that upon completion, local interests assume operation and maintenance of all completed works except levees, channels, locks, and control works for regulation of Lake Okeechobee and the main control structures of conservation areas, which will be operated and maintained by the United States. The principal features of the hurricane gates, constructed under previous projects for Okeechobee Waterway and maintained under existing project since July 1, 1950, are set forth in Table 9-K. See also Table 9-L for principal features of locks and dams. Estimate of cost for new work (Oct. 1980 price levels) is $650,680,000 Federal funds ($649,000,000 Corps and $1,680,000 U.S. Coast Guard) and $163,000,000 contributed funds, exclusive of river and harbor funds expended on previous projects. Local interests' costs in reviewing plans and specifications are expected to be $590,000. In addition, estimated cost to local interests of lands, rights-of-way, and relocations is $152,100,000. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. (See Table 9-M for local cash contribution.) Local interests must also: provide lands, rights-of-way, and spoil disposal areas; hold the United States free from damages; bear the cost of maintenance and operation of all works except those having to do with regulation of Lake Okeechobee and the main control structures of conservation areas; construct and maintain lateral drainage facilities; prohibit encroachment on flood-carrying capacity of the improved channels; and assume cost of all new highway bridges, relocations of existing bridges and alterations to utilities incident to construction of the project. In addition, for small boat navigation channels, local interests must provide, maintain, and operate 9-25 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 adequate public landings, sanitary and access facilities, and establish regulations prohibiting discharge of pollutants into the waters of the locks and channels by users thereof. Assurances of local cooperation have been accepted by the District Engineer for all items of work authorized to date except those for the Small Boat Navigation feature added in 1970 under Section 201 of the Flood Control Act of 1965. Total estimated contributed funds amount to $163,000,000. Operations and results during fiscal year. (See Table 9-N for work accomplished.) Operations and care. a. Features completed under previous navigation project for Okeechobee Waterway and being maintained under this project are: a levee about 70 miles long following in general the south shore of Lake Okeechobee and a north shore levee 15.8 miles long; spillways at Ortona and St. Lucie locks; 5 hurricane gates; 20 gated drainage culverts through the levee; and 16 spillways along St. Lucie Canal. b. Features completed under existing project that are to be maintained with operation and maintenance funds are: (1) Levees 47, 48, 49 and 50 - total length 63 miles and enlargement of existing levees L-D1, L-D2, L-D3, L-D4, and L-D9, (2) spillway structures S-10, S-11, S-12, S-18C, S-77, and S-78 (3) C-43, Sec. 4 (Caloosahatchee River), and (4) W. P. Franklin Lock and Dam. In addition to the actual facilities listed above it is necessary under operation and maintenance to continue meteorological studies, water level records, stream gaging stations, etc., for proper regulation of the level of Lake Okeechobee and storage of water in Conservation Areas 1, 2 and 3. REGULATION Corps of Engineers - The Corps of Engineers operates and maintains the major outlets to Lake Okeechobee and Water Conservation Area Nos. 1, 2A and 3A in central and southern Florida. During the period, Lake Okeechobee continued to be regulated under a regulation schedule ranging from 15.5 feet to 17.5 feet. No regulatory discharges were made through St. Lucie Canal and/or Caloosahatchee River. An extreme drought was experienced in the Lake Okeechobee Drainage Area. As a result, Lake Okeechobee reached a record low stage of 9.75 feet, NGVD on 29 July 1981. Lockages were restricted, and at times stopped copletely, on the Okeechobee Waterway for the purpose of conserving water. Tropical storm Dennis provided some degree of relief in late August by raising lake levels significantly. Flooding was experienced in south Dade County as a result of tropical storm Dennis. Schedules for the water conservation areas remained the same. South Florida Water Management District - SFWMD is responsible for operation and maintenance of the remainder of the project facilties, including major pumping stations, spillways, locks (except on Okeechobee Waterway), levees and culverts. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was about 45 percent complete. Planning for the entire project began in November 1948 and has been continued. For construction completed prior to Fiscal Year 1980 see Annual Reports for 1960-1979. Construction completed under existing project during the fiscal year is set forth in Table 9-0. All Federally maintained features of the project were generally in good condition at the end of the fiscal year. (For status of work under contract at end of fiscal year see Table 9-P.) Total Federal costs under the existing project through September 30, 1981 were $252,728,240 for new work, $30,291,208 for maintenance, a total of $283,019,448. In addition, $47,686,622 has been expended from contributed funds for new work. 48. FOUR RIVER BASINS, FLA. Location. The Four River Basins area covers about 6,000 square miles within 14 counties in central and southwest peninsular Florida. Project includes all or part of the four main stream basins - the Hillsborough, Oklawaha, Withlacoochee, and Peace Rivers-and all of three smaller coastal basins north of Tampa, Florida, drained by the Pithlachascotee and Anclote Rivers and Lake Tarpon. Existing project. The authorized project provides for improvements for control of floods and drainage, and for water conservation through construction of necessary canals, levees, reservoirs, and control structures. More specifically, the project provides for: Green Swamp Area-a conservation area and three storage reservoirs with necessary canals and control structures; Hillsborough River-four flood-storage reservoirs, with necessary channels, control structures, and levees; Oklawaha River-a levee on the north shore of Lake Apopka, improvement of part of the river channel and a west bank levee below Moss Bluff lock and dam, and replacement of the lock and dam; Withlacoochee River-one flood-storage reservoir with outlet canals and control structures; Peace River-Peace Creek canal and control structures and improvements to the existing water control and drainage features; 9-26 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT Gulf Coastal Areas - Lake Tarpon: outlet canal and control structure; Anclote River: control structure and channel improvement; Pithlachascotee River: reservoir with outlet canals and control structures. (See Table 9-Q on Moss Bluff Lock.) Estimated cost for new work (Oct. 1980 price levels) is $166,000,000 Federal funds and $101,500,000 non-Federal cost. $34,000,000 contributed funds; $39,800,000 for lands and damages; and $27,700,000 for relocations. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must furnish all lands, and rights-of-way; provide all alterations or replacements of public and private utilities, roads, bridges (except railroad bridges), etc.; hold the United States free from damages; operate and maintain all project works after completion; construct and maintain such associated works as are necessary to realize benefits made available by the project works; and contribute in cash 17 percent of the first cost of construction ($34,000,000). Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Contract for construction of C-135 Section 4B and L-112 was completed in October 1980 at a cost of $1,000. Contract for construction of S-153 and 163, L-112R & Floodway was completed in May 1981 at a cost of $540,104. Contract for construction of S-159 middle and lower structures was completed in August 1981 at a cost of $4,874,766. Contract for construction of S-159 upper structure was completed in August 1981 at a cost of $881,675. Hired labor operation cost $5,460. Contract for replacement of underground electrical wiring at Moss Bluff Lock and Spillway was awarded in June 1981. Contract costs for the year were $24,497. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $478,524 and $379,426, respectively. (Included $14,141 for recreation at Moss Bluff.) Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project commenced April 18, 1966 and is 36 percent complete. See Table 9-R for construction of major features of the project completed to date. 49. PORTUGUES AND BUCANA RIVERS P.R. (This project authorized as Lago de Cerrillos, Lago de Portugues, and Channel Improvement at Ponce.) Location. Portugues and Bucana Rivers originate on the southern slopes of Cordillera Central divide of Puerto Rico and flow from this central ridge of the island to the Carribean Sea. Their drainage areas are 22.6 and 31.4 square miles, respectively. Ponce, the second largest city in Puerto Rico, is located in the lower coastal area along Portugues River and is the only urban community in the two basins. Existing project. The authorized project provides for two multiple-purpose reservoirs for flood control, water supply, general recreation, and fish and wildlife enhancement-one on Portugues River and the other on Cerrillos River, a tributary to the Bucana River; enlargement of about 5.7 miles of the Bucana River, with an additional 0.2-mile tieback levee at the upstream terminus of the improvement; enlargement of 2.1 miles of the Portugues River, with an additional 0.5 mile of tieback levee at the upstream terminus of the improvement; and a 1.3 mile diversion channel connecting Portugues River to lower Bucana River. Estimated cost of the project (Oct. 1980 price levels) is $217,000,000 Federal cost and $62,800,000 non-Federal cost ($44,618,000 for lands and damages; $4,818,000 for relocations; and $8,364,000 for highway bridges). (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must provide all lands, easements and rights-of-way; hold the United States free from damages; operate and maintain all project works after completion; repay construction cost allocated to water supply in accordance with Water Supply Act of 1958; pay one-half of the separable cost allocated to recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement; prohibit discharge of inadequately treated sewage and other pollutants into the reservoir; and prevent encroachment on downstream channels. Assurances of local cooperation have not been accepted. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Contract work for improvement on the Upper Bucana Channel, Section 3, Section 4 and Section 5B continued with costs for the year of $2,658,655, $973,514 and $577,999, respectively. A contract for improvement on the Upper Bucana Channel, Section 5A was completed in September 1981 at a cost of $1,099,999, Contract costs for excavation at highway bridge were $2,100. Contract work for improvement on the Upper Bucana Channel, Section 5C was awarded July 15, 1981 with costs of $197,508. Contract for landscape development and fencing of lower channel improvements was awarded August 11, 1981 with costs of $75,000 for the year. Contract for improvement on the Upper Portugues Channel improvement Section 6A was awarded August 13, 1981 at a contract cost of $50,000. Contract for providing test quarries and test fills a Cerrillos Dam was awarded September 24, 1981, but no costs were incurred during the year. Miscellaneous hired labor costs roe channel improve- 9-27 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 ment cost $42. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $3,751,915 and $1,307,971, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project commenced in September 1975 and is 23 percent complete. 50. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Features transferred to the Central and Southern Florida Flood Control District and Southwest Florida Water Management District were inspected quarterly during the fiscal year at a total cost of $6,770. 51. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 9-S.) 52. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to section 205, Public Law 685, 84th Congress, as amended (preauthorization). (See Table 9-T.) Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress and antecedent legislation). Federal costs for the fiscal year were $165,957 for the Disaster Preparedness Program, $12,561 for emergency operation,s $2,856 for national emergency preparedness program, and $550,735 for a rehabilitation report for Central and Southern Florida project for a total of $732,109. General Investigations 53. SURVEYS Hired labor costs during the fiscal year (all Federal funds) were: navigation studies, $608,336, flood damage prevention studies $2,101,789, shoreline protection studies, $216,542 and special studies $425,144 for a total of $3,351,816. 54. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Costs for Inspection of Dams amounted to $104,165. The requirement for preparation of regular flood plain information studies has been rescinded. FPI studies that deal with land use changes will continue to be prepared. FPMS Unit Jacksonville, Fla., $49,801. Gold coast hurricane evacuation study, $69, 164. Technical services, $155,200. 9-28 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT TABLE 9-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 Sept. 30, 1981 1. 10. Fort Pierce Harbor, Fla. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) Aquatic Plant Control (R&H Act of 1965) (Federal Funds) Arecibo Harbor, P.R. (Federal Funds) Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway between Norfolk, Va. and St. John's River, Fla. (Federal Funds) Canaveral Harbor, Fla. (Federal Funds) Channel from Naples to Big Marco Pass, Fla. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) Charlotte Harbor, Fla. (Federal Funds) Cross-Florida Barge Canal (Federal Funds) Fernandina Harbor, Fla. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) Fort Myers Beach, Fla. (Federal Funds) 906,000 2,549,000 2,225,000 2,028,100 11,356,270 887,566 2,317,673 2,339,816 2,077,761 11,262,337 3. 81 - 899 - New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 199,997 199,179 6,912 6,912 - 211,269 - 217,311 2,070 2,070 53,939 53,541 733,425 735,539 839,600 852,907 295,000 113,189 223,883 236,042 7,199 7,199 402,000 400,980 578 4,500 442 4,431 116,200 108,496 2,320,000 1,017,033 85,805 49,790 - 67,947 - 67,411 467 932,568 921,118 700,000 88,092 1,719,600 1,750,655 700,000 199,751 70,000 33,978 141,000 148,660 5,061,000 4,342,280 525,255 561,201 770,800 771,152 1,365,800 1,324,473 - 254,000 554,528 2,343,300 2,343,679 105,000 524,765 371,700 407,661 9-29 571,742 31,172 126,784 126,804 1,447,700 3,468,328 7,131 5,631 788,200 757,998 1,262,308 1,313,848 20,494 4,040,000 4,037,075 72,130 5,365 5,293 173,015 169,816 1,128,07538 1,128,07538 1,681,379 1,140,809 361,2252 361,2252 1,646,668 1,646,644 7,341,9103 7,341,9103 20,398,831 20,389,073 305,290 305,290 910,798 909,229 159,975 159,975 533,169 533,169 5,914,526 5,884,259 62,842,473 62,838,471 10,862,116 10,847,081 4,149,816 4,087,6168 13,087,439 13,084,501 805,000 796,646 158,1407 158,140 648,671 648,538 356,056 356,056 2,403,872 2,400,604 18,574 18,574 5. 6. 7. REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 9-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Project 11. Intracoastal Waterway, Caloosahatchee River to Anclote River, Fla. (Federal Funds) 12. Intracoastal Waterway, Jacksonville to Miami, Fla. (Federal Funds) 13. Jacksonville Harbor, Fla. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 14. Johns Pass, Fla. (Federal Funds) 15. Longboat Pass, Fla. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 16. Mayaguez Harbor, P.R. (Federal Funds) 17. Miami Harbor, Fla. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 18. New Pass Sarasota, Fla. (Federal Funds) 19. Okeechobee Waterway, Fla. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) Funding FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 1,415,000 1,267,271 3,138,175 3,037,904 - 313,000 1,429,511 - 1,550,000 - 1,113,940 103,406 3,778 3,778 - 95,767 605,552 95,812 197,388 197,236 - 72,112 235,314 13,979 13,979 60,000 66,661 1,064 53,733 50,000 63,756 925,600 856,189 214,607 371,683 3,000 2,004 2,770,000 2,764,574 - 97,500 393,720 440,110 443,550 11,728 1,500 1,157 70,000 37,340 13,763 13,763 5,038 5,190 - 146,035 - 146,030 5,789 5,789 85,464 156,501 4,502 4,502 510,000 39,768 1,813,114 1,037,318 94,300 93,935 28,843 1,206,000 1,968,713 1,293 185,000 186,330 287 798,000 828,885 - 63,613 - 63,404 4,711,635 2,819,143 43,986 268,800 301,415 41,887 41,869 5,327 1, 1, Se Seto 9-30 23 Total Cost to FY 81 Sept. 30, 1981 - 8,112,5578 - 8,112,5578 52,500 4,654,1119 55,625 4,653,999' - 19,251,59810 - 19,250,88910 688,908 22,196,803" 759,084 22,178,834" - 47,596,27812 - 47,596,27812 ,441,000 37,079,58613 3,471,235 36,214,17913 - 102,813 - 102,813 - 927,654 - 927,65414 - 82,09815 - 81,755 41,184 414,900 35,128 408,799 - 1,020,233 - 1,020,233 85,726 141,376 47,595 103,227 - 172,324 - 172,324 - 168,187 - 168,187 266,900 930,982 24,865 690,474 150,000 24,416,0665 24,282 24,290,3485 25,047 2,146,312 25,047 2,146,312 - 2,262,71039 - 2,262,71039 - 45,811"6 - 45,811 95,000 1,435,172 33,911 1,373,718 - 72,000 21,320,590'7 398,921 21,301,507'7 469,000 22,691,66618 ,318,044 22,455,74318 - 503,700 - 503,700 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT TABLE 9-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Oklawaha River, Fla. (Federal Funds) 21. Palm Beach Harbor, Fla. (Federal Funds) 22. Ponce de Leon Inlet, Fla. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 23. Ponce Harbor, P. R. (Federal Funds) 24. Port Everglades Harbor, Fla. (Federal Funds) 25. Removal of Aquatic Growth (Federal Funds) 26. St. Augustine Harbor, Fla. (Federal Funds) 27. St. Johns River, Fla. Jacksonville to Lake Harney (Federal Funds) 28. St. Lucie Inlet, Fla. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 29. St. Petersburg Harbor, Fla. (Federal Funds) 30. San Juan Harbor, P. R. (Federal Funds) 20. FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 Sept. 30, 1981 23,600 23,588 366,700 367,465 22,000 20,690 256,900 256,842 Funding New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp Cost New Work; Approp. Cost 10,000 2,992 218,000 231,738 1,580,000 1,501,274 107,000 5,298 5,298 - 50,000 64,543 303,974 303,544 1,950,000 1,971,279 188,000 187,913 22,723 23,709 30,000 66,694 500,000 496,969 21,283 15,876 13,725 19,918 27,368 10,788 11,191 1,010,000 1,136,384 469,409 98,000 96,404 3,602 3,602 530,000 76,296 1,176 1,588 2,500,000 2,415,309 696,000 83,499 1,350,000 305,918 183,070 186,845 540,000 126,739 66,500 68,076 315,264'o 315,26419 1,907,68620 1,906,36420 6,904,02121 6,904,02121 3,432,20922 3,432,11422 1,953,277 1,953,277 5,629,464 5,589,826 2,415,600 2,415,600 1,379,000 597,038 390,88223 365,93923 1,225,621 983,957 26,773,77324 23,889,01924 1,040,558 1,040,558 16,336,370 16,071,863 1,476,43425 1,476,43425 4,144,515 4,144,499 1,171,24340 1,171,24340 898,35741 898,30641 6,263,6022" 5,689,76328 2,199,949 2,175,903 1,815,000 1,815,000 255,95727 255,60827 1,660,348"8 1,660,31928 13,774,968"2 13,774,9682" 161,400 253,700 164,883 214,089 37,887 - - 20,629 125,000 - 20,000 61,803 19,850 1,325 261,300 1,325 19,636 13,058,000 6,245,000 9,025,007 7,863,324 165 35,906 183 35,906 2,400,000 2,646,000 2,312,103 2,569,449 9-31 402,200 1,014,901 1,400,000 1,083,350 63,700 63,629 346,935 1,375,000 53,753 48,100 48,122 21,000 20,949 3,110,000 3,897,422 66,400 42,425 1,200,000 1,266,817 95,000 1,416,793 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 9-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text 30. (Cont.) Project 31. Tampa Harbor, Fla. (Main Project) (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 35. Brevard County, Fla. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 36. Broward County. Fla. Beach Erosion Control and Hillsboro Inlet, Fla., Navigation Project (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 37. Dade County, Fla. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 38. Duval County. Fla. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 39. El Tuque Beach Ponce, Puerto Rico (Federal Funds) 40. Ft. Pierce, Fla. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 41. Manatee County, Fla. (Federal Funds) 42. Palm Beach County, Fla. from Martin County line to Lake Worth Inlet to Broward County line (Federal Funds) Funding Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost 2,443, 1,937, 2,979,( 2,173,: 600,( 2,395, 2,300, 1,915, 8, 50, 18, 120,( 107, 956 3,900,000 473 4,473,050 000 1,450,000 272 3,702,699 000 1,974,650 167 1,596,786 000 955 1,108,286 68,000 282 29,748 000 25,000 229 55,200 200 27,980 200 27,980 000 2,000 352 51,189 900,000 729,296 57 57 9-32 FY 78 1,651,449 1,651,417 15,084,740 17,637,704 - 649,000 - 692,877 143,000 105,067 26,483 157 157 41,541 1,950,000 1,913,144 65 65 FY 79 82,128 79,696 32,895,000 33,030,922 974,956 1,028,633 152,460 198,480 1,400,000 23,518 15,519 15,519 18,860 22,372 211 211 FY 80 2,208,000 2,210,323 11,293,100 10,203,797 337,100 334,640 150,000 58,746 425,000 204,992 12,833 12,833 1,701,000 19,204 2,850,000 2,857,832 12,951 12,951 2,720,000 3,097,753 2,201,600 2,276,480 - 400,750 1,275,084 844,575 41,000 45,112 773,000 749,324 295 295 908,000 732,098 25,000 21,066 112,621 13,115 13,115 1 Total Cost to FY 81 Sept. 30, 1981 1,457,000 11,943,78430 24,139 10,510,78230 14,171,000 116,218,6433' L3,377,011 114,316,41731 2,818,200 14,640,82232 356,616 12,176,62032 - 569,962 84,224 538,336 - 2,346,492 1,521,026 2,252,088 184 28,693 184 28,693 - 65,000 2,262,000 1,697,918 2,234,677 550,000 6,253,100 495,094 6,191,536 6 18,296 6 18,296 - 1,758,841' - 1,758,841' 9,300,000 23,938,95633 9,323,362 23,891,28833 7,661,454 17,144,08534 7,094,928 16,481,11634 90,000 5,768,900 107,293 5,750,977 - 300,000 4,142,400 152,123 4,062,138 -7,000 151,5607 27,110 151,3167 - 1,175,44835 - 3,469 1,146,73235 850 31,734 850 31,734 - 135,000 773,000 23,780 755,878 - 222,000 67 217,576 - 1,830,834 36,252 1,808,980 - 13,621 - 13,621 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT TABLE 9-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 Sept. 30, 1981 43. Pinellas County, New Work: Fla. Approp. 180,000 380,000 - - 1,539,693 (Federal Funds) Cost 77,866 93,081 306,710 32,235 1,466,981 Maint: Approp. 2,184 386 1,761 - 5,556 Cost 2,184 386 1,761 - 5,556 (Contrib. Funds) New Work: Approp. 72,000 432,000 - - 77,428 1,425,755 Cost 44,961 112,765 290,803 19,221 1,424,563 44. Punta Salinas New Work: Puerto Rico Approp. - 37,000 590,000 150,000 842,0007 (Federal Funds) Cost - 21,732 61,596 250,376 398,7927 Maint: Approp. - - - - - Cost - - - - - (Contrib. Funds) New Work: Approp. - - - 330,000 330,000 Cost - - - 111,391 111,391 47. Central and New Work: Southern Florida Approp. 6,506,000 6,105,000 6,070,000 6,040,000 253,276,39738 (Federal Funds) Cost 8,235,534 7,145,663 5,891,260 5,721,682 252,728,24036 Maint: Approp. 2,317,000 2,696,000 4,681,500 2,910,600 30,381,961 Cost 2,336,408 2,602,459 4,372,350 3,353,047 30,291,208 (Contrib. Funds) New Work: Approp. 1,748,300 1,215,000 - 900,500 48,629,575 Cost 1,585,151 1,402,144 1,222,330 992,533 47,686,622 48. Four River New Work: Basins, Fla. Approp. 4,093,445 3,010,350 7,476,000 6,015,000 " 67,012,095 (Federal Funds) Cost 6,647,101 5,423,550 7,395,814 6,037,006 66,788,86437 (Contrib. Funds) New Work: Approp. 5,514 598,789 1,007,225 1,182,970 10,937,300 Cost 610,848 .826,279 1,295,292 1,148,446 10,747,920 49. Portugues and New Work: Bucana Rivers, Approp. 5,594,000 6,060,000 9,940,000 11,600,000 45,535,568 P. R. Cost 5,145,594 8,547,368 9,973,955 10,694,703 44,539,025 (Federal Funds) 9-33 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 1. Excludes work-in-kind. 2. Includes $97,566 for previous project. 3. Excludes $700,000 contributed by NASA in connection with construction of lock and $1,003,000 contributed funds for new work. 4. Includes $113,000 for new work on previous project; excludes $15,563 expended for new work on existing project from contributed funds. 5. Includes $2,202,126 expended from public work funds for new work. Includes costs of $452,500 for recreation facilities. 6. Includes $135,686 expended for recreation facilities. 7. Includes $10,128 cost for reconnaissance and detailed project report prepared under Sec. 107 modification to the project. Excludes $1,095 contributed funds for new work. 8. Includes $515,479 for new work for previous projects: $8,472 for new work on Sunshine Skyway Channel; and $9,707 for new work for Cats Point Channel. Excludes $14,473 contributed funds for new work. 9. Includes $450,749 for maintenance for previous project. 10. Includes $94,776 for work for previous projects. 11. Includes $213,222 for maintenance on previous projects and $3,179 operating and care under provisions of permanent indefinite appropriation. 12. Includes $3,520,137 new work on previous project and $290,013 for new work expended from public works funds. 13. Includes $543,399 maintenance on previous projects. 14. Includes unused contributed funds of $64,136 returned to local interests. 15. Project authorized December 2, 1964, by Chief of Engineers under Section 107 of 1960 R&H Act and by Section 110 of the 1966 R&H Act. Cost of new work excludes $53,732 contributed funds. 16. Excludes $45,811 contributed funds for new work. 17. Includes $16,222,275 for new work under previous project, $549,348 for recreational facilities (Code 710), and $27,574 for reconnaissance and detailed project report prepared under Section 107 modification to the project. 18. Includes $7,581,150 for maintenance for previous projects. Excludes $1,000 for maintenance from contributed funds on previous projects and $67,558 which represents services rendered without reimbursement. 19. Includes $3,912 for new work for previous projects. 20. Includes $11,414 for operating and care under provisions for the permanent indefinite appropriation. 21. Includes $80,000 new work from public works funds. Excludes $509,506 contributed funds. 22. Includes $30,000 for maintenance from public works funds. 23. Includes $11,588 expended for restudy, but excludes $21,960 expended for new work from contributed funds. 24. Excludes $323,456 contributed funds. 25. Includes $71,303 for new work on previous project. Excludes $137,500 contributed funds. 26. Includes $26,689 for new work under previous project. 27. Includes $32,689 under previous project. 28. Includes $20,532 under previous project. 29. Includes $747,684 for new work under previous project. Excludes $100,000 expended for new work from contributed funds. 30. Includes $44,730 in maintenance under previous project. 31. Includes $853,050 for new work under previous project. Excludes $270,466 for new work for Hillsborough River and $13,939 for new work from contributed funds. 32. Includes $17,107 for maintenance under previous project. 33. Includes $2,299,526 for reimbursement costs to Bal Harbor. 34. Excludes unused contributed funds of $17,969 returned to local interests. 35. Excludes $300,083 in property for services furnished by local interests in lieu of cash contribution. 36. Excludes $15,543 for property received without reimbursement and R&H Funds, expended on previous projects (see cost and financial statement for Okeechobee Waterway, Fla., project for these costs). Excludes $100,000 advanced by local interests toward federal costs. 37. Includes costs of $67,127 for recreation facilities at Moss Bluff and $2,638,272 at Lake Tarpon. 38. Excludes $288,000 contributed funds for new work. 39. Includes $343,479 work-in-kind and $160,429 in costs for north jetty recreation facility. 40. Baresford cutoff and completion of cutoffs and easing of bends in Putnam Lake and Volusia Counties in inactive status. Includes $29,566 for new work under previous project. 41. Includes $25,838 under previous project. 9-34 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents October 27, 1965 August 26, 1937 March 4, 1913 June 20, 1939 March 2, 1945 October 23, 1962 June 20, 1938 July 14, 1960 July 25, 1912 March 3, 1925 July 3, 1930 August 26, 1937 May 17, 1950 July 14, 1960 P.L. 67.5/77 July 23, 1942 June 14, 1880 July 13, 1892 March 2, 1907 June 25, 1910 March 3, 1925 June 20, 1938 AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (See Section 1 of Text) Control and progressive eradication of obnoxious aquatic plants, and continued research to develop best method of control ARECIBO HARBOR, P.R. (See Section 2 of Text) Construction of breakwater 1,200 feet long and dredging channel 25 feet deep and 400 feet wide with flare at entrance and widening at inner end to form a maneuvering area. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA. AND THE ST. JOHNS RIVER, FLA. (See Section 2 of Text) Channel 7 x 100 feet Channel 12 feet deep and 90-150 feet wide with cut-offs CANAVERAL HARBOR, FLA. (See Section 3 of Text) Entrance channel jetties, a turning basin enclosed by a dike, and a barge canal with a lock Maintain improved channel, turning basin, enlarge barge channel and lock, relocate dike, provide channel and turning basin west of 35-foot turning basin, construct and operate sand-transfer plant CHANNEL FROM NAPLES TO BIG MARCO PASS, FLA. (See Section 4 of Text) Interior channel 6 x 70 feet Channel 12 x 150 feet from the Gulf to Gordon Pass, thence 10 x 100 feet to a point 400 feet south of U.S. Highway 41 Bridge, thence 10 x 70 feet to bridge and two turning basins CHARLOTTE HARBOR, FLA. (See Section 5 of Text) Channel 24 x 300 feet through Gulf through Boca Grande entrance Depth of 27 feet at entrance and width of 500 feet at the bend Channel 10 x 100 feet to Punta Gorda and a turning basin Depth of 30 feet at entrance and width of 700 feet at bend Depth of 32 feet in entrance channel CLEARWATER PASS, FLA. (See Section 6 of Text) Entrance channel 10 x 150 feet, inside channel 8 x 100 feet, and a turning basin CROSS-FLORIDA BARGE CANAL (See Section 7 of Text) Barge Canal 12 x 150 feet FERNANDINA HARBOR, FLA. (See Section 8 of Text) Entrance jetties Raising and extending jetties to provide 19-foot depth Improvement of inner harbor to obtain 20- to 24-foot depth and 400- to 600-foot channel width Combining improvement of Fernandina Harbor and Cumberland Sound under the general heading of Fernandina Harbor Provided for a 26-foot channel Provided for the 28-foot channel and turning basin H. Doc. 251, 89th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers & Harbors Committee Doc. 43, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 898, 62nd Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 618, 75th Cong., 3d sess. H.Doc. 367, 77th Cong., 1st sess. S.Doc. 140, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 596, 75th Cong., 3d sess. H.Doc. 183, 86th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 699, 62nd Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 113, 66th Cong. 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 1, 70th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 95, 74th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 186, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 293, 86th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 109, 79th Cong., 1st sess. Annual Report 1879 Annual Report 1891 & 1896 H.Doc. 388, 59th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 227, 68th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 284, 87th Cong., 1st sess. 9-35 TABLE 9-B REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 9-B IContined) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents March 2, 1945 May 17, 1950 July 14, 1960 Auth. by Chief of Engineers December 6, 1968, under Sec. 107 of 1960 R&H Act. Def. Act of March 4, 1931 War Dept. Approp. Act, March 4, 1933 August 30, 1935 March 2, 1945 June 30, 1948 May 17, 1950 September 3, 1954 May 10-16, 1957 Auth. March 1, 1962 By Senate and House Public Works Committee Auth. by Chief of Engineers March 1, 1963, under Sec. 107 of 1960 R&H Act Provided for reducing the maximum width of turning basin from 1,000 to 800 feet, for shifting channel line in this vicinity 50 feet northwesterly and for including in authorized project small area dredged by Rayonier, Inc. Provided for 32-foot channel and turning basin FORT MYERS BEACH, FLA. (See Section 9 of Text) 12- x 150 foot channel in San Carlos Bay, thence 11 x 125 feet in Matanzas Pass to upper shrimp terminals Extension of 11- x 125-foot channel easterly about 2,000 feet to and including a turning basin adjacent to natural deep water in Matanzas Pass FORT PIERCE HARBOR, FLA. (See Section 10 of Text) Expenditure of $20,000 for dredging channel, maintenance by local interests Expenditure of up to $30,000 for dredging channel Maintaining channels, jetties, and revetments, and enlarging channels and turning basin to existing project dimensions INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, CALOOSAHATCHEE RIVER TO ANCLOTE RIVER, FLA. (See Section 11 of Text) 9- x 100-foot channel; deepening channel at Caseys Pass to 9 feet and construction of highway bridge at Venice Original route may be modified at no excess cost to U. S. Any route in Venice-Lemon Bay area may be used Use of alternate Route C-i in Venice-Lemon Bay area Local interests to bear costs of Venice Avenue highway bridge and any other necessary crossing over Route C-i Sunshine Skyway Channel to be improved and maintained to 9 x 100 feet H.Doc. 284, 87th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 662, 80th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 183, 86th Cong., 1st sess. Specified in Act Specified in Act H. Doc. 252, 72nd Cong., 1st sess. and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 21, 74th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 371, 76th Cong., 1st sess. Specified in Act Specified in Act Specified in Act H.Doc. 109, 85th Cong., 1st sess. 6- x 80-foot channel in Boca Ciega Bay January 21, 1927 July 3, 1930 PARA June 26, 1934 August 26, 1937 March 2, 1945 Do. INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, JACKSONVILLE TO MIAMI, FLA. (See Section 12 of Text) Channel 8 x 75 feet from Jacksonville to Miami Channel width of 100 feet Operation and care of Palm Balley Bridge Turning basin at Jacksonville Beach Channel 12 x 125 feet Side channel and turning basin at Sebastian H.Doc. 586, 69th Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc. 71, 71st Cong., 2d sess. Specified in Act H.Doc. 180, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 740, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 336, 76th Cong., 1st sess. 9-36 TABLE 9-B (Contined) JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Do. Turning basin at Vero Beach July 3, 1958 Chief of Engineers Report of July 22, 1960, Mod. 12-foot channel March 2, 1907 June 14, 1880 June 3, 1896 June 25, 1910 June 5, 1920 July 3, 1930 August 30, 1935 March 2, 1945 Do. Do. October 27, 1965 Auth. by Chief of Engineers December 2, 1964 Under Sec. 107 of 1960 R&H Act and Sec. 110 of 1966 R&H Act. Auth. by Chief of Engineers April 20, 1976 under Sec. 107 of 1960 R&H Act, as amended August 30, 1935 Maintenance of side channel at Daytona Beach Channel 10 x 125 feet from Ft. Pierce to Miami JACKSONVILLE HARBOR, FLA. (See Section 13 of Text) ST. JOHNS RIVER, FLA. OPPOSITE THE CITY OF JACKSONVILLE The 24-foot area from Hogan Creek to Florida East Coast Railroad bridge ST. JOHNS RIVER, FLA. Jetties at entrance (maintenance only) Extension of jetties, etc. (maintenance only) Main channel 30 by 300-600 feet; anchorage basin at Mayport; and training walls and revetments ST. JOHNS RIVER, FLA., JACKSONVILLE TO THE OCEAN Consolidation of above projects Widening bend at Dame Point to 900 feet Widening Drummond, Trout, and Six Mile (now Long Branch) Creeks Cut to 400 feet; and Terminal Channel 30 by 400 feet Maintenance of existing channel widths; widening Terminal Channel to 590 feet; the 28-foot area between Laura St. and St. Elmo W. Acosta Bridge; channel along south side of Commodore Point; and basin at Naval Reserve Armory Main channel 34 feet deep via Terminal Channel Dame Point-Fulton Cutoff 34 by 500 feet Maintain existing entrance channel depths of 40 and 42 feet; deepen main ship channel to 38 feet to Mile 20 and widen channel near Mile 5 and near Mile 7 JOHN'S PASS, FLA. (See Section 14 of Text) Channel 10 x 150 feet in the gulf, 8 x 100 feet inside pass, 6 x 100 feet to IWW-2.6 miles long LONGBOAT PASS, FLA. (See Section 15 of Text) 12- x 150-foot entrance channel from Gulf of Mexico to Longboat Bridge; 10- x 100-foot channel from Longboat Bridge northeasterly to IWW; channel from north channel to Cortez Bridge MAYAGUEZ HARBOR P.R. (See Section 16 of Text) Approach channel 30 feet deep to and along deep water terminal H.Doc. 261, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 222, 85th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 663, 59th Cong., 1st sess. Annual Report 1879, p. 767 H.Ex.Doc. 346, 53rd Cong., 3d sess., and Annual Report 1895, p. 1586 H.Doc. 611, 61st Cong., 2d sess. Specified in Act H.Doc. 483, 70th Cong. 2d sess. S.Comm. print, 74th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 322, 77th Cong., 1st sess. S.Doc. 230, 78th Cong. 2d sess. S.Doc. 179, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 214, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 215, 72nd Cong. 1st sess. & River and Harbor Committee Doc. 1, 73rd Cong., 1st sess. 9-37 TABLE 9-B (Contined) REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents July 3, 1930 PWA Program September 6, 1933 June 13, 1902 March 2, 1907 March 4, 1913 March 3, 1925 July 3, 1930 August 30, 1935 August 26, 1937 March 2, 1945 March 2, 1945 July 14, 1960 August 13, 1968 Auth. by Chief of Engineers April 20, 1964 under Sec. 107 of 1960 R&H Act PARA June 26, 1934 August 26, 1937 March 2, 1945 Do. March 2, 1945 Do. MIAMI HARBOR, FLA. (See Section 14 of Text) MIAMI RIVER The 15-foot channel in Miami River, 150 feet wide at the mouth The channel at the Dinner Key Airport An 18-foot channel in a landcut across the peninsula and construction of the north jetty Construction of the south jetty and increase of channel width to 100 feet Modification of local cooperation requirements imposed by the Act of July 25, 1912 A channel 25 feet deep with present widths from the ocean to Biscayne Bay, thence 200 feet wide across the bay to but not including the municipal turning basin, and extension of both jetties A channel width of 300 feet across the bay and enlarging the municipal turning basin, with expenditures thereon limited to $200,000 A depth of 30 feet from the ocean to and in the turning basin, with the existing authorized project widths, including the 300-foot width in the channel across the bay Extending the turning basin 200 feet to the southward The Virginia Key improvement For incorporation of the project for Miami River in that for Miami Harbor, the widening at the mouth of Miami River to existing project widths; the channels from the mouth of Miami River to the turning basin and to Government Cut; and the channel from Miami River to the harbor of refuge, provided that local interest contribute one-third of the cost Deletion of Virginia Key development and the Dinner Key approach channel, widening the existing ship channel by easing the ocean bend and increasing the width of the 300-foot-wide section to 400 feet, enlarging the existing turning basin 300 feet along both the south and northeasterly sides, and dredging a turning basin along the north side of Fisher Island about 39 acres in extent and 30 feet in depth Enlarging existing entrance channel to 38 x 500 feet, deepening existing 400-foot-wide channel across Biscayne Bay to 36 feet; deepening existing turning basins at Biscayne Blvd. terminal and Fisher Island to 36 feet NEW PASS, SARASOTA, FLA. (See Section 16 of Text) 10- x 150-foot entrance channel; 8- x 100-foot inner channels; and 8-footdeep turning basins at Payne Terminal and City Pier OKEECHOBEE WATERWAY, FLA. (See Section 17 of Text) Operation and care of locks and dams provided for with funds from R&H appropriations New lock and weir structure in St. Lucie Canal Deepening to 8 feet from Ft. Myers to Jacksonville-Miami waterway near Stuart via channel across lake from Clewiston Channel to yacht basin at Ft. Myers and a basin at Stuart Deepening to 8 feet from Ft. Myers to Jacksonville-Miami waterway near Stuart via channel across lake from Clewiston Channel to yacht basin at Ft. Myers and a basin at Stuart Specified in Act S.Doc. 95, 72d Cong., 1st sess. and specified in Act H.Doc. 622, 56th Cong., 1st sess. (Annual Report 1900, p. 1987) Specified in Act Specified in Act H.Doc. 516, 67th Cong., 4th sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 15, 71st Cong., 2d sess. Sen. Comm. Print. 73d Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 86, 74th Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc. 251, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 91, 79th Cong., 1st sess. S.Doc. 71, 85th Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc. 93, 90th Cong., 2d sess. Specified in Act Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 28, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 696, 76th Cong., 3d sess. H.Doc. 76, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 696, 76th Cong., 3d sess. H.Doc. 76, 79th Cong., 2d sess. 9-38 TABLE 9-B (Contined) JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Auth. by Chief of Engineers November 5, 1968, under Sec. 107 of 1960 R&H Act September 19, 1890 March 2, 1907 June 25, 1910 July 25, 1912 July 27, 1916 PARA June 26, 1934 March 13, 1934 December 10, 1934 August 30, 1935 March 2, 1945 May 17, 1950 July 14, 1960 October 27, 1965 March 3, 1925 August 30, 1935 March 2, 1945 H.R. September 23, 1976 S.R. October 1, 1976 Enlarge existing 8- x 90-foot section of Okeechobee Waterway for about 5 miles upstream from Ft. Myers to 10 x 100 feet OKLAWAHA RIVER, FLA. (See Section 18 of Text) Clearing obstructions for channel 4 feet deep from mouth to Leesburg Channel 6 feet deep from mouth to head of Silver Springs Run Maintenance of levels in the lakes at head of river Acceptance of certain artificial waterways in lieu of portions of natural river bed Operation and care of lock and dam provided for with funds from appropriations for rivers and harbors PALM BEACH HARBOR, FLA. (See Section 19 of Text) Maintenance of improvement previously constructed by local interests Deepening the channels and turning basin, as constructed by local interests, to 20 feet Authorized the work previously approved by Public Works Administration, and widening the channels to existing project dimensions, enlarging the 700-foot-square turning basin eastward removing the obstructive point on south side of the inlet, revetting the banks of the inlet, and restoring existing jetties Deepening the channels and turning basin to 25 feet Extending the turning basin 550 feet southward over a 900-foot width, with a flare to the east; provided that local interests may be reimbursed not to exceed $305,000 for work done by them on this modification subsequent to July 1, 1949 An entrance channel 35 feet deep, 400 feet wide, and 0.8 mile long, merging with an inner channel 33 feet deep, 300 feet wide and 0.3 mile long, thence flaring into a turning basin, 1,400 feet north-south by a minimum of 1,200 feet east-west PONCE DE LEON INLET, FLA. (See Section 20 of Text) Widening and deepening channels; jetties on north and south side of inlet; a weir in the north jetty and an impoundment basin inside the weir PONCE HARBOR, P.R. (See Section 21 of Text) Dredging 3 continuous areas, aggregating 153 acres, to depths of 30, 18, and 9 feet, and construction of a seawall, costs to be shared by U.S. and local interests Modified conditions of local cooperation to provide that U.S. undertake all dredging at Federal expense and return local funds previously contributed for dredging, all other portions of the improvement hereafter to be at the expense of local interests Eliminate previously authorized 9-foot dredging area, and provided for dredging 30-foot-depth area and 18 acres off the municipal pier and for construction of the breakwater off Punta Carenero Eliminate previously authorized 18-foot and a portion of the 30-foot project outside the proposed 36-foot and a portion of the adjacent to the municipal bulkhead. Channel 36 x 600 feet from Caribbean Sea to harbor; channel 36 x 400 feet into harbor; and a 36-foot turning basin. Annual Report 1889, p. 1360 H.Doc. 782, 59th Cong., 1st sess. Specified in Acts Specified in Act Specified in Act H.Doc. 185, 73d Cong., 2d sess. Recommended by Chief of Engineers to Public Works Administration October 17, 1934 H.Doc. 185. 73d Cong., 2d sess. and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 42, 74th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 530, 78th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 705, 80th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 283, 86th Cong., 1st sess. (contains latest published map) H.Doc. 74, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 532, 67th Cong., 4th sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 18, 72d Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 745, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 532, 94th Cong., 2d sess. 9-39 TABLE 9-B (Contined) REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents July 3, 1930 August 30, 1935 June 20, 1938 July 24, 1946 July 3, 1958 H.R. May 9, 1974 S.R. May 31, 1974 March 3, 1899 June 13, 1902 March 3, 1905 June 20, 1938 May 17, 1950 March 3, 1899 March 2, 1919 June 14, 1880 June 25, 1910 July 3, 1930 March 2, 1945 March 2, 1945 July 24, 1946 March 2, 1945 November 7, 1966 PORT EVERGLADES HARBOR, FLA. (See Section 22 of Text) Maintenance of harbor constructed by local interests Enlarge entrance channel and complete turning basin to 1,200 feet square Widen turning basin 350 feet on north side Widen turning basin 200 feet on north side, 500 feet on south side and enlarge flare at entrance channel Deepen and widen entrance channel on a new alinement and increase turning basin in size and depth Deepen and widen entrance channel, enlarge turning basin, widen Pier 7 channel, maintenance of Berth 18 channel, and planning for a south jetty fishing walkway with construction contingent upon need as developed by detailed postauthorization studies REMOVAL OF AQUATIC GROWTH FROM NAVIGABLE WATERS IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA (See Section 23 of Text) Construction and operation of a suitable vessel and use of log booms for removal of water hyacinths in the navigable waters of the State Extermination and removal of water hyacinths by any mechanical, chemical, or other means Prohibits use of any chemical process injurious to cattle ST. AUGUSTINE HARBOR, FLA. (See Section 24 of Text) Channel 27 x 200 feet protected by a groin Channel 16 x 200 feet across bar, and thence 12 feet deep to Intracoastal Waterway; jetty on south side of inlet; future landward extension of groin and jetty; and channel 10 x 100 feet in San Sebastian River ST. JOHNS RIVER, FLA., JACKSONVILLE TO LAKE HARNEY (See Section 27 of Text) A channel 13 feet deep and 200 feet wide from Jacksonville to Palatka The improvement of Deep Creek Two jetties at VOlusia Bar (Maintenance only; new work completed under previous project.) A channel 100 feet wide, 8 feet deep from Palatka to Sanford with a side channel to Enterprise, and thence 5 feet deep to Lake Harney Cutoffs at Butcher Bend, Shake Creek, and Starks Landing, and easing bends at other points A channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide from Palatka to Sanford, with a side channel to Enterprise and with cutoffs and easing of bends Combining the two projects above into a single project for St. Johns River, Fla., Jacksonville to Lake Harney, and for a cutoff 5 feet deep and 75 feet wide between Lake Monroe and the vicinity of Osteen Bridge (Woodruff Creek Cutoff) A channel 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide from Palatka to Sanford, and in the branch to Enterprise ST. LUCIE INLET, FLA. (See Section 25 of Text) Channel 10 x 200 feet Modification to maintain existing channel 6 x 100 feet H.Doc. 357, 71st Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 25, 74th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 545, 75th Cong., 3d sess. H.Doc. 768, 78th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 346, 85th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 144, 93d. Cong., 1st sess. Annual Report 1899 Specified in Act Specified in Act H.Doc. 555, 75th Cong., 3d sess. H.Doc. 133, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 523, 55th Cong., 2d sess. and Annual Report for 1989, p. 1343 H.Doc. 699, 63rd Cong., 2d sess. Annual Report for 1879, pp. 795-798 H.Doc. 1111, 60th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 691, 69th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 603, 76th Cong., 3d sess. H.Doc. 445, 78th Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc. 208, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 391, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 508, 89th Cong., 2d sess. 9-40 TABLE 9-B (Contined) JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents H.R. May 9, 1974 S.R. May 31, 1974 Def. Act of March 4, 1929 July 3, 1930 August 26, 1937 May 17, 1950 August 8, 1917 September 22, 1922 July 3, 1930 August 30, 1935 August 26, 1937 October 17, 1940 March 2, 1945 July 3, 1958 August 4, 1976 March 3, 1899 March 3, 1905 Extending north jetty and modifying existing jetty to provide a sand bypass weir section; excavation of sand impoundment basin; construction of south jetty with walkway for recreational fishing; channel 10 x 500 feet thru bar cut, tapering to 150 feet thru the inlet, and 100 feet and 7 feet deep to the Intracoastal Waterway; and transfer of 380,000 cubic yards of material to the south beach during each two-year maintenance period ST. PETERSBURG HARBOR, FLA. (See Section 26 of Text) Dredging Point Pinellas Channel 16 x 200 feet Channel 19 x 250 feet westward from Tampa Bay into and including the basin at the port of St. Petersburg Channel 20 x 200 feet leading southward from previous authorization to Tampa Bay Entrance channel 24 x 300 feet from Tampa Bay to and including a 12-foot basin in Bayboro Harbor; Maritime Service channel 15 x 100 x 300 feet; channel 12 x 75 x 300 feet in mouth of Salt Creek SAN JUAN HARBOR, P.R. (See Section 27 of Text) Anchorage (inner harbor) area of 206 acres and San Antonio Channel to 30-foot depth Substitution of a 68-acre area 30 feet deep along southeasterly side of anchorage area, for one 25 acres in extent and of same depth extending easterly from eastern end of the San Antonio project channel Modified condition of local cooperation Entrance channel across outer bar 38 feet deep and 800 feet wide, and thence across bay to anchorage area (Anegado Reach Channel) 30 feet deep and 700 feet wide and increasing anchorage area to 239 acres to 30-foot depth Widening Anegado Reach Channel and increasing anchorage area to 329 acres Removal to 8-foot depth of Anegado, Largo, and Capitanejo Shoals, and dredging to 30-foot depth the entrance channel and turning basin to the Graving Dock Maintenance of the 30-foot depth entrance channel and turning basin to the Army Terminal Deepening portions of entrance and approach channels and basins to Army Terminal and San Antonio Pier areas to 35-45 feet; new 32-foot depth Puerto Nuevo Channel; new 36-foot depth anchorage A bar channel 48 by 800 feet, shifting the centerline 350 feet west; deepening Anegado Channel in steps from 46 to 40 feet while reducing width to 800 feet; deepening Army Terminal Channel and turning basin to 40 feet while widening the channel. to 450 feet; deepening Puerto Nuevo Channel to 40 feet and widening it to 400 feet; deepening Graving Dock Channel to 40 feet at existing 400-foot width; deepening San Antonio Channel to 38 feet at varying widths, minimum of 500 feet; deepening cruise ship basin to 36 feet at an irregular width; maintaining Sabana Approach Channel at 30 by 250 feet; provide a 38-foot depth in Anchorage Area "E" with irregular width; six mooring dolphins for vessels using the area. TAMPA HARBOR, FLA. (See Section 28 of Text) TAMPA BAY For a channel 27 feet deep from the Gulf of Mexico to Port Tampa, 500 feet wide across the bar and 300 feet wide in the bay For a channel depth of 26 feet with sufficient width from the Gulf of Mexico to Port Tampa H.Doc. 294, 93rd Cong., 1st sess. Specified in Act S.Doc. 229, 70th Cong., 2d sess. R.&H. Committee Doc. 71, 74th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 70, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 865, 63d Cong., 2d sess. Specified in Act H.Doc. 45, 71st Cong., 2d sess. R&H Comm. Doc. 38, 74th Cong., 1st sess. R&H Comm. Doc. 42, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 364, 76th Cong., 1st sess. Specified in Act H.Doc. 38, 85th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 574, 94th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 52, 55th Cong., 3d sess. (Also printed in Annual Report 1899, p. 1640) Channel dimensions specified in Act Specified in Act 9-41 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 9-B (Contined) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents June 25, 1910 August 8, 1917 March 3, 1899 September 22, 1922 July 3, 1930 August 30, 1935 June 20, 1938 Do. March 2, 1945 Do. Do. May 17, 1950 September 3, 1954 October 23, 1962 December 31, 1970 Do. Do. TAMPA AND HILLSBOROUGH BAYS For a depth of 24 feet in Hillsborough Bay For a 27-foot depth from Gulf of Mexico up to and in the several channels of Hillsborough Bay, the widths to be 500 feet on the bar, 300 feet in Tampa Bay, Ybor, and Garrison Channels, and 200 feet in Hillsborough Bay, Sparkman, and Seddon Channels, with turning basins at the mouth of Hillsborough and at Ybor Estuary HILLSBOROUGH RIVER For a 12-foot channel to within 100 feet of the Lafayette St. highway bridge (maintenance only; new work completed under a previous project under the title Improving Hillsborough Bay, Fla.) TAMPA HARBOR Consolidation of the above projects to form a single project for Tampa Harbor Increasing the depth of Egmont Channel to 29 feet and the width of Sparkman Channel to 300 feet For a depth of 32 feet and a width of 600 feet on Egmont Bar, a depth of 30 feet and a width of 400 feet in Mullet Key Cut, and a depth of 30 feet and a width of 300 feet in all other project channels in Tampa Harbor (except in Hillsborough River and in the channel leading to Alafia River); and for a turning basin 2,000 feet long and 500 feet in maximum width at the entrance to the Port Tampa terminals For widening the bend between Sparkman Channel and Cut D of Hillsborough Bay Channel by 250 feet; widening Ybor Channel to 400 feet and extending the turning basin at the west end of Garrison Channel (mouth of Hillsborough River) easterly for 300 feet For construction of a breakwater at Peter O. Knight Field, Davis Islands, its maintenance to be assumed by local interest For widening Sparkman Channel to 400 feet and Ybor Channel to 500 feet; widening the bend between Sparkman and Garrison Channels an additional 250 feet to extend the turning basin westerly; and widening the bend between Seddon and Garrison Channels by 150 feet (in lieu of 300 feet previously authorized) to extend the turning basin easterly For a channel 9 feet deep and 100 feet wide in the Hillsborough River for about 2.4 miles above the upper end of the existing 12-foot channel, and for the removal of obstructions thence to the Florida Avenue Bridge For a channel 25 feet deep and 150 feet wide from the Hillsborough Bay channel to and including a turning basin in the Alafia River (Revoked by Act of May 17, 1950) For deepening Egmont Channel to 36 feet; enlarging Mullet Key Cut, Tampa Bay Channel, Hillsborough Bay Channel, Port Tampa Channel and Port Tampa turning basin to present project dimensions; deepening Sparkman Channel and Ybor turning basin to 34 feet; a channel 30 feet deep and 200 feet wide from Hillsborough Bay Channel to and including a turning basin in Alafia River, 700 feet wide and 1,200 feet long (in lieu of the improvement previously authorized); and substantial widening at entrance, bends, and turns Extended removal of obstructions in Hillsborough River to City Water Works Dam. Maintenance of cleared channel to be assumed by local interests Channel and turning basin at Port Sutton 30 feet deep, Ybor Channel 34 x 400 feet For federal maintenance of Port Sutton Channel, 280 feet wide and an irregularly shaped turning basin both to a depth of 34 feet Enlarge entrance channel across Egmont Bar to 46 x 700 feet from the Gulf to Mullet Key Enlarge Mullet Key Cut Channel to 44 x 600 feet H.Doc. 634, 61st Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 634, 61st Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 545, 55th Cong., 2d sess. and Annual Report 1898, pp. 1357-1360 Specified in Act H.Doc. 100, 70th Cong., 1st sess. S.Doc. 22, 72d Cong., 1st sess. S.Doc. 164, 75th Cong., 3d sess. Sen. Comm. Print. 76th Cong., 1st sess. S.Doc. 183, 78th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 119, 77th Cong., 1st sess. S.Doc. 16, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 258, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 567, 81st Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 529, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 150, 91st Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 401, 91st Cong., 2d sess. Do. 9-42 TABLE 9-B (Contined) JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Enlarge Tampa Bay Channel to 44 x 500 feet from Mullet Key Cut through Tampa Bay to the junction of Hillsborough Bay and Port Tampa Channels Enlarge Hillsborough Bay Channel to 44 x 500 feet from the junction with Tampa Bay and Port Tampa Channels to the junction with Port Sutton entrance channel, and thence deepening to a depth of 42 feet at the existing width of 400 feet to the junction with Seddon and Sparkman Channels Enlarge Port Sutton entrance channel to 44 x 400 feet Enlarge Port Sutton turning basin to a depth of 44 feet and a turning diameter of 1,200 feet Deepening Sparkman Channel to 42 x 400 feet Deepening Ybor Channel to 40 x 300 feet Enlarge turning basin at the entrance to Ybor Channel to a depth of 42 feet and an additional width of 200 feet on the southwest edge of the present basin Deepening Port Tampa Channel to 42 feet at its existing width from the junction with Hillsborough and Tampa Bay Channels to the turning basin Deepening the Port Tampa turning basin to 42 feet over its existing length of 2,000 feet and width of 900 feet An entrance channel in East Bay 44 x 400 feet and 500 feet north from the Port Sutton turning basin for a distance of about 2,000 feet A turning basin in East Bay at a depth of 44 feet and with a turning diameter of 1,200 feet An approach channel in East Bay 44 x 300 feet north from the East Bay turning basin for a distance of about 2,500 feet Maintenance of Port Sutton Terminal channel to 44 x 200 feet for a distance of 4,000 feet BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS August 13, 1968 October 27, 1965 August 13, 1968 October 27, 1965 December 19, 1979 By Chief of ' Engineers under section 103 of the 1962 River and Harbor Act October 27, 1965 BREVARD COUNTY, FLA. (See Section 32 of Text) Federal participation in cost of shore protection project BROWARD COUNTY, FLA., BEACH EROSION CONTROL AND HILLSBORO INLET, FLA., NAVIGATION PROJECT (See Section 33 of Text) Improvement for beach erosion control in Broward County, Fla. and a combined beach erosion and navigation improvement to Hillsborough Inlet and the shore south thereof to Port Everglades DADE COUNTY, FLA. (See Section 34 of Text) Federal participation in cost of shore protection and hurricane-flood control project DUVAL COUNTY, FLA. (See Section 38 of Text) Federal participation in cost of shore protection project EL TUQUE BEACH, PONCE, P. R. Placement of about 60,000 cubic yards of fill material along eroded shoreline. Build a shore connected rubble breakwater and offshore breakwater to stabilize the fill material FORT PIERCE, FLA. (See Section 36 of Text) Federal participation in cost of local shore protection projects H.Doc. 352, 90th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 91, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 335, 90th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 273, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 84, 89th Cong., 1st sess. 9-43 Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. TABLE 9-B (Contined) REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents S.R. May 31, 1974 H.R. November 20, 1975 October 23, 1962 November 7, 1966 September 4, 1979 By Chief of Engineers under Section 103 of the 1962 River and Harbor Act FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS June 30, 1948 September 3, 1954 July 14, 1960 October 23, 1962 Do. Do. Do. Do. October 27, 1965 Do. August 13, 1968 Do. Approved December 17, 1970 under the provisions of Section 201 of the Flood Control Act of 1965 MANATEE COUNTY, FLA. (See Section 37 of Text) Federal participation in cost of shore protection project PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLA., FROM MARTIN COUNTY LINE TO LAKE WORTH INLET AND FROM SOUTH LAKE WORTH INLET TO BROWARD COUNTY LINE (See Section 38 of Text) Federal participation in cost of local shore protection project and sand-transfer plant PINELLAS COUNTY, FLA. (See Section 39 of Text) Federal participation in cost of shore protection project PUNTA SALINAS RECREATION AREA, P.R. Shore restoration of the east and west shores of the Punta Salinas Recreation Area CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA (See Section 42 of Text) First phase of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes Modification and expansion of authorization to include entire comprehensive plan of improvement Canals, levees, and water-control and drainage structures in the Nicodemus Slough area, Glades County Flood protection on Boggy Creek, near Orlando Flood protection in the Cutler Drain area, near Miami Flood control and drainage works for South Dade County Project for Shingle Creek between Clear Lake and Lake Tohopekaliga for flood control and major drainage, including development of Reedy Creek Swamp Improvement of easterly section of West Palm Beach Canal for flood control and major drainage Primary works for flood control and major drainage in southwest Dade County Primary works for flood control and major drainage in Hendry County Gravity drainage in Martin County and distribution of available water supplies to portions of Martin and St. Lucie Counties Improvement of supply, distribution, and conservation of water resources in Central and Southern Florida, including Lake Okeechobee agricultural area, Everglades National Park and other related areas. Navigation improvements suitable for recreational craft S.Doc. 93, 37th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 164, 87th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 519, 89th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 643, 80th Cong., 2d sess. (Contains latest published map) H.Doc. 643, 80th Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc. 53, 86th Cong. 1st sess. S.Doc. 125, 87th Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc. 123, 87th Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc. 138, 87th Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc. 139, 87th Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc. 146, 87th Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc. 20, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 102, 88th Cong., 1st sess. S.Doc. 101, 90th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 369, 90th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 394, 91st Cong., 2d sess. 9-44 TABLE 9-B (Contin Acts October 23, 1962 December 31, 1970 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT ed) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized FOUR RIVER BASINS, FLA. (See Section 43 of Text) Control of floods and improvement of drainage, and for water conservation through construction of necessary canals, levees, reservoirs, and control structures PORTUGUES AND BUCANA RIVERS, P.R. (See Section 44 of Text) LAGO de CERRILLOS, P.R. Multiple purpose dam and lake for flood control, water supply, and recreation LAGO de PORTUGUES, P.R. Multiple purpose dam and lake for flood control, water supply and recreation PONCE, P.R. Diversion and enlargement of existing channels through Ponce for flood control Documents H.Doc. 585, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 422, 91st Cong., 2d sess. 9-45 TABLE 9-C REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 CANAVERAL HARBOR, FLA. PROJECT DATA RELATIVE TO LOCK (See Section 3 of Text) Distance to nearest town 9.9 miles via 12-foot barge canal and Intracoastal Waterway Name of nearest town Cocoa, Fla. Distance from Intracoastal Waterway 6.5 miles Lock Dimensions 90' wide; 600' long' Lift Varies with tide Depth of sills (mlw, ocean) 14 feet Character of foundation Piles in sand Year completed and opened to navigation 1965 Contract cost $2,966,539 56 x 400 feet authorized. At request of NASA lock was increased width. Operation and maintenance of lock is a Federal constructed 90 feet wide with NASA bearing additional cost responsibility. ($700,000). Length increased to 600 feet to be compatible with TABLE 9-D CROSS-FLORIDA BARGE CANAL PROJECT LOCKS AND DAMS (See Section 7 of Text) Henry H. Buckman Lock R. N. Eureka Lock Bert Dosh and Dam Lock Nearest town (miles) Miles from Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Lock dimensions (ft.)' Normal lift (ft.) Depth over sills at normal pool levels: Upper (ft.) Lower (ft.) Character of foundation Kind of dam Type const. Percent complete Estimated contract cost 'Clear width and greatest available length. 2Pool level varies with natural ground water profile from minimum elevation of 40 feet to maximum elevation of 55 feet. 3With concrete spillway and movable gates. 9-46 Dunnellon Lock Inglis Lock and Dam Palatka, 11.2 90.4 84 x 600 20 14 15 Piles in sand Movable Earth3 100 $6,094,000 Sparr, 15.8 111.4 84 x 600 20 17 14 Piles in sand Movable Earth3 100 $7,975,000 Ocala, 8.9 127.7 84 x 600 0-152 16-312 16 Piles in sand None 0 $7,430,000 Dunnellon, 2.5 156.5 84 x 600 12-272 16-312 18 Rock None 0 $9,500,000 Inglis, 3.2 168.6 84 x 600 28 18 15 Rock Movable Earth3 100 $7,800,000 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT TABLE 9-E CROSS-FLORIDA BARGE CANAL OPERATIONS AND RESULTS DURING FISCAL YEAR (See Section 7 of Text) Work Performed Cost Maintenance: Operation and maintenance of communications network $15,713 Removal of debris, mosquitoes, and aquatic plant life from reservoirs 57,698 Analysis of hydrologic and meteorologic data for scheduling releases from Lake Ocklawaha and Inglis Bypass 4,457 Reimbursement to USGS for water quality surveillance 16,340 Water quality surveillance 74,497 Maintenance of tools, and permanent equipment 43,466 Maintenance of canal and dam slopes and berms 109,876 Collection for quarters - 3,346 Clearing and Snagging, Lake Ocklawaha 4,628 Real Estate Management 210 Condition and operation studies 93,503 Gate Hoist Frame Repairs, Rodman and Inglis Dams 73,978 Engineering and design 3,938 Supervision and administration 239,360 Maintenance of roads 14,091 Trash removal 43 Total 748,452 Operation and care: Inglis Eureka and Buckman Locks, Rodman Dam Inglis Dam and Spillway. Inglis Bypass and Spillway, and buildings and grounds, and recreational facilities maintained by hired labor 534,807 Buildings and grounds maintained by contract 15,684 Sanitary facilities at recreation areas 14,906 Total 565,397 9-47 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 9-F OKEECHOBEE WATERWAY OPERATIONS AND RESULTS DURING FISCAL YEAR (See Section 19 of Text) Work Performed Cost New Work: Contract for recreation facilities @ W.P. Franklin and Moore Haven Locks awarded November 17, 1980 $340,879 Engineering and design 12,304 Supervision and administration 45,738 Total applied cost 398,921 Maintenance: District communications network 33,285 Repair and replacement of project signs 29,764 Snagging and clearing navigation channels 72,305 Operation and maintenance of recreation facilities 331,826 Collection for Quarters - 9,973 Service and maintain traffic counters 7,818 Maintenance of downstream safety barriers and repair electrical system 7,218 Real Estate 35,953 Reevaluate and update master plan 8,271 Condition and operation studies 61,824 Contract Operation of Locks 14,620 Dredging Crossroads 7,786 Engineering and design 114,153 Supervision and administration 169,826 Hired labor surveys, inspections, and reports 36,554 Total applied cost 921,230 Operation and care: Hired labor cost of operating Moore Haven, Ortona and St. Lucie Locks and maintenance of structures and grounds 391,510 9-48 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT TABLE 9-G REMOVAL OF AQUATIC GROWTH FROM NAVIGABLE WATERS IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA CONTROL OPERATIONS (See Section 25 of Text) Locality Acres Controlled Cost St. John's River and tributaries and Withlacoohee, Kissimmee and Crystal Rivers 18,579 $1,711,508 Okeechobee Waterway and tributaries 3,448 284,466 White Amur study 325,000 Acquisition and maintenance of airboats, engines, and work tools 19,373 Misc. Hired Labor Surveys and Equipment 49,704 Operation of communications network 11,606 Engineering design 110,079 Supervision and Administration 57,713 Total 22,027 2,569,449 TABLE 9-H NAVIGATION PROJECTS ON WHICH RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS ONLY WERE CONDUCTED DURING FISCAL YEAR (See Section 32 of Text) Date Cost Incurred Survey During Project Conducted Period' Anclote River. Fla. April 1981 $ 1,763 Bakers Haulover Inlet, Fla. February 1981 7,889 Cedar Keys Harbor, Fla. March 1981 1,953 Clearwater Pass, Fla. November 1980 18,147 Courtenay Channel, Fla. July 1981 4,292 Crystal River, Fla. July 1981 3,016 Eau Gallie Harbor, Fla. June 1981 8,788 Homosassa River, Fla. April 1981 4,348 Horseshoe Cove, Fla. August 1981 213 IWW, Miami to Key West, Fla. August 1981 1,441 Key West Harbor, Fla. September 1981 19,813 Kissimmee River, Fla., April 1981 13,281 Melbourne Harbor, Fla. July 1981 2,321 New River, Fla. August 1981 2,029 Pass-A-Grille Pass, Fla. July 1981 12,202 Steinhatchee River, Fla. July 1981 67 Suwannee River, Fla. May 1981 2,279 Withlacoochee River, Fla. March 1981 1,722 Architect- Engineer Contracts 128,908 Supervision and Administration 339 'Costs of surveys included with maintenance costs under Section "Other authorized Navigation Projects." 9-49 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Section 33 of Text) For Last Cost to Sept. 30, 1981 Full Report See annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Anclote River, Fla. 1974 267,427 590,164 Aquatic Plant Control, Fla. (R&H Acts of 1958 & 1962) 1968 2,619,7002 Atlantic Gulf Ship Canal, Fla. 1939 5,099,153 Bakers Haulover Inlet. Fla.' 1965 243,2353 31,182 Bayport, Fla4 1972 58,4955 Cedar Keys Harbor, Fla 1977 168,5696 47,311 Christiansted Harbor. St. Croix. V.I.,' 1964 303,317 37,741 Clearwater Pass, Fla.21 1980 46,349 1,166,657 Courtenay Channel, Fla.' 1940 22,846 18,254 Crystal River, Fla.' 1941 25,000 89,447 Eau Gallie Harbor, Fla.' 1970 9,627 63,670 Everglades Harbor, Fla.' 1964 221,5098 47,043 Fajardo Harbor, P.R.4 1945 - Guayanes Harbor, P.R.4 1945 - Gulf Intracoastal Waterway St. Marks to Tampa Bay, Fla. 1974 38,850 Homosassa River, Fla.' 1937 3,9998 9,779 Horseshoe Cove, Fla. 1977 347,521 122,732 Hudson River, Fla.3 1974 9,889 Intracoastal Waterway, Miami to Key West, Fla.3 1963 243,079 14,746 Key West Harbor, Fla.' 1972 1,548,89212 469,358 Kissimmee River, Fla.' 1931 23,479 39,072 Lake Crescent and Dunns Creek, Fla.9' " 1931 10,276 8,166 Largo Sound Channel, Fla. 3, 18 1966 117,443'13 39,754 Little Manatee River, Fla. 4 " 1949 11,90314 Manatee River, Fla." 1970 123,350 1'6,809 Melbourne Harbor, Fla.' 1970 17,696 60,675 New River Fla.' 1956 36,518 20,679 Orange River, Fla.' 1962 2,000 22,737 Ozona, Fla., channel and turning basin' 1963 105,527 14,560 Palm Beach, Fla., side channel and basin4 1946 - Pass-A-Grille Pass, Fla. ' ' 5 1966 41,29716 45,376 Pithlachascotee River, Fla. 1973 400,000' 7 253,088 Rice Creek, Fla.' 1957 85,20818 15,152 St. Thomas Harbor. V.I.4 1949 1,989 Steinhatchee River, Fla.' 1940 135,053 38,785 Suwannee River, Fla." 1977 76,418'9 195,751 Withlacoochee River, Fla." 1969 614,91220 365,644 1. Complete. 2. Excludes $918,205 contributed funds. 3. Excludes $243,235 for contributed funds. 4. Inactive. 5. Includes $41,222 for reconnaissance and detailed project reports under Section 107 of the R&H Act of 1960. 6. Includes $82,500 expended under previous project. Excludes $1,473 contributed funds. 7. Project as modified by Chief of Engineers in report of June 30, 1961, is complete. Previously authorized depth of 25 feet in inactive status. 8. Excludes $36,000 contributed funds. 9. In addition, $1,000 expended from contributed funds. 10. Includes $27,500 for new work under previous project. Excludes $35,371 contributed funds. 11. Deauthorized by Public Law 93-251, Section 12. 12. Authorized April 20, 1964 by Chief of Engineers under Section 107 of 1960 R&H Act. 13. Includes $25,008 for detailed project report but excludes $86,716 expended from contributed funds. 14. Expended on restudy. 15. Authorized November 19, 1964 by Chef of Engineers under Sections 107 of R&H Act of 1960. 16. Excludes $41,296 contributed funds. 17. Excludes $215,728 contributed funds. 18. Excludes $93,000 contributed funds. 19. Includes $10,154 expended under previous project. 20. Includes $30,000 expended under previous project. 21. Balance of $61 from prior year and transfer has been made during FY 1981. 9-50 TABLE 9-I JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT TABLE 9-J OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION PROJECTS (See Section 45 of Text) For Last Cost to Sept. 30, 1980 Full Report See annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Cape Florida State Park 1969 34,862' Key West, Fla. 1963 96,3402 3,794 Lee County, Fla. 1971 - Lido Key, Fla. 1971 Mullet Key, Fla. 1973 436,2013 1,656 Palm Beach County, Fla., from Lake Worth Inlet to South Lake Worth Inlet 1970 195,1404 6,257 San Juan, Puerto Rico 1965 Virginia Key and Key Biscayne, Fla. 1978 1,667,2205 1,022 1. Includes $2,462 cost of reconnaissance and detailed project 4. Excludes $781,188 in property or services furnished by reports but excludes $13,818 contributed funds. local interests in lieu of cash contribution. 2. Excludes $192,168 contributed funds. 5. Excludes $714,522 contributed funds. 3. Excludes $187,133 contributed funds. TABLE 9-K CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA PROJECT PRINCIPAL FEATURES OF HURRICANE GATES (See Section 47 of Text) Depth Character Over of Year Gate' Nearest Town Distance Sills Founda- Com- Actual No. Name (miles) (ft.) tion pleted Cost 2. Clewiston, Fla. 0.5 10 Pile 1935 $309,748 3. Lake Harbor, Fla. 0.5 10 Rock 1935 316,938 4. Belle Glade, Fla. 4.0 10 Rock 1935 350,025 5. Canal Point, Fla. 0.0 10 Rock 1935 262,465 6. Okeechobee, Fla. 0.5 7 Pile 1936 373,273 'All are 50 feet wide with available length unlimited. They are Gate No. 6 has an auxiliary culvert spillway with automatic conconstructed of concrete with steel sector gates and have no lift. trol. Moore Haven Lock serves as Hurricane Gate Structure 1. 9-51 TABLE 9-L Nearest Town CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA PROJECT PRINCIPAL FEATURES OF LOCKS AND DAMS (See Section 47 of Text) Miles Elevation From Lock Normal of Normal Character Kind Kind Nearest Dimensions lift Pool Depth of of of of Town (ft.) (ft.) surface (ft.) sills (ft.) foundation Dam Construction W.P. Franklin Lock and Dam' S-65 Lock S-65A Lock S-65B Lock S-65C Lock S-65D Lock S-65E Lock co Moore Haven ca Lock (HGS-1 Mod.) S-310 HGS-2 Mod.) S-193 HGS-6 Mod. S-308B S-57 S-58 S-59 S-60 S-61 S-62 S-63 S-63A S-96 S-96A S-53 S-55 S-157 S-158 At Olga Frostproof Avon Park Sebring Sebring Okeechobee Okeechobee Hoore Haven Clewiston Okeechobee Pahokee Ashton Ashton Kissimmee Ashton St. Cloud Ashton Ashton' Ashton Sebastian Sebastian Eau Gallie Christmas Sebastian Titusville 0 56 x 400 2.5 23 30 x 90 4.2 26 30 x 90 6.3 20 30 x 90 6.0 25 30 x 90 7.2 14 30 x 90 5.8 10 30 x 90 4.6 0.5 50 x 250 9.4 0.5 50 x 60 5.0 0.5 50 x 60 7.5 11 56 x 400 4.0 9 20 x 90 1.0 5 20 x 90 2.0 6 20 x 90 3.0 6 20 x 90 2.0 6 30 x 90 2.0 10 20 x 90 3.0 12 20 x 90 5.0 14 20 x 90 4.5 14 20 x 60 4.0 16 20 x 60 7.5 8 20 x 60 3.5 12 20 x 60 10.0 4 20 x 60 20.0 15 20 x 60 48. 15. 15. 15. 15. 4.5 3.0 14 Piles in clay 5-52.33 6 Earth foundation, sand 46.3 6 Earth foundation, sand 40.0 6 Earth foundation, sand 34.0 6 Earth foundation, sand 26.8 6 Earth foundation, sand 21.0 6 Earth foundation, sand .5-17.53 11 Piles in sand .5-17.53 12.9 Slab on sand . 5-17.53 7.5 Piles in sand and slab on sand 5-17.53 18 Slab on sand 62.0 6 Earth foundation, sand 64.0 6 Do. 58.0 6 Do. 64.0 6 Do. 55.0 6 Do. 61.0 6 Do. 62.0 6 Do. 57.0 6 Do. 24.0 6 Do. 25.0 6 Do. 17.5 6 Do. 14.0 6 Do. 20.0 6 Do. 4.0 6 Do. Movable Reinforced concrete None Reinforced concrete rigid frame None Reinforced concrete rigid frame None Reinforced concrete rigid frame None Reinforced concrete rigid frame None Reinforced concrete rigid frame None Reinforced concrete None Steel sheet pile lockwalls None Reinforced concrete None Reinforced concrete Fixed Reinforced concrete None Concrete and steel sheet pile None Do. None Do. None Do. None Do. None Do. None Do. None Do. None Do. None Do. None Do. None Do. None Do. None Do. 'Operation and care of W.P. Franklin Lock and Dam (5-79) is a Federal responsibility. 3The normal pool level varies seasonally between the two elevations. 'Operation and care of W.P. Franklin Lock and Dam (S-79) is a Federal responsibility. 2Estimated. Percent Contract Complete Cost 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 0 100 0 100 0 000 100 0000000 00 $3,803,655 $1,191,574.70 $1,513,693.91 $1,050,600.69 $1,326,073.12 $1,213,248.51 $1,320,039.84 $301,0002 $3,448,406 $427,3002 $8,308,700 $1,632,0002 $1,632,0002 $1,632,0002 $1,632,0002 $689,217 $1,632,0002 $1,632,0002 $1,598,0002 $1,431,0002 $1,362,0002 $1,322,0002 $1,355,0002 $1,723,0002 $1,558,0002 O 0 O ti 0 'Ti Co O Co z O z Tj 00 3The normal pool level varies seasonally between the two elevations. -- --- JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT TABLE 9-M CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA PROJECT LOCAL COOPERATION (See Section 47 of Text) Flood Control Act Work Authorized o/o Cash Contributions' June 30, 1948 First phase of comprehensive plan 15.0 Sept. 3, 1954 Second phase of comprehensive plan 20.0 July 14, 1960 Nicodemus Slough area 31.5 Oct. 23, 1962 West Palm Beach Canal 12.8 Boggy Creek Basin 29.7 Shingle Creek Basin 25.9 South Dade County area 19.2 Reedy Creek Swamp 50.0 Oct. 27, 1965 Southwest Dade County 46.0 Hendry County area 19.5 Aug. 13, 1968 Martin County Flood Control Features 34.0 Irrigation Features 49.0 Recreation Features 42.0 Water Resources 20.0 Approved Dec. 17, 1970 Navigation improvements suitable for 50.0 under Provisions of recreational craft Section 201 of 1965 Flood Control Act 'Computed on total contract cost and supervision and administration except for Reedy Creek Swamp which is computed on all costs, including engineering and design and land. 9-53 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 9-N CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA PROJECT OPERATIONS AND RESULTS DURING FISCAL YEAR (See Section 47 of Text) Work Performed Cost New Work: Construction of: Locks $ 5,295 Channels and canals 657,261 Levees 2,241,644 Pumping plants 1,409,979 Floodway control and diversion structures 178,178 Building, Grounds and Utilities 253,124 Engineering and design 1,588,198 Supervision and administration 380,536 Total applied cost 6,714,215 Maintenance: Operation of district communications network 50,093 Repair or replacement of project signs 51,812 Patrol, inspections, and maintenance of Herbert Hoover Dike 540,383 Repair and stabilize crown road, Herbert Hoover Dike 35,636 Remove weed growth and replant grass on levee slopes, Herbert Hoover Dike 34,022 Rebuild and regrade levee slopes, Herbert Hoover Dike 97,419 Clean out landslide toe ditches and berms on Herbert Hoover Dike 27,848 Repair or replace culverts, Herbert Hoover Dike 24,745 Repair fences, Herbert Hoover Dike, LD-3 36,717 Recreation area, W.P. Franklin Lock 73,636 Berms, fences and shrubs on C-43 24,054 Clear debris from landslide entrance channel to all culverts, approach channels at HGS and floodway channels 38,927 Repair and riprap eroded berms, Herbert Hoover Dike 542,410 Remove trees and riprap slopes, Herbert Hoover Dike 36,275 Operations W.P. Franklin Lock and Spillway (S-79) 188,326 Operations and maintenance of spillways: St. Lucie (S-80); Moore Haven (S-77); 28,865 Ortona (S-78); S-10, 11, & 12 31,385 Operation of four hurricane gate structures 20,165 Operation and maintenance of 20 drainage culverts, thru levees and 16 spillways along St. Lucie Canal 3,423 Mowing grass on levee slopes Herbert Hoover Dike 76 Collection for quarters and damages - 3,894 Operation of Port Mayaca Lock and Spillway 152,490 Reimbursement to U.S.G.S. for cooperative stream gaging 42,700 Analysis of data for scheduling releases 177,945 Water quality studies 182,387 Real Estate Management 1,656 Dam Safety Studies 178,244 Service and maintain traffic counters 1,450 Reconnaissance Reports, Major Rehab. 352 Survey Water Data Gauges 1,494 Periodic Surveys 76,166 Emergency Repair, HGS-4 Repair St. Lucie Tieback Levee Rehabilitation of existing equipment for the hydrometer network Dewater, repair, sandblast and paint S-12, HGS-3 154,784 Reevaluate and update master plan 44,729 Performance monitoring 1,894 Maintenance of Airboat 547 Study by Waterway Experiment Station 58,497 Review of South Florida Water Management District permit applications 1,431 Regulatory of Lake Okeechobee and 3 construction areas Collection of data by CAO 126,134 Maintenance of hydrometeorological network 50,194 Engineering and design 34,083 Supervision and administration 183,289 Total applied cost 3,353,047 9-54 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT TABLE 9-0 CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA PROJECT CONSTRUCTION COMPLETED UNDER EXISTING PROJECT DURING FISCAL YEAR (See Section 47 of Text) Date transferred to Flood Control District Construction for Operation and Feature Period Maintenance Channels and Canal: C-304 January 1980 -May 1981 Structures S-151 January 1980 -May 1981 S-339 February 1979 - December 1980 S-340 February 1979 - December 1980 TABLE 9-P CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA PROJECT STATUS OF WORK UNDER CONTRACT AT END OF FISCAL YEAR (See Section 47 of Text) Construction Approx. 0/o Feature Started Complete Channels and Canals: C-103 March 1979 95 Levees: L-18 & 19 April 1980 59 L-24 & 25 January 1980 99 L-65 January 1980 13 Pumping Plants: S-331 March 1979 60 Structures: S-135 January 1980 66 S-153 January 1980 66 Operator's Quarters (Port Mavaca) July 1981 10 9-55 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 FOUR RIVER BASINS, FLORIDA PROJECT MOSS BLUFF LOCK (See Section 48 of Text) Nearest town Name of nearest town Distance above mouth of River Lock dimensions Normal lift Elevation of normal pool surface Depth of sills Character of foundation Kind of dam Type of construction Percent complete Estimated Cost (including dam and spillway) 20 miles Ocala, Fla. 65.5 miles 30 x 125 feet 18.0 feet 58 feet 12 feet Piles in sand None Reinforced concrete 100 $1,990,138 TABLE 9-R FOUR RIVER BASINS, FLORIDA PROJECT CONDITION AT END OF FISCAL YEAR (See Section 48 of Text) Date transferred to Construction Southwest Florida Feature Period for Operation and Maintenance Bridges: B-194 July 1968 - Mar. 1970 Not transferred Alteration of Facilities B-195 May 1971 - Jan. 1973 Do. B-594 Jan. 1973 - Jan. 1974 Do. Alteration of Facilities B-196 Oct. 1972 - Jan. 1975 Do. SCL RR Br., B-196 Dec. 1972 - July 1975 July 1975 Channels and Canals: C-135 May 1967 - Dec. 1968 Dec. 1968 C-135, Sec. 1A July 1966 - Aug. 1967 Oct. 1967 C-135, Sec. 1B May 1968 - Sep. 1972 Not transferred C-135, Sec. 1C & 2 Jan. 1971 - Dec. 1973 Not transferred C-135, Sec. 3A Dec. 1972 - Apr. 1975 Oct. 1977 C-135, Sec. 3B Feb. 1975 - Aug. 1977 Not transferred C-135, Sec. 4A Apr. 1976 - Jan. 1979 Not transferred C-136 Aug. 1975 - May 1977 Nov. 1977 C-231, Phase I July 1973 - Apr. 1975 Dec. 1975 C-231, Phase II July 1973 - Jan. 1974 Dec. 1975 C-331 July 1967 - Sep. 1968 Sep. 1968 C-531 Apr. 1966 - Jan. 1969 Apr. 1969 C-534 June 1970 - July 1971 Nov. 1971 C-135 March 1977 - Oct. 1980 Structures: S-160 May 1967 - Dec. 1968 Dec. 1968 S-161 Aug. 1975 - May 1977 Nov. 1977 S-162 Apr. 1975 - June 1977 Apr. 1977 S-353 July 1967 - Sep. 1968 Nov. 1968 Moss Bluff Lock and Spillway Apr. 1967 - Mar. 1969 Dec. 1975 S-551 July 1970 - Feb. 1972 Not transferred Levees: L-212, Sec. 1 June 1968 - July 1970 Dec. 1975 L-212, Sec. 2 July 1970 - Sep. 1971 Dec. 1975 L-112 March 1977 - Oct. 1980 L-112 & Floodway May 1978 - July 1981 S-155 May 1978 - July 1981 S-163 May 1978 - July 1981 S-159 Middle& Lower April 1979 - Aug. 1981 S-159 Upper June 1979 - Sep. 1981 9-56 TABLE 9-Q JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT TABLE 9-S OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 51 of Text) For Last Cost to Sept. 30, 1981 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Arch Creek, Dade County, Fla. 1960 $66,485' Biscayne Bay, Fla., Hurricane Protection 1966 - Hillsborough Bay, Fla.2 1969 Phillippi Creek Basin, Fla.2 1966 1. Excludes $11,734 cost of preauthorization studies. Project 2. Inactive. was authorized February 20, 1959, by Chief of Engineers under 3. Includes $44,282 for reconnaissance and detailed project Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act as Modified by P.L. 685, reports. 84th Congress. TABLE 9-T FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 205, PUBLIC LAW 685, (PREAUTHORIZATION) (See Section 52 of Text) Study Identification Period Costs Detailed Project Report: Estate Mon Bijou, V.I. $35,881 Seminole Basin, Fla. 51,903 Rio Tallaboa, P.R. 88,522 Sabana Grande, P.R. 34,983 Savan Gut-St. Thomas, V.I. 93,227 9-57 MOBILE, ALA., DISTRICT* This district comprises a small portion of southeastern Tennessee, western Georgia, western Florida, all of Alabama south of Tennessee River Basin, eastern Mississippi, and a small portion of southeastern Louisiana embraced in drainage basins tributary to the Gulf of Mexico, west of Aucilla River basin, to and inchlding the Pascagoula River Basin. The Pearl River Basin, Mississippi was included as part of the Mobile District until 1 October 1981, when responsibilities were transferred to Vicksburg District, Lower Mississippi Valley Division. A section of the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway from St. Marks, Florida, to Lake Borgne Light No. 29, Louisiana is also within Mobile District. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Apalachicola Bay, Fla............. 10-2 2. Aquatic Plant Control (R&H Act of 1965) ........................ 10-3 3. Bayou Coden, Ala. .............. 10-3 4. Bayou La Batre, Ala ............ 10-3 5. Biloxi Harbor, Miss ............. 10-4 6. Black Warrior and Tombigbee Rivers, Ala. .................... 10-4 7. Blackwater River, Fla. .......... 10-6 8. Bon Secour, Ala................... 10-6 9. Cadet Bayou, Miss ................ 10-6 10. Dauphin Island Bay, Ala ......... 10-7 11. Dog and Fowl Rivers, Ala. ....... 10-8 12. East Pass Channel from Gulf of Mexico into Choctawhatchee Bay, Fla. ......................... 10-8 13. East Pearl River, Miss. and La. ......................... 10-8 14. Escambia-Conecuh Rivers, Fla. and Ala. ..... ........ 10-8 15. Fly Creek, Ala .................. 10-9 16. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway between Apalachee Bay, Fla. and Mexican Border (Mobile District) ......................... 10-9 17. Gulfport Harbor, Miss ............ 10-10 18. Mobile Harbor, Ala ............. 10-11 19. Panama City Harbor, Fla. ........ 10-11 20. Pascagoula Harbor, Miss ......... 10-12 21. Pearl River, Miss. and La. ........ 10-13 22. Pensacola Harbor, Fla........... 10-13 23. Perdido Pass Channel, Ala. ....... 10-14 24. Port St. Joe Harbor, Fla........... 10-14 25. Removing Water Hyacinths, Mobile District .................. 10-15 26. Waterway Connecting Tombigbee and Tennessee Rivers, Ala., and Miss .......................... 10-16 27. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys ........................ 10-16 28. Other Authorized Navigation Projects .......................... 10-16 29. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ..................... 10-16 Beach Erosion Control 30. Authorized Beach Erosion Control Project .......................... 10-16 Deauthorized Projects 31. Deauthorized Projects ........... 10-16 Flood Control 32. Okatibbee Lake, Miss. ............ 10-16 33. Tallahala Creek Lake, Pascagoula River, Miss. .................... 10-17 34. Edinburg Lake, Pearl River, Miss. ........................... 10-17 35. Gordons Creek, Hattiesburg, Miss. .............. 10-17 *All cost and finance statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 10-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 36. Houlka Creek, Chickasaw and Clay Counties, Miss........... 10-18 37. Tombigbee River, Miss. and Ala. .............................. 10-18 38. Tombigbee River Tributaries, Miss. and Ala..................... 10-18 39. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ................ 10-18 40. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects .......................... 10-19 41. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ................... 10-19 Multiple Purpose Projects Including Power Page 42. Alabama-Coosa Rivers, Ala., and Ga ............................... 10-19 42A. Carters Lake, Ga................ 10-20 42B. Claiborne Lock and Dam, Ala .............................. 10-20 42C. Jones Bluff lock and Dam, Ala. .............................. 10-21 42D. Millers Ferry Lock and Dam, Ala. .............................. 10-21 Navigation 1. APALACHICOLA BAY, FLA. Location. The project is on the coast of northwest Florida 160 miles east of Pensacola Harbor. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11401.) Previous project. For details, see page 1833, Annual Report for 1915, and page 689, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The authorized project provides for: (a) A channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide from the 10-foot depth in Apalachicola Bay, across St. George Island, to within 300 feet of the gulf shore, thence increasing uniformly in width to 200 feet at the shore and continuing with that width to the 10-foot depth in the Gulf of Mexico, with twin jetties extending from the dune line to the outer end of the channel; (b) an inner bar channel, 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide, in Apalachicola Bay; (c) a boat basin 200 feet by -880 feet and nine feet deep at Apalachicola, Florida, with a connecting channel nine feet deep and 80 feet wide through Scipio Creek to Apalachicola River; (d) a channel known as Link Channel, 10 feet deep and 150 feet wide, in Apalachicola Bay; (e) a channel generally parallel to the shore at 42E. Coosa River Navigation ........... 10-21 43. Allatoona Lake, Coosa River Basin, Ga. ...................... 10-22 44. Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, and Flint Rivers, Ala., Ga., and Fla ............... 10-22 44A.Buford Dam, Ga. ............... 10-23 44B. George W. Andrews Lock and Dam, Ala. and Ga ................ 10-24 44C. Jim Woodruff Lock and Dam, Ga. and Fla. ........................ 10-24 44D. Spewrell Bluff Lake, Ga. ......... 10-25 44E. Walter F. George Lock and Dam, Ala. and Ga. ...................... 10-25 44F. West Point Lake, Chattahoochee River Basin, Ga. and Ala ......... 10-26 45. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations ............ 10-26 46. 47. General Investigations Surveys .......................... 10-27 Collection and Study of Basic Data ............................ 10-27 Eastpoint, Florida, six feet deep, 100 feet wide, and about 6,000 feet long, with a connecting channel six feet deep and 100 feet wide to water at the same depth in St. George Sound; (f) a channel ten feet deep and 100 feet wide through Bulkhead Shoals, connecting Apalachicola Bay with St. George Sound; and (g) a 6-foot by 100-foot channel about one mile long, generally parallel to the shore at Two Mile, Florida, with a 6-foot by 100- foot connecting channel to water of the same depth in Apalachicola Bay. (See Table 10-B for authorized modifications of Two Mile project.) Mean range of tide throughout this harbor is 1.6 feet. Extreme range, except during storms, is about three feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Requirements have been fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Facilities consist of pileand- timber wharves which are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Hired labor costs included $5,798 for condition studies; and $1,638 for supervision and administration. 10-2 MOBILE, ALA., DISTRICT Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project, authorized by the 1954 River and Harbor Act, was completed in 1959, including reimbursement to local interests for approved work, as authorized by the 1958 River and Harbor Act. Improvements at Two Mile except for modifications authorized in 1975 were completed in September 1964. Construction ,of the breakwater and channel improvements authorized in 1975 at Two Mile were completed in September 1977. Total Federal costs under existing project as of September 30, 1981 were $1,898,848 for new work and $2,090,704 for maintenance, a total of $3,989,552. 2. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (RIVER AND HARBOR ACT OF 1965) Location. Navigable water, tributary streams, connecting channels and other allied waters in Mobile District. Existing project. The authorized project provides for control and progressive eradication of water hyacinth, alligatorweed, Eurasian watermilfoil and other obnoxious aquatic plant growths from navigable water, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters of the United States, in the combined interest of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, public health, and related purposes, including continued research for development of the most effective and economical control measures to be administered by the Chief of Engineers, under the direction of the Secretary of the Army, in cooperation with other Federal and State agencies. Research and planning cost prior to construction shall be borne fully by the United States. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests shall agree to hold and save the United States free from claims that may occur from control operations and to participate to the extent of 30 percent of such operations. Requirements are being met in Alabama, Georgia, Florida and Louisiana. Operations and results duringfiscal year. Planning, engineering, design, supervision with the States of Alabama, Georgia, Florida, Louisiana and Mississippi cost $14,217. Condition at end of fiscal year. Total Federal costs under the existing project as of September 30, 1981 were $386,504. Contributed funds for maintenance amount to $21,225. 3. BAYOU CODEN, ALA. Location. The project is located in a small tidal stream on the southern coast of Mobile County, Alabama, emptying into Mississippi Sound about 7.6 miles northwest of Cedar Point, the southern tip of western mainland shore of Mobile Bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11376.) Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1945, page 843. Existing project. The project provides for a channel eight feet deep by 60 feet wide extending from La Belle Avenue bridge south for about 3,000 feet through the bayou to Portersville Bay, thence eight feet deep by 100 feet wide extending about 2.3 miles westward across Portersville Bay to connect with the Bayou La Batre channel, and a turning basin eight feet deep by 60 feet wide by 100 feet long on the west side of the bayou channel about 500 feet south of the La Belle Avenue bridge. Mean tidal range is 1.75 feet, and extreme, except during storms, is 3.5 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Small privately-owned pile-and-timber piers used in connection with fishing industry in this locality are adequate for existing commerce. A marina which will accommodate about 12 small recreational craft, and a slip with facilities for loading oyster shells are located near the mouth of the bayou, and are maintained by the Alabama Department of Conservation. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Operational studies cost $2,509 and, engineering, design, supervision and administration $5,579. Condition at end of fiscal year. That portion of the project authorized prior to the 1969 modification was completed in 1956. Construction authorized in 1969 was initiated 31 March 1975 and completed 26 March 1976. Total Federal costs under existing project as of September 30, 1981 were $325,051 for new work and $64,378 for maintenance, a total of $389,429. Contributed funds expended for new work amount to $100,000. 4. BAYOU LA BATRE, ALA. Location. Bayou La Batre is a tidal stream about 10 miles long, emptying into Mississippi Sound on the southern coast of Mobile County, Ala., about 10 miles northwest of Cedar Point, the southern tip of the western mainland shore of Mobile Bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11373.) Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1945, page 844. Existing project, The authorized project provides for a 12-foot by 100-foot channel from 10-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 the 12-foot depth in Mississippi Sound to a point about 2,800 feet south of the highway bridge, thence a channel 12 feet deep by 75 feet wide to the bridge, an overall distance of about 33,500 feet, with the channel widened at a point 0.6 mile below the bridge to provide a turning basin 12 feet deep and about 2.6 acres in area. Mean tidal range is 1.75 feet, and extreme, except during storms, is 3.75 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Wooden wharves have been provided at seafood processing plants and public launching ramps are available. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and operation studies amounted to $9,188. Engineering, design, supervision and administration costs amounted to $3,502. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was modified December 30, 1966 under the discretionary authority of the Chief of Engineers to include a turning basin. The project, was completed in March 1967. Total Federal costs under existing project as of September 30, 1981 were $311,095 for new work and $1,137,992 for maintenance, a total of $1,449,087. Contributed funds from local interests for new work amount to $10,500. 5. BILOXI HARBOR, MISS. Location. The project is located on Mississippi Sound in southeastern Mississippi, 32 miles by water west of Pascagoula Harbor, Mississippi, and 14 miles east of Gulfport Harbor, Mississippi (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11373.) Previous project. For details see page 584, Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a continuous channel 12 feet deep, 150 feet wide and 23 miles long from the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway through Mississippi Sound east of Deer Island, Biloxi Bay, Back Bay, Cranes Neck, and a land cut to Gulfport Lake, including a 500-foot by 2,600-foot basin in the lake, thence a 12-foot deep by 100-foot wide channel for about two miles westward from the west end of the lake, terminating in a 300-foot by 500-foot basin; a 12- foot by 100-foot channel from the main channel in Big Lake to and up Bayou Bernard to the Air Force oil terminal at about mile 2.6; a 12-foot by 150-foot spur channel from the main channel in Biloxi Bay for about one mile, terminating in a 400-foot by 600-foot lateral channel westward about 2.2 miles to Biloxi's south waterfront; a 10- foot by 150-foot channel from Mississippi Sound, passing west of Deer Island to a point where it connects to the 12-foot by 150-foot lateral channel at Biloxi's south waterfront. Construction for the modifications authorized by River and Harbor Act of Nov. 7, 1966 was commenced in FY 1974 and completed in Feb. 1975. Further modifications to the project were authorized by the Chief of Engineers on 28 March 1979, which provided for a channel 10 feet deep, 100 feet wide and 300 feet long extending northward from the Biloxi Lateral Channel, and into a rectangular basin, approximately 300 by 370 feet. Cost of modification as authorized by the 1966 River and Harbor Act was $664,390. That portion of the project providing for an entrance channel six feet deep, 50 feet wide, and about 1,800 feet long into Old Fort Bayou, as authorized by the 1945 River and Harbor Act, is inactive and excluded from the foregoing cost estimate. Estimated cost (1954) of this portion was $6,000. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. A number of wooden piling-and-timber piers for small craft and fishing boats, a bulk gasoline terminal, several boat ways, and concrete products plant are available. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: The contractors dredge, Paul F. Jahneke, operating in the east access and west approach channels during the period 13 August thru 1 September 1981 removed 1,246,538 cubic yards of material at a cost of $898,811. Other costs included: condition and operation studies $55,046; water control management $5,060; and, engineering, design supervision and administration and other costs $33,627. Project condition surveys cost $1,577. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project, prior to the modification authorized in 1966, was commenced in 1931 and completed in 1962. This 1966 authorized modification was completed in FY 1975. The 1979 modification was completed in FY 1980. Total Federal costs under existing project as of 30 September 1981 were $1,171,054 for new work and $4,780,933 for maintenance, a total of $5,951,987. Contributed funds for new work amount to $102,600. 6. BLACK WARRIOR AND TOMBIGBEE RIVERS, ALA. Location. Black Warrior River rises in northern Alabama above Birmingham and flows generally southwesterly to unite with the Tombigbee River at Demopolis, Alabama. Thence, the Tombigbee flows south, uniting with the Alabama River to form the Mobile River 45 miles 10-4 MOBILE, ALA., DISTRICT above the head of Mobile Bay. Distance by water from Mobile to the vicinity of Birmingham is about 415 miles. Previous project. For details see page 732, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The authorized project provides essentially for a canalized channel nine feet deep and 200 feet wide from the mouth of the Tombigbee River, 45 miles above Mobile, to the vicinity of Birmingham, via the Tombigbee and Black Warrior Rivers, to mile 430.4 on Sipsey Fork, mile 429.6 on Mulberry Fork and mile 407.8 on Locust Fork, and for maintenance by snagging of Mobile River above the mouth of Chickasaw Creek, a total waterway distance of about 408 miles. The total lift of 255 feet is accomplished by six locks and dams. The original construction program, consisting of 17 dams with 18 lifts, was completed in 1915. Replacement of the original structures with new locks and dams, under the modernization program is as follows: William Bacon Oliver replaced locks 10, 11, and 12; Demopolis replaced locks 4, 5, 6, and 7; Warrior replaced locks 8 and 9; Coffeeville (Jackson) replaced locks 1, 2, and 3; and Holt replaced locks 13, 14, 15, and 16. Thus, 16 of the original locks have been replaced by five new locks. Bankhead Lock and Dam (Lock 17) is under rehabilitation to replace the original double lift lock with a single lift lock. The Jackson Lock and Dam wildlife refuge, authorized in 1960, includes 4,250 acres within the reservoir area and along its boundaries. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Tidal influence extends upstream from Mobile 101.6 miles to the old lock 1, where tidal effect is apparent only at low stages of the river. At Mobile the mean and extreme tidal ranges are 1.5 and 3.6 feet, respectively. These are at times slightly increased by the effect of winds. The greatest fluctuation of river stages is at Demopolis, Ala., the maximum being 59.7 feet. Maximum fluctuations at other points are 40 feet at lock 1,100.6 miles from Mobile; 57.8 feet at Tuscaloosa, 346.1 miles from Mobile; 13 feet at Birmingport, 404.9 miles from Mobile; and 27 feet at Cordova, 424.3 miles from Mobile. Ordinary fluctuations at these points are at old lock 1, 20 feet; at Demopolis, 35 feet; at Tuscaloosa, 40 feet; at Birmingport, four feet; and at Cordova, seven feet. Works of improvement reduced the amount of fluctuations at different points by three to 10 feet. Estimated costs (1980) of major rehabilitations at John Hollis Bankhead Lock and Dam is $49,800,000, and cost of providing recreation facilities at completed projects (Code 710) is $1,510,000. Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation have been fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Docks, storage facilities, and handling equipment have been provided as required at most loading and unloading points along the waterway. These include facilities for handling petroleum and petroleum products, coal, ores, sand and gravel, pulpwood, manufactures, and various other commodities. While most terminal facilities are privately owned, many are available for use by the general public. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Table 10-C for existing locks and dams.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: John Hollis Bankhead Lock and Dam: Rehabilitation of lock and dam: Buildings, grounds and utilities cost $73,644. Engineering, design and other costs amounted to $15,580. Costs for recreational facilities at Demopolis Lock and Dam amounted to $30,510; Holt Lock and Dam $3,990; and, $5 at Warrior Lock and Dam. Recreational facility cost on the various lakes amounted to $1,000. Recreational attendance at locks and dams during CY 1980 totaled 4,819,900 recreational user days. Maintenance: Four contractors' dredges operating during the period 1 October 1980 thru 7 August 1981, removed 3,004,580 cubic yards of material at a cost of $4,942,066 from various locations along the waterway. The snagboat Ros removed 2,650 obstructions at a cost of $79,236. Other general charges for the waterway included: locks and dams, $133,334; operation studies, $833,973; water control management, $361,131; permanent operating equipment, $40,865; and, engineering, design, supervision, administrative and other costs, $773,753. Other maintenance costs for the system include: Jackson Lock and Dam, $1,235,258; Demopolis Lock and Dam, $351,295; Warrior Lock and Dam, $378,320; Oliver Lock and Dam, $649,042; Bankhead Inck and Dam, $399,103; Holt Lock and Dam, $1,525,317; and reservoir operation, $1,411,130. Condition at end offiscal year. Work on the project, commenced in 1887, was essentially completed in 1915. Since then three of the original locks and dams (10, 11, and 12) were replaced by William Bacon Oliver (Tuscaloosa) Lock and Dam which was opened to navigation in August 1939; four original locks and dams (4, 5, 6 and 7) were replaced by Demopolis Lock and Dam which was opened to navigation in August 1954; two original locks and dams (8 and 9) were replaced by Warrior Lock and Dam which was opened to navigation in October 1957; three original locks and dams (1, 2, and 3) were replaced by Coffeeville Lock and Dam which was opened to navigation in August 1960; and four original locks and dams 10-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 (13, 14, 15, and 16) were replaced by Holt Lock and Dam which was opened to navigation in June 1966. Rehabilitation of the spillway at John Hollis Bankhead Lock and Dam commenced in 1966, and physically completed 6 February 1970. Replacement of the double lift lock with a single lift lock at John Hollis Bankhead Lock and Dam commenced in April 1970 and was essentially completed in 1980. The cost to September 30, 1981 for replacement of the lock was $49,802,402. The power plant at John Hollis Bankhead Lock and Dam was built and is operated by the Alabama Power Co. Total Federal costs under existing project as of September 30, 1981 were $152,775,958 for new work and $114,666,262 for maintenance, a total of $267,442,220. 7. BLACKWATER RIVER, FLA. Location. The river rises in south-central Alabama and flows southwesterly 75 miles through Alabama and Florida, emptying into Blackwater Bay, an arm of Pensacola Bay (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11382.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Report for 1949. Existing projects. The project provides for a 9- foot by 100-foot channel from the mouth upstream for 12 miles to Milton. Plane of reference is mean low water. The improved portion of the river is tidal throughout. Mean range is 2 feet and extreme 3 feet, except during storms. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Terminal facilities. A terminal serving a grain elevator and a petroleum terminal at Milton, and natural landings along the river are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Supervision and administration cost $684. Reconnaissance and condition surveys cost $5,813. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was commenced in 1906 and completed in 1916. Total Federal costs under existing project as of September 30, 1981 were $36,650 for new work and $260,538 for maintenance, a total of $297,188. 8. BON SECOUR RIVER, ALA. Location. Rises 2 miles south of Foley, Ala., and flows southerly about 8 miles, emptying into Bon Secour Bay, an arm of Mobile Bay in southwest Alabama. Existing project. A 10- by 80-foot channel from Gulf Intracoastal Waterway through Bon Secour Bay to mouth of Bon Secour River and extending up river to vicinity of Swifts Landing, thence 6 by 80 feet up river to a point about 600 feet above Oak Landing with two turning and maneuvering areas 150 feet wide and 1,100 to 1,200 feet long opposite Swifts Landing and ice loading dock. Plane of reference is mean low water. Overall length of improvement is about 4.7 miles. Mean tidal range is about 1.5 feet and extreme,, except during storms, is 3.5 feet. Existing project was authorized by Chief of Engineers, May 16, 1963, under authority in Section 187, River and Harbor Act of 1960. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. A number of pile-andtimber marginal, wharves used by seafood industry and a marine ways located along existing project. These, together with numerous privately owned piers, are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and operation studies cost $18,714; project condition surveys cost $48; and, supervision and administration cost $34. Condition at end offiscal year. Project was commenced in July and completed in October 1964. Total Federal costs under existing project as of September 30, 1981 were $118,615 for new work and $97,226 for maintenance, a total of $215,841. Contributed funds for new work amounted to $9,700. 9. CADET BAYOU, MISS. Location. Cadet Bayou (also known as Bayou Caddy), is a small tidal stream in southwest Hancock County, Mississippi, which flows easterly through marshland and empties into Mississippi Sound about 10 miles southwest of Bay St. Louis, Mississippi. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11371). Existing project. The existing project provides for an 8- by 100-foot channel from the 8-foot depth in Mississippi Sound for about 7,800 feet to the mouth of Cadet Bayou, thence an 8- by 80-foot channel extending 700 feet into the bayou to a 6- by 60-foot turning basin (in addition to the 80-foot channel width) 130 feet long, thence a 6- by 60- foot channel continuing upstream for 8,800 feet to a second turning basin 110 feet wide (in addition to the 60-foot channel width) and 100 feet long thence a 6- by 60-foot channel approximately 870 feet to the end of the project. The total length of improved channel is about 18,400 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean range of tide is about 1.6 feet in the vicinity of Cadet Bayou. Extreme range, except during storms is about 3.5 feet. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Several privately-owned pile-and-timber wharves, a boatyard, marine, 10-6 MOBILE, ALA., DISTRICT ways near the mouth, and several natural landings are located along the bayou. A fishing camp at mile 2 provides necessary facilities for recreational boating needs, including about 250 feet of marginal wharf. Local interests will be required to provide, maintain, and operate a public wharf for commercial boating interests near the mouth of the bayou, and another for recreational boating interests in the upper reaches. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Hired labor costs included condition and operation studies, $3,152; engineering, design, supervision and administration $3,248. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was commenced and completed in December 1970. Total Federal costs under existing project as of September 30, 1981 were $87,921 for new work and $496,407 for maintenance, a total of $583,698. Contributed funds for new work amount to $31,000. 10. DAUPHIN ISLAND BAY, ALA. Location. The project is located between Dauphin and Little Dauphin Island on the west side of the entrance to Mobile Bay, about 30 miles south of Mobile, Alabama and 55 miles west of Pensacola, Florida. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11376.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for: (a) A channel seven feet deep and 150 feet wide from Mobile Bay to an anchorage basin of the same depth, and about seven acres in area, in the marsh just north of Fort Gaines on Dauphin Island; a channel four feet deep and 40 feet wide from the anchorage basin to Dauphin Island Bay; and a jetty and revetment to protect the entrance channel; and (b) an anchorage basin seven feet deep and 500 feet square at Dauphin Island Village, with an entrance channel of like depth, 100 feet wide and about 8,300 feet long, extending to the 7-foot hydrographic contour in Mississippi Sound. Mean tidal range is 1.1 feet, and extreme, except during storms is about four feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation have been fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Several privately-owned wharves for handling seafood, a public dock and mooring slip, and a pier for recreational craft are located on the village basin. A marina, public launching ramp, and a number of private piers are located on the bay. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: None. Maintenance: Hired labor costs included $55,062 for operation studies and $1,183 for engineering, design, supervision and administration and other costs. Condition at end offiscal year. The project was completed in July 1959. Total Federal costs under existing project as of September 30, 1981 were $292,864 for new work and $922,538 for maintenance, a total of $1,215,402. 11. DOG AND FOWL RIVERS, ALA. Location. Dog and Fowl Rivers are primarily tidal streams emptying into the west side of Mobile Bay, 8.5 and 17 miles, respectively, south of central Mobile. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11376). Existing project. The Dog River project provides for an 8-foot deep by 150-foot wide channel from about 3,000 feet east of the Mobile Bay ship channel to and up Dog River, a total distance of 26,200 feet, thence six feet by 100 feet for 12,300 feet to a point about 2,400 feet above the mouth of Halls Mill Creek, and a 6-foot by 100- foot spur channel from the main channel to the mouths of Perch and Halls Mill Creeks. Overall length of the proposed improvement is about 7.8 miles. This portion of the project has not been constructed due to local interest's inability to comply with cost-sharing responsibilities. The Fowl River project provides for a channel eight feet deep and 100 feet wide from Mobile Bay into and up Fowl River to deep water about 6,700 feet above its mouth. Total length of the channel is about 2.6 miles. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean range of tide is about 1.5 feet in Dog River. Extreme range during storms is about 3.6 feet. This segment of the project was completed in November, 1973. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for the Fowl River portion. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities consist of a boatyard for fabricating steel vessel hulls, nine marinas, four marine ways, a yacht basin on Dog River; two marinas on Fowl River, and numerous timber piers and docks on both rivers. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Hired labor costs included $374 for water control management, $1,965 for condition and operation studies, and, $575 for engineering, design, supervision and administration. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was commenced in August 1973 and completed in November 1973. Total Federal costs on the existing project as of September 30, 1981 were $862,122; $190,695 for new work and $671,427 for maintenance. Contributed funds for 10-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 new work amounted to $114,100. 12. EAST PASS CHANNEL FROM GULF OF MEXICO INTO CHOCTAWHATCHEE BAY, FLA. Location. East Pass Channel is located in the entrance from the Gulf into Choctawhatchee Bay at eastern end of Santa Rosa Island, 48 miles east of the entrance into Pensacola Bay and 49 miles west of the new entrance to St. Andrews Bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11388.) Previous project. For details see page 672 of Annual Report for 1937. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a 12-foot by 180-foot channel from the Gulf of Mexico into Choctawhatchee Bay, and a 6-foot by 100-foot channel from East Pass Channel into Old Pass Lagoon. The project consists also of two converging jetties spaced 1,000 feet apart at the seaward end. The west jetty is provided with a low weir section 1,000 feet long to permit passage of littoral drift into a dredged deposition basin 500 feet by 1,500 feet located between the west jetty and the navigation channel. Mean range of tide is 1.3 feet; extreme range, except during storms, is 2.5 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. (See Table 10-B for authorizing tegislation.) Local cooperation. Responsibilities of local cooperation have been complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Small privately-owned pile-and-timber piers used in connection with the fishing industry in this locality are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: The contractors dredge, Little Rock, operating in the entrance channel to Old Pass Lagoon removed 43,941 cubic yards of material at a cost of $253,825. Hired labor costs included $62,293 for condition studies; $2,949 for water control management and $43,519 for engineering, design, supervision, administrationand other costs. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the 1965 modification was commenced October 1967 and completed January 1969. Total Federal costs under existing project as of September 30, 1981 were $916,715 for new work and $3,501,045 for maintenance, a total of $4,417,760. Contributed funds for new work from local interests amount to $398,000. 1&. EAST PEARL RIVER, MISS. AND LA. Location. The project is located at the mouth of East Pearl River, in a main tributary of Pearl River, Mississippi and Louisiana, which forms the boundary between southern Louisiana and Mississippi. Its mouth is 35 miles by water west of Gulfport Harbor, Miss., and 35 miles east of New Orleans, La., via Gulf Intracoastal Waterway. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11371.) Previous project. For details see page 1846 Annual Report for 1915 and page 504, Annual Report for 1934. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 9 feet deep, 200 feet wide, and about 1.3 miles long, at the mouth of East Pearl River, connecting the 9-foot contour in Lake Borgne with the same contour in East Pearl River. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is about 1.75 feet; while the extreme range is about 3.5 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminalfacilities. Natural available landings are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Hired labor for the year included $50 for supervision and administration and $8,774 for project condition surveys.. Condition at end offiscal year. This project was completed in January, 1911. Total Federal costs under existing project as of September 30, 1981 were $8,928 for new work and $471,438 for maintenance, a total of $480,366. The responsibility of this project was transferred to Vicksburg District, Lower Mississippi Valley Division on 1 October 1981. No further reporting on this project will be made by Mobile District. 14. ESCAMBIA AND CONECUH RIVERS, FLA. AND ALA. Location. The river is a single stream which rises in central Alabama, flows southwesterly to the Florida State line, thence southerly through Florida to Escambia Bay, an arm of Pensacola Bay. That part of stream in Alabama is known as Conecuh River and that in Florida as the Escambia River. (See Coast and Geodetic Chart 11382.) Previous project. For details see page 554 Annual Report for 1961. Existing project. The project provides for a 10- foot wide by 100-foot deep channel in Escambia Bay for 5.5 miles to the mouth of Escambia River, thence up Escambia River to about mile 7, thence a channel five feet deep for 50.9 miles to the Florida State line, and thence improvement of Conecuh River to the mouth of Patsaliga Creek, a distance of 79.5 miles. The project, including the portion in Escambia Bay, is 142.9 miles long. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean range 10-8 MOBILE, ALA., DISTRICT of tide at the mouth of the river is 1.5 feet and extreme range, except during storms, is three feet. Ordinary seasonal fluctuation at the state line does not exceed eight feet. The highest flood stage on record (1919) was 31.3 feet at the state line and 50.6 feet at River Falls, Alabama, 137.5 miles above the mouth. The existing project was completed in 1960 at a cost of $137,324. (See Table 10- B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Responsibilities of local cooperation have been fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Chemstrand Corporation, at mile 7, provides a barge slip and facilities for handling and storing industrial chemicals and other materials received at their plant. Gulf Power Company, at mile 4, maintains a slip, marginal wharf, and facilities for handling coal. These facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Costs for the year included $10,752 for project condition surveys and $237 for supervision and administration. .Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project, prior to adoption of the modification authorized by the 1958 River and Harbor Act, was commenced in 1881 and completed in 1882. Construction of the modification authorized in the "1958 River and Harbor Act was commenced and completed in 1960. Total Federal costs under existing project as of September 30, 1981 were $137,324 for new work and $940,620 for maintenance, a total of $1,077,584. 15. FLY CREEK, ALA. Location. Fly Creek (Volanta Bayou) is a small stream about 4.5 miles long rising in Baldwin County, Ala., 3 miles east of town of Fairhope, from whence it flows northerly, thence westerly and southerly, to form an estuary on eastern shore of Mobile Bay just north of Faihope and about 13 miles southeast of Mobile, Ala. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 11376.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 6 feet deep, 80 feet wide, and about 1,650 feet long from 6-foot depth in Mobile Bay to a turning basin of same depth, 100 feet wide and 350 feet long, in Fly Creek. Mean tidal range in vicinity of project is about 1.3 feet, and extreme, except during storms, is 3.5 feet. Existing project was authorized by the River and Harbor Act of May 17, 1950, (H. Doc. 194, 81st Cong., 1st Sess.). The project document contains the latest published map. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Fairhope Yacht Club has facilities for small recreational craft on both banks near mouth of creek, consisting of a small pile-and timber service wharf, several sheet metal boat sheds, boat slips, and other mooring facilities. There is also a marginal timber wharf and shed for commercial fishing boats on right bank of creek immediately above first bend. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Project condition surveys costs $264 and supervision and administration cost $1,423. Condition at end offiscal year. Project was commenced in August and completed in October, 1957. Total project costs as of September 30, 1981 amounted to $227,621 of which $29,000 was for new work and $198,621 for maintenance. 16. GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN APALACHEE BAY, FLA., AND MEXICAN BORDER (MOBILE DISTRICT) Location. The project extends westward from Apalachee Bay, Florida, along the Gulf coast to the Rigolets, Louisiana, via a series of coastal lakes, bays, sounds, and land cuts. (For further details see Annual Report for 1962.) Previous project. For details see page 906, Annual Report for 1930. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a waterway 12 feet deep and 125 feet wide at mean low water from Apalachee Bay, Florida, to Mobile Bay, Alabama, and 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide from Mobile Bay, Alabama, to Rigolets, Louisiana (Lake Borgne Light No. 29), and for a tributary channel (Gulf County Canal), 12 feet deep, 125 feet wide and about six miles long connecting Intracoastal Waterway at White City, Florida, with St. Joseph Bay. The waterway between the 12-foot depth contours in Apalachee Bay and Lake Borgne Light No. 29 at the Rigolets is 379 miles long. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Responsibilities of local cooperation have been fully complied with for the work authorized prior to 1966. For modification of the Gulf County Canal which was authorized by the 1966 River and Harbor Act, local interests must provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way required in connection with disposal of spoil, or the costs of such retaining works; hold and save the United States free from all damages due to construction and maintenance of the project including damages to wharves, piers, bridges, and other structures; provide and maintain at local expense adequate terminal and transfer facilities open to all on equal terms; provide and maintain without cost to the United States depths in berthing areas 10-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 commensurate with depths provided in related project area; and accomplish without cost to the United States such alterations as required in sewer, water supply, drainage, and other facilities as well as their maintenance. Terminal facilities. Facilities are available for public use at Carrabelle, Apalachicola, Panama City, and Pensacola, Florida; Mobile and Bayou La Batre, Alabama; and Pascagoula, Biloxi, Gulfport, Pass Christian, and Bay St. Louis, Mississippi. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Carrabelle - Apalachicola Bay section: Hired labor costs included $7,683 for condition and operation studies and $17,075 for water control management. Apalachicola Bay - St. Andrew Bay section: Hired labor costs included $38,639 for condition and operation studies; $1,264 for water control management studies; $5,032 for channels and canals, and, $13,074 for supervision and administration and miscellaneous costs. St. Andrew Bay - Choctawhatchee Bay section: Hired labor cost for the year included: bank stabilization $184,544; permanent operating equipment $8,818; condition and operation studies $34,834; channels and canals $73,422; and, engineering, design, supervision, administration and other costs $17,027. Choctawhatchee Bay - Pensacola Bay section: Costs for the year include condition and operation studies, $1,299; bank stabilization, -$72,395; and engineering, design, supervision and administration, $9,246. Pensacola Bay - Mobile Bay section: The contractors' dredges, Little Rock, and Manchac, operating for a period of 30 days during the year removed 56,355 cubic yards of material at a cost of $379,501. Other costs included: condition and operation studies, $133,775; water control management, $15,739; bank stabilization, $7,977; and, engineering, design, supervision and administration, $49,569. Mobile Bay - Rigolets section: Hired labor costs included $124,250 for condition and operation studies and $4,800 for engineering, design, supervision, and administration. In addition, compliance inspections cost $247,567; direct charges to Mobile Area Office cost $16,722; and, direct charges to Panama City Area Office were $968. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project is complete except for the portion between Apalachicola Bay and St. Marks, Florida, which is deferred for restudy. Modification of the Gulf County Canal to provide a 12-foot by 125-foot channel was commenced July 1968 and completed June 1969. Total costs of the existing project to September 30, 1981, were $35,296,969, of which $6,434,694 was for new work and $28,862,275 for maintenance. 17. GULFPORT HARBOR, MISS. Location. The project is located on Mississippi Sound in southeastern Mississippi, about 44 and 90 miles by water west of Pascagoula Harbor, Mississippi, and Mobile Harbor, Alabama, respectively, and 78 miles east of New Orleans (via Gulf Intracoastal Waterway). (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11373.) Previous project. For details see page 747, Annual Report for 1938, and page 995, Annual Report for 1948. Existing project. The authorized project provides for: (a) A channel 32 feet deep, 300 feet wide, and about eight miles long across Ship Island Bar, a channel 30 feet deep, 220 feet wide, and about 11 miles long through Mississippi Sound, and an anchorage basin at Gulfport 30 feet deep, 1,320 feet wide, and 2,640 feet long; and (b) maintenance of the existing commerical smallboat harbor about 26 acres in area, and a straightapproach channel, 100 feet wide and about 4,300 feet long, from deep water in Mississippi Sound to a small-boat basin, all at a depth of eight feet. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is about 1.75 feet, and extreme range, except during storms, is about 3.5 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Conditions of local cooperation have been fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Existing modern railconnected terminal facilities at this port are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series 19, revised in 1979.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: The contractors' pipeline dredge, Buster Bean and the hopper dredge, Dodge Island operating during the period 24 December 1980 thru 20 February 1981, removed a total of 3,239,555 cubic yards of material from the ship channel, harbor and outer bar at a cost of $2,486,688. Hired labor included condition and operation studies $108,528 and engineering, design, supervision and administration cost of $56,725. Condition at end offiscal year. The main harbor was commenced 1932 and completed April 1950. Maintenance for small boat harbor and approach channel, constructed by local interests in 1950, was authorized by 1958 River and Harbor Act. Total Federal costs under existing project as of September 30, 1981 were $635,758 for new work 10-10 MOBILE, ALA., DISTRICT and $21,435,718 for maintenance, a total of $22,071,476. 18. MOBILE HARBOR, ALA. Location. The project is located along the lower five miles of Mobile River, in southwestern Alabama, 91 miles by water west of Pensacola Harbor, Florida, 90 miles east of Gulfport Harbor, Mississippi, and 144 miles by water northeast of mouth of Mississippi River. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11376.) Previous project. For details see page 503, Annual Report for 1963. Existing project. The authorized project provides for: (a) A 42-foot by 600-foot channel about 1.5 miles long across Mobile Bar; (b) a 40- foot by 400-foot channel in Mobile Bay to mouth of Mobile River; (c) a 40-foot channel in Mobile River to highway bridge, varying from 500 to 775 feet wide; (d) a 25-foot channel from highway bridge to and up Chickasaw Creek to a point 400 feet south of mouth of Shell Bayou, widths being 500 feet in Mobile River and 250 feet in Chickasaw Creek; (e) a turning basin 40 feet deep, 2,500 feet long, and 800 to 1,000 feet wide, opposite Alabama State Docks; (f) a turning basin 40 feet deep, 1000 feet wide, and 1,600 feet long opposite Magazine Point; (g) a 27-foot by 150-foot channel from Mobile Bay Channel along Arlington pier to a turning basin 800 feet long and 600 feet wide opposite Brookley Air Force Base ocean terminal, and continuing thence to a turning basin 250 feet wide and 800 feet long in Garrows Bend, thence a 22-foot by 150-foot channel to the causeway linking McDuffie Island to the mainland; (h) a channel 40 feet deep and 400 feet wide from the main ship channel in Mobile Bay and extending northwesterly for about 5.3 miles to the shore of Mobile Bay, including an anchorage and turning basin near the shoreline, thence a land cut 40 feet deep, 300 feet wide and 1.9 miles long to and including a 42 acre trapezoid turning basin 40 feet deep, and a barge channel 12-by 100-feet, extending 6500 feet and terminating in a 300-by 300-foot turning basin; and (i) maintenance of Three Mile Creek by snagging, from its intersection with Industrial Canal to Mobile River. The project provides also for an anchorage area 32 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and 2,000 feet long opposite site formerly occupied by the U.S. Quarantine Station at McDuffie (Sand) Island. Prior to widening the Mobile Bay Channel as authorized in 1954, the Quarantine Station anchorage area was maintained to a project width of 200 feet. Construction by local interests of a solid-fill causeway across Garrows Bend Channel between McDuffie Island and the mainland is also provided for under existing project. Total length of the bay and river channels is about 41.7 miles. Plane of reference is mean low water. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range at the lower end of the improvement is 1.2 feet and at the upper end 1.5 feet. Extreme tidal range is 3.4 feet at the lower end and 3.6 feet at the upper end. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation have been fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Modern rail-connected terminal facilities at this port are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 18, revised in 1979.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Channel excavation cost, $23,216,999, and, engineering, design, supervision and administration cost, $513,998, all for work on Theodore Channel. Maintenance: The contractor's dredge, Buster Bean, operating in the outer bar channel during the period 15 October thru 17 December 1980 removed 939,037 cubic yards of material at a cost of $1,239,455. Hired labor cost included dredging by hopper dredge, Langfitt of 167,591 cubic yards of material from Mobile River channel at a cost of $561,624 during the period of 15 October thru 17 December 1980. Other hired labor costs included: $1,035,829; water control management, $72,372; and, engineering, design, supervision and administration, $178,761. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was commenced in 1931 and completed in July 1965 except for the Theodore Channel portion, presently under construction. For details see Annual Report for 1965. Total Federal costs under existing project as of September 30, 1981 were $59,799,900 for new work and $50,218,805 for maintenance, a total of $110,018,705. Contributed funds for new work amounted to $2,658,966. 19. PANAMA CITY HARBOR, FLA. Location. The project is located on the northwest coast of Florida, 102 miles east of entrance to Pensacola Harbor. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11389.) Previous project. For details see page 710, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The authorized project (as modified) provides for a channel about 3.7 miles long extending from deep water in the bay (intersection of Bay Harbor and Dyers Point Channel) across Lands End to the Gulf of Mexico, 300 feet wide and 40 feet deep in the bay and across Lands End, and 450 feet wide, 42 feet deep and about 1.1 miles long in the approach channel in the Gulf, protected by two jetties, each about 10-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 700 feet long; branch channels 38 feet deep and 300 feet wide, leading from the inner end of the main entrance channel westward to the Port Authority terminal at Dyers Point and eastward to the Bay Harbor terminal, about 3.4 and 3.6 miles in length, respectively; turning and maneuvering areas comprising about 55 acres opposite Dyers Point, and 42 acres opposite Bay Harbor, both at a depth of 38 feet; and an anchoring and loading basin for LASH type intermodal carriers, 40 feet deep and containing about 177 acres in St. Andrew Bay near the inner end of the main entrance channel; a channel in Watson Bayou, 100 feet wide and 10 feet deep from that depth in St. Andrew Bay to the highway bridge, about 1.75 miles; channel 100 feet wide and 8 feet deep in Grand Lagoon to a point about 2,400 feet east of State Highway 392 Bridge, with branches to serve terminal facilities. The east and west jetties have been reworked and are presently about 2,075 and 2,896 feet long, respectively. Mean tidal range 1.3 feet and extreme 3.0 feet. (See Table 10- B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Available terminal facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 19, revised in 1979.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Hired labor cost amounted to $55,619 for condition and operation studies; $1,575 for service facilities; $3,079 for water control management; $25,554 for channels and canals; and, $15,403 for engineering, design, supervision, administration and other costs. Project condition surveys cost $9,104. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project (prior to modifications) was completed in November 1949. Repairs to jetties were commenced in June 1961 and completed October 1968. Modifications to the project at Grand Lagoon were completed in January 1972. Total Federal costs under existing project as of September 30, 1981 were $1,434,485 for new work and $3,436,490 for maintenance, a total of $4,870,975. Contributed funds expended for new work amount to $80,000. 20. PASCAGOULA HARBOR, MISS. Location. The project is located along lower 6.8 miles of Pascagoula River, the lower six miles of Dog River, and in Bayou Casotte (about four miles east of the mouth of Pascagoula River), in southeastern Mississippi, about 61 miles by water west of Mobile Harbor, Alabama, and about 44 miles by water east of Gulfport Harbor, Mississippi. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11373.) Previous project. For details see page 741, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The authorized project provides for (a) An entrance channel 40 feet deep and 350 feet wide from the Gulf of Mexico through Horn Island Pass, including an impounding area for littoral drift, 40 feet deep, 200 feet wide, and about 1,500 feet long adjacent to the channel at the west end of Petit Bois Island; (b) a channel 38 feet deep and 350 feet wide in Mississippi Sound and Pascagoula River to the railroad bridge at Pascagoula, including a turning basin 2,000 feet long and 950 feet wide (including channel area) on the west side of the river below the railroad bridge; (c) a channel 38 feet deep and 225 feet wide from the ship channel in Mississippi Sound to the mouth of Bayou Casotte, thence 38 feet deep and 300 feet wide for about one mile to a turning basin 38 feet deep, 1,000 feet wide, and 1,750 feet long; (d) a 22-foot deep by 150-foot wide channel up Pascagoula River from the railroad bridge to the mouth of Dog River, thence up Dog River to Highway 63 bridge; and (e) a 12-foot by 125-foot channel from the highway bridge, via Robertson and Bounds Lakes, to mile 6 on Dog River. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is 1.75 feet, and extreme range is 3.75 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminalfacilities. Modern rail-connected terminal facilities at this port are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 19, revised in 1979.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: The contractors dredge, Paul F. Jahncke operating during the period 23 thru 30 September 1981, removed 50,000 cubic yards of material from the Sound Channel at a cost of $310,000. Hired labor dredging cost $380,000 for the removal of 33,383 cubic yards of material from the Outer Bar Channel. Payment of previous year's contract amounted to $549,800. Condition and operation studies cost $159,430. Engineering, design, supervision and administration cost $52,422. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was completed in August 1965. Total Federal costs of existing project to September 30, 1981 were $5,668,543 for new work and $20,277,395 for maintenance, a total of $25,945,938. Contributed funds for maintenance amounted to $253,350. 10-12 MOBILE, ALA., DISTRICT 21. PEARL RIVER, MISS. AND LA. Location. Pearl River rises in east central Mississippi and flows southwest about 172 miles to Jackson, Mississippi, thence southeast about 269 miles to the head of its delta, where it divides into West Pearl and East Pearl Rivers. West Pearl River flows about 34 miles to the Rigolets, a tidal pass connecting Lake Pontchartrain with Lake Borgne, an arm of the Gulf of Mexico. Previous project. For details see page 750, Annual Report for 1938 and page 463, Annual Report for 1965. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel from the mouth of West Pearl River for 58 miles to the mouth of Bogalusa Creek at Bogalusa, Louisiana, seven feet deep at low water with a bottom width of 100 feet in the river sections and 80 feet in the canal section; with locks 65 by 310 feet clear inside dimensions. The plan of improvement may be divided into three sections as follows: the river section from the mouth of West Pearl River to mile 28.5 at Holmes Bayou with a channel seven feet deep and 100 feet wide to be obtained by dredging, snagging, and constructiQn of cutoffs and easement of critical bends at eight locations below lock one along Pearl River in its reach from its mouth to mile 26, all at a depth of seven feet; the canal section from mile 28.5 to 48.7 at Pools Bluff with a channel seven feet deep and 80 feet wide to be obtained by construction of three locks in the canal with sills across Bogue Chitto at mile 44 and across the river at mile 48.7; the river section from mile 48.7 to 58 at the mouth of Bogalusa Creek to be obtained by dredging, snagging and easing of bends. At Bogalusa the mean variation of water surface is 10 feet and extreme, 23 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. Estimated cost of the project (1980) is $8,429,100 including $8,274,494 for improvements completed prior to 1966, and $154,800 cost for providing recreational facilities (Code 710). (See Table 10-D for features of locks included in existing projects.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. The city of Bogalusa provides a barge terminal consisting of a wharf, transit shed, and access road at Richardson's Landing at the head of the project. A privately-owned wharf at the Pearl River Highway Bridge near Pearl River Station, Louisiana, is used for unloading logs. Only natural landings exist at various locations on the river. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Hired labor costs included $7,731 for locks, dams and reservoirs; $33, 168 for water quality management; $16,228 for permanent operating equipment; $7,900 for buildings, grounds and utilities; and $26,540 for engineering, design, supervision and administration and other costs. Income and credits to operations amounted to $10,496 and transfers of costs of property amounted to $12,556. Cost for Pearl River Reservoir amounted to $37,079. In addition, specific costs for various lock operations amounted to $60,562 for Lock No. 1, $23,810 for Lock No. 2, and $27,466 for Lock No. 3. Recreation attendance at the three locks during CY 1980 totaled 504,900 recreational user days. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project, prior to adoption of modifications authorized by the 1966 River and Harbor Act, was commenced in October 1938 and completed in January 1956. All locks were opened to navigation in November 1953. No work has been initiated on modifications (cut-offs and easements of bends below Lock 1) authorized by the 1966 Act. Total Federal costs under existing project as of September 30, 1981 were $8,418,465 for new work and $4,514,449 for maintenance, a total of $12,932,914. Contributed funds for new work amount to $65,000. The responsibility of this project was transferred to Vicksburg District, Lower Mississippi Valley Division, on 1 October 1981. No further reporting on this project will be made by Mobile District. 22. PENSACOLA HARBOR, FLA. Location. The project is located in a landlocked bay on the coast of northwest Florida about 50 miles east of the entrance to Mobile Bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 490 and 11382.) Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The authorized project provides for: (a) A 35-foot by 500-foot entrance channel about five miles long, from the Gulf of Mexico to lower Pensacola Bay; (b) a 33-foot by 300-foot bay channel; (c) two 33-foot by 300-foot parallel approach channels to opposite ends of the inner-harbor channel; (d) an inner-harbor channel 500 feet wide, 33 feet deep, and 3,950 feet long; (e) a 30-foot by 250-foot approach channel to the pierhead line south of Muscogee wharf; and (f) a 15-foot by 100-foot entrance channel into Bayou Chico, thence a channel 14 feet deep, 75 feet wide, and about 4,400 feet long to a turning basin 14 feet deep and 500 feet square. Mean range of tide throughout the harbor is about 1.1 feet near the entrance and about 1.6 feet at the head of bay. Extreme tidal range, except during storms, is about three feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. Modification of the Bayou Chico project to provide for enlarging the entrance channel to 21 10-13 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 by 100 feet, the bayou channel to 20 by 100 feet, and deepening the turning basin to 20 feet has been deferred for restudy. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminalfacilities. Modern rail-connected terminal facilities at this port are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 19, revised in 1979.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Work performed by hired labor, included dredging of 128,450 cubic yards of material from the Outer Bar channel at a cost of $255,000; condition and operation studies, $49,399; water control management, $2,820; and, engineering, design, supervision and administration, $7,627. Project condition surveys cost $268. Condition at end of fiscal year. New work is completed except those features which are deferred for restudy. The modification authorized in 1962 was commenced in March and completed in May 1965. Total Federal costs of the existing project to September 30, 1981 were $875,005 for new work and $3,840,432 for maintenance, a total of $4,715,437. 23. PERDIDO PASS CHANNEL, ALA. Location. The project is located about midway between Pensacola, Florida and Mobile, Alabama. (See Coast and Geodetic Chart 11378.) Existing project. The existing project provides for a channel 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide for about 1,300 feet from the Gulf of Mexico into the inlet, thence nine feet deep and 100 feet wide for about 2,200 feet to the highway bridge, where the channel branches into two arms, each having dimensions of 9 by 100 feet, one of which extends about 3,400 feet into Terry Cove and the other about 3,200 feet into the southern arm of Perdido Bay. The project also provides for two jetties spaced 600 feet apart at the seaward end. The east jetty has a low weir section, 1,000 feet long to permit passage of littoral drift into a dredged deposition basin 800 feet by 1,200 feet located between the east jetty and the navigation channel. Mean tidal range is 1.1 feet and extreme is 2.8 feet. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation have been fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Six marinas, numerous timber piers, docks, and several launching ramps are available. These facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: The contractors dredge, Little Rock, operating during the period 17 October thru 22 November 1980 removed 73,649 cubic yards of material from the main channel at a cost of $179,652. Hired labor costs included $62,987 for condition and operation studies and $57,389 for engineering, design, supervision and administration. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was commenced in May 1968 and completed in March 1969. Total Federal costs of the existing project to September 30, 1981 were $629,860 for new work and $3,309,289 for maintenance, a total of $3,939,149. Contributions from local interest amount to $510,000 for new work and $10,325 for maintenance. 24. PORT ST. JOE Location. The project is located on the northwest coast of Florida, 115 miles east of Pensacola Harbor. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 11389.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for: (a) An entrance channel 37 feet deep, 500 feet wide at its outer end and diminishing progressively in width to 400 feet at the first bend, a distance of 3.6 miles, thence continuing at a depth 37 feet and a width of 400 feet, through the second and third bend for 3.3 miles, thence continuing at a depth of 35 feet and a width of 300 feet 2.4 miles to a point in St. Joseph Bay where the entrance channel joins the north channel, a total overall distance of 9.3 miles, thence continuing in the north channel at a depth of 35 feet and a width of 300 feet to the north end of the turning basin at Port St. Joe, a distance of about 4.7 miles; (b) a turning basin 32 feet deep, 1,000 feet wide, and 2,000 feet long, and a harbor channel therein 35 feet deep, 250 feet wide, and 2,000 feet long, adjacent to the waterfront at Port St. Joe; and (c) a channel 27 feet deep, 200 feet wide and about 1 mile long leading from the south end of the turning basin to deep water in St. Joseph Bay. Average tidal variation is 1.4 feet and extreme, except during storms, is about 4 feet. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Rail and highwayconnected terminal facilities available at this port are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 19, revised in 1969.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Costs included condition and operation studies, $37,525; water control management, $11,702; and, engineering, design, supervision and administration, $774. Project condition surveys cost $1,794. Condition at end offiscal year. The project was completed in July 1962. Total Federal costs for the project as of September 30, 1981 were 10-14 MOBILE, ALA., DISTRICT $1,960,862 for new work and $2,151,380 for maintenance, a total of $4,112,242. Contributed funds for new work amount to $20,000. 25. REMOVING WATER HYACINTHS, MOBILE DISTRICT Location. The project is for all streams tributary to the Gulf Coast in Mobile District. Existing project. The authorized project provides for extermination or removal of plants from navigable waters of Florida, Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana, and Texas, so far as they are or may become an obstruction to commerce, by any mechanical, chemical, or other means whatsoever; for construction and operation of boats equipped with suitable machinery for such removal, and construction and operation of log booms to prevent plants drifting from one stream to another. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Extermination and removal of plants along the navigable coastal streams within the Mobile District was accomplished during FY 1981 at a cost of $972. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project, which is for maintenance, was commenced about 1899, and work has been carried on since that time. Total Federal costs for the project through September 30, 1981 amount 'to $1,099,226. 26. WATERWAY CONNECTING TOMBIGBEE AND TENNESSEE RIVERS, ALA. AND MISS. Location. The waterway extends from mile 215 in Pickwick pool on the Tennessee River, southerly through northeastern Mississippi and western Alabama, a total of 232 miles, to the confluence of the Black Warrior and Tombigbee Rivers at Demopolis, Alabama. Location. For details see Annual Report for 1953. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a waterway 234 miles long, connecting the Tennessee and Tombigbee Rivers via the East Fork of Tombigbee River and Mackeys and Yellow Creeks. The plan of improvement consists of three sections: (1) the river section, a 9-foot by 300-foot channel for 149 miles between Demopolis and Amory, Mississippi; (2) the lateral canal section, 12 feet by 300 feet for 46 miles from Amory to Bay Springs; and (3) the divide section, a 12-foot by 300-foot channel (except in the 27 mile-long divide cut in which the bottom width would be 280 feet) for 39 miles from Bay Springs through the dividing ridge to the Tennessee River; the total lift of 341 feet to be accomplished by 10 locks. Estimated (1981) Federal cost for new work is $1,839,000,000, including $9,600,000 for work by the U.S. Coast Guard, and $9,400,000 for National Park Service; plus, $164,000,000 'non-Federal cost for relocations. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must make and maintain alterations in highways and highway bridges and in sewer, water-supply, and drainage facilities and provide and maintain suitable and adequate river and canal terminals. Officials of the State of Mississippi were notified of these requirements on December 13, 1949, and officials of the State of Alabama were notified on December 20, 1949. Legislation enabling boards of supervisors of the various counties concerned to enter into agreements with the United States relative to navigation projects was adopted by the State of Mississippi in 1950. A compact between the States of Alabama, Mississippi, Tennessee, Kentucky, and Florida has been formed for the purpose of promoting the project. The name of this organization is the Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway Development Authority. During its 1962 session the Mississippi Legislature authorized the formation of the Tombigbee River Valley Water Management District. The District was organized in accordance with the enabling legislation and is empowered to fulfill the requirements of local cooperation for the portion of the project in Mississippi. A satisfactory resolution has been furnished. During its 1967 session the Alabama Legislature authorized formation of a public corporation to be named the Tombigbee Valley Development Authority for the purpose of further development of the Tombigbee River and tributary streams. The organization was formed in accordance with the enabling legislation and in a referendum held 5 December 1967 the voters of Alabama authorized a bond issue not to exceed $10,000,000 to finance participation in this project and the Tombigbee River and Tributaries project. A satisfactory resolution has been furnished. Terminal facilities. None. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Total cost of new work during the fiscal year was $117,448,766, of which $6,795,814 was for work on Demopolis Lake; $2,515,110 for Gainesville Lock and Dam; $8,580,349 for Aliceville Lock and Dam; $23,778,638 for Columbus Lock and Dam; $9,450,173 for Aberdeen Lock and Dam. Canal section cost included: Lock A, $3,843,820; Lock B, $17,667,032; Lock C, $17,787,040; Lock D, $15,052,544; Lock E, $8,628,484. Engineering, design, supervision, administration and other costs associated with the 10-15 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 overall project amounted to $3,349,762. Maintenance: Cost for operation of the completed portion of the project during the year amounted to $3,368,455, which included the removal of 178,752 cubic yards of material from the Demopolis Pool and 456,551 cubic yards of material from the Gainesville Pool at a cost of $1,594,668; general charges of $246,000; $266,065 for Gainesville Lock and Dam; $287,623 for Aliceville Lock and Dam; $210,007 for Columbus Lock and Dam; $51,495 for Aberdeen Lock and Dam; $67,546 for Lock "A"; $90 for Lock "E"; and $644,961 cost to various lakes, recreation facilities and management. Condition at end of fiscal year. Total Federal costs under the existing project as of September 30, 1981 were $594,634,584 for new work, and $6,245,426 for maintenance for a total of $600,880,010. Construction formally began December 12, 1972 and overall project is about 60 percent complete, including work being performed by Nashville District, which costs are not reported on by Mobile District. 27. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS (See Table 10-E.) 28. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Table 10-F.) 29. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645, as amended (Preauthorization). Studies conducted under this authority amounted to $123,057. (See Table 10-G.) Studies conducted under Section 103, 1962 River and Harbor Act, as amended, amounted to $9,722. (See Table 10-G.) Studies conducted under Section 54, Shoreline Erosion Control Demonstration Act of 1974, Public Law 93-251, amounted to $637. Studies conducted under Section 55 WRD Act of 1974 Public Law 93-251, for providing technical and engineering assistance to non-Federal public interests for developing methods for the prevention of shore and stream bank erosion control cost $687. Beach Erosion Control 30. AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECT (See Table 10-H.) 31. DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS) Projects deauthorized under Section 12, Public Law 251, 93rd Congress, as amended. (See Table 10-I.) 32. OKATIBBEE LAKE, MISS. Location. The project is located on Okatibbee Creek 37.7 miles above its mouth, in Lauderdale County, Mississippi, seven miles northwest of Meridian. Existing project. The project provides for a dam and reservoir for flood control, water supply, water quality control, fish and wildlife, and recreation. The dam consists of a compacted earth fill 6,540 feet long with the top elevation 369.8 feet above national geodetic datum, with top width of 18 feet. The spillway, which is located 1,500 feet east of the east end of the dam, is an unpaved free overflow type 1,500 feet long with a fixed crest at elevation 359. A sluice intake structure near the center of the dam serves a 9.0-foot diameter concrete conduit. Storage allocated for water supply and water quality control varies seasonally from 21,400 acre-feet to 34,300 acrefeet between a minimum elevation of 328 and topof- conservation-pool elevation varying from 339 to 343. Storage varying from 46,500 acre-feet to 59,500 feet between the top of the conservation pool and elevation 352 has been reserved exclusively for storage of flood waters. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Complied with to date. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Engineering and design of public use facilities cost $31,020. Maintenance: Costs for the year included: $68,602 for dams and reservoirs; $17,352 for service facilities; $192,720 for recreational management; $22,762 for condition studies; $34,865 for water control management; $46,715 for recreation facilities; $64,709 for permanent operating equipment; $15,840 for law enforcement; $104,473 for engineering, design, supervision and administration; and, $77,617 for miscellaneous. Credit to operations and real estate administration amounted to $75,268. Flood control benefits attributed to the project during FY 1981 amounted to $165,600. Recreation attendance at the reservoir during CY 1980 totaled 1,003,300 recreational user days. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in June 1965, and was completed in November 1968. Total Federal costs of the existing project as of September 30, 1981 were $9,048,648 for new work and $3,997,881 for maintenance, a total of $13,046,529. 10-16 MOBILE, ALA., DISTRICT 33. TALLAHALA CREEK LAKE, PASCAGOULA RIVER, MISS. Location. The project is on Tallahala Creek, 81.1 miles above its mouth, in Jasper County, Mississippi, 13 miles north of Laurel. Existing project. The project provides for a dam and reservoir for flood control, water supply, water quality control, recreation, and fish and wildlife enhancement. The dam will consist of a compacted earth fill 8,000 feet long, with top elevation 343.5 feet above national geodetic datum, or a maximum 71.5 feet above streambed elevation, with a top width of 18 feet, and a 300- foot long saddle dike with maximum height of 15 feet in the left abutment. The spillway which is 6,000 feet northeast of the left abutment, will consist of an unpaved, free-overflow type, 500 feet long, with fixed crest at elevation 335.0. A sluice intake structure near the center of the dam will serve an 8-foot diameter, horseshoe-shaped concrete conduit. The reservoir at maximum pool elevation 306.5 will have an area of 4,000 acres and a total capacity of 63,000 acre-feet of which 35,900 acre-feet between elevations 288.5 and 302.0 will be used for water supply, 20,000 acrefeet between elevations 302.0 and 306.5 will be used for water quality improvement, and 7,100 acre-feet below elevation 288.5 will consist of dead storage. A volume varying seasonally from 50,000 to 70,000 acre-feet between elevations 306.5 and 315.0 will be reserved for flood storage. Estimated Federal cost (1981) is $102,000,000. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests will be required to reimburse the United States for all costs allocated to water supply Act of 1958, as amended; and one-half of the separable first cost of the project allocated to general recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement. In addition, local interests are required to reimburse the United States for the annual operation, maintenance and replacement cost allocated to water supply, and bear all cost of operation, maintenance and replacement of recreation and fish and wildlife areas and facilities for initial development. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design cost, $147,694. Condition at end offiscal year. Construction has not been initiated. 34. EDINBURG LAKE, PEARL RIVER, MISS. Location. The project would be located on Pearl River about two miles east of Edinburg, Mississippi, and about 130 river miles above Jackson, Mississippi. Existing project. The project provides for a dam and reservoir for flood control, water quality control, general recreation, fish and wildlife enhancement, and area redevelopment. The dam will consist of a compacted earth-fill and concrete structure 7,154 feet long including spillway section and retaining wall. The top of dam elevation would be 412.5 national geodetic datum with a maximum height of 54 feet above the existing streambed. Top width of dam would be 32 feet. The gated spillway would have a length of 292 feet with the crest at elevation 375. Flow over the crest would be regulated by six tainter gates, 42 feet long and 23 feet high. To provide for maximum releases of about 594 c.f.s. for all pool levels of conservation storage, two sluices would be provided in the right abutment of the spillway. The reservoir at maximum pool elevation 395.6 (100-year flood pool) would have a pool area of 27,000 acres and a total reservoir storage capacity of 486,000 acre-feet. Of this amount, normal sedimentation storage would be 40,600 acre-feet; water quality, 90,200 acre-feet; recreation, 69,000 acre-feet; and flood control, 286,200 acre-feet. Normal pool elevation 282.0 would result in a 16,000 acre pool during the recreation season. The estimated Federal cost of the project (1981) is $165,000,000. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interest would be required to pay, contribute in kind, or repay (which may be through user fees) with interest, one-half the separable first costs of the project allocated to recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement, and bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement incurred therefore. Operations and results during fiscal year. Engineering and design, cost $2,105. 35. GORDONS CREEK, HATTIESBURG, MISS. Location. The project is located along the lower 12,320 feet of Gordons Creek between its mouth at Leaf River and Broad Street Bridge, within the city limits of Hattiesburg, Miss. Existing project. The authorized project provides for flood damage reduction along and upstream of the project limits by clearing, snagging, widening and the removal of debris. Local cooperation. Local interests have not completed relocations as required. Operatimns and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design cost $10,836. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction commenced in June 1979 and was completed in June 1980, except for relocations required by local sponsor. Total Federal costs for the project as of September 30, 1981 were $764,158, all for new work. 10-17 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 36. HOULKA CREEK, CHICKASAW AND CLAY COUNTIES, MISS. Location. The project is located along the lowermost 34.1 miles of Houlka Creek in Chickasaw. and Clay Counties, Mississippi. The upper limits of the project extend to Mississippi State Highway 32. Existing project. The authorized project provides for improvement by clearing, snagging and the removal of debris at selective locations along the 34.1 mile project length between top banks. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Cost for completion of operation and maintenance manual amounted to $723. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction commenced in July 1979 and was completed in November 1980. Total Federal costs for the project as of September 30, 1981 were $238,219, all for new work. 37. TOMBIGBEE RIVER, MISS. AND ALA. Location. The project is located on the Tombigbee River and its tributaries between the junction of Browns and Mackeys Creeks in Itawamba County, Mississippi, for a distance of 53 miles along the East Fork of the Tombigbee River, from Walkers Bridge at the junction of Browns and Mackeys Creeks to the Monroe County line, by clearing the banks of trees and underbrush to flood stage, the removal of drift jams and the excavation of 13 cutoff channels; and for additional channel improvements and related works for flood control of the Tombigbee River and tributaries above the mouth of and including the Noxubee River in accordance with plans approved by the Chief of Engineers, to protect people and valuable agricultural property from overflow waters of the Tombigbee River. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with on work done under the 1936 Flood Control Act. Work to be done under authority of the 1941 Flood Control Act requires local interest to provide all lands, easements, and rights-of-way for project construction; hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction of the project; and maintain and operate all the works after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Channel work cost $67,321. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project for Itawamba County, as authorized in the 1936 Flood Control Act, was completed during fiscal year 1940. No work has been done on the extension of the project authorized in the 1941 Flood Control Act. The over-all project, as modified, is about 47 percent completed. Total Federal costs of the existing project as of September 30, 1981 were $134,801 for new work and $1,219,023 for maintenance, a total of $1,353,824. 38. TOMBIGBEE RIVER TRIBUTARIES, MISS. AND ALA. Location. The Tombigbee River rises in extreme northeast Mississippi and flows southerly through eastern Mississippi and western Alabama, emptying into the Mobile River about 45 miles above its mouth at Mobile, Alabama. Tributaries to be improved for flood control are all in northeast Mississippi and northwest Alabama. Existing project. The authorized project provides for improvement of 22 tributaries of the Tombigbee River by means of channel clearing and snagging. Approved estimate of cost (1981) for new work is $163,146,600; consisting of $151,000,000 Federal funds, and $12,146,600 non-Federal funds. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must furnish lands and rights-of-way for construction; make all roads, highway bridge, and utility changes, alterations, additions, and relocations necessary for the project; hold the United States free from damages; prevent future encroachments along the improved channels; maintain all works after completion; and contribute $12,146,600 in cash or equivalent work. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design cost $649,352. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction commenced in June 1965, and the overall project is about five percent complete. Federal cost of existing project as of September 30, 1981 were $8,488,107 for new work. Contributed cost for new work has amounted to $49,752. 39. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Local flood-protection works for which inspection is performed under this heading consist of levee projects at West Point, Georgia, on the Chattahoochee River; Montezuma, Georgia, in the Flint River Basin; Elba and Geneva, Alabama, in the Choctawhatchee River Basin; Rome, Georgia, and Collinsville, Alabama, in the Alabama-Coosa River Basin; and channel rectification projects on Black Creek, Gadsden, Alabama, in the Alabama-Coosa River Basin; Old Town Creek, Tupelo, Mississippi; Big Brown Creek, Donovan Creek, Twenty Mile Creek, and Mantachie Creek, 10-18 MOBILE, ALA., DISTRICT Fulton, Mississippi; Houlka Creek, Chickasaw and Clay Counties; and Luxapalila Creek, Alabama, in the Tombigbee River Basin; Gordons Creek, Hattiesburg, Mississippi, Pascagoula River Basin; Murder and Burnt Corn Creeks, Brewton, Alabama, Conecuh River Basin; Sowashee Creek, Meridian, Mississippi, in Chickasawhay River Basin; Jackson and East Jackson, Mississippi, in the Pearl River Basin; Clanton, Alabama; Little Cove Creek, Glencoe, Alabama; Autauga Creek, Prattville, Alabama; Armuchee Creek, Armuchee, Georgia; Town Creek, Americus, Georgia; and Lake Douglas at Bainbridge, Georgia, in the Apalachicola- Chattahoochee-Flint Rivers Basin; and a drainage project in Jackson County, Florida. Projects at Rome and Montezuma, Georgia, and Collinsville, Alabama, include pumping stations. Inspections were made during FY 1981 to determine the extent of compliance with approved regulations for maintenance and operation of the projects. Responsible local officials were advised of inadequacies in maintenance and operation of the local flood protection works under their jurisdiction where appropriate. Follow-up for compliance of the deficient projects continued during the year. Fiscal year costs were $17,994. Total cost to September 30, 1981 was $245,994 charged to maintenance. 40. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 10-J) 41. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood Control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (Preauthorization). Snagging and Clearing for flood control pursuant to Section 208 of Flood Control Act of 1954, as amended. Emergency streambank and shoreline protection pursuant to Section 14 of the Flood Control Act of 1946, as amended. (See Table 10-K) Emergency flood control activities--repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation, and disaster relief activites under Public Law 8750. (See Table 10-K) Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Powers 42. ALABAMA-COOSA RIVERS, ALA. AND GA. Location. Alabama River is formed 18 miles above Montgomery, Alabama, by the junction of the Coosa and Tallapoosa Rivers. It then flows southwesterly through Alabama 318 miles and unites with the Tombigbee River about 45 miles north of Mobile, in southwestern Alabama, to form the Mobile River. (See Geological Survey maps for central and southwest Alabama.) The Coosa River is formed at Rome, Georgia, in northwest Georgia, by the junction of the Oostanaula and Etowah Rivers, which have their sources in southeastern Tennessee and northern Georgia. From Rome the Coosa River flows southwesterly through Georgia and Alabama 286 miles and unites with the Tallapoosa River near Montgomery, Alabama, at about the center of the State, to form the Alabama River. (See Geological Survey maps for northeast Alabama, southeast Tennessee, and northwest Georgia.) Previous project. Projects for Alabama River: for details see page 1837, Annual Report for 1915; page 725, Annual Report for 1938; and page 592, Annual Report for 1944. Projects for Coosa River: for details see page 1837, Annual Report for 1915; page 728, Annual Report for 1938; and page 594, Annual Report for 1944. Existing project. The authorized project provides for full development of the Alabama- Coosa Rivers and tributaries for navigation, flood control, power, recreation, and other purposes, in accordance with plans under preparation by Chief of Engineers, subject to modifications thereof which may be advisable for increasing development of hydroelectric power. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Public Law 436, 83rd Congress, suspended authorization of the comprehensive plan, insofar as it provides for development of hydroelectric power for Coosa River, to permit non-Federal interests to develop the Coosa River by construction of a series of dams in accordance with conditions of a license issued pursuant to Federal Power Act and in accordance with certain other provisions and requirements of the aforementioned public law. The present phase of improvement, now under construction, provides for construction of Jones Bluff and Millers Ferry multiple-purpose improvements, Claiborne Lock and Dam, and supplemental channel work providing for a ninefoot deep navigation channel from the mouth of the Alabama River to Montgomery, Alabama, and for construction of Carters Dam, a multiplepurpose improvement on Coosawattee River, Georgia. The total cost (1981) for new work on the present phase of Alabama-Coosa Rivers (exclusive of Coosa River navigation) is $285,381,017, consisting of $281,995,617 for structures, and $3,385,400 for supplemental channel improvements, exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects and $33,961,311 for Allatoona Lake. 10-19 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation will be determined as formulation of plans for development of projects progress. No action in the matter of local cooperation has been initiated. Terminal facilities. On the east bank of the river a natural landing connects with city streets at Montgomery. Wofford Oil Company has a small wharf about 10 miles below Montgomery equipped for handling petroleum products. There are also various natural landings along the river. Facilities and natural landings on Alabama River are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Construction continued on Carters Dam and Jones Bluff Lock and Dam. Expenditures for work at Jones Bluff amounted to $2,127,375, Millers Ferry $18,130, and Carters $1,201,528. Engineering and design for Coosa River navigation segment amounted to $6,862,288. Total cost of new work amounted to $10,209,321. Maintenance: The contractors dredges, Vicksburg and BTD-51, removed 2,129,000 cubic yards of material during the period 1 October thru 15 July 1981, all at a cost of $2,560,967. Condition and operation studies cost $350,430; water control management, $99,861; permanent operating equipment, $42,632; lands and damages, $5,807; buildings, grounds and utilities, $17,365; and, supervision, administration, engineering, design, and other costs amounted to $151,657. Coosa River Reservoir operations cost $282,288 and lock operations $444,074. In addition, operation of Jones Bluff Dam cost $1,828,691; Millers Ferry Lock and Dam, $2,024,013; Carters Lake, $1,735,269; all for a total maintenance cost of $9,565,378. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was initiated on Carters Dam in April 1962 on Millers Ferry Lock and Dam in April 1963, Claiborne Lock and Dam in May 1965, and Jones Bluff Lock and Dam in March 1966. Carters Dam was essentially completed in FY 1980. The authorized nine-foot navigation channel to Montgomery, Alabama was opened to traffic in January 1972. Overall construction is essentially complete at Millers Ferry Lock and Dam. Construction of Jones Bluff Lock and Dam is about 95 percent complete, and the overall project is 98 percent with completion scheduled for 1982. Total Federal costs of the existing project as of September 30, 1981 are $353,992,263, including $299,278,024 for new work and $54,714,239 for maintenance. (See Table 10-L) 42A.CARTERS LAKE, GA. Location. The damsite is in Murray County, Georgia, on the Coosawattee River 26.8 miles above its junction with Conasauga River, one of the headwater tributaries of the Alabama- Coosa system. It is 60 miles north of Atlanta near the town of Carters, Georgia. The reservoir is in both Murray and Gilmer Counties. Existing project. The authorized project consists of a 1,950-foot long rockfill dam across the river, three saddle dikes on the left bank, a 258- foot long high-level, gated spillway on the left bank, a power house on the right bank having two conventional units with a generating capacity of 125,000 kilowatts each and two pump-generating units of the same size, and a regulating dam 2,855 feet long with a gated spillway 208 feet long 1.5 miles downstream from the main dam. The lake has an area of 3,220 acres, at maximum power pool elevation 1,072, total capacity of 472,800 acre-feet, of which 134,900 acre-feet is usable for power and 95,700 acre-feet reserved for flood control and 242,200 acre-feet dead storage. For other information see description of Alabama-Coosa project. Operations and results during fiscal year. Total cost of new work amounted to $1,201,528 of which power plant cost $125,291; recreation facilities $1,079,945; engineering, design, supervision, and administration -$3,708. Maintenance: Operation and ordinary maintenance of the dam, reservoir, powerhouse, service and recreational activities, and administration incidental thereto cost $1,735,269. Gross power generation amounted to 553,140,000 kilowatt hours during FY 1981, of which 550,267,000 were delivered to Southeastern Power Administration. Recreation attendance during CY 1980 totaled 665,900 recreational user days. Reduced flood damages attributed to the Carters project and to the joint operation with Allatoona were non-existant during FY 1981 due to the rainfall distribution. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction which commenced in April 1962 was essentially completed in September 1980. 42B.CLAIBORNE LOCK AND DAM, ALA. Location. The site is in Monroe County at mile 81.8 on the Alabama River, 15 miles northwest of Monroeville and 5.7 miles upstream from the U.S. Highway 84 bridge. Existing project. The authorized project consists of a short earth dike on the right bank, a combination of a fixed-crest and gated spillway extending across the river channel and into the left bank, a navigation lock and mound on the left bank, and an earth dike extending across the left overbank to high ground. Normal upper pool is at 10-20 MOBILE, ALA., DISTRICT elevation 35 and the minimum pool will be elevation 32 to provide storage for reregulation of Millers Ferry powerplant releases. The 60-mile long reservoir has an area of 5,850 acres and a volume of 96,360 acre-feet. For other information see description of Alabama-Coosa projects. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: none. Maintenance: none. Recreation attendance during CY 1980 totaled 965,100 user days. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in May 1965 and was completed in FY 1976 at a total cost of $28,151,450. 42C.JONES BLUFF LOCK AND DAM, ALA. Location. The site is in Lowndes and Autauga Counties at mile 245.4 on the Alabama River, 26 miles west of Montgomery. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a navigation lock, a gated spillway, and a power plant located at mile 245.4. The normal upper pool is at elevation 125.0 and the minimum lower pool due to the Millers Ferry Lc ck and Dam is at elevation 80.0. The structures consist of earth dikes and a power plant on the right bank, a gated spillway in the river channel, a lock and mound on the left bank, and an earth dike extending upstream parallel to the Western Railway of Alabama. The total length of the structures is about 14,962 feet with maximum height above the foundation at the power plant intake about 101 feet. The power plant contains four 17,000-kw. units. The 88-mile long reservoir has an area of 12,300 acres at normal pool level and a total capacity of 234,200 acre-feet. The lock has a chamber 84 feet wide and 600 feet long and provides a 12-foot depth over the lower miter sill. The approved estimated (1981) cost is $84,600,000. For other information see description of Alabama-Coosa project. Operations and results during fiscal year. Total cost of new work amounted to $2,127,375, which included land and damages, $29,181; cultural resources, $8,700; roads, $236,833; recreation facilities, $1,434,369; engineering, design, supervision and administration, $111,782. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance cost amounted to $1,828,692. Gross power generation amounted to 251,900,000 kilowatt-hours during FY 1981, of which 250,158,000 were delivered to Southeastern Power Administration. Recreation attendance at R. E. "Bob" Woodruff Lake during CY 1980 totaled 2,078,400 user days. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in March 1966 is 95 percent complete, and is scheduled for completion in FY 1982. The first powerhouse unit was placed in operation in June 1975, with the last unit on line in November 1975. 42D.MILLERS FERRY LOCK AND DAM, ALA. Location. The site is in Wilcox County at mile 142.2 on the Alabama River, 10 miles northwest of Camden, Alabama, and 30 miles southwest of Selma. Existing project. The project consists of an earth dike on the right bank, a concrete, gravitygated spillway in the river channel, a lock and mound on the left bank, an earth dike extending downstream paralleling the lock, to the powerhouse intake structure; a powerhouse, and an earth dike extending to high ground on the left bank. Normal upper pool is at elevation 80. The powerplant contains three 25,000 kilowatt units. The 103-mile long reservoir has an area of 17,200 acres at normal pool level and a total capacity of 331,800 acre-feet. The lock chamber is 84 by 600 feet with a 13-foot depth over the miter sills. For other information see description of Alabama- Coosa project. Operations and results during fiscal year. Total cost of new work amounted to $18,130, of which $11,149 was for public use facilities and $6,981 was for engineering, design, supervision and administration. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance of lock, dam, powerhouse, reservoir, and administration incidental thereto cost $2,024,013. Gross power generation amounted to 325,547,000 kilowatt-hours during FY 1981, of which 323,157,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Southeastern Power Administration. Recreation attendance at William "Bill" Dannelly Reservoir during CY 1980 totaled 2,760,500 user days. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in April 1963. The lock was placed in temporary operation in June 1968 and opened to full use in November 1969. The powerhouse units were placed on line during April and May 1970. The project was essentially completed in 1980. Total Federal costs of the project as of September 30, 1981 were $62,698,378 for new work and $15,135,052 for maintenance, a total of $77,833,430. The remaining work to be done consists mainly of construction of recreational facilities. 42E.COOSA RIVER NAVIGATION Location. The Coosa River is one of the two major tributaries forming the Alabama River approximately 18 miles northeast of Montgomery, Alabama. From its source at the juncture of the Etowah and Oostanaula Rivers in northwest Georgia it flows southwesterly about 286 miles to join with the Tallapoosa River in forming the Alabama River. 10-21 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design for recreation facilities cost $175,420. Maintenance: Operation and ordinary maintenance of the dam, reservoir, powerhouse, service and recreational activities, and administration incidental thereto cost $3,881,048. Gross power generation at Allatoona Reservoir amounted to 95,492,900 kilowatt-hours during FY 1981, of which 93,753,700 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Southeastern Power Administration. Recreational attendance at Allatoona Lake during CY 1980 totaled 8,634,100 recreational user days. Benefits attributed to flood control storage and regulation as well as joint flood control operation with Carters Dams were negligible for FY 1981. Condition at end offiscal year. Construction of the existing project began in March 1944 and was completed in October 1955. Total Federal costs under existing project as of September 30, 1981 were $33,961,311 for new work and $29,538,587 for maintenance, a total of $63,499,898. Existing project. The improvement of the Alabama-Coosa River for navigation to Rome, Georgia was authorized by Congress in the River and Harbor Act of 1945. A report in House Document 320, transmitted to Congress on 27 January 1960, recommended that the navigation project for the Coosa River from Montgomery to Gadsden be accomplished after the waterway to Montgomery was assured. The plan of improvement identified in House Document 320 provided for a waterway 9 feet deep with widths of 200 feet to Montgomery, Alabama, and 150 feet to Rome, Georgia. The waterway to Montgomery has essentially been completed. The estimated 1981 cost is $1,140,910,000 of which $1,102,900,000 is Federal and $38,000,000 non-Federal. Operations and results during fiscal year. Funding was initiated in FY 1978 for preconstruction planning. FY 1981 costs were $6,862,288 for engineering, design, supervision and administration. 43. ALLATOONA LAKE, COOSA RIVER BASIN, GA. Location. The project is on Etowah River in Bartow County, Georgia, about 48 miles upstream from Rome, Georgia, about five miles due east of Cartersville, Georgia, and about 2,000 feet downstream from mouth of Allatoona Creek. The reservoir extends about 28 miles up the Etowah River at maximum power-pool elevation of 840 feet above mean sea level. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a dam and reservoir for flood control, regulation of streamflow for navigation, and development of hydroelectric power. Height above the river bottom of the concrete, gravitytype dam is about 190 feet from elevation, 690 feet to 880 feet national geodetic datum. The spillway, with crest at elevation 835, is controlled by nine tainter gates, 40 feet wide by twenty-six feet high, and two tainter gates, 20 feet wide by twenty-six feet high; having a combined discharge capacity of 321,000 cubic feet per second with the water surface at elevation 870.3. One 48-inch diameter sluicing conduit with a free discharge valve and four sluices, 5 feet-8 inches wide by 10 feet high, are included in dam. Installed generating capacity consists of two 36,000 kilowatt units and one 2,000 kilowatt unit, or a total of 74,000 kilowatts. Ultimate installed capacity will be 110,000 kilowatts. The reservoir, covering 19,200 acres at elevation 860, has a storage capacity of 670,000 acre-feet. The initial construction cost was $31,424,738, excluding the addition of recreation facilities at the completed project. (See Table 10- B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required (Sec. 2, Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938, applies). 44. APALACHICOLA, CHATTAHOOCHEE, AND FLINT RIVERS, ALA., GA., AND FLA. Location. The Apalachicola River is formed at the southwest corner of the State of Georgia by the junction of the Chattahoochee and Flint Rivers and flows south 108 miles emptying into Apalachicola Bay. Florida River enters the Apalachicola River from the east at mile 45.4 and the River Styx also enters from the east at mile 36.7 and Chipola River enters from the west at mile 28.2. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11401.) The Chattahoochee River, 418 miles long, rises in northeast Georgia and flows southwesterly to West Point, and thence southerly to join the Flint River at the southwest corner of Georgia, forming the Apalachicola River. (See Geological Survey maps for northwest Georgia.) The Flint River, 330 miles long, rises in west central Georgia, flows generally southeasterly to Albany, and thence southwest to the southwest corner of the State, where it joins the Chattahoochee River to form the Apalachicola River. (See Geological Survey maps for southwest Georgia.) Previous project. For details see page 484 for Annual Report for 1963. Existing project. The authorized project provides for development of the Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, and Flint Rivers for navigation, flood control, hydropower, and recreation. Navigation features of the existing project consist of a continuous 9-foot by 100-foot channel in the Apalachicola River from the intersection of the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway to the confluence of 10-22 MOBILE, ALA., DISTRICT the Chattahoochee and Flint Rivers, 104 miles, thence to Columbus, Georgia, on the Chattahoochee River, 164 miles, and to Bainbridge, Georgia, on the Flint River, 29 miles, and a 3-foot by 100-foot channel on the Flint River from Bainbridge to Albany, Georgia, 74 miles, thence a channel suitable for light draft vessels at moderate stage to Montezuma, Georgia, 79 miles, to be accomplished by dredging, contraction works, and construction of three locks and dams (Jim Woodruff, George W. Andrews, and Walter F. George) along the 9-foot depth channel, two multipurpose dams (West Point and Buford) on the Chattahoochee River, three multipurpose dams (Lower Auchumpkee Creek, Lazer Creek, and Spewrell Bluff) on the Flint River, and minor improvements of certain streams tributary to the Apalachicola River, including a nine by 100-foot side channel, approximately 2,000 feet long, from Apalachicola River to Apalachicola River Industrial Park at Blountstown, Fla. Plane of reference is mean low water. Hydropower and flood control storage is provided at Sidney Lanier, Walter F. George, and West Point, and hydropower is provided at Jim Woodruff. The authorized but unconstructed projects of Lazer Creek, Lower Auchumpkee Creek and Spewrell Bluff would have storage for hydropower and flood control. For further details see Annual Report for 1962. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Mean range of tide at the mouth of Apalachicola River is 1.6 feet. At the point wher'e the river is formed the variation between low and high water is about 37 feet. On the Chattahoochee River, variation between average low and high water'is about 20 feet, and extreme fluctuation is 65.3 feet at Eufaula. On the Flint River the extreme fluctuation of stage due to flood is 40 feet, while average variation between low and high water is about 21.5 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. About 200 feet of public docks, in addition to private wharves, are available at Apalachicola, Florida. There are numerous constructed and natural landings along the entire system for launching small craft. For details of other terminal facilities, which are considered adequate for existing commerce, see individual project descriptions. See also Table 10- M on locks and dams and multiple-purpose development included in existing project. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: A modification to the project consisting of about 2,000 feet of dredging from the Apalachicola River to Apalachicola River Industrial Park cost $212,081. (See report for individual project cost.) Maintenance: The contractor's dredge, Hendry #6, removed 722,725 cubic yards of material from Apalachicola River at a cost of $1,706,874. The dredge, Little Rock, operating on the Chattahoochee River, removed 159,102 cubic yards of material at a cost of $545,130. The U. S. Snagboat, Montgomery, removed 5,146 obstructions for a cost of $1,031,481. Other costs included: condition and operation studies, $836,467; water control management, $127,947; permanent operating equipment, $42,309; buildings, grounds and utilities, $10,943; and $403,541 for engineering, design, supervision and administration and other costs. Operation of George W. Andrews Lock and Dam cost $269,053 and reservoir operations amounted to $210,681. Operations and maintenance locks and dams: Buford Dam cost $4,560,430; im Woodruff Lock and Dam, $3,210,277; Walter F. George Lock and Dam, $4,445,259; and West Point Lake, $2,596,982. Total FY 1981 cost for entire project was $21,626,147, of which $1,471,173 was for new work and $20,154,974 was for operation and maintenance. Detailed information on operations and costs applicable to the individual dam projects is presented under their respective project titles elsewhere in this report. Condition at end of fiscal year. Improvement of Apalachicola River channel by dredging to provide project dimensions throughout is complete. All major construction on Lake Sidney Lanier Dam, George W. Andrews Lock and Dam, Jim Woodruff Lock and Dam, and Walter F. George Lock and Dam, is complete. West Point is essentially complete with the exception of adding recreation facilities. Channel rectification in Apalachicola River was completed December 1970. More detailed information concerning condition at the end of fiscal year for individual locks and dams and multiple-purpose developments comprising the system is presented under their respective project titles elsewhere in this report. Work remaining to complete the project consists of completion of recreational facilities at Lake Sidney Lanier, George W. Andrews Lock and Dam, Jim Woodruff Lock and Dam, and Walter F. George Lock and Dam; design and construction of Lazer Creek, Spewrell Bluff and Lower Auchumpkee Creek Dam; and completion of construction of West Point Dam. (See Tables 10-A and 10-M for fiscal year costs and summaries of overall project.) 44A.BUFORD DAM, GA. Location. Buford Dam is on the Chattahoochee River about 348.9 miles above its mouth, 50 miles above Atlanta and five miles northwest of Buford, Georgia. The reservoir, Lake Sidney Lanier, extends about 47 miles upstream along the Chattahoochee River, and about 21 miles up the 10-23 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 Chestatee River, which enters the Chattahoochee River 14.5 miles above the dam. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a rolled-earth dam 1,630 feet long with crest at elevation 1,106 feet national geodetic datum, or about 192 feet above streambed elevation; three earth saddle dikes with a total length of 5,406 feet; a chute spillway with crest at elevation 1,085; a powerhouse in a deep cut with steel penstocks in tunnels, and concrete intake structure at the upstream end of the tunnels; and a flood control sluice tunnel paralleling the power funnels. The Lake Sidney Lanier reservoir has a gross capacity of 2,554,000 acre-feet of which 637,000 acre-feet of storage is reserved for flood control storage. The power installations consist of one generating unit of 6,000 kilowatts and two units of 40,000 kilowatts each, or a total of 86,000 kilowatts. The project provides for maintenance, including operation and care. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Construction of recreational facilities at the completed project cost $452,439, including engineering, design, supervision, and administration. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance cost $4,560,430. Gross power generation amounted to 120,394,000 kilowatt-hours during FY 1981, of which 118,762,000 were delivered to Southeastern Power Administration. Recreational attendance at Lake Sidney Lanier during CY 1980 totaled 16,559,000 recreational user days. Flood control benefits attributed to the project for FY 1981 were negligible. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction commenced in March 1950 and was completed in June 1960. The reservoir was in useful operation for flood control in February 1956. The first power generating unit was placed on the line June 19, 1957; the second on July 26, 1957; and the third on October 10, 1957. The project is essentially complete except for adding additional recreational facilities. 44B.GEORGE W. ANDREWS LOCK AND DAM, ALA. AND GA. Location. The project is on the Chattahoochee River about 46.5 miles above its mouth and about one mile below the town of Columbia, Alabama, near the head of Jim Woodruff Reservoir. (See Geological Survey maps for southeast Alabama.) The pool extends up the navigation channel about 28 miles upstream to Walter F. George Lock and Dam. Existing project. This single-purpose project provides for a concrete fixed-crest spillway 340 feet long extending into the right bank with a crest at elevation 102 feet national geodetic datum, a concrete gate spillway adjacent to the lock 280 feet long with crest at elevation 82 feet national geodetic datum, a single-lift lock with usable chamber dimensions of 82 feet by 450 feet, and a maximum lift of 25 feet. Depths are 13 feet over the lower sill and 19 feet over the upper sill at normal pool elevation. The underlying foundation is limestone. The project provides for maintenance including operation and care. The House Committee on Public Works, by resolution adopted May 19, 1953, approved the plan as proposed by the Chief of Engineers for a high dam at Walter F. George site and a low dam at the Fort Benning site and a high dam at the upper Columbia site, construction of which was authorized by the 1946 River and Harbor Act as the initiation and partial accomplishment of the plan for full development of the Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, and Flint River system. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must operate all movable span bridges, provide suitable public terminals, and hold the United States free from damages. These conditions are being complied with. Terminal facilities. At Columbia, Alabama, there is a public wharf with concrete deck for handling general cargo and a bulk petroleum terminal with an unloading dock. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Recreational attendance at George W. Andrews Lock and Dam during CY 1980 totaled 261,100 recreational user days. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance cost included under overall Apalachicola, Chattahoochee and Flint project. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the lock and dam began in March 1959 and was completed in November 1963. Work remaining consists of construction of recreational facilities. 44C.JIM WOODRUFF LOCK AND DAM, GA. AND FLA. Location. The project is located on the Apalachicola River 107.6 miles above its mouth, about 1,000 feet below confluence of the Chattahoochee and Flint Rivers, and 1.5 miles northwest of Chattahoochee, Florida. Reservoir extends about 46.5 miles upstream along the Chattahoochee River to the vicinity of Columbia, Alabama, and about 47 miles upstream along Flint River, or 17 miles above Bainbridge, Georgia. (See Geological Survey maps for southwest Georgia.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a concrete open-crest spillway 1,634 10-24 MOBILE, ALA., DISTRICT feet long on the right bank, with a crest at elevation 79 feet national geodetic datum; a single-lift lock with usable chamber dimensions of 82 by 450 feet, a maximum lift of 33 feet, and depth over the sills of 14 feet; a gated spillway 766 feet long with the bridge at elevation 107 feet national geodetic datum, or about 67 feet above the streambed elevation; a powerhouse with an intake section constituting a portion of the dam; an earth section 506 feet long to accommodate the switchyard and substation; and an overflow dike section 2,130 feet long on the left bank, with a crest at elevation 85. The underlying foundation is limestone. At the normal pool elevation of 77, the reservoir has a total capacity of 406,160 acre-feet. The power installation consists of three units of 10,000 kilowatts each, or a total of 30,000 kilowatts. Project provides for maintenance, including operation and care. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Required cooperation is being fulfilled. Easements for rights-of-way and spoil-disposal areas were provided as required along the Apalachicola River. Adequate public terminals were constructed by local interests at Bainbridge, Georgia, on the Flint River; and at Columbia, Alabama, on the Chattahoochee River. Facilities are being planned for other localities on the project. Terminal facilities. A public wharf with concrete deck for handling general cargo, a bulk storage terminal for petroleum, a grain elevator, and private riverside facilities at Bainbridge, Georgia, on the Flint River, are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Recreational facilities provided at completed project amounted to $48,661. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance cost $3,210,277. Gross power generation amounted to 191,581,000 kilowatt-hours during FY 1981, of which 189,998,000 were delivered to Southeastern Power Administration. Recreational attendance at Lake Seminole during CY 1980 totaled 3,889,500 recreational user days. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the lock was commenced in 1947, and completed in 1957. The lock was opened to navigation in May 1954, and the pool was raised to project level in January 1957. The first power-generating unit was placed on-the-line on February 1, the second on March 1, and the third on April 26, 1957. 44D.SPEWRELL BLUFF LAKE, GA. Location. The dam is on the Flint River in Talbot and Upson Counties, Georgia, about rine miles west of Thomaston. The lake will extend into Meriwether, Pike, and Spalding Counties. Existing project. The authorized project provides for: a dam 2,475 feet long with maximum height of 211.0 feet, a 326-foot long gated spillway with six tainter gates 38 feet high and 45 feet wide, concrete non-overflow abutments 1,149 feet across the main channel including 268 feet for the power intake, with an earth-rock fill dike 580 feet long to high ground on the left bank, a 420-foot saddle dike on the left bank, and a power plant with three 50,000-kw units located in the left bank. The reservoir would have an area of 13,330 acres at maximum power pool elevation of 695 national geodetic datum. Usable storage of 241,510 acre-feet would be provided for power generation between elevations 665 and 695 and 195,010 acre-feet would be reserved between elevations 695 and 706.5 for flood storage. Approved estimated (1981) cost is $360,000,000, of which $254,750,000 is for construction and design, and $105,250,000 for lands, damages, and relocations. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interest must maintain and operate all utility and highway facilities which may be relocated or otherwise altered as part of the improvement, provide suitable public terminal facilities, and hold the United States free from damages. Local agencies and organizations have indicated their willingness and ability to comply. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Lands and damages cost $177. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction has not been initiated. 44E.WALTER F. GEORGE LOCK AND DAM, ALA. AND GA. Location. The project is on the Chattahoochee- River about 75.2 miles above its mouth and about 1.5 miles above Fort Gaines, Georgia. (See Geological Survey maps for southwest Georgia.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a concrete dam, gated spillway, and single-lift lock, with earth embankments at either side. The non-overflow section of the dam includes a powerhouse and an intake structure. The gated spillway is 708 feet long with a fixed crest at elevation 163 feet national geodetic datum. The two earth embankments, of almost equal lengths, have a total length of 12,128 feet, with a crest elevation at 215, and a maximum height of about 68 feet. The non-overflow section of the concrete dam is 200 feet long, with the deck of the powerhouse section at elevation 208. The lock, with usable chamber dimensions of 82 feet by 450 feet, has a lift of 88 feet with the normal upper pool elevation at 190. Depths are 13 feet over 10-25 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 the lower sill and 18 feet over the upper sill at normal pool elevation. The underlying foundation is limestone. Total reservoir capacity is 934,400 acre-feet, with 244,400 acre-feet reserved for power. The power installation consists of four units of 32,500 kilowatts each, or a total of 130,000 kilowatts. The project provides for maintenance, including operation and care. The approved (1981) cost of rehabilitation work to control seepage is estimated to be $27,275,000. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must maintain and operate all utility and highway facilities which may be relocated or otherwise altered as part of the improvement, provide suitable public terminal facilities, and hold the United States free from damages. Local agencies and other organizations have indicated their willingness and ability to comply. Terminal facilities. Public wharves at Eufaula and Phenix City, Alabama, and Columbus, Georgia, are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Recreation facilities cost $216,672. Maintenance of the project for operation and care was $4,445,259. Gross power generation amounted to 276,630,000 during FY 1981, of which 274,909,000 were delivered to Southeastern Power Administration. Recreational attendance during CY 1980 totaled 4,738,100 recreational user days. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was completed in 1963. The lock was opened to navigation in June 1963. The first power generating unit was placed on-the-line in March, the second in May, the third in September, and the fourth in November 1963. 44F.WEST POINT LAKE, CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVER BASIN, GA. AND ALA. Location. The damsite is on the Chattahoochee River 2.8 miles upstream from West Point, Georgia, 201.4 miles above the mouth of the Chattahoochee River, and 309.2 miles above the mouth of the Apalachicola River. At the full power pool elevation of 635 feet above national geodetic datum, the reservoir would lie in Troup and Heard Counties, Georgia, and in Chambers and Randolph Counties, Alabama (See Geological Survey maps of Georgia and Alabama.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for flood control, power, recreation, fish and wildlife development, and streamflow regulation for downstream navigation. The project provides for a gravity-type concrete dam 896 feet long with earth embankments at either end 1,111 feet long on the east end and 5,243 feet long on the west end. The total length of the dam and spillway is 7,250 feet. The main dam consists of a concrete non-overflow section, 185 feet long on the west side and an earth embankment retaining wall on the east side; a gravity concrete spillway 390 feet long, including piers and abutments, with six tainter gates, each 50 feet by 41 feet. A monolith intake-powerhouse section and erection bay 321 feet long is constructed directly west and adjacent to the spillway. At the full power-pool elevation of 635 the reservoir provides a total storage of 605,000 acre-feet of which 307,000 acre-feet is usable. During the critical flood season the reservoir is operated with maximum power pool elevation at 625 feet to provide flood storage between elevations 625 and 635. The initial power installation of 73,375 kilowatts consisting of units 1, 2 and 3 which were placed in operation in March and April, 1975. The ultimate installation is 108,375 kilowatts. Approved estimated cost of new work (1981) is $132,500,000, of which $90,355,000 is for construction and design; $19,420,000 for lands and damages; and $22,725,000 for relocations. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: During fiscal year 1981 relocations, power plant construction, and work on recreation facilities continued. Total cost for new work amounted to $541,721 of which $469 was for real estate; $95,719 for relocations; $4,974 for power plant; $278,409 for recreation facilities; $71,365 for construction facilities; $121 for permanent operating equipment; $90,784 for engineering, design, supervision and administration. Maintenance: Operation and care of the project cost $2,596,982. Gross power generation amounted to 121,473,000 kilowatt-hours during FY 1981, of which 119,804,000 were delivered to Southeastern Power Administration. Recreational attendance during CY 1980 totaled 4,270,200 recreational user days. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project, which was initiated in June 1966, was about 98 percent complete at the end of the fiscal year. 45. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS Mobile District monitors flood control operations of Alabama Power Company's Weiss, H. Neely Henry, and Logan Martin Dams on Coosa River, Alabama, and their Lewis Smith Dam on Sipsey Fork (headwaters of Black Warrior River, Alabama), for compliance with regulation plans prepared in accordance with 10-26 MOBILE, ALA., DISTRICT Public Law 436, 83rd Congress, and Federal Power Commission licenses. Fiscal year cost of $11,523 for these activities on the Weiss, H. Neely Henry, and Logan Martin Dams are included under operation and maintenance costs for the Alabama-Coosa Rivers. Fiscal year cost for the Lewis Smith Dam is included under the overall operation and maintenance costs for the Black Warrior-Tombigbee Rivers System. General Investigations 46. SURVEYS Fiscal year cost was $4,866,838 of which $1,700,710 was for navigation studies, $1,655,030 for flood control studies, $9,229 for beach erosion studies; $1,153,924 for special studies; $789 for coordination with the Soil Conservation Service; $2,630 for water quality management; $946 for coastal zone management; $20,890 for planning assistance to states; $687 for technical assisstance on shore and streambank erosion; $322,003 for supplemental pre-authorization studies. 47. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Collection and study of basic data continued during the fiscal year with the completion of 11 Flood Insurance studies, the cost of which was reimbursable by HUD. In addition, Flood Plain Management were performed at a cost of $158,555. (See Table 10-N for listings of studies completed during FY 1980.) For listing of previous reports see page 10-50 Annual Report for 1974, page 10-44 of FY 1975 Annual Report, page 10-46 of FY 1977 Annual Report, and page 10-48 of FY 1978 Annual Report. The National Program for inspection of non- Federal dams cost $337,439. 10-27 TABLE 10-A REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project 1. Apalachicola Bay Fla. 2. Aquatic Plant Control (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 3. Bayou Coden, Ala. (Contributed Funds) 4. Bayou La Batre, Ala. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 5. Biloxi Harbor, Miss. (Contributed Funds) 6. Black Warrior & Tombigbee Rivers, Ala. 7. Blackwater River, Fla. 8. Bon Secour River, Ala. (Contributed Funds) 9. Cadet Bayou, Miss. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) Funding New Work: Approp. Copt Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost FY78 FY79 FY80 FY81 Sept. 30, 1981 -24,000 21,992 16,000 5,864 6,121 3,966 56,800 53,698 17,000 18,295 11,832 12,899 -335 594,400 548,160 -13,000 14,298 -27,634 -5,036 546 546 - 2,033,4611 - 2,033,461 26,000 2,281,8072 7,436 2,259,470 17,000 403,287 14,217 386,504 - 21,225 - 21,225 - 330,7013 - 330,701 13,000 70,378 8,088 64,378 - 100,000 - 100,000 - 311,095 - 311,095 2,000 1,142,386 12,690 1,137,992 - 10,5004 - 10,500 - 1,215,4366 - 1,215,436 987,577 4,887,1066 994,121 4,877,442 - 102,600 - 102,600 84,171 153,546,7377 124,729 153,382,889 13,014,800 115,195,1238 13,113,823 114,716,562 41,6509 - 41,650 5,813 260,538 6,497 260,538 - 118,615 - 118,615 28,048 106,478 18,796 97,226 - 6,700 - 6,700 - 87,921 - 87,921 21,000 511,017 6,400 496,407 - 31,000 - 31,000 '309 231,837 228,026 228,430 227,240 859,900 126,597 5,835,000 5,739,467 4,664 4,664 5,489 5,166 35,727 123,839 45,000 41,577 146,000 35,433 877,441 861,328 197,000 755,719 10,716,400 9,652,581 3,006 282 13,400 6,456 115,281 225,848 247,000 250,984 24,000 24,000 -11,000 549,453 11,426,000 12,149,695 4,763 6,803 6,075 6,754 1,712 3,898 1,700 2,108 10-28 MOBILE, ALA., DISTRICT TABLE 10-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Project 10. Dauphin Island Bay, Ala. 11. Dog and Fowl Rivers, Ala. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 12. East Pass Channel From Gulf of Mexico into Choctawhatchee Bay, Fla. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 13. East Pearl River, Miss. 14. Escambia-Conecuh Rivers, Fla. and Ala. 15. Fly Creek, Ala. 16. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway between Apalachee Bay, Fla. and Mexican Border 17. Gulfport Harbor, Miss. 18. Mobile Harbor, Ala. (Contributed Funds) (Regular Funds) Funding New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Total Cost to FY78 FY79 FY80 FY81 Sept. 30, 1981 - - - - 292.864 53,646 29,535 30,152 39,688 7,433 111,254 3,201 114,632 379,100 409,174 1,534 14,692 9,929 85,409 19,089 231,018 244,234 256,800 257,593 60,000 56,245 12,000 2,914 292,864 928,026 922,538 190,965 190,965 680,593 671,427 114,100 114,100 916,715 916,715 17,000 576,000 363,000 3,509,160 24,291 569,269 362,586 3,501,045 - - - 398,000 - - - 398,000 - - - 37,12810 - - - 37,128 - 5,954 8,774 471,438 51 6,002 8,824 471,438 - - - 208,49911 - - - 208,499 16,550 628,163 10,752 1,083,15012 21,120 628,119 10,989 1,083,150 - - - 29,000 - - - 29,000 30,242 -3,000 263 198,621 92,079 59 1,687 198,621 - - - 6,480,2991 - - - 6,480,299 1,991,000 1,656,100 3,040,200 1,698,460 1,913,733 3,002,607 - - - 142,600 1,280,000 143,629 1,259,169 250,000 5,700,000 415,398 5,085,558 - 517,500 - 459,860 4,280,493 2,018,000 4,225,031 1,999,508 1,707,000 1,734,630 22,700,000 21,967,612 1,050,000 1,037,345 10,228,000 8,521,963 1,268,000 28,989,72214 1,320,430 28,927,412 - 904,77515 - 904,775 2,981,000 24,084,50816 2,651,941 23,748,015 17 23,600,000 67,788,93717 23,730,997 66,483,004 1,150,000 2,717,500 1,161,761 2,658,966 2,053,000 55,079,48318 3,088,041 54,315,476 10-29 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 10-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Project 19. Panama City Harbor, Fla. (Contributed Funds) 20. Pascagoula Harbor, Miss. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 21. Pearl River, Miss. and La. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 22. Pensacola Harbor, Fla. 23. Perdido Pass Channel, Ala. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 24. Port St. Joe Harbor, Fla. (Contributing Funds) (Regular Funds) 25. Removing Water Hyacinths (Mobile District) 26. Waterway Connecting Tombigbee and Tennessee Rivers, Ala. and Miss. Funding New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. 1 Cost 1 Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Aprop. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Const. Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. 8( Cost 7 Maint: Approp. Cost Total Cost to FY78 FY79 FY80 FY81 Sept. 30,1981 11 315,000 424,000 2,477,000 3,228,000 283,667 410,092 2,183,192 3,368,455 6,678,3312 6,479,737 10-30 -25,900 - - - 1,638,04519 389 - - - 1,638,045 -8,525 48,071 30,577 118,717 3,959,3342 -8,843 44,704 34,518 110,334 3,950,094 - - - - 80,000 - - - - 80,000 - - - - 6,572,98521 - - - - 6,572,985 ,176,412 1,141,000 4,268,500 2,186,000 21,448,246, ,277,620 1,173,849 4,246,186 1,451,652 20,690,019 63,250 - 191,000 25,000 469,350 37,950 20,500 175,000 - 423,550 --.-.. - - - 88,,556622,,990088m 24 141,500 193,000 135,900 237,000 4,704,505, 133,628 197,459 142,019 217,432 4,682,621 - - - - 65,000 - - - - 65,000 - - - - 1,469,69325 - - - - 1,469,693 174,292 41,184 51,200 338,268 3,991,28126 170,485 43,107 53,248 315,114 3,967,081 - - - - 629,860 - - - - 629,860 36,500 287,000 261,800 192,000 3,316,217 26,547 285,809 159,447 300,028 3,309,289 - - - - 510,000 - - - - 510,000 - - - - 10,325 - - - - 10,325 - - - - 1,960,862 - - - - 1,960,862 - - - - 20,000 - - - - 20,000 4,652 44,670 672,794 53,994 2,161,837 4,652 44,473 664,732 51,795 2,151,380 55,000 21,000 21,800 7,000 1,105,471 41,559 37,284 22,859 972 1,099,226 ,245,000 80,321,000 124,348,000 108,185,000 599,251,200. ,785,795 86,293,989 112,719,590 117,448,766 594,634,584 03 MOBILE, ALA., DISTRICT TABLE 10-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Okatibbee Lake, Miss. 33. Tallahala Creek Lake, Pascagoula River, Miss. 34. Edinburg Lake, Miss. 35. Gordon's Creek, Miss. 36. Houlka Creek, Miss. 37. Tombigbee River, Miss. and Ala. 38. Tombigbee River Tributaries Miss. and Ala. (Regular Funds) Contributed Funds) 42. Alabama-Coosa Rivers, Ala. and Ga. 42A. Carters Dam and Reservoir, Ga. 42B. Claiborne Lock and Dam, Ala. 42C. Jones Bluff Lock and Dam, Ala. 42D. Millers Ferry Lock and Dam, Ala. 42E. Coosa River, Montgomery to Gadsden, Ala. 43. Allatoona Lake, Coosa River Basin, Ga. 32. Funding FY78 FY79 FY80 FY81 Sept. 30, 1981 New Work: Approp. - - Cost - - Maint: Approp. 512,400 484,000 Cost 500,088 513,940 New Work: Approp. 1,450,000 -1,186,000 Cost 492,180 191,957 New Work: Approp. - - Cost 7,883 11,363 New Work: Approp. 47,244 575,000 Cost 49,210 480,281 New Work: Approp. 20,000 34,000 Cost 58,352 35,500 New Work: Approp. - - Cost - - Maint: Approp. 25,000 -1,000 Cost 22,642 839 New Work: Approp. - - Cost 644,151 394,648 New Work: Contrib. - - Cost - 1,052 New Work: Approp. 5,902,300 2,525,000 Cost 1,716,089 5,731,313 Maint: Approp. 8,627,900 8,020,000 Cost 8,371,155 8,369,084 New Work: Approp. 2,250,000 - Cost 489,991 1,126,304 Maint: Approp. 2,328,400 1,636,000 Cost 2,248,555 1,881,118 New Work: Approp. - - Cost - - New Work: Approp. 3,200,000 -675,000 Cost 957,294 1,844,048 Maint: Approp. 1,140,000 1,054,000 Cost 1,110,772 1,124,435 New Work: Approp. 20,000 Cost 3,482 1,625 Maint: Approp. 2,036,300 2,278,000 Cost 1,987,063 2,265,592 New Work: Approp. 500,000 3,200,000 Cost 262,967 2,759,336 New Work: Approp. 831,000 -358,000 Cost 157,218 416,831 Maint: Approp. 2,565,300 3,245,000 Cost 2,587;913 3,271,631 - - 80,700 - - 49,752 3,835,000 12,190,000 306,524,7089 5,939,040 10,209,325 302,970,507 7,872,700 10,003,100 58,658,974 7,737,239 9,565,378 57,692,289 -1,100,000 1,050,000 111,330,340 150,720 1,201,528 111,059,026 1,462,800 1,860,600 9,940,800 1,485,797 1,735,269 9,730,151 - - 27,997,450 - - 27,997,450 2,799,000 1,900,000 80,587,800 3,533,201 2,127,375 80,240,763 1,390,800 1,835,000 7,798,778 1,319,160 1,828,692 7,663,155 -14,000 40,000 62,720,778 3,160 18,130 62,698,378 1,866,300 2,453,000 15,662,485 1,903,222 2,024,013 15,135,052 2,150,000 9,200,000 15,050,000 2,251,959 6,862,288 12,136,550 164,700 582,931 34,473,08531 149,422 175,420 33,961,311 3,220,800 4,006,000 29,775,043 3,231,770 3,881,048 29,538,587 10-31 65,000 9,085,628 31,020 9,048,648 602,000 4,062,892 570,387 3,997,881 190,000 3,945,757 147,694 3,759,013 - 573,000 2,105 573,000 -15,000 775,623 10,836 773,255 - 250,000 723 238,219 - 134,801 - 134,801 -40,000 1,234,100 67,321 1,219,023 2,350,000 10,614,225 649,352 8,488,107 3,000 546,800 522,072 -190,000 51,263 6,096 79,594 121,036 150,000 28,121 450,000 295,201 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 10-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY78 FY79 FY80 FY81 Sept. 30, 1981 44. Apalachicola, C hattahoochee, and Flint Rivers, Ala. and Ga. 44A. Lake iciney Lanier, Ga. 44B. George W. Andrews Lock and Dam, Ala. and Ga. 44C. Jim Woodruff Lock and Dam, Ga. and Fla. 44D. Sprewell Bluff Lake, Ga. 44E. Walter F. George Lock and Dam, Ala. and Ga. 44F. West Point Lake, Chattahoochee River Basin, Ga. and Ala. New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost 5,828,000 6,323,085 32 3,473,000 2,922,000 1,677,899 340,754,69332 3,555,113 3,598,176 1,471,173 339,468,380 17,024,500 17,048,000 16,231,700 20,918,300 158,813,40433 16,371,061 15,839,945 17,203,131 20,154,974 156,447,186 242,000 877,000 462,805 468,186 4,092,400 4,429,000 3,942,929 4,182,496 2,208,000 2,458,356 3,441,800 4,013,988 337,000 452,439 4,95 4,56 36 36 25,000 55,000 171,950 87,795 2,945,700 3,347,000 2,988,662 2,838,434 61,000 85,000 59,738 98,781 2,246,000 2,538,000 2,217,879 2,337,818 5,500,000 2,456,000 5,628,594 2,900,352 1,844,400 2,716,000 1,938,504 2,224,328 12,000 -13,246 3,152,400 3,320,360 -7,000 7,563 2,906,300 3,006,667 659,000 1,095,949 1,887,700 2,332,469 33 54 52,486,75634 51,878,019 i6,000 33,313,927 i0,430 32,866,705 - 13,038,42735s - 13,038,427ss 36 36 37 81,348 48.023,35837 48,661 47,914,007 ,099,000 31,444,081 ,210,277 31,083,393 - 2,169,600 177 2,158,652 532,551 87,714,088, 216,672 87,362,412 ,407,700 34,299,084 ,445,259 33,125,985 500,000 129,846,411 541,721 129,654,353 2,620,000 11,714,800 2,596,982 11,585,183 1. Includes $134,613 for previous projects and $28,500 for DPR on Two-Mile. 2. Includes $168,766 for previous projects. 3. Includes $5,650 for previous projects. 4. Cost for providing spoil dikes for work authorized by 1965 River and Harbor Act. 5. Includes $44,382 for previous projects of which $5,000 was contributed funds. 6. Includes $96,509 for previous projects of which $10,200 was contributed funds. 7. Includes $606,931 for previous projects and $599,078 for recreational facilities on completed projects. 8. Includes $50,000 for previous projects. 9. Includes $5,000 for previous projects. 10. Includes $28,200 for previous projects. 11. Includes $71,175 for previous projects. 12. Includes $110,700 for previous projects. 13. Includes $45,605 for previous projects. 14. Includes $65,137 for previous projects. 15. Includes $269,017 for previous projects. 16. Includes $2,312,297 for previous projects and $442,836 Special O and M funds. 17. Includes $6,683,104 for previous projects, $14 000 Public Work funds, and $41,242 Emergency Relief funds. 18. Includes $4,096,681 for previous projects and $494,136 Special () and M funds. 19. Includes $203()560 for previous projects. $581,959 Public Works funds, $457,467 rehabilitation of jetties under existing project and $48,001 for (rand Lagoon modification. 20. Includes $513,604 for previous projects. 21. Includes $904,442 for previous projects. 22. Includes $412,624 for previous projects, $124,565 Special O and M funds, and $829,472 Emergency Work Funds. 23. Includes $144,443 for previous projects and $143,971 for recreation facilities on completed projects. 24. Includes $168,172 for previous projects, and, exclusive of rehabilitation costs of $1,957,809 due to April 1979 flood. 25. Includes $594,688 for previous projects. 26. Includes $126,649 for previous projects. 27. Includes $2,100,000 transferred to National Park Servic; $210,249 GI funds expended during FY 1957 thru FY 1961. Previous project cost amounted to $197,651. 28. Includes $234,331 for previous projects. 29. Includes $3,692,483 for previous projects. 30. Includes $2,978,050 for previous projects. 31. Includes $2,436,573 for recreational facilities. 32. Includes $1,883,193 Federal funds and $1,924 contributed funds for previous projects; $10,126,181 funds for recreational facilities at completed projects; $7,082,925 for Lake Sidney Lanier, $1,451,580 for Jim Woodruff, $84,014 for George W. Andrews, and $1,507,662 for Walter F. George. 33. Includes $2,246,233 for previous projects. 34. Includes $7,082,925 for recreational facilities. 35. Includes $84,014 for recreational facilities. 36. Included under maintenance for overall Apalachicola, Chattahoochee and Flint Rivers project. 37. Includes $1,451,580 for recreational facilities. 38. Includes $1,507,662 for recreational facilities. 10-32 -- MOBILE, ALA., DISTRICT TABLE 10-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 2, 1907 .Jan. 21, 1927 Sept. 3, 1954 Sept. 3, 1954 July 3, 1958 Nov. 21, 1963 Feb. 5, 19751 APALACHICOLA BAY, FLA. (See Section 1 of Text) Channel 18 feet deep through West Pass and Link Channels, 10 feet deep across the inner bar, and 9 feet deep through Bulkhead Shoals. Modify project to provide for channel 10 feet deep from mouth of inner bar channel to Gulf via Link and West Pass Channels, and 10-foot depth in Bulkhead Shoals Channel At Eastpoint, Fla., a channel 6 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and about 6,000 feet long, parallel to shore, with connecting channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide to St. George Sound, and at Apalachicola, Fla., a small-boat basin 200 feet and 9 feet deep, with a connecting channel 9 feet deep and 80 feet wide through Scipio Creek to the Apalachicola River. Modify project to provide for a channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide from the 10-foot depth in Apalachicola Bay across St. George Island to within 300 feet of the Gulf shore, thence increasing uniformly in width to 200 feet at shore and continuing at this width to the 10-foot depth in the Gulf with two jetties extending from the dune line on St. George Island to the outer end of channel, and for abandonment of West Pass Channel upon completion of channel through St. George Island. Modify improvement of Apalachicola Bay, Fla., authorized by River and Harbor Act of Sept. 3, 1954 to provide that the Secretary of the Army shall reimburse local interests for such approved work as they may have done based upon the reduction in the amount of material which will have to be removed to provide project dimensions at such time as Federal dredging of the channels is undertaken. A channel 6 feet deep, 100 feet wide and about 1 mile long, parallel to shore at Two Mile, Fla., with a 6-by 100-foot connecting channel to water of the same depth in Apalachicola Bay. A channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide extending from the eastern end of the existing Two Mile channel and generally paralleling the shoreline for a distance of about 9,000 feet to intersect with the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway about 1,650 feet south of Gorrie Bridge at Apalachicola, and a breakwater built to elevation 4.0 feet above mean low water along the seaward side of the existing channel parallel to the shore at Two Mile. The total length of the breakwater would be about 6,150 including two 860-foot legs paralleling the existing entrance channel. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (See Section 2 of Text) Aquatic plant control for N.C., S.C., Ga., Fla., Ala., Miss., and La. Research and planning costs to be borne by U.S. Provided for continued research. BAYOU CODEN, ALA. (See Section 3 of Text) Channel 4 by 40 feet. Channel 8 by 60 feet to connect with Bayou La Batre channel BAYOU LA BATRE, ALA. (See Section 4 of Text) A 12- by 100-foot channel from that depth in Mississippi Sound to a point about 2,800 feet south of the highway bridge, thence a channel 12 by 75 feet to the bridge, an overall distance of about 33,500 feet. BILOXI HARBOR, MISS. (See Section 5 of Text) Channel 10 feet deep and 150 feet wide from Mississippi Sound west and north of Deer Island to deep water in Back Bay of Biloxi. H. Doc. 37, 85th Cong., 1st Sess. Public Law 87-874 87th Cong. H. Doc. 251, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 824, 77th Cong., 2d Sess. DPR (Sec. 107) H. Doc. 327, 88th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 754, 69th Cong., 2d Sess. 10-33 H. Doc. 422, 59th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 106, 69th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 156, 82d Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 557, 82d Cong., 2d Sess. DPR (Sec. 107) DPR (Sec. 107) July 3, 1958 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 27, 1965 Mar. 2, 1945 June 2, 19691 Oct. 27, 1965 July 3, 1930 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 10-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized . Documents June 20, 1938 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 May 17, 1950 July 14, 1960 Nov. 7, 1966 Mar. 28, 19791 Relocation of channel. Entrance channel 6 feet deep and 50 feet wide into Old Fort Bayou Entrance channel 8 feet deep and 100 feet wide through Cranes Neck into Bayou Bernard. Maintain channel 6 feet deep and 40 feet wide from Biloxi Harbor to Ott Bayou. Continuous channel 12 feet deep from Mississippi Sound the Air Force terminal on Bayou Bernard via Back Bay and Cranes Neck. A 23-mile-long through channel 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide from the GulfIntracoastal Waterway through: Mississippi Sound, Biloxi Bay (east of Deer Island), Back Bay, Big Lake, and via land cut to Gulfport Lake, including a 500- by 2 600-foot turning basin in the lake thence, a channel 12 by 00 feet from the western end of Gulfport Lake for about 2 miles to a 300- by 500-foot turning basin; adoption for maintenance of a 12- by 150- foot spur channel from the main channel in Biloxi Bay, westward about 1 mile to a 400- by 600-foot turning basin opposite Ott Bayou, and abandonment of the existing 6- by 40-foot channel into Ott Bayou; continuation of maintenance of the 12- by 150-foot lateral channel westward about 2.2 miles from the main channel in Biloxi Bay to a point opposite Oak Street; continuation of maintenance of the channel west of Deer Island. A channel 10 feet deep; 100 feet wide and 300 feet long extending northward from the Biloxi Lateral Channel, and, into a retangular basin approximately 300 feet by 370 feet. BLACK WARRIOR AND TOMBIGBEE RIVERS, ALA. (See Section 6 of Text) Original appropriation for improving Black Warrior River. Original project for slack-water improvement authorized by Secretary of War, Apr. 19, 1887. Construction of the first locks between Tuscaloosa and Demopolis. (Maintenance of the section of Tombigbee River below lock 1 to its mouth (66 miles) included in the existing project.) Construction of locks and dams 1, 2, and 3. Merging of the individual project for the Black Warrior and Warrior Rivers and the Tombigbee River below Demopolis. Construction of locks and dams 14, 15, 16, and 17. Provides for reconstruction of obsolete structures, modified in plan and location, to provide efficient and economical maintenance and operation. Lift of lock 17 changed to 63 feet and construction of locks and dams 18 and 19 eliminated from the project. Extension of slack-water improvement to Sanders Ferry on Mulberry Fork and Nichols Shoal on Locust Fork. Raising of various dams 2 feet and raising the lock walls 2 feet at lock 1 to provide a minimum depth of 8 feet at low water, widening the channel to 150 feet where practicable. For snagging Mobile River from the mouth of Chickasaw Creek to the junction of the Alabama and Tombigbee Rivers. Increase channel dimensions to 9 by 200 feet; construct crest gates at lock and dam 17; add flashboards at all dams; Sunflower Bend Cutoff. Construction of a lock and dam below Tuscaloosa to replace original locks and dams 10, 11, and 12. Annual Report, 1887, pt. 2, p. 1302. H. Doc. 178, 56th Cong., 2d Sess., and Annual Report, 1901, pt. 3, p. 1858. H. Doc. 165, 57th Cong., 1st Sess., and Annual Report, 1902, p. 1293. Public Law 317. H. Doc. 72, 62d Cong., 1st Sess. Annual Report, 1918, p. 876. H. Doc. 728, 71st Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 56, 73d Cong., 1st Sess., and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 45, 73d Cong. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 26, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. 10-34 H. Doc. 639, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 258, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 326, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 256, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 271, 86th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 513, 89th Cong., 2d Sess. DPR (Sec. 107) July 5, 1884 Mar. 3, 1899 Sept. 19, 1890 Sept. 19. 1890 Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 3, 1909 Aug. 22, 1911 Mar. 2, 1919 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 MOBILE, ALA., DISTRICT TABLE 10-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized June 26, 1934 Dec. 22, 1944 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 July 14, 1960 Mar. 3, 1905 May 16, 1963 May 20, 19691 Mar. 2, 1945 Sept. 3, 1954 May 19, 19691 July 3, 1930 Oct. 24, 1951 Oct. 27, 1965 July 25, 1910 July 3, 1958 Operation and care of locks and dams provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors. Recreation facilities. Construction of a lock and dam near Demopolis to replace existing dams 4, 5, 6, and. 7. Provide increased spillway capacity at dam 1. Coffeeville Lock and Dam Wildlife Refuge. BLACKWATER RIVER, FLA. (See Section 7 of Text) A 9- by 100-foot channel from mouth for 12 miles to Milton. BON SECOUR RIVER, ALA. (See Section 8 of Text) A 10- by 100-foot channel from Gulf Intracoastal Waterway through Bon Secour Bay to mouth of Bon Secour River and extending up river to vicinity of Swift's Landing, thence 6 by 80 feet up river to a point 600 feet above Oak Landing, with two turning and maneuvering areas 150 feet wide and 1,100 to 1,200 feet long opposite Swift's Landing and ice loading dock. Overall length of improvement is about 4.7 miles CADET BAYOU, MISS.(See Section 9 of Text) An 8- by 100-foot entrance channel extending from the 8-foot depth contour in Mississippi Sound to the mouth of the bayou, thence an 8- by 80-foot channel for a distance of about 1,900 feet into the bayou to a turning basin 8 feet deep, and a channel continuing therefrom 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide upstream for 8,750 feet with a second turning basin 6 feet deep located 900 feet downstream from the upper limit of the improvement. DAUPHIN ISLAND BAY, ALA. (See Section 10 of Text) A channel 7 feet deep and 150 feet wide from Mobile Bay to an anchorage basin of same depth, about 7 acres in area, in marsh just north of Fort Gaines on Dauphin Island; a channel 4 feet deep and 40 feet wide from anchorage basin to Dauphin Island Bay; and a jetty and revetment to protect entrance channel; and (b) an anchorage basin 7 feet deep and 500 feet square at Dauphin Island Village with an entrance channel of like depth, 100 feet wide and about 8,300 feet long, extending to 7-foot hydrographic contour in Mississippi Sound DOG AND FOWL RIVERS, ALA. (See Section 11 of Text) To provide small craft navigation on west side of Mobile Bay. EAST PASS CHANNEL FROM GULF OF MEXICO INTO CHOCTAWHATCHEE BAY, FLA. (See Section 12 of Text) Maintenance of 6-foot channel by 100-foot channel from Choctawhatchee Bay into Gulf. Maintenance of 12-foot channel from Choctawhatchee Bay into Gulf, and maintenance of 6-foot channel into Old Pass Lagoon. Construction of twin jetties. (Present project dimensions.) EAST PEARL RIVER, MISS. (See Section 13 of Text) A channel 9 feet deep, 200 feet wide and about 1.3 miles long at the mouth of East Pearl River, connecting the 9-foot contour in Lake Borgne with the same contour in East Pearl River. ESCAMBIA AND CONECUH RIVERS, FLA. AND ALA. (See Section 13 of Text) A 10- by 100-foot channel in Escambia Bay for 5.5 miles to mouth of Escambia River, thence up Escambia River to about mile 7, thence a channel 5 feet deep for 50 10-35 Acts I)ocuments H. Doc. 276, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 382, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 50, 86th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 193, 58th Cong., 2d Sess. DPR (Sec. 107) DPR (Sec. 107) H. Doc. 333, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 394, 82d Cong., 2d Sess. DPR (Sec. 107) H.Doc. 209, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 470, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 194, 88th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 328, 60th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 75, 85th Cong., 1st Sess. ___ REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 10-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents May 17, 1950 Aug. 26, 1937 June 25, 1910 Aug. 30, 1935 June 25, 1910 Aug. 30, 1935 July 3, 1930 July 3, 1930 July 3, 1930 July 23, 1942 June 17, 1943 Mar. 2, 1945 May 17, 1950 Nov. 7, 1966 miles to Florida State line, and thence improvement of Conecuh River to mouth of Patsaliga Creek, a distance of 80.5 miles. FLY CREEK, FAIRHOPE, ALA. (See Section 15 of Text) A channel 6 feet deep, 80 feet wide, and about 1,650 feet long from 6-foot depth in Mobile Bay to a turning basin of same depth, 100 feet wide and 350 feet long, in Fly Creek. GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN APALACHEE BAY, FLA., AND MEXICAN BORDER (Mobile District) (See Section 16 of Text) APALACHICOLA BAY TO ST. MARKS RIVER, FLA. A channel 9 feet and 100 feet wide at mean low water from Apalachicola Bay, Fla. via St. George Sound, Carrabelle, Crooked, and Ochlockonee Rivers and Ochlockonee and Apalachee Bays to St. Marks River, Fla. APALACHICOLA RIVER TO ST. ANDREW BAY, FLA. A channel 5 feet deep at mean low water and 65 feet wide at the bottom. A channel 9 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide at the bottom. CHOCTAWHATCHEE BAY TO WEST BAY, FLA. A channel 9 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide at the bottom. A channel 6 feet deep at mean low water, with no reference to width. CHOCTAWHATCHEE BAY TO PENSACOLA BAY, FLA. A channel 9 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide at the bottom. PENSACOLA BAY, FLA., TO MOBILE BAY, ALA. A channel 9 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide at the bottom. MOBILE BAY, ALA., TO NEW ORLEANS, LA. A channel 300 feet wide and 10 feet from the 10 foot contour in Mobile Bay to the 10-foot contour in Mississippi Sound. A channel 100 feet wide and 9 feet deep from Lake Pontchartrain to Mississippi Sound. APALACHEE BAY, FLA., TO NEW ORLEANS, LA. A channel 12 feet deep and 125 feet wide at mean low water, except in the section between Mobile, Ala., and New Orleans, La., where the width is to be 150 feet. Conditional acquisition of Gulf County Canal, Fla., and enlargement of the canal to 9 feet deep and 100 feet wide. Construction of a movable span in the Georgia, Florida & Alabama R.R. bridge crossing the Ochlockonee River Abandonment and closure of original channel between Big Lagoon and Pensacola Bay and construction of a new channel to enter the bay north of original entrance. Authorized enlargement of Gulf County Canal to 12 by 125 feet. H. Doc. 194, 81st Cong., 1st Sess, H. Doc. 291, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 670, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 52, 72d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 259, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 565, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 42, 73d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 42, 71st Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 4, 71st Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 341, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. Public Law 675, 77th Cong., 2d Sess., and H. Doc. 96, 79th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 257, 76th Cong., 1st Sess., and Public Law 75, 78th Cong. 1st Sess. H. Doc. 442, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 325, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. Public Law 89-789, 89th Cong.. 2d Sess. 10-36 MOBILE, ALA., DISTRICT TABLE 10-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 3, 1899 Mar. 2, 1907 Feb. 27, 1911 Jan. 21, 1927 July 23, 1930 June 30, 1948 July 3, 1958 Aug. 26 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Sept. 3, 1954 Sept. 3, 1954 July 26, 1970 (SR) Dec. 15, 1970 (HR) Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 June 30, 1948 GULFPORT HARBOR, MISS. (See Section 17 of Text) A channel 19 feet deep and 300 feet wide from the anchorage basin at Ship Island to Gulfport, Miss., and an anchorage basin next to the shore end 19 feet deep and not less than 2,640 feet by 1,320 feet in area. Combined Ship Island Pass with Gulfport Harbor project. Increased depth to 26 feet and width to 300 feet across Ship Island Bar and depth to 19 feet in channel from anchorage basin at Ship Island to anchorage basin at Gulfport. Authorized relocation of channel across Ship Island Bar. Increased depth to 27 feet and width to 300 feet across Ship Island Bar, 26 feet deep and 220 feet wide through Miss. Sound and depth of 26 feet in the anchorage basin at Gulfport. Increased depth of 32 feet and width to 300 feet across Ship Island Bar, 30 feet deep and 220 feet wide through Miss. Sound, and a depth of 30 feet in the anchorage basin at Gulfport. Maintenance of the existing commercial small-boat harbor and an approach channel 100 feet wide and 4,300 feet long, from deep water in Miss. Sound to the small-boat basin, all at a depth of 8 feet. MOBILE HARBOR, ALA. (See Section 18 of Text) For improvement of Threemile Creek by snagging from Mobile River to the Industrial Canal. Adoption of existing channel through Garrows Bend from Choctaw Point to Arlington pier, 27 feet deep and 150 feet wide, with 2 turning basins. Adoption of the existing channel alongside Arlington pier from the Mobile Bay Channel to turning basin at the inner end of Garrows Bend Channel, 27 feet deep and 150 feet wide. A channel 25 feet deep and generally 500 feet wide in Mobile River from the highway bridge to the mouth of Chickasaw Creek, then 25 feet deep and 250 feet wide in Chickasaw Creek to a point about 400 feet below Shell Bayou. Enlarging Mobile Bar Channel to 42 by 600 feet. Enlarging Mobile Bay Channel to 40 by 400 feet. Deepening Mobile River Channel below highway bridge to 40 feet over present widths, including existing turning basins and anchorage areas. Widening river channel opposite Magazine Point to provide a 40- by 800- by 1,400-foot turning basin. The turning basin was further modified for maintenance by SAD letter of 27 November 1973 under authority contained in ER-1130-2-307, to increase the turning basin's dimensions to 1000' x 1600'. Closure of Garrows Bend Channel by construction and operation of an earth-filled causeway across said channel (work to be done by local interests): To provide a channel 40 feet deep and 400 feet wide from the main ship channel in Mobile Bay and extending northwesterly for about 5.3 miles to the shore of Mobile Bay including an anchorage and turning basin near the shoreline, thence a land-cut 40 feet deep, 300 feet wide and about 1.9 miles long to and including a trapezoidal turning basin 40 feet deep and approximately 42 acres, 40 feet deep; a barge channel 12- by 100-feet extending 6500-feet and terminating in a 300-foot by 300-foot terminal basin. PANAMA CITY HARBOR, FLA. (See Section 19 of Text) Channels 27 and 29 feet deep. Abandonment of project adopted by act of June 25, 1910. Maintenance of a channel in Watson Bayou 100 feet wide and 10 feet deep from that depth in St. Andrew Bay to the highway bridge. Channels 32 and 34 feet deep. H. Doc. 120, 55th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 2, 60th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 692, 69th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 112, 81st Cong., S. Doc. 123, 84th Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 69, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 739, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 74, 83d Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 74, 83d Cong., 2d Sess. (Under provision of Section 201 of the 1965 Flood Control Act) H. Doc. 33, 73d Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 555, 76th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 559, 80th Cong., 2d Sess. 10-37 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 10-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Mar. 23, 19671 June 14, 1972 Mar. 4, 1913 Mar. 4, 1915 May 17, 1950 Sept. 3, 1954 July 3, 1958 July 14, 1960 July 14, 1967 Oct. 23, 1962 June 14, 1880 Apr. 21, 1900 Aug. 30, 1935 Nov. 7, 1966 June 13, 1902 Aug. 30, 1935 A channel 8 by 100 feet in Grand Lagoon from St. Andrew Bay to a point about 2,400 feet east of State Highway 392. Bridge with branches to serve shore facilities which terminate at the bridge. Channels 38, 40, 42 feet deep. PASCAGOULA HARBOR, MISS. (See Section 20 of Text) Provides for through channel from the Gulf to mile 4 on Dog River 25 by 300 feet through Horn Island Pass, thence 22 by 225 feet across Mississippi Sound and up Pascagoula River to the railroad bridge, thence 22 by 150 feet in Pascagoula River above bridge, and up Dog River to mile 4, all subject to financial participation by local interests. Waived requirement for financial participation by local interests Cutoff channel 12 by 125 feet, from State Highway 63 bridge to mile 4 on Dog River, via Robertson and Bounds Lakes. Modification to provide for channel dimensions of 35 by 325 feet through Horn Island Pass, thence 30 by 275 feet across Mississippi Sound and up Pascagoula River to the railroad bridge, and a turning basin just below the bridge. Reimbursement of local interests for work done on Dog River cutoff ($44,000). Modification to provide for maintenance of 12- by 125-foot channel to mile 6 on Dog River, and maintenance of 30- by 225-foot side channel from main ship channel in Mississippi Sound to the mouth of Bayou Casotte, thence 30 by 300 feet in Bayou Cassotte to a turning basin of the same depth 1 mile above the mouth. Deepening the Horn Island Pass channel to 38 feet and deepening the main ship channel in Mississippi Sound, the river channel to the railroad bridge, and the turning basin all to 33 feet. Enlarging Horn Island Pass Channel to 40 by 350 feet, provision of an impounding area adjacent to and east of channel 40 feet deep, 200 feet wide, and about 1,500 feet long, enlarging main channel in Mississippi Sound and river channel to railroad bridge to 38 by 350 feet, and deepening turning basin in river and Bayou Casotte channels and basin to 38 feet. PEARL RIVER, MISS. AND LA. (See Section 21 of Text) Provided for a 5-foot channel. Legalized construction of a fixed highway bridge at Rockport. A channel from the mouth of West Pearl River for 58 miles to the mouth of Bogalusa Creek at Bogalusa, La., 7 feet deep at low water with a bottom width of 100 feet in the river sections and 80 feet in the canal section; with locks 65 by 310 feet clear inside dimensions. Construction of cut-offs and easement of critical bends at eight locations below lock 1 with no increase in project depth. PENSACOLA HARBOR, FLA. (See Section 22 of Text) A channel 30 feet deep at mean low water and 500 feet wide from the Gulf of Mexico to the dock line at the east end of the city of Pensacola, and also provided that $150,000 may be used in constructing or purchasing a seagoing suction dredge. Modified the existing project for the present inner channels and the deepening of the entrance channel to 32 feet. DPR (Sec. 107) H. Doc. 196, 92d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 682, 62d Cong., 2d Sess. River and Harbor Committee Doc. 12, 63d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 188, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 98, 86th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 98, 86th Cong., 1st Sess. Chief of Engineers Report dated Nov. 3, 1960. H. Doc. 560, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 98, 45th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 145, 65th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 408, 75th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 482, 89th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 253, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. 10-38 Documents MOBILE, ALA., DISTRICT TABLE 10-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Aug. 26, 1937 Mar 2, 1945 Aug. 27, 1962 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 96, 74th Cong., 2d Sess. H. I)oc. 743, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 528, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. Improvement of Bayou Chico. Modified improvement of Bayou Chico, Fla. Maintenance of the entrance channel from the Gulf of Mexico to lower Pensacola Bay a distance of about 5 miles to dimensions of 35 feet deep and 500 feet wide; maintenance of a channel along the south side of the aircraft carrier mooring basin, a distance of about 2.5 miles, to dimensions of 33 feet deep and 300 feet wide; a bay channel 33 feet deep, 300 feet wide, and about 2.1 miles long; parallel approach channels to opposite ends of the inner-harbor channel, about 1.3 and 1.4 miles in length, each 33 feet deep, 300 feet wide, and flared at the junctions with the inner-harbor channel; and deepening the existing 500-foot wide inner-harbor channel to a depth of 33 feet and lengthening it to 3,950 feet. PERDIDO PASS CHANNEL, ALA. (Section 23 of Text) A 12- by 150-foot channel stabilized by twin rubblemound jetties, from the Gulf of Mexico into Perdido Pass, thence 9 by 100 feet into Perdido Bay with a spur channel of the same dimensions into Terry Cove. PORT ST. JOE, FLA. (See Section 24 of Text) A channel 24 feet deep and 300 feet wide across the bar at the entrance to the bay. An entrance channel 300 feet wide and 29 feet deep, and a bay channel 200 feet wide and 27 feet deep, with a turning basin at the proposed municipal pier at Port St. Joe. Adoption of south channel 27 feet deep and 200 feet wide from bay to turning basin, provision of a 32- by 300-foot entrance channel, a 32- by 200-foot north bay (inner) channel, and a 32- by 1,000-by 2,000-foot turning basin. Enlargement of the channel to provide for a depth of 37 feet and a width of 500 feet at the Gulf end, diminishing in width to 400 feet over a distance of 3.6 miles, thence 37 by 400 feet for a distance of 3.3 miles, thence 35 by 300 feet in St. Joseph Bay to the turning basin a distance of 7.1 miles, and a harbor channel in the basin 35 feet deep, 250 feet wide, and 2,000 feet long. REMOVING WATER HYACINTHS, MOBILE DISTRICT (See Section 25 of Text) Appropriations made for the States of Florida and Louisiana and provided for the extermination or removal of plants, the building of boats, and the establishment of booms. Appropriation made for Florida, provided that no chemical process injurious to cattle shall be used. And also made available for use in that State the operating plan pertaining to the work of Louisiana. Appropriation made available for the State of Alabama. WATERWAY CONNECTING TOMBIGBEE AND TENNESSEE RIVERS, ALA. AND MISS. (See Section 26 of Text) A waterway connecting Tennessee and Tombigbee Rivers via East Fork of Tombigbee River, Mackeys and Yellow Creeks. Plan of improvement consists of three sections: river section, 9- by 300-foot channel for 149 miles between Demopolis and Amory, Miss,; canal section, 12 by 300 feet for 46 miles from Amory to Bay Springs; divide section, 12 by 300 feet (except in the 27 mile-long divide cut in which bottom width would be 280 feet) for 39 miles from Bay Springs through dividing ridge to Tennessee. Total lift of 341 feet to be accomplished by 10 locks. Total length of project is 234 miles. 10-39 I)ocuments S. Doc. 94th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 660, 62d Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 10, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 17, 77th Cong., 1st Sess., and report of Chief of Engineers. H. Doc. 595, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 91, 55th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 486, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. Oct. 27, 1965 July 25, 1912 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Sept. 3, 1954 Mar. 3, 1899 Mar. 2, 1907 July 27, 1916 July 24, 1946 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 10-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Oct. 23, 1962 June 7, 1968 Mar. 7, 1974 2 Feb. 20, 19772 Mar. 1, 19773 Aug. 18, 1941 July 23, 1958 July 8, 1980 Mar. 2, 1945 June 28, 1954 Aug. 18, 1941 )Dec. 22, 1944 Mar. 2, 1945 ,July 24. 1946 Work Authorized OKATIBBEE LAKE, MISS. (See Section 32 of Text) Provides for a dam and reservoir for flood control, water supply, water quality control, and recreation. TALLAHALA CREEK LAKE, PASCAGOULA RIVER, MISS. (See Section 33 of Text) Provides for a dam and reservoir for flood control, water supply, water quality control, recreation, and fish and wildlife enhancement. EDINBURG LAKE, MISS. (See Section 34 of Text) Provides for a dam and reservoir for flood control, water quality control, general recreation, fish and wildlife enhancement, and area redevelopment. GORDON'S CREEK, HATTIESBURG, MISS. (See Section 35 of Text) Flood control improvements along Gordon's Creek consisting of channel enlargement by excavation to a bottom width of 40 feet for a distance of 6,489 feet, and, clearing and snagging of an additional 5,831 feet for a total project length of 12,320 feet. HOULKA CREEK, CHICKASAW AND CLAY COUNTIES, MISS. (See Section 36 of Text) Selective clearning and snagging between tops of banks of the lowermost 34.1 miles of Houlka Creek. Removal of snags and debris. TOMBIGBEE RIVER, MISS. AND ALA. (See Section 37 of Text) Provides for alleviation of floods from the Tombigbee River by clearing, snagging, and excavation of 13 cut-off channels, and other related channel improvements. TOMBIGBEE RIVER TRIBUTARIES, MISS. AND ALA. (See Section 38 of Text) Provides for improvement of 22 tributaries of Tombigbee River. Extends project limits on Twenty Mile Creek and eliminates local cooperation for this remedial work. MULTIPLE PURPOSE PROJECTS INCLUDING POWER ALABAMA-COOSA RIVERS, ALA. AND GA. (See Section 42 of Text) Provides for full development of Alabama-Coosa Rivers and tributaries for navigation, flood control power, recreation, and other purposes. Authorized construction of Carters Lake, Ga., Claiborne Lock and Dam, Ala., Jones Bluff Lock and Dam, Ala., and Millers Ferry Lock and Dam, Ala. Suspended comprehensive plan to permit non-Federal interests to develop Coosa River by constructing series of dams. ALLATOONA LAKE, COOSA RIVER BASIN, GA. (See Section 43 of Text) Provides for dam and reservoir for flood control, regulation of stream flow for navigation, development of hydroelectric power and recreation APALACHICOLA, CHATTAHOOCHEE, AND FLINT RIVERS, ALA., GA. AND FLA. (See Section 44 of Text) Development of Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, and Flint Rivers for navigation, flood control, hydropower, and recreation. Modified general plan for full development of Apalachicola. Chattahoochee. and Flint River System anti authorized construction of Lake Sidney Lanier multipurpose reservoir. Documents H. Doc. 549, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 143, 90th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 282, 92d Cong., 2d Sess. DPR (Sec. 205) DPR (Sec. 208) Special Report on Record in OCE. (Public Law 222, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 167, 84th Cong., 1st Sess. PL (96-304) H. Doc. 414, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. Public Law 436, 83rd Cong. Public Law 228, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 674, 76th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 324, 7th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 300. 80th Cong.. 1st Sess. 10-40 MOBILE, ALA., DISTRICT TABLE 10-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents 1)ec. 22, 1944 Authorized recreation facilities. .Jan. 27, 1981 Modified the existing project to provide for DPR (Sec. 107) nine foot deep by 100-foot wide side channel into the Apalachicola River Industrial Park, Blountstown, Fla. LAKE SIDNEY LANIER, GA. (See Section 44A of Text) July 24, 1944 Provision of recreation facilities. GEORGE W. ANDREWS LOCK AND DAM, ALA. AND GA. (See Section 44B of Text) July 24, 1946 Construction of high dam at Walter F. George site H. Doc. 300, 80th Cong., and low dam at (;eorge W. Andrews site. 1st Sess. Dec. 22, 1944 Provided recreation facilities. JIM WOODRUFF LOCK AND DAM, GA. AND FLA. (See Section 44C of Text) Dec. 22, 1944 Provided recreation facilities. SPEWRELL BLUFF LAKE, GA. (See Section 44D of Text) Dec. 30, 1965 Authorized construction H. Doc. 567, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. WALTER F. GEORGE LOCK AND DAM, ALA, AND GA. (See Section 44Eof Text) May 19, 1953 Authorized construction of high dam at Walter F. George H. Comm. on Public Works. site and low dam at Columbia site. WEST POINT LAKE, CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVER BASIN, GA. AND ALA. (See Section 44F of Text) Oct. 23, 1962 Authorized construction for flood control, power, H. Doc. 570, 87th Cong., recreation, fish and wildlife development, and 2d Sess. streamflow regulation for downstream navigation. 1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under Section 107 ' of Flood Control Act of 1948. of 1960 River and Harbor Act. 3. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under Section 208 2. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under Section 205 of Flood Control Act of 1954. 10-41 TABLE 10-C REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 BLACK WARRIOR AND TOMBIGBEE RIVERS, ALA. (See Section 6 of Text) Coffeeville Lock and Dam Miles above Mobile2 Nearest town (Alabama) Distance (miles) Lock: Greatest length available for full width (feet) Width of chamber (feet) Maximum lift (feet) Depth over sills at low water (feet) Character of foundation Kind of spillway Type construction Lock Dam Year completed Year opened to navigation Actual cost of lock and dam 116.7 2] Coffeeville D 3)within city) 6 600.0 110 34 13.0 Rock Demopolis Lock and Dam Warrior Lock and Dam 13.2 261.1 )emopolis Eutaw 15 600.0 110 40 13.0 Rock Fixed-Gated Fixed 600.0 110 22 William John Hollis Bacon Oliver Holt Bankhead Lock Lock Lock and Dam and Dam and Dam 338.2 347.0 365.5 Tuscaloosa Tuscaloosa Oak Grove 450.0 95 28 600.0 110 64 13.2 12.0 13.0 Sand, clay Hard shale Shale, sandstone Gated Fixed Gated Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Earth- Concrete 1965 1962 1962 1960 1954 1957 $21,597,264 $19,774,583 $13,295,553 600.0 110 68 14.0 Sandstone Gated Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete 1940 1939 $4,450,874 1969 1966 $28,100,0003 Under const. 1975 $49,802,402 1. Single lift lock 2. Navigation mileage from foot of Government Street, Mobile, Ala. 3. Excludes cost of adding recreation facilities. 4. Cost to date (FY 81) for replacement of single lift lock TABLE 10-D wncn was essentially completed in F 'Y 80. Excludes $1,435,636 cost of land submerged, damage to structures, and cost of spillway. Also excludes $3,824,859 cost of original double lift lock. Lock Pearl River Lock No. 1 Pearl River Lock No. 2 Pearl River Lock No. 3 Miles above mouth 29.7 40.8 44.0 Nearest town Pearl River, La. Bush, La. Sun, La. Miles to nearest town 9 3 2 Greatest length available 310 310 310 for full width (feet) Lift (feet) 26.7 14 11 Depth over sills at low 10 10 10 water (feet) Character of foundation Sand, gravel, silt, clay Sand, gravel, silt, clay Sand, gravel, silt, clay Type of construction Concrete and steel Concrete and steel Concrete and steel Year completed 1949 1950 1950 Date opened for navigation November 1958 November 1953 November 1953 Actual cost of lock $2,119,100 $1,967,537 $1,497,539 Note: The responsibility of maintaining this project was transferred to the Vicksburg District, Lower Mississippi Valley Division on 1 October 1981. District boundaries have been changed and Mobile I)istrict will no longer report on the Pearl River Project. 10-42 LOCKS IN PEARL RIVER PROJECT (See Section 21 of Text) MOBILE, ALA., DISTRICT TABLE 10-E RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS (See Section 27 of Text) Cost During Project Date of Survey Fiscal Year Carrabelle Harbor, Fla. February 1981 $ 898 LaGrange Bayou, Fla. April 1981 3,546 Panacea Harbor, Fla. February 1981 201 Pass Christian, Miss. March 1981 1,361 St. Marks River, Fla. February 1981 25,905 Total $31,9111 1. Other cost of surveys, included under 0 & M for Creek, Ala., $263; Panama City Harbor, Fla., $9,717;. Penrespective projects are: Biloxi Harbor, Miss., $1,577; sacola Harbor, Fla., $268; and Port St. Joe Harbor, Fla., Blackwater River, Fla., $5,813; Bon Secour Ala., $48; East $1,794. Pearl River, Miss., $8,774; Escambia Bay, Fla., $10,752; Fly OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION (See Section 28 of Text) PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1981 Full Report See Annual Operation and Report For Construction Maintenance Bluff Creek Miss.' 1963 $ 1,000 $ 6,883 Bogue Chitto, La.2 1909 14,913 2,930 Bon Secour River, Ala. 1979 118,615 91,194 Cahaba River, Ala. 2 1894 45,000 Carrabelle Bar and Harbor, Fla. 1979 481,627 374,121 Choctawhatchee River, Fla. and Ala. 1973 171,885 291,694 Holmes Creek, Fla. 1931 8,562 36,800 LaGrange Bayou, Fla. 1972 289,496 77,373 Leaf and Chickasawhay River, Miss. 2 1919 23,090 42,676 Noxubee River, Miss.' 1902 47,528 14,472 Ocholockonee (Ochlockney) River, Ga. and Fla.' 2 1900 5,000 Old Town Creek, Miss.' 2 1887 3,000 Oostanaula and Coosawatee River, Ga.' 2 1907 32,656 Panacea Harbor, Fla. 1979 122,383 91,081 Pascagoula River, Miss. 1956 15,000 179,380 Pass Christian Harbor, Miss. 1976 59,313 135,897 Pearl River, Miss., Edinburg to Jackson2 3 1911 31,872 36,991 St. Marks River, Fla. 1965 1,710,809 77,897 Tallapoosa River, Ala.2 1893 43,972 Upper Chipola River, Fla., from Mariana to its mouth' 2 1941 36,781 63,193 Wolf and Jordan Rivers, Miss. 1979 29,195 458,955 1. Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong. 2. Uncompleted portion of project deauthorized by H.' Doc. 96-157. 1st Session. 3. Responsibility for this project was transferred to Vicksburg District, Lower Mississippi Valley Division on 1 October 1981. No further reporting on this project will be made by Mobile District. 10-43 TABLE 10-F REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 10-G NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Section 29 of Text) Study Authority Fiscal Year 1981 Costs Alligator Harbor, Fla. 107 $ 2,232 Bon Secour, Ala. 107 6,000 East Point, Fla. 107 1,503 GIWW to Port Bienville, Miss. 107 14,610 Lake Krebs, Miss. 107 805 Old Pass Lagoon, Fla. 107 21,241 Panacea, Fla. 107 16,967 Perdido Beach, Ala. 107 7,051 Port of Long Beach, Miss. 107 2,863 Shell Point, Waukulla Co., Fla. 107 49,785 Liza Jackson State Park, Ft. Walton, Fla. 103 9,722 Total $132,7791 1. Excludes $212,081 for Rysco Shipyard Channel, Fla. Construction. TABLE 10-H OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECT (See Section 30 of Text) For Last Cost to September 30, 1981 Full Report See Annual Operation and Report For Construction Maintenance2 Harrison County, Miss., shore protection' 1953 $1,133,000 1. Completed. local interests. 2. Operation and maintenance is the responsibility of TABLE 10-I DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS (See Section 31 of Text) Year of Last Deauthorization Date Project Type Full Report Document' Deauthorized Bayou (Galere, Miss. Navigation 1946 H. Doc. 192, 94th Cong.. 5 Aug. 1977 1st Sess.. as amended. 1. H. Doc. 96-157 deauthorized uncompleted portions of certain projects as shown in Table 10-F. 10-44 MOBILE, ALA., DISTRICT TABLE 10-J OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 37 of Text) For Last Cost to September 30, 1981 Full Report See Annual Operation and Report For Construction Maintenance4 Alabama River at Montgomery, Ala.' 1965 $144,194 Armuchee Creek, Ga.l 1966 115,547 Beaver Creek, Montezuma, Ga. 1958 149,815 Black Creek, Gadsden, Ala. 1953 125,389 Clanton, Ala.2 1964 274,024 Collinsville, Ala. 1940 71,119 Jackson and East Jackson, Miss. 1979 7,190,200 Lake Douglas, Decatur County, Ga. 1970 164,998 Little Cove Creek, Glencoe, Ala. 1965 113,849 Murder and Burnt Corn Creeks, Brewton, Ala. 1980 190,974 23 Pearl River, Miss., and La., Jackson, Miss. 1937 Prattville, Autauga Creek, Ala. 1946 649,280 Rome, Coosa River, Ga. 1955 384,550 Sowashee Creek, Meridian, Miss.2 1956 142,637 Town Creek, Americus, Ga. 1965 340,409 Trussville, Ala. 1965 141,334 2 West Point, Chattahoochee River, Ga. 1955 599,637 Yellow Jacket Creek, Ffogansville, Ga.2 1966 330,734 1. Engineering, design, supervision, and administra- 3. Work authorized before 1941 completed. No work tion (no construction work has been done. Includes $17,000 for done on project proposed in 1941. preauthorization studies. 4. Operation and maintenance is the responsibility of 2. Completed. local interests. TABLE 10-K FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Section 41 of Text) (a) Study Authority Fiscal Year Costs Big and Little Wills Creek, Attalla, Ala. 205 $ 4,731 Bishop Creek, Pelham, Ala. 205 24,078 Burketts Creek, Amory, Miss. 205 19,117 Chattahoochee River, Helen, Ga. 205 42,652 Gum Creek, Cordele, Ga. 205 3,374 Horseleg Creek, Rome, Ga. 205 2,069 Mill Creek, Dalton, Ga. 205 300 Norton Creek, Saraland, Ala. 205 39,773 Sandy Creek, Laurel, Miss. 205 42,247 Sellers Creek, Mendenhall, Miss. 205 50,084 Sope Creek, Marietta, Ga. 205 3,597 Threemile Creek, Mobile, Ala. 205 233,077 Valpariso, Fla. 14 18,380 Total $483,4791 1. Excludes construction costs of $10,836 for Gordons Creek, Miss.; $3,086 for Chickasawbogue Creek, Ala.; $247,072 for I-2') Bridge at Jackson. Miss.; $266,577 for streambank erosion control at Monticello, Miss.; and. $637 for shoreline erosion control demonstration. 10-45 TABLE 10-L REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 ALABAMA-COOSA RIVERS, ALA. AND GA. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED UNDER EXISTING PROJECT (See Sections 42 and 43 of Text) Claiborne Millers Ferry Jones Bluff Carters Allatoona Proposed Structures Lock and Dam Lock and Dam Lock and Dam Lake Dam3 Dam Miles above mouth of river 81.11 42.21 245.41 26.82 47.84 Nearest town Claiborne, Ala. Camden, Ala. Benton, Ala. Carters, Ga. Cartersville, Ga. Distance (miles) 7 10 3 2 4 Greatest lock length available for full width (feet) 600 600 600 - - Width of lock chamber (feet) 84 84 84 - - Maximum lift (feet) 30 48 47 - - Elevation of normal pool surface (mean sea level) 35 80 125 1072 Varies seasonally Depth over sills at low water 13 Upper 15 Upper 15 - - (feet) Lower 13 Lower 12 Character of foundation Rock Rock Rock Rock Rock Kind of spillway Gated and Gated Gated Gated Gated Fixed Crest Height of dam (feet) 95.5 99.5 94 451 190 Type of construction Concrete Concrete Concrete Rock-fill Concrete Earth Core Total reservoir capacity (acre-feet) 96,360 331,800 234,200 472,800 670,050 Power development (kw) - 75,000 68,000 500,000 74,000 Percent complete 100 100 95 100 100 Cost to date:5 $27,997,450 $62,698,378 $80,240,763 $111,059,026 $33,961,311 1. Above mouth of Alabama River (river miles). 2. Above mouth of Coosawattee River (river miles). 3. Reregulation dam (Carters) 25.3 (river miles). 4. Above mouth of Etowah River (river miles). 5. Includes cost of added recreation facilities as shown in Table 10-A. 10-46 TABLE 10-M APALACHICOLA, CHATTAHOOCHEE, AND FLINT RIVERS, ALA., GA., AND FLA., LOCKS AND DAMS AND MULTIPLE-PURPOSE DEVELOPMENT INCLUDED IN EXISTING PROJECT (See Section 44 of Text) Existing Projects Authorized Projects Jim George W. Walter F. Buford Dam Lower Woodruff Andrews George Lake Auchumpkee Lazer Spewrell Lock Lock Lock West Point Sidney Creek Creek Bluff and Dam and Dam and Dam Lake Lanier Lake Lake Lake Miles above mouth 107.61 46.5 75.02 201.42 348.32 233.43 255.8 263.8 Nearest town Chattahoochee, Columbia, Ala. Ft. Gaines, West Point, Buford, Ga. Roberta, Ga. Thomaston, Manchester, Fla. Ga. Ga. Ga. Ga. Distance (miles) 1 1 2 2.8 5 7 8 8 Greatest lock length 450 450 450 - - - - available for full width (feet) Width of chamber (feet) 82 82 82 - .- - Maximum lift (feet) 33 25 88 - - - - Elevation of normal pool 77 102 190 (Summer) 635 (Summer) 1070 417 543 700 surface (msl) 185 (Winter) 625 (Winter) Depth over sills at low 14 13 13 - - - - water (feet) Character of foundation Limestone Limestone Limestone Rock Rock Rock Rock Rock Kind of spillway Fixed-gated Fixed-gated Gated Gated Fixed Gated Gated Gated Height of dam (feet) 67 62 114 95 192 130 142 180 Type of construction Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Earth Concrete Concrete Concrete and Earth and Earth and Earth and Earth and Earth and Earth Total reservoir capacity 367,300 18,180 934,400 604,500 2,554,000 548,000 342,000 486,200 (acre-feet) Power development 30,000 - 130,000 73,875 86,000 81,000 87.000 150,000 (kilowatts) Percent complete 100 100 100 98 100 -- - Year opened to navigation 1954 1962 1963 - - - - Estimated cost: - - - - $222,000,000 $258,000,000 $360,000,000 Cost to date:4 $47,914,00 $13,038,427 $87,362,4125 $129,654,353 $51,878,019 - - $2,158,652 1. Above mouth of Apalachicola River (river miles). 4. Includes cost of added recreational facilities as shown 2. Above mouth of Chattahoochee River (river miles). in Table 10-A. 3. Above mouth of Flint River (river miles). 5. Includes $333,198 cost of land for wildlife refuge. N REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 COMPLETED FLOOD INSURANCE STUDIES AND FLOOD HAZARD INFORMATION REPORTS FOR FY 1979 THRU FY 19811 (See Section 47 of Text) Study Flood Insurance Studies Ft. Payne, Alabama Geneva, Alabama Picayune, Mississippi Kennesaw, Georgia Powder Springs, Georiga Montgomery, Alabama Fulton Co., Georiga Montgomery Co., Alabama Roanoke, Alabama Wedowee, Alabama Heflin, Alabama Randolph County, Alabama Hobson City, Alabama Oxford, Alabama Weaver, Alabama Date Federal Requesting Agency Completed Cost (Prepared for Federal Insurance Administration, HUD) (Prepared for Federal Insurance Administration, HUD) (Prepared for Federal Insurance Administration, HUD) (Prepared for Federal Insurance Administration, HUD) (Prepared for Federal Insurance Administration, HUD) (Prepared for Federal Insurance Administration, HUD) (Prepared for Federal Insurance Administration, HUD) (Prepared for Federal Insurance Administration, HUD) (Prepared for Federal Insurance Administration, HUD) (Prepared for Federal Insurance Administration, HUD) (Prepared for Federal Insurance Administration, HUD) (Prepared for Federal Insurance Administration, HUD) (Prepared for Federal Insurance Administration, HUD) (Prepared for Federal Insurance Administration, HUD) (Prepared for Federal Insurance Administration, HUD) Oct 78 Oct 78 Oct 78 Jan 79 Jan 79 Feb 79 Sep 79 Apr 80 Feb 81 Feb 81 Mar 81 Mar 81 Sep 81 Sep 81 Sep 81 $40,200 32,800 46,000 4,100 5,500 186,500 209,000 104,600 19,400 21,900 20,700 34,400 14,200 30,000 6,400 Special Flood Hazard Information Chattahoochee River, Walter Lower Chattahoochee Area Planning Apr 79 133,000 F. George to West Pt. Dam, Ga. and Development Commission Mulberry Fork and Cane Creek, Ala. Birmingham Regional Planning Commission July 79 50,000 Coldwater Creek, Ala. Coldwater United Methodist Church July 79 10,000 Yellowjacket Creek & City of Hogansville, Ga. July 79 10,000 Hogansville Branch, Ga. Dowling Branch, Ala. City of Hartford, Ala. Jan 80 10,000 Gum Creek, Ga. Housing Authority, Cordele, Ga. Sep 80 10,000 Choctawhatchee River, Fla. Board of County Commissioners Jan 81 10,000 Holmes County, Fla. 1. For list of reports completed by Mobile District for FY and, for reports completed in FY 1976 and FY 1977, see FY 1965 thru FY 1974 Annual Report, page 10-50; reports com- 1977 Annual Report, page 10-46. See page 10-48 FY 1978 Anpleted in FY 1975 see FY 1975 Annual Report, page -10-44; nual Report for FY 1978 reports. 10-48 TABLE 10-N 1981 NEW ORLEANS, LA., DISTRICT* District comprises a portion of Louisiana, including drainage area of Red River south of Fulton, Ark., embraced in drainage basins tributary to Mississippi River and Gulf of Mexico, except Mississippi River above mile 325.5 above Head of Passes, drainage area of Ouchita-Black River Basin, and small eastern and western portions of Louisiana tributary to Pearl River and Sabine River and Lake. It includes sections of the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway from Lake Borgne Light 29 at the mouth of Pearl River to Sabine River, and the Passes of the Mississippi River. It exercises jurisdiction over flood control work on Mississippi River from mile 325.5 AHP to Gulf of Mexico; on Red River including its south bank levees and tributaries from Index, Ark., to its junction with Old River and Atchafalaya River; Atchafalaya River; and in Atchafalaya Basin; and maintenance of project navigation channel of Mississippi River below mile 325.5 AHP, under supervision of President, Mississippi River Commission (MRC), and Division Engineer, Lower Mississippi Valley Division. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page Aquatic Plant Control Program, La ........... 11-2 Atchafalaya River and Bayous Chene, Boeuf, and Black, La. ................. 11-2 Atchafalaya River, Morgan City to Gulf of Mexico, La. ......................... 11-3 Barataria Bay Waterway, La. ................. 11-3 Bayou Lafourche and Lafourche- Jump Waterway, La. ....................... 11-4 Bayou Teche and Vermilion River, La. ......... 11-5 Bayou Teche, La. .......................... 11-5 Calcasieu River and Pass, La. ................. 11-6 Calcasieu River at Devil's Elbow, La. .......... 11-7 Freshwater Bayou, La. ........................ 11-7 Gulf Intracoastal Waterway between Apalachee Bay, Fla., and Mexican Border (New Orleans Dist.) ....... ........ 11-7 Houma Navigation Canal, La .................. 11-9 Mermentau River, La. .......... ......... 11-10 Mississippi River, Baton Rouge to Gulf of Mexico, La ......................... 11-10 Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet, La. ........... 11-12 Mississippi River Outlets, Venice, La ..................................... 11-12 Overton-Red River Waterway, La. ........... 11-13 Petit Anse, Tigre, and Carlin Bayous, La ......................... 11-13 Red River emergency bank protection ......... 11-13 Red River Waterway-Mississippi River to Shreveport, La...................... 11-14 Removing water-hyacinth, La. ............... 11-14 Tangipahoa River, La. ............. ..... 11-15 Navigation (cont.) Page 23. Vermilion Lock, La. (replacement of lock) ......................... 11-15 24. Waterway from Empire, La., to Gulf of Mexico ..................... ........ 11-15 25. Waterway from Intracoastal Waterway to Bayou Dulac, La. (Bayous Grand Caillou and LeCarpe, La.) .......................... 11-15 26. Other authorized navigation projects .......... 11-16 27. Navigation work under special authorization .......................... 11-16 Flood Damage Prevention 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. 35. 36. 37. 38. Page Bayou Bodcau and tributaries, Ark. and La. .............................. 11-16 Bayou Bodcau Reservoir, La. ................ 11-16 Bayou Pierre, La ........................ . 11-17 Brush Bayou, La........................ 11-17 Caddo Lake, La. ............................... 11-17 Grand Isle & Vicinity, La. ................... . 11-17 Lake Pontchartrain and vicinity, La., (hurricane protection) ................. 11-18 Larose Vo Golden Meadow, La. (hurricane protection) .......... ......... 11-19 McKinney Bayou, Ark. and Tex ............... 11-19 New Orleans to Venice, La., (hurricane protection) ......................... 11-20 Red River below Denison Dam (New Orleans Dist.) .......... ......... 11-20 *All cost and financial statements and authorizing legislation for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 11-1 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 Flood Damage Prevention (cont.) Page Red River below Denison Dam, levees and bank stabilization (New Orleans Dist.) .............. 11-21 Red River Waterway-Shreveport, La., to Index, Ark ........................ 11-21 Wallace Lake, La. .......................... 11-22 West Agurs, La. ............... ....... 11-22 Inspection of completed flood damage prevention projects ................... 11-23 Flood Damage Prevention (cont.) 44. 45. Page Other authorized flood damage prevention projects ... .................. 11-23 Flood damage prevention work under special authorization .......................... 11-23 General Investivations 46. Active Investigations .... ................. 11-23 Navigation 1. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL PROGRAM, LA. Location. Lakes and streams in State of Louisiana. Existing project. Provides for control and progressive eradication of water-hyacinth, alligatorweed, and other obnoxious aquatic plant growth from navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters in North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, Florida, Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana, and Texas, in combined interests of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, public health, and related purposes, including continued research for development of most effective and economic control measures. The modification of the 1965 Act provides for comprehensive program for control and progressive eradication of waterhyacinth, alligatorweed, Eurasian water milfoil, and other obnoxious plant growths from navigable waterways, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters of the United States, in combined interest of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, public health, and related purposes, including continued research for development of most effective and economic control measures. Research and planning costs undertaken pursuant to 1965 Act shall be borne fully by the United States and shall not be included in costs to be shared by local interests. Local cooperation. Local interests must hold and save the United States free from claims and participate in project to extent of 30 percent of cost of operations. State of Louisiana, Office of Public Works, and Louisiana Department of Wild Life and Fisheries furnished a joint assurance of local cooperation, which was approved Apr. 29 and accepted May 4, 1959. Under provisions of continuing contract, local agencies are performing work in kind, exceeding 30 percent of cost of program. Operations and results during fiscal year. Combined efforts by Corps of Engineers crews and crews of the State of Louisiana, Department of Wild Life and Fisheries, continued against aquatic vegetation problems throughout the State. Water-hyacinth control requires maintenance work in all areas, and water-hyacinth persists as the most serious aquatic pest. Control maintenance by the Corps of cleared areas continued in the Mermentau River, Bayou Lacassine, Bayou Queue de Tortue, in the Bayou Teche Basin south of U.S. Highway 190, including the lakes west of the Atchafalaya Floodway, in the feeder areas of the Port Allen-Morgan City Route of the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, and in the feeder areas to the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway in Coastal Louisiana. Louisiana Department of Wild Life and Fisheries crews continued maintenance efforts in the major lakes and streams of north Louisiana, in the Atchafalaya Floodway, in the Louisiana portion of the Toledo Bend Reservoir, and the Pearl River Basin within Louisiana. During the fiscal year, 20,757 acres of water-hyacinths were destroyed in the State of Louisiana under this funding. Louisiana Department of Wild Life and Fisheries crews destroyed 15,658 acres and Corps of Engineers crews destroyed 5,099 acres primarily by herbicide treatment. The alligatorweed flea beetle (Agasicles hygrophila) population has increased to the point that they are again exercising significant control of this plant in many areas of the state. In addition, the stem boring moth (Vogtia malloi) has spread to such an extent that it is found associated with alligatorweed in all locations. The water-hyacinth weevils (Neochetina eichhorniae and Neochetina bruchi) have been spread throughout all areas of the state that water-hyacinth infest and adult feeding scars are more prevalent everywhere. Submersed weed problems in Toledo Bend Reservoir have reached serious proportions and Caddo Lake is also experiencing interference with boating and fishing. Hydrilla verticillata, an introduced exotic submersed weed species, continues to spread along the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway and poses a threat to water-related activities. Condition as of Sep. 30. Operations under 1958 River and Harbor Act, initiated May 1959, are complete. Operations under 1965 Act were initiated in Fiscal Year 1968. Waterways are being cleared, then maintained as required. 2. ATCHAFALAYA RIVER AND BAYOUS CHENE, BOEUF, AND BLACK, LA. Location. The improvement is located in the parishes of Assumption, Terrebonne, and St. Mary, La., in the vicinity of Morgan City, along Bayous Chene, Boeuf, and Black, and the Lower Atchafalaya River to the Gulf of Mexico. (Refer to MRC alluvial maps, Morgan City, Belle Isle, and Point au Fer quadrangles, NOAA Coast Charts Nos. 11351 and 11355 of Intracoastal Waterway, and Coast Chart No. 11354 for the Atchafalaya River system.) Existing project. Provides for enlargement and extension of project, Atchafalaya River, Morgan City to the Gulf of Mexico, La., to obtain navigation channels 20 feet deep over a bottom width of 400 feet from vicinity of U.S. Highway 90 crossing 11-2 39. 40. 41. 42. 43. NEW ORLEANS, LA., DISTRICT over Bayou Boeuf to the Gulf of Mexico via Bayou Boeuf, Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, Bayou Chene, Avoca Island Cutoff, the lower Atchafalaya River, Atchafalaya Bay to the Gulf of Mexico, and from near U.S. Highway 90 to Bayou Chene via Bayou Black and the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway. The 400- foot channel extends into the Gulf of Mexico to the 20-foot contour, and the width in Bayou Boeuf would be reduced to 300 feet where necessary because of industrial development on both sides of the bayou. Estimated cost for new work (October 1981) is $33,600,000 Federal and $2,270,000 non-Federal, including $1,000,000 contributed funds. In addition, Coast Guard is to provide navigation aids at an estimated cost of $220,000. Local cooperation. For details see page 11-3, Annual Report for FY 1980. Assuring Agency: Morgan City Harbor and Terminal District. Basic assurance was approved on behalf of United States on Dec. 10, 1973, and amended assurance containing the applicable provisions of Public Law 91-646 and Public Law 91-611 was approved on behalf of United States on Feb. 25, 1974. In an effort to expedite the project, local interests have accomplished the surveys, soil borings, testing, and the basic mapping at an estimated cost of $250,000, for which they will not be reimbursed. As a convenience to local interests and to avoid confusion in 25 percent and 75 percent acquisition cost, the New Orleans District agreed to acquire all lands, with local interests reimbursing the Government for their 25 percent portion. An escrow agreement has been executed between the local interests and the Government, whereby, they will advance funds in a sufficient amount to provide for their portion of the acquisition and diking cost. To date original advance of $518,000 has been withdrawn; however, local interests will be required to deposit in escrow an additional $456,000. Local interests have asked that the Government invoke the navigation servitude under the Commerce Clause of the Constitution, thereby requiring pipeline owners to relocate their pipeline at no expense to local interests or the Government. Terminal facilities. Two large and three small public wharves at Morgan City are open for use by all without charge. In addition, there are numerous privately owned facilities on both banks of the lower Atchafalaya River in Morgan City and Berwick, La., and along Bayou Boeuf and the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway. Fabrication and repair facilities are located on Bayous Boeuf and Black. Adequate acreage is available for expansion of existing terminals and construction of new terminals along Bayous Chene, Boeuf, and Black, and the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway. Public and private terminals in the project area are adequately connected with rail, water, and highway transportation facilities. No additional public wharves are required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Contract for dredging at Bayou Chene reach, stations 269+00 to 1030+00 commenced dredging Nov. 18, 1980 and was completed Sep. 29, 1981 with a total of 17,354,952 cubic yards of material removed. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated on the Atchafalaya Bay and gulf reach in April 1974. The project is 100 percent complete. 3. ATCHAFALAYA RIVER, MORGAN CITY TO GULF OF MEXICO, LA. Location. Atchafalaya River is the outlet of Red River and diverted flow from Mississippi River. It begins about 4.5 miles west of Old River navigation lock on northern boundary of Pointe Coupee Parish, and flows generally south about 135 miles and empties into Atchafalaya Bay, an inlet of the gulf. Section under improvement is from 20-foot contour in Atchafalaya Bay, 4 miles beyond mouth of Atchafalaya River, to 20-foot contour in Gulf of Mexico. (Refer to NOAA Coast Chart No. 11351, MRC alluvial valley maps, Morgan City, Belle Isle, and Point au Fer quadrangles, and NOAA Small- Craft Chart No. 11355 of Gulf Intracoastal Waterway and Chart No. 11354 of the Atchafalaya River System.) Existing project. A 20- by 200-foot channel from 20-foot contour in Atchafalaya Bay to 20-foot contour in Gulf of Mexico. Project depth refers to mean low water. Normal range of tide is 10 inches; extreme range 14 inches; hurricane range, 10 feet. The existing project, prior to the modification of August 1968, was completed at a cost of $501,963. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. For details see page 11-4, Annual Report Fiscal Year 1980. Terminal facilities. At Morgan City there are several small private wharves and two large and three small public ones open for use of all without charge. There are no warehouses needed, as business section is on riverfront and all freight is transferred directly from boats to stores. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results duringfiscal year. Hired labor forces continued condition and operation studies, reconnaissance surveys, and water quality studies. Dredging in the main channel, stations 475+00 to 1300+00, began Jul. 4, 1981 and is 58 percent complete, with a total of 5,059,300 cubic yards of material removed. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated in Fiscal Year 1911 and completed in Fiscal Year 1914. 4. BARATARIA BAY WATERWAY, LA. Location. In Jefferson Parish, La., and extends about 37 miles southerly from junction of Gulf Intracoastal Waterway and Bayour Barataria near Lafitte Post Office. From its origin it extends southerly through Bay Barataria, Bayou Dupont, a land cut (known as Dupre Cut) through marsh area, Bayou Cutler, Bayou St. Denis, and Barataria Bay to east end of Bayou Rigaud. At its southerly terminus it also connects with Barataria Pass and through that pass with the Gulf of Mexico. (Refer to NOAA Coast Charts Nos. 11352, 11340, and 11535 and Geological Survey quadrangles, Barataria, Bay Dogris, Wilkinson Bay, and Barataria Pass.) Previous project. For details see page 562 of Annual Report for 1963. Existing project. A channel about 37 miles long with a 12- foot depth and 125-foot width from its beginning at Gulf Intracoastal Waterway to Grand Isle, La., following route of previous project to mile 15.5 in Bayou St. Denis; thence by a relocated channel along western shore of Barataria Bay and through Barataria Pass to 12-foot-depth contour in the gulf, with an extension of project to include westerly 4.3 miles of Bayou Rigaud. Normal range of tide is 30 inches at mouth and 11-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 6 inches at head. Elevation of water surface near mouth, due to hurricanes, has been over 6 feet. Existing project was completed at a cost of $1,499,648. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. For details see page 563, Annual Report Fiscal Year 1963. Terminal facilities. Six privately-owned wharves at Lafitte; three privately owned facilities at Grand Isle; and wharfage in Bayou Rigaud at Grand Isle constructed by shrimping industry are available to all boats without charge. About 7 miles below Lafitte there is a large oil terminal for transferring production of Lafitte field to barges. Adjacent to Bayou Barataria and along Bayou Rigaud adequate sites are available for future use. Operations and results during fiscal year. Hired labor continued condition and operation studies, stream gaging, and water quality studies. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated in May 1960 and completed in November 1963. 5. BAYOU LAFOURCHE AND LAFOURCHE-JUMP WATERWAY, LA. Location. Prior to 1902, Bayou Lafourche was an outlet of Mississippi River, its head being at Donaldsonville, La., 80 miles above New Orleans. It flows southerly 107 miles to Gulf of Mexico. (Refer to NOAA Coast Charts Nos. 11340 and 11357; MRC alluvial valley maps; Donaldsonville, White Castle, Napoleonville, Thibodaux, and Lac des Allemands quadrangles; and Geological Survey maps, Houma, Cutoff, Lake Felicity, Mink Bayou, Leeville, and Belle Pass quadrangles.) Previous projects. For details see page 564 of 1963 Annual Report. Existing project. Provides for permanent closure of head of bayou without a lock, a channel 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide from Canal Boulevard in Thibodaux to Lockport, and from Larose to Gulf of Mexico with a jettied entrance at Belle Pass, and the closure of Pass Fourchon. These improvements are about 50.5 miles long, and the modification of Jul. 14, 1960, provides for an additional 66 miles of improvement as follows: a 12- by 125-foot channel, extending from Gulf Intracoastal Waterway at mile 37.2 west of Harvey Lock to enter Bayou Lafourche below highway bridge at Leeville at about mile 12; a 12- by 125-foot channel in Bayou Lafourche from point of junction with proposed 12- by 125-foot channel to 12-footdepth contour in gulf; modification and extension of existing jetties from 6- by 12-foot contour, if found advisable to reduce maintenance dredging in the gulf; and a channel 9 by 100 feet in Bayou Lafourche from Leeville to vicinity of lower limits of Golden Meadow; and a 12- by 125-foot channel from Bayou Lafourche at Leeville from point where auxiliary channel connects with Bayou Lafourche through Southwestern Louisiana Canal to and through Bayou Rigaud to connect with enlargement of Bayou Rigaud recommended under project "Barataria Bay Waterway, La." Normal range of tide is 10 inches at mouth and 3 inches at head; from severe rains, 3 to 10 feet at head; from hurricanes, up to 10 feet at mouth. Estimated cost for new work (October 1980) is $10,500,000 Federal and $6,050,000 non-Federal. In addition, Coast Guard is to provide navigation aids at an estimated cost of $43,000. Excavation of a channel 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide from Thibodaux to Gulf Intracoastal Waterway at Lockport is considered inactive and excluded from foregoing cost estimate. Estimated cost of this portion (July 1974) is $733,000. Local cooperation. Original assurances received and accepted on all items of work in the project. Provisions of Public Law 91-611 are not applicable; however, provisions of Public Law 91-646 are applicable. Supplemental assurances covering Public Law 91-646 have been executed by the Jefferson Parish Council and Lafourche Parish Police Jury; however, the Louisiana Office of Public Works has not executed supplemental assurances. Golden Meadow to gulf. Local agency has acquired all rightsof- way and furnished rights-of-entry. Leeville to Grand Isle: No action is apparent on this stretch by either the Lafourche Parish Police Jury, the Jefferson Parish Council, the local assurers, or the State of Louisiana, Office of Public Works. Rights-of-way are not available due to multiplicity and other complications of ownership. The "Jump" portion of the project was classified as inactive on May 4, 1977. The Jefferson Parish Council and the Lafourche Parish Police Jury were requested to provide information as to whether they still favor construction on this part. If reactivation is favored, it should be with the understanding that they would have to provide required rights-of-way when requested. The Greater Lafourche Port Commission stated that they may provide assurances for that portion of the project located in Lafourche Parish. These assurances were forwarded to the Greater Lafourche Port Commission on Jan 22, 1979. On Mar. 9, 1979, we requested information as to the status of their execution of the assurances. The Greater Lafourche Port Commission appears to be reluctant to execute the required assurances. Terminal facilities. There are numerous private warehouses, wharves, and stiff-leg derricks for handling cane along bayou. At Lockport, Barker Barge Line has a barge wharf with covered shed, and Southern Pacific Railroad maintains a large wharf with covered shed. At Golden Meadow each of the seafood canneries has docking facilities suitable for its needs. Four oil companies have docks at Leeville for transferring production of Leeville oil fields to barges. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work by hired labor consisted of engineering studies. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction of existing projects was initiated in Fiscal Year 1939 and is 10 percent complete. Dredging between Larose, La., and Gulf of Mexico was completed in 1939, and that segment between Lockport and Napoleonville, La., is in an inactive status due to lack of rightof- way and spoil area. Jetties at mouth of Belle Pass were completed in 1939, and later damaged by storm action, which required placement of additional stone adjacent to both sides of steel sheet pile jetties in 1940, and repair and extension of jetties in 1941. During Fiscal Year 1948, stone jetties were repaired and extended inland about 700 feet from shoreline; and steel sheet pile section was strengthened for about 250 feet gulfward of stone jetties, by placement of stone on both gulf and bayou sides. On May 31, 1949, an automatic tide gage for recording hurricane and storm tides was installed. Modification of Jul. 14, 1960, was initiated in February 1963 and is 10 percent complete, with 12- by 125-foot channel completed in September 1963 from Leeville to 12-foot contour in Gulf of Mexico, the 9- by 100-foot channel completed in August 1966 11-4 NEW ORLEANS, LA., DISTRICT from Golden Meadow to Leeville, and the 9- by 100-foot channel from Golden Meadow to Leeville completed in August 1966. The Greater Lafourche Port Commission requested, and was granted, a permit to dredge a new channel 20 by 300 feet wide west of the existing channel from mile 0.76 in Bayou Lafourche to the 20-foot depth in the gulf, and to close the existing jettied channel after completion of the new channel. This work was completed in March 1968 and the Port Commission must maintain the channel at no less than 12 by 125 feet. 6. BAYOR TECHE AND VERMILION RIVER, LA. Location. Bayou Teche has its source in Bayou Courtableau, in St. Landry Parish, and flows southeasterly 125 miles to its confluence with lower Atchafalaya River, about 10.5 miles above Morgan City, La. Vermilion River, also called Bayou Vermilion, is formed by junction of Bayous Fusilier and Bourbeau, west of Arnaudville, La., and flows southwesterly 72 miles to western end of Vermilion Bay. Bayou Teche is connected with Vermilion River by Bayou Fusilier at Arnaudville; and by Ruth Canal, an artificial, privatelyowned, nonnavigable waterway, constructed for diversion of water from Bayou Teche to Vermilion River for rice irrigation. (Refer to NOAA Coast Charts No. 11340 and 11349; MRC alluvial valley maps; and Geological Survey maps.) Existing project. A navigable channel 51 miles long and 8 by 80 feet from 8-foot-depth contour in Vermilion Bay to Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, thence 9 by 100 feet to head of navigation (mile 52) at Lafayette, La. (fixed bridge at Louisiana State Highway 729, formerly State Highway 1092), with additional enlargement below Abbeville necessary to provide adequate capacity for floodflows; improvement of Vermilion River from Lafayette, La., mile 52, to its junction with lower end of Ruth Canal, mile 57.2, by both widening and deepening to provide a channel 6 by 60 feet, mean gulf level, in order to provide adequate capacity for flood discharges from upper Vermilion River Basin, and also serve irrigation interests by conducting flow of Ruth Canal to lower Vermilion River during rice season. Clearing and enlargement of channel from Ruth Canal to Bayou Fusilier by both widening and deepening to provide a cross section about 50 percent larger than that of existing channel. This improvement is required in interest of flood control in upper Vermilion Basin. Enlargement of channel of Bayou Teche from its head in Bayou Courtableau to a point about 21 miles downstream thereof, by widening and deepening to provide a channel of 35- foot bottom width at minus 2 and minus 3, mean gulf level. Increasing height of Keystone Dam by 3 feet (later revised to 1.5 feet) by installation of a fixed crest spillway. (See individual report for Bayou Teche, La.) In connection with these improvements, the project also provides for replacement of an existing pontoon bridge at Woodlawn over Vermilion River with a vertical-lift structure and lengthening and strengthening approaches to five existing movable bridges Abbevile, La.; Milton, La.; and U.S. Highway 90 (Pinhook Bridge) just below Lafayette, La. Similar work on existing fixed spans over nonnavigable streams is provided for on 11 bridges over Bayou Vermilion above Lafayette, La., and three over upper Bayou Teche. New work completed in 1957 cost $2,891,922. Project was reclassified "Operation and Maintenance, General" under category, "Navigation (Locks, Dams, Reservoirs, and Canals)" by authority of Chief of Engineers, Apr. 23, 1956. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. For details see page 687, Annual Report Fiscal Year 1944. Terminal facilities. Privately-owned, publicly-operated terminals are located on Bayou Teche at Franklin, Jeanerette, New Iberia, and Arnaudville. Other privately-owned boat landings are located at frequent intervals throughout the bayou and public landing is permitted without charge. Facilities on the Vermilion River include a public wharf and two privately-owned barge landing piers at Abbeville equipped for barge truck transfers of general commodities, seven landings for the transfer of petroleum products, and several private landings all along the waterway suitable for small craft. The Vermilion Sugar Company maintains a barge slip at its mill. Present facilities are adequate for existing commerce and there is ample space available for construction of more wharfage. Operations and results during fiscal year. Hired labor forces continued condition and operation studies, stream gaging, and snagging and clearing above Lafayette, La. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction commenced March 1944 and was completed March 1957, when Keystone Dam was raised to provide an increase of 1.5 feet in pool elevation, in order to increase flow through Ruth Canal into Vermilion River. This work was accomplished under navigation improvement "Bayou Teche, La." 7. BAYOU TECHE, LA. Location. Has its source in Bayou Courtableau, in St. Landry Parish, flow southeasterly for 125 miles, and joins lower Atchafalaya River about 10.5 miles above Morgan City, La. (Refer to NOAA Sailing Chart No. 11340, and MRC alluvial valley maps, and Palmetto, Opelousas, Carencro, Arnaudville, St. Martinville, Loreauville, Derouen, Jeanerette, Foster, and Belle Isle quadrangles.) Previous projects. For details see page 569, 1963 Annual Report. Existing project. Provides for a channel 8 feet deep and 80 feet wide on the bottom from mouth of stream to New Iberia, La., mile 54.5, thence 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide on the bottom to Keystone Lock, 18 miles, and thence 6 feet deep and 50 feet wide on the bottom from Keystone Lock to Arnaudville, La., 34 miles, to be secured by dredging, removing snags and overhanging trees, and construction of a lock and dam and regulating works. (See Table 11-C on Keystone Lock.) Raising pool level by 1.5 feet above Keystone Dam by installation of a fixed crest spillway on dam is provided for in flood damage prevention project for Bayou Teche and Vermilion River. La. Under project, flood control, Mississippi River and tributaries, East and West Calumet floodgates, with a width of 45 feet and sill elevation of minus 9.02 feet, mean low gulf level, were constructed in Bayou Teche at east and west approaches to Wax Lake Outlet from February 1949 to September 1950, and a lock was constructed in lower Atchafalaya River in vicinity of Berwick, La., from November 1948 to September 1951. (See Table 11-C on Berwick Lock.) 11-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 Normal range of tide is 10 inches at mouth; 4 inches just below Keystone Lock; extreme, 12 inches at mouth; 6 inches just below Keystone Lock; and zero above lock; due to freshets 4 to 5 feet at mouth; 12 to 15 feet just below Keystone Lock, and 2 to 7 feet above Keystone Lock. Estimated cost for new work (1954) is $1,080,000, exclusive of amount expended on previous projects and estimated cost (1954), $371,400 for widening and deepening channel between miles 50.06 and 72, Keystone Lock and Dam, which is inactive. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. For details see page 687, Annual Report Fiscal Year 1944. Terminal facilities. Small, privately-owned wharves are available at all towns along bayou; public landing is permitted without charge. There are privately-owned terminals for transferring crude oil to barges near towns of Charenton, Jeanerette, Oliver, and St. Martinville. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Hired labor continued operation and maintenance of Keystone Lock and facilities, condition and operation studies, and stream gaging. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated in 1891 and completed July 1928, except widening channel to bottom width of 80 feet from mile 50.06 to New Iberia, and to bottom width of 60 feet from New Iberia to Keystone Lock, which is inactive. For further details see Annual Report for 1966. 8. CALCASIEU RIVER AND PASS, LA. Location. Calcasieu River has its source in southwestern Louisiana, and flows southerly to the gulf. About 25 miles from the gulf it debouches into Calcasieu Lake, which is about 18 miles long. Connection between lake and gulf, about 7 miles long, is known as Calcasieu Pass. (See Geological Survey maps, Edna, Thompson Bluff, Hecker, Moss Bluff, Lake Charles, West Lake, Moss Lake, Hackberry, Sweet Lake, Brown's Lake, Holly Beach, Grand Bayou, and Cameron quadrangles; and NOAA Small-Craft Charts Nos. 11341 and 11348 of Intracoastal Waterway and NOAA Small-Craft Chart No. 11347 of Calcasieu River and Lake.) Previous project. For details see 1936 and 1938 Annual Reports, pages 719 and 819, respectively. Existing project. Provides for a channel 40 by 400 feet (35.9 miles long) from Lake Charles to sea end of jetties in Gulf of Mexico; an approach channel 42 by 800 feet from sea end of jetties to 42 feet deep in the gulf; extension of 35- by 250-foot channel from its present upsteam limit at mile 34 to vicinity of U.S. Highway 90 Bridge (mile 36.2); a 750- by 1,000-foot turning basin at upper end with a 35-foot depth; improvement of river from Lake Charles to Phillips Bluff (52.6 miles) by removing logs, snags, overhanging trees, and by dredging; maintenance of existing 12- by 200-foot channel in old channel of Calcasieu River at Cameron, La., which connects with project at mile 2.25; and reconstruction and extension of existing jetties initially to seaward end of east jetty, and further extension to 15-foot-depth contour if found advisable to reduce maintenance dredging costs. Improvement is 113.6 miles long. Normal range of tide is 10 inches at mouth, diminishing to zero at Phillips Bluff; extremes range from 14 inches to zero. Estimated cost for new work (July 1975) is $19,518,000 Federal, and $1,409,000 non-Federal. In addition, Coast Guard is to provide navigation aids at an estimated cost of $404,700. Local cooperation. Local interest furnished all rights-of-way and spoil-disposal areas for completed features. For construction and future maintenance of modification authorized by 1960 River and Harbor Act, local interests must furnish lands, rights-of-ways, and spoil-disposal areas: alter pipelines, cables, wharves, oil wells, and any other facilities and hold and save the United States free from damages. Assurances were accepted and right-of-entry was furnished for the modification. The local agency is presently finalizing transfer to the United States of the few remaining tracts with acceptable title evidence. Assurance Agency: Lake Charles Harbor and Terminal District. Terminal facilities. Facilities at Port of Lake Charles are owned by Lake Charles Harbor and Terminal District and operated by a board of commissioners. In addition to municipally-owned terminals, there are several privatelyowned and operated wharf structures on existing ship channel. (For further details, see Port Series No. 19, vol. 1, "Port St. Joe, Fla., Pensacola, Fla., Baton Rouge, La., Panama City, Fla., Pascagoula, Miss., Lake Charles, La., Gulfport, Miss.," revised 1957, and Folio of Navigation Maps Intracoastal Waterway, New Orleans to Port Arthur, 1968, 13th edition, published by the MRC.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Hired labor continued operation and maintenance of the saltwater barrier, stream gaging, and condition and operation studies. U.S. hopper dredges Langfitt, Goethals, and McFarland removed a combined total of 12,674,000 cubic yards from the Gulf Entrance Channel. Maintenance by contract: Dredging in the Bar Channel, stations 0+00 to 431+00, was completed Nov. 4, 1980, with a total of 10,843,628 cubic yards of material removed. One contract, mile 15.5 to mile 3.0 was completed Apr. 10, 1981, with a total of 6,417,750 cubic yards removed. Dredging at stations 1165+00 to 1200+00 and Devil's Elbow stations 2+72 to 151+67 began Aug. 14, 1981 and is 99 percent complete, with a total of 139 stations of dredging (100 linear feet each) completed. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction under the existing project was initiated in Fiscal Year 1939 and completed October 1968, except extension of the jetties to 15-foot-depth contour, which has been deferred until found advisable to accomplish same. Construction of modifications, described in Table 11-B, was as follows: Work authorized by Mar. 2, 1945, R&H Act was initiated in September 1948 and completed in June 1949; Work authorized by Jul. 24, 1946, FC Act was initiated in September 1948 and completed in April 1953; and Work authorized by Jul. 14, 1960, R&H Act was initiated in April 1962 and completed in October 1968. A turning basin or ship anchorage for vessels using waterway was constructed from April to June' 1952, between St. Johns Island and vicinity of Cameron, La., about 1.1 miles. Calcasieu Pass jetties, initiated under previous project and completed in May 1942, extended to 10-foot-depth contour. East jetty about 8,620 feet long, was built to about 6 feet above mean low gulf and extends seaward from existing gulf shoreline for 6,820 feet. West jetty, 8,050 feet long was built to about 4 feet above mean low gulf and extends seaward from existing gulf shoreline for 6,795 feet. 11-6 NEW ORLEANS, LA., DISTRICT 9. CALCASIEU RIVER AT DEVIL'S ELBOW, LA. Location. In southwest Louisiana on the east side of the Calcasieu River and Pass, La., project and about 12 miles south of Lake Charles. Existing project. Provides for a 40- by 400-foot channel extending a distance of about 2.8 miles, from the existing ship channel in Calcasieu River at mile 22.6 eastward through Devil's Elbow and in the land cut into the industrial park, and a turning basin at the head of the channel, 40 feet deep, 1,200 feet wide, and 1,400 feet long. Estimated cost for new work (July 1978) is $5,490,740 Federal and $798,000 non-Federal. In addition, Coast Guard is to provide navigation aids at an estimated cost of $68,000. Local cooperation. For details see page 11-9, Annual Report Fiscal Year 1980. Terminal facilities. There are public terminal facilities at the Port of Lake Charles, mile 34.0, of the Calcasieu River ship channel, including storage sheds, rail and highway service, and transfer equipment. Privately-owned industrial facilities along the channel have been developed, including a major tanker terminal (about mile 29) and a dock to serve the aluminum complex at the industrial park. Additional public facilities in the industrial park will be provided when needed. Operation and results during fiscal year. Hired labor work consisted of reconnaissance surveys and preparation of plans and specifications for dredging. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was completed in September 1978. 10. FRESHWATER BAYOU, LA. Location. In Vermilion Parish, La., between Atchafalaya and Calcasieu Rivers, from Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, mile 161.2 west of Harvey Lock, to 12-foot contour in Gulf of Mexico near Freshwater Bayou. Waterway is routed 22.6 miles along Schooner Bayou Cutoff, Schooner Bayou, Six Mile Canal, Belle Isle Canal, and Freshwater Bayou. (Refer to NOAA Small-Craft Chart No. 11350 of Intracoastal Waterway.) Existing project. Provides for dredging a new 12- by 125-foot channel from Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, mile 161.2 west of Harvey Lock, to 12-foot contour in Gulf of Mexico near Freshwater Bayou, construction of an 84- by 600-foot lock with a depth of 16 feet over sill near Gulf of Mexico; and construction of jetties from shoreline to 6-foot-depth contour in Gulf of Mexico, if maintenance dredging of channel without jetties proves to be more expensive than construction and maintenance of jetties. Until such determination has been made, offshore channel should be dredged and maintained to provide a 12- by 250-foot channel. In event jetties are provided, offshore section should then be maintained to 12- by 125-foot project in jettied reach, and 250 feet beyond. Existing project was completed in 1968, except for construction of jetties at a later date, if necessary. Estimated cost of construction of jetties (July 1971) is $3,118,100. Estimated total Federal cost is $10,400,000 (1971) and the total non-Federal cost for the existing project is $171,000. In addition, the Coast Guard is to provide navigational aids at an estimated cost of $19,100. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. For details see page 649, Annual Report Fiscal Year 1962. Terminal facilities. Extensive public and private terminal and transfer facilities do not exist in area, and none would be required for improved channel. Private terminals exist at site of oil and gas operations in area and sufficient private and public wharf facilties are along Gulf Intracoastal Waterway and its connecting waterways. Sites are available along proposed improvement for construction of any additional private and public terminals that might be requireu for utilization of channel. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance by hired labor consisted of operation and ordinary repairs to lock, condition and operation studies, reconnaissance surveys, water quality studies, and channel patrol. Maintenance dredging under one contract was completed Aug. 17, 1981, with the removal of 2,351,831 cubic yards of material from the channel between Freshwater Bayou Lock and the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated April 1963 and completed August 1968, except for construction of jetties at a later date, if required to reduce the cost of maintenance dredging. 11. GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN APALACHEE BAY, FLA., AND MEXICAN BORDER (NEW ORLEANS DIST.) Location. Section of Gulf Intracoastal Waterway within New Orleans District extends from Lake Borgne Light 29 near mouth of Rigolets, to Sabine River, La., and Tex. Section from Lake Borgne Light 29 to Mississippi River follows Rigolets and Lake Pontchartrain to lake end of State-owned Inner Harbor Navigation Canal, thence via this canal to Mississippi River, a distance of 40.5 miles. Public Law 675, 77th Cong., modified project to provide for a land cut through marsh from Rigolets to a point on Inner Harbor Navigation Canal about 22.5 miles from Mississippi River, eliminating passage throughLake Pontchartrain and five drawbridges, a distance of 30.8 miles to Mississippi River by this route. From Inner Harbor Navigation Canal to entrance of Harvey Lock, route follows Mississippi River for 5.5 miles. Section from Mississippi River to Atchafalaya River, La., leaves Mississippi River through Harvey Lock about 3.3 miles above Canal Street and follows Harvey Canal No. 1 and Bayou Barataria to Bayou Villars, a land cut south of Lake Salvador to Harvey Canal No. 2, Harvey Canal No. 2 to Larose, La., and a land cut to Houma, La., thence over a land cut south of Bayous Black and Cocodrie, thence through Bayou Cocodrie and a land cut to Bayou Black; thence through Bayous Black, Chene, and Boeuf to Atchafalaya River, about 0.5 mile south of Morgan City, La., a total of 95.5 miles. Alternative connection with Mississippi River near Algiers, La., about 10.3 miles below Harvey Lock, consisting of a lock and land cut about 9 miles long intersecting Intracoastal Waterway at about mile 6 is complete. An alternative route from Mississippi River follows Bayou Plaquemine passing Indian Village, La., and continuing on through lower Grand River to and through a lock at Bayou Sorrel in East Atchafalaya Basin protection levee, thence through levee borrow pit to Berwick Bay; and thence through Berwick Bay to Morgan City, La., a total of 56 miles. This alternative route was enlarged from vicinity of Morgan City to Indian Village, La., and extended from Indian Village, La., through Bayou Grosse Tete and a new land cut to and through a new terminal lock and entrance channel to Mississippi River near Port Allen, La., a total of 65 miles. Section from 11-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 Atchafalaya River to Vermilion River, La., begins at western end of Mississippi-Atchafalaya section and follows Atchafalaya River about 2.5 miles, portions of Little Wax Bayou, Possum Bayou, cutoffs, a land cut passing through North Bend Plantation to Bayou Bartholomew, Bayou Bartholomew to Little Bay, a land cut skirting north edge of Cote Blanche Island and west edge of Weeks Island to Vermilion River, about 24 miles below Abbeville, La., a total of about 63.6 miles. Franklin Canal, St. Mary Parish, La., extends southwesterly from Franklin, La., on Bayou Teche, for 5.5 miles to Bayou Portage, a section of "The Inland Waterway from Franklin to the Mermentau River, La.," and through bayou for 0.75 mile to Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, 121 miles west of Harvey Lock. Section from Vermilion River to Mermentau River, La., begins at western end of Atchafalaya-Vermilion section and follows Vermilion River 1.3 miles, a part of Schooner Bayou Cutoff canal, and a land cut running generally northwesterly to Mermentau River at a point about 0.5 mile above its entrance into Grand Lake and about 16 miles below town of Lake Arthur, La., a total of about 42.7 miles. Vermilion Lock was constructed about 1.75 miles west of Vermilion River to prevent ingress of saltwater from Vermilion Bay. Section from Mermentau River to Calcasieu River, La., begins at western end of Vermilion-Mermentau section and follows Mermentau River upstream for about 1.5 miles, a land cut running west-southwesterly to Lake Misere, passing north of lake and Bayou Misere, westerly to Sweet Lake, south and west of Sweet Lake, northwesterly to Bayou Tete Bois, through Bayou Tete Bois, Black Bayou, and cutoffs to a point on Calcasieu River about 16.6 miles below city of Lake Charles, La., a total of about 37.1 miles. Calcasieu Lock was constructed near intersection of Calcasieu River and Intracoastal Waterway, mile 238 west of Harvey Lock, Calcasieu Parish, about 16.6 miles below Lake Charles, La. Section from Calcasieu River to Sabine River, La. and Tex., begins at western end of Mermentau-Calcasieu section, and follows Calcasieu River upstream about 1.6 miles, a land cut running southwesterly 2.8 miles, thence west 22 miles to Sabine River at a point about 3 miles below Orange, Tex., a total of about 27.1 miles. (Refer to MRC alluvial valley map and Rigolets, Chef Menteur, St. Bernard, New Orleans, Barataria, Baton Rouge, Grosse Tete, Chicot Lake, Foster, Napoleonville, Morgan City, Belle Isle, Bayou Sale, Jeanerette, and Derouen quadrangles; Geological Survey maps, Cutoff, Houma, Gibson, Abbeville, Forked Island, Grand Lake East, Grand Lake West, Lake Charles, Sulphur, and Orange quadrangles; and NOAA Small-Craft Charts of Intracoastal Waterway, gulf section, Galveston Bay, Tex., to Waveland, Miss.) Previous projects. For details see page 544 of 1963 Annual Report. Existing project. Provides for a waterway, within the district, from Lake Borgne to Sabine River by the following improvements; a channel 16 feet deep and 150 feet wide, from Mississippi River to Atchafalaya River, except in vicinity of Houma, miles 50.5 to 63.5, which is to be maintained at 12 by 125 feet; a channel 16 by 150 feet through bypass route around Houma, La., miles 50.5 to 63.5, and through alternative connection in Mississippi River below Algiers, La., about 9 miles long, a channel 16 by 200 feet from Atchafalaya River to Sabine River; a channel 12 by 150 feet in section between Lake Borgne Light 29 and New Orleans (via land cut through marsh and Inner Harbor Navigation Canal), 33.1 miles long; an alternative route 9 feet deep and 100 feet wide between Lake Borgne Light 29 and New Orleans (via Rigolets, Lake Pontchartrain, and Inner Harbor Navigation Canal), 40.5 miles long; a channel 12 feet deep and 125 feet wide for Plaquemine-Morgan City alternative route from Mississippi- Atchafalaya section of waterway, in vicinity of Morgan City, through lower Atchafalaya River (Berwick Bay) and borrow pit of East Atchafalaya protection levee to and through Bayou Sorrel Lock which was constructed under existing project "Flood Contol, Mississippi River and Tributaries," thence through Lower Grand River to Indian Village, and thence by way of Bayou Grosse Tete and a new land cut to and through a new terminal lock and entrance channel to Mississippi River near Port Allen, La., opposite lower limit of Port Baton Rouge; a channel 9 feet deep and 100 feet wide from Indian Village on Plaquemine-Morgan City alternative route through Bayou Plaquemine and Plaquemine Lock to Mississippi River at Plaquemine, La., improvement of Franklin Canal as a connecting channel from Gulf Intracoastal Waterway (mile 121) to Franklin, La., to afford a channel 8 feet deep and generally 60 feet wide with a width of 100 feet in its upper 300 feet; and a saltwater guard lock (Calcasieu Lock) in waterway at mile 238 west of Harvey Lock. Project also provides for: widening at bends; passing places, mooring basins; locks or guard locks; such railroad bridges over artificial cuts as are necessary; purchase of pipeline dredge; construction and operation of new drainage canals and pumping facilities to restore parish drainage systems where intercepted; construction of movable bridges at Missouri Pacific Railroad and State Highways 31 and 996 (in lieu of State Highway Bridge 31, a tunnel was constructed, and additional cost over estimated cost of bridge was borne by local interest); fixed-trestle bridges for crossing proposed landside drainage canals; lift bridges at Louisiana Highway 168, Port Allen, La., at Texas & Pacific Railway, Port Alen, La., and at Texas & Pacific Railway, Morley, La.; and for annual payments to Board of Commissioners of Port of New Orleans for use of a portion of Inner Harbor Navigation Canal. Length of waterway within district is 384.1 miles via northerly or Port Allen route, and 299.4 miles via southerly or Harvey Canal route. Normal range of tide, 10 inches; extreme range, 14 inches. A severe storm may cause a high tide of from 6 to 9 feet. Estimated cost for new work, exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects, is $157,833,827 Federal and $27,535,000 non-Federal, divided as follows; Algiers Lock and canal, completed June 1961, $15,895,924 Federal and $2,185,000 non-Federal; Plaquemine-Morgan City route, completed October 1963, $26,869,372 Federal and $2,250,000 non-Federal; and remainder of waterway (October 1980), $115,068,531 Federal and $23,100,000 non-Federal, including $73,700,000 Federal and $21,500,000 non-Federal for modification (authorized by Public Law 87-874), October 1962. In addition, the Coast Guard is to provide navigation aids at an estimated cost of $32,000. Construction of bulkheads and jetties at Lake Borgne and Chef Menteur, La., is considered inactive and excluded from foregoing cost estimate. Estimated cost (1956) of this item is $440,000. Construction of a double-leaf bascule, four-lane highway bridge provided for under this project has become unnecessary because portion of project over which bridge was to be constructed was incorporated in project "Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet" which provides for a larger bridge. Bayou Sorrel and Bayou Boeuf Locks were constructed and are being maintained and operated with "Flood Control, Mississippi River and Tributairies" funds. Therefore, construction, maintenance, and operation costs are not included in approved estimates referred to heretofore. 11-8 NEW ORLEANS, LA., DISTRICT (See Table 11-D for locks on Gulf Intracoastal Waterway in New Orleans District.) Local cooperation. Algiers Lock and Canal: All assurances required for construction were furnished. Local agency has failed to convey all fee and easement tracts with acceptable title evidence to the United States. However, authority has been received to accept the interests conveyed as best available from local agency with the understanding that the United States rely upon assurances of local cooperation should any claims against the United States occur as a result of failure of local agency to complete transfer of title. Plaquemine-Morgan City alternative route: All assurances required for construction were furnished. Title by United States has been acquired to all but 35 tracts, for which local agency failed to comply fully with curative requirements in title certificate. Authority was given to accept the tracts conveyed as best available from local interests and to rely upon assurances of local cooperation furnished by local agency should any claims against the United States occur as a result of failure of local agency to complete transfer of title. Louisiana Office of Public Works has furnished assurances for maintenance and improvement. Modification authorized by River and Harbor Act of 1962: Local interests must furnish lands, rights-of-way, and spoildisposal areas for enlargement and future maintenance of project, make alterations to utilities; construct, maintain, and operate all bridges desired in connection with bypass channel around Houma, La., and hold the United States free from damages. Assurances were requested in April 1963; however, none of the 11 local agencies involved has furnished assurances requested. Main objection to participation is requirement that local interests be responsible for alteration of utilities. Replacement of Vermilion Lock: The Vermilion Parish Police Jury was requested to execute an Agreement of Local Cooperation on Oct. 26, 1972, agreeing to provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way required for construction and subsequent maintenance of the replacement lock and approach channels thereto, and hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction and maintenance of the project, including erosion of the channel beyond the rights-of-way furnished for the replacement lock and the approach channels thereto and comply with the provisions of Public Law 91-646 and Sec. 221 of Public Law 91-611. They furnished formal assurances covering all requirements of local cooperation, including Public Law 91-611 and Public Law 91-646, on Mar. 19, 1975. These assurances were in the process of being accepted by the United States, when the Water Resources Development Act of 1976 was enacted authorizing the 110-foot-wide lock. The assurances were executed by the Police Jury on Dec. 6, 1976, and were accepted by the District Engineer on behalf of the United States on Feb. 8, 1977. The Acting Director of Real Estate for the Secretary of the Army approved the assurances on Jul. 5, 1977. Terminal facilities. Large terminal and transfer facilities, suitable for receiving and shipping commodities by barge, are available at principal cities in Louisiana; namely, New Orleans, Baton Rouge, Harvey, Morgan City, and Lake Charles. Facilities at New Orleans are on Inner Harbor Navigation Canal. Canal and facilities were leased from Board of Commissioners, Port of New Orleans, Apr. 1, 1944, and are now operated by the United States, toll free, 24 hours per day. At Morgan City, on Atchafalaya River, there are two large and three small wharves open to all without charge. Otherwise, facilities are confined to privately-owned piers, wharves, or oil docks. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance by hired labor: Real estate activities, condition and ope:rtion studies, condition surveys, stream gaging, and channel patrol. Locks, bridges, and waterways were operated and maintained. Fender systems were repaired at Algiers, Calcasieu, Harvey, Port Allen, and Vermilion Locks. Work by hired labor consisted of major repairs to the Algiers Lock. Miscellaneous repairs were made to the Florida Avenue Bridge, Vermilion, Harvey, and Port Allen Locks. Maintenance by contract: Dredging under two contracts included removing 478,539 cubic yards of shoal in Port Allen Lock forebay and below Bayou Sorrel Lock was completed Dec. 17, 1980. Dredge operations in the New Orleans Harbor included removing 316,345 cubic yards of material. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated July 1929 and project, as modified, is 55 percent complete. For information on completion of segments of waterway, see 1965 Annual Report, pages 523 and 524. Work remaining to complete the project consists of enlarging waterway as provided by 1962 River and Harbor Act, and replacement of Vermilion Lock. Construction of bulkheads at Lake Borgne and Chef Menteur are inactive features as this work has not been necessary. President Carter, as a result of his review of water resource projects in April 1977, changed the site of the proposed new shiplock to the Industrial Canal in Orleans Parish and recommended that the existing lock be replaced and expanded at the existing site. This is a new concept and requires reinstitution of General Design planning with attendant slips in the schedule components. 12. HOUMA NAVIGATION CANAL, LA. Location. Extends from Gulf Intracoastal Waterway at mile 59.5 west of Harvey Lock southerly about 16 miles, thence southeasterly 10.5 miles to Terrebonne Bay, and 9.5 miles across bay to deep water in Cat Island Pass. At mile 11.3 above Cat Island Pass, Houma Navigation Canal crosses Bayou Petit Caillou, and 20 miles above Cat Island Pass it crosses Bayou Grand Caillou. No other major waterways are crossed by Houma Navigation Canal. (See Army Engineer and Geological Survey quadrangle maps, NOAA Nos. 11352 and 11340 Sailing Charts; and NOAA Nos. 11357 and 11356 Small-Craft Charts on the Intracoastal Waterway. Existing project. Provides that United States assume maintenance and operation of Houma Navigation Canal, constructed by Parish of Terrebonne, to dimensions of 15 by 150 feet. Normal range of tide is 10 inches at mouth and 4 inches at Houma; extreme range is 14 inches at mouth and 6 inches at Houma; wind and tide, 1 to 3 feet at mouth; flood, 3 to 4 feet in upper section. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. For details see page 11-13, Annual Report Fiscal Year 1980. Terminal facilities. Privately-owned and operated facilities are adequate for existing commerce which is mainly seafood plants; oil companies and oil company supplies; sugar refining; and marine repair shops and towing. Southern 11-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 Pacific Lines has dock facilities in Houma, La. Ample space exists for expansion of existing facilities, or for the construction of new wharves and appurtenances. Operations and results during fiscal year. Hired labor work consisted of reconnaissance surveys, stream gaging, and condition and operation studies. Maintenance dredging under contract, stations, 1378+00 to 1925+00, began Jan. 22, and completed May 7, 1980, with a total of 2,475,799 cubic yards of material removed. Condition as of Sep. 30. Maintenance by the United States commenced in November 1964. 13. MERMENTAU RIVER, LA. Location. Work covered by this project is 35 to 70 miles southeast of Lake Charles, La., along lower Mermentau River below Grand Lake, mile 25, to Gulf of Mexico; Inland Waterway from Vermilion Bay to White Lake, White Lake to Grand Lake, and from Schooner Bayou to Intracoastal Waterway-Gulf section (Schooner Bayou Cutoff); North Prong of Schooner Bayou; and waterway from White Lake to Pecan Island, La., and artificial canal, extending from 5-foot-depth contour in White Lake, almost due south for about 1.8 miles to Pecan Island. (Refer to Coast Charts Nos. 11344 and 11349, NOAA Small-Craft Chart No. 11348 on the Intracoastal Waterway, Geological Survey maps, Sweet Lake, Hog Bayou, Grand Lake West, Grand Lake East, Constance Bayou, Forked Island, Pecan Island, and Abbeville quadrangles.) Existing project. Flood control, navigation, irrigation, and salinity control in coastal marsh of lower Mermentau River Basin and channel enlargement of lower Mermentau River below Grand Lake, mile 25, to a minimum section of 3,000 square feet below mean low gulf level for discharge of flood flows; construction of a sector-gated control structure at Catfish Point, mile 24 above mouth of Mermentau River, for discharge of flood flows and control of tidal flows and saltwater intrusion in Mermentau River; channel enlargement and realinement of Inland Waterway from Vermilion Bay to White Lake, 12.04 miles, and from White Lake to Grand Lake, 6.14 miles, to a minimum section of 3,000 square feet below mean low gulf level or interflow between lakes and discharge of flood flows; construction of a sector-gated control structure in enlarged channel immediately north of abandoned Schooner Bayou Lock reservation for discharge of flood flows and control of tidal flows and saltwater intrusion; channel enlargement of North Prong of Schooner Bayou and Schooner Bayou Cutoff, 6.69 miles, to 6 by 60 feet, mean low gulf level, for navigation purposes; and maintenance of existing 5- by 40- foot, mean low gulf level, waterway from White Lake to Pecan Island, La., 1.8 miles long, for navigation. In addition, project provides for incorporation of that section of project, "Inland Waterway from Franklin, La., to Mermentau River," west of Vermilion Bay, a waterway that includes Schooner Bayou Lock. Project was reclassified as an "Operation and Maintenance, General" project under category, "Navigation (Locks, Dams, Reservoirs, and Canals)" by authority of Chief of Engineers, Apr. 23, 1956. Because of failure of both east and west gates, Schooner Bayou Lock was closed by a dike across east approach channel and traffic routed through new control structure. Under ordinary conditions mean range of tide on Mermentau River near mouth is 1.6 feet and near head about 3 inches. Variation of water surface near the mouth may be as much as 7 or 8 feet, due to hurricanes on the gulf, and near head from 8 to 12 feet, due to freshets. New work was completed in 1956. Estimated cost for new work (October 1980) is $5,350,000 Federal and $471,000 non-Federal, including $190,000 contributed funds. In addition, Coast Guard is to provide navigation aids at an estimated cost of $51,000. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. For details see page 1022, Annual Report Fiscal Year 1948. Terminal facilities. Privately-owned and operated facilities are adequate along the Mermentau River and Bayous Nezpique and des Cannes for the principal commodities transported, which are petroleum and its products. A public wharf is located at Lake Arthur, La., but due to insufficient use it has not been maintained and in its present condition is not usable. Sites for future expansion of these facilities are available and will be provided by non-Federal interests as required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Hired labor continued operation and maintenance of Schooner Bayou and Catfish Point Control Structures, condition and operation studies, reconnaissance surveys, channel patrol, and water quality studies. Other work by hired labor forces during the fiscal year: Catfish Point Control Structures; construction of a new boat landing, placement of 2,400 tons of stone in needed areas, and maintenance repairs to the guidewalls. Schooner Bayou Control Structure; dredging in the boat slip and old lock channel with removal of 2,000 cubic yards of material. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction of project began April 1947 and completed July 1952. New work dredging was accomplished from April 1947 to June 1952. Catfish Point Control Structure was constructed from November 1948 to August 1951. Reservation comprises 9.7 acres. Schooner Bayou Lock and Control Structures: Schooner Bayou Lock and Dam were completed in 1913 and 1914, respectively, and the Lockmaster's house in 1917. Lock was closed to navigation May 7, 1951, and abandoned by authority of Chief of Engineers on Oct. 9, 1951. Permanent closure of lock channel and tie-in dikes was completed September 1951. Construction of control structures was accomplished from August 1949 to May 1951. Reservation comprises 6.9 acres. 14. MISSISSIPPI RIVER, BATON ROUGE TO GULF OF MEXICO, LA. Location. This reach of the river flows southeasterly through southeastern portion of Louisiana. At Head of Passes, approximately 233.1 miles below Louisiana Highway Commission bridge at Baton Rouge, river branches into three main passes: Southwest Pass, South Pass, and Pass a Loutre, two of which, Southwest Pass and South Pass, are improved under existing project. Head of Passes to mouths of Southwest and South Passes are 20.1 and 13.5 miles, respectively. Mouth of Southwest Pass is 141 miles west of Mobile, Ala., and 349 miles east of Galveston, Tex. Mouth of South Pass is 18.5 miles northeast of mouth of Southwest Pass. (Refer to NOAA Coast Charts Nos. 11361, 11364, and 11369; MRC alluvial valley map, and Zachary, Baton Rouge, White Castle, Donaldsonville, Thibodaux, Mount Airy, Bonnet Carre, Hahnville, New Orleans, St. Bernard, Barataria, Pointe a la Hache, Black Bay, Empire, Forts, West Delta, East Delta, and Southwest Pass quadrangles and 1980 (48th edition) folio of flood control 11-10 NEW ORLEANS, LA., DISTRICT and navigation maps, Mississippi River, Cairo, Ill., to Gulf of Mexico, La., published by the MRC.) Previous projects. For details see page 552 of Annual Report for 1963. Existing project. Provides for channel dimensions as follows: Between a line one-tenth mile below Louisiana Highway Commission bridge at Baton Rouge 129.3 miles to upper port limits of New Orleans, 40 by 500 feet mean low water; within limits of port of New Orleans, where that authority has jurisdiction over both banks of river, a distance of 17.8 miles, 35 by 1,500 feet, measured from a line generally 100 feet from face of left bank wharves, but not closer than 100 feet to wharves on right bank; within 35- by 1,500-foot channel in port limits of New Orleans, 40 by 500 feet; from lower limits of port of New Orleans 86.7 miles to Head of Passes, 40 by 1,000 feet; Southwest Pass, 17.5 miles from Head of Passes to jetty channel, 40 by 800 feet; 4.1 miles in the Southwest Pass bar and jetty channel, 40 by 600 feet; South Pass from Head of Passes to outer ends ofjetties, 13.5 miles, 30 by 450 feet; and 1.2 miles in the South Pass bar channel, 30 by 600 feet. Plane of reference through New Orleans and below is mean low gulf. Plane of reference above New Orleans is low water reference plane. General plan of improvement of Southwest Pass provides for constructing pass to uniform cross section with about 1,420-foot surface width by means of jetties, spur dikes, and bulkheads; for channel maintenance by dredging from Cubits Gap, mile 3.5 AHP through the gulf entrance channel, mile 21.5 BHP; for construction of small revetted openings through narrow portions of banks of pass for purpose of strengthening and nourishment of banks; for closure of minor outlets not required for maintenance of banks; for construction of sills to prevent enlargement of the Venice Jump and Cubits Gap; for repairs to sill across Pass a Loutre and bank revetment at Head of Passes; for construction of dikes with a view to reducing width of river above Head of Passes; for construction of a submerged deflecting dike above Head of Passes; and for other minor work. East jetty is about 24,950 feet long and west jetty 19,699 feet. Jetties are composed of a substructure of brush mattresses, orginally built to about elevation of mean low gulf, surmounted with a superstructure of concrete blocks and large riprap and/or stone rubble mound of core and cover stone. Spur dikes are composed of cribwork of round piling filled with willows and stone, or with a curtain of round piles along upstream face. General plan of improvement of South Pass provides for construction and maintenance of jetties and spur dikes; for channel maintenance by dredging from Head of Passes through the Gulf Entrance Channel beyond mile 13.5 BHP; maintenance of a sill across Pass a Loutre, and for seaward extension of east jetty at mouth of pass; removal of west dike and construction of spur dikes and bank revetment at Head of Passes; removal of false point at head of South Pass to bottom elevation of minus 45 feet and revetment of new bank line and construction and maintenance of east and west headland structure at Head of Passes. East jetty foundation is 12, 070 feet long; inner east jetty is 11,170 feet long; west jetty is 7,820 feet long; and inner west jetty is 4,710 feet long. Jetties are composed of a substructure of brush mattresses surmounted by a superstructure of stone and/or concrete blocks and large riprap. Spur dikes are composed of cribwork of round piling filled with willows and stone. Plane of reference is mean low gulf. Variation of water surface is 16 inches at mouths and 10 inches at head of the passes, due to tides. Extreme range of tides at mouths of passes due to hurricanes in about 10 feet. At New Orleans extreme range of water surface is about 20 feet due to floods. At Baton Rouge extreme range is about 45 feet due to floods. Estimated cost of existing project (October 1981) is $161,000,000 Federal. In addition, Coast Guard is to provide navigation aids at an estimated cost of $29,000. Local cooperation. None required, except for modification of project in connection with Mississippi River-Gulf Gatlet, which is reported separately. Terminal facilities. Piers, wharves, or docks serve the Port of New Orleans. Most wharves on east or left bank parallel riverbank forming nearly a continuous covered quay about 10 miles long. Public wharves controlled by Board of Commissioners, Port of New Orleans (the Dock Board), cover 62 percent of improved waterfront. These facilities include a shipside grain elevator, general cargo and cotton wharves, fruit landings, bunkering facilities, terminal warehouses, railroad terminals, marine railways, and drydocks. (For further details see Port Series No. 20, "The Port of New Orleans, La." revised 1977.) A foreign trade zone is located in Port of New Orleans. City of Baton Rouge has a reinforced concrete dock for deep-sea vessels with mechanical-handling facility. Attached to downstream end of wharf is a floating wharf boat 231 by 40.5 feet, of 2,000-ton capacity. Facilities are served by a transfer boat and municipal terminal having a capacity of 40 cars per day. Private terminals for handling oil, grain, bauxite ore, and other products are at points on both sides of river between New Orleans and Baton Rouge. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (For further details, see "Port Facilities" included in "Flood Damage Prevention and Navigation Maps of the Mississippi River, Cairo, Ill., to the Gulf of Mexico, La.," published annually by the MRC, and Port Series No. 19, vol. 1, "Port St. Joe, Fla., Pensacola, Fla., Baton Rouge, La., and Lake Charles, La.," revised 1979.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New work by hired labor continued on preparation of a supplement to the GDM. It is tentatively scheduled for completion in July 1983. Maintenance: (a) Baton Rouge to New Orleans: The U.S. dustpan dredge Jadwin and hopper dredge Langfitt removed 1,605,000 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $1,013,000. (b) New Orleans Harbor: One leased dredge contract removed 803,000 cubic yards of material at a cost of $699,600. (c) Head of Passes and Southwest Pass: The U.S. Hopper dredges Langfitt, McFarland and Goethals, removed 1,987,000 cubic yards of material from the lower jetty and bar channels and head of passes at a cost of $2,772,000. Two cutterhead dredges, under two unit price contracts, removed 5,130,000 cubic yards between mile 1.0 AHP and mile 18.8 BHP at a cost of $5,197,000. (d) Southwest Pass: Work under two contracts was completed as follows: Contract for repairs to permeable pile dikes from miles 10.78R to 20.14R was completed Apr. 30, 1981 at a cost of $13,426,600; repairs to foreshore rock dikes on both banks between miles 0.00 and 10.00 was completed Apr. 30, 1981 at a cost of $1,387,900. (e) Southwest Pass: Hired labor repairs were made to pile dike structures at a cost of $205,200. (f) Langfitt wharf: Repairs made to wharf at a cost of $130,800. 11-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 (g) Other items of expense were: Condition surveys, Passes, $671,000; reconnaissance surveys, $169,500; supervision and administration, $484,000; engineering and design, $165,000, and water control management, $520,000. Condition as of Sep. 30. The existing project is 38 percent complete. Deepening Southwest Pass to 40 feet mean low gulf, as authorized by the modification of Mar. 2, 1945, was completed in September 1963. Deepening the channel to 40 feet mean low water from Baton Rouge to New Orleans and to 40 feet mean low gulf in New Orleans Harbor, as authorized by the modifications of Oct. 23, 1962, was completed in August 1963. Work on the permeable pile dikes from mile 1.8 to 2.8 on east bank has been placed in a deferred status. Contract for the repairs to foreshore rock pile dikes from mile 1.95R to 16.13R was initiated Jul. 30, 1981. 15. MISSISSIPPI RIVER-GULF OUTLET, LA. Location. In State of Louisiana and extends from existing Inner Harbor Navigation Canal at a point 7,500 feet north of existing lock and about 11,000 feet from Mississippi River, to a turning basin south of Michoud, La., and then as a land and water cut from turning basin south of Michoud, La., southeasterly to and along south shore of Lake Borgne and through marshes to and through Chandeleur Sound to 38-foot contour in Gulf of Mexico. (Refer to NOAA Coast Charts Nos. 11340, 11360, 11363, 11369, 11371, and 11373. Also see MRC 1980 (48th edition) folio of maps, Mississippi River-Cairo, Ill., to Gulf of Mexico, La.) Existing project. Provides for a seaway canal, 36 by 500 feet, extending 76 miles as a land and water cut from Michoud southeasterly to and along south shore of Lake Borgne, and across Chandeleur Sound to Chandeleur Island and increasing gradually to 38 by 600 feet in Gulf of Mexico, with protective jetties at entrance, a permanent retention dike through Chandeleur Sound, and a wing dike along islands as required. It also provides for an inner tidewater harbor consisting of 1,000- by 2,000-foot turning basin 36 feet deep at landward end of seaway canal, and a connecting channel 36 by 500 feet wide extending westerly along Gulf Intracoastal Waterway from turning basin to Inner Harbor Navigation Canal, including construction of a suitable highway bridge with approaches to carry Louisiana State Highway 47 (formerly 61) over channel. Plan further provides for future construction of a channel and lock in the vicinity of Meraux to furnish an additional connection between tidewater harbor and Mississippi River. Estimated cost for new work (October 1981) is $457,000,000 Federal and $189,000,000 non-Federal, including cash contribution of $82,000,000. This does not include modification for Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet, Michoud Canal, which is reported separately. Local cooperation. Original assurances furnished and accepted. Local agency has furnished Supplemental Assurance covering Public Law 91-646. Rights-of-entry for entire project were furnished by local agency which is in process of actively conveying to the United States title to remaining tracts. Supplemental assurances reflecting the changes made necessary by enactment of the Water Resources Development Act of 1976 were requested on Jan. 12, 1977. The Board of Commissioners of the Port of New Orleans, by letter dated Sep. 18, 1978, stated that they are unable to provide the required supplemental assurances at this time. They are concerned about the possible effects of the proposed new Inner Harbor Navigation Canal Lock on this project and pending legislation concerning local assurances for the Inner Harbor Navigation Canal project. Local interests have provided right of entry for construction for the Baptiste Collette Bayou portion of this project. Terminal facilities. The only facility on the waterway is the Public Bulk Terminal of New Orleans constructed by Board of Commissioners, Port of New Orleans, on left descending bank at mile 63. Two new-container ship berths have begun operation at the Industrial Canal end of the seaway. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work by hired labor: Engineering environmental and economic studies, stream gaging, surveys, and field investigations continued. Maintenance by hired labor: The hopper dredge Langfitt removed intermittently a total of 1,756,000 cubic yards of material from the Gulf Entrance Channel during the period Mar. 8 through Apr. 20, 1980. Maintenance dredging under one contract for the Bayou Dupre Control Structure was initiated Dec. 27, 1980 and was completed Feb. 9, 1981. Two contract dredges removed 10,384,000 cubic yards from Breton Sound. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated March 1958 and entire project is 75 percent complete. The channel was opened to navigation Jul. 25, 1963, and completed Jan. 20, 1968. Paris Road Bridge was opened to traffic Jul. 21, and completed Nov. 14, 1967. Approximately 3 miles of first- and second-lift stone dikes have been constructed on north side of channel and approximately 8.27 miles of first-lift and 7.34 miles of second-lift stone dikes have been constructed on south side of channel in Breton Sound. Principal work required to complete project is construction of new ship lock, raising and extending dikes, and construction of foreshore protection. The site for the lock remained the major problem. President Carter, as a result of his review of water resource projects in April 1977, changed the site for the proposed shiplock to the Industrial Canal in Orleans Parish and recommended that, if justified, the existing lock should be replaced and expanded in place and that care should be taken to minimize dislocation of residents living adjacent to the site. These recommendations are being addressed in a Phase I GDM scheduled for completion in February 1983. 16. MISSISSIPPI RIVER OUTLETS, VENICE, LA. Location. In the coastal marsh area and in the vicinity of the Mississippi River at about miles 10 to 11 above the Head of Passes. (Refer to NOAA Coast Chart No. 1361.) Existing project. Provides for additional navigation outlets in the vicinity of Venice, La., by enlargement of the existing channels of Baptiste Collette Bayou and Grand-Tiger Passes to 14 by 150 feet with entrance channels in open water 16 by 250 feet and jetties to the 6-foot-depth contour, if and when justified, to reduce cost of maintenance dredging. Estimated cost of new work (October 1981) is $12,000,000 Federal and $1,512,000 non-Federal. In addition, Coast Guard is to provide navigation aids at an estimated cost of $120,000. Local cooperation. For details see page 11-17, Annual Report, Fiscal Year 1980. Assuring Agency: Plaquemines Parish Commission Council. Basic assurances for the project have been furnished. Amended assurances covering Public Laws 91-646 and 91-611 were received on Aug. 5, 1977. 11-12 NEW ORLEANS, LA., DISTRICT Terminal facilities. In the Venice area, each operator of a construction, repair, or supply facility provides dock and transfer facilities to meet his own needs or arranges to use those of another. These facilities are considered adequate for the anticipated traffic. If new industry or supply facilities are established, they would provide any needed terminal facilities for their use. Ample areas for future expansion are available. Operations and results during fiscal year. Hired labor work consisted of reconnaisance surveys, condition and operation, stream gaging and engineering studies. Contract work for maintenance dredging at Baptiste Collette Bar Channel, began Dec. 1, 1979 and completed Jan. 4, 1980, with a total of 830,484 cubic yards of material removed. Condition as of Sep. 30. The project is 87 percent complete. 17. OVERTON-RED RIVER WATERWAY, LA. Location. In the State of Louisiana between junction of the Old and Mississippi Rivers and Shreveport, La., along the Old and Red Rivers, through land cuts and natural channels on the south bank of Red River. (Refer to Geological Survey State maps and the MRC alluvial valley quadrangle maps.) Existing project. Provides for a navigation route from the Mississippi River at its junction with Old River, through Old River to mile 31 of the Red River; developing a channel about 31 miles long, 200 feet wide, and 9 feet deep. Improvements consist of revetments, dikes, and dredging designed to preserve favorable and correct unfavorable channel alinement and depth. In addition to the existing project, the authorized work included a navigation route from mile 31 of the Red River to Shreveport, La., via a lateral canal excavated along the south bank of the Red River. However, the portion of the authorized project above mile 31 was reclassified to inactive status as approved by Office of the Chief of Engineers, letter dated Oct. 18, 1971. Estimated cost for new work (lower 31 miles only) (October 1980) is $27,200,000 Federal and $110,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. For details see page 11-18, Annual Report Fiscal Year 1980. Terminal facilities. None. Will be furnished if necessary. Operations and results during fiscal year. Hired labor work consisted of investigations, and surveys. Dredging under one contract included removing 43,311 cubic yards of material in Grand Lake revetment during the period Dec. 6 and Dec. 8, 1980. Contract work for stone bank paving, initiated Dec. 18, 1980 and completed Feb. 14, 1981, with placement of 49,926 tons of stone at Grand Lake revetment and 6,602 tons at Blakewood Lake. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction of the lower 31 miles was initiated Nov. 12, 1968, and is 78 percent complete with 61,658 linear feet of bank protected. 18. PETIT ANSE, TIGRE, AND CARLIN BAYOUS, LA. Location. The project is located in the coastal area of south central Louisiana, in Iberia and Vermilion Parishes, about 22 miles south of Lafayette, La. The plan of improvement involves replacement of the railroad bridge over Bayou Carlin and enlargement of Bayou Petit Anse from the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway to the Avery Island salt mine canal and Bayou Carlin from its mouth to Lake Peigneur to 12 by 125 feet, except through the developed area of Delcambre where the bottom width will be 80 feet. The replacement railroad bridge will provide a minimum horizontal clearance of 80 feet and vertical clearance of about 73 feet. The restrictive highway bridge at Delcambre will be replaced by the Louisiana Department of Highways. The new replacement bridge will provide the same clearance as the railroad bridge. Existing project. Provides for a harbor of refuge at Delcambre, dredging a channel in Bayou Petit Anse 9 feet deep and 80 feet wide from Intracoastal Waterway to north end of Avery Island; a channel 7 feet deep and 60 feet wide from Intracoastal Waterway via McIlhenny Canal (Avery Canal) to deep water in Vermilion Bay; and a channel 9 feet deep over a bottom width of 80 feet in Bayou Carlin from Bayou Petit Anse to Lake Peigneur. Total length of improvement is 16.1 miles. Under ordinary conditions mean range of tide is about 10 inches. All work under existing project was completed in 1962 at a cost of $344,389. In addition, $47,858 was expended from public works funds. Estimated cost of new work (October 1980) is $3,830,000 Federal and $2,080,000 non-Federal, including cash contribution of $240,000. Local cooperation. For details see page 11-18, Annual Report for 1980. A constitutional amendment was provided by the Louisiana legislature on Feb. 1, 1972, allowing local interests to comply. No cost to local interest is anticipated. Formal assurances have not been requested. When formal acts of assurances are requested, the provisions of PL 91-611 and PL 91-646 will be included as a requirement of those assurances. On Sep. 22, 1978 the Police Jury of Iberia Parish provided an oral expression of their intent to provide the required assurances of local cooperation. No action has been taken to secure clearances for relocations at this time. Termninal facilities. There is a large oil terminal at head of improvement on Bayou Petit Anse and several private docks and crane hoists. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preparation of the GDM, Phase I, was initiated and is scheduled for completion in 1982. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction has not begun. 19. RED RIVER EMERGENCY BANK PROTECTION Location. In northwest Louisiana, southwest Arkansas, and northeast Texas, along the Red and Old Rivers between the Mississippi River and the head of the levee system above Index, Tex. Existing project. Provides for realining the banks by means of cutoffs and training works and for stabilizing banks by means of revetments, dikes, and other methods as emergency conditions may require in advance of developing the design for the entire Red River Waterway project. Estimated cost for new work (October 1981) is $58,900,000 Federal and $2,420,000 non-Federal, including cash contribution of $24,000. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. For details see pages 11-19 to 11-20, Annual Report Fiscal Year 1980. Operations and results during fiscal year. Work by hired labor consisted of preparing plans and specifications, surveys, 11-13 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 and general engineering. Work continued from last fiscal year and was completed on four contracts: Bank stabilization at Hosston, La., mile 318.5R, completed Aug. 20, 1980; Field Ark., mile 362.0L, completed Aug. 4, 1980; Kenny, Ark., mile 374.0, completed Apr. 6, 1981; and bank stabilization and realinement at Mays Lake, Ark., mile 377 to 381.5, completed Jul. 9, 1981. Contract work began at four locations: Clear Lake, Ark., mile 386L, awarded Sep. 18, 1981, work not initiated; Young, Ark., mile 411L, initiated Jul. 29, 1981, 20 percent complete; Spring Bank, Ark., mile 335.5L, initiated Apr. 13, 1981, 90 percent complete; and Dukedale, La., mile 290L, initiated May 22, 1981, 39 percent complete. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated in October 1972 and is 75 percent complete. 20. RED RIVER WATERWAY- MISSISSIPPI RIVER TO SHREVEPORT, LA. Location. From east central to northwest Louisiana along the Red and Old Rivers between the Mississippi River and Shreveport, La. Existing project. Provide a navigation route from the Mississippi River at the junction with Old River via Old and Red River to Shreveport, La., developing a channel approximately 210 miles long, 9 feet deep, and 200 feet wide. The development will include five locks and dams, realinement and contraction of the river as necessary to develop an efficient channel, and bank stabilization as necessary to hold the newly developed channel in position. Facilities to provide opportunities for recreation and for fish and wildlife development are an integral part of the project. Estimated cost for new work (October 1981) is $1,404,000,000 Federal and $66,300,000 non-Federal, including $32,100,000 contributed funds. The Federal cost excludes $4,132,000 for aids to navigation by U.S. Coast Guard. Local cooperation. For details see page 11-21, Annual Report Fiscal Year 1980. The Red River Waterway Commission, governing body of the Red River Waterway District, executed an act of assurance for all project features in Louisiana on Feb. 26, 1969, supported by resolution dated Jan. 30, 1969. The assurances were accepted for and on behalf of the United States on Apr. 15, 1969. The Commission furnished amended assurances covering the provisions of PL 91-646 on May 23, 1973, for the portion of the project within Louisiana which were accepted for and on behalf of the United States on Nov. 14, 1973. Terminal facilities. Adequate facilities are to be provided and maintained by local interest. Operations and results during fiscal year. Work by hired labor consisted of planning and preparing design memorandum, preparing plans and specifications, surveys, general engineering and model studies. Bank stabilization was completed at three locations: Grand Bend, La., mile 96; Odra, La., mile 151.2R; and Moreau, La., mile 142.5R. Bank stabilization and realinement was completed at three locations: Hudson, La., mile 98; Montgomery, La., mile 157; and Grappe, La., mile 145. Two closures were completed at Choctaw Bayou Bend, La., mile 71.8 and Hadden-Fort DeRussy, La., mile 60. Phase Two construction of the Lock and Dam at Marksville, La., was completed. Construction continued at Larto, La., mile 40.5L, 90 percent complete and on Phase Three construction of the Lock and Dam at Marksville, La., 56 percent complete. Maintenance with leased dredge Pontchartrain which removed 845,600 cubic yards below the intersection of the Black River. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated in July 1973, and project is 20 percent complete. 21. REMOVING WATER-HYACINTH, LA. Location. Lakes and streams tributary to the gulf coast. Existing project. Removal of plants from navigable waters of Florida, Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana, and Texas, so far as they are or may become an obstruction to navigation, by any mechanical, chemical, or other means whatsoever; for construction and operation of boats equipped with suitable machinery for such removal; and construction and operation of booms to prevent plants drifting from one stream to another. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maximum use of funds available was made by using chemical methods of destruction. Maintenance continued in main waterways and principal tributaries to prevent water-hyacinth obstructions and damage to navigation. Preventive maintenance work was carried out in secondary streams and feeder areas whenever possible. In some cases where alligatorweed has previously kept water-hyacinth fringes confined along the banks, attack of the alligatorweed flea beetles (Agasicles) has reduced its competitiveness and water-hyacinths are multiplying and spreading in the waterways. A total of 10,357 acres of waterhyacinth were treated by chemical in Bayou Black, Lake Cataouatche and feeder streams, Lake des Allemands area, the Port Allen-Morgan City Route and Alternate Route of the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, Lake Dauterive and Grand Lake areas, Bayou Penchant-Bayou Copasaw area, the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, Bayou Lafourche, Bayou Lacassine, and Bayou Teche. Lower water levels in the Mississippi River and all along the coastal area combined with a colder than normal winter have allowed some additional areas to be placed in a maintenance status. The introduction of the waterhyacinth weevil (Neachetina eichhorniae) has been made and populations are increasing. A large scale operations management test using the water-hyacinth weevil and the most promising plant pathogen (Cercospora rodmanii) has begun and will be monitored for effectiveness of control. A moth (Samoedes albiguttalis) has recently been introduced to assist in the control of water-hyacinth. Condition as of Sep. 30. From 1900 to 1902 a boat with suitable machinery for destroying hyacinth by crushing was operated. From that time until 1937 hyacinths were destroyed through use of a solution of arsenic and caustic soda which was sprayed on vegetation. The vegetation was removed by hand crews, and vegetation movement was controlled by booms and barricades. Use of arsenic was discontinued and hand removal supplanted by use of mechanical equipment in conjunction with chemical spray (2,4-dichlorophenoxy-acetic acid). Use of booms and barricades has been discontinued. Use of the quarterboat Tambour was discontinued in September 1981. Present methods of control are by means of chemical spraying supplemented by the use of insects and pathogens for biological control. Waterways Experiment Station is conducting a large-scale operations management test of insects and pathogens for control of water-hyacinth in Louisiana. 11-14 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT 22. TANGIPAHOA RIVER, LA. Location. The river originates in the State of Mississippi and flows southerly to Lake Pontchartrain, La., about 119 miles. (Refer to NOAA Coast Chart No. 11369 and MRC alluvial valley map, Ponchatoula quadrangle.) Existing project. Improvement by removing overhanging trees, snags, and obstructions to navigation for 53.5 miles above mouth, and provide an 8- by 100-foot entrance channel from the 8-foot depth contour in the lake to the 8-foot depth in the river. Variation in water surface is from 3 to 20 feet in the upper reaches due to freshets and from 2 to 5 feet in the lower reach due to winds and tides. The cost of existing project was $61,211, Federal (including $11,500 for previously completed portion and $49,711 for preauthorization studies and modification adopted under Sec. 107, 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended) and $29,346 contributed funds for the modification. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. Terminal facilities. None required. Operations and results duringfiscal year. Hired labor forces conducted reconnaissance surveys and prepared plans and specifications. 23. VERMILION LOCK, LA. (REPLACEMENT OF LOCK) Location. In the Louisiana section of the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway near Abbeville, Vermilion Parish, La., about 163 miles west of Harvey Lock. Existing project. The present Vermilion Lock, located in the most heavily utilized section of the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, is the controlling structure in both width and depth. The lock is used for navigation and flood control (prevention of salt water intrusion). The tumbler-type gates are unsatisfactory for the dual purpose (Flood Damage Prevention-Navigation) operation required, since once the gates are lowered to pass flood flows, they cannot be safely raised until the differential stage across the lock is reduced to about 0.5 foot. The replacement lock also will provide a larger and more efficient outlet for floodwaters. Estimated cost for new work (October 1981) is $30,700,000 Federal, and $120,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Provide all lands, easements and rightsof- way for construction of the project and hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction and maintenance works. The Vermilion Parish Police Jury furnished assurances covering all requirements of local cooperation, including PL 91-611 and PL 91-646, on Mar. 19, 1975. These assurances were in the process of being accepted by the United States, when the Water Resources Development Act of 1976 was enacted authorizing the 110-foot-wide lock. Amended assurances of local cooperation were accepted on behalf of the United States by the Secretary of the'Army on Jul. 5, 1977. The Vermilion Parish Police Jury on May 26, 1981 granted right of entry for construction of project. Terminal facilities. None. Operations and results during fiscal year. Plans and specifications were completed for entire construction. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction contract was awarded September 1981 but was not initiated. 24. WATERWAY FROM EMPIRE, LA., TO GULF OF MEXICO Location. Waterway from Empire, La., to Gulf of Mexico via Bayous Long and Fontanelle. (Refer to Geological Survey, Empire quadrangle.) Existing project. Improvement provides for construction and maintenance of a waterway, 10 miles long, from Stateowned canal and lock at Empire, La., to Gulf of Mexico, to provide a channel 9 by 80 feet, and for initial construction of rubblestone jetties inshore of 6-foot-depth contour, with landward extensions thereof as required to prevent flanking, and for seaward extensions to 9-foot-depth contour if and when it becomes apparent that such extensions will be more economical than maintenance dredging of entrance channel. Normal range of tide is from 16 to 40 inches; hurricane tides may exceed 6 feet. Construction was completed at a cost of $1,068,142; except for an estimated $1,573,000 for extension of jetties to 9-foot-depth contour to be constructed if necessary. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Hired labor work consisted of reconnaissance surveys and environmental studies. Condition as of Sep. 30. Project is physically complete, unless at a later date it is found necessary to extend jetties to 9- foot-depth contour. Project construction was initiated in July 1948 and completed in Jun. 1950, during which period the 9- by 80-foot channel from Empire, La., to Gulf of Mexico, 10 miles, was excavated by contract. A total of 4,061 linear feet of jetties was constructed by contract to 6-foot-depth contour, 1,818 linear feet on east jetty and 2,243 linear feet on west jetty, from Jun. 23, 1949, to Feb. 18, 1950, and Feb. 2 to Mar. 1, 1971. 25. WATERWAY FROM INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY TO BAYOU DULAC, LA. (Bayous Grand Caillou and LeCarpe, La.) Location. Bayou LeCarpe is a tidal stream which rises about 1.5 miles southeast of Houma in Terrebonne Parish and flows southerly into Bayou Pelton, thence into Bayou Grand Caillou, which flows southwesterly into Caillou Bay, a total distance of about 40 miles. (Refer to Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart, No. 1116 and Geological Survey maps of Houma, Dulac, Bayou DuLarge, and Dog Lake quadrangles.) Existing project. As modified, provides for a 10- by 45-foot channel in Bayou LeCarpe from Gulf Intracoastal Waterway 2.6 miles to Houma navigation canal; a 5- by 40-foot channel through Bayou Pelton and Bayou Grand Caillou to Bayou Dulac, a distance of about 13.7 miles. Between miles 2.6 and 5, this project coincides with or is adjacent to 15- by 150-foot Houma navigation canal. Normal range of tide is 3 to 10 inches; from winds, 1 to 3 feet. Cost of new work, completed in August 1964, was $129,662. Local cooperation. Local interests must furnish lands, easements, and rights-of-way necessary for enlargement and subsequent maintenance of Bayou LeCarpe and of aids to navigation, and provide alterations to facilities, and hold the United States free from damage. Assurances were furnished and accepted. Local agency made available spoil areas for maintenance dredging of Bayou LeCarpe. None of these areas will be transferred to the United States. Meetings are 11-15 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 continuing with local interests to resolve problems with their required cash contribution on total project cost. Terminal facilities. Many terminal and transfer facilities are in Houma and along waterways which flow through area between Houma and Gulf of Mexico. All facilities are privately owned and operated. Facilities are adequate for existing commerce and for reasonably prospective commerce. Ample space exists for expansion of existing facilities or for construction of new wharves and appurtenances. Operations and results during fiscal year. Hired labor consisted of real estate activities, reconnaissance surveys, water quality studies and maintenance dredging. Maintenance contract dredge Cape Fear removed 70,900 cubic yards from Bayou LeCarpe. Condition as of Sep. 30. The 5- by 40-foot channel was constructed from January 1938 to August 1938, and modification of October 23, 1962, for enlargement of 2.54 miles of Bayou LeCarpe to 10 feet by 45 feet was initiated in May and completed August 1964. 26. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS See Table 11-E. 27. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Sec. 107, Public Law 86- 645, as amended (preauthorization.) Preauthorization studies costs for fiscal year was $38,199 for Simmesport Harbor and $37,242 for Bayou Grand Caillou. Flood Damage Prevention 28. BAYOU BODCAU AND TRIBUTARIES, ARK. AND LA. Location. In left bank flood plain of Red River. Bayou Bodcau rises in vicinity of Hope, Ark., and flows southerly through Bayou Bodcau Reservoir and Bodcau Lake to join Cypress Bayou and form Red Chute Bayou, continues through Red Chute Bayou, Flat Lake, and Loggy Bayou to Red River, about 40 miles below Shreveport, La. Existing project. Cypress Bayou-Red Chute Bayou levee: Extend existing levee from about 8 miles southeast of Benton, La., proceeding southerly to junction of Cross and Red Chute Bayous, and then parallel to Red Chute Bayou on the right descending bank to its junction with Cutoff Bayou for a total distance of approximately 25 miles; construct landside drainage channel and several culverts with flap gates to Red Chute Bayou; construct cutoff on Red Chute Bayou just south of Louisiana Highway 527; construct approximately 5 miles of levee on left descending bank of Red Chute Bayou extending south from Louisiana Highway 612, and relocate utility lines as needed. Flat River-Loggy Bayou levee: Extend from lower end of existing Red River levee in vicinity of Ninock, La., along high (left descending) bank of Red River to a point on right descending bank of Loggy Bayou, about 1 mile above its mouth, thence generally along right descending bank of Loggy Bayou, Red Chute, Cutoff Bayou, and Flat River to Taylortown to tie into existing Red River levee; close Flat River near its junction with Cutoff Bayou and install one 36- inch round corrugated metal pipe with automatic flap gate to drain isolated pockets and provide uninterrupted drainage; construct drainage structures on Flat River near its junction with Red Chute Bayou and along alinement of the Loggy Bayou in the vicinity of Grassy Lake; and make necessary utility relocations. Flat River channel improvement: Enlarge to average bottom width of 50 feet with flat side slopes and deepen by 2 to 6 feet from the confluence with Cutoff Bayou to junction with Cooper Bayou, 11.6 miles, including required relocations and modifications of utilities. Estimated cost for new work (October 1981) is $43,300,000 Federal and $8,400,000 non- Federal. The subject project was one of the Water Resources projects reviewed in March 1977 in accordance with the President's request. As a result of this review, the President recommended to deauthorize this project. Congress subsequently directed the Corps to take the following two actions: Construct levees on Red Chute Bayou below Cutoff Bayou that are required to prevent induced flood damage that would otherwise result from the abandonment of partly completed project. Initiate studies to determine if modifications to the authorized project would permit its completion in a form consistent with the current executive policy. Work on correcting some design deficiencies, induced flood plan and the project modification studies has been initiated. The induced flood plan will be advertised for award in November 1982, if construction funds are made available. The project modification studies are expected to be completed in June 1983. Local cooperation. For details see pages 11-24 and 25, Annual Report for FY 1980. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work by hired labor forces consisted of preparation of plans and specifications, for design deficiency, and engineering studies. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated in October 1974 and is 14 percent complete. 29. BAYOU BODCAU RESERVOIR, LA. Location. In Red River Basin on Bayou Bodcau in Bossier Parish, La., 72 miles above mouth of Loggy Bayou and 35 miles northeast of Shreveport, La. (Refer to Geological Survey State map, scale 1:500,000.) Existing project. An earth-fill dam rising 76 feet above streambed with a reservoir providing a flood damage prevention storage capacity of 357,000 acre-feet. Outlet works are in south abutment, and an uncontrolled spillway is on north abutment. Reservoir controls 656 square miles, or 53 percent, of entire drainage area of Bayou Bodcau. Construction of a floodway for diversion of Bayou Bodcau and Cypress Bayou to improve flood protection was authorized by 1936 Flood Damage Prevention Act. This authorization was modified by 1938 Flood Control Act, which authorized construction of a reservoir and other flood damage prevention works in lieu of construction of a floodway for diversion of Bayou Bodcau and Cypress Bayou, La. to improve protection, and further modified by War Department Civil Appropria- 11-16 NEW ORLEANS, LA., DISTRICT tion Act of 1939 which provided that reservoir and other flood control works on Bayou Bodcau and Cypress Bayou, La., authorized by Flood Damage Prevention Act of 1938 shall be constructed in accordance with revised plans and cost estimates in Office, Chief of Engineers. New work was completed in 1961, except construction under Code 711, was $4,098,740. Estimated cost for Code 711 (October 1981) is $1,027,000. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Hired labor forces continued operation and ordinary maintenance of the dam and reservoir, real estate activities, stream gaging, surveys and economic studies. Number of visitor-days of recreational use, 285,000 (Calendar Year 1980). (See Table 11-F for reservoir operations.) Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated April 1947 and completed April 1961, except construction under Code 711. 30. BAYOU PIERRE, LA. Location. In Red River Basin below Shreveport, La., along channel of Bayou Pierre from its mouth at Grand Ecore, La., upstream 30 miles to its confluence with Bayou Wincy. (Refer to Geological Survey State map, scale 1:500,000.) Existing project. Provides for widening channel at intervals, totaling 12.9 miles, and snagging of 29.7 miles, to reduce flood damage and improve sanitary and living conditions over a wide area. Cost of new work, completed in 1939, was $299,529. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Hired labor forces continued condition and operations studies as required. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated in Fiscal Year 1938 and completed in Fiscal Year 1939. 31. BRUSH BAYOU, LA. Location. Rises in the southwestern portion of Shreveport, La., in Caddo Parish. The stream flows in a generally southerly direction approximately 9 miles to a junction with Boggy Bayou. Existing project. The plan of improvement consists of the enlargement and realinement of the channel between miles 1.20 and 7.42. Between miles 1.20 and 2.18 the channel would be radically realined, and above the point, the enlarged channel would generally follow the existing alinement. Bottom widths for the improved channel vary from 100 feet at mile 1.20 to 20 feet at mile 7.42. Construction of the project would require modification of two highway bridges, one railway bridge, and numerous pipelines and power lines. Estimated cost of new work (October 1977) is $1,000,000 Federal and $2,480,000 non-Federal, including $1,120,000 contributed funds. Includes $80,500 preauthorization study cost. Local cooperation. Provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way necessary for the construction of the project; hold and save the United States free from claim for damages due to the construction works; maintain and operate all works, including measures for beautification, after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army; bear all cost for the project in excess of the Federal limitation of $1,000,000; provide without cost to the United States all relocations and alterations of all drains, bridges (except railroad bridges) and roads, pipelines, sewers, utility lines, and other facilities made necessary by the project; prevent encroachment on improved channels, and adopt and enforce flood plain regulations to restrict development of areas lying below the elevation 0 f the 100-year-frequency flood under project conditions; comply with the provisions of Public Laws 91-611 and 91-646. Caddo Parish Police Jury is assuring agency. Assurances have been received and accepted. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work by hired labor consisted of real estate activities and advance engineering work. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction is scheduled for completion in second quarter of Fiscal Year 1982. 32. CADDO LAKE, LA. Location. In Caddo Parish, about 19 miles northwest of Shreveport, La., at the foot of Caddo Lake and at head of Twelve Mile Bayou. Existing project. Replacement of the original dam was completed in Jun. 1971, having same flow characteristics and located as near as practicable downstream of the old dam, built under navigation project "Cypress Bayou and Waterway between Jefferson, Tex., and Shreveport, La." New dam will be capable of being raised in the future if desirable and justified. Estimated cost of new work (October 1976) was $3,587,800 Federal and $28,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Public Law 94-587, Section 174, amended the Flood Damage Prevention Act of 1965 (PL 89-298) to provide that operation and maintenance of Caddo Lake Dam be the responsibility of the Secretary of the Army, acting through the Chief of Engineers. Conveyance of title to the United States from the Caddo Levee District is being reviewed. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance by hired labor consisted of condition and operation studies, stream gaging, and water quality studies. 33. GRAND ISLE AND VICINITY, LA. Location. In south Jefferson Parish, La., along the Gulf of Mexico, about 50 miles south of New Orleans and 45 miles northwest of southwest pass (Mississippi River). Existing project. The project provides protection from waves driven by hurricanes that have a frequency of recurrence of up to once in every 50 years. The plan consists of a berm and vegetated dune extending the length of Grand Isle's gulf shore and a jetty to stabilize the western end of the island at Caminada Pass. The dune would have a 10-foot-wide crown at an elevation of 11.5 feet mean sea level, 1 on 5 side slopes, and protective vegetation. The sandfill berm would slope from an elevation of 8.5 feet mean sea level at the toe of the dune 180 feet gulfward to an elevation of 3 feet mean sea level and, from this point, would assume its natural slope to the offshore bottom. The jetty provided by the plan has a top width of 6 feet at an elevation of 4 feet mean sea level, 1 on 2 side slopes, and extends approximately 2,600 feet along the western end of the island at Caminada Pass. Estimated cost of 11-17 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 project (October 1981) is $8,650,000 Federal and $5,080,000 non-Federal, including $2,110,000 contributed funds. Local cooperation. Provide without cost to the United States, all lands, easements, and rights-of-way for construction of the project, currently estimated to cost $2,380,000; accomplish without cost to the United States all relocations and alterations of buildings, streets, utilities, and other strictures and improvements made necessary by the construction of the project; hold and save the United States free from claims for damages due to the construction works; assure maintenance, repairs, and periodic beach nourishment of the project after completion as may be required to serve the intended purposes in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army, except that the Federal Government will contribute, for an initial period of 15 years, a sum currently estimated at $38,000 annually toward the cost of beach nourishment associated with beach erosion prevention, subject to a final determination on the basis of conditions of public use and ownership at the time of construction; provide a cash contribution for the hurricane protection function in an amount sufficient to insure that local investment in cash, equivalent work, and fair market value of lands and relocations are at least equal to 30 percent of all first costs allocated to that function, which cash contribution is presently estimated at zero; contribute cash or equivalent work an amount sufficient to pay the non-Federal share of construction costs allocated to beach erosion control, that amount presently estimated at $5,080,000 less $1,000,000 credit for completed work, west end jetty, or $4,080,000, the final amount to be determined at the time of project construction in accordance with cost-sharing procedures for beach erosion control as defined in the report; obtain approval by the Chief of Engineers, prior to commencement of any work on shore and beach protection phases of the project if undertaken separately from the recommended combined project, of detailed plans and specifications for the work contemplated and also the arrangements of prosecuting such work, excluding the preauthorization jetty construction; assure continued public ownership of the shore upon which the amount of Federal participation in the beach protection phase is based, and its administration for public use during the life of the project, and assure continued availability for public use of privately owned shores; assure that water pollution which would endanger the health of bathers will not be permitted; adopt and enforce appropriate ordinances to provide for the preservation of the improvement and its protective vegetation; at least annually, inform interests affected that the project will not provide any substantial protection from hurricane flooding on the bay side, or from hurricane surges higher in elevation than those of Hurricane Betsy of Sep. 9,1965; comply with the provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies of 1970, Public Law 91- 646; agree to the requirements of Section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970, Public Law 91-611. Formal assurances requested of Jefferson Parish Council, and the Mayor, Town of Grand Isle, La., on Aug. 12, 1981. The Town of Grand Isle is not financially capable to be the sole local assurer. The Jefferson Parish Council passed a resolution on Sep. 23, 1981, whereby the Council agreed to be co-assurers with the Town of Grand Isle to provide the necessary local cooperation requirements for this project. Operations and results during the fiscal year. Work by hired labor consisted of engineering studies to complete plans and specifications. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was not initiated. 34. LAKE PONTCHARTRAIN AND VICINITY, LA. (HURRICANE PROTECTION) Location. In southeastern Louisiana, vicinity of New Orleans, in St. Charles, Jefferson, Orleans, St. Bernara, and St. Tammany Parishes, comprising lower land and water area between Mississippi River alluvial ridge and the Pleistocene escarpment to north and west. The dominant topographic feature is Lake Pontchartrain, a shallow landlocked tidal basin, about 640 square miles in area and averaging 12 feet deep, connecting with lesser Lake Maurepas to the west and through Lake Borgne and Mississippi Sound to the gulf to the east. The lake drains about 4,700 square miles of tributary area. (Refer to Geological Survey quadrangles Yscloskey and Malheureaux Point, Drum Bay, Door Point, Lake Eugenie, Oak Mound Bayou, Mitchell Keys, Lake Eloi, and Morgan Harbor; Engineer quadrangles Slidell, Covington, Ponchatoula, Springfield, Denham Springs, Donaldsonville, Mt. Airy, Bonnet Carre, Spanish Fort, Chef Menteur, Rigolets, St. Bernard, New Orleans, and Hahnville; and Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts No. 1115 and 1116. Existing project. Provides for control of hurricane tides by construction of two independent units; the Lake Pontchartrain barrier plan involves construction of a barrier levee along eastern boundary of the lake with navigation and hurricane flood control structures in Chef Menteur Pass, the Rigolets, and at Seabrook. These protective works, together with strengthening and extension of existing protective works and the construction of the Seabrook Lock, will afford full protection to the south shore of Lake Pontchartrain from Bonnet Carr Spillway to the eastern limit of Orleans Parish levee along the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway and the Inner Harbor Navigation Canal. The Chalmette area plan consists of improving existing protection along east bank Inner Harbor Navigation Canal from the lock to Florida Avenue, then constructing a new levee to Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet, thence along south bank of gulf outlet to Bayou Lawler, then turning south and tieing into Mississippi River levee at Violet, La. The approved Chalmette area plan was modified, under the discretionary authority of the Chief of Engineers, to provide for enlargement of the protected area by construction of a levee from the Mississippi River levee near Caernarvon, La., to the vicinity of Verret, La., thence to and along the Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet to a junction with the approved levee at the Bayou Lawler crossing of the Mississippi River- Gulf Outlet, and elimination of the levee in the approved plan from the Bayou Lawler and Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet to Violet, La. Navigable drainage structures will be provided at Bayous Bienvenue and Dupre. Strengthening existing seawall at Mandeville on the north shore will insure that future hurricanes will not seriously damage this resort community. Estimated cost for new work (October 1981) is $629,000,000 Federal and $295,000,000 non-Federal, including cash contribution of $251,114,000 which includes $24,360,000 estimated to be capitalized value of operation and maintenance of Rigolets navigation lock and appurtenant channel. Local cooperation. Provide all rights-of-way; bear 30 percent of the first cost, consisting of fair market value of providing all lands, easements, and rights-of-way, including borrow and spoil disposal areas for construction, accomplish alteration and relocation of roads, railroads, pipelines, cables, 11-18 NEW ORLEANS, LA., DISTRICT wharves, drainage structures, and other facilities; maintain and operate all works after completion; and hold and save the United States free from damages. See H. Doc. No. 231, 89th Cong., 1st sess. for more detailed requirements of local cooperation. Assuring Agency: The Orleans Levee District, Lake Borgne Basin Levee District, St. Bernard Parish Police Jury, Louisiana Office of Public Works, and Pontchartrain Levee District. Basic assurances were received from the following: Orleans Levee District for the entire barrier plan and that portion of the Chalmette area plan in Orleans Parish; Pontchartrain Levee District for the barrier plan; Lake Borgne Levee District and St. Bernard Parish Police Jury for the Chalmette area plan in St. Bernard Parish. Supplemental assurances covering Public Law 91-646 have been received from the Orleans Levee District and the Pontchartrain Levee District. Lake Borgne Basin Levee District and St. Bernard Parish Police Jury have executed the supplemental assurance. The Governor of Louisiana executed an assurance containing all required provisions of local cooperation, including Public Law 91-646, for and on behalf of St. Tammany Parish. Approval of this assurance is being delayed pending receipt of supporting documents. Louisiana Office of Public Works is assisting in obtaining the required documents. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preparation of design memorandums and plans and specifications continued by hired labor. One design memorandum was completed and submitted for review to LMVD and preparation of two continued. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction started May 1967 and is 49 percent complete, with 13.3 miles reinforced concrete floodwalls, 31.1 miles of first-lift levees and 5.5 miles of second-lift levees completed in the New Orleans east area, 1.3 miles of floodwall and 27.9 miles of first-lift levees, 9.1 miles of second-lift levees, 10.4 miles of first-lift levee enlargement, and two control structures completed in the Chalmette area. Contract work continued on three contracts. Citrus Back levee floodwall, construction of 0.5 mile of floodwall and New Orleans East Back levee, construction of 4.4 miles of secondlift levee in the New Orleans East area and Sta. 65 to 270, construction of 3.9 miles of second-lift levee in the Chalmette area, were accomplished. 35. LAROSE TO GOLDEN MEADOW, LA. (HURRICANE PROTECTION) Location. In coastal section of Louisiana, along Bayou Lafourche, and includes lands on both banks of the bayou from Larose to 2 miles south of Golden Meadow. (Refer to Geological survey quadrangles Cut-off, Lake Felicity, Bay Dosgris, Golden Meadow Farms, Bay Tambour, Mink Bayou, Caminada Pass, Leeville, Belle Pass, Pelican Pass, and Calumet Island; Engineer quadrangles New Orleans, Hahnville, Point-a-la-Hache, Barataria, and Fort Livingston; and Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 1115 and 1116 Existing project. Provides a loop levee about 40 miles long along both banks of Bayou Lafourche from Larose to South Golden Meadow; enlargement of 3 miles of existing levee at Golden Meadow; floodgates for navigation and hurricane protection in Bayou Lafourche at upper and lower bayou crossings; about 8 miles of low interior levees to regulate intercepted drainage and seven multibarreled culverts controlled by flapgates. Estimated cost for new work (October 1981) is $60,900,000 Federal and $26,100,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way, including borrow areas and spoil disposal areas, and accomplish alterations to roads, pipelines, cables, wharves, oil wells, and any other facilities necessary for the construction of the project; all at an estimated cost of $9,200,000; bear 30 percent of the total project cost, a sum presently estimated at $26,100,000 consisting of the items listed above, and a cash contribution presently estimated at $16,900,000 or equivalent work specifically undertaken as an integral part of the project after authorization and in accordance with construction schedules as required by the Chief of Engineers; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works; maintain and operate all the works after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army; and prevent any encroachment on ponding areas unless substitute storage capacity or equivalent pumping capacity is provided promptly without cost to the United States; comply with the provisions of the Uniform Relocations Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (Public Law 91-646) and with the provisions of Section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (Public Law 91-611) in acquiring real property. The Board of Commissioners of the South Louisiana Tidal Water Control Levee District executed the required Agreement of Local Cooperation on Nov. 13, 1972, which was executed by the United States on Jul. 10, 1973 and approved on behalf of the Secretary of the Army on Aug. 29, 1973. Section 38, Paragraph 1051 et seq., Louisiana Revised Statutes created the South Lafourche Levee District. The South Lafourche Levee District assumed the rights and obligations of the South Louisiana Tidal Water Control Levee District with respect to this project. Operations and results duringfiscal year. Construction for a Hurricane Protection Levee, Section C. South, first-lift, initiated Nov. 8, 1979, was completed Dec. 18, 1980, with construction of 3.4 miles of levee embankment and incidental work. Preparation of a Supplement to the GDM was completed during the year. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction commenced in February 1975 and is 30 percent complete. 36. MCKINNEY BAYOU, ARK. AND TEX. Location. The McKinney Bayou watershed covers approximately 360 square miles and is located in southwestern Arkansas and northeastern Texas in the vicinity of the city of Texarkana, Ark. and Tex., within the flood plain of the Red River. Existing project. Provides improvements for three major elements; improvement of the McKinney Bayou channel, construction of a diversion channel into Red River and control structure at Buzzard Bluff, and construction of a diversion channel into Red River and control structure about one-half mile west of the Arkansas-Texas state line. Mitigation of project-induced wildlife losses are included in the project. Estimated cost of new work (October 1981) is $6,900,000 Federal and $1,970,000 non-Federal, including cash contribution of $610,000. Local cooperation. For details see pages 11-29 and 30, Annual Report for FY 1980. 11-19 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 Operations and results during fiscal year. Work by hired labor consisted of planning for the project, investigations, environmental studies, and surveys. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction has not been initiated. 37. NEW ORLEANS TO VENICE, LA., HURRICANE PROTECTION Location. Includes land subject to inundation by hurricane tides extending along both banks of the Mississippi River below New Orleans from vicinity of Phoenix to Venice, La. Existing project. Provides for improvements along Mississippi River below New Orleans, La., for prevention of hurricane tidal flood damages by increasing heights of existing back levees and modifying existing drainage facilities where necessary in three separate reaches: Reach A, on the west bank from City Price to Empire, 15 miles, 4,340 acres protected; Reach B, on the west bank from Empire to Venice, 21 miles, 4,900 acres protected; and Reach C, on the east bank from Phoenix to Bohemia (construction recently completed by local agency with credit given as equivalent work), 16 miles, 5,470 acres protected, and construction of a barrier levee on the east bank of the Mississippi River from Bohemia to mile 10 AHP with enlargement of the west bank Mississippi River levee from Fort Jackson to Venice, generally called the East Bank Barrier Levee plan. Reach B was later divided into two units, Reach B-1 from Empire to Fort Jackson and Reach B-2 from Fort Jackson to Venice, La., as a result of a request made by the local agency. Estimated cost of new work (October 1981) is $115,000,000 Federal and $49,700,000 non-Federal, including $39,370,000 cash contributions or equivalent work. Local cooperation. Provide all lands, easements and rightsof- way including borrow areas and spoil disposal areas necessary for the construction of the project, at costs presently estimated at $6,073,000; accomplish all necessary alterations and relocations to roads, pipelines, cables, wharves and other facilities required by the construction of the project at costs presently estimated at $8,403,000; bear 30 percent of the first cost, a sum presently estimated at $70,000,000, and cash contribution presently estimated at $55,524,000 to be paid either in a lump sum prior to initiation of construction or in installments prior to start of pertinent work items, in accordance with construction schedules as required by the Chief of Engineers, or as a substitute for any part of the cash contribution, accomplish in accordance with approved construction schedules items of work of equivalent value as determined by the Chief of Engineers, the final apportionment of costs to be made after actual costs and values have been determined; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works; maintain and operate all works after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army; prevent any encroachment on ponding areas unless substitute storage capacity or equivalent pumping is provided promptly; and at least annually, notify those affected that the project will not provide complete protection from tidal flooding and that further local actions must be taken during hurricane emergencies. Local interests are also required to comply with the provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (PL 91-646), in acquiring real property. PL 91-611. Not applicable. Construction started prior to Jan. 1, 1972. PL 91-646. A constitutional amendment was provided by the Louisiana legislature on Feb. 1, 1972 allowing local interests to comply. The estimated cost to local interests is $48,000. Assurances of local cooperation for Reaches A, B-1, I-2 and C, requested on Jan. 7, 1963, were furnished by the Plaquemines Parish Commission Council on Mar. 6, 1964. Required supporting papers were furnished on Mar. 16, 1965 and accepted. Supplemental assurances covering the requirements of PL 91-646 were received from Plaquemines Parish Commission Council on May 23, 1973 and accepted on Jun. 20, 1973. Assurances for the entire project have been furnished and accepted, although they do not specifically mention the East Bank Barrier Levee Plan. The scope of the project has not changed; however, local interests were requested to furnish separate assurances for the East Bank Barrier Levee. These assurances have not yet been received. There was a delay of approximately 26 months in the furnishing of assurances by local interests primarily because they desired that agreement on levee alinement be consummated as fully as possible before giving their assurance. Problems of assurance of local cooperation have been resolved and rights-of-way were furnished for the first two Reach B-1 items of work on Aug. 23, 1968 and May 20, 1970, respectively. All negotiations for relocations are the responsibility of local interests. These mainly consist of raising several petroleum and natural gas pipelines to the levee configuration and relocation of privately owned frame structures used as fishing and boating camps. To assure that there will be no delay in construction of levees, local interests are notified well in advance so that the owners of the pipelines can be advised. Assuring Agency: Plaquemines Parish Commission Council. Assurances for all reaches of the project, except the East Bank Barrier levee, have been furnished. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work by hired labor: Planning for this project and engineering studies continued. A contract for Reach B-l, Hurricane Protection Levee, first enlargement, was initiated Oct. 2, 1980. Reach B-l, final enlargement, was awarded Jul. 13, 1981 but was not initiated. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction began on the project in September 1968 and the total project is approximately 30 percent complete. First lift construction is complete on Reaches B-1 and B-2 and the first enlargement is completed for a portion of Reach B-1. Second lift construction is complete on Reach C. Initial construction on Reach A is scheduled to begin in Fiscal Year 1985. Initial construction on the East Bank Barrier is not scheduled, pending the furnishing of assurances by local interest. 38. RED RIVER BELOW DENISON DAM (NEW ORLEANS DIST.) Location. On Red River and its tributaries below Denison Dam, in Oklahoma, Arkansas, Texas, and Louisiana. (Refer to Geological Survey State maps and folio "Maps of Red River"- 1958 edition.) 11-20 NEW ORLEANS, LA., DISTRICT Existing project. Flood Control Act of 1946 approved general plan for flood control on Red River below Denison Dam, Tex. and Okla., which provides for construction of six flood damage prevention reservoirs in combination with existing or authorized Federal and non-Federal levee improvements, modified as required, and channel stabilization at locations where levee setbacks are impossible or uneconomical. This act further authorized incorporation of several separate existing projects for flood damage prevention along Red River below Denison, above jurisdiction of the MRC, into this project. By Public Law 780, 83d Cong., 2d sess., as amended by Public Law 218, 84th Cong. 1st sess., and Public Law 645, 86th Cong., 1st sess., plan of improvement was amended to include additional projects as indicated in following lists of reservoirs and local protection works considered in general flood damage prevention plan for the Red River below Denison Dam, and existing flood control projects incorporated into project in New Orleans District. (See Table 11-G for new projects and Table 11-H for incorporated projects.) Local cooperation. See individual reports herein. 39. RED RIVER BELOW DENISON DAM, LEVEES AND BANK STABILIZATION (NEW ORLEANS DIST.) Location. Along the main stem of the Red River from the head of the levee system immediately above Index, Ark., through the southwest corner of Arkansas to the vicinity of Boyce, La., on the right bank, and Pineville, La., on the left bank. Existing project. Raising and strengthening existing and authorized Red River levees to provide protection against. flooding and bank protection works at locations where levee setbacks are impossible or uneconomical. The plan consists of raising and strengthening existing and authorized Red River levees to provide against a flood approximately 20 percent greater than the flood of 1945, the flood of record, as modified by authorized reservoirs. Bank protection works are to be constructed at locations where levee setbacks are impossible or uneconomical. Estimated cost for new work (October 1980) is $55,100,000 Federal and $1,310,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Local interests must furnish lands, easements, rights-of-way, and spoil disposal areas necessary for construction; hold and save the United States free from damages; and maintain and operate works after completion. Local interests have been prompt in furnishing levee rightsof- way upon request, except for the following three items of low priority: McKinney Bayou Drainage District, enlargement of approximately 4 miles of intermittently low levee; Garland Levee District, enlargement of approximately 1.3 miles of levee; and Red River Levee District No. 1, enlargement of approximately 4.3 miles of levee. The local agencies are convinced that the flow line lowering produced by completed reservoirs has made this work unnecessary. Assuring Agencies: Red River Levee and Drainage District, North Bossier Levee District, Red River Water Commission, Bossier Levee District, Caddo Levee District, Cane River Levee and Drainage District, Garland Levee District, Hempstead County Levee District No. 1, Miller County Levee District No. 2, Red River Levee District No. 1, Nineteenth Louisiana Levee District, and Long Prairie Levee District. All basic assurances received. Supplemental assurances covering Public Law 91-646 have been received from all agencies except the North Bossier Levee District. Operations and results during fiscal year. Hired labor forces continued investigations, surveys, and preparation of plans and specifications. Bank stabilization was completed at Field, Ark., mile 362.0L, Jul. 9, 1981. One construction contract was initia d on May 22, 1981 at Dukedale, La., mile 290.OL. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated in February 1948 and the project is 85 percent complete. 40. RED RIVER WATERWAYSHREVEPORT, LA., TO INDEX, ARK. Location. In northwest Louisiana, southwest Arkansas, and northeast Texas, along the Red River between Shreveport, La., and Index, Ark. Existing project. To provide for realining the channels of Red River from Shreveport, La., to the levee system near Index, Ark., by means of dredging, cutoffs, and training works and for stabilizing its banks by means of revetments, dikes, and other methods. Facilities to provide opportunities for recreation and for fish and wildlife development are an integral part of the project. Estimated cost for new work (October 1981) is $186,000,000 Federal and $24,000,000 non- Federal, including $2,780,000 contributed funds. Local cooperation. Provide prior to construction and without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way necessary for construction and subsequent maintenance of the project, including suitable areas determined by the Chief of Engineers to be required in the general public interest for disposal of spoil, and provide necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads, and embankments, therefor, or the cost of such retaining works and also including all additional lands, or rights in land, required to insure public control of the recreational development; and hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction and subsequent maintenance of the project, maintain all the project works upstream of the navigation improvement at Shreveport, La., after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army. Provide without cost to the United States all relocations of utilities, bridges (except railroads), sewers, pipelines, and any other alterations of existing improvements which may be required for construction of the project; where the appraised value of the land provided for recreation development amounts to less than 50 percent of the total first cost of recreational development, make additional contributions sufficient to bring the non-Federal share to at least that level; which additional contribution may consist of the actual cost of carrying out an agreed-upon portion of the development, or a cash contribution, or a combination of both; operate and maintain for the life of the Federal project the recreational areas and all facilities installed pursuant to the agreement, except that facilities which are integral parts of a structure operated and maintained by the Federal Government shall be operated and maintained under whatever cost-sharing arrangement applies to the operation and maintenance of the basic structure; and assure access to recreational developments to all on equal terms. Local interests are required to comply with the provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property 11-21 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (Public Law 91-646) and with the provisions of Sec. 221 of the Flood "Control" Act of 1970 (Public Law 91-611), in acquiring real property. Section 187 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1976 (Public Law 94-587) modifies the requirement of local cooperation to provide that non-Federal interests shall contribute 25 percent of the construction costs of retaining dikes, bulkheads, and embankments required for initial and subsequent disposal of dredged material. Assuring Agencies: Louisiana: Formal assurances for the project in Louisiana were executed by the Red River Waterway Commission on Feb. 26, 1969, and accepted on behalf of the United States on Apr. 15, 1969. Amended assurances covering the provisions of Public Law 91-646 and Public Law 91-611 were executed by the commission on May 23, 1973, and accepted on behalf of the United States on Nov. 14, 1973. The Red River Waterway Commission was formed expressly to provide the local cooperation for the project and has an adequate tax base to fulfill its objectives. Arkansas: On Oct. 16, 1969, the Arkansas Soil and Water Conservation Commission furnished a statement of willingness to provide local cooperation on the proposed plan. In July 1976, the Soil and Water Resources Division of the Arkansas Department of Commerce stated that they would approach the Arkansas Legislature to obtain funds on a recurring yearly basis sufficient to insure its portion of the project funds by start of construction in Arkansas. By letter dated Jun. 20, 1977, the Director of the Soil and Water Resources Division advised that the Arkansas General Assembly appropriated $750,000 in the 1977 session to be held as a trust fund for payment of local cost sharing on this project. Further, they anticipated that additional funding will be added in future years to enable them to have on hand the required funds at the time construction begins. Texas: On Dec. 17, 1969, the Governor of Texas furnished a statement of willingness to provide local cooperation for bank stabilization. A meeting was held in Austin, Tex., on Mar. 1, 1977, concerning sponsors of the Texas portion of the project. The purpose of the meeting was to discuss the status of the waterway project and the type of organization needed to accomplish project assurances, the powers required by such an organization may be established. The Texas Water Development Board (TWDB) stated that they would take the lead in obtaining an organization with the ability to provide the local cooperation requirements. In the third quarter of 1980 the State of Texas moved closer to achieving that goal by action taken by the three Texas counties of Bowie, Lamar, and Red River, who have petitioned the State to enact legislation permitting them to join the Red River Authority of Texas. By this action, the Red River Authority of Texas will become legally empowered to act as sponsor for the Waterway. Terminal facilities. Adequate facilities are to be provided and maintained by local interests. Operations and results during fiscal year. Advanced engineering and design work was accomplished by hired labor forces. Preparation of Phase 1 of the GDM is approximately 52 percent complete. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction has not been initiated. 41. WALLACE LAKE, LA. Location. In Red River Basin on Cypress Bayou, Caddo and De Soto Parishes, La., 66 miles above mouth of Bayou Pierre and about 14 miles southeast of Shreveport, La. (Refer to Geological Survey map, scale 1:500,000.) Existing project. An earth-fill dam 4,940 feet long at top, including 644 feet of spillway and outlet works, rising 48 feet above streambed, with a reservoir providing storage of 96,100 acre-feet, including a conservation pool of 7,800 acre-feet. Outlet works and uncontrolled spillway are centered about 1,250 feet north of south abutment. Reservoir controls 260 square miles, or about 20 percent of total drainage area of Bayou Pierre, Cypress Bayou, and tributaries combined, and affords protection against floods for an area of about 90,000 acres of valley below dam. Cost for new work completed in 1946 was $1,219,371, including $17,164 for Code 711. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. For details see page 1024, Annual Report Fiscal Year 1946. Operations and results during fiscal year. Hired labor work consisted of condition and operation studies, stream gaging, and operation and maintenance of the dam as required. (See Table 11-F for reservoir operations.) Condition as of Sep. 30. All construction work on project was completed in December 1946. Main portion of dam ws constructed during Fiscal Year 1943; stabilization of railroad embankment was accomplished from June to November 1946; and placing of fill in closure section of dam was accomplished from November to December 1946. Recreational facilities at the lake were closed in May 1972. 42. WEST AGURS, LA. Location. The project area is located in Caddo Parish in northwest Louisiana, immediately adjacent to the northern corporate limits of the City of Shreveport, Louisiana. Existing project. Provides for the installation of 232 relief wells excavated on centers 50 feet apart along the bottom for the entire length of the existing drainage canal on the landside of West Agurs Levee. The wells would extend from the thalweg of the borrow pit about 22 feet into the pervious sand stratum underlying the area. The wells would be 2 feet in diameter and backfilled with clean gravel. Disposal from the well excavation will be spread on the landside of the levee. No relocations will be required. Estimated cost of new work (October 1981) is $800,000 Federal. Local cooperation. Provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way, including all borrow areas, and the relocation of buildings, roads, pipelines and utilities necessary for construction of the project, such as relocations to be made in accordance with the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, Public Law 91-646; hold and save the United States free from any claims for damages due to the construction works; maintain and operate all works, including the well system, after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army; and provide and operate and maintain all interior drainage works, including pumping stations, which may be required for the development of the protected area. Formal assurances have not been requested. The provisions of PL 91-611 and PL 91-646 will be included as a requirement when formal acts of assurances are requested. By letter dated Nov. 19, 1971 and Mar. 20, 1972, the Board of Commissioners 11-22 NEW ORLEANS, LA., DISTRICT of the Caddo Levee District indicated its ability and willingness to comply with the terms of local cooperation. On Feb. 16, 1979, the Board of Commissioners of the Caddo Levee District reaffirmed their willingness to furnish the items of local cooperation. Operations and results during fiscal year. Work by hired labor consisted of engineering and design studies. Preparation of Phase I GDM is 80 percent complete. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction has not begun. 43. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD DAMAGE PREVENTION PROJECTS Various hurricane protection projects, as well as small flood damage prevention projects, were inspected during fiscal year 1981. Additionally, inspection of completed flood damage prevention projects along the Red River from the northern boundary of the District to Alexandria, La., was included in the joint annual inspection with local interests in 1981. Floodfight sectors included in this area are the Arkansas, Shreveport, and Middle Red which contain a total of 438 miles of levee. Also, periodic inspection and continuing evaluation of completed civil works structures was conducted in accordance with ER 1110-2-100, at various times during the year on an asneeded basis. Fiscal year costs for the period were $199,727. Total costs to Sep. 30, 1981, were $872,392. 44. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD DAMAGE PREVENTION PROJECTS See Table 11-I. 45. FLOOD DAMAGE PREVENTION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Disaster preparedness, fiscal year costs for the period were $173,519. Emergency Operations: Public Law 84-99-1979 Flood, $28,696; Advance measures, Lower Urania, $223,036. Total costs to Sep. 30, 1981 were $425,251. General Investigations 46. ACTIVE INVESTIGATIONS See Table 11-J which covers: Surveys, Collections and study of basic data, and Research and Development activities. 11-23 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 11-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Funds to in Text Project Funding FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 Sep. 30, 1981 1. Aquatic Plant Control Program, La. 2. Atchafalaya River Bayous Chene, Boeuf, and Black, La. (Contrib. Funds) 3. Atchafalaya River, Morgan City to Gulf of Mexico, La. New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost 4. Barataria Bay New Work Approp. Cost 5. Bayou Lafourche and Lafourche- Jump Waterway, La. 6. Bayou Teche & Vermilion River, La 7. Bayou Teche, La. 8. Calcasieu River and Pass, La. (Contrib. Funds) 9. Calcasieu River at Devil's Elbow, La. (Regular Funds) (Contrib. Funds) Maint Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost $ 430,000 480,366 3,550,000 5,399,844 13,183 $ 350,000 251,882 -148,000 557,845 140,000 53,756 $ 445,000 $ 450,000 549,853 424,684 550,000 15,500,000 351,901 15,644,334 138,866 186,100 4,399,847 1,202,100 333,474 3,285,162 2,299,847 1,955,000 3,745,000 1,962,048 3,728,252 4,865 10,000 43,420 92,000 96,441 1,416 75,000 56,227 80,000 79,905 184,220 182,149 -30,600 199 125,970 131,865 116,910 123,167 785,000 7,133,700 10,552,980 790,760 6,000,937 8,699,203 - - 282,774 _ _-_ 800,000 1,141,513 65,000 315,000 -100,000 757 -3,800 1,746 628,000 630,835 3,565,000 3,576,990 305,000 307,580 2,817 40,000 55,498 137,000 128,135 8,285,000 11,262,008 155,000 437,774 3,209 11-24 $ 8,582,460 8,554,780 29,700,000 29,573,5291 1,335,062 1,333,272" 501,963 501,963 22,221,981 22,214,820 1,572,6854 1,572,6854 11,026,8565 10,979,6155 1,624,4246 1,624,4246 829,756' 829,7567 2,891,922 2,891,922 1,588,724 1,588,434 754.330" 754,330 ' 3,397,585 3,382,697 27,807,310' 27,807,3101" 63,561,74911 63,491,1071 437,774 437,774 5,856,200 5,856,199 798,000 798,000 NEW ORLEANS, LA., DISTRICT TABLE 11-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) See Section Total Funds to in Text Project Funding FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 Sep. 30, 1981 10. Freshwater Bayou, La. 11. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway between Apalachee Bay, Fla. & Mexican Border (New Orleans Dist.) 12. Houma Navigation Canal, La. 13. Mermentau River, La. 14. Mississippi River, Baton Rouge to the Gulf of Mexico, La. 15. Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet, La. (Regular Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 16. Mississippi River Outlets, Venice, La. 17. Overton-Red River Waterway, La. 18. Petit Anse, Tigre & Carlin Bayous, La. New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 1,655,000 1,844,493 124,610 68,448 7,715,000 9,741,813 1,337,000 1,343,714 666,000 671,115 1,900,000 609,017 21,829,762 22,192,814 800,000 950,840 535,750 2,665,265 516,166 1,825,010 9,125,000 7,932,967 187,000 198,625 -70,000 7,699 568,000 577,079 600,000 1,824,884 24,220,000 23,982,648 1,235,000 1,810,701 7,660,000 7,122,203 1,350,000 1,344,029 29,204 501,250 623,433 910,000 658,241 27,363,000 27,449,447 1,300,000 901,609 4,453,000 7,090,000 1,572,500 4,419,158 7,142,983 1,522,856 - - -_ 4,230,000 1,071,000 4,918,214 4,317,998 - 185,000 - 69,814 1,350,000 1,320,000 637,591 2,061,382 - 50,000 - 29,158 -14,000 36,320 892,800 1,004,548 5,600,000 5,763,945 100,000 108,118 ' - 814,000 1,392,685 4,875,000 6,837,829 2,540,000 2,505,334 3,766 700,000 743,669 884,800 977,150 24,122,100 24,581,150 1,780,000 1,758,067 7,109,200 7,134,791 16,900 196,000 190,910 3,419,000 3,283,472 -5,000 7,724 $ 7,116,224 '2 7,116,22412 10,523,765 10,221,887 63,654,53513' 14, 15 63,284,47013,4 15 121,662,14616 18 121,571,85217,18 10,833,734 10,787,297 4,561,910' 9 4,672,57919 10,728,41220 10,717,5642 39,211,7972' 38,986,28921 279,617,06422 24 279,445,74023, 24 75,400,000 74,931,462 61,714,580 61,679,146 1,118,977"5 1,118,97725 10,010,993 10,008,338 1,273,800 1,265,272 22,452,522 22,288,389 537,2472" 537,247 " 811,172 811,172 11-25 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 11-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) See Section Total Funds to in Text Project Funding FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 Sep. 30, 1981 19. Red River Emergency Bank Protection (Contrib. Funds) 20. Red River Waterway- Mississippi River to Shreveport, La. (Contrib. Funds) 21. Removing Water- Hyancinth, La. 22. Tangipahoa River, La. 23. Vermilion Lock, La. (Replacement of lock) 24. Waterway from Empire, La., to Gulf of Mexico 25. Waterway from Intracoastal Waterways to Bayou Dulac, La (Bayou Grand Caillou & LeCarpe, La.) 28. Bayou Bodcau and tributaries, Ark. & La. 29. Bayou Bodcau Reservoir, La. 30. Bayou Pierre, La. New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost $ 1,970,000 2,224,233 6,500 6,500 28,250,000 32,695,354 547,000 587,260 194,887 194,887 1,125,000 1,116,042 20,000 18,855 124,610 68,448 113,000 93,353 $ 1,600,000 2,972,625 325 325 51,000,000 51,787,486 629,350 62,595 71,854 70,631 1,200,000 1,237,031 190,103 191,547 800,000 108,708 164,497 182,576 - 34,250 - 22,639 - -1,000,000 147,242 91,593 274,000 335,954 15,000 29,041 205,600 195,945 15,000 10,858 $ 5,000,000 $ 5,890,000 5,037,194 5,917,017 66,700,000 88,500,000 66,088,853 74,633,085 36,497 210,986 216,720 217,943 1,163,000 984,300 20,840 20,833 50,000 389,709 -3,352 -1,783 190,000 39,613 300,000 129,196 275,050 265,025 9,370 14,142 11-26 1,015,000 1,382,191 976,000 1,177,002 159,000 158,404 495,200 544,814 $ 40,948,000 40,790,224 6,825 6,825 295,688,000 279,704,543 3,373,147 3,345,447 483,461 483,461 16,577,608 16,576,098 568,154 567,551 1,845,2102 1,773,1762 1,068,142 1,068,142 835,251 835,252 164,622 166,864 688,762 687,290 3,907,000 3,805,350 4,208,417 4,208,417 2,657,807 2,628,127 299,52928 299,5298 540,080 539,848 35,000 37,242 135,000 295,526 120,000 274,326 370,000 365,191 21,000 20,768 NEW ORLEANS, LA., DISTRICT TABLE 11-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) See Section Total Funds to in Text Project Funding FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 Sep. 30, 1981 31. Brush Bayou, La (Contrib. Funds) 32. Caddo Lake, La. 33. Grand Isle and Vicinity, La. 34. Lake Pontchartrain and vicinity, La. (Hurricane Protection) (Regular Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 35. Larose to Golden Meadow, La. (Hurricane Protection) (Contrib. Funds) 36. McKinney Bayou, Ark., and Tex. 37. Mississippi River Delta at and below New Orleans, La. (New Orleans to Venice, La., Hurricane Protection) (Regular Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 39. Red River below Denison Dam, Levees and Bank Stabilization (New Orleans Dist.) 40. Red River Waterway, Shreveport, La., to Index, Ark. 41. Wallace Lake, La. New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost $ 185,000 17,887 $ -65,000 35,853 $ -120,000 20,177 49,424 117,000 96,987 162,500 161,471 7,500,000 4,857,441 275,000 55,405 2,700,000 3,020,358 390,000 390,000 100,000 93,190 1,940,000 2,558,475 80,000 69,662 200,000 186,352 230,000 7,363,786 165,710 385,710 1,570,000 1,464,274 100,000 101,081 200,000 334,797 $ 18 19 46 49 91,860 115,636 182,000 174,535 13,320,000 12,672,174 209,400 122,400 2,885,000 2,931,867 298,721 218,191 155,000 118,085 638,000 534,233 - - 86,569 3,260,000 2,000,000 4,365,000 2,483,689 1,026,898 5,568,162 185,000 224,347 108,000 166,683 220,000 212,351 80,000 82,129 150,000 112,393 160,740 162,454 12 11 10 11 8,80 8,81 2,000 $ 966,660 4,071 939,9681" 0,000 830,200 6,062 827,286 - 3,587,143 - 3,587,143 7,000 415,860 9,642 401,927 )0,000 644,500 1,558 633,922 )0,000 114,564,000 1,248 113,349,680 140,950 205,564 815,000 1,075,688 1,101,000 1,146,938 255.000 284,162 1,830,000 1,994,914 2,000,000 1,067,597 23,000 94,340 133,000 132,832 2,811,060 2,788,674 14,432,000 14,394,85430 2,089,721 2,055,129 1,622,263 1,617,781 43,654,000 43,278,445 366,430 366,430 48,010,000"' 47,016,54131 688,000 683,942 1,219,371 1,219,371 1,439,440 1,427,378 11-27 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 11-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) See Section Total Funds to in Text Project Funding FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 Sep. 30, 1981 42. West Agurs, La. New Work Approp. $ - $ - $ 50,000 $ 137,000 $ 187,000 Cost - - 48,939 101,334 150,273 1. Includes $37,348 for advance engineering and design. 2. Includes allotment of $340,000 for Code 300. 3. Includes expenditures of $335,375 for Code 300. 4. Includes $73,037 for previous project. Excludes $2,000 contributed funds expended. 5. Includes $47,551 for previous project. 6. Includes $252,935 for previous projects; excludes $75,563 expended for rehabilitation (Code 820) in Fiscal Year 1961. 7. Includes $15,445 for previous projects. 8. Includes $45,704 for previous projects. 9. Includes $91,389 permanent indefinite appropriation. 10. Includes $495,914 for previous project; excludes $107,837 expended for minor rehabilitation in Fiscal Year 1963. 11. Includes $194,851 for previous project. 12. Excludes $16,060 contributed funds. 13. Includes $4,320,698 for new work on previous project. Included in these totals are $353,541 N.I.R.A. funds (new work); and $1,070,433 permanent indefinite appropriation. Included is repayment of advance funds for construction of Franklin Canal in the amount of $35,103. In addition, $1,413,133 was expended for transfer to drainage district of ownership of Plaquemines Parish pumping station, and drainage canals and all drainage responsibility and obligations vested in the United States by Public Law 14, 79th Cong., 1st sess. 14. Excludes contributed funds of $340,159. 15. Inner Harbor Navigation Canal Lock was constructed at a cost of $8,648,492 (non-Federal). 16. Does not include allotment of $60,000 (9613123). 17. Does not include expenditures of $36,630 (9613123). 18. Includes $454,259 for maintenance and $548,948 for operation and care for previous project, including $75,000 from appropriation for maintenance and operation of dam and other improvements of navigable waters. Excludes $7,005 contributed funds. 19. Excludes $10,904 for new work on White Lake to Pecan Island section of existing project. 20. Excludes $10,742 for maintenance on White Lake to Pecan Island section of existing project. Excludes $2,000 contributed funds. Includes $13,163 of R&H funds and $109,714 accelerated Public Works Act funds. 21. Includes $1,729,989 for previous project. 22. Does not include allotment of $40,000 (9613123). 23. Does not include expenditures of $63,370 (9613123). 24. Includes $169,055 for previous projects and $3,379,676 from permanent indefinite appropriation. 25. Contributed by Board of Commissioners, Port of New Orleans, for providing fill for future industrial sites adjacent to turning basin and for dredging cable and pipeline crossings. 26. Includes $47,858 accelerated Public Works Act funds. 27. Includes AE&D funds for replacement of Vermilion Lock. 28. Includes $38,529 from emergency relief funds. 29. Includes $80,500 for preauthorized studies. 30. Includes $67,823 for advance engineering and design. 31. Includes $212,105 expended by Tulsa District for cost of Index, Ark., Tex. unit. Excludes $100,000 contributed funds expended. 11-28 NEW ORLEANS, LA., DISTRICT TABLE 11-B AUTHORIZING LEGLISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Jul. 3, 1958 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 27, 1965 Aug. 13,1968 Water Resources Development Act, Mar.7, 1974 Jun. 25, 1910 Jul. 3, 1958 Aug. 30, 1935 Jul. 14, 1960 Nov. 22, 1967 Aug. 18, 1941 AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL PROGRAM, LA. (See Sec. 1 of Text) Control and progressive eradication of water-hyacinth alligatorweed, and other obnoxious aquatic plant growth from navigable waters in tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters in southeastern United States. Research and planning costs prior to construction to be borne fully by the United States and not included in costs shared by local interests. Provides for comprehensive program for control and progressive eradication of water-hyacinth, alligatorweed, Eurasian water milfoil, and other obnoxious plant growths from navigable waterways, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters of the United States. ATCHAFALAYA RIVER, BAYOUS CHENE, BOEUF, AND BLACK, LA. (See Sec. 2 of Text) 20- by 400-foot navigation channels connecting Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, Gulf of Mexico, and Bayous Chene, Boeuf, and Black. The non-Federal interests shall contribute 25 percentum of the costs of areas required for initial and subsequent disposal of spoil, and of necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads, and embankments therefor. This requirement shall be waived if applicable waste treatment facilities are constructed and water quality standards are not being violated. ATCHAFALAYA RIVER, MORGAN CITY TO GULF OF MEXICO, LA.(See Sec. 3 of Text) A 20- by 200-foot channel from 20-foot contour in Gulf of Mexico. BARATARIA BAY WATERWAY, LA. (See Sec. 4 of Text) A channel about 37 miles long with a 12-foot depth and 125-foot width from Gulf Intracoastal Waterway to Grand Isle, La., to mile 15.5 in Bayou St. Denis; a channel along western shore of Barataria Bay and through Barataria Pass to 12-foot depth contour in the gulf, with an extension of project to include westerly 4.3 miles of Bayou Rigaud. BAYOU LAFOURCHE AND LAFOURCHE-JUMP WATERWAY, LA. (See Sec. 5 of Text) Permanent closure of head of bayou, without a lock; a channel 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide from Gulf Intracoastal Waterway at Larose to Gulf of Mexico by Belle Pass; closure of Pass Fourchon; and a jettied entrance at mouth of Bell Pass. Auxiliary channel 12 by 125 feet from Gulf Intracoastal Waterway (mile 37.2) to Bayou Lafourche vicinity Leeville 12- by 125-foot channel improvement in Bayou Lafourche from Leeville to 12-foot contour in Gulf of Mexico; 9- by 100-foot channel improvement in Bayou Lafourche from Leeville to Golden Meadow; 12- by 125-foot channel from Leeville through Southwestern Louisiana Canal to and through Bayou Rigaud; and restore and extend jetties from 6- 12-foot contour when justified to effect reduction in maintenance dredging. Bayou Lafourche, between Canal Boulevard in Thibodaux, Lafourche Parish, La., and the head of the bayou at its junction with the Mississippi River levee at Donaldsonville, Ascension Parish, La, is declared nonnavigable. BAYOU TECHE AND VERMILION RIVER, LA. (See Sec. 6 of Text) A navigable channel 51 miles long and 8 by 80 feet from 8-foot-depth contour in Vermilion Bay to Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, thence 9 by 100 feet to head of navigation (mile 52) at Lafayette, La, with additional enlargment below Abbeville necessary to provide adequate capacity for flood flows. H. Doc. 37, 85th Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 874, 87th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 298, 89th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 155, 90th Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 93-251. Sec. 58, 93rd Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 669, 61st Cong., 2d sess.' H. Doc. 82, 85th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 45, 73d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 112, 86th Cong. 1st sess. 2 Public Law 90-149. S. Doc. 93, 77th Cong., 1st sess.2 11-29 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 11-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Acts Work Authorized Documents Sep. 19, 1890 Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 2, 1919 Jun. 26, 19344 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 24, 1946 Jul. 14, 1960 Adopted by Committee Resolutions Dec. 15, 1970, and Dec. 17, 1970s Jul. 14, 1960 Mar. 3, 1925 Jan. 21, 1927 BAYOU TECHE, LA. (See Sec. 7 of Text) Improve stream from its mouth to St. Martinville by removing obstructions and dredging. Construct lock and dam and extend improvement to Arnaudville, La. Increase channel dimensions from mouth to Keystone Lock. Operation and care of lock and dam provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors. CALCASIEU RIVER AND PASS, LA. (See Sec. 8 of Text) Channel 30 by 250 feet from Lake Charles docks to gulf, repair and extend existing jetties to about 10-foot-depth contour, with a channel 30 by 250 feet between jetties; dredging approach channel 32 by 400 feet in gulf from sea ends of jetties to 32-foot-depth contour; and provision for extension of jetties to 15-foot-depth contour, if such action would be more economical than maintenance of approach channel by dredging. Channel 30 by 250 feet around Clooney Island. Channel depth of 35 feet from wharves of Lake Charles Harbor and terminal district, including Clooney Island Loop, to jetty channel, a uniformly increasing depth of 35 to 37 feet in jetty channel, and a depth of 37 feet in approach channel in Gulf of Mexico. An approach channel 42 by 800 feet from end of jetty to 42-foot contour in gulf; a jetty channel 400 feet wide, varying from 40 feet deep at shoreline to 42 feet deep at seaward end of jetty; a channel 40 by 400 feet from shoreline (mile 0) to Port of Lake Charles (mile 34.4); enlarge existing turning basin at mile 29.6 to 40 feet deep; a mooring basin (mile 3) 350 by 2,000 by 40 feet; a 35- by 250-foot extension of existing ship channel from Port of Lake Charles (mile 34.4) to vicinity of U. S. Highway 90 Bridge; a turning basin at upper terminus, 750 by 1,000 by 35 feet; and maintenance of 12- by 200-foot channel from ship channel to Cameron, La. CALCASIEU RIVER AT DEVIL'S ELBOW, LA. (See Sec. 9 of Text) A channel 40 by 400 feet for 2.8 miles and a turning basin at the head 40 by 1,000 feet and 1,000 feet long. FRESHWATER BAYOU, LA. (See Sec. 10 of Text) A new 12- by 125-foot channel from Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, mile 161.2 west of Harvey Lock to 12-foot contour in Gulf of Mexico near Freshwater Bayou; construction of an 84- by 600-foot lock with a depth of 16 feet over sill near Gulf of Mexico; and construction of jetties from shoreline to 6-foot-depth contour in Gulf of Mexico, if maintenance dredging of channel without jetties proves to be more expensive than construction and maintenance of jetties. Until such determination has been made, offshore channel should be dredged and maintained to provide a 12- by 250-foot channel. In event jetties are provided, offshore section should then be maintained to 12- by 125-foot project in jettied reach, and 250 feet beyond. GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN APALACHEE BAY, FLA., AND MEXICAN BORDER (NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT) (See Sec. 11 of Text) Construct waterway from New Orleans, La., to Galveston Bay, Tex. Extension of waterway to Corpus Christi, Tex. Annual Report, 1889, p. 1532. H. Doc. 527, 59th Cong.. 1st sess. H. Doc. 1329, 62d Cong., 3d sess.3 H. Doc. 299, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 465, 77th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 190, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 436, 86th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 111, 91st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 435, 86th Cong., 2d sess. 2 H. Doc. 238, 68th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 238, 68th Cong., 1st sess. 11-30 NEW ORLEANS, LA., DISTRICT TABLE 11-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Acts Work Authorized Documents Jul. 3, 1930 Jun. 26, 19344 Jul. 23, 1942 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 24, 1946 Jul. 24, 1946 Jul. 24, 1946 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 22, 1976 Oct. 23, 1962 Aug. 18, 1941 Jul. 24, 1946 Mar. 2, 1945 A channel 9 by 100 feet from Lake Pontchartrain to Mississippi Sound. Operation and care of locks and dams provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors. Enlarge waterway from 9 by 100 feet to 12 by 125 feet from Apalachee Bay, Fla., to Corpus Christi, Tex., and its extension to vicinity of Mexican border, except between Mobile Bay, Ala., and New Orleans, La, where width shall be 150 feet; and rental of Inner Harbor Navigation Canal facilities. Alternative connection with Mississippi River in vicinity of Algiers at New Orleans. Enlarge and extend Plaquemine-Morgan City route from Mississippi-Atchafalaya section of waterway, in vicinity of Morgan City, to and through a new terminal lock and entrance channel to Mississippi River in vicinity of Port Allen, opposite lower limit of Port of Baton Rouge. Restore, improve, and maintain Franklin Canal as a terminal branch channel, 8 by 60 feet, from its confluence with Gulf Intracoastal Waterway to Franklin, La. A salt-water guard lock in waterway at mile 238 west of Harvey Lock. Enlarge waterway to 16 by 150 feet from Mississippi River to Atchafalaya River, except in vicinity of Houma (mile 50.5 to 63.5); of Houma bypass (mile 50.5 to 63.5) and of Algiers alternative canal; and enlarge waterway from Atchafalaya River to Sabine River to 16 by 200 feet. Replacement of Vermilion Lock, in accordance with the recommendations of the Chief of Engineers in the report dated Aug. 3, 1976, recommending a lock size of 110 feet wide by 1,200 feet long by 15 feet deep. HOUMA NAVIGATION CANAL, LA. (See Sec. 12 of Text) Assumption of maintenance and operation of Houma Navigation Canal, constructed by Terrebonne Parish, to dimensions of 15 by 150 feet. MERMENTAU RIVER, LA. (See Sec. 13 of Text) Channel enlargment, lower Mermentau River, from mile 15 to Gulf of Mexico, and construction of a lock and control spillway at Catfish Point, mile 24. Channel enlargement; lower Mermentau River below Grand Lake, mile 25; construct a gated-control structure at or near Grand Cheniere, mile 7; enlarge and realine Inland Waterway from Franklin, La, to Mermentau River, La, from Vermilion Bay to White Lake, via new channel, and from White Lake to Grand Lake; enlarge channel of North Prong of Schooner Bayou; construct a gated-control structure in new channel near Schooner Bayou lock; and include project "Waterway from White Lake to Pecan Island, La," and portion of project "Inland Waterway from Franklin, La., to Mermentau River," west of Vermilion Bay in modified project "Mermentau River, La." MISSISSIPPI RIVER, BATON ROUGE TO GULF OF MEXICO, LA. (See Sec. 14 of Text) Combines projects of Mississippi River, Baton Rouge to New Orleans, Mississippi River, South Pass, and Southwest Pass, adding thereto project for Mississippi River from New Orleans to Head of Passes, to provide a single project, "Mississippi River, Baton Rouge to the Gulf of Mexico," with channel dimensions as follows: Baton Rouge to New Orleans, 35 by 500 feet; port limits of New Orleans, 35 by 1,500 feet; New Orleans to Head of Passes, 40 by 1,000 feet, Southwest Pass, 40 by 800 feet; Southwest Pass Bar Channel, 40 by 600 feet; South Pass, 30 by 450 feet; South Pass Bar Channel, 30 by 600 feet. 11-31 H. Doc. 341, 71st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 96, 79th Cong., 1st sess.; H. Doc. 230, 76th Cong., 1st sess. 6 S. Doc. 188, 78th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 242, 79th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 189, 79th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 231, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 556, 87th Cong., 2d sess. Sec. 114 Water Resources Development Act of 1976 (PL 94- 587) 2d sess. H. Doc. 583, 87th Cong., 2d sess.2 S. Doc. 94, 77th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 231, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 215, 76th Cong., 1st sess.2 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 11-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Acts Oct. 23, 1962 Mar. 29, 1956 Oct. 22, 1976 Aug. 13, 1968 Jul. 24, 1946 May 17, 1950 Aug. 13, 1968 Aug. 30, 19358 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Jun. 30, 1948 Jul. 14, 1960 Adopted by Committee Resolutions Sep. 23 and Oct. 1, 19766 Work Authorized Deepen existing channel from 35 to 40 feet by 500 feet wide from one-tenth mile below Louisiana Highway Commission bridge at Baton Rouge to upper limits of Port of New Orleans, and also 40 by 500 feet within presently authorized 35- by 1,500-foot channel in port limits of New Orleans. MISSISSIPPI RIVER-GULF OUTLET, LA. (See Sec. 15 of Text) Construct a seaway canal 36 feet deep and 500 feet wide from Michoud to 38-foot contour in gulf and an inner tidewater harbor consisting of a 1,000- by 2,000-foot turning basin 36 feet deep and a connecting channel 36 feet deep and 500 feet wide to Inner Harbor Navigation Canal and provides, when economically justified, for construction of a lock to Mississippi River in the vicinity of Meraux, La. Amends above Act making the construction of bridge relocations a Federal responsibility when required by the construction of the Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet channel. MISSISSIPPI RIVER OUTLETS, VENICE, LA. (See Sec. 16 of Text) Enlargement of existing channels of Baptiste Collette Bayou and Grand-Tiger Passes to 14 by 150 feet with 16 by 250-foot entrance channels in open water and jetties, if justified. OVERTON-RED RIVER WATERWAY, LA. (See Sec. 17 of Text) Construct 9- by 100-foot channel for 206 miles from Mississippi River, mile 301 AHP, through Old and Red Rivers to mile 31, thence by lateral canal through land cuts and existing waterways across Mississippi-Red River backwater area along south bank of Red River floodplain to Shreveport, and construct nine locks and pumping plant on Red River near Shreveport. Extend Overton-Red River Waterway 9- by 100-foot channel from Mississippi River to north bank of Black River, mile 35.5. Provides for the navigation channel to be 200 feet wide. PETIT ANSE, TIGRE, AND CARLIN BAYOUS, LA. (See Sec. 18 of Text) A channel in Bayou Petit Anse 60 feet wide and 9 feet deep from Intracoastal Waterway to a point 3.2 miles upstream, thence 40 feet wide and 5 feet deep to highway bridge at head of Avery Island; and a channel in Bayou Carlin 40 feet wide and 5 feet deep from Bayou Petit Anse to Lake Peigneur. A channel in Bayou Petit Anse 9 feet deep and 80 feet wide from Intracoastal Waterway to north end of Avery Island and a channel 5 feet deep and 40 feet wide from Intracoastal Waterway to Vermilion Bay by way of McIlhenny Canal (Avery Canal). A channel in Bayou Carlin 9 feet deep and 80 feet wide from Bayou Petit Anse to Lake Peigneur. Protecting piers of railway bridge crossing Bayou Carlin at Delcambre, La. A harbor of refuge at Delcambre and a channel 7 feet deep and 60 feet wide from Gulf Intracoastal Waterway via McIlhenny Canal (Avery Canal) to deep water in Vermilion Bay. A new vertical lift railroad bridge over Bayou Carlin and channel improvements in Bayous Petit Anse and Carlin. Documents S. Doc. 36, 87th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 245, 82d Cong., 1st sess. Sec. 186, Water Resources Development Act of 1976 (PL 94-587) 2d sess. H. Doc. 361, 90th Cong., 2d sess.2 H. Doc. 320, 80th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 117, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 304, 90th Cong., 2d sess. 7 H. Doc. 225, 72d Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee, Doc. 40, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 594, 78th Cong., 2d sess.2 Public Law 858, 80th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 70, 85th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 480, 94th Cong., 2d sess. 11-32 NEW ORLEANS, LA., DISTRICT TABLE 11-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Acts Work Authorized Documents Aug. 13, 1968 Aug. 13, 1968 Mar. 3, 1899 Jun. 13, 1902 Jul. 25, 1912 Jun. 10, 1872 Jun 14, 1880 Jul. 14, 1960 WRD Act of 1976, dated Oct. 22, 1976 (PL 94-587) Jul. 24, 1946 Aug. 30, 1935 Oct. 23, 1962 RED RIVER EMERGENCY BANK PROTECTION (See Sec. 19 of Text) Realining the banks by dredging cut-offs and training works and stabilizing banks by means of revetments and dikes. RED RIVER WATERWAY-MISSISSIPPI RIVER TO SHREVEPORT, LA. (See Sec. 20 of Text) Develop a 9 by 200 feet. approximately 210 miles long from Mississippi River at junction of Old River via Old River and Red River to Shreveport, La., consisting of realinement, bank stabilization, and construction of five locks and dams. REMOVING WATER-HYACINTH, LA. (See Sec. 21 of Text) Appropriations for Florida and Louisiana for extermination or removal of plants, building of boats, and establishment of booms. Authorized use of mechanical, chemical, or other means whatsoever. Made appropriation available for State of Mississippi and also made available for use in that State operating plant pertaining to work in Louisiana. TANGIPAHOA RIVER, LA. (See Sec. 22 of Text) Improvement, without dredging, by removing overhanging trees, snags, and obstructions to navigation from Wells to mouth. Present project above entrance channel. 8- by 100-foot entrance channel from 8-foot depth contour in Lake Pontchartrain to 8-foot depth in River. VERMILION LOCK, LA. (REPLACEMENT OF LOCK) (See Sec. 23 of Text) A replacement lock, 110 feet wide and 1,200 feet long, to accommodate present and projected marine traffic. WATERWAY FROM EMPIRE, LA., TO GULF OF MEXICO (See Sec. 24 of Text) Construction and maintenance of a waterway 10 miles long from State-owned canal and lock at Empire, La., to Gulf of Mexico, to provide a channel 9 by 80 feet and for initial construction of rubblestone jetties inshore of 6-footdepth contour, with landward extensions thereof as required to prevent flanking, and for seaward extensions to 9-foot-depth contour if and when it becomes apparent that such extensions will be more economical than maintenance dredging of entrance channel. WATERWAY FROM INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY TO BAYOU DULAC, LA. (Bayous Grand Caillou and LeCarpe, La.) (See Sec. 25 of Text) Channel 5 by 40 feet from Intracoastal Waterway at Houma through Bayou LeCarpe, Bayou Pelton, and Bayou Grand Caillou to Bayou Dulac, about 16.3 miles. Channel 10 by 45 feet in Bayou LeCarpe from Gulf Intracoastal Waterway to Houma navigation canal. H. Doc. 304, 90th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 304, 90th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 91, 55th Cong., 3d sess. H. Ex. Doc. 54, 46th Cong., 2d sess., and Annual Report, 1871, p. 553. Annual Report, 1879, p. 946. Authorized by Chief of Engineers Jul. 28, 1967, under Sec. 107 of 1960 River and Harbor, Act, as amended. Approved by Secretary of the Army, May 1967, under authority of the R&H Act of 1909. H. Doc. 697, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 206, 72d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 583, 87th Cong., 2d sess.' 11-33 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 11-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Acts Work Authorized Documents BAYOU BODCAU AND TRIBUTARIES, ARK. AND LA. (See Sec. 28 of Text) Extend Cypress Bayou-Red Chute Bayou levee, construct stream closure landside drainage channel and three culverts on Red Chute Bayou, and clearing and snagging channel; extend Flat River-Loggy Bayou levee, close Flat River near junction with Cutoff Bayou, and construct control structures on Flat River near junction with Red Chute Bayou; and enlarge Flat River channel to 20 to 35 feet, a distance of 11.6 miles. BAYOU BODCAU RESERVOIR, LA. (See Sec. 29 of Text) Provides for construction of a reservoir and other flood control works. BAYOU PIERRE, LA. (See Sec. 30 of Text) Widening channel at intervals totaling 12.9 miles, and snagging of 29.7 miles. BRUSH BAYOU, LA. (See Sec. 31 of Text) Enlargement and alinement of existing channel between (mile 1.20) and (mile 7.42), a distance of 6.22 miles. Bottom widths for the improved channel vary from 100 feet at mile 1.20 to 20 feet at mile 7.42. CADDO LAKE, LA. (See Sec. 32 of Text) Oct. 27, 1965 Maintenance work. Adopted by Committee Resolutions Sep. 23, 1976, and Oct. 1, 19765 Oct. 27, 1965 Oct. 27, 1965 Oct. 22, 1976 Oct. 23, 1962 GRAND ISLE AND VICINITY, LA. (See Sec. 33 of Text) To provide hurricane protection by placement of a berm and vegetated dune extending the length of Grand Isle's gulf shore and a jetty to stabilize the western end of the island at Caminada Pass. LAKE PONTCHARTRAIN AND VICINITY, LA. (HURRICANE PROTECTION) (See Sec. 34 of Text) Control of hurricane tides by construction of two independent units, the Lake Pontchartrain Barrier plan and the Chalmette Area plan. LAROSE TO GOLDEN MEADOW, LA. (HURRICANE PROTECTION) (See Sec. 35 of Text) A loop levee about 36 miles long along both banks of Bayou Lafourche from Golden Meadow to Larose; enlargement of 3 miles of existing levee at Golden Meadow; floodgates for navigation and hurricane protection in Bayou Lafourche at upper and lower bayou crossings; about 8 miles of low interior levees to regulate intercepted drainage; and seven multibarreled culverts controlled by flapgates. MCKINNEY BAYOU, ARK. AND TEX. (See Sec. 36 of Text) Provides: channel enlargement of McKinney Bayou; outlet channels to Red River; interior drainage channels; and four flood flow structures by USDA. NEW ORLEANS TO VENICE, LA., HURRICANE PROTECTION (See Sec. 37 of Text) Improvements along Mississippi River below New Orleans, La., for prevention of hurricane tidal flood damages by increasing heights of existing back levees and modifying existing drainage facilities where necessary in five separate reaches. H. Doc. 203, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 378, 74th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 378, 74th Cong., 2d sess. Approved Sep. 6, 1973, under authority of Sec. 205, Flood Control Act of 1948, as ammended. S. Doc. 39, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 639, 94th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 231, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 184, 89th Cong., 1st sess. 2 H. Doc. 647, 94th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 550, 87th Cong., 2d sess. 11-34 Oct. 27, 1965 Jun. 28, 1938 Jun. 22, 1936 Jun. 30, 1948 NEW ORLEANS, LA., DISTRICT TABLE 11-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Acts Work Authorized Documents RED RIVER BELOW DENISON DAM, LEVEES AND BANK STABILIZATION (NEW ORLEANS DIST.) (See Sec. 39 of Text) Jul. 24, 1946 Levee and bank stabilization. H. Doc. 602, 79th Cong., 2d sess. Aug. 13, 1968 Deauthorization of Morringsport Dam and Reservoir on H. Doc. 304, 90th Cong., Cypress Creek; realining and stabilizing the banks of the 2d sess. Red River; and recreational facilities from the Mississippi River to Denison Dam, Okla. and Tex. RED RIVER WATERWAY-SHREVEPORT, LA., TO INDEX, ARK. (See Sec. 40 of Text) Aug. 13, 1968 Provides for realinement of the channels of the Red River H. Doc. 304, 90th Cong., from Shreveport, La., to Index, Ark. 2d sess. WALLACE LAKE, LA. (See Sec. 41 of Text) Jun. 22, 1936 Construction of an earth-fill dam and a reservoir. H. Doc. 378, 74th Cong., 2d sess. WEST AGURS, LA. (See Sec. 42 of Text) Oct. 18, 1976 Provides for the installation of 232 relief wells excavated on H. Doc. 647, 94th Cong., centers 50 feet apart along the bottom for the entire 2d sess. length of the existing drainage canal on the landside of West Agurs Levee. 1. For latest published map, see H. Doc. 410, 56th Cong., 1st sess. 6. Not mentioned in authorizing act. 2. Contains latest published map. 7. Portion of existing project above mile 31 was reclassified to 3. For latest published map, see H. Doc. 288, 66th Cong., 1st sess. inactive status as approved by Office, Chief of Engineers, letter dated 4. Permanent Appropriation Repeal Act. Oct. 18, 1971. 5. Authorized under provision of Sec. 201 of Flood Control Act of 8. Included in Public Works Administration Program, Sep. 6, 1965. 1933. TABLE 11-C BAYOU TECHE, LA., LOCKS (See Sec. 7 of Text) Pertinent Data Keystone Lock Berwick Lock Miles from 18 (New Iberia) 1.7 (Berwick, La.) Miles from 82.5 (Intracoastal Waterway) 9 (Below mouth of Bayou Teche) Width of chamber 36 feet 45 feet Length available for full width 160 feet 300 feet Lift 8 feet 0-14.5 feet Depth on miter sill at mean low gulf level 8 feet 9 Character of foundation Timber piles Timber piles Kind of dam Timber, rockfill Type of construction Concrete Reinforced concrete Completed 1913 September 1951 Open to navigation November 1950 Cost $257,720 $2,100,000 11-35 TABLE 11-D GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN APALACHEE BAY, FLA., AND MEXICAN BORDER (NEW ORLEANS DIST.)--LOCKS (See Sec. 11 of Text) Pertinent Data Algiers Lock Miles from 7 New Orleans, La. (Canal St.) Miles below - Lake Charles, La Miles from - Abbeville, La. I. 1-- F-1 Type of construction Kind of dam Bayou Bayou Boeuf Sorrel Lock Lock 96.6 (via Har- 135 (via Harvey Lock) vey Lock) Pertinent Data Inner Harbor Plaque- Calcasieu Harvey Navigation mine Port Allen Vermilion Lock Lock Canal Lock Lock Lock Lock - 3.3 2.9 - 132.5 16.6 26 0.38 56.7 (via Plaqueminc Lock) 18 (via 0.13 e Plaquemine Lock) 0.6 0.23 0.5 1.75 75 feet - 56 feet - 75 feet 75 feet - 75 feet - 75 feet - - 800 feet 1,156 feet 797 feet 1,206 feet 425 feet 640 feet 0-18 feet 0-11.3 feet 0-21 feet 0-4 feet 0-19.6 feet 0-17.4 feet 13 feet 13 feet 14 feet 13 feet 12 feet 13.5 feet (miter sill) (miter sill) Timber Concrete slab Timber piles Concrete Timber piles Timber piles piles on medium of slab on prestiff clay constructed stiff clay Reinforced Reinforced Reinforced Reinforced Reinforced Reinforced concrete concrete gate concrete gate concrete concrete concrete bays and earth bays and earth gate bays chamber chamber and earth chamber 84 feet - - 56 feet 1,202 feet 1,182 feet 0-45 feet 0-5 feet (either direction) 13.75 feet 11.3 feet (miter sill) Concrete slab Timber piles on clay Reinforced Reinforced concrete concrete - Reinforced concrete spillway dam, vertical cast steel gates, timber pile foundation Miles from Mississippi River Miles from Calcasieu River Miles from Vermilion River Width of chamber Width between abutments Length available for full width Lift Depth on sill at mean low gulf level Character of foundation � tj O H z d 0 z cTi C) June 1951 $4,700,948 (Flood Control MR&T Funds) October 1952 December 1950 $2,133,527 1934 February 1923 $1,775,132 $8,648,492 (non-Federal) 1935 1909' July 1961 $1,302,006 $13,902,222 1909 July 1961 19343 1. Closed permanently September 29, 1961. 2. Replacement of lock approved by the Secretary of Army, May 16, 1967; estimated Federal cost $25,900,000. 3. Transferred to project status. Construction of replacement lock, scheduled for January 1980. Opened to navigation Cost Completed April 1956 $5,215,700 September 1954 $2,754,000 (Flood Control MR&T Funds) 1933 $330,7652 I, - 1-- z 0 r a z r Id 'n' y U3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 11-E OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 1981 Full Report Operation Mo. and Yr. See Annual and Mo. and Yr. Project Deauthorized Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed Alteration of Berwick Bay Bridge' Amite River and Bayou Manchac, La. Baton Rouge Harbor, Segment between Mi. 2.5 and 5.02 Bayou Bonfouca, La. Bayou Dorcheat, Loggy Bayou and Lake Bisteneau, La.' 45 6 Bayou Dupre, La.7 Bayou Grosse Tete, La. 8 Bayou Lacombe, La. Bayou La Loutre, St. Malo, and Yscolskey, La. Bayou Plaquemine Brule, La. Bayou Queue de Tortue, La. Bayou Segnette Waterway, La. Bayou Terrebonne, La.4' 9 Bayou Vermilion, La.4 Big Pigeon and Little Pigeon Bayous, La.3 Calcasieu River at Coon Island, La.'o Cascasieu River Salt Water Barrier, La." Cane River, La.3 ' 6 Chefuncte River and Bogue Falia, La. Cypress Bayou and Waterway between Jefferson, Tex., and Shreveport, La.'2 Grand Bayou Pass, La. Inland Waterway from Franklin to Mermentau River, La."' 13 Intracoastal Waterway from the Mississippi River to Bayou Teche, La.'4 Lake Borgne and Chef Menteur- Bulkheads and Jetties Lake Charles Deep Water Channel, La.'5 Little Caillou Bayou, La. Mermentau River, Bayou Nezpique, and Bay Des Cannes, La. Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet, Michoud Canal, La. Navigation work under special authorization (Calcasieu Pass channel in Old River Bend at Cameron, La.)"7 Pass Manchac, La. Red River below Fulton, Ark.'8 "19. 2 0 Red River Waterway, La., Ark., Okla., and Tex. 19 ' 20 Red River Waterway, Shreveport, La. to Daingerfield, Tex. Sulphur River, Ark. and Tex.3, 6 Tickfaw, Natalbany, Ponchatoula, and Blood Rivers, La.4 - 197 - - - Nov. 1979 May 1981 Nov. 1979 1978 19462 1974 1887 1968 1969 1967 1970 1950 1970 1958 1961 1947 1936 1976 1973 1910 1967 1971 1950 1960 1956 19422 1950 1973 1977 1976 1957 1950 1978 1969 1976 1919 1973 28,234 30,997 5,000 38,915 1969 4,716 96,916 33,410 33,355 238,828 120,089 34,900 1,015,81410 4,197,262 2,500 58,342 202,817 7,676 249,052 77,761 5,197,97516 2,499,555 1,374 1,963,80618 70,000 45,989 8,115 69,087 290,192 104,1877 123,454 92,276 223,616 36,780 28,315 213,455 251,691 200,169 37,169 2,000 192,011 452,611 14,48012 552,780 11,699 241,896 751,485 114,519 1928 1931 1939 1938 May 1956 1915 March 1923 1916 1896 April 1974 Jan. 1968 1959 Dec. 1914 1939 1929 Nov. 1974 139,755 10,039 2,147,890 92,163 1912 1921 11-38 NEW ORLEANS, LA., DISTRICT TABLE 11-E OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (Continued) For Last Cost to Sep. 1981 Full Report Operation Mo. and Yr. See Annual and Mo. and Yr. Project Deauthorized Report For: Construction Maintenance Con.;leted Vinton Waterway, La.21 Nov. 1979 1950 - - Waterway from White Lake to Pecan Island, La.1 3 1948 10,904 10,742 1. Transferred to Department of Transportation. Authorized 13. Not completed; incorporated in navigation project "Merunder Truman-Hobbs Act. mentau River, La." 2. Date authorized. 14. Not completed; superseded for most of its length by present 3. Completed. Date will be furnished when available. 12- by 125-foot Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, which coincides with or 4. Includes previous project costs. parallels it. 5. No commerce reported. 15. Maintenance project; no future work schedules. 6. Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st 16. Includes $57,555 ($29,974 of which was from Public Works sess. funds) for new work on previous project. Includes $114,519 for 7. Includes $56 cost incurred in 1969. maintenance of previous project. 8. Completed except that portion above mile 10.3 providing for 17. Work is under continuing authority. widening from 40 feet to 60 feet, which is inactive. 18. Includes $1,553,878 for previous projects. 9. By Public Law 88-404, that portion of Bayou Terrebonne 19. Incorporated in the project "Red River Waterway-Mississippi between point where Barrow Street crosses said stream and a line River Shreveport, La." Sept. 30, 1976. determined by prolonging and extending eastern right-of-way line of 20. Emergency bank protection on this project is reported New Orleans Boulevard southerly to south bank of said stream was separately as "Red River Emergency Bank Protection." Two reaches, declared nonnavigable. "Red River Waterway-Mississippi River to Shreveport, La." and "Red 10. Includes $66,000 contributed funds. River Waterway-Shreveport, La., Daingerfield, Tex.," are also 11. Operation and maintenance of the structure reported under reported separately. project "Calcasieu River and Pass, La." 21. No work performed; local interests have not provided rights- 12. Excludes $50,000 contributed funds. of-way and dumping privileges. TABLE 11-F RESERVOIR OPERATIONS FISCAL YEAR 1981 See Section Storage in Text Project (acre feet) Inflow' Outflow' 29. Bayou Bodcau Oct. 1, 1980 329 - Reservoir, La. Sep. 30, 1981 253 - Jun. 17, 1981 (Max) 34,434 May. 24, 1981 (Max) - 3,420 - Jun. 17, 1981 (Max) - 1,740 41. Wallace Lake, La. Oct. 1, 19802 Sep. 30, 1981 7,676 Jun. 8, 1981 (Max) 38,334 Jun. 7, 1981 (Max) - 8,897 - Jun. 8, 1981(Max) - 2,082 1. Cubic feet per second. 2. No record from Oct. 1 to Oct. 26, 1980, Water surface below limits of automatic and staff gages. 11-39 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 11-G RED RIVER BELOW DENISON DAM (NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT): NEW PROJECTS (See Sec. 38 of Text) Drainage Conserva- Flood Area tion Control Estimated (square Storage (acre- Federal Project Stream miles) (acre-feet) feet) Cost Bayou Bodcau and tributaries, Ark." 2 - 1,158 - - $ 20,400,0003 Bayou Nicholas-Coushatta, La. 70,7174 Bayou Pierre in vicinity of Shreveport, La." - - 243,3363 Caddo Lake, La.' Caddo Lake - - - 3,587,8002 Campti-Clarence Area in Natchitoches Parish, La. Red River - - - 1,950,0003 Garland City, Ark."6 - - - - 1,336,0003 Maniece Bayou, Ark. -- 970,0323 McKinney Bayou, Ark. 7 8 - - - - 5,700,0003 Posten Bayou, Ark. and La. 2' 6'9 - - - 560,000 Red River below Denison Dam levees and bank stabilization, Tex., Ark., and La. (New Orleans District)" 3 - 52,600,0003 Total 87,417,885 1. Details presented in individual report herein. 2. Construction on this project not started. 3. In addition, non-Federal funds are: Bayou Bodcau and tributaries, Ark. and La. .......................................................................... $4,100,000 Bayou Pierre in vicinity of Shreveport, La. (cash contribution) ........................................................ 89,047 Caddo Lake, La. ...................... ........................................................28.,.0.00......... Campti-Clarence Area in Natchitoches Parish, La. ......................................... 480,000 East Point ....................................................... ......... ................................. 67,000 Garland City, A rk ............................................................................................... 6,000 Maniece Bayou, Ark. (cash contribution) ................................................................................ 39,293 McKinney Bayou, Ark. (cash contribution) .......................................................................... 500,000 Red River below Denison Dam, levees and bank stabilization, Tex., Ark., and La. .................................... 1,270,000 4. For last full report, see Annual Report for 1964. 5. For last full report, see Annual Report for 1951. 6. Inactive. 7. Includes $4,330,200, Code 711, and $399,739 accelerated Public Work funds. 8. Joint-use pool (sediment). 9. Deauthorized by resolution Dec. 17, 1970, which also authorized new project "Posten Bayou, Ark.," under provision of Sec. 201 of Flood Control Act of 1965. 11-40 NEW ORLEANS, LA., DISTRICT TABLE 11-H RED RIVER BELOW DENISON DAM (NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT): INCORPORATED PROJECTS (See Sec. 38 of Text) For Last Flood Federal Full Report Control Federal See Annual Project Type of Work Act Cost Report For Aloha-Rigolette Area, Grant and Rapides Parishes, La. Levee and appurtenances 1941 $ 1,653,237' 1956 Bayou Bodcau Reservoir, La. Flood-control reservoir 1938 5,120,7401 2 Bayou Bodcau, Red Chute, and Loggy Bayou, La. Channel improvement 1941 319,2001 1948 Bayou Pierre, La. Channel enlargement 1936 299,5291 3 Black Bayou Lake, La.4'5 Flood-control reservoir 1936 714,000 1945 Colfax, Grant Parish, La. Cutoff 1938 70,3481, 6 1938 Grant Parish, below Colfax, La. Levees 1938 38,809' 1941 Hempstead County levee district No. 1, Ark. Levee enlargement 1938 88,0061 1941 Natchitoches Parish, La. Levee and appurtenances 1936 1,529,9271 7 1956 Pineville, Red River, La. Levee and appurtenances 1941 232,426' 1953 Red River in vicinity of Shreveport, La. Bank protection 1944 3,908,000' 1953 Red River Parish, La. Levee enlargement 1936 149,4351 1939 Saline Point, La. Cutoff 1936 124,111' 1945 Wallace Lake, La. Flood-control reservoir 1936 1,219,371" 2 Total $15,467,134 1. Actual cost. 5. Inactive. 2. Includes amounts indicated for recreational facilities under 6. Completed under provisions of Sec. 7 of Flood Control Act of Code 711, Bayou Bodcau Reservoir, La., $1,027,000; Wallace Lake, La., 1928, as amended by Sec. 9 of Flood Control Actof 1936, and included in $17,164. 1939 Annual Report of President, Mississippi River Commission, 3. Included in this report. p. 2214. 4. Work not started. 7. In addition, $250,000 was expended from contributed funds. 11-41 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 11-I OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD DAMAGE PREVENTION PROJECTS (See Sec. 44 of Text) For Last Cost to Sep. 1981 Full Report Operation Mo. and Yr. See Annual and Mo. and Yr. Project Deauthorized Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed Aloha-Rigolette Area, Grant and Rapides Parishes, La.' - 1956 $ 1,653,189 $ - Apr. 1955 Amite River and Tributaries, La. - 1964 3,034,2552 - Feb. 1964 Bayou Bodcau, Red Chute, and Loggy Bayou, La.' - 1948 319,200 - Jan. 1948 Bayou Choupique, La.3 - 1954 129,930 - Mar. 1954 Bayou Nicholas, Coushatta, La.3 - 1964 70,717 - Jun. 1964 Bayou Pierre in vicinity of Shreveport, La."' 2 - 1951 243,3362 - Jun. 1939 Bayou Rapides, La. 3 - 1952 95,179 Dec. 1951 Black Bayou Reservoir, La." 4, 5 - 1945 - - Black Bayou-Pine Island Area, La.3 - 1963 336,063 - May 1963 Campti-Clarence Area in Natchitoches Parish, La. - 1978 1,655,700 - Jul. 1978 Choctaw Bayou and Tributaries, La." 7 - 1977 741,892 Apr. 1976 Colfax, Grant Parishes, La." ' - 1938 70,348 Cooper Lake and Channels, Tex.8 - 1979 20,839,300 - - East Point, La. - 1969 486,069 - Aug. 1968 Ferrells Bridge Dam-Lake 0' the Pines, Tex.9 - 1979 14,175,197 8,301,021 Garland City, Ark. - 1976 1,335,842 - Jul. 1974 Grant Parish below Colfax, La." 9 - 1941 38,809 9 Harvey Canal, Bayou Barataria Levee, La. - 1979 1,000,003 - - Hempstead County Levee District No. 1, Ark." 9 - 1941 88,006 - 9 Maniece Bayou, Ark.' 2 - 1970 970,9322 - Aug. 1969 McKinney Bayou, Finn Bayou Segment, Ark.'o Aug. 1977 196310 Morgan City and vicinity, La. - 1976 752,9352 - - Natchitoches Parish, La."' 2 - 1956 1,529,478 - Aug. 1955 Pineville, Red River, La." 3 - 1953 232,426 - Dec. 1951 Posten Bayou, Ark." - 1973 Red River Parish, La." ' - 1939 149,435 Red River in vicinity of Shreveport, La.' - 1953 3,908,000 - Mar. 1953 Saline Point, La." 9 - 1945 124,111 - Twelvemile Bayou, La.3 - 1966 335,433 - May 1965 Wright Patman Dam and Lake, Tex.s - 1979 35,659,176 11,195,021 1. Authorized under project "Red River Below Denison Dam." 4. Construction not initiated. 2. In addition, the following was expended from contributed 5. Inactive. funds: 6. Includes $92,000 for preauthorization studies. Amite River and tributaries .................. $ 430 7. Completed under provisions of Sec. 7, Flood Control Act 1928, Bayou Pierre in vicinity of as amended by Sec. 9, Flood Control Act 1936, and included in 1939 Shreveport, La........................... 89,047 Annual Report of President, Mississippi River Commission, p. 2214. Choctaw Bayou and Tributaries, La. .......... 170,799 8. These projects transferred to the Fort Worth District, South- Harvey Canal, Bayou Barataria western Division, during Fiscal Year 1979. Levee, La ................................... 425,209 9. Completed. Date will be furnished when available. Maniece Bayou, Ark. ....................... 39,293 10. Date authorized. Natchitoches Parish, La. .................... 250,000 11. Posten Bayou Project, authorized by Senate and House 3. Authorized by Chief of Engineers. (Sec. 205, 1948 Flood Resolutions, Dec. 17 and 15, 1970, deleted the plan authorized by the Control Act, as amended.) Flood Control Act dated Aug. 3, 1955. 11-42 NEW ORLEANS, LA., DISTRICT TABLE 11-J ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (96x3121) Federal Cost Totals by Item and CWIS Number FY 81 Categories SURVEYS (Category 100) Navigation (110) Barataria Bay Waterway-Dupre Cut Section, La. -10002 $ 145 Barataria Bay W. Entrance Channel, La. -10017' 0 Bayou Manchac & Amite River, La. -800062 0 GIWW Louisiana Section, High Level Highway Crossings -79030' 0 GIWW La. & Tex. Section -10032 306,492 Miss. River-Gulf Outlet, La. -55270 33,005 339,642 Flood Damage Prevention Studies (120) Aloha-Rigolette Area, La. -12123 168,230 Louisiana Coastal Area, La. -61610 201,350 Mermentau, Vermilion & Calcasieu Rivers & Bayou Teche, La. -34014 123,661 New Orleans, Baton Rouge Metro Area, La. -12035 80,669 West Bank of Miss. River in vicinity of New Orleans, La. -59360 0 573,910 Comprehensive Basin Studies (150) Red River Authorization Report -81129 39,021 Coordination Studies with Other Agencies (180) Water Quality Management (184) -51860 3,520 Coastal Zone Management (185) -51880 2,532 Planning Assistance to States (186) -51850 7,015 Tech. & Engr. Assist. Shore & Streambank Erosion (188) -51731 1,184 14,251 TOTAL (Category 100) $ 966,824 Collection and Study of Basic Data (Category 200) Inspection and Inventory of Dams (236) -53843 and -53842 -215 Flood Plain Management Services (250) Flood Plain Management Services 168,551 Hydrologic Studies (260) Hydrologic Studies -53820 3,847 TOTAL (Category 200) $172,183 Research and Development (Category 300) 0 None GRAND TOTAL GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS $1,139,007 1. Study terminated and classified "Inactive" Jan. 30, 1981. 2. Unfavorable report went to Congress Mar. 24, 1981. 3. Report went to Congress May 1, 1981. 11-43 1981 VICKSBURG, MISS., DISTRICT* This district comprises western Mississippi, southern Arkansas, northeastern Louisiana, and a very small portion of southwestern Tennessee, embraced in drainage basins of eastern tributaries of Mississippi River south of Horn Lake Creek to and including Buffalo River; western tributaries between White and Red Rivers, including Arkansas River Basin below a point 3 miles upstream from Pine Bluff and Arkansas River below mile 36.1 near Pendleton, Ark.; and Ouachita and Black Rivers in Arkansas and Louisiana. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Lake Providence Harbor, La. .................. Madison Parish Port, La ...................... Ouachita and Black Rivers below Camden, Ark. .............................. Rosedale Harbor, Miss. ....................... Yazoo River, Miss ............................ Other authorized navigation projects .......... Navigation work under special authorization .............................. Page 12-1 12-2 12-2 12-3 12-3 12-3 12-3 Flood Damage Prevention Ouachita River and Tributaries, Ark. and La................... ............. 12-3 Blakely Mountain Dam-Lake Ouachita, Ouachita River, Ark .............. 12-4 DeGray Lake, Caddo River, Ark............... 12-4 8C. 8D. 8E. 8F. 9. 10. 11. Flood Damage Prevention (cont) Narrows Dam-Lake Greeson, Little Missouri River, Ark.......................... Bayou Bartholomew and Tributaries, Ark. and La. ..................... Monroe Floodwall, La.......................... Ouachita River Levees, La .................. Inspection of completed Flood Damage Prevention projects ................... Other authorized Flood Damage Prevention projects ........... ........... Flood Damage Prevention work under special authorization .................... Page 12-4 12-4 12-5 12-5 12-5 12-5 12-5 General Investigations 12. Surveys ...................................... 12-5 13. Collection and study of basic data ............ 12-5 Navigation 1. LAKE PROVIDENCE HARBOR, LA. Location. In Hagaman Chute, a secondary channel of the Mississippi River at mile 483.4 above Head of Passes, and about 3 miles south of Lake Providence, La. Existing project. A dredged harbor channel about 0.7 mile long and 150 feet wide with a project depth of 9 feet in Hagaman Chute from the Mississippi River. Channel was widened to 400 feet in front of and upstream from port area, a distance of 800 feet, to provide a turning basin. Local interests constructed retaining dikes to provide the disposal area for material excavated from channel and turning basin. Resulting hydraulic fill provides a raised port area. Federal cost of completed work was $198,859, excluding preauthorization study costs of $9,678. Total non-Federal cost was $233,400, including cost of retaining dikes, and a cash contribution of $35,000. In addition, local interests have spent $1,022,000 for port facilities. Restudy of port for expansion, completed under continuing authority program. No further expansion is recommended. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Local interests provided port facilities, Operations and results during fiscal year. Leased dredge Lewis James dredged 156,500 cubic yards of material for maintenance in harbor channel and turning basin in January 1981. Local interests have provided a diked disposal area for maintenance dredging in the harbor. *All cost and financial statements and authorizing legislation for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 12-1 8. 8A. 8B. REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 Condition as of Sep. 30. No problems were experienced with navigation during the fiscal year. The leased dredge Lewis James worked in the harbor and connecting channel during January 1981. Part of the dredged material from the maintenance operation was deposited in the diked disposal area furnished by the Lake Providence Port Commission. 2. MADISON PARISH PORT, LA. Location. A "fast-water" dredged channel located near the right descending bank of the Mississippi River at mile 457.2 above Head of Passes, and about 6 miles north of Tallulah, Louisiana. Existing project. A dredged harbor channel about 0.5 mile long and 150 feet wide with a project depth of 9 feet. A turning basin within this channel was constructed by widening the harbor channel to 350 feet for a distance of 1,000 feet. Dredged material was used in construction of two hydraulic fills on property owned by the Madison Parish Port Commission for future development. Channel construction was completed in October 1980. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Madison Parish Port Commission has constructed a multi-purpose loading dock, rail facilities, and storage building on hydraulic fill. Two private interests are engaged in grain handling facilities on adjacent properties. Operations and results during fiscal year. Leased dredge Lewis James completed final cleanup of slopes in turning basin in October 1980 in conjunction with routine maintenance. A total of 229,085 cubic yards was removed in October and December 1980. Condition as of September 30. No major navigation problems exist at the present time. 3. OUACHITA AND BLACK RIVERS BELOW CAMDEN, ARK. Location. Ouachita River rises in Polk County, Ark., and flows southeasterly and southerly about 600 miles. Below its confluence with the Tensas and Little Rivers at Jonesville, La., it is called Black River, which enters Red River 35.5 miles from the Mississippi River. Previous projects. See page 683 of Annual Report for 1962 for details. Existing project. See page 684 of Annual Report for 1962 for details of existing 6.5-foot navigation project. New work for completed project costs $4,574,551, exclusive of amounts expended under previous projects. Modified project and project for Red River below Fulton, Ark., provide for a channel 9 feet deep and 100 feet wide in Red River between Old River and mouth of Black River, and in Black and Ouachita Rivers from mouth of Black River to Camden, Ark. This is being accomplished by construction of four new locks, 84 feet by 600 feet; new dams; channel realinement; and measures to preserve Catahoula Lake for migratory waterfowl. Jonesville Lock and Dam replaced existing Lock and Dam No. 2; Columbia Lock and Dam replaced existing Lock and Dams Nos. 3, 4, and 5; Felsenthal Lock and Dam will replace existing Lock and Dam No. 6; and Calion Lock and Dam will replace existing Lock and Dam No. 8. The Felsenthal Canal was deauthorized as of Aug. 5, 1977, in accordance with Section 12 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1974. The River and Harbor Act of 1970 authorized establishment of wildlife refuges along Bayou D'Arbonne (14,700 acres) in connection with Columbia Lock and Dam and at Felsenthal Lock and Dam (65,000 acres). The Bayou D'Arbonne refuge was increased to 18,000 acres at the request of the Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife. Approved (1981) estimated cost for new work for 9-foot navigation project is $246,751,000 including $238,000,000 Federal and $8,751,000 non-Federal for lands, damages, and relocations. Local cooperation. Local cooperation for all completed work in Louisiana has been furnished in a timely manner. It is anticipated that local interests in Louisiana will be able to supply the necessary rights-of-way for construction of the cutoffs and bend widenings. Local interests in Arkansas have furnished the rights-of-way for the Felsenthal and Calion Locks and Dams and it is anticipated that the remaining rights-of-way will be furnished when needed. The city of Camden, Ark., has furnished land for the Sandy Beach recreation area. All assurances from local interests in Arkansas including supplemental assurances (Public Law 91- 646) have been accepted. The State of Louisiana has not furnished supplemental assurances; however, they are anticipated in the near future. Terminal facilities. Public loading docks are at Columbia, La., and Camden, Ark. Privately owned docks and loading and unloading facilities are at Columbia, Monroe, and Sterlington, La., and El Dorado, Calion, and Camden, Ark. Two grainhandling facilities and a petroleum-loading facility are in the vicinity of Jonesville, La., and a grain-handling facility is in the vicinity of Acme, La. Operations and results during fiscal year. Construction of Felsenthal and Calion Locks and Dams is scheduled for completion in FY 82. Design of the Felsenthal cutoff and closure dam are completed in anticipation of beginning construction in early FY 82. A channel alinement review was conducted in response to public opposition to the channel realinement features of the project. Several alternative tow configurations were evaluated in the review, and the results were presented in public meetings held in August and September 1981. The leased dredge Butcher removed 838,858 cubic yards of material from the Ouachita-Black waterway between July-September 1981. Condition as of Sep. 30. The 6.5-foot project is complete and is being maintained. Planning and design for the 9-foot navigation project started in Fiscal Year 1962 are continuing. Construction at Columbia Lock and Dam started in February 1964. The dam was completed in November 1968, and the lock was completed in January 1970 and was placed in service in May 1972. Construction at Jonesville Lock and Dam started in May 1967. The lock and dam were completed in January 1972 and were placed in service in March 1972. A 9-foot navigation channel to Lock and Dam No. 5 at Sterlington, La., was established in June 1972. (See Table 12-C on locks and dams, Ouachita and Black Rivers, Ark. and La.) The contract for removal of four abandoned locks and dams which proved hazardous to navigation in the Columbia and Jonesville pools is completed. Construction of Felsenthal Lock and Dam is nearing completion and construction of Calion Lock and Dam is continuing. There have been 17,380 acres acquired for the Bayou D'Arbonne Wildlife Refuge and 64,394 acres acquired for the Felsenthal Wildlife Refuge. Acquisition of the remaining lands for both refuges is continuing. 12-2 VICKSBURG, MISS., DISTRICT Extension of navigation to Arkadelphia is being evaluated as an interim study of the on going comprehensive Ouachita River Basin study. 4. ROSEDALE HARBOR, MISS. Location. In Log Loader Chute, a secondary channel of the Mississippi River at mile 584.5 above Head of Passes, and about 2 miles south of Rosedale, Mississippi. Existing project. A dredged harbor channel about 2.4 miles long and 150 feet wide with a project depth of 9 feet. A turning basin consists of a dredged channel 1,000 feet long and 400 feet wide. Local interests constructed retaining dikes to provide the disposal area for material excavated from the channel and turning basin. Resulting hydraulic fill provides a 20 acre port area. Channel construction was completed in February 1978 at a cost of $2 million. Local interests are continuing construction on port terminal, dock facilities, and additional dredging. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Local interests provided port facilities. Operations and results during fiscal year. Leased dredge Lewis James removed 283,152 cubic yards of material during November 1980 and January-February 1981. Condition as of September 30. No major problems were experienced with navigation after entrance channel was dredged in January 1981. 5. YAZOO RIVER, MISS. Location. Formed by junction of Tallahatchie and Yalobusha Rivers in Leflore County, Miss., flows about 169 miles southerly and southwesterly, and enters Mississippi River at Vicksburg, Miss. (See Mississippi River alluvial valley quadrangle maps.) Previous projects. See page 681 of Annual Report for 1961 for details. Authorized project. The Yazoo River Navigation project consists of a 9-foot channel from its mouth to Greenwood, Miss., mile 164.9 (present mileage), with a minimum width of 150 feet. The project includes a single lock (84 feet by 600 feet) and a dam located near Vicksburg, dredging and channel realinement; 600,000 acre-feet of additional storage in Sardis Lake to augment low flows in the Yazoo River, and recreation features. Total estimated (1981) Federal cost of 9-foot project is $198,373,000 which includes $373,000 for the U.S. Coast Guard. Total estimated non-Federal cost is $2,533,000. These figures do not include the total estimated (1981) Federal cost of Belzoni Bridge relocation which is $8,570,000 and the total estimated non-Federal cost which is $252,000. Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation are fully described on page 12-3 of Fiscal Year 80 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. At Greenwood there is a privatelyowned dock and a grain-loading facility. There are privatelyowned facilities for loading grain at Belzoni and Satartia. At Yazoo City there is a privately-owned grain-loading facility, a private log-loading facility, a private dock to handle dry and liquid fertilizer, and a public terminal. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preliminary engineering work was completed and a contract was awarded to the Mississippi State Highway Department for design and construction of the Belzoni Bridge relocation. Maintenance clearing and snagging was performed. Phase I AE&D studies of authorized project and other alternative plans are being conducted. Condition as of Sep. 30. Entire river is navigable. No work done on new authorization, except for construction work connected with the relocation of State Highway No. 12 Bridge at Belzoni, Miss. Phase I studies are continuing on the 9-foot project. 6. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS See Table 12-D. 7. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Sec. 107, Public Law 87- 645, as amended (preauthorization). A reconnaissance report, recommending that no further studies be undertaken for Lake Providence, was completed at a cost of $5,000. Detailed studies were initiated for Port Gibson Port, Miss., in January 1979. A public meeting was held in December 1980 with the Final Report submitted in September 1981. A final post authorization change report on Crossett Harbor, Ark., was submitted to LMVD in May 1980. The project was approved for construction by the Division Engineer and preparation of plans and specifications is now under way. Flood Damage Prevention 8. OUACHITA RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, ARK. AND LA. Location. Improvements comprising comprehensive projects are on main stem Ouachita River, Ark. and La., on its tributaries, Caddo and Little Missouri Rivers, and in Pine Bluff, Ark. Description of Ouachita River Basin is presented in greater detail on page 690 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. The authorized general plan for flood control and other purposes in the Ouachita River Basin includes the projects listed in Table 12-E. The 1966 Flood Control Act modified the Bayou Bartholomew and Tributaries, Ark. and La., project to include ten water-retention lakes in the western tributaries of Bayou Bartholomew in Arkansas and six local levee units along the main stem of the bayou in Louisiana. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed features of comprehensive project. (See individual statements for further details.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Operations for Blakely Mt. Dam-Lake Ouachita, DeGray Lake, Narrows Dam-Lake Greeson, Bayou Bartholomew and Tributaries, Monroe Floodwall, and Ouachita River Levees are shown in individual reports herein. Condition as of Sep. 30. Pertinent data on those features which are complete or not started are in Table 12-E. 12-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 Conditions of Blakely Mt. Dam-Lake Ouachita, DeGray Lake, and Narrows Dam-Lake Greeson are given in the following individual reports. An overall basin study including interim studies of the Monroe-West Monroe area, the Ouachita River Levees, the Arkansas Lakes, and extension of navigation to Arkadelphia is ongoing. 8A. BLAKELY MOUNTAIN DAM-LAKE OUACHITA, OUACHITA RIVER, ARK. Location. This project is on Ouachita River, Ark., at head of Lake Hamilton (pool of Carpenter Dam), 486 miles above mouth of Black River, and approximately 10 miles northwest of Hot Springs, Ark. Previous project. See page 693 of Annual Report for 1962 for details. Existing project. A lake-of 2,768,500 acre-feet storage capacity for flood control and other purposes with an installed power capacity of 75,000 kilowatts. Remaining work consists of completion of public-use facilities. Latest approved (1981) estimated project cost is $44,300,000. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results duringfiscal year. Power production totaled 134,971,000 kilowatt-hours of which 133,512,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Arkansas Power and Light Co., under contract between that company and Southwestern Power Administration. The maximum pool elevation of 581.2 feet above NGVD, or 3.2 feet above the maximum power pool, occurred on June 8, 1981. Storage in the power pool at this time amounted to 132,413 acre-feet. Peak 24-hour inflow of 19,464 cubic feet per second occurred on June 5, 1981. On Sep. 30, 1981, the pool elevation was 576.1 feet above NGVD and storage in the power pool was 1,211,884 acre-feet. Condition as of Sep. 30. Project was started in August 1947 and was completed for beneficial use in October 1955, except for public-use facilities. Generation of power and operation and maintenance activities are continuing. Remote control equipment has been installed to operate the power plants at DeGray Lake and Narrows Dam-Lake Greeson. 8B. DEGRAY LAKE, CADDO RIVER, ARK. Location. On Caddo River (mile 8), a tributary of Ouachita River, in a narrow, rocky gorge in Clark and Hot Springs Counties, approximately 7 miles north of Arkadelphia, Ark. Existing project. Provides for a lake of 881,900 acre-feet storage capacity for flood control, water supply, pollution abatement, and power with an installed power capacity of 68,000 kilowatts (one conventional 40,000-kilowatt generating unit and one 28,000-kilowatt generating unit with reversible pump-type turbine). Latest approved (1980) estimated first cost is $72,034,000, including $5,800,000 for water supply, to be reimbursed by local interests, exclusive of interest. Local cooperation. None required for flood control and power features. Fully complied with for water supply feature. Operations and results during fiscal year. Power production totaled 74,582,000 kilowatt-hours, of which 73,132,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Arkansas Power and Light Co., under contract between that company and Southwestern Power Administration. The maximum pool elevation of 412.7 feet above NGVD, or 4.7 feet above the maximum power pool, occurred on June 8, 1981. Storage in the flood control pool at this time amounted to 66,112 acre-feet. Peak 24-hour inflow of 16,639 cubic feet per second occurred on June 5, 1981. On Sep. 30, 1981, the pool elevation was 405.2 feet above NGVD and storage in the power pool was 356,076 acre-feet. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction started in June 1962 and was essentially complete in December 1971. All major construction is complete including the remote control for the power plant from Blakely Mt. Dam-Lake Ouachita. Generation of power, operation, and maintenance is continuing. 8C. NARROWS DAM-LAKE GREESON, LITTLE MISSOURI RIVER, ARK. Location. Narrows Dam is on the Little Missouri River, Ark., 105 miles above the mouth and 5 miles northwest of Murfreesboro, Ark. Existing project. Provides a lake of 407,900 acre-feet storage capacity for flood control and other purposes with power installation of 25,500 kilowatts in three units of 8,500 kilowatts each. Remaining work consists of completion of public-use facilities. Latest approved (1981) estimated cost is $20,600,000, excluding $1,738,700 for third generating unit and remote control equipment. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Power production totaled 41,079,100 kilowatt-hours, of which 40,469,430 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Texas-Louisiana Electric Cooperative, Inc., under contract between that company and Southwestern Power Administration. The maximum pool elevation of 555.8 feet above NGVD, or 7.8 feet above the maximum power pool, occurred on June 8, 1981. Storage in the flood control pool at this time amounted to 61,286 acre-feet. Peak 24-hour inflow of 14,176 cubic feet per second occurred on June 3, 1981. On Sep. 30, 1981, the pool elevation was 540.2 feet above NGVD and storage in the power pool was 149,000 acre-feet. Condition as of Sep. 30. Project was started in May 1947 and was completed for beneficial use in May 1950. The third power generating unit was completed in January 1970. Installation of remote control equipment was completed in June 1972. Generation of power, operation, and maintenance is continuing. Remote control equipment has been installed for operation of the power plant from Blakely Mt. Dam-Lake Ouachita. 8D. BAYOU BARTHOLOMEW AND TRIBUTARIES, ARK. AND LA. Location. Bayou Bartholomew rises in Jefferson County, Ark., about 10 miles northwest of Pine Bluff and flows southerly about 370 miles to join the Ouachita River upstream from Sterlington, La. Authorized project. Project includes ten water-retention lakes in the western tributaries of Bayou Bartholomew in Arkansas and six local levee units along the main stem of Bayou Bartholomew in Louisiana. However, because of public opposition to construction of the loop levees, preconstruction planning of the six loop levees has been deferred until such time as there is sufficient support for such levees by local interests. Channel improvements previously authorized are deferred until it is determined that the quality and quantity of water downstream will not be adversely affected. Latest 12-4 VICKSBURG, MISS., DISTRICT approved (1979) estimated cost of new work is $46,913,000 including $44,800,000 Federal and $2,113,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation are fully described on page 12-5 of Fiscal Year 80 Annual Report. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning and design have been deferred pending favorable benefit-cost ratios. Condition as of Sep. 30. Preparation of general design memorandum has been deferred due to lack of economic justification. 8E. MONROE FLOODWALL, LA. Location. Monroe, La., lies within the alluvial valley of the Mississippi River and on the east bank of the Ouachita River. The city is located in the north-central part of Louisiana, in Ouachita Parish. Existing project. Provides for construction of floodwall to close the 1,750-foot opening extending from Bry Avenue to Grammont Street. Floodwall will provide complete flood protection to the city of Monroe. Total Federal cost of new work was $2,561,000. Non-Federal cost was $206,000. Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation are fully described on page 12-6 of Fiscal Year 80 Annual Report. Condition as of Sep. 30. Work on the floodwall is complete. 8F. OUACHITA RIVER LEVEES, LA. Location. East bank of Ouachita River between Bastrop, La., and Sandy Bayou. Loop levees on the west bank at West Monroe, Columbia, and Bawcomville. Existing project. There are 105.9 miles of levee on the east bank and 11.6 miles of levee in the three loops on the west bank. A letter report, approved by the Chief of Engineers, authorized gravel surfacing 37.8 miles of levee, enlargement of 40.4 miles of levee, and a 5.7-mile southward extension of the east bank levee. Approved (1979) estimated Federal cost is $9,400,000. Estimated non-Federal cost is $25,000. Local cooperation. Requirements and assurances of local cooperation are fully described on page 12-6 of Fiscal Year 80 Annual Report. Condition as of Sep. 30. Completion of the authorized work would not correct all project deficiencies. Enlargement of the Bawcomville levee, enlargement of the east bank levee above Monroe, and replacement of numerous drainage structures are not authorized. Therefore the construction of the present Ouachita River levee project has been deferred. A complete stutdy of the Ouachita River levee system is being accomplished as an interim study of the ongoing comprehensive Ouachita River Basin study. Item I of the Monroe to Sandy Bayou Levee enlargement project was completed Jul. 7, 1978; additional work is being deferred. Restorations are in progress on West Monroe Floodgate monoliths 101-105 (222.5 feet) which were damaged by fire at Union Oil Mill, scheduled for completion Jan. 1, 1981. 9. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD DAMAGE PREVENTION PROJECTS Inspection of completed work was accomplished at a cost of $42,723 for the fiscal year. Total cost as of Sep. 30, 1981, is $957,357. 10. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD DAMAGE PREVENTION PROJECTS See Table 12-F. 11. FLOOD DAMAGE PREVENTION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency flood control activities-repair,fl ood fighting, and rescue work. (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation.) Emergency repairs to local interest levees along Abiaca, Ascalmore, and Tillatoba Creeks were accomplished in early FY 81. Snagging and clearing of navigable streams and tributaries in the interest of flood control (Sec. 208 of 1954 Flood Control Act, Public Law 780, 83d Cong.). No activity during the period. Emergency bank protection (Sec. 14 of 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Cong.). The Conference Report on the Fiscal Year 1981 Energy and Water Development appropriations contain authority for the Corps to correct bank stability problems for a Coahoma County road at mile 175.8 on the Big Sunflower River. This work is scheduled for early FY 82. A project to stabilize the banks of the Homochitto River to protect the U.S. Highway 98 bridge was approved in June 1975. Construction was completed in January 1978. Flood control activities pursuant to Sec. 205, Public Law 858, 80th Cong., as amended (preauthorization). A final detailed project report on Lead Bayou, Bolivar and Sunflower Counties, Miss., was submitted in January 1980 and approved in June 1980. Plans and Specifications were completed during Fiscal Year 1981. No funds have been made available to initiate construction. Total expenditure, as of Sep. 30, 1981, was $232,000. Detailed studies of Woodruff Creek, Ark., have been terminated as of Feb. 13, 1981. Total cost of Sep. 30, 1981, was $160,000. Detailed studies of Salt Creek, Ark., have been terminated as of Apr. 21, 1981. Total cost as of Sep. 30, 1981, was $124,000. Detailed studies on Willow Depot Creek, Ark., have been terminated as of Sep. 11, 1981. Total cost as of Sep. 30, 1981, was $143,000. Detailed studies were initiated on Dowling Bayou, Miss., in January, 1980. Fieldwork was 95 percent complete as of September, 1981. Total cost as of Sep. 30, 1981, was $145,000. Detailed studies of Whiting Bayou, Miss., indicate a lack of justification for any alternative consideration. Project termination will be recommended. Total cost as of Sep. 30, 1981, was $140,000. General Investigations 12. SURVEYS See Table 12-G. 13. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA See Table 12-G. 12-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 12-A See Section in Text 1. COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Project Lake Providence Harbor, La. 2. Madison Parish Port, La. 3. Ouachita and Black Rivers below Camden, Ark. (6.5-foot navigation project) Ouachita and Black Rivers below Camden, Ark. (9-foot navigation project) 4. Rosedale Harbor, Miss. 5. Yazoo River, Miss. 8A. Blakely Mt. Dam- Lake Ouachita, Ouachita River, Ark. Code 713 Funds 8B. DeGray Lake Caddo River, Ark. 8C. Narrows Dam-Lake Greeson, Little Missouri River, Ark. Code 713 Funds FY 78 87,800 87,867 45,000 35,599 FY 79 225,000 224,985 115,000 105,752 Funding FY 80 New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost - 163,600 65,190 520,000 478,276 250,000 17,900 19,900,000 17,157,320 3,494,400 3,110,838 90,200 90,427 164,000 317,050 54,500 52,996 0 186,919 3,983,000 3,231,158 0 7,920 835,000 1,164,447 2,506,400 2,470,062 0 76,029 1,941,300 1,813,572 0 77,783 12-6 FY 81 $ - 268,800 154,377 -24,000 36,372 250,000 208,977 19,200,000 21,665,779 3,362,700 3,217,854 296,900 164,589 2,760,000 3,073,265 34,000 32,967 145,000 49,017 2,828,000 3,806,951 1,725 25,256 0 87,524 2,210,000 2,316,783 145,000 32,741 2,128,000 2,145,519 -1,725 0 10,710,000 7,465,608 3,521,700 3,443,295 1,812,000 1,815,016 500,000 163,303 38,500 38,500 455,000 52,249 2,293,800 2,208,110 9,400 106,353 2,735,000 2,173,260 1,848,000 1,797,665 235,000 63,067 1,322,400 1,276,437 -1,800 21,315 14,400,000 18,588,719 4,065,581 3,972,063 400,000 399,773 590,000 580,667 50,000 50,000 254,000 420,474 2,715,300 2,276,653 7,500 13,318 1,624,000 2,212,130 2,656,600 2,470,718 234,000 325,107 2,357,100 2,170,495 12,500 62,200 Total Funds to Sep. 30, 1981 $ 208,5371 208,5371 1,571,500 1,358,652 656,000 655,999 500,000 226,877 5,248,6191 5,248,6192 155,207,000 154,336,822 49,233,407 48,504,118 2,000,000 2,000,000 787,100 654,789 4,773,6613 44,655,6763 1,096,315 1,093,778 33,174,944 33,027,509 27,723,092 27,373,472 473,625 472,248 72,033,992 71,964,426 15,218,683 15,014,572 15,908,229 15,789,658 20,563,737 20,186,223 331,975 304,180 VICKSBURG, MISS., DISTRICT TABLE 12-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) See Section Total Funds to in Text Project Funding FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 Sep. 30, 1981 8D. Bayou Bartholomew New Work and Tributaries Approp. - - - - 974,000 Ark. and La. Cost - - - - 974,000 8E. Monroe Floodwall, New Work La. Approp. -110,000 - - - 2,560,500 Cost 6,464 1,189 10,272 - 2,560,500 8F. Ouachita River New Work Levees, La. Approp. 0 10,000 - - 2,634,000 Cost 119,767 26,287 999 - 2,634,000 1. Actual costs include $198,859 Public Works Acceleration Act funds and $9,678 expended for planning and design; excludes $35,000 contributed funds, $198,400 cost of retaining dikes, and $1,022,000 local interests' costs for port facilities. 2. Includes $674,068 for new work on previous projects. 3. Includes $359,661 for previous projects. Present appropriations include funds for Advance Participation on Belzoni Bridge. 12-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 12-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Jul. 14, 1960, as amended Jul. 14, 1960, as amended May 17, 1950 Jul. 14, 1960 Dec. 31, 1970 Jul. 14, 1960, as amended Mar. 3, 1875 Aug. 13, 1968 May 17, 1950 LAKE PROVIDENCE HARBOR, LA. (See Section 1 of Text) Dredging 0.7-mile channel and turning basin in an old chute of the Mississippi River, with the dredged material used to fill in a port area provided by local interests. MADISON PARISH PORT, LA. (See Section 2 of Text) The project consists of constructing a navigation channel 150 feet wide and 1,000 feet long, transitioning into a 200-foot-wide channel 400 feet long with a 350- by 1,100-foot turning basin adjacent to the port area. Dredged material will be disposed into lands furnished by local interests. OUACHITA AND BLACK RIVERS BELOW CAMDEN, ARK. (See Section 3 of Text) Modification of existing project to provide for 9-foot channel and deepening canal to Felsenthal, Ark. Modification of 9-foot project to provide four new locks and dams and channel improvements. Migratory waterfowl refuges on Bayou D'Arbonne in connection with the pool of the Columbia Lock and Dam and in the pool of the Felsenthal Lock and Dam. ROSEDALE HARBOR, MISS. (See Section 4 of Text) The harbor channel is 150 feet wide and 2.7 miles long with a turning basin 1,000 feet long and 400 feet wide. A minimum operating depth of 9 feet below the lowest water of record (102.5 feet, NGVD) was maintained in both the channel and turning basin and provided a 20-acre landfill to a net elevation of 162.9, NGVD. The landfill is 1,250 feet long and 700 feet wide. An access roadfill was constructed from Mississippi Highway 1 to the port site. YAZOO RIVER, MISS. (See Section 5 of Text) Removal of obstructions to navigation from mouth to Greenwood, Miss., 189 miles. Nine-foot channel from mouth to Greenwood, mile 154.9 (present mileage), with a lock and dam near Vicksburg, channel improvements, alteration of bridges, additional storage space in Sardis Lake to augment low river flows, and recreation features. OUACHITA RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, ARK. AND LA. (See Section 8 of Text) Authorized DeGray Lake; Murfreesboro Lake; extension of floodwall at Monroe to partially close the existing gap; local protection at Bawcomville, La. (subsequently constructed under Sec. 6, Act of May 15, 1928, with local interests contributing one third of cost); Bayou Bartholomew channel improvement, including Deep Bayou and Overflow Creek; Pine Bluff local protection; local protection at Calion, Ark.; and incorporation, into the Ouachita River and Tributaries project, of all existing projects and portions thereof in the basin above the lower end of the levees on the east bank of the Ouachita River. In addition, the Chief of Engineers authorized on Nov. 14, 1966, additional work on the levees. 12-8 Approved Sep. 12, 1962, under authority of Sec. 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960, as amended Approved Sep. 12, 1962, under authority of Sec. 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960, as amended. S. Doc. 117, 81st Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 112, 86th Cong., 2d sess. Report of the Chief of Engineers dated Nov. 25, 1970, and H. Doc. 92-109, 92d Cong., 1st sess. Approved Sep. 12, 1962, under authority of Sec. 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960, as amended. H. Doc. 342, 90th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 117, 81st Cong., 1st sess. VICKSBURG, MISS., DISTRICT TABLE 12-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Acts Work Authorized Documents BAYOU BARTHOLOMEW, ARK. AND LA. (See Section 8D of Text) May 17, 1950 Authorized channel improvements on Bayou and Tributaries S. Doc. 117, 81st Cong., (see above). 1st sess. Nov. 7, 1966 Modified 1950 authorization to include 10 lakes in the west H. Doc. 506, 89th Cong., escarpment in Arkansas and 6 local levees in Louisiana, and 2d sess. acquisition of lands for mitigation of fish and wildlife losses. The previously authorized channel improvement was deferred until it is determined that the quality and quantity of water downstream will not be adversely affected. MONROE FLOODWALL, LA. (See Section 8E of Text) May 17, 1950 Partial closure of gap in floodwall S. Doc. 117, 81st Cong., 2d sess. Oct. 27, 1965 Closure of gap in floodwall (Plan C) H. Doc. 328, 88th Cong., 2d sess. Nov. 7, 1966 Closure of gap in floodwall (Plan B) H. Doc. 328, 88th Cong., 2d sess. 12-9 OUACHITA AND BLACK RIVERS, ARK. AND LA. (9-FOOT PROJECT), LOCKS AND DAMS (See Section 3 of Text) Min. Depth Greatest on Available Lower Miles Length Max. Elev. Miter Above Width for Full Lift Normal Sill at Miles Mouth of Width at Pool Normal from of Lock of Lock Low Surface Pool Nearest Black Chamber Chamber Water (feet Level Location Town River (feet) (feet) (feet) msl) (feet) Jonesville, La. 10 25 84 600 30 34 14 Columbia, La. 5 117 84 600 18 52 13 Felsenthal, 1 227 84 600 18 65 13 Ark. Calion, Ark. 7 283 84 600 12 77 13 Total Per- Character cent or Kind of Com- Estimated Foundation Dam Type of Construction plete Cost Piling Movable Tainter gated dam; bascule gated 100 $ 50,000,0001 navigation pass; steel mitering lock gates do do Tainter gated dam; fixed crest navi- 99 43,500,000 gation pass; steel mitering lock gates Earth do Tainter gated dam; navigation pass 80 83,000,000 with fiberdam on crest; steel mitering lock gates do do Tainter gated dam; bascule gated 61 $ 61,500,000 navigation pass; steel mitering lock gates $238,000,000 1. Includes $6,113,700 for Catahoula Lake diversion channel and control structure. TABLE 12-C I.!lr 0 ti 0 yCd O LTI 0 t z z 0 z C/ VICKSBURG, MISS., DISTRICT TABLE 12-D OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Section 6 of Text) For Last Cost to Sept. 1981 Full Report Operation Mo. and Yr. See Annual and Mo. and Yr. Project Deauthorized Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed Bayou Bartholomew, La. and Ark.1,2 3,4 1931 $ 45,874 $ 42,857 1 Bayous D'Arbonne and Corney, La. 12.4 1941 19,000 37,804 1 Big Black River, Miss.',4,5 1895 15,000 1 Big Sunflower River, Miss. 1'4' 6'7 1942 560,027 459,328 Boeuf River, La.1.3,4,7,8,9 1949 30,000 103,737 1 Homochitto River, Miss.4 - 1910 15,482 8,518 1 Little Missouri River, Ark. 1'4'5 - 1873 19,992 - Little River, La. 4'5 "0 - 1890 1,500 - Little Tallahatchie River, Miss.1.7 1913 19,000 - Mouth of Yazoo River, Miss." 7"11 - 1953 1,179,211 145,217 1 Ouachita and Black Rivers, Ark. and La., Felsenthal Canal 12 Aug. 1977 1937 - - Removing snags and wrecks from Mississippi River below mouth of Missouri River and from Old and Atchafalaya Rivers 1 - 1948 - 272,500 Saline River, Ark.1.3,4,5 1931 26,900 12,792 Tallahatchie and Coldwater Rivers, Miss. ' 4'5 -1939 43,481 173,066 1 Tensas River and Bayou Macon, La. .1. 8 3 1949 38,367 85,352 Yalobusha River, Miss." 4' 5"4 1937 7,000 15,936 1 1. Completion Date unavailable. 9. Project curtailment recommended by elimination of work 2. Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 1962, 64th Cong., 2d above Girard, La. (Abandonment of entire project recommended sess., and H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st sess. erroneously in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st sess.) 3. Channels adequate for existing commerce. 10. Due to decline of traffic, local interests not sufficiently 4. Inactive project. No commerce. interested to provide rights-of-way and dumping privileges. 5. Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st 11. No additional funds available under this project. Work sess. is being carried on under appropriation flood control, Mississippi 6. Project curtailment recommended by elimination of work River and tributaries. between Pentecost and mouth of Hushpuckena River. (Abandonment 12. Year authorized. of entire project erroneously recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 13. Inactive. Channel adequate for commerce. 1st sess.) 14. See report of Mississippi River Commission for operations in 7. See report of Mississippi River Commission for operations in connection with Yazoo Basin flood control project including channel connection with Yazoo Basin. clearing and rectification and Grenada Lake on Yalobusha River. 8. Report of New Orleans District, pp. 919-920 for Fiscal Year 1949. 12-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 12-E OUACHITA RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES: EXISTING PROJECT (See Section 8 of Text) For Last Estimated Full Report Federal See Annual New Work Project Report for: Cost Blakely Mt. Dam-Lake Ouachita, Ark. (1) $44,300,000 DeGray Lake, Ark. (1) 72,034,0002 Narrows Dam-Lake Greeson, Ark. (1) 20,600,000 Calion, Ark. 1960 970,9963 Columbia, La. 1941 204,7403 Existing levees and extensions thereto from Bastrop, La., to mouth of Boeuf River and at West Monroe, La. 1961 3,025,1813 Little Missouri River below Murfreesboro, Ark. 1957 354,8023 Ozan Creek, Ark. 1957 57,7423 Terre Noire Creek, Ark. 1948 123,7003 Pine Bluff, Ark., local protection 1954 172,5823 Monroe, La., floodwall extension (Plan B) (1) 2,561,0003 Bayou Bartholomew and Tributaries, Ark. and La. (1) 44,800,000 Ouachita River Levees (additional work) (1) 9,400,000 Total $198,604,7434 1. See individual reports herein. 3. Actual cost of completed project. 2. Includes $5,800,000 for water supply, to be reimbursed by local 4. Excludes the authorized Murfreesboro Lake, Ark., project, interests. which is inactive. The latest estimated cost (1954) was $4,190,000. TABLE 12-F OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD DAMAGE PREVENTION PROJECTS (See Section 10 of Text) For Last Cost to Sept. 1981 Mo. and Yr. Full Report Operation Mo. and Yr. If See Annual and If Project Deauthorized Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed Big Black River, Miss.' - 1956 $910,185 $670,750 Big Choctaw Bayou, La.1 2 - 1966 248,823 - Buffalo River, Miss.3 - 1940 - - - Homochitto River, Miss.' - 1956 205,000 144,650 1 Natchez Port Area, Miss."' 2 - 1969 538,000 -1 Murfreesboro Dam and Lake3 - 1951 - - - 1. Completion Date Unavailable. 3. Deferred indefinitely because of insufficient justification under 2. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of Sec. 205. present conditions. Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended. 12-12 VICKSBURG, MISS., DISTRICT TABLE 12-G ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (96x3121) Federal Cost Totals by Item and CWIS Number FY 81 Categories SURVEYS (Category 100) Flood Damage Prevention Studies (120) Ouachita River Basin, Ark. & La. -12046 $1,165,460 Pine Bluff Metro Area, Ark. -12015 57,227 1,222,687 Coordination Studies with Other Agencies (180) Dept. Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service (181) -51840 1,008 Water Quality Management (181) -51860 0 Planning Assistance to States (186) -51850 7,952 8,960 TOTAL (Category 100) $1,231,647 COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA (Category 200) Collection and Study of Basic Data (200) Inspection and Inventory of Dams (230) -53843 and -53842 42,723 Flood Plain Management Services (250) Flood Plain Management Services 231,662 Hydrologic Studies (260) Hydrologic Studies (260) -53820 10,912 285,297 TOTAL (Category 200) $ 285,297 RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT (Category 300) 0 0 GRAND TOTAL GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS $1,516,944 12-13 1981 MEMPHIS, TENN., DISTRICT* This district comprises a portion of southeastern Missouri and southern Illinois, western portions of Kentucky and Tennessee, a small portion of northern Mississippi, and the northeastern portion of Arkansas; includes area embraced in drainage basins of eastern tributaries of the Mississippi River south of Ohio River Basin to Nonconnah and Horn Lake Creeks, inclusive, and those of western tributaries south of Little River diversion channel and Commerce, Mo., including St. Francis River Basin and White River and tributaries below Peach Orchard Bluff, Ark., on the right bank and below Augusta, Ark., on the left bank; also includes left bank Mississippi River levee from vicinity of Memphis south to about mile 620, and right bank levees from Cape Girardeau, Mo., to about mile 605. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Caruthersville Harbor, Mo ................... Helena Harbor, Ark. .......................... Hickman Harbor, Ky. ........................ New Madrid Harbor, Mo. ..................... Osceola Harbor, Ark.......................... White River, Ark. (below Newport) ..................................... Wolf River (Memphis Harbor), Tenn. .......... Other authorized navigation projects ........ Navigation work under special authorization .......................... Flood Damage Prevention Dyersburg, Tenn. (Southwest) ................ Treasure Island, Mo. ........................ West Hickman area, Hickman, Ky. ............ Page 13-1 13-2 13-2 13-2 13-2 13-2 13-3 13-3 13-3 13-3 13-4 13-4 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. Flood Damage Prevention (cont.) Long Lake area, Helena, Ark. ................. Huntingdon, Tenn............................. Drinkwater Sewer, Mo ...................... Nonconnah Blvd., Nonconnah Creek, Tenn. .... North Second Street, Memphis, Tenn. (Wolf River Bridge) ......................... Inspection of completed flood damage prevention projects ................. Other authorized flood damage prevention projects ........................... Flood damage prevention work under special authorization ................................. General Investigations 21. Surveys ..... ................. ............. 22. Collection and study of basic data ............. Page 13-4 13-4 13-4 13-4 13-5 13-5 13-5 13-5 13-5 13-5 Navigation 1. CARUTHERSVILLE HARBOR, MO. Location. In Pemiscot County, Mo. in an old river chute 3 miles north of the town of Caruthersville, Mo., on the right bank of the Mississippi River, 349.5 miles above Head of Passes, La. Existing project. Authorized by the Chief of Engineers Nov. 4, 1980, under the authority of Sec. 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960, as amended. Harbor channel construction consisted of removal of 600,000 cubic yards of material from a 300- by 300-foot turning basin and provision of a 9- by 150- foot navigation channel, 4,680 feet long. The excavated material was placed on top bank, between retainer dikes and the mainline Mississippi River levee to form a flood-free fill to be developed as an industrial park by local interests. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Facilities are being provided by the Pemiscot County Port Authority. Operations and results during fiscal year. Leased dredge, Natchez removed 877,127 cubic yards of material at a cost of $278,311 in Aug. 1981 in maintaining project channel. Condition as of Sep. 30. Federal participation in the project is complete except for expected future maintenance dredging. *All cost and financial statements and authorizing legislation for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 13-1 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 2. HELENA HARBOR, ARK. Location. In Phillips County, Ark., on right bank of Mississippi River about 663 miles above Head of Passes, La. (AHP). Existing project. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Sep. 20, 1962, under authority of Sec. 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960, as amended. Provides for maintenance of access channel with a depth 9 feet below low water, between miles 659 and 663 APH, by dredging, and for enlarging the upstream 0.6 mile to dimensions of 9 feet deep by approximately 450 feet wide. Remainder of channel conforms to project width of the main channel of Mississippi River. River stages recorded at Helena gage (zero is 141.70 feet msl) since 1871 have ranged between minus 3.0 and plus 60.21 feet with an average annual fluctuation of 40.6 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are ten terminals within the harbor, two of which are publicly-owned. Others are a rail incline, a small boat dock, grain terminals, a petroleum products terminal, a midstream grocery and refueling service, a fuel unloading facility, and a fertilizer-loading facility. Operations and results during fiscal year. Leased dredge Natchez removed 172,899 cubic yards of material in October 1980 in maintaining project channel. Expenditure was $283,522. Condition as of Sep. 30. Project is incomplete as dredging will be required in October 1981, to maintain project dimensions. 3. HICKMAN HARBOR, KY. Location. In Fulton County, Ky., on left bank of Mississippi River about 922 miles APH. Existing project. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Jul. 12, 1962, under authority of Sec. 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960, as amended. Provides for dredging and maintaining harbor channel 250 feet wide with depth of 9 feet below low water, from main channel of Mississippi River at mile 922 AHP along former city waterfront about 1.1 miles, with the upper 600 feet forming a turning basin 500 feet wide. New work was completed in Fiscal Year 1963. River stages recorded since 1929 at Hickman gage (zero is 264.73 feet msl) have ranged between minus 0.4 and plus 51.5 feet with average annual fluctuation of 38 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Within harbor are terminals for handling petroleum products, sand and gravel, timber and grain, which are publicly and privately owned; there is about 0.2 mile of surfaced, public mooring and launching area. Operations and results during fiscal year. Leased dredge, Natchez, removed 338,583 cubic yards of material in July 1981 in maintaining project channel. Expenditure was $277,569. Condition as of Sep. 30. Project was completed Jan. 20, 1961 and is being maintained to project dimensions. 4. NEW MADRID HARBOR, MO. Location. New Madrid County, Mo., on right bank of the Mississippi River about 889 miles AHP. Existing project. Construction and subsequent maintenance of a harbor channel 150 feet wide with a depth of 9 feet below low water from the head of New Madrid Bar, about mile 889 AHP, along the city waterfront downstream for a distance of about 9,400 feet, with a 250-foot-radius turning basin at the downstream end. The project was authorized by the Chief of Engineers, Feb. 21, 1968, under Sec. 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960, as amended. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Within the harbor are privately owned terminals for handling petroleum products, logs and lumber, and soybeans and grain. Terminal facilities are considered adequate for present and immediately foreseeable commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Expended $513 for Construction and Operation studies. Condition as of Sep. 30. Project was completed Oct. 2, 1970, and is being maintained to project dimensions. 5. OSCEOLA HARBOR, ARK. Location. Mississippi County, Ark., on the right bank of the Mississippi River at about 784 miles AHP. Existing project. The project was authorized by the Chief of Engineers, Sep. 30, 1971, under Sec. 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960, as amended. Harbor channel construction consisted of removal of 689,705 cubic yards of material from the harbor channel to provide a navigation channel 250 feet wide and 9 feet deep from the Mississippi River navigation channel at the downstream end of the old chute of Island 30, upstream along the old bendway channel for a line distance of 6,500 feet. A 250-foot-radius turning basin is provided at the upstream end of the harbor channel. The excavated material removed from the channel was placed on the top bank between the old bendway channel and the main line Mississippi River levee to form a flood-free industrial park to be developed by local interests. Latest published map is in 1980/48th edition, Flood Control and Navigation Maps of the Mississippi River, prepared under the direction of President, Mississippi River Commission. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Public terminal facilities have been provided by Osceola Riverport Authority. Operations and results during fiscal year. Leased dredge, Natchez, removed 770,750 cubic yards of material for channel maintenance. Total expenditure was $694,079. Condition as of Sep. 30. Project, begun Sep. 30, 1970, was completed Nov. 13, 1974 and is being maintained to project dimensions. 6. WHITE RIVER, ARK. (BELOW NEWPORT) Location. Rises in northwestern Arkansas and flows 686 miles first north into Missouri, thence southeasterly through Arkansas to the Mississippi River 64 miles below Helena, Ark. (See Mississippi River Commission alluvial valley maps, scales 1:62,500 and 1:500,000, and map folio, May 1973, of White River, vicinity of Batesville, Ark., to Mississippi River, scale 1:24,000.) White River enters Memphis District at foot of Peach Orchard Bluff, Ark., 165 miles above its mouth; but Memphis District is responsible for maintenance of navigation channel from mile 10.0 to mile 254.0, Newport, Ark. 13-2 MEMPHIS, TENN., DISTRICT Previous projects. For details, see page 1874, Annual Report for 1915, and page 938, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Maintenance of a channel 4.5 feet deep by 100 feet wide between mouth of river and Batesville, 296 miles, by snagging, dredging, and contraction works. Maintenance discontinued after Fiscal Year 1951 due to negligible traffic; dredging and snagging resumed in 1962. White River channel from mouth to mile 10 has been improved and is being maintained as part of the Arkansas River Project. The existing project was modified by OCE, Mar. 11, 1968, under authority of Sec. 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended, to provide a 125-foot-wide channel with minimum depth of 5 feet and a depth of 8 feet at a stage of 12 feet on the Clarendon gage. This modification has been completed and increased dimensions extend from the mouth to Augusta, at mile 199. In February 1971, OCE authorized resumption of maintenance from Augusta to Newport. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminalfacilities. Consist of terminals for handling riprap stone, sand and gravel, logs, soybeans, wheat, and rice at Augusta (mile 198); logs, soybeans, wheat, and rice at Des Arc (mile 143); logs, lumber, soybeans, and rice at Clarendon (mile 99); soybeans at Crocketts Bluff (mile 68); soybeans, rice, sand, gravel, and crushed stone at St. Charles (mile 57); riprap stone at Benzal (mile 7.5), and public launching ramp at I-40 bridge. Operations and results during fiscal year. Dredging was performed at various locations between mile 10 and mile 255 to provide project width and depth. Leased dredges, Andy and Tulsa moved 993,356 cubic yards of material in maintaining project channel. Snagging operations were resumed April 1971 by hired labor. Total project Fiscal Year 1981 cost was $1,258,459. Condition as of Sep. 30. Project is incomplete as additional dredging is needed in October and November 1981. 7. WOLF RIVER (MEMPHIS HARBOR), TENN. Location. Rises near western edge of Tippah County, Miss., and flows generally northwesterly through Shelby County, Tenn., entering the Mississippi River above Memphis, Tenn. (mile 738.7 AHP). The lower 3.5 miles of channel, parallel to the Mississippi River along the Memphis waterfront, became a slack-water harbor when Wolf River was diverted through Mud Island to the Mississippi River by a flood control project, Wolf River and tributaries, under the Flood Control Act of 1958. (See Mississippi River Commission alluvial valley maps, scales 1:62,500 and 1:500,000, and folio of Flood Control and Navigation Maps of the Mississippi River, Cairo, Ill., to Gulf of Mexico, scale 1:62,500, revised annually.) Previous projects. For details see pages 701 and 702, Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. The project provides a channel 9 feet deep at low water from mouth to mile 3, with bottom widths of 250 feet from mouth to Keel Avenue (mile 1.75) and 200 feet from Keel Avenue to mile 3. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Twenty terminals along project channel. One terminal is operated by Coast Guard, two by contract carriers, and 17 are operated privately. Operations and results during fiscal year. Leased dredge Natchez removed 793,597 cubic yards of material in September 1981 in maintaining the channel. Total Fiscal Year 1981 expenditure was $783,129. Condition as of Sep. 30. Project began May 15, 1928 and is incomplete as dredging is required in FY 82. 8. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS See Table 13-C. 9. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Sec. 107, Public Law 86- 645, as amended (preauthorization). During the period $79,158 was expended for a study of Lake County Harbor, Tenn., $15,817 on Wickliff Harbor, Ky., and $13,347 on Coahoma County Harbor, Miss. Flood Damage Prevention 10. DYERSBURG, TENN. (SOUTHWEST) Location. The city is situated on the bank of the North Fork of the Forked Deer River 5 miles upstream from the confluence of the North Fork and Forked Deer River. The project is located in the Finley Street area in the southwestern section of Dyersburg north of the river in the low area between U.S. Highway 51 and U.S. Highway 51 Bypass. Existing project. Authorized Jun. 27, 1972, under authority of Sec. 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended. Construction of a levee beginning at the Highway 51 Bypass and extending 2,000 feet northeast, then 2,200 feet east to the levee around the sewage treatment plant on the south and east sides, and construction of a levee from the northeast corner of the treatment plant northeasterly to high ground just south of the Illinois Central Railroad. Excavation of 23 acres on the landside of the levee to elevation 254.0 feet msl for providing additional storage and construction of a 100-cfs pumping station and an 8- by 8-foot concrete box culvert with sluice gate to evacuate interior drainage from the excavated sump. Construct an 84-inch corrugated metal culvert with flap gate to evacuate interior drainage from an area northeast of the sewage treatment plant. Construction of landside drainage ditches along the levee to divert drainage to excavated area and transition existing ditches into excavated sump to insure proper operation of the project as designed. Construct an outlet channel into North Fork, Forked Deer River. Construction scars and waste areas will be graded to blend into the existing terrain. The levees and excavated areas will be seeded and/or sodded and fertilized to provide erosion protection and improve the appearance of the area. After completion of the final grading, the entire sump area will be landscaped with water-tolerant trees. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. For details, see Page 13-4, Annual Report for FY 1980. Operation and results during fiscal year. A contract for construction was awarded in Fiscal Year 1974. Actual construction began in Fiscal Year 1975. Contract was 13-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 completed in October 1976. Total cost of the project is $1,817,906. Condition as of Sep. 30. Complete. 11. TREASURE ISLAND, MO. Location. In Dunklin County, Mo., in the Little River Drainage District of the St. Francis River Basin near Hornersville, Mo. Existing project. Authorized by the Chief of Engineers, Feb. 21, 1973, under authority of Sec. 205, Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended. Provides for the installation of a 150-cfs electrically powered pumping plant. The new pumping units, combined with the existing 25-cfs pump, will have a total capacity of 175 cfs. Provides flood protection for 7,800 acres of land, of which 7,100 are cleared. Construction which began Oct. 30, 1974 was completed Oct. 15, 1976, at a total Federal cost of $852,600, and local interests assumed operation of the facility on that date. Local cooperation. Local interests have furnished the required assurances. Operations and results during fiscal year. Completed project Mar. 30, 1978.. Condition as of Sep. 30. Complete. 12. WEST HICKMAN AREA, HICKMAN, KY. Location. The project is located in the western section of the city of Hickman, Fulton County, Ky. The area is protected from flooding by the Mississippi River by a levee and floodwall on the west. Existing project. Authorized Nov. 9, 1973, under authority of Sec. 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. The plan of improvement consists of installing a flap gate on the existing box culvert through the old levee to prevent backwater flooding from Bayou du Chien, excavation of a 3.8- acre sump area, and construction of a 190-cfs pumping plant to reduce flooding from interior runoff. About 800 feet of interior channel will be reshaped through the excavated sump area, 190 feet of new outlet ditch will be built from the pump discharge to the existing outlet ditch, and 300 feet of the existing ditch is to be cleaned out and/or enlarged. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. For details, see Page 13-5, Annual Report for FY 1980. Operations and results during fiscal year. Four pump bearing heat sensors were found to be defective and prevented automatic operation as designed. Modification and replacement of the heat sensors was accomplished during FY 1981. Condition as of Sep. 30. Completed Oct. 15, 1976. 13. LONG LAKE AREA, HELENA, ARK. Location. The project is located immediately south of Helena, Phillips County, Ark. The area is protected from flooding by the Mississippi River by the project levee, and primary drainage of the area is through Long Lake Bayou. Existing project. Authorized Dec. 16, 1975, under authority of Sec. 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. The authorized improvements consist of enlargement and cleanout of Long Lake Bayou, extending from the culvert upstream 5.6 miles to a point about 3/4 mile below Rabb Lake or some 10 miles below Helena. The plan also provides for revegetation of rights-of-way (about 100 acres) not required to remain open for channel maintenance purposes; and the project sponsor will be required to maintain the revegetated area after project construction. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. For details, see Page 13-5, Annual Report for FY 1980. Condition as of Sep. 30. Implementation of this project has been delayed pending further notification from project sponsors on rights-of-way. 14. HUNTINGDON, TENN. Location. In Carroll County, Tenn. Existing project. Authorized Aug. 11, 1976, under authority of Sec. 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. The plan consists of 1,110 feet of channel enlargement, 1,870 feet of vertical wall concrete channel and 3,320 feet of grouted riprap channel. Estimated first cost is $1,837,000. Protection to approximately 90 acres of highly developed urban lands will be provided and no significant adverse environmental effects will result. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. For details, see Page 13-5, Annual Report for FY 1980. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was completed Sep. 11, 1981. 15. DRINKWATER SEWER, MO. Location. The Big Lake Basin is located immediately north of Charleston in Scott and Mississippi Counties, Mo., and approximately 4.5 miles west of Cairo, Ill. Existing project. Authorized under authority of Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended. Construction of a 150-cubic-feet-per-second pumping plant just north of the existing gravity outlet, with an 855-foot inlet channel to connect the pumping plant with the existing Big Lake Ditch, and an energy dissipator (baffled outlet) at the pumping plant outfall. This will provide relief during the Mississippi River flood stages, for 8.5 square miles of agricultural land from a watershed totaling 27.6 square miles. Local cooperation. Local interests have furnished the required assurances. Condition as of Sep. 30. Complete June 30, 1980. 16. NONCONNAH BLVD., NONCONNAH CREEK, TENN. Location. The project site is on the left bank of Nonconnah Creek in a reach extending from about 550 feet upstream to 150 feet downstream of the Nonconnah Blvd., Bridge in Shelby County, Memphis, Tenn. Existing project. Authorized under the authority of Section 14 of the Flood Control Act of 1946. This project provides protection for the Nonconnah Blvd. Bridge from streambank caving. The improvements consist of grading and placing riprap on about 700 feet of eroding streambank. Local cooperation. Local interests have furnished the required assurances. 13-4 MEMPHIS, TENN., DISTRICT Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction began in Sep. 1981 and is under way. Completion is expected in early Fiscal Year 1982. 17. NORTH SECOND STREET, MEMPHIS TENN. (WOLF RIVER BRIDGE) Location. The project site is on the left bank of the Wolf River approximately one mile above its confluence with the Mississippi River, at the North Second Street Bridge in Shelby County, Memphis, Tenn. Existing project. Authorized under the authority of Section 14 of the Flood Control Act of 1946. This project provides protection for the North Second Street Bridge from streambank caving. The improvements consist of grading and placing riprap on the eroding river bank, approximately 250 feet downstream and 800 feet upstream from the bridge. Local cooperation. Local interests have furnished the required assurances. Condition as of Sep. 30. Virtually complete, pending approval and acceptance of construction by the city. 18. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD DAMAGE PREVENTION PROJECTS Inspected completed projects at a cost of $83,953 in the period. Total cost as of Sep. 30, 1981, was $636,100. This included in-depth inspection of projects. 19. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD DAMAGE PREVENTION PROJECTS See Table 13-D. 20. FLOOD DAMAGE PREVENTION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Sec. 205, Public Law 858, 80th Cong., as amended (preauthorization). During the period $54,216 was expended for detailed studies on West Helena, Ark., $19,362 on Beech Creek, Ky., $184,206 on Caney Creek, Ark., and $113,308 on Humboldt, Tenn. Completed Kise and Little Hatchie Creeks, Tenn. Reconnaissance Report at a cost of $7,500. Expended $6,224 toward preparation of plans and specifications for construction of emergency bank protection at U.S. Highway 51 Bridge, Nonconnah Creek, Tenn. Emergency flood control activities - repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation). Federal cost was $87,836 for disaster preparedness. General Investigations 21. SURVEYS See Table 13-E 22. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA See Table 13-E. 13-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 13-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Funds to in Text Project Funding FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 Sep. 30, 1981 1. Caruthersville New Work Harbor, Mo. 2. Helena Harbor, Ark. 3. Hickman Harbor, Ky. 4. New Madrid Harbor, Mo. 5. Osceola Harbor Ark. 6. White River, Ark. (below Newport) 7. Wolf River (Memphis Harbor), Tenn. 10. Dyersburg, Tenn. (Southwest) 11. Treasure Island, Mo. 12. West Hickman area, Hickman, Ky. 13. Long Lake area, Helena, Ark. 14. Huntingdon, Tenn. 15. Drinkwater Sewer, Mo. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost $ 35,000 53,988 107,300 111,095 91,300 105,984 -4,700 2,161 $ 25,000 25,682 303,000 164,409 407,000 261,392 445 256,900 1,182,000 290,211 728,340 255,900 1,330,000 527,664 882,348 -2,0 - - 245,600 254,658 5,900 3,381 n n 527,000 520,408 3,550 , UU 1,617 7,901 55,700 20,000 9,447 62,545 - 47,000 1,872 4,455 25,000 370,000 41,914 104,863 - 1,022,000 357,204 905,296 13-6 $ 70,000 53,017 $ 618,500 636,305 280,000 278,311 $ 748,500 768,992 280,000 278,311 90,847 90,847 1,669,400 1,643,584 149,827 149,827 1,526,748 1,522,103 196,373 196,373 366,500 364,455 269,115 269,115 2,430,000 2,409,618 169,9941 169,9942 9,356,603 9,041,145 586,500 586,500 5,561,488 5,549,916 1,820,871 1,820,869 861,5293 861,5283 1,656,6924 1,666,1494 62,000 61,281 2,897,000 2,885,378 1,944,000 1,428,198 66,400 199,782 200,900 347,859 1,000 451 274,900 570,780 917,000 674,208 213,000 59,473 -5,000 5,516 43 42,000 24,410 -39,000 3,629 1,395,000 1,651,613 35,000 535 303,000 283,522 282,000 277,569 513 555,000 694,079 878,200 1,258,457 630,000 783,129 33,194 1,032,000 1,030,028 37,000 60,581 MEMPHIS, TENN., DISTRICT TABLE 13-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) See Section Total Funds to in Text Project Funding FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 Sep. 30, 1981 16. Nonconnah Blvd.; New Work Nonconnah Creek, Approp. - - - 55,000 55,000 Tenn. - - - 21,237 21,237 17. North Second New Work Street, Approp. - 31,000 219,000 - 250,000 Memphis, Tenn. Cost - 19,180 220,105 10,714 249,999 (Wolf River Bridge) 1. Excludes $25,000 expenditures for early construction; includes $20,245 for preauthorization studies on Sec. 107 Project. 2. Excludes $17,500 contributed funds expended. 3. Includes $9,829 for preauthorization studies on Sec. 205 Project. 4. Includes $40,992 for preauthorization studies on Sec. 205 Project. 13-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 13-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Jul. 14, 1960, as amended Jul. 14, 1960, as amended Jul. 14, 1960, as amended Jul. 14, 1960, as amended Jul. 14, 1960, as amended Jul. 13, 1892 Jul. 14, 1960, as amended Aug. 30, 1935 Jul. 3, 1958 Jun. 30, 1948, as amended Jun. 30, 1948, as amended Jun. 30, 1948, as amended June. 30, 1948, as amended Jun. 30, 1948, as amended Jun. 30, 1948, as amended CARUTHERSVILLE HARBOR, MO. (See Sec. 1 of Text) Channel 9 feet deep at low water and 150 feet wide, 4,680 feet long in a right bank chute at mile 849.5 AHP HELENA HARBOR, ARK. (See Sec. 2 of Text) Channel 9 feet deep at low water between miles 659 and 663 AHP. HICKMAN HARBOR, KY. (See Sec. 3 of Text) Channel 9 feet deep at low water and 250 feet wide at mile 922 AHP along former city waterfront 1.1 miles, with upper 600 feet forming turning basin 500 feet wide. NEW MADRID HARBOR, MO. (See Sec. 4 of Text) Channel 9 feet deep at low water and 150 feet wide at mile 889 AHP, along city waterfront 9,400 feet with a turning basin 250 feet wide. OSCEOLA HARBOR, ARK. (See Sec. 5 of Text) Channel 9 feet deep at low water and 250 feet wide, 6,500 feet upstream along the old bendway channel. WHITE RIVER, ARK. (below Newport) (See Sec. 6 of Text) Open channel work, mouth to Batesville. Channel enlargement, mile 10 to Augusta. WOLF RIVER (Memphis Harbor), TENN. (See Sec. 7 of Text) Channel 9 feet deep at low water and 250 feet wide to mile 1.75; 200 feet wide to mile 3.5; thence 125 feet wide to mile 5.5. Flood control work in lieu of navigation improvements above mile 3. DYERSBURG, TENN. (SOUTHWEST) (See Sec. 10 of Text) Levee and pumping station. TREASURE ISLAND, MO. (See Sec. 11 of Text) Installation of a 150-cfs pumping plant. WEST HICKMAN AREA, HICKMAN, KY. (See Sec. 12 of Text) Installation of flap gate on existing culvert; 190-cfs pumping station; and minor channel work. LONG LAKE AREA, HELENA, ARK. (See Sec. 13 of Text) Approximately 5 miles of channel improvement on Long Lake Bayou. HUNTINGDON, TENN. (See Sec. 14 of Text) Channel improvement within the city of Huntingdon. DRINKWATER SEWER, MO. (See Sec. 15 of Text) Pumping station. 13-8 Approved Nov. 4, 19801 Approved Sep. 20, 1962.' Approved Jul. 12, 1962.' Approved Feb. 21, 1968.' Approved Sep. 30, 1971.' Annual Report, 1893, page 2112. Approved Mar. 11, 1968.' H. Docs. 26, 72d Cong., 1st sess., and 45, 74th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 76, 85th Cong., 1st sess. Approved Jun. 27, 1972.2,3 Approved Feb. 21, 1973.2 Approved Nov. 9, 1973.2 Approved Dec. 16, 1975.2 Approved Aug. 11, 1976.2 Approved Jan. 5, 1977.2 TABLE 13-B (Continued) Acts MEMPHIS, TENN., DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized NONCONNAH BLVD., NONCONNAH CREEK. TENN. (See Sec. 16 of Text) Documents Jul. 24, 1946, Stabilization of stream bank caving. Approved Dec. 24, 19804 as amended NO. SECOND ST, MEMPHIS, TENN. (WOLF RIVER BRIDGE). (See Sec. 17 of Text) Jul. 24, 1946, Stabilization-Stream bank caving. Approved Jul. 23, 19794 as amended 1. Authorized under authority of Sec. 107 of the River and 3. Contains latest published map. Harbor Act, as amended. 4. Authorized under authority of Sec. 14 of the 1946 Flood 2. Authorized under authority of Sec. 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act. Control Act, as amended. 13-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 13-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Section 8 of Text) For Last Cost to Sep. 1981 Full Report Operation Mo. and Yr. Mo. and Yr. See Annual and Project Deauthorized Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed Forked Deer River, Tenn., including South Fork' 2 - 1912 $25,000 $ 12,818 - Obion River, Tenn.' 3 1911 28,716 - - Removing snags and wrecks from Mississippi River below mouth of Missouri River and from Old and Atchafalaya Rivers4 '5 - 1948 - 318,833 St. Francis and L'Anguille Rivers and Blackfish Bayou, Ark.1' 2 - 1942 92,000 300,449 1. No commerce. 4. Completion date not available. 2. Existing project is for maintenance only. 5. No funds available under this project. Work being carried on 3. Recommended for abandonment in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st under "Appropriation, Flood Control, Mississippi Riverand tributaries." sess. TABLE 13-D OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD DAMAGE PREVENTION PROJECTS (See Section 19 of Text) For Last Cost to Sep. 1981 Full Report Operation Mo. and Yr. Mo. and Yr. See Annual and Project Deauthorized Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed Big Creek Canal, Millington, Tenn. - 1977 $ 70,363 $ Big Creek and L'Anguille River, White River Basin, Ark.' 6 May 81 1937 Clarendon to Laconia Circle, White River Basin, Ark.' 6 May 81 - - Cottonwood Slough pumping plant, 11.2 - 1964 147,000 - Feb 1964 Dyersburg, Tenn.2 - 1962 229,6493 - Jun 1962 Memphis, Wolf River, and Nonconnah Creek, Tenn. - 1960 11,141,199 - May 1959 Mounds and Mound City, Ohio River Basin, Ill.' - 1955 1,132,704 - Oct 19595 Nixon Creek, Tenn.2 - 1952 62,821 - Dec 1951 1. Inactive, awaiting local cooperation. 4. Work being completed under Mississippi Riverand Tributaries 2. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under small project authority, project. Sec. 205, Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended. 5. Exclusive of Cache River Pumping Station. 3. Includes $21,863 contributed funds. 13-10 MEMPHIS, TENN., DISTRICT TABLE 13-E ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (96x3121) Federal Cost Totals by Item and CWIS Number FY 81 Categories SURVEYS (Category 100) Navigation (110) St. Francis River Navigation, Ark. -10036 $ 27,457 White River Navigation to Batesville, Ark -60740 22,736 50,193 Flood Damage Prevention Studies (120) Memphis Metropolitan Area, Ark., Tenn., & Miss. -12135 301,888 301,888 Coordination Studies with Other Agencies (180) Tech. & Engr. Assist. Shore & Streambank Erosion (188)-51731 1,673 1,673 $353,754 COLLECTIONS AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA (Category 200) Flood Plain Management Services (250) Flood Plain Management Services 207,522 TOTAL (Category 200) $207,522 RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT (Category 300) Research and Development (300) Flood Plain Mgt. (355) Wolf River Basin, Tenn. -83240 3,744 TOTAL (Category 300) $ 3,774 GRAND TOTAL GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS $565,050 13-11 1981 ST. LOUIS, MO., DISTRICT* This district comprises those portions of southwestern Illinois and eastern Missouri embraced in drainage basin of Mississippi River and its western tributaries, exclusive of the Missouri River, from the mouth of the Ohio River to mile 300, and of its eastern tributaries to Hamburg Bay at mile 261 on left bank, exclusive of tributary basin of Illinois Waterway upstream of new La Grange Lock and Dam at mile 80.15 above confluence of the Illinois and Mississippi Rivers. District also includes drainage basin in Missouri tributary to the Little River diversion channel. Report on the Mississippi River between the Missouri River and mile 300 is included in separate report on the Mississippi River between the Missouri River and Minneapolis, Minn. Report on the portion of the Illinois River downstream of new La Grange Lock and Dam is included in report of the Chicago District on the Illinois Waterway, Illinois and Indiana. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page Illinois Waterway, Ill. (St. Louis Dist.) ............................. 14-1 Kaskaskia River, Ill. ....................... 14-1 Mississippi River between Missouri and Minneapolis, Minn. (St. Louis Dist.) (Includes L&D 26 Replacement) .............. 14-2 Mississippi River between Ohio and Missouri Rivers, Mo. and Ill. .............. 14-2 Other Authorized Navigation Projects ........ 14-2 Flood Damage Prevention Columbia Drainage and Levee District No. 3, Ill ............................ . East St. Louis and vicinity, Ill. ............... Eldred and Spankey Drainage and Levee District, Ill. ........................... Harrisonville Drainage and Levee District, Ill. ................................ Hartwell Drainage and Levee District, Ill. ................................. Hillview Drainage and Levee District, Ill. ................................. Kaskaskia Island Drainage and Levee District, Ill. .......................... Kaskaskia River, Ill. ......................... Carlyle Lake, Ill. ............................ Lake Shelbyville, Ill ......................... Village of New Athens, Ill .................... Meramec River Basin, Mo. ................. Meramec Park Lake, Mo. .................... Pine Ford Lake, Mo. ........................ 14-3 14-3 14-3 14-3 14-4 14-4 14-4 14-4 14-4 14-5 14-5 14-5 14-5 14-6 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. Flood Damage Prevention (cont) McGee Creek Drainage and Levee District, Ill................................ Meredosia, Ill., and Meredosia, Willow Creek, and Coon Run Drainage and Levee District, Ill............. Meredosia Lake and Willow Creek Drainage and Levee District, Ill. ............ Mississippi River Agricultural Area 8, M o ... .............. ............ Nutwood Drainage and Levee D istrict, Ill . ... ........ .................. Perry County Drainage and Levee Districts Nos. 1, 2, and 3, Mo .............. Rend Lake, Big Muddy River Ill. ............ Wood River Drainage and Levee District, Ill .......................... Inspection of completed flood damage prevention projects .................. Other authorized flood damage prevention projects .................. Flood damage prevention work under special authorization ............. Multiple-Purpose Project Including Power 26. Clarence Cannon Dam and Reservoir, Salt River, Mo..................... Page 14-6 14-6 14-6 14-7 14-7 14-7 14-7 14-8 14-8 14-8 14-8 14-8 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 13A. 13B. 13C. 14. 14A. 14B. Navigation 1. ILLINOIS WATERWAY, ILL. (ST. LOUIS DIST.) See report on Illinois Waterway, Ill. and Ind., under Chicago District. 2. KASKASKIA RIVER, ILL. Location. The river rises in Champaign County, Ill., about 5 miles northwest of Urbana, in east-central part of State. It flows southwesterly about 325 miles and empties into Mississippi River about 8 miles above Chester, Ill., or about *All costs and financial statements and authorizing legislation for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referred in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 14-1 General Investigations 27. Active Investigations ..................... 14-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 118 miles above mouth of Ohio River. (See Cincinnati sheet of maps of United States published by Army Map Service, scale 1:500,000.) Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1896, page 171. Existing project. Improvement for navigation provides a channel 9 feet deep and 225 wide from mouth to Fayetteville, Ill. Improvement consists of enlarging present channel where required, making overbank cutoffs to eliminate sharp bends, and construction of a dam at mile 0.8 with a single lock 84 feet wide and 600 feet long, at an estimated total Federal project cost (1981) of $156,200,000. Non-Federal project cost is $7,665,000, of which $1,500,000 is local contribution. Local cooperation. State of Illinois passed legislation authorizing Illinois Department of Public Works and Buildings to enter into assurances of local cooperation with the United States. These assurances have been furnished and were accepted Nov. 23, 1965. The State is continuing with land acquisition. Operations and results during fiscal year. Work was continued on railroad relocation. Engineering and design was continued on remaining construction items. Maintenance. Hired labor performed operation and maintenance of the project. Condition as of Sep 30. Project is about 77 percent complete. 3. MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS, MINN. (ST. LOUIS DIST.) (INCLUDES L&D 26 REPLACEMENT) See separate section entitled "Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, Minn.," printed in the Annual Report of the Chief of Engineers. 4. MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN OHIO AND MISSOURI RIVERS, MO. AND ILL. Location. Mississippi River rises in Lake Itasca, Minn., and from that lake flows southerly about 2,340 miles and empties into the Gulf of Mexico. Portion included in this report embraces the 195-mile section known as middle Mississippi, between tributary Ohio and Missouri Rivers about 974 to 1,169 miles from the gulf. See folder by Corps of Engineers of Navigation Charts. Middle and Upper Mississippi River, Cairo, Ill., to Minneapolis, Minn. Previous projects. For details see page 1879 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1014 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The existing project provides for obtaining and maintaining a minimum channel depth of not less than 9 feet, a minimum width of not less than 300 feet at low water, with additional widths in bends from mouth of Ohio River (about 974 miles from gulf) to northern boundary of city of St. Louis, mile 191, thence 200 feet wide, with additional width in bends to mouth of Missouri River, mile 195; to be obtained: (1) by regulating works, for closing secondary channels, contracting river by building new banks where river width is excessive and protecting new and old banks from erosion where necessary to secure permanency at an estimated total Federal cost (1981) of $164,000,000; (2) by dredging to maintain project channels; (3) by construction of works authorized for Chain of Rocks reach in 1945 River and Harbor Act, which approved a comprehensive plan for development of the river at Chain of Rocks to provide for construction of a lateral canal at a cost of $59,720,600; and (4) by construction of a fixed-crest rock-fill dam about 900 feet below Chain of Rocks Bridge, authorized by 1958 River and Harbor Act, at cost of $4,353,000, excluding $7,000 costs to Coast Guard for aids to navigation. Estimated total Federal project cost (1981) is $228,073,600. A small boat harbor opposite Chester, Ill., was deauthorized and excluded from foregoing cost estimate. See H. Doc. 669 (76th Cong., 3d sess.) for report of Chief of Engineers dated Feb. 27, 1940, containing a general plan for improvement of Mississippi River between Coon Rapids Dam and mouth of Ohio River for purposes of navigation, power development, flood control, and needs of irrigation. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Regulating Works: Contract work was continued on stone dike and revetment construction as was engineering and design and supervision and administration. Maintenance. Work consisted of 1,000 feet of dike and 6,000 feet of revetment repair. U.S. plant and hired labor performed channel dredging at 39 locations, removing 6,220,000 cubic yards of material from main channel. Channels dredged had a combined length of 28 miles, an average width of 290 feet, and an average gain in depth of 3.9 feet. Condition and operation studies, recreation planning, engineering and design, and operation and maintenance of Lock and Dam 27 continued. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction on existing project began in 1881 and project has been in beneficial use practically from its inception. Projects on Dam 27 and Chain of Rocks are complete. Work on the project is about 70 percent complete. Work required to complete the project includes construction of 118,850 linear feet of dikes; 123,160 linear feet of revetment; removal of 100,000 cubic yards of rock; and removal of 100,000 cubic yards by dredging. Channel as a whole has been greatly improved by the work completed to date. Dredging is required at low stages to remove temporary shoals and maintain required channel depths. Navigation season formerly extended from mid-February to mid- December, the river is generally closed by ice the remainder of year. However, in recent years increased demands of commerce and use of steel-hull boats have combined to extend navigation season throughout the year except when blocked by heavy ice or gorges. River is generally above 10-foot stage, St. Louis gage, from latter part of February to the latter part of August, during which time project channel depths generally prevail without dredging. Mean stage of river, St. Louis gage, was 8.61 feet for Fiscal Year 1980 and 9.54 feet for Fiscal Year 1981. 5. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS See Table 14-C. 14-2 ST. LOUIS, MO., DISTRICT Flood Damage Prevention 6. COLUMBIA DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT NO. 3, ILL. Location. In Monroe County, Ill., on left bank of the Mississippi River between river miles 156 and 166 above mouth of the Ohio River. (See St. Louis, Mo., map published by Army Map Service, scale 1:250,000.) Previous report. For details, see page 653 of Annual Report for 1959. Existing project. Project area contains about 13,600 acres protected from major floods of the Mississippi River, Columbia Creek, and Fountain Creek by levees. However, when Mississippi River stage exceeds 20 feet on the St. Louis, Mo., gage, substantial damage results from impoundment of precipitation which falls on the area, runoff from adjacent hill land, and Mississippi River seepage. The 1962 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 543, 87th Cong., 2d sess.) provides for construction of two pumping stations to reduce interior flooding. Actual cost is $2,817,970. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Planning is complete. Conditions as of Sep. 30. Project constructed under authority of Flood Control Act of 1936 is complete. Modifications authorized by the 1962 Flood Control Act were completed in August Fiscal Year 1981. 7. EAST ST. LOUIS AND VICINITY, ILL. Location. Project is in St. Clair and Madison Counties, Ill., on the left bank of the Mississippi River between river miles 175 and 195 above the Ohio River. Project includes all bottomlands between bluffs on the east and Mississippi River and Chain of Rocks Canal on the west, and extends from Cahokia diversion channel on the north to Prairie du Pont Creek on the south. (See Corps of Engineers Navigation Charts, Middle and Upper Mississippi River, Cairo, Ill., to Minneapolis, Minn.) Existing project. The 1936 Flood Control Act authorized raising and enlarging existing levee systems by construction or reconstruction of 19.8 miles of levee, including 3.1 miles of floodwall, together with necessary appurtenant works consisting of gravity drainage structures, highway and railroad closure structures, alterations and reconstruction of existing pumping plants, alterations to railroad bridges and approaches at levee crossings, service roads on levee crown, and seepage control measures. Work under this authorization provides the area protection against a flood of about 200-year frequency. The completed 10 miles of levee along Chain of Rocks Canal and Lock 27 provide flood protection on the landward side integral with and to the same degree as the East St. Louis levee. Estimated cost (1980) of work under this authorization is $22,550,100. The Flood Control Act of 1965 modified existing project to provide for channel improvements, diversion ditches, flood plain detention areas, a reservoir on Little Canteen Creek, and a pumping plant to considerably reduce damages resulting from interior flooding. This act also authorized reconstruction of a channel stabilization dam in Cahokia Creek diversion channel to provide protection to adjacent levees and bridges from scour and eventual loss. Estimated total Federal project cost of work under this authorization is $58,400,000 (1981), $29,390,000 for Cahokia Creek Dam, and $35,010,000 for Interior Flood Control. Non-Federal cost is $18,230,000. Local cooperation. Local interests have fully complied with the requirements of local cooperation for work under the 1936 authorization. For work authorized by Flood Control Act of 1965 requirements of local cooperation are fully described on page 14-4 of Fiscal Year 1980 Annual Report. Formal assurances were accepted on the Blue Waters Ditch area on 25 Jun 1981. Operations and results during fiscal year. Planning was continued on project modifications authorized by Flood Control Act of 1965. Condition as of Sep 30. Work authorized by Flood Control Act of 1936 is complete. Construction has not begun on work authorized by Flood Control Act of 1965. 8. ELDRED AND SPANKEY DRAINAGE, AND LEVEE DISTRICT, ILL. Location. The levee district is in Greene County, Ill., on the left bank of the Illinois River between miles 23.8 and 32.3 above the Mississippi River. (See Quincy, Ill.-Mo., sheet of maps of the United States, published by Army Map Service, scale 1:250,000.) Existing project. Project provides for raising and enlarging 15.9 miles of levees, altering discharge line of pumping station, and construction of two highway closure structures and seepage control measures. Project will provide protection to 10,470 acres of land, 9,735 of which are highly productive agricultural lands, against a flood of 50-year frequency. Estimated total Federal project cost (1981) is $11,500,000. Non-Federal cost is $1,310,000. Project was authorized by the 1962 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess.). Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation are fully described on page 14-4 of Fiscal Year 1980 Annual Report. Local interests have indicated a willingness to meet the terms of local cooperation. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning was continued. Condition as of Sep 30. Construction has not begun. 9. HARRISONVILLE LEVEE AND DRAINAGE DISTRICT, ILL. Location. The district is in Monroe County, Ill., on the left bank of the Mississippi River between river miles 141 and 156 above the mouth of Ohio River. (See St. Louis, Mo., map published by Army Map Service, scale 1:250,000.) Previous project. For details, see page 676 of Annual Report for 1957. Existing project. Project area contains about 27,800 acres protected from floods of the Mississippi River and Fountain Creek by levees. However, when Mississippi River stage exceeds 15 feet on the St. Louis, Mo., gage, substantial damage results from impoundment of precipitation which falls on the area, runoff from adjacent hill land, and Mississippi River seepage. The Flood Control Act of 1962 provides for construction of two pumping stations to reduce interior flooding. Actual cost is $5,829,000. 14-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation are fully described on page 14-5 of Fiscal Year 1980 Annual Report. The sponsors have furnished assurances of necessary cooperation. Operations and results during fiscal year. Planning is complete. Conditions as of Sep 30. Project constructed under authority of Flood Control Act of 1936 is complete. Modifications authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1962 were completed in March 1981. 10. HARTWELL DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, ILL. Location. The levee district is in Greene County on the left bank of the Illinois River between miles 38.2 and 43.1 above the Mississippi River. (See Quincy, I11.-Mo., sheet of maps of the United States, published by Army Map Service, scale 1:250,000.) Existing project. Project provides for construction of 12.3 miles of new or enlarged levees, altering discharge line of pumping station and construction of seepage control measures. Project will provide protection to 9,630 acres of land, 8,955 of which are highly productive agricultural lands against a flood of 50-year frequency. Estimated total Federal project cost (1981) is $10,700,000. Non-Federal cost is $1,020,000. Project was authorized by the 1962 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess.). Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation are fully described on page 14-5 of Fiscal Year 1980 Annual Report. Local interests have indicated a willingness to meet the terms of local cooperation. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning was continued. Condition as of Sep 30. Construction has not begun. 11. HILLVIEW DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, ILL. Location. The levee district is in Greene and Scott Counties, Ill., on the left bank of the Illinois River between miles 43.2 and 50.0 above the Mississippi River. (See Quincy, Ill.-Mo., sheet of maps of the United States, published by Army Map Service, scale 1:250,000.) Existing project. Project provides for construction of 14.3 miles of levee, alteration of discharge lines for three existing pumping stations, construction of a railroad closure structure, and seepage control measures. Project will provide protection to the Village of Hillview and to 13,070 acres of agricultural land against a flood of 50-year frequency. Estimated total Federal project cost (1981) is $10,700,000. Non-Federal cost is $1,105,000. Project was authorized by the 1962 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess.). Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation are fully described on page 14-6 of Fiscal Year 1980 Annual Report. Local interests have indicated a willingness to meet the terms of local cooperation. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning was continued. Condition as of Sep 30. Construction has not begun. 12. KASKASKIA ISLAND DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, ILL. Location. In Randolph County, Ill., on the right bank of the Mississippi River between miles 111 and 116 above the mouth of the Ohio River. (See Paducah, Ky., Ill., Mo., Ind., map published by Army Map Service, scale 1:250,000.) Previous project. For details, see page 1375 of Annual Report for 1950. Existing project. Project area contains about 9,460 acres only partially protected against flood stage of 38.5 feet on the Chester, Ill., gage. Flooding occurs about once in every 7.3 years with an average duration of 26 days, causing substantial damage. The 1962 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 519, 87th Cong., 2d sess.) provides for enlarging and raising the existing levee about 8 feet to provide protection against a flood having a frequency of once in 50 years. Estimated total Federal project cost (1981) is $14,000,000. Non-Federal cost is $2,045,000. Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation are fully described on page 14-6 of Fiscal Year 1980 Annual Report. Local interests have indicated a willingness to meet the terms of local cooperation. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning is complete and work is proceeding on plans and specifications. Condition as of Sep 30. Construction was initiated on the gravity drains in May and June, Fiscal Year 1981. 13. KASKASKIA RIVER, ILL. Location. The river rises in Champaign County, Ill., about 5 miles northwest of Urbana, in east-central part of the State. It flows generally southwesterly about 325 miles and empties into the Mississippi River about 8 miles above Chester, Ill., or 118 miles above mouth of Ohio River. (See Nashville and Cincinnati sheets of maps of United States, published by Army Map Service, scale 1:500,000; also Geological Survey quadrangle maps, 1:62,500.) Existing project. The 1936 Flood Control Act provides for construction of a dam at Carlyle. The 1958 Flood Control Act provides for construction of a dam at Shelbyville; a levee project at Vandalia, presently inactive; a levee project at Dively; and a local protection project at New Athens. Under the plan, Carlyle Lake and Lake Shelbyville would be operated as a multiple-purpose project for local and Mississippi River flood control, domestic and industrial water supply, releases in the interest of navigation on the Mississippi River, fish and wildlife conservation, and recreation items with 711 funds. Operations and results during fiscal year. Construction continued on Carlyle Lake and Lake Shelbyville. Maintenance. Continued on Carlyle and Shelbyville. Condition as of Sep 30. See individual reports for Carlyle Lake, Lake Shelbyville, and Village of New Athens. Due to lack of local interest Levee Districts Nos. 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 13, 22, 27, 28, and 28A have been deauthorized under the provisions of Sec. 12, Public Law 93-251. 13A. CARLYLE LAKE, ILL. Location. Dam is on Kaskaskia River at mile 107, about 1 mile upstream from Carlyle, Ill. Reservoir extends northeast- 14-4 ST. LOUIS, MO., DISTRICT ward through Clinton, Marion, Bond, and Fayette Counties, Ill., to river mile 153. (See Cincinnati sheet of maps of United States published by Army Map Service, scale 1:500,000. Also see Geological Survey quadrangle maps, scale 1:62,500.) Existing project. The project consists of a compacted earthfill dam with a concrete spillway section. Spillway structure consists of an ogee overflow section surmounted by four 38- by 39-foot tainter gates. Dam crest is 67 feet above streambed and 6,570 feet long. Because of topography near dam, it was necessary to construct two earth-fill saddle dams east of Carlyle, in order to contain maximum pool level proposed for reservoir. A loop levee was constructed for protection of Keyesport, Ill. Relocation or alterations were required to Chicago, Burlington, and Quincy Railroad, highways, pipelines, oil field facilities, water supply facilities, power and telephone lines, and cemeteries. Maximum reservoir area is 57,500 acres and maximum storage capacity is 983,000 acrefeet; permanent pool area is 26,000 acres. Actual total Federal project cost is $42,819,400 of which $8,844,200 is for lands and damages. Non-Federal local contribution toward cost of project is $3,638,900 for water supply. Federal cost for Code 711 recreation facilities is $813,500. Local cooperation. In accordance with provisions of authorizing act, cost of storage to be allocated to water supply in Carlyle Lake and annual cost of operation and maintainance of such storage would be reimbursed by the users. State of Illinois executed a contract with the United States providing for payment of 7.85 percent of cost of project and 8.62 percent of actual Federal costs for operation and maintenance. Precentages set forth were determined by separable cost-remaining benefits methods. Contract was approved by the Secretary of the Army. Operations and results during fiscal year. All major items of work are essentially complete. Construction was continued on recreation facilities. Maintenance. Hired labor forces performed operation and maintenance of Carlyle Lake. Condition as of Sep 30. To date, 37,470 acres of land have been acquired in fee, and an additional 25,339 acres in easements. Project is essentially complete. 13B. LAKE SHELBYVILLE, ILL. Location. Dam is on the Kaskaskia River at mile 221.8, about one-half mile upstream from Shelbyville, Ill. Lake will extend northeastward through Shelby, Moultrie, and Coles Counties, Ill., to approximate river mile 275. (See Decatur sheet of maps of United States published by Army Map Service, scale 1:250,000, and Geological Survey quadrangle maps, scale 1:62,500.) Existing project. The project consists of a compacted earthfill dam with a concrete spillway section. Spillway structure consists of an ogee overflow section surmounted by three 45-by 37-foot tainter gates. Dam crest is 108 feet above streambed and 3,000 feet long. Relocations or alterations were required to railroads, highways, cemeteries, and miscellaneous utilities. Maximum storage capacity is 684,000 acre-feet. Estimated total Federal project cost (1980) is $44,000,000, of which $12,115,000 is for lands and damages. Local contribution toward cost of project is $17,054,900, of which $4,300,000 is for water supply. Estimated Federal cost for Code 711 recreation facilities is $5,365,000, and non-Federal cost is $3,705,000. Local cooperation. Local interests have contributed toward cost of this project 7.06 percent of total cost for water-supply benefits provided, 6.86 percent of total cost for land enhancement, and 9.65 percent of total cost plus 5.75 percent of total cost of Carlyle Lake for recreation and fish and wildlife benefits. Operations and results during fiscal year. All major items of work are complete. Construction was continued on recreation facilities. Maintenance. Hired labor forces performed operation and maintenance of Lake Shelbyville. Condition as of Sep 30. Project is essentially complete. Lands acquired to date are 34,339 acres in fee and 6,144 acres in easements. 13C. VILLAGE OF NEW ATHENS, ILL. Location. New Athens is in St. Clair County, Ill., on Kaskaskia River at mile 4.1 (See Belleville sheet of maps of United States published by Army Map Service, scale 1:250,000.) Existing project. Provides for construction of 6,875 feet of earth levee, a pumping station, drainage structures, and sewer alterations. Actual Federal project cost is $1,983,000. Non-Federal cost is $134,000. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Costs incurred were for closing of levee at existing State Highway. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was complete in September Fiscal Year 1981. 14. MERAMEC RIVER BASIN, MO. Location.The basin lies within the State of Missouri and comprises 3,980 square miles. The river is a west bank tributary of the Mississippi River at mile 161 above mouth of Ohio River. Major streams in the basin include the Meremec, Big, and Bourbeuse Rivers. The basin extends about 100 miles southwesterly from St. Louis into the Ozark Highlands. (See St. Louis, Mo., and Rolla sheets of maps of the United States, published by Army Map Service, scale 1:250,000.) Existing project. The project provides for the construction of Meramec Park and Union Lakes, authorized by the 1938 Flood Control Act; and Pine Ford, Irondale, and I-38 Lake projects, and 19 angler-use sites, authorized by the 1966 Flood Control Act. Under the plan, Irondale and I-38 Lakes will reduce flood damages in the upper Big and Bourbeuse Rivers. Meramec Park, Union, and Pine Ford Lakes will substantially reduce flooding in the lower basin area and will lower flood crests on the Mississippi River. Project will also provide water supply, water quality control, recreation, and fish and wildlife conservation. (See Table 14-D for additional data on this comprehensive project.) 14A. MERAMEC PARK LAKE, MO. Location. Dam will be at mile 108.7 on Meramec River in Franklin County near Sullivan, Mo. Reservoir will be mainly in Crawford, Franklin, and Washington counties, Mo. (See St. Louis, Mo., sheet of maps of the United States, published by Army Map Service, scale 1:250,000.) 14-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 Existing project. Project as authorized by 1938 Flood Control Act provides for construction of an earth dam about 167 feet high with a crest length of 3,000 feet. Reservoir will provide 1 million acre-feet of storage and provide flood protection for 11,862 acres of flood plain in the Meramec River valley above the mouth of Bourbeuse River, and partial protection for 20,209 acres of land below the Bourbeuse. Project will also provide water supply, water quality control, storage, and recreation, and fish and wildlife benefits. Estimated total project cost (1981) is $220,000,000, including $22,506,000 local reimbursement for water supply. Local cooperation. Local interest must contribute toward cost of project for storage allocated to water supply in accordance with the Water Supply Act of 1958. State of Missouri, acting through its State Water Resources Board and under authority of the General Assembly of State of Missouri, executed assurances for water supply on Aug 23, 1967. The assurances were reviewed by the Office of the Attorney General, State of Missouri, and it is his opinion that the State of Missouri has the legal authority and financial capability to execute said assurances. These assurances have been approved by the Chief of Engineers. A water-supply contract will be entered into with the sponsor before any use of the water-supply storage provided under this contract. Operations and results during fiscal year. Construction is complete on an administration visitor center building, overlook area, sewage treatment system, and access road. Construction was completed on Phase I Spillway. Maintenance. Hired labor forces performed operations and maintenance of existing facilities. Condition as of Sep 30. Construction and planning have ceased due to lack of funding. To date 25,944 acres have been acquired in fee and an additional 2,119 acres in easements. 14B. PINE FORD LAKE, MO. Location. Dam is on Big River at mile 43.8, about 45 miles southwest of St. Louis. The Big River is a tributary of the Meramec. Lake will extend about 34 miles up Big River. (See St. Louis, Mo., sheet of maps of the United States, published by Army Map Service, scale 1:250,000.) Existing project. Project provides for construction of a compacted earth-fill dam with a concrete chute spillway. Dam will be 141 feet high and 2,070 feet long. Construction of new roads, improvements of existing roads, alterations to pipeline, power and telephone lines, and construction of recreational facilities are included. Maximum storage capacity will be 285,000 acre-feet. Estimated total project cost (1981) is $133,000,000, of which $7,394,800 and $20,801,200 are local reimbursements for water supply and recreation and fish and wildlife respectively. Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute toward cost of project for storage allocated to water supply in accordance with the Water Supply Act of 1958. The State of Missouri demonstrated sufficient interest and approval of the basin plan to warrant the assumption at this time that necessary local cooperation will be forthcoming. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning continued. Condition as of Sep 30. Construction has not started. 15. MCGEE CREEK DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, ILL. Location. The levee district is in Brown and Pike Counties, Ill., on the right bank of Illinois River between miles 67.2 and 75.1 above the Mississippi River. (See Kansas City sheet of maps of United States, published by Army Map Service, scale 1:500,000.) Existing project. Project provides for reconstruction of 14.7 miles of levee, construction of a new pumping plant, closure structure, and seepage control measures. Project will provide protection to about 12,080 acres of agricultural land against a flood of about 50-year frequency. Estimated total Federal project cost (1981) is $21,400,000. Non-Federal cost is $930,000. Project was authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess.). Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation are fully described on page 14-9 of Fiscal Year 1980 Annual Report. Local interests have executed assurances in compliance with Public Law 91-611 and Public Law 91-646. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning is complete. Condition as of Sep 30. Construction is complete on the upper flank levee. The riverfront levee and the lower part of the lower flank levee are under construction. 16. MEREDOSIA, ILLINOIS, AND MEREDOSIA, WILLOW CREEK, AND COON RUN DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICTS, ILL. Location. The levee district is in Morgan and Scott Counties, Ill., on the left bank of the Illinois River between miles 67.0 and 72.2 above the Mississippi River. (See Quincy, I11.-Mo., sheet of maps of the United States, published by Army Map Service, scale 1:250,000.) Existing project. Project provides for construction of 11.0 miles of new or enlarged levee, a pumping plant, closure structure, and seepage control measures. Project will provide protection to 8,215 acres of land, 7,640 of which are highly productive agricultural lands, and 575 acres of noncrop and farmsteads against a flood of 50-year frequency. Estimated total Federal project cost (1981) is $10,100,000. Non-Federal cost is $980,000. Project was authorized by the 1962 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess.). Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation are fully described on page 14-9 of Fiscal Year 1980 Annual Report. Local interests have indicated a willingness to meet the terms of local cooperation. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning was continued. Condition as of Sep 30. Construction has not begun. 17. MEREDOSIA LAKE AND WILLOW CREEK DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, ILL. Location. The project is in Cass and Morgan Counties, Ill., on the left bank of the Illinois River between miles 72.2 and 79.0 above the Mississippi River. (See Quincy, I11.-Mo. sheet of maps of the United States, published by Army Maps Service, scale 1:250,000.) 14-6 ST. LOUIS, MO., DISTRICT Existing project. Project provides for construction of 15.9 miles of new or enlarged levee, closure structure, drainage facilities, and seepage control measures. Project will provide protection to 7,510 acres of land, 6,980 of which are highly productive agricultural lands, and 530 acres of non-crop and farmsteads against a flood of 50-year frequency. Estimated total Federal project cost (1981) is $8,600,000. Non-Federal cost is $505,000. Project was authorized by the 1962 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess.). Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation are fully described on page 14-10 of Fiscal Year 1980 Annual Report. Local interests have indicated a willingness to meet the terms of local cooperation. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning was continued. Condition as of Sep 30. Construction has not begun. 18. MISSISSIPPI RIVER AGRICULTURAL AREA 8, MO. Location. Area 8 is in Lincoln and Pike Counties, Mo., on west bank of Mississippi River between river miles 249 and 261 above the Ohio River. Small community of Elsberry lies within the area. (See Quincy sheet of maps of the United States, published by Army Map Service, scale 1:250,000.) Existing project. The 1966 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 510, 89th Cong., 2d sess.) authorized the raising and enlarging of existing levees to provide 24.4 miles of riverfront, flank, and back levees and construction of appurtenant works consisting of drainage structure, highway and railroad closure structures, and alterations to existing pumping plants. The project has been reduced in scope to consist of replacing one existing drainage structure, replacing an obsolete stream driven pump unit with a new one of 150 cubic feet per second capacity, and rehabilitation of the pump station. Project will afford protection to the area against a flood of 50-year frequency. Estimated total Federal project cost (1980) is $2,400,000. Non-Federal cost is $20,000. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. See page 14-10 of FY 1980 Annual Report. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning is complete. Condition as of Sep 30. Local interests have been reimbursed under Sec. 215, PL 90-483, for cost they incurred for pumping plant improvement. Construction of gravity drain is complete. Engineering and design of pumping station rehabilitation is continuing. 19. NUTWOOD DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, ILL. Location. The levee district is in Greene and Jersey Counties, Ill., on the left bank of the Illinois River between miles 15.2 and 23.7 above the Mississippi River. (See Quincy, Ill.-Mo., sheet of maps of the United States, published by Army Map Service, scale 1:250,000.) Existing project. Project provides for raising and enlarging 11.4 miles of levee, construction of 1.0 mile of new levee, altering discharge line of pumping station, and construction of seepage control measures. Project will provide protection to 10,360 acres of land, 9,635 of which are highly productive agricultural lands against a flood of 50-year frequency. Estimated total Federal project cost (1981) is $8,390,000. Non- Federal cost is $800,000. Project was authorized by the 1962 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess.). Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation are fully described on page 14-11 of Fiscal Year 1980 Annual Report. Local interests have indicated a willingness to meet the terms of local cooperation. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning was continued. Condition as of Sep 30. Construction has not begun. 20. PERRY COUNTY DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, & 3, MO. Location. Districts are in Perry County, Mo., and Randolph County, Ill., on the right bank of the Mississippi River between river miles 95 and 111 above the mouth of the Ohio River. (See Paducah, Ky., Ill., Mo., Ind., map published by Army Map Service, scale 1:250,000.) Previous project. For details, see 475 of Annual Report for 1968. Existing project. Project area contains about 26,881 acres protected from floods of the Mississippi River by levees. However, when Mississippi River stage exceeds 13 feet on the Chester, Ill., gage, substantial damage results from impoundment of precipitation or seepage, or a combination thereof. Authorized project provides for construction of four pumping stations to reduce interior flooding. Estimated total Federal project cost (1981) is $8,400,000. Non-Federal cost is $52,000. Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation are fully described on page 14-11 of Fiscal Year 1980 Annual Report. Assurances were furnished by local interests (presently, Bois Brule Levee District, Mo.), on Nov. 16, 1978, and were accepted Nov. 27, 1978, by the District Engineer under delegated authority. Operations and results during fiscal year. A contract was awarded for Missouri Chute and Bois Brule pumps and motors. Planning continued on other project features. Condition as of Sep 30. Construction was continued on Cinque Hommes and Jones Cutoff pumping stations. 21. REND LAKE, BIG MUDDY RIVER, ILL. Location. The lake is in Franklin and Jefferson Counties in southern Illinois. The dam is on Big Muddy River, 103.7 miles upstream from its confluence with the Mississippi River, and about 3 miles northwest of Benton, Ill. (See Belleville sheet of maps of United States, published by Army Map Service, scale 1:250,000, and Geological Survey quadrangle maps, 1:62,500.) Existing project. The project provides for construction of an earth dam, ungated concrete spillway, relocation of roads and utilities, recreational facilities, access roads, and service facilities. In addition, two subimpoundment dams were constructed on upper arms of reservoir to enhance fish and wildlife value of project. Reservoir has an area of 24,800 acres, and a storage capacity of 294,000 acre-feet. Project provides flood control, water supply, low-flow regulations, conservation of fish and wildlife, recreation, and area redevelopment. 14-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 Estimated total Federal project cost (1980) is $43,490,800, of which $12,197,700 is for lands and damages. Non-Federal local contribution for water supply is $9,941,300. Estimated Federal cost for code 711 recreation facilities is $1,177,000. Non-Federal cost is $60,000. Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation are fully described on page 14-12 of Fiscal Year 1980 Annual Report. Assurance of local cooperation and water supply contract have been executed and approved by the Secretary of the Army. Operations and results during fiscal year. Construction continued on recreation facilities. Maintenance. Hired labor forces performed operation and maintenance of Rend Lake Reservoir. Condition as of Sep 30. Project is essentially complete. Lands acquired to date are 39,857 acres in fee and 906 acres in easements. 22. WOOD RIVER DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, ILL. Location. In Madison County, Ill., on left bank of Mississippi River between river miles 195 and 203 above Ohio River. District includes bottom lands between river and bluffs and extends from Cahokia diversion channel on the south to opposite lock and dam No. 26 at Alton, Ill., on the north. Small industrial cities of Hartford, Wood River, Roxana, and East Alton and part of Alton riverfront, lie within the district. (See Corps of Engineers Navigation Charts, Middle and Upper Mississippi River, Cairo, Ill., to Minneapolis, Minn.) Existing project. The 1938 Flood Control Act authorized raising, enlarging, and extending existing levee system to provide 20.8 miles of levees and construction of appurtenant works consisting of gravity drainage structures, highway and railroad closure structures, alterations to existing or construction of new pumping plants; surfacing service road on levee crown, making necessary alterations to railroad tracks and bridges at levee crossings, seepage corrective measures and construction of a low-water dam at mouth of Wood River. Project will afford protection to this district against a flood of about 200-year frequency. Estimated total construction cost (1981) is $18,200,000 (excluding $23,000 contributed funds). Flood Control Act of 1965 modified 1938 Flood Control Act to provide for construction of a pumping station with collector ditches and necessary appurtenant facilities for removal of water impounded by existing levee. This portion of the project has been declared inactive. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for work authorized by 1938 Flood Control Act. Operation and results during fiscal year. Work authorized by the 1938 Flood Control Act is complete except for 1200 feet of levee and two closure structures. Design of these items is progressing. Condition as of Sep 30. Construction has not begun. 23. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD DAMAGE PREVENTION PROJECTS Inspection of completed work was accomplished at a cost of $348,114 for the fiscal year. Total cost as of end of fiscal period is $3,767,476. 24. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD DAMAGE PREVENTION PROJECTS See Table 14-E. 25. FLOOD DAMAGE PREVENTION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Snagging and clearing of navigable streams and tributaries in interest of flood control (Sec. 208 of 1954 Flood Control Act, Public Law 780, 83d Cong.). Cost for the fiscal year for Walnut Creek, Ill., was $7,500. Emergency flood control activities-repair,fl ood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation). Federal costs for the fiscal year were $63,880 for disaster preparedness, $565,359 for rehabilitation, and $746 for advance measures. Multiple-Purpose Project Including Power 26. CLARENCE CANNON DAM AND RESERVOIR, SALT RIVER, MO. Location. Salt River rises in Schuyler County, about 12 miles south of Missouri-Iowa State line. It flows southeasterly about 192 miles and empties into Mississippi River about 2 miles above Louisiana, Mo., or about 284 miles above mouth of Ohio River. (See Kansas City and Quincy sheets of maps of United States published by Army Map Service, scale 1:500,000 and Geological Survey quadrangle maps, 1:250,000.) Previous project. For details, see page 645 of Annual Report for 1963. Existing project. Project provides for construction of a multiple-purpose reservoir, including power, flood control, water supply, navigation storage, pollution abatement, fish and wildlife conservation, and recreation. Dam consists of a compacted earth embankment with a concrete spillway controlled by tainter gates. Dam and spillway are about 1,700 feet long. Spillway structure consists of an ogee overflow section surmounted by four 50- by 30-foot tainter gates. Reservoir will have a storage capacity of 1,428,000 acre-feet for use of flood control, future domestic and industrial water supply, sediment storage, and power generation. Project document plan provides for installation of two 27,000 kilowatt units, one conventional and one reversible, to be used for pumped storage operations. Total Federal project cost estimate (1981) is $265,000,000 of which $20,800,000 is for lands and damages, and $11,400,000 is for water supply. Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation are fully described on page 14-13 of Fiscal Year 1980 Annual Report. Assurances have been received from the State of Missouri and approved by the Chief of Engineers. Operations and results during fiscal year. The contracts for the generators, main dam and spillway, power plant, state highway relocations, and reservoir clearing are under way. Contracts for the powerhouse equipment have been awarded and virtually all powerhouse equipment is in storage at the 14-8 ST. LOUIS, MO., DISTRICT project site. The Phase I main dam and abutment exploration, the re-regulation dam and spillway, the Norfolk and Western Railroad relocation, the administration building, nine access areas, and overlook area contracts are complete. Planning on additional project features is continuing. acquired to date are 54,660 acres in fee and 9,985 acres in easements. cneral Tnvestiastinsg Overtopping of the third stage cofferdam and the partially completed main dam embankment, due to flooding on the Salt River, occurred in July 1981 which resulted in substantial 27. ACTIVE INVESTIGATIONS damage and resultant remedial works. See Table 14-F which covers: Surveys, Collection and study Condition as of Sep 30. Project is 89 percent complete. Lands of basic data, and Research and development activities. 14-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 14-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Funds to in Text Project Funding FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 Sep. 30, 1981 2. Kaskaskia River New Work Ill. (Regular Approp. $2,800,000 $7,600,000 $5,000,000 $3,635,000 $120,391,0001 Funds) Cost 3,872,754 8,289,750 5,009,434 3,478,872 120,208,8701 Maint. Approp. 890,000 975,400 779,400 929,000 6,070,400 Cost 883,878 941,353 710,908 1,025,322 6,040,772 (Contrib. Funds) New Work Contrib. 0 0 0 0 1,244,078 Cost 0 12,535 0 0 1,076,160 4. Mississippi River New Work Between Ohio and Approp. 3,000,000 2,940,000 3,450,000 3,075,000 159,719,6002 Missouri Rivers Cost 2,381,784 3,640,376 3,838,008 3,051,785 159,505,0932 (Includes Chain of Rocks Maint. Approp. 9,807,000 7,221,300 9,017,900 9,121,000 168,377,4773 Cost 9,626,398 5,381,847 9,675,719 8,919,608 166,680,1603 6. Columbia Drainage New Work & Levee District Approp. 1,200,000 -195,000 -45,000 -8,000 2,818,0004 No. 3, Ill. Cost 634,279 411,830 70,079 20,663 2,817,9704 7. East St. Louis and New Work Vicinity, Ill. Approp. 1,200,000 520,000 580,000 725,000 30,347,3885 Cost 848,613 892,564 699,638 432,485 29,956,2256 8. Eldred & Spankey New Work Drainage and Levee Approp. 135,000 120,000 105,000 400,000 875,000 District, Ill. Cost 119,452 132,191 100,453 369,419 810,380 9. Harrisonville Levee New Work & Drainage Approp. 0 0 0 0 5,829,0007 District, Ill. Cost 151,454 48,983 28,073 27,329 5,829,0007 10. Hartwell Drainage New Work & Levee District, Approp. 75,000 67,000 230,000 250,000 622,000 Ill. Cost 51,229 76,528 156,347 190,624 474,728 11. Hillview Drainage New Work & Levee District Approp. 0 60,000 190,000 183,000 433,000 Ill. Cost 0 32,709 193,215 147,733 373,657 12. Kaskaskia Island New Work Drainage & Levee Approp. 223,000 130,000 400,000 1,363,000 2,718,000 District, Ill. Cost 92,499 257,533 366,150 1,160,083 2,389,302 13A. Carlyle Lake, Ill. New Work (Regular Funds) Approp. 0 0 0 0 42,819,400 Cost 12,286 450 0 0 42,819,400 Maint. Approp. 2,182,000 3,993,600 2,403,800 2,067,000 23,380,200 Cost 2,215,623 3,052,099 3,150,180 2,209,001 23,305,136 Code 711 Funds New Work Approp. 74,000 25,000 0 0 813,535 Cost 351,982 67,134 24,582 0 813,535 (Contrib. Funds) New Work Contrib. 144,207 0 0 0 3,638,868 Cost 134,384 12,036 0 0 3,638,868 Maint. Contrib. 233,509 0 0 0 1,092,913 Cost 233,266 243 0 0 1,092,913 13B. Lake Shelbyville, New Work Ill. (Regular Approp. 0 0 0 0 44,000,000 Funds) Cost 313,291 10,239 8,414 262 43,999,951 Maint. Approp. 2,842,840 3,377,400 2,656,800 2,245,000 20,866,040 Cost 2,698,334 3,132,474 2,715,339 2,595,905 20,734,676 14-10 __ ST. LOUIS, MO., DISTRICT TABLE 14-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) See Section Total Funds to in Text Project Funding FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 Sep. 30, 1981 13B. Code 711 Funds New Work Lake Shelbyville, Ill. (Contrib. Funds) 13C. Village of New Athens, Ill. 14A. Meramec Park Lake, Mo. 14B. Pine Ford Lake, Mo. 15. McGee Creek Drainage & Levee District, Ill. 16. Meredosia, Ill., and Meredosia, Willow Creek and Coon Run Drainage & Levee Districts, Ill. 17. Meredosia Lake and Willow Creek Drainage & Levee District, Ill. 18. Mississippi River Agricultural Area No. 8, Ill. 19. Nutwood Drainage & Levee District, Ill. 20. Perry County Drainage & Levee District Nos. 1, 2, & 3, Mo. 21. Rend Lake, Big Muddy, Ill. (Regular Funds) Code 711 Funds (Contrib. Funds) Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost $ 734,000 220,655 220,336 457,798 197,134 190,288 00 0 -89,819 324,000 287,105 865,000 807,473 00 $ 245,000 645,997 0 8,704 0 6,847 50,000 11,122 0 93,743 123,000 147,429 600,000 662,744 500,000 496,207 0 40,000 0 22,456 0 50,000 0 32,508 0 1,468 110,000 97,251 100,000 327,129 $ 0 2,592 2,184,000 2,164,830 191,000 153,907 6,928 38,365 361,475 362,930 424,000 413,636 85,000 86,592 841,000 613,596 $ 0 -179,896 1,959,200 1,672,800 366,000 292,546 0 5,998 350,000 351,410 14-11 $ 0 96,718 0 12,902 00 0 5,607 0 63,716 185,000 178,516 550,000 447,699 975,000 746,149 150,000 124,026 170,000 122,351 106,000 95,295 180,000 159,354 1,347,000 1,551,162 $ 0 -18,714 1,861,000 1,904,092 318,000 412,636 02 400,000 385,879 $ 0 21,062 0 1,698 00 5,000 38,271 0 63,796 287,000 271,948 545,000 521,842 5,600,000 5,110,855 180,000 151,945 140,000 67,865 760,000 763,571 295,000 267,610 1,944,000 1,845,151 $ 0 2,104 1,500,000 1,656,264 0 16,375 00 400,000 416,656 $ 1,584,600 1,584,508 17,054,898 17,054,225 689,053 689,053 1,983,000 1,983,000 30,568,0008 30,476,7048 1,222,600 1,186,853 3,665,001 3,528,354 7,422,400 6,700,610 370,000 298,426 360,000 222,725 1,965,000 1,947,503 670,000 610,808 5,162,0009 4,903,4429 43,700,90010 43,492,87210 13,255,800 13,128,837 1,060,900 1,060,900 9,941,27811 9,941,27811 2,581,955 2,581,815 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 14-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) See Section Total Funds to in Text Project Funding FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 Sep. 30, 1981 22. Wood River New Work Drainage & Levee Approp. 0 0 0 225,000 14,854,82112 District, Ill. Cost 0 0 0 93,322 14,723,14412 26. Clarence Cannon New Work 36,090,000 18,450,000 23,123,000 20,950,000 234,987,02813 Dam and Reservoir, Approp. 36,864,666 30,932,991 23,758,152 19,196,644 237,504,28813 Salt River, Mo. Cost Maint. Approp. 560,160 655,000 1,228,500 917,000 3,499,460 Cost 533,028 633,023 1,032,809 1,080,977 3,413,498 1. Excludes $10,461 expended on previous project. 2. Excludes previous project cost of $1,416,620. 3. In addition $3,109 was expended for rehabilitation. 4. Excludes $2,828,200 for previous project. 5. Includes $7,797,326 for work authorized by Flood Control Act of 1965. 6. Includes $7,406,163 for work authorized by Flood Control Act of 1965. 7. Excludes $4,375,400 for previous project. 8. Includes $200,000 for definite project under 1938 Flood Control Act. 9. Excludes $6,800,700 for previous project. 10. Excludes $550,000 Area Development Administration Funds allotted to the State of Illinois for increased construction costs of Interstate Highway 57 to meet project requirements, and excludes $449,093 Area Redevelopment Administration Funds allotted to the Corps. 11. Includes $6,103,711 credit to State of Illinois for work in kind. 12. Funds are for work authorized by Flood Control Act of 1938. 13. Includes $216,628 for definite project study under 1938 Flood Control Act. 14-12 ST. LOUIS, MO., DISTRICT TABLE 14-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Oct. 23, 1962 Jun. 3, 1896 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 2, 19071 Mar. 3, 19051 Jun. 25, 1910 Jan. 21, 1927 Jul. 3, 1930 Mar. 2, 1945 Sep. 3, 19543 Jul. 3, 19584 Oct. 23, 1962 Jun. 22, 1936 Oct. 27, 1965 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 KASKASKIA RIVER, ILL. (See Section 2 of Text) Construct canal, lock, and dam to provide a 9-foot navigation channel from mouth to Fayetteville, Ill. MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN OHIO AND MISSOURI RIVERS (See Section 4 of Text) Project for regulating works in 1881. (To obtain a minimum depth of 8 feet.) Dredging introduced as part of the project. These acts practically abrogated that part of project for middle Mississippi which proposed regulating works. Regulating works restored to project and appropriations begun with a view to completion of improvement between Ohio and Missouri Rivers within 12 years at an estimated cost of $21 million, exclusive of amounts previously expended. For 9 feet deep and 300 feet wide from Ohio River to northern boundary of city of St. Louis. Project between northern boundary of St. Louis and Grafton (mouth of Illinois River) modified to provide a channel 9 feet deep and generally 200 feet wide with additional width around bends. Modified to provide construction of a lateral canal with lock at Chain of Rocks. Modified to provide construction of a small-boat harbor opposite Chester, Ill. Modified to provide construction of a fixed crest rockfill dam 900 feet below Chain of Rocks Bridge. COLUMBIA DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT NO. 3, ILL. (See Section 6 of Text) Construct pumping plants and other modifications to reduce interior flooding. EAST ST. LOUIS AND VICINITY, ILL. (See Section 7 of Text) Raise and enlarge existing levee. Construct pumping plant and other modifications to reduce interior flooding. ELDRED AND SPANKEY DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, ILL. (See Section 8 of Text) Raise and enlarge existing levee and other modifications. HARRISONVILLE LEVEE AND DRAINAGE DISTRICT, ILL. (See Section 9 of Text) Construct pumping plants and other modifications to reduce interior flooding. HARTWELL DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, ILL. (See Section 10 of Text) Raise and enlarge existing levee and other modifications. HILLVIEW DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, ILL. (See Section 11 of Text) Raise and enlarge existing levee and other modifications. 14-13 S. Doc. 44, 87th Cong., 1st sess. Annual Report, 1881, p. 1536. H. Doc. 50, 61st Cong., 1st sess., and H. Doc. 168, 58th Cong., 2d sess.2 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 9, 69th Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 12, 70th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 231, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 230, 83d Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 7, 85th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 543, 87th Cong., 2d sess. Special report on record in OCE. H. Doc. 329, 88th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 542, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess. REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 14-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Acts Work Authorized Documents Oct. 23, 1962 Jul. 3, 1958 Oct. 27, 1965 Jun. 28, 1938 Nov. 7, 1966 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 Nov. 7, 1966 Oct. 23, 1962 Adopted by Senate and House Committee resolutions, Oct. 12, 19725 KASKASKIA ISLAND DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, ILL. (See Section 12 of Text) Raise and enlarge existing levee. KASKASKIA RIVER, ILL. (See Section 13 of Text) Deletes Carlyle Reservoir and levees from New Athens to Carlyle from Upper Mississippi River Basin Plan and reauthorizes them as a part of the Kaskaskia River Plan. Construct dam at Shelbyville and six levee projects between Cowden and Vandalia and a local protection project at New Athens. Deleted requirement that local interests make a cash contribution to cost of levees between Cowden and Vandalia. Requires that local interests make a cash contribution equal to full cost of acquisition of flowage easements in those lands acquired by the United States which, upon completion of the levee in District No. 22, will not be required for construction, operation, and maintained of Carlyle Lake. MERAMEC RIVER BASIN, MO. (See Section 14 of Text) Construct reservoirs and local protection project. Construct Pine Ford, Irondale, and I-38 dams and 19 Angleruse sites. MCGEE CREEK DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, ILL. (See Section 15 of Text) Reconstruct existing levee and construct pumping plant to reduce flooding. MEREDOSIA, ILL., AND MEREDOSIA, WILLOW CREEK AND COON RUN DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICTS, ILL. (See Section 16 of Text) Raise and enlarge existing levee and other modifications MEREDOSIA LAKE AND WILLOW CREEK DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, ILL. (See Section 17 of Text) Raise and enlarge existing levee and other modifications. MISSISSIPPI RIVER AGRICULTURAL AREA 8, MO. (See Section 18 of Text) Raise and enlarge existing levee and alter pumping plant to reduce flooding. NUTWOOD DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, ILL. (See Section 19 of Text) Raise and enlarge existing levee and other modifications. PERRY COUNTY DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, & 3, MO. (See Section 20 of Text) Construct pumping plants and other modifications to reduce interior flooding. REND LAKE, BIG MUDDY RIVER, ILL. (See Section 21 of Text) Oct. 23, 1962 Construct dam at Benton, Ill., and subimpoundment dams on upper arms of reservoir. H. Doc. 519, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 232, 85th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 351, 88th Cong., 2d sess. Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 525, 89th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 510, 89th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 360, 92nd Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 541, 87th Cong., 2d sess. 14-14 ST. LOUIS, MO., DISTRICT TABLE 14-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Acts Work Authorized Documents WOOD RIVER DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, ILL. (See Section 22 of Text) Jun. 28, 1938 Construct reservoirs and local protection projects. Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. CLARENCE CANNON DAM AND RESERVOIR, SALT RIVER, MO. (See Section 26 of Text) Oct. 23, 1962 Modified act of 28 Jun. 1938 by deleting the reservoir therefrom H. Doc. 507, 87th Cong., and reauthorizing it as a separate multiple-purpose project. 2d sess. Oct. 27, 1965 Changes name of project from Joanna Dam to present Public Law 89-298, designation. 89th Cong. 1. Also joint resolution, Jun. 29, 1906. 4. All work completed. 2. Contains latest published map. 5. Authorized under provision of Sec. 201 of the Flood Control 3. Inactive. Act of 1965. TABLE 14-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 1981 Full Report Operation Mo. and Yr. Mo. and Yr. See Annual and Project Deauthorized Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed Cuivre River, Mo.' - 1883 $ 12,000 $ - Grafton Small Boat Harbor, Ill. Nov. 1977 19622 - Mississippi River at Alton, Ill. Small Boat Harbor Nov. 1977 19582 - Moccasin Springs, Mo. - 1969 76,4363 Small Boat Harbor opposite Chester, Ill. Nov. 1977 19542 - Small Boat Harbor opposite Hamburg, Ill. Nov. 1977 19502 - Wabash Railroad Bridges, Illinois River, Meredosia, and Valley City, Ill. - 1961 2,653,194 1961 1. Inactive. River declared nonnavigable by act of Mar. 23, 1900. 3. Excludes $56,605 contributed funds. 2. Year authorized. 14-15 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 14-D LAKES, LEVEES, AND RECREATIONAL FACILITIES Estimated See Required Total Estimated Section Estimated Non-Federal Cost (Date to in Text Project Name Federal Cost Cost Revision) 13. Kaskaskia River, Ill. Lakes: Carlyle' $ 42,819,400 $ 3,638,900 $ 46,458,300(1979) Shelbyville' 44,000,000 17,054,900 61,054,900 (1980) Levees: Village of New Athens' 2,230,000 134,000 2,354,000 (1979) District No. 21 (Vandalia District)2 13,600,000 2,420,000 16,020,000 (1977) District No. 23 (Dively District) s 1,720,000 100,000 1,820,000 (1976) District Nos 22, 27, 28, and 28A 3,620,000 450,000 4,070,000 (1963) (Cowden to Vandalia) 2'4 District Nos. 3, 4, 8, 10, and 13 7,590,000 853,000 8,443,000 (1959) (Carlyle to New Athens)3' 4 14. Meramec River Basin, Mo. Lakes: Meramec Park' 197,494,000 22,506,000 220,000,000 (1981) Union' 95,029,000 10,971,000 106,000,000 (1981) Pine Ford' 112,198,800 20,801,200 133,000,000 (1981) Irondale7 53,958,690 8,141,310 62,100,000 (1981) I-387 25,450,000 2,150,000 27,600,000 (1981) Recreation facilities: Angler-use sites7 2,040,000 2,040,000 4,080,000 (1981) 1. Separate reports are included herein. 6. Includes $2,714,400 for Highway 185 relocation and $141,200 2. Inactive. for Code 760 land acquisition funds. 3. See 1976 Annual Report for details. 7. See 1967 Annual Report for details. 4. Deauthorized, Sec. 12, PL93-251. 5. Local interests are required to reimburse the Federal Government over a period not to exceed 50 years. 14-16 ST. LOUIS, MO., DISTRICT TABLE 14-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD DAMAGE PREVENTION PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 1981 Full Report Operation Mo. and Yr. Mo. and Yr. See Annual and Project Deauthorized Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed Angler-use sites, Meramec Basin, Mo. Big Swan Drainage and Levee District, Illinois River, Ill.1 Cache River Diversion, Ill. Cape Girardeau, Mo., reaches Nos. 1, 3, and 4 Cape Girardeau, Mo., No. 2 Chouteau, Nameoki, and Venice Drainage and Levee District, Ill. Clear Creek Drainage and Levee District, 11.2 Degonia and Fountain Bluff Levee and Drainage District, Ill. Dively Drainage & Levee District, Ill. East Cape Girardeau and Clear Creek Drainage District, Ill. Eldrid, Ill Emergency bank protection for certain highway and railroad facilities at Price Landing, Mo. (see Flood Control Act of 1944) 4 Emergency repairs to levees on Mississippi, Illinois, and Kaskaskia Rivers and flood fighting and rescue work (Sec. 5, Flood Control Act of 1941, as amended)4 Emergency protection for certain highway and railroad facilities at Chester, Ill., bridge (Sec. 12, Flood Control Act of 1944) Emergency protection for Illinois approach, Chain of Rocks Bridge (Sec. 12, Flood Control Act of 1944) Fort Chartres and Ivy Landing Drainage District No. 5, Ill. Fort Chartres and Ivy Landing Drainage District No. 5 and Stringtown Drainage and Levee District No. 4, Ill. Grand Tower Drainage and Levee District, Ill. Indian Creek Area, Illinois River, Ill.1 Kaskaskia Island Drainage and Levee District, Ill. Keach Drainage and Levee District, Ill.' Levee Districts between Carlyle and New Athens, Ill., Nos. 2, 5, 6, and 7 Levee Districts between Carlyle and New Athens, Ill., Nos. 3, 4, 8, 10, and 13 Levee Districts between Cowden and Vandalia, Ill. Meredosia Lake and Willow Creek Drainage and Levee District, Ill. Miller Pond Drainage District, Ill. Mississippi River at St. Louis, Mo. Mississippi River Agricultural Area No. 10, Mo. Mississippi River Agricultural Area No. 12, Mo. Mississippi River, Alton to Gale, Ill., underseepage measures North Alexander Drainage and Levee District, Ill. Prairie du Pont Levee and Sanitary District, Ill.5 - 1967 $ - $ - Oct. 1978 Nov. 1979 Nov. 1979 Nov. 1979 Oct. 1978 Nov. 1979 -_ 1953 1959 1965 1955 1964 1959 1976 1963 19623 1950 1953 1952 1946 1970 1971 1959 1959 1979 1979 1978 1944 1955 1980 1967 1967 1957 1970 2,837,114 22,000 5,157,805 185,700 4,984,500 5,889,500 1,720,000 1,920,600 1953 1964 1955 1963 1959 1976 1963 55,415 Oct. 1949 1,033,279 50,000 1951 Jan. 1952 25,000 Aug. 1945 1,154,800 4,677,900 297,460 1958 1959 1949 496,000 249,738 164,183 79,265,166 85,422 939,569 6,005,127 1944 1955 Jan. 1980 Oct. 1962 1957 1970 14-17 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 14-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD DAMAGE (Continued) PREVENTION PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 1981 Full Report Operation Mo. and Yr. Mo. and Yr. See Annual and Project Deauthorized Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed Prairie du Rocher and vicinity, Ill. - 1959 3,882,600 - 1959 Preston Drainage and Levee District, Ill. - 1959 1,866,910 - 1959 Richland Creek, Ill. - 1969 401,000 - Riverland Levee District, Mo. Aug. 1977 19363 - - Scott County Drainage and Levee District, Illinois River, Ill.' Ste. Genevieve County Drainage and Levee District No. 1, Mo. Nov. 1977 19363 St. Louis County Drainage and Levee District No. 1, Mo. Nov. 1977 19363 - - Strington, Ft. Chartres and Ivy Landing, Ill. - 1957 2,123,700 - Aug. 1956 Union Lake, Mo.6 - 1979 4,917,359 - Urban areas at Alton, Ill. - 1960 192,000 - Valley City Drainage & Levee District, Ill. - 1967 91,952 - 1967 Wiedmer Chemical Drainage and Levee District, Mo. Nov. 1977 19363 1. Projects authorized or modified by Flood Control Actof Oct. 23, 5. Includes $5,235,927 for previous project. 1962 (see H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess., for details). 6. Includes $183,638 for definite project study under 1938 Flood 2. Completed except for seepage control measures, which are Control Act. Includes Highway 185 funds. inactive. 7. Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Sec. 205, 1948 Flood Control 3. Year authorized. Act, as amended). 4. Work complete, now performed under Public Law 99. 14-18 ST. LOUIS, MO., DISTRICT TABLE 14-F ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (96x3121) Federal Cost Totals by Item and CWIS Number FY 81 Categories SURVEYS (Category 100) Navigation (110) St. Louis Harbor, Mo. & Ill. -58330 $ 475,948 Miss. R. Mooring Facilities -81181 123,276 Sub-Total 599,224 Flood Damage Prevention Studies (120) Cape Girardeau-Jackson Metropolitan Area, Mo.-12053 162,792 Degognia & Fountain Bluff D&LD & Grand Tower D&LD, Ill. -52140 70,635 East Cape Giradeau, Clear Creek, etc. (Big Five) -35035 16,674 Plattin Creek, Mo. -12137 21,193 St. Louis Metropolitan Area, Mo. & Ill. -55040"' 2 693,573 Ste. Genevieve, Mo. -80061 25,035 Richland Creek, Ill. -12174 216,905 Sub-total 1,206,807 Special Studies (140) Great River Resource Mgmt Study -14028 562,282 Carlyle Lake - Shelbyville Lake, Ill. -12160 177,200 Sub-total 739,482 Coordination Studies with Other Agencies (180) Dept. Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service (181) -51840 119 Water Quality Management (184) -51860 234 Upper Miss. R. Basin Comm. (183) -50616 387 Planning Assistance to States (186) -51850 39 Sub-total 779 TOTAL (Category 100) $2,546,292 COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA (Category 200) Inspection and Inventory of Dams (236) -53843 and 53842 1,723,231 Flood Plain Management Services (250) 173,478 Transportation Systems (290) -53841 139 TOTAL (Category 200) $1,896,848 RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT (Category 300) None GRAND TOTAL GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS $4,443,140 1. St. Louis Metropolitan "Overflow Report" was forwarded to 2. St. Louis Metropolitan Maline Creek interim report to BERH Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors on Mar. 3, 1978, to OMB Mar. 13, 1981. Apr. 8, 80, to Sec'y of Army May 29, 80, to Congress Jun. 9, 80. 14-19 GALVESTON, TEX., DISTRICT* Galveston District comprises drainage basins of all short streams arising in coastal plain of Texas and flowing into the Gulf of Mexico, including the entire basin of Buffalo Bayou, San Jacinto, San Bernard, Lavaca, Navidad, Mission, and Aransas Rivers. It embraces Agua Dulce, San Fernando, and Olmos Creek Basins draining into Baffin Bay, and coastal area south thereof to the Rio Grande and east of western Boundary of Starr County, Texas. It includes lower basins of major streams flowing into the Gulf of Mexico: Sabine River, Texas and Louisiana, downstream from U.S. Highway 190 crossing at Bon Wier, Texas; Neches River downstream from Town Bluff gaging station; Trinity River downstream from Texas State Highway 19 crossing at Riverside, Texas; Brazos River downstream from confluence with Navasota River; Colorado River downstream from gaging station at Austin, Texas; Guadalupe River downstream from confluence with San Marcos River; San Antonio River downstream from confluence with Escondido Creek; Nueces River downstream from confluence with Frio and Atascosa Rivers. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Aquatic Plant Control (Southwestern Division) .................... 2. Brazos Island Harbor, Tex................ q Corpus Christi Ship Channel, Tex. ...... 4. Double Bayou, Tex .. ................... 5. Freeport Harbor, Tex...................... 6. Galveston Harbor and Channel, Tex...... 7. Gulf Intracoastal Water Between Apalachee Bay, Fla., and the Mexican B order ..................................... 8. Houston Ship Channel, Tex............ 9. Matagorda Ship Channel, Tex.......... 10. Neches River and Tributaries, Salt Water Barrier at Beaumont, Tex.............. 11. Sabine-Neches Waterway, Tex.......... 12. Texas City Channel, Tex............... 13. Trinity River and Tributaries, Tex....... 13A. Anahuac Channel, Tex................ 13B. Channel to Liberty, Tex............... 13C. Wallisville Lake, Tex.................. 14. Other Authorized Navigation Projects ..... 15. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ........................ Beach Erosion Control 16. Corpus Christi Beach, Tex. (Restoration Project) ....................... Page 15-2 15-2 15-2 15-3 15-3 15-4 15-4 15-6 15-6 15-6 15-7 15-7 15-8 15-8 15-8 15-8 15-9 15-9 Beach Erosion Control (cont) 17. Shoreline Erosion Control Work Under Special Authorization .............. Flood Control 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. Buffalo Bayou and Tributaries, Tex ...... Clear Creek, Tex . .......... ............... Freeport and Vicinity, Tex. Hurricane-Flood Protection ................ Highland Bayou, Tex...................... Port Arthur and Vicinity, Tex. Hurricane-Flood Protection ................ Taylors Bayou, Tex........................ Texas City and Vicinity, Tex. Hurricane-Flood Protection ................ Vince and Little Vince Bayous, Tex. ...... Inspection of Completed Flood Control Works ................... ........... Other Authorized Flood Control Projects .. Flood Control Work Under Special A uthorization ............ .................. Page 15-9 15-9 15-10 15-10 15-10 15-11 15-11 15-11 15-12 15-12 15-12 15-12 General Investigations Page 29. Surveys .................................... 15-12 15-9 30. Collection and Study of Basic Data ....... 15-12 *All cost and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 15-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 Navigation 1. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (SOUTHWESTERN DIVISION) 1965 ACT Location. Navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters in Texas and the Sabine River Watershed of Louisiana. Previous project. For details see page 699 of Annual Report for 1963. Existing project. A comprehensive project to provide for control and progressive eradication of water-hyacinth, alligatorweed, Eurasian watermilfoil, and other obnoxious aquatic plant growths, from navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters in Texas in the combined interest of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, public health, and related purposes, including continued research for development of the most effective and economic control measures. (See Table 15-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects paragraph for completed project authorized by 1958 and 1962 River and Harbor Acts.) (Also see Table 15-B for authorizing legislation.) Estimated cost for new work is: Federal (Corps) $2,019,000 and non-Federal $693,000. Local cooperation. Sec. 302, 1965 River and Harbor Act, applies. Non-Federal work contribution estimated at $693,000. Operations and results during fiscal year. Engineering and design and supervision and administration cost $110,109 and $7,236. Reimbursement to State for Government's share of cost of $28,360 for eradication was made. In addition, the State performed $11,392 of eradication for which credit as work-in-kind was given. Condition at end of fiscal year. Aquatic plant control work continued in the Nueces River Basin, North Coastal Area, Guadalupe River Basin, Sabine River Basin, Trinity River Basin, Cypress Creek Basin, Neches River Basin, South Coastal Area, San Jacinto River and Rio Grande Basins. Planning, to include hydrilla control in the existing program, is underway. 2. BRAZOS ISLAND HARBOR, TEX. Location. At extreme south end of coast of Texas, about 7 miles north of mouth of Rio Grande and about 5 miles east of Brownsville, Tex. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 11301.) Previous project. For details see page 1017 of Annual Report for 1932. Existing project. Provides for channel dimensions in various sections of the waterway as shown in Table 15F. Project also provides for dual jetties at the gulf entrance, a north jetty 6,330 feet long, a south jetty 5,092 feet long, and 1,000-foot extension to existing north jetty and for maintenance of 3rd fishing harbor constructed by local interests. Under ordinary conditions, mean tidal range is about 1.5 feet, and extreme range is about 2 feet. All depths refer to mean low tide. To some extent, height of tides is dependent on the wind, and during strong "northers" in winter season, water surface in southern end of Laguna Madre may be raised 4 feet or more above mean low tide in the gulf. (See Table 15-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Complied with. Terminal facilities. Numerous terminal facilities for bulk and liquid cargo are available. (See Port Series No. 26, revised 1980). Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design and supervision and administration cost $28,443 and $63,092. Condition and operation studies and real estate activities cost $55,118. In addition, $30,000 was returned to local sponsor and $133,038 was given to local sponsor for prior year diking expenses on Brownsville Channel. (See Table 15-H for dredging operations.) Condition at end of fiscal year. Widening Brownsville Channel from Goose Island to Brownsville turning basin and deepening southeast corner of Brownsville turning basin to 36 feet was completed in April 1980. The 1,000- foot extension to existing north jetty was placed in the inactive category in 1980. (See Table 15-E for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1981.) 3. CORPUS CHRISTI SHIP CHANNEL, TEX. Location. This project, formerly known as the Port Aransas-Corpus Christi Waterway, Tex., was changed to Corpus Christi Ship Channel, Tex. by 1968 River and Harbor Act. This is a consolidation of old improvements of Port Aransas, Tex., and channel from Aransas Pass to Corpus Christi, Tex. Aransas Pass is on southern portion of Texas Coast, 180 miles southwest of Galveston and 132 miles north of mouth of Rio Grande. Aransas Pass connects Corpus Christi Bay and Aransas Bay with the gulf. Waterway extends from deep water in the gulf through Aransas Pass jettied entrance, thence westerly 20.75 miles to and including a turning basin at Corpus Christi, thence westerly 1.75 miles through Industrial Canal to and including turning basin at Avery Point, thence westerly 4.25 miles to and including a turning basin near Tule Lake, thence northwesterly 1.8 miles to and including a turning basin at Viola, Tex. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 11308, 11309, 11311, and 11314.) Previous project. For details see page 1861 of Annual Report for 1915. Existing project. (See Table 15-F for existing project dimensions provided for in various channels and basins comprising this waterway). Project also provides for two rubblestone jetties at Aransas Pass entrance, extending into the gulf from St. Joseph and Mustang Islands, project lengths of which are 11,190 and 8,610 feet, respectively. Project further provides for a stone dike on St. Joseph Island about 20,991 feet long, connecting with north jetty and extending up this island to prevent a channel being cut around jetty. Project also provides for a breakwater at the entrance to the harbor area at Port Aransas, and for the realignment of the existing 12-foot by 100-foot project channel to Port Aransas. The breakwater consists of two overlapping sections. The one on the east side of the realigned entrance channel has a length of 830 feet and the second, located on the west side of the entrance channel, has a length of 1,290 feet. The channel to Port Aransas was relocated in the 300-foot clear distance between the overlapping sections. The portion of the channel remaining inside the breakwaters was widened to 150 feet. Under ordinary conditions, mean tidal range at Aransas 15-2 GALVESTON, TEX., DISTRICT Pass is about 1.1 feet and extreme range about 2 feet, and at Corpus Christi mean range about 1 foot and extreme about 1.5 feet. Heights of tides are dependent largely on strength and directions of winds, and during strong "northers" in the winter season water surface may be depressed as much as 3 feet below mean low tide. Estimated cost for new work is: Federal (Corps) $92,824,515, including $456,515 for Port Aransas Breakwaters and exclusive of amount expended on previous projects; and non-Federal $20,719,068 (includes $768 for Port Aransas Breakwaters) including $8,810,840 contributed funds and value of useful work performed, $620,228 lands, $9,303,000 relocations and $1,985,000 other cost. (See Table 15-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with except for provisions of Sec. 101 of 1968 River and Harbor Act and Sec. 124 of Water Resources Development Act of 1976. Non-Federal contributions estimated at $8,810,840. Terminal facilities. Terminal facilities on Harbor Island at head of Aransas Pass, Ingleside, Corpus Christi, La Quinta, Avery Point, and Viola, are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series, No. 25, revised 1979, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Engineering and design and supervision and administration for the 45-foot project cost $874,948 and $72,208, respectively. Maintenance: Engineering and design and supervision and administration cost $36,757 and $170,121, respectively. Conditions and operation studies and real estate activities cost $134,417. Construction of levees for Tule Lake Disposal Area cost $25,527.(See Table 15-H for dredging operations.) Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is about 60 percent complete exclusive of inactive portions. The Port Aransas-Corpus Christi 40-foot project was initiated in 1963 and completed in 1966. The Jewel Fulton Canal was initiated in 1962 and completed in 1963. The Port Aransas Breakwaters were completed in July 1973. The work remaining consists of deepening deep-draft channels to 45 feet from Beacon 82 through Viola Turning Basin; widening of channels and basins; and constructing a mooring area at Port Ingleside with dolphins. Entrance and jetty channels have been dredged to project depth and width, and dredging of channel from Harbor Island to Beacon 82 at 45-foot depth has been completed. Construction of initial mooring dolphins was completed in May 1979. (See Table 15-E for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1981.) 4. DOUBLE BAYOU, TEX. Location. Existing project dimensions for waterway are shown in Table 15-F. (Also see Table 15-B authorizing legislation.) Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is about 0.5 feet and extreme range is about 1.2 feet. Height of tides is dependent largely on winds, and during strong north winds in the winter season, water surface may be depressed 1.5 feet below mean low tide. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 11326.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Facilities are privately owned. At the mouth of the bayou is a timber wharf for loading oil barges. Between miles 1 and 1.5 above the mouth are timber wharf, a boat slip, and a marine railway owned by the Brown and Root Corporation. At mile 3 above the mouth is a small depot for handling oystershell. The facility consists of a timber bulkhead and hoppers for loading trucks. One half mile above the mouth are several fishing vessel docks. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design and supervision and administration cost $8,283 and $25,718, respectively. Condition and operation studies cost $2,970. (See Table 15- H for dredging operations.) Condition at end of fiscal year. The 6-foot project was completed in 1941. The 7-foot project was completed in 1971. 5. FREEPORT HARBOR, TEX. Location. Formed by improvement of Brazos River, Tex., from mouth to about 6 miles upstream to Freeport, Tex. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 11321 and 11322.) Previous projects. For details see page 1860 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 872 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Existing project dimensions for various channels and basins are shown in Table 15-F on channel dimensions at end of chapter. (See also Table 15- B authorizing legislation.) Existing project also provides for: Dual jetties and a diversion canal for the Brazos River, including a dam, a lock in the dam and necessary auxiliary equipment. Also provides for rehabilitation of southwest jetty and the relocation of the northeast jetty (about 640 feet to the northeast); realignment of the channel between the Jetty Channel and Brazosport Turning Basin; realignment of the channel between Brazosport Turning Basin and Upper Turning Basin; relocation of Upper Turning Basin; and public use facilities adjacent to the Freeport Jetties. The 30-foot channel from Upper Turning Basin to Stauffer Chemical Plant, including the turning basin, was deauthorized by Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. Construction of lock in diversion dam at local expense is considered inactive. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is about 1.5 feet and extreme range is about 2.5 feet. Except under extreme conditions, rises on river and in diversion channel do not cause greater variations in water surface than those caused by tidal action. Estimated cost of new work is: $70,427,000 Federal (Corps); and $9,491,000 non- Federal, including $1,059,303 contributed funds, $360,249 contributed work, $5,382,448 lands, $2,242,000 levees and spillways, and $447,000 relocations. Local cooperation. Fully complied with except for Section 101 of River and Harbor Act of 1970. River and Harbor Act of 1970- requires local interests provide necessary lands, easements, and rights-of-way required for public use facilities; and when the appraised value of land, easements, and rights-of-way amounts to less than 50 percent of the total first cost of the development, make additional contributions sufficient to bring the non- Federal share to at least that level. The cash contribution is presently estimated at $301,000 which combined with land, estimated $584,000 is 50 percent of the cost of public use facilities. Cash contribution at time of authorization estimated at $95,000 in addition to providing land estimated at $70,000. Total contribution estimated at $1,419,552. Terminal facilities. Small privately owned wharves, two oil docks, one acid dock, two shell unloading docks and 15-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 one caustic dock. Brazos River Navigation District has one large dock with four transit sheds over rail facilities permitting all-weather work. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 26, revised 1980, for additional facilities.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Preconstruction planning was continued on the 45-foot project at a cost of $44,816. Maintenance: Engineering and design and supervision and administration cost $14,664 and $27,325. Condition and operation studies, real estate activities, and inspections and reports cost $35,711. Miscellaneous maintenance by hired labor totaled $657. Adjustment in prior year hopper dredge cost was $741,806. (See Table 15-H for dredging operations.) Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project is 6 percent complete. Work remaining consists of realigning, deepening and widening the Outer Bar and Jetty Channels; relocating the northeast jetty; rehabilitating the southwest jetty; realigning and deepening the harbor channel between the jetty channel and the Upper Turning Basin; relocating and enlarging the Upper Turning Basin; constructing a turning point near the northwesterly end of the jetty channel; enlarging Brazosport Turning Basin; deepening Brazos Harbor Channel; and enlarging and deepening Brazos Harbor Turning Basin. Preconstruction planning on this remaining work is complete except for archeological investigations which are underway. The 38- 36 foot project was initiated in 1961 and completed in 1962. (See Table 15-E for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1981.) 6. GALVESTON HARBOR AND CHANNEL, TEX. Location. A consolidation of authorized improvements at Galveston, Tex., which includes projects formerly identified as Galveston Harbor, Texas; Galveston Channel, Tex.; and Galveston seawall extension. Entrance to Galveston Harbor is on Gulf of Mexico on the northern portion of the Texas Coast. Galveston Channel extends from a point in Galveston Harbor between Bolivar Peninsula and Fort Point to and along wharf front of Galveston, Tex., and is about 5 miles long and 1,200 feet wide. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 11324/5.) Previous projects. For details see page 1854 of Annual Report for 1915. Existing project. Provides for channel dimensions in sections of the waterway shown in Table 15-F. (Also see Table 15-B for authorizing legislation.) Also provided are: two rubble-mound jetties, the south one extending from Galveston Island and the north one extending from Bolivar Peninsula, for distances of 35,900 feet and 25,907 feet, respectively, into the Gulf of Mexico; a concrete seawall from the angle at Sixth Street and Broadway, in the city of Galveston, to the south jetty, and a 16,300-foot extension of the concrete seawall in a southwesterly direction from 61st Street; for 11 groins along the gulf shore between 12th Street and 61st Street; and for maintenance of seawall from the angle at 6th Street and Broadway to the south jetty. Under ordinary conditions, mean tidal range in Galveston Harbor is 1.6 feet on outer bar and 1.4 feet on inner bar with extreme ranges of 2.3 and 2.1 feet, respectively. Mean tidal range in Galveston channel is about 1.3 feet and extreme range about 2 feet under ordinary conditions. Height of tides in both Galveston harbor and channel is dependent largely on the wind, and during strong "northers" water surface may be depressed 2 feet below mean low tide. Local cooperation. Complied with. Terminal facilities. None on Galveston Harbor, which is entrance channel leading to terminal facilities on Galveston, Texas City, and Houston Ship Channels. Galveston Channel terminal facilities are mostly on south side of channel. Principal wharves, owned by the city of Galveston, extend from 10th to 41st Street (see Port Series No. 23, revised 1979). A containership terminal equipped with a crane capable of stacking containers three units high on the deck of any normal containership has been completed and placed into operation by the city of Galveston at Piers 10 and 11, on the south side of Galveston Channel. The city of Galveston has also placed into operation a barge terminal equipped with two 35-ton and one 5-ton cranes for loading and unloading barges on Lash and Seabee ships at Pier 35 and a docking and holding area for Lash and Seabee barges on Pelican Island, directly across the channel from Piers 35 and 36. Present facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design and supervision and administration cost $85,168 and $103,671. Condition and operation studies, inspections and reports, and real estate activities, cost $90,186. Miscellaneous maintenance totaled $52,936. Settlement of a claim on contract completed in prior year cost $89,483. Mobilization on contract for dredging Bolivar Roads to Pier "B" cost $500,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project is complete. Dredging of Galveston channel to 36 foot depth was completed in November 1966. Dredging of the realigned entrance and Outer Bar Channel was completed in October 1967. Rehabilitation of the Beach Front Groins was completed June 1, 1970. Dredging of Galveston channel to 40 feet was completed in March 1976. (See Table 15-E for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1981.) 7. GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN APALACHEE BAY, FLA., AND MEXICAN BORDER (GALVESTON DIST.) Location. Extends from a point on Sabine River about 3 miles below Orange, Tex., to Brownsville, Tex., about 421 miles; a navigation channel, about 7 miles long, in Colorado River, extending from Matagorda, Tex., to Gulf of Mexico; a tributary channel in San Bernard River, extending from Intracoastal Waterway crossing to State highway bridge some 30 miles above crossing; a tributary channel in Colorado River extending from Intracoastal Waterway upstream 15.5 miles; a tributary channel extending about 14 miles from Intracoastal Waterway to Palacios, Tex.; a tributary channel extending about 2 miles from Intracoastal Waterway to Rockport, Tex.; a tributary channel extending about 6 miles from Intracoastal Waterway near Port Aransas, Tex., to town of Aransas Pass, Tex.; a tributary channel about onefourth mile long extending from Intracoastal Waterway near Port O'Connor, Tex., into Barroom Bay; a tributary channel extending about 38.8 miles from Intracoastal Waterway via Seadrift to a point in Guadalupe River 5.5 miles below Victoria, Tex.; a harbor of refuge for small 15-4 GALVESTON, TEX., DISTRICT craft at Seadrift; a channel extending from gulf to Port Mansfield, Tex., about 11 miles; and a tributary channel in Arroyo Colorado extending from Intracoastal Waterway to a point near Harlingen, Tex., about 31 miles; side channels in vicinity of Port Isabel, Tex., and a small boat basin at Port Isabel, Tex., and a tributary channel extending from Intracoastal Waterway main channel at a point in West Galveston Bay into Offatts Bayou about 2.2 miles with a west turnout (wye connection) 12 feet deep and 125 feet between Offatts Bayou Channel and the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 11302, 11303, 11305, 11306, 11308, 11309, 11314, 11315, 11317, 11319, 11322, 11326, and 11331.) Previous project. For details see page 1859 of Annual Report for 1915. (West Galveston Bay and Brazos River Canal, Tex.) Existing project. Existing project dimensions provided for in main channel of waterway: A channel 12 feet deep (below mean low tide) and 125 feet wide from the Sabine River to Brownsville, Texas. Relocation of channel 12 feet deep by 125 feet wide in Matagorda Bay, miles 454.3 to 471.3, relocation of channel 12 feet deep by 125 feet wide in Corpus Christi Bay, miles 539.4 to 549.7 (mileage is west of Harvey Lock Louisiana); and alternate channel, 12 feet deep (below mean low tide) and 125 feet wide via Galveston Channel and Galveston Bay to the Galveston causeway; maintenance of existing channel 12 feet deep by 125 feet wide through Lydia Ann Channel, between Aransas Bay and Aransas Pass; provisions of such passing places, widening of bends, locks and guard locks, Railway bridges over artificial cuts as are necessary, and the tributary channels shown in tabulation. The authorized channel 16 feet deep and 125 feet wide from Sabine River to Houston Ship Channel and the 9 feet deep and 100 feet wide channel from mile 8.2 to mile 13.2 in Chocolate Bayou are inactive. (See Table 15-G on existing project dimensions provided for in tributary channels; also Table 15-B on authorizing legislation.) Mean tidal variation is 0.5 foot at Orange, 1 foot at Port Arthur, 1.3 feet in Galveston Bay, 1.5 feet at Freeport, 1 foot in Matagorda Bay, 1 foot in San Antonio Bay, 1 foot at Corpus Christi, 1.5 feet at Port Isabel, and 1.5 feet at Brownsville. Extreme ranges of tide under ordinary conditions are 1 foot at Orange, 1.5 feet at Port Arthur, 2 feet in Galveston Bay, 2 feet at Freeport, 1.5 feet in Matagorda and San Antonio Bays, 1.5 feet at Corpus Christi, 2 feet at Port Isabel, and 1.5 feet at Brownsville. Height of tides is dependent largely on wind. Strong north winds have depressed water surface as much as 2 feet below mean low tide. Estimated cost for new work is: $70,465,000, Federal (Corps), including $8,414 for Port Isabel Side Channel, $46,559 for Port Isabel Small Boat Basin, $356,466 for Offatts Bayou, and $658,573 for Channel to Aransas Pass and excluding expenditures on previous projects; non-Federal $16,651,174 ($395,000 voluntarily expended on Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, $46,559 contributed funds for Port Isabel, $49,665 contributed funds for Offatts Bayou, $347,950 contributed funds for channel to Aransas Pass, $2,627,000 contributed funds for Mouth of Colorado River, $5,773,000 lands for Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, $11,000 lands for Port Isabel, $4,242,000 relocations for Gulf Intracoastal Waterway and $3,159,000 other costs Gulf Intracoastal Waterway). Local cooperation. Fully complied with except for inactive portions, and provisions of section 101, 1968 River and Harbor Act. Non-Federal contributions are $395,000 for Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, $46,559 for Port Isabel, Tex., $49,665 for Offatts Bayou, Tex., $347,950 for Channel to Aransas Pass, Tex., and $2,627,000 for Mouth of Colorado River, Tex. Terminal facilities. There are terminal facilities at Aransas Pass, Port Arthur, Galveston, Port Isabel, and Brownsville. See Port Series No. 22 (revised 1981), Port Series No. 23 (revised 1979), Port Series No. 25 (revised 1979) and Port Series No. 26 (revised 1980), Corps of Engineers. Local interests constructed terminal facilities at Port Mansfield and Port Harlingen. There are numerous privately owned piers and wharves along the waterway. A 330-foot navigation district owned general cargo dock, a 770-foot private dock and a 760-foot private timber trestle have recently been completed at the upper end of the Channel to Victoria. Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design and supervision and administration cost $138,807 and $71,934, respectively, on Chocolate Bayou. Dredging of Chocolate Bayou channel cost $654,815. Construction of a saltwater barrier in Chocolate Bayou channel cost $216,336. Planning continued on Mouth of Colorado River at a cost of $246,023. Maintenance: The Brazos River Floodgates and the Colorado River Locks were operated and maintained at a cost of $355,530 and $363,824. Engineering and design for the above structures cost $90,184 and $94,575. Supervision and administration for the above structures cost $210,074 and $138,343. Repair of damages to the Colorado River Locks cost $27,512. Conditions and operation studies, inspections and reports, real estate activities, and water control management on the Main Channel and Tributaries cost $509,878. Engineering and design and supervision and administration for the Main Channel and Tributaries cost $261,522 and $959,323. Repairs by hired labor to levee slopes and drainage structures along the Channel to Victoria totaled $15,081. Cost for dredging contracts physically completed in prior years and financially completed in Fiscal Year 1981 was (-) $6,555. Directional signs and channel reference lines were repaired by hired labor at a cost of $7,893. Construction of levees cost $40,832. Repair of gate hinges at Colorado River Locks cost $13,500. Mooring facilities at Brazos River Floodgates cost $408,000. Repairs to boat house at Colorado River Locks cost $6,350. Marsh habitat on Stedman Island cost $63,345. Rehabilitation of sector gates at Brazos River Floodgates cost $167,405. Erosion repairs at critical areas on Channel to Victoria cost $466,190. Claims receivable from barge owners for damages to Brazos River Floodgates were $87,964 and Colorado River Locks were $4,620. $3,947 was returned to local sponsor and $33,309 was given to local sponsor for prior year diking expenses on Channel to Rockport. (See Table 15-H for dredging operations.) Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project is about 75 percent complete, exclusive of inactive portions. Removal of the railroad bridge across the canal at Mud Bayou was completed and operation and care of the facility was discontinued on April 14, 1969. Deepening the existing 6 foot by 60 foot side channels at Port Isabel to 12 feet was completed February 22, 1972, Offatts Bayou channel was completed January 1974. Relocation of main channel across Corpus Christi Bay was completed in September 1976. The 14 foot by 175 foot Channel to Aransas Pass was completed in April 1979. Dredging Chocolate Bayou Channel was initiated in December 1979 15-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 and completed in January 1981. Construction of a saltwater barrier in Chocolate Bayou was initiated in March 1980 and completed in February 1981. The 12 foot by 125 foot channel relocation route in Matagorda Bay has been placed in the inactive category. The Harbor of Refuge at Seadrift, Texas, has been placed in the inactive category. Active authorized work remaining consists of the following: construction of jetties at mouth of Colorado River; dredging a navigation channel from gulf to the GIWW; constructing a turning basin at Matagorda, Tex; construction of a diversion dam and channel; construction of an oyster cultch; and recreation facilities. (See Table 15- E for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1981.) 8. HOUSTON SHIP CHANNEL, TEX. Location. Connects Galveston Harbor, at a point opposite Port Bolivar, with city of Houston, Tex., extending 50 miles northwesterly across Galveston Bay through San Jacinto River and Buffalo Bayou to a turning basin at head of Long Reach with light-draft channel 7 miles long from turning basin to Main Street, Houston. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 11324/5, 11327, 11328, and 11329.) Previous project. For details see page 1856 of Annual Report for 1915. Existing project. Provides for construction of certain cut-offs, for easing sharp bends, for construction of an earthen dam across the upper end of Turkey Bend, for the construction of 26,000 lineal feet of pile dike to protect the channel in upper Galveston Bay (which was deauthorized by Sec. 12 of PL 93-251), for construction of such offchannel silting basins as deemed necessary by the Chief of Engineers, and for dimensions in various channels and basins of the Waterways. (See Table 15-B for authorizing legislation.) Mean tidal range under ordinary conditions is 0.6 foot to 1.3 feet in lower part of Galveston Bay; 0.6 foot to 1.3 feet in upper bay; and 0.5 to 1 foot in San Jacinto River and Buffalo Bayou. Extreme ranges under ordinary conditions are about 2 feet, 1.2 feet, and 1 foot respectively. Freshets caused rises of over 12 feet in Buffalo Bayou; however, this condition has not occurred since completion of Addicks and Barker Dams for Flood control on upper watershed of Buffalo Bayou. Height of tides is dependent largely on the wind, and during strong "northers" in winter season the water surface may be depressed 2 feet below mean low tide. Local cooperation. Complied with except for inactive portions of Greens Bayou. Terminal facilities. City of Houston and Port of Houston Authority operate modern terminals which supplement privately owned wharves, piers, and docks, as described in Port Series No. 24 (revised 1980), Corps of Engineers. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design (including model studies) and supervision and administration cost $50,467 and $278,277. Condition and operation studies, inspections and reports, and real estate activities cost $167,137. Miscellaneous maintenance by hired labor was $9,928. Dredge disposal areas were sprayed for mosquito control at a cost of $58,449. $1,900 was returned to local sponsor for prior year diking expenses on Houston Ship Channel, Sims Bayou to and including turning basin. (See Table 15-H for dredging operations.) Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project is complete, exclusive of inactive portion of Greens Bayou. The 40-foot project was completed in March 1966. Dredging a channel in Greens Bayou was completed October 1970. (See Table 15-E for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1981.) 9. MATAGORDA SHIP CHANNEL, TEX. Location. This is a consolidation of shallow draft channel improvements of "Channel from Pass Cavallo to Port Lavaca, Tex.," and deep draft channel improvements authorized under "Matagorda Ship Channel, Tex." Bar at Pass Cavallo is 125 miles southwest of Galveston entrance and 54 miles north of Aransas Pass. It connects Matagorda Bay with the gulf. Project extends across Matagorda Bay and Lavaca Bay to towns of Port Lavaca and Point Comfort. These two towns are on opposite sides of Lavaca Bay and both are about 26 miles northwest from Pass Cavallo. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 11316.) Existing project. Existing project dimensions provided for in various channels and basins are listed in Table 15-F on channel dimensions. (Also see Table 15-B for authorizing legislation.) Project also provides for dual jetties at entrance, south jetty extending 6,000 feet to 24-foot depth in the gulf and north jetty extending 5,900 feet to 24-foot depth. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is about 1 foot and extreme range about 2 feet. Height of tide is dependent largely on the wind, and during strong "northers" in winter season the water surface may be depressed 2 feet below mean low tide. Estimated cost for new work is: $18,058,777 Federal (Corps), and $12,859,000 non-Federal, including $12,259,619 contributed funds, $182,000 for lands, $220,000 for relocations, and $196,581 other costs. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests have contributed $12,259,619. Terminal facilities. Privately owned facilities at Port Lavaca, municipally owned facilities at mouth of Lynn bayou, privately owned and publicly owned facilities at Point Comfort, Tex. These facilities are considered adequate for present commerce. Facilities at Point Comfort consist of a channel, turning basin with wharfs, oil dock and loading equipment, all owned by Aluminum Company of America; and a wharf built by local interest at Point Comfort turning basin. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design and supervision and administration cost $18,023 and $67,326. Condition and operation studies cost $48,773. Miscellaneous maintenance totaled $153. (See Table 15-H for dredging operations.) Condition at the end of fiscal year. The project is complete. The 36-foot project was initiated in 1962 and completed in March 1967. 10. NECHES RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, SALT WATER BARRIER AT BEAUMONT, TEX. Location. The project would be located on Neches River at Beaumont, Texas, in Jefferson and Orange Counties on the upper coast of Texas. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 11343.) Existing project. The project will provide a gated salt water barrier in the Neches River at Beaumont consisting of seven 40 x 24.5 foot tainter gates; a gated navigation by-pass channel with a clear opening of 56 feet and a 15-6 GALVESTON, TEX., DISTRICT depth of 16 feet; an access road and levee; and an auxiliary dam across a canal which drains an adjacent bayou. Estimated cost for new work is: $29,700,000 Federal (Corps) and non-Federal $2,100,000, consisting of $2,010,000 cash arid $90,000 for lands. In addition, non- Federal private cost is estimated at $5,795,000. (See Table 15-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Sec. 102, 1976 Water Resources Development Act applies. Local cash contribution estimated at $2,010,000. Terminal facilities. None. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning was continued at a cost of $378,091. Condition at end of fiscal year. Preconstruction planning is in progress. 11. SABINE-NECHES WATERWAY, TEX. Location. This is a consolidation of old improvements of "Harbor at Sabine Pass and Port Arthur Canal" and "Sabine-Neches Canal, including Sabine River to Orange and Neches River to Beaumont, Tex." Sabine Pass is on Gulf of Mexico about 58 miles east of Galveston and 280 miles west of Southwest Pass, Mississippi River. It connects Sabine Lake with gulf. Port Arthur canal extends 7 miles from near upper end of Sabine Pass to Port Arthur docks at mouth of Taylors Bayou. Near its upper end, Sabine-Neches canal joins and extends to mouths of Neches and Sabine Rivers. Waterway next extends up Neches River to Beaumont and up Sabine River to Orange. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 11341, 11342, and 11343.) Previous projects. For details see page 1863 of Annual Report for 1915, page 985 of Annual Report for 1916, and page 873 of Annual Report for 1926. Existing project. Existing project dimensions provided for in various channels and basins are set forth in Table 15-F on channel dimensions. (Also see Table 15-B for authorizing legislation.) Project also provides for two stone jetties at Sabine Pass entrance from the gulf, western jetty to be 21,905 feet long and eastern jetty 25,310 feet long. Project further provides for removal of guard lock in Sabine-Neches Canal, construction of suitable permanent protective works along Sabine Lake frontage owned by city of Port Arthur to prevent dredged material from entering Sabine Lake and to prevent erosion of material deposited, reconstruction of Port Arthur Bridge, and relc ation of Port Arthur field office. Mean tidal variatior at entrance is about 1.5 feet, at Port Arthur about 1 foot, and at Orange and Beaumont about 0.5 foot. Prolonged north winds during winter season have depressed water surface as much as 3.4 feet below mean low tide while tropical disturbances have caused heights as much as 8 feet above mean low tide. Local cooperation. Complied with except for inactive portions. Terminal facilities. See volume 2, Port Series No. 22 (revised 1969), Corps of Engineers. There are 3 wharves and piers in addition to the facilities included in the referenced Port Series. Facilities are considered adequate for present commerce. Operation and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design and supervision and administration cost $17,261 and $278,966. Condition and operation studies, water control management, and real estate activities cost $88,397. Miscellaneous maintenance totaled $47,965. (See Table 15-H for dredging operations.) Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project is complete except for inactive portions. Removal of obstructive bridge at Port Arthur was completed May 28, 1969. The high level fixed bridge across Sabine-Neches Canal was completed October 9, 1970. Deepening project to 40 feet was completed on April 10, 1972. (See Table 15-E for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1981.) 12. TEXAS CITY CHANNEL, TEX. Location. Texas City is on the mainland of Texas on west side of Galveston Bay, about 10 miles northwest of city of Galveston. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 11324/5.) Previous projects. For details see page 1856 of Annual Report for 1915. Existing project. Existing project dimensions provided for in various channels and basins are set forth in Table 15-F on channel dimensions. (Also see Table 15-B for authorizing legislation.) Project also provides for easing the approach to the turning basin; a pile dike 28,200 feet long, parallel to and north of the channel; and a rubble-mound dike, 27,600 feet long, along the southerly side of the pile dike. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is about 1.3 feet and extreme range is about 2 feet. Height of tide is dependent largely on the wind and during strong "northers" water surface may be depressed 2 feet below mean low tide. Estimated cost for new work is Federal (Corps) $15,001,000, excluding expenditures on previous projects, and non-Federal $1,793,700, including $127,741 contributed funds, $248,000 work contribution, $427,959 lands, $984,000 levees and spillways and $6,000 for removal of barge mooring facilities from Snake Island. Local cooperation. Fully complied with, except for Section 201 of Flood Control Act of 1965 and H. D. 92-199. Non-Federal contributions $375,741. Terminal facilities. Privately owned terminal facilities are on the mainland at inner end of this channel and are considered adequate for existing commerce. A deep-draft canal and turning basin extending about 1.9 miles southwestward from south end of Texas City Turning Basin have been constructed by local interests. See Port Series No. 23 (revised 1979), Corps of Engineers. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Engineering and design and supervision and administration cost $160,814 and $69,944, respectively. Contract for dredging Texas City Industrial Canal and turning basin, and construction of levees cost $6,114,531. Maintenance: Engineering and design and supervision and administration cost $6,176 and $61,795. Condition and operation studies cost $9,500. Mobilization on contract for dredging from GIWW to the turning basin cost $300,000. (See Table 15-H for dredging operations.) Condition at end of fiscal year. The 40-foot channel was completed in June 1967. Widening the Texas City Turning Basin from 1,000 feet to 1,200 feet; realigning the Texas City Turning Basin to a location 85 feet easterly from its present position; and enlargement through widening and deepening to 40 feet of the Industrial Canal and basins was initiated in July 1980. (See Table 15-E for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1981.) 15-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 13. TRINITY RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, TEX. Location. The main stem of the Trinity River is formed at Dallas by the confluence of the West Fork and the Elm Fork at river mile 505.5. The mouth of the Trinity is about one-half mile west of Anahuac, Texas. (See Geological Survey base map, Texas, scale 1:500,000.) Previous project. For details of abandoned locks and dam construction see page 986 of Annual Report for 1932. Existing project. See individual detailed reports on Anahuac Channel, Channel to Liberty and Wallisville Lake. Project includes the existing Federal project designated as "Mouth of Trinity River, Texas," which was completed in 1907 at a cost of $80,000 (no cost to local interest). Project is not being maintained. (See Table 15-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. See individual detailed reports on Channel to Liberty and Wallisville Lake. There is no local cooperation required for Anahuac Channel. Terminal facilities. Privately owned wharves and piers at Anahuac, Moss Bluff, Wallisville, and Liberty, Texas, are adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal yaer. New Work: Not applicable. Condition at end of fiscal year. The restudy of the navigation benefits is complete. (See Table 15-E for total cost of existing project to 30 September 1981.) 13A. ANAHUAC CHANNEL, TEX. Location. Extends from 6-foot depth in Galveston Bay to Anahuac, Tex., opposite mouth of Trinity River 38 miles north of Galveston, Tex. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 11323.) Existing project. No project dimensions authorized by 1905 River and Harbor Act. A 6- by 80-foot channel, 16,000 feet long was dredged in 1905. At present a 6- by 100-foot channel is maintained. Under ordinary conditions tidal range is 0.6 to 1.2 feet. Height of tide is dependent largely on wind. Strong north winds depress water surface 1.5 feet below mean sea level. Latest published map is in House Document 440, 56th Congress, 1st session. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Privately owned wharves and piers are the only terminal facilities at Anahuac. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design and supervision and administration cost $1,200 and $600. Condition and operation studies, inspections and reports, cost $3,140. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was completed in 1911. 13B. CHANNEL TO LIBERTY, TEX. Location. Improvement is located in Galveston Bay and tidal reach of lower Trinity River. (See Geological Survey Maps for Anahuac, Cove, Moss Bluff, and Liberty, Texas.) Previous projects. For details see page 986 of Annual Report for 1932. Existing project. Provides for a 6-foot channel from Anahuac to Liberty which was completed in 1925. A navigable channel from the Houston Ship Channel near Red Fish Bar in Galveston Bay to Liberty, Texas, with depth of 9 feet and width of 150 feet, extending along the east shore of Trinity Bay to the mouth of the Trinity River at Anahuac, thence in the river channel to a turning basin at Liberty, Texas, and a protective embankment along the west side of the channel in Trinity Bay. (See Table 15-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for portion of "Channel to Liberty" between Houston Ship Channel and 1 mile below Anahuac, Texas, as required by 1946 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 634, 79th Cong., 2nd sess.), but not complied with for remaining portion of "Channel to Liberty" as required by River and Harbor Act of 1945 (H. Doc. 403, 77th Cong., 1st sess.) at an estimated total cost of $550,000, of which $460,000 is for lands and rights-ofway and $90,000 for pipeline relocations for 9- by 150-foot channel. Terminal facilities. Privately owned wharves and docks at Anahuac, Wallisville, Texas Gulf Sulphur Co.'s slip, Moss Bluff and Liberty, Tex., are adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design and supervision and administration cost $15,886 and $8,725. Condition and operation studies, water control management, and inspections and reports cost $27,934. Miscellaneous maintenance totaled $3,839. Construction of a ranger station at Wallisville Lake cost $26,744. Condition at end of fiscal year. The 6-foot Channel to Liberty was completed in 1925. The 9-foot Channel to Liberty has been dredged from junction with Houston Ship Channel to a point one mile below Anahuac, Texas. Work remaining consists of dredging a 9- by 150-foot channel from one mile below Anahuac, Texas to Liberty, Texas. 13C. WALLISVILLE LAKE, TEX. Location. Dam is at river mile 3.9, about 4 miles northwest of Anahuac, Tex. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 11323.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a 39,200- foot dam to store water to elevation 4 feet above mean sea level, with an 84- by 600-foot navigation lock in a cutoff channel; and extension of authorized channel to Liberty from its present terminus at channel mile 23.2 to Texas Gulf Sulphur channel at channel mile 33.6. Dam is composed of a nonoverflow section 16,820 feet long with a crest elevation varying from 13.0 to 10.0 feet above mean sea level, and an overflow section 22,400 feet long. All but 1,500 feet of overflow section has a crest elevation of 5.5 feet above mean sea level. The two remaining portions of overflow section have crest elevations of 4.0 feet above mean sea level. Both the overflow and nonoverflow sections basically are earthen levees with full or partially riprapped side slopes and paved roadways on their crest. Lock is at channel mile 28.3, has a sill depth of minus 16.17 feet below mean sea level, a normal lift of 4 feet and is founded in piles of clay. Dam controls a drainage area of 1,262 square miles below Livingston Dam (non-Federal project at channel mile 99.2) and has a storage capacity of 58,000 acre-feet. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range in bay is from 0.6 foot to 1.2 feet. Height of tide is dependent largely on wind. Strong northerly winds depress water surface 1.5 feet below mean sea level. Total estimated cost of project is $28,800,000 Federal (Corps) and $18,000 non-Federal for lands for construction of portion of channel to Liberty. (See Table 15-B for authorizing legislation.) 15-8 GALVESTON, TEX., DISTRICT Local cooperation. Local interest must contribute an amount equal to cost allocated to water supply, one-half of cost allocated to salinity control and cost allocated to recreation less cost of basic facilities and less 15 percent of total project cost. Local interest contribution is estimated at $4,956,000. For improvement of the navigation channel, exclusive of reservoir features, local interests must provide lands, disposal areas, and adequate terminal and transfer facilities, make necessary relocations of utilities crossing natural river channel and give assurances that they will hold and save the United States free from claims for damages, including but not limited to damages due to salt water intrusions, that may result from construction and operation of the navigation improvements. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Engineering and design and supervision and administration cost $115,941 and $17,670. Deficiency judgment cost was $20,352. Administration cost for Federal purchase of land totaled $20,068. Hired labor activities performed on the locks cost $7,918. Repair of fence cost $2,869. Cultural resource study cost $426. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is 75 percent complete. A contract for construction of access road, Big Hog intake structure, intake canal and access bridge was completed in October 1968. Work started July 8, 1970 on construction of the lock and dam, roads, diversion channel, and navigation channel. Work on this contract was suspended on February 26, 1973 because of an injunction halting construction. Protective work on the lock and dam was permitted and was completed on April 15, 1973. An exception to the injunction was granted for plugging oil wells which was completed in August 1973. Notice of appeal to the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit was filed on 26 April 1973. On 26 August 1974, the Court of Appeals reversed the judgment and remanded the case with directions that a revised or supplemental statement be prepared and judged anew. The draft Post Authorization Change report and Environmental Impact Statement have been coordinated with other agencies and reviewed by the public. Comments resulting from the review process are now being addressed in the final document. When the new statement has been filed with the EPA it will be submitted to the District Court. 14. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS See Table 15-C. 15. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to section 107, Public Law 86-645 (preauthorization). Reconnaissance study of feasibility of deepening and extending the existing project at Fulton, Texas, cost $3,386. Preparation of reconnaissance report and initiation of the detailed project report for investigating the feasibility of, and Federal interest in, a harbor of refuge at the East Fork, Double Bayou, Texas, cost $35,744. Beach Erosion 16. CORPUS CHRISTI BEACH, TEX. (RESTORATION PROJECT) Location. Corpus Christi Beach, a shore area having a length of about 2 miles, is located on the west side of Corpus Christi Bay in Nueces County at Corpus Christi, Texas. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 11309 and 11311.) Existing project. The plan of improvement provided for initial restoration of eroded areas of Corpus Christi Beach, over a shore length of 1.4 miles, located on the easterly side of Rincon Peninsula, with periodic nourishment as required. Estimated cost of new work is: Federal (Corps) $2,370,000 and non-Federal $2,484,975, ($2,370,000 contributed funds, $42,545 relocations, and $72,430 lands). (See Table 15-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with except for periodic nourishment. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Monitoring of beach erosion cost $5,842. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was completed in March 1978; however, erosion and/or littoral movement of the beach will be monitored during the ten years following completion to determine periodic nourishment requirements. 17. SHORELINE EROSION CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Shoreline Erosion Control Demonstration pursuant to Section 54, Public Law 251, 93rd Congress. Review of draft contract reports on those sites within Galveston District cost $337. Flood Control 18. BUFFALO BAYOU AND TRIBUTARIES, TEX. Location. Improvements are on Buffalo Bayou watershed, a part of San Jacinto River watershed, in Harris County, west and northwest of city of Houston, Tex. (See Geological Survey quadrangle sheets for Harris County.) Existing project. Provides for improvement of Buffalo Bayou and its tributaries above turning basin (Houston) of Houston Ship Channel to control floods for protection of city of Houston, and prevent deposition of silt in turning basin of ship channel by construction of detention reservoirs, enlargement and rectification of channels and construction of control works. Estimated cost for new work is. Federal (Corps) $125,900,000, including $9,900,000 for recreational facilities at completed projects (Code 713) funds, and non- Federal $87,233,000, consisting of $77,333,000 for lands and relocations, and $9,900,000 contributions for recreational facilities. (See Table 15-I on Buffalo Bayou 15-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 and tributaries.) (Also Table 15-B for authorizing 13.5 miles near its midpoint, and is located in Fort Bend, legislation.) Brazoria, Harris, and Galveston Counties. Local cooperation. Section 203, 1954 Flood Control Act applies. Local interests have accomplished all required local cooperation on Brays Bayou and White Oak Bayou. On Buffalo Bayou, local interests purchased interests that the United States had in 7 miles of rectified channel below Barker and Addicks Dams for $256,651. Of the remaining required rights-of-way on Buffalo Bayou, local interests have acquired about 40 percent. About 53 percent of required bridge relocations and 3 percent of the required utility relocations have been accomplished. Advance of $4,400,000 by the Harris County Flood Control District was refunded in September 1956. Public Law 86-53 authorized reimbursement of $38,726 to Galveston, Houston and Henderson Railroad Co. for bridge alterations at Brays Bayou. Non-Federal contributions totaled $63,661 for project betterments. Recreation development is subject to conditions of non-Federal costsharing under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. A cost sharing contract covering the work proposed is presently being negotiated. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Buffalo Bayou: Planning was continued at a cost of $203,409. Maintenance: Cost at Addicks and Barker Dams for locks, dams and reservoirs, service facilities, natural resource management, and updating master plan totaled $139,006 and $118,157. Cost for Condition and Operation Studies, Water Control Management and inspections and reports was $119,101 and $114,791. Miscellaneous repairs and work by hired labor totaled $1,007 for Addicks Dam and $1,625 for Barker Dam. Engineering and design cost was $134,289 for Addicks Dam and $74,692 for Barker Dam. Supervision and administration and real estate activities at Addicks Dam cost $92,598 and for Barker Dam $69,272. Ditch clearing and mowing at Barker Dam cost $43,007. Rehabilitation: Work accomplished on Addicks and Barker Dams cost $388,262. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project is about 56 percent complete. Construction of Barker Dam was completed in February 1945. Construction of Addicks Dam and 7.4 miles of channel rectification downstream from Addicks and Barker Dams was completed in October 1948. Modification of Barker and Addicks Dams consisting of gating of two uncontrolled conduits in each dam, was completed in fiscal year 1963. Channel rectification on Brays Bayou was completed in fiscal year 1969. Channel rectification on White Oak Bayou was completed in fiscal year 1976. A study to consider alternative flood control measures for Buffalo Bayou is in progress. Negotiations are in progress with the City of Houston for construction of the recreation facilities. 19. CLEAR CREEK, TEX. Location. Lies about midway between the two metropolitan centers of Houston on the north and Galveston-Texas City on the south. The stream forms the boundary between Harris and Brazoria Counties, and between Harris and Galveston Counties. It empties into Clear Lake and then flows into the west side of Galveston Bay. The watershed, with an area of about 250 square miles, is about 45 miles long and varies in width from about 2.0 miles at its upper end to a maximum of about Existing project. Project provides for enlargement and rectification of the existing Clear Creek channel and from the upper end of Clear Lake at Mile 3.8 to improved channel Mile 26.05, a distance of 22 miles. A number of bridges, pipelines, and other structures which now obstruct flood flows will require relocation or alteration. Estimated cost of new work is: Federal (Corps) $62,900,000 and non-Federal $17,277,000, consisting of $4,710,000 lands, $12,173,000 for relocations and $394,000 cash contribution. (See Table 15-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Section 201 of 1968 Flood Control Act applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning was continued at a cost of $339,357. Condition at end of fiscal year. Preconstruction planning was continued. 20. FREEPORT AND VICINITY, TEX. (HURRICANE-FLOOD PROTECTION) Location. Freeport is in southern part of Brazoria County on Gulf of Mexico at mouth of Brazos River, about 43 miles southwest of Galveston, Tex. Existing project. Authorized plan provides for hurricane-flood protection for a highly industrialized area and community of about 39,000 persons. Major features of project consist of improvements to 42.8 miles of existing levees, two interior drainage pumping plants and 2.1 miles of new levee. Estimated cost for new work is: $29,311,000 Federal (Corps) and non-Federal $12,562,000 consisting of $8,709,000 cash, $1,127,000 lands, and $2,726,000 relocations. (See Table 15-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Sec. 203, 1962 Flood Control Act applies. Bond issues have been passed to finance local interests share of the project. Local interests have acquired all land required. Non-Federal contribution estimated at $12,562,000 is required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Engineering and design and supervision and administration cost $15,293 and $112,584, respectively. Construction completed on Old River and Freeport Harbor Levee (Sta 132+00 to 139+00) South, (Sta 126+00 to 137+00) North, and Tidal Gate at a fiscal year cost of $9,851. Contract for repairs of effluent line from sewage treatment plant cost $4,370. A contract for Dow Barge Turning Basin Levee was continued at a cost of $20,010. Contract for Dow Barge Canal and Ethyl Dow Intake Structure was continued at a cost of $179,083. Contract for Highway 36 Vehicular Closure Structure, East Bank Brazos River (Sta 220+00 to 224+00) was completed at a fiscal year cost of $6,579. In addition, local interests performed $36,113 of relocation work. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is approximately 99 percent complete. 21. HIGHLAND BAYOU, TEX. Location. Rises near Arcadia, in Galveston County, Tex., and flows into Jones Bay, an arm of West Bay. The watershed, with an area of about 38 square miles lies entirely within Galveston County and is about 14 miles 15-10 GALVESTON, TEX., DISTRICT long and varies in width from about 0.3 miles at its lower end to a maximum of about 5 miles near its midpoint. Existing project. Plan of improvement provides for enlargement and rectification of Highland Bayou Channel and construction of a diversion dam in Highland Bayou, with a diversion channel extending southerly from the diversion dam and emptying into Jones Bay, which lies on the north side of West Bay. Estimated cost of new work is: Federal (Corps) $16,900,000 and non-Federal $3,676,000 consisting of $2,043,000 lands and $1,633,000 for relocations. (See Table 15-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Section 204, 1965 Flood Control Act applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Engineering and design and supervision and administration cost $157,815 and $199,873, respectively. A contract for construction of a railroad bridge crossing Highland Bayou at Mile 7.8 was completed at a fiscal year cost of $27,998. A contract for removal of plug from the Diversion Channel and construction of a dam in Highland Bayou was completed at a fiscal year cost of $896,974. A contract for channel rectification, Highland Bayou, Mile 9.2 to 11.68 cost $2,022,040. Condition at end of fiscal year. Initial construction contract was awarded in June 1974. Project is 65 percent complete. 22. PORT ARTHUR AND VICINITY, TEX. (HURRICANE-FLOOD PROTECTION) Location. Port Arthur is on west shore of Sabine Lake in extreme southeast part of Texas, about 14 miles from the gulf. Area under consideration is comprised of about 38,500 acres, and includes cities of Port Arthur and Groves, towns of Griffing Park, Pearl Ridge, and Lakeview, and adjacent industrial areas. Existing project. Authorized plan provides for: Raising and reconstructing 6.3 miles of existing concrete and steel sheet-pile seawall; constructing 0.3 mile of new concrete and sheet-pile seawall; raising and improving 3.0 miles of existing earth levees; construction 20.3 miles of new earth levees and constructing five interior drainage pumping plants. Estimated cost for new work, excluding inactive portion, is: Federal (Corps) $58,400,000 and non-Federal $25,028,000 consisting of $15,450,000 cash contributions, $3,403,000 for lands and $6,175,000 for relocations. Additional non-Federal cost for pumping station betterments and levee realignment betterments is $449,000. (See Table 15-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Section 203, 1962 Flood Control Act applies. Non-Federal contributions estimated at $25,028,000 are required. An additional $449,000 was contributed for project betterments requested by local interests. Operation and results during fiscal year. Engineering and design and supervision and administration cost $174,831 and $230,253, respectively. Repair of slides by hired labor cost $200,360. Star Lake Pumping Plant was completed at a fiscal year cost of $12,476. Levee repairs and turfing cost $344,662. Value engineering cost was $22,808. Contract for construction of levees, final stage, Sabine Tank Farm and Taylors Bayou Area (Sta 936+00 to 1211+30) was continued at a cost of $1,126,694. Construction of levees, Pleasure Island Barrier was continued at a cost of $28,467. In addition, local interests performed $210,772 in relocation work. Condition at the end of fiscal year. Construction of the project was initiated in March 1966. Raising and strengthening of levees surrounding Gulf Oil Company's fresh water reservoir was placed in the "inactive" category in December 1980. The active portion of the project is 98 percent complete. 23. TAYLORS BAYOU, TEX. Location. Watershed of Taylors Bayou is in extreme southeast corner of Texas adjoining basins of Neches River and Sabine Lake on the east. City of Port Arthur is about 8 miles from the main stream of Taylors Bayou. Existing project. Improvement of Taylors Bayou by enlarging and rectifying approximately 53 miles of natural and artificial channels on Taylors Bayou and tributary water courses. Phase I consists of constructing a gated structure to prevent saltwater intrusion and 2.9 miles of new diversion channel and enlarging 1.8 miles of Gulf Intracoastal Waterway and a 1.9 mile section of the Outfall Canal; Phase II consists of enlarging 6.0 miles of Taylors Bayou, 14.3 miles of Hillebrandt Bayou, 1.5 miles of Pivotot Bayou, 2.3 miles of Bayou Din, and 3.5 miles of Willow Marsh Bayou; Phase III consists of enlarging 7.0 miles of North Fork Taylors Bayou, 7.8 miles of South Fork Taylors Bayou and 4.4 miles of Mayhaw Bayou. Estimated cost for new work, excluding inactive portion, is: Federal (Corps) $50,000,000 and non-Federal $23,911,000 including $17,043,000 cash contribution, $3,737,000 lands, and $3,131,000 for relocations. (See Table 15-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Section 204, 1965 Flood Control Act, applies. Non-Federal contributions estimated at $17,043,000 are required. Operation and results during fiscal year. New work: Planning continued at a cost of $210,011. Condition at end of fiscal year. The General Design Memorandum, which included the reevaluation of benefits, was approved October 31, 1969. A supplement to the General Design Memorandum was approved August 24, 1981. The Phase III portion of the project was placed in the "inactive" category in November 1980. Planning is in progress on the active portion of the project. 24. TEXAS CITY AND VICINITY, TEX. (HURRICANE-FLOOD PROTECTION) Location. On the west and southwest shore of Galveston Bay, about 9 miles northwest of Galveston, Texas. Project fronts on the west side of Galveston Bay and protects a land area of about 36 square miles. Existing project. Plan provides for construction of improvements at Texas City and Vicinity, Texas, for control of storm tides. Improvements consist of 15.9 miles of new levees, 1.3 miles concrete floodwall, related drainage and stoplog structures, one tide control structure, and two pumping plants. Estimated cost for new work is: Federal (Corps) $37,300,000 and non-Federal $15,986,000 for seawall with closure structures, including $13,480,000 cash contribution, $1,071,000 work contribution, and $1,435,000 for lands. Additional non-Federal cost for ramps in lieu of closure structures and increased low flow pumping capacity for La Marque Pumping Station totals $256,000. (See Table 15-B for authorizing legislation.) 15-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 Local cooperation. Requirements are in Sec. 203, 1958 Flood Control Act. Local interests must contribute $15,986,000 toward the project, and, at their option, an additional $256,000 for ramps in lieu of closure structures and increased low flow pumping capacity for La Marque Pumping Station. Local interests have acquired 99 percent of all lands required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $724,415 and $304,373, respectively. A contract for a gated drainage structure on the Southwest Leg levee completed at a decrease in cost of $8,717. Contract for structures north of Texas City completed at a fiscal year cost of $154,487. Contract for construction of levee and closure structures, Southwest Leg, was continued at a fiscal year cost of $4,406,560. Work on saltwater intake structure at Monsanto chemical company cost $2,220. Miscellaneous relocation work cost $110,396. Local interest contributed $124,850 in lands. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is about 85 percent complete. 25. VINCE AND LITTLE VINCE BAYOUS, TEX. Location. Watershed of Vince Bayou and tributary, Little Vince Bayou, has an area of about 17 square miles and lies entirely within Harris County. Vince Bayou is a minor tributary of Buffalo Bayou in San Jacinto River Basin on upper gulf coast of Texas. Existing project. Provides for enlarging and rectifying channel of Vince Bayou from mouth to a point about 7.3 miles upstream and Little Vince Bayou from mouth to a point about 4.2 miles upstream, a total distance in both streams of about 11.5 miles. Estimated cost for niew work is: Federal (Corps) $15,900,000 and non-Federal $10,100,000, consisting of $6,215,000 for lands and $3,885,000 for relocations. (See Table 15-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Sec. 203, 1962 Flood Control Act, applies. Local interests have acquired all real estate for Vince Bayou channel rectification and accomplished all required relocations. On Little Vince Bayou, local interests have acquired 80 percent of the real estate and accomplished 3 percent of the required relocations. Operations and results during fiscal year. Engineering and design and supervision and administration cost $138,797 and $14,854. Adjustment of prior year cost on contract for channel rectification on Vince Bayou, Mile 3.8 to 7.29 was (-)$9,982. Condition at end of fiscal year. Two railroad bridges on Vince Bayou have been relocated, work on channel rectification on Vince Bayou between Mile 1.9 and 3.8 was completed Oct. 70 and a contract for channel rectification on Vince Bayou between Mile 3.8 to 7.29 was completed in August 1980. The entire project is about 46 percent complete. 26. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL WORKS Inspections of completed projects operated and maintained by local interests were made on Big Hog Bayou Intake Structure (October 1980); Hurricane Flood Protection at Port Arthur and Vicinity, Texas (January 1981); Hurricane Flood Protection at Freeport and Vicinity, Texas (January 1981); Lavaca-Navidad Rivers, Hallettsville, Texas (May 1981); Channel to Victoria, Gulf Intracoastal Waterway Access Road and Missouri Pacific Railroad Bridge (May 1981); Guadalupe River Flood Protection Levee at Victoria, Texas (May 1981); Tranquitas Creek at Kingsville, Texas (May 1981); San Diego Creek at Alice, Texas (May 1981); Hurricane Flood Protection at Texas City and Vicinity, Texas (July 1981); and Colorado River, Matagorda, Texas (July 1981) at a total cost of $41,256. 27. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See Table 15-D. 28. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency bank protection (Section 14 of 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Congress) Reconnaissance study of bank erosion problems at Colorado River, Wharton, Texas cost $1,734. Reconnaissance study of bank erosion problems at Fort Brown Resaca, Brownsville, Texas cost $6,352. Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization). Preparation of detailed project report for flood problems at Kirbyville, Texas cost $112,166. Reconnaissance study of flood problems at East Matagorda Bay, Sargent, Texas cost $4,761. Emergency flood control activities - repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress and antecedent legislation). Costs were $31,702 for disaster preparedness, $10,559 for emergency operations, and $218,625 for rehabilitation work in Harris County. General Investigations 29. SURVEYS Cost of surveys during fiscal year: navigation, $751,990; flood damage prevention, $1,173,328; shoreline protection $69,983; coordination with other agencies - Soil Conservation Service, $2,001 and Bureau of Reclamation, $1,033; technical and engineering assistance on shore and streambank erosion, $67; water quality management, $2,437; and preauthorization studies Phase I (Lower Rio Grande Basin), $70,412. 30. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Flood plain management and technical services were performed at a cost of $119,497 and $73,692, respectively. Cost was $4,949 for hydrologic studies. 15-12 GALVESTON, TEX., DISTRICT TABLE 15-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost To in Text Project Funding FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 Sept. 30, 1981 1. Aquatic Plant Control (Southwestern Division) 1965 Act 2. Brazos Island Harbor, Tex. (Contributed Funds) 3. Corpus Christi Ship Channel, Tex. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 4. Double Bayou, Tex. 5. Freeport Harbor, Tex. 6. Galveston Harbor and Channel, Tex. 7. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway between Apalachee Bay, Fla. and the Mexican Border (Galveston Dist.) New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major rehab. Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major rehab. Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Minor rehab. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major rehab. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 95,000 86,000 125,000 140,000 72,138 59,793 143,181 145,705 - 504,950 884,900 - 445,589 944,261 957,100' 916,162' - 11,861,3792 - 11,861,3792 2,969,710 4,391,000 3,979,516 2,017,038 28,260,1198 2,977,291 4,382,009 3,988,198 2,013,558 28,255,4833 - - - - 2,170,080 - - - - 2,170,080 1,220,000 1,997,302 4,109,109 4,083,358 13,023 3,921 1,380,000 1,521,314 3,316,000 1,957,255 9,102 285,000 271,749 7,658,074 8,400,775 (-)13,023 (-)13,023 1,100,000 1,099,502 9,084,000 9,666,964 1,806,6194 1,806,6194 41,680,8686 41,661,9766 6 59,961,8007 59,864,2547 8 - - - 3,576,684 - - - 3,576,684 - - (-)127,433 1,492,088 - - (-)152,346 1,467,175 - - - 226,558 - - - 226,558 3,359 26,923 357,000 1,117,9099 3,359 26,710 350,279 1,110,9759 31,270 91,599 2,967,381 2,994,993 90,000 86,437 581,000 379,065 85,000 39,710 4,258,500 4,451,698 25,000 44,816 2,528,000 2,539,513 2,767,15210 2,737,92210 11 27,487,44612 27,486,94312 13 - - - - 8,935 - - - - 8,935 - - - - 29,096,39214 - - - - 29,096,39214 15 2,950,660 7,346,594 4,141,100 695,000 52,916,87916 2,953,533 7,304,738 3,407,144 921,444 52,367,43016 17 - - - - 7,969,329 - - - - 7,969,329 119,741 547,050 2,103,500 1,530,000 49,989,79418s 148,520 468,261 2,156,246 1,327,915 49,760,78818 19 7,297,374 8,568,206 7,523,780 13,853,956 132,112,24720 8,029,543 7,954,510 7,445,359 14,378,786 131,853,15620 21 15-13 TABLE 15-A REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost To in Text Project Funding FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 Sept. 30, 1981 8. Houston Ship Channel, Tex. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 9. Matagorda Ship Channel, Tex. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 10. Neches River and Tributaries, Tex. Salt Water Barrier at Beaumont 11. Sabine-Neches Waterway, Tex. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 12. Texas City Channel, Tex. (Contributed Funds- Mitigation measures) 13. Trinity River and Tributaries, Tex. 16. Corpus Christi Beach, Major rehab. Approp. Cost Minor rehab. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major rehab. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Tex. (Restoration Project) Approp. Cost - - - - 434,638 - - - - 434,638 - - - - 835,873 - - - - 835,873 - - - - 35,760,38222 - - - - 35,760,38222 3,015,000 3,860,000 3,683,747 6,701,900 76,264,35623 3,122,269 2,917,824 3,970,774 7,335,604 76,227,59423 - - - - 2,591,93924 - - - - 2,591,93924 - - - - 18,058,777 - - - - 18,058,777 1,826,945 2,367,000 3,336,300 4,465,000 26,770,96825 1,828,678 1,838,831 3,853,102 2,282,888 24,577,48425 - - - - 12,259,61926 - - - - 12,259,61926 120,000 290,000 440,000 380,000 1,230,000 119,727 284,675 442,089 378,091 1,224,582 - - - - 56,136,81527 - - - - 56,136,81527 6,656,860 7,466,000 635,625 8,590,000 95,182,70928 6,693,841 7,390,897 735,933 8,326,011 94,847,59928 29 - - - - 2,680,94230 - - - - 2,680,94230 150,000 275,000 111,100 6,875,000 13,043,47231 113,481 36,051 382,394 6,313,649 12,474,48831 32 99,000 10,000 31,640 99,000 41,640 30,740 1,384,016 293,000 1,834,000 14,076,05933 30,740 1,339,561 336,870 1,182,621 13,424,09533 - - - - 726,158 - - - - 726,158 210,000 264,684 -12,800 55,953 -110,000 1,008,508 630,000 - 390,980 284,297 17,157 386,550 17,058 385,934 4,117 4,648 210,000 185,244 95,460 88,068 2,921 27,644,67634 27,612,72734 35 5,947,28636 5,939,11036 1,555,641 1,555,030 15-14 GALVESTON, TEX., DISTRICT TABLE 15-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost To in Text Project Funding FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 Sept. 30, 1981 (Contributed Funds) 18. Buffalo Bayou and Tributaries, Tex. 19. Clear Creek, Tex. 20. Freeport and Vicinity, Tex. Hurricane Flood Protection (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 21. Highland Bayou, Tex. 22. Port Arthur and Vicinity, Tex. Hurricane Flood Protection (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Recreation Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major rehab. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost 23. Taylors Bayou, Tex. New Work: Approp. Cost 24. Texas City and Vicinity,New Work: Tex. Hurricane-Flood Approp. Protection Cost (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) New Work: 25. Vince and Little Vince Bayous, Tex. Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 900,000 1,008,508 350,000 461,071 300,000 1,272,000 1,366,140 5,300,000 5,018,851 23,345 4,117 315,000 294,851 1,100,000 2,225 716,000 643,150 4,648 150,000 177,806 (-)610,000 2,921 200,000 203,409 (-)785,000 2,326 1,573,345 1,555,031 57,206,32437 57,206,32437 38 12,000 10,835 433,700 981,000 9,660,513 483,948 907,545 9,533,792 6,300,000 825,000 50,000 12,475,000 6,199,598 851,116 388,262 12,457,827 284,590 220,000 405,000 330,000 309,230 218,254 395,609 339,357 1,460,000 2,525,000 1,458,000 180,000 2,756,458 2,471,688 1,823,689 268,718 1,000,000 875,000 600,000 1,181,217 1,040,160 391,679 2,148,204 2,146,020 29,310,042 29,260,127 - 9,045,000 79,052 8,686,70439 -124,100 525,000 460,000 3,300,000 11,134,513 274,083 224,482 819,590 3,304,700 11,119,894 4,629,000 4,830,000 985,000 2,230,000 58,378,509 5,871,494 3,991,728 1,847,566 1,645,839 57,593,484 2,196,975 1,150,000 1,806,461 999,300 6,800 100,000 38,746 50,389 71,000 1,305,000 297,010 1,226,295 - 450,000 15,631,975 467,340 494,712 15,370,35240 11,500 93,786 2,050,000 2,094,828 215,000 210,011 4,183,000 4,073,009 - 600,000 400,000 1,250,000 127,290 432,810 (-)53,782 1,620,725 815,000 1,305,000 712,000 117,000 368,358 1,429,401 1,005,641 143,669 1,668,198 1,659,539 31,730,400 31,548,338 11,535,100 11,273,0744' 6,418,100 6,413,269 1. Excludes $211,510 credit for contributed work. 2. Includes $675,855 for previous projects. 3. Includes $57,734 for reconnaissance surveys. 4. Includes $123,361 for previous projects. 5. Includes $1,372,534 for previous projects. Includes $456,515 for Sec. 107 project for Port Aransas Breakwaters. 6. In addition $768 expended from contributed funds for Port Aransas Breakwaters. 7. Includes $62,452 for previous projects. Includes $49,072 for reconnaissance surveys. 8. In addition $403,442 expended from contributed funds. 9. Includes $22,931 for reconnaissance surveys. In addition $5,211 expended from contributed funds. 10. Includes $147,098 for previous projects. 11. In addition $758,303 expended from contributed funds. 15-15 TABLE 15-A REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost To in Text Project Funding FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 Sept. 30, 1981 12. Includes $5,181 for reconnaissance surveys. 13. In addition $229,311 expended from contributed funds. 14. Includes $8,421,996 for previous projects. 15. In addition, $3,648,932 expended from contributed funds. 16. Includes $86,126 for previous projects and $13,876 for reconnaissance surveys. 17. In addition $1,380,210 expended from contributed funds. 18. Includes $706,709 for previous projects. Includes Sec. 107 projects for Port Isabel Small Boat Basin ($46,559); Port Isabel Side Channel ($8,414); Offatts Bayou ($356,466); and Channel to Aransas Pass ($658,573). 19. In addition contributed funds expended for Port Isabel Small Boat Basin ($46,559); Offatts Bayou ($49,665); Channel to Aransas Pass ($347,950); and Chocolate Bayou ($658,310). 20. Includes $1,526,564 for previous projects and $236,817 for reconnaissance surveys. 21. In addition, $22,672 expended from contributed funds. 22. Includes $4,105,157 for previous projects. 23. Includes $1,213,142 for previous projects and $40,213 for reconnaissance surveys. Excludes $200,000 from contributed funds on previous projects. In addition, $163,360 expended from contributed funds. 24. Includes $1,209,179 for previous projects. 25. Includes $38,725 for reconnaissance surveys. 26. Excludes $182,800 for contributed lands. 27. Includes $5,180,832 for previous projects. 28. Includes $2,379,677 for previous projects and $23,489 for reconnaissance surveys. 29. In addition, $1,514,253 expended from contributed funds. 30. Includes $577,507 for previous projects. 31. Includes $366,823 for previous projects. 32. In addition, $895,210 expended from contributed funds. 33. Includes $195,083 for previous projects and $20,398 for reconnaissance surveys. 34. Includes $1,966,306 for previous projects. 35. In addition, $66,000 expended from contributed funds. 36. Includes $543,662 for previous projects and $12,983 for reconnaissance surveys. 37. Federal funds of $4,400,000 repaid to Harris County Flood Control District. Cost and financial data formerly reported under advanced funds transferred to Federal funds and are included herein. 38. In addition, $63,661 contributed funds expended for Brays Bayou Channel and $12,900 Federal funds and $19,104 contributed funds expended for enlargement of Clodine Ditch. 39. Excludes $1,126,905 estimated value of contributed lands and $2,726,446 for relocations. 40. Excludes $3,402,588 estimated value of contributed lands, $6,140,842 for relocations, and $217,000 credit given local sponsor for work-in-kind. 41. Excludes $1,349,069 estimated value of contributed lands and $1,070,959 credit given local sponsor for workin- kind. 15-16 GALVESTON, TEX., DISTRICT TABLE 15-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Oct. 27, 1965 July 3, 1930 May 24, 1934 (PWA) Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 July 24, 1946 May 17, 1950 July 14, 1960 AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (See Section 1 of Text) Provides for control of progressive eradication of aquatic plant growth from the navigable waters and streams in the U.S. BRAZOS ISLAND HARBOR, TEXAS (See Section 2 of Text) Jetties and jetty channel, inside channels and basins. Local cooperation requirement modified to provide contribution of funds to cover cost of original dredging of all inside channels and basins. Deepen jetty channel to 31 feet and inner channels and Brownsville and Port Isabel turning basins to 28 feet. Enlarge Port Isabel turning basin. Deepen entrance channel to 35 feet; deepen to 33 feet channel across Laguna Madre; deepen to 32 feet channels from Laguna Madre to turning basins at Brownsville and Port Isabel; widen turning basins; and dredging present shallow-draft channel south of Port Isabel from railroad bridge to Laguna Madre and connecting channel to Port Isabel turning basin. Additional connecting channel between Port Isabel and Brownsville channels; and transfer shallow-draft channels at Port Isabel to GIWW. Deepen to 38 feet in outer bar channels and 36 feet in all other authorized channels and basins; extend existing turning basins at Brownsville and Port Isabel; and construct small-boat basin with a connecting channel next to Brownsville ship channel. Widen Brownsville Channel to 300 feet at a depth of 36 feet from former Goose Island passing basin to turning basin extension,thence at a width of 500 feet and same depth to turning basin proper, deepen to 36 feet in area in southeast corner of turning basin, maintain two existing basins of fishing harbor, and a connecting channel, and construct a third basin, with necessary connecting channel and extend Brazos Island Harbor north jetty seaward 1,000 feet. 27 H. Doc. 251, 89th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 16, 71st Cong., 2nd sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 10, 71st Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 32, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 335, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 347, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 627, 79th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 192, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 428, 86th Cong., 2nd sess.' CORPUS CHRISTI SHIP CHANNEL, TEXAS (See Section 3 of Text) Mar.3, 1899 Acquisition of old curved portion of north jetty previously constructed by private parties. June 13, 1902 Complete north jetty in accordance with builder's plans. Mar. 3, 1905 Complete north jetty in accordance with builder's plans. Mar. 2, 1907 Feb. 27, 1911 Mar. 4, 19132 Sept. 23, 1922 July 3, 19303 July 3, 1930 Connect old curve to St. Joseph Island, and construct south jetty. Dredge roadstead in Harbor Island Basin to 20 feet deep and construct 10,000 linear feet of stone dike on St. Joseph Island. Channel between jetties and Harbor Island Basin to 25 feet deep, extend jetties seaward, extend dike on St. Joseph Island 9,100 feet, and dredge approach channel 12 feet deep to town of Port Aransas. Dredging channel from Aransas Pass to Corpus Christi, 25 feet deep, 200 feet bottom width. Deepen entrance channel from gulf to Harbor Island and provide an inner basin at Harbor Island of reduced area but greater depth. Channel from Aransas Pass to Corpus Christi Channel with depth 30 feet. Specified in Act. Specified in Acts. Specified in Act. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 5, 59th Cong., 2nd sess H. Doc. 1094, 61st Cong., 3rd sess. H. Doc. 1125, 62nd Cong., 3rd sess. H. Doc. 321, 67th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 214, 70th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 9, 71st Cong., 1st sess. 15-17 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 15-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Aug. 30, 19354 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 June 20, 1938 Mar. 2, 1945 June 30, 1948 Sept. 3, 1954 Sept. 3, 19546 Sept. 3, 1954 July 3, 1958 July 3, 1958 July 3, 1958 July 3, 1958 July 14, 1960 (As amended by Dec. 31, 1970) Enlarge all channels from gulf to western end of basin dredged by Humble Oil and Refining Co., at its docks on Harbor Island. Maintain channel and maneuvering basin between breakwater and western shoreline of Corpus Christi Bay. Maintain 30-foot depth of approach channel, turning basin at Corpus Christi, Industrial Canal and turning basin at Avery Point. Maintain and deepen to 32 feet channel from deep water at Port Aransas to and including turning basin at Corpus Christi. Extend main turning basin at Corpus Christi westward 2,500 feet at its present width and depth, deepen existing Industrial Canal and turning basin to 32 feet and extend this canal at a depth of 32 feet and general width of 150 feet, westward along Nueces Bay shore to a turning basin 32 feet by 900 feet, and 1,000 feet long near Tule Lake. Provide depth of 34 feet in all project channels and basins from Port Aransas to and including Tule Lake turning basin, for a width of 250 feet from Port Aransas to breakwater at Corpus Christi, for a width of 200 feet in Industrial Canal and in channel between Avery Point and Tule Lake turning basins, and widen Avery Point turning basin to 1,000 feet. Deepen entrance channel to 38 feet from gulf to outer end of jetty; 38 feet decreasing to 36 feet thence to station 90 north jetty; and 36 feet in all other deep water channels and basins except 2,000-foot undredged part of inner basin at Harbor Island, and a width of 400 feet in channel from Port Aransas to Maneuvering basin at Corpus Christi. An anchorage basin 12 feet deep, from 300 to 400 feet wide, and 900 feet long in Turtle Cove at Port Aransas, Texas. Branch channel 32 feet by 150 feet, extending northerly from main channel in vicinity of Port Ingleside, along north shore of Corpus Christi Bay to Reynolds Metals Co. plant and turning basin 32 feet deep and 800 feet square near plant in general vicinity of LaQuinta, Texas. An entrance channel 36 by 400 feet on a tangent alinement from 400-foot channel in Corpus Christi Bay, near Corpus Christi breakwater, to flared approach channel to Corpus Christi turning basin. Deepen and widen LaQuinta Channel to 36 by 200 feet; enlarge LaQuinta turning basin to 36 by 800 by 1,000 feet; a flared entrance to channel; and widening at curves. Deepen entrance channel to 42 feet from gulf to outer end of jetty; 40 feet in all other deep-water channels and basins except undredged northward extension to inner basin at Harbor Island and branch channel to LaQuinta; and widen Industrial Canal to 400 feet with flared entrances to Corpus Christi and Avery Point turning basins. Channel 40 by 200 feet extending 2.2 miles from Tule Lake turning basin to a turning basin 40 feet deep, 700 to 900 feet wide, 1,000 feet long at Viola, Texas. Depth of 12 feet and a width of 100 feet in locally dredged Jewel Fulton Canal from LaQuinta Channel to a turning basin 12 by 200 by 400 feet, and assumption of maintenance by United States. Construction of a breakwater at entrance to harbor area at Port Aransas, and realignment of existing 12-foot by 100 foot project channel. Rivers and Harbors Committee Does. 35, 72nd Cong., 1st sess., and 40, 73rd Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 130, 72nd Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 13, 74th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 63, 74th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 574, 75th Cong., 3rd sess. H. Doc. 544, 78th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 560, 80th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 654, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 89, 83rd Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 487, 83rd Cong., 2nd sess. 3. Doc. 33, 85th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 361, 85th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 361, 85th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 361, 85th Cong., 2nd sess. Sec. 107, PL 86-645 15-18 GALVESTON, TEX., DISTRICT TABLE 15-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Aug. 13, 1968 Oct. 22, 1976 Mar. 3, 1899 July 14, 1960 (As amended by Oct. 25, 1965) Mar. 3, 1899 Mar. 2, 1907 Feb. 27, 1911 Mar. 4, 1913 Aug. 8, 1917 Mar. 3, 19256 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 19357 Aug. 30, 1935 Provides for a project depth of 45 feet in the existing deep-draft channels and basins, for construction of a new deep-draft turning point, for construction of a deep-draft mooring area and mooring facilities and for widening of the channels and basins at certain locations. The Act also deauthorized the undredged northward extension of Inner Basin at Harbor Island and the undredged west turnout (Wye connection) between the LaQuinta Channel and the main channel of the waterway. Modified local cooperation requirements for 1968 Act. Shifted responsibility for cost of disposal areas and confinement works from sponsor to joint 75 percent Federal and 25 percent non-Federal responsibility. DOUBLE BAYOU, TEXAS (See Section 4 of Text) A channel 6-foot deep and 100-feet wide through the bar at mouth of Double Bayou. 7-foot by 125-foot channel from the 7-foot depth in Trinity Bay to the intersection of Double Bayou Channel with the channel to Liberty; and thence a 7- by 100-foot channel upstream for 2.0 miles. FREEPORT HARBOR, TEXAS (See Section 5 of Text) Dredging and other work necessary in judgment of Secretary of War for improving harbor; for taking over jetties and privately built works at mouth of river. Examination authorized. Work later confined to maintenance of jetties. Repairs to jetties and dredging. Construct seagoing hopper dredge. Purchase of one 15-inch pipeline dredge and equipment, its operation of 3 years, operation of seagoing dredge one-half time for 3 years, and repairs to jetties. Diversion dam, diversion channel, and necessary auxiliary works. Maintenance of diversion channel at expense of local interest. Deepening channels and basins. Maintenance of present project dimensions of channels and basins at Federal expense. May 17, 1950 Deepen outer bar channel to 38 feet from gulf to a point within jetties, thence 36 feet in authorized channels to and including upper turning basin. July 3, 1958 Relocate outer bar channel on straight alignment with jetty channel and maintain Brazos Harbor entrance channel and turning basin (constructed by local interests). Oct. 5, 1961 Modification of HD 1469. Revoking certain provisions of local cooperation. Dec. 31, 1970 Relocation of entrance channel and deepen to 47 feet; enlargement to a depth of 45 feet and relocation of jetty channel and inside main channel; deepening to 45 feet of channel to Brazosport; enlargement of the widened area of Quintana Point to provide a depth of 45 feet with a 750-foot diameter turning area; Brazosport turning basin to 45 feet deep with a 1,000 foot turning area; a new turning basin with a 1,200 foot diameter turning area and 45 feet deep; deepening Brazosport channel to 36 by 750 feet diameter; flared approaches from Brazos Harbor Channel; relocation of north jetty and rehabilitation of south jetty. S. Doc. 99, 90th Cong., 2nd sess.' Sec. 124, PL 94-587 H. Doc. 387, 55th Cong., 2nd sess. Sec. 107, PL 86-645 Specified in Act. H. Doc. 1087, 60th Cong., 2nd sess. Specified in Act. Specified in Act. Specified in Act. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 10, 68th Cong., 2nd sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 18, 70th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 15, 72nd Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Does. 15, 72nd Cong., 1st sess., and 29, 73rd Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 195, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 433, 84th Cong., 2nd sess. PL 394, 87th Cong. H. Doc. 289, 93rd Cong., 2nd sess.' 15-19 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 15-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Aug. 5, 1886 June 13, 1902 Mar. 3, 1905 Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 2, 1907 June 25, 19109 July 27, 1916 July 18, 1918 Sept. 22, 1922 Jan. 21, 1927 Aug. 30, 193511 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 April 4, 1938 June 30, 1948 May 17, 1950 July 3, 1958 June 23, 1971 (House Res.) Nov. 18 1971 (Sen. Res.) Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 3, 1925 GALVESTON HARBOR AND CHANNEL, TEXAS (See Section 6 of Text) Construct 2 rubblestone jetties at entrance to Galveston Harbor. A channel 1,200 by 30 feet from Bolivar Roads (outer end of old inner bar near Fort Point) at 51st Street.8 Purchase or construct hydraulic pipeline dredge. Extension of jetties to present project length and construction and operation of a dredge. Extension of Galveston Channel from 51st to 57th Sts., with depth of 30 feet and width of 700 feet. Conditional extension of Galveston Channel between 51st and 57th Sts., 30 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide. Extend seawall at Galveston from angle at 6th St. and Broadway to vicinity of Fort San Jacinto. Deepen harbor channel to 35 feet and widen to 800 feet. Further extension of seawall at Galveston to a junction with south jetty; and repairing seawall in front of Fort Crockett reservation. Deepen Galveston Channel to 32 feet; and maintain Galveston Harbor channels to dimensions of 800 feet wide, 35 feet deep on outer bar and 34 feet deep on inner bar.' � Maintain State Highway Ferry Landing Channels to dimensions of 12 by 100 feet. Construct 13 groins along gulf shore from 12th to 61st Sts. in city of Galveston at a limited cost of $234,000 (10 groins constructed). Deepen Galveston Channel to 34 feet (Bolivar Roads to 43rd St.). Deepen Galveston entrance channel to 36 feet. Completion of project for construction of 13 groins. Deepen Galveston Harbor to 38 feet from gulf to a point 2 miles west of seaward end of north jetty; thence 36 feet to Bolivar Roads; revoking authority for maintenance of ferry channels; and Galveston channel to 36 feet deep from Bolivar Roads to 43rd Street. Construct extension of Galveston Seawall from 61st Street, southwesterly 16,300 feet along gulf shore. Deepen Galveston Harbor to 42 feet from gulf to point 2 miles west of seaward end of north jetty and 40 feet thence to Bolivar Roads. Deepen Galveston Channel to 40 feet from Bolivar Roads to 43rd Street. GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN APALACHEE BAY, FLA. AND MEXICAN BORDER (GALV. DIST.) (See Section 7 of Text)1 2 Channel 4 by 100 feet from West Galveston Bay across Chocolate Bay to 4 feet of water in Chocolate Bay. Channel 9 by 100 feet, Sabine River to Galveston Bay, and a 20-inch pipeline dredge. Such passing places, widening at bends, locks or guard locks and railway bridges over artificial cuts as are necessary. H. Doc. 85, 49th Cong., 1st sess., and Annual Report, 1886, p. 1311. H. Doc. 264, 56th Cong., 2nd sess. Specified in Act. H. Doc. 340, 59th Cong., 2nd sess., and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 11, 59th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 768, 59th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 328, 61st Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 1390, 62nd Cong., 3rd sess. H. Doc. 758, 65th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 693, 66th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 307, 69th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 31, 72nd Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 400, 73rd Cong., 2nd sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 61, 74th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 57, 74th Cong., 1st sess. PL 463, 75th Cong. H. Doc. 561, 80th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 173, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 350, 85th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 121, 92nd Cong., 1st sess (Sec. 201, PL 89-298) H. Doc. 445, 56th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 238, 68th Cong., 1st sess. 15-20 TABLE 15-B GALVESTON, TEX., DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Jan. 21, 1927 Aug. 26, 1937 June 20, 193813 June 20, 1938 June 20, 1938 June 20, 1938 June 20, 1938 Mar. 23, 1939 July 23, 1942 Mar. Mar. Mar. Mar. Mar. 1945 19459 1945 1945 194514 July 24, 1946 July 24, 1946 May May May July 17, 17, 17, 12, Sept. 3, Sept. 3, 1950 1950 1950 1952 1954156 1954 15-21 Channel 9 by 100 feet, Galveston Bay to Corpus Christi. Maintenance of a flood-discharge channel in Colorado River. Channel 9 by 100 feet in San Bernard River, Texas. Channel in Colorado River, 9 by 100 feet, with basin. Channel 9 by 100 feet from Palacios through Trepalacios and Matagorda Bays. Channel 9 by 200 feet from main channel to harbor at Rockport and improve harbor to 9-foot depth. Channel 6 by 100 feet from main channel to Aransas Pass, Tex. Enlarge waterway to depth of 12 feet and a width of 125 feet from Sabine River to Corpus Christi. Enlarge waterway from Corpus Christi to vicinity of Mexican border to provide a depth of 12 feet and width of 125 feet throughout. Channel 6 by 60 feet from GIWW to a point in Chocolate Bayou near Liverpool. Channel 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide from main channel near Port O'Connor, Tex., into Barroom Bay. Enlarge channel from main channel to Aransas Pass, Tex., providing a depth of 9 feet and width of 100 feet. Channel 12 by 125 feet from main channel to Red Fish Landing, Tex., with basin. Channel 12 feet deep and 125 feet wide from main channel to vicinity of Harlingen, Tex., via Arroyo Colorado with basin. Fill a portion of shallow-draft channel adjacent to Port Isabel Turning Basin, construct a channel to connect shallow-draft channel with main channel near shoreline of Laguna Madre, and enlarge shallow-draft channel west of this connection, all to 12 foot depth and bottom width of 125 feet. Reroute main channel to north shore of Red Fish Bay between Aransas Bay and Corpus Christi Bay; deepen tributary channel from Port Aransas to Aransas Pass, Tex., 12 feet and extended basin at same depth. Deauthorized 6 by 60 foot channel in Chocolate Bayou and reauthorized the 4 by 100-foot channel. Alternate channel across South Galveston Bay between Port Bolivar and Galveston causeway. "Red Fish Landing" changed to "Port Mansfield, Tex." Incorporate as part of Intracoastal Waterway a channel 9 by 100 feet from main channel via Seadrift to point on Guadalupe River 3 miles above Victoria, Tex., authorized by River and Harbor Act of 1945. Small craft harbor 9 by 200 by 1,000 feet at Seadrift with an entrance channel 9 by 100 feet. Widen tributary channel between Port Aransas and Aransas Pass, Tex., to 125 feet; straighten and widen to 125 feet connecting channel to Conn Brown Harbor, and maintain Conn Brown Harbor at Federal expense, all to 12 feet deep. H. Doc. 238, 68th Cong., 1st sess. S. Committee print, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 640, 75th Cong., 3rd sess. H. Doc. 642, 75th Cong., 3rd sess. H. Doc. 564, 75th Cong., 3rd sess. H. Doc. 641, 75th Cong., 3rd sess. H. Doc. 643, 75th Cong., 3rd sess. H. Doc. 230, 76th Cong., 1st sess. PL 675, 77th Cong. H. Doc. 337, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 428, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 383, 77th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 248, 78th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 402, 77th Cong., 1st sess. (See Public Law 14, 79th Cong.) H. Doc. 627, 79th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 700, 79th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 768, 80th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 196, 81st Cong., 1st sess. PL 516, 81st Cong. PL 527, 82nd Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 478, 81st Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 376, 83rd Cong., 2nd sess. REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 15-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Sept. 9, 1959 July 14, 1960 July 14, 1960 (As amended Dec. 31, 1970) July 14, 1960 (As amended Dec. 31, 1970) July 14, 1960 (As amended Dec. 31, 1970) Oct. 23, 196216 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 27, 196517 Aug. 13, 1968 Mar. 5, 1905 Mar. 2, 1919 Mar. 3, 1925 Improve channels and basins comprising channel to Port Mansfield constructed in part by Federal Government and in part by local interest; constructing turnout curves at Gulf Intracoastal Waterway intersection and bend easing at entrance to turning basin; construct parallel jetties at gulf entrance; maintenance of locally dredged jetty channel 16 by 250 feet; and maintenance of small craft basin. Entrance channel 7 feet deep by 75 feet wide from main channel to Gulf of Mexico to inside shoreline at Port Isabel, Tex., an inner channel 6 feet deep by 50 feet wide from entrance channel to East Harbor Basin, and an irregular-shaped harbor basin 6 feet deep having a surface area of about 7 acres. Deepen the existing 6-foot channel at Port Isabel to 12 feet and removing the submerged bars at each end of the island to a depth of -12 feet MLT. Deepening the existing channel to 12 by 125 feet, and extend southeasterly from the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway main channel in West Galveston Bay, into Offatts Bayou, a distance of 2.2 miles, and a west turnout 12 by 125 feet between the proposed Offatts Bayou Channel and the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway. Deepening Aransas Pass tributary channel to 14 feet from mile 0 at Harbor Island to mile 6.1 at the city of Aransas Pass; widening to 175 feet between miles 3.5 and 4.6; and deepening Conn Brown Harbor, turning basin and connecting channel between Conn Brown Harbor and turning basin. Improve main channel 16 feet deep and 150 feet wide from Sabine River to Houston Ship Channel; with two relocations; relocate main channel in Matagorda Bay and Corpus Christi Bay; and maintaining existing Lydia Ann Channel. Deepen and widen channel to Palacios; construct two protective breakwaters; maintain and deepen existing basins; and deepen, enlarge and maintain existing approach channel to basin No. 2. Eliminates requirement of local interest to construct bridge at mile 29.2 turning basin at Victoria, and maintain turning basins at Victoria and Seadrift; provide: Federal construction of vertical-lift railroad bridge at Missouri-Pacific Railroad mainline crossing, mile 29.2; construction and future maintenance of basin near Victoria, Texas, and maintenance of basin constructed by local interests at Seadrift, Tex. Modify existing Federal navigation project to provide a channel extending from Gulf Intracoastal Waterway through Chocolate Bay and Chocolate Bayou to project channel mile 8.2 thence to a turning basin near channel mile 13.2 and for salt water barrier in Chocolate Bayou about 3.7 miles upstream from basin (channel mile 16.9). Entrance channel 15 feet deep and 200 feet wide at the mouth of Colorado River Channel protected by an east jetty 3,500 feet long extending to 12-foot depth and a west jetty 2,900 feet long extending to 5-foot contour; make channel 12 feet by 100 feet from gulf shore to Matagorda, including recreation facility, a turning basin 12 feet by 300 feet wide and 1,450 feet long, and a new diversion channel 250 feet wide and varying in depth from 20 to 23 feet including a closure dam across the present river channel. HOUSTON SHIP CHANNEL, TEXAS (See Section 8 of Text) Easing or cutting off sharp bends and construction of a pile dike.' 8 A channel 30 feet deep, widen bend at Manchester and enlarge turning basin. A light-draft extension of channel to mouth of White Oak Bayou. 9 S. Doc. 11, 86th Cong., 1st sess. Sec. 107, PL 645, 86th Cong. Sec. 107, PL 86-645 Sec. 107, PL 86-645 Sec. 107, PL 86-645 H. Doc. 556, 87th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 504, 87th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 288, 87th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 217, 89th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 102, 90th Cong., 2nd sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 35, 61st Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 1632, 65th Cong., 3rd sess. H. Doc. 93, 67th Cong., 1st sess. 15-22 GALVESTON, TEX., DISTRICT TABLE 15-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 193511 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 June 30, 1948 July 3, 195820 July 14, 1960 Oct. 27, 1965 June 25, 1910 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 July 3, 1958 July 3, 1958 Oct. 22, 1976 July 25, 1912 Widen channel through Morgan Point and to a point 4,000 feet above Baytown and widen certain bends. Deepen to 32 feet in main channel and turning basin, and a 400-foot width through Galveston Bay. Deepen to 34 feet in main channel and widen from Morgan Point to turning basin. Branch channel 10 by 60 feet behind Brady Island. Widen channel from Morgan Point to lower end of Fidelity Island with turning points at mouth of Hunting Bayou and lower end of Brady Island. Widen channel from lower end of Fidelity Island to Houston turning basin and dredge off-channel silting basins. Deepen to 36 feet from Bolivar Roads to and including main turning basin at Houston, Texas, including turning points at Hunting Bayou and Brady Island. Deepen to 40 feet from Bolivar Roads to Brady Island, construct Clinton Island turning basin, a channel 8 by 125 feet at Five Mile Cut, and improve shallow-draft channel at Turkey Bend. Barbour Terminal at Morgan Point. Restoring existing locally dredged channel from mile 0 to 0.34 to 36 feet deep and dredging a 15-12 ft. channel from mile 0.34 to 2.81, in Greens Bayou.2 ' MATAGORDA SHIP CHANNEL, TEXAS (See Section 9 of Text) Channel to Port Lavaca, Texas 7 feet deep and 89 feet bottom width. Extend 7-foot channel to shoreline of Lavaca Bay at mouth of Lynns Bayou. Deepen and widen channel to present project dimensions. Extend channel 6 by 100 feet from Port Lavaca via Lavaca Bay, Lavaca and Navidad Rivers to Red Bluff, a distance of 20 miles. A harbor of refuge 9 feet deep near Port Lavaca and an approach channel 100 feet wide and equal depth. Deepen to 12 feet and widen to 125 feet Port Lavaca Channel and approach channel to harbor of refuge: deepen to 12 feet Port Lavaca turning basin and basins at harbor of refuge. An entrance channel 38 by 300 feet, a channel 36 by 200 feet, 22 miles long across Matagorda and Lavaca Bays to Point Comfort, Texas, a turning basin 36 feet deep and 1,000 feet square at Point Comfort, and dual jetties at entrance from gulf. NECHES RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, SALT WATER BARRIER AT BEAUMONT, TEXAS (See Section 10 of Text) Construct gated salt water barrier in Neches River consisting of seven 40 x 24.5 foot tainter gates; gated navigation by-pass channel with clear opening of 56 feet and depth of 16 feet; access road and levee; and auxiliary dam across canal which drains adjacent bayou. SABINE-NECHES WATERWAY, TEXAS (See Section 11 of Text) Existing project dimensions of jetties, a 26-foot channel through Sabine Pass, Port Arthur Canal and Port Arthur turning basin; and a 26-foot turning basin at Port Arthur. A depth of 25-feet in Sabine- H. Doc. 13, 71st Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 28, 72nd Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 58, 74th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 226, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 256, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 737, 79th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 561, 80th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 350, 85th Cong., 2nd sess.' Sec. 107, PL 86-645 R. Doc. 257, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 1082, 60th Cong., 2nd sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 28, 74th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 37, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 314, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 731, 79th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 131, 84th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 388, 84th Cong., 2nd sess.' Sec. 102, PL 94-587 H. Doc. 773, 61st Cong., 2nd sess. 15-23 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 15-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Sept. 22, 1922 Sept. 22, 1922 Mar. 3, 1925 Jan. 21, 1927 Aug. 30, 193511 Aug. 30, 193511 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Aug. 26, 1937 June 20, 193822 Oct. 17, 1940 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 July 24, 194623 Neches Canal, Neches River to Beaumont and Sabine River to Orange, including cutoffs and widening channels. Deepen channels to 30 feet from gulf to Beaumont, with increased widths and an anchorage basin in Sabine Pass. Deepen Port Arthur east and west turning basins and approach channel to 30 feet. Take over and deepen to 30 feet channel connecting west turning basin with Taylors Bayou turning basin. For a 30-foot depth in channel from mouth of Neches River to cutoff in Sabine River near Orange. Removal of guard lock in Sabine-Neches Canal. Widen Sabine Pass and jetty channel, Port Arthur Canal, and Sabine-Neches Canal. For dredging 2 passing places in Sabine- Neches Canal, easing of bends, removal and reconstructing Port Arthur field office, extending Beaumont turning basin upstream 200 feet above new city wharves, and an anchorage basin in Sabine Pass. A depth of 32 feet in channels from gulf to Beaumont turning basin, including all turning basins at Port Arthur. Deepen channels to 34 feet with increased widths from gulf to Beaumont turning basin. Construct suitable permanent protective works along Sabine Lake. Maintain Taylors Bayou turning basin. Maintain channel from Sabine River to Orange Municipal wharf. Dredging 500 feet from eastern end of Harbor Island and abandonment of channel south and west of Harbor Island. Increased widths of channels from gulf to Beaumont turning basin and channel connecting Port Arthur west turning basin and Taylors Bayou turning basin, deepen Beaumont turning basin and Beaumont turning extension to 34 feet; and dredge a new cutoff from Smith's Bluff cutoff to McFadden Bend. Abandon Orange turning basin; dredge a channel 25 by 150 feet, suitably widened on bends to highway bridge, and dredge a cutoff channel opposite Orange. Extend Beaumont turning basin upstream 300 feet. Widen Port Arthur west turning basin to 600 feet. Dredge a channel from Beaumont turning basin to vicinity of Pennsylvania Shipyard. Deepen Sabine Pass outer bar channel to 37 feet, Sabine Pass jetty channel to 36 feet at inner end, deepen to 36 feet Sabine Pass Channel, Port Arthur Canal, Port Arthur east and west turning basins, Taylors Bayou turning basin and channel from Port Arthur west turning basin to Taylors Bayou turning basin, deepen to 36 feet and widen to 400 feet Sabine-Neches Canal from Port Arthur Canal to mouth of Neches River except through Port Arthur Bridge; deepen Neches River channel from mouth to Beaumont turning basin to 36 feet widening to 350 feet from Smith's Bluff to Beaumont turning basin; deepen junction area on Neches River at Beaumont turning basin to 36 feet; and widen Sabine-Neches Canal between Neches and Sabine Rivers to 150 feet. H. Doc. 975, 66th Cong., 3rd sess. S. Doc. 152, 67th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 234, 68th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 287, 69th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 27, 72nd Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 12, 74th Cong., 1st sess. Specified in Act. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 3, 75th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 20, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 581, 75th Cong., 3rd sess. S. Doc. 14, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 685, 76th Cong., 3rd sess. S. Doc. 60, 77th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 158, 77th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 571, 79th Cong., 2nd sess. 15-24 GALVESTON, TEX., DISTRICT TABLE 15-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents July 24, 194624 July 24, 1946 May 17, 1950 Sept. 3, 19542 Oct. 23, 196226 Mar. 4, 1913 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 193511 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 June 30, 1948 July 14, 1960 Oct. 12, 1972 (Sen. Res.) Oct. 12, 1972 (House Res.) Improve Cow Bayou, Texas, by construction of a channel 100 feet wide and 13 feet deep extending from navigation channel in Sabine River to a point 0.5 mile above county bridge at Orangefield, Texas, with a turning basin. Improve Adams Bayou, Texas, to provide a channel 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide extending from 12-foot depth in Sabine River to first county highway bridge across bayou. Deepen to 36 feet and widen to 400 feet the Sabine-Neches Canal near Port Arthur bridge; reconstruct Port Arthur Bridge and relocate Port Arthur field office. Rectification of certain reaches of existing Sabine Pass Channel, Sabine-Neches Canal, and Neches River and Sabine River Channel; widen to 350 feet entrance channel to Port Arthur turning basins; widen curve at junction of Port Arthur and Sabine-Neches Canals; relocate and enlarge Sabine Pass anchorage basin to 34 by 1,500 by 3,000 feet; widen to 200 feet Sabine-Neches Canal from mouth of Neches River to mouth of Sabine River and Sabine River Channel to upper end of existing project at Orange, except for channel around Harbor Island at Orange; deepen to 30 feet Sabine River Channel from cutoff near Orange municipal slip to upper end of project, except around Harbor Island; and enlarge area at entrance to Orange municipal slip to provide a maneuvering basin. Improve outer bar channel to 42 and 40 feet for all inland channels to Port Arthur and Beaumont; width of 500 feet in Port Arthur Canal and 400 feet in Neches River Channel to Beaumont with three turning points in Neches River; a channel, 12 by 125 feet, extending in Sabine River to Echo; and replace an obstructive bridge at Port Arthur, Texas. Deauthorization of uncompleted portion of channel between Port Arthur west turning basin and Taylors Bayou turning basin and enlargement of entrance channel to Port Arthur turning basins. TEXAS CITY CHANNEL, TEXAS (See Section 12 of Text) A channel 300 by 30 feet and construct a pile dike 28,200 feet long north to channel. A harbor 800 by 30 feet at Texas City, and construct a rubblemound dike. Extension of rubblemound dike to shoreline. Deepen channel and harbor to 32 feet. Deepen channel and harbor to 34 feet. Extend harbor 1,000 feet southward, 800 by 34 feet. Deepen channel and harbor to 36 feet, widen channel to 400 feet and harbor to 1,000 feet and changing name of project to "TEXAS CITY CHANNEL, TEXAS." Deepen channel and turning basin to 40 feet and construct 16-foot Industrial Barge Canal. Widen the existing main turning basin to 1,200 feet including relocation of the basin 85 feet to the east; providing a 40-foot deep channel in the Industrial Canal at widths of 300-400 feet, with a turning basin at the head of the canal 40 feet deep, 1,150 feet long, and 1,000 feet wide, and easing of the bend at the entrance to the canal, and deauthorization of shallow-draft Industrial Barge Canal not incorporated in the plan of improvement above. 15-25 H. Doc. 702, 79th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 626, 79th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 174, 81st Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 80, 83rd Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 553, 87th Cong., 2nd sess.' H. Doc. 1390, 62nd Cong., 3rd sess. H. Doc. 107, 71st Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 4, 73rd Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 46, 73rd Cong., 2nd sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 62, 74th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 47, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 561, 80th Cong., 2nd sess.1 H. Doc. 427, 86th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 199, 92nd Cong., 2nd sess. (Sec. 201, PL 89-298) REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 15-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 3, 1905 July 25, 1912 Sept. 22, 1922 Mar. 2, 1945 July 24, 1946 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 27, 1965 Dec. 15, 1970 (House Res.) Dec. 17, 1970 (Sen. Res.) June 20, 1938 Sept. 3, 1954 Oct. 27, 1965 Aug. 13, 1968 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 27, 1965 Oct. 23, 1962 TRINITY RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, TEXAS (See Section 13 of Text) Anahuac Channel. Six-foot channel to Liberty. Abandon improvements above Liberty and terminate all improvements by lock and dam, leaving a 6-foot channel from Liberty to mouth. Provides for a navigable channel from the Houston Ship Channel near Red Fish Bar in Galveston and Trinity Bays to the mouth of Trinity River and 9 feet deep and 150 feet wide in the river section, with a turning basin at Liberty. Modification of the project to provide for a channel 9 feet deep and 150 feet wide from the Houston Ship Channel near Red Fish Bar in Galveston Bay extending along the east shore of Trinity Bay to the mouth of the Trinity River at Anahuac, including protective spoil embankment on the bay side of the channel in lieu of the 9 by 200- foot channel in Galveston and Trinity Bays. Provides for the multiple-purpose Wallisville Reservoir, including a navigation lock in the Wallisville dam at Channel Mile 28.30 and advancement of the Channel to Liberty from one mile below Anahuac (Mile 23.2) to the Texas Gulf Sulphur Company's slip at Channel Mile 35.8, and incorporation into existing project Anahuac Channel and mouth of Trinity River projects. Reevaluation of navigation benefits. CORPUS CHRISTI BEACH, TEXAS (RESTORATION PROJECT) (See Section 16 of Text) Restoration and periodic nourishment of 1.4 miles of beach. BUFFALO BAYOU AND TRIBUTARIES, TEXAS (See Section 18 of Text) Barker & Addicks Reservoirs, Texas. Clearing, straightening, enlarging and lining of Buffalo Bayou, Brays, and White Oak Bayous. Extend upper limits of White Oak Bayou upstream about 2.1 miles from BRI RR bridge to mouth of Cole Creek. CLEAR CREEK, TEXAS (See Section 19 of Text) Channel enlargement and rectification from upper end of Clear Lake at mile 3.8 to improved channel Mile 34.8. FREEPORT AND VICINITY, TEXAS (HURRICANEFLOOD PROTECTION) (See Section 20 of Text) Improvements to 42.8 miles of existing levees, 2.1 miles of new levees and 2 interior drainage pumping plants. HIGHLAND BAYOU, TEXAS (See Section 21 of Text) Enlargement and rectification of Highland Bayou Channel, construction of diversion dam, and diversion channel. PORT ARTHUR AND VICINITY, TEXAS (HURRICANEFLOOD PROTECTION) (See Section 22 of Text) Raising and reconstructing 6.3 miles of existing seawall; constructing 0.3 mile of new seawall, 20.3 miles new levees and five pumping plants; and raising and improving 7.5 miles of existing levees. "2 H. Doc. 989, 66th Cong., 3rd sess. H. Doc. 403, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 634, 79th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 215, 87th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 276, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 415, 91st Cong., 2nd sess. (Sec. 201, PL 89-298) H. Doc. 456, 75th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 250, 83rd Cong., 2nd sess.' H. Doc. 169, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 351, 90th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 495, 87th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 168, 89th Cong., 1st sess.' H. Doc. 505, 87th Cong., 2nd sess.' 15-26 GALVESTON, TEX., DISTRICT TABLE 15-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents TAYLORS BAYOU, TEXAS (See Section 23 of Text) Oct. 27, 1965 Enlarging and rectifying channels; construction of diversion H. Doc. 206, 89th Cong., channel; a salt water gate; enlargement of GIWW 1.3 miles and 1st sess.1 alteration of State Highway 87 bridge."9 TEXAS CITY AND VICINITY, TEXAS (HURRICANEFLOOD PROTECTION) ( See Section 24 of Text) July 3, 1958 Construction of improvements for control of storm tides, consisting H. Doc. 347, 85th Cong., of new and enlarged levees and floodwalls approximately 14.1 and 2nd sess.' 2.1 miles in length; related drainage and stoplog structures; a navigation opening and pumping plants. VINCE AND LITTLE VINCE BAYOUS, TEXAS (See Section 25 of Text) Oct. 23, 1962 Enlarging and rectifying channel of Vince Bayou and Little Vince H. Doc. 441, 87th Cong., Bayou upstream for a total of 11.5 miles for both streams. 2nd sess.' 1. Contains latest published maps. 2. Extension of north jetty 1,950 feet and south jetty 1,265 feet considered inactive. 3. Dredging 2,000 by 650-foot northerly extension of inner basin deauthorized. 4. Included in Public Works Administration program Sept. 6, 1933 and Feb. 16, 1935. 5. West leg of Wye junction with main channel deauthorized. 6. Construction of lock in diversion dam at local expense considered inactive. 7. Dredging upper .5 mile of channel to vicinity of Stauffer Chemical plant was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. Included in Public Works Administration program Sept. 6, 1933. 8. Dredging 43rd to 51st Streets was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. 9. Deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. 10. Deepening 43rd to 57th Streets was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. 11. Previously authorized Sept. 6, 1933 by Public Works Administration. 12. H.Doc. 230, 76th Cong., 1st sess. and project documents contain latest published maps. 13. Dredging upper 3.5 miles was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. 14. Dredging upper 5 miles is inactive. 15. Inactive. 16. Portion of 16-foot by 150-foot channel from Sabine River to Houston Ship Channel and relocation of channel in Matagorda Bay are in inactive category. 17. The 9 feet by 100 feet channel from Mile 8.2 to Mile 13.2 in Chocolate Bayou is inactive. 18. Construction of pile dike was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. 19. Hill Street Bridge to mouth of White Oak Bayou was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. 20. Deepening channel to 40 feet from Southern Pacific Slip to Brady Island was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. 21. The 12-foot channel from mile 1.65 to mile 2.81 is inactive. 22. Complete widening of channel between Port Arthur west turning basin and Taylors Bayou turning basin authorized by 1962 R&H Act. 23. Complete deepening of channel between Port Arthur west turning basin and Taylors Bayou turning basin deauthorized by 1962 R&H Act. 24. Channel extension above Cow Bayou turning basin near Orangefield was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93- 251. 25. Widening to 350 feet entrance channel to Port Arthur turning basin deauthorized by 1962 R&H Act. 26. The 12-foot channel in Sabine River from Orange to Echo, Texas is inactive. 27. Jetty extension inactive. 28. Raising and strengthening of levees surrounding Gulf Oil Company's fresh water reservoir is inactive. 29. Enlarging 7.0 miles of North Fork Taylors Bayou, 7.8 miles of South Fork Taylors Bayou and 4.4 miles of Mayhaw Bayou are inactive. 15-27 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS TABLE 15-C For Last Cost To September 30, 1981 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Aquatic Plant Control (1958 and 1962 River and Harbor Acts)8 1967 38,2521 Bastrop Bayou, Tex. 2 3 1931 9,920 35,3714 Brazos River, Tex., Velasco to Old Washington 3 1924 216,9895 228,4067 Cedar Bayou, Tex. 1975 681,2638 985,5619 Channel to Port Bolivar, Tex. 1980 133,92520 1,035,69221 Clear Creek and Clear Lake, Tex. 1980 66,934 557,19622 Corpus Christi, Tex., Channel to Navy Seaplane Base, Encinal Peninsula8 1968 1,194,344 35,433 10 Dickinson Bayou, Tex. 6 1954 33,942 78,71411 East Bay (Hanna Reef), Tex.12 1922 2,476 87313 Johnson Bayou, La. 6 14 1933 2,261 54,06515 Little Bay, Tex.'s 1979 - 254,474'7 Oyster Creek, Tex. 6 18 1922 6,942 7,58519 Sabine River and Tributaries, Tex. (Echo to Morgan Bluff)3 1971 - 1. Excludes $1,672 work contributions. 13. Includes $26 for reconnaissance surveys. 2. Widening from 60 feet to 100 feet at 4-foot depth 14. Channel adequate for existing commerce. was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. 15. Includes $23 for reconnaissance surveys. 3. Inactive. 16. Aransas County Navigation District, Rockport, 4. Includes $8,242 for reconnaissance surveys. Tex., constructed project as authorized by 1950 River and 5. Includes $123,676 for previous project. Harbor Act (H.D. 114, 81st Cong., 1st sess.) in 1955 under 6. Completed. Department of Army permit. 7. Includes $5,396 for reconnaissance surveys. 17. Includes $1,746 for reconnaissance surveys. 8. Includes $39,087 for previous project. Excludes 18. No commerce reported. $25,000 expended from contributed funds. 19. Includes $29 for reconnaissance surveys. 9. Includes $69,784 for previous projects and $35,380 20. Includes $48,711 for previous projects for reconnaissance surveys. 21. Includes $46,101 for previous projects and $5,064 10. Includes $8,966 for reconnaissance surveys, for reconnaissance surveys. 11. Includes $21,161 for reconnaissance surveys. 22. Includes $39,957 for reconnaissance surveys. 12. In inactive category for maintenance. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS TABLE 15-D For Last Cost To September 30, 1981 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Baytown, Texas' 1980 245,400 - Colorado River, Matagorda, Texas2 1963 273,757 - Guadalupe River (Remove Log Jams), Texas2 1978 505,749 Lavaca-Navidad River, Texas: Hallettsville Project 1961 256,043 - General channel project 1952 21,086 - Liberty Local Protection Project, Texas' 1971 98,517 - Mill Creek, Texas' 1952 24,753 - Peyton Creek, Texas1 1975 66,377 - San Diego Creek, Alice, Texas2 1963 135,175 - Tranquitas Creek, Kingsville, Texas2 1956 130,239 - 1. Inactive. 2. Completed. 15-28 GALVESTON, TEX., DISTRICT TOTAL COST OF EXISTING PROJECTS TO SEPTEMBER 30, 1981 TABLE 15-E See Section in Text Project Funds New Work Maintenance Rehabilitation Total 2. Brazos Island Harbor, Texas 3. Corpus Christi Ship Channel, Texas 5. Freeport Harbor, Texas 6. Galveston Harbor and Channel, Texas 7. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway between Apalachee Bay, Fla. and the Mexican Border (Galveston District) 8. Houston Ship Channel, Texas 11. Sabine-Neches Waterway, Texas 12. Texas City Channel, Texas 13. Trinity River and Tributaries, Texas Regular Public Works Contributed Total cost of project Regular Public Works Contributed Total Value of useful work performed Contributed land Total cost of project Regular Public Works Contributed Total Value of useful work performed Total cost of project Regular Channel Seawall Public works Contributed Total cost of project Regular Public works Contributed Total Value of useful work performed Contributed land Total cost of project Regular Public Works Contributed Total cost of project Regular Public Works Contributed Total Value of useful work performed Contributed land Total cost of project Regular Public works Contributed Total cost of project Regular Contributed Total cost of project $ 8,336,964 2,848,560 1,683,258 12,868,782 39,965,155 324,287 1,467,943 41,757,385 1,716,695 276,720 43,750,800 2,474,249 116,575 758,303 3,349,127 360,249 3,709,376 11,920,187 8,754,209 3,648,932 24,323,328 48,587,602 466,477 1,102,484 50,156,563 395,000 139,776 50,691,339 29,042,293 2,612,932 1,382,760 33,037,985 49,592,331 1,363,652 2,103,435 53,059,418 32,000 116,760 53,208,178 11,971,369 136,296 936,850 13,044,515 25,646,421 66,000 25,712,421 $ 28,255,483 28,255,483 59,801,802 403,442 60,205,244 60,205,244 27,486,943 229,311 27,716,254 27,716,254 52,101,796 166,387 13,121 1,380,210 53,661,514 130,326,592 22,672 130,349,264 130,349,264 75,014,452 163,360 75,177,812 92,467,922 1,514,253 93,982,175 93,982,175 13,229,012 13,229,012 5,395,448 5,395,448 $ 2,170,080 2,170,080 3,576,684 3,576,684 3,576,684 8,935 8,935 8,935 7,373,356 595,973 7,969,329 1,270,511 1,270,511 1,270,511 726,158 726,158 $ 38,762,527 2,848,560 1,683,258 43,294,345 103,343,641 324,287 1,871,385 105,539,313 1,716,695 276,720 107,532,728 29,970,127 116,575 987,614 31,074,316 360,249 31,434,565 71,395,339 9,516,569 13,121 5,029,142 85,954,171 180,184,705 466,477 1,125,156 181,776,338 395,000 139,776 182,311,114 104,056,745 2,612,932 1,546,120 108,215, 797 142,060,253 1,363,652 3,617,688 147,041,593 32,000 116,760 147,190,353 25,926,539 136,296 936,850 26,999,685 31,041,869 66,000 31,107,869 15-29 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 15-F CHANNEL DIMENSIONS Adopted Project Dimensions Improved Project Dimensions See Section in Text Project 2. Brazos Island Harbor, Texas 3. Corpus Christi Ship Channel, Texas 4. Double Bayou, Texas 5. Freeport Harbor, Texas 6. Galveston Harbor and Channel, Texas Section of Waterway Outer Bar and Jetty Channel Padre Island to Long Island Long Island to Goose Island Goose Island to Turning Basin Extension Turning Basin Extension Brownsville Turning Basin Port Isabel Channel via East Turnout West Wye, from Brownsville Channel Port Isabel Turning Basin Fishing Boat Harbor: West Basin Middle Basin East Basin Connecting Channel Entrance Channel Aransas Pass Outer Bar Channel Aransas Pass Jetty Channel Inner Basin at Harbor Island Channel to Port Aransas Port Aransas Turning Basin Anchorage Basin at Port Aransas Inner Basin to Mile 8.5 Mile 8.5 to LaQuinta Junction LaQuinta Junction to Corpus Christi Turning Basin Corpus Christi Turning Basin Industrial Canal Avery Point Turning Basin Channel to Chemical Turning Basin Chemical Turning Basin Tule Lake Channel Tule Lake Turning Basin Viola Channel Viola Turning Basin Channel to LaQuinta LaQuinta Turning Basin Turning Point at LaQuinta Channel Junction Jewell Fulton Canal Jewel Fulton Turning Basin Mooring Area at Ingleside: Mooring Area (a) Mooring Area (b) Double Bayou Channel: Mouth to 7-foot Contour in Trinity Bay West Fork Outer Bar Channel Jetty Channel Quintana Turning Basin Channel to Brazosport Turning Basin Brazosport Turning Basin Channel to Upper Turning Basin Upper Turning Basin Channel to Stauffer Chemical Plant Stauffer Turning Basin Brazos Harbor Channel Brazos Harbor Turning Basin Entrance Channel Outer Bar Channel Inner Bar Channel Anchorage Basin Bolivar Roads Channel Galveston Channel: Bolivar Roads Channel To 43rd St. Depth in Feet (Below Mean Low Tide) 38-36 36 36 36 36 36 36 36 36 15 15 15 15 15 47 45 45 12 12 12 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 12 12 45 45 77 47 45 45 45 45 45 45 30 30 36 36 42 42 40 36 40 40 1,125 Bottom Width (Feet) 300 200 200 300 500 1,000 200 200 1,000 370-305 370-305 370 270 100 700 600-730 730-1,720 100-150 200-400 2 300-400 600-500 500 400 800 400 975 400 1,200 8 300 1,200 300-350 1,200 300-400 1,200 1,250 s 100 200 150 150 125 100 400 400 750 4 400 1,000 4 375 1,200 4 200 500 200 750 4 800 800 800 2,875' 800 125 100 300 200 200-350 744-800 350-375 600 200 500 200 525-675 800 800 800 2,875 800 40 1,125 15-30 Depth in Feet Bottom (Below Mean Width Low Tide) (Feet) 38-36 300 36 200 36 200 36 200 36 500 36 1,000 36 200 36 200 36 1,000 15 370-305 15 370-305 15 370 15 265 15 100 47 700 45 600 45 Irregular 12 100 12 2002 12 300-400 45 600-500 45 500 40-45 400 40 1,000 40 400 40 1,000 40 350 40 1,050 40 200 40 900 40 200-250 40 700-900 45 300-400 45 1,200 45 1,250 3 12 100 12 200 45 150 Length Feet Miles 2.5 2.1 9.6 3.2 1.3 2,670 0.5 1.4 0.8 1,300 0.2 1,470 0.3 1,200 0.2 1,470 0.3 1,230 0.2 770 0.1 1.8 1.0 1,550 - 0.1 200 900 0.2 8.5 3.6 8.6 5,423 1.0 1.1 1,150 0.2 0.6 1,690 0.3 3.1 1,000 0.2 1.8 1,000 0.2 5.6 800 0.1 1,250 0.2 - 0.8 400 0.1 - 0.8 3.9 2.0 - 3.0 - 0.8 - 1.2 667 0.1 - 1.4 600 0.1 - 1.1 500 0.1 - 0.5 675 0.1 - 4.7 - 1.7 - 3.2 - 1.8'1 - 1.0 - 3.9 77 38 36 36 36 36 36 30 25 30 30 42 42 40 36 40 TABLE 15-F (cont) Acdopted Project Dimensions Improved Project Dimensions See Section in Text Project Section of Waterway 8. Houston Ship Channel, Texas 9. Matagorda Ship Channel, Texas 11. Sabine-Neches Waterway, Texas Bolivar Roads to Morgan Point Morgan Point to Boggy Bayou Boggy Bayou to Greens Bayou Greens Bayou to Sims Bayou Hunting Bayou Turning Point Clinton Island Turning Basin Sims Bayou to Southern Pacific Slip Southern Pacific Slip to Houston Turning Basin Houston Turning Basin Upper Turning Basin Brady Island Channel Barbour Terminal Channel Turning Basin Five-Mile Cut Channel Light-Draft Channel: Upper Turning Basin to Jensen Drive Turkey Bend Channel Greens Bayou Channel: Mile 0 to Mile 0.36 Mile 0.36 to Mile 1.57 Outer Bar and Jetty Channel Channel to Point Comfort Approach Channel to Turning Basin Turning Basin Channel to Port Lavaca Lynn Bayou Turning Basin Channel to Harbor of Refuge North-South Basin East-West Basin Channel to Red Bluff Sabine Bank Channel Sabine Pass Outer Bar Channel Sabine Pass Jetty Channel Sabine Pass Anchorage Basin Sabine Pass Channel Port Arthur Canal Entrance to Port Arthur Turning Basins Port Arthur East Turning Basin Port Arthur West Turning Basin Channel connecting Port Arthur West Turning Basin and Taylors Bayou Turning Basin Taylors Bayou Turning Basin Sabine-Neches Canal, Port Arthur Canal to Neches River Turning Point at Mile 19.5 Neches River, Mouth to Maneuvering Area at Beaumont Turning Basin Turning Point, Mile 31.1 Turning Point, Mile 36.6 Turning Point, Mile 40.3 Channel Extension, Mile 40.3 Maneuvering Area at Beaumont Turning Basin Beaumont Turning Basin Beaumont Turning Basin Extension Beaumont Turning Basin Extension to End of Project Channel Vicinity Bethlehem Steel Company Sabine-Neches Canal, Neches River to Sabine River GALVESTON, TEX., DISTRICT CHANNEL DIMENSIONS Depth in Feet (Below Mean Low Tide) 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 36 36 36 10 16 16 8 10 10 36 15 38 36 36 36 12 12 12 12 12 6 42 42 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 36 40 34 34 30 30 Bottom Width (Feet) 400 400 300 300 900-1,00012 80012 300 300 400-1,000 150 60 100 1,100 125 60 60 175 100 300 300-200 6 200-300 1,000 125 27-340 125 300 250 100 800 800 800-500 1,500 500 500 275-678 420 600 200-250 150-1,000 400 9004 400 1,000 4 1,000 4 1,000 4 350 Irregular 500 350 200 200 Depth in Feet (Below Mean Low Tide) 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 36 36 36 10 16 16 8 10 10 36 15 38 36 36 36 12 12 12 12 12 6 42 42 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 36 40 34 34 30 30 Bottom Width (Feet) 400 400 300 300 948-1,00012 965-1,07012 300 300 400-1,000 150 60 100 1,100 125 60 60 175 100 300 300-2006 200-300 1,000 125 27-340 125 300 250 100 800 800 800-500 1,500 500 500 275-678 370-547 350-550 200-250 90-1,233 400 9004 400 1,000 1,000 1,300 350 Irregular 160-535 300 18.3 9 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 15-31 0.7 - 4.4 Length Feet Miles - 26.2 - 12.8 - 2.4 - 5.3 1,375 - 1,592 - - 0.6 - 2.9 3,100 0.6 1,000 0.2 - 0.9 - 1.5 1,000 0.2 - 1.9 - 4.1 - 0.8 - 0.3 - 1.3 - 3.2 - 20.9 - 1.1 1,000 0.2 - 4.1 532 0.1 - 1.9 1,682 0.3 1,750 0.3 - 20.2 - 14.7 - 3.4 - 4.1 3,000 - - 5.6 - 6.2 - 0.3 1,765 0.3 1,610 0.3 - 0.6 3,470 0.7 - 11.2 700 930 1,530 1,265 1,300 1,500 200 200 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 15-F (cont) CHANNEL DIMENSIONS Adopted Project Dimensions Improved Project Dimensions See Depth in Feet Bottom Depth in Feet Bottom Section (Below Mean Width (Below Mean Width Length in Text Project Section of Waterway Low Tide) (Feet) Low Tide) (Feet) Feet Miles Sabine-Neches Sabine River Channel, Mouth Waterway, to Foot of Green Ave. 30 200 30 200 - 9.5 Texas (cont) Orange Turning Basin 30 Irregular 30 Irregular 1,550 0.3 Orange Municipal Slip 30 200 30 150-200 2,435 0.5 Old Channel Around Harbor Island 25 150-200 25 150-200 - 2.4 Channel to Echo7 12 125 - Adams Bayou 12 100 12 100 - 1.7 Cow Bayou 13 100 13 r 100 - 7.0 Orangefield Turning Basin 13 300 13 300 500 0.1 12. Texas City Texas City Channel 40 400 40 400 - 6.8 Channel, Texas Turning Basin 40 1,000-1,200 40 1,000 4,253 0.8 Industrial Barge Canal:8 Channel from Texas City Turning Basin to Mile 1.7 40 300-400 - - - - Turning Basin 40 1,000 - - - - 13. Trinity River Multiple Purpose Channel and Tributaries, to Fort Worth 10 12 200 Texas Channel to Liberty11 9 150 6 100 41.4 Anahuac Channel 6 100 6 100 - 5.8 1. Average. 2. Includes 100-foot channel width. 3. Includes 450-foot channel to Corpus Christi. 4. Diameter. 5. Includes 350-foot channel width. 6. 300-foot width through Matagorda Peninsula. 7. Inactive Category. 8. Channel dredged 34 feet deep by 250-200 feet wide by 9,908 feet long and basin 34 feet deep by 1,000 feet wide by 1,150 feet long by local interests. 9: Included in channel length. 10. Not constructed. 11. 9-foot by 150-foot channel completed from Houston Ship Channel to a point one mile below Anahuac, a distance of 23.2 miles. Upper end not connected to river channel to prevent salt intrusion into river. 12. Includes 300-foot channel width. 15-32 GALVESTON, TEX., DISTRICT GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY APALACHEE BAY, FLORIDA TO MEXICAN BORDER EXISTING PROJECT DIMENSIONS, PROVIDED TABLE 15-G FOR IN TRIBUTARY CHANNELS (See Section 7 of Text) Authorized Improved Project Dimensions Project Dimensions Depth Depth Tributary Channel (Feet Below Bottom (Feet Below Bottom Mean Width Mean Width Length Low Tide) (Feet) Low Tide) (Feet) Miles Feet Offats Bayou Main Channel West Wye Chocolate Bayou Channel 12-Foot Channel via East Turnout West Turnout 9-Foot Channel Turning Basin San Bernard River Channel Colorado River Channel Turning Basin Silting Basin Mouth of Colorado River Navigation Channel, GIWW to Gulf Turning basin at Matagorda Channel to Palacios Turning Basin No. 1 Turning Basin No. 2 Connecting Channel Channel to Barroom Bay Channel to Victoria Main Channel via east Turnout Turning Basin West Turnout Channel Channel to Seadrift via South Turnout Turning Basin North Turnout from Channel to Victoria Harbor of Refuge at Seadrift Channel Basin Channel to Rockport Turning Basin Channel to Aransas Pass Turning Basin Channel to Conn Brown Harbor Conn Brown Harbor Channel to Port Mansfield Entrance Channel Approach Channel to Hopper Dredge Turning Basin Hopper Dredge Turning Basin Channel Across Padre Island and Laguna Madre 12 12 2 12 3 1122 4 9 9 5 9 6 9 99 7 15-12 12 8 12 12 12 12 9 6 9 99 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 14 14 14 14 10o 16 16 16 14 125 12 125 12 125 125 100 600 100 100 400 150 200-100 350 125 200 300 150-480 60 100 600(avg) 100 100 250 100 100 200 200 475 175 300 125 300 250 100 300 100 12 12 9 99 9 12 12 12 12 125 2.3 125 0.4 125 125 100 100 400 150 125 200 300 130-400 100 500(avg) 100 9 9 9 99 14 14 14 14 26 ' 2613 2613 14 100 200 100 200 342(avg) 125-175 300 125 300 250 100 300 100 8.2 0.8 26.0 15.5 0.1 1.0 16.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 34.8 0.1 0.8 2,200 500 635 1,130 4 800(avg) 2.0 - - 230 0.5 - 2.1 0.2 6.1 0.4 0.2 0.3 0.8 0.4 0.1 7.7 - - 1,225 2,212 1,800 300 15-33 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY APALACHEE BAY, FLORIDA TO MEXICAN BORDER EXISTING PROJECT DIMENSIONS, PROVIDED TABLE 15-G FOR IN TRIBUTARY CHANNELS (See Section 7 of Text) Authorized Improved Project Dimensions Project Dimensions Depth Depth Tributary Channel (Feet Below Bottom (Feet Below Bottom Mean Width Mean Width Length Low Tide) (Feet) Low Tide) (Feet) Miles Feet Turnout Channels, East Side of Main Channel, GIWW North Turnout 12 100 12 100 0.6 - South Turnout 12 100 12 100 0.6 - Channel West Side of Main Channel, GIWW, to P.T. of Turnout Channels 14 100 14 100 0.3 - Turnout Channels, West Side of Main Channel, GIWW North Turnout 12 200 12 200 0.6 - South Turnout 12 200 12 200 0.6 - Channel from P.T. of Turnout Channels to Approach Channel to Main Turning Basin 14 125 14 125 0.6 - Approach Channel to Main Turning Basin 14 200 14 200 0.3 - Main Turning Basin 14 400 14 400 0.2 1,250 Turning Basin Extension 14 1,000 14 1,000 0.1 580 Small Craft Basin 8 160 8 160 0.2 860 Shrimp Basin 12 350 12 350 0.3 1,450 Channel to Harlingen via South Turnout From Main Channel, GIWW 12 125 12 125 1 25.8 12 - Turning Basin Near Rio Hondo 12 400 12 400 0.1 500 North Turnout from Main Channel 12 200 12 200 0.7 - Port Isabel Side Channels Main Channel 12 125 12 125-90 0.6 - Main Channel 12 233-60 12 233-60 0.4 - South Leg 12 125 12 125 0.2 - Port Isabel Small Boat Harbor Entrance Channel 7 75 7 75 1.4 - Harbor Channel 6 50 6 50 0.3 - Boat Basin 6 Variable 6 72-501 0.2 1,308 1. Includes the construction of a salt water barrier at wide by 20 to 23-feet deep discharge channel into mile 16.9. 2. Constructed 10 feet deep by 100 feet wide by local interests. East turnout channel constructed 150 feet wide. 3. Constructed by local interests. 4. Authorized to mile 13.2. Mile 8.2 to mile 13.2 is in inactive category. 5. Authorized to mile 31 above mouth (channel mile 29.41). Upper 3.4 miles was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. 6. Includes a discharge channel from Matagorda, Texas, to the gulf which was dredged by local interests in 1939. (Maintenance will be discontinued upon completion of improvements authorized by R&H Act of 1968.) 7. Authorized by R&H Act of 1968. Also provides for a dam across the present discharge channel, a new 250-foot Matagorda Bay, and a 15-foot by 200-foot wide entrance channel with parallel jetties from the gulf shoreline into the Gulf of Mexico. East jetty to be 3,500 feet long and west jetty 2,900 feet long. 8. Includes two protective breakwaters at entrance to turning basins. 9. In the inactive category for maintenance. 10. Also provides for two stone jetties at the gulf entrance about 1,000 feet apart. (North jetty constructed 2,300 feet long and south jetty constructed 2,270 feet long.) 11. South turnout is 200 feet wide. 12. Authorized to mile 31. Mile 25.8 to mile 31 is in inactive category. 13. Dredged 26 feet deep to accommodate U.S. Hopper Dredge A. MACKENZIE. 15-34 GALVESTON, TEX., DISTRICT TABLE 15-H Brazos Island Harbor, Texas (Maintenance) Brownsville Channel July 6, 1981 to September 30, 1981 1,594,779 1,703,867 Corpus Christi Ship Channel, Texas (Maintenance) Jewel Fulton Canal October 1, 1980 to November 21, 1980 54,252 56,518 Main Turning Basin through Viola Turning Basin October 1, 1980 to April 26, 1981 2,763,293 2,340,828 La Quinta Channel and Basin October 10, 1980 to March 24, 1981 3,776,022 2,060,736 Outer Bar Channel (U.S. Hopper Dredge Langfitt) October 1, 1980 to November 16,1980 746,804 1,228,039 Outer Bar and Jetty Channels (U.S. Hopper Dredge McFarland) October 1, 1980 to October 31, 1980 381,796 905,961 Outer Bar and Jetty Channels (U.S. Hopper Dredge Goethals) December 4, 1980 to March 1, 1981 1,970,475 2,708,060 Double Bayou, Texas (Maintenance) Double Bayou Channel July 15, 1981 to August 9, 1981 304,242 313,308 Freeport Harbor, Texas (Maintenance) Outer Bar Channel (U.S. Hopper Dredge McFarland) November 1, 1981 to January 2, 1981 494,160 1,719,350 Gulf Intracoastal Waterway between Apalachee Bay, Fla., and Mexican Border (Galveston District) Port Mansfield Entrance Channel November 6, 1980 to December 3, 1980 302,181 708,490 Port Isabel to GIWW Mile 605 and Tributary Channels October 1, 1980 to May 17, 1981 2,456,423 1,117,984 Freeport Harbor to Cedar Lakes and San Bernard River Channel October 1, 1980 to January 22, 1981 1,320,519 1,728,463 Emergency Dredging Corpus Christi Bay to Mud Flats October 14, 1980 to May 10, 1981 2,984,301 1,912,267 Emergency Dredging Port Isabel to GIWW Mile 610 and Channel to Port Mansfield November 22, 1980 to May 2, 1981 1,843,314 1,794,150 Emetgency Dredging Colorado River to Matagorda Bay March 6, 1981 to August 11, 1981 2,352,633 1,916,600 Turnstake Island to Live Oak Point May 3, 1981 to July 12, 1981 1,568,315 633,960 Port Isabel Small Boat Harbor July 6, 1981 to August 29, 1981 119,113 244,226 Houston Ship Channel, Texas (Maintenance) Greens Bayou to Sims Bayou October 1, 1980 to May 18, 1981 617,166 1,250,639 Redfish Reef to Morgan Point October 1, 1980 to June 21, 1981 3,490,197 2,111,429 Morgan Point to Carpenter Bayou October 1, 1980 to June 15, 1981 2,974,432 3,407,378 Matagorda Ship Channel, Texas (Maintenance) Channel to Red Bluff August 15, 1981 to September 30, 1981 525,988 305,000 Sabine-Neches Waterway, Texas (Maintenance) Upper Reach Neches October 1, 1980 to April 8, 1981 2,562,059 1,720,592 Sabine Pass Outer Bar Channel March 19, 1981 to May 30, 1981 3,589,486 4,039,486 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 15-H (cont) Sabine-Neches Waterway, Texas (Maintenance) Port Arthur Turning Basins and Junction Area and Port Arthur and Sabine-Neches Canal February 20, 1981 to July 19, 1981 2,629,646 1,702,304 Port Arthur Canal August 8, 1981 to September 30, 1981 552,294 431,040 Texas City Channel, Texas (Maintenance) Texas City Turning Basin and Industrial Canal October 1, 1980 to September 30, 1981 441,178 805,150 15-36 GALVESTON, TEX., DISTRICT TABLE 15-I BUFFALO BAYOU AND TRIBUTARIES, TEX. (See Section 18 of Text) Nearest Height of Type of Reservoir Estimated Name City Dam (feet) Structure Capacity Cost Addicks Dam Houston, 49 Earthfill 205,500 acre-feet $5,248,000 Tex. detention Barker Dam Houston, 37 Earthfill 207,000 acre-feet 4,530,000 Tex. detention 15-37 FORT WORTH, TEX., DISTRICT* District includes that portion of Texas south of Red River drainage basin exclusive of drainage basin of Rio Grande and its tributaries above and including Pecos River; exclusive of drainage basins to all short streams arising in coastal plain of Texas and flowing into the Gulf of Mexico, including entire basins of Buffalo Bayou, San Jacinto, San Bernard, Lavaca, Navidad, Mission, and Arkansas Rivers; exclusive of lower basins of major streams flowing into the gulf as follows: Sabine River, Tex. and La., downstream from U.S. Highway 190 crossing at Bon Wier, Tex.; Neches River downstream from Town Bluff gaging station; Trinity River downstream from Texas State Highway 45 crossing at Riverside, Tex.; Brazos River downstream from confluence with Navasota River; Colorado River downstream from gaging station at Austin; Guadalupe River downstream from confluence with San Marcos River; San Antonio River downstream from confluence with Escondido Creek; Nueces River downstream from confluence with Frio and Atascosa Rivers; and exclusive of Agua Dulce, San Fernando, and Olmos Creek basins draining into Baffins Bay and coastal area south thereof to Rio Grande and east of western boundary of Starr County, Tex. District also includes those portions of the Sulphur River and Cypress Creek Watershed located in the State of Texas; that portion of western Louisiana in Sabine River drainage basin upstream from U.S. Highway 190 crossing at Bon Wier, Tex.; and the portion of eastern New Mexico included in drainage basins of Brazos and Colorado Rivers. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Trinity River Project, Tex. ............... Flood Control Aquilla Lake, Tex......... ............ Bardwell Lake, Tex......................... Belton Lake, Tex. ........... ................ Benbrook Lake, Tex................... Big Sandy Lake, Tex................... Canyon Lake, Tex. ................ ......... Cooper Lake and Channels, Tex .......... Duck Creek Channel Improvement, Tex. ... Elm Fork Floodway, Tex. ................. Ferrells Bridge Dam-Lake O' The Pines, Tex. ... .......... .. ................... Grapevine Lake, Tex . ......... ............ G reenville, Tex. ............................. Hords Creek Lake, Tex..................... Lake Brownwood Modification, Tex......... Lakeview Lake, Tex........... ........ Lavon Lake Tex . . ....................... Lavon Lake Modification and East Fork Channel Improvement, Tex.............. Lewisville Dam, Tex....................... M illican Lake, Tex. .......... ............... Navarro Mills Lake, Tex.................... O.C. Fisher Dam and Lake, Tex. ......... Page 16-2 16-2 16-3 16-3 16-3 16-3 16-4 16-4 16-5 16-5 16-5 16-5 16-6 16-6 16-6 16-6 16-7 16-7 16-7 16-8 16-8 16-8 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. 35.. 36. 37. 38. 39. 40. 41. Flood Control (cont) Proctor Lake, Tex . ......................... Ray Roberts Lake, Tex. (Aubrey) ........... San Antonio Channel Improvement, Tex. San Gabriel River, Tex..................... Somerville Lake, Tex................... Stillhouse Hollow Dam, Tex................ Three Rivers, Tex. .......... ................ W aco Lake, Tex.................. ........ Wright Patman Dam and Lake, Tex. ....... Inspection of completed flood control projects. Scheduling flood control reservoir operations.. Other authorized flood control projects ..... Flood control work under special authorization ............ .................... Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power Belton Lake Modification, Tex.............. Dam "A" Lake, Tex.................... Rockland Lake, Tex . ...................... Sam Rayburn Dam and Reservoir, Tex .... Town Bluff Dam-B. A. Steinhagen Lake, Tex.. W hitney Lake, Tex. .......... ............... Page 16-9 16-9 16-9 16-9 16-10 16-10 16-10 16-11 16-11 16-11 16-11 16-12 16-12 16-12 16-12 16-12 16-12 16-12 16-13 General Investigations 42. Surveys ............ ....................... 16-13 43. Collection and study of basic data .......... 16-13 * All cost and financial statements for projects are listed text and also appear at the end of this chapter. at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in 16-1 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 Navigation 1. TRINITY RIVER PROJECT, TEX. The project authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1965 (H. Doc. 276, 89th Cong., 1st Sess.) consists of five major components: Multiple-Purpose Channel, Tennessee Colony Lake, Dallas Floodway Extension, West Fork Floodway, and Water Conveyance Facilities. For the last full report on the project as authorized, see Annual Report of 1978. The project information present herein is based on the tentatively selected project plan presented in the Draft General Design Memorandum. The plan consists of three structural components: Dallas Floodway Extension, Tennessee Colony Lake, and a Multiple-Purpose Channel in the lower basin. The estimated cost of the improvements is $1,053,000,000 including $68,000,000 non- Federal cost for land acquisition and relocation required for the local protection features. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning continued. MULTIPLE-PURPOSE CHANNEL: Location. The Multiple-Purpose Channel begins at the Houston ship channel, crosses the bay area in an easterly direction to intersect the existing Double Bayou channel turns northward along the coastline to Wallisville Lake and then continues northward through the lake area along the course of the Trinity River to 4-1/2 miles above Liberty, Texas. Existing project. The navigation portion of the channel will have a width of 200 feet with a depth of 12 feet and will extend from the Houston ship channel in Galveston Bay to the port of Liberty, Texas. The flood control portion of the channel will have a bottom width of 320 feet with a depth of 30 feet, and will extend from Wallisville Lake to 4-1/2 miles above Liberty, Texas. Estimated Federal cost of the improvements is $138,000,000. Local cooperation. Local interests are required to: (a) provide, without cost to the Federal Government, all lands, easements and rights-of-way required for construction, operation and maintenance of the project, (b) accomplish, without cost to the Federal Government, all relocations and alterations to existing improvements, other than highway bridges over new land cuts and railroad bridges required for the construction of the project, (c) maintain and operate the flood control portion of the channel upstream of Liberty, Texas, and (d) reimburse the Federal Government for one-half of the separable costs allocated to recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement. This reimbursement is presently estimated at $208,000, exclusive of interest. TENNESSEE COLONY LAKE: Location. The Tennessee Colony dam site is located at river miles 341.7 on the Trinity River about 22 miles west of Palestine, Texas. The lake extends into Freestone, Anderson, Henderson, and Navarro Counties. Existing project. The plan of improvement provides for the construction of an earthfilled dam with a maximum height of 123 feet above the streambed and a total embankment length of 42,350 feet with a gated concrete spillway. The lake will have a total controlled storage of 3,455,000 acre-feet and a water surface area of 114,400 acres at the top of the flood control pool and 68,100 acres at the top of the conservation pool. The total storage includes 2,269,500 acre-feet for flood control, 1,040,000 acre-feet for conservation, and 145,500 acre-feet for sediment reserve. Estimated Federal cost of the improvement is $788,000,000. Local cooperation. Local interests are required to reimburse the Federal Government for costs allocated to water supply storage and one-half of the separable cost allocated to recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement. This reimbursement is presently estimated at $398,832,000 for water supply and $8,044,000 for recreation (excluding future recreation facilities), for a total cost of $406,876,000, exclusive of interest. DALLAS FLOODWAY EXTENSION: Location. Dallas Floodway Extension is located on the Trinity River in the city of Dallas, Dallas County, Texas. Existing project. The plan of improvement provides for enlargement and realignment of the Trinity River from the existing Dallas Floodway downstream approximately 9 miles to the confluence of the Trinity River and Five Mile Creek. The enlargement and realignment of three tributary channels for a total distance of about 10.5 miles through the leveed areas. Construction of a parallel levee system through the lower areas consisting of about 10.2 miles along the left bank, 14.6 miles along the right bank of the main and diversion channels with a minimum distance of 2,000 feet between levees along the main channel. The estimated Federal cost is $59,000,000 and estimated non-Federal cost is $53,000,000 for a total estimated cost of $112,000,000 for the improvement. Local cooperation. Local interests are required to: (a) provide, without cost to the Federal Government, all lands, easements and rights-of-way necessary for construction, maintenance and operation of the project, (b) accomplish, without cost to the Federal Government, all alterations to existing improvements, other than railroad bridges required for the construction of the project, (c) maintain and operate the project after completion, and (d) reimburse the Federal Government for one-half of the separable costs allocated to recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement. This reimbursement is presently estimated at $1,639,000 (excluding future recreation) exclusive of interest. Flood Control 2. AQUILLA LAKE, TEX. Location. On Aquilla Creek in Hill County, Tex., with the dam at river mile 23.3, about 6.8 miles southwest of Hillsboro, Tex., and about 24.0 miles north of Waco, Tex. (See U.S. Geological Survey maps, Aquilla and Peoria, Tex., quadrangle scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. Plan of improvement provides for an earthfill dam 104.5 feet high and 11,800 feet long with an uncontrolled concrete spillway 1,200 feet long on the left abutment, creating a lake with a total storage capacity of 146,000 acre-feet, including 86,700 acre-feet for flood control, 33,600 acre-feet for water supply, and 25,700 acrefeet for sediment reserve. Drainage area above damsite is 294 square miles. Estimated cost is $50,000,000. Local cooperation. The Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, and the Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965 and Section 221, Flood Control Act of 1970 apply. A contract with the Brazos River Authority for water supply storage was approved by the Secretary of the Army, 29 June 1976. Operations and results during fiscal year. Acquisition of real estate and construction continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was started March 1977, with award of contract for relocation of FM Road 310. Contract for Initial Embankment, Partial 16-2 FORT WORTH, TEX., I)ISTRICT Spillway Excavation, and Outlet Works was awarded 5 June 1978, and is continued. Contract for relocation of FM Road 1947 awarded 11 September 1980 continues. A contract for Completion of Embankment and Spillway and Construction of Services Bridge, Access Roads, Project Buildings, Visitors Center Overlook, FM-310 and other Appurtenances was awarded 21 January 1981. Contract for Boundary Fencing, Part 1, was awarded 7 August 1981, as was contract for Sanitary Facilities, Boat Ramp and Parking awarded 24 June 1981. Relocation of Hill County Road Contract, Part II, was awarded 18 September 1981. 3. BARDWELL LAKE, TEX. Location. Dam is on Waxahachie Creek, 5 river miles upstream from its confluence with Chambers Creek, a tributary of the Trinity River, and about 5 miles south of Ennis, Ellis County, Tex. Extisting project. For a description of completed improvement and authorizing act see Annual Report of 1969. Estimated cost of project is $12,941,000. Local cooperation. Local interests must reimburse the Federal Government for costs allocated to increased water supply storage under the terms of the Water Supply Act of 1958. In Contract approved by the Secretary of the Army on 24 June 1963 the Trinity River Authority, a State agency, agreed to fulfill all requirements of local cooperation. To date the authority has paid $154,681 toward principal and $211,974 toward annual cost of operation and maintenance of project, including cost of operating 10-foot conduit. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Benefits accrued to Bardwell project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through fiscal year 1981 were $8,659,700. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of project was started August 1963 and completed for beneficial use in November 1965. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. 4. BELTON LAKE, TEX. Location. Dam is on Leon River about 16.7 miles above confluence of Leon and Lampasas Rivers and about 3 miles north of Belton, Tex. (See Geological Survey base map, scale 1:500,000 and Geological Survey, Belton sheet, scale 1:62,500.) Existing project. For a description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report for 1962. Estimated cost of project is $18,410,000. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. A contract with Brazos River Authority, a State agency, for remaining water supply storage in reservoir was approved by Secretary of the Army on 15 January 1958, at an estimated cost of $1,602,822. To date $745,747 has been paid. Under the contract Brazos River Authority must also pay annually 11.2 percent of actual annual cost of operation and maintenance. To date $695,093 has been paid. An interim contract with Brazos River Authority for emergency use of water supply storage in project was approved by Secretary of the Army on 2 January 1957. Amount of $152,435 paid by authority on 21 March 1957 for use of these facilities was credited to interest and principal payable under formal water supply contract. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Recreation facilities under Code 710 regular were constructed. Benefits accrued to Belton project: Accumulated damages prevented through fiscal year 1981 were $105,983,100. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction started June 1949 and project was ready for beneficial use in March 1954. Raising water supply pool: Construction started in July 1970 and the pool raise is complete. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. 5. BENBROOK LAKE, TEX. Location. Dam is in Tarrant County, Tex., on Clear Fork of Trinity River 15 river miles upstream from its confluence with West Fork of Trinity River about 10 miles southwest of downtown Fort Worth, Tex. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report for 1962. Estimated cost of project is $14,544,000. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. No water supply storage is included in project. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Construction of recreation facilities under Code 710 continued including recreation facilities under a cost-sharing contract with the City of Benbrook, Texas. Benefits accrued to system consisting of Benbrook Lake and Fort Worth Floodway: Accumulated flood damages prevented through fiscal year 1981 are estimated at $40,603,500. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of project was started May 1947 and ready for beneficial use in September 1952. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. 6. BIG SANDY LAKE, TEX. Location. The project is located on Big Sandy Creek, a tributary of the Sabine River, and is virtually contained in Wood County, with a small area extending into Upshur County. The damsite is located at river mile 15.3 about 6 miles northwest of Big Sandy, Texas. Existing project. The project provides for construction of an earth and rock fill dam with a maximum height of 94.5 feet above streambed and a total length of 6,200 feet, including the concrete spillway. Big Sandy Lake would have a total controlled storage of 418,200 acre-feet and a water surface area of 16,580 acres at elevation 382.0, top of flood control pool. At elevation 367.5, top of conservation pool, the lake would have an area of 10,810 acres and a storage capacity of 221,200 acre-feet. Project was authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1970 (PL 91-611) substantially in accordance with recommendations as outlined in House Document No. 91-429 (91st Congress) and is a unit in the comprehensive basin-wide plan of water resource development. Estimated cost of project is $99,100,000. Local cooperation. Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, and the Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965 apply. The Sabine River Authority of Texas and the Texas Water D)evelopment Board are the local project sponsors. 16-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 Operations and results during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning studies were continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Preconstruction planning is 26 percent complete. 7. CANYON LAKE, TEX. Location. Dam is on Guadalupe River, 303 miles above its mouth, and about 12 miles northwest of New Braunfels, Comal County, Tex. Existing project. For a description of completed improvement and authorizing act see Annual Report of 1969. Estimated cost of project is $21,732,000, including $1,400,000 contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. Local interests (Guadalupe-Blanco River Authority) will utilize water impounded for water supply and streamflow regulation for development of electric power. In a formal contract approved by Chief of Engineers on 24 October 1957, Guadalupe-Blanco River Authority agreed to fulfill all requirements of local cooperation. Required contribution of $1,400,000 was made in full by Guadalupe-Blanco River Authority. In addition, $22,848 was contributed for installation and operation of reservoir leakage gages. Under the contract the authority must pay 34.8 percent of actual annual cost of operation and maintenance. To date $691,030 has been paid. Operations and results during fiscal year. Regular funds: Routine operation and maintenance continued. Benefits accrued to Canyon project: Accumulated damages prevented through fiscal year 1981 were $49,624,100. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction started April 1958 and project completed for beneficial use June 1964. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. 8. COOPER LAKE AND CHANNELS, TEX. Location. Cooper Dam and Reservoir is about 4 miles southeast of Cooper, 13 miles north of Sulphur Springs, Tex., and is at mile 23.2 on South Sulphur River, which rises in Fannin County, Texas, and flows generally east for about 80 miles to its confluence with North Sulphur River to form Sulphur River. Existing project. Provides for construction of an earthfill dam with maximum height of about 73 feet, 15,882 feet long at its crest, one controlled (service) spillway, and an emergency uncontrolled spillway. Reservoir surface area will be 22,740 acres at top of flood control pool, 5,084 acres at top of sediment pool, and 19,305 acres at top of water supply pool. The reservoir will contain 131,400 acre-feet of flood control storage space, 273,000 acre-feet of municipal and industrial water supply space, and 37,000 acre-feet of sediment storage. Also provides for channel clearing, realignment, and enlargement; enlargement and extension of existing levees; and construction of appurtenant drainage works along main stem of Sulphur River above mile 126; channel clearing, realignment, and enlargement and levee enlargement and modification of appurtenant drainage works on Cuthand Creek below mile 24, on Sulphur River below mile 70, except in proposed Cooper Reservoir, mile 29 to 42, and on Middle Sulphur River below mile 8 channel clearing and realignment of Brushy Creek below mile 5; and levee enlargement on North Sulphur River between mile 1 and 5. Estimated Federal cost for new work (October 1980) is $169,000,000, which includes $67,683,000 to be reimbursed by water supply users over a 50-year period and $227,000 non-Federal cost for lands for the levees. Local cooperation. Except for Cooper Reservoir, local interests must furnish lands and rights-of-way, and alter and relocate highways and related facilities and utilities, except railroads, for construction; hold and save the United States free from damages; maintain and operate all works after completion, and preserve channel capacities by preventing encroachment. Local agencies furnished rights-of-way for first two phases of work on levees and channels downstream from Cooper Dam. Right-of-way acquisition for part II, for channels and levees downstream from Cooper Dam is essentially complete, except for that required below mile 140.4, Sulphur River (Magnolia Pipeline Crossing). Right-of-way acquisition for this portion of project is inactive pending resolution of a controversy among local interests as to the responsibility for relocation of the pipeline. Assuring Agencies are the following counties in Texas: Delta, Hunt, Franklin, Lamar, Morris, Hopkins, Titus, and Red River. Basic assurances have been received. Supplemental assurances covering Public Law 91-646 have not been received from Delta, Lamar, Morris, or Hunt Counties. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preparation of a Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement, real estate administration within the reservoir, and negotiations with cooperating agencies were continued by hired labor. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of project began July 1958 and is 27 percent complete, with 14.8 miles of South Sulphur River and 6.3 miles of Middle Sulphur River channels excavated; and 3.4 miles of levee embankment on South Sulphur River and 7.3 miles of levee embankment constructed on Middle Sulphur River, all upstream from Cooper Reservoir. About 10.5 miles of levee on North Sulphur River, 8.2 miles of levee on Sulphur River, 14 miles of levee on Cuthand Creek, and 4.2 miles of levee on Brushy Creek were strengthened; 0.5 mile of levee on Kickapoo Creek was enlarged; and 15.3 miles of new channel in Cuthand Creek, 0.8 mile of new channel in Brushy Creek, and 0.2 mile of cutoff channel in Kickapoo Creek were excavated; all downstream from Cooper Reservoir. Modification of Texas and New Orleans Railroad Company's trestle 93.77, Middle Sulphur River, was completed August 1959, and modification of St. Louis Southwestern Railway Company's trestles 533.74 and 542.61, South Sulphur River, January 1960. Approximately 98 percent of the lands for the reservoir have been acquired. Lack of funds and spending limitations prevented construction of the levees and channel between April 1964 and February 1971. On 10 February 1971, a contract was awarded for construction and rectification of approximately 23 miles of levee and 33 miles of channel improvement and realignment of the Sulphur River. In May 1971, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, acting on a motion for preliminary injunction halted further construction until an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) was prepared. A Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) was filed on 24 June 1977. The plan recommended in the FEIS minimized further construction of the authorized channels, and provided for construction of the reservoir and downstream levees. In November 1977, a trial brief was filed in the United States District Court challenging the sufficiency of 16-4 FORT WORTH, TEX., DISTRICT the FEIS. On 8 December 1978, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas cited 5 deficiencies in the FEIS and halted all further construction. A Supplemental EIS to comply with Court's decision was prepared. The final Supplemental EIS was released by OCE on 18 March 1981. The assistant U.S. Attorney will initiate legal proceedings to have the Supplemental EIS reviewed by the court. This project transferred to the Fort Worth District as of the end of the fiscal year 1979. 9. DUCK CREEK CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, TEX. Location. In Garland, Dallas County, Texas on Duck Creek, a tributary of the Trinity River between river mile 10.4 and 17.5. Existing project. Provides for realignment and enlargement of 6.6 miles of channel improvement consisting of concrete walls, modification of drainage facilities, 2 railroad bridges, 9 street bridges and relocation of all utilities. Estimated Federal cost of these modifications is $9,000,000 and estimated cost to local interests is $6,500,000, a total of $15,500,000. Existing project was authorized by River and Harbor Act of 1965 in House Document 276, 89th Congress, 1st Session. Local cooperation. Local interests must provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements and rightsof- way necessary for construction, and all alterations and relocations of existing buildings, utilities, bridges (except railroad bridges), sewers, pipelines, and any other existing improvements; hold the United States free from damages due to the construction work, operate and maintain all features after completion of the project. Operations and results during fiscal year. No construction was accomplished. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction started in June 1972, and the project is 4 percent complete. Construction has been suspended pending local interests providing items required for local cooperation. Action to reclassify the project to inactive status was initiated in March 1980. 10. ELM FORK FLOODWAY, TEX. Location. The project is located in Dallas and Denton Counties, Texas. A portion of the improvement will be in and adjacent to the cities of Dallas, Irving and Farmers Branch, Texas. Existing project. Improvement of the Elm Fork of the Trinity River from the mouth to Lewisville Dam and along Denton Creek, a tributary of the Elm Fork to Grapevine Dam. The plan of improvement provides for enlargement and realignment of about 22 miles of the Elm Fork, enlargement and realignment of about 20 miles of tributary channels, construction of about 39 miles of new levee, rehabilitation of about 2 miles of existing levees, modification of 14 street and highway bridges, 4 railroad bridges and alteration of utilities. Estimated Federal cost of these modifications is $51,400,000, and non-Federal estimated cost is $73,800,000, a total of $125,200,000. Project was authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1965 (H. Doc. 276, 89th Cong. 1st Sess.) Local cooperation. Local interests are required to provide (without cost to the Federal Government) except for the main channel thereof, all lands, easements, utilities and bridge relocations (except railroad bridges) necessary for construction and operation of the project. Assurances were signed 20 March 1969 by the Trinity River Authority, a State agency, that they would provide items required of local interests.. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning was suspended in 1973. Further studies have been delayed until a definite plan has been accepted by local interests. Condition at end of fiscal year. Preconstruction planning is suspended. 11. FERRELLS BRIDGE DAM-LAKE O' THE PINES, TEX. Location. On Cypress Creek in Marion, Harrison, Upshur, Morris, Camp, and Titus Counties, Tex., 8 miles west of Jefferson, Tex. Existing project. An earth-fill dam 10,600 feet long and 77 feet high includes a 200-foot spillway with a capacity of 68,200 cubic feet per second. Reservoir controls runoff from 850 square miles of drainage area, and has a gross storage capacity of 842,100 acre-feet, including 587,200 acre-feet flood control storage, 3,800 acre-feet conservation storage, and 251,100 acre-feet for municipal and industrial water supply. Reservoir extends 28 miles upstream. Project affords substantial flood protection of Cypress Creek Valley from damsite to confluence with Red River and, together with operation of other reservoirs proposed in Red River Basin, will provide flood protection along main stem of Red River below Denison Dam. Estimated cost of project is $17,231,700 Federal. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Benefits accrued to Ferrells Bridge Dam-Lake O' The Pines project: Accumulated damages prevented through fiscal year 1981 were $6,139,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction commenced in January 1955 and was completed in June 1960. Recreation facilities under Code 710 regular remain. This project transferred to the Fort Worth District as of the end of fiscal year 1979. 12. GRAPEVINE LAKE, TEX. Location. Dam is in Tarrant County, Tex., on Denton Creek, 11.7 river miles upstream from its confluence with Elm Fork of Trinity River and about 20 miles northwest of city of Dallas, Tex. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing act see Annual Report for 1962. Estimated cost of project is $18,896,000, including $2,040,000 contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. A contract with Dallas County Park Cities Water Control and Improvement District No. 2 for 50,000 acre-feet of water supply storage was approved by Secretary of the Army on 21 March 1955. Park Cities paid the required $607,000. A contract with city of Dallas for 85,000 acre-feet of water supply storage was approved by Secretary of the Army on 17 March 1954. Dallas paid the required $1,433,026. A Contract with city of Grapevine, Tex., for 1,250 acre-feet of water supply storage was 16-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 approved by Secretary of the Army on 14 September 1953, at an estimated cost of $22,654. To date Grapevine has paid $22,654. Above contracts include payment of operation and maintenance costs as follows: Dallas County Park Cities Water Control and Improvement District No. 2, a pro rata part of the actual annual cost, which part to be not less than $2,000 nor more than $3,000; Dallas, 9.2 percent of actual annual cost; and Grapevine, its pro rata part of actual annual cost (estimated at $79.55 annually and included in total annual payment). Following operation and maintenance payments have been made: Park Cities $87,939, Dallas $371,077, and Grapevine $1,591. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Recreation facilities under Code 710 regular were continued. Benefits accrued to system comprised of Lewisville Lake, Grapevine Lake and Dallas Floodway: Accumulated flood damages prevented through fiscal year 1980 were $424,684,700. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of project was started December 1947 and ready for benefical use in July 1952. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. 13. GREENVILLE, TEX. Location. In Greenville, Hunt County, Tex. on Long Branch of the Sabine River. Existing project. Provides for realignment and enlargement of 3.34 miles of improved channel along Long Branch. Estimated Federal cost is $848,000, and estimated cost to local interests was $259,000, a total of $1,107,000. Existing project was authorized by the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1970 in House Document 91-429, 91st Congress, 2nd Session. Local cooperation. Local interests must provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements and rightsof- way necessary for construction, and all alterations and relocations of existing buildings, utilities, bridges (except railroad), sewers, pipelines and any other existing improvements; hold the United States free from damages due to construction work; and operate and maintain all features after completion of the project. Operations and results during fiscal year. Local interests acquired necessary items of local cooperation. The construction of the improved channel was completed. A cost-sharing contract for Hike and Bike Trails was awarded to the City of Greenville. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the improved channel is complete. Recreation facilities remain. 14. HORDS CREEK LAKE, TEX. Location. On Hords Creek, a tributary of Pecan Bayou, about 13.5 miles west of Coleman, Tex., and about 27.8 miles upstream from mouth of Hords Creek. (See Geological Survey sheets, Grosvenor and Zephyr, scale 1:62,500.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report for 1962. Estimated cost of project is $4,337,000 including $105,000 contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Benefits accrued to Hords Creek project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through fiscal year 1981 were $937,200. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of project was started January 1947 and completed for beneficial use in April 1948. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. 15. LAKE BROWNWOOD MODIFICATION, TEX. Location. The dam will be located at river mile 57 on Pecan Bayou, a tributary of the Colorado River, eight miles north of Brownwood, Texas. The lake will be located in Brown and Coleman counties. Existing project. The project will insure the safety of the existing non-Federal Lake Brownwood and preserve its flood control, water supply, and related values. Modification measures consist of a new embankment 130 feet high and 1,870 feet long, new outlet works, and erosion control measures in the spillway channel. The total controlled storage of the existing lake is 118,900 acrefeet including 85,900 acre-feet for water supply and 33,000 acre-feet for sediment reserve. Storage capacity will not be altered by this project. The modification project was authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1968 (P.L. 90-483) substantially in accordance with recommendations of the Chief of Engineers as contained in House Document No. 90-350. Estimated cost of project is $29,480,000 including $20,000,000 non-Federal cost. Local cooperation. Water Supply Act of 1958 and Section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 apply. Brown County Water Improvement No. 1 is the local sponsor. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning suspended pending proposed legislation prepared by the Department of the Army to deauthorize the project. Condition at end of fiscal year. Preconstruction planning is complete. 16. LAKEVIEW LAKE, TEX. Location. Dam site is located at river mile 11.2 on Mountain Creek, a right bank tributary of the West Fork of the Trinity River, and is adjacent to the city limits of Grand Prairie, Dallas County, Texas, which is one of the rapidly growing cities in the Dallas-Fort Worth metropolitan area. Existing project. The project provides for construction of an earthfill dam with a maximum height of 108.5 feet above the streambed and a total length of 24,200 feet, including a 50-foot uncontrolled ogee type spillway, which will control 232 square miles of drainage area. The reservoir will have a total controlled storage of 304,000 acre-feet and a water surface area of 10,940 acres at the top of the flood control pool and 7,470 acres at the top of the conservation pool. The total storage includes 123,100 acre-feet for flood control, 142,900 acre-feet for conservation and 38,000 acre-feet for sediment reserve. Estimated cost of the project is $229,639,000 including $9,639,000 non-Federal first cost. Project was authorized by River and Harbor Act of 1965 (H. Doc. 276, 89th Cong., 1st Sess.), and is a unit in the general comprehensive plan 16-6 FORT WORTH, TEX., DISTRICT for development and control of the water resources of the Trinity River basin. Local cooperation. The Water Supply Act of 1958 as amended, and the Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965 apply. Contracts for water supply storage and recreation with the Trinity River Authority was approved by the Secretary of the Army, 15 June 1977. Reimbursement is currently estimated at $52,711,000 for supply and $11,693,000 for recreation (excluding future recreation facilities) for a total of $64,404,000 exclusive of interest. Operations and results during fiscal year. Real Estate acquisition and construction continue. Condition at end of fiscal year. Real Estate acquisition was initiated in August 1977. Construction was started in December 1978 with award of contract for relocation of FM Road 1382. A construction contract for Outlet Works and Initial Embankment was awarded 19 November 1979. A contract for Boundary Fencing, Part 1, was awarded 2 June 1981, and is 45 percent complete. Award of contract for Completion of Embankment, Spillway and Outlet Works was made 30 September 1981. Real Estate acquisition, construction of FM Road 1382, and engineering and design continued. 17. LAVON LAKE, TEX. Location. Dam is in Collin County, Tex., on East Fork of Trinity River 55.9 miles above its confluence with Trinity River and about 22 miles northeast of Dallas, Tex. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report for 1962. Estimated cost of project is $15,470,000. For information concerning Lavon Lake Modification and East Fork Channel Improvement project, see individual project. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. A contract with North Texas Municipal Water District for water supply storage, including cost of intake structure, was approved by Secretary of the Army 8 July 1954, at an estimated cost of $1,405,753. Contract was revised in 1973 and final revised contract amount is $1,445,261.67. To date the district has paid $522,661. Under the contract North Texas Municipal Water District must pay annually 13.6 percent of actual annual cost of operation and maintenance. To date the district has paid $411,309. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Benefits accrued to Lavon project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through fiscal year 1980 were $54,098,900. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of project was started January 1948 and ready for beneficial use in September 1953. Project is complete. See following section for Lavon Lake Modification and East Fork Channel Improvement authorized by Flood Control Act of 1962. 18. LAVON LAKE MODIFICATION AND EAST FORK CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, TEX. Location. Existing dam is in Collin County, Tex., on East Fork of Trinity River, 55.9 miles above its confluence with Trinity River and about 22 miles northeast of Dallas, Tex. Channel improvement of East Fork extends from its mouth to river mile 31.8. Existing project. Reservoir modification provides for raising top of existing dam from elevation 502.0 to 514.0 and lengthening existing dam from about 9,499 feet to about 19,493 feet; modification of existing concrete spillway structure; enlargement of existing reservoir area, involving acquisition of additional rights-of-way; relocation and alteration of highways, county roads, railroads and utilities; and provision of recreational facilities. East Fork Channel and floodway improvements consist of 25 miles of channel enlargement and straightening of the East Fork between river mile 0.0 and 31.8; replacement of inadequate levee-sluice structures; rehabilitation of existing levees; acquisition and clearing of land areas as required for rights-of-way along improved channel and existing levees; alteration of existing railroad, highway and county road bridges crossing the improved channel as well as relocation of existing utility lines; and strengthening and raising about 202,400 linear feet of levees of seven existing levee districts. Reservoir will provide a total storage capacity of 748,200 acre-feet (275,600 are for flood control, 380,000 for water supply storage, and 92,600 for sedimentation reserve.) Estimated Federal cost of the modification and improvement is $69,750,000 and estimated cost to local interests is $220,000 for lands and damages and relocations, a total of $69,970,000. Local cooperation. Local interests must reimburse the Federal Government for costs allocated to increased water supply storage under the terms of the Water Supply Act of 1958. The North Texas Municipal Water District has contracted for 43 percent of the water supply (approved 22 September 1967 by the Secretary of the Army) and to date $768,654 has been paid. North Texas Municipal Water Supply District has submitted assurances to contract for the 57 percent for future water supply. Reimbursement is currently estimated at $33,518,000. Levee Districts 4 and 5, which comprise the lower 10 miles of the East Fork Channel, entered into agreements as required by section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 on 28 January 1972 and have furnished all necessary construction easements. Levee Districts 6, 8, 10, 13, and 15, which comprise the upper 15 miles of the East Fork Channel, have declined to provide the necessary assurances. On 8 December 1972, this portion of the project was reclassified from "active" to "inactive" category. Operations and results during fiscal year. A construction contract for improving the lower ten miles of the East Fork Channel was awarded 30 March 1979 and a contract for Levee Improvement, Increment I, East Fork was awarded 1 May 1981. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was initiated in May 1970 and ready for beneficial use in December 1975. Improvement of the lower ten miles of the East Fork Channel and Levees is 86 percent complete and total project is 98 percent complete. 19. LEWISVILLE DAM, TEX. Location. In Denton County, Tex. on Elm Fork of Trinity River 30 river miles above its confluence with Trinity River and about 22 miles northwest of city of Dallas, Tex. at a site downstream from old Garza Dam. 16-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report for 1962. Estimated cost of project is $27,527,000 including $3,677,000 contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. A contract with city of Dallas for 415,000 acre-feet of water supply storage and rights and interests to Garza Dam and Reservoir was approved by the Secretary of the Army on 16 July 1953. Local contributions have been made in full. A contract with city of Denton, Tex., for remaining 21,000 acre-feet of water supply storage was approved by the Secretary of the Army on 20 May 1954, with an estimated cost of $250,064. To date Denton has paid $250,064. Under above contracts, cities of Dallas and Denton must pay annually 21.9 and 1 percent, respectively, of actual annual cost of operation and maintenance. To date Dallas has paid $1,255,869 and Denton $69,087. Operations and results during fiscal year. Major rehabilitation of the existing embankment continued. Rehabilitation consists of upstream and downstream stability berms. Estimated Federal cost is $6,580,000. A construction contract for the upstream berm was awarded 12 June 1979 and is complete. Contract for Modification of Embankment of Downstream Berms was awarded 6 March 1981. Benefits accrued to system comprised of Lewisville Lake, Grapevine Lake, and Dallas Floodway: Accumulated flood damages prevented through fiscal year 1981 were $424,684,700. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of project was started November 1948 and ready for benefical use in November 1954. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. The construction contract for the upstream berm is complete and construction downstream is 74 percent complete. 20. MILLICAN LAKE, TEX. Location. Dam is on the Navasota River at mile 24.1, approximately 7 miles north of Navasota, Texas in Grimes and Brazos Counties, Texas. This project would be the first of a two-stage development consisting of Millican and Navasota Dams, both of which would be units in the overall plan of improvement for the Brazos River Basin. Existing Project. The project provides for construction of a concrete and earthfill dam 25,300 feet long including a 472-foot gate-controlled spillway. Without Navasota Lake in operation, the top of flood control pool (elevation 234.0) would provide 1,557,400 acre-feet of storage space and cover a surface area of 66,000 acres. There would be 784,800 acre-feet of flood control; 680,200 acre-feet for water supply (surface area 42,400 acres), and 92,400 acrefeet for sediment reserve. With Navasota Lake in operation, the top of flood control elevation and total storage would remain the same. The flood control pool would be 359,600 acre-feet, water supply storage would be 1,125,800 acre-feet (surface area 55,500 acres) and sediment reserve would be 72,000 acre-feet. Estimated Federal cost of the project is $264,000,000. The project was authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1968, Public Law 90-483, House Document 341, 90th Congress, 2nd Session. Local cooperation. The Water Supply Act of 1958 as amended and the Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. By letter dated December 9, 1974, the Brazos River Authority stated that they would be the state agency to cost share for both water supply and recreation. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Preconstruction planning 63 percent complete. 21. NAVARRO MILLS LAKE, TEX. Location. Dam is in Navarro County, Tex., at river mile 63.9 on Richland Creek, a tributary of Trinity River, about 16 miles southwest of Corsicana, Tex. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorization acts see Annual Report for 1965. Estimated cost of project is $12,704,000 including $300,000 contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. The Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended applies. A formal contract with the Trinity River Authority was approved 3 March 1966, by the Secretary of the Army at an estimated cost of $2,260,800. To date the Authority has paid $461,038 for water supply and $489,754 for operation and maintenance. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Benefits accrued to Navarro Mills project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through fiscal year 1981 were $25,576,900. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction started December 1959 and project completed for beneficial use March 1963. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. 22. O. C. FISHER DAM AND LAKE, TEX. Location. Dam is on North Concho River, a tributary of Concho River, about 6.6 miles above mouth of North Concho River near city of San Angelo, Tex. (See Geological Survey base map, Texas, scale 1:500,000, and sheet Wall, scale 1:62,500.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report for 1962. Name was changed from San Angelo Dam and Reservoir 3 January 1975 by Public Law 93-634. Estimated cost of project is $17,111,000. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. A water-supply contract with Upper Colorado River Authority for water-supply storage in reservoir was approved by Secretary of the Army on 11 October 1948. The Authority has contributed $860,444 toward cost of project and $64,324 toward operation and maintenance for a 50-year period. The Authority must pay additional consideration of $1 a year for useful life of project, beginning 1 January 1965. Operations and results during fiscal year. Regular funds: Routine operation and maintenance continued. Benefits accrued to O. C. Fisher Dam & Lake project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through fiscal year 1981 were $2,375,600. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of project was started May 1947 and ready for beneficial use February 1952. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. 16-8 FORT WORTH, TEX., DISTRICT 23. PROCTOR LAKE, TEX. Location. Dam is at river mile 238.9 on Leon River, a tributary of Brazos River, about 8 miles northeast of Comanche in Comanche County, Tex. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorization act see Annual Report of 1969. Estimated cost of project is $16,249,000. Local cooperation. The Water Supply Act of 1958 applies. A formal contract with the Brazos River Authority, a State agency, was approved by Secretary of the Army, 1 July 1960, and was modified and was approved 9 May 1966, at an estimated cost of $1,707,900. To date the Authority has paid $235,384 for water supply and $178,679 for operation and maintenance. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance were continued. Benefits accrued to Proctor project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through fiscal year 1981 were $5,166,700. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of project was started July 1960 and completed for beneficial use 1963. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. 24. RAY ROBERTS LAKE, TEX. (formerly Aubrey Lake) Location. Damsite is located at river mile 60.0 on the Elm Fork of the Trinity River, Denton County, between Sanger and Aubrey, Texas and 30 miles upstream from Lewisville Dam. Existing project. The plan of improvement provides for construction of an earthfilled dam with a maximum height of 141 feet above the streambed, a length of 15,250 feet including an uncontrolled broadcrested spillway 100 feet long, controlling 682 square miles of drainage area. The lake will have a total controlled storage of 1,064,600 acre-feet, with a water surface area of 36,900 acres. The total storage includes 260,800 acre-feet for flood control, 749,200 acre-feet for water supply, and 54,600 acre-feet for sediment reserve. Estimated Federal cost of the project is $286,100,000. Project was authorized by River and Harbor Act of 1965 (H. Doc. 276, 89th Cong., 1st Sess.) Public Law 96-384, 96th Congress, H.R. 8024, effective 4 January 1981, changed the name of Aubrey Lake to Ray Roberts Lake. Local cooperation. The Water Supply Act of 1958 as amended and the Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965 and Section 221, Flood Control Act of 1970 apply. Contracts with the cities of Dallas and Denton, Texas, for water supply storage and recreation were approved by the Secretary of the Army 16 September 1980. Operations and results during fiscal year. Acquisition of real estate continues. Condition at end of fiscal year. Real estate acquisition is approximately 2 percent complete. 25. SAN ANTONIO CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, TEX. Location. Floodway is in city of San Antonio, Bexar County, Tex., on San Antonio River and San Pedro, Apache, Alazan, and Martinez Creeks. Existing project. Provides for clearing, widening, deepening, and straightening about 31 miles of river and creek channels to carry standard project flood discharges, construction of channel walls, and paving, conduit, and construction and alteration of railroad bridges. Estimated Federal cost of these modifications is $70,900,000 and estimated cost to local interests is $80,600,000 which includes $1,900,000 cash contributions and $78,700,000 for lands, damages, and construction, a total of $151,100,000. Existing project was authorized by 1954 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 344, 83d Cong., 2d Sess.). Latest published map is in project document. The Water Resources Act of 1976 added authorization to the existing project for construction of flood control measures needed to preserve and protect the Espada Acequia Aqueduct located in the vicinity of Six Mile Creek. Local cooperation. Local interests must furnish lands and rights-of-way for construction, including purchase and removal of buildings, relocation or reconstruction of bridges (exclusive of railway bridges), channel dams where applicable, and utility lines; hold the United States free from damages; maintain and operate all works after completion; and provide a cash contribution for enhancement benefits of 2.65 percent of actual Federal construction cost. San Antonio River Authority furnished assurances that it will comply with all requirements of local cooperation. These assurances were accepted by the District Engineer on 15 April 1957. To date $786,200 has been contributed by San Antonio River Authority. In addition, $30,000 has been contributed and accepted, under the authority of Civil Functions Appropriations Act of 1958, for vehicular crossings over the San Antonio channel. Operations and results during fiscal year. Contract for Espada Aqueduct Flood Protection Unit 9-1, Six Mile Creek, awarded 10 July 1979, is complete. Construction contract for Channel Improvement, Schedule I, Unit 8.3-2 was awarded 14 September 1981, and a contract for Channel Paving, Unit 8-3-1, Schedule II was awarded 28 September 1981. Engineering and design studies continued. Benefits accrued to San Antonio project: Accumulated damages prevented through fiscal year 1981 were $44,055,500. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was started in October 1957 and the project is about 42 percent complete. 26. SAN GABRIEL RIVER, TEX. Location. System of three reservoirs in Williamson County in the central portion of Brazos River Basin. Granger Dam at river mile 31.9 on San Gabriel River, about 7 miles east of Granger, Tex.; North San Gabriel Dam at river mile 4.3 on North Fork of San Gabriel River, about 3.5 miles northwest of Georgetown, Tex.; and South Fork Dam at river mile 4.7 on South Fork of San Gabriel River, about 3 miles southwest of Georgetown, Tex. Existing project. Granger Lake was authorized by 1954 Flood Control Act, and North (North San Gabriel Dam and Lake Georgetown) and South Fork Lakes were authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act. Estimated total Federal cost of project is $146,000,000. Plan of improvement provides for the following: Granger: An earthfilled dam 16,320 feet long, with maximum height of 115 feet above streambed, which controls 709 square miles of drainage area. Reservoir provides a total storage capacity of 244,200 acre-feet, of which 162,200 acre-feet are 16-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 for flood control, 37,900 acre-feet for water supply storage, and 44,100 acre-feet for sediment reserve. Estimated cost of project is $61,850,000. North San Gabriel Dam: A rockfill dam 5,950 feet long with maximum height of 164 feet above streambed, which controls 246 square miles of drainage area. Reservoir provides a total storage capacity of 130,800 acre-feet, of which 87,600 acre-feet are for flood control, 29,200 acre-feet for water supply storage, and 14,000 acre-feet for sediment reserve. Estimated cost of project is $39,500,000. South Fork: A rockfill dam 5,620 feet long with maximum height of 152 feet above streambed, which controls 123 square miles of drainage area. Reservoir provides a total storage capacity of 82,600 acre-feet (45,700 for flood control, 28,900 for water supply storage, and 8,000 for sediment reserve). Estimated cost of project is $44,650,000. Public Law 96-575, 96th Congress, H. R. 4941 effective 4 January 1981, changed the name of North Fork Lake to North San Gabriel Dam and Lake Georgetown. Local cooperation. Construction is subject to condition that local interests reimburse the Federal Government for costs allocated to water supply at Granger, Lake Georgetown, and South Fork Lakes. Reimbursement currently estimated at $12,865,000 for Granger, $6,311,000 for Lake Georgetown, and $13,221,000 for South Fork, for a total of $32,397,000 exclusive of interest. Brazos River Authority, a State agency, is the local interests' sponsor of project, and by letter dated 18 April 1966, indicated its acceptance of the proposed plan of development and its willingness to pay for the costs allocated to water supply in each reservoir in the ultimate plan. Such water supply assurances for Granger and Lake Georgetown Lakes were approved 24 May 1968 as satisfactory in accordance with requirements of the Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended. Contract negotiations for South Fork Lake will be deferred until the need for water supply develops and the reservoir is scheduled for construction. Operations and results during fiscal year. Construction, real estate activities and engineering and design continued at Granger and Lake Georgetown. Deliberate impoundment of water commenced at Granger and Lake Georgetown Lakes on 21 January 1980 and 3 March 1980, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was started in October 1972. Granger and Lake Georgetown Lakes are about 96 percent complete. Granger and Lake Georgetown Lakes were ready for beneficial use in January 1980 and March 1980, respectively. 27. SOMERVILLE LAKE, TEX. Location. Dam is on Yegua Creek 20 miles upstream from its confluence with Brazos River and about 2 miles south of Somerville, Tex. Existing project. For description of completed improvements and authorization act see Annual Report of 1969. Estimated cost of project is $30,227,000. Local cooperation. The Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, applies. A contract with the Brazos River Authority, a State agency, for water supply storage was approved 10 May 1962, by the Secretary of the Army, at an estimated cost of $4,871,815. Also under the contract, the authority must pay annually 28.655 percent of the actual annual cost of operation and maintenance. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Construction of recreation facilities under a contract with the State of Texas, under Code 710 cost-sharing continued. Benefits accrued to Somerville project: Accumulated damages prevented through fiscal year 1981 were $30,354,700. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction started in June 1962 and project was ready for beneficial use in January 1967. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. 28. STILLHOUSE HOLLOW DAM, TEX. Location. Dam is on Lampasas River 16 miles upstream from its confluence with Little River, a tributary of the Brazos River, and about 5 miles southwest of Belton, Tex. Existing project. For description of completed improvements and authorization act see Annual Report of 1969. Estimated cost of project is $23,670,000. Local cooperation. The Water Supply Act of 1958 applies. A contract with the Brazos River Authority, a State agency, for water supply storage was approved 13 April 1962, by the Secretary of the Army, at an estimated cost of $6,912,430. To date the Authority has paid $581,691. Also under the contract the Authority must pay annually 27.748 percent of the actual annual cost of operation and maintenance. To date the Authority has paid $225,018. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Recreation facilities under Code 710 regular were constructed. Benefits accrued to Stillhouse Hollow Project: Accumulated estimate of flood damages prevented through fiscal year 1981 is $20,596,800. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was initiated in July 1962 and the project was ready for beneficial use in February 1968. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. 29. THREE RIVERS, TEX. Location. The project is located in and adjacent to the city of Three Rivers, Live Oak County, Texas, midway between San Antonio and Corpus Christi, Texas, on the left bank of the Frio River, two miles below the mouth of the Atascosa River and two miles above the confluence with the Nueces River. Existing project. The local flood protection project consists of an earthfill levee 5.1 miles in length and appurtenant water control measures. The project was authorized in 1971 under Section 201 of the 1965 Flood Control Act in accordance with the recommendations of the Chief of Engineers as contained in House Document 92-153. Estimated cost of the project is $6,363,000 including $473,000 non-Federal cost. Local cooperation. The city of Three Rivers, Texas, gave assurances satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army that they will: (a) Provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and borrow areas necessary for construction, maintenance, and operation of the project; (b) Provide without cost to the United States all bridge relocations, except railroad bridges, and all buildings, structures, and any other alterations of existing structures or improvements which may be required for 16-10 FORT WORTH, TEX., DISTRICT construction of the project; (c) Hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction of the project; (d) Acquire without cost to the United States, easements on lands adjacent to the city to allow flooding on some lands not now in the flood plain, and hold and save the United States free from claims as a result of this additional flooding; (e) Provide assurances that encroachment on interior and exterior drainage and ponding areas will not be permitted without offsetting the encroachment by substitute storage or equivalent pumping capacity, without cost to the United States; (f) agree to publicize flood plain information in the area concerned and to provide this information to zoning and other regulatory agencies and public information media for their guidance and appropriate action, including adoption of such regulations as may be necessary to insure compatibility between future developments and protection levels provided by the project; and (g) Maintain and operate all works after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army. The assurances were accepted by the Federal Government 26 July 1979. Operations and results during fiscal year. A contract for construction of levees and floodwalls was awarded 20 March 1981. Land acquisition, utility relocations, and engineering and design continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Land acquisition and relocations by local sponsor are complete. 30. WACO LAKE, TEX. Location. Dam is on Bosque River, 4.6 river miles above its confluence with Brazos River, at city of Waco, McLennan County, Tex. Existing project. For description of completed improvements and authorization act see Annual Report of 1969. Estimated cost of project is $50,853,000 including $250,000 contributed by local interests and $2,500,000 other non-Federal cost. Local cooperation. Section G of the Flood Control Act of December 1944 applies. A contract with the Brazos River Authority, a State agency, for water supply storage and the contract with the city of Waco transferring the existing Lake Waco to the Government for their water supply storage, was approved by the Secretary of the Army on 15 April 1958. To date the Authority for their portion of the water supply storage has paid $1,100,133. Also under the contract the Authority and the City must pay 14.607 and 2.087 percent respectively of the actual cost of operation and maintenance. To date the Authority has paid $447,656 and the City has paid $75,867. Operations and results during fiscal year. Regular funds: Routine operations and maintenance continued. Benefits accrued to Waco project: Accumulated damages prevented through fiscal year 1981 were $58,731,900. Condition at end of fiscal year.Construction was started in July 1958, and project was ready for beneficial use in February 1965. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. 31. WRIGHT PATMAN DAM AND LAKE, TEX. Location. On Sulphur River in Cass and Bowie Counties, Tex. Dam is 45 miles above mouth of Sulphur River, and about 8 miles southwest of Texarkana, Tex. Existing project. An earth-fill dam 18,500 feet long and 100 feet high, including a spillway 200 feet wide and outlet works with a capacity of 27,600 cubic feet per second. Reservoir controls runoff from 3,400 square miles of drainage area, and has a storage capacity of 2,654,300 acre-feet, of which 145,300 acre-feet are for conservation and remainder for flood control. Estimated cost for new work (October 1978) is $51,945,000 which includes $5,449,100 Code 711, $399,939 accelerated public works funds, and $13,138,004 to be reimbursed by local interests, over a period not to exceed 50 years, for water supply storage, and including $1,997,604 for pro rata share of original reservoir cost. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Benefits accrued to Wright Patman project: Accumulated damages prevented through fiscal year 1981 were $13,697,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was initiated in August 1948 and completed in March 1962, except real estate activities, construction under Code 711, and conversion of 120,000 acre-feet to water supply storage after completion of Cooper Reservoir. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Recreation facilities under Code 710 regular continue. This project transferrred to the Fort Worth District as of the end of fiscal year 1979. 32. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspection of completed local flood protection projects is made periodically in compliance with section 208.10 of title 33, Code of Federal Regulations, which contains regulations for operation and maintenance of local floodprotection works approved by Secretary of the Army in accordance with authority in section 3, Flood Control Act of 22 June 1936. See Table 16-D) for inspections made this fiscal year. Inspection costs for fiscal year from regular funds for maintenance were $39,857. Total costs to 30 September 1981 were $421,465. 33. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS In accordance with Flood Control Act of 1944 expenditures were made for scheduling flood control reservoir operations and preparation of reservoir regulation manual for Mjarshall Ford Dam, on the Colorado River, near city of Austin, Tex., and for preparation of reservoir regulation manual for Twin Buttes Dam, on Middle and South Concho Rivers near city of San Angelo, Tex. Marshall Ford Dam was authorized by 1937 River and Harbor Act. Project was constructed jointly by Bureau of Reclamation and Lower Colorado River Authority and was completed during fiscal year 1942. Twin Buttes Reservoir was authorized for construction by Department of Interior by Public Law 152, 85th Congress. Construction was initiated in June 1960; closure of dam started in June 1962; deliberate impoundment was started 23 January 1963. Accumulated damages prevented by Marshall Ford Reservoir through fiscal year 1981 were $139,745,600. 16-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 During filling stage Twin Buttes Reservoir will consist of two separate pools, one on South Concho River and the other on Middle Concho River and Spring Creek. Equalizing channel between these two pools is at elevation 1925.0. Costs for fiscal year from regular funds for maintenance were $144,996. 34. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 16-C.) 35. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization) Fiscal year costs were: Banita-Lanana Creeks, $496; Dry Devils Draw, $8,975; Edgecliff Branch - Edgecliff, $19,345; Edgecliff Branch - Fort Worth, $7,210; Parker Creek, $21,184; Pecan and Cooper Creeks, $160,677; Post Oak Creek, $131; Roscoe, Texas, $27,691; South Nolan Creek, $2,187; Ten Mile Creek, $4,163; Waco Creek, $3,061; Walnut Creek, $22; West Mud Creek, $12; Zacate Creek, $1,623,719. Emergency flood control, hurricane-flood, and shore protection activities (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation) Fiscal year costs were $31,025 for advance preparation. Multi-Purpose Projects Including Power 36. BELTON LAKE MODIFICATION, TEX. Location. For location of completed dam see Belton Lake, Tex. in this chapter. Existing project. The modification of Belton Lake to provide installation of hydroelectric power generating facilities was authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1954 (H.Doc. 535, 81 st Cong., 2nd Sess.). The plan of improvement provides for reallocation of the gross storage capacity in Belton Lake to provide a power pool and the installation of hydroelectric power generating facilities. Condition at end of fiscal year. The modification is classified as deferred until the Chief of Engineers determines it is advisable. 37. DAM A LAKE, TEX. Location. The dam would be located approximately 18 miles west of Jasper and about 4 miles west of Horger, Tex. Existing project. The project is designed to be used as a run-of-river plant for the generation of power and to reregulate power surges from the proposed Rockland Lake. The last estimate of project cost was $3,220,000 in 1954. For last full report see Annual Report of 1952. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is classified as deferred. The study was reactivated to determine if project is economically feasible. 38. ROCKLAND LAKE, TEX. Location. The dam would be located approximately 3 miles west of Rockland, Texas, on the Neches River. Existing project. The project would control floods, generate hydroelectric power, and provide water supply for various uses. The last estimate of project cost was $46,300,000 in 1954. For the last full report see Annual Report of 1952. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is classified as deferred. The study was reactivated to determine if project is economically feasible. 39. SAM RAYBURN DAM AND RESERVOIR, TEX. Location. Dam is on Angelina River 25.2 miles upstream from its confluence with Neches River and about 10 miles northwest of Jasper, Tex. Existing project. For description of completed improvements and authorization act see Annual Report 1969. Estimated cost of project is $68,683,000 including $3,000,000 contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. A contract with the Lower Neches Valley Authority, a State agency, to contribute $3,000,000 toward the first cost and an additional $200,000 annually for 50 years after completion of the project was approved by the Secretary of the Army on 22 January 1957. Contribution of $3,000,000 was made in full and annual payments to date of $3,000,000 have been made by the Authority. A contract with the City of Lufkin for water supply storage was approved 27 May 1969 by the Secretary of the Army at an estimated cost of $525,600. To date the City has paid $70,715. Also under the contract the City of Lufkin must pay annually 0.692 percent of the annual cost of operation and maintenance. To date the City has paid $49,457. Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued routine operation and maintenance. Recreation facilities under Code 710 were constructed. Benefits accrued to Sam Rayburn project: Accumulated damages prevented through fiscal year 1981 were $47,684,200. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was started August 1956 and project was ready for beneficial use in March 1965. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. 40. TOWN BLUFF DAM-B. A. STEINHAGEN LAKE, TEX. Location. Dam is on Neches River about 12.4 miles below mouth of Angelina River, one-half mile north of Town Bluff, Tex., and 93 river miles north of Beaumont, Tex. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report for 1962. Estimated cost of project is $9,888,000, including $2 million contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. Completed as required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Regular funds: Routine operation and maintenance continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction started March 1947 and project was ready for beneficial use in April 1951. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. Studies began to determine the feasibility of modifying the existing project to incorporate hydropower. 16-12 FORT WORTH, TEX., DISTRICT 41. WHITNEY LAKE, TEX. Location. Dam is on Brazos River, about 442 miles above mouth of river, 5.5 miles southwest of Whitney, Tex., and about 38 miles upstream from city of Waco, Tex. (See Geological Survey sheets: Waco, Cleburne and Granbury scale 1:125,000, and Whitney, Blum, and Morgan, scale 1:62,500.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report for 1962. Estimated cost of project is $46,306,000. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued routine operation and maintenance. Benefits accrued to Whitney project: Accumulated damages prevented through fiscal year 1981 were $124,516,200. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of project was started June 1946 and ready for flood control use in December 1951. First power was placed on-the-line in June 1953. Raise power pool is complete. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. General Investigations 42. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs were $53,870 for navigation studies, $1,069,728 for flood damage prevention studies, $107,705 for coordination with other agencies, and $411,706 for preauthorization studies Phase I for a total of $1,643,009. 43. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Work was continued under the Flood Plain Management Services on the compilation of information on floods and potential flood damages, including identification of those areas subject to inundation. Fiscal year expenditures for these activities totaled $1,607,157. Fiscal year costs were $1,036 for hydrologic studies. The national program of inspection of dams, authorized by Public Law 92-367, was continued in Fiscal Year 1981. Expenditures under this program for inspection of dams were $1,353,489 and for inventory of dams were $17,122, comprising a total of $1,370,611. 16-13 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 16-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost To in Text Project Funding FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 Sept. 30, 1981 1. Trinity River New Work: Project, Tex. Approp. 1,250,000 1,000,000 840,000 700,000 21,439,866 Cost 1,456,999 1,016,390 516,712 680,184 21,096,471 2. Aquilla Lake, Tex. New Work: Approp. 3,055,000 4,875,000 6,242,000 8,425,000 29,157,300 Cost 2,966,426 5,418,361 5,731,069 7,226,026 27,397,323 3. Bardwell Lake, Tex. New Work: Approp. - - - - 10,934,505 Cost - - - - 10,934,505 Maint. Approp. 738,700 968,200 515,900 666,800 6,035,087 Cost 737,154 927,136 515,502 704,472 5,993,083 4. Belton Lake, Tex. New Work: Approp. 60,600 162,000 2,563 7,010 16,831,645 Cost 151,817 193,499 3,345 6,850 16,831,4851 Maint. Approp. 829,600 1,244,600 686,700 702,200 8,781,103 Cost 838,691 1,048,737 828,738 750,667 8,755,764 5. Benbrook Lake, Tex. New Work: Approp. 100,000 239,300 1,531 13,000 13,057,286 Cost 183,345 131,436 147,789 17,813 13,038,2382 Maint. Approp. 688,300 1,125,600 487,500 767,400 8,576,355 Cost 680,883 839,385 781,720 784,450 8,565,847 6. Big Sandy Lake, Tex. New Work: Approp. - 75,000 350,000 250,000 675,000 Cost - 74,910 311,826 275,431 662,167 7. Canyon Lake, Tex. New Work: (Federal Funds) Approp. - - (-)3,600 - 19,088,5243 Cost 72,898 - (-)3,600 - 19,088,524 Maint. Approp. 608,800 679,300 585,900 624,400 6,726,684 Cost 606,486 669,616 613,781 620,445 6,719,179 8. Cooper Lake and New Work: Channels, Tex. Approp. 3,400,000 (-)561,000 350,000 400,000 21,953,000 Cost 1,836,502 680,192 677,824 288,535 21,805,659 9. Duck Creek Channel New Work: Improvement, Tex. Approp. - - (-)44,000 (-)29,600 536,695 Cost - (-)17,073 (-)27,550 (-)28,978 536,695 10. Elm Fork Floodway, New Work: Tex. Approp. - - - - 662,400 Cost - - - - 662,400 11. Ferrells Bridge Dam New Work: Lake O' The Pines, Tex. Approp. - (-)2,192 (-)2,165 - 14,175,1974 Cost 141,552 13,014 - - 14,175,197 6 Maint. Approp. 1,048,000 1,230,000 1,066,900 1,483,100 11,257,367 Cost 1,186,532 857,672 1,023,979 975,229 10,300,229 12. Grapevine Lake, Tex. New Work: Approp. 32,000 17,410 - - 9,967,790 Cost 127,031 18,968 - - 9,967,7907 Maint. Approp. 824,300 1,176,204 774,900 814,700 9,946,618 Cost 825,892 959,222 1,011,242 807,839 9,924,381 13. Greenville, Tex. New Work: Approp. 541,000 - - 49,000 896,900 Cost 700,682 42,202 1,297 50,774 880,241 16-14 TABLE 16-A See Section in Text Project 14. Hords Creek Lake, Tex. 15. Lake Brownwood Modification, Tex. 16. Lakeview Lake, Tex. 17. Lavon Lake, Tex. 18. Lavon Lake Modification & East Fork Channel Improvement, Tex. 19. Lewisville Dam, Tex. 20. Millican Lake, Tex. 21. Navarro Mills Lake, Tex. 22. O. C. Fisher Dam and Lake, Tex. 23. Proctor Lake, Tex. FORT WORTH, TEX., DISTRICT COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Toa Cos To Total Cost To Funding FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 Sept. 30, 1981 New Work: Approp. - 109,250 (-)528 - Cost - 108,407 315 - Maint. Approp. 332,800 443,900 376,300 328,300 Cost 320,462 430,224 388,095 347,437 New Work: Approp. 15,000 - -- Cost 10,541 13,667 8 - New Work: Approp. 16,930,000 18,145,000 19,785,000 19,689,000 Cost 19,521,996 18,178,789 19,460,419 18,677,800 - - 309,000 - - 276,544 936,900 904,800 962,900 969,655 902,713 883,200 1,165,500 6,900,000 2,601,000 1,401,220 6,729,155 2,716,402 724,900 2,300,000 1,775,000 732,522 2,059,628 1,989,569 1,374,150 1,017,000 991,100 1,082,487 1,187,391 1,171,036 - 300,000 490,000 1,581 294,536 418,158 (-)5,660 24,000 - (-)5,660 23,947 53 754,500 577,100 621,500 678,118 630,573 659,377 (-)7,600 - - (-)7,079 - - 664,600 617,300 420,800 618,743 617,011 469,500 - - 7,000 - - 7,000 616,500 507,600 514,700 568,837 578,781 518,437 New Work: Approp. - Cost - Maint. Approp. 952,000 Cost 992,668 New Work: Approp. (-)1,500,000 Cost 175,562 New Work: Approp. 198,400 Cost 200,391 Maint. Approp. 1,043,400 Cost 1,062,309 New Work: Approp. 67,000 Cost 195,220 New Work: Approp. - Cost 131 Maint. Approp. 678,700 Cost 689,820 New Work: Approp. - Cost 104,461 Maint. Approp 380,600 Cost 422,011 New Work: Approp. - Cost - Maint. Approp. 466,600 Cost 489,770 24. Ray Roberts Lake, Tex. New Work: Approp. 600,000 (-)1,000,000 (-)425,000 5,500,000 Cost 133,022 60,523 667,048 5,363,835 39. Sam Rayburn Dam New Work: and Reservoir, Tex. Approp. - 112,000 (-)5,813 3,000 Cost 2,061 103,578 2,608 2,557 Maint. Approp. 1,350,600 1,660,500 1,471,700 3,838,500 Cost 1,505,864 1.591.894 1,524,529 1,706,868 2,711,0898 2,711,089 4,290,259 4,271,952 840,000 840,000 79,964,000 78,540,468 12,837,700 12,805,244 9,665,509 9,569,635 67,087,862 67,030,352 23,364,579 23,331,3570 11,953,241 11,936,49410 3,010,000 2,932,692 9,840,088 9,840,08811 6,325,105 6,311,229 16,027,467 16,027,467 6,275,155 6,269,425 14,416,585 14,416,585 5,627,672 5,617,081 9,794,700 9,316,789 60,583,256 60,582,81312 19,338,994 17,158,225 16-15 TABLE 16-A REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Project 25. San Antonio Channel Improvement, Tex. (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 26. San Gabriel River, Tex. Granger North Fork 27. Somerville Lake, Tex. 28. Stillhouse Hollow Dam, Tex. 29. Three Rivers, Tex. 40. Town Bluff Dam- B. A. Steinhagen Lake, Tex. 30. Waco Lake, Tex. 41. Whitney Lake, Tex. 31. Wright Patman Dam and Lake, Tex. Funding FY 78 New Work: Approp. 300,000 Cost 1,444,848 New Work: Contrib. 34,450 Cost 34,450 New Work: Approp. 11,921,000 Cost 14,725,545 Maint. Approp. - Cost - Maint. Approp. - Cost - New Work: Approp. 200,000 Cost 283,463 Maint. Approp. 663,600 Cost 673,776 New Work: Approp. 341,000 Cost 331,973 Maint. Approp. 591,500 Cost 678,798 New Work: Approp. - Cost 83,162 New Work: Approp. - Cost - Maint. Approp. 482,300 Cost 588,469 New Work: Approp. 248,000 Cost 243,824 Maint. Approp. 741,000 Cost 730,575 New Work: Approp. - Cost - Maint. Approp. 1,377,700 Cost 1,424,696 New Work: Approp. 350,000 Cost 127,423 Maint. Approp. 1,066,000 Cost 1,124,252 16-16 Total Cost To FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 Sept. 30, 1981 920,000 2,570,000 1,150,000 29,668,045 1,080,730 2,563,224 937,593 29,424,656 - - 96,450 786,200 - - 65,250 755,000 8,000,000 12,826,000 1,607,000 97,172,100 9,524,145 12,372,988 1,758,823 96,791,370 102,896 319,700 668,100 1,090,696 - 406,430 621,982 1,028,412 89,596 274,200 591,300 955,096 - 353,927 567,067 920,994 576,400 6,566 134,990 27,515,775 567,830 202,076 146,313 27,488,203 1,746,100 837,700 990,700 8,396,547 1,310,493 1,291,207 978,203 8,379,537 (-)5,000 (-)220 - 20,504,044'3 3,807 - - 20,504,044 871,600 650,300 768,800 5,951,726 734,091 718,939 742,189 5,839,876 112,500 115,000 2,000,000 2,721,500 78,092 - 1,878,478 2,450,445 - - - 6,602,737 - - - 6,602,737'4 472,700 472,500 541,700 7,113,914 466,637 470,173 528,612 7,081,964 16,000 - - 49,521,1211s 20,176 - - 49,521,121 768,000 820,400 778,200 7,937,426 812,154 817,001 782,059 7,929,067 110,000 14,813 128,000 42,971,349 15,193 108,737 103,337 42,945,80316 1,725,604 1,494,000 1,434,400 18,113,080 1,797,633 1,425,105 1,447,788 18,026,655 (-)1,094 (-)1,146 - 35,690,626 250,168 31,450 - 35,690,626 1,145,000 884,700 808,000 13,167,790 979,843 988,791 854,738 13,038,691 FORT WORTH, TEX., DISTRICT TABLE 16-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost To in Text Project Funding FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 Sept. 30, 1981 1. Excludes $47,309 receipts from reconveyance of land, deposited to miscellaneous receipts. 2. Excludes $322,346 receipts from reconveyance of land deposited to miscellaneous receipts. 3. Excludes $1,422,848 expended for new work from contributed funds, including $22,848 "Contributed Funds Other" for installation and operation of gages for leakage study. 4. Includes $1,378,486 for Code 711, $52,808 for Code 713, and $399,739 accelerated Public Works Act funds. Excludes $1,711,200 contributed funds. 5. Includes $1,376,322 for Code 711, $52,808 for Code 713, and $399,739 accelerated Public Works Act funds. Excludes $4,137 reimbursed in Fiscal Year 1973. 6. Claim Northeast Texas Municipal Water District $16,546. Three payments of $12,410 less real estate charges of $1,325, making a total of $2,811 reimbursed in Fiscal Year 1972, Fiscal Year 1973, and Fiscal Year 1974. 7. Excludes $146,795 receipts from reconveyance of land deposited to miscellaneous receipts, and $2,040,026 for new work expended from contributed funds. 8. Excludes $105.079 expended from contributed funds. 9. Excludes receipts from reconveyance of land of $426,606 which were deposited to miscellaneous receipts, and $3,676,661 for new work expended from contributed funds. 10. Includes $130,000 under appropriation 96X5125. 11. Excludes $300,000 expended from contributed funds. 12. Excludes $3 million expended from contributed funds. 13. Includes receipts from disposals and revocation of funds related thereto. 14. Excludes $2,000,000 contributed funds expended. 15. Excludes $2,750,000 expended for contributed funds. 16. Excludes $188,282 receipts from reconveyance of lands deposited to miscellaneous receipts. 16-17 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 16-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents 13 August 1968 31 March 1960 24 July 1946 3 September 1954 2 March 1945 31 December 1970 2 March 1945 3 September 1954 3 August 1955 2 March 1945 27 October 1975 27 October 1965 24 July 1946 2 March 1945 31 December 1970 18 August 1941 AQUILLA LAKE, TEXAS (See Sec. 2 of Text) Construction of a dam on Aquilla Creek, about 6.8 miles southwest of Hillsboro, Texas and about 24 miles north of Waco, Texas. BARDWELL LAKE, TEXAS (See Sec. 3 of Text) Construction of a dam on Waxahachie Creek about 5 miles south of Ennis, Texas. BELTON LAKE, TEXAS (See Sec. 4 of Text) Construction of a dam on the Leon River about 3 miles north of Belton, Texas. Modification (see Sec. 36 of Text) of the dam to provide for generation of hydroelectric power. BENBROOK LAKE, TEXAS (See Sec. 5 of Text) Construction of a dam on the Clear Fork of the Trinity River about 10 miles southwest of Fort Worth, Texas. BIG SANDY LAKE, TEXAS (See Sec. 6 of Text) Construction of a dam on Big Sandy Creek about six miles northwest of Big Sandy, Texas. CANYON LAKE, TEXAS (See Sec. 7 of Text) Construction of a dam on the Guadalupe River about 12 miles northwest of New Braunfels, Texas. COOPER LAKE AND CHANNELS, TEXAS (See Sec. 8 of Text) Construction of earth-fill dam and reservoir area; channel clearing, realignment, and enlargement; enlargement and extension of existing levees; construction of appurtenant drainage works along main stem of Sulphur River above mile 126; channel clearing, realinement, and enlargement and levee enlargement and modification of appurtenant drainage works on Cuthand Creek below mile 24, on Sulphur River below mile 70, except in proposed Cooper Reservoir, miles 29 to 42, and on Middle Sulphur River below mile 8; channel clearing and realignment of Brushy Creek below mile 5; and levee enlargement on North Sulphur River between miles 1 and 5. DAM "A" LAKE, TEXAS (See Sec. 37 of Text) Construction of a dam on the Neches River about 18 miles west of Jasper, Texas. DUCK CREEK CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, TEXAS (See Sec. 9 of Text) Realignment and enlargement of about 7 miles of Duck Creek in the urban area of Garland, Texas. ELM FORK FLOODWAY, TEXAS (See Sec. 10 of Text) Realignment and enlargement of the Elm Fork of the Trinity River and Denton Creek, and a parallel levee system from the existing Dallas levee system upstream to near the Dallas and Denton county lines. FERRELLS BRIDGE DAM-LAKE O' THE PINES, TEXAS (See Sec. 11 of Text) Provides for construction of an earth-fill dam and reservoir area. GRAPEVINE LAKE, TEXAS (See Sec. 12 of Text) Construction of a dam on Denton Creek, a tributary of the Trinity River, about 20 miles northwest of Dallas, Texas. GREENVILLE LOCAL FLOOD PROTECTION (See Sec. 13 of Text) Realignment and enlargement of Long Branch, a tributary of the Sabine River, in the city of Greenville, Texas. HORDS CREEK LAKE, TEXAS (See Sec. 14 of Text) Construction of a dam on Hords Creek, a tributary of Pecan Bayou, near the city of Coleman, Texas. S. Doc. 52, 90th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 424, 82nd Cong, 2nd sess. H. Doc. 88, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 535, 81st Cong., 2nd seas. H. Doc. 403, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 429, 91st Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 247, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 488, 83d Cong., 2nd sess. S. Doc. 98, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 276, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 276, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 602, 79th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 91-429, 91st Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 91-429, 91st Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 370, 76th Cong., slet sess. 16-18 FORT WORTH TEX., DISTRICT TABLE 16-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents 13 August 1968 27 October 1965 2 March 1945 23 October 1962 7 March 1974 2 March 1945 13 August 1968 3 September 1954 31 December 1970 18 August 1941 3 September 1954 27 October 1965 2 March 1945 2 March 1945 3 September 1954 3 September 1954 3 January 1975 LAKE BROWNWOOD MODIFICATION, TEXAS (See Sec. 15 of Text) Modification of the existing Lake Brownwood located on Pecan Bayou about 8 miles north of Brownwood, Texas. LAKEVIEW LAKE, TEXAS (See Sec. 16 of Text) Construction of a dam on Mountain Creek, adjacent to the city limits of Grand Prairie, Texas, about 3 miles above the existing Mountain Creek Dam. LAVON LAKE, TEXAS (See Sec. 17 of Text) Construction of a dam on the East Fork of the Trinity River about 22 miles northeast of Dallas, Texas. LAVON LAKE MODIFICATION AND EAST FORK CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, TEXAS (See Sec. 18 of Text) Enlarge Lavon dam and enlargement and realignment of the lower 25 miles of the East Fork of the Trinity River, including rehabilitation of existing levees. Improvement of Collin County Road 115. LEWISVILLE DAM, TEXAS (See Sec. 19 of Text) Construction of a dam on the Elm Fork of the Trinity River near the city of Lewisville, Texas. MILLICAN LAKE, TEXAS (See Sec. 20 of Text) Construction of a dam on the Navasota River about 7 miles north of Navasota, Texas. NAVARRO MILLS LAKE, TEXAS (See Sec. 21 of Text) Construction of a dam on Richland Creek, a tributary of the Trinity River, about 16 miles southwest of Corsicana, Texas. Alteration of FM Highway 3164 in Wolf Creek Park. O. C. FISHER DAM AND LAKE, TEXAS (See Sec. 22 of Text) Construction of a dam on the North Concho River just above San Angelo, Texas. PROCTOR LAKE, TEXAS (See Sec. 23 of Text) Construction of a dam on the Leon River about 8 miles northeast of Comanche, Texas. RAY ROBERTS LAKE, TEXAS (See Sec. 24 of Text) Construction of a dam on the Elm Fork of the Trinity River between Sanger and Aubrey, Texas, about 30 miles upstream from the existing Lewisville Dam. ROCKLAND LAKE, TEXAS (See Sec. 38 of Text) Construction of a dam on the Neches River approximately three miles west of Rockland. SAM RAYBURN DAM AND RESERVOIR, TEXAS (See Sec. 39 of Tekt) Construction of a dam on the Angelina River about 10 miles northwest of Jasper, Texas. SAN ANTONIO CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, TEXAS (See Sec. 25 of Text) Channel improvement of the San Antonio River and tributaries in and near the city of San Antonio, Texas. SAN GABRIEL RIVER PROJECT, TEXAS (See Sec. 26 of Text) Construction of: (1) a dam (Granger Dam and Lake) on the San Gabriel River about 7 miles east of Granger, Texas, (2) a dam (North Fork Lake) on the North Fork of the San Gabriel River about 3.5 miles northwest of Georgetown, Texas and (3) a dam (South Fork Lake) on the South Fork of the San Gabriel River about 3 miles southwest of Georgetown, Texas. H. Doc. 350, 90th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 276, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 533, 78th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 554, 87th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc 403, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 341, 90th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 498, 83rd Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 315, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 535, 81st Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 276, 89th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 98, 76th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 98, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 344, 83rd Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 535, 81st Cong., 2nd sess., and H. Doc. 591, 81st Cong., 2nd sess. 16-19 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 16-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents 3 September 1954 3 September 1954 29 July 1971 2 March 1945 27 October 1965 3 September 1954 18 August 1941 24 July 1946 SOMERVILLE LAKE, TEXAS (See Sec. 27 of Text) Construction of a dam on Yegua Creek about 2 miles south of Somerville, Texas. STILLHOUSE HOLLOW DAM, TEXAS (See Sec. 28 of Text) Construction of a dam on the Lampasas River about 5 miles southwest of Belton, Texas. THREE RIVERS FLOOD CONTROL PROJECT, TEXAS (See Sec. 29 of Text) Construction of a levee to provide flood protection to the city of Three Rivers, Texas, on the Frio River. TOWN BLUFF DAM - B.A. STEINHAGEN LAKE, TEXAS (See Sec. 40 of Text) Construction of a dam on the Neches River near Jasper, Texas. TRINITY RIVER PROJECT, TEXAS (See Sec. 1 of Text) Construction of Tennessee Colony Dam located at river mile 339.2 on the Trinity River about 16 miles west of Palestine, Texas; a multiple purpose channel from the Houston, Texas ship channel to Fort Worth, Texas; a distance of approximately 363 miles, an extension of the existing Dallas, Texas, Floodway downstream approximately 9.0 miles; a realignment and enlargement of the West Fork of the Trinity River from the mouth of the West Fork to the existing Fort Worth, Texas, Floodway, a distance of approximately 31 miles; and water conveyance facilities involving construction of about 98 miles of pipeline from Tennessee Colony Lake to the existing Benbrook Lake. WACO LAKE, TEXAS (See Sec. 30 of Text) Construction of a dam on the northwest edge of Waco, Texas, below the confluence of the North, South, and Middle Bosque Rivers. WHITNEY LAKE, TEXAS (See Sec. 41 of Text) Construction of a dam on the Brazos River, about 19 miles southwest of Hillsboro, Texas. Raise the power pool 13.0 feet. WRIGHT PATMAN DAM AND LAKE, TEXAS (See Sec. 31 of Text) Construction of an earth-fill dam and reservoir. 16-20 H. Doc. 535, 81st Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 535, 81st Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 92-153, 92nd Cong. S. Doc. 98,76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 276, 89th Cong., 1st sess., and H. Doc. 364, 90th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 535, 81st Cong., 2nd sess. .H. Doc. 390, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 602, 79th Cong., 2nd sess. FORT WORTH, TEX., DISTRICT OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS TABLE 16-C (See Section 34 of Text) For Last Cost To September 30, 1981 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Big Fossil Creek, Tex.3 1969 - - Big Spring, Tex.2 1979 - - Brownwood Channel Improvement, Tex.' Carl L. Estes Dam and Lake, Tex.2 1979 - - Fort Worth Floodway (Clear Fork), Tex. 3 1971 - - Fort Worth Floodway (West Fork), Tex.3 1971 - - Lake Fork Lake, Sabine River, Tex. 2 - - Navasota Lake, Navasota River, Tex.' - - Pecan Bayou Lake, Pecan Bayou, Tex.' Plainview Local Flood Protection Project2 1979 - Roanoak Lake, Tex.2 1979 - - Rutledge Hollow Creek Channel Improvement, Poteet, Tex.3 1969 - - 1. Awaiting availability of funds. 2. Inactive. 3. Completed. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS TABLE 16-D (See Section 32 of Text) Location Dates of Inspection Big Fossil Creek Floodway 12 Aug 81 Dallas Floodway 7 May 81 Fort Worth Floodway 5 Nov 81 Greenville Floodway 21 Aug 81 Munday Floodway 29 Oct 81 Pleasantown Floodway 16 Jul 81 Poteet Floodway 14 Jul 81 San Antonio Floodway 14 Jul 81 16-21 ALBUQUERQUE, N. MEX., DISTRICT* The district comprises watershed of Canadian River and tributaries entering river west of Texas- New Mexico State line; watershed of Arkansas River and tributaries entering river west of and including Walnut Creek, Kans.; watershed of Rio Grande and tributaries eritering river west of and including Pecos River and its tributaries; and watershed of Mimbres River and its tributaries in New Mexico. IMPROVEMENTS Flood Control Page 1. Albuquerque Diversion Channels, N. Mex ........................... 17-1 2. Conchas Lake, N. Mex. ............. 17-2 3. Dodge City, Kansas ............... 17-2 4. El Paso, Tex. ...................... 17-3 5. John Martin Reservoir, Colob.......... 17-3 6. Las Animas, Colo............. ..... 17-4 7. Las Cruces, N. Mex................ 17-4 8. Rio Grande Basin, N. Mex........... 17-4 8A. Abiquiu Dam, N. Mex............... 17-5 8B. Cochiti Lake, N. Mex............... 17-5 8C. Galisteo Dam, N. Mex............... 17-6 8D. Jemez Canyon Dam, N. Mex......... 17-6 8E. Rio Grande Floodway, N. Mex........ 17-6 8F. Truth or Consequences (Hot Springs) Unit, N. Mex.......... 17-7 9. Santa Fe River and Arroyo Mascaras, N. Mex ................. 17-7 Flood Control (cont.) 10. Santa Rosa Dam and Lake, N. Mex.................... 11. Trinidad. Lake, Colo................. 12. Two Rivers Dam, N. Mex ........... 13. Inspection of completed flood control projects .................... 14. Scheduling flood control reservoir operations ................ 15. Other authorized flood control projects .................... 16. Flood control work under special authorizations ............... 17. 18. 19. General Investigations Surveys ..................... Collection and study of basic data ... Inspection of dams ................. Page 17-8 17-9 .17-10 17-10 17-10 17-11 17-11 17-11 . 17-11 . 17-11 Flood Control 1. ALBUQUERQUE DIVERSION CHANNELS, N. MEX. Location. In an area which comprises watersheds of ephemeral streams entering a 15-mile reach of Rio Grande from the east at Albuquerque, N. Mex., and vicinity. Combined drainage area of tributaries is about 276 square miles. Sandia range of the Rocky Mountains, which is about 12 miles east of Rio Grande, forms eastern border of watersheds. Crest of mountain range rises more than a mile over river to elevation of 10,692 feet above mean sea level. (See Geological Survey Map, Albuquerque, N. Mex., quadrangle, scale 1:62,500.). Existing project. Plans of improvement consists of north and south diversion channels on high ground east of and parallel to valley. Channels are designed to carry floods equal in magnitude to standard project flood from all tributaries. For description of complete improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1973. Federal cost was $17,300,000. Non- Federal cost, including required cash contribution of $530,000 was $11,060,000. *All cost and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 17-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 Local cooperation. Section 2 Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. For details of local cooperation requirements see Annual Report for 1973. Operations and results during fiscal year. The North and South Diversion Channels prevented an estimated $238,500 annual flood damages during FY. The estimated total accumulated flood damages prevented were $36,311,700. Peak flood flows recorded during FY 1981 were North Diversion Channel near Alameda, 2,600 c.f.s. on August 31, 1981, and for South Diversion Channel 400 c.f.s. on August 16, 1981. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the north and south diversion channels began in March 1965, and was completed in March 1972. Channels are in good condition and well maintained by local interests. 2. CONCHAS LAKE, N. MEX. Location. Dam is in San Miguel County, N. Mex., on Canadian River, about one-fourth mile downstream from confluence of Canadian and Conchas Rivers. (See Geological Survey State map of New Mexico, scale 1:500,000, and Geological Survey topographic map. Tucumcari quadrangle, scale 1: 125,000). E.xisting project. A concrete gravity main dam section 1,250 feet long with a maximum height of 200 feet above streambed located in Canadian River Canyon together with earth dikes on each side having an overall length of about 3.7 miles. Main section contains conduits in its base for release of water to maintain low flows and for drainage of reservoir, and an overflow, ungated spillway 300 feet long. Earth dikes vary in height up to 100 feet and north dike contains a concrete ogee-type emergency spillway 3,000 feet long. Reservoir has a gross storage capacity of 529,000 acre-feet (198,900 for flood control, 259,600 for water conservation and irrigation, and 70,500 dead storage). Dam controls 7,409 square miles of drainage area. Federal cost was $16,095,113, including $2,279,326 for initiating construction of project under authority of Emergency Relief Appropriation Act of 1935. (See Annual Report of 1973 for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation of reservoir continued. Reservoir was operated for storage of floodwaters and releases for irrigation purposes. No flood damages were prevented during FY 1981; however, $143,000 sediment damages were prevented. Estimated total accumulated flood and sediment damages prevented by project through FY 1981 were $1,688,700. Estimated irrigation benefits for FY 1981 were $200,200. Estimated total accumulated irrigation benefits through FY 1981 were $7,741,600. Pool elevation at start of FY 1981 was 4,171.02 feet with corresponding storage of 129,566 acre-feet. Total releases for reporting period were 60,884 acre-feet. Releases of 64,720 acre-feet were made to Arch Hurley Conservancy District and 2,481 acre-feet to Bell Ranch. Pool elevation on September 30, 1981, was 4,176.60 feet with corresponding storage of 155,940 acre-feet. Sediment deposition during the fiscal year was 1,277 acre-feet. Condition at end of fiscdl year. Existing project was essentially complete in 1940. Reservoir and appurtenances are in good condition and in operation. Irrigation of some lands under project was begun in November 1945. A cost sharing agreement between the Government and the State of New Mexico for additional Recreation Development at Conchas Lake was approved in August 1977. Costs of the facilities are 50 percent State of New Mexico and 50 percent Federal. Construction of these recreation facilities was initiated in FY 1978. The facilities are approximately 70 percent complete. 3. DODGE CITY, KANSAS Location. At Dodge City, Ford County, Kans., on Arkansas River about 130 miles downstream from Colorado-Kansas State line. (See Geological Survey map for Dodge quadrangle, scale 1:125,000). Existing project. About 7 miles of levees of about 8.3 feet average height on both banks of Arkansas River (4.3 miles on left bank and 2.6 miles on right bank) and enlargement of river channel to form a floodway about 470 feet wide which will convey a flow of 40,000 c.f.s. through city. Levees are protected by flexible-type steel jetties. For details of modified levee design, the result of flood in June, 1965 on the Arkansas River, see Annual Report for 1980. (See Table 17-B for authorizing legislation). Local cooperation. Section 3 Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936 applies. Formal assurances were received March 25, 1970. Local interests executed an agreement on May 21, 1973, in compliance with Section 221, 1970 Flood Control Act and PL 91-646 Uniform Relocations Assistance Act of 1970. Compliance with all assurances are satisfactory. Operations and results during fiscal year. The project was completed for full operation in April 1977. Floodflows during fiscal year were minimal and no flood damages were prevented. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project construction was initiated by relocating railroad bridge and grade 17-2 ALBUQUERQUE, N. MEX., DISTRICT raise in late 1974. Construction of the channels, levees, and floodwalls began in April 1975 and was completed in April 1977. Federal cost was $6,323,420. Non-Federal cost was $1,030,000. Project features are in good condition and well maintained by local interests. No flood control damages have been prevented as of FY 1981. 4. EL PASO, TEX. Location. At El Paso, El Paso County, Tex., which is on left bank of Rio Grande in reach that forms part of international boundary between United States and Republic of Mexico. (Geological Survey map for El Paso, Tex.; New Mexico quadrangle, scale 1:250,000.) Existing project. Consists of a single-purpose flood control system of detention dams, diversion dikes, and channels to collect, regulate and discharge arroyo runoff into Rio Grande. Runoff from tributary arroyos on eastern, southern, and western slopes of adjacent Franklin Mountains often inundates sections of city and its outlying suburban developments. Project is divided into four independent elements: Northwest area, Central area, and two units (Copper System and Bluff Channel) in Southeast area. The project plan satisfies the 1933 U.S. and Mexico agreement on limited tributary discharge into the Rio Grande in El Paso, Texas. Estimated Federal cost is $76,600,000. (See Table 17-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Section 2 Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938 applies. Estimated non-Federal cost is $18,100,000. Operations and results during fiscal year. Flood control dams in operation during FY 1980 and dates of completion of construction are as follows: Northgate and Range Dams (February 1973); Sunrise and Mountain Park Dams (October 1974); and Pershing Dam (March 1977); Fort Bliss Diversion Channel was completed in November 1978. During FY 1980 floodflows and flood control storage were minimal; however, damages which would have resulted from these flows were prevented. The estimated total flood damages prevented since completion of Northgate and Range Dams in 1973 through FY 1981 were $22,700. Condition at end offiscal year. Construction continued in the Central Area with all elements completed except for the McKelligon-Fillmore-Van Buren Dams System. The Central Area of the project is about 87 percent complete. In the Northwest Area, Oxidation Pond Dam, Mulberry and Thorn Drive Dams, Buena Vista Division and Oxidation Pond Dam Outlet Conduit have been completed. Construction has been initiated on Keystone and Mesa Dams. All DMs have been completed. The NW Area of the project is about 33% complete. Preliminary Phase I planning on the Southeast Area has been initiated. 5. JOHN MARTIN RESERVOIR, COLO. Location. On Arkansas River 1,159 miles upstream from its mouth, 300 miles downstream from its source, in Bent County, about 18 miles upstream from city of Lamar, Colo. (See Geological Survey maps for Lamar and Las Animas, Colo. quadrangles, scale 1:125,000.) Existing project. A concrete and earthfill structure about 2.6 miles long with a maximum height of 118 feet above streambed and an overflow, gated spillway 1,174 feet long. Total capacity of reservoir at spillway crest is 621,000 acre-feet (261,000 for flood control and 360,700 for conservation and recreation storage). Reservoir controls a contributing drainage area of 18,130 square miles and is operated as a unit of coordinated reservoir system for flood control in Arkansas River Basin. Federal cost was $15,446,358. Public Law 89-298 modified the act of June 22, 1936 (49 Stat. 1570) to authorize and direct Chief of Engineers to use, not to exceed 10,000 acrefeet of reservoir flood control storage space for fish and wildlife and recreation purposes. For detail of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1973. Local cooperation. Section 3 Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine maintenance and operation continued. Regulation of conservation storage continued under rules and regulations of Arkansas River Compact. No flood damages were prevented during FY 1981; however, $95,600 sediment damages were prevented. Estimated total flood and sediment damages prevented by project through FY 1981 were $74,431,100. Estimated irrigation benefits for FY 1981 were $402,000. Estimated total accumulative irrigation benefits were $20,322,400. Maximum pool elevation of 3,815.11 feet with corresponding storage of 76,236 acre-feet occurred on April 12, 1981. Total releases for FY 1981 were i75,146 acre-feet. Releases attributed to irrigation benefits amounted to 102,285 acre-feet. Sediment depositions was 85 acre-feet. Condition at end of fiscal year. Storage and operation of reservoir for irrigation began in March 1943. 17-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 A 10,000 acre-foot pool was purchased by the State of Colorado and impoundment began in June 1979. This water is stored for recreational purposes. 6. LAS ANIMAS, COLO. Location. At Las Animas, Bent County, Colo, at river mile 1,175 on Arkansas River, just upstream from its confluence with Purgatoire River, a major tributary that enters Arkansas River from south. (See Geological Survey map, Lamar, Colo.; Kans. quadrangle, scale 1:250,000.) Existing project. Consists of a levee 9.3 miles long on south bank of Arkansas River and a levee about 1 mile long on north bank. Appurtenant works include levee protection measures; an interior drainage system consisting of outlet structures, ditches, and ponding areas; structure for irrigation canal; and stop-log structure where levee crosses railroad. Design flood is 140,000 c.f.s., which is equivalent to flood of record (June 1921) flood with peak discharge of 187,000 c.f.s., reduced by regulatory effect of Pueblo Dam near Pueblo, Colo. Federal cost was $4,933,428. (See Table 17-B for authorizing legislation). Local cooperation. Section 3 Flood Control Act of 1936 applies. Local interests are in compliance with Section 221, 1970 Flood Control Act and PL 91;646 Uniform Relocation Assistance Act of 1970. Inasmuch as the flood control project extends beyond the corporate city limits of Las Animas, Colorado, the Arkansas River Conservancy District, Las Animas, Colorado, a political subdivision duly constituted and organized under the laws of the State of Colorado, is the sponsoring agency which furnished required local cooperation. Estimated non-Federal cost is $150,000. Operations and results during fiscal year. No flood control benefits accrued during FY 1981. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction contract for the project was awarded in January 1977 and was completed in 1978. Stop logs were replaced in FY 1979. Project structures are in good condition and in operation. 7. LAS CRUCES, N. MEX. Location. On tributaries of Rio Grande at Las Cruces, Dona County, N. Mex., about 87 miles downstream from Elephant Butte Dam. (See Geological Survey map for Las Cruces, N. Mex., quadrangle scale 1:62,500.) Existing project. Consists of Las Cruces Dam which extends across Alameda and Las Cruces Arroyos. The dam provides an uncontrolled outlet and spillway. The Las Cruces Dam, about 1,000 feet east of Las Cruces city limits, is earthfill construction 15, 570 feet long and 67 feet high with both slopes protected. Discharges from dam are conveyed downstream in an outlet channel to the Dona Ana Drain and thence to Rio Grande by extension of the outlet channel. Reservoir capacity is 8,200 acre-feet at spillway crest. Controlled drainage area is 28.9 square miles. Federal cost was $4,752,310. (See Table 17-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Section 2 Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938 applies. In addition to usual requirements, local sponsor, the city of Las Cruces, must alter existing improvements other than railroads; prevent encroachments upon the outlet channel from Las Cruces Dam to Dona Ana Drain and from Dona Ana Drain to Rio Grande t maintain a 290 c.f.s. channel capacity; inform citizens that residual flooding may occur downstream of the dam; and prevent encroachment on the reservoir area that would reduce its storage. The estimated non-Federal cost is $1,760,000. Local interests signed an agreement satisfying all requirements on December 15, 1972. Operations and results during fiscal year. Although the dam was physically completed in May 1975, there were no flood control or accrued benefits through FY 1981. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the dam, outlet works, spillway, and portion of outlet channel on the project was initiated in June 1973 and completed in May 1975. Construction contract for the outlet channel extension was awarded in October 1977 and completed in January 1979. The dam and channel portion are in good condition and in operation. 8. RIO GRANDE BASIN, N. MEX. Location. Improvements are on Rio Grande and tributaries in New Mexico. More definite locations and descriptions of individual projects are in following paragraphs and individual reports by projects. Existing project. Flood Control Act of 1948 authorized flood control phase of comprehensive plan of development of water resources of Rio Grande basin in New Mexico (H. Doc. 243, 81st Cong., 1st sess.) with exception of Chiflo Dam and Reservoir and spillway gate structure at Chamita Dam. Although recommended Chiflo Dam and Reservoir was deleted from authorized plan, it was excluded without prejudice to future consideration by Congress. It was requested at that time, by States of Colorado and Texas, that project be deferred for restudy regarding required storage and methods of operation. 17-4 ALBUQUERQUE, N. MEX., DISTRICT By same act, Congress also authorized for construction irrigation phase of comprehensive plan as recommended by Bureau of Reclamation (H. Doc. 653, 81st Cong., 2nd sess.). The act also stipulated that work should be prosecuted in accordance with joint agreement approved by Secretary of the Army and Acting Secretary of the Interior on November 21, 1957. In addition, under that agreement Bureau of Reclamation was given responsibility for construction, operation, and maintenance of channel rectification, and drainage rehabilitation and extension phases of unified plan of improvement. Authority for Chamita Dam and Reservoir was abrogated when Cochiti Dam and Reservoir was authorized. (See Table 17-B for authorizing legislation and Table 17-C for existing projects.) All operations and costs for projects in authorized plan are in individual reports on the following pages. 8A. ABIQUIU DAM, N. MEX. Location. Project is one unit of flood control phase of comprehensive plan for Rio Grande and tributaries, New Mexico. Abiquiu Dam is on Rio Chama near town of Abiquiu, N. Mex., about 32 miles upstream from coifluence of Rio Chama and Rio Grande. (See Geological Survey Map for plan and profile of Rio Chama, N. Mex., from mouth to mile 103, sheet 1, and Army Map Service, Aztec, N. Mex.; Colorado NJ 13-10, scale 1:250,000.) Existing project. An earthfill dam 1,540 feet long, 325 feet high, with a 12-foot diameter controlled outlet, and an uncontrolled spillway in a natural saddle about one mile north of left abutment. Reservoir provides 569,000 acre-feet of flood control and sediment storage. Total capacity at spillway crest is 1,217,000 acre-feet. For detail description of completed improvements and authorizing legislation see Annual Report of 1973. Federal cost was $21,275,204. A major rehabilitation project costing $5,355,000 was completed in September, 1980 and the recreation facilities costing $138,930 were completed in FY 1981. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine maintenance and operation continued. Storage and flows were regulated in accordance with regulations prescribed by Rio Grande Compact Commission. On October 1, 1980, the pool elevation was 6,202.30 feet. The maximum pool (6,202.30 feet) and storage (133,200 acre-feet) occurred on October 1, 1980. On September 30, 1981, the pool elevation was 6,161.75 feet with a corresponding storage of 35,985 acre-feet. There was 708 acre-feet of sediment deposition during the year. There were no flood damages prevented during FY 1981. Sediment damages prevented were $79,300. Accumulated flood and sediment damages prevented by the project since completion were $32,885,700 through FY 1981. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was placed in operation in February 1963. Project structures are in good condition and in operation. 8B. COCHITI LAKE, N. MEX. Location. Dam is at river mile 340 on Rio Grande (river mile 0 being at intersection of New Mexico- Texas State line with international boundary at El Paso, Tex.), near Pueblo de Cochiti, which is about 50 miles upstream from Albuquerque, N. Mex. (See Geological Survey Maps, Cochiti Dam, N. Mex., quadrangle and Santo Domingo Pueblo, N. Mex., quadrangle, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. Consists of an earthfill dam about 5.4 miles long with a maximum height of 251 feet above streambed. Project extends generally in an east-west line across Rio Grande to a point about 2 miles east of Rio Grande and then southward across Santa Fe River. An uncontrolled spillway with a 460-foot-long ogee-weir and a 160-foot notch 10.5 feet deep in the center is at the embankment on south side of Santa Fe River. Operational releases for flood control and irrigation are made through a 3-barrel gated conduit in left abutment on Rio Grande. Reservoir has a storage capacity of 482,200 acre-feet for flood control, 57,580 acre-feet for sediment and 46,220 acre-feet for recreation, a total of 586,000 acre-feet. The project controls flood waters from a 11,695 square mile drainage area. For more improvements details see Annual Report for 1980. Estimated Federal cost is $96,900,000. (See Table 17-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. With the construction complete on the embankment and allied facilities the project was reclassified from a construction to an operational project in June 1975. On October 1, 1980, the pool elevation was 5,321.55 feet with a corresponding storage of 45,340 acrefeet. The maximum pool elevation was 5,324.37 feet with a storage of 49,804 acre-feet on February 26, 1981. There was 538 acre-feet of sediment deposition during FY 1981. There were no flood damages prevented during FY 1981. Sediment damages prevented were $60,400. Accrued total damages prevented are $34,347,000. Conditions at end of fiscal year. Construction of 17-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 the dam, outlet works, spillway, operations area operator's quarters, overlook and all relocations have been completed. Construction of the Cochiti Recreation Area facilities was completed in August 1976, the Restoration work in August 1977, and the Visitors Center in August 1977. Construction contract for the Tetilla Peak Recreation Area was awarded in January 1976 and terminated in November 1978. Surety was defaulted in December 1978 and the contract was readvertised and awarded in FY 80. The Tetilla Peak Recreation Area and overall project is complete. 8C. GALISTEO DAM, N. MEX. Location. Dam is at river mile 12 on Galisteo Creek, a tributary of Rio Grande. Definite project site is about 8 miles upstream of project document site. Reservoir will extend upstream from dam for about 4 miles to near village of Waldo, N. Mex. (See Geological Survey Map, San Pedro 1, N. Mex. quadrangle, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. Consists of an earthfill dam 2,820 feet long with a maximum height of 158 feet above streambed. The outlet works consist of a 10-foot diameter uncontrolled outlet with a discharge capacity of 4,980 cubic feet per second with pool at spillway crest elevation. The spillway is a broad crested weir 250 feet long in right abutment. The flood control storage is 89,000 acre-feet. For more details of completed improvements and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1973. Federal cost was $14,220,053. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Operation of the project began on October 11, 1970. The reservoir was empty on October 1, 1980. Outflow from the project ranged from zero to the maximum inflow and discharge of 1,700 c.f.s. on July 26, 1981. There was 202 acre-feet of sediment deposition during the year and the reservoir was empty on September 30, 1981. Sediment damages prevented during FY 1981 were $22,600 totaling $69,900 through FY 1981. Condition at end offiscal year. Project was placed in operation in October 1970. Project structures are in good condition and in operation. 8D. JEMEZ CANYON DAM, N. MEX. Location. in Sandoval County, N. Mex., on Jemez River about 2 miles upstream from confluence of Jemez River and Rio Grande, about 5 miles northwest of Bernalillo, N. Mex. (See Geological Survey map for Bernalillo quadrangle, scale 1:125,000.) Existing project. An earthfill dam 780 feet long with a maximum height of 136 feet above streambed, and off-channel uncontrolled saddle spillway 400 feet wide, and a 13-foot diameter gated outlet in left abutment with discharge capacity of 8,340 cubic feet per second with pool at spillway crest elevation. Reservoir has a capacity of 110,750 acre-feet (73,000 acre-feet for flood control and 37,750 acre-feet for sediment control). For more detailed description of completed improvements and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1973. Federal cost to date is $4,213,147. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results dumrng fiscal year. A 2,000 acre-foot sediment pool was impounded in March 1979. On October 1, 1980, the pool elevation was 5,158.49 feet with a corresponding storage of 1,579 acre-feet. The maximum pool elevation was 5,162.87 feet with a storage of 2,846 acre-feet on May 3, 1981. The reservoir was regulated for sediment control during Fiscal Year 1981. Sediment deposition during the year was 269 acre-feet. There were no flood damages prevented during FY 1981. Sediment benefits during FY 1981 were $30,100. Estimated total accumulated flood and sediment damages prevented by the project through FY 1981 were $3,926,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was placed in operation in October 1953. Project structures are in good condition and in operation. 8E. RIO GRANDE FLOODWAY, N. MEX. Location. Project is one unit of flood control phase of comprehensive plan of improvement for Rio Grande Basin in New Mexico. It is on Rio Grande and covers section of river commencing near Truth or Consequences (formerly Hot Springs) at about river mile 123 and extends upstream from Espanola, N. Mex., about river mile 394. (See Table 17-D on Rio Grande Floodway.) Existing project. Consists of flood protection and major drainage improvements by channel rectification, levee enlargement and construction, and bank stabilization work where needed to protect levees. Construction of project is a joint undertaking by Bureau of Reclamation and the Corps. Portions to be done by Corps will consist of levee enlargement, construction, and bank protection work, with channel- rectification and drainage-rehabilitation work the responsibility of Bureau of Reclamation. Levees constructed by local interests exist through reach of 17-6 ALBUQUERQUE, N. MEX., DISTRICT river involved, but are not uniform as to grade, section, or standard of construction, and in many places are threatened by meandering river. (See Table 17-D on existing project and Table 17-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. In addition to usual requirements, local interests are responsible for all highway, bridge, and public utility relocations or replacements required in construction of project. Local interests will also be required to comply with requirements of Section 221, 1970 Flood Control Act and PL 91-646 Uniform Relocation Assistance Act of 1970. Total costs for all requirements for completed Albuquerque unit under terms of project authorization were $75,000. There were no non-Federal costs in connection with construction of Cochiti to Rio Puerco unit of floodway. Espanola Valley unit is in the deferred category. The city of Espanola or Santa Clara Pueblo has not given indication they plan positive action to solve the flooding problem. For more details see Annual Report for 1980. Operations and results during fiscal year. There were $539,400 in flood damages prevented by the completed floodway project during FY 1981. Estimated total accumulated flood damages prevented by the floodway project through FY 1981 amounted to $34;827,200. The peak flow of the Rio Grande through the middle valley was 2,850 c.f.s. at Albuquerque on August 21, 1981. The peak at San Acacia was 9,690 c.f.s. on June 12, 1981. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of Albuquerque unit and Cochiti to Rio Puerco units of Rio Grande Floodway project is complete. San Acacia to Bosque del Apache unit is deferred for restudy. The Truth or Consequences (Hot Springs) unit was reclassified to the active category on July 18, 1973, based on a letter of intent to cooperate from the city of Truth or Consequences dated May 31, 1973. The Espanola Valley unit was reclassified to deferred category on 17 October 1973. 8F. TRUTH OR CONSEQUENCES UNIT, N. MEX. Location. Vicinity City of Truth or Consequences, New Mexico. Existing prqject. Plan of improvement will include 4 miles of 20-foot-high levees with positive seepage control, an interior drainage system, and 5 miles of diversion channels. The diversion channels would be required for control of floods on tributary arroyos at and in the vicinity of Truth or Consequences. Estimated Federal cost is not available pending project reformulation. (See Table 17-B for authorizing legislation.) Location cooperation. Section 2 Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Letters of intent have been received from the City of Truth or Consequences (dated July 7, 1977) and the County of Sierra (dated July 6, 1977). Operations and results during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning was initiated in FY 1979 and continued during FY 1981. 9. SANTA FE RIVER AND ARROYO MASCARAS, N. MEX. Location. Santa Fe, New Mexico, and Vicinity, within Santa Fe County, First Congressional District. (See Geological Survey map, Santa Fe South and McClure Reservoir quadrangles, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. The recommended plan is located in Santa Fe, capital of New Mexico. The city of Santa Fe is experiencing new growth and development throughout the city. The confluence of Arroyo Mascaras with the Santa Fe River is near the downtown area of Santa Fe. The authorized plan of improvement consists of both structural and nonstructural elements. The structural plan consists of (a) improvements on the Santa Fe River for flood .control provided that no improvements be considered east of the existing Nichols Dam, (b) raising the Apartment Drive Bridge and replacing the College Street Bridge, both located within the urban area of Santa Fe, and (c) 1.2 miles of improved channel on Arroyo Mascaras. The nonstructural portion is to floodproof new properties in the 100-year floodway in two reaches as follows: (1) west city limits to Arroyo Mascaras and (b) Camino Cabre to Two-mile Reservoir. Estimated Federal cost is not available pending project reformulation. (See Table 17-B authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Prior to construction, local interests must furnish assurances satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army that they will: (1) Provide without cost to the United States all land, easements, and rights-of-way necessary for construction of the project; (2) hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works; (3) administer, maintain and operate the works after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army; (4) make any alterations to existing improvements other than railroad bridges and approaches connected therewith, which may be required because of the constructions works; (5) prevent encroachments in the existing Santa Fe River channel below any dam project and maintain a minimum channel capacity of 5,000 c.f.s.: (6) bear 17-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 all costs of operation and maintenance of the flood control works presently estimated at $5,500 on an average annual basis; (7) adopt and enforce flood plain regulations appropriate to the nonstructural measures of the plan of improvement which, combined with the structural measures, would minimize damages to future development in the project area that would be inundated from a flood that could be expected to occur once in 100 years; (8) consider the adoption of flood plain regulations for areas other than those covered by the plan of improvement as necessary to assure compatibility between future developments within the flood plains and the protection afforded compatibility by the improvements; (9) publicize the flood plain information contained in a Flood Plain Information Report to be provided, and make it readily available to all interested persons; and (10) periodically inform all concerned in a manner satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army, that some flooding will continue to occur due to flows greater than design magnitude. Operations and results during fiscal year. Plan of action and hydrology design memorandum were completed in FY 1979. Studies continued during FY 1981. 10. SANTA ROSA DAM AND LAKE, N. MEX. Location. Lake is in Guadalupe County, on Pecos River, at river mile 766.4 approximately 7 miles north of Santa Rosa, N. Mex. (See U.S. Geological Survey map, Corazon, N. Mex., sheet, scale 1:125,000.) Existing project. Project operation began in November 1979. Authorized plan of improvement consists of an earth and rock fill dam 1,950 feet long and 212 feet maximum height above the streambed. Project purposes are flood control, irrigation and sediment retention. An unlined, open rock cut about 1,000 feet back from the left abutment serves as an uncontrolled spillway. The outlet works, located in the left abutment, consists of a control tower, intake structure with gates, and a 10-foot diameter concrete lined tunnel with a terminal flip bucket energy dissipater. Storage capacity at the spillway crest is 449,000 acre-feet which includes 82,000 acrefeet sediment reserve, 200,000 acre-feet irrigation and 167,000 acre-feet flood control storage. Surface area of the reservoir at the spillway crest is 10,740 acres. Contributing drainage area at the damsite is 2,434 square miles. Authorized project also includes modification of the existing Sumner Lake (formerly Alamogordo Dam and Reservoir) on the Pecos River (river mile 710.8), about 56 miles downstream from Santa Rosa Dam and Lake. This modification provided for a reservoir capacity of 210,000 acre-feet by raising the dam embankment 10.5 feet and constructing an emergency spillway through the ridge on the right abutment. Changes to the service spillway were to limit the discharge to the capacity of the existing chute spillway and tainters. Project document also reallocated the storage in Sumner Lake to exclusive flood control use. Subsequent to project authorization, the Bureau of Reclamation modified the existing structure to its feasible limit without major reconstruction. This modification consisted of raising the dam height 16 feet, altering the existing service spillway to limit the discharge to 56,000 c.f.s., and constructing an uncontrolled emergency spillway in the left abutment. The spillway capacity is 206,000 c.f.s. Storage allocation studies in response to authorizing document provides for transfer of all but 20,000 acre-feet of irrigation storage to Santa Rosa Dam and Lake with remainder of storage in Sumner Lake reserved for flood control purpose. This transfer will be done under the terms of the Pecos River Compact and the Carlsbad Irrigation District. The Federal (Corps of Engineers) cost for Santa Rosa Dam and Lake is $40,200,000. Local cooperation. In addition to first costs, operation and maintenance of both reservoirs will be responsibility of Federal Government; however, Carlsbad Irrigation District will be required to contribute to operation and maintenance costs an annual amount equal to what they now pay toward Sumner Lake. Carlsbad Irrigation District also will be required to agree to use of Sumner Lake for floodcontrol purposes. Because they will realize equivalent benefits from storage capacity in Santa Rosa Dam and Lake, they will be required to continue to fulfill their repayment obligation. The New Mexico Division of Parks to manage Santa Rosa Dam and Lake. Activities include camping, picnicking, boating and hiking. For details on final approval in 1974, for transfer of irrigation storage from Sumner Lake to Santa Rosa Dam and Lake see Annual Report for 1980. Operations and results during fiscal year. The project was completed in late 1979. Reservoir operation for irrigation was started in March 1980 and the reservoir was operated for irrigation purposes only during FY 1981. No flood damages were prevented during FY 1981. Pool elevation at start of fiscal year was 4,671.81 feet with storage of 2,501 acrefeet. Total releases for the fiscal year were 27,155 acre-feet. Pool elevation on September 30, 1981 was 4,720.99 feet with a storage of 36,551 acre-feet. The 17-8 ALBUQUERQUE, N. MEX., DISTRICT maximum elevation was 4,721.10 feet with a storage of 36,753 acre-feet on September 15, 1981. There was 414 acre-feet of sediment deposition during the fiscal year. Sediment damages prevented during the fiscal year were $46,400. Releases attributed to irrigation benefits were $6,868 acre-feet. Irrigation benefits for the fiscal year were $24,000 with an accumulative total of $122,700 through FY 1981. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction contract for the recreation area was awarded in September 1979 and completed in October 1980. Design studies for spillway modification were initiated in FY 1979. 11. TRINIDAD LAKE, COLO. Location. On Purgatoire River about 161 miles above its junction with Arkansas River. Project is about 4 miles upstream from city of Trinidad, Colo. (See Geological Survey map. Trinidad, Colo., quadrangle, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. Consists of an earthfill dam 6,610 feet long, with a maximum height of 200 feet above streambed, an uncontrolled spillway 1,000 feet wide in left abutment, and a 10-foot diameter, gate-controlled conduit in right abutment with discharge capacity of 5,870 c.f.s. with water surface at top of flood control pool. Reservoir provides for storage of 51,000 acre-feet for flood control, 39,000 acre-feet for sediment, 20,000 acre-feet irrigation, and 4,500 acre-feet for recreation, a total of 114,500 acre-feet. Reservoir controls a drainage area of 671 square miles and will be operated for flood and sediment control, irrigation, and recreation purposes. Estimated Federal cost is $50,900,00 (CE) and $160,000 (USBR). (See Table 17-B for authorizing legislation). Local cooperation. Requirements based on approved general design memorandum studies and executed irrigation repayment contract: Repayment by Purgatoire River Water Conservancy District of first cost allocated to irrigation established as 29.28 percent of total project cost generally in accordance with Federal reclamation law procedures, but not to exceed $6,435,600, except that repayment of irrigation first cost may extend over a period not to exceed 75 years including a 5-year development period which results in an actual amortization period of 70 years; contribution of $21,400 annually by State of Colorado for replacement of evaporation and seepage losses from permanent fishery pool; Purgatoire River Water Conservancy District (representing the irrigators) is required to bear not more than 19.82 percent of annual joint-use operation and maintenance costs and not more than 2.52 percent of major replacement costs; in addition, estimated annual cost to city of Trinidad for maintenance of channel of Purgatoire River through city is $1,100. In addition, conservancy district must make arrangements for transfer of Model Land and Irrigation Co.'s storage rights from existing Model Reservoir to Trinidad Reservoir. Storage for recreation purposes not included in authorized project plan; however, project document noted that substantial benefits would be derived from such use and that there was strong local support for such storage. Provision was made in project plan for 4,500 acre-feet of permanent storage for recreation; however, since flows of Purgatoire River are fully appropriated, water rights were acquired by non-Federal interests. Estimated cost of initial filling of pool was $250,000 and replacement of evaporation losses will cost an estimated $21,400 per year. Lands and facilities for recreation was provided at Federal expense, but cost of water rights will be borne by the State of Colorado. Non-Federal cost is $6,686,000. Assurances of local cooperation received from City of Trinidad and Purgatoire River Water Conservancy District were formally accepted May 11, 1967, after execution of irrigation repayment contract. Stipulated decree changing place of storage of water rights decreed to existing Model Reservoir from that reservoir to proposed Trinidad Reservoir was conditionally approved by Las Animas County, Colorado, District Court April 15, 1965, subject to ultimate execution and approval of irrigation repayment contract, which qualifying condition is now removed. Purgatoire River Water Conservancy District, representing water users, signed prime irrigation repayment contract January 21, 1967. Prime contract was then signed by Regional Director, Region 7, Bureau of Reclamation February 10, 1967. Irrigation repayment contract was confirmed by decree of Las Animas County, Colorado, District Court entered into March 21, 1967, and 30-day period of appeal required by Colorado statutes expired with no appeals being filed. Operations and results during fiscal year. The reservoir was operated for flood control and irrigation releases during the fiscal year. On October 1, 1980 the pool elevation was 6,207.00 feet with a corresponding storage of 40,200 acre-feet. The maximum pool elevation was 6,212.94 feet with a corresponding storage of 50,048 acre-feet on September 8, 1981. On September 30, 1981, the pool elevation was 6,209.02 feet with a corresponding storage of 45,763 acre-feet. Sediment deposition during FY 1981 was 504 acre-feet. Sediment damages prevented during FY 1981 was $188,500. Accrued sediment benefits are $636,600. Irrigation benefits for FY 1981 were $176,200. Accrued irrigation benefits through FY 17-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 1981 were $508,900. Irrigation releases were 44,823 acre-feet. Irrigation benefits for FY 1981 were $176,200 with accrued benefits of $508,900 through FY 1981. Conditions at end of fiscal year. Relocations of cemeteries, county road, water storage tank, and state highway completed; construction of outlet works completed; construction of dam, spillway, railroad relocation, water line relocation, and operations area was completed in February 1977. Construction contract for recreation facilities was completed in September 1980. The project was classified operational in February 1979, and completed during FY 1981. 12. TWO RIVERS DAM, N. MEX. Location. About 14 miles southwest of Roswell, N. Mex., on Rio Hondo and Rocky Arroyo. Rio Hondo is formed at confluence of Rio Ruidoso and Rio Bonito, near village of Hondo, N. Mex., in foothills region of Sierra Blanca in southeastern part of Lincoln County, N. Mex., and flows generally easterly to its confluence with Pecos River near Roswell, N. Mex. (See Geological Survey map, Hondo Reservoir quadrangle, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. Diamond "A' Dam is an earthfill structure, 4,885 feet long and 98 feet high, with a gated outlet. Rocky Dam is an earthfill structure 2,940 feet long and 118 feet high with an uncontrolled outlet. No provision is made for storage except for flood control. Flood releases will be controlled, so that flows through Roswell will not exceed channel capacity Rio Hondo which is about 1,000 c.f.s. Capacity of Two Rivers Reservoir at spillway crest is 166,200 acre-feet, of which 18,000 acre-feet are provided for sediment reserve. Together these dams regulate runoff from 1,027 square miles of drainage area. For details of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1973. Federal cost was $4,832,725. Local cooperation. Section 2 Flood Control Act of 1938 applies and compliance is satisfactory. Total cost to local interests was $144,000, of which $60,000 was for construction of access road and $84,000 for lands and rights-of-way. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine maintenance and operation continued. The reservoir was empty on October 1, 1980. The maximum flow was 111 c.f.s. on August 18, 1981. There were no flood damages prevented during 1981. Sediment damages prevented were $10,000. Estimated total accumulated flood and sediment damages prevented through FY 1981 were $3,346,300. There were 89 acre-feet of sediment deposition during FY 1981. The accrued sediment benefits through FY 1981 are $421,300. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete and was placed in operation July 1963. Project features are in good condition and in operation. 13. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Included under this heading is inspection of completed flood control projects transferred to local interests for operation and maintenance. Projects in Kansas, Texas, Colorado, and New Mexico were inspected. FY 1981 cost was $43,805 and total cost to September 30, 1981 was $307,623. 14. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS Pursuant to Section 7, Flood Control Act of 1944, three projects are operated by others for flood control. These projects are Platoro, Pueblo, and Sumner. Platoro Dam on Conejos River above the town of Platoro, Conejos County, Colo. controls runoff from 40 square miles of high mountain area. Authorized purposes are irrigation storage and flood control. Total storage is 60,000 acre-feet with the top 6,000 acre-feet for flood control. The 54,000 acre-feet is dual purpose storage with flood-control on a forecast basis during spring runoff. Platoro Dam was authorized by Interior Appropriation Act of 1941, (see H Doc 693, 76th Cong., 3rd Sess.) Construction of project was completed by Water and Power Resources Service (Bureau of Reclamation) in Fiscal Year 1952. On October 1, 1980, storage in Platoro reservoir was 19,690 acre-feet; elevation 9,982.4 feet. There was no flood control releases during FY 1981. Maximum storage of 20,500 acre-feet, elevation 9,983.8 feet occurred on April 27, 1981. On September 30, 1981, storage was 19,960 acre-feet, elevation 9,982.4 feet. Peak flow at Mogote gage was 1,570 c.f.s. on June 9, 1981. No flood damages prevented by the project during the FY 1981. Total flood damages prevented to date remain at $2,676,700. Total cost for activity during FY 1981 was $12,198. Pueblo Dam is part of the Fryingpan-Arkansas project which was authorized under Public Law 87- 590, 87th Congress, HR 2206 on August 16, 1962. The project was completed in August 1975. Pueblo is operated by the Water and Power Resources Services and is located at river mile 1,293.7 on the Arkansas River in Pueblo County Colorado. Pueblo reservoir has 27,000 acre-feet exclusive flood space and 66,000 acre-feet joint use space. 17-10 ALBUQUERQUE, N. MEX., DISTRICT Operation of Pueblo Reservoir began on February 10, 1974. Storage on October 1, 1980 was 34,705 acre-feet, elev. 4799.96 feet. Maximum storage during the year was 98,461 acre-feet, elev. 4832.91 feet on March 14, 1981. Storage on September 30, 1981 was 32,973 acre-feet, elev. 4798.69 feet. There were no flood damages prevented in FY 1981. Total cost for FY 1981 activity was $13,859. Total flood damages prevented to date are $496,600. Sumner Dam is located on the Pecos River at river mile 710.8 in DeBaca County, New Mexico. Sumner Dam was authorized as Alamogordo Dam by the Secretary of the Interior Under a Finding of Feasibility approved by the President of the USA on 6 November 1935, under the Federal Reclamation laws. The original project was completed in 1937. Modification work of raising the dam 16 feet, adding a spillway and limiting the service spillway floor to 56,000 c.f.s. was completed in 1957. A twenty-four inch bypass line was installed in 1977 to pass flows less than 100 c.f.s. Storage on October 1, 1980 was 12,393 acre-feet, elevation 4,240.0 feet. Maximum storage for FY 1981 was 36,661 acre-feet, elevation 4,254.0 feet on September 25. Storage on September 30, 1981 was 33,470 acre-feet, elevation 4,253.8 feet. There were no flood damages prevented in FY 1981. Total cost for FY 1981 activity was $5,984. 15. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See Table 17-E. 16. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (prea uthoriization). Costs (luring FY 1981 were: Belen, NM, Rio Grallde, $7,321; Granada, CO, $74,872; Holly, CO, $103,583: Lamed, Pawnee River, KS, $964,616; Las Cruces, NM, $7,500; San Vincente Arroyo, Silver ('ity., NM, $43,909; Santa Domingo Pueblo, NM, $7,5t): Shooks Run, Colorado Springs, CO, $6,500. ('nstruction was completed for the project at Holly, CO during the fiscal year. Eiergeucy .flood control activities repair, flood t'ighting, and rescue work. (Public Law 99, 84th Con g., and antecedent legislation.) Federal costs for fiscal year 1981 were $115,123 for advance preparation, and $253,366 for flood emergency operations, and $391,871 for repair and restoration. Emergency bank protection (Sec. 14, 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Cong.) Federal costs for the fiscal year were $269,277. Snagging and clearing of navigable streams and tributaries in the interests of flood control (Sec. 208 of the 1954 Flood Control Act, PL 780, 83d Congress.) Federal costs for the fiscal year were $4,152. General Investigations 17. SURVEYS Costs for the fiscal year were $743,030 for flood control studies, $69,959 for special studies (coordination studies with other agencies), and $739,181 for pre-authorization studies, Phase I (Arkansas River and Tributaries above John Martin Dam, Colorado, $422,073 and Rio Grande and Tributaries (Rio Puerco/Rio Salado), New Mexico, $317,108). 18. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Fiscal year costs were $154,939 for flood plain management and technical services, and $18,205 for White Sands test facility special study. A flood insurance study was completed for Alamogordo, New Mexico, and two studies to update flood insurance studies for Las Cruces, New Mexico and the northwest portion of El Paso, Texas were continued. Hydrologic studies involving collection and study of basic data, such as stream flow data, collection of suspended sediment samples, recording rain gage data, hydrometeorological studies, and sedimentation studies continued. Costs during the fiscal year were $6,205. 19. INSPECTION OF DAMS Included under this heading is the program of inventory of dams enacted into law (HR 15951) August 9, 1972. The area of responsibility for the District is the state of New Mexico. Federal costs for the fiscal year were $239,096 for both programs. 17-11 TABLE 17-A REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 Sept. 30, 1981 1. Albuquerque New Work Diversion Channels Project, N. Mex. (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) (Other Contributed Funds) 2. Conchas Lake, N. Mex. 3. Dodge City, Kans. (Contributed Funds) 4 E1 Paso, Tex. 5. John Martin Reservoir, Colo. 6. Las Animas, Colo. 7. Las Cruces, N. Mex. (Other Contributed Funds) 8. Rio Grande Basin, N. Mex. 8A. Abiquiu Dam, N. Mex. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 8B. Cochiti Lake, New Work N. Mex. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 8C. Galisteo Dam, New Work N. Mex. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. 200,000 234,221 418,500 390,755 - 22,000 2,525 3,300,000 4,146,919 21,000 15,115 633,200 567,951 2,429,000 2,370,523 238,000 238,198 582,283 571,526 250,000 40,955 624,000 640,267 397,000 675,590 549,500 530,834 75,000 74,452 17,268,450 17,268,450 - - 28,372 - 28,372 - 30,000 5,000 123,980 506,000 397,494 22,278 34,831 6,665 2,853,094 3,184,758 192,000 119,424 1,084,000 965,929 -8,000 51,037 18,000 39,682 2,737,000 2,808,747 1,456,200 1,386,693 69,000 542,208 1,123,000 797,977 105,000 58,738 68,130 68,571 532,000 545,723 3,931,000 3,315,190 29,610 92,398 1,187,000 964,294 - 17,495 1,667 2,453,000 2,168,642 534,000 481,865 2,380,000 739,072 1,035,800 1,259,753 87,000 119,943 17-12 5,000 32,976 579,000 628,895 5,563,000 4,447,994 21,368 37,001 726,700 1,090,652 22,573 59,000 2,759 13,629 228,015 434,000 596,559 1,971,819 988,000 916,827 100,000 112,607 518,356 545,237 854,644 854,644 13,828,306 13,771,822 8,068,972 7,990,407 6,323,420 6,323,420 147,999 147,999 31,001,294 29,147,930 15,446,358 15,446,358 10,213,200 10,163,639 4,956,000 4,956,000 4,821,715 4,755,069 699,383 687,353 26,756,128 26,521,363 6,225,106 6,205,450 96,900,259 96,521,460 4,489,300 4,298,657 14,220,053 14,220,053 911,477 909,428 - - - -- TABLE 17-A (Continued) ALBUQUERQUE, N. MEX., DISTRICT COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 Sept. 30, 1981 8D. Jemez Canyon New Work Dam, N. Mex. Approp. 31,000 - 4,730 - 4,213,147 Cost 6,785 24,175 4,770 - 4,213,147 Maint. Approp. 358,000 695,000 445,000 246,000 3,981,351 Cost 468,050 180,980 921,243 293,304 3,977,829 8E. Rio Grande, New Work Floodway, T. or C. Approp. - - - 150,000 5,049,868 Unit, N. Mex. Cost - -- - 167,964 5,067,832 9. Santa Fe River New Work and Arroyo Approp. 100,000 218,500 260,000 140,000 718,500 Mascaras Cost 99,224 212,090 238,817 112,864 662,995 10. Santa Rosa Dam New Work & Lake, N. Mex. Approp. 6,505,000 7,041,000 4,772,000 1,570,000 38,693,562 Cost 7,363,338 7,619,618 4,522,362 2,249,340 38,582,376 Maint. Approp. - 15,000 278,000 323,000 616,000 Cost - 2,742 226,714 369,106 598,562 11. Trinidad Lake, New Work Colo. Approp. 6,660,000 1,700,000 1,447,000 - 50,606,758 Cost 6,086,578 1,619,304 1,789,677 119,274 49,834,938 Maint. Approp. 195,000 412,000 315,000 748,000 1,776,500 Cost 181,003 184,769 420,326 814,676 1,756,724 12. Two Rivers Dam, New Work N. Mex. Approp. 44,100 - 2,000 - 70 - 4,832,869 Cost 41,956 - 73 - 4,832,867 Maint. Approp. 85,500 102,000 167,000 146,000 1,300,912 Cost 85,324 86,372 140,381 163,806 1,274,367 1. Includes $3,492,696 maintenance and improvement costs Espanola Valley unit. Excludes $1,000,011 transferred to Bureau and $869,978 for emergency relief, excludes $2,279,326, cost of of Reclamation under memorandum agreement between that initiating project under the authority of Emergency Relief Ap- agency and the Corps. Does not include funds referenced in propriation Act of 1935 and $222,669, the cost for work performed footnote 3. with funds transferred to the Corps under Public Works acceler- 4. Includes cost for completed Albuquerque and Cochiti to Rio ation Act of 1962. Puerco units and for preconstruction planning of Espanola Valley 2. Excludes $59,977 emergency relief funds for new work. In- unit. Excludes costs incurred by Bureau of Reclamation from eludes $30,000 for Code 710. funds transferred to that agency under the memorandum agree- 3. Includes funds appropriated for completed Albuquerque and ment covering construction of Cochiti to Rio Puerto unit. Cochiti to Rio Puerco units and for preconstruction planning of Table 17-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents DODGE CITY, KANS. (See Section 3 of Text) Oct. 23, 1962 7 miles of levees and enlargement of river channel to 470 foot wide floodway through city. Based on design flow of 40,000 c.f.s. with added requirements for top of levees to not be lower than profile of 60,000 c.f.s. flow. EL PASO, TEX. (See Section 4 of Text) Oct. 27, 1965 A single-purpose flood control system of detention dams, diversion dikes and channels to collect, regulate and discharge arroyo runoff in the Rio Grande. Consists of four independent units (NW Area, Central Area, and two units, Copper System and Bluff Channel of the SE Area.) LAS ANIMAS, COLO. (See Section 6 of Text) Oct. 22, 1965 About 10.6 miles of levees on both banks of Arkansas River including interior drainage system to protect the city from floodflows up to 140,000 c.f.s. H. Doc. 498, 87th Cong. 2nd sess.1 H. Doc. 207, 89th Cong., 1st sess.' H. Doc. 165, 89th Cong., 1st sess. 1 17-13 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 Table 17-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents LAS CRUCES, N. MEX. (See Section 7 of Text) Oct. 23, 1962 Two earthfill dams, one 15,570 ft. long and the other 1,790 ft. long with S. Doc. 117, 87th Cong., uncontrolled outlets and spillways located east of city to intercept floodflows 2d sess. from Alameda, Las Cruces and Campus Arroyos. Discharges from dams to be conveyed through city to Rio Grande by an unlined trapezoidal channel. RIO GRANDE BASIN, N. MEX. (See Section 8 of Text) June 30, 1948 Authorized to be appropriated $3,500,000 to be expended by the Dept. of the Army for partial accomplishment of approved general comprehensive plan for the Rio Grande Basin in N. Mex. and Colorado. May 17, 1950 Authorized to be appropriated an additional $39,000,000 for Dept. of the Army for prosecution of comprehensive plan for the Rio Grande Basin. July 14, 1960 Authorized Cochiti Dam on Rio Grande and Galisteo Dam on Galisteo Creek as additions to authorized comprehensive plan for Rio Grande Basin (Cochiti Dam was authorized in lieu of Low Chamita Dam of Chamita Reservoir Project on Rio Chama under "substitute plan"). Also authorized to be appropriated an additional $58,300,000 for Dept. of the Army for this addition to comprehensive plan for the Rio Grande Basin. COCHITI LAKE, N. MEX. (See Section 8 of Text) July 14, 1960 Earthfill dam 5.1 miles in length and maximum of 251 ft. in height with controlled outlet and uncontrolled spillway, located on Rio Grande and across Santa Fe River. For flood control, sediment storage and irrigation release purposes. Authority for Low Chamita Dam on Rio Chama was abrogated when Cochiti Dam was authorized. March 26, 1964 Project was modified for conservation and development of fish and wildlife resources and recreation, about 50,000 acre-feet of water for initial filling of a permanent pool of 1,200 surface acres in the reservoir, and thereafter sufficient water annually to offset evaporation from such area. Oct. 22, 1976 Project was modified to direct the Secretary of the Army, acting through Chief of Engineers, to construct for public recreation purposes an access road from United States Highway 85 to Cochiti Lake. June 30, 1948 and May 17, 1950 RIO GRANDE FLOODWAY, N. MEX. (See Section 8 of Text) Channel rectification, levee enlargement and construction, and bank stabilization on Rio Grande between river mile 123 and 394 (See Table 17D.) TRUTH OR CONSEQUENCES (HOT SPRINGS), N. MEX. (See Section 8 of Text) June 30, 1948 Approved comprehensive plan for Rio Grande Basin is set forth in the Report of the Chief of Engineers dated April 15, 1948, for flood control of Rio Grande Basin. May 17, 1950 In addition to previous authorizations, the completion of the plan approved in the Flood Control Act of 1948, for the Rio Grande Basin, at an estimated cost of $39,000,000. SANTA FE RIVER AND ARROYO MASCARAS, N. MEX. (See Section 9 of Text) Oct. 22, 1976 Consists of flood control improvements on the Santa Fe River, excluding any impoundment east of the existing Nichols Dam, and channel improvement on Arroyo Mascaras, and non-structural measures. SANTA ROSA DAM & LAKE, N. MEX. (See Section 10 of Text) Sept. 3, 1954 An earthfill dam with maximum height of 212 ft. and 1,950 ft. long for the purpose of flood control, irrigation and sedimentation storage located on Pecos River 7 miles north of Santa Rosa, N. Mex. Includes modification of existing Alamogordo Dam (USBR project) 29 miles southeast of Santa Rosa, N. Mex., on Pecos River. TRINIDAD LAKE, COLO. (See Section 11 of Text) July 3, 1958 and Earthfill dam 6,610 feet long and maximum of 200 feet in height with Dec. 11, 1944 controlled outlet and uncontrolled spillway for flood control, sediment storage, irrigation and recreation purposes on Purgatoire River. Authorization of Trinidad Dam provides for abrogation of channel improvement project through city ofTrinidad, Colo., at time construction of dam is initiated. Oct. 27, 1965 Relieved city of Trinidad of responsibility for cash contribution toward cost of constructing Trinidad Dam. H. Doc. 243, 81st Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 516, 81st Cong., 2nd sess. S. Doc. 94, 86th Cong. Substitute Plan - S. Doc. 94, 86th Cong., 2d sess.' Public Law 293, 88th Cong. Public Law 94-587, 94th Cong. H. Doc. 243, 81st Cong., 1st sess.' and Public Law 516, 81st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 243, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 243, 81st Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 94-587, 94th Cong. H. Doc. 339, 84th Cong., 2d sess.' Sec. 203, Public Law 780, 83d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 325, 84th Cong., 2d sess., and H. Doc. 387, 78th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 89-298, 89th Cong., Sec. 201. 1Contains latest published maps. 17-14 ALBUQUERQUE, N. MEX., DISTRICT TABLE 17-C RIO GRANDE BASIN, N. MEX. RIO GRANDE BASIN, N. MEX.: EXISTING PROJECT (See Section 8 of Text) Drainage Miles Area Total Above Nearest (square Estimated Project River Mouth Town mile) Description Cost Abiquiu Dam Rio Chama 32 Espanola, 2,147 Earthfill 325 feet high, 26,768,9343 N. Mex. 1,217,000 acre-feet capacity Jemez Canyon Dam Jemez 2 Bernalillo, 1,034 Earthfill 136 feet high, 4,213,147 N. Mex. 110,750 acre-feet capacity Rio Grande Floodway Rio Grande 123 to 3941 - - Channel rectification, 25,744,0002 levee enlargement and construction Cochiti Lake Rio Grande 3401 Cochiti, 11,695 Earthfill 251 feet high, 96,900,000 N. Mex. 586,000 acre-feet capacity Galisteo Dam Galisteo Creek 8 Waldo, 596 Earthfill 158 feet high, 14,220,053 N. Mex. 89,000 acre-feet capacity 'River mile 0 is at intersection of New Mexico-Texas State Line with international boundary at E1 Paso, Texas. 2Does not include non-Federal costs. 3Includes $5,355,000 major rehabilitation, $138,900 for recreation facilities. RIO GRANDE FLOODWAY, N. MEX.: TABLE 17-D EXISTING PROJECT (See Section 8E of Text) Location Estimated Reach (river miles)' Cost Truth or Consequences unit (formerly Hot Springs) 123 to 129 $14,200,000 San Acacia to Bosque del Apache unit 155 to 226 6,200,000 (1960)2 Cochiti to Rio Puerco unit (not including Albuquerque unit) 236 to 340 2,658,0003 Albuquerque unit 286 to 305 3,130,0004 Espanola Valley unit 366 to 394 (1970)5 456,0002 'River mile 0 being at intersection of New Mexico-Texas State line with international boundary at El Paso, Texas. 2Deferred for restudy. 3In addition, $1,650,000 incurred by the Bureau of Reclamation in this reach. 4In addition, $75,000 incurred by local interest in this reach. 5In addition, estimated cost to local interests is $69,000 (1970). TABLE 17-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1981 Full Report See Annual Operation & Project Report For Construction Maintenance2 Alamogordo diversion channel, Tularosa (closed) Basin, New Mexico4 1966 189,356 - Alpine, Texas3 1977 130,488 Colorado Springs, Fountain que Bouille River, Colo. (Templeton Gap Floodway) 1959 881,262 Creede, Willow Creek, Colo. (floodway) 1952 219,789 Great Bend, Kansas2 1977 883,972 Pecos, Texas3 1977 480,273 Pinon Canyon Dam, Trinidad, Colo. (Sec. 212)1 - 130,678 Pueblo Arkansas River, Colo. (floodway levee extension)' 1954 201,958 Socorro diversion channel, tributaries of Rio Grande, New Mexico' 1965 2,259,328 1Completed. 2Responsibility of local interests. 3Inactive. 4Deferred. 17-15 LITTLE ROCK, ARK., DISTRICT* This District comprises northern, western, and southwestern portions of Arkansas and a portion of southern Missouri embraced in drainage basins of Arkansas River and tributaries above and exclusive of Pine Bluff, Ark., and below mouth of Poteau River, near Fort Smith, Ark., drainage basins of the Arkansas portion of Little River and tributaries above its mouth near Fulton, Ark., and drainage basins of White River and tributaries above Peach Orchard Bluff, Ark. In addition, Little Rock District has responsibility for planning, design, construction, and operation and maintenance of that portion of McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System below Pine Bluff. Memphis District is responsible for navigation maintenance on White River below Newport, Ark., and mouth of Wild Goose Bayou. White River downstream from mouth of Wild Goose Bayou is a part of McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Arkansas River Basin, Ark., Okla., and Kans. . ... 2. Bank Stabilization & Channel Rectification Ark ... 3. David D. Terry Lock and Dam (No. 6), Ark . . . . . 4. Lock and Dam No. 2, Ark...... 5. Lock and Dam No. 3, Ark... 6. Lock and Dam No. 4, Ark... 7. Lock and Dam No. 5, Ark.. 8. Lock and Dam No. 9, Ark.. 9. Lock and Dam No. 13, Ark.. 10. Maintenance and Repair Fleet and Marine Terminals, Ark. .. 11. Murray Lock and Dam (No. 7), Ark . ... ..... ... . ..... 12. Norrell Lock and Dam (No. 1) and Entrance Channel, Ark.......... 13. Toad Suck Ferry Lock and Dam (No. 8), Ark. ................ 14. Other Authorized Navigation Projects .... ..... .... ....... Flood Control 15. Little River Basin (Little Rock District) ............ .............. 16. White River Basin, (Little Rock District) .......................... 17. Blue Mountain Lake, Ark . ... 18. Clearwater Lake, Mo ... Page 19. 18-2 20. 21. 18-2 22. 23. .18-2 24. 18-2 25. .18-2 18-2 18-3 18-3 18-3 .. 18-3 .18-3 ...18-3 18-3 18-3 18-3 18-3 .18-4 .18-4 26. 27. Flood Control (cont) DeQueen Lake, Ark... Dierks Lake, Ark. Gillham Lake, Ark. Millwood Lake, Ark.. Nimrod Lake, Ark. Pine Mountain Lake, Ark.. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects Other Authorized Flood Control Projects Flood Control Work under Special Authorization Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 28. Beaver Lake, Ark. 29. Bull Shoals Lake, Ark. 30. Dardanelle Lock and Dam (No. 10), Ark. 31. Greers Ferry Lake, Ark. 32. Norfork Lake, Ark. 33. Ozark-Jeta Taylor Lock and Dam (No. 12), Ark. 34. Table Rock Lake, Mo. General Investigations 35. Surveys. 36. Collection and Study of Basic Data. *All costs and financial statements for projects are listed in table 18-A at end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at end of this chapter. 18-1 18-4 18-4 18-5 18-5 18-5 18-5 18-5 18-5 18-5 .18-6 18-6 18-6 18-6 18-6 18-6 18-7 18-7 18-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 Navigation 1. ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN, ARK., OKLA., AND KANS. Location. Arkansas River rises in Rocky Mountains near Leadville, Colo., and flows southeastward 1,396 miles through Colorado, Kansas, Oklahoma, and Arkansas to join Mississippi River 559 miles above Head of Passes, La. (See Geological Survey state maps, scale 1:24,000, and flood control and navigation maps of Mississippi River, Cairo, Ill., to Gulf of Mexico, 1970 edition scale 1:62,500.) Previous projects. For details see page 1066, Annual Report for 1932, and pages 744, 864, and 881, Annual Report for 1943. Existing project. Provides for improvement of Arkansas River Basin by construction of coordinated developments for navigation, hydroelectric power, flood control, water supply, sediment control, recreation, and fish and wildlife propagation. McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System provides a channel of 9 feet deep and 445.3 miles long, beginning at mouth of White River, which enters Mississippi River 599 miles above Head of Passes, La., thence 9.8 miles upstream to mouth of Wild Goose Bayou; thence 9.2 miles by a land cut, designated as Arkansas Post Canal to mile 42 (1943 survey) on Arkansas River; thence 376.0 miles along channel of latter stream to mouth of Verdigris River at navigation mile 395.0; thence 50.3 miles up Verdigris River to head of navigation at Catoosa, Okla. Waterway is canalized throughout its length by 17 locks and dams with total lift of 420 feet. Dardanelle, Ozark-Jeta Taylor, Robert S. Kerr, and Webbers Falls are multiple-purpose projects including power. Lock chambers are 110 by 600 feet. A minimum channel width of 150 feet is provided for Verdigris River 225 feet for San Bois Creek, 250 feet for Arkansas River, and 300 feet for Arkansas Post Canal and White River. Other coordinated developments consist of 15 lakes, of which 13 are in Tulsa District, Kansas and Oklahoma, and two in Little Rock District. Pertinent data and estimated Federal cost are summarized in Tables 18-C and 18-D, Arkansas River Basin; Ark., Okla., and Kans.: Navigation/Lakes. For authorization see Table 18-B, Authorizing Legislation. Local cooperation. For McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System, local interests must provide adequate terminal and transfer facilities and bear increased cost of maintenance and operation of all altered rail and highway routes, including bridges and appurtenances, utilities, and other existing improvements, other than federally owned. For lakes see requirements for each individual lake. Terminal facilities. Public port facilities were in operation at Pine Bluff- Jefferson County, Little Rock, and Fort Smith, Ark., and Muskogee and Catoosa (Tulsa-Rogers County), Okla. Port authorities have been organized to develop public facilities at North Little Rock, Dardanelle- Russellville, Morrilton, Clarksville, Ozark and Van Buren, Ark., and Sallisaw, Okla. Private and commercial port facilities are complete and in operation or being built at 32 locations in Arkansas and at 19 locations in Oklahoma along the improved waterways. Operations and results during fiscal year. Blue Mountain, Canton, Dardanelle Lock and Dam (No. 10), Dardanelle Marine Terminal, David D. Terry Lock and Dam (No. 6), Elk City, Eufaula, Fall River, Fort Gibson, Keystone, W. D. Mayo Lock and Dam (No. 14), Chouteau Lock and Dam (No. 17), Newt Graham Lock and Dam (No. 18), Robert S. Kerr Lock and Dam and Reservoir (No. 15), Webbers Falls Lock and Dam (No. 16), and Oologah; Locks and Dams Nos. 2, 3, 4, 5, 9, and 13, Markham Ferry, Murray Lock and Dam (No. 7), Nimrod, Norrell Lock and Dam (No. 1), Ozark-Jeta Taylor Lock and Dam (No. 12), Pensacola, Pine Bluff Marine Terminal, Robert S. Kerr Marine Terminal, Tenkiller Ferry, Toad Suck Ferry Lock and Dam (No. 8), Toronto, and Wister were in operation. Construction is complete on bank stabilization. For details of McClellan- Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System and lakes in Oklahoma and Kansas, see report of Tulsa District. Details of McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System and lakes in Arkansas are shown on following pages. Condition at end of fiscal year. See Tables 18-C and 18-D, Arkansas River Basin; Ark., Okla., and Kans.: Navigation/Lakes for status for individual items, navigation project, lakes, and basin plan. 2. BANK STABILIZATION & CHANNEL RECTIFICATION, ARK. Location. Several bank stabilization and channel rectification projects are laid out in various reaches extending from fixed point to fixed point on Arkansas River from 33.7 to 362 miles above mouth and across the Arkansas-White cutoff, a 4- to 5-mile natural channel joining Arkansas and White Rivers about 18 and 12 miles above their respective mouths. Existing project. Bank stabilization and channel rectification is a part of McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System. See table 18-E for reach and location of each bank stabilization and channel rectification project. Federal cost is $119,300,184 for existing project in Little Rock District. For authorization see Table 18-B, Authorizing Legislation. Local cooperation. See requirements for entire project under Section 1. Operations and results during fiscal year. Inspection was made of all existing works, and surveys made of damaged portions. Engineering and design studies coritinued for repairs to damaged works. Condition at end of fiscal year. Emergency bank stabilization and channel rectification work on Arkansas River in Little Rock District was begun in March 1950 and completed in August 1961. Remaining bank stabilization and channel rectification work proposed for existing project was begun in February 1961 and completed in 1979. Completed work is 100 percent of that proposed for existing project in Little Rock District. Condition of each reach is summarized in table 18-F. 3. DAVID D. TERRY LOCK AND DAM (NO. 6), ARK. Location, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal facilities. See Section 1. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance continued. Condtion at end of fiscal year. Construction began in January 1965 and lock and dam was placed in operation in August 1968. 4. LOCK AND DAM NO. 2, ARK. Location, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal facilities. See Section 1. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in May 1963. Lock was placed in operation in April 1967 and dam was placed in operation in March 1968. 5. LOCK AND DAM NO. 3, ARK. Location, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal facilities. See Section 1. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in May 1963 and lock and dam was placed in operation in December 1968. 6. LOCK AND DAM NO. 4, ARK. Location, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal facilities. See Section 1. Operations and results during fiscal year. A contract for addition to resident office was awarded 28 Sep. '80 for $214,923. Operation and maintenance continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in May 1964 and lock and dam was placed in operation in December 1968. 18-2 LITTLE ROCK, ARK., DISTRICT 7. LOCK AND DAM NO. 5, ARK. Location, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal facilities. See Section 1. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance continued. Lock was unwatered, inspected, and repaired September 14-21, 1981. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in November 1964 and lock and dam was placed in operation in December 1968. 8. LOCK AND DAM NO. 9, ARK. Location, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal facilities. See Section 1. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in April 1965 and lock and dam was placed in operation in July 1969. 9. LOCK AND DAM NO. 13, ARK. Location, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal facilities. See Section 1. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in October 1965 and lock and dam was placed in operation in April 1969. Bridge across dam was completed in July 1978. 10. MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR FLEET AND MARINE TERMINALS, ARK. Location, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal facilities. See Section 1. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of Pine Bluff Marine Terminal began March 1968 and it was placed in operation in April 1969. Construction of Dardanelle Marine Terminal began June 1968 and it was placed in operation in November 1969. 11. MURRAY LOCK AND DAM (NO. 7), ARK. Location, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal facilities. See Section 1. Operations and results during fiscal year. Recreation facilities are complete except for cost sharing items under the 710 program. Operation and maintenance continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in November 1964 and lock and dam was placed in operation in October 1969. 12. NORRELL LOCK AND DAM (NO. 1) AND ENTRANCE CHANNEL, ARK. Location, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal facilities. See Section 1. Recommended modification. A Supplement to the General Design Memorandum on the Entrance Channel presenting the results of design and planning studies to modify the existing entrance channel was submitted in June 1981 and approved in August 1981. The recommended modification would consist of construction of additional contraction works to relieve restrictions to navigation in this reach of the waterway during low-flow conditions on the White River and low stages on the Mississippi River. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in May 1963 and lock and dam was placed in operation in June 1967. 13. TOAD SUCK FERRY LOCK AND DAM (NO. 8), ARK. Location, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal facilities. See Section 1. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance continued. A contract was awarded in June 1980 (and is 76 percent complete) for construction of the dam spillway, and outlet works for a reservoir to provide a source of water supply for the city of Conway, Arkansas, which will replace existing source adversely affected by construction of the McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System. Estimated cost of the reservoir is $32,944,000. The contract to relocate Arkansas Highway 92 (awarded in September 1979) out of the Conway Water Supply Lake area is 92 percent complete. A construction contract to install 10.9 miles of 36-inch water transmission pipeline for the Conway Water Supply Project was awarded in February 1981 and is 55 percent complete. A clearing contract for the Conway Water Supply Lake area was awarded in August 1981 and is 14 percent complete. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in July 1965 and lock and dam was placed in operation in November 1969. 14. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS See Table 18-G, Other Authorized Navigation Projects. Flood Control 15. LITTLE RIVER BASIN (Little Rock District) Location. Improvements are on Little River and tributaries, Arkansas. More definite location of individual items is shown in Table 18-I, Little River Basin. Existing project. Part of a six-lake system for flood control and other purposes in the Little River Basin. The system consists of four lakes in Arkansas: Millwood on the main stem, Dierks on the Saline River, DeQueen on the Rolling Fork River, and Gillham on the Cossatot River, and two lakes in Oklahoma: Broken Bow on the Mountain Fork River and Pine Creek on the Little River. Under a District boundary change, effective 1 October 1980, the four projects in this system in Arkansas were reassigned from the Tulsa District to the Little Rock District. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, and Section 301, Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, apply. Tri-Lakes (DeQueen, Gillham, and Dierks) Water District furnished a resolution of intent to repay costs allocated to water supply storage. The Southwest Arkansas Water District is currently repaying costs allocated to water supply storage at Millwood Lake. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance of projects continued. See individual projects for details. Condition at end of fiscal year. Millwood, DeQueen, Gillham, and Dierks Lakes are complete and in operation. 16. WHITE RIVER BASIN (LITTLE ROCK DISTRICT) Location. Improvements are on White River and tributaries, Arkansas and Missouri. More definite location of individual items is shown in Table 18-I, White River Basin. Existing project. A general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in White River Basin. Plan now includes seven lakes, of which two are flood control only projects and five are multiple-purpose projects. Beaver, Table Rock, Bull Shoals, Norfork, Clearwater, Greers 18-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 Ferry, and Bell Foley Lakes were selected and approved for construction by Chief of Engineers, and individual reports on these seven lakes are presented on subsequent pages. Bell Foley Lake was reclassified to inactive in June 1977. Lakes in plan are listed in Table 18-I, White River Basin. For authorization see Table 18-B, Authorizing Legislation. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies, Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, applies to Beaver, Greers Ferry, and Norfork. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance of projects continued. Estimated monetary flood control benefits for fiscal year attributed to Beaver, Table Rock, Bull Shoals, Norfork, and Greers Ferry Lakes for prevention of flood damages were $139,000, $326,000, $927,000, $130,000, and $29,000 respectively, a total of $1,551,000. Total flood damages prevented by lakes through September 30, 1981 amounted to $80,755,000 of which $8,949,000 accrues to Beaver, $24,543,000 to Table Rock, $31,587,000 to Bull Shoals, $10,993,000 to Norfok and $4,683,000 to Greers Ferry. Delivered 458,812,200 kilowatt-hours of electrical energy to Southwestern Power Administration for marketing, of which 63,007,600, 93,268,000, 185,122,000, 56,123,700, and 61,290,900 kilowatt-hours were generated at Beaver, Table Rock, Bull Shoals, Norfork, and Greers Ferry powerplants, respectively. During the fiscal year 28,960 acre-feet of water were released from Norfork Lake for Fish and Wildlife Service trout hatchery; 14,480 acre-feet were released from Table Rock Lake for Missouri Conservation Commission trout hatchery; 14,480 acre-feet ofwater were released from Greers Ferry Lake for US Fish and Wildlife Service trout hatchery. Beaver Water District withdrew 8,110 million gallons from Beaver Lake; and Water and Sewer Improvement District No. 3 of Mountain Home, Ark., withdrew 578 million gallons from Norfork Lake; the Community Water System, Cleburne County, Ark., withdrew 176.2 million gallons; and the city of Clinton, Ark., withdrew 256 million gallons from Greers Ferry Lake. Condition at end of fiscal year. Beaver, Table Rock, Bull Shoals, Norfork, Clearwater, and Greers Ferry Lakes are complete and in operation. Preconstruction planning is discontinued on Bell Foley. Progress on these lakes is in individual reports. Water Valley and Lone Rock Lakes have been deauthorized. The White River Fish Hatchery authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1976 would be located on White River in Carroll County, Arkansas about 9 miles northwest of the city of Eureka Springs to provide a plan of improvement for construction of trout production facilities including a fish hatchery downstream from Beaver dam. Total estimated cost is $6,000,000. 17. BLUE MOUNTAIN LAKE, ARK. Location. See Table 18-D, Arkansas River Basin, Ark., Okla., and Kans.: Lakes. Existing project. Estimated cost is $5,322,000, of which $551,000 is Code 710 funds. For further information see pages 906 and 907 of 1962 Annual Report. For authorization see Table 18-B, Authorizing Legislation. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control act of 1938 applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance of project continued. Flooding was prevented on an average of 4,430 acres of improved land during fiscal year. Estimated monetary benefits at end of fiscal year attributed to Blue Mountain Lake for prevention of flood damages were $800,000, a total of $11,100,000 to September 30, 1981. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for additional recreation sanitary facilities. Construction of project began in May 1940, and it was ready for beneficial use in March 1947. 18. CLEARWATER LAKE, MO. Location. See Table 18-1. White River Basin. Existing project. Estimated cost is $11,404,000, of which $1,666,000 is Code 710 funds. For further information see pages 897 and 898 of 1962 Annual Report. For authorization see Table 18-B, Authorizing Legislation. Recommended modification. A reconnaissance report under the Dam Safety Assurance Program was submitted in August 1979 and approved subject to comment in April 1980. The report recommends further planning and design to lengthen the emergency spillway by 350 feet at an estimated cost of $21,460,000 and to continue studies to determine the extent of the underseepage problem and seismic stability. A Comprehensive Seepage Analysis and Report and a Seismic Analysis Report were submitted in August 1981. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance of project continued. Flooding was prevented on an average of 4,350 acres of cultivated land. Estimated monetary benefits attributed to Clearwater Lake for prevention of flood damages were $1,530,000, a total of $25,128,000 to September 30, 1980. Releases made from lake during lowwater periods were sufficient to supply municipal water for Poplar Bluff and other usages. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for addition and improvement to existing sanitary recreational facilities. Construction of project began in June 1940 and was ready for beneficial use in March 1948. 19. DEQUEEN LAKE, ARK. Location. On Rolling Fork River, river mile 22.8, a tributary of Little River, in Sevier County, about 6 miles northwest of DeQueen, Ark. (See Geological Survey map for Chapel Hill, Ark., quadrangle, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. An earthfill dam, 2,360 feet long, constructed to 160, feet above streambed. An uncontrolled spillway, 200 feet wide, is about 1,400 feet east of main embankment. Outlet works consist of a gated conduit, 12 feet in diameter. The lake controls 169 square miles of drainage area and provides a total 'storage of 136,100 acre-feet (101,200 for flood control storage and 34,900 for conservation and sedimentation reserve.) Federal cost of project is 19,527,854. (See table 18-B, Little River Basin (Little Rock District)--for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, and Section 301, Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, apply. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. The structure reduced downstream flooding on an average of 3,620 acres. Lake operations for prevention of flood damages total $2,971,000 to September 30, 1981. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began April 1966 and project placed in useful operation in August, 1977. 20. DIERKS LAKE, ARK. Location. On Saline River, river mile 56.6, a tributary of Little River, about 5 miles northwest of Dierks, Howard County, Ark. (See Geological Survey map for Dierks Dam, Ark., quadrangle, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. An earthfill dam, 2,760 feet long, about 153 feet above streambed. An uncontrolled spillway 800 feet wide is in a saddle at west end of dam. Outlet works consisting of a gated 6- by 9-foot oblonig conduit, one 24-inch low-flow pipe, and one 30-inch water supply pipe are provided. The lake controls a drainage area of 114 square miles and provides for storage of 67,100 acre-feet for flood control and 29,700 acrefeet for water supply, conservation, and sedimentation reserve, a total of 96,800 acre-feet. Federal cost of project is $15,942,013. (See table 18-B, Little River Basin (Little Rock District)--for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, and Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, apply. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. A total of 218 acre-feet was made available for water supply for Tri-Lakes Water District. The structure in place reduced 18-4 LITTLE ROCK, ARK., DISTRICT flooding on an average of 2,090 acres of land. Lake operations for prevention of flood damages total $1,658,000 to September 30, 1981. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in June 1968. The embankment closure was made on May 8, 1975 and the project placed in useful operation. 21. GILLHAM LAKE, ARK. Location. Damsite is on Cossatot River, river mile 49.0, in Howard County, about 5 miles northeast of Gillham, Sevier County, Ark. (See Geological Survey map for Gillham Dam, quadrangle, Ark., quadrangle, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement see Page 19-12 of Annual Report for 1977 (Tulsa District). Federal cost of project is $17,813,508. (See Table 18-B-Little River Basin (Little Rock District)-for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, and Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, apply. Tri-Lakes Water District furnished a resolution of intent to repay costs allocated to water supply storage. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Flood damages were prevented on an average of 2,630 acres of land. Lake operations for prevention of flood damages total $3,100,000 to September 30, 1981. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in June 1963. The embankment closure was made on May 8, 1975 and the project placed in useful operation. 22. MILLWOOD LAKE, ARK. Location. On Little River, river mile 16.0, approximately 7 miles east of Ashdown, Little River County, Ark., and about 2 miles northeast of Millwood, Little River County, Ark. (See Geological Survey map for Red Bluff, Ark., quadrangle, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For description of completed imprbvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1969 (Tulsa District). Federal cost of project is $46,017,752, of which $1,791,871 is Code 710 funds. Local cooperation. Completed as required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. A total of 43,882 acre-feet of water was released from the lake for water supply to Southwest Arkansas Water District. Flooding was prevented on an average of 2,710 acres of land. Estimated monetary benefits attributed to Millwood Lake operations for prevention of flood damages total $4,086,000 to September 30, 1981. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in September 1961 and the project was placed in full flood control operation in August 1966. Work required to complete project consists of additional recreation facilities under cost sharing program. 23. NIMROD LAKE, ARK. Location. See Table 18-D, Arkansas River Basin, Ark., Okla., and Kans.: Lakes. Existing project. Estimated cost is $4,330,000, of which $558,000 is Code 710 funds. For further information see pages 908 and 909 of 1962 Annual Report. For authorization see Table 18-B, Authorizing Legislation. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance of project continued. Addition and improvement to existing recreation sanitary facilities were continued. Flooding was prevented on an average of 1,978 acres of improved land during fiscal year. Estimated monetary benefits at end of fiscal year attributed to Nimrod Lake for prevention of flood damages were $580,000 making a total of $6,037,000 to September 1981. Twenty six million gallons of water were withdrawn by the city of Plainview, Ark. from Nimrod Lake. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for addition and improvement to existing sanitary recreation facilities. Construc-tion of project began in January 1940 and was ready for beneficial use in January 1942. 24. PINE MOUNTAIN LAKE, ARK. Location. Damsite is at mile 35.7 on Lee Creek and 12 miles north of Van Buren, Ark. (See Geological Survey map Rudy NE, Ark., quadrangle, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a lake for flood control, water supply, and recrea-tion. The lake would control runoff from 168 square miles. Capacity would be 261,000 acre-feet, of which 93,100 would be for flood control, 168,000 for water supply, fish and wildlife mitigation and recreation. Estimated cost is $63,600,000, of which local interests will repay $45,500,000 for water supply storage. Project was authorized by Flood Control Act of 1965. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, and Federal Water Project Recreation Act apply. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning was discontinued pending receipt of local assurance for cost sharing. Condition at end of fiscal year. Preconstruction planning is 75 percent complete. Project is 2 percent complete. 25. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Approved regulations for operation and maintenance of flood control works, Part 208 of Title 33, Code of Federal Regulations, provide for periodic inspection of completed projects transferred to local interests for operation and maintenance. Inspections of local flood protection projects, shown in Section 21 as completed projects, were made September- November to determine extent of compliance with approved regulations for maintenance and operation of these projects. Responsible officials of improvement districts concerned were advised of inadequacies in maintenance and operation of local flood protection works under their jurisdiction where appropriate. Cost for fiscal year was $51,633. Total cost to September 30 was $719,441. 26. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See Table 18-J, Other Authorized Flood Control Projects. 27: FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation). Federal cost of advance preparation for fiscal year was $0. Emergency bank protection, (Section 14, Flood Control Act of 1946, Public Law 526, 79th Congress). White River at Oil Trough, Arkansas, local cooperation. Estimated cost is $243,000 (Contract amount is $178,900). Cost for fiscal year was $165,066. Emergency bank protection, Rolling Fork River, Sevier County Road No. 12, Arkansas, construction contract for $64,500 awarded 27 February 1981. Cost for fiscal year was $63,591. Flooding on Howell Creek and tributaries, West Plains, Missouri, study (requested by Mayor of West Plains, Missouri, on 7 October 1980) was 18-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 initiated in January 1981. Cost for fiscal year was $1,305. A Reconnaissance Report for White County Bridge Protection at Little Red River, Judsonia, Arkansas, was submitted in May 1981. Cost for fiscal year was $7,500. Emergency flood operations for the Arkansas, Black and White River Basins during FY 81. Federal cost for fiscal year was $0. Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 28. BEAVER LAKE, ARK. Location. See Table 18-I, White River Basin. Existing project. Estimated cost is $50,860,000, of which $5,799,000 is Code 710 funds. For further information see pages 788 and 789 of 1966 Annual Report. For authorization see Table 18-B, Authorizing Legislation. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 and Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, apply. Operations and results during fiscal year. Results of operation of Beaver Lake are shown in Section 24. Operation and maintenance con tinued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for addition and improvement to existing recreation sanitary facilities. Construction of project began in October 1959 and was placed in operation for flood control in December 1963, hydroelectric power generation with both units in May 1965, and water supply in January 1966. 29. BULL SHOALS LAKE, ARK. Location. See Table 18-I, White River Basin. Existing project. Estimated cost with eight generating units is $96,612,000, of which $10,886,000 is Code 710 funds. For further information see pages 725 and 726 of 1965 Annual Report. For authorization see Table 18-B, Authorizing Legislation. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance of project continued. Results of operation of Bull Shoals Lake are shown in Section 16. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for addition and improvement to existing recreation sanitary facilities. Construc tion of project began in April 1946 and was ready for beneficial use for flood control in June 1951 and generation of electrical energy in September 1952. Units 1 through 8 were placed in operation September 1952, September 1952, December 1952, June 1953, January 1962, February 1962, August 1963, and September 1963, respectively. 30. DARDANELLE LOCK AND DAM (NO. 10), ARK. Location. See Table 18-C, Arkansas River Basin; Ark., Okla., and Kans.: Navigation. Existing project. Project is a unit of McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System. Dam is 2,683 feet long and 68 feet high. It has a spillway with 20 tainter gates 50 feet long and 39 feet high. Navigation lock is 110 by 600 feet with a lift of 54 feet. Powerhouse contains four 31,000 kilowatt generators. Lake has a storage capacity of 486,200 acrefeet. Estimated cost is $86,507,000, of which $1,708,000 is Code 710 funds. For authorization see Table 18-B. Authorizing Legislation. Local cooperation. See Section 1. Operations and results during fiscal year. Pool fluctuated within 2-foot power pondage, elevation 336.00 to 338.00. Power generation continued. Installed capacity is 124,000 kilowatts. Delivered 284,280,500 kilowatthours of electrical energy to Southwestern Power Administration for marketing. Major accomplishments with regular funds: Lock was unwatered, inspected, and repaired September 14-23, 1981. Operation and maintenance continued at cost of $2,774,908. A new visitor's center and resident office is planned; the estimated cost is $1,169,385. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for addition and improvement to existing recreation sanitary facilities. Construction began June 1957. Power units were placed on line April, May, and September 1965, and January 1966. Lock was placed in operation in December 1969. 31. GREERS FERRY LAKE, ARK. Location. See Table 18-I, White River Basin. Existing project. Estimated cost is $55,125,000, of which $8,080,000 is Code 710 funds. For further information see page 740 of 1964 Annual Report. For authorization see Table 18-B, Authorizing Legislation. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 and Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, apply. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance continued. A contract to construct the visitors center was awarded September 18, 1981 in the amount of $734,890. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for addition and improvement to existing recreation sanitary facilities. Construction of project began in June 1957, was ready for beneficial use for flood control in January 1962, and power units 1 and 2 were placed in operation in March and May 1964, and water supply was placed in operation in April 1971. 32. NORFORK LAKE, ARK. Location. See Table 18-I, White River Basin. Existing project. Estimated cost is $110,747,000, of which $4,125,000 is Code 710 funds, $35,300,000 is for addition of power units 3 and 4, and $42,600,000 is for highway bridge construction. For further information see page 896 of 1962 Annual Report. For authorization see Table 18-B, Authorizing Legislation. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 and Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, apply. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance of project continued. Results of operation of Norfork Lake are shown in Section 16. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for addition and improvement to existing recreation sanitary facilities, highway bridges, and addition of power units 3 and 4. Construction of project began in October 1940, ready for beneficial use for flood control in June 1943, and for generation of electrical energy with one unit in June 1944. Second unit was added in February 1950. Water supply was added as a purpose in December 1969. A contract was awarded in April 1979 for construction of two highway bridges over Norfork Lake to replace ferries. The work is 70 percent complete. Preconstruction planning for addition of power units 3 and 4 was continued and is 90 percent complete. 33. OZARK-JETA TAYLOR LOCK AND DAM (NO. 12), ARK. Location. See Table 18-C, Arkansas River Basin; Ark., Okla., and Kans.: Navigation. Existing project. Project is a unit of McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System. Dam is 2,480 feet long and 58 feet above streambed. It has a spillway with 15 tainter gates 50 feet long and 46 feet high. Navigation lock is 110 by 600 feet with a lift of 34 feet. Powerhouse contains five 20,000 kilowatt generators. Lake has a storage capacity of 148,400 acre-feet. In addition, 1 foot of power pondage is provided in Pool No. 13 between elevations 391.00 and 392.00. Estimated cost is $86,167,000 of which $400,000 is Code 710 funds. For authorization see Table 18-B, Authorizing Legislation. Local cooperation. See Section 1. Operations and results during fiscal year. Delivered 223,200 kilowatthours of electrical energy to Southwestern Power Administration for marketing. Contminued operation and maintenance. 18-6 LITTLE ROCK, ARK., DISTRICT Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in December 1964 and is complete. Project is complete except for addition and improvement to existing recreation sanitary facilities. Lock and dam was placed in operation in November 1969. Power units were placed on line as follows: Unit 1, November 1972; unit 2, August 1973; unit 3, October 1973; unit 4, December 1973, and unit 5, May 1974. Work remaining consists principally of modifications to powerplant. 34. TABLE ROCK LAKE, MO. Location. See Table 18-I, White River Basin. Existing project. Estimated cost is $71,233,000, of which $5,793,000 is Code 710 funds. For further information see page 893 of 1962 Annual Report. For authorization see Table 18-B, Authorizing Legislation. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance continued. Equipment for injection of oxygen in the power generation releases has been installed. Results of operation of Table Rock Lake are showrfin Section 16. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for addition and improvement to existing recreation sanitary facilities. Construction of project began in October 1954, was ready for beneficial use for flood control in November 1958, and for generation of electrical energy with units 1 and 2 in May 1959. Units 3 and 4 were added in April and June 1961. General Investigations 35. SURVEYS Cost for the fiscal year was $1,556,666, of which $517,235 was for navigation studies, $784,673 was for flood damage prevention studies, S$150,054 was for review of authorized projects, $84,439 was for comprehensive studies and $20,265 was for coordination studies with other agencies. An Interim Feasibility Report for Water Resource Development, Fourche Bayou Basin, in the vicinity of Little Rock, Arkansas, was submitted in October 1979 and approved in December 1980. Cost for the fiscal year was $7,468. Recommended modification. The installation of a 43,750 kw hydroelectric power plant at this existing low head lock and dam has been studied. An interim Survey Report was submitted in October 1980 and approved subject to comment (reduction of the installed capacity to 37,500 kw) in June 1981. The estimated cost of the modified project is $83,000,000, of which $8,300,000 is non-Federal. 36. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Three flood insurance studies were completed for one city and two counties in Ark. Flood Plain data and technical services and guidance were furnished to other Federal, state and local agencies and individuals. Cost for the fiscal year was $171,190. See Table 18-K, Flood Insurance Studies Completed During Fiscal Year. Cost for Inspection of Dams for the fiscal year was $165,027, of which $149,304 was for the National Program. During the fiscal year, 100 stream gaging stations were operated, of which 67 were operated cooperatively by Geological Survey and Corps, and the remaining 33 by the Corps. Suspended sediment samples were collected at 17 stations during the fiscal year in cooperation with Geological Survey, and suspended loads were determined at certain stations. One hundred and twelve rainfall and/or river reporting stations were operated in a cooperative program by National Weather Service and Corps for use in forecasting streamflow for flood warning and operation of lake projects. Records also were collected at certain hydroclimatic rainfall stations under a cooperative program of the two agencies. General hydrologic studies relating to streamflow frequency and distribution were continued. Cost for the fiscal year was $3,923. 18-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 18-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to in Text Project Funding FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 Sept. 31, 1981 1. Arkansas River New Work Basin, Ark., Okla., & Kans. 2. Bank Stabilization & Channel Rectification, Ark. 3-13. Navigation Locks & Dams, Ark. 15. Little River Basin, (Little Rock Dist.) 16. White River Basin (Little Rock District) 17. Blue Mountain Lake, Ark. 18. Clearwater Lake, Mo. Approp. Navigation Cost Dams Navigation Maint. Approp. Dams Navigation Cost Dams Navigation Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Special Funds Other Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Other Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost $ 4,315,125 -279 4,315,404 4,907,070 1,467 4,905,603 32,078,724 6,825,800 25,252,924 32,260,081 6,820,150 25,431,931 8,705 4,173,000 4,159,272 9,356,000 9,188,411 2,221,419 2,076,797 1,431,630 1,712,097 1,182,207 941,168 11,421,500 11,333,981 410,900 393,512 96,000 139,216 847,400 840,511 $ 3,977,900 562,800 3,415,100 3,699,197 423,158 3,276,039 36,165,433 7,828,820 28,336,613 32,667,064 6,915,709 25,715,355 $ 5,672,433 342,322 5,330,111 6,169,941 266,723 5,903,218 32,863,209 6,159,147 26,704,062 32,725,494 6,471,861 26,253,633 11,261,0 -28,5 11,289,5 10,602,3 255,8 10,346,4 40,003,4 7,167,6 32,835,8 40,303,5 7,696,9 32,606,6 12,752 4,173,000 2,067,637 11,197,281 10,646,597 3,019,797 2,133,764 1,964,600 2,037,731 697,300 672,942 13,545,367 12,998,872 2,200 959 560,400 527,727 16,400 86,581 1,692,667 1,246,855 4,230,000 4,626,391 11,058,300 9,939,392 96,100 584,458 2,561,280 2,092,845 10,721,700 11,711,320 12,217,000 12,759,439 1,221 467,092 514,307 2,000 10,982 2,002,000 1,863,180 11,290,0 10,332,4 11,546,8 12,815,3 15,8 91,3 1,898,8 2,332,5 11,780,0 11,717,0 13,288,0 13,910,8 617,0 600,2 60,0 59,7 1,886,0 2,403,9 )61 $1,442,155,075 00 149,999,481 i61 1,292,155,594 360 1,440,940,560 368 149,958,787 92 1,290,981,773 00 375,934,300 500 83,590,025 300 292,344,275 66 373,079,169 )23 83,342,250 543 289,736,919 - 291,106 - 291,106 - 1,609,842 - 1,609,842 - 19,926,755 - 19,926,755 - 531,336 - 531,336 - 119,300,184 - 119,300,184 - 4,561,666 - 4,561,666 )00 404,747,4731 35 403,682,4941 300 119,314,987 340 118,469,088 - 973,385 - 963,567 - 531,336 - 531,336 50 99,357,550 74 99,315,772 34 17,363,9608 10 16,595,4338 )00 320,214,673' )83 319,632,234' )00 148,966,769 .20 147,823,969 - 5,069,974 - 5,069,954 00 6,501,730 49 6,477,747 )00 10,386,9542 49 10,400,1532 )00 13,029,622 20 12,914,870 18-8 LITTLE ROCK, ARK., DISTRICT TABLE 18-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to in Text Project Funding FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 Sept. 30, 1981 19. DeQueen Lake, New Work Little River Basin, 20. Dierks Lake, Little River Basin, Ark. 21. Gillham Lake, Little River Basin, Ark. 22. Millwood Lake, Little River Basin, Ark. 23. Nimrod Lake, Ark. 24. Pine Mountain Lake, Ark. 28. Beaver Lake, Ark. 29. Bull Shoals Lake, Ark. 30. Dardanelle Lock & Dam (No. 10), Ark. 31. Greers Ferry Lake, Ark. 32. Norfork Lake, Ark. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 1,309,000 1,611,066 497,200 478,154 1,000 3,888 369,000 410,778 25,000 503,069 253,700 274,740 -27,300 15,741 844,700 874,059 1,591 493,800 497,060 20,175 210,356 158,000 116,643 1,416,400 1,411,515 114,500 91,062 2,605,000 2,408,250 00 2,046,100 2,058,623 293,000 207,842 1,932,700 2,051,869 100,000 127,140 2,133,000 2,274,585 60,000 338,827 409,900 406,168 717,500 663,505 26,000 232,920 322,000 279,230 10,100 12,711 1,111,880 743,942 -2,802 1,985 641,900 637,677 166,000 119,846 59,600 48,838 1,949,000 1,715,989 28,000 29,542 2,757,000 2,702,649 61,000 6,110 2,447,681 2,312,381 115,000 135,809 2,560,500 2,352,224 200,206 263,349 2,382,800 2,231,832 35,000 36,462 365,550 377,116 568,( 531,9 184 345,592 416,151 3,815 275,941 319,598 15,850 63 911,751 1,219,645 11,146 530,067 569,606 499,0 454,3 402,0 404,( 14,( 1,341, 1,097,7 571,( 570,1 61,920 62,3 1,397,0 1,702,1 2,803,000 2,448,917 1,127,000 1,173,061 2,470,000 2,549,462 -156,900 3,698 2,364,000 2,521,094 11,074,000 11,627,263 1,749,000 1,826,434 399 1 )00 1,661, [71 1,644,( - 30,( - 31,8 2,487,0 3,053,3 2,810,8 -2,C 2,628,0 2,528,9 11,690,0 11,627,3 2,190,0 1,911,5 - 19,533,853 - 19,527,854 300 1,860,6508 340 1,800,8438 - 15,943,904 - 15,942,013 )00 2,541,683' 364 2,482,1658 - 17,824,711 39 17,813,547 )00 1,926,525 394 1,615,584 - 46,055,082 606 46,032,358 )00 11,035,1028 759 10,696,8418 - 3,980,627 - 3,980,627 )00 7,561,842 168 7,547,906 - 1,432,331 - 1,432,331 - 46,085,833 191 46,085,641 )00 18,478,959 340 18,411,975 )00 88,857,611' 345 88,854,692. )00 33,045,073 396 32,918,663 - 84,270,1246 - 84,261,2406 100 26,984,313 - 26,822,780 - 49,793,881 )21 48,786,388 )00 24,788,718 371 24,556,350 )00 56,395,929 319 56,187,723 )00 26,835,791 X10 26,399,925 18-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 18-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to in Text Project Funding FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 Sept. 30, 1981 33. Ozark-Jeta Taylor New Work Lock & Dam (No. Approp. -166,000 26,100 - - 85,627,4128 12), Ark. Cost 375,176 976 - - 85,620,9658 Maint. Approp. 1,888,700 2,611,281 1,906,000 5,249,000 20,829,842 Cost 1,746,122 2,225,256 2,281,417 3,527,631 20,846,488 34. Table Rock New Work Lake, Mo. Approp. 425,000 97,300 -197,400 - 67,244,388' Cost 259,265 108,823 6,978 - 67,224,388' Maint. Approp. 2,377,000 3,203,400 1,902,000 2,436,000 32,788,606 Cost 2,347,251 2,749,323 2,397,643 2,368,383 32,788,606 1. Includes $77,762 prior to 1952 and $1,552,416 for general studies. 2. Includes $47,103 Public Works acceleration funds. 3. Includes $491,928 Public Works acceleration funds. Does not include $207,491 appropriation and $180,749 cost for Jacksonport State Park, Ark., including $107,267 contributed funds. 4. Includes $259,812 Public Works acceleration funds. 5. Includes $402,162 for general studies. 6. Includes $168,012 for general studies. 7. Includes $185,513 Public Works acceleration funds. 8. Excludes $41,400 special recreation use fees funds as follows: Millwood Lake 26,400 Dierks Lake 10,000 DeQueen Lake 5,000 18-10 LITTLE ROCK, ARK., DISTRICT TABLE 18-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents June 28, 1938 August 18, 1941 July 24, 1946 July 24, 1946 June 30, 1948 May 17, 1950 July 14, 1960 1965 June 22, 1936 December 22, 1944 October 27, 1965 June 28, 1938 August 18, 1941 ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN, ARK., OKLA., & KANS. (See Section 1 of Text) Approved General comprehensive plan: Mannford Reservoir, Okla. Oologah Lake, Okla. Canton Lake, Okla. Tenkiller Ferry Lake, Okla. Wister Lake, Okla. Blue Mountain Lake, Ark. Nimrod Lake, Ark. Modified comprehensive plan to include reservoirs in Grand (Neosho) River Basin, Okla., and Mo., and in Verdigris River Basin: Markham Ferry Reservoir, Okla. Fort Gibson Lake, Okla. Pensacola Reservoir Lake O' The Cherokees, Okla. Fall River Lake, Kans. Elk City Lake, Kans. Toronto Lake, Kans. Neodosha Lake, Kans. Authorized Chief of Engineers to provide in the Canton Lake 69,000 acre-feet of irrigation storage, subject to certain conditions. Approved multiple-purpose plan: Oologah Lake, Okla. Markham Ferry Reservoir, Okla. Fort Gibson Lake, Okla. Blackburn Reservoir, Okla. Mannford Reservoir, Okla. Taft Reservoir, Okla. Bank stabilization Dardanelle Lock and Dam, Ark. Eufaula Lake, Okla. Navigation locks and dams Ozark Lock and Dam, Ark. Short Mountain Lock and Dam, Okla. Webbers Falls Lock and Dam, Okla. Tenkiller Ferry Lake, Okla. Modified Arkansas River navigation comprehensive plan to include bank protection works at Bradens Bend, Okla. Modified comprehensive plan authorized in 1938 Flood Control Act and multiple-purpose plan authorized in River and Harbor Act of 1946 to provide for substituting Keystone Lake for Mannford, Blackburn, and Taft Reservoirs. Authorized incorporation of River and Harbor and Flood Control plans into a single plan of development and made all previous authorizations applicable to combined plan of development. Pine Mountain Dam and Lake authorized for construction. LITTLE ROCK LEVEE, ARK. (EAST END-FOURCHE BAYOU) Levees to provide flood protection to people and city property. Modified local flood protection project to raise grade and protect additional areas. Authorized 45,000 g.p.m. pump station and excavated storage area of 164 acre-feet. WHITE RIVER BASIN (LITTLE ROCK DISTRICT) (See Section 16 of Text) Approved comprehensive plan for White River Basin: Lone Rock Lake, Ark., Norfork Lake, Ark., Clearwater Lake, Mo., Water Valley Lake, Ark., Bell Foley Lake, Ark., Greers Ferry Lake, Ark., and White River emergency. Modified comprehensive plan to include Bull Shoals Lake, Ark., and Mo., Table Rock Lake, Mo., and Ark., and Norfork Lake, Ark., and Mo. (power). 18-11 Flood Control Com. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 107 and 440, 76th Cong. 1st sess. H. Doc. 758, 79th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 107, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 270, 89th Cong., Flood Control Act of 1965 (Title II, Public Law 89-298) H. Doc. 308, 74th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 447, 78th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 55, 89th Cong., 1st sess. Flood Control Com. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 917, 76th Cong., 3d sess. H. Doc. 290, 77th Cong., 1st sess. REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 18-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents September 3, 1954 Authorized power in Greers Ferry Reservoir and added H. Doc. 499, 83d Cong., Beaver Lake to the plan. 2d sess. 1960 Jacksonport State Park in Jackson County, River and Harbor Act Arkansas. Improvements along the White River of 1960 as amended for recreation and navigation and the protection Section 107 of the park which is historically significant. October 23, 1962 Authorizing clearing and straightening of channel for H. Doc. 352, 87th Cong., Village Creek, Jackson and Lawrence Counties. 2d sess. March 1, 1974 Authorizing highway bridge construction across Flood Control Com. Norfork Lake. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. October 22, 1976 White River Fish Hatchery, Arkansas provides for Water Resources Development trout production facilities downstream from Act of 1976, P.L. 94-587, Beaver Dam. Sec. 105 VILLAGE CREEK, WHITE RIVER, AND MAYBERRY LEVEE DISTRICT, ARK. June 22, 1936 Approved levee protection. H. Doc. 102, 73d Cong., 1st sess. July 14, 1960 Modified existing project to add interior drainage in H. Doc. 225, 86th Cong., accordance with plan I, and directed study of plan III. 1st sess. October 23, 1962 Modified project to provide a pumping plant. H. Doc. 577, 87th Cong., 2d sess. RED RIVER BELOW DENISON DAM INCLUDING LITTLE RIVER BASIN, OKLA. AND ARK. (See Section 15 of Text) July 24, 1946 Construct Boswell, Hugo, and Millwood Lakes, and Bank H. Doc. 602, 79th Cong., Stabilization. 2d sess. July 3, 1958 Modified Millwood: Construct Pine Creek, Lukfata, Broken H. Doc. 170, 85th Cong., Bow, DeQueen,Gillham, Dierks Lakes 1st sess. 18-12 TABLE 18-C ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN; ARK., OKLA., AND KANS.: NAVIGATION (See Section 1 of Text) Feature LITTLE ROCK DISTRICT Norrell L&D No. 1 Lock No. 2 Dam No. 2 L&D No. 3 L&D No. 4 L&D No. 5 David D. Terry L&D No. 6 Murray L&D No. 7 Toad Suck Ferry L&D No. 8 L&D No. 9 Elevation Char- Upper Depth on Miter acter Lock Pool Sill of Dimension Lift (feet, Upper Lower Founda- (feet) (feet) MSL) (feet) (feet) tion Miles Upstream from Mouth - 10.3 13.3 40.5 50.2 66.0 86.3 108.1 125.4 155.9 176.9 Miles to Nearest Town 8 east of Arkansas Post, Ark. 6 east of Arkansas Post, Ark. 3 southeast Arkansas Post, Ark. 5 north of Grady, Ark. 7 east of Pine Bluff, Ark. 4 southeast of Redfield, Ark. 12 southeast of Little Rock, Ark. 6 northwest of Little Rock, Ark. 6 west of Conway, Ark. 3 southwest of Morrilton, Ark. 110 by 600 30 max. 142 110 by 600 20 nom. 162 28 max. 110 by 600 20 182 110 by 600 14 196 110 by 600 17 213 110 by 600 18 231 110 by 600 18 249 110 by 600 16 265 110 by 600 19 -287 16 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 Kind of Dam Fixed overflow Movable Movable Movable Movable Movable Movable Movable Movable Type of Construction Concrete Gated concrete spillway with embankment ends Gated concrete spillway with embankment ends Gated concrete spillway with embankment ends Gated concrete spillway with embankment ends Gated concrete spillway with embankment ends Gated concrete spillway with embankment ends Gated concrete spillway with embankment ends Gated concrete spillway with embankment ends Year Opened to Navigation 1967 1967 1968 1968 1968 1968 1968 1969 1969 1969 Total Estimated Cost $33,063,0002 40,317,000 33,839,000 40,861,000 29,624,000 61,660,000 33,083,000 63,835,000 33,074,000 a x] d3 yF n, y3 15 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 Piles in sand Piles in sand Piles in sand Piles in sand Piles in sand Clay Piles in sand Shale Shale Shale TABLE 18-C (Continued) Miles Upstream from Feature Dardanelle L&D No. 10 L&D No. 11 Ozark-Jeta Taylor L&D (No. 12) L&D No. 13 TULSA DISTRICT x L&D No. 13 (part) W. D. Mayo L&D No. 14 Robert S. Kerr L&D No. 15 Webbers Falls L&D No. 16 Chouteau L&D No. 17 Newt Graham L&D No. 18 Mouth - 205.5 256.8 292.8 319.6 336.2 366.6 401.4 421.6 2 nor ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN; ARK., OKLA., AND KANS.: NAVIGATION (See Section 1 of Text) Elevation Char- Upper Depth on Miter acter Lock Pool Sill of Kind Miles to Dimension Lift (feet, Upper Lower Founda- Dam Nearest Town (feet) (feet) MSL) (feet) (feet) tion rthwest of 110 by 600 54 338 18 14 Sandstone Movable Dardanelle, Ark. Deleted 1 east of Ozark, Ark. 7 east of Fort Smith, Ark. 4 east of Redland, Okla. 1 north of Cowlington, Okla. 1 northwest of Gore, Okla. 4 northwest of Okay, Okla. 8 southwest of Inola, Okla. 110 by 600 34 110 by 600 20 110 by 600 20 110 by 600 48 110 by 600 30 110 by 600 21 110 by 600 21 370 392 412 460 490 511 532 18 18 14 18 19 15 15 15 14 15 14 16 14 14 Sandstone and shale Sandstone and shale Rock Rock Rock Rock Rock Movable Movable Movable Movable Movable Movable Movable Year Opened to Total Navi- Estimated gation Cost 1969 86,507,000 1969 86,167,000 1969 $47,879,000 e Type of Construction Gated concrete spillway with embankment ends Gated concrete spillway with embankment ends Gated concrete spillway with embankment ends Gated concrete spillway with embankment ends Gated concrete spillway with embankment ends Gated concrete spillway with embankment ends Gated concrete spillway with embankment ends Gated concrete spillway with embankment ends 1970 1970 1970 1970 1970 1970 6,858,000 32,655,000 94,578,237 83,738,227 31,619,000 44,355,000 0 0 II 0 z z C12 cC o r r TABLE 18-C (Continued) ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN; ARK., OKLA., AND KANS.: NAVIGATION (See Section 1 of Text) Additional features entering into cost of project Little Rock District: Bank stabilization and channel rectification, mile 33.7 to 362 and Arkansas-White Cutoff, 100 percent complete Maintenance and repair fleet and marine terminals, 99 percent complete. Total, Little Rock District Navigation aids (US Coast Guard) Tulsa District: Bank stabilization and channel rectification, Short Mountain to Fort Smith, complete Maintenance and repair fleet and marine terminals, complete . Subtotal 1. Navigation mileage from mouth of White River except Dam No. 2 is 40.5 miles above mouth of Arkansas River. 2. Includes cost of entrance channel. 3. Includes $3,217,000 Code 710 funds. 4. Detail report of individual features in Tulsa District Report. $119,300,184 7,528,000 716,737,184$ 2,268,000 Upstream Lakes: Oologah, 90.2 miles upstream from mouth, Verdigris River complete Keystone, 638.8 miles upstream from mouth, Arkansas River, complete Eufaula, 27 miles upstream from mouth, Canadian River, complete Subtotal . Total, Tulsa District .... Total Project Cost 99.8 percent complete $ 46,689,329' 123,126,1738 121,801,747' 291,617,249 600,870,7518 $1,319,875,935 12,700,038 2,750,000 $309,253,502' 5. Includes $10,065,000 for added water supply facilities, and $13,994 Code 710 funds. 6. Includes $4,022,658 Code 710 funds. 7. Includes $23,000 Code 710 funds. 8. Includes $448,656 Code 710 funds. 9. Includes $551,900 Code 710 funds. c-1 r Ja T y TABLE 18-D ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN, ARK., OKLA., AND KANS.: LAKES (See Section 1 of Text) Miles Drainage Height Reservoir Power Year or Total Above Area of Dam Capacity Development Percent Estimated Lake and State River Mouth Nearest Town (sq mi) (feet) Type (acre-feet) (kilowatts) Complete Cost Blue Mountain, Ark. Petit Jean 74.4 Paris, Ark. 488 115 Earthfill 257,900 _ 1947 $ 5,322,000 Canton, Okla. North Canadian 384.3 Canton, Okla. 12,483 68 Earthfill 383,300 - 1948 10,919,727 Elk City, Kans. Elk 8.7 Independence, Kans. 634 (Table Mound) 107 Earthfill 284,300 _ 1966 19,042,990 Eufaula, Okla.' 2 Canadian 27.0 Eufaula, Okla. 47,522 114 Earthfill 3,798,000 90,000 1964 121,801,747 Fall River, Kans. Fall 54.2 Fall River, Kans. 585 94 Earthfill 256,400 - 1949 10,517,393 Fort Gibson, Okla.' ' Grand (Neosho) 7.7 Fort Gibson, Okla. 12,492 110 Concrete gravity 1,284,400 45,000 1953 63,518,378 Keystone, Okla.' 2 S Arkansas 538.8 Sand Springs, Okla. 74,506 121 Earthfill 1,836,500 70,000 1964 123,126,173 Markham Ferry, Okla.' ' Grand (Neosho) 47.4 Pryor, Okla. 11,533 90 Earthfill 444,500 100,000 1968 6,908,756 Neodesha, Kans." Verdigris 222.8 Neodesha, Kans. 1,152 74 Earthfill 90,000 - 0 18,100,000 Nimrod, Ark. Fourche La Fave 62.6 Plainview, Ark. 680 103 Concrete gravity 336,010 - 1942 4,330,000 Oologah, Okla. 2 Verdigris 90.2 Claremore, Okla. 4,339 137 Earthfill 1,519,000 - 1974 46,689,329 Pensacola, Okla.' 6 Grand (Neosho) 77.0 Disney, Okla. 10,298 147 Concrete arch 2,197,000 86,400 1940 52,126 Tenkiller Ferry, Okla." ' Illinois 12.8 Gore, Okla. 1,610 197 Earthfill 1,230,800 34,000 1953 23,961,719 Toronto, Kans. Verdigris 271.5 Toronto, Kans. 730 90 Earthfill 199,700 - 1960 13,896,324 Wister, Okla. Poteau 60.9 Wister, Okla. 993 99 Earthfill 427,900 1949 10,501,226 Subtotal, exclusive of Eufaula, Keystone, nd Oologah, 93 percent complete 187,070,639 Total, Arkansas River Basin, 98 percent domplete 1,506,946,574 1. Project includes facilities for production of hydroelectric power. 2. Cost included in navigation project. 3. Estimate includes Code 710 funds. 4. Constructed by State of Oklahoma under the name of Robert S. Kerr Dam (Lake Hudson). Estimate shown is for Federal participation. 5. Inactive. Estimate is based on 1954 price levels. 6. Constructed by State of Oklahoma under the name Grand River Dam (Lake O' The Cherokees). Estimate shown is for Federal participation. 7. Estimate includes Code 710 funds and present estimate cost of power units. 0 0 'T z LITTLE ROCK, ARK., DISTRICT TABLE 18-E BANK STABILIZATION AND CHANNEL RECTIFICATION: REACH AND LOCATION (See Section 2 of Text) Reach Location of Reach Fort Smith to Mill Creek Mountain Miles 362.0 to 327.0 Mill Creek Mountain to Morrisons Bluff Miles 327.0 to 285.0 Dardanelle Rock to Morrilton Bridge Miles 257.0 to 221.0 Morrilton Bridge to Fourche La Fave Miles 221.0 to 192.0 Fourche La Fave to Little Rock Miles 192.0 to 165.5 Little Rock to Jefferson County Free Bridge Miles 165.5 to 115.6 Jefferson County Free Bridge to Rob Roy Bridge Miles 101.7 to 89.0 Rob Roy Bridge to Arkansas Post Miles 89.0 to 42.0 Arkansas Post to Mile 33.7 Miles 42.0 to 33.7 Arkansas-White Cutoff Miles 5.0 to 0 1. River mileage from 1943 survey. 2. Arkansas-White Cutoff mileage from 1949 survey. TABLE 18-F BANK STABILIZATION AND CHANNEL RECTIFICATION: CONDITION - SEPT. 30, 1981 (See Section 2 of Text) Completed Work Work Underway Pilot Pilot Channel Revet- Channel Revet- Reach Excavation Dike ments Excavation Dike ments Date Percent (river miles) (cu. yd.) (lin. ft) (lin. ft) (cu. yd.) (lin. ft) (lin. ft) Begun Complete 362.0 to 327.0 4,013,769 106,335 171,350 - - - Jan 54 100 327.0 to 285.0 1.619,065 68,605 112,891 - - - Sep 54 100 257.0 to 221.0 12,532,782 100,746 151,780 - - - May 50 100 221.0 to 192.0 2,087,889 96,241 130,719 - - - Mar 50 100 192.0 to 165.5 450,000 84,101 111,058 - - - Mar 60 100 165.5 to 115.6 9,860,931 146,335 255,268 - - - Jun 50 100 101.7 to 0- 19,340,832 244,760 391,218 - - - 1950 100 Land and damages - - - - - - - 100 1. River mileage from 1943 survey. Includes Arkansas-White River closure structure. 18-17 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 18-G OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sept. 30, 1981 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Black River, Ark., and Mo.' 1950 $ 80,000 $ 930,324 Current River, Ark., and Mo.' 1964 17,000' 132,178 Upper White River, Ark.' ' 1952 813,197 1,788,374 White River, Ark., (above Peach Orchard Bluff)'' 1950 785,666 1. Channel adequate for existing commerce. Completion not 1, 2, and 3 disposed of in accordance with authority in Public contemplated. Law 996, 84th Cong. 2. Includes $7,000 for previous project. 4. Completed. 3. Federal operation and maintenance terminated June 30, 5. Responsibility for maintenance of project downstream 1952, due to lack of commerce. Facilities at Locks and Dams Nos. from Newport, Ark., transferred to Memphis District in FY 62. TABLE 18-H LITTLE RIVER BASIN, ARKANSAS (See Section 15 of Text) Project River Site' Nearest Town DeQueen Lake' Rolling Fork River 22.8 DeQueen, Ark. Gillham Lake' Cossatot River 49.0 Gi lham, Ark. Dierks Lake' Saline River 56.6 Dierks, Ark. Millwood Lake' Little River 16.0 Millwood, Ark. 1. Project is reported separately herein. 18-18 TABLE 18-I WHITE RIVER BASIN (See Section 16 of Text) Miles Drainage Reservoir Power Total Above Area Height of Dam Above Streambed Capacity Development Estimated Lake River Mouth Nearest Town (sq mi) and Type (acre-feet) (kilowatts) Cost- Beaver 2 White 609.0 Eureka Springs, Ark. 1,186 228 feet concrete-gravity and earthfill 1,952,000 112,000 50,860,000 Bell Foley' Strawberry 27.2 Poughkeepsie, Ark. 519 136 feet concrete-gravity and earthfill 518,000 (") 60,000,000 Bull Shoals2 White 418.6 Mountain Home, Ark. 6,036 258 feet concrete-gravity 5,408,000 340,000 96,612,000 Clearwater2 Black 257.4 Piedmont, Mo. 898 154 feet earthfill 413,000 (3) 11,404,000 Greers Ferry2 Little Red 79.0 Heber Springs, Ark. 1,146 243 feet concrete-gravity 1,844,000 96,000 55,125,000 Norfork 2 North Fork 4.8 Norfork, Ark. 1,806 216 feet concrete-gravity 1,983,000 80,550 110,747,000 Table Rock2 White 528.8 Branson, Mo. 4,020 252 feet concrete-gravity and earthfill 3,462,000 200,000 71,233,000 Village Creek, (") $9,580,000 Jackson and Village Creek, Lawrence Tributary of Counties, Ark.' White River 0-61.2 Walnut Ridge, Ark. 283 White River Fish Hatchery White 608.3 Eureka Springs, Ark. - - - () 6,000,000 Total 16,580,000 828,550 471,561,000 1. Current FY price levels unless otherwise noted. 2. For details of this project, see individual report. 3. None. 4. Inactive-reclassified June 1977. 5. Based on October 1976 price levels including $4,960,000 Non-Federal cost. N o0 | REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 18-J OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sept. 30, 1981 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Bell Foley Lake, White River, Ark.' Black River, Poplar Bluff, Mo., to Knobel, Ark.' Carden's Bottom Drainage District No. 2, Arkansas River, Ark.' Clarksville, Ark.2 Conway County Drainage and Levee District No. 1, Arkansas River, Ark.' Conway County Levee Districts Nos. 1, 2, and 8, Arkansas River, Ark. 2 Conway County Levee District No. 6, Arkansas River, Ark. 2 Crawford County Levee District, Arkansas River, Ark. 2 Crooked Creek, Lake and Levee, Ark.3 East Poplar Bluff and Poplar Bluff, Mo.2 Faulkner County Levee District No. 1, Arkansas River, Ark.2 Fort Smith, Arkansas River, Ark. 2 From North Little Rock to Gillett, Ark. (above Plum Bayou)2 Fourche Creek, Little Rock, Ark. Little Rock Levee, Ark., East End Fourche Bayou McLean Bottom Levee District No. 3, Arkansas River, Ark.' Near Dardanelle, Arkansas River, Ark. 2 Newport, White River, Ark.' North Little Rock, Arkansas River, Ark.' Petit Jean River, Ark.2 6 Roland Drainage District, Arkansas River, Ark.' Skaggs Ferry, Black River, Ark.2 South Bank Arkansas River (Head Fourche Island to Pennington Bayou), Ark.2 South Bank Arkansas River, Little Rock to Pine Bluff, Ark., Tucker Lakes' Van Buren, Arkansas River, Ark.2 Village Creek, White River, and Mayberry Levee Districts, Ark.' Village Creek, Jackson and Lawrence Counties, Ark.' West of Morrilton, Arkansas River, Ark.' 197F5 1.4n711f 1958 1951 1962 1959 1952 1952 1954 1969 1958 1941 1951 1954 1973 1975 1950 1953 1941 1958 1966 1950 1941 1964 1961 1952 1972 1977 1962 584,315 919,955 271,717 187,440 1,018,840 390,952 2,001,820 304,699 99,511 1,077,546 845,300 22,890 1,823,693 422,549 198,069 314,276 512,001 84,350 269,907 81,023 1,404,852 409,115 438,222 1,567,156 510,217 1,269,959 1. Reclassified as inactive in June 1977. 4. See H Doc. 577, 87th Cong., 2d sess., for description of 2. Completed. project. 3. Recommended to continue in deferred category in August 5. Authorized by Chief of Engineers. 1977. TABLE 18-K FLOOD INSURANCE STUDIES COMPLETED DURING FISCAL YEAR (See Section 36 of Text) Estimated Location Requesting Agency Date Completed C of E Cost Shannon Hills, Ark. City of Shannon Hills Ark. Dec 80 $ 5,180 Saline County, Ark. County of Saline, Ark. Jan 81 137,200 Pulaski County, Ark. County of Pulaski, Ark. Sep 81 178,800 Total $321,180 18-20 TULSA, OKLA., DISTRICT* This District comprises southern Kansas, a small portion of southwestern Missouri, northern Oklahoma, northern portion of Texas Panhandle, and small portions of northeastern New Mexico and southeastern Colorado, embraced in drainage basin of Arkansas River and tributaries above mouth of Poteau River, inclusive, and below mouth of Walnut Creek near Great Bend, Kans., exclusive of that portion of watershed of South Canadian River and its tributaries west of Texas-New Mexico State line; and the northern portion of Texas, and southern portion of Oklahoma embraced in drainage basin of Red River and its tributaries above Fulton, Ark. In addition, Tulsa District has responsibility for planning, design, construction, and operation and maintenance of that portion of McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System in Oklahoma. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Big and Little Sallisaw Creeks Navigation Project, Okla..........................19-3 2. Arkansas River Basin, Ark., Okla., and Kans... ........................ 19-3 3. Bank Stabilization and Channel Rectification, Arkansas River River, Ark. and Okla... ... .... ................ 19-3 5. Low Head Locks and Dams, Okla .................... 19-3 5 A. Lock and Dam No. 13, (pool) Channel Improvement, Arkansas River Basin, Okla. ............................... 19-3 5 B. W. D. Mayo Lock and Dam, Arkansas River Basin, Okla... .................. 19-3 5 C. Chouteau Lock and Dam, Verdigris River Basin, Okla ..................... 19-4 5 D. Newt Graham Lock and Dam, Verdigris River Basin, Okla..... .................. 19-4 6. Maintenance and Repair Fleet and Marine Terminals, Okla......... .............. 19-4 7. Red River Waterway, LA, AR, OK, and TX, Index, AR to Denison Dam, TX ................ 19-4 8. Other Authorized Navigation Projects .......... .................. 19-4 9. Navigation Work under Special Authorization (Poteau River) ........... . ... 19-4 Flood Control 10. Arcadia Lake, Deep Fork River Basin, Okla. ... ................... 19-4 11. Ark-Red River Basins Chloride Control ................. 19-5 11 A. Ark-Red River Basins Chloride Control, Part I- Wichita River Basin, Tex...... ............. 19-5 11 B. Ark-Red River Basins Chloride Control, Part II- Remaining Red River Basin, Okla., and Tex ................... ............ 19-5 11 C. Ark-Red River Basins Chloride Control, Part II - Arkansas River Basin, Okla........................................19-5 12. Big Pine Lake, Red River Basin, Tex.............................1.........19-5 13. Birch Lake, Verdigris River Basin, Okla..... ................................... 19-5 14. Candy Lake, Verdigris River Basin, Okla .................................... 19-6 15. Canton Lake, Arkansas River Basin, Okla................................... 19-6 16. Clayton Lake, Little River Basin, Okla ................. ........ ............ .. 19-6 17. Copan Lake, Verdigris River Basin, Okla.......... ........ 18. Council Grove Lake, Grand (Neosho) River Basin, Kans.. 19. El Dorado Lake, Walnut River Basin, Kans....... ...... ... 20. Elk City Lake, Verdigris River Basin, Kans................ 21. Fall River Lake, Verdigris River 22. Basin, Kans........ . Fort Supply Lake, North Canadian River Basin, Okla.... ...... 19-6 .......... 19-6 19..-.7...... .19-7 . 19-7 19-7 *All costs and financial statements (table 19-A) for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 19-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 Flood Control (cont) 23. Great Salt Plains Lake, Arkansas River Basin, Okla.. 24. Heyburn Lake, Arkansas River Basin, Okla.. 25. Hugo Lake, Kiamichi River Basin, Okla.. 26. Hulah Lake, Verdigris River Basin, Okla... 27. Joe Creek, Tulsa, Okla.. ... 28. John Redmond Dam and Reservoir, Grand (Neosho) River Basin, Kans.... . 29. Kaw Lake, Arkansas River Basin, Okla.. 30. Lake Kemp, Wichita River Basin, Tex.. 31. Lukfata Lake, Little River Basin, Okla... 32. Marion, Kans.. 33. Marion Lake, Grand (Neosho) River Basin, Kans.... 34. Oologah Lake, Verdigris River Basin, Okla..... . . 35. Optima Lake, North Canadian River Basin, Okla.. 36. Pat Mayse Lake, Red River Basin, Tex.... 37. Pearson - Skubitz Big Hill Lake, Verdigris River Basin, Kans... 38. Pine Creek Lake, Little River Basin, Tex... . .. ... .. . 39. Red River Below Denison Dam (Tulsa District).. 40. Shidler Lake, Arkansas River Basin, Okla.. .. ... . 41. Skiatook Lake, Verdigris River Basin, Okla.. .. .. .. . 42. Toronto Lake, Verdigris River Basin, Kans.... 43. Towanda Lake, Walnut River Basin, Kans........ 44. Waurika Lake, Red River Basin, Okla.. ....... . 45. Wister Lake, Poteau River Basin, Okla. ....... ...... 46. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects.. .. 47. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations .. 47 A. Altus Reservoir, Red River Basin, Okla. . Page Flood Control (cont) 47 B. Arbuckle Reservoir, Red River .19-7 Basin, Okla.. 47 C. Cheney Reservoir, Ninnescah 19-7 River Basin, Kans.. 47 D. Fort Cobb Reservoir, Washita 19-8 River Basin, Okla.. 47 E. Foss Reservoir, Washita River .19-8 Basin, Okla..... .19-8 47 F. Mountain Park (Tom Steed Lake), Red River Basin, Okla.. 19-8 47 G. Norman Lake (Lake Thunderbird), Little River Basin, .19-8 Okla. .... . . 47 H. Sanford Reservoir (Lake .19-8 Meredith), Canadian River Basin, Okla.. 19-8 48. Other Authorized Flood Control 19-9 Projects.. 49. Flood Control Work under 19-9 Special Authorization. 19-9 . 19-9 �.. 19-9 19-9 19-10 19-10 ... 19-10 . 19-10 19-10 .19-10 . ... .. 19-11 . .19-11 ... ... ... 19-11 19-11 19-11 Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 50. Broken Bow Lake, Little River Basin, Okla.. 51. Denison Dam-Lake Texoma, Red River Basin, Tex. and Okla... 52. Eufaula Lake, Canadian River Basin, Okla. . 53. Fort Gibson Lake, Grand (Neosho) River Basin, Okla.. 54. Keystone Lake, Arkansas River Basin, Okla.. 55. Markham Ferry Reservoir, Grand (Neosho) River Basin, Okla. .. . . 56. Pensacola Lake, Grand (Neosho) River Basin, Okla.. 57. Robert S. Kerr Lock and Dam and Reservoir, Arkansas River Basin, Okla..... ... 58. Tenkiller Ferry Lake, Illinois River Basin, Okla.... 59. Webbers Falls Lock and Dam, Arkansas River Basin, Okla.. . . General Investigations 60. Surveys .19-11 61. Collection and Study of Basic Data. 19-2 Page 19-11 19-11 19-11 19-11 . 19-12 19-12 19-12 . 19-12 .19-12 19-12 .19-12 .19-13 19-13 19-13 19-13 .19-13 19-13 .19-14 19-14 19-14 .19-14 '.. . TULSA, OKLA., DISTRICT Navigation 1. BIG AND LITTLE SALLISAW CREEKS, OKLA. Location. About 3 miles southwest of Sallisaw, Sequoyah County, Okla., approximately 10 miles from the existing navigation sailing line upstream on Big Sallisaw Creek and Little Sallisaw Creek (about navigation mile 341.6). Existing project. Plan of improvement consists of a 9-foot-deep, 100-foot-wide navigation channel extending from near Sallisaw, Okla., to the existing McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System and of a 400- by 500-foot turning basin. (See table 19-B for authorizing legislation.) Estimated Federal cost is $3,800,000. Local cooperation. See section 2 of this report. Operations and results during fiscal year. Not applicable. Condition at end of fiscal year. Preconstruction Phase I General Design Memorandum at OCE for approval. 2. ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN, ARK., OKLA., AND KANS. Location. Arkansas River rises in Rocky Mountains near Leadville, Colo., and flows southeastward 1,396 miles through Colorado, Kansas, Oklahoma, and Arkansas to join Mississippi River 599 miles above Head of Passes, La. (See Geological Survey state maps, scale 1:500,000, and flood control and navigation maps of Mississippi River, Cairo, Ill., to Gulf of Mexico, 1970 edition, scale 1:62,500.) Existing project. Provides for improvement of Arkansas River Basin by construction of coordinated developments for navigation, hydroelectric power, flood control, water supply, water quality control, sediment control, recreation, and fish and wildlife propagation. McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System provides a channel 9 feet deep and 445.2 miles long beginning at mouth of White River, which enters Mississippi River 599.0 miles above Head of Passes, La.; thence 9.8 miles upstream to mouth of Wild Goose Bayou; thence 9.2 miles by a land cut, designated as Arkansas Post Canal to mile 42.0 (1943 survey) on Arkansas River; thence 376.0 miles along channel of latter stream to mouth of Verdigris River at navigation mile 395.0; thence 50.3 miles up Verdigris River to head of navigation at Catoosa, Okla. Waterway is canalized throughout its length by 17 locks and dams with total lift of 420 feet. Dardanelle, Ozark-Jeta Taylor, Robert S. Kerr, and Webbers Falls are multiple-purpose projects including power. Lock chambers are 110 by 600 feet. A minimum channel width of 150 feet is provided for Verdigris River, 225 feet for Sans Bois, 250 feet for Arkansas River, and 300 feet for Arkansas Post Canal and White River. Other coordinated developments consist of 15 lakes, of which 13 are in Tulsa District, Kansas and Oklahoma, and two in Little Rock District, Arkansas. The authorized features of the multiple-purpose plan within the Tulsa District are listed in table 19-C. Federal costs for combined comprehensive and multiple-purpose plan total $1,317,607,935. Local cooperation. For the navigation system, local interest must provide adequate terminal and transfer facilities and bear increased cost of maintenance and operation of all altered rail and highway routes, including bridges and appurtenances, utilities, and other existing improvements, other than federally owned. For lakes see requirements for each individual lake. Terminal facilities. Public port facilities were in operation at Pine Bluff, Little Rock, Dardanelle and Fort Smith, Ark., and Muskogee and Catoosa (Tulsa), Okla. Port authorities have been organized to develop public facilities at North Little Rock, Dardanelle-Russellville, Clarksville, Van Buren, Ark., and Sallisaw, Okla. Private commercial port facilities are complete and in operation at seven locations in Arkansas and at eight locations in Oklahoma. Ten additional private port facilities are being developed along improved waterways in the State of Arkansas. Operations and results during fiscal year. Blue Mountain, Canton, Dardanelle Lock and Dam (No. 10), Dardanelle Marine Terminal, David D. Terry Lock and Dam (No. 6), Elk City, Eufaula, Fall River, Fort Gibson, Keystone, W. D. Mayo Lock and Dam (No. 14), Chouteau Lock and Dam (No. 17), Newt Graham Lock and Dam (No. 18), Robert S. Kerr Lock and Dam and Reservoir (No. 15), Webbers Falls Lock and DAm (No. 16), and Oologah; Locks and Dams Nos. 2, 3, 4, 5, 9, and 13, Markham Ferry, Murray Lock and Dam (No.7), Nimrod, Norrell Lock and Dam (No. 1), Ozark-Jeta Taylor Lock and Dam (No.12), Pensacola, Pine Bluff Marine Terminal, Robert S. Kerr Marine Terminal, Tenkiller Ferry, Toad Suck Ferry Lock and Dam (No. 8), Toronto, and Wister were in operation. For details of McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System and lakes in Oklahoma and Kansas are shown on following pages. Condition at end of fiscal year. Status of individual items are reported separately in this chapter. 3. BANK STABILIZATION AND CHANNEL RECTIFICATION, ARKANSAS RIVER, ARK. AND OKLA. Location. On Arkansas River between Robert S. Kerr Damsite and Fort Smith, Ark., river miles 336.2 and 308.0, respectively. (See Geological Survey maps for Sans Bois, Okla., Sallisaw, Okla., and Fort Smith, Ark.-Okla., quadrangles, scale 1:125,000.) Existing project. Bank stabilization and channel rectification is a part of the McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1970. Federal cost was $12,700,038 for existing project located in Tulsa District. Local cooperation. See section 2 of this report. Operations and results during fiscal year. None. Operation and maintenance of project structures is reported and under appropriate navigation locks and dams. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in May 1952 and completed December 1969. 5. LOW HEAD LOCKS AND DAMS, OKLA. There are three lock and dam units on the Arkansas and Verdigris Rivers in addition to Robert S. Kerr and Webbers Falls. With some channel cutoffs and enlargement work they provide a navigable channel 9 feet deep from Fort Smith, Ark., to vicinity of Catoosa, Okla., where a turning basin is provided. Total Federal cost, including turning basin and channel cutoffs and enlargement is $115,485,466. (See table 19-B for authorizing legislation.) 5 A .LOCK AND DAM NO. 13 (POOL) CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN, OKLA. Location. Fort Smith, Ark., to W. D. Mayo Lock and Dam. Existing project. Consists of channel cutoffs and enlargement work to provide a navigable channel 9 feet deep with a minimum width of 250 feet from Fort Smith, Ark., to W. D. Mayo Lock and Dam. Local cooperation. None. Terminal facilities. None. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing projeact located in Tulsa District is complete. 5 B. W. D. MAYO LOCK AND DAM, ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN, OKLA. Location. Arkansas River at navigation mile 319.6, about 9 miles southwest of Fort Smith, Ark. Existing project. For description of completed improvement, see Annual Report for 1972. Project is a unit of the McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System. 19-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 Local cooperation. See section 2 of this report. Terminal facilities. None. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in May 1966 and the project placed in useful operation in October 1970. Lock and dam became operational for navigation December 1970. 5C. CHOUTEAU LOCK AND DAM, VERDIGRIS RIVER BASIN, OKLA. Location. Verdigris River at McClellan-Kerr navigation mile 401.5, about 7 miles north of Muskogee in Wagoner County, Okla. Existing project. For description of completed improvement, see Annual Report for 1972. Project is a unit of the McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System. Local cooperation. See section 2 of this report. Terminal facilities. A barge fleeting area and a grain loading facility are adequate for present traffic. Operations and results during fiscal year. Recreation facilities and beautification completed. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in July 1966 and the project placed in useful operation in November 1970. Lock and dam became operational for navigation in December 1970. 5D. NEWT GRAHAM LOCK AND DAM, VERDIGRIS RIVER BASIN, OKLA. Location. Verdigris River at McClellan-Kerr navigation mile 421.6, about 8 miles southwest of Inola in Wagoner County, Okla. Existing project. For description of completed improvement, see Annual Report for 1972. Project is a unit of the McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System. Local cooperation. See section 2 of this report. Terminal facilities. The Port of Catoosa offers storage and loading facilities consisting of cargo wharf, warehouse, terminal building, liquid loading facility, and fertilizer (dry bulk) facility. Two private facilities are in operation and a third is under construction. Facilities are considered adequate for present commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in October 1966 and the project placed in useful operation in September 1970. Lock and dam became operational for navigation in December 1970. 6. MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR FLEET AND MARINE TERMINALS, OKLA. Includes two terminals in the Little Rock District, and one terminal in the Tulsa District located near Sallisaw, Okla. (See table 19-B for authorizing legislation.) Information on this project follows: ROBERT S. KERR MARINE TERMINAL, OKLA. Location. Five miles south of Sallisaw, Okla., on the left side of Robert S. Kerr Lock and Dam and Reservoir. Existing project. Consists of wharf, office and storage building, storage space, and operating areas for servicing of floating plant and storage of machinery, equipment, and supplies to maintain the navigation facilities. Federal cost was $2,760,000 excluding cost of facilities to be provided for the US Coast Guard on a reimbursable basis. Local cooperation. See section 2 of this report. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in May 1967 and the terminal became operational in October 1970. 7. RED RIVER WATERWAY, LA, AR, OK, AND TX, INDEX AR TO DENISON DAM (Tulsa District) Location. On Red River in Arkansas, Oklahoma, and Texas, between Index, AR, and Denison Dam. (See Geological Survey State maps and folio maps of Red River -1958 edition.) Existing Project. Plan of improvement provides for channel realignment and river bank stabilization by dredging, cutoffs, and training works, including revetments, dikes, and steel jetties. The overall length of the Red River channel in this reach would be reduced from about 250 river miles to 200 miles. In addition, the authorized project provides for public use recreational development at various river cutoffs formed by the realigned channel. Estimated Federal cost is $183,000,000. (See table 19-B for authorized legislation.) Local Cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936 applies. In addition, non-Federal interests are required to make a cash contribution for one-half of the cost of recreation development, and 26.1 percent of the total construction cost for bank stabilization and channel works. The total estimated non-Federal cost is $77,000,000. Operations and results during fiscal year. Not applicable. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Preconstruction planning studies were initiated in December 1980. Analysis of potential for extending navigation to Denison Dam proved to be not economically feasible at this time and no further navigation studies are planned. No funds are available for fiscal year 1982. Preconstruction planning studies will resume when funds are appropriated. 8. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS Red River from Fulton, Ark., to mouth of Washita River. For description of completed improvement and authorization see Annual Report for 1924. Cost for construction was $378,574 and operation and maintenance $182,157. Curtailment of project was recommended in H. Doc. 947, 64th Cong., 1st seas. 9. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645. Poteau River, Arkansas and Oklahoma. Location. The Poteau River Small Navigation Project is located at Fort Smith, Arkansas. Existing project. The project provides for a 130-foot wide, 9-foot deep channel on the Poteau River extending from its confluence with the Arkansas River 1.7 miles upstream to the Port of Fort Smith. A turning basin is provided a short distance upstream of the port. (See table 19-B for authorizing legislation.) Cost for project was: $536,952 Federal and $25,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Section 107, River and Harbor Act of 1960 applies. Terminal facilities. Terminal facilities are owned by the Fort Smith Port Authority. Operations and results during fiscal year. Contract was completed in October, 1979 in the amount of $434,740. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project completed and placed in operation in November 1979. Flood Control 10. ARCADIA LAKE, DEEP FORK RIVER BASIN, OKLA. Location. On Deep Fork River, mile 213.8 in the metropolitan area of Oklahoma City and Edmond, Okla., about 1.5 miles west of Arcadia, in Oklahoma County, Okla. (See Geological Survey map for Arcadia, Okla., quadrangle, scale 1:24,000.) 19-4 TULSA, OKLA., DISTRICT Existing project. Plan of improvement provides for flood control, water supply, and recreation by construction of an earthfill dam approximately 104 feet high and 5,250 feet long with a high-level uncontrolled spillway. Outlet works will consist of gate tower and conduit. The lake will have a total capacity of 92,000 acre-feet (27,380 for conservation and 64,430 for flood control, and 190 for sedimentation reserve), and control a drainage area of 105 square miles. Estimated cost is $82,400,000. (See table 19-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, Water Supply Act of 1958, Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965, and Section 221, Flood Control Act of 1970 apply. Operations and results during fiscal year. Major accomplishments with regular funds: land acquisition and damages $5,391,000; outlet works $3,154,000; relocations $82,500. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in October 1980. The project is 18 percent complete. 11. ARK-RED RIVER BASINS CHLORIDE CONTROL Location. On certain tributary streams of Arkansas and Red Rivers in western half of Tulsa District. Existing Project. Provides for construction of project features to control the natural water pollution caused by the fifteen natural salt sources identified in 1957 by the US Public Health Service. The Arkansas and Red Rivers represent a major national and regional water resource which is severely limited because of poor water quality primarily caused by a natural pollutant, sodium chloride. The Arkansas River is polluted by five naturally occurring salt sources located in northwestern Oklahoma and southwestern Kansas. Those areas contribute an estimated 7,900 tons per day of dissolved salt to the river. The Red River is polluted by ten naturally occurring salt sources located in northwestern Texas and Southwestern Oklahoma. Those sources contribute an estimated 3,600 tons per day of dissolved salt to the river. Preauthorization studies were completed in 1966 and recommended construction of project features at thirteen of the fifteen sites. Area V, one of the areas in Texas was constructed as an experimental project. It has been operational since 1964 and controls approximately 80 percent of the basin flow. Construction was authorized on the remaining twelve sites in two parts. Construction of the project for three salt areas in the Wichita River Basin (Part I) was authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1970 (PL 91-611). During the early stages of the AE&D work performed after authorization, an administrative decision was made to separate further project development work on Part II by basin. Project features on Part I, Wichita River Basin, Part II, remaining Red River Basin and Part II, Arkansas River Basin are reported respectively under 11A, 11B, and 11C. Local Cooperation. Prior to construction of chloride control projects, assurances satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army will be furnished by responsible non-Federal interests to provide that these interests will continue and strengthen efforts to reduce manmade salt pollution, hold and save the United States free from damages due to water rights claims and to construction and operation of the project works, and participate in the cost of recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement as a part of the Arkansas Basin project in accordance with the Federal Water Project Recreation Act. Both the states of Oklahoma and Texas have provided necessary assurances and have made significant progress toward reducing manmade pollution. l1C. ARK-RED RIVER BASINS CHLORIDE CONTROL, PART II - ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN, OKLA. Location. Four salt areas on tributaries of the Arkansas River in Oklahoma: Area I, Great Salt Plains, located on the Salt Fork of the Arksansas River in Alfalfa County, Oklahoma; Area II-III, Big and Little Salt Plains, located on the main stem of the Cimarron River and its tributary, Buffalo Creek, in Woods, Woodward, and Harper Counties, Oklahoma; and Area IV located on Salt Creek a tributary of the Cimarron River in Blaine County, Oklahoma. Existing Project. The selected chloride control plan consists of the freshwater diversion concept for Area I, with division of the existing Great Salt Plains Lake into a brine lake and a freshwater lake. The freshwater diversion concept uses a series of dams, dikes, and channels to divert the freshwater around the brine source. The freshwater diversion concept is also selected for Area II-III, with a multipurpose component, Englewood Lake. The selected plan for Area IV is based on the collect and dispose concept. Brine is collected behind an inflatable dam and pumped to a brine lake for storage. Estimated Federal cost is $613,400,000. Local Cooperation. See Section 11 of this report. Operation and results during fiscal year end. None. Condition at end of fiscal year. The final of the Phase I GDM No. 32 for Areas I, II-III and IV was submitted in September 1981. In GDM No. 32, it is recommended that further studies for the Arkansas River Basin portion of the Arkansas-Red River Basin Chloride Control Project be deferred until a significant change occurs in present or projected conditions that would clearly demonstrate a greater need and probable use of the improved water. 12. BIG PINE LAKE, RED RIVER BASIN, TEX. Location. On Big Pine Creek (mile 16.5) approximately 25 miles northwest of Clarksville, Red River County, Tex. (See Geological Survey maps for Woodland, Manchester, and Kiomatia, Tex., quadrangles, scale 1:62,500 and Defense Mapping Agency map, Texarkana, Tex., scale 1:25,000.) Existing project. Plan of improvement provides for an earthfill dam 10,190 feet long, including an uncontrolled concrete chute spillway. Dam will rise to a height of 80.0 feet above streambed. Outlet works will consist of a 6-foot-diameter inlet conduit and.a stilling basin. A 30-inch water supply pipe and a 24-inch low-flow pipe will be constructed through the dam. The lake will have a total capacity of 174,400 acre-feet, of which 73,400 acre-feet will be allocated for flood control and 101,000 acre-feet for conservation and sedimentation reserve. Channel downstream will be improved by clearing and snagging to increase its capacity. The lake will control a drainage area of 95 square miles. Estimated cost is $52,100,000. (See table 19-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, and Section 221, Flood Control Act of 1970 apply. Operations and results during fiscal year. None. Condition at end of fiscal year. Phase II of the General Design Memo is complete. 13. BIRCH LAKE, VERDIGRIS RIVER BASIN, OKLA. Location. On Birch Creek, river mile 0.8, about 1.5 miles south of Barnsdall in Osage County, Okla. (See Geological Survey map for Barnsdall, Okla., quadrangle, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1979. Federal cost is $13,548,848. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, and Section 221, Flood Control Act of 1970 apply. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. No noteworthy rise occurred above the lake. Operation of the lake prevented flooding on 1,600 acres of land. Estimated monetary benefits attributed to Birch Lake operations for the prevention of flood damages total $367,000 to September 30, 1981. (See table 19-F for pool elevations and storages during fiscal year.) 19-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in November 1973. Project placed in useful operation in March 1977. 14. CANDY LAKE, VERDIGRIS RIVER BASIN, OKLA. Location. On Candy Creek, river mile 1.9, a tributary of Bird Creek in Verdigris River Basin. Damsite is about 1 mile northeast of Avant, Osage County, Okla. (See Geological Survey map for Avant, Okla., quadrangle, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. Plan of improvement provides for an earthfill dam about 4,200 feet long, including an uncontrolled concrete spillway, with a maximum height of 102 feet above streambed. Outlet works will consist of a gated intake structure, a 10- by 11.25-foot conduit, and a stilling basin. An 18-inch by 24-inch low-flow pipe and an 18-inch water supply pipe will be provided. The lake will have a total capacity of 75,420 acrefeet (44,160 for conservation and sediment reserve and 31,260 for flood control). Drainage area above the damsite is 43 square miles. Candy Lake will be operated as a unit of a seven-lake system for flood control in the Verdigris River Basin in Oklahoma. Estimated cost of project is $34,700,000. (See table 19-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, Water Supply Act of 1958, and Section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 apply. Operations and results during fiscal year. None. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction started in September 1976. The project is about 15 percent complete. Construction has been delayed because of the US Justice Department decision to withdraw condemnation proceedings to acquire mineral rights. 15. CANTON LAKE, ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN, OKLA. Location. On North Canadian River, about 394 miles above its mouth and about 2 miles north of Canton, Blaine County, Okla. (See sectional aeronautical chart, Wichita sheet, scale 1:500,000.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see page 590 of Annual Report for 1969. Federal cost is $10,912,323, of which $533,682 is Code 710 funds. Local cooperation. Completed as required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. No noteworthy rises occurred above the lake. Estimated monetary benefits attributed to Canton Lake operations for prevention of flood damages total $6,047,000 to September 30, 1981. Hydraulic studies were completed under the Dam Modernization Program to determine feasibility of modification of the project as a result of the Dam Safety Inspection Program. Final recommendations are being held in abeyance until other projects in the District and nationwide are analyzed for priorities. A total of 54,763 acre-feet was released for water supply. (See table 19-F for pool elevations and storages during fiscal year.) Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in December 1940 and project placed in useful operation in April 1948. 16. CLAYTON LAKE, LITTLE RIVER BASIN, OKLA. Location. On Jackfork Creek, river mile 2.8, a tributary of Kiamichi River, about 2.5 miles north of Clayton, Pushmataha County, Okla. (See Geological Survey map for Tuskahoma, Okla., quadrangle, scale 1:125,000 and Defense Mapping Agency map, McAlester, Okla., scale 1:250,000.) Existing project. Consists of a rolled earthfill dam about 14,138 feet long, with a maximum height of 101 feet above the streambed. An uncontrolled spillway 215 feet wide is constructed near the right abutment. Outlet works consisting of an oblong conduit, 9 by 12.25 feet, and a 2.5- by 5.25-foot pipe was installed for low-flow regulation. The lake will provide 128,200 acre-feet of storage for flood control and 302,400 acre-feet for conservation and sediment reserve, a total of 430,600 acrefeet, and controls a drainage area of 275 square miles. Clayton Lake will be operated as a unit of a three-lake system for flood control in the Kiamichi River Basin, including Hugo and Tuskahoma Lakes thereby reducing Red River floodflows. Estimated cost of project is $54,500,000. (See table 19-B-Red River below Denison Dam (Tulsa District)-for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, and Section 221, Flood Control Act of 1970 apply. Operations and results during fiscal year. Major accomplishments with regular funds: land acquisition and damages $298,000; embankment and outlet works $1,850,000; relocations $2,800,000; clearing $80,000; and cemeteries $335,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in August 1975 and the project is 83 percent complete. 17. COPAN LAKE, VERDIGRIS RIVER BASIN, OKLA. Location. On Little Caney River, river mile 7.4, a tributary of Caney River in Verdigris River watershed, about 2 miles west of Copan, Washington County, Okla. (See Geological Survey maps of Nowata, Okla., and Sedan and Independence, Kans., quadrangles, scale 1:125,000 and Defense Mapping Agency maps, Tulsa, Okla., Wichita, Kans., and Joplin, Mo., scale 1:250,000.) Existing project. The earthfill dam is 7,730 feet long, including a gated spillway section; a levee 17,000 feet long, for protection of Caney, Kans. Maximum height of dam above streambed is 73 feet. A concrete spillway, controlled by four 50- by 35.5-foot tainter gates, provides for operation of lake for flood control. Outlet works include a 36-inch low-flow pipe and a 12-inch future water supply pipe. The lake will have a total capacity of 227,700 acre-feet (43,400 for conservation and sediment reserve, and 184,300 for flood control). Drainage area above damsite is 505 square miles. Copan Lake will be operated as a unit of a seven-lake system for flood control in Verdigris River Basin in Oklahoma. Relocated Oklahoma State Highway 10 crosses the top of the dam. Estimated cost is $72,000,000. (See table 19-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, Water Supply Act of 1958, and Section 221, Flood Control Act of 1970 apply. Operations and results during fiscal year. Major accomplishments with regular funds: road relocations $1,348,000; 2nd stage embankment $685,000; utility relocations $110,000; railroad relocations $4,354,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in November 1972. The project is 90 percent complete. 18. COUNCIL GROVE LAKE, GRAND (NEOSHO) RIVER BASIN, KANS. Location. On Grand (Neosho) River about 450 miles above mouth and about 1.5 miles northwest of Council Grove, Morris County, Kans. (See Geological Survey maps for Parkerville and Eskridge, Kans., quadrangles, scale 1:125,000.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see page 519 of Annual Report for 1969. Federal cost is $11,604,732, of which $163,829 is Code 710 funds. Local cooperation. Completed as required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. No noteworthy rises occurred on Grand (Neosho) River above the lake. Estimated monetary benefits attributed to Council Grove Lake operations for prevention of flood damages total $7,519,000 to September 30, 1981. (See table 19-F for pool elevations and storages during fiscal year.) Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in July 1960 and project placed in useful operation in October 1964. 19-6 TULSA, OKLA., DISTRICT 19. EL DORADO LAKE, WALNUT RIVER BASIN, KANS. Location. On Walnut River, river mile 100.2, a tributary of Arkansas River, about 2 miles northeast of El Dorado, Butler County, Kans. (See Geological Survey maps for El Dorado and DeGraff, Kans., quadrangles, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. The earthfill dam is 21,000 feet long, including a 350 foot uncontrolled spillway. Dam is 99 feet above streambed. The lake will control 234 square miles of drainage area and provide a total storage of 236,200 acre-feet (79,200 for flood control storage, 154,100 for conservation, and 2,900 for sedimentation reserve). Outlet works consist of an oblong conduit, 11.5- by 15.75-foot, 24-inch by 36-inch low-flow sluice and a 36-inch water supply pipe. El Dorado Lake will be operated as a unit of a three-lake system for flood control in the Walnut River Basin. Estimated Federal cost of project is $90,100,000. Estimated non-Federal cost is $5,600,000. (See table 19-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, Water Supply Act of 1958, Federal Water Recreation Act of 1965, and Section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 apply. Operations and results during fiscal year. Major accomplishments with regular funds: road relocations $695,000; railroad relocations $638,000; Stage II embankment $24,000; Stage III embankment $2,187,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in October 1973. The project is 90 percent complete. Remaining work consists of public-use facilities and boundary fencing. Impoundment began in June 1981. 20. ELK CITY LAKE, VERDIGRIS RIVER BASIN, KANS. Location. On Elk River, river mile 8.7, about 7 miles northwest of Independence, Montgomery County, Kans. (See Geological Survey maps for Caney-NE, NW, and SW, and Benton, Kans., quadrangles, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see page 593 of Annual Report for 1969. Federal cost is $19,042,990. Local cooperation. Completed as required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. No noteworthy rises occurred above the lake. Estimated monetary benefits attributed to Elk City Lake for prevention of flood damages total $36,241,000 to September 30, 1981. (See table 19-F for pool elevations and storages during fiscal year.) Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in February 1962 and project placed in useful operation in March 1966. 21. FALL RIVER LAKE, VERDIGRIS RIVER BASIN, KANS. Location. On Fall River about 54 miles above its confluence with Verdigris River and about 4 miles northwest of Fall River, Greenwood County, Kans. (See Geological Survey map for Eureka, Kans., quadrangle, scale 1:125,000; and Severy, Kans., quadrangle, scale 1:62,500.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see page 953 of Annual Report for 1969. Federal cost is $10,512,382, of which $13,000 is Code 710 funds. Local cooperation. Completed as required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. No noteworthy rises occurred above the lake. Estimated monetary benefits attributed to Fall River Lake operations for prevention of flood damages total $26,523,000 to September 30, 1981. (See table 19-F for pool elevations and storages during fiscal year.) Hydraulic studies were completed under the Dam Modernization Program to determine feasibility of modification of the project as a result of the Dam Safety Inspection Program. Final recommendations are being held in abeyance until other projects in the District and nationwide are analyzed for priorities. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of dam began in May 1946 and project placed in full operation in April 1949. 22. FORT SUPPLY LAKE, NORTH CANADIAN RIVER BASIN, OKLA. Location. On Wolf Creek, river mile 5.5, a tributary of North Canadian River, about 12 miles northwest of Woodward, Woodward County, Okla. (See sectional aeronautical chart, Wichita sheet, scale 1:500,000.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see page 594 of Annual Report for 1969. Federal cost is $7,723,127, of which $132,941 is Code 710 funds. Local cooperation. Completed as required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. A total of 246 acre-feet was withdrawn for water supply. No noteworthy rises occurred above the lake.Estimated monetary benefits attributed to Fort Supply Lake operations for prevention of flood damages total $3,055,000 to September 30, 1981. (See table 19-F for pool elevations and storages during fiscal year.) Hydraulic studies were completed under the Dam Modernization Program to determine feasibility of modification of the project as a result of the Dam Safety Inspection Program. Final recommendations are being held in abeyance until other projects in the District and nationwide are analyzed for priorities. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in October 1938 and the project was placed in full flood control operation in May 1942. 23. GREAT SALT PLAINS LAKE, ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN, OKLA. Location. On Salt Fork of Arkansas River, mile 103.3, about 12 miles east of Cherokee, Alfalfa County, Okla. (See sectional aeronautical chart, Wichita sheet, scale 1:500,000.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see page 594 of Annual Report for 1969. Federal cost was $4,626,270. Local cooperation. Completed as required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. No noteworthy rises occurred above the lake. Estimated monetary benefits attributed to Great Salt Plains Lake operations for prevention of flood damages total $13,239,000 to September 30, 1981. (See table 19-F for pool elevations and storages during fiscal year.) Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of dam was initiated September 1938 and completed July 1941. Project placed in full flood control operation in May 1941. 24. HEYBURN LAKE, ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN, OKLA. Location. On Polecat Creek, a minor tributary to Arkansas River near Sapulpa, Creek County, Okla. (See Geological Survey maps for Nuyaka, Hominy, and Claremore, Okla., quadrangles, scale 1:250,000; and Bristow and Kiefer, Okla., quadrangles, scale 1:62,500.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see page 599 of Annual Report for 1969. Federal cost is $2,518,673 (including $135,300 for construction of channel improvement on Polecat and Rock Creeks and $151,500 Code 710 funds). Local cooperation. Completed as required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued and repaired embankment slope protection. Rural Water District No. 1, Creek County, Okla., used 1652 acre-feet of water from the lake. No noteworthy rises occurred above the lake. Estimated monetary benefits attributed to lake operations for prevention of flood 19-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 damages total $3,259,000 to September 30, 1981. (See table 19-F for pool elevations and storages during fiscal year.) Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was started March 1948 and the project was placed in useful operation in September 1950. Channel improvements below lake were completed in September 1952. 25. HUGO LAKE, KIAMICHI RIVER BASIN, OKLA. Location. On Kiamichi River, river mile 17.6, about 7 miles east of Hugo, Choctaw County, Okla. (See Geological Survey map for Alikchi, Okla., quadrangle, scale 1:125,000.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement see Annual Report for 1977. Federal cost is $37,659,102, of which $22,171 is Code 710 funds. (See Table 19-B-Red River below Denison Dam (Tulsa District)--for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, and Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, apply. State of Oklahoma through its Water Resources Board and local interests furnished resolutions of intent to repay costs allocated to water supply storage. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. A total of 4,886 acre-feet of water was withdrawn from the lake for water supply. One noteworthy rise occurred on the Kiamichi River above the lake. The project reduced the damaging effects of floods on 500 acres of land below the damsite. Flood damages prevented total $3,510,000 to September 30, 1981. (See table 19-F for pool elevations and storages during fiscal year.) Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in October 1967 and the project was placed in useful operation in January 1974. 26. HULAH LAKE, VERDIGRIS RIVER BASIN, OKLA. Location. On Caney River, river mile 96.2, about 15 miles northwest of Bartlesville, near Hulah, Osage County, Okla. (See Geological Survey maps for Pawhuska, Okla., and Sedan, Kans., quadrangles, scale 1:125,000.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1969. Federal cost is $11,133,333, of which $264,727 is Code 710 funds. Local cooperation. Completed as required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. No noteworthy rises occurred above the lake. Estimated monetary benefits attributed to Hulah Lake operations for prevention of flood damages total $59,490,000 to September 30, 1981. A total of 10,824 acre-feet of water was withdrawn by city of Bartlesville, Okla. (See table 19-F for pool elevations and storages during fiscal year.) Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in May 1946 and completed in June 1950. Project placed in full flood control operation in September 1951. 27. JOE CREEK, TULSA, OKLA. Location. Joe Creek, a left bank tributary of the Arkansas River, Tulsa County, Okla. (See Geological Survey Map for Jenks, Okla., quadrangle, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. The project consists of 11,000 feet of improved channel along Joe Creek and stub entrance for Little Joe Creek and South Fork of Little Joe Creek. The upstream 8,950 feet of improved channel is concrete lined, and the remainder of the channel has stone side-slope protection. (See table 19-B for authorizing legislation.) Federal cost was $3,000,000 and the non-Federal cost was $6,500,000. Local cooperation. Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended, applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. City of Tulsa assumed project operation and maintenance responsibilities in January 1981. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in February, 1978. The project was completed in January 1981. 28. JOHN REDMOND DAM AND RESERVOIR, GRAND (NEOSHO) RIVER BASIN, KANS. Location. Dam is on Grand (Neosho) River, river mile 343.7, about 2 miles northwest of Burlington, Coffey County, Kans. (See Geological Survey maps for Burlington and Emporia, Kans., quadrangles, scale 1:125,000.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1970. Federal cost is $28,151,515, of which $170,651 is Code 710 funds. Local cooperation. Completed as required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Water supply usage totaled 26,629 acre-feet. No noteworthy rises occurred above the reservoir. Estimated monetary benefits attributed to reservoir operations for prevention of flood damages total $38,274,000 to September 30, 1981. (See table 19-F for pool elevations and storages during fiscal year.) Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was initiated in July 1959 and completed in December 1965. Project placed in flood control operation in July 1964. 29. KAW LAKE, ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN, OKLA. Location. On Arkansas River, river mile 653.7, about 8 miles east of Ponca City, Kay County, Okla. (See Geological Survey map for Charley Creek, Okla., quadrangle, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1977. Federal cost is $108,672,964. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, and Water Supply Act of 1958 apply. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. No noteworthy rises occurred above the structure. Estimated monetary benefits attributed to lake operations for prevention of flood damages total $5,746,000 to September 30, 1981. A total of 6,783 acre-feet of water was released for water supply. (See table 19-F for pool elevations and storages during fiscal year.) Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in June 1966 and project placed in operation in May 1976. 30. LAKE KEMP, WICHITA RIVER BASIN, TEX. Location. On Wichita River, river mile 126.7, about 40 miles southwest of Wichita Falls, Tex. (See aeronautical chart, Dallas, Tex., scale 1:500,000 and Defense Mapping Agency map, Wichita Falls, Tex., scale 1:250,000.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1977. Cost of completed project was $7,637,702 Federal and $3,130,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Completed as required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. A total of 36,278 acre-feet of water was released for water supply. One noteworthy rise occurred above the lake. Estimated monetary benefits attributed to reservoir operations for prevention of flood damages total $2,850,000 to September 30, 1981. (See table 19-F for pool elevations and storages during fiscal year.) Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in April 1970 and the project placed in useful operation in October 1972. 31. LUKFATA LAKE, LITTLE RIVER BASIN, OKLA. AND ARK. Location. On Glover Creek at mile 24.5 about 11.5 miles north of Glover, McCurtain County, Okla. (See Geological Survey map for Lukfata, Okla., quadrangle, scale 1:125,000; and Bethel, Smithville, Golden, and Broken Bow, Okla., quadrangles, scale 1:62,500.) 19-8 TULSA, OKLA., DISTRICT Existing project. Plan provides for construction of a rockfill dam about 2,600 feet long, rising 176 feet above the original streambed. An uncontrolled 600-foot saddle spillway will be near the left end of the embankment. Outlet works will provide for a 12-foot conduit and a stilling basin. The lake will provide a total storage of 252,100 acre-feet (208,630 for flood control, 43,470 for conservation and sedimentation reserve), and will control a drainage area of 252 square miles. Lukfata Lake will be operated as a unit of a seven-lake system for flood control in Little River watershed, thereby reducing Red River floodflows. Estimated cost (1979 price levels) of project is $39,900,000. (See table 19-B-Red River below Denison Dam (Tulsa District)-for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, and Section 221, Flood Control Act of 1970 apply. Operations and results during fiscal year. None. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction has not started. 32. MARION, KANS. Location. On Mud Creek at Marion, the county seat of Marion County, Kans. Existing project. Construction of a diversion channel 9,026 feet in length, an overflow protection levee 17,875 feet in length, and structures to control interior drainage and low streamflow. Railroad and highway bridges were altered or relocated as required. Estimated Federal cost is $5,466,394 and $900,000 non-Federal cost. (See table 19-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; hold the United States free from damages; maintain and operate all works after completion; perform all relocations except railroads; acquire fee title to lands for borrow and ponding purposes and flowage easements over lands for ponding only; and prevent encroachment on existing and improved channel. Operations and results during fiscal year. City of Marion, Kansas assumed project operation and maintenance responsibility. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction started in June 1975 and was completed in April 1980. 33. MARION LAKE, GRAND (NEOSHO) RIVER BASIN, KANS. Location. On Cottonwood River, river mile 126.7, about 3 miles northwest of Marion, Marion County, Kans. (See Geological Survey map for Newton, Kans., quadrangle, scale 1:125,000.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1969. Federal cost of project is $13,335,317 of which $17,779 is Code 710 funds. Local cooperation. Completed as required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. No noteworthy rises occurred above the lake. Estimated monetary benefits attributed to Marion Lake operations for prevention of flood damages total $26,126,000 to September 30, 1981. (See table 19-F for pool elevations and storages during fiscal year.) Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in June 1964 and the project placed in flood control operation February 1968. 34. OOLOGAH LAKE, VERDIGRIS RIVER BASIN, OKLA. Location. On Verdigris River about 10 miles northwest of Claremore, Rogers County, Okla., and about 2 miles southeast of Oologah, Rogers County, Okla. (See Geological Survey maps for Claremore and Nowata, Okla., quadrangles, scale 1:125,000.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation, see Annual Report for 1972. Federal cost of project is $46,688,556 of which $13,994 is Code 710 funds. Local cooperation. Completed as required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. A total of 48,682 acre-feet of water was withdrawn from the lake for water supply. No noteworthy rises occurred above the lake. Estimated monetary benefits attributed to Oologah Lake operations for prevention of flood damages total $38,444,000 to September 30, 1981. (See table 19-F for pool elevations and storages during fiscal year.) Condition at end of fiscal year. After construction of right abutment access road, project was placed in standby status in October 1951. Construction was resumed in December 1955 and completed in May 1963 for initial development. Construction for ultimate development was initiated July 1967. The project for ultimate development is complete. 35. OPTIMA LAKE, NORTH CANADIAN RIVER BASIN, OKLA. Location. On North Canadian River, river mile 623.2, about 4.5 miles northeast of Hardesty, Texas County, Okla. (See Geological Survey map for Optima Dam, Okla., quadrangle, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For description of existing improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1979. Federal cost is $47,224,665. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance began. No noteworthy rises occurred above the lake. Estimated monetary benefits attributed to Optima Lake operations for prevention of flood damages total $7,000 to September 30, 1981. (See table 19-F for pool elevations and storages during fiscal year.) Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in March 1966. Impoundment was started in October, 1978. The project is complete. 36. PAT MAYSE LAKE, RED RIVER BASIN, TEX. Location. On Sanders Creek, mile 4.6, a tributary of Red River, about 12 miles north of Paris, Lamar County, Tex. (See Geological Survey map for Grant, Tex., quadrangle, scale 1:62,500 and Defense Mapping Agency map, Texarkana, Tex., scale 1:250,000.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1970. Federal cost of project is $9,310,661, of which $819,404 is Code 710 funds. Local cooperation. Completed as required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Two noteworthy rises occurred above the lake. Flooding was prevented on an average of 500 acres of land. Estimated monetary benefits attributed to Pat Mayse Lake operations for prevention of flood damages total $2,523,000 to September 30, 1981. A total of 11,433 acre-feet of water was released for water supply to city of Paris, Tex. (See table 19-F for pool elevations and storages during fiscal year.) Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in March 1965 and project was placed in full flood control operation in September 1967. 37. PEARSON - SKUBITZ BIG HILL LAKE, VERDIGRIS RIVER BASIN, KANS. Location. On Big Hill Creek, river mile 33.3, about 5 miles east of Cherryvale, Kans. (See Geological Survey maps for Mound Valley and Parsons, Kans., quadrangles, scale 1:62,500.) Existing project. Consists of an earthfill dam about 3,900 feet long, 83 feet above streambed. The 400-foot uncontrolled spillway is located in the right abutment. Outlet works include a drop inlet intake structure, a 5-foot 8-inch-diameter conduit, and a stilling basin. A 30-inch-diameter pipe is provided for water supply releases along with a 2- by 5-foot low flow opening. The lake has a total capacity of 40,600 acre-feet, (13,100 for flood control and 27,500 for conservation and sedimentation reserve), and 19-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 will control runoff from a drainage area of 37 square miles. The lake will be operated as a unit of a five-lake system for flood control in the Verdigris River Basin in Kansas, with a seven-lake system in Verdigris River Basin in Oklahoma. Estimated cost is $17,120,000. (See table 19-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, and Section 221, Flood Control Act of 1970 apply. Operations and results during fiscal year. All major items of construction are complete except recreation facilities, which are presently under contract. Major accomplishments with regular funds: Public-use areas $2,972,200. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in April 1974. Impoundment began March 1981. The project is 90 percent complete. 38. PINE CREEK LAKE, LITTLE RIVER BASIN, OKLA. Location. On Little River, river mile 145.3, about 5 miles northwest of Wright City, McCurtain County, Okla. (See Geological Survey maps for Alikchi, Okla., quadrangle, scale 1:125,000; and Wright City and Pickens, Okla., quadrangles NE, NW, SE, and SW, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1970. Federal cost of project is $20,304,909 of which $3,500 is Code 710 funds. Local cooperation. Completed as required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. A total of 33,649 acre-feet of water was released for water supply. Three noteworthy rises occurred above the lake. Flooding was prevented on an average of 2,500 acres of land. Estimated monetary benefits attributed to Pine Creek Lake operation for prevention of flood damages total $6,492,000 to September 30, 1981. (See table 19-F for pool elevations and storages during fiscal year.) Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in February 1963 and the project was placed in useful operation in June 1969. 39. RED RIVER BELOW DENISON DAM (TULSA DISTRICT) Location. On Red River and its tributaries below Denison Dam, in Oklahoma, Arkansas, Texas, and Louisiana. (See Geological Survey State maps and folio maps of Red River-1958 edition.) Existing project. Provides for construction of 11 flood control lakes in combination with existing or authorized Federal and non-Federal levee improvements, modified as required, and channel stabilization at locations where levee setbacks are impossible or uneconomical. (See table 19-G for water control projects included in general flood control plan for Red River below Denison Dam within Tulsa District.) (See table 19-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. See individual reports. 40. SHIDLER LAKE, ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN, OKLA. Location. On Salt Creek, mile 39.2, a tributary of Arkansas River, about 1 mile east of Shidler, Osage County, Okla. (See Geological Survey map for Fairfax, Okla., quadrangle, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. Provides for an earthfill dam 6,050 feet long, with a maximum height of 117 feet above streambed. An uncontrolled spillway 200 feet wide will be east of dam. Outlet works will include a gate tower with gated wet well inlet with a 10.5 by 11.5 foot controlled conduit. A 30-inch low-flow bypass and a 24-inch water supply line will be provided. A roadway will be located along crest of dam. The total lake capacity of 108,100 acre-feet will be allocated, 49,900 acre-feet for flood control and 58,200 acre-feet for conservation, and will control runoff from 99 square miles. Shidler Lake will be operated as a unit of the coordinated lake system for flood control in the Arkansas River Basin. Estimated cost of the project is $30,800,000. (See table 19-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, and Section 221, Flood Control Act of 1970 apply. Operations and results during fiscal year. None. Condition at end of fiscal year. Preconstruction planning completed. 41. SKIATOOK LAKE, VERDIGRIS RIVER BASIN, OKLA. Location. On Hominy Creek, mile 14.3, a tributary of Bird Creek, in Verdigris River Basin about 5 miles west of Skiatook, Osage County, Okla. (See Geological Survey map for Avant, Okla., quadrangle, SE, scale 1:24,000 and Defense Mapping Agency map, Enid, Okla., scale 1:250,000.) Existing project. Provides for an earthfill dam 3,590 feet long, 143 feet high with a crown width of 32 feet. The uncontrolled 100-foot spillway will be located in the right abutment. Outlet works will consist of a controlled intake structure, 10.5-foot diameter tunnel, stilling basin, 2.5-by 5-foot low-flow sluice, and a 36-inch water supply pipe. The lake will provide a total storage of 513,500 acre-feet (319,400 for conservation storage, 182,300 for flood control, and 11,800 for sedimentation reserve), and will control a drainage area of 354 square miles. Skiatook Lake will be operated as a unit of a seven-lake system for flood control in the Verdigris River Basin in Oklahoma. Estimated cost of project is $104,000,000. (See table 19-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, Water Supply Act of 1958, and Section 221, Flood Control Act of 1970 apply. Operations and results during fiscal year. Major accomplishments with regular funds: 2nd stage embankment, spillway, and outlet works $6,550,000; relocations $5,023,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in January 1974. The project is 58 percent complete. 42. TORONTO LAKE, VERDIGRIS RIVER BASIN, KANS. Location. On Verdigris River about 271.5 miles above its mouth and 4 miles south and east of Toronto, Woodson County, Kans. (See Geological Survey map for Fredonia, Kans., quadrangle, scale 1:125,000.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1969. Federal cost is $13,896,324 of which $922 is Code 710 funds. Local cooperation. Completed as required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. The city of Toronto, Kans., used 68 acre-feet of water from the lake. One noteworthy rise occurred above the lake. Flooding was prevented on 7,500 acres of land. Estimated monetary benefits attributed to operation of Toronto Lake for prevention of flood damages total $22,278,000 to September 30, 1981. (See table 19-F for pool elevations and storages during fiscal year.) Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began November 1954 and project placed in full operation March 1960. 43. TOWANDA LAKE, WHITEWATER RIVER, KANS. Location. On Whitewater River, mile 18.5, a tributary of Walnut River, about 0.75 mile northwest of Towanda, Kans., in Butler County, Kans. (See Geological Survey maps for Benton and El Dorado SW, Kans., quadrangles, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. Plan of improvement provides for an earthfill embankment and a gated concrete spillway. The dam would be 11,460 feet long and would have a maximum height of 82 feet above the streambed. The spillway would be 184 feet long and have four tainter 19-10 TULSA, OKLA., DISTRICT gates. Two 24-inch pipes in the spillway would provide for low flow and water supply. Total storage in the lake would be 208,000 acre-feet including 133,500 acre-feet for flood control, 46,500 acre-feet for water conservation, and 28,000 acre-feet for sediment. Towanda Lake would be operated as a unit of a three-lake system for flood control in the Walnut River Basin. The estimated cost (1980 price levels) of the project is $78,700,000. (See table 19-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, and Section 221, Flood Control Act of 1970 apply. Operations and results during fiscal year. None. Condition at end of fiscal year. Phase I studies are complete. A Stage 2 documentation was submitted to Southwestern Division in May 1979 that this study be discontinued because of the lack of economic feasibility and the project be placed in inactive status. The report was forwarded to the Chief of Engineers in February 1980. 44. WAURIKA LAKE, RED RIVER BASIN, OKLA. Location. Beaver Creek, mile 27.0, a tributary of Red River, about 6 miles northwest of Waurika, Jefferson County, Okla. (See Geological Survey map for Hastings, Okla.-Tex., quadrangle, scale 1:62,500.) Existing project. An earthfill dam 16,600 feet long, including an uncontrolled spillway 300 feet wide, and 106 feet above streambed. Outlet works include a gated conduit 13.5 feet in diameter, a 14-inch water supply pipe, and a 12-inch low-flow pipe. The lake provides a total storage of 343,500 acre-feet (199,700 for conservation storage, 140,400 for flood control, and 3,400 for sedimentation reserve), and controls a drainage area of 562 square miles. Waurika Lake is operated as a unit of a coordinated lake system for flood control in Red River Basin. Estimated cost is $67,080,000. (See table 19-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, and Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, apply. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operations and maintenance continued. A total of 2,750 acre-feet was withdrawn for water supply. Major accomplishments with regular funds: Land acquisition and damages $424,300; pipelines $332,800. No noteworthy rises occurred above the lake. Estimated monetary benefits attributed to Waurika Lake operations for prevention of flood damages total $1,984,000 to September 30, 1981. (See table 19-F for pool elevations and storages during fiscal year.) Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in July 1971. Impoundment began in August, 1977. Project is complete with the exception of boundary fencing. Project is 99 percent complete. 45. WISTER LAKE, POTEAU RIVER BASIN, OKLA. Location. On Poteau River, river mile 60.9, about 2 miles south of Wister, LeFlore County, Okla. (See Geological Survey map for Winding Stair, Okla., quadrangle, scale 1:125,000.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see page 601 of Annual Report for 1969. Federal cost was $10,501,226. Local cooperation. Completed as required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. One noteworthy rise occurred above the lake. Flooding was prevented on 18,000 acres of land. Estimated monetary benefits attributed to Wister Lake operations for prevention of flood damages total $50,174,000 to September 30, 1981. A total of 2,760 acrefeet of water was withdrawn from the lake for water supply. (See table 19-F for pool elevations and storages during fiscal year.) Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began April 1946 and was completed May 1949. Project placed in full flood control operation in October 1949. 46. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Semiannual inspection of completed local flood protection projects operated and maintained by local interests are made to determine extent of compliance with approved regulations for operation and maintenance. (See table 19-H for inspection of local flood control projects.) Fiscal year cost was $142,703. Total cost to September 30, 1981 was $771,571. 47. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS Flood Control Act of 1944 authorized the Secretary of War to prescribe regulations for use of storage allocated for flood control or navigation at all reservoirs constructed wholly or in part with Federal funds. Under the purview of this act, operation of the flood control storage included in reservoirs shown below in items 51A through 51H is prescribed by the Corps. Work accomplished consists of operating activities necessary in basin-wide coordination of functional scheduling of releases from reservoirs operated by other agencies and preparation of flood control operation and maintenance manuals for projects underway. Fiscal year cost from regular funds for maintenance was $221,015. 47A. ALTUS RESERVOIR Located on the North Fork of the Red River, 16 miles north of Altus, Oklahoma, the project was completed in 1948 by the Bureau of Reclamation (now Water and Power Resource Service), (See table 19-F for pool elevations and storages during fiscal year.) Flood damages prevented total $2,335,000 through September 30, 1981. 47B. ARBUCKLE RESERVOIR Located on Rock Creek, a Red River tributary 6 miles southwest of Sulphur, Oklahoma, the project was completed in 1967 by the Bureau of Reclamation (now Water and Power Resource Service), (See table 19-F for pool elevations and storages during fiscal year.) Flood damages prevented total $215,000 through September 30, 1981. 47C. CHENEY RESERVOIR Located on the Ninnescah River, about 23 miles west of Wichita, Kansas, the project was completed in 1965 by the Bureau of Reclamation (now Water and Power Resource Service). (See table 19-F for pool elevations and storages during fisca' year.) Flood damages prevented total $6,876,000 through September 30, 1981. 471). FORT COBB RESERVOIR Located on Cobb (Pond) Creek, a tributary of the Washita River, in Caddo County, Oklahoma, the project was completed in 1959 by the Bureau of Reclamation (now Water and Power Resource Service). (See table 19-F for pool elevations and storages during fiscal year.) Flood damages prevented total $246,000 through September 30, 1981. 47E. FOSS RESERVOIR Located on the Washita River, about 7 miles north of Foss, Oklahoma, the project was completed in 1961 by the Bureau of Reclamation (now Water and Power Resource Service). (See table 19-F for pool elevations and storages during fiscal year.) Flood damages prevented through September 30, 1981 total $621,000. 19-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 47F. MOUNTAIN PARK (TOM STEED LAKE) Located on Otter Creek, a tributary of the North Fork of the Red River, about 6 miles north of Snyder, Oklahoma, the project was completed in 1977 by the Bureau of Reclamation (now Water and Power Resource Service). (See table 19-F for pool elevations and storages during fiscal year.) Flood damages prevented through September 30, 1981 total $328,000. 47G. NORMAN LAKE (LAKE THUNDERBIRD) Located on the Little River, about 12 miles east of Norman, Oklahoma, the project was completed in 1965 by the Bureau of Reclamation (now Water and Power Resource Service). (See table 19-F for pool elevations and storages during fiscal year.) Flood damages prevented through September 30, 1981 total $2,256,000. 47H. SANFORD RESERVOIR (LAKE MEREDITH) Located on the Canadian River about 8 miles northwest of Borger, Texas, the project was completed in 1965 by the Bureau of Reclamation (now Water and Power Resource Service). (See table 19-F for pool elevations and storages during fiscal year.) Flood damages prevented through September 30, 1981 total $6,000. 48. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See table 19-I. 49. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Small flood control projects not specifically authorized by Congress (Section 205, 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended Public Law 858, 80th Cong.), (preauthorization). See table 19-J. Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation). Federal cost for fiscal year was $158,733, of which $88,464 was for advance preparation and $70,269 for repair and restoration. Snagging and clearing of navigable streams and tributaries in interest of flood control (Section 208, Flood Control Act of 1954, Public Law 780, 83rd Cong.). Federal cost for fiscal year was $2,591 as follows: Study Horse Cr., Ottawa County, Okla., $591; Willow Cr., Stephens County, Duncan, Okla., $2,000. Emergency bank protection (Section 14, Flood Control Act of 1946, Public Law 526, 79th Cong.). Federal cost for fiscal year was $120,425 as follows: Wildhorse Creek, Carter County, Kans., $28,702; Cottonwood River, Chase and Lyons Counties, Kans., $11; Double Creek, Washington County, Okla., $6; Neosho River, Crawford County, Kans., $4; Coon Creek, Dewey, Okla., $4,165; Red River, Clay County, Tex., $83; Red River, Little River County, Ark., $29; Road Protection, Washita River, Okla., $32,070; Rolling Fork River, Sevier County, Ark., $4,115; Salt Fork of Red River, Jackson County, Okla., $6,243; Verdigris River, Coffeyville, Kans., $5,093; and Walnut River, Cowley County, Kansas, $39,902. Flood insurance activities (Section 1301-1377, Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968, Public Law 90-448, as amended.) In coordination with flood control activities, 8 flood insurance studies were in progress in accordance with various Interagency Agreements at a fiscal year cost of $78,200 under Housing and Urban Development reimbursable orders. Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 50. BROKEN BOW LAKE, LITTLE RIVER BASIN, OKLA. Location. On Mountain Fork River, river mile 20.3, about 9 miles northeast of Broken Bow, McCurtain County, Okla. (See Geological Survey maps for Broken Bow and Smithville, Okla., quadrangles, scale 1:62,500.) Existing project. For description of completed improvements and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1971. Federal cost was $41,222,692. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, and Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, apply. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Three noteworthy rises occurred above the lake. Operation of the lake prevented downstream flooding on an average of 4,500 acres of land. Estimated monetary benefits attributed to Broken Bow Lake operations for prevention of flood damages total $8,084,000 to September 30, 1981. During low-flow water periods, releases totaling 4,344 acre-feet were made to supplement water for a State park. Other low flow requirements met by power releases. Delivered 132,314,800 kilowatt-hours of electric energy to Southwestern Power Administration for distribution and sale, and released 711,099 acre-feet of water through turbines. (See table 19-F for pool elevations and storages during fiscal year.) Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in November 1961 and project placed in useful operation in October 1968. Power units 1 and 2 were placed in operation in January and June 1970, respectively. 51. DENISON DAM-LAKE TEXOMA, RED RIVER BASIN, TEX. AND OKLA. Location. On Red River, river mile 725.9, about 5 miles northwest of Denison, Tex. (See Geological Survey maps for Denison, Tex., and Tishomingo, Okla., quadrangles, scale 1:125,000; and Denison Dam and Gordonville, Tex., quadrangles, scale 1:62,500.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1969. Hydroelectric development consists of two units having an installed capacity of 70,000 kilowatts. Ultimate installation planned is for five units with a total of 175,000 kilowatts. Lake Texoma is operated as a unit of a coordinated lake system for flood control in the Red River Basin. Federal cost is $67,864,473 of which $3,394,828 are Code 710 funds. Non-Federal cost was $1,256,068. Local cooperation. Completed as required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. No noteworthy rises occurred above the lake. Estimated monetary benefits attributed to Denison Dam-Lake Texoma operation for prevention of flood damages downstream to Fulton, Ark., total $40,611,000 to September 30, 1981. (See table 19-F for pool elevations and storages during fiscal year.) A total of 5,660 acre-feet was withdrawn for water supply. Delivered 148,500,000 kilowatt-hours of electric energy to Southwestern Power Administration for distribution and sale, and released 1,602,549 acre-feet of water through tubrines. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was started in August 1939 and was completed for the dam, spillway, and outlet works in February 1944. Impoundment of power pool began January 1944 and commercial power generation was started March 1945 with first unit operating. Authorized work is complete except for installation of third and fourth power units, and additional perimeter access roads. (Work discontinued on access roads, has been recommended for deferral.) 19-12 TULSA, OKLA., DISTRICT 52. EUFAULA LAKE, CANADIAN RIVER BASIN, OKLA. Location. On Canadian River, at river mile 27.0, about 12 miles east of Eufaula, McIntosh County, Okla. (See Geological Survey maps for Okmulgee, Canadian, McAlester, and Sans Bois, Okla., quadrangles, scale 1:125,000.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1970. Federal cost is $121,801,719, of which $551,900 is Code 710 funds. Local cooperation. Completed as required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. No noteworthy rises occurred above the lake. Estimated monetary benefits attributed to Eufaula Lake operations for prevention of flood damages total $34,629,000 to September 30, 1981. A total of 1,556 acre-feet of water was withdrawn for water supply. (See table 19-F for pool elevations and storages during fiscal year.) Delivered 47,810,300 kilowatt-hours of electric energy to Southwestern Power Administration for distribution and sale, and released 620,156 acre-feet of water through turbines. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in December 1956 and project placed in full flood control operation in February 1964. Project is complete except for additional recreation facilities. Commercial power was generated on number 1 July 1964, on number 2 September 1964, and on number 3 August 1964. 53. FORT GIBSON LAKE, GRAND (NEOSHO) RIVER BASIN, OKLA. Location. On Grand (Neosho) River, river mile 7.7, about 5 miles north and east of Fort Gibson, Muskogee County, Okla. (See Geological Survey maps for Muskogee and Pryor, Okla., quadrangles, scale 1:125,000; and Wagoner, Okla., quadrangle, scale 1:62,500.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1969. Federal cost is $43,596,858, of which $1,140,596 is Code 710 funds. The estimated cost for the addition of power units 5 and 6 is $19,900,000. Local cooperation. Completed as required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. No noteworthy rises occurred above the lake. Estimated monetary benefits attributed to Fort Gibson Lake operations for prevention of flood damages total $27,741,000 to September 30, 1981. (See table 19-F for pool elevations and storages during fiscal year.) A total of 15.379 acre-feet were released to the city of Muskogee, Okla. for water supply. Delivered 71,462,400 kilowatt-hours of electric energy to Southwestern Power Administration for distribution and sale, and released 1,345,417 acre-feet of water through turbines. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in March 1942 with constrtction of temporary field office buildings, but further construction at project was held in abeyance during World War II. Construction of concrete dam and spillway, largest single feature of project, started in May 1946 and was completed in June 1950. Fourth generator installed and project placed in full operation in September 1953. Additional studies are being conducted to determine the feasibility of adding additional hydro-power units. 54. KEYSTONE LAKE, ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN, OKLA. Location. On Arkansas River, river mile 538.8, near Sand Springs, Okla., and about 15 miles west of Tulsa, Okla. (See Geological Survey map for Hominy, Okla., quadrangle, scale 1:125,000; Skedee and Yale, Okla., quadrangles, scale 1:62,500; and Keystone Dam, quadrangle, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1970. Federal cost is $123,126,175, of which $448,656 is Code 710 funds. Local cooperation. Completed as required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Delivered 80,118,100 kilowatt-hours of electric energy to Southwestern Power Administration for distribution and sale, and released 1,131,269 acre-feet of water through turbines. No noteworthy rises occurred above the lake. Water supply usage totaled 7,528 acre-feet. Low-flow release requirements were met by power releases. Estimated monetary benefits attributed to operation of Keystone Lake for prevention of flood damages total $81,889,000 to September 30, 1981. (See table 19-F for pool elevations and storages during fiscal year.) Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in January 1957 and the project placed in flood control operation in September 1964. No. 1 generating unit became operational on May 21, 1968 and No. 2 on May 2, 1968. 55. MARKHAM FERRY RESERVOIR, GRAND (NEOSHO) RIVER BASIN, OKLA. Location. On Grand (Neosho) River, river mile 47.4, about 8 miles southeast of city of Pryor, Mayes County, Okla. (See Geological Survey maps for Pryor and Vinita, Okla., quadrangles, scale 1:125,000.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see page 605 of Annual Report for 1969. Federal cost was $6,908,756. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Flood control storage in the project was operated by the Grand River Dam Authority (an agency of the State of Okla.) under the direction of the Corps of Engineers. No noteworthy rises occurred above the reservoir. Estimated monetary benefits attributed to the operation of Markham Ferry Reservoir for flood damage prevention total $5,466,000 to September 30, 1981. (See table 19-F for pool elevations and storages during fiscal year.) Condition at end of fiscal year. Federal participation in project is complete. 56. PENSACOLA LAKE, GRAND (NEOSHO) RIVER BASIN, OKLA. Location. On Grand (Neosho) River, river mile 77.0, next to town of Disney, Mayes County, Okla. (See Geological Survey maps for Pryor, Wyandotte, and Vinita, Okla., and Siloam Springs, Ark., quadrangles, scale 1:125,000.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1969. Federal cost was $52,126. Local cooperation. Completed as required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Flood control storage in project was operated by Grand.River Dam Authority (an agency of State of Oklahoma) under direction of the Corps of Engineers. No noteworthy rises occurred above the lake. Estimated monetary benefits attributed to Pensacola Lake operations for prevention of flood damages total $36,787,000 to September 30, 1981. (See table 19-F for pool elevations and storages during fiscal year.) Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete. 57. ROBERT S. KERR LOCK AND DAM AND RESERVOIR, ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN, OKLA. Location. On Arkansas River at navigation mile 336.2, about 8 miles south of Sallisaw, LeFlore County, Okla. (See Geological Survey maps for Robert S. Kerr Dam, Keota, Vian, Sallisaw, Stigler NE, and Webbers Falls, Okla., quadrangles, scale 1:24,000 and Defense Mapping Agency map, Fort Smith, Ark., scale 1:250,000.) 19-13 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1972. Robert S. Kerr Lock and Dam and Reservoir is a unit of the McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System. Federal cost is $94,578,237 of which $24,004 is Code 710 funds. Local cooperation. See section 2 of this report. Terminal facilities. Seven sites have been developed for handling coal, grain, construction aggregates, and miscellaneous cargo. The facilities are considered adequate for present traffic. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Delivered 170,223,900 kilowatt-hours of electric energy to Southwestern Power Administration for distribution and sale, and released 4,221,186 acre-feet of water through turbines. (See table 19-F for pool elevations and storages during fiscal year.) Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in April 1964 and closure was completed in October 1970. Lock and dam became operational for navigation in December 1970. Power units number 1, number 2, number 3, and number 4 were placed in operation in October, July, September, and November 1971, respectively. 58. TENKILLER FERRY LAKE, ILLINOIS RIVER BASIN, OKLA. Location. On Illinois River, river mile 12.8, about 7 miles northwest of Vian and 7 miles northeast of Gore, Sequoyah County, Okla. (See Geological Survey maps for Muskogee and Tahlequah, Okla., and Ark., quadrangles, scale 1:125,000; and Webbers Falls, Okla., quadrangle, scale 1:62,500.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1969. Federal cost is $23,954,780, of which $1,295,322 is Code 710 funds. Local cooperation. Completed as required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Additional recreation facilities were constructed. No noteworthy rises occurred above the lake. Estimated monetary benefits attributed to Tenkiller Lake operations for prevention of flood damages total $10,524,000 to September 30, 1981. (See table 19-F for pool elevations and storages during fiscal year.) Delivered 36,676,800 kilowatt-hours of electric energy to Southwestern Power Administration for distribution and sale, and released 236,498 acre-feet of water through turbines. A total of 5,142 acre-feet of water was released for water supply. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in June 1947 and completed in July 1953. Commercial sale of power started November 1953, with unit number 2. Unit number 1 installed December 1953. Work on repair and extension of spillway apron began in July 1960 and was completed in August 1961. 59. WEBBERS FALLS LOCK AND DAM, ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN, OKLA. Location. On Arkansas River at navigation mile 366.6, about 5 miles northwest of Webbers Falls, Muskogee County, Okla. (See Geological Survey maps for Webbers Falls, Keefeton, and Wagoner, Okla., ouadrangles, scale 1:62,500 and Defense Mapping Agency map, Fort Smith, Ark., scale 1:250,000.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1977. Project is a unit of the McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System. Federal cost is $83,736,701. Local cooperation. See section 2 of this report. Terminal facilities. Cargo pier, mooring dolphins, warehouse, terminal building, and fuel facility built by Muskogee City-County Port Authority; liquid cargo loading facility and steel unloading facility built by Frontier Steel Company, provide facilities adequate for present traffic. Operations and results during fiscal year. Generating units were removed from service because of cracked turbine shaft welds (unit number 1 on 21 April, unit number 3 on 9 June, and unit number 2 on 23 June.) The units are still out of service for engineering study, determination of repair method, and contracting for actual repair. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in January 1965, and the project was placed in useful operation in November 1970. Lock and dam became operational for navigation in December 1970. Power units number 1, number 2, and number 3 were placed in operation in August, September, and November 1973, respectively. The project is complete. General Investigations 60. SURVEYS Fiscal year cost was $2,712,597, of which $289,324 was for special studies (Arkansas River and Tributaries Hydropower), $2,205,028 was for flood damage prevention, $87,957 for coordination with other agencies, and $130,289 for preauthorization studies (Phase 1 Prosperity Lake.) 61. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Fiscal year costs were $541,616 of which $286,273 was for inspection of dams, $251,521. for flood plain management services, and $3,822 for hydrologic studies. 19-14 TULSA, OKLA., DISTRICT TABLE 19-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to in Text Project Funding FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 Sept. 30, 1981 1. Big and Little Sallisaw Creeks Navigation, Arkansas River Basin, Okla. 3. Bank Stabilization &Channel Rectification, Arkansas River, Ark. & Okla. 5. Low Head Locks & Dams, Okla. (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 6. Maintenance & Repair Fleet & Marine Terminals, Okla. 7. Red River Waterway LA, AR, OK and TX, Index AR to Denison Dam 9. Poteau River Navigation, Arkansas River Basin, Okla. 10. Arcadia Lake, Deep Fork River Basin, Okla. 11. Ark-Red River Basins Chloride Control, 11A. (AREA VIII) 12. Big Pine Lake, Red River Basin, Tex. 13. Birch Lake, Verdigris River Basin, Okla. 14. Candy Lake Verdigris River Basin, Okla. 15. Canton Lake, Arkansas River Basin, Okla. 16. Clayton Lake, Little River Basin, Okla. New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost $ 75,000 $ 85,000 71,348 67,816 4,913 168,700 167,897 168,325 2,446,200 2,182,600 2,851,910 2,068,254 279,000 356,446 171,400 175,149 $ 75,000 89,746 $ - 5,360 $ 270,507 269,777 - - 12,700,038 - - 12,700,038 - - 2,689,734 - - 2,689,734 - - 115,576,600 -598 2,076 115,485,466 2,745,086 2,339,300 25,612,599 2,145,559 3,140,477 25,568,264 - - 119,330 - - 119,330 - - 2,750,000 - - 2,750,000 128,214 182,200 1,564,965 132,218 180,479 1,639,923 - 105,000 105,000 - 92,551 92,551 40,000 552,000 -76,000 - 586,952 35,947 428,999 50,451 604 586,952 - 872,900 3,122,000 9,799,000 15,344,509 247,418 816,218 2,317,627 10,342,119 14,988,076 5,185,000 6,012,000 2,140,000 1,900,000 25,705,208 5,196,394 5,738,506 1,826,999 2,311,281 25,397,509 402,900 17,000 124,692 189,500 3,512,247 407,014 8,293 123,494 199,522 3,511,979 995,000 3,426,000 9,310,000 8,660,000 27,991,000 4,201,879 4,537,974 9,425,096 8,671,380 27,830,098 -11,130 316,500 25,000 - 1,701,670 38,766 252,742 101,778 506 1,699,873 706,000 59,000 - - 13,549,170 1,014,646 1,070,200 154,507 9168 13,548,848 258,800 526,200 467,396 558,800 1,916,201 945,663 1,315,346 112,962 677,051 5,206,954 1,036,000 1,785,000 -230,000 186,000 4,949,922 945,663 1,315,347 112,962 295,161 4,825,065 -244 46,000 113,000 4,000 10,919,727 -123 21,846 126,861 6,889 10,912,323 1,196,900 833,600 709,876 853,400 9,896,673" 1,224,134 630,011 774,757 967,804 9,864,146' - - - - 291,106 - - - - 291,106 7,795,000 8,535,000 14,132,000 7,785,000 47,522,479 7,801,706 8,970,795 13,900,317 5,743,329 45,149,897 19-15 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 19-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to in Text Project Funding FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 Sept. 30, 1981 17. Copan Lake. New Work -Verdigris River Basin, Okla. 18. Council Grove Lake, Grand (Neosho) River Basin, Kans. 19. El Dorado Lake, Walnut River Basin, Kans. 20. Elk City Lake, Verdigris River Basin, Kans. 21. Fall River Lake, Verdigris River Basin, Kans. 22. Fort Supply Lake, North Canadian River Basin, Okla. 23. Great Salt Plains Lake, Arkansas River Basin, Okla. 24. Heyburn Lake, Arkansas River Basin, Okla. 25. Hugo Lake, Kiamichi River Basin, Okla. 26. Hulah Lake, Verdigris River Basin, Okla. 27. Joe Creek, Arkansas River Basin, Okla. 28. John Redmond Dam & Reservoir, Grand (Neosho) River, Kans. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Minor Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost $ 9,953,000 $ 7,796,000 12,902,005 7,746,100 25,000 13,106 412,500 365,493 9,329,000 7,334,092 485,500 487,766 347,700 320,459 477,600 488,987 158,000 152,608 368,400 438,160 -8,500 -23,991 771,500 795,580 -125 135 301,700 466,861 1,000,000 975,744 9,978 2,892 636,900 756,422 11,894 732,000 413,812 9,185,000 12,542,560 1,000,120 891,053 2,000 1,969 775,800 427,977 85,000 8,193 428,000 328,263 257,100 211,640 16,000 1,342 591,000 279,557 -329 -38,262 659,100 641,770 31,000 1,300 583,000 514,466 940,000 1,005,442 -1,000 6,107 771,100 697,055 $ 10,405,000 $ 8,050,000 $ 64,871,999 11,308,037 8,422,582 64,669,229 - 12,221 11,610,829 - 6,124 11,604,732 459,607 474,500 5,146,276 381,161 575,342 5,135,451 13,060,000 5,612,000 73,359,149 13,682,428 5,280,005 72,536,757 - 74,100 74,100 - 70,967 70,967 - - 19,042,990 - - 19,042,990 528,000 531,900 5,073,7328 633,308 543,923 5,070,8968 - 11,000 10,517,393 31 5,989 10,512,382 321,158 416,100 5,269,476 441,332 668,571 5,260,691 43,000 -90 7,723,134 114,676 5,034 7,723,127 371,984 436,300 5,299,2748 438,546 449,162 5,273,3668 - - 4,626,270 - - 4,626,270 215,828 259,000 3,291,207 246,614 260,913 3,272,292 - -22 2,518,672 12,369 2,268 2,518,673 384,411 382,800 4,184,2058 673,450 394,637 4,164,9428 232,000 20,000 37,704,742 296,684 15,930 37,659,102 716,000 753,300 4,581,525 681,381 815,829 4,559,265 -16,300 581 11,133,333 13,021 960 11,133,333 460,799 595,300 6,210,493 446,663 672,020 6,188,268 - - 135,718 - - 135,718 699,270 - 3,000,000 707,707 1,692 2,998,6267 - - 28,151,515 688 - 28,151,515 980,475 712,700 7,168,7538 619,647 1,126,866 7,144,277' 19-16 TULSA, OKLA., DISTRICT TABLE 19-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to in Text Project Funding FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 Sept. 30, 1981 29. Kaw Lake, Arkansas River Basin, Okla. 30. Lake Kemp, Wichita River Basin, Tex. 31. Lukfata Lake, Little River Basin, Okla. 32. Marion, Kans. 33. Marion Lake, Grand (Neosho) River Basin, Kans. 34. Oologah Lake, Verdigris River Basin, Okla. 35. Optima Lake, North Canadian River Basin, Okla. 36. Pat Mayse Lake, Red River Basin, Tex. 37. Pearson - Skubitz Big Hill Lake, Verdigris River Basin, Kans. 38. Pine Creek Lake, Little River Basin, Okla. 40. Shidler Lake, Arkansas River Basin, Okla. 41. Skiatook Lake, Verdigris River Basin, Okla. 42. Toronto Lake, Verdigris River Basin, Kans. 43. Towanda Lake, Whitewater River Basin, Kans. New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 2,901,000 1,424,414 779,800 775,486 81,400 82,820 550,000 1,574,727 1,414,100 1,398,777 102,000 93,778 -5,000 - 283 -180 - 1,475,000 1,217,082 2,526,815 - 5,000 - 4,335 449,600 974,700 544,805 453,167 - 2,000 - 1,360 829,100 864,300 751,369 829,451 4,700,000 2,759,000 4,945,015 2,640,755 - 219,000 - 168,155 -215 20,500 2,141 19,121 545,000 538,000 543,031 459,415 1,300,000 3,170,000 1,235,008 3,089,379 - 3,500 - 3,107 478,600 493,300 455,507 493,851 - 10,000 - 3,032 6,955,000 7,944,000 6,381,955 8,303,830 - 6,400 - 409 169,900 237,400 199,067 205,501 170,000 100,000 195,710 106,201 19-17 780,000 1,525,126 1,703,498 1,362,054 88,964 90,348 -450,000 -370,778 665 440,064 528,212 6,000 552 961,983 989,024 210,000 754,067 243,054 268,568 618,000 599,608 3,900,000 3,837,763 393 463,918 455,755 25,000 20,526 15,187,000 14,715,818 -5,078 943 178,627 186,032 2,749 -200,000 282,621 1,099,500 1,482,798 89,700 97,267 162 75,000 70,848 12,779 12,779 488,800 916,471 -93 5,222 796,600 875,917 3,000 259,501 427,500 438,420 -29 1,350 425,300 521,751 3,220,000 2,972,698 98,000 95,437 510,100 521,602 -10,896 17,873,000 13,014,349 104 291,000 308,472 5,276 108,812,650 108,672,964 5,801,108 5,763,093 7,637,702 7,637,702 854,734 853,250 1,424,685 1,424,613 5,600,200 5,466,394 13,335,317 13,335,317 5,525,1328 5,503,0508 46,689,3291 46,688,5561 9,888,2118 9,873,7428 47,163,438 47,224,665 889,554 875,143 9,310,661 9,310,661 4,384,1838 4,364,2288 15,007,116 14,458,515 98,000 95,437 20,304,909 20,304,909 4,427,1588 4,401,8698 568,190 545,852 66,059,282 60,091,530 13,896,324 13,896,324 3,036,403 3,027,140 392,400 392,361 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 19-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to in Text Project Funding FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 Sept. 30, 1981 44. Waurika Lake, Red River Basin, Okla. 45. Wister Lake, Poteau River Basin, Okla. 50. Broken Bow Lake, Little River Basin, Okla. 51. Denison Dam-Lake Texoma, Red River Basin, Tex. & Okla. 52. Eufaula Lake, Canadian River Basin, Okla. 53. Fort Gibson Lake, Grand (Neosho) River Basin, Okla. 54. Keystone Lake, Arkansas River Basin, Okla. 56. Pensacola Lake, Grand (Neosho) River Basin, Okla. 57. Robert S. Kerr Lock & Dam & Reservoir, Arkansas River Basin, Okla. 58. Tenkiller Ferry Lake, Illinois River Basin, Okla. New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Minor rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 7,900,000 3,439,000 9,404,004 5,063,042 184,200 264,900 175,065 248,562 -_ -_ 388,300 384,700 393,731 336,423 -413 - 50 - 623,200 712,000 631,453 671,990 -226,350 51,829 68,793 48,714 2,460,600 3,799,900 2,513,570 3,107,684 153 163,000 34,590 18,972 2,166,400 2,513,200 2,151,687 1,912,989 149,965 274,000 165,886 265,131 1,809,400 1,847,800 1,818,537 1,749,462 -162 10,000 2,538 9,372 1,396,200 1,654,900 1,394,959 1,324,332 4,100 5,000 3,891 4,356 141,000 1,000,000 143,374 990,351 1,989,100 2,446,000 2,062,986 2,015,673 - 63,000 - 11,013 1,519,300 1,542,100 1,482,173 1,541,972 1,611,000 2,194,211 691,514 513,241 337,164 334,963 781,343 806,147 76,000 71,571 2,990,716 3,396,576 300 142,674 2,161,112 2,308,543 257,400 181,363 1,713,098 1,697,614 1,797,605 2,027,357 4,950 5,593 -35,800 7,199 1,764,802 2,198,796 207,000 47,846 1,374,064 1,319,942 920,000 66,591,050 945,501 66,057,188 586,600 1,747,214 776,517 1,728,940 - 10,501,226 - 10,501,226 391,400 5,608,445 432,384 5,588,855 - 41,222,692 - 41,222,692 855,400 6,731,256 872,268 6,714,010 44,000 67,913,9012 59,949 67,864,4732 3,245,200 41,037,6878 3,369,946 40,833,0288 - 46,237 - 46,237 -301 121,801,747' 1,325 121,801,719' 2,079,800 24,891,1738 2,477,739 24,763,9998 -14,224 43,618,378' 67,873 43,596,858' 1,871,500 23,431,7858 1,970,187 23,374,2548 -32 123,126,173' 596 123,126,1756 1,864,200 18,079,5878 1,899,774 17,973,0478 - 52,126 - 52,126 6,900 198,708 6,952 198,550 -13 94,578,237 4,838 94,578,237 1,671,600 20,383,4238 1,738,902 20,354,5508 -29,276 23,961,719' 174,926 23,954,7808 1,617,400 16,993,961 1,678,213 16,915,302 19-18 TULSA, OKLA., DISTRICT TABLE 19-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to in Text Project Funding FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 Sept. 30, 1981 59. Webbers Falls Lock New Work & Dam, Arkansas Approp. 2,500 - - - 83,738,277 River Basin, Okla. Cost 14,051 183 - - 83,736,701 Maint. Approp. 1,993,500 2,248,000 1,710,260 4,515,700 19,108,741 Cost 2,034,794 2,205,273 1,681,864 3,356,093 17,813,570 1. Excludes $81,460 contributed funds and $1,348,816 special funds. 2. Includes $433,539 Emergency Relief funds. Excludes $1,256,068 from special contributed funds. 3. Excludes $299,803 contributed funds and $13,211,728 special funds. 4. Excludes $134,919 contributed funds. Includes $49,581 Public Works acceleration funds. 5. Excludes $5,366,231 special funds. 6. Excludes $946 contributed funds. Includes $39,999 Public Works acceleration funds. 7. Excludes $4,470,000 contributed funds. 8. Excludes $2,230,300 special recreation use fees funds as follows: Canton Lake 119,300 Council Grove Lake 33,700 Eufaula Lake 284,200 Fort Gibson Lake 256,100 Lake Texoma Low Head L&D Marion Lake Oologah Lake Pat Mayse Lake Robert S. Kerr Res. Tenkiller Lake Heyburn Lake Pine Creek Lake Webbers Falls Kaw Lake Fort Supply Lake Hugo Lake John Redmond Res. Keystone Lake Elk City Lake 19-19 421,600 600 45,200 78,400 45,400 24,900 514,600 2,000 13,000 16,000 57,500 39,000 64,000 35,000 170,400 10,000 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 19-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents December 31, 1970 October 22, 1976 October 23, 1962 November 7, 1966 December 31, 1970 March 7, 1974 October 22, 1976 July 24, 1946 and October 22, 1976 October 23, 1962 October 23, 1962 October 23, 1962 October 27, 1965 June 30, 1948 (as amended through 1976) July 24, 1946 December 12, 1970 July 24, 1946 October 23, 1962 ARCADIA LAKE, OKLA. (See Section 10 of Text) Construction of reservoir for flood control, water supply, water quality control, and recreation purposes. Delete water quality benefits and include water supply benefits. ARK-RED RIVER BASINS CHLORIDE CONTROL (See Section 11 of Text) Construction of experimental water quality study projects near Estelline and Guthrie, Tex. Project for water quality control, designated as Part I. Project for water quality control, designated as Part II. Modify 1966 and 1970 Acts-Inititated construction of Area VIII features of the project consisting of low-flow dam pumping station, pipeline, and brine dam. Modify 1970 Act-Gave construction approval to the Secretary of the Army. BIG AND LITTLE SALLISAW CREEKS NAVIGATION, OKLA. (See Section 1 of Text) Construction of navigation channel 9 feet deep with a minimum width of 100 feet from Robert S. Kerr Lock & Dam & Reservoir to near Sallisaw, Okla., and a 400- by 500-foot turning basin. BIG PINE LAKE, OKLA. (See Section 12 of Text) Construction of reservoir for flood control, water supply, recreation, and fish and wildlife purposes. CANDY LAKE, OKLA. (See Section 14 of Text) Construction of reservoir for flood control, water supply, water quality control, recreation, and fish and wildlife purposes. COPAN LAKE, OKLA. (See Section 17 of Text) Construction of reservoir for flood control, water supply, water quality control, recreation, and fish and wildlife purposes. EL DORADO LAKE, KANS. (See Section 19 of Text) Construction of reservoir to provide flood control, water supply, water quality control, and recreation. JOE CREEK, TULSA, OKLA. (See Section 27 of Text) Channel improvement for local flood control. LOW HEAD LOCKS & DAMS (See Section 5 of Text) Construction of three lock & dam units, including turning basin, channel cutoffs and enlargement to provide a navigable channel 9 feet deep with a minimum width of 250 feet from Ft. Smith, Ark., to vicinity of Catoosa, Okla. MARION, KANS. (See Section 32 of Text) Local protection works for flood control, diversion channel, levee, and appurtenant structures. MAINTENANCE & REPAIR FLEET & MARINE TERMINALS (See Section 6 of Text) Wharf, office and storage building, storage space, and operating areas for floating maintenance and repair fleet. PEARSON-SKUBITZ BIG HILL LAKE, KANS. (See Section 37 of Text) Construction of reservoir for flood control, water supply, and recreation purposes. H. Doc. 229, 91st Cong., 2d sess. PL 94-587 S. Doc. 105, 87th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 110, 89th Cong., 2d sess. Chief of Engineers Report, May 6, 1970 PL 91-611 PL 93-251 PL 94-587 H. Doc. 6407, 79th Cong., 2d sess. PL 525, 79th Cong., as amended by PL 94-587 H. Doc. 71, 88th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 563, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 563, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 232, 89th Cong., 1st sess. Section 205, PL 858-80. H. Doc. 758, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 256, 91st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 758, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 572, 87th Cong., 2d sess. 19-20 TULSA, OKLA., DISTRICT TABLE 19-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents July 4, 1960 (as amended Dec. 31, 1970) July 24, 1946 August 3, 1955 July 3, 1958 October 23, 1962 August 13, 1968 October 27, 1965 October 23, 1962 October 27, 1965 December 30, 1963 POTEAU RIVER NAVIGATION, ARK. & OKLA. (See Section 9 of Text) Construction of navigation channel 9 feet deep and 130 feet wide from the confluence of the Poteau River and the Arkansas River upstream on the Poteau 1.7 miles to Fort Smith, Ark., with a turning basin just upstream from Fort Smith. RED RIVER BELOW DENISON DAM (TULSA DISTRICT) (See Section 39 of Text) Construct Boswell, Hugo, and Millwood Lakes, and Bank Stabilization. Walnut Bayou Channel Improvements. Modify Millwood; construct Pine Creek, Lukfata, Broken Bow, DeQueen, Gillham, and Dierks Lakes. Construct Clayton and Tuskahoma Lakes. Modify 1946 Act-Construct bank stabilization, Index, Ark., to Denison Dam. SHIDLER LAKE, OKLA. (See Section 40 of Text) Construction of reservoir for flood control, water supply, water quality control, and recreation purposes. SKIATOOK LAKE, OKLA. (See Section 41 of Text) Construction of reservoir for flood control, water supply, water quality control, recreation, and fish and wildlife purposes. TOWANDA LAKE, KANS. (See Section 43 of Text) Construction of reservoir for flood control, water supply, water quality control, and recreation purposes. WAURIKA LAKE, OKLA. (See Section 44 of Text) Construction of reservoir for flood control, irrigation, and conservation purposes. Section 107, PL 86-645. H. Doc. 602, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 488, 83rd Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 170, 85th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 145, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 304, 90th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 242, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 563, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 232, 89th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 33, 88th Cong., 1st sess. 19-21 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 19-C ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN: MULTIPLE-PURPOSE PLAN (See Section 2 of Text) Feature River River Mile Nearest Town Locks and Dams: W.D. Mayo, No. 14 Arkansas 319.61 Redland, Okla. Robert S. Kerr, No. 15 Arkansas 336.21 Cowlington, Okla. Webbers Falls, No. 16 Arkansas 366.61 Gore, Okla. Chouteau, No. 17 Verdigris 401.51 Okay, Okla. Newt Graham, No. 18 Verdigris 421.61 Inola, Okla. Appurtenant Navigation Features: Channel cutoffs and enlargements Verdigris (2) Muskogee to Catoosa, Okla. Dredging Arkansas (2) Bank stabilization and channel rectification Arkansas 295.4 to Fort Smith, Ark., to 336.2 Robert S. Kerr Lock & Dam Robert S. Kerr Marine Terminal Arkansas 339.01 Sallisaw, Okla. Lakes: Canton North Canadian 394.3 Canton, Okla. Elk City Elk River 8.7 Elk City, Kans. Eufaula Canadian 27.0 Eufaula, Okla. Fall River Fall River 54.2 Fall River, Kans. Fort Gibson Grand (Neosho) 7.7 Fort Gibson, Okla. Keystone Arkansas 538.8 Sand Springs, Okla. Markham Ferry Grand (Neosho) 47.4 Locust Grove, Okla. Neodesha' Verdigris 222.8 Neodesha, Kans. Oologah Verdigris 90.2 Oologah, Okla. Pensacola Grand (Neosho) 77.0 Disney, Okla. Tenkiller Illinois 12.8 Gore, Okla. Toronto Verdigris 271.5 Toronto, Kans. Wister Poteau 60.9 Wister, Okla. 1. Navigation miles-McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System. 2. As required for channel 9 feet deep. 3. See Table 19-I, "Other Authorized Flood Control Projects." TABLE 19-D ARKANSAS-RED RIVER BASINS CHLORIDE CONTROL, PART I - WICHITA RIVER CHLORIDE CONTROL PLAN, TEX. (See Section 11A of Text) PROJECT RIVER SITE' NEAREST TOWN Area VII North Fork of the Wichita 213.0 Paducah, TX Area VIII South Fork of the Wichita 74.9 Guthrie, TX Truscott Brine Lake Bluff Creek 3.6 Truscott, TX Area X Middle Fork of the Wichita 19.7 Paducah, TX 1. Approximate River Mile Above Mouth 19-22 TULSA, OKLA., DISTRICT TABLE 19-E ARKANSAS-RED RIVER BASINS CHLORIDE CONTROL PART II - RED RIVER PLAN, OKLA., AND TEXAS (See Section 11B of Text) PROJECT RIVER SITE' NEAREST TOWN Area VI Elm Fork River 54.0 Erick, OK Area VI, Brine Lake Fish Creek 1.6 Erick, OK Area IX Middle Pease River 5.0 Childress, TX Area XIII Jonah Creek 2.2 Childress, TX Area XIV Salt Creek 1.0 Childress, TX Area XV Little Red River 14.0 Estelline, TX Crowell Brine Lake Fish Creek 1.6 Erick, TX 1. Approximate River Mile Above Mouth TABLE 19-E ARKANSAS-RED RIVER BASINS CHLORIDE CONTROL (Continued) PART II - ARKANSAS RIVER PLAN, OKLA. (See Section 11C of Text) PROJECT RIVER SITE' NEAREST TOWN Area I Salt Fork, Arkansas Riv. 103.3 Jet. OK Area II-III Cimarron, River 290.4 Freedom, OK Englewood Lake Cimarron River 346.5 Englewood, KS Area IV Salt Creek 25.3 Southard, OK 1. Approximate River Mile Above Mouth 19-23 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 19-F POOL ELEVATIONS AND STORAGES DURING FISCAL YEAR See Section in Text Project Start End Maximum Minimum 5B. W. D. Mayo L&D, Elevation (feet, MSL) 412.79 412.17 413.26 411.69 5C. 5D. 13. Arkansas River Basin, Okla. Chouteau L&D, Verdigris River Basin, Okla. Newt Graham L&D, Verdigris River Basin, Okla. Birch Lake, Verdigris River Basin, Okla. 15. Canton Lake, Arkansas River Basin, Okla. 18. Council Grove Lake, Grand (Neosho) River Basin, Kans. 19. El Dorado Lake, Walnut River Basin, Kans. 20. Elk City Lake, Verdigris River Basin, Kans. 21. Fall River Lake, Verdigris River Basin, Kans. 22. Fort Supply Lake, North Canadian River Basin, Okla. 23. Great Salt Plains Lake, Arkansas River Basin, Okla. 24. Heyburn Lake, Arkansas River Basin, Okla. 25. Hugo Lake, Kiamichi River Basin, Okla. 26. Hulah Lake, Verdigris River Basin, Okla. 28. John Redmond Dam & Reservoir, Grand (Neosho) River Basin, Kans. 29. Kaw Lake, Arkansas River Basin, Okla. 30. Lake Kemp, Wichita River Basin, Tex. 33. Marion Lake, Grand (Neosho) River Basin, Kansas 34. Oologah Lake, Verdigris River Basin, Okla. 35. Optima Lake, N. Canadian River Basin, Okla. 36. Pat Mayse Lake, Red River Basin, Tex. 37. Pearson-Skubitz Big Hill Lake, Verdigris River Basin, Okla. 38. Pine Creek Lake, Little River Basin, Okla. 42. Toronto Lake, Verdigris River Basin, Kans. Storage (acre-feet) Elevation (feet, MSL) Storage (acre-feet) Elevation (feet, MSL) Storage (acre-feet) Elevation (feet, MSL) Storage (acre-feet) Elevation (feet, MSL) Storage (acre-feet) Elevation (feet, MSL) Storage (acre-feet) Elevation (feet, MSL) Storage (acre-feet) Elevation (feet, MSL) Storage (acre-feet) Elevation (feet, MSL) Storage (acre-feet) Elevation (feet, MSL) Storage (acre-feet) Elevation (feet, MSL) Storage (acre-feet) Elevation (feet, MSL) Storage (acre-feet) Elevation (feet, MSL) Storage (acre-feet) Elevation (feet, MSL) Storage (acre-feet) Elevation (feet, MSL) Storage (acre-feet) Elevation (feet, MSL) Storage (acre-feet) Elevation (feet, MSL) Storage (acre-feet) Elevation (feet, MSL) Storage (acre-feet) Elevation (feet, MSL) Storage (acre-feet) Elevation (feet, MSL) Storage (acre-feet) Elevation (feet, MSL) Storage (acre-feet) Elevation (feet, MSL) Storage (acre-feet) Elevation (feet, MSL) Storage (acre-feet) Elevation (feet, MSL) Storage (acre-feet) 15,436 14,450 511.28 23,205 532.30 23,952 748.79 17,283 1613.67 98,101 1268.09 31,048 1279.40 270 793.00 32,592 944.59 13,877 2002.34 10,990 511.30 23,250 532.38 24,075 749.29 17,831 1603.80 39,961 1272.32 43,200 1289.79 1279 794.40 38,023 948.73 22,465 2002.97 12,030 1123.75 1125.16 21,480 32,904 759.35 4,983 405.39 169,603 729.30 19,447 1037.40 57,471 1009.75 424,400 1129.13 114,918 1347.93 68,710 635.77 490,102 2720.20 4,918 450.70 122,730 808.90 56 451.65 126,891 897.77 12,952 761.43 6,573 402.51 132,372 727.58 15,086 1039.33 74,398 1008.33 400,879 1134.17 150,310 1348.80 73,600 637.76 546,520 2720.00 4,730 449.76 117,207 813.99 288 438.06 53,981 902.33 24,186 19-24 16,193 13,742 511.69 24,136 532.67 24,521 751.20 19,983 1613.70 98,322 1276.56 57,255 1290.42 1383 796.44 46,761 953.57 36,549 2004.46 14,782 1126.64 47,407 766.85 12,820 412.64 287,223 729.61 20,314 1045.00 137,072 1011.53 455,333 1139.49 204,474 1349.12 75,438 638.68 573,874 2720.65 5,340 454.33 145,378 814.56 330 457.37 172,731 908.68 46,109 510.97 22,501 531.76 23,144 747.34 15,736 1603.70 39,523 1266.87 27,880 1279.00 252 790.69 24,712 942.64 10,556 2001.85 10,204 1123.32 18,384 757.95 4,068 402.51 132,372 725.95 11,628 1035.95 46,157 1007.19 382,702 1128.79 112,818 1347.06 64,031 634.22 448,673 2717.30 2,647 449.76 117,207 808.25 42 438.06 53,981 896.98 11,585 TULSA, OKLA., DISTRICT TABLE 19-F (Continued) POOL ELEVATIONS AND STORAGES DURING FISCAL YEAR Project Start End 44. Waurika Lake, Red River Basin, Okla. 45. Wister Lake, Poteau River Basin, Okla. 47A. Altus Lake, North Fork of Red River, Okla. (B.R.) 47B. Arbuckle Reservoir, Rock Cr., Okla. (B.R.) 47C. Cheney Reservoir, North Fork of Ninnescah River, Kans. (B.R.) 47D. Fort Cobb Reservoir, Pond Cr., Okla. (B.R.) 47E. Foss Reservoir, Washita River, Okla. (B.R.) 47F. Mountain Park (Tom Steed Lake), Otter Cr., Okla. (B.R.) 47G. Norman Res. (Lake Thunderbird), Little River, Okla. (B.R.) 47H. Sanford Res. (Lake Meredith), Canadian River Tex., (B.R.) 50. Broken Bow Lake, Little River Basin, Okla. 51. Denison Dam-Lake Texoma, Red River Basin, Tex. & Okla. 52. Eufaula Lake, Canadian River Basin, Okla. 53. Fort Gibson Lake, Grand (Neosho) River Basin, Okla. 54. Keystone Lake, Arkansas River Basin, Okla. 55. Markham Ferry Reservoir, Grand (Neosho) River Basin, Okla. (G.R.D.A.) 56. Pensacola Lake, Grand (Neosho) River Basin, Okla. (G.R.D.A.) 57. Robert S. Kerr L&D & Reservoir, Arkansas River Basin, Okla. 58. Tenkiller Ferry Lake, Illinois River Basin, Okla. 59. Webbers Falls L&D, Arkansas River Basin, Okla. Elevation (feet, MSL) Storage (acre-feet) Elevation (feet, MSL) Storage (acre-feet) Elevation (feet, MSL) Storage (acre-feet) Elevation (feet, MSL) Storage (acre-feet) Elevation (feet, MSL) Storage (acre-feet) Elevation (feet, MSL) Storage (acre-feet) Elevation (feet, MSL) Storage (acre-feet) Elevation (feet, MSL) Storage (acre-feet) Elevation (feet, MSL) Storage (acre-feet) Elevation (feet, MSL) Storage (acre-feet) Elevation (feet, MSL) Storage (acre-feet) Elevation (feet, MSL) Storage (acre-feet) Elevation (feet, MSL) Storage (acre-feet) Elevation (feet, MSL) Storage (acre-feet) Elevation (feet, MSL) Storage (acre-feet) Elevation (feet, MSL) Storage (acre-feet) Elevation (feet, MSL) Storage (acre-feet) Elevation (feet, MSL) Storage (acre-feet) Elevation (feet, MSL) Storage (acre-feet) Elevation (feet, MSL) Storage (acre-feet) See Section in Text Maximum Minimum 941.62 117,378 475.12 43,933 1534.39 30,413 869.20 66,023 1419.45 147,380 1339.40 69,811 1639.33 160,512 1408.08 71,559 1036.35 104,225 2883.59 223,860 589.29 780,206 612.88 2,313,683 579.43 1,809,165 554.17 368,480 717.33 484,396 619.62 207,151 734.20 1,228,199 459.73 482,853 621.43 527,687 489.58 160,748 943.19 128,925 478.00 62,360 1525.78 12,037 869.86 67,489 1419.27 145,795 1337.16 61,684 1636.33 142,403 1405.83 59,517 1033.95 91,499 2897.74 350,010 586.72 747,635 611.37 2,202,625 579.57 1,821,134 553.59 357,532 719.81 539,491 619.62 207,151 740.56 1,475,519 459.20 461,760 624.06 557,495 489.57 160,641 944.24 136,943 492.88 238,256 1536.92 37,441 873.65 76,359 1421.96 170,494 1339.41 69,849 1639.33 160,512 1408.35 73,095 1036.35 104,225 2897.75 350,110 607.31 1,033,259 620.68 2,986,396 584.80 2,309,460 556.11 406,799 724.80 666,400 620.45 216,475 745.91 1,714,770 460.19 501,978 634.39 685,408 490.40 169,680 940.88 112,271 471.54 26,863 1525.78 12,037 867.61 62,565 1419.09 144,211 1337.16 61,684 1636.29 142,170 1405.77 59,214 1033.95 91,499 2876.14 170,202 586.72 747,635 611.37 2,202,625 578.63 1,741,800 552.18 331,740 716.80 473,320 618.09 190,553 734.00 1,221,000 458.44 431,567 620.92 522,127 488.98 154,397 19-25 - - REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 19-G RED RIVER BELOW DENISON DAM FLOOD CONTROL PLAN (TULSA DISTRICT) (See Section 39 of Text) Project River Site' Nearest Town Boswell Lake2 Boggy Creek 18.9 Boswell Okla. Tuskahoma Lake2 Kiamichi River 118.5 Tuskahoma, Okla. Clayton Lake8 Jackford Creek 2.8 Clayton, Okla. Hugo Lakes Kiamichi River 17.6 Hugo, Okla. Pine Creek Lakes Little River 145.3 Wright City, Okla. Lukfata Lakes Glover Creek 24.5 Glover, Okla. Broken Bow Lake8 Mountain Fork River 20.3 Broken Bow, Okla. DeQueen Lake' Rolling Fork River 22.8 DeQueen, Ark. Gillham Lake' Cossatot River 49.0 Gillham, Ark. Dierks Lake' Saline River 56.6 Dierks, Ark. Millwood Lake' Little River 16.0 Millwood, Ark. Bank Stabilization8 Red River 485.3 Index, Ark. Bank Stabilization' Red River 330.4 Index, Ark. Walnut Bayou' Red River 509.2 Foreman, Ark. 1. River mile above mouth. 2. See Table 19-I "Other Authorized Flood Control Projects." 3. Project is reported separately herein. 4. Project transferred to New Orleans District for operation and maintenance. 5. Project transferred to Little Rock District for operation and maintenance. TABLE 19-H INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 46 of Text) Inspection Date Project 1980 1981 Jenks Levee, Okla. April/October April/October Tulsa-West Tulsa Levees, Okla. April/October July (Periodic) Carthage Levee, Mo. January April/November Enid Diversion Canal and Levee, Okla. May/October May/November Hutchinson Levee, Kans. March/November April/November Wichita and Valley Center, Kans. March April/November South Deer Creek Levee, Okla. April/October April/October Polecat Creek Channel Improvement, Okla. April/October April Florence Levee, Kans. March/October April/September Sand Creek Channel Improvement, Kans. March April/September Walnut Bayou Channel Improvement, Ark. November May Oklahoma City Floodway, Okla. May/December May/November Cherry and Red Fork Creeks, Okla. April/October August Flat Rock Creek, Okla. April/October August Springdale Levee, Ark. July January Deep Fork Channel Improvement, Okla. April/October - Iola Levee, Kans. May April/October Marion Diversion Channel and Levee, Kans. - October Joe Creek Channel Improvement, Tulsa, Okla. August 1. Transferred to Little Rock District 1 October 1980. 19-26 TULSA, OKLA., DISTRICT TABLE 19-I OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 48 of Text) For Last Cost to September 30, 1981 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Ark-Red River Basins Chloride Control, Supplemental Studies3 August Levee, Kans.1 2 Bank Stabilization, Red River Below Denison3 Boswell Lake, Okla.6 Carthage Levee, Mo.3 Cedar Point Lake, Kans.6 Cherry & Red Fork Creeks Channel Improvement, Okla.3 Cow Creek Channel Improvement, Kans. 6 Crutcho Creek Channel Improvement, Okla.' 8 Douglass Lake, Kans. 5 El Dorado, Kans. W. Br., Walnut Riv., Channel Improvement.' ' Enid Levee Floodway, Okla. 3 Experimental Chloride Control Project, Red River Basin, Estelline & Guthrie, Tex.3 Flat Rock Creek Channel Improvement, Tulsa, Okla." Florence Levee, Kans.3 Hutchinson Levee and Channel, Kans.3 Iola Levee, Kans.3 Jenks Levee, Okla.3 Lost & Little Lost Cr., Channel Improvement, Mo.' " Mud Creek Channel Improvement, Okla.' Neodesha Lake, Kans.' Oklahoma City Floodway, Okla.3 Sand Creek Channel Improvement, Kans.3 Sand Lake, Okla.' Spring Creek Channel Improvement, Springdale, Ark. 9 Tulsa and West Tulsa Levee, Okla.3 Turtle Creek Channel Improvement, Yukon, Okla.' 10 Tuskahoma Lake, Okla.6 Walnut Bayou Channel Improvement, Ark. 3 12 West Branch Chisholm Creek Channel Improvement, Kans.3 Wichita and Valley Center Channel Improvement, Kans.3 Winfield Levee, Kans.2 Winfield Levee Modification, Kans.' 1. Reported by Memphis District in 1937; by Little Rock District 1938 and 1939. 2. Completed by Kansas Works Progress Administration. 3. Completed. 4. Inactive. 5. Awaiting appropriation of funds. 6. Placed in deferred status 8 Oct 1981. 7. Not economically justified at this time. 8. Local assurances received but not economically justified at this time. 9. Federal cost limited to $1,000,000. 10. Notice of expiration of authorization after 5 years issued 24 August 1976. 11. Notice of expiration of authorization after 5 years issued 20 July 1977. 12. Transferred to Little Rock District 1 Oct 1980. 19-27 2,863,895 222,105 346,416 261,448 363,720 213,016 - 84,217 14,599 129,220 92,319 743,612 1980 1938 1953 1952 1958 1980 1970 1971 1972 1966 1977 1963 1975 1975 1965 1956 1939 1950 1977 1952 1960 1968 1963 1975 1954 1975 1963 1963 1965 1960 1937 1977 300,028 1,741,000 369,782 3,497,718 22,290 344,797 158,406 173,020 97,910 8,047,512 545,996 1,371,000 2,785,070 144,853 317,675 364,200 12,247,379 98,897 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 19-J FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Section 205, PL 858, 80th Cong., as amended (Preauthorization) (See Section 49 of Text) Fiscal Year Study Identification Cost $ Labette Creek, Parsons, Kans.' 81,823 Arkansas River & Bull Creek, Nickerson, Kans.' 40,167 Haikey Creek, Tulsa, Okla." 24,046 Main Branch Chisholm Creek, Park City, Kans.' 76,309 Center and Swifty, Sarcoxie, Mo.2 4,999 North Canadian Wastewater Treatment Plant, Oklahoma City, Okla.' 81,778 Covington Creek, Wagoner Co., Okla. 2 4,604' Fisher and Anderson Creeks, Sand Springs, Okla.' 26,408 (1) Detailed Project Report and Plans and Specifications (2) Reconnaissance Report (3) Revolving Fund to be Reimbursed (4) Detailed Project Report (5) Plans and Specifications 19-28 KANSAS CITY, MO., DISTRICT* The district comprises a portion of southwestern Iowa; northwestern, central, and western Missouri; northern Kansas; southern Nebraska; and a portion of northeastern Colorado embraced in drainage basin of the Missouri River and tributaries from Rulo, Nebraska, to the mouth. Report on navigation project for section of Missouri River from Sioux City, Iowa, to Rulo, Nebraska, is in report of Omaha District. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Missouri River, Sioux City, Iowa, to Mouth (Rulo, Nebraska, to Mouth) .... 20-2 2. Other Authorized Navigation Projects .......................... 20-2 Flood Control 3. Blue River Channel, Kansas City, Mo. . 20-2 4. Clinton Lake, Wakarusa River, Kans. .. 20-3 5. Gypsum, Gypsum Creek, Kans....... 20-3 6. Harlan County Lake, Republican River, Nebr....................... 20-3 7. Hillsdale Lake, Big Bull Creek, Kans. .. 20-4 8. Kanopolis Lake, Smoky Hill River, Kans. . ........................ 20-4 9. Kansas City, Kansas River, Kans. (1962 Mod.) ................... . 20-4 10. Lawrence, Kanss River, Kans.... ..... 20-5 11. Little Blue River Channel, Mo........ 20-5 12. Little Blue River Lakes, Mo.......... 20-5 13. Long Branch Lake, Little Chariton River, Mo ...................... 20-6 14. Melvern Lake, Marais des Cygnes (Osage) River, Kans................. 20-6 15. Milford Lake, Republican River, Kans. ............................ 20-7 16. Missouri River Levee System, Iowa. Nebr., Kans., and Mo. (Rulo, Nebr. to Mouth) ........................ 20-7 17. Onaga Lake, Vermillion Creek, Kans. .. 20-7 18. Perry Lake Area (Road Improvements), Kans............... 20-8 Flood Control (cont.) Page 19. Perry Lake, Delaware River, Kans ..... 20-8 20. Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program (Kansas City Dist.) ................. 20-8 21. Pomme de Terre Lake, Pomme de Terre River, Mo. .................. 20-9 22. Pomona Lake, One Hundred Ten Mile Creek, Kans. ................ 20-9 23. Rathbun Lake, Chariton River, Iowa .. 20-9 24. Smithville Lake, Little Platte River, Mo. ....................... 20-10 25. Tuttle Creek Lake, Big Blue River, Kans. .................... 20-10 26. Wilson Lake, Saline River, Kans ...... 20-11 27. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ................... 20-11 28. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects .......................... 20-11 29. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ................... . 20-11 Multiple Purpose Projects Including Power 30. Harry S. Truman Dam and Reservoir, Osage River, Mo. ......... 20-12 31. Stockton Lake, Sac River, Mo. ....... 20-12 General Investigations 32. Surveys .......................... 20-13 33. Collection and Study of Basic Data .... 20-13 *All cost and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 20-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 Navigation 1. MISSOURI RIVER, SIOUX CITY, IOWA, TO MOUTH (RULO, NEBR., TO MOUTH) Location. Jefferson, Madison, and Gallatin Rivers conjoin at Three Forks, Mont., to form the Missouri River, which flows southeasterly 2,315 miles (1960 mileage) across or along seven States to the Mississippi River, 17 miles above St. Louis. For description see page 1149, Annual Report for 1932. The river is commercially navigable from Sioux City to the mouth, a distance of 732 miles. The portion of project in Kansas City District extends from Rulo, Nebraska to the mouth, a distance of 498 miles. Previous projects. For details see page 1891 of Annual Report for 1915, and pages 1153 and 1175 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. A channel of 9-foot depth and width not less than 300 feet, to be obtained by revetment of banks, construction of permeable dikes to contract and stabilize waterway, cutoffs to eliminate long bends, closing minor channels, removal of snags, and dredging as required. Improved section (mouth to upper end of Rulo Bend) is 498.4 miles (1960 mileage) long. Ordinary and extreme fluctuations of stage are 16 and 38 feet, respectively. (See table 20-C for authorizing legislation and table 20-B for total cost of existing projects). Local cooperation. Project provides that cooperation from benefited localities may be required, where any improvement may confer special benefit. The receipt of contributions from private parties are to be expended with Government funds upon authorized work where such would be in the interest of navigation, as authorized by 1915 Rivers and Harbors Act. Secretary of the Army approved general principle of cooperative construction on Missouri River below Kansas City on basis that 25 percent of cost of any special installation shall be paid by the United States and 75 percent by local interests. Total contributed by local interests in cooperation with the United States from 1918 to June 30, 1964, was $675,633, of which $8,647 was returned to contributors. Local interests must share in cost of recreation facilities in accordance with provisions of the Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Local interests have contributed $164,185 for cost sharing on construction of recreation in addition to constructing portions of the facilities. Terminal facilities. Facilities for transferring agricultural and petroleum products and other commodities are maintained by private interests at various locations on this section of the river. Present facilities, listed in Table 20-D, are adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. The 1974 Base Line Study of the reach of the Missouri River in the Kansas City District estimated recreation use on the river at 1,250,000 recreation days annually. The projected tonnage on the river for FY 1981 is approximately 2.0 million. Maintenance: Repair of dikes and revetments by contract. In addition, following work was accomplished by hired labor: Construction of environmental gaps and dike and revetment repair, maintenance of U.S. Government dredges in standby status, real estate management, channel reconnaissance, condition studies, surveys and mapping, stream gaging, environmental studies and special working data, engineering and design, surveys and layout of construction, and supervision and administration. There was no dredging because no significant bars or shoals developed. Condition at end of fiscal year. Bank stabalization work on this section of the project (Rulo, Nebr., to mouth) is essentially complete. River access sites have been completed at eleven locations. 2. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS See table 20-E. Flood Control 3. BLUE RIVER CHANNEL, KANSAS CITY, MO. Location. Along the Blue River and tributaries in Jackson County, Missouri. Existing project. Preliminary plans consist of 12.5 miles of improved channel along the Blue River within Kansas City, Missouri. Project was authorized by 1970 Flood Control Act, P.L. 96-611 (H. Doc. 91-332, 91st Cong., 2d sess.). Estimated Federal cost through construction of the project is $141,000,000 and estimated non- Federal cost of lands, damages and relocations is $25,300,000. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies. The city of Kansas City, Missouri, passed a resolution of intent on 9 December 1975 to provide the required assurances of local cooperation when requested. A Section 221 agreement was signed by the city October 8, 1979, but review by the Corps cannot be completed until the city's sources of funding are known. 20-2 KANSAS CITY, MO., DISTRICT Operations and results during fiscal year. Plans and specifications for the first channelization contract were completed. The second contract plans and specifications advanced to 90 percent complete. Condition at end of fiscal year. Preconstruction planning is complete and plans and specs are underway. First and second channelization contracts are nearly ready to advertise. 4. CLINTON LAKE, WAKARUSA RIVER, KANS. Location. Damsite is on Wakarusa River about 4 miles southwest of Lawrence, Kansas, in Douglas County. Lake extends into Shawnee and Osage Counties, Kansas. Existing project. An earthfill dam about 9,250 feet long constructed to a maximum height of about 114 feet above riverbed, with an uncontrolled spillway in left abutment. Total reservoir storage capacity 397,200 acre-feet (258,300 for flood control, 28,500 for sediment reserve, and 110,400 of multipurpose storage for municipal and industrial water supply and recreation). Project was authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act, P.L. 87-874. The estimated Federal cost through construction of the project (1981) is $57,340,000. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938, applies. Reimbursement in the estimated amount of $7,249,000 is required for water supply storage in accordance with Water Supply Act of 1958. A contract was signed by the State on 6 September 1978 and was approved by the Secretary of the Army on 30 October 1978. Utilization of storage was initiated in December 1979. Repayment also began at that time. Operations and results during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1981 was 1,302,200 visitor days. Regular funds, new work: Development of public use facilities was advanced to 99 percent completion. Maintenance: Activities consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was initiated in January 1972 and is 97 percent complete. Work remaining consists of recreation facilities, administrative buildings and interpretive program. 5. GYPSUM, GYPSUM CREEK, KANS. Location. At Gypsum, Saline County, Kansas, on the left bank of Gypsum Creek, 10 miles south of its confluence with Smoky Hill River, 15 miles southeast of Salina, Kansas. Existing project. Plan consists of a levee around the city, a diversion channel, and channel improvement work. Project was selected for construction under Section 205, 1948 Flood Control Act, P.L. 858, as amended. Total Federal cost to essentially complete the project was approximately $2,900,000, and estimated non-Federal cost of lands, damages, and relocations is $278,000. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936 applies. A Section 221 agreement was signed by the City of Gypsum on 14 June 1976 and by the Secretary of the Army on 31 August 1976. Operations and results during fiscal year. Construction was completed in May 1980. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project was complete except for minor deficiencies consisting of a drainage problem created by the project and a need for reseeding of a portion of the project, both of which should be corrected by the end of FY 82. 6. HARLAN COUNTY LAKE, REPUBLICAN RIVER, NEBR. Location. Dam is on main stem of Republican River about 235 miles above confluence of stream with Smoky Hill River. Site is in Harlan County, about 3 miles east of Republican City and 13 miles west of Franklin, Nebraska. Existing project. An earthfill dam about 107 feet above streambed and a total length of 11,827 feet, including a gate-controlled, concrete, gravity-type spillway section near center of dam. Reservoir provides storage capacity of 850,000 acre-feet (500,000 for flood control and 350,000 for irrigation and sedimentation allowance). Project is a unit of the Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin program for flood control and other purposes in Missouri River Basin authorized by 1938 Flood Control Act, P.L. 761, as modified by 1941 Flood Control Act, P.L. 228, and expanded by 1944 Flood Control Act, P.L. 534. Initial cost of constructing the project was $45,279,532. Total estimated Federal cost of project (1981), including $1,017,623 for major rehabilitation work and $5,200,000 supplemental recreation development (Code 710), is $51,497,155. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1981 was 1,015,000 visitor days. Regular funds, new work: Supplemental recreational development activity during the year consisted of completion of Methodist Cove shower building. Maintenance: Activities included forestation by contract, road resurfacing, replacement of water distribution system in the administration area, dredging and construction of retention dikes in recreation areas, and or- 20-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 dinary operation and maintenance. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of project was initiated in August 1946 and completed in December 1952. Major rehabilitation work was completed in FY 1968. Future supplemental recreation facilities remain to be designed and constructed. 7. HILLSDALE LAKE, BIG BULL CREEK, KANS. Location. The project is located approximately 12 miles above the mouth of Big Bull Creek, a tributary of the Marais des Cygnes River and about 15 miles southwest of the Kansas City metropolitan area in Miami County, Kansas. Existing project. Plans provide for an earthfill embankment about 11,600 feet long (including approximately 3,300 feet of dike section) and about 75 feet above valley flood plain. A gravity type uncontrolled spillway section is planned. The total reservoir storage capacity is 160,000 acre-feet (81,000 for flood control, 11,000 for sediment reserve, and 68,000 for multipurpose storage for water supply, water quality control, and recreation). Project was authorized by 1954 Flood Control Act, P.L. 780. Estimated Federal cost (1981) through construction of the project is $61,191,000. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act 1938, applies. Local interests must make reimbursement of $20,260,000 for water supply storage in accordance with Water Supply Act of 1958 and share in separable cost allocated to recreation in accordance with Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. The Kansas Water Resources Board signed a contract in January 1974, approved by the Secretary of the Army in April 1974, for the entire 58,000 acre-feet of water supply storage. Local interests have shown no interest in sponsoring recreational development at this time. Therefore, only minimum recreational facilities will be built. Operations and results during fiscal year. Regular funds, new work: Land acquisition, relocations and construction of project features continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was initiated in December 1974 and advanced to 95 percent complete. 8. KANOPOLIS LAKE, SMOKY HILL RIVER, KANS. Location. Dam is on Smoky Hill River about 19 miles west and 16 miles south of Salina, Kansas, and about 205 river miles above mouth of stream. Existing project. An earthfill dam about 131 feet above streambed and a total length of 15,360 feet, including 4,070 feet of dike section on left abutment and 2,550 feet of dike section on right abutment. The reservoir provides storage capacity of 450,000 acre-feet, (400,000 for flood control and 50,000 for recreation and streamflow regulation). Outlet works and spillway are in right abutment. Project is a unit of the Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin program for flood control and other purposes in Missouri River Basin authorized by 1938 Flood Control Act, P.L. 761, as modified by 1941 Flood Control Act, P.L. 228, and expanded by 1944 Flood Control Act, P.L. 534. Initial cost of constructing the project was $12,327,735. Total Federal cost of project (1981), including $930,000, supplemental recreational development (Code 710), is $13,257,735. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1981 was 598,600 visitor days. Regular funds, new work: Supplemental recreational development activity during the year consisted of construction of vault toilets at Venango, Outlet, Boldt Bluff and Yankee Run public use areas by hired labor. Maintenance: Activities consisted of seepage study and ordinary operation and maintenance. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was initiated in June 1940 and the project was placed in operation in May 1948. Future supplemental recreation facilities remain to be designed and constructed. 9. KANSAS CITY, KANSAS RIVER, KANS. (1962 MOD.) Location. Along the Kansas River at Kansas City, Kansas. Existing project. Provides for raising existing levees and floodwall protection in Argentine, Armourdale, and Central Industrial units, and includes necessary bridge alterations and modification of appurtenant facilities. Existing project was authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act, P.L. 87-874 (S. Doc. 122, 87th Cong., 2d sess.). The downstream section of the Argentine unit was assigned to inactive status pending outcome of related lake project. Estimated Federal cost of construction (1981) is $28,600,000 and estimated non-Federal cost of lands, damages, and relocations is $7,630,000. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies. Assurances of local cooperation were received December 4, 1968. Rights-of-way for the Argentine unit upstream section, the Armourdale unit and Central Industrial unit have been furnished. 20-4 KANSAS CITY, MO., DISTRICT Operations and results during fiscal year. Regular funds, new work: Contracts for construction of the Central Industrial unit were financially completed. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the upstream portion of Argentine unit was initiated in May 1971 and completed in February 1974. The Armourdale unit was initiated in November 1973 and completed in September 1976. Construction of the Central Industrial unit was initiated in April 1977 and completed in October 1979. 10. LAWRENCE, KANSAS RIVER, KANS. Location. On Kansas River about 50 miles above its mouth at Lawrence, Douglas County, Kansas. Existing project. Levees along both banks of Kansas River and right bank of Mud Creek, channel improvement for Mud Creek, bank protection, and appurtenant facilities for protection of North Lawrence, Kansas. Project was authorized by 1954 Flood Control Act, P.L. 780 (H. Doc. 642, 81st Cong., 2d sess.). Since the city of Lawrence is no longer interested in sponsoring the South Lawrence unit, this unit was deleted from the project cost estimate and reclassified to an inactive status. By letter dated 9 January 1970, the city of Lawrence indicated an interest in developing a recreational facility on lands obtained for the Lawrence Flood Protection Project. Estimated Federal cost of construction (1981) is $8,617,000 and estimated non-Federal cost of lands, damages, and relocations is $2,130,000. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies, Board of Commissioners of city of Lawrence furnished required assurances June 8, 1965. All required rights-ofway for construction have been furnished. Rightof- way for the recreational facility is available and the city of Lawrence signed a Section 221 agreement on 13 September 1979. The agreement stated Government costs to be $204,305 and city costs to be $88,901 for construction. Operations and results during fiscal year. Plans and specifications were prepared and a contract was awarded for construction of riverfront recreation facilities. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project was initiated June 30, 1967. The Kansas River portion was completed in March 1972 and the Mud Creek portion in July 1978. Government construction of the riverfront recreation facilities was completed on 9 July 1981. The city of Lawrence expects to complete their portion of construction on this recreation area in the spring or summer of 1982. 11. LITTLE BLUE RIVER CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, LITTLE BLUE RIVER, MO. Location. The project is located along the Little Blue River and extends from the head of Missouri River Levee Unit R 351, 22 miles upstream to the vicinity of Wildwood Creek in Jackson County, Missouri. Existing project. The proposed improvements will consist of straightening and enlarging the Little Blue River channel from the head of Missouri River Levee Unit R 351, near Blue Mills Road, upstream to the vicinity of Wildwood Creek, reducing the length of this section from 20.4 to about 15 miles. Alteration of six highway bridges and construction of five new highway bridges and one railroad bridge will be required. Improvements in the vicinity of Lake City will consist of diversion of West Fire Prairie Creek into the Little Blue River and construction of a levee. Project was authorized by Flood Control Act approved August 13, 1968, P.L. 90-483. Estimated Federal cost through construction of the project (1981) is $32,300,000 and estimated non-Federal cost is $3,390,000. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies to the Little Blue River channel improvement works. Jackson County, Missouri, passed a bond issue for sponsorship of the project. Assurances of local cooperation were furnished July 31, 1973. Operations and results during fiscal year. Regular funds, new work: Stage 3, rechannelization, was awarded in September 1977 and is complete. Stage 4 was awarded in October 1978 and is complete. A contract for a drop structure was awarded in September 1980 and is complete. A contract for Stage 5, Phase I was awarded in September 1980 and is complete. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was initiated in December 1974 and is 52 percent complete. Stage 5, Phase II, Lake City, remains to be awarded. 12. LITTLE BLUE RIVER LAKES, MO. Location. This project consists of two lakes in Jackson County, Missouri, located in Kansas City, Missouri, and suburban communities. The Blue Springs Lake site is on the East Fork of the Little Blue River about one-half mile south of U.S. Highway 40 and the Longview Lake site is on the main stem at approximately 109th Street. Existing project. The Blue Springs dam will be an earthfill embankment about 2,500 feet long and rising about 78 feet above the streambed, with an uncontrolled service spillway and uncontrolled outlet conduit. The total reservoir storage 20-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 capacity will be 26,600 acre feet (15,700 for flood control, 10,600 for multipurpose storage for water quality and recreation, and 300 for sedimentation). The Longview dam will be an earthfill embankment about 1,900 feet long and rising about 120 feet above the streambed, with an uncontrolled service spillway and an uncontrolled outlet conduit. The total reservoir storage capacity will be 46,900 acre-feet (24,300 for flood control and 20,600 for multipurpose storage for water quality and recreation and 2,000 for sedimentation). Project was authorized by Flood Control Act approved August 13, 1968, P.L. 90-483 (H. Doc. 169, 90th Cong., 1st sess.). Estimated Federal cost (1981) through construction of the project is $161,000,000. Local cooperation. Section 2 of the Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938, applies. Local interests must share in separable cost allocated to recreation in accordance with Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. The Jackson County Legislature approved a recreation cost-sharing contract on 5 July 1974 which was approved by the Secretary of the Army on 24 June 1976. A supplemental agreement, signed by Jackson County officials on 5 June 1978, and approved by the Secretary of the Army 10 January 1979, revised the existing contract to include additional costs involved in raising the multipurpose pool elevation at the Blue Springs Lake. Estimated reimbursement for recreation is $17,882,000. Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued land acquisition. Contracts were underway for relocation of Longview county roads, utility, and outlet works contracts. Condition at end of fiscal year. Land acquisition was approximately 98 percent complete and overall project was 36 percent complete. 13. LONG BRANCH LAKE, LITTLE CHARITON RIVER, MO. Location. Damsite is on East Fork of Little Chariton River in north-central Missouri about 1 mile west of Macon in Macon County. Existing project. An earthfill dam about 3,800 feet long and about 71 feet high with an uncontrolled outlet conduit and an uncontrolled service spillway in right abutment. Total reservoir storage capacity will be 65,000 acre-feet (29,000 for flood control, 4,000 for sediment reserve, and 32,000 of multipurpose storage for water supply, water quality control, fish and wildlife, and recreation). Project was authorized by 1965 Flood Control Act, P.L. 89-298 (H. Doc. 238, 89th Cong., 1st sess.). Estimated Federal cost (1981) is $19,800,000, and estimated non-Federal cost is $3,300,000. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938, applies. Local interests must make reimbursement of $5,490,000 for water supply storage in accordance with Water Supply Act of 1958 and share in separable cost of $3,300,000 allocated to recreation in accordance with Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. On 15 September 1972 the Secretary of the Army approved a contract signed by the city of Macon, Mo. for water supply and recreation development. Missouri State agencies indicated their intent to sponsor future water supply and signed a contract on 17 June 1977 to sponsor recreational development in lieu of city of Macon. After review by the Office of the Secretary of the Army, the state signed the contract in December 1979 and it was approved by the Secretary of the Army on 18 April 1980. Operations and results during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1981 was 435,200 visitor days. Regular funds, new work: Contract for recreation facilities was awarded 28 October 1980 and has advanced to 75 percent complete. Contract for Interpretive Exhibits was awarded 6 February 1981 and has advanced to 75 percent complete. Design activities for remaining facilities continued. Maintenance: Activities consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance. Condition at end of fiscal year. All land has been acquired. Construction was initiated in March 1973. Project was placed in useful operation for flood control on 1 September 1980. Recreation facilities remain to be completed. Project is 76 percent complete. 14. MELVERN LAKE, MARAIS DES CYGNES (OSAGE) RIVER, KANS. Location. Damsite is on Marais des Cygnes (Osage) River in Osage County, Kansas, about 2 miles west of Melvern, Kansas. Existing project. An earthfill dam about 9,700 feet long and about 98 feet high with an uncontrolled chute-type spillway in left abutment. Total reservoir storage capacity is 363,000 acrefeet (200,000 for flood control, 26,000 for sediment reserve, and 137,000 of multipurpose storage for water quality control and recreation). Project is a unit of the Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin program for flood control and other purposes in Missouri River Basin, authorized by 1954 Flood Control Act, P.L. 780 (H. Doc. 549, 81st Cong., 2d sess.). Initial cost of constructing the completed project was $37,436,530. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. 20-6 KANSAS CITY, MO., DISTRICT Operations and results during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1981 was 1,068,900 visitor days. Maintenance: Activity consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance. Condition as of Sept. 30. Construction was initiated July 13, 1967 and the project was placed in operation in August 1972. 15. MILFORD LAKE, REPUBLICAN RIVER, KANS. Location. Damsite is on Republican River near village of Alida and about 8 miles downstream from Milford, Geary County, Kansas, and about 10 miles above confluence of Republican and Smoky Hill Rivers which form Kansas River near Junction City, Kansas. Existing project. An earthfill dam about 6,300 feet long and 125 feet high with an uncontrolled service-chute spillway in a saddle on right abutment. Total reservoir storage capacity is 1,160,000 acre-feet (700,000 for flood control, 160,000 for sediment reserve and 300,000 of multipurpose storage for water supply, water quality control, and recreation). Water supply storage is included in project at request of Governor of Kansas under provisions of Federal Water Supply Act of 1958. Project is a unit of the Pick- Sloan Missouri Basin program for flood control and other purposes in Missouri River Basin authorized by 1954 Flood Control Act, P.L. 83-780 (H. Doc. 642, 81st Cong., 2d sess.). Initial cost of constructing the completed project was $48,268,843. Total estimated Federal cost of project (1981), including $2,100,000 supplemental recreational development (Code 710), is $50,368,843. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. Local interests must make reimbursement of $13,467,000 for water supply storage in accordance with Water Supply Act of 1958. Utilization of storage has not been initiated. Reimbursement was initiated, at the option of the State, in September 1976. Operations and results during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1981 was 1,427,200 visitor days. Regular funds, new work: Supplemental recreational development included near completion of Curtis Creek shower building. Maintenance: Activities included continuation of seismic reevaluation, boundary marking, renovation of relief wells, and ordinary operation and maintenance. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of project began in July 1961 and was completed in June 1965. Construction of supplemental recreation facilities is underway. 16. MISSOURI RIVER LEVEE SYSTEM, IOWA, NEBR., KANS., AND MO. (RULO, NEBR., TO MOUTH) Location. On both banks of Missouri River from Sioux City, Iowa, about 760 miles to mouth near St. Louis, Missouri. Portion of project in Kansas City District extends from Rulo, Nebraska, 498 miles to mouth. Existing project. A series of levee units and appurtenant works along both sides of Missouri River from Sioux City, Iowa, to the mouth, for protection of agricultural lands and small communities against floods. Estimated Federal cost (1981) for the active portion through construction of the protection from Rulo, Nebraska to mouth is $249,600,000 and $28,900,000 for lands and damages to be borne by local interests. Remaining portion of project consists of units on which planning and construction are being delayed pending completion of restudy to assure that additional levee construction is economically justified. Cost estimate for deferred and inactive portion of project Rulo, Nebraska, to mouth is $298,082,500 (1964 price level except Unit L 15 which is 1975 price level) of which $274,098,000 is Federal cost for construction and $23,984,500 for lands and damages to be borne by local interests. (See table 20-C for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of 1936, applies. Fully complied with for all completed units and units under construction. Sponsor for Unit L 345-330 has optioned the major part of lands for rights-of-way. Because of anticipated changes as a result of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, the District advised the sponsor to suspend condemnation proceedings for remaining requirements pending development of an alternate plan. Operations and results during fiscal year. Regular funds, new work: Contracts for levee work and pipeline relocation for Unit L 246 were essentially completed. Planning on remaining active units continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of project was initiated in June 1948. Status of individual units of active portion of project at end of fiscal year is shown in table 20-F on Missouri River levee system. 17. ONAGA LAKE, VERMILLION CREEK, KANS. Location. The project is located on Vermillion Creek in Pottawatomie County, Kansas, about 35 miles northwest of Topeka, Kansas. Existing project. Preliminary plans provide for an earthfill dam about 8,600 feet long and about 90 feet high above valley floor with an uncon- 20-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 trolled service spillway. The total reservoir storage capacity will be 328,000 acre-feet (217,000 for flood control, 21,000 for sediment reserve, and 90,000 multipurpose storage for water supply and recreation). Project was authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act, P.L. 87-874 (S. Doc. 122, 87th Cong., 2d sess.). Estimated Federal cost of construction (1981) is $95,300,000. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. Reimbursement of $25,840,000 will be required by local interests for water supply storage in accordance with Water Supply Act of 1958. Operations and results during fiscal year. Regular funds, new work: Preconstruction planning continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Preconstruction planning is completed except for seismic investigation of the embankment foundation. 18. PERRY LAKE AREA (ROAD IMPROVEMENTS), KANS. Location. The road improvements are in three segments at different locations in Jefferson County, Kansas, around the Perry Lake area. Segment A extends from U. S. Highway 24 at Perry, Kansas, 2.5 miles north and west to the east end of the Perry damsite access road. Segment B extends from the north side of the Jefferson Point Park north and west about 5.5 miles to highway K-92 about 2 miles west of Ozawakie, Kansas. Segment C extends from K-92, about 2 miles east of Ozawkie, north about 8.1 miles to highway K-4, K-16, about 2 miles east of Valley Falls, Kansas. Total improvement length is about 16.1 miles. Existing project. All segments were improved to existing Kansas State Highway Commission secondary road standards. Additional rights-ofway required for this project were authorized to be acquired at Federal expense. Project was authorized by River Basin Monetary Authorization Act of 1971 (Public Law 92-222). Estimated Federal cost of construction (1981) is $5,350,000. Local cooperation. County will maintain roads after completion. Operations and results during fiscal year. Seeding and grading were completed this fiscal year and in FY 1982, final payment will be made. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was initiated in March 1977 and is 100 percent complete. 19. PERRY LAKE, DELAWARE RIVER, KANS. Location. Damsite is on Delaware River about 5 miles above mouth in Jefferson County, Kansas, and about 3 miles north of Perry, Kansas. Existing project. An earthfill dam about 7,750 feet long constructed to an elevation about 95 feet above valley floor with gated-outlet works and an uncontrolled spillway in left abutment. Total reservoir storage capacity is 770,000 acrefeet (480,000 for flood control, 140,000 for sediment reserve and 150,000 of multipurpose storage for water supply, water quality control, and recreation). Water supply storage is included in project plan at request of State of Kansas under provisions of Federal Water Supply Act of 1958. Project is a unit of the Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin program for flood control and other purposes in Missouri River Basin, authorized by 1954 Flood Control Act, P.L. 780 (H. Doc. 642, 81st Cong., 2d sess.). Initial cost of constructing the completed project was $48,371,706. Total Federal cost of project, including $1,000,000 (1981) supplemental recreational development (Code 710), is $49,371,706. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. Localtinterests must make reimbursement of $8,290,000 for water supply storage in accordance with Water Supply Act of 1958. Utilization of storage has not been initiated. Reimbursement was initiated at the option of the State in September 1978. Operations and results during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1981 was 1,423,400 visitor days. Regular funds, new work: Supplemental recreation development consisted of financial completion of the contract for water supply for several recreation areas. Maintenance: Activity included boundary monumentation and ordinary operation and maintenance. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was initiated in March 1964 and completed in January 1969. Deferred maintenance for the railroad relocation is complete. Future supplemental recreation facilities remain to be designed and constructed. 20. PICK-SLOAN MISSOURI BASIN PROGRAM (KANSAS CITY DIST.) Location. Flood control improvements included in this project are on and along the Missouri River and several of its principle tributaries, in States comprising the Missouri River Basin. Existing project. The Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin program for flood control and other purposes in Missouri River Basin provides for levees along Missouri River between Sioux City, Iowa, and the mouth, flood-protection works at certain municipalities, and reservoirs on main stem of 20-8 KANSAS CITY, MO., DISTRICT Missouri River and on tributaries for control of floodflows at damsite. (See table 20-C for authorizing legislation and table 20-G on Kansas City District projects included in Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin program.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Regular funds, new work: Operations for those project expenditures, on which plans were in preparation or construction was initiated, are shown in individual reports. Under sections 7 and 9, 1944 Flood Control Act, the Corps is responsible for detailed scheduling of operations of storage capacity reserved for or assigned to flood control in reservoirs constructed by Bureau of Reclamation as well as those constructed by the Corps. Maintenance: Consisted of scheduling of flood control reservoir operation. Condition at end of fiscal year. See individual reports. 21. POMME DE TERRE LAKE, POMME DE TERRE RIVER, MO. Location. Dam is on main stem of Pomme de Terre River, about 44 miles above mouth of stream in Hickory County, Missouri, lake extending upstream into Polk County, Missouri. Site is about 3 miles south of Hermitage, Missouri, and 20 miles north of Bolivar, Missouri. Existing project. An earth and rockfill dam about 4,630 feet long constructed to about 155 feet above riverbed and a dike section on left abutment about 2,790 feet long, impound floodwater within reservoir which provides storage capacity of 650,000 acre-feet (407,000 for flood control and 243,000 for sedimentation and multipurpose). Project is a unit of the Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin program for flood control and other purposes in Missouri River Basin, authorized by 1938 Flood Control Act, P.L. 761 (Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess.), as modified by Flood Control Acts of December 22, 1944, P.L. 534 and September 3, 1954, P.L. 780 (H. Doc. 475, and S. Docs. 191 and 247, 78th Cong., 2d sess. and H. Doc. 549, 81st Cong., 2d sess.). Initial cost of constructing the completed project was $14,946,784. Total estimated Federal cost of project (1981), including $329,140 area redevelopment and $3,800,000 supplemental recreational development (Code 710), is $19,075,924. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1981 was 1,402,100 visitor days. Regular funds, new work: Supplemental recreation facilities consisted of financial completion of Quarry Point shower building. Maintenance: Activities included boundary marking, and ordinary operation and maintenance. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was initiated in January 1957 and the project was placed in operation in October 1961. Future supplemental recreation facilities remain to be designed and constructed. 22. POMONA LAKE, ONE HUNDRED TEN MILE CREEK, KANS. Location. Dam is on One Hundred Ten Mile Creek, a tributary of Marais des Cygnes (Osage) River, 7 miles above mouth of stream in Osage County, Kansas, about 7 miles northwest of Pomona, Kansas, and 34 miles upstream from Ottawa, Kansas. Existing project. An earthfill dam 7,750 feet long constructed to an average height of about 85 feet above streambed, with gated-outlet works and an ungated chute-type spillway near left abutment. Total reservoir storage capacity is 230,000 acre-feet (160,000 for flood control, 14,000 for sediment reserve, and 56,000 of multipurpose storage for water quality control and recreation). This project is a unit of Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin program for flood control and other purposes in Missouri River Basin, authorized by 1954 Flood Control Act, P.L. 780 (H. Doc. 549, 81st Cong., 2d sess.). Initial cost of constructing the completed project was $13,272,108. Total estimated Federal cost of project (1981), including supplemental recreational development $1,890,000 (Code 710), is $15,162,108. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1981 was 565,400 visitor days. Maintenance: Activities consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in July 1959 and project was placed in operation in October 1963. Future supplemental recreation facilities remain to be designed and constructed. 23. RATHBUN LAKE, CHARITON RIVER, IOWA Location. Damsite is on Chariton River about 7 miles north of Centerville and 1 mile north of town of Rathbun, Appanoose County, Iowa. Existing project. An earthfill dam 10,600 feet long constructed to an elevation about 86 feet above valley floor, with gated-outlet works and an uncontrolled service chute with paved sill spillway about a mile upstream from left abutment. Total reservoir storage capacity is 552,000 20-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 acre feet (339,000 for flood control, 24,000 for sediment reserve and 189,000 of multipurpose storage for navigation, water quality control, and recreation). Project authorized by 1954 Flood Control Act, P.L. 780 (H. Doc. 561, 81st Cong., 2d sess.) . Initial cost of constructing the project was $27,033,210. Total estimated Federal cost of project (1981), including $2,440,000 supplemental recreation development (Code 710), is $29,473,210. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1981 was 1,017,700 visitor days. Maintenance: Activities included continuation of a cultural resource survey, resurfacing toe road, and ordinary operation and maintenance activities. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project was initiated in September 1964 and completed in November 1969. The operating plan for this project was revised to reduce flood control releases during critical times of the year to allow local farmers better access during planting and harvesting and to facilitate field drainage and drying out. The revised plan has resulted in more frequent high pool elevations than anticipated which has inundated roads and recreation facilities. A shoreline erosion study was accomplished and a supplement to the master plan recommending relocation of recreation facilities and bank stabilization affected by the higher lake levels has been approved. Future recreation facilities remain to be designed and constructed. 24. SMITHVILLE LAKE, LITTLE PLATTE RIVER, MO. Location. Damsite is on Little Platte River about 1 mile northeast of Smithville and about 5 miles north of Kansas City, in Clay and Clinton Counties, Missouri. Existing project. Plans provide for an earthfill dam about 4,200 feet long and 95 feet high with an uncontrolled service spillway. A dike about 2,000 feet long would be constructed across a saddle in left abutment. Total reservoir storage capacity would be 246,500 acre-feet (92,000 for flood control, 52,300 for sediment reserve, and 102,200 of multipurpose storage for water supply, water quality control, and recreation). Project was authorized by 1965 Flood Control Act, P.L. 89-298 (H. Doc. 262, 89th Cong., 1st sess.). Estimated Federal cost (1981) through construction of the project is $86,100,000. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938, applies. Reimbursement of $24,000,000 will be required for water supply storage in accordance with Water Supply Act of 1958 and reimbursement of $7,500,000 will be required for recreation development in accordance with Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Additional non-Federal contribution for recreation amounts to $600,000. All contracts for local cooperation were approved by the Secretary of the Army on 27 November 1972. Operations and results during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1981 was 1,413,400 visitor days. Regular funds, new work: Land acquisition, relocations and construction of project features continued. Maintenance: Activities consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was initiated in November 1973 and is 96 percent complete. 25. TUTTLE CREEK LAKE, BIG BLUE RIVER, KANS. Location. Dam is on main stem of Big Blue River, about 12 miles above mouth of stream in Riley and Pottawatomie Counties, Kansas. Site is about 12 miles northwest of Manhattan, Kansas. Existing project. A dam 7,500 feet long and 157 feet high. Project is unit of the Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin program for flood control and other purposes in Missouri River Basin authorized by 1938 Flood Control Act, P.L. 761 (Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess.), as modified by 1941 Flood Control Act, P.L. 228, and expanded by Flood Control Act of December 22, 1944, P.L. 534 (H. Doc. 475, and S. Docs. 191 and 247, 78th Cong., 2d sess.). Total reservoir storage capacity is 2,346,000 acre-feet (1,933,000 for flood control, 228,000 for sediment reserve and 185,000 for multipurpose storage, for low flow regulation, navigation, and recreation). Initial cost of constructing the completed project was $80,051,031. Total estimated Federal cost of project (1981), including $1,010,000 supplemental recreational development (Code 710), is $81,061,031. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1981 was 843,900 visitor days. Regular funds, new work: Supplemental recreation development consisted of design and award of contract for Outlet Area comfort station. Maintenance: Activity included seismic reevaluation, emergency gate repair, and ordinary operation and maintenance. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of project began in October 1952 and the project was placed in operation in July 1962. Construction of supplemental recreation facilities is underway. 20-10 KANSAS CITY, MO., DISTRICT 26. WILSON LAKE, SALINE RIVER, KANS. Location. Dam is on Saline River about 130 miles above its mouth, near eastern edge of Russell County, Kansas, about 50 miles west of Salina, 10 miles north of Wilson, and 20 miles east of Russell, Kansas. Existing project. An earthfill dam about 5,600 feet long and 160 feet high with a gated-outlet works, chute spillway, and structural provision for irrigation. Total reservoir storage capacity is 776,000 acre-feet (511,000 for flood control, 40,000 for sediment reserve and 225,000 multipurpose storage for irrigation, navigation, and low flow regulation). Project is a unit of the Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin program for flood control and other purposes in Missouri River Basin, authorized by 1944 Flood Control Act, P.L. 534 (H. Doc. 475, and S. Docs. 191 and 247, 78th Cong., 2d sess.). Report of Chief of Engineers on justification of Wilson Dam and Reservoir, submitted in compliance with Public Law 505, 84th Congress, published as Senate Document 96, 86th Congress, was approved July 14, 1960 (Public Law 645, 86th Cong.). Initial cost of constructing the project was $20,015,023. Total estimated Federal cost of project (1981), including $1,370,000 supplemental recreational development (Code 710), is $21,385,023. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1981 was 697,300 visitor days. Regular funds, new work: Supplemental recreation development consisted of design and award of contract for Otoe Park washhouse. Maintenance: Activity consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in April 1961, and project was placed in operation in December 1964. Construction of supplemental recreation facilities is underway. 27. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Flood Control Act of June 22, 1963, P.L. 738, and subsequent acts require local interests to furnish assurances that they will maintain and operate certain local protection projects after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army. District Engineers are responsible for administration of these regulations within boundaries of their respective district. (See table 20-H on inspection of completed flood control projects.) 28. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS All construction costs to date for other authorized flood control projects are shown in table 20-I. 29. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation). Federal costs for period October 1, 1980 thru September 30, 1981 were $199,174 for disaster preparedness and $688,763 for rehabilitation. Emergency Bank Protection (Sec. 14, 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Cong., July 24, 1946) as amended. Operations during this period under this heading were as follows: West Fork, Grand River, Missouri-Construction was completed on an authorized project to provide protection for a county bridge in Gentry County, Missouri. Costs for the period were $4,959. 102 River, Pickering, Missouri-Construction was completed on an authorized project to provide protection for a county bridge in Nodaway County, Missouri. Costs for the period were $2,000. Nemaha River, Elk Creek, Nebraska-Construction was essentially completed on a project to provide protection for sewage lagoons in Johnson County, Nebraska near the village of Elk Creek. Costs for the period were $11,241. Little Blue River, Waterville, Kansas-Construction was completed on a project to provide protection for a county road in Marshall County, Kansas near Waterville. Costs for the period were $53,000. Chariton River, Appanoose County, Iowa- Construction was initiated on a project to provide protection for a county road in Appanoose County, Iowa. Costs for the period were $1,090. To complete final payments, $487 was expended on 102 River Missouri; $917 on Nodaway River, Missouri; and $386 on Platte River, Missouri. Snagging and Clearing (Sec. 208, 1954 Flood Control Act, Public Law 780, 83d Cong.) 3 September 1954, as amended. No operations during this period. Small Flood Control Projects Not Specifically Authorized by Congress (Sec. 205, 1948 Flood Control Act, Public Law 858, 80th Cong., June 30, 1948) as amended. See detailed report for operation at Gypsum, Kansas. $2,996 was expended during the year to complete the Section 205 portion of the Bedford Lake, Iowa, project. 20-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 Multiple Purpose Projects Including Power 30. HARRY S. TRUMAN DAM AND RESERVOIR, OSAGE RIVER, MO. Location. Damsite is on main stem of Osage River about 1.5 miles northwest of Warsaw, Benton County, Missouri. Reservoir extends into Bates, Henry, Hickory, St. Clair, and Vernon Counties, Missouri. Existing project. An earthfill dam about 5,000 feet long constructed to an average height of about 96 feet, including a gate-controlled overfall spillway section and a power installation consisting of six inclined pump-generating units with total capacity of 160,000 kilowatts. Total reservoir storage capacity is 5,202,000 acre-feet (3,918,000 for flood control, 244,000 for sediment reserve, and 1,040,000 multipurpose storage for power, low-flow regulation, and recreation). This project is a unit of the Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin program for flood control and other purposes in Missouri River basin. Project was authorized by 1954 Flood Control Act, P.L. 780 (H. Doc. 549, 81st Cong., 2d sess.), as modified by 1962 Flood Control Act, P.L. 87-874 (H. Doc. 578, 87th Cong., 2d sess.). Public Law 91-267, approved May 26, 1970, authorized a change in project name from Kaysinger Bluff Dam and Reservoir, Osage River Basin, Missouri to the Harry S. Truman Dam and Reservoir. Estimated cost through construction of the project (1981) is $543 million. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1981 was 1,075,700 visitor days. Regular funds, new work: Acquisition of land and rights-of-way; relocation of roads, railroads, cemeteries, utilities and municipal facilities; boundary surveying and marking; construction of the dam and powerplant; and construction of public use facilities were continued. Maintenance: Activities consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of relocation of Missouri Highway M-13 was initiated September 1964 and completed May 1966. Construction of the dam and reservoir was initiated in October 1964 and the entire project is 87 percent complete. The embankment has been completed including paving the top of the dam roadway. The spillway was completed in October 1979. The Southwestern Power Admimistration powerline needed for final testing and commercial operation of the generators was completed in December 1979. The first power unit was placed on line on 22 December 1979. Subsequent problems with the turbine bearing has necessitated remedial design on the bearing. Commercial power production is now expected to begin in 1982. Work remaining to be constructed includes measures to protect downstream areas from power operation. 31. STOCKTON LAKE, SAC RIVER, MO. Location. Damsite is on Sac River about 49.5 miles above its confluence with Osage River, and about 2 miles east of Stockton, Cedar County, Missouri, lake extending into Dade and Polk Counties. Existing project. A rock-shell dam with impervious core about 5,100 feet long constructed to an average height of about 128 feet, with a gated overfall spillway and a 45,200-kilowatt power installation. Total reservoir storage capacity is 1,674,000 acre-feet (774,000 for flood control, 25,000 for sediment reserve and 875,000 multipurpose storage for power and recreation). Project is a unit of Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin program for flood control and other purposes in Missouri River Basin, authorized by 1954 Flood Control Act, P.L. 780 (H. Doc. 549, 81st Cong., 2d sess.). Initial cost of constructing the completed project was $75,628,300. Estimated cost through construction of the project, including $3,671,700 for downstream channel work and $2,340,000 for supplemental recreational development (Code 710), is $81,640,000 (1981). Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1981 was 1,811,100 visitor days. Regular funds, new work: The project is complete and in operational status. No construction work is underway. Resumption is dependent upon resolution of downstream capacity problem. The net amount of power marketed with Southwestern Power Administration was 6,516,200 kilowatts. Maintenance: Activities consisted of boundary marking and ordinary operation and maintenance. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was initiated in October 1963 and the project was placed in operation in December 1969. Power operation problems were encountered with the initial operation in March 1973 because the downstream channel did not have the capacity which earlier observations and computations indicated. As a result, it has been necessary to restrict the power operation to about the 30,000 kilowatt level pending resolution of the downstream capacity problem. Remaining work consists of a proposed solution to protect downstream areas from power operation. This plan consists of proposal to acquire flowage easements on land and to construct a channel 20-12 KANSAS CITY, MO., DISTRICT cutoff at Horseshoe Bend downstream from the dam to assure downstream channel capacity of 8,000 c.f.s. for powerplant operation. On 22 March 1978, the state of Missouri and ten landowners on the Sac River filed suit in United States District Court seeking to enjoin the Corps from implementing the proposed solution. On 29 March 1978, the Court denied plaintiffs' motion for a temporary restraining order and the Corps agreed that it would not acquire any easements pending the Court's decision on the merits of the case. A trial was held 14 April 1980. Judgement was rendered in favor of the Corps on 24 December 1980. On 17 and 20 February 1981 the plaintiffs filed notices of appeal to the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals. The project plan will be implemented when funds are available. General Investigations 32. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs were $1,089,862 for flood damage prevention studies, $135,538 for review of authorized projects, $60,387 for coordination studies with other agencies, and $418 for Phase I AE & D (Wears Creek, Mo.). 33. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA (Inspection of Dams) National Dam Safety Program Inspection of Dams-During FY 1981, 25 non- Federal dams were inspected in the state of Kansas assigned to the Kansas City District. The cost for FY 1981 was $301,715. Inventory of Dams-The dam inventory program was essentially completed during FY80. Updating during FY81 consisted of changes in inspection status of dams which were inspected during FY81. The total cost during FY81 for this work was $44,342. There are 5,031 dams in the state of Kansas which meet the size criteria to be included in this program. (Flood Plain Management Services) Flood Hazard Information Reports A special flood hazard information report was underway for the Missouri River from its mouth to Rulo, Nebraska at a cost of $16,375. Flood Plain Management Services Unit cost was $109,949. Technical Services. The Flood Plain Reports section provided site investigations and flood hazard evaluations to military and non-military Federal agencies, State and local governmental agencies, and to individuals and businesses comprising over 535 separate inquiries. Costs were $100,460 during FY 1981. Flood Plain Management Planning assistance was provided to Kansas City, Missouri; Jackson County, Missouri; Olathe, Kansas; Leavenworth, Kansas and Leavenworth County, Kansas at a cost of $50,524. Hydrologic Studies. Costs for hydrologic studies for the fiscal year were $31,116. 20-13 TABLE 20-A See Section in Text Project 1. Missouri River, Sioux City, Iowa to Mouth (Rulo, Nebr., to Mouth) (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) (Consolidated Summary) Blue River Channel Kansas City, Mo. 4. Clinton Lake, Wakarusa River, Kans. (Contributed Funds) (Consolidated Summary) 5. Gypsum, Gypsum Creek, Kans. (Contributed Funds) (Consolidated Summary) 6. Harlan County Lake, Republican River, Nebr. 7. Hillsdale Lake, Big Bull Creek, Kans. 8. Kanopolis Lake, Smoky Hill River, Kans. 9. Kansas City, Kansas River, Kans. (62 Mod.) REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Funding New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Total Cost to FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 Sept. 30, 1981 3,030,000 2,084,903 4,109,300 5,223,213 3,030,000 2,084,902 4,109,300 5,223,213 57,000 132,676 5,400,000 4,895,292 1,139 5,400,000 4,896,431 1,181,000 47,047 1,181,000 47,047 975,000 976,677 867,000 1,117,294 8,400,000 8,386,752 75 483,000 500,545 4,300,000 5,337,893. 2,350,000 3,538,664 4,641,0009 5,223,8009 2,350,000 3,538,646 4,641,0009 5,223,8009 500,000 437,637 2,350,000 3,945,287 336,700 333,194 -243 2,349,757 3,945,287 746,000 1,452,959 130,841 876,841 1,452,959 286,742 42,756 845,1009 847,3319 12,800,000 13,353,283 570,3009 612,0279 700,000 1,589,682 1,348,000 1,909,672 5,841,500 5,897,687 1,348,000 1,909,672 5,841,500 5,897,687 695,000 710,532 923,033 1,916,752 574,500 574,381 923,033 1,916,752 310,000 678,681 125,574 310,000 804,255 15,984 274,019 876,000 849,000 12,550,000 13,339,102 548,000 538,020 78,000 438,092 1,334 6,401,400 6,401,102 32,253 33,587 6,401,400 6,401,102 839,000 882,756 773,000 758,487 853,700 854,482 773,000 758,587 -54,000 67,801 -10,835 -54,000 56,966 900 10,174 1,431,300 1,376,607 7,891,000 6,850,206 39,000 38,996 732,200 730,683 90,000 26,056 20-14 237,942,1901 237,942,1901 240,434,7142, 9 240,406,0932, 9 816,190 816,190 22,642 22,642 238,758,3803 238,758,3803 240,457,3564 9 240,428,735 9 3,445,171 3,437,618 55,893,533 55,853,683 1,764,900 1,762,057 118,805 118,805 56,012,338 55,972,488 2,585,952 2,585,608 130,841 114,739 2,716,793 2,700,347 46,971,9265 46,971,926 11,044,5619 10,950,4689 1,017,623 1,017,623 58,726,800 57,597,723 12,577,2276 12,577,2236 7,281,0109 7,262,4459 25,036,600 24,936,277 KANSAS CITY, MO., DISTRICT TABLE 20-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Project 10. Lawrence, Kansas River, Kans. (Contributed Funds) (Consolidated Summary) 11. Little Blue River Channel Improvement, Little Blue River, Mo. 12. Little Blue River Lakes, Little Blue River, Mo. (Contributed Funds) (Consolidated Summary) 13. Long Branch Lake Little Chariton River, Mo. (Contributed Funds) (Consolidated Summary) 14. Melvern Lake, Osage (Marais des Cygnes) River, Kans. 15. Milford Lake, Republican River, Kans. 16. Missouri River Levee System, Iowa, Nebr., Kans., and Mo. 17. Onaga Lake, Kans. 18. Perry Lake Area (Road Improvements), Kans. 19. Perry Lake, Delaware River, Kans. 20. Pick-Sloan Mo. Basin Program - Total Cost to Funding FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 Sept. 30, 1981 New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 186,000 555,819 29,800 186,000 585,619 2,750,000 2,513,650 3,000,000 2,037,978 3,000,000 2,037,978 1,500,000 1,143,111 1,500,000 1,143,111 15,000 111,093 692,000 703,970 110,823 127,361 871,700 871,000 2,012,000 2,540,510 125,000 39,419 1,962,000 2,148,231 319,967 184,435 895,000 978,515 165,000 166,260 135,000 101,847 37,415 11,722 172,415 113,569 2,429,967 3,341,757 105,000 160,732 20,010 35,988 125,010 196,720 1,522,000 1,647,911 11,557,000 18,280,000 10,893,293 17,972,213 -23,312 37,795 -23,312 37,795 1,650,000 2,579,074 1,436,000 4,542,070 295,000 1,731,000 4,542,070 700,000 1,095,914 122,900 122,359 700,000 1,095,914 42,000 38 782,2009 742,1719 566,000 466,861 869,3009 985,9179 3,812,570 5,332,041 94,452 1,038,000 1,429,652 -10,688 386,995 992,8009 999,9989 150,000 148,070 35,000 18,280,000 18,007,213 -100,000 490,325 317,100 314,949 197,874 128,311 97,874 618,636 500 825,000 822,987 -111,900 278,876 1,473,300 1,488,610 1,747,000 1,873,014 181,547 --40,000 -33,350 -11,000 4,508 1,502,500 1,415,974 145,000 145,514 8,616,988 8,574,101 136,616 126,560 8,753,604 8,700,661 16,966,083 16,848,543 59,765,200 58,667,686 295,000 260,000 60,060,200 58,927,686 17,060,577 16,946,142 695,500 690,942 518,888 449,325 17,579,465 17,395,467 37,436,530 37,436,530 5,374,2609 5,358,2239 49,525,492 49,511,678 9,211,3249 9,185,7879 54,618,851 54,050,840 2,170,261 2,168,611 5,348,168 5,345,737 49,121,918 49,120,258 8,925,9849 8,826,9859 55,5697 55,5697 4,171,6238 4,168,5368 20-15 225,000 11,557,000 11,118,293 -158,000 -141,460 255,500 253,633 321,014 321,014 163,014 179,554 -24,280 26,019 682,500 676,941 311,000 89,926 1,329,000 1,302,600 4,552,000 3,907,735 275,000 108,564 -16,000 114,473 75,408 944,000 938,548 140,500 142,302 SSeeection REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 20-A (Continued) See Section in Text Project 21. Pomme de Terre Lake, Pomme de Terre River, Mo. 22. Pomona Lake, One Hundred Ten Mile Creek, Kans. 23. Rathbun Lake, Chariton River, Iowa 24. Smithville Lake, Little Platte River, Mo. 25. Tuttle Creek Lake, Big Blue River, Kans. 26. Wilson Lake, Saline River, Kans. 27. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects 30. Harry S.Truman Dam & Reservoir Osage River, Mo. 31. Stockton Lake, Sac River, Mo. COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT I Total Cost to Funding FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 Sept. 30, 1981 New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 92,205 706,000 744,219 7,000 27,332 691,000 748,943 -1,968 802,000 784,210 7,600,000 8,828,700 785,000 724,767 4,000 495,000 526,553 226,300 245,866 48,767,000 51,855,034 63,177 318,543 1,121,000 1,132,400 415,000 227,092 1,008,7009 1,038,5829 59,571 798,9009 854,0559, 10 883,5009 994,0179 8,850,000 15,337,162 208,800 208,282 838,3009 937,1319 -1,622 2,378 686,5009 694,7019 210,600 212,033 38,000,000 52,666,915 681,900 678,919 1,757,880 1,052,292 1,422,3009 1,478,7039 -13,000 190,195 1,125,000 1.121,864 -2,984 705,000 705,797 830,000 811,000 8,965,000 9,649,068 361,000 359,141 862,500 815,593 553,500 555,558 228,500 228,456 34,048,000 34,374,314 1,785,500 1,761,331 --960,000 50,990 1,478,500 1,478,509 1,000 9,045 1,271,200 1,275,130 1,000 1,000 895,700 886,503 1,119,900 1,064,023 3,580,000 3,356,263 426,000 425,787 220,000 52,215 774,300 826,742 381,000 97,922 672,500 658,408 308,000 308,158 28,970,000 28,625,025 2,587,800 2,571,700 432,000 55,878 1,825,100 1,768,669 1. Includes $8,665,594 costs of new work for previous project. 2. Includes $738,109 for maintenance of previous project. 3. Includes $8,665,594 for new work for previous project and $816,190 from contributed funds. 4. Includes $738,190 for maintenance of previous project $22,642 from contributed funds and $200,000 Fiscal Year 1968 Supplemental Appropriation Funds. 5. Excludes cost of materials furnished without charge in the amount of $24,198. 6. Excludes cost of materials furnished without charge in the amount of $7,885. 7. Covers 96X3122 construction, general, funds allotted to the 'Republican River Basin Reservoirs (Medicine Creek Reservoir), Colo., Nebraska, and Kansas.' 8. Covers 96X3123 operation and maintenance, general, funds allotted to 'Scheduling of Flood Control Reservoir Operations.' 9. Includes funds from Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters appropriation. 10. Reflects $10 expenditure of undelivered order after close of 1978 cost records. 11. Includes $619,787 non-Federal contributions for work desired by local interests, but not required under the project. 20-16 17,296,035 17,296,035 9,492,8129 9,488,6199 13,998,238 13,998,238 7,805,8339 7,789,2149, 10 27,127,159 27,127,159 7,294,3189 7,216,0419 83,137,438 82,629,044 995,800 993,210 80,597,468 80,429,683 9,474,7799 9,455,1329 20,490,395 20,207,317 6,257,6469 6,239,8589 2,398,975 2,398,805 470,441,900 468,924,575 5,055,200 5,011,950 77,002,357 76,613,819 11,500,5009 11,426,4179 KANSAS CITY, MO., DISTRICT MISSOURI RIVER, SIOUX CITY IOWA, TO MOUTH (RULO, NEBR., TO MOUTH) TABLE 20-B TOTAL COST OF EXISTING PROJECT TO SEPTEMBER 30, 1981 (See Section 1 of Text) Funds New Work Maintenance Total Regular $209,732,851 $238,168,642 $447,901,493 Emergency 2,362,599 190,401 2,553,000 Public works 17,181,146 114,180 17,295,326 Accelerated public works - 393,261 393,261 Maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters 801,500 801,500 Total $229,276,596 $239,667,984 $468,944,580 TABLE 20-C AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents MISSOURI RIVER, SIOUX CITY, IOWA TO MOUTH (RULO, NEBR., TO MOUTH) (See Section 1 of Text) Project adopted for securing a permanent navigable channel of 6-foot depth from Kansas City, Mo. to mouth. Fixed upstream limit of improvement at upper end of Quindaro Bend (374.8 miles from mouth) and provided for dredging. For a minimum width of 200 feet, with a reasonable additional width around bends. Appropriation of $12 million authorized for existing project. Appropriation of $15 million additional authorized; additional allotments totaling $29,153,108 were made by Public Works Administration under provisions of National Industrial Recovery Act of 1938, and $9,669,791 allotted under provisions of Emergency Relief Appropriation Act of 1935. Completion of improvement from mouth to Sioux City, Iowa. Securing a navigable channel of 9-foot depth and a minimum width of 300 feet. BLUE RIVER BASIN (KANSAS CITY DISTRICT) Adopted plan for Blue River Basin and authorized $40,000,000 for initiation and partial accomplishment. KANSAS CITYS ON MISSOURI AND KANSAS RIVERS, MO. AND KANS. Levees and floodwalls for protection of Kansas Citys, at an estimated construction cost not to exceed $10 million, estimated cost of lands and damages $8 million. Modified and extended project to provide construction of cutoffs and protection for additional areas at an estimated additional cost of $8,445,000. H. Doc. 1287, 61st Cong., 3d sess. (contains latest published map). P.L. 241-62 H. Doc. 463, 64th Cong., 1st sess. (contains latest published map). P.L. 585-68 H. Doc. 1120, 60th Cong., 2d sess. P.L. 560-70. H. Doc. 238, 73d Cong., 2d sess. (contains latest published map). H. Doc. 214, 76th Cong., 1st sess. (contains latest published map) P.L. 14-79. H. Doc. 91-332, 91st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 195, 73d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 342, 78th Cong., 1st sess. 20-17 July 25, 1912 Aug. 8, 1917 Mar. 3, 1925 Jan. 12, 1927 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 Dec. 31, 1970 June 22, 1936 Dec. 22, 1944 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 20-C (Cont'd) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents July 24, 1946 Sept. 3, 1954 Aug. 18, 1941 Dec. 22, 1944 Authorized Chief of Engineers to include necessary railroad bridge and approach alterations as a Federal responsibility. Alternate plan of improvement proposed by local interests for Armourdale unit (downstream section). MISSOURI RIVER LEVEE SYSTEM, IOWA, NEBR., KANS., AND MO. (See Section 16 of Text) Levees along both sides of river from Sioux City to Kansas City. Extended project from Kansas City to the mouth provided for increased protection. PICK-SLOAN MISSOURI BASIN PROGRAM (KANSAS CITY DIST.) (See Section 20 of Text) Adopted general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $9 million for initiation and partial accomplishment. Modified general comprehensive plan to include Harlan County Dam and Reservoir on Republican River, Nebr., other supplemental flood control works on upper Republican River, and authorized $7 million additional expenditure. Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $200 million additional expenditure. Additional expenditure of $150 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Additional expenditure of $250 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $217,710,000 additional expenditure. Modified general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin by deletion of construction of Red Willow Dam and Reservoir, Nebr., and addition of construction of Wilson Dam and Reservoir, Kans. Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $200 million additional expenditure. Additional expenditure of $207 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Additional expenditure of $80 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and modified plan to include bank protection or rectification works below Garrison Dam. Additional $116 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Additional $20 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Additional $38,000,000 for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Change comprehensive plan name to Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin program. Additional $101,000,000 for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin program. Additional $72,000,000 for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin program. 1. Contains latest published maps of Missouri River. 20-18 H. Doc. 821, 76th Cong., 3d sess. H. Doc. 475 and S. Docs. 191 and 347, 78th Cong., 2d sess. Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 842, 76th Cong., 3d sess. H. Doc. 475 and S. Does. 191 and 247, 78th Cong., 2d sess. H. Docs. 642 and 5491 81st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 409, 84th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 91-1100, 91st Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 92-222, 92nd Cong., 1st sess. June 28, 1938 Aug. 18, 1941 Dec. 22, 1944 July 24, 1946 May 17, 1950 Sept. 3, 1954 May 2, 1956 July 3, 1958 July 14, 1960 Dec. 30, 1963 June 18, 1965 May 12, 1967 Aug. 13, 1968 Dec. 24, 1970 Dec. 23, 1971 Mar. 7, 1974 KANSAS CITY, MO., DISTRICT TABLE 20-D MISSOURI RIVER SIOUX CITY TO MOUTH: TERMINAL FACILITIES (See Section 1 of Text) Miles Description of Facility 1 Above Bank Nearest Town Mouth2 Existing facilities: Grain loading dock Rock loading dock Ramp, gas, and restaurant (fee) Sand and gravel unloading dock Grain loading dock Grain and vegetable oil loading dock Chemical unloading Grain unloading Rock loading dock Fertilizer unloading dock Grain loading dock Loading dock Transfer of materials dock Grain loading dock Rock loading dock Municipal Dock Fertilizer unloading and grain loading dock Shipyard and dry dock Grain loading dock Molasses unloading dock Material transfer and rock loading dock Sand and gravel unloading dock Loading and unloading dock Grain loading dock Fertilizer unloading dock Grain loading dock Loading and unloading dock Loading and unloading dock Loading and unloading dock Scrap steel loading dock Sand and gravel unloading dock Excursion dock Grain loading dock Grain loading dock Grain loading dock Chemical loading and unloading dock Coke loading and unloading dock Haydite loading dock Sand and gravel unloading dock Steel unloading dock Oil unloading dock and barge refueling Fertilizer unloading dock Cement loading dock Rock loading dock Rock loading dock Dock Rock loading dock Grain loading dock Sand and gravel loading dock Sand and gravel loading dock Grain loading dock Grain loading dock Sand and gravel unloading dock Rock loading dock Grain loading dock Chemicals, dry bulk, salt, molasses, fertilizer, coal and steel Rock loading dock Rock loading dock Grain loading dock Sand and gravel unloading dock Rock loading dock Rock loading dock Rock loading dock Sand, gravel & fertilizer unloading dock Fertilizer, salt & molasses unloading and grain loading dock Sand and gravel unloading dock Sand and gravel unloading dock 488.0 478.0 452.0 447.6 446.6 446.0 445.4 444.4 432.8 423.2 423.1 422.9 421.1 420.9 413.6 396.1 396.0 395.7 386.5 386.4 385.0 378.3 375.6 373.0 368.2 367.7 367.7 367.1 367.1 366.9 365.8 365.6 364.2 361.6 361.0 360.6 360.4 360.1 360.05 357.6 356.7 355.8 354.8 350.3 345.7 345.3 333.5 318.2 317.9 317.1 293.3 293.0 286.9 263.2 262.7 256.4 245.2 245.1 226.4 226.2 219.1 216.0 207.0 197.0 196.4 }86.3 181.6 Right Right Left Left Left Left Left Left Right Right Right Right Right Right Right Right Right Right Right Right Left Left Left Right Right Right Right Right Right Right Right Right Right Left Left Left Left Left Left Right Right Right Right Right Left Left Left Right Right Left Right Right Left Right Right Left Right Right Left Left Left Right Right Right Left Left Left White Cloud, KS White Cloud, KS St. Joseph, MO St. Joseph, MO St. Joseph, MO St. Joseph, MO St. Joseph, MO St. Joseph, MO St. Joseph, MO Atchison, KS Atchison, KS Atchison, KS Atchison, KS Atchison, KS Oak Mills, KS Leavenworth, KS Leavenworth, KS S. Leavenworth, KS Wolcott, KS Wolcott, KS Waldron, MO Parkville, MO Parkville, MO Kansas City, KS Kansas City, KS Kansas City, KS Kansas City, KS Kansas City, MO Kansas City, MO Kansas City, MO Kansas City, MO Kansas City, MO Kansas City, MO Kansas City, MO Randolph, MO Randolph, MO Randolph, MO Randolph, MO Randolph, MO Sugar Creek, MO Sugar Creek, MO Sugar Creek, MO Sugar Creek, MO Sugar Creek, MO Missouri City, MO Missouri City, MO Sibley, MO Lexington, MO Lexington, MO Lexington, MO Waverly, MO Waverly, MO Carrollton, MO Miami, MO Miami, MO Brunswick, MO New Franklin, MO New Franklin, MO Glasgow, MO Glasgow, MO Glasgow, MO Arrow Rock, MO Arrow Rock, MO Boonville, MO Boonville, MO Rocheport, MO Huntsdale, MO 20-19 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 20-D (Cont'd) MISSOURI RIVER SIOUX CITY TO MOUTH: TERMINAL FACILITIES (See Section 1 of Text) Miles Description of Facility' Above Bank Nearest Town Mouth 2 Rock loading dock 177.2 Right Lupus, MO Rock loading dock 157.5 Right Marion, MO Oil unloading dock 148.7 Left Jefferson City, MO Sand and gravel unloading dock 143.7 Left Jefferson City, MO Sand and gravel unloading dock, cement 143.2 Left Jefferson City, MO Sand and gravel unloading dock 124.5 Left Mokane, MO Coal unloading dock 117.1 Right Chamois, MO Barge dock 115.5 Left Portland, MO Rock loading dock 109.7 Left Portland, MO Sand and gravel unloading dock 96.9 Left Hermann, MO Rock loading dock 85.3 Left New Haven, MO Unloading dock 81.7 Right New Haven, MO Sand and gravel unloading dock 68.1 Right Washington, MO Rock loading dock 56.2 Left Augusta, MO Rock loading dock 47.4 Left Monarch, MO Sand and gravel unloading dock 43.9 Right Chesterfield, MO Rock loading dock & sand and gravel unloading dock 31.3 Left St. Charles, MO Sand and gravel unloading dock 28.1 Right St. Charles, MO Sand and gravel unloading dock 27.9 Right St. Charles, MO Rock loading dock and gravel unloading dock 16.7 Right Musicks Ferry, MO Rock loading dock & sand and gravel unloading dock 8.4 Right Ruegg, MO 1. Privately owned and operated unless indicated. 2. 1960 adjusted mileage. TABLE 20-E OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Section 2 of Text) For Last Cost To September 30, 1981 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Fort Leavenworth Bridge removal 1965 270,393 - Gasconade River, Mo. . 2 1931 139,003 85,077 Osage River, Mo., lock and dam3 1952 658,076 850,495 1. Improvement adequate for existing needs. Project for maintenance only. 2. Curtailment of project in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st sess. 3. Operation of lock and dam placed in standby status. 20-20 KANSAS CITY, MO., DISTRICT TABLE 20-F MISSOURI RIVER LEVEE SYSTEM (See Section 16 of Text) Miles of Unit Levee Status R 513-512 Richardson Co. D. D. #7 19.1 Complete-1958 R 500 Iowa Point D. D. #4 4.1 Complete-1954 Kimsey Holly Creek 4.4 Complete-1970 L 497 Forest City L. D. 16.0 Complete-1962 L 488 Holt Co. D. D. #7 11.5 Complete-1955 R 482 Burr Oak D. D. #3 8.2 Complete-1954 L 476 Amazonia L. D. 10.8 Complete-1956 R 471-460 Elwood-Gladden L. D. 13.8 Complete-1968 L 455 S. St. Joseph L. D. 15.6 Complete-1967 L 448-443 Halls L. D. 17.3 Complete-1957 R 440 Atchison & Doniphan Co. D. D. 10.7 Complete-1959 L 408 Farley-Beverly D. D. 12.2 Complete (Levee raise modification)-1972 L 400 Waldron L. D. 7.6 Complete-1957 L 385 Riverside-Quindaro D. D. 6.5 Planning underway R 351 Atherton L. D. 15.9 Complete-1966 L 345-330 Orrick L. D. 43.4 Planning underway L 325-319 Henrietta-Crooked River D. D. 35.0 Planning underway L 246 Brunswick-Dalton D. D. 20.0 Under construction Remaining units Detailed planning not initiated TABLE 20-G KANSAS CITY DISTRICT PROJECTS INCLUDED IN PICK-SLOAN MISSOURI BASIN PROGRAM (See Section 20 of Text) Estimated Estimated Project Federal Non-Federal Cost Cost Abilene, Smoky Hill River, Kansas $ 1,099,350 $ 287,000 Bartley, Republican River, Nebraska 118,269 9,500 Fort Scott Lake, Marmaton River, Kansas 78,500,000 2,616,000 Garnett Lake, Pottawatomie Creek, Kansas2 38,600,000 - Harlan County Lake, Republican River, Nebraska 51,497,155 - Harry S. Truman Dam and Reservoir, Osage River, Missouri 532,000,000 117,126,000 Hillsdale Lake, Big Bull Creek, Kansas 61,000,000 20,260,000 Indianola, Republican River, Nebraska 67,275 7,592 Kanopolis Lake, Smoky Hill River, Kansas 13,257,735 - Lawrence, Kansas River, Kansas4 8,870,000 2,130,000 Manhattan, Kansas River, Kansas 2,488,585 265,000 Melvern Lake, Osage (Marais des Cygnes) River, Kansas 37,436,530 - Melvern Lake and Pomona Lake (Road Improvement), Kansas (1974 Authorization) 500,000 214,300 Milford Lake, Republican River, Kansas 50,368,843 - Missouri River Levee System, Rulo to the Mouth1 158,900,000 17,100,000 Osawatomie, Osage (Marais des Cygnes) River, Kansas 2,036,624 348,300 Ottawa, Osage (Marais des Cygnes) River, Kansas 4,462,661 876,000 Perry Lake, Delaware River, Kansas 49,371,706 - Pomme de Terre Lake, Pomme de Terre River, Missouri3 19,075,924 - Pomona Lake, Osage River Basin, Kansas 15,162,108 - Salina, Smoky Hill River, Kansas 3,878,668 1,960,000 Stockton Lake, Sac River, Missouri 81,240,000 17,391,000 Topeka, Kansas River, Kansas 21,174,593 10,383,492 Tuttle Creek Lake, Big Blue River, Kansas 81,061,031 - Tuttle Creek Lake, Kansas-Road and Bridge (1976 Act) 630,000 310,000 Tuttle Creek Lake (Road Improvement), Kansas (1974 Modification) 500,000 214,300 Wilson Lake, Saline River, Kansas 21,385,023 - 1. Active portion of project. Deferred portion of project is currently estimated to cost (1964) $1,690,000 Federal and $122,000 non-Federal. Inactive portion of project is currently estimated to cost (1964) $272,408,000 Federal and $23,862,500 non-Federal. 2. 1969 Estimate. 3. Active portion of project. Inactive portion of the project for power modification is currently estimated to cost (1954) $7,300,000. 4. 1976 estimate. 20-21 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 20-H INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 27 of Text) Location Month Inspected Missouri River Main Stem Missouri River Levees: R 513-512, R 500, Kimsey Holly Creek, L 497, L 488, Mar 1981 R 482, L 476, R 471-460, L 455, L 448-443, R 440, L 408, L 400 and R 351 Kansas Citys, Missouri and Kansas: Argentine, Armourdale, Sept 1981 Birmingham, CID (Mo & Kans), East Bottoms, Fairfax-Jersey Creek, North Kansas City Units, and GSA Federal Complex Osage River, Kansas and Missouri Ottawa, Kansas Sept 1981 Osawatomie, Kansas Sept 1981 Kansas River and Minor Tributaries Topeka, Kansas; Auburndale, North Topeka, Oakland, Soldier Sept 1981 Creek, South Topeka, and Waterworks Units Republican River, Nebraska and Kansas Bartley, Nebraska Sept 1981 Smoky Hill, Saline, and Solomon Rivers Abilene, Kansas Sept 1981 20-22 KANSAS CITY, MO., DISTRICT TABLE 20-I OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 28 of Text) For Last Cost To September 30, 1981 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Abilene, Kans.' 1965 1,099,350 - Arlington Lake, Mo.5 1948 8,651 - Atchison, Kans.' 1973 4,099,590 - Barnard, Kans.' 4 - 127,860 - Bartley, Nebr.' 1953 118,269 - Beatrice, Big Blue River, Nebr.5 1965 16,317 - Bedford, East Fork, 102 River, Iowa" 4 1974 652,414 - Big Blue River, Seward, Nebr. 4- 126,887 - Big Stranger Creek, Kans. ', 4 337,131 Braymer Lake, Shoal Creek, Mo.2 1966 - - Brookfield Lke, Yellow Creek, Mo.2 1976 451,400 - Chariton-Little Chariton Basin, Mo. (1965 Act) 1977 692,7066 - Chariton River, Mo. (1944 Act)' 1973 8,052,990 - Dry Fork and East Fork Lakes, Fishing River, Mo.3 1974 51,989 - East Muddy Creek, Mo.2 1966 - - Elk Creek, Clyde, Kans.' 1975 881,415 - Fairbury, Little Blue River, Nebr.' 1973 726,966 - Fort Scott Lake, Marmaton River, Kans.3 1976 757,500 - Frankfort, Black Vermillion River, Kans.' 1966 1,271,025 - Garnett Lake, Pottawatomie Creek, Kans.2 1973 71,466 - Grove Lake, Soldier Creek, Kans.2 1977 1,754,019 - Hackleman Corners Lake, Cedar Creek, Mo.5 - - - Hays, Big Creek, Kans.5 1974 499,200 - Indian Lake, Blue River, Kans.2 1976 127,297 - Indianola, Nebr.' 1950 67,275 - Kansas Citys on Mo. and Kans. Rivers, Mo. and Kans. 1980 42,434,197 - Kansas River Navigation2 1980 259,900 - Lower Grand River, Mo. 1966 - - Manhattan, Kansas River, Kans.' 1967 2,488,585 - Marysville, Kans.' - 133,682 - Mercer Lake, Weldon River, Mo.2 1976 432,245 - Merriam, Turkey Creek, Kans.' 1970 39,708 - Mill Lake, Blue River, Mo.3 1971 - - Missouri River at New Haven, Mo., 4 - 139,883 - Osawatomie, Pottawatomie Creek, Kans.' 1973 2,036,624 - Ottawa, Osage (Marais des Cygnes) River, Kans.' 1966 4,462,661 - Pattonsburg Lake, Grand River, Mo.2 1976 Pattonsburg Lake, Grand River, Mo. (Advance Highway Relocation)2 1976 390,763 Pattonsburg Lake, Grand River, Mo. (Advance Town Relocation)2 1976 91,929 - Pioneer Lake, Kans.5 1952 95,692 - Platte River, Mo., Channel Improvement3 1973 222,193 - Rathbun Lake Fish Hatchery' 1975 700,000 - Richland Lake, Mo.5 1948 8,548 - Salina, Smoky Hill River, Kans.' 1967 3,878,668 - Salt Creek, Barnard, Kans. , 4 - 127,860 - Seward, Nebr. , 4 - 126,887 - Smithville Channel, Little Platte River, Mo.3 1973 6,896 - Stonehouse Creek, Jefferson Co., Kans. 1, 4 1972 246,995 - Tomahawk Lake, Blue River, Kans.2 1976 77,189 Topeka, Kansas River, Kans.' 1974 21,174,593 - Trenton Lake, Thompson River, Mo.' 1966 - Upper Grand River, Mo.2 1966 - - Wolf-Coffee Lake, Blue River, Kans.2 1976 1,095,019 - 1. Completed. 5. Deauthorized. 2. Inactive. 6. Includes $481,106 cost of completed Shoal Creek 3. Deferred for restudy. Unit and $211,600 cost for inactive units, Little Chariton 4. Authorized by the Chief of Engineers under section River and Mussel Fork. 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended. 20-23 OMAHA, NE, DISTRICT* This district comprises portions of Montana, Wyoming, and Minnesota, all embraced in drainage basin of Mis- North Dakota, South Dakota, Colorado, Nebraska, Iowa, souri River along main stem and tributaries to Rulo, NE. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Fort Peck Lake, MT 2. Missouri River, Sioux City, IA to Rulo, NE 3. Other Authorized Navigation Projects 4. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization Flood Control 5. Bear Creek Lake, CO 6. Big Sioux River at Sioux City, IA and SD 7. Bowman-Haley Lake, ND 8. Chatfield Lake, CO 9. Cherry Creek Lake, CO 10. Fall River Basin, SD . 11. Frazer-Wolf Point, MT ... 12. Great Falls, MT 13. Miles City, MT 14. Missouri National Recreational River, NE and SD 15. Missouri River, Garrison Dam to Lake Oahe, ND 16. Missouri River, Kenslers Bend, NE to Sioux City, IA 17. Missouri River Levee System, Sioux City, IA to Mouth 18. Papillion Creek and Tributaries Lakes, NE 19. Pick-Sloan Missouri River Basin Program (Omaha Dist) 20. Pipestem Lake, ND 21. Rapid Creek, Rapid City, SD 22. Sturgis, SD 23. Salt Creek & Tributaries, NE Page Flood Control (cont.) 21-2 24. South Platte River Basin, CO 25. Inspection of Completed Flood 21-2 Control Works 26. Scheduling Flood Control 21-2 Reservoir Operations . 27. Other Authorized ... 21-2 Flood Control Projects 28. Flood Control Activities Under Special Authorization Page ........... 21-7 .......... 21-7 .......... 21-8 .......... 21-8 .......... 21-8 21-3 Multiple Purpose Projects Including Power 21-3 29. Big Bend Dam-Lake Sharpe, 21-3 Missouri River Basin, SD ...... 21-8 21-3 30. Fort Randall Dam-Lake Francis Case, 21-4 Missouri River Basin, SD ...... 21-8 21-4 31. Garrison Dam-Lake Sakakawea, 21-4 Missouri River Basin, ND .......... 21-9 21-5 32. Williston, ND Water Intake ........ 21-9 21-5 33. Gavins Point Dam-Lewis and Clark Lake, Missouri River Basin, NE 21-5 and SD ........... 21-9 34. Oahe Dam-Lake Oahe, Missouri 21-5 River Basin, SD and ND ....... 21-9 21-5 Miscellaneous 21-6 35. Streambank Erosion Control Evaluation and Demonstration 21-6 Project . . 21-10 21-6 21-6 21-7 21-7 21-7 General Investigations 36. Surveys 37. Collection & Study of Basic Data 38. Transportation Systems .21-10 . 21-10 . 21-10 *All cost and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 21-1 ) REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 Navigation 1. FORT PECK LAKE, MT Location. Reservoir is in Missouri River Valley in Mc- Cone, Valley, Garfield, Phillips, Petroleum, and Fergus Counties, MT. Dam is approximately 1,771.5 miles above mouth of Missouri River. Nearest towns are Glasgow, 17 miles northwest, and Nashua, 9 miles north. Existing project. A hydraulic earthfill dam with a maximum height of 250.5 feet and a reservoir for flood control, irrigation, navigation, hydroelectric power, and other purposes, with a gross storage capacity of 18,900,000 acre-feet at maximum operating pool. The power installations at the project were uprated in FY 1979. The 5 generators have a total output of 185,300 KW, 2 generators at 40,000 KW each, 2 generators at 43,500 KW each and 1 generator at 18,300 KW. See page 818 of 1965 Annual Report and page 905 of 1958 Annual Report for project details. Estimated cost of overall project (1981) is $158,487,425 including $1,936,000 Code 710 funds. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. None. Operation and results during fiscal year. New work: Public use facilities were designed with Code 710 funds. Maintenance: Design studies were completed for powerhouse improvements. Contracts for the Centralization of Controls and Modernization of the Power Plant are complete. A contract was awarded for installation of a powerplant controller system for the six Missouri River dams. Planning was initiated for rehabilitation of the townsite. Fort Peck Lake was operated in conjunction with the other Missouri River reservoirs for flood control, navigation, power production, and other multi-purpose uses. Generating facilities produced 1,337,332,000 net kilowatt hours of electricity. Total cost of Operation and Maintenance during the period was $4,141,400, however, reimbursement from the Western Area Power Administration for the prorata share of Operation and Maintenance cost of the power plant, reimbursement for furnishing operator's village facilities, and property disposals reduced net cost to $2,080,082. Annual project visitation was estimated at 413,800. Condition at end of fiscal year. Work started on original project in October 1933 and on second power plant in August 1956. The project was completed in 1965. On September 30, 1981, the pool was at elevation 2236.3 and 15,714,000 acre-feet of water was impounded in the reservoir. 2. MISSOURI RIVER, SIOUX CITY, IA TO MOUTH (SIOUX CITY, IA TO RULO, NE) Location. Channel of the Missouri River extending from Sioux City, IA to Rulo, NE. Previous projects. For details see page 1893, Annual Report for 1915, and page 1175, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Provides for a navigation channel of 9-foot depth and width not less than 300 feet, obtained by revetment of banks, rock dikes to contract and stabilize waterway, cutoffs to eliminate long bends, closing minor channels, and removal of snags and dredging as required. Estimated cost of new work Sioux City, IA to Rulo, NE is $190,500,000 (1981), through construction, exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects. (See Table 21-C for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must share in cost of recreation facilities in accordance with provisions of the Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Local interests have contributed for cost sharing on construction of recreation by constructing portions of the facilities. Terminal facilities. Terminal facilities for loading and unloading grain, liquids and dry bulk products are maintained by private interests at various locations on this section of the river. These terminals are listed in Table 21-F and are adequate for the current demands. Sites are available for construction of additional wharfage. Operations and results during fiscal year. Regular funds, New work: None. Maintenance: Contract maintenance work consisted of revetment and dike repair. Work by hired labor forces included removal of debris from environmental notches, repairing dikes and revetments. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was initiated on this section of the project (Sioux City to Rulo) in fiscal year 1928, and the bank stabilization work was completed in April 1979. Work remaining to complete this section of the project consists of construction of fish and wildlife facilities. A reliable channel suitable for navigation is available through this section. Controlling depth at ordinary stages of the river is 9 feet, with additional depths available during high stages. Commercial navigation was inaugurated on this section in May 1939, and common carrier transportation service was inaugurated in October 1946. Seven riverside recreation sites are complete and in operation. Local interests have assumed operation and maintenance of the recreation sites. (See Table 21-B for total cost of work under existing project to September 1981). 3. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS See Table 21-D. 4. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Small \avigation Projects Not Specifically Authorized by Congress (Sec. 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960, as amended, Public Lau' 645, 86th Congress). Operation and results during fiscal year. Detailed investigation on the Omaha Marina were completed. In addition to investigating the downtown Omaha site, three alternative sites, were investigated. These alternative sites which are located at Council Bluffs, IA, Bellevue, NE, and Dodge Park above Omaha, do not have the unique problems as those associated with the Omaha sites. These areas could be investigated further if local interest is shown. Douglas County, NE will be requested to reaffirm their desire to be the local sponsor for the potential marina before detailed studies are continued. Costs for this activity thru 30 September 1981 were $34,204. 21-2 OMAHA, NE, DISTRICT Flood Control 5. BEAR CREEK LAKE, CO Location. Damsite is on Bear Creek in Jefferson County, CO about 8 miles above the confluence of Bear Creek with the South Platte River at Denver. Existing project. Earthfill dam 170 feet high, with a crest length of about 5,120 feet, and a supplementary earthfill dike with a height of 80 feet and a crest length of 1,930 feet, to the south of the main dam, and an uncontrolled earth and rock-cut emergency spillway. The lake will provide storage capacity of 26,290 acre-feet for flood control and 2,000 acre-feet for sediment and recreation. Authorized by 1968 Flood Control Act (Senate Document 87, 90th Congress). Estimated cost through construction is $61,700,000 (1980). Local cooperation. Efforts to find a new sponsor for recreation development continued. Local interest will be required to: a. In accordance with the Federal Water Project Recreation Act: (1) administer land and water areas for recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement; (2) pay, contribute in kind, or repay with interest, one-half of the separable cost allocated to recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement; (3) bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of recreation and fish and wildlife lands and facilities including water replacement; (4) provide the water required for initial filling and replenishment of evaporation losses of the recreation pool by purchase or other means consistent with Federal and State laws, to assure effective operation of the project for recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement; b. hold and save the United States free from damages due to water-rights claims resulting from construction and operation of the project; c. prevent encroachment on the flow-carrying capacity of the channel below the reservoir to the extent necessary to provide for effective reservoir operation in the interest of flood control; d. adequately inform affected interests, at least annually, that the project will not provide complete flood protection; and e. provide guidance and leadership in preventing unwise and uneconomical future development of the flood plain areas by encouraging prudent management techniques to reduce future flood losses. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Design studies continued by hired labor. Construction of relocations continued. Construction of project roads was initiated. Maintenance: Routine operations and maintenance activities were performed. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project was initiated in October 1973 and advanced to 99 percent complete. Land acquisition was complete. Relocations were 98 percent complete. Construction of the dam is complete with the exception of instrumentation. Planning is underway on public use facilities. stream from the Interstate Highway 29 bridge to a point approximately 1,300 feet upstream of the Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul and Pacific Railroad Bridge. Levees will provide a high degree of protection to North Sioux City, SD and the Riverside Area of Sioux City, IA. Stone revetment will be placed along the improved channel at locations of potential erosion. Estimated cost is $7,984,000 (1980) of which $7,459,000 is Federal and $525,000 is non- Federal cost. Local cooperation. Section 3 of the Flood Control Act approved June 22, 1936 applies. Contracts required by Section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 to provide local cooperation were executed July 13, 1976. Operation and results during fiscal year. Project beautification was completed. O&M manuals by hired labor were completed. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was initiated in September 1976 and is essentially complete. 7. BOWMAN-HALEY LAKE, ND Location. Damsite is on North Fork of Grand River in southwestern North Dakota, about 6 miles above Haley, ND. Existing project. A dam and reservoir with a storage capacity of about 19,780 acre-feet for sediment storage, fish and wildlife conservation, recreation, and future water supply for communities of Bowman, Reeder, Scranton, and Gascoyne, ND. The project, as authorized by the 1962 Flood Control Act, also provided 73,200 acre-feet of exclusive flood control storage. Final cost is $4,372,174 (1973) of which $3,572,447 is ultimate Federal cost and $799,727 future non-Federal reimbursement for water supply. Supplemental cost sharing recreational facilities are proposed using Code 710 funds at an additional cost of $353,000. Local cooperation. Local interests must prevent encroachment on capacity of North Fork channel below reservoir; obtain water rights for storage; pay the United States for costs allocated to water supply; and hold the United States free from damages. Assurances of local cooperation were approved June 19, 1964. With respect to water rights, requirements have been complied with. Negotiation of a contract for future water supply is continuing. Operation and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance activities included sedimentation and reservoir regulation studies and intermittent inspections of the dam and structures. Project boundary fencing was initiated. Annual project visitation was estimated at 30,800. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was initiated in July 1964, and the project was completed in 1970. 6. BIG SIOUX RIVER AT SIOUX CITY, 8. CHATFIELD LAKE, CO IA AND SD Location. Near mouth of the Big Sioux River in the vicinity of Sioux City, Woodbury County, IA and North Sioux City, Union County, SD. Existing project. Channel improvement by enlargement and minor realignment along the existing channel up- Location. On the South Platte River, just below the mouth of Plum Creek, about eight miles upstream from Denver, CO. Existing project. Consists of rolled earth-fill dam with a maximum height of 148 feet and a reservoir with flood control capacity of 215,000 acre-feet and sediment capacity of 20,000 acre-feet, which will be used for recreation, and an 21-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 enlarged channel from the dam downstream to Denver to accommodate reservoir flood releases. Project was authorized by 1950 Flood Control Act. The Water Resources Act of 1974 (PL 93-251) authorized participation with local interests in acquisition of lands and development of recreation facilities immediately downstream of the Chatfield Dam in lieu of a portion of the channel improvement. Estimated cost through construction of the project is $102,691,000 (1981) of which $93,200,000 is Federal cost for construction, $6,591,000 local cost in connection with the downstream channel improvement, and $2,900,000 local cost for acquisition of water for the recreation pool. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936 applies to the downstream channel improvement. The Colorado Water Conservation Board provided assurances of local cooperation for the downstream improvement on December 13, 1967. Local interests must provide water for filling the sediment reserve pool for recreation use which the state agreed to on April 25, 1967. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Continued design by hired labor. Continued construction of the visitor center and rehabilitation of the outlet works. Initiated alterations to the Spring Gulch Drain, repairs to bridges and recreation facilities. Maintenance: continued routine operation and maintenance activities. Annual project visitation was estimated at 1,186,100. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project was initiated in August 1967 and is 93 percent complete, with a scheduled completion date in FY 1986. Acquisition of land is complete and relocations are essentially complete. Construction of the spillway and the final earthwork contract are complete. Construction of recreation facilities is 95 percent complete. Planning is underway for remaining dam facilities, downstream channel and public use facilities. 9. CHERRY CREEK LAKE, CO Location. Damsite is on Cherry Creek in Arapahoe County, CO, approximately 6 miles southeast of Denver, CO. just outside of city limits. Cherry Creek joins South Platte River within city limits of Denver. Existing project. A rolled-earthfill dam with maximum height of 141 feet above streambed and 14,300 feet long. Project includes a reinforced concrete outlet works and an uncontrolled side channel spillway canal discharging into adjacent Toll Gate Creek. Cherry Creek project provides reservoir storage capacity of 93,920 acre-feet below spillway canal invert and surcharge storage of 134,470 acrefeet. Plan of operation in ultimate development for multiple- purpose uses includes 13,960 acre-feet for sediment storage, 79,960 acre-feet for conservation purposes, and surcharge for flood control purposes. Estimated cost of project is $15,053,364 (1978) including $383,450 Code 710 funds. (See Table 21-C for authorizing legislation). Local cooperation. None required except for recreation cost-sharing under the Code 710 program. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance activities include administration of project area, continuation of sediment studies, stream gaging activities, embankment instrumentation and analysis, and miscellaneous items of ordinary repair and maintenance. A contract was awarded to provide stoplogs for flood control gates. Annual project visitation was estimated at 1,783,800. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in fiscal year 1946 and was completed in June 1961, exclusive of recreation facilities. 10. FALL RIVER BASIN, SD Location. In Custer and Fall River Counties, in and near the town of Hot Springs, SD. Hot Springs unit is in the town of Hot Springs, immediately south of the junction of Cold Brook and Hot Brook which combine to form the Fall River. Cold Brook Lake unit is approximately 1.25 miles north of the town of Hot Springs on Cold Brook; and Cottonwood Springs Lake unit is approximately 4.5 miles west of the town of Hot Springs on Cottonwood Springs Creek, one-half mile upstream from its confluence with Hot Brook. Existing project. Project as authorized by 1941 Flood Control Act, is a plan of flood protection on Fall River and Tributaries, SD, substantially in accordance with recommendations of Chief of Engineers in House Document 655, 76th Congress, 3d session. The general plan of improvement provides flood protection for Hot Springs, SD. The Hot Springs channel improvement unit consisted of widening, deepening and straightening 6,000 feet of channel of Fall River. The Cold Brook Lake unit, an earth-fill dam with appurtenant structures, controls an area of 70.5 square miles. The Cottonwood Springs Lake unit consists of an earth-fill dam with appurtenant structures and controls an area of 26 square miles. Final cost is $5,679,932 (1980), of which $5,537,432 is Federal cost for construction and $142,500 is local cost for lands and relocations. Project cost also includes $19,000 Code 710 funds for recreation facilities at Cold Brook Lake. Local cooperation. Local cooperation was required only for the Hot Springs Channel Improvement. These requirements have been fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Routine operation and maintenance activities were continued on the Cottonwood Springs and Cold Brook Dams and structures. Annual project visitation was estimated for Cold Brook Lake and Cottonwood Springs Lake at 44,800 and 11,400 respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of Hot Springs unit was completed during fiscal year 1951. Construction of Cold Brook unit dam and appurtenances was completed in fiscal year 1953 with exception of a road and parking area which were completed in fiscal year 1955. Construction of the Cottonwood Springs unit dam was completed in fiscal year 1970, with the exception of the recreation facilities which were completed in fiscal year 1972. 11. FRAZER-WOLF POINT, MT Location. Along the Missouri River approximately 4 miles southwest of Frazer, MT. Existing project. The project consists of stonefill dike construction on the right bank and stonefill revetment protection on the left bank upstream and downstream of the Frazer-Wolf Point Irrigation Unit intake structure. The estimated cost of the project (1981) is $435,000. 21-4 OMAHA, NE, DISTRICT Local cooperation. Section 3 of the Flood Control Act approved 22 June 1936 applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Construction was initiated and completed. O&M manuals were initiated by hired labor. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was initiated in October 1980 and completed in December 1980. Preparation of O&M manuals are underway. 12. GREAT FALLS, MT Location. In Great Falls, Cascade County, MT at confluence of the Sun and Missouri Rivers. Existing project. Provides for levees along the left bank of the Sun River and an interceptor ditch and closed conduit to collect and convey side-hill runoff to the Sun River. Project was authorized by 1958 Flood Control Act and amended by the 1965 Flood Control Act to waive the requirement that local interests contribute in cash a percentage of the construction costs of all items of work provided by the United States. Estimated cost through construction of the project is $13,352,000 (1981) of which $11,300,000 is Federal cost of construction and $2,052,000 is local cost for lands, relocations and a cash contribution for replacement of a storm sewer conduit desired by local interests. Local cooperation. Section 3. Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936 applies. In addition local interests must zone the unleveed portion of the flood channel through the damage area to preserve its capacity and to prevent further encroachments and contribute in cash $179,000 representing the estimated cost of replaced storm drainage facilities which will be incorporated into the closed conduit of the Watson Coulee Interceptor. West Great Falls Flood Control and Drainage District provided assurances on 17 January 1968. State Supreme Court decision on assessments required a change in state law which was enacted in 1973. The final court ruling on compliance was made 1 April 1981 and the local sponsor was instructed to proceed toward project construction. Operations and results during fiscal year. A contract for construction of the closed conduit was awarded in September 1981. Engineering and design continued by hired labor. Condition at end of fiscal year. A contract for construction of the Watson-Coulee Interceptor Conduits was awarded 29 September 1981. 13. MILES CITY, MT Location. On the right banks of the Tongue and Yellowstone Rivers at Miles City, MT. Existing project. The plan authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1950 provides for construction of levees along the right banks of the Tongue and Yellowstone Rivers starting about 1,000 feet upstream from the Interstate 94 embankment and extending approximately five miles downstream. Estimated cost through construction of the project is $8,070,000 (1981) of which $5,880,000 is Federal cost and $2,190,000 non-Federal cost. Local cooperation. Section 3 of the Flood Control Act approved 22 June 1936 applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preparation of the Phase II General Design Memorandum continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Phase II General Design Memorandum is currently underway. 14. MISSOURI NATIONAL RECREATIONAL RIVER, NE, AND SD Location. NE and SD. The Missouri River between Gavins Point Dam and Ponca State Park, NE. This includes Cedar and Dixon Counties in Nebraska, and Yankton, Clay, and Union Counties in South Dakota. Existing project. The project was authorized by Section 707 of the National Parks and Recreation Act of 1978. The designation as a National Recreational River will preserve outstanding and important scenic values and will provide additional opportunities for river access and recreation use. Erosion control, consisting of bank stabilization and river management techniques designed to preserve the existing environment, will at the same time preserve high bank flood plain lands. Federal cost of the project is limited by the authorization to $21,000,000. Local cooperation. None required. Operation and results during fiscal year. Engineering and design and resource surveys continued by hired labor. Condition at end of fiscal year. Surveys for cultural resources, visual resources, wildlife resource values, and mineral resources are continuing. 15. MISSOUIRI RIVER, GARRISON DAM TO LAKE OAHE, ND Location. Along the channel of Missouri River between Garrison Dam and headwaters of Oahe Reservoir in North Dakota. Existing project. Consists of bank stabilization and rectification works required to stabilize banks of Missouri River in specific areas and prevent further loss of agricultural lands through erosion. Estimated total cost is $9,670,000 (1981) of which $9,400,000 is Federal and $270,000 non-Federal. Project was authorized by Flood Control Acts of 1963 and 1968. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies. Sponsorship of project is being provided by North Dakota State Water Commission. Operations and results during fiscal year. Contracts for corrective construction were awarded in September 1981 with completion scheduled in FY 1982. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was initiated January 1965 and project is 99 percent complete. 16. MISSOURI RIVER, KENSLERS BEND, NE, TO SIOUX CITY, IA Location. Project is along Missouri River between Ponca Bend, NE, and combination bridge at Sioux City, IA. Existing project. Authorized by 1941 Flood Control Act and modified by 1948 Flood Control Act provides for construction of dikes, revetments and channel improvement 21-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 along Missouri River from Miners Bend and vicinity, SD and NE, to Sioux City, IA. Federal cost of new work under project is $11,294,414. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operation and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance consisted of revetment repair and rehabilitation of environmental notches. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was started in June 1946 and completed in June 1961. 17. MISSOURI RIVER LEVEE SYSTEM, IOWA, NEBRASKA, KANSAS AND MISSOURI (SIOUX CITY, IA TO RULO, NE) Location. On both banks of the Missouri River from Sioux City, IA to St. Louis, MO. Active portion of the project in Omaha District extends from Council Bluffs, IA to Rulo, NE. Existing project. A series of levee units and appurtenant works along both sides of Missouri River from Sioux City, IA, to mouth, for protection of agricultural lands and small communities against floods. Cost estimate for active portion of project from Council Bluffs, IA to Rulo, NE is $42,000,000 (1981) of which $37,400,000 is Federal cost for construction and $4,600,000 local costs for lands and damages. (See Table 21-C for authorizing legislation). Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936 applies. Fully complied with for all completed units. Local interests have furnished assurances of their willingness and ability to fulfill local cooperation requirements for the remaining active units. Operation and results during fiscal year. Completed detailed design of Stage 3 on unit L-611-614 and initiated construction of Stage 2. Construction of Stage 1 continued. Remedial studies were initiated on completed units L-627, L-624 and L-561-550. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was initiated June 1948. (See Table 21-E for status of active units). Construction was initiated on Levee Unit L-611-614 in September 1980 and is 57 percent complete. Studies continued on completed units L-627, L-624 and L-561-550 and are 27 percent complete. Construction of Unit R-616 is still being delayed by a temporary restraining order. 18. PAPILLION CREEK AND TRIBUTARIES LAKES, NE Location. The Papillion Creek basin is located in Washington, Douglas, and Sarpy Counties, NE. Big Papillion Creek rises west of Blair, flows southeasterly through metropolitan Omaha area where it is joined by the Little Papillion Creek just above Offutt AFB, forming Papillion Creek. The combined creek flows along the side of Offutt AFB to its confluence with the Missouri River. Existing project. The active project consists of a series of four dams and reservoirs on tributaries of Papillion Creek. The project was authorized for flood control, recreation, and water quality control by the 1968 Flood Control Act. (House Document 349, 90th Congress). Estimated Federal appropriation requirement through construction of the project is $51,200,000 (1981). Estimated non-Federal cost sharing for recreation facilities is $4,070,000 which includes Federal reimbursement of $3,841,000. Local cooperation. Local interests are required to: (a) maintain the Papillion Creek channels downstream from the damsites free of obstructions and available to accommodate reservoir releases and uncontrolled flow; (b) insure that all new bridge construction, and future modification of existing bridges, downstream from reservoirs of the proposed system, shall have hydraulic capacity acceptable to the Chief of Engineers; (c) provide guidance and leadership in preventing unwise and uneconomical future development of the flood plain areas by encouraging prudent use of flood proofing, land regulation planning, or other flood plain management techniques to reduce flood losses; (d) hold and save the United States free from all damages arising from water-rights claims resulting from the construction and operation of the reservoirs; (e) exercise, to the full extent of their legal capability, control against removal of streamflow made available for water quality control; and (f) in accordance with the Federal Water Project Recreation Act: (1) administer project land and water areas for recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement; (2) pay, contribute in kind, or repay (which may be through user fees) with interest, one-half of the separable first cost of the project allocated to recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement; and (3) bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of lands and facilities for recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Design for Sites 18 and 20 continued by hired labor. Construction was initiated at Site 20 during July 1981. Maintenance: Routine operations and maintenance activities continued at Sites 11 and 16. Annual project visitation was estimated at 775,100. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project was initiated in FY 1972. Construction was completed on Standing Bear Lake (Site 16) in December 1978 and Glenn Cunningham Lake (Site 11) in December 1979. Construction at Site 20 is 3 percent complete. Design of Sites 18 and 20 continued by hired labor. 19. PICK-SLOAN MISSOURI BASIN PROGRAM (OMAHA DISTRICT) Location. Flood control improvements in this project are along Missouri River and several of its principal tributaries and in states comprising Missouri River Basin. Existing project. General comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in Missouri River Basin provides for levees along Missouri River between Sioux City, IA, and mouth and reservoirs on main stem of Missouri River and tributaries for control of floodflows at damsites (See Table 21-C for authorizing legislation, see Table 21-G on projects in Omaha District included in comprehensive plan, and individual reports). 20. PIPESTEM LAKE, ND Location. On Pipestem Creek in Stutsman County, ND, 3 miles upstream from where Pipestem Creek joins the James River at Jamestown, ND. Existing project. Authorized by 1965 Flood Control Act, the project consists of a rolled earth-fU dam approx- 21-6 OMAHA, NE, DISTRICT imately 108 feet high with a crest length of 4,000 feet and outlet works of a gated reinforced concrete conduit. The reservoir provides 146,880 acre-feet of storage. The multipurpose pool provides space for silt storage and 885 acres of water surface for fish, wildlife and recreation needs. Final Federal cost (1977) is $9,277,545, non-Federal cost for recreation facilities cost sharing is $141,000. Local cooperation. Local interests are required to administer project land and water areas for recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement and to bear the first cost of associated improvements in the wildlife management area; pay, contribute in kind, or repay, with interest, one-half of the separable cost of the project allocated to recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of recreation and fish and wildlife lands and facilities. Operation and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance activities continued. Annual project visitation was estimated at 127,700. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project was initiated in FY 1970 and completed in FY 1977. 21. RAPID CREEK, RAPID CITY, SD Location. On Rapid Creek on the west side of Rapid City in Pennington County, SD. Existing project. The project was authorized by the Chief of Engineers on 1 May 1976, under authority provided by Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. The estimated cost of construction is $1,353,000 (1981) of which $1,004,000 is Federal and $349,000 non- Federal. This project provides levee and channel improvements through the west side of Rapid City's residential and commercial areas and modifications to a railroad bridge across Rapid Creek. Local cooperation. A contract with the City of Rapid City to sponsor the project was approved on 21 March 1977. Operations and results during fiscal year. Project beautification was completed. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was initiated September 1977 and complete in September 1981. 22. STURGIS, SD Location. On Deadman Gulch through the City of Sturgis, in Meade County, SD. Existing project. The project was authorized by the Chief of Engineers on 1 June 1976, under authority provided by Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. The estimated cost of construction is $4,089,000 (1981) of which $3,000,000 is Federal and $1,089,000 non- Federal. This project provides a concrete lined channel through Sturgis' residential and commercial areas, training dikes upstream of the lined channel, a debris basin upstream of Interstate 90, and a railroad bridge span at the lined channel crossing. Local cooperation. The City of Sturgis signed a 221 contract on 18 August 1975 to sponsor the project. Operations and results during fiscal year. Construction was completed. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was started in April 1979 and completed in April 1981. 23. SALT CREEK AND TRIBUTARIES, NE Location. Salt Creek Basin comprises an area of about 1,627 square miles in and around Lincoln in southeastern Nebraska. Existing project. The authorized project consists of a system of 10 dams and reservoirs, channel clearing, enlarging and realignment, levees and necessary bridge alterations. Project for flood protection was authorized by 1958 Flood Control Act, as recommended by Chief of Engineers in House Document 396, 84th Congress, 2d session. Final cost of improvements for the active program is $12,245,621 (1980), of which $12,074,621 is Federal cost and $171,000 non-Federal cost. Pursuant to Senate Resolution adopted August 7, 1964, which authorized a review of Salt Creek survey report, remaining units were placed in "inactive" classification. Funds were transferred to the project in FY 1980 with concurrence of Congressional Committees. These funds were to be used to correct a dispersive clay problem in the completed downstream levees through Lincoln. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for the completed levee and channel improvement part of the project. For the dams, local interests are required to operate and maintain the permanent pools for fish and wildlife conservation and assume all costs related to utilization of the permanent pools for recreational purposes and insure public access to the pools. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Construction is complete. Corrective construction on the levees thru Lincoln was completed in September 1980. A report and recommendation on additional repairs will be made during FY 1982. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance activities included sedimentation and reservoir regulation studies, intermittent inspections of the dams and structures, and rehabilitation of the outlet works. Annual visitation to the system of dams was estimated at 3,040,800. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project began in the spring of 1962. All work under the active portion of the project, consisting of the 10 dams and reservoirs and the channel improvements and levees through Lincoln, was completed in 1969. Initial corrective construction on the levee is complete. 24. SOUTH PLATTE RIVER BASIN, CO Location. Flood control improvements in this project are along the South Platte River and its tributaries in Colorado. Existing project. General plan for flood control and other purposes provides for construction of Chatfield Lake on the South Platte River, Bear Creek Lake on Bear Creek, 25. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL WORKS Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, and subsequent acts require local interests furnish assurances that they will maintain and operate certain local protection projects after 21-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by Secretary of the Army. District Engineers are responsible for administration of these regulations within the boundaries of their respective districts. Inspections of completed local protection projects which have been turned over to local interests for maintenance and operation during the fiscal year are set forth in Table 21-H, Inspections of Completed Local Protection Projects. Fiscal year costs were $173,834. 26. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS Under sections 7 and 9, Flood Control Act of December 22, 1944, Corps of Engineers is responsible for detailed scheduling of operations of storage capacity reserved for or assigned to flood control in reservoirs constructed by Bureau of Reclamation as well as those constructed by Corps of Engineers. Costs for FY 1981 were $218,365 and total costs to September 30, 1981 were $3,624,799. 27. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For status and cost of other authorized Flood Control Projects in the Omaha District see Table 21-I. 28. FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency Flood Control Activities - Repair, Flood Fighting and Rescue Work (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation). Federal costs for FY 1981 were $223,305 for disaster preparedness $13,633 for emergency operations, $36 for repair and restoration, and $5,760 for advance measures. Small Flood Control Projects Not Specifically Authorized by Congress (Sec. 205, 1948 Flood Control Act as amended, Public Law 858, 80th Cong., June 30, 1948). See detailed report for operations on Rapid City and Sturgis, SD. See Table 21-J for preauthorization studies on potential projects. Emergency Bank Protection (Sec. 14, 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Cong., July 24, 1946). Operations under this heading were as follows: Negative reconnaissance reports were made on two projects at a cost of $16,696. Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 29. BIG BEND DAM-LAKE SHARPE, MISSOURI RIVER BASIN, SD Location. On Missouri River, 987.4 miles above mouth, near Fort Thompson, SD, and approximately 20 miles upstream from Chamberlain, SD. Dam is located in the upstream reach of Fort Randall Reservoir. Big Bend Reservoir extends upstream to Pierre, SD. Existing project. A rolled-earthfill dam 95 feet high, a hydroelectric generating plant consisting of eight 58,500 kilowatt units, and a chute-type gated spillway. Reservoir provides gross storage of 1,907,000 acre-feet. Project was authorized by 1944 Flood Control Act as part of general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in Missouri River Basin. Estimated cost is $107,449,597 (1981) including $329,000 Code 710 funds. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Public use facilities were constructed with Code 710 funds. Maintenance: Project was operated in conjunction with other Missouri River reservoirs for flood control, navigation, power production and other multiple uses. During the period, 1,028,826,000 net kilowatt-hours of electricity were produced. A contract was awarded for installation of a power plant controller system for the Missouri River dams. Annual project visitation was estimated at 988,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in September 1959 and was completed in September 1977, except for Code 710 recreation facilities. On September 30, 1980, reservoir pool was at elevation 1420.6 feet mean sea level and a total volume of 1,723,000 acre-feet of water was impounded. 30. FORT RANDALL DAM-LAKE FRANCIS CASE, MISSOURI RIVER BASIN, SD Location. On Missouri River in Charles, Mix and Gregory Counties, SD, about 82 miles above Yankton, SD. Site is 880 miles above mouth of Missouri River and 148 miles above Sioux City, IA. Existing project. A rolled-earthfill dam with a maximum height of 165 feet and a reservoir for flood control, irrigation, navigation, hydroelectric power, and other purposes, with a gross storage capacity of 5,600,000 acre-feet at maximum operating pool. The power installation consists of eight units rated at 40,000 kilowatts each. Project was authorized by Flood Control Act of 1944 as part of general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in Missouri River Basin. Estimated cost of project is $198,797,140 (1981), of which $197,402,140 is Federal cost for construction, $675,000 Code 710 funds, and $720,000 local cost for approaches to Platte-Winner Bridge. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Project was operated in conjunction with other Missouri River reservoirs for flood control, navigation, power production, and other multiple uses. Generating facilities produced 1,860,476,000 net kilowatt-hours of electricity. A contract was awarded for installation of a power plant controller system for the Missouri River dams. Planning was initiated for rehabilitation of the townsite. Annual project visitation was estimated at 2,243,100. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in May 1946 and was completed in 1969, except for Code 710 recreation facilities. On September 30, 1981, reservoir pool was at elevation 1349.6 feet mean sea level and 3,263,000 acre-feet of water was impounded. 21-8 OMAHA, NE, DISTRICT 31. GARRISON DAM-LAKE SAKAKAWEA, MISSORI RIVER BASIN, ND Location. On Missouri River in McLean and Mercer Counties, ND, about 11 miles south of Garrison, ND, and 9 miles west of Coleharbor, ND. 1,889.9 miles above mouth of river and 75 miles above Bismarck, ND. Existing project. A rolled-earthfill dam 11,300 feet long with a maximum height of 210 feet and a reservoir for flood control, irrigation, navigation, hydroelectric power, and other purposes with a gross storage capacity of 24,200,000 acre-feet. It provides five power units, three units rated at 80,000 kilowatts each, and two units rated at 95,000 kilowatts each, three flood control tunnels and a gated spillway. Existing project was authorized by 1944 Flood Control Act as part of general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in Missouri River Basin, and by Public Works Appropriation Act, 1968. Estimated Federal cost is $300,745,341 (1981) including $1,393,000 Code 710 funds and $4,208,000 for major rehabilitation. Non-Federal contribution in connection with widening Snake Creek Embankment was $687,000. Local cooperation. None required except cost sharing with the State of North Dakota for widening the Snake Creek Embankment. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Public use facilities were constructed with Code 710 funds. Maintenance: Project was operated in conjunction with the other Missouri River reservoirs for flood control, navigation, power production, and other multiple purpose uses. Normal operation and maintenance procedures were accomplished during the Fiscal year. Generating facilities produced 2,417,254,000 net kilowatt-hours of electricity. A contract was awarded for installation of a power plant controller system for the Missouri River dams. Planning was initiated for rehabilitation of the townsite. Annual project visitation was estimated at 1,983,100. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project was initiated in April 1946 and completed in 1966, except for recreational development using Code 710 funds. Planning was in progress for remaining recreational facilities and minor remaining items. On September 30, 1981, pool elevation was 1833.3 and 16,970,000 acre-feet of water was impounded. 32. WILLISTON, ND WATER INTAKE Location. The water intake for the City of Williston is located on abandoned bridge piers adjacent to the Lewis and Clark Bridge, in the Missouri River, Williams County, ND. Existing project. The project was authorized by the Water Resource Development Act of 1976 and consists of relocation of the water intake to an area in the channel not affected by fluctuating reservoir conditions, thus providing a constant supply of water to the City of Williston, ND. The estimated cost of the project is $1,130,000 (1981). The authorization act limited Federal cost to $1,000,000. Locals will pay remaining estimated costs of $130,000. Operations and results during fiscal year. Construction was completed. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was initiated in August 1980 and completed in July 1981. 33. GAVINS POINT DAM-LEWIS AND CLARK LAKE, MISSOURI RIVER BASIN, NE AND SD Location. On Missouri River in Yankton County, SD, and Knox County, NE, about 4 miles upstream from Yankton, SD, and 811.1 miles above mouth of river. Existing project. A concrete and rolled-earth-fill dam with a maximum height of 74 feet and a reservoir for flood control, irrigation, navigation, hydroelectric power, and other purposes with a gross storage capacity of 517,000 acre-feet at maximum operating pool. The power installation consists of three units rated at 33,333 kilowatts each. Existing project was authorized by 1944 Flood Control Act as part of general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in Missouri River Basin. Cost estimate is $49,393,550 (1980), including $1,337,000 Code 710 funds. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Project was operated in conjunction with other Missouri River reservoirs for flood control, navigation, power production and other multiple purpose uses. Generating units produced 788,359,000 net kilowatt-hours of electricity during fiscal year. Recreational areas were extensively used by the public. A contract was awarded for installation of a power plant controller system for the Missouri River dams. Annual project visitation was estimated at 2,662,300. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of original project was initiated in March 1952 and was completed in 1964. Project is providing its multiple purpose benefits for flood control, navigation, power, and other uses. On September 30, 1981, pool elevation was 1208.2 and 447,000 acre-feet of water was impounded. 34. OAHE DAM-LAKE OAHE, MISSOURI RIVER BASIN, SD AND ND Location. Dam is on Missouri River in Hughes and Stanley Counties, SD, about 6 miles northwest of Pierre, SD, and 1,072.3 miles above mouth of river. Existing project. A rolled-earthfill dam with maximum height of 245 feet and reservoir for flood control, irrigation, navigation, hydroelectric power, and other purposes with a gross storage capacity of 23,500,000 acre-feet at maximum operating pool. It contains seven power units rated at 85,000 kilowatts each. Existing project was authorized by 1944 Flood Control Act as part of general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in Missouri River Basin. Estimated cost is $345,146,204 (1980) including $970,000 Code 710 funds. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Public use facilities were constructed with Code 710 funds. Maintenance: Project was operated in conjunction with the other Missouri River reservoirs for flood control, navigation, power production and other multiple purpose uses. GLnerating facilities produced 2,704,087,000 net kilowatthours of electricity. A contract was awarded for installation of a power plant controller system on the Missouri River dams. Annual project visitation was estimated at 2,177,600. 21-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was initiated August 1948 and project placed in operation June 1963. Land acquisition is 97 percent complete. All power units are on line and producing power. On September 30, 1981, pool elevation was 1592.6 and 14,829,000 acre-feet of water was impounded. 35. STREAMBANK EROSION CONTROL EVALUATION AND DEMONSTRATION PROJECT Location. Along the Missouri River between Garrison Dam and Lake Oahe, ND and between Fort Randall Dam and Sioux City, IA; along the Yellowstone River in Montana and North Dakota; and along undesignated rivers and streams in the Omaha District. Existing project. The project provides for development of new methods and techniques for bank protection. It consists of various experimental bank stabilization structures designed to stabilize the river banks and prevent further loss of land through erosion. The project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Acts of 1974 and 1976. Local cooperation. The sponsor is the North Dakota State Water Commission for the North Dakota portion of the Yellowstone River as well as the Missouri River, Garrison Dam to Lake Oahe portion. The sponsors for the Missouri River, Fort Randall Dam-Lewis & Clark Lake portion are the Lower Niobrara Natural Resources District, NE and the Charles Mix County Conservation District, SD. The sponsors for the Missouri River, Gavins Point Dam- Sioux City, IA portion are the Lewis and Clark Natural Resource District, NE, and Clay, Union, and Yankton Counties, SD. The sponsor for the Montana portion of the Yellowstone River are the Richland County Commissioners. The sponsor for the Powder River at Arvada, WY, is the Sheridan County Board of County Commissioners. Operations and results during fiscal year. Construction was performed along the Missouri River in North Dakota in the Knife Point, Price, Pretty Point, Hancock, Fort Lincoln, Horseshoe Butte, Wildwood, Coal Lake Coulee, and Sandstone Bluff Areas, and in South Dakota in the White Swan Area. Work was also done along the Yellowstone River in North Dakota in the Cheney Creek Area, and in Montana in the River Road Area. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was initiated in November 1976 on the Missouri River between Garrison Dam and Lake Oahe and between Gavins Point Dam and Sioux City, IA. Construction was initiated in August 1978 on the Missouri River between Fort Randall Dam and Lewis & Clark Lake. Construction was initiated in October 1980 on the Yellowstone River between Intake, MT and the mouth. Except for some structure rehabilitation, construction is complete. General Investigations 36. SURVEYS Costs for FY 1981 amounted to $1,536,532 of which $1,130,151 was for flood control studies, $63,298 review of authorized projects, and $343,083 for coordination studies with other agencies. 37. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA (Precipitation Studies) No work during the period. (Inspection of Dams) National Dam Safety Program Inspection of Dams - During FY 1981, 42 non-Federal dams were inspected in the five state area of Colorado, Nebraska, North Dakota, South Dakota and Wyoming, assigned to the Omaha District. The cost for FY 1981 was $520,460. Inventory of Dams - During FY 1981 work on the inventory of dams was completed at a cost of $10,119. The total cost of this program since inception was $726,050. There are approximately 7,383 dams in the five state area assigned to the Omaha District. (Flood Plain Management Services) Flood Plain Information Reports - None. A study was completed for Missouri River, Gavins Point Dam to Rulo, NE, Volume IV, River Mile 811.1 - 746.3. This study was distributed in FY 81 as part of four volumes to be completed by the Omaha District. Cost during FY 81 was $24,399 for this volume. Work is continuing on the Cache la Poudre River Special Study. This study will be completed in FY 82. Cost during FY 81 was $1,551. Flood Plain Management Flood plain management service costs for the Omaha District were $80,292 and the costs for the Missouri River Division office were $41,717 during the fiscal year. Technical Services The costs for providing site investigations and flood hazard evaluations to military and non-military Federal agencies, state and local government agencies, and to individuals and businesses were $206,569. Hydrologic Studies Costs for hydrologic studies for the fiscal year were $34,293. 38. TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS The Corps of Engineers is the lead agency in the ongoing National Waterways Study. This Study examines the characteristics of the National Waterways System, its past and present role in commerce and in meeting national needs, along with projections and recommendations for future development, and its relationship to other modes of transportation. In FY 1981 extensive data on the Missouri River Waterway was furnished the study contractors and a final work plan was established. Cost for FY 1981 was $11,108. 21-10 OMAHA NE, DISTRICT TABLE 21-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Project Funding I. Fort Peck, Lake New Work: MT Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 2. Missouri River, New Work: Sioux City, IA Approp. to Rulo, NE Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 5. Bear Creek Lake, New Work: CO Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 6. Big Sioux River New Work: at Sioux City, Approp. IA Cost 7. Bowman-Haley New Work: Lake, ND Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 8. Chatfield Lake, New Work: CO Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 9. Cherry Creek New Work: Lake, CO Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 10. Fall River New Work: Basin, SD Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 11. Frazer-Wolf New Work: Point, MT Approp. Cost 12. Great Falls, MT New Work: Approp. Cost 13. Miles City, MT New Work: Approp. Cost Total Thru FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 Sept 30, 1981 975,000 647,330 1,417,006 1,410,631 237,000 321,962 1,531,000 1,636,549 5,560,000 7,118,458 3,128,000 656,673 112,000 142,917 1,530,000 1,779,401 43,000 44,862 222,000 232,939 283,000 289,298 10,251 400,000 111,817 38,000 62,236 107,000 459,670 2,286,000 1,957,973 -15,000 119,709 2,315,000 2,320,798 4,442,000 4,522,765 2,335,000 2,976,213 60,500 63,448 1,385,000 399,622 174,000 173,474 246,000 225,347 18,000 17,500 429,000 455,479 -330,000 10,220 155,000 98,267 40,000 25,668 -4,344 -4,344 1,527,000 1,834,824 218,000 193,201 2,645,000 2,426,596 1,158,000 791,523 107,000 96,470 -299,000 1,906,110 78,000 73,757 772,000 1,678,085 155,000 180,579 238,000 255,230 1,000 1,500 127,000 117,287 111,000 9,360 -266,000 73,772 60,000 58,859 11,000 8,521 2,017,000 2,080,082 20,000 50,234 2,003,000 2,480,742 584,000 906,602 194,000 181,266 100,423 238,000 227,011 721,000 793,341 47,000 45,604 276,000 257,390 176,000 181,577 254,000 354,847 128,000 130,205 28,279 158,352,080 158,349,601 33,591,670 33,536,530 189,225,9911 189,224,2181 93,521,4192 93,511,515 2 61,291,600 61,198,288 301,000 277,736 7,458,934 7,450,193 4,372,174 4,372,174 949,043 932,519 85,901,700 85,820,339 667,800 655,485 15,053,364 15,053,364 2,792,511 2,767,940 5,538,432 5,538,432 1,707,141 1,696,246 435,000 428,657 792,112 779,360 283,0003 281,6833 21-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Thru in Text Project Funding FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 Sept 30, 1981 14. Missouri National Recreational River NE & SD 15. Missouri River, Garrison Dam to Lake Oahe, ND 16. Missouri River, Kenslers Bend, NE, to Sioux City, IA 17. Missouri River, Levees, IA, NE, KS & MO 18. Papillion Creek and Tributaries Lakes, NE 20. Pipestem Lake, ND 21. Rapid Creek, Rapid City, SD 22. Sturgis, SD 23. Salt Creek and Tributaries, NE 29. Big Bend Dam- Lake Sharpe, Missouri River Basin, SD 30. Fort Randall Dam-Lake Francis Case, Missouri River Basin, SD New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost - 500,000 100,000 - 391,189 177,481 691,600 324,000 60,000 774,091 507,543 268,994 60,000 48,399 600,000 568,670 9,321,000 9,194,766 - 11,294,414 - 11,294,414 385,000 420,738 -30,000 19,825 33,000 38,533 50,000 48,714 4,194,000 4,188,978 765,000 -481,000 286,000 7,955,000 30,482,388 117,429 130,628 279,727 7,774,971 30,257,945 300,000 100,000 226,583 115,903 -70,000 900,000 25,532,100 6,720 610,001 25,218,082 72,000 139,000 135,000 196,000 72,578 143,547 130,749 179,918 316,000 189,000 206,000 206,000 304,429 206,678 201,530 205,168 529,000 178,000 568,237 248,905 -10,000 68,747 65,000 1,775,000 982,939 64,875 1,737,312 1,020,201 - - 280,000 - - 201,244 1,110 3,476 592,000 570,306 9,277,545 9,277,545 1,156,000 1,149,695 1,004,000 998,468 3,000,000 2,999,999 70,000 12,197,6004 97,201 12,146,0664 369,000 574,000 924,000 549,000 455,471 529,665 911,943 647,745 38,574 243,000 30,145 254,198 4,365,475 4,351,625 37,000 107,193,597 30,819 107,187,416 2,469,000 2,954,000 2,530,000 2,617,000 25,796,974 2,507,863 2,918,494 2,524,990 2,711,161 25,766,229 60,000 2,048 13,000 69,348 1,604 - 198,065,883 - 198,065,819 3,538,000 4,016,000 3,799,000 4,393,900 48,408,191 3,608,901 3,951,419 3,717,013 4,582,201 48,328,212 21-12 OMAHA, NE, DISTRICT TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Thru in Text Project Funding FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 Sept 30, 1981 31. Garrison Dam- New Work: Lake Sakakawea, Approp. 308,000 729,000 - 33,000 294,930,613 Missouri River Cost 651,952 615,762 185,206 18,930 294,915,306 Basin, ND Maint. (Federal Funds) Approp. 4,887,000 4,535,500 4,359,000 4,478,900 55,179,120 Cost 5,069,641 4,577,923 4,455,665 4,529,974 55,065,023 Major Rehab Approp. - - - - 4,208,310 Cost - - - - 4,208,310 (Contributed Major Rehab Funds) Contrib. - - - - 686,961 Cost - - - - 686,961 32. Williston, ND New Work: Water Intake Approp. 120,000 - 880,000 - 1,000,000 Cost 50,257 11,759 81,911 844,656 988,583 33. Gavins Point New Work: Dam-Lewis & Approp. 113,000 2,000 -1,000 - 49,231,239 Clark Lake, Cost 52,806 63,737 6 - 49,231,239 Missouri River Maint. Basin, SD Approp. 2,868,000 3,089,000 2,963,000 and NE 3,131,000 37,856,415 Cost 2,896,060 3,338,313 2,929,868 3,196,104 37,821,308 34. Oahe Dam-Lake New Work: Oahe, Missouri Approp. 266,826 128,000 - 9,000 344,590,603 River Basin, Cost 169,534 212,401 49,479 42,388 344,571,374 SD & ND Maint. Approp. 4,271,000 5,228,354 4,735,000 4,572,200 46,082,379 Cost 4,328,480 4,623,949 5,281,687 4,658,458 45,996,653 35. Evaluation and New Work: Demonstration Approp. 2,730,000 4,575,000 5,049,000 2,305,000 17,034,000 Project Cost 2,898,267 4,096,407 4,296,517 3,723,222 16,192,784 1. Includes $18,325,581 National Industrial Recovery 3. Does not include $79,700 allocated for restudy of Act funds, $8,625,718 emergency relief funds, and the project. $1,181,125 for previous project. 4. Includes $123,000 of government cost applicable to 2. Includes $325,122 for previous project and $200,000 that portion of the project which is currenlty being carried fiscal year 1968 supplemental appropriation funds. in a deferred status. TABLE 21-B MISSOURI RIVER, SIOUX CITY, IA TO RULO, NE TOTAL COST OF EXISTING PROJECT TO SEPTEMBER 30, 1981 (See Section 2 of Text) Cost Funding New Work Maintenance Total Regular Funds 162,272,919 93,511,515 255,784,434 Public Works Funds 18,325,581 - 18,325,581 Emergency Relief Funds 8,625,718 - 8,625,718 Total Funds 189,224,218 93,511,515 282,735,733 21-13 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 21-C AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Jan 12, 1927 MISSOURI RIVER, SIOUX CITY, IA TO RULO, NE. (See Section 2 of Text) Appropriation of $12 million authorized for existing project. H. Doc. 1120, 60th Cong., 2d Sess. July 3, 1930 Appropriation of $15 million additional allotments totaling $29,153,108 made by Public Works Administration under provisions of National Industrial Recovery Act of 1938, and $9,669,791 allotted under provisions of Emergency Relief Appropriations Act of 1935. For completion of project from mouth to Sioux City, IA. For a channel of 9-foot depth and 300-foot width. CHERRY CREEK LAKE, CO. (See Section 9 of Text) Initiation and partial accomplishment of project. Completion of plan approved in Act of Aug. 18, 1941. General comprehensive plan, Missouri River Basin. H. Doc. 238, 73rd Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 214, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc 426, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc 426, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 475, and S. Does. 191 and 247, 78th Cong., 2d Sess. PICK-SLOAN MISSOURI BASIN PROGRAM (OMAHA DIST.) (See Section 19 of Text) June 28, 1938 Adopted general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $9 million for initiation and partial accomplishment Aug 18, 1941 Modified general comprehensive plan to include Harlan County Dam and Reservoir on Republican River, NE, and authorized additional $7 million Dec 22, 1944 Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized additional $200 million. July 24, 1946 Authorized additional $150 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. May 17, 1950 Authorized additional $250 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Sep 3, 1954 Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized additional $217,710,000. Sep 3, 1954 Authorized $5,384,014 to compensate Sioux Indians for reservation lands required for Oahe South Dakota project. May 2, 1956 Modified general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin by deletion of construction of Red Willow Dam and Reservoir, NE, and addition of construction of Wilson Dam and Reservoir, KS. July 3, 1958 July 14, 1960 Dec 30, 1963 June 18, 1965 Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized additional $200 million. Authorized additional $207 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Authorized additional $80 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and modified the plan to include work protection and rectification works below Garrison Dam Authorized additional $116 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 842, 76th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 475, and S. Does. 191 and 247,78th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Does. 549 and 642, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 409, 84th Cong., 2d Sess. 21-14 Aug 30, 1935 Mar 2, 1945 Aug 18, 1941 Dec 22, 1944 Dec 22, 1944 OMAHA, NE, DISTRICT TABLE 21-C (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents May 12, 1967 Authorized additional $20 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Aug 13, 1968 Authorized additional $38 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. June 19, 1970 Authorized additional $109 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Dec 24, 1970 Change comprehensive plan name to Pick-Sloan Missouiri Basin Program Dec 23, 1971 Aitthorized additional $101 million for prosecution of Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program. Mar 7, 1974 Authorized additional $72 million for prosecution of Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program. July 8, 1976 Authorized additional $85 million for prosecution of Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program. Nov 16, 1977 Authorized additional $59 million for prosecution of Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program. H. Doc. 91--748 and S. Doc. 91-895. S. Doc. 91-1100, 91st Cong., 2d Sess. Aug 18, 1941 Dec 22, 1944 May 17, 1950 May 12, 1967 Aug 13, 1968 June 19, 1970 Dec 23, 1971 Mar 7, 1974 July 8, 1976 Nov 16, 1977 MISSOURI RIVER LEVEE SYSTEM, IA, NE, KS, AND MO. (See Section 17 of Text) Levees along both sides of river from Sioux City, IA to Kansas City, MO. Extended project from Kansas City, MO to mouth and provided for increased protection. SOUTH PLATTE RIVER BASIN, CO. (See Section 24 of Text) Adopted plan of improvement for South Platte River Basin and authorized $26.3 million for initiation and partial accomplishment. Authorized additional $2 million for prosecution of plan. Authorized additional $12 million for prosecution of plan and Bear Creek Lake. Authorized additional $21 million for prosecution of plan. Authorized additional $37 million for prosecution of plan. Authorized additional $15 million for prosecution of plan. Authorized additional $22 million for prosecution of plan. Authorized additional $3 million for prosecution of plan. H. Doc. 821, 76th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 475, 78th Cong., 2d Sess. S. Does, 191 and 247, 78th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 669, 80th Cong., 2d Sess. TABLE 21-D OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Full Report Cost to September 30, 1981 See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Missouri River, Sioux City, IA to Fort Benton, MT I 1948 3,123,141 644,863 Small Navigation Project at Sioux City, IA1 1970 129,500 46,100 1. Complete 21-15 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 21-E MISSOURI RIVER LEVEE SYSTEM (See Section 17 of Text) Miles of Unit Levee Status L627-624 Mosquito Creek Levee 14.2 Complete 1950 L601 Watkins-Waubonsie Ditch Levees 15.0 Complete 1966 L594 Pleasant Valley Levee 11.4 Complete 1964 R580 Nebraska City Levee 0.2 Complete 1950 L575 Thbrman-Hamburg Levee 45.8 Complete 1950 R573 Otto County Drainage District No. 2 5.9 Complete 1950 R562 Peru Dike 7.6 Complete 1950 L561-550 Atchison County Levee District No. 1 41.3 Complete 1952 R548 Brownville-Nemaha Levee 19.5 Complete 1952 L536 Mill Creek Levee 13.6 Complete 1952 R520 Richardson County Drainage Dist. No. 8 6.3 Complete 1960 R613 Papillion Creek-Platte River Levee 14.0 Complete 1971 R616 Bellevue-Papillion Creek Levees 4.5 Under Court Injunction L611-614 Mosquito-Keg Creek Levees 22.0 Under Construction L627, L624, L561-550 Remedial Studies on Completed Units Studies Underway TABLE 21-F MISSOURI RIVER, SIOUX CITY, IA TO RULO, NE TERMINAL FACILITIES (See Section 2 of Text) As of September 30, 1981 Miles Above Description of Facility Mouth Bank Nearest Town Sioux City Municipal Dock 731.4 Left Sioux City, IA Kay Dee Feed Co. 731.2 Left Sioux City, IA Big Soo Terminal Dock 727.8 Left Sioux City, IA Jebro Inc. 727.5 Left Sioux City, IA Flavorland Industries 727.0 Left Sioux City, IA Terra Chemical International 718.7 Left Sioux City, IA Farmland Soya Processing 717.0 Left Sioux City, IA Pilus Transfer Point 680.6 Left Blenco, IA Consolidated Blenders Inc. 648.2 Right Blair, NE Agrico Chemical Co. 647.7 Right Blair, NE Far-Mar-Co. 624.8 Right Omaha, NE Penzien, Inc. 624.5 Right Omaha, NE Missouri Portland Cement Co. 624.2 Right Omaha, NE Cargo Carriers, Inc. 624.0 Right Omaha, NE Greater Omaha Marina 617.9 Right Omaha, NE Omaha Municipal Dock, Sioux City & New Orleans (Cargill Molasses) 616.3 Right Omaha, NE Farmland Industries 614.5 Left Council Bluffs, IA Cargill Inc. 614.4 ILeft Council Bluffs, IA Terminal Packaging Corp. 614.1 Left Council Bluffs, IA 21-16 OMAHA, NE, DISTRICT MISSOURI RIVER, SIOUX CITY, IA TO RULO, NE TERMINAL FACILITIES (See Section 2 of Text) TABLE 21-F (Continued) As of September 30, 1981 Miles Above Description of Facility Mouth Bank Nearest Town National Molasses 612.2 Right Omaha, NE Allied Chemical Corp. 595.3 Right LaPlatte, NE Plattsmouth Municipal Dock 591.6 Right Plattsmouth, NE Far-Mar-Co. 584.5 Right Rock Bluff, NE Steinhart Terminal 562.6 Right Nebraska City, NE Nebraska City Municipal Dock 562.4 Right Nebraska City, NE Bartlett Grain Co. 562.4 Right Nebraska City, NE Nebco, Inc. Terminal Dock 562.3 Right Nebraska City, NE Consolidated Blenders Inc. 561.8 Right Nebraska City, NE Continental Grain Co. 535.5 Right Brownville, NE Kentopp Grain Co. Terminal 535.2 Right Brownville, NE Quad State Terminal Inc. 503.0 Left Mound City, MO PICK-SLOAN MISSOURI BASIN PROGRAM TABLE 21-G (See Section 19 of Text) Estimated Estimated Project Federal Cost Non-Federal Cost Garrison Dam, Lake Sakakawea, ND 1 300,745,341 687,000 Missouri River Levee System, IA, NE, KS and MO (Sioux City, IA to Rulo, NE)1 ,3 37,400,000 4,600,000 Oahe Dam-Lake Oahe SD and ND 1 345,146,204 - Big Bend Dam-Lake Sharpe, SD1 ,2 107,449,597 - Fort Randall Dam, Lake Francis Case, SD 1 ,2 198,797,140 720,000 Gavins Point Dam, Lewis & Clark Lake, SD & NE1 ,2 49,393,550 Gavins Point Dam, Lewis & Clark Lake, SD & NE-Relocation of Niobrara, NE 2 13,516,459 - Omaha, NE 2 5,903,640 362,000 Council Bluffs, IA 2 2,557,680 145,800 Missouri River. Garrison Dam to Lake Oahe, NDI 9,400,000 270,000 1Details presented on individual report. 2 Completed. 3 Active portion of project. 21-17 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 INSPECTION OF COMPLETED LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS TABLE 21-H (See Section 25 of Text) Location Month Inspected Montana Glasgow, Milk River Jun 81 Saco, Beaver Creek Jun 81 Havre, Milk River Sep 81 Havre, Scott Coulee-Bull Hook Dam Sep 81 Clyde Park, Shields River May 81 Three Forks, Lower Madison River May 81 Forsythe, Yellowstone River May 81 West Glendive, Yellowstone River May 81 Vaughn, Sun River Sep 81 *Yellowstone River, Water Plant, Livingston May 81 *Yellowstone River, Reedpoint Bridge May 81 *Yellowstone River, Greycliff Bridge May 81 *Yellowstone River, Springdale Bridge Apr 80 *Yellowstone River, Near Miles City Water Intake & Sewage Lagoon Apr 80 *Yellowstone River, Bank Protection, Billings May 81 *Yellowstone River, Yellowstone Co. Bridge, Near Billings May 81 *Yellowstone River, Voges Bridge, Near Big Timber May 81 *Jefferson River, Willow Creek Bridge, Near Three Forks May 81 *Jefferson River, Bank Protection, Near Waterloo May 81 *Big Hole River, Pennington Bridge, Near Twin Bridges May 81 *Ruby River, Wheatly Bridge, Near Twin Bridges May 81 *Big Horn River, Two Leggin Bridge, Near Hardin Apr 80 *Missouri River, Bank Stabilization, Fort Benton Sep 81 Wyoming Greybull, Big Horn River Aug 81 Sheridan, Big and Little Goose Creeks Aug 81 *Shoshone River, Bank Protection, Lovell Aug 81 North Dakota Williston Jun 81 Mandan, Lower Heart River Jun 81 Marmarth, Little Missouri River Jun 81 Scranton, Buffalo Jun 81 South Dakota Sioux Falls, Big Sioux River Apr 81 Belle Fourche, Belle Fourche River Sep 81 Rapid City, Cedar Canyon Dam Sep 81 Hot Springs, Fall River Channel Sep 81 21-18 OMAHA, NE, DISTRICT INSPECTION OF COMPLETED LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS TABLE 21-H (Continued) (See Section 25 of Text) Location Month Inspected Herreid, Spring Creek Jul 81 *Missouri River, Bank Protection, Greenwood Jul 81 *Bad River, Bank Protection, Fort Pierre May 81 *Big Sioux River, Schofield Bridge, Near Flandreau Jul81 *Big Sioux River, Fink Bridge, Near Flandreau Jul 81 Rapid Creek, Rapid City Sep 81 Sacred Heart Hospital, Yankton May 81 Colorado Aurora, Westerly Creek-Kelley Road Dam Sep 81 *Plum Creek, Bank Stabilization, Aurora Sep 81 *South Platte River, Bank Protection, Denver Sep 81 *Cache La Poudre River, Ft. Collins Sep 81 Nebraska Omaha, Missouri River May 81 Waterloo, Elkhorn River Jul 81 West Point, Elkhorn River Apr 81 Pierce, Elkhorn River Mar 81 Clarkson, Middle Fork, Maple Creek Apr 81 Hooper, Elkhorn River Apr 81 Norfolk, North Fork, Elkhorn River Aug 81 Madison, Union & Taylor Creeks Jun 81 *Platte River, M.U.D. Protection, Cedar Island May 81 *Platte River, Bank Protection, Louisville Apr 81 *Elkhorn River, Q Street Bridge, Near Gretna Apr 81 *Elkhorn River, Ray Bridge, Near Norfolk Mar 81 *North Platte River, Bank Stabilization, Minatare Sep 81 *Logan Creek, Bank Protection, Near Bancroft Mar 81 *Battle Creek, Bank Protection, Battle Creek Mar 81 Schuyler, Platte River Mar 81 Schuyler, Lost Creek & Platte River Mar 81 Little Papillion, Little Papillion Creek Mar 81 Gering Valley, Gering Drain & Tributaries Sep 81 Macy. Blackbird Creek Sep 81 Lincoln, Salt Creek & Tributaries Sep 81 Meadow Grove, Buffalo Creek Mar 81 Columbus, Loup River Mar81 Broken Bow, Mud Creek Apr 81 *Tangeman, Little Nemaha River Mar 81 *Julian, Rock Creek Mar 81 Iowa Council Bluffs, Missouri River Aug 81 Ida Grove, Maple River-Odebolt Creek May 81 21-19 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 INSPECTION OF COMPLETED LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS TABLE 21-H (Continued) (See Section 25 of Text) Location Month Inspected Sioux City, Floyd River Hawarden, Dry Creek Red Oak, Nishnabotna River Hamburg L575, Nishnabotna River Intercounty D.D., Little Sioux River Nagel D.D., Little Sioux River Bennett-McDonald-Smithland D.D., Little Sioux River *West Nishnabotna River, Mills Co. Bridge, Near Malvern *West Nishnabotna River, Mills Co. Bridge, Near Hastings *East Nishnabotna River, Page Co. Bridge, Near Essex *Missouri River, Marina, Sioux City *West Nishnabotna River, Near Hancock *East Nishnabotna River, Near Griswold Missouri River Levees L624 & L627, Mosquito Creek & Sieck Levees L601, Watkins Levee District L601, Miller-Sturgeon Levee District L601, Missouri River Levee District #1 L594, Waubansie Drainage District L594, Pleasant Valley Levee District L575, Benton-Washington Levee District L575, Northwest Atchison Levee District L575, McKissock Island Levee District L575, Buchannan Levee District L561, L550, L536, Atchison County Levee District R613, Sarpy Co. Soil & Water Cons. D. R562, Peru Levee District R548, Brownville-Nemaha Levee District R548, Little Nemaha Levee District R520, Richardson Co. Levee Dist. #8 R573, Otoe County Drainage Dist. #2 Aug 81 Jul81 Apr 81 Mar 81 Aug 81 Aug 81 Aug 81 Aug 81 Jan 81 Jan 81 Jun 81 Jan 81 Apr 81 Aug 81 Jul81 Sep 81 Aug 81 Sep 81 Sep 81 Jul 81 Jul 81 Jul 81 Jul 81 Aug 81 Mar 81 Sep 81 Aug 81 Sep 81 Sep 81 Aug 81 *Denotes Section 14 Projects OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS TABLE 21-I (See Section 27 of Text) For Last Full Report Cost to September 30, 1981 See Annual- Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Belle Fourche, Cheyenne River, SD 1 1940 37,410 Billings, MT 3 1976 25,310 - Blackbird Creek Near Macy, NE 2 , 6 1970 262,479 - 21-20 OMAHA, NE, DISTRICT OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS TABLE 21-I (Continued) (See Section 27 of Text) For Last Full Report Cost to September 30, 1981 See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Boulder Creek, Boulder, CO3 1976 142,866 - Buffalo Creek, Meadow Grove, NE 2 , 6 1974 293,016 - Buffalo Creek, Scranton, ND 5 1960 102,980 - Castlewood Lake Cherry Creek and Tributaries, CO3 1943 - - City of Aurora, Westerly Creek, CO2 1955 150,000 - Clarkson, NE, Maple Creek2 1967 191,282 - Council Bluffs, IA (Act of 1936) 1939 - - Council Bluffs, IA (Act of 1944)2 1954 2,557,680 - Davids Creek Lake, IA (Act of 1968)3 1972 - - Dayton, WY5 1956 - - Dry Creek, Hawarden, IA 2 1964 400,000 - Eagle Bay and Fort Yates Highway Bridges, N.D.3 1978 616,639 East Nishnabotna River, Red Oak, IA 2 , 6 1963 400,000 - Floyd River, Sioux City, IA 2 1970 11,556,667 - Forsyth, MT 2 1950 255,177 - Gavins Point Dam-Lewis and Clark Lake Relocation of Niobrara, NE2 1980 13,516,459 - Gering Valley, NE 2 1971 5,989,663 Giles Creek, Elkhorn, NE 5 1952 - - Glasgow, MT2 1939 16,832 - Greybull, WY2 1960 248,507 - Havre, MT2 1958 1,825,881 - Herreid, Spring Creek, SD2 1954 50,216 - Hooper, NE 2 , 6 1968 326,667 - Ida Grove, IA 2 , 6 1972 522,344 - Jamestown Reservoir, ND 2 1950 - - Linton, ND 3 , 6 1973 - - Little Papillion Creek, NE 2 1976 3,643,111 - Little Nemaha River, NE 3 1973 - - Little Sioux River and Tributaries, IA2 1970 15,482,920 - Loup River, Columbus, NE 2 6 1973 1,000,000 - Lower Big Sioux River, IA and SD3 1966 - - Lower Heart River, ND 2 1964 1,961,173 - McCook Lake, SD2 1958 147,627 - Madison, NE, Union and Taylor Creeks2 , 6 1967 234,839 - Mandan, Heart River, ND 2 1960 676,916 - Marmarth, ND 2 1960 169,498 - Miles City, MT 1956 - - Missouri River, Aten, NE 2 1951 578,791 - Missouri River, Niobrara, NE 2 1945 99,370 5,633 Morrison, Bear Creek, CO5 1950 - - Mott, ND 4 - Mud Creek, Broken Bow, NE 2 , 6 1976 1,000,000 - Nishnabotna River at Hamburg, IA 2 1948 236,000 - 21-21 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS TABLE 21-I (Continued) (See Section 27 of Text) For Last Full Report Cost to September 30, 1981 See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Norfolk, NE 2 1971 3,400,504 - Omaha, NE 2 1954 5,903,640 - Pierce, NE 2 1967 296,597 - Platte River Near Schuyler, NE 2 , 6 1948 74,940 - Platte River and Lost Creek, Schuyler, NE 2 1971 257,398 - Red Dale Gulch, Rapid City, SD2 1960 120,482 - Saco, MT 2 1958 67,793 - Sacred Heart Hospital, Yankton, SD2 1978 184,380 - Shell Creek, NE 5 1962 - - Sheridan, WY2,3 1976 1,966,809 - Shields River, Near Clyde Park, MT2 , 6 1951 25,747 - Shoshone River, Lovell, WY2 1963 14,350 - Sioux Falls, SD2 1966 5,288,707 - Vaughn, MT, Sun River2, 6 1971 451,582 - South Platte River Levees and Channel Improvements, Chatfield Lake to Ft. Morgan, CO 3 1957 Waterloo, NE 2 1970 237,883 - West Point, NE 2 1966 149,596 - Yellowstone River, W. Glendive, MT2 1960 230,294 - 1. Completed as a Public Works Administration project. 4. Deferred. 2. Project Complete. 5. Deauthorized. 3. Inactive. 6. Authorized by Chief of Engineers. FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION TABLE 21-J (See Section 28 of Text) Fiscal Year Study Cost (Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as Amended) (Preauthorization) Lost Creek, Columbus, NE Red Oak, IA-West Nishnabotna River Pender, NE-Logan Creek Pebble Creek, Scribner, NE Prairie and Silver Creek, Grand Island, NE Sidney, NE TOTAL 25,190 86,732 542 82,189 69,886 64,025 328,564 21-22 OHIO RIVER* For actual construction of locks and dams, and operation and care of completed structures, river is divided into three sections under immediate supervision and direction of district engineers at Pittsburgh, Huntington and Louisville. Pittsburgh section extends 127 miles from head of river at Pittsburgh, Pa., to a point immediately upstream from New Martinsville, W. Va., and includes Emsworth, Dashields, Montgomery, New Cumberland, Pike Island and Hannibal locks and dams. Huntington section extends 311 miles from mile 12, to 438 immediately upstream from Foster, Ky., and includes Willow Island, Belleville, Racine, Gallipolis, Greenup and Captain Anthony Meldahl locks and dams. Louisville section extends 543 miles from mile 438 to mouth of river, and includes Markland and McAlpine locks and dams (with Louisville and Portland Canal) Cannelton, Newburgh, Uniontown and Smithland locks and dams and locks and dams 52 and 53. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Construction of locks and dams on Ohio River .22-1 1. CONSTRUCTION OF LOCKS AND DAMS ON OHIO RIVER Location. Ohio River is formed by junction of Allegheny and Monongahela Rivers at Pittsburgh, Pa., and flows generally southwesterly for 981 miles to join Mississippi River near Cairo, Ill. For description of river see page 1227, 1932 Annual Report. Previous projects. For details see page 1907 of Annual Report for 1915. Existing project. Provides for improvement of entire river by construction of locks and dams to provide a channel depth of 9 feet and for widening Louisville and Portland Canal at Louisville, Ky. Project provides for a lock with usable dimensions of 110 by 600 feet at each of the dams and, in addition, an auxiliary lock 56 by 360 feet is available at Emsworth, Dashields, Montgomery, and McAlpine locks and dams with an auxiliary lock at Gallipolis being 110 by 360 feet. Dashields is a fixed dam, while Emsworth, Montgomery, and Gallipolis are fixed dams with movable crests. Remaining dams are movable type, with navigable pass varying in width from 600 to 1,248 feet. In addition to navigable pass, movable-type dams are also provided with one or more regulating weirs. At McAlpine locks and dam a canal (Louisville, and Portland) extends along left bank for 2 miles, with locks at lower end. Modifications to existing project under purview of Section 6, March 3, 1909 Act, provide for fixed dams with movable crests with two locks (110 by 1,200 feet and 110 by 600 feet) at New Cumberland, Pike Island, Hannibal, Willow Island, Belleville, Racine, Greenup, Captain Anthony Meldahl, Markland, Cannelton, Newburgh and Uniontown, two locks 110 by 1,200 feet at Smithland, 110 by 1,200 foot temporary locks in addition to the existing locks at locks and dams 52 and 53, and reconstruction to provide a 110 by 1,200 foot lock in addition to existing locks and a fixed 2. Open channel work, Ohio River 22-3 dam with two sections of movable crest at McAlpine locks and dam, widening Louisville and Portland Canal to 500 feet. Rehabilitation of existing locks and dams 52 and 53 was started in September 1979 under the purview of Section 6, March 1909 Act. Mound City was also considered authorized under purview of 1909 Act, and preconstruction planning was performed in the period 1965 to 1972. The ruling of the U.S. District Court, District of Columbia, on September 6, 1974, with reference to Lock and Dam 26, Mississippi River, would also apply to this project. Consequently, it is no longer considered authorized. Operation and care of locks and dams were included in project July 1, 1935, under provisions of Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act of June 26, 1934. Estimated Federal cost of new work (existing project)(1981), exclusive of Gallipolis locks and dam reported under Kanawha River project is $1,760,630,040, estimated non-Federal cost is $14,999,000. Foregoing estimate does not include expenditures on previous projects. Various items previously included in this project are considered inactive or unnecessary and are excluded from foregoing cost estimate. See page 693, Annual Report, 1968 for items and estimated cost. Under authority of 1910 River and Harbor Act. Louisville and Portland Canal was widened to 200 feet; locks and dams 40 and 42 eliminated; locks and dams 1 and 2 replaced by Emsworth locks and dam; lock and dam 3 replaced by Dashields locks and dam; and locks and dams 4, 5 and 6 replaced by Montgomery locks and dam. Locks and dams 24, 25 and 26 were replaced by Gallispolis locks and dam authorized by August 30, 1935 Act, and constructed under project for improving lower Kanawha River. Locks and dams 7, 8 and 9 were replaced by New Cumberland locks and dam, locks and dams 10 and 11 were replaced by Pike Island locks and dam, locks and dams 12, 13 and 14 were replaced by Hannibal locks and dam, locks and dams 15, 16 and 17 were replaced by Willow Island locks and dam, locks and dams 18, 19 and 20 were replaced by * All cost and financial statements and authorizing legislation for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at end of this chapter. 22-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 Belleville locks and dam, locks and dams 21, 22 and 23 were replaced by Racine locks and dam, locks and dams 27, 28, 29 and 30 were replaced by Greenup locks and dam, locks and dams 31, 32, 33 and 34 were replaced by Captain Anthony Meldahl locks and dam, locks and dams 35, 36, 37, 38 and 39 were replaced by Markland locks and dam, the Louisville and Portland Canal at McAlpine locks and dam was widened to 500 feet. Locks and dams 43, 44 and 45 were replaced by Cannelton locks and dam, presently under construction, locks and dams 46 and 47 were replaced by Newburgh locks and dam presently under construction, locks and dams 48 and 49 were replaced by Uniontown locks and dam presently under construction, and locks and dam 50 and 51 were replaced by Smithland locks and dam, presently under construction, as modifications to existing project under purview of Section 6, March 3, 1909 Act, reducing total number of structures to 20. Table 22-D contains data relative to various features of locks and dams included in existing project. For list of principal towns and cities along Ohio River with their mileage below Pittsburgh, Pa., see page 1060, 1962 Annual Report. See Table 22-C for licenses. Terminal facilities. Modern public terminals, with warehouses, equipped with operating machinery for transferring materials, have been constructed by private interests at some of the larger cities and towns. A list of terminals on Ohio River is revised annually and can be obtained from Division Engineer, U.S. Army Engineer Division, Ohio River, Cincinnati, Ohio. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work by contract and hired labor: Emsworth locks and dams (rehabilitation): $4,051,876 was expended during fiscal year 1981 for: real estate coordination, fabrication of miter gates, construction of mooring cells and engineering and design. Fabrication of upper and lower lock miter gates, 110-foot chamber, was completed in fiscal year 1981. The downstream gates were installed by hired labor in August and upper gates to be installed in October 1981. A contract awarded in December 1980 in the amount of $451,700 for construction of mooring cells upper and lower pools, was completed in September 1981. Bids were opened on 18 September for Locks and Dams Rehabilitation and a contract award is expected to be made by mid-October 1981. Hannibal locks and dam: Emergency remedial bank protection repairs were made to the sanitary interceptor sewer at Wheeling Island, WV in February 1981 at a cost of $22,675. A contract was awarded in June 1981 in the amount of $199,800 for extension of bank protection to the Wheeling Island interceptor sewer line and contract was completed in September 1981. Willow Island locks and dam: Construction initiated in January 1967 is complete except for recreation facilities and visitors center at the locks site. A total of $102,335 was expended during the fiscal year for channel dredging and engineering studies. Belleville locks and dam: Construction work complete except for additional recreation facilities under the completed projects program. During the period $186,882 was expended under recreation at completed projects. Racine locks and dam: Construction initiated in June 1964 is complete except for additional recreation facilites under the completed projects program. During the period $29,448 was expended under recreation at completed projects. Gallipolis locks and dam: The existing project, constructed under project for improving lower Kanawha River, was placed in operation in August 1937. The dimensions of the existing lock chambers and poor approach conditions, particularly to downstream traffic, have created a higher than normal accident rate to the structure with corresponding hazards and delays to traffic. The Water Resources Development Act of 1976 authorized Phase I AE&D studies for a single 1,200 foot lock in a by-pass canal. These studies are underway. Greenup locks and dam: Construction work complete except for additional recreation facilites under the completed projects program. Captain Anthony Meldahl locks and dam: Construction work complete except for additional recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Markland locks and dam: Project is complete including a public highway bridge across the navigation structure, as authorized by the Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1970 (Public Law 91-606). For details of bridge see page 22-3 of Annual Report for 1978. McAlpine locks and dam: Project is complete except for alteration of lift section of railroad bridge that spans the upper end of the Louisville and Portland canal which work is presently deferred. Cannelton locks and dam: Project remained at 99 percent complete. Land acquisition complete except for continuing action of Declaration of Taking on one tract. Two contracts for addition to the service building and archeological investigations of a recreation site were completed. Contract for rehabilitation of a boat ramp advanced to 97 percent completion. Engineering and design of remaining project features, including modification of hoist drum shaft; $195,704. Newburgh locks and dam: The Newburgh Bank Protection Works project was combined with the locks and dam project by the Water Resourced Development Act of 1974. Project remained at 99 percent complete. Two contracts for remote control building and addition to the service building were completed. Contract for centralized control and serveillance system modified to include installation of additional cameras, investigation and repair of storm damage and extended warranty, advanced to 87 percent completion. Engineering and design of remaining project features including modification of hoist shaft, continued; $126,555. Uniontown locks and dam: Project is 99 percent complete. Land acquisition advanced to 99 percent completion while boundary line marking remained at 94 percent complete. Four contracts for boat ramp roads and parking areas and chemical toilets at three recreation sites and addition to the service building were completed. Contracts for landscaping and miscellaneous items at three recreation sites, awarded in February 1981 and October 1981 respectively, were completed. Two contracts for boat ramps, road and parking areas at two recreation sites were awarded in March and May 1981 and advanced to 99 and 26 percent completion, respectively. Engineering and design of remaining project features including modifications of hoist drum shaft, continued; $996,197. Smithland locks and dam: Project is 94 percent complete. Land acquisition continued and advanced to 95 percent completion. Five contracts for relocation of Illinois county roads, relocation of a railroad, relocation of two utilities remedial work on access road to Golconda, Illinois water intake structure, and one supply contract for maintenance bulkheads were completed. No progress was made on two utility relocation contracts. Work continued on electric utility relocation contract and advanced to 80 percent completion. Work on the dam was completed in November 1980, however final payment has not been made pending final settlement of all claims. Supply contract for fabrication of four mooring bit extensions was awarded in August 1981. Contract for remedial work on Golconda, Illinois water intake structure was awarded in May 1981 and advanced to 79 percent completion. Two contracts for landscaping service mound and installation of mooring facilities were awarded in May 1981 and were completed. Two contracts for 22-2 OHIO RIVER removal of rock dike and painting dam tainter gates and bulkheads were awarded in September 1981. Navigation pool was raised to final level in November 1980. Lock and Dam 51 was deactivated 25 September 1980 and removed 30 October 1980. Lock and Dam 50 was deactivated 3 November 1980 and removed 9 December 1980. Engineering and design of remaining project features continued; $10,916,572. Lock and Dam No. 53 (Temporary Lock): Project is 99 percent complete. Contract for construction of the temporary lock including work at the old dam and channel dredging was completed. Engineering and design related to construction continued; $341,865. Locks and Dam No. 52 (Rehabilitation): Project is 16 percent complete. Two supply contracts for miter gate machinery and for filling and emptying valves and equipment and two construction contracts for restoring lockwall rails and modification of wastewater disposal system were completed. Four supply contracts for wicket assemblies and hurters were awarded (three in January and one in May 1981) and advanced to 35 percent completion. One supply contract for fabrication of miter gates was awarded in July 1981 and advanced to 12 percent completion. Hired labor repair of beartraps, leaves and installation of machinery started in May 1981 and advanced to 12 percent completion. Engineering and design of remaining project features continued; $1,366,336. Locks and Dam No. 53 (Rehabilitation): Project is 17 percent complete. Two supply contracts for miter gate machinery and for filling and emptying valves and equipment were completed. Four supply contracts for wicket assemblies and hurters were awarded (three in January and one in May 1981) and advanced to 35 percent completion. One supply contract for fabrication of miter gate was awarded in July 1981 and advanced to 13 percent completion. Contract for restoring lockwall rails was awarded in August 1981. Engineering and design of remaining project features continued; $930,470. Operation and maintenance, general. Locks and dams operated as required and necessary repairs and improvements made thereto and to operator's quarters, grounds and esplanades. Costs were $6,219,798 for Pittsburgh District, $7,694,786 for Huntington District and $9,680,274 "for Louisville District. Condition at end of fiscal year. Navigation system of 21 locks and dams is in operation and 9-foot navigation throughout length of river is generally available at all times. At certain unstable bars project depth is maintained by dredging, supplemented by contraction works. (See "Open Channel Work, Ohio River.") Table 22-D shows cost and year completion of locks and dams now in operation. Existing project does not provide adequate facilities for present day navigation due to obsolescence of structures. Since repair and modernization of these facilities would be extremely costly, replacement and reconstruction is being accomplished as rapidly as funds are made available for the purpose. Construction of lock and dam replacement program was initiated in fiscal year 1955. New Cumberland, Pike Island, Hannibal, Willow Island, Belleville, Racine, Greenup, Captain Anthony Meldahl, Markland, McAlpine, Cannelton, Newburgh, Uniontown and Smithland replacement locks and dams are in operation, replacing 39 old low-lift locks and dams. for total cost of existing project, see Table 22-B. 2. OPEN CHANNEL WORK, OHIO RIVER Location. Under jurisdiction of district engineer in whose district the work is located. Portion of river included in project extends 974.7 miles from head of river at Pittsburgh, Pa., to mouth of Cache River (Mound City, Ill.). Open channel improvement from mouth of Cache River to mouth of Ohio River is under jurisdiction of Mississippi River Commission. Existing project. Before completion of canalization project, no project depth had been fixed by Congress under project for open channel work, but in order to properly aid packet and barge navigation it was necessary to secure a low-water channel with a minimum depth of from 4 to 6 feet, and a width, depending upon difficulty of running channel, of from 400-600 feet; also to permit movement of large coal tows, which movement occurred at stages of water exceeding 10 feet, it was necessary to remove points of projecting bars which formed at various locations along river. Accomplishment of this purpose involved concentration of current by closing back channels at islands with low dams, contraction and straightening wide; open channels by low dikes, dredging bars and shoals, and removal of snags and wrecks. Incidental to direct improvement of Ohio River is construction and maintenance of ice piers as required for protection of river craft. Stage of extreme high water on Ohio River varies from 46 feet at Pittsburgh, Pa., to 80 feet at Cincinnati, Ohio, with 57.2 feet at Louisville, Ky. (head of falls), 53.8 feet at Evansville, Ind., and 59.5 feet at Cairo, Ill. (mouth of river). Estimated cost of new work (1960) is $16,160,000, exclusive of following items which are considered inactive: Ice piers authorized by 1927 River and Harbor Act; reforestation of sloughs on Kentucky Peninsula near Evansville, Ind., authorized by 1930 River and Harbor Act; dredging to widen channel at certain points; and placing revetment at various points. Estimated cost of these items (1954) is $6,565,000. Operation of snag boats on Ohio River below Pennsylvania State line was included in project July 1, 1935, under provisions of Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act of June 26, 1934. See Table 22-E for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. River and Harbor Act of January 21, 1927, authorizing construction of ice piers for general open channel work, imposes condition that before work is begun on any pier, local interests convey to the United States free of cost such riparian rights as may be deemed necessary in connection with the improvement at locality (H. Doc. 187, 67th Cong., 2nd sess.). Existing ice piers are adequate for present purposes and local cooperation is not needed since no additional construction is under consideration. River and Harbor Act of July 3, 1930, provides for reforestation of sloughs of Kentucky Peninsula and bank protection and that no expense shall be incurred by the United States for acquiring lands required for purpose of this improvement (H. Doc. 409, 69th Cong., 1st sess.). However, since no serious overbank erosion has occurred since bank revetment in 1933-34, reforestation is not considered justifiable at this time and no local cooperation is required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Dredging was done where required to provide an adequate and dependable channel of project depth at minimum pool condition. Dikes and revetments were maintained and routine work of maintaining navigation aids, removing snags, making channel studies, hydrographic surveys and mapping was performed as required. Channel soundings, hydrographic surveys, stream gaging operations, channel inspections and aids to navigation, and miscellaneous inspections and reports cost $815,264. Dredging, by hired labor: Pittsburgh District 3,700 cubic yards at $94,489; Huntington District 1,575 cubic yards at $15,052. Dredging by contract: Huntington District 633,140 cubic yards at $366,702 and Louisville District 2,074,549 cubic yards at $2,485,085. Condition at end of fiscal year. New work under this project is substantially complete, since it is not anticipated that work on inactive portion of project will be accomplished. In addition to dredging, local stabilization of channel has been effected at various points by construction of dikes and revetment. Work which remains consists of dredging to widen channels at certain points to project depth. 22-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 22-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost to Section Sept. 30, In Text Project Funding FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 1981 1. Construction of New Work Locks and Dams Approp. 31,367,380 16,796,138 12,511,848 12,298,533 1,370,336,205 ... on Ohio River Cost 35,242,317 25,875,100 15,780,604 13,090,919 1,367,557,478' " 11 Maint. Approp. 18,808,189 23,462,979 24,895,869 22,960,200 429,178,230 4 Cost 19,172,349 22,980,531 24,027,531 23,594,858 428,769,8052 1 Rehab. Approp. - 640,000 1,924,000 8,709,000 11,273,000 Cost - 10,293 1,325,554 6,348,682 7,684,529 2. Open Channel New Work Work, Ohio River Approp. - - - - 15,962,260" Cost - - - 15,962,260" Maint. Approp. 4,179,587 4,790,351 4,252,076 4,345,200 83,995,263 Cost 4,386,370 4,217,049 4,654,642 3,776,592 82,903,219' y Rehab. Approp. - - - - 944,649 Cost - - - - 944,649 1. Includes $17,003,761 for previous 6-foot canalization under provisions of permanent indefinite appropriation for such project. purposes, and $267 transferred to project without reim- 2. Includes $36,943,217 expended from 1885 to 1937 on bursement. operation and care of work of improvement under provisions of 8. Includes $1,040,236 Public Works funds. permanent indefinite appropriations for such purposes. 9. Includes $1,000 for removal of obstructions in Licking 3. Includes $215,812 public works acceleration, execu- River under authority of Section 3, R&H Act of 1930. tive 1963. 10. Includes $100,000 placed in FY 1971 Budget Reserve. 4. Includes $38,766 public works acceleration, execu- 11. Excludes $3,899 transferred from project without reimtive 1963. bursement. 5. Excludes $251,785 contributed funds for new work. 12. Surplus property valued at $3,553 transferred to project 6. Excludes $250,118 contributed funds for new work. without reimbursement. 7. Excludes $1,621,349 expended in operation of snag boats 13. Excludes $2,140 transferred to project without reimbursement. CONSTRUCTION OF LOCKS AND DAMS ON OHIO RIVER TOTAL COST OF EXISTING PROJECT TO SEPTEMBER 30, 1981 TABLE 22-B (See Section 1 of Text) Operations and Maintenance, Funds New Work General Rehabilitation Total Regular 1,347,264,792 398,700,837 7,684,529 1,753,650,158 Public Works 3,258,368 - - 3,258,368 Emergency Relief 1,198,837 19,000 - 1,217,837 Maintenance & Operation - 2,249,099 - 2,249,099 'Public Works Acceleration 215,812 38,766 - 254,578 Executive 1963 Total 1,351,937,80915 401,007,702 "6 7,684,529 1,760,630,040 1. Excludes surplus property valued at $297,385 transferred permanent indefinite appropriation. to project without reimbursement. 5. Excludes $3,899 transferred from project without reim- 2. Excludes surplus property valued at $73,832 transferred bursement. to project without reimbursement. 6. Excludes $2,140 transferred to project without reim- 3. Excludes $250,118 contributed funds for new work. bursement. 4. Excludes $36,943,217 expended from 1885 to 1937 under 22-4 OHIO RIVER FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION LICENSES TABLE 22-C AT LOCKS AND DAMS, OHIO RIVER Markland Dam McAlpine Dam F.E.R.C. License 2,211 289:1,000 License Public Service Co. Louisville Gas and of Indiana Electric Co. Annual Charge $45,950.00 $95,000.00 Collections to end of Fiscal Year 1981 $641,411.64 $5,035,311.20 22-5 TABLE 22-D OHIO RIVER LOCKS AND DAMS (See Section 1 of Text) Lock Dimensions Upper Normal Greatest Pool Length Elevation Depth on Width Available (feet, Miter Sills Actual Cost Lock Miles of For Full mean Character of Foundation Year to Date of and Below Distance From Chamber Width Lift sea Upper Lower Percent Opened to Each Lock Dam Pittsburgh Nearest Town (feet) (feet) (feet) level) (feet) (feet) Lock Dam Complete Navigation and Dam 1. - Replaced - 6.2 Emsworth locks and dam, 110 Emsworth, Pa. 56 2. Replaced 3. - Replaced 13.3 Dashields locks and dam, 110 1.6 miles below 56 Sewickley, Pa. 4. - Replaced 5. Replaced 6. Replaced 31.7 Montogomery locks and dam, 110 1.4 miles above 56 Industry, Pa. 7. - Replaced 8. - Replaced 54.4 New Cumberland locks and 110 dam, Stratton, Ohio 110 9. - Replaced 10. - Replaced 11. - Replaced 84.3 Pike Island locks and dam, 110 2 miles upstream from 110 Warwood, W. Va. 12. - Replaced 13. - Replaced 14. - Replaced 126.4 Hannibal locks and dam, 1.6 miles upstream from 110 New Martinsville, W. Va. 110 15. - Replaced - 16 - Replaced 161.7 Willow Island locks and dam, 2.7 miles above 110 Waverly, W. Va. 110 600 18.0 710.0 17.0' ' 12.93 360 15.5 ' 12.9' 600 360 10.0 692.0 13.4' 17.5' Rock Rock and piles 100 Rock Rock 100 1929 600 360 17.5 682.0 16.0 14.6' Rock and piles Rock and piles 100 1.200 600 20.5 664.5 7.0 14.8' Rock Rock 100 1,200 600 17.8 644.0 17.0' 18.0' Rock Rock 100 - $ 870.034 1921 10,936,822' ' S 976,767 1.144,588 3,533,076 1,071,472 1,080.132 1,123,442 1936 5,737,611 1.075.000 1,167,456 1959 39.099.688 1,177.100 1,138,000 1.162,165 1968 56.623.946 1,166,104 1.222.389 1,133.371 1,200 600 21.0 623.0 38.0 17.0 Rock 1,200 600 20.0 602.0 35.0 15.0 Rock and piles Rock 99 1972 87.481.610 1.180.478 1.275.532 Rock 98 1972 76.156.(094 C O 0 0 y x C3 z CO I13 � to o TABLE 22-D OHIO RIVER LOCKS AND DAMS (Continued) (See Section 1 of Text) Lock Dimensions Upper Normal Greatest Pool Length Elevation Depth on Width Available (feet, Miter Sills Actual Cost Lock Miles of For Full mean Character of Foundation Year to Date of and Below Distance From Chamber Width Lift sea Upper Lower Percent Opened to Each Lock Dam Pittsburgh Nearest Town (feet) (feet) (feet) level) (feet) (feet) Lock Dam Complete Navigation and Dam 17. - Replaced 18. - Replaced 19. - Replaced 20. - Replaced 103.9 Belleville locks and dam, 110 0.3 mile below 110 Reedsville, Ohio 21. - Replaced 22. Replaced 23. - Replaced 237.5 Racine locks and dam, 110 1.5 miles below 110 Letart Falls, Ohio 24. - Replaced 25. Replaced 26. - Replaced 279.2 Gallipolis locks and dam, 110 0.7 mile below 110 Hogsett, W. Va. 27. Replaced 28. - Replaced 29. Replaced 30. Replaced 341.0 Greenup locks and dam, 110 4.9 miles below Greenup, Ky. 110 31. - Replaced 32. Replaced 33. Replaced 34. Replaced 436.2 Captain Anthony Meldahl 110 locks and dam, 2.2 miles 110 above Foster. Ky. 1,200 600 22.0 582.0 1,200 600 22.0 560.0 600 360 26.0 538.0 1.200 600 30.0 515.0 1,200 600 30.0 485.0 37.0 15.0' Rock and piles 18.0 15.0 Rock and piles $ 1,362,591 927,091 1,213,848 936,696 Rock 100 1968 62,473,529 1.484,562 1,218,798 1,851,488 Rock 98 1971 64,922,680 1.187.542 1.925.205 1.307.241 18.0 12.0 18.0' 13.0 Rock Rock 18.0' 15.0 Rock Rock 100 1937 2,015,601 1.063.133 1,088,802 1.579.618 Rock 100 1959 56.447.191 1,359.231 2,951,216 1.937.166 3.437,057 Rock 100 1962 74,188,216 O x C d t TABLE 22-D OHIO RIVER LOCKS AND DAMS (Continued) (See Section 1 of Text) Lock Dimensions Upper Normal Greatest Pool Length Elevation Depth on Width Available (feet, Miter Sills Actual Cost Lock Miles of For Full mean Character of Foundation Year to Date of and Below Distance From Chamber Width Lift sea Upper Lower Percent Opened to Each Lock Dam Pittsburgh Nearest Town (feet) (feet) (feet) level) (feet) (feet) Lock Dam Complete Navigation and Dam 35. Replaced 36. - Replaced 37. Replaced 38. Replaced 531.5 Markland locks and dam, 110 1 mile above Markland, Ind. 110 39 Replaced 40. Eliminated - 41. - - 604.0 McAlpine locks and dams 110 (Reconstruction of locks 110 and dam 41.) 56 43. Replaced 44 - Replaced 45 - Replaced 720.7 Cannelton locks and dam 110 3 miles above Cannelton, Ind. 110 46. Replaced 776.1 Newburgh locks and dam, 110 16 miles above 110 Evansville, Ind 47 Replaced 48 Replaced 49 Replaced 846.0 Uniontown locks and dam, 110 3.5 miles below 110 Uniontown, Ky 50 Replaced 51 - Replaced 918.5 Smithland locks and dam, 110 2 miles above 110 Smithland, Ky. 52 938 9 1 4 miles below Brookport, Ill. 110 938 9 1 4 miles below Brookport, Ill 110 (New Lock) 1,200 600 35.0 455.0 1,200 600 37.0 420.0 360 1,200 25.0 383.0 600 1,200 600 16.0 358.0 1,200 600 22 0 342.0 1,200 1,200 22 0 324.0 600 120 302.0 1,200 12.0 3020 50.0 15.0 49.0 12.0 19.0 11.0 19.0 11.0 38.0 13.0 32.0 16.0 34 0 12.0 34.0 12.0 15 4 11.0 154 110 Rock Rock Rock Rock Rock Rock Pile Pile $ 1,894,942 3,704,535 1,297,924 2,857,040 Piles 100 1963 63,019,403 2,222,448 Rock Rock 7,658,134' 100" 1961 42,726,189 2,592,252 2,819,930 3,202,890 99 1972 98,055,631" 3,129,028 Pile 98 1975 103,957,072 4,415,526 3,062,710 3,325,964 Rock 99 1975 99,302,775 3,751,762 4,370,566 Rock Pile Pile 93 1980 100 1928 100 1969 260,445,847 6,385,083 10,197,518 0 0O zO y C rr v " 1ID MW 1 OHIO RIVER LOCKS AND DAMS (See Section 1 of Text) Lock Dimensions Upper Normal Greatest Pool Length Elevation Depth on Width Available (feet, Miter Sills Actual Cost Lock Miles of For Full mean Character of Foundation Year to Date of and Below Distance From Chamber Width Lift sea Upper Lower Percent Opened to Each Lock Dam Pittsburgh Nearest Town (feet) (feet) (feet) level) (feet) (feet) Lock Dam Complete Navigation and Dam 53 962 6 10 8 miles above 110 600 13 4 290 0 15.4 9,6' Pile Pile 100 1929 $ 7,090,002 Mound City, Ill 962 6 10 8 miles above 110 1,200 134 290.0 15 4 96 Pile 98 36,832,888 Mound City. Ill. (New Lock) 974.2 Mound City locks and dam, 1 mile below Mound City. Ill - - - - - 1 539,490 54 974 2 Mound City, Ill. TOTAL $1,367,268,898" 1 Depths are on emergency dam foundation and are controlling depths 2 Change from fixed dam to lift-gate dam completed in 1938 3 Depths are on poiree dam foundation and are controlling depths 4 I,and chamber 5 River chamber 6 Roller-gate dam Cost not included in total Constructed under project for improving lower Kanawha River 7 I,ock and dam 41 completed with 110- by 600-foot lock in 1921 Completed with new dam and raised canal and lock wall in 1928 Auxiliary 56- by 360-foot lock constructed in 1929-30 Reconstruction and modernization began 1956, renamed McAlpine locks and dam in 1960 Operation of auxiliary lock suspended in 1971 8 Completed except for deferred alteration of railroad bridge 9 Dam below not yet constructed Depth on lower miter sill at lower water 10 Reflects reduction of $2,219,975 payment for settlement of damage to dam caused by barge accident in April 1978 11 Includes $1,552,807 for major rehabilitation project 12 Includes $1,056,665 for major rehabilitation project 13 For preconstruction planning 1965 to 1972 No longer considered authorized See Section 1 of text 14 Exclusive of $7,174,235, details below 15 Includes $5.075,057 for major rehabilitation initiated in FY 1980 Additional Features Entering into Cost of Project Louisville and Portland Canal and Indiana chute (under previous project) Examinations, survey contingencies, plants and miscellaneous Recreation facilities, pool area, Gallipolis locks and dams TOTAL GRAND TOTAI, $ 5,359,203 966,232 668,800 7,174,235 $1,374,443,133 TABLE 22-D (Continued) tC REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 22-E AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents OPEN CHANNEL WORK, OHIO RIVER (See Section 2 of Text) March 3, 1827 Project adopted by this act originally covered entire length of Ohio River from its mouth near Cairo to Pittsburgh, a distance of 981 miles. It provided for removal of all obstructions which tend to endanger steamboat navigation. Jan. 21, 1927 Construct ice piers as a part of project, with funds allotted H. Doc. 187, 67th Cong., 2nd sess. from appropriations for general open channel work. July 3, 1930 Reforestation of sloughs on Kentucky Peninsula near Evans- H. Doc. 409, 69th Cong., 1st sess. ville, Ind., and a 200-foot strip along upstream bank and for bank protection, at an estimated costs of $200,000. July 3, 1958 Act of Mar, 3, 1827 modified to include maintenance of exist- H. Doc. 434, 84th Cong., 2nd sess. ing Licking River Channel within lower 3-mile limit of River slack water, at an estimated increase of $1,000 in cost of average annual maintenance. 22-10 NASHVILLE, TENN., DISTRICT* This district comprises portions of southern Kentucky, southwestern Virginia, western North Carolina, northern Georgia and Alabama, northeastern Mississippi and practically all of Tennessee except western portion, and embraces drainage basins of Tennessee and Cumberland Rivers and their tributaries. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Cumberland River, Tenn. and Ky... 23-1 2. Tennessee River, Tenn., Ala., and K y . .................................................... 23-3 3. Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway, Alabama and Mississippi .............. 23-4 4. Other authorized navigation projects .. .............. .. ................... 23-5 5. Navigation work under special authorization ............... .... ... ... 23-5 Alteration of Bridges 6. Authorized Alteration of Bridges._ 23-5 Flood Control 7. Big South Fork National River and Recreation Area, Ky. and .Tenn. . ..........-...... ... .. .... _.. ........ . 23-5 8. Martins Fork Lake, Ky ........... 23-5 9. Middlesboro, Cumberland River Basin, Ky ..................................... 23-6 10. Tug and Levisa Forks of the Big Sandy River and Cumberland River, W. Va., Va., and Ky ............ 23-6 11. Ohio River Basin (Nashville D ist.) ....-..................... ...... 23-7 12. Inspection of completed flood control projects ............................ 23-7 Navigation 1. CUMBERLAND RIVER, TENN. AND KY. Location. Formed by junction of Poor and Clover Forks in Harlan County, Ky., about 694.2 miles above its mouth, and flows west to Burnside, Ky., from whence it makes a loop southwestward into Tennessee, passes Nashville, and returns northwestward to Kentucky, emptying into Ohio River near Smithland, Ky. (See Geological Survey base maps of Tennessee and Kentucky.) Previous projects. For details see pages 1898 and 1901 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1208 of Annual Report for 1938. 13. Flood Control (Cont) Other authorized flood control Page projects ....................... 23-7 14. Flood control work under special authorization ....... . ........ ...... 23-7 15. Streambank Erosion Control Evaluation and Demonstration Act of 1974 ......-..... .. .. ... 23-7 Multiple-Purpose Power Projects 16. Center Hill Lake, Ohio River Basin, Tenn. ----------------......................... 23-7 17. Dale Hollow Lake, Ohio River Basin, Tenn. and Ky ........ .... 23-8 18. J. Percy Priest Dam and Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, Tenn. ..::. ....... ..... ... ............ . 23-8 19. Laurel River Lake, Ohio River Basin, Ky. .......... 23-9 20. Wolf Creek Dam-Lake Cumberland, Ohio River Basin, Ky. ..................... 23-9 21. Other authorized multiplepurpose power projects ......... 23-10 General Investigations 22. Surveys ........................ ............ . 23-10 23. Collection and study of basic data_. 23-10 Existing project. Below Nashville: For information concerning construction of locks and dams A, B, C, D, E and F, required dredging and related costs to secure 6 foot navigation, see pages 1069 and 1070 of Annual Report for 1962. Improvement of Cumberland River between mouth and Nashville was authorized for 9-foot navigation; increased project depth to be obtained by construction of three moderate height dams with lockage facilities, designated as Kuttawa (Eureka), Dover, and Cheatham, to replace existing locks A to F inclusive below Nashville and lock 1 above Nashville. (See table 23-B for authorizing legislation.) Subsequent authorities provided for construction of hydro- *All cost and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 23-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 electric power-generating facilities at Cheatham Dam, river mile 148.7, and modification of project for navigation on Cumberland River, Tenn. and Ky., to provide, in lieu of previously authorized works at Kuttawa, mile 32.2, and Dover, mile 100.1, for construction of a multiple- purpose improvement consisting of a dam, lock, and powerplant near mile 30.6 on lower Cumberland River and a canal for navigation and other purposes connecting this reservoir with reservoir formed by Kentucky Dam on the Tennessee River. The project is known as Barkley Dam and Lake Barkley. Provision of interconnecting canal, involving excavation of a channel through narrow watershed divide about 2.5 miles upstream from damsite, permits alternative routes available for navigation between either Cumberland or Tennessee Rivers and Ohio River, and affords integrated operation of Barkley and Kentucky Reservoirs through diversion of flows in interests of flood control and power production. Estimated cost of modified project for 9-foot navigation and multiple-purpose development is $178,515,700 Federal funds and $102,966 non-Federal funds for recreation facilities under the completed projects program (October 1981). (See table 23-C for listing of principal features.) Under flood conditions as regulated by upstream reservoirs, extreme fluctuation in stage of river below Nashville, Tenn., varies at different localities from about 16 to 55 feet above minimum pool levels. Ordinary fluctuations vary with power flows from as much as the allowable 3-foot drawdown below normal pool elevation 385 at Cheatham Lock and Dam to a range of about 7 feet at Nashville. Seasonal variation in normal headwater levels at Lake Barkley is 5 feet, which in combination with power flows produces fluctuations up to 10 feet below Cheatham Lock and Dam. Above Nashville: See pages 1693 thru 1696 of Annual Report for 1950 for information including statistical data on locks and dams 1 to 17 and 21. Completion information is shown on pages 1454 of the report for 1951. See Table 23- B for Authorizing Legislation. Construction of Old Hickory, Carthage, and Celina Dams above Nashville was also authorized for navigation and power. The dam and reservoir authorized for construction on Cumberland River near Carthage, Tenn., has been redesignated as Cordell Hull Dam and Reservoir. Cost of Old Hickory and Cordell Hull projects, including locks, is estimated as $136,973,900 (October 1981). Estimated cost of Celina Dam (1959) is $39,100,000. (See table 23-C at end of chapter for listing of principal features.) Under flood conditions as presently regulated, including effect of surcharge operation of Old Hickory project, extreme fluctuations of stage in this section of river vary from a range of 35 feet at Nashville (mile 191) to a maximum of 46 feet immediately below Old Hickory Dam (mile 216.2), and from an 8-foot variation in headwater at dam to 36 feet in vicinity of Carthage, Tenn., (mile 313.5); present head of navigation; with variations up to 35 feet at Celina, Tenn. (mile 380.8) and 29 feet in tailwater at Wolf Creek Dam (mile 460.9). Maximum fluctuations under ordinary conditions from power flows vary from about 7 feet at Nashville to 14 and 3 feet, respectively, in tailwater and headwater of Old Hickory Dam, and at other key points as follows: 13 feet at Carthage; 18 feet at Celina; and 19 feet at Wolf Creek Dam. Further details on project authorization for river sections below and above Nashville are shown on Table 23-B. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for 6- foot navigation project. Under modified project for 9-foot navigation and multiple-purpose development, recreation features of reservoir components are subject to certain conditions of non-Federal cost-sharing under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Terminal facilities. There are 49 terminals on the Cumberland River (1 municipally owned and open for public use; 5 government owned facilities and 43 privately owned facilities). A total of 28 terminals have railroad connections. Principal commodities handled are petroleum products, stone, sand, gravel, coal, coke, iron, steel, chemicals, grain, and miscellaneous. Nineteen terminals are set up to handle various types of commodities. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. For further information see page 695 of Annual Report for 1969. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Below Nashville: Recreation facilities pirovided at Cheatham project under (Code 711) cost $11,347, and Barkley (Code 713) cost $362. State of Kentucky contributed $17,603 to riprap shoreline at Barkley State Park. Above Nashville: Recreation facilities provided at pordell Hull and Old Hickory under (Code 711) cost $150,593, $1,952; respectively. Operation and Maintenance: Barkley, Cheatham, Cordell Hull, and Old Hickory locks and dams were operated as required. Operation and Maintenance improvements at Barkley included boundary line surveying and marking 23-2 NASHVILLE, TENN., DISTRICT property lines, unwatering and repairing lock gates, replacing 4-way control valves, and cultural resources reconnaissance survey. Work at Cheatham included replacing control valves, and completion of equipment storage building contract. Work at Cordell Hull included boundary line surveying and marking property lines. Work at Old Hickory included awarding a contract for boundary line surveying and marking property lines. Total net energy generated at Barkley Dam (495,890,620 kw-hr) was made available through Department of the Interior to the Tennessee Valley Authority, Southern Illinois power Cooperative, Big Rivers Rural Electric Cooperative Corporation, and Indiana Statewide Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc., Hoosier Energy Division. Total net energy generated at Cheatham Dam (125,136,800 kw-hr), Cordell Hull (239,773,155 kw-hr), and Old Hickory (298,853,850 kw-hr) was made available for distribution. Power revenues were $1,843,840; $924,190; $2,125,938, and $1,811,268 respectively. Activities under reservoir management program comprising malaria control, shoreline sanitation, land management and disposal, and maintenance of public-use facilities continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Below Nashville: Construction of Cheatham lock and dam was completed in November 1960. See page 1078 of 1962 Annual Report for chronology of construction. Acquisition for Barkley project includes 69,750.7 acres in fee 24,277.6 acres in easements and 2,926 acres under use permit with exception of permanent transfer of about 5,032 acres in fee (Land between the Lakes Project) and a use permit (flowage rights) over about 537 acres (Cumberland Steam Plant) from T.V.A., all land and land rights for the project have been procured. Project considered complete during FY 1974 and in full operation. Lock was opened to navigation on July 8, 1964. The four power units were placed in commercial operation January 21, February 4, March 7, and March 30, 1966. Total new work costs for this section to September 30, 1981 were $181,802,113 including $685,000 public works funds. Above Nashville: Old Hickory project provides a through channel for 9-foot navigation on the Cumberland above Nashville to vicinity of Carthage, Tenn., at river mile 313.5. Lock and dam 8, placed in an inoperative status November 30, 1951, was inundated with partial impoundment of Cordell Hull Reservoir. Full impoundment during FY 1973 extends the 9- foot waterway to Celina, river mile 380.8 Old Hickory project was completed for full beneficial use December 1957 with placement of last power unit in commercial operation. Further details are given on page 1080 of Annual Report for 1962. Construction of Cordell Hull project, started May 1963, was completed September 1980. Total lands acquired 27,176 acres (26,708 in fee and 468 acres in easements). Total new work costs for this section to September 30, 1981 were $135,735,723. Operation and maintenance of structures: Barkley, Cheatham, Cordell Hull, and Old Hickory locks were in operation at end of period; structures, channels, and appurtenances were maintained in serviceable condition. Total costs of existing project for entire stream were $418,762,374 of which $317,537,836 (including $685,000 from public works funds) were for new work and $101,224,538 for operation and maintenance. Surplus property valued at $237,019 has been transferred to project without reimbursement. Benefits attributable to reduction of flood flows by the Barkley project to date amount to $23,187,000. Power revenues received to date; Barkley, $29,107,004; Cheatham, $17,787,434; Cordell Hull, $15,754,755; and Old Hickory, $37,322,254. 2. TENNESSEE RIVER, TENN., ALA., AND KY. Location. Formed by junction of French Broad and Holston Rivers in eastern Tennessee, 4.4 miles above Gay Street Bridge at Knoxville, flows southwest into northern Alabama, thence in a generally westerly course across north Alabama, to northeast boundary of Mississippi, thence nearly due north across Tennessee and Kentucky, entering Ohio River at Paducah, 652.1 miles from junction of French Broad and Holston Rivers. (See Geological survey base map of Tennessee River Basin.) Previous projects. For details see pages 1902- 1906, Annual Report for 1915; pages 1190-1194, 1196-1216, and 1220-1222, Annual Report for 1929; and page 1216, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Originally provided for permanent improvement of river for a navigable depth of 9 feet at low water from mouth about 650 miles to Knoxville, Tenn. Only work performed by the Corps was construction of lock at General Joe Wheeler Dam and miscellaneous appurtenant improvements at a new work cost of $2,244,236. Tennessee Valley Authority program provided for obtaining authorized 9-foot project by construction of high dams and locks and utilization of certain locks and dams previously constructed under jurisdiction of the Corps. (See Table 23-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Subsequent construction by that agency 23-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 of Melton Hill Dam extends navigable channel of Tennessee River system up the Clinch River about 38 miles above damsite (mile 23.1) to vicinity of Clinton, Tenn. (See table 23-D on Tennessee River.) In accordance with general navigation laws placing control and supervision over navigable waters under direction of Secretary of the Army, Corps of Engineers operates and maintains all locks, and maintains navigation channels and safety harbors by performing all necessary maintenance dredging and snagging operations. For information concerning other functions of the Corps under division of responsibilities for Tennessee River since adoption of Tennessee Valley Authority Act of 1933, see page 1084 of Annual Report for 1962. Local cooperation. Authorization requires no local cooperation in construction of alternate system of low dams. It does, however, provide that if high dams are built before the United States builds projected locks and low dams which are to be replaced, the United States shall contribute to cost of substituted structures an amount equal to estimated cost of works of navigation for which substitution is made. Terminal facilities. There are 166 terminals on the Tennessee River (7 municipally owned, 27 government owned facilities and 132 privately owned facilities). A total of 79 terminals have railroad connections. Principal commodities handled are petroleum products, stone, sand, gravel, coal, coke, grain, chemicals, iron, steel, and miscellaneous. Seventy two terminals handle various types of commodities. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. A list of terminals is revised annually and can be obtained from Division Engineer, Ohio River Division, Corps of Engineers, Cincinnati, Ohio. For further information see page 698 of Annual Report for 1969. Operations and results during fiscal year. Channel work by government plant and hired labor consisted of dredging and snagging at various locations, and maintenance of mooring facilities and safety harbors. Cost of channel maintenance was $539,669. Operation and maintenance of structures: All locks were operated and lock appurtenances and standby plant maintained as required. Major maintenance work items were overhaul gate operating machinery at Kentucky Lock, overhaul gate and valve operating machinery at Guntersville Lock, and replace mooring cells at mile 274. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project is complete. Construction under the project was commenced January 1933 and completed September 1944. Additional work includes construction of Melton Hill project (mile 23.1 Clinch River) completed in FY 1963, added 61 miles of 9 foot channel to the Tennessee River system for a total of about 711 miles of nine foot navigation channel. Construction of additional and modified navigation features by TVA, completion and operation dates are shown on pages 698 and 699 of Annual Report for FY 1969. See table 23-E for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1981. 3. TENNESSEE-TOMBIGBEE WATERWAY, ALABAMA AND MISSISSIPPI Location. West Central Alabama and Northeastern Mississippi; in Marengo, Sumter, Greene and Pickens Counties, Alabama, and Noxubee, Lowndes, Clay, Monroe, Itawamba, Prentiss and Tishomingo Counties, Mississippi. Existing project. Provides for a waterway 232 miles in length, connecting the Tombigbee and Tennessee Rivers by way of the East Fork of Tombigbee River, Mackeys and Yellow Creeks, affording a channel not less than 9 feet deep and 280 feet in bottom width, with 10 locks each having clear chamber dimensions of 110x600 feet. Construction of the divide section, including Bay Springs lock and dam, is assigned to the Nashville District; whereas, the prosecution of work on the river and canal sections is under the jurisdiction of the Mobile District. Only activities of the Nashville District are reported hereon. Estimated Federal cost of new work under jurisdiction of the Nashville District is $732,000,000. Local cooperation. Authorization requires local interests to construct, maintain and operate all highway bridges, construct and maintain all highway relocations or alterations, make and maintain alterations as required to sewer, water supply and drainage facilities, assume cost of operation and maintenance of utility crossings, provide and maintain as required suitable and adequate river and canal terminals in accordance with plans approved by the Secretary of the Army and the Chief of Engineers. Operations and results during fiscal year. Engineering and design continued. Work continued on Bay Springs Lock, Dam, and Access Road contracts for DC/4/2A Plug, DC2, DC3A, and DC4B and 1; contracts were awarded for Clearing Area A and Clearing D at Bay Springs. Contract awarded and completed for Excavation Upstream of Highway 25 Bridge. 23-4 NASHVILLE, TENN., DISTRICT Condition at end of fiscal year. Total lands acquired 28,811 acres (28,602 in fee and 209 acres in easements). The project is 72 percent complete. 4. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS See table 23-F. 5. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Sec. 107, Public Law 86-645, as amended (preauthorization) . During the period $16,991 was expended for a study of New Johnsonville Port, Tenn. Alteration of Bridges 6. AUTHORIZED ALTERATION OF BRIDGES Work on Woodland Street bridge, under Truman-Hobbs Act, was initiated in 1965 and completed in 1966. Costs were $987,632. For details see page 922 of Annual Report for 1967. Flood Control 7. BIG SOUTH FORK NATIONAL RIVER AND RECREATION AREA, KENTUCKY AND TENNESSEE Location. The proposed project is located in Northeastern Tennessee and Southeastern Kentucky along the Big South Fork River and its tributaries in Pickett, Scott, Fentress, and Morgan Counties, Tennessee, and McCreary County, Kentucky. Existing project. A National Recreation Area will be established in accordance with the concept included in the interagency report prepared pursuant to section 208 of Flood Control Act of 1968. Total acreage is not to exceed 125,000 acres. The act specifically establishes the National Area for the purpose of preserving and interpreting the scenic, biological, archaeological and historical resources of the river gorge area and developing the natural recreational potential of the area. The area is divided into two categories, gorge and adjacent areas, with no construction permitted except limited clearing for establishment of day-use facilities, historical sites, primitive campgrounds and access roads. Lodges and other facilities will be provided in the adjacent areas. The project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1974 as amended by Water Resources Development Act of 1976. The present authorized cost (ceiling) for the project is $103,522,000. The National Park Service will operate and maintain the useable units of the area upon completion of land acquisition and construction of basic facilities by the Corps of Engineers. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Engineering and design continued. Several A-E contracts were awarded. Acquired 14,554 acres fee and 30.68 acres in easements. Contract awarded for Leatherwood Ford Road and Bridge. Condition at end of fiscal year. Acquisition has been completed on 59,501 acres fee and 56.74 acres easements. Master plan studies are complete. Federal environmental impact statement submitted to CEQ May 24, 1977. 8. MARTINS FORK LAKE, KY. Location. Dam planned at mile 15.6 on Martins Fork of Clover Fork, Cumberland River, about 10 miles southeast of city of Harlan, with reservoir extending about 6 miles upstream within Harlan County, southeastern Kentucky. Existing project. Multiple-purpose improvement combining flood control with water quality control and recreation development adopted by 1965 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 244, 89th Cong.), in general accordance with recommendations. Dam will be concrete type, about 504 feet long and rising 97 feet above streambed. Outlet works provide for release of water from reservoir at varying levels. Drainage area above damsite is 55.7 square miles. At full pool level, spillway crest at elevation 1341 above mean sea level, reservoir will cover 578 acres and contain 21,120 acre-feet of storage capacity. Provision is made for 17,450 acrefeet of reservoir capacity between elevations 1341 and 1300 for control of floods in winter and spring season, and 14,360 acre-feet (El. 1341-1310) during summer and fall, in conjunction with which storage of 3,090 acre-feet would be available on a seasonal basis to meet streamflow requirements for water quality control and fish life below the dam. A minimum permanent pool of 3,670 acre-feet, 274 acres in extent, will thus be provided during potential flood seasons; and during late spring and summer when flood storage can be reduced, the lake is to be operated generally at a higher level (El. 1310) to maintain a larger surface area of 340 acres for recreation and to provide the required seasonal storage for releases of water during critical low-flow periods. Project will prevent major portion of average annual 23-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 flood losses at Harlan and result in significant stage reductions with related benefits along rural reaches and at other urban areas downstream. Estimated cost of project, including $730,400 code 710 funds is $21,130,200 (October 1981). Local cooperation. Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965 applies in regard to non-Federal participation in recreation development, in addition to which local interests are to provide certain safeguards to ensure functioning of reservoir as intended. At this time, assurances have not been received for any non- Federal participation in the recreational development on this project as required under P.L. 89-72. Therefore, initially recreation will not be developed to the full potential and only minimum facilities will be provided. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Resource Managers Facilities contract completed. Deficiency judgment claim paid. Operation and maintenance: Dam was operated and structures and appurtenances operated as required. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is essentially complete. Total acquisition to date involves 1,764 acres fee and 327 acres easements. Two cemetery tracts remain unacquired. Completion of the project is scheduled in fiscal year 1982. 9. MIDDLESBORO, CUMBERLAND RIVER BASIN, KY. Location. At Middlesboro, Ky., on Yellow Creek, a tributary entering Cumberland River about 660 miles above its mouth. Existing project. A system of canals and levees around one side of town, arranged so as to divert most headwaters of Yellow Creek away from present channel through heart of city. Protection is thus afforded in large measure to life and property within business district and a large part of residential section. For project details, see page 1088 of Annual Report for 1962. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Work on levees, canals, and appurtenances was accomplished by hired labor. Condition at end of fiscal year. New work under existing project was completed in March 1945. Construction of canal and levee system, initiated in May 1938, was completed and improvement placed in operation in December 1939. Relocation work was completed in September 1940. Flood damages prevented to date amount to $19,175,000. 10. TUG AND LEVISA FORKS OF THE BIG SANDY RIVER AND CUMBERLAND RIVER, W. VA., VA., AND KY. Location. The proposed project is located in the State of West Virginia and the Commonwealths of Kentucky and Virginia. The Cumberland portion consists of the Upper Cumberland River Basin, above Cumberland Falls, Ky. The basin is approximately 100 miles in length, averaging 30 miles in width at the lower portion and 10 miles in width upstream at Harlan, Ky. The Big Sandy Basin is within the Huntington District and the Cumberland within the Nashville District. Existing project. Provides for flood control measures for communities in the Tug and Levisa Forks and Upper Cumberland River Basins. The Cumberland portion has been assigned to the Nashville District. Only activities of the Nashville District are reported hereon. Estimated Federal cost of new work under jurisdiction of the Nashville District is $81,000,000. The project was authorized by the Energy and Water Development Appropriation Act of 1981, Section 202 of PL 96-367. Local cooperation. Authorizing legislation requires that non-federal interests shall hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction works and maintain and operate all such works after their completion in accordance with regulations by the Secretary of the Army. Operations and results during fiscal year. Engineering and design initiated. Several A-E contracts were awarded. New construction of Highway U. S. 25 E was altered, at Corps expense, to accommodate the future tie-in of the flood control project at Barbourville, Ky. Submitted Draft Decision Document and draft Environmental Impact Statement for Pineville. Real estate proceeding with design memorandum. Condition at end of fiscal year. Planning for Pineville project on schedule. Negotiations with Kentucky Department of Transportation for the joint highway/floodwall project.are almost complete. July 1982 target date for a construction start-assuming no funding restrictions. 23-6 NASHVILLE, TENN., DISTRICT 11. OHIO RIVER BASIN (NASHVILLE DISTRICT) Location. A series of levees, floodwalls, channel improvements, and reservoirs in Ohio River Basin within Nashville District. Existing project. The general comprehensive plans approved for flood control and other purposes in Ohio River Basin is set forth in legislation listed in Table 23-B. Individual projects, local protection projects and lakes, considered in comprehensive plan within Nashville District are listed in Table 23-G. 12. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, and subsequent acts, requires local interests furnish assurances they will maintain and operate certain local protection projects after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by Secretary of the Army. District Engineers are responsible for administration of these regulations within their respective districts. Maintenance inspections were made during fiscal year of completed protective works in localities transferred to local interests for maintenance and operation. Local interests were advised, as necessary, of measures required to maintain projects in accordance with standards prescribed by regulations. Fiscal year cost was $15,023. Total cost to September 30, 1981 was $140,613. For project inspection data see table 23-H. 13. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See table 23-I. 14. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control and coastal emergencies (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation). Actual Federal costs for fiscal year were $114,347 for disaster preparedness. Emergency bank protection (Section 14, 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Congress). Fiscal year costs under Section 14 reports were $127,598 for Cumberland River, Clarksville, Tenn.; $20,456 for Clifton, Tenn., Tennessee River; $5,802 for Johnson Creek, Old Lock A Road Bridge, Tenn.; $6,377 for Louisville Point Park, Ft. Louden Lake, Tenn.; $73,975 for River Road, Cheatham County, Cumberland River, Tenn., and $10,310 contributed by Cheatham County, Tenn.; $4,988 for Rocky Point Park, Marshall County, Ky.; $10,337 for Soddy- Daisy, Tenn.; $7,500 for Valley River, Murphy, N. C.; and $9,734 for Wheeler Lake, Tennessee River, Decatur, Ala. Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, 1948 Flood Control Act, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization). Fiscal year costs were $4,684 for Clear Fork, Highcliff, Tenn.; and $57,281 for Whiteoak Creek, Sunbright, Tenn. 15. STREAMBANK EROSION CONTROL EVALUATION AND DEMONSTRATION ACT OF 1974 No funds were expended during fiscal year. Multiple-purpose Power Projects 16. CENTER HILL LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, TENN. Location. Dam is on Caney Fork River, 26.6 miles above its confluence with Cumberland River (mile 309.2) at Carthage, Tenn. It is in DeKalb County, Tenn., about 55 miles east of Nashville, and 14 miles southeast of Carthage, Tenn. Reservoir extends about 64 miles up main 'stream and about 10 miles up Falling Water River and lies within DeKalb, Putnam, White, and Warren Counties, Tenn. Existing project. A combination earth and concrete gravity-type dam, hydroelectric powerplant, and reservoir for primary purposes of flood control and power production, with a permanent pool for public use and conservation purposes. In addition to main dam structure, provision was made for a rolled-earth dike to close a saddle in reservoir rim near damsite. For further details, see page 1099 of 1962 Annual Report. Estimated cost of project including $9,478,800 code 710 funds is $53,950,200 (October 1981). Local cooperation. None required on completed project; future recreation development subject to certain conditions of non-Federal cost-sharing under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Recreation facilities provided under (Code 713) cost $2,229. Operation and maintenance: Dam was operated and structure and its appurtenances maintained as required. Operation of powerplant was continuous except for normal interruptions and necessary shutdowns for inspection and maintenance purposes. Total 23-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 net energy generated 122,531,000 kw-hr) was made available through Department of the Interior to Tennessee Valley Authority for distribution. Activities under reservoir management involved land management, public relations, and maintenance of public use facilities. Boundary line survey and marking contract was completed. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was completed for full beneficial use April 1951. For chronology of construction and major items of work performed, see page 1101 of Annual Report for 1962. Flood damage reductions to date amount to $62,533,000. Power revenues total $38,798,692. 17. DALE HOLLOW LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, TENN. AND KY. Location. Dam is on Obey River, 7.3 miles above its confluence with Cumberland River (mile 380.9) at Celina, Tenn. It is in Clay County, Tenn., and about 80 miles northeast of Nashville, Tenn., 28 miles north of Cookeville, Tenn., and 3 miles east of Celina, Tenn. Reservoir extends about 51 miles up main stream, 10 miles up East Fork, and 6 miles up West Fork of Obey River, and lies within Cumberland and Clinton Counties, Ky., and Clay, Pickett, Overton, and Fentress Counties, Tenn. Existing project. A concrete gravity-type dam, hydroelectric powerplant, and reservoir for primary purposes of flood control and power production with a permanent pool for public use and conservation purposes. See page 1096 of 1962 Annual Report for project details. Estimated cost of project including $13,791,900 code 710 funds and $150,000 non-Federal funds for recreation facilities under the completed projects program is $39,914,300 (October 1981). Local cooperation. None required on completed project; future recreation development subject to certain conditions of non-Federal cost-sharing under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: None. Operation and maintenance: Dam was operated and structures and appurtenances maintained as required. Operation of powerplant was continuous except for normal interruptions and necessary shutdowns for inspection and maintenance purposes. Total net energy generated (48,549,600 kw-hr) was made available through Department of the Interior to Tennessee Valley Authority for distribution. Activities under reservoir management program involved public relations, land management, and maintenance of public-use facilities. Contracts consist of replacing turbine plates; paving Lillydale recreation area; and paving Livingston, Holly Creek and Hendricks docks, and Willow Grove dock and recreation area. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was commenced in March 1942 and completed for flood control operation in October 1943. Powerplant (initial 2-unit development) was completed April 1949 and third unit installed and placed in operation December 1953. For further details and information on other major items of work, see page 1098 of Annual Report for 1962. Contracts have been awarded for paving at Lillydale recreation site, and for rehabilitation of turbine and generator modification. Flood damage reductions to date amount to $39,061,000. Power revenues total $29,466,734. 18. J. PERCY PRIEST DAM AND RESERVOIR, OHIO RIVER BASIN, TENN. Location. Damsite is on Stones River, 6.8 miles above its confluence with Cumberland River (mile 205.9); in Davidson County, Tenn.; and about 7 miles east of Nashville, Tenn. Reservoir extends southeasterly from dam about 32 miles along main stream, 10 miles up East Fork, 6.5 miles up West Fork, and for shorter distances up other tributaries of Stones River; and lies within Davidson, Rutherford, and Wilson Counties, Tenn. Existing project. A combination earth and concrete gravity-type dam, hydroelectric powerplant, and reservoir for primary purposes of flood control, power production and recreation. For further details see page 703 of 1969 Annual Report. Estimated cost of project including $4,224,000 under code 710 funds and $46,000 non-Federal funds for recreation facilities under the completed projects program is $57,- 877,700 (October 1981). Local cooperation. Recreation development subject to certain conditions of non-Federal cost-sharing under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Recreation facilities provided under (Code 711) cost $2,069; and (Code 713) cost $50,311. Metropolitan Nashville contributed $494 to Hamilton Creek recreation site. Operation and maintenance: Dam was operated and structures and appurtenances maintained as required. Total net energy generated (25,- 426,000 kw-hr) was made available through Department of the Interior to Tennessee Valley 23-8 NASHVILLE, TENN., DISTRICT Authority for distribution. Activities under reservoir management program involved public relations, fish and wildlife management, and maintenance of public-use facilities. Contracts consisted of boundary line surveying and marking, and repairing generator coils. Condition at end of fiscal year. Substructure, initiated in 1963, was completed in 1968. Closure of dam was completed in December 1967, with project effective for flood control. Completion of the powerplant was accomplished in February 1970. Initial recreation completed. Total reservoir lands acquired from private interests is 33,351.00 acres in fee and 589.00 acres in easement including flowage rights reserved over 229 acres in fee disposal of Sewart Air Force Base. With exception of recreation facilities under code 710 this project was considered complete June 30, 1976. Flood damage reductions to date amount to $39,812,000. Power revenues total $13,094,053. 19. LAUREL RIVER LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, KY. Location. Damsite is at mile 2.3 on Laurel River, a tributary of Cumberland River, in southcentral Kentucky. The two streams meet about 9 miles below Cumberland Falls, a prominent physiographic feature at head of Lake Cumberland which is formed by Wolf Creek Dam. Reservoir extends 19.2 miles upstream to site of Corbin, Ky. water-supply dam and lies within Laurel and Whitley Counties. Existing project. Project approved in general accordance with recommendations of House Document 413, 86th Congress, by 1960 Flood Control Act, as amended by Public Law 88-253, was designed for purposes of flood control, power, and recreation as an integral unit of a coordinated plan for development of water resources of Cumberland River Basin. With the view of a net gain in power potential on a system basis, the plan of improvement incorporated appropriate flood control storage in the proposed project and corresponding adjustment in operations of Wolf Creek Dam-Lake Cumberland for flood control and power, which in effect constituted a transfer of reservoir capacity without entailing a change in flood control benefits. Further detailed study giving full consideration to power capabilities and marketing arrangements indicated the advantage of maintaining present storage allocation at Wolf Creek and use of all available storage capacity of Laurel River Reservoir for power. As modified within discretionary authority of the Chief of Engineers, the project is under construction in primary interest of power production and recreation, at an estimated cost of $59,400,000 (October 1981). Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Holly Bay Recreation Area and Flatwoods Day Use Center 99 percent complete. Contracts were awarded for Grove Access Road and Recreation Area, and Right Abutment Drainage System. Forest Service continued work on recreation sites under agreement. Operations and maintenance: Dam was operated and structures and appurtenances maintained as required. Total net energy generated (34,882,000 kw-hr) was made available through Department of the Interior for distribution. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of right bank access road, initiated in December 1964, completed in August 1965. Contract for construction of diversion and power tunnels, started in April 1966, was completed in December 1967. Stage 1 Dam construction was initiated in April 1968 and completed in June 1969. Stage II Dam construction commenced in August 1969 and completed in September 1972. Lands acquired for project purposes total 8,542 acres fee and 65 acres easement. Transferred 6,337 acres fee to U. S. Forest Service and 1 acre easement to State of Kentucky. Project as a whole is about 83 percent complete. Powerhouse contract completed in December 1979. Power plant placed in commercial use in October 1977. Power revenues total $5,809,690. 20. WOLF CREEK DAM-LAKE CUMBERLAND, OHIO RIVER BASIN, KY. Location. Wolf Creek Dam is on Cumberland River at mile 460.9 (above mouth) in Russell County, Ky., about 10 miles southwest of Jamestown and 12 miles north of Albany, Ky. Lake Cumberland extends 101 miles up main stream, 48 miles up South Fork of Cumberland River, in Russell, Clinton, Wayne, Pulaski, Mc- Creary, Laurel, and Whitley Counties, Ky. Existing project. A combination earth and concrete gravity-type dam, hydroelectric powerplant, and reservoir for primary purposes of flood control and power production, with a permanent pool for public-use and conservation purposes. See page 1094 of 1962 Annual Report for project details. Estimated cost of project is $189,461,886 (October 1981). This estimate includes $4,054,600 code 710 funds, $880,000 non- Federal funds for recreation facilities under the completed program, and $104,920,386 for major rehabilitation. 23-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 Local cooperation. None. required on completed project; future recreation development subject to certain conditions of non-Federal cost-sharing under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Activity involving the integrity of the structure began in 1968 when a leak or seepage developed in the embankment. Contract for the concrete diaphragm wall, increments 2 and 4 and concrete diaphragm wall, increments 1 and 3 were completed. Recreation facilities provided under (Code 713) cost $136,070. State of Kentucky contributed $149,100 for Wright Hollow Boat launching ramp. Operation and maintenance: Dam was operated and structures and appurtenances maintained as required. Operation of powerplant was continuous except for normal interruptions and necessary shutdowns for inspection and maintenance purposes. Total net energy generated (490,262,000 kw-hr) was made available through Department of the Interior to Tennessee Valley Authority for distribution. Activities under reservoir management program involved land management activities, public relations, and maintenance of public-use facilities. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project commenced August 1941 and was completed for full beneficial use August 1952. For chronology of construction and major items of work performed see page 1095 of 1962 Annual Report. Project as a whole is about 99 percent complete. Flood damage reductions to date amount to $163,632,000. Power revenues total $89,271,693. 21. OTHER AUTHORIZED MULTIPLEPURPOSE POWER PROJECTS (See table 23-J.) General Investigations 22. SURVEYS Costs for this period were $585,476 for which $63,713 was for navigation, $470,267 for flood damage prevention studies and $51,496 for coordination studies with other agencies. 23. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Costs for this period were $51,656 for flood plain management programs, $45,920 for technical services to others, $5,348 for flood plain management services, totalling $102,924. 23-10 TABLE 23-A NASHVILLE, TENN., DISTRICT COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project 1. Cumberland River, Tenn. and Ky.1 2. Tennessee River, Tenn., Ala. and Ky.6 3. Tenn.-Tombigbee Waterway, Alabama & Mississippi 7. Big South Fork National River and Rec. Area Ky. and Tenn. 8. Martins Fork Lake, Ky. 9. Middlesboro, Cumberland River Basin, Ky. 10. Tug & Levisa Forks of the Big Sandy & Cumberland River, W. Va., Va., & Ky. 11. Cumberland, Ky. 16. Center Hill Lake, Ohio River Basin, Tenn. 17. Dale Hollow Lake, Ohio River Basin, Tenn. & Ky. 18. J. Percy Priest Dam and Reservoir OTio River Basin, Tenn. 19. Laurel River Lake, Ohio River Basin, Ky. Funding FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 Sept. 30, 1981 New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 466,302 1,269,985 8,258,739 8,794,136 3,919,000 3,970,633 70,000,000 69,667,735 1,600,000 1,084,166 506,000 750,582 8,823,997 9,346,673 4,263,000 4,197,111 117,579,000 123,161,567 19,200,000 19,043,168 41,000 130,000 26,488 123,929 - 2,500,000 - 1,408,093 88,805 142,642 2,235,000 2,116,901 -3,923 2,335,000 1,827,710 140,618 213,969 1,390,000 1,376,104 2,140,000 2,231,740 640,000 605,855 - 93,000 - 1,714 2,137,000 2,192,593 1,963,000 2,424,393 40,000 52,874 1,993,000 1,937,975 2,094,000 2,349,517 615,000 638,017 430,500 705,904 9,900,000 9,708,780 4,750,000 4,755,596 133,300,000 133,493,093 4,440,900 4,438,717 537,851 355,000 343,729 4,016 185,052 11,962,325 11,878,926 5,255,000 5,276,536 121,765,000 119,325,924 15,770,131 10,093,287 10,000 109,146 355,000 352,256 1,813,000 550,000 3,679,989 436,809 - 241,000 - 231,237 276,000 150,000 236,625 211,875 - 2,600 189,889 1,668,000 1,789,719 17,000 84,243 1,604,200 1,726,284 417,800 62,057 1,272,000 1,387,220 2,081,813 2,156,244 301,000 281,176 154,000 639,254 1,762,000 1,777,065 111,000 208,110 1,681,000 1,696,333 189,000 533,979 1,593,000 1,598,694 1,450,000 2,408,671 420,000 397,297 23-11 $318,390,797 318,364,090 8 119,371,773 118,502,899 16,251,428 16,251,428 70,604,451 70,428,300 8 400,000 400,000 510,094,050 506,460,032 * 42,421,031 35,856,615 '" 20,409,800 20,321,449 " 951,000 927,222 12 817,83018 817,830 3 1,514,844 1,492,779 14 2,500,000 1,408,093 66,642 66,642 53,241,875 ' 53,226,085 18 24,449,087 17 24,361,442 18 27,940,004 " 27,940,004 -" 24,772,927 21 24,677,954 22 56,852,947 23 56,834,249 " 14,177,206 25 14,051,796 2" 50,318,231 49,743,795 " 1,976,000 1,922,345 2" REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 23.A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 Sept. 30, 1981 20. Wolf Creek Dam and New Work Lake Cumberland, Approp. 221,300 990,000 1,170,000 86,110 83,007,508 29 Ohio River Basin, Ky. Cost 383,707 592,105 1,727,245 280,850 82,892,106 ' Maint. Approp. 1,945,000 2,135,000 2,103,000 2,225,000 35,782,561 ", Cost 2,375,703 2,079,743 2,145,076 2,232,648 35,716,938 32 Rehab. Approp. 29,666,000 18,700,000 3,834,000 920,000 105,124,237 Cost 29,323,130 19,158,515 3,344,381 612,001 104,000,508 83 1. Includes $9,707,354 for abandoned and/or replaced works under the old Cumberland River system. (Amount includes $826,253 for new work and $3,266,- 706 for maintenance pn previous projects.) 2. Includes $61,733 public works acceleration funds, and $102,966 contributed by the State of Kentucky. 3. Includes $61,733 public works acceleration funds, and $102,966 contributed by the State of Kentucky. In addition, surplus property valued at $133,550 transferred from project without reimbursement. 4. Includes $581,300 for special recreation use fees, and $859,303 for maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. 5. Includes $579,835 for special recreations use fees and $859,303 for maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. In addition surplus property valued at $100,479 transferred from project without reimbursement. 6. Includes $14,007,193 for new work and $4,005,- 175 for maintenance on previous projects. 7. Includes $310,319 for maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. 8. Includes $310,319 for maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. In addition, surplus property valued at $54,543, transferred from project without reimbursement. 9. Surplus property valued at $8,358 transferred to project without reimbursement. 10. Surplus property valued at $7,723 transferred to project without reimbursement. 11. Surplus property valued at $5,789 transferred to project without reimbursement. 12. Surplus property valued at $2,877 transferred to project without reimbursement. 13. Includes $38,876 Emergency Relief Funds. 14. In addition, surplus property valued at $4 transferred to project without reimbursement. 15. Includes $35,896 public works acceleration funds. 16. Includes $35,896 public works acceleration funds. In addition surplus property valued at $55,528 transferred to project without reimbursement. 17. Includes $178,400 funds for special recreation use fees. 18. Includes $178,400 funds for special recreation use fees. In addition, surplus property valued at $128,086 transferred from project without reimbursement. 19. Includes $51,789 public works acceleration funds, and $150,000 contributed by the State of Tennessee. 20. Includes $51,789 public works acceleration funds, and $150,000 contributed by the State of Tennessee. In addition, surplus property valued at $28,223 transferred to project without reimbursement. 21. Includes $196,600 funds for special recreation use fees. 22. Includes $196,556 funds for special recreation use fees. In addition, surplus property valued at $1,868 transferred to project without reimbursement. 23. Includes $46,000 contributed by the Metropolitan Government, Nashville, Tenn. 24. Includes $44,719 contributed by the Metropolitan Government, Nashville, Tenn. In addition, surplus property valued at $386,000 transferred to project without reimbursement. 25. Includes $145,800 for special recreation use fees. 26. Includes $145,439 for special recreation use fees. In addition, surplus property valued at $361,193 transferred to project without reimbursement. 27. Includes surplus property valued at $8,595 transferred to project without reimbursement. 28. Includes $28,483 transferred from project without reimbursement. 29. Includes $96,920 public works acceleration funds, and $880,000 contributed by the State of Kentucky. 30. Includes $96,920 public works acceleration funds, and $880,000 contributed by the State of Kentucky. In addition, surplus property valued at $46,488 transferred to project without reimbursement. 31. Includes $82,048 public works acceleration funds and $158,900 funds for special recreation use fees. 32. Includes $82,048 public works acceleration funds and $158,595 funds for special recreation use fees. In addition, surplus property valued at $85,417 transferred from project without reimbursement. 33. Includes surplus property valued at $6,525 transferred from the project without reimbursement. 23-12 TABLE 23-B NASHVILLE, TENN., DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents July 13, 1892 June 25, 1910 August 30. 1935 July 24, 1946 June 19, 1952 September 3, 1954 July 14, 1960 August 5, 1886 March 2, 1907 March 2,' 1919 June 5, 1920 July 3, 1930 June 26, 1934 July 24, 1946 July 3, 1930 May 18, 1933 October 1, 1980 CUMBERLAND RIVER BELOW NASHVILLE Provision made for lock A Provision made for locks B to F, and for dredging below lock F. Repairing dams A to F, inclusive, and surmounting same with movable crests. Provision of 9-foot channel by the construction of 3 moderate height dams below Nashville; via, Kuttawa (Eureka), Dover, and Cheatham. Provision for hydroelectric power production as a function of Cheatham Dam. Construction of Barkley (Lower Cumberland) dam and reservoir project for navigation, flood control, hydroelectric power, and related purposes in lieu of Kuttawa and Dover navigation-only structures. Authorized change in alignment of Illinois Central Railroad. CUMBERLAND RIVER ABOVE NASHVILLE Provision made for locks and dams; the Secretary of War to determine the final plan of improvement. Dimensions of the locks fixed in accordance with reports of Mar. 30, 1887, and Nov. 25, 1890. Adoption of the report of the Board of Engineers, dated Feb. 26, 1906, limiting the lock and dam construction to locks and dams 1 to 7, and 21. Provision made for locks and dams 8 to 17 Authorizes work to proceed in Tennessee without waiting for action of local interests in Kentucky. Raising dam 1, 3 feet Operation and care of locks and dams provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors. Construction of Old Hickory, Cordell Hull (Carthage), and Celina Dams above Nashville for navigation and the development of power resources. TENNESSEE RIVER Authorized navigable depth of 9 feet from mouth about 650 miles to Knoxville, Tennessee to be obtained by construction of low dams. Authorized TVA to construct such dams in the Tennessee River as will provide a 9 foot channel. Design and construct flood control measures for communities in the Upper Cumberland River basins. Annual Report, 1890, p. 2151 H. Does. 758, 60th Cong., 1st sess.; and 1481, 60th Cong., 2d sess.1 H. Doc. 38, 73d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc 761, 79th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 81, 83d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 56, 86th Cong., 2d sess. Annual Report 1884, p. 1663. Annual Report 1888, p. 1622, and Annual Report 1892, p. 1933. H. Doc. 699, 59th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 10, 63d Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 26, 70th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 761, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 328, 71st Cong., 2d. sess. Sec. 202, PL 96-367 23-13 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 23-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents August 28, 1937 June 28, 1938 August 18, 1941 December 22, 1944 July 24, 1946 May 17, 1950 December 30, 1963 June 18, 1965 August 13, 1968 June 19, 1970 March 7, 1974 March 7, 1974 July 24, 1946 OHIO RIVER BASIN, NASHVILLE DISTRICT Construct levees, floodwalls, and drainage structures for protection of cities and towns in Ohio River Basin. Project to be selected by Chief of Engineers with approval of Secretary of War at a cost not to exceed $24,877,000 for construction. Approved general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in Ohio River Basin as may be advisable at discretion of Secretary of War and Chief of Engineers, and for initiation and partial accomplishment of plan, authorized $75 million for reservoirs and $50,300, for local flood protection works. Additional $45 million for prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Additional $70 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Additional $125 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan. Additional $100 million for prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Additional $150 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in Ohio River Basin. Additional $89 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Additional $35 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Additional $69 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Authorized establishing Big South Fork National River and Recreation Area, Ky. and Tenn. Total area not to exceed 125,000 acres. Additional $120 million for further prosecution of Comprehensive Plan for Ohio River Basin. TENNESSEE-TOMBIGBEE RIVERS Construction of waterway to connect above rivers and provide a 9 foot channel and minimum bottom width of 170 feet in river and canal sections and 150 feet in the divide cut, with locks 110 by 600 feet clear inside dimensions. Subsequent studies determined most practical plan consists of channel with bottom width of 300 feet (280 feet in divide cut), fewer locks with higher lifts resulted in reducing number of lifts from 18 to 10 and reduced length from 260 to 253 miles. Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 762, 77th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 506, 78th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 6755, 89th Cong., 1st sess. S. 3710, 90th Cong., 2d sess. H. R. 15166 91st Cong., 2d sess. H.R. 10203 93rd Cong. Water Resources Develop. Act of 1974 Amended by P1 94-587, 94th Cong. H.R. 10203 93rd Cong. River Basin Monetary Authorization Act of 1974 H. Doc. 486, 79th Cong., 2d sess. Page 1343, Part I, FY 1968 House Hearings. 1. Contains latest published maps. Included in Public Works Administration program Sept. 6, 1933. 2. Permanent Appropriation Repeal Act. 23-14 NASHVILLE, TENN., DISTRICT TABLE 23-C CUMBERLAND RIVER, TENN. AND KY.: PRINCIPLE FEATURES (See Section 2 of Text) Dam and Reservoir Barkley Cheatham Old Hickory Cordell Hull Celina Nearest town Miles above mouth of river Lock dimensions (feet) 1 Lift at normal pool levels (feet) Depths on guardsills at minimum pool levels (feet) Character of foundation Dam: Type Height Length, exclusive of lock section (feet) Spillway: Gross length (feet) Net length opening (feet) Crest gates: Type Number Size (feet) Operating levels at dam (feet, mean sea level) : Maximum regulated Normal operation: Full pool Minimum pool Minimum pool in advance of floods Reservoir area (acres) Reservoir capacity (acre-feet) : Flood control Power drawdown Dead storage Total Canal: Length (miles) Bottom width (feet) Depth at minimum pool level (feet) Power development: Number of units Generator rating (kilowatts) Total installation (kilowatts) Kuttawa, Ky., 11 miles. 30.6 110 by 800 57 11, upper; 13, lower Rock Concrete gravity and earthfill 157 9,959 804 660 Tainter 12 55 by 50 375 359 354 346 93,430 1,213,000 'a. 259,000 610,000 2,082,000 Ashland City, Tenn., 9 miles. 148.7 110 by 800 26 14, upper; 17, lower Rock Concrete gravity 75 800 480 420 Tainter 7 60 by 27 Old Hickory, Tenn., 3 miles. 216.2 84 by 400 60 14, upper; 13, lower Rock Concrete gravity and earthfill 98 3,605 2 325 270 Tainter 6 45 by 41 450 s 385 382 7,450 19,800 ' 84,200 104,000 442 27,450 125,000 s 63,000 357,000 545,000 Carthage, Tenn., 5 miles. 313.5 84 by 400 59 14, upper; 13, lower Rock Concrete gravity and earthfill 93 1,138 2 291 225 Tainter 5 45 by 41 508 8 508 501 499 13,920 85,600 5,6 20,500 204,800 310,900 Celina, Tenn., 5 miles. 385.4 Rock Concrete gravity and earthfill 86 2,298 290 250 Tainter 5 50 by 37 555 3 550 549 13,150 59,000 s 10,000 179,000 248,000 1.75 400 11 32,500 130,000 12,000 36,000 25,000 100,000 33,333 100,000 3 23,000 69,000 23-15 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 23-C (Continued) CUMBERLAND RIVER, TENN. AND KY.: PRINCIPLE FEATURES (See Section 2 of Text) Dam and Reservoir Barkley Celina Cheatham Cordell Hull Old Hickory Percent of project completion 8 - 8 88 Year opened to navigation 1964 - 1952 1973 1954 Estimated cost $146,903,900 $39,100,000 $31,611,800 $84,363,600 $52,610,300 1. Clear width and length available for full width. 2. Exclusive of lock section. 3. Surcharge. 4. Normal operation (elev. 375-359) during nonflood season; flood control allowance to be increased to 1,472,000 acre-feet (elev. 375-354) during season of major floodflows. 5. Surcharge storage. 6. During flood season (elev. 508-501); minimum 51,800 acre-feet (elev. 508-504) with normal operation during nonflood season. 7. Daily pondage allowance; run-of-river project. 8. Completed for full beneficial use. 9. Includes recreation facility costs. 23-16 TABLE 23-D TENNESSEE RIVER (See Section 3 of Text) Lock Dimensions Length Minimum Depth Width Avail- Lift on Guard Sills of able for Year Miles Cham- Full Nor- Maxi- Opened Cost of Above Miles from her Width mal mum Lower Upper Character Navi- Kind Type of Each Lock Project 1 Mouth Nearest Town (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) of Foundation gation of Dam Construction and Dam Kentucky 22.4 0.5 above Gilbertsville, 110 600 56 73.3 12.7 11.0 Limestone 1942 Fixed Concrete and Ky. earthfill Pickwick Landing 206.7 4.4 above Hamburg, 110 600 55 63.0 12.8 10.0 Limestone 1937 Fixed Concrete and Tenn. earthfill Wilson Auxiliary lock 259.4 2.9 above Florence, 60 292 94 100.0 11.0' 11.2 Limestone 1927 Fixed Concrete and $46,973,540 ' Ala. 300 earthfill Main lock 259.4 2.9 above Florence, 110 600 94 100.0 13.0 13.0 Limestone 1959 - Ala. General Joe Wheeler: Auxiliary lock 274.9 18.4 above Florence, 60 400 48 51.5 13.2 14.7 Limestone 1934 Fixed Concrete and 1,796,295 * Ala. earthfill Main lock 274.9 18.4 above Florence, 110 600 48 51.5 13.0 13.0 Limestone 1963 Fixed Concrete and Ala. earthfill Guntersville : Auxiliary lock 349.0 9.1 below Guntersville, 60 360 39 45.0 11.8 13.0 Limestone 1937 Fixed - Ala. Main lock 349.0 9.1 below Guntersville, 110 600 39 45.0 12.7 13.0 Limestone 1965 Fixed Concrete and Ala. earthfill Nickajack: Auxiliary lock 424.7 39.4 below Chatta- 110 600 39 41.0 13.0 13.0 Limestone 1967 Fixed Concrete nooga, Tenn. Main lock 424.7 39.4 below Chatta- 110 800 39 41.0 13.0 13.0 Limestone Fixed Concrete nooga, Tenn. Chickamauga 471.0 6.9 above Chatta- 60 360 49 53.0 13.0 10.0 Limestone 1939 Fixed - ' nooga, Tenn. Watts Bar 529.9 6.8 above Breedenton, 60 360 58 70.0 11.8 12.0 Shale 1941 Fixed Concrete and Tenn. earthfill Fort Loudon 602.3 1.3 above Lenoir City, 60 360 72 80.0 11.8 12.0 Limestone 1943 Fixed Concrete and Tenn. earthfill Melton Hill 23.1 22.1 above Kingston, 75 400 54 60.0 13.0 13.0 Limestone 1963 Fixed Concrete (Clinch R.) Tenn. 1. H. Doc. 328, 71st Cong., 2d sess., contains table, pp. 98 and 99, giving pertinent information concerning low dams contemplated under 1930 project. Annual Report for 1938, pp. 1218 and 1219, contains similar information pertaining to low dams in addition to existing locks and dams, including those constructed or under construction by Tennessee Valley Authority. 2. Lock and dam constructed by Tennessee Valley Authority. 3. Lock and dam constructed by Tennessee Valley Authority. I)esign for lock prepared with Corps forces and funds. 4. Tailwater in canal; flight of 2 locks. 5. Constructed by the Corps under authority of sec. 124. National Defense Act of June 3, 1916 (H. Doc. 1262. 64th Cong.. 1st wss.). Actual cost of lock and dam. 6. Actual cost of lock only as constructed by the Corps; dams <(,nstructed by Tennessee Valley Authority. 7. Constructed by Tennessee Valley Authority. r JJ y tO -4~ REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TENNESSEE RIVER, TENN., ALA., AND KY. TOTAL COST OF EXISTING PROJECTS TO (See Section 3 of Text) SEPT. 30, 1981 Channel Operation & Funds New Work Maintenance Maintenance Total Regular $2,244,236 $5,942,397 $62,229,997 $70,416,630 1 Maintenance - - 11,665 11,665 Increase of compensation, - 5 - 5 rivers and harbors, 1919 (certified claims) Total $2,244,236 $5,942,402 $62,241,662 $70,428,300 1 1. In addition, surplus property value at $54,543 June 30, 1935, on operation and care of works of imwas transferred from the project without reimburse- provement under provisions of appropriation for such ment. Excludes $2,889,149 expended between 1890 and purposes. TABLE 23-F OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sept. 30, 1981 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Caney Fork River, Tenn.' 1895 27,828 - Clinch River, Tenn., and Va.2'" 1923 53,949 7,873 Duck River, Tenn.'. 1887 13,000 Elk River, Ala. and Tenn.'' 1904 4,000 - French Broad and Little Pigeon Rivers, Tenn.'26 1931 249,605 33,554 Hiwassee River, Tenn.'' 1923 113,311 9,754 Holston River, Tenn.'' 1911 5,714 - Little Tennessee River, Tenn.' 1888 5,510 Obey River, Tenn.' 1887 11,500 Red River, Tenn.' 1884 5,000 South Fork of Cumberland River, Ky.' 1892 11,967 1. Completed. 4. Recommended for abandonment in H. Doc. 467, 2. Inactive. 69th Cong., 1st Sess. 3. Recommended for abandonment in H. Doc. 532, 5. Recommended for abandonment in H. Doc. 428 64th Cong., 1st Sess. and 489, 64th Cong., 1st Sess. TABLE 23-G OHIO RIVER BASIN (NASHVILLE DISTRICT) LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS (See Section 11 of Text) Estimated Cost Type of Location Federal Non-Federal Total Protection Middlesboro Levees $581,000 $161,000 $742,000 (Yellow Creek, Ky.) 1,. Cumberland, Ky.s Channel 520,000 240,000 760,000 Improvement 23-18 TABLE 23-E NASHVILLE, TENN., DISTRICT RESERVOIRS Total Estimated Tributary Basin and Reservoir Stream Cost Center Hill Lake, Tenn." Caney Fork River $53,950,200 Dale Hollow Lake, Tenn. and Ky.3 Obey River 39,764,300 J. Percy Priest Dam & Reservoir, Tenn.3,' Stones River 57,831,700 Laurel River Lake, Ky." Laurel River 59,400,000 Martins Fork Lake, Ky. Martins Fork 21,130,200 Rossview, Tenn. and Ky.' 2 Red River 12,590,000 Three Islands, Tenn. 7 Harpeth River 19,900,000 1. See "Other authorized flood control projects." 5. Last revised in 1958. 2. Deferred. 6. See "Other authorized multiple-purpose pro- 3. Details of this project are in individual report. jects." 4. Formerly Stewarts Ferry Reservoir. 7. Deauthorized in 1977. TABLE 23-H INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 12 of Text) Project Date of Inspection Barbourville, Ky. Oct. 1980 and Apr. 1981 Corbin, Ky. Oct. 1980 and Apr. 1981 Lake City, Tenn. Oct. 1980 and May 1981 Middlesboro, Ky. (Yellow Creek) Oct. 1980 and Apr. 1981 Middlesboro, Ky. (Diversion Canal) Oct. 1980 and Apr. 1981 Paint Rock River, Ala. Sep. 1980 and Apr. 1981 Pineville, Ky. Oct. 1980 and Apr. 1981 Spring City, Tenn. Oct. 1980 and May 1981 TABLE 23-I OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sept. 30, 1981 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Barbourville, Ky." 1963 2,088,147 - Chattanooga, Tenn. and Rossville, Ga.1 1949 180,997 - Coal Creek and tributaries (Lake City), Tenn. 1962 460,134 - Corbin (Lynn Camp Creek), Ky. 1969 567,703 - Middlesboro (Yellow Creek), Ky." 1949 26,309 - Paint Rock River, Ala." 1967 544,173 - Pineville, Ky." 1963 1,669,176' - Rossview Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, Tenn. and Ky.2 - 6,779 - 1. Authorization expired Dec. 31, 1953 (Public Law 314, 82d Cong.) 2. Deferred. 3. Completed. 4. Exclusion of $9,950 contributed funds. 23-19 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 23-J OTHER AUTHORIZED MULTIPLE PURPOSE PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sept. 30, 1981 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Barkley Dam and Lake Barkley, Ky. and Tenn. ' 3 - $145,970,244 $33,550,081 Celina Dam, Ky.' '4 - 222,575 2 Cheatham lock and dam, Tenn.' 8 - 30,711,369 24,317,013 Cordell Hull lock and dam, Tenn.' - 79,824,492 13,505,691 Laurel River Lake, Ky. - 49,743,795 1,922,345 Old Hickory lock and dam, Tenn.'" - 51,928,056 29,851,753 Three Islands Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, Tenn.' - 111,855 2 1. Details given under "Cumberland River, Tenn. 3. Completed for beneficial use. and Ky." 4. Deauthorized in 1977. 2. Engineering and design. TABLE 23-K FLOOD PLAIN STUDIES COMPLETED DURING FISCAL YEAR (See Section 22 of Text) Location Requesting Agency Date Complete Federal Cost Dickson, Tenn. Federal Emergency Management, Atlanta, Ga. Apr. 1981 $12,800 Murfreesboro, Tenn. Federal Emergency Management, Atlanta, Ga. Apr. 1981 16,000 Smyrna, Tenn. Federal Emergency Management, Atlanta, Ga. Apr. 1981 26,900 Springfield, Tenn. Federal Emergency Management, Atlanta, Ga. May 1981 13,600 Trousdale County, Tenn. Federal Emergency Management, Atlanta, Ga. Jan. 1981 77,900 23-20 LOUISVILLE, KY, DISTRICT* This district comprises a portion of southwestern Ohio, west central Kentucky, a small portion of north central Tennessee, Indiana except northern part, and southeastern Illinois except Cairo-Mounds-Mound City area, all included in drainage basin of Ohio River and its tributaries (exclusive of Tennessee and Cumberland Rivers) from mile 438 (below Pittsburgh) immediately upstream from Foster, KY, to mouth. All cost and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation - Locks and Dams Page 1. Construction of Locks and Dams, Ohio River ........................ 24-2 2. Green and Barren Rivers, KY ....... 24-2 3: Kentucky River, KY ................ 24-2 4. Open-channel work, Ohio River ..... 24-3 5. Other authorized navigation projects ................. ............ 24-3 6. Navigation work under special authorization ........................ 24-3 Flood Control- Local Protection 7. Dayton, KY ......................... 24-3 8. Evansville, IN ...................... 24-3 9. Levee Unit No. 5, Wabash River, IN .................... 24-4 10. Mason J. Niblack Levee, Wabash River, IN .................... 24-4 11. Mill Creek, OH ..................... 24-5 12. Saline River and Tributaries, IL ....................... 24-5 13. Southwestern Jefferson County, KY ......................... 24-5 Flood Control- Reservoirs 14. Barren River Lake, KY............... 24-6 15. Brookville Lake, IN ................ 24-7 16. Buckhorn Lake, KY ................ 24-7 17. Caesar Creek Lake, OH ............ 24-7 18. Cagles Mill Lake, IN ............... 24-8 19. Camp Ground Lake, KY ............. 24-8 20. Carr Fork Lake, KY ................ 24-9 21. Cave Run Lake, KY ................ 24-9 22. Cecil M. Harden Lake, IN ........... 24-10 23. Clarence J. Brown Dam & Reservoir, OH ..................... 24-10 Flood Control- Reservoirs (Continued) Page 24. Falmouth Lake, KY ........... . 24-10 25. Green River Lake, KY ............. 24-11 26. Huntington Lake, IN ............... 24-11 27. Louisville Lake, IL .................. 24-12 28. Mississinewa Lake, IN .............. 24-12 29. Monroe Lake, IN .................. 24-13 30. Nolin Lake, KY ................. 24-13 31. Ohio River Basin (Louisville Dist.) ................... 24-13 32. Patoka Lake, IN ................... 24-14 33. Rough River Lake and Channel Improvements, KY ........ 24-15 34. Salamonie Lake, IN ........ .... 24-15 35. Taylorsville Lake, KY.............. 24-16 36. Wabash River Basin .............. 24-16 37. West Fork of Mill Creek Lake, OH ........................ 24-16 38. William H. Harsha Lake, OH ....... 24-17 39. Inspection of completed flood control projects ................. 24-18 40. Other authorized flood control projects .............................. 24-18 41. Flood control work under special authorization ............ 24-18 42. Streambank Erosion Control Evaluation and Demonstration Act of 1974 ......................... 24-18 General Investigations 43. Surveys ........................... 24-18 44. Collection and study of basic data ......................... 24-18 45. Research and development ......... 24-18 24-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 Navigation - Locks and Dams 1. CONSTRUCTION OF LOCKS AND DAMS, OHIO RIVER For report on this improvement, see this heading under Ohio River. 2. GREEN AND BARREN RIVERS, KY Location. Green River rises in Casey County, KY, flows northwesterly 370 miles, and empties into Ohio River about 8 miles above Evansville, IN. Barren River rises in Monroe County, KY, flows northwesterly 130 miles, and empties into Green River 1/2 mile above Lock 4 and 149.5 miles above mouth of Green River. Existing project. Six locks and dams on Green River and one on Barren River to give, with channel work in pools of dams, a navigable depth of 9 feet and width of 200 feet from Ohio River to mile 103 Green River, 3.2 miles upstream from Paradise, KY; a navigable depth of 5.5 feet from mile 103 Green River to Mammoth Cave, KY, mile 197.8 Green River, and from mouth of Barren River Mile 149.5 Green River, to Bowling Green, KY, mile 30.1 Barren River. Fluctuations in stage vary considerably at different locks. At Lock 3, Green River, ordinary high stages are from 12 to 15 feet above pool level, and at Lock 1, Barren River, from 7 to 10 feet above pool. Maximum stages of record are 34 feet above normal pool stage at Lock 3, Green River, and 29 feet at Lock 1, Barren River, obtained during floods of 1937 and 1913, respectively. (See Table 24-B for authorizing legislation and Table 24-C for principal data concerning locks and dams.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilites. Considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Table 24-D on terminal facilities.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Consisted of operation and maintenance of Locks and Dams, 1 to 3, Green River, and removal of shoals, snags, and slides as required to maintain adequate channel for existing traffic between mouth of Green River and Dam 4 at Mile 108.5 Green River. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Condition at end of fiscal year. Locks and Dams 1 and 2, Green River, and Lock and Dam 1, Barren River, are in good condition. Lock and Dam 3, Green River, is in fair condition and Lock 4, Green River is in poor condition. Dam 4, Green River, failed May 24, 1965, when 120 feet washed out. Breach later widened, and repairs are deferred pending completion of survey report for navigation on Green River. Pool of Dam 1, Barren River, is maintained for local small boat use, but navigation through lock is suspended because of loss of lower pool. Operation activity was discontinued at Lock 4 Green River and Lock and Dam 1 Barren River in January 1974. The residences and associated buildings and certain real estate at both locations were disposed of in January 1975. Operation of Locks 5 and 6, Green River, was discontinued August 1951, as they were no longer used by river traffic. Controlling project depth in lower 103 miles of Green River is 9 feet; controlling depth from mile 103 to Bowling Green, KY, is 5.5 feet. Under permit issued by District Engineer on August 20, 1963, private interests dredged channel of Green River to extend 9-foot depth to coal loading terminal at mile 105.7. Channel of Green River from mouth of Barren River at mile 149.5 to Mammoth Cave, KY, at mile 197.8, is no longer maintained and is blocked by deactivated Locks and Dams 5 and 6. 3. KENTUCKY RIVER, KY Location. Formed by confluence of its North and Middle Forks about 4 miles east of Beattyville in east central Kentucky, (South Fork joins the main stream at that location), flows northwesterly and enhpties into Ohio River at Carrollton, KY, mile 545.8 below Pittsburgh, PA. Existing project. Provides for 14 locks and fixed dams to give, in connection with improvement of Ohio River, slack water navigation of 6 feet minimum depth from Ohio River to places on the three forks that are short distances above Beattyville, KY. Length of 6-foot-depth project on main stem of Kentucky River is 258.6 miles to confluence of Middle and North Forks. Cost of completed new work is $4,176,749. River frequently rises to 35 feet or higher. Eixtreme height at Lock 1 due to flood backwater from Ohio River is 60.3 feet, while extreme floods reach height of 47.6 feet at Lock 4, and 35. 5 feet at Lock 14. At some intermediate locks extreme height of floods exceeds 40 feet. All flood heights refer to upper pool gages. Existing project was adopted by 1879 River and Harbor Act (H. Ex. Doc. 47, 45th Cong., 3d Sess., and Annual Report, 1879, p. 1398). Operation and care of locks and dams were included in project July 1, 1935, under provision of Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act of June 26, 1934. On December 19, 1976 the lock operation schedules for commercial traffic and recreational craft on the Kentucky River system were reduced from continuous 24-hour year-round operation to two shift year-round operation of Locks 1 through 4, intermittent daily operation 24-2 LOUISVILLE, KY, DISTRICT of Locks 5 through 10 and intermittent operation five days weekly of Locks 11 through 14. On April 9, 1980 the schedules for Locks 5 through 14 were further reduced for commercial traffic and recreational craft to provide for operation of Locks 5 through 10 on Monday through Thursday between noon and 8 p.m. and on Friday, Saturday and Sunday between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. and operations of locks 11 through 14 on the same days between noon and 8 p.m., local times, during the period May through October. Operation of Locks 5 through 14 for commercial traffic at other than the previously noted time is by appointment only, with 48-hour advance notice. Licenses. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission License No. 539, to Kentucky Utilities Co., at Dam 7, Kentucky River, Annual charge, $4,708; total collections through September 30, 1980, $239,481. (Collection amount for fiscal year 1981 not available from Department of Energy.) Terminal facilities. Facilities for bulk commodities and gasoline are at various points and considered adequate for existing traffic. List appears on page 1110, Annual Report for 1962. (See Table 24-E on locks and dams, Kentucky River, KY.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Consisted of operation and maintenance of the 14 locks and dams, and removal of shoals, snags, and slides as required to maintain an adequate channel for existing traffic between mouth of river and Beattyville, KY, in pool of Dam No. 14. Maintenance items completed were repairs to dam and construction of upper guide wall exterior at Lock and Dam 2 and construction of new shop and office building at Lock and Dam 4. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was completed in 1917. Work accomplished was rehabilitation of the five old State locks and dams and construction of new Locks and Dams 6 to 14 inclusive. Canalization system of Kentucky River is in poor condition. Repairs were made to deteriorated locks and dams as required to keep locks in operation and maintain pool levels above dams except in extreme dry weather, when some pools fall below normal levels, details in Annual Reports for 1963, 1964 and 1965. Channel work was performed as required to relieve critical hardship conditions for existing river traffic. Controlling navigable depth in length of river covered by existing project was 6 feet at end of fiscal year. 4. OPEN-CHANNEL WORK, OHIO RIVER For report on this improvement, see this heading under Ohio River. 5. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS See Table 24-F. 6. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION None. Flood Control - Local Protection 7. DAYTON, KY Location. In Campbell County, Kentucky on left bank of Ohio River from mile 467.0 to mile 469.2 and across the river from Cincinnati, Ohio. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Newport, KY.) Existing project. Provides for construction of 8,170 feet of levee, two pumping stations with gravity drainage structures and major relocations of storm and sanitary sewers serving the community. Estimated cost of new work (1981) is $12,820,000 Federal and $2,043,000 non- Federal. Local cooperation. Section 3 Gf the Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936 applies. Preliminary assurances of cooperation were received from City of Dayton, Kentucky on May 3, 1966. City has acquired all rights-of-way for the project. Operations and results during fiscal year. Engineering and design studies continued. Contract for sewer relocations was completed. Contracts for construction of access roads and levees and floodwall, purchase of pumps and motors and pumping plant structures at Main and McKinney Streets advanced to 81 percent, 71 percent and 84 percent completion, respectively. Condition of end of fiscal year. Contracts for demolition of existing buildings and structures in the levee area, and sewer relocations are complete. Project is about 84 percent complete overall. 8. EVANSVILLE, IN Location. In Vanderburgh County, IN, on right bank of Ohio River, 792.2 miles below Pittsburgh, PA. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Evansville-South, IN.) Existing project. Construction of a system of levees and concrete floodwalls, together with pumping plants for disposal of interior drainage, at Evansville. For further details, see Annual Report for 1962, page 1127. Project will provide protection for City of Evansville, IN, against Ohio River floods equal to 1937 flood 24-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 (maximum of record), with 3-foot freeboard. Estimated total cost of new work (1981) is $56,000,000 Federal, including $7,900,000 (Oct 1977) for Howell Section, Unit 2 that is in "inactive" category, and $7,982,000 non-Federal, including $352,000 (Oct 1977) for the said Howell Section, Unit 2. Existing project selected for construction under general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1937 Flood Control Act. Howell Section, Unit 2 was reclassified from the "active" to the "inactive" category July 7, 1977 based on current studies that indicated this part of the project is not economically justified. Local cooperation. Section 3 of Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, as amended, applies. Fully complied with for Howell Unit 1 and Knight Township sections. Assurances for Pigeon Creek Section, Unit 1 were executed February 11, 1963. Authorization-of-entry for Pigeon Creek Section, Unit 2, Parts 1 and 2 have been furnished. Operations and results during fiscal year. Engineering and design studies continued. Plans and specifications for levee and floodwall, Cedar Street to Stringtown Road, were completed. Design Memorandum for North 1st Avenue, Diamond Avenue, and Stringtown Road pumping plants remained at about 30 percent completion. Construction contract for Delaware Street pumping plant advanced to about 96 percent completion. Condition at end of fiscal year. Knight Township, Howell, Unit 1, and Pigeon Creek, Unit 1 Sections are complete. Howell Section, Unit 2, is in the "inactive" category. Construction of Pigeon Creek Section, Unit 2 was started in April 1974 and is about 22 percent complete. General Design Memorandum and Supplement on Pigeon Creek Unit 2, and Design Memorandum and plans and specifications for Delaware, Dresden and North 6th Avenue pumping plants are approved. Project is about 37 percent complete overall. 9. LEVEE UNIT NO. 5, WABASH RIVER IN Location. In Gibson and Posey Counties, IN, on left bank of Wabash River, from 58 to 94.5 miles above mouth. Existing project. Provides for construction of 41.9 miles of earth levee, drainage structures, pumping plants, together with alterations to three railroad bridges crossing Wabash River. Project provides protection for 44,000 acres of farm land and towns of Lyle, Skelton, and Griffin, IN, against a flood equal to that expected on an average of 7 times in each 100-year period. Estimated total cost of new work (1981) is $9,220,500, of which $905,500 is non-Federal cost for lands and damages and road and utility relocations. Project was authorized by Flood Control Acts of 1936 and 1946. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies. Assurances were executed by Superintendent of Levee District on January 8, 1962. Completed portions of project (levees) were transferred to the Levee District for operation and maintenance October 15, 1969. Emerson Ditch pumping plant was transferred to the Levee District for operation and maintenance November 24,1975. Operations and results during fiscal year. Engineering and design studies continued. Flood damages estimated at $3,608,000 were prevented during the 1981 flood season. Condition at end of fiscal year. All sections of levee, Emerson Ditch pumping plant, and required alterations of the Penn Central Railroad, Southern Railroad, and Illinois Central Railroad are complete. Design Memorandum Pumping Plant, Coffee Bayou, is complete. 10. MASON J. NIBLACK LEVEE, WABASH RIVER, IN Location. In Knox and Sullivan Counties, IN, on left bank of Wabash River, between miles 134.8 and 151.8 above mouth. Existing project. Construction of two sections of earth levee totaling 18 miles in length, three pumping plants for disposal of interior drainage, and other necessary appurtenances. Length of protection, including high ground between the two levee sections, is 18.9 miles long. Project protects 15,900 acres of agricultural land against a flood equal to that expected to occur 7 times in a 100-year period. Estimated cost of new work (1980) is $2,770,000. Cost of the completed levee was $1,663,200, of which $109,200 was non- Federal cost and $1,554,000 was Federal cost. The levee project was authorized by the 1946 Flood Control Act; pumping facilities were authorized by the 1968 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. Section 3 of the Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, as amended, applies. Fully complied with for levees and pumping plants. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation by local interests for flood control prevented damages estimated at $2,435,000 during 1981 flood season. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of levees complete and transferredto Mason J. Niblack Levee District in January 1965 for operation and maintenance. Construction of the pumping facilities and channel improvements complete and transferred to the local sponsor in May 1980. 24-4 LOUISVILLE, KY, DISTRICT 11. MILL CREEK, OH Location. Proposed project is located along the 18-mile length of Mill Creek and three-fourths mile length of East Fork in Hamilton County, Ohio. Lower Mill Creek is in the commercial and industrial heart of the Cincinnati metropolitan area in the southwestern portion of the State. Existing project. Eighteen miles of channel improvement, 2 miles of levees, two pumping plants, modification of 29 bridges, and the addition of two pumping units at the present Mill Creek Barrier Dam, located near the Ohio River, are included in the project. Acquisition and development with appropriate landscaping of 620 acres along the creek will be provided for high-density urban oriented recreational use. Estimated cost of new work (1981) is $189,297,000, of which $34,364,000 is non-Federal. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of 1936 as amended, applies. In addition, local interests must provide without cost to the United States all modifications and relocations of buildings, utilities, street and foot bridges, sewers, and related and special facilities as necessary for construction of project; prevent encroachment on improved channels and on ponding areas which would impair capacities; at least annually inform interests affected as to degree of protection afforded by project, and provide guidance and leadership in preventing unwise and uneconomical development of flood plain areas by encouraging prudent use of floodproofing, land regulation planning, or other flood plain management techniques to reduce flood losses. Further, with respect to the recreational aspects of the project, local interests are required to furnish assurances that they will, if necessary , pay or contribute in kind, a portion of the cost of recreational facilities which, when added to the cost of recreation land, would amount to at least 50 percent of the total first cost of the recreation land and recreational facilities, and assure access to the recreation facilities to all on equal terms. An assurance agreement covering local cooperation requirements for the project consistent with Section 221 of the 1970 Flood Control Act and the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 was executed by the Millcreek Valley Conservancy District February 6, 1975 and for the Secretary of the Army March 28, 1975. A recreation cost sharing contract was executed by the Conservancy District February 25, 1975 and approved by the Secretary of the Army May 28, 1975. Operations and results during fiscal year. Engineering studies continued. Initial contract for construction of channel and levee Section 7A, Phase I, awarded January 1981 and advanced to 86 percent completion. Condition at end of fiscal year. Design Memoranda, Hydrology & Hydraulics, Concrete Aggregate and Stone Protection Sources, and Railroad Relocations General Design Memoranda, Phase I and Phase II, Design of Channel - Section 5 are complete. Project is about 2 percent complete overall. 12. SALINE RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, IL Location. Saline River, which flows into the Ohio River at mile 867.4 below Pittsburgh, PA, and 10 miles below Shawneetown, IL, is formed by confluence of its south and Middleforks 27 miles above its mouth. North Fork joins main stream at stream mile 17.2. Project area is in Gallatin, Hamilton, and Saline counties in southeastern Illinois. Existing project. Provides for 9.9 miles of channel enlargement on Saline River, 1.2 miles of clearing and cleaning, and 29.8 miles of channel enlargement on North Fork, 12.2 miles of channel enlargement on Middle Fork, and 14.2 miles of clearing and cleaning on South Fork. Project will protect agricultural areas along 67.3 miles of improved channel from headwater floods with an expected frequency of once in 2 years, and lesser floods occurring more frequently. Project was authorized by 1958 Flood Control Act, and deletion of cash contributions by local interests was authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act. Estimated total cost of new work (1981) is $8,817,200, of which $991,000 is non- Federal cost for lands and damages, and bridge and utility relocations. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936 as amended, applies. Saline Valley Conservancy District furnished assurances of cooperation on March 2, 1966. Authorizations- of-entry for all sections of project have been furnished. Operations and results during fiscal year. Contract for additional South Fork clearing completed. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is 100 percent complete. South Fork Saline River, Section 6 was transferred to the Saline Valley Conservancy District for maintenance in November 1980. 13. SOUTHWESTERN JEFFERSON COUNTY, KY Location. In Jefferson County, KY, on left bank of Ohio River from Mile 616 to 628.6. 24-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 Existing project. Provides for the construction of 68,500 feet of levee, 1,550 feet of concrete wall, four pumping plants, and other necessary appurtenances. Project will provide protection to 24,100 acres against Ohio River floods equal to 1937 flood of record with 3-foot freeboard. Estimated cost of new work (1981) is $74,781,000, of which $65,050,000 is Federal, $9,731,000 is non-Federal. Project was authorized under Flood Control Act of August 1968. Recreation as a project purpose has been deferred until such time as a water quality problem on Pond Creek is corrected. Local cooperation. Section 3 Flood Control Act of 1936 as amended applies. In addition, local interests must agree to administer project land and water areas for recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement; and to pay, contribute in kind or repay (which may be through user fees) with interest, one-half of the separable first cost of the project allocated to recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of lands and facilities for recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement. Jefferson County Fiscal Court expressed intent to fulfill requirement by resolution dated April 4, 1967. Formal assurances of local cooperation for the flood protection portion of the project were executed by resolution of Jefferson County Fiscal Court, adopted September 17, 1971, and assurances for the recreation portion of the project were executed by similar resolution, adopted September 14, 1971. Authorization-of-entry for levee and floodwall sections 1, 2, 3 and 4A have been furnished. Operations and results during fiscal year. Engineering studies continued. Contracts for construction of levee and floodwall Section 3 and Riverport and Lower Mill Creek pumping plants were completed. Supply contract for pumps and motors for Riverport, Lower Mill Creek, and Upper Mill Creek pumping plants advanced to 95 percent completion. Contracts for relocation of Texas Gas pipeline and Louisville Gas and Electric pipeline advanced to 34 percent and 40 percent complete, respectively. Contract for power service for Riverport and Lower Mill Creek pump plants advanced to 74 percent complete. Contracts for construction of levee and floodwall Section 4A and Upper Mill Creek pumping plant were awarded in February 1981 and July 1981, respectively, and contract for electric service for gatewells was awarded September 1981. Condition at end of fiscal year. Preconstruction planning is complete and engineering studies are about 70 percent complete. Construction of levee and floodwall Sections 1, 2 and 3, Riverport and Lower Mill Creek pumping plants and alteration of waterline at levee and floodwall Sectior) 1 are complete. Project is 34 percent complete overall. Flood Control - Reservoirs 14. BARREN RIVER LAKE, KY Location. Dam is on Barren River, 79.5 miles above its confluence with Green River and 10 miles northeast of Scottsville, KY. At flood control pool, reservoir extends upstream about 40 miles in Barren and Allen Counties, KY. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Lucas, KY. Existing project. Reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is rolled earth and rockfill, 146 feet high and 3,970 feet long, with gate-contolled outlet works and uncontrolled upen-cut spillway. Total storage capacity is 815,200 acre-feet (768,600 for flood control and 46,600 for water supply storage). For further details, see page 1125 of Annual Report for 1962. Estimated cost of new work (1981) is $27,479,717 including $2,335,056 Federal funds and $108,418 non-Federal funds for construction of recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Project was authorized by Flood Control Act of 1938. Local cooperation. None required by authorizing act. Under provision of Water Supply Act of 1958, contract with City of Glasgow for water supply storage was approved by Secretary of Army on October 4, 1965. Terms require City to pay $23,433, which is project cost allocated to water storage plus capitalized prepayment of proportionate share of operation, maintenance, and major replacement costs. A contract with the Commonwealth of Kentucky for development of additional campsites, shoreline protection and breakwater extension at Barren River Lake State Park under the cost-sharing category of the completed projects program was approved by the Secretary of the Army November 4, 1977. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Contract for construction of water pollution control facilities at Site 6, The Narrows was completed under the completed projects program. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control during the 1981 flood season prevented damages of $6,143,000. Conditions at end of fiscal year. Construction started in March 1960 and all major construction and relocation items were completed in October 1964. Project was placed in operation in March 1964. Land acquisition complete. 24-6 LOUISVILLE, KY, DISTRICT 15. BROOKVILLE LAKE, IN Location. Damsite is on East Fork of Whitewater River, 2.4 miles above confluence with West Fork, and about 1-1/2 miles north of Brookville, Indiana. The reservoir lies in Franklin and Union Counties, Indiana. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Brookville, IN.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is earthfill, 182 feet high and 3,004 feet long, with gate-controlled outlet works, and uncontrolled open spillway. Total storage capacity is 359,600 acre-feet (214,700 for flood control, 89,300 for water supply and 35,500 for conservation). A minimum pool of 20,100 acre-feet is maintained. Estimated cost of new work (1981) is $66,602,000 of which $37,900,000 is Federal cost and $7,592,000 is non-Federal contribution for water supply storage and $21,110,000 for construction of recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Project was authorized by 1938 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required by authorizing act. Contract with State of Indiana for water supply storage under provisions of Water Supply Act of 1958 was approved by Secretary of Army, August 5, 1965. Under terms of contract, State paid initial costs allocated to water supply feature of project plus capitalized prepayment of proportionate share of operation and maintenance costs. Operation and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering studies continued. Contract* for sewage force mains was completed. Maintenance: Contract for installation of hydropower unit awarded and advanced to 60 percent completion. Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control during the 1981 flood season prevented damages estimated at $13,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction started in November 1965 is about 98 percent complete, overall. All major construction and relocation items are complete except connection of recreation facilities to a regional sewer system. Land acquisition is complete and the project was placed in operation January 1974. 16. BUCKHORN LAKE, KY Location. Dam is on Middle Fork of Kentucky River, 43.4 miles above mouth, and 0.5 mile upstream from Buckhorn, Perry County, KY. Reservoir extends upstream about 34 miles and lies in Leslie and Perry Counties, Kentucky. (See U. S. Geological Survey map of Buckhorn, KY.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and recreation. Dam is earth and rockfill type, with gate controlled outlet works. Total storage capacity is 168,000 acre-feet, of which 157,600 acre-feet is for flood control For further details, see page 1120 of Annual Report for 1962. Estimated cost of new work (1981) is $11,766,206 including $386,707 for construction of recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Existing project was authroized by general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1928 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. Department of Parks of Commonwealth of Kentucky has undertaken management of lands and recreational facilities in accordance with license granted by Secretary of the Army on June 29, 1962. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Contract for stabilization of rock wall in operations area awarded. Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control during the 1981 flood season prevented damages estimated at $361,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction started in September 1956 and project was placed in operation in August 1960. All construction and land acquisition is complete. 17. CAESAR CREEK LAKE, OH Location. Damsite is on Caesar Creek, about 3.0 miles above its confluence with Little Miami River, in Warren County, Ohio, about 3.9 miles southeast of Waynesville, Ohio, and 10.5 miles northeast of Lebanon, Ohio. Reservoir lies in Warren, Clinton, and Green Counties, Ohio. (See U. S. Geological Survey map of Oregonia, OH.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. It includes an earth and rockfill dam, four saddle dams, outlet works and an uncontrolled saddle spillway. Total storage capacity of reservoir is 242,200 acre-feet, of which 148,500 acre-feet is reserved for flood control storage. Estimated cost of new work (1981) is $79,896,000 including $4,991,000 non-Federal reimbursement for water supply storage and $15,233,000 for construction of recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Existing project was authorized by general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required. However, the State of Ohio requested inclusion in the project of storage for' future municipal and industrial water supply uses. Contract with State of Ohio for water supply storage under provisions of Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, was approved by Secretary of the Army, May 20, 1970. Under terms of contract, State will reimburse the Federal Government for costs allocated to 24-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 water supply storage over a period not to exceed 50 years after use of this storage is initiated plus estimated annual amount for cost of operation, maintenance and major capital replacements required for the water supply facilities. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design studies continued. One tract of land was acquired and final condemnation action for land acquisition on one re.maining tract continued. Relocation contract for Allegheny Pipeline Co. facilities and four contracts for dam area recreation and outlet channel improvements, Furnas Shores beach house and shelters, Mounds Ridge camp area buildings and utilities and O'Neal Gorge access road were completed. Three contracts for construction of service/maintenance center; power service to Wellman Meadows; and regional visitors center were advanced to 95 percent, 65 percent and 93 percent, respectively. Contract for sewer connection charge with Warren County was awarded in September 1981. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control during the 1981 flood season prevented damages of $153,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Engineering studies are 96 percent complete. All land required for project has been acquired except final condemnation action on one tract. All major relocation and construction features are complete except final recreation items and visitor center. Permanent impoundment was started and project was placed in operation in January 1978. Project is about 90 percent complete overall. 18. CAGLES MILL LAKE, IN Location. Dam is on Mill Creek, 2.8 miles above its confluence with Eel River, in Putnam County, IN, and about 25 miles east of Terre Haute, IN. Reservoir extends upstream about 11 miles and is in Putnam and Owen Counties, In. (See U. S. Geological Survey map of Poland, IN.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and recreation. Dam is earth and rockfill embankment. Total storage capacity is 228,100 acre-feet, of which 201,000 acre-feet are for flood control. For details see Annual Report for 1962, page 1136. Estimated cost of new work (1981) is $4,603,582 including $265,814 Federal funds and $230,000 non-Federal funds for construction of recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Existing project was selected for construction under general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required. State of Indiana has undertaken development and management of recreation facilities for use of the public in reservoir area in accordance with license granted by Secretary of the Arr ly on January 17, 1952. A contract with the Ir diana Department of Natural Resources for expanding the boat ramp and parking area at Site 3, Lieber State Park under the cost sharing category of the completed projects program has been signed by the State of Indiana and submitted for signature of Secretary of the Army. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Planning was begun for construction of ramp and parking area at Site 3, Lieber State Park under the cost sharing category of the completed projects program. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control during the 1981 flood season prevented damages of $2,334,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction started in July 1948 and completed in June 1953. 19. CAMP GROUND LAKE, KY Location. The damsite is in central Kentucky on Beech Fork, about 49.1 miles above its confluence with Rolling Fork, which stream is a tributary to Salt River, in Washington County about 11 miles northeast of Bardstown and about 34 miles southeast of Louisville, KY. (See U. S. Geological Survey map of Maud, KY.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. The project consists of a' rolled-earth dam with an uncontrolled open-cut, spillway through the left abutment, and a gate controlled outlet conduit. A detached dam is required in a saddle between the main dam and the spillway. Total storage capacity will be 360,740 acre-feet for flood control, water supply, water quality and recreationr. Estimated cost of new work (1981) is $124,227,000 of which $113,047,000 would be reimbursed by non-Federal interests. Project was authorized for Phase I design memorandum stage of advanced engineering and design by the Water Resources Development Act of 1974 (Section 1). Local cooperation. Local interests must agree to administer project lands, facilities, and water areas for recreation, including fish and wildlife enhancement; pay, contribute in kind, or repay (which may be through user fees) with interest, no less than one-half of the separable first costs allocated to recreation; bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of fish and wildlife and recreation use lands and facilities; repay all cost allocated to water supply; effect proper measures for control of pollution at the source to assure the effectiveness of the water quality storage provided; exercise, to the full extent of their legal capability, control against removal of stream-flow resulting from the reservoir storage provided for water quality control; prevent encroachment of flow-carrying 24-8 LOUISVILLE, KY, DISTRICT capacities of stream channels below the reservoir to the extent needed to provide reasonably effective reservoir operations; and periodically (at least annually) notify interests affected that the project will not provide complete flood protection and that backwater floods from the Ohio River will not be substantially reduced by the project. Operations and results during fiscal year. None. Condition at end of fiscal year. Brief Report on Economics recommending continuation of Phase I studies was completed and approved May 29, 1979. This project is no longer funded under the Construction General appropriation category. The supplemental preauthorization study has been assigned to the General Investigation appropriation category. Construction has not started. 20. CARR FORK LAKE, KY Location. Damsite is 8.8 miles above mouth of Carr Fork, a tributary of North Fork of Kentucky River, 16 miles upstream from Hazard, Kentucky. The reservoir lies entirely within Knott County. (See U. S. Geological Survey maps of Carrie and Vicco, KY.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is rock and earth fill with impervious core, 720 feet long and 130 feet high, with uncontrolled open-cut spillway through left abutment. Outlet works has two control gates and 8-foot diameter conduit to stilling basin. Total storage capacity is 47,700 acre-feet (31,600 for flood control and 4,300 for water quality control). A higher level seasonal pool for recreation is provided. Estimated Federal cost of new work (1980) is $49,340,100 including $2,643,000 for recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Project was authorized by the 1962 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required for reservoir project. Division of Flood Control and Water Usage of Commonwealth of Kentucky gave assurance that encroachments on downstream channel capacity will be prevented. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design studies continued. Real estate administrative action required for acquisition of remaining tracts was continued. Multi-component contract for relocation of Sassafras Bridge, Knott County Road 1089, construction of spillway access road and remedial work at recreation sites advanced to 98 percent complete. Construction by hired labor, of sanitary dump station for boats, in conformance with EPA and State standards, continued at Irishman Creek site under the completed projects program. Maintenance: Contract awarded for resurfacing road in operations area. Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control during the 1981 flood season prevented damages of $25,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction started in January 1966. All land required for the project has been acquired. All relocation and construction items are complete except remedial work on a highway bridge, access road and certain recreation facilities. Project was placed in operation January 1976 and is 99 percent complete overall. 21. CAVE RUN LAKE, KY Location. Damsite is on Licking River, about 4 miles upstream from U. S. Highway 60 near Farmers, Kentucky, and 7 miles southwest of Morehead, Kentucky. Reservoir will be in Rowan, Bath, Morgan, and Menifee Counties, Kentucky. (See U. S. Geological Survey maps of Salt Lick and Morehead, KY.) Existing project. Plan provides for construction of a reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is rolled earthfill, with gate controlled outlet works and uncontrolled open spillway. Total storage capacity is 614,100 acre-feet (438,500 for flood control and 28,300 for water quality control). Estimated Federal cost of new work (1981) is $110,084,000 of which $31,769,000 is U. S. Forest Service cost. Project was authorized by Flood Control Acts of June 22, 1936, and June 28, 1938. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal'year. New work:- Engineering and design studies continued. Real estate administrative action required for acquisition of remaining tracts, was continued. Contracts for construction of recreation roads and utilities at Zilpo, repairs to Kentucky Highway 772 bridge, and tailwater landscaping were completed. Contract for construction of Highway 801 recreation facilities advanced to 87 percent completion. Contracts for paving recreation areas and Zilpo recreation area, Part I were awarded in April 1981 and July 1981, respectively. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control during the 1981 flood season prevented damages of $2,707,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction started in June 1965. Land acquisition is complete except for outstanding condemnation actions involving 16 tracts. All relocation and construction features are complete except reme- 24-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 dial work on control tower and recreation facilities. Project has been in operation since February 1974 and is about 83 percent complete overall. 22. CECIL M. HARDEN LAKE, IN Location. Dam is on Raccoon Creek, 32.4 miles above its confluence with Wabash River, and 25 miles northeast of Terre Haute, IN. At flood control pool, reservoir extends upstream about 15 miles in Parke and Putnam Counties, Indiana. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Mansfield, IN.) Existing project. A rolled earth dam and reservoir, for flood control and allied purposes. Total storage capacity is 132,800 acre-feet of which 116,600 acre-feet are for flood control. For details, see Annual Report for 1962, page 1132. Estimated Federal cost of new work (1981) is $7,037,794 including $398,672 Federal funds and $378,988 non-Federal funds for construction of recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Project was selected for construction under general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. Project name was changed from Mansfield Lake to Cecil M. Hardin Lake by Public Law 93-521, December 14, 1974. Local cooperation. State of Indiana has undertaken management of lands and recreational facilities in accordance with license granted by Secretary of the Army on April 19, 1961. A contract with the Indiana Department of Natural Resources, approved by the Secretary of the Army in May 1974, provided for that agency to design and construct certain additional recreation facilities at Cecil M. Harden, Huntington, Mississinewa, Monroe and Salamonie Lakes under the cost sharing category of the completed projects program. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Boundary monumentation continued. Routine maintenance was performed. Flood damages of $2,037,000 were prevented during the 1981 flood season. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction started in October 1956 and all major items of work were completed December 1961. Land acquisition is complete. Project has been in operation since August 1960. 23. CLARENCE J. BROWN DAM & RESERVOIR, OH Location. Damsite is just east of Springfield, Clark County, Ohio, at Mile 7.3 of Buck Creek, a tributary of Mad River. (See U.S. Geological Survey maps of New Moorefield and Springfield, KY.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. It includes an earthfill dam, 6,620 feet long and 72 feet high, with gated outlet works and open cut spillway with concrete chute through right abutment. Total storage capacity of reservoir is 63,700 acre-feet (32,900 for flood control and 20,800 for water quality control). Federal cost of completed project (1981) is $22,083,700. Project was authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act. Project name was changed from Buck Creek Dam and Reservoir to Clarence J. Brown Dam and Reservoir by Public Law 90-46, July 4, 1967. Local cooperation. Assurances from City of Springfield, Springfield Conservancy District, and Clark County, Ohio, covering protection against detrimental channel encroachment below dam to mouth of Buck Creek, were accepted March 5, 1964. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Flood damages of $340,000 were prevented during the 1981 flood season. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction started in September 1966. Land acquisition and all major project features were completed in November 1973. The project was placed in operation in January 1974. 24. FALMOUTH LAKE, KY Location. The damsite is on the Licking River, about 60.6 miles upstream from its confluence with the Ohio River. This site, in Pendleton County, is about 9 miles above Falmouth, KY, about 35 miles south of Cincinnati, Ohio and about 50 miles north of Lexington, KY. The lake area lies in Pendleton, Bath, Bracken, Fleming, Harrison, Nicholas and Robertson Counties. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Kelat, KY.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam will be earth and rockfill about 1,320 feet long and 147 feet maximum height with an uncontrolled open-cut spillway through the right abutment and a gate controlled outlet conduit through the base of the dam. Total storage capacity will be 898,300 acrefeet, of which 648,600 acre-feet will be for flood control. Estimated cost of new work (1979) is $131,000,000, all Federal cost. The project was authorized by the Flood Control Acts of 1936 and 1938. Local cooperation. Local interests must agree to administer project lands and water areas for recreation; pay, contribute in kind, or repay 24-10 LOUISVILLE, KY, DISTRICT (which may be through user fees) with interest, one-half of the separable cost of the project allocated to recreation; bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of recreation facilities provided the sizing and responsibility for development, operation, maintenance and replacement of recreation features of the reservoir may be modified in accordance with the alternatives cited in the Federal Project Recreation Act, dependent on the intentions of non- Federal interests regarding participation in costs of this feature at the time of construction and subsequent thereto. Operations and results during fiscal year. None. Presconstruction engineering anddesign studies were resumed in October 1977. An Architect Engineer contract for hydropower study that was awarded in September 1978 was terminated. Schedule indefinite pending State decision on participation in recreation. Letter from Governor requested delay until 1980 General Assembly could consider. Project was reclassified from the "active" to the "inactive" category January 13, 1981. Condition at end of fiscal year. Special Report and Design Memorandum, Hydrology & Hydraulics are complete. Construction has not started. Project is classified in the "inactive" category. 25. GREEN RIVER LAKE, KY Location. Damsiteis 305.7 miles above mouth of Green River in Taylor County, KY, about 8 miles south of Campbellsville. Reservoir lies in Taylor and Adair Counties. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Cane Valley, KY.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is earth and rock fill, 141 feet high and 2,350 feet long. Outlet works is slide gate-controlled and spillway open and uncontrolled. Total storage capacity is 723,200 acre-feet (560,600 for flood control and 64,500 for low-flow augmentation). Estimated cost of new work (1981) is $33,609,163, including $317,232 Federal funds and $186,747 non-Federal funds for construction of recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Existing project was authorized under general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required by authorizing act. Taylor County, by lease approved by Secretary of Army February 15,1968, undertook operation and maintenance of Smith Ridge public access area. In May 1980, the lease was amended to turn back responsibility for maintenance and operation of 99 percent of the site to the Corps, with the County retaining responsibility for the marina area. Under provision of Water Supply Act of 1958, contract with City of Campbellsville for water supply storage was approved by Secretary of Army April 23, 1969. Terms require city to repay, with interest and annual charges for operation, maintenance and major replacement, the investment cost of $85,765 allocated to its water supply storage space. Total payments received through fiscal year 1981, $16,228. The Department of Parks of the Commonwealth of Kentucky, by lease approved by Secretary of Army, October 4, 1971, has undertaken the management of the Lone Valley public access area. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Hired labor construction of sanitary dump station for boats at Dam Site in conformance with EPA and State standards and rehabilitation of sewage treatment facilities, washhouses and restrooms at Smith Ridge site were continued under the completed projects program. Maintenance: Contract awarded for resurfacing recreation road at Dam Site. Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control prevented damages estimated at $6,019,000 during the 1981 flood season. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in August 1965 and all major construction and relocation items were completed in 1972. Project has been in operation since February 1969. Project including all land acquisition complete in 1973. 26. HUNTINGTON LAKE, IN Location. Damsite is on Wabash River, about 2 miles from Huntington, IN, and 411.4 miles above mouth. Reservoir is in Huntington and Wells Counties, IN. (See U.S. Geological Survey maps of Majenica and Mt. Etna, KY.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and recreation. Dam consists of a rolled earth embankment 4,700 feet long and 89 feet high, a concrete spillway and outlet section 155 feet long, and a concrete gravity section 310 feet long. Spillway is controlled by three gates, and outlet works by six sluices. Project also provides local flood protection for Markle, IN. Total storage capacity of reservoir is 153,100 acre-feet, of which 149,000 acre-feet is reserved for flood control storage. Estimated project cost for new work (1981) is $19,893,664, of which $19,490,813 is Federal cost and $402,851 non-Federal responsibility, including recreation facilities under completed projects program. Project was authorized by Flood Control Act of 1958. Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute in cash amount equal to one percent of 24-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 project first cost. State of Indiana has met this obligation. Contract with the Indiana Department of Natural Resources, approved by the Secretary of the Army May 17, 1974, provided for that agency to design and construct certain additional recreational facilities at Cecil M. Harden, Huntington, Mississinewa, Monroe and Salamonie Lakes under the cost shared category of the completed projects program. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Planning for additional cost shared recreation development under the completed projects program was continued. Indiana Department of Natural Resources continued construction of additional cost shared development under the same program at Little Turtle and Kil-So-Quah recreation areas. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control prevented damages estimated at $7,292,000 during the 1981 flood season. Condition at end of fiscal year. Land acquisition and all major construction complete. Project was placed in operation January 9, 1969. 27. LOUISVILLE LAKE, IL Location. Damsite is on the Little Wabash River 164.8 miles above the mouth and about 3.5 miles northwest of Louisville, and 23 miles south of Effingham, IL. The lake area lies in Clay and Effingham Counties. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Edgewood, IL.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. The project will consist of a gate-controlled concrete overflow spillway section located at the face of the right abutment flanked by random rock and earth fill embankment with impervious center core extending across the valley to the left abutment. A small dike along the right abutment parallels the existing railroad. Total length of dam is about 21,400 feet with a maximum height of 69 feet. Total storage capacity is 230,769 acre-feet, of which 168,531 acre-feet will be for flood control. Estimated Federal cost of new work (1981) is $108,694,000, including $2,347,000 for recreation facilities under the completed projects program, and $15,604,000 reimbursable by non- Federal interests for water supply and recreation. Project was authorized by 1968 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. Local interests must agree to administer project land and water areas for recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement; pay, contribute in kind, or repay with interest (which may be through user fees) one-half the separable costs allocated to recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement; bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of recreation fish and wildlife lands and facilities; reimburse the allocated construction costs allocated to water supply storage; bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of water supply storage facilities; prevent channel encroachments tending to reduce present channel capacities; hold and save the United States free from damages from water rights claims resulting from construction and operation of the reservoir; exercise, to the full extent of their legal capability, control against removal from stream flow made available by reservoir storage for water quality control purposes; and contribute to the control of pollution of the stream subject to low-flow augmentation by adequate treatment or other methods of controlling wastes at their source. The State of Illinois will be the responsible cooperating agency for all required assurance. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning was continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Design Memoranda, Hydrology and Hydraulics, Draft and Final General Design Memorandum, Phase I, Plan Formulation and Appendices and Final Environmental Impact Statement are complete. Relocation of U.S. Route 45 (Advance Participation) is complete. 28. MISSISSINEWA LAKE, IN Location. Damsite is 7.1 miles above mouth of Mississinewa River, which flows into Wabash River about 2 miles upstream from Peru, IN. At flood control pool level, reservoir extends upstream about 28 miles, in Wabash, Grant, and Miami Counties, IN. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Peoria, IN.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. It includes an earthfill dam 137 feet high and 8,100 feet long, gate-controlled outlet works, and an uncontrolled open spillway through right abutment. Total storage capacity of reservoir is 368,400 acre-feet, of which 345,100 acre-feet are reserved for flood control storage. Estimated project cost for new work (1981) is $24,614,943, of which $23,981,438 is Federal cost and $633,505 non-Federal responsibility including recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Project was authorized by Flood Control Act of 1958. Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute in cash an amount equal to 1 percent of project first cost. State of Indiana assumed this obligation. A contract with the Indiana Department of Natural Resources, approved by the Secretary of the Army in May 1974, provided for that agency to design and construct certain additional recreation facilities at Cecil M. Harden, 24-12 LOUISVILLE, KY, DISTRICT Huntington, Mississinewa, Monroe and Salamonie Lakes under the cost sharing category of the completed projects program. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Continued construction of additional cost shared recreation development at Miami and Frances Slocum sites under the completed projects program. Maintenance: Contract awarded for repair of service bridge. Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control prevented damages of $7,618,000 during 1981 flood season. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction and land acquisiton is complete. Project was placed in operation in May 1968. 29. MONROE LAKE, IN Location. Dam is on Salt Creek, a tributary of White River, 25.9 miles above mouth, and 2 miles east of Harrodsburg, Monroe County, IN. At flood control pool level, reservoir will extend upstream 44 miles in Monroe, Brown, and Jackson Counties. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Clear Creek, IN.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is earth core and rock shell, with gate-controlled outlet works and uncontrolled open spillway. Total storage capacity is 441,000 acre-feet (258,800 is for flood control and 159,900 for low flow augmentation). Estimated cost of new work (1981) is $16,619,473, of which $8,015,323 is non-Federal contribution for low-flow regulation storage and $895,285 Federal funds and $894,100 non-Federal funds for construction of recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Project was authorized by 1958 Flood Control Act, modifying comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Local cooperation. Section 3, 1944 Flood Control Act applies. Local interests must contribute 54.1 percent of project cost, this being the proportion allocated to low-flow regulation feature, plus a capitalized amount representing that part of average annual maintenance and operation cost allocated to low-flow regulation. State of Indiana assumed this cost sharing obligation. A contract with the Indiana Department of Natural Resources, approved by the Secretary of Army in May 1974, provided for that agency to design and construct certain additional recreation facilities at Cecil M. Harden, Huntington, Mississinewa, Monroe and Salamonie Lakes under the cost sharing category of the completed projects program. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Construction of additional cost shared recreation development at Fairfax, Paynetown, and Moores Creek sites under the completed projects program was completed. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control prevented damages of $943,000 during 1981 flood season. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete and was placed in operation in February 1965. 30. NOLIN LAKE, KY Location. Dam is on Nolin River 7.8 miles above its confluence with Green River, about 70 air miles southwest of Louisville, KY. Reservoir extends upstream about 57 miles and is in Edmonson, Grayson, Hart, and Hardin Counties, KY. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Nolin Reservoir and Dickeys Mill, KY.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is rockfill-earth core type, with gate-controlled outlet works, and uncontrolled open spillway. Total storage capacity is 609,400 acre-feet, of which 545,600 acrefeet is for flood control. For further details of project see Annual Report for 1962, page 1124. Estimated Federal cost of new work (1981) is $17,922,176 including $3,325,113 for construction of recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Project was selected for construction under general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required for authorized project. State of Kentucky contributed $18,195 for increased width of dam for public road. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design studies completed for upgrading sanitary facilities at Dog Creek site and construction continued by hired labor on sanitary dump station for boats at Moutardier site in conformance with EPA and State standards, under the completed projects program. Maintenance: Contracts awarded for resurfacing roads in tailwater area and modification of control tower gate hoist equipment. Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control during the 1981 flood season prevented damages estimated at $1,644,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction started in January 1959. Project was completed and placed in operation in March 1963. 31. OHIO RIVER BASIN (Louisville District) Location. Works covered by this project are a series of levees, floodwalls, channel improvements, and reservoirs in Ohio River Basin within Louisville District. 24-13 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 Existing project. Individual projects considered in comprehensive plan within the Louisville District. (See Table 24-B for authorizing legislation, Table 24-G for local protection projects, and Table 24-H for reservoir projects.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Only minor costs were incurred except for those projects for which individual reports are given. Economic report for South Frankfort, KY, was completed in 1981 and served to reclassify that section of the authorized Frankfort, Ky, project to the "active" category. Condition at end of fiscal year. Surveys, explorations, engineering studies, and preparation of detailed plans were well advanced for those units in general comprehensive plan for flood control in Ohio River Basin which are under consideration for construction in the near future. Status of projects selected for construction is given in individual reports. Economic reports on Bonpas Creek, IL (Wabash River Basin) and Russell and Allison Levee, Wabash River, IL are complete under Restudy of Deferred Projects, General Investigations Appropriation. 32. PATOKA LAKE, IN Location. Damsite is in Dubois County, IN, 118.3 miles above mouth of Patoka River, and 50 miles west-northwest of New Albany, IN. Reservoir extends into Dubois, Orange and Crawford Counties. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Cuzco, IN.) Existing project. Reservoir for flood control and allied purpcses. Dam is earth and rock fill, 1,550 feet long and 85 feet high, with gatecontrolled outlet works and uncontrolled open spillway. Total storage capacity is 301,600 acrefeet (121,000 for flood control and 167,500 for water supply and water quality control). Estimated cost of new work (1981) is $80,362,000, of which $1,300,000 is Federal cost for emergency remedial measures and to clear and snag the Patoka River downstream of Patoka Lake, which work was directed by Congress as set forth below, $53,077,000 is Federal cost for other construction including recreation facilities under completed projects program, and $25,985,000 is non-Federal contribution for water supply storage and recreation facilities. Project was authorized by 1965 Flood Control Act, and emergency measures and snagging and clearing the Patoka River downstream of Patoka Lake to insure effective operation of the project for flood control was directed by 1981 Appropriation Act for Energy and Water Development. Local cooperation. Local interests are required to reimburse the Federal Government for costs allocated to water supply storage over a period not to exceed 50 years after use of this storage is initiated, presently estimated at 29.316 percent of the joint-use facilities cost, exclusive of interests, plus $287,000 for the cost of operating and maintaining water supply storage for a period of 50 years, plus $42,000 for the cost of major capital replacements required for water supply storage space for a period of 50 years. Local interests are also required to pay, contribute in kind, or repay (which may be through user fees) with interest, one-half of the separable first cost project allocated to recreation. Present laws of the State of Indiana require that agency make cash contributions during construction of the project. Local interests must also agree to prevent encroachments on channel of Patoka River from dam to mouth, and to pay allocated initial and annual maintenance and operation costs for water supply storage. Formal assurances of local cooperation, executed by the Indiana Natural Resources Commission, were accepted August 27, 1970. Contracts with State of Indiana for water supply and recreation were approved by the Secretary of the Army November 2, 1970. Operations and results during fiscal year. Engineerin.g studies continued. Acquired 4 tracts of land. Three contracts for construction of access facilities, utilities and recreation buildings (beach house and shelters) at Newton- Steward site, and four contracts for relocation of Dubois County Road, D-1, part 2, Jackson access road, landscaping access facilities, and construction of recreation roads at the dam and overlook site were completed. Three utility relocation contracts for Orange County REMC, Indiana Telephone Corporation, and Public Service of Indiana continued. Emergency remedial measures and snagging and clearing the Patoka River, that is being accomplished with leased equipment and hired labor, was advanced to about 44 percent completion. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control during the 1981 flood season prevented damage estimated at $709,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was started in July 1972. Engineering studies are about 99 percent complete. 503 tracts of land of an estimated 512 required for the project have been acquired. Construction of all relocations are complete, except minor remedial repairs to the relocated roads. All other major features with the exception of recreation facilities are also complete. Permanent impoundment was started in February 1978 and the project was placed in operation about August 1980. The project is about 97 percent complete overall. 24-14 LOUISVILLE, KY, DISTRICT 33. ROUGH RIVER LAKE AND CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, KY Location. Dam is on Rough River, 89.3 miles above its confluence with Green River 160.3 miles above Ohio River, and about 60 miles southwest of Louisville, KY. Reservoir extends upstream about 30 miles and is in Breckinridge, Hardin, and Grayson Counties, KY. Channel improvement work is on Rough River, Barnett Creek, and West Fork of Barnett Creek. (See U.S. Geological Survey maps of McDaniels and Falls of Rough, KY.) Existing project. Reservoir is for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is rolled earthfill type, with gate-controlled outlet works. Storage capacity is 334,380 acre-feet, of which 314,210 acrefeet is for flood control. Project also includes channel clearing of lower Rough River, and channel improvement on Barnett Creek, a tributary of Rough River. For further details see page 1126 of Annual Report for 1962. Estimated 'cost of new work (1981) is $11,265,009 including $1,512,016 Federal funds and $22,612 non-Federal funds for construction of recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Existing project was selected for construction under general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. Modification of previously approved plan to include channel improvement items was authorized by the 1944 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required for construction of reservoir unit. Provisions of Section 3, Flood Control Act of 1936, are applicable to channel improvements. Assurances obtained from Ohio County for channel improvement. Department of Parks, Commonwealth of Kentucky, has undertaken management of certain lands and recreation facilities in accordance with license granted by Secretary of the Army on August 18, 1961. A contract with the Commonwealth of Kentucky to improve and pave road at the Below Dam Area - State Park under the cost sharing category of the completed projects program was approved by the Secretary of the Army November 4, 1977. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design studies completed for upgrading sanitary facilities at Laurel Branch site and construction continued by hired labor on sanitary dump station for boats at North Fork site in conformance with EPA and State standards under the completed projects program. Maintenance: Contract to repair retreat channel was completed and two contracts for modification of lift station and repair to boat ramp at North Fork site were awarded. Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control during the 1981 flood season prevented damages estimated at $2,071,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction started in November 1955 and reservoir was placed in operation in June 1959. Land acquisition and all major items of construction and relocation are complete. 34. SALAMONIE LAKE, IN Location. Damsite is 3.1 miles above mouth of Salamonie River which enters Wabash River about 6 miles upstream from Wabash, IN. Reservoir extends upstream about 27 miles at flood control pool and lies in Wabash and Huntington Counties, IN. (See U.S. Geological Survey maps of Largo and Majenica, IN.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. It includes an earthfill dam with a maximum height of 133 feet and a length of 6,100 feet, gate-controlled outlet works with a 16-foot diameter conduit and an uncontrolled open spillway through right abutment. Total storage capacity of reservoir is 263,600 acre-feet, of which 250,500 acre-feet is for flood control storage. Estimated project cost for new work (1981) is $17,044,819, of which $16,559,216 is Federal cost and $485,603 is non-Federal responsibility including recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Project was authorized by Flood Control Act of 1958. Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute in cash an amount equal to one percent of project first cost. State of Indiana assumed this obligation. A contract with the Indiana Department of Natural Resources, approved by the Secretary of the Army in May 1974, provided for that agency to design and construct certain additional recreation facilities at Cecil M. Harden, Huntington, Mississinewa, Monroe, and Salamonie Lakes under the cost sharing category of the completed projects program. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Completed construction of additional cost shared recreation development at the Dora- New Holland and Lost Bridge sites under the completed projects program. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. During the 1981 flood season, operation for flood control prevented damages of $6,986,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Land acquisition and all major construction and relocation contracts are complete. Reservoir was placed in operation in spring 1967. Contract with the State of Indiana for additional cost shared recreation development under the completed projects program was approved by the Secretary of the Army May 17, 1974. 24-15 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 35. TAYLORSVILLE LAKE, KY Location. Damsite is in Spencer County, KY, 60.0 miles above the confluence of Salt River and Ohio River, 4 river miles above Taylorsville and 36.9 river miles above Shepherdsville, KY. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Taylorsville, KY.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam will be an earth and rock fill structure, 164 feet high and 1,280 feet long. Outlet works will be slide gate controlled and spillway will be uncontrolled open cut. Total storage capacity will be 291,670 acre-feet (211,230 for flood control, winter months), and 52,245 for water quality and fish and wildlife. Estimated Federal cost of new work (1981) is $99,623,000, of which $5,138,000 is for recreation facilities under the completed projects program, and $18,613,000 is non-Federal responsibility for recreation facilities. Project was authorized by 1966 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. Local interests must agree to administer project land and water areas for recreation; pay, contribute in kind, or repay (which may be through user fees) with interest one-half of the separable first costs of the project allocated to recreation; bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of recreation lands and facilities. Local interests must also agree to prevent encroachments on flowcarrying capacities of stream channels below the reservoir to the extent needed to provide reasonably effective reservoir operation. Commonwealth of Kentucky has indicated intent to fulfill requirements for recreation cost sharing and has assumed responsibility for channel encroachments and pollution control. The Commonwealth furnished assurance agreements covering prevention of encroachment on capacity of stream channels in April and May 1973 and executed the recreation cost sharing contract in April 1973. On April 2, 1980 the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Kentucky ruled that the 1973 recreation cost sharing contract between the Commonwealth and the United States that provided for repayment after completion was invalid under the Kentucky Constitution which prohibits one General Assembly from obligating future appropriations that would be binding on a subsequent legislature. In response to the Court's ruling, the Commonwealth and the United States entered into a new contract providing for cash contributions. Contract was approved by the Secretary of the Army June 11, 1980. The contract was found to be valid and enforceable by the Court July 14, 1980. Operations and results during fiscal year. Engineering and design studies continued. Acquired 64 tracts of land. Contracts for relocatie n of Spencer County road, S-1, S-3A and S-3B, landscaping shop and office area and pool clearing, Part I were completed. Contracts for relocation of Kentucky Highway 248, Site B-2, construction of dam and spillway, relocation of Salt River RECC and Fox Creek RECC advanced to 50 percent, 72 percent, 54 percent and 56 percent complete, respectively. During the 1981 flood season operation for flood control prevented damages of $332,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. General Design Memorandum and other preconstruction planning items are complete. Engineering and design studies are about 72 percent complete. 615 tracts of land of an estimated 691 required for project have been acquired. Construction was started in June 1974 and construction of North, South and Tailwater access roads, outlet works, shop and office building, relocation of Spencer County road, S-1, S-3A and S-3B, cemeteries and log cabins, boundary line marking, landscaping shop and office area and pool clearing, Part I are complete. Project is about 44 percent complete overall. 36.. WABASH RIVER BASIN Location. Works covered by this project are located in the Wabash River Basin, a drainage area of 33,100 square miles, covering parts of Indiana, Illinois and Ohio. Existing project. Individual projects considered in comprehensive plan. (See Table 24-B for authorizing legislation and Table 24-I for projects.) Operations and results during fiscal year. See individual listing for Louisville Lake, IL. Economic restudy of uncompleted Vincennes, IN (Section B, Part 2) was initiated in 1981' and is about 30 percent complete. Condition at end of fiscal year. See individual listing for Louisville Lake, IL. 37. WEST FORK OF MILL CREEK LAKE, OH Location. Dam is on West Fork of Mill Creek 6.5 miles above its junction with Mill Creek and 2 miles northeast of Mount Healthy, Ohio, and 10 miles north of downtown Cincinnati. Reservoir extends upstream about 3 miles and is in Hamilton County, Ohio. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Glendale, OH.) Existing project . An earth embankment dam and a reservoir for flood control, recreation, and reduction of pumping requirements at Mill Creek barrier dam in Cincinnati. Total storage capacity of reservoir is 11,300 acre-feet, of which 9,850 24-16 LOUISVILLE, KY, DISTRICT acre-feet is for flood control. For further details see page 1119 of Annual Report for 1962. Estimated cost of new work (1981) is $6,067,663, including non-Federal cost of $520,800 for sewer relocation and dam, $50,000 non-Federal contribution in fulfillment of project authorization and $1,201,961 Federal funds and $1,201,961 non-Federal funds for construction of recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Existing project selected for construction under additional authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1946 Flood Control Act. Local Cooperation. Local interests were to release necessary land under their control and give assurance that future channel encroachment below damsite would be prevented. For enlargement of reservoir to include a conservation pool, local interests would contribute onehalf additional cost of such pool, including onehalf cost of relocation of sanitary sewer, and agree to hold the United States free from damages resulting from its provision. Board of County Commissioners of Hamilton County, Ohio, adopted a resolution October 8, 1947, signifying willingness to fulfill requirements including provision of conservation pool. Assurances were executed on same date. A contract with the United States for relocation of sanitary sewer outside reservoir area in order to include conservation pool in project was accepted by Hamilton County, in which the United States paid one-half cost of such relocation work. Hamilton County Commissioners furnished $50,000, required as a local contribution toward additional cost of providing conservation pool. Hamilton County Park District has undertaken development and management of recreation facilities in reservoir area for use of the public in accordance with license granted by Secretary of the Army on October 31, 1951. Contract for cost shared recreation development under the completed works program was executed by the Board of Park Commissioners, Hamilton County Park District, Ohio, in September 1975 and approved by the Chief of Engineers in December 1975. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Construction continued for additional cost shared recreation development under the completed projects program. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control during 1981 flood season prevented damages estimated at $14,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction started March 1949 and reservoir was placed in operation in December 1952. Project is complete. 38. WILLIAM H. HARSHA LAKE, OH Location. Damsite is on East Fork of Little Miami River between Batavia and Williamsburg, Ohio, about 6.0 miles above Batavia and 32.6 miles above mouth of the Little Miami River. Entire project lies in Clermont County, Ohio. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Batavia, OH.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. It includes an earthfill dam, outlet works, and uncontrolled saddle spillway and a dike to close a saddle north of spillway. Total storage capacity of reservoir is 294,800 acre-feet, of which 210,600 acre-feet is reserved for flood control storage. Estimated cost of new work (1981) is $75,199,000 including $3,496,000 non-Federal reimbursement for water supply storage and $20,844,000 for construction of recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Existing project was authorized by general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. Project name was changed from East Fork Lake to William H. Harsha Lake effective January 4, 1981 by Public Law 96-383, October 6, 1980. Local cooperation. None required. However, the State of Ohio requested inclusion in the project of storage for future municipal and industrial water supply uses. Contract with State of Ohio for water supply storage under provisions of Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, was approved by Secretary of the Army, May 20, 1970. Under terms of contract, State will reimburse the Federal Government for costs allocated to water supply storage over a period not to exceed 50 years after use of this storage is initiated plus estimated annual amount for cost of operation, maintenance and major capital replacements required for the water supply facilities. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design studies continued. Final condemnation actions for land acquisition on one tract continued. Five contracts for water service - Tate Monroe Association, shop landscaping and construction of recreation buildings at Tate and Greenbrier sites, horizontal drains, vault comfort stations and outlet channel improvements were completed. Three contracts for construction of Tunnel Mill Road, remaining work at North Shore boat ramp, and service maintenance center were advanced to 99 percent, 99 percent, and 95 percent completion, respectively. Contract for changing name on control tower from East Fork Lake to William H. Harsha Lake was awarded and completed. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control during 1981 flood season prevented damages of $188,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was started in May 1970. Engineering studies 24-17 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 are 88 percent complete. All land required for project has been acquired except final condemnation actions on one tract. Major relocation and construction features, except several recreation items are complete. Project is about 91 percent complete overall and was placed in operation in February 1978. 39. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, and subsequent acts require local interests to maintain and operate local protection projects in accordance with regulations prescribed by Secretary of the Army. Inspections were made to determine extent of compliance and to advise interests as necessary to measures required to correct deficiencies. (See Table 24-J for local protection projects and channel improvements inspected.) Fiscal year costs were $209,940. Total costs to September 30, 1981 were $2,043,815. 40. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See Table 24-K. 41. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency flood control activities pursuant to Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation. Costs for fiscal year were $105,617 for disaster preparedness, and $414,495 for repair work on Erie Canal Levee, IN ($45,587), Greenbriar Levee, IL ($30,796), Saint Marie Levee, IL ($63,324), and Tri-County Levee, IL ($274,788). Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, 1948 Flood Control Act, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorized). See Table 24-L. Snagging and clearing navigable streams and tributaries in interest of flood control (Section 208, 1954 Flood Control Act, Public Law 780, 83rd Congress). See Table 24-L. Emergency bank protection (Section 14, 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Congress). 42. STREAMBANK EROSION CONTROL EVALUATION AND DEMONSTRATION ACT OF 1974 Costs for the fiscal year were $128,822 for the three demonstration projects approved for construction with following operations and results. Moscow, Ohio, Ohio River Mile 443. Construction contract for streambank erosion control demonstration project was awarded in June 1979 and advanced to 99 percent completion. Planting of willow seedlings by hired labor is complete. Evaluation Extent Streambank Erosion Nationwide. Evaluation complete. 43. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs were $1,796,141, of which $726 was for one navigation study, $1,123,062 for five flood damage prevention studies, $362,530 for the Wabash River Basin Authorization Report, $90,788 for review of three authorized projects and review for deauthorization, $3,898 for coordination with the Soil Conservation Service, $80,220 for coordination with the Ohio River Basin Commission, $298 for Water Quality Management, $2,095 for technical and engineering assistance on shore and streambank erosion, $108,846 for planning assistance to states, and $23,688 for supplemental preauthorization studies (Phase I) on Camp Ground Lake, KY. 44. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Fiscal year costs were $1,932,297 for inspection of dams and $254,601 for flood plain management services. 45. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT None. 24-18 LOUISVILLE, KY., DISTRICT TABLE 24-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Fiscal Year Project Name Navigation - Lock and Dams 2 Green and Barren New Work Rivers, KY. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 3 Kentucky River, New Work KY. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Minor Rehab. Approp. Cost Flood Control - Local Protection 7 Dayton, KY. New Work Approp. Cost 8 Evansville, IN. New Work Approp. Cost 9 Levee Unit No. 5, New Work Wabash River, IN. Approp. Cost 10 Mason J. Niblack New Work Levee, IN. Approp. Cost 11 Mill Creek, OH. New Work Approp. Cost 12 Saline River & New Work Tributaries, IL. Approp. Cost 13 Southwestern New Work Jefferson County, Approp KY. Cost Flood Control - Reservoirs 14 Barren River New Work Lake, KY. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost (Contributed Funds)New Work Contrib. Cost 15 Brookville Lake, IN. (Contributed Funds) 16 Buckhorn Lake, KY. New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Total 1978 1979 1980 1981 Sep. 30, 1981 $- 720,500 748,872 2,336,975 3,087,188 1,951,000 387,178 3,079,900 1,313,916 300,00 21,258 -12,000 18,603 250,000 236,361 45,000 23,271 2,800,000 2,538,047 485,000 139,795 710,900 731,050 236,000 722,116 235,900 252,007 51,760 484,600 508,601 $- 880,600 778,726 2,181,100 2,446,462 2,415,000 3,329,507 600,000 2,134,535 -326,600 26,718 55,000 16,093 -987,000 . 36,450 38,000 36,741 2,418,000 3,267,914 627,000 126,230 884,000 888,778 40,367 37,655 -177,000 251,050 265,200 264,246 16,782 12,868 12,868 512,700 491,286 $- 1,127,000 1,212,991 2,592,000 2,194,532 4,885,000 3,972,216 1,925,000 1,384,776 -100 16,394 41,000 97,460 50,400 202,163 695,000 145,536 6,050,000 4,860,517 -173,712 603,710 655,000 635,202 68,051 70,763 -427,000 275,178 411,000 260,441 24,841 482,000 494,837 1,070,000 1,014,016 2,240,000 2,640,907 2,841,000 2,737,531 1,300,000 2,369,557 13,300 96,544 -4,000 13,032 2,103,000 1,842,086 -1,361 3,129 5,000,000 4,914,329 $13,808,2221 13,808,2221 19,910,8482 19,837,3342 4,176,749 4,176,749 42,038,0893 42,006,111' 556,956 556,956 12,440,2454 10,722,2154 20,068,856 5 19,712,4525 6,289,587 6,283,564 4,324,712 4,312,380 4,312,242 4,041,424 7,826,219 7,823,790 24,987,473 22,488,736 14,768 27,371,2996 188,838 27,371,2997 838,000 7,956,6268 9 853,504 7,914,9708 ' - 108,418" - 108,418"1 - 37,795,692 235,683 37,747,021 325,000 1,982,189 405,958 1,908,861 - 7,592,000 26,862 7,578,572 - 11,766,20612 - 11,766,20612 655,000 5,616,170'13 552,706 5,491,014 ' 4 24-19 REPORT OF CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 24-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT CONTINUED See Section Total in Text Fiscal Year 1978 1979 1980 1981 Sep. 30, 1981 Project Name Navigation - Lock and Dams 17 Caesar Creek New Work Lake, OH. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 18 Cagles Mill New Work Lake, IN. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 19 Camp Ground New Work Lake, KY. Approp. Cost 20 Carr Fork New Work Lake, KY. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 21 Cave Run New Work Lake, KY. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 22 Cecil M. Harden New Work Lake, IN. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 23 Clarence J. Brown New Work Dam & Reservoir, Approp. OH. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost. 24 Falmouth New Work Lake, KY. Approp. Cost 25 Green River New Work Lake, KY. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 26 Huntington New Work Lake, IN. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost (Contributed New Work Funds) Contrib. Cost 27 Lousiville New Work Lake, IL. Approp. Cost $5,150,000 4,203,844 192,100 188,975 209,500 195,099 35,000 31,307 718,957 687,598 483,900 490,007 2,981,606 1,432,148 235,500 234,119 101,750 1,043 263,300 261,729 109,684 260,600 258,410 170,000 93,416 500 275 713,200 705,835 127,600 4,491 274,500 290,466 169,000 782,534 $5,344,000 7,097,079 228,700 224,968 47,500 218,000 230,805 -15 7,563 81,600 383,054 534,300 538,066 2,006,000 2,978,279 252,600 252,320 700,000 689,561 -63,000 100,776 238,600 244,402 170,000 118,334 1,984 722,000 749,043 4 282,100 285,672 515,900 345,434 $3,613,800 2,910,844 245,000 242,822 -10,200 942 262,000 243,482 805,500 773,220 541,000 522,064 2,826,300 3,607,628 305,000 290,995 98,000 8,400 472,000 387,396 2,000 17,159 243,000 238,878 -15,000 -4,566 129,300 1,908 744,000 706,572 5,405 293,000 285,290 e- -2,368 103,678 $3,574,700 $60,752,282 2,893,288 58,274,349 302,000 1,180,463 291,592 1,160,405 -28,398 4,152,48415 7,960 4,152,48415 250,000 3,184,506 264,505 3,174,566 - 160,773 - 160,773 438,000 46,640,15716 649,378 46,599,560' 7 623,000 2,915,74618 602,565 2,865,84519 4,181,361 67,074,982 4,197,084 66,321,288 360,000 1,895,546 361,481 1,876,358 -1,632 6,658,80620 175,081 6,633,17721 337,000 3,819,396 436,607 3,813,320 22,083,700 174 22,083,700 292,000 1,786,347 287,019 1,774,103 -117,000 944,38622 816 944,38622 -68 33,422,41623 61,645 33,352,85724 796,000 6,728,46925 728,675 6,611,42826 -1,032 19,490,81327 101,784 19,425,87528 308,000 2,602,012 308,931 2,592,310 103 193,903 503 193,903 -90,000 2,335,81229 -4,450 2,315,77830 24-20 LOUISVILLE, KY., DISTRICT TABLE 24-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT CONTINUED See Section in Text Fiscal Year Project Name Navigation - Lock and Dams 28 Mississinewa New Work Lake, IN. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost. (Contributed New Work Funds) Contrib. Cost 29 Monroe Lake, IN. New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost (Contributed New Work Funds) Contrib. Cost 30 Nolin Lake, KY. New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 31 Ohio River'Basin New Work Louisville District Approp. Cost 32 Patoka Lake, IN. New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost (Contributed New Work Funds) Contrib. Cost 33 Rough River Lake New Work and Channel Approp. Improvement, KY. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost (Contributed New Work Funds) Contrib. Cost 34 Salamonie New Work Lake, IN. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost (Contributed New Work Funds) Contrib. Cost 35 Taylorsville New Work Lake, KY. Approp. Cost (Contributed New Work Funds) Contrib. Cost 37 West Fork of Mill New Work Creek Lake, OH. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 38 William H. New Work Harsha Lake, OH. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Total 1978 1979 1980 1981 Sep. 30, 1981 $74,250 16,195 240,000 257,567 145,270 206,200 231,036 603,000 1,010,865 1,167,800 1,097,196 1,221 11,700,000 10,679,283 130,700 130,681 2,973,900 2,958,963 23,000 14,509 737,100 796,448 22,873 21,395 45,837 223,500 238,695 5,054,000 4,405,915 .- 150,000 114,167 141,000 141,648 3,900,000 4,973,060 197,400 197,581 $-5,500 3,728 261,000 257,310 -310,000 10,055 253,000 254,081 47,000 479,876 774,000 858,924 3,500,000 4,949,603 189,200 184,439 1,970,800 2,256,776 80,132 17,177 838,000 828,213 $-40,000 20,471 288,000 283,060 -3 27,000 39,822 280,000 269,094 -72,500 47,500 728,000 707,743 1,300,000 3,939,944 245,000 237,736 765,500 2,020,856 -39,888 33,201 877,000 857,706 198 1,279 91,956 264,300 264,360 7,200,000 7,983,660 43,000 92,587 171,200 168,836 2,775,000 2,862,249 222,600 210,722 74,908 262,000 262,015 7,905,998 7,427,796 37,139 175,000 162,642 3,738,000 2,223,600 275,000 266,338 $-3,982 $23,981,43831 310,560 23,974,99532 282,000 2,696,105 274,215 2,670,342 - 239,200 -190 237,884 - 7,710,05033 306,023 7,668,48434 320,000 3,075,365 303,880 3,043,358 - 8,015,323 ,8,015,323 - 17,201,17735 26,604 17,196,47236 928,000 9,506,49537 38 876,364 9,393,44038 39 - 1,526,142 - 1,526,142 2,800,000 52,605,920 2,073,045 51,221,400 227,000 818,131 231,368 810,274 833,400 19,903,500 445,820 19,228,717 2,570 10,620,39740 19,228 10,618,88241 1,017,000 9,618,57042 966,177 9,518,69843 - 22,87311 - 22,87311 -26 16,559,21744 61,925 16,559,02845 258,000 2,860,313 260,106 2,855,182 -103 170,697 -268 163,916 17,390,000 54,829,998 13,684,349 49,743,062 518,000 518,000 168,013 168,013 -5,039 3,758,90246 47 214,077 3,671,43846 48 230,000 2,255,889 233,748 2,243,194 1,511,000 50,670,17149 2,861,045 49,933,95349 336,000 1,089,366 342,312 1,073,167 24-21 REPORT OF CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 24-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT CONTINUED 1. Includes $85,000 public works funds. 2. Includes $2,000 emergency relief funds, $19,000 "Maintenance and Operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters" funds, and $3,842,667 expended from 1888 to June 30, 1936, for operating and care of works of improvement under provisions of permanent indefinite appropriation for such purpose. 3. Includes $203,127 allotted in prior years from appropriation "Maintenance and Operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters," and $6,405,372 expended between July 5, 1885 and June 30, 1937 on operation and care of works of improvement under provisions of permanent indefinite appropriation for such purposes. 4. Includes $12,426 allotted to Bellevue-Dayton and used in study of that project. 5. Includes $11,812 emergency relief funds. 6. Includes $2,054,948 Code 711 funds and $280,107 Code 713 funds. 7. Includes $2,224,948 Code 711 funds and $110,107 Code 713 funds. 8. Includes $100,000 Supplemental funds. 9. Includes $195,100 Special Recreation Use Fees. 10. Includes $186,688 Special Recreation Use Fees. 11. Cost sharing for Code 713 recreation facilities. 12. Includes $61,451 public work acceleration executive 1963 funds, $143,088 Code 711 funds, and $243,619 code 712 funds. 13. Includes $44,400 Special Recreation Use Fees. 14. Includes $30,689 Special Recreation Use Fees. 15. Includes $35,814 Code 711 funds and $8,902 Code 713 funds. 16. Includes $80,000 Code 711 funds. 17. Includes $61,310 Code 711 funds. 18. Includes $19,700 Special Recreation Use Fees. 19. Includes $19,543 Special Recreation Use Fees. 20. Includes $19,683 Code 711 funds and $378,989 Code 713 funds. 21. Includes $19,683 Code 711 funds and $353,359 Code 713 funds. 22. Includes $263,821 for preconstruction planning engineering and design completed before FY 1953. 23. Includes $133,500 Code 711 funds and $183,732 Code 713 funds. 24. Includes $63,941 Code 711 funds and $183,732 Code 713 funds. 25. Includes$79,500 SpecialRecreation Use Fees. 26. Includes $79,305 Special Recreation Use Fees. 27. Includes $208,947 Code 713 funds. 28. Includes $149,316 Code 713 funds. 29. Includes $685,632 advance funding for Government participation in the construction of U.S. Route 45 relocation by the State of Illinois. 30. Includes $685,629 for Government participation in the construction of U.S. Route 45 relocation by the State of Illinois. 31. Includes $394,305 Code 713 funds. 32. Includes $394,305 Code 713 funds. 33. Includes $1,185 Code 711 funds and $894,100 Code 713 funds. 34. Includes $1,185 Code 711 funds and $852,534 Code 713 funds. 35. Includes $21,897 public works acceleration executive 1963 funds, and $2,604,113 Code 711 funds. 36. Includes $21,897 public works acceleration executive 1963 funds, and $2,599,408 Code 711 funds. 37. Includes $119,500 Special Recreation Use Fees. 38. Includes $52,000 Supplemental Funds. 39. Includes $94,285 Special Recreation Use Fees. 40. Includes $196,306 public works acceleration executive 1963 funds, $867,404 Code 711 funds, and $22,612 code 713 funds. 41. Includes $196,306 public works acceleration executive 1963 funds, $865,888 Code 711 funds, and $22,612 Code 713 funds. 42. Includes $123,400 Special Recreation Use Fees. 43. Includes $107,936 Special Recreation Use Fees. 44. Includes $314,906 Code 713 funds. 45. Includes $314,717 Code 713 funds. 46. Includes $50,000 contributed funds expended for new work. 47. Includes $615,961 Code 713 funds. 48. Includes $528,497 Code 713 funds. 49. Includes $58,571 for preconstruction planning engineering and design completed before FY 1953. 24-22 LOUISVILLE, KY., DISTRICT TABLE 24-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents GREEN AND BARREN RIVERS. KY. (See Section 2 of Text) Purchase of original improvement Construction of Lock 2, Green River Construction of Lock 5, Green River Construction of Lock 6, Green River Appropriated $5,000 for continuing improvements of Green River above mouth of Big Barren River, with provision "That the Secretary of War may, in his discretion, expend such portion of said amount as may be necessary for removal of snags in Nolin River." Construct new Lock 1 and new Lock and Dam 2, Green River July 3, 19302 Construct new locks at Dam 5, Green River and Dam 1, Barren River; modification of Dam 5, Green River, widen bends in Bear Creek, KY. June 26, 19343 Aug. 30, 19352 Sept. 3, 1954 Operation and care of locks and dams with War Department Appropriations for rivers and harbors. Improvement of Nolin River Channel enlargement of lower 103 miles of Green River. Revocation of authorities for improvement of Bear Creek and Nolin River. H. Ex Sess. p. 19( Annur Annu S. Doc sion. River tee, I Sessi Cong H. D. Sessi S.D. 8 OHIO RIVER BASIN (Louisville Dist.) (See Section 42 of Text) Aug. 28, 1937 Construct levee, floodwalls, and drainage structures for protection of Flood cities and towns in Ohio River Basin, projects to be selected by umel Chief of Engineers with approval of Secretary of War, at a cost not sion. to exceed $24,877,000 for construction June 28, 1938 Approved general comprehensive plan for flood control and other Flood purposes in Ohio River Basin as may be advisable in discretion of umer Secretary of War and Chief of Engineers, and for initiation and Sessi partial accomplishment of plan, authorized $75 million for reservoirs and $50.3 mi lion for local protection works, individual projects to be selected and approved by Chief of Engineers subject to provision that authorization shall include diversion of Cache River above Cairo, Illinois, and protection of area north of Cairo drainage district by levees at an estimated cost of $2 million. Aug. 18, 1941 Additional $45 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Dec. 22, 1944 Additional $70 million for further prosecution of comprehensive H. Do plan for Ohio River Basin, including plan of improvement for flood Sessi control and other purposes in Kentucky River Basin Flood protection works at Taylorsville, Kentucky, at an estimated S. D. : cost of $129,350 sion Channel improvement of lower Rough River and Barnett Creek at H.D. an estimated cost of $360,000 sion July 24, 1946 Additional $125 million for further prosecution of comprehensive H.D. plan, including plan of improvement for flood control in Wabash sion River Basin, Illinois and Indiana, at an estimated cost of $9,629,000 Also, West Fork of Mill creek at an estimated cost of $1,527,000 H.D. May 17, 1950 July 3, 1958 Additional $100 million for prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin, including necessary bank stabilization measures at New Harmony Bridge, Indiana, at an estimated cost of $500,000 Flood Control Act of 1958 modified comprehensive plan to provide for Monroe Reservoir on Salt Creek, White River Basin, Indiana, at an estimated cost to the United States of $4,350,000; cost to local interests, $5,141,000 sion H.D. sion Aug. 11, 1888 Mar. 3, 18931 July 13, 1892 July 13, 1902 Mar. 3, 19052 Mar. 3, 1909 24-23 .Doc. 111, 49th Cong., 2d , Annual Report 1887, 03. al Report, 1891, P. 2439 al Report 1891, p. 2478 c. 82, 83d Cong., 2nd Sess and Harbors Commit- Doc 2, 71st Cong., 1st ion, and H. Doc. 685, 69th gress, 2nd Session 480, 72nd Cong., 2nd ion. 2, 83d Cong., 2nd Session Control Committee Docnt 1, 75th Cong., 1st Ses- Control Committee Docnt 1, 75th Cong., 1st ion. c. 504, 78th Cong., 2nd ion 105, 78th Cong., 1st Ses- 535, 78th Cong., 2nd Ses- 197, 80th Cong., 1st Ses- 198, 80th Cong., 1st Ses- 192, 85th Cong., 1st Ses TABLE 24-B CONTINUED REPORT OF CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents OHIO RIVER BASIN (Louisville Dist.) (Cont'd.) Oct. 23, 1962 Flood Control Act of 1962 deleted Jessamine Creek Reservoir on H.D. 432, 87th Cong., 2nd Ses- Kentucky River, Kentucky, from comprehensive plan for Ohio sion River Basin Dec. 30, 1963 Additional $150 million for further prosecution of comprehensive Public Law 88-253, 88th Cong., plan for Ohio River Basin 1st Session June 18, 1965 Additional $89 million for further prosecution of comprehensive Public Law 89-42, 89th Cong., plan for Ohio River Basin 1st Session May 12, 1967 Additional $38 million for further prosecution of comprehensive Public Law 90-17, 90th Cong., plan for Ohio River Basin 1 Session Aug. 13, 1968 Additonal $35 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan Public law 90-483, 90th Cong., for Ohio River Basin 2nd Session June 19, 1970 Additional $69 million for further prosecution of comprehensive Public Law 91-282, 91st Cong., plan for Ohio River Basin 2nd Session Mar. 7, 1974 Additional $120 million for further prosecution of comprehensive Public Law 93-251, 93rd Cong., plan for Ohio River Basin 2nd Session Mar. 7, 1974 54 local protection projects and 1 reservoir project in comprehensive Public law 93-251, 93rd Cong., plan for Ohio River Basin were deauthorized August 5, 1977, under 2nd Session Section 12, Water Resources Development Act of 1974 Two additional local protection projects in comprehensive plan of Ohio River Basin were deauthorized November 6, 1977, under Section 12 Water Resources Development Act of 1974 WABASH RIVER BASIN (See Section 46 of Text) Aug. 13, 1968 Construction of five multiple purpose reservoirs and one local pro- S.D. 96, 90th Cong., 2nd Sestection project in Wabash River Basin, Ill. & Ind., with proviso that sion construction of Big Walnut Lake, Ind. project must be approved by the President. Authorization of $50 million for initiation and partial accomplishment of project. 1 Deficiency act. 2 Authorization for Nolin River and Bear Creek revoked by Act of Sept. 3, 1954. 3 Permanent Appropriation Repeal Act. 24-24 LOUISVILLE, KY., DISTRICT TABLE 24-C GREEN AND BARREN RIVERS, KY.: PRINCIPAL DATA CONCERNING LOCKS AND DAMS (See Section 2 of Text) Depth Depth Greatest Elevation on on Length of Lower Upper of Normal Miter Miter Miles Width Lock Pool Sill at Sill at from of Available Lift at Above Normal Normal Lock Mouth Lock for Full Normal Mean Pool Pool and of Chamber Width Pool Sea Level Level Level Dam Location of Nearest Town River (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) GREEN RIVER New 1 Spottsville, KY. 9.1 84.0 600.0 11.8' 349.1 11.3 12.1 New 2 0.3 miles below Calhoun, KY. 63.1 84.0 600.0 14.3 363.4 11.7 15.0 3 0.3 miles below Rochester, KY. 108.5 35.8 137.5 17.0 380.4 5.6 7.3 4 Woodbury, KY. 149.02 35.8 138.0 16.4 396.8 6.5 7.1 5 0.3 miles below Glenmore, KY. 168.13 56.0 360.0 15.2 412.0 9.3 12.0 6 2.8 miles above Brownsville, KY. 181.73 36.0 145.0 9.2 421.1 8.8 8.0 BARREN RIVER 1 0.3 mi. above Greencastle, KY. 15.04 56.0 360.0 15.2 412.0 9.3 12.0 Lock and Dam Character of Foundation GREEN RIVER New 1 Shale and coal New 2 Shale 3 Rock 4 Rock 5 Piles and rock 6 Gravel BARREN RIVER 1 Gravel Piles in gravel Type of Dam Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed' Fixed'o Fixed Fixexd-e Type of Construction Concrete masonry5 Concrete masonry Wood crib Wood crib Concrete masonry Wooc crib, concrete cap Wood crib, concrete cap Year Cost of Lock Completed and Dam 19566 19568 1833-36 1839 1934 1905 1841 1934 $5,101,9787 4,799,271s 121,377 125,718 1,020,86811 168,415 871,565 ' 2 1. At normal pool Dam 48, Ohio River, Elev. 337.3 Green River datum (Elev. 388.0 Ohio River datum). 2. Breaching of dam on May 24,1965, stopped thru traffic to Bowling Green, KY. 3. Operation discontinued Aug. 1, 1951. 4. Distance from mouth of Green River is 164.5 miles. Lock closed to navigation as the result of loss of pool at Green River Lock and Dam 4 on May 24, 1965. 5. New cellular concrete masonry dam constructed 1970- 71 with O&M General funds at cost of $822,000. 6. New Lock 1 placed in operation May 25,1956; old Dam 1, completed 1835-40, replaced with new dam in 1971. 7. Does not include $179,110 cost of old Lock and Dam 1. 8. New Lock and Dam 2, placed in operation June 18, 1956. 9. Does not include $295,696 cost of old Lock and Dam 2. 10. With movable A-frame crest 3 feet high. 11. Does not include $179,434 cost of old Lock and Dam 5. 12. Includes $729,269 for new large lock completed in 1934. 24-25 TABLE 24-D Green Green Green Green Green Green Green REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 GREEN AND BARREN RIVERS, KY.: TERMINAL FACILITIES (See Section 2 of Text) Nearest Town South Carrollton, KY. South Carrollton, KY. South Carrollton, KY. Rockport, KY. Paradise, KY. Rochester, KY. Rochester, KY. 81.5 85.25 85.9 97.7 99.5 105.7 108.1 Receiving coal Loading coal Loading coal Loading coal Loading coal Loading coal Loading coal 24-26 River Mile Purpose TABLE 24-E KENTUCKY RIVER, KY.: LOCKS AND DAMS (See Section 3 of Text) Lock Greatest Elevation Available of Normal Miles Length Pool Above Depth on from Clear (Full Width Lift of Mean Lower Dam Nearest Town Mouth Width of Lock) Lock Sea Level Miter Sill Foundation Completed Cost (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) 1 3.8 miles above Carrollton, KY. 4.0 38 145 8.22 430.0 4.8 Rock and clay 1839 $ - 2' Lockport, KY. 31.0 38 145 13.9 443.9 6.1 Rock 1839 - 31 Gest, KY. 42.0 38 145 13.2 457.1 6.5 Rock 1844 1,350,3854 41 1 mile below Frankfort, KY. 65.0 38 145 13.2 470.3 6.3 Rock 1844 - 55 2.8 miles below Tyrone, KY. 82.2 38 145 15.0 485.3 6.4 Rock 1844 - 6' 21.6 miles below High Bridge, KY. 96.2 52 147 14.0 499.3 6.4 Rock and piles 1894 314,847 71 0.8 mile below High Bridge, KY. 117.0 52 147 15.3 514.6 6.8 Rock 1897 290,788 8' 4.7 miles above Camp Nelson, KY. 139.9 52 146 18.7 533.6 6.0 Rock 1900 275,463 96 Valley View, KY. 157.5 52 148 17.3 550.6 6.6 Rock 1907 237,646 106 1 mile below Ford, KY. 176.4 52 148 17.0 567.6 6.0 Rock 1907 221,500 116 17.2 miles below Irvine, KY. 201.0 52 148 18.0 585.6 6.0 Rock 1906 296,593 127 Ravenna, KY. 220.0 52 148 17.0 602.6 6.0 Rock 1910 425,693 137 2.2 miles below Willow, KY. 239.9 52 148 18.0 620.6 6.0 Rock 1915 461,476 146 Heidelberg, KY. 249.0 52 148 17.0 637.6 6.0 Rock 1917 392,902 1. Fixed dam, crib construction, sheet pile cutoff, concrete cap. 2. At normal pool McAlpine Dam, Ohio River elev. 421.8 Kentucky River datum (Elev. 420 Ohio River datum). 3. Reconstruction completed by United States in 1882. 4. Built by State of Kentucky. Cost given is for repairs by United States to Locks and Dams 1 through 5. Original construction costs to State were: L&D 1, $220,300; L&D 2, $151,983; L&D 3, $135,857; L&D 4, $131,607; L&D 5, $137,436. 5. Fixed dam, crib construction, concrete cap. 6. Fixed dam, concrete construction. 7. Fixed dam, concrete construction, wooden crest. REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 24-F OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Full Report Cost to Sep. 30 1981 See Annual Operation and Name of Project Report for- Construction Maintenance Licking River, KY. 1901 $ 13,045 $ - Rough River, KY. 1 2 1952 105,500 101,196 Tradewater River, KY.2 3 1958 18,568 33,331 White River, IN.2 3 1909 119,312 1. Disposal of Federally-owned property authorized by Secretary of Army Sep. 1,1959, pursuant to authorization in Public Law 996, 84th Cong., (70 Stat. 1062). 2. Completed. 3. No commerce reported. 24-28 LOUISVILLE, KY., DISTRICT TABLE 24-G OHIO RIVER BASIN (LOUISVILLE DISTRICT) LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS (See Section 31 of Text) Type of Estimated Cost2 Project' Construction Federal Non-Federal Total Completed: Barnett Creek, KY. (Rough River Basin)3 4 Channel improvement Brookport, IL. 56 Wall and levee Cannelton, IN. 5 7 Wall and levee Cincinnati, OH.5 8 Wall and barrier dam Covington, KY.5 9 Wall and levee Delphi, IN. (Wabash River)5 10 Levee England Pond Levee, IL. (Wabash River)1' Levee Golconda, IL.5 12 Wall and levee Harrisburg, IL. 5 10 Wall and levee Hawesville, KY. 5 13 Levee Jackson, KY. (Kentucky River Basin)5 8 Cutoff channel Jeffersonville-Clarksville, IN.7 Wall and levee Lawrenceburg, IN.5 Wall and levee Louisville, KY.5 14 Wall and levee New Albany, IN.5 8 Wall and levee Newport, KY. 7' Wall and levee Paducah KY.5 7 Wall and levee Reevesville, IL. (Cache River)5 15 Levee Rochester and McCleary's Bluff Levee, II. (Wabash River) 11 Levee Rough River, KY.3 4 Channel improvement Sturgis, KY. (Tradewater River)1 Levee Taylorsville, KY. (Salt River)5 16 Levee Tell City, IN.s 14 Wall and levee Uniontown, KY.s 17 Levee Vincennes, IN. (Wabash River)s Wall and levee West Terre Haute, IN. (Wabash River) Levee Active: Dayton, KY.4 ' Wall and levee Evansville, IN.4 Wall and levee Mason J. Niblack Levee, IN. (Wabash River)4 SLevee and pump plants Russell & Allison Levee, IL. (Wabash River)s Levee Inactive: Adams Levee, IN. (Wabash River) Levee Bonpas Creek, IL. (Wabash River Basin)s Channel Improvement Caseyville, KY.s Levee Cloverport, KY.s Wall and levee Concordia, KY.s Levee Frankfort, KY. (Kentucky River)s South Frankfort Areas Wall and levee Benson Creek Areas Wall and levee North Frankfort Areas Wall and levee Greenfield Bayou Levee, IN. (Wabash River)' Levee Island Levee, IN. (Wabash River)5 Levee Lewisport, KY.' Wall and levee Metropolis, IL.s Wall and levee New Harmony Bridge, IL. and IN. (Wabash River)5 Bank protection Owensboro, KY.' Wall and levee Shawneetown, IL.' Wall and levee Smithland, KY.' Wall and levee Tolu, KY.5 Levee Utica, IN.5 Levee West Point, KY.s Wall and levee Wilders, KY. Wall and levee Deauthorized August 5, 1977 under Section 12, Water Resources Development Act of 1974 (Public Law 93-251): Alton, IN. Levee Bellevue, KY.5 Wall and levee Bromley, KY.' Wall and levee Carrollton, KY.' Wall and levee Cave-in-Rock, IL.' Levee Cincinnati, OH. (Unit 2)5 Wall and levee Cincinnati, OH. (Unit 4)5 Wall Cleves, OH.' Levee $ - 597,493 2,068,391 10,150,935 7,866,300 144,563 734,498 565,333 870,015 969,318 130,952 4,226,361 2,433,414 2,540,000 5,375,471 7,512,987 4,761,532 600,300 1,079,236 1,826,778 373,050 932,229 1,070,926 6,426,000 1,095,704 12,820,000 56,000,000 4,344,000 5,340,000 292,000 1,080,000 396,000 728,000 590,000 13,200,000 3,340,000 2,961,000 4,600,000 4,360,000 610,000 3,070,000 962,000 886,000 1,810,000 864,000 303,000 1,570,000 3,283,000 10,800,000 255,000 1,570,000 1,250,000 2,220,000 661,000 16,800,000 14,900,000 1,240,000 'p - 8,500 29,105 1,309,146 1,051,102 17,164 107,000 10,900 20,000 42,593 3,000 590,888 284,725 745,000 740,000 298,506 232,000 40,000 100,000 93,000 63,309 32,707 72,153 285,000 150,000 2,043,000 7,982,000 109,200 2,025,000 14,000 630,000 35,000 193,000 55,000 1,390,000 1,150,000 272,100 1,087,000 528,000 243,000 431,000 99,000 195,000 361,000 414,000 35,000 120,000 400,000 959,000 40,000 400,000 925,000 97,000 125,000 2,900,000 621,000 67,000 24-29 $ 605,993 2,097,496 11,460,081 8,917,402 161,727 841,498 576,233 890,015 1,011,911 133,952 4,817,249 2,718,139 3,285,000 6,115,471 7,811,493 4,993,532 640,300 1,179,236 1,919,778 436,359 964,936 1,143,079 6,711,000 1,245,704 14,863,000"1 63,982,0001' 4,453,2001' 7,365,000 306,00021 1,710,00021 431,000 921,000 645,000 14,590,00021 4,490,0001 3,233,1002 5,687,0002] 5,158,0002 853,0002 3,501,000 1,061,0002 1.081,000 2,171,000 1,278,000 338,000 1,690,000 3,683,00024 11,759,00024 295,000 1,970,000 2,175,000 2,317,000 786,000 19,700,000 15,521,000 1,307,000 LOUISVILLE, KY., DISTRICT Clinton, IN. (Wabash River)5 Levee Deer Creek Prairie Levee, IN. (Wabash River)5 Levee Derby, IN.5 Wall and levee Elizabethtown, IL.5 Wall and levee Fletcher and Sunshine Gardens Levee, IN. (Wabash River Basin)5 Levee Grandview, IN.5 Levee Honey Creek Levee, IN. (Wabash River)5 Levee Leavenworth, IN.5 Wall and levee Levee Unit 1, Eel River, IN. (Wabash River Basin)5 Levee Levee Unit 2, Eel River, IN. (Wabash River Basin)5 Levee Levee Unit 1, Little Wabash River, IL. (Wabash River Basin) Levee Levee Unit 2, Little Wabash River, IL. (Wabash River Basin) Levee Levee Unit 6, Wabash River, IL. (Wabash River Basin) Levee Levee Unit 17, IN. (Wabash River Basin) Levee Levee Unit 1, White River, IN. (Wabash River Basin) Levee Levee Unit 2, White River, IN. (Wabash River Basin) Levee Levee Unit 7, White River, IN. (Wabash River Basin) Levee Ludlow, KY.5 Wall and levee Madison, IN.5 Wall and levee Mauckport, IN.5 Levee McGinnis Levee, IN.(Wabash River Basin)5 Levee Milton, KY.5 Wall Moscow, OH.5 Levee New Amsterdam, IN.S Levee New Harmony IN. (Wabash River)5 Levee New Richmond, OH.S Wall and levee Patriot, IN.5 Levee Prestonville, KY.5 Wall and levee Raccoon Levee, IN. (Wasbash River)5 Levee Rising Sun, IN.5 Wall and levee Rockport, IN.5 Wall and levee Rome N.5 Levee Shuffiebarger Levee, IN. (Wabash River Basin)5 Levee Sugar Creek Levee, IN. (Wabash River) Levee Tri-Pond Levee, IL. (Wabash River) Levee Troy, IN.5 Wall and levee Vevay, IN.5 Levee Westport, KY. 5 Wall Deauthorized November 6, 1977 under Section 12, Water Resources Development Act of 1974 (Public Law 93-251) Aurora, IN.5 Wall and levee California (Cincinnati, OH.) 5 Wall and levee 77,000 213,000 553,000 559,000 548,000 580,000 653,000 1,470,000 204,000 2,090,000 2,850,000 3,410,000 1,160,000 1,580,000 2,180,000 724,000 1,490,000 2,540,000 3,820,000 506,000 1,820,000 2,480,000 1,170,000 476,000 616,000 3,200,000 753,000 1,710,000 426,000 896,000 466,000 359,000 2,380,000 418,000 2,050,000 502,000 1,170,000 1,610,000 4,300,000 1,750,000 9,000 10,000 67,000 153,000 26,000 133,000 32,000 266,000 40,000 715,000 164,000 136,000 56,000 118,000 116,000 73,000 88,000 745,000 360,000 105,000 104,000 41,000 372,000 13,000 25,000 720,000 372,000 55,000 37,000 280,000 133,000 67,000 90,000 29,000 191,000 133,000 146,000 41,000 OHIO RIVER BASIN (LOUISVILLE DISTRICT) LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS (See Section 31 of Text) Type of Estimated Cost2 Construction Federal Non-Federal T 86,000 223,00024 620,000 712,000 574,00024 713,000 685,000 1,736,000 244,000 2,805,000 3,014,00027 3,546,00022 1,216,000 1,698,00022 2,296,00027 797,00027 1,578,00027 3,285,000 4,180,000 611,000 1,924,000 2,521,000 1,542,000 489,000 641,000 3,920,000 1,125,000 1,765,000 463,00024 1,176,000 599,000 426,000 2,470,000 447,00024 2,241,00020 635,000 1,316,000 1,651,000 1,190,000 5,490,000 720,000 2,470,000 1. All projects are on Ohio River unless otherwise noted. 2. Latest cost estimate revision 1954 unless otherwise noted. 3. Part of Rough River Reservoir and Channel Improvement Project, KY. 4. Details of this project are in individual report. 5. Also see "Other authorized flood control projects." 6. See Annual Report for 1958 for details. 7. See Annual Report for 1959 for details. 8. See Annual Report for 1957 for details. 9. See Annual Report for 1965 for details. 10. See Annual Report for 1953 for details. 11. See Annual Report for 1972 for details. 12. See Annual Report for 1960 for details. 13. See Annual Report for 1955 for details. 14. See Annual Report for 1962 for details. 15. Substitute project for Belknap, Karnak, and Ullin, IL., complete. See Annual Report for 1954 for details. 16. See Annual Report for 1952 for details. 17. See Annual Report for 1956 for details. 18. Latest cost estimate revision 1981. 19. Latest cost estimate revision 1976. 20. Latest cost estimate revision 1973. 21. Active. 22. Complete. 23. Latest cost estimate revision 1978. 24. Latest cost estimate revision 1960. 25. Latest cost estimate revision 1971. 26. Latest cost estimate revision 1977. "27. Latest cost estimate revision 1961. 24-30 TABLE 24-G CONTINUED Project1 otal LOUISVILLE, KY., DISTRICT TABLE 24-G CONTINUED OHIO RIVER BASIN (LOUISVILLE DISTRICT) LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS (See Section 40 of Text) Type of Estimated Cost2 Project' Construction Federal Non-Federal Total Inactive: Marion, IN.' Wall and levee 3,900,000 854,000 4,754,0002 1. Also see "Other Authorized flood control projects." 2. Latest cost estimate revision 1977 24-31 TABLE 24-H REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 OHIO RIVER BASIN (LOUISVILLE DISTRICT): RESERVOIRS (See Section 31 of Text) Estimated Cost1 Tributary Basin & Reservoirs Stream Federal Non-Federal Total Great Miami River: Brookville Lake, IN.2 East Fork of Whitewater River $48,455,000 $18,147,0003 $ 66,602,000 Metamora Lake, IN.4 West Fork of White River 35,300,000 - 35,300,0005 Green River: Barren River Lake, KY.2 Barren River 27,371,299 108,4186 27,479,717 Green River Lake, KY.2 Green River 33,422,416 186,7476 33,609,163 Mining City Lake, KY.7 Green River 69,100,000 - 69,100,0005 Nolin Lake, KY.2 Nolin River 17,922,176 - 17,922,176 Rough River Lake, KY.2 Rough River 11,242,397 22,6126 11,265,009 Kentucky River: Booneville Lake, KY.2 7 South Fork of Kentucky River 60,700,000 - 60,700,0008 Buckhorn Lake, KY.2 Middle Fork of Kentucky River 11,766,206 - 11,766,206 Carr Fork Lake, KY.2 North Fork of Kentucky River 49,340,100 - 49,340,1009 Licking River Cave Run Lake, KY.2 Licking River 110,084,000 - 110,084,00010 Falmouth Lake, KY.2 7 Licking River 131,000,000 - 131,000,000" Little Miami River: Caesar Creek Lake, OH.2 Caesar Creek 67,288,500 12,607,50012 79,896,000 William H. Harsha Lake, OH.2 East Fork of Little Miami River 61,281,000 13,918,00013 75,199,000 Mill Creek: West Fork of Mill Creek Lake, OH.2 West Fork of Mill Creek 4,294,902 1,772,76114 6,067,663 Wabash River: Cagles Mill Lake, IN.2 Mill Creek 4,373,582 230,0006 4,603,582 Cecil M. Harden Lake, IN.2 Raccoon Creek 6,658,806 378,9886 7,037,794 Monroe Lake, IN.2 Salt Creek 7,710,050 8,909,42315 16,619,473 Patoka Lake, IN.2 Patoka River 54,377,000 25,985,00016 80,362,000 1. Latest cost estimate 1981 unless otherwise noted. 2. Details of this project given in individual report. 3. $7,592,000 cash contribution for water supply storage and $10,555,000 for Code 713 recreation development; method of payment not determined. 4. Inactive; deauthorized August 5, 1977 under Section 12, Water Resources Development Act of 1974 (Public Law 93-251). 5. Latest cost estimate revision 1954. 6. For Code 713 recreation development. 7. Inactive. 8. Latest cost estimate revision 1975. 9. Latest cost estimate revision 1980. 10. Includes $31,769,000 United States Forest Service cost. 11. Latest cost estimate revision 1979. 12. Includes $4,991,000 reimbursement for water supply storage and $7,616,500 for Code 713 recreation development. 13. Includes $3,496,000 reimbursement for water supply storage and $10,422,000 for Code 713 recreation development. " 14. Includes $520,800 for non-Federal cost for sewer relocation and dam, $50,000 for contributed funds in fulfillment of project authorization, and $1,201,961 for Code 713 recreation development. 15. Includes $8,015,323 cash contribution for storage for low-flow regulation and $894,100 for Code 713 recreation development. 16. Includes $13,350,000 cash contribution for water supply storage, $11,231,000 for initial recreation development, and $1,404,000 for Code 713 recreation development. 24-32 LOUISVILLE, KY., DISTRICT TABLE 24-I WABASH RIVER BASIN (LOUISVILLE DISTRICT): RESERVOIRS (See Section 36 of Text) Estimated Cost' Tributary Basin & Reservoirs Stream Federal Non-Federal Total Wabash River: Big Blue Lake, IN.2 Big Blue River $87,200,000 $53,846,0003 $141,046,000 Big Walnut Lake, IN.2 Big Walnut Creek 81,800,000 45,069,0004 126,869,000 Downeyville Lake, IN. Flatrock and Little Flat 71,468,000 63,112,0005 134,580,000 Rock Rivers Helm Lake, IL. 7 Skillet Fork 32,009,000 21,667,0008 53,676,000 Louisville Lake, IL.9 Little Wabash River 93,090,000 15,604,0001� 108, 694,000 1. Latest cost revision 1981 unless otherwise noted. 2. Inactive; latest cost estimate revision 1979. 3. Includes $38,190,000 reimbursable by non-Federal interests for water supply and $15,656,000 reimbursable for recreation facilities. 4. Includes $26,663,000 reimbursable by non-Federal interests for water supply and $18,406,000 reimbursable for recreation facilities. 5. Includes $47,648,000 reimbursable by non-Federal interests for water supply, $7,896,000 reimbursable for initial recreation facilities and $7,568,000 for future recreation development. 6. Inactive; see Annual Report for 1976 for individual report. 7. Latest cost estimate revision 1975. 8. Includes $12,696,000 reimbursable by non-Federal interests for water supply and $8,971,000 reimbursable for recreation facilities. 9. Details of this project given in individual report. 10. Includes $7,750,000 reimbursable by non-Federal interests for water supply and $7,854,000 reimbursable for recreation facilities. 24-33 TABLE 24-J REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARY 1981 INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 39 of Text) Fall Spring Fall Local Protection Projects Inspection 1980 Inspection 1981 Inspection 1981 Brevoort Levee, IL. Sep Brookport, IL. Nov Cannelton, IN. Nov Cincinnati, OH. Sep Covington, KY. Sep Delphi, IN. Aug England Pond Levee, IL. Sep Evansville, IN. Oct Frankfort, KY. Sep Gill Township Levee, IN. Aug Golconda, IL Oct Harrisburg, IL. Oct Hawesville, KY. Nov Indianapolis, IN. Aug Jeffersonville-Clarksville, IN. Nov Lawrenceburg, IN. Sep Lebanon Junction, KY. Dec Levee Unit No. 5, IN. Oct Levee Unit No. 8, IN. Aug Louisville, KY. Sep Lyford Levee, IN. Sep Mt. Carmel, IL. Oct Muncie, IN. Aug New Albany, IN. Nov Newport, KY. Sep Niblack Levee, IN. Sep Paducah, KY. Nov Reevesville-Cache River, IL. Nov Rochester-McCleary's Bluff Levee, IL. Oct Rosiclare, IL. Oct Shawneetown, IL. Oct Sturgis, KY. Oct Taylorsville, KY. Dec Tell City, IN. Nov Terre Haute (Conover Levee), IN. Sep Uniontown, KY. Oct Vincennes, IN. Oct West Terre Haute, IN. Sep Channel Improvements Cypress Creek, McLean County, KY. Eel River, Brazil Waterworks, IN. English, IN. (Little Blue River) Grassy Creek, Jackson County, IN. Harrodsburg, KY. (Town Branch) Indian Creek, Corydon, IN. Jackson, KY. (North Fork Kentucky River) Mill Creek, KY. Morehead, KY. (Triplett Creek) Muscatatuck River, Crothersville, IN. Neon-Fleming, KY. Nicholasville, (Town Fork) Vicinity, KY. Panther Creek, Curdsville, KY. Plum Creek, Spencer County, KY. Portland, IN. (Salamonie River) Saline River and Tributaries, IL. Troublesome Creek, Hindman, KY. Whitesburg, KY. (North Fork Kentucky River) Bank Revetments Boone County, KY. (Ohio River) Cloverport, KY. (Ohio River) Eighteen Mile Island, Oldham Co., KY. Evansville, IN. (Ohio River) Hawesville, KY. (Ohio River) Indian Hills, OH. (Little Miami River) Kentucky Peninsula, KY. (Ohio River) Madison, IN. (Ohio River) Merom, IN. (Wabash River) Newburgh, IN. (Ohio River) Patoka River at Jasper, IN. Rockport, IN. (Ohio River). South Bank White River, Petersburg, Pike County, IN. Troy, IN. (Ohio River) Upper River Rd., Jefferson Co., KY. Jun Jun May Apr Apr Jun May Apr Jun Jun May Jul Apr May Jun Apr Jul Apr Jun Apr Jul Apr Jun Jun Jan Jun Jun Jun Jun May Apr May Jun Apr Sep Sep Sep Aug Sep Sep Sep Aug Aug Sep Aug Sep Aug Sep Sep Sep Sep Sep Sep Sep Dates of Inspection Mar 1980 Aug 1981 Mar 1980 Sep 1978 Jan 1980 May 1981 Mar 1980 Jul 1980 Sep 1979 Jan 1980 Mar 1980 May 1980 Mar 1980 Jan 1980 Aug 1981 Jan 1980 Mar 1980 Mar 1980 Apr 1981 Jan 1981 Jul 1981 Jan 1981 May 1981 Apr 1981 May 1980 Oct 1980 Aug 1981 Sep 1981 Nov 1979 May 1981 Aug 1981 May 1978 Sep 1979 24-34 LOUISVILLE, KY., DISTRICT TABLE 24-K OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1981 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project' Report For Construction Maintenance Local Protection Projects: Completed: Boone County, KY. (Bank Protection & Repair Roads) Brookport, IL. Cannelton, IN. Cincinnati, OH. Covington, KY. Delphi, IN. (Wabash River) England Pond Levee, IL. (Wabash River) English, IN. (Little Blue River)2 Gill Township Levee Unit, IN. (Wabash River) Golconda, IL Grassy Creek, Jackson County, IN. (Muscatatuck River)2. Harrisburg, IL. Hawesville, KY. Indianapolis, IN. (Fall Creek Section) (White River) Indian Creek, Corydon, IN.2 Jackson, KY. (Kentucky River Basin) Jeffersonville-Clarksville, IN. Lawrenceburg, IN. Lebanon Junction, KY. (Salt River Basin)2 Levee Unit 8, IN. (White River) Louisville, KY.3 Lyford Levee Unit, IN. (Wabash River) Mason J. Niblack Levee, IN. (Wabash River) Mill Creek, Jefferson County, KY.2 Mount Carmel, IL. (Wabash River) Muncie, IN. (White River) Neon-Fleming, KY. (Kentucky River) New Albany, IN. Newburgh, IN.4 Newport, KY. Paducah, KY. Panther Creek, KY. (Green River Basin)2 Portland, IN. (Salamonie River)2 Reevesville, IL. (Cache River) Rochester & McCleary's Bluff Levee, IL. (Wabash River) Rosiclare, IL. Sturgis, KY. Taylorsville, KY. (Salt River) Tell City, IN. Terre Haute (Conover Levee) IN. (Wabash River) Town Creek, Harrodsburg, KY. 2 Triplett Creek, Morehead, KY. (Licking River)2 Uniontown, KY. Vincennes, IN. (Wabash River)5 West Terre Haute, IN. (Wabash River) Active: Chaplin River, Perryville, KY.2 Clear Creek, Franklin, OH. 2 Dicks Creek, Amanda Station, OH. 2 Inactive: Anderson, IN. (White River) Bonpas Creek, IL. (Wabash River Basin) Brevoort Levee, IN. (Wabash River) Caseyville, KY. Cloverport, KY. Shawneetown, IL. Concordia, KY. Frankfort, KY. (Kentucky River) (Benson Creek, North Frankfort and South Frankfort Sections) 6 Greenfield Bayou Levee, IN. (Wabash River) Indianapolis, IN. (Warfleigh Section) (White River) Island Levee, IN. (Wabash River) Levee Unit 1, IL. (Wabash River) Lewisport, KY. Marion, IN.(Wabash River) Metropolis, IL. New Harmony Bridge, IL. & IN. (Wabash River)2 1977 1958 1959 1957 1965 1953 1972 1965 1948 1960 1953 1952 1955 1953 1964 1957 1959 1953 1967 1952 1975 1944 1965 1973 1972 1956 1963 1957 1974 1959 1959 1970 1962 1954 1972 1954 1972 1952 1956 1965 1967 1972 1956 1964 1977 1940 1954 1979 1979 1976 1979 1973 1979 1959 24-35 $ 392,443 597,493 2,068,391 10,150,935 7,862,937 144,563 734,498 372,353 561,200 565,333 70,304 870,015 969,318 1,859,363 300,143 130,952 4,226,361 2,433,414 130,417 700,534 26,721,438 267,391 1,554,712 292,710 1,980,675 887,835 86,532 5,375,471 52,061 7,512,987 4,761,552 254,031 237,657 600,300 1,079,236 622,544 1,826,776 373,050 932,229 14,913 56,505 893,094 1,070,926 3,308,940 1,095,704 163,918 161,474 121,193 5,724 1,230,873 27,287 2,960,970 157,935 153,410 355,963 60,000 209,975 10,575 297,624 " REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 24-K OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS CONTINUED Project' Orleans, IN. Owensboro, KY. Salyersville, KY. (Licking River) Shoals, IN. (East Fork White River) Smithland, KY. Tolu, KY. Utica, IN. West Point, KY. Deauthorized August 5, 1977 under Section 12, Water Resources Development Act of 1974 (Public Law 93-251): Bellevue, KY. Bromley, KY. Carrollton, KY. Cave-in-Rock, IL. Cincinnati, OH. (Unit 2) Cincinnati, OH. (Unit 4) Cleves, OH. Clinton, IN. (Wabash River) Deer Creek, Prairie Levee, IN. (Wabash River) Derby, IN. Elizabethtown, IL. Fletcher and Sunshine Gardens Levee, IN. (Wabash River Basin) Grandview, IN. Honey Creek Levee, IN. (Wabash River) Leavenworth, IN. Levee Units 1,and 2, Eel River, IN. (Wabash River Basin) Levee Unit 2, IN. (White River) Levee Unit 3, IN. (East Fork White River) Levee Units 1 and 2, IL. (Wabash River) Levee Units 3 and 4, IL. (Wabash River) Levee Unit 6, IL. (Wabash River) Levee Units 9 and 10, IN. (White River) Ludlow, KY. Madison, IN. Mauckport, IN McGinnis Levee, IN.(Wabash River Basin) Milton, KY. Moscow, OH. New Amsterdam, IN. New Harmony, IN. (Wabash River) New Richmond, OH. Patriot, IN. Prestonville, KY. Raccoon Creek Levee, IN. (Wabash River) Rising Sun, IN. Rockport, IN. Rome, IN. Shufflebarger Levee, IN. (Wabash River Basin) Sugar Creek Levee, IN. (Wabash River Basin) Tri-Pond Levee, IL. (Wabash River) Troy, IN. Vevay, IN. Westport, KY. Deauthorized November 6, 1977 under Section 12, Water Resources Development Act of 1974, (Public Law 93-251): Aurora, IN. California (Cincinnati), OH. Reservoirs: Inactive: Big Blue Lake, IN. (Wabash River Basin) Big Pine Lake, IN. (Wabash River Basin) Big Walnut Lake, IN. (Wabash River Basin) Booneville Lake, KY. (Kentucky River) Clifty Creek Lake, IN. (White River) Eagle Creek Lake, KY. Helm Lake, IL. (Wabash River Basin) For Last Full Report See Annual Report For 1972 1946 1938 1938 1938 1938 1939 1950 1950 1961 1972 1980 1977 1980 1976 1979 1975 1976 Construction 13,158 12,000 4,490 12,853 9,713 6,343 6,848 3,361 8,497 Operation and Maintenance 275 216 9,922 14,503 71,049 7,104 64,487 28,061 65,510 35,420 16,465 1,079,867 1,270,590 1,009,188 1,038,595 1,016,358 702,471 41,616 24-36 Cost to Sep. 30, 1981 . .. LOUISVILLE, KY., DISTRICT TABLE 24-K OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS CONTINUED Project1 Lafayette Lake, IN. (Wabash River Basin) Lincoln Lake, II. (Wabash River Basin) Mining City Lake, KY. (Green River) Red River Lake, KY. (Kentucky River) 1. All projects are on Ohio River unless otherwise noted. 2. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under Section 205, 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. 3. Cost includes $1,716,301 cash contribution from City of Louisville. For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1981 Full Report See Annual Operation and Report For Construction Maintenance 1977 1,200,920 1979 1,331,844 - 350,474 1976 1,794,308 4. The Water Resources Development Act of 1974 modified the Newburgh Locks & Dam project to include the bank protection works at Newburgh, IN. 5. Partially completed to form a useful unit. Remaining portion of project deferred. 6. Cost includes $161,098 contributed funds. 24-37 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 24-L FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Fiscal Year Cost Flood Control: Bonpas Creek, Massac Co., IL.2 $ 7,010 Bonpas Creek, IL.1 56,178 Canoe Creek, Henderson, KY.1 87,528 Chaplin River at Perryville, KY.1 3 64,090 Clear Creek, Franklin, OH.3 612 Dicks Creek, Amanda Station, OH. 1 3 10,045 Duck Creek, Elwood, IN.12 33,642 Hodges Branch, Rushville, IN. 18,636 Houston Creek, Paris, KY.2 7,490 McCullough Run, Newtown, OH.2 4,929 Miami River at Carlisle, OH. 7,711 Mississinewa River, Randolph Co., IN.2 4,941 Southside Ditch, Princeton, IN. 291 Triplett Creek, Farmers, KY.1 14,739 Whitewater River, Hagerstown, IN.1 2 34,756 Snagging and Clearing for Flood Control: Chaplin River, Cornishville, KY.2 4,900 Lick Creek, Hartford City, IN.1,2 17,789 Patoka River, Gibson Co., IN.2 4,258 Salamonie River, Montpelier, IN.1 32,850 Town Fork, Nicholasville, KY.4 2,170 Upper Wabash River, Adams County, IN. 5 111,673 Emergency Bank Protection: Falling Run, New Albany, IN.2 565 Great Miami River, Sidney, OH.2 3 11,607 Licking River, Butler, KY.2 3 17,352 Lusk Creek, Golconda, IL.3 10,541 Ohio River, Brandenburg, KY.5 159,919 Ohio River, Cloverport, KY.5 183,671 Ohio River, Hancock Co., KY.3 6,880 Ohio River, HWY 666, Cannelton, IN.2 7,470 Ohio River, Lewisport, KY.2 7,494 Ohio River, Madison, IN.5 51,470 Ohio River, Ohio Street, Evansville, IN.5 108,837 Ohio River, Otter Creek Park, KY.3 4 23,271 Ohio River, Owensboro, KY.2 3 10,892 Wabash River, Lafayette, IN.2 7,453 White River, Brownstown, IN. 4 22,950 1. Detailed Project Report 2. Reconnaissance Report 3. Plans and Specifications 4. Construction Funds Received 5. Construction Completed TABLE 24-M FLOOD PLAIN STUDIES COMPLETED DURING FISCAL YEAR (See Section 44 of Text) None. 24-38 HUNTINGTON, W.VA., DISTRICT* All cost and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter This district comprises central and southeastern Ohio, all but northern panhandle and northeastern portion of West Virginia, eastern Kentucky, a portion of midwestern Virginia, a very small portion of northwestern North Carolina, embraced in drainage basin of Ohio River and its tributaries from about mile 127 (below Pittsburgh Pa.) to mile 438, immediately upstream from Foster, Ky. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Construction of locks and dams on Ohio River ........................ 25-2 2. Kanawha River, W.Va.............. 25-2 3. Open-Channel Work, Ohio River ..... 25-2 4. Other authorized navigation projects .......................... 25-2 Flood Control - Local Protection 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. Chillicothe, Ohio ................... Levisa and Tug Forks of the Big Sandy River, and Cumberland River, Ky, W.Va., and Ky................ Martin, Ky ....................... Massillon, Ohio .................... Newark, Ohio ...................... Oceana, W .Va .................... Roseville, Ohio ................... .. 25-2 25-3 25-3 25-3 25-4 25-4 25-5 Flood Control- Reservoirs 12. Alum Creek Lake, Ohio ............. 25-5 13. Beech Fork Lake, W.Va. ........... 25-5 14. Bluestone Lake, Ohio River Basin, W.Va............................ 25-6 15. Burnsville, Lake, Ohio River Basin, W.Va. ........................... 25-6 16. Deer Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, Ohio ........................... . 25-7 17. Delaware Lake, Ohio River Basin, Ohio ............................ 25-7 18. Dewey Lake, Ohio River Basin, Ky. .. 25-7 19. Dillon Lake, Ohio River Basin, Ohio ............................ 25-8 20. East Lynn Lake, Ohio River Basin, W.Va............................. 25-8 Flood Control Reservoirs (Cont'd) Page 21. Fishtrap Lake, Ohio River Basin ..... 25-9 22. Grayson Lake, Ky ................ 25-9 23. John W. Flannagan Dam and Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, Va .......... 25-9 24. Kehioe Lake, Ky ................... 25-10 25. Mill Creek Lake, Ohio ............ 25-10 26. Muskingum River Lakes, Ohio...... 25-11 27. North Branch of Kokosing River Lake, Ohio ....................... 25-11 28. North Fork of Pound River Lake, Va........................ 25-12 29. Ohio River Basin (Huntington District) ........................ 25-12 30. Paint Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin ................................. 25-12 31. Paintsville Lake, Ky ............... 25-12 32. R. D. Bailey Lake, W.Va........... 25-13 33. Summersville Lake, Ohio River Basin, W.Va. .................... 25-13 34. Sutton Lake, Ohio River Basin W.Va. .......................... 25-14 35. Tom Jenkins Dam, Ohio River Basin, Ohio ..................... 25-14 36. Yatesville Lake, Ky. ............... 25-14 37. Inspection of completed flood control projects .................. 25-15 38. Other authorized flood control projects.......................... 25-15 39. Flood control work under special authorization ..................... 25-I5 General Investigations 40. 41. 42. Surveys ........................ Collection and study of basic data ... Research and development.......... 25-15 25-15 25-15 25-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 Navigation 1. CONSTRUCTION OF LOCKS AND DAMS ON OHIO RIVER See this heading under Ohio River Portion. 2. KANAWHA RIVER, WEST VIRGINIA Location. The Kanawha River is 97 miles in length and is formed by the junction of the New and Gauley Rivers a short distance above Kanawha Falls, W.Va., and flows generally northwesterly to the confluence with the Ohio River at Point Pleasant, W.Va. Previous Projects. For details of previous projects see page 90-98 of the 1875 Annual Report, page 1913 of the 1915 Annual Report, and page 1309 of the 1938 Annual Report. Existing project. The existing project consists of three navigation dams on the Kanawha River. Each structure has twin locks with usable dimensions of 56 feet by 360 feet. One dam is located on the Ohio River near Gallipolis, Ohio. This structure has two locks, one is 110 feet by 600 feet and the other is 110 feet by 360 feet. This system of locks and dams provides a navigable depth of 9 feet form the mouth of the Kanawha River to a point approximately 91 miles upstream. For authorization of the existing project see page 1152 of the 1962 Annual Report. New work for the existing project was completed at a cost of $22, 872,770. Local cooperation. No local cooperation required. Licenses. The Kanawha Valley Power Corp., under licenses issued by the Federal Power Commission, constructed hydroelectric power plants at the three locks and dams on the Kanawha River. License fees under License No. 1175 for London and Marmet Locks and Dams are 132,000 annually and $1,504,000 cumulative through CY 1980 for each installation. License fees under License No. 1290 for Winfield Locks and Dam are $40,000 annually and $3,832,000 cumulative through CY 1980. Terminal facilities. There are 79 terminals along the Kanawha River located from the mouth of the river to 30 miles east of Charleston, W.Va. These terminals are constructed principally of steel and wood mooring piles and steel sheet pile mooring cells. Seventeen of these terminals have railroad connections. One terminal, a paved wharf, is owned by the City of Charleston. The remaining terminals are privately owned. The principal commodities handled are coal, chemicals, acids, cement, gasoline and oil, and sand and gravel. For further information see page 1152 of the 1962 Annual Report. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance, general: The locks and dams were operated as required and necessary repairs and improvements were made to the locks and dams as well as the appurtenant structures and grounds. Channel inspections were conducted periodically. Planning was initiated for recreation facilities under the recreation at completed projects program. Condition at end offiscal year. Construction was initiated in 1931 and completed in 1937. All structures are in operation with a navigable depth of nine feet through the project reach. For details of locks and dam see page 1153 of the 1962 Annual Report. See also Table 25-B for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1981. 3. OPEN CHANNEL WORK, OHIO RIVER See this heading under Chapter 22-Ohio River. 4. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS See Table 25-C. 5. CHILLICOTHE, OHIO Location. The project is located in Ross County, Ohio, along the right bank of the Scioto River, 69 miles above the confluence with the Ohio River. Existing project. The existing project provides for the construction of 10,805 feet of earth levee, four gate openings and four pump stations. The project was authorized for construction by the 1962 Flood Control Act. The full funding estimate for new work is $22,100,000 of which $21,562,000 is to be allocated and expended by the Federal Government. The Sponsor, in addition to incurring $2,390,000 in non-Federal costs, will reimburse the Federal Government $518,000 for the non-Federal share of recreational development costs. 25-2 HUNTINGTON. W.VA., DISTRICT Local cooperation. All local interest requirements are complete. For further details see the 1978 Annual Report. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering studies continued. The contract for Local Protection Project (Part III), Pump Stations, awarded in September 1980 is 67% complete. Condition at end of fiscal year. The contracts for construction of Local Protection, (Part 1), and Local Protection, (Part II) are complete. 6. LEVISA AND TUG FORKS OF THE BIG SANDY RIVER AND CUMBERLAND RIVER, W.VA., VA., AND KY. Location. The Levisa and Tug Forks form the Big Sandy River at Louisa, Kentucky. The Cumberland portion is the Upper Cumberland River Basin, above Cumberland Falls, Kentucky. The basin is approximately 100 miles in length and averages approximately 30 miles in width in the lower portion and approximately 10 miles in width above Harlan, Kentucky. The Big Sandy Basin is within the Huntington District, and the Cumberland Basin is within the Nashville District. This report covers only that portion of the project located in the Huntington District. Existing Project. The existing project was authorized by Section 202 of Public Law 96-367, and directed the design and construction, at full Federal expense, of a comprehensive flood damage reduction plan to include; floodwall/levee projects for nine of the valley's major community centers; voluntary relocation of existing development which is below the 100-year frequency or the April 1977 flood, whichever affords the greatest level of protection, into new flood safe housing and community development sites at the Matewan Big Bend Cutoff/Fill Project, as well as at other new housing and community development sites to be constructed throughout the valley; the creation of flood-safe developable land to accommodate the anticpated future residential growth; and provisions for physically relocating or flood proofing by raising in place sound existing development located below the 100-year flood frequency level or the April 1977 flood level, whichever affords the greatest protection. The estimated full funding Federal cost of the project is $702,000,000, of which $621,000,000 is the Huntington District portion and $81,000,000 is the Nashville District portion. Local cooperation. No local cooperation is required. Operations and results during thefiscal year. New Work: The Tug Fork Phase I final report is scheduled for submission in January 1982. Condition at the end of fiscal year. Aerial photography for the Levisa and Tug Forks has been completed and mapping and foundation and borrow exploration have been initiated. 7. MARTIN, KENTUCKY Location. The project is located in Floyd County, Ky., approximately 5.5 miles above the mouth of Beaver Creek, a tributary of Levisa Fork of the Big Sandy River. Existingproject. The existing project provides for construction of approximately 4.5 miles of channel improvement along Beaver Creek beginning at a point approximately 2.3 miles above the junction of the Right and Left Forks. The improved channel will have a bottom width of 75 feet, riprap will be placed along the outside of all channel bends, and both sides and channel bottom through three bridges. The project will reduce major floods at Martin by about 5.7 feet. The total estimated cost of new work (1981) is $10,190,000. Federal cost is $9,850,000 and non-Federal cost is $340,000 for lands and damages and utility adjustments. The project was authorized by the 1965 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 246, 89th Congress). Local cooperation. Responsible local interests are required to provide the necessary lands, easements, rights-of-way; to hold and save the United States free from damages; to maintain the project after completion; to provide necessary relocations; and to prevent any encroachments on the capacities of the channel within the limits of the project. By letter, dated October 26, 1971, The Fiscal Court of Floyd County, Ky., furnished an amendment to the resolution of assurance of local cooperation. Operations and results during fiscal year. To date 67% of the tracts required by the project have been acquired by the Sponsor. 8. MASSILLON, OHIO Location. The project is located in Stark County, on the Tuscarawas River, 200 miles above the mouth of the Muskingum River. 25-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 Existing project. The existing project consists of channel improvement to the Tuscarawas River, combined with construction of drainage facilities, levees and pump stations. For further details see page 1156 of the 1962 Annual Report. The existing project was selected for construction under the general authority for the Ohio River Basin, in the 1938 Flood Control Act. The project was constructed at a total Federal cost of $8,139,406. Local cooperation. No local cooperation is required. See page 1156 of the 1962 Annual Report for details of local contributions of work beyond the scope of the project. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operations and maintenance, general: Routine inspections were conducted to determine that the improved channel was maintained in satisfactory condition. Condition at end offiscal year. Construction was initiated in July 1940 and completed in October 1951. The drainage structures and appurtenances, including pressure conduits, gate openings, and pump stations, have been turned over to the city for maintenance and operation. The channels and levees maintained by the United States are in good condition. 9. NEWARK, OHIO Location. The project is located in Licking County at the junction of the North and South Forks of the Licking River, 29 miles above the confluence with the Muskingum River at Zanesville, Ohio. Existing project. The existing project consists of 31,500 feet of channel improvements on the Licking River, North and South Forks of Licking River, and Raccoon Creek, and a pump station for disposal of interior drainage. The existing project was selected for construction under the general authority for the Ohio River Basin in the 1938 Flood Control Act. The existing Newark Local Protection Project was modified by the 1968 Flood Control Act to include improvement of the interior drainage facilities, construction of Log Pond Run diversion and modification of North Fork Channel. The full funding for new work is $14,580,000 of which $10,800,000 is to be allocated and expended by the Federal Government. The sponsor is estimated to incur an estimated $3,780,000 in non- Federal cost. Local cooperation. All local requirements for existing project have been met. Local interests, for the proposed project, are required to furnish all land, easements, and rights-of-way; hold and save the United States free from damages and provide all necessary relocations. Local requirements for the Log Pond Run Diversion have been completed. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: North Fork Channel; As a result of the withdrawal of State support from the proposed Utica Lake project and the interdependency of the operation of Utica Lake with the North Fork Channel, the North Fork Channel must be reformulated. A reanalysis is underway. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was initiated in July 1940 and completed in November 1941. The pump facilities and levees were turned over to the city for maintenance and operation. Proposed project: Additional economic feasibility studies for the Interior Drainage portion of the project required. The contract for the Log Pond Run Diversion Channel was awarded in September 1980, is 93% complete. 10. OCEANA, WEST VIRGINIA Location. The project is located in Wyoming County on Clear Fork, 26 miles above the confluence of Clear Fork and the Guyandotte River. Existing project. The existing project consists of a channel modification starting at the confluence of Clear Fork and Laurel Fork extending down Clear Fork for approximately 4.7 miles. The channel modification will, generally, follow the natural stream alignment and have a floodway width of 100 feet. The total estimated cost of new work (1979) is $5,140,000 which includes $850,000 non-Federal cost for land and damages and utility adjustments and $88,000 non-Federal cost for recreation cost sharing. The project was authorized under Section 201 of the Flood Control Act of 1965. Approved by the Senate Public Works Committee in June 1975 and the House Committee in September 1976. Local cooperation. Local interest must agree to furnish all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and relocations necessary for construction, cost share the recreation development and operate and maintain the project following construction. The Wyoming County Court and the Town Council of Oceana passed resolutions in November 1973 and December 1973 providing assurances of local cooperation. 25-4 HUNTINGTON. W.VA., DISTRICT Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering studies are continuing. Condition at end offiscal year. Both the Town of Oceana and the Wyoming County Commission have informally indicated that they would not be able to bear the cost of the non-federal work. However, efforts to obtain letters of support or nonsupport of the project have been unsuccessful. Work on the final GDM has been suspended pending final statements from the Town of Oceana and Wyoming County. 11. ROSEVILLE, OHIO Location. The project is located in Muskingum and Percy Counties, an Maxahala Creek, approximately six miles above the confluence with Jonathan Creek, a tributary of the Muskingum River. Existing project. The existing project consists of 7,290 feet of channel improvement; 6,400 feet of levee and railroad embankment enlargement; and the necessary appurtenances for disposal of interior drainage. The project was selected for construction under the general authorization of the Ohio River Basin in the 1938 Flood Control Act. Total Federal cost of the project as completed was $910,785. Local cooperation. All local requirements have been fully complied with. Total costs of all requirements under the terms of the authorized project were $62,000. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance, general: Routine inspec-tions of the improved portion of the project were conducted. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project, initiated in August 1959, is complete. 12. ALUM CREEK LAKE, OHIO Location. The damsite is located in Delaware County, Ohio, on Alum Creek, a tributary of Big Walnut Creek, approximately 26 miles above the mouth of Alum Creek and 15 miles north of Columbus, Ohio, and approximately 157 miles above the mouth of the Scioto River. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rolled earth-filled dam 93 feet high and 10,000 feet long with a gate controlled spillway located in the right abutment. The reservoir provides a total storage of 134,800 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of 123 square miles. The reservoir is being operated as a unit of the coordinated reservoir system for protection of Columbus, Ohio, lower Alum Creek and Scioto and Ohio Valleys, generally. The project was authorized for construction by the 1962 Flood Control Act. The full funding estimate for new work is $56,700,000 which is to be appropriated and expended by the Government. The sponsor will reimburse the Government an estimated $27,910,000, exclusive of interest, for costs allocated to water supply. Local cooperation. Non-Federal intersts are required to operate and maintain the proposed fish and wildlife recreation families; to reimburse the Federal Government for the cost of water supply feature, and to pay the cost of operation and maintenance of water supply facilities. The State of Ohio has executed a contract to operate and maintain recreation facilities. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering studies for remaining work items continued. During the fiscal year, six tracts of land were acquired. The contract for construction of Day Use Marina Boat Launching Ramp and Sand Beaches, awarded in September 1981 is essentially complete. Operations and Maintenance, general. The reservoir was operated for the benefit of flood control as required, and necessary repairs were made to the structures and appurtenances. The project prevented an estimated $4,218,000 in flood damage during the fiscal year. Condition at end of fiscal year. State officials have been notified that the project is operable for Phase I (15 mgd) water supply. Payments are being received for the water supply facilities. The dam is complete and is being operated for flood control. Construction of the dam was initiated in 1970 and completed in 1975. The 405 tracts of land required by the project have been acquired. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $34,568,000 in flood damages. 13. BEECH FORK LAKE, WEST VIRGINIA Location. The damsite is located in Wayne County, W.Va., on Beech Fork Creek, a tributary of Twelvepole Creek, approximately 4 miles above the mouth of Beech Fork Creek and 20 miles above the confluence of Twelvepole Creek and the Ohio River. 25-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 Existing project. The existing project consists of a rolled earth-fill dam approximately 86 feet high and 1,080 feet long, an uncontrolled spillway landward of the left abutment of the dam and an outlet tunnel through the left abutment of the dam with a control structure at the upstream end. The reservoir provides a total storage of 37,540 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 78 square miles. The project is being operated as a unit of the coordinated reservoir system for protection of Lavalette, W.Va., and Twelvepole and Ohio Valleys, generally. The project was authorized under the 1962 Flood Control Act. The full funding estimate for new work is $47,300,000. Location cooperation. No local cooperation is required. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering studies for remaining work items continued. Operations and Maintenance, general. The project prevented an estimated $3,000 in flood damages during the fiscal year. Condition at end offiscal year. The project is fully operational and the 485 tracts required have been acquired. Engineering for remaining public use facilities is continuing. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $2,466,000 in flood damages. 14. BLUESTONE LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, WEST VIRGINIA Location. The dam is located on the New River in Summers County, W. Va., approximately 3 miles above Hinton, W. Va., and one mile from the confluence of the New and Greenbrier Rivers. The reservoir is located in Summers County, W. Va., and Giles County, Va. Existing project. The existing project consists of a concrete gravity dam with a maximum height of 180 feet and an overall length of 2,048 feet. Appurtenant structures consist of a gated spillway in the channel section of the dam which is 790 feet in length; the stilling pool is formed by a 23 foot high weir located 364 feet downstream of the axis of the dam; the outlet works consists of 16 gated sluices through the spillway section and discharging into the stilling pool. Penstocks were installed to permit future installation of power facilities. The reservoir extends approximately 36 miles upstream and provides for a gross storage of 631,000 acre-feet. The Federal cost of the project is $29,457,603, which includes expenditures for recreation under the completed project program. The existing project was authorized by the Flood Control Acts of June 22, 1936 and June 28, 1938. For further details see page 1453 of the 1939 Annual Report and pages 1173 and 1174 of the 1962 Annual Report. Local cooperation. No local cooperation required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: The reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Facilities for accommodation and protection of the visiting public were maintained in good condition. The project prevented flood damages estimated to be $7,000 during the fiscal year. Condition at end of fiscal year. The dam is complete and the reservoir is in operation as the unit of the coordinated reservoir system for the protection of the New, Kanawha, and Ohio Valleys, generally. Construction of the dam was initiated in January 1942 and completed in April 1952. Total land acquired was 338 tracts of fee acquisition and 91 tracts of flowage easements. To date the project has prevented an estimated $519,943,000 in flood damages. 15. BURNSVILLE LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, W. VA. Location. The damsite is located in Braxton County, W. Va., on the Little Kanawha River approximately 2 miles above Burnsville, W. Va., and 124 miles above the confluence of the Little Kanawha and Ohio Rivers. Existing project. The existing project consists of an earth embankment dam approximately 80 feet high and 1,000 feet long with a gated spillway in the left abutment. The outlet works is an integral prat of the spillway, consisting of five sluice gates and one lowflow sluice. The reservoir provides for a total storage of-65,400 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of 165 square miles. The reservoir is being operated as a unit of the coordinated reservoir system for the protection of Burnsville and the Little Kanawha and Ohio Valleys generally. The project was selected for construction under the general authority for the Ohio River Basin in the 1938 Flood Control Act. The full funding estimate for new work is $55,300,000. Local cooperation. No local cooperation is required. 25-6 HUNTINGTON. W.VA., DISTRICT Operations and results during thefiscal year. New work: The contract for construction of Recreation Facilities was awarded in September 1981, no work was initiated. During the fiscal year nine tracts of land were acquired. Operations and Maintenance, general. The project was operated for the benefit of flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structures and appurtenances. The project prevented local damages estimated to be $502,000 during the fiscal year. Condition at end of fiscal year. Major construction is complete except for public use facilities. To date 347 tracts of land have been acquired. To date the project has prevented an estimated $16,512,000 in flood damages. 16. DEER CREEK LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OHIO Location. The damsite is located in Pickaway County, Ohio, on Deer Creek, a tributary of the Scioto River, approximately 21 miles above the mouth of Deer Creek and approximately 106 miles above the mouth of the Scioto River. Existing project. The project consists of a rolled earth-filled dam 93 feet in height and 3,880 feet in length, a 741-foot concrete gravity channel section controlled by three tainter gates, an outlet works consisting of five gated sluices through a concrete spillway section discharging into a stilling basin and an earth dike 15 feet by 4,600 feet in a saddle located approximately 4 miles southwest of the damsite. The reservoir provides a total storage of 102,540 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 278 square miles. For further project details see page 969 of the 1965 Annual Report. The project was selected for construction under general authority for the Ohio River Basin in the 1938 Flood Control Act. The Federal cost for the project is $20,406,545 including expenditures for recreation under the completed project program. Local cooperation. Non-Federal interests are required to operate and maintain the fish and wildlife facilities. The State of Ohio is operating and maintaining these facilities. Operation and results during fiscal year. Operations and maintenance, general: The reservoir was operated for flood control, as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. The project prevented an estimated $343,000 in flood damages during the fiscal year. Condition at end of fiscal year. All major construction work is complete. The 138 tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. To date the project has prevented an estimated $14,221,000 in flood damages. 17. DELAWARE LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OHIO Location. The dam is located on the Olentangy River approximately 6 miles above and north of Delaware, Ohio, and approximately 32 miles above the confluence of the Olentangy and Scioto Rivers at Columbus, Ohio. The reservoir is located in Delaware, Marion, and Morrow Counties, Ohio. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rolled earth-fill dam with a gate controlled gravity ogee-type spillway and five outlet conduits in the channel. The dam is approximately 18,600 feet in length and 92 feet in height. The project provides for storage of 132,800 acre-feet from a drainage area of approximately 381 square miles. For further details see page 1160 of the 1962 Annual Report. The project was authorized by the 1938 Flood Control Act. The Federal cost of the project was $7,631,821. Local cooperation. No local cooperation required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operations and maintenance, general: The reservoir was operated for the benefit of flood control, as required, and necessary repairs were made to the structures and appurtenances. The project prevented an estimated $797,000 in flood damages during the fiscal year. Condition at end of fiscal year. The dam and appurtenances are complete and the reservoir is in operation as a unit of the coordinated reservoir system for the protection of the Olentangy, Scioto, and Ohio Valleys, generally. Construction of the dam was initiated in April 1946 and completed in July 1978. All construction was completed in October 1951. Total real estate requirements of 7,703 acres of fee acquisition and 2,428 acres of flowage easements have been completed. To date the project has prevented an estimated $50,759,000 in flood damages. 18. DEWEY LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, KENTUCKY Location. The dam is located on Johns Creek, approximately 7 miles southeast of Paintsville, Ky., 25-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 and approximately 6 miles above the confluence of Johns Creek and Levisa Fork of the Big Sandy River. Existing project. The project consists of a rolled earthfill dam 118 feet in height and 913 feet in length, a controlled outlet works discharging through a tunnel in the left abutment, an uncontrolled spillway through a channel excavated in the left abutment, and a rolled earthfill dike blocking a low divide to Brandykeg Creek and Levisa Fork. The reservoir provides storage of 93,300 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 207 square miles. For further project detail see page 940 of the 1965 Annual Report. The project was selected for construction under the general authorization contained in the 1938 Flood Control Act. The Federal cost of the project is $7,845,569, including expenditures for recreation under the completed projects program. Local cooperation. No local cooperation required. Operations and results during fiscal year. The reser-voir was operated for the benefit of flood control, as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. The project prevented an estimated $153,000 in flood damages during the fiscal year. Condition at end of fiscal year. The dam is complete and is being operated as a unit of the coordinated reservoir system for the protection of Levisa Fork, Big Sandy and Ohio Valleys, generally. Construction of the dam was initiated in March 1946 and was completed in July 1949. Total acreage acquired for the project was 12,458 acres in fee and 1,170 acres in flowage easements. To date the project has prevented an estimated $40,684,000 in flood damages. 19. DILLON LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OHIO Location. The damsite is located on the Licking River, approximately 6 miles above the confluence of the Licking and Muskingum Rivers at Zanesville, Ohio. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rolled earthfill dam with a maximum height of 118 feet and a maximum length of 1,400 feet, a controlled outlet works discharging through a 20- foot conduit in the right abutment, and ungated 280-foot spillway adjacent to the left abutment of the dam, and two rolled earthfill dikes. The reservoir provides for storage of 261,110 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of 748 square miles. For further project details see page 1162 of the 1962 Annual Report. The existing project was selected for construction under the general authority for the Ohio River Basin in the 1938 Flood Control Act. The Federal cost for new work was $30,218,135. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operations and maintenance, general: The reservoir was operated for the benefit of flood control, as required, and necessary repairs were made to the structures and appurtenances. The project prevented an estimated $8,004,000 in flood damages during the fiscal year. Condition at end of fiscal year. The dam is complete and the reservoir is in operation as a unit of the coordinated reservoir system for the protection of Zanesville, Ohio, and the Muskingum and Ohio Valleys, generally. Construction of the project was initiated in July 1946 and completed in July 1959. Total real estate acquired for the project consists of 8,232 acres in fee and 5,380 acres of flowage easements. To date the project has prevented an estimated $82,854,000 in flood damages. 20. EAST LYNN LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, WEST VIRGINIA Location. The damsite is located in Wayne County, W. Va., on the East Fork of Twelvepole Creek, approximately 10 miles above the mouth of East Fork and 42 miles above the confluence of Twelvepole Creek and the Ohio River. Existing project. The existing project consists of an earthfill dam with a maximum height of 113 feet, a top length of 638 feet and a top width of 32 feet, an uncontrolled spillway near the left abutment, and a 13-foot reinforced concrete tunnel in the right abutment with a control structure at the upstream end. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 82,500 acre-feet from a drainage area of 133 square miles. The reservoir is operated as a unit of the coordinated reservoir system for the protection of East Lynn and Wayne, W. Va., and for Twelvepole Creek and Ohio River Valleys, generally. The existing project was selected for construction under the general authority for the Ohio River Basin in the 1938 Flood Control Act. The estimated Federal cost for new work is $34,826,000. Local cooperation. No local cooperation is required. 25-8 HUNTINGTON. W.VA., DISTRICT Operation and results during fiscal year. All major items of construction are complete. The final recreation contract, for expansion of East Fork facilities and construction of Overlook Point, initiated in October 1979 is complete. Operations and maintenance, general. The reservoir was operated for the benefit of flood control, as required and necessary repairs were made to the structures and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project prevented flood damages estimated to be $4,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. All major construc-tion is complete. The required 552 tracts of land have been acquired. To date the project has prevented an estimated $33,416,000 in flood damages. 21. FISHTRAP LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, KENTUCKY Location. The damsite is located on Levisa Fork in Pike County, Ky., approximately 3 miles above the confluence of Levisa and Russell Forks and 103 miles above the mouth of Levisa Fork. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rockfill dam with a maximum height of 195 feet, an overall length of 1,100 and a width of 32 feet. An excavated spillway is located in the left abutment and is controlled by four tainter gates. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 164,360 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of 395 square miles. The reservoir is being operated as a unit of the coordinated reservoir system for the protection of Levisa Fork and Big Sandy River Valleys, generally, and to a lesser degree, the Ohio River Valley. The existing project was selected for construction under the general authority for the Ohio River Basin in the 1938 Flood Control Act. The Federal cost for new work was $54,566,094, which includes expenditures for recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Local cooperation. No local cooperation is required. Operations and results during fiscal year. The reservoir was operated for the benefit of flood control, as required, and the necessary repairs were made to the structures and appurtenances. The project prevented an estimated $198,000 in flood damages during the fiscal year. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction is complete. All 1,301 tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. To date the project has prevented an estimated $179,346,000 in flood damages. 22. GRAYSON LAKE, KENTUCKY Location. The damsite is located on the Little Sandy River approximately 49 miles above the confluence with the Ohio River and 11 miles upstream from Grayson, Ky. Existing project. The existing project consists of a random earthfill dam with a maximum height of 120 feet and crest length of 1,460 feet, a controlled outlet works discharging through a 14-foot spillway beyond the left abutment. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 119,000 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of 196 square miles. The reservoir is being operated as a unit of the coordinated reservoir system for the protection of Grayson, Ky., and the Little Sandy and Ohio River Valleys, generally. The existing project was selected for construction under the general authority for the Ohio River Basin in the 1960 Flood Control Act. The Federal cost of new work was $19,087,173, which includes expenditures for future recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Local cooperation. No local cooperation is required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operations and maintenance, general: The reservoir was operated for flood control, as required and necessary repairs were made to the structures and appurtenances. The contract for construction of Below Dam Public Use Facilities, under the recreation at completed projects program was awarded in March 1981 and is 84% complete. Condition at end of fiscal year. All major construction is complete. The 484 tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. To date the project has prevented an estimated $28,924,000 in flood damages. 23. JOHN W. FLANNAGAN DAM AND RESERVOIR, OHIO RIVER BASIN, VIRGINIA Location. The damsite is located on the Pound River in Dickenson County, Va., approximately 2 miles above the confluence of Russell Fork and the Pound River and 150 miles above the mouth of the Big Sandy River. 25-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 Existing project. The existing project consists of a rockfill dam with a maximum height of 252 feet, a top length of 970 feet, a top width of 30 feet and a base width of 1,030 feet. An outlet tunnel located near the left abutmentwith a control structure at the upstream end. A spillway controlled by six tainter gates is located in a saddle just upstream from the damsite. The reservoir provides for storage of 145,700 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of 222 square miles. The existing project was selected for construction under the general authority for the Ohio River Basin in the 1938 Flood Control Act. The project has been modified to provide water quality control features by adding control gates to previously uncontrolled spillway, which increased the total storage capacity by 39,000 acre-feet. The Federal cost for new work was $20,311,598, which includes expenditures for future recreation under the completed projects program. Local cooperation. No local cooperation is required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operations and maintenance, general: The reservoir was operated for flood control, as required, and necessary repairs were made to the structures and appurtenances. The project prevented flood damages estimated to be $31,000 during the fiscal year. Condition at end of fiscal year. All major construction is complete. The 382 tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. To date the project has prevented an estimated $108,271,000 in flood damages. 24. KEHOE LAKE, KENTUCKY Location. The damsite is located on the Greenup- Carter County line on Tygarts Creek, a tributary of the Ohio River approximately 48 miles above the mouth of Tygarts Creek and approximately 2 miles above Kehoe, Ky. Existingproject. The existing project provides for construction of a rockfill dam 101 feet in height and 1,265 feet in length, and uncontrolled spillway located upstream of the right abutment of the dam, and an upstream controlled outlet works with a tunnel through the left abutment. The reservoir will provide a total storage of 48,048 acre-feet and control a drainage area of 127 square miles. The reservoir will be operated as a unit of the coordinated reservoir system for the protection of Kehoe and Tygarts and Ohio Valleys, generally. The total estimated cost of new work (1978) is $43,300,000 which is to be appropriated and expended by the Federal Government. The sponsor is required to reimburse the Federal Government $4,670,000, for the non-Federal share of initial recreation development. The project was authorized by the 1966 Flood Control Act. (H. Doc. 517,89 Congress). Local cooperation. Local interests are required to contribute that portion of recreation costs that exceed the portion permitted to be borne by the Federal Government under Public Law 89-72. Section 221 assurances (P.L.91-611) were signed by the Commonwealth of Kentucky and approved by the Federal Government in June 1973. The recreation cost sharing contract was not signed by the Secretary of the Army. Operations and results during fiscal year. The deletion of water quality control as a project purpose required project reformulation. All design work has been curtailed. For further details see the 1980 Annual Report. Condition at end of fiscal year. All preconstruction activities are complete. 25. MILL CREEK LAKE, OHIO Location. The damsite is located in Union and Delaware Counties, on Mill Creek, a tributary of the Scioto River, approximately 2 miles above the mouth of Scioto River. Existing project. The existing project provides the construction of a rolled-earthfill dam 85 feet in height and 11,800 feet in length, a gated spillway controlled by three tainter gates in the right abutment, an outlet works consisting of three multilevel intakes, three sections of earth dike, and one levee with a pump station and appurtenances for the protection of Ostrander, Ohio. The reservoir will provide a total storage of 84,694 acre-feet and control a drainage area of 181 square miles. The reservoir will be operated as a unit of the coordinated reservoir systems for the protection of the Scioto and Ohio River Valleys, generally, and contribute to reductions of flooding at industrial and population centers at Columbus and Chillicothe. The project was authorized for construction under the 1962 Flood Control Act. The estimated Federal cost of the project (1977) is $72,900,000. Local cooperation. Local interests are required to operate and maintain the fish and wildlife facilities. 25-10 HUNTINGTON. W.VA., DISTRICT Operations and results during year. Preconstruction planning is complete and engineering studies are suspended. Condition at end offiscal year. The District is in the process of reporting the project for deauthorization as a result of no state support for the project. The State of Ohio awarded a contract for the reconstruction of State Route 36 in March 1972. The reconstructed route is entirely within the proposed reservoir boundary. Total Federal cost of this reconstruction was $594,474.48. 26. MUSKINGUM RIVER LAKES, OHIO Location. The Muskingum River lies in southeast Ohio and, including tributaries, drains approximately 8,000 square miles. The headwaters rise about 25 miles south of Lake Erie and flow into the Ohio River at Marietta, Ohio, 172 miles below Pittsburgh, Pa. Existing project. The existing project consists of the construction and operations and maintenance of 14 reservoirs and appurtenant works in the Muskingum River Basin. The existing project was originally authorized by the Public Works Administration in February 1934. The project was initially operated and maintained by the Muskingum Watershed Conservancy District of Ohio, the sponsoring agency, from July 1938 to August 1939 when operation and maintenance became the responsibility of the Corps of Engineers in accordance with the provisions of the 1939 Flood Control Act. For further details see page 1157 of the 1962 Annual Report. The cost of new work to date is $41,246,016, which includes expenditures for recreation under the completed projects program. Local cooperation. All requirements for local cooperation have been fully complied with. For further details see page 1257 of the 1942 Annual Report. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Planning of recreation facilities was continued under the completed projects program. A significant Major Rehabilitation program was approved in December 1977 in order to assure the safety of the 14 older projects under the originally designed maximum pool conditions. The contract for Grouting of Abutments at Clendening and Leesville Dams and Constructing Weirs at Clendening and Atwood Dam was awarded in October 1980 and is 91% complete: The contract for Construction of Relief Well System at Bolivar Dam and Field Office at Dover Dam was awarded in March 1981 and is 46% complete. The contract for construction of B&O Railroad Closure, Beach City Lake was awarded in May 1981 and is 66% complete. The contract for construction of Filter Blankets, Access Road, and Repairing Slides, Senecaville Lake, Ohio was awarded in September 1981, no work was initiated. The full funding estimate for Major Rehabilitation is $78,800,000 Operations and maintenance, general: The reservoirs were operated for flood control as required, and the necessary repairs were made to the structures and appurtenances. The system prevented an estimated $58,514,000 in flood damages during the fiscal year. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the system of projects was initiated in January 1935 and completed in November 1938. To date the system has prevented and estimated $887,603,000 in flood damages. 27. NORTH BRANCH OF KOKOSING RIVER LAKE, OHIO Location. The damsite is located in Knox County, on the North Branch of Kokosing River, approximately nine miles above the confluence of the Kokosing and North Branch Rivers, and 22 miles northwest of Fredericktown, Ohio. Existing project. The existing projects consists of a rolled-earth dam, 70 feet in height and 1,400 feet in length, and an uncontrolled spillway adjacent to the right abutment. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 14,885 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of 45 square miles. The reservoir is operated for protection of Fredericktown and Mount Vernon, Ohio valley of North Branch and Kokosing Rivers, and to lesser degree, the Muskingum and Ohio River Valleys. The existing project was selected for construction under the general authorization for the Ohio River Basin in the 1962 Flood Control Act. The Federal cost for new work is $6,266,186 which, includes expenditures for recreation under the completed projects program. Local cooperation. No local cooperation is required. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: All construction is complete. Operation and Maintenance, general. Necessary repairs were made to the structures and appurtenances. 25-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 Condition at end of fiscal year. All major construction is complete. The 56 tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. 28. NORTH FORK OF POUND RIVER LAKE, VIRGINIA Location. The damsite is located in Wise County, Virginia, on the North Fork of Pound River, approximately one mile upstream from the confluence of the North and South Forks which form the Pound River. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rockfill dam, with a height of 130 feet and length of 600 feet, an uncontrolled spillway in a saddle upstream from the dam, and an outlet tunnel in the right abutment with a control structure at the upstream end. The reservoir provides a total storage of 11,300 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of 18 square miles. The existing project was authorized under the 1960 Flood Control Act. The Federal cost of the project was $6,186,901 including expenditures for recreation under the completed projects program. Local cooperation. No local cooperation is required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance, general: The reservoir was operated for flood control, as required, and the necessary repairs were made to the structures and appurtenances. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project, which was initiated in March 1963, is complete. The 127 tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. To date the project has prevented an estimated $1,600,000 in flood damages. 29. OHIO RIVER BASIN (HUNTINGTON DISTRICT) Location. The work covered by this project consists of a series of leves, floodwalls, channel improvements, and dams and lakes in the Ohio River Basin within the Huntington District. Existing project. The existing project consists of the individual projects considered in the comprehensive plan within the Huntington District. See Table 25-D for local protection projects, Table 25-E for dam and lakes, and Table 25-F for authorizing legislation. Operations and results during fiscal year. The completed local protection projects, operated and maintained by local interest, other than those for which individual reports have been included, prevented flood damages of an estimated aggregate total of $2,468,000. 30. PAINT CREEK LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OHIO Location. The damsite is located in Ross County, on Paint Creek, a tributary of the Scioto River, 37 miles above the mouth of Paint Creek and 100 miles above the mouth of the Scioto River. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rock and random fill dam with a maximum height of 118 feet and a length of 700 feet, a gate controlled spillway located near the right abutment, an outlet tunnel located in the right abutment with a control structure at the upstream end, and a random rockfill dike located at the right abutment of the spillway. The reservoir is operated as a unit of the coordinated reservoir system for the protection of Chillicothe, Ohio, the Paint Creek Basin, and the Scioto and Ohio River Valleys, generally. The project was selected for construction under the general authorization for the Ohio River Basin in the 1938 Flood Control Act. The Federal cost of the project was 26,961,669 which includes expenditures for recreation under the completed projects program. Local cooperation. Local interests are required to operate and maintain fish and wildlife facilities. The State of Ohio in FY 1976 began to operate and maintain the recreation area. Operation and results during fiscal year. New work: All major construction is complete. Operation and maintenance, general: The reservoir was operated for flood control, as required, and the necessary repairs were made to the structures and appurtenances. The project prevented an estimated $28,000 in flood damages during the fiscal year. Condition at end offiscal year. The 257 tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. All major construction work is complete. To date the project has prevented an estimated $32,913,000 in flood damages. 31. PAINTSVILLE LAKE, KENTUCKY Location. The damsite is located in Johnson County, on Paint Creek, a tributary of Levisa Fork 25-12 HUNTINGTON. W.VA., DISTRICT of the Big Sandy River, eight miles above the mouth of Paint Creek, and four miles west of Paintsville. Existing project. The existing project provides for the construction of a rockfill dam 153 feet in height and 1,560 feet in length, an uncontrolled spillway located southwest of the right abutment, and an outlet tunnel in the right abutment with a control structure at the upstream end. The reservoir will provide a total storage of 76,642 acre-feet and control a drainage area of 93 square miles. The reservoir will be operated as a unit of the coordinated reservoir system for the protection of the Town of Paintsville, the lower Paint Creek Valley and Levisa Fork, Big Sandy and Ohio River Valleys, generally. The full funding estimate for new work is $61,000,000 which is to be appropriated and expended by the Federal Government. The sponsor will reimburse the Government $3,250,000 for the cost sharing portion of recreation development. The project was authorized by the 1965 Flood Control Act (House Document 146, 89th Congress). Local cooperation. Local interests are required to contribute 50% of the recreation costs under the current policy of Public Law 89-72. The recreation cost sharing contract has been signed by officials of the Commonwealth of Kentucky and by the Secretary of the Army. Assurances required by Section 221 of Public Law 91-611 were provided by the Commonwealth of Kentucky and approved by the Government in February 1973. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: The contract for relocating Kentucky State Route 437 was awarded in May 1980 and is complete. The contract for Cemetery Removal (Part V), Fencing Cemeteries and Landscaping was awarded in September 1981,40 work was initiated. During the fiscal year 62 tracts of land were acquired. While the project is not complete, involuntary storage prevented an estimated $22,000 in flood damages. Condition at end of fiscal year. New work: Contracts for road locations, alterations, and adjustment have been executed with the Commonwealth of Kentucky, Johnson County and Morgan County. Thus far, 573 of the 635 surface tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. To date involuntary impoundments have prevented an estimated $3,874,000 in flood damages. 32. R.D. BAILEY LAKE, WEST VIRGINIA Location. The damsite is located in Wyoming County, on the Guyandot River approximately 108 miles above the confluence with the Ohio River and about one mile east of Justice, West Virginia. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rolled-rockfill dam with a concrete face having a height of 305 feet and a length of 1,330 feet, an uncontrolled spillway located in a saddle in the right abutment, and an outlet tunnel in the left abutment with a control structure located at the upstream end. The reservoir provides a total storage of 203,700 acre-feet and controls a drainage are of 540 square miles. The reservoir operates as a unit of the coordinated system for the protection of Logan, West Virginia, and the Guyandot and Ohio River Valleys, generally. The existing project was selected for construction under the general authorization for the Ohio River Basin in the 1962 Flood Control Act. The full funding estimate for new work is $193,000,000. Local cooperation. No local cooperation is required. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: The contract for construction of Recreation Facilities was awarded in September 1981, no work was initiated. Engineering studies for the remaining activiteis continued. The project was dedicated during August 1980. During the fiscal year the project prevented an estimated $219,000 in flood damages. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction is well underway. The major part of the relocations work is complete and the outlet works, abutment excavation and road work are complete and the dam is complete. Thus far, 1,586 of the surface tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. To date the project has prevented an estimated $27,966,000 in flood damages. 33. SUMMERSVILLE LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, WEST VIRGINIA Location. The damsite is located at Ruckers Bend in Nicholas County on the Gauley River approximately 35 miles above the confluence of the Gauley and New Rivers at Gauley Bridge, West Virginia. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rockfill dam with a height of 357 feet and a length of 2,280 feet, an outlet tunnel in the right abutment with a control structure at the downstream end, an uncontrolled spillway located west of the right abutment, and two earthfill dikes. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 413,800 acre-feet and 25-13 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 controls a drainage area of 803 square miles. The existing project was selected for construction under the general authorization for the Ohio River Basin in the 1938 Flood Control Act. The Federal cost for new work was $48,257,517 which includes expenditures for recreation under the completed projects program. Local cooperation. No local cooperation is required. Operations and results during period. Operations and Maintenance, general: The reservoir was operated for flood control, as required, and necessary repairs were made to the structures and appurtenances. The contract for construction of a Comfort Station and upgrading the Sewer System, under the recreation at completed projects program, was awarded in June 1981 and is 47% complete. 34. SUTTON LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, WEST VIRGINIA Location. The damsite is located on the Elk River, in Braxton County approximately one mile above Sutton and 101 miles above the mouth of the Elk River. Existing project. The existing project consists of a concrete gravity dam having a height of 220 feet and a length of 1,178 feet, a gated spillway in the channel section of the dam, comprised of six tainter gates supported by piers, an outlet works comprised of five gates sluices through the spillway section. The reservoir provides for a storage of 265,300 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of 537 square miles. The existing project was selected for construction under the general authorization for the Ohio River Basin in the 1938 Flood Control Act. The Federal cost for new work was $38,839,961 which includes expenditures for recreation under the completed projects program. Local cooperation. No local cooperation is required. Under terms of an existing agreement, the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company paid $62,800 toward the relocation of a modified slope and other betterments. Operations and results during the fiscal year. Operations and maintenance, general: The reservoir was operated for flood control as required, and necessary repairs were made to the structures and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project prevented an estimated $7,000 in flood damages. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project initiated in October 1949, is complete. The 618 tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. To date the project has prevented an estimated $135,217,000 in flood damages. 35. TOM JENKINS RESERVOIR OHIO RIVER BASIN, OHIO Location. The damsite is located in Athens County, on the East Branch of Sunday Creek, a tributary of the Hocking River, approximately three miles north of Glouster, Ohio and 57 miles above the mouth of the Hocking River. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rolled-earthfill dam, 84 feet in height and 944 feet in length; a controlled outlet works discharging through a tunnel in the left abutment; and an uncontrolled spillway in the ridge running south from the damsite. The existing project was authorized under authority of the 1944 Flood Control Act. The Federal cost of completed work was $2,086,100. Local cooperation. All requirements of local cooperation have been met, see also page 1165 of the 1962 Annual Report. Contributed funds totaling $64,660 have been received from the State of Ohio. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: The reservoir was operated for flood control, as required, and necessary repairs were made to the structures and appurtenances. This project prevented an estimated $231,000 in flood damages during the fiscal year. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project was initiated in March 1948 and completed in February 1950. The reservoir provides substantial protection to Sunday Creek Valley as well as serving as a unit of the coordinated reservoir system for the protection of the Hocking and Ohio River Valleys. The reservoir also provides an assured source of water supply to villages, industries, and coal mining operations in the Sunday Creek Valley. To date the project has prevented an estimated $8,559,000 in flood damages. 36. YATESVILLE LAKE, KENTUCKY Location. The damsite is located in Lawrence County, Kentucky, on Blaine Creek, a tributary of the Big Sandy River, approximately five miles west of Louisa, Kentucky, and 18.5 miles above the mouth of Blaine Creek. 25-14 *HUNTINGTON. W.VA., DISTRICT Existingproject. The existing project provides for construction of an earthfill dam, 104 feet in height and 770 feet in length; and uncontrolled spillway located approximately one-half mile east of the right abutment; and an outlet tunnel through the left abutment of the dam with a control structure at the upstream end. The reservoir will provide a total storage of 86,951 acre-feet and control a drainage area of 208 square miles. The reservoir will be operated as a unit of the coordinated reservoir system for the protection of the Ohio River Valley. The total estimated cost for new work (1981) is $81,000,000 which is to be allocated and expended by the Government. The sponsor will reimburse the Government $5,175,000 for the cost sharing portion of initial recreation development. The project was authorized by the 1965 Flood Control Act (House Document 246, 89th Congress). Local cooperation. Local interests are required to contribute that portion of recreation costs which exceed the amount permitted to be borne by the Federal Government under Public Law 89-72. Operations and results during fiscal year. The contract for Cemetery Cite Preparation and Roadwork was awarded in August 1981 and is 5% complete. Condition at end of fiscal year. Enginering studies and Real Estate planning continued. 37. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS The Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936 and subsequent acts require local interests to furnish assurances that they will operate and maintain certain local protection projects after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army. District Engineers are responsible for the administration of these regulations within their respective districts. Maintenance inspections were made during the fiscal year of completed units transferred to local interests for operation and maintenance. Local interests were advised, as necessary, of measures required to maintain the projects in accordance with the standards prescribed by regulations. Total cost for fiscal year 1981 were $67,986. Total costs to September 30, 1981 were $859,349. (See Table 25-H on inspection of flood control projects.) 38. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See Table 25-1 for listing of all projects not covered in text. 39. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION For flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 853, 80th Congress, as amended (Preauthorization). See Table 25-J. For snagging and clearing of navigable streams and tributaries in the interest of flood control pursuant to Section 208 of the 1954 Flood Control Act, Public Law 780, 83rd Congress. See Table 25-J. For emergency bank protection pursuant to Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 256, 79th Congress. See Table 25-J For stream erosion control, evaluation and demonstration pursuant to Section 32 of the 1974 Water Resources Development Act, Public Law 251, 93rd Congress. See Table 25-J Flood control and coastal emergency activities, Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation. Costs for disaster preparedness were $67,003 during fiscal year 1981. 40. SURVEYS Fiscal year 1981 costs were $2,639,999 itemized as follows: Navigation Studies ................ $487,452 Flood Damage Prevention Studies .. 1,030,097 Comprehensive Basin Studies ........ $428,997 Review of Authorized Projects ............. 0 Coordination Studies .............. $199,160 Supplemental Pre-Authorization ..... $494,293 41. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Fiscal year 1981 costs were $198,750. 42. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT During FY 1981 no funds were expended for Research and Development. 25-15 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 25-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Totals to In Test Project Funding FY78 FY79 FY80 FY 81 30 Sept. 81 2 Kanawha River, W.Va. 5. Chillicothe, Ohio 6. Levisa and Tug Forks of the Big Sandy River and Cumberland River, Ky., W.Va., and Va. 7. Martin, Ky. 8. Massillon, Ohio 9. Newark, Ohio 10. Oceana, W.Va. 11. Roseville, Ohio 12. Alum Creek Lake, Ohio 13. Beech Fork Lake, W.Va. New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 45,000 36,203 2,684,117 3,680,475 2,511,273 4,328,000 2,860,975 3,304,675 2,551,386 4,195,100 2,400,000 2,304,000 2,288,025 2,288,025 434,000 7,550,000 362,619 7,637,269 4,000,000 3,001,393 0 1,355 9,862 13,362 -50,000 94,893 13,149 12,999 -24,000 3,547 10,000 0 -30,000 103,753 10,000 191 155,000 280,000 137,804 296,768 6,989 10,034 3,125,000 2,711,811 215,236 223,618 1,325,000 1,242,735 302,372 296,049 5,000 4,970 492,101 1,259,465 273,612 263,945 983,000 1,015,287 350,785 343,891 -2,900 3,911 10,924 20,922 381,700 320,167 9,516 19,475 0 580 9,000 8,997 2,820,000 2,712,807 14,000 14,000 280,000 -90,000 175,730 301 9,560 10,000 9,560 10,000 1,470,000 1,453,947 270,715 275,565 825,000 1,001,244 438,556 435,941 1,870,000 1,946,955 404,000 380,678 880,000 755,144 502,500 498,904 27,212,382' 27,203,5852 45,103,5843 44,416,8083 130,3944 130,3944 14,454,099 14,423,948 4,000,000 3,001,393 213,400 210,879 8,139,4065 8,139,4065 222,508 222,503 3,989,375 3,813,019 619,765 619,765 625,000 610,602 910,785 910,785 100,968 100,968 54,038,064 53,864,501 1,743,065 1,713,506 35,746,500 35,474,459 1,832,039 1,810,151 25-16 HUNTINGTON, W.VA., DISTRICT TABLE 25-A (CONT'D) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Totals to In Test Project Funding FY78 FY79 FY80 FY81 30 Sept. 81 14. Bluestone Lake, Ohio River Basin, W. Va. 15. Burnsville Lake, Ohio River Basin, W.Va. 16. Deer Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, Ohio 17. Delaware Lake, Ohio River Basin, Ohio 18. Dewey Lake, Ohio River Basin Ohio 19. Dillon Lake, Ohio River Basin, Ohio 20. East Lynn Lake, Ohio River Basin, W.Va. 21. Fishtrap Lake, Ohio River Basin. Ky. 22. Grayson Lake, Ky. New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 35,000 121 481,896 430,111 5,350,00 5,136,530 298,662 297.091 25,000 46,667 396,709 441,164 3,525,000 4,483,202 332,108 327,116 -5,458 10,00 0 5,871 345,003 390,863 351,676 354,549 287,471 222,262 272,687 231,466 74,250 17,042 742,904 742,392 -67,700 3,059 637,573 634,470 212,645 277.122 205,461 273,845 300,000 5,018.924 606,015 420.405 53,871 236,910 735,869 729.638 598,215 3.579 433,876 427.919 125,752 177,321 547.858 604,749 185,000 246.3 15 783,488 720,341 -435,000 36.930 506.527 500,538 120,000 72,194 487,618 586,224 540,000 683,890 453,119 421,624 664 4,793 389,802 418,619 -803 100,772 645,000 630,392 760,000 639,185 523,200 532,657 00 373,000 365,310 288,348 307,000 290,102 284,545 -2,020 0 566,916 575,444 0 0 542,000 526,423 187,556 209,000 190,062 214,476 1,764,000 1,356,942 545,645 472,963 -2,384 6,409 045,198 1,020,942 336,473 45,458 513,303 523,570 700,000 852,489 677,000 653,167 0 4,652 573,000 574,633 -125,394 249,041 604,500 568,937 25-17 29,468,1126 29,457,6037 7,460,078 7,411,865 44,495,266 44,159,089 1,874,505 1,844,986 20,406,5458 20,406,5458 3,271,364 3,247,096 7,631,821 7,631,821 3,410,719 3,379,149 7,845,5469 7,845,5469 6,940,076 6,892,793 30,218,135 30,218,135 2,495,843 2,491,047 34,825,968 34,392,546 4,558,389 4,526,727 54,566,09410 54,566,09410 1,618,198 1,599,512 19,155,59911 19,087,17312 4,640,670 4,599,450 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 25-A (CONT'D) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Totals to In Test Project Funding FY78 FY79 FY80 FY81 30 Sept. 81 23. John W. Flannagan, Dam and Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, Va. 24. Kehoe Lake, Ky. 25. Mill Creek Lake, Ohio 26. Muskingum River, Dam and Lakes, Ohio 27. North Branch of Kokosing River Lake, Ohio 28. North Fork of Pound River Lake, Ohio River Basin, Va. 29. Ohio River Basin 30. Paint Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, Ohio 31. Paintsville Lake, Ky. 32. R.D. Bailey Lake, W.Va. New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work 6 Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost -1.021 29 496,342 516,020 0 2,435 750 717 2,139,613 2,192,688 1,185,000 1,089,337 24,610 70,976 105.341 84,790) -10,000 0 484,952 478,901 00 452,167 463,082 00 585,000 555,538 -752 9,161 10,000 9,777 2,186,361 2,103,898 2,075,000 1,697,422 -101 0 143,173 164,303 283,152 392,456 291,346 347,958 0 -4,49.8 258.217 259.779 -3,700 7.804 351,634 323.343 6,832.524 9,123,000 7.015,991 8,870()022 8,000,000 1 0.452.557 214,588 214,458 14.708.000 16,502,356 286,203 283,851 5,384 10,639 3.263,068 3,024,326 2,200,000 2,204,626 49.000 17,470 60,823 62,770 286,189 335,094 9,153 20,889 353.184 365,410 0 8,413 3,321,000 3,245,321 3,730,000 3,611,151 - 3,823 27,707 119,500 105,526 20,311,59813 20,311,59813 5,545,652 5,507,304 1,272,740 1,272,740 1,602,702 1,602,702 41,250,39414 41,246,016' 5 36,220,770 35,782,725 10,211,94516 9,379,29016 6,266,18617 6,266,186' 7 831,017 813,409 6,186,90118 6,186,90118 333,000 3,484,159 325,340 3,472,740 0 - 5,939 455,000 432,816 7,298,000 4,850,000 7,655.776 5,341,654 143,000 139,639 4.871,000 5,101,980) 372,131 359.095 2,700,000 2,816,128 594,000 564,155 26,985,55320 26,961,66920 2,375,760 2,336,712 41,906,788 41,723,595 143,000 139,639 179,622,23421 179,061,64021 1,554,814 1,508,784 25-18 355,86119 355,86119 HUNTINGTON, W. VA., DISTRICT TABLE 25-A (CONT'D) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Totals to In Test Project Funding FY78 FY79 FY80 FY81 30 Sept. 81 33. Summersville Lake, New Work W.Va. Approp. 0 290,000 -30,000 0 48,335,85322 Cost 0 14.638 42,441 124,585 48,257,51723 Maint. Approp. 550,735 739,609 520,409 923,000 6,434,502 Cost 543,453 696,451 565,337 824,423 6,313,744 34. Sutton Lake, New Work W. Va. Approp. 38,839,96124 Cost 38,839,96124 Maint Approp. 736,153 1,180,920 2,484,929 835,000 11,118,853 Cost 734,0 12 1,131,664 2,503,800 800,472 11,037,527 35. Tom Jenkins Dam, New Work Ohio River Basin, Approp. 2,124,56725 Ohio Cost 2,124,56725 Maint. Approp. 134,887 145,645 172,506 259,200 2,299,475 Cost 134,814 142,663 178.076 184,738 2,224,420 36. Yatesville Lake, New Work Ky. Approp. 340.000 -115,000 50,000 800,000 12,044,500 Cost 1,190.210 104,878 100,015 603,357 11,784,532 1. Includes $4,294,612 for new work for previous projects, $4,498,636 emergency relief funds, $9,004,800 public works funds and $45,000 Code 713 funds. 2. Includes $4,294,612 for new work for previous projects. $4,498,636 emergency relief funds, $9,004,800 public works funds and $36,203 Code 713 funds. 3. Includes $3,883,513 for maintenance of previous projects. 4. Public works acceleration funds. 5. Includes $477,813 contributed funds. 6. Includes $543,960 emergency relief funds, $9,698 public works acceleration funds, $221,310 Code 711 funds and $75.000 Code 713 funds. 7. Includes $543,960 emergency relief funds. 9.698 public works acceleration funds, $211,850 Code 711 funds and $73.951 Code 713 funds. 8. Excludes $225,090 contributed funds, Includes $590,69() Code 711 funds. 9. Includes $23,087 public works acceleration funds, $1,089,940 Code 711 funds and $231,105 Code 713 funds. 10. Includes $258,616 Code 711 funds and $10,000 Code 712 funds. 11. Includes $397,459 Code 711 funds and $4.634 Code 713 funds. 12. Includes $331,350 Code 711 funds and $2,317 Code 713 funds. 13. Includes $290,198 Code 711 funds. 14. Includes $27,190,000 National Industrial Recovcry Funds and $531,466 Code 711 funds. 15. Includes $27,190,000 National Industrial Recovery Funds and $527,087 Code 711 funds. 16. Includes $61,945 Public Works Acceleration funds. 17. Includes $45,177 Code 711 funds. 18. Includes $64,233 Code 711 funds. 19. Includes $10,920 Emergency Relief funds. 20. Includes $14,153 Code 711 funds. 21. Includes $5,534 Consolidated Army funds. 22. Includes $260,000 Code 711 funds. 23. Includes $181,664 Code 711 funds. 24. Includes $1,647,713 Code 711 funds and $287,843 Accelerated Public Works Funds. 25. Includes $8,064 Code 711 funds and $30,000 Public Works Acceleration funds, excludes $639,660 contributed funds. 25-19 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 KANAWHA RIVER, W. VA.: TOTAL COST OF EXISTING PROJECT TO SEPTEMBER 30, 1981 TABLE 25-B (See Section 2 of Text) Operations & Maintenance, Project New Work General Rehabilitation Total Regular $ 9,405,5371 3 4 $40,533,295 $49,938,832 Public $9,004,800 $9,004,800 Emergency Relief $4,498,636 $4,498,636 Public Works $130,394 $130,394 Acceleration, Executive, 1963 Total $22,908,9732 $40,533,295 $130,394 $63,572,662 1. $5,159,879 expended between July 1884 and June 30, 1936, on 2. Excludes $3,883,513 expended for maintenance on previous operation and care of work improvement under provisions of per- projects. manent indefinite appropriations for such purposes, of which $1,- 3. Includes $36,203 Code 713 funds. 276,366 expended on existing project. 4. Excludes $4,294,612 expended for new work on previous projects. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS TABLE 25-C (See Section 4 of Text) Cost to Sept. 30, 1981 For last Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report for Construction Maintenance Big Sandy River, W. Va., and Ky., Including Levisa and Tug Forks. 1952 1,586,236 1,471,299' Elk River, W. Va.3 1903 30,259 Gauley River, W. Va.4 1903 14,761 Guyandotte River, W. Va. s 1915 27,500 Little Kanawha River., 6 1960 470,536 1,023,854 Muskingum River, Ohio? 1955 301,912 6,171,897' New River, Va. and W. Va.s 1899 109,691 Scioto River at Portsmouth, Ohio9 1953 10,951 16,593 1. Excludes $131,473 contributed by local interest for maintenance of lock 1 in fiscal years 1953-62, inclusive, in addition $98,512 expended from operation and maintenance funds for repair of lock and dam 3 for local water supply and recreation. In addition, $140,068 expended from funds transferred from Department of Commerce, under accelerated public works program, for repairs of eroded bank at lock 3 on Big Sandy River, at Louisa, Ky. 2. Operation and Maintenance suspended June 30, 1952. 3. Work closed September 1902. Property transferred to Kanawha River improvements. 4. Work closed September 1902. Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th Congress. 5. Work suspended. 6. Operation and maintenance suspended June 30, 1951. 7. Collections from license non-Federal hydroelectric utilities for use of dams on Muskingum River for fiscal years 1923-1953 were $79,154. 8. Excludes $5,663 and $378, respectively, contributed funds for reconstruction of dam 10, and intermittent operation of lock 1 for benefit of Marietta Boat Club, Inc., subsequent to June 30, 1954. 9. Private Law 954, August 31, 1954, authorized Secretary of Treasury to pay Portsmouth sand and Gravel Co. $75,000 in full settlement of claims against Government for damages resulting from change in Scioto River Channel. 25-20 TABLE 25-D HUNTINGTON. W.VA., DISTRICT OHIO RIVER BASIN HUNTINGTON DISTRICT LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS (Section 29 of Text) Estimated Cost3 Type of Location' 2 Protection Federal Non-Federal Total Aberdeen, Ohio Ashland, Ky. Athalia, Ohio'3 Augusta, Ky. Belpre, Ohio'4 Brooklyn, W. Va. 16 Buena Vista, Ohio'3 Burlington, Ohio Catlettsburg, Ky. Ceredo-Kenova, W. Va. Chambersburg, Ohio Chesapeake, Ohio Cheshire, Ohio14 Chilo, Ohio'3 Clifton, W. Va.'3 Coal Grove, Ohio Columbus, Ohio Dover, Ky. Friendly, W. Va.13 Fullerton, Ky. Galax (New River Basin), Va. Gallipolis, Ohio'3 Greenup, Ky. Hanging Rock, Ohio13 Hartford, W. Va.13 Henderson, W. Va.' 3 Higginsport, Ohio's Hockingport, Ohio'3 Huntington, W. Va. Ironton, Ohio Letart, W. Va.'3 Letart Falls, Ohio'3 Manchester, Ohio Mapleshade, Ohio's Marietta, Ohio Mason, W. Va.'3 Massillon (Muskingum River Basin), Ohios Maysville, Ky. Middleport, Ohio Miller, Ohio'3 Millwood, W. Va.13 Newark (Muskingum River Basin), Ohios New Martinsville, W. Va.'6 New Matamoras,Ohio 3 Newport, Ohio13 Normal, Ky. Parkersburg, W. Va. Point Pleasant, W. Va. Pomeroy, Ohio'3 Portland, Ohio'3 Portsmouth-New Boston, Ohio Proctorville, Ohio Racine, Ohio'3 Ravenswood, W. Va. Ripley,Ohio' Riverview, W. Va.' 3 Roseville (Muskingum River Basin), Ohio5 Wall and levee Wall and levee Levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Levee Levee Wall and levee Levee Wall and levee Channel improvement Levee Wall and levee wall and levee Channel improvement and levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Levee Wall and levee Levee Wall and levee Levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Levee Levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Channel improvement Wall and levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Levee Wall and levee Channel improvement and levee Channel improvement and levee Wall and levee Levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Resettlement Wall and levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Levee Channel improvement $ 1,430,000 3,718,839 630,000 1,220,000 3,570,000 5,200,000 593,000 146,000 3,854,361 2,756,956 1,600,000 330,000 419,000 899,000 230,000 888,000 475,000 648,000 655,000 1,090,000 480,536 2,670,000 2,660,000 467,000 2,880,000 437,000 944,000 568,000 7,172,840 2,628,006 938,000 992,000 1,330,000 1,330,000 14,000,000 1,040,000 8,139,406 6,493,747 6,260,000 519,000 843,000 3,615,916 4,670,000 2,090,000 318,000 648,000 6,652,827 2,918,780 16,500,000 1,040,000 9,806,424 2,700,000 985,000 1,470,000 1,940,000 881,000 910,785 $ 55,000 313,000 187,000 620,000 448,000 226,000 197,000 117,000 300,000 265,000 53,000 139,000 147,000 120,000 113,000 55,000 135,000 585,000 61,000 178,000 185,000 839,000 512,000 155,000 222,000 188,000 320,000 242,000 1,509,0006 669,000 123,000 126,000 377,000 298,000 822,000 238,000 477,8137 563,7008 490,000 173,000 134,000 541,000 643,000 285,000 84,000 235,000 300,000 278,000 346,000 104,000 525,00012 120,000 106,000 810,000 115,000 62,000 $ 1,485,000 4,031,8394 817,00 1,840,000 4,018,000 5,426,000 790,000 263,000 4,154,3614 3,021,9564 1,653,000 469,000 566,000 1,019,000 343,000 943,000 610,000 1,233,000 716,000 1,268,000 66,5364 3,509,000 3,172,000 622,000 3,102,000 625,000 1,264,000 810,000 8,682,1404 3,297,0064 1,061,000 1,118,000 1,707,000 1,628,000 14,822,000 1,278,000 8,617,2194 7,057,4474 6,750,0009 692,000 977,000 4,156,9164 o0 5,313,000 2,375,000 402,000 883,000 6,952,8274 3,196,7804 16,846,000 1,144,000 10,331,4244 2,700,000 1,105,000 1,576,000 2,750,000 996,000 972,7854 '" 25-21 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 OHIO RIVER BASIN HUNTINGTON DISTRICT LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS TABLE 25-D Cont'd (Section 29 of Text) Type of Estimated Cost3 Location' 2 Protection Federal Non-Federal Total Sistersville, W.Va'3 Wall and levee 1,770,000 269,000 2,039,000 South Point, Ohio Wall and levee 992,000 117,000 1,109,000 South Portsmouth, Ky. Levee 370,000 137,000 507,000 Syracuse, Ohio'3 Levee 1,220,000 100,000 1,320,000 Vanceburg, Ky. Wall and levee 2,490,000 685,000 3,175,0009 Waverly, W.Va. 13 Wall and levee 3,480,000 251,000 3,731,000 Williamstown, W.Va.16 Wall and levee 2,580,000 136,000 2,716,000 Zanesville (Muskingum River),Ohio Wall and levee 8,110,000 13,000,000 21,110,000 1. All projects are Ohio River, unless otherwise noted. 2. Also see "Other authorized flood control projects," for all projects except: Massillon, Newark, and Roseville, Ohio. 3. Latest cost estimate revised 1954, unless otherwise noted. 4. Construction completed. 5. For details see individual report. 6. Includes $2,300 construction funds contributed by local interests. 7. Construction funds contributed by Massillon Conservancy District. 8. Includes $38,700 construction funds contributed by local interests. 9. Latest cost estimate revised, 1960. 10. Includes construction costs expended in fiscal year 1963 and 1964 on original project. 11. Includes estimate for modified project. 12. Includes $15,150 construction funds contributed by local interests. 13. Projects Deauthorized in FY 1977. 14. Projects Deauthorized in FY 1978. 15. Projects Deauthorized in FY 1979. 16. Projects Deauthorized in FY 1980. 25-22 HUNTINGTON. W.VA., DISTRICT OHIO RIVER BASIN (HUNTINGTON DISTRICT) DAMS AND LAKES TABLE 25-E (Section 29 of Text) Tributary basin Total estimated and reservoir Stream Cost Big Sandy: Dewey, Ky2 Fishtrap, Ky2 Haysi, Va. s John W. Flannagan, Va. Guyandotte: Mud River, W. Va. s 16 Hocking: Logan, Ohio s Tom Jenkins, Ohio2 Kanawha: Big Bend, W. Va.s 13 Birch, W. Va. s Bluestone, W. Va.2 Clendenin, W. Va.13 Moores Ferry, Va. s Poca, W. Va. s Summersville, W. Va. 2 Sutton, W. Va.2 Little Kanawha: Burnsville, W. Va. 2 Leading Creek, W. Va.s I" West Fork, W. Va. s 11 Muskingum: Dillon, Ohio2 Frazeysburg, Ohios Millersburg, Ohios Muskingum River Lakes (System of 14 reservoirs)2 Scioto: Big Darby Creek, Ohio'6 Big Walnut, Ohio'4 Deer Creek, Ohio2 Delaware, Ohio2 Paint Creek, Ohio2 Rocky Fork, Ohio'3 Twelvepole Creek:2 East Lynn, W. Va. Johns Creek Levisa Fork Russell Fork Pound River Mud River Clear Creek East Branch of Sunday Creek Greenbrier River Birch River New River Elk River New River Pocatalico River Gauley River Elk River Little Kanawha River Leading Creek West Fork Licking River Wakatomika Creek Killbuck Creek On various streams Big Darby Creek Big Walnut Creek Deer Creek Olentangy River Paint Creek Rock Fork East Fork Latest cost estimated revision 1954, unless otherwise noted. For details see individual report. Construction completed. Latest cost estimate revision 1978. Also see "Other Authorized Flood Control Projects." Excludes $785,000 contributed by local interests. Latest cost estimate revision 1960. Latest cost estimate revision 1963. See annual report for 1950 for individual report. 10. Total cost $6,349,000, additional $1,939,000 to be contributed by local interests. 11. See Annual Report for 1974 for individual report. 12. Latest cost estimate revision 1974. 13. Replaced by Sutton Lake. 14. Built by City of Columbus, Ohio (Hoover). 15. Projects Deauthorized in FY 1977. 16. Projects Deauthorized in FY 1980. 25-23 $ 7,845,5003 54,297,5003 10,100,000 20,021,4003 10,600,000 4,230,000 2,086,5003 6 13,900,000 6,450,000 28,618,4003 13,000,000 25,600,000 21,600,000 48,075,9003 36,904,4003 55,300,0004 40,400,00012 39,700,00012 30,218,100; 7,200,0007 12,000,000 40,718,9003 70,300,000' 19,815,9003 7,631,8003 26,971,4003 4,410,000"o 34,826,000 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 25-F AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Aug. 28,1937 June 28, 1938 Aug. 11, 1939 Aug. 18, 1941 Dec. 22, 1944 July 24, 1946 May 17, 1950 Dec. 80, 1963 June 18, Aug. 18, June 19, 1965 1968 1970 March 7, 1974 OHIO RIVER BASIN-HUNTINGTON DISTRICT (See Section 28 of Text) Construct levees, floodwalls, and drainage structures for protection of cities and towns in Ohio River Basin. Projects to be selected by Chief of Engineers with approval of Secretary of Army at a cost not to exceed $24,877,000 for construction. Approved general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in Ohio River Basin as may be advisable in discretion of Secretary of Army and Chief of Engineers, and for initiation and partial accomplishment of plan, authorized $75 million for reservoirs and $50,300,000 for local flood protection works. Provides Muskingum River Valley dams and reservoirs as set forth in official plan of Muskingum watershed conservancy district shall be included in flood control plan of Ohio River Basin. Additional $45 million for prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Additional $70 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin, including Burr Oak Reservoir on Hocking River, Ohio at an estimated cost of $400,000. Additional $125 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan including local flood protection works at Galax, Va., on Chestnut Creek, at an estimated cost of $276,125. Additional $100 million for prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Additional $150 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in Ohio River Basin. Additional $89 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Additional $35 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Additional $69 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Additional $120 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Flood Control Committee Doec. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. Flood Control Committee Doec. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Seas. H. Doec. 762, 77th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 506, 78th Cong., 1st Seas. H. Doec. 6755, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. S. 8710, 90th Cong. H. Doc. 15166, 91st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doec. 10208, 93rd Cong., 2nd Ses. 25-24 HUNTINGTON. W.VA., DISTRICT TABLE 25-G OHIO RIVER BASIN (HUNTINGTON DISTRICT) PROJECT COSTS TO SEPT. 30, 1981 (See Section 29 of Text) New Work Total Total Cost Appropriated to to Sept. 30, 1981 Sept. 30, 1981 Local Protections projects: Aberdeen, Ohio $ 1,334 $ 1,334 Augusta, Ky. 11,5771 11,577' Coal Grove, Ohio 3,389 3,389 Columbus, Ohio6 11,2372 11,2372 Greenup, Ky. 4,962 4,962 Manchester, Ohio 17,721' 17,721' Middleport, Ohio 9,7833 9,7833 Ripley, Ohio 7,523 7,523 Reservoirs and Lakes: Big Walnut, Ohio 110,622 110,622 Birch, W.Va. 45,736' 45,736' Clendenin, W.Va. 33,000 33,000 Frazeysburg, Ohio 5,000 5,000 Haysi, Va. 2,656 2,656 Leading Creek, W.Va. 272,880s 272,880 s Rocky Fork, Ohio6 91,321 91,321 West Fork, W.Va. 663,1925 663,1925 Total Ohio River Basin 1,291,9334 1,291,9334 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Allocation and costs for feasibility study. Includes $9,137 emergency relief funds. Includes $1,783 emergency relief funds. Includes $10,920 emergency relief funds (Basin total). Location and costs for Phase I GDM Draft. Projects Deauthorized in FY 1977. 25-25 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 INSPECTION OF FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS TABLE 25-H (See Section 37 of Text) Flood Control Works Inspected Dates of Inspection Ashland, KY May 81 Oct. 81 Athens, OH Oct. 80 Oct. 80 Catlettsburg, KY May. 81 Sep. 81 Ceredo-Kenova, WV May. 81 Sep. 81 Huntington, WV Sep. 81 Sep. 81 Ironton, OH Apr. 81 Oct. 81 Maysville, KY May. 81 Oct. 81 Newark, OH Aug. 81 Parkersbqrg, WV Sep. 81 Sep. 81 Point Pleasant, WV Sep. 81 Sep. 81 Portsmouth-New Boston, OH May. 81 Oct. 81 Prestonsburg, KY Jun. 81 Russell, KY May. 81 Oct. 81 South Williamson, KY Jun. 81 Oct. 81 Williamson, WV Jun. 81 Oct. 81 Bramwell, WV Aug. 81 Cairo, WV Aug 81 Canton (Nimishillen), OH Dec. 79 East Rainelle, WV Jul. 81 Fishing Creek, Pine Grove, WV Sep. 81 Four Pole Creek, WV Dec. 79 Galax, VA Aug. 81 Grahn, KY Aug. 81 Griffithsville-Yawkey, WV Dec. 79 Hitchins, KY Aug. 81 Inez, KY Sep. 80 Jacksonburg, Fishing Creek, WV Aug. 81 Montcalm, WV Aug. 81 Olive Hill, KY Aug. 81 Paint Creek at Chillicothe, OH Dec. 79 Paint Creek at Washington Court House, OH Jan. 80 Pax, WV Jul. 81 Princeton, WV Aug. 81 Right and Left Forks of Beaver Creek, KY Jan. 81 Richwood and Fenwick, WV Jul. 81 Ripley, WV Aug. 81 Roseville, OH Aug. 81 Russell, KY Sep. 80 Smithfield, WV Aug. 81 Utica, OH Aug 81 West Union, Middle Island, WV Aug. 81 25-26 HUNTINGTON. W.VA., DISTRICT OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS TABLE 25-I (All Projects not Specifically Identified in Text) For Last Cost to Sept. 30, 1981 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Local Protection projects: Aberdeen, Ohio - 1,334 Ashland, Ky.3 1954 3,718,8394 Athalia, Ohio s Athens, Ohio3 1979 5,313,700 Augusta, Ky.' - 11,577 Belpre, Ohio' Brooklyn, W.Va.' Buena Vista, Ohio s Burlington, Ohio' Catlettsburg, Ky.3 1963 3,854,361 Ceredo-Kenova, W.Va.3 1955 2,753,5514 Chamberburg, Ohio s Chesapeake, Ohio' Cheshire, Ohio' Chilo, Ohio s Clifton, W.Va. s Coal Grove, Ohio' - 3,389 Coal River, W.Va.' 1979 472,229 Columbus, Ohio s - 11,237 Dover, Ky.' East Rainelle, W.Va.3 1962 "614,598 Friendly, W.Va. s Fullerton, Ky.' Galax, Virginia3 1953 480,536 Gallipolis, Ohio s Greenup, Ky.' - 4,962 Hanging Rock, Ohios Hartford, W.Va. s Henderson, W.Va. 5 Higginsport, Ohio - - Hockingport, Ohio s Huntington, W.Va.3 1956 7,172,8404 Ironton, Ohio3 1952 2,604,6464 Letart, W.Va. s Letart Falls, Ohio s Lower Guyandotte River Basin, W.Va.' - 17,721 Manchester, Ohio' 1975 24,101 Mapleshade, Ohio7 Marietta, Ohio' Mason, W.Va. s 5 Maysville, Ky.3 1959 6,493,7474 Middleport, Ohio' - 9,783 Miller, Ohio s Milwood, W.Va. s New Martinsville, W.Va.' New Matamoras, Ohio s Newport, Ohios Normal, Ky.' Parkersburg, W.Va.3 1955 6,652,8274' Pt. Pleasant, W.Va.3 1953 2,919,5804' Pomeroy, Ohio s Portland, Ohio s 25-27 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (All Projects not Specifically Identified in Text) TABLE 25-I(Cont'd) For Last Cost to Sept. 30, 1981 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Portsmouth-New Boston, Ohio 3 1956 9,806,4244 Princeton, W.Va.3 1962 808,750 Proctorville, Ohio' Racine, Ohio5 Ravenswood, W.Va.' Ripley, Ohio' - 7,523 Riverview, W.Va.s Russell, Ky.3 1953 237,193 St. Mary's, W.Va.s Sardis, Ohios Sciotoville, Ohio s Sisterville, W.Va. s South Point, Ohio' South Portsmouth, Ky.' Syracuse, Ohio s Vanceburg, Ky.' Waverly, W.Va. s Williamson, W.Va.3 1964 1,056,166 Williamstown, W.Va.' Zanesville, Ohio' Reservoirs and Lakes: Big Bend, W.Va.s Big Darby, Ohio8 1969 3,349,568 Big Walnut, Ohio Birch, W.Va.2 - 45,736 Clendenin, W.Va. Frazeysburg, Ohio' - 5,000 Haysi, Va.' - 2,656 Leading Creek, W.Va.' 1974 272,880 Logan, Ohio2 Millersburg, Ohio' Moores Ferry, Va.2 Mud River, W.Va.' Panther Creek Lake, W.Va.' 1976 22,879 Poca, W.Va.' - - - Rocky Fork, Ohio5 1950 91,321 Salt Creek Lake, Ohio' 1975 1,089,943 Utica Lake, Ohio' 1975 663,192 West Fork, W.Va.' 1974 663,192 1. Inactive 2. Deferred 3. Completed 4. Includes cost of floodwall rehabilitation. 5. Projects Deauthorized in FY 1977. 6. Projects Deauthorized in FY 1978. 7. Projects Deauthorized in FY 1979. 8. Projects Deauthorized in FY 1980. 25-28 HUNTINGTON. W.VA., DISTRICT FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION TABLE 25-J (See Section 39 of Text) Flood Control activities pursuant to Section 205 P.L. 858, 80th Congress, as amended Study Identification FY81 Cost Apple Creek, Wooster, Ohio $ 6,053 Blacklick Creek, Reynoldsburg, Ohio 30,826 Laurel Fork, Matheny, W.Va. 16,656 Laurelville, Ohio 20,856 Sandy Creek, Malvern, Ohio 6,993 Snagging and clearing navigable streams and tributaries in the interest of flood control (Sec. 208, 1954 Flood Control Act, P.L. 780 83rd Congress) Project and Location Stinson Creek, Grayson, Ky. 16,319 Emergency Bank Protection (Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, P.L. 526, 79th Congress) Project and Location Kanawha River, Chesapeake, WV $ 4,796 Marrietta College Boathouse, Marietta, Ohio 3 Momument Landing, Marietta, Ohio 61,542 New Haven, W.Va. 40,532 Parkersburg, W.Va. 334 Scout Camp, Marietta, Ohio 6,959 Sistersville, W.Va. 17,680 Stream Erosion Control, Evaluation and Demonstration (Section 32 of the 1974 Water Resources Development Act, P.L. 251, 93rd Congress) Project Identification Demonstration Projects at Undersigned Sites $11,326 Ohio River Demonstration Projects 564,421 Evaluation of Extent of Streambank Erosion 2,175 25-29 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT* This District comprises part of eastern Ohio, western Penn- mediately upstream from New Martinsville, W. Va. sylvania, southwestern New York, northern West Virginia, and All cost and financial statements for projects are listed at the northwestern Maryland embraced in drainage basin of Ohio end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and River and tributaries above mile 127 (below Pittsburgh), im- also appear at the end of this chapter. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation - Locks and Dams Page 1. Allegheny River, Pa. ........................ 26-1 2. Construction of locks and dams, Ohio River ............................... 26-2 3. Monongahela River, Pa. and W. Va. .......... ... 26-2 4. Open-channel work, Ohio River .................. 26-2 5. Tygart Lake, W. Va ...................... .. 26-2 6. Other authorized navigation projects ............. 26-3 Flood Control - Local Protection 7. Chartiers Creek, Pa. ........................... 26-3 8. Elkins, W. Va. ................ ............ .. 26-3 9. Girty's Run, Millvale, Pa. ................... .26-4 10. Johnstown, Pa ............................ 26-4 11. Punxsutawney, Ohio River Basin, Pa .. .............................. 26-4 12. Root Creek, Bolivar, N.Y....................... 26-5 13. Tenmile Creek at Marianna, Pa. ............... 26-5 Flood Control - Reservoirs 14. Berlin Lake, Ohio River Basin, Ohio ................................ 26-5 15. Conemaugh River Lake, Ohio River Basin, Pa....................... 26-6 16. Crooked Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, Pa...........................26-6 17. East Branch, Clarion River Lake, Ohio River Basin, Pa .......................... 26-6 18. Kinzua Dam and Allegheny Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, Pa. and N.Y................... 26-7 Navigation - Locks and Dams 1. ALLEGHENY RIVER, PA. Location. The Allegheny River is 325 miles long. It rises in northern Pennsylvania, flows northwestward into New York, thence generally southwestward to Pittsburgh, Pa., where it joins with Monongahela River to form the Ohio. (See Geological Survey Charts for western Pennsylvania and southwestern New York.) Existing project. The project consists of eight locks and dams to afford slack-water navigation for a length of 72 miles from Pittsburgh, Pa. to above East Brady, Pa. Controlling depth through canalized portion is 9 feet at normal pool level. Channel width varies from a minimum of 200 feet to full width of river at mouth. (See Tables 26-A, 26-B and 26-C for costs, authorizing legislation and statistics.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Flood Control (Continued) Page 19. Loyalhanna Lake, Ohio River Basin, Ohio .... ...... ...... . . . . 26-7 20. Mahoning Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, Pa. .. . .. .. 26-7 21. Michael J. Kirwan Dam and Reservoir, Ohio ...................... . 26-8 22. Mosquito Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, Ohio ...................... .26-8 23. Ohio River Basin (Pittsburgh District) ..................... ..... . . 26-9 24. Shenango River Lake, Ohio River Basin, Pa. and Ohio .................... 26-9 25. Stonewall Jackson Lake, W. Va .... .... . .. 26-9 26. Tionesta Lake, Ohio River Basin, Pa. .... .................... 26-10 27. Union City Dam, Pa. .............. ...... 26-11 28. Woodcock Creek Lake, Pa... ...... .. ... .26-11 29. Youghiogheny River Lake, Ohio River Basin, Pa. and Md. .................. ..... 26-11 30. Inspection of completed flood control projects .......... ................... 26-12 31. Other authorized flood control projects ......... 26-12 32. Flood control work under special authorization ...................... 26-12 33. 34. 35. General Investigations Surveys .................. .. .. . Collection and study of basic data ........... Research and development .............. 26-12 26-12 .26-12 Terminal facilities. City of Pittsburgh constructed a modern wharf for river freight. There are numerous privately maintained terminals and docks, consisting of tipples, various types of hoists, chutes, and pipelines for use in loading and unloading coal, stone, sand, gravel, petroleum products, steel products, and other commodities. Transshipment of freight between river and railroads is handled at privately owned river-to-rail terminals. Existing private terminals are adequate for shipments and receipt in Pittsburgh District of type of commerce now in existence. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Contract for Resurfacing Land Wall and Esplanade and Paving Access Road, Lock and Dam 2, awarded Sept. 9, 1980 was 100% complete in August 1981. A contract was awarded in February 1981 for Furnishing and Installing a 60-kilowatt Hydro-electric Unit, Lock and Dam 2, at a cost of $219,475. Unit is scheduled to be installed in March 1982. Locks were operated as required and necessary repairs were 26-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 " made to structures to maintain them in a serviceable condition. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project is complete, the last lock, No. 9, was placed in service in 1938. All locks and dams are in fair condition. Navigation channel has been widened at certain points and, in general, maintained to project depth, thus affording adequate depth for passage of commercial tows. 2. CONSTRUCTION OF LOCKS AND DAMS, OHIO RIVER See this heading under Ohio River portion. 3. MONONGAHELA RIVER, PA. AND W. VA. Location. Formed by junction of Tygart and West Fork Rivers about 1 mile south of Fairmont, W. Va., and flows northerly for 128.7 miles to its junction with Allegheny River, forming Ohio River at Pittsburgh, Pa. (See Geological Survey Charts for southwestern Pennsylvania and northern West Virginia.) Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1963, page 1070. Existing project. Provides for improvement of river by 9 locks and dams to afford slack-water navigation for its entire length from Pittsburgh to above Fairmont, W. Va. Original locks and dams 7, 8 and 9 were replaced by new locks and dams 7 and 8 in 1925. Increased traffic necessitated enlargement and improvement of locks and dams 1 to 6 between Pittsburgh and Rices Landing, Pa., by building two parallel chambers and fixed concrete dams during 1905 and 1932. Locks and dam 1 were eliminated in 1938 by raising Emsworth Dam, Ohio River. Reconstruction of lock 2 was completed in 1953 to provide two modern navigation chambers. The existing locks and dam 2 were originally completed in 1907; major modifications were made in 1923 and 1924, and in 1926 the upper guard and guide walls were extended. Construction of Maxwell locks and dam and the reconstruction of dam 4 have allowed for removal of obsolete locks and dams 5 and 6. Small and antiquated original locks and dams 10 to 15, inclusive, have been replaced by three modern structures. Morgantown lock and dam, initial step in replacement program, was completed in 1950 replacing locks and dams 10 and 11. Hildebrand lock and dam, next upstream, was completed in 1959 replacing locks and dams 12 and 13. Raising crest of dam 8 was also completed in 1959 as part of upper river improvement and eliminates restricted depth in upper reach of pool. Opekiska lock and dam was completed in 1967 replacing locks and dams 14 and 15. Completion of this link in upper river replacement program provides for entire river length of minimum channel depth of 9 feet, varying in width from a minimum of 250 feet to practically full width at mouth. The proposed Grays Landing lock and dam and Point Marion replacement lock would replace existing obsolete lock and dam 7 and lock 8, respectively. Locks and dam 3 showed advanced stages of deterioration and, because of its strategic location and its importance to industry throughout the Greater Pittsburgh area and the nation, emergency remedial work had to be done in 1977. Major rehabilitation of locks and dam 3 was completed on Oct. 27, 1980. Estimated final cost: $12,460,000. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. City of Pittsburgh constructed a modern wharf for freight. Boat landings are maintained by some municipalities along the river. A large number of tipples at mines and various types of hoists at manufacturing plants and sand and gravel supply companies are maintained for private use in loading and unloading coal, coke, billets, steel products, sand, gravel, and other commodities. These terminals and docks are not available for general commerce. A number of docks and pipelines are also privately maintained for petroleum and acid products. Marine ways are maintained by some of the larger industries. There are also several terminals for rail-to-river and river-to-rail transfer. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Work on the locks and dam 3 major rehabilitation project was completed in October 1980 at an estimated final cost of $12,460,000. Study for replacement of locks and dams for lower reach of river is being conducted as part of the continuing modernization program for the entire Monongahela River. The Reconnaissance Report on the Monongahela River Navigation System, Stage I Studies was submitted in Jan. 1981 and the Intermediate Report, Stage II is scheduled for submittal in March 1982. Operation and maintenance, general: A contract was awarded May 28, 1981 in the amount of $116,500 for Replacement of Auxiliary Crane, Maxwell Locks and Dam, and progressed to 75% completion. Contract for Painting of Tainter Gates, Lock and Dam 4, was awarded on Sept.18, 1981 in the amount of $141,400. Work is not scheduled to begin until Spring 1982. Locks were operated as required and necessary repairs were made to structures to maintain them in a serviceable condition. Condition at end of fiscal year. A controlling depth of 9 feet is maintained for the entire length of river, varying in width from a minimum of 250 feet to full width of river at mouth. Major rehabilitation of locks and dam 3 was physically completed on Oct. 27, 1980. Estimated final cost for rehabilitation work is $12,460,000. 4. OPEN-CHANNEL WORK, OHIO RIVER See this heading under Ohio River portion. 5. TYGART LAKE, W. VA. Location. Tygart Lake is located on the Tygart River in Taylor and Barbour Counties, northcentral W. Va. The lake is approximately 26 road miles due east of Clarksburg, W. Va. and 30 road miles south of Morgantown. The dam is situated 22.7 river miles above the mouth of the Tygart River at Fairmont, or 2.25 miles upstream from Grafton, W. Va., and about 78 miles south of Pittsburgh, Pa. (See Geological Survey Charts for Fairmont, Thornton, and Belington, W. Va.) Existing project. A reservoir for low water regulation and flood control. Dam is concrete gravity type with an uncontrolled center spillway flanked by abutment sections joining valley sides. Project was authorized by Public Works Administration January 11, 1934, and adopted by 1935 River and Harbor Act. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962. (See Table 26-A for project costs.) Public visitation to the project is approaching 1,000,000 recreation days annually and this upward trend in attendance indicates an increased demand for upgrading and expansion of public-use facilities. Current estimate for construction of recreation facilities at completed project is $1,520,000 of which $635,000 are non-Federal costs. Local cooperation. The State of West Virginia has assumed responsibility for the development and operation of hunting and fishing areas as well as the Tygart Lake State Park. Controlled releases for downstream navigation and recreation are also coordinated with others to the extent feasible. No local cooperation is required at completed project; however, future recreational developments are subject to certain conditions of non-Federal 26-2 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT cost-sharing under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. This cost-sharing agreement has been executed with the West Virginia Department of Recreation. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Plans and specifications for cost-sharing facilities at Tygart Lake State Park, Right Bank, were completed in April 1981. The cost-sharing contract for Construction of Water Supply, Sewage Collection System and Sewage Treatment Plant, Right Bank Facilities, was awarded Sept. 25, 1981 in the amount of $517,629.25. Plans and specifications for sanitary facilities at damsite picnic area were initiated in fiscal year 1981 and are scheduled to be completed in November 1981 with a contract award anticipated to be made early in fiscal year 1982. Operation and maintenance, general: Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control and low water regulation, as required, and project structures were operated and maintained in a serviceable condition throughout the year. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir for this period were $3,929,000. Total flood control benefits for this reservoir through September 30, 1981 are $226,370,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management, and operation and maintenance of public-use facilities continued. This work was limited in scope as State of West Virginia has jurisdiction over recreation in reservoir area. Condition at end of fiscal year. Authorized project is complete. Reservoir is in operation for low water control in Monongahela River and for purpose of flood protection in Monongahela and Ohio Valleys. Construction of dam was started in 1935 and placed in operation in 1938. Land acquired for project consists of 2,662.9 acres in fee, flowage easements over 1,216.9 acres and 1,731.9 acres of other easements. 6. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS See Table 26-F on other authorized navigation projects. Flood Control - Local Protection 7. CHARTIERS CREEK, PA. Location. Within Washington and Allegheny Counties, southwestern Pennsylvania, a tributary of Ohio River. (See Geological Survey Chart for Carnegie, Pa.) Existing project. Provides for channel widening, deepening and realignment, construction of a major channel cutoff, and relocations in two separate and independent reaches. James G. Fultonr project in Allegheny County would be about 13.4 miles long and Canonsburg-Houston reach in Washington County about 4.7 miles long. Completed improvements would contain within banks, all floods up to the 1912 maximum of record, but with some residual damage, and would greatly reduce flood stages and damages resulting from higher floods. Project was authorized by Flood Control Act of 1965. Estimated cost for new work (1981) is $41,100,000 of which $32,000,000 is Federal cost and $9,100,000 non-Federal cost. Local cooperation. Responsible local interests must provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, and spoil-disposal areas for construction; bear cost of all relocations and alterations of sewer, water, gas, oil, electric powerlines, and other utility alterations; railroad track shifts; highway and street modifications; and construction of new or reconstruction of existing highway bridges made necessary by construction work; hold United States free from damages; establish channel limit lines within each county along entire waterway downstream from existing improvements at Washington, Pa., and prevent any encroachment which wduld reduce flood carrying capacity of the channel so defined; inform affected interests at least annually that project will not provide complete protection from flood greater in magnitude than that which occured in September 1912; and maintain and operate project works after completion. Board of County Commissioners, Washington County, local cooperating agency for James G. Fulton Flood Protection Project provided formal assurances of local cooperation which were accepted by District Engineer on July 12, 1967 and November 27, 1967, respectively. Tri-party contract between Allegheny County Sanitary Authority, Chartiers Valley District Flood Control Authority and United States of America covering relocation of sanitary sewer facilities in James G. Fulton Flood Protection Project was approved April 4, 1968. Local interests completed acquisition of rights-of-entry and arrangements for utility adjustments for all 5 Units of James G. Fulton Protection Project and for Units 1 and 2A of Canonsburg-Houston reach. Local cooperating agency (Washington County) has been unable to provide the necessary rights-of-way for the remaining Unit 2B. Non-Federal contributions have been made in the amount of $4,219,967. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Contract for construction of Unit 4 of James G. Fulton Flood Protection Project was completed in June 1981. A contract for Environmental Improvement, Unit 4, James G. Fulton, was awarded in September 1981 in the amount of $22,120.04. Plans and specifications for Unit 2B, the remaining unit of this reach, were 99% complete at end of fiscal year. Regular inspections were made at completed units. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by the Chartiers Creek project through September 30, 1981, totaled $11,347,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. James G. Fulton Flood Control Project-Construction of Unit 1 was started in July 1968, completed in September 1970, and turned over to local interests for operation and maintenance on June 25, 1971. Construction of Unit 2 was started in April 1970, completed in April 1973, and turned over to local interests on November 22, 1974. Construction of Unit 3 was started in July 1971 and was completed in December 1974. Construction of Unit 5 was started in June 1972 and was completed in December 1973. Construction of Unit 4 channel improvement was started in July 1978 and was completed in June 1981. A contract for Environmental Improvement, Unit 4, James G. Fulton, was awarded in September 1981 in the amount of $22,120.04 and is scheduled for completion in fiscal year 1982. Canonsburg-Houston Reach- Construction of Unit 1 was started in December 1968, completed in March 1970, and turned over to local interests for operation and maintenance on August 10, 1970. Construction of Unit 2A was started January 17, 1976, completed December 16, 1976, and turned over to local interests on June 9, 1977. Construction plans and specifications for Unit 2B, the remaining unit of this reach, were 99% complete at end of fiscal year. Work on project has been delayed due to the inability of local cooperating agency to provide the necessary rights-of-way. 8. ELKINS, W. VA. Location. On Tygart River in north-central Randolph County, W. Va., about 155 miles south of Pittsburgh, Pa. It is at downstream end of a long, broad reach of upper Tygart Valley, about 75 miles above mouth of river. (See Geological Survey Chart for Elkins, W.Va.) Existing project. Provides flood protection by diverting flood discharges from upstream arm of loop of natural river channel into an artificial cutoff channel, thereby bypassing city of Elkins. 26-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 Improvement is designed to accommodate discharges equivalent to maximum flood of reasonable expectancy. Project was authorized by 1938 Flood Control Act. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1222. Federal cost of completed project was $1,772,627; estimated non-Federal cost for lands, easements, and rights-of-way was $40,000. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Routine inspections were made. A contract was awarded Sept. 24, 1980 for Clearing and Bar Removal and Inlet Works Intake Grating, at an estimated cost of $41,688 and was 100% complete in December 1980. Cumulative total flood damages prevented to September 30, 1981, $3,027,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project construction was started May 1946 and completed May 1949. Completed works, except that portion of channel maintained by Federal Government, has been operated and maintained by City of Elkins since March 31, 1949. Land acquired for project consists of 32.04 acres in fee and 526.01 acres in easements. 9. GIRTY'S RUN, MILLVALE, PA. Location. Girtys Run rises in the Fox Ridge area of the southern portion of McCandless Township, Allegheny County, and flows generally southeast through Ross and Shaler Townships and the Borough of Millvale to enter the Allegheny River from the right bank at River Mile 3.6 above the "Point" at Pittsburgh. (See U.S. Geological Survey chart for Pittsburgh, Pa., East.) Existing project. To decrease flooding conditions in the Borough of Millvale area, project consists of lowering the existing channel bottom within the limits of the existing walls. The lowering was accomplished by a 16-foot average bottom width of cut in rock or overburden averaging 4 feet in depth in the lower 2,750 feet of the project and 2 1/2 feet in depth for the remaining portion. Existing masonry walls of the channel were replaced and/or stabilized where required. Project was authorized for construction by the Chief of Engineers under authority of Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act as amended. Federal cost is $2,000,000; estimated non-Federal cost of lands, easements and rights-of-way, utility adjustments, and amount in excess of $2 million limitation established by Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act as amended, is estimated at $1,836,722. Local cooperation. Responsible local interests must provide, without cost to the United States, all lands, easements, rightsof- way, and borrow and spoil-disposal areas as necessary for construction; bear cost of all necessary relocations, removals, alterations and adjustments of buildings, highways and highway bridges, and water, sanitary sewer, and other utilities and related or special facilities; hold the United States free from damages due to the construction; establish and enforce channel limit lines to prevent encroachment on the improved channel; maintain and operate the project works after completion; at least annually notify affected interests that the project will not provide complete flood protection. Formal assurances of local cooperation, executed by the Borough of Millvale on June 17, 1975, were accepted by the District Engineer on June 20, 1975. The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and the County of Allegheny, Pennsylvania, have each agreed to provide to the Borough of Millvale 50% of all estimated non-Federal costs. Non-Federal contributions have been made in the amount of $701,722. Operations and results during fiscal year. Work on the project started July 11, 1976 with a scheduled completion date of November 22, 1977; however, by that date the contract work had progressed to only about 50% of completion and it was found necessary to terminate that contract for default due to unsatisfactory and untimely performance. Subsequently, a new contract for completion of the remaining work was made on May 4, 1978 and work was completed July 26, 1980 at a cost of $2,091,522.95. Formal hearings were held on July 26, 1978 before the Division Engineer and July 8-15, 1980, inclusive, before the Engineer Board of Contract Appeals regarding the appeal of the defaulted contractor. In August 1981, a tentative agreement was reached with the surety and default contractor regarding the liability resulting from the termination. Modification effecting settlement and release stipulation is being finalized. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of project 100% complete on June 26, 1980. Final acceptance made Sept. 9, 1980. 10. JOHNSTOWN, PA. Location. In southwestern Cambria County, Pa., about 58 miles east of Pittsburgh, Pa. It is in a deep and comparatively narrow valley at junction of Stoney Creek and Little Conemaugh River, which unite to form Conemaugh River. (See Geological Survey Chart for Johnstown, Pa.) Existing project. Provides for increased channel capacity by enlarging and realigning channels and protecting banks with concrete pavement. Improvement designed to accommodate discharges equivalent to those of March 1936 flood, maximum natural flow of record, minimum of overbank flow and to practically eliminate damages therefrom. Project was authorized by Flood Control Acts of 1936 and 1937. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1215. (See Table 26-A for project costs.) Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938, applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Operation activities and routine investigations and inspections were made. Flood damages prevented by project for fiscal year were estimated to be $574,000; cumulative total to September 30, 1981 was $414,732,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project construction began in August 1938 and was completed November 1943. Footer protection for Unit 4 was completed in November 1949. For further details see page 1216 of Annual Report for 1962. Land acquired for project consists of easements over 192 acres. 11. PUNXSUTAWNEY, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA. Location. Borough of Punxsutawney is on Mahoning Creek in Jefferson County, Pa., about 85 miles northeast of Pittsburgh, Pa. It is on a comparatively wide, alluvial flood plain about 52 miles above mouth of stream and 30 miles above Mahoning Creek flood control dam. (See Geological Survey Charts for Punxsutawney and Smicksburg, Pa.) Existing project. Provides flood protection by channel enlargement, dikes, and walls. Improvement is designed to accommodate discharges 20% greater than that of maximum flood of record. Project was authorized by 1938 Flood Control Act. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1209. (See Table 26-A for project costs.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Operation activities and routine investigations and inspections were made. Cumulative total flood damages prevented by project were estimated to be $28,278,000 to end of September 1981. 26-4 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was accomplished by construction of four units. Construction started May 1946 and was completed June 1950. Land acquired for project consists of perpetual easements over 72.6 acres. Completed works, except that portion of channel maintained by the Federal Government, have been operated and maintained by Borough of Punxsutawney since July 31, 1950. 12. ROOT CREEK, BOLIVAR, N.Y. Location. The problem area is located in the southwestern portion of the State of New York in the Village of Bolivar, Allegany County, about 17 road miles east of Olean, New York. (See Geological Survey Chart of Olean, N.Y.) Existing project. Flooding of the Village of Bolivar from Root Creek causes estimated annual damages in the amount of about $53,000. The project will consist of 3,230 feet of Root Creek channel modification, including moderate widening, deepening and slope protection. The plan will provide Bolivar with protection against a flood having a frequency of once in 100 years. Total first cost of the plan is estimated to be $1,250,000. Project was authorized for construction by the Chief of Enginiers under authority of Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act as amended. Final EIS filed with CEQ on March 11, 1976. The Detailed Project Report was approved April 29, 1976. Plans and specifications are complete. Assurances were executed by the State of New York Department of Environmental Conservation and accepted by the Department of the Army on March 23, 1977. All interests in real estate required for project construction are available. Reliable utility adjustment schedule from New York DEC has been received. Land acquired for project consists of 7.809 acres. (See Table 26-A for cost and financial statement and Table 26-K for fiscal year costs.) Local cooperation. Requirements are: Provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way, including borrow and spoil disposal areas, necessary for the construction, operation and maintenance of the project, and comply with all applicable provisions of the Uniform Relocations Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (Public Law 91-646), approved January 2, 1971; provide without cost to the United States all modifications, alterations or relocations of buildings, roads, streets, bridges, utilities, pipelines and related or special facilities necessary for construction, operation and maintenance of the project; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; maintain and operate the project works after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army; at least annually notify interests affected that project will not provide complete flood protection; and bear and pay to the United States prior to initiation of construction, all Federal costs for the project, if any, in excess of the Federal cost limitation of $2,000,000 as established by Public Law 858, 80th Congress, approved June 30, 1948, as amended. Condition at end of fiscal year. Contract for construction of Bolivar Flood Protection Project was awarded Sept. 17, 1979 for $945,077.71. Construction progressed to approximately 82% completion at end of fiscal year. An alternate stone source is being acquired to enable completion of gabion placement (remaining work). Work is anticipated to be complete early in fiscal year 1982. 13. TENMILE CREEK AT MARIANNA, PA. Location. On Tenmile Creek in and near Marianna and vicinity, Washington County, Pa., and about 13 miles southeast of the City of Washington, Pa. (See Geological Survey chart for Amity, Pa.) Existing project. Flood protection along Tenmile Creek in Villages of East Marianna and West Zollarsville by channel widening, deepening and minor realignment for a distance of 7,761 feet with the lower end of improvement beginning 5,035 feet downstream of existing Jefferson Avenue highway bridge which connects the Villages of East Marianna and West Zollarsville, Pa. Improvement is designed to eliminate damages from floods up to the magnitude of that of March 1963 with slight residual damage. Project was authorized for construction by Chief of Engineers under authority of Section 205, 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. (See Table 26-A for cost and financial statement and Table 26-K for fiscal year costs.) Local cooperation. Local interests must provide lands, rightsof- way and spoil disposal areas for construction; adjust utilities, hold United States free from damages; establish channel limit lines and prevent encroachment in channel so delineated; and maintain project works after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by Secretary of the Army. Formal assurances of local cooperation provided by Bethlehem Township, the local cooperating agency, were accepted by District Engineer of May 24, 1968 and supplemented by joint agreement November 20, 1976. This modification provides that local interests will comply with the provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (P.L. 91-646), and make all relocations payments, provide all assistance and pay all expenses and/or litigation costs incidental to the transfer of such real property to the Township as required. Financial and legal ability of Township to fulfill the assurances have been provided. Agreement dated April 14, 1977 executed between the Department of Environmental Resources and the Township of West Bethlehem encumbering $30,000 to the Marianna Local Flood Protection Project. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Contract for Environmental Improvement awarded March 6, 1981 in the amount of $41,834.16 was 100% complete on August 31, 1981. This contract superseded a contract offered to an SBA 8(a) contractor on August 5, 1980. The Small Business administrator cancelled the contract and released it from the 8(a) program as the proposed contractor was unable to provide the necessary performance and payment bonds and distribution of the contract had not been made. All necessary rights-of-way for environmental improvement work were received from the Township of West Bethlehem on March 22, 1980. Condition at end of fiscal year. Contract for construction of channel improvement awarded October 7, 1977 and completed February 19, 1979 at a final cost of $1,168,997.48. Contract for Environmental Improvement awarded March 6, 1981 in the amount of $41,834.16 was 100% complete on August 31, 1981. Flood Control - Reservoirs 14. BERLIN LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OHIO Location. Dam is on Mahoning River about 73 miles above its confluence with Shenango River. It is about 10 miles above existing Milton Reservoir Dam and 35 miles upstream from Warren, Ohio. Reservoir is in Portage, Mahoning and Stark Counties, Ohio. (See Geological Survey charts for Warren, Ravenna, and Alliance, Ohio.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and water supply. Dam consists of a partially controlled, concrete gravity, center spillway flanked by rolled-earthfill abutment sections joining valley sides. Project selected for construction under 26-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. For further project description, see Annual Report for 1962, page 1233. (See Table 26-A for project costs.) Current estimate for construction of recreational and sanitary facilities at completed project is $2,900,700 of which $100,000 were non- Federal costs. Local cooperation. None required at completed project; however, future recreational developments are subject to certain conditions of non-Federal cost-sharing under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Contract for preparation of Master Plan Design Memorandum No. 1 progressed to 80% completion at end of fiscal year. Plans and specifications for Construction of Ranger Station progressed to 50% completion. A contract for Repaving Parking Area No. 1, Mill Creek Recreation Area, was negotiated with an SBA 8(a) minority contractor in September 1981 in the amount of $22,508.80 with work to be performed and completed in fiscal year 1982. Reservoir was operated as required and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir for this period were $7,031,000; total benefits through September 30, 1981, $185,882,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management, and operation and maintenance of public-use facilities continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Authorized project is complete and in operation for flood control and low water regulation purposes in industrialized Mahoning Valley below. Construction of dam was started January 1942 and completed June 1943. Present project lands consists of 6,885.3 acres in fee and 1,098.7 acres in easements. 15. CONEMAUGH RIVER LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA. Location. Dam is on Conemaugh River in Indiana and Westmoreland Counties, Pa., 7.5 miles above junction of Conemaugh River and Loyalhanna Creek, which form the head of the Kiskiminetas River. It is about 2 miles northeast of Tunnelton, Pa., and about 42 miles east of Pittsburgh, Pa. Reservoir is in Westmoreland and Indiana Counties, Pa. (See Geological Survey Charts for Latrobe, New Florence, and Elders Ridge, Pa.) Existing Project. A flood control reservoir dam of concrete gravity type with a gate-controlled center spillway flanked by abutment sections joining valley sides and an earth embankment ending in right abutment. Project authorized by Flood Control Acts of 1936 and 1938. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1217. (See Table 26-A for project costs.) Estimated cost of sanitary facilities required to upgrade area and comply with sanitary codes is $275,000. Local cooperation. None required by law. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Plans and specifications for sanitary facilities at damsite picnic area were 95% complete at end of fiscal year. A contract award for this work is anticipated to be made early in fiscal year 1982. Operation and maintenance, general: Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir for this fiscal year were $9,401,000; total flood control benefits through September 30, 1981 are $523,190,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management and operation and maintenance of public-use facilities were continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Authorized project is complete. Reservoir is in operation as a unit of a coordinated reservoir system designed for protection of Pittsburgh and reduction of flood heights in upper Ohio Valley, generally. Construction of dam and appurtenances was started in April 1949 and completed in December 1952. Furnishing and erecting of 2 gantry cranes and 14 crest gates by contract were started in November and December 1951, and completed in August and September 1953, respectively. Relocation of main line of Conemaugh division, Pennsylvania Railroad, was started by contract in April 1946 and completed in September 1950. Land acquired for dam, reservoir and railroad relocation consists of 7,635.1 acres in fee and 518.57 acres in easements. 16. CROOKED CREEK LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA. Location. Dam is on Crooked Creek 6.7 miles above junction of creek with Allegheny River near Ford City, Pa., and about 32 miles northeast of Pittsburgh, Pa. (See Geological Survey Charts for Freeport and Elders Ridge, Pa.) Existing project. A flood control reservoir dam of earthfill type with separate uncontrolled saddle spillway and tunnel outlet works. Project was authorized by Flood Control Acts of 1936 and 1938. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1213. (See Table 26-A for project costs.) Current estimated cost of sanitary facilities, required to upgrade area and comply with state sanitary codes, is $2,161,000. Local cooperation. None required by law. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Plans and specifications for construction of a maintenance building and for replacement of windows and security screens were initiated and completed in fiscal year 1981. Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control, as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir for this period were $2,024,000; total benefits through September 30, 1981 are $118,327,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management, and operation and maintenance of certain public-use facilities continued. This work was limited in scope as Commonwealth of Pennsylvania had jurisdiction over recreation in reservoir area, however, by letter dated August 14, 1981 the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania exercised its option to relinquish their lease to be effective October 1, 1981. Condition at end of fiscal year. Authorized project is complete. Reservoir is in operation as a unit of a coordinated reservoir system designed for protection of Pittsburgh and reduction of flood heights in upper Ohio Valley, generally. Construction of dam was started in March 1938 and completed October 1940. Present project lands consist of 2,563.59 acres in fee and 99.98 acres in easements. 17. EAST BRANCH, CLARION RIVER LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA. Location. Dam is in Elk County, Pa., on East Branch of Clarion River above Middle Fork, 7.3 miles above junction of East and West Branches of Clarion River at Johnsonburg, Pa., and about 105 miles northeast of Pittsburgh, Pa. Reservoir is in Elk County, Pa. (See Geological Survey Chart for Mount Jewett, Pa.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and low-water regulation. Dam is rolled-earthfill type with gate-controlled concrete tunnel under right abutment and a paved uncontrolled spillway on left abutment slope. Project was selected for construction under general authorization for Ohio River Basin in Flood Control Acts of 1938 and 1944. For further project descrip- 26-6 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT tion see Annual Report for 1962, page 1206. (See Table 26-A for project costs.) Estimated cost of construction of additional sanitary facilities, required to upgrade area and comply with state sanitary codes, is $195,000; current total estimate of recreation facilities at completed project, $336,800. Local Cooperation. None required by law. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Plans and specification for sanitary facilities at the campground recreation area were approximately 40% complete at fiscal year end. Operation and maintenance general: Plans and specifications for replacing heating system in dam tower were initiated and progressed to 75% completion. A contract for Cavity Exploration was awarded August 21, 1981 in the amount of $32,530 and is scheduled to be completed by November 10, 1981. Reservoir was operated for flood control and low-water regulation, as required; and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir during this fiscal year were $1,316,000, total benefits through September 30, 1981, $29,912,000. Some reservoir management activity was performed throughout the year comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management and operation of public-use facilities. Work was limited in scope as bulk of reservoir lands are owned by Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Condition at end of fiscal year. Authorized project is complete. Reservoir is in operation for low-water regulation purposes in Clarion River Valley below and for flood control as a unit of a coordinated reservoir system for protection of Pittsburgh and upper Ohio Valley, generally. Construction of dam was started in June 1947 and completed in July 1952. Present project lands consist of 287.2 acres in fee and 1,296.7 acres in easements. 18. KINZUA DAM AND ALLEGHENY RESERVOIR, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA. AND N.Y. Location. Dam site is on Allegheny River 9 miles above Warren, Pa., and 198 miles above mouth of river at Pittsburgh, Pa. Reservoir is in Warren and McKean Counties, Pa., and Cattaraugus County, N.Y. (See Geological Survey Charts for Warren and Kinzua, Pa. - N.Y., and Randolph and Salamanca, N.Y.) Existing project. Reservoir provides flood control, low water regulation, and recreation. Dam consists of a combination concrete gravity structure and rolled earth embankment with gatecontrolled spillway and discharge conduits controlled by slidegates in gravity section. For further details see Annual Reports for 1962, page 1202. Project was authorized by Flood Control Acts of 1936, 1938 and 1941. (See Table 26-A for project costs.) Current estimated cost of additional recreation and sanitary facilities required to upgrade area and comply with sanitary codes is $135,000. A major rehabilitation plan was approved for repairs to the dam stilling basin. Current cost estimate for this work is: $6,000,000. Local cooperation. None required by law. Licenses. The Federal Power Commission granted a license to Pennsylvania Electric Company and Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company on December 28, 1965, for the joint construction, operation and maintenance of a 325-megawatt pumped-storage installation (FPC Project No. 2280). The project is complete. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: A major rehabilitation plan was approved for repairs to the dam stilling basin in fiscal year 1980. Current cost estimate for this work is: $6,000,000. The feature design memorandum was initiated in fiscal year 1981 and was 30% complete at end of fiscal year. Plans and specifications will begin in fiscal year 1982 with a construction contract award scheduled for August 1982. Plans and specifications for constructing security gates were initiated and progressed to 95% completion. A contract award for this work is scheduled to be made in February 1982. Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control and low water regulation, as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir for this period were $18,144,000; total to end of this fiscal year, $300,801,000. Of 2,212 surface tracts authorized for acquisition, all have been acquired. Final judgments remain to be entered on 28 surface tracts acquired by condemnation. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management, and operation and maintenance of public-use facilities were continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of project, initiated in February 1960 is complete. Construction of dam was started in September 1960 and completed in December 1965. Development of recreation area at Onoville under a cost-sharing agreement with Cattaraugus County was completed in June 1978. Land acquired for project consists of 2,646.6 acres in fee and easements over 22,420.4 acres. 19. LOYALHANNA LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA. Location. Dam is on Loyalhanna Creek, 4.5 miles above junction of creek with Conemaugh River at Saltsburgh, Pa., and about 29 miles east of Pittsburgh, Pa. Reservoir is in Westmoreland County, Pa. (See Geological Survey Chart for Latrobe.) Existing project. A flood control reservoir dam of concrete gravity type with a gate-controlled center spillway flanked by abutment sections joining valley sides, and an earth embankment section ending in left abutment. Project was authorized by Flood Control Acts of 1936 and 1938. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1219. (See Table 26-A for project costs.) Current estimated cost of recreation and sanitary facilities at completed project is $2,562,000. Of this amount, $1,100,000 would be non-Federal costs. Local cooperation. None required by law. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Plans and specifications for the Resource Manager's Complex and Dam Picnic Area sanitary facilities were initiated in fiscal year 1980 and 100% complete in May 1981. Construction award for this work is currently scheduled for December 1981. Contract for Master Plan Design Memorandum No. 1 progressed to 75% completion and is currently scheduled to be completed in April 1982. Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control, as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir for this fiscal year were $2,583,000; total benefits to September 30, 1981, $157,974,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management and operation and maintenance of public-use facilities continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Authorized project is complete. Reservoir is in operation as a unit of a coordinated reservoir system designed for protection of Pittsburgh and reduction of flood heights in upper Ohio Valley, generally. Construction of dam was started in October 1939 and completed in June 1942. Land acquired for project consists of 3,334.7 acres in fee and easements over 86.8 acres. 20. MAHONING CREEK LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA. Location. Dam is on Mahoning Creek in Armstrong County, 26-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 Pa., 21.6 miles above junction of creek with Allegheny River. It is about 6.50 miles southeast of New Bethlehem, Pa., and about 51 miles northeast of Pittsburgh, Pa. Reservoir is in Armstrong, Indiana, and Jefferson Counties, Pa. (See Geological Survey Charts for Rural Valley and Smicksburg, Pa.) Existing project. A flood control reservoir dam of concrete gravity type with a gate-controlled center spillway flanked by abutment sections joining valley sides. Project was authorized by Flood Control Acts of 1936 and 1938. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1210. (See Table 26-A for project costs.) Current estimated cost of recreation and sanitary facilities at completed project is $1,290,000. Of this amount, $479,000 would be non-Federal costs. Local cooperation. None required at completed project. On November 4, 1977 a contract for wildlife development at Mahoning Creek Lake was executed between the U.S. Government and the Pennsylvania Game Commission. Each party will pay or contribute in kind 50% of the first costs of initial wildlife development. On June 7, 1979, a contract for fishing and boating development at Mahoning Creek Lake was executed between the U.S. Government and the Pennsylvania Fish Commission. Each party will pay or contribute in kind 50% of the first costs of initial fishing and boating development. On September 9, 1980, a contract for camping and day-use recreational development was executed between the U.S. Government and the County of Armstrong. Each party will pay or contribute in kind 50% of the first costs of initial camping and day-use recreational development and 50% of the costs for future development. Each cooperating authority is responsible for operation, maintenance and replacements without cost to the Government of all facilities developed for their support. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Plans and specifications for recreation development at Milton Loop Camping Area and for construction of Fishing Access Areas were completed in April 1981. Contract for construction of Hunting Access Area, awarded July 30, 1980, only progressed to 24% completion. Contractor will be terminated in October 1981 due to lack of progress; bonding company will finish this job. Contract for construction of Fishing Access Area, awarded Sept. 24, 1980 was 100% complete on July 17, 1981 at a final cost of $335,405.75. A contract was awarded July 29, 1981 for construction of the Milton Loop Recreation Area in the amount of $337,897; scheduled completion date August 19, 1982. Operation and maintenance general: Plans and specifications for painting gantry cranes and crest gates and for renovating crane controls were initiated and completed in fiscal year 1981. A contract was awarded Sept. 23, 1981 for Painting Gantry Cranes and Crest Gates and work will not begin until the Spring of 1982. Estimated cost for this work is: $68,000. The contract for Renovating Crane Controls is scheduled to be awarded in October 1981 at an estimated cost of $50,000. Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir for this fiscal year were $2,413,000; total to September 30, 1981, $147,005,000. Activities under reservoir management and maintenance for public-use facilities continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Authorized project is complete. Reservoir is in operation as a unit of a coordinated reservoir system designed for protection of Pittsburgh and reduction of flood heights in upper Ohio Valley, generally. Construction of dam was started in February 1939 and completed in June 1941. Land acquired for project consists of 2,532.6 acres in fee and easements over 83.5 acres. 21. MICHAEL J. KIRWAN DAM AND RESERVOIR, OHIO Location. Dam site is on West Branch of Mahoning River which joins Mahoning River at Newton Falls, Ohio. It is 11 miles above mouth of branch and about 15 miles upstream from Warren, Ohio. Reservoir is in Portage County, Ohio. (See Geological Survey Charts for Ravenna, Garrettsville, Chagrin Falls, and Kent, Ohio.) Existing project. Reservoir provides flood control, low-water regulation and recreation. Dam consists of a rolled-earth embankment structure with gate-controlled outlet works and an uncontrolled side-hill spillway through left abutment. For further description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1231 (West Branch Reservoir, Mahoning River, Ohio). Project was authorized by 1958 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 191, 85th Cong. 1st sess.), with local contribution requirements modified by Flood Control Act of 1960. Federal cost of completed project was $17,370,000. Local interests contributed $3,230,000 during period of contruction bringing initial project cost to $20,600,000. Current estimate for construction of recreation facilities at completed project is $1,100,000, of which $275,000 are non-Federal costs. Local Cooperation. Local interests must contribute $5,200,000 for water pollution abatement and for municipal and industrial water supply purposes, of which $3,230,000 was paid in cash during construction. Unpaid balance at time project is placed in operation, $1,970,000, will be paid in cash at that time or on an annual basis. Of the unpaid balance of contributed funds due and payable, payment in full of Trumbull County's share in the amount of $663,040 has been received. Mahoning County elected to pay their share ($1,306,960) in 50 annual installments of $50,323.32, including interest, and has paid $365,948.80 toward principal to date. Local interests have now contributed $4,258,988.80 towards total of $5,200,000 non- Federal costs. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Plans and specifications for construction of sanitary facilities at dam area were initiated in fiscal year 1981 and progressed to 85% completion. Operation and maintenance, general: Contract for Master Plan Design Memorandum No. 8 was 90% complete at end of fiscal year and is scheduled to be completed by November 1981. Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control and low-flow augmentation, as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this dam for this fiscal year were $3,745,000. Total flood control benefits for this reservoir through September 30, 1981 are $64,758,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management, and operation and maintenance of public-use facilities continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Authorized project is complete and in operation for flood control and low water regulation purposes. Construction of dam and access road was started in May 1963 and completed in November 1966. Land acquired for project consists of 6,298.9 acres in fee and easements over 27.9 acres. 22. MOSQUITO CREEK LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OHIO Location. Dam is on Mosquito Creek, 9 miles above junction of creek with Mahoning River at Niles Ohio, and about 18 miles northwest of Youngstown, Ohio. (See Geological Survey Charts for Bristolville and Kinsman, Ohio, and Pennsylvania.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control, low-water regulation and water supply storage. Dam is rolled-earthfill type with outlet facilities through dam, and an uncontrolled natural wasteway to discharge overflow from reservoir. Project was selected for construction under general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1228. (See Table 26-8 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT 26-A for project costs.) Current estimate of total recreation and sanitary facilities required to upgrade areas and comply with sanitary codes is $2,103,000 of which $795,000 would be non- Federal costs. Local cooperation. None required at completed project; however, future recreational developments are subject to certain conditions of non-Federal cost-sharing under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control and low-flow regulation as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this dam for this fiscal year were $2,828,000. Total flood control benefits for this reservoir through September 30, 1981 are $52,497,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management and operation and maintenance of certain public-use facilities continued. This work was limited in scope as State of Ohio has jurisdiction over recreation in reservoir area. Condition at end of fiscal year. Authorized project is complete and in operation for flood control and low-water regulation purposes in industrialized Mahoning and Beaver Valleys below. Construction of dam was started in July 1943 and was ready for beneficial use in January 1944. Land acquired for project consists of 11,180.44 acres in fee and easements over 276.0 acres. State of Ohio has a license from Secretary of the Army for development and operation of recreation facilities in reservoir area. 23. OHIO RIVER BASIN (PITTSBURGH DISTRICT) Location. A series of levees, floodwalls, channel improvements, and reservoirs/lakes in Ohio River Basin within Pittsburgh District. Existing project. Individual projects considered in comprehensive plan within Pittsburgh District. (See Tables 26-B, 26-G and 26-H on Acts authorizing existing projects, local protection projects and reservoirs.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: None by the United States except as stated in individual projects. Completed local protection projects operated and maintained by local interests, including those projects for which individual reports have been included, prevented flood damages of an estimated $8,005,000 during this fiscal year. Total flood damages prevented through September 30, 1981 are $638,279,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Preliminary surveys and plans are complete for a number of projects included in comprehensive plan. Status of projects selected for construction under this authorization is given in individual reports. 24. SHENANGO RIVER LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA. AND OHIO Location. Dam is on Shenango River about 0.8 mile above Sharpsville, Pa., and about 33 miles above junction of river with Mahoning River, which unite near New Castle, Pa., to form Beaver River. Reservoir is in Mercer County, Pa., and Trumbull County, Ohio. (See Geological Survey Chart for Kinsman, Ohio, and Shenango, Pa.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control, low-flow augmentation and recreation. Dam consists of a concrete gravity structure with gate-controlled outlet works and an uncontrolled center spillway section. For further project description, see Annual Report for 1962, page 1230. Project was authorized by 1938 Flood Control Act. (See Table 26-A for project costs.) Current estimate of recreation and sanitary facilities required to upgrade areas and comply with sanitary codes is $2,357,000. Local cooperation. None required by law. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: A contract was awarded on June 24, 1981 in the amount of $250,300 for Hazardous Waste Disposal and Site Clean-up and was 100% complete on Aug. 3, 1981. Lab work, necessary for determining if any contamination resulted from buried materials, is scheduled to be completed by October 16, 1981 and an evaluative report is expected to be received from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency by the end of November 1981. Follow-up work, if any, will be performed after lab results are evaluated. A contract for Resurfacing Parking Lot was awarded Sept. 18, 1981 in the amount of $30,956.70 and is scheduled to be completed by November 13, 1981. Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control and low-flow augmentation, as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir for this period were $1,695,000. Total flood control benefits for this dam through September 30, 1981 are $14,124,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management and operation and maintenance of public-use facilities continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Authorized project is complete. Reservoir is in operation for low-water regulation purposes in Shenango River valley below and for flood control as a unit of a coordinated reservoir system for protection of Shenango River valley and the Beaver and upper Ohio River valley, generally. Construction of dam was started in March 1963 and completed in May 1965. Land acquired for project consists of 14,632.2 acres in fee and easements over 197.7 acres. Future work consists of completion of project lands of any additional recreation facilities as required to serve the public needs. 25. STONEWALL JACKSON LAKE, W. VA. Location. In Lewis County, North Central West Virginia, on the West Fork River, which joins the Tygart River at Fairmont, West Virginia to form the Monongahela River. Damsite is located at Brownsville, West Virginia, about 4 miles south of Weston and 72 miles above mouth of West Fork River. at Fairmont, W. Va. (See Geological Survey Charts for Weston and Crawford, W. Va.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a reservoir for flood control, water supply, water quality control, area redevelopment and recreation. Dam would be of the concrete gravity type, 95 feet high and 620 feet long. Outlet works will consist of five multi-level sluices, spillway will be uncontrolled. Storage capacity will be 74,650 acre-feet controlling an area of 102 square miles. Project was authorized by 1966 Flood Control Act. Estimated initial Federal cost for new work (1981) is $201',000,000 (includes $16,135,000 reimbursement by non- Federal interests.) Local cooperation. Local interests are required to make arrangements for repayment, under the provisions of the Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, of that part of the construction cost and annual operation, maintenance and replacement costs allocated to municipal and industrial water supply, an amount presently estimated at $4,300,000 for construction; and $12,300 annually for operations, maintenance and replacements. Also, in accordance with Federal Water Project Recreation Act, local interests are required to administer project land and water areas for recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement, pay, contribute in kind or repay (which may be through 26-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 user fees) with interest, one-half of the separable first cost of the reservoir project allocated to recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement, an amount presently estimated at $11,835,000; bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of recreation and fish and wildlife land and facilities, the amount involved being currently estimated on an average annual basis to be $200,000, exercise to the full extent of their legal capability, control against removal of streamflow made available for water quality control; and contribute to the control of pollution of streams subject to low-flow augmentation by adequate treatment or other methods of controlling wastes at their source. The requirements of Section 221 were amended in 1971 to exempt assurances for future demands for water supply pursuant to the Water Supply Act of 1958 from the contractual requirements of the Act. Accordingly, the City of Weston, West Virginia, has provided assurances that it will enter into a water supply contract with the Department of the Army within a period of time which will permit paying out the costs allocated to the water supply storage within the life of the project. A recreation costsharing contract, in accordance with the requirements of the Federal Water Project Recreation Act, P.L. 89-72, was executed by the State of West Virginia on March 27, 1977. Local cooperation assurances for recreation cost-sharing were executed by the Governor and Attorney General of West Virginia on May 29, 1973. In this connection, Section 8 of P.L. 92-222 deleted the requirement that the State of West Virginia "hold and save the United States free from damages resulting from water rights claims due to construction and operation of the project." Legislation relieving Stonewall Jackson Lake, W. Va. project of the requirements of Section 221, P.L. 96-611 was contained in Water Resources Development Act of 1974 signed by the President on March 7, 1974. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Costreimbursable contract for relocation, rearrangement and alteration of certain gas pipeline facilities, Jarvis Farm Meter Station, Machine Shop and Warehouse, and telephone facilities awarded August 14, 1979 progressed to 85% completion. Estimated cost is $5,000,000 and scheduled completion date is February 1982. Contract awarded Nov. 26, 1979 for construction of replacement compressor station at a cost of $7,735,560 progressed to 85% completion and scheduled completion date is Dec. 31, 1981. A F.E.R.C. permit was issued to Equitable Gas Company (contractor) on Sept. 29, 1980 for construction of the compressor station and pipeline facilities. Four separate utility contracts were awarded in fiscal year 1981 for relocation of certain telephone/pipeline facilities to accommodate the Stonewall project - Rt. 19, Section 1, and all four contracts were physically completed in current fiscal year. Additionally, two separate utility contracts were awarded in fiscal year 1981 for relocation of certain pipeline/power facilities to accommodate the Stonewall project - Rt. 19, Section 2, and both are scheduled for completion in the early part of fiscal year 1982. Furthermore, a contract was awarded on March 26, 1981 for Cemetery Relocation, Brownsville Cemetery and work was 100% complete on August 15, 1981 at a final cost of $93,678; a contract for Relocation of 2 - 16" Pipelines at Proposed New Compressor Station was awarded May 1, 1981 at a cost of $173,185 and progressed to 95% completion with a scheduled completion date of Dec. 31, 1981. Land acquisition and detailed engineering work continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Funds to initiate preconstruction planning were appropriated in FY 1968 and for land acquisition in FY 1970. The FY 1970 funds were placed in budgetary reserve and allotted in FY 1971. Funds to initiate construction were appropriated in FY 1971. Environmental impact statement (EIS) was filed with CEQ on November 12, 1971. On July 11, 1974 the Upper West Fork River Watershed Association filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of W. Va. seeking an injunction against further prosecution of the project based primarily on alleged inadequacy of the project EIS. On May 3, 1976 the Federal District Court entered judgment for the Government and dismissed the action by the West Fork Watershed Association. The plaintiff appealed the decision and the appeal was argued before the U.S. Court of Appeals (Fourth Circuit) on January 13, 1977. On January 9, 1978 the U.S. Supreme Court denied the Association's Petition for Certiorari. A public meeting was held in Weston, W. Va. on June 13, 1977 to explain land acquisition policies and procedures. The provisions of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act were met by a Section 404(b)(1) evaluation. The preliminary evaluation was completed in the third quarter FY 1979 which indicated no significant adverse impacts from the placement of fill into the waters of the United States in conjuction with the project construction. The District Engineer sent out a Public Notice and requested State Water Quality Certification under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act in August 1979. Water quality certification was received from State of W. Va. on July 21, 1980 and final Section 404(b)(1) evaluation was signed by the District Engineer on October 21, 1980. Relocation of Route 19, Section 1, was delayed for more than a year because of a lawsuit filed by J.F. Allen Co. challenging the propriety of using SBA's 8(a) program to procure the construction. On September 22, 1981, SBA released procurement from the 8(a) program. Plans and specifications will be furnished to potential bidders in October 1981 with a construction award anticipated to be made in December 1981. Land acquisition, detailed engineering work and construction progressing on schedule; a total of 594 tracts of an estimated 1,100 tracts required for the project have been acquired. 26. TIONESTA LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA. Location. Dam is on Tionesta Creek, 1.25 miles above junction of creek with Allegheny River at Tionesta, Pa., and about 78 miles northeast of Pittsburgh, Pa. Reservoir is entirely in Forest County, Pa. (See Geological Survey Charts for Tionesta, Tidioute and Sheffield, Pa.) Existing project. A flood control reservoir dam of earthfill type with separate uncontrolled saddle spillway and tunnel outlet-works. Project was authorized by Flood Control Acts of 1936 and 1938. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1203. (See Table 26-A for project costs.) Current estimate for construction of recreation and sanitary facilities required to upgrade areas and comply with sanitary codes is $1,571,000. Local cooperation. None required by law. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Plans and specifications for restroom, water supply, electric service and site improvement at Spillway Boat Launch area were 99% complete at end of fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Plans and specifications for replacing windows, screens, heating system in dam tower and repairing cracked bricks were initiated and progressed to approximately 35% completion. Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control and low-flow augmentation, as required, and necessary repiars were made to structures and appurtenances. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir for this period were $5,830,000. Total flood control benefits for this reservoir through September 30, 1981 are $158,467,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management and operation and maintenance of public-use facilities continued. 26-10 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT Condition at end of fiscal year. Authorized project is complete. Reservior is in operation as a unit of a coordinated reservoir system designed for protection of Pittsburgh and reduction of flood heights in upper Ohio Valley, generally. Construction of dam was started in May 1938 and completed January 1941. Land acquired for project consists of 2,797.3 acres in fee and easements over 13.1 acres. Future work consists of provision of project lands of additional recreational facilities as required to serve public needs. 27. UNION CITY DAM, PA. Location. In Erie County, northwestern Pennsylvania, on French Creek, a tributary of Allegheny River. Damsite is 24 miles upstream from Cambridge Springs, Pa., and 41 miles upstream from Meadville, Pa. (See Geological Survey Chart for Union City, Pa. - N.Y.) Existing project. A flood control reservoir dam of earth embankment nongated type with uncontrolled side-channel spillway. Outlet works consist of a lower outlet located in valley floor constructed of reinforced concrete conduit 8 feet by 4.5 feet and an upper outlet consisting of an uncontrolled slot 9.5 feet wide through the north end of the ogee weir in the spillway. Dam is 1,420 feet long at top rising 88 feet above streambed and provides gross capacity of 47,640 acre-feet from a drainage area of 222 square miles. Project was modified to provide for a conservation pool and addition of recreation facilities. On November 5, 1974, a referendum proposal was defeated by the constituents of Erie County in regard to the cost-sharing for construction of recreation facilities. In view of the foregoing, all action toward implementation of the authorized project modification was discontinued. Reservoir is operated as one of a three-reservoir system for reduction of flood stages in French Creek Basin between damsite and mouth, Allegheny River from Franklin, Pa., to Pittsburgh, Pa., inclusive, and upper Ohio River Valley. Existing project was authorize'd by 1962 Flood Control Act. (See Table 26-A for project costs.) Current cost estimate for sanitary facilities required to upgrade area and comply with sanitary code is $170,000. Local cooperation. Local interests are required to inform affected interests in French Creek Basin at least annually, that the system of reservoirs of which Union City Dam is a part, will not provide protection against maximum floods. November 10, 1964 the Department of Forests and Waters of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania furnished formal assurances of local cooperation in respect to notifying local interests at least annually that the system of reservoirs will not provide protection against maximum floods. A referendum on the ballot during the November 1974 election regarding the approval to cost-share the maintenance of a summer pool was defeated by the local voters. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Maintenance of the structure and appurtenances was performed as required. This dam acted as an uncontrolled detention type dam during the fiscal year. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir for this period were $2,110,000. Total flood control benefits for this reservoir through September 30, 1981 are $9,244,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Initial highway relocations were completed in October 1968 and remaining highway relocations were completed in May 1972. Construction of the dam was started in July 1968 and completed in September 1971. Land acquired for project consists of 465.2 acres in fee and easements over 2,154.6 acres. 28. WOODCOCK CREEK LAKE, PA. Location. In Crawford County, northwestern Pennsylvania, on Woodcock Creek, a tributary of French Creek. Damsite is about 4.1 miles above mouth of Woodcock Creek and about 5 miles northeast of Meadville, Pa. (See Geological Survey Chart for Meadville, Pa.) Existing project. A flood-control reservoir dam of rolled-earth embankment type, gate-controlled outlet works with a 6 footwide by 7.75 foot-high conduit and uncontrolled saddle spillway on the left abutment. Dam is 4,650 feet long at top rising 90 feet above streambed and provides for gross capacity of 20,000 acrefeet from a drainage area of 46 square miles. Reservoir is operated as one of a three-reservoir system for reduction of flood stages in French Creek Basin between damsite and mouth, Allegheny River from Franklin, Pa., to Pittsburgh, Pa., inclusive, and upper Ohio River Valley. Project was authorized for flood control and recreation by 1962 Flood Control Act. Storage for water quality control was added to the project during the preconstruction planning stage. (See Table 26-A for project costs.) Current estimate for construction of sanitary facilities, required to comply with state sanitary codes, at completed project is $1,801,000. Local cooperation. Local interests must inform affected interests in French Creek Basin at least annually, in a manner satisfactory to District Engineer, that a system of reservoirs of which Woodcock Creek Lake is a part, will not provide protection against maximum floods. Pennsylvania Department of Forests and Waters assumed responsibility of local cooperation for project. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Maintenance of the structure and appurtenances was performed as required. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir for this period were $208,000, total through September 30, 1981 is $1,190,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Authorized project is complete. Reservoir is in operation for reduction of flood stages in French Creek Basin between damsite and mouth, Allegheny River, from Franklin, Pa. to Pittsburgh, Pa., inclusive, and upper Ohio River Valley. Construction of dam was started in July 1970 and completed in July 1973. Land acquired for project consists of 1,733.2 acres in fee and easements over 1.2 acres. 29. YOUGHIOGHENY RIVER LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA. AND MD. Location. Dam is on Youghiogheny River about 74.2 miles above its junction with Monongahela River at McKeesport, Pa. It is 1.2 miles upstream form Confluence, Pa., and about 57 miles southeast of Pittsburgh, Pa. Reservoir is in Fayette and Somerset Counties, Pa., and Garrett County, Md. (See Geological Survey Charts for Confluence, Pa., Accident, Md., West Virginia and Pennsylvania.) Existing project. Reservoir for flood control, navigation aid, and pollution abatement purposes. Dam is rolled-earthfill type with separate uncontrolled side channel spillway and tunnel outlet works. Project was selected for construction under general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1223. (See Table 26-A for project costs.) Current estimate of recreation and sanitary facilities at completed project is $3,198,000. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Plans and specifications for constructing sanitary facilities at Outflow Camp Area, below dam, were initiated and approximately 90% complete at end of fiscal year. A contract for Sanitary Sewer Tie-in was awarded May 27, 1981 in the amount of $28,085 and was 100% complete in August 1981. Operation and maintenance, general: Contract for paving access road and parking area at Somerfield Recreation Area-South was awarded 26-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 July 20, 1981 and 100% complete on August 25, 1981 at a final cost of: $43,200. This contract supersedes a contract offered to an SBA 8(a) contractor on Aug. 27, 1980. The Small Business administrator cancelled the contract and released it from the 8(a) program as the proposed contractor was unable to provide the necessary performance and payment bonds and distribution of the contract had not been made. Plans and specifications for constructing a Resource Manager's Office were initiated and 90% complete at end of fiscal year. Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control, as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances as required. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir for this period were $2,274,000. Total flood control benefits for this dam through September 30, 1981 are $123,804,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management, and operation and maintenance of public-use facilities were continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Authorized project is complete. Reservoir is in operation for flood control, navigation, and pollution abatement purposes. For flood control, reservoir is operated as a unit of a coordinated reservoir system designed for protection of Pittsburgh and reduction of flood heights in upper Ohio Valley, generally. Construction of dam was started in June 1940 and completed May 1944. Land acquired for project consists of 3,914.9 acres in fee and easements over 0.48 acre. A license was issued Commonwealth of Pennsylvania covering fish conservation and management in Pennsylvania portion of reservoir. Future work consists of provision on project lands of additional recreational and sanitary facilities as required to serve public needs. 30. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, and subsequent acts require local interests to furnish assurances that they will maintain and operate certain local protection projects after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by Secretary of the Army. District Engineers are responsible for administration of these regulations within boundaries of their respective districts. Inspections were made of completed units transferred to local interests for maintenance and operation and local interests were advised, as necessary, of measures required to maintain these projects in accordance with standards prescribed by regulations. (See Table 26-I for dates of inspections.) Costs for this fiscal year, $44,401. Total cost to September 30, 1981 was $621,928. 31. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See Table 26-J on other authorized flood control projects. 32. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION For flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization) See Table 26-K. For emergency bank protection (Sec. 14 of 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Cong.) See Table 26-K. For Streambank Erosion Control Evaluation and Demonstration Act of 1974 (Sec. 32, Public Law 251, 93rd Cong.) See Table 26-K. For Shoreline Erosion Control Demonstration Act of 1974 (Sec. 54, Public Law 251, 93rd Congress) See Table 26-K. Flood control and coastal emergencies (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation). Advance preparation $ 90,081 Emergency operations 27,188 Rehabilitation work: Brookville, PA 14,759 Total cost for fiscal year: $132,028 General Investigations 33. SURVEYS Flood control studies Coordination with other agencies Supplemental preauthorization studies: Clarion River Basin, Acid Mine Drainage, Phase I Total cost for fiscal year: $ 934,556 7,806 64,896 $1,007,258 34. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Costs this fiscal year were $224,404 for flood plain management services and $19,594 for hydrologic studies. (See Table 26-L Completed Flood Plain Studies.) 35. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT $7,097 was expended this fiscal year for a water resources planning study of Sewickley Creek Watershed. 26-12 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT TABLE 26-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost to Section Sept. 30, In Text Project Funding FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 1981 Navigation - Locks and Dams 1. Allegheny River New Work Pa. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 3. Monongahela New Work River, Pa. and Approp. W. Va. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 5. Tygart Lake, New Work W. Va. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Flood Control - Local Prote< 7. Chartiers Creek, Pa. (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 8. Elkins, W. Va. 9. Girty's Run, Millvale, Pa. (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 10. Johnstown, Pa. 11. Punxsutawney, Ohio River Basin, Pa. 12. Root Creek, Bolivar, N.Y. 13. Tenmile Creek at Marianna, Pa. ction New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost. New Work Approp. Cost - - - 18,157,860' - - - - 18,157,8601 1,846,642 3,027,900 3,093,800 3,419,700 39,638,5622 1,859,428 2,923,387 3,090,667 3,096,229 39,176,4482 2,001,758 1,995,872 5,356,200 5,355,123 6,020,000 5,293,853 5,397,300 5,468,999 5,777,000 5,899,630 5,146,800 4,972,781 - - 60,000 - - 25,078 336,976 394,700 514,600 345,989 400,494 476,838 -550,000 1,484,246 353,809 353,809 9,500 10,893 861,416 70,000 323,405 2,180,000 2,718,722 6,194,000 6,207,403 514,588 129,285 502,800 507,623 -1,135,000 2,299,000 1,602,983 731,949 2,574,399 1,524,356 -123,610 119,906 -17,846 8,600 8,612 1,060,000 369,181 73,900 32,188 75,000 744,510 -156,435 231,451 1,253,000 400,400 1,427,721 400,339 327,600 327,785 32,700 32,951 7,000 7,064 13,400 13,412 25,000 60,324 145,180,0853 144,829,2714 105,022,2145 104,762,2035 19,006,4326 18,586,2077 5,411,839 5,364,929 26,586,183 26,422,430 4,219,967 4,197,949 1,772,627 1,772,627 208,487 202,076 - 3,135,000 28,586 3,100,722 - 701,722 417 701,722 47,000 43,525 5,000 4,856 - 460,000 661,035 251,000 10,956 27,058 727,192 428,012 537,000 275,000 1,085,585 155,990 30,211 68.665 8,865,3888 8,865,3888 3,269,796 3,266,290 3,586,1079 3,586,1079 704,900 704,743 1,502,385 1,310,532 1,556,800 1.543.372 26-13 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 26-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) See Total Cost to Section Sept. 30, In Text Project Funding FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 1981 Flood Control - Reservoirs 14. Berlin Lake Ohio River Basin, Ohio 15. Conemaugh River Lake, Ohio River Basin, Pa. 16. Crooked Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, Pa. 17. East Branch, Clarion River Lake, Ohio River Basin, Pa. 18. Kinzua Dam and Allegheny Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, Pa. and N.Y. 19. Loyalhanna Lake, Ohio River Basin, Pa. 20. Mahoning Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, Pa. 21. Michael J. Kirwan Dam and Reservoir, Ohio 22. Mosquito Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, Ohio New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 3,500 25,000 35,000 -2,889 114,530 4,133 32,764 15,827 697,097 955,390 948,800 1,015,300 783,408 948,498 900,415 984,740 - - - 52,000 - - - 51,566 277,960 355,621 441,300 514,600 288,363 357,207 403,274 508,659 -4,500 114,000 - 18,614 288,405 382,834 294,437 379,493 9,383 109,636 460,500 452,913 - 15,000 - - 14,984 342,524 409,304 411,000 354,281 418,070 402,723 25,000 - -30,378 237,186 4,736 10,904 817,186 692,100 737,100 963,740 673,985 760,141 29,000 104,757 402,158 391,476 437,000 110,108 276,246 277,271 -2,315 677,214 664,317 10,000 37,666 264,206 263,866 -2,331 764,900 711,562 61,000 43,693 346,800 305,466 -1,748 803 753,800 552,917 -16 409,700 455,494 -1,735 5,135 795,600 785,849 15,000 11,422 643,600 705,277 273,706 400,112 487,800 453,571 - - - 21,000 - - - 17,374 442,987 329,174 434,100 480,600 413,717 369,018 390,939 492,385 110,000 114,419 265,154 269,422 5,000 4,648 369,672 378,627 -1,271 - 294,300 421,800 290,850 404,245 26-14 8,742,47810 8,737,214" 8,886,883 8,781,336 45,736,41112 45,735,97713 4,131,713 4,077,332 4,335,02314 4,335,02314 4,508,421 4,291,079 9,539,58515 9,539,58515 3,974,135 3,917,718 109,309,076'6 109,293,917 ' 7 9,056,178 8,983,120 5,577,531 ' 8 5,573,95419 5,388,674 5,364,738 7,313,05120 7,020,07921 4,169,916 4,084,884 47,033 47,033 17,376,09722 17,372,47123 3,818,789 3,781,604 4,253,02924 4,253,02924 3,793,964 3,763,936 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT TABLE 26-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) See Total Cost to Section Sept. 30, In Text Project Funding FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 1981 23. Ohio River Basin, Pittsburgh, Pa. District Consolidated 24. Shenango River Lake, Ohio River Basin, Pa. 25. Stonewall Jackson Lake W. Va. 26. Tionesta Lake Ohio River Basin, Pa. 27. Union City Dam, Pa. 28. Woodcock Creek Lake, Pa. 29. Youghiogheny River Lake, Ohio River Basin, Pa. and Md. New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 985,19725 985,19725 253,300 1,285,048 776,873 762,655 25,153 1,113,297 1,137,310 2,995 1,244,700 1,201,999 8,529 1,632,600 1,551,254 40,227,20126 40,220,32227 8,525,217 8,361,228 5,000,000 9,295,000 12,300,000 15,505,000 46,055,200 3,852,326 10,076,022 11,234,875 15,585,738 44,589,767 210,000 2,448 561,279 624,265 957 221,406 225,969 2,158 254,697 254,648 647,500 735,072 742,726 680,797 240,000 51,291 669,700 683,159 7,000 187,586 708,600 721,146 18,701 25,377 647,600 676,637 205,062 209,200 204,200 205,308 211,746 197,002 - 43,000 - 36,588 335,924 364,900 330,031 368,436 461,000 -71,976 785,803 769,786 -56,004 233,521 937,100 944,663 6,061 383,700 377,938 80,000 263,134 1,004,200 1,050,372 7,196,70628 6,985,75329 6,740,833 6,723,698 14,559,800 14,559,800 1,287,668 1,276,028 18,916,70030 18,916,34931 2,261,771 2,247,232 12,256,26832 12,186,56733 8,681,589 8,648,350 1. Includes $2,453,737 from emergency relief funds and $1,250,049 from public works funds. 2. Includes $64,354 public works acceleration, executive funds (1963). 3. Includes $5,420,541 for new work for previous projects and $15,977,000 for major rehabilitation (1978-1981). 4. Includes $5,420,541 for new work for previous projects and $15,628,965 for major rehabilitation (1978-1981). 5. Includes $22,549 public works acceleration, executive funds (1963) and $742 for maintenance for previous project. 6. Includes $1,999,995 emergency relief funds, $10,000,000 public works funds, $51,000 Code 711 funds and $523,588 Code 713 funds. 7. Includes $1,999,995 emergency relief funds, $10,000,000 public works funds, $50,680 Code 711 funds and $483,843 Code 713 funds. 8. Includes $33,423 from emergency relief funds. 9. Excludes $180,485 for new work expended from contributed funds. 10. Includes $1,545,000 Code 711 funds, $99,111 Code 713 funds; excludes $100,000 contributed by local interest. 11. Includes $1,539,727 Code 711 funds, $99,111 Code 713 funds; excludes $100,000 contributed by local interest. 12. Includes $5,351 from emergency relief funds and $52,000 Code 711 funds. 13. Includes $5,351 from emergency relief funds and $51,566 Code 711 funds. 14. Includes $63,788 from emergency relief funds and $130,134 Code 711 funds. 15. lncludes $156,812 Code 711 funds. 16. Includes $2,791 from emergency relief funds, $14,622 Code 711 funds and $570,358 Code 713 funds; excludes $389,370 contributed by local interest. 17. Includes $2,791 from emergency relief funds, $14,622 Code 711 funds and $566,177 Code 713 funds; excludes $389,370 contributed by local interest. 18. Includes $7,339 from emergency relief funds and $124,670 Code 711 funds. 19. Includes $7,339 from emergency relief funds and $121,092 Code 711 funds. 20. Includes $25,671 emergency relief funds, $132,221 Code 711 funds and $759,485 Code 713 funds; excludes $354,791 contributed by local interests. 21. Includes $25,671 emergency relief funds, $132,221 Code 711 funds and $466,513 Code 713 funds; excludes $354,791 contributed by local interests. 22. Includes $74,900 Code 711 funds; excludes $4,258,988.80 for new work contributed by local interest. 23. Includes $71,274 Code 711 funds; excludes $4,258,988.80 for new work expended from contributed funds. 24. Includes $122,729 Code 711 funds and $94,900 Code 713 funds. 25. Includes $8,914 from emergency relief funds. 26. Includes $1,730,100 Code 711 funds and $1,618,300 Code 713 funds. 27. Includes $1,730,096 Code 711 funds and $1,618,300 Code 713 funds. 28. Includes $1,707,405 Code 711 funds, $275,900 Code 712 funds and $24,201 emergency relief funds. 29. Includes $1,496,451 Code 711 funds, $275,900 Code 712 funds and $24,201 emergency relief funds. 30. Includes $43,000 Code 711 funds. 31. Includes $42,649 Code 711 funds. 32. Includes $2,581,364 Code 711 funds. 33. Includes $2,511,664 Code 711 funds. 26-15 - REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 26-B Acts Aug. 5, 1886 June 3, 1896 July 25, 1912 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935' Aug. 30, 1935' June 26, 19342 Mar. 3, 1899 June 13, 1902 Mar. 3, 1905 Mar. 3, 1905 Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 4, 1913 Sept. 22, 1922 July 3, 1930 Jan. 31, 19313 June 26, 19342 Documents 26-16 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized ALLEGHENY RIVER, PA. (See Section 1 of Text) For lock and dam 1. (Fixed dam contemplated. Sept. 29, 1891 Secretary of War authorized change to a movable dam.) For locks and dams 2 and 3. For locks and dams 4 to 8, inclusive. For a depth of 9 feet in the lower 61 miles. Replace lock and dam 1 by a dredged channel, 9 feet deep and 200 feet wide up to lock 2, and construct new locks and dams 2 and 3, to replace existing locks and dams 2 and 3. Construct lock and dam 9, raising crest of dam 8, and dredging a navigable channel in head of pool 8. Operation and care of locks and dams provided for with funds from War Department appropriation for rivers and harbors. MONONGAHELA RIVER, PA. AND W. VA. (See Section 3 of Text) Enlarge and improve lock and dam 6; additional works at lock 3; new repair steamer and new dredge boat with equipment; all at an estimated cost of $185,556. Rebuild lock and dam 2 at estimated cost of $655,961. (Estimate increased in 1910 to $698,961.) Acquisition of land and additional improvements at 5 and 6 at a cost of $7,850. Rebuild lock and dam 3 at estimated cost of $589,196. Reconstruct lock and dam 5 at estimated cost of $756,042. Reconstruct lock and dam 6 at estimated cost of $356,400. (Estimate increased in 1916 to $418,860.) Additional improvements at estimated cost as follows: Guide walls and guard walls, 1 to 6, $1,255,130; Lengthen land chamber of lock 3 to 720 feet, $787,722; New chamber (360 feet long), lock 4, $699,786; Lock and dam 7, $1,161,241; Lock and dam 8, $1,165,758; Lock and dam 7 (second chamber), $419,126; Lock and dam 8 (second chamber), $504,465; Reconstruct dam 4, $397,211; Marine ways, repair plant, office and warehouse, $250,000, for a total of $6,640,439. Construct new locks and dam 2.5 miles below existing structure, at estimated cost of $2,175,000 in lieu of work authorized at old lock and dam 4. Chief of Engineers authorized to locate new locks and dam 4 above existing structure and on such site as they may deem most desirable. Operation and care of locks and dams provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors. Annual Report 1886, p. 1545, Annual Report 1891, p. 2366 H. Doc. 204, 54th Cong., 1st sess., and Annual Report 1896, p. 2212 H. Doc. 540, 62d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 356, 71st Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee, Doc. 16, 72d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 721, 71st Cong., 3d sess., and Rivers and Harbors Committee, Doc. 27, 73d Cong., 2d sess. Annual Report 1897, p. 2423 Annual Report 1909, p. 1756 Annual Report 1904, p. 460 H. Doc. 209, 58th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 209, 58th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 1217, 62d Cong., 3d sess. H. Doc. 288, 67th Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee, Doc 22, 70th Cong., 2d sess. PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT TABLE 26-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Acts Work Authorized Documents May 17, 1950 Aug. 28, 1937 June 28, 1938 Aug. 18, 1941 Dec. 22, 1944 July 24, 1946 May 17, 1950 Dec. 30, 1963 June 18, 1965 May 12, 1967 Aug. 13, 1968 June 19, 1970 March 7, 1974 Oct. 22, 1976 Nov. 16, 1977 S. Doc. 100, 81st Cong., 1st sess. Modification of existing project as follows: Provide 2 new locks and dams similar to Morgantown lock and dam to replace existing locks and dams 12 to 15, inclusive. Provide a movable crest on existing dam 8 to raise existing pool-full elevation 4 feet. Provide a navigation channel of 300-foot minimum bottom width and a 9-foot project depth above lock and dam 8. Provide an extension of navigable channel of upper Monongahela River, into lower Tygart River for 2.1 miles at a maximum bottom width of 200 feet and a 9-foot project depth. OHIO RIVER BASIN - Pittsburgh District (See Section 23 of Text) Construct levees, floodwalls, and drainage strhctures for protection of cities and towns in Ohio River Basin. Projects to be selected by Chief of Engineers with approval of Secretary of War at a cost not to exceed $24,877,000 for construction. Approved general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in Ohio River Basin as may be advisable in discretion of Secretary of War and Chief of Engineers, and for initiation and partial accomplishment of plan, authorized $75 million for reservoirs and $50,300,000 for local flood protection works. Additional $45 million for prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Additional $70 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin, including additional projects in tributary basins. Additional $125 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan including additional projects in tributary basins. Additional $100 million for prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. H. Doc. 762, 77th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 506, 78th Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 88-253, 88th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc., 6755, 89th Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 90-17, 90th Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 90-483, 90th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 15166, 91st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 10203, 93rd Cong., River Basin Monetary Authorization Act of 1974. Water Resources Development Act of 1976; Public Law 94-587, Sec. 101(a). S. Doc. 2281, 95th Cong., 1st sess. 1. Included in the Emergency Relief Administration program April 8, 1935. 2. Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. 3. Public Res. 117, 71st Cong., 3d sess. 26-17 Flood Control Committee, Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. Flood Control Committee, Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. Additional $150 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in Ohio River Basin. Additional $89 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Additional $38 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Additional $35 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Additional $69 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Additional $120 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Authorized phase I design memorandum stage of advanced engineering and design of the project for abatement of acid mine drainage in the Clarion River Basin, Pa. Additional $18 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. 1. Included in the Emergency Relief Administration program April 8, 1935. 2. Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. 3. Public Res. 117, 71st Cong., 3d sess. 2 17 TABLE 26-C ALLEGHENY RIVER, PA.: LOCKS AND DAMS (See Section 1 of Text) Dimensions Upper Avail- Normal Depths on Miter Width able Lift at Pool Sills at Normal Character of Type of Year of Length Normal Elevation Pool Level' Foundation Construction Per- Opened Miles Cham- to Full Pool (feet, cent to Above ber Width Level mean sea Lower Upper Kind of Com- Navi- No. Mouth Nearest Town (feet) (feet) (feet) level) (feet) (feet) Lock Dam Dam Lock Dam plete gation Actual Cost 2 6.7 Aspinwall, Pa. 3 14.5 Cheswick, Pa. 4 24.2 Natrona, Pa. 5 30.4 Freeport, Pa. 6 36.3 Clinton, Pa. 7 45.7 Kittanning, Pa. 8 52.6 Templeton, Pa. 9 62.2 Rimer, Pa. Total Abandoned lock and dam 1 Abandoned lock and dam 2 Abandoned lock and dam 3 Demolishing old dam 1 Dredging channel Total 56 56 56 56 56 56 360 360 360 360 360 360 11.0 721.0 13.5 734.5 10.5 745.0 11.8 756.8 12.2 769.0 13.1 782.1 12.0 10.9 Rock Rock Fixed Concrete Concrete 10.8 11.8 Rock Pile-rock Fixed Concrete Concrete 10.0 8.5 Rock Rock Fixed Concrete Concrete 10.5 10.3 Piling Crib-Pile Fixed Concrete Concrete 10.6 10.8 Rock Crib-Pile Fixed Concrete Concrete 9.8 10.9 Piling Steel Sheet Fixed Concrete Concrete Piling 56 360 17.9 800.0 10.4 13.8 Rock Rock Fixed Concrete Concrete 56 360 22.0 822.0 10.5 11.3 Rock Rock Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 1934 $ 1,763,485 100 19342 1,875,665 100 1927 1,707,690 100 1927 1,940,537 100 1928 1,523,959 100 1930 1,460,008 100 1931 100 1938 2,848,920 2,510,373 $15,630,637 591,187 544,929 310,103 26,001 1,055,003 $18,157,860 1. All depths as shown are on guard sills and are controlling depth. 2. Dates shown represent replacement structures. C 00y O z 0J) ID 0Z 00 TABLE 26-D MONONGAHELA RIVER, PA. AND W. VA.: LOCKS AND DAMS (See Section 3 of Text) Dimensions Upper Avail- Normal Depths on Miter Width able Lift at Pool Sills at Normal Character of Type of Year of Length Normal Elevation Pool LeveP Foundation Construction Per Opened Miles Cham- to Full Pool (feet, cent to Above ber Width Level mean sea Lower Upper Kind of Corn- Navi- Estimated or No. Mouth Nearest Town (feet) (feet) (feet) level) (feet) (feet) Lock Dam Dam Lock Dam plete gation Actual Cost 2 11.2 Braddock, Pa. 3 23 8 Elizabeth, Pa. 4 41 5 Monessen, Pa. 61.2 Maxwell locks and dam. Maxwell, Pa. 82.2 Grays Landing lock and dam, Grays Landing, Pa. 7 85.0 Greensboro, Pa. 8 90.8 Point Marion, Pa. 102.0 Morgantown lockand dam, Morgantown, W. Va. 108.0 Hildebrand lock and dam, 6 miles above Morgantown, W. Va. 115.4 Opekiska lock and dam, 13.4 miles above Morgantown, W. Va. Marine ways, etc. Abandoned lock and dam 1 Abandoned lock and dam 4 Abandoned lock and dam 5 Abandoned lock and dam 6 Abandoned lock and dam 7 Abandoned lock and dam 8 Abandoned lock and dam 9 Abandoned lock and dam 10 Abandoned lock and dam 11 Abandoned lock and dam 12 Abandoned lock and dam 13 Abandoned lock and dam 14 Abandoned lock and dam 15 Dredging Total 56 110 563 563 84'3 360 8 7 718.7 16.0 15.95 Rock 720 360 8.2 726.9 16.0 15.95 Rock 720 360 16.6 743.5 10.7 20.0 Piles 720 720 19.5 763.0 15.0 20.5 Rock 84 720 15.0 778 0 15.0 26.0 Rock 56 56 84 360 360 600 15.0 778.0 10.0 10.5 Rock 19.0 797.0 10.0 14.5 Rock 17.0 814.0 14.5 178 Rock 84 600 21.0 835.0 15.0 14.0 Rock 84 600 22.0 857.0 140 17.75 Rock Crib pile Fixed Concrete Crib pile Fixed Concrete Piles Movable Concrete Rock Movable Concrete Concrete 100 19533 Concrete 100 1953 Concrete 100 1932'2 Concrete 100 1964 Rock Fixed Concrete Concrete Rock Fixed Concrete Rock Movable Concrete Rock Movable Concrete Rock Movable Concrete Rock Movable Concrete Concrete 100 1925' Concrete 100 1925'2 Concrete 100 1950 Concrete 100 1959 Concrete 100 1964 1 All depths as shown are on guard sills and are controlling depths 2 Dates shown for locks and dams Nos 2 to 8, inclusive, represent reconstruction 3 2 Chambers 4 Includes $3,322,057 for raising crest of dam, (1958-9), $2,086,438 for original reconstruction (1923-1926) and an estimated $56,300,000 for replacement of lock; excludes $200,000 estimated non-Federal costs 5 Actual cost; may include estimated costs which have been footnoted as necessary 6 Includes $2,173,767 for original reconstruction, (1931-2), and $15,080,304 for reconstruction of dam, (1977) 7 Includes $16,967,114 for reconstruction of locks 8 Includes estimated $15,977,000 for major rehabilitation 9 Current cost estimate excluding $230,000 estimated non Federal costs $17,872,2125 17,658,538$ 17,254,071' 30,110,8895 86,200,000' 2,639,8045 61,708,495' 8,778,0005 12,506,8295 25,179,6225 250,000 1,019,907' 780,816' 1,074,812' 770,449 ' 213,776 245,900 ' 191,0005 210,4455 227,6685 200,5505 190,691' 210,1275 175,829' 587,8995 286,258,329 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 26-E MONONGAHELA RIVER, PA. AND W. VA.: TOTAL COSTS OF EXISTING PROJECT TO END OF FISCAL YEAR (See Section 3 of Text) Operation and Maintenance, Funds New Work General Total Regular $139,408,730' $84,142,3252 $223,551,055' 2 Maintenance and operation - 150,000 150,000 Public Works acceleration, executive (1963) - 22,549 22,549 Total $139,408,730' $84,314,8742 $223,723,604' 2 1. Excludes $5,420,541 for new work for previous projects. TABLE 26-F OTHER AUTHORIZED 2. Excludes $20,446,587 expended between July 7, 1897 and June 30, 1937, on operation and care of works of improvement under provisions of permanent appropriation for such purposes and excludes $742 for maintenance of previous projects. NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Section 6 of Text) For Last Cost to September 30, 1981 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Allegheny River, Pa., open-channel work 1934 197,000 133,840' Beaver and Mahoning Rivers, Pa. and Ohio2 1938 - - Buckhannon River, W. Va.3 4 1893 5,500 Cheat River, W. Va.3 " 1895 12,997 - Lake Erie-Ohio Canal, Ohio and Pa.' 1972 1,342,000 Pittsburgh Harbor, Pa. 1922 110,663 81,613' Youghiogheny River, Pa. and Md. 1971 47,1955 185,6686 1. Completed. 3. Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 2. January 23, 1939, Chief of Engineers recommended con- 1st Sess. structing a waterway from Ohio River through Beaver, 4. No Commerce reported. Mahoning, and Grand River Valleys to Lake Erie (H. Doc. 5. Previous project data. 178, 76th Cong., 1st Sess.) 6. Includes $1,700 expended under previous project. 7. Deauthorized by Congress on May 6, 1981. 26-20 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT TABLE 26-G OHIO RIVER BASIN (PITTSBURGH DISTRICT): LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS (See Section 23 of Text) Estimated Cost8 Type of Location' Protection Federal Non-Federal Total Adena, Ohio (Short Creek)2 '6 Allegany, N.Y., unit I (Allegheny River)2 Allegany, N.Y., unit II (Five Mile Creek area)2 Bellaire, Ohio 2 19 Benwood, W. Va.2 7 20 Brackenridge, Tarentum and Natrona, Pa. (Allegheny River)2 Brilliant, Ohio 2 16 Brockway, Pa. (Allegheny River Basin)2 16 Clarington, Ohio2 16 Coraopolis, Pa.2 16 Dillonvale, Ohio (Short Creek)2 16 Elkins, W. Va. (Monongahela River Basin)4 5 Empire-Stratton, Ohio 2 Follansbee, W. Va.2 16 Freeport, Pa. (Allegheny River)2 16 Industry, Pa.2 '6 Johnsonburg, Pa.(Allegheny River Basin)2 5 Johnstown, Pa. (Allegheny River Basin)2 " Kittanning, Pa., part I (Allegheny River)2 5 Kittanning, Pa., part II (Allegheny River)2 17 Lake Chautauqua and Chadakoin River, N.Y. (Allegheny River Basin)2 Latrobe, Pa. (Allegheny River Basin)" 2 Leetsdale, Pa2 Martins Ferry, Ohio 2 6 20 McKees Rocks, Pa.2 18 Mingo Junction, Ohio2 16 Moundsville, W. Va.2 20 Neville Island, Pa.2 New Cumberland, W. Va.2 16 New Kensington and Parnassus, Pa. (Allegheny River)2 Olean, N.Y. (Allegheny River)2" Pittsburgh, Pa. (Golden Triangle)2 18 Pittsburgh, Pa. (North Side)2 18 Pittsburgh, Pa. (The Strip)2 18 Portville, N.Y. (Allegheny River)2 5 Powhatan Point, Ohio 2 20 Proctor, W. Va. 2 Punxsutawney, Pa. (Allegheny River Basin)4 5 Ridgway, Pa. (Allegheny River Basin)2 " Rochester, Pa. 2 St. Marys, Pa. (Allegheny River Basin)2 '6 Smiths Ferry, Pa.2 16 Uniontown, Pa. (Monongahela River Basin)2 18 20 Warwood, W. Va.2 20 Wellsburg, W. Va.2 16 Wellsville, Ohio, sec. 12' Wellsville, Ohio, sec. 112 5 West Bridgewater, Pa.2 16 Wheeling, W. Va. 2 7 20 Channel Levee Channel and levee Wall and levee Wall Wall Wall Wall and levee Wall and levee Wall Channel Channel diversion Internal drainage facilities Wall Wall Wall, levee & channel Wall Channel Wall Wall Channel Channel Levee Wall and levee Wall Wall Wall and levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Wall Levee Wall Wall Wall Levee Levee Levee Channel and levee Channel Wall Channel Wall Channel and wall Wall Wall and levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Wall Wall and levee 26-21 $ 283,000 697,000 980,000 7,660,000 8,500,000 11,800,000 3,240,000 477,000 2,710,000 3,080,000 388,000 1,772,6273 933,000 2,670,000 1,480,000 1,560,000 674,6643 8,865,3883 130,3173 5,940,000 6,640,000 207,6593 1,270,000 8,630,000 5,470,000 1,920,000 3,070,000 3,210,000 2,760,000 7,900,000 3,217,5313 9,390,000 22,400,000 10,700,000 2,070,4843 4,720,000 334,000 3,586,1073 628,888; 3,350,000 559,000 2,120,000 5,820,000 1,740,000 3,270,000 483,9103 157,633; 2,340,000 19,700,000 $ 67,000 65,000 133,000 1,870,000 3,180,000 3,080,000 276,000 167,000 249,000 466,000 58,000 40,000 28,000 232,000 21,000 136,000 130,000 2,000 352,000 1,310,000 44,400 141,000 836,000 197,000 310,000 605,000 1,830,000 421,000 148,000 597,000 429,000 1,760,000 2,560,000 353,000 397,000 121,000 180,4853 72,000 622,000 17,000 229,000 980,000 376,000 1,160,000 113,000 517,000 3,460,000 $ 350,000"' 762,000 ' 12 1,113,000' 3 9,530,000 11,680,0001' 14,880,000 3,516,000 644,000 2,959,000 3,546,000 446,000'" 1,812,627 961,000' 2,902,000 1,501,000 1,696,000 804,664 8,865,3883 132,317 6,292,000 7,950,000" 252,059 1,411,000 9,466,000 5,667,000 2,230,000 3,675,000 5,040,000 3,181,000 8,048,000 3,814,531 9,819,000 24,160,000 13,260,000 2,423,484 5,117,000 455,000 3,766,592" 700,888 3,972,000 576,000 ' 2,349,000 6,800,00014 2,116,000 4,430,000 596,910 157,633 2,857,000 23,160,000'" REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 26-G OHIO RIVER BASIN (PITTSBURGH DISTRICT): (Continued) LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS (See Section 23 of Text) Estimated Cost8 Type of Location' Protection Federal Non-Federal Total Wheeling, W. Va. (North Wheeling)2 20 Wall 11,700,000 2,700,000 14,400,000 Wheeling, W. Va. (Wheeling Island)2 20 Wall and levee 13,300,000 2,470,000 15,770,000 Woodlands, W. Va. 2 20 Levee 206,000 28,000 234,000 1. All projects are on the Ohio River unless otherwise 10. Latest cost estimate revision 1960. noted. 11. Latest cost estimate revision 1965. 2. Also see "Other authorized flood control projects." 12. Latest cost estimate revision 1966. 3. Actual cost. 13. Latest cost estimate revision 1974. 4. Reported in detail in an individual report. 14. Latest cost estimate revision 1977. 5. Completed. 15. Latest cost estimate revision 1978. 6. Reported in detail in Annual Report for 1941. 16. Deauthorized August 5, 1977. 7. Reported in detail in Annual Report for 1954. 17. Deauthorized November 6, 1977. 8. Latest cost estimate revision 1954 unless otherwise 18. Deauthorized October 3, 1978. noted. 19. Deauthorized May 6, 1981. 9. Latest cost estimate revision 1959. 20. Eligible for deauthorization. TABLE 26-H OHIO RIVER BASIN (PITTSBURGH DISTRICT): RESERVOIRS (See Section 23 of Text) Total Estimated Tributary Basin and Reservoir Stream Cost Allegheny: Conemaugh River, Pa.' Conemaugh River $ 45,959,4004 Crooked Creek, Pa.' Crooked Creek 7,155,9004 East Branch Clarion River, Pa.' Clarion River 9,719,6004 Kinzua Dam and Allegheny Reservoir, Pa. and N.Y.' Allegheny River 115,429,2004 Loyalhanna, Pa.' Loyalhanna Creek 8,014,9004 Mahoning Creek, Pa.' Mahoning Creek 7,711,3004 Tionesta, Pa.' Tionesta Creek 8,037,1004 Union City, Pa.' French Creek 14,729,8004 Woodcock Creek, Pa.' French Creek 20,674,7004 Beaver: Berlin, Ohio' Mahoning River 9,189,4004 Eagle Creek, Ohio2 Eagle Creek 12,700,0003 Michael J. Kirwan, Ohio' Mahoning River 21,754,000" Mosquito Creek, Ohio' Mosquito Creek 6,138,000" Shenango River, Pa. and Ohio' Shenango River 41,528,0004 Monongahela: Youghiogheny River, Pa. and Md.' Youghiogheny River 13,761,300" 1. Reported in detail in an individual report. 5. Includes $6,000,000 cost estimate for Dam Rehabilitation 2. Also see "Other authorized flood control projects." plus $2,236,000 for additional recreational and sanitary 3. Latest cost estimate revision 1954. facilities to upgrade area and comply with sanitary codes. 4. Latest cost estimate revision 1981. 26-22 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT TABLE 26-I INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 30 of Text) Project Dates of Inspection Project Dates of Inspection Amsterdam, Ohio September 1978 Leetonia, Ohio November 1976 Big Run, Pa. August 1978 Oil City, Pa. August 1981 Bradford, Pa. July 1981 Olean, N.Y. September 1980 Brookville, Pa. August 1981 Portage, Pa. May 1979 Buckhannon, W. Va. May 1979 Portville, N.Y. September 1981 Burgettstown-Slovan, Pa. March 1976 Reynoldsville, Pa. August 1977 Butler, Pa. September 1980 Ridgway, Pa. May 1981 Chartiers Creek, Pa. Salamanca, N.Y. September 1981 Cannonsburg-Houston Reach March 1976 Stonewood-Nutter Fort, James G. Fulton Reach March 1976 W. Va. May 1979 Colliers, W. Va. August 1979 Sykesville, Pa. August 1978 Dubois, Pa. September 1977 Tarentum, Pa. November 1976 Eldred, Pa. June 1978 Turtle Creek, Pa. July 1980 Friendsville, Md. May 1981 Washington, Pa. March 1976 Granville, Pa. March 1976 Wellsville, Ohio October 1979 Johnsonburg, Pa. October 1980 Weston, W. Va. May 1979 Kittanning, Pa. None Wilmore, Pa. September 1977 Latrobe, Pa. May 1977 Youngstown, Pa. September 1975 26-23 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 26-J OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (All Projects Not Specifically Identified in Text) For Last Cost to September 30, 1981 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Adena, Ohio" - 13,452 - Allegany, N.Y., unit I (Allegheny River)' - 4,100 - Allegany, N.Y., unit II (Five Mile Creek Area)' 1975 64,851 - Amsterdam, Ohio 4 6 1964 183,072 - Bellaire, Ohio' 8 14 - 76,487 - Benwood, W. Va. 2 8 1954 81,028 Big Run, Pa.4 6 1965 364,208 - Black Fork at Hendricks, W. Va. 6 1972 6,800 - Brackenridge, Tarentum and Natrona, Pa.' - - Bradford, Pa.4 1962 7,601,763 Brilliant, Ohio" - - - Brockway, Pa." - 194 - Brookville, Pa.4 1963 964,976 - Buckhannon, W. Va.3 - 37,488 - Buckhannon, W. Va.4 1972 1,568,661 - Burgettstown, Pa.4 6 - 83,129 - Butler, Pa.4 1970 1,556,181 Clarington, Ohio" - - - Coraopolis, Pa." - - Dillonvale, Ohio" - 16,884 - Dubois, Pa.4 1979 4,461,227 - Eagle Creek Reservoir, Ohio' 8 - 100,000 - Empire-Stratton, Ohio - 33,031 - Follansbee, W. Va." - - Freeport, Pa." - - - Friendsville, Md.4 6 - 41,529 - Granville, Pa.4 6 - 75,908 - Industry, Pa." - - - Johnsonburg, Pa.4 1958 674,664 - Kittanning, Pa., part I4 1949 130,317 - Kittanning, Pa., part II2 - - - Lake Chautaugua and Chadakoin River, N.Y.' 1956 190,722 - Latrobe, Pa.4 1951 207,659 - Latrobe, Pa.4 1970 2,556,652 - Leetonia, Ohio 4 6 - 89,299 - Leetsdale, Pa.' Martins Ferry, Ohio' 8 1941 25,164 - McKees Rocks, Pa. 3 - - Mingo Junction, Ohio" - - Moundsville, W. Va.' 8 - - Muddy Creek Dam, Pa.' 9 '0 1977 402,459 Neville Island, Pa.' New Cumberland, W. Va." - - New Kensington and Parnassus, Pa. - Oakdale, Pa.6 - 14,127 Oil City, Pa.4 6 - 43,595 Olean, N.Y. 1954 3,217,531 Pittsburgh, Pa. (Golden Triangle)'" - - Pittsburgh, Pa. (North Side)'" - - Pittsburgh, Pa. (The Strip) - - Portage, Pa.4 6 1965 150,386 Portville, N.Y.4 1954 2,070,484 26-24 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT TABLE 26-J (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (All Projects Not Specifically Identified in Text) For Last Cost to September 30, 1981 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Powhatan Point, Ohio' 8 - - Proctor, W. Va.' 8- - - Redbank Creek Lake, Pa." - 156,337 Reynoldsville, Pa.4 1959 385,494 - Ridgway, Pa. (Elk Creek)4 1964 628,888 - Ridgway and vicinity, Pa. (on Clarion River)6 10 1979 132,464 - Rochester, Pa.' Rouseville, Pa.6 - 1,642 - Rowlesburg Lake, W. Va.' 9 1977 2,857,575 - Salamanca, N.Y.4 1972 2,880,535 Slovan, Pa.4 6 - 57,811 - Smiths Ferry, Pa." - - - St. Marys, Pa." - 13,529 - Sykesville, Pa.4 6 - 184,246 - Tarentum, Pa.4 6 1964 136,591 - Turtle Creek, Pa.4 1972 15,350,552 - Uniontown, Pa.' 13 1956 - Wallace, W. Va.6 - 11,035 - Warwood, W. Va.' 8 - - - Washington, Pa.4 1964 789,093 - Wellsburg, W. Va.' - 6,387 - Wellsville, Ohio, Sec. I4 1956 483,910 Wellsville, Ohio, Sec. II4 1956 157,633 - West Bridgewater, Pa." - - Wheeling, W. Va. (North Wheeling)' 8 - - Wheeling, W. Va. (Wheeling Island)' 8 - 21,700 - Wheeling, W. Va.' 8 1954 189,067 Wilcox, Pa.5 - 16,761 Wilmore, Pa.4 6 - 96,853 Woodlands, W. Va.' 8 -- - Youngstown, Ohio4 1976 3,621,134 - 1. Inactive. 2. To be restudied. 3. Local interests failed to meet requirements of cooperation, authority for project expired Feb. 20, 1951. 4. Completed. 5. Local interests failed to meet requirements of local cooperation, authority for project expired Mar. 5, 1955. 6. Authorized by Chief of Engineers. 7. Local interests failed to meet requirements of local cooperation, authority for project expired Mar. 2, 1970. 8. Eligible for deauthorization. 9. Lacks local support. 10. No longer economically justified. 11. Deauthorized August 5, 1977. 12. Deauthorized November 6, 1977. 13. Deauthorized October 3, 1978. 14. Deauthorized May 6, 1981. 26-25 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 26-K FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Section 32 of Text) Flood Control Activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization) Project/Study Identification Fiscal Year Costs Allegheny River, Oil City, PA (reconnaisance report and preparation of plans and specifications) $ 39,365 Girty's Run, Millvale, PA (construction) 28,586 Root Creek, Bolivar, NY (construction) 428,012 Tenmile Creek, Marianna, PA (construction) 68,665 West Little Pine Creek, Etna, PA (detailed project report) 36,497 Total cost for current fiscal year: $601,125 Emergency Bank Protection - Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Congress Project/Study Identification Fiscal Year Costs Allegheny River, Wattersonville, PA (plans and specifications) $ 9,819 Craig Beach, OH (construction) 322 Dry Brook, NY (plans, specifications and construction) 4,859 Monongahela River, Newell Borough, PA (construction) 3,799 Ohio River, Chester, WV (reconnaissance report, plans and specifications) 8,507 Ohio River, McMechen, WV (reconnaissance report) 5,000 Roberto Clemente Park, PA (reconnaissance report, plans and specifications) 11,688 Thompson Run, PA (plans and specifications) 6,630 West Butler Creek, Lyndora, PA (reconnaissance report, plans and specifications) 7,073 Total cost for current fiscal year: $57,697 Streambank Erosion Control, Evaluation and Demonstration - Section 32, of the 1974 Water Resources Development Act, Public Law 251, 93rd Congress Project/Study Identification Fiscal Year Costs Ohio River Main Stem Demonstration Projects $55,334 Demonstration Projects at Undesignated Sites 1,830 Total cost for current fiscal year: $57,164 Shoreline Erosion Control Demonstration Section 54, of the 1974 Water Resources Development Act, Public Law 251, 93rd Congress Activity Fiscal Year Costs Architect/Engineer Contract for Preparation of Three Reports for the Purpose of Disseminating Information on the Section 54 Program. $71,002 Three Guides to Low Cost Shore Protection for: 1. Engineers and Contractors 2. Local government officials 3. Property owners TABLE 26-L COMPLETED FLOOD PLAIN STUDIES (See Section 34 of Text) No flood plain studies completed in fiscal year 1981 26-26 ST. PAUL, MINN., DISTRICT* District comprises western Wisconsin, major portion of Minnesota, northern and eastern North Dakota, and small portions of northeastern South Dakota and northern and northeastern Iowa embracing drainage basins of Mississippi River and tributaries from its source to mile 614 above mouth of Ohio River; Red River of the North and tributaries; those streams north of Missouri River Basin in North Dakota; and U.S. waters of Lake of the Woods and its tributaries. That section of Mississippi River above mile 614 is included in report on Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, Minn. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Minnesota River, Minn ....................... 27-2 2. Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, Minn. ....... 27-2 3. Reservoirs at Headwaters of Mississippi River, Minn. ...................... 27-2 4. St. Croix River, Minn. & Wis............... 27-3 5. Warroad Harbor and River, M inn. ........................................ 27-3 6. Other authorized navigation projects .......... 27-3 7. Navigation work under special authorization ................................ 27-3 Flood Control 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. Bassett Creek, Minn .......................... 27-3 Big Stone Lake and Whetstone River, Minn. and S. Dak. ..................... 27-4 Burlington Dam, Souris River, N. Dak........27-4 Chaska, Minn.............. ............ 27-5 Eau Galle River, Wis. ........................ 27-5 Grafton, N. Dak .............................. 27-6 Homme Lake and Dam, N. Dak............... 27-6 Lac qui Parle Lake, Minnesota River, Minn ............................ 27-7 LaCrosse, Wis ................................ 27-7 La Farge Lake and channel improvement, Wis. ............................ 27-7 Lake Ashtabula and Baldhill Dam, Sheyenne River, N. Dak ...................... 27-8 Page 19. Lake Traverse and Bois de Sioux River, S. Dak. and Minn. ..................... 27-8 20. Mankato and North Mankato, Minn. ......... 27-8 21. Minot, N. Dak ................................ 27-9 22. Pembina River, N. Dak.......................27-9 23. Prairie du Chien, Wis. ........................ 27-10 24. Red Lake River, Minn., including Clearwater River, Minn ....................... 27-10 25. Red River of the North drainage basin, Minn., S. Dak. & N. Dak............ 27-10 26. Red River of the North at Oslo, Minn.........27-11 27. Rochester, Minn. ............ ... ........... 27-11 28. Roseau River, Minn. ........................ 27-12 29. Sheyenne River, N. Dak ...................... 27-12 30. State Road and Ebner Coulees, Wis. .......... 27-13 31. Twin Valley Lake, Wild Rice River, Minn .... 27-13 32. Wild Rice River-South Branch and Felton Ditch, Minn............................27-14 33. Winona, Minn .............................. 27-14 34. Inspection of completed flood control projects ............................... 27-15 35. Other authorized flood control projects ....... 27-15 36. Flood control work under special authorization ............ ............... 27-15 General Investigations 37. 38. 39. Surveys .............. ...... ................. 27-15 Collection and study of basic data ............ 27-15 Other work under special authority ........... 27-16 * All cost and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. Navigation 1. MINNESOTA RIVER, MINN. Location. Rises in Big Stone Lake, Minn. and S. Dak., and flows southeasterly about 224 miles to Mankato, Minn., thence northeasterly about 106 miles to join the Mississippi River opposite St. Paul, Minn. (For general location see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Previous projects. For details see page 1890 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1105 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Provides 9-foot depth below flat pool level of Mississippi River lock and dam 2 from mouth to mile 14.7, one-half mile above the railway bridge at Savage, Minn., and 4-foot depth from mile 14.7 to 25.6 at Shakopee, Minn. For details see page 1018 of Annual Report for 1965. (See table 27-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. See also page 1074 of Annual Report for 1967. Terminal facilities. There are privately owned terminals at miles 9, 13.1, 14.5, and two at mile 14.7. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys cost $7,530. Dredging by contract cost $127,623. Snagging and clearing by hired labor cost $1,708. Engineering and administrative costs amounted to $5,317. Condition at end of fiscal year. Work on project for 4-foot depth was completed in 1931. The United States owns 10 acres of land in fee 2 miles east of Savage, Minn. Rights-ofentry have been obtained over 123.08 acres of land over which perpetual easements will be conveyed by local interests. 46.20 acres have been transferred from the Department of the Army and Department of the Air Force to the 27-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 project. Navigation from mouth to Shakopee was practicable for drafts not in excess of 3 feet. A contract for work under 1958 authorization for a 9-foot channel started in May 1966 was terminated in January 1967 when 56 percent complete. A channel dredging contract awarded in June 1967 was completed in August 1968. Total costs for existing project to September 30, 1981 were $3,308,488, of which $1,940,180 was for new work and $1,368,308 for maintenance. In addition, cost from contributed funds was $139,671 for dredging to 9-foot depth under provisions of section 4, River and Harbor Act of 1915, and $219,531 for work done for the State of Minnesota relative to modification of the project. 2. MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS, MINN. For report on this improvement see chapter on Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, Minnesota. 3. RESERVOIRS AT HEADWATERS OF MISSISSIPPI RIVER, MINN. Location. Reservoirs are on the Mississippi River and several of its tributaries in Itasca, Beltrami, Hubbard, Aitkin, Cass and Crow Wing Counties, Minn. (See table 27- C on reservoirs.) Previous projects. For details see page 1888 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1098 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Provides for reconstruction from timber to concrete at Winnibigoshish, Leech Lake, Pokegama, Sandy Lake and Pine River Dams, and construction of a concrete dam at Gull Lake. Pokegama was built on bedrock and the others on pile foundations. A portion of Leech Lake Dam from piers 26 to 39 was replaced with an earth fill. Constructed three dikes at Winnibigoshish, four at Pokegama, two at Sandy Lake, and 16 at Pine River. Sandy Lake Dam includes a lock 160 feet long, 30 feet wide, with a maximum lift of 9.5 feet and a depth of 2.5 feet on lower sill at low water which was converted to use as a spillway. (See table 27-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. None. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Contracts at Pine River for a sewage treatment facility and construction of a comfort station cost $5,874. Miscellaneous costs including purchase of sanitary dump stations at Pokegama Lake and Winnibigoshish Lake and engineering and administrative costs amounted to $8,930. Damages assessed against the contractor for the Pine River sewage treatment facility amounted to $7,155. Maintenance: Reservoirs were operated as required, recreation facilities were maintained, and miscellaneous inspections, repairs, and reports were made by hired labor including administration at a cost of $1,038,914. Contract work for dam operations, recreation and sanitation facilities, archaeology and law enforcement cost $29,534. Stability studies with the Waterways Experiment Station and Missouri River Division cost $14,813 and $7,199 respectively. Foundation testing with the Missouri River Division cost $1,650. A gate repair contract at Pokegama Dam cost $17,353. Work performed by the Hydrologic Engineering Center cost $24,980. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was completed in 1937. Flowage rights were acquired on all lands affected by construction, maintenance, and operation of reservoirs. A total of 1,861 acres in fee and easements on 296,365 acres are owned by the United States. Structures are in fair condition. Recreation facilities for public use are being constructed intermittently at all reservoir areas. (See table 27-C for capacities and costs by reservoir.) 4. ST. CROIX RIVER, MINN. & WIS. Location. From source in northwestern Wisconsin, flows southwesterly and then southerly about 164 miles to Mississippi River at Prescott, Wis., about 41.7 miles below lower Burlington Northern railway bridge, Minneapolis, Minn. For its greater part, forms boundary between Minnesota and Wisconsin. (See Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. Provides for maintenance of a channel, 9 feet in depth and of suitable width from mouth to Stillwater, Minn., 24.5 miles, created by improvement of upper Mississippi River; a channel 3 feet deep at mean low water between Stillwater and Taylors Falls (27.3 miles); improvement of harbor and waterfront at Stillwater; and a smallboat harbor at Hudson, Wis. Estimated (1979) Federal cost of new work is $714,400. Latest authorization (1954) for maintenance work on reach between Stillwater and Taylors Falls is limited to an expenditure not exceeding $5,000 per year. (See table 27-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed portion. For Hudson Harbor, see the annual report of 1970 for requirements. Terminal facilities. At Stillwater there is a concrete paved levee and a piling-and-timber trestle wharf on right bank. At other points along river, landing may be made on banks. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging operations by hired labor cost $3,853 and a reconnaissance study cost $2,337. Administrative and other miscellaneous costs were $1,748. Condition at end of fiscal year. All new work was completed in 1930, except subsequently authorized harbor at Hudson. The United States owns 2.75 acres of land in fee at Taylors Falls and has easements over 7.57 acres of land at Bayport, Minn. Extension to provide a 9-foot channel from mouth to Stillwater was completed August 12, 1938 when full pool at dam 3 of Mississippi River canalization project was reached. Minimum draft from Stillwater to Taylors Falls is about 1 foot at extreme low water, and from mouth to Stillwater, 9 feet. Maintenance of the 3 foot channel is limited to requests by the National Park Service which manages this reach under the Wild and Scenic Waterways classification. 5. WARROAD HARBOR AND RIVER, MINN. Location. At southwestern extremity of Lake of the Woods, 36 miles west of mouth of Rainy River. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14999.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 8 feet deep from landing at Warroad to deep water in lake, channel being 9,200 feet long, 200 feet wide within harbor, and 300 feet wide out in lake; for a turning basin 500 by 900 feet to a depth of 8 feet; and for a pile-brush stone jetty on north side of channel extending from shore 700 feet into the lake. For additional details see page 1027 of Annual Report of 1965. 27-2 ST. PAUL, MINN., DISTRICT Portion of dredging of entrance channel and turning basin to complete project width and depth was considered unnecessary to meet present navigation requirements, and classified inactive was deauthorized on August 5, 1977 under Section 12 of Public Law 93-251. Estimated cost (1954) of this portion was $355,200. (See table 27-B for authorization legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. There is one publicly owned wharf. There are two commercial fish wharves, one of which is served by a spur track, and a number of minor wharves, all privately owned. Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Sounding surveys cost $9,902. Environmental review cost $2,340 by hired labor and $2,688 by other government agencies. Other engineering and administrative costs were $2,319. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete. Prospective jetty completed in 1910 and reconstructed as a rubble mound in 1929 is in good condition. Turning basin at Warroad wharves was completed in 1911, and a channel 200 feet wide and 8 feet deep in 1915. Controlling depth in river channel and lake approach channel was 6 feet below low-water datum for a minimum width of 100 feet. A walkway on the jetty is provided for public use. A revetment wall, constructed under Section 2 of Public Law 269, 69th Congress, in accordance with Article VIII of the Lake of the Woods Treaty, has deteriorated and will require future maintenance. A reconnaissance report is programmed for FY 1982 to identify maintenance alternatives and cost for future repair effort. 6. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS See table 27-D. 7. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION See table 27-E. Flood Control 8. BASSETT CREEK, MINN. Location. In Hennepin County and Minneapolis, Minnesota, on Bassett Creek, a tributary of the Mississippi River. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. The selected plan consists of flood storage in the upper Bassett Creek watershed and a new tunnel in the outlet reach under a highly urbanized area of Minneapolis. Also, floodplain regulations, flood proofing of 24 homes, evacuation of one home, flood insurance, flood forecasting and warning, and recreation trails are included in the plan. The flood storage would generally consist of providing increased temporary inundation on existing golf courses, parks and open space throughout the watershed. The outlet tunnel would be a cooperative venture with the Minnesota Highway Department which has two major highway projects in the area. Estimated Federal cost (1981) for new work is $12,500,000 and $229,000 is to be contributed by local interests. Project was authorized by the 1976 Water Resources Development Act. Local cooperation. See annual report for 1977 for requirements. A local assurance agreement will be required after completion of the Phase II General Design Memorandum. By resolutions approved 12 September 1974, and 31 October 1975, the city of Minneapolis has indicated its willingness and intention to meet the requirements of local cooperation. A letter from the Mayor and President of the City Council of Minneapolis on 29 August 1979 reaffirmed the support of Minneapolis for the authorized project. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning was continued at a cost of $300,621. Condition at end of fiscal year. Preconstruction planning is in progress. 9. BIG STONE LAKE AND WHETSTONE RIVER, MINN. AND S. DAK. Location. On Minnesota River near Ortonville and Odessa, Minn., and Big Stone City, S. Dak., at the outlet of Big Stone Lake and in Big Stone and Lac qui Parle Counties, Minn., and Grant County, S. Dak. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. Provides for a dam and reservoir on Minnesota River above U.S. Highway 75, modification of Big Stone Lake outlet dam and silt barrier, bank stabilization along lower reach of Whetstone River, channel improvement on Minnesota River for 3 miles below outlet control dam at Big Stone Lake along with necessary relocations and acquisition of lands. These improvements would be made for wildlife conservation and development, flood control, and recreation. For additional details see Annual Report for 1970. Estimated Federal cost (1981) for new work is $12,800,000 and $153,000 to be contributed by local interests. Project was authorized by 1965 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 579, 87th Cong., 2d sess., contains latest map; and H. Doc. 193, 88th Cong., 2d sess.). Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1968 for requirements. The project requires sponsorship from both the States of Minnesota and South Dakota. Formal resolution of assurances adopted by the Upper Minnesota River Watershed District on June 10, 1969 and accepted by the District Engineer on November 3, 1969. Formal resolution of assurances adopted by the East Dakota Conservancy Sub-District for South Dakota on October 23, 1969 was furnished on November 18, 1969 and accepted by the District Engineer on November 19, 1969. Supplemental assurances covering the requirements of Public Law 91-646 were provided by the Upper Minnesota Watershed District on 13 August 1974 and by the East Dakota Conservancy Sub- District on 15 April 1976. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Engineering and design cost $101,568, and supervision and administration cost $7,031. Maintenance: Structure was operated and maintained and inspections and evaluations performed at a cost of $97,295. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the new dam above Highway 75 and roads is completed. Surveys for land lines are complete, and the land acquisition program is complete. The first land payment was made on November 28, 1969 and 128 tracts have been purchased. A general plan between the Secretary of the Army and the Secretary of the Interior for administering the use of waters, land, or interests therein has been consummated, and a cooperative agreement between the Corps of Engineers and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service was approved. On March 31, 1975 the Secretary of the Army transferred lands in the project not required for Corps of Engineers operation and maintenance to the Department of the 27-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 Interior. The transfer of property was accepted by the Department of the Interior on May 21, 1975. 10. BURLINGTON DAM, SOURIS RIVER, NORTH DAKOTA Location. In Ward County in northwestern North Dakota above Burlington, N. Dak., on the Souris River. The damsite is north of Burlington about 11/2 miles northwest of the confluence of the Souris and Des Lacs Rivers and about 10 miles above Minot, N. Dak. (For general location see Geological Survey Map of North Dakota.) Existing project. Authorized plan of improvement as modified by the phase I design memorandum provides for a single-purpose flood control reservoir near Burlington on the Souris River; modification of nine fish and wildlife refuge dams including a 4-foot raise of Lake Darling Dam; a diversion tunnel adjoining the Des Lacs River to the Burlington reservoir; improvements at the community of Velva and improvements by local interests in seven subdivision areas between Burlington and Minot and at the community of Sawyer, and regulation of future floodplain land use downstream from the dam site. Estimated Federal cost (1981) for new work is $124,000,000. Project was authorized by 1970 Flood Control Act. (H. Doc. 321, 91st Cong., 2d sess., contains latest published map.) Local cooperation. For the local flood protection works local interests will be required to provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way, including ponding areas and borrow and disposal areas for excavated material determined suitable by the Chief of Engineers and necessary for construction of the project; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction and subsequent operation and maintenance of the project, not including damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; operate and maintain all works after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army; accomplish without cost to the United States all alterations and relocations of utilities, transportation facilities (except railroad bridges), pipelines, and other existing structures and improvements made necessary by construction of the project; and prescribe and enforce regulations to prevent encroachment on ponding areas for interior drainage. If interior drainage ponding areas are impaired, provide substitute storage capacity or equivalent pumping capacity promptly without cost to the United States. For the dam project local interests will be required to construct, operate, and maintain local flood protection works at urban areas below Burlington Dam and outside Minot that would be inundated by the planned flood control release from the Burlington Dam project and that are not to be protected by Federal local flood protection works; prescribe and enforce regulations to prevent encroachment on downstream channel capacities for regulation of the reservoirs; at least annually inform affected interests that the project will not provide complete flood protection; provide guidance and leadership in preventing future development of the floodplain by use of appropriate floodplain management techniques; and adjust all waterright claims resulting from the construction and operation of the project and hold and save the United States free from damages due to such claims. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Preconstruction planning was continued at a cost of $53,971. Condition at end of fiscal year. Preconstruction planning is in progress. Additional authorization required for implementation of recommended plan. 11. CHASKA, MINN. Location. In Carver County in south-central Minnesota on the Minnesota River. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. The plan of improvement consists of a levee and interior drainage works along the Minnesota River and flood diversion channels on Chaska Creek and East Creek at Chaska, together with appropriate floodplain regulation measures. Principal project features include approximately 1.1 miles of upgraded levee, 0.6 miles of new levee, four pumping stations, 0.9 miles of diversion channel on Chaska Creek, and 1.2 miles of flood bypass channel on East Creek. Approximately 1.6 miles of paved recreation trails on top of the levee and around Courthouse Lake are also included in the proposed plan. Estimated Federal cost (1981) for new work is $16,200,000 and $36,000 is to be contributed by local interests. Project was authorized by the 1976 Water Resources Development Act. (H. Doc. 644, 94th Congress, 2d sess., contains latest published map.) Local cooperation. See annual report for 1977 for requirements. A local assurance agreement will be required after completion of the design memorandum. By letter of May 7, 1981, the city of Chaska has indicated its willingness and intention to meet the requirements of local cooperation. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Preconstruction planning was continued at a cost of $248,430. Condition at end of fiscal year. Preconstruction planning is in progress. 12. EAU GALLE RIVER, WIS. Location. At and in vicinity of Spring Valley, Wis., on Eau Galle River 30 miles above its mouth at Chippewa River, and its tributary, Mines Creek, which flows through the village. Spring Valley is about 45 miles east of St. Paul, Minn., and 36 miles west of Eau Claire, Wis. (See Geological Survey map for Wisconsin for general location.) Existing project. Authorized plan of improvement as modified by further studies includes a retarding dam and reservoir on Eau Galle River immediately upstream from Spring Valley, and remedial works on Mines Creek including channel enlargement, a low levee, and a drop structure. Project provides for earth and rock-fill dam, an uncontrolled outlet and an uncontrolled spillway emerging above Mines Creek. See page 1030 of Annual Report for 1965 for further details. Proposed improvements on Burghardt Creek were eliminated. Improvements provide complete protection near Spring Valley for standard project flood, and below that point in decreasing value in proportion to distance from reservoir. Permanent conservation pool will serve a local need for a recreational area. Project was authorized by 1958 Flood Control Act (S. Doc. 52, 84th Cong., 1st sess., contains latest published map.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. See page 1083 of Annual Report for 1967. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Structure and recreation facilities were operated and maintained, and inspection and evaluations were performed at a cost of $177,712. A pool raise study cost $19,542. Appendices master plan and engineering and design for conduit repair cost $9,214 and $69,690 respectively. Con- 27-4 ST. PAUL, MINN., DISTRICT tracts for a pool raise, cultural resource investigation, and conduit repairs, cost $8,692, $15,378 and $180,817, respectively. Administrative and other miscellaneous engineering costs were $64,103. Condition at end of fiscal year. Mines Creek improvements were substantially completed in 1964; minor work was accomplished in 1966. A contract for dam, spillway, and discharge channel, started July 1, 1965, was completed in October 1968. Recreational facilities have been provided. Remedial work to repair eroded gutters and road ditches was completed in September 1973. 13. GRAFTON, N. DAK. Location. In Walsh County in northeastern North Dakota on the Park River, a tributary of the Red River of the North. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of North Dakota.) Existing project. The plan of improvement proposed in the feasibility report is designed to protect present and future development at Grafton from damages due to floods of magnitudes up to and including the standard project flood. The plan consists of an 8.7 mile earthen ring levee completely encircling existing development and sufficient developable lands to accommodate anticipated future growth and development at Grafton. The levee would have an average height of about 8 feet and would cross the Park River in two locations, requiring a gated control structure at each location to prevent flood flows from affecting protected areas. Normal river flows would be allowed to pass as under natural conditions, providing aesthetic and environmental qualities associated with the existing natural environment of the Park River through Grafton and the immediate project area. A 2.9 mile flood bypass channel would be located to the north of and adjacent to the levee, providing sufficient capacity to carry flood flows which would normally pass through the protected area. Estimated Federal cost (1981) for new work exclusive of Phase I costs is $16,700,000 and $159,000 is to be contributed by local interests. Project was authorized by the 1976 Water Resources Development Act. (H. Doc. 645, 94th Congress, 2d sess., contains latest published map.) Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1977 for requirements. A local assurance agreement will be required after completion of the design memorandum. By Resolution No. 685, passed 15 August 1973 by the Grafton City Council, the city has indicated its willingness and intention to meet the necessary requirements of local cooperation. Operations and results during fiscal year. Phase I design memorandum stage of advance engineering and design was continued under the General Investigations program. Condition at end of fiscal year. Phase I design memorandum stage of advance engineering and design is in progress under the General Investigations program. 14. HOMME LAKE AND DAM, N. DAK. Location. Dam is on South Branch of Park River, about 4 miles upstream from Park River, N. Dak., and 62.1 miles above mouth of Park River. South, Middle, and North Branches, headwater streams of Park River, rise in Cavalier County in northeastern North Dakota and flow easterly to an almost common confluence near Grafton, N. Dak., forming main stream which flows easterly 35 miles to join Red River of the North about 35 miles south of the international boundary. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of North Dakota.) Existing project. See page 1285 of Annual Report for 1962. Project was authorized as Park River Reservoir by 1944 Flood Control Act (S. Doc. 194, 78th Cong., 2d sess.), and redesignated Homme Reservoir and Dam by Public Law 435, 80th Congress, 2d session. Latest published map is in project document. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Estimated total costs for all requirements of local cooperation under terms of project authorization, including required non-Federal contributions, are $62,800. In addition, local interests contributed $16,220 for construction of a water supply outlet through dam and incurred other costs of $19,600. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Structure was operated and maintained, and inspections and evaluations performed at a cost of $267,360. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project completed in June 1956 except for additional recreational facilities which have been done intermittently since that time. Construction began in April 1948 and major structures completed in May 1951. Structures are in good condition. Government has acquired 395 acres of land in fee and easements over 7.8 acres of land for project. An additional 6.3 acres of land have been donated for recreational development and 3.75 acres have been acquired due to bank erosion bordering the project. 15. LAC QUI PARLE LAKE, MINNESOTA RIVER, MINN. Location. Works covered by this project lie along Marsh Lake and Lac qui Parle and the Minnesota River between head of Marsh Lake and Granite Falls, Minn. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. See page 1291 of Annual Report for 1962. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Project was operated and maintained, and inspections and evaluation performed at a cost of $187,895. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project has been operated by the Government since transfer from State of Minnesota to the United States in September 1950. The United States owns fee title to 517.62 acres of land and easements on 19,859.47 acres of land. In 1957, 60.1 acres were withdrawn from public lands for use by the Department of the Army. Land acquisition is complete. Construction under present plan of improvement was started in September 1941 and completed in December 1951 except for recreational facilities. All structures are in good condition. 16. LA CROSSE, WIS. Location. In La Crosse County in southwestern Wisconsin on the Mississippi River. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Wisconsin.) Existing project. The plan of improvement consists of seven miles of levee and one mile of street raise, road and rail closure structures, necessary interior drainage collection facilities, floodplain regulation, permanent evacuation and relocation of 40 residential structures and flood proofing several businesses. Also, a paved hiking and bicycling trail would be provided on some portions of the levee system to meet identified recreation demands in the area. Estimated Federal cost (1981) for new work exclusive of Phase I costs is $22,400,000 and $54,000 is to be contrib- 27-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 uted by local interests. Project was authorized by the 1976 Water Resources Development Act. (H. Doc. 598, 94th Congress, 2d sess., contains latest published map.) Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1977 for requirements. A local assurance agreement will be required after completion of the design memorandum. By resolution adopted 21 June 1973 the county of La Crosse has indicated its willingness and intention to meet the requirements of local cooperation. Operations and results during fiscal year. None. Condition at end of fiscal year. Preconstruction planning has not started. 17. LA FARGE LAKE AND CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, WIS. Location. Rises in Monroe County in southwestern Wisconsin and flows south and southwest through Vernon, Richland, and Crawford Counties emptying into Wisconsin River about 16 miles above junction of latter stream with Mississippi River. (For general location see Geological Survey map of Wisconsin.) Existing project. Provides for a dam and impoundment of the Kickapoo River about 1 mile upstream from village of La Farge, operated for flood control, fish and wildlife conservation, general recreation, and a reduction of aggradation downstream from the dam, and supplemental protection at Soldiers Grove and at Gays Mills by means of levees, supplementary channel improvement, and interior drainage facilities. See Annual Report for 1975 for details. Estimated Federal cost (1976) for new work is $55,400,000. Project was authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 557, 87th Cong., 2d sess., contains latest published map.) Local cooperation. None required for construction of La Farge Lake. See page 1087 of Annual Report for 1967 for requirements for local protection works. Local interests have not been requested to furnish assurances. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Land acquisition, engineering and design, relocation utility contracts, and operation and maintenance during construction cost $339,768. Supervision and administration cost $34. Condition at end of fiscal year. General and Real Estate design memorandums and detailed plans for the La Farge Dam and spillway and for relocations have been completed. Land acquisition negotiations began in December 1968. The first land payment was made on January 15, 1969 and the land acquisition program is 80 percent complete. Contracts for excavation of the left abutment, for test wells, and for construction of the outlet works and right abutment have been completed. A study of alternatives has been completed. Funds to complete the authorized project have been withheld and all further construction has been indefinitely suspended. Contracts have been awarded to utility companies to provide for completion of relocation work left partially completed when construction was suspended. Soldiers Grove has begun relocation out of the floodplain area after receiving funds from other agencies. 18. LAKE ASHTABULA AND BALDHILL DAM, SHEYENNE RIVER, N. DAK. Location. Baldhill Dam is on the Sheyenne River, 16 miles upstream from Valley City, N. Dak., and about 271 miles above mouth. Sheyenne River rises in central North Dakota and flows 500 miles generally southeast to enter Red River of the North about 10 miles north of Fargo, N. Dak. (For general location see Geological Survey map of North Dakota.) Existing project. See page 1287 of Annual Report for 1962. Project was authorized by Flood Control Act of 1944 (S. Doc. 193, 78th Cong., 2d sess., contains latest published map). Reservoir above Baldhill Dam was designated as Lake Ashtabula by Public Law 772, 81st Congress, 2d session. Local cooperation. See page 1288 of Annual Report for 1962. Complied with except for construction of Fargo diversion dam and ditch for which assurances furnished by city of Fargo were approved by the Secretary of War on June 26, 1947. Necessity for this feature will be reviewed. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Administrative and engineering costs were $200. Maintenance: Project was operated and maintained, and inspections and evaluations performed at a cost of $434,440. Bank protection and recreation maintenance contracts cost $411,497. Contract for cultural resource investigation cost $505. Contract for law enforcement cost $15,170. Administrative and other miscellaneous costs were $147,197. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project completed in March 1956 except construction of recreational facilities which is being accomplished intermittently. United States owns 7,816.5 acres of land in fee and easements on 666.2 acres. Construction initiated in July 1947 and major features completed in November 1950. Dam was placed in permanent operation in spring of 1951. Structures are in good condition. 19. LAKE TRAVERSE AND BOIS DE SIOUX RIVER, S. DAK., AND MINN. Location. Works covered by this project lie along Lake Traverse and Bois de Sioux River between upper end of Lake Traverse at Browns Valley, Minn., and the mouth of Bois de Sioux River at Breckenridge, Minn. Lake drains through river to Red River of the North, and the two waters form a portion of boundary between State of Minnesota and States of North and South Dakota. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. See page 1289 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project was authorized by Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Project and related facilities were operated and maintained, and inspections and evaluations performed at a cost of $196,171. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was completed in June 1948, except for minor recreation facilities. Fee title to 1,144.13 acres and easements on 6,172.25 acres of land have been acquired. White Rock Dam and Reservation control structures are in operation, and structures and appurtenances are in good condition. Remedial work for repair of apron at White Rock Dam was completed in November 1968. Roadways across structures are open to public travel. 20. MANKATO AND NORTH MANKATO, MINN. Location. Along Minnesota River between miles 103.5 and 109.5 near Mankato, North Mankato, and Le Hillier, in 27-6 ST. PAUL, MINN., DISTRICT south-central Minnesota. (For general location see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. As modified as a result of severe 1965 flood, provides for protection of communities of Mankato, North Mankato, and Le Hillier by means of levees and floodwalls with pumping plants and interior drainage facilities. See page 1090 of Annual Report for 1967 for further details. Additional channel improvement, levees, pumping, and interior drainage features have been included in the Mankato unit of the project for protection from the high flows of Indian Creek. Expansion of Indian Creek improvements were made during detailed studies as a result of updated hydrologic data. Highway bridge relocations made necessary by the project have been authorized at Federal expense. Estimated Federal cost (1981) for new work is $88,600,000. Project was authorized by 1958 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 437, 84th Cong., 2d sess., contains latest published map.) Project was modified by 1965 Flood Control Act, and by the Water Resources Development Acts of 1974 and 1976. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for work under contract. See Annual Report for 1973 for requirements. Resolutions agreeing to provide formal assurances of local cooperation, when requested, were passed by the city council of North Mankato, Mankato, and South Bend Township (Le Hillier), respectively, on November 12, 1968. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Construction of stage 3B-2A (Mankato) and Stage 4B (North Mankato) was completed. Construction of Stage 3B- 1 and Stage 3B-2B (Mankato) was initiated. Construction costs for improvements at Mankato were $3,078,941, at North Mankato were $33,688 and at Le Hillier were $2,729. Engineering and design by contract cost $316,776 and by hired labor cost $565,955. Supervision and administration cost $295,829. Condition at end of fiscal year. Contract work for construction of stage 1A, S1-H.P., 4A and 4B (North Mankato), stage 2A (Mankato along the Blue Earth River), stage 2B (Le Hillier), stage 3A-1 and 3A-2, 3B-2A (Mankato) is complete. Construction of stage 3B-1 and 3B-2B (Mankato) is underway. Detailed planning for remaining features to standard project flood design is in progress. 21. MINOT, N. DAK. Location. In Ward County in northwestern North Dakota on the Souris River, extending from Burlington through Minot to the village of Logan. The river meanders through Minot, flowing generally from west to east and divides the community into two parts. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of North Dakota.) Existing project. Project provides for channel improvement within a 37.0-mile reach of the Souris River extending from Burlington to Logan. For details see Annual Report for 1973. Project was authorized in 1970 under section 201 of the Flood Control Act of 1965. (H. Doc. 321, 91st Cong., 1st sess., contains latest published map). Resolutions were adopted by the Public Works Committees of the Senate on June 25, 1970 and the House on July 14, 1970. Project has been modified by the Water Resource Development Act of 1974 and 1976. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for work under contract. See Annual Report for 1971 for requirements. On May 26, 1971 the Ward County Water Management Board approved the motion to provide assurances of local cooperation. The resolution was furnished by letter dated June 16, 1971 and accepted by the District Engineer on August 9, 1971. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Construction costs by contract for the year amounted to $265,746. Engineering and design cost $11,800. Supervision and administration costs were $8,264. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of Roosevelt Park improvements, snagging and clearing Reach A-1 downstream of Minot, and channel improvements for reaches A-2, A-3, B-1, B-1A, B-1B, B-2, C, C-1, D, D-1, D-A, E, E-l, F and three pumping stations have been completed. A contract for channel repair and landscaping has been completed. 22. PEMBINA RIVER, N. DAK. Location. Near the Pembina-Cavalier County line in northeastern North Dakota on the Pembina River, two miles southwest of Walhalla, North Dakota. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of North Dakota.) Existing project. Plan of improvement proposed in the 1976 feasibility report provides for a multiple-purpose impoundment for flood control, water supply and recreation. The earth-filled dam will be about 1,960 feet long, and 150 feet high with a fixed crest concrete spillway and outlet channel. The impoundment will have a storage capacity of 147,000 acre-feet at design flood pool elevation. The conservation pool would have a surface area of 800 acres with public use facilities adjoining the pool for recreation and wildlife management. Lands for wildlife habitat mitigation are included in the project. Estimated Federal cost (1981) for new work exclusive of Phase I costs is $40,500,000. Project was authorized by the 1976 Water Resources Development Act. (H. Doc. 116, 96th Congress, 1st sess., contains latest published map.) Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1977 for requirements. A local assurance agreement will be required prior to the initiation of construction. A September 1975 resolution of intent to assume the allocated non-Federal water supply costs has been received from the North Dakota State Water Commission. The North Dakota State Park Service has agreed by letter dated 13 August 1976 to work closely with local recreation entities to develop arrangements to provide the local cooperation for recreation. Further support of the project by the State of North Dakota was provided in letters dated 17 August 1976, 11 April 1977, and 11 July 1977, and by the North Dakota State Legislature in a resolution signed by the Governor on 17 March 1981. Operations and results during fiscal year. Phase I design memorandum stage of advance engineering and design was continued under the General Investigations program. Condition at end of fiscal year. Phase I design memorandum stage of advance engineering and design is in progress under the General Investigations program. 23. PRAIRIE DU CHIEN, WIS. Location. In Crawford County in southwestern Wisconsin on the left bank of the Mississippi River. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Wisconsin.) Existing project. Combines total evacuation with flood proofing and land use control measures to provide the desired reduction of potential flood damages within design limits. Evacuation would be accomplished by purchase and relocation of structures in the lowest portions of the flood- 27-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 plain. Estimated cost (1981) to the United States for new work is $4,020,000. Project was authorized by Water Resources Development Act of 1974. Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1974 for requirements. A local assurance agreement in accordance with Section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 was entered into with the city of Prairie du Chien on May 2, 1978 and signed by the Chief of Engineers on September 11, 1978. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Costs for property acquisition and relocation activities were $1,079,149. Contracts for floodproofing and site restoration cost $18,867 and $46,086, respectively. Engineering and design cost $30,003 and supervision and administration cost $15,658. Contributions in lieu of cash were $-196,952. Condition at end of fiscal year. Property acquisitions and relocations are in progress. 24. RED LAKE RIVER, MINN., INCLUDING CLEARWATER RIVER, MINN. Location. Works covered by this project lie along upper reach of Red Lake River and also along Clearwater River, a tributary of Red Lake River, between a point near Plummer, Minn., and a point just above the mouth of Ruffy Brook. Red Lake River, principal tributary of Red River of the North, has its source at the outlet of Lower Red Lake in northwestern portion of Minnesota and flows westerly about 196 miles to its junction with Red River of the North at East Grand Forks, Minn. Clearwater River has a general westerly course from its source near Ebro, Minn., about 205 miles to its junction with Red Lake River at Red Lake Falls, Minn. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. See page 1281 of Annual Report for 1962. Project was authorized by 1944 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 345, 78th Cong., 1st sess., contains latest published map.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Structures were operated and maintained and inspections and evaluations performed at a cost of $48,100. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of major improvements on Red Lake River initiated in February and the Clearwater River initiated in October 1948 were completed in June 1956. Replacement of a rock and brush dam on Red Lake River at Indian boundary with a concrete structure and appurtenant work was completed in June 1959 to restore marshes in the area to better wildlife conditions. Construction of a bridge on Clearwater Road was completed by the Indian Service in July 1965. A contract for improvements on Red Lake River was completed in November 1966, and a contract for restoration of water levels in Red Lake River marshes was completed in July 1967. Increased slope protection downstream of the control structure was completed in November 1968. Operation of Red Lake Dam was assumed by the Corps on April 1, 1951. Channels are in good condition and indicate effectiveness of project as a flood control measure. 25. RED RIVER OF THE NORTH DRAINAGE BASIN, MINN., S. DAK. & N. DAK. Location. Red River of the North basin, within the United States, includes northeastern corner of South Dakota and much of eastern North Dakota and northwestern Minnesota. Red River of the North, formed by confluence of Otter Tail and Bois de Sioux Rivers, flows northward through this region, forming boundary between North Dakota and Minnesota. (For general location of basin, see Geological Survey maps of Minnesota and South Dakota.) Previous project. See page 1278 of Annual Report for 1962 for navigation and flood control projects in the basin, not part of this project. Existing project. Project includes improvements for local protection in interests of flood control and major drainage accomplished by channel improvement, levees, etc., in addition to construction of a multiple purpose reservoir on Otter Tail River to control floods and, in conjunction with previously authorized Federal reservoir project at Baldhill site of Sheyenne River and at Red Lake, to increase low flows for water supply and pollution abatement. (See table 27-F for active units in comprehensive basin plan.) Project was authorized by Flood Control Acts of 1948 and 1950. Public Works Authorization Act, 1957, authorized Chief of Engineers to acquire such lands as were beyond legal authority of city of Grand Forks to acquire. Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 provided for extension of the expiration date for the East Grand Forks project. Authorization of the Sheyenne River (Kindred Lake) project by the 1970 Flood Control Act provided for the deletion of channel improvement on the lower 48.8 miles of the Sheyenne River authorized under the Flood Control Acts of 1948 and 1950. Latest published map is in House Document 185, 81st Congress, 1st session. Local cooperation. See page 1039 of Annual Report for 1965. Following the flood of 1965, the city of East Grand Forks requested reactivation of the project and furnished a resolution adopted May 11, 1965, indicating its willingness to meet the requirements of local cooperation. Expiration date for the East Grand Forks project was extended to April 17, 1975 permitting local interests additional time to furnish assurances of local cooperation. A local assurance agreement was passed by the city on March 27, 1975 and accepted by the acting Director of Real Estate, OCE for the Secretary of the Army on April 9, 1975. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Preconstruction planning was continued for the East Grand Forks project at a cost of $196,973. Maintenance: Orwell Lake and Dam were operated as required and miscellaneous inspections, reports, and repairs were made at a cost of $118,284. Dam operations and maintenance contracts cost $300. Cultural resource investigation contract and a hydrology contract cost $15,500 and $14,580 respectively. Supervision and administration and other miscellaneous costs were $16,166. Condition at end of fiscal year. Major construction for all active units except for East Grand Forks, Minn., is complete. Preconstruction planning is underway at East Grand Forks. A total of 1,985 acres of land for Orwell Lake and Dam is owned in fee by the United States. See page 1281 of Annual Report for 1962 for periods of completion at active units of project other than Fargo. Work at Fargo, N. Dak., started in May 1959, was completed in July 1963. (See table 27-F at end of chapter for total costs of new work to date.) Costs to date for operation and maintenance of Orwell Lake and Dam are $1,998,885. Total costs for active portion of project are $8,720,080. In addition, $350,034 was expended from contributed funds for work done for local interests. 27-8 ST. PAUL, MINN., DISTRICT 26. RED RIVER OF THE NORTH AT OSLO, MINN. Location. In Marshall County in northwestern Minnesota on the Red River of the North about 20 miles north of Grand Forks, North Dakota. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. Provides for a levee encircling the village of Oslo and an agricultural tract north of the village. Wherever possible, the levee has been constructed contiguously with an existing emergency levee, and is about 10 feet high and 3.2 miles long with a top width of from 10 to 12 feet. The project also provides interior drainage facilities, including a pumping station, two ponding areas, interceptor and outfall sewers, and drainage ditches; highway and street ramps; temporary sandbag closures; and landscape measures. Total Federal costs (1979) for new work are estimated at $1,993,200. Project was approved by the Chief of Engineers for construction on August 2, 1972 under the authority contained in section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1973 for requirements. A local assurance agreement required by Public Law 91-611 was adopted by the village of Oslo on October 15, 1972. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $17,517. Condition at end of fiscal year. A construction contract was awarded in June 1974. Project is complete except for construction of bank stabilization measures. 27. ROCHESTER, MINN. Location. In Olmstead County in southeastern Minnesota on the South Fork of the Zumbro River. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. Provides for channel modifications supplemented by levees at and in the vicinity of Rochester, together with appropriate flood warning and floodplain regulation measures. Principal project features include approximately 0.9 miles of concrete-lined channel, 7.3 miles of riprap or gabion lined channel, 1.1 miles of grass-sloped channels, 2.6 miles of levees, drop structures, bridge modifications, and interceptor sewers and ditches for interior drainage. A river corridor hiking and biking trail system, four new parks, and other environmental treatment measures are also included in the proposed plan. Estimated cost (1981) to the United States for new work is $59,600,000. Project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1974 (H. Doc. 156, 93rd Cong., 1st sess., contains latest published map.) Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1974 for requirements. By resolution approved on September 29, 1981 the city of Rochester, the local sponsor, indicated its willingness and intention to meet the requirements of local cooperation for flood control and recreation. Formal assurances will be requested after completion of the Phase II Design Memorandum. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Preconstruction planning was continued at a cost of $487,806. Condition at end of fiscal year. Phase I design memorandum stage of preconstruction planning was completed and forwarded to Congress on 27 April 1979 which was the basis for authority to proceed with the Phase II design memorandum stage of advance engineering and design. Phase II studies are in progress. 28. ROSEAU RIVER, MINN. Location. In Roseau County and northeastern Kittson County, in northwestern Minnesota, and in south-central Manitoba, Canada. (For general location of the works in United States see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. Provides for improvement of Roseau River for flood control consisting of 44.4 miles of channel improvement, two sections of earth levees with lengths of 1.9 and 5.9 miles, respectively, 76 side ditch inlet transitions; remedial works along 16.6 miles of channel in Canada or an acceptable alternative therefor; one new bridge; and alteration of the existing dam in Roseau Village. Remedial works will be constructed in Canada at the expense of the United States. Estimated cost (1981) to the United States for new work is $25,000,000, including $5,513,000 for cost of work in Canada to be accomplished with United States funds. Project was authorized by Flood Control Act of 1965 (H. Doc. 282, 89th Cong., 1st sess., contains latest published map.) Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1968 for requirements. Local interests have formed a Roseau River Watershed District and have started proceedings to acquire rights-of-way. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Planning activities were continued relative to coordination of the project plan with Canadian interests. Engineering and design and supervision and administration cost $82,644. Condition at end of fiscal year. Planning is in progress and coordination with Canadian interests is underway. The general design memorandum was submitted in October 1971 and approved in March 1972. Design memorandum supplements which contain dimensions of environmental features added to the project were submitted in October 1975 and June 1980 and approved in November 1975 and July 1980, respectively. An EIS supplement was completed for filing with EPA. The local sponsor is in the process of acquiring the rights-of-way. 29. SHEYENNE RIVER FLOOD CONTROL, N. DAK. (Formerly Kindred Lake) Location. The Sheyenne River basin is included in 16 counties in the southeastern portion of North Dakota and drains an area of 7,140 square miles into the Red River of the North near Fargo, North Dakota. The principal area of flood damages in the basin is located at the lower end within Cass County and the city of West Fargo. The authorized project is in Richland County, N. Dak., on the Sheyenne River, about 70 miles above its mouth and 5 miles above Kindred, N. Dak. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of North Dakota.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a multiple-purpose impoundment for flood control, water quality control, recreation, and fish and wildlife purposes to control the runoff from 3,014 square miles. The improvements would be coupled with a revised operating plan for the existing Baldhill Dam and with appropriate flood plain management measures at communities along the river. See Annual Report for 1973 for details. Estimated Federal cost (1981) for Phase I General Design Memorandum is $2,300,000. Project was authorized by 1970 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 330, 91st Cong., 2d sess., contains latest published map.) Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1971 for 27-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 requirements of the project as authorized. On January 23, 1976, the North Dakota State Water Commission passed a resolution expressing continued interest and support in evaluating flood control alternatives on the lower Sheyenne River basin. On August 12, 1981, the North Dakota State Water Commission passed a resolution supporting a new flood damage reduction plan for the basin. Formal assurances of local cooperation will be requested after completion of the Phase II, General Design Memorandum. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Preconstruction planning was continued at a cost of $271,488. Condition at end of fiscal year. Preconstruction planning is in progress. Due to local concerns, a changed set of planning criteria, and potential changed conditions, a comolete reformulation and reevaluation of alternatives is being undertaken during preconstruction planning. The reevaluation studies are showing that another alternative plan is more favorable than the authorized project. This alternative plan consists of a raise of Baldhill Dam, levees and a flood diversion channel at West Fargo. Other actions are also identified that could be taken by non-Federal interests to enhance the degree of flood damage reduction provided by the overall plan. This new plan represents a significant change from the authorized project and should be ready for recommendation to Congress for authorization in FY 1982. 30. STATE ROAD AND EBNER COULEES, WIS. Location. In La Crosse County in west-central Wisconsin, on the east side of the city of La Crosse. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Wisconsin.) Existing project. The plan of improvement for State Road Coulee provides for channel deepening and enlarging downstream from Hagen Bridge to the mouth, and includes an 11,600-foot section of concrete-lined, trapezoidal-shaped channel, a 600-foot-long concrete flume, a drop structure, a stilling basin, three new street bridges, and a new railroad bridge. The city recently replaced a fourth bridge, previously included in the authorized plan. The plan of improvement for Ebner Coulee provides for diversion works about 8,600 feet long, controlling flood flows through a concrete flume, and twin precast-concrete conduits into an enlarged Miller Coulee channel and thence into a marshy area in the La Crosse River floodplain. Estimated cost (1981) to the United States for new work is $31,300,000. Project was authorized by 1968 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 360, 90th Cong., 2d sess., contains published map.) Local cooperation. See page 826 of Annual Report for 1969. The local sponsor withdrew support for the project in 1976 citing increased non-Federal costs and lack of agreement on local cost sharing between three local units of government located within the project area. The project was reclassified as inactive on 7 April 1977 but was reactivated on 8 November 1978 after the La Crosse County Board of Supervisors, the La Crosse City Council, and the Town of Shelby passed separate resolutions on 17 September 1978, 13 July 1978, and 10 July 1978, respectively, which requested continuance of the project. All three groups reaffirmed their support by letter in July 1981. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Preconstruction planning was continued at a cost of $220,423. Condition at end of fiscal year. Preconstruction planning is in progress. 31. TWIN VALLEY LAKE, WILD RICE RIVER, MINN. Location. In Norman County in west-central Minnesota, northeast of the city of Moorhead, on the Wild Rice River about 2 miles east of Twin Valley, Minn. The Wild Rice River is a tributary of the Red River of the North. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. The project authorization provides for reservoir development on the Wild Rice River near Twin Valley, Minnesota, for flood damage reduction, recreation, and fish and wildlife enhancement. The principal features include an 84 foot high, 7,700 foot long, earthen dam, a gated concrete spillway with concrete chute and stilling basin, a 10 foot diameter gated circular conduit for low flow outlet works, and recreation development on the created 540 acre reservoir. Storage capacity would provide 7,500 acre-feet for recreation and sedimentation and 44,700 acrefeet for flood control. The proposed works include development of three recreation areas along the margin of the lake for public use. The Federal Government would acquire about 3,500 acres of land necessary for carrying out the purposes of the project. Approximately 2,200 additional acres will be acquired to offset fish and wildlife habitat losses associated with project construction. Estimated Federal cost (1981) for new work is $31,000,000. Project was authorized by 1970 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 366, 90th Congress, 2d sess., contains latest published map.) Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1971 for requirements. Local interests have not been requested to furnish assurances. The Norman County Board of Commissioners, by resolutions dated November 7, 1974, September 19, 1978, and August 26, 1981, has declared its intention to provide local cooperation for recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement. Both the Norman County Board of Commissioners and the Wild Rice River Watershed District have indicated the capability to provide assurances of local cooperation relating to flood control improvements. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Preconstruction planning was continued at a cost of $8,720. Condition at end of fiscal year. Preconstruction planning is in progress. Project requires further authorization for mitigation lands. 32. WILD RICE RIVER-SOUTH BRANCH AND FELTON DITCH, MINN. Location. In Clay and Norman Counties in west-central Minnesota northeast of the city of Moorhead, Minn. The South Branch of the Wild Rice River and Felton Ditch drain areas of 253 and 122 square miles and enter the Wild Rice River at points 29.5 and 20.5 miles, respectively, above its confluence with the Red River of the North. (For general locations, see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. Provides for increasing the capacities of the South Branch and Felton Ditch channels by widening the existing channels through the floodplain. Debris removal would be accomplished in the lower reaches of both streams. In addition, short reaches of low dikes would be constructed on both banks of Felton Ditch near the upper limit of improvement. The plan also includes bridge and culvert structure alterations, new bridges, multiplate pipe arches, side ditch inlet and lateral ditch entry modifi- 27-10 ST. PAUL, MINN., DISTRICT cations, and a drop inlet structure. The project would provide flood protection in both watersheds for a 6-percent chance flood and outlets necessary for removal of cropdamaging surface waters from lateral and on-farm drainage systems. Estimated Federal cost (1981) for new work is $4,210,000. Project was authorized by 1968 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 98, 90th Cong., 1st sess., contains latest published map.) Local cooperation. See page 826 of Annual Report for 1969 for requirements. A local assurance agreement in accordance with Section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 'was executed by the Wild Rice Watershed District on 18 October 1978. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Contract for channel modification cost $1,130,612. Engineering and design and supervision and administration cost $201,181. Condition at end of fiscal year. Approximately $2,000,000 worth of construction remains to be completed. 33. WINONA, MINN. Location. At Winona County in southeastern Minnesota on the right bank of the Mississippi River about 725 miles above mouth of Ohio River. (For general location see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. See page 833 of Annual Report for 1968 for completed upstream improvements authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1958 providing for a continuous flood barrier about 6.1 miles long with related pumping and interior drainage facilities. Federal costs amounted to $2,147,131 of which $111,500 was expended for the portion then deferred for restudy and $17,316 was contributed by local interests. Improvement authorized in 1971 under Section 201 of the Flood Control Act of 1965 (H. Doc. 152, 92d Cong., 1st sess., contains latest published map) provides for levee and floodwall protection with necessary interior drainage works for the riverfront and the Lake Winona closure reaches, as well as a sound floodplain management program to prevent unwise development of the area bordered by U.S. Highway 61 and Burns Valley and Pleasant Valley Creeks. The plan would also provide the downstream flood barrier needed to prevent Mississippi River backup flows from entering Lake Winona and inundating the area now only partially protected by the completed segment of the project authorized by the 1958 Flood Control Act. The selected plan would also provide control of Burns Valley Creek by means of channel improvement, raising and extending the existing levee system, a drop structure, an erosion control structure, alteration of two highway bridges, and a sewer line modification. Earth levees averaging 10 feet in height total approximately 3.1 miles in length. Concrete floodwalls, also averaging about 10 feet in height, total about 2,025 feet in length. Estimated Federal cost (1981) for new work is $30,000,000 and $570,000 is to be contributed by local interests. Resolutions authorizing the project were adopted by the Public Works Committees of the House on July 29, 1971, and the Senate on November 18, 1971. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. See page 833 of Annual Report for 1968 for requirements. For improvements authorized in 1971 see Annual Report for 1972 for requirements. A local cooperation agreement required under Section 221 of the 1970 Flood Control Act was executed by the city of Winona on 6 October 1978. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Construction contracts for Reaches A, C and E cost $645,901, $1,056,588, and $1,056,999, respectively. Pumping station contracts cost $405,163. Engineering and design cost $495,124 by contract and $526,763 by hired labor. Supervision and administration cost $181,515. Condition at end of fiscal year. The upstream improvement except for a portion of the project raising and extending the existing levee downstream from the Lake Winona outlet was completed in August 1967. At the request of local interests, the uncompleted portion of the project authorized in 1958 was not constructed in order that the scope of the project could be reconsidered to allow for the protection of additional lands needed by the city for industrial expansion. This work was deferred for restudy and now has been deauthorized by approval and authorization in 1971 of additional protection for Winona. Preconstruction planning for the improvement authorized in 1971 is complete. Construction on Reach A is completed. Construction on Reaches C and E-1 is in progress. 34. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Flood control projects turned over to local interests were inspected to determine that project channels are kept clean and unobstructed, dikes and revetments are in good condition, and structures are in good repair and operable. Deficiencies, if any, were minor unless noted. (See table 27- G on inspection of completed flood control projects.) Cost for the period was $48,371. Total cost to September 30, 1981 was $499,095. 35. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See table 27-H. 36. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization). See table 27-I. Emergency bank protection (Section 14 of 1946 Flood Control Act. Public Law 526, 79th Congress). See table 27-I. Emergency flood control activities - repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation.) See table 27-I. General Investigations 37. SURVEYS Navigation studies continued at a cost of $69,595. Flood control studies continued at a cost of $956,086. Special studies on the Upper Mississippi River (GREAT I), coordination studies with other agencies, review of the completed projects at Redwood River at Marshall, Minn. and at St. Paul, Minn. and Phase I preauthorization studies at Pembina River, N. Dak. and Grafton, N. Dak. were conducted at a cost of $1,311,099. Total cost of surveys for the period was $2,336,780. 27-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 38. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA $367,359 for inspection and inventory of dams in conjunction with the national program of inspection of non- Costs during the period were $28,195 for International Federal dams. Total cost for Collection and Study of Basic Water Studies and $217,915 for Flood Plain Management Data was $672,042. ,,...,.,. r.., , ..... . Q r.,.A AA.M l,. ,,a fA A1. A1 A services. Cos8ts were $o,573 for stream nlow Uata oUataneu by Corps gaging beyond cooperative stream-gaging program, and for hydraulic laboratory work in measurement and analysis of sediment load in streams. Costs were 39. OTHER WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORITY See table 27-J. 27-12 ST. PAUL, MINN., DISTRICT TABLE 27-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost to Section September 30 In Text Project Funding FY78 FY79 FY80 FY81 1981 1. Minnesota River, Minn. 3. Reservoirs at Headwaters of Mississippi River, Minn. 4. St. Croix River Minn. and Wis. 5. Warroad Harbor and River, Minn. 8. Bassett Creek, Minn. 9. Big Stone Lake and Whetstone River, Minn. and S. Dak. 10. Burlington Dam Souris River, N. Dak. 11. Chaska, Minn. 12. Eau Galle River, Wis. 14. Homme Lake and Dam, N. Dak. New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maj. Rehab: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost 21,400 21,400 344,000 55,000 101,795 183,442 1,258,000 1,447,300 1,435,688 1,302,119 106,600 106,599 11,310 11,310 - - - $2,057,7221 - - - 2,057,7221 20,000 22,000 143,000 1,369,186 20,000 21,944 142,178 1,368,308 30,000 122,195 1,095,000 1,197,737 23,400 178,000 23,391 171,072 -14,200 7,649 1,146,000 1,134,443 1,000 7,938 6,482 31,0004 15,000 6,482 27,8454 17,249 - 178,000 387,000 250,000 - 125,680 382,567 300,621 388,000 -1,600,000 109,000 75,614 121,902 115,313 84,000 88,000 102,000 83,163 87,768 102,569 1,083,000 800,000 1,161,538 692,184 149,568 125,000 108,599 100,500 97,295 25,000 53,971 - 200,000 244,000 240,000 - 172,052 261,605 248,430 4,394,6282 4,394,4092 15,353,8583 15,285,7713 425,000 425,000 150,410 150,410 938,255 938,255 86,105 86,105 780,280 779,374 815,000 808,868 9,325,000 9,305,364 563,200 559,494 5,568,500 5,549,453 684,000 682,087 - 9,039,250 - 9,039,250 406,000 438,500 610,550 336,503 252,000 84,400 240,350 99,576 398,000 773,800 2,967,105 456,089 545,148 2,692,777 - - 1,396,0975 - - 1,396,0975 97,000 268,000 1,740,421 77,467 267,360 1,718,481 27-13 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 27-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost to Section September 30 In Text Project Funding FY78 FY79 FY80 FY81 1981 15. Lac qui Parle Lakes, Minn. 17. La Farge Lake and Channel Imp., Wis. 18. Lake Ashtabula and Baldhill Dam, Sheyenne River, N. Dak. 19. Lake Traverse and Bois de Sioux River, S. Dak. and Minn. 20. Mankato and North Mankato, Minn. 21. Minot, N. Dak. 23. Prairie du Chien, Wis. 24. Red Lake River, Minn., including Clearwater River, Minn. 25. Red River of the North Drainage Basin, Minn., S Dak. and N. Dak. 26. Red River ofthe North at Oslo, Minn. 27. Rochester,Minn. 28. Roseau River, Minn. 29. Sheyenne River, N. Dak. (formerly Kindred Lake) New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost - $964,873 - 964,873 136,600 169,000 320,000 203,000 137,892 169,754 318,827 187,895 - - - 120,000 115,438 45,876 5,792 339,802 109,700 55,000 - 200 18,352 145,604 744 200 2,110,000 740,200 1,685,000 366,000 864,196 1,403,430 1;141,031 1,008,809 138,000 164,000 180,000 174,000 138,529 164,888 154,650 196,171 3,603,000 3,890,000 5,000,000 4,150,000 4,769,654 4,288,223 5,043,149 4,293,918 1,684,000 350,000 - 160,000 1,568,538 318,620 111,989 285,810 106,000 575,000 875,000 1,000,000 109,043 588,621 859,040 992,811 - 3,120,0797 - 3,120,0797 49,000 48,400 34,000 32,000 48,100 34,600 32,000 48,100 - 141,000 161,000 - 104,374 196,973 173,000 348,800 153,000 172,000 172,493 260,164 222,273 164,830 - 60,000 - - 11,332 29,248 17,205 17,517 36,000 204,000 550,000 330,000 38,932 109,998 486,812 487,806 -2,195,000 189,000 145,000 100,000 215,054 200,443 145,482 82,644 377,000 638,000 387,000 250,000 384,115 '23,552 394,317 271,488 27-14 2,821,163 2,803,658 18,092,000 18,078,355 3,307,6386 3,307,6386 8,481,112 7,983,794 1,339,727 1,339,727 2,095,619 2,090,503 37,183,500 36,716,327 21,479,500 21,440,462 2,809,000 2,781,223 587,802 587,802 6,799,9848 6,799,3318 2,027,534 1,998,885 1,535,200 1,534,360 1,529,000 1,526,252 1,378,000 1,358,425 2,097,000 2,096,540 ST. PAUL, MINN., DISTRICT TABLE 27-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost to Section September 30 In Text Project Funding FY78 FY79 FY80 FY81 1981 30. State Road & New Work: Ebner Coulees, Approp. - 25,000 150,000 254,000 710,000 Wis. Cost - 24,929 139,641 220,423 665,993 31. Twin Valley Lake, New Work: Wild Rice River, Approp. 557,000 232,000 - - 1,911,700 Minn. Cost 723,368 360,857 9,046 8,721 1,910,813 32. Wild Rice River, New Work: South Branch Approp. - 85,000 150,000 1,815,000 2,450,700 and Felton Cost 5,486 84,844 149,510 1,331,793 1,965,846 Ditch, Minn. 33. Winona, Minn. New Work: Approp. 25,000 1,700,000 3,600,000 4,345,000 12,900,1319 Cost 39,914 838,617 4,405,217 4,368,053 12,856,8029 1. Includes $117,542 for new work for previous project. Excludes $359,202 contributed funds. 2. Includes $681,805 for new work for previous projects. 3. Includes $100,857 for maintenance for previous projects. 4. Excludes $100 for condition surveys. 5. Excludes $56,220 contributed funds. 6. Excludes $208,000 contributed funds. 7. Excludes $30,020 contributed funds. 8. Includes cost of the Wahpeton-Breckenridge unit, $11,239, which is classed as "inactive" and the units on which authorization has expired: Maple River, $1,241; Moorhead, $27,700; Sheyenne, $37,956. In addition, $203,874 special deposit funds and $146,160 in other contributed funds have been expended for work under Government contract paid for by local interests. 9. Excludes $227,849 contributed funds. 27-15 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 27-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents July 13, 1892 July 3, 1958 Mar. 3, 1899 Mar. 2, 1907 June 25, 1910 July 27, 1916 June 26, 19342 June 18, 1878 June 3, 1896 Jan. 21, 1927 Aug. 30, 1935 May 17, 1950 Mar. 3, 1899 June 6, 1900 June 13, 19023 Mar. 3, 1905 June 25, 1910 July 25, 1912 MINNESOTA RIVER, MINN. (See Section I of Text) Open-channel improvement from mouth to Shakopee to obtain a channel of 4-foot depth to accommodate vessels with 3-foot draft. Dredging to provide channel of 9-foot depth from mouth to mile 14.7 RESERVOIRS AT HEADWATERS OF MISSISSIPPI RIVER, MINN. (See Section 3 of Text) Reconstruct 4 of the 5 original dams and surveys to determine extent of lands overflowed by reservoirs. Reconstruct Sandy Lake Dam and construct Gull Lake Reservoir. Construct an equalizing canal between Winnibigoshish and Leech Lake Reservoirs (no work was done and this part of the project abandoned in Act of Mar. 4, 1915.) Abandonment of ditches connecting Long Lake, Round Lake, and Gull Lake. Operation and maintenance provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors. Annual Report 1891. p. 2209 S. Doc. 144. 84th Cong., 2d sess.' H. Doc. 363, 61st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 413, 64th Cong., 1st sess.' ST. CROIX RIVER, MINN. AND WIS. (See Section 4 of Text) Dredging, etc., for a 3-foot channel between mouth and Taylors H. Ex. Doc. 75, pt. 6, 43rd Falls. Cong., 2d Sess;4 Annual Report 1875, p. 372. Harbor and waterfront at Stillwater. A 6-foot channel to Stillwater. H. Doc. 378, 69th Cong., 1st sess. 4 The 9-foot channel from mouth to Stillwater. H. Doc. 184, 72nd Cong., 1st sess. 4 Small-boat harbor at Hudson. H. Doc. 184, 81st Cong., 1st sess.4 WARROAD HARBOR AND RIVER, MINN. (See Section 5 of Text) Dredging bar at mouth of Warroad River. Specified in Act. Entrance channel 300 feet wide and 7 feet deep. H. Doc. 92, 56th Cong., 2d sess.5 Enlarging turning basin H. Doc. 703, 61st Cong., 2d sess. 5 Deepening to 8 feet. 1. Contains latest published map. 2. Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. 3. Appropriation. 4. See H. Doc. 462, 71st Congress, 2d sess., for latest published map. 5. Latest published map is opposite p. 1984 in Annual Report for 1911. 27-16 TABLE 27-C RESERVOIRS AT HEADWATERS OF MISSISSIPPI RIVER (See Section 3 of Text) Outlet Watershed Area (square miles) Capacity Outlet at Previous Projects Existing Projects Minimum Above Watershed Maximum Stages St. Paul (square Original Stage Com- Com- Total Reservoir (feet)1 River (miles) miles) Lake Reservoir (acre-feet) pleted Cost pleted Cost Cost Winnibigoshish 6 Mississippi 408 1,442 117 179.4 967,930 1884 $214,000 1900 $173,470 $387,470 Leech Lake 0 Leech 410 1,163 173 250.9 743,320 1884 171,805 1902 84,380 256,185 Pokegama 6 Mississippi 344 6602 24 35.0 120,750 1884 85,000 1904 126,030 211,030 Sandy Lake 7 Sandy 267 421 8 16.6 72,500 1895 114,000 1909 117,020 231,020 Pine River 9 Pine 199 562 18 23.7 177,520 1886 97,000 1907 133,320 230,320 Gull Lake 5 Gull 168 287 20 20.5 70,820 - - 1913 86,826 86,826 Surveys and flowage rights - - - - 160,939 160,939 Recreational facilities - - - - 2,830,620 2,830,620 Total new work - - 681,805 - 3,712,605 4,394,410 Total operating and care - - 100,857 - 14,217,717 14,318,574 Permanent indefinite appropriation for operating and care, Feb. 1, 1895. to end of fiscal year 1936 - - - - 967,197 967,197 Rehabilitation - - - - 425,000 425,000 Total 2,152,840 - $782,662 - $19,322,519 $20,105,181 1. Lower operating limits by regulations approved February 4, 1936, as modified December 29, 1944. 2. Exclusive of area controlled by Winnibigoshish and Leech Lake Dams. d r] z zl d6 yr 1|.. ' REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 27-D OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost To September 30,1981 Full Report See Annual Operation And Project Report For Construction Maintenance Baudette Harbor, Minn.' 1961 $36,415 $46,4889 Black River, Wis.3 1950 67,585 - Lake Traverse, Minn. and S. Dak. 5'6 1921 92 - Mississippi and Leech Rivers, Minn.' 5 1929 277,615 40,251 Mississippi River between Brainerd and Grand Rapids, Minn.7 1925 47,794 3,891 Pine Creek, Angle Inlet, Minn. 1978 38,700 102,196 Red Lake and Red Lake River, Minn. 15 1923 9,070 - Red River of the North, Minn. and N. Dak. 5'8 1921 293,344 76,209 Wisconsin River, Wis. 46, 1888 - - Zippel Bay Harbor, Minn. 2,7 1928 27,941 11,139 1. Completed. included under 'Fox and Wisconsin Rivers, Wis.'. No break- 2. Inactive. down available. 3. Existing channel adequate for commerce. Portion of 5. No commerce reported. project for removal of obstructions at various points outside 6. Abandonment recommended in 1915 (H. Doc. 439, the dredged area to clear channel to full project width con- 64th Cong., 1st sess.) and June 24, 1926 (H. Doc. 467, 69th sidered unnecessary to meet present navigation require- Cong., 1st sess.). ments, and classified inactive was deauthorized on 7. Abandonment recommended June 24, 1926 (H. Doc. August 5, 1977 under Section 12 of Public Law 93-251. 467, 69th Cong., 1st sess.). 4. Originally included in project 'Fox and Wisconsin 8. Abandonment recommended in 1915 (H. Doc. 1666, Rivers, Wis.'. Abandonment of improvement of Wisconsin 63d Cong., 3d sess.). River by channel contraction works recommended in 1886 9. Excludes $300 for project condition surveys. and 1887 (H. Ex. Doc. 65, 49th Cong., 2d sess.). Expenditures TABLE 27-E NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation Activities Pursuant to Section 107 Public Law 86-645 (preauthorization) (See Section 7 of Text) Study identification Fiscal Year Costs Lake City Harbor, Minn. $32,552 Pike Island, Minn. 50,461 Trempealeau, Wis. 75,968 Warroad Harbor, Minn. 14,559 Zippel Bay, Lake of the Woods Co., Minn. 40,554 27-18 ST. PAUL, MINN., DISTRICT TABLE 27-F RED RIVER OF THE NORTH DRAINAGE BASIN: ACTIVE UNITS IN COMPREHENSIVE BASIN PLAN (See Section 25 of Text) Total Cost to Estimated Name of Unit September 30, 1981 Federal Cost Orwell Reservoir (Otter Tail River) Minnesota Reservoir $1,916,753 $1,916,7001 Wild Rice and Marsh Rivers Minnesota Channel improvement 405,056 405,100 Rush River North Dakota Channel improvement 287,686 287,000 Sand Hill River Minnesota Channel improvement 548,778 548,800 Mustinka River Minnesota Channel improvement 440,788 440,800 Otter Tail River Minnesota Channel improvement 174,768 174,800 Red River at Grand Forks North Dakota Levees and floodwall 948,895 948,900 Red River at East Grand Forks Minnesota Levees, floodwall, pumping plants 358,547 11,200,000 Red River at Fargo North Dakota Channel improvement, levees 1,639,924 1,639,9002 Total cost to date 6,721,1953 Total estimated cost 17,562,0004 'Includes $178,000 for lands and $25,000 for recreation facilities. 2Includes $67,900 for lands. 3Costs of $11,239 for the Wahpeton-Breckenridge inactive unit not included. Authorization of the Sheyenne River, Moorhead, and Maple River units has expired. Cost of these units also not included total $66,897. 4The Wahpeton-Breckenridge unit of the project is classed as 'inactive' and is excluded from the estimate. The cost of this unit, last revised in 1955, was estimated to be $996,000. The Flood Control Act approved December 31, 1970 (H. Doc. 330-01-2) provided for deletion of the Sheyenne River unit, and Authorization of the Maple River and Moorhead units expired at the end of the 5-year period within which local interests were required to furnish assurances of local cooperation. Authorization of these units, not included, expired on the dates indicated. Unit Sheyenne River, N. Dak. Maple River, N. Dak. Moorhead, Minn. Date Authorizaton expired December 31, 1970 October 26, 1961 October 30, 1961 27-19 Cost to date $37,956 1,241 .27,700 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 27-G INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 34 of Text) Project Date Inspected Arcadia, Wis. ..................................................... September 1981 Black River (North Bend), Wis ................ ....................... September 1981 Bois de Sioux River, Minn., N. Dak., & S. Dak ............................. November 1980 Clearwater River, Minn........................ .............. November 1980 Cochrane, Wis .................................................... September 1981 Decorah, Iowa ......................... ............................ September 1981 Elk River, Minn .................................................. August 1981 Enderlin, N. Dak. ... ...................................................... August 1981 Fargo, N. Dak ...................................................... August 1981 Forest River, N. Dak. ............................................ November 1980 Grand Forks, N. Dak.................................................... August 1981 Guttenberg, Iowa .............................................. September 1981 Hastings, Minn.................................... ................. July 1981 Lost River, Minn. ................................................ November 1980 Marshall, Minn................................... ............. August 1981 Marsh River, Minn. ......................... ................... November 1980 Mines Creek, Wis.............................................. ............. October 1980 Minneota, Minn. .................................................... August 1981 Mustinka River, Minn ........ ................ .................. November 1980 New Albin, Iowa ................................................... August 1981 North Mankato, Minn ...... ........................................... July 1981 Ottertail River, Minn ....... ...................................... November 1980 Park River, N. Dak .................................................. November 1980 Pembina, N. Dak .................................................................. August 1981 Red Lake River, Minn............. ................... .............. November 1980 Redwood River, Minn..................................................... November 1980 Rushford, Minn....................................................... September 1981 Rush River, N. Dak. ............................................... November 1980 Sand Hill River, Minn..................................... November 1980 Sheyenne River, N. Dak.............. ............................... November 1980 Velva, N. Dak ......................................... .............. June 1981 Wild Rice River, Minn......................................... November 1980 Winona, Minn .................................................... September 1981 Zumbro River, Minn....................................... ..................... July 1981 27-20 ST. PAUL, MINN., DISTRICT TABLE 27-H OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost To September 30,1981 Full Report See Annual Operation And Project Report For Construction Maintenance Dry Run, Iowa' 1966 $1,790,759 - Elk River, Minn. " ,2 1970 259,7003 Guttenberg, Iowa' 1974 2,361,915 - Lost River, Minn.' 1967 563,5531 Lower Branch Rush River, N. Dak. 1,2 1974 1,000,0005 - Marshall, Minn. 1964 1,802,866 - Minneota, Minn. 1 2 1963 161,545 - Mississippi River near Aitkin, Minn.1 1957 1,675,835 - Pembina River Lake, N. Dak.7 1950 50,000 - Red River of the North at Pembina, N. Dak. 1,2 1979 2,000,000 Redwood River below Marshall, Minn. 1,2 1960 202,400 - Rushford, Minn.' 1980 3,192,333 - St. Paul and South St. Paul, Minn.' 1974 8,476,0128 - Tongue River Lake, N. Dak.7 1950 23,695 - Upper Iowa River, Iowa 1964 888,445 - Upper Mississippi River Basin (St. Paul Dist.) Black River Lake, Wis.9 1950 - - Velva, N. Dak. 1,2 1970 334,628 - Vermillion River, Hastings, Minn.'1,2 1980 999,900 - Warroad River and Bull Dog Creek, Minn. 6 1974 182,000 - Zumbro River, Minn.' 1975 1,284,100 - 1. Completed. limitation of their funding capability. The project was clas- 2. Project authorized by Chief of Engineers under sified inactive on April 5, 1974. small project authority, section 205, 1948 Flood Control 7. Further work deferred pending review of project Act, as amended. document (inactive). 3. In addition $87,878 was expended from Public Law 8. Excludes $545,637 contributed funds for new work 99 funds in the spring of 1969 for emergency protection and and $38,000 expended by South St. Paul for work in lieu of incorporation into the permanent project. required cash contribution. Excludes an additional 4. Includes $46,034 for the Ruffy Brook unit for which $206,629 expended for work done at request of local authorization expired in April 1966. Excludes $246,911 con- interests. tributed funds. 9. Project never selected for construction and classified 5. Excludes $35,000 contributed funds. inactive was deauthorized on August 5, 1977 under Section 6. Preconstruction planning suspended. Local inter- 12 of Public 93-251. ests requested the project be reclassified to inactive due to a 27-21 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 27-I FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Section 36 of Text) Flood control activities pursuant to section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization) Study Identification Fiscal Year Costs Argyle, Minn. Middle River $22,661 Cook, Minn. Little Fork River 37,698 Devils Lake, N. Dak. 102,911 Enderlin, N. Dak., Maple River 68,804 English Coulee, Grand Forks, N. Dak. 29,623 McGregor, Iowa 50,034 Red River of the North, Argusville, N. Dak. 42,695 Red River of the North, Halstad, Minn. 109,998 Sauk Rapids, Minn., Benton County Ditch No. 3 42,795 Snake River, below Warren, Minn. 5,178 Souris River, Velva, N. Dak. 47,293 Emergency Bank Protection (Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Congress). Project and Location Fiscal Year Costs Irving Township, Jackson Co., Wis. $8,993 Mahnomen, Minn., Wild Rice River 7,375 Red River of the North, Breckenridge, Minn. 27,500 Emergency flood control activities - repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation). Project Fiscal Year Costs Disaster preparedness $125,861 TABLE 27-J OTHER WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORITY Project Fiscal Year Costs Aquatic Plant Control (Section 302, Public Law 89-298) $10,029 Streambank Erosion Control Evaluation and Demonstration Program (SSeecctitoionn 1352 aPnudb li1c6 1L, aPwu b9l3ic-2 5L1a, wa s9 4a-m58e7n)d ed by 347,871 27-22 ROCK ISLAND, ILL., DISTRICT* This district comprises most of the northern half of Illinois, portions of southwestern Wisconsin, southern and southwestern Minnesota, eastern and central Iowa, and northeastern Missouri, embraced in drainage basin of Mississippi River and its eastern and western tributaries between mile 300 (above mouth of Ohio River) and 614, and of its eastern tributaries only, between Hamburg Bay, at mile 261 and 300. This district also includes the Illinois Waterway above mile 80 with its tributaries and drainage basins, the Illinois and Mississippi Canal and drainage basin of Bureau Creek. The section of the Mississippi River between river miles 300 and 614 is included in the report on Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, Minn. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Illinois Waterway, Ill. and Ind....................28-2 2. Illinois and Mississippi Canal, Ill.................28-3 3. Mill Creek and South Slough at Milan, Ill.........28-4 4. Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, Minn......................... 28-4 5. Other Authorized Navigation Projects ............ 28-4 6. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ... 28-4 Flood Control 7. Bettendorf, Iowa ................ ............. 28-4 8. Burlington, Iowa ................ ............. 28-5 9. Clinton, Iowa ................................. 28-5 10. Coralville Lake, Iowa ................... ....... 28-5 11. Davenport, Iowa............................... .. 28-5 12. East Moline, Ill. ................................ 28-5 13. Evansdale, Iowa ........................ .. 28-5 14. Farm Creek, Ill ............................. ....28-6 15. Fulton, Ill..................... ............... 28-6 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. Flood Control (Con't.) Page Marengo, Iowa .................................. 28-6 Milan, Ill. ............. ........ ........... 28-6 M oline, Ill. ................... ................. 28-6 Muscatine, Mad Creek, Iowa ..................... 28-7 Red Rock Dam and Lake Red Rock, Iowa ......... 28-7 Rockford, Ill. .................................... 28-8 Rock River Agricultural Levees, Ill................ 28-8 Saylorville Lake, Iowa ............................ 28-8 Waterloo, Iowa .................................. 28-8 Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ... 28-9 Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ......... 28-9 Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization. 28-9 General Investigations Surveys ......................................... 28-9 Collection and Study of Basic Data .............. 28-9 Research and Development ...................... 28-9 *All cost and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 28-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 Navigation 1. ILLINOIS WATERWAY, ILL. AND IND. Location. Illinois River (entirely within State of Illinois), formed by confluence of Kankakee and Des Plaines River, flows southwesterly and enters Mississippi at Grafton, Ill., about 38 miles above St. Louis. Illinois Waterway comprises Illinois River from its mouth to confluence of Kankakee and Des Plaines Rivers (273 miles); Des Plaines River to Lockport (18.1 miles) and Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal and South Branch of Chicago River to Lake Street, Chicago (34.5 miles). Also from a point 12.4 miles above Lockport, Ill., waterway comprises Calumet-Sag Channel and Little Calumet and Calumet Rivers to turning basin 5, near entrance to Lake Calumet (23.8 miles); and Grand Calumet River from junction to 141st Street, deep (lake) draft navigation (9 miles) and to Clark Street, Gary, Ind. (4.2 miles). Previous Projects. For details, see page 1945 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1172 of Annual Report for 1932. Existing project. See table 28-K and page 1255 of Annual Report for 1963. Estimated cost of new work 1978 is $1,065,080,208 and includes $445,000 for Recreation Facilities under Code 711. Calumet-Sag Modification, Part II, placed in the inactive category in June 1973, cost of $132,000,000 (July 1972) Federal and $16,300,000 (July 1972) non-Federal; Calumet-Sag Modification, Part III, placed in the deferred-for-restudy category in March 1972, cost of $33,000,000 (July 1971) Federal and $20,700,000 (July 1971) non-Federal; widen Pekin Bend, a portion of work authorized by River and Harbor Act of 1935, placed in the inactive category, cost of $1,360,700 (July 1972) Federal; and, widen Marseilles Canal to 300 feet, a portion of work authorized by River and Harbor Act of 1935, placed in the deferred category, cost of $1,859,300 (July 1972) Federal, are all excluded from present cost estimate. (See also tables 28-C, 28-H, 28-I, 28-J on authorizing legislation; existing and proposed locks and dams; lock and dam construction, foundations, cost and additional features entering into cost of project.) Local cooperation. Complied with for completed modifications and Part I of Calumet-Sag Modification. Required cooperation under October 23, 1962 Act (Duplicate Locks) is that prior to construction local interests agree to assume title to and maintain and operate new bridge across lower approach to Brandon Road lock when bridge is placed in service. Initial assurances for the October 23, 1962 Act were received from the State of Illinois 19 December 1969. Formal assurances based on the project as reformulated in the GDM - Phase I studies were requested from the State of Illinois 7 March 1975. Reaffirmation of assurances have not been received from the State. For details see Pages 1412 to 1414, Annual Report of 1962. All pools above Alton Pool: Maintenance: Strike removal was accomplished at a cost of $208,200; dredging and snagging at a cost of $27,000. Study by Argonne National Laboratory covering potential use of abandoned strip mines for dredged material and for sediment analysis in connection with dredge disposal was provided at a cost of $136,000. Contract and S & I expenditures at the Lucas-Berg Disposal Area, a containment area for contaminated dredge spoil from the Calumet-Sag channel, were $1,201,000. This contract was awarded by and is being administered by Chicago District, but funded by Rock Island District. Structural repairs to the dams, including rehabilitation of the wicket dams at Peoria and LaGrange, was performed at a cost of $480,100. Overhaul of lock gates at two locks (Peoria and LaGrange) cost $397,600, and other lock structural maintenance and repairs cost $780,000. Contract costs for repair of the lower guidewall at Marseilles Lock and Dam cost $128,200. Levee repairs were performed at a cost of $12,900. Repairs and replacement of permanent operating equipment cost $212,100. Building maintenance and other maintenance work at various sites was performed at a cost of $58,000. Contractor earned $23,400 for installation of an air conditioning system at the Starved Rock Visitor Center; contractor earned $70,300 for erection of a new maintenance and shop building at O'Brien Lock and Dam. Engineering and design work totaled $323,700. Supervision and administration and district overhead for the maintenance features totaled $376,500. Net credits to the project were $15,600. Operation and care of locks and dams. Operation of the locks and dams and routine maintenance and minor repairs thereto were made at a cost of $3,591,100, and service facilities at Joliet and Peoria project offices were operated at a cost of $751,500. Real estate management services were provided at a cost of $73,400; visitors' center at Starved Rock Lock and Dam was operated at a cost of $66,800; surveys, studies, and structural inspections were performed at a cost of $291,800; and hydrographic channel surveys were performed at a cost of $122,500. Navigation Information Bulletins cost $27,700. The OMNI Computer System, which is used primarily for the Performance Monitoring System of monitoring lockage data and movement of vessels data through the locks, was operated at a cost of $93,000. Water control management costs were $542,400. Supervision and administration and district overhead for operations features totaled $888,000. Total operation and maintenance costs were $10,867,600 for all pools above Alton Pool. Rehabilitation: Rehabilitation work at Dresden Island and Starved Rock Locks and Dams was in progress. Costs at Dresden Island Lock and Dam were $3,740,306 and at Starved Rock Lock and Dam were $616,449, a total of $4,356,755. Operations and results duringperiod. New work: Calumet- Sag Modification, Part I - Final cost allocation changes for close-out of bridge rebuilding efforts were $23,626. Alton Pool Operation: Costs by hired labor for condition and operation studies were $120,500; water control management $46,600; and supervision and administration, $8,700. Alton Pool Maintenance: Costs for the year were $1,088,900 for dredging; and $10,600 for supervision and administration. Total cost for work in Alton Pool $1,275,300. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project, exclusive of the deferred and inactive portion and the Calumet-Sag and Duplicate Locks modifications, is complete. The Calumet-Sag Modification, Part I, construction is 100% complete, except for final closing of costs with Cook County on 127th Street and Ridgeland Avenue Bridges, and with the City of Chicago on Indiana Avenue Highway Bridge and 130th Street Bridge, and the design contract for seven highwvay bridges. Final closing of costs for two railroad contracts (Conrail and Illinois Central Gulf Railroad) are still pending. Preconstruction planning on the Duplicate Locks has been suspended due to lack of local cooperation. 28-2 ROCK ISLAND, ILL., DISTRICT Eight locks and six dams were complete and there is a channel 300 feet wide and 9 feet deep between Grafton and Lockport, Ill., with exception of Marseilles Canal which is 200 feet wide. Limiting horizontal clearance is as follows: 118 feet at a bridge in the reach from Grafton to Utica, Ill.; 110 feet at bridges between Utica and Lockport, Ill.; 80 feet at the emergency (Butterfly) dam, mile 293, between Lockport and Sag Junction; 80 feet at a bridge between the Sag Junction and Lake Michigan via Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal and Chicago River and 188.5 feet at a bridge between the Sag Junction and turning basin 5 in Calumet River, via the Calumet-Sag Channel. Work remaining on 1935 modification consisting of widening of Pekin Bend and widening Marseilles Canal has been reclassified to inactive and deferred. Calumet-Sag Modification, Part II, has been reclassified to inactive. Calumet-Sag Modification, Part III, has been deferred-for-restudy. (See table 28-L for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1981). 2. ILLINOIS AND MISSISSIPPI CANAL, ILL. Location. Extends for 75 miles from Illinois River near LaSalle to Mississippi River at Rock Island. Existing project. See pages 1306-1308 of Annual Report for 1962 for details regarding project. This obsolete canal has been repaired and modified as a condition for its transfer to the State of Illinois as part of the State park system. Operations and results during period. None. Condition as of Sept. 30. Existing project completed in 1918. Canal has not been operated for navigation since June 1951. Repair and modification program to be accomplished prior to disposal of canal initiated in fiscal year 1961, and a number of canal features have been repaired or modified. In connection with the repair and modification program, fee title to 1,062 acres and recreational flowage easements over 309 acres of land in Rock River near Rock Falls, formerly under navigational flowage easement, have been acquired. The State of Illinois accepted title to the canal as of August 1, 1970. The River and Harbor Act of 1970 authorized the appropriation of $6,528,000 for further repair and modification. 3. MILL CREEK AND SOUTH SLOUGH AT MILAN, ILL. Location. Mill Creek and South Slough at Milan, Rock Island County, Ill. Previous project. See page 1132, Annual Report for 1932, and page 1081, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Provided for diversion of Mill Creek into South Slough, flood gates in walls of Illinois and Mississippi Canal to carry Mill Creek flood waters across canal right-ofway into Rock River, levees, and other works for flood protection at Milan. Project was modified to restore original Mill Creek outlet into Rock River. See Table 28-C for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during period. Minor channel maintenance was performed at a cost of $9,101. Condition as of Sept. 30. Existing project was completed in 1932. In 1962-63 $73,366 was expended from Illinois and Mississippi maintenance funds for restoration of Mill Creek outlet into Rock River. 4. MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS, MINN. For report on this improvement see chapter on Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, Minn. 5. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS See Table 28-B. 6. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Sec. 107, Public Law 86-645, as amended (preauthorization). Preauthorization study cost for fiscal year was $83,772 for small-boat harbor in Muscooten Bay, Illinois River, near Beardstown, Ill. Flood Control 7. BETTENDORF, IOWA Location. On right bank of Mississippi River, 485.7 miles above mouth of Ohio River, in Scott County, Iowa. Existing project. Local protection from Mississippi River floods to be provided by construction of 3 miles of earth levee, railroad raises, closure structures, and street raises and ramps. Estimated project cost is $9,430,000, including $1,540,000 non-Federal cost for land and relocations. See Table 28-C for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Preconstruction planning was continued at a cost of $267,248. Condition as of Sept. 30. No construction performed. Preconstruction planning in progress. 8. BURLINGTON, IOWA Location. Industrial area of Burlington, Des Moines County, Iowa, on Mississippi River at approximate river mile 405 above the mouth of the Ohio River. Existing project. Local protection from floods on the Mississippi River and Flint Creek by construction of earth levee, floodwall, interior drainage, and two railroad closure structures. Total estimated cost is $2,687,000, including $477,000 non-Federal cost. See Table 28-C for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during period. New work: Preconstruction planning continued at a cost of $18,592. Condition as of Sept. 30. Construction not yet initiated. 9. CLINTON, IOWA Location. On right bank of Mississippi River, 518.2 miles above mouth of Ohio River, in Clinton County, Iowa. Existing project. Local protection from Mississippi River floods provided by construction of 8.1 miles of earth levee, 3,080 feet of I-type concrete floodwall, 1,250 feet of precast panel freeboard wall, interceptor sewer, closure structures, ramps, 6 pumping stations, ponding areas, and gate wells. In cooperation with the city of Clinton, a number of innovative features were incorporated in the project, such as a scenic drive atop the levee, a showboat-museum on the riverfront, and memorials, terraces, and walkways. See Table 28-C for authorizing legislation. 28-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during period. New work: Construction completed. Project dedication ceremony was held on June 6, 1981. Costs were $1,143,109. Condition as of Sept. 30. Construction was initiated in August 1974 and completed in June 1981. 10. CORALVILLE LAKE, IOWA Location. On Iowa River, several miles upstream from Iowa City, in Johnson County, Iowa, about 83 miles above mouth of Iowa River. Existing project. An earthfill dam rising about 100 feet above streambed, a 500-foot uncontrolled spillway, outlet works to control flow of river to bankfull stage below dam, and a reservoir providing flood control pool of 475,000 acrefeet. In addition, a conservation pool is provided which varies from 17,000 acre-feet from February through June to 53,750 acre-feet from July to February of each year. Coralville Lake is used to store Iowa River flows temporarily during flood periods. Project minimizes flood damages on Iowa River from dam to mouth of Cedar River, and provides a high degree of protection to lands along Iowa River below mouth of Cedar River. Project also effects significant reduction of Mississippi River flows at Keokuk, Iowa, and reduction of flows at Cairo, Ill. Benefits to conservation and recreation also accrue from project. Project modified to provide for highway bridge crossing the lake at the Mehaffey site. See Table 28-C for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. None required, except in connection with Mehaffey Bridge, which has been fully complied with. Operations and results during period. New work: Work in connection with expanded recreation facilities continued at a cost of $384,613. Additional land acquisition amounted to $787,644. Maintenance: Routine maintenance activities continued at a cost of $1,791,140. Expenditures from return of recreation use fees: $25,000. Condition as of Sept. 30. Construction began in July 1949 and project has been in operation since February 1958. About 24,112 acres of land were acquired in fee, and flowage easements obtained for 9,573 acres. Construction of Mehaffey Bridge began in June 1964 and completed in October 1966. The principal work items currently under way are construction of additional recreational facilities, acquisition of additional interest in flowage easement roads, and payments to Johnson County for damage to certain flowage easement roads. 11. DAVENPORT, IOWA Location. Right bank of Mississippi River, 482.4 miles above mouth of Ohio River, in Scott County, Iowa. Existing project. Local protection to the city from floods on Mississippi River to be provided by construction of levees and floodwall. Plan also includes interior drainage facilities and pump plants, closure structures, and recreational facilities. Estimated project cost is $41,410,000, including $5,410,000 non-Federal cost for land and relocations. See Table 28-C for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies. Local interests also to bear the cost of relocations, bear not less than one-half of the separable first cost for recreational development, obtain legal control to prevent encroachment on project features, and provide pressurized sewers at three locations. Local interests will be requested to. furnish assurances after a firm project plan is established. Operations and results during period. New work: Preconstruction planning continued at a cost of $126,707. Condition as of Sept. 30. No construction performed. Preconstruction planning in progress. 12. EAST MOLINE, ILL. Location. On left bank of Mississippi River, 489.3 miles above mouth of Ohio River, in Rock Island County, Illinois. Existing project. Local protection from Mississippi River and Rock River floods to be provided by construction of levees, railroad raises, street raises, a closure structure, gravity drainage outlets, open ditches, ponding areas, and pumping plants. Estimated project cost is $11,080,000, including $1,480,000 non-Federal cost for land and relocations. See Table 28-C for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during period. New work: Construction continued at a cost of $1,882,196. Condition as of Sept. 30. Construction initiated in July 1979 and is about 46 percent completed. 13. EVANSDALE, IOWA Location. The city of Evansdale is on the left bank of the Cedar River, in Black Hawk County, Iowa. Existing project. Local protection to the city to be provided by construction of levees, ponding areas, interior drainage facilities, and road ramps. About 1.1 miles of Highway I-380 through Evansdale will serve as part of the levee system. Estimated project cost is $5,140,000, including $1,070,000 non-Federal cost for lands and relocations. See table 28-C for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies. Local interests also to make all relocations and prevent encroachments on ponding areas. Assurances were approved June 23, 1980. Operations and results during period. New work: Construction initiated at a cost of $2,590,925. Condition as of Sept. 30. Construction was initiated in January 1981 and is about 72 percent completed. The Iowa Department of Transportation is concurrently engaged in construction of Highway I-380 through Evansdale, which will form part of the line of flood protection. 14. FARM CREEK, ILL. Location. Farm Creek watershed in Tazewell County, Ill. is 60 square miles in extent. Stream empties into Illinois Waterway at mile 162 above mouth. Existing project. Two compacted-earth flood-detention dams, Fondulac Dam on Fondulac Creek. Tazewell County, Ill., about 1.5 miles easterly of East Peoria, Ill., and Farmdale Dam on Farm Creek, Tazewell County, Ill., about 2.5 miles easterly of East Peoria, Ill., and improvements to Farm Creek, Cole Creek, and Kerfoot Creek Channels in East Peoria, Ill. Fondulac Dam has a maximum height of 67 feet above riverbed and a reservoir capacity of 3,780 acrefeet. Farmdale Dam has a maximum height of 80 feet above riverbed and a reservoir capacity of 15,500 acre-feet. Linear feet of channel improvements are: Farm Creek, 12,000 feet; Cole Creek, 1,875 feet; Kerfoot Creek, 900 feet. Project provides complete protection to residential, business, and highly developed industrial areas in East Peoria, Ill., 28-4 ROCK ISLAND, ILL., DISTRICT against design flows in Farm, Cole, Kerfoot, and Dempsey Creeks of expected frequency once in about 100 years. Existing project was authorized by 1944 Flood Control Act (See H.D. 802, 78th Cong., 2nd sess.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during period. Maintenance: Real estate acquisition for the Farmdale Dam and spillway discharge channel, including acquisition costs, relocation assistance payments, and removal of buildings and mobile homes from the acquired land, was performed at a cost of $81,991. Condition as of Sept. 30. Project is completed. Total costs of existing project to September 30, 1981 were $12,221,878 of which $10,020,833 was for new work ($9,859,020 regular funds and $161,813 contributed funds) and $2,201,045 regular funds for maintenance. 15. FULTON, ILL. Location. On left bank of Mississippi River, 520.1 miles above mouth of Ohio River, in Whiteside County, Ill. Existing project. Local protection from Mississippi River floods to be provided by construction of 12 miles of earth levee, railroad raises, road ramps, closure structures, gravity drainage outlets, ponding areas, storm sewer interceptors, and pumping plants. The improvements would also protect an adjacent rural area in the Cat Tail Drainage District, so as to provide access for the city to high ground. Estimated project cost is $19,540,000, including $2,140,000 non-Federal cost for land and relocations. See Table 28-C for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during period. New work: Construction continued at a cost of $3,091,254. Condition as of Sept. 30. Construction initiated in January 1978. Levee along Otter Creek at upstream end of project and new Burlington Northern Railroad bridge across Otter Creek have been completed. Work is continuing on the mainstem levees along the Mississippi River and on the pumping plant. The project is about 59 percent completed. 16. MARENGO, IOWA Location. The Iowa River and Bear Creek at Marengo in Iowa County, Iowa. Existing project. Local protection from floods on the Iowa River and Bear Creek by construction of new levee, improvement of existing levee, and interior drainage facilities. See Table 28-C for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during period. New work: Construction completed. Costs during the period were $215,331. Condition as of Sept. 30. Construction initiated in June 1978 and completed in February 1981. 17. MILAN, ILL. Location. On south bank of Rock River, several miles from the confluence of that stream with the Mississippi River at mile 479.1 above mouth of Ohio River, in Rock Island County, Ill. Existing project. Local protection against direct flooding from Rock River and Mill Creek and against backwater flooding from Mississippi River to be provided by construction of levees, flood walls, closure structure, bridges, pumping stations, drainage facilities, and street ramps. Estimated project cost is $16,035,000, including $3,235,000 non-Federal cost for land and relocations. See Table 28-C for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies. Local interests will also provide relocations and obtain legal control over pondage areas. Assurances were approved February 6, 1980. Operations and results during period. New work: Construction initiated. Costs during the period were $805',074. Condition as of Sept. 30. Construction was initiated in March 1981 and is about 13 percent completed. 18. MOLINE, ILL. Location. On left bank of Mississippi River, 485.7 miles above mouth of Ohio River, in Rock Island County, Illinois. Existing project. Local protection at Moline from Mississippi River floods to be provided by construction of 4 miles of earth levee and flood wall, closure structures, aesthetic and recreational development and interior drainage facilities consisting of gravity outlets, storm sewer interceptors, and pumping plants. Estimated project cost is $21,310,000, including $810,000 non-Federal cost for land and relocations. See Table 28-C for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies. Local interests will also provide relocations, bear not less than one-half of the separable first cost for recreational development, and prevent encroachment on ponding areas. Local interests will be requested to furnish assurances after a firm project plan is established. Operations and results during period. New work: Preconstruction planning continued at a cost of $34,181. Condition as of Sept. 30. No construction performed. Preconstruction planning in progress. 19. MUSCATINE, MAD CREEK, IOWA Location. On right bank of Mad Creek, a short distance upstream from the confluence of the creek with the Mississippi River at mile 455.8 above the mouth of the Ohio River, in Muscatine County, Iowa. Previous project. See page 1338, Annual Report 1962. Existing project. Local protection to a 75-acre industrial area at Muscatine from coincidental floods on Mad Creek and the Mississippi River. The site is upstream from the previous project, but some modification of that project is required. The work consists mainly of earth levees and concrete floodwalls. Estimated project cost is $1,146,600, including non-Federal cost of $50,000 for lands and damages. See table 28-C for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during period. New work: Preconstruction planning for Stage II of the project in progress. Costs during the period were $28,916. Condition as of Sept. 30. Stage I of the project, consisting of 1,010 feet of earth levee, 240 feet of concrete floodwall, a ponding area, a street closure, gatewells, a bridge raise, and railroad track modifications, was completed in February 1979. Construction of Stage II, which consists of raising 2,000 feet of existing railroad embankment, will be initiated early in Fiscal Year 1982. The entire project is 59 percent completed. 28-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 20. RED ROCK DAM AND LAKE RED ROCK, IOWA Location. On Des Moines River, Iowa, chiefly in Marion County, but extending into Jasper, Warren, and Polk Counties. Dam (Howell) site is 142.9 miles above mouth of Des Moines River, which empties into Mississippi River at mile 361.4 above mouth of Ohio River. City of Des Moines lies northwesterly from site, about 60 miles upstream. Existing project. Provides for a dam consisting of a rolled earth-fill embankment and gravity-type concrete spillway with crest gates, located near center of valley, each end of which is tied into embankment by a gravity-type nonoverflow concrete section. The dam, at crest elevation of 797 feet above mean sea level, is about 5,676 feet long and maximum height of 110 feet. Gated spillway is of concrete founded on bedrock with crest at elevation 736. Full flood control level (top of crest gates) is at elevation 780. Spillway crest gates are 45 feet high and 41 feet wide. Outlet works consisting of fourteen 5-by-9 foot gated conduits extend through spillway section and discharge into spillway stilling basin. Nonoverflow concrete sections of dam at each end of spillway are gravity-type, keyed into foundation rock. Drainage area above dam site is 12,323 square miles. With pool at full flood control elevation, lake area is about 65,000 acres; lake has a volume of 1,830,000 acre-feet of water at that height (1,740,000 for flood control and 90,000 for a permanent pool). Impoundment of floodwaters by lake results in materially reduced flood heights on Des Moines River below the dam, and also provides substantial supplementary benefits by reducing Mississippi River floods. See Table 28-C for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during period. New work: Construction of recreational facilities and incidental work continued at a cost of $761,068. Maintenance: Routine maintenance activities continued at a cost of $1,750,624. Expenditures from return of recreation use fees: $43,650. Condition as of Sept. 30. Construction began in May 1960. Dam was placed in beneficial use for storage of flood water in January 1969. Land acquired for project: 47,610 acres in fee and 28,214 acres in flowage easements. Construction of recreational facilities and improvement of access roads and parking areas are the principal current work items. 21. ROCKFORD, ILL. Location. Kent Creek, a right bank tributary of Rock River, Winnebago County, Ill. Existing project. Consists of rolled earth dam with outlet works and spillway on North Branch Kent Creek in Page Park; 12,000 feet of channel cleanout and straightening on North Branch Kent Creek; raise of Levings Lake Dam on South Branch Kent Creek and construction of spillway and diversion channel; 10,800 feet of channel cleanout and straightening on South Branch Kent Creek; and relocations. Estimated cost is $14,620,000, including $6,070,000 non-Federal cost for lands and relocations. See Table 28-C for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during period. New work: Construction continued at a cost of $202,576. Condition as of Sept. 30. Construction initiated in October 1978. The Page Park Dam has been completed, and channel cleanout and straightening is continuing. The project is about 56 percent completed. 22. ROCK RIVER AGRICULTURAL LEVEES, ILL. Location. Along both banks of the lower Rock River in Rock Island, Whiteside, and Henry Counties, Ill. Existing project. Provides for construction of levees and appurtenant works with incidental channel improvements for flood control in five areas, along the lower Rock River, mainly agricultural in character, as follows: Area 1, Carbon Cliff to Canoe Creek, right bank, 15.8 miles Area 2, Canoe Creek to Rock Creek, right bank, 16.2 miles Area 3, Rock Creek to Lyndon, right bank, 15 miles Area 4, near Spring Hill to Prophetstown, left bank, 10.2 miles Area 5, Penny Slough Levee and Drainage District, left bank, 9.1 miles Estimated project cost is $38,000,000, including $7,900,000 non-Federal cost. See Table 28-C for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies. Local interests would also bear the cost of relocations, except railroad bridges, and contribute in cash. No action toward fulfilling the requirements of local cooperation has been taken at this time. Operations and results during period. New work: A restudy of the project to determine its feasibility is in progress. Costs were $245,669. Condition as of Sept. 30. No construction performed. The project remained unfunded from time of authorization to 1979, when local interest revived. A project feasibility report is under preparation. 23. SAYLORVILLE LAKE, IOWA Location. Site is chiefly in Polk County, Iowa, but portions extend into Dallas and Boone Counties. Dam is about 213.7 miles above mouth of Des Moines River, and about 5 miles upstream from north limits of city of Des Moines. Existing project. Dam is an earth embankment 6,750 feet long at crest with a height of 120 feet. Outlet works are a single circular concrete conduit, 22 feet in diameter, located at toe of west bluff. Control structure is at upstream end of conduit and houses three gates. A stilling basin is provided to dissipate energy of discharge from outlet conduit. Spillway is in west bluff, weir 430 feet long. Water flowing over spillway weir will discharge into a paved chute and thence into an excavated earth channel to the Des Moines River. Top of spillway is about 31 feet below top of earth embankment section, and flow over weir will be uncontrolled when water in reservoir reaches its crest. Watershed area above damsite is 5,823 square miles. With pool at spillway crest elevation, lake area is 16,700 acres and contains about 676,000 acre-feet of water at that height (602,000 for flood control and 74,000 for a conservation pool to maintain minimum flows at downstream points). Lake supplements capacity of downstream Lake Red Rock at river mile 142.9. The two lakes provide a large degree of flood protection to lower Des Moines River Valley. Reaches along Mississippi River downstream from mouth of Des Moines River are also benefited. A project modification plan to minimize the adverse environmental effects at Ledges State Park, located upstream from the dam, was authorized in 1976. The project 28-6 ROCK ISLAND, ILL., DISTRICT modification includes relocation of affected park facilities, acquisition of additional park land, and the development of a floodway corridor, with recreational facilities, from the dam downstream to Sixth Avenue in Des Moines. Estimated project cost is $100,800,000, including $1,810,000 as a cash contribution from the State of Iowa toward recreational development. See Table 28-C for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during period. New work: Construction of recreational facilities, clearing in the upper reaches of the lake, and acquisition of land in the downstream floodway corridor was in progress at a cost of $3,250,480. Maintenance: Routine maintenance activities continued at a cost of $2,619,103. Expenditures from return of recreation use fees: $45,565. Conditions as of Sept. 30. Construction began in June 1965 and the project is 90 percent completed. The dam was placed in operation in April 1977. Remedial work in Big Creek Valley was completed in December 1974. Land acquisition is in progress, 25,852 acres acquired in fee, flowage easements obtained for 1,445 acres, and roadway easements obtained for 40 acres. The major work items remaining are recreational development and the project modification features authorized in 1976. 24. WATERLOO, IOWA Location. Both banks of Cedar River at Waterloo in Black Hawk County, Iowa. Existing project. Local protection from Cedar River and Black Hawk Creek floods to be provided by construction of levees, floodwalls, pumping plants, and closure structures on both sides of Cedar River and Black Hawk Creek. Estimated project cost is $55,852,000, including $10,450,000 non- Federal costs for rights-of-way and relocations. See Table 28-C for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during period. New work: Construction continued at a cost of $4,693,230. Condition as of Sept. 30. Construction was initiated in August 1972 and is continuing. A number of project features have been completed: levees and walls along both banks of Blackhawk Creek and at various reaches along both banks of the Cedar River, a dam on Virden Creek, relocation of the Waterloo Railroad Company bridge and removal of the old bridge, and a ring levee around the sewage treatment plant. Work is continuing on the remaining levees and the pump plant. The project is about 88 percent completed. 25. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Federal flood-control regulations (part 208 of title 33, Code of Federal Regulations) provide that the structures and facilities constructed by the United States for local flood protection shall be continuously maintained in such a manner and operated at such times and for such periods as may be necessary to obtain the maximum benefits. Costs during the period for inspections of projects turned over to local interests to ascertain compliance with Federal requirements were $121,412. (See Table 28-D for list of completed flood control projects inspected.) 26. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See Table 28-E. 27. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization). See Table 28-F. Emergency flood control activities - repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation). See Table 28-G. Snagging and clearing of navigable streams and tributaries in interest of flood control (Sec. 208 of 1954 Flood Control Act, Public Law 780, 83rd Cong.) See Table 28-F. Streambank Erosion Control Evaluation and Demonstration Act of 1974. A bank erosion problem on the Iowa River at Wapello, Iowa, was selected by the Chief of Engineers as a demonstration site under the above cited act. The project consists of a combination of permeable timber jetties, erosion control mat, and steel jacks. Construction was accomplished in 1978 and is to be monitored for five years to evaluate its success. Flowing ice damaged the project in the winter of 1978-1979 and repairs were made in 1979-1980. A project evaluation report is under preparation and plans are being made to turn the project over to the city of Wapello for operation and maintenance. Cost during the period was $26,536. Emergency bank protection (Section 14 of 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Congress). See Table 28-F. General Investigations 28. SURVEYS Navigation and flood control studies cost $968,406. Coordination studies with other agencies cost $115,153. Review of completed projects cost $640,649. Special studies cost $188,794. 29. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Costs for the period were $202,297 for flood plain management services, $86,231 for inspection of dams, and $13,546 for hydrologic studies, totaling $302,704. 30. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT Cost during the period was $5,594 for expanded flood plain information study on Crow Creek, Scott County, Iowa. 28-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 28-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 September 1981 1. Illinois Waterway, New Work: Ill. and Ind. Approp. - - - - 126,707,7511 2. Illinois and Mississippi Canal, Ill. 3. Mill Creek and South Slough at Milan, Ill. 7. Bettendorf, Iowa 8. Burlington, Iowa Con 9. Clinton, Iowa Con 10. Coralville Lake, Ia. 11. Davenport, Iowa 12. East Moline, Ill. Con 13. Evansdale, Iowa Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Rehab: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost ltributed Funds Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost itributed Funds Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost ltributed Funds Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 811,059 13,658,500 13,472,303 8,800,000 48 13,703,081 13,249,455 2,710,000 59 - 00 25,000 26,588 1,740,000 2,954,791 600,000 690,123 126,000 72,682 962,200 1,005,169 124,000 121,327 200,000 170,390 60,000 59,036 25,000 20,722 95,000 73,846 3,685,000 4,792,679 50,129 640,000 359,850 1,066,200 989,151 70,000 79,548 460,000 494,159 200,000 29,713 170,000 170,597 -1,332 14,766,600 12,056,579 745,000 990,201 15 14 46 11,210,500 12,142,900 5,490,000 4,356,755 -505 50,000 280,000 11,276 267,248 10,000 15,000 10,832 18,591 - 277,000 - 193,756 4,555,000 4,940,442 15,052 20,800 711,000 957,812 1,856,000 1,517,151 100,000 102,075 1,055,000 1,043,728 150,000 298,377 101,088 88,515 1,252,000 1,143,109 1,307,000 1,172,257 1,397,000 1,791,140 200,000 126,707 1,870,000 1,882,196 21,909 2,682,000 2,590,925 28-8 126,706,4131 166,840,8122 164,238,5812 18,159,625 16,913,051 7,605,1433 7,605,143 13,074,238 13,069,2084 63,719 63,719 706,980 681,226 259,500 258,928 277,000 193,756 26,010,480 25,851,482 761,056 761,056 20,292,788 19,113,410 12,198,005 12,143,9006 1,489,717 1,400,256 4,420,300 4,416,990 350,000 328,090 2,913,088 2,909,073 ROCK ISLAND, ILL., DISTRICT TABLE 28-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT I i 1 Total Cost to FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 September 1981 See Section in Text Project Funding 14. Farm Creek, Ill. New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost 15. Fulton, Ill. New Work: Approp. Cost 16. Marengo, Iowa New Work: Approp. Cost 17. Milan, Ill. New Work: Approp. Cost 18. Moline, Ill. New Work: Approp. Cost 19. Muscatine, Mad New Work: Creek, Iowa Approp. Cost 20. Red Rock Dam and New Work: Lake Red Rock Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost 21. Rockford, Ill. New Work: Approp. Cost 22. Rock River New Work: Agricultural Approp. Levees, Ill. Cost 23. Saylorville Lake, New Work: Iowa Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost 24. Waterloo, Iowa New Work: Approp. Cost Contributed Funds Approp. Cost 799,200 230,000 180,000 58,600 697,105 421,886 120,335 81,991 2,600,000 2,350,000 1,890,000 2,803,000 1,606,898 3,080,160 2,061,901 3,091,254 425,000 602,500 1,331,672 -50,000 373,840 288,065 1,428,943 215,331 25,000 135,000 270,000 935,000 25,412 119,861 241,435 805,074 157,000 200,000 237,000 - 180,127 207,714 203,299 34,180 200,000 15,000 19,000 25,000 399,352 39,443 24,112 28,916 1,249,000 1,000,000 700,000 843,000 1,010,658 652,715 942,713 761,068 1,878,900 1,522,700 1,480,000 2,145,400 1,619,083 1,774,056 1,435,729 1,750,624 1,000,000 1,200,000 1,750,000 246,000 192,831 2,018,083 1,738,763 202,876 - 60,000 150,000 245,000 - 59,879 147,852 245,669 7,300,000 2,825,000 1,490,000 2,896,000 6,632,743 3,768,856 1,415,079 3,250,480 1,188,000 1,155,600 1,454,000 2,547,000 1,087,130 1,259,863 1,362,790 2,619,103 3,000,000 5,670,000 4,035,000 4,930,000 4,321,058 6,538,275 4,016,039 4,693,230 83,300 - - - 1. Includes $2,569,102 for previous projects. 5. Includes $85 for previous project. 2. Includes $1,028,468 for previous projects. 6. Includes cost of Mehaffey Bridge, $1,365,074 (exclud- 3. Includes $25,000 Emergency Relief Funds. ing $100,000 contributed funds). 4. Includes $4,143,282 for Operating and Care under the 7. Excludes $161,813 contributed funds. "Permanent Indefinite Appropriation." 8. Excludes $950,000 non-Federal cost. 28-9 9,859,0207 9,859,0207 2,238,421 2,201,045 10,605,200 10,559,332 2,450,000 2,445,356 1,538,400 1,408,474 1,069,000 1,067,305 646,600 646,541 93,502,484 93,315,980 11,876,693 11,342,701 5,028,736 4,969,117 455,000 455,400 93,923,200 93,900,5218 7,733,700 7,650,982 40,287,100 39,883,305 83,300 83,300 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 28-B OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Section 5 of Text) For Last Cost To September 30, 1981 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Squaw Chute at Quincy, Ill.1 1967 70,9792 9,345 Quincy, Ill., Harbor Access Channel' 1970 35,4773 37,700 1. Completed. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under 2. Excludes $25,851 contributed funds. sec. 107, 1960 River and Harbor Act. 3. Excludes $35,350 contributed funds. TABLE 28-C AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Jan. 21, 1927 July 3, 1930 June 26, 19341 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 19353 June 14, 1937 June 20, 1938 Oct. 23, 1943 ILLINOIS WATERWAY, ILL. AND IND. (See Section 1 of Text) Channel 9 feet deep and 200 feet wide from mouth of Illinois River to Utica, 231 miles, modification of 2 U.S. locks and dams, removal of 2 State dams. (Act authorized appropriation of not to exceed $3,500,000 for carrying on work.) Channel 9 feet deep from Utica, Ill. to heads of present Federal' projects on Chicago and Calumet Rivers, 94.6 miles to Lake Street, and 96.3 miles to turning basin 5, respectively, to be secured by means of completed dams, locks, lateral canals, and dredging begun by State of Illinois in general accordance with present plans of state for that work. Act adopting project authorized appropriation of not to exceed $7,500,000 for carrying on work. Operation and care of locks and dams provided for with funds from War Department appropriation for rivers and harbors. Construct modern locks and dams at LaGrange and Peoria and a channel 9 feet deep and 300 feet wide below Lockport, exact location and details of design of all structures to be left to discretion of Chief of Engineers, and, for time being, that no change be made in water authorized for navigation of Illinois River by act of July 3, 1930. Also provides for 3 passing places along Sag Channel and authorized channel in Calumet-Sag route to turning basin 5, and dredging at entrance of Lake Calumet. Realign portion of Calumet River and abandonment of bypassed section of Calumet River. Modifies local cooperation requirements in 1935 act. Pay damages to levee and drainage districts due to seepage and other factors, not to exceed $503,500. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 69th Cong., 1st sess., and S. Doc. 130, 69th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 126, 71st Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 184, 73rd Cong., 2nd sess. 2 H. Doc. 180, 73rd Cong., 2nd sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 19, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 711, 77th Cong., 2nd sess. 28-10 ROCK ISLAND, ILL., DISTRICT TABLE 28-C (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 2 1945 July 24, 1946 H. Doc. 145, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 677, 79th Cong., 2nd sess. Enlarge Calumet-Sag Channel to 160 feet wide and a usable depth of 9 feet. Dredge a barge channel 160 feet wide with a usable depth of 9 feet in Grand Calumet and Little Calumet River Branch of Indiana Harbor Canal to deep (lake) draft through 141st St., East Chicago, Ind. Construct in Little Calumet River a lock of suitable dimensions for large navigation. Rebuild or otherwise alter at Federal expense all obstructive railroad bridges across Calumet-Sag Channel, Little Calumet River, Calumet River, Grand Calumet River, and Indiana Harbor Canal, so as to provide suitable clearance, except that no Federal funds shall be expended for removal or alteration of Illinois Central R.R. bridge at mile 11.20 of Little Calumet River. Substitute following work for that authorized by act of Mar. 2, 1945; replace emergency dam in Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal; enlargement of that canal thence to Sag Junction and of Calumet-Sag Channel to afford channels 225 feet wide and usable depth of 9 feet; construct along general route depth of 9 feet to 225 feet wide between Little Calumet River and junction with Indiana Harbor Canal and 160 feet wide thence to Clark St., Gary, Ind. with a turning basin at Clark St., enlarge Indiana Harbor Canal to 225 feet wide and usable depth of 9 feet between Grand Calumet River and vicinity of 141st St., inclusive; remove Blue Island lock and construct a lock and control works in Calumet River near its head, and similar structures in proposed Grand Calumet Channel west of Indiana Harbor Canal; alter or eliminate railroad bridges across three channels lakeward of Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal, or construct new railroad bridges to provide suitable clearance. A small-boat harbor in vicinity of Peoria, Ill., by construction of a basin 510 by 250 feet, dredged to 7 feet deep. $48,933 to reimburse Nutwood Drainage and Levee District for additional pumping operation; supplementing $58,750 authorized in Oct. 1943 act. Federal participation in alteration of highway bridges, Calumet-Sag Modification, Part I, which constitute unreasonable obstructions to navigation, in accordance with Public Law 647, 76th Cong., as amended. Construct auxiliary locks at Lockport, Brandon Road, Dresden Island, Marseilles, Starved Rock, Peoria, and LaGrange. Federal participation in alteration of highway bridges, Calumet-Sag Modification, Part II, which constitutes unreasonable obstructions to navigation, in accordance with Public Law 647, 76th Congress as amended. MILL CREEK AND SOUTH SLOUGH AT MILAN, ILL. (See Section 3 of Text) Channel diversion, flood gates, and other work for flood protection. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 19, 71st Cong., 2nd sess. 28-11 H. Doc. 698, 79th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 144, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 45, 85th Cong., 1st sess.4 H. Doc. 31, 86th Cong., 1st sess. Specified in Act. Also H. Doc. 45, 85th Cong., 1st sess. July 24, 1946 July 17, 1953 July 3, 1958 Oct. 23, 1962 Aug. 18, 1968 July 3, 1930 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 28-C (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents August 13, 1968 June 30, 1948 (Section 205) August 13, 1968 June 28, 1938 July 14, 1960 December 31, 1970 August 13, 1968 October 27, 1965 (Section 201) Approved by Committees on Public Works of House of Representatives and Senate, Sept. 23, 1976 and Oct. 1, 1976, respectively 1944 Flood Control Act August 13, 1968 June 30, 1948 (Section 205) August 13, 1968 October 27, 1965 (Section 201) Approved by Committees on Public Works of House of Representatives and Senate June 14, 1972, and June 21, 1972, respectively. BETTENDORF, IOWA (See Section 7 of Text) Levees, railroad raises, closure structures, and street raises and ramps for flood control. BURLINGTON, IOWA (See Section 8 of Text) Levee, floodwall, interior drainage, and railroad closures for flood control. CLINTON, IOWA (See Section 9 of Text) Levee, floodwall, railroad raises, street ramps, closure structures, pumping plants, and gravity drainage outlets for flood control. CORALVILLE LAKE, IOWA (See Section 10 of Text) Reservoir for flood control and recreation. Highway bridge across Coralville Lake at or near the Mehaffey site. DAVENPORT, IOWA (See Section 11 of Text) Levee, floodwall and pumping plants. EAST MOLINE, ILL. (See Section 12 of Text) Levee, railroad raises, street raises, closure structure, gravity drainage outlets, open ditches, ponding areas, and pumping plants for flood control. EVANSDALE, IOWA (See Section 13 of Text) Levees, ponding areas, interior drainage, and road ramps for flood control. FARM CREEK, ILL. (See Section 14 of Text) Two flood detention dams and channel improvements. FULTON, ILL. (See Section 15 of Text) Levee, railroad raises, road ramps, closure structures, gravity drainage outlets, ponding areas, storm sewer interceptors, and pumping plants for flood control. MARENGO, IOWA (See Section 16 of Text) Levees and interior drainage for flood control. MILAN, ILL. (See Section 17 of Text) Levee closure structures, gravity drainage outlets, ditches, ponding areas, and pumping plants for flood control. MOLINE, ILL. (See Section 18 of Text) Levee, closure structures, and interior drainage facilities for flood control, and aesthetic and recreational development. H. Doc. 348, 89th Cong., 2nd sess. None H. Doc. 348, 90th Cong., 2nd sess. Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. None H. Doc. 161, 92nd Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 348, 90th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 563, 94th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 802, 78th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 348, 90th Cong., 2nd sess. None H. Doc. 348, 90th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 161, 92nd Cong., 1st sess. 28-12 ROCK ISLAND, ILL., DISTRICT TABLE 28-C (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents MUSCATINE, MAD CREEK, IOWA (See Section 19 of Text) June 30, 1948 Levee, wall, interior drainage facilities, and closure None (Section 205) structures for streets and a railroad for flood control. RED ROCK DAM AND LAKE RED ROCK, IOWA (See Section 20 of Text) June 28, 1938 Reservoir for flood control and recreation. Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. ROCKFORD, ILL. (See Section 21 of Text) October 23, 1962 Channel enlargement and realignment, levees, and S. Doc. 142, 87th Cong., 2nd sess. appurtenant works for flood control. ROCK RIVER AGRICULTURAL LEVEES, ILL. (See Section 22 of Text) July 3, 1958 Levees and appurtenant works for flood control. H. Doc. 173, 85th Cong. SAYLORVILLE LAKE, IOWA (See Section 23 of Text) July 3, 1958 Reservoir for flood control and recreation. S. Doc. 9, 85th Cong., 1st sess. October 22, 1976 Modification to minimize adverse project impact on H. Doc. 487, 94th Cong., 2nd sess. Ledges State Park. WATERLOO, IOWA (See Section 24 of Text) October 27, 1965 Levees, floodwalls, pumping plants, and closure H. Doc. 166, 89th Cong., 1st sess. structures for flood control. 1. Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. Program Oct. 31, 2. Contains 1934, and Feb. 28, 1935. latest published map of Illinois and Des 4. Contains latest published maps of Calumet-Sag Plaines Rivers. portion. 3. Included, in part, in Public Works Administration TABLE 28-D INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 25 of Text) Date Project Inspected Alpine Dam, Rockford, Ill. October 1980 Banner Special Drainage and Levee District January 1981 Bear Creek, Hannibal, Mo. December 1980 Big Lake Drainage and Levee District, Ill. November 1980 Blackhawk Creek, Davenport, Iowa December 1980 Canton, Mo. December 1980 Clinton, Iowa October 1980 Coal Creek Drainage and Levee District, Ill. November 1980 Crane Creek Drainage and Levee District, Ill. November 1980 DeKalb, Ill. November 1980 Des Moines, Iowa November 1980 Des Moines and Mississippi Levee District No. 1, Mo. December 1980 Drury Drainage District, Ill. October 1980 Dubuque, Iowa October 1980 East Liverpool Drainage and Levee District, Ill. December 1980 East Peoria Drainage and Levee District, Ill. January 1981 East Peoria Sanitary District, Ill. January 1981 28-13 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 28-D INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (Continued) (See Section 25 of Text) Date Project Inspected Elkport, Iowa Fabius River Drainage District, Mo. Farmers Drainage and Levee District, Ill. Galena, Ill. Green Bay Levee and Drainage District No. 2, Iowa Gregory Drainage District, Mo. Henderson County Drainage District No. 1, Ill. Henderson County Drainage District No. 2, Ill. Henderson County Drainage District No. 3, Ill. Hennepin Drainage and Levee District Hergot Drainage and Levee District Hunt Drainage District & Lima Lake Drainage District, Ill. Indian Grave Drainage District, Ill. Iowa River-Flint Creek Levee District No. 16, Iowa Kerton Valley Drainage and Levee District, Ill. Lacey Drainage and Levee District, Ill. Langellier Drainage and Levee District, Ill. Liverpool Drainage and Levee District, Ill. Littleport, Iowa Lost Creek Drainage and Levee District, Ill. Mad Creek, Muscatine, Iowa Mason and Menard Drainage District, Ill. Marion County Drainage District, Mo. Marshalltown, Iowa Meredosia Levee and Drainage District, Ill. Muscatine Island L&DD, & Louisa DD No. 13, Iowa Oakford Special Drainage and Levee District, Ill. Pekin-LaMarsh Drainage and Levee District, Ill. Penny Slough Drainage and Levee District, Ill. Rock Island, Ill. Sabula, Iowa Sanitary District of Beardstown, Ill. Seahorn Drainage and Levee District, Ill. Sny Island Levee Drainage District, Ill. South Beardstown Drainage and Levee District, Ill. South Quincy Drainage and Levee District, Ill. South River Drainage District, Mo. Spring Lake Drainage and Levee District, Ill. Subdistrict No. 1 of Drainage Union No. 1, and Bay Island L&DD No. 1, Ill. The Sny Basin, Ill. Valley Drainage and Levee District, Ill. Van Meter, Iowa West Matanzas Drainage and Levee District, Ill. October 1980 December 1980 November 1980 October 1980 October 1980 December 1980 October 1980 October 1980 October 1980 January 1981 November 1980 December 1980 December 1980 October 1980 November 1980 November 1980 November 1980 December 1980 October 1980 November 1980 October 1980 November 1980 December 1980 November 1980 October 1980 November 1980 November 1980 January 1981 October 1980 October 1980 October 1980 November 1980 November 1980 December 1980 November 1980 December 1980 December 1980 January 1981 November 1980 December 1980 November 1980 November 1980 November 1980 28-14 ROCK ISLAND, ILL., DISTRICT TABLE 28-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 26 of Text) For Last Cost to September 30, 1980 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Ames Lake, Iowa 20 1974 1,790,3713 Banner Special Drainage and Levee Districts, Ill.' 1943 274,822 - Bear Creek Dam (City of Hannibal, Mo.)' 1962 1,679,056 - Big Lake Drainage and Levee District, Ill.' 1943 144,910 - Canton, Mo.' 1964 1,496,555 - Coal Creek Drainage and Levee District, Ill.' 1954 1,923,145 - Crane Creek Drainage and Levee District, Ill.' 1941 68,898 - Des Moines and Mississippi Levee District No. 1, Mo.' 1969 1,492,016 - Des Moines, Iowa' 1972 4,993,2247- Drury Drainage District, Ill.' 1964 1,144,875 - Dubuque, Iowa' 1974 10,861,1708 - East Liverpool Drainage and Levee District, Ill.' 1941 207,826 - East Peoria Drainage and Levee District, Ill.' 1946 279,963 - Elkport, Iowa' 1951 34,200 - Fabius River Drainage District, Mo.' 1941 60,500 - Fabius River Drainage District, Mo.' 1963 1,621,841 - Farmers Levee and Drainage District, Ill.' 1942 155,562 - Farmers Levee and Drainage District, Ill.16 - -- Freeport, Ill.5 1979 286,000 - Galena, Ill.' 1952 844,1009 - Green Bay Levee and Drainage District No. 2, Iowa' 1949 299,000 - Green Bay Levee and Drainage District No. 2, Iowa' 1967 1,727,711 - Gregory Drainage District, Mo.' 1940 77,100 - Gregory Drainage District, Mo.' 1972 1,588,96310 Hannibal, Mo.2 1966 110,933 - Henderson County Drainage District No. 1, Ill.' 1968 1,453,217 - Henderson County Drainage District No. 2, Ill.' 1968 1,043,902 - Henderson County Drainage District No. 3, Ill.' 1949 42,700 - Hennepin Drainage and Levee District, Ill.' 1940 109,593 - Hunt Drainage District and Lima Lake Drainage District, Ill.' 1972 4,772,498 - Indian Grave Drainage District, Ill.' 1972 3,551,961 - Iowa River-Flint Creek Levee District No. 16, Iowa' 1972 6,044,693 - Kishwaukee River at DeKalb, Ill." 4 1957 123,300 - Lacey, Langellier, West Mantanzas and Kerton Valley Drainage and Levee District, Ill.' 1954 1,290,0003, 6 - Liverpool Drainage and Levee District, Ill.' 1943 117,731 - Lost Creek Drainage and Levee District, Ill.' 1938 - - Marion County Drainage District, Mo.'' 1967 873,748 - Marshalltown, Iowa' 1978 8,412,40513 Mason and Menard Drainage District, Ill.' 1940 93,808 - Meredosia Levee and Drainage District, Ill.', 4 1977 1,995,322"- Muscatine, Iowa (Mad Creek)', 4 1962 1,193,154 - Muscatine Island Levee District and Muscatine-Louisa County Drainage District No. 13, Iowa' 1970 3,293,27612 Near Springfield on Sangamon River, Ill.' 1941 - - Oakford Special Drainage District, Ill.' 1940 38,417 - Okabena Creek at Worthington, Minn.', 4 1957 72,432 - 28-15 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 28-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (Continued) (See Section 26 of Text) For Last Cost to September 30, 1980 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Ottumwa, Iowa' 1977 233,145 - Pekin and La Marsh Drainage and Levee District, Ill.' 1955 158,383 - Penny Slough, Rock River, Ill.' 1940 85,800 - Peoria, Ill.1" 1973 534,480 - Rock Island, Ill.' 1979 7,560,592 - Rocky Ford Drainage and Levee District, Ill.' 1941 108,797 - Sabula, Iowa' 1958 411,915 - Sangamon River (mouth) Ill.' 1980 1,048,9907,18 503,52619 SeaHorn Drainage and Levee District, Ill.' 1945 32,281 - Sid Simpson Project, Ill.' 1968 5,789,800 - Sny Basin, Ill.' 1972 14,003,560 - Sny Island Levee Drainage District, Ill.' 1942 61,400 - Sny Island Levee Drainage District, Ill.' 1968 4,956,749 - South Beardstown and Valley Drainage and Levee District, Ill.' 1942 220,729 - South Beardstown Drainage and Levee District, Ill.' 1942 171,839 - South Beloit, Ill.' 1979 270,000 - South Quincy Drainage and Levee District, Ill.' 1940 61,200 - South Quincy Drainage and Levee District, Ill.' 1968 1,231,243 - South River Drainage District, Mo.' 1941 55,300 - South River Drainage District, Mo.' 1966 1,106,056 - Spring Lake Drainage and Levee District, Ill.' 1941 185,980 - Subdistrict No. 1 of Drainage Union No. 1 and Bay Island Drainage and Levee District No. 1, Ill.' 1967 3,306,695 - Union Township Drainage District, Mo.' 1947 116,576 - Van Meter, Iowa' 44 1965 113,842 - William L. Springer Lake, Ill.'4 1979 4,911,310 - 1. Completed. 10. Excludes $20,626 contributed funds. 2. Planning discontinued because of lack of local 11. Excludes $269,739 contributed funds. support. 12. Excludes $220,000 contributed funds. 3. Includes $885,000 for disbursement in connection 13. Excludes $252,136 contributed funds. with realignment of Interstate Highway 35. 14. Inactive status since 1975 due to lack of economic 4. Authorized by Chief of Engineers (sec. 205, 1948 justification. Flood Control Act). 15. Inactive status since 1971 due to lack of local 5. No structural measures recommended; planning support. discontinued. 16. Authorized in Flood Control Act of 1962. 6. Inactive status since 1975 due to lack of economic 17. Excludes 15,122 contributed funds. justification. 18. Excludes $764,490 for previous project. 7. Excludes $23,323 contributed funds. 19. Includes $230,678 for previous project. 8. Excludes $145,415 contributed funds. 20. Reclassified "Inactive" because of State and local 9. Excludes $118,000 contributed funds. opposition. 28-16 ROCK ISLAND, ILL., DISTRICT TABLE 28-F FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood Control Activities pursuant to section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization) (See Section 27 of Text) Study Identification Cost During Period Hamilton Drainage District, Polk County, Iowa $ 85 La Porte City, Iowa 331 Ralston Creek, Iowa City, Iowa 131 Rock River-Green Rock, Ill. 32 South Branch of Kishwaukee River at Sycamore, Ill. 1,196 TABLE 28-F Snagging and Clearing Navigable Streams and Tributaries in the Interest of Flood Control (Sec. 208, 1954 Flood Control Act, P.L. 780, 83rd Congress) Project and Location Fiscal Year Costs Bear Creek, Hannibal, Mo. $ 1,338 Fox River, Van Buren County, Iowa 9,990 Fort Madison, Iowa 17,349 Skunk River, Mahaska County, Iowa 36,254 TABLE 28-F Emergency Bank Protection (Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Congress) Project and Location Fiscal Year Costs Appanoose Township, Hancock County, Ill. $ 3,530 Eldon, Des Moines River, Iowa 946 Farmington, Des Moines River, Iowa 22,312 Fox River, Clark County, Mo. 26,980 St. Francisville Bridge, Des Moines River, Iowa and Missouri 53,000 TABLE 28-G FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency flood control activities - repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation) (See Section 27 of Text) Project and Location Federal Cost Advance Preparation $120,648 Rehabilitation: Billmeyer-McConnell Levee, Ill. 9,097 Bradford Levee, Ill. 4,659 Brooks Levee No. 1, Ill. 16,788 Bunchman Levee, Ill. 6,426 Chris Frank Levee No. 1, Ill. 18,954 Cincinnati Drainage and Levee District, Ill. 13,372 Dobey Levee, Ill. 6,742 E. Franks Levee No. 1, Ill. 8,454 28-17 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 28-G FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (Continued) Emergency flood control activities -- repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation) (See Section 27 of Text) Project and Location Federal Cost E. J. Cullinam Levee, Ill. 7,961 Ellison Creek Levees, Ill. 16,568 Goeken-Garman Levee, Ill. 24,503 Hinman-Bouris Levee, Ill. 6,297 Hoffman Levee, Ill. 8,242 Iungerich Levee No. 1, Ill. 13,155 Iungerich Levee No. 2, Ill. 4,855 Judy-Dunham Levee, Ill. 12,923 Maurer-Woodrow Levee, Ill. 15,165 McMullen-Beebe-Twohig Levee, Ill. 5,115 Moorehead Levee, Ill. 11,448 Morris-Winkler-Cullinam Levee, Ill. 26,350 Murphy Levee, Ill. 4,011 Robert C. Williams Levee, Ill. 17,319 St. Francisville Levee, Mo. 180 Stout-Lipkin Levee, Ill. 6,627 TABLE 28-H ILLINOIS WATERWAY: EXISTING AND PROPOSED LOCKS AND DAMS (See Section 1 of Text) Depth on Dimensions Miter Sills at Low Water Available Lift at Miles Width of Length for Low Above Chamber Full Width Water' Lower Upper Lock Mouth Miles to Nearest Town (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) LaGrange Lock 80.2 7.8 below Beardstown, Ill. 110 600 10.0 13.0 15.5 Duplicate Lock3 80.2 7.8 below Beardstown, Ill. 110 1,200 10.0 13.0 15.5 Peoria Lock 157.7 4.1 below Peoria, Ill. 110 600 11.0 12.0 15.5 Duplicate Lock 3 157.7 4.1 below Peoria, Ill. 110 1,200 11.0 14.0 14.0 Starved Rock Lock 231.0 Utica, Ill. 110 600 18.5 14.0 16.8 Duplicate Lock3 231.0 Utica, Ill. 110 1,200 18.5 14.0 13.0 Marseilles Lock 244.6 Marseilles, Ill. 110 600 24.45 14.0 18.6 Duplicate Lock3 244.6 Marseilles, Ill. 110 1,200 24.25 14.0 12.75 Dresden Island Lock 271.5 8 above Morris, Ill. 110 600 21.75 12.25 16.85 Duplicate Lock3 271.5 8 above Morris, Ill. 110 1,200 21.75 14.0 13.0 Brandon Road Lock 286.0 Joliet, Ill. 110 600 34.0 13.8 17.85 Duplicate Lock3 286.0 Joliet, Ill. 110 1,200 34.0 14.0 14.0 Lockport Lock 291.1 Lockport, Ill. 110 600 30.5-39.52 15.0 11.0-20.02 Duplicate Lock3 291.1 Lockport, Ill. 110 1,200 30.5-39.52 14.0 14.6 T.J. O'Brien Lock 326.5 Chicago, Ill. 110 1,000 - 14.0 14.0 Grand Calumet River 329.5 Hammond, Ind. 110 1,000 - 14.0 14.0 1. Lifts and depth on miter sills are those obtained with port is due to fluctuation of water surface in the sanitary flat pools. district canal. 2. Variation in lift and depth on upper miter sill at Lock- 3. Proposed. 28-18 ROCK ISLAND, ILL., DISTRICT TABLE 28-I ILLINOIS WATERWAY, ILL. AND IND. LOCK AND DAM CONSTRUCTION, FOUNDATIONS, COST (See Section 1 of Text) Lock Dam Estimated Federal Cost Under Type of Character of Type of Character of Year Existing Name Construction Foundation Kind Construction Foundation Complete Project Illinis Rivera - - - - - - $ 27334991 mouth to Utica; channel improvement by dredging in Illinois River below Starved Rock, modification of two U.S. locks and dams, and removal of two State dams. LaGrange Duplicate Lock 4 Peoria Duplicate Lock4 Starved Rock Duplicate Lock4 Marseilles Duplicate Lock4 Dresden Island Duplicate Lock4 Brandon Road Pool Lowering 4 Lockport Duplicate Lock 4 T.J. O'Brien Concrete Piles in sand Movable Concrete Piles in sand (wicket and timber with Aframe- crest) Concrete Piles in sand Concrete Piles in sand and timber Concrete Piles in sand Movable Concrete Piles in sand (wicket and timber type) Concrete Concrete Piles in sand Rock Concrete Rock Concrete Rock Concrete Rock Concrete Rock Concrete Rock Concrete Rock Concrete Rock Concrete Rock Concrete Concrete and sheet piling Movable (tainter gates) Movable (tainter gates) Movable (tainter gates) Movable (tainter gates) Concrete and structural steel Concrete and structural steel Concrete and structural steel Concrete and structural steel Movable Concrete (Bear trap)2 and structural steel Rock Piles in clay Fixed3 Concrete and sheet piling Rock Rock Rock Rock Rock 1939 1939 1933 1933 1933 1933 1933 Piles in clay 1960 2,744,5921 97,630,000 3,381,0301 100,802,000 885,3151 97,338,000 1,853,7251 107,545,000 2,503,3761 79,681,000 2,031,6831 216,996,000 133,6081 241,008,000 6,954,7001 28-19 , vv)z, vv REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 28-I ILLINOIS WATERWAY, ILL. AND IND. (Continued) LOCK AND DAM CONSTRUCTION, FOUNDATIONS, COST (See Section 1 of Text) Lock Dam Estimated Federal Cost Under Type of Character of Type of Character of Year Existing Name Construction Foundation Kind Construction Foundation Complete Project Lock and dam - - - - - - 1,250,3041 equipment Total Locks - - - - - - $965,511,832 and dams 1. Actual cost. 4. Planning on the Duplicate Locks is being held in 2. Six dams completed by the Corps; 48-foot bear trap abeyance awaiting reaffirmation of local cooperation supat Lockport completed by State of Illinois. port by the State. 3. Control works. TABLE 28-J ILLINOIS WATERWAY, ILL. AND IND. ADDITIONAL FEATURES ENTERING INTO COST (See Section 1 of Text) Dredging: Little Calumet and Calumet Rivers Calumet-Sag, 3 passing places Starved Rock to Lockport Starved Rock to Grafton Calumet-Sag Channel Peoria small boat harbor Protection piers at all locks Calumet-Sag modification engineering and design Calumet-Sag modification, supervision and administration Rebuild highway bridges Rebuild railway bridges: Calumet-Sag Channel Little Calumet and Calumet Rivers Recreation Facilities, Code 711 Removal of Blue Island lock Grand Calumet River controlling works 2 St. Louis District Total additional features Total existing project 1. Actual cost. $ 2,135,3581 813,4181 3,650,635 2,686,307 19,238,200 24,9371 77,6131 5,141,474 5,466,804 19,327,850 20,828,4351 18,362,0411 445,000 288,6001 1,081,6001 $ 99,569,604 $1,065,082,436 2. Placed in inactive status 19 November 1974. 28-20 ROCK ISLAND, ILL., DISTRICT TABLE 28-K EXISTING PROJECTS See Section in Text Project Item Length Width (feet) Depth (feet) 1. Illinois Waterway, Nine locks and six dams with duplicate - - - Ill. and Ind. locks at seven locations Grafton to Lockport, Ill. 291.1 miles 300 9 Lockport to controlling works 2.0 miles 200-300 9 Controlling works to junction with 10.0 miles 225 9 Calumet-Sag Channel Calumet-Sag Channel to lock in Blue 16.0 miles 225 9 Island Calumet and Little Calumet Channel, 7.7 miles 300 9 from Blue Island to turning basin 5 Grand Calumet River Channel from 9.0 miles 9 - junction with Little Calumet River to and in Indiana Harbor Canal to 141st, East Chicago, Ind. Also, Grand Calumet River Channel 4.2 miles 160 9 from junction of Indiana Harbor Canal and Grand Calumet River to Clark St. in Gary, Ind., with a turning basin at Clark St. A channel in Chicago Sanitary and 22.1 miles 175-300 9 Ship Canal and South Branch Chicago River from Sag-Junction to Lake St. in Chicago, Ill. TABLE 28-L ILLINOIS WATERWAY, ILL. AND IND. THE TOTAL COST OF EXISTING PROJECT TO SEPTEMBER 30, 1981 (See Section 1 of Text) New Work Maintenance Rehabilitation Total Regular Funds $118,317,640 $161,868,834 $16,913,051 $297,099,525 Public Works Funds 3,960,735 - - 3,960,735 Emergency Relief Funds 1,858,936 - - 1,858,936 Total $124,137,311 $161,868,834 $16,913,051 $302,919,1961 1. Includes $1,735,890 expended between 1927 and 1936 under the provisions of the permanent indefinite appropriaon the operation and care of the works of improvement tion for such purposes. 28-21 MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS, MINN.* Section of river covered in this report is divided into three reaches, under supervision and direction of District Engineers at St. Louis, Rock Island, and St. Paul. Section in St. Louis District extends 105 miles from Mouth of Missouri River to mile 300 above Ohio River; Rock Island District extends about 314 miles from mile 300 to 614; and St. Paul District extends about 244 miles from mile 614 to Soo Line Railroad bridge, Minneapolis. Location. Mississippi River rises in northern part of Minnesota, flows about 2,360 miles southerly and empties into Gulf of Mexico. Portion included in this report extends about 663 miles from mouth of Missouri River to Soo Line Railroad bridge, Minneapolis. Latest map and profile showing this section of river is in House Document 669, 76th Congress, 3d session. A map showing Lake Pepin is in House Document 511, 79th Congress, 2d session. A map of section Minneapolis to Dubuque is in House Document 515, 79th Congress, 2d session. A map showing location of drainage districts (Bellevue, Iowa, to Missouri River) is in Rivers and Harbors Committee Document 34, 75th Congress, 1st session. Previous projects. See page 1199 of Annual Report for 1963. Existing project. Provides for a channel of 9-foot depth and adequate width between mouth of Missouri River (1,179 miles from the gulf) and Soo Line Railroad at Minneapolis, by construction of a system of locks and dams, supplemented by dredging. Project also provides for further improvements at St. Paul to provide a basin extending downstream from Robert Street Bridge for 2.7 miles, and at Minneapolis to provide adequate terminal facilities, and for other harbor improvements and miscellaneous work. Pertinent data on locks and dams, harbor improvements, additional features entering into cost of project, and authorizing legislation are given in Tables 29-C, 29-D, 29-E and 29-G. All dams are concrete. Three dams (Upper St. Anthony Falls, 1 and 19) are fixed, remainder are movable. Estimated cost for new work (1981) is $894,157,300 exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects. See House document 669, 76th Congress, 3d session, for a report of Chief of Engineers dated February 27, 1940, containing a general plan for improvement of Mississippi River between Coon Rapids Dam and mouth of Ohio River for purposes of navigation, power development, flood control, and irrigation needs. Local cooperation. Small-boat harbors authorized in the River and Harbor Act of 1962 are subject to conditions that local interests make a cash contribution toward cost of construction (except in case of Quincy Harbor which involves maintenance only of an existing harbor); furnish lands and rights-of-way for construction and future maintenance; hold the United States free from damages; provide and maintain mooring facilities and utilities; reserve accommodations for transient small boats; accomplish all necessary relocations or alterations; and establish public bodies empowered to regulate use, growth, and development of harbors. Rectification of seepage damages to privately owned lands in the Sny Island Levee Drainage District, Ill., is subject to the conditions that local interests acquire all lands, easements, and rights-of-way necessary for construction and maintenance of the project; comply with applicable provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970; accept, operate, and maintain the project * All cost and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 29-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 upon its completion; and hold and save the United States free from damages arising from the construction and operation of the completed project; provided further that the local public entity shall be reimbursed by the Government in the amounts actually expended by it in the acquisition of real estate and for payments required under Public Law 91-646 if said amounts have been previously submitted to and approved by the Government. Local cooperation requirements for improvement of commercial harbor at Dubuque, Iowa; for improvement of Beaver Slough at Clinton, Iowa, for navigation; and for general navigation facilities at small-boat harbors at Rock Island, Ill.; Hannibal, Mo.; Fort Madison, Iowa; Davenport (Lindsay Park), Iowa; Muscatine, Iowa (including freight terminal approach channel); Andalusia, Ill.; Warsaw, Ill.; Moline, Ill.; and Clinton, Iowa, have been complied with. Licenses. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission collects from non-Federal licensees annually to recompensate the United States for use of Government dams for generation of hydroelectric power. Amounts collected are returned to U.S. Treasury. (See table at end of chapter for license fees collected through fiscal year 1981.) Terminal facilities. Considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. St. Paul District, New Work: Studies were continued under Section 107, small navigation project authority, for establishment of small-boat harbors at Lake City, Minnesota at a cost of $32,552, at Pike Island, Minnesota at a cost of $50,461 and at Trempealeau, Wisconsin at a cost of $75,968. Construction of sanitary facilities at Blackhawk Park in pool 9 cost $8,996 by contract and $4,934 by hired labor. Construction contracts for recreation facilities at Lake Rebecca in pool 2 were initiated for relocations and Phase I and Phase II work at a cost of $172,000, $389,804, and $213,010, respectively. Engineering and design cost $46,885 and supervision and administration cost $20,833. Total costs for recreation facilities at Lake Rebecca were $842,532. Maintenance: Channel dredging to remove shoal areas was performed. Government pipeline dredge WILLIAM A. THOMPSON removed 199,500 cubic yards of material at 5 locations at a cost of $1,094,990. Government derrick barge HAUSER removed 118,900 cubic yards of material at 10 locations for $794,311. Other dredging and snagging cost $76,634 by hired labor and $107,342 by contract. Water quality testing for dredging cost $236,533. Dewatering operations and repair work were conducted at Lower St. Anthony Falls for $40, at Lock and Dam No. 2 for $2,760, at Lock and Dam No. 3 for $673,933, and at Lock and Dam No. 5A for $34,183. Sandblasting and painting at locks and dams cost $813,731. A bridge rehabilitation contract at Lock and Dam No. 1 cost $35,000. An upper guidewall extension contract at Lock and Dam No. 1 cost $7,500. Scour repair contracts cost $979,553. A wall stabilization contract at Lock and Dam No. 5 cost $236,575. Engineering work and miscellaneous surveys, reports, and other work were carried on by hired labor for $387,235 and by contract for $55,478. Total cost of maintenance was $8,478,497. Rehabilitation: Stage 1 work for rehabilitation of Lock and Dam No. 1 was accomplished by contract at a cost of $15,332,602. Government furnished materials for hydraulic machinery, wall armor, structural equipment, and miscellaneous metals cost $176,896. Other miscellaneous contracts and hired labor for construction cost $59,654. Engineering and design cost $122,242 by contract and $1,060,082 by hired labor. Supervision and administration cost $796,444. Total rehabilitation costs were $17,547,920. Operating and Care: Locks and dams were operated as required, and necessary repairs were made to those and appurtenant structures. Other studies, reports, and miscellaneous engineering work were also accomplished. Total cost of operating and care was $8,606,667. Costs to St. Paul District were $1,015,443 for new work, $17,085,164 for operation and maintenance, and $17,547,920 for rehabilitation, for a total of $35,648,527. Rock Island District. New work: Preconstruction planning for small boat harbor at Savanna, Ill., was continued at a cost of $17,724. Recreational work along the Mississippi River in Pools 13 and 21 was continued at a cost of $171,415. Maintenance: Channel dredging by Government cutterhead pipeline dredge WILLIAM A. 29-2 MISSISSIPPI RIVER, MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS, MINN. THOMPSON was performed at various locations in pools 16, 18, 19, 22, and upper 24 at a cost of $584,100, of which $158,700 was expended against separate appropriation 96x 5125, Maintenance and Operations funds. A total of 147,067 cubic yards of material were removed at these locations. Pre and post dredge disposal at various dredging sites by contract and hired labor cost $156,800. Other environmental concerns in connection with channel maintenance activities cost $199,900, and included mussel studies and sampling of tagged dredged material. Mechanical channel dredging was completed in Pool 11 at Cassville, Wisconsin, at a cost of $123,600 by the Derrick Barge HAUSER which removed 16,795 cubic yards of material. Pre and post dredge disposal by contract and hired labor at this site cost $56,700. Small boat harbor and access channel dredging was completed at Rock Island small boat harbor at a cost of $44,300 with 10,600 cubic yards of material removed; at Hannibal small boat harbor at cost of $29,600 with 8,500 cubic yards of material removed; at Andalusia small boat harbor at cost of $20,900 with 6,000 cubic yards of material removed; at Moline small boat harbor at cost of $1,100 with 150 cubic yards of material removed; and at small boat harbor Squaw Chute at Quincy at a cost of $50,100 with 2000 cubic yards of material removed. Other excavation, including snagging and clearing, was completed by hired labor in five pools at a cost of $15,100. Repair of regulating works, primarily in pools 18, 22, and upper pool 24 was performed at a cost of $1,218,185. Structural repairs to roller and tainter dam gates, including redecking of service bridges, was performed at a cost of $11,200. Painting of service bridge and dam gates was performed by hired labor at a cost of $81,700. Painting of service bridge and crane by contract cost $175,600, of which $157,600 was expended against separate appropriation 96 x 5125, Maintenance and Operation of Dams. The amount of $27,400 was expended for installation of traveling mooring kevels at one lock site. Repair of lock gates at six locks cost $619,600, and other lock structural maintenance and repairs cost $107,300. Repairs to both lock and dam structures damaged by towboats were performed at 12 lock and dam sites at a cost of $860,200. Levee repairs were performed at a cost of $2,700. Maintenance of public use areas was performed at a cost of $379,100, and repairs and replacements of permanent operating equipment cost $108,300. Contractors earned $290,300 for erection of new maintenance and shop buildings at Locks and Dams 11, 12, 16, and 17. Building maintenance and other maintenance work at various sites was performed at a cost of $44,000. Contractor earned $242,600 for upper approach bank protection at Lock and Dam 21. Contractor earned $94,700 for work on raising access road to Lock and Dam 20. Engineering and design work totaled $83,600. Supervision and administration and district overhead for the maintenance features totaled $639,900. Net credits to the project were $181,800 primarily as a result of collection of damages from towboat companies to lock and dam structures. Rehabilitation: Rehabilitation of auxiliary lock at Lock and Dam 14 was continued at a cost of $1,397,204. Construction of permanent closure of Old Lock 19 was completed at a cost of $2,117. Operating and Care: Operation of the locks and dams and routine maintenance and minor repairs thereto were performed at a cost of $4,839,400. Project cost for operation of the OMNI Computer System (Operation and Maintenance of Navigational Installations) was $336,300. This system was developed by Rock Island District for various functions, primarily for the Performance Monitoring System (PMS) of monitoring lockage data and movement of vessels data through the locks and dams. Real estate management services were provided at a cost of $140,800, operation and contracted maintenance of public use areas were performed at a cost of $562,700; amount of $40,200 was expended on Master Plans; contract law enforcement at public use areas cost $12,300; natural resource management costs were $95,300; surveys, studies, structural inspections, and miscellaneous studies were performed at a cost of $214,300; water control management costs were $595,400. Hydrographic channel surveys and channel inspection and patrol of the project were performed at a cost of $175,200. Supervision and administration and district overhead for operations features totaled $1,053,600. Cost to Rock Island District were $189,139 for new work, $14,152,285 for operation and maintenance, $1,395,087 for rehabilitation for a total of $15,736,511. 29-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 St. Louis District. New work: Costs incurred for New Lock and Dam 26 were $306,593 for real estate management, $2911 for relocations, $20,000 for reservoirs, $13,766,735 for dams, $159,620 for channels and canals, $281,991 for building, grounds and utilities, $290,000 for levees and floodwalls, $3,509,300 for engineering, and $1,477,028 for supervision and administration. Total cost of new work was $19,814,178. Maintenance: Costs incurred for the year were $1,182,689 for dredging 667,258 cubic yards; a credit of $11,640 for collection of subsistence; $820,966 for maintenance and repair of dams; $726,658 for maintenance and repair of locks; a credit of $200,558 for repairs to lock and dam structures damaged by towboats; $56,883 for permanent operating equipment; $248 for buildings, grounds, and utilities; $188,319 for engineering and design; and $325,601 for supervision and administration. Total cost of maintenance was $3,446,550. Operating and care: The locks and dams were operated as required, and necessary repairs were made thereto and to appurtenant structures at a cost of $3,156,350. GREAT studies totaled $347,384. Costs to St. Louis District were $19,814,080 for new work and $6,602,900 for operation and maintenance for a total of $26,416,980. Condition at end of fiscal year. The 9-foot channel as a whole is about 89 percent complete. For information pertaining to locks, dams and harbors, see tables at end of chapter. St. Paul District. Work completed: Locks and Dams at St. Anthony Falls and Nos. 1 to 10, inclusive, except for relatively minor appurtenant work; major improvements of channels and harbors at St. Paul and Minneapolis; commercial harbors at Lake City, Red Wing, and Winona, Minn.; and Prairie du Chien, Wis.; small-boat harbors at St. Paul, Hastings, Red Wing, Wabasha, and Winona, Minn.; Lansing, Iowa; and Bay City, Pepin, and Prairie du Chien, Wis.; a remedial drainage ditch at Cochrane, Wis.; miscellaneous channel dredging and realignment; channel markers; pool clearing; and construction of various facilities for recreation use. Seepage damages totaling $90,027 were paid to 210 claimants. Status of land and flowage acquisition: Approximately 50,293.54 acres of land in fee, including 47,305 acres used by the Department of the Interior in accordance with a cooperative agreement and general plans, and easements of 15,549.63 acres of land are owned and controlled in pools 1 to 10, inclusive, at end of fiscal year. In addition, fee title to 12.46 acres and perpetual easements on 2.98 acres of land for St. Anthony Falls and perpetual easements over 244.39 acres of land for harbors have been obtained and Department of the Army holds special rights over 62,954.74 acres owned by Department of the Interior in pools Nos. 3 to 10, inclusive. Land acquisition is complete. Work remaining to complete portion of project in St. Paul District: Guidewall extension at Lock No. 3 (the uncompleted guidewall extensions at Locks Nos. 4, 5, 5A, 7, 8, 9 and 10 were reclassified from the "active" to the "inactive" category on April 13, 1973); realignment of channel at Wilds Bend; construction of small-boat harbor at St. Paul (Harriet Island), Minn.; and construction of additional recreational facilities. Condition of channel on 30 September 1981 was such that controlling depths of 9 feet at low water and minimum widths for long-haul common carrier service were available in all pools. Except for Lock No. 1 which is in poor condition due to age and obsolescence, structures are in good condition. Rehabilitation of Lock No. 1 is underway. Rock Island District. Work completed: Major construction items, including all locks and dams, are completed and in operation. Other work remaining consists of construction of guidewall extensions at Nos. 16, 18, and 21; mooring facilities at Nos. 11, 12, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 22; upper approach improvement at No. 19; upper approach dike at No. 20; removal of remainder of lateral dam in Pool No. 14; rock and/or conglomerate excavation in Pools Nos. 14, 15, 18, 19, and 21; rectification of seepage damages in Sny Island Levee Drainage District, IL.; and construction of smallboat harbors at Savanna, Ill.; New Boston, Ill.; and Keokuk, Iowa; and construction of commercial harbor at Fort Madison, IA, and additional recreational facilities. Status of land and flowage acquisition: Acquis- 29-4 MISSISSIPPI RIVER, MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS, MINN. ition of land in Pools Nos. 11 to 22, inclusive, consisting of 93,601 acres in fee and 10,541 acres in flowage easement, has been completed. Condition of the channel on 30 Sept. 1981, was such that controlling depths of 9 feet at low water and widths suitable for long-haul common carrier service were being maintained in all pools. St. Louis District. Work completed: Locks and Dams Nos. 24, 25, and 26 (Henry T. Rainey Dam), except for guidewall extensions at Locks Nos. 24 and 25, have been completed as have recreation facilities at the three pools. Payments for rectification of damages have been completed. Other work remaining consists of construction of guidewall extensions at Locks Nos. 24 and 25 and replacement of Lock and Dam 26. Status of land and flowage acquisitions. Acquisition of lands in Pools Nos. 24, 25, and 26, involving 41,451 acres of land in fee and flowage easements over 6,600 acres, is complete. A total of 1,466 acres have been acquired for Lock and Dam No. 26 replacement project. Condition of channel on 30 Sept. 1981 was such that controlling depth of nine feet at low water and generally suitable widths for long-haul common carrier services were maintained in all pools and between Locks and Dam, No. 26 and Missouri River. Total Federal cost of existing project to 30 Sept. 1981 for the three Districts was $778,081,737 of which $277,355,064 was for new work, ($202,608,760 regular funds, $51,895,959 public works funds and $22,850,345 emergency relief funds), $451,436,803 regular funds for maintenance and $49,289,870 regular funds for rehabilitation. 29-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS, MINN. TABLE 29-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Total Cost to Project Funding FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 Sept. 30, 1981 Mississippi River New work between Missouri Approp. 418,000 553,000 32,842,076 39,047,000 337,805,009 River and Cost 123,878 459,312 32,004,732 21,018,662 318,825,0151 Minneapolis, Maint. Minnesota Approp. 44,428,500 43,184,681 35,160,441 36,767,200 461,472,630 (Federal Funds) Cost 45,552,291 38,187,969 36,254,662 37,840,349 457,991,528 Rehab. Approp. 4,618,000 9,200,000 17,417,000 17,867,000 49,493,035 Cost 3,300,739 9,154,112 17,850,815 18,943,000 49,289,870 (Contributed, New Work Funds) Approp. - 59,000 0 - 1,287,541 Cost - 16,661 42,338 - 1,287,540 'Includes $41,469,955 for new work on previous projects. TABLE 29-B TOTAL COSTS OF EXISTING PROJECT TO SEPTEMBER 30, 1981 Regular Public Work Emergency District Cost Funds Funds Relief Funds Total St. Paul New Work' $58,782,7822 $24,210,071 $9,071,214 $92,064,067 District Maintenance 3 174,349,547 - - 174,349,547 Rehabilitation 36,427,701 - - 36,427,701 Total 269,560,030 24,210,071 9,071,214 302,841,315 Rock Island New Work4 64,579,102 17,403,322 11,338,865 93,321,289 District Maintenance 157,468,118 - - 157,468,118 Rehabilitation 12,862,169 - - 12,862,169 Total 234,909,989 17,403,322 11,338,865 263,651,576 St.Louis New Work 79,246,876 10,282,5669 2,440,266 91,969,708 Maintenance 119,619,138 - - 119,619,138 Total 198,866,014 10,282,566 2,440,266 211,588,846 'Excludes $1,228,541 contributed funds. Includes $7,673 5$687,709 was transferred to St. Louis District in fiscal expended in pool No. 11. year 1958. Excludes $201,167 transferred to St: Paul and St. 2Includes $159,359 transferred from Rock Island District Louis Districts covering their pro rata shares of cost of derrick covering pro rata share of cost of derrick boat Hercules. boat Hercules. 3Includes $762,196 expended between 1930 and 1936 on operating and care of works of improvement under provisions 9Includes $47,800 transferred from Rock Island District of permanent indefinite appropriation for such purposes. covering pro rata cost of derrick boat Hercules and $687,709 4Excludes $58,999 contributed funds. transferred from Rock Island District. 29-6 Lock Dimensions Greatest Estimated Length Percent Cost Width Avail- Upper Depth on Character of Foundation Complete Year of Each Lock Miles of ale for Normal Miter Sill Locks, Opened and Dam Lock Above Chamin- FKULL Iool Dams, to Including and Ohio Miles from ber Width Lift Eleva- Upper Lower and Work Navi- Work Dam River Nearest Town (feet) (feet) (feet) tion' (feet) (feet) Lock Dam in Pool gation in Pool St. Anthony 853.9 In city of Minne- 56 Falls, upper apolis, Minn. lock St. Anthony 853.3 In city of Minne- 56 Falls, lower apolis, Minn. lock and dam Lock and dam 1 847.6 Minneapolis- 56 St. Paul 56 Lock and dam 2 815.2 1.3 above 110 Hastings, Minn. 1108 Lock and dam 3 796.9 6.1 above 110 Red Wing, Minn. Lock and dam 4 752.8 Alma, Wis. 11 Lock and dam 5 738.1 Minneiska, Minn. 10 Lock and dam 5A 728.5 3 above Winona, 110 Minn. Lock and dam 6 714.3 Trempealeau, Wis. 110 Lock and dam 7 702.5 Dresbach, Minn. 110 Lock and dam 8 679.2 Genoa, Wis. 110 Lock and dam 9 647.9 3.3 below 110 Lynxville, Wis. Lock and dam 10 615.1 Guttenberg, Iowa 110 Lock and dam 11 583.0 3.7 above 110 Dubuque, Iowa Lock and dam 12 556.7 Bellevue, Iowa 110 Lock and dam 13 522.5 4.3 above Clinton, 110 Iowa Lock and dam 14 493.3 3.7 below 110 Le Claire, Iowa Le Claire lock 493.1 3.9 below 80 (Canal) Le Claire, Iowa Lock and dam 15 482.9 Foot of Arsenal 110 Island Rock 110 Island, Ill. 1002 - $18,203,0003 100 1959 12,382,0005 400 49.2 799.2 15.7 13.7 Some limestone, Limestone mainly sandstone. No piles. 400 26.94 750.0 13.7 10.3 Sandstone. No Sandstone piles. 400 35.94 7a5.1 13.54 10.1 Rock and piles Piles in gravel 400 35.9 - 12.57 7.6 in gravel. 500 12.2 - 16.0 15.1 Piles in sand, Piles in sand, 6008 12.2 687.2 22.2 13.0 silt and clay. silt and clay 600 8.0 675.0 17.0 14.0 Piles in sand, Piles in sand silt and clay. 600 7.0 667.0 17.0 13.0 Piles in sand Piles in sand and gravel, and gravel 600 9.0 660.0 18.0 12.0 Piles in sand Piles in sand and gravel. 600 5.5 651.0 18.0 12.5 Piles in sand. Piles in sand 600 6.5 645.5 17.0 12.5 Piles in sand, Piles in sand gravel and silt. a d clay 600 8.0 639.0 18.0 12.0 Piles in sand Piles in sand and gravel. 600 11.0 631.0 22.0 14.0 Piles in sand, Piles in sand gravel, and and gravel broken rock. 600 9.0 620.0 16.0 13.0 Piles in sand. Piles in sand 600 8.0 611.0 15.0 12.0 Piles in sand. Piles in sand 600 11.0 603.0 18.5 12.5 Piles in sand, Piles in sand gravel and silt. 600 9.0 592.0 17.0 13.0 Piles in sand Piles in sand and gravel, and gravel 600 11.0 583.0 19.0 13.0 Piles in sand, Piles in sand clay and gravel, and gravel 600 11.0 572.0 20.5 13.5 Rock. Rock 320 11.0 - 17.6 10.9 Rock. Rock 600 16.0 561.0 24.011 11.0 Rock. Rock 360 16.0 - 17.011 11.0 1917 1930 1948 1938 1935 1935 1936 1936 1937 1937 1938 1936 1937 1938 1938 1939 1922 1934 2,358,0006 6,492,0009 8,286,000 4,865,000* 5,081,000* 8,009,000* 4,874,000 5,574,000* 6,061,000* 6,539,000* 4,750,000* 7,428,000 5,580,000 7,502,000 6,284,000 10 10,525,000 CH) CI) H C CI) 0 M 0 v C MC l J z H Mz Cd r Cl 13 100 100 100 79 100 100 57 100 100 180 180 100 99 99 100 92 100 95 TABLE 29-C LOCKS AND DAMS Lock Dimensions Greatest Percent Estimated Length Depth on Character of Foundation Complete Year Cost Width Avail- Upper Miter Sill Locks, Opened of Each Lock Miles of able for Normal Dams, to and Dam In- Lock Above Cham- Full Pool Upper Lower and Work Navi- cluding and Ohio Miles from ber Width Lift Eleva- (feet) (feet) Lock Dam in Pool gation Work Dam River Nearest Town (feet) (feet) (feet) tion in Pool Lock and dam 16 457.2 1.8 above Muscatine, Iowa Lock and dam 17 437.1 4.2 above New Boston, II. Lock and dam 18 410.5 6.5 above Burlington, Iowa Lock and dam 19 364.2 Keokuk, Iowa Lock and dam 20 343.2 0.9 above Canton, Mo. Lock and dam 21 324.9 2.1 below Quincy, Ill. Lock and dam 22 301.2 1.5 below Saverton, Mo. Lock and dam 24 273.4 Clarksville, Mo. Lock and dam 25 241.4 Cap Au Gris, Mo. Lock and dam 26 202.9 Alton, Ill. (Henry T. Rainey Dam) New Lock and 200.8 Alton, Ill. dam 26 Total, Locks and dams 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 600 9.0 545.0 17.0 600. 8.0 536.0 16.0 600 9.8 528.0 16.5 358 38.2 518.2 4.5 1,200 5.0 600 10.0 480.0 15.0 600 10.5 470.0 16.5 600 10.2 459.5 18.0 600 15.0 449.0 19.0 600 15.0 434.0 19.0 600 24.0 419.0 19.0 360 24.0 - 16.0 1,200 24.0 419.0 23.0 12.0 Piles in sand and gravel. 13.0 Piles in sand and gravel. 13.7 Piles in sand. 9.2 Rock. 13.0 12.0 Rock. 12.0 Piles in sand and gravel. 13.8 Rock. 12.0 Rock and piles. 12.0 Piles in sand and gravel. 10.0 Piles in sand. 10.0 18.0 Piles in bedrock. Piles in sand and gravel Piles in sand Piles in sand Rock Rock and piles in sand and gravel Piles in sand and gravel Rock Piles in sand Piles in sand and gravel Piles in sand Piles in bedrock 1Elevation of pools 1 to 22 and at St. Anthony Falls are mean sea level 1912 adjustment; pools 24, 26 are mean sea level 1929 adjustment. 2Includes existing dam, owned by Northern States Power Co. 3Includes dredging above upper lock. (Federal cost only.) 4Based on pool elevation 723.1 in pool 1 which is crest of dam. Pool is normally maintained at elevation 725.1 by flashboards. 5Includes lower approach dredging and dredging between upper and lower rock. (Federal cost only.) 6In addition $1,948,000 expended from previous projects and $1,349,600 from O & C appropriation for first of twin locks. Excludes lock and dam rehabilitation program. 'Old upper guard sill. 8Landward lock. 9In addition, $1,965,300 expended from previous projects. 10Existing Le Claire Canal lock is used as auxiliary to lock 14; previous project cost $540,000. 11Depthoverupperpoireesill. Depthoveruppermitersillis27 feet, at lock 15. 12$640,868 for first lock was reported by Mississippi River Power Company, transferred to Government free in lieu of improvements destroyed. (AnnualReport, 1928, pp. 1118-1119.) Present estimate includes $13,132,600 for main lock and appurtenant work. 1 3Includes cash contribution of $2,850,000. *Excludes uncompleted guidewall extensions $10,339,000 (1972) reclassified from active to inactive on 13 April 1973. 98 99 90 100 99 97 95 99 62 61 100 1937 1939 1937 1913 1957 1936 1938 1938 1940 1939 1938 9,788,000 5,843,000 10,308,000 14,813,00012 6,281,000 8,065,000 5,275,000 10,337,000 13,694,000 12,824,000 644,850,00013 $872,871,000 0 0C, 0 = Cd z rd Ct v " V W TABLE 29-C (Cont'd) LOCKS AND DAMS TABLE 29-D HARBOR IMPROVEMENTS Name Harriet Island Harbor, St. Paul, Minn. St. Paul Harbor, Minn. Hastings Harbor, Minn. Red Wing Harbor, Minn. Red Wing Harbor, Minn. Bay City Harbor, Wis. Lake City Harbor, Minn. Pepin Harbor, Wis. Wabasha Harbor, Minn. Alma Harbor, Wis. Winona Harbors, Minn. Lansing Harbor, Iowa Prairie du Chien Harbor, Wis. Cassville Harbor, Wis. Dubuque Harbor, Iowa Savanna Harbor, Ill. Clinton Harbor, Iowa Moline Harbor, ll. Davenport Harbor, Iowa (Lindsay Park) Rock Island Harbor, ill. Miles above Ohio River Location 840.2 In city of St. Paul, Minn. 836.5-839.2 In city of St. Paul, 839.7 Minn. Channel improvement, Small-boat harbor and channel enlargement. 813.2 Lower end of city of Hastings, Minn. 791.4 In city of Red Wing, Minn. 791.1 In city of Red Wing, Minn. 785.9 Upper end of Bay City, Wis. 773.0 In city of Lake City, Minn. 767.1 In city of Pepin, Wis. 760.0 Upper end of city of Wabasha, Minn. 751.3 Upper end of Alma, Wis. 726.0 In city of Winona, Minn., Latsch Island 726.2 Crooked Slough 663.3 Upper end of city of Lansing, Iowa 635.5 Upper end of city of Prairie du Chien, Wis. 635.0 In Marais de St. Friol East Channel below Hwy bridges. 606.6 At Cassville 579.4 At Dubuque, Iowa 537.3 At Savanna 519.0 At Clinton 488.0 At Moline, Ill. 484.2 At Lindsay Park 479.8 At Rock Island, ILL. Type Small-boat Commercial Small-boat Small-boat Commercial Small-boat Small-boat Small-boat Commercial Small-boat Small-boat Small-boat Small-boat Commercial Small-boat Small-boat Commercial Small-boat Commercial Small-boat Small-boat Small-boat Small-boat Entrance channel small-boat harbor. Project depth (feet) Approximate size (feet) Width Length 70 925 9 400-1,000 2.7 (mile) 300 400 200 300 450 50-100 400 500 50 175-400 300 200 200 400 400 120 340 280 400 230 200 100 12 5 5 5 5 6 100 100 500 100 1,200 800 5,990 600 1,000 600 800 500 1,000 6,000 800 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 800 100 1,000 frontage 565 1,500 910 1,400 660 1,150 1,100 100 0 100 0 100 100 100 100 Actual or Percent Estimated Complete Cost 0 $231,0001 217,100 230,200 74,300 146,8002 8,700 39,5003 93,500 205,5004 41,700 56,300 89,800 84,70( 95,30C 85,500 93,100 178,000 55,200 310,000 101,9125 110,328 262,100 31,000 TABLE 29-D HARBOR IZMPROVEMENTS CI) CI) CI) CI) 0 zz 0 zd z z' TABLE 29-D (Cont'd) Name HARBOR IMPROVEMENTS Miles above Ohio River Location Project Approximate size (feet) Actual or Type depth Percent Estimated (feet) Width Length Complete Cost Davenport Harbor, Iowa (Credit island) Andalusia Harbor, Ill. Muscatine Harbor, Iowa New Boston Harbor, II. Fort Madison Harbor, Iowa Fort Madison Harbor, Iowa Keokuk Harbor, Iowa Warsaw Harbor, ll. Quincy Harbor, Ill. Hannibal Harbor, Mo. Total 478.7 Credit Island Slough 473.0 455.5 455.6 433.1 383.7 378.3 363.5 359.1 327.3 308.8 Andalusia Slough At Muscatine, Iowa In Boston Bay At Fort Madison, Iowa At Fort Madison At Keokuk, Iowa At Warsaw, Ill. In Quincy Bay At Hannibal, Mo. Small-boat Small-boat 5 Small-boat 5 Freight terminal approach channel 9 Small-boat 5 Small-boat 5 Commercial 9 Small-boat 5 Small-boat 5 Small-boat 5 Small-boat 5 75 1,400 40 150 200 90-135 250 200 100-160 100 200-300 180-260 435 950 1,890 600 900 10,300 1,015 600 9,000 600 1In addition, local interests will contribute $214,000. 2In addition, local interests contributed $3,455. 3In addition, local interests contributed $9,533. 4In addition, local interests contributes $32,344. 5In addtion, local interests contributed $58,999. 6Maintenance only, estimated at $5,000 annually. tD0= r 0 t-a 00 y c Cl) 00 100 1001 0 100 00 100 0 100 130,000 21,000 353,000 23,000 184,200 1,070,000 394,000 73,000 6 129,000 $5,218,740 MISSISSIPPI RIVER, MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS, MINN. TABLE 29-E ADDITIONAL FEATURES ENTERING INTO COST OF PROJECT Facilities for public use, convenience and safety Rectification of damages caused by seepage and backwater Regulating works between lock and dam 26 (Henry T. Rainey Dam) and Missouri River Improvement of Beaver Slough at Clinton, Iowa, for navigation Miscellaneous Total additional features Total existing project $ 3,359,600 7,049,70012 545,000 193,600 1,312,9003 12,460,8004 $894,157,300 1Excludes $205,000 (1955) for remedial works in Sny Island Levee Drainage District, Illinois, to be restudied after completion of Sny Basin flood control project. 2Includes $860,000 (1974) for rectifying seepage damage to privately owned lands in the Sny Island Drainage District, Illinois. 3Includes $686,500 for repairs to Stone Arch bridge, Minneapolis, Minn. (FY 1969). 4Excludes $227,000 (1965) for inactive remedial measures at Sandy Slough, Mo. LICENSE FEES COLLECTED TABLE 29-F THROUGH FISCAL YEAR 1981 Annual Collections to Dam Licensee Charge Sept. 30, 1981 St. Anthony Falls Northern States $ 3,330 $ 63,547 Lower Lock and Dam Power Co. (No. 2056) Lock and Dam No. 1 Ford Motor Co. 95,400 5,344,440 (No. 362) Total project $5,407,987 29-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 29-G Acts Sept. 22, 1922 July 3, 1930 as amended by P.R. No. 10, Feb. 24, 1932 June 26, 1934 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Dec. 22, 1944 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 None Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 July 24, 1946 July 24, 1946 July 24, 1946 July 24, 1946 July 24, 1946 June 30, 1948 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS, MINN. Dredging channels to landing places. Project adopted from Illinois River to Minneapolis; Chief of Engineers granted discretionary authority to make such modification in plan as may be deemed advisable. Operation of snag boats and operation and care of locks and dams to be provided for with funds from Department of the Army appropriations for rivers and harbors. Missouri River established as lower limit of project. Extension of 9-foot channel above St. Anthony Falls, Minn., including adequate terminal facilities for Minneapolis, Minn. St. Paul Harbor. Determine damages to drainage and levee districts caused by seepage and backwater, and cost of making rectification thereof. Public park and recreational facilities. Red Wing, Minn., harbor. Remedial works to correct damages caused by seepage and backwater at Cochrane, Wis. Such changes or additions to payments remedial works, or land acquisitions authorized by River and harbor Act of Aug 26, 1937 (River and Harbor Committee Doc. 34, 75th Cong., 1st sess.), as Chief of Engineers deems advisable. St. Paul, Minn., channel enlargements small boat harbor, and roadway. Vertical bridge clearance at Minneapolis to 26 feet above estimated stage for discharge of 40,000 c.f.s. Winona, Minn., basin. Future modification of lock and dam No. 2 for power development Provides for cash contribution by local interests in lieu of alteration of privately owned bridges and utilities for St. Anthony Falls project. Lake City, Minn., harbor. Wabasha, Minn., harbor Payment of damages caused by backwater and seepage, pools 3 to 11. Hastings, Minn., harbor Lansing, Iowa, harbor. Fort Madison, Iowa, harbors. Payment of damages caused by pool No. 14 at Clinton, Iowa. Davenport, Iowa, harbor. p02H. Doc. 642, 80th Cong., 2d sess. Muscatine, Iowa, harbor. Alma, Wis., harbor Hannibal, Mo., harbor. Prairie du Chien, Wis., harbors. Documents None H. Doc. 290, 71st Cong., 2d sess. None H. Doc. 137, 72nd Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 137, 72nd Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 44, 74th Cong., 1st sess. River and Harbors Committee Doc. 34, 75th Cong., 1st sess. None H. Doc. 103, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 137, 76th Cong., 1st sess. None H. Doc. 547, 76th Cong., 3d sess. S. Doc. 54, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 263, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 432, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 449, 78th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 511, 79th Cong., 2a sess. H. Doc. 514, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 515, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 559, 79th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 192, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 661, 80th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 197, 80th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 733, 80th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 66, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 67, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 71, 81st Cong., 1st sess. 29-12 MISSISSIPPI RIVER, MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS, MINN. TABLE 29-G (Cont'd) Acts May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 Sept. 3, 1954 Sept. 3, 1954 July 3, 1958 July 3, 1958 July 3, 1958 July 3, 1958 Mar. 3, 1909 July 14, 1960 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 Nov. 7, 1966 Nov. 7, 1966 Oct. 21, 1978 1 Deferred. 2 Inactive. AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized Opposite Hamburg, Ill., harbor.1 Permits such change in location of Winona, Minn., small boat basin authorized by River and Harbor Act of Mar. 2, 1945 (H. Doc. 263, 77th Cong., 1st sess.), as Chief of Engineers deems advisable. Construction of Crooked Slough Harbor at Winona, Minn., in lieu of previously authorized commercial harbor. Payment of damages caused by pool No. 24 at Louisiana, Mo. Permits modification of vertical bridge clearances and authorizes completion of St. Anthony Falls project. Small boat and commercial harbors at Alton, 11.2 Payment of lump sum amounts for damages to drainage and levee districts caused by operation of navigation pools. Improvement and maintenance of Beaver Slough at Clinton, Iowa. Reconstruction of structures as may be necessary to provide adequate facilities for existing navigation. Construction of Industrial Harbor at Red Wing, Minn. Construction of small-boat harbors at Savanna 1 Moline, Andalusia, New Boston,' Warsaw, Quincy, and Grafton, Ill.; Bellevue,' Clinton, Davenport, and Koekuk, Iowa; St. Paul (Harriet Island), Minn.; and Bay City, Pepin, and Cassville,1 Wis. Payment of damages caused by pool 24 at Clarksville, Mo. Remedial works at Sandy Slough, Mo. Repair of Stone Arch bridge at Minneapolis, Minn. Commercial Harbor facilities at Fort Madison, Iowa.2 Replacement of Lock and Dam 26 Documents H. Doc. 254, 81st Cong., 1st sess. None H. Doc. 347, 83rd Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 251, 82nd Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 33, 85th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 136, 84th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 135, 84th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 345, 84th Cong., 2d sess. None. H. Doc. 32, 86th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 513, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 552, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 419, 87th Cong., 2d sess. None H. Doc. 507, 89th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 95-502 29-13 CHICAGO, ILLINOIS, DISTRICT* This district comprises Cook, McHenry, Lake, and Lake and Porter Counties in Indiana, includ- Kane, DuPage and Will Counties in Illinois, ing the southern end of Lake Michigan. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page Burns Waterway Harbor, Ind......... 30-2 Calumet Harbor and River, Ill. and Indiana ................... .. 30-2 Chicago Harbor, Ill................ 30-3 Chicago River, Ill. .................. 30-3 Indiana Harbor, Ind.................. 30-4 Michigan City Harbor, Ind........... 30-5 Waukegan Harbor, Ill............. 30-5 Navigation Work Under Special Authorization.............. 30-6 Alteration of Bridges 9. Other authorized Bridge Alteration......................... 30-6 Beach Erosion Control 10. Hollywood-Ardmore Beach Chicago, Ill........................ 30-6 Page 11. Mount Baldy, Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore, Ind........... 30-6 12. Other authorized beach erosion control projects................... 30-7 13. Beach erosion control under special authorization............... 30-7 Flood Control 14. Chicago River, Ill. North Branch...... 30-7 15. Little Calumet River, Ill............ 30-7 16. Other authorized flood control projects..................... 30-7 17. Flood control work under special authorization ........... 30-8 18. 19. 20. General Investigations Surveys............................. 30-8 Collection and study of basic data..... 30-8 Research and development............. 30-8 *All cost and financial statements for projects are listed at end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 30-1 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 Navigation 1. BURNS WATERWAY HARBOR, IND. Location. On Indiana shore of Lake Michigan in Porter County, 18 miles east of Illinois-Indiana State line, 14 miles east of Indiana Harbor, 9 miles east of Gary Harbor, 14 miles west of Michigan City Harbor, Ind., and 19 miles south-east of Calumet Harbor, Ill. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14905.) Existing project. Provides for (a) a north breakwater 4,630 feet long; (b) an outer west bulkhead 1,200 feet long; (c) an approach channel 30 feet deep and 400 feet wide, extending from deep water in Lake Michigan to north end of east bulkhead; (d) an outer harbor 28 feet deep; (e) an east harbor arm 27 feet deep with a width varying from 620 feet to 260 feet wide; (f) a west harbor arm 27 feet deep and 620 feet wide. Project was authorized by 1965 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 160, 88th Cong. 1st sess.) Authorizing act also provides the Secretary of the Army may reimburse State of Indiana for expenditure of funds used to construct such portions of project as approved by Chief of Engineers and constructed under supervision of the Chief of Engineers. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Six wharves and docks are available, three on West Harbor Arm and three on East Harbor Arm. One dock on the west arm is used for shipment and receipt of steel products. One dock on the east arm is used for receipt of bulk supplies for making steel and shipment of steel products. The remaining four facilities are administered by Indiana Harbor Port Commission and used primarily for handling miscellaneous bulk materials and general cargo. Operations and results during period. Maintenance: Condition surveys were performed by hired labor at a cost of $14,999. Inspections and miscellaneous reports were performed at a cost of $214. Breakwater stone, purchased at a cost of $235,630, was placed on the north breakwater and the outer west bulkhead at a cost of $181,999. Supervision and inspection of these activites were performed by hired labor at a cost of $30,624. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of North Breakwater and Outer West Bulkhead was completed in September 1968. Dredging was completed in August 1970. Total costs of existing project to September 30, 1981, were $17,053,780, of which $13,599,990 was for new work ($13,584,000 Federal and $15,990 non-Federal), and $3,453,790 for maintenance. To date there has been no maintenance dredging, and all maintenance costs were incurred repairing the breakwater and bulkhead. The breakwater maintenance repairs were necessary to maintain design elevation of the north breakwater and the outer west bulkhead. 2. CALUMET HARBOR AND RIVER, ILL. AND IND. Location. Northeastern Illinois (Cook County), near southern end of Lake Michigan, 12.5 miles south of Chicago Harbor, and known on Great Lakes as South Chicago Harbor, is in southerly part of and within corporate limits of city of Chicago, except for a part of breakwaters and of anchorages behind same,' which are in Indiana. Calumet River is within Chicago city limits. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14929). For description, see page 1471 of Annual Report for 1932. Previous projects. For details see page 1400 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. (See table 30-C.) For a more detailed description see page 1246 of Annual Report for 1963. Estimated cost for new work (1976) is $33,945,- 000 Federal and $20,726,000 non-Federal, exclusive of amounts expended on previous project. The uncompleted portions of the 1935 and 1945 River and Harbor Acts were deauthorized in 1977. The uncompleted portion of 1960 River and Harbor Act costing $2,700,000 (1972) is considered inactive. (See table 30-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed modifications and acts of 1960 and 1962. For act of August 30, 1935, requirements for dredging in front of U.S. Steel Corp. remains. Terminal facilities. Calumet River and outer harbor: 33 docks handling foreign oversea, lake vessels, and river barge cargoes. Most important cargoes handled are iron ore, grain, petroleum products, coal, limestone, sand, gravel, iron and steel products, salt, and general oversease cargo. There is one boatyard for repairs to large lake vessels with one large drydock. Government owns two docks which are used by the Corps only. There are no other publicly owned docks on Calumet River, except one owned by the City of Chicago. Lake Calumet: Chicago Regional Port District owns and leases to others three transit sheds and two grain elevators. There are also three private docks handling chemicals, iron and steel products, and miscellaneous cargo. Operations and results during period. Maintenance: Condition surveys and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by hired labor at a cost of $25,310. A claim relative to the dredging of the hopper dredge mooring area was resolved at a cost of $170. Supervision and inspection was performed at a cost of $15,225. Under the diked proposal program, site selection studies and 30-2 CHICAGO, ILL., DISTRICT engineering and design were continued at a cost of $275,031. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project is about 79 percent complete. Work remaining to complete project consists of removing hard materials in outer harbor and completing the widening, straightening and deepening of isolated remaining sections of Calumet River. Timber crib breakwater (6,712 feet, completed in 1904; concrete superstructure completed in 1924) is in fair condition. Under permit from the Secretary of War, the Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. and its predecessors removed all of south pier (completed in 1897) and replaced it with a concrete dock wall 2,961 feet long and 50 feet southerly of pier's original location. Under permits from the department, the Defense Plant Corp. built two sections of bulkheads on east side of river between a point opposite the Semet-Solvay slip and south side of former turning basin 3 at about 117th Street. United States widened and deepened the channel adjoining the new bulkhead except through the ock section, where widening was done by the corporation. Head of navigation for deepdraft vessels in the river is at turning basin 5 on north side of 130th Street. Total costs of existing project to September 30, 1981 were $36,800,127, of which $21,722,594 was for new work ($18,685,991 regular funds and $3,036,603 public works .funds), $13,551,865 regular funds for maintenance, $689,001 regular funds for rehabilitation, and $836,667 non-Federal funds. 3. CHICAGO HARBOR, ILL. Location. Northeastern Illinois, near southern end of Lake Michigan; 85 miles southerly from Milwaukee, Wis. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14928.) Previous projects. See page 1396 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. (See table 30-C.) For more detailed description see page 1242 of Annual Report for 1963. Completed Federal cost is $4,342,822, exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects (See table 30-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are seven docks for handling various types of cargo, including overseas general cargo, salt and newsprint. Passenger excursion boats use three docks. There is one marine service dock for pleasure craft and two yacht club docks. City of Chicago owns five docks, four of which are used for commercial purposes. Operations and results during period. Maintenance: Condition surveys, inspections and reports were performed by hired labor at a cost of $2,432. Breakwater stone was purchased at a cost of $95,599. Engineering and design was performed for exterior breakwater at a cost of $15,139. Supervision and inspection of these activities was performed by hired labor at a cost of $27,963. Under the diked disposal program, site selection studies and engineering and design were continued at a cost of $120,158. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project is complete. Northerly arm of inner breakwater (timber 4,034 feet, with 304 feet of shore return on north end, completed in 1875; concrete superstructure completed in 1934) is in good condition except leaking water from Lake Michigan into Chicago River. Southerly arm of inner breakwater (timber 2,544 feet, completed in 1880; concrete superstructure completed in 1930) is in good condition after rehabilitation by conversion to rubblemound completed in August 1966. Exterior breakwater (timber cribs 5,413 feet, completed in 1889; concrete superstructure completed in 1930) is deteriorated under water and was rehabilitated in 1966 by conversion of lake side structure to rubblemeound. Southerly extension north arm (rubblemound 2,213 feet, completed in 1917) is in a deteriorated condition. South arm (rubblemound 1,526 feet, completed in 1920; and concrete caisson 1,185 feet completed in 1922) are in good condition. Shorearm extension (timber cribs 2,250 feet, completed in 1917; inner 1,050 feet capped with concrete superstructure 1951; next adjoining 1,000 feet capped with stone blocks 1956; outer 200 feet capped with concrete superstructure 1952) is in good condition. Channel side of north pier (concrete superstructure, 960 feet, completed in 1908, repaired in 1949, and rebuilt with steel sheet piling in 1965) is in good condition. Water level landward of lock is controlled and maintained at an elevation lower than that of Lake Michigan except during excessive storm runoff. Total costs of existing project to September 30, 1981 were $10,623,207 of which $4,342,822 was for new work, $4,953,785 for maintenance, and $1,326,600 for rehabilitation. 4. CHICAGO RIVER, ILL. Location. Cook and Lake Counties, Ill., navigable portions being wholly in Cook County and city of Chicago. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14928.) For description, see page 1467 of Annual Report for 1932. Previous projects. See page 1394 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. Provides for a channel 21 feet deep in the main river from its mouth at Rush Street to the junction of North and South Branches (0.7 miles), in the North Branch from the junction to North Avenue (2.22 miles), in the North Branch Canal (1.04 miles), and in the North 30-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 Branch Turning Basin just south of North Avenue; and for a channel 9 feet deep in the North Branch from North Avenue to Addison Street. All depths are referred to normal pool elevation 576.2 feet above mean water level at Father Point, Quebec (International Great Lakes Datum-1955). Portion of project authorized by River and Harbor Act of 1946, is in deferred-for-restudy category. Estimate (1960) for this portion is $65,000. (See table 30-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with for completed modification. Act of July 24, 1946, provided improvement of channel is subject to condition that local interests furnish assurances they will hold the United States free from damages which may result from construction and maintenance of improvement. Requirement has not been complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 23 docks handling lake vessel and river barge cargoes. Most important cargoes handled are sand, gravel, coal, salt, cement, and petroleum products. There are three boatyards, two of which are used for servicing recreational craft and one engaged in constructing and servicing small craft as well as small Navy vessels. U.S. Governement has one dock used by the Corps exclusively. Operations and results during period. Maintenance: Condition surveys were performed by hired labor at a cost of $45,500. Supervision and administration, performed by hired labor, cost $4,500. Under the diked disposal program, engineering and design was continued at a cost of $239,920. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for dredging the channel between North Avenue and Addison Street as authorized by 1946 River and Harbor Act. Heads of navigation for deepdraft vessels are North Avenue on North Branch and Archer Avenue on west fork of South Branch, 5.97 and 5.52 miles, respectively, from Michigan Avenue Bridge. Head of navigation for, barge traffic is near Touhy Avenue on North Shore Channel, about 11 miles from Michigan Avenue Bridge. Total costs of existing project to September 30, 1981 were $4,600,891, of which $544,679 was for new work and $4,056,212 for maintenance. 5. INDIANA HARBOR, IND. Location. Northwestern Indiana (Lake County), on southwest shore of Lake Michiga, 18 miles southeast of Chicago Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14929.) Previous projects. For details see page 1943 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1520 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Provides for a northerly rubblemound breakwater, 1,120 feet long, an easterly reinforced concrete-caisson breakwater 201 feet long, an extension of this latter breakwater about 2,300 feet to north, and construction and placing of a light-house crib; an outer harbor entrance channel generally 800 feet wide with a depth of 29 feet; dredging an anchorage and maneuver basin in the outer harbor to 28 feet, and canal entrance channel to 27 feet deep; a main canal generally 160 feet wide and 22 feet deep; a turning basin lakeward of Canal Street to 22 feet deep; a turning basin at The Forks to 22 feet deep; the Calumet River Branch generally 160 and 260 feet wide and 22 feet deep; the Lake George Branch generally 160 feet wide and 22 feet deep. Cost of completed new work exclusive of amount expended on previous projects are $4,848,980 Federal, and $782,000 non-Federal, which includes a cash contribution of $12,500. Uncompleted portions of the 1930 R. & H. Act, the 1935 R. & H. Act, and the 1965 R. & H. Act were deauthorized in 1977. (See table 30-B for authorizing legislation). Local cooperation. Act of 1937 provides enlargement of Indiana Harbor Canal shall not be undertaken until local interests furnish a right-of-way 300 feet wide and construct substantial bulkheads along channel on established lines shown on map accompanying Rivers and Harbors Committee Document 13, 75th Congress, 1st session, provided that improvement on one side may proceed in any section on fulfillment of conditions for that side of section, and provided further, that south of turning basin at The Forks (beginning 450 feet south of intersection of present Calumet Branch and mainstem bulkhead lines), widening and deepening by the United States shall be done only as rights-of-way and bulkheads on at least one side of the channel are continuously provided southward from above limit of turning basin at The Forks. To provide for 300-foot channel, a parcel of land (of about 4.6 acres), generally 100 feet wide, lying on east side of Calumet River Branch, commencing at north side of 141st Street and extending northward toward The Forks for about 2,170 feet, has been conveyed to and accepted by the United States. Local interests constructed about 1,350 feet of bulkhead along east side of Calumet River Branch, and reconstructed bulkhead on west side from The Forks to 141st Street. Defense Plant Corp. built a bulkhead along east side of canal between Pennsylvania Railroad Co.'s bridge and Dickey Place Bridge, the United States widened and deepened east side of this portion of widening. Youngstown Sheet and Tube Co. constructed a bulkhead along west side of canal between Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad Co. bridge and the Pennsylvania Railroad Co. bridge, and the United States widened and deepened west side of this portion of widening. All prior requirements fully complied with. 30-4 CHICAGO, ILL., DISTRICT Terminal facilities. Four docks for handling iron ore, limestone and taconite; two docks for handling steel mill products by barge; eight docks for petroleum products; three docks for miscellaneous commodities and two docks used exclusively for winter mooring of vessels in layup. Operations and results during period. Maintenance: Condition surveys conducted in 1980 by Detroit District resulted in a credit in the amount of $13,276. Miscellaneous inspections and reports, and supervision and inspection were performed by hired labor at a cost of $3,677. A claim for structural repairs was resolved at a cost of $378. Under the confined disposal program, site selection studies and engineering and design for a new containment area were continued at a cost of $43,582. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project is complete. North breakwater (rubblemound, 1,120 feet, completed in 1922) is in good condition. East breakwater (concrete caisson, 201 feet, completed in 1926) and northerly extension (rubblemound, 2,234 feet, completed in 1935) are in good condition. Head of navigation for commercial vessels is at the Baltimore & Ohio Terminal Railroad bridge on the Lake George Branch about 3 miles from outer harbor, and at 141st Street highway bridge about 2,200 feet south of The Forks on the Calumet River Branch about 2.5 miles from outer harbor. The total costs of the existing project to September 30, 1981 were $9,942,651, of which $8,312,110 were regular funds, $1,618,041 Public Works funds and $12,500 contributed funds; $4,848,980 being for new work and $5,093,671 for maintenance. 6. MICHIGAN CITY HARBOR, IND. Location. Northwest Indiana (in La Porte County), on southeast shore of Lake Michigan, 38 miles southeast of Chicago Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14905.) For descriptions, see page 1482 of Annual Report for 1932. Previous projects. See page 1407 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. See table 30-C. Costs of completed new work are $1,256,257 Federal, exclusive of amount expended on previous project and $37,800 non-Federal, which includes a cash contribution of $30,800. (See table 30-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Four fish docks, one city dock, and one grain elevator in this harbor. Commodities handled at this harbor are salt and fresh fish. There are three small boatyards, which repair and construct recreational craft only. One public dock is owned by city and has not been used for commercial purposes. Opercitions and results during period. Maintenance: A contract for ground maintenance of the confined disposal area was performed at a cost of $175. Condition surveys and inspections and reports were performed by hired labor at a cost of $13,171. Supervision and inspection of these activities were performed by hired labor at a cost of $1,311. Stone was placed on the detached breakwater and east pier at a cost of $34,999. Contract claims for maintenance dredging were resolved at a cost of $917. Engineering and design for construction of steps from the east pier to the east breakwater at a cost of $18,605. Supervision and inspection of these activities cost $7,099. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project is complete. Concrete superstructure, 1,304 feet, on detached breakwater completed in 1931. Rehabilitation of detached breakwater by conversion to a rubblemound was completed in 1969 and the structure is in excellent condition. Rehabilitation of portions of the entrance piers have also been completed and are in excellent condition. The remainder of the entrance piers, completed in 1930, are in poor condition and are being repaired. Under permit from Secretary of War, the Northern Indiana Public Service Co. removed 615 feet of inner end of west pier and about 719 feet of bulkhead south of pier, and replaced them with a steel sheet pile bulkhead located landward of former dock line. Area channelward of new bulkhead was dredged by permittee to 18 feet. Head of navigation for deepdraft commercial vessels and barges is at Franklin Street Bridge at head of project, 1.45 miles above outer end of west pier. Above this point, depths are sufficient only for small shallow draft launches. Total costs of existing project to September 30, 1981 were $7,516,513, of which $1,287,057 was for new work ($1,256,257 Federal and $30,800 non-Federal funds), $4,610,786 for maintenance, and $1,618,670 for rehabilitation. 7. WAUKEGAN HARBOR, ILL. Location. On west shore of Lake Michigan about 51 miles south of Milwaukee and about 38 miles north of Chicago. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14904.) Previous projects. See page 1392. Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. See table 30-C. For completed modifications see page 1239, Annual Report for 1963. The 1970 modification provides for deepening the existing entrance channel in the outer harbor to 25 feet and extending it to that depth in Lake Michigan, at widths varying from 380 feet to 500 feet; deepening the channel between piers to a depth of 23 feet at a width of 180 feet; and deepening the inner basin to 23 feet and 30-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 extending its limits approximately 275 feet northward. Cost for new work is $604,793 Federal and $88,000 non-Federal, exclusive of amounts expended on previous project. Work authorized by the 1970 modification was placed in the inactive category in December 1972. Costs of $2,000,000 (July 1972) Federal and $1,250,000 (July 1972) non-Federal are excluded from cost for new work (See table 30-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed modifications. Terminal facilities. Four commercial docks receive coal, cement and gypsum. In addition there are three publicly owned docks, one owned by the city and used for fishing, and the other two owned by the Waukegan Port District. There is one boat yard for recreational craft. City dock is considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during period. Maintenance: Condition surveys and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by hired labor at a cost of $8,005. Examination of water quality cost $14,889. Engineering and design was performed by hired labor at a cost of $36,369, with supervision and inspection costing $29,018. Under the diked disposal program, engineering and design were conducted at a cost of $55,850. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project is complete except for the 1970 modification which is inactive. Anchorage area in southwest corner of inner basin (1945 modification) was completed in 1966. North pier, completed in 1904, is in poor condition, allowing sand to pass through into the channel between the piers. South pier, completed in 1903 is in good condition. The outer 600 feet of breakwater, completed in 1904, and the shorearm extension, completed in 1931, are in generally good condition except for outer 100 feet which are in poor condition. Costs to September 30, 1981, for existing project were $604,793 for new work and $3,386,055 for maintenance, a total of $3,990,848. 8. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Small Navigation Projects Not Specifically Authorized by Congress (Sec. 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960, as amended, Public Law 645, 86th Congress). Project and Fiscal Year Costs Location to September 30, 1981 SBH Burns Wtwy, Ind. $49,043 Alteration of Bridges 9. OTHER AUTHORIZED BRIDGE ALTERATION See table 30-D. Beach Erosion Control 10. HOLLYWOOD-ARDMORE BEACH ALONG LAKE MICHIGAN, ILL. Location. On Illinois shore of Lake Michigan in City of Chicago (Cook County), on Chicago Park District land, approximately 7 miles north of Chicago Harbor. Existing project. This project was authorized in fiscal year 1980 by House Resolution 7542. The project provides for a wall, approximately 1,400 feet long, running parallel to the shoreline. The purpose of the wall is to prevent fine beach sand from being blown off the beach and onto adjacent Lake Shore Drive. Local cooperation. Local interests must furnish assurances that they will provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rightsof- way necessary for construction of the project; provide without cost to the United States all necessary utility or other relocations and alterations; hold and save the United States free from damage due to the construction of the project, except for those damages caused by negligence of the United States or its contractors; and maintain and operate all the works after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army. Operations and results during period. New work: Plans and specifications were completed at a cost of $105,646. Construction was begun with expenditure of $23,579. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction is in progress. Total costs of existing project to September 30, 1981 were $132,729, for all new work. 11. MT. BALDY, INDIANA DUNES NATIONAL LAKESHORE, IND. Location. On the south end of Lake Michigan shoreline, approximately two miles west of Michigan City, Indiana. Existing Project. The Corps of Engineers was funded under the Energy and Water Development Appropriation Act 1981, dated 1 October 1980, Public Law 96-367, to provide beach nourishment along approximately 3,000 feet of shore at the toe of Mt. Baldy in the Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore. Local Cooperation. The work is within the National Park Service property and the National Park Service, acting through its Superintendent of the Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore, issued to the Corps of Engineers on 28 April 1981 a right-ofway permit to do the work. Access to the project was made possible through the cooperation of the Northern Indiana Public Service Company. On 28 August 1973, the State of Indiana granted a 10- 30-6 CHICAGO, ILL., DISTRICT year license to the National Park Service for the installation and maintenance of beach nourishment material and stone revetment in this area, which was still valid for this project. Operations and results during period. New Work: Surveying, mapping, and design of work were initiated and completed, resulting in plans and specifications at a cost of $130,883. Environmental Assessment and Real Estate were done at a cost of $10,589. Construction was started at a cost of $80,000. Supervision and inspection was performed at a cost of $5,833. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is under construction. Total costs of existing project to September 30, 1981 were $227,305. 12. OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS See table 30-E. 13. BEACH EROSION CONTROL UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Beach erosion control activities pursuant to section 103 of the River and Harbor Act of 1962, as amended. Project and Fiscal Year Costs Location to September 30, 1981 Chicago Beaches, Ill. $3,368 Flood Control 14. CHICAGO RIVER, ILL. (NORTH BRANCH) Location. North Branch, Chicago River is located in Cook and Lake Counties in northeastern part of Illinois. Existing project. Provides for clearing the channel of the North Branch of the Chicago River, Illinois of fallen trees, roots, and other debris and objects which contribute to flooding, unsightliness and pollution of the river. The project was authorized by the River and Harbor Act of December 31, 1970 (Sec. 116) and amended by River & Harbor Act of 1974 providing for maintenance of the project. Local cooperation. The 1970 Act provides that local interests furnish without cost to the United States all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and spoil-disposal areas necessary for construction of the project; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works; maintain and operate all the works after completion without cost to the United States; and, agree to bear all costs in excess of $200,000 for completing the work. Assurance of local cooperation for the 1970 modification was approved on 31 July 1972. The 1974 Act amends the 1970 Act so that the United States will maintain the channel free of trees, roots, debris and objects at a cost not to exceed $150,000 per year with non-Federal interests paying 25 per centum of the cost of maintenance. Operations and results during period. Maintenance: Engineering and design costs were $29,594. Federal funds in the amount of $150,545 were expended on two contracts for snagging and clearing of the North Branch from the North Shore Channel in Chicago to 1,400 feet upstream of Voltz Road in Northbrook. The local sponsor, the Metropolitan Sanitary District of Greater Chicago, contributed $50,842 for the work. Supervision and inspection costs associated with the contract were $15,049. Condition at end of fiscal year. The initial project was completed 26 May 1973. Total costs of existing project to September 30, 1981 were $1,009,515, of which $231,884 was for new work ($191,884 regular funds and $40,000 contributed funds), and $777,631 for maintenance, ($606,182 Federal funds and $171,449 contributed funds). 15. LITTLE CALUMET RIVER, ILL. Location. Rises in western LaPorte County, Indiana, near Michigan City and flows generally westerly through Porter and Lake County, Indiana, into Cook County, Illinois, to its junction with the Calumet-Sag Channel in Calumet Park, Illinois. Approximately 12 miles of the Little Calumet River lies within the State of Illinois. Existing project. Provides for clearing the channel of the Little Calument River, Illinois, from its confluence with the Calumet-Sag Channel eastward to the Indiana State Line, of fallen trees, roots, silt, and other debris and objects which contribute to flooding, unsightliness and pollution of the river. Project was authorized by Water Resources Development Act of 1974, Section 66, approved 7 March 1974. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during period. New work: Planning and engineering studies were performed on the Phase II silt removal portion of the project with costs of $112,909. Condition at end of fiscal year. Total cost of existing project to September 30, 1981 was $441,731, all new work. 16. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See table 30-F. 30-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 17. FLOOD CONTROL UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Cong. and antecedent legislation). Fiscal year costs Project and Location ..... to September 30, 1981 Disaster Preparedness $ 86,131 Repair and Restoration 398,571 General Investigations 18. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs were $3,675,145 itemized as follows: Navigation Studies Flood Damage Prevention Studies Shoreline Protection Studies Special Studies Coordination Studies Supplemental Pre-authorization $ 61,532 385,443 152,512 269,586 127,335 2,679,737 19. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Fiscal year costs of $555,607 were for: National Dam Safety Program Flood Plain Management Services $419,745 135,862 20. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT Cost for hydrologic studies during the fiscal year was $3,053. 30-8 CHICAGO, ILL., DISTRICT TABLE 30-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to in Text Project Funding FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 September 30, 1981 1. Burns Waterway Harbor, Ind. [Federal Funds] [Contributed Funds] 2. Calumet Harbor and River Ill. and Ind. [Federal Funds] [Contributed Funds] 3. Chicago Harbor, Ill. 4. Chicago River, Ill. 5. Indiana Harbor, Ind. 6. Michigan City Harbor, Ind. [Contributed Funds] New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost Rehab.: Approp. Cost Maint.: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost Rehab.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost Rehab.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost 405,000 405,674 - - 40,000 1,010,000 40,003 1,001,531 460,000 98,000 540,000 463,083 99,989 528,586 185,000 185,003 23,072 21,152 - - 107,000 258,000 107,009 256,707 9,000 145,000 10,920 144,998 117,000 88,000 257,000 117,000 87,998 251,157 930,000 830,005 469,000 118,000 565,003 120,994 455,000 463,466 320,000 315,735 260,000 261,291 290,000 289,920 30,000 34,361J 83,000 76,277 30-9 13,584,000 13,584,000 3,453,793 3,453,790 15,990 15,990 22,578,5671 22,578,5671 13,612,774' 13,597,095' 689,001' 689,001' 836,667 836,667 4,788,827' 4,788,827' 4,953,786 4,953,784 1,326,600 1,326,600 1,500,565' 1,500,5655 4,165,757' 4,165,675' 4,897,148' ' 4,897,148' ' 5,097,665' 5,096,181' 1,543,646" 1,543,646" 4,618,512 4,610,786 1,618,670 1,618,670 30,800 30,800 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 30-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to in Text Project Funding FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 September 30, 1981 7. Waukegan New Work: Harbor, Ill. Approp. - - - - 823,026" Cost - - - - 823,02611 Maint.: Approp. 55,000 320,000 27,000 200,000 3,459,309" Cost 55,005 320,001 25,326 144,131 3,401,766" 10. Hollywood-Ardmore New Work: Beach, Ill. Approp. - - 30,000 340,000 370,000 Cost - - 3,504 129,225 132,729 11. Mount Baldy, Ind. New Work: Dunes National Approp. - - - 1,500,000 1,500,000 Lakeshore, Ind. Cost - - - 227,305 227,305 14. Chicago River, Ill. New Work: North Branch Approp. - - - - 191,884 [Federal Funds] Cost - - - - 191,884 Maint.: Approp. 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 697,000 Cost 149,921 150,087 13,995 195,188 606,182 [Contributed New Work: Funds] Contrib. - - - - 40,000 Cost - - - - 40,000 Maint.: Contrib. 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 240,000 Cost 57,982 52,904 9,721 50,842 171,449 15. Little Calumet New Work: River, Ill. Approp. - - 50,000 100,000 458,000 Cost - - 20,822 112,909 441,731 1. Includes $855,973 for previous projects. 2. Excludes contributed funds in settlement pursuant to decree [No. 54-C-1608] regarding removal of flue-dust and includes $45,230 for previous projects. 3. In settlement pursuant to decree [No. 54-C-1608] regarding removal of flue-dust. 4. Includes $446,005 for previous projects. 5. Includes $955,886 for previous projects. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Includes $109,463 for previous projects. Includes $60,668 for previous projects. Includes $2,509 for previous projects. Excludes $12,500 contributed funds. Includes $287,389 for previous projects. Includes $218,233 on previous projects. Includes $15,711 on previous projects. 30-10 CHICAGO, ILL., DISTRICT TABLE 30-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 3, 1899 June 13, 1902 Mar. 3, 1905 June 25, 1910 Sept. 22, 1922 Aug. 30, 1935' a Aug. 30, 1935' s Mar. 2, 1945' July 14, 1960 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 27, 1965 July 11, 1870 June 14, 1880 Mar. 3, 1899 July 25, 1912 Mar. 2, 1919 Mar. 3, 1931 Mar. 2, 1945 Oct. 23, 1962 Mar. 3, 1899 June 13, 1902 Mar. 2, 1907 CALUMET HARBOR AND RIVER, ILL. AND IND. (See Section 2 of Text) Outer harbor protected by breakwaters. Five turning basins Provided for shape and dimensions of turning basins Consolidated the 2 projects for Calumet Harbor and Calumet River. Detached breakwater, dredging outer harbor to existing project depth and dimensions; deepen river-entrance channel and river to existing project depths; widen and straighten river channel; 5 turning basins to same depth as adjacent channel. Dredging areas A and B in south end of Lake Calumet and an entrance channel 300 feet wide to 21 feet deep. An approach channel to harbor 3,200 feet wide and 28 feet deep through shoals outside breakwater and closing existing gap between breakwaters. Depth of 29 feet in lake approach to 28 feet in outer harbor; and 27 feet in river entrance up to E.J.&E. Ry. Bridge. Deepen, widen, and straighten channel in Calumet River from E.J.&E. Ry. Bridge to and including turning basin 5, to a depth of 27 feet in earth and 28 feet in rock; deepen turning basins 1, 3 and 5 to 27 feet; enlarge turning basins 3 and 5; a channel into Lake Calumet to 27 feet deep for 3,000 feet and a width of 1,000 feet; and eliminate turning basins 2 and 4 from project. Modification of Act of Oct. 23, 1962. Protection for Elgin, Joliet and Eastern Railway Bridge over the Calumet River, to permit dredging to full width of the south draw to depth of 27 feet, and temporary protection for the center pier and south abutment of the New York, Chicago and St. Louis Railroad Bridge [Nickel Plate] to permit dredging of full width of south bridge draw to depth of 27 feet prior to its replacement. CHICAGO HARBOR, ILL. (See Section 3 of Text) Inner breakwaters and inner basin. Exterior Breakwater. Present project depth in basin, and entrance to Chicago River. Shore-arm and southerly extnesion of exterior breakwater. Modification of area to be dredged in inner basin. Shore-arm extension of exterior breakwater transferred to Lincoln Park Commissioners. Resumption of jurisdiction over shore-arm extension breakwater and over certain navigable waters in Lake Michigan which lie in northwestern part of outer harbor. Deepen a lake approach channel to 29 by 800 feet wide for 6,600 feet; and deepen a channel and maneuver area inside harbor entrance to 28 by 1,300 feet wide. CHICAGO RIVER, ILL. (See Section 4 of Text) For project depth of 21 feet in lieu of that fixed by act of June 3, 1896. Turning basins. Interpreted by Chief of Engineers, April 11, 1908 as adopting new work of the then existing project for 21-foot depth. 30-11 Annual Report, 1896 pp. 2584 et seq., and H. Doc. 277, H. 54th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 172, 58th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 349, 60th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 494, 72d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 180, 73d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 233, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 149, 86th Cong., 1st sess.' H. Doc. 581, 87th Cong., 2d sess." H. Report No. 973, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. Ex. Doc. 114, 41st Cong., 2d sess., and Annual Report 1879, pp. 1562-1567 Annual Report 1870, pp. 1562- 1567 Annual Report 1897, pp. 2790- 2791 H. Doc. 710, 62d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 1303, 64th Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 797, 71st Cong. Public Law 14, 79th Cong. H. Doc. 485, 87th Cong., 2d sess.' Specified in act. Specified in act. H. Doc. 95, 56th Cong., 1st sess [Annual Report, 1900, p. 3863, and Annual Report, 1909, p. 7091. REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 30-B (Continu Acts Mar. 2, 1919 July 24, 1946 June 25, 1910 Mar. 4, 1913 Mar. 2, 1919 Mar. 20, 1922 Mar. 3, 1925 Mar. 2, 1929 July 3, 19301* June 30, 1932 Aug. 30, 193511 Aug. 26, 1937 July 14, 1960 Oct. 27, 1965" Mar. 3, 1889 Mar. 3, 1905 Jan. 21, 1927 Aug. 30, 1935 Sept. 30, 1966 Sec. 107 July 14, 1960 ied) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized Eliminated all work except maintenance of main river. Dredging channel 9 feet deep to within 30 feet of existing bulkheads and river banks from North Ave. to Belmont Ave., thence 9 feet deep and 50 feet wide to Addison St. INDIANA HARBOR, IND. (See Section 5 of Text) Maintenance of outer harbor. Maintenance of inner harbor channel when deeded free of cost to and accepted by the United States. Breakwaters. Lighthouse crib, present length and aline easterly and northerly breakwaters. Reduce length of channel to be maintained in extension to Lake George. Authorized Secretary of War to modify project so far as relates to length and alinement of breakwaters and to sell Youngstown Sheet and Tube Co. about 1,180 linear feet of shoreward end of existing north breakwater. Accept 2.3 acres of land for construction of the Forks Turning Basin. Existing project channel width and depth in Lake George Branch and turning basin at the Forks. Authorized Secretary of War to sell Inland Steel Co. about 1,903 linear feet of southerly end of existing east breakwater. Extended easterly breakwater, dredge entrance channel and outer harbor, deepen channel between bulkhead fills, widen main stem of canal and portion of Calumet River Branch to 141st St. Modified conditions of local cooperation required before enlargement of Indiana Harbor Canal is undertaken by United States. Increase authorized depths to 29 feet in outer harbor entrance channel; 28 feet in outer harbor, and 27 feet in canal entrance channel to first E.J.&E. Ry. Bridge. Deepen main canal from landward end of canal entrance channel to a point lakeward of Dickey Place Bridge over a modified channel width of 190 feet, except through bridge openings. MICHIGAN CITY HARBOR, IND (See Section 6 of Text) East breakwater and old east pier inclosing the outer basin. Extension of east pier. Extend east pier and construct detached breakwater. Lower turning basin. Rebuild west pier as at present located. Present project dimensions of entrance channel. Existing project depth in channel, and in lower and middle turning basins, eliminated improvement of Trail Creek above middle turning basin and uncompleted portion of detached breakwater, abandonment of old east breakwater and old east pier inclosing outer basin. Restore and repair westerly 1,000 feet of east breakwater, dredging outer basin, and enlarging entrance to basin through east pier. Dredge river channel 50 feet wide and 6 feet deep from upper turning basin to E Street bridge. Documents H. Doc. 1294, 64th Cong., 1st ses8. H. Doc. 767, 78th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 1113, 60th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 690, 62d Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 6, 65th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 176, 67th Cong. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 21, 71st Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 219, 72d Cong. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 29, 72d Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 13, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 195, 86th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 227, 89th Cong., 1st sess.* Recommendation of a Board of Engineers, Annual Report, 1870, p. 123. Reports of Boards of Engineers, Annual Report, 1851, pp. 2187-2189; Annual Report 1882, pp. 2264-2266. Annual Report, 1897, pp. 2903-2904. Joint resolution of Congress approved May 13, 1908, Public Law 23. H. Doc. 279, 69th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 34, 74th Cong., 1st sess. Detailed Project Report June 1965. 30-12 CHICAGO, ILL., DISTRICT TABLE 30-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents WAUKEGAN HARBOR, ILL. (See Section 7 of Text) June 14, 1880 Parallel piers and basins.' Annual Report, 1880, p. 1942. Aug. 3, 1882 Modified location of harbor entrance. Annual Report, 1882, pp. 277, 2162. June 13, 1902 Detached breakwater, extend piers, increase width of harbor at H. Doc. 343, 56th Cong., 1st inner end of north pier, and dredge channel and basin to depth sess. of 20 feet. July 3, 1930 Extension of breakwater to shore, dredging near outer end of Rivers and Harbors north pier, and enlarging inner basin. Committee Doc. 27, 71st Cong., 2d sess. Mar. 2, 1945 Dredge an entrance channel to existing project dimensions from H. Doc. 116, 77th Cong., 1st outer end of north pier to project depth in lake, and dredge an sess. anchorage area in southwest corner of inner basin to existing project depth. Abandonment of dredging triangular area in southwest corner of inner basin to 18 feet deep. Dec. 17, 1970 Provides for deepening the existing entrance channel in the H. Doc. 368, 90th Cong., 2d Sec. 201 outer harbor to 25 feet and extending it to that depth in Lake sess.' Oct. 27, 1965 Michigan, at widths varying from 380 feet to 500 feet; deepening the channel between piers to a depth of 23 feet at a width of 180 feet, and deepening the inner basin to 23 feet and extending its limits approximately 275 feet northward. HOLLYWOOD-ARDMORE BEACH ALONG LAKE MICHIGAN, ILL. (See Section 10 of Text) July 8, 1980 Provides for a reinforced concrete wall, together with grading Public Law 96-304 and fill in order to stabilize the beach. "Supplemental Appropriations and Rescission Act, 1980." MOUNT BALDY, INDIANA DUNES NATIONAL LAKESHORE, IND. (See Section 11 of Text) Oct. 1, 1980 Provides for emergency beach nourishment. Public Law 96-367. 1. Included in Public Works Administration Program 8. Contains latest published map. Sept. 6, 1943, and Dec. 16, 1933. 9. Completed under previous project. 2. Uncompleted portion was deauthorized in 1977 10. Uncompleted portion was deauthorized in 1977 [widen [dredging in front of U.S. Steel Corp.] and deepen Lake George Branch.] 3. Uncompleted portion was deauthorized in 1977 11. Included in Public Works Administration Program [breakwater closure.] Sept. 6, 1933, and July 25, 1934. Uncompleted portion was 4. Contains latest map of harbor. deauthorized in 1977 [widen and deepen main canal and 5. Contains latest map of river. Calumet River Branch.] 6. Latest published map is in Annual Report for 1914, 12. Project deauthorized in 1977. opposite p. 2928. 7. Contains latest published map of North Branch above North Ave. 30-13 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 30-C EXISTING PROJECTS See Section in Text Project Item Length (feet) Width (feet) Depth (feet) 2. Calumet Harbor and River, Ill. and Ind. 3. Chicago Harbor, Ill. 6. Michigan City Harbor, Ind. 7. Waukegan Harbor, Ill. Northerly breakwater Southerly breakwater North pier Approach channel Outer harbor River entrance Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Bridge to turning basin No. 3 Turning basin No. 3 to turning basin No. 5 Approach into Lake Calumet Extension into Lake Calumet Turning basins 1, 3 and 5 Shore arm north breakwater Exterior breakwater Southerly extension North inner breakwater South inner breakwater North pier Approach channel Channel and maneuver area Entrance channel Inner basin Detached breakwater West pier East pier East breakwater Entrance channel Main channel Outer basin Trail Creek Trail Creek North breakwater and Shore Connection North pier South pier Entrance channel Channel to inner basin Inner basin Anchorage Area 6,714 5,007 2,450 9,700 10,500 3,000 21,100 8,000 4,000 3,000 2,250 5,421 4,944 3,034 2,544 960 6,600 2,200 7,300 1,270 1,304 835 2,276 1,000 1,900 2,400 900 3,000 2,300 1,894 1,442 3,111 3,250 1,700 1,650 'Area of about 6 acres. 30-14 3,200 3,000 290 200 and variable Variable 400 1,000 800 1,300 190-470 740 150-425 120-150 900 50-100 50 380-500 180 375-500 - - 29 28 27 27 earth 28 rock 27 27 27 27 29 28 21 21 18 18 8-12 8 6 22 18 18 8 CHICAGO, ILL., DISTRICT TABLE 30-D OTHER AUTHORIZED BRIDGE ALTERATION (See Section 9 of Text) For Last Cost to September 30, 1981 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Calumet River Bridges' 1967 $1,625,068 'Transferred to Department of Transportation in accordance with Section 6[g] of the Act of October 15, 1966, P.L. 89-670. TABLE 30-E OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION PROJECTS (See Section 12 of Text) For Last Cost to September 30, 1981 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Evanston, Illinois 1979 $766,052 - Lake Michigan-Lake Bluff, Ill. 1976 244,889 - Lake Michigan-Lake Forest, Ill.' 1975 65,611 - 'Authorized by River and Harbor Act of 1954. OTHER AUTHORIZED TABLE 30-F FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 16 of Text) For Last Cost to September 30, 1981 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance KANKAKEE RIVER, ILL. AND IND. Levee between Shelby Bridge and Baum's Bridge in Ind. 1938 LITTLE CALUMET RIVER, ILL. AND IND. Little Calumet River and Tributaries, Ill. and Ind.' 1968 53,136 'Classified inactive in November 1971. 30-15 DETROIT, MICH., DISTRICT* The district is composed of the upper and lower peninsulas of Michigan and portions of Indiana, Wisconsin and Minnesota which border the lakes. It includes U. S. waters of Lakes Superior, Michigan, Huron, St. Clair and western Lake Erie. Unless otherwise indicated all depths stated in this report are referred to low water datum as follows: Lake Superior, 600 feet; Lake Michigan-Huron, 576.8 feet; Lake Erie, 568.6 feet; and Lake St. Clair, 571.7 feet. Elevations in feet are above mean water level at Father Point, Quebec (International Great Lakes Datum-1955). IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Algoma Harbor, Wisc.......................... 31-2 2. Arcadia Harbor, Mich. ........................ 31-3 3. Ashland Harbor Wis ............................ 31-3 4. Beaver Bay Harbor, Mich. .................... 31-3 5. Big Bay Harbor, Mich. .......................... 31-4 6. Black River, (Port Huron) Mich. ............... 31-4 7. Bolles Harbor, Mich. .......................... 31-5 8. Caseville Harbor, Mich ....................... 31-5 9. Cedar River Harbor, Mich. ................. 31-5 10. Charlevoix Harbor, Mich. .................... 31-6 11. Cheboygan Harbor, Mich. ...................... 31-7 12. Clinton River, Mich ............................. 31-7 13. Cornucopia Harbor, Wis. ................... 31-8 14. Cross Village Harbor, Mich ..................... 31-8 15. Detour Harbor, Mich. ........................... 31-9 16. Detroit River, Mich .......................... 31-10 17. Duluth-Superior Harbor, Minn. and Wis............................... 31-10 18. Fox River, Wis .............................. 31-11 19. Frankfort Harbor, Mich. ................. 31-12 20. Grand Haven Harbor and Grand River, Mich ............................ 31-13 21. Grand Marais Harbor, Minn................. 31-13 22. Grand Traverse Bay Harbor, Mich ..................................... 31-13 23. Green Bay Harbor, Wis. ....................... 31-14 24. Hammond Bay Harbor, Mich ................. 31-14 25. Harbor Beach Harbor, Mich. ................... 31-15 Navigation (cont.) 26. Harrisville Harbor, Mich. ...................... 27. Holland Harbor, Mich. ......................... 28. The Inland Route, Mich........................ 29. Kenosha Harbor, Wis. .......................... 30. Kewaunee Harbor, Wis. ....................... 31. Keweenaw Waterway, Mich..................... 32. Knife River Harbor, Minn. ...................... 33. La Pointe Harbor, Wis ......................... 34. Lake St. Clair, Mich. Channels ............... ................... 35. Leland Harbor, Mich. .......................... 36. Lexington Harbor, Mich. ....................... 37. Little Lake Harbor, Mich. ..................... 38. Ludington Harbor, Mich........................ 39. Lutsen Harbor, Minn. ....................... 40. Manistee Harbor, Mich. ..................... 41. Manistique Harbor, Mich. .... ............. 42. Manitowoc Harbor, Wis........................ 43. Menominee Harbor and River, Mich. and W is ............... ................. 44. Milwaukee Harbor, Wis....................... 45. Monroe Harbor, Mich ..................... 46. Muskegon Harbor, Mich. ....................... 47. New Buffalo Harbor, Mich.................... 48. Ontonagon Harbor, Mich ....................... 49. Pentwater Harbor, Mich..................... 50. Point Lookout Harbor, Mich................. 51. Portage Lake Harbor, Mich.................... * All cost and Financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 31-1 Page 31-15 31-15 31-16 31-17 31-17 31-18 31-18 31-19 31-19 31-19 31-20 31-20 31-21 31-21 31-21 31-22 31-22 31-23 31-24 31-24 31-25 31-25 31-26 31-26 31-27 31-27 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 52. 53. 54. 55. 56. 57. 58. 59. 60. 61. 62. 63. 64. 65. 66. 67. 68. 69. 70. Navigation (cont.) Port Sanilac Harbor, Mich ................... Port Washington Harbor, Wis ................ Presque Isle Harbor, Mich...................... Racine Harbor, Wis..... ................. Rouge River, Mich........................... Saginaw River, Mich. .... ..................... St. Clair River, Mich.... .................. St. Joseph Harbor, Mich. ........ .......... St. Marys River, Mich ........................ Saugatuck Harbor and Kalamazoo River, Mich............... ............. Saxon Harbor, Wis ............................ Sebewaing River, Mich .................... Sheboygan Harbor, Wis...................... South Haven Harbor, Mich................... Sturgeon Bay and Lake Michigan Ship Canal, Wis. ........ .............. Two Harbors, Minn.......................... Two Rivers Harbor, Wis........................ Whitefish Point Harbor, Mich................... Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys ....................................... 31-37 71. Other authorized navigation projects ....................................... 31-37 72. Navigation work under special authorization ................................ 31-37 Page Navigation (cont.) Page 31-28 31-28 31-28 31-29 31-29 31-30 31-31 31-31 31-32 31-33 31-33 31-33 31-34 31-34 31-35 31-35 31-36 31-36 Navigation 1. ALGOMA HARBOR, WIS. Location. On west shore of Lake Michigan, about 68 miles from Green Bay via Sturgeon Bay Canal and about 115 miles northerly from Milwaukee (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 14910). Previous project. For details see page 1199 of Annual Report for 1958. Existing project. Provides for (a) a north pier 1102 feet long; (b) a south breakwater 1530 feet long; (c) an entrance channel 14 feet deep and 200 feet wide from that depth in Lake Michigan and extending 800 feet landward; (d) a channel 14 feet deep in the Ahnapee River 80 to 175 feet wide for 1200 feet up to the Second Street Bridge; (e) an outer basin 14 feet, 600 feet long and 100 to 500 feet wide. For a more detailed description see page 1200 of Annual Report for 1958. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Consists of several fishing wharves. This harbor has one of the largest charter fishing fleets on the Great Lakes. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and environmental studies were performed at a cost of $4,875. Riprap of navigation structures were performed at a cost of $77,512. Engineering, surveys, supervision and administration cost $2,713. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was completed in 1909. Ahnapee River is navigable for about two miles from the mouth at a depth of four feet. Total cost of existing project to 30 September 1981 was $979,197 of which $99,236 was for new work and $879,961 for maintenance. 31-2 73. Authorized beach erosion control projects ................................ 31-37 74. Emergency shore protection ................... 31-37 75. Beach erosion work under special authorization ................................ 31-37 76. Mitigation of shore damages ................... 31-37 Flood Control 77. Red Run Drain-Lower Clinton River, Mich. ................................ 31-37 78. River Rouge, Mich............................ 31-38 79. Saginaw River, Mich. .......................... 31-39 80. Sebewaing, Sebewaing, River, M ich .......... .................. ............. 31-40 81. Inspection of completed flood control projects .............................. 31-40 82. Other authorized flood control projects ..................................... 31-40 83. Flood control under special authorization .................................. 31-40 84. Surveillance of Northern Boundary Waters ...................................... 31-42 General Investigations 85. Surveys ...................................... 31-43 86. Collection and study of basic data .............. ..................... 31-43 DETROIT, MICH., DISTRICT 2. ARCADIA HARBOR, MICH. Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 193 miles northeasterly from Chicago and 15 miles northerly from Manistee, Michigan. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14907.) Existing project. Provided for maintenance dredging of the existing harbor built by private interests for a period of five years. The five years covered by this project were the calendar years 1905 to 1909, inclusive. Funds were also appropriated and maintenance was performed in calendar years 1911, 1912, 1913 and 1915. There is at present no approved project for the improvement of this harbor. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Dock facilities are considered adequate for existing recreational traffic. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies and miscellaneous inspections were performed at a cost of $6,485. A contract was awarded and completed for maintenance dredging at a cost of $44,500. Approximately 11,853 cubic yards, place measure, of shoal material was removed by hydraulic dredge. The reconnaissance report for major rehabilitation of navigation structures was completed at a cost of $10,767. Engineering, surveys, supervision and administration cost $4,240. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was completed in 1909. Varying depths of 5-12 feet exist in the channel at present. Future maintenance of the harbor will be based on providing a 9 foot depth. Piers and revetments are in fair condition with some sections in need of major repair. Total cost at end of fiscal year for existing project was $575,040. 3. ASHLAND HARBOR, WIS. Location. At head of Chequamegon Bay, on south shore of Lake Superior, about 65 miles east of Duluth, Minn. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14974.) Existing project. A west channel 20 and 21 feet deep and an east basin 25 and 27 feet deep, both all protected by an 8,000-foot breakwater. For additional details see page 1008 of Annual Report for 1965. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. City of Ashland owns 4,150 feet of waterfront for future public needs. Wharves for handling coal, ore, limestone, logs, and pulpwood are served by railroads. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Handling of ore and logs has been discontinued for the present. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and services were performed by government forces at a cost of $5,941. A contract was awarded for maintenance dredging. The contract is approximately 95 percent complete. An estimated 38,000 cubic yards, place measure, of shoal material was removed by hydraulic dredge at a cost of $363,850. Engineering, surveys, supervision and administration costs $59,058. Condition at end of fiscal year. Work authorized prior to 1960 act was completed in 1950. Work authorized by 1960 act was completed in November 1962. Breakwater is in generally good condition, except for settled portions. Total cost of existing project to end of fiscal year is $3,677,817 of which $1,748,172 was for new work and $1,929,645 for maintenance. 4. BEAVER BAY HARBOR, MINN. Location. The harbor is located on the north shore of Lake Superior 53 miles northeasterly from Duluth, Minn., and 56 miles southwesterly from Grand Marias, Minn. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14966.) Existing project. Project as modified provides for a combination primarily of rubblemound breakwaters with a steel sheet piling cell at each side of the harbor entry totaling 540 feet in length, and an excavated harbor basin approximately 2 acres in size, and 8 feet deep. See page 1659 of Annual Report for 1945 for improvements authorized by the River and Harbor Act approved March 2, 1945 (H. Doc. No 446, 78th Cong., 2d sess.). This document contains the latest published map. Estimated Federal cost (1981) for new work is $2,730,000 and non-Federal cost is $198,000. Local cooperation. See page 1659 and 1660 of Annual Report for 1945. Final assurances executed in June 1981. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Preconstruction planning was continued at a cost of $69,795. 31-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 Condition at the end of the year. Preconstruction planning is near completion with the Phase II General Design Memorandum being completed and work on the construction plans and specifications underway. 5. BIG BAY HARBOR, MICH. Location. On south shore of Lake Superior 33 miles northwesterly from Marquette, Mich., and 38 miles easterly from Portage entry to Keweenaw Waterway. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14964.) Existing project. Provides for two converging piers extending from shore, an entrance channel between piers and rectangular harbor basin. Project depths are 12 feet in entrance channel and 10 feet in harbor basin. For details see page 1009 of Annual Report for 1965 and page 1261 of Annual Report for 1962. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. A State-owned launching ramp and dock for small craft. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed at a cost of $874. A contract in the amount of $37,380 was awarded for maintenance dredging. The contract is in the process of being cancelled with only $4,800 being spent this fiscal year. Engineering, design, layouts, supervision and administration cost $5,550. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was completed in June 1961 except for protection at inner end of east breakwater, completed in November 1961. A contract for repair of breakwater, damaged by storms was completed in August 1969. A reconnaissance report was completed in July 1971 concerning erosion of the beach adjacent to the harbor. Total cost to end of fiscal year was $1,285,217 of which $375,412 was for new work and $909,805 for maintenance. 6. BLACK RIVER (PORT HURON), MICH. Location. This river has its source in the northern part of Sanilac County, Mich., is about 60 miles long, and flows in a southeasterly direction into the St. Clair River. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14852.) Previous project. For details see page 1441 of Annual Report for 1916, and 1554 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. This provides for a channel 20 feet deep from deep water in St. Clair River to the Grand Trunk Western Railroad Bridge, 160 feet wide at the mouth, decreasing to 100 feet about 800 feet from the mouth, thence 100 feet wide for 2,600 feet, decreasing to 75 feet for a distance of 4,800 feet, widening two bends to 100 feet, one at the foot of 12th Street, and the other below the Grand Trunk Western Railroad Bridge; for a settling basin 75 feet wide and 20 feet deep, beginning at the Grand Trunk Western Railroad Bridge in Port Huron and extending upstream a distance of about 2,300 feet; and then for a distance of 2.6 miles as a 100-foot wide river channel, 8 feet deep to the I-94 bridge where it decreases to 6 feet deep and continues to the vicinity of the Black River Drainage Canal with suitable widening where required at bends in the channel. The project modification authorized by the Act of August 30, 1935 is considered to be inactive and is excluded from the foregoing cost for new work. The cost of this modification was last revised in 1954 and was estimated to be $194,000 exclusive of $194,000 to be contributed by local interests. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are docks on both sides of Black River, near its mouth, and between these docks and the upper limit of improvement there are 5 other docks varying in length from 100 to 500 feet. All docks are privately owned and are restricted to the use of the owners. The facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Public recreational boating facilities constructed by the State and local agencies are available as are privately owned and operated marinas. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $6,986. Engineering and design for maintenance dredging for work to be performed next fiscal year cost $6,205. Condition at end of fiscal year. All work, except that authorized by Act of August 30, 1935 and the latest modification has been completed. Total costs for existing project to end of fiscal year were $1,322,307 of which $830,165 (includes $349,921 contributed funds) was for new work and $492,142 for maintenance. 31-4 DETROIT, MICH., DISTRICT 7. BOLLES HARBOR, MICH. Location. On west shore of Lake Erie at mouth of La Plaisance Creek, 7 miles southwest of Monroe, Mich. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14846.) Existing project. Provides for an entrance channel in Lake Erie, 8 feet deep and 80 feet wide from deep water to a point opposite the outer end of existing jetty, thence widening to 100 feet at creek mouth; an accesss channel in La Plaisance Creek, 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide at the mouth widening to 120 feet and extending to the first bend, thence narrowing to 50 feet wide and continuing at that width to the La Plaisance Road bridge; a steel sheet pile revetment, about 200 feet long, located along Michigan State Conservation Department property on west side of channel at creek mouth. Project also provides for inclusion of existing 400-foot long steel sheet pile jetty constructed by Michigan State Waterways Commission at the mouth of La Plaisance Creek. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Location cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. The Monroe Boat Club and three marinas provide facilities adequate for existing recreational boat traffic. There is also a public launching ramp and parking area at Conservation Department fishing site at creek mouth. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, miscellaneous inspections and services were performed at a cost of $7,800. Maintenance of disposal area was performed at a cost of $8,198. A contract was awarded and completed for maintenance dredging at a cost of $7,800. Maintenance of disposal area was performed at a cost of $8,198. A contract was awarded and completed for maintenance dredging at a cost of $94,715. Approximately 8,264 cubic yards, place measure, of shoal material was removed by hydraulic dredge. Engineering, surveys, supervision and administration cost $14,455. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was completed in 1970. (Adequate depths exist over the project length except for upstream 800 feet). Total costs to end of fiscal year were $2,468,621 of which $426,413 was for new work $255,000 contributed funds) and $2,042,208 for maintenance. 8. CASEVILLE HARBOR, MICH. Location. At mouth of Pigeon River on south shore of Saginaw Bay about 17 miles southwest of Port Austin, Mich. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14860.) Existing project. A small craft harbor of refuge consisting of a breakwater protected channel extending from the 10-foot contour in Saginaw Bay into Pigeon River. Project depths are 10 and 8 feet. For additional details see page 1320 of Annual Report for 1963. Widening river channel from 50 to 60 feet for about 1,000 feet, with widening to 80 feet in upper 300-foot reach, is considered inactive. Estimated (1963) cost of this portion of project is $30,000. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Complete public boating facilities constructed by State and local agencies are available in addition to privately owned and operated marinas. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and services were performed at a cost of $2,840. The contract for maintenance dredging awarded last fiscal year was completed at a cost of $138,100. Approximately 23,350 cubic yards, scow measure, of shoal material was removed. Engineering, supervision and administration cost $7,861. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was completed in 1964 except for the inactive portion of the project. Total costs to end of fiscal year were $1,404,184 of which $587,314 was for new work (including $293,657 contributed funds) and $816,870 for maintenance. 9. CEDAR RIVER HARBOR, MICH. Location. At mouth of Cedar River on west shore of Green Bay an arm of Northern Lake Michigan about 68 miles north of City of Green Bay. Nearest harbors are Menominee, Mich., 27 miles southwest and at Escanaba, Mich., 20 miles northeast. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14909.) Existing project. Two parallel entrance piers, a west pier 301 feet long and a rubblemound cast 2,100 feet long with a cellular sheet pile pierhead and sport fishing walkway; an entrance channel 100 feet wide and 10 feet deep from that depth in Green Bay to mouth of Cedar River about 2,100 feet long; and inner channel in Cedar River 1,400 feet long, 80 feet wide, and 8 feet deep upstream to about 150 below State Route 35 bridge; and a turning basin 150 feet wide near upstream end of inner bridge channel. Estimated costs (1980) of new work are $1,188,000 Federal (Corps of Engineers) and $235,000 non-Federal. Total project cost is $1,423,000. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) 31-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 Local cooperation. The 1965 modification provides that local interests will contribute in cash 15 percent of the first cost of the new navigation facilities and 50 percent of the first cost of structural modifications necessary to provide for sport fishing walkway on top of the new east pier, the total of such contributions being $198,000 (Oct 1980 estimate) to be paid in a lump sum prior to initiation of construction and to be subject to final adjustment after actual costs have been determined; provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way required for the construction and subsequent maintenance of the project and for aids to navigation upon the request of the Chief of Engineers, including suitable areas determined by the Chief of Engineers to be required in the general public interest for initial and subsequent disposal of spoil; and necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads and embankments therefore, or the cost of such retaining works; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works and maintenance of the project; provide and maintain with cost to the United States necessary mooring facilities utilities, including an adequate public landing with provision for the sale of motor fuel, lubricants and potable water and a parking lot with adequate sanitary facilities available to all on equal terms and including dredging of berthing areas to depths commensurate with the related project depths; and reserve anchorage spaces and mooring facilities adequate for the accommodation of transient craft. Formal assurances were executed in September 1981. Terminal facilities. There are no permanent docking, mooring or handling facilities. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design efforts were completed to supplement the general design memorandum, prepare environmental impact statement, and prepare construction plans and specifications for recreational boat harbor at a cost of $20,751. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction has not yet started. 10. CHARLEVOIX HARBOR, MICH. Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 276 miles northeasterly from Chicago, Ill., and 75 miles northerly from Frankfort, Mich. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14942.) Existing project. A channel 24 feet deep in Lake Michigan and a river channel 23 feet deep in the lower and upper channels connecting Lake Michigan with Lake Charlevoix via Round Lake. The channels are protected where needed by piers and revetments. For additional details see page 1476 of Annual Report for 1962. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required except the latest project modification is subject to the following: (a) Provide, without cost to the United States, all lands, easements, and rights-ofway required for construction and subsequent maintenance of the modified project upon the request of the Chief of Engineers, including suitable areas determined by the Chief of Engineers, to be required in the general public interest for initial and subsequent disposal of excavated materials and any necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads, and embankments, therefor, or the cost of such retaining works; (b)Hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction and maintenance of the modified, except for damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; (c) Provide and maintain without cost to the United States depths in berthing areas and local access channels serving the terminals commensurate with the depths provided in the related project areas; (d) Accomplish, without cost to the United States, such alterations of submarine utility crossing as are required by the modified project; (e) Establish regulations prohibiting discharge of pollutants into the waters of the harbor by users thereof which regulations shall be in accordance with applicable laws or regulations of Federal, State and local authorities responsible for pollution prevention and control; (f) If acquiring lands, easements and rights-of-way for construction of the project, local interests will comply with the applicable provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970; Public Law 91-646, approved 2 January 1971; (g) Contribute all costs in excess of $1,000,000 should the total cost of construction of the general navigation facilities exceed that amount, in accordance with provisions of Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended. The total first cost of construction is presently estimated at $652,000. Terminal facilities. Several small landing places in Round Lake at Charlevoix for handling fish and miscellaneous commodities, a wharf for petroleum products at west end of Lake Charlevoix, and coal wharves at Advance and Boyne City. Charlevoix, Boyne City, and East Jordan provide public docks for small craft. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, operation of safety features, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost $23,335. A contract was awarded for major repair of North Pier, Sections A&B, and repair Section Al, 31-6 DETROIT, MICH., DISTRICT A2, C, D, F, G, H & I North and South Piers and Revetments. The contract is approximately 40 percent complete at a cost of $793,999. Engineering and design of revetment repair at Park Island was continued at a cost of $4,083. Engineering, design, surveys, layouts, supervision and administration cost $66,129. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was completed in 1939. A controlling depth of 18 feet is available throughout the entire project, except for minor shoaling along the channel limits and shoaling from the U.S. 31 Highway Bridge to 200 feet west and from the north bank to the channel centerline. Total costs to end of fiscal year were $4,197,142 of which $180,623 was for new work, $2,887,123 for maintenance (Emergency Bank Protection $46,352), and $1,129,396 for rehabilitation. 11. CHEBOYGAN HARBOR, MICH. Location. At mouth of Cheboygan River which empties into Western Lake Huron about 16 miles southeast of the Straits of Mackinac Bridge. (See NOAA Nautical Charts 14881 and 14886.) Previous project. For details see page 1956 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1546 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. A channel 21 feet deep and 200 feet wide from 21-foot contour in Lake Huron to outer end of west pier; thence, between lines parallel to and 25 feet from the docks, 21 feet deep from this point to East First Street and thence 18.5 feet deep and 60 feet wide from this bridge to the lock in Cheboygan River; a turning basin 21 feet deep, 400 feet wide, and 420 to 770 feet long on east side of existing project channel just below East First Street; and rubblemound breakwater about 775 feet long on the site of existing west pier at mouth of river. Improvement is 12,000 feet long, of which about 6,000 feet are in Straits of Mackinac. Estimated (1969) cost for recreational facilities is $2,500, excluding $2,500 to be contributed by local interests. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed portions of project and breakwater (1964 Act). The 1964 Act also provides that local interests must contribute in cash 50 percent of the first cost for surfacing breakwater as necessary to provide a safe walkway on breakwater for recreational fishermen, such contribution presently estimated at $2,500 to be paid in a lump sum before start of construction, subject to final adjustment after actual costs are determined. This has not been complied with due to difficulty in obtaining permanent access easement to the breakwater. Terminal facilities. Several privately owned wharves used for receiving coal, stone and petroleum products. Public recreational boating facilities constructed by the State and local agencies are avilable. These facilities satisfy existing commerce and vessel traffic. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, cooperative stream gaging was performed at a cost of $9,790. Engineering and design for repair of North Pier was continued at a cost of $11,670. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was completed in 1950. The latest modification was completed during fiscal year 1969. Controlling depths of 21 feet exist in the channel from Lake Huron to East First Street, including the turning basin; 18.5 feet from East First Street to the State Road Bridge; thence 5.0 feet to the lock at the upper limits of the project. Total costs to end of fiscal year were $995,643 of which $504,236 for new work and $491,407 for maintenance. 12. CLINTON RIVER, MICH. Location. Has its source in Oakland County, Mich, flows easterly about 60 miles and empties into Anchor Bay in northwestern part of Lake St. Clair. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14850.) Previous project. For details see page 1958 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1556 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. An entrance channel in Anchor Bay 8 feet deep, 300 feet wide at 8-foot depth contour in the bay, gradually decreasing to 50 feet wide at about 1,000 feet upstream from mouth of Clinton River, a length of about 4,600 feet; a channel 8 feet deep and 50 feet wide in the river about 38,700 feet long from entrance channel upstream to Mt. Clemens at Cass Avenue; closing old channel and making a cutoff at Shoemakers Bend; closing Catfish Channel; construction of revetments as needed in the river; and a harbor basin, 5 feet deep and 11 acres in area at entrance along bay channel, protected by breakwaters on north and south sides. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. River is used exclusively by recreational craft. There are numerous public and private piers and wharves along river below the City. They are considered 31-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 adequate. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and services were performed at a cost of $31,364. Engineering for contract dredging was to be performed next fiscal year was accomplished at a cost of $515. Engineering and design for a confined disposal area for polluted dredged material was performed at a cost of $2,884. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was completed in 1966. Total costs to end of fiscal year were $1,679,693 of which $260,046 was for new work, $1,129,895 for maintenance, and $289,752 contributed funds for new work. 13. CORNUCOPIA HARBOR, WIS. Location. At mouth of Siskiwit River on South shore of Lake Superior, 49 miles east from Duluth, Minn. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14973.) Existing project. Provides for an entrance channel between piers; an irregular-shaped turning basin; two inner channels, and reconstruction and Federal maintenance of deflection dike and entrance piers constructed by local interests. Project depths are 10 feet between piers and 8 feet in turning basin and inner channels. For additional details see page 1010 of Annual Report for 1965. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. About 1,000 linear feet of privately owned docking space is available. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, miscellaneous inspections and services were performed by Government forces at a cost of $3,790. Repairs to navigation structures were performed at a cost of $45,771. A contract was awarded and completed for maintenance dredging at a cost of $31,701. Approximately 5,300 cubic yards, place measure, of shoal material was removed by hydraulic dredge. Engineering, design, supervision and administration cost $12,336. Condition at end of fiscal year. Work authorized by earlier act was completed in 1939; that for later modification in July 1958 except for extension of east pier, completed in September 1963. Controlling depths at the end of the fiscal year were 9 feet in the harbor entry and 7 feet in the basins. 14. CROSS VILLAGE HARBOR, MICH. Location. On northeast shore of Lake Michigan, about 26 miles northeast of Charlevoix, Michigan. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14902.) Existing project. Provides for two breakwaters having an aggregate length of about 2,300 feet with provisions for recreational fishing on the main breakwater; an anchorage and maneuver area of about eight acres and 10 feet deep and a flared entrance channel 12 feet deep decreasing in width to 100 feet through the breakwaters. Estimated (1980) Federal cost for new work is $2,780,000, excluding $1,730,000 contributed by local interests. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Responsible local interests must furnish assurances that they will contribute in cash 38 percent of the first cost of construction of the general navigation facilities and 50 percent of the first cost of facilities necessary to provide for recreational fishing on the main breakwater, such contributions presently estimated at $1,666,000 and $64,000, respectively, to be paid in a lump sum prior to initiation of construction, subject to final adjustment after actual costs have been determined; provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements and rights-of-way required for the construction and maintenance of the project and of aids to navigation upon the request of the Chief of Engineers, including suitable areas determined by the Chief of Engineers to be required in the general public interest for initial and subsequent disposal of spoil and necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads, and embankments therefor or the costs of such retaining works; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works and subsequent use, operation, and maintenance of the project; provide and maintain without cost to the United States necessary mooring facilities and utilities, including an adequate public landing with provision for the sale of motor fuel, lubricants, potable water, a parking lot with adequate sanitary facilities, and a launching ramp, open to all on equal terms, the dredging of berthing areas to be commensurate with the depth of the Federal channel improvements; establish a competent and properly constituted public body empowered to regulate the use, growth, and development of the harbor and recreationoriented facilities with the understanding that said facilities shall be open to all on equal terms: reserve spaces within the anchorage and mooring facilities adequate for the accommodation of transient craft; provide and maintain, without cost to the United States, for recreational fishing: access facilities, parking areas, and adequate sanitary facilities; establish regulations prohibiting discharge of untreated sewage, garbage, and other pollutants in the waters of the harbor by users thereof, which regulations shall be in accordance with applicable laws or regulations of Federal, State, and local authori 31-8 DETROIT, MICH., DISTRICT ties responsible for pollution prevention and control; bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of the recreational fishing facilities, the amount involved currently being estimated at $4,000 on an average annual basis; and provided further that the improvement for navigation may be undertaken independently of the public recreational fishing facilities on the main breakwater whenever funds for that purpose are available and the required local cooperation has been furnished. Terminal facilities. No facilities are available except a small launching ramp for recreational craft. Complete boating facilities are planned by State and local agencies in connection with the harbor construction. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Work was completed on the Phase I General Design Memorandum reaffirming project feasibility and recommending construction. A public workshop was held in November 1980 in Cross Village to obtain local input to the study process. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement was coordinated with interested agencies and individuals in April 1981. A formal public meeting was held in June 1981. The Final Phase I General Design Memorandum was completed and forwarded to the North Central Division office for approval and the Final Environmental Impact Statement was subsequently circulated for review. Condition at end of fiscal year. The Final Phase I General Design Memorandum and Final Environmental Impact Statement are under review in the North Central Division Office for approval. 15. DETOUR HARBOR, MICH. Location. On the west side of DeTour Passage, about 2 miles upstream from Lake Huron. The passage forms the mouth of the St. Marys River which connects Lakes Huron and Superior. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14882.) Existing project. Provides for small boat harbor and harbor of refuge by dredging a 10-foot deep entrance channel and providing a 8-foot deep access channel protected by a 1,050 foot breakwater. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Improvement authorized on 3 June 1969 under authority of Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act is subject to conditions that prior to project construction, responsible local interests should be required to give satisfactory assurances that they will: Contribute in cash 50 percent of the first cost of construction of the recommended improvement for recreational navigation, exclusive of aids to navigation when the total cost is less than $4,000,000. In addition, also contribute all costs over $4,000,000 should the first costs exceed that amount. The required amount shall be paid in a lump sum payment prior to initiation of construction, or in annual installments over the construction period at a rate proportionate to the proposed or scheduled appropriation of Federal funds, the final apportionment of cost to be made after actual costs have been determined; Provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements and rights-of-way required for construction and maintenance of the project and for aids to navigation upon the request of the Chief of Engineers, including suitable areas determined by the Chief of Engineers to be required in the general public interest for disposal of spoil and any necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads and embankments therefor, or the cost of such retaining works; Hold and save the United States free from all claims for damages incident to the construction, operation and maintenance of the improvements, except for damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its Contractors; Establish a competent and properly constituted public body empowered to regulate the use, growth and development of the harbor and related facilities with the understanding that said facilities will be open to all on equal terms; Provide and maintain without cost to the United States necessary mooring facilities and service areas, including a public landing with suitable supply facilities, reservation of space for transient craft, parking areas with adequate sanitary facilities and access roads, open to all on equal terms; Dredge the berthing areas to a depth commensurate with the depth of the Federal channel improvements; Establish regulations prohibiting discharge of untreated sewage, garbage and other pollutants in the waters of the harbor by users (the Regulations shall be in accordance with applicable laws or regulations of Federal, State and local authorities responsible for pollution prevention and control); Provide any measures necessary to mitigate degraded potable water quality at the existing municipal water treatment plant should water quality, after project construction, fall below that which can be remedied with existing treatment methods; Contribute in cash 50 percent of the first cost of construction of facilities onto the breakwater structure necessary to provide for recreational fishing onto the breakwater and bear all costs of maintenance and replacement of these facilities; Bear all costs of any construction, maintenance, operation, and replacement of onshore facilities;parking areas and sanitary facilities necessary for recreational fishing; In acquiring lands, easements and rights of-way for construction and maintenance of the project, local intersts will comply with the applicable provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisitions Policies Act of 1970, Public 31-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 Law 91-646, approved 2 January 1971. The Michigan Department of Natural Resources has provided an indication of intent to provide the required assurances of local cooperation. Terminal facilities. Public docking, landing, parking and sanitary facilities will be provided by the State of Michigan. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: The contract awarded last fiscal year for construction of recreational boat harbor is approximately 74 percent complete at a cost of $1,694,738. Engineering and design during construction cost $9,449. Supervision and administration cost $37,728. Of the above cost $916,961 was contributed funds. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project is under construction. 16. DETROIT RIVER, MICH. Location. One of the Great Lakes connecting channels, 31 miles long and flows south from Lake St. Clair to Lake Erie. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14848.) Previous project. For details see page 1958 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1541 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Improving Detroit River main channels to provide 25.5-foot draft navigation; improving certain auxiliary and side channels; and construction of various water level and crosscurrent control structures. Details are in accompanying Table 31-C. Project depths are referred to local low water datum planes which correspond to low water datums for Lakes St. Clair and Erie, 571.7 and 568.6 feet above mean water level at Father Point, Quebec (International Great Lakes Datum-1955.)(See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Estimated 1978 Federal cost for new work, exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects, is $159,300,000. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. No local cooperation is required for modifications authorized by acts of July 1946 and March 1956. The Trenton Channel modification approved August 13, 1968 is considered inactive. Terminal facilities. Numerous commercial installations used for handling coal, iron ore, limestone, steel products, petroleum products, and other items such as overseas general cargo. Detail on actual port and harbor facilities is in Port Series No. 45 (revised 1961) prepared and published as part 2 by Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors. Information on port and steamship services is prepared and published as part I by Port Development Staff, U.S. Department of Commerce. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, Hi-Fix surveys, support of Water Control Center, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed at a cost of $1,237,554. Adjustments of $59,999 and $-16,551 was made in costs for maintenance dredging performed last fiscal year by the Hoffman and Lyman. The U.S. Hopper Dredge Hains performed maintenance dredging removing 11,983 cu. yds., bin measure, at a cost of $208,727. This cost is exclusive of financial participation in cost of dredging by industry (obtained as a result of studies on illegal deposits of industrial waste) in the amount of $100,144. The U.S. Hopper Dredges Hains, Hoffman and Lyman performed maintenance of the Pointe Mouillee Access Channel. Approximately 53,127, 32,724, and 37,685 cu. yds., bin measure of shoal material was removed at a cost of $243,155, $133,635 and $99,404, respectively. Operation of the booster pump cost $128,692. A contract was awarded and completed for dredging the Pointe Mouillee Access Channel. Approximately 34,000 cu. yds. of shoal material was removed at a cost of $210,067. The contract awarded last fiscal year for maintenance dredging was completed. Approximately 1,375,693 cubic yards of material was removed at a cost of $6,225,037. Maintenance of disposal areas was performed at a cost of $246,072. Location and removal of obstructions cost $2,779,397. Repairs to compensating dikes cost $58,071. Engineering, design, surveys, layouts, supervision and administration cost $286,796. Settlement of claim was made in the amount of $2,437,310 on contract for construction of Phase I diked disposal area. The contract for construction of Phase II is approximately 95 percent complete. Cost this fiscal year was $5,058,330. Engineering, design, surveys, layouts, supervision and administration cost $508,913. Condition at end of fiscal year. Latest modification of connecting channels project in the Detroit River is complete except for compensating works. All work in Trenton Channel is complete. Pertinent data concerning channels covered by project at end of fiscal year is set forth in Table 31-C. Costs for existing project were $156,785,351 of which $74,780,103 was for new work ($72,969,197 regular funds and $1,530,688 Public Work Funds) and $82,005,248 for maintenance. 17. DULUTH-SUPERIOR HARBOR, MINN. AND WIS. Location. At extreme western end of Lake Superior. 31-10 DETROIT, MICH., DISTRICT Cities of Duluth, Minn., and Superior, Wis., are on north and south sides, respectively. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14975.) Previous projects. See page 1246 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. Provides for rebuilding canal piers at Duluth entry, replacement or construction of piers and breakwater at Superior entry and dredging approaches and channels within harbor, St. Louis Bay, and St. Louis River. Channels vary in depth from 32 to 28 feet in entrances, are 27 feet deep in iron-ore route channels, and are from 20 to 23 feet in inner channels. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) For details of authorized channel dimensions and dimensions of structures, see page 1246 and 1247 of Annual Report for 1962 and page 1011 of Annual Report for 1965. Portion of project for deepening Twenty-first Avenue West Channel is inactive. Estimated cost (1967) of this portion was $577,000. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for active portion of project. Terminal facilities. There are 113 docks or terminals including some 54 major ones; all but one are privately owned: Facilities for handling iron ore, coal, limestone, petroleum, steel and scrap iron, cement, general cargo, and grain are believed adequate for most existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, support of miscellaneous inspections, reports, operation of buildings, grounds and recreation were performed at a cost of $393,011. Repairs to breakwaters and seawalls were performed by Government forces at a cost of $299,208. Maintenance of park, pier and recreational facilities were performed at a cost of $25,764. Maintenance of disposal area was performed at a cost of $54,563. An adjustment of $43,487 was made in cost for maintenance dredging completed last fiscal year. A contract was awarded and completed for dredging. Approximately 180,000 cu. yds. of shore material was removed at a cost of $941,000. Engineering, design, surveys, layouts, supervision and administration cost $173,905. An adjustment of $-1,898 was made in contract for construction of diked disposal area. Condition at end of fiscal year. Work authorized prior to 1960 Act was completed in June 1956. Under the 1960 Act, work on the outer harbor, included in House Document 150, was completed in June 1965. Work on the inner harbor, included in House Document 196, started in May 1963, was completed in November 1968 except for the 21st Avenue West channel portion which is inactive. A detailed project report was completed in November 1974 concerning erosion of a one-half mile of reach of beach adjacent to and south of the Duluth Ship Canal. The United States owns 34.90 acres of land in fee in Minnesota and Wisconsin of which 2.15 acres are used for a vessel yard. Total cost of existing project was $39,766,223 of which $14,562,063 was for new work and $25,204,160 was for maintenance. 18. FOX RIVER, WIS. Location. Rises in Columbia County, Wis., and flows about 176 miles northerly into Green Bay. Wolf River, physically main river but by designation a tributary of Fox River, rises in central part of Fort County, Wis., and flows southerly. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14916 for Lake Winnebago and lower Fox River.) Previous projects. See page 1368 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. Deepening and widening channel of Fox River from DePere 7 miles above mouth to confluence of Wolf River, a total length of 59 miles, to be 6 feet, with 9.6 feet in rock cut below DePere lock and 7 feet in other rock cuts on lower river below Menasha lock; construction and reconstruction of 19 locks and 9 dams; a concrete retaining wall at Kaukauna; construction and maintenance of harbors having depths of 6 feet on Lake Winnebago; widening Neenah Channel to 100 feet, with a 6-foot depth for about 1 mile; and dredging, snagging, and otherwise improving Wolf River 47 miles from its mouth to New London, depth to be 4 feet. Cost of completed portion of project is $513,424 for the lower river exclusive of previous projects. River and Harbor Act of 1925 portion of project is considered inactive and excluded from cost estimate. Estimated cost (1924) of this portion is $2,886,000. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Wharf and landing facilities are in general, adequate for existing needs. (See Table 31-E on locks and dams, Fox River, Wis.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed at a cost of $142,886. 31-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 A study for emergency plans for Federal Dams was performed at a cost of $7,041. Water Control studies and monitoring was performed at a cost of $136,451. Locks and dams were operated and maintained at a cost of $744,521. Gates were painted and sandblasted at Kaukauna first lock at a cost of $59,036. Rebuilding of fates and values and security fence was performed for the 2nd Appleton Lock at a cost of $151,358. Rebuilding of gates and values was performed for the 3rd Appleton Lock at a cost of $14,550. Repair to the Levee Bank cost $150,811. Approximately $35,802 was spent under the OSHA and Energy Program. Engineering, design, miscellaneous maintenance, supervision and administration cost $113,422. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project is complete except for inactive portion. Nineteen original locks and nine original dams have been rebuilt. (See Table 31-E for year of completion of each.) Structures and dredging in pools have increased original depths generally about 2 feet. Work remaining to complete project consists of dredging in upper portion of Wolf River, and rock removal and deepening of Neenah Channel on lower Fox River, which are no longer considered necessary. Except for Menasha lock, which should be rebuilt, existing locks and dams are in generally fair to good condition. Costs for existing project to end of fiscal year were $513,424 for new work and $29,515,247 for operation and maintenance, a total of $30,028,671. Funds in the amount of $3,706,187 were expended between July 5, 1884, and June 30, 1935, on operating and care of works if improvement under provisions of permanent indefinite appropriation for such purposes. 19. FRANKFORT HARBOR, MICH. Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 204 miles northeasterly from Chicago and 28 miles northerly from Manistee, Mich. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14907). Existing project. Provides for constructing an exterior basin in Lake Michigan formed by two breakwaters, 450 feet apart at the outer ends, diverging at an angle of about 90 degrees, the main arm and shore connection on north breakwater are 972 and 1,000 feet long, respectively, and the main arm and shore connection of south breakwater 1,188 and 1,400 feet long, respectively; for removing 801 feet of north and 1,172 feet of south pier ; dredging basin 20 feet deep and 800 feet wide at entrance, decreasing toward new pier heads to 600 feet wide, dredging approach and entrance channel through outer basin to a depth of 24 feet from deep water in Lake Michigan to a point 500 feet landward of opening between breakwaters, over the entire width outside the breakwaters and to a maximum width of 500 feet inside the breakwaters; thence to 23 feet deep through inner portion of outer basin to outer end of north pier, over widths decreasing from 500 to 160 feet; and thence to 22 feet deep between the piers to the inner basin in Lake Betsie; dredging an 18-foot deep interior basin in Lake Betsie from within 50 feet of existing structures on the west and extending eastward about 1,550 feet to easterly boundary and from within 50 feet of existing structures on the north and extending southward 800 feet to the southerly boundary; dredging a recreational craft anchorage area 10 feet deep and 300 feet wide, extending 600 feet eastward of the east limit of the interior basin, with its north side in line with the north limit of the basin. Breakwaters and shore connections are built of concrete caissons and piling capped with concrete. Inner piers and revetments are built of storiefilled timber cribs and piling, all capped with concrete, except for 476 feet of south revetment which consists of steel sheet piling. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminalfacilities. Two car ferry slips on south shore and several docks along north shore of Lake Betsie. The City and State provide a recreational docking facility on northside of Lake Betsie which is open to all on equal terms. There is also a marine railway capable of handling small craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, operation of safety features, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by government forces at a cost of $46,936. Riprap of North and South Breakwater was performed by Government Plant at a cost of $52,074. An adjustment of $-34,443 was made in contract cost for repairs to Sections M, N, 0 and P of north revetment and south pier. Engineering and design for Sections 0, P, L1 and K was continued at a cost of $68,588. Engineering, surveys, layouts supervision and administration cost $5,642. Engineering and design for a confined disposal area for polluted dredged material was completed at a cost of $64,778. Award of contract for construction of disposal area is scheduled for early fiscal year 1982. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was completed in 1939, with exception of the latest modification which was completed in 1969. Navigation structures are generally above emergency repair condition and programmed for major repair on an as needed basis. For additional details 31-12 - - DETROIT, MICH., DISTRICT on completion of existing project see page 1474 of Annual Report for 1962. Total costs for existing project to end of fiscal year were $7,026,227 of which $1,955,159 (including $31,709 contributed funds) was for new work, $4,796,292 for maintenance and $274,776 for rehabilitation. 20. GRAND HAVEN HARBOR AND GRAND RIVER, MICH. Location. Harbor is on east shore of Lake Michigan, 108 miles northeasterly from Chicago, Ill., and 23 miles northerly from Holland, Mich. River rises in Jackson County, Mich., and flows 260 miles westerly into Lake Michigan. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14933, and Geological Survey Grand Rapids quadrangle.) Previous project. For details see page 1949 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1481 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. An entrance channel protected by parallel piers and revetments at mouth of Grand River, a deep draft channel in river extending to Spring Lake, a turning basin, and a shallow draft channel in river extending 14.5 miles upstream to Bass River. Project depths are 23 feet in entrance channel, 21 feet in river to turning basin, 18 feet in turning basin and channel to Spring Lake, and 8 feet in upper Grand River channel. For additional details see page 1461 of Annual Report for 1962. Dredging on northerly side of inner channel is considered inactive. Estimated cost of this portion (1954) is $38,600. (See Table 31-B for autorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Several wharves exist for handling coal, limestone, sand and gravel, petroleum products, fish and miscellaneous commodities. There is also a car ferry slip which is inactive. The State and local agencies provide recreational boating facilities which are open to all on equal terms. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, operation of safety features, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed at a cost of $69,042. Placing of stone on the North Pier was performed at a cost of $64,655. Engineering and design for repair of North Pier Section E was completed. A contract in the amount of $1,235,052. The contract is approximately 81 percent complete at a cost of $1,200,000. The U.S. Hopper Dredge Hains performed maintenance dredging removing 38,565 cubic yards, bin measure, of shoal material at a cost of $136,223. Maintenance of the disposal area was performed at a cost of $5,990. Engineering, design, surveys, supervision and administration cost $119,975. An adjustment of $-60,000 was made in the shore erosion mitigation Section 111 cost for work performed last fiscal year. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was substantially completed in 1949. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1463 of Annual Report for 1962. Structures are generally above emergency repair on an as needed basis. Total cost of existing project to end of fiscal year were $15,799,868 of which $1,458,469 was for new work, $13,527,786 for maintenance and $813,613 for rehabilitation. 21. GRAND MARAIS HARBOR, MINN. Location. On north shore of Lake Superior, 106 miles northeasterly from Duluth, Minn. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14967.) Existing project. Provides breakwater piers to narrow the entrance; concrete seawalls across ledge at southeast corner of harbor; an anchorage area and a small-boat basin protected by a rubblemound breakwater. Project depths are 16 feet in anchorage area increasing to 20 feet near entrance and 8 feet in small-boat basin. For additional details see page 1014 of Annual Report for 1965. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Two inactive pulpwood wharves and several fish wharves, all privately owned. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and miscellaneous inspection and services were performed by Government forces at a cost of $4,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project is complete. Concrete seawall and both breakwaters are in good condition. 22. GRAND TRAVERSE BAY HARBOR, MICH. Location. At mouth of Traverse River on eastern shore of Keweenaw Peninsula about 20 miles northeasterly from 31-13 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 Portage entry to Keweenaw Waterway. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14964.) Existing projects. Provides two parallel piers, an entrance channel between piers and a harbor basin. Project depths are 12 feet between piers and 10 feet in basin. Project area extended 200 feet upstream in 1966. For additional details see page 1015 of Annual Report for 1965. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests furnished easements on 5.1 acres of land. Terminal facilities. Several privately owned fishing wharves. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscelleneous inspections and reports were performed at a cost of $11,730. A contract in the amount of $36,712 was awarded for maintenance dredging. The contract is in the process of being cancelled with only $4,800 being spent this fiscal year. Engineering, design, surveys, supervision and administration cost $7,605. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was completed in 1950 except for extension of north pier completed in 1964. Construction of a 164-foot extension to the north breakwater was completed. Steel cells and piers are in good condition. Timber and round wood-pile structures are deteriorated but still in serviceable condition. 23. GREEN BAY HARBOR, WIS. Location. At mouth of Fox River, at head of Green Bay, about 180 miles from Milwaukee, Wis., via Sturgeon Bay Canal, and about 49 miles southwest of Menominee Harbor, Mich., and Wis. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14918.) Previous projects. See page 1366 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. See Chicago District 1979 Annual Report, Table 30-C, p. 30-30. For more detailed description of project see page 1216 of Annual Report for 1963. Cost of completed portion of project is $9,334,421, Federal, and non-Federal cost is $490,000 including $100,000 contributed funds. Local interests requested that the inactive portion of the 1962 River and Harbor Act, consisting of dredging the reach from 150 feet downstream of the C.&N.W. Railway Bridge to 1,700 feet upstream of this bridge, be reactivated and the authorization modified to include deepening the adjacent turning basin and modifying the C.&N.W. Railway Bridge to provide increased horizontal clearance. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 16 wharves for handling coal, petroleum products, cement, limestone, general overseas cargo and miscelleneous commodities. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed at a cost of $100,157. The U.S. Hopper Dredge Markham performed maintenance dredging removing 559,507 cubic yards, bin measure of shore material at a cost of $840,323. Additional handling of dredge material cost $54,784. Dredging of the mooring basin was performed. Approximately 34,175 cubic yards of material was removed at a cost of $103,464. Maintenance of disposal area was performed at a cost of $53,456. Engineering, design, supervision and administration cost $28,930. An adjustment of $-236,094 was made in contract cost for construction of diked disposal area. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project is complete. The 1962 modification was started in November 1966 and completed in September 1973. Dredging turning basin above Chicago & Northwestern Railway Bridge was commenced in August 1938. The turning basin was enlarged under authority of Section 5 of the River and Harbor Act of 4 March 1915 in order to provide sufficient area for the large ships that use it. The work was performed as part of a maintenance dredging contract in September and October 1973. East revetment at Grassy Island was entirely removed in July 1935. Dredging Fox River and entrance channel to Tail Point Light was completed in September 1967. The total costs of the existing project were $24,553,396 of which $18,005,884 were regular funds and $940,800 Public Works funds; $9,429,886 for new work and $15,123,510 for maintenance. The new work costs do not include $100,000 contributed funds. 24. HAMMOND BAY HARBOR, MICH. Location. On northwest shore of Lake Huron, 35 miles 31-14 DETROIT, MICH., DISTRICT southeast of straits of Mackinac. (See Great Lakes Chart 14881.) Existing project. Provides for a harbor of refuge, protected by breakwater structures, extending to 12-foot depth contour in the lake; for dredging a harbor basin 10 feet deep; and for dredging an entrance channel 12 feet deep. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Public facilities being planned by State and local agencies. Plans and specifications are complete, but construction has not started. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Section 111 Detailed Project Report was approved by the office of the Chief of Engineers in April 1980. No funds were provided for work on Plans and Specifications during fiscal year 1981. Maintenance: Condition survey, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $4,148. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was completed in 1965. 25. HARBOR BEACH HARBOR, MICH. Location. On west shore of Lake Huron about 60 miles north of Port Huron, Mich. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14862.) Existing project. Harbor of refuge protected by three breakwaters; a main entrance 23 feet deep; and an anchorage area 21 feet deep. For additional details see page 1485 of Annual Report for 1962. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Coal and limestone are received at a private wharf. In addition there is a public recreational craft pier, a Coast Guard pier, and several small installations engaged in docking and servicing light-draft commercial and recreational vessels. These facilities satisfy current commerce and traffic requirements. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspection and services were performed at a cost of $14,035. The contract for repair to north breakwater awarded last fiscal year was completed at a cost of $18,473. Engineering, supervision and administration cost $7,494. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was completed in 1928. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1485 of Annual Report for 1962. Total costs to end of fiscal year were $6,007,392 of which $1,200,598 was for new work, $4,612,290 for maintenance, and $194,504 for rehabilitation. Private interests have offered to provide a confined disposal facility for dredged material. 26. HARRISVILLE HARBOR, MICH. Location. On the west shore of Lake Huron, 20 miles north of Oscoda and 30 miles south of Alpena. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14864.) Existing project. A harbor of refuge protected by breakwater structures, and dredging an entrance channel 12 feet deep and a harbor basin 10 feet deep. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Dockage facilities built by State and local agencies for recreational craft. These are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed at a cost of $1,054. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project completed in fiscal year 1960. Controlling depths are 12 feet in the entrance channel and 10 feet in the harbor basin. 27. HOLLAND HARBOR, MICH. Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan 95 miles northeasterly from Chicago, Ill., and 23 miles southerly from Grand Haven, Mich. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14932.) Previous project. For details see page 1948 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1478 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. An outer breakwater protected approach 31-15 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 channel in Lake Michigan, an entrance channel to Lake Macatawa protected by piers and revetments, a channel through Lake Macatawa into Black River, and a turning basin. Project depths are 23 feet in outer portion of approach channel decreasing to 21 feet at outer end of inner piers, 21 feet to upper end of project, and 18 feet in turning basin. For additional details see page 1458 of Annual Report for 1962. Widening bend of entrance channel into Lake Macatawa is considered inactive. Estimated cost of this portion (1956) is $449,500. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed portions of project. Work authorized by act of 1954 is subject to condition that work on either or both proposed modifications may be undertaken by the United States provided local interests furnish all lands except 1.5 acres of Federal lands, easements, rights-of-way, and suitable spoil disposal areas for initial work and future maintenance; remove buildings and other structures, except existing revetments, from lands to be furnished; and hold the United States free from damages. Terminal facilities. Wharves are at inner end of Lake Macatawa, and used for handling coal, building materials, petroleum products, and miscellaneous commodities. Two shipbuilding yards are on south shore of the lake. Holland provides a public wharf for small craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: The authorized project has been completed except for the bend widening of the navigation entrance channel between Lake Michigan and Lake Macatawa. A reclassification study analyzed project feasibility, established local cooperation, and recommended reclassification of the project from deferred to an active category to initiate preconstruction planning to complete the channel widening. The reclassification recommendation was approved by the office of the Chief of Engineers on 20 August 1981. Federal study costs through September 1981 were $65,000. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $48,494. Riprapping of the north and south breakwater was performed by Government forces at a cost of $51,121. The contract for repair of South Pier Section I&J awarded last fiscal year was completed at a cost of $37,257. Claims are negotiated on this contract. The U.S. Hopper Dredge Hains performed maintenance dredging removing 88,439 cubic yards, bin measure, of shoal material at a cost of $260,572. Maintenance dredging of the settling basin was performed using the sand bypass equipment at a cost of $33,421. Maintenance of the disposal area was performed at a cost of $6,186. Engineering and design for repair of Sections A&B south breakwater was continued at a cost of $54,122. Engineering, design, surveys, maintenance of safety features, supervision and administration cost $70,021. Maintenance of shore erosion mitigation under Section 111 program was performed at a cost of $6,325. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project with exception of widening bend in revetted entrance channel authorized by Act of September 3, 1954, was completed in 1957. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1460 of Annual Report for 1962. Costs of existing project to end of fiscal year were $1,392,841 for new work ($1,180,502 regular funds, $176,620 for previous project and $35,705 contributed funds), $8,077910 regular funds for maintenance, and $502,452 regular funds for rehabilitation, for a total of $9,470,752. 28. THE INLAND ROUTE, MICH. Location. A series of interconnected lakes and streams stretching across northern tip of Lower Peninsula of Michigan, and extends from Conway near Lake Michigan, to Cheboygan on Lake Huron; a distance of 35 miles. Crooked and Indian Rivers are connecting channels in the waterway. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14886.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 30 feet wide and 5 feet deep, with necessary widening at bends, through Crooked and Indian Rivers, and Crooked, Burt, and Mullett Lakes, and from Conway (west end of Crooked Lake) to navigation lock at Cheboygan; in Pickerel Channel from Pickerel Lake to Crooked Lake. It also provides for suitable jetties at head of Indian River. The addition of a lock and dam was approved by the Chief of Engineers on September 2, 1964, to correct a design deficiency. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. None for commercial cargo-handling exist along the Crooked and Indian Rivers. Numerous small privately owned timber piers and wharves, some equipped with covered boat wells for serving and storing recreational craft, have been constructed. Landings maintained by hotel and resort operators are open to the public for transfer of passengers. Public docks are at Conway and Oden on Crooked Lake; the Village of Indian River, Topinabee, and Mullett Lake Village on Mullett Lake; and at Cheboygan. About 30 Highways dead end at the water's edge, permitting public access for various marine activities. Dock facilities are considered adequate for existing traffic. 31-16 DETROIT, MICH., DISTRICT Operations and results during fiscal year. The navigation lock was maintained and operated on a two shift basis 1 October through 15 November 1980. The lock was reopened for navigation 15 April 1981. The State of Michigan operated and maintained the lock at a cost of $99,989. Condition surveys, cooperative stream gaging, miscellaneous inspections and services were performed at a cost of $59,224. Engineering and design for a confined disposal area for polluted dredged material was completed at a cost of $27,013. Award of contract for construction of disposal area is scheduled for early fiscal year 1982. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was completed in 1958. The lock and dam was completed in fiscal year 1968. For additional details see page 1382 of Annual Report for 1960. Total costs at end of fiscal year were $2,441,867 of which $770,222 was for new work and $1,523,- 645 for maintenance with $148,000 contributed by local interests. 29. KENOSHA HARBOR, WIS. Location. On west shore of Lake Michigan about 35 miles south of Milwaukee and about 54 miles north of Chicago. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14904.) Previous projects. See page 1390 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. See Table 30-C. For detailed description see page 1237, Annual Report for 1963. Estimated (1975) Federal cost is $552,000 exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects. Non-Federal estimate is $43,000 (July 1975) including $3,000 contributed by local interests. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Three wharves used for miscellaneous foreign overseas commodities and autos, and also several fishing wharves. While these facilities are considered generally adequate for existing commerce, more efficient use of existing terminals and utilization of available frontage for development of additional terminals should be made. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous, nspections and services were performed by Government orces at a cost of $20,679. Repairs to concrete cap base on letached breakwater were performed at a cost of $17,621. Engineering, design, supervision, administration and other miscellaneous item cost $23,695. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project is complete except for dredging 25 foot strips adjacent to the north and south piers which will be completed after rehabilitation of the piers. The north and south piers were completed in 1900, and the breakwater in 1909. The north piers is in excellent condition. The south pier and breakwater are in generally fair condition. The total cost of the existing project to end of fiscal year were $7,935,557 of which $7,907,899 were regular funds and $27,658 Emergency Relief funds; $390,130 being for new work, $6,275,152 for maintenance and $1,270,- 275 for rehabilitation. The new work costs do not include $3,000 contributed funds. 30. KEWAUNEE HARBOR, WIS. Location. On west shore of Lake Michigan, about 105 miles north of Milwaukee and about 78 miles from Green Bay, via Sturgeon Bay Canal. Harbor is at mouth of Kewaunee River. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14903.) Previous projects. See page 1375 of Annual Report of 1962. Existing project. See Chicago District 1979 Annual Report, Table 30-C, p. 30-31. Costs of completed project at $603,021, Federal, and $9,000 non-Federal, exclusive of amount expended on previous projects. Uncompleted portion (estimated $200,000-July 1965) of 1935 River and Harbor Act is considered inactive, and excluded from present cost estimate. The portion authorized by the 1960 River and Harbor Act was deauthorized in 1977. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Two car-ferry slips, a petroleum tank farm, a Corps of Engineers project office, and several fishing wharves. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspection and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $5,317. Minor repairs were made to navigation structures at a cost of $1,376. Supervision and administration cost $258. Engineering and design for construction of a confined disposal area for polluted dredged material was 31-17 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 completed at a cost of $55,742. A contract was awarded in the amount of $2,016,665 for construction of this facility. The contract is approximately 78 percent complete at a cost of $1,644,998. Supervision and administration of contract cost $70,259. Condition at end of fiscal year. Active portion of existing project is complete. The north pier was completed in 1897 and the remaining portion is in generally good condition. Rehabilitation of the south pier was completed in June 1967. Construction of north breakwater and shore connection, except for a gap of 150 feet about 830 feet from shoreward end, and removal of outer 706.5 linear feet of north pier were commenced in September 1935 and completed in June 1937. Removed 500 linear feet of north pier in April May 1963 and widened and deepened the adjacent channel in 1965. Outer end of the north pier was struck and severely damaged by car ferry vessel in October 1973 and a 24 foot section at outer end was subsequently removed, thus reducing the structure to a length of 626 feet. Dredging entrance channel and interior basin to existing project depth was commenced in April and completed in October 1938. Kewaunee River is navigable off about 6.5 miles above mouth for craft drawing not more than 4 feet. Total cost of existing project to end of fiscal year was $5,036,101, of which $603,021 was for new work ($183,021 regular and $420,000 emergency relief funds) $3,815,780 regular funds for maintenance and $617,300 regular funds for rehabilitation. 31. KEWEENAW WATERWAY, MICH. Location. In Lake Superior across Keweenaw Peninsula in upper Michigan. The west entrance is 169 miles east of Duluth, Minn. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14972.) Existing project. A navigable channel, minimum width 300 feet, 25 miles long, partially natural and partially artificial across Keweenaw Peninsula via Portage Lake. For details see page 1121 of Annual Report for 1963. Completed cost for new work is $5,967,700. Portion of project providing for extension of lower entrance breakwater and necessary alteration or replacement of structures due to deepening channels is inactive and excluded from foregoing cost. Estimated cost (1957) of this portion was $3,315,000. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Six coal docks, a petroleum dock, and several general merchandise and miscellaneous wharves, all privately owned. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Also present is a government constructed recreational area with facilities to include a picnic area and small boat landing range. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, operation of recreational facilities, environmental studies and miscellaneous inspections cost $8,523. Repair to breakwater was performed at a cost of $484,319. Maintenance of recreational facility costs $1,043. Engineering, surveys, supervision and administration costs $12,602. Condition at end of fiscal year. Active portion of the project is complete. Breakwaters are in generally good condition except for a weakness occurring in about 300 feet of substructure of breakwater lower entrance, and major storm damage repairs needed for stone-covered portions of breakwaters at upper entrance. Mooring pier at Lily Pond requires repairs to halt movement and permit dredging to project depth adjacent thereto. The flared revetment at the upper entry should be modified to restrict wave action from the stilling basin entrance. 32. KNIFE RIVER HARBOR, MINN. Location. Near mouth of Knife River on north shore of Lake Superior, 19 miles northeasterly from Duluth, Minn., and 7 miles southwest of Two Harbors, Minn. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14966.) Existing project. Provides for an entrance channel with a system of overlapping breakwaters, using the existing breakwater and a new breakwater constructed of 451 feet of rock rubblemound, and four 62.8-foot diameter steel sheet pile cells. The entrance channel is 9 feet deep and an inner straight channel is 8 feet deep, 50 feet wide, and 600 feet long with a public marina and side channel at its inner end. For additional details see page 1110 of Annual Report for 1963. A modification to correct a design deficiency was authorized in 1974. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Total estimated approved Federal cost is $1,761,700 and $21,000 non-Federal cost. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests furnished easements on 15.08 acres of land. Terminal facilities. Local interests have installed pileand- timber docks on both sides of straight channel. Lake County has completed construction by contract of a marina along the east wing of the inner harbor. 31-18 DETROIT, MICH., DISTRICT Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering plans for a modification to correct a design deficiency were revised and progressed toward 50 percent completion at a cost of $44,500. Maintenance: Condition surveys, miscellaneous inspections and services were performed at a cost of $313. Adjustment of $3,735 was made in cost for repair of structures completed last fiscal year. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was completed in June 1958. Breakwater and spending beach are in good condition. The existing breakwater does not effectively prevent waves caused by northeasterly winds from entering the entrance channel. This results in unsatisfactory and unsafe harbor entrance conditions during storms. Mooring conditions in the main channel and Y-branches of the inner harbor are also adversely affected. Plans and specifications for construction of a breakwater to reduce wave damage and improve navigation conditions have been completed. 33. LA POINTE HARBOR, WIS. Location. At westerly end of Madeline Island in the Apostle Island group off the south shore of Lake Superior. (See Lake Survey Chart 961.) Existing project. Provides for reconstruction of 73.5 feet of the existing breakwater, extending the breakwater 126.24 feet with 5 new steel sheet pile cells, harbor dredging and related work. The harbor is 10 feet deep in the entrance and 8 feet deep in the basin. Project was authorized by Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act (Public Law 645, 86th Cong., as amended.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. A 400-foot L-shaped dock was constructed and rehabilitated by local interests, not as a part of the federal project. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and miscellaneous services were performed at a cost of $1,899. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was completed in 1967. Total cost of existing project at end of fiscal year is $193,476. 34. LAKE ST. CLAIR, MICH. CHANNELS Location. Lake. St. Clair, a section of Great Lakes connecting channels, is an expansive shallow basin having a vessel track length of about 15 miles from mouth of St. Clair River to head of Detroit River. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14850.) Previous project. For details see page 2882, Annual Report for 1896; pages 1957-58, Annual Report for 1915; and page 1539, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. An improved channel through Lake St. Clair 800 feet wide, 27.5 feet deep, and about 14.5 miles long; extending from mouth of Southeast Bend cutoff channel at lower end of St. Clair River to head to Detroit River Channel. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. None. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, support of Water Control Center, Hi Fix Surveys, miscellaneous inspections and report were performed by Government forces at a cost of $62,146. Maintenance of disposal area was performed at a cost of $24,924. An adjustment of $-12,657 was made in cost for maintenance dredging by the Markham performed last fiscal year. Engineering and design cost $529. Preparation of Operation & Maintenance manual for the confined disposal area was continued at a cost of $1,320. Condition at end of fiscal year. Total costs for existing project at end of fiscal year were $16,689,477 of which $7,019,237 was for new work ($6,010,582 regular funds and $1,008,595 public works funds) and $9,905,586 for maintenance. 35. LELAND HARBOR, MICH. Location. A light-draft harbor on eastern shore of Lake Michigan at mouth of Carp River, about 40 miles north of Frankfort, Mich., and 40 miles southwest of Charlevoix, Mich. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14912.) Existing project. Provides for a harbor of refuge consisting 31-19 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 of a breakwater about 1,200 feet long, a protected anchorage and maneuver are about 3 acres in extend and 10 feet deep, a 12-foot deep flared approach channel decreasing in width to 90 feet, an existing south pier 440 feet long, a 35-foot long cellular extension to south pier, an entrance channel 6 feet deep and 40 feet wide extending to mouth of Carp River, and for elimination of existing north pier. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Privately owned wharves on each side of river below the dam which is 400 feet above the river mouth. These wharves serve the local fishing interests and recreational craft. Public facilities are operated by the State and local agencies. All available dockage space is utilized. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and services were performed at a cost of $9,482. An adjustment of $-27,777 was made in dredging contract completed last fiscal year. A contract was awarded and completed for maintenance dredging at a cost of $46,613. Approximately 15,557 cubic yards, place measure, of shoal material was removed by hydraulic dredge. Engineering, -surveys, supervision and administration cost $11,465. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was completed in 1932 except for the authorization of 1962 which was completed in 1967. Total costs of existing project to the end of fiscal year were $1,873,524, of which $1,027,089 was for new work and $846,435 for maintenance. 36. LEXINGTON HARBOR, MICH. Location. On southwest shore of Lake Huron, 20 miles north of Port Huron, Michigan. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14862.) Existing project. Provides for two offshore breakwaters opening to the southeast and totaling about 2,400 feet long with provisions for recreational fishing on the main breakwater; an anchorage and maneuver area of about 5 acres, 8 feet deep; and a flared approach channel 10 feet deep, decreasing to 160 feet in width through the breakwaters. Project also provides for recreational fishing facilities. Estimated (1979) Federal cost for new work is $1,647,306 excluding $1,088,888 to be contributed by local interests. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Assurances of local cooperation were furnished by Michigan Department of Natural Resources to the Secretary of the Army. The cash contribution was $1,088,888. Terminal facilities. An existing public fishing pier of open pile construction is not adequate for existing and prospective commerce. Complete boating facilities are planned by State and local agencies in connection with the harbor construction. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Placing of sand using the sand bypass equipment was completed at a cost of $142,716. Engineering, design, supervision and administration cost $34,440. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was completed during fiscal year 1977. 37. LITTLE LAKE HARBOR, MICH. Location. On south shore of Lake Superior 21 miles west of Whitefish Point and 30 miles east of Grand Marais, Mich. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14962.) Existing project. Provides for a small-craft into harbor of refuge by dredging an entrance channel 12 feet deep from Lake Superior into Little Lake, suitably protected by breakwaters and revetments. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Only terminal facility at project site consists of a public dock built by State of Michigan for lightdraft craft. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and services were performed by Government forces at a cost of $8,286. The design deficiency study was continued at a cost of $27,083. A contract was awarded and completed for maintenance dredging at a cost of $104,450. Approximately 27,000 cubic yards, place measure, of shoal material was removed by hydraulic dredge. Engineering, design, surveys, layouts, supervision and administration cost $28,303. Condition at end of fiscal year. This project is considered complete; however, because of shifting sand the harbor entrance shoals rapidly with the result that full project depth 31-20 DETROIT, MICH., DISTRICT is not usually available. An analysis for the Design Deficiency Report was submitted to North Central Division in March 1978 and approved. Total cost at end of fiscal year is $2,414,239. 38. LUDINGTON HARBOR, MICH. Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 156 miles northeasterly from Chicago, Ill., and 67 miles northerly from Grand Haven, Mich. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14937.) Previous project. For details see page 1951 of Annual Report for 1915, page 1491 of Annual Report for 1938, and page 1307 of Annual Report for 1963. Existing project. Provides for an exterior basin in Lake Michigan protected by north and south breakwater, north breakwater is 1,800 feet long and south breakwater 1,700 feet long, 550 feet apart at outer ends, diverging at an angle of 90 degrees, with shore connections, 1,103 and 2,004 feet long, respectively; for dredging exterior basin to 18 feet deep with a maximum width of 1,500 feet; for a channel with a depth of 29 feet from deep water in Lake Michigan decreasing to 27 feet at the west end of the north pier, over a maximum width of 600 feet; thence a channel with a depth of 27 feet, over a minimum width of 230 feet with necessary widening at Pere Marquette Lake; and for inner piers and revetments 1,649 feet long on north and sufficiently long on the south for turn at Pere Marquette Lake. The estimated (1977) Federal cost for new work is $8,250.000. Estimated total costs for local interests is $147,000. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Has been complied with. Terminal facilities. In addition to main terminal of Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co., consisting of three car ferry slips, a wharf, and warehouses, there are several wharves which handle coal, limestone, and miscellaneous commodities. Facilities adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: The contract for construction of latest project modification was completed. Cost this fiscal year was $6,686 Federal funds. Engineering, design, supervision and administration cost $33,528. Placing of sand in connection with beach nourishment (mitigation) was completed at a cost of $1,355. Maintenance: Condition surveys, operation of safety features, environmental studies and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed at a cost of $58,957. Completion of contract for repairs to south breakwater and north revetment cost $92,932. Maintenance of safety features was peformed at a cost of $3,866. Breakwater maintenance cost $1,686. The U.S. Hopper Dredge Hains performed maintenance dredging removing 34,190 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $92,224. Engineering, design, supervision and administration cost $30,194. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was completed in 1918. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1469 of Annual Report for 1962. Total costs for existing project to end of fiscal year were $14,716,776 of which $8,443,143 was for new work, $5,915,728 for maintenance, and $357,913 for rehabilitation. 39. LUTSEN HARBOR, MINN. Location. The relocated harbor is located at the mouth of the Poplar River on the north shore of Lake Superior, 79 miles northeasterly from Duluth, Minn., and 30 miles southwesterly from Grand Marais, Minn. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14967.) Existing project. Project as modified provides for two rubblemound breakwaters totaling 1,400 feet, with an excavated harbor basin approximately 2 acres with an 8-foot depth. For additional details see page 1658 of Annual Report for 1945 for improvements authorized by the River and Harbor Act approved March 2, 1945. (II. Doc. No 446, 78th Cong., 2d sess.). This document contains latest published map. Estimated Federal cost(1981) for new work is $7,070,000 and non-Federal cost is $406,000. Local cooperation. See page 1658 of Annual Report for 1945. Local interests furnished local assurances in December 1969 and again in December 1976, and confirmed in October 1979. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Preconstruction planning was continued by hired labor at a cost of $81,533. Condition at end of fiscal year. Preconstruction planning is nearing completion with the Phase II General Design Memorandum being completed and work on the construction plans and specifications initiated. 40. MANISTEE HARBOR, MICH. 31-21 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 179 miles northeasterly from Chicago, Ill., and 26 miles northerly from Ludington, Mich. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14938.) Previous project. For details see page 1952 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1493 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. An entrance channel in Lake Michigan protected by a breakwater, piers, and revetments; a channel in Manistee River to Manistee Lake; and Federal participation in costof replacing Maple Street Bridge. Project depths are 25 feet in entrance channel and 23 feet in river channel. For additional details see page 1470 of Annual Report for 1962. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Installations are on both sides of river and on Manistee Lake. Commerce handled includes coal, sand, salt, and general cargo. In addition, there is a Government wharf and a State and City owned recreational craft pier which is open to the public. These facilities satisfy current commerce requirements. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed at a cost of $14,175. Riprapping along the south pier and breakwater was performed at a cost of $40,592. Engineering, design, supervision and administration cost $3,513. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was completed in August 1967. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1470 of Annual Report for 1962. Total costs for existing project from regular funds to end of fiscal year were $6,808,192 of which $2,341,523 was for new work, $3,092,505 for maintenance, and $1,374,164 for rehabilitation. 41. MANISTIQUE HARBOR, MICH. Location. On north shore of Lake Michigan 135 miles northeasterly from Green Bay Harbor, Wis., and 220 miles northerly from Milwaukee, Wis. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14908.) Previous project. For details see page 1933 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1422 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. A breakwater protected entrance channel in Lake Michigan, a channel in Manistique River, and a pier at river mouth. Project depths are 19 feet in outer portion of entrance channel, 18 feet in inner portion of entrance channel, and 18 feet in river channel. For additional details see page 1451 of Annual Report for 1962. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. A car ferry slip, two coal and building material wharves, two fishing wharves, and numerous lumberyard slips. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, miscellaneous inspection and reports were performed at a cost of $2,500. Repair to the breakwater was performed at a cost of $94,008. Engineering, design, supervision and administration cost $2,492. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was completed in 1961. For additional details on completion of existing project see Annual Report for 1962. All structures are generally in good condition. Project is being maintained to 12 feet below I.G.L.D. in lieu of authorized depths which is adequate for current usage. Total costs to end of fiscal year were $3,154,053 of which $1,299,355 was for new work, $1,538,365 for maintenance, and $316,333 for rehabilitation. 42. MANITOWOC HARBOR, WIS. Location. On west shore of Lake Michigan about 79 miles north of Milwaukee and about 106 miles from Green Bay via Sturgeon Bay Canal. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14922.) Previous projects. See page 1379 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. See Chicago District Annual Report for 1979, Table 30-C. For detailed description see page 1228 of Annual Report for 1963. Estimated costs (1970) of new work for 1968 modification are $81,000 Federal and $30,000 non-Federal which includes a cash contribution of $18,000. Work on the 1968 modification has been postponed. The portion authorized by the 1962 River and Harbor Act is inactive and estimated (1970) at $1,150,000, Federal, and $105,000 non-Federal. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Construction of a small boat harbor within the existing harbor was authorized by the Chief of Engineers, 26 June 1979, under authority of Section 107, 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended. 31-22 -- DETROIT, MICH., DISTRICT Local cooperation. Fully complied with for complete modifications. For 1968 modification local interests must contribute in cash 18 percent of the first cost of the general navigation facilities, comprising extension of the deep-draft channel, such contribution being presently estimated at $18,000 (1970 price level), to be paid in a lump-sum before construction is started and to be subject to final adjustment after actual costs have been determined; provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way required for construction and subsequent maintenance of the project modification upon the request of the Chief of Engineers, including suitable areas determined by the Chief of Engineers to be required in the general public interest for initial and subsequent disposal of spoil, and also necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads, and embankments therefor or the costs of such retaining works; hold and save the United States free from damages that may result fiom the construction and maintenance of the project modification; provide and maintain berthing areas at the docks adjacent to the improvement with depth commensurate with the adjacent Federal project depth; accomplish at no cost to the United States all relocations and alterations of utilities necessary for the project; and assume full responsibility for all project first costs in excess of the Federal cost limitation of $500,000. Terminal facilities. Three car-ferry slips, a grain elevator, one shipbuilding yard, and three other wharves used for handling coal, building materials, cement, and miscellaneous commodities. While these facilities are considered fairly adequate for existing commerce, it is believed the City should provide a suitable wharf with warehouse and railway connection open to the general public. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design was completed for construction of a small boat harbor at a cost of $102,251. A contract in the amount of $2,451,546 was awarded late in the fiscal year. No work was performed on this contract. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspection and reports were performed at a cost of $47,381. Riprap of south breakwater and repair of north stub entrance pier was performed at a cost of $83,359. The U.S. Hopper Dredge Hains performed maintenance dredging removing 42,366 cubic yards, bin measure, of shoal material at a cost of $116,470. Maintenance of the disposal area was performed at a cost of $32,140. Engineering, design, surveys, supervision and administration cost $36,632. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project is completed except for the 1962 and 1968 modifications. The 1962 modification is inactive. Work on the 1968 modification has been postponed. The breakwater, completed in 1910, is in generally fair condition. Dredging a channel through outer basin to existing project depth and removal of a portion of old north stub pier at the river entrance were completed in December 1937. Dredging river channel was completed in July 1942. Costs of existing project is $774,725 for new work and $6,004,274 for maintenance, a total of $6,778,999. 43. MENOMINEE HARBOR AND RIVER, MICH. AND WIS. Location. On west shore of Green Bay, about 49 miles northeast of Green Bay Harbor, and about 155 miles from Milwaukee via Sturgeon Bay Canal. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14917.) Previous projects. See page 1361 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. See Chicago District Annual Report 1979, Table 30-C, page 30-26. For detailed description see page 1214, Annual Report for 1963. The portion authorized by 1960 River and Harbor Act is inactive and estimated (1964) at $442,000, Federal, and $105,000 non-Federal. Costs of completed new work exclusive of inacive work and amount expended on previous projects are $221,053 Federal and $50,762 non-Federal, which includes a cash contribution of $36,762. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for complete work. Terminal facilities. There are 9 wharves for handling coal, limestone, pulp and miscellaneous commodities. City of Marinette provided a public wharf. Facilities are considered fairly adequate for existing commerce, except that there is need for a public wharf owned by City of Menominee, with warehouse and railway connection. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, miscellaneous inspections and services were performed by hired labor at a cost of $24,850. Engineering and design for confined disposal area for polluted dredge spoil was continued at a cost of $60,076. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project in effect prior to the modification of March 2, 1945 was completed in 1938. 31-23 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 No additional work was necessary under the modification of March 2, 1945 to provide a depth of 12 feet in the extension of the channel to the vicinity of the Marinette Yacht Club as project depth or more was available. The entrance piers were completed in 1884, and were rehabilitated (1954-1964) and are in excellent condition. Dredging of the channel below the Marinette municipal wharf, together with enlarging the turning basin to existing project depth, was commenced in May 1938. The north pier is maintained for a length of about 1,202 feet. Modification of the project authorized by the 1960 River and Harbor Act is inactive. Construction for the 1967 Modification was started August 17, 1968 and completed in October 1968. The costs of the existing project were $221,053 for new work, $1,746,537 for maintenance and $1,351,852 for rehabilitation, a total of $3,319,442. 44. MILWAUKEE HARBOR, WIS. Location. On west shore of Lake Michigan about 85 miles north of Chicago and about 83 miles west of Grand Haven, Mich. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14924.) Previous projects. See page 1385 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. See Chicago District Annual Report for 1979, Table 30-C, page 30-26. For detailed description see page 1232 of Annual Report for 1963. Completed new work costs are $6,937,804, Federal and $478,000, non-Federal, exclusive of amount expended on previous projects. The uncompleted portion of the 1935 River and Harbor Act was placed in the inactive category in June 1973. Estimated costs are $119,000 (July 1972) Federal and $1,170,000 (July 1972) non-Federal for this portion. Uncompleted portion of 1945 River and Harbor Act was deauthorized in 1977. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Complied with for Acts of March 2, 1945, October 23, 1962, and July 14, 1960, except inactive portion of 1945 Act. Act of August 30, 1935, provided that original dredging of outer harbor area be done by City of Milwaukee and City of Milwaukee be reimbursed at actual cost but not to exceed 10 cents per cubic yard, place measurement, for original dredging done subsequent to authorization of work by Congress. Agreement covering dredging was executed by Secretary of War, February 23, 1934, after this work was originally authorized as part of public works program. City was reimbursed for 10 percent of dredging. Terminal facilities. Four car-ferry slips, and 57 other wharves, private and municipal, used for handling coal, grain, building materials, cement, petroleum products, and miscellaneous commodities. As facilities in inner harbor were inadequate for existing commerce, Milwaukee Harbor Commission has constructed nine docks in the outer harbor for handling general cargo. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $67,350. Repair of the north breakwater was performed at a cost of $178,093. Settlement of claim on contract completed in FY 79 for repair to the north shore connector and north breakwater was accomplished at a cost of $507,005. A contract was awarded for maintenance dredging in the amount of $1,125,080. The contract is approximately 47 percent complete at a cost of $593,895. Approximately 92,500 cubic yards, place measure, of shoal material was removed. Engineering, design, surveys, supervision and administration cost $98,938. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project is complete except for inactive portions. The 1962 modification was completed in July 1967. North breakwater and shore connection 9,954 feet long, was completed in August 1925. North pier was completed in 1905 and construction of south pier was completed in November 1910. Construction of south breakwater and shore connection was completed in October 1929. Before modification of August 30, 1935, City of Milwaukee also dredged most of the area in the outer harbor south of inner entrance piers and lakeward of pierhead line to more than 21 feet below datum without cost to the United States. City of Milwaukee also dredged a portion of the area of the outer harbor north of inner entrance piers to provide an approach channel to the passenger and auto pier opposite East Claybourn Street. Work on the 1945 modification was completed in August 1957, except for inactive portion which consists of dredging the Milwaukee River from Buffalo Street to upper limit of the project at Humbolt Avenue. Northerly 3,000 feet of north breakwater and the shore condition are in poor condition. The remainder of north breakwater is in generally good condition. South breakwater and shore connections are in generally good condition. Costs of existing project were $6,937,804 for new work, $27,229,117 for maintenance, and $1,891,810 for rehabilitation, a total of $36,058,791. 45. MONROE HARBOR, MICH. 31-24 -- DETROIT, MICH., DISTRICT Location. On lower reach of Raisin River, which empties into Lake Erie and is 36 miles south of Detroit, Michigan. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14830.) Existing project. Provides for a channel in Lake Erie and Raisin River to City of Monroe, for a turning basin, and for riprapping protecting dikes at river mouth. Project depths are 21 feet to turning basin, 18 feet in turning basin, and 9 feet to upstream end of project. For additional details see page 1490 of Annual Report for 1962. Project feature for riprapping protecting dikes is considered inactive. Estimated costs of this feature (1954) is $90,000. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Several privately owned docks and a municipal terminal. Port of Monroe Authority built a steel and concrete wharf on southeast side of turning basin for commercial use. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $27,657. The U.S Hopper Dredge Hains performed maintenance dredging removing 157,539 cubic yards, bin measure, of shoal material at a cost of $405,704. Operation of the booster pump cost $21,145. Maintenance of disposal area was performed at a cost of $107,622. An adjustment of $-56,400 was made in cost for maintenance dredging performed last fiscal year with the Hoffman. Engineering, design, surveys, layouts, supervision and administration cost $16,466. Engineering and design for confined disposal area for polluted dredging was continued at a cost of $326,309. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was completed in 1936, except for riprapping protective dikes on each side of the Bay Channel. Due to combined effect of severe storms and continued high water, dikes have largely disappeared. Total costs to end of fiscal year were $9,090,773 of which $987,340 was for new work (including $300,000 contributed by the Port Commission of Monroe, and $8,103,433 for maintenance including $166,667 contributed funds, $125,000 by Consolidated Paper Company and $41,667 by River Raisin Company.) 46. MUSKEGON HARBOR, MICH. Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 114 miles northeasterly from Chicago, Ill., and 80 miles easterly from Milwaukee, Wis. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14934.) Previous project. For details see page 1950 of Annual Report for 1915; page 1399, Annual Report for 1924; and page 1484, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. A breakwater protected outer basin in Lake Michigan and an entrance channel from Lake Michigan to Muskegon Lake protected by piers and revetments. Project depths vary from 29 feet in the lakeward portion of the outer basin to 27 feet in the channel between the inner piers to Muskegon Lake. For additional details see page 1303 of Annual Report for 1963. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Several privately owned wharves primarily for commercial use. Details on actual port and harbor facilities are in Port Series, No. 48 (revised 1961) prepared and published as part 2 by Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors. Information on port terminal services and charges, and steamship services is prepared and published as part I by the Port Development Staff, U.S. Department of Commerce. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, operation of safety features, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $36,579. Riprap of north and south breakwaters was performed at a cost of $47,203. Engineering and design for repair of south revetment was performed at a cost of $67,422. Engineering, design, layouts, supervision and administration cost $21,631. An adjustment of $-115,000 was made in cost for maintenance of shore erosion mitigation under Section 111 performed last fiscal year. Condition at end offiscal year. Existing project, including latest project modification, was completed in 1965. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1465 of Annual Report for 1962. Total costs to end of fiscal year were $10,094,594 of which $2,403,702 was for new work, $3,818,766 for maintenance and $3,872,126 for rehabilitation. 47. NEW BUFFALO HARBOR, MICH. Location. At mouth of Galien River on southeast shore of 31-25 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 Lake Michigan in Berrien County, about 45 miles easterly from Chicago, Ill. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14905.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Existing project. Provides for an entrance channel 10 feet deep by 80 feet wide and 850 feet long, to mouth of Galien River; new north and south breakwaters 1,305 and 740 feet long, respectively, and deepening inner channel to Galien River to 8 feet and 80 feet wide and 1,250 feet long. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Terminal facilities. One village owned boat ramp and three privately operated marinas and a private boat club facility. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $19,012. The contract awarded last fiscal year for furnishing and placing sand was completed at a cost of $784,675. Approximately 196,000 tons of sand was placed. Supply and rental contracts were awarded at a cost of $435,837 and 148,500 tons of sand was placed. An adjustment of $-83,666 was made in hired labor cost for beach nourishment performed last fiscal year. Engineering, design, layouts, supervision and administration cost $47,974. Engineering and design for confined disposal area for polluted dredge was continued at a cost of $97,845. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project is complete. Total costs at end of fiscal year were $3,091,830 of which $1,285,716 was for new work and $1,806,114 for maintenance, federal funds, and contributed funds in the amount of $1,186,- 467. 48. ONTONAGON HARBOR, MICH. Location. On south shore of Lake Superior. It consists of improvement of mouth of Ontonagon River. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14965.) Previous project. For details see page 1931 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1406 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Provides for approach channel 16 feet deep, a channel between piers with 17 and 15-foot depths, an inner basin 12 feet deep, and maintenance of channels, basin, and entrance piers. Completed project cost $19,619. See page 1100 of Annual Report for 1966 for details. A modification authorized by 1962 River and Harbor Act provides for increasing depths of channels, construction of an inner basin and a sedimentation basin. This portion of project is inactive. (Estimated cost (1965) of this work is $6,040,000. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required for earlier authorization. See page 1020 of Annual Report for 1965 requirements of 1962 Act. Terminal facilities. There are no publicly owned wharves. There are three coal wharves, an oil receiving facility, and a few small fish wharves. Terminal facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed at a cost of $19,408. A contract awarded last fiscal year for maintenance dredging was completed, 23,245 cubic yards of material was removed at a cost of $129,061. A contract was awarded and completed this fiscal year. Approximately 109,114 cubic yards of material was removed by a hydraulic dredge and crane barge, at a cost of $513,824. Engineering, design, surveys, supervision and administration cost $62,405. Engineering and design for confined disposal area was continued at a cost of $15,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. All work authorized under previous acts was completed in 1938. Work autorized under the 1962 Act is is an inactive status. Total costs to end of fiscal year for existing project were $5,104,012 of which $112,101 was for new work and $4,991,911 for maintenance. 49. PENTWATER HARBOR, MICH. Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan 146 miles northeasterly from Chicago, Ill., and 14 miles southerly from Ludington, Mich. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14907.) Existing project. Provides for widening old entrance channel to 150 feet between parallel piers and revetments, channel to extend from Lake Michigan to Pentwater Lake, with a depth of 16 feet. Piers and revetments are built of stonefilled timber cribs and piling and capped with concrete. The 200-foot extension to south pier portion of project is considered inactive. Estimated cost (1954) of this portion is $65,100. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. 31-26 DETROIT, MICH., DISTRICT Terminal facilities. Several small privately owned wharves on west end of Pentwater Lake. The City and Michigan Waterways Commission jointly constructed a dock on northwest side of Pentwater Lake for public use. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Condition surveys, operation of safety features, miscellaneous inspections and services were performed at a cost of $5,878. Repair to navigation structures were performed by Government forces -at a cost of $22,566. An adjustment of $-4,209 was made in cost for contract dredging completed last fiscal year. A contract was awarded and completed for maintenance dredging at a cost of $57,500. Approximately 19,145 cubic yards, place measure, of shoal material was removed by hydraulic dredge. Engineering, surveys, supervision and administration cost $12,284. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was completed in 1959 except for a 200-foot extension to the south pier which is not considered necessary under present conditions. For additional details see page 1468 of Annual Report for 1962. Total costs for existing project at end of fiscal year were $2,525,917 of which $179,899 was for new work, and $2,346,018 for maintenance. 50. POINT LOOKOUT HARBOR (AU GRES RIVER), MICH. Location. At Au Gres River on westerly shore of Lake Huron at entrance to Saginaw Bay, about 17 miles northeast of mouth of Saginaw River. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14863.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a small boat harbor having a 12-foot deep, 100-foot wide, 2,800-foot long outer entrance channel; a 5,600-foot long, 100-foot wide inner entrance channel having a 10-foot depth; an 8,270-foot long 6-foot deep river channel ending just downstream from U.S. 23 highway bridge and having a width of 60 feet; a 4,000-foot long north breakwater and a 3,800-foot long south breakwater. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Small boat marina facilities are under construction by State of Michigan. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies performed by Government forces at a cost of $7,210. The design deficiency study was continued at a cost of $269. Engineering for dredging cost $718. Engineering and design on confined disposal area for polluted dredged material was continued at a cost of $372. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was completed during fiscal year 1974. Total costs to end of fiscal year were $2,978,032 of which $2,642,584 was for new work and $335,447 for maintenance. An analysis for the Design Deficiency Report was continued. 51. PORTAGE LAKE HARBOR, MICH. Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan about 186 miles northeasterly from Chicago and about 37 miles northerly from Ludington. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14939.) Existing project. Provides for a harbor of refuge with an entrance channel from Lake Michigan to Portage Lake protected by piers and revetments. Project depth is 18 feet. For additional details see page 1297 of Annual Report for 1958. Latest published map is in House Document 588, 64th Congress, 1st session. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperatin. None required. Terminal facilities. There are landing places and marinas at inner end of Portage Lake. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, miscellaneous inspections and services were performed at a cost of $7,667. Repair to navigation structures were performed by Government forces at a cost of $123,810. An adjustment of $2,701 was made in contract dredging cost for contract completed last fiscal year. A contract was awarded and completed for maintenance dredging at a cost of $49,500. Approximately 8,209 cubic yards, place measure, of shoal material was removed by hydraulic dredge. Engineering, layouts, surveys, supervision and administration cost $11,134. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was substantially completed in 1912. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1298 of Annual Report for 1958. The structures are generally in fair condition. 31-27 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 52. PORT SANILAC HARBOR, MICH. Location. On southwest shore of Lake Huron, 30 miles north of Port Huron, Mich. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14862.) Existing project. Provides for a harbor of refuge protected by breakwater structures extending to 12-foot depth contour in lake; for dredging a harbor basin 10 feet deep; for dredging an entrance channel 12 feet deep; a 70-foot extension of the south breakwater; a 300-foot arm added to the north breakwater; and riprap placed at the lakeward side of the breakwater additions. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There is one privately owned dock used principally as a fishing terminal by owner and a municipally owned pier for recreational craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed at a cost of $7,667. Six culverts were installed to improve circulation within the harbor at a cost of $13,561. Engineering, real estate, supervision and administration cost $5,368. The contract awarded last fiscal year for placing sand under Section 111 was completed. Approximately 41,000 tons of sand was placed at a cost of $109,880. Engineering, surveys, layouts, supervision and administration cost $10,161. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was completed in 1951 except for latest project modification which was completed in FY 76. Breakwaters are in good condition. 53. PORT WASHINGTON HARBOR, WIS. Location. On the west shore of Lake Michigan, about 53 miles south of Manitowoc and about 29 miles north of Milwaukee. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14904.) Previous project. For details, see page 1938 of Annual Report for 1915, page 1459 of Annual Report for 1938, and page 30-14 of Annual Report for 1975. Existing project. See Chicago District Annual Report for 1979, Table 30-C, page 30-27. Construction of a small boat harbor within the existing harbor was authorized by the Chief of Engineers, 12 June 1975, under authority of Section 107, 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There is one coal wharf, a petroleum tank farm and several fishing wharves. City provided a wharf which is open to public use. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: The contract for construction of a small boat harbor was completed at a total cost of $2,463,351 of which $1,375,913 was contributed funds. Maintenance: Condition surveys, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed at a cost of $16,727. Repairs to the north breakwater were accomplished by contract at a cost of $32,567. Dredging was performed by contract at a cost of $259,999. Engineering, design, supervision and administration cost $27,065. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was completed in 1936. The 1958 modification was deauthorized in 1977. Total costs to end of fiscal year were $5,393,379 of which $3,768,816 was for new work, $2,124,563 for maintenance. 54. PRESQUE ISLE HARBOR, MICH. Location. On south shore of Lake Superior within City limits of Marquette Harbor. It is an indentation about 1.5 miles long and one-half mile wide in shore behind Presque Isle Point. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14970.) Existing project. A breakwater off Presque Isle Point and dredging harbor to depth of 28 feet an inner portion with 30 feet at entrance. For details see page 1021 of 1965 Annual Report. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. One merchandise and petroleum receiving wharf and one ore dock. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, miscellaneous inspections and reports 31-28 DETROIT, MICH., DISTRICT were performed by government forces at a cost of $10,849. Engineering and design was initiated on a confined disposal facility at a cost of $5,470. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project authorized by earlier Acts was completed in 1939. A contract for harbor deepening authorized by 1960 Act was completed in April 1962 except for a section where rocks were encountered in southeast portion of harbor. Rock removal has been accomplished intermittently by hired labor and the project is completed. Breakwater is in good condition. A reconnaissance report was completed in November 1970 concerning erosion of the beach north of Picnic Rocks and a detailed project report is being prepared. 65. RACINE HARBOR, WIS. Location. On west shore of Lake Michigan about 26 miles south of Milwaukee and about 64 miles north of Chicago. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14925.) Previous project. See page 1389 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. See Chicago District Annual Report for 1979, Table 30-C, page 30-27. For detailed description see page 1235, Annual Report for 1963. New work for project as completed cost $777,775, exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects and exclusive of inner 300 linear feet of pile pier and 450 linear feet of rubblemound originally part of south breakwater but no longer considered necessary. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Construction of a small boat harbor within the existing harbor was authorized by the Chief of Engineers, 26 June 1979 under authority of Section 107, 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Five wharves used for handling coal, limestone, petroleum products, and fish. City provided a public wharf. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering plans and specifications for the Siena Center project at Racine was completed at a cost of $34,400. Maintenance: Condition surveys, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by government forces at a cost of $18,741. Riprap stone was placed along the south breakwater at a cost of $234,520. Engineering, design, supervision and administration was performed at a cost of $7,051. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project substantially completed in 1946. Construction of north breakwater and shore connection was completed in November 1918. Removal of old north pier was completed in 1913. Construction of south breakwater and shore connection and removal of old south pier were commenced in June 1916 and completed in December 1924. Removal of outer shoals, widening and deepening channel through outer basin to existing project depth and width, and dredging river channel began in July and completed in November 1946. Concrete superstructure on portions of north breakwater and shore connections and timber substructures of portions of north and south breakwaters and south stub pier are disintegrating and are being repaired. 56. ROUGE RIVER, MICH. Location. Rises in Oakland and Washtenaw Counties, Mich., 30 miles long, flows southeasterly through Wayne County, and joins Detroit River at westerly limit of City of Detroit. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14854.) Previous project. For details see page 1530 of Annual Report for 1932, and page 1558 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Provides for: (a) Main channel from Detroit River through Short Cut Canal extending to upstream limit of the project, a distance of 3.5 miles. Project depths are 25 and 21 feet in navigation channel, 21 feet in turning basin, and 13 feet in upper reach of project. (b) Old channel from Detroit River extending to junction of Old Channel with Short Cut Canal. Project depths are 25, 18, 17, and 21 feet. For additional details see page 1324 of Annual Report for 1963. In 1973, work authorized by the 1962 River and Harbor Act was reclassified from the active to inactive category. Estimated cost (1972) of this work is $880,000. Except for dredging 25-foot channel 1,150 feet upstream from mouth of Old Channel, work authorized in Act of August 30, 1935, is considered inactive. Estimated cost (1958) of inactive portion is $255,000. Work authorized by Act of July 3, 1958 is considered inactive. Estimated cost (1960) of this work is $210,000. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Act of October 23, 1962, requires local interests to provide lands and rights-of-way for construction upon request of the Chief of Engineers; hold the United States 81Y29 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 free from damages; provide terminal facilities to accommodate prospective commerce considered in report of District Engineer; dredge and maintain areas between the Federal improvement and terminal facilities to depths commensurate with improved Federal channel; make alterations in docks, bulkheads and other structures, and take such other measures as may be necessary to assure stability of banks adjacent to channel; and provide bridge protection. The assurances of local cooperation for the River and Harbor Act of 1962 were furnished by the Michigan State Waterways Commission and accepted on January 7, 1965. Fulfillment of all items of local cooperation has not been accomplished. Terminal facilities. Numerous large commercial docks for handling various type cargo. Details on actual port and harbor facilities are contained in the Port Series No. 45 (revised 1961) prepared and published as Part 2 by the Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors. Information on port administration and Federal services, port steamship services is prepared and published as Part 1 by the Port Development Staff, U.S. Department of Commerce. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $51,018. The U.S. Hopper Dredge Hoffman performed maintenance dredging removing 115,549 cubic yards, bin measure, of shoal material at a cost of $496,289. This cost is exclusive of financial participation in cost of dredging by industry (obtained as a result of studies on illegal deposits of industrial waste) in the amount of $63,060. Operation of the booster pump cost $32,818. Maintenance of the disposal area cost $51,206. Engineering, design, surveys, supervision and administration cost $24,111. Settlement of claim was made in the amount of $1,473,360 on contract for construction of Phase I diked disposal area. The contract for construction of Phase II is approximately 95 percent complete. Cost this fiscal year was $1,354,666. Engineering, supervision and administration cost $204,879. Condition at end of fiscal year. Work authorized before 1962 modification is complete or deauthorized. For additional details on completion of existing project see Annual Report for 1962. Total costs for existing project to end of fiscal year were $27,204,509 of which $675,251 was for new work and $26,529,258 for maintenance. In addition, $29,563 was expended for new work from Emergency Relief Act Funds. 57. SAGINAW RIVER, MICH. Location. Formed by union of Tittabawassee and Shiawassee Rivers, 22 miles long, and flows northerly into extreme inner end of Saginaw Bay, Lake Huron. Cities of Saginaw and Bay City are on the river. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14867.) Previous project. For details, see page 1957 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1550 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Provides for an entrance channel 27 feet deep and 350 feet wide from 27-foot contour in Saginaw Bay to river mouth; thence a channel 26 feet deep and 200 feet wide to New York Central Railroad Bridge at Bay City; thence 22 feet deep and 200 feet wide to C&O Railroad Bridge in Saginaw; thence 16.5 feet deep and 200 feet wide to upstream limit at Green Point. Project also provides for five turning basins; one 25 feet deep at Essexville, 600 feet wide with a maximum length of 1,850 feet; one 22 feet deep on east side of channel about 1 mile upstream from Cass Avenue in Bay City, 650 feet wide and 1,000 feet long; one 20 feet deep at Carrollton, 100 to 300 feet wide and 900 feet long; one 20 feet deep just downstream from C&O Bridge in Saginaw, 650 feet wide and 1,000 feet long; and one 15 feet deep between Bristol Street Bridge and New York Central Railroad Bridge in Saginaw. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Numerous large commercial docks for handling a great variety of cargo. Details on actual port and harbor facilities are in Port Series No. 45 (revised 1961) prepared and published as Part 2 by Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors. Information on port administration and Federal services, port and terminal services and charges, and steamship services is prepared and published as Part 1 by Port Development Staff, U.S. Department of Commerce. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, Hi-Fix surveys, support of Water Central Center, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed at a cost of $309,940. The U.S. Hopper Dredges, Hains, Markham, Lyman and Hoffman performed maintenance dredging removing 48,229, 425,410, 78,987 and 56,104 cubic yards bin measure of shoal material at a cost of $362,879, $891,263, $329,999 and $204,000, respectively. Maintenanceof the disposal area was performed at a cost of $94,263. Engineering, design, surveys, layouts, supervision and administration cost $204,562. Settlement of a claim was made in the amount of $2,681,191 on contract for 31-30 DETROIT, MICH., DISTRICT construction of diked disposal area awarded in 1976. Engineering and design was accomplished for construction of a disposal area for upper Saginaw River and repair to existing disposal area. Engineering, design, supervision and administration cost $88,986. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project is complete, except for a small part of the work authorized by the Act of October 23, 1962. Section D (Sixth Street Turning Basin) of the 1962 Act is complete except for the channel portion, which is pending modification. Total costs for existing project to the end of fiscal year were $50,979,809 of which $13,954,660 was for new work and $37,025,149 was for maintenance. 58. ST. CLAIR RIVER, MICH. Location. A 40 mile long section of Great Lakes connecting channels which flows southerly from Lake Huron and discharges into Lake St. Clair. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14852.) Existing project. Provides for channels through St. Clair River, which, at low water datum, are suitable for vessels drawing 25.5 feet. Project also provides for improvement of North Channel outlet, 100 feet wide and 10 feet deep, for recreational craft. Project depths are referred to low water datums for Lakes Huron and St. Clair, 576.8 and 571.7 feet above mean water level at Father Point, Quebec; International Great Lakes Datum 1955. (See Table 31-B and 31-C for authorizing legislation and features of existing project.) Act of 24 July 1946 provides for widening and deepening of southeast bend and improvement of outlet of north channel. Estimated cost (1971) is $600,000. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. This improvement serves through commerce between upper and lower Great Lakes, and has not materially influenced terminal facilities along its route. A number of privately owned piers and wharves are at Port Huron, Marysville, St. Clair, and Marine City, Mich., which handle coal, limestone, petroleum products, woodpulp, salt and general cargo. These installations satisfy present commerce requirements. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, support of North Central Division Water Control Center and miscellaneous inspection and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $142,213. The U.S. Hopper Dredge Hains performed maintenance dredging removing 27,696 cubic yards, bin measure of shoal material at a cost of $166,409. Maintenance of disposal area at Harsens Island was performed at a cost of $17,544. Engineering, surveys, supervision and administration cost $24,817. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project is complete. Total cost of existing project to end of fiscal year was $27,800,518 of which $19,213,246 was for new work and $8,587,272 for maintenance. 59. ST. JOSEPH RIVER, MICH. Location. St. Joseph River rises near Hillsdale, Mich., flows southwestward into Indiana, thence, northwest, and empties into Lake Michigan at St. Joseph. The length is about 14 miles following the general course and not including small bends. It has a drainage area of 4,586 square miles. Its discharge in cubic feet per second varies from about 300 to 21,600, with a average of about 3,000. High water occurs in spring, with a rise of from 4 to 6 feet, and low water in summer. It is a crooked stream with rapid current and numerous shoal crossings 24 to 30 inches deep, with intervening pools from 4 to 8 feet deep. The average width below Berrien Springs is from 300 to 400.feet. The navigable part extends from the mouth to the dam at Berrien Springs, a distance of about 22 miles by river, with a drop at low water of 17 feet from Berrien Springs to Lake Michigan. (See U.S. Lake Survey Chart No. 7.) Existing project. This provides for a channel 2 to 3 feet deep at low water and from 30 to 50 feet wide from the mouth to Berrien Springs, a distance of about 22 miles, by building wing dams, making cuts through the shoals, and removing snags. Fluctuations in water surface due to floods vary from about 4 to 6 feet above low water. Loeal cooperation. None. Terminal facilities. None, except as use is made of St. Joseph Harbor. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, operation of safety features, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed at a cost of $39,459. Placement of riprap stone along the north and south breakwater cost $45,851. The U.S. Hopper Dredge Hains performed maintenance dredging removing 64,110 cubic yards, bin measure, of shoal material at a cost of $262,083. Maintenance of disposal area was performed at a cost of $1,541. Engineering, design, surveys, supervision and administration of all above work cost $16,964. An adjustment of $-45,000 was made in cost for maintenance 31-31 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 of shore erosion mitigation under Section 111 performed last fiscal year. Engineering and design for confined disposal area for polluted dredged material was continued at a cost of $80,761. Site selection for the disposal area has been completed. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was completed in 1956. The structures are in generally good condition. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1454 of Annual Report for 1962. Total costs of existing project to end of fiscal year were $9,904,646 of which $1,301,373 was for new work, $7,641,057 for maintenance and $962,216 for rehabilitation. 60. ST. MARYS RIVER, MICH. Location. A Great Lakes connecting channel about 63 miles long, flows southeasterly between State of Michigan and Province of Ontario, Canada, from eastern end of Lake Superior into northern end of Lake Huron. (See NOAA Nautical Charts 14882, 14883, and 14884.) At Sault Ste. Marie, Mich., about 14 miles downstream from Lake Superior, there are four parallel locks and a hydroelectric powerplant. Previous project. For details see page 1955, Annual Report for 1915; and page 1529, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Channels permitting 25.5-foot draft navigation in St. Marys River and Lake Superior and Lake Huron approaches thereto; constructing and operating four locks and two canals; constructing an electric plant of 14,000 kilowatt capacity (45,000 kilowatt ultimate capacity) constructing anchorage areas in river above and below locks; and constructing various other works in conjunction with project. Original State locks were operated and maintained under permanent indefinite appropriation from June 9, 1881, to November 2, 1886, after which they were destroyed by excavation for the Poe Lock in 1896. Weitzel Lock, destroyed in 1942 by excavation for MacArthur Lock, was operated and maintained under the same appropriation from September 1, 1881, to June 30, 1935. Poe Lock was operated and maintained under the same appropriation from August 3, 1896, Davis Lock from October 21, 1914, and Sabin Lock from September 18, 1919, to end of fiscal year 1935. Poe Lock in 1962. Details of existing project are set forth in Table 31-D. Project depths are referred to low water datum corresponding to sloping surface of river as follows: Above locks: When water surface of Lake Superior is at elevation 600 feet and at upstream side of locks is 577.8 feet above mean water level at Father Point, Quebec (International Great Lakes Datum 1955). Estimated (1973) cost for new work is $164,630. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. This improvement serves through commerce between Lake Superior and lower lakes and has not materially influenced terminal facilities at localities along its route. Three piers at Sault Ste. Marie receive coal and petroleum products. Limestone is shipped from a pier at Drummond Island. Vessel refueling stations are at Lime Island and Village of Detour; they receive coal and petroleum products. Present terminals satisfy current traffic requirements. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation, maintenance and care of locks: Two canals and four locks were operated as required. Necessary repairs and improvements were made thereto and to appurtenance structures and equipment. Canal was open to navigation 283 days from 1 October 1980 through 30 September 1981. During that period, a total of 11,100 vessels, aggregating 96,844,809 short tons of freight and 174,305 passengers passed through the MacArthur, Poe, Davis and Sabin locks. Cost for operation, maintenance and care of the locks for the fiscal year was $4,165,312, which included $132,285 for extended season operation and maintenance. Powerhouse and equipment: Two hydroelectric powerhouses were operated and maintained. Cost that was done by hired labor during the fiscal year was $510,815 less a deduction of $23,518 for interdepartmental electricity sold. Other operation and care items: Buildings and grounds were maintained, condition surveys, operation and environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed at a cost of $1,533,830. Security measures were performed by contract at a cost of $161,513. A ice boom was installed and removed at a cost of $57,274. An engineering study on the compensating works was performed at a cost of $33,309. Channels and canals: St. Marys River channels and canal approaches were examined by sweeping. Removal of shoals in St. Marys River channels and canal approaches was accomplished by hired labor and U.S. Derrickboats Nicolet and Harvey at a cost of $883,984, including engineering and design. Recreational facilities: Information center, comfort stations, park fountain, observation and overlook platforms, including engineering and design were operated and maintained at a cost of $162,491. A total of 700,131 visitors used the observation and overlook platforms and the information center during the fiscal year. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project in effect prior to modification of 21 March 1956 is complete and work authorized by 1956 modification to provide a safe draft of 15.5 feet for both upbound and downbound traffic is also complete. 31-32 DETROIT, MICH., DISTRICT Public Works Funds used for new work was $158,401; and Public Works Acceleration Funds used for maintenance was $118,000. Total costs to end of fiscal year were $160,135,124 for new work and $130,255,912 for maintenance, for a grand total of $284,473,192. 61. SAUGATUCK HARBOR AND KALAMAZOO RIVER, MICH. Location. Harbor is on east shore of Lake Michigan, 90 miles northeasterly from Chicago, Ill., and 22 miles northerly from South Haven, Mich. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14906.) Previous project. For details see page 1947 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1475 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Entrance channel protected by parallel piers at mouth of Kalamazoo River and a river channel to City of Saugatuck. Project depths: 16 feet in entrance channel, 14 feet in river channel. Additional details on page 1456, 1962 Annual Report. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. At Village of Saugatuck there are several landing places for recreational craft and one for small commercial vessels. At Village of Douglas there is a landing pier. Facilities are considered adequate for present traffic. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $4,696. Repairs to south pier and inner revetment were performed at a cost of $59,755. Engineering, surveys, supervision and administration cost $5,960. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was completed in 1911. Total costs for existing project to end of fiscal year were $2,675,963 of which $364,527 was for new work and $2,311,436 for maintenance. 62. SAXON HARBOR, WIS. Location. On south shore of Lake Superior in Wisconsin at mouth of Oronto Creek, 27 miles southeast of harbor at Bayfield, Wis., and 21 miles westerly of harbor at Black River, Mich. It is also 99 miles east of Duluth-Superior Harbor and 60 miles west of Ontonagon Harbor, Mich. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14965.) Previous project. For details see page 1254 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. Provides for east and west breakwaters, an outer channel 10 feet deep, an inner basin and side channel 8 feet deep, and diversion of Oronto Creek to Parkers Creek by three short reaches of channel excavation and a levee. For detailed dimensions of features see page 1025 of Annual Report for 1965. Existing project was authorized by 1958 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 169, 85th Cong., 1st sess., contained latest published map.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. One wharf 300 feet long on east side of present harbor basin constructed by local interests. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $3,810. A contract was awarded and completed for maintenance dredging. Approximately 7,700 cubic yards, place measure, of shoal material was removed by hydraulic dredge at a cost of $39,717. Engineering, surveys, supervision and administration cost $10,472. Condition at end of fiscal year. Harbor improvements were completed in November 1965 except for minor work. The project was fully completed in March 1968. Controlling depths are 9 feet in lake approach, 9 feet in channel between piers, and 7 feet in inner basin and side channel. A reconnaissance report was completed in August 1971 concerning erosion of the shoreline west of the harbor. A detailed project report is being prepared to develop an acceptable plan for mitigation measures. 63. SEBEWAING RIVER, MICH. Location. At mouth of Sebewaing River on south shore of Saginaw Bay about 10 miles south of Bay Port, Mich. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14863.) Previous project. For details see page 1007 of Annual Report for 1912. Existing project. Provides for an entrance channel 8 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and about 15,000 feet long in Saginaw 31-33 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 Bay. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Existing project. Provides for an entrance channel 8 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and about 15,000 feet long in Saginaw Bay. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Terminal facilities. A number of small wharves used by fishing vessels and other light-draft craft are along the river. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed at a cost of $2,537. Maintenance of disposal area was performed at a cost of $1,800. The contract awarded last fiscal year for maintenance dredging was completed. "Approximately 43,762 cubic yards of shoal material was removed at a cost of $145,382. Engineering, design, supervision and administration cost $15,969. An adjustment of $- 161 was made in diked disposal cost. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was completed in 1903. Total costs to end of fiscal year were $2,283,126 of which $35,573 was for new work and $2,247,553 for maintenance. 64. SHEBOYGAN HARBOR, WIS. Location. On west shore of Lake Michigan about 26 miles south of Manitowoc and about 55 miles north of Milwaukee. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14922.) Previous project. See page 1381 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. See Chicago District Annual Report for 1979, Table 30-C, page 30-27. For detailed description see page 1230, Annual Report for 1963. New work for project as completed cost $648,271, exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Three wharves for handling coal, petroleum products and miscellaneous commodities. City provided a public wharf. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed at a cost of $19,902. Minor repairs were made to navigation structures at a cost of $6,190. A rental contract was awarded for maintenance dredging. The contract is approximately 50 percent complete at a cost of $158,756. Approximately 13,700 cubic yards of shoal material was removed. Engineering, design, surveys, layouts, supervision and administration cost $23,894. Engineering and design of confined disposal area for polluted dredge material was continued at a cost of $24,985. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was completed in 1904. Construction of north breakwater was commenced in October 1913 and completed in October 1915. Dredging turning basin was commenced in October 1928 and completed in September 1931. Dredging entrance channel to existing project depth was commenced in June and completed in July 1938. Work on 1954 modification was completed in December 1956. Piers and breakwaters are in generally good condition. Inner 260 feet of south pier replaced with a revetment by private interests under permit granted July 16, 1931, by the Secretary of War. Pier is therefore maintained only for a length of about 2,490 feet. Sheboygan River is navigable about 2.4 miles above its mouth for craft drawing not more than 2 feet. Costs of existing project is $2,926,701 for maintenance and $609,028 for rehabilitation. 65. SOUTH HAVEN HARBOR, MICH. Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 77 miles northeasterly from Chicago, Ill., and 24 miles northerly from St. Joseph, Mich. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14906.) Previous project. For details see page 1947 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1473 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. An entrance channel protected by parallel piers and revetments at mouth of Black River, a river channel and a turning basin. Project depths are 21 feet in entrance channel and 19 feet in river channel and turning basin. For additional details see page 1455 of Annual Report for 1962. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Several wharves for handling coal, building materials, woodpulp, fish, and miscellaneous commodities will have warehouses. Facilities satisfy current commerce requirements. 31-34 DETROIT, MICH., DISTRICT Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, operation of safety features, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $10,350. Repairs to navigation structures were performed at a cost of $60,607. Supervision and administration cost $5,019. Under Section 111 P.L. 90-483 for shore erosion mitigation approximately 94,000 tons of sand was placed at a cost of $287,598. Engineering, surveys, layouts, supervision and administration cost $33,072. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was completed in 1960. Project now being maintained to 14 foot and 12 foot depths, respectively, in lieu of the 21 feet and 19 feet authorized, which is adequate for current usage. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1456 of Annual Report for 1962. Total costs for existing project to the end of fiscal year were $5,855,772 of which $797,193 was for new work, $3,096,503 for maintenance, and $1,632,076 for rehabilitation. 66. STURGEON BAY AND LAKE MICHIGAN SHIP CANAL, WIS. Location. On west shore of Lake Michigan about 52 miles northeast of Green Bay and about 128 miles north of Milwaukee. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14919.) Previous projects. See page 1373 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. See Chicago District Annual Report, Table 31-C, page 30-27. For detailed description, see page 1223, Annual Report for 1963. See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. As the canal and connecting channel is a through waterway, only terminal facilities are in City of Sturgeon Bay, 4 miles from west end of revetted portion of canal. These facilities consist of two wharves for handling coal, petroleum products and miscellaneous commodities and four shipbuilding yards. City of Sturgeon Bay provided a public wharf about 5 miles northwesterly from City of Sturgeon Bay. Two major shipyards are located in Sturgeon Bay where repair facilities are available including dry docks, marine railways and hoists. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $19,469. Structure repair and minor maintenance at the north breakwater were performed at a cost of $50,294. Supervision and inspection cost $3,230. Engineering and design for construction of confined disposal area for polluted dredge material was continued at a cost of" $2,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was completed in 1946. Breakwaters were completed in 1880, and canal revetments in 1903. Dredging and rock removal at east entrance to canal and dredging in west section of canal to existing project depth were commenced in May and completed in September 1940. Deepening and widening middle section of canal to existing project depth and width was commenced in May and completed in August 1942. Dredging turning basin was commenced in June and completed in July 1946. Breakwaters are in good condition. North revetment and section of south revetment have been rehabilitated and are in good condition. Remainder of south revetment is in fair to poor condition and required repair. Total cost of $7,826,164 existing project is $736,303 for new work, $6,204,956 for maintenance and $884,899 for rehabilitation, a total of $7,751,171. In addition, $235,940 was expended between April 25, 1893, and June 30, 1917, on operating and care of works of improvements under provision of permanent indefinite appropriations for such purposes. 67. TWO HARBORS, MINN. Location. Harbor is on north shore of Lake Superior, 27 miles northeasterly from Duluth, Minn. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14966.) Existing project. Narrowing natural entrance by construction of two breakwaters, 1,628 and 900 feet long, from eastern and western points of bay, respectively; and dredging a maneuvering area on north side of harbor to 28 and 30 feet deep. A walkway on east breakwater is provided for public recreational use. For details see page 1026 of Annual Report for 1965. Dredging to deepen areas along easterly and northerly edges of channel was completed in 1980. This portion of project was reclassified from the "inactive" to "active" category in 1973. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. A section 221 local cooperation agreement was entered into with the City of Two Harbors on 14 August 1978. 31-35 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 Terminal facilities. No publicly owned wharves. Three ore docks, tug wharf, an unused coal dock, and merchandise wharf are privately owned. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Administrative costs of $386 for review of claim for contracted dredging completed last fiscal year. Settlement of claim scheduled for early FY82. Maintenance: Condition survey and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $7,041. Condition at end of fiscal year. Work authorized prior to 1960 Act was completed in 1950. The timber superstructure of the east breakwater above low water depths badly deteriorated since its original construction in 1948 and severely damaged in a N.E. storm on December 12, 1968 has been repaired. A contract for replacing the timber superstructure with a concrete cap and repairing the public-use walkway was completed in 1972. Most of the authorized dredging was completed in 1962. Construction was completed in August 1980 for rock removal in areas along the easterly and northerly edges of the harbor. 68. TWO RIVERS HARBOR, WIS. Location. On west shore of Lake Michigan about 82 miles north of Milwaukee and about 101 miles from Green Bay via Sturgeon Bay Canal. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14903.) Previous projects. See page 1377, Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. See Chicago District Annual Report for 1979, Table 30-C, page 30-28. For detailed description see page 1226 of Annual Report for 1963. Completed project cost $147,463 exclusive of the amount expended on previous projects. The 1935 River and Harbor Act portion of project is considered inactive. Estimated cost of this portion (1954) is $14,000. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. A coal wharf and several fishing wharves. City provided a wharf for receipt of petroleum products and public use. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $8,417. An adjustment of $-30,329 was made in cost for repairs to the navigation structures performed last fiscal year. The contract for maintenance dredging awarded last fiscal year was completed at a cost of $1,318,420. An estimated 214,264 cubic yards of shoal material was removed by a mechanical type (dragline) dredge. Supervision and administration costs were $38,412. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project is complete except for inactive portion of project which consists of dredging a 10-foot width along each side of lakeward portion of entrance channel between the piers. This dredging was omitted to avoid removal of necessary riprap along entrance piers. Present width of channel is considered adequate for present and reasonably prospective commerce. South pier was completed in 1883 and is in generally good condition. North pier was completed in 1908. North revetment, completed in 1917, was rebuilt May to August 1962. Dredging entrance channel and inner basin to existing project depth was commenced in March and substantially completed in May 1937. Total costs of existing project were $147,463 for new work and $6,374,774 for maintenance, a total of $6,522,- 237. In addition, $58,057 was expended for minor rehabilitation. 69. WHITEFISH POINT HARBOR, MICH. Location. On south shore of Lake Superior 40 miles northwesterly from Sault Ste. Marie, Mich., and 53 miles easterly from Grand Marais, Mich. (See Great Lakes Chart 14962.) Existing project. Provides for a harbor of refuge protected by two breakwater structures and for dredging a harbor basin and entrance channel, 12 feet deep. The addition of a 270-foot wave absorbing breakwater inside the harbor was approved by the Chief of Engineers on August 17, 1967 to correct a design deficiency. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There is one privately owned fishing wharf and a small-boat pier and launching ramp built by the State of Michigan. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: 31-36 DETROIT, MICH., DISTRICT Condition surveys, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $6,972. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was completed in 1960. The interior breakwater and repairs to the shoal connection were accomplished by contract during fiscal year 1969. Remaining structures are in generally good condition. Total cost of existing project was $978,843 of which $771,639 was for new work and $207,204 was for maintenance. 70. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS See Table 31-F. 71. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS See Table 31-G. 72. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (preauthorization). Studies during the fiscal year were conducted for the following harbors: Ashland Harbor, Wisconsin $1,995, Bayfield Harbor, Wisconsin $32,278, Harrisville Harbor, Michigan $49,183, Huron River, Michigan $263, Manitowoc Harbor, Wisconsin $102,250, Racine Harbor, Wisconsin $5,020, Sheboygan Harbor, Wisconsin $2,149, Washburn, Wisconsin $3,474. BEACH EROSION CONTROL 73. AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS Beach erosion control projects are authorized at Berrien County Shore (St. Joseph) Michigan and the Shore of Manitowoc County, Wis. For last full report see Annual Report for 1963 (Berrien County). 74. EMERGENCY SHORE PROTECTION Authority for emergency streambank and shoreline protection of public works and non-profit public services. (Section 14 Flood Control Act of1946, as amended.) Preparation of plans and specifications was discontinued in FY 81 for emergency protection to the eroding shoreline of the Red Cedar River along the Riverview Cemetery and Sanitary Lift Station Properties, due to lack of funds. Total FY 81 expenditures were $235. Thunder Bay (Alpena, Michigan) -A contract awarded in FY 79 for emergency portection to the shorelne at the Alpena Home for the Elderly was completed during FY 80. An amendment report on the project was completed. Total FY 81 expenditures were $1,721. Differing site conditions caused design to be inadequate requiring additional Federal Funds to revise the construction. These funds are presently being acquired from Congress. New local assurances are required prior to further construction. 75. BEACH EROSION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Beach erosion activities pursuant to Section 103 of the 1962 River and Harbor Act. During the fiscal year studies were conducted for the following harbors: Ashland Harbor, Wisconsin $3,129, Escanaba, Michigan $40,037, Two Harbors, Minnesota $13,627. 76. Mitigation of Shore Damages pursuant to Section 111 of the River and Harbor Act of 1968. Studies during the fiscal year were conducted for the following harbors: Big Bay $7,476, Grand Haven -$60,000, Harrisville $3,813, Holland Harbor $6,325, Muskegon Harbor, Michigan $115,000, Port Sanilac, Michigan $120,141, South Haven Harbor, Michigan $320,669, St. Joseph Harbor, Michigan -$45,000. 77. RED RUN DRAIN-LOWER CLINTON RIVER, MICH. Location. The Clinton River basin has an area of 760 square miles and includes parts of Macomb, Oakland, St. Clair and Lapeer Counties in the Southeastern portion of the lower peninsula of Michigan. The project itself is located in the southeastern section of the basin. Existing project. Provides for abandonment of the upper 2 31-37 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 miles of the Red Run Drain in Oakland County and for enlarging and paving the Red Run Drain from Dequindre Road on the west downstream to the Main Branch, Clinton River, a distance of approximately 8% miles. Bottom widths of the channel would vary from 70 to 240 feet. The Main Branch, Clinton River would be widened, deepened and straightened for a distance of about 4% miles. The channel width would vary from 180 to 200 feet and adjacent lands would be maintained as a flood way with a width of 500 feet. The authorized plan provides for a rectangular concrete-lined channel below this point, varying in width from 180 to 210 feet, to the existing Clinton River Cut-Off Canal, a distance of about 2 miles. The Cut-Off Canal would consist of a rectangular channel with concrete bottom 210 feet wide and steel sheet pile walls in the upper 1% miles and a trapezoidal concrete-lined channel with a 170-foot bottom width and 75- foot wide benches placed on each bank over the lower mile of the Canal to Lake St. Clair. The authorized plan would provide protection for surrounding urban areas against rainfall and flood having a 1.0 percent chance of occurrence under anticipated urbanized basin conditions in the year 2000. The cost estimate for new work (Oct 1980) is $117,000,000 excluding $24,075,000 to be contributed by local interests. Estimate of cost to local interests (Oct 1980) is $41,500,000. Local cooperation. Prior to construction, local interests must furnish assurances satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army that they will: Provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, rights-of-way, utility relocations, and highway bridge alterations necessary for construction of the channel improvements; presently estimated at (Oct 1980) $8,235,000 for Red Run Drain and (Oct 1980) $30,875,000 for Lower Clinton River; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works; maintain and operate all the works after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army; contribute in cash a sum presently estimated at (Oct 1980) $23,050,000, which, together with items applicable to Red Run Drain to be furnished in above, would constitute 50 percent of all flood control costs for Red Run Drain; prevent or restrict development in the project area by providing easements or by establishing and enforcing flood plain regulations where such development would result in the increase of damageable property in the flood plain or would necessitate modifications, or reduce the efficiency of, the project; prevent encroachment on the project channels and ponding areas which would decrease the effectiveness of the improvements, and, if ponding areas and capacities are impaired, promptly provide substitute capacities to restore the effectiveness of the project channels by establishing and enforcing water quality standards commensurate with Federal, State, and local standards; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction and operation of any pollution abate ment structures constructed by local interests on Red Run Drain in Oakland County; to bring the non-Federal share of costs to at least 50 percent of the total costs of recreation development, which may consist of the actual cost of carrying out an agreed upon portion of the development, a cash contribution, or a combination of both; operate and maintain the recreation facilities for the life of the project; and provide access to all on equal terms. Operations and results during fiscal year. The preconstruction planning was continued at a cost of $510,600. Major work activities during fiscal year 1981 have been completed on the Draft WES Model Study of the pollution control structure located at the drainage outlet of the Twelve Towns District. Also completed in FY 81 were the updated Flood Damage Assesement and the Extraordinary Natural Features, Lower Clinton Basin Study. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction has not yet started. 78. RIVER ROUGE, MICH. Location. River Rouge basin is in the southeastern corner of the lower peninsula of the State of Michigan, within Wayne, Oakland and Washtenaw Counties. Basin is fan shaped and extends about 24 miles from north to south and about 33 miles from east to west. Total area comprises about 464 square miles. (See Geological Survey, Detroit quadrangle.) Existing project. Provides for flood protection along main stem of Rouge River from navigation turning basin to Michigan Avenue consisting of channel enlargement and straightening and alteration or replacement of existing bridges. Channel work includes deepening, widening, straightening, and paving existing river channel for about 30,300 feet along existing channel. Realigned channel will have a length of 22,100 feet. Channel depths under design discharge conditions vary from about 25 feet at navigation turning basin to about 20 feet at Michigan Avenue. Bridge work involves construction of one new railroad bridge and alteration of two railroad bridges at Federal expense and construction and alteration of highway bridges at local interest expense. Project is designed to provide protection for a peak-flood discharge of about 24,000 cubic feet per second. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: 31-38 DETROIT, MICH., DISTRICT Settlement of Penn Central contract was completed at a cost of $-10,795. Engineering, supervision and administration cost $4,490. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project is complete. 79. SAGINAW RIVER, MICH. Location. Saginaw River basin including its tributaries, Tittabawassee, Shiawassee, Flint and Cass Rivers, drains an area of 6,260 square miles in the east central part of Michigan and empties into Saginaw Bay, an arm of Lake Huron. Bay City, near mouth of river, and Saginaw, 22 miles upstream from mouth, are on Federally improved deep-draft Saginaw River navigation channel. (See Saginaw and Flint Geological quadrangles and NOAA Nautical Chart 14867.) Existing project. Provides for improvements in Saginaw River Basin for flood control and other purposes: (a) at Middle Branch and South Branch, Cass River, to provide for major drainage improvements by channel improvements on Middle and South Branches, including a short reach of East Branch, at an estimated U.S. cost (July 1961) for construction of $1,448,000 for Middle and South Branches; provided local interests contribute in cash 42 percent of first cost of major drainage project on Middle Branch, and 38 percent of first cost of major drainage project on South Branch, exclusive of cost of rights-of-way and other work required as local cooperation, and give assurances satisfactory to Secretary of the Army they will construct and maintain local drainage work required to fully and effectively utilize improvements to be provided under the Federal projects; (b) at Vassar on Cass River, to provide for flood protection of areas on north and south sides of river by channel improvement, levee construction, floodwalls, modification of Moore Drain, and related work at an estimated U.S. cost (October 1980) of $7,340,000 for construction; (c) at Frankenmuth on Cass River, to provide for flood protection of areas on north side of river by channel improvement, levee construction related work, at an estimated U.S. cost (July 1974) of $410,900 for construction; (d) at Flint on Flint River, to provide for flood protection of areas on both sides of main stem of Flint River and its tributaries, Swartz and Thread Creeks by channel improvement, bridge alterations, floodwall and levee construction, and related work, at an estimated U.S. cost (Oct 1980) of $17,774,200 for construction; provided local interest contribute in cash 1 percent of first cost of project, exclusive of costs of rights-ofways (e) at Corunna on Shiawassee River, to provide for flood protection by channel improvement, levee construction, and related at an estimated U.S. cost (July 1961) of $48,000 for construction; provided local interests modify spillway of mill dam at Corunna at their own expense, substantially in accordance with plan of District Engineer and subject to approval of Chief of Engineers, or in lieu thereof, contribute to the United States actual cost of modification to be performed by the United States; (f) at Owosso on Shiawassee River, to provide for flood protection by channel improvement at an estimated U.S. cost (July 1961) of $425,000 for construction; (g) at Midland on Tittabawassee River, to provide for flood protection through non-structural (permanent evacuation) measures at an estimated U.S. cost (Oct 1980) of $5,885,000 for implementation; (h) at Shiawassee Flats along lower reaches of the four principal tributaries of Saginaw River, to provide for flood protection, including fish and wildlife areas; by channel improvement, levees, lateral reservoirs with control structures and related at an estimated U.S. cost (Oct 1979 of $50,794,900 for new work, of which $47,154,900 is allocated to flood control and $3,640,000 to fish and wildlife purposes; provided local interests contribute in cash 5 percent of cost of rights-of-way for flood control and other work required as local cooperation, and furnish one-half of land required for fish and wildlife areas; provided that the Federal allocation for conservation does not exceed amount obtained by taking 28 percent of project cost for Shiawassee Flats unit and subtracting therefrom one-half cost of lands for conservation; and provided further that before starting works for flood control to Shiawassee Flats, Chief of Engineers and Director, Fish and Wildlife Service, prepare a plan mutually acceptable to Secretary of the Army and Secretary of the Interior for operation of fish and wildlife areas to required degree of controlled storage of flood-waters while preserving the maximum fish and wildlife benefits. Total estimated cost for new work, for active portion 1980 is $76,900,000 including $3,640,000 Fish and Wildlife costs and $1,985,000 to be contributed by local interests. Total estimated cost (1980) to local interests is $11,285,000. Loyal cooperation. Responsible local interests must make cash contributions as called for above; furnish lands, and rights-of-way, including removal of buildings, for construction; hold the United States free from damage; maintain and operate all works after completions; establish and enforce regulations designed to prevent encroachments in improved channels; and bear expense of constructing highway relocations and highway bridges, alter bridge approaches and existing highway bridge approaches and existing highway bridges (except underpinning and bridge raising), and alter utilities. Required assurances for Flint River at Flint were furnished by City of Flint and accepted by the United States 23 November 1962. Estimated required cash contribution for Flint ($56,000) was furnished 20 February 1963. An additional $117,000 was furnished by the City to cover increased construction costs. Required assurances for Cass River at Frankenmuth were accepted on 8 September 1964. All 31-39 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 necessary lands, easements, and rights-of-way have been provided. The Midland City Council has, by resolution, indicated its intent to provide the assurances of local cooperation for the Midland Flood Control Project. The Vassar City Council in 1976 indicated a willingness and capability to provide the assurances of local cooperation. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Midland: The Final Phase I General Design Memorandum on the flood control project at Midland was completed in June 1980 at a cost of $14,500. The Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors approved the report in 1981. Shiawassee: A Draft Phase I General Design Memorandum on the project was prepared during the summer of 1981. The report is now undergoing revision to address the North Central Division comments and concerns. Total cost for Shiawassee for new work is $307,400. Flint: An adjustment of -$19,323 was made in contract completed last fiscal year. Supervision and administration cost $17,139. Vassar: The Preliminary Draft Phase I General Design Memorandum was prepared, submitted to North Central Division, and approved. The Draft Phase I General Design Memorandum was initiated. Total cost for new work for Vassar this fiscal year is $137,300. Condition at end of fiscal year. The Frankenmuth and Flint portions of the project are complete. 80. SEBEWAING, SEBEWAING RIVER, MICH. Location. Sebewaing River drains an area of 105 square miles in Huron and Tuscola Counties on westerly side of Thumb area of Lower Peninsula of Michigan and discharges into Saginaw Bay, an arm of Lake Huron, 20 miles northeast from mouth of Saginaw River. Village of Sebewaing is near mouth of river. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14863.) Existing project. Enlarging present channel of Sebewaing River through Village of Sebewaing, Michigan, to a capacity of 7,500 cubic feet per second from junction of Columbia and State drains to a point 4,500 feet lakeward from railroad bridge near mouth; altering railroad bridge and three highway bridges to permit free passage of ice; and removal of present dike on south side of channel lakeward from railroad bridge. Project is designed to provide protection for Village of Sebewaing from floods with a frequency of once in 15 years and with a magnitude greater than the maximum flood of record. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Complied with except for furnishing easements and rights-of-way for removal of remaining portion of dike on south side of channel lakeward from railroad bridge. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition survey, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed at a cost of $1,109. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was completed in 1948 except for removal of the remaining portion of old dike located on the south side of the channel lakeward from the railroad bridge. 81. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS The listed projects were inspected during this period. Battle Creek, Kalamazoo River, Michigan; Kawkawlin, Kawkawlin River, Michigan; Sebewaing, Sebewaing River, Michigan; Flint, Flint River, Michigan; Frankenmuth, Cass River, Michigan; Mount Clemens Spillway and Cutoff Canal, Clinton River, Michigan; Red Run, Clinton River, Michigan; East Rockwood; Silver Creek, Michigan; Estral Beach, Lake Erie, Michigan; Fort Wayne Mechanic St. Dike, St. Marys River, Indiana; Burr Oak, Prairie River, Michigan. Fiscal year costs were $72,421. Total costs fo end of fiscal year were $622,669. 82. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See Table 31-H. 83. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency Flood Control Activities. Flood Fighting (Public Law 99, 84th Congress and Antecedent Legislation). More than 5 inches of rain fell in the Grand Rapids area Sunday, May 10, and into the morning of Monday, May 11th, 1981. Lansing reported 3.19 inches during the same period and other southcentral lower Michigan stations reported 2 to 31-40 DETROIT, MICH., DISTRICT 4 inches. Some lowland areas and basements were flooded although all major streams remained below flood stage. Extensive overland flooding occurred with numerous isolated damages reported. Three Corps teams were dispatched and 3,000 sandbags and 3 pumps were made available. Approximately five (5) inches of rain fell in St. Joseph and Fort Wayne Counties of Indiana and Berrien County, Michigan early A.M. of 13 June 1981. One Corps employee was dispatched to the scene. Additional four (4) employees loaded and shipped sandbags. EOM and Chiefs of Grand Haven and Detroit Projects Office administered. Approximately the following sandbags were moved: a. 100,000 Corps storage to South Bend, Indiana. b. 30,000 Berrien County Michigan to South Bend, Indiana. c. 5,000 South Bend to Fort Wayne, Indiana. Also, as a result of the heavy rain of 13 June 1981, NCE was notified by Emergency Services Division of the Michigan State Police on 15 June 1981, that a dam controlling Dayton Lake near Galien, Michigan, was endangered and that several pumps, including power take-offs, were requested to bring the level of the lake down and prevent damages. Major damage was prevented. Had the dam failed, at least 500 feet of highway U.S. 12 and other downstream areas would have been endangered. In response to localized, heavy rain (2-5 inches) that occurred in S.E. Michigan during 3-5 September 1981, a flood recon of the Raisin River and its tributary, Black Creek, was initiated 4 September 1981. Reconnaissance disclosed several parks (located in the Raisin River floodplain) in Tecumseh, Adrian, Blissfield, Dundee and Monroe flooded, along with isolated, localized flooding of cropland and some basement flooding caused directly and indirectly from the Raisin River between Adrian and Monroe. However, contact made with State and local emergency management officials (4 and 8 September 1981) disclosed that the locals felt that they had the situation well-in-hand and that no request for Federal operational assistance was received, nor was such a request anticipated. Flood Control activities pursuant to Section 205, Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended. During the fiscal year studies were conducted at Flint Twp., Michigan $12,900, Monroe, Michigan $5,000 and Paw Paw, Michigan $19,700. 84. SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY WATERS Field operations. The following field operations were conducted during the current period: In support of the development/calibration of Detroit District mathematical models, soundings and discharge measurements were conducted on the St. Clair, Detroit, and St. Marys Rivers; velocity measurements were conducted in the upper St. Marys River; under-ice discharge measurements were collected on the St. Lawrence River for the St. Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation; two hydrometeorological stations were installed at the head of the St. Clair River; and technical assistance was provided in a measurement program conducted by Jacksonville District. During the winter months, the District observes the presence of ice in the St. Marys, St. Clair, and Detroit Rivers as an ongoing mission. The District monitors key telemetric water level gages (telemark) in these rivers for continuous updating of the hydrograph for possible detection of ice jams and associated potential for flooding to provide advance warning to area residents and other governmental agencies (in support of respective Flood Alert Plan). International Activities. The following activities were conducted specifically for the International Joint Commission (IJC) Boards and Committees: Members of the Detroit District staff attended the fall semiannual appearance of the International Great Lakes Boards before the Commission in Ottawa. a. International Lake Superior Board of Control. The Detroit District Engineer is the United States Regulation Representative for the Board of Control. In support of the U.S. Section of the Board, the District provided monthly Lake Superior outflow recommendations based upon a review of the hydrologic factors which influence the future regulation of Lake Superior. These recommendations were based on the use of probability forecasts of water supplies routed through the lakes, rendering outflows under Plan 1977. A report describing Plan 1977 was completed by the Detroit District for the Board of Control in May 1981. An operational guide to Plan 1977 was drafted and presented to the Board. The Board will release the document after the IJC provides guidance on Condition lb. The Detroit District is also investigating various alternatives of flow in the rapids, to satisfy fishery concerns. The Board will review the matter in FY82. Predischarge of water from Lake Superior continued, in preparation for Stage II of Great Lakes Power Corporation, limited redevelopment. By the end of September 1981 the required 0.27 foot of predischarge had been accumulated. Stage I monitoring of water quality continued into August. From 25 August to 30 September partial baseline data were gathered in preparation for Stage II monitoring of water quality. Detailed testing of the Canadian portion of the compensating works was carried out for Great Lakes Power Limited. The final report on this testing was received by the 31-41 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 Board in August 1981. b. International Niagara Board of Control and International Niagara Working Committee. A member of the Great Lakes Hydraulics and Hydrology staff is on the U.S. Section of the Working Committee. The District was involved in the engineering and development of revised rating curves for the Ashland Avenue gage. The International Niagara Board of Control selected a representative rating and requested that it be accepted and implemented by the International Niagara Committee. The Board directed the Working Committee to make cableway flow measurements in FY82 and successive years, to verify the accuracy of the new rating curves with emphasis placed on the low flow range. The Great Lakes Hydraulics and Hydrology Branch is also involved in developing new "M" factors, which are traditionally used to compute storage in the Maid-of-the-Mist Pool during transition hours when changes are made in the fall's flows. New "M" factors are needed in the computation of Niagara River flows by the Niagara Committee. c. International St. Lawrence River Board of Control. When requested, supported the Buffalo District in its activities. d. International Great Lakes Diversions and Consumptive Uses Study Board. The Detroit District Engineer is Chairman of the U.S. Section of the Working Committee. Personnel from the District hold membership on the Diversions and Environmental Evaluation Subcommittee, and on the Public Involvement Ad Hoc Group. In support of the Board and Working Committee, staff of the Detroit District assisted in the development of 43 diversion management scenarios, 13 of which were hydrologically evaluated in detail. Of these 13, ten were further evaluated economically and one environmentally. The District staff also completed evaluation of the effects to levels and flows from projected increases in the consumptive uses of the Great Lakes water. The draft of the fifth "Diversions" newsletter was completed. Further, the staff helped in the finalization of the study report, including its Annexes and Appendices. Printing of the report is scheduled to be completed by December 1981. Members of the District also prepared for the Study Board's briefings of activities, issues and problems to the IJC. e. International Lake Erie Regulation Study Board. Chief, Great Lakes Hydraulics and Hydrology Branch is Chairman of the U.S. Section of the Regulation Subcommittee. Staff members also provided input to the other subcommittees. During the year, Branch personnel assisted in the finalization of the study's main report and several of its Appendices. Branch members prepared for the Study Board's briefing to the IJC. f. International Great Lakes Technical Information Network Board. The Chief of the Great Lakes Hydraulics and Hydrology Branch is Chairman of the U.S. Section of this Board. The Detroit District also provides the U.S. Secretary to the Board as well as membership on the Hydraulics and Hydrology Committees. The Board developed and approved terms of reference for the Hydraulics, Hydrology and System Evaluation Committees, which comprise the Board's substructure. Committee membership was assigned from nominations made by involved agencies. Individual Plans of Study and cost estimates were drafted by the committees and approved by the Board. The Board's main report to the IJC is scheduled for December 1983. Coordinating Committee on Great Lakes Basin Hydraulics and Hydrologic Data. The Great Lakes Hydraulics and Hydrology Branch of the District provided membership on this committee and its subcommittees. Operations continued, pertaining to the coordination of basic hydraulic and hydrologic data with Canada. Work continues on other Committee reports, among which is a report that documents the procedures used to determine St. Clair River and Detroit River flows for the period 1900-1978. Another report being worked on in the Branch documents the discharge measurements made on the Great Lakes, Connecting Channels and St. Lawrence River during period 1900-1978. NCD Master Plan for Water Control Data System. The Distict completed its input for presentation to OCE. The District's plan calls for an annual average charge of $367,000 for updating the Great Lakes gaging network for fiscal years 1983-1987. In addition $250,000 has been requested in FY84 for a dedicated in-house mini-computer for real-time water control activities. Hydraulics and Hydrology of the Great Lakes. Studies to improve the existing Great Lakes water level forecasting system, including investigations into the factors affecting the Great Lakes water balance relationship (i.e. runoff, precipitation over water, evaporation, ice retardation, etc.) and use of real-time hydrologic data were continued by Great Lakes Hydraulics and Hydrology Branch staff members. Levels of the Great Lakes. The Branch provided technical information and expertise regarding lake levels and longrange still water forecasts to many interested parties such as: Congressmen, State and local officials, news media, navigation and power interests, and concerned property owners. Explanation of the water levels was supplied to the public in the form of direct answers to numerous inquiries, addresses to various civic groups, and interviews with news media. The publication of an International (U.S. and Canada) Forecast of Great Lakes Water Levels, under the auspices of the Coordinating Committee on Basic Hydraulic and Hydrologic Data, was continued during the period. In support of these forecasts, and to assist in lake regulation, funds have been provided to 31-42 DETROIT, MICH., DISTRICT the Department of Commerce for maintenance of eleven A special hydrologic study to develop a regional flood fretelemetric water level gages (Telemeter) at selected sites quency study for the Saginaw River Basin was initiated in throughout the Great Lakes to obtain more real-time data. FY80 but due to limited funding, the study is scheduled to be completed in FY83. 85. GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS SURVEYS Fiscal year costs were $867,404 for navigation studies, and $816,267 for flood control studies. A special study, which continued during the fiscal year was the Great Lakes water levels study $150,824. Coordination studies with other agencies include soil conservation coordination studies $1,548; River Basin Commission, $4,697; National Wildlife and Scenic Rivers systems, $2,043; Water Quality Management (Section 208), $2,395; Coastal Zone Management, $14,955 and coordination studies with states (Section 22) $93,700 and technical assistance for erosion (Section 55) $4,510. 86. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA A draft report for the Lansing Flood Preparedness Plan was submitted to the Michigan Department of Natural Resources (MDNR) for review and coordination in July 1980. The draft study was based on hydraulic data (HEC 2 computer input data) supplied by the Michigan DNR which was developed for the Lansing Flood Insurance Study. Comments on the draft report were received from Michigan DNR on 5 June 1981 recommending the use of revised flood insurance data. This report will be completed in FY82. A Phase II lake level study for Anchor Bay was initiated in FY80 and completed in FY81. Phase II lake level studies for Little Bay De Noc and Big Bay De Noc were also initiated and completed in FY81. Twelve Michigan flood Insurance studies, Alpena City of Alpena County, Michigan; Alpena Township of Alpena County; Banks Township of Antrim County; Boyne City of Charlevoix County; Charlevoix City of Charlevoix County; East Jordan City Charlevoix County; Elk Rapids Village of Antrim County; Elmwood Township Leelanau County; Ellsworth Village of Antrim County; Milton Township of Antrim County; Petoskey City of Emmet County; Traverse City Grand Traverse County, initiated late in FY79 were completed in FY81. No work on flood insurance studies are scheduled for FY82. 31-43 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 31-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 September 30, 1981 1. Algoma Harbor, New Work Wis. Approp. - Cost - Maint. Approp. 114,000 Cost 114,000 2. Arcadia Harbor, New Work Mich. Approp. - Cost Maint. Approp. 67,000 Cost 67,001 3. Ashland Harbor, New Work Wis. Approp. - Cost - Maint. Approp. 36,000 Cost 36,000 4. Beaver Bay, New Work Minn. Approp. 10,000 Cost 9,873 5. Big Bay Harbor, New Work Mich. Approp. - Cost - Maint. Approp. 73,000 Cost 72,396 6. Black River Harbor, New Work Mich. (Port Huron) Approp. - Cost - Contributed Funds New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 7. Bolles Harbor, New Work Mich. Approp. Cost Maint. 9,565 9,560 Approp. 537,252 Cost 518,548 Diked Disposal 334,000 Approp. 484,168 Cost 8. Caseville Harbor, New Work Mich. Approp. - Cost - 195,000 4,678 85,100 195,000 4,678 85,100 58,000 53,000 66,000 57,969 53,031 65,992 - 65,000 - - 52,527 - 5,000 37,000 5,000 37,000 - 25,000 1,162 24,875 22,000 10,000 9,307 15,097 46,000 39,000 41,379 41,649 26,812 10,612 14,092 23,337 8,000 145,000 26,644 143,619 5,000 -78,000 4,999 77,994 448,000 448,000 70,000 69,795 3,000 10,575 58,000 11,231 3,846 13,192 128,000 125,168 31-44 292,0101 292,0101 879,961 879,961 575,048 575,040 1,760,645 1,748,172 1,948,796 1,929,645 293,000 292,602 375,4332 375,4122 958,610 909,805 480,2443 480,2448 349,921 349,921 492,7964 492,1424 426,413' 426,413' 855,933 851,658 1,190,550 1,190,550 587,3146 587,3146 DETROIT, MICH., DISTRICT TABLE 31-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 September 30, 1981 9. Cedar River Harbor, Mich. 10. Charlevoix Harbor Mich. 11. Cheboygan Harbor, Mich. 12. Clinton River Mich. 13. Cornucopia Harbor, Wis. 14. Cross Village, Mich. 15. Detour Harbor, Mich. Contributed Funds Maint. Approp. 476,000 Cost 474,953 Diked Disposal Approp. 19,000 Cost 18,924 New Work Approp. - Cost - New Work Approp. 60,000 Cost 59,981 Maint. Approp. 31,000 Cost 30,835 Rehab. Approp. - Cost - New Work Approp. - Cost - Maint. Approp. 9,906 Cost 9,906 New Work Approp. - Cost - Maint. Approp. 1,630 Cost 1,434 Diked Disposal Approp. 10,000 Cost 6,517 New Work Approp. - Cost - Maint. Approp. 81,000 Cost 81,300 New Work Approp. - Cost - New Work Approp. 70,000 Cost 70,029 New Work Approp. - Cost - 10,000 151,000 36,000 11,048 38,199 148,801 10,000 - - 10,076 - - 100,000 100,000 15,000 99,997 94,251 20,751 26,000 - - 26,019 - - 77,000 67,000 891,200 73,819 67,223 887,546 13,000 7,000 20,460 11,000 7,000 21,460 - - -. - - - 172,161 -16,534 31,827 172,320 -16,566 31,879 16,500 11,000 18,691 11,443 2,000 2,884 67,600 5,000 103,000 67,600 5,000 93,598 70,000 79,000 130,000 69,998 77,994 130,942 25,000 100,000 797,000 24,877 69,065 824,952 - 500,000 500,000 - - 916,961 31-45 785,664 785,664 31,206 31,206 215,000 214,999 180,623 180,623 2,893,900 2,887,123 1,129,396 1,129,396 504,236 504,236 492,407 491,407 549,7987 549,7987 952,785 952,699 177,200 177,196 462,653 462,653 593,307 583,905 279,000 278,934 1,139,510 1,139,339 1,000,000 916,961 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 31-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 September 30, 1981 16. Detroit River, Mich. 17. Duluth-Superior Harbor, Minn. 18. Fox River, Wisc. 19. Frankfort Harbor, Mich. 20. Grand Haven Harbor, Mich. Section 111 New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 1,722,600 3,584,200 11,390,800 11,797,500 1,724,252 3,555,331 11,381,618 11,799,911 3,214,100 10,697,600 11,832,000 7,993,700 3,214,327 10,701,152 11,815,315 8,004,553 2,240,100 2,215,900 2,151,000 1,940,000 2,498,637 2,199,690 2,161,465 1,930,938 265,000 881,000 -99,000 -1,900 164,715 754,755 127,584 -1,898 1,706,400 2,700,000 1,735,100 1,628,000 1,595,316 2,814,731 1,751,963 1,555,877 180,000 1,507,000 360,000 136,000 182,932 1,502,218 367,146 138,797 21,500 77,700 81,000 76,254 29,869 77,867 80,855 64,778 175,000 174,909 91 - 199,000 543,000 481,000 1,614,000 198,674 543,424 474,240 1,595,885 -3,000 -3,005 - 2,000 - - 2,000 - - 124,000 -60,000 - 124,000 -60,000 31-46 76,877,3578 76,877,3578 41,623,078 41,604,638 40,407,694 40,400,610 16,109,2589 16,109,1589 23,671,170 23,647,911 1,556,249 1,556,249 3,753,33410 3,753,334 29,681,67311 29,604,556 1,955,15912 1,955,159 4,374,397 4,374,304 274,776 274,776 433,754 421,988 1,458,46913 1,458,469 12,708,29314 12,683,386 813,613 813,613 780,400 780,400 64,000 64,000 DETROIT, MICH., DISTRICT TABLE 31-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 September 30, 1981 21. Grand Marais New Work Harbor, Minn. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost 22. Grand Traverse, New Work Mich. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 23. Green Bay New Work Harbor, Wis. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost 24. Hammond Bay New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 25. Harbor Beach New Work Harbor, Mich. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost 26. Harrisville New Work Harbor, Mich. Approp. Cost 74,000 19,500 2,000 4,000 74,000 19,080 2,420 4,000 490,000 491,154 88,000 87,637 23,000 3,000 3,200 15,841 4,983 8,354 79,000 46,000 57,000 79,019 46,448 24,135 110,000 40,000 55,000 104,788 28,043 72,097 415,000 1,385,000 445,000 1,171,000 410,000 1,389,452 435,343 1,181,114 2,696,600 2,532,000 30,000 -250,000 2,508,265 2,722,338 19,094 -236,094 - - - 4,148 - - - 4,148 1' 22,323 21,000 1,683,000 40,000 22,138 21,185 1,682,999 40,002 89,000 80,459 100,000 99,564 9,000 - - 9,569 5 - 10,000 40,000 54,000 10,517 39,777 52,996 31-47 450,972 450,972 546,341 546,341 1,230,000 1,230,000 226,971 226,949 1,178,483 1,145,618 9,936,39515 16 9,936,32315 16 9,577,71317 9,577,621 5,554,807 5,554,807 1,015,366 1,015,366 162,242 162,242 1,200,598 1,200,598 4,369,190 4,369,190 194,504 194,504 243,100 243,100 1,656,638 1,655,410 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 31-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 September 30, 1981 Maint. Approp. Cost 27. Holland Harbor, New Work Mich. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Section 111 Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost 28. Inland Route, New Work Mich. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost 29. Kenosha Harbor, New Work Wis. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. 30. Kewaunee Harbor, Wis. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost 51,696 51,693 449,000 564,094 185,000 184,890 331,000 336,003 75,000 72,493 102,000 8,000 1,050 101,555 8,445 1,054 -7 - - 723,000 665,000 567,000 723,165 657,625 561,194 83,000 19,000 7,200 83,000 19,000 6,325 21,000 -12,000 - 19,313 -10,311 - 47,000 92,000 160,000 46,998 94,385 159,213 23,000 23,000 30,000 26,000 25,799 24,551 28,778 27,013 75,000 95,000 79,000 67,000 75,137 95,000 78,999 61,995 145,000 71,000 145,000 71.000 8,000 6.951 31-48 601,573 601,573 1,392,84118 is 9 1,392,841' 9 20 6,447,132 6,433,883 109,200 108,325 502,452 502,452 1,663,300 1,663,300 918,22220 918,222 1,321,488 1,320,577 203,300 203,068 846,9692122 846,96922 23 1,923,377 1,918,370 1,270,275 1,270,275 4,378,600 4,378,600 752,33324 752,33325 1,730,94125 1.729,892 617,300 617,300 DETROIT, MICH., DISTRICT TABLE 31-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 September 30, 1981 Diked Disposal Approp. 17,000 Cost 16,964 31. Keweenaw New Work Waterway, Mich. Approp. - Cost - Maint. Approp. 277,000 Cost 470,366 32. Knife River New Work Harbor, Minn. Approp. - Cost - Maint. Approp. 791 Cost 791 33. La Pointe Harbor, New Work Wis. Approp. - Cost - Maint. Approp. 7,574 Cost 7,574 34. Lake St. Clair, New Work Mich., Channels Approp. - Cost - Maint. Approp. 695,000 Cost 688,197 Diked Disposal Approp. -1,000 Cost -1,000 35. Leland Harbor, New Work Mich. Approp. - Cost - Maint. Approp. 87,003 Cost 86,866 Rehab. Approp. - Cost - 36. Lexington New Work Harbor, Mich. Approp. -38,859 Cost 737 33,000 70,000 1,777,208 33,036 61,792 1,770,999 27,000 132,000 511,000 20,100 133,888 506,487 - 20,000 60,000 - 18,300 44,466 6,241 18,100 4,048 6,241 18,100 4,048 - - - 5,400 1,200 1,899 5,400 162 1,899 59,000 662,00 90,000 65,500 660,187 74,942 -5,000 -5,500 1,000 1,000 681 1,321 92,000 103,000 37,000 92,092 100,270 39,783 - 389,000 -25,000 2,009 179,843 177,156 31-49 2,188,669 2,174,252 5,967,141 5,967,141 9,348,68426 9,338,675 412,945 395,711 220,426 220,426 130,874 130,874 63,640 62,602 7,675,35727 7,675,35727 4,803,08428 4,785,787 5,119,800 5,119,800 1,027,08929 1,027,089 849,236 846,435 70,678 70,678 2,025,304 2,017,765 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 31-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 September 30, 1981 Contributed Funds New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 37. Little Lake New Work Harbor, Mich. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 38. Ludington Harbor, New Work Mich. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost 39. Lutsen Harbor, New Work Minn. Approp. Cost 40. Manistee Harbor, New Work Mich. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost 41. Manistique New Work Harbor, Mich. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 42. Manitowoc New Work Harbor, Wis. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost 43. Menominee New Work Harbor &,River, Approp. Mich. & Wis. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 11,879 4,674 4,674 138,000 137,116 3,260,000 2,121,538 29,000 28,897 10,000 10,498 -136,112 - - 16,000 10,680 4,860 16,000 10,680 4,860 239,149 233,000 168,000 236,614 236,285 168,122 959,000 1,250,000 - 1,613,450 2,608,405 41,569 33,000 179,000 204,000 33,155 101,069 279,859 - 25,000 113,000 1,029 25,074 81,533 86,000 145,000 109,000 54,000 88,804 138,127 111,724 58,280 4,923 22,669 5,790 99,000 4,922 3,659 24,802 99,000 - 27,700 180,000 97,000 - 14,452 158,765 120,470 198,200 110,000 104,000 316,000 198,201 97,623 116,377 315,982 80,000 - - - 80,705 - - - - 55,000 -14,000 24,850 - 12,404 23,596 24,850 31-50 1,088,888 1,088,888 48,913 48,913 600,47830 600,47832 1,813,774 1,813,761 8,447,20231 8,443,1433 5,917,80032 5,915,728 357,913 357,913 357,000 325,481 2,696,52233 2,696,522 3,243,43384 3,243,415 1,374,164 1,374,164 1,299,35536 1,299,355 87 1,538,365 1,538,365 1,185,8643 1,174,851 2,976,825x7 2,976,806 3,081,756 3,081,756 533,47638 533,476 1,422,08739 1,422,08739 DETROIT, MICH., DISTRICT TABLE 31-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 September 30, 1981 Rehab. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost Contributed Funds New Work Contrib. Cost 44. Milwaukee New Work Harbor, Wis. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost 45. Monroe Harbor, New Work Mich. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost 46. Muskegon Harbor, New Work Mich. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Section 111 Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost 47. New Buffalo New Work Harbor, Mich. Approp. Cost Contributed Funds New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 18,000 45,000 76,000 51,700 28,068 41,049 71,561 60,076 2,750,000 900,000 56,000 1,446,000 2,835,144 902,996 41,709 1,445,281 10,000 - - - 10,000 - - - 294,000 1,409,000 292,015 1,408,928 81,000 79,869 110,000 109,997 519,000 533,000 520,700 522,194 64,100 206,000 319,000 42,007 193,652 326,309 - -5,000 - -6,992 1,995 - 182,000 213,000 379,000 170,000 294,231 208,072 381,314 172,835 - 10,000 - 10,000 2,405,000 1,685,000 2,444,455 1,558,182 - -64,000 - -63,993 - -20,533 20,943 2,510 288,000 -115,000 288,000 -115,000 -263,000 - -140,493 4,874 46,000 150,000 222,000 1,200,000 45,998 149,998 216,205 1,203,832 31-51 1,351,852 1,351,852 360,661 360,644 36,762 36,762 8,231,0244o 8,231,02440 21,322,57441 21,307,557 1,891,810 1,891,810 6,380,925 6,380,925 987,34042 987,34044 7,216,770 7,205,606 926,900 897,827 3,017,11043 3,017,11043 4,082,11544 4,081,949 183,000 183,000 3,877,000 3,877,000 1,285,716 1,285,716 1,186,467 1,186,467 1,633,000 1,631,033 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 31-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 September 30, 1981 Diked Disposal Approp. Cost 48. Ontonagon Harbor, New Work Mich. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost 49. Pentwater Harbor, New Work Mich. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 50. Point Lookout New Work Harbor, Mich. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost 51. Portage Lake, New Work Mich. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 52. Port Sanilac New Work Harbor, Mich. Approp. Cost Contributed Funds New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Contributed Funds Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost Section 111 Maint. Approp. Cost 45,000 30,000 319,000 322,337 17,000 63,000 96,500 16,990 60,246 97,845 20,000 - - 25,850 9,150 - 86,000 163,000 687,000 85,966 125,324 724,698 - 15,000 - 15,000 176,500 175,081 396,90345 396,90345 5,090,25346 5,090,23746 15,000 15,000 179,899 179,899 102,000 101,000 67,000 92,000 135,243 101,114 64,948 94,019 29,000 31,000 39,000 10,000 28,999 31,000 38,699 8,197 22,000 21,442 -27,000 -27,114 -14,000 782 1,742 13,000 94,000 -7,400 13,558 86,228 372 25,984 118,941 194,001 12,884 131,308 194,812 - -12,975 - - -12,975 - - -3,082 - - 12,975 - 354,000 476,000 -23,000 108,669 721,249 -22,469 49,000 26,596 115,000 - 70,899 12,625 36,000 95,000 10,959 120,041 2,346,052 2,346,018 2,642,584 2,642,584 215,953 213,847 121,600 121,600 256,129 256,129 1,417,971 1,417,937 1,245,963 1,245,963 487,018 487,018 1,485,152 1,460,196 115,000 83,527 9,158 9,158 131,000 131,000 31-52 DETROIT, MICH., DISTRICT TABLE 31-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 September 30, 1981 53. Port Washington New Work Harbor, Wis. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost Contributed Funds New Work Contrib Cost 54. Presque Isle New Work Harbor, Mich. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost 55. Racine Harbor, New Work Wis. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. 56. Rouge River, Mich. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost 120,000 445,000 1,128,000 -313,000 110,001 104,945 1,086,721 56,529 127,000 110,000 395,000 243,000 126,999 110,002 301,639 336,358 2,603,20447 2,581,39847 2,129,06848 2,129,06548 10,621 10,621 16,000 15,998 140,000 1,459,000 2 0 1,375,913 248 23,000 3,000 13,546 8,213 4,000 7,000 11 4,001 7,001 11 28,300 65,000 20,318 66,042 173,000 90,000 173,000 89,907 1,787 260 1,880 260 16,420 979,000 795,800 707,000 593,000 980,187 798,312 708,564 592,382 609,100 4,073,800 3,960,000 3,033,200 607,753 4,074,984 3,959,950 3,032,905 5,000 3,087 1,624,000 1,624,000 1,216,492 4,210 1,216,461 0,849 525,881 0,849 525,881 76,500 76,500 5,500 5,500 5,470 5,470 32,000 1,330,31549 38,020 1,329,39549 ,338 2,630,79060 ,312 2,630,764 1,253,645 1,253,645 3,948,754 3,948,754 675,25151 675,25151 12,437,78852 12,437,13852 14,093,823 14,093,311 31-53 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 31-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 September 30, 1981 57. Saginaw River, Mich. (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 58. St. Clair River, Mich. 59. St. Joseph Harbor, Mich. Section 111 60. St. Marys River, Mich. 61. Saugatuck Harbor, Mich. and Kalamazoo River, Mich. New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 6,765,600 680,000 1,767,000 2,371,000 6,750,513 655,487 1,765,226 2,396,906 3,213,700 1,190,000 480,000 2,770,000 3,213,694 1,189,176 480,699 2,770,177 534,000 766,000 432,000 392,900 533,797 765,840 428,980 389,001 - - -1,000 - - - -798 - 466,000 297,000 212,000 366,000 465,158 296,386 212,803 365,898 36,000 37,167 350,000 347,079 -13,000 359,941 39,500 45,176 294,000 294,809 -165,000 -157,050 61,000 62,021 375,000 377,111 80,400 80,761 -45,000 -45,000 14,917,12753 14,917,127 13,600 13,600 19,171,880 19,164,831 17,860,400 17,860,318 19,213,24654 19,213,246 8,594,557 8,587,272 1,804,48555 1,804,48560 5,927,949 5,926,990 962,216 962,216 387,776 387,768 1,326,300 1,326,299 -30,000 160,657,07156 112 -24,718 160,657,07056 6,611,300 7,075,554 8,254,000 7,972,400 130,422,352 6,581,354 7,087,664 8,265,172 7,881,832 130,255,912 82,000 31,001 57,215 70,601 112,085 31,115 57,215 70,411 13,100 13,100 364,52757 364,52757 2,311,62758 2,311,43658 31-54 DETROIT, MICH., DISTRICT TABLE 31-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT fee Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 September 30, 1981 62. Saxon Harbor, New Work Minn. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 63. Sebewaing River, New Work Mich. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost 64. Sheboygan New Work Harbor, Wis. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost 65. South Haven New Work Harbor, Mich. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost Section 111 Maint. Approp. Cost 66. Sturgeon Bay, New Work Wis. & Lake Mich. Approp. Ship Canal, Wis. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 12,392 13,839 -4,919 -2,115 10,000 20,000 -14,200 2,862 11,621 1,317 10,000 54,000 10,000 53,999 9,113 470,479 55,687 9,113 360,479 165,687 133,000 1,046,000 3,000 137,948 1,052,331 4,704 1,000 -161 50,000 295,000 46,700 375,000 50,000 282,622 59,078 208,742 - .- - -. 27,000 57,000 67,800 - 42,058 57,000 67,224 - 483 - - - 10,000 25,591 -4,151 9,999 25,590 ' -4,153 2,000 1,324 15,000 14,977 76,000 75,976 725 23 - 324,000 320,670 415,000 250,000 30,790 88,000 414,520 238,102 43,168 72,993 31-55 523,30769 523,307 339,691 339,690 35,573 35,573 945,535 945,535 1,303,446 1,302,099 1,136,0886 1,136,088 2,655,39261 2,489,134 609,028 609,028 500,292 499,714 984,42662 984,42667 2,879,7176 2,879,693 1,632,076 1,632,076 42,381 42,381 339,000 335,670 1,059,72264 1,059,722" 6,191,6156 6,176,608 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 31-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 September 30, 1981 Diked Disposal Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost 67. Two Harbors, New Work Minn. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 68. Two Rivers New Work Harbor, Wis. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost 69. Whitefish Point New Work Harbor, Mich. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost 77. Red Run, Lower New Work Clinton River, Approp. Mich. Cost 78. River Rouge, New Work Mich. Approp. Cost 79. Saginaw River, New Work Mich. Approp. (Federal Funds) Cost New Work Approp. (Contributed Funds) Cost 80. Sebewaing River, New Work Mich. Approp. Cost 13,000 13,000 9,000 35,000 -7,100 9,000 25,865 2,000 305,000 0 820 126,594 173,058 23,660 4,000 23,618 4,000 7,0 7,0 42,000 16,104 1,380,000 346 41,998 16,106 376,203 1,334, 47,000 5,005 45,033 6,972 725,000 790,000 290,000 507,000 722,495 596,128 484,208 510,556 215,000 685,000 - -15,000 708,316 665,462 16,955 -6,305 2,451,859 820,000 710,000 530,000 2,127,438 1,367,890 693,449 545,638 2,092 77,313 - 248,119 248,084 884,899 884,899 4,040,710" 386 4,035,624 )00 1,585,639 )41 1,585,638 360,32067 360,32072 ,000 5,235,29268 920 5,220,415 1,187,472 1,187,472 58,057 58,057 771,639 771,639 206,128 206,128 1,081 1,081 3,612,000 3,611,938 31,960,332 31,960,332 21,173,959 21,165,679 173,000 172,997 365,64269 365,642 31-56 DETROIT, MICH., DISTRICT TABLE 31-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 September 30, 1981 Maint. Approp. 9,000 3,000 6,000 - 318,144 Cost 9,000 3,000 4,891 1,109 318,144 84. Surveillance of New Work North Boundary Approp. - - - - - Waters Cost - - - - - Maint. Approp. 735,000 780,000 800,000 946,171 33,819,80270 Cost 736,185 770,857 754,228 951,549 33,767,495 1 Includes $92,774 for previous projects. 2 Excludes $56,500 Contributed Funds. 3 Includes $85,849 for new work previous projects. 4 Includes $12,008 for maintenance previous projects. 5 Includes $255,000 Contributed Funds. 6 Includes $293,657 Contributed Funds. 7 Includes $25,500 for previous projects and $289,752 Contributed funds for existing projects. 8 Includes $2,097,254 for previous projects. 9 Includes $1,547,195 for new work for previous projects. 10 Includes $3,239,910 for previous projects. 11 Includes $89,309 for previous projects. 12 Includes $31,709 Contributed Funds. 13 Includes $311,329 for previous projects. 14 Includes $13,437 for previous projects. 15 Includes $396,974 for previous projects. 16 Includes $109,463 for previous projects. 17 Includes $8,918 for previous projects. 18 Includes $176,620 for new work $127,598 for maintenance. 19) Includes $35,705 Contributed Funds. 20 Includes $148,000 Contributed Funds for existing project. 21 Includes $453,839 for previous projects. 22 Excludes $3,000 Contributed Funds. 23 Includes $21,818 for previous projects. 24 Includes 149,312 for previous projects. 25 Includes 88,364 for previous projects. 26 Includes 02,242 for previous projects. 27 Includes 656,000 for previous projects. 28 Includes 235,346 for previous projects. 29 Includes 354,139 Contributed Funds. 30 Includes 57,670 Contributed Funds. 31 Includes 91,416 for previous project. 32 Includes 126,451 for previous projects. 33 Includes 354,999 for previous projects. 34 Includes 150,910 for previous projects. 35 Includes 3,955 for previous projects. 36 Includes $400,126 for previous projects. 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67) 68 69 70 Includes $54,288 for previous projects. Includes $312,423 for previous projects. Includes $36,194 for previous projects. Includes $1,293,220 for previous projects. Includes $459,305 for previous projects. Includes Contributed Funds of $300,000 for new work and $166,667 for maintenance Contributed by: Port Commission of Monroe, $300,000; Consolidated Paper Co. $125,000 and River Raisin Paper Co., $41,667. Includes $613,408 for previous projects. Includes $446,183 for previous projects. Includes $284,802 for previous projects. Includes $113,326 for previous projects. Includes $188,495 for previous projects. Includes 15,123 for previous projects. Includes 427,240 for previous projects. Includes $79,537 for previous projects. Includes $50,084 for previous projects. Includes 56,608 for previous projects. Includes 962,556 for previous projects. Includes $1,671,660 Public Works Funds and $49,419. Includes $503,113 for previous projects. Includes $2,904,807 for previous projects. Includes $90,232 for previous projects. Includes $117,554 for previous projects. Excludes $50,193 for Contributed Funds. Includes $487,817 for previous projects. Includes $87,131 for previous projects. Includes $187,233 for previous projects. Includes $131,239 for previous projects. Includes $323,419 for previous projects. Includes $219,730 for previous projects. Includes $48,404 National Industrial Recovery Act for new work funds. Includes $212,857 for previous projects. Includes $33,113 for previous projects. Includes $15,000 for previous projects. Includes $3,973,897 for previous projects. 31-57 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 31-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 3, 1871 River and Harbor Act H. Doc. 194, 58th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Ex. Doc. 89, 48th Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Reports, 1886, p. 1674; and 1887, p. 1966. ALGOMA HARBOR, WIS. (See Section 1 of Text) Outer basin enclosed by a north pier 1,102 feet long and a south breakwater 1,530 feet long, a 2,100 foot entrance channel and outer basin. ARCADIA HARBOR, MICHIGAN (See Section 2 of Text) Maintenance of Existing 12-Foot Channel. ASHLAND HARBOR, WIS. (See Section 3 of Text) Breakwater 7,900 feet long and dredging to remove a shoal. Appropriation of $60,000 for 'Continuing improvement on enlarged project.' (On completion of Poe Lock in 1896, with available depth of 20 feet, dredging at Ashland Harbor was carried to a similar depth.) Detached breakwater extending 4,700 feet out from shore at a point 2,600 feet east of main breakwater (prolonged) and parallel thereto. Project modified by omitting detached breakwater and defining depth and extent of channel to be dredged. Widening part of present channel for entrance channel and for basin in eastern part of harbor. Deepening east basin to 25 feet and west channel, as far as 8th Ave. West entended to 21 feet. Widening west channel to 750 feet at its westerly end. Deepening portions of East Basin and West Channel to 27 and 21 feet, respectively. BEAVER BAY HARBOR, MINN. (See Section 4 of Text) A combination primarily of rubblemound breakwaters with a steel sheet piling cell at each side of the harbor entry totalling 650 feet in length, and an excavated harbor basin approximately 2 acres in size, and 8 feet deep. 31-58 H. Doc. 1698, 64th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 133, 71st Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 46, 82d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 337, 77th Cong., I1st sess. H. Doc. 165, 86th Cong., 1st sess.' H. Doc. No.446, 78th Cong., 2d sess.' March 3, 1905 Aug. 5, 1886 Aug. 11, 1888 Mar. 3, 1899 June 6, 1900 Aug. 8, 1917 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 July 14, 1960 Mar. 2, 1945 DETROIT, MICH., DISTRICT TABLE 31-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 2, 1945 H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess.' BIG BAY HARBOR, MICHIGAN (See Section 5 of Text) Provides for converging piers extending from shore, an entrance channel between piers and a rectangular harbor basin. Project depths are 12 feet in entrance channel and 10 feet in harbor basin. BLACK RIVER (PORT HURON), MICH.(See section 6 of Text) Channel from Mouth of Grand Trunk R.R. Bridge. Channel from Grand Trunk R.R. Bridge to Washington Ave. Consolidation of Projects for Black River at Port Huron and Mouth of Black River. Settling Basin. Deepening Channel and Settling Basin to 20 Feet, and Widening to 100 Feet 2 Bends; 1 at the Foot of 12th St., the Other Below the Grand Trunk R.R. Bridge. Extension of Existing Channel. BOLLES HARBOR, MICH. (See Section 7 of Text) Entrance Channel in Lake Erie, Access Channel in LaPlaisance Creek, Steel Sheet Pile Revetment. CASEVILLE HARBOR, MICH. (See Section 8 of Text) Channel 10 to 8 Feet Deep Protected by Breakwater. CEDAR RIVER HARBOR, MICH. (See Section 9 of Text) Dredge an entrance channel (datum at 580.69 feet above mean tide at New York) and construct two parallel piers extending lakeward from mouth of Cedar River. Modification of project to provide for two parallel entrance piers including a new rubble-mound east pier with a sport fishing walkway; an entrance channel from Green Bay to mouth of Cedar River; and a turning basin. CHARLEVOIX HARBOR, MICH. (See Section 10 of Text) Channel from Lake Michigan to Round Lake Protected Where needed by Piers and Revetments. Channel from Round Lake to Lake Charlevoix. Project Depth Increased to 15 Feet. Project Depth Increased to 18 Feet. Project Depth Increases to 24 and 23 Feet, and Construction of Revetment Upstream of Highway Bridge. S. Ex. Doc. 16, 44th Cong., 1st Sess., and Annual Report 1876, p. 523 No Prior Survey of Estimates. No Prior Survey of Estimates. S. Doc. 163, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess.1 Section 107, 1960 River and Harbor Act. 31-59 Annual Report 1889, p. 2291 No Printed Report H. Doc. 436, 64th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Dec. 162, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Dec. 54, 72d Cong., 2d Sess. Section 107, 1960 River and Harbor Act. Section 107,1960 River and Harbor Act. H. Doc. 64th Cong., 1st Sess.1 S. Ex. Doc. 12, 47th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 248, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. 2 Sept. 19, 1890 July 13, 1892 Sept. 22, 1922 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 April 23, 1970 July 6, 1965 Oct. 23, 1962 Aug. 2, 1882 Oct 28, 1965 Aug. 14, 1876 Aug. 2, 1882 June 13, 1902 June 20, 1938 Mar. 29, 1977 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 31-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents June 3, 1896 Mar. 2, 1907 Aug. 26, 1937 May 17, 1950 Oct. 21, 1964 Aug. 5, 1886 July 19, 1963 Aug. 26, 1937 Sept. 3, 1954 Nov. 7, 1966 June 3, 1969 June 13, 1902 Mar. 3, 1905 June 25, 1910 Mar. 4, 1913 Mar. 2, 1907 June 25, 1910 Mar. 2, 1910 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 19353 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 July 24, 1946 CHEBOYGAN HARBOR, MICH. (See Section 11 of Text) 18%2 Foot Channel. 81% Foot Channel. Turning Basin. 21 Foot Channel to East 1st St., Enlarge Turning Basin Deepen to 21 Feet. Breakwater. CLINTON RIVER, MICH. (See Section 12 of Text) Channel in River and Lake St. Clair, Pile Dike, Closing Channels and Making Cutoff, and Revetments as Needed. Widening Entrance Channel and Constructing Protected Harbor Basin. CORNUCOPIA HARBOR, WIS. (See Section 13 of Text) Entrance channel 50 feet wide and 10 feet deep between existing piers from bay to a turning basin 200 feet long, 8 feet deep, with Maximum width of 180 feet, with 150 and 300-foot inner channels each 50 feet wide and 8 feet deep. Reconstruction and Federal maintenance of east and west entrance piers, a 25-foot extension of west pier and a 300-foot extension of existing westerly inner channel at a depth of 8 feet and a width of 50 feet. CROSS VILLAGE HARBOR, MICH. (See Section 14 of Text) Breakwaters with entrance channel and maneuver area. DETOUR HARBOR, MICH. (See Section 15 of Text) Small boat harbor and harbor of refuge, 10 foot channel, 8 foot deep access channel protected by 1,000 foot breakwater. DETROIT RIVER, MICH. (See Section 16 of Text) Amherstburg Channel and Removal of Grosse Ile Shoal. Fighting Island Channel. Livingstone Channel. Channel Depths of 26 and 25 Feet. Channel to Wyandotte 21 Feet Deep and 300 Feet Wide Through Middle Ground Opposite Head of Fighting Island. Trenton Channel and Turning Basin (West of Grosse Ile). American Channel North of Belle Isle Between Windmill Point and Fairway Slip, Detroit. Deepen Westerly 300 Feet of Amherstburg Channel and Ballards Reef Channel Below Livingstone Channel to 27 Feet to Provide Depths Adequate for 24-Foot Draft Navigation When Governing 31-60 Annual Report, 1895, p. 2823 H. Doc. 357, 59th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 134, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 269, 81st Cong., 1st Sess.1 Section 107, 1960 River and Harbor Act. S. Doc. 199, 46th Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Report 1880, p. 2062 and H. Doc. 210, 44th Cong., 2d Sess. and Annual Report 1886, P. 219 Section 107, 1960 River and Harbor Act. S. Committee, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 434, 83rd Cong., 2d Sess.' H. Doc. 490, 89th Cong., 2d Sess. Section 107, 1960 River and Harbor Act. H. Doc. 712, 56th Cong., 1st Sess. and 40, 58th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 17, 62d Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 266, 59th Cong., 2nd Sess. 676, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. and 32, 65th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 253, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 1, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 205, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 734, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 335, 80th Cong., 1st Sess. TABLE 31-B (Continued) DETROIT, MICH., DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents May 17, 19504 Mar. 21, 1956 July 14, 1960 Aug. 13, 1968 June 3, 1896 June 13, 1902 Mar. 2, 1907 May 28, 19086 July 27, 1916 Mar. 2, 1919 Jan. 21, 1927 July 30, 19303 Aug. 30, 19303 Lakes are at Datum, with Necessary Widening at Approaches and Bends and Construction of Necessary Compensating Works. Detroit River. Extend Turning Basin in Trenton Channel 600 Feet. Dredge Through East Draw of Lower Grosse Ile Bridge, and Extend 300-Foot Width of Channel North of Lower Grosse Ile Bridge. Channel Depth of 28.5 Feet Throughout Downbound and Two-Way Channels, Except in Upper (27.7-Foot Depth) and Lower, (29-Foot Depth) Livingstone Channel, and in Upbound Channel; 27-Foot Depth in Ballards Reef Channel Below Junction with Livingstone Channel. 27.5-Foot Depth in Westerly 300-Foot Width of Limekiln Crossing and Amherstburg Reaches, and 28.5- Foot Depth in Westerly 300-Foot Width of Hackett Beach, with Necessary Compensation Works. Also 28.5-Foot Depth in Lake Erie from Detroit River to Pelee Passage Shoal. Inclusive. Trenton Channel; Deepen to 27 Feet, Where Necessary, Wyandotte Reach from Detroit River to Upper Grosse Ile Bridge, About 5.5 Miles, Deepen to 28 Feet and Widen to 300 Feet Below Upper Grosse Ile Bridge to and Including a Turning Basin 28 Feet Deep and 15 Across in Area Outside Project Limits. Trenton Channel: Deepen to 28 Feet and Widen to 300 Feet from the Upper Turning Basin at Trenton to Gibraltar, about 20,500 Feet Downstream: Construct a Turning Basin at Gibraltar at a Depth of 28 Feet. Width of 830 Feet, and Length of 1,500 Feet: Build Compensating Works to Maintain Water Levels. DULUTH-SUPERIOR HARBOR, MINN. AND WIS. (See Section 17 of Text) Dredging. Rebuilding piers at Superior Entry. Enlarge plan for Superior Entry and additional dredging near draw span of Burlington Northern railway bridge. Dredging additional area for basin inside Duluth entrance to 22- foot depth. Enlarging Superior Harbor Basin. Removal of shoal point at southerly end of East Gate Basin. Howards Bay Channel, 20 feet deep. Deepening and widening channels and basins. 31-61 S. Doc. 30, 81st Cong., 1st Sess.1 S. Doc. 71, 84th Cong., 1st Sess.1 H. Doc. 319, 86th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 338,90th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Ex. Doc. 59, 53d Cong., 3d Sess. and Annual Report, 1895, p. 2538. H. Doc. 82, 59th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 221, 60th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 651, 64th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 1018, 64th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 145, 69th Cong., 1st Sess. and Rivers and Harbors Committee, Doc. 32, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 482, 72d Cong., 2d Sess. REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 31-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents July 16, 19526 July 14, 19607 Oct. 4, 1961 Aug. 5, 1886 Sept. 19, 1890 June 3, 1896 June 3, 1896 June 13, 1902 Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 3, 19258 June 26, 19349 July 3, 195810 June 23, 186611 Mar. 3, 1925 Aug. 26, 1937 Oct. 27, 1965 June 23, 1866 June 14, 1880 Sept. 19, 1890 July 13, 1892 July 3, 1930 Deepen Superior Front Channel and a portion of East Gate Basin to 25 feet. Present project dimensions of channels and basin. Abandons northerly portion of 21st Avenue West Channel. FOX RIVER, WIS. (See Section 18 of Text) Improvement of Fox River Dredging Fond du Lac Harbor on Lake Winnebago. Improvement of Wolf River Improvement of Stockbridge, of Calumet and Miller Bay, and of Brothertown Harbor, on Lake Winnebago. Increased depth in rock cuts on lower river, widen Neenah Channel, and a concrete retaining wall at Kaukauna. Operation and care of locks and dams provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors. Sec. 108. That Federal project structure, appurtenances, and real property of Upper Fox River, Wis., be disposed of to State of Wisconsin. FRANKFORT HARBOR, MICH. (See Section 19 of Text) A New Outlet 12 Feet Deep Protected by Piers and Revetments. Exterior Breakwaters, Removal of Portions of Piers, Project Dimensions of Outer Basin. Dredge the Area in Lake Betsie Deepen Approach and Entrance Channels, Extend Inner Basin, and Dredge Recreational Anchorage Area. GRAND HAVEN HARBOR, MICH. (See Section 20 of Text) Piers and Revetments. Piers and Revetments. Piers and Revetments. Piers and Revetments. Present Project Dimensions of Harbor Channel to Grand Trunk Car Ferry Slip and River Channel, Eliminating all of that portion of Grand River Above Bass River, Consolidation of Projects for Harbor and River. H. Doc. 374, 82d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 150, 86th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 196, 86th Cong., 1st Sess. Annual Report, 1885, pp. 2041-2045 [plan of a board approach Dec. 10, 1884, as modified by Corps of Engineers, May 14, 1886]. H. Ex. Doc. 24, 51st Cong. 1st Sess. Annual Report, 1890, p. 2390. No prior survey or estimates. No prior survey or estimates. No prior survey or estimates. H. Doc. 294, 68th Cong., 1st Sess.' S. Doc. 3910, 85th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 482, 55th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 208, 68th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 511, 74th Cong., 2d Sess. S. Doc. 16, 89th Cong., 1st Sess.' S. Ex. Doc. 42, 35th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Ex. Doc. 42, 35th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Ex. Doc. 42, 35th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Ex. Doc. 42, 35th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 88, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. 31-62 TABLE 31-B (Continued) DETROIT, MICH., DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Channel to Spring Lake Present Project Dimensions of Harbor Channel from Car Ferry Slip to Grand Trunk Railway Bridge and Turning Basin GRAND MARAIS HARBOR, MINN. (See Section 21 of Text) Breakwaters and dredging of anchorage area of 26 acres to 16 feet. Sea walls across ledge in southeast corner of harbor, enlarging anchorage basin and deepening of entrance. Small-boat basin with breakwater. Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 3, 1879 Aug. 30, 1935 May 17, 1950 Mar. 2, 1945 GREEN BAY HARBOR WIS. (See Section 23 of Text) Outer Channel and revetment at Grassy Islands. 12 Inner channel.12 Turning basin at DePere. Maintenance of turning basin at DePere. Increasing depth of inner channel and turning basin to 18 feet. Deepen outer channel to 22 feet with widening and straightening inside of Tail Point Bend, widen channel in Fox River through city of Green Bay to 22 feet. Turning basin above Chicago & North Western Ry. Bridge. Turning basin at mouth of East River. Deepen and widen 9 miles of entrance channel to 26 by 500 feet; 3.6 miles of entrance channel to 24 by 300 feet; and 3.2 miles of existing Fox River to 24 feet deep. HAMMOND BAY HARBOR, MICH. (See Section 24 of Text) Harbor of Refuge, breakwaters 10-foot depth in harbor basin 12-foot depth in entrance channel. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 3d Sess.1 H. Doc. 661, 76th Cong., 3d Sess.1 H. Ex. Doc. 75, 43d Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Report, 1875, p. 184. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 22, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 187, 81st Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Report, 1867, p. 70. Unpublished report approved Aug. 3, 1892. H. Doc. 222, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 1017, 64th Cong., Sess. H. Doc. 294, 68th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 40, 72d Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 73, 74th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 95, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 470, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess. 31-63 GRAND TRAVERSE BAY HARBOR, MICH (See Section 22 of Text) Two Parallel piers, and entrance channel between piers and a harbor basin. Project depths are 12 feet between piers and 10 feet in basin. Project area extended 200 feet upstream in 1966. June 23, 1866 July 13, 1892 June 26, 1910 Aug. 8, 1917 Mar. 3, 1925 Aug. 30, 19353 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Oct. 23, 1962 Mar. 2, 1945 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 31-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 3, 1871 Jan. 21, 1927 Mar. 2, 1945 HARBOR BEACH, LAKE HURON, MICH. (See Section 25 of Text) Adopted Site and made provision for harbor. Closing North Entrance and Dredging Main Entrance and Anchorage Area. Removal of Portion of Breakwater in interest of sanitation. HARRISVILLE HARBOR, MICH. (See Section 26 of Text) Harbor of Refuge, Breakwaters, 12-Foot depth entrance channel 10-Foot depth in harbor basin. HOLLAND HARBOR, MICH. (See Section 27 of Text) Artificial Channel Between Lakes Macatawa and Michigan.12 Piers and Revetments. 12 Extending Inner Piers. Converging Breakwater. Channel to Holland and Turning Basin at Holland. Present Project Dimensions of Channels and Turning Basin. Widen Bend in Reveted Entrance Channel into Lake Macatawa, Dredge Channel in Black River, and Widen and Extend Turning Basin. THE INLAND ROUTE, MICH. (See Section 28 of Text) Channel 30 Feet Wide and 5 Feet Deep Through Lakes and Rivers with Suitable Jetties. Lock and Dam. KENOSHA HARBOR, WIS. (See Section 29 of Text) Parallel piers and 600 feet of breakwater.12 Extending breakwater 200 feet. Present project dimensions of entrance channel and basin. Channel northwesterly from basin. Deepen lake approach channel to 27 feet and 800 feet wide; deepen approach channel to 26 feet, entrance channel and inner basin to 25 feet. KEWAUNEE HARBOR, WIS. (See Section 30 of Text) Entrance piers. Turning basin. 31-64 Annual Report 1873, p. 292 H. Doc. 1700, 64th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess. S. Ex. Doc. 42, 35th Cong., 1st Sess., Annual Report. Annual Report 1866, p. 106. H. Doc. 272, 51st Cong., 2d Sess., and Annual Report 1887, p. 2950. Annual Report 1905, p. 2176. H. Doc. 588, 69th Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee, Doc. 48, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 282, 83rd Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 142, 82nd Cong., 1st Sess.1 Chief of Engineers. H. Doc. 328, 54th Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Report, 1897, p. 2772, H. Doc. 164, 55th Cong., 3d Sess. Annual Report, 1899, p. 1817. H. Doc. 62, 59th Cong., 2d Sess. and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 3, 59th Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 19, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 750, 80th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 496, 87th Cong., 2d Sess.1 Annual Report, 1881, p. 2082. H. Doc. 324, 60th Cong., 1st Sess. Aug. 30, 1852 Mar. 2, 1867 Mar. 3, 1899 Mar. 3, 1905 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Sept. 3, 1954 Sept. 3, 1954 Sept. 2, 1964 Mar. 3, 1899 Mar. 2, 1907 Aug. 30, 19352 May 17, 1950 Oct. 23, 1962 Mar. 3, 1881 June 25, 1910 TABLE 31-B (Continued) DETROIT, MICH., DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Aug. 30, 19352, 14 July 14, 1960 Sept. 19, 1890 June 25, 1910 Mar. 2, 1919 Aug. 30, 193615 Mar. 2, 1945 Sept. 3, 1954 Mar. 7, 1974 North breakwater, remove old north pier, widen and deepen entrance channel and turning basin to 20 feet and remove outer south shoal. Enlarge existing turning basin, extend existing project into north basin, and increase depth of north basin to 20 feet at a maximum width of 500 feet and eliminate removal of outer shoal. KEWEENAW WATERWAY, MICH. (See Section 31 of Text) Acquisition of waterway; for a 16-foot channel of 70-foot bottom width, renew canal revetments, reconstruct and extend piers at upper entrance to 30-foot depth of water, and at proper time for increase of channel depth to 20 feet with bottom width of not less than 120 feet (increase in width and depth of channel approved Mar. 15, 1898). Anchorage basin just within lower entrance about one-half mile long, 800 feet wide; a mooring pier on its westerly side 2,000 feet in length, and for purchase of necessary land. Princess Point Cutoff channel. General deepening, widening and straightening of channels and basins to provide 25-foot depth with additional overdepth at entrances, extend lower entrance breakwater, and necessary alteration or replacement of structures due to deepening channels. KNIFE RIVER HARBOR, MINN. (See Section 32 of Text) Dredging. Breakwater and modified channels. Construction of measures to correct the design deficiencies which results in unsatisfactory entrance and mooring conditions. LA POINTE HARBOR, WIS. (See Section 33 of Text) Provides for reconstruction of 73.5 feet of the existing breakwater, extending the breakwater 126.24 feet with 5 new steel sheet pile cells, harbor dredging and related work. The harbor is 10 feet deep in the entrance and 8 feet deep in the basin. Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act. P.L. 645, 86th Cong., as amended. 31-65 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 43, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 19, 86th Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Ex. Doc. 105 49th Cong., 2d Sess. and Annual Report 1887, p. 1977. H. Doc. 325, 60th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 835, 63rd Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 55, 73rd Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 686, 77th Cong., 2d Sess. and Annual Report for 1949. H. Doc. 463, 83d Cong., 2d Sess.' REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 31-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Aug. 5, 1886 July 13, 1892 June 13, 1902 Mar. 2, 1919 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 19333 Mar. 21, 1956 Aug. 30, 1935 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 27, 1965 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1867 Mar. 3, 1899 Mar. 2, 1907 Dec. 31, 1970 Mar. 2, 1945 LAKE ST. CLAIR, MICH., CHANNELS(See Section 34 of Text) Two Dikes. Deepening Canal and Dredging Channel at Grosse Point. Second Canal for Downbound Vessels. 21-Foot Depth in Grosse Pointe Channel for About 5.25 miles. 25-Foot Depth Through Canals and Channel Through Lake St. Clair. Removal of Center Dike and Widening Channel to 700 Feet. Deepening Channel to 27.5 Feet and Abandonment of Channel above Mouth of Southeast Bend Cutoff Channel. LELAND HARBOR, MICH. (See Section 35 of Text) Entrance Channel Protected by Piers. Outer Breakwater, Anchorage Area. Approach Channel and Removal of North Pier. LEXINGTON HARBOR, MICH. (See Section 36 of Text) Approach Channel and Maneuver Area Protected by Breakwaters.' LITTLE LAKE HARBOR, MICH. (See Section 37 of Text) 12-Foot Deep Channel From Lake Superior into' Little Lake Breakwaters and Revetments. LUDINGTON HARBOR, MICH. (See Section 38 of Text) Entrance Piers. Pier Extension Reconstruction and Repairs to Existing Structures and Present Project Dimensions of Channel. Breakwaters, Shore Connections, and Removal of Outer Ends of the Two Inner piers. Deepen Channels and Widen Opening Between Breakwaters. LUTSEN HARBOR, MINN. (See Section 39 of Text) Project as modified provides for two rubblemound breakwaters totalling 1,400 feet, with an excavated harbor basin approximately 2 acres with an 8-foot depth. 31-66 Annual Report 1885, p. 2150. H. Doc. 297, 51st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 234, 56th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 188, 65th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 253, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 3, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 71, 84th Cong., 1st Sess.' Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 23, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 413, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 301, 88th Cong., 2d Sess.' H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess.' Annual Report 1867, p. 11416 H. Doc. 273, 54th Cong., 2d Sess. and Annual Report 1897, p. 2951. H. Doc. 62, 59th Cong., 1st Sess., and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 3, 59th Cong., 2d Sess. 16 H. Doc. 342, 91st Cong., 2d Sess.' Annual Report 1945, River and Harbor Act, p. 1658. H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess., contains latest published map.' TABLE 31-B (Continued) DETROIT, MICH., DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 2, 1867 Sept. 19, 1890 July 25, 1912 July 3, 1920 Mar. 2, 1945 July 14, 1960 Mar. 3, 1905 Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 2, 1907 Aug. 30, 193517 Aug. 26, 1937 Oct. 23, 1962 Dec. 31, 1968 Sec. 107 July 14, 1960 Mar. 3, 1871 June 13, 1902 Mar. 4, 1913 July 3, 1930 MANISTEE HARBOR, MICH. (See Section 40 of Text) Entrance Piers. Extending Channel 8,000 Feet to Connect with Manistee Lake, and Further Pier Extension. Depth of 20 Feet in Outer Harbor 570 Feet Wide to Outer End of South Pier 18 Feet Deep in River, South Breakwater with Shore Connection, and Extend North Pier if Required. 23-Foot Depths in Entrance Channel and 21-Foot Depths in River Channel. Remove Old South Revetment, Construct New South Pier and Revetment, and Widen River Entrance Channel. Present Project Dimensions of Channel Through Outer Basin and River and Federal Participation in Cost of Replacing Maple Street Bridge. MANISTIQUE HARBOR, MICH. (See Section 41 of Text) Breakwaters and Outer Harbor. Present Location of West Breakwater and Pier at River Mouth. MANITOWOC HARBOR, WIS. (See Section 42 of Text) Breakwaters. Present project dimensions of channel through outer basin, removal of old north stub pier, and approach channel to a proposed city terminal south of shore end of south breakwater. Channel in river. Deepen Lake approach to 25 feet by 800 feet wide, deepen outer harbor to 25 feet, river channel to 23 feet to 8th St., and Upper River Channel to 22 feet to Soo Line R.R. Dredge River Channel to 12 feet from Soo Line R.R. 720 feet upstream. MENOMINEE HARBOR AND RIVER, MICH. AND WIS. (See Section 43 of Text) Entrance piers. Consolidation of project for harbor and river, and a channel 18 feet deep. Partial restoration of work above bridge which had been eliminated by act of May 3, 1905. 20-foot depth in channel and 18-foot depth in turning basin. Annual Report 1867, p. 115. Annual Report 1891, p. 2678. H. Doc. 599, 62d Cong., 2d Sess. S. Doc. 131, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 380, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 358, 86th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 429, 58th Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Report 1908, p. 648, and Unpublishes Report of Mar. 13, 1908. Approved by Secretary of War, Arr. 3, 1908. H. Doc. 62, 59th Cong., 1st Sess., as modified by Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 3, 59th Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 39, 73d Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 80, 74th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 479, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. Detailed Project Report June 1967.' Annual Report, 1867, P. 132. H. Doc. 419, 56th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 171, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. 31-67 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 31-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 July 14, 1960 June 27, 1967 Sec. 107 Aug. 30, 1852 Mar. 3, 1883 Mar. 2, 1907 Sept. 22, 1922 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 194518 July 14, 1960 Oct. 23, 1962 Feb. 24, 18351's July 3, 1930 ,uly 14, 193221 June 13, 1902 Mar. 3, 1925 Aug. 30, 1935 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 21-foot depth in channel and turning basin and enlarge turning basin. Extend channel 12 feet deep to vicinity of Marinette Yacht Club. Deepen existing approach channel to 26 feet, entrance and river channels to 24 feet and enlarge turning basin. Deepen 1,100 feet of river channel generally north of Marinette Corp. facilities to 19 feet. MILWAUKEE HARBOR, WIS. (See Section 44 of Text) North nier. 12 Inner 7,600 feet of breakwater. 12 South pier. Extending north breakwater 1,000 feet. Extend north breakwater; a south breakwater; present project dimensions of inner entrance channel. Dredging a portion of outer harbor to 21-foot depth. Dredging river channels to 21-foot depth. Deepen South Menominee and Burnham Canals to 21 feet. Deepen an approach channel to 30 feet by 800 feet wide and 300 feet wide through breakwater; deepen entrance channel 28 feet through piers, outer harbor to 28 feet south of entrance channel, and a channel to 27 feet in Milwaukee River to Buffalo St., and in Kinnickinnic River to Chicago & North Western Ry. bridges. MONROE HARBOR, MICH. (See Section 45 of Text) 9-Foot Channel, Protecting Revetments and Piers. 21-Foot Channel, Dikes and Turning Basin. 20 Modified Conditions of Local Cooperation Imposed by Act of July 3, 1930 MUSKEGON HARBOR, MICH. (See Section 46 of Text) Piers and Revetments. Breakwaters. Repairing Revetments Around Car Ferry Slip. Channel Deepening and Present Project Dimensions of Channel. Piers and Revetments. NEW BUFFALO HARBOR, MICH. (See Section 47 of Text) Entrance channel 10 feet deep by 80 to 180 feet wide and 850 feet long to mouth of Galien River, new no. and so. breakwaters 1,305 and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 28, 73d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 228, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 112, 86th Cong., 1st Sess. Detailed Project Report Dec. 1960.1 S. Doc. 175, 25th Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Report 1881, p. 2122. Annual Report 1906, p. 1752. [No prior survey or estimate affecting breakwater extensions.] H. Doc. 804, 66th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 289, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 29, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 285, 86th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 134, 87th Cong., 1st Sess.' Annual Report 1872, p. 237. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 22, 71st Cong., 1st Sess., 45, Rivers and Harbor Committee Doc. 12, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. 45, 75th Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 104, 56th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 494, 67th Cong., 4th Sess. Rivers and Harbor Committee Doc. 64, 75th Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 474, 87th Cong., 2d Sess.' H. Doc. 474, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. 31-68 TABLE 31-B (Continued) DETROIT, MICH., DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents 740 feet, respectively, deepening inner channel to Galien River to 8 feet and 80 feet wide and 1,250 feet long. ONTONAGON HARBOR, MICH. (See Section 48 of Text) Channel 17 feet deep and 150 feet wide through bar and 15 feet deep and 100 feet wide between piers, and pier maintenance. Modified project widths and provide inner basin. PENTWATER HARBOR, MICH. (See Section 49 of Text) Piers and Revetments, Dredging. Piers and Revetments, Dredging. Piers and Revetments, Dredging. Piers and Revetments, Dredging. Present Project Depth of Channel POINT LOOKOUT HARBOR (AU GRES RIVER), MICH. (See Section 50 of Text) Breakwater, Anchorage Area, Channel Dredging. PORTAGE LAKE HARBOR, MICH. (See Section 51 of Text) Entrance Channel 18 Feet Deep Protected by Piers and Revetments. PORT SANILAC HARBOR, MICH. (See Section 52 of Text) Entrance Channel 12 Feet Deep, Anchorage Basin, Breakwater. PORT WASHINGTON HARBOR, WIS. (See Section 53 of Text) North pier and south basin. 12 H. Doc. 602, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. S. Committee print, 74th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Ex. Doc. 70, 39th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Ex. Doc. 70, 39th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Ex. Doc. 70, 39th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Ex. Doc. 70, 39th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 181, 39th Cong., 2d Sess.' H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. Annual Report 1879, p. 163422 H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Ex. Doc. 28, 41st Cong., 2d Sess., and Annual Report, 1879, p. 119. Aug. 14, 1876 Aug. 30, 193523 July 3, 195824 North basin. North breakwater, removal of 650 feet of north pier, outer turning basin, present project dimensions of channel and basin and extension of south breakwater. Extending and raising of north breakwater and placing rubble along sides; removing 456 feet of south breakwater and dredging in outer basin. Annual Report, 1876, pt. 2, p. 379. H. Doc. 168, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 41, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 446, 83d Cong., 2d Sess. 31-69 June 25, 1910 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1867 Mar. 3, 1873 July 5, 1881 July 13, 1892 Mar. 25, 1907 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 3, 1879 Mar. 2, 1945 July 11, 1870 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 31-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents June 3, 1896 June 13, 1902 Aug. 30, 1935 July 14, 1960 Mar. 2, 1907 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Aug. 8, 1917 Aug. 30, 19352, 26, 27 July 3, 19582 Oct. 23, 19622 June 25, 1910 July 3, 1930 Aug. 26, 1937 June 20, 1938 Sept. 3, 1954 PRESQUE ISLE HARBOR, MICH. (See Section 54 of Text) Breakwater, 1,000 feet long. Shore extension, 216 feet long. For dredging and rubble mound extension to breakwater 1,600 feet long. Changed designation of project. Deepening harbor from 26 and 28 feet to 28 and 30 feet, respectively. RACINE HARBOR, WIS. (See Section 55 of Text) Breakwaters. Remove shoals lakeward of harbor entrance, enlarge 19-foot channel through outer basin and 19-foot channel in river. Present project dimensions of channel through outer basin and in river. ROUGE RIVER, MICH.(See Section 56 of Text) 21-Foot Channel via The Shortcut Canal. 25-Foot Channel at Mouth of Old Channel, 1,425 Feet Long and Adjacent to Latter, and 21-Foot Channel Extending from Junction of Old Channel and Shortcut Canal into Old Channel to Detroit, Toledo & Ironton R.R. Bridge. Old Channel; 100 Feet Wide from Peerless Cement Corp. to Junction with Shortcut Canal Widened to 150 Feet at 2 Bends. 25-Foot Channel Over Modified Limits from Detroit River to Jefferson Ave. (via Shortcut Canal). SAGINAW RIVER, MICH. (See Section 57 of Text) Channel 200 Feet Wide, with Depth of 18.5 Feet in Bay and 16.5 Feet in River. Project Depth of 18.5 Feet Extended Up River to Saginaw Turning Basin. Present Project Channel Dimensions from Bay to Sixth Street Bridge in Saginaw. New Channel in Bay, 350 Feet Wide and 24 Feet Deep from 24-Foot Contour to River Mouth, Project Depth of 24 Feet in River Channel Up to Detroit & Mackinac Railway Bridge, Project Depth of 22 Feet in River Channel Up to Sixth Street Bridge, Turning Basins at Essexville and Carrollton, and Elimination of Present Channel in Bay. H. Doc. 318, 54th Cong., 1st Sess., Annual Report for 1903, pp. 474, 1823. H. Doc. 473, 72d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 145, 86th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 62, 59th Cong., 1st Sess., and Annual Report 1909, p. 1973. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 46, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 816, 77th Cong., 2d and H. Doc. 255, 78th Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 1063, 64th Cong., 2nd Sess.25 H. Doc. 125, 85th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 509, 87th Cong., 2d Sess.' H. Doc. 740, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 30, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 21, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 576, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 500, 83rd Cong., 2d Sess. 31-70 TABLE 31-B (Continued) DETROIT, MICH., DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 27, 1965 July 13, 1892 July 8, 1930 Mar. 2, 1945 July 24, 1946 Mar. 21, 1956 Mar. 3, 1875 June 14, 1880 Mar. 3, 1899 Aug. 30, 1935 June 2, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 July 3, 1958 July 11, 1870 Deepen Bay Channel, Deepen River Channel to Detroit & Mackinac Bridge, Extend 22-Foot Project Above 6th St. Bridge, Deepen Essexville Turning Basin, and Construct 2 New Turning Basin.3 Deepen River Channel to 25 Feet, from Detroit & Mackinac Bridge to New York Central Railroad Bridge. ST. CLAIR RIVER, MICH. (See Section 58 of Text) 20-Foot Channel in the River. Deepen Channel to 25 and 26 Feet, and Compensating Works. Widening Channel at Southeast Bend to 700 Feet. Widen and Deepen Southeast Bend and Improve Outlet of North Channel, St. Clair River. Deepen and Further Improve Channels in St. Clair River Between Limits of 27.1 to 30 Feet to Provide Safe Navigation by Vessels with Drafts of 25.5 Feet. A Cutoff Channel in Canada of Southeast Bend and Abandon Old Southeast Bend Channels. ST. JOSEPH HARBOR, MICH. (See Section 59 of Text) Interior Revetments.28 Benton Harbor Canal.28 Present Project Dimensions of Piers and a Turning Basin. Present Project Dimensions of Paw Paw River. Abandon Easterly 1,000 Feet of Channel Above West Line of 9th St. Turning Basin Above Mouth of Morrison Channel and Eliminate Turning Basin Near Mouth of Paw Paw River. Maintenance of Turning Basin Near Mouth of Paw Paw River. ST. MARYS RIVER, MICH. (See Section 60 of Text) Weitzel Lock (Replaced in 1943 by Mac Arthur Lock), Widen and Deepen Existing State Channel.2 31-71 H. Doc. 554, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 240, 89th Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 207, 51st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 253, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 309, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 335, 80th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 71, 84th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Ex. Doc. 160, 43rd Cong., 2d Sess., and Annual Report 1875, pt. 1, p. 162. Annual Report 1880, pp. 2030, 2031 and 2049, 2055. H. Doc. 307, 55th Cong., 2d Sess., and Annual Report 1898, p. 2496. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 52, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 129, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 95, 84th Cong., 2d Sess.) Report by Maj. O. M. Poe, Corps of Engineers, Not Published. REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 31-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Aug. 5, 1886 July 13, 1892 June 13, 1902 June 13, 1902 Mar. 3, 1907 Mar. 3, 1909 July 25, 1912 Mar. 4, 1915 Sept. 22, 1922 Jan. 21, 1927 July 3, 1930 June 26, 19349 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 7, 1942 June 15, 1943 Mar. 2, 1945 July 24, 1946 Mar. 21, 1956 Poe Lock. 1 Dredging Through Shoals Above Falls and Shoals Below Falls Between Lower End of Canal and Upper Entrance Channel into Lake Nicolet (Formerly Hay Lake). Enlarging the Old Channel. Lake Nicolet and Neebish Channels Work in that Section of River Below Locks. David Lock Second Canal, and Emergency Dam. Lease of Waterpower at Falls. Lease Entered Into with Michigan Northern Power Co. Provided for Construction of Remedial and Compensating Works. Fourth Lock (Renamed 'Sabin' Lock in 1943). Deepen Tailrace of Power Plant. Widen Upper Approach to Canals Through Vidal Shoals, Extend Anchorage and Maneuver Area Below Locks. Remove Round Island, Middle Ground Extension of Northwest Canal Pier, and Widen Channels Middle Neebish Route. Deepen Channels Throughout Downbound Route. Operation and Care of Canal and Locks Provided from War Department Appropriations for Rivers and Harbors. Widen Brush Point Turn and Channel from Brush Point to Point Louise. Construct New (Mac Arthur) Lock on Site of Former Weitzel Lock, Deepen Approach Channels to 27 Feet, and Reconstruct Approach Piers. Name 'Mac Arthur' Lock and Changed Name of 'Fourth' Lock to 'Sabin' Lock. Remove Bridge Island and Construct New Hydroelectric Power Plant. Replace Poe Lock at St. Marys Falls Canal with a New Structure 800 Feet Long, 100 Feet Wide and 32 Feet Deep, with Necessary Construction of Nose and Center Piers, and Widen and Deepen Channel Across Point Iroquois Shoals and in Lake Nicolet to Provide Wider Anchorage and Maneuver Areas in St. Marys River. Deepen to Provide a Project Safe Draft of 25.5 Feet Over Full Width to Downbound and 2-Way Channels (Including Anchorage Areas) and Over Westerly 300-Foot Width of Upbound Middle Neebish Channel, When Levels of Lake Superior and Huron are at Their Respective Low-Water Datum. 31-72 H. Ex. Doc. 72, 49th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Ex. Doc. 207, 51st Cong., 2d Sess., and Annual Report 1891, p. 2810 H. Doc. 138, 56th Cong., 2d Sess., and 215, 58th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 128, 56th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 333, 59th Cong., 2d Sess. (Plan 3) H. Doc. 65, 62d Cong., 1st Sess. District Engineer Report, Oct. 29, 1920. H. Doc. 270, 69th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 253, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. River and Harbor Committee Doc. 53, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 218, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 679, 78th Cong., 2d Sess. and 11. Doc. 339, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 335, 80th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 71, 84th Cong., 1st Sess.' TABLE 31-B (Continued) DETROIT, MICH., DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Repeal Authorization of Bridge as a Part of Project, Authorize Alteration With Cost to be Apportioned by Sec. 6, Truman Hobbs Act, June 21, 1940. SAUGATUCK HARBOR AND KALAMAZOO RIVER, MICH. (See Section 61 of Text) Entrance Channel, Piers and Revetments. Deepening Entrance to 16 Feet. Deepening Channel in River to 14 Feet. SAXON HARBOR, MINN. (See Section 62 of Text) Provides for east and west breakwaters, an outer channel 10 feet deep, an inner basin and side channel 8 feet deep, and diversion of Oronto Creek to Parkers Creek by three short reaches of channel excavation and a levee. SEBEWAING RIVER, MICH. (See Section 63 of Text) Entrance Channel 8 Feet Deep, 100 Feet Wide and 15,000 Feet Long in Saginaw Bay. SHEBOYGAN HARBOR, WIS. (See Section 64 of Text) North breakwater. Preserving south pier as part of project, providing turning basin, and elimination of proposed south breakwaters. Present project dimensions of channel. Widen and deepen outer harbor entrance channel to 450 feet, widen and deepen river channel from present project limit to north side of Jefferson Ave. SOUTH HAVEN HARBOR, MICH. (See Section 65 of Text) Channel from Inner End of Piers to Highway Bridge. 12 Present Dimensions of Piers and for a Turning Basin. Present Project Dimensions of Channel and Turning Basin STURGEON BAY AND LAKE MICHIGAN SHIP CANAL, WIS. (See Section 66 of Text) Breakwaters."1 Acquisition of the canal. H. Doc. 912, 54th Cong., 1st Sess. Annual Report 1896, Vol. 2. Pt. 5, p. 2739 Annual Report 1907, P. 6416 H. Doc. 635, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. River and Harbor Act H. Doc. 169, 85th Cong., 1st Sess., contains latest published map. Annual Report for 1965, p. 1023 H. Doc. 71, 54th Cong., 1st Sess. June 3, 1896 Mar. 2, 1907 June 25, 1910 July 3, 1958 June 3, 1896 Mar. 2, 1907 Jan. 21, 1927 Aug. 30, 1935 Sept. 3, 1954 No Prior Survey or Estimate. H. Doc. 119, 58th Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 9, 73d Cong., 1st Sess.' and Unpublished review Report of Chief of Engineers, Dated Dec. 21, 1934. H. Ex. Doc. 34, 42d Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Report, 1872, p. 171. H. Ex. Doc. 106, 49th Cong., 2d Sess. 31-73 July 9, 1956 None H. Doc. 62, 59th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 475, 68th Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 47, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 554, 82d Cong., 2d Sess.' Aug. 11, 1888 Mar. 3, 1905 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 3, 1873 July 13, 1892 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 31-B (Continued AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Aug. 5, 1886 Aug. 5, 1886 Aug. 30, 1935 Nov. 7, 1945 July 14, 1960 Mar. 3, 1871 Mar. 2, 1907 Aug. 30, 1935 July 3, 1958 TWO HARBORS, MINN. (See Section 67 of Text) Breakwater and dredging. Construction of two breakwater piers. Shore connection to east breakwater and dredging maneuvering area. Construct new east breakwater and enlargement of maneuvering basin. Deepen harbor project depths from 26 and 28 feet to 28 and 30 feet, respectively. TWO RIVERS HARBOR, WIS. (See Section 68 of Text) South pier, 750 feet of north pier, and about 44 feet of north revetment. 12 Remainder of north pier and stilling basin. Deepening entrance channel and inner basin to 18 feet. Extend existing project in West Twin River to 18 feet deep and in East Twin River to 10 feet deep to 22d Street Bridge. WHITEFISH POINT HARBOR, MICH. (See Section 69 of Text) Breakwaters, Entrance Channel, Anchorage Basin. Breakwater Inside Harbor. RED RUN DRAIN-LOWER CLINTON RIVER, MICH. (See Section 77 of Text) Flood control and major drainage improvements to Red Run Drain and Lower Clinton River. RIVER ROUGE, MICH. (See Section 78 of Text) Channel Enlargement and Straightening, and Alteration or Replacement of Existing Bridges. SAGINAW RIVER, MICH. FLOOD CONTROL (See Section 79 of Text) Flood Control Improvements to Saginaw River and its Tributaries Including Tittabawassee, Shiawassee, Flint, and Cass Rivers. SEBEWAING, SEBEWAING RIVER, MICH. (See Section 80 of Text) Enlarging Present Channel of Sebewaing River, Altering Railroad and Highway Bridges, Removal of Dike. 31-74 H. Ex. Doc. 94, 48th Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Report for 1887, p. 1952. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 17, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 805, 78th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 146, 86th Cong., 1st Sess.' Annual Report, 1871, p. 123 [as modified by Chief of Engineers, Feb. 27, 1897]. H. Doc. 730, 59th Cong., 1st Sess. Modification of Plan A. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 25, 73d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 362, 84th Cong., 2d Sess.' H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess. Chief of Engineers. H. Doc. 431, 91st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 148, 87th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 346, 84th Cong., 2d Sess.' H. Doc. 286, 76th Cong., 1st Sess.' Mar. 2, 1945 Aug. 17, 1967 Dec. 30, 1970 Oct. 23, 1962 July 3, 1958 Aug. 18, 1941 TABLE 31-B (Continued) DETROIT, MICH., DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 1. Contains latest published map. 2. Including Emergency Relief Administration Work authorized May 28, 1935. 3. Included in Public Works Administration Program September 6, 1933. 4. This modification deauthorized 5 August 1977 under Section 12, Public Law 93-251. 5. Administrative Act, Section 4. 6. Public Law 568, 82d Congress. 7. Public Law 388, 87th Congress. 8. This portion inactive. 9. Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. 10. Transfer completed June 1962. 11. Amended 1868, 1879, 1892. 12. Completed under previous project. 13. Included in Public Works Administration Program January 3, 1934. 14. Inactive portion; removal of 200 linear feet of north pier, widening inner 200 feet of channel through outer basin, and closing gap in north shore connection of breakwater. 15. Latest published map is in Annual Report 1914, p.2974. 16. Latest published map in Annual Report 1914, p. 2914. 17. Superceded by Act of October 23, 1962. 18. Uncompleted portion was deauthorized in 1977 (dredging Milwaukee River from Buffalo St. Bridge to North Humboldt Ave. Bridge). 19. Modified by Act of June 10, 1872. 20. Riprapping of protecting dikes portion of project is inactive. 21. War Department Appropriations Act. 22. Latest published map is in House Document 588, 64th Cong., 1st Sess. 23. Work recommended in H. Doc. 588, 64th Cong., 1st Sess. 24. Deauthorized in 1977. 25. Contains latest published maps. See also map with Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 19, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. 26. Except for dredging 25-foot channel to 1,150 feet upstream of mouth in old channel, work authorized in this act is considered inactive. 27. This modification deauthorized 5 August 1977 under Section 12, Public Law 93-251. 28. Completed under previous projects. Public Law 130, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. 31-75 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 31-C FEATURES OF EXISTING PROJECT Project Datum Planes Above Main Above Mean Length Miles Used by Water Level of from Upbound Project Project at Father Channel Mouth or Down- Width Depth Point, Quebec Year Name of Channel (Feet) River Vessels (Feet) (Feet) (Feet) Complete DETROIT RIVER, MICH. (SEE SECTION 16 OF TEXT) Channel North of Belle Isle' 2 2 Channel at Heat of Detroit River Miscellaneous Shoals and Obstructions, Belle Isle to Fighting Island Channel Fighting Island Channel Ballards Reef Channel North of Junction with Livingstone Channel Livingstone Channel Upper Livingstone Channel Lower: CS 260+00 to 368+87 CS 368+87 to 492+00 East Outer Channel Misc., Shoals and Obstructions, Detroit River to Pelee Passage Pelee Passage Shoal Amherstburg Channel: Upper Section, Ballards Reef Channel Middle Section Lower Section, Hackett Range West Outer Channel Trenton Channel: Wyandotte Reach Trenton Reach (Upper) Trenton Reach (Lower) Grosse Ile Shoal .30 38,800 32 44,500 25 Both Both Both 200 800 800 600 24,800 17 Both 12,200 12 Both 26,000 10 Down 10,887 12,313 42,000 6,500 12,000 24,000 21,000 31,500 5,100 600 600 5 Down Both - Both 10 17 14 14 Both Both Up Up Up Down Local Local Local Local 21.0 571.3 28.5 571.5-570.9 - 28.5 570.9-570.3 28.5 28.5 1964 1964 1964 569.8 1962 569.8 1963 450 27.7 569.8-568.6 1964 450,800 800-1,200 1,200 600 600 6000 800 300 300 250-300 29.0 29.0 38.5 28.5-29.53 29.5 27.5 21.27.54 21.28.56 22.0 27.0 28.0 28.0 20.0 568.6 568.6 568.6 1961 1961 1964 568.6 1962 568.6 1964 569.8-569.5 569.5-568.9 568.9-568.6 568.6 569.9-569.7 569.7-569.6 569.6-568.8 569.8 1960 1960 1960 1929 19644 1964 1941 1904 ST. CLAIR RIVER, MICH, (SEE SECTION 58 OF TEXT) Channel at Foot of Lake Huron Channel North of Blue Water Bridge Port Huron to Stag Island Widening at Upper and Lower Ends of Stage Island St. Clair to Russel Island Russel Island to Southeast Bend Southeast Bend CS 324+00 to 250+00 Cutoff Channel North Channel Outlet 26,500 44 Both 4,100 39 Both 38,000 37,600 77,000 20,600 7,400 30,300 8,000 39 31 24 11 Both Both Both Both 5 Both - Both - Small Craft 800 30.0 576.8-576.5 1961 800 30.0 576.4-576.1 1962 800 900-1,000 1,000 700-1,000 700 700 100 30.0 27.4 27.3 17.2 576.4-576.1 574.9-573.8 573.8-572.4 572.4-572.1 27.1 573.1-572.0 27.1 572.1-571.7 10.0 571.7 1961 1962 1962 1962 1962 1962 1962 'This is a Side Channel. 'This is a Side Channel. 2Extends from Deep Water Near Windmill Point to a Point Opposite Fairview Slip, about 3,000 Feet. 'Project Depth 29.5 Feet over Rock Shoals and 28.5 Feet over other than Rock Shoals. 4Project Depth 21 Feet in Easterly 300-Foot Width of Channel and 27.5 Feet in Westerly 300-Foot Width. 'Project Depth 21 Feet in Easterly 300-Foot Width of Channel and 28.5 Feet in Westerly 300-Foot Width. 6Project Complete Except for Work Authorized by River and Harbor Act of 1950. 31-76 DETROIT, MICH., DISTRICT TABLE 31-D ST. MARYS RIVER, MICH.: EXISTING PROJECT (See Section 60 of Text) Lock Davis Sabin MacArthur New Poe Miles Above Mouth 47 47 47 47 Clear Width of Chamber Feet 80 80 80 110 Length Between Gate Quione Feet 1,350 1,350 800 1,200 Lifts Feet 21.7 21.7 21.7 21.7 Depth Over Upper Breast Walls' Feet 24.3 24.3 31 32 Depth Over Lower Breast Walls' Feet 23.1 23.1 31 32 Foundation Rock Rock Rock Rock Type of Construction Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Estimated Cost $6,200,002 $3,275,0003 $12,909,440 $39,000,000 Actual Cost $2,200,0005 $1,750,0006 $12,718,8064, 7 $34,813,066 Completed (Open to Commerce) Oct. 21, 1914 Sept. 18, 1919 July 11, 1943 June 26, 1969 Emergency Dam for South Canal North Canal Miles Above Mouth 47 47 Estimated Cost -9 $300,000 Type Steel Stoplogs Recessed Steel Stoplogs Recessed Into Lock Masonry Into Lock Masonry Cost Completed -9 $169,2248 Year Completed 1943 1922 (Modified 1963) 'At low water datum 599.5 above and 577.8 below. 2Includes Cost of North Canal. 3Includes cost of canal excavations to provide necessary approaches to lock, canal walls, piers, and emergency dam, $662,919. 4Excludes cost of deepening and enlarging South Canal, $1,653,378. 5Excludes cost of North Canal, $2,572,611. 6Excludes cost of canal excavations to provide necessary approaches to lock, canal walls, piers, and emergency dam, $662,919. 7Excluding cost of lower guard gates which were never installed. SIncluding engineering office, and inspection. 9Not separable from cost of locks. Note: Limiting draft to locks is determined by depth over breast walls. 31-77 FOX RIVER, WIS.: LOCKS AND DAMS (See Section 18 of Text) TABLE 31-E Depth At Normal Pool Miles Avail- Lower from Dis- Clear able Breast Miter Character Kind Year Green Nearest tance Width Length Lift Wall' Sill of of Type of Com- Actual Name of Lock and Dam Bay Town (miles) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) Foundation Dam Construction plete Cost DePere lock2 DePere dam2 Little Kaukauna lock 2 Little Kaukauna dan 2 Rapide Croche lock 2 Rapide Croche Dam 2 Kaukauna fifth lock 2 Kaukauna fourth lock2 Kaukauna third lock 2 Kaukauna second lock 2 Kaukauna first lock 2 Kaukauna Dam2 Kaukauna guard lock Little Chute combined lock: Lower Upper Little Chute second lock2 Little Chute first (guard) lock' Little Chute Dam2 Cedars lock2 Cedars Dam2 Appleton fourth lock 2 Appleton lower dam2 Appleton third lock 2 Appleton second lock 2 Appleton first lock 2 Appleton upper dam Menasha lock2 Menasha Dam2 7.1 DePere 7.2 DePere 13.0 DePere 13.1 DePere 19.2 Wrightstown 19.3 Wrightstown 22.8 Kaukauna 23.1 Kaukauna 23.3 Kaukauna 23.4 Kaukauna 23.6 Kaukauna 24.0 Kaukauna 24.0 Kaukauna 24.4 Little Chute 25.4 Little Chute 26.4 Little Chute 26.5 Little Chute 26.6 Little Chute 27.3 Little Chute 27.4 Little Chute 30.7 Appleton 30.9 Appleton 31.3 Appleton 31.6 Appleton 31.9 Appleton 32.2 Appleton 37.0 Menasha 37.8 Menasha 6622 1 1 1 1 1 1 36.0 36.0 36.0 35.6 36.6 30.6 35.0 35.1 40.0 146.0 8.9 146.0 7.2 146.0 8.3 144.0 9.1 144.1 10.2 144.0 10.2 144.0 9.6 144.4 11.0 35.4 146.5 10.9 36.3 . 144.1 10.6 35.0 144.2 13.8 35.4 - - 35.0 144.0 9.8 35.0 144.0 7.6 35.0 144.0 8.7 35.1 144.6 9.6 35.0 144.7 10.0 35.4 144.0 8.5 10.3 12.0 8.0 9.5 8.8 9.3 6.7 9.3 6.9 6.0 6.9 6.3 6.0 6.0 6.9 6.0 9.4 - 6.0 7.6 8.0 6.6 6.8 8.1 6.0 6.9 6.6 7.2 8.6 6.0 6.1 7.3 7.9 8.6 6.0 6.0 8.0 Rock - Concrete 1936 $229,308 Rock Fixed3 4 Concrete 1929 209,536 Clay - Concrete 1938 362,427 Clay and gravel Fixed3 4 Piers and concrete 1926 179,398 Rock - Concrete 1934 228,738 Rock Fixed3 4 Concrete 1930 118,975 Rock - Composite 1898 13,3105 Rock - Stone masonry 1879 37,536 Rock - Stone masonry 1879 39,948 Rock - Stone masonry 1903 24,313 Rock - Stone masonry 1883 38,704 Rock Fixed 3 4 Concrete 1931 123,763 Rock - Stone masonry 1891 12,630 Rock Hardpan Rock Rock Rock Rock Rock Rock Rock Rock Clay Rock Rock Clay Hardpan - Stone masonry 1879 - Stone masonry 1879 - Stone masonry 1881 - Stone masonry 1904 Fixed 3 4 Concrete 1932 - Stone masonry 1888 Fixed3 4 Concrete 1933 - Stone masonry 1907 Fixed3 4 Concrete 1934 - Stone masonry 1900 - Stone masonry 1901 - Stone masonry 1884 Fixed3 Concrete 1940 - Composite 1899 Fixed3 Concrete 1937 102,304 48,555 7,8175 82,554 34,972 84,973 40,893 73,903 32,238 22,940 36,004 151,558 19,3265 84,686 'Depth shown is on breast wall, which is controlling depth for upper pool. 2Original structure built prior to assumption of control by United States on Sept. 18, 1872. 3Provided with sluices. 4Flash boards used. 5Partially rebuilt. 31-78 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 31-F RECONNAISSANCE & CONDITION SURVEYS Name of Project Date Survey Conducted Alpena Harbor, Mich. Au Sable Harbor, Mich. Belle River, Mich. Big Suamico Harbor, Wis. Black River (Alcona County) Mich. Chippewa Harbor, Mich. Grays Reef Passage, Mich. Little Bay De Noc Harbor, Mich. Mackinaw City Harbor, Mich. Marquette Harbor, Mich. Oconto Harbor, Wis. Pensaukee Harbor, Wis. Petoskey Harbor, Mich. Port Wing Harbor, Wis. St. James Harbor, Mich. Tawas Bay Harbor, Mich. Traverse City Harbor, Mich. Washington Island, Wis. TABLE 31-G April 1981 June 1981 July 1981 February 1981 May 1981 May 1981 June 1981 April 1981 August 1981 March 1981 September 1981 January 1981 June 1981 July 1981 September 1981 May 1981 March 1981 June 1981 OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost To September 30, 1981 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Alpena Harbor, Mich. 1980 337,3841 404,890 Au Sable Harbor, Mich. 1979 209,7761 2,416,703 Bayport Harbor, Mich. 1975 93,597 35,471 Bayfield Harbor, Wis. 1979 183,855 63,843 Belle River Harbor, Mich. 1980 24,301 36,566 Big Suamico River, Wis. 1975 20,243 102,989 Black River Harbor, Mich. 1980 383,350 479,225 Black River (Alcona Co.) Mich. 1971 Channels Straits of Mackinac, Mich. 1972 2,832,629 88,828 Chippewa Harbor, Isle Royale, Mich. 1959 125,629 6,661 Eagle Harbor 1979 205,164 53,572 Forestville, Mich. 1969 Grand Marais Harbor, Mich. 1980 1,055,871 1,659,305 Grays Reef Passage, Mich. 1970 190,521 612,635 Lac La Belle Harbor, Mich. 1980 269,270 182,641 Les Cheneaux Islands, 1980 399,478 283,391 Channels Mich. Little Bay De Noc, Gladstone Harbor, Mich. 1966 332,832 54,086 Mackinac Island Harbor, Mich.2 1969 229,085 70,277 Mackinaw City Harbor, Mich.3 1969 136,286 19,702 Marquette Harbor, Mich. 1979 1,282,893 1,388,625 Northport Harbor Oconto Harbor, Wis. 1980 130,754 1,032,981 Pensaukee, Wis. 1966 34,035 127,200 Petoskey Harbor, Mich. 1979 118,239 311,870 Pine River, Mich. 1980 13,649 27,840 Port Austin Harbor, Mich. 1980 1,128,334 1,159,114 Port Wing Harbor, Wis. 1980 63,393 576,619 St. James, Beaver Island, Mich.4 1957 49,171 33,362 St. Joseph River, Mich. 1975 54,555 19,185 Tawas Bay Harbor, Mich.' 1978 1,954,821 11,216 Traverse City Harbor, Mich. 1976 366,579 109,225 Warroad River, Wis. 1978 86,105 734,280 White Lake Harbor, Mich. 1980 317,406 1,662,463 'Includes $114,786 for previous projects and $16,400 Contributed Funds. 2Excludes Contributed Funds of $105,004. 3Excludes Contributed Funds of $136,286. 4Excludes Contributed Funds of $7,500. 5Includes $804,453 Contributed Funds. 31-79 DETROIT, MICH., DISTRICT TABLE 31-H OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost To September 30, 1981 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Grand River, Grandville, Mich.1 1966 Grand River, Lansing, Mich. 1971 7,300 Kalamazoo River (Battle Creek) Mich.2 1975 4,471,235 Kalamazoo River (Kalamazoo) Mich. 1975 421,466 Kawkawlin River, Mich.3 1971 1,204,559- Mount Clemens, Clinton River, Mich.3 1953 1,136,0086 Upper River Rouge, Mich.6 1968 7,935 1Awaiting Appropriation of Funds. 2Includes $108,335 Contributed Funds. 3Completed. 4Includes $204,559 Contributed Funds. 5Includes $202,996 Contributed Funds. 6 Planning indefinitely suspended due to lack of local cooperation. 31-80 BUFFALO, N.Y., DISTRICT* The district comprises northern Ohio, northwestern Penn- drainage basins from boundary between the states of Ohio and sylvania and western and northern New York, embracing U.S. Michigan to international boundary line east of Frontier, New waters of Lake Erie exclusive of small portion of western end, York. Lake Ontario, and St. Lawrence River, with their tributary IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page Beach Erosion Control Page 1. Ashtabula Harbor, Ohio ...................... 32- 2 2. Barcelona Harbor, N.Y...................... 32- 2 3. Black Rock Channel and Tonawanda Harbor, N.Y...................... 32- 2 4. Buffalo Harbor, N.Y ...................... 32- 3 5. Cape Vincent Harbor, N.Y. ................. 32- 4 6. Cattaraugus Harbor, N.Y. .................. 32- 4 7. Cleveland Harbor, Ohio ................... 32- 5 8. Conneaut Harbor, Ohio ......... ........ 32- 6 9. Dunkirk Harbor, N.Y......................... 32- 7 10. Erie Harbor, Pa..........................32- 7 11. Fairport Harbor, Ohio ........................ 32- 8 12. Geneva-on-the-Lake, Ohio .................... 32- 8 13. Great Sodus Bay Harbor, N.Y ............... 32- 8 14. Huron Harbor, Ohio ....................... 32- 9 15. Irondequoit Bay, N.Y.........................32- 9 16. Little Sodus Bay Harbor, N.Y. ............... 32- 9 17. Lorain Harbor, Ohio ......................... 32-10 18. Oak Orchard Harbor, N.Y. .... ......... 32-11 19. Ogdensburg Harbor, N.Y. .................. 32-11 20. Olcott Harbor, N.Y........................... 32-11 21. Oswego Harbor, N.Y ....................... 32-11 22. Port Clinton Harbor, Ohio. .................... 32-12 23. Port Ontario Harbor, N.Y..................... 32-12 24. Rochester Harbor, N.Y. ...... ......... 32-12 25. Rocky River Harbor, Ohio ...................... 32-13 26. Sackets Harbor, N.Y.......................32-13 27. Sandusky Harbor, Ohio ...................... 32-13 28. Toledo Harbor, Ohio...................... 32-14 29. Vermilion Harbor, Ohio ....................... 32-14 30. West Harbor, Ohio ....................... . 32-14 31. Wilson Harbor, N.Y. ..................... 32-15 32. Reconnaissance and condition surveys .. 32-15 33. Other authorized navigation projects . . 32-15 34. Navigation work under special authorization ........ .. 32-15 35. 36. 37. 38. Lakeview Park, Lorain, Ohio .... Presque Isle Peninsula, Erie, Pa. Other authorized beach erosion control projects .............. Beach erosion work under special authorization ....... .......... 32-15 .. 32-15 .............. 32-16 .............. 32-16 Flood Control 39. Cayuga Creek, Cheektowaga, N.Y........ 40. Cuyahoga River Basin, Ohio ............... 41. Dansville and vicinity, Canaseraga Creek, N.Y ............. 42. Ellicott Creek, N.Y................... 43. Mt. Morris Lake, N.Y., Genesee River .................. 44. Point Place, Toledo, Ohio ......... 45. Reno Beach - Howard Farms Area, Ohio ............. 46. Scajaquada Creek, N.Y............... 47. Inspection of completed flood control projects ................. 48. Other authorized flood control projects .............. ....... 49. Flood control work under special authorization..... .. .......... ..... 32-16 32-17 32-17 32-18 32-18 . 32-18 ... 32-19 ..... 32-19 ... 32-19 ..... 32-19 ... 32-19 Deauthorized Projects 50. Deauthorized projects ........................ 32-19 General Investigations 51. Surveys ................................. 32-19 52. Collection and study of basic data .............. 32-20 53. Hydrologic studies ........................... 32-20 * All cost and financial statements for projects are listed in Table 32A at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 32-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 Navigation 1. ASHTABULA HARBOR, OHIO Location. On south shore of Lake Erie, at mouth of Ashtabula River, 59 miles easterly from Cleveland, Ohio. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14836.) Previous Projects. For details see page 1963 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1593 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. For description see pages 1297-99 of Annual Report for 1966. Federal cost of completed project is $12,240,147. Non-Federal costs of $5,743,000, including contribution of $47,000, were for construction of access roads, docks, storage and handling facilities and dockside dredging. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests contributed $47,000 for work authorized by 1936 and 1970 acts. Terminal facilities. There are 16 piers and wharves. One facility is owned by city of Ashtabula and one is owned by Coast Guard. Ten facilities are along banks of Ashtabula River and six are on southside of outer harbor. Eleven terminals have railroad connections and six have mechanical-handling facilities. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 42, revised 1972, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Major Rehabilitation: Contract operations were initiated in June 1981 for rehabilitation of approximately 3,692 feet of the east breakwater and 3,888 feet of the west breakwater. The rehabilitation consists of placing approximately 151,000 tons of armor and underlayer stone on the slopes and rebuilding the structures to their design height. Construction during FY81 cost $3,663,962. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services and condition surveys by Government plant and hired labor cost $35,842. Stone purchase for minor structure repair cost $14,188. U.S. hopper dredge Hoffman removed 175,961 cubic yards bin measure of shoaled material over an area of approximately 130,000 square yards of the lower river and outer harbor at a cost of $220,064. Removal of 240,909 cubic yards, scow measure, of shoaled material, by contract, to project depths of 29, 28 and 27 feet cost $443,930. An economics study, by contract, cost $12,593. Engineering effort on major repairs to the east and west breakwaters cost $50,127. Costs related to the diked disposal program were $4,009. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project is complete. West breakwater was completed in 1915 except 580 feet of inner end which was completed in 1923, and 600 feet of outer end which was completed in 1935. East breakwater was completed in 1915; 800 feet of westerly end was removed and a lakeward extension of 700 feet was completed in 1935. Old inner east breakwater 1,200 feet long was completed in 1909, and westerly 600 feet were removed in 1913 and 350 feet in 1935. The 18- and 16-foot sections of river channel and turning basin were deepened in 1939. A 25-foot deep approach channel through east outer harbor to easterly docks and a turning basin were completed in 1960. Deepening of this area to 28 feet, as authorized by 1965 act, was initiated in July 1967 and completed in June 1968. Deepening upper 1,550 feet of river channel to 16 feet was completed in July 1960. Deepening 29-foot entrance channel, 28-foot channel through outer harbor, 27-foot approach channel to Penn Central Co's. slip, 27-foot channel in Ashtabula River to a point 2,000 feet upstream from its mouth, and 22-foot areas in east outer harbor, as authorized by the 1960 act, was initiated in May 1962 and completed in June 1963. Contract operations for removal of 250 feet of inner breakwater as authorized by 1937 act and deepening triangular-shaped area adjacent thereto as authorized by 1960 act were initiated in July 1977 and completed in December 1977. Harbor structures require repairs. Portions of both east and west breakwaters, rubblemound construction, where slope stone has pulled away, core stone has washed away, and deck stones have dropped, will be repaired under the major rehabilitation program commencing in FY 1981. East breakwater light foundation tilted due to displacement of rubblemound protection and needs repairs. Approximately one mile of the navigation channel at the upriver end, not used by commercial navigation, is maintained to 6-foot depth for recreational navigation. Costs of existing project were $12,240,147 (including $536,648 public works funds) for new work, $7,677,925 for maintenance and $3,663,962 for rehabilitation, a total of $30,479,206. In addition, $47,000 of contributed funds were expended for new work. 2. BARCELONA HARBOR, N.Y. Location. On south shore of Lake Erie about 17 miles southwesterly of Dunkirk, N.Y., and 29 miles northeasterly of Erie, Pa. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14823.) Previous projects. Adopted by July 4, 1936, River and Harbor Act. Only information available is in index to report of Chief of Engineers under title "Portland Harbor, N.Y." Existing Project. For description of existing project see page 1506 of Annual Report for 1961. Actual costs for new work for completed project were $1,124,286. Non-Federal costs of $60,000 were incurred by local interests. Of this amount, $7,500 was a cash contribution and remainder was for providing necessary lands and construction of public wharf. Existing project was authorized by the 1945 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2nd sess.). Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests contributed $7,500. Terminal facilities. Facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services and condition surveys by Government plant and hired labor cost $5,039. Removal of 38,077 cubic yards, scow measure, of shoaled material, by contract, to project depths of 10 and 8 feet cost $287,108. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of existing project was initiated in August 1958 and completed in August 1960. Construction of concrete walkway ramp (recreation facility) was initiated and completed in June 1965. Concrete ramp was extended 40 feet shoreward in June 1966. Several sections of concrete deck on east and west breakwaters have cracked and subsided due to settlement of supporting material. The deficiency is not critical and repairs have been deferred. Costs of existing project were $1,129,237 for new work, including $4,951 for recreation facilities, and $351,079 for maintenance, a total of $1,539,248. In addition, $7,500 contributed funds expended for new work. 3. BLACK ROCK CHANNEL AND TONAWANDA HARBOR, N.Y. Location. Improvement is essentially that of upper 13.5 miles of Niagara River from its head at Lake Erie, Buffalo, N.Y., to and including Tonawanda Harbor, N.Y. It comprises improvements formerly designated by three titles; viz, Lake Erie entrance to Black Rock Harbor and Erie Basin, N.Y., Black Rock Harbor and Channel, N.Y., and Tonawanda Harbor and Niagara River, N.Y. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14832.) Previous projects. For details see items 5 and 7, page 1970 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1612 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description of existing project and Federally owned Black Rock ship lock, see page 1548 of Annual Report for 1962. Improvement of guide pier at Black Rock 32-2 BUFFALO, N.Y., DISTRICT lock, as authorized by 1935 act was deauthorized by Congress in August 1977. Cost for completed portion of new work is $10,457,093. Enlarging of existing 21-foot turning basin and deepening lower 1,500 feet of Tonawanda inner harbor from 16 to 21 feet, authorized by the 1954 act, was deauthorized by Congress in May 1981, and is excluded from foregoing cost. Estimated cost (1961) of this portion is $339,000. Non-Federal costs are estimated at $1,540,000 for costs incurred by New York State for construction of Erie Basin and protecting breakwater, and construction and extension of Bird Island pier, and by other local interests for relocation of utilities. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Two facilities are along upstream end of channel. Below Black Rock lock and at Tonawanda Harbor there are 13 privately owned terminals. There are two Stateowned barge canal terminals at Tonawanda, N.Y., and several marine service and supply docks for recreational and other small craft. The Corps owns a wharf adjacent to Black Rock Lock which is private. Ten terminals have railroad connections and six mechanical-handling facilities. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. (Port Series No. 41, revised 1971, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and results during fiscal year: Operation and care (Black Rock Lock): Lock was in operation 301 days and closed for underwater cleaning and repairs January 17 through March 21, 1981. Ordinary maintenance and repair of structures and grounds were accomplished throughout year by Government plant and hired labor. Total costs of $990,594 were distributed as follows: operation and care: operation of lock, ordinary maintenance and repair $506,567; security service and maintenance of grounds $60,049; miscellaneous inspection and condition surveys and support of Water Control Center $58,683. Maintenance (structure repairs) by U.S. derrick boat McCauley cost $97,634. Clearing and snagging in project channels by Government plant and hired labor cost $26,898. An economics study of the lock by contract cost $12,593. Installation of sanitary facilities on the lock wall by contract cost $65,401. Remodeling of lock control houses and repairs to concrete cap of the lockwalls commenced by contract cost $47,000. Engineering in-house effort on installation of sanitary facilities at the lock, rehabilitation of lock control houses, repairs to concrete on east wall, and repairs to fenders on lockwall cost $115,769. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project is about 97 percent complete. Channel from Buffalo Harbor north entrance to opposite Sixth Avenue, North Tonawanda, is complete. Different sections of this channel were completed to project depth as- follows: Lake Erie section in 1909; Black Rock Canal section in 1915; Niagara River section from lock to deep water pool above Tonawanda, in 1913; and Tonawanda section, including turning basin, 1921. Channel was further widened as follows: Triangular area at Lake Erie entrance to canal was completed in 1922 and transferred from Buffalo Harbor project in 1945; Lake Erie section was widened at bend opposite foot of Georgia Street, Buffalo, in 1924; Black Rock Canal section just south of International Bridge at Buffalo, in 1928, and opposite foot of Maryland Street, Buffalo, in 1930; and Niagara River section near westerly end of Rattlesnake Island shoal in 1928. Rock shoals extending above a depth of 21.4 feet were removed from Lake Erie entrance to canal and in canal south of Ferry Street Bridge in 1937. Rock shoals extending above a depth of 22 feet were removed from Lake Erie entrance to canal, in Black Rock Canal, and in Niagara River portion of canal in 1948-49. Widening Lake Erie entrance to canal was completed in 1958. Tonawanda Creek Channel was completed in 1902. Tonawanda Inner Harbor Channel was completed in 1904. Enlargement of Tonawanda turning basin and extension of Bird Island pier were completed in 1936. Lock, including wing walls and retaining walls above lock, was completed in 1914, and 100-foot east wing wall extension in 1927. Guide pier connecting with west lower wing wall was completed in 1916, except for 200-foot northerly extension and construction of concrete platform in the angle. Upstream 300 linear feet of lower west guide pier were repaired 1951-59. Lock-operating houses were completed in 1924. Extension of guide pier as authorized by 1935 River and Harbor Act was deauthorized by Congress in August 1977. Uncompleted portion of 1954 River and Harbor Act, deepening lower 1,500 feet of Tonawanda Inner Harbor, was authorized by Congress in May 1981. Condition of structures range from poor to fair. Repairs to the most critical section of Bird Island pier from its northerly terminus at Squaw Island to the Peace Bridge (2,800 feet) were essentially completed during 1976. Replacement of original electrical equipment has been completed. Planning to repair or replace much of the badly deteriorated or worn out mechanical systems has been completed. The wing wall at the upper approach to the lock has shifted laterally about two feet at maximum deflection. Costs of existing project were $10,457,093 (including $1,760,000 emergency relief funds and $6,000 expended for deferred portion of project) for new work; $10,746,369 for maintenance; $12,123,306 for operating and care; a total of $33,326,768. In addition $1,356,007 extended between July 9, 1914, and June 30, 1935, on operation and care of works of improvement under provisions of permanent indefinite appropriation for such purposes. 4. BUFFALO HARBOR, N.Y. Location. At eastern end of Lake Erie, at head of Niagara River, 176 miles easterly from Cleveland, Ohio. (See NOAA Nautical Charts 14820 and 14833.) Previous projects. For details see page 1967 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1606 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing projects. For description see page 1368 of Annual Report for 1963. In addition, on 15 December 1980, OCE authorized the removal of bridge abutments of South Michigan Avenue Bridge. New work for completed project cost $18,837,601. Estimated non-Federal costs were $9,188,000 for deepening, widening, and improving Buffalo River and ship canal, constructing piers, retaining walls, and dikes and performing dockside dredging. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 45 wharves and piers of which 4 piers, owned by Niagara Frontier Port Authority, and 9 privately owned and operated facilities are on outer harbor and along sides of Lackawanna and Union ship canal, 4 are along banks of Buffalo ship canal, and 26 along Buffalo River. Coast Guard facilities are at mouth of Buffalo River along left bank. City of Buffalo owns a slip on right bank of Buffalo River just north of Michigan Avenue Bridge for mooring city fireboat. Thirty-four terminals have railroad connections and 29 mechanical- handling facilities. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 41, revised 1971, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Removal of South Michigan Avenue bridge abutment, by contract, was initiated in March 1981 and cost $159,540. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services and condition surveys by Government plant and hired labor cost $225,301. Repairs to 1400 linear feet of breakwater by U.S. derrickboat Mc- Cauley cost $391,976. Repairs to pumpout units by U.S. derrickboat McCauley cost $9,696. Maintenance dredging of Buffalo River and ship canal, outer harbor, and entrance channel with disposal in Spoil Disposal Facility No. 4 was accom- 32-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 plished by U.S. hopper dredge Hoffman and 259,675 cubic yards bin measure of material were removed at a cost of $646,772. Snagging and clearing in projecl channels by Government plant and hired labor cost $1220. Sediment samplng for heavy metals cost $8,003. A bulk chemistry and elutriate study at the harbor, by contract, cost $42,192. In-house engineering costs for preparation of plans and specifications for dredging under Industry Capability Program (ICP), environmental testing and structure inspections were $31,507. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project is complete. Stony Point breakwater was completed in 1899, a 1,000-foot extension was completed in 1914, 1,200 feet of shore end were sold to Lackawanna Steel Co. in 1918, and another 1,000-foot extension completed in 1935. South breakwater was completed in 1903, and a 300-foot extension completed in 1935. North breakwater was completed in 1901 and old breakwater in 1893. South pier was completed in 1869 and rebuilt in 1962. Removal of three shoals to 27 feet, on direct approach to south entrance channel was completed in 1954. Deepening to 25 feet in southerly part of outer harbor was completed in 1956. During 1955 and 1956, Buffalo River Channel, Buffalo River entrance channel, and ship canal were deepened to 22, 23, and 22 feet, respectively. Deepening 23-foot project area in outer harbor was completed in 1956 except for strips 50 feet wide along harbor line and 180 feet wide between Merchants Refrigerating Co's piers and south end of city dike. Widening Buffalo River Channel at Ohio Street Bridge was completed in July 1959. Deepening north entrance channel to 25 feet in earth and 26 feet in rock, removal of 1,000 feet of old breakwater, widening southerly portion of Buffalo River entrance channel, relocation of Coast Guard facilities and construction of a detached breakwater, all as authorized by 1945 act, were completed in 1962. Removal of shoals and deepening of approach to south entrance, south entrance channel, and southerly part of outer harbor, all as authorized by 1960 act, were initiated in June 1962 and completed in May 1964. Deepening 27-foot project area of north outer harbor including the 50- and 180-foot wide strips along harbor line as authorized by 1962 act, was initiated in July 1964 and completed in September 1965. Removal of bridge abutment, as authorized by Section 107, was initiated in March 1981. Repairs to 650 linear feet of superstructure of old breakwater were completed in August 1965 under minor rehabilitation program. Harbor structures are generally in good condition except at various points of south breakwater completed in 1902 and old breakwater completed in 1889, where slope stone on lakeside has been displaced. Repair of collapsed 1,400-foot long south pier was completed in May 1962. For disposal of dredged materials a pilot study experimental diked area was constructed in 1968 and another diked disposal area at Times Beach was constructed in 1971. Construction of diked disposal area (Site 4) was completed in June 1977. Removal of abutments of South Michigan Avenue Bridge, as authorized by Section 107 of 1960 River and Harbor Act were initiated at a cumulative cost of $239,305. Costs of existing project were $18,837,601 (including $655,500 public works funds) for new work, $40,877,255 for maintenance and $295,457 for rehabilitation, a total of $60,010,313. In addition, local interests contributed $56,805 toward construction of Times Beach Dike. 5. CAPE VINCENT HARBOR, N.Y. Location. On south shore of St. Lawrence River about 2.5 miles from Lake Ontario and 49 miles northerly from Oswego Harbor, N.Y. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14800.) Previous projects. For details see page 1975 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1634 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description of existing project see page 1566 of Annual Report for 1962. Actual costs for completed portion of project were $275,082. Deepening remainder of 16-foot area of project as authorized by 1945 act, at estimated cost of $159,000 (1954) is classified deferred. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Two privately owned terminals for fish and a United States fish hatchery are located along waterfront bordering project. A ferry to Wolfe Island, Ontario, uses wharf owned by village. A yacht club dock and several other privately owned servicing and storage docks are for recreational and other small craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services by hired labor cost $21,022. Repairs to concrete cap of the 1,381 foot breakwater, by contract, were $1,242,997. In-house engineering costs were $23,136. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is about 63 percent complete. Construction of a breakwater 1,381 feet long, completed in 1915, of which 40 feet of shore return arm was built in 1901, and deepening of 20-foot project area and a portion of 16-foot project area completed in 1947. Breakwater is of timber- crib, concrete-superstructure type. The crib is in good condition but concrete cap is disintegrating and needs repair. Contract for repairs to the concrete cap was awarded late in FY 1980 with completion scheduled during November 1981. Deepening of remainder of 16-foot area, as authorized by 1945 act, is classified deferred and remains to be done to complete the project. Costs of existing project were $275,082 for new work and $1,471,841 for maintenance, a total of $1,746.923. 6. CATTARAUGUS HARBOR, N.Y. Location. At mouth of Cattaraugus Creek on south shore of Lake Erie about 12 miles northeasterly from Dunkirk Harbor, N.Y. and 24 miles southwesterly from Buffalo Harbor, N.Y. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14823.) Existing project. Provides for navigation, flood control and recreational breakwater fishing by constructing: (a) arrowhead breakwaters in Lake Erie at mouth of Cattaraugus Creek; (b) an entrance channel, 200 feet wide at lakeward end, 100 feet wide and eight feet deep from that depth in lake to a point 1,575 feet upstream; (c) a channel 100 feet wide, six feet deep an additional 3,425 feet upstream; and (d) development of recreational facilities at mouth for breakwater fishing. Estimated Federal cost for new work is $4,500,000 (Oct. 1981). Estimated non-Federal cost for new work is $2,520,000 (Oct. 1981) including cash contribution of $2,500,000 and the remainder for lands and damages. Existing project was authorized by 1968 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 97, 90th Cong., 1st sess.). Local cooperation. See page 32-5 of Annual Report for 1976 for details of requirements of local cooperation. Required cash contribution is presently estimated at $2,500,000. The State of New York executed local cooperation agreement in July 1981. Terminal facilities. Facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: En- 32-4 BUFFALO, N.Y., DISTRICT gineering and Design was completed at a cost of $207,600. Contract for construction was awarded in Sept. 1981. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of project remains to be done to complete project. Approximately $29,600 were expended during FY 1977 for emergency work for "Operation Runoff." As a result of record snowfalls during the 1976-1977 winter, advance measures were undertaken to reduce flood damages anticipated from the snowmelt. Work was performed under authority of Public Law 84-99, Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies. 7. CLEVELAND HARBOR, OHIO Location. On south shore of Lake Erie, at mouth of Cuyahoga River, 176 miles westerly from Buffalo, N.Y. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14839.) Previous projects. For details see page 1962, Annual Report for 1915, and page 1585, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description of existing project, as authorized thru the 1966 modification, see page 1269 of Annual Report for 1967. Further improvements were recommended by 1976 WRD Act which authorized preparation of Phase I design memorandum for proposed new work comprising of: (a) extension of lake approach and entrance channel at arrowhead entrance and deepening of those areas to 32 feet; (b) incremental removal, as required, of 500 feet of existing west breakwater spur and 400 feet of existing east breakwater spur to facilitate turning movements; (c) construction of a 1,200-foot rubblemound breakwater extension at east end of east breakwater; (d) deepening of fan shaped approach channel and a 1,000-foot wide entrance channel extending 2,900 feet into east basin, to a depth of 32 feet; (e) deepening of existing 500-foot wide east basin channel to 28 feet; and, (f) recreational facilities, for fishing on west breakwater, including pedestrian handrail, pedestrian bridge and public parking. Estimated total Federal cost of new work is $65,215,000 (Oct. 1981) of which $29,315,100 is for completed work and balance of $35,900,000 (Oct. 1981) is for new work proposed by 1976 WRD Act. Estimated non-Federal cost is $10,263,000 (Oct. 1981) of which $9,203,000 is actual cost for completed work and balance of $1,060,000 is required cash contribution for work authorized by 1976 WRD Act. Remaining work authorized by 1946 River and Harbor Act consisting of widening and deepening right bank of Cuyahoga River at downstream end of Cut 4 is considered inactive and excluded from foregoing cost estimate. Estimated Federal cost (1966) of this portion is $85,600 and non-Federal cost (1966) is $5,000,000. Remaining work authorized by 1958 R & H Act consisting of planning and replacement of bridges number 19 (E.L.R.R.) and 32 (B.&O.R.R.) and widening Cuyahoga and Old River channels and remaining work authorized by 1960 R&H Act consisting of deepening remainder of Cuyahoga River from bridge number 1 to and including Old River to a depth of 27 feet has been classified as deferred and is also excluded from foregoing cost estimate. Estimated Federal cost (Oct. 1976) of this portion is $18,033,300 and estimated non-Federal cost (Oct. 1976) is $21,251,000. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed portion of project. See page 32-5 of Annual Report for 1977 for details of requirements of local cooperation for work recommended by 1976 WRD Act. Assurances will be requested upon copletion of Phase II General Design Memorandum. Terminal facilities. There are 72 piers and wharves. Eleven are owned by city of Cleveland, of which 7 are operated by the Cleveland-Cuyahoga County Port Authority. Fourteen are on outer harbor, 11 on banks of Old River and remaining 47 along deep-draft section of Cuyahoga River. Forty-seven terminals have railroad connections and 39 mechanical-handling facilities. The Corps owns a wharf at foot of East 9th Street. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 43, revised 1970, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Preparation of Phase I General Design Memorandum, as authorized by 1976 WRD Act, was continued, with funds provided under the Construction General appropriation, at a cost of $269 and under the General Investigation Appropriation at a cost of $223,457. Completion of Design Memo will be accomplished with funds provided under the General Investigations appropriation. Major Rehabilitation: Contract operations were initiated during May 1979 for rehabilitation of 4,400 feet of east breakwater requiring placement of 139,000 tons of stone and 29,500 dolosse concrete armor units on slopes and rebuilding the structure to its design height. Construction continued during this fiscal year at a cost of $1,363,651. At the end of FY 1981, the contract was 100% complete. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services and condition surveys by Government plant and hired labor cost $392,325. Maintenance of Cuyahoga and Old River to 23-foot depth, by contract, employing clamshell bucket dredge, was accomplished and 301,537 cubic yards, scow measure, of shoaled material were removed. Total cost of contract dredging operations were $1,976,766. Repairs to approximately 600 linear feet of east breakwater by U.S. derrick boats Tonawanda, McCauley and Ohio cost $1,166,217, including new stone purchase. U.S. hopper dredge Lyman removed 35,355 cubic yards, bin measure, of shoaled material from river entrance and east and west basin channels at a cost of $169,340. Snagging and clearing in project channels by Government plant and hired labor cost $11,757. Repairs to the east pierhead light foundation, by contract, cost $313,985. Repairs to Dike No. 14, Doan Brook culvert by contract cost $66,983. A density measurement study by contract cost $12,000. Sediment sampling for heavy metals cost $8,003. Monitoring water quality at diked disposal, by contract, cost $35,075. Costs for Co-operative Stream Gaging Program were $14,100. Miscellaneous engineering hired labor costs were $23,144. Related costs to the Diked Disposal Program were $11,459. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project is about 39 percent complete. River entrance channel was improved by construction of parallel piers 325 feet apart, and dredging to 25 feet deep at low-water datum up to Penn Central Co. bridge. Piers were completed in 1900 and dredging in 1935. An outer harbor, about 1,300 acres in extent, was formed by construction of an aggregate length of about 30,000 feet of breakwater, including converging arms, completed in 1915. About 1,770 linear feet of east breakwater and 1,000 linear feet of west breakwater were repaired under major rehabilitation program in 1962 and 1963. Structures are generally in fair condition. Sections of east breakwater where cover stone has been displaced and settled are in need of repair. Several lake storms in connection with high lake levels combined to displace several sections of the concrete cap of the west breakwater. In addition, cracks in the concrete over most of the west breakwater indicate possible crib failure. Currently about 7,200 linear feet of the east breakwater, 1,200 linear feet of the west breakwater and the entire west pier are in need of repair. Main entrance was widened to 700 feet and protected by converging arms extending lakeward from east and west breakwaters, completed in 1908. Outer harbor was deepened, 1933-35, to 25 feet at lowwater datum throughout west basin, in entrance channel, and over a portion of east basin adjacent to entrance channel. Portions of channel in Cuyahoga River were widened each year from 1930 to 1942 and in 1958. Removal of 150 feet of easterly end of west breakwater and construction of 400 feet of spur breakwater to protect gap in west breakwater shore arm were completed in 1935. A concrete base for a light tower was con- 32-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 structed at east end of east breakwater in 1917 in lieu of eastend pierhead. Providing a 1,300-foot extension of Cuyahoga River channel to present project limit was authorized by 1945 River and Harbor Act and partially completed with Defense Plant Corp. funds during 1942 and remaining portion previously classified inactive was deleted from project by 1962 act. Old River to Sand Products Corp. dock was deepened to 23 feet in 1952. Replacement of Norfolk & Western Railway bridge 25 was completed April 1953. Replacement of Penn Central Co. bridge 8 was completed December 1953. Replacement of Penn Central Co. bridge 9 was completed June 1956 and channel in vicinity of structure widened during 1957. Replacement of Penn Central Co. bridge 1 was completed in January 1957. Replacement of Norfolk & Western Railway bridge 15 was completed in March 1959. Replacement of Baltimore & Ohio Railroad bridge 3 was completed in October 1957. Widening near Penn Central Co. bridge 1 was completed in September 1957. Widening near Baltimore & Ohio Railroad bridge 3 and in vicinity of Norfolk & Western Railway bridge 15 and deepening Cuyahoga River were completed in July 1958. Widening Cuyahoga River at upstream portion of Cut 4 was completed in October 1959. Widening and deepening Cuyahoga River at Cut 10 were completed in April 1961. Deepening lake approach, entrance channel, lower portion of Cuyahoga River to bridge 1 and east and west basins (stage 1 of 1960 act) was completed in November 1962. Replacement of city of Cleveland highway bridge 33 was initiated in August 1963 and completed in June 1965. Widening portion of Cut 14 in Old River vicinity of bridge 33 was completed in June 1965. Deepening of 27- and 28-foot areas in east basin and 25-foot deep channel through remainder of east outer harbor including approach channel to Nicholson Terminal all as authorized by 1962 act was initiated in April 1964 and completed in April 1965. Deepening of downstream 1000-foot portion of Old River channel extension to 23 feet, as authorized by Section 107 of 1960 River and Harbor Act, was initiated in April 1968 and completed in August 1968. For disposal of dredged materials a pilot study experimental diked disposal area was constructed in the East basin and another diked disposal area adjacent to and easterly there of were constructed during 1968-1969. Construction of diked disposal areas, (Site 12 and Site 14) were completed in June 1975 and October 1979, respectively. Contract operations for major rehabilitation of 4,400 linear feet of east breakwater were initiated in May 1979 and completed in October 1980. Work remaining to complete existing project consists of: 1976 Act - completion of preparation of Phase I General Design Memorandum which will be accomplished with funds provided under the General Investigations appropriation; 1960 Act Stage II - Deepening remainder of Cuyahoga River from bridge number 1 to and including Old River classified as deferred; 1958 Act - completion of preconstruction planning for and replacement of bridges 19 and 32, and widening Cuyahoga and Old River channels classified as deferred; and, 1946 Act - the widening of Cuyahoga River at downstream end of Cut 4 classified as inactive. Costs of existing project were $30,089,145 (including $616,767 public works funds) for new work, $117,612,404 (including $125,000 public works funds) for maintenance and $10,268,364 for rehabilitation, a total of $157,969,913. In addition $201,960 of contributed funds were expended for maintenance. 8. CONNEAUT HARBOR, OHIO Location. On south shore of Lake Erie, at mouth of Conneaut River, 73 miles easterly from Cleveland, Ohio. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14824.) Previous projects. For details see page 1964, Annual Report for 1915. Existing Project. For description see page 1274 of Annual Report for 1967. Actual costs for new work for completed portion of the project were $7,541,369. Entire project modification authorized by 1966 act providing for a recreational small boat harbor is classified as deferred. Estimated cost (1970) of this modification is $717,000. For completed work non-Federal costs were $200,000 for dockside dredging and removal of existing dolphins. Estimated non-Federal cost of $2,877,000 (1970) includes cash contribution of $717,000 and the remainder is for construction of service facilities for the 1966 project modification. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed portion of project. See page 32-6 of Annual Report for 1971 for requirements of local cooperation for deferred project modification as authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1966. Terminal facilities. There are seven piers and wharves. Six are privately owned and operated and located in inner harbor. Remaining facility is city owned on the south side of outer harbor. Six terminals have railroad connections and four mechanical- handling facilities. (See Port Series No. 42, revised 1972, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services and condition surveys were done by Government plant and hired labor at a cost of $36,730 Minor structure repairs with Government plant labor cost $7,889. U.S. hopper dredge Lyman removed 64,922 cubic yards, bin measure, of shoaled material over an area of approximately 130,000 square yards of the Conneaut River and outer harbor to project depths of 27 and 28 feet at a cost of $166,088. Removal of 112,559 cubic yards bin measure of shoaled material, by contract, from the Conneaut River and outer harbor to project depths of 27, 28, and 22 feet cost $263,203. In-house engineering cost $10,318. Planning continued for diked disposal facility at a cost of $27,381. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project is 91 percent complete. Under existing project a length of 4,445 feet of new west breakwater was completed in 1916; old east breakwater, 1,050 feet long, was extended shoreward 800 feet (completed 1911) and lakeward 900 feet (completed 1923). The 1,670-foot shore arm to west breakwater was completed in 1934. Extension of west breakwater 830 feet lakeward, east breakwater 925 feet lakeward, and removal of lake arm of west breakwater were completed in 1935; 642 feet of old west breakwater were removed in 1916, and remaining 600 feet in 1925. Two piers were constructed at mouth of Conneaut River. Removal of west pier and 459 feet of east pier were completed in 1934. East pier is now 1,008 feet long. A channel through outer harbor was deepened to 25 and 26 feet in 1938. Inner 1,200 feet of west breakwater was rebuilt to its original elevation during 1941 to 1952 and is in fair condition. Repairs to 600 feet of west breakwater and 1,200 feet of east breakwater were completed in 1964. Deepening city dock approach channel to 8 feet initiated in September 1964 and 1,150-foot long shoreward extension of east breakwater initiated in July 1965 were completed in November 1965. Removal of 995 feet of east pier was initiated in November 1965 and completed in December 1965. Deepening inner and outer harbor channels as authorized by 1962 River and Harbor Act was initiated November 1965 and completed July 1967. Work remaining to complete project consists of construction of recreational small boat harbor as authorized by 1966 R&H Act presently classified as deferred. At several places along remainder of west breakwater and along east breakwater, slope stone on lake side is disintegrating and pulling away and deck stone is settling. Other harbor structures are generally in good condition. Costs of existing project were $7,541,369 (including $1,010,500 public works funds) for new work, $5,676,628 for maintenance and $651,850 for rehabilitation, a total of $13,869,847. 32-6 BUFFALO, N.Y., DISTRICT 9. DUNKIRK HARBOR, N.Y. Location. On south shore of Lake Erie, 37 miles southwesterly from Buffalo,N.Y. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14823.) Previous projects. For details see page 1966 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1604 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description of completed portion of existing project see page 32-8 of Annual Report for 1976. For description of uncompleted small boat harbor project as authorized under Section 201 of Flood Control Act of 1965, see page 32-8 of Annual Report for 1978. Estimated Federal cost of new work is $2,368,000 (Oct. 1979) of which $418,200 is actual cost for completed work and the balance of $1,949,800 is for new work authorized under Section 201 of 1965 Flood Control Act. Estimated total non-Federal cost of $1,961,000 (Oct. 1979) includes $11,000 contributed for completed work and balance of $1,950,000 is required cash contribution for work authorized by 1965 F.C. Act. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Contract operations for small boat harbor authorized under Section 201 of Flood Control Act of 1962, initiated in August 1979, were finalized with a credit of $16,483. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services and condition surveys by Government plant and hired labor cost $6,854. Engineering costs for an Environmental Impact Statement were $11,631. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project is complete. Deep draft navigation project was completed in 1951. Project structures are generally in good condition. About 800 linear feet of lake side of west pier completed in 1921 has been reinforced with stone riprap, and repairs to additional areas where concrete superstructure cracked and settled are necessary. Construction of small boat harbor, as authorized under Section 201 of 1965 Flood Control Act, is complete. Costs of existing project were $2,198,774 for new work and $1,242,788 for maintenance, a total of $3,441,562. In addition, local interests contributed $1,961,000. 10. ERIE HARBOR, PA. Location. On southerly side of bay formed by Presque Isle Peninsula, on south shore of Lake Erie, 78 miles westerly from Buffalo, N.Y. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14835.) Previous projects. For details see page 1965 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1600 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description see pages 1363-64 of Annual Report for 1963. Entire project modification authorized by 1945 River and Harbor Act, providing for deepening channel and basin, both 23 feet deep, to Penn Central Company coal docks at westerly end of harbor, was deauthorized by Congress in August 1977. Actual costs for new work for completed portion of project were $2,860,906. Extension of north pier portion as authorized by 1899 act is deferred and is excluded from foregoing cost. Estimated cost (1955) of this portion is $1,071,000. A portion of work authorized by 1960 act, deepening strips adjacent to north and south piers, is classified deferred and is also excluded from foregoing cost. Estimated cost (July 1962) of this portion is $78,000. Non-Federal costs for completed work were $51,000 for providing ore dock and dredging slip adjacent thereto. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Sixteen piers and wharves, of which 12 are privately owned and operated. Erie International Marine Terminal No. 1 owned by Port Commission, city of Erie, is along main waterfront on south side of Presque Isle Bay and Coast Guard facilities are on north side. Two off-shore oil docks are on Lake Erie. Eight terminals have railrqad connections and six mechanical-handling facilities. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 42, revised 1972, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services and condition surveys by Government plant and hired labor cost $64,094. U.S. hopper dredge Lyman removed 49,768 cubic yards of shoaled material over an area of about 73,000 square yards from the midchannel entrance, harbor basin, and west basin to project depth of 29 and 28 feet at a cost of $142,032. Subsurface exploration, by contract, cost $5,415. Economics study of the harbor cost $11,290. In-house engineering for repair of north and south piers cost $30,941. Costs related to the diked disposal program were $1,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project is 71 percent complete. Breakwater and piers were completed in 1915. A 3,050-foot section of rubblemound protection work on peninsula was completed in 1921, 5,281 feet of steel-sheet piling protection work with stone facing were completed in 1930, and two experimental 300-foot stone groins and about 1,385 feet of stone-protection work at beach 2 were completed in 1943. Construction of 2,750 feet of stone-protection work, just north of Kelso groin, was completed in 1944. The 18-foot harbor basin was deepened in 1900. Widening and straightening of entrance channel was completed in 1936. Deepening entrance channel and approach channel to easterly ore dock to 25 feet except for small triangular areas along southeasterly and southwesterly limits of approach channel, was completed in 1939. The 21-foot harbor basin was deepened in 1940. Widening approach channel to easterly ore dock was completed in August 1958. Deepening entrance channel to 29 feet, and approach channel and turning basin at easterly docks to 28 feet was completed in 1962. Deepening approach channel to Erie International Marine Terminal No. 1 to a depth of 27 feet in soft material, and 28 feet in hard material, as authorized by 1962 act was initiated in June 1966 and completed in August 1966. Construction of diked disposal area was completed in October 1979. Harbor structures generally are not in good condition. Concrete superstructure of north and south piers completed in 1909, has disintegrated, broken, and dropped in various sections, due to timber-crib failure at these sections. In outer 200-foot section of south breakwater, slope stone on channel side has pulled away and dropped. A length of 40 linear feet of south pier and 1,141 linear feet of north pier was reinforced and repaired with steel-sheet piling and concrete. Approximately 1,400 linear feet of steel-sheet piling bulkhead tion works, constructed in 1930, in which stone facing settled was completely covered with sandfill as provided in shore protection project authorized for Presque Isle Peninsula. Work remaining to complete project consists of completion of deepening strips adjacent to north and south piers as authorized by 1960 act, which is classified as deferred and conditional extension of north pier as authorized by 1899 act which is also classified as deferred. Deepening of channel and basin at westerly end of harbor as authorized by 1945 Act was deauthorized by Congress in August 1977. Costs of existing project were $2,860,906 for new work, $11,547,327 for maintenance and 32-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 $1,154 for rehabilitation, a total of $14,409, 387. In addition, $154,500 expended from contributed funds for maintenance. 11. FAIRPORT HARBOR, OHIO Location. On south shore of Lake Erie at mouth of Grand River, 33 miles easterly from Cleveland, Ohio. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14837). Previous projects. For details see page 1963 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1590 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description of existing project as authorized thru the 1960 modification, see page 1526 of Annual Report for 1962 for description of small boat harbor as authorized by Sec. 201 of 1965 Flood Control Act. Estimated total Federal cost of new work is $4,931,000 (Oct. 1980) of which $2,591,000 is actual cost for completed portion of project and the balance of $2,340,000 is for proposed work authorized by Sec. 201 of 1965 FC Act. Entire project modification authorized by 1960 River and Harbor Act, providing for deepening lake approach channel, 800-foot wide channel through outer harbor and channel in Grand River, and enlargement of turning basin, is classified inactive and is excluded from foregoing cost. Estimated cost of this modification is $3,170,000 (1963). Estimated non-Federal cost is $4,991,000 of which $101,000 were for bulkheads and dockside dredging for completed portion of project and $2,560,000 which includes cash contribution of $2,330,000, is for work authorized by Sec. 201 of 1965 FC Act. For the inactive 1960 project modification, estimated non-Federal cost of $3,821,000 (1963) is for lands, relocations, utility changes, dock dredging and dock and bulkhead modifications. See Table 32B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. See page 32-11 of 1976 Annual Report regarding assurances of local cooperation for work authorized by R&H Acts of 1927 and 1960 and page 32-11 of 1977 Annual Report for requirements of local cooperation for work authorized by Sec. 201 of 1965 Flood Control Act. Terminal facilities. Sixteen piers and wharves, all along banks of Grand River. One facility is owned by Coast Guard. Nine terminals have railroad connections and ten mechanicalhandling facilities. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 42, revised 1972, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services and condition surveys by Government plant and hired labor cost $50,025. U.S. hopper dredge Lyman removed 16,554 cubic yards, bin measure, of shoaled material from about 140,000 square yards of lake approach channel, harbor basin and entrance channel to project depths of 29 and 28 feet, at a cost of $77,299. Removal of 74,988 cubic yards scow measure of shoaled material by contract cost $266,850. Bioassay contract and planning for diked disposal facility cost $12,988. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project is about 32 percent complete. Lengths of 400 and 275 linear feet of east pier were repaired with steel-sheet piling and sandfilled in 1949 and 1958, respectively. Other end of structure requires extensive repairs. River entrance was improved by construction of an east pier completed in 1904, and removal of old west pier and construction of bulkhead, completed in 1939. East breakwater was completed in 1931 and west breakwater in 1935. River channel was deepened to 21 and 24 feet and turning basin to 18 feet in 1939. Outer harbor was deepened to 25 feet and river channel widened at its mouth in 1940. Deepening 8-foot channel in Grand River at upper end of and adjacent to west side of 21-foot project channel, was completed in 1956. Harbor structures require repairs. Concrete cap of several cells of cellular section of west breakwater requires replacement. At several places along remainder of west breakwater the slope stone has disintegrated and settled. The 6,700-foot long, rubblemound east breakwater, built in 1932 is in poor condition throughout most of its entire length. At several locations of the structure, totaling approximately 2,000 linear feet, slope stone has disintegrated and settled and core stone washed out, leaving large areas of structure only slightly above low-water datum. Work remaining to complete project consists of completion of preconstruction planning for and construction of breakwaters, dredging of approach and dock channels as authorized by Sec. 201 of 1965 Act; and completion of preconstruction planning for and deepening lake approach channel, 800-foot wide channel through outer harbor and channel in Grand River, and enlargement of turning basin, as authorized by 1960 act which is classified inactive. Costs of existing project were $2,590,671 (including $187,772 public work funds) for new work, and $10,021,092 for maintenance, a total of $12,611,763. 12. GENEVA-ON-THE-LAKE, OHIO Location. On south shore of Lake Erie, about 17 miles east of Fairport Harbor, Ohio and 12 miles west of Ashtabula Harbor, Ohio (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14826.) Existing project. Small boat harbor project provides for: (a) breakwaters in Lake Erie aggregating about 1,050 feet in length; (b) entrance channel about 770 feet long, 100 feet in width, 8 feet deep; (c) inner channels, 100 feet wide totaling 1,680 feet in length and 6 feet deep; (d) a mooring area 0.9 acres in area with depths varying from 6 to 8 feet, (e) development of recreational facilities, and (f) development of wetland mitigation features. Estimated Federal cost for new work is $2,850,000 (Oct. 1981). Non-Federal cost estimate of $2,850,000 (Oct. 1981) is cash contribution toward first cost of construction. Existing project was authorized under provision of Section 201 of Flood Control Act of 1965. (H.D. 402, 91st Cong. 2 sess.) Local cooperation. See page 32-11 of 1978 Annual Report for requirements of local cooperation for work authorized by Sec. 201 of 1965 Flood Control Act. By letters dated November 10, 1977 and 15 April 1981 the State of Ohio Department of Natural Resources, the responsible agency, has indicated its willingness and ability to furnish the assurances. Assurances of local cooperation will be requested upon completion of Design Memorandum, Phase II. Terminal facilities. There are no commercial or recreational facilities at the harbor. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Preconstruction planning was continued at a cost of $235,727. Condition at end of fiscal year. Completion of preconstruction planning and construction of project remains to be done. 13. GREAT SODUS BAY HARBOR, N.Y. Location. On Sodus Bay, which is a nearly landlocked indentation on south shore of Lake Ontario, 29 miles westerly from Oswego, N.Y. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14814.) Previous projects. For details see page 1972 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1526 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description, see page 1380 of Annual Report for 1963. Improvements authorized by 1962 act, consisting of deepening lake approach channel, entrance channel and inner approach channel were deauthorized by Congress in August 1977. Actual costs of new work for completed por- 32-8 BUFFALO, N.Y., DISTRICT tion of project were $249,187. Costs incurred by local interests are not available. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services and condition surveys by Government plant and hired labor cost $4,118. An environmental study by contract at the harbor cost $9,300. In-house engineering costs were $9,368. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project is complete. Structures are generally in good condition except for the east breakwater concrete cap where several sections have been displaced and the structure breached. 500 linear feet of west pier were reinforced with steel-sheet piling and concrete in 1958. Lakeward end of west pier (550 feet long and 880 linear feet of east pier) were reinforced with steel-sheet piling and concrete in 1962 and 1963 under a major rehabilitation program. Repairs to 300 linear feet of east pier were made during FY 1975. Deepening lake approach channel, entrance channel and inner approach channel as authorized by 1962 act, was deauthorized by Congress in August 1977. During FY 1978, a Reconnaissance Report was prepared under Sec. 111, PL 90-483, for prevention or mitigation of shore damage attributable to federal navigation. Costs of existing project were $249,187 for new work, $2,351,488 for maintenance, and $713,544 for rehabilitation, a total of $3,314,219. 14. HURON HARBOR, OHIO Location. On south shore of Lake Erie at mouth of Huron River, 47 miles westerly from Cleveland, Ohio. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14843.) Previous project. For details, see page 1961 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1576 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description see page 1347 of Annual Report for 1963 and page 32-12 of Annual Report for 1978. Cost of completed portion of existing project was $4,834,006. Construction of detached breakwater as authorized by 1962 R&H act is deferred. Estimated cost of construction of breakwater is $12,970,000 (July 1972). Non- Federal costs of $163,000 were incurred by local interests in 1963 for dockside dredging of areas between Federal improvement and terminal facilities. See Table 32B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Six privately owned wharves and docks, one along left bank of Huron River and remainder along right bank. Four terminals have railroad connections and four mechanical- handling facilities. Facilities are regarded as adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 42, revised 1972, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services and condition surveys by Government plant and hired labor cost $31,955. Repairs to diked disposal overflow and timber fenders by the U.S. derrickboat Ohio cost $59,490. Removal of 164,955 cubic yards of shoaled material, by contract, from the lake approach channel and the entrance channel to depths of 29 and 28 feet cost $405,068. An environmental study, by contract, cost $40,019. Economic studies at harbor cost $10,318. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project is 27 percent complete. Structures are generally in good condition except for the inner 800 feet of the west pier where the concrete superstructure has cracked and settled. Repairs to 400 linear feet of west pier under minor rehabilitation program were initiated in August and completed in December 1963. Construction of diked disposal area was completed in December 1975. During FY 1978, a Reconnaissance Report was prepared under Sec.111, PL 90-483 for prevention or mitigation of shore damage attributable to Federal Navigation. Contract operations, which were initiated in May 1977, for deepening lake approach, entrance and river channels, and enlargement of turning basin as authorized by 1962 River and Harbor Act were completed in August 1979. Construction of the detached' breakwater authorized by 1962 River and Harbor Act, has been classified deferred. Costs of existing project were $4,834,006 (including $561,262 public works funds) for new work, $11,605,046 for maintenance, and $247,030 for rehabilitation, total of $16,686,082. 15. IRONDEQUOIT BAY, N.Y. Location. On south shore of Lake Ontario, 4 miles east of Rochester, N.Y. at mouth of Irondequoit Creek, Monroe County, N.Y. (See NOAA Nautical Charts 14804 and 14815.) Existing project. Provides for: (a) entrance channel located at easterly end of bay, 8 feet deep and 100 feet wide, extending from 8-foot depth in Lake Ontario to junction with inner bay channels a distance of about 900 feet; (b) inner channel, 7 feet deep and 100 feet wide, from entrance channel to deep water in bay, a distance of about 3,000 feet; (c) 7-foot deep mooring area; (d) two stone rubblemound structures 1,400 feet and 850 feet in length at entrance extending to 8-foot depth in lake; and (e) recreational facilities of 0.8 acre paved parking area, two comfort stations, stairs on highway embankment, concrete ramps leading to and over the breakwater and jetty, and hand railings on the breakwaters. Estimated Federal cost for new work is $2,770,000 (Oct. 1981). Estimated non-Federal cost for new work is $9,320,000 (Oct. 1981) including cash contribution of $2,080,000 (Oct. 1981) and remainder for lands, damages and highway bridge relocation. Existing project was authorized by 1958 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc 332, 84th Cong. 2nd. sess.) Local cooperation. By letter dated June 13, 1980, New York State Office of Parks and Recreation reaffirmed its intent to provide assurances of cooperation. Assurances will be requested upon completion of Phase II General Design Memorandum. Terminal facilities. Facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Preconstruction planning for the project was continued at a cost of $137,817. Condition at end of fiscal year. The work remaining to be done consists of completion of preconstruction planning for and construction of the project. 16. LITTLE SODUS BAY HARBOR, N.Y. Location. Little Sodus Bay, on south shore of Lake Ontario, 15 miles west of Oswego, N.Y. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14803.) Previous projects. For details see page 1973 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1628 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description see page 1378 of Annual Report for 1958. New work for completed project cost $69,066. Non-Federal costs of $6,000 were incurred for channel dredging. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. 32-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services and condition surveys by Government plant and hiredJabpr cost $2,437. An environmental study by contract at the harbor cost $4,500. In-house engineering costs were $8,532: Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was completed in 1906. Structures are in good condition except the entire east breakwater. Repairs to 625 linear feet of the east pier were initiated in 1972 and completed in July 1973. A 300 -foot section of east pier and a 1,127-foot section of west pier were repaired during period September 1965 to July 1967 under major rehabilitation program. Costs of completed project were $69,066 for new work, $3,027,005 for maintenance, and $742,822 for rehabilitation, a total of $3,838,893. 17. LORAIN HARBOR, OHIO Location. On south shore of Lake Erie at mouth of Black River, 28 miles westerly from Cleveland, Ohio. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14841.) Previous projects. For details, see page 1961 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1580 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description see pages 1319-22 of Annual Report for 1966. Estimated Federal cost of new work is $26,246,000 (Oct. 1976). Deepening and widening remainder of Black River Channel at Cut 1 and construction of bank stabilization as authorized by 1960 act and modified by 1965 act is classified deferred. The estimated cost of $5,317,000 for this work is included in the above estimate. A portion of work authorized by 1960 act, dredging of 15- to 25-foot wide strips adjacent to the U.S. East and West piers is also deferred and estimated cost of $60,200 (July 1966) is excluded from foregoing cost estimate. Total non-Federal cost estimate is $8,853,000 (Oct. 1976) including $3,000 contributed by local interests toward construction of west breakwater shorearm. For work authorized by 1960 act, including deferred portion, non- Federal costs are estimated to be $8,805,000 for lands, relocations of utilities, modifications of existing dock and bulkheads, construction of new bulkheads and dockside dredging. For work authorized by 1965 act, classified as deferred, local interests must make a cash contribution presently estimated at $45,000. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. For completed work, local interests contributed $3,000. Work authorized by 1960 act (and modified by 1965 act) is classified deferred. All other conditions fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 23 piers and wharves, of which three are on outer harbor and remainder are along banks of Black River. Two are owned by the city. Eight terminals have railroad connections and 15 mechanical-handling facilities. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 42, revised 1972, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New work -1960 project modification: Adjustment of final costs resulted in credit of $22,990. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection surveys and condition surveys by Government plant and hired labor cost $79,411. Repairs to the pumpout facility by U.S. Derrickboat Ohio cost $57,160. Snagging and clearing in project channels by Government plant and hired labor cost $10,878. U.S. hopper dredge Hoffman removed 33,307 cubic yards, bin-measure, of shoaled material over an area of about 43,000 square yards of the lower turning basin, and U.S. dredge Lyman removed 99,537 cubic yards, bin-measure of shoaled material over an area of about 87,000 square yards at the lower turning basin and river entrance channel, to project depths of 29, 28, and 25 feet at a cost of $346,338. An economic study of the harbor, by contract, cost $12,593. In-house engineering costs were $13,504. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project is about 78 percent complete. An outer harbor as provided by constructing breakwaters and pierheads completed in 1915, except extension of west breakwater to shore, which was completed in 1921. A channel through outer harbor to entrance to Black River was deepened to 25 feet in 1937, also a channel 16 feet deep to municipal pier was provided in 1936. Deepening outer harbor to 25 feet was completed in 1946. Entrance to river was improved by construction of parallel piers completed in 1909. Widening of two bends in river was completed in 1934. River channel was deepened to 24 feet and upstream turning basin opposite National Tube Co. dock was deepened to 17 feet in 1937 and 1938. Upstream turning basin was widened in 1944. Deepening downstream basin in bend of Black River immediately upstream of Baltimore & Ohio Railroad coal dock to 20 feet was completed in 1951. Deepening upper and lower portion of Black River (above and below 21st Street Bridge) to 27 feet, entrance channel between piers 2,200 feet long to 28 feet and 800-foot wide lake approach channel to 29 feet, an irregularly shaped area in west outer harbor to 25 feet and enlarging and deepening turning basin to 21 feet, were initiated in May 1962 and completed in November 1963. Deepening remainder of outer harbor, triangular area vicinity of East pier, to project depth 28 feet was initiated in April 1966 and completed in June 1966. Construction of new east cellular steel sheet pile breakwater shorearm 2,323 feet long with a 134-foot stone shore connection, was initiated in January 1963 and completed in October 1963. Construction of new cellular steel sheet pile outer detached breakwater was initiated in August 1964 and completed in June 1966. Removal of 250 feet of the lakeward end of the East breakwater and construction of a new pierhead was completed in November 1965. Removal of shoals in lake approach channel was initiated in September 1966 and completed in July 1967. Partial channel widening and bank stabilization at Cut 1 was initiated in September 1968 and completed in September 1969. Replacement of substructure of the Norfolk and Western Railway company bridge was initiated in February 1971 and completed in November 1972. Replacement of the superstructure was initiated in August 1972 and completed in April 1975. Preauthorization studies for construction of small boat harbor as authorized by the Chief of Engineers on June 4,1968 under authority of Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act were terminated in February 1975. Local interests indicated that there is no further interest in the construction of small boat harbor at the study location. Widening of Black River at Cut 2 was initiated in July 1974 and completed in August 1974. Construction of diked disposal area was completed in April 1978. Protection works are generally in fair condition. Shoreward section of west breakwater, completed in 1921, has disintegrated and settled and in places is below low-water datum. At various locations on lake face of lakeward section of west breakwater, stones shifted leaving holes in the wall, and in many sections of east breakwater stones above water have deteriorated and shifted. Severe cracks and shifting have developed in superstructure of west breakwater pierhead. East pier, completed in 1905 was reduced in length from 1,875 feet to 880 feet in November 1964 by removal of lakeward 995 feet. Remainder of East Pier is in various stages of disrepair where concrete superstructure supported by timber cribs has cracked and settled. Remaining work, all classified as deferred, consists of widening remaining portion at bends in river channel, including construction of bank stabilization works at Cut 1 and dredging strips adjacent to east and west piers, all as authorized by 1960 act and modified by 1965 act. Costs of existing project were 32-10 BUFFALO, N.Y., DISTRICT $20,447,296 (including $165,000 public works funds) for new work and $17,379,280 (including $76,300 public works funds) for maintenance, a total of $37,826,576. 18. OAK ORCHARD HARBOR, N.Y. Location. On south shore of Lake Ontario at mouth of Oak Orchard Creek, 33 miles westerly of Rochester, N.Y. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14805.) Previous project. For details see page 628 of Annual Report for 1905. Existing project. For description of completed existing project see page 32-14 of 1975 Annual Report. Actual Federal cost for completed project was $1,613,500. Estimated non-Federal cost is $270,000 (July 1971) including cash contribution of $170,700 and $54,002 for recreational facilities and remainder for lands and construction of wharf. Existing project was authorized by the 1945 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2nd sess.). Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests contributed $224,702. Terminal facilities. There is no commercial navigation at Oak Orchard Harbor. Terminal facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection and condition surveys cost $2897. Environmental study, by contract, was performed at a cost of $4,000. Related in-house engineering costs were $4,101. Condition at end of fiscal year. Contract operations for new work initiated in May 1974 were completed in September 1975. Costs of existing project were $1,586,996 for new work and $76,965 for maintenance, a total of $1,663,961. In addition, $224,702 contributed funds expended for new work. 19. OGDENSBURG HARBOR, N.Y. Location. On south shore of St. Lawrence River, 62 miles by water from Lake Ontario. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14764.) Previous projects. For details see page 1975 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1635 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description see page 1568 of Annual Report for 1962. Actual cost for new work for completed portion of project was $375,086. Removal of hard material shoals from lower basin portion of project as authorized by 1935 act, at an estimated cost of $183,000 (1954) is classified inactive. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 7 terminals in harbor and 3 in Federal project area. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services and condition surveys by Government plant and hired labor cost $4,072. Feasibility study by contract cost $6,555. Environmental study by contract cost $11,750. Related in-house engineering costs were $12,536. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project is complete except for inactive portion. Channels were deepened to 19 feet in 1913. Upper entrance channel was widened to 400 feet in 1920 and to 700 feet in 1935. Removal of elevator wharf and deepening lower basin was completed in 1935, except for removal of hard material shoals which is classified inactive. Costs of existing project were $375,086 (including $174,549 public works funds) for new work, and $1,171,035 for maintenance, a total of $1,546,121. 20. OLCOTT HARBOR, N.Y. Location. On south shore of Iake Ontario at mouth of Eighteen Mile Creek about 18 miles east of mouth of Niagara River and 63 miles by water west of Rochester, N.Y. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14806.) Previous project. For details see page 1971 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1621 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description see page 1555 of Annual Report for 1962. Cost of new work for completed project was 81,500, exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects, all of which was contributed by local interests. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests contributed $1,500. Terminal facilities. Facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services and condition surveys by Government plant and hired labor cost $713. Environmental study by contract commenced at a cost of $5,500. In-house engineering costs were $2,520. Conditions at end of fiscal year. Existing project was completed in 1918. Wooden superstructure was replaced with concrete in 614.6 linear feet of west pier. A length of 800 linear feet of east pier has been reinforced and repaired with steel-sheet piling and concrete. Similar repairs to 620 linear feet of west pier began in June and were completed in November 1963. Costs of existing project were $407,082 for maintenance, $14,477 for rehabilitation, a total of $421,559. Funds in the amount of $186,000 under the Public Works Acceleration Act were also expended for pier repair. In addition, $1,500 for new work, and $5,000 for maintenance were expended from contributed funds. 21. OSWEGO HARBOR, N.Y. Location. On south shore of Lake Ontario, at mouth of Oswego River, 59 miles easterly from Rochester, N.Y. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14813.) Previous projects. For details see page 1973 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1630 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description see pages 1383-84 of Annual Report for 1963. Completed portion of project cost $7,242,039 and non-Federal costs for completed work were $4,440,000 for lands, dockside dredging, construction of terminal, wharves and cargo handling facilities. Deepening a 200-foot wide strip along harbor line east of mouth of Oswego River, remaining feature of work authorized by the 1930 act, is classified as inactive. Deepening to 22 feet a 150-foot wide strip along harbor line in west outer harbor, remaining feature of work authorized by 1940 act, was deauthorized in May 1981. Estimated Federal costs for this work are $246,000 (July 1957) and $2,419,000 (July 1966) respectively, and estimated non- Federal costs are $500,000 (July 1966) for dockside dredging for work authorized by 1940 act. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Seven piers and wharves in harbor and along river channel. In addition, Port of Oswego Authority owns two public terminals, one of which is west of river and includes a grain elevator and warehouse for miscellaneous freight. Other terminal is east of river and used for handling aluminum and general cargo. State of New York owns a river terminal used for mooring vessels. City of Oswego owns one dock and shore facilities for recreational craft. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. 32-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services and condition surveys by Government plant and hired labor cost $10,159. In-house engineering costs, including commencement of an economic study, by contract were $23,206. A bioassay analysis and evaluation of sediments, by contract, on the dike program cost $36,500. Related in-home engineering costs on the Dike Program were $1,160. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project is 73 percent complete. Outer west breakwater was completed in 1882, and originally 6,032 feet long with a 119-foot gap near westerly end, but was reduced to 4,359 feet in 1931, and gap was closed in 1942. West arrowhead breakwater was completed in 1931, and east arrowhead breakwater in 1932. Old lighthouse pier, a part of west inner breakwater, and upper and lower islands in Oswego River, were removed in 1931. A depth of 21 feet was obtained in Oswego River to within 50 feet of harbor line and in outer harbor east of Erie-Lackawanna coal dock, except a strip about 200 feet wide along harbor line east of river mouth, in 1932. Channel in Oswego River was widened to harbor lines in 1937. A channel, 16 feet deep and 100 feet wide, with a turning basin at its westerly end, was dredged in 1932 in outer harbor west of Erie-Lackawanna coal dock. Channel was widened to 250 feet and deepened to 21 feet below low-water datum in 1948. Removal of shoals to 25 feet in approach to entrance channel was completed in 1957. Contract for construction of 850-foot long detached breakwater at harbor entrance was initiated in May 1957 and completed June 1960. Deepening lake approach channel to 27 feet, 800-foot wide outer harbor channel including harbor turning basin to 25 feet and 1,600 feet of lower river channel to 24 feet, all as authorized by 1962 act, was initiated in June 1965 and completed in November 1965. Breakwaters are generally in fair condition except that slope stone in portions of west arrowhead breakwater has disintegrated and settled and core stone in a 1,500-foot section of west arrowhead breakwater has also settled in many places. Approximately 1,900 linear feet of deteriorated sections of outer west breakwater were repaired under minor rehabilitation program in 1962. Completion of inactive portions as described in paragraph for existing project, remain to be done to complete project. Costs of existing project were $7,242,039 for new work, $3,712,762 for maintenance, and $307,590 for rehabilitation, total of $11,262,391. 22. PORT CLINTON HARBOR, OHIO Location. Comprises lower half-mile of Portage River. River empties into Lake Erie 72 miles westerly from Cleveland, Ohio. (See Great Lakes Chart 14820). Existing project. Provides for parallel jetties at river mouth and a channel in Lake Erie and Portage River with a project depth of 10 feet. For additional details see page 1899 of Annual Report for 1951. (See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. There is one public fish dock, one private sand dock, one private fuel, lumber and coal dock, and five additional private docks. A dock at foot of Madison Avenue is owned by village of Port Clinton and open to the public. A shipyard builds small boats. Terminal facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Miscellaneous inspection services and condition surveys by Government plant and hired labor cost $1,934. An economics study by contract at the harbor cost $10,138. In-house engineering effort on repairs to the east and west jetties cost $24,402. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was completed in 1893. For additional details on completion, see page 1900 of Annual Report for 1951. Costs of existing project were $71,950 for new work and $460,696 for maintenance, total of $532,646. 23. PORT ONTARIO HARBOR, N.Y. Location. On southeasterly end of Lake Ontario, 19 miles northeasterly of Oswego, N.Y., and 32 miles southerly of Sackets Harbor, N.Y. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14803.) Previous projects. Adopted by the River and Harbor Act July 4, 1836. Only information available is in the index to the report of the Chief of Engineers. Existing project. Existing project, as modified by Phase I General Design Memorandum, provides for: (a) two shore connected rubblemound breakwaters in Lake Ontario at mouth of Salmon River, south breakwater about 1,450 feet long and north breakwater about 350 feet long; (b) entrance channel between breakwaters, 100 feet wide and 8 feet deep, from deep water in lake to a limit about 1,200 feet from 8-foot depth contour in lake; (c) river channel 85 feet wide and 6 feet deep from inner limit of entrance channel for a distance upstream of about 450 feet. Estimated Federal cost for new work is $5,220,000 (Jul. 1981). Estimated non-Federal cost for new work is $501,300 (Jul. 1981) including cash contribution of $211,300. Existing project was authorized by the River and Harbor Act of March 2, 1945 (H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess.). Local cooperation. See page 32-16 of Annual Report for 1976 for details of requirements of local cooperation. Assurances will be requested upon approval of Phase II Design Memorandum. Terminal facilities. There is no commercial navigation at Port Ontario Harbor. Terminal facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Preconstruction planning was continued at a cost of $16,689. Condition at end of fiscal year. Funds in the amount of $7,000 were expended in Fiscal Years 1946 and 1947 for preparation of Definite Project Report. Due to lack of local cooperation, the project was then placed in the deferred category. In January 1966, the State of New York Conservation Department expressed intent to cooperate with the Corps in construction of the project. The project was then reclassified to the active category in July 1966. Preconstructiuon planning was begun in 1976. In April 1980 the NYS Office of Parks and Recreation again stated their intent in support of the project. Formal assurances were requested in November 1980; however, the LCA has not been executed to date. Completion of preconstruction planning and construction remains to be done to complete the project. 24. ROCHESTER HARBOR, N.Y. Location. On south shore of Lake Ontario, at mouth of Genesee River, 59 miles westerly from Oswego, N.Y. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14815.) Previous project. For details see page 1471 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1623 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description see page 1556 of Annual Report for 1962. Actual cost for new work for completed project is $21,191,514. Non-Federal costs are estimated at $2,260,000, all for 1960 act, for lands, relocation of submarine cable crossing, relocations of small docks and boathouses, dockside dredging, structure modifications,and replacement of Baltimore & Ohio coal loader. See Table 32-B for authorizing 32-12 BUFFALO, N.Y., DISTRICT legislation. Local cooperation. Complied with except provision for replacement of coal loading facility as required by River and Harbor Act of July 14, 1960. Terminal facilities. One terminal facility at mouth of Genesee River has been leased to the Great Lakes Division of Pittston Stevedoring Corp. Facilities also consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services and condition surveys by Government plant and hired labor cost $33,618. U.S. hopper dredge Lyman removed 135,427 cubic yards, bin measure, of shoaled material from the lower turning basin and about 1.3 miles of Genesee River Channel for restoration of the project areas to a depth of 19 feet at a cost of $245,905. Repairs to approximately 410 linear feet of west pier, by contract, were completed at a cost of $537,495. Contract for bulk, elutriate and bioassy tests on harbor sediments was finalized at a cost of $1,937. In-house engineering costs on major repairs to east and west piers were $35,205. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project is completed. A length of 1,265 linear feet of west pier was reinforced with steel-sheet piling and concrete. An additional 2,600 feet of west pier and 2700 linear feet of the east pier is failing, the crib-filling stone has escaped and concrete is cracked. A length of 550 linear feet of east pier was reinforced and repaired with steel-sheet piling and concrete during 1954 and 1955 and a 700-foot section was repaired in 1971. Present channel was completed in 1935. Stage I of work authorized by 1960 act, consisting of deepening lake approach, entrance channel, and lower turning basin, was initiated in May and completed August 1962. Stage II of work authorized by 1960 act, consisting of deepening river channel, upper turning basin, and construction of two steel-sheet pile cell dolphins, was initiated in October 1962 and completed in December 1963. Channel is unstable and requires annual dredging to maintain adequate depth. Costs of existing project were $2,191,514 (including $56,806 emergency relief funds) for new work, and $9,978,782 (including $478 emergency relief funds) for maintenance, a total of $12,170,296. 25. ROCKY RIVER HARBOR, OHIO Location. At mouth of Rocky River which empties into Lake Erie 7 miles westerly from Cleveland, Ohio. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14826). Existing project. For description see page 1329 of Annual Report for 1966. Federal cost for completed project was $343,494 and non-Federal cost was a cash contribution of $249,346. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests contributed $249,346 for new work. Terminal facilities. Facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately-owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services and project condition surveys by Government plant and hired labor cost $25,033. Removal of 68,561 cubic yards, scow measure, of shoaled material by contract, to project depths of 10, 8, and 6 feet cost $800,452. An environmental study by contract cost $8,072. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project is completed. East pier, rubblemound construction, is generally in fair condition, except for a section 200 feet long which is badly deteriorated. The project modification authorized by 1965 River and Harbor Act was selected by the Secretary of the Army for inclusion in the Small Authorized Projects program. Realignment and extension of channel and construction of an anchorage basin, as authorized by 1965 act, were initiated in August 1968 and completed in December 1968. Costs of existing project were $343,494 for new work and $1,553,492 for maintenance, a total of $1,896,986. In addition, $249,346 contributed funds were expended for new work. 26. SACKETS HARBOR, NEW YORK Location. On south shore of Black River Bay at easterly end of Lake Ontario, about 41 miles northerly of Oswego, N.Y. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14802.) Previous project. For details see page 3160 of Annual Report for 1896 and page 2809 of Annual Report for 1898. Existing project. For description see page 2456 of Annual Report for 1948. Actual cost for new work for completed portion of project was $19,010. Deepening of the harbor area to project dimensions as authorized by 1945 act, was deauthorized by Congress in May 1981. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. See page 2457 of 1948 Annual Report for details. Terminal facilities. Facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: A feasibility study, by contract, of the harbor, cost $4,000. Inhouse engineering costs were $2,094. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project is about 5 percent complete. In 1884 a timber-crib mooring place was constructed and placed on shoal in harbor off Shiphouse Point, and in 1888, connected with shore by a dike 164 feet in length. Two stone groins perpendicular to beach were constructed in 1896. Deepening of the harbor area to complete the project was deauthorized in May 1981. Costs of existing project were $19,010 for new work and $22,688 for maintenance, a total of $41,698. 27. SANDUSKY HARBOR, OHIO Location. On south shore of Lake Erie, in southeasterly portion of Sandusky Bay, 50 miles westerly from Cleveland, Ohio. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14845.) Previous projects. For details see page 1960 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1574 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description see pages 1511-12 of Annual Report for 1962. Actual costs for new work for completed project were $6,250,121, excluding $325,000 contributed by local interests. Non-Federal costs for completed project are estimated at $675,000 including $325,000 cash contribution and remainder of $350,000 is for dockside dredging adjacent to deepened channels authorized by 1960 act. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests contributed $325,000 for new work. Terminal facilities. Fourteen piers and wharves, three at west end of harbor and remainder along dock channel. One is a base for State-owned fish research and patrol boats. One publicly owned and six privately owned are used for mooring fishing boats and recreational craft and for ferry service. Five 32-13 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 terminals have railroad connections and five mechanical-handling facilities. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 42, revised 1972, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services and condition surveys by Government plant and hired labor cost $46,899. Repairs to about 840 linear feet of east jetty rubblemound construction by U.S. derrick boat Tonawanda cost $234,183. Removal of 454,054 cubic yards scow measure of shoaled material by contract cost $706,742. Planning was continued for diked disposal area with an environmental study consisting of bulk chemistry and elutriate testing at a cost of $116,974 and a geotechnical contract costing $52,796. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project is complete. Harbor structures are generally in good condition except the inner 2,000 linear feet of the east jetty protection works, completed in 1922. Paralleling outer harbor entrance channel has subsided and in many places is barely above low water datum. The easterly 1,400 linear feet of rock dike paralleling the dock channel were rebuilt in 1956. In 1963, 500 linear feet of remaining 2,355 linear feet, westerly portion, of dike were removed. Deepening Moseley, Straight, Bay Channels and deepening and enlarging turning basin, all as authorized by 1960 act were initiated in June 1962 and completed in September 1965. Costs of completed existing project were $6,250,121 (including $599,500 public work funds) for new work, $9,797,793 for maintenance, and $675,606 for rehabilitation, a total of $16,723,520. In addition, $325,000 expended from contributed funds for new work. 28. TOLEDO HARBOR, OHIO Location. Comprises lower 7 miles of Maumee River and channel through Maumee Bay to Lake Erie. Maumee River has its source in northern Indiana and empties into Lake Erie. Harbor is at westerly end of Lake Erie, 99 miles westerly from Cleveland, Ohio. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14847.) Previous projects. For details see page 1959 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1565 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description of existing project see pages 32-18 and -19 of Annual Report for 1978. Cost of completed existing project was $15,567,147. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Maumee River through city of Toledo has been developed extensively for deep-draft navigation. Detailed information on actual port and harbor facilities are in Port Series No. 44 (revised 1972) prepared and published as Part 2, by Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors. Information on port administration and Federal services, port and terminal services and charges, and steamship services is prepared and published as Part I by the Port Development Staff, U.S. Department of Commerce. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, support of Water Control Center and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by hired labor at a cost of $219,488. U.S. hopper dredge Markham performed maintenance dredging removing 1,128,037 cubic yards, bin measure, of shoaled material, U.S. hopper dredge Hoffman removed 48,447 cubic yards bin measure of shoaled material and U.S. hopper dredge Lyman removed 165,300 cubic yards of shoaled material at a combined cost of $2,097,310. Maintenance of spoil disposal facilities cost $65,445. Repairs to mooring dolphin by contract cost $40,434. Sediment sampling for heavy metals cost $8,003. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project is complete. Costs of existing project were $15,567,147 for new work and $54,092,643 for maintenance for a total of $69,659,790. 29. VERMILION HARBOR, OHIO Location. On south shore of Lake Erie at mouth of Vermilion River, 37 miles westerly from Cleveland, Ohio. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14826.) Existing project. For description of existing project see pages 32-17 and 32-18 of Annual Report for 1975. Actual Federal cost for the completed existing project was $1,156,118. Estimated non-Federal cost for new work is $754,679 including cash contribution of $740,679 and remainder for relocation of submarine cable and construction of public wharf. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests contributed $740,679. Terminal facilities. Facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection and condition surveys by Government plant and hired labor cost $7,847. Study of the adverse effects of the completed project was continued at a cost of $40,465. An environmental study, by contract, of the harbor cost $8,284. In-house engineering costs were $1,060. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project is complete. Repairs to piers under minor rehabilitation program were initiated in June and completed in October 1964. Contract operations consisting of new detached breakwater, new channel and extension of river channel all as authorized by 1958 act, were initiated on June 11, 1973 and completed May 24, 1974. Engineering and design studies under Sec. 111, P.L. 90-483 for prevention or mitigation of shore damage attributable to federal navigation work were initiated in FY 1978. Through FY 1978 funds for this work were made available under the Operation and Maintenance appropriation. Starting with FY 1979, funds were made available under the Construction, General appropriation. Costs of existing project were $1,156,118 for new work, $1,321,217 for maintenance, and $139,775 for rehabilitation, a total of $2,617,110. In addition, $740,679 expended from contributed funds for new work. 30. WEST HARBOR, OHIO Location. On southwest shore of Lake Erie, 13 miles northeast of Port Clinton, Ohio (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14847.) Existing project. Existing project, as modified by Phase I General Design Memorandum, provides for two arrowhead breakwaters with an aggregate length of approximately 2,925 feet; entrance channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide to mouth of natural entrance and thence 80 feet wide to a depth of 8 feet; and access channel 3,980 feet in length, 80 feet wide and 8 feet deep from inner entrance to "Y" near center of harbor where channel divides northerly about 2,733 feet and southerly about 4,295 feet. Estimated Federal cost for new work is $3,150,000 (Oct. 1980). Estimated non-Federal cost is $4,330,000 (Oct. 1980), including cash contribution of $3,570,000. Existing project was authorized by 1965 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 245, 88th Cong., 2d sess.). Local cooperation. See page 32-20 of 1978 Annual Report for requirements of local cooperation. By letter dated January 31, 1978, State of Ohio has stated its intent to furnish assurances of local cooperation. and executed LCA was received on 9 March 1981. Terminal facilities. Commerce at the harbor presently con- 32-14 BUFFALO, N.Y., DISTRICT sists of recreational boating and affiliated activities. Operations and results during fiscal year. Construction initiated on 1 June 1981 and cost $1,608,209 ($800,000 contributed funds). Condition at end of fiscal year. Completion of construction remains to be done to complete the project. 31. WILSON HARBOR, N.Y. Location. At mouth of east branch of Twelve Mile Creek, which enters Lake Ontario 12 miles easterly of mouth of Niagara River, and 67 miles westerly of Rochester Harbor, N.Y. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14806). Previous project. For details see page 2395 of Annual Report for 1889, and page 628 of Annual Report for 1905. Existing project. For description see page 32-18 of Annual Report for 1975. Actual Federal cost for the completed existing project was $477,904. Estimated non-Federal costs are $774,000 which includes costs of $16,000 for previously completed work. Remainder of non-Federal costs are for work required for 1968 R & H Act including cash contribution of $166,988. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operation and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection and condition surveys by Government plant and hired labor cost $2,170. Feasibility study and environmental work, by contract, commenced-ata cost of $5,020. In-house engineering costs were $11,612. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project is completed. Restoration of east and west parallel piers and construction of entrance channel were completed in 1950. The project modification authorized by the 1968 River and Harbor Act was selected by the Secretary of the Army for inclusion in the Small Authorized Projects program. Work consisted of channel deepening, extension, and widening at Wilson Harbor and Tuscarora Bay. The work was initiated in May 1972 and completed in September 1972. Costs of existing project were $477,904 for new work and $190,714 for maintenance, a total of $668,618. In addition, $166,998 of contributed funds, expended for new work. 32. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Survey was conducted at Selkirk Shore State Park, N.Y. 33. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS See Table 32-C. 34. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION See Table 32-D. Beach Erosion Control 35. LAKEVIEW PARK, LORAIN, OHIO Location. In the City of Lorain, Lorain County, Ohio, on south shore of Lake Erie between 1,500 and 3,000 feet west of Lorain Harbor west breakwater. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14841.) Existing project. For description of existing project see page 32-19 of Annual Report for 1977. The Federal cost of the completed project was $1,360,986 and estimated non-Federal cost (Oct. 1976) was 850,000 for relocation. In addition, local interests contributed $583,280. Annual cost of 5-year program for beach replenishment and monitoring is estimated to be $75,000. Existing project authorized by 1954 River and Harbor Act (H.Doc. 224, 83rd Cong. 1st sess.). Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests contributed $583,280. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work. Five year monitoring program which was initiated in 1978 was continued at a cost of $35,876. Cooperative beach nourishment was conducted in FY 80 and FY 81, during which time a total of 9,000 cubic yards of sand has been placed within the project limits. The Federal cost for nourishment has totalled approximately $73,000 and costs to local interests totalled approximately $30,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of existing project is complete. Contract operations initiated in June 1977 were completed in October 1977. Post-construction operations consisting of beach replenishment and monitoring initiated in FY 1978 will be continued. Federal costs of $61,911 were incurred during FY 1981 for monitoring program and beach nourishment for a cumulative cost of $255,665. 36. PRESQUE ISLE PENINSULA, ERIE, PA. Location. At Erie, Pa., on south shore of Lake Erie, 78 miles southwest of Buffalo, N.Y. and 102 miles east-northeast of Cleveland, Ohio, (See NOAA Nautical Charts 14824 and 14835.) Existing project. For description of completed portion of existing project see page 1393 of Annual Report for 1963. The Water Resources Development (WRD) Act of March 7, 1974, reinstated and extended authorization for beach erosion control project, asprovided in 1960 R&H Act, for a period of five years from date of enactment of 1974 WRD Act, or if the review study of such project is not completed prior to end of such period, until such study is completed and a report thereon submitted to Congress. The 1976 Water Resources Development Act provides for continued annual nourishment by stating: "At expiration of authorization provided in Section 57 of Water Resources Development Act of 1974, the Secretary of the Army, acting through the Chief of Engineers, may provide periodic beach nourishment in accordance with cost sharing provisions of Section 103(a) (2) of Act of October 23, 1962." The act also authorized preparation of a Phase I General Design Memorandum. The Final Phase I General Design Memorandum was completed in August 1981 and the recommended plan provides for construction of 58 offshore rubblemound breakwater segments, beach restoration by placement of sand fill, and annual beach replenishment for shore protection. Estimated Federal cost (Oct. 1981) is $26,446,000 which includes $2,146,000 for completed work authorized by the 1954 and 1960 R&H Acts and $5,400,000 for completed work authorized by the 1974 and 1976 WRD Acts. Estimated non- Federal cost (Oct. 1981) is $14,613,000 which includes $2,483,000 for completed work authorized by 1954 and 1960 R&H Acts and $2,313,000 for completed work authorized by the 1974 and 1976 WRD Acts. See Table 32-b for authorizing legislation. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with for completed project as authorized by 1954 and 1960 R&H Acts. For nourishment program as authorized by 1974 WRD Act, an agreement between Department of Environmental Resources, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and Corps of Engineers was entered into on January 7, 1975. An agreement between the United States of America and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, acting through the Department of Environmental Resources, was entered into on February 21, 1979 for the annual nourishment which was extended by the 1976 Water Resources Development Act. The plan recommended in the Final Phase I General Design Memorandum is contingent upon local sponsor, namely the Department of Environmental Resources of 32.15 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, agreeing in writing to provide without cost to United States all lands, easements and rights-of-way, including suitable borrow and spoil disposal areas as determined by the Chief of Engineers necessary for construction of project; provide a cash contribution equal to appropriate percentage of final construction cost exclusive of lands, easements, and rights-of-way, the percentage to be in accordance with existing law based on shore ownership and use existing at time of construction, and the President's proposed cost-sharing policy, which contribution is presently estimated at $8,400,000 or 35 percent; pay 30 percent of annual beach replenishment costs for the project; hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction works, except for damages due to fault or negligence of Government or its contractors; maintain and operate all the works, including periodic sand replenishment and redistribution as needed, after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army; assure continued public ownership or continued public use, without cost to United States, of appropriate access and facilities including parking and sanitation, necessary for realization of public benefits upon which Federal participation is based, and administer and maintain beach for continued public use during life of project; control water pollution to extent necessary to safeguard health of bathers; and, comply with the applicable provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (Public Law 91-646 approved 2 January 1971) in acquiring land, easements, and rights-of-way for construction and subsequent maintenance of the project and inform affected persons of pertinent benefits, policies, and procedures in connection with said Act. Formal assurances of local cooperation will be requested and executed prior to initiation of construction of improvements. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Beach replenishment as authorized by 1974 WRD Act and extended by the 1976 WRD Act was continued as a total cost of $1,213,343. For its share of cost of improvement, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania contributed $364,286 for a cumulative total contribution of $2,314,286. Preparation of Phase I General Design Memorandum, as authorized by 1976 WRD Act, was continued at a cost of $246,636 with funds provided under the General Investigation appropriation. The Final Phase I General Design Memorandum was completed in August 1981. A hydraulic model study of the plan recommended in the Phase I General Design Memo continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project is 29 percent complete. Since project authorization, Federal participation in first costs for remaining work was changed from one-third share to 70 percent in accordance with provisions of section 103, Public Law 87-874. Construction of project works for shore protection as authorized by 1954 River and Harbor Act was accomplished in two stages by separate contracts. Stage I, completed in October 1956, provided for realignment and removal of steel-sheet pile bulkhead and placing of sandfill. Stage II, completed in September 1957, provided for construction of bulkheads and groins. Modification to six groins was accomplished in 1966. Under the periodic nourishment program authorized by 1960 River and Harbor Act, the first major beach nourishment was completed in 1961. A second major beach nourishment was completed in 1965. Special course sandfill was placed in 1966. Third nourishment was completed in 1969. Fourth and final periodic nourishment of the beach during the 10-year period from year of first major nourishment operation was completed in December 1971. Authority for Federal participation expired in May 1971. Under authority of 1974 WRD Act, Phase I of beach replenishment was completed in June 1975, Phase II was completed in June 1976, Phase III was completed in June 1977, Phase IV was completed in July 1978, Phase V was completed in June 1979, Phase VI was completed in June 1980, and Phase VII was completed in June 1981. In addition to the beach nourishment, three experimental rubblemound breakwaters were constructed offshore from Beach No. 10 in June 1978. In FY 78, initial funds for the preparation of Phase I General Design Memorandum (1976 WRD Act) were provided under the Construction General appropriation and subsequent funding for completion of Phase I General Design Memo were provided under the General Investigations appropriation. Work remaining to complete the project consists of: 1974 WRD Act completion of beach replenishment; and 1976 WRD Act completion of a hydraulic model study of the plan recommended in the Phase I General Design Memorandum. In addition, costs of $257,985 were incurred during fiscal years 1973 and 1974 under Public Law 84-99, Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies Appropriation, for project rehabilitation as a result of damages due to storm and high lake levels. 37.. OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS See Table 32-E. 38. BEACH EROSION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Shoreline erosion control demonstration - Sec. 54 of 1974 Water Resources Development Act, Public Law 93-251. Geneva State Park, Ohio - During the year, a public information brochure was prepared and results from previous years' monitoring was provided for input to the Chief of Engineers Section 54. Program Summary Report at a cost of $21,001 to complete the project at a cumulative cost of $335,844. Beach erosion activity pursuant to Section 103, Public Law 87-874 (preauthorization). Lake Shore Park at Ashtabula, Ohio - Costs of $51,605 were incurred for preauthorization studies. Flood Control 39. CAYUGA CREEK, CHEEKTOWAGA, N.Y. Location. Project area of Cayuga Creek is located in vicinity of Union Road and William Street in town of Cheektowaga, N.Y. Existing project. Provides for (a) concrete tee op right bank beginning at Union Road bridge and extending about 700 feet upstream, two feet of freeboard above 100-year flood stage, (b) about 600 feet of earth levee and 250 feet of concrete wall, with freeboard of three feet for levee and two feet for wall and an additional amount added for velocity head, (c) on left bank beginning at Union Road Bridge and extending 850 feet upstream; on right bank from 700 feet to 850 feet above bridge, and 400 square yards in vicinity of junction of the floodwall along the creek and the transverse levee, (d) removal of earth to bedrock to place tee wall and excavation for bank erosion protection and channel work. Estimated Federal cost for new work is $1,240,000 (Aug. 1981). Project authorized by Chief of Engineers pursuant to Section 205, Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended. Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation state that prior to construction of the plan of improvement, local in- 32-16 BUFFALO, N.Y., DISTRICT terests furnish assurances satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army that they will: a. Provide without cost to the United States, all lands, easements, and rights-of-way necessary for construction and subsequent maintenance of the project works, and State of New York will comply with the applicable provisions of the "Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970," Public Law 91-646, approved 2 January 1971 and prohibit future development within ponding areas; b. Hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction and maintenance of the works except for damages due to the fault or negligence of the Government or its Contractors; c. Take over, maintain, and operate the project after completion, in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army; d. Accomplish, without cost to the United States, all necessary changes in appurtenant utilities, sewers, and specical facilities; e. Regulate the use of the flood plain so as not to degrade or encroach on project capacities or hinder maintenance and operation; and, f. Warning property owners annually that the project does not provide protection against floods greater than the 100-year flood elevation; and, g. Enact and enforce flood plain management regulations between the upstream and downstream project limits, meeting the standards established by the Federal Emergency Management Agency for the National Insurance Program under the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 and Flood Disaster of 1973. Operations and Results during Fiscal Year. Contract for construction was awarded in September 1981. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Report for Cayuga Creek was initiated as an interim report of flood control study for Buffalo Metropolitan Area and completed under authority of Section 205 of Flood Control Act of 1948. Detailed Project Report was approved May 1980. Construction of project remains to be done. Cumulative costs for new work are $187,956. 40. CUYAHOGA RIVER BASIN, OHIO Location. The project is located in northeastern Ohio, in Cuyahoga and Summit Counties, in the Cuyahoga River watershed. (See Geological Survey Map of Cleveland-South.) Existing project. Big Creek flood control improvement project, as developed in reformulation studies, Phase II General Design Memorandum, provides for: (a) relocation of approximately 4,950 linear feet of Baltimore and Ohio railroad mainline and 1,290 linear feet of spurline, construction of embankment for new track and construction of two new railroad bridges, (b) floodway channel, 2,700 feet long from existing channel in Brookside Park to existing channel, upstream from West 25th Street Bridge, including spillway, staged channel and associated work, (c) diversion channel extending 1,000 feet from existing channel, about 140 feet upstream from West 25th Street Bridge to existing channel approximately 300 feet from Protector Products, including two open channel segments, and, (d) modifications to existing channel. Estimated cost (Oct. 1980) for new work is Federal $13,500,000 and non- Federal $3,245,000 for lands, damages and relocations. Existing project was authorized by Section 108 of 1970 River and Harbor Act. Local cooperation. For the Big Creek improvement project local interests must furnish assurances satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army that they will provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights of way, utility and building relocations, and highway and highway bridge alterations necessary for construction of the plan of improvement, hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works; maintain and operate all works after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army; provide guidance and leadership in preventing unwise future development of the flood plain by the use of appropriate flood plain management techniques; and prevent any encroachment on the project flood channels and ponding areas that would decrease the effectiveness of the flood control improvements and, if ponding areas and capacities are impaired, promptly substitute capacities to restore the effectiveness of the flood control project. These items of local cooperation are different than those adopted and agreed to by the Cleveland Metro Park System. The revised Local Cooperation Agreement was formally presented to the Cleveland Metro Park System on 31 July 1980 for enactment. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning was continued at a cost of $72,615. Condition at end of fiscal year. Funds in the amount of $200,000 were appropriated in FY 1973 and FY 1974. These funds were retained pending approval of the early action project by the Secretary of the Army. The funds were released in FY 1976 after the Secretary of the Army approved the project in September 1975. Termination of Pilot Sediment Removal Program was approved on December 9, 1976 as a result of a preliminary investigation that indicated that the program was no longer justified. Completion of engineering and design and construction of improvements remains to be done to complete project. 41. DANSVILLE AND VICINITY, CANASERAGA CREEK, N.Y. Location. In towns of North Dansville and West Sparta, Livingston County, New York (See Geological Survey Map Dansville, N.Y. 1942.) Existing project. Flood control improvements as proposed, Phase I General Design Memorandum, provide for: (a) two levees, 4 feet high, 215 and 285 feet long respectively, extending from each side of Sewage Plant Road to southbound ramps of the Genesee Expressway, (b) steel sheet pile floodwall, 400 feet in length, along right bank between Route 36 bridge and north bridge abutment of Genesee Expressway, (c) steel sheet pile floodwall, 285 feet in length and concrete bank stabilization to provide protection along rightbank between Route 36 bridge and Hartman Road, and (d) removal of Hartman Road bridge and construction of two 15-foot high gravity walls to provide protection and to replace the existing deteriorated bridge abutments. Federal cost for new work $985,000 (Oct. 1981). Non-Federal cost estimate of $28,000 (Oct. 1981) is for lands. Existing project was authorized by Sec. 203 of 1948 Flood Control Act (H.D. 206, 80th Cong., 1st Sess.). Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation state that prior to construction of the plan of improvement, local interests furnish assurances satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army that they will: a. Provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, disposal areas, and rights-of-way necessary for construction of the improvement, presently estimated at $28,000. b. Hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works; c. Operate and maintain the works after completion in ac- 32-17 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 cordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army, including provisions to prevent encroachments on the improved channel; d. In acquiring lands, easements and rights-of-way forconstruction of the project, the State will comply with the applicable provisions of the "Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970," Public Law 91-646, approved 2 January 1971. Formal assurances of local cooperation will be requested upon approval of Phase II Design Memorandum. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning was continued, at a cost of $74,340. Condition at end of fiscal year. Preconstruction planning was initiated in 1954. In 1956, planning indicated that the project was not economically justified and authorized project was classified inactive in January 1957. As a result of tropical storm Agnes in June 1972 and significant Congressional and local interest, the project was reclassified to deferred category in June 1973. Based on recommendations contained in restudy letter report, project was reclassified to active category in August 1974. Cost of letter report was $6,000 with funds provided in FY 1973 under the General Investigation appropriation. Preconstruction planning was completed in FY 81. Flood protection improvements identified in the Phase II GDM remain to be constructed to complete the project. 42. ELLICOTT CREEK, N.Y. Location. The proposed channel improvement is located on the downstream portion of Ellicott Creek in the towns of Amherst and Tonawanda, Erie County. (See Geological Survey maps of Tonawanda East and Buffalo Northeast, N.Y.) Existing project. For detailed description of the original project as authorized by Section 201 of the 1970 Flood Control Act, see page 32-24 of Annual Report for 1973. The basic authorization, as modified by the Water Resources Development Act of 1974 provides authority to undertake flood control measures to alleviate flooding that is compatible with authorized project and any alternatives currently under restudy pursuant to Flood Control Act of 1970. As a result of restudy of alternatives, the project provides for: (a) widening, straightening and deepening about 2.1 miles of existing creek channel including the existing by-pass channel in Ellicott Creek Park; (b) construction of a diversion channel about 5,850 feet long between Maple Road and Millersport Highway; (c) construction of a diversion channel about 1,950 feet long through Pfohl Park; (d) construction of a diversion channel about 9,150 feet long from Niagara Falls Boulevard upstream to about Pfohl Park; (e) construction of 2 highway bridges; (f) modification of culverts at Tonawanda Creek Road; (g) foundation protection of 1 highway bridge; (h) modification of utilities and drainage outlets; and, (i) recreation facilities consisting of a bike and hike path about 5.4 miles long, with open space park areas. The estimated Federal cost of existing project is $13,700,000 (Oct. 1980). The estimated non-Federal cost is $6,940,000 (Oct. 1980) which includes a cash contribution of $290,000. Local cooperation. For details of local cooperation see page 32-22 of Annual Report for 1976. On October 25, 1976, the New York State Department of Conservation furnished a letter of intent to cooperate toward construction of project. Formal assurances will be requested upon completion of Phase II Design Memorandum. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning was continued, at a cost of $151,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. The 1970 Flood Control Act authorized construction of Sandridge Dam and downstream channel improvements. It also stipulated that before any work is initiated, a restudy of alternatives to the dam be undertaken. As a result of Restudy of Alternatives, which was completed in 1973, recommended revisions were submitted in a public notice dated March 18, 1974. Revisions to the project are described in detail in above paragraph, Existing project. The authorization of the 1970 Flood Control Act was modified by the Water Resources Development Act of 1974 to provide for remedial flood control measures compatible with the diversion plan contained in the report of Restudy of Alternatives. Preconstruction planning was initiated in December 1974. Completion of preconstruction planning and construction remains to be done to complete the project. In addition, approximately $311,400 were expended during FY 1977 for emergency work for "Operation Runoff". As a result of record snowfalls during the 1976-1977 winter, advance measures were undertaken to reduce flood damages anticipated from the snowmelt. Work was performed under authority of Public Law 84-99, Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies. 43. MT. MORRIS LAKE, N.Y., GENESEE RIVER Location. Dam is on Genesee River 66.9 miles above river mouth and about 32 miles southwesterly of Rochester, N.Y. Reservoir is in Livingston and Wyoming Counties, N.Y. (See Geological Survey maps of Nunda and Portage, N.Y.) Existing project. For description of existing project as authorized by 1944 Flood Control Act see page 1575 of Annual Report for 1962. New work for completed project cost $23,365,559. In addition $5,000 contributed funds expended for new work. Local cooperation. None required. Local interests contributed $5,000 for new work. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance: Operation and ordinary maintenance of dam, reservoir, and service facilities, condition and operation studies and miscellaneous reports were accomplished by hired labor for $330,904. Debris removal accomplished by contract, cost $161,508. Cooperative stream gaging program accomplished by Geological Survey and Weather Bureau reporting and hydroclimatic networks cost $41,250. Operation of the Water Control Center cost $140,635. Engineering and design costs of $105,677 were incurred for the preparation of a flood emergency plan, log boom design, plans and specifications for debris removal, annual facility inspection, visitor center study, electrical maintenance repairs, trash boom study, dam safety study, and O&M manual for seismic instrumentation. Roofing contract to repair existing buildings cost $13,648. Repairs and replacement of the steel stairs and walkways by contract cost $70,780. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project is complete. Construction of concrete gravity-type dam was initiated by contract March 1948 and completed May 1952. Clearing of reservoir area and construction of all appurtenances are complete. Operations and maintenance of dam, reservoir, and appurtenances are continued annually. 44. POINT PLACE, TOLEDO, OHIO Location. Point Place is located on a peninsula in northeast portion of city of Toledo, Ohio. Its shores are bounded on the east by Maumee Bay of Lake Erie and on the west by Ottawa River. The peninsula extends in a northeasterly direction immediately north of mouth of Maumee River. Existing project. Existing project, as recommended in Phase II General Design Memorandum, provides for: (a) combination of protective structures consisting of 4,400 feet of steel sheet pile wall and 13,700 feet of levee; (b) three new pumping stations and 3,800 feet of new storm sewer facilities; and, (c) facilities for fishing and related recreational activities. Estimated costs (Oct. 1981) are $8,400,000 Federal and $3,650,000 non- 32-18 BUFFALO, N.Y., DISTRICT Federal including a cash contribution of $2,240,000. Existing project was authorized by 1972 Flood Control Act (H.D. 363, 92nd Cong., 2d sess.) Local cooperation. For details of local cooperation see pages 32-24 and -25 of Annual Report for 1978. By letter dated August 27, 1981, the city has indicated that action on the Local Cooperation Agreement will probably be taken in early 1982 after a city payroll tax, which is necessary for the local share of funding, has been enacted. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning was continued at a cost of $250,855. Condition at end of fiscal year. Completion of pre-construction planning and construction remains to be done to complete the project. 45. RENO BEACH--HOWARD FARMS AREA, OHIO Location. Area is located in Lucas County, on the south shore of Lake Erie about 15 miles east of Toledo, Ohio. Existing project. The project, as authorized, provides for construction of 8,200 feet of roadway seawall, consisting of an earth dike, faced on the lakeward side with a quarry-run stone fill; and a steel sheet pile floodwall connecting the easterly end of this seawall at Wards Canal to the existing inland dike paralelling the canal. Estimated Federal cost for new work consisting of one alternative for making a permanent project of the "Operation Foresight" work which was completed in 1973, is $4,530,000 (Oct. 1981). Non-Federal cost estimate of $1,510,000 (Oct. 1981) is cash contribution toward first cost of construction. Project was authorized under provision of Flood Control Act of 1948. (H.D. 554, 80th Congress, 2nd Sess.). Local cooperation. Responsible local interests, prior to construction must furnish assurances satisfactory to Secretary of the Army that they will: Provide a cash contribution in the amount of 25 percent of the construction cost for Plan "A" which is estimated to be $1,510,000. However, the project provides that, if local interests pay the difference in cost, a more costly plan of improvement may be substituted for Plan "A" at the time of construction. The alternate plan provides for construction of an earth dike protected on the lakeward side by a steel bulkhead with steel sheet pile groins along the bulkhead, and for a steel sheet pile bulkhead connecting the end of the shore-dike bulkhead to the existing inland dike paralleling Wards Canal. Provide without cost to the United States all land, easements, rights-of-way, and borrow areas necessary for construction of the project. Make all necessary bridge alterations and provide access to all public bathing beaches at their own expense. Hold and save the United States free from all claims incident to construction and operation of the project except from damages due to the fault of the Government or its Contractors. Maintain the entire protective works after completion including the existing jetties on the east side of Cooley Creek and on the west side of Wards Canal, the bathing beaches, and their protective structures, and a sufficient outlet channel in Wards Canal to carry the free flow into Lake Erie at all times all in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army. Construction shall not be commenced until the non-Federal interest has entered into a written agreement to furnish such cooperation as may be required by the particular project authorization, by the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (P.L. 91-646), or by other law, and such agreement has been approved. Provisions of Section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (P.L. 91-611) requiring a legally enforceable contract regarding local assurances are applicable. A Local Cooperation Agreement will be requested upon approval of the Phase II General Design Memorandum. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Preconstruction planning was continued at a cost of $79,974. Condition at end of fiscal year. Completion of preconstruction planning and construction of project remains to be done. 46. SCAJAQUADA CREEK, N.Y. Location. Scajaquada Creek is a small stream draining to the Black Rock Canal and thence to Niagara River at Buffalo, New York. It flows from east to west and its drainage area is all in Erie County. About 65 percent of the watershed is upstream from the city of Buffalo, mostly in the towns of Cheektowaga and Lancaster, and the village of Depew. (See Geological Survey Maps of Buffalo-Northeast, N.Y. and Lancaster, N.Y.) Existing project. For description of existing project see page 32-23 of Annual Report for 1977. Estimated costs (Oct. 1980) are $5,065,000 Federal and 84,060,000 non-Federal. Existing project was authorized by Section 201 of 1965 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Contract operations for Stage I initiated in April 1978 were completed in October 1978. Contract operations for Stage II initiated in April 1979, were completed at a cost of $3,082,800. Condition at end of fiscal year. Stage I of contract operations initiated in April 1978 were completed in October 1978. Stage II, initiated in April 1979, was completed. In addition, approximately $171,600 were expended during FY 1977 for emergency work for "Operation Runoff." As a result of record snowfalls during the 1976-1977 winter, advance measures were undertaken to reduce flood damages anticipated from the snowmelt. Work was performed under authority of Public Law 84-99, Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies. 47. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspection of completed flood control works for compliance with Federal requirements were made during the period at a cost of 871,817. Total cost to Sept. 30, 1981 was $178,972. 48. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See Table 32-F. 49. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION See Table 32-G. 50. DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS See Table 32-H. 51. SURVEYS During FY 1981, costs of 3,890,421 were incurred as shown below: Navigation Studies $1,078,088 Flood Damage Prevention Studies 973,490 Shoreline Protection Studies $305,373 Special Studies $894,611 Deauthorization Review $237 Coordination Studies $168,529 Phase I GDM Studies $470,093 32-19 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 52. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA During the period, costs of $16,455 were incurred in connection with International Water Studies under the General Investigations appropriation and $118,502 incurred under the Operation and Maintenance appropriation for total costs of $134,957. Flood plain management services were performed during the year at a cost of $212,075. During the year, flood hazard evaluation studies were continued for the Seneca Nation of Indians, NY, and Town of Batavia and Ellicott Creek, Alden, NY. 53. HYDROLOGIC STUDIES Hydrologic studies to provide drainage area information for streams in that portion of New York State under jurisdiction of the Buffalo District were accomplished by U.S. Geological Survey at a cost of $7,167. 32-20 BUFFALO, N.Y., DISTRICT TABLE 32-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 Sept. 30, 1981 1. Ashtabula Harbor, New Work Ohio Approp. - - - - 12,805,339' 2. Barcelona Harbor, N.Y. 3. Black Rock Channel and Tonawanda Harbor, N.Y. 4. Buffalo Harbor, N.Y. 5. Cape Vincent Harbor, N.Y. 6. Cattaraugus Harbor, N.Y. (Contrib. Funds) 7. Cleveland Harbor Ohio 8. Conneaut Harbor, Ohio 9. Dunkirk Harbor, N.Y.. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost 209,577 223,000 222,589 21,125 12,975 1,286,000 1,338,284 705,800 1,126,722 20,000 11,401 60,000 59,672 18,367,000 19,667,686 122,000 121,779 21,562 63 63 7,550 340,000 276,978 20,276 17,884 1,105,000 1,128,477 1,247,613 1,247,363 35,000 31,170 55,000 46,713 150,000 64,878 17,051,500 17,208,896 3,000,000 1,042,579 144,000 130,221 650,000 210,986 13,362 5,265 950,000 685,000 744,154 10,857 20,432 843,000 803,060 934,500 938,245 1,005,000 75,088 37,000 45,082 84,854 5,788,000 6,054,122 5,450,000 7,397,311 215,000 185,800 800,000 1,236,918 25,055 31,473 1,000,000 1,499,407 - 12,805,339' 780,000 7,682,666 780,753 7,677,925 3,665,000 3,665,000 3,663,962 3,663,962 - 1,185,8532 - 1,185,8532 305,506 365,405 292,147 351,079 - 10,515,1203 - 10,515,1203 1,170,000 24,466,348� 990,594 24,225,6824 - 23,115,1875 - 23,115,1875 1,370,000 42,774,8008 1,356,667 42,760,9028 - 295,457 - 295,457 -- 275,082 -- 275,082 380,000 1,507,206 1,287,156 1,471,841 382,500 999,500 208,323 824,384 450,000 450,000 268 3,643,182 4,201,154 1,380,000 1,363,651 474,400 511,609 -19,400 -16,483 20,000 18,485 450,593 31,653,2997 31,653,2997 117,645,0598 117,612,4048 10,294,903 10,268,364 8,346,6419 8,346,641' 5,722,402 '0 5,716,411 '0 651,850 651,850 3,010,02411 3,010,024" 1,422,502 1,419,308 1,950,000 1,950,00012 32-21 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 32-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Total Cost to Text Project Funding FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 Fy 81 Sept. 30, 1981 10. Erie Harbor, Pa. New Work 11. Fairport Harbor, Ohio 12. Geneva-on-the Lake, Ohio 13. Great Sodus Bay Harbor, N.Y. 14. Huron Harbor, Ohio (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 15. Irondequoit Bay, N.Y. 16. Little Sodus Bay Harbor, N.Y. 17. Lorain Harbor, Ohio Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 3,079,000 2,877,908 613,000 613,458 150,000 125,450 25,000 27,504 1,435,000 1,276,889 70,000 70,442 5,781 83,230 114,693 420,595 413,516 3,309 775,000 781,998 1,110,000 1,267,462 922,268 896,751 162,000 133,148 5,122 2,395 210,000 910,718 643,000 481,091 57,298 100,000 86,522 35,114 35,066 164 578,000 566,583 135,000 175,382 425,000 448,004 140,000 149,080 2,000 4,517 1,038 433,000 557,976 110,000 111,633 -5,000 625 -30 439,000 453,703 256,000 253,772 445,000 407,162 210,000 235,727 23,000 22,786 509,000 546,850 125,000 137,817 18,000 15,469 -27,000 -22,990 525,000 519,884 3,597,873 '3 3,597,873 ' 3 11,658,819" 11,652,22714 1,154 1,154 2,959,61115 2,959,61115 10,062,203 10,021,092 662,000 643,405 610,959' 610,959' 2,351,943 2,351,488 713,544 713,544 5,103,795" 5,103,795" 11,607,403 11,605,046 247,030 247,030 63,079 63,079 740,000 738,380 301,394 '8 301,394' 8 3,031,051 3,027,005 742,822 742,822 20,739,558' 9 20,739,499' 17,384,429 17,379,280 32-22 BUFFALO, N.Y., DISTRICT TABLE 32-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Project 18. Oak Orchard Harbor, N.Y. 19. Ogdensburg Harbor, N.Y. 20. Olcott Harbor, N.Y. 21. Oswego Harbor, N.Y. 22. Port Clinton, Ohio 23. Port Ontario Harbor, N.Y. 24. Rochester Harbor, N.Y. 25. Rocky River Ohio 26. Sackets Harbor, N.Y. 27. Sandusky Harbor, Ohio 28. Toledo Harbor, Ohio Funding New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost. New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 - 2ooU4 25,673 15,952 299,387 327,006 22,593 18,292 32,000 37,228 137,000 171,144 734,008 735,343 11,000 10,000 530,000 529,418 4,030,000 3,718,557 12,237 17,058 9,195 11,212 6,764 70,000 70,396 4,822 4,822 90,000 76,984 580,000 576,366 7,564 7,564 1,000 784,123 766,953 2,685,390 2,949,016 BUNFD.YFIAS., TLROI, CT 32-23 3,936 3,889 8,010 2,667 11,463 12,623 32,000 31,621 5,227 5,227 205,000 232,959 1,070,000 575,062 25,000 22,128 7,000 2,955 521,700 416,883 1,554,000 1,654,161 7,897 10,998 45,007 34,913 17,011 8,733 80,000 70,010 37,000 36,654 15,000 16,689 365,000 854,160 840,000 833,557 3,000 6,094 1,040,300 1,157,595 2,388,000 2,377,534 Total Cost to Sept. 30, 1981 1,586,99620 1,586,99620 78,811 76,965 646,4662' 646,4662' 1,319,17122 1,301,54722 140,21023 140,21023 461,90824 446,04124 14,47725 14,47725 8,430,01626 8,430,01626 4,668,81527 4,658,44727 307,590 307,590 71,950 71,950 470,049 460,696 810,00028 809,839 2,439,30829 2,439,30829 10,605,81630 10,596,31130 343,494 343,494 1,562,807 1,553,492 25,0103' 25,0103' 23,639 22,688 6,727,27032 6,727,27032 9,803,199 9,797,794 675,606 675,606 17,191,84233 17,191,84233 55,658,364 54,092,643 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 32-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Total Cost to Text Project Funding FY 78 FY 79 Fy 80 FY 81 Sept. 30, 1981 29, Vermilion New Work Harbor, Ohio Approp. - - - - 1,156,11834 Cost 1,156,11834 Maint. Approp. 100,000 400,000 140,000 67,000 1,330,763 Cost 179,128 118,188 426,459 57,656 1,321,217 Rehab. Approp. - - 139,775 Cost 139,775 30. West Harbor, New Work Ohio Approp. 180,000 90,000 100,000 800,000 1,235,000 Cost 175,502 40,442 143,982 808,224 1,233,005 (Contrib. Funds) New Work Contrib. - - 800,000 800,000 Cost - - - 764,079 764,079 31. Wilson Harbor New Work N.Y. Approp. - - 535,24635 Cost - - 535,24635 Maint. Approp. -53,887 1,959 9,674 25,012 219,62636 Cost 7,699 2,066 3,886 18,802 207,62836 35. Lakeview Park, New Work Lorain, Ohio Approp. 46,770 25,000 70,000 80,000 1,661,470 (Federal Funds) Cost 12,315 54,864 61,801 61,911 1,624,483 (Contrib. Funds) New Work Contrib. - - - - 729,000 Cost 350,714 - - - 729,000 36. Presque Isle New Work Peninsula, Erie, Pa. Approp. 900,000 750,000 750,000 850,000 7,695,562 (Federal Funds) Cost 875,408 757,766 768,870 850,115 7,695,549 (Contrib. Funds) New Work Contrib. 321,429 321,429 321,429 364,286 3,641,426 Cost 321,435 310,675 331,881 364,611 3,640,081 Maint. Approp. - - - - 2,476 Cost - - - - 2,476 39. Cayuga Creek New Work Cheektowaga, NY Approp. 14,000 44,000 53,000 213,000 Cost 58,587 13,168 41,840 30,116 187,956 40. Cuyahoga River New Work Basin, Ohio Approp. 190,000 250,000 87,000 100,000 1,057,000 Cost 207,285 338,340 78,021 72,615 1,013,676 41. Dansville and New Work Vicinity, Canaseraga Approp. 120,000 93,000 75,000 70,000 465,300 Creek, N.Y. Cost 146,260 83,461 82,090 61,164 450,166 42. Ellicott Creek, New Work N.Y. Approp. 398,000 260,000 72,000 150,000 1,669,000 Cost 396,245 257,602 92,928 151,067 1,666,973 43. Mt. Morris New Work Lake, N.Y. Approp. 23,365,55937 Genesee River Cost - - 23,365,55937 Maint. Approp. 690,000 647,000 708,000 890,300 6,140,309 Cost 710,837 666,716 734,473 864,402 6,103,594 44. Point Place New Work Toledo, Ohio Approp. 125,000 300,000 239,000 250,000 1,199,000 Cost 123,469 122,421 415,773 250,855 1,197,506 45. Reno Beach-Howard New Work Farms, Ohio Approp. - - 70,000 80,000 150,000 Cost - - 69,938 74,574 144,512 46. Scajaquada Cr., New Work N.Y. Approp. 790,000 1,030,000 1,715,000 680,000 4,935,307 Cost 848,587 1,105,336 1,843,529 623,276 4,858,084 32-24 1 1 1 BUFFALO, N.Y., DISTRICT TABLE 32-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 1. Includes $565,192 for previous projects. Excludes $47,000 contributed funds. 2. Includes $56,616 for previous projects. Excludes $7,500 contributed funds. 3. Includes $58,027 for previous projects. 4. Includes $4,922 emergency relief authority administrative costs transferred from new work to maintenance upon conversion to programming and budgeting system July 1, 1953, by direction of Office, Chief of Engineers. Also includes appropriations and costs under appropriation titles 96x3123 Operation and Maintenance and 96x5125 Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. 5. Includes $4,277,586 for previous projects. Excludes expenditures of $239,305 for work authorized by Section 107. 6. Includes $1,883,647 for previous projects. Excludes $446,805 contributed funds. 7. Includes $1,564,154 for previous project and appropriations and costs of $16,596 for modification authorized for construction under authority of Sec. 107, 1960 R & H Act. 8. Includes appropriations and costs under appropriation titles 96x3123 Operation and Maintenance and 96x5125 Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other improvements of Navigable Waters. Excludes $201,960 contributed funds. 9. Includes $805,272 for previous projects. 10. Includes $39,784 for previous projects. 11. Includes $811,250 for previous projects. Excludes $11,000 contributed funds. 12. Includes $176,520 for previous projects. 13. Includes $736,967 for previous projects. 14. Includes $104,900 for previous projects. Excludes $154,500 contributed funds. 15. Includes $368,940 for previous projects. 16. Includes $361,772 for previous projects. 17. Includes $269,789 for previous projects. 18. Includes $232,328 for previous projects. 19. Includes $292,203 for new work for previous projects. Excludes $3,000 contributed funds. Also excludes appropriation and cost of $29,570 under authority of Section 107, 1960 R & H Act. 20. Excludes $224,702 contributed funds. 21. Includes $271,380 for previous projects. 22. Includes $130,512 for previous projects. 23. Includes $140,210 for previous projects. Excludes $1,500 contributed funds. 24. Includes $38,959 for previous projects. Excludes $5,000 contributed funds. 25. Excludes $186,000 Public Works Acceleration Act funds. 26. Includes $1,187,977 for previous projects. 27. Includes $945,684 for previous projects. 28. Includes $50,000 for previous projects. 29. Includes $247,794 for previous projects. 30. Includes $617,529 for previous projects and $478 emergency relief authority administration costs transferred from new work to maintenance upon conversion to programming and budgeting system, July 1, 1953, by direction of Office, Chief of Engineers. 31. Includes $6,000 for previous projects. 32. Includes $477,149 for previous projects. Excludes $325,000 contributed funds. 33. Includes $1,624,695 for previous projects. 34. Excludes $740,679 contributed funds. 35. Includes $57,342 for previous projects. Excludes $166,998 contributed funds. 36. Includes $16,914 for previous projects. 37. Excludes $5,000 contributed funds. 32-25 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 32-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Documents June 3, 1896 Mar. 3, 1905 June 25, 1910 Mar. 2, 1919 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Sept. 3, 1954 July 14, 1960 Oct. 27, 1965 Aug. 11, 1888 June 3, 1896 June 13, 1902 June 13, 1902 Aug. 8, 1917 Mar. 3, 1905 July 27, 1916 Mar. 2, 1919 Mar. 2, 1945 32-26 Work Authorized ASHTABULA HARBOR, OHIO (See Section 1 of Text) Construction of breakwater. Enlarge outer harbor by extending west breakwater and constructing new east breakwater; pierheads on lakeward ends of breakwaters; and remove part of old east breakwater. Extend west breakwater to shore; dredge outer harbor to a depth of 20 feet. Remove portion of east breakwater, extend breakwaters to present project dimensions, and dredging restrictions in portion of west basin. Dredge channel through outer harbor, channel of approach to Penn Central Co. slip, channel in Ashtabula River, to and in turning basin, all to present project dimensions; remove portion of old east inner breakwater; and maintenance to 24-foot depth of portion of outer harbor. Extend river channel to present project limit. Dredging approach channel and turning basin in east outerharbor to 25-foot depth. A depth of 29 feet in soft and 30 feet in hard material in entrance channel to just inside outer ends of breakwaters; thence 28 feet in soft and 29 feet in hard material in a channel to inner breakwater; thence 27 feet in soft and 28 feet in hard material in a channel extending to Penn Central Co. slip and extending 2000 feet up Ashtabula River; 22 feet in hard material in turning area; and 28 feet in soft and 29 feet in hard material in areas adjacent to 250-foot section of inner breakwater when that section is removed as now authorized. Dredging approach channel and turning basin in east outer harbor to 28 feet in soft material and 29 feet in hard material. BLACK ROCK CHANNEL AND TONAWANDA HARBOR, N.Y.(See Section 3 of Text) Dredging channel through Horseshoe Reef at outlet of Lake Erie and Tonawanda Inner Harbor, to 16 feet. Deepening Tonawanda Creek to 16 feet. Dredging channel from Buffalo outer harbor to foot of Maryland St., Buffalo, to 21 feet. Dredging channel from foot of Maryland St., Buffalo, to natural deepwater pool upstream from Tonawanda Harbor to 21 feet; construction of ship lock and bridge; and repair of Bird Island pier and towpath wall. Dredging channel along Tonawanda Island, with turning basin at its downstream end at the foot of the Island, to 21 feet. Dredging triangular area at junction with Buffalo north entrance channel. Annual Report, 1895, p. 2132. H. Doc. 654, 61st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 997, 64th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 43, 73d Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 78, 74th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 321, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 486, 83d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 148, 86th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 269, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. Ex. Doc. 83, 50th Cong., 1st sess., Annual Report, 1888, p. 2066, and Annual Report, 1897, pp. 3116- 3120. H. Doc. 143, 56 Cong., 1st sess., and Annual Report. 1900, p. 4152. H. Doc. 125, 56th Cong., 2d sess., and Annual Report, 1901, p. 3343. H. Doc. 428, 58th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 658, 63rd Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 1004, 65th Cong., 2d sess, and H. Doc. 92, 79th Cong., 1st sess. BUFFALO, N.Y., DISTRICT TABLE 32-B (Continued) Acts Sept. 22, 1922 Mar. 3, 1925 June 26, 19346 Aug. 30, 19357 Mar. 2, 1945 Sept. 3, 1954 May 20, 1826 June 23, 1866 June 23, 1874 June 3, 1896 Mar. 3, 1899 Mar. 3, 1909 June 6, 1900 June 13, 1902 Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 2, 190710 June 25, 1910 July 25, 1912 Mar. 2, 1919 Jan. 21, 1927 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 193511 Aug. 30, 1935 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 32-27 Work Authorized Widening channel at foot of Maryland St., Buffalo. Widening canal south of International Bridge and removal of westerly end of Rattlesnake Island shoal. Operation and care of improvements provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors. Removal of rock shoals in Lake Erie entrance to canal, and in canal south of Ferry Street Bridge, to 22 feet; enlargement of North Tonawanda turning basin; extension of Bird Island pier; improvement of guide pier at the lock; and elimination of upper 150 feet of Tonawanda Creek channel from the project. Widening Lake Erie entrance to canal. Deepen lower 1,500 feet of Tonawanda inner harbor and enlarge turning basin. BUFFALO HARBOR, N.Y. (See Section 4 of Text) Construction of south pier (extended in 1868)' Construction of old breakwater.' Extension of old breakwater.' Stony Point and south breakwater.' North breakwater.' Deepening entrance channel to inner harbor and removing rock shoal therein. Dredging at entrance to canals at South Buffalo in outer harbor.' South entrance breakwater.' Extension of Federal project to Commercial St. and removal of Watson elevator site.' Deepening areas A, B, and D in outer harbor to 21 feet, and area C in north entrance to 23 feet. Deepening areas F and G in outer harbor to 21 feet. Removal of shoal between entrance channel to Buffalo River and Erie Basin to 21 feet. Deepening areas H, I, and K in outer harbor to 21 feet. Extension of south entrance and south breakwaters, deepening outer harbor to present project dimensions, and removal of shoals on approach to south entrance. Maintenance of channels in Buffalo River and Buffalo ship canal to 21 feet, in cooperation with city of Buffalo. Documents H. Doc. 981, 66th Cong., 3d sess. H. Doc. 289, 68th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 28, 73d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 92, 79th Cong., 1st sess.s H. Doc. 423, 83rd Cong., 2d sess. ' Annual Report, 1868, pp. 222 and 232. Annual Report, 1868, pp. 232-236. Annual Report, 1876, pt. 2, pp. 569 and 573. Annual Report, 1895, p. 3153. H. Doc. 72, 55th Cong., 1st. sess., and Annual Report, 1897, p. 3245. Specified in acts. Specified in act. H. Doc. 240, 59th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 298, Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 2, 61st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 550, 62d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 1139, 64th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 481, 68th Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 1, 71st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 46, 73d Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 54, 74th Cong., 1st sess. REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 32-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Mar. 2, 1945"1 Documents H. Doc. 352, 78th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc., 151, 86th Cong., 1st sess. July 14, 1960 Oct. 23, 1962 Dec. 15, 1980 Mar. 3, 1899 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 3, 1875 Aug. 5, 1886 Aug. 11, 1888 June 3, 1896 Mar. 3, 1899 June 13, 1902 June 13, 1902 Mar. 2, 1907 June 25, 1910 July 27, 1916 Aug. 8, 1917 Aug. 29, 1937 Aug. 30, 193512 32-28 Work Authorized Deepening North and Buffalo River entrance channels, and deepening and maintaining Buffalo River and Buffalo ship canal to present project dimensions Deepening approach to south entrance channel to 30 feet; deepen to 30 feet in outer area and 29 feet in inner area of south entrance channel; and deepen to 28 feet southerly part of outer harbor. Deepening portion of outer harbor to 27 feet over a width of 500 feet for 2,500 feet northward from 28-foot project area, widening within 1,700 feet to limits within 150 feet of breakwater axis and 75 feet from harbor line and continuing within these limits for 7,000 feet. Elimination of 25-foot wide strip between presently authorized and proposed easterly dredging limits. Elimination of easterly 50-foot wide undredged strip in existing 23-foot depth project area, extending northerly from 27-foot depth area to Buffalo River entrance channel. Previously authorized but uncompleted portions of work authorized by 1935 act, combined with this act as a single improvement. Removal of abandoned abutments of South Michigan Avenue bridge. CAPE VINCENT HARBOR, N.Y. (See Section 5 of Text) Breakwater 1,000 feet long, and shore arm not to exceed 150 feet. Deepening to project dimensions; elimination from project of uncompleted portion of breakwater. CLEVELAND HARBOR, OHIO (See Section 7 of Text) West breakwater Part of east breakwater.' Extension of east breakwater.' Reconstruction of piers.' Dredging channel between piers and outer harbor to depth of 19 feet; dredging to depth of 23 feet in any portion of harbor in discretion of Secretary of War. Arrowhead breakwater and extension of east breakwater. Removal of deflecting arm of old east breakwater and closure of gap between old and new east breakwaters. Pierhead at easterly end of east breakwater. Maintenance and improvement of channels in Cuyahoga and Old Rivers to a depth of 21 feet to a point 2,000 feet upstream from Clark Ave. viaduct and 18-foot turning basin. Deepening outer harbor and channel between piers to present project dimensions, construction of 400-foot spur breakwater at gap in shore arm of west breakwater; removal of easterly 150 feet of west main breakwater; elimination from project of a 298-foot southerly extension of west pier; and abandonment of inner 932 feet of shore arm of west breakwater. H. Doc., 451, 87th Cong., 2d sess. Section 107, 1960 River and Harbor Act. Annual Report, 1897, pp. 3286-3288. H. Doc. 363, 76th Cong. 1st sess.4' '8 Annual Report, 1876, p.558. H. Ex. Doc. 116, 48th Cong., 2d sess., and Annual Report, 1886, p.1865. H. Ex. Doc. 189, 50th Cong., 1st sess., and Annual Report, 1888, p. 2005. H. Doc. 326, 54th Cong., 1st. sess., and Annual Report, 1896, p. 2949. H. Doc. 156, 55th Cong., 3d sess., and Annual Report, 1899, pp. 3075 and 3078. H. Doc. 118, 56th Cong., 2d sess. No printed report. H. Doc. 891, 63d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 707, 63d Cong., 2d sess., and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 84, 74th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 477, 72d Cong., 2d sess. BUFFALO, N.Y., DISTRICT TABLES 32-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized Aug. 30, 193511 Mar. 2, 19451' July 24, 1946 July 3, 1958 July 14, 1960 Oct. 23, 1962 Dec. 6, 1966 Oct. 22, 1976 (Sec. 175) June 25, 1910 Aug. 8, 1917 17 Maintenance dredging in Cuyahoga and Old Rivers for 1 year as an emergency measure. Maintenance of extension of Cuyahoga River channel. Extension, maintenance, and improvement to a depth of 21 feet of Cuyahoga River channel to present project limit.s,5l 1 Improvement of Cuyahoga and Old Rivers to a depth of 23 feet and replacement or pier construction of 7 railroad bridges. 2 Deepening channel 25 feet through east basin of outer harbor; replacement of Erie- Lackawanna Railroad bridge over Cuyahoga River at mile 4.1 and widening of channel at that point, with elimination of reconstruction of east pier of bridge as previously authorized; and replacement of Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Bridge over Old River near its mouth and Willow Avenue Highway Bridge about 800 feet above mouth and widening channel at four locations along lower 2,000 feet of river.3 Depth of 29 feet in lake approach to main entrance; 28 feet in entrance channel to lakeward ends of piers at mouth of Cuyahoga River; 27 feet in river to a point just above its junction with Old River, and in Old River to upstream limit of present 23-foot project; 28 feet in west basin within existing project limits as modified to eliminate a triangular area at west end and to extend limits to a line parallel to and 75 feet from harbor line; and 28 feet in westerly 800 feet of east basin. 25 An area in east basin 27 feet deep extending about 3,800 feet easterly of 28-foot area with project limits 380 feet from east breakwater and on landward side generally by a line 75 feet lakeward of and parallel to harbor line. A dock channel to Nicholson Cleveland Terminal Co. pier, at easterly end of east basin, from 25-foot contour to a limit 75 feet north of pierhead line, 400 feet wide at shoreward end and flared toward the lake. Deepening upper end of Old River channel from 21 to 27 feet. Preparation of Phase I design memorandum for improvements consisting of removal of portions of entrance breakwater; construction of breakwater extension at east entrance; deepening approach and entrance channels; construction of diked disposal area; and, installation of recreational fishing facilities on west breakwater. CONNEAUT HARBOR, OHIO (See Section 8 of Text) Extension of east breakwater, construction of new west breakwater; removal of portion of old west breakwater; and dredging of outer harbor to 19 feet. Realinement of west breakwater; removal of remainder of old west breakwater, and deepening outer harbor to 20 feet. Removal by Bessemer & Lake Erie R.R. Co. of inner 635 feet of west pier. 32-29 Acts Documents Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 39, 74th Cong., 1st sess. Specified in act. H. Doc. 95, 79th Cong., 1st. sess. H. Doc. 629, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 107, 85th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 152, 86th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 527, 87th Cong., 2d sess.� Sec. 107, 1960 River and Harbor Act. H. Doc. 653, 61st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 983, 64th Cong., 1st sess. REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 32-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Aug. 30, 1935" Oct. 23, 1962 Nov. 7, 1966' Mar. 2, 1827 Mar. 2, 1867 June 3, 1896 June 25, 1910 June 30, 1948 Dec. 15, 1970 (House Public Works Comm.) June 22, 1971 (Senate Public Works Comm.) Sec. 201 of F.C. Act of 1965 Removal of a portion of west breakwater; extension of breakwaters to present project dimensions; construction of pierheads on outer ends of breakwaters; deepening outer harbor to present project dimensions; removal of portions of river pier, and elimination from project of a 255-foot shoreward extension of west breakwater. Deepening easterly part of outer harbor to 28 feet in soft material and 29 feet in hard material; deepening remaining triangular area of outer harbor to 22 feet in soft material and 23 feet in hard material; deepening inner harbor for 2,450 feet upstream of outer end of west pier to 27 feet in soft material and 28 feet in hard material; removal of east pier; extension of east breakwater to shore; and an access channel 8 feet deep in outer harbor to city dock. Previously authorized but uncompleted portion of work authorized by 1917 and 1935 acts combined with this act for accomplishment as a single improvement. Recreational small-boat harbor provided by: a stone dike about 2,200 feet long; access channels 6 feet deep, 2,800 feet long and 100 feet wide; closing of 100-foot gap in existing west breakwater; and personnel guard rail on west breakwater. DUNKIRK HARBOR, N.Y. (See Section 9 of Text) Construction of west pier.' 8 Breakwater and excavation of entrance channel to 13 feet.' Deepening of entrance channel and harbor basin to a depth suitable for vessels of 16-foot draft. Removal of rock reef bordering the inner entrance channel. Deepening outer entrance channel to present project depths; removal of rock shoal on the west side of the entrance channel to a depth of 17 feet, and changed limits of the inner entrance channel and basin to present project dimensions. Construction of small boat harbor. H. Doc. 48, 73d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 415, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 484, 89th Cong., 2d sess. 4 S. Ex. Doc. 42, 35th Cong., 1st sess., and Annual Report, 1866, pt. IV, p. 155 Annual Report, 1871, p. 214. H. Doc. 63, 54th Cong., 1st. sess. H. Doc. 720, 61st Cong., 2d sess.4 H. Doc. 632, 80th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 91-423, 91st Cong., 2d sess. ERIE HARBOR, PA. (See Section 10 of Text) Breakwaters and piers; dredging entrance channel; and brushwood protection of beach of Presque Isle Peninsula.' Deepening channel and harbor basin to 18 feet; repair and extension of piers; and plant growth and emergency protection work on peninsula. Deepening channel and part of harbor to 20 feet. Reconveyed Presque Isle Peninsula to the State of Pennsylvania for park purposes. Annual Report, 1915, p. 1965. H. Doc. 70, 55th Cong., 1st sess. and Annual Report, 1896, p.3 2 3 7.19 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 26, 61st Cong., 2d sess. 32-30 May 26, 1824 Mar. 3, 1899 June 15, 1910 Nov. 28, 192220 BUFFALO, N.Y., DISTRICT TABLE 32-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 Sept. 3, 1954 July 14, 1960 H. Doc. 52, 73d Cong., 1st sess. Deepening, widening, and straightening entrance channel, dredging channel at easterly end of harbor basin, deepening a portion of harbor basin, all to present project dimensions; elimination of north breakwater from project; and limitation of south breakwater to a length of 1,200 feet. Protection of the peninsula south of the waterworks settling basin. Widen 25-foot deep approach channel to ore dock. Depth of 29 feet in the entrance channel to a point opposite the inner end of the north pier; thence 28 feet in soft and 29 feet in hard material in the remainder of the entrance channel, within the general limits of the 25-foot basin and inner channel opposite the ore dock except as modified to eliminate from the project a triangular area along the easterly side; and a depth of 28 feet over a 300-foot westward extension of the 25-foot basin.29 Depth of 27 feet in soft material and 28 feet in hard material in approach area to Duquesne Marine Terminal. Previously authorized but uncompleted portion of work authorized by 1935 act is combined with this act as a single improvement. FAIRPORT HARBOR, OHIO (See Section 11 of Text) Construction of piers. Breakwaters and dredging outer harbor to a depth of 18 feet. 1,400-foot extension of east breakwater, present project dimension of east pier; and deepening of harbor to 19 feet. 4,000-foot extension of east breakwater at limit of cost to the United States of $715,000. Deepening of outer harbor and entrance channel to present project dimensions; extending the west breakwater to present project dimensions with pierhead at its outer end; removal of west pier; and construction of bulkhead on west side of river channel. Dredging of 21- and 24-foot river channels and turning basin in Grand River to present project dimensions. Dredging of 8-foot river channel. Depth of 29 feet in the approach channel from the lake; a depth of 28 feet over a width of 800 feet in the outer harbor; a depth of 27 feet in soft and 28 feet in hard material in Grand River, over a width of 200 feet to the upstream limit of the turning basin, with suitable widening at the bends, thence over widths reducing from 200 to 100 feet to the upstream limit of the existing Federal project, except in the 8-foot channel; enlargement of the turning basin, including deepening of the entire basin to 21 feet; and minor modification of the existing project limits in the outer harbor. 32-31 Specified in act. H. Doc. 345, 83d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 199, 86th Cong., 1st sess.' H. Doc. 340, 87th Cong., 2d sess.' Annual Report, 1889, pp. 2147-2153 H. Doc. 347, 54th Cong., 1st sess. and Annual Reports, 1896, p.2956; 1903, p. 2084; 1905, p.23 4 9. H. Doc. 206, 63d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 592, 69th Cong., 2d sess., Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 13, 70th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc 472, 72d Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 79, 74th Cong., 2d sess.' H. Doc. 706, 79th Cong., 2d sess.4 H. Doc. 347, 86th Cong., 2d sess.' Oct. 23, 1962 Mar. 3, 182521 June 3, 1896 Mar.3, 1905 Mar. 2, 1919 Jan. 21, 1927 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 193522 Aug. 26, 1937 July 24, 1946 July 14, 196030 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 32-B (Continued) Acts AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized Construction of small boat harbor. H. Doc. 627, 94th Cong., 2d sess. May 10, 1977 (House Public Works Comm.) Oct. 1, 1976 (Senate Public Works Comm.) Sec. 201 of F.C. Act of 1965 Mar. 2, 1829 Aug. 2, 1882 Mar. 3, 1925 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Annual Report, 1876, pt. II p. 589. Annual Report, 1881, p. 2442. H. Doc. 192, 68th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 17, 70th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 23, 72d Cong., 1st sess GREAT SODUS BAY HARBOR, N.Y.(See Section 13 of Text) Construction of piers and breakwater.9 Extension of piers to 15-foot contour in the lake. Deepening and widening of channel to 18-foot depth and 150-foot width. Widening channel lakeward of piers to 250 feet. Dredging channel to present project dimensions. HURON HARBOR, OHIO (See Section 14 of Text) Extension of west pier; construction of east breakwater; removal of part of old east pier; deepening of channel to 19 feet; and dredging of sheltered area. Widening river to 200 feet; removal of remainder of old east pier; construction of new spur pier; enlargement of sheltered area; and closure of breach at shore end of west pier. Extension of west pier with pierhead at its outer end; removal of outer end of east breakwater and constructing pierhead on new outer end; widening and deepening channel to present project dimensions; enlargement of turning basin at head of channel; shore protection west of west pier; and elimination from project construction of spur pier and dredging sheltered area outside channel limits. Depths of 29 feet in approach channel, 28 feet in entrance channel, 27 feet in river channel, 21 feet in turning basin, a detached breakwater 1,575 feet long 2,000 feet lakeward of outer end of existing west pier; and, abandonment of lakeward end of existing approach channel.3 1 LITTLE SODUS BAY HARBOR, N.Y. (See Section 16 of Text) Text) West entrance pier.' Extension of west pier and construction of west breakwater, and dredging channel 12 feet deep, 400 feet wide.' East pier and east breakwater.' Extension of piers lakeward to 15.5-foot contour, and dredging channel to 15.5 feet. Extension of east pier 300 feet lakeward. Annual Report, 1874, p. 256. Annual Report, 1874, p. 256. Annual Report, 1871, p. 234. Annual Report, 1881, pp. 2444 and 2446. Annual Report, 1901, p. 3364. 32-32 Documents H. Doc. 122, 58th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 5, 63d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 478, 72d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 165, 87th Cong., 1st sess.' Mar. 3, 1905 Mar. 2, 1919 Aug. 30, 193522 Oct. 23, 1962 Aug. 30, 1852 June 23, 1866 Mar. 3, 1871 Mar. 3, 1881 June 13, 1902 BUFFALO, N.Y., DISTRICT TABLE 32-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Documents Mar. 3, 1899 Mar. 2, 1907 June 25, 1910 Aug. 8, 1917 Aug. 8, 1917 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 July 14, 1960 Oct. 27, 1965 June 25, 1910 Mar. 2, 1919 Aug. 30, 1935" Mar. 2, 1867 Mar. 4, 1913, 32-33 Work Authorized LORAIN HARBOR, OHIO (See Section 17 of Text) Breakwaters and extensions of piers to present dimensions. Extend 18-foot channel from inner end of piers to Erie Avenue Bridge. Extend breakwaters and dredge to depth of 19 feet in outer harbor. Extend breakwaters to present project dimensions. Deepen outer harbor and river channel to Erie Avenue Bridge to 20 feet. Extend 20-foot channel to American Shipbuilding Co. drydock 2. Widen 2 bends in river and enlarge turning basin opposite National Tube Co. dock."2 Approach channel to municipal pier. Deepen outer harbor and river channel to American Shipbuilding Co. drydock 2 to present project dimensions and extension of river channel to upper end of National Tube Co. dock with turning basin opposite that dock. Maintenance dredging in Black River from American Shipbuilding Co. drydock 2 upper end of National Tube Co. dock was authorized Apr. 7, 1934, by Public Works Administration. Enlarging turning basin opposite National Tube Co. dock to present project dimensions. Turning basin in bend of Black River immediately upstream from Baltimore & Ohio RR coal dock. Replace Norfolk and Western Railway swing bridge with a vertical lift bridge; construct two detached arrowhead breakwaters lakeward of existing breakwaters; construct extension of east breakwater to shore; remove 300 feet of lakeward end of west breakwater; remove outer 1,100 feet of east pier; deepen lake approach to 29 feet, 800-foot wide outer harbor channel to 28 feet, southwesterly portion of outer harbor to 25 feet and river channel to 27 feet; widen river channel at bends; and construct a new turning basin 21 feet deep near upstream limit of existing project.32 Construct bank of stabilization works at cut numbered 1 along left bank of river channel above Erie Avenue Bridge.' OGDENSBURG HARBOR, N.Y. (See Section 19 of Text) Deepening the several channels to 19 feet. Widening upper entrance channel to 400 feet, and city front to 350 feet. Enlarging and deepening lower basin to 21 feet, and removal of elevator wharf. OLCOTT HARBOR, N.Y. (See Section 20 of Text) Dredging a channel 11 feet deep between parallel piers� Deepening channel to 12 feet and maintenance of west pier. H. Doc. 131, 55th Cong., 2d sess. and Annual Report 1898, p. 2718. H. Doc. 560, 60th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 644, 61st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 980, 64th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 985, 64th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 587, 69th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 469, 72d Cong., 2d sess. Senate Committee print, 73d Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 51, 74th Cong., 1st sess. Specified in act. H. Doc. 161, 77th Cong. 1st sess. H. Doc. 166, 86th Cong., 1st sess. PL 89-298. H. Doc. 920, 60th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 663, 64th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 266, 72d Cong., 1st sess.' 24 Annual Report, 1866, pt. III, p. 15 and pt. IV, p. 158. H. Doc. 780, 62d Cong., 2d sess.' REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 32-B (Continued) Acts AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized July 11, 1870 Mar. 2, 1907 July 3, 1930 Annual Report, 1870, pp. 54, 220. and 221. H. Doc. 55, 58th Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 24, 71st Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 7, 74th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 96, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 722, 80th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 487, 81st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 471, 87th Cong., 2d sess. OSWEGO HARBOR (See Section 21 of Text) Construction of outer west breakwater. 9 Repair of outer west breakwater under Plan (A). 9 Construction of arrowhead breakwaters; deepening outer harbor between arrowhead breakwaters, west outer harbor east of Erie-Lackawanna coal dock, and Oswego River north of Seneca St., to 21 feet; and deepening west outer harbor, west of Erie-Lackawanna coal dock, to 16 feet.26 Widening channel to harbor lines in Oswego River north of Seneca St. Closing gap in west breakwater; deepening west outer harbor, west of east line of Erie-Lackawanna coal dock, to project depth.33 Construction of east outer breakwater; removal of inner end of east arrowhead breakwater; and dredging channel and basin in east outer harbor. 27 Construction of detached breakwater at harbor entrance and removal of shoals in approach to harbor entrance to 25 feet deep. Depth of 27 feet in lake approach channel; 25 feet deep in outer harbor channel 800 feet wide from entrance gap to a turning basin 25 feet deep about 750 by 1,100 feet, at mouth of Oswego River; depth of 24 feet in earth and 25 feet in hard material in river channel from turning basin to upstream end of Port of Oswego Authority's east side terminal, a distance of about 1,600 feet; relocation of Federal project limits in Oswego River upstream of 24-foot channel to Federal project limit at north line of West Seneca St., on lines parallel to 50 feet channel ward of established harbor lines; elimination of maintenance of inner west breakwater; and, elimination of modification authorized by River and Harbor Act of 1948. PORT CLINTON HARBOR, OHIO (See Section 22 of Text) Parallel stone and pile jetties at mouth of river, east jetty 2,200 feet long and west jetty 1,980 feet long extending to 10-foot contour in lake. Channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide for outer 4,200-foot length and 200 feet wide for inner 800-foot length to Highway Bridge. ROCHESTER HARBOR, N.Y. (See Section 24 of Text) Construction of piers." Extension of piers to 15 foot contour in the lake. Concrete superstructure on piers. 9 Deepening channel to 20 feet. Dredging of the entrance channel and turning basin, and the elimination of the inner ends of the east and west piers, all to present project dimensions. Maintenance of the existing channel upstream of the Penn Central Co. bridge. Depth of 24 feet in the channel from the lake to the west pier; a depth of 23 feet between the piers and in the lower river to the Penn Central Co. bridge, including the existing turning basin; a depth of 21 feet from the bridge to the upstream project limit, with suitable widening at the bends; and, an upstream turning basin 21 feet deep and 650 feet wide adjacent to the improved channel, with two mooring dolphins. 32-34 Documents Annual Report, 1875, p. 295 Annual Report, 1874, p. 247. Annual Report, 1881, p. 2437. Annual Report, 1905, p. 2383. H. Doc. 342, 61st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 484, 72d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 139, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 409, 86th Cong., 2d sess. 4 Aug. 30, 1935 Oct. 17, 1940 June 30, 1948 Sept. 3, 1954 Oct. 23, 1962 June 10, 1872 Mar. 2, 1829 Aug. 2, 1882 June 25, 1910 Aug. 30, 19356 Mar. 2, 1945 July 14, 1960 BUFFALO, N.Y., DISTRICT TABLE 32-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents June 10, 1872 Aug. 26, 1937 Oct. 27, 1965 Aug. 2, 1882 Aug. 13, 1888 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 3, 1899 June 13, 1902 Mar. 2, 1919 Jan. 21, 1927 Aug. 30, 193528 Mar. 2, 1945 July 14, 1960 Mar. 3, 1899 June 25, 1910 ROCKY RIVER HARBOR, OHIO (See Section 25 of Text) East pier and dredging of channel. Extension of east pier and deepening channel to present project dimensions. Realign and extend channel and construct an anchorage basin. SACKETS HARBOR, N.Y. (See Section 26 of Text) Deepening harbor area to 12 feet. Construct timber crib mooring place, and brush and stone jetty. Build 2 stone groins (OCE-June 8, 1896) Deepening to project dimensions. SANDUSKY HARBOR, OHIO (See Section 27 of Text) Construction of channel protection works. Widening of straight and dock channels and deepening to 19 feet. Extension of east jetty to total length of 6,000 feet, with pierhead on outer end; deepening of the outer, straight, and easterly portion of dock channels to 21 feet, and westerly portion of dock channel to 20 feet. Deepening of dock channel to 22 feet. Enlargement of turning basin and construction of rock dike. Maintenance of bay channel to 22 feet; and elimination from project of portion of turning basin and rock dike. Extending Moseley channel and deepening that channel and the outer end of Straight channel to 26 feet, from deep water in the lake to the vicinity of Cedar Point dock; widening the bend at the junction of the Moseley and Straight channels and deepening to 26 feet; deepening the Straight Channel to 25 feet from the vicinity of Cedar Point dock to junction with Bay channel; deepening the Bay channel from junction with the Straight channel to the outer end of the Pennsylvania coal dock No. 3 to 25 feet, thence from outer end of the coal dock to the turning basin to 24 feet in soft material and 25 feet in hard, with no Federal dredging within 50 feet of the dock; and enlarging the turning basin, including removal of approximately 300 feet of the rock dike, and deepening to 24 feet in soft material and 25 feet in hard. TOLEDO HARBOR, OHIO (See Section 28 of Text) A Channel 400 Feet Wide and 21 Feet Deep from 25-Foot Contour in Maumee Bay to Fassett Street Bridge, 200 Feet Wide and 19 Feet Deep Above that Point and a 500-Foot Turning Basin at Upper End. A stone Revetted Earth Dike in Maumee Bay Channel. Act 1899 Modified to Insure a Navigable Channel to 21 Feet from Fassett Street Bridge to Lake. 32-35 Annual Report, 1871, p. 211. H. Doc. 70, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 352, 88th Cong., 2d sess.4 Sen. Ex. Doc. 29, 47th Cong., 1st sess. Annual Report, 1888 pt. III, p. 2086. Annual Report, 1896, pt. III, p. 3160. H. Doc. 732, 79th Cong., 2nd sess.4' 35 H. Doc. 362, 55th Cong., 2d sess., and Annual Report, 1898, p. 2708. H. Doc. 120, 56th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 982, 64th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 584, 69th Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 2, 73d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 328, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 144, 86th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 198, 55th Cong., 2d Sess. and Annual Report 1898, p. 2693. H. Doc. 865, 60th Cong., 1st sess. REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 32-B (Continued) Acts Aug. 30, 1935 May 17, 1950 Sept. 3, 1954 July 3, 1958 July 14, 1960 July 4, 1836 Mar. 3, 1875 Mar. 3, 1905 July 3, 1958 Mar. 2, 1945 Aug. 13, 1968 Sept. 3, 1954 July 14, 1960 Mar. 7, 1974 Oct. 22, 1976 (Sec. 101) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 32-36 Work Authorized Channel 25 Feet Deep and 500 Feet Wide from 25- Foot Contour to Mouth of Maumee River (300 Feet Wide on Each Side of Center Dike in Bay Channel), Thence 400 Feet Wide to Fassett Street Bridge, 200 Feet Wide Above That Point and a Turning Basin at Upper End 18 Feet Deep. Widening at Bend of Mouth of River Opposite Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Dock. Removal of Center Dike in Maumee Bay Channel. Enlarge Widening at Bend Opposite Chesapeake and Ohio Dock and Turning Basin Opposite American Shipbuilding Co. Dock. Deepen Bay Channel Including Widenings to 28 Feet, Deepen River Channels to New York Central Railroad Bridge to 27 Feet and Construct New Turning Basin Below Anthony Wayne Bridge.3 4 VERMILION HARBOR, OHIO (See Section 29 of Text) Parallel piers and dredging channel to 8 feet deep. Deepening of channel to 12 feet. Reconstruction of piers. New entrance formed by two overlapping arrowhead breakwaters and extension of existing river channel upstream to Liberty St. Bridge. WILSON HARBOR, N.Y. (See Section 31 of Text) Entrance channel 80 feet wide and 8 feet deep; and restore east and west piers. Extend existing channel 300 feet; and construct new channel 3,800 feet long through Tuscarora Bay. PRESQUE ISLE PENINSULA, ERIE, PA. (See Section 36 of Text) Construction of groin system, seawall, bulkhead, placement of beach material at waterworks reservation and along remainder of peninsula; removal of portions of existing structures. Periodic nourishment of shore for a 10-year period. Periodic nourishment of shore for a 5-year period. Preparation of Phase I design memorandum for improvements consisting of construction of five sections of spaced off-shore breakwaters and replenishment of beach area with sandfill. Documents Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 21, 72d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 189, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 620, 81st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 436, 84th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 153, 86th Cong., 1st sess.4 Annual Report, 1880, p. 2122. Annual Report, 1874, p. 219. H. Doc. 252, 58th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 231, 85th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 679, 76th Cong., 3d sess. H. Doc. 112, 90th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 231, 83d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 397, 86th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 796, 93d Cong., 2d sess. BUFFALO, N.Y., DISTRICT TABLE 32-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 1. Authorized by Public Works Administration, Sept. 6, 1933. 2. Widening Cuyahoga River at downstream and of Cut 4 classified inactive. 3. Replacement of bridges 19 and 32, widening Cuyahoga and Old River Channels, classified deferred. 4. Contains latest published map. 5. Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. 6. Authorized May 28, 1935 by Emergency Relief Administration Act of 1935. 7. Improvement of guide pier at Black Rock lock was deauthorized by Congress in August 1977. 8. Classified deferred. 9. Completed under previous projects. 10. Also Sundry Civil Act of Mar. 3, 1905. 11. Authorized in part by Public Works Administration, Sept. 6, 1933. 12. Authorized by Public Works Administration Sept. 6, 1933. 13. Previously authorized by Public Works Administration. 14. First Deficiency Appropriation Act approved April 1, 1944. 15. Authorized by Defense Plant Corp., May 19, 1942. 16. Deepening left half of channel extension was eliminated from project by 1962 R&H Act. 17. Permit of Secretary of War, Aug. 5, 1927. 18. Modified 1828 and 1852. 19. Extension of north pier portion of this modification is classified deferred. 20. Public 366. 21. Modified 1830, 1881, and 1890. New work completed under previous projects. 22. Partly included in Public Works Administration program, Nov. 15, 1933. 23. First supplemental National Defense Appropriation Act, 1944, approved Dec. 23, 1943. 24. Removal of remaining hard-material shoals in lower basin is classified inactive. 25. Deepening remainder of Cuyahoga River from bridge 1 to and including Old River, classified deferred. 26. Deepening a 200-foot strip along harbor line east of mouth of Oswego River is classified inactive. 27. Modification eliminated by River and Harbor Act of Oct. 26, 1962. 28. Included in Public Works Administration program, Nov. 15, 1933. 29. Deepening strips adjacent to north and south piers classified deferred. 30. Modification classified inactive. 31. Construction of breakwater classified deferred. 32. Deepening and widening remainder of Black River channel at Cut 1 classified deferred. 33. Deepening to 22 feet a 150-foot wide strip in west outer harbor deauthorized in May 1981. 34. The 27-foot project extended 2,800 feet and turning basin relocated under authority of Chief of Engineers. 35. Deauthorized in May 1981. 32-37 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 32-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Section 33 of Text) For Last Cost to September 30, 1981 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Aquatic Plant Control 1974 $ 1,137 - Big (Cunningham) Creek, Ohio' -2 19,7633 - Black River Harbor, N.Y.' _2 42,401 Cattaraugus Creek, N.Y.S _2 57,410 - Elk Creek Harbor, Pa.' 1978 101,500 Grasse River (Massena), N.Y.4''7 1891 9,0003 - Hamlin Beach Harbor, N.Y.' 1973 72,052 - Kelleys Island, Ohio 1974 '5 129,874 Little River at Cayuga Island, N.Y.' 1969 46,8043 42,355 Maumee River, above Toledo, Ohio 7 187315 12,000 - Morristown Harbor, N.Y.' 1949 6,221 9,65612 Niagara Remedial Works, N.Y."'1' 1966 6,069,395 510,819 Niagara River, N.Y.16 1964 559,457" 141,059 Ottawa River Harbor, Michigan and Ohio1" 197715 99,000 - Port Bay, N.Y. Pultneyville Harbor, N.Y.13 1934 68,219 20,087 Put in Bay, Ohio 195115 51,609 12,532 Sandusky River, Ohio4 1894 58,0003 557 1. No commerce reported. 2. Only information available is in index to reports of Chief of Engineers. 3. Amount includes maintenance; not separable. 4. Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st Sess. 5. Abandonment recommended in Ex. Doc. 16, 35th Cong., 1st Sess. 6. Project classified deferred. 7. Channel improved by local interests. 8. Includes local interests' contribution of $25,742. 9. Completed. 10. Costs of operation and maintenance of this project will be settled directly by concerned power agencies. No further appropriations will be made to this project. 11. Includes local interests contribution of $27,563. 12. Includes local interests contribution of $5,000. 13. Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 375, 64th Cong., 1st Sess. 14. Project classified inactive. 15. Annual Report for Detroit District. 16. Construction of compensating works as authorized by 1930 R&H Act was deauthorized by Congress in August 1977. 17. Project deauthorized by Congress in Nov. 1977. 32-38 BUFFALO, N.Y., DISTRICT TABLE 32-D NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Section 34 of Text) Snagging and Clearing for Navigation (Sec 3, 1945 River and Harbor Act, P.L. 14, 79th Congress) Project and Location Fiscal Year Cost Turtle Creek, Port Clinton, OH $6,745' 1. Locals have contributed $17,550. Navigation Activities Pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (Preauthorization) Study Identification Fiscal Year Cost Ogdensburg Harbor, N.Y. $39,663 South Michigan Ave. Bridge, Buffalo, N.Y. $159,540 Mitigation of Shore Damages Attributable to Navigation Projects (Section 111, Public Law 90-483) Study Identification Fiscal Year Cost Lorain, OH $21,024 Vermilion Harbor, OH 41,887 32-39 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 32-E OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 37 of Text) For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Cleveland and Lakewood, Ohio: Edgewater Park' - White City Park' Fair Haven Beach State Park, Lake Ontario, N.Y.2 Fort Niagara State Park, N.Y.3 - Hamlin Beach State Park, N.Y.' 1976 $1,769,600 - Selkirk Shore State Park, Lake Ontario, N.Y.' 1963 58,978 $2,946 1. Project authorized by River and Harbor Act of September 3, 1954 is classified as deferred. 2. Project authorized by River and Harbor Act of July 3, 1958 is classified as deferred. 3. Project authorized under provisions of Section 201, 1965 Flood Control Act is classified inactive. 4. Federal participation was limited to one-third of first cost when project was authorized by 1954 River and Harbor Act. Federal participation was changed from one-third to 70 percent of remaining work under Public Law 87-874. Uncompleted portion of project is classified as deferred. 5. Project completed. 32-40 BUFFALO, N.Y., DISTRICT TABLE 32-F OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 48 of Text) For Last Cost to September 30, 1981 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Auburn, N.Y. Owasco Outlet' 1962 $ 371,9857 - Batavia and vicinity, Tonawanda Creek, N.Y.' 1957 335,385 - Caledonia, Genesee River, N.Y. 1950 - - Camp Perry, Ohio' 196713 275,00012 - Chittenango Creek and tributaries, N.Y. ,' 1948 12,464 - Eastlake, Ohio, Chagrin River' 1976 506,344 - Fremont, Ohio, Sandusky River' 1976 8,589,824" - Hammondsport, Oswego River Basin, N.Y.2 1951 18,691' - Ithaca, N.Y., Cayuga Inlet' 1978 3,929,330' - Lackawanna, N.Y., Smokes Creek' 1971 3,542,068' - Lancaster, Cayuga Creek, N.Y.' 1954 797,300 - Marsh Creek, Geneva, N.Y.' - 226,429 - Montour Falls, Oswego River Basin, N.Y.' 1954 1,681,785 - Onondaga Creek, Nedrow, N.Y."', 1964 330,231 - Ottawa, Ohio 196713 - - Owasco Inlet and Outlet, Montville and Dry Creek, State Ditch and Crane Brook, N.Y.' 1950 281,559 - Red Creek, N.Y.4 1975 361,241 - Reno Beach-Howard Farms, Lucas County, Ohio 195313 4,467 - Syracuse, Oswego River Basin, N.Y.' 1954 3,349,248 - Warsaw, N.Y., Oatka Creek" 1969 558,3170 - Wellsville, N.Y., Genesee River' 1978 3,145,303" - 1. Completed. trol and Coastal Emergencies Appropriation, incurred for project 2. Project classified deferred. rehabilitation as a result of damages due to storm Agnes, June 1972. 3. Local interests required to contribute $25,000. 11. Includes local interests contribution of $6,944. Excludes costs 4. Project not considered economically justified and is inactive, of $383,786 under Public Law 84-99, Flood Control and Coastal 5. Inactive portion of work for State ditch has been done by local Emergencies Appropriation, for emergency restoration of levees interests and work on Crane Brook has been deferred at the request of damaged during 1973. local interests. 12. Includes local interests contribution of $125,000. 6. Project authorized by Chief of Engineers. 13. Annual Report for Detroit District. 7. Excludes costs of $188,732 under Public Law 84-99, Flood Con- 14. Includes local interests contribution of $99,000. Excludes trol and Coastal Emergencies Appropriation, incurred for project costs of $104,005 under Public Law 84-99, Flood Control and Coastal rehabilitation as a result of damages due to storm Agnes, June 1972. Emergencies Appropriation, incurred for project rehabilitation as a 8. Excludes costs of $6,766 under Public Law 84-99, Flood Con- result of damages due to storm Agnes, June 1972. trol and Coastal Emergencies Appropriation, incurred for project 15. Includes local interests contribution of $50,000. Excludes rehabilitation as a result of damages due to storm Agnes, June 197g. costs of $374,042 under Public Law 84-99, Flood Control and Coastal 9. Includes local interests contribution of $50,000. Emergencies Appropriation, incurred for project rehabilitation as a 10. Excludes costs of $26,807 under Public Law 84-99, Flood Con- result of damages due to storms. 32-41 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 32-G FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Section 49 of Text) Flood control activities pursuant to Sec. 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress as amended (preauthorization) Study Identification Fiscal Year Cost Buffalo River, Buffalo, N.Y. $ 7,388 Chagrin River, Willoughby Hills, OH 34,394 Conesus Lake Outlet, N.Y. 139,130 Euclid Creek, Ohio 50,696 Limestone Creek, Fayetteville, N.Y. 7,418 Oneida Creek, Oneida, N.Y. 169,203 Salmon Creek, Hilton, N.Y. 6,048 W. Br. Limestone Creek, N.Y. 106,376 Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., as amended by Sec. 206 of Flood Control Act of 1962) Project Federal Cost Disaster preparedness $70,178. Emergency operations -88,512 TOTAL -$17,794 Snagging and clearing of navigable streams and tributaries in interest of flood control. (Sec. 208, 1954 Flood Control Act, PL. 780, 83rd Cong.) Project and location Fiscal Year Cost Grand River, Mesopotamia, OH $736 32-42 BUFFALO, N.Y., DISTRICT TABLE 32-G (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Section 49 of Text) Emergency bank protection (Sec. 14 of 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Cong.) Study Identification - Cattaraugus Creek at NY Thruway, NY Crawford Creek, Belfast-Caneadea, NY Genesee River, Amity, NY Keshequa Creek, Nunda, NY Mentor Beach Park, OH Mentor on the Lake, OH State University at Oswego, NY 1. Includes $375,000 contributed by local interests. 2. Project completed. Fiscal Year Cost $607,516 ,2 168 19,233 15,698 122,765 64,159 1,904 32-43 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 32-H DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS (See Section 50 of Text) Authorization Date Project Type Act Deauthorized Black Rock Channel and Tonawanda Harbor, NY Navigation 1935 R&H Act' Aug. 1977 Black Rock Channel and Tonawanda Harbor, NY Navigation 1954 R&H Act May 1981 Crane Creek State Park, OH Beach Erosion 1962 R&H Act Nov. 1979 Erie Harbor, PA Navigation 1945 R&H Act Aug. 1977 Grandview Bay Harbor, NY Navigation 1945 R&H Act Aug. 1977 Great Sodus Bay Harbor, NY Navigation 1962 R&H Act Aug. 1977 Ithaca, NY - Cascadilla Creek Flood Control 1941 FC Act Aug. 1977 Ithaca, NY - Fall Creek Flood Control 1941 FC Act Aug. 1977 Maumee River above Toledo, Ohio Navigation 1872 Act Nov. 1977 Niagara River Compensating Works, NY Navigation 1930 R&H Act Aug. 1977 Oswego Harbor, NY Navigation 1940 R&H Act2 May 1981 Sackets Harbor, NY Navigation 1945 R&H Act May 1981 Sheffield Lake Community Park, Ohio Beach Erosion 1962 R&H Act Aug. 1977 Watkins Glen, NY Flood Control 1941 FC Act Aug. 1977 1. Extension of guide pier only, other improvements completed. 2. Deepening of west outer harbor; other improvements completed. 32-44 LOS ANGELES, CALIF., DISTRICT* This district (total area, aLut 226,000 square miles) comprises those drainage bas: n tributary to the Pacific Ocean that are in California between the Mexican boundary and Cape San Martin (about 265 miles north of entrance to Los Angeles Harbor); lower Colorado River drainage basin (below Lee Ferry, Ariz.), which is in southeastern California, southeastern Nevada, southwestern Utah, western New Mexico, and all of Arizona, except the northeastern corner; that part of the Great Basin that is in southern Nevada and southeastern California; and the United States parts of those small drainage basins in southern Arizona and southwestern New Mexico west of the Continental Divide that drain southward into Mexico. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Channel Islands Harbor, Calif. ......... Los Angeles and Long Beach Harbors, Calif. ............................ Marina del Rey, Los Angeles County, Calif. . .............. .... .......... Newport Bay Harbor, Calif. ........... Oceanside Harbor, Calif. .................. Redondo Beach Harbor (King Harbor), Calif. .......................... San Diego River and Mission Bay, Calif. ................ .............. Santa Barbara Harbor, Calif. ............. Ventura Marina (Ventura Harbor), Calif. ....................... Reconnaissance and condition surveys .................. ............... Other authorized navigation projects ................................... Beach Erosion Control Imperial Beach, San Diego County, Calif. ......... .............. Oceanside, San Diego County, C alif. ..................................... Inspection of completed beach erosion control projects ................... Other authorized beach erosion control projects ....................... Flood Control Alamo Lake, Bill Williams River, Ariz.............. ............ Allenville, Ariz . ............... .......... Cucamonga Creek, Santa Ana River Basin, Calif. .................... Gila River Basin, Ariz.: .................. Indian Bend Wash, Ariz............... Painted Rock Dam (Gila River), Ariz ....................... ............... Phoenix, Ariz., and vicinity (including New River) .................. Page 33-2 33-2 33-3 33-3 33-4 33-4 33-5 33-5 33-5 33-6 33-6 33-6 33-6 33-6 33-7 33-7 33-7 33-7 33-8 33-8 33-9 33-9 *All cost and financial statements are listed at the end of this chapter. chapter. Flood Control (Cont'd) Page 19D. Tucson diversion channel, Ariz............. 33-10 19E. Whitlow Ranch Dam, Queen Creek, Ariz. .............. ............... 33-10 20. Goleta, Calif., and vicinity ............... 33-10 21. Los Angeles County drainage area, Calif . ............................. 33-11 22. Lytle and Warm Creeks, Santa Ana River Basin, Calif ................... 33-13 23. Mojave River Dam, Mojave River Basin, Calif . ....................... 33-13 24. Pine and Mathews Canyons Dams, Colorado River Basin, N ev . ...................... .............. 33-13 25. San Luis Rey River, San Luis Rey River Basin, Calif. .................... 33-14 26. Santa Ana River Basin (and Orange County), Calif...................... 33-14 27. Santa Maria Valley levees, Santa Maria River Basin, Calif. .................................... 33-15 28. Santa Paula Creek channel and debris basins (including Mud Creek), Santa Clara River Basin, Calif. ............................ 33-15 29. Sespe Creek at Fillmore, Ventura County, Calif. .................... 33-15 30. Sweetwater River, Sweetwater River Basin, Calif ....................... 33-16 31. Inspection of completed flood control projects ............................ 33-16 32. Scheduling flood control reservoir operations ................................. 33-16 33. Other authorized flood control projects ............... .. .. .............. 33-16 34. Flood control work under special authorization ...................... 33-16 General In cestigations 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 19A. 19B. 19C. Surveys .................. ............... 33-16 Collection and study of basic data ..................................... 33-16 Research and development ............... 33-16 All other tables are referenced in text and also appear the end of this 33-1 35. 36. 37. REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 Navigation 1. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR, CALIF. Location. On coast of southern California about a mile northwest of existing harbor of Port Hueneme, 65 miles northwest of Los Angeles Harbor, and 345 miles south of San Francisco. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 5007 and 5202.) Existing project. A harbor for light-draft vessels and beach erosion control works. Ventura County, sponsor of project, requested modification of document plan of harbor improvement and submitted a modified plan that was approved and adopted by Chief of Engineers in 1957. The harbor, which provides facilities for berthing and servicing about 640 small craft and commercial fishing boats, includes an entrance channel 20 feet deep, 300 feet wide, and 1,650 feet long-protected by two parallel entrance jetties 1,270 and 1,300 feet long; an entrance basin 20 feet deep, 300 to 750 feet wide, and 1,750 feet long; an inner basin 10 feet deep, 900 to 1,400 feet wide, and 1,200 to 2,000 feet long; and a side basin 10 feet deep, 100 to 250 feet wide, and 900 feet long. About 6,238,000 cubic yards of dredged material from entrance channel, interior basins, and sand trap were deposited in feeder-beach area to restore downcoast shoreline. A 2,300-foot-long offshore breakwater was placed to form a sand trap in conjunction with jetties. About 2,000,000 cubic yards of material are to be dredged each biennium from sand trap formed by jetties and breakwater. This material will be deposited along the downcoast shoreline as long as the area remains under Federal oivnership or use and requires beach erosion control. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 5.4 feet. Extreme range is about 9 feet. Federal first cost of new work on completed project as modified was $5,123,345 (excluding $1,361,668 Navy funds and cost to Coast Guard for installation of aids to navigation). Map of modified plan is in "Design Memorandum No. 1, General Design for Harbor and Shore Protection Works Near Port Hueneme, California," prepared by Los Angeles District in May 1957. The U.S. Navy is to bear 19 percent of the cost of maintenance dredging. (See table 33-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. One thousand and eight hundred boat slips in 6 marinas, with restroom and shower facilities; dry storage area for 300 boats with 3-ton and 1-ton hoist facilities; 2 marine construction and repair yards with 5-ton travel lift and 35-ton hoist to 70-ton boatway haulout capacities; a fuel dock facility; a sport-fishing complex; 5 restaurants; 2 coffee shops; 800 waterfront apartments-many with adjoining slips; 274 motel units; 4 yacht club buildings; 3 public convenience docks; a 40-slip transient boat complex; a harbor administration building/harbor patrol office. and dock complex; a marine emporium complex, housing a chandlery store, a sail loft, a delicatessen, a fishing tackle shop, yacht sales, a marine engine repair facility, and an adjacent dock complex; a 7-lane free access public launch ramp, with paved parking for cars and trailers; a boaters' convenience center; a commercial fishing pier and hoist; 2 large public parks; and a fire station. Waterway-connected and north of the harbor is Mandalay Bay, a private keys-type waterfront homes development with an area for about 500 homes and connected dockage for boats. Transition from harbor to Mandalay Bay is restricted by a 4-lane high-rise bridge with a clearance height of 29 feet at high tide. Operations and results during fiscal year. Completed contract payment for maintenance dredging of sand trap and entrance channel at a cost of $89,007 regular funds and $23,078 Navy funds. Awarded contract for maintenance dredging. Administered rights-of-way acquisition completed by local interests. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was started in February 1959. Construction of north and south jetties was completed in June and September 1959, respectively. Construction of detached breakwater was completed in October 1960. Original harbor dredging was completed in August 1961. Last biennial maintenance dredging was initiated in August 1979 and was completed in April 1980. Contract for maintenance dredging was awarded in September 1981. 2. LOS ANGELES AND LONG BEACH HARBORS, CALIF. Location. On coast of southern California in San Pedro Bay about 25 miles south of City of Los Angeles, about 96 miles northwest of San Diego Harbor, and about 410 miles southeast of San Francisco Harbor. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 5147.) Previous projects. For details, see page 1977 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1646 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. A stone breakwater 11,152 feet long (San Pedro breakwater) extending eastward from Point Fermin; a stone-and-earth detached breakwater 18,500 feet long (middle breakwater); a stone-and-earth detached breakwater 13,350 feet long (Long Beach breakwater); maintenance of original Long Beach breakwater south of outer end of pier A (now an integral part of pier A as extended); an entrance channel 1,000 feet wide and 40 feet deep to outer Los Angeles Harbor, with a turning basin 3,500 feet long and 1,500 feet wide of same depth opposite end of pier 1, and enlargement of entrance to inner harbor by dredging to a depth of 35 feet a triangular area at junction of inner harbor with this turning basin; irregular anchorage areas (areas A and B) 40 feet deep adjacent to 40-foot-depth entrance channel; an inner harbor channel (Los Angeles channel) 35 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide, with a turning basin at its north extremity 35 feet deep; a channel (East Basin channel) 35 feet deep and 650 feet wide extending from turning basin to slip 5; a channel (Cerritos channel) 35 feet deep and 400 feet wide from slip 5 to a turning basin in Long Beach inner harbor; a turning basin 35 feet deep in Long Beach inner harbor; an entrance channel to Long Beach inner harbor 35 feet deep and 300 to 500 feet wide; a settling basin at mouth of Los Angeles River diversion channel, dredged material to be deposited on the beaches eastward therefrom to Belmont pier; a silt-diversion channel (Los Angeles River) for protection of Los Angeles and Long Beach Harbors; and maintenance of entire project, except siltdiversion channel. Dredging to a depth of 35 feet in East Basin was authorized as a modification of existing project in 1954. Dredging to a depth of 35 feet in West Basin was authorized as a further modification of existing project in 1960. As authorized in 1976, existing project was further modified to provide for depths of 45 feet in all inner harbor channels and basins of Los Angeles Harbor and in the Los Angeles entrance channel, and to provide maintenance for the new dimensions. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Range between mean lower low water and mean 33-2 LOS ANGELES, CALIF., DISTRICT higher high water is 5.5 feet. Extreme range is about 10 feet. Approved estimated (1981) first cost for project as modified is $65,316,000, comprising $30,545,000 Federal (including $45,000 for Coast Guard costs) and $34,771,000 non-Federal. (See table 33-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. All items of local cooperation required under the terms of the previous authorizing acts have been fully complied with. Under the terms of the 1976 Water Resources Development Act, local interests must provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way for construction and subsequent maintenance of project and for aids to navigation, including suitable spoil-disposal areas and necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads, and embankments therefor or costs of such retaining works; hold the United States free from damages due to construction and maintenance of project; provide and maintain adequate public terminal and transfer facilities, open to all on equal terms; provide and maintain depths in berthing areas and local access channels serving the terminals commensurate with depths provided in related project areas; accomplish such alterations as required in sewer, water supply, drainage, and other utility facilities; contribute in cash 4.1 percent of Federal first cost of dredging project channels, such contribution to be made in a lump sum prior to construction; establish regulations concerning discharge of pollutants into waters of the harbors by users thereof, which regulations shall be in accordance with applicable laws or requirements of Federal, State, and local authorities responsible for pollution prevention and control; and prohibit erection of any structure within 125 feet of project channels and basins. Terminal facilities. In Los Angeles Harbor, 81,852 feet of wharves, of which 74,845 feet are owned by the city and 7,007 feet are owned by private interests. In Long Beach Harbor, 108,065 feet of developed wharves and bulkheads. The city owns 48,465 feet of developed wharves and bulkheads and 32,290 feet of undeveloped rock dikes. Private interests own 9,840 feet of developed wharves and 16,970 feet of undeveloped dikes. Federal Government owns 18,587 feet of developed wharves and bulkheads. Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued channel and basin dredging (1976 modification of existing project) at a cost of $8,523,313 regular funds; $365,188 required contributed funds; and $15,628,412 other contributed funds. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was completed in April 1964, except for dredging a small part of the East Basin, which was included in the 1976 modification of existing project and was later deauthorized in January 1978. Supplemental final environmental statement was filed with Environmental Protection Agency in April 1980. Contract for channel and basin dredging (1976 modification of existing project) was awarded in September 1980 and is about 42 percent complete. 3. MARINA DEL REY, LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIF. Location. On coast of southern California, Santa Monica Bay in Los Angeles County, 20 miles northwest of Los Angeles Harbor and 390 miles southeast of San Francisco Bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 5101 and 5144.) Existing project. A harbor for light-draft vessels at Marina del Rey. The harbor as modified, which provides for protected berthing facilities for about 6,500 small craft and facilities for parking 2,500 trailer-mounted craft, includes an entrance channel, with north and south side revetments, a main channel, north and south entrance jetties, 8 side basins, with 6 intervening moles, and an offshore breakwater. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Range of tide between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 5.6 feet. Extreme range is about 11 feet. First cost of new work for completed project as modified was $8,477,504, comprising $4,238,752 Federal (excluding $42,000 for U.S. Coast Guard costs) and $4,238,752 non-Federal. Map of modified plan is in addendum 1 to "Design Memorandum No. 1, General Design for Playa Del Rey Inlet and Harbor, Venice, Calif.," prepared by Los Angeles District in November 1956. This modified plan was further modified to conform to the 1959 master plan of local interests and to provide an offshore breakwater as an additional protective structure for the harbor. For further project description, see page 1353 of Annual Report for 1966. (See table 33-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. About 5,878 boats are presently berthed in 20 operating anchorages, which afford 5,878 berths. A Coast Guard station with a permanently assigned 82-foot cutter; a firefighting detachment with a fire boat, a reserve fire boat, a pumper, and a ladder truck; and a harbor patrol with 5 patrol boats and 5 auxiliary vessels are on 24- hour duty. Two fuel docks, one on each side of the main channel, are operational. A 10-lane public launching ramp with parking for 261 cars and trailers; dry storage for 396 trailer-borne boats; and several commercial hoists are in operation, as well as 2 haul-out yards, one containing a 100- ton and 60-ton marine travel lift. Two hotels, 2 motels, a ship chandlery, a fisherman's village shopping and tourist center, 28 restaurants, several snack bars, 5 coffee shops, and 5 yacht clubs are called the Marina home port. About 5,886 apartments are almost fully occupied; and additional residential/transient facilities are being planned, including a total of 900 rooms in 3 high-rise hotels. The Marina will ultimately have slips for about 6,000 boats and dry storage for about 2,000 more. Operations and results during fiscal year. Awarded contract for, initiated, and completed maintenance dredging at a cost of $919,094 regular funds and $114,000 required contributed funds. In addition, a reconnaissance and condition survey was completed at a cost of $169. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was started in February 1958. Construction of jetties, which are in good condition, was completed in November 1958; and construction of bases for navigation aids was completed in September 1959. Dredging was completed in April 1962; and revetment, in May 1962. Construction of offshore breakwater, together with bases for navigation aids, was completed in April 1965. Last maintenance dredging was initiated in April 1981 and was completed in June 1981. 4. NEWPORT BAY HARBOR, CALIF. Location. On coast of southern California 24 miles southeast of Los Angeles and Long Beach Harbors, and 72 miles northwest of San Diego Harbor. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1508.) Previous projects. For details, see page 1400 of Annual Report for 1936. Existing project. Plan provides for rubblemound entrance jetties, 900 feet apart, 1,620 and 2,860 feet long on the east and west sides of the channel, respectively; an entrance channel 20 feet deep and 500 feet wide; a main channel 20 feet 33-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 deep, 700 feet wide just inside the entrance, narrowing to a general width of 350 feet; an anchorage area 20 feet deep, about 3,800 feet long, and ranging in width up to 520 feet on the north side of the main channel in the eastern end of the bay; an anchorage area 20 feet deep, about 5,200 feet long, and ranging in width up to 600 feet on the south side of the main channel in the eastern end of the bay; a yacht-anchorage area 15 feet deep, 1,200 feet wide, and 1,700 feet long on the south side of the main channel midway of the bay; the Newport channel 15 feet deep, about 6,000 feet long, and ranging in width up to 330 feet; a turning basin 20 feet deep, about 2,000 feet long, and ranging in width up to 1,000 feet at the western end of the bay; and a depth of 10 feet in the remainder of the main bay area. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 5.3 feet. Extreme range is about 10 feet. Latest approved estimated Federal (1958) first cost for project is $2,038,000. (See table 33-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. All items of local cooperation required under the terms of the previous authorizing acts have been fully complied with. Under the terms of the 1945 River and Harbor Act, local interests must contribute $255,000 to the first cost; provide suitable areas for placement of dredged material for the initial work and subsequent maintenance; and hold the United States free from damages due to construction and maintenance of project. Terminal facilities. A public wharf 300 feet long; 10 privately operated marine railways; and 7 privately operated vertical hoists for the construction and servicing of small craft. Operations and results during fiscal year. Awarded contract for and initiated maintenance dredging at a cost of $227,375 regular funds and $7,000 other contributed funds. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project is about 76 percent complete. Work remaining consists of widening the main channel; deepening the Newport channel; and dredging the north and south anchorages. Last major maintenance work was to repair the entrance jetties in November 1948. Maintenance dredging was initiated in September 1981 and is about 99 percent complete. 5. OCEANSIDE HARBOR, CALIF. Location. On coast of southern California at Oceanside, about 30 miles north of City of San Diego. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 5101.) Existing project. Maintenance of general navigation features of Del Mar Boat Basin constructed by U.S. Navy and of Oceanside Harbor constructed by local interests. These features include approach channel common to Del Mar Boat Basin and to Oceanside Harbor 700 feet long, 750 feet wide, and 20 feet deep; and entrance channel to Del Mar Boat Basin 3,800 feet long and 20 feet deep, with widths ranging from 300 to 400 feet. Other features, which involve Oceanside Harbor only, are (a) entrance channel 2,000 feet long, 250 feet wide, and 20 feet deep; (b) irregularly shaped turning basin 400 feet maximum width, 900 feet long, and 20 feet deep; (c) a south harbor channel ranging from 100 to 150 feet wide, 1,950 feet long, and 15 feet deep; (d) a north harbor channel with widths up to 400 feet, 850 feet long, and 10 feet deep; (e) 1,000 feet of a south jetty 1,375 feet long; (f) a north groin 710 feet long; and (g) 1,200 feet of stone revetment adjacent to turning basin and entrance channel. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 5.3 feet. Extreme range is about 10 feet. The cost of maintenance dredging is to be borne equally by the U.S. Navy and the Corps of Engineers. (See table 33-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for maintenance to date. Terminal facilities. Berthing for 828 boats (718 slips, 76 side-ties, 28 visitors slips, and 6 dry storage spaces at Oceanside Marine Center); a fuel dock; a boat hoist; a launching ramp, which can accommodate 4 launchings at the same time; parking for 1,684 cars; temporary parking for about 144 boat trailers; a boat-repair facility; a pump-out facility; a Coast Guard cutter, restaurants; retail stores; yacht brokers; a boatel/motel; condominiums; and a sport-fishing facility. Operations and results during fiscal year. Awarded contract for, initiated, and completed maintenance dredging at a cost of $960,586 regular funds; $1,160,000 other contributed funds; and $960,586 Navy funds. Condition at end of fiscal year. The groin extension was completed in June 1968 and the jetty extension was completed in July 1968. South jetty sealing was completed in August 1968. Last maintenance dredging was initiated in February 1981 and was completed in June 1981. 6. REDONDO BEACH HARBOR (KING HARBOR), CALIF. Location. On coast of southern California in southern (downcoast) part of Santa Monica Bay about 18 miles northwest of Los Angeles and Long Beach Harbors and about 417 miles southeast of San Francisco Bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 5101 and 5144.) Existing project. Reconstruction of about 1,455 feet of original (north) 2,400-foot stone breakwater; construction of a 2,830-foot extension of original breakwater; construction of a south breakwater 600 feet long; and maintenance of original breakwater as reconstructed, the breakwater extension, and south breakwater. Modification of existing project to provide greater protection from heavy wave action was authorized in 1964. The modification included raising crest height of 2,050 feet of north breakwater from plus 14 feet mean lower low water to plus 22 feet mean lower low water and sealing that part of north breakwater to plus 9 feet mean lower low water. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. In Santa Monica Bay, range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 5.6 feet. Extreme range is about 10 feet. Federal first cost of new work on completed project as modified was $4,766,898 (excluding $20,000 for Coast Guard costs). Map of modified plan is in "Design Memorandum No. 2, General Design for Redondo Beach King Harbor, Calif.," prepared by Los Angeles District in March 1964. (See table 33-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Consist of 3 boat basins containing 1,500 small boat slips; outer harbor containing 80 moorings; limited dry boat storage facilities; fuel dock; sewage pumpout station; 3 boat hoists; launching ramps for hand carried boats; boat repair facilities; sport fishing pier, with facilities for the on- and off-loading of passengers from vessels for hire; and a commercial/recreational pier just outside the harbor. Operations and results during fiscal year. Initiated preparation of plans and specifications for repair of north breakwater. 33-4 LOS ANGELES, CALIF., DISTRICT Condition at end of fiscal year. Reconstruction of existing breakwater was initiated in May and was completed in October 1956. Construction of south breakwater was initiated in November 1956 and was completed in January 1957. Extension of existing breakwater was initiated in October 1956 and was completed in May 1958. Construction of breakwater modification was initiated in May and was completed in November 1964. Construction of concrete baffles in basins Nos. 1 and 2 was initiated in August 1976 and was completed in April 1977. Plans and specifications for repair of north breakwater were initiated in September 1981 and are about 50 percent complete. 7. SAN DIEGO RIVER AND MISSION BAY, CALIF. Location. The San Diego River has its source on the tableland in the Cuyamaca Mountains near Santa Ysabel, California, and flows southwestward 52 miles to the Pacific Ocean at the City of San Diego. Mission Bay Harbor is adjacent to the outlet of the San Diego River, 77 miles southeast of Los Angeles and Long Beach Harbors and 8 miles north of San Diego Harbor. Existing project. A leveed flood channel 800 feet wide, with a capacity of 115,000 cubic feet per second, from 0.4 mile above Morena Boulevard, 3.3 miles directly to the ocean; an altered railroad bridge over the leveed river flood channel; an entrance channel about 5,200 feet long, 670 feet wide, and 20 to 25 feet deep into Mission Bay; in the bay, a main channel and turning basin about 2,700 feet long, 1,000 feet wide, and 20 feet deep, and two anchorage basins, one about 3,200 feet long, 600 feet wide, and 15 feet deep, and the other about 1,600 feet long, ranging from 800 to 1,800 feet wide, and 20 feet deep; three jetties at the entrance; and stone revetment for the banks of the entrance and main channels and turning basin. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 4.4 feet. Extreme range is about 10 feet. Approved estimated (1981) first cost is $37,100,000 (includes allowance for estimated inflation through construction period), comprising $19,600,000 Federal and $17,500,000 non-Federal. This project modified the flood control project: "San Diego River Basin, California" (See H. Doc. 635, 77th Cong., 2d sess.) (See table 33-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. None, with the exception of mooring facilities for recreational craft and commercial sport-fishing boats only. Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued preparation of supplemental project plan. Continued preparation of final environmental statement. In addition, a reconnaissance and condition survey was conducted at a cost of $7,701. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was completed in September 1959. Remedial work was completed in September 1970. Final environmental statement is about 45 percent complete. Supplemental project plan is about 45 percent complete. 8. SANTA BARBARA HARBOR, CALIF. Location. On coast of southern California 90 miles northwest of Los Angeles Harbor and 320 miles southeast of San Francisco Harbor. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 5261.) Existing project. Maintenance dredging of depths existing in 1934 in harbor formed by breakwater constructed by local interests. See page 1014 of Annual Report for 1969 for detailed description of 1962 authorized modification. Further modification was authorized in December 1970 (Public Law 91-611) to provide for dredging and maintenance of existing project by the United States. Also, see Annual Report for 1971 for detailed description of previous authorized maintenance. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 5.4 feet. Extreme range is about 10 feet. Latest approved estimated (1969) first cost for project as modified is $6,810,000, comprising $3,480,000 Federal (including $40,000 for Coast Guard costs) and $3,330,000 non-Federal (including cash contribution of $3,320,000). Prior to adoption by Congress, work was authorized by Public Works Administration. (See table 33-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. See page 1015 of Annual Report for 1969 for items of local cooperation under 1962 authorized modification of existing project. Terminal facilities. A wharf 2,000 feet long; a pier 325 feet long in harbor for tie-up mooring for Coast Guard cutter; a landing float; an open mooring and slip anchorage for small craft; and a launching ramp for small craft. Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued maintenance dredging at a cost of $819,502 regular funds. Condition at end of fiscal year. Last maintenance dredging was completed in June 1979. Three-year contract for maintenance dredging was awarded in December 1979 and is about 65 percent complete. Work on modified project plan is inactive. 9. VENTURA MARINA (VENTURA HARBOR), CALIF. Location. On coast of southern California about 65 miles northwest of the City of Los Angeles, about 70 miles northwest of Los Angeles and Long Beach Harbors, and about 6 miles northwest of Channel Islands Harbor. Existing project. Maintenance of general navigation features of Ventura Marina, constructed by local interests, consisting of a north jetty 1,254 feet long; a middle jetty 250 feet long; a south jetty 1,071 feet long; and an entrance channel 1,750 feet long, 300 feet wide, and 20 feet deep. Existing project was modified by construction of an offshore breakwater 1,500 feet long; dredging about 800,000 cubic yards to form a sand trap in the lee of the breakwater; and construction of recreational fishing facilities on the jetty crests. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 5.4 feet. Extreme range is about 10 feet. First cost of new work for completed project as modified was $3,420,375, comprising $1,711,539 Federal (excluding $40,000 for Coast Guard costs) and $1,708,836 non-Federal. (See table 33-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Two fuel docks; guest berthing docks; 3 boat-repair facilities, 1 with a 60-ton travelift; 1 full service with a 150-ton marine elevator, and 1 do-it-yourself boatyard with a 20-ton travelift, Fisherman's Pier, with 3 50-ton jib cranes for off-loading commercial fishing vessels; flake ice manufacturing and distribution system; 3 wholesale fish buying stations; a retail fish market; offshore oil industry crew transportation; 1,462 boat slips; a dry storage area for 155 boats; a 3-lane deluxe launch ramp; 2 yacht clubs; an 33-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 international helicopter maintenance base; a restaurant and cocktail lounge; a carpenter shop; sport fishing; sightseeing cruises; 3 yacht sales; marine communications; 3 marine chandleries; 3 public restroom buildings; a harbor administration building/harbor master's office; paved jetties with handrails for sport fishing; and headquarters and visitor center for Channel Islands National Park. Under construction are 194 slips for commercial fishermen and transient guests; Fisherman's Quay recreational complex, with 4 restaurants and 26 marine related ancilliary businesses; Marine Center, with 18 outlets for goods and services; and Marine Arts and Science Center, with fisheries training facilities. Plans are under way for constructing a saltwater aquarium and a 230-room resort hotel. Operations and results during fiscal year. Awarded contract for and initiated emergency dredging of entrance channel and sand trap at a cost of $977,183 regular funds. Awarded contract for maintenance dredging. In addition, a reconnaissance and condition survey was conducted at a cost of $5,714. Condition at end of fiscal year. Dredging sand trap was completed in December 1971. Breakwater construction was completed in February 1972. Final environmental statement was filed with Council on Environmental Quality in March 1972. Construction of recreational facilities was completed in February 1973. Last maintenance dredging of entrance channel and sand trap was completed in November 1979. Contract for emergency dredging was awarded in March 1981 and is about 99 percent complete. Contract for maintenance dredging was awarded in September 1981. 10. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS See table 33-C. 11. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS See table 33-D. Beach Erosion Control 12. IMPERIAL BEACH, SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIF. Location. On coast of southern California at Imperial Beach in San Diego County. Existing project. Plan as modified by Chief of Engineers in August 1979 provides for a submerged offshore breakwater about 5,000 feet long, extending southward from northern groin; extension of northern groin about 100 feet to connect with breakwater; and a groin about 600 feet long from shoreline to southern end of breakwater. Approved estimated (1981) first cost for project as modified is $5,150,000, comprising $2,900,000 Federal (including $30,000 for Coast Guard costs) and $2,220,000 non-Federal. Map of modified plan is in "Design Memorandum No. 4, General Design Memorandum, Imperial Beach Erosion Control Project, San Diego County, California," prepared by Los Angeles District in September 1978. (See table 33-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Contribute in cash 43 percent of total project first cost, exclusive of cost for aids to navigation; provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; control water pollution to extent necessary to safeguard health of bathers, except that pollution involving international cooperation, meeting all current Federal, State, and local water quality regulations; maintain protective measures during useful life of project; maintain continued public ownership of beach and its administration for public use during useful life of project; hold the United States free from damages due to construction and maintenance of project, except damages due to fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; provide and maintain access roads, parking areas, and other public use facilities, open to all on equal terms; and comply with requirements of Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (Public Law 91- 646). Operations and results during fiscal year. Initiated preparation of plans and specifications. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of groin No. 1 was initiated in July and completed in September 1959; construction of groin No. 2 was initiated in December 1960 and completed in January 1961; and construction of extension to groin No. 1 was initiated in May and completed in July 1963. Final environmental statement was filed with Environmental Protection Agency in July 1979. Plans and specifications are about 80 percent complete. 13. OCEANSIDE, SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIF. Location. On coast of southern California at Oceanside in San Diego County. Previous project. For details, see pages 1579 to 1581 of Annual Report for 1960. Existing project. A protective beach generally 200 feet wide and about 13,000 feet long between Camp Pendleton Harbor and Witherby Street and 100 feet wide and about 4,500 feet long south of Loma Alta Creek by deposition of about 2,200,000 cubic yards of suitable material, including 500,000 cubic yards as advance nourishment; and a groin about 800 feet long near northern limit of fill. In addition, a groin extension (not part of authorized project) was constructed at non-Federal expense. Federal first cost of new work on completed project was $1,650,295 (including $280,724 for beach nourishment). (See table 33-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Initiated and completed preparation of plans and specifications for beach nourishment to replenish existing project. Awarded contract. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of groin and its extension was completed in July 1961. Dredging was completed in April 1963. Plans and specifications for beach nourishment to replenish existing project were completed in August 1981. Contract was awarded in September 1981. 14. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS Inspection costs for fiscal year from regular funds for maintenance were $49,000 for San Gabriel River to Newport Bay (Surfside-Sunset and Newport Beach), Orange County, Calif. (part), in March and April 1981, and in August and September 1981. 33-6 LOS ANGELES, CALIF., DISTRICT 15. OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS See table 33-E. Flood Control 16. ALAMO LAKE, BILL WILLIAMS RIVER, ARIZ. Location. About 70 miles southeast of Kingman, Ariz., in a narrow gorge at river mile 39 on Bill Williams River, Ariz., a tributary of Colorado River. Existing project. A multiple-purpose dam and reservoir. Dam is a rolled-earthfill structure with a maximum height of 283 feet above streambed and a crest length of about 975 feet. Outlet works consist of a concrete-lined tunnel through the left abutment of dam; an approach channel; a bulkhead gate; a concrete intake structure with log racks at upstream tunnel portal; a control shaft and gate chamber just upstream from axis of dam; and an outlet channel that discharges into the river. The detached, broad-crested spillway with a crest length of 110 feet, which is on the right abutment, consists of an unlined channel 110 feet wide and 550 feet long excavated in rock and a concrete control sill at the crest. Reservoir has a total capacity at spillway crest of 1,046,310 acre-feet (May 1968), including 200,000 acre-feet for sediment. Reservoir regulates runoff from a tributary area of 4,770 square miles, reducing flow of design flood from 317,000 cubic feet per second to a maximum outflow of 7,000 cubic feet per second. First cost of new work for completed project was $16,934,060, all Federal, including $57,000 for Code 710 recreation project. (See table 33-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintained dam in good operating condition; completed acquisition of rights-of-way; and administered real estate. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of dam and appurtenances was initiated in March 1965 and was completed in July 1968. Fish and wildlife management plan was completed in January 1968. Work remaining consists of constructing recreational facilities and updating master plan. 17. ALLENVILLE, ARIZ. Location. On Gila River 1.5 miles south of Buckeye and 35 miles west of Phoenix, Maricopa County, Ariz. Existing project. Plan provides for relocating community outside flood plain to a 60-acre tract near intersection of Interstate 10 and Palo Verde Road, about 8 miles northwest of Buckeye, Ariz.; and constructing streets, utilities, community center, park, and replacement houses. Latest approved estimated (1980) first cost for project is $3,723,000 ($2,866,000 Federal and $857,000 non-Federal). (See table 33- B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; hold the United States free from damages due to construction works, except those damages due to fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; maintain and operate works after completion; contribute 20 percent of sharable costs and bear 100 percent of all first costs in excess of $3,562,000; maintain books, records, documents, and other evidence pertaining to costs and expenses incurred in project; sell or rent houses constructed by Government and convey title to any public facilities constructed by Government to appropriate public or quasi-public entity as approved by Government; sell houses constructed by Government at not less than fair market value within 5 years of date of completion of project or pay appropriate share of fair market value of houses to Government; submit appropriate accounting to Government by 15th of March of each year and pay 80 percent of gross proceeds of sales and rentals of houses constructed by Government, without interest, for preceeding calendar year, except that, if total first costs of project exceed $3,750,000, local interests shall deduct from amount payable all such proceeds up to amount of first costs in excess of $3,750,000; comply with requirements of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, Public Law 91- 646; and comply with the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Public Law 88-352. Operations and results during fiscal year. Awarded contract for and initiated construction of buildings and grounds at a cost of $2,265,636 regular funds and $159,196 required contributed funds. Administered rights-of-way acquisition initiated and completed by local interests. Condition at end of fiscal year. Contract for construction of buildings and grounds was awarded in January 1981 and is about 89 percent complete. 18. CUCAMONGA CREEK, SANTA ANA RIVER BASIN, CALIF. Location. In and near the Cities of Upland, Rancho Cucamonga, and Ontario, and the communities of Alta Loma and San Antonio Heights, San Bernardino and Riverside Counties, Calif. Existing project. Plan as modified provides for a debris basin on Cucamonga Creek and a concrete channel along Cucamonga Creek from the debris basin to Prado Dam; an improved San Antonio Heights diversion system that would include 6 debris basins and a concrete diversion channel to divert West Cucamonga Creek headwaters into Cucamonga Creek; a collection levee and a debris basin downstream from Demens, Thorpe, and Angalls Canyons and a concrete outlet channel from the debris basin to Cucamonga Creek; a debris basin in Deer Canyon and a channel along Deer Creek from the debris basin to Cucamonga Creek; the Hillside debris basin in a canyon just west of Deer Canyon with an outlet channel to Deer Creek channel; improvement of an existing levee system along the west bank of Day Creek to assure that flows from Day Canyon do not enter Deer Creek channel; turnouts to mitigate ground water basin recharge losses; landscaping appropriate for esthetic treatment; and recreational facilities in the project area. Subdrainage would be provided along specific reaches of the channels. Approved estimated (1981) first cost for modified project is $139,400,000 (includes allowance for estimated inflation through construction period), comprising $113,000,000 Federal and $26,400,000 non-Federal. Map of modified plan is in "Design Memorandum No. 2, General Design for Flood Control and Recreation, Cucamonga Creek, Santa Ana River Basin, San Bernardino and Riverside Counties, California," prepared by Los Angeles District in June 1973. (See table 33- B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way, including value of lands already acquired; perform alteration and modification of highways, roads, streets, highway bridges, utilities, and 33-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 irrigation and drainage facilities; deposit funds with the United States to cover cost of constructing outlets; hold the United States free from damages due to construction works and from damages arising from water-rights claims resulting from construction, operation, and maintenance of project; operate and maintain works after completion, including removal of debris (detritus) to maintain adequate storage capacities in debris basins; and prevent any encroachment that would reduce flood-carrying capacities of channels and levees or that would reduce debris-storage capacities of debris basins. Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued construction of sixth contract, Cucamonga Creek, Foothill Boulevard to Cucamonga Creek debris basin, north half of Ontario International Airport box conduit, and Demens channel and debris basin. Completed preparation of plans and specifications for seventh contract, San Antonio Heights diversion system; awarded contract; and initiated construction. Initiated and completed preparation of plans and specifications for eighth contract, Deer Creek channel, Cucamonga Creek channel to Haven Avenue; awarded contract; and initiated construction. Initiated preparation of plans and specifications for ninth contract, Deer and Hillside debris basins, north half of Deer Creek channel, Hillside channel, and Deer-Day separation levee. Continued preparation of plans and specifications for tenth contract, beautification of Cucamonga and Demens Creek channels. Administered rights-of-way acquisition continued by local interests. Continued preparation of operation and maintenance manual. Costs for construction of channels were $21,655,965 regular funds, and $1,531,552 other contributed funds; and costs for relocations were $230,579 regular funds and $23,751 other contributed funds. Condition at end of fiscal year. Final environmental statement was filed with Council on Environmental Quality in April 1975. Construction of first contract, Cucamonga Creek channel at Prado Dam, was initiated in June 1975 and was completed in November 1975; second contract, Cucamonga Creek, Hellman Avenue to Remington Avenue, was initiated in June 1976 and was completed in April 1977; third contract, Cucamonga Creek, Remington Avenue to Pomona Freeway, was initiated in August 1977 and was completed in June 1978; fourth contract, Cucamonga Creek, Pomona Freeway to south half of Ontario International Airport, was initiated in June 1978 and was completed in December 1979; and fifth contract, Cucamonga Creek, Ontario International Airport to Foothill Boulevard, and Cucamonga Creek debris basin, was initiated in June 1979 and was completed in August 1980. Sixth contract, Cucamonga Creek, Foothill Boulevard to Cucamonga Creek debris basin, north half of Ontario International Airport box conduit, and Demens channel and debris basin, was initiated in August 1980 and is about 99 percent complete. Plans and specifications for seventh contract, San Antonio Heights diversion system, were completed in March 1981; and contract for construction was awarded in May 1981. Seventh contract is about 80 percent complete. Plans and specifications for eighth contract, Deer Creek channel, Cucamonga Creek channel to Haven Avenue, were completed in June 1981; and contract for construction was awarded in July 1981. Eighth contract is about 33 percent complete. Plans and specifications for ninth contract, Deer and Hillside debris basins, north half of Deer Creek channel, Hillside channel, and Deer-Day separation levee, are about 80 percent complete. Plans and specifications for tenth contract, beautification of Cucamonga and Demens Creek channels, are about 99 percent complete. Operation and maintenance manual is about 98 percent complete. 19. GILA RIVER BASIN, ARIZ. 19A. INDIAN BEND WASH, ARIZ. Location. On Indian Bend Wash in Scottsdale and Tempe, Ariz. Existing project. Plan as modified provides for a greenbelt floodway with an unlined inlet channel, including an unlined interceptor channel, a siphon to carry Arizona Canal irrigation waters under Indian Bend Wash, and a wasteway structure to discharge floodwaters from the canal into the inlet channel; an unlined outlet channel to discharge floodwaters into the Salt River; a collector and side channels system to relieve ponding west of the Arizona Canal; beautification; and recreational facilities. Design flood of 30,000 cubic feet per second would be controlled by improvements. Approved estimated (1981) first cost for modified project is $41,900,000 (includes allowance for estimated inflation through construction period), comprising $31,400,000 Federal and $10,500,000 non-Federal. Map of modified plan is in "Design Memorandum No. 1, General Design Memorandum Phase II, Project Design for Indian Bend Wash, Arizona," prepared by Los Angeles District in May 1975. (See table 33-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way including spoil-disposal areas; accomplish modification or relocation of highways, roads, bridges, utilities, streets, and irrigation facilities (except siphon system for Arizona Canal); hold the United States free from damages due to construction works; maintain and operate works after completion; prevent any encroachment upon improved channel that would reduce its flood-carrying capacity; at least annually, notify interests affected that project will not provide complete flood protection; maintain a greenbelt floodway between inlet and outlet works (generally McDonald Drive to Van Buren Street); establish regulations for occupancy and use of floodway; provide adequate dikes, floodwalls, and floodproofing to existing structures to safely pass the 100-year flood of 30,000 cubic feet per second; bear all incremental costs of any changes in plan as authorized by 1965 Flood Control Act made solely for purpose of reducing amount of land required for flood easements; and comply with requirements of Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (Public Law 91-646). Local interests supplied assurances as required by section 221 of Public Law 91-611. Operations and results during fiscal year. Awarded contract for; initiated; and completed sixth contract, flood control features of interceptor channel. Completed preparation of plans and specifications for seventh contract, recreation and beautification features for interceptor channel; and awarded contract. Initiated preparation of plans and specifications for eighth contract, side channels system. Continued preparation of operation and maintenance manual. Costs for construction of channels were $2,204,531 regular funds and $20,275 other contributed funds; cost for construction of recreational facilities was $97,172 regular funds; and cost for relocations was $152,035 regular funds. Administered rights-of-way acquisition continued by local interests. Condition at end of fiscal year. Final environmental statement was filed with Council on Environmental Quality in August 1974. Construction of first contract, outlet channel and associated recreational facilities, was initiated in January 1976 and was completed in January 1978; second 33-8 LOS ANGELES, CALIF., DISTRICT contract, McDowell Plaza (formerly Hohokam Plaza), was initiated in May 1977 and was completed in January 1979; third contract, beautification of outlet channel, was initiated in June 1977 and was completed in November 1977; fourth contract, Indian School Park, a recreational feature in greenbelt floodway, was initiated in June 1978 and was completed in January 1980; fifth contract, inlet channel, including a siphon and wasteway structure for Arizona Canal and associated recreational facilities, was initiated in July 1978 and was completed in January 1980; and sixth contract, flood control features of interceptor channel, was initiated in November 1980 and was completed in April 1981. Plans and specifications for seventh contract, recreation and beautification features for interceptor channel, were completed in April 1981 and contract was awarded in September 1981. Plans and specifications for eighth contract, side channels system, were initiated in April 1981 and are about 40 percent complete. Preparation of operation and maintenance manual is about 48 percent complete. 19B. PAINTED ROCK DAM (GILA RIVER), ARIZ. Location. On Gila River (mile 126) about 20 miles downstream from Gila Bend, Ariz., in Gila River Basin, which is a part of Colorado River Basin. Existing project. A rolled-earthfill dam with maximum height of 181 feet above streambed, crest length of 4,780 feet, and detached broadcrested spillway with a crest length of 610 feet; and a flood control reservoir with a gross capacity at spillway crest of 2,491,700 acre-feet (Mar. 1953), including 200,000 acre-feet for sediment. Reservoir regulates runoff from a tributary area of 50,800 square miles, reducing flow of standard project flood of 300,000 cubic feet per second to a maximum outflow of 22,500 cubic feet per second. First cost of new work for completed project was $19,980,564, all Federal, including $357,469 for Code 710 recreation project. (See table 33-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must adjust waterrights claims that might result from improvement and keep flood channel of Gila River downstream from Painted Rock free from encroachment. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintained dam in good operating condition and administered real estate. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of dam and appurtenances was initiated in 1958 and was completed in December 1959. Construction of culvert was completed in August 1967. Construction of first contract for recreational facilities was initiated in August 1972 and was completed in December 1972; and second contract for construction of recreational facilities was initiated in November 1977 and was completed in April 1978. Work remaining consists of updating master plan; initiating preparation of reservoirregulation manual; and completing construction of recreational facilities. 19C. PHOENIX, ARIZ., AND VICINITY (INCLUDING NEW RIVER) Location. On Cave Creek, Skunk Creek, Dreamy Draw, New River, and Agua Fria River in and adjacent to metropolitan Phoenix, Ariz. Existing project. Plan as modified by Division Engineer, South Pacific Division, in July 1977, provides for four dams and detention basins, one each on Dreamy Draw, Cave Creek, Skunk Creek, and New River; Arizona Canal diversion channel; channel improvements on Cave Creek, Skunk Creek, and New River; flowage easements with some floodproofing along Skunk Creek and New and Agua Fria Rivers; flood plain management along Dreamy Draw, Cave Creek, Skunk Creek, and New River; and recreational facilities. Approved estimated (1981) first cost for modified project is $611,288,000 (full funding estimate and includes allowance for estimated inflation through construction period), comprising $343,298,000 Federal and $267,990,000 non-Federal. Map of modified plan is in "Design Memorandum No. 3, General Design Memorandum - Phase I, Plan Formulation for New River and Phoenix City Streams, Arizona," prepared by Los Angeles District in March 1976. (See table 33-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way, including spoil-disposal areas; perform construction, alteration, or relocation of highways, roads, highway bridges, utilities, irrigation and drainage works, and street modifications; hold the United States free from damages due to construction works; maintain and operate works after completion; prevent any encroachment upon existing or improved channels or within detention basin areas that would reduce their flood-carrying or storage capacities; hold the United States free from damages arising from water-rights claims resulting from construction, maintenance, and operation of project; contribute 2.3 percent of contruction cost; manage and maintain floodways and floodway fringes in affected watercourses and adjacent flood plains; at least annually, notify interests affected that project will not provide complete flood protection; acquire real estate interests downstream from spillways of project to assure project performance and to protect non-Federal interests from hazards of spillway flows; comply with requirements of Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (Public Law 91-646); and enter into an agreement with Arizona Game and Fish Department providing for operation and maintenance of mitigation lands. Local interests supplied assurances as required by section 221 of Public Law 91-611. Operations and results during fiscal year. Initiated construction of Adobe Dam at a cost of $7,945,086 regular funds; $202,521 required contributed funds; and $240,284 other contributed funds. Cost for bridge alterations was $21,643 regular funds. Continued preparation of plans and specifications for Skunk Creek channels and levees. Continued preparation of part 1A of project plan, phase II, Cave Creek floodway delineations. Continued preparation of part 5 of project plan, phase II, Arizona Canal diversion channel. Continued preparation of part 3 of project plan, phase II, New River Dam. Continued preparation of master plan for overall project, for Cave Buttes Dam, for New River Dam, and for Adobe Dam. Completed preparation of master plan for Dreamy Draw Dam. Administered rights-of-way acquisition continued by local interests. Continued preparation of operation and maintenance manual for Cave Buttes Dam. Condition at end of fiscal year. Final environmental statement for Dreamy Draw detention basin was filed with Council on Environmental Quality in May 1972. Construction of Dreamy Draw detention basin was initiated in October 1972 and was completed in August 1973. Final environmental statement for entire project was filed with Council on Environmental Quality in September 1976. Construction of Cave Buttes Dam was initiated in September 1977 and was completed in November 1979. Construction of Adobe Dam 33-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 was initiated in October 1980 and is about 91 percent complete. Plans and specifications for Skunk Creek channels and levees are about 99 percent complete. Part 1A of project plan, phase II, Cave Creek floodway delineations, is about 90 percent complete. Part 5 of project plan, phase II, Arizona Canal diversion channel, is about 25 percent complete. Part 3 of project plan, phase II, New River Dam, is about 80 percent complete. Master plan for overall project is about 90 percent complete; for Cave Buttes Dam, about 85 percent complete: for Adobe Dam, about 60 percent complete; and for New River Dam, about 25 percent complete. Operation and maintenance manual for Cave Buttes Dam is about 55 percent complete. 19D. TUCSON DIVERSION CHANNEL, ARIZ. Location. In Pima County in drainage areas of Tucson Arroyo and Julian Wash, tributaries of Santa Cruz River near Tucson, Ariz. Existing project. Protection for city of Tucson, Ariz., and suburban areas by diverting runoff from upstream part of Tucson Arroyo drainage area to an adjacent drainage area and thence to Santa Cruz River. After project was autho rized, local interests developed a plan of improvement differing substantially from project-document plan and constructed a major part of improvement under their plan. Subsequeritly, local interests requested a modification of project-document plan to provide more-flood control than would be available under plan developed by local interests. General provisions of modified plan, which replaced document plan, were approved by Chief of Engineers on September 2, 1958. Modified plan provided for increasing capacity of diversion-channel project under construction by Pima County to accommodate standard project flood discharge; and conveying floodflow to Santa Cruz River by means of an improved channel along Julian Wash. Work under modified plan involved completing diversion channel between Tucson Arroyo and Southern Pacific railroad and enlarging that channel at Tucson Arroyo; enlarging existing diversion channel between Southern Pacific railroad and detention basin; completing excavation of detention basin and increasing discharge capacity; increasing capacity of diversion channel between detention basin and Julian Wash; constructing an improved channel along Julian Wash; reconstructing or modifying eight highway bridges and two railroad bridges; and constructing five new highway bridges. First cost of new work for completed project as modified was $6,483,568, comprising $6,089,204 Federal (including $324,579 for Code 710 recreation project) and $394,364 non- Federal, including $1,008,000 spent for that part of completed improvements under plan developed by local interests used under modified plan. Map of modified plan is in "Design Memorandum No. 1, General Design for Tucson Diversion Channel, Tucson, Arizona," prepared by Los Angeles District in November 1962. (See table 33-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued preparation of master plan. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was completed in April 1966. Work remaining consists of completing preparation of master plan, which is about 90 percent complete, and construction of recreational facilities. 19E. WHITLOW RANCH DAM, QUEEN CREEK, ARIZ. Location. On Queen Creek, Ariz., a tributary of Gila River, about 10 miles west of Superior, Ariz. Existing project. A flood control dam and reservoir. Dam is a compacted-earthfill zoned structure with a maximum height of 149 feet above streambed and a crest length of 837 feet. Outlet works, which are at left abutment, consist of an intake structure; an ungated outlet conduit; and an outletand- diversion structure. The spillway, an unlined structure about 4,000 feet north of dam, consists of a broad-crested weir about 355 feet long; an approach channel 1,080 feet long; and a downstream channel about 1,300 feet long. Reservoir has a total capacity at spillway crest of 35,590 acre-feet (June 1975), of which 7,000 acre-feet are allocated for sediment. Reservoir regulates runoff from a tributary area of 143 square miles, reducing flow of design flood from 110,000 to 1,000 cubic feet per second. First cost of new work for completed project was $1,867,963, all Federal, including $3,758 for Code 710 recreation project. (See table 33-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintained dam in good operating condition; continued acquisition of rights-of-way; and administered real estate. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was started in May 1959 and was completed in November 1960.' Work remaining consists of updating master plan and completing acquisition of rights-of-way. 20. GOLETA, CALIF., AND VICINITY Location. Goleta Valley, along Atascadero Creek and its tributaries, including Tecolotito, Carneros, San Pedro, Las Vegas, San Jose, and Maria Ygnacio Creeks, from the Santa Ynez Mountains in Santa Barbara County to Pacific Ocean near Goleta, Calif. Existing project. Plan provides for about 12.5 miles of channel improvement, comprising about 1.3 miles of channel clearing and about 11.2 miles of channel construction. Channel clearing would be required on Maria Ygnacio, San Jose, Las Vegas, San Pedro, and Carneros Creeks. Channel construction would include the improvement of Atascadero Creek from San Marcos Road to ocean; Maria Ygnacio Creek from Hollister Avenue to Atascadero Creek; San Jose Creek from 0.2 mile north of U.S. Highway No. 101 to San Pedro Creek; Las Vegas Creek from Cathedral Oaks Road to San Pedro Creek; San Pedro Creek from a point 0.1 mile downstream from Stow Canyon Road to Atascadero Creek; Carneros Creek from 0.6 mile upstream from U.S. Highway No. 101, by means of a diversion route, to Tecolotito Creek; and Tecolotito Creek from U.S. Highway No. 101 to Atascadero Creek. Plan also provides for beautification and recreation features. Approved estimated (1981) first cost for project is $54,180,000 ($41,600,000 Federal and $12,580,000 non-Federal). (See table 33-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Provide lands, easements, and rightsof- way; perform necessary construction, modification, or relocation of highways (including bridges), utilities, and irrigation and drainage facilities; if topography of existing Tecolotito Creek within boundaries of City of Santa Barbara is altered by City of Santa Barbara, its officers, agents, employees, lessees, or purchasers, or any other person or 33-10 LOS ANGELES, CALIF., DISTRICT entity, and as a result thereof construction costs of proposed flood control channel in said creek are increased, pay for all said increased flood control construction costs; maintain and operate works after completion; hold and save the United States free from damages; adjust water-rights claims resulting from project; prevent any obstruction or encroachment that would reduce flood-carrying capacities of improved channels or natural channels upstream from works; and contribute 14.7 percent of construction costs for channel improvements on Atascadero and Maria Ygnacio Creeks upstream from mouth of San Pedro Creek, presentl3 estimated to be $540,000 apportioned share to be borne due tx land enhancement benefits. Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued preparation of project plan, phase I. Condition at end of fiscal year. Finalized draft of environmental statement was filed with Council on Environmental Quality in November 1970. Project plan, phase I, is about 35 percent complete. 21. LOS ANGELES COUNTY DRAINAGE AREA, CALIF. Location. Along Los Angeles and San Gabriel Rivers, Rio Hondo, and Ballona Creek, and tributaries thereof in Los Angeles County, Calif. Previous project. For details, see pages 1768 to 1772 of Annual Report for 1941; page 1602 of Annual Report for 1942; and page 1535 of Annual Report for 1943. Existing project. Plan provides for flood control improvements in four stream basins in Los Angeles County, Calif., as follows: Los Angeles River Basin, San Gabriel River Basin, Rio Hondo Basin, and Ballona Creek Basin. Provides for protection of about 325,000 acres in densely populated Los Angeles County, including areas in Los Angeles, Pasadena, Glendale, Burbank, and other cities. Plan provides for construction of 5 flood control dams (Hansen, Lopez, Santa Fe, Sepulveda, and Whittier Narrows); debris basins at mouths of 22 canyons; channel improvements along 101.3 miles of Los Angeles River, San Gabriel River, Rio Hondo, and Ballona Creek; and channel improvements along 193.69 miles of tributary channels. All units of improvement are physically completed in those four stream basins, except the one listed below, and are described in Annual Report for 1962. Unit of improvement not physically completed in Rio Hondo Basin is Sierra Madre Wash. Plan provides for the construction of about 0.8 mile of concrete channel on Sierra Madre Wash extending from inlet to existing Santa Anita Wash channel. (See table 33-B for authorizing legislation and table 33-F for latest approved estimated (1976) first costs for all units of improvement under existing project.) Local cooperation. Local interests must furnish lands and rights-of-way; bear expense of highway and highway-bridge modifications; hold the United States free from damages; and maintain and operate works after completion for following units or parts of units: Los Angeles River Basin: Blanchard Canyon Blue Gum Canyon Burbank-Eastern system Burbank-Western system (lower and upper) Caballero Creek Compton Creek: Hooper Avenue storm drain to Main Street Los Angeles River to Alameda Street Dead Horse Canyon and Royal Boulevard channel Haines Canyon: Plainview Avenue to Tujunga Wash Lopez Canyon diversion Los Angeles River channel: Owensmouth Avenue to Lankershim Boulevard Stewart and Gray Road to Santa Ana Branch, Pacific Electric railway bridge Santa Ana Branch, Pacific Electric railway bridge to Pacific Ocean Pacoima Wash channel Sycamore Wash channel Tujunga Wash channel Verdugo Wash: Concord Street to debris basin Wilson Canyon and Mansfield Street channel Winery Canyon San Gabriel River Basin: Coyote Creek Emerald Wash and Live Oak Wash Marshall Creek San Gabriel River channel: Santa Fe Dam to Whittier Narrows Dam Whittier Narrows Dam to the Pacific Ocean Thompson Creek and San Jose Wash (including San Jose Creek) Walnut Creek inlet channel Walnut Creek system Rio Hondo Basin: Alhambra Wash channel: Valley Boulevard to Rio Hondo Arcadia Wash system Eaton Wash Rio Hondo channel: Peck Road to Rosemead Boulevard (upper) Whittier Narrows Dam to Los Angeles River (lower) Rubio Canyon diversion Santa Anita Wash Sawpit Wash Sierra Madre Villa channel Sierra Madre Wash Ballona Creek Basin: Ballona Creek channel downstream from inlet to Washington Boulevard and downstream from La Salle Avenue to the lagoon Benedict Canyon system Centinela Creek Sawtelle-Westwood system (including Sepulveda channel). No local cooperation is required for other units or parts of units in existing project. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operations for units in Los Angeles River Basin: (a) Compton Creek: Maintained channel in good operating condition from Alameda Street to Hooper Avenue storm drain. (b) Haines Canyon: Maintained debris basin and channel upstream from 33-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 Plainview Avenue in good operating condition and administered real estate. (c) Hansen Dam: Maintained dam in good operating condition and administered real estate. Initiated construction of second contract for recreational facilities at a cost of $49,500 regular funds and $49,500 required contributed funds. (d) Lopez Dam: Maintained dam in good operating condition and administered real estate. (e) Los Angeles River channel, Lankershim Boulevard to Stewart and Gray Road: Maintained channel in good operating condition and administered real estate. (f) Los Angeles River channel, Santa Ana Branch, Pacific Electric railway bridge to Pacific Ocean: Completed phase 2 construction of recreational facilities at a cost of $501,222 regular funds and $473,987 required contributed funds. (g) Sepulveda Dam: Initiated preparation of master plan. Completed contract payment for third contract for recreational facilities at a cost of $38,850 regular funds and $36,150 required contributed funds. Continued preparation of plans and specifications for fourth contract for recreational facilities. Maintained dam in good operating condition and administered real estate. Operations for units in San Gabriel River Basin: (a) Santa Fe Dam: Maintained dam in good operating condition and administered real estate. Initiated and completed construction of phase 3 recreational facilities at access road. Completed preparation of plans and specifications for phase 4 construction of recreational facilities. Awarded contract for and initiated segment 1, phase 4, construction of recreational facilities. Awarded contract for and initiated segment 2, phase 4, construction of recreational facilities. Costs for construction of recreational facilities were $868,221 regular funds and $9,321 required contributed funds. (b) San Gabriel River channel, San Gabriel Canyon to Santa Fe Dam, Approach channel to Santa Fe Dam (remedial work): Maintained channel in good operating condition. (c) Whittier Narrows Dam: Maintained dam in good operating condition and administered real estate. Operations for units in Rio Hondo Basin: (a) Alhambra Wash: Maintained channel upstream from Valley Boulevard in good operating condition. (b) Rio Hondo channel, Whittier Narrows Dam to Los Angeles River (lower): Completed phase 2 construction of recreational facilities at a cost of $501,222 regular funds and $473,987 required contributed funds. Operations for unit in Ballona Creek Basin: Ballona Creek channel and jetties: Maintained channel downstream from Washington Boulevard to La Salle Avenue and downstream from Los Angeles city boundary to ocean; jetties; and Pacific Avenue bridge in good operating condition. Completed construction of first contract for recreational facilities at a cost of $16,058 regular funds and $96,718 required contributed funds. Condition at end of fiscal year. Revision of basic operation and maintenance manual for channel and debrisbasin units in Los Angeles County drainage area project and inserts are complete. Los Angeles River Basin: (a) Hansen Dam: Dam was completed in April 1940. Construction of first contract for recreational facilities was completed in June 1976. Work remaining consists of initiating preparation of reservoirregulation manual; completing construction of second contract for recreational facilities, which is about 95 percent complete; and initiating and completing construction of remaining recreational facilities. (b) Lopez Dam: Dam was completed in November 1954. Work remaining consists of initiating preparation of reservoir-regulation manual; and completing preparation of master plan, which is about 50 percent complete. (c) Los Angeles River channel, Lankershim Boulevard to Stewart and Gray Road: Work remaining consists of constructing recreational facilities. (d) Los Angeles River channel, Santa Ana Branch, Pacific Electric railway bridge to Pacific Ocean: Construction of contract for phase 1 recreational facilities was completed in April 1977; and for phase 2 recreational facilities, in June 1981. Work remaining consists of initiating and completing construction of remaining recreational facilities. (e) Sepulveda Dam: Dam was completed in December 1941. Construction of first contract for recreational facilities was completed in October 1974; second contract, in October 1978; and third contract, in May 1980. Work remaining consists of initiating preparation of reservoir-regulation manual; completing preparation of master plan, which is about 90 percent complete; completing preparation of plans and specifications for fourth contract for recreational facilities; and initiating and completing construction of remaining recreational facilities. (f) Tujunga Wash channel: Channel was completed in February 1952. Construction of phase 1 recreational facilities was completed in June 1976. Work remaining consists of completing construction of recreational facilities. San Gabriel River Basin: (a) Santa Fe Dam: Dam was completed in January 1949. Construction of phase 1 recreational facilities was completed in January 1978; phase 2 recreational facilities, in May 1979; phase 3 recreational facilities, in June 1980; and phase 3 recreational facilities at access road, in April 1981. Work remaining consists of initiating preparation of reservoir-regulation manual; completing construction of segment 1, phase 4, recreational facilities, which is about 27 percent complete; completing construction of segment 2, phase 4, recreational facilities, which is about 7 percent complete; and initiating and completing construction of remaining recreational facilities. (b) Whittier Narrows Dam: Dam was completed in June 1957. Construction of first contract for recreational facilities, area A, phase 1, was completed in March 1975; second contract, nature area, in July 1975; third contract, area A, phase 2, in March 1976; fourth contract, area E, in June 1976; fifth contract, Entrada Park and Equestrian campground, in May 1977; sixth contract, area B, in May 1977; seventh contract, model hobby area, in March 1977; eighth contract, Charro Arena, in July 1978; ninth contract, Visitor Center, in September 1978; tenth contract, area B, phase 1A, in August 1978; eleventh contract, General Improvements, phase I, in December 1979; twelfth contract, Visitor Center Displays, in December 1979; and thirteenth contract, Bicentennial Park Improvements, in June 1980. Work remaining consists of completing revision of operation and maintenance manual, which is about 40 percent complete; initiating preparation of reservoir-regulation manual; initiating and completing preparation of plans and specifications for fourteenth contract for recreational facilities, area B group camping; initiating and completing construction of fourteenth contract; and initiating and completing construction of remaining recreational facilities. Rio Hondo Basin: (a) Rio Hondo channel, Whittier Narrows Dam to Los Angeles River (lower): Construction of contract for phase 1 recreational facilities was completed in April 1977; and for phase 2 recreational facilities, in June 1981. Work remaining consists of initiating and completing construction of remaining recreational facilities. (b) Sierra Madre Wash: In accordance with 1st Indorsement, DAENCWP- W, Office, Chief of Engineers, November 23, 1976, subject: Reclassification of Project, Los Angeles County Drainage Area, Sierra Madre Wash, Calif., to basic letter, November 15, 1976, work on this unit is inactive. 33-12 LOS ANGELES, CALIF., DISTRICT Ballona Creek Basin: Construction of first contract for recreational facilities was completed in December 1980. Work remaining consists of initiating and completing construction of second contract for recreational facilities; and initiating and completing construction of remaining recreational facilities. 22. LYTLE AND WARM CREEKS, SANTA ANA RIVER BASIN, CALIF. Location. Near San Bernardino and Colton, San Bernardino County, Calif. Existing project. Plan as modified provides for a rectangular concrete channel extending for 3.5 miles along East Branch of Lytle Creek from existing Foothill Boulevard inlet structure to confluence with Warm Creek; a concrete trapezoidal channel on Warm Creek for 1.5 miles from confluence with East Branch of Lytle Creek to confluence with Santa Ana River; a leveed channel extending about 1.8 miles along Santa Ana River from mouth of existing East Twin and Warm Creeks concrete channel to Mount Vernon Avenue crossing; replacement of 4 railroad bridges and 12 highway bridges; 3 new highway bridges; inlets for side drainage; and relocation and protection of utilities. Design capacities of improvements would be: East Branch of Lytle Creek, 58,000 cubic feet per second; Warm Creek, 60,000 to 90,000 cubic feet per second; and Santa Ana River, 167,000 to 234,000 cubic feet per second. Latest approved estimated (1980) first cost of modified project is $42,300,000 ($35,500,000 Federal and $6,800,000 non-Federal). Authorized project was modified by Design Memorandum No. 1, approved in May 1972, which contains a map of modified project plan. (See table 33-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; perform construction, modification, or relocation of highways and utilities; maintain and operate works after completion; hold the United States free from damages; adjust water-rights claims resulting from project; and prevent any encroachment that would reduce flood-carrying capacities of levee and channel improvements. Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued preparation of supplemental project plan. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of first contract, Lytle and Warm Creeks channel, "I" Street to Interstate 15 at Warm Creek, was initiated in September 1972 and was completed in April 1974; second contract, Lytle Creek channel, 5th Street to "I" Street, was initiated in December 1972 and was completed in July 1974; third contract, Warm Creek channel, Interstate 15 to Interstate 10, was initiated in July 1973 and was completed in May 1974; fourth contract, Warm Creek and Santa Ana River, railroad bridge relocations, was initiated in March 1974 and was completed in June 1975; fifth contract, Lytle Creek from inlet to 5th Street and Santa Ana River from Interstate 15 to Mt. Vernon Avenue, was initiated in May 1975 and was completed in January 1976; sixth contract, Santa Ana River, East Twin and Warm Creeks to Interstate 15, was initiated in June 1976 and was completed in June 1977; and seventh contract, Santa Ana River, East Twin and Warm Creeks to Mt. Vernon Avenue, was initiated in August 1979 and was completed in December 1979. Final environmental statement was filed with Council on Environmental Quality in May 1972. Work remaining consists of completing preparation of supplemental project plan, which is about 95 percent complete. 23. MOJAVE RIVER DAM, MOJAVE RIVER BASIN, CALIF. Location. On Mojave River at the Forks site, just downstream from mouth of Deep Creek and about 14 miles upstream from Victorville, in Mojave River Basin, Calif. Existing project. A flood control dam and reservoir. Dam is a rolled-earthfill structure with a maximum height of 200 feet above streambed, a crest length of 2,200 feet, and a detached spillway with a crest length of 200 feet. Reservoir has a total capacity at spillway crest of 89,670 acre-feet (1965), including 11,000 acre-feet for sediment. Reservoir regulates runoff from a tributary area of 215 square miles, reducing flow of design flood from 94,000 cubic feet per second to a maximum outflow of about 23,500 cubic feet per second. Approved estimated (1981) first cost of modified for project is $18,190,000 ($17,900,000 Federal and $290,000 non- Federal). Modification of project was authorized by the Chief of Engineers on November 27, 1964. (See table 33-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must hold the United States free from damages from water-rights claims resulting from construction and operation of project; prevent encroachment harmful to existing channel downstream from reservoir; and maintain channel capacity of not less than 23,500 cubic feet per second through improved areas. In addition, local interests have agreed to operate and maintain recreational facilities constructed by the United States and to construct, operate, and maintain such future recreational facilities as may be required in addition to those constructed by the United States. Local interests contributed $250,000 in consideration of land enhancement benefits provided by modified project. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintained dam in good operating condition and administered real estate. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of dam and appurtenances was initiated in May 1968 and was completed in May 1971. Construction of recreational facilities was initiated in July 1972 and was completed in March 1973. Construction of relocations, roads, and permanent operating equipment was initiated in August 1974 and was completed in November 1974. In accordance with 2d Indorsement, ENGCW-OC, Office, Chief of Engineers, April 13, 1971, subject: Environmental Statement, Mojave River Forks Recreation Area Project, to basic letter, January 15, 1971, the environmental statement for recreation is not required. 24. PINE AND MATHEWS CANYONS DAMS, COLORADO RIVER BASIN, NEV. Location. In Lincoln County, Nev., about 100 miles north of Hoover Dam and about 17 and 20 miles, respectively, east of Caliente, Nev. Existing project. Reservoirs are interdependent units of a project for protection of lands and improvements against floods, each unit consisting of a dam and a reservoir. Operation of Pine Canyon Reservoir regulates runoff from a tributary area of 45 square miles, reducing standard project flood from 10,500 to 320 cubic feet per second. Operation of Mathews Canyon Reservoir regulates runoff from a tributary area of 34 square miles, reducing standard project flood from 8,500 to 260 cubic feet per second. First cost of new work for 33-13 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 completed project was $1,401,248, all Federal. For further project description, see page 1355 of Annual Report for 1967. (See table 33-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintained dams in good operating condition and administered real estate. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of reservoirs was completed in December 1957. 25. SAN LUIS REY RIVER, SAN LUIS REY RIVER BASIN, CALIF. Location. Lower San Luis Rey River Valley, along San Luis Rey River from Murray Road (river mile 7.2) to Pacific Ocean, San Diego County, Calif. Existing project. Plan provides for about 5.7 miles of earth-bottom trapezoidal channel along San Luis Rey River from Murray Road to about 1 mile upstream from U. S. Highway No. 101; about 1.5 miles of channel grading, which would generally be limited to the removal of spoil banks, from about 1 mile upstream from U. S. Highway No. 101 to ocean; and about 800 feet of stone-revetted levee on the left (south) bank from the Atcheson, Topeka and Santa Fe railroad to ocean. Plan also provides for beautification features. Approved estimated (1981) first cost for project is $34,400,000 ($26,200,000 Federal and $8,200,000 non- Federal). (See table 33-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Provide lands, easements, and rightsof- way; perform necessary construction, "modification, or relocation of highways (including bridges), utilities, and irrigation and drainage facilities; maintain and operate works after completion; hold and save the United States free from damages; adjust water-rights claims resulting from project; prevent any obstruction or encroachment that would reduce flood-carrying capacities of improved channel; provide guidance and leadership in preventing unwise future development of flood plain; and contribute 10 percent of construction costs for levee and channel improvements, presently estimated to be $2,300,000 apportioned share to be borne due to land enhancement benefits. Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued preparation of project plan, phase I. Initiated preparation of project plan, phase II. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project plan, phase I, is about 98 percent complete. Project plan, phase II, is about 2 percent complete. 26. SANTA ANA RIVER BASIN (AND ORANGE COUNTY), CALIF. Location. On Santa Ana River and tributaries and on other streams in Orange, Riverside, and San Bernardino Counties, Calif. General plan of improvement. Although a single comprehensive plan for flood control has been developed for Santa Ana River Basin, improvements provided are divided into two projects in accordance with congressional authorizations. Santa Ana River Basin (and Orange County) project, the first of these two projects, provides for protection of metropolitan area of Orange County, which includes some areas outside Santa Ana River Basin, and flood control on San Antonio, Chino, Lytle, and Cajon Creeks. Santa Ana River Basin project, the second of these two projects, provides for flood control in other areas of basin. Active units of first project are described in Annual Report for 1968. For pertinent information on second project, see table 33-I, "Other Authorized Flood Control Projects." Existing project. (See table 33-B for authorizing legislation and table 33-G for latest approved estimated Federal first cost for all units.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operations for units in existing project: (a) Brea Dam: Maintained dam in good operating condition and administered real estate. (b) Carbon Canyon Dam and channel: Maintained project in good operating condition; administered real estate; and continued acquisition of rights-of-way. (c) Fullerton Dam: Maintained dam in good operating condition and administered real estate. Awarded contract for; initiated; and completed construction of third contract (phase 4) for recreational facilities at a cost of $58,679 regular funds and $58,339 required contributed funds. (d) Prado Dam: Maintained dam in good operating condition and administered real estate. Awarded contract for; initiated; and completed construction of third contract for recreational facilities at a cost of $43,225 regular funds and $45,722 required contributed funds. Completed preparation of plans and specifications for construction of fourth contract for recreational facilities. (e) San Antonio Dam: Maintained dam in good operating condition and administered real estate. (f) San Antonio and Chino Creeks channel: Maintained project in good operating condition and administered real estate. Condition at end of fiscal year. Work remaining consists of completing basic operation and maintenance manual, which is about 98 percent complete, and completing inserts for channel and levee improvements (Lytle and Cajon Creeks channel improvements and San Antonio and Chino Creeks channel). Other information for units in existing project; (a) Brea Dam: Dam was completed in March 1942. Work remaining consists of updating master plan; initiating reservoir-regulation manual; and initiating and constructing recreational facilities. (b) Carbon Canyon Dam and channel: Project was completed in May 1961. Construction of first contract (phase 1) for recreational facilities was completed in July 1975; second contract (phase 2) for recreational facilities, in October 1978; and third contract (phase 2) for recreational facilities, in June 1980. Work remaining consists of completing acquisition of rights-of-way; and initiating and completing construction of remaining recreational facilities. (c) Fullerton Dam: Dam was completed in May 1941. Construction of first contract (phase 2) for recreational facilities was completed in June 1976; second contract (phase 3), in January 1978; and third contract (phase 4), in July 1981. Work remaining consists of initiating reservoir-regulation manual; and initiating and completing construction of remaining recreational facilities. (d) Lytle and Cajon Creek channel improvements: Existing project was completed in 1948 and turned over to local interests for maintenance in September 1949. Work remaining consists of completing operation and maintenance manual, which is about 98 percent complete. (e) Prado Dam: Dam was completed in May 1941. Construction of first contract for recreational facilities was completed in January 1979; second contract for recreational facilities, in August 1979; and third contract for recreational facilities, in July 1981. Work remaining consists of initiating reservoir-regulation manual; initiating and completing construction of fourth contract for recreational facilities; and initiating and completing construction of remaining recreational facilities. (f) San Antonio Dam: Dam 33-14 LOS ANGELES, CALIF., DISTRICT was completed in October 1956. Work remaining consists of preparation of master plan. (g) San Antonio and Chino Creeks channel: Project was completed in November 1960. Work remaining consists of completing operation and maintenance manual, which is about 98 percent complete. 27. SANTA MARIA VALLEY LEVEES, SANTA MARIA RIVER BASIN, CALIF. Location. Along Santa Maria River and Bradley Canyon in Santa Barbara and San Luis Obispo Counties, Calif., about 60 miles northwest of City of Santa Barbara. Improvements along Santa Maria River extend about 21.9 miles from Fugler Point (at junction of Cuyama and Sisquoc Rivers) to Pacific Ocean. Improvements along Bradley Canyon extend from Canyon mouth to Santa Maria River. Existing project. Levee and channel improvements along Santa Maria River and along Bradley Canyon. Principal features include: about 17 miles of revetted levee along left bank of Santa Maria River from Fugler Point to State Highway 1 bridge at Guadalupe; about 5 miles of revetted levee along right bank of Santa Maria River from about 1.3 miles downstream from U.S. Highway 101 to about 1.5 miles upstream from Southern Pacific railroad bridge; about 1.8 miles of channel and revetted levee from mouth of Bradley Canyon to Santa Maria River, about 21.9 miles of cleared channel along Santa Maria River from Fugler Point to Pacific Ocean; and raised Southern Pacific railroad bridge. Latest approved estimated (1980) first cost is $13,710,000 (includes allowance for estimated inflation through construction period), comprising $12,600,000 Federal and $1,110,000 non-Federal. (See table 33-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Completed preparation of plans and specifications. Awarded contract for and initiated construction to correct project deficiencies at a cost of $1,350,290 regular funds. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was initiated in June 1959 and was completed in June 1963. Plans and specifications were completed in March 1981. Contract for construction to correct project deficiencies was awarded in June 1981; initiated in July 1981; and is about 36 percent complete. 28. SANTA PAULA CREEK CHANNEL AND DEBRIS BASINS (INCLUDING MUD CREEK), SANTA CLARA RIVER BASIN, CALIF. Location. Along lower Santa Paula Creek, a tributary of Santa Clara River, Ventura County, Calif. Existing project. Plan as modified provides for a debris basin on Santa Paula Creek; a concrete channel along Santa Paula Creek from Santa Paula Creek debris basin to Santa Clara River; a debris basin on Mud Creek, a tributary of Santa Paula Creek; and a concrete channel along Mud Creek from Mud Creek debris basin to confluence with Santa Paula Creek. Approved estimated (1981) first cost of modified project is $41,600,000 (includes allowance for estimated inflation through construction period), comprising $38,200,000 Federal and $3,400,000 non-Federal. Authorized project was modified by Design Memorandum No. 4, approved in April 1973, which contains a map of modified project plan. (See table 33-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must furnish rights-ofway; assume responsibility for damage claims; provide cost of relocation of public utilities; and maintain improvement after completion. Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued preparation of supplemental project plan. Continued preparation of supplemental environmental statement. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of first contract, Harvard Boulevard to Santa Clara River, was initiated in August 1973 and was completed in February 1974. Construction of second contract, Mupu School to Harvard Boulevard, was terminated in February 1975. Final environmental statement was filed with Council on Environmental Quality in September 1972. Supplemental project plan is about 50 percent complete. Supplemental environmental statement is about 50 percent complete. 29. SESPE CREEK AT FILLMORE, VENTURA COUNTY, CALIF. Location. In and near the City of Fillmore, Ventura County, Calif. Existing project. Plan provides for a 2-mile long rockrevetted single levee on the east bank of Sespe Creek; 25 rock groins to divert flows away from levee toe; floodgates in levee at Southern Pacific Railroad crossing; a new east span for Old Telegraph Road bridge; reinforcement of both spans of railroad bridge; and floodproofing 2 homes on west bank. Latest approved estimated (1980) first cost for project is $5,600,000 ($3,000,000 Federal and $2,600,000 non-Federal). (See table 33-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way, including borrow area and placement of dredged material; provide a cash contribution for first costs in excess of Federal limitation; perform alterations and relocations of buildings, transportation facilities, storm drains, utilities, and other structures and improvements (excluding railroad bridges and approaches, and facilities for normal interception and disposal of local interior drainage at line of protection); maintain and operate works after completion; hold the United States free from water rights claims; prescribe and enforce regulations to prevent obstruction or encroachment on flood control works that would reduce their flood-carrying capacity or hinder maintenance and operation, and control development in project area to prevent an undue increase in flood damage potential; publicize flood plain information and provide this information to zoning and other regulatory agencies; hold the United States free from damages due to construction, operation, and maintenance of project, excluding damages due to fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; comply with requirements of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Estate Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (Public Law 91-646); and comply with section 221 of Public Law 91-611. Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued preparation of plans and specifications. Condition at end of fiscal year. Plans and specifications are about 80 percent complete. 33-15 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 30. SWEETWATER RIVER, SWEETWATER RIVER BASIN, CALIF. Location. Lower Sweetwater River Valley, along Sweetwater River from Bonita Mesa Road to San Diego Bay, San Diego County, Calif. Existing project. Plan provides for about 3.4 miles of improved trapezoidal channel along Sweetwater River from Bonita Mesa Road to San Diego Bay as part of a combined flood control and highway project. Approved estimated (1981) first cost for project is $38,400,000 ($20,200,000 Federal and $18,200,000 non-Federal). (See table 33-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; perform construction, modification, or relocation of highways (including bridges), utilities, and irrigation and drainage facilities; maintain and operate works after completion; hold the United States free from damages due to construction of project; adjust waterrights claims resulting from construction of project; and prevent any obstruction or encroachment that would reduce the flood-carrying capacity of improved channel. Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued preparation of project plan. Continued preparation of final environmental statement. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project plan is about 98 percent complete. Final environmental statement is about 98 percent complete. 31. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspection costs for fiscal year from regular funds for maintenance were $306,722. (See table 33-H on inspection of completed flood control projects.) 32. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS In accordance with section 7, Flood Control Act of 1944, studies of reservoir operations for flood control were conducted; and preparation of regulations for the use of storage allocated for flood control was continued for the following Bureau of Reclamation projects: Hoover Dam and Twitchell Dam. Costs for fiscal year from regular funds for maintenance were $50,497. 33. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See table 33-I. 34. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to section 205, Public Law 80-858, as amended (preauthorization) See table 33-J on flood control work under special authorization. Emergency bank protection (sec. 14 of 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Cong.) Federal costs for fiscal year were $55 for Broadway bridge, Pantano Wash, Tucson, Ariz.; and $14,107 for Pismo Beach, Calif., seawall. Emergency flood control activities - repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation) Federal cost for fiscal year was $11,533,999, of which $135,713 were for advance preparation; $4,575,177 were for flood emergency operations; and $6,823,109 were for rehabilitation. Flood insurance activities (sections 1301-1377, 1968 Housing and Urban Development Act, Public Law 90- 448, as amended) In coordination with flood control activities, flood insurance studies were continued in accordance with Intet- Agency Agreements at fiscal year cost of $39,902 under Housing and Urban Development reimbursable order. 35. SURVEYS Fiscal year cost was $3,899,183 regular funds, of which $415,203 were for navigation studies; $7,860 were for beach erosion control studies; $3,003,441 were for flood control studies; $14,203 were for special studies involving coordination with other agencies; $152,768 were for review of authorized projects; and $305,708 were for supplemental preauthorization studies, phase I. 36. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Fiscal year costs were $226,967 for technical services, including $10,174 for Luke Air Force Base, $4 for Southeast, and -$1,495 for Salt and Gila Rivers, all in Maricopa County, Ariz.; $23,622 for Vandenberg Air Force Base, Santa Barbara County, Calif.; $171 for Point Mugu, Ventura County, Calif.; $88,657 for flood plain management; and $283,189 for inspection of dams. 37. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT Fiscal year cost was $17,652 for hydrologic studies. 33-16 TABLE 33-A LOS ANGELES, CALIF., DISTRICT COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 Sept. 30, 1981 1. Channel Islands Harbor, Calif. 2. Los Angeles and Long Beach Harbors, Calif. (Regular Funds) (Required Contrib. Funds) (Other Contrib. Funds) 3. Marina del Rey, Los Angeles County, Calif. (Regular Funds (Required Contrib. Funds) 4. Newport Bay Harbor, Calif. (Regular Funds) (Other Contrib. Funds) 5. Oceanside Harbor, Calif. (Regular Funds) Other Contrib. FUnds) 6. Redondo Beach Harbor (King Harbor), Calif. 7. San Diego River and Mission Bay, Calif. 8. Santa Barbara Harbor, Calif. New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. "Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Maint.: Contrib. Cost few Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Maint.: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost Maint.: Contrib. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Maint.: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost $2;043,000 2,005,364 335,000 270,112 240,000 239,849 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 416,000 438,735 1,000 492 125,000 97,718 21,000 20,998 696,000 553,906 $58 62! 44' 48 10: 101 3,421 $1 9,844 1 5,000 1 3,356 3,500 1 0,118 - 2 3,000 3,000 38,000 37,903 11,000 20,332 316 235,000 238,522 573,000 572,770 116,000 256,539 - - $5,123,3451 - - 5,123,3451 [,755,800 135,000 13,225,9292 ,749,607 120,000 13,202,9862 .,897,000 9,525,000 46,828,7193 613,231 9,208,416 45,201,8343 ,032,592 80,322 4,393,4594 984,783 131,664 4,393,4594 - 599,000 599,000 - 365,188 365,188 ,500,000 18,688,000 22,860,5756 125,353 15,661,607 17,459,5357 - - 87,1206 - - 87,1206 - - 4,238,752 - - 4,238,7527 5,000 988,169 1,338,0998 5,000 966,830 1,316,7608 - - 4,238,752 - - 4,238,752 - 120,840 120,840 - 114,000 114,000 - - 796,8979 - - 796,8979 - 342,000 590,02610 72 315,459 563,46010 7,700 7,700 7,000 7,000 - 1,063,000 4,261,065" - 998,795 4,195,35811 - - 491,28612 - - 491,28612 - 1,200,000 1,200,000 - 1,160,000 1,160,000 - - 4,766,89813 - - 4,766,89813 1,000 75,000 638,11914 1,036 46,524 609,48714 270,000 250,000 11,585,09915 228,165 222,763 11,444,26915 7,308 7,701 1,247,47316 7,540 7,701 1,247,47316 - - 172,00017 - - 172,000 670,000 819,088 6,118,40718 669,003 820,922 6,117,68918 33-17 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 33-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Project Ventura Marina (Ventura Harbor), Calif. 12. Imperial Beach, Calif. (Regular Funds) (Required Contrib. Funds) 13. Oceanside, San Diego County, Calif. 16. Alamo Lake, Bill Williams River, Ariz. 17. Allenville, Ariz. (Regular Funds) (Required Contrib. Funds) 18. Cucamonga Creek, Santa Ana River Basin, Calif. Regular Funds) Required Contrib. unds) Other Contrib. Funds) 19A. Gila River Basin, Ariz., Indian Bend Wash Regular Funds) equired Contrib. unds) (Other Contrib. Funds) 19B. Gila River Basin, Ariz., Painted Rock Dam (Gila River) 19C. Gila River Basin, Ariz., Phoenix, Ariz., and vicinity including New River) Regular Funds) Required Contrib. unds) (Other Contrib. Funds) 19D. Gila River Basin, Ariz., Tucson diversion channel 9. 44 42 Funding New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 23,732 1,278,400 425,909 188,191 283,000 250,851 7,962,000 6,198,109 82,842 72,681 115,000 40,013 21 20 17 19 10,36 10,56 - - 1,711,53919 - - 1,711,53919 8,800 1,119,489 8,105,33720 3,228 1,124,735 8,082,35020 - 246,900 877,75721 - 58,135 686,07421 - - 25,601 - - 25,584 - 1,000,000 2,369,57122 - 280,724 1,650,29522 - - 16,934,06023 - 51 16,934,06023 2,000 272,000 2,477,799 )8,931 266,153 2,458,880 '9,857 2,780,000 2,999,857 5,298 2,335,961 2,544,165 - 200,000 200,000 - 159,196 159,196 10,000 23,754,000 70,340,900 18,282 23,239,439 69,410,158 3,574,144 1,747,264 1,133,000 1,199,929 - 58,711 - 43,632 38,802 31,450 695,378 194,893 1,800 - 8,319 - 752,000 784,208 6,269,000 8,235,861 1,827,000 1,803,377 5,023,000 5,064,307 1,264,509 1,596,452 3,243,000 3,198,191 20,275 208 325,500 309,586 11,400,000 11,008,053 85,512 72,264 8,935,668 7,203,720 22,081,480 21,837,014 354,211 279,160 2,336,260 2,246,411 19,980,56424 19,980,56424 5,124,148 5,082,101 39,017,297 38,039,014 2,214 359,000 - 741,214 146,578 178,751 202,521 624,673 - 296,000 - 421,000 6,604 -906 240,960 319,339 -30,000 83,000 80,000 6,097,62525 26 48,277 66,448 106,851 6,089,20425 27 33-18 736,000 1,200,000 735,968 1,197,803 100,000 - 91,817 14,942 -_- -_- Total Cost to FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 Sept. 30, 1981 1,025,000 - 1,022,849 8,665 276,500 248,300 277,120 245,607 - 40,000 - 12,906 -- 10,340,000 13,660,000 10,448,670 14,090,894 64,712 - 72,264 - 1,563,415 1,284,900 1,690,072 1,199,826 5,378,500 5,877,600 3,059,178 8,203,954 TABLE 33-A (Cont'd) LOS ANGELES, CALIF., DISTRICT COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 Sept. 30, 1981 19E. Gila River Basin, Ariz., Whitlow Ranch Dam, Queen Creek 20. Goleta, Calif., and vicinity 21. Los Angeles County drainage area, Calif. (Regular Funds) (Required Contrib. Funds) Other Contrib. Funds) 22. Lytle and Warm Crer' , Santa Ana Ri" er Basin, Ctl if. (Regular Funds) (Other Contrib. Funds) 23. Mojave River Dam, Mojave River Basin, Calif. (Regular Funds) (Other Contrib. Funds) 24. Pine and Mathews Canyons Dams, Colorado River Basin, Nev. 25. San Luis Rey River, San Luis Rey River Basin, Calif. 26. Santa Ana River Basin (and Orange County), Calif. (Regular Funds) (Required Contrib. Funds) 27. Santa Maria Valley levees, Santa Maria River Basin, Calif. 28. Santa Paula Creek channel and debris basins (including Mud Creek), Santa Clara River Basin, Calif. (Regular Funds) (Other Contrib. unds) New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost - 1,867,963" - 1,867,9632 100,000 20,000 52,000 99,716 20,033 48,685 - - 100,000 - - 97,271 2,693,000 2,920,000 3,568,000 2,622,085 2,664,856 4,528,809 33,000 36,566 400,000 377,275 2,697,000 1,990,086 431,413 431,413 500,000 474,546 375,267,98529 30 374,248,02629 31 1,996,500 2,055,600 3,837,700 3,234,600 32,681,02029 2,135,268 2,116,442 3,808,269 2,773,217 32,138,11329 3,169,591 554,665 2,747,300 616,467 13,519,02332 2,961,182 491,091 2,755,063 760,513 12,796,311 3 - - - - 36,644,8653a - - - - 36,639,8883a - 2,700,000 36,000 60,000 35,045,831 141,797 1,760,555 1,154,340 71,834 35,042,530 - -20,802 186,124 306 - -115,000 29,665 21,333 75,000 70,000 74,758 45,569 -_- -_- 42,000 42,000 230,000 251,898 525,000 1,888,986 1,098,900 1,205,985 540,000 447,391 272,000 180,542 47,000 244,379 2,272 5,002 8,544 207,000 235,064 35,000 51,000 34,620 48,620 290,000 200,000 280,413 210,973 60,000 46,000 626,278 -2,114 903,000 2,172,500 893,883 1,965,343 278,800 29,000 245,600 262,595 117,400 150,000 208,853 106,269 - 49,000 8,045 17,016 - 5,452,510 - 5,436,616 - 17,838,198 9,927 17,837,954 241,000 985,548 240,158 984,419 - 286,300 - 284,501 - 1,401,248 - 1,401,248 28,000 30,760 300,000 235,956 92,000 154,058 1,606,000 1,744,626 45,000 118,891 1,600,000 1,475,037 250,000 213,732 - 11,400 -- 509,356 509,356 1,364,000 1,296,810 47,151,63835 36 37 47,122,98135 36 38 15,297,11035 39 15,203.28335 39 3,253,15640 3,147.11741 7,675,13442 7,506,43542 4,281,00041 4,212,5344; 205,000 47,266 33-19 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 33-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Project Funding FY 78 29. Sespe Creek at New Work: Fillmore, Ventura Approp. 60,000 County, Calif. Cost 56,284 30. Sweetwater River, New Work: Sweetwater River Approp. - Basin, Calif. Cost 100,627 1. Excludes $1,361,668 Navy funds; Coast Guard costs; and $210,748 other contributed funds.. 2. Includes $7,178 for reconnaissance and condition surveys. Excludes $3,089,203 for maintenance accomplished with Navy funds. 3. Includes $2,187,047 for new work for previous project; $1,593,667 public works funds; a credit of $33,050 for transfer of land at Reservation Point; and $996,792 emergency relief funds. Excludes Federal funds spent by the Navy for new work on middle breakwater, and Coast Guard costs. 4. Includes $139,347 for maintenance for previous project and $121,523 for reconnaissance and condition survey costs since FY 1958. 5. Includes $1,672,575 for new work betterments desired by local interests prior to 1976 modification. 6. Includes $87,120 for maintenance betterments desired by local interests prior to 1976 modification. 7. Excludes $1,843,146 other contributed funds and Coast Guard costs. 8. Includes $70,044 for reconnaissance and condition surveys. 9. Public Works Administration funds. Excludes $796,897 required contributed funds and $1,100 preauthorization costs. 10. Includes $86,783 for reconnaissance and conditiorn survey costs since FY 1958. 11. Includes $24,330 for reconnaissance and conditior surveys. Excludes $3,942,673 for maintenance accomplishec with Navy funds. 12. For jetty and groin extensions desired by loca interests. 13. Excludes Coast Guard costs. 14. Includes $20,517 for reconnaissance and condition survey costs since FY 1958. 15. Excludes $557,832 other contributed funds. Includes $2,610,000 regular funds and excludes $2,910,000 required contributed funds, both for new work on flood control project, "San Diego River Basin, Calif." 16. Includes $81,941 for reconnaissance and condition surveys. 17. Excludes Coast Guard costs. 18. Includes $29,198 public works funds; $11,000 working funds for work performed in addition to existing project; and $9,275 for reconnaissance and condition surveys. Excludes $462,986 other contributed funds spent by the Corps for maintenance-dredging betterments desired by local interests. 19. Excludes $1,708,836 required contributed funds and Coast Guard costs. 20. Includes $53,899 for reconnaissance and condition surveys. 21. Excludes $66,124 other contributed funds and Coast Guard costs. 22. Excludes $604,817 other contributed funds. 23. Includes $57,000 Code 710 funds since FY 1975. 24. Includes $357,469 Code 710 funds since FY 1962. 25. Excludes $394,364 other contributed funds. 26. Includes 333,000 Code 710 funds since FY 1977. 27. Includes $324,579 Code 710 funds since FY 1977. 28. Includes $3,758 Code 710 funds since FY 1962. 29. Includes 11,008,935 emergency relief funds for new work. Excludes 16,726,888 emergency relief funds spent by Corps in connection with emergency relief (previous) project and $107,939 for minor rehabilitation. 30. Includes $22,005,000 Code 710 funds since FY 1974 ($1,320,500 for Sepulveda Dam; $6,290,000 for Whittier Total Cost to FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 Sept. 30, 1981 165,000 25,000 40,000 154,239 24,229 46,769 290,000 281,521 - 100,000 15,100 1,429,503 17,603 40,948 72,395 1,425,898 Narrows Dam; $22,000 for LACDA prototype; $566,000 for Hansen Dam; $8,665,000 for Santa Fe Dam; $215,000 for Tujunga Wash channel; $8,500 for Lopez Dam; $3,610,000 for Los Angeles River and Rio Hondo channels; and $1,308,000 for Ballona Creek channel). 31. Includes $20,985,040 Code 710 funds since FY 1974 ($1,209,613 for Sepulveda Dam; $6,285,744 for Whittier Narrows Dam; $22,000 for LACDA prototype; $547,580 for Hansen Dam; $8,257,398 for Santa Fe Dam; $215,000 for Tujunga Wash channel; $8,500 for Lopez Dam; $3,523,909 for Los Angeles River and Rio Hondo channels; and $915,296 for' Ballona Creek channel). 32. Includes $13,519,023 Code 710 funds since FY 1974 ($992,650 for Sepulveda Dam; $6,527,817 for Whittier Narrows Dam; $200,000 for Tujunga Wash channel; $460,500 for Hansen Dam; $2,824,056 for Los Angeles River and Rio Hondo channels; $1,469,000 for Santa Fe Dam; and $1,045,000 for Ballona Creek channel). 33. Includes $12,796,311 Code 710 funds since FY 1974 ($991,600 for Sepulveda Dam; $6,510,694 for Whittier Narrows Dam; $199,542 for Tujunga Wash channel; $441,333 for Hansen Dam; $2,675,436 for Los Angeles River and Rio Hondo channels; $1,388,953 for Santa Fe Dam; and $588,753 for Ballona Creek channel). 34. Non-Federal funds spent by the Federal Government to September 30, 1981, for replacements required as part of local cooperation and betterments desired by local interests. Excludes $4,238,000 other contributed funds spent by the Corps in connection with emergency relief (previous) project. 35. Comprises funds for Brea, Fullerton, Prado, and San Antonio Dams, Carbon Canyon Dam and channel, Lytle and Cajon Creeks channel improvements, and San Antonio and Chino Creeks channel (active units). 36. Includes $5,000 working funds for San Antonio Dam; $67,361 for San Juan Dam inactive unit) (also reported under "Other Authorized Flood Control Projects"); and $85,310 undistributed funds. Excludes other contributed funds spent by the Corps as follows: $124,105 for water conservation betterments desired by local interests at Prado Dam; X8,500 for betterments desired by local interests at San Antonio Dam; $234,709 for betterments desired by local interests on San Antonio and Chino Creeks channel; and $601,762 for required items of local cooperation on Lytle and Cajon Creeks channel improvements. Excludes $290,000 spent direct by local interests on San Antonio and Chino Creeks channel for local cooperation items not required. 37. Includes $5,077,731 Code 710 funds since FY 1974 ($1,058,731 for Carbon Canyon Dam and channel; $1,273,000 for Fullerton Dam; and $2,746,000 for Prado Dam). 38. Includes $5,049,074 Code 710 funds since FY 1974 ($1,058,731 for Carbon Canyon Dam and channel; $1,265,559 for Fullerton Dam; and $2,724,784 for Prado Dam). 39. Excludes maintenance for Lytle and Cajon Creeks channel improvements, which are operated and maintained by local interests. 40. Includes $3,253,156 Code 710 funds since FY 1974 ($1,424,926 for Carbon Canyon Dam and channel; $1,334,230 for Fullerton Dam; and $494,000 for Prado Dam). 41. Includes $3,147,417 Code 710 funds since FY 1975 ($1,370,485 for Carbon Canyon Dam and channel; $1,311,292 for Fullerton Dam; and $465,640 for Prado Dam). 42. Excludes $106,364 other contributed funds. 43. Excludes non-Federal costs of $295,000 for local cooperation items not required. 33-20 TABLE 33-B LOS ANGELES, CALIF., DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Sept. 3, 1954 June 3, 1896 June 25, 1910 July 25, 1912 Aug. 8, 1917 Sept. 22, 1922 Mar. 3, 1925 July 3, 1930 Do. Aug. 30, 1935 Oct. 17, 1940 Sept. 3, 1954 July 14, 1960 CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR, CALIF. (See Section 1 of Text) Harbor for light-draft vessels and shore protection works. LOS ANGELES AND LONG BEACH HARBORS, CALIF. (See Section 2 of Text) A breakwater 8,500 feet long, east of Point Fermin. Extend said breakwater to shore, making a total length of 11,152 feet from Point Fermin. Dredge Los Angeles outer harbor west of entrance channel. For silt-diversion works. Triangular area approach to Los Angeles inner harbor entrance channel. Dredge Los Angeles Harbor main channel and entrance 35 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide; dredge inner harbor turning basin 35 feet deep; and reclamation of Reservation Point. A detached breakwater 12,500 feet long in prolongation of existing breakwater (authorized by act of 1896). Widen fairway on east side of entrance to Los Angeles inner harbor; dredge a channel 35 feet deep and 650 feet wide in East Basin from turning basin to U.S. station 406; dredge 35 feet deep and 400 feet wide in Cerritos channel from U.S. station 406 to Long Beach turning basin; a turning basin 35 feet deep at Long Beach; entrance channel to Long Beach Harbor 35 feet deep and 500 feet wide; and maintenance of the Long Beach breakwater south of outer end pier A. This act provides that in no case shall dredging be done within 50 feet of established pierhead lines of existing piers and wharves. Dredge 1,000-foot-wide entrance channel to Los Angeles outer harbor to 40-foot depth and a turning basin 3,500 feet long and 1,500 feet wide to same depth; and enlarge entrance to inner harbor by dredging to 35-foot depth a triangular area at its junction with turning basin. Dredge to a depth of 40 feet areas A and B adjacent to 40-foot-depth entrance channel; construct and maintain a rubblemound breakwater of composite type 21,000 feet long in eastward direction from northeast end of existing detached breakwater; dredge about 4 million cubic yards initially for a settling basin at mouth of Los Angeles River diversion channel and deposit material on beaches eastward therefrom to Belmont pier; maintenance dredging of areas A and B, and at mouth of Los Angeles River diversion channel; all subject to such modifications as in discretion of the Chief of Engineers may be advisable to meet requirements of the Navy. Dredge to a depth of 35 feet in East Basin as a modification of existing project. This act provides that the Secretary of the Army is authorized to reimburse local interests for work they have done upon this project prior to July 1, 1953, at actual cost to local interests so far as same shall be approved by Chief of Engineers and found to have been done in accordance with the project hereby adopted and that such reimbursement shall be subject to appropriations applicable thereto or funds available therefor and shall not take precedence over other pending projects of higher priority or harbor improvements; and that such payments shall not exceed $500,000. Dredge to a depth of 35 feet in West Basin as a modification of existing project. 33-21 H. Doc. 362, 83d Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 18, 55th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 969, 60th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 8, 62d Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 9, 64th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 1013, 66th Cong., 3d sess. H. Doc. 349, 68th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 33, 71st Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 130, 71st Cong., 2d sess. S. Committee print, 74th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 843, 76th Cong., 3d sess. H. Doc. 161, 83d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 401, 86th Cong., 2d sess. REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 33-B (Cont'd) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Oct. 22, 1976 Sept. 3, 1954 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Oct. 27, 1965 May 17, 1950 July 24, 1946 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 Oct. 23, 1962 Dec. 31, 1970 Aug. 13, 1968 July 3, 1958 Dredge Los Angeles Harbor entrance channel 45 feet deep, 1,000 feet wide, and about 5,500 feet long; Los Angeles channel 45 feet deep, 750 feet wide, and about 12,500 feet long; inner harbor turning basin 45 feet deep, 1,350 feet wide, and about 1,650 feet long; East Basin channel 45 feet deep, 400 feet wide, and about 6,000 feet long; West Basin 45 feet deep, from 350 to 1,350 feet wide, and about 3,800 feet long; and East Basin 45 feet deep, from 400 to 950 feet wide, and about 2,000 feet long. This act provides that no dredging shall be done within 125 feet of established pierhead lines, wharves, or other structures MARINA DEL REY, LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIF. (See Section 3 of Text) Harbor for light-draft vessels. NEWPORT BAY HARBOR, CALIF. (See Section 4 of Text) Maintenance of work authorized by Public Works Administration. Widening the main channel to a general width of 350 feet and a width of 700 feet just inside the entrance; deepening Newport channel to 15 feet over a width varying up to 330 feet; and dredging two anchorage areas to a depth of 20 feet. OCEANSIDE HARBOR, CALIF. (See Section 5 of Text) Maintenance of general navigation features of Del Mar Boat Basin and of Oceanside Harbor. REDONDO BEACH HARBOR (KING HARBOR), CALIF. (See Section 6 of Text) Reconstruction of part of original breakwater and construction of extension; construction of south breakwater; and maintenance of breakwaters. SAN DIEGO RIVER AND MISSION BAY, CALIF. (See Section 7 of Text) Modification of existing flood control project for San Diego River, Calif., to include a multiple-purpose project for flood control on San Diego River and small-boat navigation on Mission Bay. SANTA BARBARA HARBOR, CALIF. (See Section 8 of Text) Maintenance dredging present depths into harbor formed by breakwater constructed by local interests. Permits maintenance by means of a fixed sand-intercepting plant to be provided and operated by and at expense of local interests. United States to contribute to operating expense an amount not to exceed $30,000 annually, whenever funds are allotted therefor; funds thus contributed to be reduced by actual cost of harbor maintenance if and when intercepting plant has been installed. Modification of existing project. Dredging and maintenance by United States. VENTURA MARINA (VENTURA HARBOR), CALIF. (See Section 9 of Text) Adoption and maintenance of existing general navigation features of harbor, excluding interior basins; construction of an offshore breakwater; dredging a sand trap in lee of breakwater; repairing existing north and middle jetties; and construction of recreational fishing facilities on jetty crests. IMPERIAL BEACH, CALIF. (See Section 12 of Text) Federal participation by contribution of Federal funds toward cost of five groins. H. Doc 94-594, 94th Cong., 2d sess.' H. Doc. 389, 83d Cong., 2d sess. S. Committee Print, 75th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 138, 78th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 76, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 303, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 760, 79th Cong., 2d sess.' S. Committee Print, 73d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 348, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 518, 87th Cong., 2d sess.' None H. Doc. 356, 90th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 399, 84th Cong., 2d sess. 33-22 TABLE 33-B (Cont'd) LOS ANGELES, CALIF., DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Mar. 29, 1961 Oct. 20, 1980 Dec. 22, 1944 July 15, 19802 Aug. 13, 1968 Oct. 27, 1965 Mar. 7, 1974 May 17, 1950 Oct. 27, 1965 June 30, 1948 July 24, 1946 Dec. 31, 1970 June 22, 1936 May 15, 1937 June 28, 1938 Aug. 18, 1941 Dec. 22, 1944 Work Authorized OCEANSIDE, SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIF. (See Section 13 of Text) Protective beach and stone groin. Beach nourishment. ALAMO LAKE, BILL WILLIAMS RIVER, ARIZ. (See Section 16 of Text) Multiple-purpose dam and reservoir. ALLENVILLE, ARIZ. (See Section 17 of Text) Relocate community, streets, utilities, community center, and park; and replace houses. CUCAMONGA CREEK, SANTA ANA RIVER BASIN, CALIF. (See Section 18 of Text) Debris-collection facilities, with a system of channels, and a diversion system. INDIAN BEND WASH, GILA RIVER BASIN, ARIZ. (See Section 19A of Text) Channel, levees, a siphon system, and transition works. Cost of siphon system borne by United States. PAINTED ROCK DAM (GILA RIVER), GILA RIVER BASIN, ARIZ. (See Section 19B of Text) Dam and flood control basin. PHOENIX ARIZ., AND VICINITY (INCLUDING NEW RIVER), GILA RIVER BASIN (See Section 19C of Text) Detention basins, diversion channels, and channel improvements. TUCSON DIVERSION CHANNEL, GILA RIVER BASIN, ARIZ. (See Section 19D of Text) Channel improvements. WHITLOW RANCH DAM, QUEEN CREEK, GILA RIVER BASIN, ARIZ. (See Section 19E of Text) Dam and flood control basin. GOLETA, CALIF., AND VICINITY (See Section 20 of Text) Channel improvement, and beautification and recreational features. LOS ANGELES COUNTY DRAINAGE AREA, CALIF. (See Section 21 of Text) Reservoirs and flood channels for flood control and related purposes at an estimated construction cost not to exceed 70 million. Added flood channels on Ballona Creek and tributaries to project. Provision of lands, easements, and rights-of-way and relocations by Federal Government instead of by local interests. (Resultant additional cost to the United States, $12,541,000.) Project extended to include additional flood control reservoirs, flood control channels, and debris basins for flood control and related purposes. Also authorized to be appropriated $25 million for further accomplishment of plan. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $25 million for prosecution of comprehensive plan approved in Flood Control Act of Aug. 18, 1941. Documents H. Doc. 456, 86th Cong., 2d sess. None H. Doc. 625, 78th Cong., 2d sess. None H. Doc. 323, 90th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 303, 88th Cong., 2d sess. None H. Doc. 331, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 216, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 274, 80th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 220, 80th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 91-392, 91st Cong., 2 sess. None None None H. Doc. 838, 76th Cong., 3d sess. None 33-23 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 33-B (Cont'd) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Authorized to be appropriated an additional $25 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan. Rio Hondo channel improvement, Whittier Narrows Reservoir to Los Angeles River (in lieu of enlarging channel and bridges on San Gabriel River downstream from reservoir). Also authorized to be appropriated an additional $40 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $12,500,000 for further prosecution of comprehensive plan. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $44 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $32 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $3,700,000 for further prosecution of comprehensive plan. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $30 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan. In addition to all previous authorizations, completion of improvements under the comprehensive plan for flood control in the Los Angeles River Basin at a presently estimated cost of $31 million for completion. Oct. 27, 1965 July 14, 1960 May 17, 1950 Dec. 17, 1970 :' June 22, 1936 June 28, 1938 Aug. 18, 1941 Dec. 22, 1944 July 3, 1958 LYTLE AND WARM CREEKS, SANTA ANA RIVER BASIN, CALIF. (See Section 22 of Text) Channels and levees. MOJAVE RIVER DAM, MOJAVE RIVER BASIN, CALIF. (See Section 23 of Text) Dam and reservoir, and an earthfill dike. PINE AND MATHEWS CANYONS DAMS, COLORADO RIVER BASIN, NEV. (See Section 24 of Text) Dams and flood control basins. SAN LUIS REY RIVER, SAN LUIS REY RIVER BASIN, CALIF. (See Section 25 of Text) Channel and levee; and beautification features. SANTA ANA RIVER BASIN (AND ORANGE COUNTY), CALIF. (See Section 26 of Text) Reservoirs and flood channels for flood control and related purposes for protection of metropolitan area of Orange County, at an estimated construction cost not to exceed $13 million. San Antonio and Chino Creeks channel portion of improvement. Authorized to be appropriated $6,500,000 for initiation and partial accomplishment of plans for those creeks. Rescinded provisions of Flood Control Act of 1936, providing that local interests pay for relocations, lands, easements, and rights-of-way. (Estimated resultant additional cost to United States, $3,500,000.) Authorized to be appropriated an additional $2,500,000 for prosecution of projects approved in above flood control acts. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $10 million for prosecution of projects adopted in above-mentioned flood control acts, including projects on Lytle and Cajon Creeks for local flood protection at San Bernardino and Colton, Calif. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $8 million for prosecution of projects approved in abovementioned flood control acts. S. Doc. 53, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 164, 86th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 530, 81st Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 91-106, 91st Cong., 2d sess. None H. Doc. 688, 75th Cong., 3d sess. None H. Doc. 534, 78th Cong., 2d sess.' None 33-24 July 24, 1946 May 17, 1950 Sept. 3, 1954 July 3, 1958 July 14, 1960 Oct. 23. 1962 Dec. 30, 1963 June 18, 1965 None None None None None None None None TABLE 33-B (Cont'd) LOS ANGELES, CALIF., DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents SANTA MARIA VALLEY LEVEES SANTA MARIA RIVER BASIN, CALIF. (See Section 27 of text) Sept. 3, 1954 Levee and channel improvements. H. Doc. 400, 83d Cong., 2d sess. SANTA PAULA CREEK CHANNEL AND DEBRIS BASINS (INCLUDING MUD CREEK), SANTA CLARA RIVER BASIN, CALIF. (See Section 28 of Text) June 30, 1948 Channel improvement. H. Doc 443, 80th Cong., 1st sess. SESPE CREEK AT FILLMORE, VENTURA COUNTY, CALIF. (See Section 29 of Text) Aug. 11, 19802 Levee, rock groins, floodgates, bridge span, and None floodproofed homes. SWEETWATER RIVER, SWEETWATER RIVER BASIN, CALIF. (See Section 30 of Text) Aug. 13, 1968 Channel improvement, as part of a combined flood H. Doc. 148, 90th Cong., control and highway project. 1st sess. 1. Contains latest published map. 3. Final date of approval by House and Senate Public 2. Date approved by Chief of Engineers under provi- Works Committees resolution under provisions of section sions of section 205, Public Law 80-858, as amended. 201, Public Law 89-298. TABLE 33-C RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS (See Section 10 of Text) Name of Project Date Survey Conducted San Diego Harbor, Calif. June 1981 33-25 TABLE 33-D REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Section 11 of Text) For Last Cost to Sept. 30, 1981 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Dana Point Harbor, Calif. 1972 $4,737,550' $17,4002 Morro Bay Harbor, Calif. 1980 2,612,0933 4,932,6344 Port Hueneme, Calif. 1976 1,012,5525 17,2256 Port San Luis, Calif. 1977 1,137,7597 69,5898 San Diego Harbor, Calif. 1980 28,091,7769 1,506,43610 1. Excludes $4,777,000 required contributed funds and 9. Includes $154,704 for new work for previous projects; Coast Guard costs $86,352 public works funds; and $1,226,793 emergency relief 2. Includes $17,400 for reconnaissance and condition funds. Excludes $254,795 Navy funds for dredging entrance surveys. channel in FY 1961 to depth of -42 feet mean lower low 3. Navy funds. Excludes $2,128,411 for rehabilitation, water (or 2 feet below project depth); $715,215 required 4. Includes $238,092 for reconnaissance and condition contributed funds; $1,900,063 other contributed funds, surveys since FY 1958 and $307,945 Navy funds. Excludes including $4,441 for betterments desired by $124,578 local interests other contributed funds. Includes $39,583 expended prior to modification by 1968 River and Harbor Act; and in FY 1981. Coast Guard costs. Includes $191 expended in FY 1981. 5. Excludes $57,609 other contributed funds. Includes 10. Includes $59,904 for maintenance for previous $24,970 expended in FY 1981. projects and $118,899 for reconnaissance and condition 6. Includes $17,225 for reconnaissance and condition surveys since FY 1958. In addition, includes $144 for surveys. retroactive pay increase, as reported in 1958 Annual Report, 7. Includes $568,417 for new work prior to modification page 1430. by 1965 River and Harbor Act. Excludes Coast Guard costs. 8. Includes $54,715 for maintenance for project prior to modification by 1965 River and Harbor Act and $14,874 for reconnaissance and condition surveys. TABLE 33-E OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 15 of Text) For Last Cost to Sept. 30, 1981 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Anaheim Bay Harbor,Orange County, Calif.' 1967 $89,119 - Bird Rock area, La Jolla, San Diego County, Calif.2 1967 25,8813 Coast of California, Point Mugu to San Pedro breakwater, Calif. 1972 1,253,5944 - Doheny Beach State Park (Doheny State Beach), Calif. 1968 578,7175 - Las Tunas Beach, San Diego County, Calif. 1976 107,484 - Ocean Beach, San Diego County, Calif.6 1960 7,912 - San Diego (Sunset Cliffs), Calif. 1979 365,0007 - San Gabriel River to Newport Bay (Surfside-Sunset and Newport Beach), Orange County, Calif. 1979 6,170,1738 - Ventura-Pierpont area, Calif. 1969 715,8199 - 1. The project authorized by the Act of Congress of October 23, 1962, H. Doc. 602, 87th Cong., 2d sess., in lieu of part of the original Anaheim Bay Harbor project is covered under San Gabriel River to Newport Bay (Surfside-Sunset and Newport Beach), Orange County, Calif. 2. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of section 103, Public Law 87-874. 3. Excludes $75,614 required contributed funds. 4. Excludes $1,238,418 required contributed funds. 5. Excludes $431,260 required contributed funds. 6. Plant in service. 7. Excludes $180,438 required contributed funds. Includes $15 expended in FY 1981. 8. Excludes $2,892,914 required contributed funds. Includes -$31,826 expended in FY 1981. 9. Excludes $117,406 other contributed funds for beachnourishment betterments and $618,949 required contributed funds. 33-26 LOS ANGELES, CALIF., DISTRICT TABLE 33-F LOS ANGELES COUNTY DRAINAGE AREA, CALIF.: LATEST APPROVED ESTIMATED FIRST COSTS FOR ALL UNITS OF IMPROVEMENT UNDER EXISTING PROJECT (See Section 21 of Text) Latest Approved Estimated Cost 1976' Project Units Federal Local2 Total UNITS IN $70 MILLION PROJECT Los Angeles River Basin: Compton Creek, Los Angeles River to Hooper Ave. storm drain Haines Canyon Hansen Dam Los Angeles River channel: Lankershim Blvd. to Steward and Gray Rd. Los Angeles River channel, Long Beach Blvd. Sepulveda Dam Sycamore Wash Verdugo Wash, Concord St. to upper Canada bridge San Gabriel River Basin: San Gabriel River channel: San Gabriel Canyon to Santa Fe Dam Approach channel to Santa Fe Dam (remedial work) Santa Fe Dam to Walnut Creek Santa Fe Dam Rio Hondo Basin: Alhambra Wash Ballona Creek Basin: Ballona Creek channel and jetties Subtotal UNITS OUTSIDE $70 MILLION PROJECT Los Angeles River Basin: Blanchard Canyon Blue Gum Canyon Burbank-Eastern system Burbank-Western system (lower) Burbank-Western system (upper) Caballero Creek Compton Creek: Los Angeles River to Hooper Ave. storm drain Hooper Ave. storm drain to Main St. Dead Horse Canyon and Royal Blvd. channel Lopez Canyon diversion Lopez Dam Los Angeles River channel: Owensmouth Ave. to Lankershim Blvd. Lankershim Blvd. to Stewart and Gray Rd. Steward and Gray Rd. to Santa Ana Branch, Pacific Electric railway bridge Santa Ana Branch, Pacific Electric railway bridge to Pacific Ocean Pacoima Wash channel Tujunga Wash channel Verdugo Wash, upper Canada bridge to debris basin Wilson Canyon and Mansfield St. channel Winery Canyon San Gabriel River Basin: Coyote Creek (including North Fork) Emerald Wash and Live Oak Wash Marshall Creek San Gabriel River channel: Santa Fe Dam to Whittier Narrows Dam Whittier Narrows Dam to Pacific Ocean Thompson Creek and San Jose Wash (including San Jose Creek) Walnut Creek inlet channel Walnut Creek system Whittier Narrows Dam Rio Hondo Basin: Arcadia Wash system Eaton Wash Rio Hondo channel: Peck Rd. to Rosemead Blvd. (upper) Whittier Narrows Dam to Los Angeles River (lower) Rubio Canyon diversion Santa Anita Wash Sawpit Wash $2,510,500 524,000 11,343,000 40,807,300 34,200 6,657,000 24,000 1,087,000 810,800 951,900 32,300 12,647,000 1,109,000 1,280,000 79,818,000 682,000 533,000 7,149,000 1,279,000 4,930,000 1,484,200 149,000 1,052,000 664,000 743,500 729,000 8,135,800 9,202,100 5,860,900 32,612,000 3,178,100 7,322,900 635,000 3,917,500 413,000 18,802,300 1,658,600 2,577,900 5,748,800 20,887,200 21,274,600 2,879,000 17,232,600 32,254,000 5,236,800 4,225,100 4,412,000 8,165,000 1,066,400 3,045,700 2,348,600 - $2,510,500 - 524,000 - 11,343,000 - 40,807,300 - 34,200 - 6,657,000 - 24,000 - 1,087,000 - 810,800 - 951,900 - 32,300 - 12,647,000 - 1,109,000 - 1,280,000 - 79,818,000 $476,000 233,000 1,850,000 268,000 2,959,000 493,000 457,000 316,000 665,000 4,247,000 81,000 9,173,000 1,306,000 2,557,000 363,000 857,000 265,000 8,426,000 1,182,000 968,000 1,797,000 3,108,000 6,095,000 1,091,000 8,715,000 38,000 1,893,000 1,194,000 550,000 2,565,000 254,000 434,000 745,000 1,158,000 766,000 8,999,000 1,547,000 7,889,000 1,977,200 149,000 1,509,000 980,000 1,408,500 729,000 12,382,800 9,202,100 5,941,900 41,785,000 4,484,100 9,879,900 998,000 4,774,500 678,000 27,228,300 2,840,600 3,545,900 7,545,800 23,995,200 27,369,600 3,970,000 25,947,600 32,292,000 7,129,800 5,419,100 4,962,000 10,730,000 1,320,400 3,479,700 3,093,600 33-27 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS. U.S. ARMY 1981 LOS ANGELES COUNTY DRAINAGE AREA, CALIF.: LATEST APPROVED ESTIMATED FIRST COSTS FOR ALL UNITS OF IMPROVEMENT UNDER EXISTING PROJECT TABLE 33-F (Cont'd) (See Section 21 of Text) Latest Approved Estimated Cost 1976' Project Units Federal Local' Total Sierra Madre Villa channel 781,400 366,000 1,147,400 Sierra Madre Wash 1,732,000 248,000 1,980,000 Ballona Creek Basin: Ballona Creek channel 746,600 - 746,600 Benedict Canyon system 15,284,900 3,785,000 19,069,900 Centinela Creek 4,083,800 4,788,000 8,871,800 Sawtelle-Westwood system (including Sepulveda channel) 9,620,700 1,492,000 11,112,700 Subtotal 274,736,000 76,300,000 351,036,000 Grand total for comprehensive plan 354,554,000 76,300,000 430,854,000 1. Excludes estimated cost for Code 710 funds and system channel estimate, which was increased by $42,000 to estimated cost for minor rehabilitation. permit rounding of overall non-Federal estimate to three 2. Approved by Los Angeles County Flood Control significant figures. District as of September 30, 1976, except for Walnut Creek TABLE 33-G SANTA ANA RIVER BASIN (AND ORANGE COUNTY), CALIF.: LATEST APPROVED ESTIMATED FEDERAL FIRST COST FOR ALL UNITS (See Section 26 of Text) Estimated Cost Project Total Latest Revision Date ACTIVE UNIT' Completed: Brea Dam Fullerton Dam Lytle and Cajon Creeks channel improvements Prado Dam San Antonio and Chino Creeks channel San Antonio Dam Completed Except for Minor Completion Items: Carbon Canyon Dam and channel INACTIVE UNITS 5 Aliso Creek Dam San Juan Dam Trabuco Dam DEAUTHORIZED UNIT5 Villa Park Dam $1,189,0682 411,0762 7,612,000 9,473,2732 10,924,170 7,001,1764 5,150,0002 340,000 5,960,000 2,190,000 2,270,000 3 33 3 3 1961 1954 1954 1954 1954 1. For details, see section 26 of text. 2. Not including estimated cost of Code 710 funds. 3. Plant in service. 4. Includes $5,000 working funds. 5. For additional information, see "Other Authorized Flood Control Projects." 33-28 TABLE 33-H LOS ANGELES, CALIF., DISTRICT INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 31 of Text) Project Banning levee-San Gorgonio River, Whitewater River Basin, Calif. City Creek levee, Santa Ana River Basin, Calif. Devil, East Twin, and Warm Creeks channel improvements and Lytle Creek levee, Santa Ana River Basin, Calif. Los Angeles County drainage area, Calif., channels Lytle and Cajon Creeks channel improvements, Santa Ana River Basin (and Orange County), Calif. Mill Creek levees, Santa Ana River Basin, Calif. Needles, San Bernardino County, Calif. Oro Grande Wash channel improvements, Mojave River Basin, Calif. Quail Wash levee, Joshua Tree, San Bernardino County, Calif. Riverside levees, Santa Ana River Basin, Calif. Rose Creek channel improvements, San Diego, Calif. San Diego River channel and levees, San Diego River Basin, Calif. San Jacinto River levee and Bautista Creek channel, Santa Ana River Basin, Calif. Santa Clara River levee improvement, Santa Clara River Basin, Calif. Santa Maria Valley levees, Santa Maria River Basin, Calif. Stewart Canyon debris basin and channel, Ventura River Basin, Calif. Tahchevah Creek detention basin and channel improvements, Whitewater River Basin, Calif. Ventura River levee, Ventura River Basin, Calif. Winslow (tributaries of Little Colorado River), Little Colorado River Basin, Ariz. (part) Emergency Flood Control Projects: Clifton, Ariz. Eloy, Ariz. Holbrook Ariz. Jerome, Ariz. Tucson, Ariz. May 1981 May 1981 May 1981 May, June, July, and August 1981 May 1981 May 1981 May 1981 May 1981 May 1981 May 1981 July 1981 July 1981 May 1981 July 1981 July 1981 September 1981 May 1981 September 1981 July 1981 May 1981 July 1981 July 1981 July 1981 June 1981 TABLE 33-I OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 33 of Text) For Last Cost to Sept. 30, 1981 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance rfi, i('.m.l ta .QSan --rawrinnIt ( ytu (a1if 1 2 - 400A000 - Viiy Vree evvee, naCi llai uuiu .vvuu y, .iain. Gila River Basin, Ariz.: Camelsback Dam (Gila River) (inactive) Gila and Salt Rivers levee and channel improvements Lower Gila River levee and channel improvements Gila River and tributaries downstream from Painted Rock Dam) (inactive) Middle Gila River channel improvements, upper end of Safford Valley to Buttes damsite (Camelsback damsite to Salt River) Pinal Creek channel improvements (Globe) (deferred) Santa Rosa Wash (Tat Momolikot Dam and Lake St. Clair) Hodges Dam, San Dieguito River Basin, Calif.s Date 1963 1966 1975 1970 1968 1979 1958 73,201' 2,413,051 402,867 121,509' 10,177,3576 33-29 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS TABLE 33-I (Cont'd) (See Section 33 of Text) For Last Cost to Sept. 30, 1981 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Holbrook levee, Little Colorado River, Colorado River Basin, Ariz. 2 Las Vegas Wash tributaries, Colorado River Basin, Nev. 6 Needles, San Bernardino County, Calif.' 2 Oro Grande Wash channel improvements, Mojave River Basin, Calif.' 2 Quail Wash levee, Joshua Tree, San Bernardino County, Calif.' 2 Ridgecrest, Kern County, Calif.' 9 Rose Creek channel improvements, San Diego, Calif.' 2 San Diego River (Mission Valley), San Diego River Basin, Calif. Santa Ana River Basin, Calif.: Devil, East Twin, and Warm Creeks channel improvements and Lytle Creek levee2 Mill Creek levees2 Riverside levees2 San Jacinto River levee and Bautista Creek channel2 Santa Ana River Basin (and Orange County), Calif.: Aliso Creek Dam (inactive) San Juan Dam (inactive) Trabuco Dam (inactive) Villa Park Dam 6 Santa Clara River levee improvement, Santa Clara River Basin, Calif.2 Tijuana River Basin, Calif.2 University .Wash and Spring Brook, Riverside, Calif. (inactive) Ventura River Basin, Calif.: Stewart Canyon debris basin and channel2 Ventura River levee 2 Whitewater River Basin, Calif.: Banning levee-San Gorgonio River, Riverside County' 2 Chino Canyon improvements, Palm Springs' 2 Tahchevah Creek detention basin and channel improvements 2 Tahquitz Creek (inactive) Winslow (tributaries of Little Colorado River), Little Colorado River Basin, Ariz. (deferred) 1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of section 205, Public Law 80-858, as amended. 2. Completed. 3. Excludes $371,058 other contributed funds. 4. Advance planning only. 5. Includes $2,488 expended in FY 1981. 6. Deauthorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of section 12, Public Law 93-251. 7. Excludes $619,912 required contributed funds and $91,160 other contributed funds. 8. Excludes $514,806 required contributed funds and $176,295 other contributed funds. 9. Terminated. 10. Excludes $251,000 required contributed funds and $154,733 other contributed funds. 11. Excludes $200,000 required contributed funds and $1,641,668 other contributed funds. 12. Excludes $35,830 other contributed funds. 13. Excludes $327,723 other contributed funds. 14. International Boundary and Water Commission funds. 15. Excludes $179,148 other, contributed funds. 16. Includes $6,000 Code 710 funds since FY 1977. Excludes $17,006 other contributed funds. Includes $339 expended in FY 1981. 17. Excludes $8,718 required contributed funds and $53,470 other contributed funds. 18. Excludes $74,718 required contributed funds. 19. Includes $5 expended in FY 1981. 33-30 1950 1964 1973 1970 1973 1972 1978 1962 1961 1959 1962 1950 1961 1979 1975 1964 1950 1966 1973 1967 1974 1973 335,000 295,191 1,000,0007 1,000,0008 212,745 195,194 982,43210 1,708,428 7,753,93711 617,89012 2,104,478 3,026,97413 67,361 2,126,672 1,703,03114 213,313 939,90815 1,349,63816 97,868 819,87817 1,420,55218 1,063,60019 1,831,300 - LOS ANGELES, CALIF., DISTRICT FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 80-858, As Amended (Preauthorization) TABLE 33-J (See Section 34 of Text) Project Fiscal Year Costs Bear Creek, La Quinta, Calif. $83,928 Newhall Creek, Newhall, Calif. 18,222 South Fork of the Santa Clara River, Santa Clarita Valley, Calif. 80,807 Telegraph Canyon Creek, Chula Vista, Calif. 5,366 West Magnesia Canyon channel, Rancho Mirage, Calif. 177,478 33-31 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIF., DISTRICT* This district comprises the Klamath River Basin in southern Oregon and portions of northern and western California consisting of drainage basins tributary to the Pacific Ocean from the Oregon-California state line on the north to Cape San Martin, Calif., on the south, except for basins tributary to the San Francisco Bay system which lie east of the Benicia-Martinez Bridge. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Bodega Bay, Calif............... ............. Crescent City Harbor, Calif.................. Humboldt Harbor and Bay, Calif. ........................ .. ....... Moss Landing Harbor, Calif ................. Napa River, Calif...... ................. Noyo River and Harbor, Calif.. ........... Oakland Harbor, Calif....................... Petaluma River, Calif......................... Redwood City Harbor, Calif.... ........... Richmond Harbor, Calif ..................... San Francisco Bay to Stockton, Calif. (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels) ........................ San Francisco Bay and Delta Model, Calif. ............................. San Francisco Harbor, Calif.................... San Francisco Harbor and Bay, (removal of drift), Calif. ....................... San Pablo Bay and Mare Island Strait, Calif.............. .............. San Rafael Creek, Calif...................... Santa Cruz Harbor, Calif .................... Suisun Bay Channel, Calif ................... Protection of Navigation..................... Reconnaissance and condition surveys .............. ................ Page 34-2 34-2 34-3 34-3 34-3 34-4 34-4 34-5 34-5 34-5 34-6 34-6 34-7 34-7 34-7 34-8 34-8 34-8 34-9 34-9 Navigation (Cont'd) Page 21. Other authorized navigation projects ........................................ 34-9 22. Navigation work under special authorization............................ 34-9 Beach Erosion Control 23. Other authorized beach erosion control projects................................ 34-9 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. Flood Control Alhambra Creek, Calif.... ................... 34-9 Pajaro River Basin, Calif ..................... 34-10 Russian River Basin, Calif ...................... 34-10 Walnut Creek, Calif...................... 34-11 Inspection of completed flood control projects................................ 34-11 Other authorized flood control projects ..................... ................ 34-12 Flood control work under special authorization ................. ................ 34-12 General Investigations Surveys.................................. 34-12 Collection and study of basic data ................................... 34-12 Coordination with other agencies ................. ................... 34-12 Research and development................. 34-12 *All cost and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 34-1 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 Navigation 1. BODEGA BAY, CALIF. Location. A triangular lagoon on California Coast, 85 miles south of Noyo River and 58 miles north of San Francisco. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 5603.) Existing project. Entrance jetties 1,130 and 1,650 feet long, a bulkhead to retain the sandspit, and a channel shore. A channel 12 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and 16,020 feet long to town of Bodega Bay thence southeasterly along shore, with 3 turning basins 12 feet deep and 300 to 400 feet wide at inner end of entrance channel, at junction of bay and shore channels near town of Bodega Bay, and at southerly end of shore channel. The current proposed plan of improvement consists of general navigation facilities in the Spud Point area on the west side of the harbor. Federal construction would consist of a dredged channel (1,960 feet by 12 feet) connecting with the existing entrance channel and a concrete breakwater, 1,306 feet long, near Spud Point. A marina and attendant facilities for about 238 boats would be constructed by local interests. Approved estimated cost for new work (1981) is $4,140,000, of which $2,350,000 is Federal (including $40,000 Coast Guard costs) and $1,790,000 is non-Federal (includes $1,220,000 cash contribution). Major rehabilitation of jetties and channels cost $397,779, exclusive of $2,000 contributed funds. Existing project was adopted by River and Harbor Acts of 1938 and 1965 (H. Docs. 619, 7th Cong., 3d sess., and 106, 89th Cong., 1st sess., contains latest published map). Local cooperation. Fully complied with for work performed. Current proposed plan requires local interests (a) contribute in cash 34.5 percent of the first cost of the breakwater and access channel, an amount presently estimated at $1,130,000, and 71.7 percent of the total cost of mitigation, an amount presently estimated at $235,000, which includes cash of $90,000 and a contribution-in-kind to restore the marsh adjacent to the Old Airport site estimated at $145,000; (b) provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way required for the construction and subsequent maintenance of the projects and for aids-to-navigation upon the request of the Chief of Engineers, including suitable areas determined by the Chief of Engineers to be required in the general public interest for initial and subsequent disposal of dredged material and also necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads, and embankments therefore, and necessary controls for groundwater protection or the costs of such works; (c) hold and save the United States free from claims from damages which may result from construction and subsequent maintenance of the project, except damages due to fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; (d) establish regulations prohibiting discharge of untreated sewage, garbage, or other pollutants into waters of the harbor; (e) provide and maintain berthing areas, floats, piers, slips, and similar marina and mooring facilities as needed for about 240 transient and local vessels, as well as necessary access roads, parking areas, and other needed public use shore facilities open to all on equal terms; (f) assure the accomplishment, without cost to the United States, of such alterations as required in sewer, water supply, drainage, transportation facilities, and other utilities, as well as their maintenance; and (g) accomplish at local expense the rehabilitation of disposal sites by grading and assuring revegetation of the sites to provide upland habitat areas subsequent to the consolidation of the dredged material, and the maintenance thereof. The Board of Supervisors of Sonoma County, by Resolution No. 41228, adopted June 27, 1973, supports a project consisting of dredging improvements to alleviate the navigational problems. By Resolution No. 54194, dated June 28, 1976, they requested the Corps to resume and complete preconstruction planning based on the Spud Point Alternative. California Assembly Bill (AB 2855) passed in September 1978 authorized state loans for the project. At the final Public Meeting on the proposed project plan, on July 30, 1981, local interests indicated their strong support and continued willingness and ability to meet requirements of local cooperation. Sonoma County Resolution No. 70215, dated September 1, 1981, reaffirmed support for the modified project. In accordance with Section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (Public Law 91-611), a written agreement covering local cooperation for the project will be executed prior to initiation of construction. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Advance engineering and design for the channel and breakwater is about 80 percent complete. Maintenance: Engineering and design by hired labor including removal of 69,609 cubic yards of shoaled material from Bodega Bay by contract, cost $139,609. Condition at end of fiscal year. Planning is about 80 percent complete. Jetties, bulkhead, and main Bodega Bay channels and turning basins were completed in 1943. Major rehabilitation of channels and south jetty was completed in August 1961. 2. CRESCENT CITY HARBOR, CALIF. Location. Harbor is 17 miles south of Oregon State line, 125 miles south of Coos Bay, Oreg., 70 miles north of Humboldt Bay, Calif., and midway between San Francisco Bay and mouth of Columbia River. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 5895.) Existing project. A rubblemound outer breakwater extending about 3,700 feet on a bearing of S. 27 degrees E.; from Battery Point, thence about 1,000 feet on a bearing of S. 80 degrees E.; for maintenance dredging of an outer harbor basin 1,800 feet long and 1,400 feet wide to 20 foot depth at mean lower low water, except in rock; a rubblemound sand barrier from Whaler Island to easterly shore and maintenance dredging at seaward end of sand barrier; an inner breakwater extending northwesterly about 1,200 feet from Whaler Island, thence westerly 400 feet to form a protected fish-boat harbor; for removal of pinnacle rock in fish-boat harbor to 20-foot depth; and a T-shaped inner harbor basin 20 feet deep, 1,500 feet long extending along north side of Citizen's Dock for 325 feet, with a stem 1,000 feet long. Deepening of the harbor adjacent to Citizen's Dock was found to be not economically feasible, and this portion was reclassified to the inactive category. Approved estimated cost for new work (1981) is $3,812,000, (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period), of which $3,661,000 is Federal cost (includes $11,000 Coast Guard costs) and $151,000 is non-Federal cost (includes $54,000 cash contribution); completed modifications $6,049,000; inactive portion of Citizen's Dock in the Inner Harbor Basin $2,500,000 and $217,000 contributed by local interests. Major rehabilitation of outer breakwater cost $525,000. (See table 34-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed modifications and acts of 1927, 1937, 1945, and 1965 portion for construction of 400-foot extension of the inner breakwater. The Board, by its Resolution No. 77-10, dated 34-2 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIF., DISTRICT September 6, 1977, reaffirmed its intention to meet the requirements of local cooperation. A notification was received by letter from the President of the Board, dated February 10, 1978, stating that the area serving the Citizen's Dock should not be included at this time. Rights-of-way are publicly owned and available for public use. Resolution No. 81-1 of March 17, 1981 gives assurarice that the Harbor District will provide a cash contribution of $54,000 in lieu of providing land disposal sites. An agreement in conformance with the requirements of Section 221, Flood Control Act of 1970, Public Law 91-611, will be obtained from the local sponsor. By Board of Harbor Commissioners letter dated February 10, 1978, local interests concurred in deletion of Citizen's Dock dredging and reaffirmed support for dredging in the vicinity of the oil dock. Terminal facilities. Three piers, one of which is publicly owned and from which boats are fueled; one oil terminal; and a private mooring for barges discharging petroleum products to pipelines on inner breakwater. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Planning for dredging to 20 feet in the vicinity of the Petroleum Dock is complete. Maintenance: Engineering and design by hired labor and completion of repair of outer breakwater by contract, cost $235,952. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for deepening and enlarging the inner harbor basin adjacent to Petroleum Dock to a depth of 20 feet and deepening of the harbor adjacent to Citizen's Dock which was found to be not economically justified and reclassified to the "inactive" category in 1978. The 3,000-foot outer breakwater was completed in 1930, sand barrier in 1939, inner breakwater in 1946, removal of pinnacle rock in 1951, and outer breakwater extension in 1957. Major rehabilitation of outer breakwater was completed in 1964 and again in 1980. The 400-foot extension of inner breakwater was completed in 1973. 3. HUMBOLDT HARBOR AND BAY, CALIF. Location. Humboldt Bay is a landlocked harbor on coast of California, 225 miles north of San Francisco Bay and 70 miles south of Crescent City Harbor. (See Coast Geodetic Survey Chart 5832.) Previous projects. For details see pages 1982-84 of Annual Report for 1915, page 1673 of Annual Report for 1929, and page 1689 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For details, see pages 3 and 4 of Annual Report for 1979. New work completed in 1979, cost $7,585,928; excludes $95,000 contributed funds and Coast Guard costs and amounts expended on previous projects. (See table 34-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for work performed. For details see Annual Report for 1977. Terminal facilities. There are 37 wharves and piers, 3 of which are publicly owned; 4 oil terminals; 1 privately owned submarine pipeline for petroleum products; 2 boat-building and repair plants; 1 boat-icing plant; 6 small boat fueling stations; 2 small yacht and fishboat basins, 1 of which is publicly owned; and numerous log booms and small landings; exclusive of facilities owned by the United States. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design by hired labor, including dredging surveys of project channels, and U.S. hopper dredges Harding, Pacific, and Yaquina removed 465,500 cubic yards of shoaled material from the bar and entrance channel, 280,000 cubic yards from North Bay channel, and 72,300 cubic yards from Fields Landing channel, cost $950,736. Condition at end of fiscal year. North jetty was completed in 1925; south jetty in 1927; Arcata channel in 1931; entrance channel, 30 feet deep and 50 feet wide, in 1935; Fields Landing channel and turning basin and Eureka and Samoa channels, to 26 feet deep, in 1939; entrance channel to 40 feet deep, and Eureka, Samoa, and North Bay channels to 30 feet deep in 1954; and dredging North Bay anchorage area completed 1979. Total cost of existing project as of September 30, 1981, was $38,993,018, of which $7,680,928 was for new work ($7,585,928 regular funds, excludes Coast Guard costs, and $95,000 contributed funds) and $31,312,090 regular funds for maintenance. Project is complete. 4. MOSS LANDING HARBOR, CALIF. Location. About 80 miles south of San Francisco Harbor on Monterey Bay about midway between cities of Santa Cruz and Monterey. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 5403.) Existing project. Entrance channel 200 feet wide and 15 feet deep, protected by jetties, from Monterey Bay into inner lagoon at Moss Landing, thence a channel in the lagoon, 100 feet wide, 15 feet deep, and about 3,000 feet long extending southerly from entrance, with a flared widening to 200 feet for 400 feet long at southerly end. Project new work completed in 1947 cost $343,552. Existing project authorized by 1945 River and Harbor Act (report on file in Office, Chief of Engineers). No map has been published. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for work performed. Local interests must furnish rights-of-way and suitable bulkheaded spoil-disposal areas for maintenance work. Terminal facilities. Five piers, one of which has boatfueling facilities, one marine way, a boat launching ramp, and a number of mooring and berthing facilities within the protected harbor. Outside the harbor in Monterey Bay is one submerged petroleum pipeline. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscaryear. Maintenance: Engineering and design by hired labor, cost $74,622. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project completed in 1947. 5. NAPA RIVER, CALIF. Location. Rises in St. Helena Mountains, flows in a southerly direction, and empties into Mare Island Strait. Navigable portion is a tidal estuary. Head of navigation is at Third Street in city of Napa, 16.2 miles above mouth. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 5533.) Previous projects. Original project was adopted by River and Harbor Act of August 11, 1888, and modified by River and Harbor Act of March 2, 1919. For further details, see page 1756, Annual Report for 1930, and page 1683, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Adopted by Acts of August 30, 1935 and July 24, 1946. Provides for a channel 15 feet deep and 100 feet wide between mouth at Mare Island Strait and Asylum Slough and 10 feet deep and 75 feet wide thence to Third ,Street in Napa with a cutoff at Horseshoe Bend, a turning 34-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 basin 300 feet wide at Jacks Bend, and additional widenings and realignment in other difficult sections. Length of section included in project is 16.2 miles. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 6 feet at mouth and 7.1 feet at head of navigation. Extreme range is about 11 feet. Project was completed in 1950 except for dikes and revetments authorized for construction if required. Cost of completed work was $1,021,274, exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects. Dikes and revetments portion of project is to be restudied. Cost of this portion, last revised in 1954, was estimated to be $145,726. Average annual maintenance cost for past 5 years was $82,599. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for work performed to date. Local interests must furnish lands, easements, rights-of-way, and spoil-disposal areas, and provide necessary spoil impounding and drainage works for channel maintenance. Terminal facilities. There are 4 drydocks, 1 vessel outfitting wharf, 7 wharves used in connection with oil distributing plants, 3 wharves for general cargoes and other miscellaneous purposes, and 1 salt terminal. There are also numerous small yacht mooring facilities along the river. These facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design by hired labor and maintenance dredging by contract, cost $231,167. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was completed in 1950 except for dikes and revetments, to be constructed if required. Work authorized by act of August 30, 1935, was completed in 1937. Controlling depths over various sections of project on dates indicated were: July 1952, 15 feet from Mare Island Causeway to Goodluck Point; September 1981, 6.1 feet at Goodluck Point, thence 10.5 feet to Dutton Landing, 8.8 feet to Bull Island, 9.1 feet to Ratto Landing, 7.6 feet to Horseshoe Bend Cutoff, 2.7 feet to Asylum Slough, 7.5 feet to Carr Bend, +0.7 feet at Carr Bend, 4.9 feet to Imola Bridge, and 6.5 feet to head of project. Cost of existing project to end of fiscal year was $1,021,274 for new work and $1,002,305 for maintenance, a total of $2,023,579 regular funds. 6. NOYO RIVER AND HARBOR, CALIF. Location. Noyo Harbor is a cove on California coast about 87 miles south of Humboldt Bay and 135 miles northwest of San Francisco. Noyo River rises in the Coast Range, flows westerly, and empties into Noyo Harbor. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 5703.) Previous projects. For details see page 1680, Annual Report for 1929, and page 1772, Annual Report for 1930. Existing project. Provides for two entrance jetties; an entrance channel into Noyo River 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide and channel in river 10 feet deep and 150 feet wide extending about 0.6 mile above mouth, thence connecting channel about 400 feet long to mooring basin of about 8.5 acres 10 feet deep on south bank of river. Cost of new work construction completed in 1931 was $184,000, exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects. Minor rehabilitation of jetties completed in 1961 cost $222,810 exclusive of $1,700 contributed funds. A 400-foot channel extension, mooring basin and connecting channel were constructed by Noyo Harbor District in 1968. Approved estimated cost (1981) of new work including the breakwater and channel improvements, (1962 River and Harbor Act modified by 1976 WRDA), is $5,980,000 for the breakwater, of which $5,840,000 is Federal (includes $50,000 Coast Guard costs) and $140,000 is non-Federal cost (cash contribution); and $1,790,000 for the channel extension, of which $1,750,000 is Federal (includes $50,000 Coast Guard costs) and $40,000 is non-Federal cost (cash contribution). (See table 34-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for work performed. For details see Annual Report for 1973. Terminal facilities. None in harbor proper. In river above harbor there are 9 fish-receiving stations; 3 boat fueling docks; 2 boat building and repair plants; 1 boat icing plant; 3 marine ways; and 1 privately owned marina facility. These facilities, together with those provided in the public mooring basin are not adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Planning for proposed breakwater (WRDA of 1976) is about 20 percent complete; and the proposed channel extension is about 30 percent complete. Maintenance: Engineering and design by hired labor including removal of 15,900 cubic yards of shoaled material from entrance and river channels, by contract, cost $204,669. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for construction of breakwaters in Noyo Harbor and additional channel improvements. Jetties, rock removal, and dredging entrance and river channels completed in 1931. Minor rehabilitation of jetties and north wall completed in September 1961. Mooring basin and connecting channel in river, constructed by local interests, was completed in October 1968. Total cost of existing project as of September 30, 1981, was $4,498,853, of which $919,219 was for new work, $3,579,634 for maintenance ($3,575,634 regular funds and $4,000 contributed funds), and $224,510 for minor rehabilitation of jetties and north wall ($222,810 regular funds and $1,700 contributed funds). 7. OAKLAND HARBOR, CALIF. Location. On eastern side of San Francisco Bay, opposite city of San Francisco. Inner harbor is between cities of Oakland and Alameda. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 5535.) Previous project. For details see page 1979 of Annual Report for 1915, page 1755 of Annual Report for 1921, and page 1674 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For details see Annual Report for 1977 (See table 34-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for work performed. For details see Annual Report for 1973. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 31, "The Ports of Oakland, Alameda, Richmond, and Vallejo and Ports on Carquinez Strait, Calif." revised 1974. Facilities are adequate for existing commerce with the construction of nine additional deepwater berths at 7th Street Terminal in 1980. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance of Fruitvale Avenue highway and bridges, including engineering and design by hired labor, cost $155,951; and U.S. hopper dredges, Biddle and Harding removed 348,000 cubic yards of shoaled material from the inner harbor, cost $166,743. 34-4 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIF., DISTRICT Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was completed February 1975, except for deepening the tidal canal to 35 feet from Fortman Basin to Park Street (River and Harbor Act 1962) and to 25 feet above Park Street (River and Harbor Act 1927) which was deauthorized November 1977. Jetties were completed in 1894. Dredging existing project channels was carried on from 1910 to 1931 when 30- foot depth was attained. The 35-foot depth in channel to outer harbor was attained in 1942 with military funds. Reconstruction of the Fruitvale Avenue Highway Bridge completed December 1973. Dredging from entrance to Ninth Avenue wharf completed February 1975. Cost of existing project as of September 30, 1981, was $28,465,724, of which $7,145,018 was for new work ($6,747,752 regular funds and $397,266 contributed funds), and $21,320,706 regular funds for maintenance. 8. PETALUMA RIVER, CALIF. Location. Rises in hills north of Petaluma, flows southeasterly about 20 miles, and empties into northwest side of San Pablo Bay about 22 miles from San Francisco. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 5533.) Previous projects. For details, see page 1982 of Annual Report for 1915, page 1665 of Annual Report for 1919, and page 1684 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. A channel 8 feet deep and 200 feet wide in San Pablo Bay to mouth of river; thence 8 feet deep and 100 feet wide in river to Western Avenue, Petaluma, including a depth of 8 feet in turning basin; thence 4 feet deep and 50 feet wide to Washington Street Bridge; thence 4 feet deep and 40 feet wide to a point 935 feet above Washington Street Bridge. (A portion about 975 feet above Washington Street Bridge was recommended for deletion by report "San Francisco Bay and Tributaries," December 1974). All depths refer to mean lower low water. Section under improvement is 19.5 miles long, of which 5 miles are in San Pablo Bay downstream from mouth of river. Cost of new work, completed in 1933, was $85,063, exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects. Existing project adopted by 1930 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 183, 70th Cong., 1st sess., which contains published map). Local cooperation. Fully complied with for work performed. Local interests must furnish satisfactory areas with necessary levees, spillways, and drainage works for proper disposal of spoil from maintenance. Terminal facilities. There are wharves and piers, 1 small yacht harbor with fueling facilities, and 11 small landings, all privately owned. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design by hired labor, including removal of 177,900 cubic yards of shoaled material of Petaluma River by contract, cost $422,978. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was completed in 1933. Total cost of existing project as of September 30, 1981, was $4,464,340, of which $85,063 was for new work and $4,379,277 regular funds for maintenance. 9. REDWOOD CITY HARBOR, CALIF. Location. On Redwood Creek, a tributary of San Francisco Bay about 20 miles south of city of San Francisco. Project works also include a channel in San Francisco Bay east of Point San Bruno. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 5531.) Previous projects. For details see page 1979 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1672 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Channel 500 feet wide and 30 feet deep across San Bruno Shoal in San Francisco Bay; a channel 300 feet wide and 30 feet deep to vicinity of confluence of West Point Slough and Redwood Creek, with a basin at that location 2,200 feet long and from 400 to 900 feet wide; thence a channel 400 feet wide, 30 feet deep, and about 1,300 feet long flaring to a second turning basin about 900 feet wide, 1,700 feet long, and 30 feet deep, thence a channel 150 feet wide and 5 feet deep extending to Steinberger Slough. Cost of new work, completed in 1965, was $1,641,279 exclusive of $119,572 contributed by local interests and amounts expended on previous projects. (See table 34-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. (For details see Annual Report for 1973.) Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 30, "The Ports of San Francisco and Redwood City," revised 1974. A new public wharf, a privately owned pier for receipts of sand and gravel, and a marine repair works pier have been constructed since 1962. Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design including dredging surveys by hired labor and 237,500 cubic yards of shoaled material removed by contract, cost $962,250. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project completed in .January 1965. Total cost of existing project to end of fiscal year was $6,304,023 of which $1,760,851 was for new work ($1,641,279 regular funds and $119,572 contributed funds) and $4,543,172 regular funds for maintenance. 10. RICHMOND HARBOR, CALIF. Location. On eastern shore of San Francisco Bay about 10 miles north of Oakland. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 5532.) Existing project. Provides for channel 35 feet deep and 600 feet wide adjacent to Southampton Shoal from deep water in San Francisco Bay to outer harbor; inner harbor entrance channel 35 feet deep and 600 feet wide from deep water to Point Richmond, with a turning basin at that point, thence a channel 35 feet deep and 500 feet wide flaring to about 600 feet at Point Potrero with a turn at that point 1,150 feet wide and 35 feet deep except for a depth of 30 feet at southerly apex of bend; thence 35 feet deep and 850 feet wide to entrance to Santa Fe Channel; 2,000 feet, and maintenance to depth of 30 feet of remainder of Santa Fe Channel and basin; a rubblemound training wall 10,000 feet long extending westerly from Brooks Island; approach areas 32 feet deep to within 75 feet of pierhead line in outer harbor at Point San Pablo and Point Orient; a channel 20 feet deep, 150 feet wide, and about 2,000 feet long from deep water in San Pablo Bay easterly along north side of Point San Pablo; a maneuvering area at Richmond Long wharf 45 feet deep and a West Richmond Channel 45 feet deep, 600 feet wide, and about 2.5 miles long through west navigation opening of Richmond-San Rafael Bridge which are authorized but have not been constructed. New work, completed in 1957, cost $2,886,695, exclusive of $524,778 contributed by local interests. Estimated cost (1981) for 45-foot-deep maneuvering area at Richmond Long wharf and for West Richmond 34-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 Channel, authorized as part of "San Francisco Bay to Stockton, Calif. (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels)" project, is about $29,075,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period). (See table 34-B for authorizing legislation.). Local cooperation. Fully complied with for work performed. Estimated cost for all requirements under terms of project authorization, including required non-Federal contributions was $4 million (price as of dates of compliance). Local interests must furnish easements and spoil-disposal areas for maintenance dredging. (See Sacramento District Annual Report for "San Francisco Bay to Stockton, Calif. (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels)" for requirements of Act of October 27, 1965.) By Resolution adopted August 6, 1963, Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County indicated willingness to meet requirements applicable to West Richmond Channel and maneuvering area at Richmond Long wharf. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 31, "The Ports of Oakland, Alameda, Richmond, and Vallejo, and Ports on Carquinez Strait, Calif.," revised 1974. A privately owned dock for receipt of sand and gravel and two small-boat basins have been constructed since 1962. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Planning of San Francisco Bay to Stockton project continued. Maintenance: Engineering and design and U.S. hopper dredge, Harding removed 348,000 cubic yards of shoaled material from inner harbor, cost $549,636. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project completed in 1957, except for dredging West Richmond Channel and enlarging and deepening to 45 feet the maneuvering area at Richmond Long wharf authorized as part of San Francisco Bay to Stockton project. Dredging project channels was initiated in 1918 and carried on intermittently until 1940. Training wall was completed in 1931, and channel in San Pablo Bay in 1945. Dredging authorized by act of September 3, 1954, was initiated in October 1955 and the Southampton Shoal Channel and enlarging and deepening to 35 feet the approach area to Richmond Long wharf was completed in March 1956, inner harbor channels in December 1956, Santa Fe Channel in January 1957, and removal of rock near Point Potrero in October 1957. Minor rehabilitation of training wall completed in 1967. 11. SAN FRANCISCO BAY TO STOCKTON, CALIF. (JOHN F. BALDWIN AND STOCKTON SHIP CHANNELS) Location. On navigation channels extending from entrance to San Francisco Bay to vicinity of Pittsburg through San Francisco, Marin, Contra Costa, and Solano Counties. (See Coast and Geodetic Charts 5527 and 5532-5534 for respective areas.) Existing project. Project provides for modification of existing San Francisco Harbor, Richmond Harbor, San Pablo Bay and Mare Island Strait, Suisun Bay Channel to vicinity of Pittsburg and Navigation projects to provide depths of 55 feet for San Francisco Bay Channel (completed), 45 feet (currently 35 feet) for main internal bay channels upstream to vicinity of Pittsburg; enlargement and deepening to 45 feet (currently 35 feet) of maneuvering areas adjacent to major petroleum refinery terminals along channel route; widening Suisun Bay Channel. Approved cost estimate (1981) of Federal cost (Corps), see Sacramento District Annual Report. Existing project was adopted by 1965 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 208, 89th Cong., 1st sess., contains latest published map). Local cooperation. See Sacramento District Annual Report. Terminal facilities. See Part 2, Port Series No. 30, 31, and 32, revised 1974, titled respectively: "The Ports of San Francisco and Redwood City, Calif."; "The Ports of Oakland, Alameda, Richmond, Vallejo, and Ports on Carquinez Strait, Calif." Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce and will be adequate for future commerce upon completion of new terminal facilities. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Continued planning activities. Condition at end of fiscal year. Planning activities continued. San Francisco Harbor Main Ship Channel was, completed Feburary 1974. 12. SAN FRANCISCO BAY AND DELTA MODEL, CALIF. Location. The model, including a regional visitor center, is located in Sausalito, Calif., adjacent to San Francisco Bay about two miles north of the Golden Gate Bridge. Existing project. The San Francisco Bay/Delta Model, which covers 17 miles of the Pacific Ocean beyond Golden Gate, all of San Francisco Bay proper, San Pablo Bay, Suisun Bay, and all of the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta east of Suisun Bay to the cities of Sacramento on the northeast and Stockton and Tracy on the south, was constructed in a rehabilitated warehouse at Sausalito, Calif., as a part of the San Francisco Bay, including San Pablo Bay, Suisun Bay, and other adjacent bays, California Study, authorized by the River and Harbor Act of May 17, 1950 (PL 81-516, Section 110). Operation and maintenance of the model was authorized in the Water Resources Development Act of 1974 (PL 93-251, Section 8). The model has successfully reproduced to the proper scale the rise and fall of the tide, flow and currents of water, salinity intrusion, and trends in disposition of sediments. It is a useful tool to examine forces existing in the bay and estuarine system and to predict results of proposed changes. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: O()peration and maintenance of the model continued. Construction of the regional visitor center was completed September 1980 and the central exhibits are expected to be completed )ecember 1981. Operations and maintenance cost, $6 18,490. Condition at end of fiscal year. Original model constructio() n was initiated 1956 and completed 1957, and addition of Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta to the original model was initiatedl 1966 and completed 1969. Continued testing of proposals affecting the environmental quality of the region including, but not limited to: salinity intrusion, dispersion of pollutants, water quality, improvements for navigation, (lre(tging, bay fill, physical structures, other shoreline changes. Total cost of regional visitor exhibits and model as of September 3(), 1981, was $7,()3(),2()2, of which $3,277,630 was for the regional visitor center, $3.),711 for exhibits, and $:,,:858, 6l for maintenance. 34-6 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIF., DISTRICT 13. SAN FRANCISCO HARBOR, CALIF. Location. Works included are in San Francisco Bay, in vicinity of San Francisco, and in approach channels to Golden Gate, the bay entrance. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 5532.) Previous projects. For details see page 1978 of Annual Report for 1915, page 1749 of Annual Report for 1921, page 1633 of Annual Report for 1929, and page 1669 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Dredged channel through San Francisco Bar on line of main ship channel, 55 feet deep and 2,000 feet wide; removal of Presidio Shoal, Black Point Shoal, Rincon Reef Rock (inner), Rincon Reef Rock (outer), Blossom Rock, and Alcatraz Shoal westward of a north-and-south line 2,500 feet west of Alcatraz Light, to 40 feet deep; removal of Arch Rock, Shag Rocks 1 and 2, Harding Rock, Point Knox Shoal westward of a north-and-south line through Point Stuart Light, and a portion of shoal channelward of pierhead line near mouth of Islais Creek, to 35 feet deep; and dredging a channel 750 feet wide and 10 feet deep from that depth in bay to San Francisco Airport ending in a basin 10 feet deep and about 2,000 feet wide. All depths refer to mean lower low water. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 5.7 feet at Fort Point and 7.2 feet at San Francisco Airport. Extreme ranges at foregoing localities are 10.6 and 12 feet respectively. New work completed in 1959 cost $1,658,957, exclusive of $134,591 contributed funds and amounts expended on previous projects. Deepening Bar Channel from 50 to 55 feet, authorized as part of "San Francisco. Bay to Stockton, Calif. (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels)" project, completed in 1974, cost $1,659,000. (See table 34-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for work completed. Local interests must furnish suitably bulkheaded spoil-disposal areas for maintenance of channel to San Francisco Airport. (See Sacramento District Annual Report for "San Francisco Bay to Stockton, Calif. (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels)" for requirements of Act of October 25, 1965.) By Resolution adopted August 6, 1963, Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County indicated willingness to meet requirements applicable to deepening San Francisco Bar Channel. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 30, "The Ports of San Francisco and Redwood City," revised 1974. A new deepwater terminal has been constructed since 1962. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Planning for San Francisco Bay to Stockton project continued. Maintenance: Condition and operation studies and dredging surveys of project channels by hired labor, cost $41,708. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project completed in 1959, and deepening Bar Channel from 50 to 55 feet authorized as part of San Francisco Bay to Stockton project was completed in 1974. Dredging Islais Creek Shoal was completed in 1930, deepening Presidio Shoal in 1931, removal of various rocks in 1932, deepening Point Knox Shoal in 1934, deepening Alcatraz Shoal in 1936, deepening Black Point Shoal in 1937, dredging channel and basin at San Francisco Airport in 1941, and completion of bar channel 50 feet deep in 1959. Cost of existing project as of September 30, 1981, was $16,183,020, of which $1,793,548 was for new work ($1,465,957 regular funds, $193,000 Public Works funds, and $134,591 contributed funds) and $14,389,472 regular funds for maintenance. 14. SAN FRANCISCO HARBOR AND BAY (REMOVAL OF DRIFT), CALIF. Location. Project applies to San Francisco Bay, lower San Francisco Bay, Oakland Harbor, Richmond, San Pablo Bay and Mare Island Strait, Richardson Bay, and their tributaries. Existing project. Collection and removal of drift from San Francisco Bay and its tributary waters. New work portion of project (acquisition of plant and equipment) is estimated to cost (1962) $1,110,000 and is considered inactive since a landfill method of disposal is now being used. Existing project was authorized by 1950 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 268, 81st Cong., 1st sess.). Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Described in pertinent separate project descriptions. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Floating debris was collected and disposed of from project waterways by hired labor. Condition at end of fiscal year. No new work construction funds have been appropriated. Maintenance operations under existing project commenced July 1950. Costs for removal of drift before that time were carried as maintenance on applicable authorized river and harbor projects in the area. Modification of debris-handling facilities to implement the landfill method of disposal in lieu of burning completed 1971. 15. SAN PABLO BAY AND MARE ISLAND STRAIT, CALIF. Location. Channel extends from a point in lower end of San Pablo Bay west of Pinole Point generally northeasterly across Pinole Shoal in San Pablo Bay to junction of Carquinez Strait and Mare Island Strait, thence northwesterly in Mare Island Strait along frontage of Mare Island Navy Yard. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 5533.) Previous projects. For details see page 1680, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Dredged channel across Pinole Shoal in San Pablo Bay 600 feet wide, 35 feet deep, and about 8 miles long; a channel in Mare Island Strait 700 feet wide and 30 feet deep flaring to a turning basin generally 1,000 feet wide from former dike 6, Mare Island, to a line 75 feet southerly from causeway between Vallejo and Mare Island, 30 feet deep, except at northerly end where project depth is 26 feet; maintenance of two approach areas to navy yard piers at southern end of Mare Island. New work completed in 1943 cost $282,669 exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects. Uncompleted dredging of two approach areas at Vallejo and South Vallejo was deauthorized November 6, 1977. Estimated cost (1981) of lengthening and deepening Pinole Shoal Channel to 45 feet and of dredging maneuvering area 45 feet deep at Oleum pier, authorized as part of "San Francisco Bay to Stockton, Calif. (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels)" project but not constructed is about $60,858,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period.) (See table 34-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required for work to date. (See Sacramento District Annual Report for "San Francisco Bay 34-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 to Stockton, Calif. (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels)" for requirements of Act of October 27, 1965.) By resolution adopted August 6, 1963, Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County indicated willingness to meet requirements applicable to deepening Pinole Shoal Channel and dredging maneuvering area at Oleum Pier. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 31, "The Ports of Oakland, Alameda, Richmond, and Vallejo, and Ports on Carquinez Strait," revised 1974. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Planning for San Francisco Bay to Stockton project continued. Maintenance: Engineering and design including dredging surveys by hired labor and U.S. hopper dredge Harding removed 1,092,000 cubic yards of shoaled material from Mare Island Strait, cost $842,745. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was completed in 1943 except for portion which was deauthorized November 6, 1977 (approach areas at Vallejo and South Vallejo) and enlarged Pinole Shoal Channel and maneuvering area at Oleum authorized as part of San Francisco Bay to Stockton project. Pinole Shoal Channel 35 feet deep was completed in 1929. Mare Island Strait Channel and turning basin was completed in 1943. Cost of existing project as of September 30, 1981, was $19,386,313, of which $282,669 was for new work and $19,103,644 for maintenance. 16. SAN RAFAEL CREEK, CALIF. Location. A small, mainly tidal stream about 2 miles in length, flowing easterly and emptying into the west side of San Francisco Bay, 14 miles north of San Francisco. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey chart 5532.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 8 feet deep and 100 feet wide across flats in San Francisco Bay to mouth of creek; thence 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide to Irwin Street, San Rafael; a cutoff through Goose Neck Bend, and a turning basin 200 feet long, 100 feet wide, and 6 feet deep at San Rafael, near head of the project. All depths refer to mean lower low water. The length of section under improvement is 3.5 miles, of which 2 miles are in San Francisco Bay, outside mouth of creek. The total tidal range between lower low water and mean higher high water is 5.7 feet, with an extreme range of 10.5 feet. The cost of new work under the project, completed in 1928, was $32,359, exclusive of $41,094 contributed funds. (See table 34-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Total estimated costs for all requirements of local cooperation under terms of project authorization, including required non-Federal contributions, amount to $41,100 (price as of dates of compliance). Terminal facilities. There are 8 wharves, 6 of which are for the receipt of bulk petroleum products; 2 boat building and repair plants; 4 yacht harbors and 4 boat-fueling stations; and 11 moorings and bulkhead landings, all privately owned. These facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design by hired labor including dredging surveys and 51,599 cubic yards of shoaled material removed from project channels by contract, cost $353,409. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project completed in 1928. 17. SANTA CRUZ HARBOR, CALIF. Location. On north shore of Monterey Bay about 65 miles south of entrance to San Francisco Bay and 14 miles north of Moss Landing, the nearest small-boat harbor. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey charts 5402 and 5403.) Existing project. Provides for a small-boat harbor consisting of two entrance jetties, east jetty 850 feet long and west jetty 1,125 feet long, protecting an entrance channel 100 feet wide, 20 feet deep, and 900 feet long, thence 15 feet deep for an additional 370 feet; an inner harbor channel 15 feet deep, 150 feet wide, and 800 feet long, thence 10 feet deep for an additional 600 feet, entering a turning basin 10 feet deep, 300 feet wide, and 207 feet long, and a sand bypassing plant. Approved estimated cost (1981) is $4,527,000, of which $2,995,000 is Federal cost (includes $35,000 Coast Guard costs) and $1,532,000 non-Federal cost (includes $1,420,000 cash contribution). Total estimated cost includes $2,662,000 for the completed portion. Existing project authorized by 1958 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 357, 85th Cong., 2d sess., as modified by Chief of Engineers). Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed jetties and channels. For details see Annual Report 1978. Terminal facilities. In the natural harbor there is one municipally owned wharf with facilities for fueling and servicing boats and receiving, handling, and processing fresh fish. The small-boat harbor includes a municipal pier, utilities, and berthing, marine repair, and supply facilities. These are considered adequate for existing commerce but local interests have developed harbor-expansion plans to provide an additional 500 berths to meet recreational boating needs. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design by hired labor and 43,325 cubic yards of shoaled material removed by contract from project channels, cost $443,831. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is about 80 percent complete. Jetties were completed in June 1963 and channel dredging in November 1963. Work remaining is provision for sand bypassing (continuation of construction involves construction of a fixed sand bypassing plant in lieu of the previous floating system (12-inch hydraulic dredge) which was unacceptable, and periodic harbor maintenance dredging. 18. SUISUN BAY CHANNEL, CALIF. Location. Suisun Bay is about 30 miles northeast of San Francisco, Calif., and is an integral part of waterways which provide access to the Pacific Ocean from inland ports of California. Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers flow to a junction and empty into Suisun Bay near Collinsville, and New York Slough, a distributary of San Joaquin River, which leads to head of Suisun Bay at Pittsburg, Calif. City of Sacramento is on Sacramento River about 60 miles north of Collinsville; access to city has been provided by 10-foot shallow-draft channel along river route. Sacramento River deep water ship channel, completed as an operating facility for oceangoing vessels in June 1963, provides deep-draft access to Sacramento. (For details see Improvement No. 1, Sacramento River, Calif. Sacramento District's Annual Report.) City of Stockton is on San Joaquin River about 40 miles above Pittsburg and access to city provided by Stockton deep water channel. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 5534.) 34-8 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIF., DISTRICT Previous project. For details, see Sacramento District's Annual Report page 1756 for year 1920, page 1562 for year 1926, and page 1714 for year 1928. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing acts, see Sacramento District's Annual Report for 1967. Total Federal cost of new work for existing project, completed in 1934, exclusive of work accomplished under public works program as part of San Joaquin River 30- foot project, was $142,027. No local interest costs were incurred (for details, see page 1741 of Sacramento District's Annual Report for 1962). Modification of existing project is included as one unit of San Francisco Bay to Stockton, Calif., (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels) authorized by 1965 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 208, 89th Congress, 1st sess.); this modification is reported in detail under Sacramento District, Improvement No. 2. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Along channel between western end of bay and mouth of New York Slough are three wharves, all privately owned. A naval magazine with wharves and warehouses was constructed at Port Chicago, on southern shore (mile 6). These facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Project maintenance responsibility to Point Edith was transferred from Sacramento District, January 1, 1974. Engineering and design including dredging surveys by hired labor and U.S. hopper dredge Harding removed 166,000 cubic yards of shoaled material from Bar and Entrance channel, cost $241,233. Condition at end of fiscal year. New work under existing project was initiated in June 1930 and completed in 1934; a portion of this work was accomplished under public works program. Portion of existing project authorized before public works program was completed in 1931 except for deepening 26-foot channel across Bulls Head Point to 30 feet; this portion was subsequently included in public works program. Work under public works program was accomplished during 1933 and 1934. Channel is navigable all year and provides access to San Francisco Bay and navigation channels of San Joaquin and Sacramento Rivers. Cost of existing project as of September 30, 1981, exclusive of work under public works program at a cost of $207,198 as a part of San Joaquin River 30-foot project, was $4,786,142 of which $142,027 was for new work and $4,644,115 for maintenance. (See table 34-A.) 19. PROTECTION OF NAVIGATION Removal of Sunken Vessels and Navigation Obstructions, under authority of Sections 19 and 20 of River and Harbor Act of 1899. Fiscal year costs for removal of sunken barge from Petaluma River, Calif., was $6,750. 20. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Reconnaissance and condition surveys of channels and harbor structures made throughout the fiscal year. No maintenance work was accomplished on Halfmoon Bay Harbor or Monterey Harbor projects during fiscal year. 21. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS See table 34-C. 22. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to section 107, Public Law 86-645 (preauthorization). Fiscal year costs for preauthorization studies were $128,921, of which $932 was for Belmont Marina Channel, San Mateo County, Calif., $5,000 for City of Marina, Monterey County, Calif., $13,378 for Humboldt Harbor (Fields Landing), Humboldt County, Calif., $2,769 for Petaluma Harbor, Sonoma County, Calif., and $106,842 for Pillar Point Marina, San Mateo County, Calif. Beach Erosion Control 23. OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS Humboldt Bay, Calif.-Inactive (see 1958 Annual Report for full details). Santa Cruz County, Calif. (see 1966 Annual Report for full details). Flood Control 24. ALHAMBRA CREEK, CALIF. Location. Creek drains an area of about 16.5 square miles and discharges into Carquinez Strait approximately 25 miles northeast of San Francisco, Calif. (See Geodetic Survey quadrangle Carquinez Strait.) Existing project. Provides for channel improvements from Carquinez Strait to Buckley Street in the city of Martinez, a diversion conduit under Alhambra Avenue from Buckley Street to junction of Alhambra Creek and Pleasant Hill Road West, channel improvements in the vicinity of Sheridan Lane and channel clearing to Wanda Way, about one-half mile upstream from Pleasant Hill Road West. Approved estimated cost for new work (1981) is $29,900,000, of which $26,700,000 is Federal cost and $3,200,000 non- Federal. Local cooperation. Local interests will be required to: (a) provide all lands, easements, and rights-of-way necessary for construction and operation of the project, including dredge disposal areas with required retaining dikes, bulkheads, and embankments for disposal areas; (b) provide all relocations and alterations of buildings, utilities, bridges (except railroad bridges) and roads, sewers, pipelines, and other alterations of existing improvements which may be required for construction of the project; (c) upon completion of construction, replace streets, pavements, drainage, and other vehicular traffic appurtenances, including sidewalks, curbs, gutters, and signs, and bear the cost of removal, replacement, and modification to sewer drains, utilities, or highways beyond the area required for excavation and construction of the project; (d) hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works; (e) maintain and operate all the works after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army; (f) prevent any encroachment on the flood-carrying capacity of 34-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 the improved channels and on the bypassed portions of the existing channels of Alhambra and Franklin Creeks which would serve as interior drainage features of the project, or if those channels are changed by local interests, provide without cost to the United States equivalent interior drainage facilities; and (g) adjust all claims regarding water rights that might be affected by the project. The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County by resolution 78-1 dated January 3, 1978 requested the initiation of Phase I Advance Engineering and Design studies. Subsequently, following the passage of Proposition 13, Contra Costa County withdrew support and the city of Martinez is now the project sponsor. In accordance with Section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970, a written agreement covering local cooperation for the project will be executed prior to initiation of construction. Operation and results during fiscal year. New work: Planning delayed due to completion of a special report of alternatives. These alternatives were presented to local interests in July 1981 to assess whether any of the proposed alternatives were acceptable to them. Local interests did not support the alternatives. Condition at end of fiscal year. Local interests did not support all proposed alternatives, therefore, the project is being recommended for reclassification to the inactive category. 25. PAJARO RIVER BASIN, CALIF. Location. Pajaro River and tributaries drain an area of 1,300 square miles in Coast Range and empty into Monterey Bay about 75 miles south of San Francisco. Pajaro Valley sub-basin in Santa Cruz and Monterey Counties includes 112 square miles in lower 13 miles of Pajaro River. (See U.S. Geological Survey quadrangles Capitola and San Juan Bautista.) Existing project. Provides for earthfill levees on Pajaro River and Corralitos Creek with suitable bank protection and raising, enlarging, and lengthening an existing levee on Carnadero Creek, a tributary of Pajaro River near the city of Gilroy (1944 act) and for modification and extension of existing levee system on lower 12.5 miles of Pajaro River and lower 4.5 miles of Corralitos and Salsipuedes Creeks. Approved estimated cost for new work (1981) is $3,780,000 (1944 act), of which $1,890,000 is Federal and $1,890,000 is non-Federal (excludes cost of previous project completed in 1949, Federal cost $748,283). Modification and extension of the existing levee system on Pajaro River and on Corralitos and Salsipuedes Creeks (1966) was placed in a deferred category in 1976 due to lack of local support. (See table 34-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for work performed. Requirements for Carnadero Creek levee under Act of December 22, 1944, have not been met. Act of November 7, 1966 requires local interests provide lands, rights-of-way, ponding, borrow, and spoil-disposal areas for construction; hold the United States free from damages; relocate pipelines, utilities, roads, bridges, and other facilities as necessary for construction; maintain and operate completed works; satisfy all claims concerning water rights arising from construction and operation of improvements; and prevent encroachment on constructed works and ponding areas and, if ponding areas are impaired, provide promptly, without cost to the United States, substitute storage or equivalent pumping capacity. Board of Supervisors of Monterey County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, by resolution adopted June 24, 1963, and Board of Directors of Pajaro Storm Drain Maintenance District of Santa Cruz County by Resolution 358-63 adopted June 24, 1963, provided assurances of required cooperation for modification authorized by 1966 Flood Control Act. Counties of Monterey and Santa Cruz and city of Watsonville have enacted necessary flood plain zoning ordinances. Monterey County renewed flood plain zoning indefinitely into the future on June 1, 1971. Reassurances pending resolution of local cost sharing. Operations and results during fiscal year. Planning for the recommended plan of improvement for construction of a variable setback levee beginning approximately 1,000 feet upstream of Miller Avenue and ending 2,000 feet below the Thomas Road Bridge on north side of Uvas Creek is about 65 percent complete (1944 Act). Advance engineering and design for work authorized by 1966 Flood Control Act was placed in a deferred category in 1976 due to lack of local support. Condition at end of fiscal year. Levees on Pajaro River to mile 11.8 and on Corralitos (Salsipuedes) Creek to mile 2.4 completed in January 1949. Work remaining is planning for levee modification and extension authorized by 1966 Flood Control Act which was about 52 percent complete when placed in a deferred category in 1976, and construction of a variable setback levee on the north side of Uvas Creek. 26. RUSSIAN RIVER BASIN, CALIF. Location. Russian River rises in Coast Range in northwestern California, flows southerly for 87 miles, and then turns westerly to flow for 23 miles to Pacific Ocean at Jenner, 60 miles northwest of San Francisco, Calif. (For general location see Geological Survey map for California.) Existing project. Active authorized project provides for construction of a dam on East Fork of Russian River at Coyote Valley to a height of 160 feet; a dam on Dry Creek at Warm Springs to a height of 319 feet; and channel stabilization works on Russian River between mouth and mile 98, on lower reaches of several tributaries, and on Dry Creek downstream from dam. Coyote Valley Dam (Lake Mendocino), completed in 1959, is operated and maintained by the United States. (See tables 34-B, 34-D, and 34-E, for authorizing legislation; latest approved estimated costs.) Knights Valley was deauthorized November 1977, under provision of PL 93-251. (See 1974 Annual Report for project details). Local cooperation. Fully complied with for Coyote Valley Dam and channel improvements accomplished to date. For the Dry Creek portion, local interests are required by the authorizing act to comply with the usual a., b., c. requirements for channel improvements and, in addition, prevent any encroachment in the channel of Dry Creek which would interfere with proper functioning of the channel improvement works; adjust all claims concerning water rights arising from the construction and operation of the improvements, including acquisition of water rights needed for preservation of fish and wildlife resources affected by the project; and reimburse the United States in accordance with the Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, for that part of the construction cost, (27.8% of total construction cost, currently estimated at $87,400,000) and the annual operation, maintenance and replacement costs allocated to municipal and industrial water supply, tentatively estimated at $315,000. The estimated annual cost to local interests for maintenance of channel improvement works is $56,000. Sonoma County Water Agency (formerly Sonoma County 34-10 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIF., DISTRICT Flood Control and Water Conservation District) provided assurances of willingness and ability to meet requirements by Resolutions No. DR 00793-1, September 25, 1961, No. DR 4770-1, December 17, 1962, and No. DR 45759, August 5, 1974, for Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and Channel. By letter dated March 7, 1967, Sonoma County Flood Control and Water Conservation District further indicated their interest in optimization of the Dry Creek (Warm Springs) damsite to provide additional water supply storage. A contract providing for reimbursement to the United States for Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and Channel costs allocated to 212,000 acre-feet of water supply storage is currently in negotiation. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Planning is underway for the relocation of Hot Springs Road, completing the lower portion of the boat launching ramps, which will be inundated by the reservoir, inclusion of incidental hydropower facilities within the control structure, determining effects of the reservoir upon the riparian habitat and the possible impacts of mitigation downstream from the damsite, and implementing the vegetation management program. Contract for construction of the Warm Springs Dam and appurtenances awarded May 1978, is 88 percent complete. Construction completions include fish hatchery in December 1980, reservoir clearing in July 1981, project overlook in May 1981, and downstream stabilization sills in October 1981. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance. Coyote Valley Dam, including recreation facilities, and condition and operation studies by hired labor. Condition at end of fiscal year. Entire project, exclusive of recreation facilities at completed project (Lake Mendocino), is about 67 percent complete. Coyote Valley Dam, initiated November 1958, was completed April 1959 (cost $17,550,000, of which $11,952,000 was Federal; and $5,598,000 contributed). Work, including removal of slides resulting from storms in 1958, was completed April 1959. Bank stabilization work on Russian River near Geyserville was completed in 1957 and channel improvements in remaining reaches on Russian River and East Fork of Russian River were completed in 1974 (cost $2,483,900). Work remaining is construction of Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and Channel and channel improvements on Dry Creek. Project is about 67 percent complete. 27. WALNUT CREEK, CALIF. Location. Project is on Walnut Creek and lower reaches of its principal tributaries, Pacheco, Grayson, San Ramon, Las Trampas, Galindo, and Pine Creeks in Contra Costa County, Calif. Improvement will extend from Suisun Bay to head of project about 1 mile above southern limits of city of Walnut Creek. City of Walnut Creek is about 10 miles south of Suisun Bay. (See Geological Survey quadrangles for area). Existing project. Comprises extension of existing levees, construction of new levees and concrete channels, channel rectification and enlargement, and utilization of improvements constructed or planned by local interests. Plan provides for about 21.8 miles of channel improvement, two reinforced-concrete drop structures, two stilling basins, and 13.8 miles of levees. Cost estimate (1981) is $103,300,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period), of which $78,600,000 is Federal cost and $24,700,000 is non-Federal cost (includes $18,400,000 for lands and damages and relocations except railroad facilities, and $6,300,000 required cash contribution for land enhancement benefits provided by the project). Local interests have also expended about $3 million for flood control in the project area during the period 1955-1965, including concrete conduits constructed through the city of Walnut Creek by local interests at an estimated cost of $1,000,000 considered a preproject condition to be incorporated in the Corps project and the cost thereof is not included in above costs of local cooperation. Improvement adopted by 1960 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 76, 86th Cong., 1st sess., contains latest published map). Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies, except that relocation of railroad facilities is a Federal responsibility. In addition, local interests must make a cash contribution to the United States, in amount of 7.4 percent of cost of construction for land enhancement benefits provided by project. Cash contribution is estimated (October 1981) at $6,300,000. Local interests are represented by Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District; formal assurances, including evidence of financial and legal ability to fulfill requirement for the cash contribution, were accepted by the Sacramento District Engineer on November 15, 1963. The Flood Control District furnished all rights-of-way required to date and indicated that it will furnish all requirements as needed for future construction. The Flood Control District will arrange for highway bridge modifications and utility relocations before start of work by the Corps contractor. Payment of required contributed funds will be made in installments in amounts equal to 7.4 percent of the estimated construction expenditure for each fiscal year. To date, $2,567,770 has been furnished. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design for the uncompleted portions of Walnut and San Ramon Creeks and all of Upper Pine Creek are continuing. The reach from the confluence of Lower Pine Creek and Walnut Creek completed October 1979 and Pine Creek existing concrete lining to Clayton Road extension completed January 1980. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was initiated June 1964; project is about 70 percent complete. Total of 13.1 miles of channel improvement, 9.2 miles of levee construction, part of channel improvement landscaping, and Drop Structures No. 1 and 2 have been transferred to local interests for operation and maintenance. Planning and design continued on remaining reaches.'Work remaining is channel improvement on lower Pine (Clayton Road to Bart) and Galindo Creeks (Detroit Avenue to San Miguel Road); Walnut Creek (SPRR bridge to Broadway Avenue) and Upper Pine Creek and San Ramon bypass (Ignacio Valley Road to Rudgear Road). 28. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, as amended and supplemented, included requirement that local interests maintain and operate completed flood control works in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of War. Inspections made throughout the year to determine effectiveness of operation and maintenance by local interests of completed local protection projects and works constructed under emergency and special authorities of Sections 205 and 208 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, and Public Law 99, 84th Congress. Fiscal year cost was $48,143. Total cost to September 30, 1981 was .$490,78(i. 34-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 29. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See Table 34-F. 30. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood Control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization). Fiscal year costs for preauthorization studies were $63,804, of which $36,800 was for Salinas River, Atascadero, San Luis Obispo County, Calif.; and $27,004 for Salinas River at Soledad, Monterey County, Calif. Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation). Fiscal year costs of $253,938 were incurred for emergency flood control activities, of which $103,967 was for disaster preparedness, $6,772 for emergency operations, and $143,199 for rehabilitation. Emergency bank protection (Section 14, 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Congress). Fiscal year costs were $135,603 for emergency bank protection of which $44,885 was for Boronda Road Bridge, Carmel River, Monterey County, Calif., $63,289 for Shulte Road Bridge, Carmel River, Monterey County, Calif., and $27,429 for Sewage Treatment Plant, Mad River at Blue Lake, County, Calif. General Investigations 31. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs for surveys from regular funds were $1,317,085, of which $857,685 was for navigation; $391,421 for flood damage prevention and $67,979 for shoreline protection surveys. 32. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Fiscal year costs of $62,712, were incurred for flood plain management service program. 33. COORDINATION WITH OTHER AGENCIES Fiscal year costs of $11,773 were incurred for coordination with Soil Conservation Service and Bureau of Reclamation. 34. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT Fiscal year costs of $7,680 were incurred for hydrologic studies. 34-12 TABLE 34-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Project Funding FY 78 FY 79 1. Bodega Bay, Calif. New Work Approp. 1,300 25,000 Cost 2,518 10,571 Maint. Approp. 39,000 Cost - 38,960 Major rehab. Approp. - - Cost - - 2. Crescent City Harbor, New Work Calif. Approp. - 250,000 Cost - 212,473 Maint. Approp. - 50,000 Cost 49,253 Major rehab. Approp. - - Cost - - 3. Humboldt Harbor New Work and Bay, Calif. Approp. 3,500,000 Cost 3,498,570 , 302,678 Maint. Approp. 558,000 1,113,000 Cost 519,546 1,145,574 4. Moss Landing New Work Harbor, Calif. Approp. - - Cost - - Maint. Approp. 394,600 7,000 Cost 291,136 110,464 5. Napa River, New Work Calif. Approp. - - Cost - - Maint. Approp. 24,956 57,496 Cost 24,956 57,423 6. Noyo River and New Work Harbor, Calif. Approp. - 115,000 Cost - 72,445 Maint. Approp. 297,500. 405,000 Cost 289,700 412,620 Minor rehab. Approp. - - Cost - - 7. Oakland Harbor, New Work Calif. Approp. - - Cost - - Maint. Approp. 630,500 779,000 Cost 630,899 778,966 8. Petaluma River, New Work Calif. Approp. - - Cost - - Maint. Approp. 10,000 25,000 Cost 45,534 24,951 9. Redwood City New Work Harbor, Calif. Approp. - - Cost - - Maint. Approp. 9,400 Cost 9,400 10. Richmond Harbor, New Work Calif. Approp. - Cost - - Total Cost to FY 80 FY 81 Sept 30, 1981 106,000 25,000 1,097,7651 108,674 33,471 1,094,0811 260,000 153,000 777,1832 259,627 153,414 777,1832 - - 397,7793 - - 397,7793 120,000 100,000 7,626,9724 113,944 138,763 7,622,1514 2,095,000 264,000 7,061,6745 2,095,700 255,228 7,052,8555 - - 525,0006 - - 525,0006 87,223 - 9,847,2997 202,312 - 9,847,2997 710,600 1,636,000 31,430,6728 379,11 1 1,653,268 31,410,2968 - - 338,2159 - - 338,2159 5,000 341,000 3,005,63110 4,731 74,622 2,738,9.8510 - - 1,021,27411 - - 1,021,27411 79,500 885,000 1,603,80911 12 69,655 293,412 1,002,30411 12 240,000 145,000 963,48213 270,930 124,347 931,20413 240,000 246,000 3,614,75414 15 239,292 239,864 3,607,73114 1 - - 222,81016 - - 222,81016 - - 9,646,984' - - 9,646,98417 1,206,000 469,000 22,035,2731' 1,205,305 439,711 22,005,23518 - - 297,146' - - 297,14618 508,000 358,000 4,700,1592" 392,086 467,773 4,693,96921 S_ 1,672,7222 ' S_ 1,672,7222' 20,000 1,199,000 4,700,32522 19,717 1,042,130 4,543,17222 _ _ 2,886,695: 2' _ _ 2,886,6952:' 2 34-13 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 34-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 Sept 30, 1981 Maint Approp. 750,000 Cost 750,336 Minor rehab. Approp. - Cost - 11. San Francisco Bay New Work to Stockton, Calif. Approp. 1,075,000 (John F. Baldwin and Cost 369,532 Stockton Ship Channels) 12. San Francisco Bay New Work and Delta Model, Calif. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. 975,000 Cost 939,734 13. San Francisco Harbor, Calif. New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. 820,000 Cost 818,075 14. San Francisco New Work Harbor and Bay (Calif.) Approp. (Removal of Drift) Cost - Maint. Approp. 985,000 Cost 1,122,979 15. San Pablo Bay New Work and Mare Island Approp. - Strait, Calif. Cost - Maint. Approp. 943,100 Cost 941,373 16. San Rafael Creek, New Work Calif. Approp. - Cost - Maint. Approp. 248,000 Cost 563,000 17. Santa Cruz New Work Harbor, Calif. Approp. - (Federal Funds) Cost - (Contrib. Funds) New Work Contrib. - Cost - Maint. Approp. 698,900 Cost 848,572 18. Suisun Bay Channel, New Work Calif. Approp. - Cost - Maint. Approp. 127,500 Cost 127,500 24. Alhambra Creek, New Work Calif. Approp. - Cost - Maint. Approp. Cost 25. Pajaro River Basin, New Work Calif. Approp. - Cost - 817,352 542,000 605,000 9,189,11625 815,292 542,463 601,144 9,183,46325 - - - 164,689 - - - 164,689 - 410,000 665,000 6,310,200 671,407 404,541 434,944 6,019,755 2,628,000 1,685,000 736,000 7,187,700 2,356,599 1,965,818 618,490 7,030,202 - - - 2,689,35624 26 - - - 2,689,35624 25 830,000 751,000 47,700 14,874,96027 831,524 750,834 41,709 !4,864,79327 1,255,000 1,260,000 1,324,000 15,645,182 1,304,726 1,257,633 1,257,564 15,560,375 - - - 1,369,37224 29 - - - 1,369,37224 25 856,800 1,015,000 1,132,300 20,563,43329 858,412 1,012,515 1,034,491 20,463,02429 - - - 32,359:" - - - 32,359 - 182,000 264,000 1,981,902 - 80,951 365,049 1,981,902:4 - - - 1,852,340 - - - 1,852,340 - - - 160,00032 - - - 160,0002 450,000 530,000 675,000 5,650,159 471,440 529,983 503,639 5,478,731 - - - - :3 194,000 320,000 297,000 1,396,338,: 34 193,965 318,963 297,632 1,395,898 :34 200,000 100,000 - 300,000 193,014 96,683 10,303 300,000 125,000 135,000 - 1,949,968: , 112,986 62,627 67,159 1,932,740:' ' 34-14 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIF., DISTRICT TABLE 34-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 Sept 30, 1981 26. Russian River Basin, New Work Calif. Approp. - - - - 14,435,869 37 Coyote Valley Dam Cost - - - - 14,435,86936 37 (Lake Mendocino) and Maint. Channel Improvements Approp. 1,188,000 1,558,000 1,744,000 1,829,000 14,081,61638 Cost 1,167,100 1,618,069 1,334,220 2,056,798 13,856,79439 Dry Creek (Warm New Work Springs) Lake and Approp. 20,175,000 57,775,000 43,930,000 34,400,000 205,886,645 Channel Improvements Cost 23,678,483 58,389,782 39,841,016 38,001,042 204,878,996 Calif. 27. Walnut Creek, Calif. New Work (Federal Funds) Approp. -200,000 1,550,000 1,000,000 5,045,000 26,226,43040 Cost 999,867 1,557,855 1,115,815 4,454,990 25,548,37740 (Required Contributed New Work Funds) Contrib. 36,100 156,020 - 915,000 2,567,77041 Cost 60,278 53,115 123,572 22,194 1,648,84241 (Contributed Funds, New Work Other) Contrib. 112,969 82,327 31,700 285,940 1,473,78542 Cost 80,359 40,452 73,375 29,080 1,184,11442 1. Includes $641,800 for jetties, bulkheads, main Bodega Bay Channel and turning basin completed in 1943. 2. Includes $66,533 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1981. 3. Excludes contributed funds of $2,000. 4. Excludes contributed funds of $217,116 and $2,138 surplus material from Corps military activities. 5. Excludes contributed funds of $44,340. Includes $61,031 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956- 1981. 6. Excludes $2,000 contributed funds in lieu of royaltyfree rock. 7. Includes $2,261,371 for previous project. Excludes $95,000 contributed funds for existing project. 8. Includes $98,206 for previous project and $1,641 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1981. 9. Excludes previous project costs. 10. Excludes $8,539 surplus material from Corps' military activities. Includes $43,112 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1981. 11. Excludes previous project costs. 12. Includes $203,684 for reconnaissance and condition surveys FY 1956-1981. 13. Includes $11,985 for previous project. Excludes $7,180 contributed funds for previous project. 14. Includes $32,097 for previous project and $15,436 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1981. Excludes contributed funds of $820 for previous project. 15. Excludes contributed funds of $4,000 in lieu of providing dike disposal areas on existing project. 16. Excludes contributed funds of $1,700. 17. Includes $2,899,232 for previous projects. Excludes $397,266 contributed funds on existing project. 18. Includes $684,028 for previous projects and $501 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1981. 19. Includes $212,083 for previous project. Excludes contributed funds of $15,559 for previous project. 20. Includes $314,692 for previous project and $75,909 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1981. 21. Includes previous project costs $31,443. Excludes $119,572 contributed funds for existing project. 22. Includes $67,759 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1981. 23. Excludes contributed funds of $524,778. Includes $105,000 Public Works Administration funds. 24. Excludes modification authorized October 27, 1965, under project "San Francisco Bay to Stockton, Calif. (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels)." 25. Excludes $34,800 contributed funds. Includes $3,138 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1981. 26. Includes $1,030,399 for previous projects. Excludes $134,591 contributed funds for existing project. 27. Includes $475,321 for previous projects and $5,234 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1981. 28. Includes $1,086,703 for previous projects. 29. Includes $1,359,380 for previous projects and $904 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1981. 30. Excludes $41,094 contributed funds. 31. Includes $81,455 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1981. 32. Excludes $810,046 contributed funds. 33. See Sacramento District FY 1974 Annual Report for details. 34. Project maintenance responsibility to Point Edith was transferred to San Francisco District January 1, 1974. Excludes Sacramento District's portion. Includes $8,588 for reconnaissance and project condition surveys, FY 1976-1981. 35. Includes $748,283 for previous project (1944 act) and $941,685 for (1966 act) which was placed in a deferred category in 1976. 36. Excludes $5,598,000 contributed funds and $400,000 for recreation facilities at completed projects funded under Public Work Acceleration Program. 37. Excludes $1,628,411 for recreation facilities at completed projects funded under Code 711. 38. Excludes $215,400 recreation user fee funds. 39. Excludes $215,240 recreation user fee costs. 40. Construction responsibility was transferred to San Francisco District January 31, 1977. Responsibility for operation and maintenance of all completed works remain with Sacramento District. 41. For land enhancement benefits provided by project. 42. Miscellaneous construction and engineering and design services to be accomplished at expense of local interests under local cooperation requirements in connection with acquisition of rights-of-way and utility alterations. 34-15 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 34-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Oct. 22, 1976 June 23, 1874 June 25, 1910 Modifies the 1962 Act to construct such breakwaters as may be needed to provide necessary protection, but not more than two, and to construct such additional channel improvements, including, but not limited to, deepening, widening, and extensions, as necessary to meet applicable economic and environmental criteria. OAKLAND HARBOR, CALIF. (See Section 7 of Text) Jetties. North channel in Brooklyn Basin, 25 feet deep, and tidal canal to 18 feet. 2nd sess. Sec. 146, 1976 WRDA Acts Work Authorized Documents CRESCENT CITY HARBOR, CALIF. (See Section 2 of Text) .July 18. 1918 Breakwater H. Doc. 434, 64th Cong., 1st sess. Sept. 22. 1922 Conditions of local cooperation modified. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 4, 67th Cong., 2nd sess. Jan. 21. 1927 Extend breakwater to 3,00() feet long. H. Doc. 595, 69th Cong., 2nd sess. Aug. 30. 1935 Dredge harbor basin, 1,800 feet long, 1,400 feet Rivers and Harbors Committee wide, and 20 feet deep. Doc. 40, 74th Cong., 1st sess. Aug. 26. 1937 Sand barrier and maintenance dredging in vicinity of S. Commerce Committee print, seaward end thereof. 75th Cong., 1st sess. Mar. 2. 1945 Extend breakwater to Round Rock (modified by H. Doc 688, 76th Cong., Chief of Engineers). 3rd sess. Mar. 2, 1945 Inner breakwater and removal of rock in inner harbor. Report on file in Office, Chief of Engineers. ()ct. 27. 1965 Extend inner breakwater 400 feet and dredge T-shaped H. Doc. 264, 89th Cong.' basin 20 feet deep. HUMBOLDT HARBOR AND BAY, CALIF. (See Section 3 of Text) .June 25, 191() Rebuilding the jetties. H. Doc. 950, 60th Cong., 1st sess. .July 3. 193(0 Depth of 20 feet and widths of 250 and 300 feet in bay H. Doc. 755, 69th Cong., channels and for channel to Arcata Wharf. 2nd sess. Aug. 30. 1935 Entrance channel, 500 feet wide, 30 feet deep. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 14, 74th Cong., 1st sess. Aug. 26. 1937 Widths of 400 feet in Eureka Channel and 300 feet in Rivers and Harbors Committee Samoa and Fields Landing Channels, and construct Fields Doec. 11, 75th Cong., 1st sess. Landing Turning Basin, 600 feet wide and 800 feet long, all to a depth of 26 feet. .July 16, 1952 Deepen to 40 feet and widen bar and entrance channel; H. Doc. 143, 82nd Cong., deepen Eureka and Samoa Channels to 30 feet; and 1st sess. construct North Bay Channel, 400 feet wide, 30 feet deep. Aug. 13, 1968 Deepen to 35 feet North Bay and Samoa Channels and outer H. Doc. 330, 90th Cong., reach of Eureka Channel (miles 4.29 to 5.00); widen bends, 2nd sess.' miles 0.75 and 2.6; and construct North Bay anchorage area 35 feet deep. NAPA RIVER, CALIF. (See Section 5 of Text) Aug. 30, 1935 Channel 8 feet deep, 100 feet wide from Mare Island Rivers and Harbors Committee Strait to Asylum Slough, thence 75 feet wide to Napa. Doc. 6, 72d Cong. 1st sess. .July 24. 1946 Channel 15 feet deep, 100 feet wide between Mare H. Doc. 397, 79th Cong, 2d sess.' Island Strait and Asylum Slough, thence 10 feet deep, 75 feet wide to 3d St. in Napa. NOYO RIVER AND HARBOR, CALIF. (See Section 6 of Text) .July 3, 1930 Entrance channel, jetties, and channel in river. S. Doc. 156, 71st Cong., 2nd sess. Mar. 2. 1945 South breakwater in Noyo Harbor.3 H. Doc. 682, 76th Cong., 3rd sess. July 14., 1960 Mooring basin in lieu of channel extension authorized by H. Doc. 289, 86th Cong., Act of June 30, 1948. 4 2nd sess. Oct. 23, 1962 North Breakwater in Noyo Harbor. S. Doc. 121, 87th Cong., Annual Report, Part II, 1874, p. 378. H. Doc. 647, 61st Cong., 2nd sess. 34-16 2 TABLE 34-B (Cont'd) SAN FRANCISCO, CALIF., DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Sept. 22, 1922 Jan. 21, 1927, Apr. 28, 1928 July 3, 1930 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Oct. 23, 19626 June 25, 1910 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 May 17, 1950 Aug. 8, 1917 July 3, 193() Aug. 30, 19357 June 20, 1938 Mar. 2, 1945 Sept. 3, 1954 SAN FRANCISCO HARBOR, CALIF. (See Section 13 of Text) Dredging at Islais Creek. H. Doc. 337, 69th Cong., 1st sess. 34-17 Jan. 21, 1927 Work Authorized Channel across shoal southeast of Yerba Buena Island and thence to Webster St.; South channel in Brooklyn Basin; Turning Basin at east end of Brooklyn Basin; and channel in Tidal Canal from Brooklyn Basin to Park St., 30 feet deep. Channel from Webster St. to Brooklyn Basin, maintain area to within 75 feet of pierhead line south of channel from Harrison St. to Harbor Line Point 119 in Brooklyn Basin; dredge a triangular strip about 2,700 feet long and maximum width of 300 feet at western end of Brooklyn Basin, 30 feet deep. Local cooperation requirements modified to provide alteration or replacement of bridges by local interests shall apply only to that feature of project covering deepening tidal canal to 25 feet. Drawbridges across Tidal Canal were required by 1882 Decree of Court in condemnation proceedings whereby title was obtained to right-of-way for tidal canal. Entrance channel to outer harbor, 800 to 600 feet wide. Eliminated requirement that local interests contribute 10 cents per cubic yard toward deepening tidal canal. Maintenance of 35-foot depth in channel to outer harbor and in outer harbor channel and turning basin. Deepen inner harbor 35-foot channels and lower 1,300 feet of north channel in Brooklyn Basin to 35 feet. REDWOOD CITY HARBOR, CALIF. (See Section 9 of Text) A 5-foot channel to Steinberger Slough. A 20-foot channel to West Point Slough. A 27-foot channel to West Point Slough and a turning basin 27 feet deep, 1,800 feet long, and 700 feet wide. A 30-foot channel across San Bruno Shoal and enlarge and deepen 27-foot channel and turning basin in Redwood Creek to 30 feet. Extend 30-foot channel 1,300 feet upstream and provide a second turning basin 30 feet deep, 900 feet wide, and 1,700 feet long at junction of Redwood Creek, Calif., to Redwood City Harbor, Calif. RICHMOND HARBOR, CALIF. (See Section 10 of Text) Channel 24 feet deep and 600 feet wide from San Francisco Bay to Ellis Slough (Santa Fe Channel); a turning basin at Point Potrero; a training wall. A 30-foot channel with lessened widths; a turning basin at head of navigation. Increase project widths in inner harbor, maintenance of Santa Fe channel to 30 feet; approach areas in outer harbor to 32 feet. Widen channel at Point Potrero and north thereof; enlarge and maintain to 30-foot depth turning basin at Terminal No. 1. Channel 20 feet deep, 150 feet wide, in San Pablo Bay north of Point San Pablo. Channel 35 feet deep and 600 feet wide adjacent to Southampton Shoal; enlarge and deepen to 35 feet approach area to Richmond Long Wharf; widen and deepen inner harbor and entrance channels; deepen turning basin at Point Richmond and southerly 2,000 feet of Santa Fe Channel. Eliminate restriction that widening north of Point Potrero will not be undertaken until local interests furnish assurances industries will avail themselves of improved navigation facilities. Documents H. Doc. 144, 67th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 407, 69th Cong., 1st sess.' Public Res. 28, 70th Cong. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 43, 71st Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 466, 77th Cong., 1st sess. Report on File in Office, Chief of Engineers. H. Doc. 353, 87th Cong., 2nd sess.' H. Doc. 307, 61st Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 142, 70th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 10, 73rd Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 94, 79th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 104, 81st Cong., 1st sess.) H. Doc. 515, 63rd Cong., 2nd sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 16, 70th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Does. 7, 73rd Cong., 1st sess, and 10, 74th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 598, 75th Cong., 3rd sess. H. Doc. 715, 76th Cong., 3rd sess. H. Doc. 395, 83rd Cong., 2nd sess.i REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 34-B (Cont'd) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized I)ocuments Remove Presidio Shoal, Rincon Reef Rock (Inner), Rincon H. Doc. 196, 70th Cong., Reef Rock (Outer), Blossom Rock, and Alcatraz Shoal 1st sess. to 40 feet deep, mean lower low water; remove Arch Rock, Shag Rocks 1 and 2, and Harding Rock to 35 feet deep; remove Racoon Shoal and Point Knox Shoal westward of a north-and-south line through Point Stuart Light to 35 feet deep; for a bar main ship channel 45 feet deep and 2,000 feet wide. A 50-foot depth in bar main ship channel, 2,000 feet Rivers and Harbors Committee wide, remove Black Point Shoal to 40 feet deep and certain Doc. 50, 72nd Cong., 2nd sess. modifications of areas to be deepened on Alcatraz and Islais Creek Shoals and abandon 34-foot depth area south of flared approach channel to Islais Creek. Channel to San Francisco Airport 750 feet wide and 10 feet Rivers and Harbors Committee deep ending in a basin 2,000 feet wide. Doc. 12, 75th Cong., 1st sess.' SAN PABLO BAY AND MARE ISLAND STRAIT, CALIF. (See Section 15 of Text) Pinole Shoal Channel 35 feet deep, 600 feet wide, 7.6 miles H. Doc. 104, 69th Cong., long; Mare Island Strait channel 30 feet deep, 600 feet 1st sess. wide with turning basin 1,000 feet wide. Increase width of channel in Mare Island Strait to 700 feet H. Doc. 644, 75th Cong., and increase length of turning basin. 3rd sess. Maintain approach areas to Navy Yard Piers at south end H. Doc. 217, 77th Cong., of Mare Island. 1st sess.' 8 July 3, 19 ) Aug. i0, 19:35 Aug. 2(. 1987) .Jan. 21, 1927 June 20, 1938 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1919 Aug. 13, 1968 Dec. 22, 1944 Nov. 7, 1966 May 17, 1950 Feb. 10, 1956 Oct. 23, 1962 Mar. 7, 1974 H. Doc. 801, 63rd Cong., 2nd sess. (no map published). H. Doc. 336, 90th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 505, 78th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 491, 89th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 585, 81st Cong., 2nd sess. Public Law 404, 84th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 547, 87th Cong., 2nd sess. Sec. 95, 1974 WRDA 1. Contains latest published map. 2. Included dikes and revetments if required which is to be restudied. 3. Inactive. Requires determination by Area Redevelopment Administration that improvement is essential to its program for redeveloping the area. 4. A 400-foot channel extension, mooring basin and connecting channel constructed by Noyo Harbor District. The channel extension to be maintained by the Federal Government. 5. Included deepening of tidal canal above Park Street Bridge to 25 feet, which was deauthorized November 6, 1977. 6. Reconstruction of Fruitvale Avenue Highway Bridge (S. Doc. 75, 87th Cong., 2d sess.) which was deauthorized November 6, 1977. 7. Included in part in Public Works Administration Program, September 6, 1933. 8. Included dredging two approach areas at Vallejo and South Vallejo, which was deauthorized November 6, 1977. 34-18 Acts SAN RAFAEL CREEK, CALIF. (See Section 16 of Text) An 8-foot channel across flats in San Francisco Bay; a 6-foot channel in creek; a turning basin. ALHAMBRA CREEK, CALIF. (See Section 24 of Text) Flood control channel and conduit, about 4 miles. PAJARO RIVER BASIN, CALIF. (See Section 25 of Text) Earthfill levees on Pajaro River and Corralitos Creek, with suitable bank protection, and raising, enlarging, and lengthening on existing levee on Carnadero Creek. Levee modification and extension, Pajaro River mouth to mile 12.5 Corralitos (Salsepuedes) Creek to mile 4.5. RUSSIAN RIVER BASIN, CALIF. (See Section 26 of Text) Coyote Valley Dam (Lake Mendocino): Channel improvements on lower 98 miles of Russian River and lower reaches of tributaries. Increased appropriation authorization for initial stage of project development. Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake; Channel Improvements on Dry Creek below dam. Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and channel; compensate for fish losses on the Russian River which may be attributed to the operation of the Coyote Dam component of the project through measures such as possible expansion of the capacity of the fish hatchery at the Warm Springs Dam component of the project. SAN FRANCISCO, CALIF., DISTRICT TABLE 34-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Section 21 of Text) For Last Cost To Sept 30, 1981 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Berkeley Harbor, Calif.' 1966 155,5502 Berkeley Marina, Calif.' 1979 505,2015 Halfmoon Bay Harbor, Calif.3 1979 6,697,3964 Lower San Francisco Bay, Calif. (Inactive) 1935 Monterey Harbor, Calif. (Inactive) 1971 1,108,1826 83,0097 San Francisco Marina (Gas House Cove), Calif.' 1974 180,4728 San Francisco Harbor (Islais Creek), Calif.' 1976 848,2279 San Leandro Marina (Breakwater), Calif.' 1976 210,39010 San Leandro Marina, Calif. 1977 - 626,116" Suisun Channel, Calif. 1972 217,67712 806,75812 ' : 1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Sec. 107, Public 9. Includes $94,550 preauthorization costs. Law 86-645). "Completed." 10. Includes $72,000 preauthorization costs and excludes 2. Excludes $155,551 contributed funds. contributed funds $138,189. 3. "Completed." 11. Authorized by FC Act of 1965 (Sec. 201); Maintenance 4. Excludes $100,000 contributed funds and $105,000 R&H Act of 1970 (Sec. 103). Includes $24,116 for reconnaiscontributed in lieu of royalty-free rock. sance and condition surveys FY 1979-1981. 5. Excludes $378,989 contributed funds. 12. Project maintenance assigned to San Francisco 6. Includes $207,800 Public Works Administration District from Sacramento District January 1, 1974. See funds and breakwater modifications (1960 Act) placed Sacramento District 1972 Annual Report for full report. inactive 1974. 13. Includes $28,442 for reconnaissance and condition 7. Includes $5,170 for reconnaissance and condition surveys FY 1978-1981. surveys for FY 1956-1981. 8. Includes preauthorization costs $26,855 and excludes contributed funds $153,618. TABLE 34-D RUSSIAN RIVER BASIN, CALIF.: ESTIMATED COST FOR NEW WORK (See Section 26 of Text) Estimated Cost Non-Federal Project Feature Federal Contribution Total Coyote Valley Dam (Lake Mendocino); Channel Improvements Below Dam on Lower 98 Miles of Russian River $ 14,436,000 $ 5,598,000 $ 20,034,000' Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake; Channel Improvements Below Dam 227,600,000 87,400,0002 315,000,000 Total $242,036,000 $92,998,000 $335,034,000 1. Exclusive of $1,628,000 for recreation facilities at over a period not to exceed 50 years after use of storage is completed projects. initiated and exclusive of lands and damages. 2. Reimbursement by local interests to Federal Government for costs allocated to water supply storage to be paid 34-19 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 34-E RUSSIAN RIVER BASIN, CALIF.: PROJECT FEATURES AND ESTIMATED COSTS (See Section 26 of Text) Height of Reservoir Nearest City Distance Dam and Capacity Estimated Name (California) Above Mouth Type (Acre-Ft) Cost Coyote Valley Dam (Lake Ukiah Mile 0.8-East Fork 160 Feet-Earthfill 122,500 $ 17,550,0001 Mendocino) of Russian River Channel Improvement (East Fork Ukiah Mile 0 to 0.8 East - - 2,484,000 Fork Below Coyote Valley Dam and Guerneville Mile 0 to 98, Russian - Lower 98 Miles of Russian River) River Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake Healdsburg Mile 14.4 Dry Creek 319 Feet-Earthfill 381,000 312,270,000 Channel Improvement (Dry Creek) Healdsburg Mile 1 to 14.4 Dry - - 2,730,000 Below Dry Creek (Warm Springs Creek Dam) 1. Exclusive of $1,628,000 for recreation facilities at completed projects. TABLE 34-F OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 29 of Text) For Last Cost to Sept 30, 1981 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Alameda Creek, Calif. 1978 26,995,350 46,1631 Corte Madera Creek, Calif. 1979 6,999,7253 Coyote Creek, Calif.2 1968 705,622 East Weaver Creek, Calif.2 1965 220,6364 Eel River, Calif. (Inactive) 1971 1,272,8165 Klamath River, Calif.8 1972 4,838,000 Mad River Basin, Calif. (Inactive)6 1973 4,243,7506 Napa River Basin, Calif. (Inactive)6 1979 2,639,955 Pajaro River, Calif. 7 1974 941,6857 Pinole Creek, Calif.2 1968 885,750 Redwood Creek, Humboldt County, Calif.7 1970 4,620,0709 Rheem Creek, Calif.2 1962 400,00010 Rodeo Creek, Calif.2 1966 974,100 Salinas River, Calif." 1952 94,213 San Leandro Creek, Calif.8 1973 1,000,00012 San Lorenzo Creek, Calif.8 1962 5,130,82113 - San Lorenzo River, Calif.8 1966 4,314,40614 Sonoma Creek, Calif. (Inactive) 1 1973 781,500 Wildcat and San Pablo Creeks, Calif. 1979 1,110,000 1. Scheduling of reservoir operations costs. 2. Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Sec. 205, Public Law 86-645). Completed. 3. Excludes $97,400 contributed funds. 4. Includes $174,938 Public Works Acceleration Program Funds. 5. Excludes $194,821 contributed funds and placed inactive 1973. 6. Placed inactive 1974. Excludes $225,000 applicable to Public Works Acceleration Program and $162,761 previous project, Blue Lake levee. 7. Project deferred due to lack of local cooperation. Excludes $748,283 previous project. 8. Completed. 9. Completed. Includes $107,000 costs for remedial work to drainage system completed in FY 1977. 10. Excludes $52,549 contributed funds. 11. Improvement inactive. Cost includes engineering and design prior to June 30, 1952 and costs of $4,288 FY 1962 and 1963 to determine if project classification to an active category was justified. 12. Excludes $285,329 contributed funds. 13. Excludes $200,000 estimated value of work performed in lieu of cash contribution. 14. Excludes $421,182 contributed funds. 15. Placed inactive 1974. 34-2() SACRAMENTO, CALIF., DISTRICT* This district comprises basins of Suisun Bay and San Joaquin and Sacramento Rivers in California; Goose Lake in Oregon; basins of the Great Salt Lake and Sevier Lake in Utah; an intervening portion of Great Basin in northern Nevada, northern California, and southeastern Idaho; and the upper Colorado River basin, which is in southwestern Wyoming, eastern Utah, northeastern Arizona, northwestern New Mexico, and western Colorado, west of the Continental Divide. IMPROVEMENTS Nav igation Page 1. Sacramento River, Calif. ..................... 35-2 2. San Francisco Bay to Stockton, Calif. (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels) ....................... 35-2 3. San Joaquin River, Calif ....................... 35-3 4. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys................................. 35-3 5. Other authorized navigation projects .................................... 35-3 Flood Control Buchanan Dam-H. V. Eastman Lake, Chowchilla River, Calif. ................. 35-3 Calaveras River and Littlejohn Creek and tributaries, including New Hogan Lake and Farmington Dam, Calif ................................. 35-4 Chester, Calif ................................ 35-5 Cottonwood Creek, Calif. ....................... 35-5 Hidden Dam-Hensley Lake, Fresno River, Calif ..... ........................ 35-6 Humboldt River and Tributaries, Nev............................................ 35-6 Isabella Lake, Kern River, Calif............... 35-7 Kaweah and Tule Rivers, including Terminus Dam and Success Lake, Calif ....................................... 35-7 Lake Oroville, Calif.............. .......... 35-8 Martis Creek Lake, Martis Creek, Nev. and Calif ............................. 35-9 Merced County Stream Group, Calif. .............. ....................... 35-9 Flood Control (Cont'd) Page 17. Merced County Streams, Calif .................. 35-9 18. Pine Flat Lake and Kings River, Calif ........................................ 35-10 19. Sacramento River and tributaries, Calif., from Collinsville to Shasta Dam ........................................... 35-11 2(0. Inspection of completed flood control projects.................. ............. 35-12 21. Scheduling flood control reservoir operations .................. ............. 35-13 22. Other authorized flood control projects ........................................ 35-13 23. Flood control work under special authorization ................. ................ 35-13 Multiple-l~'r rpose Projec(ts ic(l udiny Power 21. New Melones Lake, Calif. ..................... 35-13 Generol In vest igations 25. Surveys .................................... 35-14 26. Morrison Creek Stream Group, Calif. Phase I, Feasibility Study .......................................... 35-14 27. Collection and study of basic data............... 35-14 28. Research and development....................... 35-15 National EnPergency Planning 29. Mobilization Program ......................... 13-15 *All cost and financial statements are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and the end of this chapter. 35-1 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13i. 14. 15. 16. REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 Navigation 1. SACRAMENTO RIVER, CALIF. Location. Rises in Trinity Mountains in north-central California, flows generally southerly about 374 miles and empties into Suisun Bay, an arm of San Francisco Bay, at Collinsville, Calif. (See Geological Survey topographic map of Sacramento Valley, Calif.) Previous projects. For details see page 1985 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1708 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description of Sacramento Deep Water Ship Channel, see Annual Report for 1969. Total first cost for completed portion was $43,932,558 ($39,560,558 Federal (Corps), $300,000 (Coast Guard), and $4,072,000 non- Federal for lands and damages, including relocations) and excludes local interests cost $10,741,000 (June 1963) for 30- foot deep water ship channel and 13-foot deep connecting canal basic terminal facilities required under terms of project authorization. Project also provides for a shallowdraft channel 10 feet deep at mean lower low water 150 to 200 feet bottom width, from Suisun Bay to Sacramento, Calif., 60 miles; a depth of 6 feet at low water between Sacramento and Colusa, 85 miles; a depth of 5 feet at low water between Colusa and Chico Landing, 50 miles; and such depths as practicable between Chico Landing and Red Bluff, 53 miles, a total distance of 248 miles. Estimated Federal cost (July 1973 of new work for shallow-draft river channel is $1,360,000 (includes $1,163,000 for deferred portion between Colusa and Chico Landing). (See table 35-B for authorizing legislation.) (See table 35-C on tidal and flood conditions prevailing.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for deep water ship channel project. None required on shallow-draft feature. Terminal facilities. Piers, wharves, and docks at Port of, Sacramento for shallow-draft navigation are open-pile structures with timber decks, some of which are designed to meet extreme high waters of flood stages. All main wharves at Sacramento have rail connections. Three of above facilities are owned by city of Sacramento and remainder by private interests; all are privately operated. For full description see "Port and Terminal Facilities at the Ports of Sacramento, Stockton, Pittsburg and Antioch, Calif., 1975." Deep water terminal facilities comprise wharves and piers, administration and storage buildings, and belt railroad facilities. Majority of these facilities are owned and operated by Sacramento-Yolo Port District; remainder are privately owned and operated. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work, Deep Water Ship Channel: None. Maintenance: Shallow Draft Channel: Minor maintenance and operation activities continued in Sacramento River, Sacramento upstream to Colusa. Deep Water Ship Channel: Maintenance and operation activities continued. Fiscal year costs for major maintenance items consisted of: Cathodic protection at lock initiated by contract, $282,462; maintenance dredging on Sacramento River, Mile 33.3 to Mile 42.0 by suction dredge initiated by contract, $2,246,071; and stone protection on levee initiated by contract, $391,671. Maintenance dredging contract for Sacramento River, Mile 4.5 to Mile 13.5 was awarded August 31, 1981. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of 7-foot shallow-draft channel below Sacramento was initiated in September 1899 and completed in 1904. Modified 10-foot shallow-draft channel up to Sacramento was initiated in fiscal year 1928 and completed in 1931. Shallow-draft channel above Sacramento was begun in April 1946 but new work was discontinued when about 48 percent complete. In February 1974, remaining work for shallow-draft portion of project, provision of a 5-foot depth between Colusa and Chico Landing (50 miles), was reclassified as "deferred." Channel is navigable all year; however, there is no regular navigation above Colusa, 145 miles above river mouth. Construction of 3()-foot deep water ship channel was initiated in July 1949; improvement dredging by continuing contracts resulted in provision of an operational facility for oceangoing vessels during June 1963. Bascule bridge was completed in April 1960, barge lock in August 1961, barge canal in November 1961, and entire deep water ship channel in June 1970. 2. SAN FRANCISCO BAY TO STOCKTON, CALIF. (JOHN F. BALDWIN AND STOCKTON SHIP CHANNELS) Location. On navigation channels extending from entrance to San Francisco Bay to Port of Stockton through San Francisco, Marin, Contra Costa, Solano, Sacramento, and San Joaquin Counties. (See Coast and Geodetic Charts 5527 and 5532-5534 for respective areas.) Existing project. Project provides for modification of existing San Francisco Harbor, Richmond Harbor, San Pablo Bay and Mare Island Strait, Suisun Bay Channel, and San Joaquin River navigation projects to provide depths of 55 feet for San Francisco Bar Channel, 45 feet for main internal bay channels upstream to vicinity of Avon, and 35 feet from Avon to Stockton; enlargement and deepening to 45 feet of maneuvering areas adjacent to major petroleum refinery terminals along channel route; widening Suisun Bay Channel; reclaiming shoreline marshes and inundated or low-lying areas by spoil deposit for public recreation and for industrial use; providing basic recreation facilities on some of the reclaimed areas for public use; and placing additional rock revetment on waterside of levees bordering channels. Approved project estimate (October 1981) is $221,020,000, (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period) comprising Federal cost (Corps) of $173,000,000, including basic recreation facilities ($6,200,000); Federal cost (Coast Guard) for navigation aids $1,220,000; and non-Federal cost of $46,800,000 for lands and damages, relocations, berthing areas, and spoil retention dikes, including the cash contribution ($250,000) that local interests must make for land enhancement at time of construction. Local interests must also pay, contribute in kind, or repay with interest one-half of separable cost of project allocated to recreation ($3,000,000). Existing project was adopted by 1965 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 208, 89th Cong., 1st sess., contains latest published map). Local cooperation. Local interests, through a public body legally authorized and financially capable, must give assurances they will furnish lands, easements, and rights-ofway for construction and future maintenance of the project and for aids to navigation, including spoil-disposal areas designated by the Chief of Engineers; provide necessary spoil retention dikes, bulkheads, and embankments except as applicable to spoil-disposal areas designated as public recreation areas; make utility modifications and relocations required for construction, including new bridges or bridge 35-2 SACRAMENTO, CALIF., DISTRICT alterations (except for railroad bridges), and absorb any increased annual maintenance and operation costs resulting therefrom; provide and maintain all necessary berthing areas, at a depth commensurate with project depth, at all terminals and wharves to be served by the deepened channels; and in recognition of the local land enhancement benefits to result from landfill during dredging, contribute to the United States 4 cents per cubic yard of all spoil material placed during initial contruction for modification of Suisun Bay Channel project on areas not developed for public use. Local interests must also give satisfactory assurances, before starting construction of the affected units, that they will maintain and operate the Federally provided recreation areas and facilities, continue to maintain to adequate standards the levees altered, set back or provided revetment protection, and hold the U. S. Government free from damages due to deposition of spoil and construction of new levees or reconstruction of existing levees. Local interests, represented by Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County and Stockton Port District, must, at time of construction, contribute $250,000 in cash for land enhancement; pay, contribute in kind, or repay with interest one-half of separable cost of project allocated to recreation ($3,000,000); and maintain and operate basic recreation facilities after construction and install additional basic facilities required as demands on area expand. No work shall be undertaken on a modification of Suisun Bay Channel project unit to deepen the channel to more than 35 feet between Avon and a proposed refinery or manufacturing plant, until local interests furnish formal assurances and definite plans for such installation within the Avon-Chipps Island reach of channel. Also, no work shall be undertaken on modification of San Joaquin River navigation project unit, regarding access channels in vicinity of Antioch, until local interests furnish formal assurances and definite plans for Port of Antioch. Formal assurances for deepening and otherwise improving the Stockton Deep Water Ship Channel from Pittsburg to Stockton were furnished by Stockton Port District April 9, 1970. The Port of Stockton will be requested to provide formal updated assurances for the Avon to Stockton portion prior to construction. No sec. 221 agreements are required for this project. Terminal facilities. See Part 2, Port Series No. 30 and 31, revised 1974, titled respectively: "The Ports of San Francisco and Redwood City, Calif." and "The Ports of Oakland, Alameda, Richmond, and Vallejo, and Ports on Carquinez Strait, Calif."; and Port Series No. 32, revised 1975, "The Ports of Sacramento, Stockton, Pittsburg and Antioch, Calif." Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce and will be adequate for future commerce upon completion of new terminal facilities. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Sacramento District: Engineering continued. Final environmental impact statement for the portion of project from Avon to Port of Stockton was submitted to Environmental Protection Agency on July 26, 1981. San Francisco District: Continued planning activities including model studies. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of project was initiated in June 1971 and is about 1 percent complete. 3. SAN JOAQUIN RIVER, CALIF. Location. Rises in east central California and flows westerly and northwesterly about 340 miles to its confluence with Sacramento River at head of Suisun Bay, 48 miles northeast of San Francisco. Deep water channel in San Joaquin River extends 41 miles from its mouth to Suisun Bay at Pittsburg to city of Stockton. Waterborne access to city provided by Stockton Channel, an artificial cut extending from river about 2 miles into city. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Sheet 5527.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement, modifications, and authorizing acts, see Annual Report for 1967. (See table 35-D for total cost of new work for project completed in May 1960.) Projects units (1950 modification) reclassifed and excluded from project cost are set forth in table 35-E. Modification of existing project is included as one unit of San Francisco Bay to Stockton, Calif., (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels) project, authorized by 1965 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 209, 89th Cong., 1st sess.); this modification is reported in detail under Sacramento District, Improvement No. 2. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed portion of project; for details of required cash contributions on completed, inactive and deferred portions of project, see Existing project paragraph, Annual Report for 1967. Terminal facilities. For description of harbor facilities at Port of Stockton, Calif., see Port Series 32, Ports of Sacramento, Stockton, Pittsburg and Antioch, Calif., revised 1975. Downstream from Stockton, traffic is accommodated by bank landings and sheds except at Antioch and near Pittsburg, where there are wharves for shallow- and deepdraft vessels. Terminal transfer facilities at public ocean terminal of Port of Stockton are adequate for present and immediate future. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition studies and miscellaneous inspections and reports were accomplished by hired labor. Stone protection maintenance, Stockton Deep Water Channel, San Joaquin River, completed in fiscal year 1980, has a revised fiscal year 1980 contract completion cost of $280,280, in lieu of $352,439, due to a $72,159 underrun in fiscal year 1981. (Repair or restoration of wavewash protection is required by legislation authorized by Improvement No. 2.) Condition at end of fiscal year. Active portion of existing project was completed in May 1960. Construction of project was initiated in December 1877. 4. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Record and condition surveys were conducted at various times during fiscal year at several navigation projects at a cost of $15,000. 5. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS See table 35-F. Flood Control 6. BUCHANAN DAM-H. V. EASTMAN LAKE, CHOWCHILLA RIVER, CALIF. Location. On Chowchilla River about 36 miles above its mouth and about 16 miles northeast of city of Chowchilla, Calif. (See Geological Survey quadrangles for area.) 35-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 Existing project. Provides for construction of a 205-foot high rockfill dam to create a reservoir with gross storage capacity of 150,000 acre-feet for flood control, irrigation, recreation, and fish and wildlife. In conjunction with dam, project plan provides for about 12 miles of downstream levee and channel construction on Ash Slough to accommodate a project design flow of 5,000 cubic feet per second within slough and 7 miles of levee and channel improvement on Berenda Slough. Operation and maintenance of dam and reservoir is the responsibility of the Federal Government. Cost estimate (October 1980) for existing project is $28,920,000, of which $27,370,000 is Federal cost, including $4,580,000 for basic recreation facilities, and $1,550,000 non- Federal costs for lands and damages, including relocations for downstream levee and channel improvements. Local interests have contracted with the Bureau of Reclamation (known as the Water and Power Resources Service between November 6, 1979, and May 18, 1981) for irrigation service. For future non-Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperat ior paragraph. Local interests have also, over a period of years, expended about $500,000 for construction of low levees and clearing downstream channels to provide some local flood protection in project area. This work is inadequate during major floods. Existing project was adopted by 1962 Flood Control Act (S. Doc. 98, 87th Cong., 2d sess., contains latest published map). Lake formed by Buchanan Dam on Chowchilla River was designated "H. V. Eastman Lake" by Public Law 93-217. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering continued. (Construction of Buchanan and Hidden dam and appurtenances combined under one contract.) A cultural resources booklet was completed by contract. Plans and specifications for road relocation around archeological sites were completed. Maintenance: Maintenance and operation activities were continued. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated at fiscal year cost of $3,872. Runoff of Chowchilla River above Buchanan Dam was below normal for the year. Maximum storage of 110,900 acre-feet occurred May 29, 1981. Maximum daily inflow to reservoir was 1,084 cubic feet per second on January 29, 1981. Maximum release of 708 cubic feet per second on June 28, 1981, was below maximum permissible flood release. During the year, no water was released for flood control, but about 102,200 acre-feet of water was released for irrigation and other purposes. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in July 1971 and was completed in May 1979. Project is about 99 percent complete. Dam closure was in March 1975; dam was completed in January 1976. Reservoir clearing and boundary marking were completed May 1975. Bifurcation structure was completed in February 1976. Channel improvement, Ash and Berenda Sloughs, was completed in March 1976. Recreation areas: Phase I was completed in January 1976; Phase II was completed in February 1978. Residences, administration building, and visitors center contract was completed in May 1978. Landscaping was completed in May 1979 and erosion control was completed in April 1979. Work remaining consists of completion of installation of piezometers (now deferred indefinitely) and completion of the road relocation. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in fiscal year 1981. 7. CALAVERAS RIVER AND LITTLEJOHN CREEK AND TRIBUTARIES, INCLUDING NEW HOGAN LAKE AND FARMINGTON DAM, CALIF. Location. Streams comprising Calaveras River and Littlejohn Creek groups rise in Sierra Nevada and its foothills, flow easterly across flatlands of San Joaquin Valley and empty into San Joaquin River directly, or through various sloughs, in vicinity of Stockton, Calif. Littlejohn Creek is in Calaveras, Stanislaus, and San Joaquin Counties. The three principal stream systems of the group are, from south to north, Lone Tree Creek, Littlejohn Creek, and Duck Creek. Calaveras River group is in Calaveras and San Joaquin Counties. The two principal streams of the groups are, from south to north, Calaveras River and Bear Creek. (See Geological Survey Valley Springs quadrangle for New Hogan reservoir area and Trigo and Bachelor Valley quadrangles for Farmington reservoir area.) Existing project. For description of completed improvements consisting of Farmington Dam, New Hogan Lake, and Bear Creek levee and channel improvement, and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1967. (a) Farmington: Total first cost (July 1955) for project was $3,995,684, of which $3,676,384 was Federal and $319,300 non-Federal for lands and damages including relocations. (b) New Hogan: Federal cost for project is $15,906,150, including $543,514 for basic recreation facilities. For future non-Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. Federal cost for additional recreation facilities funded from Code 710 appropriations is $897,742. (c) Bear Creek: Project cost is $6,485,734, of which $3,242,867 is Federal, including reimbursement ($488,096) to local interests of one-half of excess local interest cost of lands, rights-of-way, and relocations over estimated Federal construction cost in accordance with section 3, Public Law 738, 74th Congress. Non-Federal cost included in above amount is $3,242,867 for relocations and lands and damages, exclusive of above Federal reimbursement. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. New Hogan: Local interests must pay portion of first cost and annual operation and maintenance costs allocated to conservation functions of project. These costs are estimated at 36.2 percent of first cost and 38 percent of annual costs. In addition, local interests contributed land, the (July 1964) market value of which was $556,000. For years 1961 through 1970, an interim contract between the Bureau of Reclamation (known as Water and Power Resources Service between November 6, 1979, and May 18, 1981) and local water users provided for storage and payment of irrigation water; local interests paid $1,854,073 through December 31, 1980. A long-term contract between that agency and local water users was executed August 25, 1970. A concessionaire at New jHogan Marina provided public use facilities in accordance with lease agreement with the Secretary of the Army at an estimated cost of $100,000. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: New Hogan Lake, regular funds: None. Code 710 funds: None. Bear Creek, San Joaquin County: None. Maintenance: Farmington Dam-Maintenance and operation activities continued; structures were maintained in serviceable condition. During the rainflood season, maximum flow of Duck Creek diversion was 150 cubic feet per second March 19, 1981. Maximum flow of Littlejohn Creek at Farmington was 420 cubic feet per second March 19, 1981. Maximum storage 35-4 SACRAMENTO, CALIF., DISTRICT in reservoir was 2,900 acre-feet on March 25, 1981, and maximum daily inflow to reservoir was 900 cubic feet per second on March 20, 1981. New Hogan Lake - Maintenance and operation activities continued. Dam safety assurance studies were continued at fiscal year cost of $4,958. Structures were maintained in serviceable condition. Runoff of Calaveras River above New Hogan was below normal for the year. Maximum storage of 181,100 acre-feet occurred April 21, 1981. Maximum daily inflow to reservoir was 3,160 cubic feet per second on January 29, 1981. Maximum release of 319 cubic feet per second on June 17, 1981, was below maximum permissible flood release. During the year, no water was released for flood control, but about 96,200 acrefeet of water was released for irrigation and other purposes. Condition at end of fiscal year. Farmington Dam: Construction of Farmington project was initiated in July 1949 and completed for beneficial flood control operation in 1952. Duck Creek channel improvement was completed in November 1951; and channel improvement on south Littlejohn Creek was completed in May 1955. There are no recreation facilities or public-use areas. All work completed. New Hogan Lake: Construction was initiated May 1960, main dam closure November 1963, project completed for operational use in June 1964, and all work completed October 1973. Additional recreation facilities have been provided from Code 710 appropriations. Seepage measurement weir constructed in June 1980. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in fiscal year 1980. Bear Creek, San Joaquin County: Construction began in June 1963 and was completed in June 1967. Final cash contribution was made to local interests December 23, 1970. 8. CHESTER, CALIF. Location. North Fork of Feather River, immediately upstream from the town of Chester, Plumas County, Calif. (See Geological Survey quadrangles for area.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a 45-foot high upgated diversion dam on North Fork of Feather River about one and one-half miles above Chester, Calif. Diversion dam would divert flows in excess of the outlet capacity of the dam into a partially leveed diversion channel for conveyance of floodflows circuitously around the town and into Lake Almanor. Major relocation works required by adoption of the plan comprise construction of one 250-foot long bridge over the floodway and about one mile of county road. Cost estimate (October 1981) for existing project is $5,220,000, of which $3,570,000 is Federal cost; and $1,650,000 is non-Federal cost for lands, damages, and relocations (including $100,000 cash contribution for design and construction of two low water crossings). Existing project was adopted by 1968 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 314, 90th Cong., 2d sess., contains latest published map). Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Log boom was constructed upstream of diversion dam at contract cost of $19,250. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction on project began in June 1975. Diversion dam and channel improvement were completed and transferred to local interests for operation and maintenance in October 1976. Log boom was constructed upstream of diversion dam in fiscal year 1981. This boom was requested by State Department of Water Resources as part of a debris collection system to aid trout migration. 9. COTTONWOOD CREEK, CALIF. Location. On the main stem and the North, South, and Middle Forks of Cottonwood Creek in Shasta and Tehama Counties, Calif., on the eastern slope of the Coast Range and southern slope of the Trinity Range. Cottonwood Creek lies westerly of and drains into the Sacramento River midway between cities of Redding and Red Bluff and is one of the northermost tributaries of Sacramento River downstream from Shasta Dam. (See Geological Survey quadrangles for area.) Existing project. Provides for two multiple-purpose projects, construction of a 268-foot high random fill dam at Dutch Gulch site to create a reservoir with gross storage capacity of 1,100,000 acre-feet and a 238-foot high random fill dam at Tehama site to create a reservoir with gross storage capacity of 900,000 acre-feet for a total storage capacity of 2,000,000 acre-feet for flood control, irrigation, municipal and industrial water supply, recreation, and fish and wildlife. Operation and maintenance of dams and reservoirs will be the responsibility of the Federal Government. Approved cost estimate (October 1981) for existing project is $458,000,000, all of which is Federal cost, including $5,120,000 for basic recreation facilities. For future non- Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. Existing project was adopted by 1970 Flood Control Act. (Document not yet printed.) Local cooperation. Based on cost allocation studies contained in Cottonwood Creek Interim Review Report, about 71.6 percent of project first cost is allocated to water supply (estimated at $328,000,000 to be repaid by municipal water users) and about 3.1 percent allocated to irrigation (estimated at $14,200,000 to be repaid by water users). In addition, local interests are required to pay one-half of the separable costs of recreation lands and facilities and one quarter of the separable costs of the reservoir fisheries enhancement (estimated at $3,005,000 and $15,000, respectively for the initial facilities). Local interests must also furnish assurances that they will preserve, or restore and thereafter maintain at capacities prevailing in 1970, flood channels of Cottonwood Creek downstream of the reservoirs; local interests must adjust all claims concerning water rights arising from construction and operation of the improvements, including acquisition of water rights necessary for establishment and use of a permanent pool for recreation and fish and wildlife purposes, with exception of water rights needed for irrigation water, which are to be obtained by the Secretary of the Interior. A written agreement satisfying all requirements of sec. 221, Flood Control Act of 1970, Public Law 91-611, will be obtained from local interests prior to construction initiation. If the Secretary of the Interior is unable to make necessary repayment arrangements for irrigation services to be provided from Dutch Gulch or Tehama projects, or both, within three years after requested to do so by the Secretary of the Army, such project or projects will be constructed without the irrigation function. Shasta and Tehama Boards of Supervisors by resolutions of July 6, 1970, and August 4, 1970, respectively, have indicated willingness to meet requirements of local cooperation. At a public hearing November 29, 1978, supervisors from Shasta and Tehama Counties again expressed support for project and for continuing studies. On November 30, 1979, the California Department of Water Resources expressed interest in contracting for reservoir storage to meet municipal and industrial water supply demands on the State Water Project. 35-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 Operations and results during fiscal year. Preconstruction engineering studies were continued and Phase I, General Design Memorandum was essentially completed. Condition at end of fiscal year. Preconstruction planning was initiated in fiscal year 1977. 10. HIDDEN DAM-HENSLEY LAKE, FRESNO RIVER, CALIF. Location. On Fresno River about 50 miles above its mouth and about 15 miles northeast of Madera, Calif. (See Geological Survey quadrangles for area.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a 163-foot high earthfill dam to create a reservoir with gross storage capacity of 90,000 acre-feet for flood control, irrigation, recreation and other purposes. In conjunction with the dam, the project provides for about 13 miles of downstream levee and channel improvements on Fresno River immediately upstream of Chowchilla Canal crossing to accommodate project design flow of 5,000 cubic feet per second. Operation and maintenance of dam and reservoir is the responsibility of the Federal Government. Total first cost for existing project is $31,785,426, of which $30,555,426 is Federal cost, including $3,564,168 for basic recreation facilities, and estimated $1,230,000 non-Federal cost for lands and damages including relocations for downstream levee and channel improvements. Local interests have contracted with the Bureau of Reclamation (known as the Water and Power Resources Service between November 6, 1979, and May 18, 1981) for irrigation service. For future non-Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. Local interests have also, over a period of years, expended about $300,000 for construction of low levees and clearing downstream channels to provide some local flood protection in the project area. This work is inadequate during major floods. Existing project was adopted by 1962 Flood Control Act (S. Doc. 37, 87th Cong., 1st sess., contains latest published map). Lake created by Hidden Reservoir project on Fresno River was designated "Hensley Lake" by Public Law 93-603. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work. None. Maintenance: Maintenance and operation activities were continued. Fiscal year costs for major maintenance items at Hidden Dam consisted of: Seepage control at main dam initiated by contract, $132,145, and erosion control at boat ramp initiated by contract, $85,908. Dam safety assurance studies were continued at fiscal year cost of $31,751. Runoff of Fresno River above Hidden Dam was below normal for the year. Maximum storage of 44,500 acrefeet occurred May 10, 1981. Maximum daily inflow to reservoir was 476 cubic feet per second on March 20, 1981. Maximum release of 244 cubic feet per second on July 27, 1981, was below maximum permissible flood release. During the year, no water was released for flood control, but about 43,400 acre-feet of water was released for irrigation and other purposes. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in July 1971 and was completed in January 1979. Dam closure was in March 1975; dam was completed November 1975. Instrumentation was completed in January 1976. Downstream channel improvement, Fresno River, was completed April 1976. Recreation areas: Phase I was completed in March 1976; Phase II was completed in June 1978. Residences, administration building, grounds, and utilities contract was completed in February 1978. Landscaping was completed in December 1978 and erosion control was completed in January 1979. Project was completed in September 1980. Final land audit was approved February 5, 1980. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in fiscal year 1980. 11. HUMBOLDT RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, NEV. Location. In general vicinity of Elko, Nev., on headwater tributaries of Humboldt River. River basin of approximately 16,700 square miles is a high semiarid plateau crossed by numerous steep mountain ranges separated by broad, flat valleys. River valley extends about 300 miles. Principal headwater tributaries are North Fork, Marys River and South Fork. Elevations in basin vary from about 4,000 feet in Carson Sink to about 12,000 feet in Ruby Mountains. (See Geological Survey quadrangles for area.) Existing project. Provides for construction of three storage reservoirs on headwater tributaries and minor channel improvements at critical locations along Humboldt River above Rye Patch Reservoir. Dams are to be earthfill structures with gross storage capacities as follows: Hylton reservoir on South Fork, Humboldt River, 120,000 acre-feet; Devils Gate reservoir on North Fork, Humboldt River, 80,000 acre-feet; and Vista reservoir on Marys River, 50,000 acrefeet. All reservoirs would be operated primarily for flood control, but also for irrigation, recreation, and fish and wildlife purposes. Operation and maintenance of dam and reservoir will be the responsibility of the Federal Government. Cost estimate (October 1981) for existing project is $53,000,000, of which $50,200,000 is Federal cost, including $2,600,000 for basic recreation facilities, and $2,800,000 non- Federal cost for lands, damages, and relocations. Existing project was adopted by 1950 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 586, 81st Cong., 2d sess., contains latest published map). Local cooperation. Prior to initiation of construction, local interests are required to contribute $2,762,000 in cash toward reservoir construction costs, and to furnish assurances satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army that they will: (a) Provide free of cost to the United States, all necessary rightsof- way for proposed channel improvements, and undertake all utility revisions required; (b) maintain and operate at their own expense such channel improvements and appurtenant works after completion, in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army; (c) hold and save the United free from all damages arising from construction of operation of channel improvements and appurtenant works; (d) enter into an agreement among themselves as to method of operation of the reservoirs for irrigation subject to flood control priority; and (e) bear not less than one-half the separable costs of project allocated to recreation and fish and wildlife presently estimated to be $1,715,000, and bear all costs for maintenance and operation for these purposes. Elko County Fair and Recreation Board, by resolution of December 5, 1969, stated that requirements of local cooperation would be provided by the District Engineer and by letter of February 24, 1976, stated that funds for local share of project were available. Nev. State Legislature has passed a bill (Senate Bill 246) to provide $50,000 for an environmental and wildlife impact investigation for project. Right to store water in project reservoirs was awarded to Elko County Fair and Recreation Board in May 1970 and ruling was upheld by court decision in October 1971. State Engineer considers that combination of Humboldt River Decree, Corps flood control operating criteria, and State ruling on water storage right constitutes operation agreement required by authorizing act. 35-6 SACRAMENTO, CALIF., DISTRICT Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Preconstruction planning studies were continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Preconstruction planning was continued. Based on studies to date, proposed plan of improvement would consist only of Hylton Lake, formed by construction of a dam across the South Fork Humboldt River about 10 miles south of Elko, Nev. Benefit-cost analysis indicates that Devils Gate and Vista Lake units are not economically feasible at this time and should be deferred. Proposed plan of improvement, total cost $36,162,000 ($33,400,000 Federal; $2,762,000 non-Federal) at October 1981 price level. 12. ISABELLA LAKE, KERN RIVER, CALIF. Location. About 35 miles northeast of city of Bakersfield, Calif., near confluence of north and south forks of Kern River; auxiliary dam is about one-half mile east of main dam. (See Geological Survey quadrangles of area.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1967. Federal cost for new work is $22,027,452. For future non- Federal reimbursement see Local cooperation and Licenses paragraphs. Federal cost funded from Code 710 appropriations is $2,199,085. Operation and maintenance of dam and reservoir is Federal responsibility. Local cooperation. California officially adopted project by chapter 1514 of statutes of 1945, State of California. Local interests, represented by North Kern, Buena Vista, and Tulare Lake Basin Water Storage Districts and La Hacienda Water District, were required to reimburse the Federal Government the portion of first cost and annual operation and maintenance costs allocated to irrigation functions of project. These costs based on a cost allocation study completed in December 1955, are $4,573,000 of first cost and 21.7 percent of annual operation and maintenance cost. For the years 1956 through 1964, an interim contract between the Bureau of Reclamation (known as the Water and Power Resources Service between November 6, 1979, and May 18, 1981) and local water users provided for storage and payment of irrigation water. Under provisions of this interim contract, local interests paid $1,936,229 through December 31, 1964. A long-term contract between the Bureau and local water users was executed October 23, 1964. Balance due on allocated first cost of $4,573,000 was paid by the water users on March 31, 1965. Kern County assumed administration of recreation and development and maintenance of public use areas at project in accordance with a 25-year license February 15, 1955. The agreement with Kern County provided for joint operation and development by the Corps and Kern County including permits granted to concessionaires by the county to provide certain services. As of September 30, 1971, Kern County relinquished all administration of recreation and development and maintenance of public use areas at the project. A State law permitting the Department of Boating and Waterways (known as the Department of Navigation and Ocean Development prior to January 1979) to participate in inland water development with Federal agencies was signed by the Governor on August 11, 1972. All concessionaires will operate under permits granted by the Corps. Total cost of present recreation facilities developed by the county and the marina concessionaires is about $880,000; $235,000 of this was a grant from the California Wildlife Conservation Board and about $370,000 is investment by marina concessionaires. Licenses. In accordance with Federal Power Commission Docket No. E-6578, issued April 1, 1963, payment of $377,426 was made to the Federal Government by Pacific Gas and Electric Co. ($108,352) and Southern California Edison Co. ($269,074) for headwater benefits to downstream existing plants from Isabella Dam to cover benefits from April 15, 1954, to December 31, 1962. Subsequent to 1962, the power companies have in the aggregate made annual payments of $44,650 for headwater benefits. That amount was to be paid each year until changes in operation, development, or costs indicated some modification to be advisable. No collection was made in fiscal year 1981. Federal Power Commission Docket No. E-6578 is being modified to increase cumulative use charges for subsequent years. Cumulative use charges collected by the Federal Power Commission (known as the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission since January 9, 1978) and returned to the U. S. Treasury through period ending September 30, 1981, amounted to $1,181,126. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work, regular funds: None. Code 710 funds: Engineering continued. Maintenance: Maintenance and operation continued. Repair of oxidation pond initiated and completed by contract, $101,276. Dam safety assurance studies at Isabella Dam were continued by contract and hired labor at a fiscal year cost of $309,951. Structures were maintained in good condition. Runoff of Kern River above Isabella Lake was below normal for the year. Maximum storage of 330,400 acre-feet occurred October 1, 1981. Maximum daily inflow to the reservoir was 2,154 cubic feet per second on May 2, 1981, and maximum outflow of 1,718 cubic feet per second occurred October 13, 1980. Release of water for irrigation and spreading uses totaled 543,500 acre-feet and release for flood control was about 24,200 acre-feet. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in March 1948 and was completed in June 1968. Main dam, Borel Canal outlet works and appurtenances, and auxiliary dam were completed in April 1953. Storage impoundment began December 1952. Project is operating to provide flood protection and irrigation benefits for which it was designed. Additional recreation facilities were provided by Code 710 funds. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in fiscal year 1979. 13. KAWEAH AND TULE RIVERS, INCLUDING TERMINUS DAM AND SUCCESS LAKE, CALIF. Location. Terminus Dam is on Kaweah River about 20 miles east of Visalia, Calif. Success Lake is on Tule River about 5 miles east of Porterville, Calif. (See Geological Survey quadrangles of area.) Existing project. Terminus Dam: For description of completed improvement and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1975. Federal cost of new work is $19,302,957, including $242,605 for basic recreation facilities and excluding spreading works constructed by local interests at an estimated (July 1957) cost of about $750,000. Spreading works portion of project has been deauthorized. The 90-day Congressional project review period, required by sec. 12, Public Law 93-251, as amended, ended August 5, 1977, and resulted in deauthorization of that portion of project. Federal cost of recreation facilities funded from Code 710 appropriations is $700,004. Success Lake: For description of completion improvement and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1975. Federal cost of new work for Success Lake is $14,247,221, including $253,697 for basic recreation facili- 35-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 ties. Federal cost of recreation facilities funded from Code 710 appropriations is $747,048. For future non-Federal reimbursements, see Local cooperation paragraph. Operation and maintenance of reservoirs is Federal responsibility. Local cooperation. California officially adopted projects by chapter 1514 of statutes of 1945, State of California. Local interests for Terminus Dam are represented by Kaweah Delta Water Conservation District. Local interests for Success Lake are considered to be represented by the Vandalia, Porterville, and Lower Tule River Irrigation Districts, the Tulare Lake Basin Water Storage District, and Pioneer Water Co., which represent over 90 percent of irrigated land and water-right holders along Tule River below damsite. Local interests must reimburse the Federal Government the portion of first cost and annual operation and maintenance costs allocated to irrigation functions of projects. These costs are estimated at 14.1 percent of first and annual costs for Terminus and 9.5 percent of first and annual costs for Success. Local interests for Terminus stated they will continue to operate and maintain spreading works and downstream channel systems to provide required capacity for disposal of floodwaters. Local interests for Success stated they will continue to maintain downstream channel systems to provide required capacity for disposal of floodwaters. Repayment contracts between the Bureau of Reclamation (known as the Water and Power Resources Service between November 6, 1979, and May 18, 1981) and local water users for irrigation supply from Terminus and Success reservoirs were executed January 11, 1965, and April 30, 1965, respectively. Reservoirs are being operated for irrigation storage as well as flood control and incidental recreation use. Tulare County acquired water for recreation pools at the projects. Local interests paid the following total amounts for irrigation services from the reservoirs through December 31, 1980: Terminus, $1,295,205 and Success, $585,234. Tulare County was granted a 25-year license for planning, development, and management of public recreation areas at Success, July 10,' 1960, and at Terminus, June 5, 1961. Basic public-use facilities constructed by Corps at the Success reservoir were transferred to jurisdication of Tulare County on January 18, 1962; facilities at Terminus were transferred June 20, 1962. In March 1967, an amendment to the license agreements was approved by the Assistant Secretary of the Army. Under these amended licenses, Tulare County retained administration of only specified land areas and operation and maintenance of recreation facilities in these areas. In addition, they continued their program of water safety, boat inspection, and law enforcement at both reservoirs. The Corps took over the administration of the remainder of the project land areas and the operation and maintenance of recreation facilities in these areas. Calif. Department of Fish and Game expended funds to improve fishery resources of the Terminus reservoir. As of April 1, 1972, Tulare County relinquished all planning, development, and management of public recreation areas at Terminus Dam. Tulare County by expenditure of county funds and by a lease to a marina concessionaire has aided in the development of recreation facilities at an estimated cost of $145,000. Calif. Department of Fish and Game expended funds in conjunction with Tulare Sportsman's Council, developing a habitat for upland game birds at Success Lake. As of April 1, 1972, Tulare County relinquished all planning, development, and management of public recreation areas at Success Lake, except for the Bartlett Park recreation area. Tulare County has aided in development of recreation facilities. Total cost of present recreation facilities developed by the county ($340,000) and the marina concessionaires ($150,000) is about $490,000. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Terminus Dam, regular funds: None. Code 710 funds: None. Success Lake, regular funds, None. Code 710 funds: None. Maintenance: Terminus Dam: Maintenance and operation continued. Dam safety assurance studies at Terminus Dam were continued at fiscal year cost of $86,443. Structures were maintained in serviceable condition. Runoff of Kaweah River above Terminus Dam was below normal for the year. Maximum storage of 132,400 acre-feet occurred on June 7, 1981. Maximum daily inflow to the reservoir on May 1, 1981, was about 2,383 cubic feet per second. Water released for flood control amounted to 26,400 acre-feet and irrigation and spreading releases totaled 220,500 acre-feet. Success Lake: Maintenance and operation continued. Dam safety assurance studies were continued at Success Dam at fiscal year cost of $108,603. Structures were maintained in serviceable condition. Runoff of Tule River above the reservoir was below normal during the year. Maximum daily inflow to the reservoir was 898 cubic feet per second on March 20, 1981, and maximum outflow of 688 cubic feet per second occurred on July 1, 1981. Maximum storage of 55,700 acre-feet occurred on May 30, 1981. Release of water for irrigation and spreading totaled 83,700 acre-feet and for flood control amounted to about 4,500 acre-feet. Condition at end of fiscal year. Terminus Dam: Construction of project began in July 1957 and was completed in June 1968 except for final settlement for one tract of land upon decision of pending court case. Construction of main dam and appurtenances, initiated in February 1959, was completed in June 1962. Dam has been operating since November 1961 to provide flood protection for which it was designed; conservation impoundment was commenced May 1962. Appurtenances are in good condition. Additional recreation facilities were provided by Code 710 funds. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in fiscal year 1979. Success Lake: Construction of project began in November 1956, was completed in June 1968, and final audit of historical land record was approved December 17, 1979. Construction of main dam and appurtenances, initiated in October 1958, was completed in May 1961. Dam has been operating since October 1960 to provide flood protection for which it was designed; conservation impoundment was commenced March 1962. Additional recreation facilities were provided by Code 710 funds. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in fiscal year 1979. 14. LAKE OROVILLE, CALIF. Location. Dam is on Feather River, a tributary of Sacramento River in Butte County, Calif., about 4 miles northeast of town of Oroville, and about 70 miles above mouth of Feather River. (See Geological Survey topographic maps of area.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1975. Sharable cost is $318,154,616 (exclusive of power and recreation facilities), of which $69,994,015 is Federal contribution toward new work, exclusive of $431,455 incidental Federal costs for engineering and administration of funds in connection with flood control reservation. Amount is based upon cost allocation studies completed in fiscal year 1961 and approved by the President of the United States on January 10, 1962. Total Federal participation is based on 22 percent of actual construction cost exclusive of cost of power and recreation facilities; however, the Federal cost is limited 35-8 SACRAMENTO, CALIF., DISTRICT to $85 million including actual Federal cost for engineering and administration of funds and interest at 3.5 percent per annum on actual Federal expenditures during construction period. Non-Federal (State of California) cost included in the above project amount is about $247,729,146 for construction of dam and reservoir. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Final Federal contribution of $64,186 was made to the State of California on February 9, 1981. Condition at end of fiscal year. State of California began relocations in May 1957 and initiated main dam contract in January 1963. Closure of main dam was completed October 6, 1967. Initial power unit went on line March 6, 1968, in Thermolito plant and the first Oroville plant unit went on line March 28, 1968. Dam was completed in September 1968. Final power units went on line July 20, 1969. As of September 30, 1981, total Federal contribution of $69,994,015 has been made to the State. 15. MARTIS CREEK LAKE, MARTIS CREEK, NEV. AND CALIF. Location. Reservoir is on Martis Creek a tributary of Truckee River, near Truckee, Calif.; intermittent channel improvements are on Truckee River in Reno, Nev. (See Geological Survey quadrangles for areas.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1975. Federal cost for project was $8,503,789 including $289,506 for basic recreation facilities. Federal cost of recreation facilities funded from Code 710 appropriations was $1,200. Construction of recreation facilities under Code 710 was determined to be infeasible. Operation and maintenance of reservoir is Federal responsibility. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Maintenance and operation of project, including recreation facilities, was continued. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated at fiscal year cost of $56,437. Structures were maintained in serviceable condition. Runoff above Martis Creek Dam was below normal for the year. Reservoir inflow and outflow were neglible. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project construction began in August 1967; dam closure was in October 1971; dam was completed in August 1972; basic recreation facilities were completed in December 1972; and project was completed in June 1974. Additional recreation facilities under Code 710 funding were considered infeasible. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in fiscal year 1981. 16. MERCED COUNTY STREAM GROUP, CALIF. Location. Reservoirs and channel improvements are on Bear, Burns, Mariposa, and Owens Creeks, in foothills of Sierra Nevada about 15 to 20 miles east of city of Merced, Calif. (See Geological Survey Haystack Mountain quadrangle for Burns and Indian Gulch quadrangle for Bear, Owens, and Mariposa areas.) Existing project. For description of completed improvements and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1962. Improvements consist of reservoirs at Mariposa, Owens, Burns and Bear Creeks and diversions from Black Rascal Creek to Bear Creek and from Owens Creek to Mariposa Creek. Total first cost for project was $3,899,259, of which $2,751,259 was Federal and $1,148,000 non-Federal for lands including relocations and channel improvement. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary maintenance and operation of the four completed reservoirs continued. Structures were maintained in a serviceable condition. Runoff from drainage areas above Merced County stream group reservoirs was below normal for the year. Outflows were less than channel capacity rates in the project streams. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was initiated March 1948, with construction of Mariposa project, which was completed in November 1948. Construction of Owens project, initiated in March, was completed in October 1949; Burns project, initiated in July 1949, was completed in January 1950; and Bear project initiated in April, was completed in December 1954. Black Rascal and Owens Creek diversion channels and stream-gaging stations were completed in April 1956. Local interests completed channel enlargement and restoration of channel capacities of Miles, Burns, Owens, and Mariposa Creeks in 1956 at their expense. Improvement of Bear Creek and Black Rascal Slough, below their confluence, was deferred pending possible improvements downstream, outside limits of project. 17. MERCED COUNTY STREAMS, CALIF. Location. In vicinity of city of Merced, Calif., on streams draining from Mariposa County foothills of the Sierra Nevada into Merced County. Streams lie easterly of and drain into the San Joaquin River between Chowchilla River on the south and Merced River on the north. Drainage area represents about 1,000 square miles, nearly 700 square miles of foothills and mountains in Mariposa County and about 300 square miles of flood plain in Merced County. (See Geological Survey quadrangles for area.) Existing project. Project is a modification of Merced County Stream Group, Calif., Improvement No. 16, authorized by 1944 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 473, 78th Cong., 2d sess.) and completed fiscal year 1957. Authorized project provides for construction of three new reservoirs-Castle, Haystack Mountain, and Marguerite on Canal, Black Rascal, and Deadman-Dutchman Creeks, respectively, and enlargement of four existing reservoirs-Burns, Bear, Owens, and Mariposa, providing a total capacity of 126,700 acre-feet for multipurpose storage; and about 52 miles of levee and channel improvements in lower reaches of Bear, Black Rascal, Mariposa, and Deadman Creeks, thereby tying the existing project channels into the Eastside Bypass of San Joaquin River flood control system. Haystack Mountain, Bear, and Owens projects would provide flood control only; Castle and Burns projects, flood control and recreation; Marguerite project, flood control and irrigation; and Mariposa project, all three purposes. Approved cost estimate (October 1980) for existing project is $89,100,000, of which $83,100,000 is Federal, including $5,265,000 for basic recreation facilities, and $6,000,000 is non-Federal. For future non-Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. Existing project was adopted by 1970 Flood Control Act (Document not yet printed.) Local cooperation. Local interests would be required to repay to the United States a portion of Castle, Burns, and Mariposa project costs allocated to general recreation and 35-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 fish and wildlife enhancement (estimated at $11,480,000), and to assure maintenance, operation, replacements and extension of recreation facilities at each of the dams; to repay to the United States the costs for irrigation service in Mariposa and Marguerite projects (estimated at $6,695,000) and furnish the water rights necessary to store water for irrigation purposes. In addition, in connection with the levee and channel improvement work, local interests would be required to: (a) Provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and relocations necessary for construction of improvements (b) hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction works; (c) maintain and operate all levee and channel works after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army; (d) prevent encroachments of any type that would impair the flood control effectiveness of the channels; and (e) preserve, or restore and thereafter maintain, at the capacities prevailing in 1968, the other flood channnels of Merced County Streams within proposed project limits downstream from the damsites or, in the case of unregulated streams, from the Merced Irrigation District main canal downstream to their confluence with the San Joaquin River flood control project. The Merced County Board of Supervisors by resolution March 30, 1976, has indicated willingness to support flood control aspects of the project. Local interests informally expressed intent to at least annually inform affected interests of the degree of protection provided by project. An ordinance was passed and adopted by the Merced County Board of Supervisors on August 5, 1969, to establish a primary and a secondary flood plain area to provide for the control of land use and structures within the various watersheds of their flood plain areas. City of Merced by letter of December 4, 1979, has reaffirmed intent to provide assurances of local cooperation for trail-based recreation. On November 28, 1979, the State Reclamation Board indicated intent to furnish assurances for flood control aspects of project. Assurances of local cooperation for irrigation have not been requested pending resolution of plan of improvement. A written agreement satisfying all requirements of sec. 221, Flood Control Act of 1970, Public Law 91- 611, will be obtained from local interests prior to construction initiation. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning studies were continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Preconstruction planning was continued. Plan of improvement, total cost (October 1981) $130,500,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period) ($103,000,000 Federal; $27,500,000 non-Federal), recommended in the Phase I General Design Memorandum would reduce project scope and provide for 59,500 acre-feet of flood control storage by enlarging existing Burns and Bear reservoir projects and new construction of Castle and Haystack Mountain Dams and for construction of 33.4 miles of levee and channel improvement on Bear, Fahrens and Black Rascal Creeks. Plan would defer enlargement of existing Mariposa reservoir, construction of Marguerite Dam and the irrigation function associated with these facilities, enlargement of existing Owens reservoir and about 32 miles of levee and channel improvement on Owens, Mariposa, and Deadman-Dutchman Creeks. 18. PINE FLAT LAKE AND KINGS RIVER, CALIF. Location. Reservoir is on Kings River, about 25 miles east of Fresno, Calif., and channel improvements are on Kings River downstream from Lemoore weir, about 25 miles south of Fresno. (See Geological Survey quadrangles of area.) Existing project. Improvement is a unit in comprehensive plan for flood control and other related purposes for Sacramento-San Joaquin Basins. Project consists of a 429- foot high concrete gravity dam, including a gated overflow section with a maximum discharge capacity of 391,000 cubic feet per second, creating a reservoir with gross storage capacity of 1 million acre-feet, for flood control, irrigation, and related purposes. Outlet provisions for future power development are included in dam, but Federal construction of power-generating facilities is not authorized. Improvement also includes levee and channel work on Kings River and its distributaries on valley floor about 25 miles south of Fresno. Channel improvement work will enlarge channel capacities and regulate flows in lower branches of the Kings River. There are nine public-use and recreation areas: One maintained by the Corps, four by the Forest Service, three jointly by the Corps and concession, and one by Fresno County. Also, five boat access-only areas are maintained by the Corps on the south side of the reservoir. Project cost is $42,072,330, of which $41,502,330 is Federal (including $13,700 for basic recreation facilities) and $570,000 non- Federal for rights-of-way for downstream channel improvements. For future non-Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperatiwn paragraph. Federal cost of recreation facilities for Pine Flat Lake, funded from Code 710 appropriations is $1,595,100 exclusive of recreation facilities previously provided at a cost of $13,700. In addition, Federal cost of recreation facilities for Pine Flat Lake, funded from Public Works Acceleration Executive Act of 1962 appropriations, was $239,235 (July 1963). Operation and maintenance of dam and reservoir is Federal responsibility. Existing project was adopted by 1944 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 630, 76th Cong., 3d sess., contains latest published map). Local cooperation. Local interests must reimburse the Federal Government for first costs allocated to irrigation functions of reservoir portion of project in accordance with reclamation law. Under provision of War Department Civil Appropriations Act of 1947, the Secretary of War, with concurrence of the Secretary of the Interior, determined allocation of cost to irrigation should be set at an amount not to exceed $14,250,000. In addition, local interests must pay 37.4 percent of annual maintenance, operation, and replacement costs of dam and reservoir allocated to irrigation function. Repayment contracts between the Bureau of Reclamation (known as the Water and Power Resources Service between November 6, 1979, and May 18, 1981) and the local water users for the irrigation use of the reservoir were executed December 23, 1963. The Bureau is administering the contracts in accordance with reclamation law; however, local interests are testing in court the validity of reclamation law in regard to the Pine Flat contracts. Prior to execution of the final contracts, the Bureau provided conservation water to local interests under an interim contract. Irrigation interests paid $12,300,131 for irrigation services through December 31, 1980. With respect to the downstream channel improvements, sec. 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies. King River Conservation District represents local interests; assurances were accepted November 20, 1959. Local interests have furnished all requirements for construction rights-of-way for construction of channel improvements required to date. Three concessionaires-one each at Lakeridge Marina (Deer Creek), Lakeview Marina (Lombardo's Fishing Village), and Trimmer Marina provided public-use facilities in accordance with lease agreements with the Secretary of the Army. 35-10 SACRAMENTO, CALIF., DISTRICT Estimated cost of facilities installed by these concessionaires is $525,000. Fresno County developed public-use facilities on an 85-acre tract immediately downstream from dam for picnicking, camping, swimming, and playground activities, at an estimated cost of $350,000 under provisions of a license agreement. The U.S. Forest Service developed and operates a picnic area at the upper end of reservoir. Cost of site development is about $37,500. Licenses. License No. 1988, effective April 1, 1955, was issued by Federal Power Commission to Pacific Gas and Electric Co. for hydroelectric power development of North Fork Kings River by the company upstream from the Pine Flat reservoir. Under interim Contract No. DA-04-167-eng- 1182 with the Department of the Army, Pacific Gas and Electric Co. paid for storage of power water in the Pine Flat reservoir May 15, 1954, through March 31, 1955. Current Contract No. DA-04-167-eng-1328 with the Department of the Army provides for storage of power water at the rate of 0.1375 per acre-foot; the contract covers April 1, 1955, through March 31, 2005. By an agreement of January 1972, supplementing the December 1954 contract, Pacific Gas and Electric Co. transferred ownership of most of its Kings River system water to the Kings River Water Association. Accordingly, no further significant storage service to Pacific Gas and Electric Co. by the reservoir at Pine Flat is anticipated. Total payment under these contracts through June 30, 1972, (last year of payment), amounts to $2,478,798; these funds are paid to Sacramento District and deposited for return to the Treasury. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work, regular funds: None. Code 710 funds: None. Maintenance: Maintenance and operation activities continued. Claim of $135,574 paid in fiscal year 1981 increased fiscal year 1980 foundation drain drilling contract cost to $562,290. Structures were maintained in serviceable condition. Runoff of Kings River above Pine Flat Dam was below normal for the year. Maximum storage of 948,700 acre-feet occurred on May 15, 1981. Maximum daily inflow to the reservoir was 6,850 cubic feet per second on May 2, 1981, and maximum outflow of 8,060 cubic feet per second occurred on June 22, 1981. No water was released for flood control. Release of water for irrigation and spreading totaled 1,411,500 acrefeet. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in April 1947 and project was completed in September 1977. Main dam was initiated in January 1950, completed in June 1954, and has been operating since February 1954 to provide flood protection for which it was designed. Total of 35.2 miles of new and reconstructed levees and 13.2 miles of channel clearing have been transferred to the Kings River Conservation District for maintenance. Recreation facilities for various recreation areas under Code 710 appropriation are complete. Completed preliminary design and cost estimates for Pine Flat fish barrier were reviewed by the State, but the State was unable to provide necessary assurances of local cooperation. 19. SACRAMENTO RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, CALIF., FROM COLLINSVILLE TO SHASTA DAM Location. Rises in Trinity Mountains in north-central California, flows generally southerly about 374 miles and empties into Suisun Bay, an arm of San Francisco Bay at Collinsville, Calif. Works covered by this improvement are on Sacramento River and tributaries from Collinsville to Shasta Dam, about mile 312. Drainage area above Rio Vista is 26,500 square miles (See Geological Survey quadrangles of area for Sacramento River and Upper Butte Basin; Flournoy and Fruto quadrangles for Black Butte Lake; and Tuscan Buttes, Tehama, Redding, and Hooker quadrangles for Table Mountain Lake.) Existing project. Improvement of Sacramento River and tributaries, from Collinsville to Shasta Dam was authorized as a unit of a comprehensive plan for flood control and other related purposes in Sacramento River Basin. (a) Sacramento River and major and minor tributaries, for flood control purposes: Enlargement of existing levees on Sacramento River between vicinity of Moulton weir and Ord Bend; construction of new levees from present levee terminus to vicinity of Chico Landing; construction of a weir near Chico Landing, extension of Moulton weir, and construction of a bypass through Upper Butte Basin; construction of new levees in Lower Butte Basin; enlargement of existing levees in Sutter, Tisdale, Sacramento, and Yolo Bypasses; and levee construction and/or channel enlargement on following minor tributaries of Sacramento River: Antelope Creek; Chico and Mud Creeks and Sandy Gulch; Butte and Little Chico Creeks; Cherokee Canal; Elder Creek; Deer Creek (Tehama County); Thomes Creek; and Willow Creek. Improvement provides for about 155 miles of channel improvement and about 294 miles of levees with an average height of 12 feet and a freeboard of 3 feet. Improvement also provides for revetment as required for protection of bypass levee slopes against erosion. Total first cost for project is $18,300,000 (October 1981), of which $11,900,000 is Federal, and $6,400,000 non-Federal for lands and damages, including relocations. (See table 35-G on project units classified and excluded from cost estimate.) (b) Sacramento River, Chico Landing to Red Bluff, Calif: An extension of the existing Sacramento River Flood Control project which provides for construction of bank protection works and minor channel improvements as required on Sacramento River between Chico Landing and Red Bluff for flood control purposes. Estimated first cost (October 1981) for project work in Tehama, Butte, and Glenn Counties is $14,580,000, of which $12,900,000 is Federal cost and $1,680,000 non-Federal cost for lands and damages including relocations. (c) Sacramento River, Calif., Bank Protection Project: Includes initial phase covering 405,000 lineal feet of bank protection and a second phase covering 430,000 lineal feet of bank protection under a long range program of bank protection, erosion control works, and setback levees at critical locations within limits of authorized or existing levees included in the Sacramento River Flood Control project to protect integrity of levee system for flood control purposes. Total estimated (October 1981) first cost for project is $164,900,000, (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period), of which $110,000,000 is Federal (including $2,340,000 for recreation facilities) and $54,900,000 non-Federal comprising $30,800,000 for lands and damages including relocations and $24,100,000 required cash contribution toward first cost. Construction in (a), (b), and (c) above supplements program of levee improvements as accomplished pursuant to 1917 Flood Control Act, as amended by subsequent acts, including 1941 Flood Control Act, and which are reported by California Debris Commission under Sacramento River, Calif., flood control. (d) Authorization also provided for Black Butte Lake. For description of completed project see Annual Report for 1975. Federal first cost for project is $14,508,820, including $475,507 for basic recreation facilities. For future non- 35-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. Federal cost for additional recreation facilities funded from Code 710 appropriations is $1,000,162. A concessionaire at Black Butte Marina provided public use facilities in accordance with lease agreement with the Secretary of the Army at an estimated cost of $80,000. (e) Authorization also provided for construction of Table Mountain (Iron Canyon) project, an earthfill dam on Sacramento River about 3 miles north of Red Bluff, Calif. This project unit was deauthorized August 5, 1977. For details, see Annual Report for 1978. (See table 35-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. (a) Sacramento River and major and minor tributaries: Sec. 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies. Fully complied with for all work completed or under contract, and local interests indicated they will be able to fulfill requirements for remaining work as scheduled. Levee construction (107 miles) total requirement for the "active" project has been completed, transferred to, and accepted by the State. (b) Sacramento River, Chico Landing to Red Bluff: Sec. 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies; local interests must also assume responsibility for flood plain zoning. Fully complied with for portions completed in Tehama, Butte, and Glenn Counties; completed work, bank protection at 29 sites, was transferred to and accepted by the State. (c) Sacramento River Bank Protection Project: Sec. 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies. Local interests must also contribute an amount in cash that, when added to costs of lands, easements, rights-of-way and utility modifications, equals one-third of cost of each unit of remedial work; this contribution is estimated (October 1981) at $24,100,000. Local interests fully complied with requirements for all work completed or under contract, and indicated they will be able to fulfill requirements for remaining work as scheduled. In addition, for reaches where local interests request bank stabilization in lieu of more feasible levee setbacks, local interests will contribute costs over and above costs of setbacks, and provide local contribution indicated above. Completed units transferred to and accepted by the State. (d) Black Butte Lake: None required for construction. Local interests must pay the portion of first cost and annual operation and maintenance costs allocated to the conservation functions of the project; these costs are estimated at 39.9 percent of first cost and 40.2 percent of annual costs. From March 2, 1960, to October 22, 1970, contract between the Bureau of Reclamation (known as the Water and Power Resources Service between November 6, 1979, and May 18, 1981) and the State of Calif. provided for repayment of irrigation storage costs; Bureau administered contract in accordance with reclamation law. Local interests paid a total of $77,205 for irrigation services during this period. Public Law 502, 91st Cong., 2d sess., October 23, 1970, provided that Black Butte project be financially integrated with the Central Valley project, coordinated operationally with other Central Valley project storage units by the Bureau under the Secretary of the Interior, and that dam and reservoir at Black Butte be physically operated and maintained by the Corps in a manner compatible with recreational use of the reservoir. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: (a) Sacramento River and major and minor tributaries-Minor engineering and design activities continued. Inspection of bypass levees after 1980-1981 winter floodflows indicated that erosion was insufficient to justify remedial work in current fiscal year. (b) Sacramento River Bank Protection Project-Engineering and design activities continued. (See table 35-H for construction accomplished and contract costs.) (c) Sacramento River, Chico Landing to Red Bluff-None. (d) Black Butte Lake, regular funds: None. Code 710 funds: Final payment of $2,161 in fiscal year 1981 resulted in revised fiscal year 1980 contract (improvement of sanitary facilities at Buckhorn campground) completion cost of $178,293. Maintenance: Maintenance and operation activities continued. Dam safety assurance studies were continued at fiscal year cost of $58,955. Structures were maintained in serviceable condition. Runoff above Black Butte Dam was below normal for the year. Maximum storage of 103,400 acrefeet occurred April 25, 1981. Maximum daily inflow to Black Butte reservoir was 6,120 cubic feet per second on January 28, 1981, and maximum outflow of 2,059 cubic feet per second occurred on February 15, 1981. Releases of water for irrigation totaled 162,100 acre-feet and flood control releases totaled 34,300 acre-feet. (e) Table Mountain (Iron Canyon) Lake: None. Condition at end of fiscal year. (a) Sacramento River and major and minor tributaries (active portions): Construction was initiated in May 1949 on Deer Creek and Butte Creek units; Cherokee Canal, Elder Creek, Chico and Mud Creeks, and Sandy Gulch units have been completed. Active portion of this improvement is about 93 percent complete. Work remaining is bypass levee revetment as required. (b) Sacramento River Bank Protection Project: Construction of first unit was initiated in June 1963; initial phase of project was completed in November 1974. Phase II is underway, and overall project is about 55 percent complete. (c) Sacramento River, Chico Landing to Red Bluff: Active portion of project, bank protection in Tehama County, was initiated in June 1963 and completed in March 1964. Project was reopened in June 1968 to place additional necessary bank protection. Work at 29 sites was completed in Tehama, Butte, and Glenn Counties as of September 1979. (d) Black Butte Lake: Construction began in March 1960 and project is complete. Final land acquisition was completed in December 1966. Construction of main dam was initiated in June 1960 and completed in December 1963. Dam has been operating since November 1962 to provide the flood protection for which it was designed. Final cost allocation approved May 3, 1977. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in fiscal year 1980. (e) Table Mountain (Iron Canyon) Lake: Project unit deauthorized as of August 5, 1977. 20. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Approved regulations for operation and maintenance of flood control works, part 208, title 33, Code of Federal Regulations, provide for inspection of completed projects transferred to local interests for operation and maintenance to determine status of project and insure compliance with regulations. During fiscal year, inspections were made of: Completed units of Sacramento River and major and minor tributaries; completed units of Sacramento River flood control project, Kings River Channel Improvement (Pine Flat Lake project), and Walnut Creek project; American River levees; Chester, North Fork Feather River; levee and channel improvements on Chowchilla River (Buchanan project) and Fresno River (Hidden project); Middle Creek; Duck Creek diversion, Green Valley Creek, Littlejohn Creek, Mormon Slough, Bear Creek, Kern River-California Aqueduct Intertie, and North Fork, Pit River at Alturas, all in California; Truckee River, Calif. and Nev.; completed units of lower San Joaquin River and tributaries, Calif.; Big Dry Creek Dam and diversion, Calif.; Reese River, Battle Mountain, Nev.; Sevier River, Redmond and vicinity, Jordan 35-12 SACRAMENTO, CALIF., DISTRICT River, Big Wash near Milford, and Kays Creek, all in Utah; various emergency flood control works under authority of sec. 208, Flood Control Act of June 30, 1948, and September 3, 1954; Public Law 99, June 28, 1955, and antecedent legislation; and sec. 14 of Flood Control Act of July 24, 1946. Maintenance inspections conducted indicate that existing agreements and regulations are being complied with on completed flood control works. Continuing effort is required to improve maintenance practices and active steps are being taken by responsible State and local agencies to achieve desired results. Local agencies were advised, as necessary, of measures required to maintain these projects in accordance with standards prescribed by regulations. Total cost of inspection for fiscal year of $187,161 included continuation of dam safety assurance programs for Big Dry Creek ($1,633) and Folsom Lake, Calif. ($6,743). 21. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS In accordance with sec. 7, Flood Control Act of 1944, summaries of monthly operations at Big Dry Creek, Boca, Camanche, Folsom, Friant (Millerton Lake), Indian Valley, Los Banos Detention, New Bullards Bar, New Don Pedro, New Exchequer (Lake McClure), New Melones, Oroville, Prosser, Shasta, and Stampede, Calif.; East Canyon, Echo, Lost Creek, Pineview, Starvation, and Wanship, Utah; Blue Mesa, Lemon, Paonia, Ruedi, and Vallecito, Colo.; and Navajo, New Mex. reservoirs were prepared. Revised water control manuals were prepared for Friant, Camanche, and New Exchequer. Working agreements and new flood control diagrams for Camanche and New Exchequer are awaiting project owners' signature. A new flood control diagram for Friant was sent to Bureau of Reclamation for signature. Corps personnel provided advice as requested during flood control operations at all sec. 7 reservoirs. Fiscal year cost was $203,702. Total cost to September 30, 1981, was $1,647,354. 22. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See table 35-I. 23. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to sec. 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (Preauthorization). Costs for preauthorization studies for fiscal year were as follows: Calif.: Anderson Creek, $14,724; Burney Creek, $686; and Fourteenmile Slough, $48,071. Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation). Federal cost for fiscal year was $1,839,082, of which $94,140 was for disaster preparedness, $857,016 for flood emergency operations, $885,920 for repair and restoration, and $2,007 for advance measures. Emergency bank protection (sec. 14, 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Cong.) Federal cost for fiscal year was $109,653. Bank protection was completed on Calaveras River, Shelton Road, Calif. ($76,339) and on Sutter Creek near lone, Calif. ($33,314). Snagging and clearing navigable streams and tributaries in interest of flood control (sec. 208, 1954 Flood Control Act, Public Law 780, 83d Cong.) Total Federal cost for fiscal year was $50,333. Reconnaissance reports for snagging and clearing on Kaweah River, Calif. ($5,000), Middle River, Calif. ($5,000), and Orestimba Creek, Calif. ($5,000) were accomplished by Architect- Engineer contract. Detailed Project Report studies for Orestimba Creek were terminated for lack of local support ($35,333). Flood insurance activities (sec. 1301-1377, 1968 Housing and Urban Development Act, Public Law 90-448 as amended). In coordination with flood control activities, 18 flood insurance studies were completed in accordance with Inter- Agency Agreements (IAA) H-10-77 and H-9-79 at a fiscal year cost of $16,556 under Housing and Urban Development reimbursable order. Multiple-Purpose Projects including Power 24. NEW MELONES LAKE, CALIF. Location. On Stanislaus River about three-quarters mile downstream from existing Melones Dam and about 35 miles northeast of city of Modesto. (See Geological Survey quadrangles of the area.)' Existing project. Provide for construction of (a) an earth and rockfill dam about 625 feet high to create a reservoir with gross storage capacity of about 2,400,000 acre-feet for flood control, irrigation, power, general recreation, fish and wildlife, and other purposes, and (b) a powerplant below the dam with an installed capacity of 300,000 kilowatts. Upon completion of construction of dam and powerplant by the Corps, the project became an integral part of Central Valley project and is being operated and maintained by the Secretary of the Interior pursuant to Federal reclamation laws, except that the flood control operation of the project shall be in accordance with rules and regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army. Maintenance of Stanislaus River channel from Goodwin Dam to San Joaquin River to a capacity of at least 8,000 cubic feet per second will also be Corps responsibility. Approved estimated (October 1981) Federal cost is $380,000,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period). For future non-Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. In addition, local interests expended $300,000 for levees along lower reaches of Stanislaus River. Existing project was adopted by 1962 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 453, 87th Cong., 2d sess., contains latest published map). This act modified original authorization adopted by 1944 Flood Control Act. (H. Flood Control Committee Doc. 2, 78th Cong., 2d sess., contains latest published map.) The 1944 Flood Control Act established $8 million monetary limitation for partial accomplishment of project. Further monetary authorizations of $2.5 million, $5 million, $13 million, $2 million, $17 million, $18 million, $44 million, $83 million, $46 million, $6 million, and $61 million were provided for this project by Public Laws 235 and 780, 83d Cong., and 85-500, 90-17, 90- 483, 91-282, 92-222, 93-251, 94-397, 95-104, and 95-189, 35-13 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 making a total monetary authorization of $305,500,000 available for the basin plan comprising Lower San Joaquin River and tributaries, including Tuolumne and Stanislaus Rivers, Calif. Since fiscal year 1979, appropriations have not been subject to the river basin monetary limitation and legislation is before Congress to eliminate the monetary limitation ceiling. Local cooperation. Based on approved preliminary cost allocation studies (July 1965) local interests will be required to pay 35.2 percent of first cost and 12.7 percent of annual operation and maintenance costs allocated to irrigation. In addition, 31.1 percent of first cost and 62.5 percent of annual cost would be allocated to power. Local interests must also maintain existing private levees along Stanislaus River from Goodwin Dam to San Joaquin River and prevent encroachment on channel and floodway between levees to preserve safe carrying capacity throughout the reach of at least 8,000 cubic feet per second. Recovery of costs allocated to irrigation and power will be the responsibility of the Bureau of Reclamation (known as the Water and Power Resources Service between November6, 1979, and May 18, 1981). Reimbursement of costs will be in accordance with Bureau policies and procedures for the Central Valley project. State of California officially adopted project by chapter 918 of statutes of 1963, and by chapter 1438 of those statutes authorized State Reclamation Board to furnish required assurances. The Board, by letter dated December 13, 1963, stated it would furnish required assurances when formally requested to do. Assurances were requested by letter of December 30, 1977. On October 2, 1979, the Board reaffirmed its intent to furnish the required assurances. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering activities continued including continuation of plans and specifications for the Lower Stanislaus recreation areas. Fiscal year costs for major items of work included: Continuation of land acquisition activities, $1,944,675; initiation of reservoir area clearing contract, $1,548,062; completion of flood control and irrigation tailrace modification contract, $882,637; initiation and completion of water intake facilities contract, $348,000; initiation of Oakdale recreation contract, $330,594; initiation of Glory Hole recreation area contract, $1,201,081; and initiation of Tuttletown recreation area contract, $869,440. Maintenance: Maintenance and operation activities continued on the Lower Stanislaus River. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was initiated in August 1966. Main dam contract which was awarded in March 1974 has been completed; dam dedication ceremonies were held July 14, 1979. Powerplant and appurtenances contract, which was awarded in June 1976, has been completed and initial testing of the powerplant was completed in June 1979. Cultural resources preservation contract, water intake facilities contract, and flood control and irrigation tailrace modification contract have been completed. Reservoir area clearing contract, Oakdale recreation contract, Glory Hole recreation area contract, and Tuttletown recreation area contract have been initiated. Overall project is nearing completion except for Lower Stanislaus River recreation facilities, for which design is underway. A Memorandum of Understanding between the Department of the Interior and the Department of the Army transferring the New Melones dam and reservoir from the Corps of Engineers to the Bureau of Reclamation was executed on November 20, 1979. Agreement provides that the Corps complete land acquisition actions and retain budgeting, design, and construction responsibility for reservoir clearing and recreation development; completion of cultural resources mitigation in project area was vested in the Department of the Interior. The Calif. State Water Resources Control Board's Decision 1422 of April 1973 established conditions which impacted on the planned filling and operation of the project by the Department of the Interior. As a result, the Department of Interior brought suit against the State of Calif. claiming State limitations on project operation were contrary to Congressional intent and authority. The case was heard before the U.S. District Court in Fresno, Calif., and in early March 1981, a Federal judge ruled that the Federal Government could fill the New Melones reservoir for purpose of generating electrical power, but not for agricultural or other purposes. Both the Government and the Calif. State Resources Control Board have appealed this decision to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco, Calif. A court decision is still pending. Project is about 90 percent complete. General Investigations 25. SURVEYS See table 35-J. 26. MORRISON CREEK STREAM GROUP, CALIF. (PHASE I, FEASIBILITY STUDY) Phase I studies (estimated cost $3,000,000) were authorized by sec. 101(a), Water Resources Development Act, of 1976, in accordance with Report of Chief of Engineers, March 2, 1976. The October 1981 estimated project cost is $169,800,000, of which $105,000,000 is Federal and $64,800,000 non-Federal. Proposed plan of improvement would be located on streams in Morrison Creek Stream Group Basin in the central part of Sacramento County and would provide for construction of a dam with an 11,000 acrefoot reservoir at) the Vineyard site on Elder and Laguna Creeks, diversion of Morrison Creek flows into this reservoir, construction of 26 miles of levee and 66 miles of channel work along streams in the basin, and purchase of lands and related construction for a 7,800-acre flood retardation basin in the Beach-Stone Lakes area. Growing urban population in Sacramento metropolitan area has created a need for additional recreation opportunities in the basin, a need for preservation of choice existing open space, and a need to preserve diverse and valuable wildlife habitat existing in the Beach-Stone Lakes area. Phase I studies were continued. 27. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Under the National Program of Inspection of Dams, as authorized by the Dam Safety Act, Public Law 93-367, August 8, 1972, the dam inventory and dam inspection program was essentially completed, except for final state audits, for California, Nevada, and Utah at a fiscal year cost of $1,401,007. Technical assistance was performed for other Federal agencies as well as non-Federal agencies in connection with Flood Plain Management Services Program at fiscal year cost of $403,949. No Flood Plain Information Studies were prepared after fiscal year 1980. Fiscal year costs for hydrologic studies were $9,000. 35-14 SACRAMENTO, CALIF., DISTRICT 28. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT The Hydrologic Engineering Center was designated as a separate Field Operating Agency as of January 1, 1979, in accordance with OCE permanent orders 1-1, January 10, 1979, but Sacramento District is continuing to provide advisory and administrative support services to HEC as specified in local support agreement DACW05-79-A-0038 of March 1979. Fiscal year costs were $1,088,920, of which $1,072,024 was for analytical techniques, $1,821 for flood plain management, and $15,075 for earth resources satellites, all at the Hydrologic Engineering Center. 29. NATIONAL EMERGENCY PLANNING The mobilization program for national emergency planning was initiated in fiscal year 1981 under the Operation and Maintenance appropriation. Purpose of this program is to prepare the Corps of Engineers for undertaking ar extensive military construction program in case of a state o: national emergency or war. Such mobilization mean, providing real estate, engineering, planning, design, an construction support to the army installations within th Sacramento District. During an actual mobilization, somE civil works projects not essential to defense would be delayec or suspended, and the people and resources committed tc these projects would be directed to mobilization efforts Planning for the national emergency program was initiate( at a fiscal year cost of $80,257. 35-15 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 35-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 78 FY 79 1. Sacramento River, New Work Calif. Approp. - - Cost - - Maint. Approp. 608,800 343,000 Cost 598,906 393,001 2. San Francisco Bay New Work to Stockton, Calif. Approp. 1,480,000 250,000 (John F. Baldwin and Cost 845,464 1,020,965 Stockton Ship Channels) 3. San Joaquin River, New Work Calif. Approp. - - Cost - - Maint. Approp. 1,129,000 295,000 Cost 491,195 974,182 6. Buchanan I)am-H.V. New Work Eastman Lake, Approp. 260,000 - Chowchilla River, Cost 499,547 366,192 Calif. Maint. (Federal Funds) Approp. 421,500 514,500 Cost 375,380 563,626 (Contributed Funds, New Work Other)" Contrib. -6,813 - Cost - - Calaveras River and New Work Littlejohn Creek anrid Approp. 24,150 140,000 Tributaries including Cost 196,197 124,111 New Hogan Lake and Maint. Farmington Dam, Approp. 552,700 596,000 (CFaelidfe. ral Funds) Cost 613,416 635,276 (Contributed Funds, New Work Other) Contrib. - - Cost 27,181 - 8. Chester, Calif. New Work (Federal Funds) Approp. - - Cost 3,766 2,678 (Contributed Funds, New Work Other)' Contrib. -17,738 - Cost - - 9. Cottonwxood Creek, New Work Calif. Approp. 1,025,000 1,100,000 Cost 884,587 1,246,900 10. Hidden Dam-Hensley New Work Lake, Fresno Approp. 100,000 - River, Calif. Cost 326,596 285,914 (Federal Funds) Maint. Approp. 401,000 507,000 Cost 383,083 526,743 (Contributed Funds, New Work Other)'" Contrib. -6,888 - Cost - - 11. Humboldt River and New Work Tributaries, Nev. Approp. 227,984 15,000 Cost 214,915 41,110 12. Isabella Lake, Kern New Work River, Calif. Approp. 728,800 -200,000 (Federal Funds) Cost 159,598 477,677 Maint. Approp. 872,000 877,350 Cost 864,295 951,900 (Contributed Funds, New Work Other)"2 Contrib. - - Cost - - 35-16 FY 80 FY 81 Sept 30, 1981 - - 40,331,192' - - 40,331,192' 1,682,200 2,597,300 29,983,8312 290,722 3,480,162 29,471,424 585,000 850,000 9,409,0004 609,722 647,007 9,118,5556 - - 5,833,117" - - 5,833,117" 415,000 -79,000 9,489,4767 397,979 -61,787 9,489,3667 - 60,000 27,369,597 31,149 41,050 27,327,486 570,000 647,000 2,651,500 550,952 598,841 2,576,379 - - 111,187 - - 111,187 - - 23,723,144" 51,515 - 23,723,144'" 969,000 841,000 7,515,169" 936,875 765,773 7,397,231'2 - - 1,294,2511: '14 - - 1,294,2511: 14 - 30,000 3,570,000 4,396 26,564 3,566,564 - - 69,262 - - 69,262 1,250,000 1,650,000 5,525,000 1,111,715 1,773,318 5,479,499 - - 30,555,426 13,402 - 30,555,426 632,000 1,499,000 3,516,500 591,310 946,240 2,911,035 - - 165,112 - - 165,112 285,000 300,000 1,422,932 220,953 272,949 1,331,833 -10,000 - 24,450,537"7 '9 5,762 - 24,450,53718 20 1,153,000 1,550,000 12,101,958' 1,087,662 1,596,512 12,079,766 2 - - 438,000 - - 438,000 TABLE 35-A SACRAMENTO, CALIF., DISTRICT COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text 13. Project Kaweah and Tule Rivers including Terminus Dam and Success Lake, Calif. (Contributed Funds, Other) 14. Lake Oroville, Calif. 15. Martis Creek Lake, Martis Creek, Nev., and Calif. 16. Merced County Stream Group, Calif. 17. Merced County Streams, Calif. 18. Pine Flat Lake and Kings River, Calif. (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds, Other)x 19. Sacramento River and Tributaries, Calif. from Collinsville to Shasta Dam (Federal Funds) (Required Contributed Funds) (Contributed Funds, Other)11 15 24. Lower San Joaquin River and Tributaries, Calif. including Tuolumne and Stanislaus Rivers, Calif., New Melones Lake, Calif.' Funding New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost FY 78 Total Cost to FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 Sept 30, 1981 850 - - 1,750 96 - 1,177,000 1,316,400 1,729,000 1,137,724 1,439,897 1,718,138 11,000 1,420 - 27,181 12,419 - 116,500 750,000 426,308 113,953 742,352 427,327 1,200 - - 1,200 - - 211,000 151,750 160,000 250,289 198,596 152,515 96,500 51,907 1,025,000 301,904 735,000 69,734 758,600 744,143 55,525 3,710,000 4,198,665 551,000 558,434 500,000 422,511 984 1 67,000,000 59,974,672 97,000 88,745 90,000 128,764 268,000 870,172 110,000 753,825 749,700 831,798 765,000 3,713,939 632,400 716,465 200,000 639,652 1,420 12,419 13,405,000 27,590,740 115,000 113,658 117,700 125,290 655,000 777,725 250,000 271,440 1,686,000 1,657,512 1,841,000 1,516,498 938,000 921,588 350,000 341,003 11,461,692 10,716,483 191,000 189,147 - 34,997,23024 - 34,997,23025 1,575,000 12,438,52526 1,532,424 12,342,89027 - 42,42028 - 42,42029 56,634 70,425,470 65,904 70,425,470 - 8,504,98930 - 8,504,98930 210,000 1,700,350 217,492 1,689,100 - 2,751,25931 - 2,751,25931 81,000 973,506 69,548 959,700 1,350,000 4,506,000 1,368,594 4,503,115 - 43,356,26532 33 34 - 43,356,265 34 35 1,232,000 10,992,28536 1,187,602 10,880,87337 - 110,000 - 110,000 3,215,000 74,257,50839 40 3,564,715 74,098,69439 41 826,000 6,894,33442 787,350 6,794,91043 463,000 13,035,538 775,433 12,903,054 - 2,442,36246 47 - 2,442,36246 47 9,000,000 311,488,99648 9,828,850 311,042,42149 311,000 714,000 311,609 703,158 __ REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 35-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 1. Includes the following amounts for new work: Regular funds: Previous project, $185,198; existing project, $585,436 for shallow-draft and $39,560,558 for deep-draft. 2. Includes the following funds for maintenance: Regular funds: Previous project, $553,720; existing project, $15,206,287 for shallow-draft and $14,153,824 for deep-draft; and deferred maintenance funds, $70,000 for shallow-draft. :3. Includes the following costs for maintenance: Regular funds: Previous project, $553,720; existing project, $15,151,899 for shallow-draft and $13,695,805 for deep-draft; and deferred maintenance funds, $70,000 for shallow-draft. 4. Includes $3,098,800 funds for Sacramento District and $6,310,200 for San Francisco District. 5. Includes $3,098,800 costs for Sacramento District and $6,(019,756 for San Francisco District. 6. Includes $1,158,348 public work funds, of which $207,198 was for work done along 30 'ot channel in Suisun Bay Channel; excludes $19,000 expended for engineering for inactive portion of 1950 modification. In addition, $1,342,500 was expended from required contributed funds. 7. In addition, $1,250 was expended from required contributed funds. 8. Contributed funds, other, from State of California for design and construction of downstream channel improvements on Ash and Berenda Sloughs below Buchanan Dam. 9. Includes Code 710 funds for recreation facilities at New Hogan Lake: $24,150 and $140,000 for fiscal years 1978 and 1979, respectively. Total to date $897,742. 10. Includes Code 710 costs for recreation facilities at New Hogan Lake: $196,197, $124,111, and $51,515 for fiscal years 1978, 1979, and 1980, respectively. Total to date $897,742. 11. Includes $99,000 special recreation use fees at New Hogan Lake. 12. Includes $99,000 special recreation use costs at New Ilogan Lake. 13. For miscellaneous construction under local cooperation requirements, primarily Bear Creek, San Joaquin County; includes $108,056 as related to Duck and Littlejohn Creeks channel improvements as part of Farmington Dam project unit. 14. Includes $393,195 contributed funds, other, from California Department of Boating and Waterways for design and construction of boat launching and related facilities, and $30,000 for design and construction of a boarding float, at North Shore recreation area at New Hogan Lake. 15. Contributed funds, other, from State of California, for design and construction of two low water crossings and appurtenances at Chester. 16. Contributed funds, other, from State of California for miscellaneous design and construction at Hidden Dam. 17. Includes total Code 710 funds for recreation facilities at Isabella Lake: $728,800, -$200,000, and -$10,000 for fiscal years 1978, 1979, and 1980, respectively. Total to date $2,199,085. 18. Includes total Code 710 costs for recreation facilities at Isabella Lake: $76,269, $477,593, and $5,762 for fiscal years 1978, 1979, and 1980, respectively. Total to date $2,199,085. 19. Includes $224,000 Code 713 funds for improvement at Tillie Creek and Live Oak campgrounds for fiscal year 1977. 20. Includes Code 713 costs for improvement at Tillie Creek and Live Oak campgrounds: $83,329 and $84 for fiscal years 1978 and 1979, respectively. Total to date $224,000. 21. Includes $80,000 special recreation use fees at Isabella Lake. 22. Includes $30,000 special recreation use costs at Isabella Lake. 23. Funds from California Department of Boating and Waterways for design and construction of boat launching and related facilities at Old Isabella Road and Isabella Peninsula. 24. Includes Code 710 funds for recreation facilities: Success Lake: $850 for fiscal year 1978. Total to date $747,048. Terminus Dam: No funds after fiscal year 1977. Total to date $700,004. 25. Includes Code 710 costs for recreation facilities: Success Lake: $1,750 for fiscal year 1978. Total to date $747,078. Terminus Dam: $96 for fiscal year 1979. Total to date $700,004. 26. Includes $165,000 special recreation use fees at Success Lake. 35-18 27. Includes $164,719 special recreation use costs at Success Lake. 28. Funds from State of California Department of Boating and Waterways for acquisition of a boarding float at Success (no funds after fiscal year 1977); and at Terminus I)am, $11,000 and $1,420 for fiscal years 1978 and 1979, respectively. 29. Costs for acquisition of boarding float at Success Lake: $27,180 for fiscal year 1978; and at Terminus Dam, $1 and $12,419 for fiscal years 1978 and 1979, respectively. :30. Includes $1,200, initiation of plans and specifications for Code 710( recreation facilities, for fiscal year 1978. Construction of recreation facilities at Martis Creek Lake unlcer Code 710 was determined to be infeasible. 31. In addition, $66,532 expended for new work from contributed funds, other, for miscellaneous construction un(ler local cooperation requirements as related to acquisition of rights-of-way and utility alterations for project. :32. Includes Code 710 funds for recreation facilities at Pine Flat Lake: $735,000, $110,000, and $250,000 for fiscal years 1978, 1979, and 1980, respectively. Total to date $1,595,100. 33. Includes Code 710( costs for recreation facilities at Pine Flat Lake: $69,734, $753,825, and $271,440 for fiscal years 1978, 1979, and 1980, respectively. Total to date $1,595,1)00). 34. Includes Public Works Acceleration, Executive (PL 87-658) (Transfer to Corps of Engineers, Civil) 1963 funds for recreation facilities: Total appropriations $239,235 and total costs $239,235. 35. Includes $19,600 Code 713 funds and costs for Pine Flat fish barrier. 36(. Includes $112,300 special recreation use fees at Pine Flat Lake. :37. Includes $112,300 special recreation use costs at Pine lFlat Lake. 38. Miscellaneous construction and engineering and (lesign services (non-project) accomplished at expense of State of California under local cooperation requirements in connection with acquisition of rights-of-way and utility alterations at Pine Flat Lake. :39. Excludes $614,608 for Table Mountain (Iron Canyon) project, deauthorized August 5, 1977, and $531,000 for Sacramento River and major and minor tributaries portions which are considered inactive and deferred. 40). Includes Code 710 funds for recreation facilities at Black Butte Lake: $355,000, $60,000, and $110,000 for fiscal years 1978, 1979, and 1980, respectively. Total to date $ 1,)000)), 162. 41. Includes Code 710 costs for recreation facilities at Black Butte Lake: $651,854, $51,857, and $212,747, and $2,868 for fiscal years 1978, 1979, 1980, and 1981, respectively. Total to date $1,000,162. 42. Includes $74,100 special recreation use fees at Black lButte Lake. 4:3. Includes $74,100 special recreation use costs at Black Butte Lake. 44. Miscellaneous construction and engineering and lcesign services (non-project) accomplished at expense of State of California under local cooperation requirements in connection with acquisition of rights-of-way and utility alterations (primarily for Sacramento River and major and minor tributaries project). 45. Includes State Highway Commission payment $789,(008, for use of excess excavation from Chico and Mud Creeks and Sandy Gulch (Sacramento River and major and minor tributaries) for freeway embankment through city of Chico. 46iI.n cludes $7,984, contributed funds, other, from State of California for required modification of existing private facilities, Sacramento River, Chico Landing to Red Bluff. 47. Includes $15,977 contributed funds, other, from State of California Department of Boating and Waterways for replacing a boarding float at OrlandButtes boat launching ramp at Black Butte Lake. 48. Excludes funds applicable to other units of this basin authorization (Lower San Joaquin River and tributaries and Tuolumne River Basin, Calif.) (See table 35-J). 49. Includes $110,000 utilized for preparation of 1957 Economic Feasibility Report and of Revised Feasibility Reyport (FY 1960, 1961, and 1962) applicable to 1962 reauthorization of project. TABLE 35-B SACRAMENTO, CALIF., DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 3, 1899 .July 25, 1912 Jan. 21, 1927 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 July 24, 1946 H. Doc. 186, 55th Cong., 2d sess., and 48, 55th Cong., 3d sess. (Annual Report 1898, p. 2844 and 1899, p. 3171). H. Doc. 76, 62d Cong., 1st sess.' H. Doc. 123, 69th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 35, 73d Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 35, 73d Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 142, 79th Cong., 2d sess. SACRAMENTO RIVER, CALIF. (See Section 1 of Text) A depth of 7 feet below Sacramento. For work above Sacramento. The 10-foot channel up to Sacramento. A depth of 6 feet between Sacramento and Colusa and 5 feet between Colusa and Chico Landing, at a cost of $390,000 provided flow of rivers is increased to minimum flow of 5,000 cubic feet per second after Shasta Reservoir is built. Authority for a special direct participation of Federal Government of $12 million in cost of Shasta Reservoir. Transfer of authority for expenditure of above $12 million from Secretary of War to Secretary of the Interior. Modified existing navigation project for Sacramento River, Calif., to provide for construction of a ship channel 30 feet deep and 200 to 300 feet wide from deep water in Suisun Bay to Washington Lake, including such works as may be necessary to compensate for or alleviate any detrimental salinity conditions resulting from ship channel; a triangular basin of equal depth, 2,400 by 2,000 by 3,400 feet at Washington Lake; and connecting channel 13 feet deep and 120 feet wide, with lock and drawbridge, thence to Sacramento River. SACRAMENTO RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, CALIF., FROM COLLINSVILLE TO SHASTA DAM (See Section 19 of Text) Modify Sacramento River Flood Control Project to provide for extensions in levees and other structures along Sacramento River and major and minor tributaries; construct Black Butte Dam and Reservoir; construct low-level Table Mountain Dam and Reservoir with power facilities; and provision of monetary authorization of $15 million for initiation of modification. Improvement for protection of Upper Butte Basin (included full monetary authorization). Extend existing Sacramento River Flood Control Project to Keswick Dam for purposes of zoning area below dam and modification of project by construction of bank protection and incidental channel improvements between Chico Landing and Red Bluff (included full monetary authorization). Additional authorization of $17 million for comprehensive plan approved in act of December 22, 1944. Further modification of Sacramento River Flood Control Project by construction of initial 10-year phase of bank erosion control works and setback levees on Sacramento River and authorization of $14,240,000 for prosecution of modification. Additional authorization of $7 million for bank protection approved in act of July 14, 1960. Initiation of construction of second phase of bank erosion control works and setback levees on Sacramento River as approved in act of July 14, 1960, and additional authorization of $16 million for such purpose.: Deauthorization of Table Mountain Dam and Reservoir 4 1. Contains latest published map of section above Sacramento. For map of section below Sacramento, see H. Doe. 1123, 60th Cong., 2d sess. and S. Doc. 142, 79th Cong., 2d sess. 2. Contains latest published map. 3. Total monetary authorization available, exclusive of preauthorization studies from general investigations approplriations, amounts to $72,740,000. 4. The 90-day Congressional project review period, re(luired by sec. 12, PL 93-251, as amended by sec. 157, PL 94-587, ended August 5, 1977, and resulted in deauthorization of p)roject unit. 35-19 H. Doc. 649, 78th Cong., 2d sess.2 H. Doc. 367, 81st Cong., 1st sess. 2 H. Doc. 272, 84th Cong., 2d sess.2 S. Doc. 103, 80th Cong., 2d sess.2 PL 90-17 PL 93-251 H. Doc. 94-192, 94th Cong., 1st sess. l)Dec. 22, 1944 May 17. 195() .July 3, 1958 July . 1958 .July 11, 196() May 12. 1967 Mar. 7. 1974 .June 19. 1975 TABLE 35-C REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 SACRAMENTO RIVER, CALIF.: TIDAL AND FLOOD CONDITIONS PREVAILING (See Section 1 of Text) Place ('ullinsvillh' Sta(c~ tra'm'aeItnlto('lito \'erona M onuth o' l"(eathetr Itive'r) (( 'oulu1sla1US ('hico Landling lReal IBlu fI' Miles from Mouth of River 59 80 144 193 248 Mean Tidal' 4.3 2.02 Range in Feet Extreme Ordinary Tidal2 Flood: 7 3Trace Trace 8 20 22 26 20 24 1. Mean lo\er low water to mean higher high water. 2. l'i k at IVw water season only. TABLE 35-D ::. Mean lower low water to flood stage. 1. I':xlr i(,ri, lo\\' water to in(licated( flood condlition. SAN JOAQUIN RIVER, CALIF.: TOTAL COST OF NEW WORK FOR PROJECT' (See Section 3 of Text) Federal Non-Federal z Corps of Coast Required Lands and Engineers Guard Cash Damages (includ- Total Modification (Construction) (Construction) Contribution ing Relocations) Total Project Prior to 195) Modification $4,009,938 $80,000 $1,307,500 $1,042,000 $2,349,500 $6,439,438 195()M odification 1,823,179 - 35,000 135,000 170,000 1,993,179 Total $5,833,117 $80,000 $1,342,500 $1,177,000 $2,519,500 $8,432,617 1. Completed in May 1960. 2. Excludes $5,865,000 (Feb. 1954) local interests costs for Stockton Deep Water Channel terminal facilities require( und(er terms of project authorization. TABLE 35-E SAN JOAQUIN RIVER, CALIF.: PROJECT UNITS (1950 MODIFICATION) RECLASSIFIED AND EXCLUDED FROM PROJECT COST (See Section 3 of Text) Non-Federal Federal Required Lands and Corps of Cash Damages (includ- Total Unit Engineers Contribution ing Relocations) Total Project Settling Basin above head of Burns Cutoff' $1,073,000 $ 30,000 $ 200,000 $ 230,000 $1,303,000 Burns Cutoff improvement; new turning basin: dredging Mormon Channel' 7,882,000 431,000 1,455,000 1,886,000 9,768,000 Upper Stockton Channel enlargement 4 535,000 34,000 15,000 49,000 584,000 1. July 1959 price index. Deauthorized August 5, 1977. 2. Deferred; July 1960 price index. 3. For lands and construction. 4. Deleted by 1965 River and Harbor Act authorization of San Francisco Bay to Stockton Channel, Sacramento District, Improvement No. 2. 35-20 Extreme Flood' 10 28 30 32 25 30 ---- SACRAMENTO, CALIF., DISTRICT TABLE 35-F OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Section 5 of Text): For Last Cost to Sept 30, 1981 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Feather River, Calif.' 1951 5,7522 Middle River and Connecting Channels, Calif.' 4 1974 8,354 93,4945 Mokelumne River, Calif.; 1974 8,500 189,152 Navajo Reservoir, New Mex.' 6 - 2,132 Old River, Calif. 1970 23,185 631,128 Stockton and Mormon Channels, Calif.:' 1970 253,151 218,854 Suisun Bay Channel, Calif. '" " '2 1974 200,928 3,316,622" 14 Suisun Channel, Calif.' 1973 217,677 733,48914 15' Suisun Point Channel, Calif. '' 1 1965 191,728 1. Maintenance project, channels adequate for corn- nance was discontinued. No Federal maintenance costs have merce. been incurred since fiscal year 1969. 2. Includes $10 for maintenance for previous project. 10. Includes $58,901 for previous projects. Excludes $6,160 for previous project and $3,840 for existing 11. Excludes $59,551 expended from required contribl) roject for maintenance expended from contributed funds. uted funds for previous project. 3. Completed. 12. Excludes work accomplished under existing project 4. Includes $1,600 for previous project. at a cost of $207,198 from Public Works Administration 5. Includes $790 for previous project. funds allotted to San Joaquin River, Calif. 6. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of 13. Includes $59,817 for previous projects. Excludes sec. 107, Public Law 86-645, as amended. $5,449 expended from required contributed funds for 7. All costs transferred from Los Angeles District in previous project. fiscal year 1968. 14. Maintenance responsibility transferred to San 8. Estimated cost to local interests was $3,600 for lands, Francisco District, January 1, 1974. (lamages, and public landings. 15. Includes reconnaissance and condition surveys of 9. Upon completion of Mormon Slough, Calaveras River, $5,496 and $483 for fiscal years 1963 and 1964, respectively. Calif. in February 1970, local interests accepted mainte- 16. Estimated cost (July 1964) to local interests was nance responsibility for Mormon Slough as well as for $12,000 for lands, damages, and spoil retention dikes. Stockton and Mormon Channels, Calif., and Federal mainte- TABLE 35-G SACRAMENTO RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, CALIF., COLLINSVILLE TO SHASTA DAM: PROJECT UNITS RECLASSIFIED AND EXCLUDED FROM COST ESTIMATE (See Section 19 of Text) Current Estimated Cost Unit Classification Federal Non-Federal Total 1944 Modification: Antelope Creek2 Inactive $1,400,000 $ 340,000 1,740,000 Lower Butte Basin' Deferred 7,286,000 2,285,000 9,571,000 Thomes Creek2 Deferred 1,140,000 140,000 1,280,000 Willow Creek2 Inactive 1,290,000 120,000 1,410,000 Bypass Levees' Deferred 7,100,000 940,000 8,040,000 Bypass Levees' Inactive 3,010,000 - 3,010,000 1950 Modification: Upper Butte Basin2 Deferred 3,530,000 1,787,000 5,317,000 1. For lands and damages, including relocations. 2. July 1960 price level. 3. Excludes work applicable to extension of Moulton weir (July 1954 price level). 4. July 1961 price level. 35-21 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 35-H SACRAMENTO RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, CALIF., FROM COLLINSVILLE TO SHASTA DAM: CONSTRUCTION ACCOMPLISHED AND CONTRACT COSTS (See Section 19 of Text) Required Contract Federal Contributed Total (Contract 33 completion (Bank protection, Sacramento River, miles 15.0-60.0) $134,120 $28,222 $162,342 Contract 34A initiation (boat ramp and parking lot at Elkhorn Park, Sacramento RIiver) 246,991 54,218 301,209 Contract 35 initiation (Bank protection, Sacramento River, miles 110.0-184.0) 1,216,472 267,030 1,483,502 Contract 36 initiation (Bank protection, selected sites, Sacramento River, downstream from Freelxrt) 1,577,274 346,231 1,923,505 35-22 SACRAMENTO, CALIF., DISTRICT TABLE 35-I OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 22 of Text) For Last Cost to Sept 30, 1981 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance American River, Calif.' Aquatic Plant Control, Calif.' Bear River, Calif." Big Dry Creek Dam and diversion, Calif.' Big Wash, Milford, Beaver County, Utah' 4 Burch Creek, Weber County, Utah4 Duck Creek, San Joaquin County, Calif.' 4 Fairfield Vicinity Streams, Calif.8 Folsom Lake, American River, Calif.' 9 Gleason Creek, Nev. 1 Green Valley Creek, Solano County, Calif.' Kays Creek, Utah' 4 12 Kern River-California Aqueduct Intertie, Calif.' 4 .3 Lake Camanche, Calif.' 14 Lakeport Lake, Calif.'" Little Dell Lake, Utah Little Valley Wash, Magna, Utah' 7 Lower San Joaquin River and tributaries, including Tuolumne and Stanislaus Rivers, Calif.' ' Marysville Lake, Calif.' Merced River, Calif.' 2" Middle Creek, Calif.' 21 Mormon Slough, Calif.' New Bullards Bar, Calif.' North Fork, Pit River at Alturas, Calif.' ' Reese River, Battle Mountain, Nev.' 4 Salt Lake City, Jordan River, Utah' Sevier River near Redmond, Utah' Spanish Fork River, Utah'7 Truckee River and tributaries, Calif. and Nev. Walnut Creek, Calif. Weber River and tributaries, Utah: " 1959 1967 1980 1955 1961 1964 1967 1977 1957 1977 1963 1973 1977 1976 1976 1978 1951 1976 1980 1976 1967 1976 1972 1974 1969 1961 1952 1955 1968 1976 1974 $ 2,125,8182 1,000 1,369,9315 217,8796 26,049 664,8257 687,000 63,014,810 215,826 136,0269 11 407,989 1,503,073 10,252,950 2,353,003'6 2,054,900 27,835,263 10,918,796 2,643,499 2,965,40222 12,890,6252: 904,27824 25 133,33926 1,227,57027 919,00028 20,000 1,038,960 29 75,120 1. Completed. 2. Excludes $54,919 other contributed funds for miscellaneous construction for local interests pursuant to requiremenits of local cooperation. Total costs for all requirements of local cooperation were $951,000 (1959), for lands and relocations. 3. Due to infeasibility, Phase I study was suspended and project classified as "inactive" on November 6, 1981. Minor fiscal year 1981 costs, $1,524. 4. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of sec. 205, Public Law 80-858, as amended. 5. Excludes $44,008 other contributed funds for construction in connection with bridge construction pursuant to requirements of local cooperation. Total cost to local interests for all requirements of local cooperatidn was $370,000 (1959) for lands and relocations. 6. Excludes $22,000 for preauthorization studies. 7. Excludes $50,000 for preauthorization studies. Estimated costs to local interests were $665,000 for lands and damages including relocations. 8. Due to lack of local support, project was reclassified as "deferred" on September 15, 1977. 9. Transferred to Bureau of Reclamation in May 1956 for operation and maintenance by that agency in conjunction with other units of Central Valley project. 10. Due to lack of local support, project was reclassified as "deferred" on November 3, 1977. Fiscal year 1978 carryover funds of $27,984 were revoked. 11. Excludes $20,000 for preauthorization studies. 12. Includes $30,000 for preauthorization studies. Estimated costs (fiscal year 1973) to local interests for all requirements of local cooperation were $150,117 for lands and damages including relocations. 13. Includes $73,000 for preauthorization studies. Non- Federal (Kern County Water Agency) cost for road relocation was.$18,260 (required contributed funds). 14. Constructed by East Bay Municipal Utility District. Final Federal contribution of $51,202 made July 18, 1978 (total $10,111,684). Non-Federal costs $24,876,842. 15. Preconstruction planning complete. Necessary reaffirmation of local cooperation assurances by Lake County Flood Control and Water Conservation District not received. Project was reclassified as "deferred" on September 15, 1977. 16. Includes $298,500 costs for advance acquisition of land, Public Law 91-439. 17. Deauthorized. The 90-day Congressional project review period, required by sec. 12, Public Law 93-251, as amended, ended August 5, 1977, and resulted in deauthorization of project. 35-23 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS TABLE 35-I (Cont'd) (See Section 22 of Text) 18. Cherry Valley and New Don Pedro Reservoirs constructed by local interests. Federal contributions of $9,000,000 and $5,464,000, respectively, for flood control reservation. Final Federal contribution of $308,898 was made on January 18, 1972, for New Don Pedro. Excludes $3,004,946, contributed funds, other, for miscellaneous engineering and construction (non-project) at local interests expense under local cooperation requirements for acquisition of rights-of-way for levee and channel improvements on Lower San Joaquin River and tributaries. 19. Planning and any future development is uncertain awaiting State of California's position on support of project. Minor fiscal year 1981 costs, $753. 20. Constructed by Merced Irrigation District. Final Federal contribution of $839 was made December 2, 1975 (total $10,818,638) for flood control reservation. 21. Estimated costs (fiscal year 1967) to local interests for all req(uirements of local cooperation were $1,340,000 for lands and damages including relocations. 22. Non-Federal cost $2,965,402 (fiscal year 1976) for lands and relocations. Federal contribution of $599,336 made to State Reclamation Board. TABLE 35-J 23. Constructed by Yuba County Water Agency. Final Federal contribution of $33,470 was made in fiscal year 1972 (total $12,759,127) for flood control reservation. 24. Includes $41,800 for preauthorization studies. 25. Excludes $146,000 other contributed funds for miscellaneous construction and engineering and design services un(ler local cooperation requirements in connection with acquisition of rights-of-way, relocation, and utility alterations. 26. Includes $19,000 for preauthorization studies. 27. Estimated costs to local interests for all requirements of local coo)peration were $463,000 (July 1962) for lands and (lamages including relocations. 28. Excludes $48,000 required contributed funds toward first cost. Costs to local interests for all requirements of local cooperation, including required contributions, were $118,000 (1951). 29. All costs and construction responsibility transferred to San Francisco District, January 31, 1977. 30. I)ue to lack of local assurances required by sec. 206, Public Law 90-483, 1968 Flood Control Act, project authorization expired as of April 16, 1972, end of 5-year period. SURVEYS (See Section 25 of Text) Fiscal year costs were as follows: Navigation studies $ 6,857 Flood control studies 2,401,148 Coordination with Soil Conservation Service 2,000 Coordination with Bureau of Reclamation pertaining to projects under reclamation program (including PL 984) 10,400 Coordination with other agencies on Truckee, Carson, and Walker River Basins 4,000 $2,424,405 35-24 PACIFIC OCEAN DIVISION* This division comprises the State of Hawaii. The division also performs such actions pertaining to preservation and protection of Navigation IMPROVEMENTS Page 1. Auasi Harbor, American Samoa .................. 36-1 2. Aunuu Harbor, American Samoa .................. 36-1 3. Barbers Point Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii ............... 36-2 4. Hilo Harbor, Hawaii, Hawaii .................. 36-2 5. Honolulu Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii.................... 36-2 6. Kahului Harbor, Maui, Hawaii .................. 36-3 7. Kawaihae Harbor, Hawaii, Hawaii ............... 36-3 8. Kikiaola Small Boat Harbor, Maui, Hawaii.............. ............... 36-3 9. Maalaea Small Boat Harbor, Maui, Hawaii.... .............. .............. 36-3 10. Rota Harbor, Northern Marianas .................. 36-4 11. Tau Small Boat Harbor, American Samoa ................................ 36-4 12. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys ..................... .................... 36-4 13. Other Authorized Navigation Projects .......... ....................... 36-4 14. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization .................................... 36-4 Beach Erosion Control 15. Kekaha Beach, Kauai, Hawaii.... ............. 36-4 16. Kualoa Regional Park, Oahu, Hawaii .............. 36-4 17. Sand Island, Oahu, Hawaii ..................... 36-5' navigable waters on and about the island of Guam and American Samoa as provided for under River and Harbor Act of 1899. Beach Erosion Control (Cont.) Page 18. Inspection of Completed Beach Erosion Projects ......................................... 36-5 19. Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects .... .............. ................... 36-5 20. Beach Erosion Control Work Under Special Authorization ............................ 36-5 Flood Control 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. Iao Stream, Maui, Hawaii ......................... 36-5 Kahoma Stream, Maui, Hawaii ................... 36-5 Kaneohe-Kailua Area, Oahu, Hawaii ............... 36-5 Namo River, Territory of Guam ............... 36-6 Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ............. ..... ............. 36-6 Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ......................................... 36-6 Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ..................... ............... 36-6 Work Under Special Authorization ................ 36-6 General Investigations 29. Surveys ................................. 36-6 30. Collection and Study of Basic Data ................. 36-6 31. Hydrologic Studies ............. ............ 36-6 Navigation 1. AUASI HARBOR, AMERICAN SAMOA Location. On the southeast end of Tutuila Island in American Samoa which is about 2,300 miles southwest of Hawaii, 1,500 miles northeast of Auckland, New Zealand and 80 miles southeast of Western Samoa. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 4190.) Existing project. Project provides for an entrance channel 360 feet long, 80 feet wide and 10 feet deep; a turning basin 230 feet long, 100 feet wide and 8 feet deep; a breakwater 125 feet long; an exterior revetment 165 feet long; an east jetty 100 feet long; a west jetty 450 feet long; and appurtenant aids to navigation. The range of tide between mean low water and mean high water is 2.5 feet. Estimated project cost is $1,170,500 of which $1,083,900 (including $47,100 in Coast Guard cost) is federal cost and $86,600 is non-federal cost. Project authority is Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended. Project was approved for construction in June 1978. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. A construction contract, combined with Aunuu Harbor, was awarded in September 1978 and completed in April 1981 for $1,510,244 with ten modifications. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is not financially completed. 2. AUNUU HARBOR, AMERICAN SAMOA Location. On the north coast of Aunuu island in American Samoa which is about 2,300 miles southwest of Hawaii, 1,500 miles northeast of Auckland, New Zealand, and 80 miles southeast of Western Samoa. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 4190.) Existing project. Project provides for an entrance channel 175 feet long, 70 feet wide and 14 feet deep; a turning area of 7,500 square feet and 14 feet deep; a northern revetted mole 300 feet long; a wave absorber 200 feet long; a stub breakwater 90 feet long; a southern revetted mole 220 feet long; a mooring area of 13,500 square feet and 8 feet deep; and appurtenant aids to navigation. Range of tide between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 2.5 feet. Estimated project cost is $2,025,000 of which $1,793,600 (including $10,500 in Coast Guard cost) is federal cost and $231,400 is non-federal cost. Project authority is Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended. Project was approved for construction in June 1976. *All cost and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 36-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. A construction contract, combined with Auasi Harbor, was awarded in September 1978 and completed in April 1981 for $1,238,428 with ten modifications. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is not financially completed. 3. BARBERS POINT HARBOR, OAHU, HAWAII Location. On the west coast of Oahu, about 25 miles from metropolitan Honolulu. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 4110 and 4133.) Existing project. Deep-draft harbor provides for an entrance channel 4,280 feet long, 450 feet wide and 38 to 42 feet deep; and inshore harbor basin of about 92 acres and 38 feet deep; and 4,700 feet long wave absorber. Light-draft harbor provides for a main access channel 1,200 feet long, 80-140 feet wide, and 12 feet deep; and wave absorber 300 feet long. Plane of reference is mean lower low water datum. The mean tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water level is 1.8 feet; extreme range under normal condition is 2.3 feet. Approved project cost estimate (October 1981) is $66,600,000 of which $58,300,000 (including $400,000 for Coast Guard cost) is federal cost and $8,300,000 is non-federal cost, including lands and rights-of-way and cash contribution. (See Table 36-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must provide lands and rights-of-way for construction and future maintenance, provide and maintain mooring facilities and utilities open to all on equal terms; provide such utility and drainage relocations or alterations as necessary; hold the United States free from damages; and provide a cash contribution estimated to be $2,500,000 for the deep-draft harbor. Terminal facilities. Existing privately owned barge harbor consists of a concrete marginal wharf, 250 feet long along south side of the barge basin. An offshore tanker facility is connected to the oil refinery by pipelines. Operations and results during fiscal year. Post authorization change report pending approval which includes a change in cash contribution to 4.4 percent from 2.1 percent. The State of Hawaii has agreed to a voluntary contribution of 4.4 percent based on the increased volume and value of the dredged material from the construction of the harbor. Rights-of-way required for project construction was completed in August 1981. Condition at end of fiscal year. Preconstruction planning for light-draft harbor deferred since FY 1970 as requested by the State of Hawaii. A favorable bid was received in August 1981 for construction of the Barbers Point deep-draft harbor but due to non-responsiveness of the low bid contractor award is pending. OCE authorized the award of the construction contract to the second low bidder in December 1981, but award is still pending due to protest received from low bidder, Peter Kiewit Sons Company. A favorable construction contract bid for the Regional Visitor Center was received in September 1981, but award is also pending award resolution on Barbers Point Harbor. The construction contract for the Regional Visitor Center at Fort DeRussy will include repair of roof utilizing military funds. Construction contract awards for both are anticipated by the second quarter, FY 1982. 4. HILO HARBOR, HAWAII, HAWAII Location. On the northeast coast of the island of Hawaii in the city of Hilo. (See NOAA Chart 19324.) Existing project. Completed portion of project comprises of a rubblemound breakwater 10,080 feet long, an entrance 35 feet deep, and a harbor basin 1,400 feet wide, 2,300 feet long and 35 feet deep. The modification of the project authorized by the River and Harbor Acts of 1960 and 1962 was deauthorized in 1977. Range of tides between mean lower low water and mean high water is 2.4 feet and extreme tidal range under normal conditions is 5.4 feet. (See Table 36-B for Authorization Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Three piers, and pipelines for petroleum products, liquid fertilizer and molasses, owned by the state, and privately owned facilities for handling bulk commodities and for storage of sugar, molasses, petroleum products and liquid fertilizer. Equipment includes heavy-lift cranes. Facilities are open to all on equal terms and considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. A construction contract for breakwater repair was awarded in September 1980 and completed in September 1981 for $1,538,800 utilizing Operations and Maintenance, General funds. Project condition survey was completed in July 1981 for $7,893. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is not financially completed. 5. HONOLULU HARBOR, OAHU, HAWAII Location. On the southern coast of the island of Oahu, in the city of Honolulu. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 4109.) Existing project. Completed portion of project comprises three channels 35-40 feet deep, two harbor basins 35 feet deep, and a double-leaf-bascule bridge. Last full report on this project is on page 1828 and 1829 of Annual Report for 1962. Uncompleted portion provides deepening seaward 3,600 feet of Fort Armstrong entrance channel to 45 feet, deepening main harbor basin and Kapalama Channel to 40 feet; widening Kapalama Channel by 60 feet along Sand Island side for 3,100 feet; and relocating project line to provide a 100-foot offset from pierheads in Kapalama Channel and at piers 9, 10 and 11, and an offset of 50 to 75 feet elsewhere in the harbor. The mean tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 1.9 feet. The usual extreme range is 2.3 feet. Project cost estimate (October 1981) for new work is $7,820,800 of which $7,615,100 is federal cost and $205,700 is non-federal cost. (See Table 36-B for Authorizing Legislation:) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 34 piers and 2 marginal wharves, which include 3 piers and 1 marginal wharf owned by the federal government; 13 piers and 1 marginal wharf owned by the State of Hawaii; and 18 piers State owned. All non-federal piers are open to all on an equal basis, although certain ones are reserved for passenger terminals, for container ships or for handling specific bulk commodities such as petroleum products, pineapple, sugar, animal feed, and cement. Operations and results during fiscal year. A construction contract was awarded in February 1979 and completed in March 1981 for $3,560,300 with 6 modifications. Project condition survey was completed in August 1981 for $19,445. Condition at end offiscal year. Construction contract is completed. The contractor submitted 4 claims for changed conditions during prosecution of the work of which 3 have been settled for a total of $2,546,000 for (1) Kapalama Basin: $1,057,000; (2) Kapalama Channel: $385,000 and (3) Main Turning Basin: $1,104,000. The fourth claim is still pending for Fort Armstrong Channel with contractor claim of $2,448,000. 36-2 PACIFIC OCEAN DIVISION* 6. KAHULUI HARBOR, MAUI, HAWAII Location. On the northern coast of the island of Maui, at the town of Kahului. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 4124.) Existing project. Rubblemound breakwaters on east and west sides of harbor, approximately 2,766 and 2,315 feet long, respectively, and an entrance 600 feet wide between breakwaters and a harbor basin 2,050 feet wide, 2,400 feet long, and 35 feet deep. Range of tide between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 2.2 feet and extreme tidal range under normal conditions is 4.5 feet. (See Table 36-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Two wharves owned and operated by State of Hawaii which are open to shipping on equal terms. Pipelines for fuel oil, distillate, kerosene, gasoline, molasses, and water are available. There is also a bulk-sugar plant of 30,000-ton storage capacity with a conveyor loading system capable of conveying at a rate of about 750 tons per hour. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preparation of a General Design Memorandum was initiated in FY 1980 and completed in September 1981 utilizing Operation and Maintenance, General Funds. Project condition survey was completed in August 1981 for $20,424. Condition at end of fiscal year. Major rehabilitation cost is estimated to be $6,300,000 which includes estimated inflation allowance from 1 October 1981 through the construction period. Construction contract award is scheduled in May 1982. 7. KAWAIHAE HARBOR, HAWAII, HAWAII Location. On northwestern coast of island of Hawaii, in town of Kawaihae. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 4176.) Existing project. Completed portion comprises of an entrance channel 3,270 feet long; widens from 500 feet at the seaward end to 520 feet within a distance of 2,100 feet then flaring to the basin width of 1,450 feet. Entrance channel is 40 feet deep for the seaward 2,900 feet and transitions to a 35-foot depth at the harbor basin end; a harbor basin 1,450 feet wide, 1,750 feet long on northeast side, 1,050 feet long on southwest side and 35 feet deep; and a rubblemound breakwater with maximum crest elevation 13 feet above mean lower low water and 2,650 feet long. Uncompleted portion provides for constructing a small boat harbor with west revetted mole extension 375 feet long and east revetted mole 1,050 feet long; an offshore island 650 feet long with an average width of 175 feet; an interior mole 850 feet long; wave absorber 400 feet long; and an access channel 640 feet long, 80 feet wide and 8 feet deep. Project TUGBOAT undertaken by Nuclear Cratering Group as a research experiment of chemical explosive excavation was completed in June 1971, which provided an entrance channel 850 feet long, 120 feet wide and 12 feet deep; a turning basin 200 feet by 200 feet, 12 feet deep, and a breakwater 850 feet long, small boat harbor. Range of tide between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 2.1 feet, and extreme range under ordinary conditions is 4.5 feet. Approved project cost (October 1981) for small boat harbor is $2,590,000 of which $1,400,000 (including $10,000 Coast Guard cost) is federal cost and $1,190,000 is non-federal cost. (See Table 36-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Completed portion fully complied with. For small boat harbor, local interests must provide all lands, easements and rights-of-way for construction and subsequent maintenance; provide and maintain necessary berthing and mooring areas, installations and utilities, including a public landing with suitable supply facilities; accomplish without cost to the United States such utility, drainage, and other relocations or alterations as necessary; and provide a cash contribution estimated to be $1,190,000. Terminal facilities. A 605-foot concrete wharf and 12,000- square foot pier shed accommodates transpacific commerce; and a 410-foot long, 40-foot wide apron, and 3,600-square foot pier shed accommodates interisland tugs and barges including livestock. Other facilities also open to all on equal basis are considered adequate for existing commerce, include a 20,000-ton capacity bulk sugar storage building, 10,000-ton molasses storage tank, petroleum tanks of 1.2 million gallon capacity and aqua ammonia tanks of three-quarter million gallon capacity. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preparation of plans and specifications for the small boat harbor was initiated in FY 1981 and discontinued in February 1981 based on priority change by the State of Hawaii on construction start to FY 1985 from FY 1983. Project condition survey for the Deep-Draft Harbor was completed in July 1981 for $9,958. Condition at the end of fiscal year. Preconstruction planning for the Small Boat Harbor is 80 percent complete. 8. KIKIAOLA SMALL BOAT HARBOR, KAUAI, HAWAII Location. Kikiaola is in the Waimea-Koloa judicial district on the island of Kauai. (See NOAA Chart 19386.) Existing project. Project provides for an entrance channel 725 feet long, 105-205 feet wide, 12 feet deep; a main access channel 320 feet long, 70-105 feet wide, 8 feet deep; remove 150 feet of existing breakwater; a modified east breakwater 820 feet long with crest elevation of 11 to 12 feet; a modified west breakwater 220 feet long with crest elevation of 8 feet; and appurtenant aids to navigation. Range of tide between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 1.7 feet, and extreme tidal range is 4.0 feet. Approved project cost estimate (October 1981) is $2,090,000 of which $1,030,000 (including $20,000 for Coast Guard cost) is federal cost and $1,060,000 is non-federal cost, including lands and rights-of-way and cash contribution. (See Table 36-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interest must provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way for construction and subsequent maintenance; provide and maintain berthing or mooring facilities and utilities, and all appropriate onshore facilities necessary to insure complete and adequate project; accomplish without cost to the United States such utility, drainage, or other relocations or alterations as necessary; and provide a cash contribution estimated to be $1,000,000. Terminal facilities. Existing dock and launching ramp owned by the State of Hawaii are open to all on an equal basis. Operations and results during fiscal year. The General Design Memorandum and Final Environmental Impact Statement was completed in September 1980 and OCE approval received in September 1981. Condition at end of fiscal year. Preconstruction planning is 80 percent complete. 9. MAALAEA SMALL BOAT HARBOR, MAUI, HAWAII Location. Maalaea Harbor is on the northwest shore of Maalaea Bay on the island of Maui. (See NOAA Chart 19350.) Existing project. The project provides for an entrance channel 610 feet long, 150-180 feet wide, 12-15 feet deep; a main access channel 720 feet long, 80 feet wide, 8 feet deep; a turning basin with an area of 1.7 acres, 12 feet deep; a 620 feet extension to south breakwater; removal of 80 feet of the east breakwater; and appur- 36-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 tenant aids to navigation. Tree planting for beautification. Range of tide between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 2.2 feet, and extreme tidal range under normal conditions is 4.0 feet. Approved project cost estimate (October 1981) is $6,560,000 of which $4,240,000 (including $20,000 for Coast Guard cost) is federal cost and $2,320,000 is non-federal cost. (See Table 36-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way for construction and subsequent maintenance; provide and maintain berthing or mooring facilities and utilities, and all appropriate onshore facilities necessary to insure complete and adequate project; accomplish without cost to the United States such utility, drainage, or other relocations or alterations as necessary; and provide a cash contribution estimated to be $2,320,000. Terminal facilities. Existing launch ramp, berthing facilities, loading docks, ice house and fuel facilities owned by the State of Hawaii are open to all on an equal basis. Operations and results during fiscal year. Coordination with National Marine Fisheries Service continuing on Humpback whales for compliance with Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973. Condition at end of fiscal year. Preconstruction planning is 80 percent complete. 10. ROTA HARBOR, NORTHERN MARIANAS Location. On the island of Rota within the commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands which is located in the Western Pacific, approximately 3,820 miles west of Hawaii and approximately 40 miles north of Guam. (See U.S. Defense Mapping Agency Hydrographic Map No. 81063.) Existing project. The project provides for an entrance channel 800 feet long, 300 feet wide, 20 feet deep; a turning basin 400 feet long, 200-400 feet wide, 16.5 feet deep; a revetted mole 500 feet long, 10 feet high; a basin extension 250 feet long, 150 feet wide, 16.5 feet deep; and appurtenant aids to navigation. Range of tide between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 2.4 feet. Project first cost is $2,930,000 of which $2,060,000 (includes $60,000 in Coast Guard cost) is federal cost and $870,000 is nonfederal cost. Project authority is Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended. Project was approved for construction in October 1980. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There is an existing 144 feet long concrete dock at the West Harbor. Presently cargo is lightened from offshore of West Harbor by a U.S. Government surplus LCM which is able to navigate the narrow and shallow entrance at high tide and off-load at the existing concrete dock. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preparation of plans specifications was initiated in FY 1981. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction to be initiated upon availability of local cooperation funds and federal funds. 11. TAU SMALL BOAT HARBOR, AMERICAN SAMOA Location. On the island of Tau, American Samoa, about 2,300 miles southwest of Hawaii, 1,236 miles northwest of Tahiti, and 80 miles southeast of Western Samoa. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 4190.) Existing project. Project provides for a 520-foot long entrance channel, 130 feet wide, 16 feet deep; a turning basin of 85,000 square feet, 14 feet deep; a rubble breakwater 290 feet long, 13 feet high; revetments with a total length of 975 feet; and a 200-foot long groin. Plane of reference is mean sea level. The range of tide between mean low water and mean high water is 2.5 feet. Project first cost is $1,567,500 of which $1,515,100 (including $4,800 in Coast Guard cost) is federal cost and $52,400 is non-federal cost. Project authority is Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended. Project was approved for construction in January 1975. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Construction contract completed in December 1980 for $1,667,828 with 2 modifications. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is not financially completed. Contractor claim for different site conditions is pending. 12. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS See Table 36-C. 13. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS See Table 36-D. 14. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigational Activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (Preauthorization). Preauthorization studies completed on Agat Harbor, Guam, $27,728; Kaulana Bay Harbor, Hawaii, $78,441; Rota Harbor, Mariana Islands, $906; Saipan Small Boat Harbor, Saipan, $9,676; Saipan Deep-Draft Harbor, Saipan, $10,000; and study deferred on Kane-Kai Small Boat Harbor, Oahu, $41. Beach Erosion Control 15. KEKAHA BEACH, KAUAI, HAWAII Location. On the Southwest coast of the island of Kauai near the town of Kekaha, Kauai. (See NOAA Chart 19381.) Existing project. Project provides for a 5,900-foot long rubble revetment with a crest elevation of 12 feet mean lower low water and a slope of 1 vertical to 1.5 horizontal. Total project cost is $2,672,520 of which $999,996 is federal cost and $1,672,524 is non-federal cost. Project authority is Section 103a of 1962 River and Harbor Act, as amended. Project was approved for construction in July 1978. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. The project was financially completed as of December 1980. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project completed. 16. KUALOA REGIONAL PARK, OAHU, HAWAII Location. On the northeast coast of the island of Oahu, about 20 miles from downtown Honolulu, Oahu. (See NOAA Chart 19359.) Existing project. Project provides for an initial beach fill of 45,000 cubic yards of beach sand with a berm width of 50 feet, a berm elevation between 4.5 to 6.5 feet mean lower low water and a foreshore slope of about 1 vertical to 8 horizontal. Periodic nourishment is estimated to be 18,000 cubic yards once every four years. Project first cost (1979) is $637,800 of which $470,500 is federal cost and $167,300 is non-federal cost. Project authority is Section 103a of the 1962 River and Harbor Act, as amended. Project was approved for construction in June 1978. 36-4 PACIFIC OCEAN DIVISION Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Settlement agreement on termination costs signed conditionally by contractor in February 1981. Final contracting officers decision issued to contractor denying claim in its entirety in July 1981. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project terminated but not financially completed. 17. SAND ISLAND, OAHU, HAWAII Location. Sand Island lies adjacent to Honolulu Harbor on the south coast of Oahu. Sand Island, approximately 520 acres in area, is connected to the island of Oahu by a bascule bridge. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 4109.) Existing project. Project provides for 2,382-foot revetment with crest elevation +6 to +8 and slope 1 on 1 to 1 on 1.5, stone size of 400 to 3,000 pounds. Total project cost is $557,607 of which $301,879 is federal cost and $255,728 is non-federal cost. Project authority is Section 103a of 1962 River and Harbor Act, as amended. Project was approved for construction in May 1979. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Construction contract completed in October 1980 for $436,902 with one modification. Project financially completed as of April 1981. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project completed. 18. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS Inspection and survey was conducted on Kaaawa Beach in September 1981 at a total cost of $577. 19. OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS See Table 36-E. 20. BEACH EROSION CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Beach erosion control activities pursuant to Section 103, Public Law 87-874 (Preauthorization). Preauthorization study initiated on Kahaluu Beach Park, Hawraii, $70,509; study completed on Kaaawa Beach, Oahu, $9; and study terminated on Kamaole Beach Park, Maui, $77,584. Flood Control 21. IAO STREAM, MAUI, HAWAII Location. Iao Stream on the island of Maui drains a portion of the slopes of the West Maui mountains, and its lower course runs into the sea just to the east of the town of Wailuku, Maui. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 4124.) Existing project. Project provides for a debris basin 2.5 miles upstream of stream mouth; channel improvement from the debris basin to about 1,100 feet downstream of Market Street bridge; diversion levees and flood plain management from the channel improvements for about 1,400 feet downstream of Waiehu bridge. The standard project design discharge is 26,500 cubic feet per second at the stream mouth. Project cost estimate is $12,630,000 of which $12,030,000 is federal cost and $600,000 is non-federal cost for lands and relocations. (See Table 36-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Construction contract was completed in May 1981 for $11,002,881 with 30 modifications. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is not financially completed. Contractor claim for damage to work and delay due to floodings in 1978 and 1979 is pending. 22. KAHOMA STREAM, MAUI, HAWAII Location. Kahoma Stream drainage basin is located in Lahaina, Maui. Lahaina is on the west coast of Maui about 4 miles from Kaanapali. The drainage basin of Kahoma Stream totals 5.3 square miles. (See U.S. Geological Survey Chart, Lahaina.) Existing project. The project provides for a debris basin with 120 feet maximum based width and a capacity of 55,000 cubic yards; a concrete trapezoidal channel 5,415 feet long; three concrete bridges with a clear span of 60 feet; and a revetted outlet extending 70 feet seaward of the river mouth. Approved project cost estimate (October 1981) is $21,500,000 of which $16,300,000 is federal cost and $5,200,000 is non-federal cost for lands, damages and relocations. (See Table 36-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must provide all lands, easements, and rights-of-way; provide without cost to the United States all relocation of building and utilities, highway and street bridges and driveways, railroad track and bridge, and other related facilities which may be required for construction of the project; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works; maintain and operate all the works after completion; and prohibit encroachment on improved channels and debris basin. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning was continued in FY 1981. Model study by Waterway Experiment Station is 90 percent complete. Phase II General Design Memorandum was completed in June 1981. Condition at end of fiscal year. Approval of General Design Memorandum by Chief of Engineers pending. Preconstruction planning is 70 percent complete. 23. KANEOHE-KAILUA AREA, OAHU, HAWAII Location. Kamooalii-Kaneohe Stream drainage basin is on the east coast of the island of Oahu. The drainage basin is bounded on west and south by the Koolau Mountain Range, on the east by the remnants of Kaneohe volcanic cone and on the north by Kaneohe Bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 4134 and U.S. Geological Survey quadrangles Kaneohe, Hawaii and Honolulu, Hawaii.) Existing project. Project provides for a dam and reservoir about 3.2 miles above the mouth of Kaneohe Stream on the tributary Kamooalii Stream. Project consists of an earth-fill dam 80 feet high, with a crest length of about 2,300 feet, and about 1,274 feet of channel improvements, a concrete side channel and chute spillway and reservoir with storage of 2,500 acre-feet, of which 500 acre-feet would be for sediment reserve and recreation use and 2,000 acre-feet for flood control. Approved project cost estimate (October 1977) is $23,800,000 of which $17,800,000 is federal cost (appropriation required $21,400,000) and $6,000,000 is nonfederal cost for lands, damages and relocations. Future nonfederal reimbursement is $2,600,000. (See Table 36-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Phase II construction contract completed in June 1981 for $13,847,226 with 96 36-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 modifications. Project transferred to local cooperation in May 1981. Preparation of Operation and Maintenance Manual initiated in FY 81 and is scheduled for completion in FY 1982. Condition at end of fiscal year. Final determination of local share of construction cost in progress. 24. NAMO RIVER, TERRITORY OF GUAM Location. The Agat-Santa Rita River (Namo) is on the west coast of the island of Guam and about 10 miles southerly of Agana, the capital city of Guam. The island of Guam is approximately 3,800 miles west of Honolulu, Hawaii, and 1,500 miles south of Tokyo, Japan. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 4196.) Existing project. Provides for channel improvements for the lower 2,000-foot reach of the river, and flood plain management for the area extending from the upper part of the channel improvement to the existing Agat-Santa Rita bridge. Channel improvements include realignment and enlargement of the existing river, lining the channel with riprap, providing a stub outlet channel on the upstream side of Route 2 bridge, and constructing a levee on the north bank of unnamed tributary. Total project cost is $2,364,855 in federal cost. Project authority is Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended. Project was approved for construction in January 1975. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. A construction contract claim was settled in May 1981. A storm drain modification contract was awarded in May 1981 and completed in September 1981 for $30,688. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is not financially completed. 25. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspections were conducted on Hanapepe River Flood Protection Works, Kauai; Wailoa Stream Flood Protection Project, Hawaii, in October 1980; Kaunakakai Stream Flood Protection Works, Molokai; Kuliouou Stream Flood Protection Works, Oahu; and Kawainui Swamp Flood Protection Works, Oahu; at a cost of $5,873. 26. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See Table 36-F. 27. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (Preauthorization). Preauthorization study initiated on Paauau Stream, Hawaii, $73,300; studies completed on Asan Village, Guam, $25,586; Lake Susupe, Saipan, $42,782; Waimea River, Kauai, $11,579; Inarajan River, Guam, $7,500; Geus (Merizo) River, Guam, $7,500; Ylig River, Guam, $7,500; Kalauao Stream, Oahu, $5,000; and studies terminated on Garapan Area, Saipan, $6,646; Palai 4-Mile Creek, Hawaii, $3,899. 28. WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress and antecedent legislation). Federal cost for fiscal year was $639,743 of which $99,049 was for disaster preparedness, $6,274 for emergency operations and $534,420 for rehabilitation. Emergency bank protection (Section 14 of 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Congress). See Table 36-G. General Investigations 29. SURVEYS Survey cost for fiscal year was $1,591,544 of which $816,971 was for navigation, $526,226 for flood damage prevention, $12,004 for review of authorized projects, and $236,343 for coordination studies with other agencies. 30. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA National Program Inspection of Dams cost was $111,983 and Flood Plain Management Services was $225,251 of which $83,225 was for technical services, $110,036 for flood plain management services unit, $31,990 for flood plain management planning. 31. HYDROLOGIC STUDIES Storm studies cost was $7,993. 36-6 PACIFIC OCEAN DIVISION TABLE 36-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 Sept. 30, 1981 1. Auasi Harbor, American Samoa (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 2. Aunuu Harbor, American Samoa (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 3. Barbers Point Harbor, Oahu Hawaii (Federal Funds) 4. Hilo Harbor, Hawaii, Hawaii (Federal Funds) 5. Honolulu Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 6. Kahului Harbor Maui, Hawaii (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 7. Kawaihae Harbor, Hawaii, Hawaii (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost 462,794 20,000 391,100 110,000 1,036,794 33,664 430,930 137,662 378,029 1,033,285 95,000 - - 57,282 -8,437 5,409 23,544 86,563 86,235 294,000 793,000 696,000 -80,000 1,783,129 41,038 696,166 675,480 290,316 1,783,129 233,000 37,929 -1,563 49,600 137,319 231,437 224,848 25,000 333,000 238,500 500,000 1,690,178 31,952 180,951 309,049 422,970 1,530,354 - 5,423,440 - 5,423,440 - - 1,163,000 601,700 3,686,033 - - 62,063 1,641,922 3,625,318 - 2,500,000 1,273,521 2,480,000 14,898,395 - 531,413 2,379,441 3,142,126 14,697,854 37,000 39,442 - 2,038,271 - 2,038,271 - 171,199 - 158,489 171,199 158,489 - 2,388,693 - 2,388,693 325,000 329,745 90,000 - 107,000 6,738,020 76,859 119,572 6,737,451 30,200 30.200 - 11,000 5,983,501 - 11,000 5,983,501 - - 61,800 - - 61,800 62,102 62,102 36-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 36-A (Cont.) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 Sept. 30, 1981 8. Kikiaola Small Boat Harbor, Kauai, Hawaii (Federal Funds) 9. Maalaea Small Boat Harbor, Maui, Hawaii (Federal Funds) 10. Rota Harbor, Northern Marianas 11. Tau Small Boat Harbor, American Samoa (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 15. Kekaha Beach Kauai, Hawaii (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 16. Kualoa Regional Park, Oahu, Hawaii (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 17. Sand Island, Oahu, Hawaii (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 21. Iao Stream, Maui, Hawaii (Federal Funds) 22. Kahoma Stream, Maui, Hawaii (Federal Funds) 23. Kaneohe-Kailua Area, Oahu, Hawaii (Federal Funds) 24. Namo River, Guam (Federal Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost - 50,000 143,000 - 49,940 142,210 - 65,000 130,000 - 64,971 129,825 7,000 80,000 2,500 7,000 78,478 4,009 853,000 - 10,000 922,874 -40,061 52,450 - 50,400 - 931,500 - 22,509 778,761 57 130,304 - 95,000 1,593,400 - - 1,667,437 45,072 39,000 20,749 18,300 - 167,300 10,690 114,913 39,100 26,587 - 401,000 New Work: Approp. 5,000,000 4,205,000 Cost 2,598,994 2,877,168 New Work: Approp. Cost 311,400 239,628 10,000 96,001 161,600 230,199 365,565 850 204 70,000 63,308 193,000 193,000 195,000 195,000 159,500 152,795 - - 1,510,266 72,376 121,917 1,510,169 1,840 26 52,450 52,296 999,996 999,996 -15,876 1,672,524 5,087 1,672,524 -120,000 -3,203 22,059 -21,324 -1,480 35,435 355,472 355,472 177,300 118,060 301,879 301,879 401,000 401,000 310,000 903,000 11,753,000 3,695,735 1,271,121 11,658,705 - 230,000 225,000 239,000 - 229,170 213,603 233,317 New Work: Approp. 9,765,240 1,474,000 Cost 6,495,122 4,073,540 New Work: Approp. Cost 617,000 484,113 1,611,229 694,000 676,090 260,000 705,000 24,629,900 2,876,368 987,547 24,597,629 62,000 61,410 29,000 2,416,314 87,363 2,406,869 36-8 PACIFIC OCEAN DIVISION TABLE 36-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Oct. 27, 1965 Mar. 2, 1907 July 25, 1912 Mar. 3, 1925 Mar. 3, 1905 Aug. 8, 1917 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935; included in Public Works Administration program Sept. 6, 1933 July 24, 1946 Sept. 3, 1954 Oct. 27, 1965 June 25, 1910 July 27, 1916 Jan. 21, 1927 July 14, 1960 BARBERS POINT HARBOR, OAHU, HAWAII (See Section 3 of Text) An entrance channel 42 feet deep, 450 feet wide, and 3,100 feet long; an inshore basin of about 46 acres, 28 feet deep, a breakwater on the north side of the entrance channel, if model study shows it to be necessary; spending beaches with wave absorbers within the harbor totaling 1,320 feet in length; and a main access channel 12 feet deep, 80 feet wide, and 1,200 feet long to a small-boat harbor on the west side of the deep-draft harbor to be developed by local interests. HILO HARBOR, HAWAII, HAWAII (See Section 4 of Text) For rubblemound breakwater. Dredging entrance of Kuhio Bay without increasing original limit of cost. Extension of the breakwater and dredging in the bay. HONOLULU HARBOR, OAHU, HAWAII (See Section 5 of Text) Deepening to 35 feet the inner harbor with a general width of 1,200 feet and casing the curve between the entrance channel and the inner harbor. For the channel 1,000 feet long. Channel connecting Honolulu Harbor and Kapalama Basin. Enlarging entrance channel to present project dimensions, widening of the harbor basin by 320 feet and the maintenance of the improved 400-foot wide portion of the reserved channel. A depth of 35 feet over the full width of 600 feet throughout the reserved channel; a turning basin in Kapalama Basin 35 feet deep by 1,000 feet wide and 3,000 feet long; and a slip of like depth 1,000 feet long on the easterly side of Pier 39. The second entrance channel; and installation of a moveable-type bridge across the 2nd entrance channel. (Modified by the Chief of Engineers.) Reopening Fort Armstrong entrance channel to 45 feet, Main Harbor Basin and Kapalama Channel to 40 feet, and relocating existing project lines. KAHULUI HARBOR, MAUI, HAWAII (See Section 6 of Text) Extending east breakwater and dredging the basin. For the west breakwater. Extend both breakwaters and enlarge dredged basin. Enlarge harbor basin, 600 feet wide, 2,500 feet long, 35 feet deep. H. Doc. 93, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 407, 59th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 417, 62d Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 235, 68th Cong., 1st sess. Annual Report, 1905, p. 2565. H. Doc. 392, 64th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 753, 69th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 54, 73rd Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 705, 79th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 717, 81st Cong., 2nd sess. (Contains latest published map.) H. Doc. 93, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 593, 61st Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 1330, 62nd Cong., 3rd sess. H. Doc. 235, 69th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 109, 86th Cong., 1st sess. (Contains latest map.) 36-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 36-B (Cont.) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents May 17, 1950 Oct. 27, 1965 Aug. 13, 1968 Aug. 13, 1968 KAWAIHAE HARBOR, HAWAII, HAWAII (See Section 7 of Text) Provide for a basin 35 feet deep below mean lower low water and 1,250 feet square with an entrance channel 40 feet deep, 400 feet wide, and approximately 2,900 feet long extending northwestward to deep water in the ocean, and a protective breakwater about 4,400 feet long with a maximum crest elevation 13 feet above mean lower low water, of which the seaward 3,200 feet shall be protected by heavy stone revetment. Widening the entrance channel to 500 feet at the outer end tapering to the existing 520-foot width at the inner end; enlarging the deep-draft basin by widening by a maximum of 200 feet and lengthening by a maximum of 500 feet; extending the existing breakwater by 750 feet if the need is demonstrated by hydraulic model tests; constructing a wave absorber 1,075 feet long at the inner end of the deep-draft basin; dredging the boat harbor access channel, 900 feet long, 80 to 100 feet wide, and 8 to 10 feet deep, for a small boat basin at the inner end of the harbor, protected by the proposed wave absorber; and constructing a protective mole 190 feet long. KIKIAOLA SMALL BOAT HARBOR, KAUAI, HAWAII (See Section 8 of Text) An entrance channel 1,050 feet long, 12 feet deep, 120 feet wide; access channel 630 feet long, width varies from 120 feet to 80 feet, depth varies from 10 feet to 6 feet, remove 130 feet east breakwater, 770 feet of east breakwater raised 3 feet; and wave absorber 270 feet long. Tree planting for beautification. MAALAEA SMALL BOAT HARBOR, MAUI, HAWAII (See Section 9 of Text) An entrance channel 780 feet long, 150 feet wide, 15 feet deep; 150-foot long transition area providing change in depth from 15 feet to 12 feet and flaring of width from 150 feet to about 300 feet at entrance of 6.9-acre turning basin; main access channel 80 feet wide, 700 feet long, 8 feet deep, a 650-foot extension to south breakwater; removal of east breakwater from station 2+00 to its seaward terminus; reinforcing new head with a layer of armor stone. Tree planting for beautification. IAO STREAM, MAUI, HAWAII (See Section 21 of Text) Channel enlargement, levees, a debris basin and related works. KAHOMA STREAM, MAUI, HAWAII (See Section 22 of Text) A debris basin 100 feet wide and 700 feet long with a capacity of 22,000 cubic yards; a rock sill, a diversion levee which is 80 feet long to direct flows into the concrete channel; a concrete trapezoidal channel about 5,280 feet long; three concrete bridges with clear span of 50 feet; and a revetted outlet extending 70 feet seaward of the stream mouth. KANEOHE-KAILUA AREA, OAHU, HAWAII (See Section 23 of Text) Provide a dam and reservoir about 3.2 miles above the mouth of Kaneohe Stream on the tributary Kamooalii Stream. Project consists of an earthfill dam 80 feet high, with a crest length of about 2,300 feet and about 1,000 feet of channel improvements at the entrance of Kaneohe Stream to Kaneohe Bay; and reservoir with storage of 2,500-acre-feet, of which 500 acre-feet would be for sediment reserve and recreation use and 2,000 acre-feet for flood control. H. Doc. 151, 90th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 94-488, 94th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 92-141, 92nd. Cong., 1st sess. 36-10 H. Doc. 311, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc 75, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 353, 9th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 353, 9th Cong., 2nd sess. Aug. 13, 1968 Oct. 22, 1976 Dec. 31, 1970 PACIFIC OCEAN DIVISION TABLE 36-C RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS (See Section 12 of Text) Date Reconnaissance or condition survey Project conducted Cost Haleiwa Small Boat Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii July 1981 $ 3,077 Honokohau Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii, Hawaii July 1981 9,874 Kaunakakai Harbor, Molokai, Hawaii May 1981 675 Manele Small Boat Harbor, Lanai, Hawaii May 1981 9,924 Nawiliwili Harbor, Kauai, Hawaii August 1981 15,847 Nawiliwili Small Boat Harbor, Kauai, Hawaii August 1981 3,786 Port Allen Harbor, Kauai, Hawaii August 1981 5,674 Waianae Small Boat Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii July 1981 7,739 36-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 36-D OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Section 13 of Text) For Last Cost to September 30, 1981 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report for Construction Maintenance Agana Small Boat Harbor, Territory of Guam 1978 $ 937,798 1 $ 7,942 Ala Wai Small Boat Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii 1976 40,117 Haleiwa Small Boat Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii 1967 & 1978 527,047 2 201,345 Hana Small Boat Harbor, Maui, Hawaii 1967 3 Hanalei Bay Small Boat Harbor, Kauai, Hawaii 1967 -- Heeia-Kea Small Boat Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii 1972 1,481 Honokohau Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii, Hawaii 1971 781,036 4 55,336 Kahului Beach Road, Maui, Hawaii 1976 751,867 5 Kailua Small Boat Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii 1967 - Kalaupapa Harbor, Molokai, Hawaii 1968 157,997 6 3,127 Kaunakakai Harbor, Molokai, Hawaii 1966 138,188 287,452 Keehi Lagoon, Oahu, Hawaii 1956 3,348,000 7 41,857 Kewalo Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii 1976 98,800 - Lahaina Small Boat Harbor, Maui, Hawaii 1977 186,937 - Manele Small Boat Harbor, Lanai, Hawaii 1967 372,000 8 252,222 Maunalua Bay Small Boat Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii 1972 30,378 - Nawiliwili Harbor, Kauai, Hawaii 1962 2,127,724 9 4,226,401 Nawiliwili Small Boat Harbor, Kauai, Hawaii 1976 584,513 10 21,555 Ofu Small Boat Harbor, American Samoa 1976 980,018 11 54,851 Pohoiki Bay, Hawaii, Hawaii 1979 432,523 12 Port Allen Harbor, Kauai, Hawaii 1962 752,645 13 824,552 Reeds Bay Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii, Hawaii 1967 - - Waianae Small Boat Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii 1979 1,940,011 14 11,042 Wake Island Harbor, Wake Island 1950 - 14,493 Wells Harbor, Territory of Guam 1950 2,448,056 15 2,111 1. Authorized by the Chief of Engineers and completed in 9. In addition, Contributed Funds of $233,261 for Construc- October 1977. In addition, Contributed Funds of tion. $282,747 for Construction. 10. Authorized by the Chief of Engineers and completed in 2. Authorized by the Chief of Engineers and completed in November 1974. In addition, Contributed Funds of November 1975. In addition, Contributed Funds of $405,471 for Construction. $410,077 for Construction and $84,388 for Operation and 11. Authorized by the Chief of Engineers and completed in Maintenance. August 1965. In addition, Contributed Funds of $61,953 3. Deauthorized in November 1977 (HD #94-413). for Construction. 4. Completed in March 1970. In addition, Contributed 12. Authorized by the Chief of Engineers and completed in Funds of $630,568 for Construction. April 1979. 5. Authorized by the Chief of Engineers and completed in 13. In addition, Contributed Funds of $200,000 for Construc- April 1976. tion. 6. Authorized by the Chief of Engineers and completed in 14. In addition, Contributed Funds of $1,791,068 for Con- September 1967. struction. 7. Abandonment authorized by R&H Act of 1965 (HD 98, 15. Completed in 1941 and Maintenance transferred to De- 89th Cong., 1st sess.). partment of Navy. 8. Authorized by the Chief of Engineers and completed in December 1965. In addition, Contributed Funds of $370,845 for Construction. 36-12 PACIFIC OCEAN DIVISION OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS TABLE 36-E (See Section 19 of Text) For Last Cost to September 30, 1981 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report for Construction Maintenance Afono Area and Aoa Area, American Samoa 1978 $254,015 1 Haleiwa Beach, Oahu, Hawaii 1967 240,148 2 Hanapepe Bay, Kauai, Hawaii 1965 - Kaaawa Beach, Oahu, Hawaii 1976 176,488 3 Kaimu Black Sand Beach, Hawaii, Hawaii 1975 86,235 4 Kapaa Town, Kauai, Hawaii 1977 158,916 5 Kihei Beach, Maui, Hawaii 1972 154,313 6 Pago Pago to Nuuuli, American Samoa 1978 394,187 7 Poloa Area, American Samoa 1978 136,040 8 Vatia Area, American Samoa 1978 154,309 9 Waikiki Beach, Oahu, Hawaii 1979 729,087 10 85,043 Waimea Beach, Kauai, Hawaii 11 1. Authorized by the Chief of'Engineers and completed in 7. Authorized by the Chief of Engineers and Phase I com- October 1977. In addition $209,549 in Contributed pleted in September 1978. In addition $312,480 in Con- Funds. tributed Funds. 2. Completed in April 1965. In addition $160,098 in Con- 8. Authorized by the Chief of Engineers and completed in tributed Funds. October 1977. In addition $101,547 in Contributed 3. Authorized by the Chief of Engineers and completed in Funds. August 1975. In addition $97,075 in Contributed Funds. 9. Authorized by the Chief of Engineers and completed in 4. Deauthorized in July 1981. October 1977. In addition $132,075 in Contributed 5. Authorized by the Chief of Engineers and completed in Funds. September 1976. In addition $60,000 in Contributed 10. In addition $82,000 in Advanced Funds and $17,640 in Funds. Contributed Funds. 6. Authorized by the Chief of Engineers and completed in 11. No previous full report; project authorized by R&H Act June 1971. In addition $154,313 in Contributed Funds. of 1958. TABLE 36-F OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 26 of Text) For Last Cost to September 30, 1980 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report for Construction Maintenance Hanapepe River, Kauai, Hawaii 1967 $ 784,867 1 Kapaakea Homestead Flood Control, Molokai, Hawaii 1979 221,500 2 Kaunakakai Stream, Molokai, Hawaii 1950 73,748 3 Kawainui Swamp, Oahu, Hawaii 1967 1,265,567 4 Kuliouou Stream, Oahu, Hawaii 1971 1,000,000 5 Wailoa Stream and Tributaries, Hawaii, Hawaii 1966 1,044,888 6 1. Completed in November 1966. In addition $11,953 in Con- 4. Completed in August 1966. tributed Funds. 5. Authorized by the Chief of Engineers and completed in 2. Deauthorized in July 1981. February 1970. In addition $540,335 in Contributed 3. Authorized by the Chief of Engineers and completed in Funds. December 1950. 6. Completed in August 1965. 36-13 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 36-G WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency Bank Protection (Section 28 of Text) Project and Location Fiscal Year Costs Asquiroga Bay Shoreline, Guam $ 15,574 Kalapana Road Protection, Hawaii, Hawaii1 227,897 Matafao Shore Protection, American Samoa -97 Pago Pago International Airport, American Samoa 9,000 1. Authorized by the Chief of Engineers and completed in December 1980. In addition $12,000 in Contributed Funds. 36-14 PORTLAND, OREG., DISTRICT* The territorial limits of the Portland District include the Pacific coastal drainage area of the State of Oregon, the portions of the States of Oregon and Washington which lie within the Columbia River watershed downstream of the Umatilla Bridge below McNary Dam, and south central Oregon west of the Malheur River and the Steens Mountains, but not includingthat part which drains into the Klamath Lake and River. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Channels and Harbors Page 1. Chetco River, Oreg ........................ 37-2 2. Columbia and Lower Willamette Rivers below Vancouver, Wash., and Portland, Oreg. .......................... 37-2 3. Columbia River at Baker Bay, Wash.............37-3 4. Columbia River between Chinook, Wash., and Head of Sand Island ................. 37-4 5. Columbia River at the Mouth, Oreg. and Wash ............................. 37-4 6. Columbia River between Vancouver, Wash., and The Dalles, Oreg. .................... 37-4 7. Coos Bay, Oreg. .............................. 37-5 8. Coos and Millicoma Rivers, Oreg. ................ 37-6 9. Coquille River, Oreg. ........................... 37-6 10. Depoe Bay, Oreg. ............................ 37-6 11. Lake River, Wash ........................... 37-6 12. Lewis River, Wash. ............................. 37-7 13. Multnomah Channel, Oreg. ..................... 37-7 14. Nehalem Bay, Oreg. ............................ 37-7 15. Port Orford, Oreg. .............................. 37-7 16. Rogue River Harbor at Gold Beach, Oreg. ....... 37-8 17. Siuslaw River, Oreg. ......................... 37-8 18. Skamokawa Creek, Wash ................... 37-8 19. Skipanon Channel, Oreg...... ................ 37-9 20. Tillamook Bay and Bar, Oreg. ................... 37-9 21. Umpqua River, Oreg. ........................... 37-9 22. Willamette River above Portland and Yamhill River, Oreg....................... 37-10 23. Yaquina Bay and Harbor, Oreg. .............. 37-11 24. Yaquina River, Oreg. .......................... 37-11 25. Other Authorized Bridge Alterations ......... 37-11 26. Project Condition Surveys .................... 37-11 27. Other Authorized Navigation Projects ........ 37-11 28. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ................................. 37-12 Locks and Dams 29. Willamette River at Willamette Falls, Oreg. ............................... 37-12 *All cost and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. 35. 36. 37. 38. 39. 40. 41. 42. 43. 44. 45. 46. 47. 48. 49. 50. 51. 52. 53. 54. 55. Flood Control Page Local Protection Beaver Drainage District, Oreg ................ 37-12 Johnson Creek, Oreg. ........................ 37-12 Lower Columbia River Basin, Oreg. and Wash. ............................... 37-13 Lower Columbia River Basin Bank Protection, Oreg. and Wash. ............ 37-13 Scappose Drainage District, Oreg. ........... 37-14 Vancouver Lake Area, Wash. ................. 37-14 Wahkiakum County Consolidated Diking District No. 1, Wash. .................... 37-14 Willamette River Basin, Oreg................... 37-14 Willamette River Basin, Oreg. - Bank Protection ...................... 37-15 Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ........................... 37-15 Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ........ 37-15 Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization .......................... 37-15 Reservoirs Applegate Lake, Rogue River Basin, Oreg. ...... 37-16 Blue River Lake, Oreg. ....................... 37-17 Cottage Grove Lake, Oreg. ................... 37-17 Days Creek Lake, Oreg. ...................... 37-17 Dorena Lake, Oreg. ............................ 37-18 Elk Creek Lake, Rogue River Basin, Oreg. ................................. 37-18 Fall Creek Lake, Oreg. ......................... 37-18 Fern Ridge Lake, Oreg. ...................... 37-19 Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations ........................ 37-19 Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power Bonneville Lock and Dam- Lake Bonneville, Oreg. and Wash. .............. Cougar Lake, Oreg. ............................ Detroit Lake, Oreg. ............................ Green Peter-Foster Lakes, Oreg. .............. Hills Creek Lake, Oreg ........................ 37-19 37-20 37-21 37-21 37-21 All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 37-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 Multiple-Purpose Projects Page Multiple-Purpose Projects Page Including Power Including Power 56. John Day Lock and Dam- 60. Other Authorized Multiple-Purpose Lake Umatilla, Oreg. and Wash ................ 37-22 Projects Including Power ................... 37-24 57. Lookout Point Lake, Oreg .................... 37-22 58. Lost Creek Lake, Rogue River Basin, General Investigations Oreg ......................................... 37-23 61. Surveys ...... ....... ................. 37-24 59. The Dalles Lock and Dam- 62. Collection and Study of Basic Data ............ 37-24 Lake Celilo, Wash. and Oreg. ................. 37-23 63. Research and Development ................... 37-25 Navigation Channels and Harbors 1. CHETCO RIVER, OREG. Location. Rises in Siskiyou Mountains of Coast Range at an elevation of 4,000 feet, flows for about 51 miles in a circuitous route, and empties into Pacific Ocean at Brookings, Oreg., 300 miles south of entrance to Columbia River and 345 miles north of San Francisco Bay. (See National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Charts 18600 and 18203.) Existing project. Provides for two jetties at the mouth of the river. Modification in 1965 authorized an entrance channel 120 feet wide by 14 feet deep; a barge turning basin about 250 feet wide, 650 feet long, and 14 feet deep; and a small boat access channel 100 feet wide by 12 feet deep. Also authorized was a 450 foot extension of north jetty with an increase in elevation of existing portion and a protective dike about 1,800 feet long with a top elevation of 18 feet. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between lower low water and mean higher high water is 6.9 feet and extreme is about 12 feet. (See Table 37-B for authorizing legislation.) Recommended modifications. The plan of improvement would deepen the existing navigation channel and turning basin by 2 feet, to a depth of 16 feet mean lower low water, and extend the existing jetty system 750 feet for the north and 1,250 feet for the south jetty. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. The Port Commission of Brookings has developed two large boat basins, one for commercial fishing boats and the other for small private boats, and a public boat launching ramp. There are four fish receiving docks and a sea going barge dock for lumber loading and storage. There is also a privately owned marina and a Coast Guard Station. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: A total of 76,300 cubic yards of material was removed by U.S. hopper dredges Pacific and Yaquina. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of jetties was completed December 1957. Removal of rock pinnacles and an abandoned bridge structure was accomplished in June 1959. Under authorized modification of October 1965, two contracts were completed. Construction of entrance channel and extension of north jetty was initiated in July 1968 and completed in July 1969. Construction of a protective dike, turning basin and small boat access channel was started in September 1969 and completed in March 1970. 2. COLUMBIA AND LOWER WILLAMETTE RIVERS BELOW VANCOUVER, WASH., AND PORTLAND, OREG. Location. The Columbia River rises in British Columbia, through which it flows for 425 miles. It enters the United States in northeastern Washington, and empties into the Pacific Ocean 645 miles north of San Francisco Bay and 160 miles south of Strait of Juan DeFuca. Total length of river is 1,210 miles. (See NOAA Charts 18520, 18521, 18522, 18523, 18524, 18526, & 18531; also Geological Survey Map of Washington). Willamette River rises in Cascade Range in southwestern Oregon, flows northerly, and empties into Columbia River about 100 miles from the sea. Its length from source of Middle Fork is about 294 miles. Project embraces 103.5 miles of Columbia River below Vancouver, Wash., and 14.6 miles of Willamette River below Portland, Oreg. (See NOAA Chart 18526 and Geological Survey Map, State of Oregon.) Previous project. For details see pages 1995 and 1998 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1746 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Provides for a channel 35 feet deep and 500 feet wide from River Mile 106.5 to 105.5, the distance between existing highway and railroad bridges; a channel 40 feet deep and 600 feet wide from Vancouver, Wash., River Mile 105.5 to mouth of Columbia River, River Mile 3; a turning basin at Vancouver, Wash., 40 feet deep, 800 feet wide, and about -5,000 feet long; a turning basin at Longview, Wash., 40 feet deep, average width of 1,200 feet, and about 6,000 feet long; and a channel 40 feet deep in Willamette River with varying widths of 600 to 1,900 feet from mouth (River Mile 0) to Broadway Bridge(River Mile 11.6) which emcompasses Portland Harbor area, subject to provisions that channel from mouth of Willamette River to turning basin at Vancouver, Wash., be limited to 500 feet in width until need for additional width is demonstrated by developed traffic. Existing project also provides for auxiliary channels 10 feet deep and 300 feet wide near Cathlamet, Wash.; 30 feet deep and 300 feet wide in St. Helens (Oreg.) Channel; and 30 feet deep and 500 feet wide connecting upper end of St. Helens Channel with main ship channel of Columbia; 24 feet deep and 200 feet wide along frontage of town of Rainier, Oreg., extended at its upper and lower ends to deep water in Columbia River, 8 feet deep and 150 feet wide from this depth in Columbia River through old mouth of Cowlitz River to a point about 3,000 feet upstream from present terminus of harbor line; a channel from Longview Port dock downstream along pierhead line and past Weyerhaeuser Timber Co. plant at 37-2 PORTLAND, OREG., DISTRICT Longview to a connection with main ship channel below Mount Coffin, the downstream 2,400 feet of this channel to be 30 feet deep and 300 feet wide and remainder to be 28 feet deep and 250 feet wide; construction of a small-boat mooring basin at Astoria, Oreg., to include a sheet-pile, sand-filled breakwater about 2,400 feet long with a 30-foot roadway along its full length, and steel pile shore wings totaling about 1,460 feet long and for stone-and-pile dikes and revetments. Planeof reference in estuary from mouth to Harrington Point is mean lower low water; thence to Portland and Vancouver, low water. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water at mouth of Columbia is about 8 feet, and at Portland and Vancouver about 3 feet at low stages of rivers. Extreme tidal ranges are about 13 and 3 feet, respectively. Annual freshets have little effect on stage of tide at mouth of Columbia; at Portland and Vancouver they average about 12 feet, while highest known reached a stage of 33 feet above low water at Portland. (See Table 37-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. River and Harbor Act of 1962 provides that local interests furnish lands and rights-of-way for construction and future maintenance upon requestof Chiefof Engineers, including suitable disposal areas and necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads, and embankments therefor or costsof such retaining works; hold the United States free from damages; provide and maintain adequate public terminal and transfer facilities open to all on equal terms; make alterations as are required in sewer, water supply, drainage, and other utility facilities for construction and maintenance of the project; assist in work of improving and maintaining main ship channel in Columbia and Willamette Rivers by loaningthe United States a suitable pipeline dredge in good operating condition, with full crew and equipment, without charge other than reimbursement for full operating costs of dredgeon a basis approved by Chief of Engineers, said operating costs to include proportionate maintenance costs based on period of time dredge is in use for the United States; provide and maintain depths in berthing areas and access channels serving terminals, including 50-foot adjacent to pierhead lines, commensurate with depths provided in related project areas; and contribute in cash 1.8 percent of cost of construction of 40-foot channel by the Corps for enhancement of land owned by Port of Portland and contribute in cash 3.5 percentof costof construction of 35-foot channel by the Corps. Contributions in the amount of $233,026 were paid in 1964 prior to commencement of construction. Total cash contribution was $665,954. Terminal facilities. At Portland, Oregon, there are six Port of Portland terminals consisting of 43 berths with total capacity of 8,800,000 tons equipped to handle general cargo, bulk cargo, lumber, automobiles, lifton-liftoff and roll on-roll off containers, and breakbulk vessels. The Portof Portland owns and operates a major ship repair yard, which includes the West Coast's largest, and the world's third largest, floating dry dock. The Port of Portland also has a 450,000 cubic feet cold storage warehouse. Also available in the harbor area are privately operated facilities with total capacity of 16,200,000 tons for receiving, storing and outloading petroleum, wood chips, grain, logs, sand and gravel, cement and steel products. At Astoria, Oreg., there is a terminal with facilities for receiving and handling all types of general cargo. At Vancouver, Wash., there aremunicipalfacilities capableof berthing five ships simultaneously. Each berth is completely outfitted with mechanical and lift facilities for receiving and handling all types of cargo. The port has alow dock to handle roll on-rolloff and side-port dischargingvessels. Thegrain terminal has a storage capacity of 4,500,000 bushels. Portof Longview has a public terminal on Columbia River and a privately owned grain elevator with a capacity of 6,900,000 bushels. This port also has a heavy lift facility, with a capacity of about 600 tons. Port of Kalama has two berthing areas, one port owned and one private, with a capacity of 6,000,000 tons. At other locations on Columbia River between Portland and Columbia River entrance there are sufficient private facilities to accommodate rivervessels and fishingcraft. These facilities, with planned extensions, are considered adequate for existing commerce. (For details see Port Series Nos. 33 and 34, Corps of Engineers, published in 1974 and 1975 respectively.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Regular maintenance continued through the year. A total of 4,611,390 cubic' yards of material was removed by the U.S. hopper dredges, Biddle, Yaquina, and Pacific. The pipeline dredge Oregon removed 2,303,814 cubic yards. Eruption of Mount St. Helens on May 18, 1980 and the ensuing "mud flow" deposited more than 50,000,000 cubic yards of material in the Columbia River near Longview. Immediate start of dredging operations permitted deep draft vessel traffic to resume operations on May 23, 1980, with full draft passage available by July 30,1980. Dredging activities are continuing. Emergency dredging, to September 30,1981, including both pipeline and hopper dredges, equalled 24,502,716 cubic yards of material. Condition at end of fiscal year. Work on the 40-foot channel in Columbia River from Portland, Oregon, and Vancouver, Wash., to the sea was completed in 1976 except for observation of channel to determine if additional control structures or dredging will be required. Auxiliary channel in vicinity of Longview was completed in 1949, and improvement of mouth of Cowlitz River and small boat mooring basin at Astoria were completed in 1950. Project depths are maintained all year except for the period immediately following the annual freshet in May-June when shoaling occurs at several locations. Timing of vessel movement with tidal fluctuations permits maximum draft conditions. In Columbia and Willamette Rivers between mouth and Broadway Bridge at Portland a depth of 40 feet at low tide and 42 feet at high tide is practicable all year. In Columbia River between mouth of Willamette River and Vancouver, Wash., depths of 40 and 42 feet at low and high tide, respectively, are practicable all year. 3. COLUMBIA RIVER AT BAKER BAY, WASH. Location. Baker Bay is a shallow body of water about 15 square miles in extent on the north side of Columbia River near its mouth. Bay is separated from river by Sand Island, a lowlying sand bar only a few feet above high tide level. (See NOAA Chart 18521.) Existing project. A mooringbasin 10 and 12 feetdeep, about 20 acres in extent with protecting breakwaters; and a west channel 10 feet deep connecting basin with deep water in Columbia River, with a width of 150 feet, increased to 200 feet for 2,000 feet at southerly end; achannel east of Sand Island to Port of Ilwaco, a distance of about 5 miles. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is about 8 feet, and extreme about 13 feet. (See Table 37-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Wharves, floats, ramps, and berths, for fishing craft, barges and tow-boats. Small-boat basin and protecting breakwater provides moorings for numerous fishing 37-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 and recreational craft all year. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: The U.S. hopper dredge Yaquina removed 3,570 cubic yards of material from the project. Condition atend of fiscalyear. Channel extending through easterly passage of Sand Island was completed in 1934. This portion of the authorized project is not passable and is not maintained at the present time. Dredging west channel to 8 feet was accomplished September 1948. Deepeningwestchannel to 10 feet, and boat basin and breakwater construction at Ilwaco, Wash., finished December 1957, completed the project. 4. COLUMBIA RIVER BETWEEN CHINOOK, WASH., AND HEAD OF SAND ISLAND Location. At easterly end of Baker Bay, lying on north side of Columbia River near mouth. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Ghart 6151.) Existing project. Channel 10 feet deep and 150 feet wide, extending from head of Sand Island to Chinook: a turning and mooring basin at upper end of channel, 10 feet deep, 660 feet long, and ranging from 275 to 500 feet wide; reconstruction of easterly 393 feet of existing breakwater; and extension of existing breakwater easterly and thence northerly to connect with shore in vicinity of Portland Street, Chinook, Wash. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is about 8 feet and extreme about 13 feet. (See Table 37-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Chinook Packing Company owns a wharf for receiving fresh fish, and one additional fish buying company is located at Chinook. A portion of wharf is also used as a public landing. At upper end of channel there is aturning and mooring basin with facilities for mooring 350 fishing and recreational craft. Adequate terminal and mooring facilities include a public launching ramp, hoist with 10-ton capacity and suitable supply facilities. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: U.S. hopper dredge Pacific removed 66,300 cubic yards of material. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project as originally authorized was completed in 1940. The 10-foot channel depth modification was accomplished September 1958. Rehabilitation of existing breakwater was completed September 1962. 5. COLUMBIA RIVER AT THE MOUTH, OREG., AND WASH. Location. The Columbia River entrance is 645 miles north of San Francisco Bay. Project is about 120 miles downstream of Portland, Oregon, and Vancouver, Washington. For description of Columbia River see Improvement No. 2. Previousproject. Fordetailsseepage 1999, Annual Report for 1915 and page 1740 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Provides for a channel across bar 48 feet deep (mean lower low water), one-half mile wide to be secured by two rubblemound jetties, spur jetty "B" on the north shore and by dredging. The north jetty is about 2.5 miles long and the jetty about 6.6 miles long. The unconstructed spur jetty "B" would be about 1 mile long. Tidal range on bar between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is about 8 feet, and extreme about 13 feet. (See Table 37-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests contributed $500,000 toward construction of the north jetty which was completed in 1917. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Hopper dredges removed 4,651,370 cubic yards of material. Condition at end of fiscal year. The originally authorized project depth of 40 feet was completed in 1918; south jetty completed in 1914 and north jetty in 1917. A spur jetty (jetty "A") was completed in 1939 (repaired in 1961) for the purpose of channel stabilization. Spur jetty "B" currently is classified "inactive." Dredging of the 48-foot bar channel started April 1956, was completed in September 1957. Southjetty rehabilitation started June 1962, was completed September 1964. North jetty rehabilitation started January 1965, was completed April 1965. Project dimensions were available at end of fiscal year. 6. COLUMBIA RIVER BETWEEN VANCOUVER, WASH., AND THE DALLES, OREG. Location. On Columbia River, between Interstate Bridge at Vancouver, Wash., 106.5 miles above mouth and The Dalles, Oreg., mile 191, a distance of 84.5 miles. For description of Columbia River, see Improvement No. 2, "Columbia and Lower Willamette Rivers Below Vancouver, Wash., and Portland, Oreg." Existing project. Channel 27 feet deep at low water and 300 feet wide between Vancouver, Wash., and The Dalles, Oreg., 84.5 miles; a channel 10 feet deep at low water and 300 feet wide at upstream entrance to Oregon Slough, Oreg., a suitable turning basin adjacent to site of port development in vicinity of Camas and Washougal, Wash., a boat basin at Hood River, Oreg., 500 by 1,300 feet and 10 feet deep at normal Bonneville pool level, with a connecting channel of same depth to deepwater, and a protecting breakwater on easterly side; a barge channel to waterfront at Bingen, Wash., 10 feet deep at normal Bonneville pool level, 200 feet wide and about 1 mile long, and an access channel 7 feet deep at normal Bonneville pool level, 100 feet wide and about 1,000 feet long, to a natural mooring basin for small boats near east end of channel; and construction of The Dalles small boat basin, to provide a breakwater and shear boom protected basin about 400 by 800 feet in size with depth of 8 feet below a pool elevation of 72.5 feet at mean sea level. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water at Vancouver is about 3 feet and at Bonneville about 0.2 foot at low stages of the river. Extreme tidal ranges are about 4 feet and 0.4 foot, respectively. (See Table 37-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. At Vancouver, Washington, upstream of Interstate Highway bridge at River Mile 108.1 on site of former shipyard are numerous idle ship-building facilities equipped with railway and river moorage facilities. Also in this area are a paper-storage warehouse with barge slip, two boat building businesses (one temporary), and a storage dock with gantry crane. Sites are available for development to suit lessee. 37-4 PORTLAND, OREG., DISTRICT At Camas, Wash., about 13.5 miles upstream from Vancouver, there is a private wharf used for transfer of papermill supplies and paper to and from barges, and facilities for discharging bulk oils from barges. At Port of The Dalles (mile 44 above Bonneville) there is a municipal wharf 125 by 1,100 feet for use by tugs and barges. There are two 1-story timber and corrugated iron warehouses, each 94 by 461 feet, on this wharf. A private elevator with a capacity of 40,000 bushels and a public elevator of 1,113,800- bushel capacity for handling bulk grain to tugs and barges are also at The Dalles. Public elevator has rail, truck, and water connections. There is a port owned rail connection about threefourths mile below municipal wharf where certain types of cargo may be handled between railroad cars and tugs or barges. At numerous locations over entire waterway are log rollways for transfer of logs to water from trucks and public and private boat basins. Facilities are considered adequate for present commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: The U.S. hopper dredge Pacific removed 513,100 cubic yards of material. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project is complete. Construction of The Dalles small boat basin, was completed in 1949. Channel dredging at upper end of Oregon Slough was accomplished in 1957. Project depth of 27 feet between Bonneville and The Dalles, Oreg., was achieved April 1959. The 27-foot channel depth between Vancouver, Wash., and Bonneville, Oreg., was completed May 1960. Improvement of lower entrance of Bonneville Dam lock was completed in May 1961. At the present time, the channel is maintained to a depth of 16 feet, which is adequate for using traffic. Construction of a boat basin at Hood River, Oreg., and of Camas-Washougal, Wash., turning basin was accomplished February 1962. Construction of a barge channel in Columbia River near Bingen, Wash., was completed September 1963. 7. COOS BAY, OREG. Location. On Oregon coast 200 miles south of mouth of Columbia River and 445miles northof San Francisco Bay. Itis about 13 miles long and 1 mile wide, with an area at high tide of about 15 square miles. (See NOAA Charts 18580 and 18587.) Previous projects. For details see page 1987 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1728 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Two rubblemound, high-tide jetties at entrance; a channel across the outer bar 45 feet deep and 700 feet wide, reducing gradually to 35 feet deep and 300 feet wide near River Mile 1 and continuing to about mile 9; thence a channel 35 feet deep and generally 400 feet wide to mile 15; an anchorage area 35 feet deep, 800 feet wide, and 1,000 feet long at Empire (River Mile 5.5); turning basins at North Bend (River Mile 12.5) and Coalbank (River Mile 14.7) 35 feet deep, 650 feet wide and 1,000 feet long; a channel 22 feet deep and 150 feet wide from Smith's Mill (River Mile 15) to Millington (River Mile 17); a small boat basin, about 500 by900 feet at Charleston, with a connecting channel, 10 feet deep and 150 feet wide, to deep water in Coos Bay, and construction of a protecting breakwater and bulkhead. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Tidal range between lower low water and mean higher high water is 7 feet and extreme is about 11 feet at both the entrance and at Coos Bay. (See Table 37-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. River and Harbor Act of 1970 provides that local interests furnish lands and rights-of-way for construction and subsequent maintenance of the improvement, and for aids to navigation upon request of the Chief of Engineers, including suitable disposal areas and also necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads, and embankments therefor, or the costs of such retaining works; hold the United States free from damages; provide without cost all alterations and relocations of utility facilities; provide and maintain without cost to the United States, depths in berthing and mooring areas and local access channels serving the terminals; adequate public terminal and transfer facilities, open to all on equal terms; and establish regulations prohibiting discharge of pollutants into the waters of the improved channel by users thereof, which regulations shall be in accordance with applicable laws or regulations of Federal, State and local authorities responsible for pollution prevention and control. Terminal facilities. At North Bend there is a municipal dock 649 feet long fronting on channel, about 2,380 feet of privately owned mill docks, and three oil-receiving terminals in vicinity. At Coos Bay there is a privately owned dock with a frontage of 1,345 feet, open to the public on equal terms; several small landings for fishing and harbor craft; and three lumber docks with 1,300-, 576-, and 500-foot frontages, respectively. At Eastside, on Isthmus Slough, there is a 200-foot dock. At Empire there is a privately owned lumber dock with frontage of 510 feet, and an oil terminal, also privately owned, for receipt of petroleum products by barge. At Charleston there are four wharves, one public and three private, with usable areas of 1,200, 750, 7,000, and 12,000 square feet, respectively, for receipt of fresh fish and shellfish and a large seafood receiving and processing plant. There is also a municipally owned small-boat basin, open to all on equal terms, capable of mooring 250 fishing and recreation craft. Servicing facilities for small craft are available at all facilities, and public launching ramps have been constructed in Charleston area by private interests. A privately owned floating moorage on Joe Ney Slough has facilities for mooring about 50 fishing vessels. At Jordan Cove area there is a dock, 248 feet long, for wood chip ships. These facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (For details see Port Series No. 33, Corps of Engineers, published in 1975.) Operations and results durirg fiscal year. Maintenance: U.S. hopper dredge Pacific removed 92,550 cubic yards; U.S. hopper dredge Yaquinaremoved 48,971 cubicyards; U.S. hopper dredge Biddle removed 51,973 cubic yards of material; and the contract hopper dredge Eagle I removed 770,806 cubic yards. Condition at end of fiscal year. South jetty was completed in 1928, north jetty in 1929, and 24-foot channel in 1937. The south jetty was restored in 1941 and 1942 by construction of a concrete cap for full length of the jetty. Excavation of channel to 30 feet deep and generally 300 feet wide from entrance to Isthmus Slough was completed in 1951. Dredging outer bar channelto a depthof40feet, decreasingto30 feet atGuano Rock was completed in 1952. Constructon of the Charleston Channel and small-boat basin was completed in September 1956. Rehabilitation of south jetty was started in June 1962 and completed December 1963. Repair of north jetty was completed in August 1970. Construction of the deeper and wider channel to mile 15 was completed in 1979. 37-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 8. COOS AND MILLICOMA RIVERS, OREG. Location. South Fork and Millicoma Rivers rise in Coast Range in southern Oregon, flow generally westerly and join to make Coos River, 5.3 miles above mouth of Coos River in Coos Bay. (See NOAA Chart 18587, Allegany and Daniels Creek Quadrangle.) Existing project. Originally authorized project: a channel depth of 3 feet, generally, from mouth of Coos River and 1 foot near head of navigation. Project as modified: two channels 5 feet deep and 50 feetwide from mouth of Coos River to Allegany on Millicoma River, mile 13.8 and to Dellwood on South Fork, mile 14, and thence a channel 3 feet deep and 50 feetwide to mile 14.7 on South Fork, including stabilization works on Coos River. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water at the mouth of Coos River is 7 feet and extreme about 11 feet. Tidal range at head of navigation in both forks is about 1 foot. Freshet stages usually reach a height of from 10 to 15 feet at Allegany, head of navigation on Millicoma River. (See Table 37-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Several small privately owned docks and landing places on the river are used by towboats and pleasure craft. There are no publicly owned docks. Present facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contract dredging removed 3,227 cubic yards of material. Condition at end of fiscal year. Originally authorized project providing for a channel from mouth of Coos River to head of navigation in both forks, to provide a depth of 3 feet generally and 1 foot near head of navigation, was completed in 1899. In March 1966 construction of project as modified by 1948 River and Harbor Act was completed. 9. COQUILLE RIVER, OREG. Location. Rises in Coast Range, flows generally westerly for about 100 miles, and empties into Pacific Ocean at Bandon, Oreg., 225 miles south of mouth of Columbia River and 420 miles north of San Francisco Bay. (See NOAA Charts 18580 and 18186.) Previous project. For details see page 1986 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1727 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Two rubblemound high-tide jetties at river mouth, south jetty 2,700 feet long and the north, 3,450 feet long; and a channel 13 feet deep at mean lower low water and of suitable width from the sea to a point 1 mile above old Coquille River Lighthouse, and snagging to State highway bridge at city of Coquille. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water at mouth is 7 feet and extreme about 10 feet. (See Table 37-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. However, restoration of lighthouse using Code 710, Recreation Facilities at Completed Projects, funding required 50 percent cost sharing with non- Federal sponsor (Oregon State Parks). Terminal facilities. At Bandon: A privately owned mill dock used exclusively for shipping lumber on coastwisevessels, a publicly owned wharf, and a small-boat basin open to all on equal terms. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: U.S. hopper dredge Pacific removed 66,000 cubic yards and U.S. hopper dredge Yaquina removed 49,910 cubic yards of material from entrance channel. Condition at end of fiscal year. Jetties were completed in 1908 and entrance channel in 1933. North jetty was reconstructed in 1942 and a 750-foot extension to easterly end was constructed in 1951. South jetty was repaired in 1954 and north jetty in 1956. Coquille Lighthouse rehabilitation was completed June 21, 1976. 10. DEPOE BAY, OREG. Location. Harboron Oregon coast 100miles southof mouth of Columbia River. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 5902.) Existing project. Two breakwaters north of entrance; an entrance channel 8 feet deep and 50 feet wide; and inner basin ; 750 feet long, 390 feet wide and 8 feet deep with retaining wall along easterly side; and a stone spending beach. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between lower low water and higher high water is 8 feet and extreme is about 12 feet. (See Table 37-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Facilities, in inner basin, consist of landings and floats to accommodate operators of excursion and commercial fishing boats. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contract dredging removed 16,000 cubic yards of material. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project as originally authorized was completed in 1939 and project modification, enlarging the basin and deepening to 8 feet, was accomplished in June 1952 and August 1966. Maintenance contract initiated May 1967 was completed July 1967. 11. LAKE RIVER, WASH. Location. IsoutletofVancouver Lake in Washington, flows northerly 11 miles and empties into Columbia River about 88 miles above mouth. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 6154.) Existing project. A channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide to Ridgefield (3 miles). (See Table 37-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. A public marina at Ridgefield 2.5 miles above river mouth with facilities for moorage of 200 fishing and recreation craft. Also plywood plant which has facilities for receipt of logs by water. From Ridgefield to river mouth are several booms for storage of logs. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: The Sand-bypasser Sandwick displaced shoal areas to provide longer periods of channel depths for navigation traffic within the authorized project. Condition at end of fiscalyear. Project completed in 1931. Controlling depth 6 feet, survey of March 1965. 37-6 PORTLAND, OREG., DISTRICT 12. LEWIS RIVER, WASH. Location. Rises in Cascade Range in Washington, flows westerly and southwesterly 110 miles, and empties into Columbia River about 88 miles from its mouth. (See NOAA Chart 18524.) Previous project. For details see page 2001, Annual Report for 1915, and page 1762, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. A low-water channel 6 feet deep and 50 feet wide to mouth of East Fork (3.75 miles); 4 feet deep and 50 feet wide on East Fork from its mouth to La Center (3 miles); 4 feet deep and 50 feet wide on Lewis River from the mouth of East Fork to Woodland (2.5 miles), secured by dredging and construction of regulating works and channel clearing to Merwin Dam(12.5 miles from Woodland). Maximumvariation of water level, due to tide, ranges from about 3 feet at mouth to 1.5 feet at La Center and zero at Woodland. During ordinary freshets a stage of 14 feet and, at extreme floods, a stage of 24 feet is reached in main river at Woodland, Wash. For latest published map see page 3557 of Annual Report for 1904. (See Table 37-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. At Woodland on Lewis River there are several privately owned facilities for mooring, fishing and pleasure craft. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Port of Woodland subleases a commercial log facility at River Mile 1.8, consisting of log rollways and booms for storage. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: The Sand-bypasser Sandwick displaced shoal areas to provide longer periods of channel depths for navigation traffic in the area downstream of River Mile 1.8. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was completed in 1927. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project work was substantially completed by the end of the fiscal year. The estimated contract cost for construction is $266,000. 14. NEHALEM BAY, OREG. Location. On Oregon coast, 40 miles from Columbia River mouth and 10 miles north of the entrance to Tillamook Bay. Existing project. Provides for a jetty about 3,850 feet long on the north side of entrance and a jetty 4,950 feet long on the south side. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 8 feet, extreme is about 15 feet. (See Table 37-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for existing project. Local cooperation has been acquired for the major rehabilitation. Terminalfacilities. Facilities for pleasure craftonly: Dart's Marina, Brighton Moorage, Jetty Fishery, Port of Nehalem and City of Nehalem Dock. All areas have approximately 50-60 slips. However, due to shoaling, all are semi-usable. Operations and results during fiscal year. A contract for rehabilitation was awarded duringthe fiscal year and construction is continuing. Major rehabilitation. Preconstruction planning is complete. Major rehabilitation of both north and south jetties has been initiated. This work will consist of rehabilitating about 3,500 feet of the north jetty and about 4,400 feet of the south jetty. Federal estimated cost (1981) is $12,600,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project as originally authorized was completed in 1918. Rehabilitation work has been initiated and is 20 percent completed. 13. MULTNOMAH CHANNEL, OREG. 1155.. PPOORRTT OORRFFOORRDD, OORREEGG.. Location. Multnomah Channel is a back channel about 22 miles long, connecting the Willamette River at the north boundary of the city of Portland with the Columbia River near the town of St. Helens. Scappoose Bay is a tidal inlet entering Multnomah Channel about one mile upstream of the channel's junction with the Columbia River. Existing project. Provides for an extension of existing Multnomah Channel 10 feet deep, 300 feet wide, and 2,950 feet long. It also provides for a channel in Scappoose Bay 10 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and 7,080 feet long. A gravel source located on the Santosh Slough, about 5 miles upstream of St. Helens, generates a large volume of tug and barge traffic. A rock reef in Multnomah Channel near the entrance to Scappoose Bay restricted available depths to about -8 feet (Columbia River datum). The gravel operators' access channel in Santosh Slough was restricted by terms of their permit to 10 feet due to adjacent flood control levee. (See Table 37-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Port of St. Helens, project sponsor. Operations and results during fiscal year. Contractor dredged 13,790 cubic yards of organic filled silt from the Multnomah Channel, 32,000 cubic yards from Scappoose Bay Channel, and removed a total of 1,425 cubic yards of rock from the Multnomah Channel. Location. On Oregon coast 250 miles south of Columbia River entrance and 390 miles north of San Francisco Bay. (NOAA Chart 18203 and Geological Survey Quadrangle, Port Orford, Oreg.). Existing project. Improvement of harbor by 550-foot extension of existing locally constructed breakwater and dredging of a turning basin, 340 feet long, 100 feet wide and 16 feet deep. (See Table 37-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Complied with. Terminal facilities. A dock which is a timber piling structure about 210 by 70 feet, equipped with hydraulic crane for lifting boats from the water to dock for repairs and/or storage and removing fish catches from boats. About 500 fishing and private boats use this dock each year. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: The Sand-bypasser Sandwick displaced shoal areas to provide longer periods of channel depths for navigation traffic within the authorized project. Condition at end of fiscal year. Extension of existing locally constructed breakwater by 550 feet was completed October 1968. Turning basin was completed September 1971. 37-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 16. ROGUE RIVER, HARBOR AT GOLD BEACH, OREG. Location. Rises in Cascade Range in southwestern Oregon, flows westerly through Coast Range, and empties into Pacific Ocean 264 miles south of mouth of Columbia River and 381 miles north of San Francisco Bay. (See NOAA Chart 18202.) Existing project. Two jetties at entrance, and a channel 13 feet deep and 300 feet wide from ocean to a point immediately below State highway bridge, about 1 mile, including widening channel at a point about 0.25 mile below bridge to form a turning basin 13 feet deep, 500 feet wide, and 650 feet long. At request of local interests, turning basin was located in south portion of estuary downstream from a point 0.25 mile below bridge. This change was effected to permit adequate terminal facilities to be constructed adjacent to turning basin. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Range of tide between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 7 feet, and extreme about 14 feet. (See Table 37-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are various landings for fishing and recreational craft. At Wedderburn, across river from Gold Beach, is a facility to accommodate excursion passengers and small freight items destined for various private landings between Wedderburn and Agness, Oreg. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: The Sand-bypasser Sandwick displaced shoal areas to provide longer periods of channel depths for navigation traffic within the authorized project. Contract dredging was accomplished to clear the boat basin entrance channel. A total of 47,545 cubic yards of material was removed by contract pipeline dredge. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project as authorized has been completed. Construction of two jetties at entrance was completed September 1960. Dredging river channel by contract and entrance bar by government plant was completed October 1961. North jetty rehabilitation along channel side was completed October 1966. Breakwater construction and dredging, under contract awarded in September 1964, was 17 percent accomplished when flood of December 1964 destroyed all completed works. Contract was terminated as further construction at that location was considered unfeasible. Bank protection work at Wedderburn location was completed in October 1972. A breakwater, constructed by Port of Gold Beach, was completed during 1973. 17. SIUSLAW RIVER, OREG. Location. Rises in coast range, flows about 110 miles westerly and empties into Pacific Ocean about 160 miles south of entrance of Columbia River and 485 miles north of San Francisco Bay, Calif. (See NOAA Charts 18583 and 18580.) Previous project. For detailssee page 1988, Annual Report for 1915. Existing project. Provides for 2 high-tide, rubblemound jetties 750 feet apart at the outer end, the north jetty 8,390 feet long(600feetunconstructed)andthesouthjetty4,200feetlong; an entrance channel 18 feet deep and 300 feet wide from deep water in ocean to a point 1,500 feet inside the outer end of existingnorthjetty; thenceachannel 16 feetdeep, 200feetwide with additional widening at bends, and about 5 miles long, to a turning basin, 16 feet deep, 400 feet wide, and 600 feet long, opposite Siuslaw dock at Florence; a channel 12 feet deep, 150 feet wide from Florence to mile 16.5; and at River Mile 15.5 a turning basin 12 feet deep, 300 feet wide and 500 feet long. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water at mouth of river is 7 feet and extreme about 11 feet. During low stages of river, tidal effect extends to Mapleton, 20.5 miles above mouth. The FY 81 Energy and Water Development Act authorized the extending of the north and south jetties and Advance Engineering and Design was initiated during the fiscal year. Estimated cost is $33,500,000 (full funding) Corps of Engineers funds and $2,000 U.S. Coast Guard. (See Table 37-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for all completed work. Estimated costs for all requirements under terms of project authorization were $156,000 (1971). Terminal facilities. The principal terminal facility on the river is at Davidson Lumber Dock at Mapleton which accommodates ocean-going barges with packaged lumber. Port dock at Florence, 150 feet wide and 350 feet long, is about 5.3 miles above river entrance and accommodates a fishreceiving station at east end of wharf which maintains a 2-ton capacity winch and supplies gasoline, oil, and ice to fishermen. Other facilities at Florence consist of various floatways which provide docking facilities for fishing vessels and other small craft and a floating dock with accommodations for 75 commercial fishing vessels. Adjacent to commercial basin is mooring basin with accommodations for 200 sport boats of all sizes. Across the river and below highway bridge at Glaneda are floatways used by small craft. A modern dock for loading ocean-going barges with packaged lumber is maintained at Mapleton by U.S. Plywood Champion Lumber Company and a new 330-foot port dock was constructed last year in Florence. The Port has recently acquired a marine travel lift to accommodate vessels 70 feet in length or 60 tons in weight. There are also a number of private landings and log booms between Cushman and Mapleton to accommodate river traffic. These facilities are considered adequate for existing traffic. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: U.S. hopper dredge Pacific removed 124,000 cubic yards, U.S. hopper dredge Yaquina removed 264,360 cubic yards, and contract pipeline dredge Nehalem removed 79,513 cubic yards of material from entrance channel. Condition at end of fiscal year. Advance Engineering and Design was initiated on extending north and south jetties authorized by FY 81 Energy & Water Development Act. 18. SKAMOKAWA CREEK, WASH. Location. Rises in Wahkiakum County, in southwestern part of the State of Washington, flows southwesterly and southerly about 10 miles, and empties into Columbia River about 34 miles above mouth. (See NOAA Chart 18523.) Existingproject. Providesforachannel 6.5feetdeepatlow water and 75 feet wide, between Steamboat and Brooks Sloughs, about 1,600 feet long. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is about 7 feet and maximum variation of water level due to tides or freshets is about 12 feet. During ordinary freshets a stage of 12 feet is 37-8 PORTLAND, OREG., DISTRICT reached in creek at Skamokawa, Wash. (See Table 37-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. There are several privately owned docks on Skamokawa Creek, Steamboat Slough, and Brooks Slough for use of towboats and pleasure craft. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: The Sand-bypasser Sandwick displaced shoal areas to provide longer periods of channel depths for navigation traffic within the authorized project. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project as authorized was completed in 1920. 19. SKIPANON CHANNEL, OREG. Location. In tidal waterway extending south 2.7 miles from deep water in Columbia River. Channel enters Columbia about 10 miles above mouth and 4 miles below Astoria, Oreg. (See NOAA Chart 18523.) Existing project. Channel 30 feet deep and generally 200 feet wide extending from deep water in Columbia River to railroad bridge at Warrenton, Oreg., distance of 1.8 miles, turning basin of same depth, mooring basin 12 feet deep at mean lower low water at Warrenton, Oreg., and channel 6 feet deep, generally 40 feet wide, with increased widths at log dumps and terminals, for 4,500 feet via cutoff channel above railroad bridge. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is about 8 feet, extreme is about 13 feet. (See Table 37-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. City of Warrenton owns wharf with a 300-foot frontage open to public on equal terms. One privately owned cannery wharf with a 300-foot frontage is used for unloading fish and handling fish nets. One privately owned boatyard has floats and moorage facilities for use of a maximum of 80 small boats. In channel above railroad bridge, facilities consist of log rollways used for sorting logs which are no longer operated. Small-boat basin has facilities for numerous fishing and recreation craft. These facilities, except duringthe fishing season, are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: U.S. hopper dredge Pacific removed 51,500 cubic yards of material from the channel. Contract dredging removed 16,200 cubic yards of material. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project as authorized is complete. Dredging river channel and turning basin was completed in 1939. Construction of small-boat mooring basin at Warrenton, Oreg., was completed October 1957, and fill stabilization work was accomplished in August 1958. 20. TILLAMOOK BAY AND BAR, OREG. Location. Bay is on Oregon coast about 50 miles south of mouthof Columbia River. (See NOAA Charts 18520 and 18558.) Previous project. For details see page 1989 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1474 of Annual Report for 1936. Existing project. Provides for a jetty about 5,700 feet long on north side of entrance and ajetty 8,000 feet longon south side; a channel through bar 18 feet deep and of such width as can be practically and economically obtained; for a channel 200 feet wide and 18 feet deep from deep water in bay to Miami Cove; and for initial dredgingto 12feetdeepof asmall-boatbasin and approach thereto at Garibaldi, Oreg. Project also provides for improvement of Bayocean Peninsula, Oreg., by construction of sand and rockfill dike 1.4 miles long, on alinement extending between Pitcher Point and town of Bayocean. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 8 feet, extreme is about 14 feet. Hobsonville Channel portion of project is inactive. Federal cost of new work was $22,434,827 including $77,209 for previous project.(See Table 37-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Complied with for all work. River and Harbor Act of 1965 required local interests provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way for construction and future maintenance and aids to navigation upon requestof the Chief of Engineers, including suitable disposal areas, and necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads, and embankments therefor or the costs of such retaining works; hold United States free from damage; provide and maintain adequate public terminal and transfer facilities open to all on equal terms; and provide and maintain depths in berthing areas and local access channels serving the terminals, including the 50-foot strip adjacent to pierhead lines, commensurate with depths provided in related project areas. All necessary rights-of-way were furnished as of April 17, 1968. Terminal facilities. At Garibaldi: A facility owned by the Port of Bay City, for shipping lumber and receiving logs, a public landing suitable for mooring fishing vessels, towboats, and other craft. Small-boat basin has adequate facilities for mooring fishing and recreational craft. A privately owned boat ramp and moorage is available for recreational craft. At Bay City: A privately owned wharf used exclusively for receipt of fresh fish and shellfish. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: contract pipeline dredge removed 25,000 cubic yards of material. Condition at end of fiscal year. Except for construction of Hobsonville Channel portion, classified inactive, channels were completed in 1927, north jetty in 1933, improvement of Bayocean Peninsula in 1956, and small-boat basin in 1958. Rehabilitation of north jetty was accomplished September 1965. Construction of south jetty was initiated April 1969 and was completed in September 1979. 21. UMPQUA RIVER, OREG. Location. Rises in Cascade Range, flows westerly about 120 miles, and empties into Pacific Ocean 180 miles south of Columbia River and 465 miles north of San Francisco Bay. (See NOAA Charts 18580 and 18584.) Previous projects. For details see page 2967 of Annual Report for 1898, and page 1732 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. A jetty on north side of entrance about 8,000feet long, asouth jetty 4,200feetlongextendingtoapoint 1,800 feet south of outer end of north jetty; dredging to provide a usable entrance channel 26 feet deep, and a river channel 22 37-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 feet deep and 200 feet wide, from mouth to Reedsport, a distance of about 12 miles with a turning basin at Reedsport 1,000 feet long, 600 feetwide, and 22 feet deep; a channel 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide from deep water in the river to vicinity of docks in Winchester Bay with a mooring and turning basin 12 feet deep, 175 feet wide, and 300 feet long at inner end; and a channel 22 feet deep and 200 feet wide from main river channel near mile 8 to Gardiner, Oreg., and a turning basin of same depth, 500 feet wide, and 800 feet long, opposite Gardiner. Project was modified in 1954 to provide a channel in Scholfield River, but this portion of the project is currently inactive. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water at river mouth is 7 feet, and extreme range is about 11 feet. FY 1979 Appropriation Act included authorization to extend the trainingjetty to the tip of the south jetty. Federal cost for new work is $17,868,877 including $39,244 for previous project. (See Table 37-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Complied with for all work except Scholfield River channel modification. Terminal facilities. At Gardiner there is about 650 feet of wharf frontage. Also, there is an oil unloading facility owned by International Paper Co. for exclusive use of tanker barges. Port of Umpqua owns one wharf with 456 feet of water frontage, of which 228 feet is usable for vessels and another with about 75 feet of water frontage which has not been used generally for commercial shipping. On Bolon Island across the river from Reedsport a wharf was constructed which has about 5 acres of open storage for lumber and available to all on equal terms. At Winchester Bay, 2 miles from river entrance there is a major sports and commercial fishing harbor. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Completed construction of extension of training jetty. Maintenance: U.S. hopper dredge Pacific removed 136,381 cubic yards and the U.S. hopper dredge Yaquina removed 125,942 cubic yards of material. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project is complete. North jetty was completed in 1940. Extension to original south jetty was completed in 1938. Dredging a 22-foot channel from mouth of river to Reedsport was completed in 1941. Gardiner Channel and turning basin was completed in 1949 and Winchester Bay Channel and mooring basin in 1956. The 12-foot channel in Scholfield River is currently classified inactive. Rehabilitation of south jetty was completed August 1963. Extension of training jetty was completed October 9, 1980. 22. WILLAMETTE RIVER ABOVE PORTLAND AND YAMHILL RIVER, OREG. Location. Yamhill River rises in Coast Range, flows easterly, and empties into Willamette River about 42 miles above Portland. Its length from source of South Fork is about 52 miles. (See NOAA Chart 18526 and Geological Survey map, State of Oregon.) For description of Willamette River see Improvement No. 2. Previous projects. For details see page 1997 of Anqual Report for 1915, and page 1754 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Provides for improvement of Willamette River between Portland (mile 14) and Oregon City (mile 26) by a channel 8 feet deep at low water, 200 feet wide below Cedar Island and 150 feet wide thence to Oregon City; such channel improvement and contraction works as may be necessary to secure with streamflow regulation, controlling depths of 6 feet at low water and of no prescribed width, from Oregon City to mouth of Santiam River (mile 108.5), 5 feet from that point to Albany (mile 120), 2.5 to 3.5 feet deep from Albany to Corvallis (mile 132), and for necessary snagging between Corvallis and Eugene (mile 185). Local interests dredge and maintain a 20-foot channel to the dock at Lake Oswego for receipt of limerock. Project also provides for a channel in Yamhill River 4 feet deep at low water and 60 feet wide from its mouth to McMinnville (18 miles) secured by means of a lock and dam near Lafayette and by removal of obstructions. Section of Willamette River in vicinity of Willamette Falls at Oregon City is covered by Improvement No. 29. For Willamette River below falls at Oregon City ordinary fluctuation of stage of water is 15 feet and extreme fluctuation due to flood conditions 35 to 50 feet. Above Oregon City ordinary fluctuation is 12 to 20 feet and extreme is 20 to 27 feet. For Yamhill River ordinary fluctuation is 35 feet and extreme 48 feet. Tidal changes vary from about2.5 feet at mouth of Willamette to zero, 26 miles above mouth. (See Table 37-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Between Ross Island Bridge at Portland and Willamette Falls at Oregon City: Privately owned mill docks, sand and gravel wharves, a cement loading facility, a small shipyard, and oil-receiving stations. Above the falls there are privately owned landings including a facility at Pulp Siding (3 miles above the falls) with rail and water connections for shipment of clay and receipt of papermill products by barge. At Wilsonville and Newberg there are sand and gravel facilities. At numerous locations as far as Corvallis (River Mile 132) there are log rollways which are currently inactive. At Lake Oswego there is a dock for the receipt of limerock used in the manufacture of cement. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, coordination with Port authorities and resource monitoring continued. Condition atendoffiscalyear. Existingprojectis about 18 percent complete. The 8-foot channel between Portland and Oregon City and 2.5- to 3.5-foot channel between Oregon City and Albany were completed in 1939. The 2.5- to 3.5-foot channel between Albany and Corvallis was completed in 1945. Remaining work required to complete project consists of construction of such contraction works and channel improvements as may be necessary, with streamflow regulation, to secure controlling depths of 6 feet at low water from Oregon City to mouth of Santiam River, and 5 feet from that point to Albany. This remaining portion has been placed in thedeferred category. Due to lack of use by commercial traffic for which facilities were provided, operation of Yamhill lock was discontinued February 7, 1954, and the lock and adjacent property reported surplus and turned over to Yamhill County January 16, 1959. There is no maintenance of the channel above Newberg, so it is only usable during higher river stages. 37-10 PORTLAND, OREG., DISTRICT 23. YAQUINA BAY AND HARBOR, OR G. Location. Bay is on Oregon coast, 113 miles south of mouth of Columbia River. (See NOAA Charts 18580 and 18581.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Report for 1893, part 4, page 3314, and Annual Report for 1938, page 1736. Existing project. Two high tide rubblemound jetties at entrance, north jetty 7,000 feet, and south jetty 8,600 feet long; a spur jetty on channel side of south jetty 4,700 feet from its sea end, 800 feet long; five groins channelward from south jetty; channel 40 feet deep for a general width of 400 feet across bar and at outer end of entrance channel; a channel 30 feet deep and 300 feet wide to a turning basin of same depth, 900 to 1,200 feet wide and 1,400 feet long, and a channel 18 feet deep and 200 feet wide from 30-foot channel at about mile 2.4, thence upstream to abandoned railroad terminus at Yaquina, a distance of about 4.5 miles. Project also provides for two small boat mooring basins at Newport, Oreg. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 8 feet and extreme is about 12 feet. (See Table 37-B for authorizing legislation.) Terminal facilities. At McLean Point, on north side of bay, about 2 miles from entrance, Yaquina Terminals has two berths capable of serving ocean-going vessels, one 435 feet long, the second 520 feet long. At the time the second berth was dredged, a retaining wall and fill of 6 acres were constructed adjacent to deep water. The company now has 40 acres of filled land adjacent to deep water, and of this total, 7 acres were constructed in 1956-57. This facility has necessary carriers and lift trucks for handling lumber cargoes, warehouse for covered cargo storage, and is open to all on equal terms. No deep draft commerce presently use these facilities. Port of Newport has a public wharf with 300 feet of frontage for servicing fishing boats. In addition, Port of Newport maintains 510 berths for mooring commercial and sport fishing vessels. There are several seafood companies on the bay which have their own facilities for handling fresh fish and crab. Supplies and petroleum products are readily available for small vessels. On south side of bay about 1.2 miles above entrance, Port of Newport has constructed South Beach Marina which can handle approximately 600 small pleasure craft and shallow draft fishing boats. Public facilities include public automobile and boat trailer parking, boat launching ramp, fuel dock, fishing pier, and picnic area. A dry boat moorage for 120 boats, is nearing completion. A swing hoist with 3-ton capacity is currently available and one with 60-ton capacity is planned. About 1.5 miles above entrance, Oregon Aqua Foods, subsidiary of Weyerhaeuser Company, maintains a commercial fish farm facility. About 2.0 miles above entrance, Oregon State University, in conjunction with the Marine Science Center on 52 acres, maintains a 220-foot pier for docking large and small research vessels and a 100-foot float for docking small boats. Docking facilities are restricted to research vessels and State of Oregon small boats. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: U.S. hopper dredge Yaquina removed 141,460 cubic yards of material. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project as originally authorized was completed in May 1952. Restoration of jetties was completed in 1934 and extension of north jetty 1,000 feet seaward was completed in 1940. Construction of mooring basin at Newport and dredging of channel and turning basin to project dimensions were completed during fiscal year 1949. Restoration of north jetty was again accomplished in 1956. Under modification of July 3, 1958, extension of north jetty was completed in September 1966, dredging of 40-foot bar channel and 30-foot river channel was completed in October 1968, and extension of south jetty was completed in June 1972. 24. YAQUINA RIVER, OREG. Location. Rises in Coast Range, flows about 50 miles in a westerly direction, and empties into Yaquina Bay, on Oregon Coast. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 5802 and 6058.) Existing project. Provides for two controlling half-tide dikes of piling, brush, and stone, each about 1100 feet long (constructed by local interests), and for a channel 10 feet deep and generally 150 feet wide on Yaquina River and 200 feet wide in Depoe Creek, extending from town of Yaquina to Toledo, about 9 miles. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between lower low water and mean higher high water is 8 feet and extreme about 12 feet. Freshet heights are about 12 feet at mouth of Depoe Creek. (See Table 37-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Near town of Yaquina at river mouth, which is also head of Yaquina Bay, there is a moorage for small vessels and a small-craft shipyard. Both port and city of Toledo have public-terminal facilities for accommodation of local craft. There are also privately owned facilities for loading lumber barges, receipt of bunker fuel oil, and log rollways for receipt of logs. These facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: No maintenance required during the current year. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of channel work authorized March 1913 was completed 1914. 25. ALTERATION OF BRIDGES See Table 37-H. 26. PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS See Table 37-E 27. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS See Table 37-F. 37-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 28. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (preauthorization). See Table 37-G. Aquatic plant control (Section 302, Public Law 89-298): Total costs for fiscal year were $5,931. Streambank erosion control evaluation and demonstration (Section 32, Public Law 93-251): Total costs for fiscal year were $559. Shoreline erosion control demonstration (Section 54, Public Law 93-521): Total costs for fiscal year were $6,404. Locks and Dams 29. WILLAMETTE RIVER AT WILLAMETTE FALLS, OREG. Location. Locks and dam covered by this project are at Willamette Falls, a rocky reef in Willamette River at Oregon City, Oreg., about 26 miles above mouth of river. Existing project. Provides for construction of a new singlelift main lock and a guard lock each with clear dimensions of 56 by 400 feet and a minimum depth over sills of 9.5 feet, to replace existing facilities which were provided for by purchase, rehabilitation, and deepening to 6 feet at low water of existing canal and locks and separation of canal from waterpower intake by construction of a concrete division wall. Construction of a new lock is currently an inactive project. The existing locks are on the National Register for historic sites, making their replacement unlikely. Total length of existing canals and locks is about 3,500 feet. Principal features of existing canal and locks at Willamette Falls are set forth in Table 37-D. Ordinary fluctuation of stage of water above locks is 12 feet and extreme, due to flood conditions, 20 feet. Below locks, ordinary fluctuation is 15 feet and extreme 50 feet. (See Table 37-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Crown Zellerbach Corp. has a timber wharf about 850 feet long, extending to and supported by concrete division wall built in lock canal by United States. This wharf is used for receiving mill supplies and shipping paper and paper products. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Rehabilitation of Lock Chamber No.1 and remove and replace miter seals. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing canal and locks originally constructed by private interests in 1873 were purchased by the United States in April 1915 for $375,000. Final report on purchase and rehabilitation of canal and locks is in Annual Report for 1923, when project was reported 98 percent complete. Replacement of gates Nos. 6 and 7 was completed August 1967 under minor rehabilitation funds. Existing locks and grounds are in fair condition and in continuous operation except when flooded out by high water or undergoing repair. Facilities are obsolete and inadequate for existing traffic. No construction work has been done on lock and guard lock, which was authorized to replace existing facilities by Flood Control Act of 1939, and River and Harbor Act of 1945. This portion of the project has been reclassified "deferred". Flood Control Local Protection 30. BEAVER DRAINAGE DISTRICT, COLUMBIA COUNTY, OREG. Location. In Columbia County, Oreg., north of town of Clatskanie and extends along Columbia River and Bradbury Slough between River Miles 49.7 and 55.4. Existing project. The project originally provided for reconstruction of 10.4 miles of existing levee; construction of 0.9 mile of new levee; construction of 2.5 miles stone revetment, one pumping plant and 1.1 miles of diversion canal. The Flood Control Act of May 17, 1950 authorized additional improvements which included raising and strengthening the existing levee and installing toe drains where required; removing two antiquated pumping stations from the levee section; constructing a new pumping station with increased capacity; removing the existing Tank Creek tide box structure; and replacing the Tank Creek tide box with a fresh water intake. Estimated Federal cost is $2,865,000 (1981). (See Table 37-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Flood Control Act of 1950, provides local interests furnish lands and rights-of-way; make necessary highway, highway bridge, and utility alterations; hold the United States free from damages; and maintain and operate works after completion. In addition, local interests must agree to comply with the requirements of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Land Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, Title VI, of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and Section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970, Public Law 91-611. A resolution of formal assurances for local cooperation was signed by the Board of Supervisors for Beaver Drainage District on June 30, 1966 and accepted by the Portland District Engineer on November 18, 1966. Drainage District officials by letter dated March 4, 1970, affirmed that their district could meet all requirements of local cooperation not later than two years from the date of that letter. Formal assurances of local cooperation have been furnished and accepted by the Portland District Engineer. In addition, a reaffirmation was made in October 30, 1973 letter to fulfill required assurances. A written agreement was furnished from local interests and signed by the Secretary of the Army May 8, 1975. Operations and results during fiscal year. Contractual work completed. Condition at end of fiscal year. The work originally authorized was completed in 1939. Design memorandum for the improvements authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1950 was completed in 1962 and updated in 1974. Construction of improvement was basically completed in June 1978. 31. JOHNSON CREEK, PORTLAND AND VICINITY, OREG. Location. Johnson Creek, a minor tributary of Willamette River, rises in low foothills of Cascade Range and flows westerly through towns of Gresham and Lents, along southeast boundary of city of Portland to its confluence with Willamette River at town of Milwaukie. Existing project. Provides for channel improvements and bank protection at various locations between mile 15.26 and 37-12 PORTLAND, OREG., DISTRICT mouth. Through town of Gresham, project provides for about 1 mile of channel clearing and improvment; between mile 10.3 and 9.27 for channel clearing; and between mile 7.79 and mouth, for channel improvement, clearing, and revetment work including excavation of a bypass channel to pass floodwaters through constricted industrial and residential reach between mile 7.0 and 5.19. This will provide protection through town of Gresham against floods of a frequency of once in 7 years, and between mile 10.3 and mouth against floods of a frequency of once in 25years. Estimated Federal cost(1981) is $5,020,000. (See Table 37-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must provide lands and rights-of-way; make necessary highway, highway bridge, and utility alterations; hold the United States free from damages; and maintain and operate completed works. Estimated costs for all requirements of local cooperation under terms of project authorization were $2,540,000 (1981). The potential project sponsor, Metropolitan Service District (METRO), initiated the formation of Local Improvement District to provide funds for non-Federal costs. In November 1979, METRO advised the Corps of Engineers of its intention to sponsor the project. Operations and results during fiscal year. In July 1980 the METRO tabled action on the Assessment Ordinance for the project pending the results of a referendum vote on the Local Improvement District in February 1981. The METRO suggested to postpone the negotiation of any agreement between the METRO and the Corps concerning sponsorship until that time. Condition at end of fiscal year. The Local Improvement District, (LID) as originally proposed by METRO has been dissolved due to an overwhelming defeat of the proposal in the February 1981 election. Only limited Advance Engineering and Design is being accomplished which would be of general use if sponsorship is not forthcoming. METRO is pursuing reformation of a Local Improvement District and should be in a position to indicate sponsorship during FY 1982. 32. LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN, OREG. AND WASH. Location. On Columbia River and minor tributaries, channels, and sloughs, between Sandy River, Oreg., about 15 miles east of Vancouver, Wash., and mouth of Columbia River. Existing project. Plan for bank protection work, improvements to existing projects, and construction of flood control works in Lower Columbia River Basin provides for new construction and supplementing and extending projects constructed in Lower Columbia River Basin under authority of 1936 Flood Control Act: (a) Lower Columbia River Bank Protection, Oreg. and Wash. provides for bank protection works at 96 locations on Columbia River and tributaries between Sandy River and mouth of Columbia River, totaling about 224,145 linear feet. Estimated total Federal cost is $29,100,000 (full funding) and non-Federal cost is $306,000; (b) See Table 37-J on Levees and Improvements to Existing Works; (c) Lower Columbia River Basin levees at new locations, Oreg. and Wash., provides for construction of flood control works at: Washougal area, Clark County, Wash., about 5.5 miles of levee and appurtenant works at a Federal cost of $1,803,488, and non- Federal cost at $98,000; and Vancouver Lake area in vicinity of Vancouver, Wash., about 18 miles of levee and appurtenant works at an estimated Federal cost (1980) of $19,500,000 and non-Federal cost at $900,000. This portion, Vancouver Lake, Wash., has been reclassified "deferred". Total estimated Federal costs (1980) for both areas of work are $21,303,488 and non-Federal costs $998,000. Approved (1981) Federal cost for all active work under project, Lower Columbia River Basin, Oreg., and Wash., is $51,195,517. (See Table 37-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Flood Control Act of 1950 provides local interests furnish lands and rights-of-way; make necessary highway, highway bridge, and utility alterations; hold the United States free from damages; and maintain and operate completed works. Total non-Federal costs for all active work are $4,530,290. For details of status or requirements of local cooperation see individual project reports. Operations and results during fiscal year. See individual projects. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of improvement to existing project in Sandy Drainage District, Oreg., was completed by local interests at no construction cost to the Government. Improvements of levees have been accomplished by contract at the following locations: Multnomah County Drainage District, No. 1, Oreg., June 1962; Sauvie Island Drainage District, Oreg., October 1962; Woodson Drainage District, Oreg., December 1963; Rainier Drainage District, Oreg., June 1964; Cowlitz County Diking Improvement District, No. 15, Wash., December 1965; Cowlitz County Diking Improvement Districts, Nos. 2 and 13, Wash., June 1965; Midland Drainage District, Oreg., April 1967; Cowlitz County Consolidated Diking Improvement District, No. 2, Wash., June 1974; Beaver Drainage District, Oreg., June 1978; Wahkiakum County Consolidated Diking District #1, Wash., October 1979; and Scappoose Drainage District, Oreg., September 1980. Washougal Area, Wash., (new location) levee construction has been completed. Under authorization for Lower Columbia River Basin bank protection works, construction is complete at 68 locations. 33. LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN BANK PROTECTION, OREG. WASH. Location. On Columbia River and tributaries between Sandy River, Oreg., and mouth of Columbia River. Existing project. Provides for construction of 224,145 linear feet of bank protection works at 96 locations along Lower Columbia River below River Mile 125 and along principal tributaries in this reach, to protect existing improvements such as levees and developed industrial lands from further erosion. Existing project is a unit of general comprehensive plan for flood control, navigation, and other purposes in Columbia River Basin. Estimated Federal cost is $29,100,000 (full funding). (See Table 37-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Flood Control Act of 1950 provides local interests furnish lands and rights-of-way; make necessary highway, highway bridge, and utility alterations; hold the United States free from damages; and maintain and operate works after completion. Estimated costs for all requirements of local cooperation are $306,000. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Completed 441 linear feet of bank protection at Wadesky location, 2,975 linear feet at Mink location, 2,350 linear feet at Tucker location. Old mill rehabilitation work has been started and is scheduled for completion by November 1981. 37-13 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of project began in July 1961 and is 84 percent complete. A total of 153,804 linear feet of bank protection work at 68 locations has been completed. 34. SCAPPOOSE DRAINAGE DISTRICT, OREGON Location. In Columbia County, Oreg., along left bank of Multnomah Channel opposite Columbia River Miles 90.3 to 97.0. Existing project. The project as originally authorized by the Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, provided for reconstruction of the existing levee system. Additional improvements provide for raising and strengthening 52,000 feet of levee, construction of toe drains, and additional pumping capacity. Estimated Federal cost is $3,570,000 (1981). (See Table 37-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Flood Control Act of 1950, provides local interests furnish lands, easements, and rights-of-way; make necessary highway, highway bridge, and utility alterations; hold the United States free from damages; and maintain and operate completed works. Estimated costs of all requirements of local cooperation under terms of project authorization were $114,000 (1978). The Board of Supervisors adopted a resolution dated February 12, 1968, indicating approval of the proposed work and expressing their ability and willingness to provide the necessary local cooperation. Local interests have worked closely with the Corps in developing the revised plan of improvement. Rights-of-way were furnished by diking district officials April 26, 1976. Operations and results during fiscal year. Completed contract was finalized. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project as originally authorized was completed in 1941. Design memorandum approved by higher authority in September 1971. Final environmental impact statement filed with CEQ April 24, 1972. Supplement to EIS was filed with CEQ July 29, 1974. Additional improvements were completed in September 1980. 35. VANCOUVER LAKE AREA, WASH. Location. In the southwestern part of Clark County, Wash., along the Columbia River between River Miles 96 and 103. Existing project. Provides for raising and strengthening an existing levee and construction of new levee with a cross levee to proposed State Route No. 501 along Lake River. State Route No. 501 would serve as a levee upstream and along the west shore of Vancouver Lake. Pumping plants and drainage structures would be provided for evacuation of surface drainage and seepage. Estimated Federal cost $19,500,000 (1980). (See Table 37-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Flood Control Act of 1950, provides local interests furnish lands, easements, and rights-of-way; make necessary highway, highway bridge, and utility alterations; hold the United States free from damages; and maintain and operate completed works. Estimated costs of all requirements of local cooperation under terms of project authorization were $900,000 (1980). Operations and results during fiscal year. None. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was reclassified from the "active" to "deferred" category on July 16, 1981 as Diking District #14 (local sponsor) could not furnish required local cooperation at the present time. 36. WAHKIAKUM COUNTY CONSOLIDATED DIKING DISTRICT NO. 1, WASH. Location. District occupies both Puget and Little Islands in Columbia River between River Miles 38.4 and 45.0 These islands are in Wahkiakum County, Wash., near town of Cathlamet. Existing project. Provides for raising and strengthening existing levees, removing several abandoned tide boxes, constructing a new tide box, extending an existing tide box and adding a gate well structure, constructing a new pumping station and relocating three existing pumping stations; raising the discharge lines of all pumping stations; and filling borrow ditches along the landward levee toe. Estimated Federal cost is $5,341,000 (1981). (See Table 37-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Flood Control Act of 1950 provides local interests furnish lands and rights-of-way; make necessary highway, highway bridge, and utility alterations; hold the United States free from damages; and maintain and operate completed works. Operations and results during fiscal year. Construction was completed in October 1979. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of new tide box was completed January 1976. Replacement of three pump stations and one tide box and addition of one pumphouse is complete. Final EIS filed September 18, 1972. 37. WILLAMETTE RIVER BASIN, OREG. Location. Willamette River, formed by Coast and Middle Forks which join a few miles above Eugene, Oreg., flows north 189 miles, and enters Columbia River 101.5 miles above its mouth. Basin has an area of 11,200 square miles and lies between Cascade Range on the east and Coast Range on the west. Major tributaries of Willamette River rise in Cascade Mountains and consist of Coast and Middle Forks and McKenzie, Calapooia, Santiam, Molalla, and Clackamas Rivers. Important tributaries that head in the Coast Range are Luckiamute, Yamhill, and Tualatin Rivers. Minor tributaries, all of which enter main stream from the west, are Marys River, Rickreall Creek, and Long Tom River. Existing project. Flood Control Act of 1938 approved general comprehensive plan for flood control, navigation, and other purposes in Willamette River Basin and authorized $11,300,000 for initiation and partial accomplishment of plan recommended for initial development: the reservoirs and related works to be selected by Chief of Engineers. Subsequent Flood Control Acts, 1941 through 1974, authorized additional flood control and other works and increased monetary authority. (See Table 37-L on Willamette River Basin comprehensive plan, and Table 37-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938, applies to reservoir projects. Local cooperation for other projects is in individual reports for those projects. 37-14 PORTLAND, OREG., DISTRICT Operations and results during fiscal year. See individual reports. Condition at end of fiscal year. Following projects were completed as authorized and in continuous operation: Fern Ridge Lake, August 1951; Cottage Grove Lake, March 1952; Dorena Lake, October 1952; Detroit Lake, December 1960; Lookout Point Lake, June 1961; Hills Creek Lake, June 1963; Cougar Lake, March 1964; Fall Creek Lake, November 1965; Green Peter-Foster Lakes, June-December 1967 respectively; and Blue River Lake, October 1968. Under the authorization for construction of recreation facilities at completed projects, work has been accomplished at Fern Ridge, Cottage Grove, Dorena, Lookout Point, and Fall Creek Lakes. Advance engineering and design for proposed construction of Holley Lake project was placed in deferred status pending completion of a study to determine extent of increased capacity required in Calapooia River for flood control operation of the project. Details of operation, construction, and financial status of projects are in individual reports. During low-water season, July-September, supplemental water releases are made from Willamette River Basin Reservoirs for conservation purposes. Interests which benefit from increased downstream flows include irrigation, navigation, power, pollution abatement, and recreation. Although optimum regulation cannot be provided for every conservation interest, water released from reservoirs during the low-water season for a particular purpose will usually provide benefits to other conservation uses as well. Basic policy is to provide most beneficial overall regulation, consistent with established water-use priorities. 38. WILLAMETTE RIVER BASIN, OREG. - BANK PROTECTION Location. On Willamette River and tributaries, between Cascade Range and Coast Range, from a point south of Eugene to Portland, Oreg. Existing project. Provides for clearing, sloping, and revetting riverbanks; construction of pile and timber bulkheads and drift barriers; minor channel improvements; and maintenance of existing works for control of floods and prevention of erosion at various locations along Willamette River and its tributaries. The current scope of the project is a total of 510,000 linear feet of bank protection. Estimated Federal cost is $34,600,000 (full funding). (See Table 37-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of 1936, applies. Estimated costs for all requirements of local cooperation under terms of project authorization were $402,000 (1981). Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: A total of 8,417 linear feet of riprap revetment bank protection has been constructed at four locations. Maintenance: Annual inspection of revetments was made by helicopter in July 1981. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of project began in 1938 and is 93 percent complete. A total of 475,706 linear feet of bank protection work at 223 locations consisting of revetment of riverbanks, pile and timber bulkheads, drift barriers, and channel improvements, have been completed on Willamette River and tributaries. 39. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Funds appropriated for inspection of completed local flood protection works are used to determine condition of completed works and to ascertain whether those works are being properly maintained by local interests. A total of 103 leveed areas and 258 bank protection works were inspected at various locations along both banks of Lower Columbia River below Bonneville Dam, along Oregon Coast, in eastern Oregon, in southern Oregon and in Willamette River Basin. Of this total, 33 leveed areas in Oregon and 18 leveed areas in Washington along Lower Columbia River; and 37 leveed areas and 16 revetments along Oregon Coast were inspected October 1980 through September 1981. A representative of sponsoring districts accompanied the Portland District representatives performing the levee inspections. Aerial inspection of revetments in Willamette River Basin was supplemented by an onsite inspection at locations requiring maintenance. Deficiencies in maintenance and need for repairs were discussed with sponsoring districts' representatives and a report was made to each sponsor with recommendations for improving maintenance. The campaign to improve maintenance of completed Federal projects initiated by House Appropriations Committee on Civil Functions was continued. Periodic contact was maintained with uncooperative areas reported in FY 1981 to ascertain any change in attitude and to provide technical assistance, if requested. Of the 152 sponsors of local flood protection projects inspected in Portland District, 13 were reported deficient in maintenance. Fiscal year costs were $66,419 and total costs to September 30, 1981 were $816,476. 40. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See Table 37-M. 41. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Cong., as amended (preauthorization). See Table 37-N. Snagging and clearing of navigable streams and tributaries in interest of flood control (Section 208 of 1954 Flood Control Act, Public Law 780, 83rd Cong.). See Table 37-N. Emergency bank protection (Section 14 of 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Cong.). See Table 37-N. Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation). Federal costs for fiscal year were $163,577 for disaster preparedness, $311,787 for emergency operations, and $174,979,300 for advance measures. Cowlitz-Toutle operations. The May 18, 1980 eruption of Mt. St. Helens dramatically altered the hydraulic and hydrologic regimes of the Cowlitz and Toutle river valleys. An estimated 50,000,000 cubic yards of volcanic debris was 37-15 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 initially deposited in the lower 21.5 miles of the Cowlitz River channel, which substantially reduced the river's hydraulic capacity to the point where major flooding could be expected with even normal runoff during the next winter season. For example, at the town of Castle Rock, Wash., located at River Mile 15, the pre-eruption channel capacity (flood stage) of 76,000 cfs had been reduced to about 10,000 cfs, which is approximately one-half of the mean-daily winter time discharge. A major recovery program for the Cowlitz and Toutle rivers funded under advance measures was initiated a short time after the eruption. The twin thrusts of this program were (a) to provide the maximum level of flood protection possible for the 45,000 residents of the lower Cowlitz basin before the onset of the winter 1980-81 flood season, and (b) to initiate effective measures aimed at stabilizing the continuing problem of sediment deposition in the Cowlitz River. The following major activities were initiated under this recovery program: (a) Restoration, through dredging operations, of a channel in the lower 21.5 miles of the Cowlitz River capable of passing 50,000 cubic-feet-per-second (the predisaster channel could convey at least 70,000 cfs before reaching flood stage). (b) Provide additional flood protection to developed areas by raising or extending existing levee systems. Under this program, 14,700 feet of existing levee was raised, and 21,400 feet of new levee was constructed. All levee work was designed to provide 500-year level of protection. (c) Undertake a program aimed at limiting the amount of sediment transported by the Toutle River into the Cowlitz River, where it would tend to deposit and reduce the alreadylimited channel discharge capacity. Under this program, a large temporary Debris Retaining Structure (DRS) was constructed across the upper North Fork of the Toutle River (N-1) and a smaller structure (S-1) was constructed on the South Fork of the Toutle. Once these structures were completed, Operations and Maintenance contracts were let for the removal and placement in disposal areas of accumulated material. Also under this program, a series of Sediment Stabilization Basins (SSBs) were constructed at several locations in the lower Toutle basin. The concept of the SSBs was to remove the heavy volcanic ash deposits that clogged the flood plain areas of the lower Toutle basin, and thereby prevent this material from being retransported down the river during subsequent episodes of high water, and at the same time develop a number of sediment traps where additional sediment infill could be collected for later removal. (d) Another major element of the Mt. St. Helens Recovery Program called for the acquisition, on a temporary basis, of additional flood control storage behind the Mossyrock hydroelectric project located in the upper Cowlitz basin. This additional flood control storage capacity would provide some regulation of peak discharges downstream, so that damage from the smaller more frequently-occurring floods could be prevented while levee raising and other actions were underway. (e) The last major element of this program consisted of providing outlet channels for new lakes that had formed in the mouths ofJackson, Coldwater and South Castle Creeks on the upper North Fork Toutle River as a result of the enormous debris avalanche deposit placed there by the eruption, which blocked all tributary drainages. The development of controlled outlet channels for these lakes prevented them from continuing to rise until they overtopped the avalanche deposits that confined them and produced major flooding in the Toutle and Cowlitz valleys. By the end of FY 1981, most of the work described above had been completed. A total of 56,000 cubic yards of volcanic debris had been excavated from the lower 21.5 miles of the Cowlitz river in the process of opening up and maintaining a 50,000 cfs channel through the first post-eruption winter flood season. Toutle River excavation from behind the DRS's and SSB's totaled 18,890,000 cubic yards. All excavation contracts had been completed by the end of the fiscal year. Total payments and funding commitments by the end of the fiscal year, with some contract modifications remaining to be negotiated, totaled $226,668,000. The authorized navigation channel on the Cowlitz between River Mile 0 and 4.2 remains unusable due to continued sedimentation. Reservoirs 42. APPLEGATE LAKE, ROGUE RIVER BASIN, OREG. Location. In Jackson County, Oreg., on Upper Applegate River, a tributary of Rogue River, at River Mile 45.7, about 23 airline miles southwest of Medford, Oreg. Existing project. Provides for a gravel filled embankment dam, 242 feet high from streambed to crest with an overall length of 1,300 feet. A gate-controlled concrete chute-type spillway on the right abutment, and a regulating outlet conduit, and intake tower with multilevel intakes on the left side of valley floor. Lake, 4.6 miles long, provides 75,000 acre-feet of usable storage for flood control and water conservation utilization. Project controls runoff from a drainage area of 223 square miles. In addition to flood control, reservoir is operated to provide irrigation, fish and wildlife enhancement, water quality control, and recreation benefits. Estimated cost of project is $95,500,000 (full funding), including $3,679,000 estimated for recreation facilities which will be constructed by the Corps of Engineers and operated and maintained by the U.S. Forest Service. (See Table 37-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Authorizing act requires that State of Oregon take action, prior to construction, to insure maintenance in stream of flows to be released for fishery. In addition, costs allocated to irrigation would have to be repaid in amanner and to an extent consistent with reclamation laws and policies. Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife made filing May 31, 1962 with State Engineer for water rights for use of stored water and natural flows for fish habitat improvement in amounts and at times specified in project authorization. The Water and Power Resources Service is currently making a feasibility study of Applegate Irrigation Division. Local interests have furnished all local cooperation specified by the 1970 Flood Control Act. The assurances were approved by the Secretary of the Army on May 8, 1975. Operations and results during fiscal year. The main dam, spillway and intake structure was completed in the fall of 1980. Initial filling began in December 1980. Some miscellaneous contracts for restoration are still in progress. The name of Grouse Creek Park was changed to Hart-Tish Park by the U.S. Forest Service. Planning for the remaining recreation facilities and other miscellaneous items continues. Initial land acquisition funds were received in March 1974 and acquisition work continued through 1981. Freshets regulated by Applegate Lake on Applegate River and Rogue River are shown in Table 37-I. Condition at end of fiscal year. Design memorandums approved are: site selection; hydrology and meteorology; reloca- 37-16 PORTLAND, OREG., DISTRICT tions; general; real estate; land requirements plan-public use; Lower Applegate Road and detour supplement; spillway, outlet works and fish facilities; clearing and geology, foundations and embankment design; concrete aggregate, relocations of power and telephone lines, master plan and Hart-Tish Park. Final Environmental Impact Statement and Supplements Nos. 1 and 2, were filed with Council on Environmental Quality February 15, 1972, July 21, 1972, and August 24, 1976, respectively. Supplement No. 3of the final EIS was filed with EPA December 23, 1977. An environmental assessment addressing primarily the redesign of the embankment, spillway, intake tower and regulating outlet, was published in January 1978. Another environmental assessment addressingthe design changes for the Upper Applegate Road and U.S. Forest Service roads was published in April 1979. Contract for the Upper Applegate Road was awarded in July 1979 and is now completed. Main dam contract was awarded May 1978 and is 99 percent complete. U.S. Forest Service road contract awarded February 1980 was completed in May 1981. Construction on McKee and Murphy Fish Passage facilities was initiated in July 1980 and was completed in FY 1981. The U.S. Forest Service has taken over the operation and maintenance of all but the operational facilities of this project. 43. BLUE RIVER LAKE, OREG. Location. On Blue River, a major tributary of McKenzie River, 1.7 miles above confluence of the two streams at the confluence of Quartz Creek and Blue River and about 38 miles easterly of Eugene, Oreg. Existing project. A gravel-fill embankment dam 1,329 feet long at crest including spillway and 319 feet above the lowest point of the general foundation. A concrete gravity chute-type spillway with two gates is located on left abutment. Outlet works are in left abutment. On left shore of reservoir an earth-andgravel fill embankment, about 1,535 feet long and 70 feet high, closes a low saddle between Blue River and McKenzie River. Project controls runoff from drainage area of 88 square miles. Reservoir provides 85,000 acre-feet of usable flood control storage and is operated as a unit of coordinated reservoir system to protect Willamette River Valley and increase low waterflows for navigation and other purposes. Recreation facilities are provided by the U.S. Forest Service under a Memorandum of Agreement. (See Table 37-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance work performed. Freshets regulated by Blue River Lake project on Blue River, a major tributary of McKenzie River, are shown in Table 37-I. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in May 1963 and operation for flood control was effective in October 1968. Settlement of claims was completed in May 1974. 44. COTTAGE GROVE LAKE, OREG. Location. On Coast Fork of Willamette River, 29miles from mouth. Coast Fork rises in Douglas County, Oreg., on western slope of Cascade Range and northern slope of Calapooia Range, flows north for 49 miles, and unites with Middle Fork to form main Willamette River. Existing project. An earthfill dam, 1,750 feet long at crest, 114 feet high from lowest pointof the general foundation, a concrete gravity free overflow spillway 264 feet long near the right abutment, and a concrete gravity non-overflow section 96 feet long forming the right abutment. Total length of dam is 2,110 feet. Outlet works, consisting of three gate-controlled conduits, pass through spillway section. Reservoir provides 30,060 acre-feet of usable flood control storage and controls runoff of drainage areaof 104 square miles. Project is operated as a unit of coordinated reservoir system to protect Willamette River Valley and increase low waterflow for navigation and for other purposes. Recreational development consists of day use and overnight facilities at four sites operated by the Corps of Engineers. (See Table 37-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. No cost-sharing sponsor for recreation facilities has expressed an interest in this project. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance work performed. Freshets regulated by Cottage Grove Lake on Coast Fork Willamette River are shown in Table 37-I. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of project initiated August 1940 was completed April 1952 except for construction of additional recreation facilities funded from Recreation Facilities at Completed Projects. Initiated construction for rest room facilities were essentially completed during FY 1981. Dam and reservoir have been in continuous operation since September 1942. 45. DAYS CREEK LAKE, OREG. Location. In Douglas County on South Umpqua River, 60 miles from its junction with North Umpqua River, 172 miles from mouth of Umpqua River, and one mile upstream from the town of Days Creek. Existing project. Plan provides for a gravel embankment dam, 254 feet high from lowest point of foundation to crest and 1,031 feet long; a concrete gravity spillway on the right abutment with five electrically operated tainter gates; and regulating outlet works under the center of the dam. Reservoir will provide for 260,000 acre-feet of multiple-use storage for flood control, irrigation, fishery enhancement, water supply, recreation and water quality improvement and will control 640 square miles of drainage area. Authorization is for Phase I Advance Engineering and Design only. (See Table 37-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests will be required to adopt, prior to project construction, land-use regulations which would prevent encroachment of future development on the floodway. Douglas County Commission has indicated willingness to adopt appropriate land-use regulations prior to project construction. Costs allocated to irrigation would have to be repaid in a manner and to an extent consistent with reclamation laws and policies. All construction, operation and maintenance, replacement and interests costs allocated to water supply will have to be reimbursed. Assurances of present intent to make future use of water stored in Days Creek Lake have been received from potential water users. In accordance with Water Resources Project Recreation Act of 1965 (PL 89-72), a non-Federal public entity must assume 50 percent of the separable costs of project recreational lands and facilities for construction and 100 percent for the annual operation, maintenance and replacement costs, except that, as amended by Water 37-17 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 Resources Development Act of 1974, only 25 percent of separable costs for fish enhancement are reimbursable. Douglas County and the city of Roseburg have provided premilinary assurances that they would participate in planned recreation development. Operations and results during fiscal year. None. Condition at end of fiscal year. Final EIS was filed with CEQ October 6, 1972. Phase I planning has been terminated and study was reclassified as "deferred" on February 22,1980. 46. DORENA LAKE, OREG. Location. On Row River, Oreg., 7 miles from mouth. Row River rises in Lane County on western slope of Cascade Range, flows northwest for 19 miles, and enters Coast Fork of Willamette River 19.5 miles above mouth. Existingproject. An earthfill embankment dam, 3,352 feet long at crest and 145 feet high from lowest point of the general foundation. Concrete gravity free-overflow spillway, 200 feet long, forms right abutment. Outlet works on five slide-gatecontrolled conduits pass through spillway section. Reservoir provides 70,500 acre-feet of usable flood control storage and controls runoff of 265 square miles, practically entire drainage area utary to Row River. Project is operated as a unit of coordinated reservoir system to protect Willamette River Valley and increase low waterflows for navigation and other purposes. (See Table 37-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Future recreational development is contingent upon a cost-sharing agreement with a non-Federal sponsor. Lane County Parks is participating in a multiple project cost-sharing (50 percent) contract, for many of the existing parks at four projects, including Dorena Lake. Operation and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance work performed. Freshets regulated by Dorena Lake project on Row and Coast Fork Willamette Rivers are shown in Table 37-I. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of project initiated June 1941 was completed October 1952 except for construction of additional recreation facilities to be funded from Recreation Facilities at Completed Projects. Work continued in FY 1981 on plans and specifications for construction of rest room facilities at Schwarz Park. Future recreation facilities construction will be accomplished in accordance with the cost-sharing contract with Lane County, Oregon. Dam and reservoir have been in continuous operation since November 1949. 47. ELK CREEK LAKE, ROGUE RIVER BASIN, OREG. Location. InJackson County, Oreg. at River Mile 1.7 on Elk Creek, a tributary of Rogue River, about 26.5 miles northerly from Medford, Oreg. Existing project. Plan provides for a rock and gravel embankment dam, 233 feet high from streambed to crest with an overall length of 2,685 feet. A gate-controlled concrete chute-type spillway on the right abutment, and a regulating outlet tunnel and intake tower with multilevel intakes will be in left abutment. Reservoir 6.2 miles long will provide 95,000 acre-feet of usable storage for flood control and water conservation utilization. Project will control runoff from a drainage area of 127 square miles. Reservoir will be operated to provide future municipal and industrial water supply, irrigation, fish and wildlife enhancement, water quality control, and recreation benefits. Estimated Federal costof project is $120,000,000 (1981). (See Table 37-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Authorizing act requires that State of Oregon take action prior to construction to insure maintenance in stream of flow to be released for fishery. In addition, costs allocated to irrigation would have to be repaid in a manner and to an extent consistent with the Water and Power Resources Service laws and policies. On February 24, 1966 State of Oregon Water Resources Board filed for withdrawal rights of 25 cfs to maintain minimum flow for fish. The Water and Power Resources Service is preparing a feasibility study for irrigation of Medford Division from Lost Creek and Elk Creek Lakes, and will determine repayment requirements by local interests. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Administration of project land continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project was initiated in July 1972. Final environmental statement was filed with CEQ June 15,1972. The Oregon Water Policy Review Board voted October 3, 1975 not to support the Elk Creek project. On April 4, 1981 the Board reversed its previous position and voted to support Elk Creek project. 48. FALL CREEK LAKE, OREG. Location. On Fall Creek, a tributary of Middle Fork Willamette River, about 7 miles above confluence of the streams and about 19 miles southeasterly of Eugene, Oreg. Existing project. An earth-and-gravel fill embankment about 5,100 feet long at crest and 193 feet high from lowest point of the general foundation. A gated concrete gravity spillway is in left abutment. Outlet is in right abutment. Reservoir provides 115,000 acre-feet of usable flood control storage and is operated as a unit of coordinated reservoir system to protect Willamette River Valley and increase low waterflows for navigation and other purposes. (See Table 37-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Additional recreational development is contingent upon a cost-sharing agreement with a non-Federal sponsor. Lane County Parks is participating in a multiple project cost-sharing (50 percent) contract for many of the existing parks at four projects, including Fall Creek Lake. Also, Bethel School District is cost-sharing 50 percent for Sky Camp. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance work performed. Freshets regulated by Fall Creek Lake projecton Fall Creek, atributary of Middle Fork, Willamette River, are shown in Table 37-I. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of project began May 1962 and was essentially complete November 1965. Reservoir storage for flood control was effective October 1965. Sky Camp Lodge was completed October 1978. Future recrea- 37-18 PORTLAND, OREG., DISTRICT tion facilities will be provided in accordance with the costsharing contracts with Lane County and Bethel School District, federally funded from Recreation Facilities at Completed Projects. 49. FERN RIDGE LAKE, OREG. Location. On Long Tom River, 23.6 miles from the mouth. Long Tom River rises in Lane County, Oreg., on eastern slope of Coast Range, flows north for 50 miles, and enters Willamette River 147 miles above its mouth. Existing project. A main dam, 6,624 feet long at crest and 49 feet high from lowest point of the general foundation and two auxiliary dikes, 915 and 3,929 feet long, along northeasterly boundary of lake. Main dam consists of an earthfill embankment dam 6,330 feet long, a concrete gravity spillway near left abutment with a non-overflow structure 46 feet long, containing outlet works, and an overflow structure, 248 feet long, controlled by six automatic gates. Project includes rectification of channel of Long Tom River downstream of dam. Reservoir provides 110,000 acre-feet of usable flood control storage and controls runoff of tributary drainage area of 275 square miles. Reservoir protects Long Tom River Valley and is operated as a unit of coordinated reservoir system to protect Willamette River Valley generally and to increase low waterflows for navigation and other purposes. Dam was originally constructed in 1941 to height of 47 feet. Provision of additional storage for flood control was obtained in 1965 by raising embankments 2 feet to 49 feet above lowest point of the general foundation. (See Table 37-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Additional recreational development is contingent upon a cost-sharing agreement with a non-Federal sponsor. Lane County Parks is participating in a multiple project cost-sharing (50 percent) contract for many of the existing parks at four projects, including Fern Ridge Lake. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance work performed. Freshets regulated by Fern Ridge Lake project on Long Tom River are shown in Table 37-I. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of project initiated April 1940 was completed August 1951, except for provision of additional storage for flood control authorized in 1962 and completed April 1965, and construction of additional recreation facilities to be funded from Recreation Facilities at Completed Projects. Dam and reservoir have been in continuous operation since December 1941. Development of recreation facilities in accordance with the cost-sharing contract with Lane County continues. 50. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS Corps of Engineers monitored flood control operations at four Water and Power Resources Service projects (Prineville, Ochoco, Emigrant, and Scoggins)and(Mossyrock) a municipal power project operated by Tacoma City Light. Under licensing agreement, the TacomaCity Light utility is required to provide 360,000 acre-feet of flood storage by December of each year. Because of the need for early flood storage to meet changed winter runoff, conditions caused by the Mt. St. Helens eruption and mudflows, special arrangements were made to obtain the required storage by October 1, 1980 with an additional 240,000 acre-feet obtained by November 1, 1980. Increased storage capability was required to control flows a C astle Rock to 50,000 cubic feet per second instead of the normal regulation goal of 70,000 cubic feet per second for prevention of downstream flood damages. The Bureau of Reclamation projects were partially constructed with flood control funds, thereby subjecting project operation to monitoring by the Corps of Engineers under Section 7, Flood Control Act of 1944. Monitoring of Mossyrock flood control operation is assigned to the Corps by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission as the Mossyrock license calls for specific flood control regulation. The Bureau of Reclamation sponsored projects during Fiscal Year 1981 were operated satisfactorily for flood control. At Mossyrock, two winter highwater periods occurred in December 1980 and February 1981 with the major highwater occuring in late December. The spring snowmelt runoff was near normal. During the highwater period, reservoir regulation stored approximately 305,600 acre-feet at Mossyrock. Peak discharges at Castle Rock were observed to be 44,600 cubic feet per second, well below the regulation goal of 50,000 cubic feet per second. Without the additional storage, Castle Rock could have been regulated to 57,500 cubic feet per second. Unregulated flow would have been 94,800 cubic feet per second. All reservoirs filled to normal full pool levels during the refill season. Preparation of reservoir Regulation Manuals for Scoggins and Mossyrock projects is scheduled. Total cost of monitoring the five projects during Fiscal Year 1981 was $3,050. Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 51. BONNEVILLE LOCK AND DAM-LAKE BONNEVILLE, OREG. AND WASH. Location. Project is on Columbia River, 40 miles east of Portland, Oreg., about 146 miles above mouth of river. For description of Columbia River see Improvement No. 2. Existing project. A dam, powerplant, and lock for power and navigation. Spillway dam extends across main channel from Washington shore to Bradford Island, which divides the river at this point. Overflow crest at 24 feet above mean sea level is surmounted by 18 vertical-lift steel gates and 10 remoted main dam hoists placed between piers which extend to elevation 99 feet where a service roadway permits operation of two 350-ton gantry cranes for regulating gates. Powerhouse extending across Bradford Slough to Oregon shore has an installation of 10 units, consisting of two units of 43,200 kilowatts and eight units of 54,000 kilowatts each, totaling 518,400 kilowatts. Ordinary and extreme fluctuations of river at lower lock gate are about21 and 47 feet respectively. Project includes fish ladders and locks to serve both main channel and Bradford Slough channel. Navigation lock and powerhouse are founded on andesite, and main dam rests upon solidified sedimentary rock of volcanic origin. Pool created by dam provides a navigable channel with a depth of 15 feet and over between Bonneville and The Dalles Dams, a distance of 47 river miles. Principal data concerning navigation lock spillway dam, and powerplant are set forth in Table 37-0. Dam, navigation lock, 10-unit power generating installation, fishways, and attendant buildings and grounds cost $83,239,395, 37-19 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 of which $6,072,480 is for navigation facilities, $39,350,824 for power facilities and $37,816,091 for joint facilities, consisting of dam, fishways, buildngs and grounds, and headwall section of power units 0 to 6, cost of which $2,106,000 is allocated to dam and lake facilities. (See Table 37-B for authorizing legislation.) In response to flow regulations and peakings from upstream plants operating under conditions of Canadian storage and Pacific Northwest - Southwest Intertie, two modifications were undertaken at the Bonneville project. The modification for peaking project was undertaken to minimize adverse environmental effects under rapidly changing flow conditions from upstream dams. The project was completed in 1978 at a cost of $27,195,000. The second modification provides for increased power installation by building a second powerhouse located on the Washington shore adjacent to the end of the existing spillway. The new powerhouse will contain eight units of 66,500 kilowatts each and two fish turbine generator units of 13,100 kilowatts each for a capacity of 558,200 kilowatts, bringing the total Bonneville capacity to 1,076.6 megawatts. Additional fish facilities consist of the powerhouse collection system, second fish ladder on the Washington shore, transportation channel connecting existing Washington shore fish ladder with new exit control section, and fingerling bypass facilities which include fish screens in both the second and existing powerhouses. To provide for the anticipated increased visitor use, onsite visitor facilities are included. Under authority of the Bonneville Project Act (August 20, 1937), a letter from Bonneville Power Administration to North Pacific Division dated January 21, 1965, requested construction of a second powerhouse. Estimated cost for construction of second powerhouse is $674,000,000 (full funding). Local cooperation. None required, except for non-Federal cost-sharing for development of Recreation Facilities at Completed Projects. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Contract for main turbine was awarded October 1976 and is 99 percent complete. Contract for powerhouse excavation was awarded March 1977 and is complete. The main powerhouse contract was awarded April 1978 and is 99 percent complete. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance was performed during period. During the fiscal year 4,758,701,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical power energy were generated, of which 4,742,691,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Traffic through the navigation lock consisting of rafted logs, petroleum products, grains, and miscellaneous cargo amounted to 8,931,854 tons during calendar year 1981. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of project started October 1933, was completed February 1953. Modification of powerhouse control equipment started March 1957, was completed September 1958. Firsttwo power units were placed in operation during fiscal year 1938. Powerhouse with complete installation of 10 units, was in operation December 1943. Construction of modification for peaking work commenced in September 1970 and was completed in September 1978. Construction of second powerhouse is underway. Final environmental impact statement was filed with Council on Environmental Quality in April 1972. In response to increasing visitation which now exceeds 800,000 a year at the dam site itself and 1,500,000 project-wide, avisitor center with windows into the fish ladders, a 60-seat theatre, exhibits and displays was completed in 1975. Contracts for relocation of the highway, railroad and town of North Bonneville as well as excavation of the powerhouse are 99 percent complete. Construction of the main powerhouse and supply contracts for associated powerhouse equipment are 98 percent complete and Units 17 and 18 were on-line by September 22, 1981. The visitor facility for the new powerhouse (which does not require cost-sharing) will be constructed as an integral part of that structure. Construction of future recreational facilities is contingent upon a cost-sharing contract with a non-Federal sponsor. Washington State Parks has indicated an interest in costsharing at a number of projects including Bonneville Lock and Dam; however, a cost-sharing contract has not been consummated. Through September 1981 power generation totaled 161.9 billion kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville Power Administration, $127,834,450 was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. 52. COUGAR LAKE, OREG. Location. At mile 4.4 on South Fork McKenzie River which joins McKenzie River about 56.5 miles above its confluence with Willamette River. Project is about 42 mileseastof Eugene, Oreg. Existing project. A rockfiil dam with an impervious earth core, about 1,738 feet long at crest and 445 feet high above the streambed. Reservoir is 6 miles long with storage capacity at full pool of 219,000 acre-feet and controls runoff of tributary drainage area of 210 square miles. Spillway is on right abutment and outlet and power tunnels in left abutment. Outlet tunnel is provided with a chute and stilling basin. Powerplant consists of two 12,500 kilowatt units with minimum provisions for installing athird unitof 35,000 kilowatts for future peaking capacity. Improvement functions as a unit in coordinated system of reservoirs for multiple-purpose development of water resources in Willamette River Basin. Recreation facilities are provided by the U.S. Forest Service. Also authorized (but unconstructed) is a reregulating dam, Strube Lake, below Cougar Lake which would permit Cougar to operate as a peaking powerplant. The Strube dam would contain two units totalling 4,600 kilowatts. Estimated Federal cost of Strube Lake and Cougar Additional Unit is $106,000,000 (full funding). (See Table 37-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Costs for power are reimbursable from power revenues. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance continued. During fiscal year, 129,229,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical energy were generated at project, of which 128,599,000 kilowatt-hours were elivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Freshets regulated by Cougar Lake on South Fork McKenzie River are shown on Table 37-I. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of project initiated June 1956 is complete, excluding Strube Lake and Cougar Additional Unit for which planning is essentially complete. Also, plans and specifications for the first construction contract (relocations) have been completed. Generating units 1 and 2 were placed in commercial operation March 23 and February 4, 1964, respectively. Physical in-service date for flood control was November 29, 1963. Through September 1981 power generation totaled 2.3 billion kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville Power Administration, $11,122,550 was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. 37-20 PORTLAND, OREG., DISTRICT 53. DETROIT LAKE, OREG. Location. On North Santiam River with dam 50 miles from mouth and 45 miles southeast of Salem, Oreg. North Santiam River flows north and west for 85 miles, and unites with South Santiam River to form Santiam River, which 10 miles downstream enters Willamette River 108 miles above its mouth. Existing project. One main dam and a reregulating dam, both with power-generating facilities. Detroit Dam is a concrete gravity structure about 1,522 feet long and 454 feet high from lowest point of the general foundation to roadway deck. Spillway is a gate-controlled overflow section, and outlet works are gate-controlled conduits through dam. Powerhouse with two units having a capacity of 50,000 kilowatts each is in right abutment immediately below dam. Reservoir has a storage capacity at full pool of 454,900 acre-feet and controls runoff of tributary drainage areaof 438 square miles. It is being operated as a unit in coordinated reservoir system to protect Willamette Valley from floods, to increase low water flows in interestof havigation and irrigation, to generate power, and for other purposes. Reregulating dam 3 miles downstream at Big Cliff site is concrete gravity type, about 191 feet high from lowest point of the general foundation to roadway deck. Power installation consists of one unit with a capacity of 18,000 kilowatts. Reservoir has a storage capacity of 5,930 acre-feet at full pool. Project is a unit of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in Willamette Basin. Recreation facilities are provided by the U.S. Forest Service, Oregon State Park System and the town of Detroit. (See Table 37-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance continued. During fiscal year 461,935,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical energy were generated at project of which 430,190,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Freshets regulated by the Detroit Lake project on North Santiam River are shown in Table 37-I. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of project begun in May 1947 was completed December 1960. The two powerhouse generating units were placed in commercial operation June and October 1953. At Big Cliff powerhouse, single generating unit was placed on-line June 1954. Use of Big Cliff Dam for reregulating fluctuating flow from Detroit units was effected October 1953. Contract was completed for new surface on Detroit powerhouse approach road, on July 17,1981. Through September 1981 power generation totaled 13.5 billion kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville Power Administration, $14,393,300 was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. 54. GREEN PETER-FOSTER LAKES, OREG. Location. At approximate mile 5.5 on Middle Santiam River which joins South Santiam River about 56.8 miles above its confluence with Willamette River. Dam is about 30 miles southeast of Albany in Linn County, Oreg. Existing project. One main dam and a reregulating dam, both with power-generating facilities. Green Peter Dam is a concrete gravity structure, 1,400 feet long and 385 feet high above the lowest point of the general foundation with a gatecontrolled spillway. Outlet works consist of two conduits through spillway, discharging into a stilling basin. Powerplant, on right bank adjacent to spillway stilling basin, consists of two units with an installed capacity of 80,000 kilowatts. Reservoir provides storage capacity at full pool of 430,000 acre-feet, extending 6.5 miles up Quartzville Creek and some 7.5 miles up Middle Santiam River above creek junction, forming a Y-shaped pool. Reservoir controls runoff of tributary drainage area of 277 square miles. Foster Dam, 7 miles downstream from Green Peter Dam is located on South Santiam River about 38 miles above its confluence with Santiam River and 1.5 miles below its confluence with Middle Santiam River. Foster Dam consists of an earth, gravel, and rock-filled embankment, 146 feet high from lowest point of the general foundation and a concrete gravity gate-controlled spillway and stilling basin for atotal length of 4,800 feet. Power installation consists of two units with a capacity of 20,000 kilowatts. Foster Lake has a storage capacity, at full pool, of 61,000 acre-feet. Project functions as a unit in coordinated system of reservoirs for multiple-purpose development of water resources in Willamette River Basin. (See Table 37-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Future recreational development other than health, safety and general access is contingent upon a signed cost-sharing agreement with a local non-Federal sponsor. None has been signed to date. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance being performed. During the fiscal year 349,008,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical energy were generated at project of which 345,629,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Freshets regulated by Green Peter Lake project on Middle Santiam River are shown in Table 37-I. Condition at end of fiscal year. All construction on Green Peter-Foster Lakes project initiated June 1961 is completed. Green Peter Lake was placed in operation for useful flood control June 1967 as a unit of coordinated reservoir system for protection of the Willamette River Basin. First power-generation unitwas placed on the lineJune 9, 1967 and second, June 28, 1967. Use of Foster Lake for reregulating fluctuating flows from Green Peter units was effective December 1967. First power generation unit was placed on-line August 22, 1968 and second, September 6, 1968. Through September 1981 power generation totaled 4.8 billion kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville Power Administration, $24,199,250 was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. 55. HILLS CREEK LAKE, OREG. Location. On the Middle Fork, Willamette River, 47.8 miles from mouth and 26.5 miles upstream from Lookout Point Dam. Middle Fork, Willamette River rises on west slope of Cascade Range and flows northwesterly to its junction with Coast Fork, Willamette River. Dam is about 45 miles southeast from Eugene, Oreg. Existingproject. An earth-and-gravel-fill dam about2,150 feet long at the crest and 338 feet above lowest point of the general foundation. A gate-controlled concrete gravity chutetype spillway is in right abutment. Diversion tunnel, outlet tunnel and power tunnel are in same abutment. Powerhouse 37-21 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 with two 15,000 kilowatt units is located next to spillway. Hills Creek Lake is about 8.5 miles long and provides storage capacity at full pool of 356,000 acre-feet. Project controls runoff of drainage area of 389 square miles and is an integral unit of comprehensive plan for development of water resources of Willamette River Basin. Hills Creek Lake and Lookout Point Lake are operated as a unit for control of floods and generation of power on Middle Fork Willamette River. These projects, in conjunction with Dexter reregulating dam and Fall Creek Lake flood control system, will effectively control floods on Middle Fork and provide maximum efficient generation of hydroelectric power. Recreation facilities are provided by the U.S. Forest Service. (See Table 37-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Ordinary operation and maintenance continued. During fiscal year 146,745,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical power were generated, of which 146,231,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Bonne ville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Freshets regulated by Hills Creek Lake on Middle Fork Willamette River are shown in Table 37-I. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of project, initiated May 1956, was completed June 1963. The project was placed in service for useful flood control in November 1961. On May 2, 1962, the two power generation units were placed on-line. Through September 1981 power generation totaled 2.9 billion kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville Power Administration, $11,703,700 was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. 56. JOHN DAY LOCK AND DAM-LAKE UMATILLA, OREG. AND WASH. Location. On Columbia River about 3 miles downstream from mouth of John Day River and about 215 miles above mouth of Columbia River. Existing project. A dam, powerplant, navigation lock, fish ladders, and appurtenant facilities with a slack-water lake about 75 miles long extending to McNary Lock and Dam. Included is relocation of railroads, highways, utilities, and communities affected by the impoundment. The project as originally authorized would have provided 2,000,000 acre-feet of flood control storage. As modified, the project provides 500,000 acre-feet of flood control storage between elevations 257 and 268. The structure is 5,900 feet in length and stands about 161 feet above streambed. Powerhouse has space for 20 generating units of 135,000 kilowatts each; 16 units have been installed for a present capacity of 2,160,000 kilowatts. Principal project data are set forth in Table 37-0. A detailed description of project as authorized and modified is on pages 1992 and 1993 of Annual Report for 1962 under the Walla Walla District. Estimated Federal cost of new work is $520,333,000(full funding), consistingof $520,000,000 Corpsof Engineers funds and $333,000 for Coast Guard navigation aids. (See Table 37-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Contract for modification of Spring Creek Hatchery is physically complete. Operation and maintenance: Duringfiscalyear 11,140,621,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical power were generated by the 16 generating units of which 11,123,276,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Traffic through the navigation lock, consisting of petroleum products, grains, and miscellaneous cargo, amounted to 7,709,157 tons during calendar year 1980. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began July 1958, and the project was opened to navigation April 1968. Sixteen generating units of 135,000 kilowatts each are producing a total output of 2,160,000 kilowatts. Main dam completion contract is complete. Remainder of the project is essentially complete except for the service building. A survey report and design memorandum for the rehabilitation of the navigation lock was completed in FY 1979. Plans and specifications were completed and rehabilitation work begun in the second quarter FY 1980 and is 99 percent complete. The estimated cost for the rehabilitation is $7,200,000 (full funding). Entire project is estimated to be 93 percent complete. Through September 1981 power generation totaled 136.3 billion kilowatt- hours. Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville Power Administration $144,366,400 was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. 57. LOOKOUT POINT LAKE, OREG. Location. On Middle Fork, Willamette River at Meridian site, 21.3 miles from mouth. Middle Fork, Willamette River, rises in Lane County on western slope of Cascade Range and flows northwesterly to its junction with Coast Fork, which is head of main stem Willamette River. Dam is about 22 miles southeast from Eugene, Oreg. Existing project. A main dam at Meridian site and a reregulating dam 3 miles downstream at Dexter site. Both dams are earth-and-gravel-fills with concrete spillways and have power generating facilities. Main dam is 258 feet high from lowest point of the general foundation to deck and is 3,381 feet long at crest forming a reservoir 14.2 miles long providing storage of 456,000 acre-feet at full-pool level. Reservoir controls runoff of tributary drainage areaof 991 square miles. Spillway, 274 feet long, is a gate-controlled overflow type, forming right abutment. Outlet works consisting of slide-gate-controlled conduits pass through spillway section. Powerhouse has three main generating units with a capacity of 120,000 kilowatts. Reregulating dam has a maximum height of 107 feet above lowest point of the general foundation and is 2,765 feet long at crest, forming a full pool of 27,500 acre-feet extending upstream to main dam and providing pondage to regulate Lookout Point powerhouse water releases to a uniform discharge. Spillway consists of a gate-controlled overflow section 509 feet long forming right abutment. Flow regulation is accomplished by use of spillway gates and releases through powerhouse, which contains one 15,000-kilowatt unit. Lookout Point and Dexter Lakes are operated as a single unit of a coordinated system of reservoirs to protect Willamette River Valley against floods, to provide needed hydroelectric power, and to increase low water flows for navigation, irrigation, and other purposes. Existing project authorized as a unit of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in Willamette River Basin. (See Table 37-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Additional recreational development is contingent upon a cost-sharing agreement with a non-Federal sponsor. Lane County Parks is participating in a multiple 37-22 PORTLAND, OREG., DISTRICT project cost-sharing (50 percent) contract for many of the existing parks at four projects, including Lookout Point- Dexter. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance continued. During fiscal year 353,308,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical power energy were generated at project of which 351,794,000 kilowatt-hours were deliver ed to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Freshets regulated by Lookout Point Lake project on Middle Fork Willamette River are shown in Table 37-I. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of project initiated May 1947 was completed June 1961, except for construction of addtional recreation facilities to be funded from Recreation Facilities at Completed Projects. Future recreation facilities will be provided in accordance with the cost-sharing contract with Lane County. At Lookout Point powerhouse, generating units 1, 2 and 3 were placed in commercial operation December 1954, February 1955, and April 1955, respectively. At Dexter powerhouse the single unit was placed on-line May 1955. Use of Dexter Lake for reregulating fluctuating flows from Lookout Point units was effected in December 1954. Through September 1981 power generation totaled 10.7 billion kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville Power Administration, $43,933,600 was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. 58. LOST CREEK LAKE, ROGUE RIVER BASIN, OREG. Location. On upper Rogue River at mile 153.6 about 30 miles northeasterly from Medford, Oreg. Existing project. A rock and gravel-fill embankment dam about 327 feet high from streambed to crest, with an overall length of 3,750 feet with an impervious earth core and a gatecontrolled concrete spillway. Powerhouse is on right abutment and houses two Francis-type turbines with installed capacity of 24,500 kilowatts each. Regulating outlet facility with provisions for temperature regulation for releases in interest of fishery enhancement is also on right bank. Reservoir 10 miles long provides 315,000 acre-feet of usable storage. Project provides control of runoff of drainage area of 674 square miles. In addition to hydroelectric power generation, project provides flood control, irrigation, future municipal and industrial (M&I) water supply, fish and wildlife enhancement, water quality control and recreation benefits. Federal cost of new work is $135,863,450. (See Table 37-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Authorizing act required that local agencies furnish assurances prior to construction that demands will be made for future use of water supply storage within a period that will permit repayment of costs, including interest, allocated to water supply within life of the project; that State of Oregon take action, prior to construction to insure maintenance in stream of flows to be released for fishery; in addition, costs allocated to irrigation would havetobe repaid in manner and to an extent consistent with reclamation laws and policies; and costs allocated to power will be repaid on a system basis by revenue from sales of power in Pacific Northwest Federal system by Bonneville Power Administration. A survey in September, 1980 of M&I water supply needs showed nine communities with water supply needs. A contract for M&I supply is presently being developed with oneof the communities. Assurances for municipal and industrial water supply were obtained from six communities in Rogue River Valley. On February 26, 1966 Oregon State Department of Fish and Wildlife agreed to operate Rogue River hatchery for mitigation and enhancement of fish. The Water and Power Resources Service is preparing feasibility study for irrigation of Medford Division from Lost Creek and Elk Creek Lakes and repayment by local interests for cost allocated to irrigation will be repaid over a period not to exceed 50 years, exclusive of a development period of up to 10 years. A cost allocation is presently being developed by the Portland District for all of the purposes for which water is used which includes power, flood control, fishery enhancement, M&I water supply, irrigation and recreation. Operations and results during fiscal year. During fiscal year 237,036,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical power energy were generated at project of which 234,789,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Freshets regulated by Lost Creek Lake on Rogue River are shown in Table 37-I. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of project initiated July 1967 is complete. Generating units 1 and 2 were placed in commercial operation July 6 and July 13, 1977, respectively. Physical in-service date for flood control was February 18, 1977. Final environmental statement was filed with Council on Environmen tal Quality in June 1972. Through September 1981 power generation totaled 1.1 billion kilowatthours. Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville Power Administration, $4,638,350 was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. 59. THE DALLES LOCK AND DAMLAKE CELILO, WASH. AND OREG. Location. On Columbia River at head of pool behind Bonneville Dam, about 193 miles above mouth of river and 90 miles east of Portland, Oreg. Existing project. A dam, powerplant, navigation lock, and appurtenant facilities. Improvement provides for navigation and hydroelectric power generation. Dam is designed for a normal pool at elevation 160 feet at mean sea level. Normal pool forms a reservoir extending upstream about 25 miles providing slackwater to John Day Dam site. The Dalles Dam is 8,700 feet long and consists of a rock, gravel, and sand river closure section from Oregon shore connecting to a nonoverflow section which in turn joins powerhouse, then concrete nonoverflow sections connecting spillway with powerhouse and spillway with navigation lock at right abutmenton Washington shore. Fish-passing facilities including two ladders and a fish lock are provided. Powerhouse was constructed for 14 units which were installed initially and with substructure constructed for eight additional units, an ultimate total of 22 units. Initial installation, excluding two 13,500 kilowatt fishwater units, is 1,092,000 kilowatts. Powerhouse completed and eight units installed with capacity of 687,800 kilowatts. Total for 22 units is 1,779,800 kilowatts. Structures are founded on Columbia River basalt. Principal data concerning lock, spillway, and powerhouse are set forth in Table 37-0. (See Table 37-B for authorizing legislation.) 37-23 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 Local cooperation. None required except for non-Federal cost-sharing for development of Recreation Facilities at Completed Projects. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance continued. During fiscal year 8,863,704,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical power energy were generated at project of which 8,843,707,000 kilowatthours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Traffic through the navigation lock, consisting of petroleum products, grains and miscellaneous cargo amounted to 7,810,064 tons during calendar year 1980. Condition at end of fiscal year. Major construction of project initiated February 1952, was completed October 1960, when unit No. 14 was placed in commercial operation. Initial contract for additional units 15-22 was awarded in September 1967. Additional 8-unit phase was completed when unit 22 was placed in commercial operation in November 1973. Remaining work consists of improvement of fish facilities. Construction of future recreational facilities is contingent upon a cost-sharing contract with a non-Federal sponsor. Washington State Parks has indicated an interest in cost-sharing at a number of projects including The Dalles; however, a cost-sharing contract has not been consummated. Through September 1981 power generation totaled 159.9 billion kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville Power Administration, $190,753,050 was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. Studies for adding power generation facilities to the North Shore Fish Ladder Auxiliary Water Supply System were initiated in October 1979 and completed in December 1980. These facilities would provide baseload generation (3.5 megawatts) and would not impact the present operation of the North Fish Ladder. Contract on the Seufert Visitor Center was completed in September 1980. 60. OTHER AUTHORIZED MULTIPLE-PURPOSE PROJECTS, INCLUDING POWER See Table 37-P. General Investigations 61. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs were $1,595,088 of which $331,273 was for navigation studies, $994,072 for flood damage prevention studies, $122,593 for comprehensive studies, and $147,204 for coordination with other agencies. 62. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Inspectionof dams. The non-Federal dams being inspected under this program are hazard Category I dams (having a potential for loss of life and high property damage should a failure occur). This program is now completed with a total of 48 dams inspected; 13 of the dams inspected in FY 1981. Six of the dams were classified as unsafe but in a non-emergency status. Total FY 1981 inspection costs were $173,678. The program also includes verifying and updating the inventory of dams. Total FY 1981 costs for inventory of dams were $7,732. International water studies. The Columbia River Treaty between Canada and the United States of America relating to cooperative Development of the Water Resources of the Columbia River Basin was signed at Washington, D.C., on January 17, 1961, and the exchange of ratifications took place on September 16, 1964. Implementation of the Treaty by the United States and Canada entities under the guidance of the Permanent Engineering Board has continued. The two permanent committees established by the entities, the Operating Committee and the Hydrometeorological Committee, continue to function. The Entities and their coordinators and committees met on several occasions during the fiscal year. The Entities met with the Permanent Engineering Board on November 24, 1980. The Mica, Hugh Keenleyside (Arrow), Duncan, and Libby projects were operated in accordance with the "Detailed Operating Plan for Canadian Storage - August 1, 1980 through July 31, 1981". The Entities issued a "Report of the Columbia Treaty, Canadian and United States Entities, for the Period October 1, 1980 to September 30, 1981". The Entities Operating Committee prepared four reports which are issued each year: "Detailed Operating Plan for Columbia River Treaty Storage, August 1, 1981 through July 31, 1982"; Report on Operation of Columbia River Treaty Projects, August 1, 1980 through July 31, 1981"; "Columbia River Treaty Hydroelectric Operating Plan, Assured Operating Plan for Operation Year 1986-87", and "Determination of Downstream Power Benefits Resulting from Canadian Storage for Operating Year 1986-87". Costs for support of both committee activities were $19,000 for the fiscal year. Flood plain management services. Flood Plain Management Services Program comes under Section 206 of the 1960 Flood Control Act, PL 86-645, as amended. Through technical services and planning guidance, the program encourages comprehensive flood plain management planning at all levels to reduce the potential for losses to life and property from floods. Federal and non-Federal agencies and the private sector are assisted with planning and development information for flood hazard areas. This assistance is in the form of local flood plain regulations, Federal Insurance Program requirements, and Executive Order 11988 guidelines. Such assistance may include factual flood information (available or determined) and interpretation on flood frequencies, extent of flooding, flood-water velocity, duration of flooding and floodway limits. Services accomplished during fiscal year. Technical services and planning guidance responses furnished totaled 945. Of this total, 55 were from other Federal agencies; 290 from non-Federal agencies; and 600 from individuals, realtors, corporations, lending institutions, engineers, architects, and others. Cost for providing these services during FY 1981 totaled $251,759. Hydrologic studies. Environmental and ecological aspects are being considered on all hydrologic studies. Improvements in procedures to determine reservoir temperatures, nitrogen supersaturation, dissolved oxygen, suspended sediment, turbidity, design floods, flood forecasting and flood regulation are a continuing program. Costs for hydrologic studies during the fiscal year were $4,944. Total costs for collection and study of basic data for fiscal year 1981 were $457,113. 63. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT None. 37-24 PORTLAND, GREG., DISTRICT TABLE 37-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to In Text Project Funding FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 Sep. 30, 1981 1. Chetco River, Oreg. 2. Columbia and Lower Willamette Rivers Below Vancouver, Wash. and Portland, Oreg. (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 3. Columbia River at Baker Bay, Wash. 4. Columbia River Between Chinook, Wash., and Head of Sand Island 5. Columbia River at The Mouth, Oreg. and Wash. 6. Columbia River Between Vancouver, Wash. and The Dalles, Oreg. 7. Coos Bay, Oreg. (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost --- - 2,043,713 1 -- - - 2,043,713 256,000 210,000 218,000 438,000 2,389,174 269,174 210,607 220,562 414,518 2,364,946 2,659 13,403 5,319,600 5,113,715 - - - 28,349,304 2 - - - 28,349,304 2 4,346,800 49,893,300 10,0007,000163,820,026 3 4,604,694 25,420,498 28,326,565157,306,108 3 665,954 4 665,954 4 941,252 941,252 115,000 209,000 179,000 114,964 208,497 129,258 80,000 2,031,374 114,461 2,014,898 220,283 5 220,283 5 595,000 597,870 50,000 41,754 3,391,300 3,389,212 34,900 317,000 158,000 1,794,541 35,405 317,040 148,446 1,784,316 -20,000 11,524 3,394,058 3,443,183 18,000 17,000 3,008,000 2,976,030 250,000 17,457,761 6 198,546 17,405,307 6 5,326,000 56,182,159 4,768,601 55,573,005 - - -- 4,040,878 - - -- 4,040,878 - - -- 5,989,509 x - - - -5,989,509 8 372,500 366,000 342,500 622,000 9,591,548 246,816 560,736 352,115 615,974 9,580,166 10,708,586 485,000 -53,608 10,588,877 601,075 1,801 29,750,092 to 29,750,092 "' 3,653,000 3,476,000 3,355,000 2,737,200 41,340,748 " 3,660,300 3,473,667 3,304,736 2,701,903 41,246,148 " --- - 2,335,966 -- - - 2,335,966 130,900 130,900 79,680 79,680 486,680 486,680 37-25 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 37-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (continued) See Section Total Cost to In Text Project Funding FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 Sep. 30, 1981 8. Coos and Millicoma Rivers, Oreg. 9. Coquille River, Oreg. 10. Depoe Bay, Oreg. 11. Lake River, Wash. 12. Lewis River, Wash. 13. Multnomah Channel, Oreg. 14. Nehalem Bay, Oreg. 15. Port Orford, Oreg. 16. Rogue River Harbor at Gold Beach, Oreg. New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost - 350,238 12 - 350,238 12 127,000 80,351 35,623 40,742 295,500 296,053 4,000 4,058 -1,000 1,505 136,000 119,431 22,000 22,283 29,000 31,170 73,000 124,483 33,000 24,142 308,000 309,022 4,000 3,314 171,800 67,000 1,097,999 125,524 109,343 1,093,956 - - 693,366 13 - - 693,366 13 53,000 292,000 3,542,944 14 52,855 230,454 3,480,405 14 - - 367,364 - - 367,364 26,000 165,000 586,764 26,471 140,925 561,863 - - 2,700 - - 2,700 - 23,000 - 22,916 15,500 32,658 11,667 14,120 1,500 2,804 30,000 26,572 - 71,036 419 71,036 - 58,132 15 - 58,132 15 3,500 687,447 16 2,468 685,934 16 270,000 404,522 234,328 365,422 - 302,006 17 - 302,006 17 - 44,760 - 44,760 - 160,000 2,232,000 2,392,000 - 156,584 2,201,795 2,358,379 - - - 758,692 '8 - - - 758,692 18 76,100 70,000 60,500 1,072,728 77,382 70,649 56,486 1,068,409 - - - 4,156,252 19 - - - 4,156,252 19 431,000 425,000 685,700 399,000 4,787,520 2o 401,559 382,785 599,711 552,841 4,780,211 20 37-26 PORTLAND OREG., DISTRICT TABLE 37-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (continued) See Section Total Cost to In Text Project Funding FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 Sep. 30, 1981 17. Siuslaw River, Oreg. 18. Skamokawa Creek, Wash. 19. Skipanon Channel, Oreg. 20. Tillamook Bay and Bar, Oreg. 21. Umpqua River, Oreg. 22. Willamette River Above Portland and Yamhill River, Oreg. 23. Yaquina Bay and Harbor, Oreg. Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 584,500 654,000 385,000 582,035 651,792 384,838 19,200 23,337 32,200 18,491 4,819,222 4,816,836 195,000 195,964 22,000 20,686 104,500 116,997 3,641,000 3,629,119 48,500 48,122 - 5,000,000 - 4,986,139 1,317,000 745,000 1,749,341 743,274 234,000 235,846 2,251,500 2,482,609 35,000 35,799 66,000 67,244 -5,399 8,868 66,500 69,269 10,150,000 10,157,855 964,500 956,832 59,000 83,000 28,416 107,520 461,000 458,823 287,000 291,721 - 635,783 - 635,783 210,000 1,369,357 21 196,104 1,355,461 21 943,000 6,949,643 " 909,802 6,911,264 " - 879,285 - 879,285 - 2,400 - 2,400 15,000 304,799 3,713 292,858 - 280,854 - 280,854 487,000 1,415,407 304,010 1,232,112 - 22,434,827 23 - 22,434,827 23 230,000 2,483,483 2 229,073 2,482,285 a - 2,839,799 - 2,839,799 15,000 17,868,877 m -170,736 17,677,135 26 650,000 17,406,305 602,890 17,347,621 - 2,500,677 - 2,500,677 - 862,918 2 - 862,918 2 47,000 17,628,056 27 54,802 17,625,257 2 - 19,242,046 2 - 19.242.046 2 420,000 13,736,507 * 408.591 13.724.676 2 37-27 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 37-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (continued) See Section Total Cost to In Text Project Funding FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 Sep. 30, 1981 24. Yaquina River, Oreg. 29. Willamette River at Willamette Falls, Oreg. 30. Beaver Drainage District, Oreg. 31. Johnson Creek, Oreg. 33. Lower Columbia River Basin Bank Protection Works, Oreg. and Wash. 34. Scappoose Drainage District, Oreg. 35. Vancouver Lake Area, Wash. 36. Wahkiakum County Consolidated Diking District No. 1, Wash. 37. Willamette River Basin, Oreg. (Bank Protection) 42. Applegate Lake, Rogue River Basin Oreg. 43. Blue River Lake, Oreg. Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Minor Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 114,400 28,879 7,000 6,043 343,000 330,000 1 343,077 312,095 1 711,305 557,000 468,568 60,000 482,344 390,000 337,448 1,950,000 1,292,692 714,000 639,035 81,000 79,103 14,012,000 14,449,748 114,500 118,624 27 ,193 1,329,000 1,416,725 40,000 93,501 7,000 61,370 107,725 1,429,213 1,558,275 1,626,146 225,000 218,823 27,450,000 27,444,201 88,000 87,642 1 33 33 - - 12,005 - - 12,005 - - 28,800 - - 28,800 21,000 23,500 592,745 30 107,720 19,547 588,734 30 - - 520,005 31 - - 520,005 31 ,150,200 526,000 11,088,823 32 ,172,411 515,060 11,075,238 - - 234,794 -- - 234,794 50,000 - 3,139,944 3 584 45,632 3,121,631 17,000 35,000 128,454 9,680 36,396 122,530 ,035,000 810,000 11,874,745 979,961 721,022 11,713,035 1,659 50,000 3,992,558 3 23,471 8,759 3,930,454 3 - - 839,391 - 40 889,391 250,000 - 4,990,833 194,681 36,201 4,962,364 172,550 1,935,000 20,397,316 3 179,958 1,931,497 20,393,131 35 75,000 93,000 3,000,944 84,498 87,657 2,995,499 1,130,000 5,784,480 87,681,089 ,078,782 5,866,394 87,644,289 - 80,500 80,500 - 75,849 75,849 - - 32,038,225 3 - - 32,038,225 3 82,300 107,000 1,005,691 82,210 100,028 998,068 37-28 PORTLAND OREG., DISTRICT TABLE 37-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (continued) See Section Total Cost to In Text Project Funding FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 Sep. 30, 1981 44. Cottage Grove Lake, Oreg. 45. Days Creek Lake, Oreg. 46. Dorena Lake, Oreg. 47. Elk Creek Lake, Rogue River Basin, Oreg. 48. Fall Creek Lake, Oreg. 49. Fern Ridge Lake, Oreg. 51. Bonneville Lock and Dam - Lake Bonneville, Oreg. and Wash. 52. Cougar Lake, Oreg. 53. Detroit Lake, Oreg. 54. Green Peter-Foster Lakes, Oreg. New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Minor Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 366,000 9,000 368,871 27,130 622,600 431,900 512,695 557,563 45,000 60,000 50,252 69,833 - 9,500 - 9,500 143,000 160,000 150,118 159,378 - 51,000 30,192 162,643 494,300 30,000 556,490 94,332 193,000 307,000 159,875 315,162 71,000 -56,984 311,225 -50,339 336,000 385,000 344,778 390,985 25,000 24,904 416,000 407,342 -417 17,000 16,150 202,000 202,962 24,450 87,739 14 4,084 491,000 478,862 4,786 3,140 669,000 479,303 75,824,000 131,400,000 148,336,000 75,663,308 131,713,437 148,464,079 3,973,600 5,146,900 5,103,000 4,571,289 4,873,077 5,293,379 566,027 900,000 -59,251 737,984 877,210 106,449 357,000 474,000 526,000 353,222 484,863 424,205 842,500 925,000 942,500 790,535 960,857 971,951 255,000 4,004,097 7 254,267 4,004,249 7 509,000 4,905,500 38 507,201 4,890,040 38 - 1,098,780 39 455 1,098,734 39 33,000 14,117,062 40 32,323 14,115,535 40 251,000 2,776,474 247,184 2,772,041 8,550 9,018,079 23,072 8,987,367 - 22,118,265 41 916 22,118,249 41 261,000 2,737,365 297,580 2,726,584 10,000 8,337,960 42 12,817 8,337,918 42 519,000 6,222,933 43 705,536 6,219,035 43 84,232,000 661,867,604 44 84,275,102 661,771,364 44 5,560,000 84,651,807 45 5,207,930 84,128,78045 - 58,621,405 46 12,353 58,621,307 46 508,000 5,561,116 591,598 5,541,302 - 62,729,698 - 62,729,698 1,190,000 16,766,167 1,183,361 16,746,661 - 363,086 - 363,086 - 84,005,788 47 - 84,005,788 47 -27 37-29 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 37-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (continued) See Section Total Cost to In Text Project Funding FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 Sep. 30, 1981 Maint. Approp. 986,000 1,317,000 1,185,000 1,547,500 12,127,184 Cost 958,296 1,353,089 1,187,043 1,501,227 12,066,011 55. Hills Creek Lake, New Work Oreg. Approp. - - - - 45,700,619 Cost - - - - 45,700,619 Maint. Approp. 222,500 255,000 354,500 360,000 4,320,767 Cost 223,103 254,011 355,031 320,090 4,278,540 56. John Day Lock and Dam - New Work Lake Umatilla, Oreg. Approp. 579,000 350,984 441,000 1,009,000 480,703,246 8 and Wash. Cost 713,218 406,356 272,902 1,252,292 480,688,381 4 Maint. Approp. 4,691,050 5,019,700 7,740,000 6,199,500 47,030,605 49 Cost 4,857,911 4,904,842 5,664,016 7,573,634 46,105,754 9 Major Rehab. Approp. - - 2,255,000 4,300,000 6,555,000 Cost - - 2,207,522 4,339,347 6,546,869 57. Lookout Point New Work Lake, Oreg. Approp. -5,000 - - 10,000 88,238,395 50 Cost 686 - - 9,968 88,238,363 50 Maint. Approp. 1,598,000 1,673,000 1,798,000 1,746,000 23,249,550 Cost 2,837,781 1,839,412 1,769,206 1,695,300 23,152,702 58. Lost Creek Lake, New Work Rogue River Approp. 4,780,600 3,525,000 655,000 -8,550135,863,450 Basin, Oreg. Cost 4,969,952 3,092,415 980,866 -218,984135,254,745 Maint. Approp. 1,110,000 1,200,000 1,443,500 1,908,000 6,026,500 Cost 1,084,392 1,229,140 1,409,880 1,722,303 5,802,394 59. The Dalles Lock and New Work Dam - Lake Celilo, Approp. 118,747 26,000 1,976,000 -85,480 301,064,288 51 Wash. and Oreg. Cost 182,889 130,239 1,636,272 254,888 301,063,988 51 Maint. Approp. 3,199,800 3,894,000 4,484,000 5,317,000 51,069,848 52 Cost 3,214,716 3,872,539 4,374,992 4,877,000 50,391,697 52 1. Excludes $17,742 contributed funds for new work. 11. Includes $178,801 for previous project and $1,444,640 under Code 700, 2. Includes $1,529,413 for previous project. Deferred Maintenance. Excludes $8,387 contributed funds. 3. Includes $150,955 allotted from deferred maintenance funds, Code 700, 12. Excludes $80,000(other funds)contributed for new work by Portof Coos Bay $62,296 for public works accelerated program repair, and $1,214,865 for to cover additional cost of disposing of dredge spoils in Coos Bay, Oreg.; includes previous project. Excludes $24,320 expended from contributed funds prior to $8,000 for previous project. $14,792 by Port of Vancouver. 15. Includes $22,252 for previous project. 5. Includes $84.930 rehabilitation funds. 16. Includes $8,098 for previous project. 6. Includes $1,986,253 for previous project and $508,111 allotted and $455,657 17. Excludes $304,826 contributed funds. expended under Code 710, recreation facilities at completed project. Excludes 18. Excludes $9.900 contributed funds. $500,000 contributed funds. 19. Excludes $13,779 (other funds) contributed for additional landfill and extension of drainage lines. 7. Includes $2,186,000 for previous project and $1,188,625 under deferred 20. Includes $20,750, Wedderburn Study Funds. maintenance, Code 700. 21. Includes $151,701 for previous project. Excludes $322,532 expended from 8. Includes funds underCode721(small authorized projects) $30,393 Entrance contributed funds. to Oregon Slough; $161,897 Camas-Washougal Turning Basin; $227,908 Hood 22. Includes$10,611forpreviousprojectand $188,000underCode700, Deferred River Small Boat Basin; $157,470 Bingen, Wash., Barge Channel; and $140,619 Maintenance. The Dalles Small Boat Basin. 23. Includes $77,209 for previous project and $57,767 under Code 720 (Small 9. Includes $2,033,408 under Code 700 (Deferred Maintenance). Authorized Projects) Garibaldi Boat Basin. Excludes $592,622 contributed 10. Includes $802,096 for previous project. Excludes contributed funds. funds and $300,000 channel dredging by local interest. 37-30 PORTLAND, OREG., DISTRICT 24. Includes $71,498 for previous project. Excludes $6,450 expended from contributed funds. 25. Includes $39,242 for previous project and $58,824 under Code 720 (Small Authorized Projects) Winchester Bay and Schofield River, Oreg. Excludes $276,500 contributed funds. 26. Includes $247,748 for previous project. Excludes $484,900 Emergency Relief Administration flood control funds for bank protection. 27. Includes $51,500 deferred maintenance funds Code 700, and $35,935 for Public Works Acceleration program repair. In addition $7,500 for maintenance from contributed funds and $246,637 on operating and care of improvements under provisions of permanent indefinite appropriation. 28. Includes $707,313 for previous project and $170,000 appropriated from public works acceleration program for north jetty rehabilitation. 29. Includes $6,026 for previous project. 30. Excludes $3,000 contributed funds. 31. Excludes $300,000 contributed funds. 32. Includes $452,110 on operation and care from permanent indefinite appropriation and $150,000 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. 33. Includes $274,578 for previous project. 34. Includes $424,310 for previous project. 35. Excludes $93,733 contributed funds. 36. Includes $96,000 pro rata share of site selection costs in lieu of Quartz Creek Lake. 37. Includes 1,630,803 allotted and $1,629,954 expended under Code 711, recreation facilities at completed project. 38. Includes $114,700 special recreation use fees. 39. Excludes $208,440 allotted and $208,440 expended for Phase I G.I. funds. 40. Includes $587,590 allotted and $586,063 expended under Code 711. recreation facilities at completed project. 41. Includes $259,650, Code 711, recreation facilities at completed project. Includes ,766,614 allotted and $766,600 expended under Code 713. 42. Includes $275,054 allotted; $275,012 expended Code 711, $2,421,978 Code 712, and $1,008,666 under Code 713, recreation facilities at completed projects and $136,482allotted under 721 (small authorized project) reservoir modification. Excludes $2,100 (other funds contributed). 43. Includes $9,750 allotted under Code 700, deferred maintenance. 44. Includes $12,200,000 Public Works Administration funds, $20,240,700 National Recovery Act funds, $27,195,400 modification for peaking funds, $436,457 Code 711, recreation facilities at completed project funds and $550,996,352 allotted and $550,900,112 expended second powerhouse funds. 45. Includes $540,000 deferred maintenance funds, Code 700 and $1,389,525 maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. 46. Includes $96,000 pro rata share of site selection in lieu of Quartz Creek Lake. Includes $1,775,000 allotment, $1,774,901 expended, for Strube Lake and Cougar Additional Unit. 47. Includes $113,000 pro rata share of site selection costs in lieu of Sweet Home Lake. 48. Includes $5,984 under Code 713, recreation facilities at completed projects. 49. Includes $1,516,850 for O&M and fish evaluation of Spring Creek Hatchery (funds revoked and paid to USFWS at OCE level, but a cost to project); includes $394,600 special recreation use fees. Includes $630,815 allotted under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. 50. Includes $457,611 allotted and $457,579 expended under Code 713, recreation facilities at completed project. 51. Inclides $985,318Code 712, $138,682Code 711, $16,747 Code 713, recreation facilities at completed project, and $52,997,220 allotted and $52.996.919 expended additional units 15-22 funds. 52. Includes $455,619 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. TABLE 37-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents CHETCO RIVER, OREG. (See Section 1 of Text) March 2, 1945 To provide for the stabilization of the channel, by H. Doc. 817, 77th Cong., constructing jetties and dredging. 2nd Sess. Oct. 27, 1965 Modification of channel entrance and channel improvements. S. Doc. 21, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. COLUMBIA AND LOWER WILLAMETTE RIVERS BELOW VANCOUVER, WASH., AND PORTLAND, OREG. (See Section 2 of Text) Feb. 27, 1911 2 pipeline dredges and accessories. H. Doc. 1278, 61st Cong., 3rd Sess.1 July 25, 1912 Increasing main channel to 30 feet. H. Doc. 1278, 61st Cong., 3rd Sess.' July 27, 1916 Consolidating improvement below Portland, Oreg., and No Prior Report. between Vancouver, Wash., and mouth of Willamette. Aug. 8, 1917 For the Cathlamet channel. H. Doc. 120, 63rd Cong., 1st Sess.' Sept. 22, 1922 Construct an additional dredge (dredge was not built) and H. Doc. 1009, 66th Cong., accessories for better maintenance, and construct 3rd Sess. contraction works. Mar. 4, 19232 Channel from deep water in Willamette Slough to deep water H. Doc. 156, 67th Cong., in Columbia River. 2nd Sess. Mar. 3, 1925 Depth of 25 feet and width of 300 feet from mouth of H. Doc. 126, 68th Cong., Willamette River to Vancouver, Wash. 1st Sess. 37-31 TABLE 37-A (continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 37-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (continued) Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 3, 1927 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 10, 69th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 195, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 8, 71st Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 249, 72nd Cong., 2nd Sess.' July 3, 1930 Sept. 6, 19333 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 July 24, 1946 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 Closing east channel at Swan Island in Willamette River on condition that main channel to be opened to project dimensions on west side of island by Port of Portland. For a 35-foot channel 500 feet wide from Portland to the sea. A channel 28 feet deep and 300 feet wide from mouth of Willamette River to Vancouver, with 2 turning basins, each generally 28 feet deep by 800 feet wide by 2,000 feet long. A channel in Columbia River from mouth of Willamette to interstate highway bridge at Vancouver, Wash., 30 feet deep and 300 feet wide, with 2 turning basins at Vancouver. Maintenance of not to exceed 35-foot depth at low water in Portland Harbor and Willamette River between its mouth and Broadway Bridge at Portland. Auxiliary channels, 30 feet deep, 300 feet and 500 feet at St. Helens. Extension of lower turning basin at Vancouver, Wash., 1,000 feet downstream. An auxiliary channel 24 feet deep and 200 feet wide along waterfront at Rainier, Oreg. Improvement of old mouth of Cowlitz River. An auxiliary channel in vicinity of Longview, Wash. A small-boat mooring basin at Astoria, Oreg. A channel 35 feet deep and 500 feet wide from mouth of Willamette River to interstate highway bridge at Vancouver, Wash., with 2 turning basins of same depth. A channel 40 feet deep and 600 feet wide from Vancouver, Wash. to mouth of Columbia River; a turning basin at Vancouver, Wash., a turning basin at Longview, Wash., and a channel 40 feet deep in Willamette River from mouth to Broadway Bridge which encompasses Portland Harbor area. COLUMBIA RIVER AT BAKER BAY, WASH., (See Section 3 of Text) Main channel Main channel West channel 8 feet deep West channel 10 feet deep and mooring basin with protecting breakwaters. COLUMBIA RIVER BETWEEN CHINOOK, WASH., AND HEAD OF SAND ISLAND (See Section 4 of Text) Channel 8 feet deep. 37-32 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 1, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 6, 73rd Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 235, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess. 1 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 81, 74th Cong., 2nd Sess.' H. Doc. 203, 75th Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 341, 77th Cong., 1st Sess.1 H. Doc. 630, 77th Cong., 2nd Sess.' H. Doc. 692, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess.' H. Doc. 203, 87th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 452, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess.' Public Works Administration H. Doc. 44, 73rd Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 443, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 95, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Dec. 11, 1933 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 17, 1950 June 20, 1938 PORTLAND, OREG., DISTRICT TABLE 37-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (continued) Acts Work Authorized Documents Sept. 3, 1954 Mar. 3, 1905 Sept. 3, 1954 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 July 24, 1946 July 24, 1946 July 24, 1946 July 24, 1946 June 25, 1910 Mar. 2, 1919 Sept. 22, 1922 Jan. 21, 1927 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 July 24, 1946 June 30, 1948 Dec. 31, 1970 Channel 10 feet deep and mooring basin. COLUMBIA RIVER AT THE MOUTH, OREG. AND WASH. (See Section 5 of Text) Extend South Jetty and construct North Jetty and dredging. Bar channel of 48-foot depth and spur jetty on north shore. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. COLUMBIA RIVER, BETWEEN VANCOUVER, WASH., AND THE DALLES, OREG. (See Section 6 of Text) Construct a channel 27 feet deep by 300 feet from Vancouver, Wash., to Bonneville, Oreg. Construct Camas-Washougal turning basin. Construct a channel 27 feet deep by 300 feet wide from Bonneville, Oreg., to The Dalles, Oreg. Construct a boat basin at Hood River, Oreg., 10 feet deep, 500 feet wide, by 1,300 feet long. Construct a barge channel at Bingen, Wash., 10 feet deep, 200 feet wide, by 1 mile long, and an access channel 7 feet deep, 100 feet wide, by 1,000 feet long to natural mooring basin. Construct The Dalles Harbor 8 feet deep, 400 feet wide by 800 feet long. COOS BAY, OREG. (See Section 7 of Text) Dredging the Ocean Bar Channel A channel 22 feet deep to Smith's Mill Restore North Jetty 9,600 feet long, construct a South Jetty about 3,900 feet long, extend 22-foot bay channel from Smith's Mill to Millington. Extend jetties to such lengths as may be practicable within estimate of total cost of jetties, $3,250,000 as given in H. Doc. 150, 67th Cong. A channel 24 feet deep and 300 feet wide, through Pigeon Point Reef, following a location along westerly side of bay. For 24-foot channel from Pigeon Point Reef to Smith's Mill and a turning basin above Marshfield. Increased dimensions of channel across bar and to Isthmus Slough and turning basin opposite Coalbank Slough and at city of North Bend; anchorage basins at mile 3.5 and near mile 7. A mooring basin and connecting channel at Charleston. Increase dimensions to provide for bar channel 45 feet deep, inner channel 35 feet deep to mile 15, and 37-33 Committee Doc. 50, 75th Cong., 2nd Sess. S. Doc. 8, 83rd Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 94, 56th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 249, 83rd Cong., 2nd Sess.' Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Committee Doc. 94, '7 4th Cong., 2nd Sess.' H. Doc. 218, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 704, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 704, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 704, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. S. Doc. 89, 79th Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 958, 60th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 325, 65th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 150, 67th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 110, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Committee Print, 73rd Cong., 2nd Sess.' S. Doc. 253, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doec. 64(i, 80th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 151, 91st Cong., 2nd Sess. REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 37-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (continued) Acts Work Authorized Documents deepening and widening existing turning basins and anchorage area. June 3, 1896 June 30, 1948 June 25, 1910 Mar. 2, 1919 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 July 3, 1930 Mar. 3, 1897 Mar. 4. 1913 COOS AND MILLICOMA RIVERS, OREG. (See Section 8 of Text) Dredging channel from mouth to head of navigation. For a 5 ft. depth from mouth to head of navigation on the Millicoma River and South Fork. Except on South Fork above M. 14 where 3 ft. will suffice. COQUILLE RIVER, OREG. (See Section 9 of Text) Dredging shoals between mouth and Riverton, and removing obstruction between mouth of North Fork and Bandon. For a 13-foot channel from ocean to Bandon. Deepen channel to 16 feet between sea and eastern end of North Jetty. Present project depth between sea and eastern end of North Jetty. For 13-foot depth from sea to a point 1 mile above Coquille River Lighthouse and snagging to State Highway Bridge. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. DEPOE BAY, OREG. (See Section 10 of Text) Construction of inner basin 375 feet long, 125 feet wide and 5 feet deep, with entrance channel of same depth and 50 feet wide. Construction of inner basin 750 feet long, 390 feet wide and 8 feet deep, with entrance channel at same depth and 30 feet wide. LAKE RIVER, WASH. (See Section 11 of Text) Construction of channel 6 feet deep and 110 feet wide from mouth to Ridgefield. LEWIS RIVER, WASH. (See Section 12 of Text) Provide a channel to head of navigation. Increase the control depth and widen channel. MULTNOMAH CHANNEL, OREG. (See Section 13 of Text) Extension of channel 10 feet deep, 300 feet wide, and 2,950 feet long. Provides channel in Scappoose Bay 10 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and 7,080 feet long. NEHALEM BAY, OREG. (See Section 14 of Text) Two rubber-stone jetties. PORT ORFORD, OREG. (See Section 15 of Text) 37-34 H. Doc. 237, 53rd Cong., 3rd Sess. S. Doc. 124, 80th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 673, 61st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 207, 65th Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 186, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. 1 S. Committee Print, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. H. Doc. 672, 76th Cong., 2nd Sess.' Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 202, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 350, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. R & H Act, H. Doc. 2, 69th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 64, 55th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 28, 62nd Cong., 1st Sess. Section 107, PL 86-645, Authorized Chief of Engineers December 4, 1979. H. Doc. 623, 62nd Cong., 2nd Sess. July 14, 1960 July 25, 1912 PORTLAND OREG., DISTRICT TABLE 37-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (continued) Acts Work Authorized Documents Oct. 27, 1965 Dec. 31, 1970 Sept. 3, 1954 June 25, 1910 Mar. 3, 1925 July 3, 1958 Oct. 22, 1976 Oct. 1, 1980 March 2, 1919 July 3, 1930 Aug. 26, 1937 June 30, 1948 July 26, 1912 Mar. 4, 1913 Mar. 2, 1919 Mar. 3, 1925 Mar. 2, 1945 June 30, 1948 Sept. 3, 1954 Oct. 27, 1965 Sept. 22, 1922 Extension of existing breakwater by 550 feet. Dredging of turning basin 340 feet long, 100 feet feet wide, 16 feet deep. ROGUE RIVER, HARBOR AT GOLD BEACH, OREG. (See Section 16 of Text) Two jetties at entrance and improvement of channel. SIUSLAW RIVER, OREG. (See Section 17 of Text) Extends North Jetty 3,700 feet from old work constructed under previous project and provides for 4,200 foot South Jetty. 12-foot deep channel. 18-foot bar channel and 16-foot river channel and a 600-foot extension of North Jetty. (600-foot extension classified deferred). Phase I advance engineering and design for north and south jetty extensions. Extending north and south jetties about 2,000 and 2,500 feet, respectively. SKAMOKAWA CREEK, WASH. (See Section 18 of Text) Channel 6.5 feet deep and 75 feet wide, a low water between between Steamboat and Brooks Slough. SKIPANON CHANNEL, OREG. (See Section 19 of Text) Channel from deep water in Columbia River to railroad bridge. Channel extending upstream from railroad bridge a distance of 4,500 feet. Mooring basin 12 feet deep at Warrenton. TILLAMOOK BAY AND BAR, OREG. (See Section 20 of Text) Construct North Jetty 5,700 feet long and dredging channel 16 feet deep, 200 feet wide, to Bay City. Abandon that portion of project above Bay City. Abandon Bay City Channel and present project dimension of channels and turning basins with regulating works as needed. Repair damage and check erosion on Bayocean Peninsula caused by storm Jan. 1939. Dredging small-boat basin and approach at Garibaldi, Oreg., to depth of 12 feet. Closure of breach in Bayocean Peninsula. Construct South Jetty, 8,000 feet long. UMPQUA RIVER, OREG. (See Section 21 of Text) North Jetty, 7,500 feet long. S. Doc. 62, 88th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 151, 91st Cong., 2nd Sess. S. Doc. 83, 83rd Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 648, 61st Cong., 2nd Sess. S. Committee Print, Serial, 68th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 204, 85th Cong., 91st Sess.' Final Report of Chief of Engineers P.L. 96-367, Energy & Water Development Act of 1981 H. Doc. 3, 63rd Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 278, 70th Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 201, 75th Cong., 1st Sess.1 S. Doc. 95, 81st Cong., 1st Sess.1 H. Doc. 349, 62nd Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 760, 65th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 562, 68th Cong., 2nd Sess. 4 S. Doc. 35, 79th Cong., 1st Sess. S H. Doc. 650, 80th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 128, 83rd Cong., 2nd Sess.' S. Doc. 43, 89th Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 913, 65th Cong., 2nd Sess. 37-35 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 37-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (continued) Acts Work Authorized Documents Jan. 21, 1927 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 June 20, 1938 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 June 30, 1948 Sept. 3, 1954 June 3, 1896 June 3, 1896 July 25, 1912 July 3, 1930 June 26, 19346 June 28, 19387 Mar. 2, 1919 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Present project dimensions of North Jetty and dredging ocean bar. A short south jetty. A full length south jetty and maintenance dredging to a 26-foot depth. Channel 22 feet deep and 200 feet wide from mouth to Reedsport. Channel 22 feet deep and 200 feet wide from river channel to Gardiner and turning basin 22 feet deep, 500 feet wide and 800 feet long. Channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide from river channel to dock in Winchester Bay with mooring and turning basin 10 feet deep, 175 feet wide, and 300 feet long at inner end. Channel 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide from river channel to dock in Winchester Bay with mooring and turning basin 12 feet deep, 175 feet wide, and 300 feet long at inner end.' Channel 12 feet deep, Scholfield River. WILLAMETTE RIVER ABOVE PORTLAND AND YAMHILL RIVER, OREG.8 (See Section 22 of Text) Improvement of Willamette River above Oregon City. Improvement of Yamhill River by lock and dam construction. Project modified in 1904 by abandoning 20-mile stretch of river between Harrisburg and Eugene as unworthy of improvement. A 6-foot channel in Willamette River below Oregon City. For 8-foot channel between Portland and Oregon City. Operating and care of lock and dam at Yamhill River and provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors. Streamflow regulation with controlling depths of 6 feet to mouth of Santiam River and 5 feet to Albany with enlargement of locks at Oregon City. Operation of Yamhill Lock was discontinued February 7, 1954, and the lock and adjacent property turned over to Yamhill County January 16, 1959. YAQUINA BAY AND HARBOR, OREG. (See Section 23 of Text) Restoration and extension of jetties constructed under previous projects, rock removal at entrance, and dredging in bay up to railroad terminus at Yaquina. Extension of north jetty seaward 1,000 feet. 26-foot channel of suitable width across entrance bar, so far as rock bottom will allow, a 20-foot channel H. Doc. 320, 69th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 317, 70th Cong., tst Sess.' Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 9, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess.' S. Doc. 158, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess.' S. Doc. 86, 76th Cong., 1st Sess.' S. Doc. 191, 77th Cong., 2nd Sess.' S. Doc. 154, 80th Cong., 2nd Sess.' S. Doc. 133, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess.' H. Doc. 260, 54th Cong., 1st Sess. (Annual Report, 1896, p. 3300) Annual Report, 1895, p. 3602 Annual Report, 1904, p. 3529 H. Doc. 438, 62nd Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 372, 71st Cong., 2nd Sess.' H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 109, 65th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Committee Print, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 119, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. 1 37-36 PORTLAND, OREG., DISTRICT TABLE 37-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (continued) Acts Work Authorized Documents July 24, 1946 July 3, 1958 July 14, 1960 Mar. 4, 1977 Mar. 4, 1913 June 25, 1910 Aug. 8, 1917 June 26, 19347 Mar. 2, 1945 June 22, 1936 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 Mar. 20, 1950 Mar. 20, 1950 300 feet wide along south side of bay to and including a turning basin 22 feet deep, 1,000 feet wide and 1,200 feet long. Construct a small-boat mooring basin at Newport, Oreg. 40-foot bar channel and 30-foot river channel extension of jetties at entrance. A small boat basin, north side A small boat basin, south shore YAQUINA RIVER, OREG. (See Section 24 of Text) Construction of channel 10 feet deep and generally 150 feet wide on Yaquina River and 200 feet wide in Depoe Creek. WILLAMETTE RIVER AT WILLAMETTE FALLS, OREG. (See Section 29 of Text) For purchase and rehabilitation of system and construction of concrete division wall. Deepening of locks. Operation and care of canal and locks provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for Rivers and Harbors. Construction of New Willamette Falls Lock. BEAVER DRAINAGE DISTRICT, COLUMBIA COUNTY, OREG. (See Section 30 of Text) Improvements to existing levee and additional levee and revetment construction. DAYS CREEK LAKE, OREG. (See Section 45 of Text) Authorizes upgrading of existing improvements. JOHNSON CREEK, PORTLAND AND VICINITY, OREG. (See Section 31 of Text) Clearing and channel rectification. LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN, OREG. AND WASH. (See Section 32 of Text) Bank protection work, improvements to existing projects, and construction of flood control works in Lower Columbia River Basin. LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER BANK PROTECTION, OREG. AND WASH. (See Section 33 of Text) Provides bank protection on Columbia River below river mile 125 and along principal tributaries. S. Doc. 246, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. S. Doc. 8, 85th Cong., 1st Sess. I Sec. 107 Approved, Chief of Engineers Sec. 107, Approved, Chief of Engineers R&H Act, H. Doc. 579, 62nd Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 202, 56th Cong., 1st Sess. and Annual Report, 1900, p. 4374 H. Doc. 1060, 62nd Cong., 3rd Sess.' H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. F.C. Act 1936 H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. 37-37 REPORT OF TIE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 37-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (continued) Acts Work Authorized Documents June 22, 1936 Mar. 20, 1950 Mar. 20, 1950 Mar. 20, 1950 Mar. 16, 1938 Mar. 20, 1950 June 22, 1936 Mar. 16, 1938 Mar. 20, 1950 Oct. 23, 1962 Mar. 7, 1974 Mar. 17, 1950 Mar. 16, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended Mar. 7, 1974 Oct. 22, 1977 Mar. 16, 1938 SCAPPOOSE DRAINAGE DISTRICT, OREG. (See Section 34 of Text) Construction of levee system. Raising and strengthening of levee. VANCOUVER LAKE AREA, WASH. (See Section 35 of Text) Raising and strengthening existing levee. WAHKIAKUM COUNTY CONSOLIDATED DIKING DISTRICT NO. 1, WASH. (See Section 36 of Text) Raising and strengthening all levees encircling islands. Construct drainage canal, tide box and pumping plant. WILLAMETTE RIVER BASIN, OREG. (See Section 37 of Text) Comprehensive plan for flood control, navigation and other purposes in Willamette River Basin. General improvements. WILLAMETTE RIVER BASIN, OREG., BANK PROTECTION (See Section 38 of Text) Bank protection works, with channel clearing. Provide additional protection against flooding. Addition of 77 locations to scope of project. APPLEGATE LAKE, ROGUE RIVER BASIN, OREG. (See Section 42 of Text) Authorizes a rockfill embankment dam. Authorizes construction of project but no operation for irrigation until local interests agree to repay cost allocated. BLUE RIVER LAKE, OREG. (See Section 43 of Text) Authorizes gravel-filled embankment dam. COTTAGE GROVE LAKE, OREG. (See Section 44 of Text) Earthfill dam. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. DAYS CREEK LAKE, OREG. (See Section 45 of Text) Earthfill dam. (Phase I.) Authorized $250,000 to complete Phase I. DORENA LAKE, OREG. (See Section 46 of Text) Earthfill dam. 37-38 F.C. Act 1936 H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. F.C. Act 1936 H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 566, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. P.L. 93-251 WRDA of 1974 H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 544, 7th Cong., 3rd Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 371, 92nd Cong., 2nd Sess. P.L. 94-587, Water Resources Development Act H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. PORTLAND, OREG., DISTRICT TABLE 37-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (continued) Acts Work Authorized Documents Dec. 22, 1944 as amended Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 7, 1970 Mar. 20, 1950 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended Mar. 16, 1938 Oct. 23, 1962 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 566, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. P.L. 91-439, Public Works Approp. Act., 1971 H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 403, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. ELK CREEK LAKE, ROGUE RIVER BASIN, OREG., (See Section 47 of Text) Rock and gravel embankment dam. Authorizes construction but not operation for irrigation until local interests agree to repay cost allocated. FALL CREEK LAKE, OREG. (See Section 48 of Text) Earth and gravel fill embankment dam. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. FERN RIDGE LAKE, OREG. (See Section 49 of Text) Earthfill embankment dam. Raise height of dam to obtain additional storage. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. BONNEVILLE LOCK AND DAM -BONNEVILLE LAKE, OREG. AND WASH. (See Section 51 of Text) Existing project was originally authorized Sept. 30, 1933, by Federal Emergency Administration of Public Works. Existing project authorized by Congress. Completion, maintenance, and operation of Bonneville Project under direction of Secretary of War and supervision of Chief of Engineers, subject to certain provisions therein relating to powers and duties of Bonneville Power Administrator. Authorizes relocation of town of North Bonneville to new town site. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. COUGAR LAKE, OREG. (See Section 52 of Text) Rockfill dam. Addition of Power. Strube Lake reregulating dam. DETROIT LAKE, OREG. (See Section 53 of Text) Authorizes concrete gravity structure. 37-39 S. Committee Print, 73rd Cong., 2nd Sess., (Report of Chief of Engineers Date Aug. 21, 1933) P.L. 93-251, Water Resources Development Act Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. P.L. 83-780 F.C. Act 1954 P.L. 87-874 F.C. Act 1962 H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 20, 1937 Mar. 7, 1974 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended Mar. 20, 1950 Sept. 3, 1954 Oct. 23, 1962 Mar. 16, 1938 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 37-B (continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 37-40 1. Contains latest published maps. Hobsonville, and regulating works as needed. 2. Public Resolution 10)5. 67th Cong. 5. Inactive. 3. Public Works Administration. 6. Flood Control Act. 4. Includes following work. classified inactive. A channel to Hobsonville 200 7. Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. feet wide and 16 feet deel), with a turning basin 500 feet wide at 8. Classified deferred. Acts June 30, 1948 Mar. 20, 1950 Sept. 3, 1954 May 26, 1960 Mar. 20, 1950 Mar. 20, 1950 Mar. 24, 1965 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended Mar. 16, 1938 mar. 20, 1950 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended Sept. 21, 1962 Oct. 15, 1966 Mar. 20, 1950 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended Work Authorized Addition of power and regulating dam with power. GREEN PETER-FOSTER LAKES, OREG. (See Section 54 of Text) Authorized Green-Peter Dam in lieu of originally authorized Sweet Home Lake (1938). Addition of power at Green-Peter and White Bridge Reregulating Dam. Changes location of reregulating dam from White Bridge location to Foster. HILLS CREEK LAKE, OREG. (See Section 55 of Text) Earth and gravel fill dam. JOHN DAY LOCK AND DAM-LAKE UMATILLA OREG. AND WASH. (See Section 56 of Text) Multiple-purpose dam, flood control, navigation and power. John Day waterfowl management area. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. LOOKOUT POINT LAKE, OREG. (See Section 57 of Text) Earth-and-gravel filled dam. Addition of power. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. LOST CREEK LAKE, ROGUE RIVER BASIN, OREG. (See Section 58 of Text) Rock and gravel fill embankment dam, including power. Authorizes construction of project but not operation for irrigation until local interests agree to repay cost allocated. THE DALLES LOCK AND DAM-LAKE CELILO, WASH. AND OREG. (See Section 59 of Text) Multiple-purpose dam, flood control, navigation and power. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. Documents P.L. 858, 80th Cong., 92nd Sess. H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. P.L. 83-780 F.C. Act 1954 S. Doc. 104, 86th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. S. Doc. 28, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 566, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. P.L. 89-689, Public Works Approp. Act, 1967. H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 PORTLAND, OREG., I)ISTRICT TABLE 37-C COLUMBIA AND LOWER WILLAMETTE RIVER BELOW VANCOUVER, WASH., AND PORTLAND, OREG. TOTAL COST OF EXISTING PROJECT TO SEP. 30, 1981 (See Section 2 of Text) Funds New Work Maintenance Total Regular 28,349,304 157,306,108 185,655,412 Public Works 446,296 14,515 460,811 Emergency Relief Administration 138,449 98,668 237,117 Total U.S. 28,934,049 157,419,291 186,353,340 Contributed Prior to 1964 223,026 24,320 247,346 Do (1975) 35 to 49-foot channel 442,928 - 442,928 Total Contributed 665,954 24,320 690,274 Total All Funds 29,600,003 157,443,611 187,043,614 TABLE 37-D WILLAMETTE RIVER AT WILLAMETTE FALLS, OREG. PRINCIPAL FEATURES OF EXISTING CANAL AND LOCKS (See Section 29 of Text) Usable Lock Dimensions Series of 4 locks, each 175 feet by 37 feet Lift of Each Lock Lock 1 (Lower), 22.5 feet; Lock 2, 8.7 feet; Lock 3, 10.9 feet & Lock 4 (Upper), 8.1 feet 2 Depth on Miter Sills at Lower Water Lower Lock, 8.4 feet; Upper Lock, 6 feet Character of Foundation Rock Kind of Dam Fixed3 Type of Construction Concrete Year of Completion 1873; Purchased by United States Apr. 26, 1915 Cost Unknown; purchase price, $375,000 1. A guard lock 210 by 40 feet, which is used only at higher stages of water, is at basin and supplied water for powerplants operated by Crown Zellerbach Corp., upper end of canal basin. and Portland Ry., Light & Power Co., which is now being operated by Portland 2. A concretedivision wall, 1,227 feetlong, extending from Lock 4 to Guard Lock, General Electric Co. separates upper basin of canal from head race, which formerly led directly from 3. The dam is owned by private parties. TABLE 37-E PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS (See Section 26 of Text) Name of Project Date Survey Conducted Cowlitz River, Wash. October 1980 Cushman-Mapleton Channels, Oreg. August 1981 37-41 - REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 37-F OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Section 27 of Text) For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1981 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance ' Alsea River, Oreg.2 Astoria Turning Basin, Oreg.2 14 Cathlamet, Wash.2 14 Clatskanie River, Oreg.2 S Columbia Slough, Oreg.'o Cowlitz River, Wash.2 Cushman-Mapleton Channels (Suislaw River), Oreg.2 14 Deep River, Wash. 2 3 Depoe Bay, Oreg.2 14 Elochoman Slough, Wash.2 3 Grays River, Wash. 2 3 Hammond Small Boat Basin, Oreg.2 6 14 Interstate Highway Bridge (Barge Channel), Oreg.2 14 Multnomah Channel, Oreg. 2 3 Oregon Slough (North Portland Harbor) Oreg. 2 3 Salmon River, Oreg.2 3 Skamokawa (Steamboat Slough), Wash.' � Smith River, Oreg.2 South Slough (Charleston), Oreg.2 14 The Cascades Canal, Columbia River, Oreg.2 11 The Dalles-Celilo Canal, Oreg. and Wash.2 12 Umatilla Harbor, Oreg.'5 16 Westport Slough, Oreg.3 17 Yaquina Bay and Harbor Small Boat Basin, Oreg.'4 Yaquina River, Oreg.2 14 Youngs Bay and Youngs River, Oreg. 2 3 1. Includes Project Condition Surveys. 2. Completed. 3. Channel adequate for present commerce. 4. Includes $15,537 for previous project. 5. Includes $23,489 for previous project. 6. Excludes $75,000 contributed funds. 7. Includes $239,529 for Sec. 107 project and $4,999 for previous project. 8. Excludes $42,000 expended from contributed funds. 9. Excludes$19,555contributed fundsand $67,031 (otherfunds)contributed for additional dredging by Port of Cathlamet. 10. Deauthorized. 11. Project abandoned due to flooding by Bonneville Dam pool. 12. Project abandoned due to flooding by The Dalles Dam pool. 13. Excludes $50,565 contributed funds. 14. Projects authorized by Chief of Engineers (Sec. 107). 15. Project transferred to Portland District from Walla Walla District FY 1974. 16. Project abandoned due to flooding by the John Day Dam pool. 17. Modification for 32-foot channel deauthorized 5 August 1977. 18. Excludes $969,342 contributed funds. 19. Includes $48,184 for previous project. 37-42 1977 1971 1969 1953 1980 1975 1963 1971 1971 1941 1977 1963 1949 1963 1949 1932 1974 1970 1939 1957 1952 1966 1979 1971 1979 2,000 870,139 171,467 19,2404 277,4367 329,423 15,384 145,5888 18,6419 2,500 519,090 15,281 18,112 16,881 2,145 143,120 26,821 3,903,780 4,716,205 16,276 891,69518 195,31313 9,348 206,2955 1,054 1,484,54619 7,080 54,905 33,358 14,757 6,147 109,267 501 235,877 559,858 2,833,888 183,720 73,008 PORTLAND, OREG., DISTRICT Study Identification Fiscal Year Costs (1981) Astoria West Side Boat Basin, Oreg. Charleston Small Boat Harbor, Oreg. Chinook, Wash. Columbia River, Ilwaco, Wash. Coquille River, Bandon Boat Basin, Oreg. Lake River, Wash. Port of Camas - Washougal, Wash. St. Johns Small Boat Basin, Oreg. Siuslaw R&B Small Boat Basin, Oreg. Skamokawa Creek, Skamokawa, Wash. Umpqua River, Winchester Bay, Oreg. Wind River, Wash. TOTAL $ 72,364 35,704 4,552 31,858 15,101 5,000 35,951 20,989 63,608 5,000 80,684 31,147 $ 401,958 TABLE 37-H OTHER AUTHORIZED BRIDGE ALTERATIONS (See Section 25 of Text) For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1981 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Bridges across Columbia River at Cascade Locks and Hood River, Oreg.' 1944 1,081,806 Interstate Bridge, Columbia River, Portland, Oreg. to Vancouver, Wash.' 1961 1,154,1622 2. Non-Federal Funds $1.204.100. TABLE 37-G NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation Activities Pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (preauthorization) (See Section 28 of Text) 1. Completed. 37-43 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 37-I FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS See Section Peak Inflow Storage Used in Text Project Date of Peak Inflow cu. ft./sec. acre/feet 42. Applegate Lake, Oreg. 43. Blue River Lake, Oreg. 44. Cottage Grove Lake, Oreg. 52. Cougar Lake, Oreg. 53. Detroit Lake, Oreg. 46. Dorena Lake, Oreg. 48. Fall Creek Lake, Oreg. 49. Fern Ridge Lake, Oreg. 54. Foster Lake, Oreg. 54. Green Peter Lake, Oreg. 55. Hills Creek Lake, Oreg. 57. Lookout Point Lake, Oreg. 58. Lost Creek Lake, Oreg. 2 December 1980 25 December 1980 16 February 1981 2 December 1980 25 December 1980 18 February 1981 3 December 1980 26 December 1980 19 February 1981 3 December 1980 25 December 1980 19 February 1981 3 December 1980 25 December 1980 16 February 1981 3 December 1980 25 December 1980 16 February 1981 4 December 1980 25 December 1980 20 February 1981 4 December 1980 26 December 1980 17 February 1981 3 December 1980 25 December 1980 16 February 1981 3 December 1980 25 December 1980 16 February 1981 2 December 1980 25 December 1980 16 February 1981 3 December 1980 25 December 1981 19 February 1981 2 December 1980 25 December 1980 16 February 1981 1. Applegate Lake, initially closed December 3, 1980, was still in the process of filling for the first time during FY 1981. Flood control operation this past year was not fully effective as project discharges were increased to prevent lake from filling at a rate in excess of three feet per day during the initial filling. Highest pool attained this year was 20 feet short of maximum conservation pool. 2. Because of low inflow amounts at Lost Creek, the project did not actually operate for flood control by reducing outflows. Storage used was incidental storage in difference between inflow and outflow. 37-44 6,850 1,990 2,780 7,360 8,340 4,930 4,740 1,450 1,540 4,970 8,120 5,340 19,200 35,300 17,300 19,900 5,630 4,800 6,980 4,110 3,740 12,000 7,260 3,290 11,600 11,900 6,680 17,700 29,300 17,300 11,000 9,790 8,010 13,500 12,900 9,040 4,615 4,600 5,600 26,800 29,000 23,900 12,400 4,800 4,500 21,800 30,300 36,900 74,700 84,100 115,600 37,200 8,600 20,200 21,200 15,000 29,100 48,100 31,800 14,900 2,300 1,000 1,000 69,700 93,500 110,500 37,400 23,500 36,800 51,000 47,600 60,400 4,680 7,980 12,860 PORTLAND, OREG., DISTRICT TABLE 37-J LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN, OREG., AND WASH. LEVEES AND IMPROVEMENTS TO EXISTING WORKS (See Section 32 of Text) Estimated Cost of Work Location Approved 1981 Beaver Drainage District, Oreg. Cowlitz County Diking Improvement District 2, Wash. Cowlitz County Diking Improvement District 13, Wash. Cowlitz County Diking Improvement District 15, Wash. Cowlitz County Consolidated Diking Improvement District 2, Wash. Midland Drainage District, Oreg. Multnomah County Drainage District 1, Oreg. Peninsula Drainage District No. 2, Oreg. Rainier Drainage District, Oreg. Sandy Drainage District, Oreg. Sauvie Island Drainage District, Oreg. Scappoose Drainage District, Oreg. Wahkiakum County Consolidated Diking District 1, Wash. Woodson Drainage District, Oreg. Total Estimated Cost, Federal Funds Estimated Non-Federal Cost Locations deauthorized or reclassified inactive or deferred and excluded from above cost estimate: Bachelor Island, Wash. (Deauthorized- 1977) Clatskanie Drainage District, Oreg. (Deauthorized - 1978) Clatskanie River Area, Oreg. (Deauthorized - 1965) Clatsop County Drainage District 1, Oreg. (Deauthorized - 1974) Clatsop County Diking District 4, Oreg. (Deauthorized - 1978) Clatsop County Diking District 6, Oreg. (Deauthorized - 1978) Columbia Drainage District 1, Oreg. Cowlitz County Consolidated Diking Improvement District 1, Wash. (Deauthorized - 1977) Deer Island Drainage District, Oreg. Hayden Island, Oreg. John Drainage District, Oreg. (Deauthorized - 1979) Kalama River Levee, Wash. (Deauthorized - 1978) Lake River Delta Area, Wash. Lewis River Area, Wash. (Deauthorized - 1977) Magruder Drainage District, Oreg. (Deauthorized - 1974) Peninsula Drainage District 1, Oreg. (Deauthorized - 1977) Wahkiakum County Diking District 4, Wash. Cost of These Locations is $ 2,865,000 363,000 65,345 304,794 1,661,367 304,511 1,491,425 2,880,000 593,945 15,0561 674,086 3,570,000 5,341,000 162,500 $20,292,029 $ 4,126,290 1,192,000 (1954) 547,000 (1960) 615,000 (1960) 1,110,000 (1957) 758,000 (1960) $ 4,222,000 1. Cost is for Engineering only. Project was constructed by local interests. 37-45 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 37-K LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN (BANK PROTECTION WORKS), OREG. AND WASH. OPERATION AND RESULTS DURING FISCAL YEAR (See Section 33 of Text) Quantity Location Nature of Work (Linear Feet) Mink Stone revetment 2,975 Tucker Stone revetment 2,350 Wadesky Stone revetment 441 TOTAL 5,766 TABLE 37-L WILLAMETTE RIVER BASIN COMPREHENSIVE PLAN (See Section 37 of Text) Estimated Federal Project Authorizing Act Cost-1981 Blue River Lake, McKenzie Basin' 3 May 17, 1950, H. Doc. 531, $ 32,038,2252 81st Cong. Cascadia Lake, South Santiam River 4 5 Oct. 23, 1962, H. Doc. 403, 104,000,000 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. (1975) Channel Clearing and Snagging on Willamette May 17, 1950, H. Doc. 531, 3,005,000 River and Major Tributaries 6 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. (1960) Channel Improvements for Flood Control and May 17, 1950, H. Doc. 531, 1,214,3002 Major Drainage on 16 Streams 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. Tributary to Willamette River 7 Cottage Grove Lake, Coast Fork' June 28, 938, H. Doc. 544, 4,004,0972 9 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. Cougar Lake, South Fork McKenzie' 3 May 17, 1950, H. Doc. 531, 56,750,4062 11 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. and Sep. 3, 1954, S. Doc. 131, 83rd Cong., 2nd Sess. Detroit Lake, Including Big Cliff Lake, June 28, 1938, H. Doc. 544, 62,729,6982 North Santiam River' 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. and June 30, 1948, Public Law 858. Dorena Lake, Row River' June 28, 1938, H. Doc. 544, 14,115,5352 9 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. Fall Creek Lake, Middle ForkI May 17, 1950, H. Doc. 531 22,118,2492 9 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. Fern Ridge Lake, Long Tom River' June 28, 1938, H. Doc. 544, 8,337,9182 9 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. Gate Creek Lake, McKenzie Basin3 5 Oct. 23, 1962, H. Doc. 403, 127,000,000 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. (1980) 37-46 PORTLAND, OREG., DISTRICT TABLE 37-L WILLAMETTE RIVER BASIN COMPREHENSIVE PLAN (continued) (See Section 37 of Text) Estimated Federal Project Authorizing Act Cost-1981 Green Peter-Foster Lakes, Middle Santiam' 4 May 17, 1950, H. Doc. 531, 84,005,7882 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. and Sep. 3, 1954, S. Doc. 131, 83rd Cong., 2nd Sess. and July 14, 1960, S. Doc. 104, 86th Cong., 2nd Sess. Hills Creek Lake, Middle Fork' May 17, 1950, H. Doc. 531, 45,700,6192 81st Cong. 2nd Sess. Holley Lake, Calapooya River 6 May 17, 1950, H. Doc. 531, 13,300,000 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. (1960) Johnson Creek, Vicinity of Portland, Oreg.' May 17, 1950, H. Doc. 531, 5,020,000 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. (1981) Lookout Point Lake, Including Dexter Lake, June 28, 1938, H. Doc. 544, 88,238,3632 9 Middle Fork' 75th Cong., 3rd Sess., and May 17, 1950, H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. Strube Lake & Cougar Additional Unit, Oct. 23, 1962, H. Doc. 403, 106,000,000 (South Fork McKenzie) (Modification to Cougar Lake) 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. (1981) Waldo Lake Tunnel and Reregulating Works May 17, 1950, H. Doc. 5318 North Fork, Middle Fork, Willamette River 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. Willamette River Bank Protection' June 22, 1936, Special Report 34,600,000 Division Engr., June 28, (1981) 1938, H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess., and May 17, 1950, H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. 1. See individual reports for details of the project. 7. Does not include Reclassified Locations. 2. Actual cost. 8. Authorization rescinded August 28, 1958, Public Law 85-820. 3. For construction in lieu of originally authorized Quartz Creek Lake. 9. Includes cost of Recreation Facilities at Completed Projects (710). 4. For construction in lieu of originally authorized Sweet Home Lake. 10. Deauthorized. 5. Project classified deferred. 11. Does not include$96,000 pro ratashareof site selection costs in lieu of Quartz 6. Project classified inactive. Creek Lake and Strube Lake and Cougar additional unit. 37-47 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 37-M OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 40 of Text) For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1981 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN Blind Slough Diking District, Clatsop County, Oreg.' 1939 163,397 Consolidated Diking and Improvement District 1, Cowlitz County, Wash.' 1941 163,291 Deep River area, Wahkiakum County, Wash.' 1942 69,724 Deer Island area, Columbia County, Oreg.' 1943 574,123 Diking District 2, Clatsop County, Oreg.' 1940 43,150 Diking District 3, Clatsop County, Oreg.15 1938 258 Diking District 5, Clatsop County, Oreg.' 1940 25,609 Diking and Improvement District 5, Cowlitz County, Wash.' 1940 161,381 Diking District 1 and 3 (Puget Island) and Little Island, Wahkiakum County, Wash.' 1941 258,795 Diking Improvement District 1, Pacific County, Wash.' 1941 26,810 Diking and Improvement District 4, Wahkiakum County, Wash.' 1951 169,542 Drainage District 1, Clatsop County, Oreg.' 1939 240,939 John Day River, Oreg., Columbia River Basin Local Flood Protections1 1974 210,220 John Day River area, Clatsop County, Oreg.' 1942 33,080 Karlson Island, Clatsop County, Oreg.' 1941 25,773 Knappa area, Clatsop County, Oreg.' 1942 18,789 Lewis and Clark River area, Clatsop County, Oreg.' 1942 158,419 Magruder Drainage District, Columbia County, Oreg.' 1940 61,186 Marshland Drainage District, Columbia County, Oreg.' 1940 39,475 Midland Drainage District, Columbia County, Oreg.' 1939 77,7743 Multnomah Drainage District 1, Oreg.' 1951 593,0344 Peninsula Drainage District 1, Multnomah County, Oreg.' 1942 211,160 Peninsula Drainage District 2, Multnomah County, Oreg.' 1942 241,148 Prescott area, Columbia County, Oreg."1 1941 125 Rainier Drainage District, Columbia County, Oreg.' 1942 47,662 Sandy Drainage District, Multnomah County, Oreg.' 1942 138,956 Sauvie Island areas A and B, Multnomah County, Oreg.' 1951 1,623,505 Skamokawa Creek area, Wahkiakum County, Wash.' 1946 178,885 Tenasillahe Island, Clatsop County, Oreg.' 1939 133,778 - Upper Grays River area, Wash.' 1947 61,263 30,000 37-48 PORTLAND, OREG., DISTRICT TABLE 37-M OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (continued) (See Section 40 of Text) For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1981 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN (Continued) Walluski River, Clatsop County, Oreg.' 1942 66,932 Warrenton Diking District 1, Clatsop County, Oreg.' 1940 69,503 Warrenton Diking District 2, Clatsop County, Oreg.' 1940 117,143 Warrenton Diking District 3, Clatsop County, Oreg.' 1940 74,596 Webb District Improvement Co., Columbia County, Oreg.' 1940 84,592 Westland District Improvement Co., Columbia County, Oreg.' 1940 205,531 Westport District, Columbia and Clatsop Counties, Oreg.' 1943 40,658 Woodson Drainage District, Columbia County, Oreg.' 1940 22,797 Youngs River Dikes, Clatsop County, Oreg.' 1942 248,802 - Total Columbia River Basin 6,681,805 30,000 LEWIS RIVER BASIN Diking and Improvement District 11, Cowlitz County, Wash.' 1943 172,521 COWLITZ RIVER BASIN Cowlitz County Drainage Improvement District 1, Wash.' 1939 42,978 Diking Improvement District 2, Cowlitz County, Wash.' 1940 121,165 Diking Improvement District 13, Cowlitz County, Wash.' 1939 28,592 Total Cowlitz River Basin 192,735 LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN Bachelor Island, Wash. - - Clatskanie Drainage District, Oreg. 5 1964 18,543 Clatskanie River area, Columbia County, Oreg. 15 1960 268 Clatsop County Drainage District 1, Oreg.'5 1960 4,472 Clatsop County Diking District 4, Oreg.15 Clatsop County Diking District 6, Oreg.15 1961 8,824 Columbia Drainage District 1, Oreg.2 Cowlitz County Consolidated Diking Improvement District 1, Wash.'5 Cowlitz County Consolidated Diking Improvement District No. 2, Wash.1 1977 1,661,367 Cowlitz County Diking Improvement District 2, Wash.' 1967 363,000 Cowlitz County Diking Improvement District 13, Wash.' 1967 65,345 Cowlitz County Diking Improvement District 15, Wash.' 1967 304,794 Deer Island Drainage District, Oreg.2 - - Hayden Island, Oreg.2 1950 - John Drainage District, Oreg. 5 1961 23,754 37-49 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 37-M OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (continued) (See Section 40 of Text) For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1981 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN (Continued) Kalama River (South Area) Levee, Cowlitz County, Wash.15 1969 55,594 Lake River Delta area, Wash.5 - - Lewis River area, Wash.15 Magruder Drainage District, Oreg.s 1960 774 Midland Drainage District, Oreg.' 1971 304,511 Multnomah County Drainage District 1, Oreg.' 1964 1,491,425 Peninsula Drainage District 1, Oreg.15 1961 43,292 Peninsula Drainage District 2, Oreg.2 1961 35,265 Rainier Drainage District, Oreg.' 1967 593,945 Sandy Drainage District, Oreg. 1954 15,0566 Sauvie Island Drainage District, Oreg.' 1966 674,086 Wahkiakum Co. Diking District 4, Wash.2 1971 48,619 Washougal Area Levees, Clark County, Wash.' 1973 1,803,488 Woodson Drainage District, Oreg.' 1964 162,500 Total Lower Columbia River Basin - 7,678,922 WILLAMETTE RIVER BASIN Amazon Creek, Oreg.' 1960 1,214,3007 Area east of Albany, Oreg.'5 - -- Bear Creek, Long Tom River, Oreg.15 1966 4,559 Calapooya River, Oreg. 15 1959 11,595 Cascadia Lake, Oreg.5 1976 1,066,114 Coyote and Spencer Creeks, Long Tom River, Oreg.15 1960 6,819 East Muddy and Lake Creek, Oreg.15 1959 6,465 Ferguson Creek, Long Tom River, Oreg.'5 Flat Creek, Long Tom River, Oreg."1 Floodwall and Levees at Portland, Oreg. "5 Gate Creek Lake, Oreg.5 1972 840,001 Holley Lake, Oreg.5 1963 241,992 Mud and Baskett Slough, Rickreall Creek, Oreg.'5 - -- Turner Prairie, Mill Creek, Oreg.'5 - -- West Muddy Creek and Marys River, Oreg."5 1962 4,056 Wiley Creek Lake, Oreg.s - 112,0009 Willamette Falls Fish Ladder'5 Willamette River Basin Channel clearing and snagging2 - Total Willamette River Basin - 3,552,525 - ALL OTHER FLOOD CONTROL Arlington, Alkali Canyon, Oreg.210"11 1950 23,43912 Beaver Creek near Tillamook, Oreg.' '3 1967 106,198 Castle Rock, Cowlitz River, Wash.' 1957 104,921 Catching Inlet Drainage District, Coos River, Oreg.'13 1959 182,655 37-50 PORTLAND, OREG., DISTRICT TABLE 37-M OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (continued) (See Section 40 of Text) For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1981 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Clackamas River at Dixon Farm Location, Oreg. 13 1952 70,84514 Coquille River, Oreg.'15 1948 908 Cowlitz River at Randle, Wash. 15 1962 11,095 Lower Cowlitz River, Wash.' 1962 181,652 McKenzie River near Walterville, Oreg. 113 1967 148,358 Mill Four Drainage District, Yaquina River, Oreg.' 1948 118,433 Molalla River at Milk Creek location, Oreg. 13 1955 55,007 Molalla River at Ressel location, Oreg. 13 1952 55,189 Pendleton Levees, Umatilla River, Oreg. 1o 1960 (a) Riverside Area Units5 9,100 (b) State Hospital and City Areas (Zone 1)' 1959 267,748 (c) State Hospital and City Areas (Zone 2)1 13 1960 161,540 Pendleton, Umatilla River, Oreg.1 o 1939 143,263 Pilot Rock, Birch Creek, Oreg.1 15 1963 4,558 Prineville Area, Crooked River and Ochoco Creek, Oreg. 15 1962 11,318 Reedsport Levees, Umpqua River, Oreg.1'3 1971 968,71616 Salmon Creek at Oakridge, Oreg. 113 1960 288,447 Stillwell Drainage District, Tillamook Bay, Oreg. 1' 1961 176,351 Umatilla River (Echo), Columbia River Basin, Oreg. 10 15 1960 24,145 Umpqua River and tributaries, Oreg.' 1952 428,881 Vicinity of Nehalem, Nehalem River, Oreg.' 1952 45,677 Total All Other Flood Control 3,588,444 1. Completed. 9. Pro rata share of site selection studies. 2. Classified inactive. 10. Reported by Walla Walla District prior to 1974. 3. Includes $26,241, Emergency Relief Act funds. 11. Abandoned. Necessity fordevelopment waseliminated when Lake Umatilla 4. In addition $25,000 contributed funds expended for new work. was created. 5. Deferred. 12. Includes $3,328spent in fiscal year 1960 under authorization of P.L. 685, 84th 6. Cost is for engineering only. Project was constructed by local interests. Congress. See Annual Report for fiscal year 1960, page 1887. 7. In addition $154,751 contributed funds expended for new work, $88,784 13. Authorized by Chief of Engineers. "Required" and $65,967 "Other". 14. In addition $2,520 contributed funds expended for new work. 8. Recommendation for early authorization rescinded by S. Doc. 104, 86th Cong., 15. Deauthorized. 2d Sess. in Flood Control Act 1960. 16. Excludes $230,070contributed funds for new work and $31,284 Government furnished sheet steel pile. 37-51 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 37-N FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Section 41 of Text) Flood Control Activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization) Study Identification Fiscal Year Costs (1981) Clatsop Co. Drainage District No. 5, Oreg. $ 449 Snagging and Clearing Navigable Streams and Tributaries in the Interest of Flood Control (Sec. 208, 1954 Flood Control Act, P.L. 780, 83rd Congress). Project and Location Fiscal Year Costs (1981) Stage Gulch, Stanfield, Oreg. $8,874 Emergency Bank Protection (Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Congress). Project and Location Fiscal Year Costs (1981) Depoe Bay, Lincoln County, Oreg. $ 22,963 Sandy River & Sleepy Hollow, Oreg. 247,935 Tollbridge Location, Hood River, Oreg. 7,384 Trask River, Tone Road, Tillamook Co., Oreg. 8,842 Woodworth Location, Hood River, Oreg. 6,518 TOTAL $ 293,642 37-52 PORTLAND, OREG., DISTRICT TABLE 37-0 PRINCIPAL DATA CONCERNING NAVIGATION LOCK, SPILLWAY DAM AND POWERPLANT Project Bonneville Lock and Dam, Oreg. and Wash. - Lake Bonneville (See Section 51 of Text) NAVIGATION LOCK Dimensions: Clear Width of Chamber Greatest Length Available for Full Width Lift (Vertical): At Extreme Low Water and Normal Pool Level At Normal River Stage At Extreme High Water Depth Over Miter Sills at Adopted Low Water Character of Foundation Opened to Navigation SPILLWAY DAM Type of Construction Completed Capacity Elevation of Gate Sills on Crest of Spillway Height Above Lowest Foundation Length of Dam Proper Length of Dam Overall Width at Base Gate Openings Crest Overflow (Above Mean Sea Level) Pool Elevation (Normal) (Above Mean Sea Level) POWERPLANT Length Width Height (Roof to Bedrock) Generator (Station Unit) Generators Total Rated Capacity Speed 76 Feet 500 Feet 66 Feet 59 Feet About 30 Feet 24.2 Feet Andesite January 1938 Concrete Gravity 1938 1,600,000 Cubic Feet Per Second 23.3 Feet About 170 Feet 1,090 Feet 1,230 Feet 200 Feet 18 24 Feet 72 Feet 1,027 Feet 190 Feet 190 Feet 1-4,000 kw 0.8 Power Factor 1-51,500 kw 0.9 Power Factor 1-43,200 kw 0.9 Power Factor 8-54,000 kw 0.9 Power Factor 526,700 kw 0.9 Power Factor 75 Revolutions per Minute John Day Lock and Dam, Lake Umatilla Oreg. and Wash. (See Section 56 of Text) NAVIGATION Clear Width Clear Length Lift: Minimum Average Maximum 86 Feet 669 Feet 97 Feet 105 Feet 113 Feet 37-53 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 37-0 PRINCIPAL DATA CONCERNING NAVIGATION (continued) LOCK, SPILLWAY DAM AND POWERPLANT Project The Dalles Lock and Dam Wash. and Oreg.-Lake Celilo (See Section 59 of Text) Minimum Water Depth Over Sills Opened to Navigation SPILLWAY DAM Type of Construction Completed Maximum Capacity Crest Elevation Control Gates: Type Size, Width by Height Number POWERPLANT Length Width Generating Units: Number Installed Space for Additional Rating, Each Total Installed Capacity Total Potential Capacity Maximum Structural Height First Power-On-Line IMPOUNDMENT Elevations: Normal Operating Range Maximum Flood Control Storage Lake Length Lake Water Surface Area at Elevation 268 Navigation Channel, Depth by Width Length of Shoreline NAVIGATION LOCK Type Lift Normal Net Clear Length Net Clear Width Normal Depth Over Upper Sill Minimum Depth Over Lower Sill Opened to Navigation SPILLWAY DAM Type Elevation of Crest Top of Crest Gates Number of Gates Size of Gates 15 Feet April 1968 Concrete Gravity March 1968 2,250,000 cfs 210 Tainter 50 Ft. by 58.5 Ft. 20 1,975 Feet 243 Feet 16 4 135,000 kw 2,160,000 kw 2,700,000 kw 235 Feet July 1968 268-257 276 500,000 Ac.-Ft. 76.4 Miles 55,000 Acres 15 Ft. by 250 Ft. 200 Miles Single Lift 87.5 Feet 675 Feet 86 Feet 20 Feet 15 Feet March 17, 1957 Controlled 121 Ft. msl 162 Ft. msl 23 50 by 43 Feet 37-54 PORTLAND, OREG., DISTRICT TABLE 37-0 PRINCIPAL DATA CONCERNING NAVIGATION (continued) LOCK, SPILLWAY DAM AND POWERPLANT Project Height (Foundation to Crest) 120 Feet Design Flood 2,290,000 cfs POWERPLANT Powerhouse Dimensions 240 by 2,150 Feet Generators Main Units 14 @ 78,000 kw each Generators Main Units Additional 8 @ 85,975 kw Each Total Rated Capacity Ultimate 22- 1,779,800 kw Fishwater Supply Units 2 @ 13,500 kw Each Station Service Units 2 @ 3,000 kw Each TABLE 37-P OTHER AUTHORIZED MULTIPLE-PURPOSE PROJECTS, INCLUDING POWER (See Section 60 of Text) For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1981 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Restoration of Indian Fishing Grounds, Bonneville, Oreg. 1969 185,000 Waldo Lake Tunnel, Oreg.' 1. Authorization rescinded August 28, 1958 (Public Law 85-820). 37-55 SEATTLE, WASH., DISTRICT* This District comprises Washington except southern and Ocean south of international boundary to Cape Disappointsoutheastern portions, northern Idaho, and northwestern ment, and to Columbia River above Yakima River, inclusively. Montana embraced in drainage basins tributary to Pacific IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page Channels and Harbors 1. Anacortes Harbor, Wash. ........................ 38-2 2. Bellingham Harbor, Wash. ....................... 38-2 3. Bellingham, Squalicum Small Boat Harbor, Wash ................................. 38-2 4. East Bay Marina, Olympia Harbor, Wash. ................... ................ 38-2 5. Ediz Hook, Wash. ............................... 38-3 6. Everett Harbor and Snohomish River, Wash. ................................... 38-3 7. Friday Harbor Marina, Wash. .................... 38-4 8. Grays Harbor and Chehalis River, Wash. .................................. 38-4 9. Kenmore Navigation Channel, Wash. .................................. 38-5 10. Lake Crockett,Wash. ...... ....................... 38-5 11. Neah Bay, Wash. ................................ 38-5 12. Puget Sound and its Tributary Waters, Wash. ......................... 38-5 13. Quillayute River, Wash. .......................... 38-6 14. Seattle Harbor, Wash ..... .................... 38-6 15. Swinomish Channel, Wash. ....................... 38-6 16. Tacoma Harbor, Wash. ........................... 38-7 17. Westhaven Cove Small Boat Basin (Westport Marina), Wash. ........................ 38-7 18. Willapa River and Harbor and Naselle River, Wash ............................ 38-7 ,19. Project Condition Surveys ........................ 38-8 20. Other Authorized Navigation Projects ......................................... 38-8 21. Navigation Work under Special Authorization .................................. 38-8 Locks and Dams 22. Lake Washington Ship Canal, Wash. .............. 38-8 Flood Control Local Protection 23. Clark Fork River, Missoula, Mont. ................ 38-9 24. Flathead River near Kalispell, Mont. ................. ....... ................ 38-9 * All cost and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. Flood Control Page Local Protection 25. Okanogan River, Omak, Wash.................. 38-9 26. Okanogan River, Oroville, Wash. .............. 38-9 27. Placer Creek, Idaho ............................ 38-10 28. Skagit River, Wash. (Levee and Channel Improvements) ........................ 38-10 29. Stillaguamish River, Wash. .................. 38-10 30. Tacoma, Puyallup River, Wash.................. 38-10 31. Willapa River at Raymond, Wash ............. 38-11 32. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ............................... 38-11 33. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ................. ............... 38-11 34. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization .......................... 38-11 Reservoirs 35. Howard A. Hanson Dam, Wash.............. 38-11 36. Mud Mountain Dam, Wash..................... 38-12 37. Wynoochee Lake, Wash ...................... 38-12 38. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations ........................ 38-12 Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 39. Albeni Falls Dam, Idaho ..................... 38-12 40. Chief Joseph Dam - Rufus Woods Lake, Wash. .................................. 38-13 41. Libby Dam - Lake Koocanusa, M ont. ....................................... 38-13 42. Other Authorized Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power ...................... 38-14 General Investigations 43. Surveys .................... ................ 38-14 44. Collection and Study of Basic Data ................................. 38-14 45. Research and Development ................... 38-14 All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 38-1 I REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 Navigation 1. ANACORTES HARBOR, WASH. Location. On northern point of Fidalgo Island in Puget Sound, 17 miles south of Bellingham, Wash., and 64 miles north of Seattle. The main harbor is on Guemes Channel. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18427.) Existing project. Channel in Capsante Waterway, 12 feet deep and 150 to 250 feet wide, between east side of Q Avenue and deep water in Fidalgo Bay, a distance of 2,850 feet; and mooring basin 12 feet deep, 570 feet wide, and 960 feet long adjacent to north side of Capsante Waterway, protected by two pile breakwaters, each 470 feet long, east and southeast of basin. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 8.2 feet. Extreme range is about 15.5 feet. (See Table 38-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Expended $59,523 contributed funds. Other non-Federal costs are estimated at $98,000 (July 1958). Terminal facilities. There are 24 piers and wharves in the Port of Anacortes; 15 on Guemes Channel, 3 on Capsante Waterway, and 7 on Fidalgo Bay. Three wharves on Guemes Channel are open for public use; of these, one is publicly owned and operated and used for handling general cargo in foreign and domestic trade. In addition, two wharves are used for ferries plying to the San Juan Islands and to Vancouver Island, British Columbia. Both are publicly owned and operated. Two of the wharves on Capsante Waterway and basin are publicly owned and operated and used for receiving petroleum products, and as a moorage for fishing and pleasure craft. All other wharves are used for general industrial purposes. In addition, there are two oil-refinery wharves located to the south of Capsante Waterway that are privately owned and operated and used for handling petroleum products in foreign and domestic trade. These facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 37-Ports of Everett, Bellingham, Port Angeles, and Anacortes, Wash., revised 1976). Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Routine condition and operation studies were conducted throughout the year. Maintenance, contract: A contract was awarded in August 1981 for dredging of channel in Capsante Waterway and is scheduled for completion in November 1981, with 20,600 cubic yards of material being removed at a cost of $90,363. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was completed in July 1957, excluding the inactive portion and inner portion of boat basin. For further details, see Annual Report for 1958. 2. BELLINGHAM HARBOR, WASH. Location. Part of Bellingham Bay, an arm of Puget Sound, at Bellingham, in northwestern Washington. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18424.) Previous projects. For details see page 2006 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1888 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Channel 30 feet deep in Whatcom Creek Waterway from deep water to head of harbor, 363.2 feet wide to 750 feet from inner end, thence 18 feet deep for inner 750 feet; Squalicum Creek Waterway, including dredging an entrance channel 200 feet wide and 26 feet deep from deep water in the bay to main pierhead line, and maintenance of southerly half and westerly end of Squalicum Creek basin to 26 feet deep, provided that no dredging can be done within 75 feet of wharves, piers, or similar structures; and small-boat basin adjacent to Squalicum Creek Waterway by construction and maintenance of two sections of rubblemound breakwater with combined length of 5,400 feet, including maintenance of minimum depths of 12 feet in entrance to basin. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 8.6 feet. Extreme range is about 16 feet. (See Table 38-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. $31,581 in funds contributed by Port of Bellingham have been expended. In complying with terms of local cooperation, the port expended $2,157,473 for bulkheads, groins, dredging, mooring and terminal facilities and utilities, and land development. Terminal facilities. Of the forty wharves and piers in Bellingham Harbor, 9 are on Whatcom Creek Waterway; 3 on Squalicum Creek Waterway; 3 on I&J Street Waterway; and 9 on Bellingham Bay. Two wharves on Whatcom Creek Waterway serve general cargo terminals. One is publicly owned and operated and is suitable for use by ocean-going vessels; the other one is privately owned and operated. Also, there is one publicly owned terminal and small boat harbor with 11 wharves handling private craft and fishing boats. (See Port Series No. 37-Ports of Everett, Bellingham, Port Angeles, and Anacortes, Wash., revised 1976.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Conducted channel condition surveys. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project completed February 1, 1961. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1961.) 3. BELLINGHAM, SQUALICUM SMALL BOAT HARBOR, WASH. Location. The existing Squalicum Small Boat Harbor is located at Bellingham, Washington, about 88 miles north of Seattle and is the only protected year-round public moorage in Bellingham Bay. Existing project. Includes construction of new rubblemound breakwater, dredging of the entrance and access channels and turning basin. Approximately 960,000 cubic yards of material were dredged, creating a 40-acre basin. The dredged material was placed behind dikes to develop approximately 46 acres of backup land for support facilities and a marine park. (See Table 38-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Federal dredging of about 350,000 cubic yards was completed in October 1980. Condition at end of fiscal year. Breakwater construction is complete. 4. EAST BAY MARINA, OLYMPIA HARBOR, WASH. Location. The City of Olympia, capital of the State of Washington, is located at the extreme southern end of Puget Sound. East Bay is just north of Olympia. 38-2 SEATTLE, WASH., DISTRICT Existing project. Construction of 700 feet of concrete floating breakwater and dredging of the entrance and access channels and a turning basin for a new 800-boat marina. (See Table 38-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. By local cooperation agreement of 11 March 1981, the Port ofOlympia agreed to provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way required for construction and subsequent maintenance of the project and for aids to navigation upon the request of the Chief of Engineers, including suitable areas determined by the Chief of Engineers to be required in the general public interest for initial and subsequent disposal of dredged material as well as the necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads, and embankments or the costs of such works; accomplish without cost to the United States all alterations and relocations as required of buildings, roads, utilities, and other structures and improvements; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction, operation, and maintenance of the project except for damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; provide and maintain without cost to the United States adequate berthing areas and local access channels with depths commensurate with those in the Federal improvements, and necessary mooring facilities, utilities, a public landing with suitable water supply and essential sanitary facilities, a boat launching ramp, parking area, and access roads open to all on equal terms; provide a cash contribution equal to 50 percent of the final project costs allocated to general navigation; provide a cash contribution equal to 50 percent of the final cost of construction of recreational facilities on the floating breakwater and the access facilities thereto, and 100 percent of the final cost of construction of tieup servicing facilities on the floating breakwater; maintain without cost to the United States all recreational and tieup and servicing facilities associated with the floating breakwater; provide a cash contribution of 100 percent of costs allocated to land enhancement; operate and maintain without cost to the United States all mitigation features required for the project, including performing water quality monitoring of the boat basin; pay all project costs in excess of the Federal cost limitation of $2 million as provided in Public Law 86-645, as amended, and provided that the improvement for navigation may be undertaken independently of providing public recreational facilities whenever the required cooperation for navigation has been furnished; retain control of project lands, developed from dredged material, that are necessary to achieve projected benefits; and provide without cost to the United States, the mitigation features listed in paragraph 5-17 of the District Engineer's report dated December 1980, and provide with indicated Federal participation the mitigation feature listed in paragraph 5-18. Operations and results during fiscal year. Project was approved for construction 13 May 1981. Preparation of plans and specifications for dredging and the floating breakwater was initiated in March 1981. Condition at end of fiscal year. A dredging contract was advertised 29 September 1981. Plans and specifications for the floating breakwater were underway and about 40 percent complete. 5. EDIZ HOOK, WASH. Locaton. Ediz Hook and the City of Port Angeles are on the Strait of Juan de Fuca in Clallam County, Washington, about 100 miles northwest of Seattle. Existing project. Provides for about 13,300 lineal feet of rock revetment and 3,100 lineal feet of rock blanketing, together with initial beach replenishment and annual nourishment. (See Table 38-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Condition survey of revetment and immediate offshore area accomplished. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed on 31 October 1978. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1979.) 6. EVERETT HARBOR AND SNOHOMISH RIVER, WASH. Location. On Port Gardner Bay, at northern end of Possession Sound, an arm of Puget Sound at Everett, in northwestern Washington; and Snohomish River for 6.3 miles above mouth. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18443.) Previous projects. For details see page 704 of Annual Report for 1905, page 2005 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1883 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Training dike extending from a point opposite 23d Street northward 12,550 feet to outlet of Snohomish River, with spur dike extending 400 feet to pierhead line from north end of main dike; spur dike extending 1,410 feet westward from Preston Point; removal of a section of training dike north of Snohomish River outlet; channel 150 to 425 feet wide and 15 feet deep from deep water in Port Gardner Bay to 14th Street dock; thence a settling basin 700 feet wide, 1,200 feet long, and 20 feet deep, thence a channel 150 feet wide and 8 feet deep up river to head of Steamboat Slough, a total distance of about 6.3 miles; settling basin within upper channel reach about 1 mile long with a capacity of 1 million cubic yards and maintaining East Waterway to 30 feet deep. The 1968 modification included raising the southerly 4,100 feet of existing training dike, extending the training dike 1,500 feet farther south, and constructing a breakwater along the south and west sides of the existing small boat basin. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 11.1 feet. Extreme tidal range is about 19 feet. The boat basin breakwater has been deleted at the request of the local sponsor, and the remainder of the 1968 modification has been deferred indefinitely. (See Table 38-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests must provide disposal areas for maintenance dredging including diking of those areas upstream of the 14th Street boat basin. Local interests are also required to provide and maintain an adequate public landing or wharf, with provisions for sale of motor fuel, lubricants, and potable water, access roads, parking areas, and other necessary public-use shore facilities; and make utility and other relocations or alterations as required for project purposes. Terminal facilities. There are 42 piers and wharves in the Port of Everett, 17 in Port Gardner and 25 on the Snohomish River. These include: 19 publicly owned terminals with 4 berths handling ocean-going vessels and 1 publicly owned terminal and small-boat basin handling fishing and pleasure craft. The rest are at Bayside and the Snohomish River. 38-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Channel condition surveys were conducted throughout the year. The Snohomish River navigation channel downstream of Preston Point was slightly realigned to take advantage of naturally deep water and reduce maintenance dredging requirements. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was completed in April 1963 except for the 1968 Modification, which has been deferred. whenever the required cooperation for navigation has been furnished. Operations and results during fiscal year. Project was approved for construction on 9 July 1981. Preparation of plans and specifications was initiated in August 1981. Condition at end of fiscal year. Plans and specifications are about 5 percent complete. 8. GRAYS HARBOR AND 7. FRIDAY HARBOR MARINA, WASH. CHEHALIS RIVER, WASH. Location. Friday Harbor is located on the eastern shore of San Juan Island on the inland waters of northwestern Washington, about 28 nautical miles east of Victoria, British Columbia, and 60 nautical miles north of Seattle, Washington. San Juan Island is one of over 170 islands in the San Juan Archipelago. Friday Harbor is the San Juan County seat and a United States Customs Port of Entry. Previous projects. An unfavorable Detailed Project Report was submitted 17 May 1972 and termination of study was approved by Office of the Chief of Engineers 9 June 1972, as the Port of Friday Harbor withdrew as local sponsor. Costs in the amount of $43,037 were expended. See Annual Reports for Fiscal Years 1970, 1971, and 1972, Navigation Work under Special Authorization. Existing project. Construction of a breakwater seaward of the existing breakwater to protect the existing port facilities and to allow the port to provide 294 additional permanent moorage spaces and 44 additional transient spaces. The moorage area would be protected by 1,600 feet of concrete floating breakwaters. (See Table 38-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. By letter dated 27 March 1981, the Port of Friday Harbor agreed to provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way required for construction and subsequent maintenance of the project and for aids to navigation upon request of the Chief of Engineers; accomplish without cost to the United States all alterations and relocations as required of buildings, roads, utilities, and other structures and improvements; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction, operation, and maintenance of the project, except for damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; provide and maintain without cost to the United States adequate berthing areas and local access channels with depths commensurate with those in the Federal improvements, and necessary mooring facilities, utilities, a public landing with suitable water supply and essential sanitary facilities, parking area, and access roads open to all on equal terms; provide a cash contribution equal to 48 percent of the final project costs allocated to general navigation; provide a cash contribution equal to 50 percent of the final cost of construction of recreational facilities on the floating breakwater and the access facilities thereto and 100 percent of the final cost of construction of tieup servicing facilitieson the floatingbreakwater; maintain withoutcostto the United States all recreational and tieup and servicing facilities associated with the floating breakwater; pay all project costs in excess of the Federal cost limitation of $2 million as provided in Public Law 86-645, as amended, and provided that the improvement for navigation may be undertaken independently of providing public recreational facilities Location. Harbor lies at mouth of Chehalis River, in southwestern part of Washington, 45 miles north ofentranceto Columbia River. Inner portion comprises two main channels, the south and the north, connecting harbor proper with Chehalis River at Aberdeen. Chehalis River rises in southwestern part of Washington about 40 miles east of Pacific Ocean, flows generally northwesterly and empties into eastern part of Grays Harbor. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18502.) Previous projects. For details see pages 2002-03 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1863 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Provides for an entrance channel across the bar 600 feet wide and 30 feet deep, to be secured by a south jetty 13,734 feet long and a north jetty 17,200 feet long, both at an elevation of 16 feet, and by dredging; maintenance of channel 30 feet deep and 350 feet wide from deep water in Grays Harbor 14 miles to Cow Point; thence 30 feet deep and 200 feet wide, suitably widened at bends, to a point 13,700 feet upstream from Union Pacific Railroad bridge atAberdeen, a distance of 4.125 miles; a turning basin 30 feet deep, 550 feet wide, and 1,000 feet long at upstream end of 30-foot channel near Cosmopolis; a channel 14 feet deep and 100 feet wide in South Bay to Bay City; three breakwaters at, and maintenance of entrance channel to Westhaven Cove; and protection of Point Chehalis for an exposed length of about 7,500 feet. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 8.9 feet at Point Chehalis, 10.1 feet at Aberdeen, and 8.1 feet at Montesano. Extreme range is 17.5 feet at Point Chehalis, 17.8 feet at Aberdeen, and 23.8 feet at Montesano (river flood of 1935). (See Table 38-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. In Aberdeen, there are 2 terminals with 7 berths owned by the Port of Grays Harbor handling ocean-going vessels and 10 usable privately owned piers and wharves; and 1 each at Markham and Cosmopolis, 7 at Hoquiam, 5 private wharves and 1 Coast Guard station at Westhaven Cove. Of the 22 privately owned, 1 is used for the receiptof sand and gravel, 3 for fish, and 7 for lumberorlogs. In addition, there are 8 log dumps or receiving areas in Grays Harbor. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Channel condition surveys were conducted throughout the year. Maintenance, contract: Approximately 1,328,600 cubic yards of shoaled material were removed from the North Channel, Crossover, South Channel, Hoquiam, and Cow Point reaches of the project by hopper barge and clamshell dredge between February and September at a cost of $2,221,450. 38-4 SEATTLE, WASH., DISTRICT Code 713 Funds. Negotiations for recreation cost sharing, begun in April 1978 with the Port of Grays Harbor, were finalized in June 1981. A contract for construction of a viewing tower and parking facilities will be awarded by the port. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was completed in March 1965, except for the deferred and inactive portions. Rehabilitation of 4,000 feet of the south jetty was completed in October 1966. South Channel realinement was completed December 1978. For further details, see Annual Report for 1967. 9. KENMORE NAVIGATION CHANNEL, WASH. Location. The Kenmore Navigation Channel lies at the northern end of Lake Washington adjacent to the Sammamish River. Kenmore, an unincorporated industrial and business center in King County just north of Seattle, Washington, encompasses the lands to the north of the channel. Existing project. The construction of a navigation channel to serve the Kenmore industrial area, King County, Washington involves a 15-foot-deep channel which would consist of a 100-foot-wide inner channel 900 feet long, an 800-foot-long transition channel with a 240 30-foot bend and a maximum width of 190 feet, and a 120-foot-wide outer channel 1,200 feet long. Dredged material from the construction of the navigation channel was disposed in open water at Four Mile Rock in Elliott Bay in Puget Sound. The project also consists of the installation of a goose nest area on property adjacent to the new channel as mitigation for the removal of goose nests on the existing jetty which was removed during construction of the project. The U.S. Coast Guard installed and maintains aids to navigation for the project. Maintenance dredging will be provided by the Corps of Engineers after completion of the project. Local interests will maintain the goose nest area. (See Table 38-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Dredging began in November 1980 and was completed in March 1981. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction is complete. 10. LAKE CROCKETT, WASH. Location. The harbor is on the west side of Whidbey Island, about 35 nautical miles north of Seattle, Washington. The lake lies parallel to Admiralty Bay and is separated from it by a narrow strip of gravel beach. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18441.) Existing project. Provides for a basin in Lake Crockett with an area of about 6 acres and 18 feet deep at mean lower low water, connected with Admiralty Bay by a channel of the same depth and 150 feet wide, protected by a breakwater. The diurnal tidal range in Admiralty Bay is 8.4 feet and the extreme range is about 16.5 feet. (See Table 38-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. One publicly owned and privately operated passenger and automobile ferry landing within the dredged basin is open for public use, and is adequate for existing commercial traffic. The basin contains two publicly owned boat ramps open for public use. The ramps are adequate for recreational craft. Operations and results during fiscal year. Regular funds: Maintenance, hired labor: Channel condition survey conducted. Maintenance, contract: Performed maintenance dredging of 25,560 cubic yards from entrance channel in October/November 1980 at a cost of $112,352. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was completed in January 1948. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1948.) Recreational facilities at project were completed in 1980 under cost-sharing agreement with Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission. 11. NEAH BAY, WASH. Location. On south side of the Strait of Juan de Fuca, 5 miles east of Cape Flattery, at the entrance to the Strait from the Pacific Ocean, and about 60 miles west of Port Angeles, Wash. (See NOAA Survey Charts 18480, 18485 and 18484.) Existing project. Provides for (1) rubblestone breakwater about 8,000 feet long between Waada Island and the westerly shore of the bay; and (2) reinforcement of existing rock revetment extending approximately 2,200 feet west from Baada Point, and about an 800-foot extension of the revetment westward. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 8.2 feet. Extreme range is 15.8 feet. (See Table 38-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. There have been no non-Federal costs. Terminal facilities. There are six wharves at Neah Bay, including two owned by the United States which are used by the Coast Guard, and four privately owned wharves, three of which are open to general public use to accommodate small commercial fishing vessels. In addition to the wharves, there is a facility for dumping and rafting logs. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during period. Maintenance, hired labor: None. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was completed in July 1956. Breakwater was completed in February 1944. Breakwater repairs were completed in August 1980 with 51,166 tons of quarry rock along 4,200 feet for a total cost of $1,360,216. Reinforcement and extension of revetment to the 3,000-foot length authorized by the 1954 Act were completed in July 1956. 12. PUGET SOUND AND ITS TRIBUTARY WATERS, WASH. Location. Puget Sound is in western part of Washington. Cities of Seattle, Tacoma, Olympia, Everett, Bellingham, and many small towns are on its bays and inlets. (See NOAA Survey Charts 18400, 18441 and 18448.) Previous projects. For details, see page 2003 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1869 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Maintenance of Puget Sound and its tributary waters by snagging and dredging; and removal, in cooperation with City of Seattle, of floating debris from Seattle Harbor area. (See Table 38-B for authorizing legislation.) 38-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 Local cooperation. None required. City of Seattle is cooperating in a program for control of floating debris in Seattle Harbor. Terminal facilities. Terminal facilities at numerous localities on Puget Sound and its tributary waters are, in general, considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: U.S. debris boats W T Preston and Puget are operated continuously throughout Puget Sound and its tributary waters, removing floating debris and hazards to navigation. Debris is loaded aboard barges and disposed of by contract. Snagging operations were accomplished at Blaine Harbor, Bellingham Harbor, Swinomish Channel, Skagit River, Everett Harbor, Lake Washington Ship Canal, Lake Washington, Tacoma Harbor, Olympia Harbor, Duwamish River and at Elliott Bay. A study of the efficiency of the debris collection and disposal operations was completed. This evaluation resulted in the decision to retire the debris vessel W T Preston early in FY 1982. Maintenance, contract: 1,397 tons of harbor debris were disposed of. Current contractor is recycling approximately 90 percent of the debris and placing the remainder in a landfill. Condition at end of fiscal year. Work consists of collecting floating and partially floating logs and larger-sized debris from Puget Sound and Federally authorized channels. 13. QUILLAYUTE RIVER, WASH. Location. River is formed by junction of Soleduck and Bogachiel Rivers, in northwestern Washington, and flows westerly 5 miles to Pacific Ocean at La Push, about 30 miles south of Cape Flattery. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18480.) Existing project. Provides for: (a) Jetty 15 feet high on easterly side of river mouth, and a dike on westerly side, with a view of stabilizing entrance; (b) channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide extending 2,000 feet upstream from deep water; and (c) basin 10 feet deep, 300 to 425 feet wide, and 2,400 feet long upstream of channel. Section included in project is 4,400 feet long. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water at La Push is 8.3 feet. Extreme range is about 15 feet. (See Table 38-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Expended $20,000 contributed funds. Terminal facilities. There are 7 wharves or docks at La Push, near the mouth of the Quillayute River; 6 are privately owned. The seventh is owned by the United States, and is used by the Coast Guard. In addition, there is a protected boat basin owned by the Port of Port Angeles and used by fishing boats and pleasure craft. With the exception of the boat basin, these facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Condition surveys and studies were made of the river channel throughout the year. Entrance channel emergency snagging and minor dredging were performed in July 1981 by U.S. snagboat Puget at a cost of $8,690. Maintenance, contract: In February and March 1981, 24,022 cubic yards were dredged from the south end of the boat basin and from the entrance channel at a cost of $169,618. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was completed in February 1960. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1963.) The spit which protects the boat basin and navigation channel was nourished in conjunction with channel dredging contract completed in June 1973 and in 1977. The spit was rehabilitated with rock in 1974 and 1979-80. The channel upstream of the boat basin has been classified as inactive. 14. SEATTLE HARBOR, WASH. Location. Harbor at Seattle, Wash., includes all waterways within city limits. Chief anchorage basin is Elliott Bay, an arm of Puget Sound. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18450.) Existing project. Maintenance of East and West Waterways, 34 feet deep and 750 feet wide for 6,500 and 5,200 feet, respectively, from pierhead line in Elliott Bay; maintenance of East Waterway between upper end of 750-foot section and Spokane Street, 34 feet deep, 700 feet long, and 400 feet wide, and a turning basin, including head of East Waterway at junction of waterways south of Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad Bridge, to 30 feet deep, after these sections of waterway are dredged by local interests to full project dimensions; and dredging Duwamish Waterway 200 feet wide and 30 feet deep between West Waterway and First Avenue South, 150 by 20 feet between First and Eighth Avenues South, thence 150 feet by 15 feet to a point about 1.4 miles above 14th Avenue South Bridge, with turning basin 600 by 350 feet and 20 feet deep just south oflFirst'Avenue South Bridge, and turning basin 500 by 250 feet and 15 feet deep, and settling basin of about 100,000 cubic yards capacity at upper end of waterway, a distance of 5.12 miles. Total length of waterways included in project is about 7.5 miles. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 11.3 feet. Extreme tidal range is 19.3 feet. (See Table 38-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Complied with, except for inactive portion of project. Terminal facilities. There are 102 wharves and piers on Seattle Harbor, exclusive of those given in report for Lake Washington Ship Canal. These facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce and are described in Port Series No. 36-The Port of Seattle, Wash., revised 1975. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Condition surveys made of channels. Maintenance, contract: 120,510 cubic yards of material removed from Duwamish Waterway at upper end above First Avenue South Bridge during February and March 1981 at a cost of $290,844. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was completed in 1931, except settling basin at upstream end of project, which is classified inactive, and East Waterway above the 750-foot section. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1932.) 15. SWINOMISH CHANNEL, WASH. Location. An inland passage, 11 miles long, between Saratoga Passage and Padilla Bay, in northwestern part of Washington, about 60 miles north of Seattle. (See NOAA Survey Charts 18400, 18427 and 18421.) Existing project. A channel 100 feet wide and 12 feet deep for 11 miles from deep water in Saratoga Passage to deep water in Padilla Bay, by dredging and dike construction where necessary; and removal of projecting rocky points of McGlinn and Fidalgo Islands obstructing navigation at "Hole-in-theWall". Plane of 38-6 SEATTLE, WASH., DISTRICT reference is mean lower low water. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 11.5 feet at south end of channel, 8.4 feet at north end, and 10 feet at La Conner. Extreme tidal range is about 19.5 feet at south end of channel and about 16 feet at north end. (See Table 38-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 18 wharves, docks, and piers on Swinomish Channel, all but 3 of which are privately owned. Of these, 1 is used for handling general cargo, 5 are used exclusively for moorage, unloading, and servicing of fishing vessels; 2 are used for handling petroleum products; 3 facilities are used for log dumps; and 2 for handling nonmetallic minerals. Three publicly owned facilities for launching, mooring, and servicing small craft are within the city limits of La Conner. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Condition surveys were made of various reaches of the channel. Maintenance, contract: In December 1981, 70,226 cubic yards of material were removed by hopper barge at a cost of $147,750. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was completed in March 1965. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1965.) The south jetty west of Goat Island has been rehabilitated to reduce shoaling from the Skagit River delta area. 16. TACOMA HARBOR, WASH. Location. Harbor includes Commencement Bay and tributary waterways at Tacoma, in Northwestern Washington (See NOAA Survey Chart 18453.) Previous projects. For details see pages 1372 to 1376 of Annual Report for 1934 and page 1875 of Annual Report for 1938 for Puyallup Waterway; and page 1702 of Annual Report for 1944, and page 1502 of Annual Report for 1954 for Blair (formerly Wapato and Port Industrial) Waterway. Existing project. Provides for: (a) Channel in City Waterway 500 feet wide and 29 feet deep from deep water in Commencement Bay to 11th Street Bridge, 500 feet wide and 22 feet deep to 14th Street Bridge, and varying from 500 to 250 feet wide and 19 feet deep from 14th Street Bridge to end of this waterway, a total length of 8,500 feet; (b) channel in Hylebos Waterway 30 feet deep, 3.1 miles long, and 200 feet wide except where width is increased to 250 feet at the bend below East 11th Street, to 300 feet at Lincoln Avenue bend, and to 510 feet and 770 feet, respectively, at the channel widening above Lincoln Avenue and the turning basin at the head of the waterway; (c) construction of two training walls, each about 700 feet long at mouth of Puyallup River; and (d) channel in Blair Waterway 2.6 miles long, including a portion seaward of East 1 th Street 650 feet wide and 30 feet deep over southerly 350 feet, and 35 feet deep over northerly 300 feet; and remaining portion, 35 feet deep and 150 feet wide at East 11th Street, 600 feet wide between East 11th Street and Lincoln Avenue, and 300 feet wide between Lincoln Avenue and a 1,200-foot wide turning basin at head of waterway. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 11.8 feet. Extreme tidal range is about 20 feet. (See Table 38-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 99 privately owned piers and wharves, 12 of which handle general cargo, 14 handle petroleum products, 1 is a copper-handling dock, 5 handle wood chips or hogged fuel, 5 handle industrial chemicals and salt, 4 receive sand and gravel, and there is 1 ferry dock. The remainder of the privately owned facilities are used for various activities normal to a port of this size. In addition, the Port of Tacoma owns 27 wharves or terminals, including 1 industrial yard, and an industrial area. The Port of Tacoma is presently in an expansion program. Operations and results during fiscal year. A draft report was distributed for public and agency review in August 1981 recommending modification of the Federal navigation channel project boundary in City Waterway, due to a change in the economic character of the waterway. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was completed in December 1966. For further details, see Annual Report for 1967. 17. WESTHAVEN COVE SMALL BOAT BASIN (WESTPORT MARINA), WASH. Location. Westport Marina is located in southwestern Washington at the town of Westport, on the northern tip of Point Chehalis at the mouth of Grays Harbor. Point Chehalis is the southern spit which separates South Bay of Grays Harbor from the Pacific Ocean. The City of Westport is in Grays Harbor County, about 140 miles southwest of Seattle, Washington, and 100 miles north of Portland, Oregon. Existing project. The recently completed Federal portion of the project involved removal of a 350-foot breakwater, replacing it with an 865-foot extension, and adding a 200-foot spur breakwater along the southerly entrance, which would provide protection to a second entrance channel dredged to a depth of -16 feet mean lower low water (MLLW). The second entrance channel would relieve congestion at the existing entrance and would improve the flushing characteristics of the marina. The Federal portion also included dredging 130,000 cubic yards for an access channel and a turning basin. The project provides a net increase of 179 moorage spaces. Local interests would also construct a fish-handling and fishprocessing area adjacent to the proposed entrance channel. Dredged fill would provide about 5.5 acres for expansion of water-oriented commercial enterprises. The local portion would also include dredging estimated at 60,000 cubic yards in the commercial moorage area. The Federal Government would maintain the modified general navigation facilities. Local interests would maintain the berthing areas, floats, wharves, piers, and shoreside facilities. (See Table 38-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: None. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the new entrance, including breakwater and dredging, is complete. 18. WILLAPA RIVER AND HARBOR AND NASELLE RIVER, WASH. Location. Willapa Harbor consists of lower reaches of Willapa River and Bay, an inlet of Pacific Ocean about 30 38-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 miles north of mouth of Columbia River in Washington. Willapa River rises about 30 miles east of harbor, flows generally westerly, and empties into the bay. Naselle River enters the bay near its southerly end. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18504.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1910 on page 968; 1915 on page 2001; and 1938 on page 1861. Existing project. Provides for: (a) channel over bar at mouth of Willapa Bay, 26 feet deep and at least 500 feet wide; (b) channel 24 feet deep and 200 feet wide from deep water in Willapa Bay to foot of Ferry Street at South Bend, thence 300 feet ide to westerly end of narrows, thence 250 feet wide to forks of river at Raymond, including a cutoff channel 3,100 feet long at narrows and a closing dike at Mailboat Slough; (c) channel 24 feet deep and 150 feet wide up south fork to deep basin above Cram lumber mill, and up north fork to 12th Street, with a turning basin 250 feet wide, 350 feet long, and 24 feet deep at latter point; (d) channel 10 feet deep and 40 feet wide from deep water in Palix River to Bay Center dock, with widening at shoreward end to provide a small mooring basin; (e) mooring basin 15 feet deep, 340 feet wide, and 540 feet long adjacent to port wharf at Tokeland; (f) entrance channel at Nahcotta 10 feet deep and 200 feet wide, and mooring basin 10 feet deep, 500 feet wide, and 1,150 feet long, protected by a rubblemound breakwater about 1,500 feet long; and (g) removal of snags, piles, and other obstructions in navigable channel of Naselle River between Naselle and mouth. Project includes about 26 miles of channel from entrance through Willapa River forks, 2,800 feet of Palix River-Bay Center channel, and 9 miles of Naselle River upstream of U.S. Highway 101 Bridge. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 8.9 feet at Toke Point; 9.9 feet at Raymond; 8.9 feet at Bay Center; and 10.8 feet near Naselle. Extreme range is 18 feet at Toke Point; 19.3 feet at Raymond; 16 feet at Bay Center; and 18 feet near Naselle. (See Table 38-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with, except as noted in "Operations and results during fiscal year". Terminal facilities. There are 24 wharves on Willapa River and Harbor, including 5 in Willapa Bay, 4 in Bay Center, 12 in Raymond and South Bend, and 1 in Tokeland. Two of the wharves at Raymond and South Bend are suitable for use by ocean-going vessels; one of these is publicly owned and operated as a general cargo terminal, and one is located at a sawmill. The other wharves, including 3 that are publicly owned and operated, are used by shallow-draft vessels. These facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations ard results during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Condition surveys were made of various segments of the project. Local sponsor indicated inability to dredge Tokeland Boat Basin moorage area. This resulted in deferral of maintenance dredging of the boat basin access channel scheduled for FY 1983. Federal dredging is temporarily deferred until local sponsor is financially capable. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was completed in November 1958. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1959.) 19. PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS See Table 38-D. 20. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS See Table 38-E. 21. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (preauthorization). See Table 38-F. Aquatic plant control (Section 302, Public Law 89-298): Total costs for fiscal year were $439,505. Streambank erosion control evaluation and demonstration (Section 32, Public Law 93-251). Total costs for fiscal year were $138. Shoreline erosion control demonstration (Section 54, Public Law 93-251). Total costs for fiscal year were $17,076. Locks and Dams 22. LAKE WASHINGTON SHIP CANAL, WASH. Location. Entirely within City of Seattle and extends from Puget Sound through Shilshole Bay, Salmon Bay, Lake Union, Portage Bay, and Union Bay to deep water in Lake Washington. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18447.) Previous projects. For details see page 2003, Annual Report for 1915, and page 1880, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Provides for a double lock and fixed dam with gated spillway and necessary accessory works at the Narrows at entrance to Salmon Bay, about 1.25 miles from deep water in Puget Sound; for a channel 34 feet deep and 300 feet wide from Puget Sound to Burlington Northern Railway bridge, about 5,500 feet, with a passing basin 34 feet deep and log basin 8 feet deep at turn below railway bridge; then 34 feet deep and 150 feet to 200 feet wide to locks, about 900 feet; and a guide pier 600 feet long; for revetment of canal banks between locks and Lake Union and between Lakes Union and Washington; and for a channel 30 feet deep with a width of 100 feet from locks to Lake Union, 200 feet thence to Portage Cut, 100 feet through Portage Cut, and thence 200 feet wide through Union Bay to Lake Washington. Section included in project is about 10 miles long. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Extreme tidal range is 19.3 feet. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 11.3 feet, and between mean lower low water and extreme low water is 4.6 feet. Ordinary fluctuation in upper pool is about 22 inches; extreme fluctuation has been 3.6 feet. Principal features of double lock and dam (structures are at Seattle, Wash.) are set forth in Table 38-C. (See also Table 38-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 104 wharves and piers on Lake Washington Ship Canal and adjacent inland waters, including Salmon Bay, Lake Union, Portage Bay, and Lake Washington. Of these, 18 are publicly owned, 3 of which are privately operated. The other wharves include 61 used for building, outfitting, or repair of vessels, 6 for handling 38-8 SEATTLE, WASH., DISTRICT petroleum products, 38 for various industrial purposes, and 7 for mooring and servicing pleasure craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 36-The Port of Seattle, Washington - Revised 1975.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Code 710 Funds: Cost sharing agreements were finalized in 1976 for Commodore Park at Lake Washington Ship Canal and in 1980 for Fremont Park on the north side of the Fremont Canal. Construction for Commodore Park was completed in July 1978 and since then has earned numerous awards including Corps of Engineers' Honor Award for landscape architecture in 1979. The first phase of Fremont Park was completed in the spring of 1981. Maintenance, hired labor: Locks were operated and maintained all year. Maintenance, contract: A $517,210 contract for entryway development was 97 percent complete in September. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was completed in 1934. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1935.) Flood Control Local Protection 23. CLARK FORK RIVER, MISSOULA, MONT. Location. On Clark Fork at Missoula, in southwestern Montana, 190 miles above its mouth in Pend Oreille Lake, Idaho. (See Geological Survey quadrangles Missoula and Bonner, Mont.) Existing project. Construction of flood protective works to prevent flood damage at two locations within city limits of Missoula, consisting of a levee and floodgate structure at area 5, levee and floodwall at area 3, and levee extension at area 3 (See Table 38-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Code 713 Funds: Recreation cost sharing discussions with City of Missoula, begun in June 1980, were furthered by a city resolution to continue negotiations in May 1981. A letter report was initiated in July 1981. Work will be continued to finalize a recreation cost sharing contract during the next fiscal year. Condition at end of fiscal year. Area 5 levee was completed in January 1964, and stoplog structure in April 1965. Area 3 levee, floodwall, and levee extension were completed in June 1966. 24. FLATHEAD RIVER NEAR KALISPELL, MONT. Location. The project is located near Kalispell, Montana, on the right bank of the Flathead River. Existing project. The project authorized in 1977 provided for protection of the communities of Evergreen and Days Acres by construction of about 33,000 lineal feet of earth levee along a 9-mile lengthof river.A 700 cfs pumping station would be located on Spring Creek in the community of Days Acres to remove interior drainage during flooding. Design studies began in November 1978 and have reestablished the flood plain and updated hydrology. The project is no longer feasible based on updated study information. A small project (.� 1 mile of levee) with low level protection may be feasible; however, studies on the small project are discontinued until firm local sponsorship is received. Local cooperation. Flathead County has declined to continue local sponsorship until a flood control district is formed by those affected. Operations and results during fiscal year. A meeting with local citizens and officials was held in 1981 to update them on studies and assess local support for the project. Local citizens are considering the formation of a flood control district. Further Corps action is not expected until firm assurance is received from the local sponsor. Condition at end of fiscal year. Advance engineering and design planning has been discontinued. 25. OKANOGAN RIVER, OMAK, WASH. Location. The city of Omak is located generally between river miles 30 and 31 on the Okanogan River. This river, a southward-running tributary of the Columbia River, lies in Okanogan County in the north central portion of the State of Washington, and in Canada. The greater part of the city lies on the west bank of the river. Across the river, the east side is within the Colville Indian Reservation and was annexed to the city following an election in 1930. Existing project. Provides for construction of levee improvements, including 6,500 feet of levee on the east bank and about 7,700 feet of levee on the west bank. Included with the levees are about 240 feet of concrete retaining wall. Landscape and wildlife habitat restoration is an integral part of the work. The levees provide protection, with 3 feet of freeboard, for the urban area of Omak against a 100-year flood. (See Table 38-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: None. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of levees and landscape placement is complete. Landscape maintenance is complete. 26. OKANOGAN RIVER, OROVILLE, WASH. Location. The city of Oroville is located within Okanogan County in the north central portion of Washington State Oroville is 42 miles north of Omak, the major town in Okanogan County, and 4 miles south of the Canadian border. The city is bounded by Lake Osoyoos to the north, the Similkameen River (River Mile 4) to the west and south, and the Okanogan River (River Mile 77) to the east. The area surrounding Oroville consists of orchard land; apple farming, fruit processing, and wood processing are the main economic activities of the area. Existing project. A levee improvement plan which provides protection against a 100-year flood, with 3 feet of freeboard, consists of raising 6,900 feet of existing levee an average of 2 feet and provides 2,400 feet of new levee averaging 6 feet in height. (See Table 38-B for authorizing legislation.) 38-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. No new work started. Condition at end of fiscal year. Levee construction and landscape maintenance are complete. 27. PLACER CREEK, IDAHO Location. Placer Creek rises in the St. Joe Mountains of northern Idaho, flows northerly about 7.8 miles, and discharges into the South Fork of Coeur d'Alene River at the city of Wallace. Existing project. Provides for flood control by construction of a 3,700-foot-long concrete channel to confine Placer Creek flows through Wallace. A debris basin capable of storing 17,000 cubic yards of debris would be located upstream from the channel to prevent plugging of the channel. Estimated cost is $6,430,000 (October 1981), including $5,950,000 Federal funds and non-Federal costs of $480,000. (See Table 38-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Prior to construction, local interests acquired all necessary lands, easements, and rights-of-way for the construction of the project; agreed to hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works; agreed to maintain and operate all the works after completion of construction in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army; agreed to provide without cost to the United States, all relocations or modifications of streets, culverts, bridges, roads, buildings, sewers and other utilities and related facilities, and adjust all claims pertaining to water rights; and prevent encroachment on the rights-of-way of the improved channel and debris barrier that would reduce the flood-carrying capacity of the stream or interfere with operation and maintenance. The city of Wallace and Shoshone County are sponsoring the project. Operations and results during fiscal year. Efforts included completion of plans and specifications, advertising and award of contract, and construction start on the debris basin. Local sponsors acquired all lands for the project and made necessary relocations to allow debris basin construction. Condition at end of fiscal year. Excavation of the debris basin was essentially complete. Contractor plans to complete the debris basin before winter shutdown. 28. SKAGIT RIVER, WASH., (LEVEE AND CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS) Location. On Skagit River in Skagit County, Washington, downstream from Burlington and Mount Vernon about 17 miles to tidewater. Existing project. Provides for raising and strengthening existing levees and minor channel improvements reaching from the mouths of the north and south forks of Skagit River to about 17 miles upstream, all as authorized in 1966. Reformulation of the authorized project resulted from detailed review of the authorized plan, reexamination of the flood problem, consideration of alternatives, and extensive coordination. Technical data re developed through field investigations, topographic mapping, hydrologic and hydraulic studies, evaluation of flood damages, appraisals of property values within and adjacent to the flood plain, foundation and materials exploration, inventory of environmental base conditions, assessment of impacts, fish and wildlife studies, recreation studies, and detailed design investigations. Total cost of the revised program was estimated to be $55,000,000, with $13,750,000 being non- Federal costs, as estimated under President Carter's proposed cost-sharing policies. (See Table 38-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests were to provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; hold the United States free from damages; maintain and operate the project after completion; relocate buildings and utilities, roads, sewers, related and special facilities as necessary; and prevent encroachment on the improved channels. Operations and results during fiscal year. On 6 November 1979 citizens of Skagit County voted on Proposition 2 which would have granted the Skagit County Commissioners authority to indebt Skagit County in an amount not to exceed $14,150,000 for the purpose of constructing flood control facilities. The vote was 71.9 percent against granting this authority. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project has been placed in "inactive" category. 29. STILLAGUAMISH RIVER, WASH. Location. Formed by confluence of its north and south forks at Arlington, in northwestern Washington, Stillaguamish River flows westerly 22 miles to Puget Sound, entering Port Susan through Hat Slough and South Pass, and Skagit Bay through West Pass. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18441, and Geological Survey quadrangles Stanwood, Marysville, and Stillaguamish, Wash.) Existing project. Works to reduce bank erosion and channel changes on Stillaguamish River 15 miles between Arlington and head of Hat Slough, and on Cook Slough, 3 miles long, as follows: Revetment at 26 places on river and Cook Slough; concrete weir 275 feet long between steel-sheet-pile piers at head of Cook Slough to limit flow through slough; and two cutoff channels, each about 900 feet long, to eliminate sharp bends in Cook Slough. Tidal influence extends about 3 miles into improved section. Flood stages of 16 feet above low water at Cook Slough weir have been observed. (See Table 38-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Removed brush and trees on approximately 30,000 linear feet of revetment, and repaired two areas of the revetments with riprap. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was completed in July 1939. (For further details see Annual Report for 1940.) 30. TACOMA, PUYALLUP RIVER, WASH. Location. Puyallup River has its source in glaciers on western slopes of Mount Rainier, Wash., flows northwesterly 50 miles, and empties into Commencement Bay, an arm of 38-10 SEATTLE, WASH., DISTRICT Puget Sound, at Tacoma. Work covered by this project is on Puyallup River, within city limits of Tacoma. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18453.) Existing project. A channel with a capacity of 50,000 cubic feet per second between East 11th Street Bridge and lower end of inter-county improvement, a distance of about 2.2 miles, by straightening channel, building levees, revetting channel and levees, and making necessary bridge changes. The 11th Street Bridge at lower end of project is 0.75 mile above mouth of Puyallup River. Diurnal tidal range at mouth of river is 11.8 feet and extreme range is 20 feet. Improvement was planned in conjunction with Mud Mountain Dam and affords protection against floods about 50 percent greater than maximum discharge of record. (See Table 38-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Project boundary surveyed and monumented. Code 713 funds: Local cost sharing possibilities are being reviewed. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was completed in May 1950. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1950.) 31. WILLAPA RIVER AT RAYMOND, WASH. Location. Willapa River rises in the Willapa Hills, in the southwestern part of the State of Washington, and flows in a general northwesterly direction for about 37 miles to Willapa Bay, an inlet of the Pacific Ocean about 30 miles north of the mouth of the Columbia River. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 6185.) Existing project. The plan of improvement provides for a levee system at Raymond to protect municipal areas from tidal waters. The lower end of the protected area is 10 miles above the mouth of the Willapa River. The diurnal tidal range at Raymond is 9.9 feet and the extreme range is 19.3 feet. The project was authorized in 1944, but was placed in a deferred status because the city of Raymond (local sponsor) was unable to provide required items of local cooperation. A restudy of the project was requested by the Raymond City Commission in October 1970 and was completed in September 1975. Based upon the 1975 restudy, the estimated cost for construction is $2,985,000 (October 1980), including $2,730,000 Federal funds and non-Federal costs of $255,000. (See Table 38-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. The city of Raymond has withdrawn its support because of inability to provide local cooperation requirements. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preparation of a combined Phase I and II General Design Memorandum (GDM)/Environmental Assessment (EA) was discontinued because the local sponsor withdrew support. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project has been placed in an "inactive" status. 32. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS and agencies responsible for their operation and maintenance are advised of any needed repairs. During the fiscal year, inspections were made on the Yakima and Okanogan Rivers in Washington. Fiscal year costs were $33,602. Costs to date have been $334,779. 33. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See Table 38-G. 34. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION See Table 38-H. Reservoirs 35. HOWARD A. HANSON DAM, WASH. Location. Green River, in northwestern Washington, flows westerly for 40 miles to Auburn, thence northerly 32 miles to its mouth in Elliott Bay at Seattle. Dam is at river mile 64, 6 miles southeast of Kanaskat, and 1 mile downstream from mouth of North Fork. (See Geological Survey topographic sheet, "Cedar Lake quadrangle, Wash.") Existing project. Rockfill dam about 235 feet high, with gated spillway having a concrete weir at elevation 1176 feet above mean sea level and top of gates at elevation 1206, creating a reservoir with capacity of 106,000 acre-feet. Dam along crest is about 675 feet long. Improvement is designed to control flooding in Green River Valley to alleviate agricultural and urban flood damage, and make possible further expansion of Seattle industrial area. Also, supplements Tacoma water supply which was included as a betterment. (See Table 38-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Contributed funds expended, $2,000,000. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Operation continued all year. Routine maintenance was accomplished on roads, gages, debris booms, turbidimeter, ditches, powerline, and other project features. The outlet works stilling basin was inspected and repaired. Work continued on water quality surveys, water storage studies, and channel capacity study. Maintenance, contract: Settlement of the fill for the relocated Burlington Northern Railway between stations 10989 and 10991 was under continued surveillance. The deferred construction period has been extended to cover this area to observe effect of remedial work. (Improvements to the drainage system have apparently stabilized the railroad fill.) A $33,656 roofing contract was completed during the year. Inspections are made of Federally constructed local flood Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was completed in protection projects which are maintained by local interests; June 1963. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1966.) 38-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 36. MUD MOUNTAIN DAM, WASH. Location. On White River, principal tributary of Puyallup River, near Mud Mountain, 28 miles above its confluence with Puyallup River, and 38 miles above mouth of Puyallup River. Dam is 6 miles southeast of Enumclaw, in northwestern Washington, and 38 miles east of Tacoma. (See Geological Survey topographic sheet "Cedar Lake quadrangle, Washington.") Existing project. Rockfill dam, 700 feet long at crest elevation, rises 425 feet above bedrock. Reservoir has storage capacity of about 106,000 acre-feet. Outlet works are in right abutment and permit controlled discharge of 17,700 cubic feet per second through two concrete-lined tunnels with uncontrolled discharge over spillway having maximum capacity of 139,000 cubic feet per second. Improvement affords flood protection to White and Puyallup River Valleys and protects Tacoma industrial district in conjunction with Puyallup River project at Tacoma against floods about 50 percent greater than maximum discharge of record. (See Table 38-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Project features were operated all year. Maintenance was accomplished on dam facilities, 9-foot regulating outlet tunnel, intake structure, gages, debris booms, power lines, roads, ditches, and fish facilities. Tank trucks hauled 1,094 fish past the dam. Maintenance, contract: A $308,000 water treatment contract was 85 percent completed at the end of the fiscal year. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was completed in June 1953, except for recreation facilities. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1953.) The Corps has constructed two vistas, a picnic area, and playground adjacent to the project office, a reservoir access point for hunters and fishermen, and a 1,760-foot trail leading to the lower vista area. 37. WYNOOCHEE LAKE, WASH. Location. On Wynoochee River, a tributary of Chehalis River, about 28 miles north of Montesano, Grays Harbor County, Wash. (See Geological Survey quadrangles, Grisdale, Wynoochee Valley, and Montesano.) Existing project. Provides for a concrete and earthfill dam, 177 feet high, and reservoir of 70,000 acre-feet of total storage for water supply, flood control, irrigation, and fish and wildlife. Installation of power-generating facilities was not authorized, pending a re-examination report by the Chief of Engineers. In February 1966, the Federal Power Commission asserted that power production as part of the Wynoochee project was not feasible at that time. Estimated cost of the project (September 1979) is $23,392,245. (See Table 38-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must repay all costs allocated to water supply, in accordance with the Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended. A water supply contract was signed in August 1967. Repayment estimate is $17,900,000. This reimbursable cost is divided into three increments corresponding to three increments of storage allocated to water supply, each of which must be paid, with interest, within 50 years of the first use of that increment of storage. The first increment, $10,400,000, is considered non-deferrable, with annual payments beginning in January 1973. A Congressional authorized amendment permitted deferral of the major portion of the first 10 years payments. Local interests must also repay such costs allocated to irrigation as are later determined to be repayable under Federal reclamation law and hold the United States free from damages for water-rights claims resulting from construction and operation of the project. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance, contract: A $214,547 fire protection system contract was 95 percent complete at the end of the fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Project facilities were operated all year. Maintenance was accomplished on dam and fish facilities, roads, ditches, culverts, and visitors' facilities. A tank truck hauled 1,803 fish past the dam. Condition at end of fiscal year. Upstream fish facilities were operational in the fall of 1970, and the project was operational 16 December 1972. 38. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS Flood control storage space was available in Hungry Horse Reservoir, Montana, Flathead Lake, Montana (controlled by Kerr Dam), Grand Coulee Project, Washington, and Ross Reservoir, Washington. Guidance forecasts were made during the flood control season, as required. Storage for replacement of lost valley storage and an additional flood control allocation of 58,000 feet at Upper Baker, in Washington, was provided in accordance with rule curves and flood forecasts. No lost valley storage replacement was requested at Rocky Reach, Priest Rapids, and Wells Dams. Daily and/or hourly data were collected and tabulated as required to check compliance with operating criteria. Coordination necessary in preparation or revision of reservoir regulation manuals was carried on during the year with agencies responsible for the operation of these projects. Fiscal year costs were $71,960. Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 39. ALBENI FALLS DAM, IDAHO Location. Dam is on Pend Oreille River about 25 miles west of Sandpoint, in northern Idaho, and 50 miles northeast of Spokane, Wash. Dam is 838 and 90 miles upstream from mouths of Columbia and Pend Oreille Rivers, respectively. (See Geological Survey topographic sheets, Sandpoint, Idaho, and Newport, Wash.) Existing project. Provides flood control, hydroelectric power, and related water uses on Pend Oreille River as a part of the multiple-purpose plan for development of Columbia River Basin, including recreation development. At the dam, channel was formerly divided by an island and a low waterfall of about 7 feet. Dam is a gated, gravity-structure spillway in left channel and a powerhouse having an installation of 42,600 kilowatts in right channel, creating a reservoir with a usable storage capacity of 1,153,000 acre-feet. (See Table 38-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Regular funds: Maintenance, hired labor: Reservoir was operated 38-12 SEATTLE, WASH., DISTRICT through its annual cycle of storage and release. Routine structural, mechanical, and electrical maintenance was performed on spillway, dam, powerhouse, and equipment. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was completed in June 1957. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1957.) Recreation facilities for public use have been provided at Albeni Cove, Priest River, Riley Creek, Johnson Creek, Trestle Creek, Strongs Island, and Springy Point. (Refer to Albeni Falls Master Plan dated June 1981 for further planned development.) 40. CHIEF JOSEPH DAM, RUFUS WOODS LAKE, WASH. Location. On Columbia River in north central Washington, at river mile 545, just upstream from mouth of Foster Creek, 1.5 miles upstream from Town of Bridgeport. (Geological Survey topographic sheet Okanogan, Wash., shows general locality.) Existing project. A concrete gravity structure which consists of a 19-gate spillway and a 27-unit powerhouse. The powerhouse has sixteen 64,000 kilowatt and eleven 95,000 kilowatt generators with nameplate capacity of 2,069,000 kilowatts. Pool raising completed in 1981 increased the powerplant capability to 2,450,000 kilowatts. Modifications to rehabilitate and uprate the existing Units 1 through 16 will be completed in 1986. Estimated cost of current construction project is $360,000,000 (full funding). (See Table 38-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Regular funds: New work, hired labor: Completed design memos on wildlife mitigation; maintenance, storage, and administrative facilities; and visitor center facilities. New work, contract: Completed construction on structural modification to dam; Douglas County Road relocation; powerhouse extension; and pool raise from 946.0 feet to 956.0 feet. Continued construction of ancestral burial relocations, cultural resources relocation, as well as real estate acquisition. New contracts started and completed included wildlife mitigation: goose islands and fencing (Phase I); upstream right bank riprap; Bridgeport State Park "Quick Fix"; and land restoration. New contracts started and continuing included wildlife mitigation: raptor poles, fencing (Phase II), and plant propagation. Plans and specifications were completed for wildlife mitigation, irrigation, and spillway modifications. Maintenance, hired labor: Project was operated all year, and routine maintenance work was performed. Maintenance, contract: Contracts were completed for replacement of the bus gallery roof and for replacement of wornout generator air coolers. A contract was awarded to replace the stator winding in main generator #5. This unit should be returned to service in December 1981. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project providing initial 16 power units was completed in Fiscal Year 1961. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1962.) Generator units 17 through 27 are completed and producing power. Construction of dam structural modification and the powerhouse and installation of additional units is approximately 99 percent complete. 41. LIBBY DAMLAKE KOOCANUSA, MONT. Location. On Kootenai River in Lincoln County, Mont., about 17 miles upstream from Libby, and 219 miles upstream from confluence of Kootenai with Columbia River. (See Geological Survey topographic sheet, Thompson Lakes, Mont.) Existing project. Provides storage for local flood control protection in Montana and Idaho, and main stem flood control in Lower Columbia River, hydroelectric power generation at-site and at downstream plants through storage release. Project will be operated as a unit of comprehensive system for improvement of Columbia River Basin for flood control, navigation, hydroelectric power, and other purposes. Libby Dam -Lake Koocanusa Project. Dam is a straight concrete gravity overflow type, 420 feet high, 3,055 feet long, with normal full pool at elevation 2459 feet above mean sea level. Powerhouse has an initial installed capacity of 420,000 kilowatts from four hydroelectric generating units with provision for four additional units which are currently under construction. Lake Koocanusa is 90 miles long, backing water 42 miles into Canada and has a usable storage capacity of 4,965,000 acre-feet at 50 percent drawdown. Construction of dam was in accordance with treaty between United States and Canada relating to international cooperation in waterresource development of the Columbia River Basin. Project features include: Relocation of 52 miles of Montana State Highway; 60 miles of Burlington Northern Railroad, including a seven-mile tunnel; 50 miles of Forest Development roads, including a 2,400-foot long steel truss bridge; construction of a selective withdrawal structure to control temperature and oxygen conditions of water released past the dam; a visitor center with an exhibit program developed and operated by the Montana Historical Society; school facilities for education of dependents of construction personnel; participation in airport facilities at Kelley Flats, Montana; use of $4,000,000 project funds for fish production measures; acquisition and conveyance to the State of Montana not more than 12,000 acres of land, at cost not to exceed $2,000,000, for the prevention of wildlife grazing losses caused by the project; relocating Deep Creek Bridge, Boundary County, Idaho; compensating drainage districts and owners of leveed and unleveed tracts in Kootenai Flats, Boundary County, Idaho, for modification of pumping facilities, crops and other damages caused by duration of higher flows during drawdown operation of Libby Dam; constructing central sewage collection and treatment facilities as part of the relocation of municipal facilities of Rexford, Montana; and 7 campground recreation facilities. Recreation development beyond the initial 7 sites will be by the U.S. Forest Service. Cost estimate for the new work (4 units) is $489,000,000 (full funding) Corps of Engineers funds; $185,349 Federal Aviation Agency funds; U.S. Forest Service, $960,000; and $17,500 contributed funds for Kelley Flats airport facility. (See Table 38-B for authorizing legislation.) Libby Additional Units and Reregulating Dam Project. Provides for installation of 4 additional units at the Libby Dam Powerhouse, construction of a reregulating dam about 10 miles downstream of Libby Dam, and associated relocation of about 9 miles of Burlington Northern Railroad, 7.5 miles of St. Regis log haul road, 0.5 miles of Forest Development Road, and 7.5 miles of Montana State Highway. Estimated Federal cost is $962,000,000 (full funding). Funds were provided for a 38-13 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 construction start in 1977. (See Table 38-B for authorizing legislation.) Libby Reregulating Dam - Power Units Project. Provides for installation of three hydroelectric generating units at the reregulating dam with 78,900 kilowatt installed capacity. Cost to install the three units is estimated at $69,000,000 (October 1981). (See Table 38-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with (participation in construction of airport facility at Kelley Flats, Montana). Contributed funds expended $15,910. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work, hired labor: Design efforts were completed on project administration complex, dispersed recreation, visitors orientation area - left bank, and miscellaneous smaller items. Design efforts were continued on powerhouse circuit breaker barriers. New work, contract: Construction was completed on Rexford Bench Campground, water supply system; landscape restoration MSH 37; and Peck Gulch and Yarnell Islands Campgrounds. Deleted work: Total project scope has been modified to permit completion of Construction General funding at the end of FY 1982. Deletions from the project include project administration complex, dispersed recreation, visitor information service, and visitor orientation area - left bank. On the Libby Additional Units and Reregulating Dam Project, work continued on installation of turbines and fabrication of generators for Units 5 through 8. Manufacture of auxiliary electrical equipmentwas initiated. All construction work on the reregulating dam has been halted due to court injunction. Regular Funds: Maintenance, hired labor: Reservoir was operated through its annual cycle of storage and release. Routine structural, mechanical, and electrical maintenance was performed on spillway, dam powerhouse, and equipment. Condition at end of fiscal year. Libby Dam - Lake Koocanusa Project: Planning and design is 99percent complete with remaining work consisting of: continued meetings with Canada for water quality protection; completion of low water boat ramps; cultural resources survey and hydrology and reservoir operations. Completed construction work includes: relocation of 60 miles of Burlington Northern Railroad, Forest Service Ranger Station at Canoe Gulch, Forest Service work center at Eureka, cemetery and grave relocations, airport facilities at Kelley Flats, school facilitiesto assistlocal communities in meetingtheir needs for additional classrooms, reservoir clearing, relocation of town of Rexford municipal facilities, and 50 miles of Forest Development Road. Relocation of 52 miles of Montana State Highway is essentially complete with highway open to public travel since November 1974. Powerhouse and miscellaneous structures contract, including installation of power generation equipment, is complete. The project as a whole is about 98 percent complete. Canada has completed all reservoir clearing work in their portion of Lake Koocanusa, including relocation of railroads and roads. Libby Additional Units and Reregulating Dam Project. Planning and design on the Reregulating Dam has been depf-red pending authorization. Remaining design work consists of completion of plans and specifications on MSH 37 and Forest Development Road relocation, Reregulating Dam. Preparation of plans and specifications was completed on auxiliary equipment for Units 5 through 8 at the main Libby Dam. Three auxiliary equipment contracts remain to be awarded. Equipment installation plans and specifications are underway. Libby Reregulating Dam - Power Units Project. A General Design Memorandum 1, Phase II, Preliminary Design Report was approved by the Office, Chief of Engineers on 3 March 1981. 42. OTHER AUTHORIZED MULTIPLE-PURPOSE PROJECTS, INCLUDING POWER See Table 38-I. General Investigations 43. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs were $3,008,787, of which $529,503 was for flood control studies, $1,724,740 was for navigation studies, $80,175 was for special studies, $693,589 was for comprehensive basin studies, and $19,220 was for preauthorization studies. 44. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA The work programmed for collection and study of basic data covers international water studies, flood plain management services, and hydrologic studies. Work on international water studies included checking Kootenay Lake storage computations to determine compliance of West Kootenay Power & Light Co. with orders of International Joint Commission, and coordination with International Kootenay Lake, Osoyoos Lake, and Skagit River Boards of Control in enforcement of International Joint Commission orders. Completed flood plain information report on Chehalis River, Aberdeen to Satsop and vicinity in Washington. Technical assistance was provided other Federal and non-Federal agencies in flood hazard evaluation and related services as requested. Fiscal year costs were $2,906 for international water studies, $282,617 for flood plain management services, $7,120 for hydrologic studies, and $687,302 for inspection of dams; a total of $979,945. 45. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT No program for FY 81. 38-14 SEATTLE, WASH., DISTRICT TABLE 38-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to In Text Project Funding FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 Sep. 30, 1981 1. Anacortes Harbor, Wash. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 2. Bellingham Harbor, Wash. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 3. Bellingham, Squalicum Small Boat Harbor, Wash. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 4. East Bay Marina, Olympia Harbor, Wash. 5. Ediz Hook, Wash. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 6. Everett Harbor and Snohomish River, Wash. (Federal Funds) New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost - 222,345 - 222,345 19,932 20,078 - 19,875 140,000 - 19,875 104,113 57,500 95,000 382,300 57,322 89,213 384,579 587,761 551,874 59,523 59,523 5,000 5,000 - 1,566,840 - 1,566,8401 - 1,042,075 1,953 1,040,1412 3 - - - - 31,581 - - - - 31,581' - - - - 9,103 - - - - 9,103 662,000 717,000 189,000 -83,982 1,703,2355 675,974 708,768 200,173 -83,915 1,703,2355 - 550,000 1,076,000 - 510,000 848,120 - 1,626,000 267,880 1,626,000 69,000 89,000 10,000 175,000 62,912 104,541 14,562 162,464 2,973,000 -258,000 2,708,291 -475 - 38,104 - 38,104 246,000 150,000 225,069 166,326 8,977 25,000 25,000 24, 22, - 4, 483,9766 471,3666 - 5,876,880 - 5,876,880 000 87,104 588 85,6922 - 396,000 605 396,000 - 5,700 415,250 320,000 900,000 399,012 164,515 1,071,683 5,700 - 1,775,744 - 1,775,7447 54,000 4,943,652 52,654 4,942,15528 38-15 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 38-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (continued) See Section Total Cost to In Text Project Funding FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 Sep. 30, 1981 (Contrib. Funds) New Work 7. Friday Harbor Marina Wash. 8. Grays Harbor and Chehalis River, Wash. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 9. Kenmore Navigation Channel, Wash. 10. Lake Crockett, Wash. 11. Neah Bay, Wash. 12. Puget Sound and its Tributary Waters, Wash. 13. Quillayute River, Wash. (Federal Funds) Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Minor Rehab. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost - - - - 5,618 - - - - 5,618 - - 441,000 - 457,000 - - 441,000 - 457,000 - 100,000 110,000 55,000 308,0379 - 95,175 114,810 52,700 305,7229 3,000 -3,000 2,000 60,000 5,092,851 - - 1,249 60,259 5,092,35910 4,714,400 3,700,648 2,660,000 3,972,800 59,228,464 5,328,410 3,718,042 2,661,536 3,946,277 59,193,29111 - - - - 120,592 - - - - 120,592 - - - - 4,606,145 - - - - 4,606,145 - - - - 35,834 - - - - 35,834 - - - - 47,889 - - - - 47,889 94,000 41,000 74,000 732,000 946,00012 57,873 76,232 69,365 736,250 944,71912 10,000 - 22,000 - 352,24013 34,534 333 26,657 - 352,2401s 9,476 6,691 41,858 138,000 574,465 9,500 6,691 37,852 140,955 573,4142 - - - - 2,057,266 - - - - 2,057,266 52,700 540,000 1,090,000 -116,000 1,834,466 52,511 507,943 1,122,245 -116,088 1,834,377 - - - - 43,337 - - - - 43,337 805,169 880,000 1,168,500 1,160,800 13,135,302 794,396 891,983 1,162,637 1,168,840 13,132,31814 - - - - 521,850 - - - - 521,85015 525,000 1,010,000 150,000 370,000 5,364,760 524,171 1,014,558 151.429 369.427 5,363,802 38-16 SEATTLE, WASH., DISTRICT TABLE 38-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (continued) See Section Total Cost to In Text Project Funding FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 Sep. 30, 1981 (Contrib. Funds) New Work 14. Seattle Harbor, Wash. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 15. Swinomish Channel, Wash. 16. Tacoma Harbor, Wash. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 17. Westhaven Cove Small Boat Basin, Wash. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 18. Willapa River and Harbor and Naselle River, Wash. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 22. Lake Washington Ship Canal, Wash. 23. Clark Fork River, Missoula, Mont. (Federal Funds) Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 401,500 30,000 325,000 401,276 27,880 327,356 250,000 120,000 70,000 232,872 145,853 72,376 5,250 28,054 78,633 6,558 28,168 78,583 35,000 1,615,000 211,000 45,273 1,616,162 202,865 - 600,000 625,000 - 500,000 724,330 94,800 162,000 73,706 208,711 307,000 -313,000 59,000 7,538 -18 58,502 2,521,000 4,316,000 3,499,600 2,651,154 4,436,293 3,183,942 -- 20,000 - 20,000 - 170,335 - 170,335 378,000 4,831,716 377,121 4,830,8372 - 69,333 - 69,333 - 808,332 - 808,33216 276,500 4,963,243 265,245 4,951,988 - 2,435,500 - 2,435,500'" - 1,386,335 -1,311 1,384,97418 - 559,581 - 559,581's - 2,000,000 9,000 2,000,000 26,000 1,251,000 26,670 1,251,000 - 1,579,269 - 1,579,269 2 77,000 12,405,978 73,863 12,402,841 21 - 78,372 - 78,372 n - 4,811,49723 472 4,811,47124 2,938,000 45,086,230 3,429,332 45,073,49226 7,000 384,012 6,999 384,011 38-17 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 38-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (continued) See Section Total Cost to In Text Project Funding FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 Sep. 30, 1981 (Contrib. Funds) New Work 24. Flathead River near Kalispell, Mont. 25. Okanogan River, Omak, Wash. 26. Okanogan River, Oroville, Wash. 27. Placer Creek, Idaho 28. Skagit River, Wash. (Levee and Channel Improvements) 29. Stillaguamish River, Wash. 30. Tacoma, Puyallup River, Wash. 31. Willapa River at Raymond, Wash. 35. Howard A. Hanson Dam, Wash. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 36. Mud Mountain Dam, Wash. 37. Wynoochee Lake, Wash. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Minor Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. - 150,000 80,000 - 145,439 83,978 1,420,000 300,000 265,000 1,007,273 606,923 385,048 105,000 975,000 490,000 117,098 858,302 601,845 - 280,000 375,000 - 270,227 384,471 802,084 900,000 128,000 786,703 899,824 143,363 46,300 21,000 48,231 20,752 85,000 72,008 9,700 39,000 9,600 9,745 36,376 12,731 - 162,500 250,000 - 118,594 293,906 519,000 565,000 369,000 539,607 584,187 400,360 854,000 875,000 837,500 793,594 927,016 861,114 60,000 42,200 - - 13,500 - 13,500 70,000 300,000 70,583 300,000 5,000 2,230,00027 9,730 2,230,00027 105,000 1,774,500 117,650 1,773,831" 750,000 1,405,000 732,345 1,387,043 - 1,934,792 4,148 1,933,052 - 220,594 - 220,594 32,000 918,845 37,257 909,940 4,000 3,947,853 730 3,944,583" 32,000 287,597 29,593 285,190 63,000 508,13030 59,414 504,544 s� - 37,048,061 - 37,048,061 588,000 6,565,251 588,848 6,563,873 - 2,000,000 - 2,000,000 - 13,295,84881 - 13,295,848'8 1,162,000 10,890,372 1,163,507 10,876,647 - 285,908 - 285,908 - 23,494,44532 38-18 SEATTLE, WASH., DISTRICT TABLE 38-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (continued) See Section Total Cost to In Text Project Funding FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 Sep. 30, 1981 Cost 7,161 95,292 - 1 23,494,445" Maint. Approp. 730,000 1,241,700 974,881 1,013,000 6,036,069 Cost 726,127 1,221,468 877,626 1,158,860 6,024,480 39. Albeni Falls Dam, New Work Idaho Approp. 50,000 -200 - - 31,878,297" Cost 50,089 15,990 16 - 31,878,297 " Maint. Approp. 1,507,200 1,470,800 1,351,000 1,408,000 17,648,256 " Cost 1,537,054 1,495,453 1,372,010 1,391,276 17,617,466 " 40. Chief Joseph Dam- New Work Rufus Woods Lake, Approp. 53,811,000 26,980,000 16,597,000 20,858,000 442,808,235 u Wash. Cost 55,138,525 27,153,982 15,835,523 21,556,256 442,533,350 " Maint. Approp. 2,768,000 3,779,500 3,743,200 4,551,800 44,744,935 Cost 2,673,739 3,904,552 3,669,785 4,648,742 44,711,387 Major Rehab. Approp. - - - - 297,630 Cost - - - - 297,630 41. Libby Dam, Lake New Work Koocanusa, Mont. Approp. 16,760,000 20,403,800 14,123,000 8,913,000 524,011,14087 (Federal Funds) Cost 15,883,188 21,483,655 13,154,883 9,959,243 523,984,441" Maint. Approp. 1,670,000 1,693,000 2,005,000 2,180,000 11,482,079 Cost 1,645,936 1,708,685 2,033,236 2,168,699 11,456,273 (Contrib. Funds) New Work Contrib. - - - - 17,500 Cost - - - - 15,910" 1. Includes $56,582 for previous projects. Excludes $13,000 Coast Guard funds 22. Includes $6,597 for previous project. expended. 23. Includes $787,200 for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710). 2. Includes applicable portion of Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys appro- 24. Includes $485,002 for previous projects. priations and costs. 25. Includes $787,174 for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710). 3. Includes $1,092 for previous project. 26. Includes $1,631,195 expended between 1916 and 1936 on operation and care 4. Excludes $2,157,473 expended by Port of Bellingham in fulfilling require- of works of improvement, under provisions of the permanent indefinite ments of local cooperation. appropriation for such purposes. 5. Includes $131,075 preauthorization cost. 27. Includes $125,000 preauthorization cost. 6. Includes $330,517 preauthorization cost. 28. Includes $160,700 preauthorization cost. 7. Includes $418,209 for previous projects. Excludes $43,000 Coast Guard funds 29. Includes $1,035 for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710). expended. 30. Includes $32,630 preconstruction planning costs. 8. Includes $5,869 for previous projects. 31. Includes $87,785 for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710). 9. Includes $43,037 for previous project and $235,341 preauthorization cost. 32. Includes $102,200 for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710). 10. Includes $1,249 for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710). 33. Includes $136,736 for Public Works Acceleration Act and $971,947 for Includes $113,134 for previous projects. Excludes $162,000 Navy funds and recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710). $6,000 Coast Guard funds expended. 34. Includes $108,700 Special Recreation Use Fees. 11. Includes $37,415 for previous projects. 35. Includes $298,264,000 for 11 additional generator units, $58,000 for Public 12. Includes $148,765 preauthorization cost. Works Acceleration Act, and $147,983 for recreation facilities at completed 13. Includes $92,000 for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710). project (Code 710). 14. Includes $67,496 for previous project. 36. Includes $297,989,115 for 11 additional generator units, $58,000 for Public 15. ExcludesNavyfundsexpendedondredgingriverchannelin 1944; andCoast Works Acceleration Act, and $147,983 for recreation facilities at completed Guard funds expended for channel dredging in 1948 and 1949. project (Code 710). 16. Excludes $1,000 Coast Guard funds expended. 37. Includes $26,396,634 for additional units, $16,276,363 for reregulatingdam, 17. Includes $159,584 for previous projects, and $475,000 for power planning. 18. Includes $5,347 for previous projects. 38. Includes $23,383,901 for additional units, $16,276,363 for reregulating dam, 19. Includes $62,697 value in work contributed by Port of Tacoma. and $475,000 for power planning. 20. Includes$228,084 forpreviousprojects. Excludes$40,000CoastGuardfunds 39. Excludes$185,349Federal Aviation Agency funds forconstructionofKelley expended. Flats airport facility. 21. Includes $309,177 for previous projects. 38-19 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 38-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 2, 1919 Sept. 3, 1954 June 25, 1910 July 3, 1930 Aug. 26, 1937 Sept. 3, 1954 July 3, 1958 July 14, 1960 as amended July 14, 1960 as amended Mar. 7, 1974 June 25, 1910 July 3, 1930 June 20, 1938 Sept. 3, 1954 July 14, 1960 Aug. 13, 1968 ANACORTES HARBOR, WASH. (See Section 1 of Text) Channel in Capsante Waterway. Mooring basin. BELLINGHAM HARBOR, WASH. (See Section 2 of Text) Whatcom Creek Waterway 26- and 18-foot channels. Entrance channel in Squalicum Creek Waterway. Maintenance of southerly half and westerly end of Squalicum Creek Basin. Small-boat basin adjacent to Squalicum Creek Waterway. Whatcom Creek Waterway, 30-foot channel. BELLINGHAM, SQUALICUM SMALL BOAT HARBOR, WASH. (See Section 3 of Text) Construction of 1500 feet of breakwater, dredging of the entrance and access channels and turning basin. EAST BAY MARINA, OLYMPIA HARBOR, WASH. (See Section 4 of Text) Construction of 700 feet of concrete floating breakwater and dredging of the entrance and access channels and turning basin. EDIZ HOOK, WASH. (See Section 5 of Text) Construction of 10,000 lineal feet of rock revetment, together with initial beach replenishment and annual nourishment. Emergency interim measures necessary to prevent breaching of Ediz Hook prior to construction of authorized project. EVERETT HARBOR AND SNOHOMISH RIVER, WASH. (See Section 6 of Text) Training dike 10,500 feet long extending across bar at outlet of old river channel. Raise 6,000 feet of training dike, extend spur dike, widen gap in dike as required, maintain East Waterway and channel to gap. Abandon project for Snohomish River and provide settling basin near 14th Street. Spur dike at Preston Point, remove training dike north of river outlet, enlarge channel to 14th Street, and deepen settling basin. Widen channel from settling basin to gap; extend channel to head of Steamboat Slough; and a settling basin within upper channel reach. Raise and extend existing training dike; and construct breakwater on westerly and southerly sides of 14th Street small-boat basin.s 38-20 H. Doc. 1117, 64th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 102, 83d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 1161, 60th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 187, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 70, 74th Cong., 1st Sess.1 H. Doc. 558, 82d Cong., 2d Sess. 2 S. Doc. 46, 85th Cong., 1st Sess. 3 Detailed Project Report in Office, Chief of Engineers4 Sec. 107, P.L. 86-645 Detailed Project Report in Office Chief of Engineers Sec. 107, P.L. 86-645 H. Doc. 93-101, 93rd Cong., 1st Sess., P.L. 93-251 H. Doc. 1108, 60th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 377, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 546, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 569, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 348, 86th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 357, 90th Cong., 2d Sess. 5 SEATTLE, WASH., DISTRICT TABLE 38-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (continued) Acts Work Authorized Documents July 14, 1960 as amended June 3, 1896 Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 2, 1907 June 25, 1910 June 25, 1910 Aug. 8, 1917 Jan. 21, 1927 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended Mar. 2, 1945 June 30, 1948 Sept. 3, 1954 Sept. 3, 1954 July 14, 1960 as amended March 2, 1945 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended FRIDAY HARBOR MARINA, WASH. (See Section 7 of Text) Construction of 1600 feet of concrete floating breakwater. GRAYS HARBOR AND CHEHALIS RIVER, WASH. (See Section 8 of Text) South jetty. A north jetty 9,000 feet long. The 18-foot channel. Extend north jetty 7,000 feet; length of south jetty fixed at 13,734 feet. A 6-foot channel above Cosmopolis. Dredging in bar channel. Dredging in bar channel. 16-foot channel from Cosmopolis to Montesano. 7 Reconstruct north and south jetties to an elevation of 16 feet above mean lower low water. Maintain 26-foot channel below Aberdeen (as authorized by Public Works Administration Dec. 11, 1933) and combining projects for Grays Harbor and bar entrance and Grays Harbor, inner portion, and Chehalis River under a modified project for Grays Harbor and Chehalis River. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities Maintain 30-foot depth in channel from deep water in Grays Harbor to Port of Grays Harbor Commission terminal, which was deepened from 26 to 30 feet with Navy funds. 14-foot channel to Bay City; breakwater at Westhaven; protection of Point Chehalis; and maintenance of Westhaven entrance channel." Dredging and maintenance of a 30-foot channel and turning basin from Aberdeen to Cosmopolis. Additional breakwater, 1,400 feet long, at Westhaven Cove. KENMORE NAVIGATION CHANNEL, WASH. (See Section 9 of Text) Construction of navigation channel 15 feet deep consisting of a 100-foot wide inner channel 900 feet long, an 800-foot long transition channel with 24 � 30-foot bend and maximum width of 190 feet, and a 120-foot wide outer channel 1,200 feet long. LAKE CROCKETT, WASH. (See Section 10 of Text) Small-boat basin. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. 38-21 Detailed Project Report in Office, Chief of Engineers Sec. 107, P.L. 86-645 Annual Report, 1895, pp. 3517-3533 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 2, 59th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 507, 59th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 29, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 1125, 60th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 1729, 64th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 582, 69th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 315, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 2, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 53, 73d Cong., 1st Sess.; Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 2, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 Report in Office, Chief of Engineers H. Doc. 635, 80th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 412, 83d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 30, 84th Cong., 1st Sess.5 Detailed Project Report in Office, Chief of Engineers Sec. 107, P.L. 86-645 H. Doc. 303, 77th Cong., 1st Sess.5 Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 38-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (continued) Acts Work Authorized Documents NEAH BAY, WASH. (See Section 11 of Text) June 20, 1938 Rubblestone breakwater. Sept. 3, 1954 July 13, 1892 July 3, 1930 Mar. 2, 1945 Sept. 3, 1954 Mar. 2, 1919 Mar. 3, 1925 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 July 13, 1892 Aug. 30, 1935 Oct. 23, 1962 June 13, 1902 July 3, 1930 Aug. 26, 1937 Aug. 30, 1935 Sept. 3, 1954 Oct. 23, 1962 July 14, 1960 as amended Reinforcement of existing revetment. PUGET SOUND AND ITS TRIBUTARY WATERS, WASH. (See Section 12 of Text) Maintenance of the rivers tributary to Puget Sound by snagging and dredging; and removal of floating debris from Seattle Harbor. QUILLAYUTE RIVER, WASH. (See Section 13 of Text) Jetty (5 feet high) on easterly side of mouth, and a dike with groins, on westerly side, to stabilize entrance. 12 Maintenance dredging to provide a channel 6 feet deep and of suitable width from ocean to within river mouth. Raising jetty to 15 feet; channel 10 by 100 feet, 2,000 feet long; moorage basin.'3 SEATTLE HARBOR, WASH. (See Section 14 of Text) Maintenance of East and West Waterways 750 feet wide and 34 feet deep, and of Duwamish Waterway 20 feet deep and 150 feet wide as far south as Eighth Avenue South Bridge. Enlargement of Duwamish Waterway. 14 Maintenance of East Waterway between 750-foot section and Spokane Street, and turning basin at junction of East and Duwamish Waterways. SWINOMISH CHANNEL, WASH. (See Section 15 of Text) Channel 4 feet deep and 100 feet wide, and dike construction. Enlargement of channel to present project dimensions. Removal of navigation hazards at "Hole-in-the-Wall". TACOMA HARBOR, WASH. (See Section 16 of Text) City Waterway. Hylebos Waterway Training walls at mouth of Puyallup River (previously authorized by Public Works Administration Sept. 6, 1933). Blair Waterway extension. Blair and Hylebos Waterways extension. WESTHAVEN COVE SMALL BOAT BASIN, WASH. (See Section 17 of Text) Removal of 350-foot southwestern extension of the breakwater, replacing it with an 865-foot northeastern extension, and adding a 200-foot spur breakwater along the southerly entrance. 38-22 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 51, 75th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 404, 83rd Cong., 2d Sess.4 Annual Report for 1893, page 3425 11 H. Doc. 125, 71st Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 218, 78th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 579, 81st Cong., 2d Sess.S S. Doc. 313, 65th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 108, 68th Cong., 1st Sess., and H. Doc. 126, 71st Cong., 2nd Sess.5 H. Doc. 211, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess.5 H. Doc. 31, 52d Cong., 1st Sess. and Annual Report, 1892, p. 2752 S. Committee Print, 73d Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 499, 87 Cong., 2d Sess.5 H. Doc. 76, 56th Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Does. 25, 71st Cong., 2d Sess., and 91, 74th Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 55, 72d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 171, 84th Cong., 2d Sess. S. Doc. 101, 87th Cong., 2d Sess.5 Detailed Project Report in Office, Chief of Engineers Sec. 107, P.L. 86-64515 SEATTLE, WASH., DISTRICT TABLE 38-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (continued) Acts Work Authorized Documents July 27, 1916 Aug. 30, 193510 Aug. 30, 193516 Mar. 2, 1945 Sept. 3, 1954 June 25, 1910 Mar. 4, 1913 Aug. 8, 1917 Sept. 22, 1922 June 26, 19349 Aug. 30, 193510 May 17, 1950 May 10, 1977 June 30, 1948 as amended June 30, 1948 as amended Dec. 15, 1970 Nov. 7, 1966 WILLAPA RIVER AND HARBOR AND NASELLE RIVER, WASH. (See Section 18 of Text) Channel 24 feet deep, 200 feet wide, in Willapa River, and 150 feet wide in the forks. Maintenance of channel over bar to a depth of 26 feet and minimum width of 500 feet. For cutoff channel at Narrows. Channel from deep water in Palix River to Bay Center dock. Widen Willapa River channel to 360 and 250 feet between South Bend and the forks; Tokeland and Nahcotta basins; and Naselle River clearance. LAKE WASHINGTON SHIP CANAL, WASH. (See Section 22 of Text) For a double lock and fixed dam with gated spillway and necessary accessory works at entrance to Salmon Bay; dredging a channel from locks to deep water in Puget Sound, and excavation by local interests of a channel from locks into Lake Washington. Dredging below locks and revetting canal basis. Increased dimensions of channel between Puget Sound and locks and a 600-foot extension of lower guide pier. Operating and care of locks and dam provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for Rivers ahd Harbors. Enlarge channel between locks and Lake Washington. CLARK FORK RIVER, MISSOULA, MONT. (See Section 23 of Text Construction of levee and floodgate structure at area 5, levee and floodwall at area 3, and levee extension at area 3. FLATHEAD RIVER NEAR KALISPELL, MONT. (See Section 24 of Text) Construct 33,000 lineal feet of earth levee along a 9-mile length of river. OKANOGAN RIVER, OMAK, WASH. (See Section 25 of Text) Construction of levee improvements including 6500 feet of levee on the east bank and about 7700 feet of levee on the west bank. OKANOGAN RIVER, OROVILLE, WASH. (See Section 26 of Text) Provides for raising 6900 feet of existing levee an average of two feet and provides 2400 feet of new levee averaging six feet in height and would provide protection against a 100-year flood. PLACER CREEK, IDAHO (See Section 27 of Text) Construction of 3,700 feet concrete channel to confine Placer Creek flows through Wallace, Idaho. SKAGIT RIVER, WASH. (LEVEE AND CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS) (See Section 28 of Text) Provides for raising and strengthening existing levees and H. Doc. 706, 63d Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 41, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 37, 73d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 481, 76th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 425, 83d Cong., 2d Sess. 6 H. Doc. 953, 60th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 800, 64th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 324, 67th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 140, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. 5 H. Doc. 531, 81st cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 635, 94th Cong., 2d Sess. 5 Detailed Project Report in Office, Chief of Engineers17 Sec. 205, P.L. 80-858 Detailed Project Report in Office, Chief of Engineers is Sec. 205, P.L. 80-858 H. Doc. 357, 91st Cong., 2d Sess.6 H. Doc., 89th Cong., 2d Sess. 5 38-23 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 38-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (continued) Acts Work Authorized Documents June 22, 1936 June 28, 1938 June 22, 1936 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended Dec. 22, 1944 May 17, 1950 Aug. 6, 1958 June 22, 1936 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended Oct. 23, 1962 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended Mar. 7, 1974 Mar. 7, 1974 May 17, 1950 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended July 24, 1946 June 30, 1948 July 9, 1952 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended Oct. 22, 1976 as amended on May 4, 1977 minor channel improvements to increase minimum channel capacity from 91,000 to 120,000 cubic feet per second. STILLAGUAMISH RIVER, WASH. (See Section 29 of Text) Improvement of flood channel by clearing and bank revetment at 26 places; concrete weir at head of Cook Slough; and 2 cutoff channels in Cook Slough. Maintenance of improvements. TACOMA, PUYALLUP RIVER, WASH. (See Section 30 of Text) Channel improvement to protect people and industrial section of city of Tacoma. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. WILLAPA RIVER AT RAYMOND, WASH. (See Section 31 of Text) Levee system at Raymond to protect municipal areas from tidal waters. HOWARD A. HANSON DAM, WASH. (See Section 35 of Text) Eagle Gorge flood control dam on Green River. Redesignation of project as Howard A. Hanson Dam. MUD MOUNTAIN DAM, WASH. (See Section 36 of Text) Flood control dam on White River. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. WYNOOCHEE LAKE, WASH. (See Section 37 of Text) Dam and reservoir for water supply, flood control, irrigation, fish and wildlife, and recreation. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. Transfer to State of Washington as a part of project costs $696,000 for construction of fish hatchery facilities. Amend contract between city of Aberdeen and United States for use of storage space, permitting deferral of the major portion of the first 10-year payments. ALBENI FALLS DAM, IDAHO (See Section 39 of Text) Multi-purpose dam with powerhouse. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. CHIEF JOSEPH DAM -RUFUS WOODS LAKE, WASH. (See Section 40 of Text) Multi-purpose dam and powerhouse on Columbia River at Foster Creek. Redesignation of the project as Chief Joseph Dam. Designation of reservoir as Rufus Woods Lake. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. School facilities for education of dependents of construction personnel. H. Doc. 657, 71st Cong., 3d Sess.5 S. Comm. Print, Puyallup River, Wash., 74th Cong., 2d Sess. 5 Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 701, 77th Cong., 2d Sess.5 H. Doc. 271, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. 5 P.L. 85-592 S. Comm. Print, Puyallup River, Wash., 74th Cong., 2d Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 601, 87th Cong., 2d Sess 5 Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 P.L. 93-251 P.L. 93-251 S. Doc. 9, 81st Cong., 1st Sess.5 Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 693, 79th Cong., 2d Sess.5 P.L. 858, 80th Cong., 2d Sess. P.L. 469, 82d Cong., 2d Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 P.L. 94-587 P.L. 95-26 38-24 SEATTLE, WASH., DISTRICT TABLE 38-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (continued) Acts Work Authorized Documents LIBBY DAM - LAKE KOOCANUSA, MONT. (See Section 41 of Text) Multi-purpose dam and powerhouse, and reregulating facilities. School facilities for education of dependents of construction personnel, Libby project. Airport facility at Kelley Flats, Mont. Design standards for relocation of Montana State Highway 37 to be those adopted by State of Montana pursuant to provisions of Highway Safety Act of 1966. Participation with State of Montana in construction, operation and maintenance of fish hatchery facilities. Designation of lake formed by the waters impounded by Libby Dam as Lake Koocanusa. Design and construction of sewage collection and sewage treatment facility as part of relocation of municipal facilities of Rexford, Montana; and compensation for railroad employees suffering long-term economic injury through reduction of income as result of the relocation of rail transportation facilities due to the construction of Libby Dam. Phase I design memorandum stage for installation of power generating facilities at Libby Reregulating Dam. Construction of fish production measures to compensate for fish losses attributed to the project, and for acquisition of necessary real estate, construction of access roads and utilities (Amends P.L. 91-282 by increasing limitation from $750,000 to $4,000,000). Acquisition of land not to exceed $2,000,000 for prevention of wildlife grazing losses caused by the project. Reimbursement (not to exceed $350,000) to Boundary County, Idaho for reconstruction of Deep Creek Bridge made necessary by duration of high flows during drawdown operations at Libby Dam. Compensation, not to exceed $1,500,000, to Drainage Districts and owners of leveed and unleveed lands, in Kootenai Flats, Boundary County, Idaho, for damages caused by duration of higher flows during drawdown operations at Libby Dam. 1. Contains latest published map of Squalicum Creek Waterway. 2. Contains latest published map of small-boat basin. 3. Contains latest published map of Whatcom Creek Waterway. 4. Authorized by Chief of Engineers 10 February 1976. 5. Contains latest published map. 6. Deferred. 7. Inactive. 8. A portion deferred. 9. Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. 10. Included in Public Works Administration Program. 11. Annual Report for 1913 contains latest published map (Page 3127). 12. A portion inactive. H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess.6 P.L. 89-789 P.L. 90-23919 P.L. 90-48320 P.L. 91-28221 P.L. 91-625 P.L. 91-611 S. Doc. 93-29, 93d Cong., 1st Sess., P.L. 93-251 P.L. 93-251 P.L. 93-251 P.L. 93-251 P.L. 93-251 13. Maintenance of these items, as well as sandspit north of James Island, is included in this modification. 14. Includes settling basin of 100,000 cubic yards capacity which has been classified as inactive. 15. Authorized by Chief of Engineers 7 February 1979. 16. Included in Emergency Relief Program, May 28, 1935. 17. Authorized by Chief of Engineers 7 June 1977. 18. Authorized by Chief of Engineers 15 March 1979. 19. Supplemental Appropriations Act of 1968, Section 502. 20. Flood Control Act of 1968, Section 212. 21. River Basin Monetary Authorization and Miscellaneous Civil Works Amendments Act of 1970, Section 7. 38-25 May 17, 1950 Nov. 7, 1966 Jan. 2, 1968 Aug. 13, 1968 June 19, 1970 Dec. 31, 1970 Dec. 31, 1970 Mar. 7, 1974 Mar. 7, 1974 Mar. 7, 1974 Mar. 7, 1974 Mar. 7, 1974 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 38-C LAKE WASHINGTON SHIP CANAL, WASH. PRINCIPAL FEATURES OF DOUBLE LOCK AND DAM (See Section 22 of Text) Section Large Lock Small Lock Miles above mouth 1% 11/4 Clear width of chamber Feet 80 28 Maximum available length Feet 760 123 Lift Feet 26 26 Depth on upper miter sill 1 Feet 36 16 Depth on intermediate miter sill 2 Feet 29 - Depth on lower miter sill 2 Feet 29 16 Character of foundation Clay Clay Kind of dam Fixed dam with Fixed dam with gated spillway. gated spillway. Type of construction Concrete Concrete Year completed 1916 1916 Cost 3 3 1. Low water in upper pool. 3. Cost of double lock and dam was $2,224,712 and the emergency gates, 2. Mean lower low water in Puget Sound. completed in 1923, $174,693. TABLE 38-D PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS (See Section 26 of Text) Name of Project Date Survey Conducted Washington: Edmonds Harbor July 1981 Kingston Harbor July 1981 Mats Mats Bay October - December 1980 Olympia Harbor January - February 1981 Port Angeles Harbor August 1981 Port Gamble July - August 1981 Port Townsend October - December 1980 Shilshole Bay October 1980, February -June 1981 Waterway Connecting Port Townsend and Oak Bay October - December 1980 38-26 SEATTLE, WASH.. DISTRICT TABLE 38-E OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Section 20 of Text) For Last Cost to Sept. 30, 1981 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance 1 Anacortes Navigation Channel, Wash.2 ' 1 5 1977 825,2623 Bellingham Harbor, Wash. (I&J Street Waterway) 2 15 1966 125,634 6,570 Blaine Harbor, Wash.2 1958 346,650 30,939 Brownsville, Wash.1' 1972 79,3054 - Columbia River, Wenatchee to Kettle Falls, Wash.2 1923 274,3905 7,693 Edmonds Harbor, Wash. 1966 - 16,889 Flathead River, Mont.2 1901 9,811 - Hammersley Inlet, Wash.2 17 1950 9,000 29,004 Hoquiam River, Wash.2 1950 51,294 13,221 Kingston Harbor, Wash.2 1967 262,5706 25,9427 Kootenai River, Idaho and Mont.2 1933 9,255 5,643 Mats Mats Bay, Wash.2 15 1970 137,6798 16,812 Okanogan and Pend Oreille Rivers'9 1913 32,000 6,000 Olympia Harbor, Wash.18 1975 464,7829 610,74810 Polson Bay, Flathead Lake, Mont.2 1918 4,491 259 Port Angeles Harbor, Wash.'6 1960 470,873 51,565 Port Gamble Harbor, Wash.16 1953 11,911" 51,410 Port Orchard Bay, Wash.2 1928 42,804 12,731 Port Townsend, Wash.2 1974 480,89912 56,589 Shilshole Bay, Seattle, Wash.2 1962 2,575,091 34,891 Skagit River, Wash.'7 1950 102,33013 60,265 Stillaguamish River, Wash. 1946 4,234 '4 Waterway Connecting Port Townsend and Oak Bay, Wash.2 1975 73,322 248,712 1. Includes applicable portion of reconnaissance and condition survey costs. 10. lIncludes $14,418 expended for previous project. 2. Completed. 11. Excludes $21,260 contributed funds expended. 3. Excludes $6,700 contributed funds expended. 12. Excludes $85,223 contributed funds expended. 4. Project deferred pending compliance by sponsor with local cooperation 13. Includes $2,500 expended for previous project. requirements. 14. For economic study only. 5. Includes $8,005 expended for previous project. 15. Authorized by Chief of Engineers. 6. Excludes $117,585 contributed funds expended. 16. Deauthorized 5 August 1977 (uncompleted portion). 7. Includes $5,000 for mitigation shore damages study expended. 17. Deauthorized 3 October 1978 (uncompleted portion). 8. Excludes $28,288 contributed funds expended. 18. Deferred. 9. Includes $183,257 for previous projects, and $2,803 expended for restudy 19. Abandoned. Fiscal Years 1971-1973. 38-27 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 38-F NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation Activities Pursuant to Section 107 Public Law 86-645 (Preauthorization)1 (See Section 21 of Text) Study Identification Fiscal Year Costs (1981) Brownsville Marina, Wash. $ 3,883 Floating Breakwater Prototype Test Program, West Point, Seattle, Wash. 250,121 Neah Bay Small Boat Basin, Wash. 74,318 Seacrest Small Boat Harbor, Wash. 46,315 TOTAL $ 374,637 1. For fiscal year costs on Bellingham, Squalicum Small Boat Harbor, Wash.; Kenmore Commercial Navigation Channel, Wash.; and Westhaven Cove East Bay Small Boat Basin, Olympia, Wash.; Friday Harbor Marina, Wash.; Small Boat Basin, Wash., see Table 38-A. TABLE 38-G OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 33 of Text) For Last Cost to Sept. 30, 1981 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance 1 American Lake, Vicinity of Fort Lewis, Wash.' 2 1957 59,5823 Coeur d'Alene, Spokane River, Idaho2 1942 152,872 Columbia River Basin, Local Protection Projects, Idaho, Mont., and Wash.: Entiat River, Wash." 1958 -- Lightning Creek, Clark Fork, Idaho2 1959 42,726 Methow River, Wash. 8 1958 -- Okanogan River, Wash.8 1958 1,1004 St. Regis River, Mont.9 1958 1,4004 Wenatchee River, Wash.9 1958 -- Yakima River at Ellensburg, Wash.8 1980 30,0005 Dungeness River, Clallam County, Wash.' 2 1964 392.1066 St. Maries, St. Joe River, Idaho2 1942 357,698 Sammamrish River, Wash.2 1967 2,582,5377 Shelton Creek, Wash.' 2 to 1979 872,020 Skagit River, Wash. (Avon Bypass)" 1968 54,4684 Spokane, Spokane River, Wash.8 1939 2,9444 Startup, Wallace River, Wash.' 2 1970 271,713 Upper Puyallup River, Wash.2 1938 71,495 38-28 SEATTLE, WASH., DISTRICT TABLE 38-G OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (continued) (See Section 33 of Text) For Last Cost to Sept. 30, 1981 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance ' Wenatchee, Canyons 1 and 2, Wash. 1977 544,331 Yakima, Yakima River, Wash.2 1948 381,961 1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of Section 205, Public Law 6. Includes Public Works Acceleration Act funds of $340,067. 858, 80th Congress, as amended. 7. Excludes $689,523 contributed funds expended. 2. Completed. 8. Inactive. 3. Excludes $10,000 contributed funds expended. 9. Deauthorized 3 October 1978. 4. Preconstruction planning only. 10. Includes $100,221 preauthorization cost. 5. Excludes $14,300 for restudy. 11. Deferred. TABLE 38-H FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Section 34 of Text) Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (Preauthorization)1 Study Identification Fiscal Year Costs (1981) Bowman Hilton Mobile Home Park, Wash. $ 7 ,500 Dosewallips River, Brinnon, Wash. 13,000 Goose Creek, Wilbur, Wash. 7,500 Stillaguamish River, Stanwood, Wash. 140,000 Wallace River, Startup, Wash. 19,898 White River, Pierce County, Wash. 5,000 TOTAL $ 192,898 1. For fiscal year costs on Okanogan River at Omak and Oroville, Wash., see Table 38-A. Emergency Flood Control Activities - Repair, Flood Fighting, and Rescue Work (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation) Project and Location Fiscal Year Costs (1981) Advance preparation $ 199,499 Flood emeregency operations 450,734 38-29 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 38-H FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER (continued) SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Section 34 of Text) Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (Preauthorization)1 Emergency Flood Control Activities - Repair, Flood Fighting, and Rescue Work (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation) Project and Location Fiscal Year Costs (1981) Repair and restoration: Bonner County, Idaho 92,000 Clallam County, Wash. 29,070 King County, Wash. 125,461 Skagit County, Wash. 358,162 Snohomish County, Wash. 541,924 Whatcom County, Wash. 69,295 Yakima County, Wash. 128,000 TOTAL $ 1,994,145 Emergency Bank Protection (Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Congress). Project and Location Fiscal Year Costs (1981) Bogachiel River, Undie Road, Forks, Wash. $ 57,000 Bogachiel River, Highway 101, near Forks, Wash. 156,000 Clallam River, Highway 112, Wash. 43,010 Dungeness River, Sequim, Wash. 3,598 North Fork Skykomish River, Index, Wash. 219,650 Pilchuck River, Everett, Wash. -6,610 Queets River, Jefferson County, City of Queets Sewage Lagoon, Wash. 125,000 Quillayute River, Clallam County, Wash. 10,891 Quinault River, Grays Harbor County, Taholah, Wash. 207,193 Skagit River, Deadman's Slough, Wash. -10,878 Skagit River, Pressentin Creek, Wash. 9,139 TOTAL $ 813,993 38-30 SEATTLE, WASH., DISTRICT TABLE 38-I OTHER AUTHORIZED MULTIPLE PURPOSE PROJECTS, INCLUDING POWER (See Section 42 of Text) For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1981 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Priest Rapids Dam, Columbia River, Wash. 1954 350,0001 1. For partnership planning. Excludes funds expended for acquisition of lands in accordance with Public Law 544, 83d Congress. Project constructed by Grant under partnership arrangement for Priest Rapids and Wanapum Dams, County Public Utility District. 38-31 WALLA WALLA, WASH., DISTRICT* This District consists of all Columbia River drainage and Dam, except the Yakima River Basin above the Van Giesen tributaries thereto between the head of the McNary pool Street Bridge near Richland, Washington. (River Mile 345.4) and the Umatilla Bridge below McNary IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Channels and Harbors Page 1. Other Authorized Navigation Projects ....................................... .39-1 Flood Control Local Protection 2. Columbia River Basin, Local Flood Protection Projects ........................ 39-1 3. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects .................................. 39-2 4. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ............ .......................... 39-2 5. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ........................... 39-2 Reservoirs 6. 7. 8. 9. Lucky Peak Lake, Idaho ......................... 39-2 Mill Creek Lake, Wash. .......................... 39-2 Willow Creek Lake, Heppner, Oreg. ........... 39-3 Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations ............................ 39-3 Navigation Channels and Harbors 1. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS See Table 39-C. *All cost and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. Multiple-Purpose Projects, Page Including Power Dworshak Dam and Reservoir, Idaho ............. 39-3 Ice Harbor Lock and Dam - Lake Sacajawea -Wash .............. ................ 39-4 Lewiston - Clarkston Bridge, Idaho & Wash ................................... 39-4 Little Goose Lock and Dam - Lake Bryan - Wash. ............................. 39-5 Lower Granite Lock and Dam, Wash. .............. 39-5 Lower Monumental Lock and Dam, Wash..........39-5 Lower Snake River, Fish & Wildlife Compensation, Wash., Oreg., Idaho ............... 39-6 McNary Lock and Dam - Lake Wallula - Oreg. & Wash. ................................... 39-6 Snake River Downstream from Johnson Bar Landing, Oreg., Wash. & Idaho ................. 39-7 Other Authorized Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power ........................ 39-7 General Investigations Surveys ........................................ 39-7 Collection and Study of Basic Data ................ 39-7 Research and Development ...................... 39-8 Flood Control Local Protection 2. COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN, LOCAL FLOOD PROTECTION PROJECTS Location. Improvements included in this project are along Columbia River and its tributaries. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 39-1 I I _ REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 Existing project. Flood Control Act of 1950 approved a general comprehensive plan for Columbia River Basin for flood control and other purposes based on plans in H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. and authorized $75 million to be appropriated for partial accomplishment of certain projects. Of that authorization, an amount not to exceed $15 million was allotted for construction of local flood protection works throughout Columbia River Basin, subject to conditions that all work undertaken pursuant to authorization should be economically justified prior to construction, and local cooperation specified in 1936 Flood Control Act, as amended, should be required. (See Tables 39-B and 39-D for projects in Walla Walla District.) Local cooperation. Section 3 of the Flood Control Act approved June 22, 1936, as amended, applies to all the flood control projects. Operations and results during fiscal year. No projects were recommended for deauthorization during the fiscal year. 3. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Federal law requires local interests to maintain and operate completed local protection projects in accordance with regulations prescribed by Secretary of Army. Inspections were made to determine extent of compliance and to advise local interests as necessary of measures required to correct deficiencies. See Table 39-E for inspections made during fiscal year. Fiscal year costs were $79,886. Total costs to September 30, 1981 have been $540,106. 4. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See Table 39-F. 5. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Cong., as amended (preauthorization). See Table 39-G. Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation). Federal costs for period were $81,827 for disaster preparedness and $271,694 for rehabilitation. Snagging and clearing of navigable streams and tributaries in interest of flood control (Sec. 208, 1954 Flood Control Act, Public Law 780, 83d Cong. as amended by Sec. 26 of the 1974 Water Resource Development Act). Federal costs for snagging and clearing this fiscal year totaled $5,000 at Salmon River, Idaho. Reservoirs 6. LUCKY PEAK LAKE, IDAHO Location. On Boise River in southwestern Idaho about 10 miles southeast of City of Boise. Existing project. See Table 39-B for authorizing legislation. A rolled-earthfill dam about 250 feet high above streambed and 1,700 feet long at crest, with a lake providing a total storage at upper operating lake level of 306,000 acre-feet. For further details see page 2000 of Annual Report for 1962. Federal cost of completed project was $19,081,250. Expenditures on recreation facilities for completed project have been $499,431 raising total project cost to $19,580,681. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance: Normal operation for flood control, recreation, and irrigation continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of existing project was initiated November 1949 and completed June 1961. A feasible method of achieving better flood control through diversion into New York Canal, through Lake Lowell, and into the Snake River has been developed but rejected by local interests due to the infrequent use of this diversion method. Since 1961, $38,553,000 in potential flood damages have been prevented by the project. Final Environmental Impact Statement on the initial project was filed with the Council on Environmental Quality on 29 November 1976. A revised draft Environmental Impact Statement for the modification work was filed with the Council on Environmental Quality on 18 September 1978. During the detailed investigation of outlet capacity and the potential for adding hydropower to the existing project, a need for an auxiliary outlet became apparent. Construction of an auxiliary outlet was authorized in the Water Resource Development Act of 1976 but to date it has not been funded. In FY 1978, an "Interim Feasibility Report on Modification of Lucky Peak Dam and Lake" (power facilities) was submitted to the Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors and approved. States, agencies, and the Chief of Engineers have commented on the report to the Secretary of the Army. The report was forwarded to the Bureau of Reclamation in August 1980. No further action has been taken. A license to construct and operate power facilities at the project was issued by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Project #2832) to the Boise Project Board of Control on 10 June 1980 and modified on 9 October 1980. The license requires that construction begin within two years and be completed within four years of the issuing date of the license. 7. MILL CREEK LAKE, WASH. Location. In and upstream from Walla Walla, Wash., on Mill Creek, a tributary of Walla Walla River. Existing project. See Table 39-B for authorizing legislation. Off-stream earthfill storage dam about 145 feet high and 3,200 feet long at the crest, two concrete-lined outlet channels, an earthfill diversion dam, and division structures. A channel through the City of Walla Walla was added to the project in 1941. For further details see page 2005 of Annual Report for 1962. Federal cost of original project was $2,162,155. Adding recreation facilities has thus far increased project costs by $68,446 to $2,230,601. Not included in that cost is $80,000 contributed by local interests toward construction of the channel through Walla Walla. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. For details see page 2006 of Annual Report for 1962. Operations and results during fiscal year. The purpose of the rehabilitation of the existing project is to correct the seepage and internal erosion which have occurred during each subsequent filling of the reservoir requiring limited flood control use of the project. 39-2 WALLA WALLA, WASH., DISTRICT Supplement No. 1 to Design Memorandum No. 5, "Fish Passage Facilities" and Design Memorandum No. 6, "Storage Dam Rehabilitation," were completed and Design Memorandum No. 6 was approved in June 1980. With completion of the plans and specifications for the concrete cutoff wall at the dam, the contract was awarded and is 76 percent complete. The project cost estimate for the rehabilitation is $16,000,000 (full funding). Operation and Maintenance: Routine-maintenance by Government forces continued, which included regulation of water control structures and care of recreation area. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was completed in 1942. Paving of channel through City of Walla Walla was completed in 1948. Park and recreation facilities were opened to public July 1, 1964. Since 1942, $3,685,000 in potential flood damages have been prevented by the combined storage and channel operation. Final Environmental Impact Statement was filed with the Council on Environmental Quality on 12 December 1975. 8. WILLOW CREEK LAKE, HEPPNER, OREGON Location. On Willow Creek just upstream from Heppner and just downstream from junction of Balm Fork and Willow Creek in Section 35, Township 2 South, Range 26 East, Willamette Meridian. Existing project. See Table 39-B for authorizing legislation. Project will provide flood protection to the City of Heppner and downstream area by controlling runoff from a drainage area of 96 square miles. The dam will be a roller compacted concrete structure 160 feet high at crest elevation 2130. Ancillary features include a center uncontrolled spillway with a maximum flood capacity of 93,300 cfs, an outlet works with a capacity of 500 cfs, a minor flow works and diversion works. Gross storage capacity of the project will be 13,250 acre-feet, consisting of 7,750 acre-feet for exclusive flood control, 1,750 acre-feet for joint flood control and irrigation, 1,750 acre-feet exclusive irrigation, and 2,000 acre-feet dead storage for fish, wildlife, recreation, sediment accumulation, and aesthetics. Limited recreation facilities will be provided. Estimated Federal cost (full funding) is $37,000,000. Local cooperation. Local interests will not be required to share in construction costs. Operations and results during fiscal year. The final Environmental Impact Statement was filed with the Environmental Protection Agency on 20 December 1979. The provisions of the Clean Water Act were met by a Section 404(b)(1) Evaluation and a public notice issued 12 January 1980, and a Section 401 certification from the State of Oregon on 15 February 1980. Land acquisition is about 90 percent complete. Contracts were awarded in the fourth quarter of FY 1981 for relocation of the city water main, water tank, and road. Work is underway on these contracts. Condition at end of fiscal year. Plans and specifications for the main dam are complete with contract award scheduled for early FY 1982. The project is 17 percent complete. 9. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS Functional regulation of non-Corps projects was accomplished under several authorities. Regulation of Palisades, Little Wood, and Anderson Ranch Reservoirs in Idaho, and Bully Creek, Warm Springs, Agency Valley, and Mason Reservoirs in Oregon, was accomplished as authorized under Section 7, Flood Control Act of 1944, and coordinated with the Bureau of Reclamation. Flood control operations at Jackson Lake, Arrowrock Reservoir, and Lake Lowell were in accordance with formal agreements with the Bureau of Reclamation. Regulation of American Falls, Owyhee, Magic, Mackay, Cascade, and Deadwood Reservoirs, Idaho, for flood control was accomplished under informal agreements. Brownlee, Oxbow, and Hells Canyon Reservoirs provided flood control regulation in accordance with provisions of the Federal Power Commission license to Idaho Power Company. Fiscal year costs were $144,675. Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 10. DWORSHAK DAM AND RESERVOIR, IDAHO Location. Dam is on North Fork Clearwater River 1.9 miles above its junction with Clearwater River, near Orofino, Idaho, and about 35 miles east of Lewiston, Idaho. Existing project. See Table 39-B for authorizing legislation. A straight concrete gravity dam about 717 feet in maximum structural height above foundation and 3,300 feet long at crest elevation 1613. The reservoir has a gross storage capacity of 3,453,000 acre-feet, of which 2,000,000 acre-feet are effective for both local and regional flood control, and for at-site and downstream power generation. In addition, the reservoir, extending 53 miles into a rugged and relatively inaccessible timberland, provides important transportation savings in connection with movements of marketable logs. The project also provides substantial recreation benefits. Powerhouse includes two 90,000 and one 220,000 kilowatt generating units, with provisions for three additional 220,000 kilowatt units for an ultimate installed capactiy.of 1,060,000 kilowatts. Principal project data are set forth in Table 39-H. Fish passage at Dworshak Dam is not feasible, and a hatchery has been built below the dam to assure continuance of fish runs. The reservoir area has been habitat for elk, deer, and other wildlife. Project plans include acquisition of land outside reservoir limits to mitigate losses of big game winter browse areas inundated by reservoir. Estimated total cost for new work is $325,340,000 consisting of $322,600,000 (full funding) for construction and $2,740,000 for value of public-domain lands. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Contracts were awarded in May 1980 to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the National Park Service to conduct field tests evaluating the impacts of greater fluctuation downstream of the dam by the addition of a 220,000 kilowatt fourth generating unit. These agencies were to evaluate the impacts on fish, wildlife, recreation, and safety. However, public opposition to an additional generating unit resulted in the withdrawal of support by the Governor of Idaho and subsequent termination of the studies. Wildlife habitat browse development continues on project lands to provide winter browse for elk and deer. Acquisition efforts continue for lands outside reservoir limits to mitigate losses of 39-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 winter browse areas. The resource management maintenance building was completed and a contract was awarded to pass dam drainage water around the ice sluice. Operation and maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance continued. A release of 2,400,000 smolts weighing 269,000 pounds was made in the spring of 1981. These fish came from 2,519 adult steelhead that returned to the hatchery and were spawned in the spring of 1980. The 1981 return of adults totaled 1968 and they are expected to product 2,600,000 smolts, weighing 330,000 pounds, for release in 1982. Rainbow trout releases into the reservoir totaled 100,000 fish and 70,000 pounds in 1981. A total of 2.11 billion kilowatt hours of electric energy was delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project started April 1963 and is complete except for recreation facilities, and fish and wildlife development. It became operational for flood control June 1972 and has prevented about $728,000 in potential flood damages downstream since then. All project lands have been acquired except those required to replace the loss of wildlife browse areas from inundation by reservoir. Relocations are estimated to be 100 percent complete; dam, 100 percent; fish and wildlife facilities, 86 percent; powerplant, 100 percent; reservoir clearing, 100 percent; and recreation facilities, 64 percent. A reconnaissance report justifying the feasibility and cost benefits for the addition of a 220,000-kilowatt fourth generating unit was completed in FY 1978. Environmental and economic studies on additional generating units have been curtailed due to public opposition. Units 4, 5 and 6 are now classified "inactive". Power generating Unit No. 1, 90,000-kilowatt capacity, was put in service March 1, 1973; Unit No. 2, also 90,000-kilowatt capacity, began producing April 6, 1973; Unit No. 3, 220,000- kilowatt capacity, went on the line April 20, 1973. Eighty mini-recreation sites have been established along the reservoir shoreline. Each site includes at least a picnic table, U.S. Forest Service-type fireplace, and chemical toilet. Some of the sites have several picnic tables. Dent Acres recreation site was opened to the public in August 1976. Facilities consist of a boat launching ramp, boat docks, car-trailer parking, comfort stations, and fully developed overnight camping. Freeman Creek recreation site is open to boat access. Vehicular traffic is restricted pending improvement of the county road providing access. The handling docks and overnight parking facility are incomplete. Power generation through September 1981 has been 15.73 billion kilowatt hours, representing a gross income of $68.1 million to the U.S. Treasury from sale of power by Bonneville Power Administration. 11. ICE HARBOR LOCK AND DAMLAKE SACAJAWEA, WASH. Location. On Snake River, 9.7 miles above river mouth at head of Lake Wallula and 12 miles east of Pasco, Wash. Existing project. See Table 39-B for authorizing legislation. The project includes a dam, powerplant, navigation lock, fish ladders, appurtenant facilities, and relocation of railroads. Project provides for navigation, hydroelectric power generation, recreation, and incidental irrigation. Reservoir has normal operating range between elevations 440 and 437 mean sea level, and extends upstream about 31.9 miles, providing slack water to Lower Monumental Lock and Dam. Structure is about 2,790 feet long and about 130 feet high above streambed. Beginning at south end, project consists of a concrete nonoverflow section, concrete powerhouse, spillway dam, navigation lock, and an earth and rockfill embankment at north abutment. Fish passing facilities, including two ladders, are provided. Powerplant now has three 90,000-kilowatt units and three 111,000-kilowatt units in operation. Spillway dam is 610 feet long, and overflow crest at Elevation 391 mean sea level is surmounted by 10 radial gates, 50 feet wide by 51 feet high, which provide capacity to pass a design flood of 850,000 cubic feet per second. Deck is at Elevation 453 mean sea level and provides a service road and track for a gantry crane. Navigation lock is single-lift type with clear plan dimensions of 86 by 675 feet and 15-foot minimum depth over the sills. A navigation channel 250 feet wide and 14 feet deep is provided from mouth of Snake River to dam. Principal project data are set forth in Table 39-H. Estimated cost for new work is $168,087,595 consisting of $129,578,479 for the completed project, $36,672,316 for power units 4 through 6, $87,000 for U.S. Coast Guard navigation aids, $22,300 for value of public-domain lands, $1,645,000 for recreational facilities, and a non-Federal contribution of $82,500 toward an artificial fish spawning channel. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Contracts were awarded for correction of deficiencies at Charbonneau Park. Operation and Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance continued. Contracts were awarded for State of Washington wildlife habitat maintenance. 2.24 billion kilowatt hours of electric energy were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. A total of 4,009,858 tons of cargo passed through navigation lock during calendar year 1980. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction started December 1955 and the project was placed in useful operation January 1962. The project is considered 100 percent complete. An Environmental Impact Statement concerning power units 4 through 6 was filed with the Council on Environmental Quality August 1971. Power generation through September 1981 has been 43.65 billion kilowatt hours, representing a gross income of $78.1 million to the U.S. Treasury from sale of power by Bonneville Power Administration. 12. LEWISTON-CLARKSTON BRIDGE, IDAHO AND WASH. Location. On the Snake River, River Mile 141.3, 1.7 miles upstream of the existing interstate bridge connecting the towns of Lewiston, Idaho and Clarkston, Washington. Existing project. See Table 39-B for authorizing legislation. The project will consist of a new fixed high-level four lane highway bridge and approaches on U.S. Highway 12 across the Snake River to be constructed at a cost "not to exceed $21,000,000". Local cooperation. Non-Federal interests have provided, without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way necessary for the construction of the bridge and its approaches, and after construction have agreed to own, operate toll free, and maintain the bridge and approach facilities. The non-Federal costs for land and relocation are $755,193. 39-4 WALLA WALLA, WASH., DISTRICT Operations and results during fiscal year. Construction of the bridge structure is about 70 percent complete. Condition at end of fiscal year. Delays caused by a subcontractor's strike and concrete engineering difficulties have been made up and the project is on schedule for completion in FY 1982. Final Environmental Impact Statement Supplement filed with the Council on Environmental Quality on 16 July 1979. 13. LITTLE GOOSE LOCK AND DAMLAKE BRYAN, WASH. Location. Dam is 70.3 miles above mouth of Snake River at head of Lower Monumental Lake, about 40 airline miles northerly of Walla Walla, Wash., and 50 miles westerly of Lewiston, Idaho. Existing project. See Table 39-B for authorizing legislation. The project includes a dam, powerplant, navigation lock, fish ladder, and appurtenant facilities. Improvements provide navigation, hydroelectric power generation, recreation, and incidental irrigation. The reservoir has a normal operating range between Elevations 638 and 633 mean sea level. Lake Bryan extends upstream about 37.2 miles and provides slack water to Lower Granite Lock and Dam. Dam structure is 2,670 feet long and about 160 feet high above streambed and consists of a powerhouse, spillway dam, navigation lock, and necessary nonoverflow sections. Fish passing facilities include one ladder with entrances on both shores with a fish channel through spillway which connects to powerhouse fish collection system and south shore ladder. Powerhouse now has six 135,000-kilowatt generating units for a capacity of 810,000 kilowatts. Spillway dam can pass a design flood of 850,000 cubic feet per second. Navigation lock is single-lift type with clear plan dimensions of 86 by 675 feet and a minimum depth of 15 feet over the sills. Relocations along the lake include 32 miles of Camas Prairie Railroad, 5.8 miles of county roads, 2.2 miles of state highways, and Central Ferry bridge. Principal project data are set forth in Table 39-H. Estimated cost for new work is $220,482,526 consisting of $160,413,215 for the completed project, $59,680,311 for power units 4 through 6, $87,000 for U.S. Coast Guard navigation aids, and $302,000 for value of publicly-owned land. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Wildlife facility contracts were awarded in FY 1981 for the fish facilities and habitat development, as well as construction of a visitor's facility. Operation and maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance continued. A total of 2.73 billion kilowatt hours of electric energy was delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. A total of 3,379,847 tons of cargo passed through the navigation lock during calendar year 1980. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is 100 percent complete except for required modifications to the fingerling fish facilities and completion of the visitor's facility. A final Environmental Impact Statement was filed with the Council on Environmental Quality on 8 January 1975. Power generation through September 1981 has been 29.66 billion kilowatt hours, representing a gross income of $50.6 million to the U.S. Treasury from sale of power by Bonneville Power Administration. 14. LOWER GRANITE LOCK AND DAM, WASH. Location. At River Mile 107.5 on Snake River at head of Lake Bryan and about 33 miles downstream from Lewiston, Idaho. Existing project. See Table 39-B for authorizing legislation. The facility includes a dam, powerplant, navigation lock, fish ladder, and appurtenant facilities, and requires about 8 miles of backwater levees along Snake and Clearwater Rivers at Lewiston, Idaho. Benefits afforded by project include slack-water navigation, p6wer generation, recreation, and incidental irrigation. Water surface at the dam varies between Elevations 738 and 724 to maintain a normal operating range between Elevations 738 and 733 in the Lewiston, Idaho-Clarkston, Washington area. Dam structure is about 3,200 feet long and about 146 feet high above streambed. Powerhouse now has six 135,000-kilowatt units. Spillway has a capacity for a design flood of 850,000 cubic feet per second. Navigation lock is a single-lift type (105 feet maximum) with clear plan dimensions of 86 by 675 feet and a minimum depth of 15 feet over the sills. Principal project data are set forth in Table 39-H. Estimated cost for new work (full funding) is $365,948,511 consisting of $319,600,000 for the initial installation, $46,211,511 for power units 4 through 6, $135,000 for U.S. Coast Guard navigation aids, and $2,000 for value of publicly-owned lands. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Contracts continuing for repair of stator winding on generator No. 3, relocation of the navigation lock bridge, fingerling facility modifications and wildlife habitat development occurred in FY 1981. Operation and maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance continued. Contracts were awarded for purchasing an excavator for shallow dredging requirements. A total of 2.69 billion kilowatt hours of electric energy were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. A total of 2,218,357 tons of cargo passed through the navigation lock during calendar year 1980. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction started July 1965 and is about 99 percent complete. Acquisition of lands is 100 percent complete. Lake was filled 15 February 1975 and the first power generating unit went on the line 15 April 1975. Approximately $880,000 in potential flood damage has been prevented since the levees became functional. An Environmental Impact Statement was filed with the Council on Environmental Quality November 1971. A revised statement to include the additional units was filed with the Council on Environmental Quality on 23 July 1975. Installation of three additional 135,000-kilowatt generating units is complete with Unit No. 6 power-on-line date of May 1978. Remaining items of work are: Lewiston's water intake and acquisition of a trash shear boom. Power generation through September 1981 has been 17.07 billion kilowatt hours, representing a gross income of $46.7 million to the U.S. Treasury from sale of power by Bonneville Power Administration. 15. LOWER MONUMENTAL LOCK AND DAM, WASH. Location. On Snake River at head of Lake Sacajawea, about 45 miles northeast of Pasco, Washington, and 41.6 miles above river mouth. 39-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 Existing project. See Table 39-B for authorizing legislation. The facility includes a dam, powerplant, fish ladders, navigation lock, appurtenant facilities, and relocated railroads and highways. The project functions include navigation, hydroelectric power generation, recreation and irrigation, Reservoir has normal operating range between Elevations 540 and 537. The lake extends about 29 miles upstream to Little Goose Lock and Dam. The dam is concrete gravity type with earthfill and rockfill abutments. It is 3,800 feet long including abutments, spillway, navigation lock, and powerhouse, and is about 135 feet high above streambed. There are two fish ladders, one at each end of the dam. Powerhouse has six 135,000-kilowatt units for a total capacity of 810,000 kilowatts. Spillway is 508 feet long, and overflow crest at Elevation 483 feet above mean sea level is surmounted by 8 radial gates, each 50 feet wide and 61 feet high. Deck is at Elevation 553 feet and provides a service road and track for a gantry crane. Navigation lock is single-lift type, with lock chamber 86 by 675 feet and minimum depth of 15 feet over the sills. Principal project data are set forth in Table 39-H. Estimated cost for new work is $236,445,211 consisting of $184,712,361 for the completed project, $51,645,850 for power units 4 through 6, and $87,000 for U.S. Coast Guard navigation aids. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. A contract was awarded for fish pump noise control installation. Operation and maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance continued. A total of 2.33 billion kilowatt hours of electric energy was delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Cargoes totaling 3,572,893 tons passed through navigation lock during calendar year 1980. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began June 1961, and the project was opened to navigation April 1969. The project is 100 percent complete. Power generation through September 1981 has been 31.91 billion kilowatt hours, representing a gross income of 58.4 million to the U.S. Treasury from sale of power by Bonneville Power Administration. A final Environmental Impact Statement was filed with the Council on Environmental Quality on 21 May 1976. 16. LOWER SNAKE RIVER, FISH & WILDLIFE COMPENSATION, WASH., OREG., IDAHO Location. At various locations within the Columbia Snake River drainage in the States of Idaho, Oregon, and Washington. Existing project. See Table 39-B for authorizing legislation. The project will consist of a series of fish hatcheries and wildlife development areas at sites to be selected. The project will compensate for loss of wildlife habitat and anadromous and resident fishery inundated as a result of construction of four multiple purpose dams and reservoirs on the Lower Snake River (Ice Harbor, Lower Monumental, Little Goose, Lower Granite). Estimated Federal cost of the project is $181,000,000 (full funding). Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. In 1980 the first release from the McCall, Idaho summer chinook hatchery was made, and the adult trapping facility which provides the fish egg supply for the McCall Hatchery, became operational. In 1981 McCall released 249,000 summer chinook smolts weighing 14,200 pounds. A total of 524 adults were trapped this year and it is expected that 147,000 smolts will be released next year. Four major contracts were awarded in FY 1981. These were: Lookingglass Hatchery, Lyons Ferry Hatchery Water Supply System, Lyons Ferry Hatchery Phase I, and the Spring Chinook Rearing Facilities at Dworshak National Fish Hatchery. The design for the expansion of Hagerman National Fish Hatchery for steelhead rearing is 90 percent complete. Studies to identify other potential hatchery sites in Oregon and Idaho and contacts with landowners for participation in the off-project wildlife program in Washington are continuing. Condition at end of fiscal year. The real estate design memorandum, feature design memorandum on the McCall Hatchery, Hagerman Hatchery, Lookingglass Hatchery, and the off-project wildlife lands, and the site selection report have all been approved. A final Environmental Impact Statement was filed with Council on Environmental Quality on November 2, 1977. The compensation plan is 19 percent complete. 17. McNARY LOCK AND DAMLAKE WALLULA, OREG. & WASH. Location. On Columbia River 292 miles above mouth, near Umatilla, Oregon, and 3 miles above mouth of Umatilla River. Existing project. See Table 39-B for authorizing legislation. Includes a concrete dam 7,300 feet long overall and 183 feet high above streambed, powerplant with 14 power generating units, navigation lock, fishways, levees and pumping plants, incidental irrigation, and modification and relocation of railroad bridges over the Columbia and Snake Rivers in order to eliminate hazards to navigation. A navigation study is currently underway, however, to evaluate hazardous conditions for downbound river traffic in the navigation channel below the Ice Harbor powerhouse. The study will determine if the project is deficient in respect to the severe crosscurrents which occur and will recommend corrective action. A study has also been initiated to evaluate the feasibility of installing two tube turbine generators with a combined capacity of 6.5 megawatts in the water supply conduits for the North Shore Fishway Attraction Water System. Anticipated annual energy production is 43,500,000 kilowatt hours. A post-authorization change report was submitted in May 1981; no further action has been taken as of 30 September 1981. Principal project data are set forth in Table 39-H. Estimated total cost for new work is $330,723,486 consisting of $322,154,486 for construction, $69,000 for Coast Guard navigation aids, and $8,500,000 for modification of the Union Pacific Railroad bridge over Columbia River by the Coast Guard. Expenditures on recreation facilities for completed project have been $1,426,410. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. The third year of a three-year contract for dredging of the navigation channel was completed, however, the contractor will require a fourth season to complete the work due to differing site conditions and delays caused by inclement weather. Thirty-nine traveling fish screens were placed in the powerhouse intake bulkhead slots to divert downstream migrating fingerlings from passing through the power turbines. The third fish transportation barge was placed in service in March 1981, and a contract for the fourth barge was awarded in August 1981. The barge is scheduled to be in service for the March-April 1982 fish migration. 39-6 WALLA WALLA, WASH., DISTRICT Operation and maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of project continued. Contracts were awarded for painting of the navigation lock, repair of heat pumps and paving and sealing of roadways. A report justifying the need for major powerhouse rehabilitation at McNary is near completion. Approximately 7.12 billion kilowatt hours of electric energy were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. A total of 7,311,132 tons of commodities passed through the navigation lock during calendar year 1980. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction started May 1947 and is 100 percent complete except for modification of fish facilities and dredging of the upstream navigation channel. Project placed on permanent operating basis and lake raised to Elevation 340 in November 1953. Except for maintenance interruptions, all 14 power units have been in commercial operation since February 1957. Power generation through September 1981 has been 163.38 billion kilowatt hours, representing a gross income of $246.4 million to the U.S. Treasury from sale of power by Bonneville Power Administration. A final Environmental Impact Statement was filed with Council on Environmental Quality in June 1976. 18. SNAKE RIVER DOWNSTREAM FROM JOHNSON BAR LANDING, OREG., WASH., & IDAHO Location. On Snake River downstream from Johnson Bar Landing, River Mile 231. Snake River, which is largest tributary of Columbia River, rises in Yellowstone National Park in western part of Wyoming, flows generally westerly for about 1,000 miles, and empties into Columbia River near Pasco, Washington, 324 miles from Pacific Ocean. Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports, page 2246 for 1903; page 1986 for 1906; page 1991 for 1915; and page 1981 for 1962. Existing project. See Table 39-B for authorizing legislation. The River and Harbor Act of 1945 authorized construction of dams as necessary and open channel improvements for purposes of providing slack-water navigation and irrigation between mouth of Snake River and Lewiston, Idaho. That authorization modified previous authorizations only for that portion of improvement below Lewiston, Idaho. Acts of June 13, 1902, and August 30, 1935, as they pertain to open river improvement from Lewiston, Idaho, to Johnson Bar Landing, remain part of existing project. Improvements included in existing project are Ice Harbor Lock and Dam-Lake Sacajawea; Little Goose Lock and Dam- Lake Bryan; Lower Granite Lock and Dam; Lower Monumental Lock and Dam; and open-river improvement, Lewiston to Johnson Bar Landing. Each of the four locks and dams is described in an individual report, and cost and financial data for the entire project are shown on Tables 39-A and 39-I. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. On Snake River from the mouth to Johnson Bar Landing there are 11 privately owned barge terminals in use for shipping grain, petroleum products, fertilizers, cement, and other general cargo. There are also 4 marinas and 28 small-boat launching ramps, all open to public use. The facilities serve slack-water navigation to Snake River Mile 138, the site of Lewiston, Idaho. That slack-water reaches the Lewiston, Idaho-Clarkston, Washington area since the lake behind Lower Granite Dam was filled in February 1975. Operations and results during fiscal year. See individual reports for Ice Harbor, Lower Monumental, Little Goose, and Lower Granite locks and dams. On Snake River from Lewiston, Idaho, to Johnson Bar Landing, reconnaissance and condition surveys were conducted and navigation aids were maintained. Condition at end of fiscal year. Ice Harbor, Lower Monumental, Little Goose and Lower Granite are in full operation. Lower Granite construction is about 99 percent complete. (See individual reports for details.) 19. OTHER AUTHORIZED MULTIPLE-PURPOSE PROJECTS, INCLUDING POWER See Table 39-J. General Investigations 20. SURVEYS The Upper Snake River and Tributaries is the principal ongoing survey. The area covered by the study extends from the headwaters of the Snake River in Wyoming down to and including the Weiser River in Idaho. The potential for supplemental water storage, power generation, and streamflow augmentation to enhance fisheries, continues to be the primary focus. The Columbia River and Tributaries is a survey study directed by the North Pacific Division in which the Walla Walla District is participating. The feasibility of utilizing an outlet at McNary Lock and Dam to furnish water downstream on the Oregon shore for municipal, industrial, irrigation, and fish enhancement use is the primary investigation for Walla Walla District under this study. Also, identification of additional potential water storage sites for the Columbia River System was continued. Total cost of surveys during fiscal year was $616,282. That sum was spent for: flood control studies, $324,320; special studies including Soil Conservation Service, Bureau of Reclamation, Water Quality Management, Cooperation with States, National Wild and Scenic River System, and Technical and Engineer Assistance on Shore Erosion, $98,891; supplemental preauthorization studies - Phase 1, $580; review of authorized projects, $21,602; and $170,890 for review of completed projects. 21. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA During the fiscal year flood hazard data for a number of locations in the District were collected and analyzed. Flood information was provided to several Federal agencies, to the States of Idaho, Oregon, and Washington, to various cities and counties in those states, and to some private organizations. Total cost of collection and study of basic data during fiscal year was $404,073. That sum was spent for dam inspection program, $181,344; dam inventory, $7,688; flood plain management services, $81,041; and technical services, $134,000. 39-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 22. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT A cooperative research program between the Walla Walla District and the Waterways Experiment Station is being conducted as part of a natioh-wide survey to investigate the effects of fluctuating water levels upon riparian shorelines and vegetation. An experimental pond, which approximates the proposed worst-case conditions of peaking on McNary Reservoir through the use of pumps, automatic timers, and water control gates, and two shoreline plots in the reservoir itself are the test sites used for the plantings. Through this research species are being identified which can be expected to survive various periods of flooding. Species which produce cover at the water's edge, and woody species which can survive the periods of flooding are still under investigation. The effects of winter ice damage have also been considered with stable and fluctuating pool levels. In the control pool with stable water levels minimal ice damage occurred, whereas many plants were uprooted and destroyed by ice forming at the edge of the fluctuating water surface. McNary Lock and Dam, Lake Wallula, has also been designated a Recreation Research and Demonstration Unit under agreement with the Waterways Experiment Station. Two research units have been completed to date: Recreation Carrying Capacity, Design and Management and a study on the Methodology to Determine Concessionaire Opportunity. A Campground Use Monitoring Study is currently underway. In FY 1981 the Walla Walla District combined previous independent efforts with the Waterways Experiment Station in studies on Thermal Stress. This cooperative program will develop a series of computer programs and mathematical models to evaluate the generation of internal heat in mass concrete structures both during and after hydration, as well as the internal stresses caused by the thermal changes. The study will include new developments in modeling techniques and boundary conditions to determine the applications to: creep modeling, stress relocation methods, and determinants of concrete material properties at early stages. Data from this study has been incorporated in the design of Willow Creek Dam. 39-8 WALLA WALLA, WASH., DISTRICT TABLE 39-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to In Text Project Funding FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 Sep. 30, 1981 6. Lucky Peak Lake, Idaho 7. Mill Creek Lake, Wash. 8. Willow Creek Lake, Oreg. 10. Dworshak Dam and Reservoir, Idaho 11. Ice Harbor Lock and Dam, Wash. 12. Lewiston-Clarkston Bridge, Idaho 13. Little Goose Lock and Dam, Wash. 14. Lower Granite Lock and Dam, Wash. 15. Lower Monumental Lock and Dam Wash. New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost - 50,000 - 49,961 406,000 389,000 413,837 399,478 436,500 506,140 3,2 3, 3,1 3,2 6 2,3 2,4 55 6,9 6,8 3,0 3,C 10,0 10,1 2,7 2,8 19,3 19,3 2,4 2,5 7' 7' - 3' - 3' 290,000 4,7 382,258 4,7 179,200 3,1' 201,492 3,1 383,000 1,5( 52,845 1,5( 302,500 2,9 142,709 2,9 145,000 81 140,969 84 )06,483 3,21 391,559 3,3 )70,000 2,0 )97,058 2,0: )25,517 5,8: 66,143 5,9( 769,400 2,2 364,329 2,2 360,000 3,1 334,751 3,1 197,600 1,7( i17,347 1,6 35,000 15,797 495,700 451,111 75,400 196,900 73,744 196,946 - 473,830 - 465,524 73,100 1,778,275 72,662 1,423,064 20,700 7,618,000 22,655 7,204,811 26,200 3,629,100 28,900 3,584,353 67,200 2,126,000 67,782 2,047,262 37,700 3,117,100 49,302 2,677,636 80,000 6,535,000 69,359 6,521,804 31,000 2,569,600 22,622 2,348,876 29,900 2,318,800 16,697 2,142,940 77,100 3,905,1395 05,756 3,491,903 90,500 2,811,100 96,935 2,612,169 56,400 1,367,300 93,911 1,363,277 08,800 3,398,000 93,972 3,230,045 66 22 6,3 6,3 5,2 5,5 4,6 4,7 3,9 3,8 99 2,9 3,2 9,0 8,6 2,0 1,7 2,4, 2,5 3,7; 4,01 3,3 3,3' 21 2: 2,1' 2,1 - 19,580,681' 19,242 19,580,6811 41,500 5,695,704 ;53,207 5,659,744 - 2,230,6012 - 2,230,6012 20,140 4,762,749 i15,360 4,756,313 82,000 6,855,830 13,198 6,778,722 83,000 8,125,574 43,180 8,030,104 16,000 317,024,1963 29,546 316,712,8233 11,700 24,583,3694 79,789 24,499,3124 72,000 166,963,9455 51,132 166,862,8546 53,000 28,701,3497 16,745 28,492,1507 50,000 17,010,000 32,959 16,565,091 95,850 219,793,5268 79,273 219,254,2569 47,360 17,938,473 28,912 17,820,596 24,000 362,373,64510 63,602 362,294,656" 50,000 14,657,862 72,373 14,461,579 61,150 236,358,21112 21,243 236,308,90613 73,000 17,142,391 43,387 16,918,522 39-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 39-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (continued) See Section Total Cost to In Text Project Funding FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 Sep. 30, 1981 16. Lower Snake Fish New Work & Wildlife Approp. 1,560,000 6,480,000 4,538,600 14,811,000 27,389,600 Compensation, Idaho, Cost 1,558,244 6,481,737 3,663,819 15,030,546 26,734,345 Oreg. & Wash. 17. McNary Lock & New Work Dam-Lake Wallula Approp. 4,233,000 3,456,700 7,665,000 8,126,000 320,717,48614 Oreg. & Wash. Cost 4,443,220 3,534,504 7,534,824 6,531,897 318,990,30415 Maint. Approp. 4,438,800 4,457,200 6,386,600 6,229,200 70,186,07616 Cost 4,672,075 4,461,398 5,258,598 7,009,520 69,793,51516 18. Snake River Down- New Work stream from Johnson Approp. 36,975,000 13,881,700 9,968,295 7,053,000 985,924,09017 Bar Landing, Oreg., Cost 37,245,298 13,990,071 9,251,318 7,015,246 985,155,43417 Wash. & Idaho Maint. Approp. 10,644,500 8,981,900 11,663,000 10,943,360 78,887,89918 Cost 10,926,920 8,971,919 10,677,118 11,274,502 78,130,05319 1. Includes$499,431 appropriatedandexpendedforCode710,RecreationFacilitiesat contributed funds on lock and dam project. Completed Projects. 12. Includes $51,645.850 appropriated for additional units 4 through 6. 2. Excludes $80,000 contributed funds, but includes $68,446 appropriated and 13. Includes $51.596.544 expended for additional units 4 through 6. expended for Code 710, Recreation Facilities at Completed Projects. 14. Includes$1.427.986appropriated forCode710. Recreation FacilitiesatCompleted 3. Includes $2,046,100 regular project construction funds appropriated for and Projects. Excludes $3,069 for navigation channel (Section 107). expended by Department of Interior in Fiscal Years 1969 through 1972 for hatchery 15. Includes $1.426.410 expended for Code 710. Recreation Facilities at Completed operations.Includes$715,000appropriated and $712,585expended for additional unit. Projects. 4. Includes$9,708,000regularprojectoperationandmaintenancefundsappropriated 16. Includes$64.980allottedandexpended under Special Recreation Use Fees and forandexpendedbyDepartmentofInteriorstartingFY 1972forhatcheryoperations. $733.237 allotted and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Includes $28,600 allotted and expended under Special Recreation Use Fees. Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. 5. Includes $713,150 appropriated for Code 710, Recreation Facilities at Completed 17. Includes $400150 for new work on previous projects (Pasco to Lewiston), and Projects. Excludes $82,500 contributed for artificial spawning channel. Includes $34,613 for new work appropriation used for mainte'ance prior to 1953. Excludes $36,672,316 appropriated for additional units 4 through 6. $167.500 contributed funds for new work consisting of $85.000 for previous projects 6. Includes $713,150 expended for Code 710, Recreation Facilities at Completed (Pasco to Riparia), plus $82.500 for new work on existing artificial spawningchannel. Projects. Includes $36,571,225 expended for additional units 4 through 6. 18. Includes $186.570 appropriated for maintenance on previous projects (Pasco to 7. Includes $41,200 allotted and expended under Special Recreation Use Fees. Lewiston) and $261.254 open river Pasco to Lewiston and Lewiston to Johnson Bar 8. Includes $59,380,311 appropriated for additional units 4 through 6. Landing. 9. Includes $58,841,041 expended for additional units 4 through 6. 19. Includes $186,570 expended for maintenance on previous projects (Pasco to 10. Includes $46,211,511 appropriated for additional units 4 through 6. Lewiston) and $250.636 open river Pasco to Lewiston and Lewiston to Johnson Bar 11. Includes$46,211,511expendedforadditional units4through6. Excludes$405,819 Landing. 39-10 WALLA WALLA, WASH., DISTRICT TABLE 39-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents May 17, 1950 July 24, 1946 Oct. 22, 1976 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended June 28, 1938 Aug. 18, 1941 Oct. 27, 1965 July 3, 1958 Oct. 23, 1962 COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN, LOCAL FLOOD PROTECTION PROJECTS (See Section 2 of Text) Blackfoot Area, Snake River, Idaho. Levee left bank. Blackfoot River, Idaho. Levees, channel improvement, and and rectification works. Boise Valley, Boise River, Idaho, Channel improvement and enlargement, levees, and revetments in Ada County. Canyon County unit was deauthorized April 18, 1967. Grande Ronde Valley, Oreg. Levees and channel clearing, straightening, and realignment; would complement stream regulation by upstream storage projects. Heise-Roberts Extension, Snake River, Idaho. Channel clearing and rectification, levees, and bank protection. Kendrick, Potlatch River, Idaho. Revetted levee. Malheur River, Oreg. Channel rectification, levees, and bank protection at Vale. Willow Creek unit was deauthorized October 14, 1969. Palouse River, Wash. Flood protection for urban and rural areas at Garfield and near Malden. Payette Valley, Idaho. Channel rectification, levees, and bank protection along 38 miles of Payette River below Black Canyon Dam. Payette Valley was deauthorized 3 October 1978. Portneuf River and Marsh Creek, Idaho. Concrete-lined channel through Pocatello. Inkom-Marsh Creek unit was deauthorized October 14, 1969. Shelley Area, Snake River, Idaho. Bank protection. Weiser River, Weiser Area, Idaho. Intermittent channel realignment and improvement, levees, and bank protection, lower river area. LUCKY PEAK LAKE, IDAHO (See Section 6 of Text) Dam for flood control, irrigation, and recreation. Second outlet for streamflow maintenance. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. MILL CREEK LAKE, WALLA WALLA, WASH. (See Section 7 of Text) Off-stream storage project upstream from Walla Walla. Channel improvement through Walla Walla; concrete-lined channel. WILLOW CREEK LAKE, OREG. (See Section 8 of Text) Storage project for flood control, recreation, and fish and wildlife. (BRUCES EDDY) DWORSHAK DAM AND RESERVOIR, IDAHO (See Section 10 of Text) Preparation of detailed plans. Bruces Eddy dam and reservoir for flood control, navigation, power, recreation, and area redevelopment. 39-11 H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. P.L. 526-79, Chief of Engineers Report dated May 13, 1946 P.L.94-587 Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 578, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 719, 76th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 233, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 51, 84th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 403, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 39-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (continued) Acts Work Authorized Documents Aug. 15, 1963 Mar. 2, 1945 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended. Oct. 22, 1976 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Oct. 22, 1976 Mar. 2, 1945 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended June 13, 1902 June 25, 1910 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 Redesignation of project as Dworshak Dam and Reservoir. ICE HARBOR LOCK AND DAM-LAKE SACAJAWEAWASH. (See Section 11 of Text) Unit 1 of 4, Lower Snake River project, Lock and dam for navigation, power, recreation, and irrigation. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. LEWISTON-CLARKSTON BRIDGE, IDAHO & WASH. (See Section 12 of Text) Four lane highway bridge and approaches. LITTLE GOOSE LOCK AND DAM-LAKE BRYANWASH. (See Section 13 of Text) Unit 3 of 4, Lower Snake River project. Lock and dam for navigation, power, recreation, and irrigation. LOWER GRANITE LOCK AND DAM, WASH. (See Section 14 of Text) Unit 4 of 4, Lower Snake River project. Lock and dam for navigation, power, recreation, and irrigation. LOWER MONUMENTAL LOCK AND DAM, WASH. (See Section 15 of Text) Unit 2 of 4, Lower Snake River project. Lock and dam for navigation, power, recreation, and irrigation. LOWER SNAKE RIVER FISH & WILDLIFE COMPENSATION PLAN, WASH., OREG., IDAHO (See Section 16 of Text) Fish hatcheries and replacement of wildlife habitat. McNARY LOCK AND DAM-LAKE WALLULA--OREG. & WASH. (See Section 17 of Text) Lock and dam for navigation, power, recreation, and irrigation. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. SNAKE RIVER MOUTH TO JOHNSON BAR, WASH. & IDAHO (See Section 18 of Text) Open-river navigation. Riparia to Pittsburg Landing. Mouth to Riparia. Pittsburg Landing to Johnson Bar. Supersedes previous legislation mouth to Lewiston, Idaho, only. See Ice Harbor, Lower Monumental, Little Goose, and Lower Granite Locks and Dams. 39-12 P.L.88-96 H. Doc. 704, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 P.L. 94-587 H. Doc. 704, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 704, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 704, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. P.L. 94-587 H. Doc. 704, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doec. 127, 56th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 411, 55th Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doec. 25, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doec. 704, 75th Cong., 2d Sess. WALLA WALLA WASH., DISTRICT TABLE 39-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1981 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Columbia River and Tributaries above Celilo Falls to Kennewick, Wash.1 1968 1,851,195 1,108,259 1. Obviated by The Dalles, John Day, and McNary Projects. TABLE 39-D COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN, LOCAL, FLOOD PROTECTION PROJECTS (See Section 2 of Text) Estimated Status Sep. 30, 1981 Federal Project Cost Appropriated Cost Blackfoot Area, Snake River, Idaho ' 2 42,796 42,796 Blackfoot River, Idaho ' 2 391,143 391,143 Boise Valley, Idaho' Ada County Unit 3 4 1,060,000 46,084 46,084 Grande Ronde Valley, Oreg. 14 8,639,000 102,458 102,458 Heise-Roberts Extension, Idaho ' Henrys Fork Unit 4 - 27,800 27,800 Snake River Unit 2 3,375,158 3,375,158 Kendrick, Potlatch River, Idaho' 2 59,942 59,942 Lower Walla Walla River, Wash. - 4,000 4,000 Malheur River, Oreg. Vale Unit 1' 2 325,581 325,581 Mill Creek, Wash. 9 - 3,537 3,537 Mud Lake Area, Idaho 6 - 5,996 5,996 Palouse River, Wash. 4 914,000 - - Payette Valley, Idaho' - 23,178 23,178 Portneuf River and Marsh Creek, Idaho' Pocatello Unit 2 6,456,032 6,456,032 5 Shelley Area, Snake River, Idaho ' 2 32,335 32,335 South Fork Clearwater River, Idaho6 - 3,899 3,899 Teton River, Idaho - 10,387 10,387 Touchet River, Wash. - 11,198 11,198 Weiser River, Idaho' 4 1,565,000 112,757 112,757 7 Whitebird Creek, Idaho6 - 1,896 1,896 TOTAL 11,036,177 11,036,177 1. See Table 39-F. 5. Exclusive of $36,800 contributed funds. 2. Completed Project. 6. Inactive. 3. Economic justification of work proposed has been established in compliance 7. Includes $75,000 spent on unfeasible Cambridge and Midvale areas. with conditions set forth in Flood Control Act of 1950. 8. Deauthorized 3 October 1978. 4. Deferred for restudy. 9. Deauthorized 5 August 1977. 39-13 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 39-E INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 3 of Text) Bear Creek, Kendrick, Idaho Blackfoot, Blackfoot River, Idaho Camp Wooten, Tucannon River, Wash. Carey, Little Wood River, Idaho Colfax, Palouse River, Wash. Culdesac, Lapwai Creek, Idaho Dayton, Touchet River, Wash. Esquatzel, Coulee, Wash. Ferry Butte, Snake River, Idaho Gooding Area, Little Wood River, Idaho Heise-Roberts Area, Snake River, Idaho Heise-Roberts Extension, Snake River, Idaho Jackson Hole, Snake River, Wyo. Link Location, Boise River, Idaho Lower Dry Creek, Lowden, Wash. Lyman, Lyman Creek, Idaho Malheur Improvement District, Snake River, Oreg. Milton-Freewater, Walla Walla River, Oreg. Mission Creek, Idaho Pocatello, Portneuf River, Idaho Shelley Area, Snake River, Idaho Tomanovich-Salmon City, Salmon River, Idaho Vale, Malheur River, Oreg. Walla Walla, Mill Creek, Wash. West Richland, Yakima River, Wash. January 1981 October 1980 September 1981 August 1981 July 1981 January 1981 February 1981 January 1981 August 1981 August 1981 August 1981 August 1981 August 1981 February 1981 February 1981 August 1981 July 1981 May 1981 January 1981 October 1980 August 1981 October 1980 October 1980 September 1981 July 1981 TABLE 39-F OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 4 of Text) For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1981 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Bear Creek, Kendrick, Idaho 1 2 1970 133,518 Blackfoot Area, Snake River, Columbia River Basin, Idaho 1 1958 42,796 - Blackfoot Reservoir, Idaho 7 1980 267,626 - Blackfoot River, Columbia River Basin, Idaho 1 1965 391,143 - Boise Valley, Columbia River Basin, Idaho 1967 (a) Ada County Unit s 46,084 - Catherine Creek Lake, Oreg. 3 1978 1,552,000 - Colfax, Palouse River, Wash. 1 1966 5,557,240 - Cottonwood Creek Dam, Boise, Idaho 1973 183,100 - 39-14 WALLA WALLA, WASH., DISTRICT TABLE 39-F OTHER AUTHORIZED (continued) FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 4 of Text) For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1981 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Dayton, Touchet River, Wash. 1 1966 380,617 - Esquatzel Coulee, Connell, Wash. 12 1967 292,792 - Gooding Area, Idaho 1 2 1954 59,167 - Grande Ronde Lake, Oreg. S 1966 Grande Ronde Valley, Columbia River Basin, Oreg. 3 1958 102,458 - Heise-Roberts Area, Snake River, Idaho ' 1955 1,575,838 - Heise-Roberts Extension, Columbia River Basin, Idaho 1968 (a) Henrys Fork Unit 3 27,800 - (b) Snake River Unit 1 3,375,158 - Jackson Hole, Snake River, Wyo. 1 1978 2,388,270 - Kendrick, Potlatch River, Columbia River Basin, Idaho 1 1960 59,942 - Lapwai Creek, Culdesac, Idaho ' 2 1972 176,833 - Lewiston Levees 4 1950 - - Lower Dry Creek, Lowden, Wash. 12 1961 402,018 - Lyman Creek; Idaho 12 1971 230,315 - Malheur Improvement District, Snake River, Oreg. 1 1957 55,894 - Malheur River, Columbia River Basin, Oreg. 1961 (a) Vale Unit ' 325,580 - Milton-Freewater, Walla Walla River, Oreg.' 1968 2,337,628 5 - Mission and Lapwai Creeks, Idaho' 2 1965 54,538 - Portneuf River and Marsh Creek, Columbia River Basin, Idaho 1969 (a) Pocatello Unit 1 6,456,032 - Pullman, Palouse, Wash. 3 1964 99,540 - Ririe Lake, Idaho 1 1980 39,715,701 - Shelley Area, Snake River, Columbia River Basin, Idaho ' 1958 32,335 - Stuart Gulch Dam, Boise, Idaho 9 1974 234,100 - Tomanovich-Salmon City, Idaho 1 2 1955 128,635 - Tucannon River, Camp Wooten, Wash. 1 2 1971 73,932 Weiser River, Columbia River Basin, Idaho 3 1960 112,757 6 - Yakima River, West Richland, Wash. 12 1964 238,890 8 Zintel Canyon Dam, Wash. 1980 400,046 - 1. Completed project. 5. Exclusive of $6,300 contributed funds. Includes $550,875 spent under Public 2. Authorized by Chief of Engineers. Law 99 authority. 3. Deferred for restudy. 6. Includes an estimated $75,000 spent for planning on unfeasible areas. 4. Withdrawn as a local flood protection project in June 1959. Included as a 7. Inactive. feature of Lower Granite Lock and Dam, Snake River, Washington. 8. Includes $9,000 contributed funds. 9. Deauthorized 17 May 1979. 39-15 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 39-G FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Section 5 of Text) Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as Amended (Preauthorization) Study Identification Fiscal Year Costs Farewell Bend, Weiser Vicinity, Idaho $ 441 Mill Slough, Middleton, Idaho 30,786 Snake River, Blackfoot, Idaho 743 Total $ 31,970 TABLE 39-H PRINCIPAL DATA CONCERNING NAVIGATION LOCK, SPILLWAY DAM, POWERPLANT, AND IMPOUNDMENT Project SPILLWAY DAM Dworshak Dam and Reservoir, Idaho (See Section 10 of Text) Type of Construction Completed Maximum Capacity Crest Elevation Control Gates: Type Size, Width by Height Number POWERPLANT Length Generating Units: Number Installed Space for Additional Rating, Each Total Capacity Installed Total Potential Capacity Maximim Structural Height First Power-On-Line IMPOUNDMENT Elevations: Normal Operating Range Maximum Flood Control Storage Lake Length Lake Water Surface Area at Elevation 1600 Length of Shoreline Concrete Gravity September 1974 150,500 Cubic Feet Per Second 1613 Feet Tainter 50 Ft. by 55 Ft. 2 428 Feet 3 3 2 @ 90,000 kw; 4 @ 220,000 kw 400,000 kw 1,060,000 kw 150 Feet March 1973 1600-1445 Feet 1605 Feet 2,000,000 Ac.-Ft. 53 Miles 17,090 Acres 175 Miles 39-16 'WALLA WALLA, WASH., DISTRICT TABLE 39-H PRINCIPAL DATA CONCERNING NAVIGATION (continued) LOCK, SPILLWAY DAM, POWERPLANT, AND IMPOUNDMENT Project Ice Harbor Lock and Dam, Wash. (See Section 11 of Text) Little Goose Lock and Dam, Wash. (See Section 13 of Text) NAVIGATION LOCK Clear Width Clear Length Lift: Minimum Average Maximum Minimum Water Depth Over Sills Opened to Navigation SPILLWAY DAM Type of Construction Completed Maximum Capacity Crest Elevation Control Gates: Type Size, Width by Height Number POWERPLANT Length Generating Units: Number Installed Rating, Each Total Installed Capacity Maximum Structural Height First Power-On-Line IMPOUNDMENT Elevations: Normal Operating Range Maximum Lake Length Lake Water Surface Area at Elevation 440 Navigation Channel, Depth by Width Length of Shoreline NAVIGATION LOCK Clear Width Clear Length Lift: Minimum Average Maximum Minimum Water Depth Over Sills Opened to Navigation SPILLWAY DAM Type of Construction Completed Maximum Capacity Crest Elevation Control Gates: Type Size, Width by Height Number 86 Feet. 675 Feet 97 Feet 100 Feet 103 Feet 15 Feet May 1962 Concrete Gravity January 1962 850,000 cfs 391 Feet Tainter 50 Ft. by 51 Ft. 10 671 Feet 6 3 @ 90,000 kw; 3 @ 111,000 kw 603,000 kw 226 Feet December 1961 440-437 Feet 446 Feet 31.9 Miles 9,200 Acres 14 Ft. by 250 Ft. 80 Miles 86 Feet 675 Feet 93 Feet 98 Feet 101 Feet 15 Feet May 1970 Concrete Gravity January 1970 850,000 cfs 581 Feet Tainter 50 Ft. by 60 Ft. 8 39-17 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 39-H PRINCIPAL DATA CONCERNING NAVIGATION (continued) LOCK, SPILLWAY DAM, POWERPLANT, AND IMPOUNDMENT Project POWERPLANT Lower Granite Lock and Dam, Wash. (See Section 14 of Text) Lower Monumental Lock and Dam, Wash. (See Section 15 of Text) Length Width Generating Units: Number Installed Rating, Each Total Installed Capacity Maximum Structural Height First Power-On-Line IMPOUNDMENT Elevations: Normal Operating Range Maximum Lake Length Lake Water Surface Area at Elevation 638 Navigation Channel, Depth by Width Length of Shoreline NAVIGATION LOCK Clear Width Clear Length Lift: Minimum Average Maximum Mininum Water Depth Over Sills SPILLWAY DAM Type of Construction Completed Maximum Capacity Crest Elevation Control Gates: Type Size, Width by Height Number POWERPLANT Length Width Generating Units: Number Installed Rating, Each Total Capacity Installed Maximum Structural Height First Power-On-Line IMPOUNDMENT Elevations: Normal Operating Range Maximum Lake Length Lake Water Surface Area at Elevation 738 Navigation Channel, Depth by Width Length of Shoreline NAVIGATION LOCK Clear Width Clear Length Lift: Minimum 656 Feet 243 Feet 6 135,000 kw 810,000 kw 244 Feet March 1970 638-633 Feet 646.5 Feet 37.2 Miles 10,025 Acres 14 Ft. by 250 Ft. 92 Miles 86 Feet 675 Feet 95 Feet 100 Feet 105 Feet 15 Feet Concrete Gravity February 1975 850,000 cfs 581 Feet Tainter 50 Ft. by 60.5 Ft. 8 656 Feet 243 Feet 6 135,000 kw 810,000 kw 246 Feet April 1975 738-733 Feet 746.5 Feet 38 Miles 8,900 Acres 14 Ft. by 250 Ft. 91 Miles 86 Feet 675 Feet 97 Feet 39-18 WALLA WALLA, WASH., DISTRICT TABLE 39-H PRINCIPAL DATA CONCERNING NAVIGATION (continued) LOCK, SPILLWAY DAM, POWERPLANT, AND IMPOUNDMENT Project McNary Lock and Dam, Oreg. and Wash. (See Section 17 of Text) Average Maximum Minimum Water Depth Over Sills Opened to Navigation SPILLWAY DAM Type of Construction Completed Maximum Capacity Crest Elevation Control Gates: Type Size, Width by Height Number POWERPLANT Length Width Generating Units: Number Installed Rating, Each Total Installed Capacity Maximum Structural Height First Power-On-Line IMPOUNDMENT Elevation: Normal Operating Range Maximum Lake Length Lake Water Surface Area at Elevation 540 Navigation Channel, Depth by Width Length of Shoreline NAVIGATION LOCK Clear Width Clear Length Lift: Minimum Average Maximum Minimum Water Depth Over Sills Opened to Navigation SPILLWAY DAM Type of Construction Completed Maximum Capacity Crest Elevation Control Gates: Type Size, Width by Height Number POWERPLANT Length Width Generating Units Number Installed Rating, Each Total Installed Capacity 98 Feet 103 Feet 15 Feet April 1969 Concrete Gravity March 1969 850,000 cfs 483 Feet Tainter 50 Ft. by 61 Ft. 8 656 Feet 243 Feet 6 135,000 kw 810,000 kw 242 Feet May 1969 540-537 Feet 548 Feet 28.7 Miles 6,590 Acres 14 Ft. by 250 Ft. 78 Miles 86 Feet 675 Feet 67 Feet 75 Feet 92 Feet 15 Feet November 1953 Concrete Gravity October 1953 2,200,000 cfs 291 Feet Vertical Lift 50 Ft. by 51 Ft. 22 1,348 Feet 241 Feet 14 70,000 kw 980,00 kw 39-19 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 39-H PRINCIPAL DATA CONCERNING NAVIGATION (continued) LOCK, SPILLWAY DAM, POWERPLANT, AND IMPOUNDMENT Project Maximum Structural Height 193 Feet First Power-On-Line November 1953 IMPOUNDMENT Elevations: Normal Operating Range 340-335 Feet Maximum 356.5 Feet Lake Length 64 miles Lake Water Surface Area at Elevation 340 38,800 Acres Navigation Channel, Depth by Width 14 Ft. by 250 Ft. Length of Shoreline 242 Miles TABLE 39-I SNAKE RIVER DOWNSTREAM FROM JOHNSON BAR LANDING, OREG., WASH., AND IDAHO (See Section 18 of Text) Estimated Cost (Corps New Work Maintenance Percent of Engineers to Sep. 30, 1981 to Sep. 1981 Com- Constr. Project Funds Only) Approp. Cost Approp. Cost pleted Started Ice Harbor Lock & Dam Code 710 Recreation Facilities 1,645,000 713,150 713,150 - - 43 FY 57 Power Units 4-6 36,672,316 36,672,316 36,571,225 - - 99 FY 71 Totals 167,895,795 166,963,945 166,862,854 28,701,349 28,492,150 99 Little Goose Lock & Dam Initial Project 160,413,215 160,413,215 160,413,215 17,938,473 17,820,596 100 FY 63 Power Units 4-6 59,680,311 59,380,311 58,841,041 - - 99 FY 74 Totals 220,093,526 219,793,526 219,254,256 17,938,473 17,820,596 99 Lower Granite Lock & Dam Initial Project 319,600,000 316,162,134 316,083,145 14,657,862 14,461,579 98 FY 65 Power Units 4-6 46,211,511 46,211,511 46,211,511 - - 100 FY 74 Totals 365,811,511 362,373,645 362,294,656 14,657,862 14,461,579 98 Lower Monumental Lock & Dam Initial Project 184,712,361 184,712,361 184,712,361 17,142,391 16,918,522 100 FY 61 Power Units 4-6 51,645,850 51,645,850 51,596,544 - - 100 FY 75 Totals 236,358,211 236,358,211 236,308,905 17,142,391 16,918,522 100 Open River Lewiston to Johnson Bar Landing 34,613 34,6131 34,6131 256,904 246,286 39-20 WALLA WALLA, WASH., DISTRICT TABLE 39-I SNAKE RIVER DOWNSTREAM FROM (continued) JOHNSON BAR LANDING, OREG., WASH., AND IDAHO (See Section 18 of Text) Estimated Cost (Corps New Work Maintenance Percent of Engineers to Sep. 30, 1981 to Sep. 30, 1980 Corn- Constr. Project Funds Only) Approp. Cost Approp. Cost pleted Started Open River Pasco to Lewiston - - - 4,350 4,350 Totals Existing Project 990,193,656 985,523,940 984,755,284 78,701,329 77,943,483 99 Previous Projects Pasco to Lewiston 400,150 400,150 400,150 186,570 186,570 Totals Authorized Project 990,593,806 985,924,090 985,155,434 78,887,899 78,130.053 1. New work appropriations used for maintenance prior to 1953. TABLE 39-J OTHER AUTHORIZED MULTIPLE-PURPOSE PROJECTS, INCLUDING POWER (See Section 19 of Text) For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1981 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Asotin Dam, Snake River, Idaho and Wash. 1 1964 - - McNary Second Powerhouse, Oreg. and Wash.2 1980 1,275,000 1. Project was deauthorized by P.L. 94-199, Section 5, on 31 December 1975. 2. Authorized Phase I 39-21 ALASKA DISTRICT* This District consists of the State of Alaska. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Channels and Harbors Page 1. Anchorage Harbor, Alaska ....................... 40-1 2. Bar Point Harbor, Alaska ............... ..... 40-2 3. Cordova Small Boat Harbor, Alaska ............ 40-2 4. Craig Small Boat Harbor, Alaska ............. 40-2 5. Dillingham Harbor, Alaska .................. 40-2 6. Homer Harbor, Alaska ... ................. 40-3 7. Hoonah Harbor, Alaska ... ................. 40-3 8. Kake Harbor, Alaska .................. .... 40-3 9. Metlakatla Harbor, Alaska .................. 40-4 10. Ninilchik Harbor, Alaska .................... 40-4 11. Nome Harbor, Alaska .... .................... 40-5 12. Port Lions Small Boat Harbor, Alaska .......... 40-5 13. Stikine River, Alaska ............................ 40-5 14. Other Authorized Navigation Projects ............ 40-6 15. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ................................... 40-6 Beach Erosion Control 16. Beach Erosion Control Under Special Authorization ............................ 40-6 17. 18. 19. 20. Flood Control Local Protection Page Talkeetna River, Alaska ........................ .. 40-6 Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ... .................... 40-6 Other Authorized Flood Control Projects .. ........... ......... 40-6 Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ...................... 40-6 Reservoirs 21. Chena River Lakes, Alaska ...................... 40-6 Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 22. Bradley Lake, Alaska ............................ 40-7 23. Snettisham, Alaska ... ..................... 40-7 General Investigations 24. 25. 26. Surveys .............. .................. 40-7 Collection and Study of Basic Data ................................ 40-7 Research and Development ....................... 40-7 Navigation Channels and Harbors 1. ANCHORAGE HARBOR, ALASKA Location. Anchorage is in southcentral Alaskaon the southeast shore of Knik Arm, north of Turnagain Arm near its junction with Cook Inlet. (See NOAA Charts 16660 and 16664.) Existing project. Provides for dredging along a 3,000 foot baseline adjacent to the Port of Anchorage dock to a depth of 35 feet below mean lower low water. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 29.0 feet and the extreme range is 42.0 feet. (See Table 40-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. The Port of Anchorage facility consists of a POL terminal at the southern end and three general cargo terminals northward. The northernmost terminal, completed during 1976 and 1977 was outside the Federal project limits. Extension of limits from 2,070 feet northward to 3,000 feet was authorized by Public Law 94-587, and funded in FY 1978. *All cost and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. Operations and results during fiscal year. Regular funds, maintenance: The fiscal year 1981 maintenance dredging contract was awarded in May 1981 and 414,200 cubic yards of material were removed by the contractor. Due to unprecedented shoaling during the season, the U.S. hopper dredge Biddle was brought up from Portland to assist in dredging the harbor. Through agitation dredging the Biddle removed approximately 479,900 cubic yards. Total material removed from harbor in FY 1981 was 894,100 cubic yards. Condition at end of fiscal year. Dredging was accomplished jointly by local interests and United States Army to provide a depth of 35 feet alongside the newly constructed City Dock and 32 feet at a distance of 50 feet from Ocean Dock in July 1961; city and Army funds were used. Ocean Dock was destroyed in the March 27, 1964earthquake. Emergency dredgingwas performed at City Dock July and August 1965. The first phase of new work in the authorized project, consisting of dredging the port area to a depth of 35 feet, was accomplished October 1966 through June 1967. Duringthedesign stage, the project basin All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 40-1 I I REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 was modified to match City Dock, including expansion then underway. By contract, the city completed dredging of Terminal No. 3 (north of Federal limits) to a depth of 35 feet. Terminal No. 3 was incorporated into Federal Limits during 1978. Maintenance dredging was accomplished across the entire project during 1981 with the area adjacent to the dock face dredged to the authorized depth of -35 feet mean lower low water and the remainder varying between -35 and -41 feet mean lower low water. 2. BAR POINT HARBOR, ALASKA Location. On coast of Revillagigedo Island, on northeasterly side on Tongass Narrows. Ketchikan is approximately 220 nautical miles southeast of Juneau, Alaska. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 8075, 8094, and 8095.) Existing project. As originally authorized and constructed, Bar Point Basin consisted of a 780,000 square foot basin at depths of 10 and 15 feet below mean lower low water, protected by three rock breakwaters. An additional 25 acres protected by a 960-foot long floating breakwater has been added and the State of Alaska is in the process of adding additional floats to this area. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 15.3 feet, with an extreme range of 26 feet. (See Table 40-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Publicly owned facilities are four smallboat floats, including two in project basins, and two ferry docks. Privately owned facilities include two general cargo docks open to public use, one of which serves as a pasasenger terminal; three oil wharves, which include facilities for fueling small boats; and approximately 25 industrial wharves, piers, and floats. Additional facilities are available at Saxman and Ward Cove in the immediate area. One wharf is used exclusively for Government vessels. Operations and results during fiscal year. Regular funds, new work: Construction continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Work was initiated in April 1979 and, after repair of wind damaged floating breakwater, completed in April 1980 except for addition of whalers. The contract for this work was awarded 22 September 1981. 3. CORDOVA SMALL BOAT HARBOR, ALASKA Location. Cordova is on Orca Inlet, a strait near the eastern entrance of Prince William Sound, about 150 air miles south-southeast of Anchorage, Alaska. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 8520, 8525, and 8551.) Existing project. The Office of the Chief of Engineers approved construction of a harbor expansion from 8.26 acres to 20 acres by removal of the existing 1400 foot breakwater and construction of a new 2000 foot long breakwater. The entrance channel is dredged to -16 feet mean lower low water and the turning basin is dredged from -10 to -12 mean lower low water. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher water is 12.4 feet with an extreme range of 21.7 feet. The dredged material will be disposed of in two diked upper tidal areas which will be used as staging facilities. (See Table 40-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. Two municipal docks accommodate general cargo and passengers, including automobile ferry traffic. One privately owned wharf, reduced by fire, provides oil handling and bunkering facilities. Three privately owned wharves are used for industrial purposes. A small boat float system for public use is in original basin. State ferry dock in basin has been superseded by municipal dock and is inactive. Facilities are considered adequate for present commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Regular funds, new work: Contract awarded 15 May 1981 for construction of breakwater and diked disposal areas. Work is approximately 50 percent complete. Most of existing breakwater has been removed. Condition at end of fiscal year. Work was initiated in May 1981 and is scheduled for completion in December 1982. 4. CRAIG SMALL BOAT HARBOR, ALASKA Location. Craig is located on Craig Island, adjacent to Prince of Wales Island in southeastern Alaska, about 200 miles south of Juneau. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 8152 and 8155.) Existing project. The Office of the Chief of Engineers approved construction for navigation improvements at South Cove Harbor at Craig, Alaska on 19 February 1980. Improvements consisted of construction of two short rubblemound breakwaters, a 70-foot-long north breakwater and a 200-footlong south breakwater. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 10 feet, with an extreme range of 18 feet. (See Table 40-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Publicly owned facilities are one general cargo wharf and three small boat floats, including one in project basin. Privately owned facilities are two oil piers and several industrial wharves. One float is used by Government boats. Operations and results during fiscal year. Regular funds, new work: Contract was awarded for construction of two breakwaters on 8 April 1981. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was completed on 4 September 1981. A new contract to extend north breakwater 30 feet will be awarded in October 1981. 5. DILLINGHAM HARBOR, ALASKA Location. At head of Nushagak Bay, an arm of Bristol Bay, on right bank of Nushagak River just below its confluence with Wood River; about 470 miles northeasterly of Dutch Harbor and 300 miles southwest of Anchorage, Alaska. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 9052.) Existing project. A small-boat basin 230,000 square feet in area with a depth of 2 feet above mean lower low water along Scandinavian Creek; with entrance channel 1,100 feet long and 40 feet wide in Scandinavian Creek; and a sheet pile sill across the basin outlet with a top elevation of 7 feet above mean lower low water. During design stage the project was revised to include a rock sill with adjacent scour-protection blankets and the embankment was relocated to include a berm between the basin and the embankment. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 19.8 feet. Extreme range is 30.0 feet. (See Table 40-B for authorizing legislation.) 40-2 ALASKA DISTRICT Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Three docks at the city of Dillingham, all privately owned, and a publicly owned small-boat float in the project basin. Two docks are used for salmon-cannery operations; the third is an oil handling and bunkering terminal. Small-boat approach and floats were installed in small-boat basin in summer of 1963, and were demolished by winter ice movement. New floats were installed May 1971, and are removed before fall freezeup and replaced each spring. Cargo and passengers from ocean vessels are lightered from the anchorage just below Snag Point, and are unloaded at the docks or in the small-boat basin. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Regular funds, maintenance: Government plant and hired labor performed maintenance dredging from July through September 1981. 107,000 cubic yards of material were dredged this fiscal year. Condition at end of fiscal year. Maintenance dredging was accomplished across entire project to the authorized depth of +2 feet mean lower low water during 1981. 6. HOMER HARBOR, ALASKA Location. In Kachemak Bay, on Kenai Peninsula, 152 miles by water southwest of Anchorage. Harbor site is land based near the extremity of Homer Spit which varies to one-quarter mile in width and extends 4.5 miles southeasterly from the mainland. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 8554 and 8531.) Previous projects. See page 1593 of Annual Report for 1964. Existing project. Provides for sheltered small-boat harbor, relocated and based within Homer Spit about 10 acres in area, with a 2.75-acre berthing area 14 feet deep and a 7.25-acre anchorage area 15 feet deep, below mean lower low water; a north entrance channel; protected by a main rock breakwater 1,018 feet long and secondary rock breakwater 238 feet long. Tidal range between mean lower low and mean higher high water is 18.1 feet, with an extreme range of 30.4 feet. (See Table 40-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. One publicly owned and operated wharf capable of handling oceangoing vessels serves for passengers and general cargo. Small-boat facilities in basin area include publicly owned mooring floats, a publicly owned wharf, and an industrial wharf. A separate basin with unloading facilities for barges and small boats is being constructed by private interests. A detailed project report has been prepared recommending doubling the size of the harbor. The city of Homer is proposing to triple the size of its fish dock located at thd southern end of the harbor with construction scheduled for FY 1982. Operations and results during fiscal year. Regular funds, maintenance: During FY 1981, 13,100 cubic yards were removed by the Government-owned pipeline dredge Warren George. The material was disposed of in a low depression located on the southern tip of the spit. Condition at end of fiscal year. The harbor for the original project was started in September 1961, completed in June 1962 and essentially destroyed by the March 27, 1964 earthquake. Emergency repair work, which included raising the first leg of the breakwater, was accomplished July and August 1964. The harbor was restored by construction of an extension to the breakwater, removal of part of the original breakwater to form an entrance, removal of basin material inland, and disposal of the material to form a protective berm around the landward side of the basin. Restoration work began August 1964 and was completed March 1965. Expansion of the harbor began November 1964 and was completed March 1965. Local interests extended length of basin and protective berm by 700 feet in fiscal years 1968 to 1970, with supervision by the Corps to insure the integrity of the Federal project. Maintenance dredging of the entrance channel was completed in July 1981. A survey of the entrance channel during July 1981 indicated project depth was available throughout the Federal limits. 7. HOONAH HARBOR, ALASKA Location. Hoonah is located on the eastern shore of Port Frederick, a deep tidal fjord on the northeastern shore of Chichagof Island in southeastern Alaska. The city is 70 miles west of Juneau. (See National Geodetic Survey Charts 8202 and 8302.) Existing project. Consists of an authorized small-boat basin to be 16 acres in extent, and an entrance channel and turning basin; with the entrance channel 100 feet wide and 400 feet long (widening to 150 feet for 600 feet along the western edge of the basin) all to a depth of 18.5 feet below mean lower low water; three rubblemound breakwaters 140, 800 and 1,459 feet long; and one rubblemound diversion dike 1,165 feet long. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 14.8 feet. Extreme tidal range is 25 feet. Estimated project cost of the basin is $4,255,000 (October 1981), Corps of Engineers funds. (See Table 40-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Publicly owned facilities are two general cargo docks, a ferry dock and a small boat float attached to one of the cargo docks. Privately owned facilities are one oil dock and one industrial-oil dock. Facilities are not sufficient or suitable for moorage of more than a small portion of the resident and transient commercial fishing vessels operating at Hoonah. The constructed harbor will provide the necessary moorage. Operations and results during fiscal year. Regular funds, new work: Construction completed. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was initiated in June 1979 and completed in September 1980 but the contract is not yet fiscally completed due to a pending claim. 8. KAKE HARBOR, ALASKA Location. Kake Harbor is located in the city of Kake, on the northwest corner of Kupreanof Island in southeastern Alaska, 39 air miles west of Petersburg, Alaska, and 850 water miles northwesterly of Seattle, Washington. (See Coast and Geodetic Chart 8201.) Existing project. The authorized project consists of a 1,580-foot-long west breakwater and a 900-foot-long south breakwater, enclosing a 7-acre berthing area. Poor foundation conditions found during preconstruction investigations have forced modification of the project to include a 1,760-footlong west breakwater and a 1,750-foot-long south breakwater. Estimated project cost is $10,530,000 (October 1981), including $10,500,000 Corps of Engineers funds, $18,000 Coast Guard funds, and $12,000 non-Federal cost. Tidal range 40-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 14.0 feet with an extreme range of 22 feet. (See Table 40-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests are required to provide, without cost to the United States, all lands, easements, and rights-of-way required for construction and maintenance of the project and for aids to navigation; hold and save the United States free from damages that may result from the construction and maintenance of the project; provide and maintain, without cost to the United States, necessary mooring facilities and utilities including a public landing with suitable facilities open to all on equal terms; accomplish, without cost to the United States, such utility or other relocations or alterations as necessary for project purposes; and establish regulations concerning discharge of untreated sewage, garbage, and other pollutants in the waters of the harbor by the users thereof, which regulations shall be in accordance with applicable laws or regulations of Federal, State, and local authorities responsible for pollution prevention and control. The City of Kake, as project sponsor, has indicated a willingness and ability to provide the local cooperation requirements. Terminal facilities. At Kake, a publicly owned wharf with seaplane float for float equipped airplanes and shallow-draft vessels is located within area of proposed basin. At cannery 1 mile from city, there are two privately owned deep-draft piers: one for cargo, open to all local boat owners, the second for fuel, including afloat for fueling small boats. At Portage Cove, there is one publicly owned small-boat float. Facilities are not considered adequate for present commerce due to the following deficiencies in small-boat facilities: the complete lack of protection in the directions of the most severe storms; shallow water at Portage Cove float and its approaches; ice formation on the cove during the winter months causes major boat damage and limits the use of the mooring float; and transportation problems between city and present small-boat float at Portage Cove. Operations and results during fiscal year. Final design memorandum and environmental impact statement were completed and plans and specifications started in FY 1981. Condition at end of fiscal year. Finalization of plans and specifications is scheduled for FY 1982. 9. METLAKATLA HARBOR, ALASKA Location. Metlakatla is located in the southern portion of Port Chester, a small bay on the northwest coast of Annette Island in southeastern Alaska, 18 miles south of Ketchikan. (See Coast and Geodetic Charts 8074, 8075, and 8102.) Existing project. Consists of two small-boat basins. Existing basin is 2.18 acres in extent with a depth of 10 feet below mean lower low water, protected by a rubblemound breakwater 900 feet long. New basin consists of two rubblemound breakwaters, 1,255 and 1,150 feet long, and an entrance channel and maneuvering area, 1,100 feet long, 100 feet wide, dredged to a depth of 15 feet below mean lower low water and a basin area of 6.25 acres dredged to a depth of 15 feet below mean lower low water. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 14.7 feet, with an extreme range of 24 feet. Estimated project cost of proposed basin is $4,900,000 (October 1981) Corps of Engineers funds. (See Table 40-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with on existing basin. For the basin, local interests must provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and quarry rights required for construction and subsequent maintenance of the project and for aids to navigation upon the request of the Chief of Engineers; hold and save the United States free from damages that may result from the construction and maintenance of the project; provide and maintain without cost to the United States adequate berthing depths, surface area, and necessary mooring facilities and utilities, including a public landing with suitable supply facilities open to all on equal terms; accomplish without cost to the United States such utility or other relocations as necessary for project purposes; and establish regulations prohibiting discharge of pollutants into the waters of the harbor by users thereof, which regulations shall be in accordance with applicable laws or regulations of Federal, State, and local authorities responsible for pollution prevention and control. Terminal facilities. Publicly owned facilities are one general-cargo dock, one barge ramp, and a small-boat float system in existing basin. Privately owned facilities are one oil pier and one industrial wharf. Facilities are not adequate for mooring the commercial fishing vessels operating from Metlakatla. Existing protected harbor area is fully utilized. Operations and results during fiscal year. Regular funds, new work: Construction continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing basin was constructed April through June 1956. Construction of new work is essentially complete with some underwater removal of isolated rocks to be completed by December 1981. 10. NINILCHIK HARBOR, ALASKA Location. At mouth of Ninilchik River in Cook Inlet, at the community of Ninilchik, Alaska, about 40 miles upcoast from Homer and 112 miles southwest of Anchorage. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 8554.) Existing project. A small-boat basin 320 feet long by 150 feet wide dredged to elevation of 2 feet above mean lower low water, with an approach channel 400 feet long and 50 feet wide dredged to an elevation of 9 feet above mean lower low water; protected by a pile jetty 410 feet long. Project was modified in design stage to delete pile jetty and revise harbor dimensions to 400 feet long by 125 feet wide, and was completed in November 1961. Modification, including river channel diversion, two armor rock jetties, and beach protection, was accomplished 1967 and 1969. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 19.1 feet, with an extreme range of 33.5 feet. (See Table 40-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Facilities, limited to shallow-draft vessels and accessible from Cook Inlet only at half-tide or higher, are: a cannery dock along Ninilchik River available for offloading fish, and small-boat floats in project basin, provided by State of Alaska. Other supplies are landed on beach or brought by road from deep-draft ports in the vicinity. Facilities are extremely inadequate for the number of boats presently using harbor. Expansion of facilities would require construction of additional protected harbor area. Operations and results during fiscal year. Regular funds, maintenance: Maintenance dredging of the harbor and entrance channel was accomplished with 12,300 cubic yards removed in 1981. 40-4 ALASKA DISTRICT Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was initiated in October 1961 and completed in November 1961. Modifications to reduce sedimentation and prevent beach erosion on the seaward sandspit were completed November 1969. Emergency dredging was accomplished June 1970 and June 1971. Maintenance dredging has been accomplished annually since 1971. A survey of the basin during May 1981 indicated project depth was available throughout the Federal limits. 11. NOME HARBOR, ALASKA Location. At mouth of Snake River at the city of Nome Alaska, on northerly shore of Norton Sound, an arm of Bering Sea. It is a shallow open roadstead, 581 nautical miles north of Dutch Harbor and 545 air miles northwest of Anchorage. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 9302 and 9380.) Existing project. Provides for two jetties, the easterly 951 and the westerly not exceeding 676 feet long, at mouth of Snake River; a channel 8 feet deep at mean lower low water, 75 feet wide, from Norton Sound through Snake River to mouths of Bourbon and Dry Creeks, in city of Nome, ending in a turning basin of the same depth, 250 feet wide and 600 feet long; revetting banks of rivers; and protecting all existing waterfront improvements on easterly beach by means of rock-mound seawall 3,350 feet long extending easterly from east jetty. Project has been completed except extension of jetties beyond present 400 and 240 feet, which is classified inactive. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 1.6 feet and extreme tidal range is 7.5 feet, but water levels are influenced more by wind than tide. Levels of 5 feet below mean lower low water have been observed during offshore winds, and a level of 14 feet above mean lower low water has been observed during a southerly storm. (See Table 40-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Total actual costs for all requirements of local cooperation under terms of original project authorization are $2,500 annually. Local interests also maintain seawall. Terminal facilities. Cargoes and passengers from ocean vessels are lightered to and from shore a distance of about 2 miles. Traffic enters dredged channel and is handled over revetment, where lighterage company has transfer facilities which are open to the public. Facilities considered inadequate for existing commerce. The State of Alaska is conducting a study of the feasibility of constructing a causeway with unloading facilities and docking berths for deep draft vessels. If constructed, the proposal calls for modifying the existing harbor into a small boat basin requiring shallower draft. Operations and results during fiscal year. Regular funds, maintenance: Maintenance dredging by contract was accomplished throughout the ice-free season. 17,200 cubic yards were removed in FY 1981. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of original 335- and 460-foot jetties and revetments was completed in 1923. Reconstruction of jetties with concrete to modified length of 240 and 400 feet was completed in 1940. Dredging entrance channel and original 200- by 250-foot basin was completed in 1922. Construction of seawall was completed June 1951. Dredging 400-foot extension of basin was commenced in 1949 and was completed in 1951. Maintenance dredging is performed annually within the basin and throughout the entrance channel. Jetty repairs were made in 1954 and July through October 1965. 12. PORT LIONS SMALL BOAT HARBOR, ALASKA Location. Port Lions is located on the north end of Kodiak Island, approximately 19 air miles west of the city of Kodiak. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 8534.) Existing Project. The Office of the Chief of Engineers approved construction for a small boat harbor at Port Lions on 9 April 1979. Construction consists of a 600-foot-long breakwater, a 170-foot-long stub breakwater inclosing a 12-acre harbor. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 9.6 feet with an extreme range of 18 feet. (See Table 40-B for authorizing legislation). Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. A municipal timber pile dock at Port Wakefield serves as both a shallow-draft and deep-draft facility for Port Lions. Operations and results during fiscal year. Regular funds, new work: Contract was awarded for construction of a small boat harbor on 19 December 1980. Condition at end of fiscal year. Work was initiated in March 1981 and construction was completed on 21 July 1981. 13. STIKINE RIVER, ALASKA Location. Rises in northwestern Canada and flows southwesterly through Canada for about 200 miles, then about 30 miles westerly across Panhandle of Alaska to Sumner Strait. Mouth of river is on coast of mainland about 3 miles north of Wrangell. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 8201.) Existing project. Snagging Stikine River from its mouth for about 30 miles to Canadian border. The Canadian Government maintains that portion of the river between Alaskan border and Telegraph Creek, British Columbia, a distance of 130 miles. The head of navigation is at Telegraph Creek, B.C., about 160 miles above the mouth. No data is available concerning stages of high and low water in river. At mouth, tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 13.9 feet, and maximum range is about 25 feet. Tidal effects have been reported at a distance of 20 miles from the mouth. (See Table 40-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. None along Alaskan portion of river. Vessels operating on Stikine River are dependent on terminal facilities at Wrangell Harbor. Facilities include a city operated pier for general cargo and passengers; two publicly operated small-boat mooring floats; two privately operated small-boat fueling floats; a State of Alaska Ferry Pier, and three industrial wharves. Operations and results during fiscal year. Regular funds, maintenance: Memorandum of Understanding between Corps and Forest Service, signed August 1972, provided for Forest Service personnel to do project clearing. However, due to environmental restraints, no work was accomplished until 1977 after completion of an environmental assessment. The work has been accomplished annually by the U.S. Forest Service since 1977. Condition at end of fiscal year. Removal of snags from the river between its mouth and the Canadian border was accomplished as needed by contract under maintenance funds, from 1938 to 1964 when annual snag removal was initiated. Removal of snags and clearing of trees on shore as potential snags was 40-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 accomplished October 1967 through May 1968, June through October 1969, and August and September 1971. Memorandum of Understanding, providing for Forest Service personnel stationed in area to do clearing, signed August 1972. Operations were discontinued until 1977 when an environmental assessment of the work was completed. Snagging and clearing operations began again in 1977 and have continued since, maintaining the river fairly free of navigational hazards within the main channel. 14. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATIONAL PROJECTS See Table 40-C. 15. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION See Table 40-D. Beach Erosion Control 16. BEACH EROSION CONTROL UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Beach erosion control activities pursuant to Section 103, Public Law 874, 87th Congress (Preauthorization.) Fiscal year costs for preauthorization studies were $7,500 for Dillingham, Alaska, beach erosion. Flood Control Local Protection 17. TALKEETNA RIVER, ALASKA Location. At the town of Talkeetna near the confluence of the Talkeetna and Susitna Rivers, 80 miles north of Anchorage, Alaska. Previous project. Provided for stabilization of 1,500 feet of riverbank of the Talkeetna River with a brush and natural timber fascine for distance of 1,000 feet below the Alaska Railroad bridge as emergency bank protection for the town of Talkeetna. Construction began in March and was completed in May 1951 at a cost of $24,898 under authority of Section 14 of the Flood Control Act approved 24 July 1946. Existing project. Consists of riprapping 1,660 feet of the riverbank downstream from the railroad bridge to prevent further cutting of the east bank north of the town of Talkeetna, Alaska, and construction ofa 1,200-foot dike to divert river flow away from the riverbank. (See Table 40-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. The Matanuska-Susitna Borough provided without cost to the United States, all lands, easements, and rights-of-way necessary for the construction of the project; agreed to hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction work; agreed to maintain the works after completion in accordance with Federal regulations. Terminal facilities. There are no commercial facilities because Talkeetna River is not navigable to commercial vessels. Operations and results during fiscal year. Regular funds, new work: Project was started in June 1979 and completed in July 1980. Condition at end of fiscal year. Turnover date to the Borough was October 15, 1979. Project fiscally completed in FY 1981. 18. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspections were made of flood control works at Skagway River (Skagway), Klutina River (Copper Center), Gold Creek (Juneau), Lowell Creek, and Salmon River (Hyder). Minor repairs at each project were recommended to the responsible local authority. Total costs for the fiscal year: $18,314 19. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See Table 40-E. 20. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency flood control activities - repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation). Federal costs for the fiscal year were $75,147 for advance preparation and $1,940 for emergency operations. Reservoirs 21. CHENA RIVER LAKES, ALASKA Location. In the vicinity of Fairbanks, Alaska, and encompassing the Tanana River, Chena River, Little Chena River, and their tributaries. (See USGS map Fairbanks C1, Dl, D2, and Big Delta D6.) Existing project. Provides for a dam on the Chena River, 17 miles east of Fairbanks, a dam on the Little Chena River about 11 miles upstream from its confluence with the main Chena River, and a 22-mile levee system along the Tanana and Chena Rivers. Estimated Federal cost is $275,000,000 (full funding), and estimated non-Federal cost is $11,800,000. (See Table 40-B for authorizing legislation). Local cooperation. Local interests are required to hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction of the levees and drainage works; provide without cost to the United States, all lands, easements, and rights-of-ways necessary 40-6 ALASKA DISTRICT for the construction of the levee and interior drainage works; accomplish without cost to the United States, all necessary relocations of buildings, streets, and utilities as required for the levee project; maintain and operate the levee system and interior drainage works after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army. The North Star Borough formally signed this agreement on February 1, 1973. Operations and results during fiscal year. Regular funds, new work: Construction was completed on the fish ladder at Moose Creek Dam and some miscellaneous earthwork construction was also performed. A partial test filling of the reservoir took place in July 1981 which allowed for evaluation of the overall project. Condition at end of fiscal year. Moose Creek Dam and Floodway is operational and capable of controlling Chena River floods. Recreation facilities around borrow pit lake and river area are being designed and are scheduled for construction in FY 1982. Completion of levee was accomplished in FY 1981. Chena River monitoring program will determine the number and location of groins which will be constructed over a 10-year period. Interior drainage channel A scheduled for construction in FY 1982. Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 22. BRADLEY LAKE, ALASKA Location. At the head of Kachemak Bay near southwestern end of Kenai Peninsula, Alaska, about 100 air miles south of Anchorage and 25 miles northeast of Homer. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 8552.) Existing project. Provides for a main dam raising waters of Bradley Lake from an elevation of 1,090 feet to elevation 1,196 feet; a small dam to divert water from nearby drainage; an underground power tunnel, surge tank, and penstock to deliver water to a powerhouse located near tidewater, with an initial installed capacity of 70,000 kilowatts and transmission facilities to serve the Cook Inlet area. Latest cost estimate for new work (October 1981) is $217,000,000. (See Table 40-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. However, the local utility has indicated that it will construct the necessary transmission lines connecting a substation located approximately 17 miles from the project with the Homer and Kenai/Soldotna load centers. Operations and results during fiscal year. A reanalysis of the Bradley Lake hydropower project was completed by the Alaska District during 1978, while the Alaska Power Administration completed a marketability analysis during the same period. Based on additional data and analysis, the plan of development was revised such that the lake would be raised to 1,170 feet, the powerhouse would be underground, and the installed capacity would be increased to 118,000 kilowatts. Condition at the end of the fiscal year. Reappraisal of the project was undertaken because of rising costs of alternative fossil fuel-fired generation. The analysis showed the project offers net benefits and that Bradley Lake power is marketable. Advanced Engineering and Design studies have been initiated and are currently underway. 23. SNETTISHAM, ALASKA Location. At mouth of Speel River, between Crater Lake to the west and Long Lake to the north, 28 nautical miles southeast of Juneau, Alaska. (See Coast Geodetic Survey Chart 8227.) Existing project. Snettisham is a two-stage power project. The initial stage taps Long Lake and Crater Lake and constructs an underground powerhouse with three units and two transmission lines to Juneau, Alaska. The ultimate stage would provide a dam at the head of Long Lake to increase the energy capability of Long Lake. The Long Lake Dam is in a "Deferred" status. From Long Lake (elevation 815 feet), the water is transported through an approximately horizontal tunnel 8,400 feet long and a 1,400-foot penstock dropping at a 46 degree angle to the underground powerhouse at tidewater to drive two turbines with a generating capacity of 46,700 kilowatts. Power from two generators is supplied to Juneau by 138 kilovolt overhead transmission lines except for a submarine cable traversing Taku Inlet. Crater Lake phase of construction provides for tapping Crater Lake (elevation 1,022 feet) to drive a third turbine to be installed in the underground powerhouse to provide an additional generating capacity of 27,000 kilowatts. Estimated cost of initial stage construction is $153,000,000 (October 1981). The project was turned over to the Alaska Power Administration for operation and maintenance. (See Table 40-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Regular funds, new work: Minor deficiencies were corrected. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was initiated 11 July 1967. The Long Lake phase of the first stage of the project is complete. Permanent relocation of the Salisbury Ridge section of the line was completed in October 1976. General Investigations 24. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs of $1,445,020 for surveys include $259,684 for navigation studies, $1,103,336 for flood control studies, and $82,000 for coordination studies. 25. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Technical assistance, information, flood plain management guidance and other flood plain management services have been provided to military and nonmilitary Federal agencies, local communities, State agencies and others at a fiscal year cost of $220,000. Other activities included the completion of Type 15 Flood Insurance Studies for the communities of Delta Junction and the Matanuska-Susitna Borough. Total funds expended for the dam inspection program were $45,000, $5,000 for inventory and $40,000 for inspection. Fiscal year costs for Hydrologic Studies were $12,591. 26. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT No program in FY 1981. 40-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 40-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to In Text Project Funding FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 Sep. 30, 1981 1. Anchorage Harbor, Alaska 2. Bar Point Harbor, Alaska (Contrib. Funds) 3. Cordova Small Boat Harbor, Alaska (Contrib. Funds) 4. Craig Small Boat Harbor, Alaska 5. Dillingham Harbor, Alaska (Contrib. Funds) 6. Homer Harbor, Alaska 7. Hoonah Harbor, Alaska (Contrib. Funds) 8. Kake Harbor, Alaska 9. Metlakatla Harbor, Alaska New Work Approp. Cost Maint. 1 Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. 1 Approp. Cost Maint. 1 Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. 1 Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost - - - - 533,235 - - - - 533,235 703,558 1,713,550 1,196,700 1,935,000 9,406,925 738,923 1,516,681 1,387,648 1,923,216 9,387,949 48,000 1,511,556 343,792 - 2,000,000 34,933 1,058,225 806,461 2,871 1,999,142 - 1,318,421 - - 1,318,421 - 1,027,297 240,495 499 1,268,291 68,000 40,000 101,000 1,410,000 1,700,025 90,369 49,733 94,041 1,166,754 1,449,401 - - - 4,647,200 4,674,200 - - - 2,403,878 2,403,878 6,200 53,340 43,700 590,000 693,240 6,200 53,340 28,633 468,136 556,309 S- - - 548,790 S- - - 548,790 515,400 275,000 841,000 331,000 3,689,622 503,078 285,021 335,076 808,750 3,656,272 - - 1,700 - 1,700 - - 1,700 - 1,700 - - - - 1,512,349 2 S- - - 1,512,349 173,655 133,900 247,000 267,000 2,279,910 173,655 112,035 268,821 249,473 2,262,339 S- - - 67,974 S- - - 67,974 - 1,505,000 2,243,000 400,000 4,355,000 - 1,502,647 2,244,096 279,627 4,233,370 - 1,225,000 - - 1,225,000 - 1,011,479 113,525 38,190 1,163,194 - 151,000 255,000 80,000 640,700 - 150,516 253,210 79,588 638,014 25,000 575,000 3,160,000 860,000 5,101,470 25,007 573,807 3,116,770 184,628 4,381,675 40-8 ALASKA DISTRICT TABLE 40-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (continued) See Section Total Cost to In Text Project Funding FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 Sep. 30, 1981 (Contrib. Funds) 10. Ninilchik Harbor, Alaska 11. Nome Harbor, Alaska (Contrib. Funds) 12. Port Lions Small Boat Harbor, Alaska (Contrib. Funds) 13. Stikine River, Alaska 17. Talkeetna River, Alaska 21. Chena River Lakes, Alaska 22. Bradley Lake, Alaska 23. Snettisham, Alaska Maint. 1 Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. 1 Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. 1 Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. 1 Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. 1 Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. 1 Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 1,800 9,719 1,800 9,719 - 886,600 - 211,600 328,483 329,656 66,420 66,420 926,600 909,739 428,720 428,720 223,000 227,200 208,000 216,000 2,263,285 220,227 229,931 206,635 216,881 2,262,759 S- - - 1,348,240 S- - - 1,348,240 390,000 526,200 506,000 488,000 6,769,921 390,825 528,007 472,901 475,218 6,723,509 S- - - 125 S- - - 125 2,500 2,500 49,007 49,007 2,500 5,000 13,304 13,304 2,500 2,500 70,000 19,823 2,500 147,500 - 145,000 1,700,000 1,832,311 1,697,929 1,780,063 - 694,000 694,000 - 591,537 591,537 3,782 13,000 17,760 12,986 - 498,000 - 497,472 31,050,000 23,047,159 31,216,531 23,150,520 10,000 530,000 24,431 485,628 44,917 -22,159 509,074 9,979 14,000 8,249 25,000 16,722 8,770,000 8,752,012 2,765,000 2,719,207 -18,200 -19,239 5,000 146,168 7,451 142,832 -8,806 516,694 - 516,694 14,758,806 155,448,465 14,726,776 155,282,316 350,000 350,000 176,685 176,685 2,040,000 5,601,000 2,083,521 5,554,356 - 81,382,856 4,872 81,382,587 1. Includes applicable portion of Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys appropriations and costs. 2. Includes $2,672 of code 710 Rec. funds. 40-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 40-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents July 3, 1958 October 22, 1976 July 14, 1960 July 14, 1960 July 14, 1960 July 3, 1958 July 3, 1958 Aug. 19, 1964 ANCHORAGE HARBOR, ALASKA (See Section 1 of Text) Deep water harbor, adjacent to docks, dredge to 35 feet below mean lower low water, protected by two jetties.' Extension of project limits. BAR POINT HARBOR, ALASKA (See Section 2 of Text) Construct two breakwaters 963 feet, and 120 feet. CORDOVA SMALL BOAT HARBOR, ALASKA (See Section 3 of Text) Construction of 2,000-foot breakwater. CRAIG SMALL BOAT HARBOR, ALASKA (See Section 4 of Text) Construction of 2 short rubblemound breakwaters. DILLINGHAM HARBOR, ALASKA (See Section 5 of Text) Basin 230,000 square feet in area with depth of 2 feet above mean lower low water along Scandinavian Creek. with entrance channel 1,100 feet long and 40 feet wide. HOMER HARBOR, ALASKA (See Section 6 of Text) Basin 2.7 acres in area with depth of 12 feet below mean lower low water, and rock breakwater 1,260 feet long. Relocation and rehabilitation of project destroyed by March 27, 1964 earthquake, by construction of basin 10 acres in area with 12-foot depth over 2.75 acres and 15-foot depth over 7.25 acres protected by rock breakwaters, 1,018 feet and 238 feet long. H. Doc. 34, 85th Cong., 1st Sess. 2 P.L. 94-587 Section 107, P.L. 86-645 Approved June 29, 1978 Section 107, P.L. 86-645 Approved April 23, 1981 Section 107, P.L. 86-645 Approved Feb. 19, 1980 H. Doc. 390, 84th Cong., 2d Sess.2 H. Doc. 34, 85th Cong., 1st Sess.2 P.L. 88-451 HOONAH HARBOR, ALASKA (See Section 7 of Text) Oct. 27, 1965 (Sec. 201) Entrance channel, a rubblemound breakwater and diversion dike (Auth. Oct. 12, 1972) and two rubblemound breakwaters inclosing a 15.1 acre harbor area. Aug. 13, 1968 KAKE HARBOR, ALASKA (See Section 8 of Text) Basin 7-acre berthing area, 15 feet deep, inclosed by a 1,580-foot west rock breakwater and a 900-foot south rock breakwater. METLAKATLA HARBOR, ALASKA (See Section 9 of Text) Mar. 2, 1945 Dredging small boat basin 2.18 acres in extent to a depth of 10 feet below plane of mean lower low water; construction of rubble-mound breakwater 900 feet long. Oct. 27, 1965 (Sec. 201) Improvement consists of entrance channel and two rubblemound (Auth. Oct. 12, 1972) breakwaters inclosing a 7.0 acre basin. July 3, 1958 NINILCHIK HARBOR, ALASKA (See Section 10 of Text) Basin 320 feet long by 150 feet wide with depth of 2 feet above mean lower low water, approach channel 400 feet long and 50 feet wide with depth of 9 feet above mean lower low water, protected by 410-foot jetty. H. Doc. 92-200, 92nd Cong., 2nd Sess.2 S. Doec. 70, 90th Cong., 2nd Sess. 2 H. Doc. 138, 76th Cong., 91st Sess. S. Doc. 92-64, 92d Cong., 2d Sess.2 H. Doc. 34, 85th Cong., 1st Sess.2 40-10 ALASKA DISTRICT TABLE 40-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (continued) Acts Work Authorized Documents NOME HARBOR, ALASKA (See Section 11 of Text) Aug. 8, 1917 Two jetties, easterly 335 feet and westerly 460 feet long; H. Doc. 1932, 64th Cong., revetment, channel and basin 200 feet wide and 250 feet long. 2d Sess. 2 Aug. 30, 1935 Extension of the jetties and enlarging basin to 250 feet wide H. Doc. 404, 71st Cong., and 600 feet long.3 2d Sess., and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 38, 73d Cong., 2d Sess. 2 June 16, 1948 Sea wall. Report of Chief of Engineers dated March 8, 1948. PORT LIONS SMALL BOAT HARBOR, ALASKA (See Section 12 of Text) July 14, 1960 Construction of a 600-foot breakwater and a 170-foot stub Section 107, P.L. 86-645 breakwater inclosing a 12-acre harbor Approved April 9, 1979 STIKINE RIVER, ALASKA (See Section 13 of Text) Aug. 30, 1935 Snagging from mouth to Canadian border. H. Doc. 210. 72nd Cong., 1st Sess.2 TALKEETNA RIVER, ALASKA (See Section 17 of Text) July 3, 1958 1200-foot dike, 1,660 feet of bank revetment. H. Doc. 34. 85th Cong., 1st. Sess.2 CHENA RIVER LAKES, ALASKA (See Section 21 of Text) Aug. 13, 1968 Dam and reservoir on the main Chena River, a dam and deten- S. Doc. 89. 90th Cong., tion reservoir on the Little Chena River, and a levee along the 2d Sess.2 north side of the Tanana River. BRADLEY LAKE, ALASKA (See Section 22 of Text) Oct. 23, 1962 Multi-purpose dam, with powerhouse and transmission facilities. H. Doc. 455, 87th Cong., 2d Sess.2 SNETTISHAM, ALASKA (See Section 23 of Text) Oct. 23, 1962 Multi-purpose dam, with powerhouse and transmission facilities. H. Doc. 40, 87th Cong., 1st Sess. 2 1. Purchase of dredge and deepwater jetties deauthorized 6 November 1977 under 2. Contains latest published map. Section 12. Public Law 93-251. 3. Extension of jetties classified "inactive". 40-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 40-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Section 11 of Text) For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1981 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance 1 Apoon Mouth of Yukon River, Alaska 2 3 Cook Inlet Shoals, Alaska 2 Cordova Harbor, Alaska 2 Craig Harbor, Alaska 2 Douglas Harbor, Alaska 2 Dry Pass, Alaska 2 Egegik River, Alaska 2 Elfin Cove, Alaska 2 Gastineau Channel, Alaska 2 Haines Harbor, Alaska 2 Humboldt Harbor, Alaska2 Iliuliuk Harbor, Alaska 2 Juneau Harbor, Alaska 2 Ketchikan Harbor, Alaska 2 6 King Cove Harbor, Alaska 2 Kodiak Harbor, Alaska 2 Myers Chuck Harbor, Alaska Naknek River, Alaska2 Neva and Olga Straits, Alaska 2 Old Harbor, Kodiak Island, Alaska 2 8 Pelican Harbor, Alaska 2 Petersburg Harbor, Alaska 2 Port Alexander, Alaska 2 9 Rocky Pass, Alaska 2 Seldovia Harbor, Alaska 2 Sergius Whitestone, Alaska 2 Seward Harbor, Alaska2 Sitka Harbor, Alaska2 Skagway Harbor, Alaska 2 St. Michael Canal, Alaska 2 3 Valdez Harbor, Alaska 2 Wrangell Harbor, Alaska 2 Wrangell Narrows, Alaska 2 1920 1977 1978 1974 1963 1960 1972 1959 1964 1977 1977 1941 1974 1979 1974 1973 1970 1961 1960 1972 1964 1972 1949 1960 1974 1973 1973 1973 1972 1916 1968 1969 1979 1. Includes applicable portion of reconnaissance and condition survey costs. 2. Complete. 3. Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st Sess. 4. In addition $925,500 of State funds. 5. In addition $857,000 of State funds. 6. West breakwater deauthorized under Sec. 12, PL 93-251, 2 November 1979. 7. Includes $594,163 for rehabilitation. $ 128,896 1,220,000 843,534 377,260 282,019 943,351 4,441 154,191 789,461 1,000,0004 3,679,6835 66,037 1,381,150 1,602,417 2,264,948 1,891,2127 9,700 20,789 155,009 370,415 369,683 252,932 17,000 337,668 1,051,88310 1,798,010 712,36911 12 1,611,009 133,180 377,062 649,74013 14 537,020 3,562,343 $ 4,581 5,000 752,132 128,063 97,272 104,515 24,470 37,044 209,167 51,542 40,672 15,868 472,438 506,031 36,367 122,968 20,057 6,906 173,021 55,601 150,578 14,143 92,262 98,124 23,690 323,803 81,550 127,267 1,360 308,410 226,492 911,524 8. Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Sec. 107). 9. Inner channel deauthorized under Sec. 12, PL 93-251, 6 November 1977. 10. Includes $400,000 for rehabilitation. 11. Includes $90,026 for rehabilitation. 12. Includes $2,528 Code 710, Recreation Facilities at Completed projects. 13. Includes $73,000 for rehabilitation. 14. Includes $2,713 Code 710, Recreation Facilities at Completed projects. 40-12 ALASKA DISTRICT TABLE 40-D NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation Activities Pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (Preauthorization) (See Section 15 of Text) Study Identification Fiscal Year Costs Bethel Harbor, Alaska Dillingham Small Boat Harbor, Alaska Homer Harbor, Alaska Juneau Harbor, Alaska Kenai, Alaska Kotzebue, Alaska Mekoryuk, Alaska Ninilchik Harbor, Alaska Saxman, Alaska Seward Harbor, Alaska Whittier, Alaska Total $ 25,855 40,972 70,579 33,030 5,000 7,500 121,049 203,131 46,166 72,473 6,325 $632,080 TABLE 40-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 19 of Text) For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1981 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Fairbanks, Alaska' 1964 310,000 1,624 Fairbanks, Tanana River & Chena Slough, Alaska2 1943 557,000 2,657 Gold Creek, Alaska2 1975 876,006 4,301 Klutina River, Copper Center, Alaska2 9 1973 260,681 - Lowell Creek, Alaska2 1945 416,3823 30,771' Salmon River, Alaska2 1963 37,7705 7 s Skagway River, Alaska2 1966 26,385 - 1. Reauthorized, see Section 18, Chena River Lakes. 2. Completed and transferred to local interests for maintenance. 6. Includes $34,197 of PWA funds. 3. In addition, $25,000 expended from contributed funds. 7. In addition, $138,957 expended for emergency flood activities (1963). 4. In addition, $12,000 expended from contributed funds. 8. In addition, $27,400 expended from contributed funds. 5. In addition, $7,000 expended from contributed funds. 9. Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Sec. 205). 40-13 BOARD OF ENGINEERS FOR RIVERS AND HARBORS The Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors is a continuing body created by Section 3 of the 1902 River and Harbor Act. The Board is selected by the Chief of Engineers and is comprised of seven senior engineer officers. The Deputy Chief of Engineers normally serves as Chairman. Five members are Division Engineers rotated from within continental U.S. Army Engineer Divisions. The seventh member, assigned full time to the Board as Resident Member, also directs the staff in carrying out the responsibilities of the Board. The Board meets on call of the Chairman. The Board has several statutory duties. It conducts independent reviews of Corps survey reports covering water resources projects and reports its conclusions and recommendations to the Chief of Engineers. The Chief of Engineers then forwards the reports with his conclusions and recommendations to the Secretary of the Army for transmission to the Congress. The Board conducts independent reviews of special reports ordered by the Congress. It also considers and approves general plans for major modification and reconstruction of any lock, canal, canalized river or other work for the use or benefit of navigation. In addition to its statutory duties, the Chief of Engineers has assigned further duties to the Board. As directed, it reviews Corps policies and procedures, additional special reports for the Secretary of the Army and the Chief of Engineers, and reports of other Federal agencies pertaining to water resource development, and conducts a ten-month program of in-service training for approximately fifteen Corps planners annually-generally at GS-12 and 13 levels-in all aspects of Federal water resources development. The training program helps meet Corps needs for increased numbers of qualified people in the planning field. The Board also has administrative responsibility for processing proposed reports of the Chief of Engineers, along with Final Environmental Impact Statements, to states and Federal agencies for their 90-day review. In addition to other duties, the Resident Member of the Board is second alternate for the Secretary of the Army on the Foreign-Trade Zones Board, and is ex-officio secretary of the American Section, Permanent International Association of Navigation Congresses (PIANC), a quasi-official organization. The membership of the Board on September 30, 1981 was: MG William R. Wray, Chairman, Deputy Chief of Engineers, Pulaski Building, Washington, D.C. MG William E. Read, Division Engineer, U. S. Army Engineer Division, Lower Mississippi Valley, Vicksburg, MS MG Hugh G. Robinson, Division Engineer, U.S. Army Engineer Division, Southwestern, Dallas, TX MG James N. Ellis, Division Engineer, U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic, Atlanta, GA BG Scott B. Smith, Division Engineer, U.S. Army Engineer Division, North Central, Chicago, IL BG Homer Johnstone, Jr., Division Engineer, U. S. Army Engineer Division, South Pacific, San Francisco, CA COL Frederick W. Mueller, Jr., Resident Member, Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors, Ft. Belvoir, VA Official Board Actions. In compliance with resolutions of the Congress and instructions from the Chief of Engineers, the Board completed 53 official report reviews during Fiscal Year 1981. The favorable reports category includes favorably recommended projects for Federal construction as well as projects for solving water resources problems for major metropolitan areas, even though they may not include recommendations for construction by any agency of the Federal Government. The urban studies listed below fall under this latter category. Reports Recommending Favorably for Federal Construction: The Board recommended 27 projects estimated to cost a total of $2,162,810,000 of which $1,785,879,000 is the first cost to the United States and $376,931,000 the first cost to non-Federal interests for work and cash contributions. Fourche Bayou Basin in the Vicinity of Little Rock, AR Lava Flow Control, Island of Hawaii, HI Norfolk Harbor and Channels, VA Puerco River and Tributaries, Gallup, NM Monroe Harbor, MI Redwood River at Marshall, MN Mobile Harbor, AL Quincy Coastal Streams, MA (Town Brook Interim) Atlantic Coast of Maryland and Assateague Island, VA Green Brook Sub-basin, Raritan River Basin, NJ Central Ohio Survey, Scioto River at North Chillicothe, OH Navigation Season Extension for Great Lakes and St. Lawrence Seaway Indian River County, FL Sacramento River Deep Water Ship Channel, CA Harry S. Truman Dam and Reservoir, MO Sacramento River Bank Protection, CA, First Phase, Fish and Wildlife Program Mingo Cree, Tulsa, OK Miami River, Little Miami River, Interim Report 2, West Carrollton, Holes Creek, OH Kill Van Kull and Newark Bay Channels, NY and NJ W.D. Mayo Lock and Dam 14, OK Murray Lock and Dam, AR Little Colorado River at Holbrook, AZ Perry Creek, IA (Interim Report) Charlotte County, FL Mill Cove, Jacksonville, FL Crown Bay Channel, St. Thomas, VI Oates Creek, Richmond County, GA One favorable report was recalled by reporting officers without Board action: Ogdensburg Harbor, NY. Reports Recommending Unfavorably for Federal Construction: During Fiscal Year 1981, the Board concurred in the unfavorable recommendations of the reporting officers for Federal construction on 10 projects: Saranac River, Morrisonville, NY Brunswick Harbor, GA (Phase I GDM) Ventura County, CA St. Francis River Navigation, AR Little Girls Point, MI Mississippi River Year-Round Navigation Study Milton Dam, Mahoning County, OH Lockwoods Folly and Shallotte River Inlets, NC Rahway River Basin, NJ Schuylkill River Review Study, PA General Design Memoranda: The Board reviewed and 41-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS U.S. ARMY 1981 submitted favorable recommendations on eight General Design Memoranda during the reporting period: Charleston Harbor, SC Presque Isle Peninsula, Erie, PA Lock Haven, PA Fountain Creek, Pueblo, CO Tittabawassee River at Midland, MI James River Basin, VA Santa Ana River Main Stem, Including Santiago Creek, CA Cape May Inlet to Lower Township, NJ Urban Studies: In response to Congressional resolutions, the Board submitted favorable findings on eight urban studies: Pensacola-Tallahassee Metro and Other Urban Areas, FL Four River Basins, FL Jacksonville Metro Area, FL Island-Wide Water Supply Study, PR Metro Wheeling Urban Study, WVA and OH Metro Denver and South Platte River and Tributaries, CO, WY, NE Quad Cities, IL and IA Portland-Vancouver Metro Area Water Resources Study, OR and WA During Fiscal Year 1981, the Board held four meetings: November 19-20,1980; February 18-19, 1981; May 13,1981; and September 9, 1981. Since 1902, the Board has acted on 8,542 survey reports, recommending favorably on 3,797 and unfavorably on 4,743. 41-2 1981 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION* The Mississippi River Commission (MRC) was created by an act of Congress on Jun. 28, 1879. The Flood Control Act of May 15, 1928, authorized the Flood Control, Mississippi River and Tributaries (MR&T) Project. The Commission consists of three officers of the Corps of Engineers, one from the former Coast and Geodetic Survey (presently the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration), and three civilians, two of whom must be civil engineers. All members are appointed by the President with the advice and consent of the Senate. During the fiscal year the Commissioners were: Mr. Roy T. Sessums, civil engineer; MG Louis W. Prentiss, Jr., U.S. Army, until his retirement Sep. 30, 1981; MG Richard L. Harris, U.S. Army, until his retirement Nov. 30, 1980; and Mr. Sam E. Angel. COL John L. Cannon, U.S. Army, served as Secretary of the Commission in the office of its President, Mississippi River Commission Building, Vicksburg, Miss. until his retirement Jun. 30, 1981; COL Joseph Yore, U.S. Army was appointed Secretary Jul. 13, 1981. The MRC is charged, under direction of the Secretary of the Army and supervision of the Chief of Engineers, with prosecution of improvements for flood control of the Mississippi River and of its tributaries and outlets in its alluvial valley, so far as they are affected by Mississippi River backwater, between Head of Passes, La. (mile 0), and Cape Girardeau, Mo. (1,006 miles AHP-Lower Mississippi mileage terminates at mile 954 AHP), and with prosecution of improvements in the interest of navigation between Cairo, Ill. (954 miles AHP), and Baton Rouge, La. (234 miles AHP); and for stabilization of the lower 7 miles of the right bank of the Ohio River, to former mouth of Cache River. It also is charged with prosecution of certain flood control works on the Mississippi River and tributaries, as far as they are affected by backwater, between Cape Girardeau, Mo., and Rock Island, Ill. (1,437 miles AHP), and with prosecution of improvements on designated tributaries and outlets below Cape Girardeau for flood control, navigation, major drainage, and related water uses. Authorized operations of the Commission below Cape Girardeau are conducted by District Engineers of New Orleans, Vicksburg, and Memphis Districts within the areas described below, in accordance with approved directives and programs and congressional appropriations therefor. New Orleans District: Mississippi River project levees and river channel stabilization as required from Head of Passes, mile Oto 320 AHP, including south bank levee of Red River to Hotwells, La.; construction of four salinity-control structures for fish and wildlife enhancement in lower Mississippi River Delta region; Bonnet Carre' and Morganza Floodways; maintenance and improvements of Mississippi River navigation channel from Baton Rouge, La. (mile 234 AHP), to mile 320; Baton Rouge Harbor (Devils Swamp); navigation improvement of Atchafalaya and Old Rivers from Mississippi River to Morgan City; control of Old and Atchafalaya Basin Floodways; flood control and drainage improvements in Bayou Cocodrie and tributaries, in Bayou des Glaises, and in Upper Pointe Coupee Loop area; flood protection in eastern Rapides and south-central Avoyelles Parishes, La.; and freshwater distribution from Atchafalaya River to Teche- Vermilion Basins. Vicksburg District: Mississippi River project levees and river channel stabilization as required from upper limits of New Orleans District (mile 320 AHP) in vicinity of Black Hawk, La., to Coahoma-Bolivar County line, Miss. (mile 620 AHP) on left bank, and to vicinity of mouth of White River, Ark. (mile 599 AHP), on right bank including south bank Arkansas River levee to vicinity of Pine Bluff, Ark., and north bank levee to vicinity of Tucker on left bank of Plum Bayou, Ark.; bank stabilization in lower 36.1 miles of Arkansas River; maintenance and improvement of Mississippi River navigation channel between miles 320 and 599 AHP; Vicksburg and Greenville Harbors; specific fish and wildlife facilities in Tensas, Yazoo, and Big Sunflower Basins; a streambank erosion control project in the Yazoo Basin; flood control and drainage improvements in Red River backwater area including leveed portion east and west of Black River and south of Red River; Jonesville, La., Boeuf and Tensas Rivers and Bayou Macon Basins and tributaries, Ark. and La., and Bayou Lafourche, La.; Yazoo River Basin, Miss., including backwater area; Big and Little Sunflower Rivers, Deer Creek, and Steele Bayou, Miss.; and Grand Prairie Region and Bayou Meto Basin, Ark., including provision for agricultural water supply. Memphis District: Mississippi River project levees and river channel stabilization as required, from upper limits of Vicksburg District to north bank of Little River diversion channel, Mo. (1,003 miles AHP), a few miles below Cape Girardeau, Mo., on right bank, and to Cache River diversion channel (967 miles AHP) above Cairo, Ill., on left bank, including levees and revetment on right bank of Ohio River, in Mounds-Mound City area, Ill.; except operations above Cairo, Ill., do not include channel stabilization on the Mississippi River. Maintenance and improvement of Mississippi River navigation channel between mile 599 and 954 AHP and of Memphis Harbor, Tenn.; specific fish and wildlife facilities in St. Francis Basin; levees in White River backwater area up to vicinity of Augusta, Ark., and a pumping plant near mouth of White River; levees and pumping plants at De Valls Bluff and Des Arc, Ark.; channel improvements in Cache River Basin, Ark.; channel improvements in Big Creek and tributaries, Ark.; improvement works in St. Francis River Basin, Mo. and Ark., including backwater area improvements in Belle Fountain Ditch and Drainage District No. 17, Ark.; Little River diversion channel, Mo., and L'Anguille River, Ark.; Wolf River Basin, Tenn.; Obion and Forked Deer River Basins, Tenn.; Reelfoot Lake area, including channel improvement for Bayou du Chien and Lake No. 9, Tenn. and Ky.; West Kentucky tributaries, Ky.; Mud Lake pumping station, Tenn.; and pumping plants and outlet structures in the Cairo-Mounds-Mounds City area, Ill. * Authorizing legislation (Tables 42-D and 42-E) and cost a id financial statement (Table 42-U) are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of his chapter. 42-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 Field operations of the Commission restricted to levee construction under Sec. 6, 1928 Flood Control Act (local interests contributing one-third of costs and furnishing rights-of-way) are conducted within the following limits by two districts reporting directly to the Commission on matters within their jurisdiction-St. Louis District: Mississippi River (Sec. 6) levees from upper limits of Memphis District to Clemens Station, Mo. (1,254 miles AHP), on right bank, and Hamburg Bay, Ill. (1,215 miles AHP), on left bank, and Illinois River from its mouth to mile 120 at Havana, Ill. Rock Island District: Mississippi River (Sec. 6) levees from upper limits of St. Louis District to Rock Island, Ill. (1,437 miles AHP). For work accomplished see Table 42-N, page 42-50, Annual Report for 1975. MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND ALLUVIAL VALLEY BELOW CAPE GIRARDEAU, MO. Location and description. The Mississippi River rises in Lake Itasca, Minn., and flows generally southerly for 2,340 miles through the central portion of United States to empty into the Gulf of Mexico 115 miles below New Orleans. It is improved for barge navigation for 1,832 miles to Minneapolis, Minn. The Mississippi River and its major tributaries, the Missouri, Ohio, St. Francis, White, Arkansas, Yazoo, and Red- Old Rivers, drain 1,245,000 square miles in all or part of 31 states between the Rocky and Appalachian Mountains and part of two Canadian provinces. Below Cape Girardeau, Mo., 53 miles above Ohio River, river bottomlands widen abruptly into an alluvial valley of 35,460 square miles which was originally subjected to flood overflow. A major part of the alluvial valley has been protected from floods by levees which confine floodflows within a floodplain having an average width of 5 miles. (See map of alluvial valley of Mississippi River, scale 1:500,000.) Observations made by Mississippi River Commission to Sep. 30, 1981, show approximate all-time maximum and minimum discharges between levees as follows: Cairo to White River, 2,000,000 and 70,000 cubic feet per second; thence to Red River, 2,150,000 and 90,000 cubic feet per second; thence to the Gulf of Mexico, 1,500,000 and 50,000 cubic feet per second in Mississippi River and 660,000 and 11,000 cubic feet per second in Atchafalaya River. As the 1927 floodflow was not confined between levees, maximum discharges recorded do not include entire flow of the 1927 flood, maximum of record below White River. High water and flood stages usually occur in late winter or early spring, but great floods such as that of 1937 cccurred as early as January. Low water stages generally prevail from August to December. Extreme all-time ranges in stages recorded at representative gages (rounded to nearest foot) are 60 feet at Cairo, 49 feet at Memphis, 57 feet at Red River Landing, and 21 feet at New Orleans (Carrollton). The river is nontidal above Red River Landing where tidal amplitude rarely exceeds 0.1 foot during extreme low water. Previous projects. For details see page 1944, Annual Report for 1932. Existing project. The Mississippi River and Tributaries Project in the alluvial valley between Head f Passes, La., and Cape Girardeau, Mo., provides protection from floods by means of levees, floodwalls, floodways, reservoirs (in Yazoo and St. Francis Basins), bank stabilization, and channel improvements in and along the river and its tributaries and outlets insofar as affected by backwater of Mississippi River, including levee work on the main stem between Cape Girardeau and Rock Island. When completed, 23,621 square miles will be protected from the Mississippi River project flood. The project also provides for a 12- by 300-foot navigation channel between Baton Rouge, La., and Cairo, Ill.; for salinitycontrol structures; and for channel realinement and improvement including bank stabilization and dikes to reduce flood heights, control natural tendency of river to lengthen by meandering, and protect levees from being destroyed by caving banks. Locations of major main stem Mississippi River improvements are shown in Table 42-A and those for off-main stem tributaries are shown in Table 42-B. Pertinent data on dams and lakes are shown in Table 42-C. Authorizing and incorporating legislation are shown in Tables 42-D and 42-E. Summary of presently estimated Federal cost of authorized improvements is shown in Table 42-F. Construction of the existing project began in 1928 and has continued throughout ensuing years. Based on the estimated cost of $12,509,632,000 (Cost projected through the construction period), and actual expenditures through Sep. 30, 1981, of $3,076,674,570, the entire project is about 25 percent complete. Recommended modifications. None. Local cooperation. The Flood Control Act of 1928, as amended, applies. Such requirements have, in general, been complied with by local interests. Terminal facilities. See volume 1 of two-volume Port Series No. 21, 1969, "Ports on the Gulf Coast of the United States," for Baton Rouge and Lake Charles, La.; Port Series No. 20, 1977, for New Orleans, La.; also folio of Flood Control and Navigation Maps of Mississippi River, Cairo, Ill., to the Gulf of Mexico (48th edition), 1980. Project cost. Total allotted for flood control, including maintenance charges through Aug. 18, 1941, chargeable under authorizations to Sep. 30, 1981, was $3,086,516,837. (See Table 42-S.) (See also Tables 42-R, 42-T, and 42-U for additional financial statements.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Commission activities: The 312th session was held Oct.20-24, 1980, on board the U.S. MV Mississippi en route on the Mississippi River from Cape Girardeau, Mo., to Morgan City, La. Bank protection works, levees, and channel conditions were observed en route, as well as a drive-through inspection of the St. Johns-New Madrid Floodway project. The Commission also participated in the dedication of the Cairo, Ill., pumping plant. Approximately 170 persons attended public meetings held at Cape Girardeau, Mo.; Memphis, Tenn.; Greenville, Miss.; and Morgan City, La. About 25 of the representatives presented various problems pertaining to flood control and navigation. This session adjourned at Morgan City, La., at 3:50 p.m., Oct. 24, 1980. The 313th session was held May 18-22, 1981, on board the U.S. MV Mississippi en route on the Mississippi River from Cairo, Iil., to New Orleans, La. Major features of the project were insp cted, including bank protection works, contraction works, ]vees, and general channel conditions. Public meetings held at Cairo, Ill., Memphis, Tenn., Vicksburg, Miss., Pan New Orleans, La., were attended by about 140 representatives of loal go vernmental, navigation, levee, commercial, and odner inter:sts. About 27 of those in attendance addressed the Commission and presented problems pertaining to flood control and navigation. This session was adjourned at New Orleans at 10:50 a.m., May 22, 1981. 42-2 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION Records of Proceedings of all sessions of the Mississippi River Commission are on file in the office of the President. Alluvial Valley Mapping General. Contoured quadrangles and general maps of the alluvial valley are available for departmental use and public distribution under prescribed regulations. Preparation, revision, and publication of quadrangle maps (scale 1:62,500) continued. Road-map-type information brochures of principal portions of the overall project were published along with pamphlets on the subject of flood control and navigation. Maps and supplemental data sheets for active works were updated and published as required. The 1980 (48th) edition of the folio of flood control and navigation maps (scale 1:62,500) covering the Mississippi River from Cairo, Ill., to the Gulf of Mexico was revised and printed. Approximately 723 flight-line miles of infra-red color; 10,185 flight-line miles of black-and-white aerial photography (various scales); and about 211.8 hours of oblique photography were flown along the Mississippi River and tributaries in the New Orleans, Vicksburg, and Memphis Districts. Work accomplished in the Districts: New Orleans District- Series conversion of the East Delta, West Delta, Breton Island, Venice, Southwest Pass, Barataria, Black Bay, Empire, Fort Livingston, and Pointe a la Hache, La. quadrangles were completed and printed. Slidell, La., was completed and scheduled for printing. Memphis District-Series conversion of U. S. Geological Survey 1:24,000-scale to 1:62,500-scale quadrangles of Hayti, Mo.-Ark.; Malden, Mo., and Pascola, Mo., are ready for printing and Sedgwick, Weiner, and Tilton, Ark., are in progress. Revision of Rolla, Paducah, Poplar Bluff, Dyersburg, Memphis, and Blytheville, scale 1:250,000, is in progress. Vicksburg District-Series conversion of U.S. Geological Survey 1:24,000-scale to 1:62,500-scale quadrangle with addition of flood damage prevention features of Malvern, Moro Bay, El Dorado, Strong, Felsenthal, Ark. and Oxford, Miss. are in progress. Floods Streamflow observations during the fiscal year follow: Memphis District-Mississippi River crest stage of 42.0 feet at Cairo gage on May 23, 1981, and maximum discharge of 907,000 cubic feet per second, occurred on May 23, 1981, at Hickman, Ky., and crest stage of 25.0 feet at Memphis on May 26, 1981, with maximum discharge of 957,000 cubic feet per second on May 26, 1981. Vicksburg District-Flooding was non-existent in Vicksburg District during FY 81. There were no bankfull stages reached on the Mississippi River. Vicksburg District's reach with maximum stages and discharges as follows: Arkansas City, crest stage of 28.0 feet on June 13, with a peak discharge of 945,000 cubic feet per second on May 31; Vicksburg, crest stage of 32.5 feet on June 13, with a peak discharge of 956,000 cubic feet per second on June 2; and Natchez, crest stage of 40.0 feet on June 14, with a peak discharge of 968,000 cubic feet per second on June 3. No significant long duration flooding occurred on the Ouachita, Yazoo, Black, and Big Black Rivers in the Vicksburg District during FY 81. New Orleans District--On the Mississippi River, the Red River Landing gage recorded a maximum stage of 44.18 feet NGVD on Jun. 18, 1981, and the New Orleans gage recorded a maximum stage of 11.66 feet NGVD on Jun. 18, 1981. On the Atchafalaya River, the Simmesport gage recorded a maximum of 27.04 feet NGVD on Jun. 15, 1981. On the Red River the Alexandria gage recorded 70.35 feet NGVD on Jun. 12, 1981. Studies and Investigations General investigations. Surveys and reports, authorized by laws and by Senate and House Public Works Committee resolutions, were made as required. Collection and study of basic data continued. Studies continued on various requests for modifications of the existing project, Mississippi River and Tributaries, authorized by the Flood Control Act of May 15, 1928, as amended (see Table 42-D). Engineering studies. A research program was continued for development of materials and more effective and economical design of regulation features for placing and stabilizing the Mississippi River in a suitable alinement. Potomology investigations of river behavior continue to be made. Investigations into the major cause-and-effect relationships attributable to major changes in stage-discharge relationships on the Mississippi River as a result of both natural and man-made modifications are continuing. Individual studies in hydrology, channel geometry, sedimentation, and hydraulic characteristics are complete and an interim report on results of the studies will be completed in the first quarter of Fiscal Year 1982. Mississippi River and Tributaries--Levees Operations and results during fiscal year. This feature consists of construction of new, and enlargement of existing, levees to approved grade and section; construction and restoration of levee berms; and construction, repair, and maintenance of roads on levees. Work accomplished is summarized in Table 42-N and further broken down as follows: New Orleans District-Enlarged 32.3 miles of levees and built 1.0 mile of berms in the Main Stem System and surfaced 6.6 miles of roads on Atchafalaya River levees and built 8.8 miles on the South bank-Lower Red River. See Table 42-K. Vicksburg District-Constructed 10.1 miles of berms, and 6.7 miles of levees, in the Main Stem System. See Table 42-L. Memphis District-No construction this fiscal year. See Table 42-M. Condition as of Sep. 30. (See Tables 42-K, 42-L, 42-M, and 42-N.) There are 1,608.3 miles of levees authorized for the Mississippi River below Cape Girardeau, of which 1,601.5 are in place with 1,166.2 built to approved grade and section. The Main Stem Levee System consists of 2,202.1 miles, of which 2,195.3 are in place with 1,536.9 miles completed to approved grade and section. Included in this system are additional levees and structures along the south bank of Arkansas River (85.4 miles); along the south bank of Red River (59.2 miles, with 59.2 completed); and 449.2 miles in the Atchafalaya River Basin, with 449.2 complete. Of the authorized 703.4 miles of berms, 469.0 are complete. Graveled or hard-surfaced roads have been constructed on 1,717.6 miles of these levees. There are an additional 1,614.6 miles of authorized levees 42-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 off the main stem, of which 1,109.2 are in place with 812.6 to approved grade and section. Berms have been completed on 9.8 miles and 805.7 miles of graveled or hard-surfaced roads have been constructed on the levees. For last summary of levee work accomplished under Sec. 6, 1928 Flood Control Act, see Table 42-N, pages 42-50, Annual Report for 1975. Mississippi River and Tributaries- Channel Improvements Operations and results during fiscal year. Dredging: Mississippi River Main Stem-(See Table 42-G). Work included dredging 35,881,000 cubic yards for maintenance of channel and harbor improvements. Minimum channel depth of 9 feet was maintained. Dredging was done with the following plant: New Orleans District, channel maintenance dredging was performed by the dredge Jadwin. Vicksburg District, two Government-owned dustpan dredges and one leased cutterhead dredge. The Vicksburg District channel maintenance dredging was performed by the dredges Jadwin and Burgess. The harbors were maintained with the leased contract cutterhead dredge Lewis James, Memphis District, two Government-owned dustpan dredges, one leased cutterhead dredge, and one contract dustpan (ICP). The Memphis District channel maintenance dredging, mile 599 to 800, was advertised under the Industry Capability Program in February 1981. Bids were opened in March 1981. One bid was received from the dredging industry with Bean Corporation filing a protest. The harbors were maintained with the leased contract cutterhead dredge Natchez. A maintenance dredging contract was awarded to Bean Corp. March 1981 under ICP on LMR Miles 599 to 800. Bank revetment and dikes: (See Table 42-H, 42-I, and 42-J.) Construction of 12.13 miles of new bank revetment and 111,103 squares of concrete mattress, for maintenance, along the Mississippi River was completed by Government plant and hired labor. Also, 2.15 miles of new dikes were constructed and 10,135 squares were placed for maintenance. In addition, work on tributaries consisted of placement of 1.30 miles of new dikes and 8,938 squares for maintenance. Other work performed in the interest of navigation, supplementing maintenance dredging on Mississippi River between Cairo, Ill., and Baton Rouge, La., included removal of snags, wrecks, and obstructions; issuance of bulletins by the Vicksburg District providing information on available highwater velocities at selected locations; maintaining bulletin boards showing daily gage readings at regular MRC gages; and contract pilot service furnishing navigation interests with latest information and advice on channel conditions and obtaining their views as to needs of navigation interests. Cost of this work is given in Table 42-R. Condition as of Sep. 30. In carrying out authorized channel improvement program between Baton Rouge and Cairo, 16 cutoffs were developed between 1933 and 1942. These, combined with chute channel development and alinement improvements, decreased channel length between these cities by about 170 miles. However, current velocities increased the attack on the banks and the river began to regain its length. As a result, the net shortening between 1933 and 1962 was 114 miles of the theoretical 170-mile cutoff. There are now in place 789.90 miles of operative bank revetment and 186.04 miles of dikes on the lower Mississippi River. This amount of channel stabilization should prevent the river from regaining much more of its length due to meandering. A navigation channel 9- by 300-feet is being accomplished by revetment and dikes and maintained by dredging as required during the low-water season. Due to growing effectiveness of channel improvement program, average maintenance dredging requirements are steadily being reduced, and an increase in navigable depth is being obtained. Approximately 99.8 miles of foreshore protection have been constructed along the lower Mississippi River. There are 62.72 miles of revetment and 5.20 miles of dikes on tributary channels as listed in Tables 42-H, 42-I, and 42-J. New Orleans District ATCHAFALAYA BASIN, LA. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work by hired labor: Real estate activities and planning for construction were continued. New work by contract: Construction of floodside and landside berms and levee enlargement continued intermittently on the east and west protection levees, although there was considerable delay during the year due to exceptionally high water flooding the borrow pits. One contract on the west protection levee, initiated Mar. 18, 1976, was completed over a distance of 4.9 miles with placement of 52,909 cubic yards. One contract on the east protection levee, initiated Mar. 25, 1980, was completed over a distance of 3.2 miles with placement of 130,419 cubic yards and one contract, initiated Sep. 10, 1980, was completed over a distance of 3.2 miles with placement of 296,383 cubic yards. An additional 12.4 miles of levee enlargement and floodside and landside berms are under construction on the west protection levee involving placement of 2,022,350 cubic yards during this period and 5.8 miles of levee enlargement and floodwall on the east protection levee with placement of 259,149 cubic yards. A contract for Pointe Coupee pumping station, Upper Pointe Coupee Loop area, was awarded Feb. 20, 1981, initiated Mar. 23, 1981, and is 14 percent complete. Maintenance by hired labor: Bayou Boeuf, Berwick, and Bayou Sorrell Locks, Morganza Control Structure, and numerous drainage and flood control structures were operated and maintained. Maintenance by contract: Miscellaneous painting and repair of Berwick Lock initiated Jul. 20, 1981, is 35 percent complete. Maintenance dredging was performed, resulting in the removal of 509,000 cubic yards by one leased cutterhead dredge from Berwick Bay harbor between Sep. 5 and Sep. 30, 1981. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated Aug. 7, 1929, with commencement of the west protection levee from Bordelonville to Hamburg, La. The project is 28 percent complete, based on the current estimated cost of $2,800,000,000 which includes funds for Upper Pointe Coupee Loop area. Of the 449.2 miles of levees and floodwalls authorized for the Atchafalaya system, 236.1 miles are built to grade. See Table 42-K for status of levees. 42-4 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION Major items remaining to be completed include completion of levees to grade and section, channel improvement by dredging to reduce flow line, and bank stabilization. The channel has been enlarged to 60,000 square feet from mile 54.5 to 96.2, and 40,000 square feet from mile 96.2 to 112.3. Enlargement to 100,000 square feet from mile 54.5 to 112.3 remains to be done. Drainage improvements in Upper Pointe Coupee Loop area have not been initiated. Approximately 36.7 miles of bank stabilization have been placed as shown in Table 42-H. BATON ROUGE HARBOR (DEVILS SWAMP), LA. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance by contract: Dredging for the removal of shoal from the entrance channel was performed, resulting in the removal of 103,300 cubic yards between Sep. 2 and Sep. 8, 1981. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction of the first 2.5 miles of the proposed 5.0 miles of channel was initiated in January 1958 and completed in July 1959, with 7,458,086 cubic yards excavated. The project is 16 percent complete, based on the current estimated Federal cost of $699,200 and cash contributions of $650,000. Completion of the remaining 2.5 miles is dependent on economic justification by developments on the initial channel. BAYOU COCODRIE AND TRIBUTARIES, LA. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance by hired labor consisted of condition and operation studies. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated in June 1946 and is 18 percent complete, based on the current estimated cost of $39,500,000. See page 2031, Annual Report for 1961, for description of completed work. Work required to complete the project consists of enlargement of 13.5 miles of upper Bayou Boeuf, channel improvement of 25.3 miles of Bayou Cocodrie, enlargement of Bayou Courtableau from Washington, La., to the west protection levee, and additional culverts through the west protection levee at 100 percent Federal cost in lieu of the previously authorized diversion channel from Washington to the Bayou Courtableau drainage structure. BONNET CARRE' SPILLWAY, LA. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance by hired labor: Condition and operation studies and ordinary maintenance of the control structure and spillway continued. Condition as of Sep. 30. Maintenance by contract: Contract for maintenance repairs to spillway structure, was initiated Aug. 20, 1980, and completed Nov. 18, 1980. Construction of the spillway was initiated in Fiscal Year 1929. The control structure was completed in 1931, levees were completed in 1932, and utility crossings were completed in 1936. The cost of the completed work is $14,212,200. It was necessary to operate the structure to reduce flood stages in 1937, 1945, 1950, 1973 1975, and 1979. LOWER RED RIVER-SOUTH BANK RED RIVER LEVEES, LA. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work by hired labor consisted of engineering studies. New work by contract: A contract for surfacing roads on existing levee crown was awarded Dec. 10, 1980, initiated Jan. 19, 1981, and completed Mar. 10, 1981. Maintenance by hired labor consisted of condition, operation, and engineering studies. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated in Fiscal Year 1929 and is 50 percent complete, based on the current estimated cost of $47,200,000. Of the 59.2 miles of levees authorized, 59.2 miles are complete. (See Table 42-K for status of levees and Table 42-H for status of revetments.) OLD RIVER, LA. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work by hired labor consisted of engineering studies. New work by contract: Old River Control Auxiliary Structure, Phase I construction, awarded Jun. 23, 1981, initiated Jul. 9, 1981, is 25 percent complete. Contract for low sill overbank bridge painting, awarded Jun. 18, 1981, and initiated Jul. 29, 1981, is 58 percent complete. Contract for radar and TV surveillance system at the control structure, awarded Mar. 20, 1981, and initiated Apr. 21, 1981, is 19 percent complete. Maintenance by hired labor consisted of operation and maintenance of the lock and control structures as required, condition and operation studies, maintenance of cleared areas, levee shaping, operation of a picket boat at the inflow channel to the low-sill control structure during high river stages, and engineering studies. Maintenance by contract: During the period Sep. 18 to Sep. 28, 1981, 120,600 cubic yards of shoal were dredged from the lock forebay; contract for the rehabilitation of the stilling basin was initiated Nov. 14, 1980, and completed Dec. 18, 1980. Contract for the overbank structure modifications, confining levees and scour protection, initiated Jun. 12, 1980, is 99 percent complete. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction began September 1955 and is 26 percent complete based on the current estimated Federal cost of $332,000,000. Principal items completed are as follows: Low-sill structure, June 1959; overbank structure, October 1959; levees and levee enlargements, October 1963; inflow and outflow channels, February 1961; navigation lock completed December 1962 and opened to navigation March 1963, at which time Old River was closed to navigation with a rock and earthfill dam; highway approaches and bridge over the lock completed March 1965. Approximately 4.7 miles of bank protection have been constructed at the inflow and outflow channels. (See Table 42-H for details of bank protection.) Principal items remaining to complete the project consist of constructing additional bank protection works, providing additional scour protection in the inflow and outflow channels, an additional gantry crane for the low-sill structure, and construction for the prevention of marine accidents at the lowsill structure. 42-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TECHE VERMILION BASINS, LA. (WATER SUPPLY) Operations and results during fiscal year. New work by hired labor consisted of engineering studies. New work by contract: A contract for Loreauville Canal Navigable Control Structure was awarded Jan. 16, 1981, initiated Mar. 19, 1981, and is 32 percent complete. A contract for construction of a pumping station was initiated May 27, 1980, and is 67 percent complete. A contract for the initial construction of a conveyance channel was initiated Oct. 26, 1979, and was completed Jul. 15, 1981. Contract for the state canal siphon and bypass channel was initiated Oct. 18, 1979, and is 88 percent complete. Condition as of Sep. 30. The project is 67 percent complete based on the current estimated cost of $35,700,000. Construction was authorized by the Flood Control Act of May 15, 1928, as modified by the Flood Control Act of 1966 (Public Law 89-789 approved Nov. 7, 1966) of the following: a low leveed excavated channel on the west bank of the Atchafalaya River north of Krotz Springs; an inverted siphon under Darbonne Bay; a grated control structure in the WABPL; a gated culvert in the berm between Bayou Courtableau and the WABPL borrow pit to the south; a slotted weir in Bayou Fusilier near Arnaudville; and a navigable sector control structure in the Loreauville Canal. Improvements are to provide additional surface water in Bayou Teche, Vermilion River, and the WABPL borrow pit to satisfy the present and future needs for municipal, industrial, and irrigation water supply and to prevent pollution of these streams. Vicksburg District TENSAS BASIN, ARK. AND LA. Operations and results during fiscal year. (a) Boeuf and Tensas Rivers, and Bayou Macon, Ark. and La. Planning and design were continued on project features. Contracts for the pumps and motors, recreational facilities, Connerly Bayou Dam, and Ditch Bayou Dam are under way on the Lake Chicot Pumping Plant Project. The slurry trench, used to control under seepage at the pumping plant, is complete. Work is under way on relocation of the Illinois Central Gulf Railroad bridge located in Reach 3, Big and Colewa Creeks. (b) Red River backwater area. Planning and design continued on project features. The channel improvement contract for Wild Cow Bayou and additional channel work contract for the Tensas-Cocodrie Pumping Plant has been completed. The gravity structure contract is nearing completion, and the pumping plant contract is scheduled for award in late FY 82. Design and right-of-way acquisition are continuing for the remainder of the Tensas-Cocodrie levee. enlargement. Design of the Six Mile Bayou drainage structure and connecting channel has been completed. The Sicily Island Levee Project GDM has been approved and the Vicksburg District has initiated preparation of Item 1 and A1A Plans and Specifications for Sicily Island Levee. Condition as of Sep. 30. (a) Boeuf and Tensas Rivers, and Bayou Macon, Ark. and La. Channel improvement has been accomplished on 744.6 miles of project streams, providing major drainage outlets for the tributary areas. Additional 57.2 miles of channel previously enlarged has been further enlarged and 61.6 miles of the Tensas River have been cleared and snagged. A Phase I GDM study is currently under way to address drainage of lands above mile 61.6. This study is scheduled for completion in FY 82. (b) Red River backwater area. Levees in Tensas-Cocodrie area are complete except for levee raising necessary to conform to the Refined 1973 MR&T Project Flood Flowline on the Mississippi River of which 17.8 miles have been completed. The work comprised 93.1 miles of new levee, excluding 2.1 miles of high ground where no levees are required, and 86.9 miles of gravel road on levees. Construction of 68.6 miles of levee, Larto Lake to Jonesville levee system, has been completed. LOWER ARKANSAS BASIN, ARK. Condition as of Sep. 30. Arkansas River levees. A total of 56.2 miles of the 61.5 miles of north bank levees and all of the 85.4 miles of south bank levees have been completed to approved grade and section. These levees above mile 36.1 are protected by bank-protection works constructed as a feature of project for Arkansas River and tributaries, Ark. and Okla. For present status of this work, see report of Little Rock District. Below mile 36.1, needed bank protection is constructed with project maintenance funds. YAZOO BASIN, MISS. Operations and results during fiscal year. (a) Yazoo City and Belzoni protection works. Hired labor forces continued operation and maintenance of levees, drainage facilities, and pumping plant. (b) Greenwood protection works. Hired labor forces continued operation and maintenance of pumping plant, levees, and drainage facilities. A review of the protection provided to Greenwood and vicinity is under way. Planning is nearly complete and results will be printed in Supplement C to Greenwood Protection Works (GDM #1). A public meeting was conducted on Aug. 18, 1981, at Greenwood, Miss., to present proposed works. (c) Main stem. Planning is under way to provide drainage structure and levee closure at Wasp Lake, Lower Tchula Lake, and Bee Lake. Construction was initiated on Sep. 14, 1981, for Wasp Lake drainage structure and levee closure. Channel maintenance. Random clearing and snagging and herbicide willow control continued, as required, in Coldwater, Tallahatchie, and Yazoo Rivers, and Will M. Whittington Auxiliary Channel. (d) Big Sunflower River. A Phase II GDM for additional work in the Steele Bayou Basin was approved Dec. 20, 1978. A 11.4 mile item of channel improvement is scheduled to begin in early FY 82. (e) Tributaries. Construction: (1) Levees. Construction of Panola-Quitman Floodway, Item C, has been terminated prior to completion. Big Sand Creek Levee Extension, to the hills, and Yalobusha River (left bank) Levee are complete. Plans and specifications are being finalized to upgrade a portion of south Big Sand Creek Levee. Plans and specifications are also being finalized for levee work associated with the last item of 42-6 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION work on Ascalmore-Tippo Project. (2) Channels. Removal of plugs on Alligator-Catfish Bayou channel at the site of recent bridge relocations will complete the Alligator-Catfish channel enlargement project. Controls in Alligator-Catfish channel may be necessary prior to removal of the plugs. A study is under way to evaluate these needs. Plans and specifications are being finalized on new channel work associated with the remaining work on Ascalmore-Tippo Project. (3)Structures. Ascalmore-Tippo, Item 4, closure and overflow structure, and Ascalmore-Tippo, Item 3, Tallahatchie River control structure, are complete. The planning of the Pelucia Creek Levee Project is nearly complete and the results will be printed as Supplement B to the Greenwood Protection Works (GDM #1). Maintenance of channels of Yalobusha, Little Tallahatchie, and Yocona Rivers; Cassidy, David, Burrell, and Bobo Bayous; and Ascalmore Creek, by random clearing and snagging and herbicide willow control, continued. (f) Enid Lake. (See Table 42-C.) Construction of public use facilities is substantially complete. Maintenance of these facilities continued. The dam and appurtenant structures were maintained and operated. Rehabilitation of boat channels and snagging and clearing of tributary streams in the lake area continued. Maximum pool elevation in the lake was 243.8 feet above NGVD on Sep. 16, 1981, when storage in the flood control pool was 182,400 acre-feet. Peak 24 hr. inflow was 6,700 cubic feet per second on Feb. 1, 1981. On Sep. 30, 1981, pool elevation was 242.9 feet above NGVD and storage in the flood control pool was 170,900 acre-feet. (g) Grenada Lake. (See Table 42-C.) Construction and maintenance of public use facilities continued. The dam and appurtenant structures were operated and maintained. Maintenance snagging and clearing of tributary streams in the lake area continued. Maximum pool elevation in the lake was 206.2 feet above NGVD on Jul. 17, 1981, when storage in the flood control pool was 290,300 acre-feet. Peak 24 hour inflow was 12,900 cubic feet per second on Feb. 2, 1981. On Sep. 30, 1981, the pool elevation was 206.1 feet above NGVD and storage in the flood control pool was 287,800 acre-feet. Construction of a levee to provide protection to the community of Coffeeville from high Grenada Lake stages is scheduled to begin in FY 82. In addition to the levee, other features of Coffeeville project include: three drainage structures through the levee; portable pumps; area rehabilitation; and raising of a town street. Construction of the Coffeeville project is scheduled for completion in FY 83. (h) Sardis Lake. (See Table 42-C.) Construction and maintenance of public use facilities continued. The dam and appurtenant structures were maintained and operated. Clearing of tributary streams in the lake area continued. Maximum pool elevation in the lake was 261.5 feet above NGVD on Sep. 4, 1981, when storage in the flood control pool was 662,100 acre-feet. Peak 24 hour inflow was 9,000 cubic feet per second on Mar. 31, 1981. On Sep. 30, 1981, pool elevation was 255.4 feet above NGVD and storage in the flood control pool was 472,200 acre-feet. An 8-mile reach of the Little Tallahatchie River from Sardis Dam to Highway 51 is clogged with sediment which restricts releases from the lake. This reach will be dredged to restore the design capacity of the river. Six disposal sites were selected, located in upland hill areas to reduce the adverse impact on prime agricultural lands along the river and still be in compliance with environmental laws and regulations. Dredging will begin in 1981 and be completed in 1982. (i) Arkabutla Lake. (See Table 42-C.) Construction of public use facilities is substantially complete. Maintenance of these facilities continued. The dam and appurtenant structures were maintained and operated. Clearing of tributary streams in the lake area was continued. Maximum pool elevation in the lake was 228.2 feet above NGVD on Jul. 7, 1981, and storage in flood control pool was 255,500 arce-feet. Peak 24 hour inflow was 19,700 cubic feet per second on Jun. 6, 1981. On Sep. 30, 1981, pool elevation was 219.2 feet above NGVD, and storage in the flood control pool was 112,000 acre-feet. (j) Yazoo Basin backwater. The Yazoo Area backwater levees are complete, including the backwater levee from the Mississippi River levee to the west levee of the lower Auxiliary Channel, the Little Sunflower River drainage structure, and the connecting channel from the Steele Bayou drainage structure to the Big Sunflower River. A Phase I GDM study is scheduled for completion in FY 82 which will address other water resources problems and needs in the area to include urban and rural flood damage prevention, hydropower, and water supply. The Satartia area backwater levee is complete except for a small gap at levee station 169+60. Plans and specifications are being prepared for Structure and Item 1 of the Rocky Bayou Levee System. Completed backwater levees will require raising to provide the degree of protection intended based on the project design flow line developed for the Mississippi River following the 1973 flood. Four of the seven Greentree Reservoirs were completed. Pumping facilities and two of the remaining three reservoirs are scheduled for construction in FY 85. The project is 42 percent complete. (k) Upper Yazoo projects. The first four items of work, approximately 37 miles of channel improvement, beginning .at Yazoo City, Miss., and extending upstream to just south of Silver City, Miss., have been completed. The next item of work, Item 2A-2, consisting of approximately 7 miles of channel improvement is under construction. Planning is continuing on the remainder of Items 2 and 3. (1) Streambank erosion control. Construction of the following projects has been completed: Tillatoba and Hunter Creeks, Items 1 and 2; Hunter Creek 1A; South Fork Tillatoba Creek, Items 5A and 5B; North Fork Tillatoba Creek, Items A and 3A; Batupam Boque, Items 4A, 4A-1, and 4A-2; Perry Creek, Items 6A and 6B; Johnson Creek, Items 9A, 9B, and vegetative treatment, Item 12; Goodwin Creek, Items 8A, 8B, and 8C; and Hotopha Creek, Item 7. All construction under this feature is complete and a final report is scheduled for submission to Congress in December 1981. Data collection, monitoring, and evaluation of completed projects will continue through Fiscal Year 1983. Condition as of Sep. 30. The first feature of Yazoo Basin project was started in 1936, and the total project is about 35 percent complete. A total of 47.9 miles of backwater levee has been completed to the interim grade. The ongoing Yazoo Basin Comprehensive Study will address other water resources problems and needs in the area to include urban and rural flood damage prevention, hydropower, and water supply. 42-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 Memphis District ST. FRANCIS BASIN, ARK. AND MO. Operations and results during fiscal year. (a) Little River drainage. Contract for construction of two county bridges, Castor River, Item 1, was completed. A contract for construction of a county bridge at mile 9.45, Castor River, was awarded and completed. Two contracts for construction of three county bridges across Ditch 19, Item 2, at miles 20.6, 25.7, and 26.98 were awarded and completed. A contract for construction of a county bridge across Ditch 19, Item 2, at mile 13.67 was awarded and is 13 percent complete. A contract for channel excavation, Castor River, Item 1, Parcel 1, was awarded and is 19 percent complete. A contract for channel excavation, Ditch 19, Item 2, Parcel 1, was awarded and is 1 percent completed. A contract for scour repair at Dirch 81 Control Structure was completed. (b) Upper St. Francis River and Oak Donnick Floodway. Two contracts for construction of one state and one county bridge across Ditch 21A were completed. A contract for construction of a county bridge across Ditch 63, Rivervale, was awarded and completed. A contract for Low Flow Restoration for the St. Francis River was completed. Contract for excavation of Ditch 27 and Tributaries was awarded; however, construction has not yet begun. Contract for construction of Inter-River Culvert was completed. Contract for erosion control, Dam 10 was completed. Contract for channel cleanout, below North End Control Structure was completed. Contract for scour repairs, Wappapello to Crowley's Ridge, was completed. Contract for landside ditch cleanout below Locust Creek was awarded; contract is 8 percent completed. Contract for gravel resurfacing State Line Degraded Levee was completed. Contract for scour repair, Oak Donnick Floodway Levee, was awarded; work has not begun. Contract for construction of Drainage District 17 Pumping Plant is under way and is 99 percent completed. (c) Lower St. Francis River. Reimbursable contracts for alterations of a Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railroad bridge across Blackfish Bayou, Item 2, and the relocation of two St. Francis County Roads along Blackfish Bayou, Item 2, is in Phase II construction; work has not begun. Reimbursable contract for alteration of four county bridges, Big Creek, Item 2, is 34 percent completed. Contract for channel enlargement and diversion, Item No. 1, Big Creek, is under way and is 98 percent completed. Contract for gravel surfacing of levee, Highway 63 to Highway 42, was completed. Two contracts for landside ditch culvert installation, below Marianna above Haleside Levees, Parts I and II, were initiated and are 51 and 19 percent complete, respectively. One contract for emergency repairs to U.S. Highway 63 Bridge across Ditch 61 was completed; a second contract was awarded; however, work has not yet begun. Two contracts for scour repair, W. G. Huxtable Pumping Plant, inlet and outlet, were awarded and completed. Contract for construction of dewatering wells at W. G. Huxtable Pumping Plant was completed. Condition as of Sep. 30. (a) Little River Drainage. Project was initiated during 1938 and is 66 percent complete. (b), (c), and (d) St. Francis River and Tributaries (Upper and Lower). Project was initiated during 1937 and is 57 percent complete. (e) Wappapello Lake, Mo. Project was initiated in 1938 and completed in 1941. LOWER WHITE RIVER Operations and results during fiscal year. (a) Augusta to Clarendon Levee. There were no contracts awarded or completed during the fiscal year. (b) Clarendon Levee. There were no contracts awarded or completed. Condition as of Sep. 30. (a) Augusta to Clarendon Levee. Project was initiated during 1946 and is 39 percent complete. (b) Clarendon Levee. Project was initiated during 1972 and is 36 percent complete. CACHE BASIN, ARK. Operations and results during fiscal year. No contracts awarded or completed during the fiscal year. Condition as of Sep. 30. Project was initiated during 1971 and is 4 percent complete. REELFOOT LAKE-LAKE NO. 9, TENN. AND KY. Operations and results during fiscal year. No contracts awarded or completed during the fiscal year. Condition as of Sep. 30. Project was initiated during 1974 and is 81 percent complete. WEST TENNESSEE TRIBUTARIES, TENN. Operations and results during fiscal year. (a) Obion River, Tenn. Reimbursable contract for alteration of Illinois Central Gulf Railroad bridges across South and Middle Forks, Obion River, is essentially complete (remaining work, installing sway bracing, will be performed after channel excavation under the bridges has been completed by others). (b) Forked Deer River, Tenn. Reimbursable contract for alteration of Illinois Central Gulf Railroad bridges across North and South Forks, Forked Deer River, is in progress and is 82 percent complete. Condition as of Sep. 30. (a) Obion River, Tenn. Project was initiated during 1961 and is 25 percent complete. (b) Forked Deer River, Tenn. Project was initiated during 1966 and is 15 percent complete. WEST KENTUCKY TRIBUTARIES, KY. Operations and results during fiscal year. Reimbursable contract for alterations of Illinois Central Gulf Railroad bridge across Obion Creek, Item No. 3, is under way. Phase I planning is complete, but construction has not started. However, the Interstate Commerce Commission has authorized the abandonment of this bridge. Condition as of Sep. 30. Project was initiated during 1978 and is 4 percent complete. 42-8 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-A MISSISSIPPI RIVER IMPROVEMENTS Mileage Above Head of Passes Locality Improvement Remarks 0-9571 10-81 11-25 38 45 Head of Passes, La.-Cairo, Ill. The Jump-New Orleans, La. Baptiste Collette-Bayou Ostrica, La. Homeplace, La. Bohemia, La. Myrtle Grove, La. Scarsdale, La. Bohemia, La.-New Orleans, La. New Orleans, La. New Orleans, La. New Orleans-Morganza, La. New Orleans-Baton Rouge, La. Bonnet Carrd Floodway, La. Baton Rouge Harbor Morganza Floodway, La. Morganza-Old River, La. Old River, La., control Old River-Cypress Creek, Ark. Vicksburg Harbor, Miss. Vicksburg-Lake View, Miss. Wilson Point, La. Greenville Harbor, Miss. Dredging, revetment, and contraction work Main line levee, right bank Main line setback, left bank Salinity control structure, right bank Salinity control structure, left bank Salinity control structure, right bank Salinity control structure, left bank Main line levee and floodwall, left bank Main line levee, right bank Main line levee and floodwall, left bank Main line levee, right bank Main line levee and floodwall, left bank Regulating spillway, left bank Devils Swamp barge channel Regulating spillway, right bank Main line levee, right bank Levee closure and enlargement, low and high water spillway structures, navigation lock, and approach channels, right bank Main line levee, right bank Harbor extension and industrial fill Main line levee, left bank Pumping Plant and drainage structure, right bank Harbor improvements and port area 42-9 Authorized by Public Law 89-298 (HD 308/74/1). Included in Miss. Delta Region, La. feature. Authorized by Public Law 89-298 (HD 308/74/1). Included in Miss. Delta Region, La. feature. Authorized by Public Law 89-298 (HD 308/74/1). Included in Miss. Delta Region, La. feature. Authorized by Public Law 89-298 (HD 308/74/1). Included in Miss. Delta Region, La. feature. Authorized by Public Law 81-516. Authorized by Public Law 81-516. Modified by Public Law 87-874. Extends up south bank of Old River to Barbre Landing. Authorized by Public Law 83-780. Joins Arkansas River, south bank levee. Authorized by Public Law 70-391. Modified by Public Laws 79-526 and 83-780. Unpublished Vicksburg District's MRC report approved Apr. 14, 19662 Authorized by Public Law 85-500. 59 44-91 81-96 91-104 96-279 101-234 127-129 235 279-287 287-303 303-314 306-572 437 437-721 490 537 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 42-A MISSISSIPPI RIVER IMPROVEMENTS (Continued) Mileage Above Head of Passes Locality Improvement Remarks 646 Long Lake, Helena, Ark. Culvert and floodgate, right Authorized by Public bank Law 79-526.2 605-666 Henrico-Helena, Ark. Main line levee and floodwall, right bank 672-993 St. Francis River- Main line levee, right bank Commerce, Mo.3 722-725 Industrial levee (Ensley Levee and pumping station Bottoms) 721-734 Memphis Harbor, Tenn. Closure of Tennessee Chute, in- Authorized by Public dustrial fill, levee, harbor Law 79-526. channels, etc. 803-873 Tiptonville-Obion River Main line levee, left bank, levee Modified by Acts extension, and diversion of Jul. 24, 1946 Obion River and Dec. 23, 1971. 857 Near Mud Lake, Tenn. Pumping station and adjacent Authorized Dec. 15 channel improvements and 17, 1970 under Sec. 201 of Oct. 27, 1965 FC Act. 890 St. Johns Bayou, Mo. Drainage floodgate and levee Modified by Jul. 24, closure 1946 Act. 890 New Madrid Flood- Drainage floodgate and levee Modified by Sep. 3, way, Mo. closure 1954 Act. 890-954 New Madrid-Birds Floodway, right bank Point, Mo. 902-922 Slough Bend, Hickman, Ky. Main line levee, left bank 922 Hickman, Ky. Floodwall, left bank 946 Peafield, Mo. Drainage floodgate Authorized by Sep. 3, 1954 Act. 9571 Cairo, Cairo drainage district Floodwalls and levees 9571 Cairo, Cairo drainage district, Floodwalls, levees, and pump- Mounds, Mound City, ing plant and vicinity Thebes-Rock Island, Ill. Levees, both banks Intermittent (Sec. 6) Cape Girardeau, Mo., to Levees Intermittent (Sec. 6). Rock Island, Ill. 1. Cairo, Ill., is on Ohio River about 3 miles above its mouth 3. Commerce, Mo., is on Upper Mississippi River, 39 miles above (Mississippi River mile 954 AHP). mouth of Ohio River. 2. Also see Table 42-D, "Authorizing Legislation." 42-10 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-B MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY AND OUTLET IMPROVEMENTS Mileage Below Head of Atchafalaya River Locality Improvement Remarks 0-54 27-54 54-117 20-27 25-117 27 0-27 31-57 80 53-117 117 117-129 117-129 105 105-120 115 116 5 5-105 29 Floodway Floodway Floodway ATCHAFALAYA BASIN, LA.' Atchafalaya Basin. Morganza and West Atchafalaya Floodways West Atchafalaya Floodway between Red River and Alabama Bayou Morganza Floodway between Mississippi River and Alabama Bayou Atchafalaya Basin Floodway between Alabama Bayou and Morgan City East protection levee (Morganza and Atchafalaya Floodways) Lacour-Red Cross Morganza-Morgan City Bayou Latenache Upper Pointe Coupee Loop area Bayou Fordoche-Ramah Bayou Sorrell Bayou Sorrel Lock-Morgan City Morgan City Below Morgan City Below Morgan City Atchafalaya Basin Floodway lower protection levee Calumet Below Morgan City Berwick' Patterson West protection levee (Atchafalaya Basin and West Atchafalaya Flood ways) Simmesport-Hamburg Mansura to Wax Lake Outlet Coulee des Grues West Atchafalaya Floodway Including lower Morganza Floodway guide levee. Through upper Morganza guide levee and enlargement of outlet channel. Enlargement of Bayou Latenache. Approved Jun. 4, 1970. See Table 42-D. Levee landside borrow pit. Alternate route, Gulf Intracoastal Waterway Port Allen to Morgan City. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway utilizes levee west side borrow pit channel Gulf Intracoastal Waterway. Bypass route for Gulf Intracoastal Waterway. East of lower river. Bayou Teche-Wax Lake Outlet. Inclosed area between Wax Lake Outlet anti Berwick. Lower Atchafalaya River. Adjustment to provide fresh water. West Atchafalaya Floodway. 42-11 Levee, upper Morganza guide Levee and Morgan City floodwall Drainage structure, Pointe Coupee, and channel enlargement Additional drainage facilities Drainage channel Lock Alternate navigation channel, Gulf Intracoastal Waterway Lock in Bayou Boeuf' Channel relocation Levees, floodwall Floodgate, east Levees, floodwall, drainage structures, and pumping plants Lock Water system Levee fuse plug Protection levee Levee enlargement and floodgate extension Railway REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 42-B MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY AND (Continued) OUTLET IMPROVEMENTS Mileage Below Head of Atchafalaya River Locality Improvement Remarks 29 40 40 40 41 41 41 94 Morganza Floodway Bayou Darbonne West Atchafalaya Floodway Morganza Floodway Bayou Courtableau West Atchafalaya Floodway Morganza Floodway Charenton Jaws-Lake Fausse Pointe Calumet Wax Lake Outlet Atchafalaya River Barbre Landing-Alabama Bayou Simmesport Simmesport-Bayou Garofier Melville Krotz Springs Below Alabama Bayou Mississippi River-Morgan City TECHE-VERMILION BASINS, LA. Atchafalaya River to Teche- Vermilion Basins Courtableau Basin, La., and outlets Charenton Canal West Atchafalaya protection levee borrow pit channel Bayou Courtableau spillway Bayou des Glaises BAYOU COCODRIE AND TRIBUTARIES Bayou Courtableau Bayou Cocodrie Bayous Cocodrie-Bouef diversion Bayou Boeuf Through West Atchafalaya protection levee. Borrow pit channel to Grand Lake through West Atchafalaya protection levee. Restoration of drainage west of West Atchafalaya Basin protection levee. Bayou Teche and Wax Lake Outlet. To lower flood heights. Railway Gated drainage structures Highway Highway Gated drainage control structures and channels Railway Railway Floodgate and approach channels Outlet, Charenton drainage canal and protection levee Floodgate, west Drainage canal-railway and highway bridges East bank, levee Levee, ring, and drainage structure West bank, levee Levee, ring Levee, ring Channel enlargement 12- by 125-foot navigation channel Pumping station above Krotz Springs, conveyance channels, and appurtenant works Drainage channel Drainage channel Drainage control structure Diversion channel Enlargement and additional culverts Enlargement and realinement New channel New channel 42-12 Increase channel capacities to decrease flood heights. Through Grand and Six Mile Lakes. Freshwater distribution from Atchafalaya River to Teche- Vermilion Basins. Outlet to gulf. Intercepting drainage channel. Washington to west protection levee 94 105 105 0-54 5-6 5-66 28-30 40-41 54-117 94-106 Mileage Above Mouth 0-8 50-133 96 133 0-17 17-40 40-51 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-B MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY AND (Continued) OUTLET IMPROVEMENTS Mileage Above Mouth Locality Improvement Remarks 51-60 Bayous Boeuf-Rapides New channel 17-42 87-107 40 60 87 82-145 3-56 3-56 56 56 Enlargement, clearing, and snagging Enlargement, realinement, clearing, and snagging Fixed elevation weir Gated drainage structure Gated drainage structure Railway, highway, and local road bridges, and pipeline crossing Flood protection diversion Upper Cocodrie Bayou Boeuf Bayou Lamourie to Kincaid Structures Lecompte Control Structure Bayou Rapides Control Structure Bayou Lamourie Control Structure Various LAKE PONTCHARTRAIN, LA. Lake Pontchartrain, Jefferson Parish, La. AMITE RIVER, LA. Amite River, La. LOWER RED RIVER, SOUTH BANK, RED RIVER LEVEES, LA. Moncla-Hotwells Red River-Moncla to Lake Long EASTERN RAPIDES AND SOUTH-CENTRAL AVOYELLES PARISHES, LA. Eastern Rapides and south-central Avoyelles Parishes, La. TENSAS BASIN, ARK. AND LA. Red River backwater area Tensas-Cocodrie area Larto Lake-Jonesville Sicily Island area Below Red River area Black River, La. Six Mile Bayou area Jonesville, La. Ouachita River (23) Authorized by Public Law 81-516. Eliminated by Public Law 89-298. Intermittent (Sec. 6). Authorized by Public Law 91-611. (4) (4) (4) (4) Unpublished VXD-MRC Letter Report dated May 31, 1977. MR&T authority.2 Portion of levee built under Sec. 6. Incorporated in MR&T by Public Law 81-516.2 Monroe to Sandy Bayou and Bawcomville (Sec. 6). 42-13 Bank protection Levee, south bank Levees Flood protection and drainage improvement Levees, drainage channels, structures, and pumping plant Levees, drainage channels, and structures Levees, drainage channels, and structures Levees, drainage channels, and structures Drainage structure and appurtenant channel works Levees, floodwall, pumping plant, and interior drainage Levees, drainage channels, and structures REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 42-B MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY AND (Continued) OUTLET IMPROVEMENTS Mileage Above Mouth Locality Improvement Remarks 0-32 0-56 151-235 210-286 286-296 0-75 0-8 0-7 0-33 0-10 0-9 0-14 0-170 0-34 0-35 Lake Chicot 0-6 0-160 0-16 0-0.2 23-98 35-98 48-102 0-75 0-381 75-366 Clearing Channel improvement and realinement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvements Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement To divert flows from Lake Chicot Boeuf and Tensas Rivers and Bayou Macon, Ark. and La. Boeuf River, Ark. and La. Below Bayou LaFourche Bayou LaFourche Boeuf River, Ark. and La., above Bayou LaFourche Canal 19 Canal 19 extension Big and Colewa Creeks Tributaries of Boeuf River- Canal 19 Fleschmans Bayou Caney Bayou Big Bayou Canal 18 Kirsch Lake Canal Black Pond Slough Bayou Macon, Ark. and La. Bayou Macon Canal 43 Canal 81 Pumping plant and drainage structure Tributary of Bayou Macon Rush Bayou Tensas River, Ark. and La. Tensas River Tributary of Tensas River Mill and Vidal Bayous Grant's Canal, La. Grant's Canal at Lake Providence LOWER ARKANSAS RIVER, ARK. Yancopin-Pine Bluff Fletcher Bend, Ark., to Pine Bluff North Little Rock to Gillett (below Plum Bayou) GRAND PRAIRIE-BAYOU METO, ARK. Grand Prairie Region and Bayou Meto Basin, Ark. YAZOO BASIN, MISS. Yazoo Backwater area Yazoo River System below Arkabutla Lake Yazoo River between Yazoo City and Prichard Channel improvement Channel improvement Filling canal Levee, south bank Revetment Levee, north bank Water supply and drainage improvements Levees and pumping plants Channel improvement Levees, right bank (5) (5) Authorized by Public Laws 78-534 and 79-526.23 (5) (6) Authorized by Public Law 78-534. 3 (6) (6) (5) (6) (6) (6) See Table 42-E. (5) (5) Authorized by Public Law 90-483. (6) Authorized by Public Law 78-534. 3 Authorized by Public Law 89-298. Authorized by Public Law 81-516. (5) Authorized by Public Law 81-516. Including Tallahatchie and Coldwater Rivers. Intermittent. 42-14 Clearing MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-B MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY AND (Continued) OUTLET IMPROVEMENTS Mileage Above Mouth Locality Improvement Remarks 75-345 Yazoo River between Yazoo Levees, left bank Intermittent. 45-109 Floodway channel 75 City and Askew Will M. Whittington Auxiliary Channel Yazoo City protection Rocky Bayou area Belzoni protection Greenwood protection Arkabutla Lake Yalobusha River below Grenada Lake Grenada Lake Tallahatchie River-Little Tallahatchie River Little Tallahatchie River below Sardis Lake Sardis Lake Yocona River below Enid Lake Enid Lake Cassidy Bayou below Old Coldwater River Upper Yazoo Projects Area between main stem and hills including Bobo Bayou McKinney Bayou Alligator-Catfish Bayous Bear Creek Whiteoak Bayou Tallahatchie River, Miss. Big Sunflower River, etc. Big Sunflower River Hull Brake-Mill Creek Canal Hushpuckena River Quiver River Gin and Muddy Bayous, Miss. Bogue Phalia 42-15 Levee, drainage structure, and pumping plant Channel clearing and enlargement Levee and floodwall Levees, channel improvement, drainage structures, and pumping plants Flood detention and conservation Channel improvement Flood detention and conservation Levees, Panola-Quitman Floodway Channel improvement Flood detention and conservation Channel improvement Flood detention and conservation Channel improvement Floodway channel Levees and channel improvement Channel improvement and enlargement of pumping plant Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Two road crossings of Panola- Quitman Floodway, Miss., and for protection of Sheley Bridge Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Improvement of 7.8 miles was approved Apr. 29, 1970. See Table 42-C. See Table 42-C. See Table 42-C. See Table 42-C. Including Moores Bayou, Cutoff Bayou, Whiting Lake and outlet. Authorized by Public Law 79-526. Authorized by Public Law 79-526. Authorized by Public Law 89-298. As modified in GDM in 1967. Authorized by Public Law 89-298. Authorized by Public Law 89-298. Authorized by Public Law 90-147. Authorized by Public Law 78-534. 3 Authorized by Public Law 87-874. Authorized by Public Law 78-534. 3 127 185 381 0-64 64 0-24 0-26 26 0-13 13 0-88 137-260 75-381 0-8.3 0-23 0-42 275-290 0-204 0-8 0-28 0-81 0-43 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 42-B MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY AND OUTLET IMPROVEMENTS Mileage Above Mouth Locality Improvement Remarks 0-4 Ditchlow Bayou Channel improvement Authorized by Public Little Sunflower River Deer Creek 0-27 153-160 0-68 13-55 0-68 99 108-192 122 143 0-196 0-90 260 0-225 225 0-105 86 0-36 0-29 0-17 0-12 0-108 Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Water-control structure Levee, backwater including outlet Pumping plant Channel improvement and structures Levee and outlet structures Levees, outlet structures Levee, outlet structure, and pumping station Levee, outlet structure, and pumping station Channel improvement and structures Channel improvement and structures Channel improvement and two outlet structures Floodway, levees, drainage channels, and structures Flood detention and conservation Floodway, levees, drainage channels, and structures Marked Tree Siphon Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement and pumping station Channel improvement Law 78-534. 3 Authorized by Public Law 78-534. 3 Authorized by Public Law 78-534.3 Authorized by Public Law 78-534. 3 Modified in December 1970. See Table 42-D. Approved Mar. 3, 1970. See Table 42-D. Mile 605-645 Mississippi River (6) Authorized by Public Law 89-298. Authorized by Public Law 89-298. (5) (5) Authorized by Public Law 81-516. Authorized by Public Law 81-516. Authorized by Public Law 81-516. Authorized Dec. 16, 1975. See Table 42-D. See Table 42-C. Authorized by Public Law 90-483. Authorized by Public Law 90-483. Authorized by Public Law 80-858. 42-16 Steele Bayou Muddy Bayou LOWER WHITE RIVER AND BASIN, ARK. Laconia Circle-Old Town Lake Big Creek and tributaries Clarendon levee Augusta to Clarendon De Valls Bluff Des Arc, Ark. CACHE BASIN, ARK. Cache River, Ark. Bayou DeView, Ark. ST. FRANCIS RIVER AND BASIN, ARK. AND MO. Inter-River Drainage District in Missouri Mouth of St. Francis River- Wappapello Dam Wappapello Lake Little River Basin Marked Tree, Ark. Tyronza River Big Slough Ditch Mayo Ditch Cross County Ditch Belle Fountain Ditch Drainage District No. 17 L'ANGUILLE RIVER, ARK. L'Anguille River and tributaries, Brushy and First Creeks MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-B MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY AND OUTLET IMPROVEMENTS Mileage Above Mouth Locality Improvement Remarks 0-25 WEST TENNESSEE TRIBUTARIES Wolf River and tributaries, Tenn. Obion River and tributaries, North, South, Middle, and Rutherford Forks Forked Deer River and tributaries, North, Middle, and South Forks Mud Lake Pumping Station, Tenn. Harris Fork Creek, Tenn. and Ky. Porter Gap, Tenn. REELFOOT LAKE-LAKE NO. 9, TENN. AND KY. 0-20 Running Reelfoot Bayou, Tenn. 0-15 Bayou du Chien and Lake No. 9, Ky. and Tenn. WEST KENTUCKY TRIBUTARIES, KY. 0-47 Obion Creek, Ky. LITTLE RIVER DIVERSION CHANNEL, MO. Delta to Ancell, Mo. MISSOURI RIVER, MO. 0-28 Mouth to St. Charles, Mo. ILLINOIS RIVER, ILL. 0-120 Mouth to Havana, Ill. OHIO RIVER, ILL. AND KY. Cairo to Mound City and Mounds, Ill. 1. General data concerning Bayou Boeuf, Bayou Sorrel, and Berwick locks where Atchafalaya Basin protection levees cross Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, alternate route to Plaquemine, La., and lower Atchafalaya River (extension of Bayou Teche Waterway), respectively, are in report of New Orleans District. 2. Also see Table 42-D, "Authorizing Legislation." Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Pumping plant Flood control improvements Construction to main-stem standards, levee and appurtanent structures for flood control Channel improvement Channel improvements and pumping station Channel improvement Levees Levees Levees (6) Authorized by 1948 Flood Control Act. Authorized by 1948 Flood Control Act. Authorized by Resolutions Dec. 15 and 17, 19702 Authorized by Water Resources Act of Oct. 22, 1976.2 Section 102, 1976.2 Section 183, 1976.2 Authorized by Public Law 83-780. Authorized in December 1970, See Table 42-D. Authorized by Public Law 89-298. Mile 49 above Cairo. Intermittent (Sec. 6). Intermittent (Sec. 6). Floodwall, levee, revetment, and pumping plant 3. Public Law 81-516 modified requirements of local cooperation. 4. Authorized by Public Law 77-228. Modified by Public Law 89- 298. 5. Authorized or incorporated in MR&T by Public Law 79-526.3 See Table 42-D. 6. Authorized by Public Law 85-500. 42-17 42-17 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 42-C MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY DAMS AND LAKES Grenada Enid Sardis Arkabutla Wappapello Name' Lake Lake Lake Lake Lake River Yalobusha Yocona Little Tallahatchie Coldwater St. Francis Nearest town to damsite Grenada Enid Sardis Arkabutla Wappapello Drainage area, square miles 1,320 560 1,545 1,000 1,310 Conservation pool: Area, thousand acres 10 6 11 5 4 Volume, thousand acre-feet 86 58 108 31 31 Elevation, feet, NGVD 193 230 236.0 209.3 354.7 Flood control pool: Area, thousand acres 65 28 58.5 33 23 Volume, thousand acre-feet 1,252 602 1,462 494 582 Runoff, inches 17.8 20.2 17.7 9.3 8.4 Outlet gates: Number 3 2 4 3 3 Size, feet 7.5 by 14 8 by 16 6 by 12 8.5 by 19 10 by 20 Capacity, thousand cubic feet per second 10.7 9.4 10.0 10.0 18.0 Spillway: Type, uncontrolled Chute Chute Chute Chute Gravity Length, feet 200 200 400 300 740 Elevation, crest, feet, NGVD 231 268 281.4 238.3 394.7 Discharge capacity, thousand cubic 52 50 132 89 229 feet per second Surcharge pool: Area, thousand acres 106 41 90 63 32 Volume, thousand acre-feet 1,385 554 1,447 858 521 Runoff, inches 19.7 18.5 17.6 16.1 7.5 Elevation, feet, NGVD 247.5 284.0 301.0 256.3 413.7 Dam: Type, earthfill Rolled Rolled Hydraulic Rolled Rolled Length, thousand feet 13.9 8.4 15.3 11.5 2.7 Elevation, crest, feet, NGVD 256.0 293.0 311.4 264.3 419.7 1. Grenada, Enid, Sardis andArkabutla Lakes are in Yazoo River Basin, Miss.; Wappapello Lake is in St. Francis River Basin, Mo. 42-18 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-D AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Actor Authorization Work Authorized Document May 15, 1928 H. Doc. 90, 70th Cong., 1st sess. Jun. 19, 1930 Feb. 15, 1933 Apr. 23, 1934 Aug. 30, 1935 Jun. 15, 1936 Aug. 28, 1937 Jun. 28, 1938 Aug. 18, 1941 Dec. 22, 1944 Jul. 24, 1946 42-19 Flood protection in alluvial valley of Mississippi River, revetment and contraction works and dredging to provide least channel depth of 9 feet and width of 300 feet below Cairo. Provided for allotment of the balance of emergency rescue funds to reimburse levee districts and others for expenditures in flood-control works during the 1927 and subsequent floods. Provided for ownership of lands in Bonnet Carrd Spillway and Floodway with proviso for granting rights-of-way, easements, and permits, in said lands. Authorized payment for purchase of, or to reimburse states and local levee districts for the cost of, levee rightsof- way for flood control work in the Mississippi Valley, and for other purposes. Improvement of Wolf and Nonconnah Rivers, Tenn. (Nonconnah Creek is correct title) Improvement of Wolf River (Memphis Harbor), Tenn. Modification of the 1928 Act to provide for: Construction of a backwater levee at mouth of White River, Ark. Construction of Eudora floodway in lieu of Boeuf floodway; flood control, Yazoo River; construction of Morganza floodway; and an outlet to the Gulf of Mexico west of Berwick, La., including a 6-year program for the improvement and regularization of the Mississippi River between Arkansas and Red Rivers, and Atchafalaya River; and construction of roads on levees and drainage adjustments incident to floodway levees. Provided for construction of floodwalls, levees, and revetments along Wolf River and Nonconnah Creek for protection of Memphis, Tenn. Modify the Yazoo River project to substitute a combined reservoir floodway and levee plan. Construction of Mounds to Mound City levee and control works along Cache River, Ill. Modification of previous act pertaining to floodways and outlets and lands therein; including program for the improvement and regularization of the Mississippi River, between Cairo and Arkansas River, extension of levee road system; strengthening of levees. Enlarge main line levees to offset abandonment of floodways between Arkansas and Red Rivers, flood control works in backwater areas of Yazoo and Red Rivers, and in Bayous Rapides, Boeuf, and Cocodrie, La. Navigation channel 12 feet deep and 300 feet wide between Baton Rouge and Cairo; flood protection of Yazoo River Backwater Area in vicinity of Satartia, Miss. Continue prosecution of channel improvement and stabilization program, $200 million. Flood control on the Big Sunflower, Little Sunflower, Hushpuckena, and Quiver Rivers and their tributaries, and on Hull Brake-Mill Creek Canal, Bogue Phalia, Ditchlow Bayou, Deer Creek, and Steele Bayou, Miss.' Improve Boeuf and Tensas Rivers and Bayou Macon, Ark.' Improve Bayou Lafourche, La. Improve Yazoo River tributaries. North bank, Arkansas River levees (below Plum Bayou).' Public 395, 71st Cong., 2d sess. Public 351, 72d Cong. Public 171, 73d Cong. R&H Comm. Doc. 26, 72d Cong., 1st sess. R&H Comm. Doc. 45, 74th Cong., 1st sess. Unpublished report dated Apr. 2, 1925. H. Comm. on Flood Control, Doc. 1, 74th Cong., 1st sess. Unpublished report on record in OCE. H. Comm. on Flood Control, Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Comm. on Flood Control, Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 359, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 509, 78th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 534, 78th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 516, 78th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 151, 78th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 191, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 516, 78th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 308, 74th Cong., 1st sess. REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 42-D AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Actor Authorization Work Authorized Levees on White River (Augusta to Clarendon).' Bayou des Glaises diversion channel, La.' Modify local cooperation requirements in St. Francis and Yazoo Basins. Tiptonville-Obion levee and drainage improvements.' Improvement of St. Johns Bayou, Mo. Big Sunflower River, etc.' Tennessee Chute (Memphis Harbor), Tenn. Continue prosecution of project for flood control and channel improvement, $100 million. Improve Mississippi River below Cape Girardeau, Mo., with respect to West Tennessee tributaries. Improve L'Anguille River, Ark. Baton Rouge Harbor (Devils Swamp), La.' Flood protection at Des Arc, Ark. Improve St. Francis River and Basin, Ark. and Mo. Improve Cache River and Bayou DeView, Ark. and Mo. Improve Grand Prairie Region and Bayou Meto Basin, Ark. Flood protection, Lake Pontchartrain, Jefferson Parish, La.' Filling Grant's Canal, Lake Providence, La. Additional protection to Red River Backwater Area. Extend Federal jurisdiction to cover levees in Orleans Parish, La. Bank protection, Amite River, La. Continue prosecution of project for flood control and channel improvement, $200 million. Jonesville, La., levee, retaining wall, and drainage structure.' Modify requirements for local cooperation in White River Backwater Area, Ark. Navigation improvement of Atchafalaya from Mississippi River to Morgan City, La. Modify project for Vicksburg-Yazoo Area (Harbor), Miss. Improve New Madrid Floodway, Mo., including Peafield drainage floodgate. Control of Old and Atchafalaya Rivers and a lock for navigation. Improve Reelfoot Lake area, Ky. and Tenn. Improve Greenville Harbor, Miss. Extensions to project for Boeuf and Tensas Rivers and Bayou Macon in Arkansas. 42-20 Jun. 30, 1948 May 17, 1950 Oct. 30, 1951 Sep. 3, 1954 Jul. 3, 1958 Document H. Doc. 98, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 602, 79th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 526, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 757, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 138, 80th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 516, 78th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 51, 80th Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 526, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 627, 80th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 651, 80th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 321, 80th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 485, 81st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 132, 81st Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 88, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 255, 81st Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 139, 81st Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 516, 81st Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 516, 81st Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 516, 81st Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 516, 81st Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 516, 81st Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 117, 81st Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 237, 82d Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 53, 82d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 85, 83d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 183, 83d Cong.. 1st sess. H. Doc. 478, 83d Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 160. 83d Cong., 2d sess. S. I)oc. 15. 86th (ong.. 1st sess. H. I)oc. 108. 85th ('ong., 1st sess. MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-D AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Actor Authorization Work Authorized Document White River backwater area pumping plant. S. Doc. 26, 85th Cong., Jul. 14, 1960 Oct. 23, 1962 Jun. 18, 1965 Oct. 27, 1965 Apr. 14, 19662 Nov. 7, 1966 Nov. 20, 1967 Aug. 13, 1968 Sep. 10, 19683 Mar. 3, 19703 Apr. 29, 19703 Jun. 4, 19703 Wolf River and tributaries for flood protection in Tennessee. Continue prosecution of project for channel improvement-$50 million. Modification-Baton Rouge Harbor (Devils Swamp), La. Construct improvements in Gin and Muddy Bayous, Yazoo River Basin, Miss. Replace 2 bridges with adequate floodway over Boeuf River and Big Bayou in Boeuf Basin, Ark. Continue prosecution of project for flood control and channel improvement, $53 million. Modify and expand levees and channel improvement features of main stem project. Modify flood control improvements in following tributary areas and basins: Cairo-Mounds-Mounds City, St. Francis, Lower White, Boeuf-Tensas-Macon, Red River backwater, Yazoo headwater, Grand Prairie, and Bayou Meto. Acquire any modified easements required in New Madrid Floodway as provided by Sec. 4 of May 15, 1928 act. Operate and maintain pumping plant in Red River backwater area (Tensas-Cocodrie Pumping Plant). Provide improvements in West Kentucky tributaries. Provide fish and wildlife facilities in St. Francis and Big Sunflower Basins; Yazoo Headwater and Backwater Areas; and Mississippi Delta region. Deauthorize Amite River, La., project. Modify St. Francis River, Mo. and Ark., project within District No. 7, Poinsett County, Ark. Provide pumping plant and drainage structure at Wilson Point, La. Construction of improvements to supplement freshwater supply in Teche-Vermilion Basins in Louisiana. Bank revetment for protection of existing industrial facilities along Mississippi River below Baton Rouge, La. Modification of West Tennessee tributaries feature to provide relocation of gas transmission lines at Federal expense. Continue emergency work, $87,135,000, which includes $100,000 for road crossing of Panola-Quitman Floodway, Miss., and $80,000 for protection of Sheley Bridge, Tallahatchie River, Miss. Improvements in Boeuf and Tensas Rivers and Bayou Macon Basin to divert flows that would otherwise enter Lake Chicot, Ark. Improvements in the Belle Fountain ditch and tributaries, Mo., and Drainage District No. 17, Ark. Provide pumping plants and other drainage facilities in Cairo, Ill., and vicinity. Modification of Yazoo Headwater Project to include cleanout along David Bayou, Miss. Modify Yazoo Backwater feature to include a control structure in Muddy Bayou, Miss. Modification of Yazoo Headwater Project to include drainage structure and channel improvement on Rocky Bayou, Miss. Provide for enlargement of Bayou Latenache from Pointe Coupee drainage structure to Alabama Bayou, La. 42-21 1st sess. H. Doc. 76, 85th Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 86-645. Public Law 87-874. Public Law 87-874. Public Law 87-874. Public Law 89-42. H. Doc. 308, 88th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 308, 88th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 308, 88th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 308, 88th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 308, 88th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 308, 88th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 308, 88th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 57, 89th Cong., 1st sess. Unpublished Vicksburg District's MRC report Approved- Apr. 14, 1966. H. Doc. 524, 89th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 89-789. Public Law 89-789. Public Law 90-147. H. Doc. 168, 90th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 339, 90th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 90-483. Unpublished MRC report dated May 8, 1968. Unpublished MRC report dated Feb. 2, 1970. Unpublished MRC report dated Mar. 6, 1970. Unpublished MRC report dated Sep. 22, 1969. MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-D AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Actor Authorization Work Authorized Document Dec. 31, 1970 Senate and House Public Works Resolutions adopted Dec. 17 and 15, 1970, respectively.4 River Basin Monetary Act of Dec. 23, 1971 Jan. 19, 19732 TITLE I Water Resources Development Act of 1974 Modify and expand project to include flood protection within the area of eastern Rapides and south-central Avoyelles Parishes, La., that are drained by Bayou des Glaises diversion channel and Lake Long, and their tributaries. Modify the project for West Kentucky tributaries (Obion Creek), Ky., to provide for all relocations, at Federal expense, of all transmission lines required by the project. Report on Western Tennessee Tributaries, Tenn. and Ky., authorized: a. Modification of Reelfoot Lake feature to provide channel improvements on Bayou du Chien and Lake No. 9 in Ky. and Tenn. b. Modification of Mississippi levee feature to include a pumping station near Mud Lake floodgate and adjacent channel improvements. Modification of Big Sunflower Basin feature to provide additional improvements in Steele Bayou Basin, Miss. . Continue prosecution of project for the comprehensive development of the basin, $97 million Modification of Tiptonville-Obion River levee feature to relieve local interests of all responsibility except that of providing maintenance. Modification of the Mississippi levee feature to provide additional drainage facilities in Long Lake area, vicinity of Helena, Ark. Projects recommended by four completed reports were authorized for accomplishment of Phase I design memorandum of advance engineering and design on: a. Greenville Harbor, Greenville, Miss. b. East bank of Mississippi River, Warren to Wilkinson Counties, Miss. (Natchez area). c. East bank of Mississippi River, Warren to Wilkinson Counties, Miss. (Vicksburg-Yazoo area). d. Bushley Bayou Area of Red River Backwater Area, La. Modification of West Tennessee tributaries feature (Obion and Forked Deer Rivers), Tenn., to acquire lands for fish and wildlife, recreation, and environmental purposes. Modification of the Yazoo Basin, Miss., feature to provide for a streambank erosion control demonstration project for the delta and hill areas of basin. Modification of project to provide that the Secretary of the Army, acting through the Chief of Engineers, can substitute authorized mitigation lands, not yet acquired and no longer suitable, for like acreage in the same or adjacent subbasins of the project area. This section provides the authority to substitute authorized mitigation lands in: a. Tensas Basin, La. and Ark., feature (Red River backwater). b. St. Francis Basin, Ark. and Mo., feature. Modification of Bayou Cocodrie and tributaries, La., feature, to provide for: enlargement of Bayou Courtableau from Washington to west protection levee; right-of-way and spoil disposal areas at Federal expense; and necessary additional culverts through west protection levee. S. Doc. 91-113, 2d sess. Public Law 91-611. H. Doc. 91-414, 2d sess. S. Doc. 91-74, 2d sess. Sec. 1, Public Law 92-222. Sec. 7, Public Law 92-222. Unpublished Memphis District's MRC report dated Oct. 4, 1972. Sec. 1, Public Law 93- 251. Mar. 7, 1974. S. Doc. 93-38, 1st sess. H. Doc. 93-148, 1st sess. H. Doc. 93-149, 1st sess. H. Doc. 93-157, 1st sess. Sec. 3, Public Law 93-251. Sec. 32, Public Law 93-251. Sec. 42, Public Law 93-251. Sec. 87, Public Law 93-251. 42-22 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 42-D AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Actor Authorization Work Authorized Document TITLE II River Basin Monetary Authorization Act of 1974 River Basin Monetary Act of Oct. 2, 1975 Dec. 16, 19752 TITTLE II Public Works for Water and Power Development and Energy Research Appropriation Act 1976. TITLE II Public Works for Water and Power Development and Energy Research Appropriation Act, 1977. Water Resources Development Act of 1976. TITLE II Public Works for Water and Power Development and Energy Research Appropriation Act, 1978. Dec. 9, 1977, 5th Ind. on VXD May 31, 1977, Letter Report.2 Modification of Cache River Basin, Ark., feature to provide for: acquisition by fee easements of lands for fish and wildlife management, recreation, and environmental purposes. Continue prosecution of project for the comprehensive development of the basin, $211 million. Continue prosecution of project for the comprehensive development of the basin, $158,000,000. Modification of St. Francis Basin, Ark. and Mo. feature to provide relief from ponding of interior runoff in the Inter-River Drainage District of Missouri. Continue prosecution of project for comprehensive development during period Jul. 1 - Sep. 30, 1976, $60,300,000. Continue prosecution of project for flood control, rescue work, repair, restoration, and control of bank erosion, $231,497,000. Sec. 101(a) authorized accomplishment of Phase I - Advanced Engineering and Design Memoranda - On: a. St. Johns Bayou and New Madrid Floodway, Mo., project: Report of OCE - Sep. 26, 1975. b. Nonconnah Creek, Tenn. and Miss., project: Reportof OCE - Jun. 23, 1976, and as an independent part of the project: Improvements for flood control and allied purposes on Horn Lake Creek and tributaries, including Cowpen Creek, Tenn. and Miss. Modification of West Tennessee Tributaries feature (Obion and Forked Deer Rivers), Tenn., to: a. (Sec. 102) - Provide project for flood control for Harris Fork Creek, Tenn. and Ky.: (H.D. 94-221) except that highway bridge relocations and alterations shall be at Federal expense. b. (Sec. 183) - Provide for construction of a levee and appurtenant works from mouth of Obion diversion channel to vicinity Highway 88 and thence to vicinity of Porter Gap, Tenn. Continue prosecution of project for flood control, rescue work, repair, restoration, and control of bank erosion, $253,081,000. Modification of the Tensas Basin Project, Red River Backwater Area, to include a drainage structure and appurtenant channel works in the Six Mile Bayou area of Concordia Parish, La. Sec. 99, Public Law 93-251. Sec. 201, Public Law 93- 251. Mar. 7, 1974. Sec. 1, Public Law 94-101. Unpublished Memphis District's MRC report dated Nov. 11, 1975. Public Law 94-180, Dec. 26, 1975. Public Law 94-355, Jul. 12, 1976. Public Law 94-587, Oct. 22, 1976. Public Law 95-96 Aug. 7, 1977. Unpublished Vicksburg District report dated May 31, 1977, on Cynthia and Six Mile Bayous, La. 42-23 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 42-D AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Actor Authorization Work Authorized Document Jun. 28, 1980 The establishment of the Tensas River National Wildlife Refuge for Public Law 96-285, the preservation and development of environmental resources Jun. 28, 1980. and in lieu of mitigation acquisitions which otherwise would be required for certain water resources projects, within designated limits, in the basins of the Tensas, Boeuf, and Red Rivers in the State of Louisiana. Energy and Water For expenses necessary for prosecuting work of flood control Public Law 96-367, Development Appro- projects, rescue work, repair, restoration or maintenance of Oct. 1, 1980. priation Act, 1981 flood control projects threatened or destroyed-by flood, $232,519,000: Provided, That not less than $250,000 be available for control of bank erosion of streams in the Yazoo Basin, including the foothill area. Provided further, That funds for the Tensas Basin Red River Backwater Area, be used for flood control, etc. for Sicily Island and Below Red River including pumping stations. 1. Incorporated into Mississippi River and tributaries project as 3. Date minor modification was approved under discretionary shown in Table 42-E. authority of Chief of Engineers contained in May 15, 1928, Flood 2. Date minor modification for blocked drainage was approved Control Act, as amended. under delegated authority of the President, Mississippi River 4. Projects approved under the provisions of Sec. 201 of Flood Commission, and in accordance with Sec. 10(p) of the 1946 Flood Control Act of Oct. 27, 1965. Control Act (Public Law 79-526). TABLE 42-E INCORPORATING AND AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION For Last Public Full Report Act of Law Authorizing See Annual Incorporation No. Act Description Report for Jul. 24, 1946 79-526 Jun. 22, 1936 Tiptonville-Obion levee and drainage improve- 1941, p. 943 ments, Tenn. Jul. 24, 1946 79-526 Jun. 22, 1936 Bayou des Glaises diversion ditch, La. 1946, p. 1029 Jul. 24, 1946 79-256 Jun. 22, 1936 From North Little Rock, Ark., to Gillett, Ark., 1946, p. 1053 on north bank of Arkansas River (portion below Plum Bayou). Jul. 24, 1946 79-256 Aug. 18, 1941 White River levees, Augusta to Clarendon and 1946, p. 1083 De Valls Bluff, Ark. Jul. 24, 1946 79-526 Dec. 22, 1944 Boeuf and Tensas Rivers and Bayou 1945, p. 982 Macon, La. Jul. 24, 1946 79-526 Dec. 22, 1944 Big Sunflower River, etc. 1946, p. 1061 Jun. 30, 1948 80-858 Jul. 24, 1946 Devils Swamp barge channel at Baton 1948, p. 1059 Rouge, La. (Baton Rouge Harbor) May 17, 1950 81-516 Jun. 22, 1936 Jonesville, La. 1953, p. 773 May 17, 1950 81-516 Jul. 24, 1946 Lake Pontchartrain-Jefferson Parish, La. 1953, p. 737 42-24 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-F SUMMARY OF PRESENTLY ESTIMATED FEDERAL FIRST COST OF AUTHORIZED IMPROVEMENTS Estimated Cost' Project Title Fiscal Year 1981 Completed features2 $ 165,432,000 Mississippi River levees 1,506,000,000 Mud Lake Pumping Station, Tenn. 3,480,000 Sec. 6 levees, 1928 Flood Control Act 4,000,000 Channel improvement 4,941,000,000 Atchafalaya Basin, La. 2,370,000,000 Bayou Cocodrie and tributaries, La. 31,700,000 Old River, La. 383,000,000 Lower Red River- South Bank Red River levees, La. 47,200,000 Eastern Rapides and south-central Avoyelles Parishes, La. 49,200,000 Mississippi Delta Region, La. 26,400,000 Teche-Vermilion Basins, La. 34,900,000 Tensas Basin, Ark. and La. 590,000,000 Bushley Bayou, La. 37,400,000 Lower Arkansas River, Ark. 33,900,000 Grand Prairie-Bayou Meto, Ark. 130,900,000 Yazoo Basin, Miss. 1,471,000,000 Lower White River, Ark. 46,700,000 Cache Basin, Ark. 126,000,000 St. Francis Basin, Ark. and Mo. 354,000,000 L'Anguille Basin, Ark. 20,700,000 West Tennessee tributaries, Tenn. 93,700,000 Harris Fork Creek, Tenn. & Ky. 7,170,000 Reelfoot Lake-Lake No. 9, Tenn. & Ky. (10,050,000) Reelfoot Lake, Tenn. & Ky. (Completed) 440,000 Reelfoot Lake-Lake No. 9, Tenn. & Ky. 9,610,000 West Kentucky tributaries, Ky. 25,800,000 TOTAL $12,509,632,000 1. Inflation projected through the construction period, channel construction works; Atchafalaya River and Basin; Wax Lake 2. Includes Bonnet Carrd, Morganza, and New Madrid Outlet; Charenton Canal; Bayou des Glaises diversion channel, Boeuf Floodways; Memphis, Greenville, and Vicksburg Harbors; Lake Basin levees; Grant's Canal; De Valls Bluff, Jonesville, and Des Arc Pontchartrain; Wolf River; completed roads on main stem levees; protection works; Baton Rouge Harbor; and miscellaneous features. 42-25 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 42-G MISSISSIPPI RIVER MAIN STEM CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS Operations in 1,000 Cubic Yards Location Fiscal Year 1981 Mileage Above Head Channel District of Passes Construction Maintenance Total New Orleans Baton Rouge Harbor (Devils Swamp) 235 - 103.3 103.3 Main stem channel 234-320 - 935.0 935.0 Vicksburg Main stem channel 320-600 - 4,035.0 4,035.0 Vicksburg Harbor 437 - 60.5 60.5 Greenville Harbor 537 - 249.6 149.6 Memphis Main stem channel 600-954 - 29,515.3 29,515.3 Memphis Harbor 726 - 982.4 982.4 TOTAL 35,881.1 35,881.1 42-26 TABLE 42-H BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1981) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Reinforcement Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This Location of R sion Lap Mainte- FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear nance (Linear (Linear (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)' Feet) (Squares)' (Squares)' Feet) Feet) MISSISSIPPI RIVER Standard revetment: Lower Childress-Fort Jackson, La .... 22 R - - - - - - - 10,194 Buras, La .......................... 25 R - - - - - - - 17,283 Tropical Bend, La. .................. 30 R - - - - - - - 20,692 Port Sulphur, La. ............ ...... 39 R - - - - - - - 21,363 Point Michel, La. ................... 44 R - - - - - - - 6,247 Bohemia, La. ....................... 46 L 12,380 - 50,576 12,380 Diamond, La ....................... 49 R - - - - - - - 8,750 Gravolet, La. ....................... 51 L - - - - - - 17,435 Junior, La. ......................... 54 R - - - - - - 17,570 Harlem, La. ........................ 56 L - - - - - - -13,975 Myrtle Grove, La. ................... 59 R - - - - - - 15,925 Monsecour, La ..................... 61 L - - - - - - - 10,020 Alliance, La. ........................ 62 R - - - - - - - 7,150 Belair, La .......................... 65 L - - - - - 21,295 Jesuit Bend, La..................... 68 R - - - - - - - 17,545 Linwood, La. ....................... 71 L - - - - -9,125 Oak Point, La. ...................... 72 R - - - - - - - 7,040 Scarsdale, La. ...................... 75 L - - - - - - -5,940 English Turn, La. ................... 78 R - - - - - - - 6,910 Poydras, La. ........................ 82 L 670 100 3,529 - - - 23,506 Cutoff, La. .......................... 88 R - - - - - - -15,761 Third district reach, La. ............. 93 L - - - - - - -21,101 Algiers Point, La. ................... 95 R - - - - - - 7,728 Gouldsboro Bend, La. ............... 96 R - - - - - - - 4,960 Gretna Bend, La. ................... 97 R - - - - - - - 9,662 Greenville Bend, La. ................ 100 R - - - - - - -22,045 Carrollton Bend, La. ................ 104 L - - - - - - 15,015 Avondale Bend, La .................. 109 R - - - - - - 22,371 Kenner, La. ........................ 114 L 13,130 30 66,787 - - - 22,219 Luling, La ......................... 119 R - - - - - 6,246 - 27,528 Good Hope, La. ..................... 126 L - - - - - - - 14,980 Waterford, La ...................... 128 R 3,910 120 13,459 - - - - 12,295 Montz, La. ......................... 132 L 785 330 4,692 - - - - 17,502 Lucy, La ........................... 136 R - - - - - - - 17,826 Reserve, La ........................ 138 L - - - - - 20,947 Willow Bend, La.................... 144 R 4,380 90 16,086 - - - 7,618 Angelina, La. ....................... 145 L - - - - - - 19,000 Vacherio, La. ... ................... 148 R - - - - - - 13,295 Belmont, La. ....................... 152 L - - - - - 3,891 - 21,240 Rich Bend, La ........................... 157 R - - - - - - - 14,124 TABLE 42-H (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1981) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Reinforcement Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This Location of R sion Lap Mainte- FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear nance (Linear (Linear (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)1 Feet) (Squares)1 (Squares)' Feet) Feet) MISSISSIPPI RIVER-continued Standard revetment: Romeville,, La. ..................... 161 L St. Alice, La. ....................... 165 R Burnside, La ...................... 170 L Aben, La. ......................... 172 R St. Elmo. La ...................... 174 L Smoke Bend, La. ................... 177 R Marchand, La. ..................... 180 L Philadelphia Point, La. ............. 183 R New River Bend, La. ............... 185 L White Castle, La ................... 193 R St. Gabriel, La. ..................... 201 L Plaquemine Bend, La. .............. 209 R Manchac, La ....................... 215 L Missouri Bend, La. ................ 222 R Arlington, La ...................... 227 L Port Allen, La. ..................... 231 R Allendale, La. ...................... 238 R Springfield Bend, La. ............... 244 L Arbroth, La. ....................... 250 R Grand Bay, La. .................. 258 R Bayou Sara, La .................... 265 L Red Store, La ...................... 269 R Arrow Bend, La. ................... 272 L Boies Point, La. .................... 275 R Morganza, La ....................... 279 R Iowa Point, La. ..................... 282 L Brunette Point, La. ................. 285 R Greenwood Bend, La. ............... 289 L Hog Point, La. ..................... 296 R Carr Point, La. ..................... 304 R Above Old River, La. ............... 305 R Fort Adams, Miss................... 308 L Point Preeeze, La. .................. 313 R Coochie, La ........................ 317 R Palmetto, Miss. ..................... 322 L Subtotal New Orleans District, Mississippi River ........... Dil:es: No ne 4,475 3,185 1,100 -o -o - - 44,015 (8.34 Miles) 110 260 150 - - -o - 15,252 22,739 6,546 -o - - - 1,190 199,666 15,334 27,052 16,050 5,433 10,240 17,075 7,845 5,379 24,394 33,335 14,371 35,475 22,592 16,193 12,244 11,320 17,940 25,690 13,190 7,090 4,780 7,830 13,600 16,094 20,513 11,375 8,038 14,987 8,673 8,600 4,800 17,219 11,165 17,150 30,864 14,111 1,195 5,667 5,063 2,468 2,602 1,592 3,011 - 45,846 - 1,131,492 (214.30 Miles) Oo Tj 0 H 0 O y H O z -z c C0 I. OLD RIVER CONTROL Standard revetment: Inflow channel .................... 315 L - - - - - - - 2,415 Inflow channel ..................... 315 R - - - - - - - 4,365 Outflow channel .................... 315 R 6,875 140 17,530 - - - - 17,754 Total standard revetment, Old River ....................... 6,875 140 17,530 - - - - 24,534 (1.30 Miles) (4.65 Miles) Dikes: None Below Confluence ATACHAFALAYA RIVER of Red and Atachafalaya Rivers Standard revetment: Mile One, La. ....................... 1 L - - - - - -4,150 Coville Bayou, La. ................... 3 R - - - - - - 6,550 Legonier, La ....................... 4 L - - - - - -8,940 Simmesport, La ..................... 6 R - - - - - - - 10,636 Kuhlman Bayou, La................. 7 L - - - - - - 5,565 Odenburg, La. ...................... 9 R - - - - - - - 5,375 Cason, La., ......................... 12 R - - - - - - - 10,798 McCrea, La. ........................ 13 L - - - - . 5,027 Woodside, La. ...................... 14 R - - - - - - 13,002 t Provosty, La. ....................... 17 L - - - - - 8,938 - 7,768 Crooked Bayou, La.................. 18 R - - - - - - 9,600 Mercier, La ....................... 22 L - - - - - - 10,478 Barberton, La ...................... 23 R - - - - - - 3,592 Evans Point, La. .................... 24 L - - - - - - - 4,961 Goudeau, La. ....................... 26 R - - - - - 3,938 Morris Bayou, La.................. 27 L - - - - - - 3,800 Goodwood, La ...................... 28 R - - - - - - - 8,505 Red Cross, La. ....................... 29 L - - - - - - 8,065 Melville, La. ....................... 30 R - - - - - - 4,870 Cross Bayou, La. .................... 31 L - - - - - - 3,815 Melville South, La. ................. 33 R - - - - - - 4,070 Toles, La. ......................... 35 L - - - - - - - 6,355 Petite Prairie, La................... 36 R - - - - - - - 8,381 Holloway Lake, La. ................. 37 L - - - - - - 7,085 Bayou Sherman, La. ................ 38 L - - - - - 5,200 Krotz Springs, La .................. 40 R - - - - - 4,625 Sherburne, La. .................... 43 R - - - - - - 7,035 Bayou Big Graw, La. ............... 46 R - - - - - - 8,394 Morgan City, La. ................... 115 L - - - - - - 3,410 Total standard revetment ......... - - - - 8,938 - 193,990 (36.74 Miles) Dikes: None TABLE 42-H BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (Continued) (FISCAL YEAR 1981) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Reinforcement Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This Location of R sion Lap Mainte- FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear nance (Linear (Linear (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)' Feet) (Squares)' (Squares)' Feet) Feet) Below Confluence of Old and Mississippi Standard revetment: Rivers Long Lake, La. ..................... 10 R Naples, La. ......................... 7 R Turnbull Island, La. ................ 9 L Total standard revetment Dikes: None RED RIVER2 Standard revetment:3 Dupre, La. ......................... 69 R Bringol, La. ........................ 73 R Egg Bend, La ...................... 75 R Cologne Bend, La. ................... 77 R Roxana, La. ........................ 83 R Ryland, La. ........................ 88 R Whittington, La. .................... 89 R Smith, La. ......................... 91 R Latanier, La. ....................... 93 R Hudson, La. ........................ 99 R Robert, La ......................... 102 R Alexandria Front, La. ............... 105 R Callahan, La. ....................... 110 R Cotton, La. ......................... 116 R Rapides, La ........................ 119 R Boyce, La .......................... 125 R Total standard revetment, Red River ................ Dikes:3 Choctaw Bayou Bend, La. .......... 71 R Bringol (Egg Bend), La. .......... 73 R Egg Bend, La. ................. 75 R Cologne Bend, La. .............. 77 R Echo, La. ' ...................... 78 R Richardson, La. ................ 79 R Alexandria, La................. 105 R Bertrand, La. .................. 122 R Total dikes, Red River .......... 1. Gross squares articulated concrete mattress (100 square feet). - - - - - - - 6,652 - - - - - - - 6,190 - - - - - - - 6,815 - - - - - - - 19,657 (3.72 Miles) - - - - - - - 2,690 - - - - - - - 4,000 - - - - - - - 2,400 - - - - - - - 650 - - - - - - - 3,325 - - - - - - - 3,925 - - - - - - - 2,900 - - - - - - - 2,700 - - - - - - - 2,460 - - - - - - - 1,458 - - - - - - - 5,500 - - - - - - - 5,280 - - - - - - - 4,000 - - - - - - - 14,700 - - - - - - - 1,030 - - - - - - - 4,548 - - - - - - - 61,566 (11.66 Miles) - - - - - - - 2,000 - - - - - - - 2,477 - - - - - - - 900 - - - - - - - 1,850 - - - - - - - 1,900 - - - - - - - 2,700 - - - - - - (Rock groin) 270 - - - - - - - 7,630 . 19,727 (3.74 Miles) 2. Mileages based on 1967 hydrographic survey. 3. Includes all types of dikes and retards. LOWER RED RIVER 1t 0 0 y0 cj y C 0 O z z o c , TABLE 42-I BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: VICKSBURG DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1981) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Reinforcement Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This Location of R sion Lap Mainte- FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear nance (Linear (Linear (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)' Feet) (Squares)' (Squares)' Feet) Feet) MISSISSIPPI RIVER Standard revetment: Bougere Bend, La. ................ 329 R - - - - - - - 20,805 Dead Mans Bend, Miss .............. 335 L - - - - - - - 10,380 St. Catherine Bend, La ............ 350 R 4,075 125 14,237 - - - - 12,885 Morville, La......................... 356 R - - - - - - - 11,815 Natchez Island, Miss .............. 357 R - - - - - - - 2,180 Carthage, Miss ................... 361 L 1,060 90 3,154 - - - - 14,585 Natchez Front, Miss .............. 364 L - - - - - - - 6,510 Gibson, La. .................... 371 R - - - 790 2,487 - - 22,735 Ashland, Miss.-La................ 374 L 3,785 180 10,256 - - - - 18,657 Kempe Bend, La................. 383 R - - - - - - - 26,655 Browns Field, La... ............. 389 R - - - - - - 9,280 Goldbottom, Miss. ................... 392 L - - - - - - - 30,250 Hardscrabble, La ................. 398 R - - - - - - 22,530 Grand Gulf, Miss. ............... 403 L - - - - - - 47,196 Point Pleasant, La.-Miss............. 413 R - - - - - - - 32,345 Togo Island, La. ................ 415 R -5,670 d Lake Karnac, La.-Miss............. 419 L - - - - - - - 19,260 Diamond Point, La.-Miss. ........... 423 R - - - - - - 12,125 Reid-Bedford, La ................. 429 R - - - - - - 18,392 Racetrack, Miss.....................433 L - - - - - - - 13,935 Barge Line Terminal, Miss. ......... 437 L - - - - - - - 3,040 Vicksburg Harbor, Miss............. 437 L - - - - - - 7,350 Delta Point, La ................... 437 R - - - - - 1,332 - 7,650 C/ King's Point-Opposite rn Delta Point, La.-Miss.............. 439 L - - - - - - 19,330 False Point, La. ................... 443 R - - - 490 1,788 - - 12,860 Marshall-Brown's Point, La.-Miss ... 446 L - - - - - 3,869 - 19,580 Milliken Bend, La. ................. 453 R - - - - - - 44,650 Belle Island, La.-Miss. .............. 460 L - - - - - - - 24,160 Goodrich, La ...................... 467 R - - - - - 1,958 - 37,220 Fitler-Cottonwood, Miss. ............ 474 L - - - - - - 28,427 Hagaman, La ...................... 481 R - - - - - - 37,756 Ben Lomond, Miss. ................. 486 L - - - - - - 10,235 Baleshed Towhead-Stack Island, La.-Miss ......................... 488 R - - - - - - 52,1242 Lake Providence, La. ............... 489 R - - - - - - 11,600 Mayersville, Miss. .................. 497 L - - - - 1,270 - 34,992 TABLE 42-I (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: VICKSBURG DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1981) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Reinforcement Since Thru ocationHead Bank Exten- Prior This of R sion Lap Mainte- FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear nance (Linear (Linear (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)' Feet) (Squares)' (Squares)' Feet) Feet) MISSISSIPPI RIVER-continued Sarah Island-Opossum Point, La.-Miss ........................ 503 R Carolina, Miss.................... 507 L Cracraft, Ark ..................... 511 R Worthington, Miss.-Ark............. 514 R Walnut Point Kentucky Bend, Miss ...................... 519 L American Cutoff, Miss.-Ark......... 526 L Sunnyside-Lakeport, Ark............ 530 R Vaucluse, Ark ..................... 534 R Island 84, Ark.-Miss................. 535 L Warfield Point, Miss............... 537 L LaGrange Towhead, Miss. ........... 538 L Spanish Moss, Ark................. 539 R Leland Cutoff, Ark................. 539 L Tarpley Island, Miss............... 542 R Miller Bend, Miss................. 544 L Island 82, Ark ..................... 546 R Ashbrook Island, Miss. ............... 549 R Arkansas City-Yellow Bend, Ark ... 553 R Huntington Point, Miss ............. 556 L Pair O'Dice, Ark.................. 561 R Eutaw-Mounds, Miss. ............... 563 L Cypress Bend, Ark. ................. 568 R Catfish Point, Miss.................. 573 L Ozark, Ark.-Miss. .................. 578 R Prentiss, Ark.-Miss. ................ 582 L Rosedale Bend, Ark. ................ 585 L Riverton, Miss .................... 586 L Klondike, Ark ..................... 588 R Victoria Bend-Terrene, Miss. ........ 593 L Big Island, Ark .................... 598 R Smith Point, Miss .................. 601 L Dennis, Miss ...................... 611 L Cessions, Miss ..................... 615 L Total revetment, Vicksburg District, Mississippi River ...... 530 763 2,785 11,705 (2.22 Miles) - - - - -_ - -_ (2.22 Miles) 395 - -� - - - - -95 7,673 35,320 - - - - - - - - 2,573 - -_ -_ -_ - -_ - -,57 2,007 2,223 - 1,869 - - 3,334 - - 1,895 - - 4,258 - - -_ 8,505 19,785 1f 0 O y z z C2 t o 00 16,970 11,080 22,210 8,350 45,653 2,980 33,685 4,300 13,475 4,320 9,130 4,580 1,300 2,000 29,360 3,080 3,455 40,560 10,045 9,095 40,188 26,585 20,075 22,015 20,315 4,820 12,500 23,400 29,245 16,515 18,185 21,265 10,910 1,250,810 (236.9 Miles) ---- Dikes: (3) Jackson Point, Miss ................. 330 L - - - - - - - 4,251 Natchez Island, La.-Miss............. 358 R - - - - - - - 7,975 Waterproof Bar, La................. 379 R - - - - - - - 11,372 Spithead Towhead, Miss............. 386 L - - - - - - - 3,561 Browns Field, La ................... 388 R - 4,205 - - - - - 4,8354 Cottage Bend, La.-Miss.............. 389 L - - - - - - - 14,765 Bondurant Towhead, La............. 394 R - - - - - - - 4,421 Coffee Point, La .................... 405 R - - - - - - - 3,260 Yucatan, Miss ...................... 410 R - - - - - - - 9,010 Togo Island, La..................... 416 L - - - - - - - 8,246 Below Racetrack, Miss .............. 430 L - - - - - - - 6,139 Racetrack Towhead, Miss............ 431 R - - - - - - - 1,752 Marshall Cutoff, La................. 448 R - - - - - - - 5,1664 Forest Home Towhead, La........... 449 L 3,570 - - - - - - 3,570 Willow Cutoff, La. ................. 462 R 2,365 - - - - - - 4,275 Point Lookout, La................... 478 R - - - - - - - 2,751 Ajax Bar, Miss ..................... 482 L 1,340 825 - - - - - 22,049 Ben Lomond, Miss .................. 488 L - - - - - - - 24,667 Balshed Ldg., Miss.................. 493 L - - - - - - - 8,238 Wilson Point, La.................... 500 R - - - - - - - 3,592 Corregidor, Miss.................... 505 L - - - - - - - 6,730 Carolina, Ark ...................... 509 L - - - - - 2,897 Cracraft Lower, Ark................ 510 R - - - - - - - 9,614 Cracraft, Ark ...................... 513 R - - - - - - - 3,809 Leota, Miss .. ...................... 514 L - - - - - - - 7,571 Island 86, Ark ...................... 520 R - - - - - - - 6,592 ' Seven Oaks, Ark.................... 523 R - - - - - - - 5,754 Walnut Point, Miss ................. 525 L - - - - - - - 4,725 Refuge, Miss ....................... 528 L - - - - - - - 5,240 Island 84, Ark ...................... 532 L - - - - - - - 4,580 Leland Bar, Ark.-Miss .............. 538 R - - - - - - - 14,428 Leland Neck, Ark. & Miss........... 540 L - - - - - - - 4,315 ( Tarpley Cutoff, Miss.-Ark............ 540 R - - - - - - -5,100 Island 82-Miller Bend, Ark.-Miss ........................ 544 R&L - - - - - - -13,646 Ashbrook-Miller Bend, t Ark.-Miss....................... 547 L&R - - - - - - - 10,799 Ashbrook Cutoff, Miss............... 549 L - - - - - - - 8,728 Chicot Ldg., Ark................... 564 R - - - - - - - 17,451 Catfish Point, Miss.................. 571 L - - - - - - 5,290 Below Prentiss, Miss................. 580 R 3,565 - - - - - - 7,805 Malone Field, Ark.................. 585 R - - - - - - - 7,549 Terrene, Miss ...................... 590 L - - - - - - 7,921 White River Landing, Ark........... 591 R - - - - - - 2,201 Montgomery Towhead, Ark.......... 592 R - - - - - - 6,071 Victoria Bend, Ark ................. 596 R - - - - - 5,0334 Smith Point, Miss ................... 600 L - - - - - - - 7,602 Island 70, Miss ..................... 608 L - - - - - - - 14,949 Total dikes. Vicksburg District, Mississippi River ...... 10,840 5,030 - - - - - 350,295 (2.05 Miles) (66.34 Miles) TABLE 42-I BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: VICKSBURG DISTRICT (Continued) (FISCAL YEAR 1981) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Reinforcement Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This of R sion Lap Mainte- FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear nance (Linear (Linear (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)' Feet) (Squares)' (Squares)' Feet) Feet) Miles Above Month ARKANSAS RIVERS Standard Revetment: Menard Bend, Ark ................ 31 L Como, Ark ....................... 34 R Morgan Bend, Ark. ................ 36 L Yancopin, Ark .................... 24 R Total standard revetment, Arkansas River ............... Dikes: Hopedale Cutoff, Ark. ............. 30 R Morgan Bend, Ark ................. 36 L Fletcher Bend, Ark. ................ 39 R Total dikes, Arkansas River ....... 1. Gross squares articulated concrete mattress (100 square feet). 2. Contains 7,814 linear feet of trenchfill revetment (stone). 3. Linear feet of dike on which repairs were made. - 11,770 - 11,720 - 5,250 - 2,800 - 31,540 (5.97 Miles) - 1,848 - 3,658 - 2,187 - 7,693 (1.46 Miles) 4. Changed to correct previous errors. 5. See report on Arkansas River and tributaries, Ark. and Okla., under Little Rock District. Location 0 Cd y O 0 zz C oo TABLE 42-J BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: MEMPHIS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1981) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Reinforcement Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This Location of R sion Lap Mainte- FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear nance (Linear (Linear (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)1 Feet) (Squares)' (Squares)' Feet) Feet) MISSISSIPPI RIVER Standard revetment: Big Island, Ark ................... 598 R - - - - - - - 3,905 Scrubgrass Bend, Ark. ............ 600 R - - - - - - - 7,315 Henrico, Ark. ................... 606 R - - - - - - 25,040 Cessions Towhead, Ark ............. 615 L - - - - - - 10,615 Knowlton, Ark .................... 620 R - - - - - - - 16,900 Island 67, Miss. .................... 621 L - - - - - - - 7,625 Island 68 Bar, Ark. ............... 622 R - - - - - - - 6,445 Ludlow, Ark ..................... 626 R - - - - - - - 10,390 Rescue Landing, Ark.-Miss.......... 629 L - - - - - - - 27,020 Fair Landing, Ark ................ 632 R 23,890 Burke Landing, Miss .............. 637 L - - - - - - - 19,070 Island 62, Ark. .................... 638 R - - - - - - - 9,030 Island 63, Miss .... ............... 639 L - - - - - - - 11,454 Island 63 Bar, Miss.... .......... 639 L - - - - - - - 3,795 Oldtown Bend, Ark . .............. 644 R - - - - - - - 25,995 Cn Horeshoe, Miss ................... 647 L - - - - - - - 16,385 Westover, Ark .................... 650 R - - - - - - - 12,730 Delta-Friars Point, Miss............. 655 L - - - - - - - 30,090 Helena, Ark ..................... 660 R - - - - - - - 36,460 Trotters Landing, Miss....... 665 L - - - - - - - 32,905 Flower Lake, Miss............... 667 L - - - 270 726 4,968 - 16,385 St. Francis, Ark ................... 672 R - - - - - - - 24,663 Harbert Point, Miss ................ 675 L - - - - - 7,838 - 9,065 Walnut Bend, Ark ................. 680 R - - - - - 5,762 - 27,220 Mhoon Bend, Miss ................. 685 L - - - - - 1,978 - 35,828 O Peters, Ark ...................... 692 R - - - - - 3,242 - 23,675 Commerce, Miss. ................ 695 L - - - - - - - 11,615 Porter Lake, Ark......... ........ 700 R 34,155 Pickett, Miss.-Ark ................. 703 R - - - - - - - 12,575 Norfolk-Star, Miss. ................ 709 L - - - - - - - 35,582 Cow Island Bend, Ark. ............. 714 R - - - - - - - 22,274 Cow Island Bend (Upper), Tenn. . ................... 716 R - - - - - - - 6,853 Coahoma, Tenn ................... 717 L - - - - - - 9,270 Ensley, Tenn ..................... 723 L - - - - - - - 36,566 Dismal Point, Ark. ................ 724 R - - - - - - - 7,200 Bauxippi-Wyanoke, Ark. ........... 730 R - - - - - - - 23,300 Presidents Island, Tenn. ............. 733 L 12,755 Hopefield Point, Ark.-Tenn.......... 736 R - - - - 5,390 Loosahatchie-Memphis, Tenn........ 737 L - - - - 31,293 Loosahatchie Bar, Tenn. ............. 740 R - - - - -2,070 St. Clair, Ark ................... 742 R . - - - - - - 2,90 Island 40, Tenn.-Ark ............... 744 R - - - - - - 30,750 TABLE 42-J BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: MEMPHIS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1981) Operations This FY Nonop-erative tive Construction erative Above New Work Reinforcement Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This Location of R sion Lap Mainte- FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear nance (Linear (Linear (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)' Feet) (Squares)' (Squares)' Feet) Feet) MISSISSIPPI RIVER-continued Standard revetment: Brandywine, Ark.-Tenn. ............ 750 R - - -. - - - - 18,010 Shelby Forest, Tenn................. 753 L - - - - -9,550 Dean Island, Ark................... 756 R - - - - -7,555 Cedar Point-Densford, Tenn......... 759 L - - - - - 20,190 Chute of Island 35, Tenn............. 764 R - - - - - 29,190 Lookout Bar, Tenn.................. 772 R - - - -2,9902 Lookout, Tenn...................... 774 R - - - - - -,005 Sunrise Towhead, Tenn.............. 776 R - - - - - 14,615 Lower Bullerton, Ark. .............. 782 R 1,030 200 2,495 - - 5,385 - 28,350 Kate Aubrey Towhead-Island 30, Tenn . .......................... 786 R - - - - - 28,658 Osceola, Ark ....................... 786 R - - - - - - - 1,35 Osceola, Ark ....................... 786 R - - - - - - - 5,823 Ashport-Keyes Point, Tenn. ......... 791 L - - - - - 44,232 Kate Aubrey, Tenn ................. 793 R - - - -2,500 Island 26, Tenn.................... 798 R - - - - - - - 15,690 Bend of Island 25, Tenn. ............ 803 L - - - - - - - 22,730 Barfield, Ark ...................... 808 R - - - - - - - 44,040 Obion-Tamm, Tenn. ................ 819 L - - - - - 7,176 - 49,831 Huffman-Hickman, Ark.-Tenn. ..... 826 R - - - - - - - 26,984 Heloise, Tenn. ...................... 831 L - - - - - - - 12,935 Island 18, Mo. ...................... 836 R - - - - - - - 22,170 Linwood Bend, Tenn. ............... 841 L - - - - - - - 14,850 Blaker Towhead, Tenn. ............. 845 L - - - - - - - 17,087 Bells Point, Mo. .................... 845 R - - - - - - - 5,420 Gayoso-Caruthersville, Mo. .......... 848 R - - - - - - - 25,600 Island 15, Tenn. .................... 851 L - - - - - - - 3,630 Hathaway Landing, Tenn. .......... 852 L - - - - - - - 1,000 Robinson Bayou, Mo. ............... 852 R - - - - - - - 22,630 Fritz Landing, Tenn. ............... 857 L - - - - - - - 15,670 Lee Towhead, Mo. .................. 859 L - - - - - - - 8,470 Bend of Island 14, Tenn. ............ 859 L - - - - - - - 12,050 Above Lee Towhead, Tenn. .......... 861 L - - - - - - - 4,943 Little Cypress, Mo. ................. 864 R - - - - - - - 32,240 Merriwether-Cherokee, Tenn. ....... 869 L - - - - - - - 41,058 Linda, Mo ......................... 876 R - - - - - - - 11,950 Below Toney's Towhead, Tenn. ...... 879 L - - - - - - - 20,895 New Madrid Bend, Mo. .............. 886 R - - - - - - - 30,348 Kentucky Point, Ky. ................ 887 L - - - - - - - 7,960 New Madrid Bar, Ky. ............... 888 R - - - - - - - 15,375 New Madrid, Mo. .................. 889 R - - - - - - - 5,559 La Forge, Mo. ...................... 892 R - - - - - 2,377 - 20,680 Slough Landing Neck, Tenn.-Ky ........................ 899 L - - - - - - -32,940 M lII O0 0 O C) ttj 0 z z ri: C/2 d c 00 Winchester Towhad, Mo. .......... 900 R 5,540 Island 9, Ky.-Tenn . ........... 905 L 5,650 300 3,790 - - - - 35,585 Milton Bell, Mo. ............. 908 R - - - - - 2,322 - 14,375 Chute of Island 8, Ky .............. 913 L 12,620 Bend of Island 8, Mo. .............. 914 R - - - - - 9,800 Island 8, Ky. ...................... 914 R 13,260 Hickman-Reelfoot, Ky............. 919 L 41,909 Beckwith Bend, Mo ............... 924 R 14,588 Williams, Ky .................... 927 L 10,015 Wolf Island, Ky .................. 934 R 1,620 220 3,272 19,205 Columbus, Ky ................... 937 L 3,825 Belmont, Mo .................... 938 R 5,785 Island 3 and 4, Ky ................ 940 R - - - - - 4,424 - 19,970 Campbell, Ky. .................... 943 L 6,865 Pritchard,.Mo. ................... 948 R 15,045 Mayfield Creek, Ky. ................ 949 L 5,935 Wickliffe, Ky .................... 953 L 8,455 Cache-Cairo, Ill. (Ohio River) ........ 958 R 26,152 Total revetment, Memphis District, 8,300 720 9,557 270 726 45,472 - 1,788,155 Mississippi River ............. (1.57 Miles) (338.7 Miles) Dikes: (4) (s) Henrico, Ark ...................... 603 R - - - - - - 6,310 Below Knowlton, Ark ............. 616 R - - - - - 1,370 - 8,250 Island 67, Miss. ..................... 621 L - - - - - - - 4,320 Below Ludlow, Ark. .............. 624 R - - - - - 2,020 - 5,040 Sunflower, Ark. ................... 627 L - - - - - - - 5,520 Island 64, Ark .. ................. 630 R - - - - - - - 7,330 t Island 62, Ark ................... 638 R - - - - - - - 23,180 Island 63 Bar, Miss ............... 639 L - - - - - 50 - 2,600 Island 63, Miss ................... 640 L - - - - - - - 5,640 Kangaroo Point, Ark .............. 649 R - - - - - - - 5,730 Friars Point, Miss ................ 652 L - - - - - - - 6,870 Montezuma Bar, Miss............. 657 L - - - - - 230 - 12,430 O Montezuma Towhead, Ark. ........... 656 R - - - - - - - 3,450 Prairie Point, Ark. ................ 668 R - - - - - - - 10,336 St. Francis Towhead, Miss........... 671 L - - - - - - - 3,380 Below Walnut Bend, Ark. ............ 676 R - - - - - - 6,420 Bordeaux Point, Miss ............. 681 L - - - - - - 4,920 Commerce, Miss. .................. 694 L - - - - - - - 5,700 Basket Bar, Ark .................. 696 R - - - - - 225 - 5,060 Buck Island, Miss. ................. 700 L - - - - - - - 4,890 Porter Lake, Ark. ................. 701 R - - - - - 50 - 7,930 Pickett, Miss .................... 704 L - - - - - - - 7,180 Seyppel, Ark .................... 706 R - - - - - 2,360 - 11,640 Cat Island, Ark. .................... 710 R - - - - - - - 15,590 Coahoma, Tenn .................. 718 L - - - - - - 4,640 Armstrong, Ark.-Tenn ............. 720 R - - - - - - - 18,690 Dismal Point, Ark ................ 724 R - - - - - 150 - 22,170 Hopefield Point, Ark ............... 736 R - - - - - - 1,330 Robinson Crusoe, Tenn. ............. 738 R - - - - - - - 21,670 Loosahatchie Bar, Tenn. ............. 739 R - - - - - 200 - 3,950 Above Loosahatchie, Tenn. .......... 742 L - - - - - - 8,990 Redman Point, Ark. ................ 743 R - - - - - - - 7,750 Randolph Point, Tenn. .............. 747 L - - - - - - - 16,740 Poker Point, Ark. .................. 748 R - - - - - - - 8,050 Corona Bar, Tenn.-Ark. ............. 755 R - - - - - 425 - 8,430 Densford, Tenn. ................... 757 L - - - - - 170 - 7,780 Cedar Point, Tenn................ 759 L - - - - - 75 - 2,890 TABLE 42-J (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: MEMPHIS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1981) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Reinforcement Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This Location of R sion Lap Mainte- FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear nance (Linear (Linear (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)' Feet) (Squares)' (Squares)' Feet) Feet) MISSISSIPPI RIVER-continued Dikes: Below Richardson Landing, Tenn. ........................... 767 L - - - - - - - 5,950 Lookout, Tenn.-Ark. ................ 771 R - - - - - - - 5,538 Plum Point, Tenn. .................. 784 L - - - - - - - 5,760 Kate Aubrey, Tenn.................. 791 R (2,040)6 - - - - 1,260 - 9,220 Keyes Point, Tenn.................. 791 L - - - - - 10,620 Ashport-Goldust, Tenn.-Ark.......... 795 R - - - - - 17,330 Forked Deer, Tenn. ................ 798 L - - - - - 200 - 8,550 Island 25, Ark . ................... 804 R - - - - - - - 5,450 Nebraska Point, Tenn. .............. 808 L - - - - - - - 11,050 Below Tamm Bend, Tenn............ 813 L - - - - - - - 8,300 Wrights Point, Ark.................. 820 R - - - - -27,990 Island 21, Chute, Tenn............... 824 L - - - - -3,170 Head of Island 21, Tenn. ............ 828 L - - - - - 500 - 5,460 Island 20, Mo.-Tenn................ 831 R - - - - - 150 - 18,139 Island 18, Tenn. .................... 837 L - - - - -5,395 Tennemo, Tenn...................... 842 L - - - - - 200 - 2,505 Caruthersville-Linwood Bend, Mo ....................... 844 R - - - - - 100 - 25,877 Sandy Hook, Tenn................... 850 R - - - - -2,350 Island 15, Tenn. .................... 851 L - - - - -7,016 Robinson Bayou, Mo................. 853 R 2,850 - - - - 9,890 Hathaway, Tenn..................... 854 L - - - - -13,670 Island 15 Neck, Tenn. ............. 854 L - - - - - 21,100 Above Lee Towhead, Tenn........... 859 L - - - - - - - 1,300 Below Cherokee, Tenn. ............. 866 L - - - - - - - 6,230 Stewart Towhead, Mo. .............. 871 R - - - - - - - 18,290 Ruddles Point, Mo. ................. 874 R - - - - - - - 8,130 Kentucky Point, Ky................ 887 L - - - - - - 11,550 Morrison Towhead, Mo. ............. 890 R - - - - -1,070 Donaldson Point, Mo. .............. 905 R - - - - - - - 8,320 Island 9, Ky ...................... 906 L - - - - 7,010 Campbell, Ky ..................... 942 L - - - - -2,610 Pritchard, Mo ..................... 944 R - - - - - 400 -9,390 Island 1, Ky ....................... 948 L - - - - - - - 15,260 Total dikes, Memphis District, Mississippi River ............. 810 - - - - 10,135 -632,286 (.1 Mile) (119.7 Miles) 1. Gross squares-articulated concrete mattress(100 square feet). 5. Linear feet of dike on which repairs were made. 2. Lumber mattress revetment 6. Linear feet of stone dike that was razed. 3. Rock groins. 7. Linear feet of triangular frame retards and pile dikes. 4. Stone in pile dike. LTI 0 H0 H O C, Ij o > Li d ci 00 00 TABLE 42-K PROJECT LEVEES: NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1981) Levees and Floodwalls Berms (Miles) Surfaced Roads on Levees (Miles) (Miles) Built to Approved Total Total Grade and Section In In Com- Location In Total System Com- System plete Authorized Place Thru When Built plete When Built Thru for This This This Com- This This Com- This This System .FY FY FY pleted' FY FY pleted FY FY MISSISSIPPI RIVER Fifth Louisiana Levee District ............ (16.8) (16.8) Levees ............................ 15.5 15.5 Floodwalls .................. ....... - - Old River structures and levees ......... 1.3 1.3 Atchafalaya Basin Levee District ......... (126.3) (126.3) Levees ............................ 118.7 118.7 Floodwalls ......................... - - Morganza structure and levee ........... 0.8 0.8 Morganza forebay levee ............... 6.7 6.7 Port Allen lock ..................... 0.1 0.1 Lafourche Basin Levee District ........... (81.7) (81.7) Levees ............................ 81.5 81.5 Floodwalls ......................... 0.1 0.1 Harvey Canal lock ................... 0.1 0.1 Plaquemines West Levee District ......... (37.9) (37.9) Levees ............................ 37.9 37.9 Floodwalls ......................... - Buras Levee District .................... (34.1) (34.1) Levees ............................ 34.0 34.0 Floodwalls ........................ Empire lock ........................ 0.1 0.1 Baton Rouge front levees ................ (2.1) (2.1) Pontchartrain Levee District ............ (124.9) (124.9) Levees ............................ 110.8 110.8 Floodwalls ................... ...... - Bonnet Carre' guide levees ............. 11.3 11.3 Bonnet Carre' forebay levee ............ 1.3 1.3 Bonnet Carre' structure ......... ...... 1.5 1.5 East Jefferson Levee District ................ (11.6) (11.6) Levees .................................... 11.6 11.6 Floodwalls .............................. - - Orleans Levee District ..................... (27.2) (27.2) (-) (7.3) - 6.02 - 1.3 (18.7) (76.1) 18.7 68.5 - 0.8 - 6.7 - 0.1 (-) (28.6) - 28.4 - 0.1 - 0.1 (3.9) (32.0) 3.9 32.0 (-) (34.1) - 34.1 (-) (0.9) (-) (81.9) - 67.8 - 11.3 - 1.3 - 1.5 (-) (8.8) - 8.8 (2.7) (16.4) (-) (-) (-) (15.5) - - - 15.5 (5.3) (1.0) (1.0) (118.7) 5.3 1.0 1.0 118.7 (0.1) (-) (0.1) (81.6) 0.1 - 0.1 81.5 - - - 0.1 (-) (-) (-) (37.9) - - - 37.9 (-) (-) (-) (34.0) - - - 34.0 (-) (4.7) 4.7 (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (2.1) (110.8) 110.8 (11.6) 11.6 (18.4) (-) (15.5) - 15.5 (-) (118.7) - 118.7 (-) (81.6) - 81.5 - 0.1 (-) (37.9) - 37.9 (-) (34.0) - 34.0 F/2 tR H C12 Cz2 C M 1 C" O (-) (-) (-) (-) (2.1) (110.8) 110.8 (11.6) 11.6 (18.4) IP1 PROJECT LEVEES: NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1981) Levees and Floodwalls Berms (Miles) Surfaced Roads on Levees (Miles) (Miles) Built to Approved Total Total Grade and Section In In Com- Location In Total System Corn- System plete Authorized Place Thru When Built plete When Built Thru for This This This Corn- This This Com- This This System FY FY FY pleted' FY FY pleted FY FY MISSISSIPPI RIVER-continued Left descending, east bank Levees ............................. 4.6 4.6 Floodwalls ......................... 8.6 8.6 IHNC lock ......................... 0.1 0.1 Right descending, west bank Levees ............................ 13.8 13.8 Floodwalls ......................... Algiers Canal lock ................... 0.1 0.1 Lake Borgne Basin Levee District ......... (11. ) (11.6) Levees ............................ 11.6 11.6 Floodwalls ......................... - - Grand Prairie Levee District ............. (37.4) (37.4) Levees ............................ 37.4 37.4 Floodwalls ......................... - - Total Mississippi River ............. 511.6 511.6 LOWER RED RIVER-SOUTH BANK RED RIVER Lower Red River-South Bank Red River levees ...................... (59.2) (59.2) Hotwells to Moncla, La., levees ........... 59.2 59.2 Floodwalls ......................... - - Total Lower Red River ............. 59.2 59.2 ATCHAFALAYA BASIN FLOODWAY Atchafalaya River and Bayou des Glaises ..................... (148.4) (148.4) East bank Atchafalaya River ........... 52.5 52.5 Bayou des Glaises .................... 7.9 7.9 West bank Atchafalaya River ........... 60.1 60.1 Simmesport Ring 1.6 1.6 Melville Ring ....................... 4.1 4.1 2.3 2.3 0.1 2.7 11.6 - 0.1 (-) (10.8) - 10.8 (7.0) (23.7) 7.0 23.7 (-) (-) (-) - (-) (-) (-) - (-) (-) (-) - 4.6 13.8 (11.6) 11.6 (37.4) 37.4 4.6 - 13.8 (-) (11.6) - 11.6 (-) (37.4) - 37.4 32.3 320.6 10.1 1.0 1.1 479.6 - 479.6 (-) (49.2) (-) (-) (-) (59.2) (8.8) (42.8) - 49.23 - - - 59.2 8.8 42.8 - 49.2 - - - 59.2 8.8 42.8 (-) (143.9) - 52.5 - 7.9 - 55.6 - 1.6 - 4.1 (-) (-) (-) (148.4) - - - 52.5 - - - 7.9 - - - 60.1 - - - 1.6 - - - 4.1 (-) (43.9) - 20.2 - 12.0 TABLE 42-K (Continued) 0 M 0 0 C) LT O z z tTj t1 I. Cl l) d 00 Krotz Springs Ring ................... 1.7 1.7 Mansura Hills to Hamburg ............. 20.5 20.5 West protection levee, Hamburg to Berwick drainage canal via Calumet ......... (128.7) (128.7) Levees west of Berwick, Berwick drainage canal to Charenton drainage canal .... (56.5) (56.5) Morganza upper guide levee ............. (8.9) (8.9) East protection levee, Morganza to Cutoff Bayou, including 19.5 miles of Morganza lower guide levee ............. (106.7) (106.7) Total Atchafalaya Basin and Floodway ...................... 449.2 449.2 Total-Main Stem System ......... 1,020.0 1,020.0 LAKE PONTCHARTRAIN, LA. Lake Pontchartrain, La. .................. (17.4) (17.4) Item A levees ....................... 5.0 5.0 Item B levees ................ ....... 10.1 10.1 Item C levees ....................... 2.3 2.3 Total ......................... 17.4 17.4 1.7 20.5 1.7 20.5 11.7 (-) (50.7) (-) (-) (-) (127.7) (-) (50.7) (-) (-) (9.6) (-) (8.9) (-) (-) (-) (-) (56.5) (-) (-) (-) (8.9) (-) (8.9) (6.6) (23.0) (-) (-) (-) (105.0) (6.6) (23.0) 6.6 236.1 - - - 446.5 6.6 126.5 38.9 605.9 10.1 1.0 1.1 985.3 15.4 648.9 (-) (17.4) - 5.0 - 10.1 - 2.3 - 17.4 (-) (-) (-) (17.4) - - - 5.0 - - - 10.1 - - - 2.3 - - - 17.4 (-) (17.4) - 5.0 - 10.1 - 2.3 - 17.4 1. Figures indicate landside seepage berms only. 2. Design criteria changed and levees are now below grade. 3. Reflects results of flowline reanalysis. M--41 C2 C2 F- --1 F-4 C lM 1--- -- 1 0 z3 TABLE 42-L PROJECT LEVEES: VICKSBURG DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1981) Levees and Floodwalls Berms (Miles)' Surfaced Roads on Levees (Miles) (Miles) Built to Approved Total Total Grade and Section In In Corn- Location In Total System Corn- System plete Authorized Place Thru When Built plete When Built Thru for This This This Corn- This This Comrn- This This System FY FY FY2 pleted " FY4 FY pleted FY FY MISSISSIPPI RIVER East bank in Mississippi ................. . 178.3 s 178.3 - 109.1 154.9 4.4 104.1 168.4 - 168.4 Greenville Harbor dikes .................. .. 7.8 7.8 - 7.8 - - - - - West bank in Arkansas ................. . 75.6 75.6 - 42.9 51.1 2.8 46.4 75.4 - 75.4 West bank in Louisiana (above Red River) ...................... 198.7 198.7 6.7 60.3 89.1 2.9 66.0 197.8 - 197.8 Total Mississippi River ................ 460.4 460.4 6.7 220.1 295.1 10.1 216.5 442.5 - 442.5 YAZOO RIVER BASIN Headwater ............................. 620.76 305.1 5.0 130.1 - - - 620.7 5.0 281.5 Backwater ............................ 96.6 44.6 - 0.0 - - - 96.6 - 39.0 Total Yazoo River Basin ............... . 717.3 349.7 5.0 130.1 - - - 717.3 5.0 320.5 ARKANSAS RIVER. ARKANSAS North bank .......................... 61.57 56.2 - 56.2 8.3 - 8.3 47.4 - 47.4 South bank .............. ............. 85.4 85.4 - 85.4 24.7 - 24.7 84.1 - 81.1 Total Arkansas River .................. 146.9 141.6 - 141.6 33.0 - 33.0 131.5 - 128.5 RED RIVER BACKWATER LEVEES Total Red River backwater ............. . 263.6 156.5 - 81.38 - - - 249.0 - 141.9 1. This tabulation does not include riverside berms which are considered an integral part of the levee section. Riverside berms will be constructed along with levee enlargements or seepage berm contracts. 2. Levee that has adequate freeboard based on the refined 1973 MR&T project flood flow line for the Mississippi River. Levees with more than 2 feet of freeboard are considered adequate. 3. Subject to change as planning progresses. Does not include existing berms which need restudy. 4. Based on refined 1973 MR&T project flood flow line. 5. Includes 1.4 miles of concrete floodwall and 0.3 mile of levee on Vicksburg city front. 6. Includes 33.1 miles of local protection works; 61.3 miles along Whittington Auxiliary Channel; 210 miles in Upper Yazoo Projects; 156.1 miles along main stem; and 160.2 miles on tributaries. 7. Includes 5.3 miles for Gillett new levee. 8. Revised to reflect 1973 project design flow line. 0 0 z 0 zo Ci y- 1 w TABLE 42-M PROJECT LEVEES: MEMPHIS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1981) Levees and Floodwalls Berms (Miles)' Surfaced Roads on Levees (Miles) (Miles) Built to Approved Total Total Grade and Section In In Com- Location In Total System Com- System plete Authorized Place Thru When Built plete When Built Thru for This This This Com- This This Com- This This System FY FY FY pleted i FY FY pleted FY FY MISSISSIPPI RIVER Mounds, Ill. .................. ........ 3.9 Mound City, Ill. ....................... 2.7 Cairo Drainage District ................. 13.82 City of Cairo ......................... 6.2 Little River Drainage District ............ 19.3 Levee District No.2, Scott County, Mo. ................... .. 13.8 Levee district No. 3, Mississippi County, Mo. ................. 26.0 St. Johns Levee and Drainage District ..................... 58.7s St. Francis Levee District of Mo. .......... 55.7 City of Hickman, Ky. ................... 1.4 Fulton County Levee District of Fulton County, Ky..................... 16.7 Reelfoot Levee District of Lake and Obion Counties, Tenn. .................. 4.5 Madrid Bend Levee District .............. 9.6 Lake County Levee and Drainage District ..................... 15.9 Dyer County Levee and Drainage District No. 1 ................ 21.3 Tiptonville-Obion levee extension .......... . 6.5 St. Francis Levee District of Ark. .......... 156.7 Helena Improvement District No. 1 ........ 5.3 Cotton Belt Levee District No. 1 ........... 23.9 Laconia Drainage and Levee District of Phillips County, Ark. ................ 20.5 Laconia Levee District No. 1 of Desha County. Ark. ................... 18.1 Laconia Circle Special Drainage District of Desha County. Ark. ............ 6.6 Yazoo-Mississippi Delta Levee District ............................ 93.6 3.9 2.7 13.8 6.2 19.3 13.8 26.0 58.7 55.7 1.4 16.7 4.5 9.6 15.9 21.3 156.7 5.3 23.9 20.5 18.1 6.6 3.9 2.7 13.8 6.2 19.3 - 13.8 - 26.0 - 58.2 - 55.7 - 1.4 0.3 2.7 7.8 2.9 8.0 4.2 4.9 0.9 2.4 3.6 1.1 8.5 4.0 19.3 13.8 3.2 26.0 42.7 10.6 16.74 16.3 4.54 0.6 9.6' - 15.9 - 21.3 - 153.24 - 5.3 - 23.9 7.3 13.0 94.6 2.4 13.4 20.5 8.4 18.14 6.6' 12.1 S 10.4 - - 46.6 55.1 0.5 10.6 16.3 0.3 4.5 - 9.6 4.5 15.9 - 73.9 - 2.4 - 13.4 21.3 6.5 156.7 4.7 23.9 8.4 20.5 10.6 16.5 - 3.6 - 1.1 - 8.5 - 3.5 - 19.3 - 13.8 - 26.0 - 46.1 - 55.1 - 16.3 4.3 9.6 15.9 - 21.3 - 156.7 - 4.2 - 23.9 - 20.5 - 16.5 93.6 - 93.6 85.7 i/2 C/2 0 CI) CM 1 O0 z Co 85. 7 93.6 - 93.6 TABLE 42-M (Continued) PROJECT LEVEES: MEMPHIS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1981) Levees and Floodwalls Berms (Miles)' Surfaced Roads on Levees (Miles) (Miles) Built to Approved Total Total Grade and Section In In Com- Location In Total System Com- System plete Authorized Place Thru When Built plete When Built Thru for This This This Com- This This Com- This This System FY FY FY pleted' FY FY pleted FY FY New Madrid, Mo., St. Johns Levee and Drainage District .......... .. 0.3 - 0.3 - - 0.3 - - Birds Point-New Madrid setback levee ........................ 35.3 35.3 - 35.3 35.3 - - 35.3 35.3 Total Mississippi River ............. 636.3 629.5 - 625.5 373.5 - 226.7 604.1 - 595.1 ST. FRANCIS RIVER East bank ........................... 159.5 156.2 - 156.2 - - - 156.7 - 81.7 West bank ........................... 148.7 146.7 - 146.7 - - - 144.3 - 38.8 Total St. Francis river .............. 308.2 302.9 - 302.9 - - - 301.0 - 120.5 LITTLE RIVER East bank (left) ....................... 40.7 40.7 - 40.7 - - - 40.7 - 13.1 West bank ........................... 35.1 35.1 - 35.1 - - - 35.1 - 23.7 Elk Chute .......................... 39.9 39.9 - 39.9 - - - 39.7 - 17.3 West Basin and middle valley ............ 14.4 14.4 - 14.4 - - - 13.4 - 13.4 Total Little River .................. 130.1 130.1 - 130.1 - - - 128.9 - 67.5 LOWER WHITE RIVER White River backwater levee ............. 40.2 40.2 - 40.2 - - - 38.8 - 38.8 Augusta to Clarendon .................. 49.2 39.5 - 39.5 - - - 49.2 - 36.2 Clarendon levee ....................... 6.2 6.2 - 4.4 - - - - - Total Lower White River ............ 95.6 85.9 - 84.1 - - - 88.0 - 75.0 MEMPHIS HARBOR Memphis Harbor ...................... 10.5 10.5 - 10.5 7.0 - 1.5 10.5 - 10.5 1. Subject to change as planning progresses. enlarged to 1928 grades with Federal funds, but since that time has 2. Includes 5.1 miles of Cache River levee. This levee was enlarged to 1928 grades with Federal funds, but since that time has been classified as a secondary levee. 3. Includes 12.1 miles of Farrenburg levee. This levee was been classified as a secondary levee. 4. Shown complete. Authority MSRC-ED-TL (MD 19 Mar. 80) 1st Ind. 21 Apr. 80. MN 0 OH 0 H z z rj c C10 00 I. TABLE 42-N RECAPITULATION PROJECT LEVEE TABLES 42-K, -L, AND -M (FISCAL YEAR 1981) Levees and Floodwalls Berms (Miles) Surfaced Roads on Levees (Miles) (Miles) Built to Approved Grade and Section Total Location . Total In In Com- In Total System Com- System plete Authorized Place Thru When Built plete When Built Thru for This This This Com- This This Com- This This System FY FY FY pleted FY FY pleted FY FY MISSISSIPPI RIVERMAIN STEM New Orleans District, Table 42-K ......... 511.6 511.6 Vicksburg District, Table 42-L ........... 460.4 460.4 Memphis District, Table 42-M ............ 636.3 629.5 Subtotal-Main Stem ................. 1,608.3 1,601.5 TRIBUTARIES (OFF MAIN STEM) INCLUDED IN MR&T SYSTEM Atchafalaya Basin Floodway-NOD ....... 449.2 449.2 Lower Red River-South Bank-NOD ....... 59.2 59.2 Arkansas River-South Bank-VXD ........ 85.4 85.4 Subtotal-Tribs. in MR&T System ....... 593.8 593.8 Total in MR&T System .............. 2,202.1 2,195.3 OTHER TRIBUTARIES IN MR&T PROJECT Lake Pontchartrain, La.-NOD ........... 17.4 17.4 Yazoo River Basin-VXD ............... 717.3 349.7 Arkansas River-North Bank-VXD ........ 61.5 56.2 Red River Backwater-VXD ............ 263.6 156.5 St. Francis River-MD ................. 308.2 302.9 Little River-MD ...................... 130.1 130.1 Lower White River-MD ................ 95.6 85.9 Memphis Harbor-MD ................. 10.5 10.5 Subtotal-Other Tribs. in MR&T Project ................... .. 1,604.2 1,109.2 Grand Total in Project ............... 3,806.3 3,304.5 32.3 320.6 10.1 6.7 220.1 295.1 - 625.5 373.5 39.0 1,166.2 678.7 19.0 236.1 - - 49.2 - - 85.4 24.7 19.0 370.7 24.7 58.0 1,536.9 703.4 - 17.4 5.0 130.1 - 56.2 - 81.3 - 302.9 - 130.1 - 84.1 - 10.5 1.0 1.1 479.6 10.1 216.5 442.5 - 226.7 604.1 11.1 444.3 1,526.2 - - 446.5 - - 59.2 - 24.7 84.1 - 24.7 589.8 11.1 469.0 2,116.0 - 8.3 7.0 - 5.0 812.6 15.3 63.0 2,349.5 718.7 - 8.3 1.5 17.4 717.3 47.4 249.0 301.0 128.9 88.0 10.5 - 9.8 1,559.5 11.1 478.8 3,675.5 - 479.6 - 442.5 - 545.1 - 1,467.2 6.6 126.5 8.8 42.8 - 81.1 15.4 250.4 15.4 1,717.6 - 17.4 5.0 320.5 - 47.4 - 141.9 - 120.5 - 67.5 - 75.0 - 10.5 5.0 805.7 20.4 2,523.3 -C4o Co :: CC MO -4 H 0 Co) C) H 0z -- t 3 !Cn REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 42-0 CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS: NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1981) In Total System Complete Year When Built Thru Location Initi- Com- This This Percent ated pleted FY FY Complete (Miles) Bayou des Glaise diversion channel ........................ 1938 6.0 - 6.0 100 Bayous Rapides, Boeuf, and Cocodrie ....................... 1946 92.6 - 63.4 75 Charenton drainage and navigation canal ................... 1939 6.3 - 6.3 100 Wax Lake Outlet ..................................... 1938 15.7 - 15.7 100 Atchafalaya Basin Floodway .............................. 1933 244.2 - 186.4 49 Morganza Floodway ..................................... 1941 3.3 - 3.3 100 Old River outflow channel ............................... 1956 8.3 - 7.4 89 Old River inflow channel ................................ 1960 2.3 - 0.4 17 Old River lock approach channels ......................... 1961 2.2 - 2.2 100 Baton Rouge Harbor (Devils Swamp) ....................... 1958 2.5 - 2.5 100 Eastern Rapides-S.C. Avoyelles ............................ - 83.5 - - - Teche-Vermilion Water Supply ........................... - 6.3 2.1 6.0 95 42-46 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-P CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS: VICKSBURG DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1981) In Total System Complete Year When Built Thru Location Initi- Com- This This Percent ated pleted FY FY Complete (Miles) BIG SUNFLOWER RIVER, ETC., MISS Big Sunflower River .............................. 1947 199.1 - 199.1 100 Quiver River .................................... 1947 69.6 - 69.6 100 Deer Creek ..................................... 1947 7.0 - 7.0 100 Steele Bayou .................................... 1947 54.9 - 54.9 100 Steele Bayou ..................................... 1965 71.2 - 51.6 50 Main Canal .................................... 1959 21.1 - 21.1 100 M ain Canal2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22.2 - - - Black Bayou ................................... . - 36.5 - - - Big Sunflower River tributaries ................... . 1957 227.2 - 227.2 100 Quiver River tributaries ........................... 1960 35.4 - 35.4 100 YAZOO BACKWATER Yazoo Backwater ............................... 1960 39.9 - 39.9 100 YAZOO BASIN HEADWATER, MISS. Upper Yazoo Project .............................. 1976 179.0 4.3 33.2 18 Coldwater River ................................. 1941 54.6 - 54.6 100 Arkabutla Canal ................................. 1948 0.4 - 0.4 100 Tallahatchie Canal .............................. 1940 74.8 - 73.5 85 Little Tallahatchie River and Panola-Quitman Floodway ....................... 1939 48.0 - 48.0 100 Greenwood protection works ........................ 1971 2.9 - 2.9 100 Yocona River .................................. 1952 1.8 - 1.8 100 Bobo Bayou ..................................... 1944 16.1 - 16.1 100 Cassidy Bayou ................................... 1943 69.0 - 69.0 100 Cassidy Bayou3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - 26.0 Bear Creek Diversion ............................ - 4.8 - Lake Cormorant ................................. - 20.9 - Hurricane Bayou ................................ - 2.5 - Opossum Bayou ................................. - 20.8 - Abiaca Creek .................................. - 7.7 - - - Chicopa Creek .................................. - 7.0 - - - Bear Creek ..................................... - 23.3 - - - Rocky Bayou .................................... - 7.8 - - Whiteoak Bayou ................................ - 55.9 - - Miscellaneous ditches ............................. - 12.3 - - - Yalobusha River ................................... 1939 46.0 - 46.0 100 Yazoo River ................................... 1940 160.2 - 160.2 100 Whittington Auxiliary Channel ..................... 1956 30.8 - 30.8 100 Tchula Lake .................................... 1964 26.4 - 26.4 100 David-Burrell Bayou .............................. 1957 40.4 - 40.4 100 McKinney Bayou ................................ 1960 3.5 - 3.5 100 Hillside Floodway ............................... 1964 11.0 - 11.0 100 Yazoo City protection works ....................... 1953 1.6 - 1.6 100 Ascalmore-Tippo Bayous .......................... 1975 29.8 - 15.1 50 Alligator-Catfish Bayou .......................... 1973 8.3 - 8.2 99 Pelucia Creek ................................. 1975 6.4 - 2.9 25 42-47 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 42-P CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS: VICKSBURG DISTRICT (Continued) (FISCAL YEAR 1981) In Total System Complete Year When Built Thru Location Initi- Corn- This This Percent ated pleted FY FY Complete (Miles) BOEUF & TENSAS RIVERS, ETC., LA. AND ARK. Bayou Lafourche ................................. 1949 45.3 - 45.3 100 Bayou Lafourche 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . 1972 43.0 - 4.4 10 Big & Colewa Creeks ............................... 1947 81.4 - 81.4 100 Big & Colewa Creeks5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1965 86.8 - 51.5 60 Tensas River ................................... 1947 96.5 - 96.5 100 Tensas River . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . 1968 160.0 - 61.0 38 Boeuf River. Ark. and La. .......................... 1953 103.9 - 103.9 100 Fleschmans Bayou, Ark. ........................... 1963 6.6 - 6.6 100 Caney Bayou, Ark. ............................... 1964 7.4 - 7.4 100 Canal 18, Ark ................................... 1963 10.3 - 10.3 100 Big Bayou, Ark. ................................ 1952 33.3 - 33.3 100 Black Pond Slough, Ark ........................... 1962 14.3 - 14.3 100 Bayou Macon, Ark. and La. ......................... 1959 150.8 - 150.8 100 Rush Bayou, Ark. ............................... 1964 6.7 - 6.7 100 Canal 19, Ark ................................... 1957 50.2 - 50.2 100 Canal 43, Ark ..................................... 1956 34.5 - 34.5 100 Canal 81, Ark. .................................. 1957 32.7 - 32.7 100 Mill Bayou-Bayou Vidal ........................... - 15.0 - - - Kirsch Lake Canal ............... ..... ......... - 9.3 - - - Canal 19 Extension ............................... 1964 9.4 - 9.4 100 Lake Chicot Pumping Plant ....................... - 2.5 - - - RED RIVER BACKWATER, LA. Tensas-Cocodrie Pumping Plant ........................................ 1976 6.9 - 4.6 66 Six Mile Bayou, La. ............................... . 1.5 - - - GRAND PRAIRIE, ARK .............. ......... ... - 338.1 - - - BAYOU METO, ARK. ............................. - 164.9 - - - 1. Includes further work on 54.9 miles and adds 16.3 miles of 5. Includes further work on 75.3 miles and adds 11.5 miles of channel to the project. channel to the project. 2. Includes further work on 21.1 miles and adds 1.1 miles of 6. Includes further work on 96.5 miles and adds 63.5 additional channel to the project. miles of channel to the project. 3. Includes further work on 26.0 miles. 4. Includes further work on 38.6 miles and adds 4.4 miles of channel to the project. 42-48 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-Q CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS: MEMPHIS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1981) In Total System Complete Year When Built Thru Location Initi- Com- This This Percent ated pleted FY FY Complete (Miles) BIRDS POINT-NEW MADRID FLOODWAY Birds Point-New Madrid Intercepting Ditch Enlargement, Samos and Vicinity, Mo. ................... 1952 9.6 - 9.5 100 ST. FRANCIS BASIN Little River Drainage, Mo.............................. 1963 291.3 - 208.7 72 St. Francis River, Mo. and Ark.......................... 1953 574.2 10.6 335.8 57 West Memphis Drainage, Ark. ............................ 1951 19.8 - 19.8 100 Big Slough and Mayo Ditch, Ark ........................... 1960 28.0 - 28.0 100 Tyronza River, Ark, ..................................... 1939 12.7 - 12.7 100 L'Anguille River, Ark. ................................... (1) 112.0 - - - LOWER WHITE RIVER BASIN, ARK. Cache River Basin, Ark. .................................. 1972 231.5 - 7.2 3 Big Creek and tributaries, Ark. ............................ (1) 103.8 - - - WEST KENTUCKY TRIBUTARIES Obion Creek, Ky .......................................... (1) 41.7 WEST TENNESSEE TRIBUTARIES Miss. River, Western Tenn. tributaries. (Backwater Areas) (1946 Act) ............................ 1952 34.3 - 34.3 100 Obion River Diversion Channel, Tenn. (1946 Act) ....................................... (1) 9.3 Reelfoot Lake-Lake No. 9, Ky. and Tenn........................................... 1974 15.8 - 3.0 19 Running Reelfoot Bayou, Tenn. ............................ 1955 19.7 - 19.7 100 Miss. River Below Cape Girardeau; West Tenn. tributaries. (1948 Act) ............................ 1961 225.0 - 84.8 38 Wolf River and tributaries, Tenn. .......................... 1960 25.5 - 25.5 100 1. Not started. 42-49 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 42-R COSTS DURING FISCAL YEAR 1981 Item Construction Maintenance Other FEDERAL FUNDS Flood control, Mississippi River and tributaries: Memphis District: General investigations Advance engineering and design Mississippi River levees St. Francis Basin Lower White River Cache Basin, Ark. Channel improvement West Tennessee tributaries West Kentucky tributaries Inspection of completed works Mapping Recreation facilities-completed projects Reelfoot Lake No. 9, Tenn.-Ky. Mud Lake, Tenn. 278,685 2,955,554 8,778,194 27,109 3,567,248 1,559,985 32,414 78,233 89,553 21,044 912,068 5,561,336 245,175 22,627,765 90,725 35,547 Subtotal Vicksburg District: General investigations Advance engineering and design Mississippi River levees Lower Arkansas River Tensas Basin Yazoo Basin Channel improvement Mapping Inspection of completed works Streambank erosion control Subtotal New Orleans District: General investigations Advance engineering and design Mississippi River levees Lower Red River Old River Bayou Cocodrie and tributaries Atchafalaya Basin Channel improvement Bonnet Carre Teche-Vermilion Basin water supply Inspection of completed works Mapping Major Rehabilitation Old River Subtotal Total Federal Funds 17,388,019 29,472,616 1,757,459 -- -- 1,727,314 44,554 -- -- 9,688,061 389,025 -- -- 91,135 -- 18,732,162 192,577 -- 22,025,582 14,093,120 -- 8,474,367 10,288,259 -- -- 156,755 -- -- 94,833 -- 478,944 -- -- 59,443,670 25,305,704 1,727,314 -- -- 616,764 177,268 -- -- 12,541,807 2,364,705 -- 440,503 102,589 -- 10,001,248 4,531,523 -- 106,709 42,030 -- 25,203,865 5,086,880 -- 25,450,509 10,368,245 -- -- 273,682 -- 11,838,797 -- -- -- 108,738 -- -- 18,109 -- -- 13,151,406 -- 85,760,706 36,047,907 616,764 162,592,395 90,826,227 4,101,537 42-50 $ 1,757,459 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-R COSTS DURING FISCAL YEAR 1981 (Continued) Item Construction Maintenance Other CONTRIBUTED FUNDS Memphis District: St. Francis River-Huxtable Pumping Plant 1,876 New Orleans District: Old River -- 45,633 -- Mississippi River Levees -- 99,621 -- Teche-Vermilion Basin Total Contributed Funds 1,876 145,254 -- Grand Total, Federal and Contributed Funds 162,594,271 90,971,481 4,101,537 42-51 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 42-S STATEMENTS OF ALLOTMENTS AND ACCRUED EXPENDITURES FOR FLOOD CONTROL, MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, FROM MAY 15, 1928, THROUGH SEP. 30, 1981 Unexpended Accrued Balance District or Installation and Class of Work Allotments Expenditures Sep. 30,1981 ALLOTMENTS AND ACCRUED EXPENDITURES CHARGEABLE AGAINST FLOOD CONTROL ACT LIMITATIONS: COMPLETED WORKS: Waterways Experiment Station Office, Chief of Engineers Rock Island District: S. G. & O. prior to Aug. 18, 1941 St. Louis District: S. G. & O. prior to Aug. 18, 1941 Subtotal Memphis District: Des Arc, Ark. Contraction works DeValls Bluff, Ark. Mapping Memphis Harbor New Madrid Floodway Wolf River and tributaries Roads on levees (Mississippi River levees) S. G. & O. prior to Aug. 18, 1941 Subtotal Vicksburg District: Boeuf Basin levees Channel realignment, Arkansas River Contraction works Eudora Floodway Vicksburg Harbor Greenville Harbor Grants Canal (Mississippi River levees) Mapping Jonesville, La. Roads on levees S. G. & O. prior to Aug. 18, 1941 Subtotal New Orleans District: Baton Rouge Harbor, La. Atchafalaya River and Basin, La. Bonnet Carr6 Spillway, La. Contraction works Mapping Roads on levees S. G. & O. prior to Aug. 18, 1941 Wax Lake Outlet and Charenton Canal Morganza Floodway and structure Lake Pontchartrain Atchafalaya Basin, rights-of-way and flowage, Bayou des Glaises setback Subtotal All other completed items: Surveys under Sec. 10, Flood Control Act of 1928 Impounded savings Plant transferred to revolving fund OCE (portion of allotment transferred to revolving fund, Washington Dist.) Subtotal Total completed works $ 874,000 19,158 14,010 $ 874,000 19,158 14,010 169,352 169,352 -- 1,076,520 1,076,520 -- 178,925 178,925 -- 8,692,791 8,692,791 -- 231,215 231,215 -- 1,450,337 1,450,337 -- 18,736,432 18,736,432 -- 6,521,543 6,521,543 -- 1,723,620 1,723,620 12,426 12,426 -- 1,998,766 1,998,766 -- 39,546,055 39,546,055 -- 2,764,605 2,764,605 -- 125,074 125,074 -- 1,972,183 1,972,183 -- 826,235 826,235 -- 4,664,515 4,664,515 -- 2,864,516 2,864,516 -- 7,070 7,070 -- 1,531,021 1,531,021 -- 172,950 172,950 -- 105,660 105,660 -- 2,350,201 2,350,201 -- 17,384,030 17,384,030 -- 699,185 699,185 -- 3,375,492 3,375,492 -- 14,212,198 14,212,198 -- 1,258,916 1,258,916 -- 1,112,967 1,112,967 -- 540,838 540,838 -- 2,701,566 2,701,566 -- 10,098,817 10,098,817 -- 35,992,117 35,992,117 -- 5,513,110 5,513,110 -- 387,917 387,917 -- 75,893,123 75,893,123 -- 4,995,215 4,995,215 -- 1,593,097 1,593,097 -- 24,924,578 24,924,578 -- 19,882 19,882 -- 31,532,772 31,532,772 -- 165,432,500 165,432,500 -- 42-52 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-S STATEMENTS OF ALLOTMENTS AND ACCRUED (Continued) EXPENDITURES FOR FLOOD CONTROL, MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, FROM MAY 15, 1928, THROUGH SEP. 30, 1981 Unexpended Accrued Balance District or Installation and Class of Work Allotments Expenditures Sep. 30,1981 UNCOMPLETED WORKS: Rock Island District: Levees under Sec. 6, Flood Control Act of 1928 $ 579,462 $ 579,462 $ St. Louis District: Levees under Sec. 6, Flood Control Act of 1928 1,897,980 1,897,980 -- Subtotal 2,477,442 2,477,442 -- Memphis District: Mississippi River levees: Mississippi River levees 139,451,354 139,292,916 158,438 New Madrid 98,000 98,000 -- Channel improvement: Revetments 295,211,307 295,132,184 79,123 Dredging 56,352,400 56,347,186 5,214 Dikes 83,674,000 83,607,067 66,933 Reelfoot Lake 439,434 439,434 Reelfoot Lake, Lake No. 9, Tenn.-Ky. 7,765,000 7,752,387 12,613 St. Francis Basin: Wappapello Lake 9,019,908 9,019,908 -- St. Francis River and tributaries 164,669,382 164,290,858 378,524 Big Slough and Mayo ditch 965,429 965,429 -- Little River drainage 37,269,892 37,183,828 86,064 Lower White River: Clarendon levee, Ark. 496,715 496,715 -- Augusta to Clarendon, Ark. 1,779,846 1,779,846 -- White River backwater levee, Ark. 10,624,502 10,624,502 -- Levees under Sec. 6, Flood Control Act of 1928 108,651 108,651 -- West Tennessee tributaries 21,770,900 21,491,265 279,635 Cache Basin, Ark. 8,050,000 7,882,701 167,299 West Kentucky tributaries 990,000 957,366 32,634 Mud Lake, Tenn. 40,000 32,936 7,064 Subtotal 838,776,720 837,503,179 1,273,541 Vicksburg Distict: Mississippi River levees (excludes Grants Canal, $7,070, shown under completed works) 166,683,990 166,618,346 65,644 Lower Arkansas River: North Bank 7,049,414 7,049,414 -- South Bank 15,676,286 15,676,286 -- Tensas Basin: Boeuf and Tensas Rivers, etc. 39,272,000 39,229,570 42,430 Red River backwater levee, La. 44,428,046 44,362,420 65,626 Tensas, Cocodrie pumping plant 23,598,300 23,545,826 52,474 Lake Chicot pumping plant 35,305,600 35,239,359 66,241 Channel improvement: Revetments 281,589,065 281,263,466 325,599 Dredging 23,549,260 23,549,260 -- Dikes 60,557,040 60,414,475 142,565 Levees under Sec. 6, Flood Control Act of 1928 958,175 958,175 Yazoo Basin: Sardis Lake 25,266,600 24,870,456 396,144 Enid Lake 21,335,400 21,260,214 75,186 Arkabutla Lake 16,081,700 16,012,603 69,097 Grenada Lake 43,399,900 42,984,430 415,470 Greenwood 7,679,000 7,524,578 154,422 Belzoni 316,656 316,656 -- Yazoo City 2,205,611 2,205,611 Will M. Whittington auxiliary channel 10,950,966 10,950,966 42-53 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 42-S STATEMENTS OF ALLOTMENTS AND ACCRUED (Continued) EXPENDITURES FOR FLOOD CONTROL, MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, FROM MAY 15, 1928, THROUGH SEP. 30, 1981 Unexpended Accrued Balance District or Installation and Class of Work Allotments Expenditures Sep. 30,1980 Vicksburg District: (Continued) Yazoo Basin: (Continued) Main Stem Tributaries Tributaries-Bank Stabilization Ascalmore-Tippo-Opossum Bayous Big Sunflower, etc. Yazoo backwater Yazoo backwater-Muddy Bayou Upper auxiliary channel Steambank erosion control, evaluation and demonstration Subtotal New Orleans District: Teche-Vermilion basin water study Bayou Cocodrie and tributaries Channel improvement: Dredging Revetments Lower Red River (south bank levees) Levees under Sec. 6, Flood Control Act of 1928 Mississippi River levees Atachafalaya Basin: Atachafalaya Basin Floodway Atachafalaya River navigation Old River Subtotal Total uncompleted projects ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN (CONSTRUCTION) Memphis District: L'Anguille River Basin, Ark. Reelfoot Lake, Lake No. 9 Cache River Big Creek and tributaries, Lower White River Clarendon Levee, Lower White River West Kentucky tributaries Mud Lake pumping station, Tenn. Harris Fork Creek, Ky. & Tenn. Subtotal Vicksburg District: Yazoo Basin, Big Sunflower River, Steele Bayou Tensas National Wildlife Refuge, La. Subtotal New Orleans District: Mississippi Delta Region Teche-Vermilion.basin water supply E. Rapides and south central Avoyelles Parishes Subtotal Total advance engineering and design Total completed works, uncompleted works and advance engineering and design $ 21,004,000 39,181,310 612,484 11,857,200 25,903,300 50,143,200 5,145,200 27,704,006 14,327,000 1,021,780,709 23,690,000 4,089,007 35,945,266 336,601,117 17,996,000 200,680 151,238,000 387,215,537 303,463 87,347,000 $ 20,997,458 38,689,880 612,484 11,749,671 25,681,017 50,020,890 5,145,200 27,135,104 14,061,097 1,018,124,912 22,855,805 4,088,989 35,945,266 335,970,428 17,944,837 200,680 150,254,396 385,424,514 303,463 87,111,684 $ 6,542 491,430 107,529 222,283 122,310 568,902 265,903 3,655,797 834,195 18 630,689 51,163 983,604 1,791,023 235,316 1,044,626,070 1,040,100,062 4,526,008 2,907,660,941' 2,898,205,595 9,455,346 150,000 140,491 9,509 30,000 30,000 -- 420,000 420,000 -- 365,000 364,303 697 65,000 65,000 -- 175,000 175,000 -- 350,000 350,000 -- 540,000 488,703 51,297 2,095,000 2,033,497 61,503 29,700 29,700 -- 200,000 44,554 155,446 229,700 74,254 155,446 69,753 69,753 -- 1,109,000 1,109,000 -- 965,247 806,290 158,957 2,144,000 1,985,043 158,957 4,468,700 4,092,794 375,906 3,077,562,141 3,067,730,889 9,831,252 42-54 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-S STATEMENTS OF ALLOTMENTS AND ACCRUED (Continued) EXPENDITURES FOR FLOOD CONTROL, MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, FROM MAY 15, 1928, THROUGH SEP. 30, 1981 Unexpended Accrued Balance District or Installation and Class of Work Allotments Expenditures Sep. 30,1980 RECREATION FACILITIES-COMPLETED PROJECTS Eight-Year Program Funds Memphis District: Wappapello Lake, Mo. $ 1,078,300 $ 1067,285 $ 11,015 Wappapello Lake, Mo., Rockwood Landing 203,286 203,286 -- Subtotal 1,281,586 1,270,571 11,015 Vicksburg District: Sardis Lake 1,584,339 1,584,339 -- Enid Lake 2,268,209 2,268,209 -- Arkabutla Lake 2,189,280 2,189,280 -- Grenada Lake 1,631,281 1,631,281 -- Subtotal 7,673,109 7,673,109 -- Total Eight-Year Program Funds 8,954,695 8,943,680 11,015 Total chargeable against Flood Control Act Limitations excluding flood control emergencies 3,086,516,836 3,076,674,569 9,842,267 Total maintenance since Aug. 18, 1941 1,102,210,855 1,094,029,409 8,181,446 Total rehabilitation 31,850,000 30,792,192 1,057,808' Total flood control emergencies 14,900,300 14,900,300 -- Total general investigations 32,631,881 32,310,044 321,837 Total flood control, MR&T appropriations 4,268,109,872 4,248,706,514 19,403,358 Appropriations in addition to flood control, MR&T Other appropriations itemized in footnote (1), pp. 2068-69, Annual Report for 1953 32,068,909 32,068,909 -- Grand total appropriated to Sep. 30, 1981 4,300,178,781 4,280,775,423 19,403,358 Note: Preauthorization study costs chargeable to the MR&T authorization have been transferred to completed work. Costs not chargeable have been exluded from this report. TABLE 42-T STATEMENT OF EXPENDITURES FOR LEVEES BY STATE AND LOCAL ORGANIZATIONS THROUGH DEC. 31, 1980 Engineer District Expenditures Rock Island $ 10,977,836 St. Louis 61,594,568 Memphis 208,888,384 Vicksburg 83,462,209 New Orleans 430,291,903 Total $795,214,900 42-55 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 42-U COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT1 Total Project Funding FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 Sep. 30, 1981 Mississippi River General investigations: and tributaries Alloted 2,705,000 2,979,000 3,090,000 3,720,000 32,631,8812 (Regular Funds)' Cost 2,851,968 3,174,950 3,185,080 4,101,537 32,310,044 Construction (includes advance engineering and design): Alloted 171,502,300 154,682,286 134,796,000 140,644,000 3,036,674,422 Cost 174,524,955 161,036,108 161,368,655 162,592,395 3,026,832,157 Maintenance Alloted 62,080,000 64,973,000 67,837,000 79,794,000 1,152,589,406 Cost 56,171,198 65,355,105 71,662,120 77,674,822 1,144,407,959 Rehabilitations Alloted 11,000,000 8,200,000 4,500,000 8,150,000 31,850,000 Cost 7,426,312 4,789,600 5,424,874 13,151,406 30,792,192 Flood control emergencies (Maintenance): Alloted -- -- -- -- 14,885,922 Cost -- -- -- -- 14,885,922 (Contributed Funds) New Work: Contributed 5,000 68,500 193,871 53,201 8,764,830 Cost 4,011 68,663 198,812 1,876 8,708,667 Maintenance Contributed 70,948 76,245 427,594 54,930 1,461,564 Cost 72,731 99,397 316,015 145,254 1,429,911 1. Appropriations were as follows: Appropriations chargeable against Flood Control Act authorizations: Flood Control, MR&T except for emergencies (excludes Maintenance allotments Aug. 18, 1941, through Sep. 30, 1981): Net total allotted for works under Mississippi River Commission: $3,077,879,369 Eight-Year Program Funds, Construction General: 8,954,695 Surveys under Sec. 10, Flood Control Act of 1928 (not under MRC): 4,995,215 Transferred to revolving fund: 24,944,460 Impounded savings: 1,593,097 $3,118,366,836 Flood control emergencies: Net total alloted: 14,885,922 Impounded savings: 14,378 14,900,300 Additional funds not chargeable against Flood Control Act authorizations: Appropriations for Flood Control, MR&T, except for flood control emergencies: General investigations: 32,631,881 Maintenance allotments Aug. 18, 1941, through Sep. 30, 1981 1,102,210,855 1,134,842,736 Appropriations in addition to appropriations for Flood Control, MR&T (itemized in footnote (1), pp. 2068-69, Annual Report for 1953): 32,068,909 Budgetary and OCE Reserves: Grand total: 4,300,178,781 Reconciliation of appropriations and allotments: Total allotted to Sep. 30, 1981 4,268,631,631 Transferred to revolving fund: 24,944,460 Surveys under Sec. 10, Flood Control Act of 1928 (not under MRC): 4,995,215 Impounded savings withdrawn by Chief of Engineers: 1,607,475 Budgetary and OCE Reserves: 4,300,178,781 Total Appropriations to Sep. 30, 1981: Appropriations for past four reporting periods were as follows: FY 78: $247,287,300; FY 79: $230,834,286; FY 80: $210,223,000 and FY 81: $232,308,000. 2. Totals for General Investigations include four projects transferred from Construction totals per DAEN-CWB-W, Aug. 4, 78, teletype. 42-56 Coastal Engineering Research Center The 88th Congress passed Public Law 172 establishing the U.S. Army Coastal Engineering Research Center (CERC). This public law abolished the former Beach Erosion Board (organized under authority of Sec. 2, 1930 River & Harbor Act, as amended (33 U.S.C. 426) and transferred its functions, other than review of investigation reports of erosion and shore protection of coastal and lake waters, to CERC. The Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors is responsible for reviwing the investigation reports, which puts beach erosion control reports and shore protection studies under the same review procedures as other water resources study programs of the Corps. The Coastal Engineering Research Board (CERB) gives guidance and advice to CERC and is similar to the former Beach Erosion Board. CERB has seven members: four senior officers of the Corps of Engineers, three of whom are normally division engineers of coastal and Great Lakes divisions, and three prominent civilians outstanding in the coastal engineering field. CERB is an advisory board to the Chief of Engineers, who makes all appointments. CERB meets semiannually, or at the call of the President, to consider the Corps' coastal engineering research program. It provides broad policy guidance and geviews plans and fund requirements for conducting coastal engineering and development. It also recommends research project priorities and performs other duties as assigned by the Chief of Engineers. During fiscal year 1981, the following served as members of CERB; Major General E.R. Heiberg III, Director of Civil Works, Office Chief of Engineers, President; Major General Richard M. Wells, Division Engineer, North Pacific Division; Brigadier General Hugh G. Robinson, Division Engineer, Southwest Division; Major General Bennett L. Lewis, Division Engineer, Nother Atlantic Division; Dr. Robert G. Dean, Professor of Civil Engineering and Marine Studies, University of Delaware; and Professor Robert L. Wiegel, Department of Civil Engineering, University of California at Berkley. Colonel Ted E. Bishop served as Executive Secretary to the Board and Commander and Director of the Center. CERC is the principal research and development facility of the Corps in the coastal engineering field. Its mission is to conceive, plan, and conduct research and data collection in coastal engineering and nearshore oceanography to provide a better understanding of the littoral forces (e. g., waves, winds, tides, etc.) and the interaction of these forces with shores and beaches, coastal and offshore structures, and the materials forming them. It provides scientific and engineering data and design criteria, and determines the effects of the Corps' coastal activities on the ecology of the coastal zone. It conducts research on shore and beach erosion control; flood and storm protection; the location, layout, design, construction, operation,and maintenance of harbor and coastal and offshore structures, and the materials forming them. It provides scientific and engineering data and design criteria, and determines the effects of the Corps' coastal activities on the ecology of the coastal zone. It conducts research on shore and beach erosion control; flood and storm protection; the location, layout, design, construction, operation, and maintenance of harbor and coastal and offshore structures; navigation improvement; and recreation. It provides consulting services to the Corps and other public agencies as requested or directed, on the planning and design of coastal and offshore works; coastal and nearshore phenomena; and related engineering and environmental problems. It reviews studies and plans and specifications for coastal and offshore engineering works. It operates a Coastal Engineering Information and Analysis Center to collect, evaluate, analyze, and disseminate coastal engineering information. Operations and Results. The staff of CERC provided consulting services and reviewed Corps projects in beach erosion control, navigation, and coastal ecology. In keeping with the responsibility for publishing coastal phenomena information and data, CERC published a number of technical reports by staff members and is currently editing others. CERC issued five technical papers, nine miscellaneous reports, fourteen coastal engineering technical aids, and two special reports. CERC issued as reprints seven technical papers by its staff published elsewhere in the technical press. Staff members gave a course in coastal engineering, specifically on the Shore Protection Manual and its use, to universities and technical and nontechnical groups. Members of the staff participated in a number of committees of various technical societies (particularly ASCE). One staff member served as a U.S. delegate to the Permanent International Association of Navigation Congresses meeting in Edinburgh, Scotland. CERC contracted out supplementary research to universities, institutions, and commercial concerns. It provided funds to other Corps offices for data collection and to the Waterways Experiment Station to assist in carrying out laboratory portions of the generalized tidal inlet study and weir jetty study. The recently completed CERC Field Research Facility located at Duck, North Carolina, is a 1,840-foot concrete and steel pier and 4,600 sq. ft. laboratory building. The Facility has a nine-member permanent staff. CERC has established a basic environmental measurements program at the Facility to routinely measure, record, and publish data on the meterological and oceanographic conditions at the site. CERC has installed wave height and pe;riod gages, current meters, temperature and salinity gages. The National Oceanographic Survey of the Department of Commerce has installed tide gages; and the National Weather Services, a weather station. At the end of the year, the staff had work and studies in progress in wave data analysis techniques; analysis of wave spectra; sources of sand for use as beach fill; development of criteria for evaluating suitability characteristics for beach fill; relation of longshore transport to incident waves; techniques for measuring longshore transport rates; wave direction measurements (including use of radar); use of vegetation for shoreline stabilization; coastal siltation problems peculiar to the Alaskan environment; use of remote sensing in coastal studies; geomorphology of the Atlantic, Great Lakes and Gulf coastal zone; ecological effects of rubble structures; correlation of wave climate and beach deformation; effects of longterm water level changes in the Great Lakes; wave refraction, and effects on design waves; development of standardized coastal revetment designs; and evaluation of completed work. 43-1 CALIFORNIA DEBRIS COMMISSION* This Commission, consisting of three Corps officers appointed by the President with the consent of the Senate, created by act of March 1, 1893 (27 Stat. L., p. 507), was organized in San Francisco, Calif., on June 8, 1893, and has jurisdiction and duties extending over drainage area of Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers, comprising great central valley of California and extending from crest of the Sierra Nevada on the east to that of the Coast Range on the west, and from Mount Shasta and Pit River Basin on the north to Tehachapi Mountains on the south. These rivers empty into head of Suisun Bay ultimately discharging into Pacific Ocean through connecting bays and straits and the Golden Gate. Duties of the Commission comprise regulation of hydraulic mining in drainage area of Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers, Calif., so that debris will not be carried into navigable waters or otherwise cause damage; jurisdiction over construction and control of water storage facilities for domestic, irrigation, and power development purposes; and direction of improvements for control of floods on Sacramento River. IMPROVEMENTS NaJra(J tion Page 1. Regulation of hydraulic mining and preparation of plans ............................ 44-1 2. Sacramento River and tributaries, Calif. (debris control)........................... 44-1 Nav igation ((Cont'd) 3. Treatment of Yuba River debris siLuationrestraining barriers, Calif ....................... Flood( Cot rol 4. Sacramento River, Calif ......... .......... Navigation 1. REGULATION OF HYDRAULIC MINING AND PREPARATION OF PLANS Location. Operations largely limited to territory between Mount Lassen on the north and Yosemite Valley on the south, on western watershed of Sierra Nevada. (See Geological Survey sheets for the area, 25 in number.) Existing project. Provides for regulating hydraulic mining operations, planning improvement of conditions upon Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers and their tributaries affected by such operations, and preparation of plans to enable hydraulic mining to be resumed in their drainage areas. In addition, the Secretary of the Army is authorized to enter into contracts to supply storage for water and use of outlet facilities from debris-storage reservoirs for domestic and irrigation purposes and power development upon such conditions of delivery, use, and payment as he may approve. Applications of prospective miners are fully investigated by California Debris Commission and permits to operate are issued to those who provide satisfactory debris-restraining basins by construction of suitable dams where necessary or agree to make payment for storage in Governmentconstructed debris-restraining reservoirs constructed under act of June 19, 1934, as set forth below. For location and description of Government-constructed, debris-restraining reservoirs for general hydraulic mining, see Improvement 2. (See table 44-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Mineowners must bear all expenses incurred in complying with orders of the Commission for regulation of mining and restraint of debris. Operations and results during fiscal year. Minor administrative duties were accomplished. Administrative work overlaps that of improvements 2, 3, and 4, hereunder, and that of Sacramento District. Condition at end of fiscal year. The Commission received 1,292 applications for hydraulic mining licenses; 1 mine is licensed, but does not use storage behind Government debris dams. Work remaining is, in general, continuation of above or similar operations. 2. SACRAMENTO RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, CALIF. (DEBRIS CONTROL) Location. Project reservoirs are to be constructed in watersheds of Yuba, Bear, and American Rivers, Calif. (See Geological Survey sheets for basin areas, seven in number.) Existing project. For description of completed North Fork and Harry L. Englebright projects and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1975. Initial recreation facilities were provided in fiscal year 1959. Recreation areas at Harry L. *All cost an(l financial statements are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear the end of this chapter. 44-1 Page 44-2 44-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 Englebright Dam are maintained by the Corps. Recreation areas at North Fork Dam are no longer maintained and operated by Auburn Recreation Park and Parkway District, but have been turned over to the Bureau of Reclamation (known as the Water and Power Resources Service between November 6, 1979, and May 18, 1981) on a permit basis. Total Federal cost of new work for construction of these reservoirs was $4,646,872, including $40,000 and $25,000, respectively, for basic recreation facilities at Englebright Dam and North Fork Dam. Reservoir project sites on Middle Fork of American River and on Bear River have been deauthorized and excluded from foregoing cost. The 90-day Congressional project review period, required by sec. 12, Public Law 93-251, as amended, ended August 5, 1977, and resulted in deauthorization of that portion of the project. Estimated cost of that portion is $1,820,000 (1935). Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Improvements made to facilities at North Fork Dam by Auburn Recreation Park and Parkway District under a lease agreement with the Secretary of the Army and Auburn Boat Clubs (concessionaire) at an estimated cost of $46,000 since September 1953. On March 1, 1979, lands and waters at North Fork Dam were turned over to the Bureau of Reclamation on a 5-year renewable basis. Bureau will operate and maintain such use until Auburn project is completed, then a fee transfer will be made. Actual operation and maintenance of the recreation resource is being done by State of California by contract with the Bureau. Licenses. Under provisions of Contract No. W-1105-eng- 2998 with Pacific Gas and Electric Co., payment is to be made to the Federal Government of $18,000 per year for the first 30 years (December 29, 1942 through December 28, 1972) and $48,000 per year between December 29, 1972, and December 28, 1992, in return for use of head at Englebright Dam and generation of hydroelectric power. Total payment through September 30, 1981, amounts to $942,393; these funds are paid to California Debris Commission and deposited for return to the Treasury. License No. 2246, effective April 9, 1970 (date New Narrows powerplant put in operation) was issued by Federal Power Commission (known as the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission since January 9, 1978) to Yuba County Water Agency for hydroelectric power development of Yuba River by the company upstream from Englebright Dam. Under provisions of Contract No. DA-04-167-CIVENG-66-95 with Yuba County Water Agency, payment is to be made to the Federal Government of $100,000 per year for no more than 50 years. First payment (partial) of $73,151 was made April 1, 1971; total payment through September 30, 1981, amounts to $1,073,151. These funds are paid to Sacramento District and deposited for return to the Treasury. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance and operation activities continued at North Fork Dam at a cost of $2,131; and at Harry L. Englebright Dam at a cost of $415,972, including recreation facilities (replaced a boat house at contract cost of $57,391). Dam safety assurance studies were initiated at Englebright Dam at a fiscal year cost of $40,666. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of dams was initiated in 1937; North Fork project was completed and in use at end of fiscal year 1939, and Harry L. Englebright project was completed in January 1941. The two debriscontrol structures are in good condition. Public use of these reservoir recreation areas greatly overtaxes present capacities. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated at Englebright Dam in fiscal year 1981. 3. TREATMENT OF YUBA RIVER DEBRIS SITUATIONRESTRAINING BARRIERS, CALIF. Location. Works are on Yuba River between Marysville and where the river emerges from the foothills, near Hammonton, some 10 miles easterly from Marysville, or about 9 miles below the Narrows. (See Geological Survey Topographic map of Sacramento Valley, Calif.) Existing project. For description of completed project and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1975. Total cost of new work was $723,259, of which $361,482 was U.S. funds and $361,777 required contributed funds by State of California. (For details of project in its original form, see Annual Report, 1917, p. 1810.) In February 1963, center section of dam failed and major rehabilitation of structure was completed in December 1964. Total cost for required rehabilitation was $1,660,000, of which $830,000 was Federal cost and $830,000 required contribution by State of California toward rehabilitation cost. During the December 24, 1964, floodflows on the Yuba River, the rehabilitated Daguerre Point Dam sustained considerable damage. (See 1965 Annual Report, p. 1647 "O()perations and results during fiscal year.") The reconstructed portion of the dam completed earlier in December 1964 was undamaged by the flood. Permanent repair of Daguerre Point Dam abutment and fish facilities was completed in October 1965 at a cost of $447,808 with Federal and required State contributed funds on a matching basis. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for new work and major rehabilitation work. Total first cost to local interests for new work was $361,777 (required contribution by State of California). In addition, training walls were built on each bank below Daguerre Point for 11,250 feet and just above I)aguerre Point, on the south bank, for 11,000 linear feet by two gold-dredging companies in connection with their dredging operations. To build these training walls would have cost the United States $450,000 (1902 estimate). Flood channels were also built by gold-dredging companies within confines of project works. Cost to the United States of equally effective works to restrain debris movement would have been more than $776,000 (1926 estimate). Total costs to local interests for initial and permanent major rehabilitation works were $830,000 and $223,904, respectively, (required contribution by State of California). State of California must contribute annually an amount equal to the Federal allotment for maintenance. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operations included condition and operation studies by hired labor; and snagging and clearing, Yuba River, various locations upstream from Marysville completed by contract, $4,999. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of project works was initiated in November 1902. Construction of Daguerre Point Dam was completed in May 1906; diversion of river over dam was completed in 1910; training walls and dikes were completed in 1935. About 149 million cubic yards of debris are held in lower 7 miles of Yuba River between Marysville and downstream end of training walls. About 20 million cubic yards are confined in river channel by Daguerre Point Dam. Additional millions of yards of loose material are in mine tailing fields adjacent to project training walls in upper 7-mile reach of project. Initial rehabilitation of Daguerre Point Dam begun in July 1963 was completed in December 1964. Contract for permanent rehabilitation of structure was initiated in July and completed in October 1965. 44-2 CALIFORNIA DEBRIS COMMISSION Flood Control 4. SACRAMENTO RIVER, CALIF. Location. Works covered by this improvement are on Sacramento River and tributaries in north-central California from Collinsville to Ordbend, a distance of 184 miles. Previous project. For details see page 1815 of Annual Report for 1917, page 1995 of Annual Report for 1938, and page 2262 of Annual Report for 1907. Existing project. Sacramento River flood control project is a comprehensive plan of flood control for Sacramento River and lower reaches of its principal tributaries. Improvement extends along Sacramento River from Ordbend in Glenn County, Calif., 184 miles downstream to its mouth at Collinsville at upper end of Suisun Bay, and comprises a system of levees, overflow weirs, drainage pumping plants, and flood bypass channels or floodways designed to carry surplus floodwaters without inundation of valley lands. About 980 miles of levee construction, with an average height of 15 feet, and 98 miles of bank protection are involved in project. For further details, see Annual Report for 1962, page 2115. (See table 44-B for authorizing legislation.) Estimated (October 1981) cost for existing project (exclusive of supplemental levee improvements, see table 44-B), including new work and maintenance, is $173,560,000 of which $78,560,000 is Federal cost and $95 million non- Federal ($90,050,562 for lands and damages and relocations and $4,949,438 required contributed funds for levee construction, bank protection works, and levee setbacks). Of this amount, $4,939,752 was for new work and $9,686 for maintenance. In addition to project requirements, local interests constructed several pumping plants for drainage of agricultural and urban land protected by project levees. Some channel clearing work was accomplished by State of California and other local interests to supplement project levee construction. Dredging below Cache Slough and reconstruction of Cache Creek settling basin weir are considered deferred and excluded from foregoing cost estimate. Estimated cost (July 1962) of these project units is $2,560,000 and $520,000, respectively, a total of $3,080,000 plus U.S. costs, for construction. Operation and maintenance of completed project will be responsibility of local interests; as units of project are completed, they are transferred to agencies of State of California for operation and maintenance. Existing project was adopted by 1917 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 81, 62d Cong., 1st sess., as modified by Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 5, 63d Cong., 1st sess.), 1928 Flood Control Act (S. Doc. 23, 69th Cong., 1st sess.), River and Harbor Act of 1937 (S. Committee print 75th Cong., 1st sess.), and 1941 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 205, 77th Cong., 1st sess.). Local cooperation. Local interests have fully complied with requirements for all work completed or under contract, and indicated they will be able to fulfill requirements for remaining work as scheduled. Local interests costs from required contributed funds for project work total $4,949,438 for levee construction, bank protection works, and levee setbacks, of which $4,939,752 was for new work and $9,686 for maintenance. Operations and results during fiscal year. Regular funds: Levee repair to right bank Yolo Bypass and left bank Cache Slough completed by contract, $57,595. Reconnaissance report regarding correction of project deficiencies, Cache Slough, Yolo Bypass levee (Unit 109), Knights Landing ridge cut and Colusa Drain levees (Units 127 and 132), Sacramento River, was submitted July 8, 1981. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of existing project began in fiscal year 1918 and is about 99 percent complete. Channel improvement to date has produced a channel with a capacity of 579,000 cubic feet per second in Sacramento River below Cache Slough. In addition, discharges up to 21,000 cubic feet per second can be diverted from Sacramento River through Georgiana Slough. Completed major project items include about 977 miles of levees; five weirs with a combined discharge capacity of 602,000 cubic feet per second; two cutoff channels; two sets of outfall gates; channel improvement and clearing in Sacramento River, Butte Creek, Putah Creek, and Sutter and Tisdale Bypasses; construction of two main bypasses or floodways and secondary bypasses at Tisdale and Sacramento weirs and at Wadsworth Canal; construction of Knights Landing ridge cut and of Cache Creek settling basin; installation of gaging stations; and enlargement of Sacramento River below Cache Slough. Cutoffs at Collins Eddy and between Wild Irishman and Kinneys Bends were made in 1918 and 1919, respectively. Sacramento weir was completed in 1917, Fremont weir in 1924, Tisdale and Moulton weirs in 1932, and Colusa weir in 1933. Outfall gates at Knights Landing were constructed in 1930 and at mouth of Butte Slough in 1936. Pumping plants on Sutter Bypass were completed in 1944. Work items with reference to clearing, snagging, rectification of channels, and bank protection on Sacramento River and tributaries in Tehama County and from Red Bluff southerly, provided for by 1941 Flood Control Act were accomplished in fiscal years 1947, 1948, 1949, and 1951. Work remaining comprises completion of levee stage construction, Yolo Bypass and Cache Slough. (See table 44-C for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1981.) 44-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 TABLE 44-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Project 1. Regulation of Hydraulic Mining and Preparation of Plans 2. Sacramento River and Tributaries, Calif. (I)Debris Control) (Contributed Funds, Other)" 3. Treatment of Yuba River Debris Situation Restraining Barriers, Calif. (Federal Funds) (Required Contributed Fund(s) (Contributed Funds, Other)x 4. Sacramento River, Calif. (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) Funding Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost Rehab. Contrib. -Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost Total Cost to FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 Sept 30, 1981 821,325 821,325 313,530 304,953 11,000 1 6,000 20,122 30,000 19,464 281,353 377,990 47! 285,586 324,835 51 1,420 - 12,419 - -15,202 1,255 1,245 50,000 25,000 31,407 67,981 2,316- -- 10 10 - 5,043,999' 2 - 5,043,999' ; 9,000 3,865,0434 1,710 3,830,586 - 12;420 - 312,420 - 361,482 - 361,482 6,000 1,569,6567 5,806 1,569,462' - 1,053,904 - 1.053.904 - - 361,777 - - 361,777 - - 1,585,223 -8 807 1,562,829 - - 1,053,904 - - 1,053,904 - - 34,000 - - 34,000 65,000 10,000 67,626,335" 20,491 68,911 67,620,823" - - 1,979,104 - - 1,979,104 - - 10,724,085s" - - 10,724,0851" - - 9,686" - - 9,686" 1. Exclusive of $644,503 appropriation and cost on inactive portion of project. 2. Includes $397,127 for recreational facilities at North Fork ($32,473) and Harry L. Englebright ($364,654), Code 710 appropriations. 3. Includes $397,127 for recreational facilities at North Fork ($32,473) and Harry L. Englebright ($364,654), Code 710 costs. 4. Includes $2,976,961 from regular funds and $888,082 from Hydraulic Mining in California funds. 5. Includes $2,942,504 from regular costs and $888,082 from Hydraulic Mining in California costs. 6. Funds from State of California Department of Navigation and Ocean Development for acquisition of a boarding float at Englebright Dam. 7. Includes deferred maintenance funds in amount of $207,500. 8. Miscellaneous engineering and construction accomplished at expense of local interests in connection with rehabilitation of Daguerre Point Dam necessitated by December 1964 floodflows. 9. Includes appropriation and cost of $680,000 for new work for previous project and $1,486,469 public works funds for new work for existing project. 10. Includes $680,000 required contribution for previous project; $4,939,752 required contributed funds for existing project; and $310,801 voluntary contribution for bank protection for existing project. 11. Includes $9,686 required contributed funds for existing project. 44-4 TABLE 44-B CALIFORNIA DEBRIS COMMISSION AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 1. 1893 Feb. 27. 1907 .June 19, 1934 .Jul ne 25. 1938 Ex. Doc. 267, 51st Cong., 2d sess., Ex. Doc. 98, 47th Cong., 1st sess.1 (Amendment of sec. 13, Act of Mar. 1, 1893.)' REGULATION OF HYDRAULIC MINING AND PREPARATION OF PLANS (See Section 1 of Text) Created California Debris Commission and authorized: (a) Hydraulic mining under its regulation in drainage areas of Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers, if possible without injury to navigability of these river systems or to lands adjacent thereto; and (b) preparation of plans by Commission for improvement of navigability of these river systems, and flood and debris-control therein. Authorized California Debris Commission to permit hydraulic mining without construction of impounding works, provided there is no injury to navigability of above river systems or lands adjacent thereto. Amended act of Mar. 1, 1893, which provides for construction of debris dams or other restraining works by California Debris Commission and collection of a 3-percent tax on gross proceeds of each mine using such facilities, so as to eliminate this tax and substitute an annual tax per cubic yard mined, obtained by dividing total capital cost of each dam, reservoir, and rights-of-way, by total capacity of reservoir for restraint of debris; and authorized revocation of Commission orders permitting such mining, for failure to pay this annual tax within 30 days after its due date; and also authorized receipt of money advances, from mineowners to aid such construction, to be refunded later from annual payments of yardage taxes on material mined. Added at end of sec. 23 of above act, a provision that the Secretary of the Army is authorized to enter into contracts to supply storage for water and use of outlet facilities from debris-storage reservoirs for domestic and irrigation purposes and power development, upon such conditions of delivery, use, and payment as he may approve, these payments are to be deposited to credit of such reservoir project, reducing its capital cost to be repaid by tax on mining operations. SACRAMENTO RIVER, CALIF. (See Section 4 of Text) Additional levee construction and reconstruction, including levee protection of Upper Butte Basin, and multipurpose reservoirs." Bank protection and incidental channel improvements, Sacramento River from Chico Landing to Red Bluff, and local interests flood plain zoning above Chico Landing.2 Bank protection works at critical locations, Sacramento River.2 1. For latest published map, see Annual Report for 1913, 2. This supplemental work is reported in detail under p. 3170, and Rivers and Harbors Committee Document 50, Sacramento District, Improvement No. 19. 74th Cong., 1st sess. 44-5 H. Does. 649, 78th Cong., 2d sess., and 367, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 272, 84th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 103, 86th Cong., 2d sess. l)ec. 22, 1944 and May 17, 195() .Iuly :, 1958 .July 11, 19G0 TABLE 44-C REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 SACRAMENTO RIVER, CALIF.: TOTAL COST OF EXISTING PROJECT TO SEPTEMBER 30,. 1981 (See Section 4 of Text) Funds New Work Maintenance Total Regular $65,454,354 $1,979,104 $67,433,458' Public Works 1,486,469 - 1,486,469 Total U.S. $66,940,823 $1,979,104 $68,919,927 Contributed Project Work 4,939,752 9,686 4,949,438 Contribute(l, Other 5,104,333 - 5,104,333 Total All Funds $76,984,908 $1,988,790 $78,973,698 1. includes $429,671 representing book value of plant P)urchased( with previous project funds and transferred to existing project without reimbursement. 44-6 U. S. ARMY ENGINEER WATERWAYS EXPERIMENT STATION Organization and functions. The Waterways Experiment Station (WES) is a field operating agency of the Chief of Engineers operating under the staff supervision of the Director, Research and Development. COL Tilford C. Creel, Corps of Engineers, is Commander and Director. WES, the Corps of Engineers largest laboratory complex for research, testing, and development, consists of four technical laboratories: Hydraulics, Geotechnical, Structures, and Environmental. The Hydraulics Laboratory, the largest laboratory of its kind in the world, uses a wide range of working models and computer-based numerical models for research and analysis of dams, levees, rivers, and harbor projects, soil and streambank erosion, thermal pollution, etc. The Geotechnical Laboratory conducts research in soil mechanics, structural foundation design, embankment design and slope stability, seepage analysis, military pavements, engineering geology, rock mechanics, expedient surfacing, earthquake engineering, and mobility and trafficability. The Structures Laboratory uses theoretical, analytical, experimental, and modeling approaches to research the effects of nuclear and nonnuclear explosions, the response of structures to natural and explosive disturbances, and various construction materials with emphasis on concrete, especially the testing, repair, and preservation of existing concrete structures. The Environmental Laboratory researches the problems caused by man's activities with respect to the environment. Research programs include Dredged Material, Aquatic Plant Control, Environmental and Water Quality Operational Studies, Environmental Impact, Wetlands, and the Recreation Research Program. These and other programs of the Environmental Laboratory range through waste management, environmental regulations, and military aspects of terrain and camouflage. WES Laboratories are engaged in research and engineering investigations in support .of the civil and military missions of the Chief of Engineers. On a reimbursable basis, WES performs basic and applied research, develops state of the art methods and techniques, tests materials and equipment, and provides consulting services. Subject to the approval of the Chief of Engineers, studies and investigations may be undertaken for agencies outside the Department of the Army. WES maintains an extensive scientific and engineering reference library to serve the specialized needs of the Corps of Engineers and issues publications of general interest, operates DOD Information Analysis Centers in the fields of Pavements and Soils Trafficability, Concrete Technology, Hydraulic Engineering, and Soils Mechanics; and maintains the Corps of Engineers Engineering Computer Programs Library. During Fiscal Year 1981, 216 WES numbered reports of individual studies conducted at or for WES, 27 contract translations, and 58 unnumbered publications (conference reports, special study reports, etc.) for WES and other offices were printed and distributed to Corps offices and interested outside agencies. Operations and results during the period. Work accomplished at WES is, in general, initially financed by the Corps of Engineers Revolving Fund, with direct reimbursement from agencies requesting research investigations and related services. The Station's total program during Fiscal Year 1981 was $66,887,109 which included $10,487,751 performed by contract. Of the reimbursable work $35,992,349 was charged to civil funds, $30,715,178 was charged to military funds, and $179,582 to non-Governmental concerns. The plant replacement and improvement program was $3,744,418 for this period. 45-1 PERMANENT INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF NAVIGATION CONGRESSES (PIANC) The Permanent International Association of Navigation Congresses (PIANC) is an international organization with headquarters in Brussels, Belgium. It is a clearinghouse where the views and experiences of engineers and port operators of the nations of the world are exchanged on problems relating to ocean and inland navigation improvements. Its objective is broadly stated "to promote the progress of inland and maritime navigation." The Association developed during the period 1885-1902 from an international interest in perpetuating a series of Congresses for the exchange of technical information on problems related to inland and ocean navigation. The Permanent International Commission was formed during the 8th International Congress at Paris in 1900 and led to the formation of PIANC during the 9th International Congress at Dusseldorf, Germany in 1902. The United States became a member nation by authority of an Act of Congress approved June 28, 1902, which provided for annual appropriations toward the maintenance of the Association. In 1902, the United States appropriated $3,000 annually for support and maintenance of the Permanent International Commission of Congresses of Navigation and for payment of the actual expenses of properly acquired national delegates to the United States to meetings of the Congresses and Commissions. An increase in the appropriation to $5,000 annually was authorized by the 1948 River and Harbor Act and an appropriation to $22,000 annually by the 1965 River and Harbor Act. The current appropriation of $45,000 was authorized by the 1974 Water Resources Development Act. Of this amount, an annual subvention of about $6,000 is paid by the U.S. Section to the International Association in Brussels, Belgium. The objective of the Association - to promote the progress of inland and maritime navigation- is met by holding International Congresses and publishing technical bulletins and other documents. The Congresses are held in various member countries, usually at four-year intervals. The Association is supported principally by member governments, but membership also extends to corporations and to individuals. Member governments are represented at the Congresses and at meetings of the Permanent International Commission by delegates, the number of official delegates to be determined by the amount of the annual subsidy paid by the government, but not to exceed ten in number. Corporate members may send one official representative to the Congresses. Currently, the Permanent International Commission has 40 countries represented. Individual membership is of two classes-Annual and Life-depending on the method of payment of dues. There are currently 1,252 annual international members, 718 life members, and 671 corporate members, for a total of 2,641 members. Membership of the U.S. Section on September 30, 1981, totaled 645, consisting of 126 life members, 445 individual members, and 74 corporate members. Sixty-two new individual members and 9 corporate members were added to the U.S. Section during the calendar year; 41 individual members and 5 corporate members were deleted either through resignations, death, or non-payment of dues. The affairs of the Association are managed by the Permanent International Commission composed of delegates from the supporting governments. The National Commission constitutes the governing body of the U.S. Section and the U.S. members of the Permanent International Commission. The Director of Civil Works, Office of the Chief of Engineers, U.S. Army, and the Resident Member, Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors are the ex-officio Chairman and Secretary, respectively, of the National Commission. The Secretary handles all administrative matters of the U.S. Section. During Fiscal Year 1981, National Commissioners were: Major General E.R. Heiberg III, USA, ex-officio Chairman; Colonel Albert C. Costanzo, CE, ex-officio Secretary, who retired June 30, 1981, and was replaced by Colonel F.W. Meuller, Jr., CE; Rear Admiral Richard A. Bauman, USCG; Mr. Harry N. Cook; Mr. James M. Goldston; Colonel Herbert T. Haar, Jr., USA (Ret); Rear Admiral Donald G. Iselin, USN, who retired February 15, 1981; Mr. Vernon J. Ljungren; and Mr. William R. Murden. Admiral Iselin and Mr. John J. Nachtsheim, who retired in December 1980, were replaced by Mr. John W. Hernandez, Jr., and Mr. George H. Kimmons. Lieutenant General John W. Morris, USA (Ret) is an honorary Vice President of PIANC, having served two terms as a Vice President. Major General Charles G. Holle, USA (Ret), Secretary-General, XXth International Navigation Congress, 1961, is ex-officio member of the Permanent International Commission. Honorary American members of the Permanent International Commission include the late Mr. Carl B. Jansen; Brigadier General Herbert D. Vogel, USA (Ret); and Colonel Alvin D. Wilder, USA (Ret). The annual meeting of the Permanent International Commission (PIC) was held in Edinburgh, Scotland on May 9, 1981, and was attended by seven National Commissioners and one alternate. Lieutenant General John W. Morris, USA (Ret); Major General Charles G. Holle, USA (Ret); and Brigadier General Herbert D. Vogel, USA (Ret) also attended the PIC meeting. The XXVth International Navigation Congress was held May 10-16, 1981, in Edinburgh, Scotland. There were over 1,000 Congress participants including 55 persons from the United States. There were 125 papers presented on ten subjects covering Inland Waterways and Ports and Maritime Ports and Seaways. American representatives attended meetings of International Study Commissions during the fiscal year. Mr. John Davis attended one meeting of the Commission for the Study of Locks, Ship Lifts, and River Weirs. Brigadier General Herbert D. Vogel, USA (Ret) attended two meetings of the Permanent Committee for Developing Countries (PCDC). Mr. J.W. Hershey represented the U.S. Section at the meeting of PTC No. 2. Mr. John Nichol represented the U. S. Section on the Sport and Pleasure Navigation Commission; Mr. Dennis Padron represented the U.S. Section on the Fender Design Commission. Mr. Alf H. Sorensen represented the U.S. Section at PTC I Working Group on Disposal of Dredged Materials meetings. 46-1 INVESTIGATIONS OF PROJECTS UNDER THE FEDERAL POWER ACT The Federal Water Power Act of June 10, 1920, created the Federal Power Commission (in 1977 renamed Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, FERC) composed of the Secretaries of War, Interior, and Agriculture, with authority to grant permits and licenses for hydroelectric development in all waters over which Congress has jurisdiction. The act further required that work of the commission be performed by and through the Departments of War, Interior and Agriculture and their engineering, technical, and other personnel except as may be otherwise provided by law. By an act of June 23, 1930, entitled "An Act to Reorganize the Federal Power Commission," Secs. 1 and 2 of the Federal Water Power Act of 1920 were amended. A commission was provided for, to be composed of five commissioners to be appointed by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate. The necessity of performing work through the Departments of War, Interior, and Agriculture was removed and the commission was authorized to appoint such officers and employees as necessary in executing its function. By Title II, Public Utility Act of 1935, the original Federal Water Power Act was made Part I of the Federal Power Act, and Parts II and III were added to that act. On October 1, 1977, pursuant to the provisions of the Department of Energy Organization Act (DOE Act), Public Law 59-91 Stat. 565 (August 4, 1977) and Executive Order No. 12009, 42 Fed. Reg. 46267 (September 15, 1977), the Federal Power Commission ceased to exist and its functions and regulatory responsibilities were transferred to the Secretary and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) which, as an independent commission within the Department of Energy was activated on October 1, 1977. Section 4(e) of the Federal Power Act provides that no water power license affecting navigable capacity of any nayigable capacity of any navigable waters of the United States shall be issued until plans of the dam or other structures affecting navigation have been approved by the Chief of Engineers and the Secretary of Army. By an action, notice of which was published in the Federal Register Volume 40, Number 74, dated April 16, 1975, the Secretary of the Army delegated to the Chief of Engineers his authority under Sec. 4(e) of the Federal Power Act. The Chief of Engineers on September 5, 1980, delegated to the Corps division engineers the authority for Section 4(e) approval of plans for non- Federal hydropower development affecting navigation. The following work of an engineering nature was accomplished by the Corps division and district offices under the direction of the Chief of Engineers during the fiscal year: 1,647 applications from non-Federal entities for planning, design, construction and operation of hydropower projects were reviewed and appropriate recommendations in the interest of flood control and navigation were furnished to the Commission. Of the total 1,647 applications, 379 applications were for hydropower development at Corps projects. Recommendations were furnished to the Commission concerning the impact of licensed projects on the existing and proposed Federal water resources projects. Recommendations also were provided to the Commission about the environmental impacts of proposed and existing licensed projects. 'Ib date there are 23 constructed non-Federal power plants at Corps projects. Non-Federal entities had three power plants under active construction at Corps projects during the fiscal year. In 1981 arrangements were made with FERC for the Corps to bill FERC licensees for the costs incurred by the Corps in approving final design, plans, and construction of power plants at Corps projects. Reimbursements are made by the licensees to the United States Treasury. 47-1 REGULATORY AND SUNKEN VESSEL REMOVAL ACTIVITIES 1. REGULATORY ACTIVITIES Authorities. Regulatory activities of the Corps of Engineers, primarily processing applications for permits are conducted under the following authorities: Sections 9 and 10 (structures in and alterations of waterways, e.g., boatdocks) of the River & Harbor Act of 1899; Section 103 (ocean dumping) of the Marine Protection, Research & Sanctuaries Act of 1982; and Section 404 (discharge of dredged and fill material) of the Clean Water Act. Work Completed. During FY 81, 18,714 applications for individual permits were received and 15,905 permits and letters of permission were issued. A total of 377 permits were denied; thousands of other permits which might have been denied were modified or conditioned to allow issuance. In addition, about 350 regional permits were in effect around the country by the end of FY 81. These permits, which eliminated the requirement for making application to the Corps, authorized thousands of activities without the wait for a formal permit. The Corps also investigated 5,267 alleged violations, held 277 public meetings, and 133 public hearings on specific applications. A total of 10 draft EIS's were filled, and 12 final EIS's were filed. In other activities, significant actions were taken toward streamlining the regulatory program during FY 81. The Corps continued work on revising its permit regulations, collecting and considering comments from all over the nation. Two national public hearings were held on proposed revisions. In response to the President's Task Force on Regulatory Reform, a joint Army/OMB review began an intensive study of the regulatory program to identify needed improvements. The Army/OMB recommendations were to be announced in early 1982. For obligations and expenditures see Table 48-A. TABLE 48-A GENERAL REGULATORY FUNCTIONS Obligations Unobligated Balance-30 Sep 80 .......... $ 1,320,778 Allotments ................................ +43,954,756 Total Funds Available .................. $ 45,275,534 Obligations .............................. -43,376,836 Unobligated Balance 30 Sep 81 ............ 1,898,698 Expenditures Unexpended Balance-30 Sept 80 ......... $ 2,072,877 Allotments ................................ +45,275,534 Total Funds Available .................. $ 47,348,411 Expenditures ............................. -43,222,897 Unexpended Balance-30 Sep 81 .......... $ 4,125,514 2. INVESTIGATION AND REMOVAL OF SUNKEN VESSELS Under authority of Sections 19 and 20 of the River and Harbor Act of 1899, the Corps of Engineers investigated sunken vessels in navigable waters and removed those which obstructed navigation. For obligations and expenditures see Table 48-B. TABLE 48-B REMOVAL OF SUNKEN VESSELS Obligations Unobligated Balance-30 Sep 80 ............. $ 198,657 Allotments ................................... +656,723 Total Funds Available ..................... 855,380 Obligations 755,976 Unobligated Balance-30 Sep 81 ............. 99,404 Expenditures Unexpended Balance-30 Sep 80 .............. $ 222,107 Allotments .................................. +656,723 Total Funds Available ..................... 878,830 Expenditures ................................ 771,281 Unexpended Balance-30 Sep 81 ............. $ 107,549 48-1 INTERNATIONAL BOUNDARY WATERS BOARDS In order to carry out United States obligations under international agreements, the Office of the Chief of Engineers and several Corps Divisions and Districts with jurisdiction over areas bordering Canada have representation on numerous international boards and committees. The majority of these boards were established by the International Joint Commission (IJC) as empowered in accordance with the provisions of the Boundary Waters Treaty of 1909 between the United States and Great Britain (for Canada). IJC boards fall into two broad categories: boards of control, which are more or less permanent and supervise compliance over an IJC order; and engineering or technical boards, which are usually dissolved after completing and reporting on an investigation assignment. In addition to boards created by the Commission, other international boards and committees are created by treaties or other informal arrangement in matters concerned with the water resources of joint interest, and the members report directly to the Governments or establishing agency. International boundary waters boards and committees having Corps of Engineer memberships during the fiscal year are listed in Table 49-1. For an explanation of the constitution of the various boards and committees, see the FY 77 and FY 80 Annual reports. TABLE 49-1. IJC BOARDS OF CONTROL HAVING CE MEMBERS BOARD NAME YEAR ESTABLISHED 1. Int. Lakes Superior 2. Int. St. Croix River 3. Int. Lake of the Woods 1. Int. Lake Champlain 5. Int. Kootenay Lake 6. Int. Rainy Lake 7. Int. Osoyoos Lake 8. Int. Niagara 9. Int. St. Lawrence River 10. Int. Skagit River 1914 1815 1925 1937 1938 1941 1943 1953 1953 1967 UNITED STATES REPRESENTATION *Div. Engr., NCD *Div. Engr., NED *Dist. Engr., St. Paul *Dist. Engr., New York *1. Dist. Engr. Seattle 2. Dept. of Interior, USGS, Boise, ID *Dist. Engr. St. Paul 1. Dist. Engr. Seattle *2. Dept. of Interior, USGS, Tacoma WA 3. Washington Dept. of Ecology, Olympia *1. Div. Engr. NCD 2. Dept. of Energy, FERC, Washington, D.C. *1. Div. Engr. NCD 2. St. Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation, Asst. Admin., Massena, NY 3. Dept. of Energy, FERC, Washington, D.C. 4. NY State Power Authority, Massena, NY *Dist. Engr. Seattle IJC ENGINEERING OR STUDY BOARDS HAVING CE MEMBERS BOARD NAME YEAR ESTABLISHED 11. Int. Souris-Red Rivers Engineering 12. Int. Champlain-Richelieu 13. Int. Lake Erie Regulation Study 14. Int. Great Lakes Diversions and Consumptive Uses Study 15. Int. Great Lakes Technical Information Network Board 1948 1975 1977 1977 1979 UNITED STATES REPRESENTATION 1. Dist. Engr. St. Paul *2. Dept. of Interior, WPRS, Washington, D.C. 3. Dept. of Interior, USGS, Washington, D.C. *1. New York Depart. Envir. Conser. 2& Dist. Engr., New York 3. Vermont Agency Envir. Conser. 4. New England River Basins Commission, Staff Associate 5. Dept. of Interior, F&WS, Boston, MA *1. Div. Engr. NCD 2. Ohio Dept. Nat. Res. 3. New York Dept. Envir. Conser. 4. Dept. of Interior, F&WS, Washington, D.C. *1. Div. Engr. NCD 2. Michigan Dept. Nat. Res. 3. Illinois Dept. of Trans. 4. Pennsylvania Dept. of Envir. Res. 5. Dept. of Energy, FERC, New York, NY *1. NCEED-L, Detroit, MI 2. Great Lakes Environmental Research Lab. NOAA, Ann Arbor, MI 3. USGS, Reston, VA 49-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS U.S. ARMY 1981 OTHER INTERNATIONAL BOARDS OR GROUPS HAVING CE MEMBERS 18. Int. Lake Memphremagog 17. Coordinating Committee on Great Lakes Basic Hydraulic and Hydrologic Data 18. Int. Niagara Committee 19. Columbia River Treaty Entities 20. Columbia River Treaty Permanent Engineering *Signifies U.S. Section Chairman. 1920 1953 1955 1964 1964 *Dist. Engr. New York *1. Eng. Div. North Central Div. 2. Dept. of Commerce, NOAA, Rockville, MD *Div. Engr. NCD 1. Div. Engr. NPD *2. Bonneville Power Admin. Portland, OR *1. OCE, DAEN-CWE, Washington, D.C. 2. Dept. of Energy, Washington, D.C. 49-2 U.S. ARMY CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING RESEARCH LABORATORY Organization and functions. The U. S. Army Construction Engineering Research Laboratory (CERL) is a field operating agency of the Chief of Engineers operating under the supervision of the Chief, Research and Development Office, CERL, which is located in Champaign, IL, was officially dedicated on July 25, 1969, and is one of the Corps' five major laboratories. The laboratory is closely affiliated with the University of Illinois, sharing laboratory, library, computer, and personnel resources with the University. Colonel Louis J. Cicero, Corps of Engineers, is Commander and Director. CERL research programs are oriented toward the support of the total Army, the Army in garrison, the military installation, the Department of Defense, and to the nation as a whole. The laboratory, which has base support, combat support, and civil works missions, is engaged in a construction research program designed to improve planning, design, construction, operation, and maintenance of a variety of Army facilities. The ultimate goal of the overall research effort is to create products that will save the Army resources. Research findings are transmitted directly to the field, as well as to private industry and the academic community. Within the Corps, research supports both military and civil works projects in the general areas of environmental quality, energy, materials, engineering management, and military engineering. In the area of environmental quality, CERL has developed a broad-based program designed to maintain military readiness standards, while still conforming to environmental quality regulations. These programs have included development of methods to predict noise impacts, water and air pollution control techniques, adaptations of currently used technologies to more stringent fluid and solid waste control, and computerized methods to cut the time and costs involved in environmental impact assessment. Energy research is oriented toward helping the Army meet its energy conservation goals. These projects include development of computer simulation technology for selection of more fuel-efficient energy systems and design methods and exploration of alternative fuel sources like solar energy and biomass. CERL's materials program is designed to lower the Army's costs for construction, modification, operation, and maintenance of its facilities. These projects include investigations on protective coatings, polymer technology, seismic criteria, quality monitoring systems, and materials syntheses and selection programs. CERL supports the Army decision-maker through its engineering management programs that are designed to increase facility efficiency and productivity. The development of automated data processing systems for management information, cost estimating, profit determination, architecture and design, corrosion mitigation, pavement management, housing contract maintenance, and habitability information have helped reduce costs throughout the military. CERL's military engineering program provides direct support to the battlefield engineer and to the maintenance of military readiness. This research has developed training aids, field-protective structures to increase combat survivability, and methods to enhance the effectiveness of operation during combat situations. During Fiscal Year 1981, CERL produced 98 publications, of which 40 were technical reports, 28 were Army-level publications, and 30 were publications presented in the public domain. In addition, CERL personnel presented 38 papers at scientific meetings. CERL personnel prepared and presented 28 training programs in areas such as corrosion, automated specification editing, and energy conservation. Operations and results during the period. Work performed during Fiscal Year 1981 was funded both directly and through reimbursable programs. CERL's total program was $18.619 million, of which $8.095 million was direct RDT&E funding and $7.524 million was reimbursable funding from the Office of the Chief of Engineers and Corps Divisions and Districts. Other Federal agencies, such as the Air Force, Navy, Department of Energy, and Environmental Protection Agency accounted for $3.0 million. 50-1 U.S. ARMY ENGINEER TOPOGRAPHIC LABORATORIES Organization and functions. The U.S. Army Engineer Topographic Laboratories (ETL) began during World War I as a temporary Engineer Detachment, formed to test aerial photography for topographic mapping. Since that time, ETL has grown into a sophisticated, modern research and development laboratory, applying the latest advances in optics, electronics, computer data processing, space sciences, and related technologies to military and civil problems in mapping, surveying, land navigation, and geodesy. ETL is now a field operating agency of the Corps of Engineers and is commanded by Colonel Edward K. Wintz. The Engineer Topographic Laboratories is the only defense research and development laboratory that addresses the full range of development from basic research to a final product in the topographic sciences. Support is provided to both the Military and Civil Works elements of the Corps and DARCOM and DMA, including the Army Materiel Development and Readiness Command and the Defense Mapping Agency. To provide this support, ETL is organized into five operational elements, three of which are developmental laboratories. The Geographic Sciences Laboratory performs research and development associated with the extraction and presentation of geographic data for the Army in the field. The bpographic Development Laboratory supports technological development in surveying and mapmaking. The Computer Sciences Laboratory develops advanced computer techniques and systems for processing, analyzing, and displaying topographic data derived from digital photography. The Research Institute performs most of the Laboratories' basic and applied research, and the Terrain Analysis Center prepares terrain studies needed by field Army elements, as directed by the Assistant Chief of Staff of the Army for Intelligence. During Fiscal Year 1981 copies of 29 Engineer Topographic Laboratories numbered reports of individual studies conducted at or for the Engineer Topographic Laboratories were distributed to Corps' offices and interested outside agencies. ETL is the principal Corps of Engineers laboratory for remote sensing. Nearly every aspect of the work done at ETL involves this technology. Research Institute personnel are investigating the types of data derived from sensors and means for expoliting those data. Central to this work are studies regarding the possibilities of automating image interpretation. The Computer Sciences Laboratory staff is investigating the digital processing of remote sensing data. Geographic Sciences Laboratory members have defined remote sensing inputs required for Army terrain graphics and terrain data bases. In addition, a remote sensing consultant conducts short courses on remote sensing for Corps of Engineers and other government personnel. Finally, ETL also assists the Corps of Engineers Civil Works Directorate with remote sensing information relating to inland waterways, water resources, and flood control. Operations & results during FY 81. The Engineer Topographic Laboratories' total program for FY 81 was $30,669,000. This included work done for other agencies as well as for the Corps of Engineers. $17,850,000 of this program supported work performed by contract. Reimburseable work in FY 81 included $213,000 charged to civil works funds and $3,000 to non-governmental concerns. 51-1 U.S. ARMY COLD REGIONS RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING LABORATORY The establishment of USACRREL in Hanover, New Hampshire in 1961 brought together several cold regions research and engineering programs which began in the 1940's. American involvement in World War II underscored the need for air bases in Alaska, Greenland and Iceland, areas where the ground freezes in the winter or remains frozen all year. Construction on such soil (and on permanent ice fields) presents very difficult engineering problems. The first government laboratory set up to study cold regions engineering problems was the Frost Effects Laboratory in Boston, Massachusetts, established in 1944. In 1945 the St. Paul (Minnesota) District of the Corps of Engineers set up a Permafrost Division to develop methods for constructing airfields on permanently frozen ground. The Permafrost Division conducted field tests at its Alaska Field Station in Fairbanks. During this time the Permafrost Division pioneered the use of aerial reconnaissance photography for airfield site selection. In 1949 the Department of Defense created the Snow, Ice and Permafrost Research Establishment (SPIRE) for the purpose of coordinating and conducting basic research in the fields of snow, ice, and frozen ground either on or beneath the earth's surface. SPIRE was located first in the St. Paul District, but moved in 1951 to laboratory facilities at Wilmette, Illinois. In 1954 SIPRE established the Keweenaw Field Station in Houghton, Michigan, to carry out field experiments of theories developed in the laboratory. In 1956 SIPRE's Photographic Interpretation and Research Branch began making major advancements in the use of aerial photography to gather basic engineering data in cold regions. In 1953 the Corps of Engineers transferred the Permafrost Division of the St. Paul District to Boston where it was combined with New England's Frost Effects Laboratory. The new organization was called the Arctic Construction and Frost Effects Laboratory (ACFEL). Finally, in January 1961, OCE General Order #3 created the U.S. Army Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory by merging SIPRE and ACFEL. The new organization is located in Hanover, New Hampshire. The Laboratory's mission is: to conduct and coordinate research and surveillance of technology applicable to the Army's needs in those geographic areas of the world where cold presents a severe problem at least one year in ten. The total authorized strength of the laboratory is 266 civilians and 14 military personnel, with funding for FY 81 at $14,687,000. USACRREL has five main buildings in Hanover totalling 240,000 square feet on 24 acres. The laboratory also maintains an Alaskan Projects Office in Fairbanks, which manages a unique permafrost tunnel, a 360-foot shaft drilled into frozen soil. The tunnel serves as the site for numerous field studies on permafrost. USACRREL's basic and applied research covers a broad spectrum of cold regions studies. Basic research includes work in the physical, mechanical, and chemical properties of snow and other forms of frozen precipitation, fresh water ice, sea ice, and frozen ground. Basic research supports applied research construction, transportation, and other problems encountered in arctic, subarctic, and temperate cold regions. Major cold regions research topics include: ice engineering, energy conservation, environmental impact and preservation, roads and airfields, off-road mobility problems, control of snow and ice, and wastewater management. As the only federal laboratory dedicated to cold regions research, USACRREL has a national reputation and maintains close ties with federal and state agencies, consulting as needed on a reimbursable basis. As the center of cold regions scientific and engineering expertise for the Corps of Engineers, USACRREL supports Corps districts and divisions by publishing field engineering reports, by sponsoring technical seminars for field engineers, and by making visits to consult on engineering problems. 'Operations and Results During FY81 During FY81, USACRREL published and distributed 213 scientific and engineering reports*, contributed to 40 U.S. Army publications, and sponsored 14 technical seminars and meetings. Also during FY81 USACRREL managed the technical revision of the federal manual, Land Treatment of Municipal Wastewater (EM 1110-1-501). The Ice Engineering Program published the initial draft of the Corps' Ice Engineering Manual, the first of its kind. A physical model of a four-mile stretch of an ice-prone river in Vermont was constructed inside the refrigerated ice engineering facility for the purpose of studying the formation of ice jams. The work will lead to more effective ways to deal with ice jams wherever they occur. The laboratory is working with the Alaska District monitoring the effects on the Tanana River of the construction of a major flood control project to protect the city of Fairbanks *CRREL Reports, Special Reports, Technical Notes, internal reports, journal articles, conference papers, and translations. 52-1 U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS WATER RESOURCES SUPPORT CENTER The Water Resources Support Center, under the staff supervision of the Director of Civil Works, Office of the Chief of Engineers, is commanded by Colonel Maximilian Imhoff. The Center is located at Fort Belvoir, Virginia. Its divisions are the Institute for Water Resources, Dredging Division, Data Collection and Management Division, the Publications and Training Division, and the Office of Administrative Services. Elements managed by the Center in other locations include the Hydrologic Engineering Center at Davis, California, the Marine Design Branch of the Dredging Division at Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and the Waterborne Commerce Statistics Center of the Data Collection and Management Division at New Orleans, Louisiana. The accomplishments of the WRSC divisions during 1981 are listed by division. DATA COLLECTION AND MANAGEMENT DIVISION The National Dam Inspection Act The National Dam Inspection Act, Public Law 92-367, gave the Corps the responsibility for the inventory and inspection of non-Federal dams meeting specified minimum size requirements nationwide. The original inventory compiled in 1975 contained approximately 49,000 dams. Field investigations and the use of satellite imagery have brought this figure to its current total of 68,102 dams (4,725 of which do not meet the size requirements of Public Law 92-367). Inspection of 8,814 non-Federal dams was completed in 1981 and inspection reports were furnished to state governors and dam owners. State personnel were provided training to assist them in setting up effective state dam safety programs. Of the dams inspected, 2,296 were found to have deficiencies which rendered them unsafe. The Corps recommended emergency action for 135 of the unsafe dams to eliminate the possibility of imminent failure. The Water Resources Data Center Several years of project planning and design culminated with the opening of the Water Resources Data Center (WRDC) located at the Corps' headquarters in Washington, D.C. This multi-purpose facility was designed to support the Office of the Chief of Engineers, the Director of Civil Works, and the field divisions of the Corps with centralized access to projects and program performance information. The impetus for the WRDC came after the floods of 1973 showed a need for engineers in one division to have immediate access to weather, flooding and similar data from other divisions. The WRDC enables the Corps to respond to inquiries through queries to any or all of its 11 data bases. The system's communications equipment allows Corps district and division offices to input and receive data directly from the WRDC. The center also includes a conference and briefing area allowing members of Congress, the press, and others to receive up-to-the-minute information in emergencies, as well as permitting Corps field offices to brief the headquarters staff electronically. The Remote Sensing Research Program Technical monitoring of the Remote Sensing Research Program continued in FY 81. Remote sensing technology initiated integration with the Spatial Analysis Methodology Demonstration Program and a Memorandum of Understanding between the Corps and NASA to conduct a cooperative program of technology assessment and transfer. The remote sensing research program was reviewed by the National Research Council, Academy of Engineers, and a report was provided which will assist in future program planning. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers-sponsored Remote Sensing Symposium for 30 November-2 December 1981 in Nashville, Tennessee, was organized. The Corps increased its use of Data Collection Platforms (DCPs) in 1981. Two hundred forty nine radio frequency authorizations were issued for operation of DCPs in 1981; the Corps has tripled the number of DCPs in the last 2 years. The Waterborne Commerce Statistics Center In FY 81 the Waterborne Commerce Statistics Center (WCSC) took major steps to improve the collection and processing of waterborne commerce data. In order to improve the timeliness and availability of the data, WCSC purchased a Systems Engineering Laboratories 32/27 minicomputer system. The new computer system will be designed to produce a waterborne commerce data base that can be queried by remote computer terminals using a data base management system. It will provide quarterly data 120 days after the close of the quarter. The new system should be fully operational in mid-1983. In order to reduce operating expenses, WCSC has implemented a sampling procedure to reduce coding and keypunching costs. Vessel operation reports containing only light trips (i.e., barges without cargo and towboat trips) are modified such that only half of the lines are coded and keypunched. This limited sampling saves the Federal Government approximately $40 thousand per year, yet results in less than one percent degradation in the accuracy of the published trip tables. This sampling procedure has no effect on accuracy of monitoring on cargo movements. To reduce the paperwork burden on the vessel-operating companies WCSC is accepting computer printouts from the companies instead of government forms filled out by hand. WCSC is currently investigating machine readable vessel movement information from vessel-operating companies to further reduce paperwork and further reduce WCSC's coding and keypunching costs. Port Facilities Branch The Port Facilities Branch collects and publishes data on the physical characteristics of the coastal and Great Lakes ports in the United States. Forty-five port series reports are published at intervals of approximately 11 years, covering approximately 120 seaports and lake ports. During FY 81, nine revised reports covering 34 port areas were published and offered for sale: No. 11-Hampton Roads, Virginia No. 12- Wilmington and Morehead City, North Carolina No. 13- Charleston and Georgetown, South Carolina No. 13- Port Arthur, Beaumont, and Orange, Texas No. 22-Port Arthur, Beaumont, and Orange, Texas No. 26- Freeport, Port Lavaca, Port Isabel, and Brownsville, Texas No. 43- Cleveland, Ohio No. 43- Toledo, Ohio No. 48-Ports on Lake Michigan No. 50-Ports of Hawaii Port Series Reports Nos. 20A (Mississippi River ports above and below New Orleans) and 20 (New Orleans, Louisiana) have been completed and sent to the printer. Due to larger sales than anticipated, Port Series Report No. 23 (Galveston and Texas City, Texas) was reprinted. 53-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS U.S. ARMY 1981 DREDGING DIVISION Operation and Results During FY 81 The Corps continued to retire its dredges consistent with the direction in Public Law 95-269. In FY 81 two Corps hopper dredges were retired-- the small-class hopper dredge DAVISON and the medium-class hopper dredge HARDING. The new small-class hopper dredge YAQUINA was placed in service on the West Coast, and construction continued on the medium-class hopper dredge ESSAYONS II and the largeclass hopper dredge WHEELER. The Corps Industry Capability Program (ICP) gives industry the opportunity to compete with Corps dredges for work historically accomplished by Corps dredges. During FY 81, 33 projects were advertised under the ICP. The industry was awarded 23 of these projects amounting to $33 million of the total $49.7 million advertised. As the number of Corps dredges continues to decline to the minimum fleet level, the ICP is being gradually phased out. The Corps spent an estimated $289 million and moved 234 million cubic yards of material in its overall FY 81 maintenance dredging effort throughout the nation. Of this total, 65 percent was performed by dredging contractors. During FY 81, a major dredging effort to respond to emergencies continued on the Cowlitz River as a result of the Mount St. Helens eruption and the closure of Moriches Inlet in New York. Approximately 24 million cubic yards of material was removed at a cost of $46 million. This was in addition to the normal maintenance dredging reported above. THE HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING CENTER The Hydrologic Engineering Center conducted active programs in research, training, and field assistance during FY 81 in hydrologic engineering and planning analyses. Emphasis was placed on consolidation of recent R&D projects into field usable products. Areas of particular technical emphasis included real-time water control, automated flooddamage analysis, and hydrologic and hydrodynamic system analysis. New computer programs were released for Corps and public use for modeling storm runoff, operating of reservoir systems, and inventorying and managing flood damage potential. User documentation and technical guidance were issued for flood-flow frequency analysis, sediment transport modeling, hydrodynamics of two-dimensional flows, routing floods in densely populated floodplains, preparing flood emergency plans, and preparation of water balances for water supply investigations. Twelve formal training courses were conducted for 330 Corps professionals. The general subject areas were flood hydrology, flood control and nonstructural planning, hydroelectric power, and reservoir systems analysis. Several specific workshops in river hydraulics and flood hydrology were held at the request of the district. A number of foreign visitors were hosted for periods ranging up to one week. The Center provided technical consultations to more than a dozen Corps field offices in a variety of topics. About onethird of HEC's FY 81 efforts were devoted to direct assistance to Corps offices in performance of their studies. Examples include data management systems for districts along the Mississippi; planning study management for emergency preparedness planning (Phoenix); system flood control, Passaic (New York) and Upper Clinton (Detroit); and hydropower potential of the Lehigh (Philadelphia). The HEC also provided assistance to the Federal Emergency Management Agency in density floodway analysis and was a major contributor to the Corps' National Hydropower Study. INSTITUTE FOR WATER RESOURCES Organization and Functions The Institute for Water Resources (IWR), established in 1969, carries out a mission which includes developing new planning methodology, conducting policy analyses and managing national planning studies for the Office of the Chief of Engineers (OCE); presenting training programs related to water resources planning; and consulting on water resource planning problems confronting division and district offices. Research During FY 1981, projects focused on social, economic and environmental aspects of water resources planning. Work included a report entitled An Assessment of Municipal and Industrial Water Use Forecasting Approaches, designed for use by district planners involved in water supply and conservation studies; a construction work force survey, an aid in developing employment benefit estimates and conducting community impact assessments, for use in planning for the MX missile system; development of a user manual and computer accessible data base for use in determining locational advantage in the estimation of regional development benefits; determination of indicators of environmental quality contributions of the regulatory program; development of a methodology for forecasting future wildlife habitat conditions; and development of a computer data base and access program of Flood Insurance Claims in determining flood control benefits. Policy Studies The Policy Studies Division provides analysis of critical policy issues to the Director of Civil Works. The Division completed an investigation of procedures for determining Civil Works research and development needs and priorities, designed and conducted five 3-day workshops on water conservation planning procedures, and assisted the U. S. Departments of Transportation and Energy with preparation of an assessment of the national transportation system capability to handle future coal movements. A policy studies report on public use of jetties explored current methods and alternative policies to develop criteria and guidelines for the safe public use of Corps jetties. Another study evaluated problems of storage, curatorship, public access and display of archeological and historic objects recovered as a result of the Corps projects. Navigation Analysis The Navigation Analysis Center was transformed from the Office of the Chief of Engineers to the WRSC and further delegated to the Institute in FY 1980. The Center develops basic data on waterway carriers, all transportation modes and commodity movements which enhance the analytical capability for planning, operating and maintaining the nation's water transportation system, and assists Corps offices and other water resources planners in using the analytical tools which contribute to this capability. Because much of 53-2 WATER RESOURCES SUPPORT CENTER this support addresses economic issues, the Center is a major resource for benefit-cost methodologies and related data bases. The Center is responsible for the inland waterways performance Monitoring System (PMS). The data base gives the Corps a method of monitoring types and amounts of traffic and commodities moving on the inland waterways; of developing standards for various types of locks; and of monitoring weather, lock operation, state of repair and other conditions that could affect traffic. National Studies The National Planning Studies Division is responsible for carrying out the National Waterways Study and National Hydropower Study. Final reports to Congress containing findings and conclusions of both studies are scheduled for completion in FY 1982. The National Waterways Study is the first overall national water transportation study since 1908. The objectives of the study are to define the nation's needs for waterway transportation, to assess the ability of the existing system to meet both current and projected needs, to describe the relationship between the use of waterways for transportation and for other beneficial purposes, and to recommend to Congress alternative waterway improvements adequate to serve the nation's needs. The National Hydropower Study, a response to the national energy crisis of the 1970s, was undertaken to determine the most efficient means for developing the potential hydroelectric power produced by this country's rivers and streams. The study results show that hydropower can significantly enhance the nation's energy-generating capacity. Information developed in the study indicates it will be feasible to double hydropower capacity and to increase energy from hydropower by about 50-60 percent. The study will be the basis of a recommendation to Congress for a national hydroelectric power development program. Waterpower '81 Waterpower '81, an international conference, was jointly sponsored by the Corps of Engineers, Department of Energy, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Department of Agriculture and the Bureau of Reclamation. Held in Washington, the conference was attended by approximately 900 representatives of policymaking, industrial and professional organizations involved in hydropower around the world. Reimbursable consulting projects performed by the Institute included preparation of a Regulatory Impact Statement for the Corps' regulatory functions programs. The impact study includes estimating the cost (those imposed on permit applications and interveners as well as the cost of administrative review) and estimating benefits due to protection of water quality and navigation interests and addressing impacts of alternative regulatory approaches. Other work completed during FY 1981 included studies on flooding problems in Tug Fork, West Virginia; work for the Mobile District on the Tennessee-Tombigbee Navigation Project and hydropower energy information prepared for the United Nations. Training The Institute's training program provides a means for transferring to Corps field offices technical information and state-of-the-art techniques developed by IWR. Training sessions also offer the opportunity for interaction between IWR and Corps field personnel. During FY 1981, approximately 400 Corps employees attended 11 training courses. One new course on the subject of compliance and enforcement aspects of regulatory functions programs was initiated during the year. The courses are proposed by OCE or IWR and the technical content is developed by the IWR staff. 53-3 APPENDIX A :FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1981 Permanent Characteristies Pool of Dam Cal. Year Total (Acreage)1 Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Length Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful Op. i (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) (Feet) ARIZONA Alam Cane Buttes Painted Rock Dreamy Draw Tat Momolikot Whitlow Ranch ARKANSAS Blue Mountain DeQueen Dierks Gillham Millwood Nimrod CALIFORNIA Black Butte Brea Buchanan Dam-H.V. Eastman Lake Carbon Canyon Coyote Valley Farmington Fullerton Hansen Harry L. Englebright Hidden Dam-Hensley Lake Isabella Lopez Martis Creek Merced County Stream Group: Bear Burns Mariposa Owens Mojave River New Hogan North Fork Pine Flat Prado San Antonio Santa Fe Sepulveda Success Terminus Colorado Gila Gila Gila Gila Gila Arkansas Red Red Red Red Arkansas Sacramento Santa Ana San Joaquin Santa Ana Russian San Joaquin Santa Ana Los Angeles Sacramento San Joaquin San Joaquin Los Angeles Sacramento San Joaquin San Joaquin San Joaquin San Joaquin Mojave San Joaquin Sacramento San Joaquin Santa Ana Santa Ana San Gabriel Los Angeles San Joaquin San Joaquin Bill Williams River Wenden Cane Creek Phoenix Gila River Gila Bend Dreamy Draw Phoenix Santa Rosa Wash Casa Grande Queen Creek Superior Petit Jean River Paris Rolling Fork River DeQueen Saline River Dierks Cossatot River Gillham Little River Ashdown Fourche La Fave Riv. Plainview Stony Creek Brea Creek Orland Fullerton Chowchilla River Chowchilla Carbon Canyon Creed Brea East Fork Russian Riv. Ukiah Littlejohn Creed Farmington East Fullerton Creed Fullerton Big Tujunga Wash Los Angeles Yuba River Marysville Fresno River Madera Kern River Bakersfield Pacoima Wash San Fernando Martis Creek Reno Bear Creek Merced Burns Creek Merced Mariposa Creek Merced Owens Creek Merced Mojave Victorsville Valley Calaveras Springs American River Auburn Kings River Piedra Santa Ana River Corona San Antonio Creek Upland San Gabriel River Duarte Los Angeles River Van Nuys Tule River Porterville Kaweah River Visalia San Gabriel River 1968 1979 1959 1973 1974 1960 1947 1977 1975 1975 1966 1942 1,046,310 46,600 2,491,700 317 198,550 35,590 560 NPP NPP NPP NPP NPP FRWX FRX FRWX FRX FWX FX 257,900 2,910 FRWX 136,100 1,680 FSORW 96,800 1,360 FSRAW 221,800 1,370 FSQW 1,854,930 29,200 FSW 336,010 3,550 FSWX 1963 160,000 770 FIRX 1942 4,010 NPP FRX 1975 1961 1959 1952 1941 1940 1941 1975 1953 1954 1971 1954 1950 1948 1949 1971 1963 1939 1954 1941 1956 1948 1941 1960 1961 150,000 6,610 122,500 52,000 760 26,090 69,000 90,000 570,000 440 20,400 7,700 7,000 15,000 3,600 89,670 325,000 14,700 1,000,000 196,240 7,650 32,640 17,400 85,000 150,000 470 NPP 1,700 NPP NPP 120 400 5,000 1,850 NPP 71 FIRW FRX FRX F FRX FRWX DR FIRW FIRW FX FSR NPP F NPP F NPP F NPP F NPP FRWX 715 280 NPP NPP NPP NPP NPP 400 345 FIRX DR FIRX FRX FX FRX FRX FIRX FIRX Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth & Rock Earth & Rock Earth Concrete Earth Earth Earth & Rock Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Concrete Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth & Rock Concrete Concrete Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth A-1 283 975 109 2,275 181 4,780 50 448 75.5 12,500 149 837 115 2,800 160 2,360 153 2,500 160 1,750 88 17,554 97 1,012 156 2,970 87 1,765 205.5 1,800 99 2,610 160 3,500 60 7,800 46 575 97 10,475 280 1,142 163 5,730 185 4,952 50 1,300 113 2,670 92 1,830 55 4,075 88 1,330 75 790M 200 2,200 210 1,960 155 620 429 1,820 106 2,280 160 3,850 92 23,800 57 15,444 142 3,490 250 2,375 APPENDIX A (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1981 Name Whittier Narrows COLORADO Bear Creek Chatfield Cherry Creek John Martin Trinidad CONNECTICUT Black Rock Colebrook River Hancock Brook Hop Brook Mansfield Hollow Northfield Brook Thomaston West Thompson IDAHO Lucky Peak. ILLINOIS Carlyle Farmdaly Fondulac Shelbyville Rend Lake INDIANA Brookville Cagles Mill Cecil M. Harden Huntington Mississinewa Monroe Patoka Salamonie IOWA Coralville Rathbun Red Rock Saylorville .rte. River Basin San Gabriel Missouri Missouri Missouri Arkansas Arkansas Housatonic Connecticut Housatonic Housatonic Thames Thames Housatonic Thames Columbia Upper Miss. Upper Miss. Upper Miss. Upper Miss. Upper Miss. Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Upper Miss. Missouri Upper Miss. Upper Miss. Permanent Pool Total (Acreage)1 Storage or No Project Stream (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions and Rio Hondo Bear Creek South Platte River Cherry Creek Arkansas River Purgatoire River Branch Brook West Branch, Farmington River Hancock Brook Hop Brook Natchaug River Northfield Brook Naugatuck River Quinebaug Boise River Kaskaskia Riv. Farm Creek Fondulac Creek Kaskaskia Riv. Big Muddy Riv. East Fork of Whitewater Riv. Mill Creek Raccoon Creek Wabash River Mississinewa Salt Creek Patoka River Salamonie Iowa River Chariton River Des Moines Riv. Des Moines Riv. NPP FRWX Community in Vicinity El Monte Denver Denver Denver Lamar Trinidad Thomaston Riverton Plymouth Middlebury Willimantic Thomaston Thomaston Thompson Boise Carlyle East Peoria East Peoria Shelbyville Benton Brookville Terre Haute Rockville Huntington Peru Harrodsburt Ellsworth Wabash Iowa City Centerville Des Moines Des Moines 1974 359,600 2,250 1952 228,120 1,400 1960 132,800 1,100 1969 153,100 500 1967 368,400 1,100 1964 441,000 3,280 1978 301,600 2,010 1966 263,600 976 1958 492,000 1,820 1969 552,000 11,000 1969 1,830,000 8,950 1975 602,000 74,000 Cal. Year Placed in Useful Op. 1957 1978 1974 1950 1948 1977 1970 1969 1960 1968 1952 1965 1960 1965 1956 1967 1951 1951 1970 1970 Type Earth Earth Earth Earth Cone. & Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth FRSW Earth & FRX Earth FRX Earth FRW Earth FRW Earth FARS Earth FRSQW Earth & FRW Earth FARW Earth FNRWXQ Earth FARWQ Earth FARWQ Earth A-2 35,150 28,290 235,000 93,920 621,326 158,500 8,700 97,700 4,030 6,970 52,000 2,430 42,000 26,800 306,000 983,000 15,500 3,780 684,000 294,000 Characteristics of Dam Height Length (Feet) (Feet) 56 16,960 170 5,120 148 12,500 141 14,300 Earth 118 13,780 200 6,860 154 933 223 1,300 57 630 97 520 68 12,420 118 810 142 2,000 70 2,550 250 1,700 67 6,570 80 1,275 67 1,000 108 3,000 54 10,600 Rock 182 3,000 150 950 117 1,790 91 5,332 137 8,100 93 1,400 Rock 84 1,550 133 6,100 100 1,400 86 10,600 110 5,676 125 6,750 105 1,479 852 1,678 213 20 760 40 21 450 8 NPP 200 2,850 26,000 NPP NPP 11,100 18,900 FRX FRX FRX FIRXW FIRXW FR FRSX FRW FR FRW FRW F FRW FIR FSNRWA FF FSNRW FQRSW KANSAS Big Hill Clinton Council Grove El Dorado Elk City Fall River Hillsdale John Redmond Klanopolis Marion Melvern Milford Perry Pomona Toronto Tuttle Creek Wilson KENTUCKY Barren River Buckhorn Carr Fork Cave Run Dewey Fishtrap Grayson Green River Martins Fork Nolin Rough River LOUISIANA Bayou Bodcau Caddo Lake Wallace Lake MARYLAND Bloomington Lake MASSACHUSETTS Barre Falls. Birch Hill Buffumville Conant Brook East Brimfield Hodges Village Knightville Littleville Tully West Hill Westville MINNESOTA Arkansas Missouri Arkansas Arkansas Arkansas Arkansas Missouri Arkansas Missouri Arkansas Missouri Missouri Missouri Missouri Arkansas Missouri Missouri Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Cumberland Ohio Ohio Red Red Red Potomac Connectivut Connecticut Thames Connecticut Connecticut Connecticut Connecticut Connecticut Connecticut Blackstone Thames Big Stone Lake- Whetstone River Upper Miss. Big Hill Creek Wakarusa River Grand (Neosho) Walnut River Elk River Fall River Big Bull Creek Grand )Neosho) Smoky Hill Riv. Cottonwood River Marias Des Cygnes Republican River Delaware River 110 Mile Creek Verdigris River Big Blue River Saline River Barren River Middle Fork of Kentucky River Carr Fork Licking River Johns Creek Levisa Fork, Big Sandy Riv. Little Sandy Green River Martins Fork Nolin River Rough River Bayou Bodcau Cypress Bayou Cypress Bayou North Branch Potomac River Ware River Millers River Little River Conant Brook Quinebaug River French River Westfield Riv. Middle Branch, Westfield Riv. Tully River West River Quinebaug Riv. Minnesota Riv. Cherryvale Lawrence Council Grove El Dorado Independence Fall River Kansas City Burlington Salina Marion Melvern Junction City Perry Pomona Toronto Manhattan Wilson Glasgow Buckhorn Hazard Farmers Paintsille Pikeville Grayson Campbellsville Harlan Kyrock Leitchfield Shreveport Shreveport Shreveport Barnum Barre S. Royalston Charlton Monson Fiskdale Oxford Huntington Chester Fry ille Uxbridge Sturbridge Ortonville 1981 1977 1964 1981 1966 1949 1981 1964 1948 1968 1972 1967 1969 1963 1960 1962 1964 40,600 379,200 112,265 236,200 284,300 265,400 160,000 630,250 450,000 143,850 363,000 1,160,000 770,000 230,000 199,700 2,346,000 776,000 1,240 7,000 3,235 8,000 4,450 2,350 4,580 9,280 3,815 6,200 6,930 15,600 12,200 4,000 2,720 15,800 9,000 1964 815,200 4,340 FARS 1960 168,000 550 FR 1976 47,700 530 FQRW 1974 614,100 6,790 FQRW 1949 93,000 1,100 FARW 1968 164,360 569 FARW 1967 118,990 1,050 FORW 1969 773,200 5,070 FRSQW 1978 21,000 578 FQ 1963 609,400 2,890 FAR 1978 334,400 2,180 FRX 1949 1971 1946 FSR Earth FSWAXR Earth FSQU Earth FSQR Earth FSQ Earth FSX Earth FSQR Earth FSQR Earth FRWX Earth FRQS Earth FRQWX Earth FRSXWQ Earth & Rock FRSXW Earth & Rock FRSWXQ Earth & Rock FX Earth FRWXQAN Earth & Rock FIRWXNA Earth Earth Earth Earth & Rock Earth & Rock Earth Rock Earth & Rock Earth & Rock Concrete Earth & Rock Earth & Rock 83 3,870 114 9,250 96 6,500 99 21,000 107 4,840 94 6,015 75 11,600 86.5 21,790 131 15,360 67 8,375 98 9,700 126 6,300 95 7,750 85 7,750 90 4,712 157 7,500 160 5,600 146 3,970 162 1,020 130 720 148 2,740. 118 913 195 1,100 120 1,460 142 2,350 97 574 174 990 124 1,530 357,300 NPP FRW Earth 76 12,850 175,000 32,700 NFRS Cone. & Earth [??] 4,934 88,300 2,300 FR Earth 48 4,934 1981 130,900 645 FQRS 1958 1941 1958 1966 1960 1959 1941 1965 1949 1960 1961 1973 24,000 49,900 12,700 3,740 30,000 12,800 49,000 32,400 22,000 12,350 11,100 NPP NPP 200 NPP 360 NPP NPP 275 300 NPP 23 FRW FRW FRW F FRW FRW FRW NFWS FRW FRW FRW 45,000 12,700 FRW Earth & Rock 296 2,130 Earth & Rock Earth & Rock Earth & Rock Earth & Rock Earth & Rock Earth & Rock Earth & Rock Earth & Rock Earth & Rock Earth & Rock Earth & Rock Earth 62 885 56 1,400 66 3,255 85 1,050 55 520H 55 2,140 160 1,200 164 1,360 62 1,570 51 2,400 78 560 25 13,700 A-3 APPENDIX A (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1981 Permanent Characteristics Pool of Dam Cal. Year Total (Acreage)' Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Length Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful Op. (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) (Feet) ~a1i l ~ Lac ul rar ler Chippewa River Lac Qui Parle Marsh Lake Orwell Red Lake MISSISSIPPI Arkabutla Lake Enid Lake Grenada Lake Okatibbee Sardis Lake MISSOURI Clearwater Long Beach Pomine de Terre Wappapello NEBRASKA Harlan County Papillion Creek and Tributaries: Glenn Cunningham (Site 11) Standing Bear Lake (Site 16) Salt Creek & Tributaries: Olive Creek (Site 2) Bluestem (Site 4) Wagon Train (Site 8) Stagecoach Yankee Hill (Site 10) Connestoga (Site 12) Twin Lake (Site 13) Pawnee (Site 14). Holmes Lake Branched Oak (Site 18) NEW HAMPSHIRE Blackwater Edward MacDowell Franklin Falls Upper Miss. Upper Miss. Upper Miss. Red River of the North Red River of the North Lower Miss. Lower Miss. Lower Miss. Pascagoula Lower Miss. White Grande Char. Missouri Lower Miss. Missouri Missouri Missouri Missouri Missouri Missouri Missouri Missouri Missouri Missouri Missouri Missouri Missouri Merrimack Merrimack Merrimack Chippewa River Minnesota Riv. Minnesota Riv. Otter Tail River Red Lake River Coldwater River Yocona River Yalobusha River Okatibbee Creek Little Tallahatchie River Black River Little Chariton Pomme de Terre Riv. St. Francis River Republican River Knight Creek Trib. of Big Papillion Creek Salt Creek Salt Creek Salt Creek Salt Creek Salt Creek Salt Creek Salt Creek Salt Creek Antelope Creek Oak Creek Blackwater Riv. Nubanusit Brook Pemigewasset Riv. Montevideo Montevideo Montevideo Fergus Falls Red River Arkabutla Enid Grenada Meridian Sardis Piedmont Macon Hermitage Wappapello Repub. City Omaha Omaha Kramer Sprague Holland Hickman Denton Denton Pleasantdale Emerald Lincoln Raymond Webster West Perterborough Franklin 1950 1950 1950 1953 1951 1943 1951 1954 1969 1940 1948 1980 1961 1941 1952 1975 1973 1966 1963 1963 1964 1966 1964 1966 1965 1963 1968 1941 1950 1943 (2) 122,800 35,000 14,100 2,680,000 525,300 660,000 1,337,400 142,400 1,570,000 413,700 65,000 650,000 613,200 NPP FRWX 6,500 FRWX 5,100 FRWX 210 FARS 279,000 FARSX 5,100 FRSW 6,100 FRSW 9,800 FRSW 1,280 FQSR 10,700 FRSW 1,630 FRWX 2,430 FRSQW 7,820 FRWXN 4,100 FR 850,000 13,600 FIRWX 392 137 174 315 303 196 208 230 255 728 100 1,780 17,900 5,200 5,470 10,260 9,280 6,640 7,560 10,640 8,080 29,520 6,510 97,560 46,000 12,800 154,000 FQRX FRX FR FR FR FR FR FR FR FR FR FR NPP FRW NPP FRW NPP FRW Earth & Rock Earth & Rock Earth & Rock Earth & Rock Earth & Rock Earth & Rock Earth & Rock Earth & Rock Earth Earth & Rock Earth & Rock Earth Earth & Rock Earth & Rock 23.3 21 19.5 47 15.5 95 99 102 67 117 154 71 155 109 17,975 4,100 11,800 1,355 36,500 11,500 8,400 13,900 6,543 15,300 4,225 3,800 4,630 2,700 Earth & Rock 107 11,827 Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth 67 70 45 57 52 48 52 63 58 65 55 70 75 67 140 1,940 1,460 3,020 2,760 1,650 2,250 3,100 3,000 2,075 5,000 7,700 5,200 1,150 1,030 1,740 A-4 Hopkinton-Everett 1962 Otter Brook Surry Mountain NEVADA Mathews Canyon Pine Canyon NEW MEXICO Abiquiu Cochiti Conchas Galisteo Jemez Canyon Two Rivers: Diamond "A" Dam Rocky Dam Santa Rosa Dam & Reservoir NEW YORK Almond Arkport East Sidney Mount Morris Whitney Point NORTH CAROLINA W. Kerr Scott NORTH DAKOTA Baldhill Bowman-Haley Homme Pipestem OHIO Alum Creek Berlin Caesar's Creek Clarence J. Brown Deer Creek Delaware Dillon Michael J. Kirwan Mosquito Creek Muskingum Riv. Reservoirs: Atwood Beach City Bolivar Charles Mill Clendening Dover Leesville Merrimack Merrimack Connecticut Connecticut Colorado Colorado Rio Grande Rio Grande Arkansas Rio Grande Rio Grande Rio Grande Rio Grande Pecos Susquehanna .Susquehanna Susquehanna Genesee Susquehanna Yad.-Pee Dee Red River of the North Missouri Red River of the North James River Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Contoocook Riv. Piscataquog Riv. Otter Brook Ashuelot River Mathews Canyon Pine Canyon Rio Chama Rio Grande Canadian River Galisteo Creek Jemez River Rio Hondo Rocky Arroyo Pecos Canacadea Creek Canisteo Creek Ouleout Creek Genesee River Otselic River Yadkin Sheyenne River North Fork, Grand River South Branch of Park River Pipestem Creek Alum Creek Mahoning River Caesar Creek Buck Creek Deer Creek Olentangy River Licking River West Branch, Mahoning River Mosquito Creek Indian Fork Sugar Creek Sandy Creek Black Fork Brushy Fork Tuscarawas Riv. McGuire Creek 71,500 200 FRW 1962 87,500 120 FRW 1958 18,300 85 FRW 1941 32.500 265 FRW W. Hopkinton East Weare Keene Keene Caliente Caliente Abiquiu Pena Blanca Tucumcari Albuquerque Bernalillo Roswell Santa Rosa NPP FX NPP FX 233 1,200 3,020 NPP 284 NPP FR FRWX FIRX FRX FX F 1958 1957 1963 1975 1939 1970 1953 1963 1979 449,000 NPP FIRX 14,640 7,950 33,550 337,000 86,440 153,000 70,000 92,980 3,650 146,880 134,800 91,200 242,200 63,700 102,500 132,000 273,000 78,000 104,100 49,700 71,700 149,600 88,000 54,000 203,000 37,400 124 NPP 210 170 1,200 FRW F FRW FR FRW 6,270 7,750 1,215,000 722,000 529,000 89,000 110,450 166,200 Hornell 1949 Hornell 1939 Sidney 1950 Mount Morris 1952 Binghamton 1942 Wilkesboro Valley City Haley Park River Jamestown 1963 1950 1967 1951 1974 Africa 1975 Deerfield 1943 Wilmington 1978 Springfield 1974 New Holland 1968 Delaware 1951 Zanesville 1961 Newton Falls 1966 Cortland 1944 New Cumberland 1937 Beach City 1937 Bolivar 1938 Mufflin 1936 Tippecanoe 1937 Dover 1938 Leesville 1937 Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth 76 790 115 2,000 133 1,288 86 1,670 71 800 92 884 Earth 325 1,540 Earth 251 28,815 Conc. & Earth 200 14,840 Earth 158 2,820 Earth 136 780 Earth 98 4,885 118 2,940 Earth 212 1,950 Earth 90 1,260 Earth 113 1,200 Cone. & Earth 130 2,010 Concrete 215 1,028 Earth 95 4,900 1,470 FARSX Earth 325 1,750 51 885 348 240 13,300 1,010 727 950 1,325 580 700 1,540 420 NPP 1,350 1,800 350 1,000 FARS FSRWX FARS FRWX FRSW FARSWQ FRSQW FQRW FRW FARWX FRWX FSQRS FARSWQ FRX FRX FR FRX FRX FRX FRX Earth Earth Earth Earth 148 1,740 61 1,650 79 5,730 67 865 108 4,000 Cone. & Earth 93 10,000 Cone. & Earth 96 5,750 Earth & Rock 165 2,750 Earth & Rock 72 6,620 Earth 93 3,880 Earth 92 18,600 Earth 118 1,400 Earth 83 9,900 Earth 47 5,650 Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Concrete Earth 65 3,700 64 5,600 87 6,300 48 1,390 64 950 83 824 74 1,694 A-5 APPENDIX A (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1981 Permanent Characteristics Pool of Dam Cal. Year Total (Acreage) 1 Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Length Name River Bashn Stream in Vicinity Useful Op. (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) (Feet) Mohawk Mohicanville Piedmont Pleasant Hill Senecaville Tappan Wills Creek North Branch of Kokosing Riv. Lake Paint Creek Tom Jenkins West Fork, Mill Creek William H. Harsha OKLAHOMA Birch Canton Fort Supply Great Salt Plains Heyburn Hugo Hulah Kaw Oologah Optima Pine Creek Waurika Wister OREGON Blue River Cottage Grove Dorena Fall Creek Fern Ridge PENNSYLVANIA Alvin R. Bush Aylesworth Creek Beltzville Blue Marsh Conemaugh Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Arkansas Arkansas Arkansas Arkansas Arkansas Red Arkansas Arkansas Arkansas Arkansas Red Red Arkansas Columbia Columbia Columbia Columbia Columbia Susquehanna Susquehanna Delaware. Delaware Ohio Walhonding Riv. Lake Fork Stillwater Creek Clear Fork Seneca Rork Little Stillwater Creek Wills Creek North Branch of Kokosing Riv. Paint Creek East Branch, Sunday Creek Mill Creek Little Miami Riv. Birch Creek N. Canadian Riv. Wolf Creek Salt Fork, Arkansas River Polecat Creek Kiamichi River Caney River Arkansas River Verdigris Riv. N. Canadian Riv. Little River Beaver Creek Poteau River Blue River Coast Fork, Willamette River Row River Middle Fork, Willamette River Long Tom Riv. Kettle Creek Aylesworth Cr. Pohopoco Iblephocken Conemaugh Riv. Nellie Mohicanville Piedmont Perrysville Senecaville Tappan Conesville Fredericktown New Petersburg Gloucester Mount Healthy Williamsburg Barnsdall Canton Woodward Cherokee Sapulpa Hugo Bartlesville Ponca City Claremore Hardesty Wright City Waurika Wister Blue River Cottage Grove Cottage Grove Eugene Eugene Renovo E. Jermyn Lehighton Reading Saltsburg 1937 1936 1937 1938 1937 1936 1937 1973 1972 1951 1952 1978 1977 1948 1942 1941 1950 1974 1950 1976 1963 1978 1969 1977 1949 1968 1942 1949 1965 1941 295,000 102,000 65,000 87,700 88,500 61,600 196,000 14,900 145,000 26,900 11,380 284,500 58,200 383,800 100,700 271,400 55,030 966,700 289,000 1,348,000 1,519,000 229,500 465,780 343,500 427,900 85,000 30,060 70,500 115,000 110,000 1962 75,000 1970 1,760 1971 68,250 1979 500,000 1952 274,000 NPP NPP 2,270 850 3,550 2,350 900 98 710 394 200 18,760 1,137 7,900 1,820 8,690 920 13,250 3,570 17,040 29,460 5,340 3,750 10,100 4,000 975 1,155 1,885 1,865 10,305 160 NPP 947 22,900 300 FR FR FRX FRX FRSX FRX FRX FRW FRSQW FRSWX FRX FRSQW FSQRW FSI FSX FRWX FRWXS FSQRW FSAX FSQRW FSN FSRW FSQW FISQWR FSAX FINR FINR FINR FINR FINR FRW F FQRSW FAQRS F Earth 111 2,330 Earth 46 1,220 Earth 56 1,750 Earth 113 775 Earth 45 2,350 Earth 52 1,550 Earth 87 1,950 Earth 71 1,400 Earth & Rock 118 700 Concrete 84 944 Earth 100 1,100 Earth 200 1,450 Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth 97 3,193 68 15,140 85 12,225 68 6,010 89 2,920 101 10,200 94 5,200 125 9,466 137 4,000 120 15,200 124 22,470 106 16,600 99 5,700 Earth 319 1,329 Cone. & Earth 114 2,110 Conc. & Earth 145 3,352 Rockfill & Concrete 193 5,100 Rkfl & Conc 49 6,624 Earth & Rock 165 1,350 Earth & Rock 90 1,270 Earth & Rock 170 4,200 Earth 98 1,175 Conc. & Earth 137 1,265 A-6 Cowanesque Crooked Creek Curwensville East Branch, Clarion River Foster Joseph Sayers Francis E. Walter (Bear Creek) Gen. Edgar Jadwin Indian Rock Kinzua Loyalhanna Mahoning Creek Prompton Raystown Shenango Stillwater Tioga-Hammond Lakes Tionesta Union City Woodcock Creek Youghiogheny River SOUTH DAKOTA Cold Brook Cottonwood Springs Lake Traverse: Reservation Control Dam White Rock TEXAS Addicks Bardwell Barker Belton Benbrook Canyon Ferrells Bridge Dam- Lake 0' the Pines Granger Dam & Lake Grapevine Hords Creek Lake Kemp Lavon Lewisville Navarro Mills North San Gabriel Dam, Lake Georgetown 0.C. Fisher Pat Mayse Proctor Somerville Susquehanna Ohio Susquehanna Ohio Susquehanna Delaware Delaware Susquehanna Ohio Ohio Ohio Delaware Susquehanna Ohio Susquehanna Susquehanna Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Missouri Missouri Red River of the North Red River of the North San Jacinto Trinity San Jacinto Brazos Trinity Guadalupe Red Brazos Trinity Colorado Red Trinity Trinity Trinity Brazos Colorado Red Brazos Brazos Cowanesque Riv. Crooked Creek West Branch, Susquehanna Riv. East Branch, Clarion River Bald Eagle Creek Lehigh River Dyberry Creek Codorus Creek Allegheny Riv. Loyalhanna Creek Mahoning Creek Lackawaxen Riv. Raystown Branch, Juniata River Shenango Riv. Lackawanna Riv. Tioga River Crooked Creek Tionesta Creek French Creek French Creek Youghiogheny Riv. Cold Brook Cottonwood Springs Creek Bois de Sioux River Bois de Sioux River S. Mayde Creek Waxahachie Creek Buffalo Bayou Leon River Clear Fork, Trinity River Guadalupe Cypress Creek San Gabriel Riv. Denton Creek Hords Creek Wichita River East Fork, Trinity River Elm Fork, Ttinity River Richland Creek North Fork, San Gabriel River N. Concho River Sanders Creek Leon River Yeuga Creek Lawrenceville Ford City Clearfield Wilcox Blanchard Wilkes-Barre Honesdale York Warren Saltsburg New Bethlehem Honesdale Huntingdon Sharpsville Forest City Tioga Tioga Tionesta Union City Meadville Confluence 1980 1940 1965 1952 1969 1961 1959 1942 1965 1942 1941 1960 1973 1966 1960 1979 1979 1940 1970 1973 1943 Hot Springs 1953 Hot Springs 1970 Wheaton Wheaton Addicks Ennis Barker Belton Ft. Worth New Braunfels Jefferson Granger Grapevine Coleman Wichita Falls Ft. Worth Lewisville Corsicana Georgetown San Angelo Paris Comanche Somerville 1941 1941 1948 1965 1945 1953 1952 1964 1959 1980 1952 1948 1972 1953 1953 1962 1980 1952 1967 1963 1967 89,000 93,900 124,200 84,300 99,000 110,000 24,500 28,000 1,180,000 95,300 74,200 52,000 762,000 191,400 12,000 62,00 63,000 133,400 47,640 20,000 254,000 7,200 8,400 164,500 85,000 204,500 140,000 207,000 1,097 258,600 740,900 842,100 244,200 435,500 25,310 502,900 748,200 989,700 212,200 130,800 396,400 189,100 374,200 507,500 410 350 790 90 1,730 90 NPP NPP 1,900 210 170 290 8,300 1,910 85 470 680 480 NPP 118 450 36 41 FR FRW FR FARQ FRW FNRW F FRW PFAQR FRW FRW FNRW FRW FAQRW FS FR FR FRW F FQRA FARWQ FRWX Earth FRWX Earth 10,925 FRX 6,500 FRX NPP 3,570 NPP 12,300 3,770 8,240 18,700 4,400 7,380 510 15,590 11,080 23,280 5,070 1,310 5,440 5,993 4,610 11,460 FX FRSX FX FIRSX FNRXA FRSX FRX FRSWX FNRSXA FARSX FX FRSX FRSX FRSX FRSWX FRSX FRSX FRSX FRSX A-7 Earth & Rock Earth Earth Earth Earth Rockfill Earth Earth Conc. & Earth Conc. & Earth Concrete Earth Earth & Rock Concrete Earth Earth & Rock Earth & Rock Earth Earth Earth Earth 151 3,100 143 1,480 131 2,850 184 1,725 100 6,835 263 3,500 109 1,255 83 1,000 177 1,877 144 960 162 925 140 1,230 225 1,700 68 720 77 1,700 140 2,738 122 6,000 154 1,050 88 1,420 90 4,650 184 1,610 127 925 123 1,190 14 9,100 16 14,400 49 61,166 82 15,400 37 72,844 192 5,524 130 9,130 224 6,830 97 10,600 115 16,320 137 12,850 91 6,800 115 8,890 69 9,499 125 32,888 82 7,570 164 6,700 128 40,885 96 7,080 86 13,460 80 26,175 Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth & Rock Earth Earth Earth Rock Earth Earth Earth Earth APPENDIX A (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1981 Name Stillhouse Hollow Waco Wright Patman VERMONT Ball Mountain North Hartland North Springfield Townshend Union Village VIRGINIA John W. Flannagan N. Fork of Pound River WASHINGTON Howard A. Hanson Mill Creek Mud Mountain Wynoochee WEST VIRGINIA Beech Fork Bluestone Burnsville East Lynn R.D. Bailey Summersville Lake Sutton Tygart River WISCONSIN Eau Galle ARIZONA Trilby Wash Detention Basin (McMichen) CALIFORNIA Big Dry Creek Camanche2 Cherry Valley3 Del Valle River Basin Brazos Brazos Red Connecticut Connecticut Connecticut Connecticut Connecticut Ohio Ohio Green Columbia Puyallup Chehalis Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Chippewa Gila San Joaquin San Joaquin Tuolumne Alameda Stream Lampasas Riv. Bosque River Sulphur River West River Ottauguechee Riv. Black River West River Ompompanoosuc Riv. Pound River North Fork, Pound River Green River Mill Creek White River Wynoochee Riv. Beech Fork New River Little Kanawha Twelve Pole Creek Guynabdot River Gauley River Elk River Tygart River Eau Galle Trilby Wash Big Dry Creek Mokelumne Riv. Cherry Creek Arroyo Del Valle Community in Vicinity Belton Waco Texarkana Jamaica N. Hartland Springfield Townshend Union Village Haysi Pound Kanaskat Walla Walla Enumclaw Montesano Lavalette Hinton Burnsville East Lynn Justice Summersville Sutton Grafton Spring Valley Phoenix Fresno Clements Sonora Livermore Cal. Year Placed in Useful Op. 1968 1965 1957 1961 1960 1960 1961 1950 1963 1966 1961 1942 1953 1972 1977 1952 1977 1970 1979 1965 1960 1938 1969 1956 1948 1963 1956 1968 Total Storage (Acre-Ft.) 630,400 726,400 2,654,300 54,600 71,420 51,067 33,700 38,000 145,700 11,293 106,000 8,300 106,000 70,000 37,540 631,000 65,400 82,500 203,700 413,800 265,300 287,700 43,600 Permanent Pool (Acreage)1 or No Pool (NPP) 6,430 7,270 20,300 75 220 290 100 NPP 310 106 1,600 225 NPP 1,150 450 1,800 550 823 440 407 270 620 150 19,300 16,250 431,500 268,000 77,000 NPP NPP NPP 475 200 Project Functions FRSX FRSX FRSX FRW FRW FRW FRW FRW FAQR FR FAS FR FR FSARI FRW FRWX FQRW FQRW FQRW FANR FARWX FNAR FR F F FRS FS FRS r Earth Earth Earth & Rock Earth & Rock Earth 34 40 171 315 223 A-8 Characteristics of Dam Height Type (Feet) Earth 200 Conc. & Earth 140 Earth 100 Conc. & Earth 265 Conc. & Earth 185 Conc. & Earth 120 Conc. & Earth 133 Conc. & Earth 170 Conc. & Earth 250 Rock 122 Rock 235 Earth 145 Rock 425 Conc. & Earth 177 Earth 86 Concrete 180 Conc. & Earth 89 Conc. & Earth 122 Earth & Rock 310 Rock 390 Concrete 220 Concrete 230 Earth 122 50,140 20,038 2,450 2,500 800 Length (Feet) 15,624 24,618 18,500 915 1,520 2,940 1,700 1,100 960 600 675 3,200 700 1,700 1,080 2,048 1,400 650 1,397 2,280 1,178 1,921 1,600 w . . .. . I Eaton Wash New Bullards Bare New Don Pedro3 New Exchequer2 Oroville2 Tahchevah Creek COLORADO Pinon Canyon CONNECTICUT East Branch Hall Meadow Brook Mad River Sucker Brook IDAHO Ririe MARYLAND Savage River MISSOURI Bear Creek NEW YORK Onondaga OKLAHOMA Lugert-Altus 4 Markham Ferry5 Pensacola5 UTAH Big Wash VERMONT East Barre Waterbury Wrightsville Rio Hondo Sacramento San Joaquin San Joaquin Sacramento Whitewater Colorado Houstatonic Mousatonic Connecticut Connecticut Upper Snake Potomac Upper Miss. Oswego Red Arkansas Arkansas Beaver Winooski Winooski Winooski Eaton Wash Yuba River Tuolumne Riv. Merced River Feather River Tahchevah Creek Pin. Can. Arroyo East Branch, Naugatuck River Hall Mead. Brook Mad River Sucker Brook Willow Creek Savage Bear Creek Onodaga Creek North Fork, Red Grand (Neosho) Riv. Grand (Neosho) Riv. Big Wash Jail Branch Waterbury North Branch, Winooski River Pasadena Marysville Modesto Merced Oroville Palm Springs Trinidad Torrington Torrington Winchester Winchester Idaho Falls Western Port Hannibal Syracuse Altus Locust Grove Disney Milford E. Barre Waterbury Wrightsville 1937 956 1968 960,000 1970 2,030,000 1966 1,026,000 1964 3,539,000 1965 960 1964 4,350 1964 1963 1963 1970 1979 1952 1962 1949 1948 1964 1941 1961 1960 1958 1958 4,350 8,620 9,799 1,480 100,500 20,000 8,700 18,200 154,145 444,500 2,197,000 1,200 23,500 82,100 36,000 NPP 1,910 3,520 1,900 5,838 NPP NPP NPP NPP 10 NPP 364 360 NPP NPP 6,260 10,9006 46,5006 NPP NPP 900 90 F FIRPW FISP FIR FIRSW 'F FRW FR F FR F FIR FRS F F FISR FRP FRP F F FRH FR Earth 82 1,795 Concrete 645 2,323 Earth & Rock 565 1,920 Rock 480 1,200 Earth 770 6,850 Earth 42 3,610 Earth 92 700 Earth Earth & Rock Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Concrete Conc. & Earth Concrete Earth Er & Rk Fill Er & Rk Fill Earth & Rock Fill 92 100 73 1,200 178 940 68 1,160 184 840 184 1,050 65 1,450 67 1,782 98 1,112 90 4,494 147 6,565 34 2,814 65 1,460 158 1,800 115 1,525 NOMENCLATURE FOR PROJECT FUNCTIONS: A - Low Flow Augmentation D - Debris Control F - Flood Control I - Irrigation N - Navigation P - Power Q - Water Quality Control R- Public Recreation (Annual Attendance exceeding 5,000) S - Water Supply W- Fish and Wildlife (Federal or State) X - Water Conservation and Sedimentation 1Acres of water surface at top of permanent pool. 2Federal Government contributed for flood control storage. 8Cherry Valley: Planned and constructed by local interests as initial phase; provided flood control on interim basis. Second and final phase, New Don Pedro Reservoir: Federal Government contributed for flood protection, construction and operation by City and County of San Francisco, and Turlock and Modesto Irrigation Districts. 'Construction by Bureau of Reclamation Participation by Department of the Army to finance flood control portion. 5Construction by Grand River Dam Authority Participation by Department of the Army to finance flood control portion. 'Ibp of power pool A-9 =APPENDIX B FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION DURING FISCAL YEAR 1981 Fiscal Year Fiseca Placed in Completed or Year Useful Scheduled for Project Started Operation Completion Nature of Project Abiquiu Dam, NM ....................................................................................... 1978 Allenville, AZ (Sec 205) .... ............................................................ 1981 Alum Creek Lake, OH ................. ....................... ...................................... 1970 Applegate, OR ............................ .......................................... 1974 Aquilla Lake, TX ......................................................................................... 1977 Arcadia Lake, OK ......................................... 1980 Arkansas-Red Basins Chloride Control (Area VIII), OK, TX, and KS (Stage I) .. ......................... 1976 B. Everett Jordan Dam and Lake, NC ........................... .......................... 1967 Bear Creek Lake, CO ...................................................................................... 1973 Beech Fork Lake, W V .. ... ..... ....................................................................... 1970 Big Sioux River at Sioux City, IA and SD ....... .. .............................................. 1976 Big South Fork National River & Recreation Area, KY and TN ............................................. 1979 Big Stone Lake & Whetstone River, MN and SD ................... ................................... 1971 Bloomington Lake, MD and WV ........................................................................................... 1971 Brookville Lake, IN ....................................................................................... ' 1966 Brush Bayou, LA .......... ............................................................................. 1977 Buchanan Dam, H.V. Eastman Lake, CA .................................................................. 1971 Buffalo Bayou and Tributaries, TX ........................................................ 1956 Buffalo Bayou & Tributaries, TX, Addicks and Barker Dams .. .................................... 1977 Bull Run, PA (Sec. 205) ................................................................................... 1979 Burnsville Lake, WV ........................ ....................................... 1972 Caesar Creek Lake, OH ..................................... ............................................... 1971 Candy Lake, OK ....... ......... ..................................................................... 1976 Caroline Beach & Vicinity, NC ........................................ 1965 Carr Fork Lake, KY . ......... .. ....... ................ ..... ............ ............................. 1966 Cattarauguos Creek at NYS Thruway NY (Sec 14) ......................................................... 1980 Cave Run Lake, NY ......... ....... ................................................................. 1965 Cayuga Creek, Cheektowaga, NY (Sec 205) ................................................. 1981 Central and Southern, FL .. .1950 Charles River (Natural Valley Storage), MA ......... .......... ....................................... 1977 Chartiers Creek, PA ..................................................................................... 1969 Chatfield Lake, CO .. ................................................................. 1967 Chena River Lakes, AK .................................................................................... 1973 Chillicothe, OH ....................................................................... 1971 Clayton Lake, OK .. ................................................................. 1975 Clinton, IA ........................................ 1974 Clinton Lake, KS ........................................ 1972 Cochiti Lake, NM ........................................ 1965 Columbia Drainage and Levee Dist. No. 3, IL ........................................ 1975 Cooper Lake and Channels, TX ........................................ 1958 Copan Lake, OK .......... ...... ........ .............................................................. 1973 Connecticut River, No. Stratford, NH (Sec 14) .......... ............................................... 1981 Corte M adera Creek, CA .................................................................................. 1966 Cowanesque Lake, PA .................................................................................... 1973 Cucamonga Creek, CA ..................................................................................... 1976 Dade County, FL .................................................... .................................... 1975 Dayton, KY .............................................. .............................................. 1978 1975 1980 1978 1981 1975 1981 1974 1975 1981 1978 1976 1974 1981 1976 1975 1981 1980 1980 1982 1983 1982 1983 1985 1984 1985 1982 1987 1981 1987 1985 1983 1982 1980 1982 Indefinite 1981 1982 1986 1985 Indefinite 1982 1981 1981 1985 1983 1999 1983 1981 1986 1994 1983 1983 1981 1982 1981 1981 1991 1983 1982 Indefinite 1982 1985 1982 1983 Major rehabilitation Local protection Reservoir Reservoir Reservoir Reservoir Reservoir Reservoir Reservoir Reservoir Local protection Reservoir Local protection Reservoir Reservoir Local protection lAservoir Local protection Major rehabilitation Local protection Reservoir Reservoir Reservoir Shore protection Reservoir Local protection Reservoir Local protection Local protection Non-structural local protection Local protection Reservoir Reservoirs and levee Local protection Reservoir Local protection Reservoir Reservoir Local protection Reservoir, channel improvement and levees Reservoir Local protection Local protection Reservoir Local protection Shore protection Local protection B-1 Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake & Channel, CA ......... .......................................... Duck Creek Channel Improvement, TX ........................................................ East Lynn Lake, WV ...................................................................... East Moline, IL.... ......... ............... ......................................... East Rockaway Inlet to Rockaway Inlet & Jamaica Bay, NY, Part I ...................................... East St. Louis and Vicinity, IL ............ .............................................................. El Dorado Lake, KS ............ ....................................................................... El Paso, TX ............................................................................. Elizabeth, N J .................. ............ .......................................................... Elk Creek Lake, OR ............. ....................................................................... Evansdale, IA ........................................................................... Evansville, IN ................. ......................................................................... Falls Lake, NC .................... .......................... ........................................... Fire Island Inlet to Montauk Point, NY .................................................................... (Remainder) ........................................................................... Fourmile Run, VA ........................ ............................................................. Four Rivers Basin, FL ............... ................................................................... Frazer-W olf Point, M T ............ ..................................................................... Freeport and Vicinity, TX ............ .................................................................. Fulton, IL .............................................................................. Gathright Dam and Lake Moormaw, VA....................................................... Genesee River, Amity, NY (Sec 14)......................................................................... Greenville, TX .......................................................................... Gypsum, KS (Sec. 205) ..................................................................... Harrisonville Levee and Drainage, Dist., IL .............................................................. Gypsum, KS (Sec. 205)...... Highway 43 Bridge, Chickasaw Bogue, Linden, AL (Sec 14) ......... ............................... Hillsdale Lake, KS ... ........... ............................ ........................ Holla Creek, Chickasaw & Clay Cos., MS (Sec 208) .. ............................................. Housatonic River, Salisbury, CT (Sec 14) ................................................................... Housatonic River, Sheffield, MA (Sec 14) ......................... ......................... I-20 Bridge, Pearl River, Jackson MS (Sec 14) ........................................................... Iao Stream, Maui, HI .................................................. ......................... Indian Bend Wash, AZ ............................................ ........................... Israel River, Lancaster, NH (Sec. 205) ......................................................... Joe Creek, OK ............................................................. Johnson Bay, Lubec, M E (Sec 14) .......................................................................... Kalapana Road Protection, Hawaii, HI (Sec 14) .......................................................... Kaneohe, Kailua Area, Oahu, HI ............... ......... ..................................... Kansas City, KS (1962 Mod.) ................................. ................................. Kaskaskia Island Drainage 7 Levee Dist, IL .............................................................. Kaw Lake, OK ..... ......................................... .................................. Keshequa Creek, NY (Sec 14 ........... ..................... ........................................... Lake Pontchartrain, LA ........................................... ............................ Lakeview Lake, TX ............. ....................................................................... Larose to Golden Meadow, LA ........ ............. .......................................... Lavon Lake Modification and East Fork Channel Improvement, TX ...................................... Lawrence, KS ............................................................................ Leith Creek, NC (Sec 205) ....................................................................... ......... Levee Unit 5, Wabash River, IN ......................................................... Lowisville Dam, TX ........................................ Little Blue River Channel, MO ........................................ Little Blue River Lakes, MO ........................................ Long Branch Lake, MO ................................................................. Lower Columbia River Bank Protection OR and WA ...................................................... Lytle and Warm Creeks, Santa Ana River Basin, CA ..................................................... Mankato and N. Mankato, MN ........................................ M arengo, IA ........... ...................................... ................................. . . M artins Fork Lake, KY .................................................. ................................ McGee Creek Drainage and Levee Dist., IL .................................................................. Mentor Beach Park, OH (Sec 14) ........................................ Mentor on the Lake, OH (Sec 14) ........................................ M ilan, IL .................... .................................. ......................................... 1967 1973 1965 1980 1975 1972 1974 1971 1972 1972 1981 1939 1973 1963 1963 1974 1966 1980 1966 1978 1967 1981 1973 1978 1974 1974 1980 1975 1978 1981 1981 1981 1977 1976 1979 1978 1980 1980 1976 1971 1980 1966 1981 1967 1975 1972 1970 1967 1981 1964 1979 1975 1978 1973 1962 1973 1971 1978 1973 1979 1981 1981 1980 Indefinite Indefinite 1970 1982 1983 1977 1988 Indefinite 1981 1982 1973 Indefinite 1988 Indefinite 1982 1988 1988 Indefinite Indefinite 1984 1991 1981 1981 1981 1982 1983 1981 1982 1979 1982 1980 1982 1981 1981 1986 1980 1980 1981 1982 1980 1981 1981 1981 1981 1981 1981 1982 1981 1984 1981 1981 1981 1980 1980 1981 1981 Indefinite 1984 1976 1981 1982 Indefinite 1988 1992 1976 (mod.) 1983 1969 1980 1980 1978 1981 1982 1983 1983 1985 1987 1986 1989 1980 1989 1981 1982 1984 1985 Reservoir Local protection Reservoir Local protection Beach nourishment Local protection Reservoir Local protection Local protection Reservoir Local protection Local protection Reservoir Local protection Local protection Local protection Local protection Local protection Local protection Local protection Reservoir Local protection Local protection Local protection Local protection Local protection Local protection Reservoir Local protection Local protection Local protection Local protection Local protection Local protection Local protection Local protection Local protection Emergency protection Local protection Local protection Local protection Reservoir Local protection Local protection Reservoir Local protection Reservoir and channel improvement Local protection Local protection Local protection Major rehabilitation Local protection Reservoir Reservoir Local protection Local protection Local protection Local protection Reservoir Local protection Local protection Local protection Local protection B-2 _ APPENDIX B (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION DURING FISCAL YEAR 1981 Fiscal Year Fiscal Placed in Completed or Year Useful Scheduled for Project Started Operation Completion Nature of Project M inot, N D ...................................................................................... Miss R. Ag Area 8, Elsberry, MO ................. ..................... ..................... Missouri River, Garrison Dam to Lake Oahe, ND and SD.. ........................................ Missouri River Levee System, IA, NE, KS, and MO .............................................. Muscatine (Mad Creek), IA (Stage I) .......................................................... Muskingham River Lakes, OH ........................................ Namo River, Guam (Sec. 205) ......................................................................... New Athens, IL ............. .......................... ............................................... N ew London, CT .. . ......... ......................................................................... New Orleans to Venice, LA ............................................................................... N ew ark, O H ............................................................................. Okanogan River, Oriville, WA'(Sec 205) ............ ................. ..................................... Pago Pago International Airport, American Samoa (Sec 14) ............................................ Paintsville Lake, KY .................................................................... Papillion Creek and Tributaries Lake, NE .............................................................. Park River, Hartford, CT ........................................ Patoka Lake, IN ..... ..... .......................................................................... Pearson-Skubitz Big Hill Lake, KS ......................................................................... Perry County L & D Nos. 1, 2, 3, MO ........... ......................................................... Phoenix AZ, and Vicinity (including New River) .......................................................... Pacer Creek, ID ........................................ Port Arthur and Vicinity, TX ............................................................................. Portugues and Bucana Rivers, PR ...................................................................... Ponta Salinas, PR (Sec 103) ...................................... ................ ........ Prairie Du Chien, WI .. ...................................... .............................. Presque Isle Peninsula, PA ............ ................................................................. R.D. Bailey Lake, W V ........................... ... ....................................... ........... Raritan Bay and Sandy Hook Bay, NJ, Matawan and Union Beach Sections .............................. Ray Roberts Lake, TX ........................................ Red River below Denison Dam, TX ....................................... Rend Lake, IL .................................................................. Rockford, IL (Kent Creek) ............ .................................................................. Sacramento River Bank Protection, CA ................................................................. Sacramento River, Chico Landing to Red Bluff, CA ....................................................... Sacramento River Flood Control, CA ........................................ Sacramento River, Major and Minor Tributaries, CA .................................................... Saginaw River, M I ............. ........................................................................ San Antonio Channel Improvement, TX .................................................................... San Gabriel River, TX .................................................................................... Santa M aria Valley Levees, CA ............................................................................ Sante Rosa Dam and Reservoir ........... .............................................................. Saylorville Lake, IA ............... .............................................................. Scajaquada Creek, NY ............................................................................. .... Shelton, Creek, W A ......... ........................................................................... Skiatook Lake, OK ............. ........................................................................ Sm ithville Lake, M O ....... ..... ...................................................................... Southwestern Jefferson County, KY ........................................................................ St. Louis, M O .............. ............................................................................ Stonewall Jackson Lake, WV ........................................................................... 1972 1979 1965 1948 1978 1976 1978 1965 1978 1969 1976 1978 1979 1973 1972 1976 1972 1974 1977 1973 1981 1966 1975 1981 1979 1975 1967 1965 1975 1948 1966 1979 1963 1963 1918 1949 1965 1957 1973 1959 1974 1965 1978 1976 1974 1974 1974 1959 1977 1978 1980 1981 1981 1974 1978 1981 1981 1970 1979 1980 1979 1977 1973 1980 1982 1982 1993 1980 1987 1980 1981 1984 Indefinite 1986 1981 1980 1985 1988 1981 1983 1985 1983 1992 1983 1982 1989 1982 1982 1986 1985 Indefinite 1989 1981 1979 1985 Indefinite Indefinite Indefinite 1985 1992 1990 1983 1982 1983 1991 1982 1978 1987 1982 1986 1980 1978 Local protection Local protection Local protection Local protection Local protection Major rehabilitation Local protection Local protection Local protection Local protection Local protection Local protection Emergency protection Reservoir Reservoir Local protection Reservoir Reservoir Local protection Local protection Local protection Local protection Local protection Local protection Non-structural local protection Beach replenishment Reservoir Local protection Reservoir Local protection Reservoir Local protection Local protection Local protection Local protection Local protection Local protection Local protection Reservoir Local protection Reservoir Reservoir Local protection Local protection Reservoir Reservoir Local protection Local protection Reservoir B-3 Sturgis, SD (See. 205) ..................................................................................... 1979 Taylorsville Lake, KY ................................................................ 1974 Texas City and Vicinity, TX (1958 authorization) .. ..................... ................. 1962 Three Rivers, TX ..................... ..................................................... 1979 Tioga-Hammond Lakes, PA ................ ................................ ..................... 1972 Tombigbee River Tributaries, AL and MS ........................................................................... 1965 Trinidad Lake, CO ................................................................... 1968 Vince and Little Vince Bayous, TX ......................................................................... 1968 W alnut Creek,.CA ......................................................................................... 1964 W aterloo, IA ....................................................................... 1973 W aurika Lake, OK .................................................................. 1971 Wild Rice River, S. Branch Felton Ditch, MN ........................................................... 1981 Willamete River Basin Bank Protection, OR ............................................................. 1938 W illiam H. Harsha Lake, OH ............................................................................. . 1970 W illow Creek, OR .............................................. ........................................ 1974 W inona, M N ......................... .................................................................. 1979 Wood River Drainage and Levee District, IL ......................................................................... 1953 Wrightsville Beach, NC ................................................................................... 1965 Yatesville Lake, KY ............................................. .......................... 1964 Yonkers, NY .......................... ... ................... ' 1975 B-4 1980 1978 1977 1977 1978 1981 1978 1983 1983 Indefinite Indefinite 1981 1986 1986 1983 1982 1982 1988 1984 1984 1984 1984 1981 Not scheduled 1981 Local protectini Reservoir Local protection Local protection Reservoir Local protection Reservoir Local protection Local protection Local protection Reservoir Local protection Local protection Reservoir Reservoir Local protection Local protection Shore protection Reservoir Local protection APPENDIX C NAVIGATION LOCKS AND DAMS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1981 SLocks Dams Authorized Channel Available Width Length Lift at Miles of for Normal Depth on Sills Above Community Cham- Full Pool Length, Year Length Depth Width Project Mouth In Vicinity ber Width Level Upper Lower Type' (feet) Opened (miles) (feet) (feet) Alabama-Coosa Rivers, AL Claiborne Lock and Dam Millers Ferry Lock and Dam Jones Bluff Lock and Dam Allegheny River, PA and NY Lock and Dam No. 2 Lock and Dam No. 3 Lock and Dam No. 4 Lock and Dam No. 5 Lock and Dam No. 6 Lock and Dam No. 7 Lock and Dam No. 8 Lock and Dam No. 9 Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, and Flint Rivers, GA, AL and FL Jim Woodruff Lock and Dam George W. Andrews Lock and Dam Walter F. George Lock and Dam Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Albemarle and Chesapeake Canal Route: Great Bridge Lock Dismal Swamp Canal Route: Deep Creek Lock South Mills Lock Bayou Teche, LA Berwick Lock Keystone Lock Black Rock Channel and Black Rock Lock Black Warrior, Warrior, and Ibmbigbee Rivers, AL Coffeeville (Jackson) Lock and Dam Demopolis Lock and Dam Warrior Lock and Dam Wm. Bacon Oliver Lock and Dam Holt Lock and Dam John Hollis Bankhead Lock and Dam (new lock) Canaveral Harbor, FL Canaveral Lock Cape Fear River, NC Lock and Dam No. 1 Lock and Dam No. 2 81.82 Claiborne, AL 142.32 Camden, AL 245.42 Benton, AL 6.7 Aspinwall, PA 14.5 Cheswick, PA 24.2 Natrona, PA 30.4 Freeport, PA 36.3 Clinton, PA 45.7 Kittanning, PA 52.6 Templeton, PA 62.2 Rimer, PA 84 600 84 600 84 600 56 360 56 360 56 360 56 360 56 360 56 360 56 360 56 360 107.6 Chattahoochee, FL 82 450 154.36 Columbia, GA . 82 450 182.8' Fort Gaines, GA 82 450 11.56 Great Bridge, VA 75 600 10.6s Deep Creek, VA 52 300 33.2 South Mills, NC 52 300 1.58 Berwick, LA 45 307 72.58 New Iberia, LA 36 162 0.0 Buffalo, NY 68 625 116.60 Coffeeville, AL 110 600 213.210 Demopolis, AL 110 600 261.110 Eutaw, AL 110 600 338.110 Tuscaloosa, AL 95 460 347.0"o Holt, AL 110 600 365.110 Adger, AL 110 600 2.7 Cocoa, FL 90 600 67.0 Kings Bluff, NC 40 200 99.0 Browns Landg. NC 40 200 30 45 45 11 13 10 12 12 13 18 22 33 25 88 3 12 12 7' 9 5 33 40 22 28 64 68 3 11 9 16 16 16 11 12 9 10 11 11 14 11 14 19 18 16' 121 127 97' 9 22 13 13 13 12 19 13 14 9 12 13 Movable 13 Movable 13 Movable 12 Fixed 11 Fixed 10 Fixed 11 Fixed 11 Fixed 10 Fixed 10 Fixed 11 Fixed 14 Movable 13 Movable 13 Movable 16' None 127 None 12' None 97 None 8 Fixed 22 None 13 Movable 13 Fixed 13 Movable 12 Fixed 13 Movable 13 Fixed 14 None 9 Fixed 12 Fixed 3,1608 1973 9,900$ 1969 14,9628 1974 1,393 19342@ 1,436 19342a 876 1927 780 1927 1,140 1928 916 1930 984 1931 950' 1938 5,924 1957 620 1963 13,371 1963 1932 1940 1941 1950 175 1913 1914 1,185 1965 1,485 1962 1,832 1962 700 1940 1,138 1969 1,170 1975 1965 275 1915 229 1917 60.5 103.1 88.0 7.8 9.7 6.2 5.9 9.4 6.9 9.6 9.8 46.7 28.5 85.0 9 200 9 200 9 200 9 200 9 200 9 200 9 200 9 200 9 200 9 200 9 200 6 100 6 100 6 100 9 90 9 50 9 50 8 80 34.5 6 80 21 200 96.6 9 200 47.9 9 200 77.0 9 200 8.9 9 18.1 9 200 42.7 9 200 12 125 32.0 8 100 24.0 8 100 C-1 William O. Huske Lock and Dam Central and Southern Florida S-61 Lock S-65 Lock S-65A Lock S-65B S-65C Lock S-65D Lock S-65E Lock S-308B Columbia River, OR and WA Bonneville Lock and Dam The Dalles Lock and Dam John Day Lock and Dam McNary Lock and Dam Cross-Florida Barge Canal Inglis Lock, Dam and Spillway Eureka Lock and Dam Henry H. Buckman Lock Cumberland River, KY and TN Barkley Dam Cheatham Lock and Dam Old Hickory Lock and Dam Cordell Hull Dam and Reservoir Fox River, WI DePere Lock DePere Dam Little Kaukauna Lock Little Kaukauna Dam Rapide Croche Lock Rapide Croche Dam Kaukauna Fifth Lock Kaukauna Fourth Lock Kaukauna Third Lock Kaukauna Second Lock Kaukauna First Lock Kaukauna Dam Kaukauna Guard Lock Little Chute combined Lock Lower Upper Little Chute Second Lock Little Chute First (Guard) Lock Little Chute-Dam Cedars Lock Cedars Dam Appleton Fourth Lock Appleton Lower Dam Appleton Third Lock Appleton Second Lock Appleton First Lock Appleton Upper Dam Menasha Lock Menasha Dam Freshwater Bayou, LA Freshwater Bayou Lock Green and Barren Rivers, KY Green River: Lock and Dam No. 1 Lock and Dam No. 2 123.0 'Iblars Landing, NC 40 300 9 9 9 Fixed 0.0 St. Cloud, FL 56.0 Frostproof, FL 46.0 Avon Park, FL 32.0 Sebring, FL 25.0 Sebring, FL 16.0 Okeechobee, FL 12.0 Okeechobee, FL 38.7 Port Mayaca, FL 146.0 Bonneville, OR 190.0 The Dalles, OR 215.0 Rufus, OR 282.0 Umatilla, OR 168.611 Inglis, FL 20.0 90.4 Palatka, FL 30.6 Kuttawa, KY 148.7 Ashland City, TN 216.2 Old Hickory, TN 313.5 Carthage, TN 7.1 DePere, WI 7.2 DePere, WI 13.0 DePere, WI 13.0 DePere, WI 19.2 Wrightstown, WI 19.3 Wrightstown, WI 22.8 Kaukauna, WI 23.1 Kaukauna, WI 23.3 Kaukauna, WI 23.4 Kaukauna, WI 23.6 Kaukauna, WI 24.0 Kaukauna, WI 24.0 Kaukauna, WI 25.4 Little Chute, WI 25.4 Little Chute, WI 26.4 Little Chute, WI 26.5 Little Chute, WI 26.6 Little Chute, WI 27.3 Little Chute, WI 27.4 Little Chute, WI 30.7 Appleton, WI 30.9 Appleton, WI 31.3 Appleton, WI 31.6 Appleton, WI 31.9 Appleton, WI 32.2 Appleton, WI 37.8 Menasha, WI 37.8 Menasha, WI 19.08 Intracoastl. City, LA 9.1 Spottsville, KY 63.1 Calhoun, KY 30 90 30 90 30 90 30 90 30 90 30 90 30 90 56 400 76 500 86 675 86 675 86 675 84 600 84 600 84 600 110 800 110 800 84 400 84 400 36 146 36 '146 36 146 36 144 37 144 37 144 35 144 35 144 40 35 147 36 144 35 144 35 35 144 35 144" 2 6 666 66 14 65 88 110 75 28 20 20 57 26 60 59 9 7 8 9 10 10 11 11 9 11 11 14 7 10 6666666 14 32 15 15 15 18 14 11 14 14 14 10 8 9 77767 688 6 None 6 None 6 None 6 None 6 None 6 None 6 None 14 Movable 24 Movable 15 Movable 15 Movable 20 Movable 15 Movable 14 Movable 15 None 13 Movable 12 Movable 10 Movable 13 Movable 12 Movable 10 Movable 10 Movable 76666 Movable Movable 7 Movable 8 Movable 220 1935 20.0 8 100 1963 1964 1967 1965 1965 1964 1964 1977 2,680 1938 8,735 1957 5,900 1968 7,365 1953 5,100 1968 3,830 1971 1972 9,959 1964 801 1959 3,605 1957 1,138 1973 1936 986 1929 1936 588 1926 1934 462 1930 1898 1879 1879 1903 1883 603 1931 1891 1879 1879 1881 1904 562 1932 1888 654 1933 .1907 549 1934 35 144 9 6 9 1900 35 145 10 7 6 1901 35 145 10 7 6 1884 Movable 691 1940 35 144 8 7 8 j 1889 Movable 401 1937 84 600 16 16 None 401 1968 84 600 12 12 11 Fixed 482 1956 84 600 14 15 12 Fixed 519 1956 28.0 20,0 14.0 7.0 9.0 4.0 15.0 47.5 25.0 76.0 64.0 11.0 21.2 118.1 67.5 97.3 71.9 5.9 5.9 6.2 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.4 1.4 0.1 0.8 3.4 0.6 0.3 0.3 5.1 44.0 8 20 3 30 3 30 3 30 3 30 3 30 3 30 8 100 27 300 14 250 14 250 14 250 12 150 12 150 12 150 9 150 9 159 9 150 9 150 6 100 6 100 6 100 *6 100 6 100 6 100 6 100 6 100 6 100 6 100 6 100 6 100 6 100 6 100 6 100 6 100 6 100 6 100 6 100 C-2 12 125 54.0 9 200 45.4 9 200 APPENDIX C (Continued) NAVIGATION LOCKS AND DAMS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1981 Locks Dams Authorized Channel Available Width Length Lift at Miles of for Normal Depth on Sills Above Community Cham- Full Pool Mouth In Vicinity ber Width Level Upper Lower Type' 108.5 Rochester, KY 36 138 17 7 6 Fixed 149.0 Woodbury, KY 35 138 16 7 7 Fixed 15.0 Greencastle, KY 45 360 15 12 9 Fixed Project Lock and Dam No. 3 Lock and Dam No. 412 Barren River: Lock and Dam No. 1" Gulf Intracoastal Waterway Inner Harbor Navigation Channel Lock Harvey Lock Algiers Lock Bayou Boeuf Lock Bayou Sorrel Lock Port Allen Lock Vermillion Lock Calcasieu Lock Brazos River Floodgates Colorado River, TX East Lock West Lock Hudson River, NY Toy Lock and Dam Illinois Waterway, IL LaGrange Lock and Dam Peoria Lock and Dam Starved Rock Lock and Dam Marseilles Lock Marseilles Dam Dresden Island Lock and Dam Brandon Road Lock and Dam Lockport Lock Thomas J. O'Brien Lock and Dam Inland Route, MI Crooked River Lock and Weir Kanawha River, WV Winfield Lock and Dam Marmet Lock and Dam London Lock and Dam Kaskaskia River, IL Kaskaskia Lock and Dam Lock and Dam No. 1 Lock and Dam No. 2 Lock and Dam No. 3 Lock and Dam No. 4 Lock and Dam No. 5 Lock and Dam No. 6 317 None 12' None 137 None 137 None 147 None 14' None 11' None 137 None 157 None 157 None 157 None 13 Movable 13 Movable 12 Movable 14 Movable 14 Movable 12 Movable 14 Movable 15 None 14 Movable 7.9 SSP Weir 12 Movable 12 Movable 12 Movable 11 Movable 15 Fixed 6 Fixed 7 Fixed 6 Fixed 6 Fixed 6 Fixed Length Depth Width (miles) (feet) (feet) 40.5 6 200 19.1 6 200 15.1 6 200 Length Year (feet) Opened. 353 1836 409 1839 276 1934 1923 1935 1956 1956 1952 1961 1934 1950 1943 1954 1954 1,495 1917 1,066 1939 536 1939 1,280 1933 1933 819 1933 1,616 1933 2,373 1933 1933 257 1960 834 1937 834 1937 707 1934 707 1934 130 1973 424 1839 400 1939 465 1844 543 1844 556 1844 413 1891 .. . 2.2 77.5 73.3 13.6 26.9 24.6 14.5 5.1 6.9 36.7 36.7 15.0 7.8 35.0 27.0 11.0 23.0 17.2 14.0 20.8 12 150 12 125 16 150 16 150 12 125 12 125 16 200 16 200 12 125 12 125 12 125 14 200 9 300 9 300 9 300 9 300 9 300 9 300 9 300 9 300 9 300 9 300 9 300 9 300 9 225 6 100 6 100 6 100 6 100 6 100 6 100 92.814 New Orleans, LA 75 640 99 317 98.34 Harvey, LA ( 75 425 109 127 88.0" Algiers, LA i 75 797 109 137 93.3 Morgan City, LA 75 1,158 69 137 131.06 Plaquemine, LA 56 800 109 147 228.51 Port Allen, LA 84 1,198 45 137 162.71s Abbeville, LA 56 1,200 3' 117 238.515 Lake Charles, LA 75 1,206 69 137 404.116 Freeport, TX 75 157 444.8 Matagorda, TX 75 1,200 59 157 444.8 Matagorda, TX 75 1,200 59 157 153.8 Troy, NY 44 493 17 16 80.2 Beardstown, IL 1110 600 10 16 157.7 Peoria, IL 110 600 11 16 231.0 Utica, IL o110 600 19 17 244.6 Marseilles, IL 110 600 24 19 247.0 Marseilles, IL 271.5 Morris, IL 110 600 22 17 286.0 Joliet, IL 110 600 34 18 291.1 Lockport, IL 110 600 46 12 326.5 Chicago, IL 110 1,000 2 14 30.0 Alanson, MI 17.8 66 1 6.9 31.1 Winfield, WV 56 360 28 18 67.8 Marmet, WV 56 360 24 18 82.8 London, WV 56 360 24 18 .8 Ellis Grove, IL 84 600 32 18 4.0 Carrolton, KY 38 145 8 8 31.0 Lockport, KY 38 145 14 8 42.0 Gest, KY 38 145 13 9 65.0 Frankfort, KY 38 145 13 " 6 82.2 Tyrone, KY 38 145 15 10 96.2 High Bridge, KY 52 147 14 9 C-3 Lock and Dam No. 7 Lock and Dam No. 8 Lock and Dam No. 9 Lock and Dam No. 10 Lock and Dam No. 11 Lock and Dam No. 12 Lock and Dam No. 13 Lock and Dam No. 14 Lake Washington Ship Canal Hiram M. Chittendon Lock Large Lock Small Lock McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System, AR and OK Norrell Lock and Dam Lock No. 2 Dam No. 2 Lock and Dam No. 3 Lock and Dam No. 4 Lock and Dam No. 5 David D. Terry Lock and Dam Murray Lock and Dam Toad Suck Lock and Dam Lock and Dam No. 9 Dardanelle Lock and Dam Ozark-Jeta Taylor Lock and Dam Lock and Dam No. 13 W.D. Mayo Lock and Dam Robert S. Kerr Lock and Dam and Reservoir Webbers Falls Lock and Dam Chouteau Lock and Dam Newt Graham Lock and Dam Mississippi River Between Ohio and Missouri Rivers Lock and Dam No. 27 Between Missouri Riv. & Minneapolis, MN Lock and Dam No. 26 Lock and Dam No. 25 Lock and Dam No. 24 Lock and Dam No. 22 Lock and Dam No. 21 Lock and Dam No. 20 Lock and Dam No. 19 Lock and Dam No. 18 Lock and Dam No. 17 Lock and Dam No. 16 Locks and Dam No. 15 Locks and Dam No. 14 Lock and Dam No. 13 Lock and Dam No. 12 Lock and Dam No. 11 . Lock and Dam No. 10 Lock and Dam No. 9 Lock and Dam No. 8 Lock and Dam No. 7 Lock and Dam No. 6 117.0 High Bridge, KY 139.0 Camp Nelson, KY 157.5 Valley View, KY 176.4 Ford, KY 201.0 Irvine, KY 220.9 Ravenna, KY 239.9 Willow, KY 249.0 Heidelberg, KY 1.3 Seattle, WA 1.3 Seattle, WA 10.3 Arkansas Post, AR 13.3 Arkansas Post, AR 40.5 Arkansas Post, AR 50.2 Grady, AR 66.0 Pine Bluff, AR 86.3 Redfield, AR 108.1 Little Rock, AR 125.4 Little Rock, AR 155.9 Conway, AR 176.9 Morrilton, AR 205.5 Russellville, AR 256.8 Ozark, AR 292.8 Fort Smith, AR - 319.6 Fort Smith, AR 336.2 Sallisaw, OK 366.6 Webbers Falls, OK 401.6 Muskogee, OK 421.6 Inola, OK 185.116 Granite City, IL 202.917 Alton, IL 241.417 Cap Au Gris, MO 273.417 Clarksville, MO 301.217 Saverton, MO 324.917 Quincy, IL 343.217 Canton, MO 364.117 Keokuk, IA 410.517 Burlington, IA 437.117 New Boston, IL 457.217 Muscatine, IA 482.917 Rock Island, IL 493.117 LeClaire, IA 493.317 LeClaire, IA 522.517 Clinton, IA 556.717 Bellevue, IA 583.017 Dubuque, IA 615.117 Guttenberg, IA 647.917 Lynxville, IA 679.217 Genoa, WI 702.517 Dresbach, MN 714.317 Trempealeau, WI 52 147 52 146 52 148 52 148 52 148 52 148 52 148 52 148 15 19 17 17 18 17 18 17 9 11 11 9 10 10 10 9 80 760 26 16 28 123 26 16 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 30 20 20 14 17 18 18 16 19 54 34 20 20 48 30 21 21 16 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 14 18 19 15 15 110 1,200 21 16 110 1,200 21 16 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 .100 110 110 110 80 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 600 360 600 600 600 600 600 600 1,200 600 600 600 600 360 320 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 C-4 24 24 15 15 10 10 10 38 38 10 89 16 16 11 11 11 9 11 89 11 86 19 16 19 19 18 17 15 14 15 17 16 17 27 27 18 21 19 17 19 15 16 22 18 17 7 Fixed 6 Fixed 7 Fixed 6 Fixed 6 Fixed 6 Fixed 6 Fixed 6 Fixed 29 Movable 16 15 Fixed 14 Movable 14 Movable 14 Movable 14 Movable 14 Movable 14 Movable 14 Movable 14 Movable 14 Movable 15 Movable 14 Movable 15 Movable 14 Movable 16 Movable 14 Movable 14 Movable 15 Fixed 15 10 Movable 10 12 Movable 12 Movable 14 Movable 12 Movable 12 Movable 9 Fixed 13 14 Movable 13 Movable 12 Movable 11 Movable 11 11 14 Movable 13 Movable 13 Movable 13 Movable 12 Movable 13 Movable 14 Movable 12 Movable 13 Movable . 350 1897 257 1900 362 1907 472 1907 208 1906 240 1910 248 1915 248 1917 235 1916 4,677 1967 1967 42,073 1968 6,110 1968 5,745 1968 7,455 1968 8,890 1968 3,930 1969 1,580 1969 1,505 1969 1,815 1969 2,480 1969 4,725 1969 7,400 1970 7,230 1970 4,370 1970 11,490 1979 1,630 1970 22.9 17.6 18.9 24.6 19.9 19.0 9.1 9.6 6 100 6 100 6 100 6 100 6 100 6 100 6 100 6 100 17.0 34 150 3.0 36.9 15.8 20.3 21.8 17.3 30.5 21.0 28.6 51.3 36.0 26.8 16.6 9 250 9 250 9 250 9 250 9 250 9 250 9 250 9 250 9 250 9 250 9 250 9 250 9 250 30.4 9 250 34.8 9 250 20.2 9 150 23.7 9 150 3,240 1963 17.8 9 200 1,725 ' 1938 1,296 1939 4,280 1940 1,024 1938 1,066 1938 2,144 1936 4,434 1913 1957 1,350 1937 921 1939 1,099 1937 1,203 1934 1922 1,343 1939 1,066 1939 849 1938 1,278 1937 763 1936 811 1938 897 1937 940 1937 893 1936 38.5 32.0 27.8 23.7 18.3 21.0 46.3 26.6 20.1 25.7 10.4 29.2 34.2 26.3 32.1 32.8 31.3 25.3 11.8 14.2 9 200 9 200 9 200 9 NS 9 NS 9 NS 9 NS 9 NS 9 NS 9 NS 9 NS 9 NS 9 NS 9 NS 9 NS 9 NS 0 NS 9 NS 9 NS 9 NS APPENDIX C (Continued) NAVIGATION LOCKS AND DAMS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1981 Locks Dams Authorized Channel Available Width Length Lift at Miles of for Normal Depth on Sills Above Community Cham- Full Pool Length Year Length Depth Width Project Mouth In Vicinity ber Width Level Upper Lower Type (feet) Opened (miles) (feet) (feet) Lock and Dam No. 5A Lock and Dam No. 5 Lock and Dam No. 4 Lock and Dam No. 3 Lock and Dam No. 2 Lock and Dam No. 1 St. Anthony Falls Lower Lock and Dam St. Anthony Falls Upper Lock and Dam Monongahela River, PA and WV Locks and Dam No. 2 Locks and Dam No. 3 Locks and Dam No. 4 Maxwell Locks and Dam Locks and Dam No. 7 Locks and Dam No. 8 Morgantown Lock and Dam Hidebrand Lock and Dam Opekiska Lock and Dam Ohio River Locks and Dam No. 53 Locks and Dam No. 52 Smithland Locks and Dam Uniontown Locks and Dam Newburgh Locks and Dam Cannelton Locks and Dam McAlpine Locks and Dam Markland Locks and Dam 728.517 Winona, MN 738.117 Minneiska, MN 752.817 Alma, WI 796.917 Red Wing, MN 815.217 Hastings, MN Minneapolis- 847.617 St. Paul, MN 853.317 Minneapolis, MN 853.917 Minneapolis, MN 11.2 Braddock, PA 23.8 Elizabeth, PA 41.5 Monessen, PA 61.2 Maxwell, PA 85.0 Greensboro, PA 90.8 Pbint Marion, PA 102.0 Morgantown, WV 108.0 Morgantown, WV 115.4 Morgantown, WV 18.4 Mound City, IL 42.1 Brookport, IL 35.3 Smithland, KY 135.0 Uniontown, KY 204.9 Newburg, IN 260.2 Cannelton, IN 374.2 Louisville, KY 449.5 Markland, IN 110 600 110 600 110 600 110 600 110 600 500 56 400 56 400 5 18 9 18 7 17 8 17 12 22 12 16 38 13 38 13 13 Movable 12 .Movable 13 Movable 14 Movable 13 Movable 15 8 Fixed 10 56 400 25 14 10 Movable 56 400 49 16 14 Fixed 56 360 110 720 56 360 56 720 56 360 56 720 84 720 84 720 56 360 56 360 84 600 84 600 84 600 110 600 110 1,200 110 600 110 1,200 110 1,200 1,200 110 1,200 600 110 1,200 110 600 110 1,200 110 600 110 1,200 110 600 56 360 110 1,200 110 600 C-5 9 16 9 16 8 12 8 12 17 20 17 20 20 21 20 21 15 11 19 15 17 18 21 14 22 18 12 15 12 15 12 15 12 15 22 34 22 34 22 34 22 34 16 32 16 32 25 38 25 38 37 49 37 19 37 19 35 50 35 50 16 Fixed 16 12 Fixed 12 11 Movable 11 15 Movable 15 10 Fixed 10 Movable 15 Movable 15 Movable 14 Movable 10 Movable Temporary 10 Lock 11 Movable Temporary 11 Lock 12 Movable 12 12 Movable 12 16 Movable 16 - 13 Movable 13 12 Movable .11 11 15 Movable 15 682 1936 1,619 1935 1,367 1935 365 1938 822 1930 1948 574 1932 1917 188 1959 3,584 1963 748 1951 19532 670 1907 1907w 535 1932 1932s 460 1964 1964 610 1925w 560 1925 U 410 1950 530 1959 366 1964 3,978 1929 1981 3,073 1928 1969 3,560 1980 3,516 1975 2,272 1975 1,965 1972 8,627 1961 1921 1930 1,395 1963 1963 9.6 14.7 44.1 18.3 32.4 5.7 0.5 3.8 12.6 17.7 19.7 23.8 5.8 11.2 6.0 7.4 7.0 9 NS 9 NS 9 NS 9 NS 9 NS 9 NS 9 100 9 100 9 300 9 300 9 300 9 300 9 300 9 300 9 300 9 300 9 300 23.7 9 300 35.8 9 300 99.7 69.9 55.4 116.3 75.3 95.3 9 300 9 300 9 300 9 400 9 300 9 300 Capt. Anthony Meldahl Locks and Dam Greenup Locks and Dam Gallipolis Locks and Dam Racine Locks and Dam Belleville Locks and Dam Willow Island Locks and Dam Hannibal Locks and Dam Pike Island Locks and Dam New Cumberland Locks and Dam Montgomery Island Locks and Dam Dashields Locks and Dam Emsworth Locks and Dam Okeechobee Waterway, FL St. Lucie Lock and Dam Moore Haven Lock Ortona Lock and Dam W.P. Franklin Lock and Control Structure Old River, LA Old River Lock Ouachita and Black Rivers, AK & LA Jonesville Lock and Dam (Black Riv.) Columbia Lock and Dam (Black Riv.) Lock and Dam No. 6 (Black Riv.) Lock and Dam No. 8 (Black Riv.) Pearl River, MS and LA Lock 1 Lock 2 Lock 3 Sacramento River, CA Barge Canal Lock Snake River, WA Ice Harbor Lock and Dam Lower Monumental Leck and Dam Little Goose Lock and Dam Lower Granite Lock and Dam St. Marys River, MI South Canal: MacArthur Lock Poe Lock North Canal: Davis Lock Sabin Lock Savannah River, GA New Savannah Bluff Lock and Dam Tennessee River, TN, AL, MS, and KY20 Kentucky Lock and Dam Pickwick Landing Lock and Dam 554.8 Chilo, OH 110. 1,200 110 600 640.0 Greenup, KY 110 1,200 110 600 701.8 Hosgett, WV 110 600 110 360 743.5 Letart Falls, OH 110 1,200 110 600 777.1 Reedsville, OH 110 1,200 110 600 819.3 Waverly, WV 110 1,200 110 600 854.6 New Martinsvl. WV 110 1,200 110 600 896.7 Warwood, WV 110 1,200 110 600 926.6 Stratton, OH 110 1,200 110 600 949.3 Industry, PA 110 600 56 360 967.7 Glenwillard, PA 110 600 56 360 974.8 Emsworth, PA 110 600 56 360 15.1 Stuart, FL 50 250 78.0 Moore Haven, FL 50 250 93.6 LaBelle, FL 50 250 121.4 Fort Myers, FL 56 400 304.0 Simmesport, LA 25.0 Jonesville, LA 117.2 Columbia, LA 223.4 Felsenthal, AR 282.8 Calion, AR 28.719 Pearl River, LA 40.819 Bush, LA 14.019 Sun, LA 30 45 15 Movable 30 45 15 30 45 15 Movable 30 45 15 23 18 15 Movable 23 18 15 22 37 15 Movable 22 37 15 22 37 15 Movable 22 37 15 20 35 15 Movable 20 35 15 21 38 17 Movable 21 38 17 21 17 18 Movable 21 17 18 21 17 15 Movable 21 17 15 18 16 15 Movable 18 16 15 10 13 18 Fixed 10 13 18 18 17 13 Movable 18 16 13 13 14 12 Movable 2 10 11 None 11 12 11 Movable 3 13 Movable 75 1,200 35 11 11 None 84 600 30 84 600 18 55 268 10 55 268 14 65 310 17 65 310 15 65 310 11 42.8 W. Sacramento, CA 86 600 9.7 Pasco, WA 41.6 Kahlotus, WA 70.3 Starbuck, WA 108.0 Pomeroy, WA 86 665 11 86 675 .86 675 86 675 1 47.0 Sault Ste. Marie, MI 80 800 47.0 Sault Ste. Marie, MI 110 1,200 47.0 Sault Ste. Marie, MI 80 1,350 47.0 Sault Ste. Marie, MI 80 1,350 187.2 Augusta, GA 22.4 Gibertsville, KY 110 600 206.7 Hamburg, TN 110 600 14 Tainter 13 Tainter 14 7 Movable 17 7 Movable 10 10 10 10 None 10 None 10 None 4 13 13 None 00 15 15 Movable 98 15 15 Movable 98 15 15 Movable 00 15 15 Movable 22 22 22 22 31 32 24 24 31 None 32 None 23 None 23 None 56 360 15 14 12 Movable 56 11 13 Tainter 55 10 13 . Bulkhead 1,756 1962 1962 1,287 1962 1,132 1937 1,202 1970 1,206 1969 1,128 1973 1,098 1972 1,306 1965 1,315 1961 1,379 1936 1,585 1929 1,717 1921 95.2 61.8 41.7 33.6 36.4 25.3 36.0 29.9 22.7 18.4 7.1 6.2 9 300 "9 300 9 300 9 300 9 300 9 1,000 9 300 9 300 9 300 9 300 9 300 9 300 170 1941 15.1 8 80 1953 15.6 8 90 104 1937 15.6 8 90 1,150 1965 7.9 8 90 1963 12 125 1972 1972 314 1923 306 1926 1951 1951 1951 92.2 9 100 106.2 9 100 59.4 918 100 55.2 918 100 11.1 3.2 13.2 7 80 7 80 7 80 1961 1.5 13 120 2,790 1962 31.9 3,800 1969 28.7 2,655 1970 37.2 3,200 1975 32.0 1943 1968 1914 1919 14 250 14 250 14 250 14 250 27 360 1936 16.2 9 90 7,976 1944 7,385 1937 184.3 9 300 52.7 9 300 C-6 APPENDIX C (Continued) NAVIGATION LOCKS AND DAMS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1981 Locks Dams Authorized Channel Available Width Length Lift at Miles of for Normal Depth on Sills Above Community Cham- Full Pool Length Year Length Depth Width Project Mouth In Vicinity ber Width Level Upper Lower Type' (feet) Opened (miles) (feet) (feet) Wilson Lock and Dam Main Lock 259.4 Florence, AL 110 600 94 13 13 Bulkhead 3,728 1959 15.5 9 300 Auxiliary Lock 259.4 Florence, AL 60 292 94 11 11 Bulkhead 3,728 1927 15.5 9 300 General Joe Wheeler Lock and Dam Main Lock 274.9 Florence, AL 110 600 48 13 13 Bulkhead 5,738 1963 74.1 9 300 Auxiliary Lock 274.9 Florence, AL 60 400 48 15 13 Bulkhead 5,738 1962 74.1 9 300 Gutersville Lock and Dam Main Lock 349.0 Guntersville, AL 110 600 39 13 13 Tinter 3,837 1965 75.7 9 300 Auxiliary Lock 349.0 Guntersville, AL 60 360 39 13 12 Tainter 3,837 1939 75.7 9 300 Nickajack Lock and Dam 424.7 Chattanooga, TN 110 600 39 13 11 Tainter 3,763 1967 46.3 9 300 Chickamauga Lock and Dam 471.0 Chattanooga, TN 60 360 49 10 14 Tainter 5,654 1940 58.9 9 300 Watts Bar Lock and Dam 529.9 Breedenton, TN 60 360 58 12 12 Tainter 2,646 1942 72.4 9 300 Fort Loudon Lock and Dam - 602.3 Lenoir City, TN 60 360 72 12 12 Tainter 3,687 1943 49.8 9 300 Melton Hill Lock and Dam (Clinch River) 23.1 Kingston, TN 75 400 54 13 13 Tinter 1,072 1963 38.2 9 30021 Willamette River at Willamette Falls, OR Lock No. 1 26.0 Oregon City, OR 40 210 20 6 8 None 1872 6 150 Lock No. 2 26.0 Oregon City, OR 40 210 10 6 8 None 1872 Lock No. 3 26.0 Oregon City, OR 40 210 10 6 8 None 1872 Lock No. 4 26.0 Oregon City, OR 40 210 10 6 8 None 1872 4 Guard Lock 26.4 Oregon City, OR 40 210 10 6 8 None 1872 23.6 6 NS 1. Fixed: crest without gates or other facility to control streamflow. Movable: includes any type of crest gates, tainter gates, wickets, or others to control streamflow. 2. Above mouth of Mobile River. 3. Includes length of earth dikes. 4. From mouth of Apalachicola River. 5. From mouth of Chattahoochee River. 6. Above Norfolk, VA 7. With reference to mean low water, or low mean Gulf as case may be. 8. From Gulf Intracoastal Waterway 9. Average high and low water conditions, lift varying widely, depending on tides and river stages. 10. From foot of Government Street, Mobile, AL. 11. From mouth of St. Johns River. 12. Green River Dam 4 failed May 24, 1965, when a portion of the dam washed out. Repairs are deferred pending completion of General Investigations Survey on Green River. 13. Pool of Barren River Dam 1 is maintained for small boat use, but navigation through lock is suspended because of loss of lower pool. 14. Above Head of Passes. 15. From New Orleans, LA. 16. Salt water barrier in down position. Will clear 15-foot vessels in normal position. 17. Above the Ohio River. 18. Channel completed to depth of 6.5 feet. 19. From mouth of West Pearl River. 20. Tennessee River locks operated by the Corps, dams operated by the Tennesee Valley Authority. 21. 300-foot width from lock to mouth of Cinch River and 175-foot width upstream from lock to Clinton, TN. 22. Dates shown represent replacement structures. 23. Date shown represent reconstruction for locks and dams Nos. 2-8 inclusive. 24. Dam was rebuilt in 1959. C-7 APPENDIX D NAVIGATION PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION Fiscal Year Fiscal Placed in Completed or Year Useful Scheduled for Project Started Operation Completion Nature of Project AIWW - Replacement of Federal Hwy Bridges in NC ....................................... Aquatic Plant Control ........................... ......................................... Ashtabula Harbor, OH .................... .......... .................................. Atchafalaya River and Bayou Chene Boeuf and Black, LA .................................. Auasi Small Boat Harbor, American Samoa (Sec. 107) ..................................... Aunuu Harbor, American Samoa (Sec. 107) ................................................ Baltimore Harbor & Channels, MD (1958 Mod.) ............................................ Bar Point Harbor, AK (Sec. 107) ............... ........................................... Berkeley Marina, CA (Sec. 107) ............... ............................................ BiloxHia rbor,M S (Sec. 107) ... ................. ......................................... Brazos Island Harbor, TX (1960 Act) ...................................................... Buffalo Harbor, NY (Sec 107) ................ ............................................. Calumet Harbor & River, IL and IN ...................................................... Calumet-Sag. Mod., Ii Waterway, IL and IN, Part 1 .................. .............. Cannelton Locks and Dam, Ohio River, IN and KY ........................................... Cattaraugus Harbor, NY ................ ................................................. Channel to Newport News, VA (1965 Mod.) ................................................ Cleveland Harbor, OH ....................................... Cooper River, Charleston Harbor, SC ...................................................... Cordova Harbor, AK (Sec 107)...... ............... ........................ Corpus Christi Ship Channel, TX ............................................................ Craig Harbor, AK (Sec 107) .................................................................. Crescent City Harbor, CA ........... ............. ...................................... Delaware River, PA, NJ, and DE, Philadelphia to Sea (Anchorage) ......................... Detour Harbor,-M I .................. ..................................................... Dunkirk Harbor,N Y ............ . .................................................. East Bay Marine, Olympia, WA (Sec 107) ................................................. Elizabeth River, Southern Branch; VA .................................................... Emsworth Locks and Dams, Ohio River, PA ............................................... Dresden Island Lock and Dam Illinois Waterway, IL.... ................ .......... Friday Harbor Marina, WA (Sec 107) ..................................................... Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, Chocolate Bayou, TX ......................................... Honolulu Harbor, HI .................. ................................................... Hoonah Harbor, AK ......................... ............................................. Inland Waterway, Delaware River to Chesapeake Bay, DE and M D, Part II ....... .......................................... Island End River, Chelsea MA (See 107) ...................................................... Kaskaskia River, IL .......... ............................................................ Kenmore Navigation Channel, WA (Sec 107) ................................................ "Little River InletN,C and SC ................................................................ Lock and Dam 26 Replace IL-MO ............................................................ 1974 1959 1981 1974 1978 1978 1961 1979 1980 1979 1979 1981 1964 1955 1962 1981 1967 1979 1977 1981 1972 1980 1970 1964 1980 1979 1981 1979 1980 1980 1981 1980 1979 1979 1962 1981 1966 1980 1981 1980 1981 1980 1980 1980 1980 1966 1968 1966 1968 1980 1981 1981 1974 1981 Indefinite Indefinite 1983 1981 1981 Indefinite 1981 1980 1983 1980 1982 Indefinite Indefinite 1982 1983 Indefinite 1981 1984 1982 1987 1982 1983 Indefinite 1982 1981 1983 1980 1984 1983 1983 1981 1981 1981 Indefinite 1982 1986 1981 1984 1989 Replacement of existing bridges Control and eradication of aquatic plants Rehabilitation of breakwater Dredging Dredging and breakwater Dredging and breakwater Dredging Floating breakwater Breakwater Dredging Dredging Removal bridge abutment Dredging and channel, widening and deepening Channel improvements and relocation Replacement of existing locks and Dams 43-45 inclusive Breakwaters and berm Deep draft channel widening and deepening, deferred anchorage construction Rehabilitation of breakwater Rediversion of river and powerhouse construction Breakwater Dredging Breakwaters Dredging and breakwater Dredging Dredging and breakwater Dredging and breakwater Dredging and breakwater Dredging Major rehabilitation of locks and dams Major rehabilitation of locks and dams Breakwater Dredging Dredging Breakwater and dredging Dredging and bridge const. Dredging Lock, dam and channel Channel. Dredging and jetties Replace existing structure D-1 APPENDIX D (Continued) NAVIGATION PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION Fiscal Year Fiscal Placed in Completed or Year Useful Scheduled for Project Started Operation Completion Nature of Project Locks and Dam 52, IL and KY ................... .............. .... ......... Locks and Dam 53 (Tem. Lock), IL and KY ............................................. Locks and Dam 53, IL and KY .......................... .................................... Los Angeles - Long Beach Harbors, CA ................................................... Ludington Harbor, MI ........................................ Manitowac Harbor, WI .... ..... ... ............................................ Masonboro Inlet Jetties (AIWW-Wilmington Dist.) NC ..................................... McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System ...................................... McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System ........................................... Metlakatla Harbor, AK . ....................................... Mississippi River between Ohio and Missouri Rivers........................................ Mississippi River between Missouri River & Minneapolis, MN ................................. Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, MN ........................ Mississippi River, Gulf Outlet, LA ........................................................... Mississippi River Outlets, Venice, LA ..................................................... Missouri River, Sioux City, IA to mouth ...................................................... Mobile Harbor (Theodore Channel) ......................................................... Mohohgahela River Locks and Dam 3, PA .................................................... Murrells Inlet, SC ....................................................................... Multonomah Channel, OR (Sec 107) .......................................................... New York Harbor, NY and NJ ........................................................... Newark Bay, Hackensack and Passaic Rivers, NJ ............................................ Newburgh Locks and Dam, Ohio River, IN and KY ........................................... Norfolk Harbor Channel, VA (1965 Mod.).... ..................................... Ouachita and Black River, AR and LA.. ........................................... Overton-Red River Waterway, LA ........................................................ Pohoiki Bay, HI (Sec. 107) ... ..... ....................................................... Port Everglades Harbor, FL ........................................ Port Lions Harbor, AK (Sec 107) ............................................................ Port W ashington, W I .......... ........................................................... Red River Emergency Bank Protection ........................................ Red River WW, Mississippi River to Shreveport, LA ....................................... Rock Hall Harbor, M D .......... ......................................................... San Diego River and Mission Bay, CA ........................................................ (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels) ................................... Santa Cruz Harbor, CA ......... .......................................... ..... 1979 1974 1979 1980 1977 1981 1977 1950 1963 1979 1910 1978 1979 1958 1977 1912 1979 1978 1977 1981 1976 1970 1965 1966 1964 1968 1978 1979 1979 1979 1973 1974 1981 1948 1971 1962 1980 1980 1968 1981 1980 1981 1981 Incremental 1980 1969 1967 1980 1984 1982 1984 1983 1981 1983 1981 1979 1985 1981 1992 1981 1983 1984 1980 1981 1982 1981 1981 1982 1993 1981 1983 Indefinite 1983 1981 1979 1982 1981 1980 1982 1988 1982 Indefinite 1991 Indefinite Major rehabilitation of locks and dam Temporary lock Major rehabilitation of locks and dam Dredging Dredging and breakwater Dredging and breakwater Jeties and mitigation Bank stabilization Locks and dams Breakwater and dredging Regulating works Rehabilitation of old Lock No. 14 at LeClaire, IA Rehabilitation of Lock and Dam No. 1 Breakwaters and seawall Dredging channel and jetties Navigation and bank stabilization completewildlife mitigation awaiting authorization Dredging Major rehabilitation of locks and dam Jetties and dredging Dredging Collection and removal of drift Dredging Replacement of existing locks and dams 46 and 47 Deep draft channel, deepening and deferred anchorage const. Replacement of existing lock and dams 3, 4, 5, 6, and 8 Bank stabilization Breakwater Dredging Breakwaters Dredging and breakwater Bank protection Channel improvement and realignment Dredging and breakwater Dredging and breakwater Deep draft channel, widening, deepening and dredging Sand bypassing plant D-2 APPENDIX D (Continued) NAVIGATION PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION Fiscal Year Fiscal Placed in Completed or Year Useful Scheduled for Project Started Operation Completion Nature of Project Smithland Locks and Dam, IL, IN, and KY ................ ............ ............... Squalicum, Bellingham, WA (Sec 107) ........................................................ St. Lucie Inlet, FL ................................................................. Starved Rock Lock and Dam, Illinois Waterway, IL .......................................... Tampa Harbor, FL (Main Channel) ........ ............................................... Tau Harbor, American Samoa (Sec. 107) .................................................. Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway, AL and MS ........................................ Texas City Channel, TX (Industrial Canal) ....... ........................................... Two Harbors, M N .......................................................................... Uniontown Locks and Dam, Ohio River, IN and KY ........................................... Waianae Small Boat Harbor, Oahu, HI ....................................... W allisville Lake, TX ........................................................................ West Harbor, OH .................................................................... Willow Island Locks and Dam, Ohio River, OH and WV ....................................... Wallisville Lake, TX .......................................................... W est Harbor, OH .......................................................................... Willow Island Locks and Dam, Ohio River, OH and WV ....................................... .1971 1976 1979 1980 1976 1977 1973 1980 1979 1965 1977 1967 1981 1967 1967 1981 1967 1980 1981 1970 1972 1972 1978 1981 1982 1983 * 1985 1981 1986 1982 1980 1982 1979 Indefinite 1983 1983 Indefinite 1983 1983 Replacement of existing locks and dams 50 and 51 Small boat harbor Dredging, jetties and breakwaters Major rehabilitation of lock and dam Dredging Dredging and breakwater Dredging and locks and dams Dredging Dredging Replacement of locks and dams 48 and 49 Dredging and breakwater Multipurpose lake (navigation, salinity control, water supply, fish and wildlife, and recreation) Breakwaters Replacement of locks and dams 15-17 Multipurpose lake (navigation, salinity control, water supply, fixh and wildlife, and recreation) Breakwaters Replacement of locks and dams 15-17 D-3 APPENDIX E MULTIPURPOSE PROJECTS INCLUDING POWER IN OPERATION Flood Control and/or Nay. Total Feature Storage Placed in Existing Scheduled Ultimate Community Capabibility Useful Oper- Initial Installation Installation Installation Project Height Length Project River in Vicinity (acre-feet)1 ation CY In FY (KW) (KW) (KW) Functions Type2 (Feet) (Feet) Albeni Falls, ID Allatoona Lake, GA Barkley Dam & Barkley, Lake, KY & TN Beaver Lake, AR Big Bend Dam (Lake Sharpe), SD Blakely Mountain Dam- Lake Ouachita, AR Bonneville Lake & Dam L. Bonneville, OR & WA Broken Bow Lake, OK Buford Lake Sidney Lanier, GA Bull Shoals Lake, AR & MO Carters Center Hill Lake, TN Cheatham Lake & Dam, TN Chief Joseph Dam (Rufus Woods Lake), WA Clarks Hill Lake, GA & SC Cordell Hull L&D, TN Cougar Lake, OR Dale Hollow Lake, TN & KY Dardanelle L&D, AR DeGray Lake, AR Denison Dam (Lake Texoma), TX & OK Detroit Lake, OR, including Big Cliff Lake, OR Dworshak Dam & Reservoir, ID Eufaula Lake, OK Fort Gibson Lake, OK Fort Peck Dam Fort Randal Dam (Lake Francis Case) SD Garrison Dam (Lake Sakakawea), ND Gavin's Point Dam (Lewis & Clark Lake), SD & NE Green Peter Lake, OR, including Foster Lake, OR Greers Ferry Lake, AR Hartwell Lake, GA & SC Pend Oreille Newport, WA 1,153,000 Etowah Cartersville, GA 670,000 Cumberland Grand Rivers KY 2,082,000 White Eureka Springs, AR 1,952,000 Missouri Chamberlin, SD 1,910,000 Ouachita Hot Springs, AR 2,768,000 Columbia Bonneville, OR 537,000 Mountain Fork Broken Bow, OK 1,368,000 Chattahoochee Buford, GA 2,554,000 White Mountain Home, AR 5,408,000 Coosawattee Carters, GA 472,756 Caney Fork Lancaster, TN 2,092,000 Cumberland Ashland City, TN 104,000 Columbia Bridgeport, WA 518,000 Savannah Augusta, GA 2,900,000 Cumberland Carthage, TN 310,000 South Fork, McKenzie Blue River, OR 219,000 Obey Celina, TN 1,706,000 Arkansas Dardanelle, AR 486,200 Caddo Arkadelphia, AR 831,000 Red Denison, TX 5,312,300 North Santiam Mill City, OR 461,000 North Fork, Cleanwater Orofino, ID 3,468,000 Canadian Eufaula, OK 3,798,000 Grand (Neosho) Ft. Gibson, OK 1,284,400 Missouri Glasgow, MT 8,900,000 Missouri Lake Andes, SD . 5,700,000 Missouri Missouri Middle Santiam Little Red Savannah Riverdale, ND Yankton, SD Sweet Home, OR Heber Springs Hartwell, GA 4,200,000 520,000 491,000 2,844,000 2,842,000 1952 1955 42,600 1950 1950 74,000 1964 1963 1964 1953 1938 1968 1956 1951 1975 1948 1952 1955 1952 1973 1963 1943 1969 1969 1944 1953 1972 1964 1950 1938 1953 42,600 NFPR C 90 1,055 74,000 FPRW C 190 1,250 1966 130,000 130,000 NPFR CE 157 9,959 1965 112,000 112,000 FPSR CE 228 2,575 1965 468,000 468,000 NFPRIW E 95 10,570 1956 75,000 75,000 FPRWN E 235 1,100 1938 651,000 425,2004 1,076,000 NPR C 122 2,690 1970 100,000 100,000 FPWSR E 225 2,750 1957 86,000 86,000 NFPW E 192 5,400 1952 340,000 340,000 FPR C 258 2,256 1975 500,000 500,000 FPRW ER 450 1,950 1951 135,000 135,000 FPR CE 250 2,160 1958 36,000 36,000 NPR C 75 801 1956 2,069,000 204,2005 2,273,200 PIR C 220 4,300 1953 280,000 280,000 NFPRS CE 200 5,680 1973 100,000 100,000 NPR CE 93 1,306 1964 25,000 64,500 NFPRI ER 445 1,738 1949 54,000 54,000 FPR C 200 1,717 1965 124,000 124,000 NPR C 68 2,683 1972 68,000 40,000 108,000 FNPRSA E 263 3,400 1945 70,000 70,000 FPSRN E 165 17,200 1954 118,000 118,000 NFPRI C 382 1,528 1973 400,000 1,060,000 PNFR C 717 3,287 1964 90,000 90,000 FNPSR E 114 3,200 1953 45,000 67,000 FPR CE 110 2,900 1944 165,000 165,000 NFPROW E 251 21,026 1954 320,000 320,000 NFPRIW E 165 10,700 1954 1956 400,000 1956 1957 100,000 1967 1967 100,000 1962 1964 96,000 1961 1962 264,000 ' 400,000 NFPRIW E 202 11,300 100,000 NFPRIW E 74 8,700 100,000 PFNIR C 340 1,380 96,000 FPRS C 243 1,704 344,000 NFPRS CE 204 17,852 E-1 APPENDIX E (Continued) MULTIPURPOSE PROJECTS INCLUDING POWER IN OPERATION Flood Control and/or Nay. Total Feature Storage Placed in Existing Scheduled Ultimate Community Capabibility Useful Oper- Initial Installation Installation Installation Project Height Length Project River in Vicinity (acre-feet)1 ation CY In FY ' (KW) (KW) (KW) Functions Type 2 (Feet) (Feet) Hills Creek Lake, OR Ice Harbor Lake & Dam (Lake Sacajawea), WA Jim Woodruff Dam (Lake Seminole), FL, GA & AL John Day L&D (Lake Umatilla), OR & WA John H. Kerr Dam & Reservoir, NC & VA Jones Bluff L&D, AL J. Percy Priest Dam & Reservoir, TN Keystone Lake, OK Laurel River Lake, KY Libby Dam, Lake Koocanusa, MT Little Goose Lake & Dam (Lake Bryan), WA Lookout Point Lake, including Dexter Lake, OR Lost Creek Lake, OR Lower Granite L&D, WA Lower Monumental Lake & Dam, WA McNary Lake & Dam- Lake Wallula, OR & WA Millers Ferry L&D, AL Narrows Dam- Lake Greeson, AR New Melones Lake, CA7 Norfolk Lake, AR & MO Oahe Dam (Lake Oahe), SD & ND Old Hickory L&D, TN Ozark-Jeta Taylor L&D, AR Philpott Lake, VA Robert S. Kerr Lake & Dam and Reservoir, OK Sam Rayburn Dam & Reservoir, TX St. Mary's River, MI Snettisham, AK8 Stockton Lake, MO Middle Fork Willainette Snake Appalachicola Columbia Roanoke Alabama Stones Arkansas Laurel Kootenai Snake Middle Fork, Willamette Rogue Snake Snake Columbia Alabama Little Missouri Stanislaus North Fork Missouri Cumberland Arkansas Roanoke Arkansas Angelina Great Lakes Speel Sac Oakridge, OR Pasco, WA Chattahoochee, FL Rufus, OR Boydton, VA Benton, AL Nashville, TN Tulsa, OK London, KY Libby, MT Starbuck, WA Lowell, OR Trail, OR Pomercy, WA Kahlotus, WA Umatilla, OR Camden, AL Murfreesboro, AR Oakdale, CA Norfork, AR Pierre, SD Hendersonville, TN Ozark, AR Bassett, VA Sallisaw, OK Jasper, TX Sault Ste. Marie, MI Juneau, AK Stockton, MO 356,000 417,000 367,000 2,500,000 2,750,300 234,000 652,000 1,836,000 435,000 2,000,000 565,000 483,000 465,000 484,000 376,000 1,550,000 331,000 407,000 2,400,000 1,983,000 23,500,000 545,000 148,400 318,000 493,000 3,997,600 352,400 1,674,000 1961 1962 1957 1968 1952 1972 1967 1964 1973 1972 1970 1954 1977 1975 1969 1953 1969 1950 1978 1943 1959 1954 1969 1951 1970 1965 1855 1969 E-2 1962 30,000 30,000 NFPRI GE 304 2,150 1962 603,000 603,000 NPRI CE 123 2,790 1957 30,000 30,000 NPRW CE 67 6,150 1968 2,160,000 2,700,000 NPRFI CE 161 5,900 1953 204,000 204,000 FPAR CE 144 22,285 1975 68,000 68,000 NPRW CE 101 14,962 1970 28,000 28,000 FPRW CE 147 2,716 1968 70,000 70,000 FNPWSR E 121 4,600 1978 61,000 61,000 FPRW R 282 1,420 1976 420,000 420,000 840,000 FPR C 420 '3,055 1970 810,000 810,000 NPRI CE 160 2,655 1955 135,000 135,000 NFPRI CE 243 3,381 1977 49,000 49,000 DFPISWR CE 345 3,600 1975 810,000 810,000 NPRIF CE 157 3,200 1969 810,000 810,000 NPRI CE 155 3,800 1954 980,000 645,0006 1,625,000 NFPRI CE 110 7,365 1970 75,000 75,000 NPRW CE 90 11,380 1950 25,500 25,500 FPRW C 183 .5941 1979 300,000 300,000 FIPRW ER 625 1,560 1944 80,550 163,000 FPRS C 216 2,624 1962 595,000 595,000 NFPRIW E 245 9,300 1957 100,000 100,000 NPR CE 98 3,605 1973 100,000 100,000 NPR C 58 2,480 1954 14,000 14,000 FPAR C 220 892 1972 110,000 110,000 NPR E 75 7,230 1966 52,000 52,000 FPWR CE 120 19,430 1952 18,400 18,400 NP Control Gate 1973 46,700 27,0009 73,700 P C1� 18 338 1973 45,200 45,200 FPRW CE 128 5,100 APPENDIX E (Continued) MULTIPURPOSE PROJECTS INCLUDING POWE*R IN OPERATION Flood Control and/or Nav. Total Feature Storage Placed in Existing Scheduled Ultimate Community Capabibility Useful Oper- Initial Installation Installation Installation Project Height Length Project River in Vicinity (acre-feet)1 ation CY In FY (KW) (KW) (KW) Functions Type2 (Feet) (Feet) Table Rock Lake, AR & MO White Branson, MO 3,462,000 1958 1959 200,000 200,000 FPR CE 252 6,423 Tenkiller Lake, OK Illinois Gore, OK 1,230,800 1952 1954 34,000 39,100 FPR E 197 4,350 The Dalles Lake & Dam (Lake Celilo), WA & OR Columbia The Dalles, OR 53,000 1957 1957 1,807,000 1,807,000 NPR CR 300 8,875 Walter F. George Lake & Dam, GA & FL Chattahoochee Fort Gaines, GA 934,000 1963 1963 130,000 130,000 NPRW CE 114 13,585 Webbers Falls L&D, OK Arkansas Webbers Falls, OK 165,000 1970 1974 60,000 60,000 NPR E 84 4,370 West Point Lake, AL & GA Chattahoochee West Point, GA 604,500 ' 1975 1975 73,375 108,375 FPRW CE 97 7,250 Whitney Lake, TX Brazos Whitney, TX 1,999,500 1953 1954 30,000 30,000 FPR CE 159 17,694 Wolf Creek Dam (Lake Cumberland), KY Cumberland Jamestown, KY 6,089,000 1950 1952 270,000 270,000 FPR CE 258 5,736 1 'btal of all storage functions, including inactive and dead storage to normal full pool level 2 G: gravel; R: rock; C: concrete; E: earth 3 Above streambed 4 Bonneville Second Powerhouse 5 Chief Joseph Additional Units and Uprating of Units 116 6 McNary Second Powerhouse Units 7 Being operated for the Department of Interior by the Bureau of Reclamation 8 Being operated by the Alaska Power Administration 9 Crater Lake Unit 10 Weir for Long Lake Nomenclature for Project Functions A -Low Flow Augmentation D -Debris Control F -Flood Control I -Irrigation N -Navigation P -Power R -Public Recreation (Annual Attendance exceeding 5,000) S -Water Supply W-Fish and Wildlife (Federal or State) E-3 APPENDIX F MULTIPURPOSE PROJECTS INCLUDING POWER UNDER CONSTRUCTION SEPTEMBER 30, 1981 Nameplate Capacity Fiscal " Scheduled Scheduled Year for for Scheduled Ultimate Project Started Operation Completion Functions Installation Installation Bonneville Second Power House, OR and WA ................................. 1974 1981 1986 PR 558200 558,200 Clarence Cannon Dam, Salt River, MO .. ................................... 1966 1985 1988 FSRPW 58,000 58,000 Harry S. Truman Dam and Reservoir, Osage River, MO ......................... 1965 1982 Indefinite FRPRW 160,000 160,000 Libby Additional Units 5-8, MT ............................................. 1976 1984 1984 P 420,000 420,000 Richard B. Russell Dam and Lake, Savannah River, GA and SC .................. 1975 1986 1987 FRP 600,000 600,000 St. Stephens, Cooper River, SC .. ............................................ 1977 1983 1983 NWD . . .-84,000 84,000 KEY D - Redevelopment F - Flood Control I - Irrigation N - Navigation P - Power R - Recreation S - Water Supply W - Fish and Wildlife F-1 Flood Damages Prevented by Corps Projects By Districts (in thousands of dollars) District Memphis New Orleans St. Louis Vicksburg Kansas City Omaha New England Baltimore New York Norfolk Philadelphia Buffalo Chicago Detroit Rock Island St. Paul Alaska Portland Seattle Walla Walla Huntington Lousiville Nashville Pittsburgh Pacific Ocean Charleston Jacksonville Mobile Savannah Wilmington Los Angeles Sacramento San Francisco Albuquerque Fort Worth Galveston Little Rock Tulsa TOTAL Cumulative During FY 81 through FY 81 3,002 2,079 11,622 0 24,780 65,082 52,366 12,108 13,926 0 0 8,783 0 491 0 0 4,473 587,031 40,895 5,090 78,752 74,934 4,209 73,536 220 146 815 162 638 738 120 0 560 900 49,610 33,826 5,526 4,066 1,160,486 *Revised Figures 1Adjustment in Boundaries of Charleston and Wilmington Districts 'Includes 2 Projects previously in New Orleans District 3Includes 4 Projects transferred from Tulsa District (De Queen, Dierks, Gillham and Millwood) G-1 4,969,508 40,983,434 1,055,069 21,664,977 3,943,378 1,499,523* 695,102 2,307,386 92,117* 5,532 25,252 375,787* 45,444 31,097 506,502 271,122 21,792 3,592,343 221.585 76,203 3,030,293 898,042* 428,205 2,751,821 10,087 3,177 1 490,460 205,872* 14,030 131,274*1 6,352,953 1,929,925 57,181 218,612 1,076,802 345,263 267,946 2 826,002 3 101,421,098 Flood Damages Prevented by Corps Projects By Region (in thousands of dollars) Cumulative Region During FY 81 through FY 81 New England 53,661 708,754* Mid-Atlantic 24,171 2,401,428* Gulf and South Atlantic 2,499 844,813* Ohio 231,431 7,098,875* Tennessee 0 9,486 Great Lakes 9,842 426,284* Upper Mississippi 11,622 1,688,212 Souris-Red-Rainy 0 185,732 Missouri 89,862 5,442,901 Arkansas-Red-White 11,617 2,089,085 Lower Mississippi 3,067 66,695,329 Rio Grande- 889 146,065 Texas and Gulf 83,436 1,422,065 Colorado 0 312,331 Great Basin 0 3,525 California 680 8,024,203 Columbia-North Pacific 633,016 3,890,131 Alaska 4,473 21,792 Hawaii 220 10,087 TOTAL 1,160, 486 101,421,098 *Revised Figures G-2 INDEX The following abbreviations are used in the index: LMK LMM LMN LMS MR+T MRK MRO NAB NAN NAO NAP NCB NCC NCD NCE NCR NCS NED NPA NPP VICKSBURG, MISS., DISTRICT MEMPHIS, TENN., DISTRICT NEW ORLEANS, LA., DISTRICT ST. LOUIS, MO., DISTRICT MISSISSIPPI, RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES PROJECT KANSAS CITY, MO., DISTRICT OMAHA, NEBR., DISTRICT BALTIMORE, MD., DISTRICT NEW YORK, N.Y., DISTRICT NORFOLK, VA., DISTRICT PHILADELPHIA, PA., DISTRICT BUFFALO, N.Y., DISTRICT CHICAGO, ILL., DISTRICT MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS, MINN. DETROIT, MICH., DISTRICT ROCK ISLAND, ILL, DISTRICT ST. PAUL, MINN., DISTRICT NEW ENGLAND DIVISION ALASKA DISTRICT PORTLAND, OREG., DISTRICT A Aberdeen, Ohio (ORH) 25-21, 25-27 Aberdeen Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-25 Abilene, Kans. (MRK) 20-21, 20-22, 20-23 Abiquiu Dam, N. Mex. (SWA) 17-5, 17-12, 17-15 Absecon Creek, N.J. (NAP) 3-28 Absecon Inlet, N.J. (NAP) 3-2, 3-21, 3-24 Accontink Creek, Va. (NAB) 4-33 Adams, Mass. (NAN) 2-37 Adams Creek, S.C. (SAN) 7-8, 7-17 Adams Levee, Ind. (ORL) 24-29 Addicks Dam, Tex. (SWG) 15-37 Addison, N.Y. (NAB) 4-13, 4-24, 4-37, 4-38 Adena, Ohio (Short Creek) (ORP) 26-21, 26-24 Adkin Branch, NC. (SAW) 6-7, 6-16 Afono Area and AOA Area, American Samoa (POD) 36-13 Agana Small Boat Harbor, Guam (POD) 36-12 Ala Wai Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-12 Alabama Bayou, La. (MR+T) 42-24 NPS NPW ORD ORH ORL ORN ORP POD SAJ SAM SAN SAS SAW SPK SPL SPN SWA SWF SWG SWL SWT SEATTLE, WASH., DISTRICT WALLA WALLA, WASH., DISTRICT OHIO RIVER DIVISION HUNTINGTON, W. VA., DISTRICT LOUISVILLE, KY., DIVISION NASHVILLE, TENN., DISTRICT PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT PACIFIC OCEAN DIVISION JACKSONVILLE, FLA., DISTRICT MOBILE, ALA., DISTRICT CHARLESTON, S.C., DISTRICT SAVANNAH, GA., DISTRICT WILMINGTON, N.C., DISTRICT SACRAMENTO, CALIF., DISTRICT LOS ANGELES, CALIF., DISTRICT SAN FRANCISCO, CALIF., DISTRICT ALBUQUERQUE, N. MEX., DISTRICT FORT WORTH, TEX., DISTRICT GALVESTON, TEX., DISTRICT LITTLE ROCK, ARK., DISTRICT TULSA, OKLA., DISTRICT Alabama River at Montgomery, Ala. (SAM) 10-44 Alabama-Coosa Rivers, Ala. and Ga. (SAM) 10-19, 10-31, 10-40, 10-46 Alameda Creek, Calif. (SPN) 34-20 Alamo Lake, Ariz. (SPL) 33-7, 33-18, 33-23 Alamogordo Diversion Channel, Tularosa (Closed) Basin, N. Mex. (SWA) 17-15 Albermarle and Chesapeake Canal (Great Bride, Va.) (NAO) 5-23 Albeni Falls Dam, Idaho (NAS) 38-12, 38-19, 38-24 Albuquerque Diversion Channels, N. Mex. (SWA) 17-1, 17-12 Alford, Mass. (NED) 1-45, 1-47 Algoma Harbor, Wis. (NCE) 31-2, 31-44, 31-58 Alhambra Creek, Calif. (SPN) 34-9, 34-14, 34-18 Aliso Creek Dam, Calif. (SPL) 33-30 Allatoona Lake, Ga. (SAM) 10-22, 20-31, 10-40 Allegany, N.Y. Unit II (Five Mile Creek Area) (ORP) 26-21, 26-24 Allegany, N.Y. Unit I (Allegheny River) (ORP) 26-21, 26-24 Allegheny River, Pa. (ORP) 26-1, 26-13, 26-16, 26-18 Allegheny River, Pa., Open-Channel Work (ORP) 26-20 Allentown, Pa. (NAP) 3-30 Allenville, Ariz. (SPL) 33-7, 33-18, 33-23 I-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 Alley Bay, Beals, Maine (NED) 1-47 Alloway Creek, N.J. (NAP) 3-28 Alluvial Valley Mapping (MR+T) 42-3 Alma Harbor, Wis. (NCD) 29-9 Almond Lake, N.Y. (NAB) 4-13, 4-24, 4-36, 4-37 Alomond Village, N.Y. (NAB) 4-38, 4-40 Aloha-Rigolette Area, Grant and Rapides Parishes, La. (LMN) 11-41, 11-42 Alpena Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-79 Alpine Dam, Rockford, Ill. (NCR) 28-13 Alpine, Texas (SWA) 17-15 Alsea River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-42 Altamaha, Oconee, and Ocmulgee Rivers, Ga. (SAS) 8-1, 8-12, 8-13 Alteration of Berwick Bay Bridge (LMN) 11-38 Alternative for Sugar Hill Reservoir (NED) 1-50 Alton, Ind. (ORL) 24-29 Altus Reservoir, Okla. (SWT) 19-11 Alum Creek Lake, Ohio (ORH) 25-5, 25-16 Alvin R. Bush Dam, Pa. (NAB) 4-17, 4-25 Amazon Creek, Oreg. (NPP) 37-50 Ambrose Channel, New York Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-34 American Lake, Vicinity of Fort Lewis, Wash. (NPS) 38-28 American River, Calif. (SPK) 35-23 Ames Lake, Iowa (NCR) 28-15 Amesbury, Mass. (NED) 1-22, 1-46, 1-47 Amite River, La. (MR+T) 42-13 Amite River and Bayou Manchac, La. (LMN) 11-38 Amite River and Tributaries, La. (LMN) 11-42 Amsterdam, Ohio (ORP) 26-23, 26-24 Anacortes Harbor, Wash, (NPS) 38-2, 38-15, 38-20 Anacortes Navigation Channel, Wash. (NPS) 38-27 Anacostia River and Flats (NAB) 4-33 Anacostia River and Tributaries, Flood Protection and Navigation Improvements, D.C. and Md. (NAB) 4-40 Anacostia River and Tributaries, Md. (NAB) 4-40 Anaheim Bay Harbor, Orange County, Calif. (SPL) 33-26 Anahuac Channel, Tex. (SWG) 15-8 Anchorage Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-1, 40-8, 40-10 Anclote River, Fla. (SAJ) 9-49, 9-50 Anderson, Ind. (ORL) 24-35 Anderson Park, Newport News, Va. (NAO) 5-23 Andover Lake, Conn. (NED) 1-50 Andrews, George W., Lock and Dam, Ala. and Ga. (SAM) 10-24, 10-32, 10-41 Andrews River, Mass. (NED) 1-2, 1-24, 1-33 Angler-Use Sites, Meramec Basin, Mo. (LMS) 14-17 Annapolis Harbor, Md. (NAB) 4-33 Annisquam River, Mass. (NED) 1-37 Ansonia, Conn. (NED) 1-22, 1-45, 1-47 Anthony Shoals Dam and Lake, Ga. (SAS) 8-18 Apalachee Bay, Fla. to New Orleans, La. (SAM) 10-36 Apalachicola Bay, Fla. (SAM) 10-2, 10-28, 10-33 Apalachicola Bay to St. Marks River, Fla. (SAM) 10-36 Apalachicola, Chattahoochee and Flint Rivers, Ala. Ga. and Fla. (SAM) 10-22, 10-31, 10-40, 10-47 Apalachicola River to St. Andrew Bay, Fla. (SAM) 10-36 Apoon Mouth of Yukon River, Alaska (NPA) 40-12 Applegate Lake, Oreg. (NPP) 37-16, 37-28, 37-38 Appleton First Lock, Wis. (NCE) 31-78 Appleton Fourth Lock, Wis. (NCE) 31-78 Appleton Lower Dam, Wis. (NCE) 31-78 Appleton Second Lock, Wis. (NCE) 31-78 Appleton Third Lock, Wis. (NCE) 31-78 Appomattox River, Va. (NAO) 5-15 Apponaug Cove, R.I. (NED) 1-38 Appoquinimink River, Del. (NAP) 3-28 Aquashicola Reservoir, Pa. (NAP) 3-30 Aquatic Plant Control Buffalo, N.Y., District (NCB) 32-38 Charleston, S.C., District (SAN) 7-2, 7-11, 7-13, 7-17 Galveston, Tex., District (SWG) 15-2, 15-13, 15-28 Jacksonville, Fla., District (SAJ) 9-2, 9-14, 9-29, 9-31, 9-35, 9-50 Mobile, Ala., District (SAM) 10-3, 10-28, 10-33 New England Division (NED) 1-2, 1-24, 1-33 New Orleans, La., District (LMN) 11-2, 11-24, 11-39 New York, N.Y., District (NAN) 2-2, 2-24, 2-28 Philadelphia, Pa., District (NAP) 3-28 Sacramento, Calif., District (SPK) 35-23 Savannah, Ga., District (SAS) 8-2, 8-12, 8-13, 8-17 Seattle, Wash., District (NPS) 38-8 Southwestern Division (SWG) 15-2, 15-13, 15-17 St. Paul, Minn., District (NCS) 27-22 Wilmington, N.C., District (SAW) 6-21 Aquia Creek, Va. (NAB) 4-33 Aquilla Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-2, 16-14, 16-18 Ararat River, Surry County, N.C. (SAW) 6-25 Arbuckle Reservoir, Okla. (SWT) 19-11 Arcadia, Wis. (NCS) 27-20 Arcadia Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-3, 31-44, 31-58 Arcadia Lake, Okla. (SWT) 19-4, 19-15, 19-20 Arch Creek, Fla. (SAJ) 9-57 Archers Creek, S.C. (SAN) 7-17 Ardsley, N.Y. (NAN) 2-14, 2-26, 2-31 Area East of Albany, Oreg. (NPP) 37-50 Arecibo Harbor, P.R. (SAJ) 9-2, 9-29, 9-35 Argyle, Minn., Middle River (NCS) 27-22 Arkabutla Lake, Miss. (MR+T) 42-18, 42-55 Arkansas-Red River Basins Chloride Control, Okla. and Tex. (SWT) 19-5, 19-15, 19-20, 19-22, 19-23, 19-27 Arkansas River Basin, Ark. Okla. & Kans. (SWL) (SWT) 18-2, 18-8, 18-11, 18-13, 18-16, 19-3, 19-22 Arkansas River, North Bank (MR+T) 42-51 Arkansas River Project Levees (MR+T) 42-51 Arkansas River, South Bank (MR+T) 42-51 Arkansas River Standard Revetments and Dikes (MR+T) 42-34 Arkansas River Plan, Okla. (SWT) 19-23 Arkport Dam, N.Y. (NAB) 4-13, 4-24, 4-36, 4-37 Arlington, Alkali Canyon, Oreg. (NPP) 37-50 Arlington Lake, Mo. (MRK) 20-23 Armuchee Creek, Ga. (SAM) 10-45 Ashland, Ky. (ORH) 25-21, 25-26, 25-27 Ashland Harbor, Wis. (NCE) 31-3, 31-44, 31-58 Ashley River, S.C. (SAN) 7-17 Ashtabula Harbor, Ohio (NCB) 32-2, 32-21, 32-26 Asotin Dam, Idaho and Wash. (NPW) 39-21 Astoria Turning Basin, Oreg. (NPP) 37-42 Atchafalaya Basin Floodway (MR+T) 42-40, 42-46, 45-54 Atchafalaya River and Bayous Chene, Boeuf, and Black, La. (LMN) 11-2, 11-24, 11-29 Atchalafaya River Basin, La. (MR+T) 42-4, 42-11,42-25, 42-52, 42-54 Atchafalaya River, Morgan City to Gulf of Mexico, La. (LMN) 11-3, 11-24, 11-29 Atchalafaya River, Standard Revetments (MR+T) 42-29, 42-34 Atchison, Kans. (MRK) 20-23 Athalia, Ohio (ORH) 25-21, 25-27 Athens, Ohio (ORH) 25-26, 25-27 Atlantic Beach Channels, N.C. (SAW) 6-21, 6-22 Atlantic City, N.J. (NAP) 3-29 Atlantic Coast of N.J. Sandy Hook to Barnegat Inlets (NAN) 2-36 Atlantic Gulf Ship Canal, Fla. (SAJ) 9-50 Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway between Norfolk, Va. and St. Johns River, Fla. (NAO) (SAW) (SAN) (SAJ) 5-2, 5-16, 5-19, 5-23, 5-24, 6-2, 6-15, 6-18, 7-2, 7-11, 7-13, 8-3, 8-12, 8-13, 9-2, 9-29, 9-35 I-2 INDEX Au Sable Harbor, Mich (NCE) 31-79 Auasi Harbor, American Samoa (POD) 36-1, 36-7 Aubrey Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-9, 16-15, 16-19 Auburn, N.Y., Owasco Outlet (NCB) 32-41 August Levee, Kans. (SWT) 19-27 Augusta, Ga. (SAS) 8-17 Augusta, Ky. (ORH) 25-21, 25-27 Aunuu Harbor, American Samoa (POD) 36-1, 36-7 Aurora, Ind. (ORL) 24-30, 24-36 Aurora, Westerly Creek-Kelley Road Dam, Col. (MRO) 21-19 Avoca, N.Y. (NAB) 4-13, 4-24, 4-37, 4-38 Avon Harbor, N.C. (SAW) 6-20, 6-21 Aylesworth Creek Lake, Pa. (NAB) 4-12, 4-23, 4-35, 4-36 B B. Everett Jordan Dam and Lake, N.C. (Formerly New Hope Lake, N.C.) (SAW) 6-8, 6-13, 6-16 Back Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-33 Back Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-11 Bad River, Bank Protection, Fort Pierre, S. Dak. (MRO) 21-19 Bagaduce River, Maine (NED) 1-38, 1-50 Bailey, R.D. Lake, W. Va. (ORH) 25-13, 25-18 Bainbridge, N.Y. (NAB) 4-40 Baker Brook, Mass. (NED) 1-50 Bakers Haulover Inlet, Fla. (SAJ) 9-49, 9-50 Ball Mountain Lake, Vt. (NED) 1-13, 1-27, 1-43 Baltimore Harbor, Md. Collection and Removal of Drift (NAB) 4-3, 4-21, 4-26 Baltimore Harbor, Md. Prevention of Obstruction and Injurious Deposits (NAB) 4-4, 4-21, 4-28 Baltimore Harbor and Channels, Md. and Va. (NAB) 4-2, 4-21, 4-26 Baltimore Harbor and Channels (Norfolk District) (NAO) 5-2, 5-16, 5-19, 5-24 Bank Revetments and Dikes (MR+T) 42-27, 42-31, 42-35 Bank Stabilization & Channel Rectification, Ark. (SWL) 18-2, 18-8, 18-17 Bank Stabilization and Channel Rectification, Arkansas River, Ark. and Okla. (SWT) 19-3, 19-15 Bank Stabilization, Red River Below Dennison (SWT) 19-27 Banner Special Drainage and Levee Districts (NCR) 28-13, 28-15 Banning Levee-San Gorgonio River, Calif. (SPL) 33-29, 33-30 Bar Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-38 Bar Point Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-2, 40-8, 40-10 Barataria Bay Waterway, La. (LMN) 11-3, 11-24, 11-29 Barbers Point Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-2, 36-7, 36-9 Barbourville, Ky. (ORN) 23-19 Barcelona Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 32-2, 32-21 Bardwell Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-3, 16-14, 16-18 Barker Dam, Tex. (SWG) 15-37 Barkley Dam and Lake Barkley, Ky. and Tenn. (ORN) 23-20 Barnard, Kans. (MRK) 20-23 Barnegat Inlet, N.J. (NAP) 3-2, 3-21, 3-24 Barnegat Light, N.J. (NAP) 3-29 Barnett Creek, Ky. (ORL) 24-29 Barre Falls Dam, Mass. (NED) 1-13, 1-28, 1-44 Barren River Lake, Ky. (ORL) 24-6, 24-19, 24-32 Bartley, Nebr. (MRK) 20-21, 20-22, 20-23 Bass Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-38 Bass Harbor Bar, Maine (NED) 1-38 Bassett Creek, Minn. (NCS) 27-3, 27-13 Bastrop Bayou, Tex. (SWG) 15-28 Batavia and Vicinity, N.Y. (NCB) 32-41 Bath, N.Y. (NAB) 4-37, 4-38, 4-40 Baton Rouge Harbor, La. (LMN) 11-38 Baton Rouge Harbor (Devil's Swamp), La. (MR+T) 42-5, 42-26, 42-46 Battle Creek, Bank Protection, Battle Creek, Nebr. (MRO) 21-19 Baudette Harbor, Minn. (NCS) 27-18 Bay City Harbor, Wis. (NCD) 29-9 Bay Ridge and Red Hook Channels, N.Y. (NAN) 2-35 Bay Ridge Channel, N.Y. (NAN) 2-34 Bay River, N.C. (SAW) 6-21 Bayard, W. Va. (NAB) 4-40 Bayfield Harbor, Wis. (NCE) 31-79 Bayou Bartholomew and Tributaries, Ark. and La. (LMK) 12-4, 12-7, 12-9, 12-11, 12-12 Bayou Bodcau and Tributaries, Ark. and La. (LMN) 11-16, 11-26, 11-34, 11-40 Bayou Bodcau Reservoir, La. (LMN) 11-16, 11-26,11-34, 11-39,11-41 Bayou Bodcau, Red Chute, and Loggy Bayou, La. (LMN) 11-41, 11-42 Bayou Bonfouca, La. (LMN) 11-38 Bayou Choupique, La. (LMN) 11-42 Bayou Cocodrie and Tributaries, La. (MR+T) 42-5, 42-12, 42-25, 42-50, 42-54 Bayou Coden, Ala. (SAM) 10-3, 10-28, 10-33 Bayou Dorcheat, Loggy Bayou and Lake Bisteneau, La. (LMN) 11-38, 11-53 Bayou Dupre, La. (LMN) 11-38 Bayou Galere, Miss. (SAM) 10-44 Bayou Grosse Tete, La. (LMN) 11-38 Bayou La Batre, Ala. (SAM) 10-3, 10-28, 10-33 Bayou La Loutre, St. Malo, and Yscolskey, La. (LMN) 11-38 Bayou Lacombe, La. (LMN) 11-38 Bayou Lafourche and Lafourche Jump Waterway, La. (LMN) 11-4, 11-24, 11-29 Bayou Meto, Ark. (MR+T) 42-48 Bayou Nicholas, Coushatta, La. (LMN) 11-40, 11-42 Bayou Pierre, La. (LMN) 11-17, 11-26, 11-34, 11-40, 11-41, 11-42 Bayou Plaquemine Brule, La. (LMN) 11-38 Bayou Queue de Tortue, La. (LMN) 11-38 Bayou Rapides, La. (LMN) 11-42 Bayou Segnette Waterway, La. (LMN) 11-38 Bayou Teche, La. (LMN) 11-5, 11-24, 11-30, 11-35 Bayou Teche and Vermilion River, La. (LMN) 11-5, 11-24, 11-29 Bayou Terrebonne, La. (LMN) 11-38 Bayou Vermilion, La. (LMN) 11-38 Bayous D'Arbonne and Corney, La. (LMK) 12-11 Bayous Des Glaise Diversion Channel, La. (MR+T) 42-46, 42-25, 42-28, 42-52, 42-57 Bayous Rapides, Boeuf, and Cocodrie (MR+T) 42-46 Bayport, Fla. (SAJ) 9-50 Bayport Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-79 Baytown, Tex. (SWG) 15-28 Beals Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-38 Beals Island, Maine (NED) 1-22 Bear Creek, Hannibal, Mo. (NCR) 28-13 Bear Creek, Kendrick, Idaho (NPW) 39-14 Bear Creek, La Quinta, Calif. (SPL) 33-35 Bear Creek, Oreg. (NPP) 37-50 Bear Creek Dam (City of Hannibal, Mo.) (NCR) 28-15 Bear Creek Lake, Colo. (MRO) 21-3, 21-11 Bear River, Calif. (SPK) 35-23 Beards Brook Reservoir, N.H. (NED) 1-50 Beatrice, Nebr. (MRK) 20-23 Beaufort Harbor, N.C. (SAW) 6-3, 6-15, 6-19 Beaver and Mahoning Rivers, Pa. and Ohio (ORP) 26-20 I-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 Beaver Bay Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-3, 31-44, 31-58 Beaver Brook Lake, N.H. (NED) 1-50 Beaver Creek, Montezuma, Ga. (SAM) 10-45 Beaver Creek near Tillamook, Oreg. (NPP) 37-50 Beaver Drainage District, Oreg. (NPP) 37-12, 37-28, 37-37, 37-45 Beaver Lake, Ark. (SWL) 18-6, 18-9, 18-19 Beech Fork Lake, W. Va. (ORH) 25-5, 25-16 Belfast Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-38, 1-39 Belhaven Harbor, N.C. (SAW) 6-21, 6-22 Bell Foley Lake, White River Basin, Ark. (SWL) 18-19, 18-20 Bellaire, Ohio (ORP) 26-21, 26-24 Bellamy River, N.H. (NED) 1-38 Belle Fourche, S. Dak. (MRO) 21-18, 21-20 Belle River Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-79 Belleville Locks and Dam, Ohio (ORD) 22-1, 22-7 Bellevue, Ky. (ORL) 24-29, 24-36 Bellingham Harbor, Wash. (I and J Street Waterway) (NPS) 38-27 Bellingham Harbor, Wash. (NPS) 38-2, 38-15, 38-20 Bellingham, Squalicum Small Boat Harbor, Wash. (NPS) 38-2, 38-15, 38-20 Belpre, Ohio (ORH) 25-21, 25-27 Belton Lake Modification, Tex. (SWF) 16-12 Belton Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-3, 16-14, 16-18 Beltzville Lake, Pa. (NAP) 3-16, 3-23 Benbrook Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-3, 16-14, 16-28 Bennett-McDonald-Smithland D.D., Little Sioux River, Iowa (MRO) 21-20 Bennington, Vt. (NAN) 2-37 Bennington Reservoir, N.H. (NED) 1-50 Benwood, W. Va. (ORP) 26-21, 26-24 Berkeley Harbor, Calif. (SPN) 34-19 Berkeley Marina, Calif. (SPN) 34-19 Berlin Lake, Ohio River Basin, Ohio (ORP) 26-5, 26-14 Berwick Bay Bridge Alteration (LMN) 11-38 Bethlehem, Pa. (NAP) 3-30 Bettendorf, Iowa (NCR) 28-3, 28-8, 28-12 Betterton Harbor, Md. (NAB) 4-33 Beverly Habor, Mass. (NED) 1-38 Big and Little Sallisaw Creeks Navigation Project, Okla. (SWT) 19-3, 19-15, 19-20 Big Bay Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-4, 31-44, 31-59 Big Bend, W. Va. (ORH) 25-23, 25-28 Big Bend Dam-Lake Sharpe, S. Dak. (MRO) 21-8, 21-12 Big Black River, Miss. (LMK) 12-11, 12-12 Big Blue Lake, Ind. (ORL) 24-33, 24-36 Big Blue River, Seward, Nebr. (MRK) 20-23 Big Choctaw Bayou, La. (LMK) 12-12 Big Creek and L'Anguille River, Ark. (LMM) 13-10 Big Creek Canal, Millington, Tenn. (LMM) 13-10 Big (Cunningham) Creek, Ohio (NCB) 32-38 Big Darby Creek, Ohio (ORH) 25-23, 25-28 Big Dry Creek Dam and Diversion, Calif. (SPK) 35-23 Big Fossil Creek, Tex. (SWF) 16-21 Big Hole River, Pennington Bridge, near Twin Bridges, Mont. (MRO) 21-18 Big Horn River, Two Leggin Bridge, near Hardin, Mont. (MRO) 21-18 Big Lake Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (NCR) 28-13, 28-15 Big Pigeon and Little Pigeon Bayous, La. (LMN) 11-38 Big Pine Lake, Ind. (ORL) 24-36 Big Pine Lake, Tex. (SWT) 19-5, 19-15, 19-20 Big Run, Pa. (ORP) 26-23, 26-24 Big Sandy Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-3, 16-14, 16-18 Big Sandy River, W. Va. and Ky., including Levisa and Tug Forks (ORH) 25-3, 26-16, 25-20 Big Sioux River at Sioux City, Iowa and S. Dak. (MRO) 21-3, 21-11 Big Sioux River, Fink Bridge, near Flandreau, S. Dak. (MRO)21-19 Big Sioux River, Schofield Bridge, near Flandreau, S. Dak. (MRO) 21-19 Big Slough & Mayo Ditch, Ark. (MR+T) 42-53 Big South Fork National River and Recreation Area, Ky. and Tenn. (ORN) 23-5, 23-11 Big Spring, Tex. (SWF) 16-21 Big Stone Lake and Whetstone River, Minn. and S. Dak. (NCS)27-3, 27-13 Big Stranger Creek, Kans. (MRK) 20-23 Big Suamico Harbor, Wis. (NCE) 31-79 Big Suamico River, Wis. (NCE) 31-79 Big Sunflower River, Miss. (LMK) (MR+T) 12-11, 42-47 Big Swan Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (LMS) 14-17 Big Timber Creek, N.J. (NAP) 3-28 Big Walnut Lake, Ind. (ORL) 24-33, 24-36 Big Walnut, Ohio (ORH) 25-23, 25-28 Big Wash, Milford, Beaver County, Utah (SPK) 35-23 Billings, Montana (MRO) 21-20 Biloxi Harbor, Miss. (SAM) 10-4, 10-28, 10-33 Binghamton, N.Y. (NAB) 4-13, 4-24, 4-37 Birch Hill Dam, Mass. (NED) 1-13, 1-28, 1-44 Birch Lake, Verdigris River Basin, Okla. (SWT) 19-5, 19-15, 19-34 Birch, W. Va. (ORH) 25-23, 25-28 Bird Rock Area, La Jolla, Calif. (SPL) 33-26 Birds Point-New Madrid Floodway, Mo. (MR+T) 42-49 Biscayne Bay, Fla., Hurricane Protection (SAJ) 9-57 Black Bayou Lake, La. (LMN) 11-41 Black Bayou-Pine Island Area, La. (LMN) 11-42 Black Bayou Reservoir, La. (LMN) 11-42 Black Creek, Gadsden, Ala. (SAM) 10-45 Black Fork at Hendricks, W. Va. (ORP) 26-24 Black River, Ark. & Mo. (SWL) 18-18 Black River, Mich. (NCE) 31-79 Black River, N.C. (SAW) 6-7, 6-16, 6-21 Black River, Wis. (NCS) 27-18, 27-20 Black River Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-79 Black River Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 32-38 Black River, Poplar Bluff, Mo., to Knobel, Ark. (SWL) 18-20 Black River (Port Huron), Mich. (NCE) 31-4, 31-44, 31-59 Black Rock Channel and Tonawanda Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 32-2, 32-21, 32-44 Black Rock Lake, Conn. (NED) 1-16, 1-29, 1-45 Black Walnut Harbor, Md. (NAB) 4-3, 4-21, 4-26 Black Warrior and Tombigbee Rivers, Ala. (SAM) 10-4, 10-28, 10-34, 10-42 Blackbird Creek near Macy, Nebr. (MRO) 21-20 Blackfoot Area, Snake River, Idaho (NPW) 39-13, 39-14, 39-18 Blackfoot Reservoir, Idaho (NPW) 39-14 Blackfoot River, Idaho (NPW) 39-13, 39-14 Blackhawk Creek, Davenport, Iowa (NCR) 28-13 Blackstone, Mass. (NED) 1-22 Blackstone River Basin, Mass. and R.I. (NED) 1-11, 1-42 Blackwater Dam, N.H. (NED) 1-18, 1-30, 1-45 Blackwater River, Fla. (SAM) 10-6, 10-28, 10-35 Blackwater River, Va. (NAO) 5-25 Blaine, Maine (NED) 1-22 Blaine Harbor, Wash. (NPS) 38-27 Blakely Mountain Dam-Lake Quachita, Ark. (LMK) 12-4, 12-6, 12-12 Blind Slough Diking District, Oreg. (NPP) 37-48 Block Island-Hbr of Refuge, R.I. (NED) 1-37, 1-39 Bloomington Lake, Md. and W. Va. (NAB) 4-10, 4-23, 4-31 Blue Marsh Lake, Pa. (NAP) 3-17, 3-23 Blue Mountain Lake, Ark. (SWL) 18-4, 18-8, 18-16 Blue River Basin (Kansas City District) (MRK) 20-17 I-4 INDEX Blue River Channel, Kansas City, Mo. (MRK) 20-2, 20-14 Blue River Lake, Oreg. (NPP) 37-17, 37-28, 37-38, 37-46 Bluestone Lake, W. Va. (ORH) 25-6, 25-17, 25-23 Bluff Creek, Miss. (SAM) 10-43 Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors (BERH) 41-1 Bodega Bay, Calif. (SPN) 34-2, 34-13 Boeuf and Tensas Rivers and Bayou Macon, Ark. and La. (MR+T) 42-48 Boeuf River, La. (LMK) 12-11 Bogue Chitto, La. (SAM) 10-43 Bois De Sioux River, Minn., N. Dak. and S. Dak. (NCS) 27-20 Boise Valley, Idaho (NPW) 39-13, 39-14 Bolles Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-5, 31-44, 31-59 Bon Secour, Ala. (SAM) 10-43 Bon Secour River, Ala. (SAM) 10-6, 10-28, 10-35, 10-43 Bonnet Carre Spillway, La. (MR+T) 42-5, 42-50, 42-52 Bonneville Lock and Dam-Lake Bonneville, Oreg. and Wash. (NPP) 37-19, 37-29, 37-39, 37-53 Bonpas Creek, Ill. (ORL) 24-29, 24-35 Bonum Creek, Va. (NAB) 4-32, 4-33 Boone County, Ky. (ORL) 24-34, 24-35 Booneville Lake, Ky. (ORL) 24-32, 24-36 Boothbay Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-38 Boston Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-2, 1-24, 1-33, 1-37 Boswell Lake, Okla. (SWT) 19-26, 19-27 Boulder Creek, Boulder, Colo. (MRO) 21-21 Bound Brook, Scituate, Mass. (NED) 1-47 Bowman-Haley Lake, N. Dak. (MRO) 21-3, 21-11 Brackenridge, Tarentum and Natrona, Pa. (Allegheny River) (ORP) 26-21, 26-24 Bradford, Pa. (ORP) 26-23, 26-24 Bradley Lake, Alaska (NPA) 40-7, 40-9, 40-11 Braintree, Mass. (NED) 1-22 Bramwell, W. Va. (ORH) 25-26 Brandon Road Lock and Dam, Ill. (NCR) 28-18, 28-19 Branford Harbor, Conn. (NED) 1-38 Branson Cove, Va. (NAB) 4-32, 4-33 Brant Rock Beach, Marshfield, Mass. (NED) 1-50 Braymer Lake, Mo. (MRK) 20-23 Brazos Island Harbor, Tex. (SWG) 15-2, 15-13, 15-17, 15-29, 15-30, 15-35, 15-41 Brazos River, Tex., Velasco to Old Washington (SWG) 15-28 Breton Bay, Md. (NAB) 4-33 Brevard County, Fla. (SAJ) 9-19, 9-32, 9-43 Brevoort Levee, Ill. (ORL) 24-34, 24-35 Bridge Alterations Authorized Chicago, Ill., District (NCC) 30-15 Nashville, Tenn., District (ORN) 23-5 New England Division (NED) 1-11 Portland, Oreg., District (NPP) 37-43 Bridgeport Harbor, Conn. (NED) 1-33, 1-24, 1-37, 1-50 Bridgewater, Va. (NAB) 4-40 Brilliant, Ohio (ORP) 26-21, 26-24 Bristol Harbor, R.I. (NED) 1-3, 1-24, 1-33 Broad Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-33 Broad Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-24 Broad Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-25 Broad Creek River, Del. (NAB) 4-33 Broadkill Beach, Del. (NAP) 3-29 Broadkill River, Del. (NAP) 3-28 Broadwater Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-33 Broadway Lake, S.C. (SAS) 8-8, 8-12, 8-16 Brockway, Pa. (Allegheny River Basin) (ORP) 26-21, 26-24 Brockway Lake, Vt. (NED) 1-50 Broken Bow, Nebr. (MRO) 21-19 Broken Bow Lake, Okla. (SWT) 19-12, 19-18 Bromley, Ky. (ORL) 24-29, 24-36 Bronx River, N.Y. (NAN) 2-2, 2-24, 2-28 Brookfield Lake, Mo. (MRK) 20-23 Brooklyn, W. Va. (ORH) 25-21, 25-27 Brookport, Ill. (ORL) 24-29, 24-34, 24-35 Brookville, Pa. (ORP) 26-23, 26-24 Brookville Lake, Ind. (ORL) 24-7, 24-19, 24-32 Broward County, Fla., Beach Erosion Control and Hillsboro Inlet, Fla., Navigation Project (SAJ) 9-19, 9-32, 9-43 Brown, Clarence J., Dam and Reservoir, Ohio (ORL) 24-10, 24-20 Browns Creek, N.Y. (NAN) 2-5, 2-38 Brownsville, Wash. (NPS) 38-27 Brownwood Channel Improvement, Tex. (SWF) 16-21 Bruces Eddy (Dworshak) Dam and Reservoir, Idaho (NPW) 39-3, 39-9, 39-11 Brunswick County Beaches, N.C. (Cape Fear to North Carolina- South Carolina State Line) (SAW) 6-24 Brunswick Harbor, Ga. (SAS) 8-3, 8-12, 8-14 Brush Bayou, La. (LMN) 11-17, 11-27, 11-34 Buchanan Dam-H. V. Eastman Lake, Calif. (SPK) 35-3, 35-16 Buck Creek, N.C. and S.C. (SAN) 7-9, 7-19 Buckhannon, W. Va. (ORP) 26-23, 26-24 Buckhannon River, W. Va. (ORP) 26-20 Buckhorn Lake, Ky. (ORL) 24-7, 24-19, 24-32 Bucks Harbor, Machiasport, Maine (NED) 1-38 Bucksport Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-38 Buena Vista, Ohio (ORH) 25-21, 25-27 Buena Vista, Va. (NAO) 5-26 Buffalo Bayou and Tributaries, Tex. (SWG) 15-9, 15-15, 15-26,15-37 Buffalo Creek, Meadow Grove, Nebr. (MRO) 21-21 Buffalo Creek, Scranton, N. Dak. (MRO) 21-21 Buffalo Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 32-3, 32-21, 32-27 Buffalo River, Miss. (LMK) 12-12 Buffumville Lake, Mass. (NED) 1-21, 1-31, 1-46 Buford Dam, Ga. (SAM) 10-23 Bull Run, Pa. (NAB) 4-11, 4-23, 4-31 Bull Shoals Lake, Ark. (SWL) 18-6, 18-9, 18-19 Bullocks Point Cove, R.I. (NED) 1-38 Bunker Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-38 Burbank-Eastern System, Calif. (SPL) 33-27 Burbank-Western System, (Lower), Calif. (SPL) 33-27 Burbank-Western System, (Upper), Calif. (SPL) 33-27 Burch Creek, Weber County, Utah (SPK) 35-23 Burgettstown, Pa. (ORP) 26-24 Burgettstown-Slovan, Pa. (ORP) 26-23 Burial Hill Beach, Westport, Conn. (NED) 1-41 Burlington, Iowa (NCR) 28-3, 28-8, 28-12 Burlington, Ohio (ORH) 25-21, 25-27 Burlington Dam, N. Dak. (NCS) 27-4, 27-13 Burlington Harbor, Vt. (NAN) 2-35 Burns Waterway Harbor, Ind. (NCD) 30-2, 30-9 Burnsville Lake, W. Va. (ORH) 25-6, 25-17, 25-23 Bush, Alvin R., Dam, Pa. (NAB) 4-17, 4-25 Bushley Bayou, La. (MR+T) 42-25 Bushy Park Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-11 Butler, Pa. (ORP) 26-23, 26-24 Buttermilk Bay Channel, Mass. (NED) 1-38 Buttermilk Channel, N.Y. (NAN) 2-34, 2-35 Byram River at Pemberwick, Conn. (NAN) 2-37 I-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 C Cache Basin, Ark. (MR+T) 42-8, 42-16, 42-25, 42-53 Cache La Poudre River, Ft. Collins, Colo. (MRO) 21-19 Cache River Diversion, Ill. (LMS) 14-17 Caddo Lake, La. (LMN) 11-17, 11-27, 11-34, 11-40 Cadet Bayou, Miss. (SAM) 10-6, 10-28, 10-35 Cadle Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-33 Caesar Creek Lake, Ohio (ORL) 24-7, 24-20, 24-32 Cagles Mill Lake, Ind. (ORL) 24-8, 24-20, 24-32 Cahaba River, Ala. (SAM) 10-43 Cairo, W. Va. (ORH) 25-26 Calapooya River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-50 Calaveras River and Little John Creek and Tributaries, including New Hogan Lake and Farmington Dam, Calif. (SPK) 35-4, 35-16 Calcasieu River and Pass, La. (LMN) 11-6, 11-24, 11-30 Calcasieu River at Coon Island, La. (LMN) 11-38 Calcasieu River at Devil's Elbow, La. (LMN) 11-7, 11-24, 11-30 Calcasieu River Salt Water Barrier, La. (LMN) 11-38 Caledonia, N.Y. (NCB) 32-41 Calf Pasture Beach Park, Conn. (NED) 1-41 Calfpasture River, Va. (NAO) 5-15 Calico Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-22 California Debris Commission (CDC) 44-1 Calion, Ark. (LMK) 12-12 Calumet Harbor and River, Ill. and Indiana (NCC) 30-2, 30-9, 30-11, 30-14 Calumet River Bridges, Ill. (NCC) 30-15 Cambridge Harbor, Md. (NAB) 4-33 Cambridgeport Lake, Vt. (NED) 1-50 Camden Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-38 Camelsback Dam, Ariz. (SPL) 33-29 Camp Ground Lake, Ky. (ORL) 24-8, 24-20 Camp Perry, Ohio (NCB) 32-41 Camp Wooten, .Wash. (NPW) 39-14 Campti-Clarence Area in Natchitoches Parish, La. (LMN) 11-40, 11-42 Canapitsit Channel, Mass. (NED) 1-37, 1-38 Canaveral Harbor, Fla. (SAJ) 9-3, 9-29, 9-35, 9-46 Candy Lake, Verdigris River Basin, Okla. (SWT) 19-6, 19-15, 19-20 Cane River, La. (LMN) 11-38 Caney Fork River, Tenn. (ORN) 23-18 Canisteo, N.Y. (NAB) 4-14, 4-24, 4-37, 4-38 Cannelton, Ind. (ORL) 24-29 Cannelton Locks and Dam, Ind. (ORD) 22-1, 22-8 Cannon, Clarence, Dam and Reservoir, Mo. (LMS) 14-8, 14-12, 14-15 Canton, Mass. (NED) 1-22, 1-47 Canton, Mo. (NCR) 28-13, 28-15 Canton (Nimishillen), Ohio (ORH) 25-26 Canton Lake, Okla. (SWL) (SWT) 18-16, 19-6, 19-15, 19-22, 19-24 Canyon Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-4, 16-14, 16-18 Cape Charles City Harbor, Va. (NAO) 5-3, 5-16, 5-19 Cape Code Canal, Mass. (NED) 1-3, 1-24 Cape Fear River, N.C., above Wilmington (SAW) 6-3, 6-15 Cape Fear River Basin, N.C. (SAW) 6-8, 6-23 Cape Florida State Park, Fla. (SAJ) 9-51 Cape Girardeau, Mo., No. 2 (LMS) 14-17 Cape Girardeau, Mo., Reaches Nos. 1, 3 and 4 (LMS) 14-17 Cape Henry Channel, Va. (NAO) 5-2, 5-19 Cape May City, N.J. (NAP) 3-29 Cape Porpoise Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-38 Cape Vincent Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 32-4, 32-21, 32-28 Captain Anthony Meldahl Locks and Dam, Ky. (ORD) 22-1, 22-7 Carden's Bottom Drainage District No. 2, Arkansas River, Ark. (SWL) 18-20 Carey, Idaho (NPW) 39-14 Carl L. Estes Dam and Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-21 Carlyle Lake, Ill. (LMS) 14-4, 14-10 Carolina Beach and Vicinity, N.C. (SAW) 6-9, 6-12, 6-16 Carr Fork Lake, Ky. (ORL) 24-9, 24-20, 24-32 Carrabelle Bar and Harbor, Fla. (SAM) 10-43 Carrabelle Harbor, Fla. (SAM) 10-43 Carrollton, Ky. (ORL) 24-29, 24-36 Carters Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-25 Carters Lake and Dam, Ga. (SAM) 10-20, 10-31, 10-45 Carthage Levee, Mo. (SWT) 19-26, 19-27 Caruthersville Harbor, Mo. (LMM) 13-1, 13-6, 13-8 Carvers Harbor, Vinalhaven, Maine (NED) 1-38 Cascadia Lake, Oreg. (NPP) 37-46, 37-50 Caseville Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-5, 31-44, 31-59 Caseyville, Ky. (ORL) 24-29, 24-35 Cashie River, N.C. (SAW) 6-21, 6-25 Cassville Harbor, Wis. (NCD) 29-9 Castle Rock, Wash. (NPP) 37-50 Castlewood Lake, Colo. (MRO) 21-21 Catching Inlet Drainage District, Oreg. (NPP) 37-50 Cathance River, Maine (NED) 1-38 Catherine Creek Lake, Oreg. (NPW) 39-14 Cathlamet, Wash. (NPP) 37-42 Catlettsburg, Ky. (ORH) 25-21, 25-26, 25-27 Cattaraugus Creek, N.Y. (NCB) 32-38 Cattaraugus Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 32-4, 32-21 Cave Run Lake, Ky. (ORL) 24-9, 24-20, 24-32 Cave-In-Rock, Ill. (ORL) 24-29, 24-36 Cayuga Creek, Cheektowaga, N.Y. (NCB) 32-16, 32-24 Cecil M. Harden Lake, Ind. (ORL) 24-10, 24-20, 24-32 Cedar Bayou, Tex. (SWG) 15-28 Cedar Keys Harbor, Fla. (SAJ) 9-49, 9-50 Cedar Point Lake, Kans. (SWT) 19-27 Cedar River Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-5, 31-45, 31-59 Cedars Lock and Dam, Wis. (NCE) 31-78 Celina Dam, Ky. (ORN) 23-20 Center Hill Lake, Ohio River Basin, Tenn. (ORN) 23-7, 23-11, 23-19 Central and Southern Florida (SAJ) 9-25, 9-33, 9-44, 9-51, 9-52, 9-53, 9-54, 9-55 Cerdeo-Kenova, W. Va. (ORH) 25-21, 25-26, 25-27 Chambersburg, Ohio (ORH) 25-21, 25-27 Channel between North and South Hero Island, Lake Champlain, Vt. (NAN) 2-35 Channel Clearing and Snagging on Willamette River and Major Tributaries, (NPP) 37-46, 37-55 Channel connecting Plain Dealing Creek and Oak Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-33 Channel connecting Thoroughfare Bay with Cedar Bay, N.C. (SAW) 6-21 Channel connecting York River, Va. with. Back Creek to Slaights Wharf (NAO) 5-25 Channel from Back Sound to Lookout Bight, N.C. (SAW) 6-3, 6-15 Channel from Naples to Big Marco Pass, Fla. (SAJ) 9-3, 9-29, 9-35 Channel from Pamlico Sound to Rodanthe, N.C. (SAW) 6-21 Channel from Phoebus, Va. to Deep Water in Hampton Roads (NAO) 5-25 Channel Improvements (MR+T) 42-4, 42-25, 42-46, 42-47, 42-47 Channel Improvements for Flood Control and Major Drainage on 16 Streams Tributary to Willamette River (NPP) 37-46 Channel Islands Harbor, Calif. (SPL) 33-2, 33-17, 33-21 Channel to Liberty, Tex. (SWG) 15-8 Channel to Newport News, Va. (NAO) 5-25 Channel to Port Bolivar, Tex (SWG) 15-28 Channels Straits of Mackinac, Mich. (NCE) 31-79 Chaplin River, Perryville, Ky. (ORL) 24-35 I-6 INDEX Charenton Drainage and Navigation Canal (MR+T) 42-46 Chariton River, Iowa (MRK) 20-11 Chariton River, Mo. (1944 Act) (MRK) 20-23 Chariton-Little Chariton Basin, Mo. (1965 Act) (MRK) 20-23 Charles River (Natural Valley Storage Areas), Mass. (NED) 1-12, 1-27, 1-35 Charles River Dam, Mass. (NED) 1-12, 1-22, 1-27, 1-35 Charleston Harbor, S.C. (SAN) 7-3, 7-11, 7-13 Charlestown, N.H. (NED) 1-22, 1-44, 1-47 Charlevoix Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-6, 31-45, 31-59 Charlotte Harbor, Fla. (SAJ) 9-4, 9-29, 9-35 Chartiers Creek, Pa. (ORP) 26-3, 26-13, 26-23 Chaska, Minn. (NCS) 27-4, 27-13 Chatfield Lake, Colo. (MRO) 21-3, 21-11 Chatham (Stage) Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-4, 1-24, 1-33, 1-37 Chattanooga, Tenn. and Rossville, Ga. (ORN) 23-19 Chattanooga Dams and Lakes, Ga. and S.C. (SAS) 8-18 Cheat River, W. Va. (ORP) 26-20 Cheatham Lock and Dam, Tenn. (ORN) 23-20 Cheboygan Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-7, 31-45, 31-60 Cheesequake Creek, N.J. (NAN) 2-35 Chefuncte River and Bogue Falia, La. (LMN) 11-38 Chelsea River, Mass. (NED) 1-37 Chena River Lakes, Alaska (NPA) 40-6, 40-9, 40-11 Cheney Reservoir, Kans. (SWT) 19-11 Cherry and Red Fork Creeks Channel Improvement, Okla. (SWT) 19-26, 19-27 Cherry Creek Lake, Colo. (MRO) 21-4, 21-11, 21-14 Cherryfield, Maine (NED) 1-22, 1-47 Chesapeake, Ohio (ORH) 25-21, 25-27 Chesconessex Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-25 Cheshire, Ohio (ORH) 25-21, 25-27 Chester, Calif. (SPK) 35-5, 35-16 Chester River, Md. (NAB) 4-3, 4-21, 4-28 Chester River, Pa. (NAP) 3-28 Chester River at Chester, Pa. (NAP) 3-20 Chetco River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-2, 37-25, 37-31 Chicago Harbor, Ill. (NCC) 30-3, 30-9, 30-11, 30-14 Chicago River, Ill. (NCC) 30-3, 30-9, 30-11 Chicago River, Ill. (North Branch) (NCC) 30-7, 30-10 Chickamauga Lock and Dam, Tenn. (ORN) 23-17 Chicopee, Mass. (NED) 1-22, 1-44, 1-47, 1-50 Chicopee Falls, Mass. (NED) 1-22, 1-44, 1-47 Chief Joseph Dam-Rufus Woods Lake, Wash (NPS) 38-13, 38-19, 38-24 Chillicothe, Ohio (ORH) 25-2, 25-16 Chilo, Ohio (ORH) 25-21, 25-27 Chincoteague Bay, Va. (NAO) 5-25 Chincoteague Harbor of Refuge, Va. (NAO) 5-25 Chincoteague Inlet, Va. (NAO) 5-4, 5-11, 5-16, 5-19, 5-24 Chino Canyon Improvements, Palm Springs, Calif. (SPL) 33-30 Chippewa Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-79 Chippewa Harbor, Isle Royale, Mich. (NCE) 31-79 Chittenango Creek and Tributaries, N.Y. (NCB) 32-41 Choctaw Bayou and Tributaries, La. (LMN) 11-42 Choctawhatchee Bay to Pensacola Bay, Fla. (SAM) 10-36 Choctawhatchee Bay to West Bay, Fla. (SAM) 10-36 Choctawhatchee River, Fla. and Ala. (SAM) 10-43 Choptank River, Md. (NAB) 4-33 Chouteau Lock and Dam, Okla. (SWL) (SWT) 18-14, 19-4, 19-22 Chouteau, Nameoki, and Venice Drainage and Levee District, Ill (LMS) 14-17 Chowan River, N.C. (NAO) 5-25 Chowan River, N.C. (SAW) 6-21 Christiansted Harbor, V.I. (SAJ) 9-49, 9-50 Cincinnati, Ohio (ORL) 24-34, 24-35, 24-36 City Creek Levee, Calif. (SPL) 33-29 City of Aurora, Colo. (MRO) 21-21 Clackamas River at Dixon Farm Location, Oreg. (NPP) 37-51 Claiborne Harbor, Md. (NAB) 4-33 Claiborne Lock and Dam, Ala. (SAM) 10-20, 10-31, 10-45 Clanton, Ala. (SAM) 10-45 Claremont Lake, N.H. (NED) 1-50 Clarence Cannon Dam and Reservoir, Mo. (LMS) 14-8, 14-12, 14-15 Clarence J. Brown Dam and Reservoir, Ohio (ORL) 24-10, 24-20 Clarendon to Laconia Circle, Ark. (LMM) 13-10 Clarington, Ohio (ORP) 26-21, 26-24 Clark Fork River, Missoula, Mont. (NPS) 38-9, 38-17, 38-23 Clark Point, New Bedford, Mass. (NED) 1-41 Clarks Hill Lake, Ga. and S.C. (SAS) 8-9, 8-12, 8-18 Clarkson, Nebr. (MRO) 21-19, 21-21 Clarksville, Ark. (SWL) 18-20 Clatskanie Drainage District, Oreg. (NPP) 37-45, 37-49 Clatskanie River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-42 Clatskanie River Area, Oreg. (NPP) 37-45, 37-49 Clatsop County Diking District 4, Oreg. (NPP) 37-45, 37-49 Clatsop County Diking District 6, Oreg. (NPP) 37-45, 37-49 Clatsop County Drainage District 1, Oreg. (NPP) 37-45, 37-49 Clayton Lake, Little River Basin, Okla. (SWT) 19-6, 19-15, 19-36 Clear Creek, Franklin, Ohio (ORL) 24-35 Clear Creek, Tex. (SWG) 15-10, 15-15, 15-26 Clear Creek and Cleark Lake, Tex. (SWG) 15-28 Clear Creek Drainage and Levee District, Ill (LMS) 14-17 Clearwater Lake, Mo. (SWL) 18-4, 18-8, 18-19 Clearwater Pass, Fla. (SAJ) 9-35, 9-49, 9-50 Clearwater River, Minn. (NCS) 27-20 Clendenin, W. Va. (ORH) 25-23, 25-28 Cleveland and Lakewood, Ohio (NCB) 32-40 Cleveland Harbor, Ohio (NCB) 32-5, 32-21, 32-28 Cleves, Ohio (ORL) 24-29, 24-36 Cliff Walk, Newport, R.I. (NED) 1-41 Clifton, W. Va. (ORH) 25-21, 25-27 Clifty Creek Lake, Ind. (ORL) 24-36 Clinch River, Tenn., and Va. (ORN) 23-18 Clinton, Ind. (ORL) 24-30, 24-36 Clinton, Iowa (NCR) 28-3, 28-8, 28-12, 28-13 Clinton Harbor, Conn. (NED) 1-4, 1-24, 1-33 Clinton Harbor, Iowa (NCD) 29-9 Clinton Lake, Kans. (MRK) 20-3, 20-14 Clinton River, Mich. (NCE) 31-7, 31-45, 31-60 Cloverport, Ky. (ORL) 24-29, 24-34, 24-35 Clyde, R.I. (NED) 1-50 Clyde Park, Mont. (MRO) 21-18 Coal Creek and Tributaries (Lake City), Tenn. (ORN) 23-19 Coal Creek Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (NCR) 28-13, 28-15 Coal Grove, Ohio (ORH) 25-21, 25-27 Coal River, W. Va. (ORH) 25-27 Coan River, Va. (NAB) 4-33 Coast of California, Point Mugu to San Pedro Breakwater, Calif. (SPL) 33-26 Coastal Engineering Research Center (CERC) 43-1 Coasters Island Harbor, R.I. (NED) 1-38 Cobscook Bay, Maine (NED) 1-38 Cocheco River, N.H. (NED) 1-38, 1-47 Cochiti Lake, N. Mex. (SWA) 17-5, 17-12, 17-14, 17-15 Cochrane, Wis. (NCS) 27-20 Cockrells Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-25 Coeur D'Alene, Idaho (NPS) 38-28 Cohansey River, N.J. (NAP) 3-28 Cohasset Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-37, 1-38 Cold Regions Research Engineering Laboratory (CRREL) 52-1 Cold Spring Inlet, N.J. (NAP) 3-3, 3-21, 3-24 I-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 Colebrook River Lake, Conn. (NED) 1-13, 1-28, 1-44 Colfax, Grant Parish, La. (LMN) 11-41, 11-42 Colfax, Wash. (NPW) 39-14 Colliers, W. Va. (ORP) 26-23 Collinsville, Ala. (SAM) 10-45 Colonial Beach, Va. (NAB) 4-10, 4-23, 4-31 Colorado River, Matagorda, Tex. (SWG) 15-28 Colorado Springs, Colo. (Templeton Gap Floodway) (SWA) 17-15 Columbia, La. (LMK) 12-12 Columbia, N.C. (SAW) 6-25 Columbia and Lower Willamette Rivers below Vancouver Wash., and Portland, Oreg. (NPP) 37-2, 37-25, 37-31, 37-41, 37-45 Columbia Drainage and Levee District No. 3, Ill. (LMS) 14-3, 14-10, 14-13 Columbia Drainage District 1, Oreg. (NPP) 37-45, 37-49 Columbia River and Tributaries above Celilo Falls to Kennewick, Wash. (NPW) 39-13 Columbia River at Baker Bay, Wash. (NPP) 37-3, 37-25, 37-32 Columbia River at the Mouth, Oreg. and Wash. (NPP) 37-4, 37-25, 37-33 Columbia River Basin, Local Flood Protection Projects (NPW) 39-1, 39-11, 39-13 Columbia River Basin, Local Protection Projects, Idaho, Mont., and Wash. (NPS) 38-28 Columbia River between Chinonk Wash., and Head of Sand Island (NPP) 37-4, 37-25, 37-32 Columbia River between Vancouver, Wash., and The Dalles, Oreg. (NPP) 37-4, 37-25, 37-33 Columbia River Treaty Permanent Engineering Board 49-2 Columbia River, Wenatchee to Kettle Falls, Wash. (NPS) 38-27 Columbia Slough, Oreg. (NPP) 37-42 Columbus, Nebr. (MRO) 21-19 Columbus, Ohio (ORH) 25-21, 25-27 Compo Beach, Westport, Conn. (NED) 1-41 Computer Sciences Laboratory 51-1 Conant Brook Dam, Mass. (NED) 1-13, 1-28, 1-44 Conchas Lake, N. Mex. (SWA) 17-2, 17-12 Concordia, Ky. (ORL) 24-29, 24-35 Conemaugh River Lake, Pa. (ORP) 26-6, 26-14 Conetoe Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-24 Coney Island Creek, N.Y. (NAN) 2-35 Coney Island Inlet, N.Y. (NAN) 2-35 Conklin-Kirkwood, N.Y. (NAB) 4-40 Conneaut Harbor, Ohio (NCB) 32-6, 32-21, 32-29 Connecticut River (above Hartford), Conn. (NED) 1-38 Connecticut River Basin, Vt., N.H., Mass. and Conn. (NED) 1-12, 1-43 Connecticut River below Hartford, Conn. (NED) 1-4, 1-24, 1-34, 1-49 Connecticut River, North Stratford, N.H. (NED) 1-15, 1-28, 1-36 Connecticut River, W. Stewartstown, N.H. (NED) 1-47 Construction Engineering Research Laboratory (CERL) 50-1 Construction of Locks and Dams, Ohio River (ORP) 26-2 Construction of Locks and Dams, Ohio River (ORD) 22-1, 22-4, 22-6 Contentnea Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-21, 6-24 Conway County Drainage & Levee District No. 1, Arkansas River, Ark. (SWL) 18-20 Conway County Levee District No. 6, Arkansas River, Ark. (SWL) 18-20 Conway County Levee Districts Nos. 1, 2, & 8, Arkansas River, Ark. (SWL) 18-20 Cook, Minn., Little Fork River (NCS) 27-22 Cook Inlet Shoals, Alaska (NPA) 40-12 Cooper Lake and Channels, Tex. (LMN) 11-42 Cooper Lake and Channels, Tex. (SWF) 16-4, 16-14, 16-18 Cooper River, Charleston Harbor, S.C. (SAN) 7-3, 7-11, 7-14 Cooper River, N.J. (NAP) 3-28 Coordinating Committee on Greak Lakes Basic Hydraulic and Hydrologic Data Board 49-2 Coos and Millicoma Rivers, Oreg. (NPP) 37-6, 37-26, 37-34 Coos Bay, Oreg. (NPP) 37-5, 37-25, 37-33 Coosa River Navigation, Ala. (SAM) 10-21, 10-31 Copan Lake, Verdigris River Basin, Okla. (SWT) 19-6, 19-16, 19-20 Copes Corner Lake, New York (NAB) 4-36, 4-37, 4-40 Coquille River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-6, 37-26, 37-34, 37-51 Coralville Lake, Iowa (NCR) 28-4, 28-8, 28-12 Coraopolis, Pa. (ORP) 26-21, 26-24 Corbin (Lynn Camp Creek), Ky. (ORN) 23-19 Corbin, Ky. (ORN) 23-19 Cordell Hull Lock and Dam, Tenn (ORN) 23-20 Cordova Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-12 Cordova Small Boat Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-2, 40-8, 40-10 Core Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-24 Corea Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-5, 1-25, 1-34 Corning, N.Y. (NAB) 4-14, 4-24, 4-37, 4-38 Cornucopia Harbor, Wis. (NCE) 31-8, 31-45, 31-60 Corpus Christi, Tex., Channel to Navy Seaplane Base, Encinal Peninsula (SWG) 15-28 Corpus Christi Beach, Tex. (Restoration Project) (SWG) 15-9, 15-14, 15-26 Corpus Christi Ship Channel, Tex. (SWG) 15-2, 15-13, 15-17, 15-29, 15-30, 15-35 Corsica River, Md. (NAB) 4-33 Corte Madera Creek, Calif. (SPN) 34-20 Cortland, N.Y. (NAB) 4-38, 4-39, 4-40 Cottage Grove Lake, Oreg. (NPP) 37-17, 37-29, 37-38, 37-46 Cottonwood Creek, Calif. (SPK) 35-5, 35-16 Cottonwood Creek Dam, Boise, Idaho (NPW) 39-14 Cottonwood Slough Pumping Plant, Ill (LMN) 13-10 Cotuit Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-38, 1-50 Cougar Lake, Oreg. (NPP) 37-20, 37-29, 37-39, 37-46 Council Bluffs, Iowa (MRO) 21-19, 21-21 Council Grove Lake, Grand (Neosho) River Basin, Kans. (SWT) 19-6, 19-26 Courtenay Channel, Fla. (SAJ) 9-49, 9-50 Cove Island, Stanford, Conn. (NED) 1-41 Covington, Ky. (ORL) 24-29, 24-34, 24-35 Cow Creek Channel Improvement, Kans. (SWT) 19-27 Cowanesque Lake, Pa. (NAB) 4-16, 4-25, 4-38, 4-39 Cowlitz County Consolidated Diking Improvement Districts 1 and 2, Wash. (NPP) 37-45, 37-49 Cowlitz County Diking Improvement Districts 2, 13 and 15, Wash. (NPP) 37-45, 37-49 Cowlitz County Drainage Improvement District 1, Wash. (NPP) 37-49 Cowlitz River, Wash. (NPP) 37-41, 37-42, 37-40 Cowlitz River at Randle, Wash. (NPP) 37-51 Cowlitz River Basin, Wash. (NPP) 37-15 Cowpen Swamp, S.C. (SAN) 7-9, 7-19 Coyote and Spencer Creeks, Oreg. (NPP) 37-50 Coyote Creek, Calif. (SPN) 34-20 Coyote Valley Dam (Lake Mendocino) and Channel Improvements, Calif. (SPN) 34-15, 34-19, 34-20 Crabtree Swamp, S.C. (SAN) 7-9, 7-19 Craig Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-12 Craig Small Boat Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-2, 40-8, 40-10 Crane Creek Drainage and Levee District (NCR) 28-13, 28-15 Crane Creek State Park, Ohio (NCB) 32-44 Cranes Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-25 Crawford County Levee District, Arkansas River, Ark. (SWL) 18-20 Creede, Williow Creek, Colo. (Floodway) (SWA) 17-15 Crescent City Harbor, Calif. (SPN) 34-2, 34-13, 34-16 Criehaven Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-38 I-8 Crisfield Harbor, Md. (NAB) 4-33 Crooked Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, Pa. (ORP) 26-6, 26-14 Crooked Creek Lake & Levee, Ark. (SWL) 18-20 Cross-Florida Barge Canal (SAJ) 9-4, 9-29, 9-35, 9-46, 9-47 Cross Rip Shoals Nantucket Sound, Mass. (NED) 1-38 Cross Village Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-8, 31-45, 31-60 Crutcho Creek Channel Improvement, Okla. (SWT) 19-27 Crystal River, Fla. (SAJ) 9-49, 9-50 Cucamonga Creek, Calif. (SPL) 33-7, 33-18, 33-23 Cuckold Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-33 Cuivre River, Mo. (LMS) 14-15 Culdesac, Idaho 39-14 Cumberland, Ky. (ORN) 23-11, 23-18 Cumberland, Md., and Ridgeley, W. Va. (NAB) 4-11, 4-23, 4-31 Cumberland River, Tenn. and Ky. (ORN) 23-1, 23-11, 23-13, 23-15 Cummings Park, Stanford, Conn. (NED) 1-41 Cunninghill Cove, Md. (NAB) 4-33 Current River, Ark. & Mo. (SWL) 18-18 Curry Creek Dam and Lake, Ga. (SAS) 8-17 Curwensville Lake, Pa. (NAB) 4-17, 4-25 Cushman-Mapleton Channels Oreg. (NPP) 37-41, 37-42 Cuttyhunk Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-37, 1-38 Cuyahoga River Basin, Ohio (NCB) 32-17, 32-24 Cypress Bayou and Waterway between Jefferson, Tex., and Shreveport, La. (LMN) 11-38 Cypress Creek, Ky. (ORL) 24-34 Cypress Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-33 D Dade County, Fla. (SAJ) 9-20, 9-32, 9-43 Dale Hollow Lake, Ohio River Basin, Tenn. and Ky. (ORN) 23-8, 23-11, 23-19 Dallas Floodway, Tex. (SWF) 16-21 Dam "A" Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-12, 16-18 Damariscotta River, Maine (NED) 1-38 Dana Point Harbor, Calif. (SPL) 33-26 Danbury, Conn. (NED) 1-45, 1-47 Dansville and Vicinity, N.Y. (NCB) 32-17, 32-24 Dardanelle Lock & Dam (No. 10), Ark. (SWL) 18-6, 18-9, 18-14, 18-15 Darien Harbor, Ga. (SAS) 8-17 Dashields Locks and Dam, Pa. (ORD) 22-1, 22-6 Dauphin Island Bay, Ala. (SAM) 10-7, 10-29, 10-35 Davenport, Iowa (NCR) 28-4, 28-8, 28-12 Davenport Center Lake, N.Y. (NAB) 4-36, 4-37, 4-40 Davenport Harbor, Iowa (Credit Island) (NCD) 29-10 Davenport Harbor, Iowa (Lindsay Park) (NCD) 29-9 David Bayou, Miss. (MR+T) 42-24 David D. Terry Lock & Dam, Ark. (SWL) 18-2, 18-13 Davids Creek Lake, Iowa (MRO) 21-21 Davis Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-25 Day, John, Lock and Dam-Lake Umatilla, Oreg. and Wash. (NPP) 37-22, 37-30, 37-40, 37-53 Day, John, River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-49 Days Creek Lake, Oreg. (NPP) 37-17, 37-29, 37-37, 37-38 Dayton, Ky. (ORL) 24-3, 24-19, 24-29 Dayton, Wash. (NPW) 39-14, 39-15 Dayton, Wyo. (MRO) 21-21 DeKalb, Ill. (NCR) 28-13 NDEX De-authorized Projects Buffalo, N.Y., District (NCB) 32-44 Mobile, Ala., District (SAM) 10-44 New England Division (NED) 1-50 Decorah, Iowa (NCS) 27-20 Deep Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-9, 6-16 Deep Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-25 Deep Creek, Newport News, Va. (NAO) 5-25 Deep Fork Channel Improvement, Okla. (SWT) 19-26 Deep River, Wash. (NPP) 37-42 Deep River Area, Wash. (NPP) 37-48 Deer Creek Lake, Ohio (ORH) 25-7, 25-17, 25-23 Deer Creek Prairie Levee, Inc. (ORL) 24-30, 24-36 Deer Island Area, Oreg. (NPP) 37-48, 37-53 Deer Island Drainage District, Oreg. (NPP) 37-45, 37-49 Deer Island Thoroughfare, Maine (NED) 1-38 Degonia and Fountain Bluff Levee and Drainage District, Ill. (LMS) 14-17 Degray Lake, Ark. (LMK) 12-4, 12-6, 12-12 Delaware Coast Protection, Del. (NAP) 3-15, 3-23 Delaware Lake, Ohio (ORH) 25-7, 25-17, 25-23 Delaware River, N.Y., N.J., and Pa., at or near Mouth of Neversink River (NAP) 3-28 Delaware River, Pa., N.J. and Del., Philadelphia to the Sea (NAP) 3-4, 3-21, 3-25, 3-27 Delaware River at Camden, N.J. (NAP) 3-5, 3-21 Delaware River at East Branch, N.Y. (NAP) 3-20 Delaware River between Philadelphia, Pa., and Trenton, N.J. (NAP) 3-3, 3-21, 3-24, 3-27 Delphi, Ind. (ORL) 24-29, 24-34, 24-35 Denison Dam-Lake Texoma, Tex. and Okla. (SWT) 19-12, 19-18 Dennis Creek, N.J. (NAP) 3-28 Depere Lock and Dam, Wis. (NCE) 31-78 Depoe Bay, Oreg. (NPP) 37-6, 37-26, 37-34, 37-42 Dequeen Lake, Ark. (SWL) 18-4, 18-19 Derby, Conn. (NED) 1-22, 1-45, 1-47 Derby, Ind. (ORL) 24-30, 24-36 Des Moines, Iowa (NCR) 28-13, 28-15 Des Moines and Mississippi Levee District No. 1, Mo. (NCR) 28-13, 28-15 Detour Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-9, 31-45, 31-60 Detroit Lake, Oreg. (NPP) 37-21, 37-29, 37-39, 37-46, 37-50 Detroit River, Mich. (NCE) 31-10, 31-46, 31-60, 31-76 Devil, East Twin, and Warm Creeks Channel Improvements and Lytle Creek Levee, Calif. (SPL) 33-29, 33-30 Devils Lake, N. Dak. (NCS) 27-22 Devil's Swamp, La. (MR+T) 42-5, 42-26, 42-46 Dewey Lake, Ky. (ORH) 25-7, 25-17, 25-23 Dickey-Lincoln School Lakes, Maine (NED) 1-20, 1-31, 1-36 Dickinson Bayou, Tex. (SWG) 15-28 Dicks Creek, Amanda Station, Ohio (ORL) 24-35 Dickson, Tenn. (ORN) 23-20 Dierks Lake, Little River Basin, Ark. (SWL) 18-4, 18-9 Diking and Improvement District 11, Cowlitz County, Wash. (NPP) 37-49 Diking and Improvement District 4, Wahkiakum County, Wash. (NPP) 37-48 Diking and Improvement District 5, Cowlitz County, Wash. (NPP) 37-48 Diking District 1 and 3 (Puget Island) and Little Island, Wash. (NPP) 37-48 Diking Districts 2, 3 and 5, Clatsop County, Oreg. (NPP) 37-48 Diking Improvement District 1, Pacific County, Wash. (NPP) 37-48 Diking Improvement Districts 2 and 13, Cowlitz County, Wash. (NPP) 37-49 I-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 Dillingham Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-2, 40-8, 40-10 Dillon Lake, Ohio (ORH) 25-8, 25-17, 25-23 Dillonvale, Ohio (Short Creek) (ORP) 26-21, 26-24 Dismal Swamp Canal (South Mills, N.C.) (NAO) 5-23 Dismal Swamp Canal, (Deep Creek), Va. (NAO) 5-23 Dively Drainage & Levee District, Ill. (LMS) 14-17 Dodge City, Kans. (SWA) 17-2, 17-12, 17-13 Dog and Fowl Rivers, Ala. (SAM) 10-7, 10-29, 10-35 Doheny Beach State Park (Doheny State Beach), Calif. (SPL) 33-26 Dorchester Bay and Neponset River, Mass. (NED) 1-38 Dorena Lake, Oreg. (NPP) 37-18, 37-29, 37-38, 37-46, 37-50 Double Bayou, Tex. (SWG) 15-3, 15-13, 15-19, 15-30, 15-35 Double Creek, N.J. (NAP) 3-28 Douglas Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-12 Douglass Lake, Kans. (SWT) 19-27 Dover, Ky. (ORH) 25-21, 25-27 Downeyville Lake, Ind. (ORL) 24-33 Drainage District 1, Clatsop County, Oreg. (NPP) 37-48 Dresden Island Lock and Dam, Ill. (NCC) 28-18, 28-19 Drinkwater Sewer, Mo. (LMM) 13-4, 13-6, 13-8 Drum Inlet, N.C. (SAW) 6-21 Drum Point Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-11 Drury Drainage District, Ill. (NCR) 28-13, 28-15 Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and Channel Improvements, Calif. (SPN) 34-15, 34-19, 34-20 Dry Creek, Hawarden, Iowa (MRO) 21-21 Dry Fork and East Fork Lakes, Mo. (MRK) 20-23 Dry Pass, Alaska (NPA) 40-12 Dry Run, Iowa (NCS) 27-21 Dubois, Pa. (ORP) 26-23, 26-24 Dubuque, Iowa (NCR) 28-13, 28-15 Dubuque Harbor, Iowa (NCD) 29-9 Duck Creek, Calif. (SPK) 35-23 Duck Creek Channel Improvement, Tex. (SWF) 16-5, 16-14, 16-18 Duck Island Harbor, Conn. (NED) 1-38 Duck Point Cove, Md. (NAB) 4-4, 4-21, 4-28 Duck River, Tenn. (ORN) 23-18 Duluth-Superior Harbor, Minn. and Wis. (NCE) 31-10, 31-46, 31-61 Dungeness River, Wash. (NAS) 38-28 Dunkirk Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 32-7, 32-21, 32-30 Dunn Branch, Woodbine, Camden County, Ga. (SAS) 8-17 Duval County, Fla. (SAJ) 9-21, 9-32, 9-43 Duxbury Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-37, 1-38 Dworshak Dam and Reservoir, Idaho (NPW) 39-3, 39-9, 39-11,39-16 Dyersburg, Tenn. (LMM) 13-10 Dyersburg, Tenn. (Southwest) (LMM) 13-3, 13-6, 13-8 Dymers Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-25 E Eagle Bay and Fort Yates Highway Bridges, N. Dak. (MRO) 21-21 Eagle Creek Lake, Ky. (ORL) 24-36 Eagle Creek Reservoir, Ohio (ORP) 26-24 Eagle Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-79 East Barre Dam, Vt. (NAN) 2-37 East Bay (Hanna Reef), Tex. (SWG) 15-28 East Bay Marina, Olympia Harbor, Wash. (NPS) 38-2, 38-15, 38-20 East Boothbay Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-38 East Branch, Clarion River Lake, Pa. (ORP) 26-6, 26-14 East Branch, Conn. (NED) 1-22, 1-45 East Branch Dam, Conn. (NED) 1-47 East Brimfield Lake, Mass. (NED) 1-21, 1-31, 1-46 East Cape Girardeau and Clear Creek Drainage District, Ill. (LMS) 14-17 East Chester Creek, N.Y. (NAN) 2-35 East Hartford, Conn. (NED) 1-22, 1-44, 1-47 East Liverpool Drainage and Levee District (NCR) 28-13, 28-15 East Lynn Lake, W. Va. (ORH) 25-8, 25-17, 25-23 East Moline, Ill. (NCR) 28-4, 28-8, 28-12 East Muddy and Lake Creek, Oreg. (NPP) 37-50 East Muddy Creek, Mo. (MRK) 20-23 East Nishnabotna River, Near Griswold, Iowa (MRO) 21-20 East Nishnabotna River, Page Co. Bridge, Near Essex, Iowa(MRO) 21-20 East Nishnabotna River, Red Oak, Iowa (MRO) 21-21 East Pass Channel from Gulf of Mexico into Choctawhatchee Bay, Fla. (SAM) 10-8, 10-29, 10-35 East Pearl River, Miss. and La. (SAM) 10-8, 10-29, 10-35 East Peoria Drainage and Levee District (NCR) 28-13, 28-15 East Peoria Sanitary District, Ill. (NCR) 28-13 East Point, La. (LMN) 11-42 East Poplar Bluff & Poplar Bluff, Mo. (SWL) 18-20 East Rainelle, W. Ky. (ORH) 25-26, 25-27 East River, N.Y. (NAN) 2-2, 2-24, 2-28 East River Spur Channel, N.Y. (NAN) 2-34 East Rockaway (DEBS) Inlet, N.Y. (NAN) 2-34, 2-38 East Rockaway Inlet, N.Y. (NAN) 2-3, 2-24, 2-28 East Rockaway Inlet to Rockaway Inlet and Jamaica Bay, N.Y. (Part I) (NAN) 2-12, 2-25, 2-31 East Rockaway Inlet to Rockaway Inlet and Jamaica Bay, N.Y. (Part II) (NAN) 2-37 East Sidney Lake, N.Y. (NAB) 4-14, 4-24, 4-36, 4-37 East St. Louis and Vicinity, Ill. (LMS) 14-3, 14-10, 14-13 East Weaver Creek, Calif. (SPN) 34-20 Eastern Rapides and South-Central Avoyelles Parishes, La. (MR+T) 42-13, 42-25, 42-46, 42-54 Eastlake, Ohio (NCB) 32-41 Eastman, H. V., Lake, Calif. (SPK) 35-3, 35-16 Eastport Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-38 Eau Galle River, Wis. (NCS) 27-4, 27-13 Eau Gallie Harbor, Fla. (SAJ) 9-49, 9-50 Echo Bay Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-35 Edenton Harbor, N.C. (SAW) 6-21 Edgartown Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-38 Edgewater-Weehawken, N.J. (NAN) 2-34 Edinburg Lake, Miss. (SAM) 10-17, 10-31, 10-40 Edisto River, S.C. (SAN) 7-9, 7-17, 7-19 Edisto River, North Fork, S.C. (SAN) 7-19 Edisto River, Vicinity Canadys Landing, S.C. (SAN) 7-19 Ediz Hook, Wash. (NPS) 38-3, 38-15, 38-20 Edmonds Harbor, Wash. (NPS) 38-26, 38-27 Edward Macdowell Lake, N.H. (NED) 1-18, 1-30, 1-46 Eel River, Ind. (ORL) 24-34 Eel River, Calif. (SPN) 34-20 Egegik River, Alaska (NPA) 40-12 Eighteen Mile Island, Ky. (ORL) 24-34 El Dorado, Kans., W. Br., Walnut River, Channel Improvement (SWT) 19-27 El Dorado Lake, Kans. (SWT) 19-7, 19-16, 19-20 El Paso, Tex. (SWA) 17-3, 17-12, 17-13 El Tuque Beach, P.R. (SAJ) 9-21, 9-32, 9-43 Eldred, Pa. (ORP) 26-23 Eldred and Spankey Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (LMS) 14-3, 14-10, 14-13 Elfin Cove, Alaska (NPA) 40-12 Elizabeth, N.J. (NAN) 2-14, 2-26, 2-31 I-10 INDEX Elizabeth River, N.J. (NAN) 2-38 Elizabethtown, Ill. (ORL) 24-30, 24-36 Elk and Little Elk Rivers, Md. (NAB) 4-33 Elk City Lake, Kans. (SWL) (SWT), 18-16, 19-7, 19-16, 19-22, 19-24 Elk Creek, Clyde, Kans. (MRK) 20-23 Elk Creek Harbor, Pa. (NCB) 32-38 Elk Creek Lake, Oreg. (NPP) 37-18, 37-29, 37-39 Elk River, Ala. and Tenn. (ORN) 23-18 Elk River, Minn. (NCS) 27-20, 27-21 Elk River, W. Va. (ORH) 25-20 Elkhorn River, Q Street Bridge, near Gretna, Nebr. (MRO) 21-19 Elkhorn River, Ray Bridge, near Norfolk, Nebr. (MRO) 21-19 Elkins, W. Va. (ORP) 26-3, 26-13, 26-21 Elkland, Pa. (NAB) 4-38, 4-39, 4-40 Elkport, Iowa (NCR) 28-14, 28-15 Ellerbe Creek, Durham County, N.C. (SAW) 6-24 Ellicott Creek, N.Y. (NCB) 32-18, 32-24 Ellis Swamp, Gates County, N.C. (SAW) 6-24 Elm Fork Floodway, Tex. (SWF) 16-5, 16-14, 16-18 Elmira, N.Y. (NAB) 4-15, 4-24, 4-37 Elochoman Slough, Wash. (NPP) 37-42 Emergency Bank Protection Activities Albuquerque, N. Mex., District (SWA) 17-11 Buffalo, N.Y., District (NCB) 32-43 Galveston, Tex., District (SWG) 15-12 Huntington, W. Va., District (ORH) 25-29 Los Angeles, Calif., District (SPL) 33-16 New England Division (NED) 1-23 New York, N.Y., District (NAN) 2-23 Pacific Ocean Division, Hawaii (POD) 36-14 Pittsburg, Pa., District (ORP) 26-26 Portland, Oreg., District (NPP) 37-52 Rock Island, Ill, District (NCR) 28-17 Sacramento, Calif., District (SPK) 35-13 San Francisco, Calif., District (SPN) 34-12 Seattle, Wash., District (NPS) 38-30 St. Louis, Mo., District (LMS) 14-17 St. Paul, Minn., District (SWA) 17-22 Vicksburg, Miss., District (LMK) 12-5 Emergency Flood Control Activities Alaska District (NPA) 40-6 Albuquerque, N. Mex., District (SWA) 17-1 Baltimore, Md., District (NAB) 4-41 Buffalo, N.Y., District (NCB) 32-42 Charleston, S.C., District (SAN) 7-9 Chicago, Ill., District (NCC) 30-8 Detroit, Mich., District (NCE) 31-40 Forth Worth, Tex., District (SWF) 16-12 Galveston, Tex., District (SWG) 15-12 Huntington, W. Va., District (ORH) 25-15 Jacksonville, Fla., District (SAJ) 9-28 Los Angeles, Calif., District (SPL) 33-16 Memphis, Tenn., District (LMM) 13-5 New England Division (NED) 1-23 New Orleans, La., District (LMN) 11-23 Pacific Ocean Division, Hawaii (POD) 36-6 Philadelphia, Pa., District (NAP) 3-20 Portland, Oreg., District (NPP) 37-1.5 Rock Island, Ill., District (NCR) 28-17 Sacramento, Calif., District (SPK) 35-13 San Francisco, Calif., District (SPN) 34-12 Seattle, Wash., District (NPS) 38-29 St. Louis, Mo., District (LMS) 14-8, 14-17 St. Paul, Minn., District (NCS) 27-22 Vicksburg, Miss., District (LMK) 12-5 Walla Walla, Wash., District (NPW) 39-2 Emergency Streambank and Shoreline Protection New York, N.Y., District (NAN) 2-23 Empire-Stratton, Ohio (ORP) 26-21, 26-24 Emsworth Locks and Dam, Pa. (ORD) 22-1, 22-6 Endrlin, N. Dak. (NCS) 27-20, 27-22 Endicott Johnson City and Vestal, N.Y. (NAB) 4-40 Engineer Topographic Laboratories (ETL) 51-1 England Pond Levee, Ill. (ORL) 24-29, 24-34, 24-35 English Coulee, Grand Forks, N. Dak. (NCS) 27-22 English, Ind. (ORL) 24-34, 24-35 Enid Diversion Canal and Levee, Okla. (SWT) 19-26 Enid Lake, Miss. (MR+T) 42-18, 42-55 Enid Levee Floodway, Okla. (SWT) 19-27 Entiat River, Wash. (NPS) 38-28 Erie Harbor, Pa. (NCB) 32-7, 32-22, 32-30, 32-44 Escambia and Conecuh Rivers, Fla. and Ala. (SAM) 10-8, 10-29, 10-35 Esquatzel Coulee, Connell Wash. (NPW) 39-14, 39-15 Essex River, Mass. (NED) 1-38 Estes, Carl L., Dam and Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-21 Eufaula Lake, Okla. (SWL) (SWT) 18-16, 19-13, 19-18, 19-22, 19-25 Evansdale, Iowa (NCR) 28-4, 28-8, 28-12 Evanston, Ill. (NCC) 30-15 Evansville, Ind. (ORL) 24-3, 24-19, 24-29, 24-34 Everett Harbor and Snohomish River, Wash. (NPS) 38-3, 38-15, 38-20 Everglades Harbor, Fla. (SAJ) 9-50 Exeter River, N.H. (NED) 1-38 Experimental Chloride Control Project, Red River Basin, Estelline and Guthrie, Tex. (SWT) 19-27 F Fabius River Drainage District, Mo. (NCR) 28-14, 28-15 Fair Haven Beach State Park, N.Y. (NCB) 32-40 Fairbanks, Alaska (NPA) 40-13 Fairbanks, Tanana River and Chena Slough, Alaska (NPA) 40-13 Fairbury, Nebr. (MRK) 20-23 Fairfield Vicinity Streams, Calif. (SPK) 35-23 Fairport Harbor, Ohio (NCB) 32-8, 32-22, 32-31 Fajardo Harbor, P.R. (SAJ) 9-50 Fall Brook Lake, Pa. (NAB) 4-35, 4-36, 4-40 Fall Creek Lake, Oreg. (NPP) 37-18, 37-29, 37-39, 37-46, 37-50 Fall River Basin, S. Dak. (MRO) 21-4, 21-11 Fall River Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-5, 1-25, 1-37 Fall River Lake, Kans. (SWL) (SWT) 18-16, 19-7, 19-16 Falls Lake, N.C. (SAW) 6-10, 6-16 Falmouth Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-38 Falmouth Lake, Ky. (ORL) 24-10, 24-20, 24-32 Fancy Bluff Creek, Ga. (SAS) 8-17 Far Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-20, 6-21 Fargo, N. Dak. (NCS) 27-20 Farm Creek, Ill. (NCR) 28-4, 28-9, 28-12 Farmers Drainage and Levee District (NCR) 28-14, 28-15 Farmington, N.H. (NED) 1-22 Faulkner County Levee District No. 1, Arkansas River, Ark. (SWL) 18-20 Feather River, Calif. (SPK) 35-21 Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 47-1 Ferguson Creek, Oreg. (NPP) 37-50 Fern Ridge Lake, Oreg. (NPP) 37-19, 37-29, 37-39, 37-46, 37-50 I-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 Fernandina Harbor, Fla. (SAJ) 9-5, 9-29, 9-35 Ferrells Bridge Dam-Lake O' The Pines, Tex. (LMN) 11-42 Ferrells Bridge Dam-Lake O' The Pines, Tex. (SWF) 16-5, 16-14, 16-18 Ferry Butte, Idaho (NPW) 39-14 Filberts Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-24 Fire Island Inlet, N.Y. (NAN) 2-35 Fire Island Inlet to Jones Inlet, N.Y. (NAN) 2-12, 2-26, 2-31 Fire Island Inlet to Montauk Point, N.Y. (NAN) 2-15, 2-26, 2-31 Fisher, O. D., Dam and Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-8, 16-15, 16-19 Fishing Bay, Md. (NAB) 4-33 Fishing Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-33 Fishing Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-21 Fishing Creek, Pine Grove, W. Va. (ORH) 25-26 Fishtrap Lake, Ky. (ORH) 25-9, 25-17, 25-23 Fitchburg, Mass. (NED) 1-47 Fivemile River Harbor, Conn. (NED) 1-38, 1-50 Flannagan, John W., Dam and Reservoir, Va. (ORH) 25-9, 25-18, 25-23 Flat Creek, Oreg. (NPP) 37-50 Flat Rock Creek Channel Improvement, Tulsa, Okla. (SWT) 19-26, 19-27 Flathead River, Mont. (NPS) 38-27 Flathead River near Kalispell, Mont. (NPS) 38-9, 38-18, 38-23 Fletcher and Sunshine Gardens Levee, Ind. (ORL) 24-30, 24-36 Flood Control and Coastal Emergency Activities Pittsburgh, Pa., District (ORP) 26-12 Floodwall and Levees at Portland, Oreg. (NPP) 37-50 Florence Levee, Kans. (SWT) 19-26, 19-27 Floyd River, Sioux City, Iowa (MRO) 21-21 Flushing Bay and Creek, N.Y. (NAN) 2-34, 2-35 Fly Creek, Ala. (SAM) 10-9, 10-29, 10-36 Follansbee, W. Va. (ORP) 26-21, 26-24 Folly Brook, Wethersfield, Conn. (NED) 1-44, 1-47 Folly River, S.C. (SAN) 7-4, 7-11, 7-14 Folsom Lake, American River, Calif. (SPK) 35-23 Fore River, Braintree and Weymouth, Mass. (NED) 1-5, 1-25, 1-34 Forest Heights, Md. (NAB) 4-40 Forest River, N. Dak. (NCS) 27-20 Forestville, Mich. (NCE) 31-79 Forked Deer River, Tenn., including South Fork (LMM) 13-10 Forsyth, Mont. (MRO) 21-21 Forsythe, Mont. (MRO) 21-18 Forth Chartres and Ivy Landing Drainage District No. 5 and Stringtown Drainage and Levee District No. 4, Ill. (LMS) 14-17 Fort Cobb Reservoir, Okla. (SWT) 19-11 Fort Fisher and Vicinity, N.C. (SAW) 6-7, 6-16 Fort Gibson Lake, Okla. (SWL) (SWT) 18-16, 19-13, 19-18 Fort Kent, Maine (NED) 1-22, 1-47 Fort Leavenworth, Kans., Bridge Removal (MRK) 20-20 Fort Loudon Lock and Dam, Tenn. (ORN) 23-17 Fort Macon State Park, N.C. (SAW) 6-22 Fort Madison Harbor, Iowa (NCD) 29-10 Fort Myers Beach, Fla. (SAJ) 9-5, 9-29, 9-36 Fort Niagara State Park, N.Y. (NCB) 32-40 Fort Peck Lake, Mont. (MRO) 21-2, 21-11 Fort Pierce, Fla. (SAJ) 9-22, 9-32, 9-43 Fort Pierce Harbor, Fla. (SAJ) 9-6, -29, 9-36 Fort Randall Dam-Lake Francis Case, S. Dak. (MRO) 21-8, 21-12 Fort Scott Lake, Kans. (MRK) 20-21, 20-23 Fort Smith, Arkansas River, Ark. (SWL) 18-20 Fort Supply Lake, North Canadian River Basin, Okla. (SWT) 19-7, 19-16, 19-34 Fort Worth Floodway (Clear Fork), Tex. (SWF) 16-21 Fort Worth Floodway (West Fork), Tex. (SWF) 16-21 Foss Reservoir, Okla. (SWT) 19-11 Foster Joseph Sayers Dam, Pa. (NAB) 4-18, 4-25 Four Pole Creek, W. Va. (ORH) 25-26 Four River Basins, Fla. (SAJ) 9-26, 9-33, 9-45, 9-56 Fourche Creek, Little Rock, Arl. (SWL) 18-20 Fourmile Run, Va. (NAB) 4-12, 4-23, 4-31 Fox Point Barrier, R.I. (NED) 1-47 Fox River, Wis. (NCE) 31-11, 31-46, 31-62 Fox River Locks and Dam, Wis. (NCE) 31-78 Francis E. Walter Dam, Pa. (NAP) 3-17, 3-23 Frankfort Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-12, 31-46, 31-62 Frankfort, Kans. (MRK) 20-23 Frankfort, Ky. (ORL) 24-29, 24-34, 24-35 Franklin Falls Dam, N.H. (NED) 1-18, 1-30, 1-45 Franklin, W. P., Lock and Dam, Fla. (SAJ) 9-51 Frazer-Wolf Point, Mont. (MRO) 21-4, 21-11 Frazeysburg, Ohio (ORH) 25-23, 25-28 Freeport, Ill. (NCR) 28-15 Freeport, Pa. (ORP) 26-21, 26-24 Freeport and Vicinity, Tex. Hurricane-Flood Protection (SWG) 15-10, 15-15, 15-26 Freeport Harbor, Tex. (SWG) 15-3, 15-13, 15-19, 15-29, 15-30, 15-35 Fremont, Ohio (NCB) 32-41 French Broad and Little Pigeon Rivers, Tenn. (ORN) 23-18 Frenchboro Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-38 Freshwater Bayou, La. (LMN) 11-7, 11-25, 11-30 Friday Harbor Marina, Wash. (NPS) 38-4, 38-16, 38-21 Friendly, W. Va. (ORH) 25-21, 25-27 Friendsville, Md. (ORP) 26-33, 26-24 From North Little Rock to Gillett, Ark. (Above Plum Bayou) (SWL) 18-20 Fullerton, Ky. (ORH) 25-21, 25-27 Fulton, Ill (NCR) 28-5, 28-9, 28-12 G Galax, Va. (ORH) 25-21, 25-26, 25-27 Galena, Ill. (NCR) 28-14, 28-15 Galisted Dam, N. Mex. (SWA) 17-6, 17-12, 17-15 Gallipolis Locks and Dam, W. Va. (ORD) 22-1, 22-7 Gallipolis, Ohio (ORH) 25-21, 25-27 Galveston Harbor and Channel, Tex. (SWG) 15-4, 15-13, 15-20, 15-29, 15-30 Gapway Swamp, N.C. and S.C. (SAN) (SAW) 6-24, 7-9, 7-19 Gardner, Mass. (NED) 1-22, 1-44, 1-47 Gardners Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-24 Garland City, Ark. (LMN) 11-40, 11-42 Garnett Lake, Kans. (MRK) 20-21, 20-23 Garrison Dam-Lake Sakakawea, N. Dak. (MRO) 21-9, 21-13 Gasconnade River, Mo. (MRK) 20-20 Gastineau Channel, Aslaska (NPA) 40-12 Gate Creek Lake, Oreg. (NPP) 37-46, 37-50 Gathright Dam and Lake Moomaw, Va. (NAO) 5-12, 5-18, 5-22 Gauley River, W. Va. (ORH) 25-20 Gavins Point Dam-Lewis and Clark Lake, Nebr. and S. Dak. (MRO) 21-9, 21-13, 21-21 Gaysville Lake, Vt. (NED) 1-50 Genegantslet Lake, N.Y. (NAB) 4-40 General Edgar Jadwin Dam and Reservoir, Pa. (NAP) 3-18, 3-23 General Joe Wheeler Dam (ORN) 23-17 Geneva-On-The-Lake, Ohio (NCB) 32-8, 32-22 Geographic Sciences Laboratory 51-1 I-12 INDEX George, Walter F., Lock and Dam, Ala. and Ga. (SAM) 10-25, 10-32, 10-41 George W. Andrews Lock and Dam, Ala. and Ga. (SAM) 10-24, 10-32, 10-41 Georges River, Maine (NED) 1-38 Georgetown Harbor, S.C. (SAN) 7-5, 7-11, 7-14 Gering Valley, Nebr. (MRO) 21-19, 21-21 Gila and Salt Rivers Levee and Channel Improvements, Ariz. (SPL) 33-29 Gila River Basin, Ariz. (SPL) 33-8, 33-18, 33-23, 33-29 Giles Creek, Elkhorn, Nebr. (MRO) 21-21 Gill Township Levee, Ind. (ORL) 24-34, 24-35 Gillham Lake, Ark. (SWL) 18-5, 18-9 Girty's Run, Millvale, Pa. (ORP) 26-4, 26-13 Glasgow, Mont. (MRO) 21-18, 21-21 Glascow Area, Rockbridge, Va. (NAO) 5-15 Gleason Creek, Nev. (SPK) 35-23 Glen Cove Creek, N.Y. (NAN) 2-3, 2-24, 2-28 Glen Cove Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-35, 2-38 Gloucester Harbor and Annisquam River, Mass. (NED) 1-35, 1-25, 1-37 Goat Island, Ga. and S.C. (SAS) 8-18 Golconda, Ill. (ORL) 24-29, 24-34, 24-35 Gold Creek, Alaska (NPA) 40-6, 40-13 Goldsboro, Neuse River, N.C. (SAW) 6-24 Goleta, Calif., and Vicinity (SPL) 33-10, 33-19, 33-23 Gooding Area, Idaho (NPW) 39-14, 39-15 Gordons Creek, Hattiesburg, Miss. (SAM) 10-17, 10-31, 10-40 Gordons Landing, Lake Champlain, Vt. (NAN) 2-35 Goshen Creek, N.J. (NAP) 3-28 Governor's Run, Md. (NAB) 4-33 Gowanus Creek Channel, N.Y. (NAN) 2-35 Grafton, N. Dak. (NCS) 27-5 Grafton Small Boat Harbor, Ill. (NCD) 29-15 Grand Bayou Pass, La. (LMN) 11-38 Grand Forks, N. Dak. (NCS) 27-20 Grand Haven Harbor and Grand River, Mich. (NCE) 31-13, 31-46, 31-62 Grand Isle and Vicinity, La. (LMN) 11-17, 11-27, 11-34 Grand Marais Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-79 Grand Marais Harbor, Minn. (NCE) 31-13, 31-47, 31-63 Grand Prairie-Bayou Meto, Ark., (MR+T) 42-14, 42-25, 42-48, 42-29, 42-54 Grand River, Grandville, Mich. (NCE) 31-80 Grand River, Lansing, Mich. (NCE) 31-80 Grand Tower Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (LMS) 14-17 Grand Traverse Bay Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-13, 31-47, 31-63 Grande Ronde Lake, Oreg. (NPW) 39-15 Grande Ronde Valley, Oreg. (NPW) 39-13, 39-15 Grandview, Ind. (ORL) 24-30, 24-36 Grandview Bay Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 32-44 Grant Parish, Below Colfax, La. (LMN) 11-41, 11-42 Grant's Canal Lake Providence, La. (MR+T) 42-23, 42-57 Granville, Pa. (ORP) 26-23, 26-24 Grapevine Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-5, 16-14, 16-18 Grasse River (Massena), N.Y. (NCB) 32-38 Grassy Creek, Ind. (ORL) 24-34, 24-35 Grays Harbor and Chehalis River, Wash. (NPS) 38-4, 38-16, 38-20 Grays Landing Lock and Dam, Pa. (ORP) 26-19 Grays Reef Passage, Mich. (NCE) 31-79 Grays River, Wash. (NPP) 37-42 Grayson Lake, Ky. (ORH) 25-9, 25-17 Great Bend, Kans. (SWA) 17-15 Great Chazy River, N.Y. (NAN) 2-35 Great Falls, Mont. (MRO) 21-5, 21-11 Great Kills Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-35 Great Lakes to Hudson River Waterway, N.Y. (NAN) 2-35 Great Pee Dee River, S.C. (SAN) 7-17 Great Salt Plains Lake, Arkansas River Basin, Okla. (SWT) 19-7, 19-16 Great Salt Pond, R.I. (NED) 1-37, 1-38 Great Sodus Bay Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 32-8, 32-22, 32-32, 32-44 Great South Bay, N.Y. (NAN) 2-35 Green and Barren Rivers, Ky. (ORL) 24-2, 24-19, 24-23, 24-25, 24-26 Green Bay Harbor, Wis. (NCE) 31-14, 31-47, 31-63 Green Bay Levee and Drainage District No. 2, Iowa (NCR) 28-14, 28-15 Green Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-6, 1-25, 1-34 Green Peter-Foster Lakes, Oreg. (NPP) 37-21, 37-29, 37-40, 37-47 Green River Lake, Ky. (ORL) 24-11, 24-20, 24-32 Green Valley Creek, Calif. (SPK) 35-23 Greene, N.Y. (NAB) 4-40 Greenfield Bayou Levee, Ind. (ORL) 24-29, 24-35 Greenport Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-35 Greenup, Ky. (ORH) 25-21, 25-27 Greenup Locks and Dam, Ky. (ORD) 22-1, 22-7 Greenvale Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-25 Greenville, Tex. (SWF) 16-6, 16-14, 16-18 Greenville Floodway, Tex. 16-21 Greenville Harbor, Miss. (MR+T) 42-26, 42-52 Greenwich Bay, R.I. (NED) 1-38 Greenwich Harbor, Conn. (NED) 1-38 Greenwich Point Beach, Conn. (NED) 1-50 Greers Ferry Lake, Ark. (SWL) 18-6, 18-9, 18-19 Gregory Drainage District, Mo. (NCR) 28-14, 28-15 Grenada Lake, Miss. (MR+T) 42-18, 42-55 Grove Lake, Kans. (MRK) 20-23 Guadalupe River (Remove Log Jams), Tex. (SWG) 15-28 Guayanes Harbor, P.R. (SAJ) 9-50 Guilford Harbor, Conn. (NED) 1-6, 1-25, 1-34 Guilford Point Beach (Jacobs Beach), Guilford, Conn. (NED) 1-41 Gulf Intracoastal Waterway between Apalachee Bay, Fla. and Mexican Border (Mobile District) (SAM) 10-9, 10-29, 10-36 Gulf Intracoastal Waterway between Apalachee Bay, Fla., and Mexican Border (New Orleans Dist.) (LMN) 11-7, 11-25, 11-30, 11-36 Gulf Intracoastal Waterway between Apalachee Bay, Fla., and Mexican Border (SWG) 15-4, 15-13, 15-20, 15-29, 15-33, 15-35, 15-36 Gulf Intracoastal Waterway St. Marks to Tampa Bay, Fla. (SAJ) 9-50 Gulf Beach, Milford, Conn. 1-41 Gulfport Harbor, Miss. (SAM) 10-10, 10-29, 10-37, 10-43 Gull Lake Reservoir, Minn. (NCS) 27-17 Guntersville Lock and Dam, Ala. (ORN) 23-17 Guttenberg, Iowa (NCS) 27-20, 27-21 Guyandotte River, W. Va. (ORH) 25-20 Gypsum, Kans. (MRK) 20-3, 20-14 H H. V. Eastman Lake, Calif. (SPK) 35-3, 35-16 Hackleman Corners Lake, Mo. (MRK) 20-23 Haines Harbor, Alaska, (NPA) 40-12 Haleiwa Beach, Hawaii (POD) 36-13 Halfmoon Bay Harbor, Calif. (SPN) 34-19 Hall Meadow Brook, Conn. (NED) 1-22 I-13 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 Hall Meadow Brook Dam, Conn. (NED) 1-45, 1-47 Hamburg L-575, Iowa (MRO) 21-20 Hamlin Beach Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 32-38 Hamlin Beach State Park, N.Y. (NCB) 32-40 Hammersley Inlet, Wash. (NPS) 38-27 Hammonassett Beach, Madison, Conn. (NED) 1-41 Hammond Bay Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-14, 31-47, 31-63 Hammond Small Boat Basin, Oreg. (NPP) 37-42 Hammondsport, N.Y. (NCB) 31-41 Hampton Beach, Hampton, N.Y. (NED) 1-41 Hampton Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-4, 5-16, 5-19 Hampton Harbor, N.Y. (NED) 1-6, 1-25, 1-34 Hampton Institute, Va. (NAO) 5-23 Hampton Roads and Harbors of Norfolk News, Va.-Collection and Removal of Drift (NAO) 5-4, 5-16, 5-20 Hampton Roads Harbor, Supervision of (NAO) 5-8, 5-17 Hana Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-12 Hanalei Bay Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii (POD)'36-36-12 Hanapepe Bay, Hawaii (POD) 36-13 Hanapepe River, Hawaii (POD) 36-6, 36-13 Hancock Brook Lake, Conn. (NED) 1-16, 1-29, 1-45 Hanging Rock Ohio. (ORH) 25-21, 25-27 Hannibal, Mo. (NCR) 28-15 Hannibal Harbor, Mo. (NCD) 29-10 Hannibal Locks and Dam, W. Va. (ORD) 22-1, 22-6 Hanson, Howard A., Dam, Wash. (NAS) 38-11, 38-18, 38-24 Harbor Beach Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-15, 31-47, 31-64 Harbor of Baltimore, Md., Prevention of Obstructions and Injurious Deposits (NAB) 4-4, 4-21, 4-38 Harbor of Refuge, Block Island, R.I. (NED) 1-38 Harbor of Refuge, Delaware Bay, Del. (NAP) 3-6, 3-21, 3-25, 3-5 Harbor of Refuge, N.C. (SAW) 6-21 Harbor of Refuge, Pt. Judith, R.I. (NED) 1-38 Harden, Cecil, M., Lake, Ind. (ORL) 24-10, 24-20, 24-32 Hardwick Dams (NAN) 2-37 Harlan County Lake, Nebr. (MRK) 20-3, 20-14, 20-21 Harlem River, N.Y. (NAN) 2-35 Harpers Ferry, W. Va. (NAB) 4-40 Harpswell, Maine (NED) 1-22 Harraseeket River, Maine (NED) 1-38 Harriet Island, Minn (NCD) 29-12 Harriet Island Harbor, St. Paul, Minn. (NCD) 29-9 Harris Fork Creek, Tenn. and Ky. (MR+T) 42-54 Harrisburg, Ill. (ORL) 24-29, 24-34, 24-35 Harrison County, Miss. (SAM) 10-44 Harrisonville Levee and Drainage District, Ill. (LMS) 14-3, 14-10, 14-13 Harrisville Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-15, 31-47, 31-64 Harrodsburg, Ky. (ORL) 24-34 Harry S. Truman Dam and Reservoir, Mo. (MRK) 20-12, 20-16, 21-21 Harsha, William H., Lake, Ohio (ORL) 24-17, 24-21, 24-32 Hartford, Conn. (NED) 1-22, 1-44, 1-47 Hartford, Vt. (NED) 1-44, 1-47 Hartford, W. Va. (ORH) 25-21, 25-27 Hartwell Drainage and Levee District, Ill (LMS) 14-4, 14-10, 14-13 Hartwell Lake, Ga. and S.C. (SAS) 8-9, 8-13, 8-16, 8-18 Harvey Canal, Bayou Barataria Levee, La. (LMN) 11-42 Hastings, Minn. (NCS) 27-20 Hastings Harbor, Minn. (NCD) 29-9 Haverhill, Mass. (NED) 1-22 Havre, Mont. (MRO) 21-18, 21-21 Havre, Scott Coulee-Bull Hook Dam, Mont (MRO) 21-18 Hawarden, Iowa (MRO) 21-20 Hawesville, Ky. (ORL) 24-29, 24-34, 24-35 Hawley, Pa. (NAP) 3-20 Hay (West Harbor), Fisher's Island, N.Y. (NED) 1-38 Hay Creek, Birdsboro, Pa. (NAP) 3-15, 3-23 Hayden Island, Oreg. (NPP) 37-45, 37-49 Hays, Kans. (MRK) 20-23 Haysi, Va. (ORH) 25-23, 25-28 Hayward Creek, Mass. (NED) 1-22 Haward Creek, Quincy Braintree, Mass. (NED) 1-47 Heeia-Kea Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-12 Heise-Roberts Area, Idaho (NPW) 39-14, 39-15 Heise-Roberts Extension, Idaho (NPW) 39-13, 39-14, 39-15 Helena Harbor, Ark. (LMM) 13-2, 13-6, 13-8 Hellens Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-33 Helm Lake, Ill. (ORL) 24-33,24-36 Hempstead County Levee District No. 1, Ark. (LMN) 11-41, 11-42 Hempstead Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-35 Henderson County Drainage Districts Nos. 1, 2 and 3, Ill. (NCR) 28-14, 28-15 Henderson, W. Va. (ORH) 25-21, 25-27 Hendrick's Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-38 Hennepin Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (NCR) 28-14, 28-15 Henry T. Rainey, Dam, Ill. (NCD) 29-8 Hergot Drainage and Levee District (NCR) 28-14 Herkimer, N.Y. (NAN) 2-37 Herreid Spring Creek, S. Dak. (MRO) 21-21, 21-19 Herring Bay & Rockhold Creek, Md (NAB) 4-4, 4-21, 4-28 Herring Creek, Md (NAB) 4-33 Heyburn Lake, Arkansas River Basin, Okla. (SWT) 19-7, 19-16 Hickman Harbor, Ky. (LMM) 13-2, 13-6, 13-8 Hidden Dam-Hensley Lake, Fresno River, Calif. (SPK) 35-6, 35-16 Higginsport, Ohio (ORH) 25-21, 25-27 Highland Bayou, Tex. (SWG) 15-10, 15-15, 15-26 Hildegrand Lock and Dam, W. Va. (ORP) 26-19 Hills Creek Lake, Oreg. (NPP) 37-21, 37-30, 37-40, 37-47, 37-50 Hillsborough Bay, Fla. (SAJ) 9-57 Hillsborough River, Fla. (SAJ) 9-42 Hillsdale Lake, Kans. (MRK) 20-4, 20-14, 20-21 Hillview Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (LMS) 14-4, 14-10, 14-13 Hilo Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-2, 36-7, 36-9, 36-12 Hingham Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-38 Hitchins, Ky. (ORH) 25-26 Hiwassee River, Tenn. (ORN) 23-18 Hockingport, Ohio (ORH) 25-21, 25-27 Hodges Dam, Calif. (SPL) 33-29 Hodges Village Dam, Mass. (NED) 1-21, 1-31, 1-46 Holbrrook Levee, Ariz. (SPL) 33-29 Holland Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-15, 31-48, 31-64 Holley Lake, Oreg. (NPP) 37-47, 37-50 Hollywood-Ardmore Beach along Lake Michigan, Ill. (NCC) 30-6, 30-10, 30-13 Holmes Bay, Whiting, Maine (NED) 1-47 Holmes Creek, Fla. (SAM) 10-43 Holston River, Tenn. (ORN) 23-18 Holyoke, Maine (NED) 1-22, 1-44, 1-47 Homer Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-3, 40-8, 40-10 Homme Lake and Dam, N. Dak. (NCS) 27-5, 27-13 Homochitto River, Miss. (LMK) 12-12, 12-12 Homosassa River, Fla. (SAS) 8-49, 9-50 Honey Creek Levee, Ind. (ORL) 24-30, 24-36 Honey Hill Lake, N.H. (NED) 1-50 Honga River and Tar Bay, Md. (NAB) 4-5, 4-21, 4-28 Honokohau Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-11, 36-12 Honolulu Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-2, 36-7, 36-9 Hoonah Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-3, 40-8, 40-10 Hooper, Nebr. (MRO) 21-19, 21-21 Hoosic Falls, Hoosic River Basin, N.Y. (NAN) 2-37 Hop Brook Lake, Conn. (NED) 1-16, 1-29, 1-45 I-14 INDEX Hopkinton-Everett Lakes, N.H. (NED) 1-19, 1-30, 1-46 Hoquiam River, Wash. (NPS) 38-27 Hords Creek Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-6, 16-15, 16-18 Horn Harbor, Va. (NAO) 5-25 Hornell, N.Y. (NAB) 4-15, 4-24, 4-37, 4-38 Horseshoe Cove, Fla. (SAJ) 9-49, 9-50 Hoskins Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-25 Hot Springs, S. Dak. (MRO) 21-18 Houlka Creek, Miss. (SAM) 10-18, 10-31, 10-40 Houma Navigation Canal, La. (LMN) 11-9, 11-25, 11-31 Housatonic River, Conn. (NED) 1-38, 1-50 Housatonic River Basin, Conn. (NED) 1-16, 1-45 Hosatonic River, Pittsfield, Mass. (NED) 1-17, 1-30, 1-36 Housatonic River, Salisbury, Conn. (NED) 1-17, 1-30, 1-36 Housatonic River, Sheffield, Mass. (NED) 1-17, 1-30, 1-36 Houston Ship Channel, Tex. (SWG) 15-6, 15-14, 15-22, 15-29, 15-31, 15-35 Howard A. Hanson Dam, Wash. (NPS) 38-11, 38-18, 38-24 Howards Mill Lake, N.C. (SAW) 6-24 Hudson River, Fla. (SAJ) 9-50 Hudson River, N.Y. (NAN) 2-4, 2-24, 2-28, 2-33 Hudson River Channel, N.Y. (NAN) 2-35 Hugo Lake, Kiamichi River Basin, Okla. (SWT) 19-8, 19-16, 19-34, 19-36 Hulah Lake, Verdigris River Basin, Okla (SWT) 19-8, 19-16 Humboldt Bay, Calif. (SPN) 34-9 Humboldt Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-12 Humboldt Harbor and Bay, Calif. (SPN) 34-3, 34-13, 34-16 Humboldt River and Tributaries, Nev. (SPK) 35-6, 35-16 Hunt Drainage District and Lima Lake Drainage District, Ill. (NCR) 28-14, 28-15 Hunting Island Beach, S.C. (SAN) 7-8, 7-12, 7-16 Huntingdon, Tenn. (LMM) 13-4, 13-6, 13-8 Huntington, Mass. (NED) 1-44, 1-47 Huntington, W. Va. (ORH) 25-21, 25-26, 25-27 Huntington Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-35, 2-38 Huntington Lake, Ind. (ORL) 24-11, 24-20 Huron Harbor, Ohio (NCB) 32-9, 32-22, 32-32 Hurricane Barrier Operations New England Division (NED) 1-23 Hutchinson Levee and Channel, Kans. (SWT) 19-26, 19-27 Hyannis Harbor, Mass (NED) 1-37, 1-38 Hydraulics and Hydrology of the Great Lakes (NCE) 31-42 I Iao Stream, Hawaii (POD) 36-5, 36-8, 36-10 Ice Harbor at Marcus Hook, Pa. (NAP) 3-28 Ice Harbor at New Castle, Del. (NAP) 3-28 Ice Harbor Lock and Dam-Lake Sacajawea, Wash. (NPW) 39-4, 39-7, 39-12, 39-17, 39-20 Ida Grove, Iowa (MRO) 21-19, 21-21 Iliuliuk Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-12 Illinois and Mississippi Canal, Ill. (NCR) 28-3, 28-8 Illinois River, Ill. (MR+T) 42-17 Illinois Waterway, Ill. and Ind. (NCR)28-2, 28-8, 28-10, 28-18, 28-19, 28-20, 28-21 Imperial Beach, Calif. (SPL) 33-18, 33-22 Indian Bend Wash, Ariz. (SPL) 33-8, 33-18, 33-23 Indian Creek Area, Ill. (LMS) 14-17 Indian Creek, Corydon, Ind. (ORL) 24-34, 24-35 Indian Grave Drainage District, Ill. (NCR) 28-14, 28-15 Indian Hills, Ohio (ORL) 24-34 Indian Island, Maine (NED) 1-22 Indian Lake, Kans. (MRK) 20-23 Indian River Inlet and Bay, Del. (NAP) 3-6, 3-21, 3-25 Indiana Harbor, Ind. (NCC) 30-4, 30-9, 30-12 Indianapolis, Ind. (ORL) 24-34 Indianapolis, Ind. (Fall Creek Section) (ORN) 23-35 Indianola, Nebr. (MRK) 20-21, 20-23 Industry, Pa. (ORP) 26-21, 26-24 Inez, Ky. (ORH) 25-26 Inland Route, Mich. (NCE) 31-16, 31-45, 31-64 Inland Waterway from Chincoteague Bay, Va., to Delaware Bay, Del. (NAP) 3-7, 3-21 Inland Waterway from Delaware River to Chesapeake Bay, Del. and Md. (NAP) 3-7, 3-22, 3-26 Inland Waterway from Franklin to Mermentau River, La. (LMN) 11-38 Inland Waterway from the Mississippi River to Bayou Teche, La. (LMN) 11-38 Inland Waterway, Rehoboth Bay to Delaware Bay, Del. (NAP) 3-7, 3-22, 3-25 Intercounty D. D., Little Sioux River, Iowa (MRO) 21-20 International Boundary Waters Boards, 49-1 International Champlain-Richelieu Board 49-2 International Great Lakes Diversions and Consumptive Uses Study Board 31-42, 49-2 International Great Lakes Technical Information Network Board 31-42, 49-2 International Joint Commission Board of Control (IJC) 49-1 International Kootenay Lake Board of Control 49-1 International Lake Champlain Board of Control 49-1 International Lake Erie Regulation Study Board 31-42, 49-2 International Lake Memphremagog Board 49-2 International Lake of the Woods Control Board 49-1 International Lake Superior Board of Control 31-52, 49-1 International Niagara Board of Control, 31-42, 49-1 International Niagara Committe 49-2 International Niagara Working Committe 31-52 International Osoyoos Lake Board of Control 49-1 International Rainy Lake Board of Control 49-1 International Skagit River Board of Control 49-1 International Souris-Red Rivers Engineering Board, 49-2 International St. Croix River Board of Control 49-1 International St. Lawrence River Board of Control 31-42, 49-1 Interstate Highway Bridge (Barge Channel), Oreg. (NPP) 37-42 Intracoastal Waterway, Caloosahatchee River to Anclote River, Fla. (SAJ) 9-6, 9-30, 9-36 Intracoastal Waterway, Jacksonville to Miami, Fla. (SAJ) 9-7, 9-30, 9-36 Intracoastal Waterway, Miami to Key West, Fla. (SAJ) 9-49, 9-50 Iola Levee, Kans. (SWT) 19-26, 19-27 Iowa River-Flint Creek Levee District No. 16, Iowa (NCR) 28-14, 28-15 Ipswich River, Mass. (NED) 1-38 Irondequoit Bay, N.Y. (NCB) 32-9, 32-22 Ironton, Ohio (ORH) 25-21, 25-26, 25-27 Irving Township, Jackson Co., Wis. (NCS) 27-22 Irvington Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-38 Isabella Lake, Kern River, Calif. (SPK) 35-7, 35-16 Island Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-33 Island Creek, St. Georges Island, Md. (NAB) 4-5, 4-21, 4-28 Island End River, Chelsea, Mass. (NED) 1-6, 1-25, 1-34 Island Levee, Ind. (ORL) 24-29, 24-35 Isle Au Haut Thoroughfare, Maine (NED) 1-38 Isle of Shoals Harbor, Maine and N.H. (NED) 1-38 Israel R., Lancaster, N.H. (NED) 1-44 I-15 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 Ithaca, N.Y., Cascadilla Creek (NCB) 32-44 Ithaca, N.Y., Cayuga Inlet (NCB) 32-41 Ithaca, N.Y., Fall Creek (NCB) 32-44 J J. Percy Priest Dam and Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, Tenn. (ORN) 23-8, 23-11, 23-19 Jackson, Ky. (ORL) 24-29, 24-34, 24-35 Jackson and East Jackson, Miss. (SAM) 10-45 Jackson Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-25 Jackson Hole, Wyo. (NPW) 39-14, 39-15 Jacksonville Harbor, Fla. (SAJ) 9-7, 9-30, 9-37 Jadwin, General Edgar, Dam and Reservoir, Pa. (NAP) 3-18, 3-23 Jamaica Bay, N.Y. (NAN) 2-5, 2-24, 2-29, 2-34 James River, Va. (NAO) 5-5, 5-16, 5-20, 5-24 Jamestown Reservoir, N. Dak. (MRO) 21-21 Jarvis Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-25 Jefferson River, Bank Protection, near Waterloo, Mont. (MRO) 21-18 Jefferson River, Willow Creek Bridge, near Three Forks, Mont. (MRO) 21-18 Jeffersonville-Clarksville, Ind. (ORL) 24-29, 24-34, 24-35 Jemez Canyon Dam, N. Mex. (SWA) 17-6, 17-13, 17-15 Jenkins, Tom, Dam, Ohio (ORH) 25-14, 25-19 Jenks Levee, Okla. (SWT) 19-26, 19-27 Jennings Beach, Fairfield, Conn. (NED) 1-41 Jim Woodruff Lock and Dam, Ga. and Fla. (SAM) 10-24, 10-32,10-42 Joe Creek, Tulsa, Okla (SWT) 19-8, 19-16, 19-20, 19-26 John Day Lock and Dam-Lake Umatilla, Oreg. and Wash. (NPP) 37-22, 37-30, 37-40, 37-53 John Day River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-49. John Drainage District, Oreg. (NPP) 37-45, 37-49 John H. Kerr Dam and Reservoir, Va. and N.C. (SAW) 6-12, 6-13, 6-17 John Martin Reservoir, Colo. (SWA) 17-3, 17-12 John Redmond Dam and Reservoir, Grand (Neosho) River Basin, Kans. (SWT) 19-8, 19-16 John W. Flannagan Dam and Reservoir, Va. (ORH) 25-9, 25-18, 25-23 Johns Pass, Fla. (SAJ) 9-8, 9-30, 9-37 Johnson Bay, Lubec, Maine (NED) 1-47 Johnson Bayou, La. (SWG) 15-28 Johnson Creek Vicinity in Portland, Oreg. (NPP) 37-12, 37-28, 37-37, 37-47 Johnson Gorges, Vt. (NAN) 2-37 Johnsonburg, Pa. (ORP) 26-21, 26-23, 26-24 Johnstown, Pa. (ORP) 26-4, 26-13, 26-21 Jones Bluff Lock and Dam, Ala (SAM) 10-21, 10-31 Jones Inlet, N.Y. (NAN) 2-5, 2-24, 2-29, 2-34 Jonesport Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-7, 1-25, 1-34 Jordan, Everett, Dam and Lake, N.C. (SAW) 6-8, 6-13, 6-16 Josias River, Maine (NED) 1-38 Joyce Creek, Camden County, N.C. (SAW) 6-9, 6-16 Julian, Nebr. (MRO) 21-19 Juneau Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-12 K Kaaawa Beach, Hawaii (POD) 36-13 Kahoma Stream, Hawaii (POD) 36-5, 36-8, 36-10 Kahului Beach Road, Hawaii (POD) 36-12 Kahului Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-3, 36-7, 36-9 Kailua Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-12 Kaimu Black Sand Beach, Hawaii (POD) 36-13 Kake Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-3, 40-8, 40-10 Kalama River (South Area) Levee, Wash. (NPP) 37-45, 37-50 Kalamazoo River (Battle Creek), Mich. (NCE) 31-80 Kalamazoo River (Kalamazoo), Mich. (NCE) 31-80 Kalaupapa Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-12 Kanawha River, W. Va. (ORH) 25-1, 25-16, 25-20 Kaneohi'Kailua Area, Hawaii (POD) 36-5, 36-8, 36-10 Kankakee River, Ill. and Ind. (NCC) 30-15 Kanopolis Lake, Kans. (MRK) 20-4, 20-14, 20-21 Kansas City, Kans. (1962 Mod.) (MRK) 20-4, 20-14 Kansas City on Mo. and Kansas Rivers, Mo. and Kans. (MRK)20-17, 20-23 Kansas River Navigation, Kans. (MRK) 20-23 Kapaa Town,, Hawaii (POD) 36-13 Kapaakea Homestead Flood Control, Hawaii (POD) 36-13 Karlson Island, Oreg. (NPP) 37-48 Kaskaskia Island Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (LMS) 14-4, 14-10, 14-14, 14-17 Kaskaskia River, Ill. (LMS) 14-1, 14-4, 14-10, 14-13, 14-14, 14-16 Kaukauna Dam, Wis. (NCE) 31-78 Kaukauna Fifth Lock, Wis. (NCE) 31-78 Kaukauna First Lock, Wis. (NCE) 31-78 Kaukauna Fourth Lock, Wis. (NCE) 31-78 Kaukauna Guard Lock, Wis. (NCE) 31-78 Kaukauna Second Lock, Wis. (NCE) 31-78 Kaukauna Third Lock, Wis. (NCE) 31-78 Kaunakakai Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-11, 36-12 Kaunakakia Stream, Hawaii (POD) 36-6, 36-13 Kaw Lake, Arkansas River Basin, Okla. (SWT) 19-8, 19-17, 19-34 Kawaihae Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-3, 36-7, 36-10 Kawainui Swamp, Hawaii (POD) 36-6, 36-13 Kaweah and Tule Rivers, including Terminus Dam and Success Lake, Calif. (SPK) 35-7, 35-17 Kawkawlin River, Mich (NCE) 31-80 Kays Creek, Utah (SPK) 35-23 Keach Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (LMS) 14-17 Keehi Lagoon, Hawaii (POD) 36-12 Keene, N.H. (NED) 1-22, 1-44, 1-47 Kehoe Lake, Ky. (ORH) 25-10, 25-18 Kekaha Beach, Hawaii (POD) 36-4, 36-8 Kelleys Island, Ohio (NCB) 32-38 Kendrick, Idaho (NPW) 39-13, 39-15 Kenmore Navigational Channel, Wash. (NPS) 38-5, 38-16, 38-21 Kennebec River, Maine (NED) 1-7, 1-26, 1-34 Kennebunk River, Maine (NED) 1-8, 1-26 Kenosha Harbor, Wis. (NCE) 31-17, 31-48, 31-64 Kentucky Lock and Dam, Ky. (ORN) 23-17 Kentucky Peninsula, Ky. (ORL) 24-34 Kentucky River, Ky. (ORL) 24-2, 24-19, 24-27 Keokuk Harbor, Iowa (NCD) 29-10 Kern River-California Aqueduct Intertie, Calif. (SPK) 35-23 Kerr, John H., Dam and Reservoir, Va. and N.C. (SAW) 6-12, 6-13, 6-17 Kerr, Robert S., Lock and Dam, Okla. (SWL) (SWT) 18-14, 19-13, 19-13, 19-22 Kerr, Robert S., Marine Terminal, Sallisaw, Okla. (SWT) 19-22 Kerton Valley Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (NCR) 28-14 I-16 INDEX Ketchikan Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-12 Kewalo Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-12 Kewaunee Harbor, Wis. (NCE) 31-17, 31-48, 31-64 Keweenaw Waterway, Mich. (NCE) 31-18, 31-49, 31-65 Key West, Fla. (SAJ) 9-51 Key West Harbor, Fla. (SAJ) 9-49, 9-50 Keyport Harbor, N.J. (NAN) 2-34, 2-35 Keystone Lake, Okla. (SWL) (SWT) 18-16 19-13, 19-18 Kihei Beach, Hawaii (POD) 36-13 Kikiaola Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-3, 36-8, 36-10 Kill Van Kull-New York and New Jersey Channels, N.Y. (NAN) 2/34 King Cove Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-12 Kings Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-25 Kingston-Edwardsville, Pa. (NAB) 4-40 Kingston Harbor, Wash. (NPS) 38-26, 38-27 Kingston Harbor (North Pymouth), Mass. (NED) 1-38 Kingstree Branch, S.C. (SAN) 7-9, 7-19 Kinzua Dam and Allegheny Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, Pa. and N.Y. (ORP) 26-7, 26-14 Kirwan, Michael J., Dam and Reservoir, Ohio (ORP) 26-8, 26-14 Kishwaukee River at De Kalb, Ill. (NCR) 28-15 Kissimmee River, Fla. (SAJ) 9-49, 9-50 Kittanning, Pa. (ORP) 26-23 Kittanning, Pa. Part I (Allegheny River) (ORP) 26-21, 26-24 Kittanning, Pa. Part II (Allegheny River) (ORP) 26-21, 26-24 Kitzmiller, Md. (NAB) 4-40 Klamath River, Calif. (SPN) 34-21 Klutina River, Copper Center, Alaska (NPA) 40-6, 40-13 Knappa Area, Oreg. (NPP) 37-48 Knapps Narrows, Md. (NAB) 4-5, 4-21, 4-28 Knife River Harbor, Minn. (NCE) 31-18, 31-49, 31-65 Knightville Dam, Mass. (NED) 1-14, 1-28, 1-44 Knobb's Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-21 Kodiak Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-12 Kootenai River, Idaho and Mont. (NPS) 38-27 Kualoa Regional Park, Hawaii (POD) 36-4, 36-8 Kuliouou Stream, Hawaii (POD) 36-6, 36-13 L L'Anguille Basin, Ark. (MR+T) 42-25 L'Angville River, Ark. (MR+T) 42-16 La Crosse, Wis. (NCS) 27-5 La Farge Lake and Channel Improvement, Wis. (NCS) 27-6, 27-14 La Grange Lock and Dam, Ill. (NCR) 28-18 La Pointe Harbor, Wis. (NCE) 31-19, 31-49, 31-65 La Trappe River, Md. (NAB) 4-33 Lac La Belle Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-79 Lac Qui Parle Lake, Minnesota River, Minn. (NCS) 27-5, 27-14 Lacey Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (NCR) 28-14 Lacey, Langellier, West Mantanzas and Kerton Valley Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (NCR) 28-15 Lackawanna, N.Y., Smokes Creek (NCB) 32-41 Lafayette Lake, Ind. (ORL) 24-37 Lafayette River, Va. (NAO) 5-6, 5-16, 5-20 Lago De Cerrillos, P.R. (SAJ) 9-45 Lago De Portugues, P.R. (SAJ) 9-45 Lagoon Pond, Martha's Vineyard, Mass. (NED) 1-38 Lahaina Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-12 Lake Ashtabula and Baldhill Dam, Sheyenne River, N. Dak. (NCS) 27-6, 27-14 Lake Borgne and Chef Menteur-Bulkheads and Jetties (LMN) 11-38 Lake Brownwood Modification, Tex. (SWF) 16-6, 16-15, 16-19 Lake Camanche, Calif. (SPK) 35-23 Lake Celilo, Wash. and Oreg. (NPP) 37-23, 37-30, 37-40, 37-40 Lake Champlain Narrows, N.Y. and Vt. (NAN) 2-7, 2-25, 2-29 Lake Charles Deep Water Channel, La. (LMN) 11-38 Lake Chautauqua and Chadakoin River, N.Y. (Allegheny River Basin) (ORP) 26-21, 26-24 Lake City, Tenn. (ORN) 23-19 Lake City Harbor, Minn. (NCD) (NCS) 27-18, 29-9 Lake Crescent and Dunns Creek, Fla. (SAJ) 9-50 Lake Crockett, Wash. (NPS) 38-5, 38-16, 38-21 Lake Douglas, Ga. (SAM) 10-45 Lake Erie-Ohio Canal, Ohio and Pa. (ORP) 26-20 Lake Fork Lake, Sabine River, Tex. (SWF) 16-21 Lake Francis Case, S. Dak. (MRO) 21-8, 21-12 Lake Greeson, Ark. (LMK) 12-4, 12-6, 12-12 Lake Kemp, Wichita River Basin, (SWT) 19-8, 19-17 Lake Mendocino, Calif. (SPN) 34-15, 34-19, 34-20 Lake Michigan-Lake Bluff, Ill. (NCC) 30-15 Lake Michigan-Lake Forest, Ill. (NCC) 30-15 Lake Montauk Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-34, 2-35 Lake Ocklawaha, Fla. (SAJ) 9-4 Lake Ogleton, Md. (NAB) 4-33 Lake Oroville, Calif. (SPK) 35-8, 35-17 Lake Ouachita (Blakely Mountain Dam), Ark. (LMK) 12-4, 12-6, 12-12 Lake Pontchartrain, La. (MR+T) 42-13, 42-23, 42-28, 42-51, 42-57 Lake Pontchartrain, La. Project Levees (MR+T) 42-41 Lake Pontchartrain and Vicinity, La., (Hurricane Protection) (LMN) 11-18, 11-27, 11-34 Lake Providence Harbor, La. (LMK) 12-1, 12-6, 12-8 Lake River, Wash. (NPP) 37-6, 37-26, 37-34 Lake River Delta Area, Wash. (NPP) 37-45, 37-50 Lake Roussear, Fla. (SAJ) 9-5 Lake Sakakawea, N. Dak. (MRO) 21-9, 21-13 Lake Sharpe, S. Dak. (MRO) 21-8, 21-12 Lake Shelbyville, Ill. (LMS) 14-5, 14-10 Lake Sidney Lanier, Ga. (SAM) 10-23, 10-32, 10-41 Lake St. Clari, Mich., Channels (NCE) 31-19, 31-49, 31-66 Lake Texoma, Tex. and Okla. (SWT) 19-12, 19-18 Lake Thunderbird, Okla. (SWT) 19-12 Lake Traverse, Minn. and S. Dak. (NCS) 27-18 Lake Traverse and Boise De Sioux River, S. Dak. and Minn. (NCS) 27-6, 27-14 Lake Umatilla, Oreg. and Wash. (NPP) 37-22, 37-30, 37-40, 37-53 Lake Washington Ship Canal, Wash. (NPS) 38-8, 38-17, 38-23, 38-26 Lakeport Lake, Calif. (SPK) 35-23 Lakeview Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-6, 16-15, 16-19 Lakeview Park, Lorain, Ohio (NCB) 32-15, 32-24 Lambertville, N.J. (NAP) 3-30 Lamoille River, Vt. (NAN) 2-37, 2-38 Lamprey River, N.H. (NED) 1-38 Lancaster, Mass. (NED) 1-22 Lancaster, N.H. (NED) 1-14, 1-28, 1-35 Lancaster, N.Y. (NCB) 32-41 Langellier Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (NCR) 28-14 Lansing Harbor, Iowa (NCD) 29-9 Lapwai Creek, Culdesac, Idaho (NPW) 39-15 Larchmont Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-35 Largo Sound Channel, Fla. (SAJ) 9-50 Larose to Golden Meadow, La. (Hurricane Protection) (LMN)11-19, 11-27, 11-34 I-17 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 Las Animas, Colo. (SWA) 17-4, 17-12, 17-13 Las Cruces, N. Mex. (SWA) 17-4, 17-12, 17-14 Las Tunas Beach, Calif. (SPL) 33-26 Las Vegas Wash Tributaries, Nev. (SPL) 33-30 Latrobe, Pa. (ORP) 26-21, 26-23, 26-24 Laurel River Lake, Ohio River Basin, Ky. (ORN) 23-9, 23-11, 23-19, 23-20 Lavaca-Navidad River, Tex. (SWG) 15-28 Lavon Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-7, 16-15, 16-19 Lavon Lake Modification and East Fork Channel Improvement, Tex. (SWF) 16-7, 16-15, 16-19 Lawrence, Kans. (MRK) 20-5, 20-15, 20-21 Lawrenceburg, Ind. (ORL) 24-29, 24-34, 24-35 Leading Creek, W. Va. (ORH) 25-23, 25-28 Leaf and Chickasawhay River, Miss. (SAM) 10-43 Leavonworth, Ind. (ORL) 24-30, 24-36 Lebanon Junction, Ky. (ORL) 24-34, 24-35 Le Claire Lock (Canal), Iowa (NCD) 29-7 Lee, Mass. (NED) 1-22, 1-47 Lee County, Fla. (SAJ) 9-51 Leech Lake Reservoir, Minn. (NCS) 27-17 Leesville, Va., Roanoke River, Sec. 32, Demo. Project (SAW) 6-10, 6-16 Leetonia, Ohio (ORP) 26-24 Leetsdale, Pa. (ORP) 26-21, 26-24 Lehigh River at Allentown, Pa. (NAP) 3-20 Lehigh River at Bethlehem, Pa. (NAP) 3-20 Leipsic River, Del. (NAP) 3-28 Leith Creek, S.C. (SAN) 7-8, 7-12, 7-16 Leland Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-19, 31-49, 31-66 Lemon Creek, N.Y. (NAN) 2-35 Les Cheneaux Islands, Channels, Mich. (NCE) 31-79 Letart, W. Va. (ORH) 25-21, 25-27 Letart Falls, Ohio (ORH) 25-21, 25-27 Levee Unit No. 5, Ind. (ORL) 24-4, 24-19, 24-34 Levee Unit No. 8, Ind. (ORL) 24-34, 24-35 Levees (LMK) (LMS) (MR+T) 42-4, 42-5, 42-25, 42-29, 42-30, 42-45, 42-46, 42-48, 42-49, 42-51, 42-52, 42-57, 42-58 Levisa and Tug Forks of the Big Sandy River and Cumberland River, W. Va., Va., and Ky. (ORH) 25-3, 25-16 Lewes, Del. (NAP) 3-29 Lewes and Rehoboth Canal, Del. (NAP) 3-27 Lewis and Clark Lake, Nebr. and S. Dak. (MRO) 21-9, 21-13, 21-21 Lewis River, Wash. (NPP) 37-7, 37-26, 37-34 Lewis River Area, Wash. (NPP) 37-45, 37-50 Lewisport, Ky. (ORL) 24-29, 24-35 Lewiston Levees, Idaho (NPW) 39-15 Lewiston-Clarkston Bridge, Idaho and Wash. (NPW) 39-4, 39-9, 39-12 Lewisville Dam, Tex. (SWF) 16-7, 16-15, 16-19 Lexington Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-20, 31-49, 31-66 Libby Dam-Lake Koocanusa, Mont. (NPS) 38-13, 38-19, 38-25 Liberty Local Protection Project, Tex. (SWG) 15-28 Liberty State Park Levee and Seawall, N.J. (NAN) 2-17, 2-31 Lick Run, Roanoke, Va. (SAW) 6-24 Licking River, Ky. (ORL) 24-28 Lido Key, Fla. (SAJ) 9-51 Lighthouse Point Park, Conn. (NED) 1-41 Lighting Creek, Idaho (NPS) 38-28 Lincoln, N.H. (NED) 1-22 Lincoln, Nebr. (MRO) 21-19 Lincoln Lake, Ind. (ORL) 24-37 Link Location, Idaho (NPW) 39-14 Linton, N. Dak. (MRO) 21-21 Lisle, N.Y. (NAB) 4-15, 4-25, 4-37 Little Bay De Noc Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-79 Little Bay De Noc, Gladstone Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-79 Little Bay, Tex. (SWG) 15-28 Little Blue River, Waterville, Kans. (MRK) 20-11 Little Blue River Channel Improvement, Mo. (MRK) 20-5, 20-15 Little Blue River Lakes, Mo. (MRK) 20-5, 20-15 Little Caillou Bayou, La. (LMN) 11-38 Little Calumet River, Ill. (NCC) 30-7, 30-10, 30-15 Little Chute Combined Lock, Wis. (NCE) 31-78 Little Chute Dam Wis. (NCE) 31-78 Little Chute First (Guard) Lock, Wis. (NCE) 31-78 Little Chute Second Lock, Wis. (NCE) 31-78 Little Cove Creek, Glencoe, Ala. (SAM) 10-45 Little Creek, Kent Island, Md. (NAB) 4-33 Little Dell Lake, Utah (SPK) 35-23 Little Egg Harbor, N.J. (NAP) 3-28 Little Goose Lock and Dam-Lake Bryan, Wash. (NPW) 39-5, 39-9, 39-12, 39-17, 39-20 Little Harbor, N.H. (NED) 1-39 Little Harbor, Woods Hole, Mass. (NED) 1-39 Little Kanawha River, W. Va. (ORH) 25-20 Little Kaukauna Lack and Dam, Wis. (NCE) 31-78 Little Lake Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-20, 31-50, 31-66 Little Machipongo River, Va. (NAO) 5-25 Little Manatee River,Fla. (SAJ) 9-50 Little Missouri River, Ark. (LMK) 12-11, 12-12 Little Neck Bay, N.Y. (NAN) 2-35 Little Nemaha River, Nebr. (MRO) 21-21 Little Papillion, Nebr. (MRO) 21-19, 21-21 Little River, Del. (NAP) 3-9, 3-22, 3-28 Little River, La. (LMK) 12-11 Little River, (Creek), Va. (NAO) 5-24, 5-25 Little River at Cayuga Island, N.Y. (NCB) 32-38 Little River Basin (Little Rock District) (SWL) 18-3, 18-8, 18-12, 18-18 Little River Basin, Mo. (MR+T) 42-10, 42-51, 42-56, 42-58 Little River Diversion Channel, Mo. (MR+T) 42-17, 42-58 Little River Inlet, N.C. and S.C. (SAN) 7-5, 7-11, 7-14 Little River Project Levees (MR+T) 42-44 Little Rock Levee, Ark. (East End Fourche Bayou) (SWL) 18-11, 18-20 Little Rockfish Creek, Hope Mills, N.C. (SAW) 6-24 Little Sioux River and Tributaries, Iowa (MRO) 21-21 Little Sodus Bay Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 32-9, 32-22, 32-32 Little Sugar Creek, Charlotte, N.C. (SAN) (SAW) 6-24, 7-9 Little Tallachatchie River, Miss. (LMK) 12-11 Little Tennessee River, Tenn. (ORN) 23-18 Little Valley Wash, Magna, Utah (SPK) 35-23 Little Wicomico River, Va. (NAB) 4-5, 4-22, 4-28 Littleport, Iowa (NCR) 28-14 Littleville Lake, Mass. (NED) 1-14, 1-28, 1-44 Liverpool Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (NCR) 28-14, 28-15 Lock and Dam No. 1, Minn. (NCD) 29-7 Lock and Dam No. 2, Allegheny River, Pa. (ORP) 26-18 Lock and Dam No. 2, Ark. (SWL) 18-2, 18-13 Lock and Dam No. 2, Minn. (NCD) 29-7 Lock and Dam No. 2, Monongahela River, Pa. (ORP) 26-19 Lock and Dam No. 3, Allegheny River, Pa. (ORP) 26-18 Lock and Dam No. 3, Ark. (SWL) 18-2, 18-13 Lock and Dam No. 3, Minn. (NCD) 29-7 Lock and Dam No. 3, Monogahela River, Pa. (ORP) 26-19 Lock and Dam No. 4, Allegheny River, Pa. (ORP) 26-18 Lock and Dam No. 4, Ark. (SWL) 18-2, 18-13 Lock and Dam No. 4, Monogahela River, Pa. (ORP) 26-19 Lock and Dam No. 4, Wis. (NCD) 29-7 Lock and Dam No. 5, Allegheny River, Pa. (ORP) 26-18 Lock and Dam No. 5, Ark. (SWL) 18-3, 18-13 I-18 INDEX Lock and Dam No. 5, Minn. (NCD) 29-7 Lock and Dam No. 5A, Minn. (NCD) 29-7 Lock and Dam No. 6, Allegheny River, Pa. (ORP) 26-18 Lock and Dam No. 6, Wis. (NCD) 29-7 Lock and Dam No. 7, Allegheny River, Pa. (ORP) 26-18 Lock and Dam No. 7, Minn. (NCD) 29-7 Lock and Dam No. 7, Monogahela River, Pa. (ORP) 26-19 Lock and Dam No. 8, Alleghany River, Pa. (ORP) 26-18 Lock and Dam No. 8, Monogahela River, Pa. (ORP) 26-19 Lock and Dam No. 8, Wis. (NCD) 29-7 Lock and Dam No. 9, Allegheny River, Pa. (ORP) 26-18 Lock and Dam No. 9, Ark. (SWL) 18-3, 18-13 Lock and Dam No. 9, Wis. (NCD) 29-7 Lock and Dam No. 10, Iowa (NCD) 29-7 Lock and Dam No. 11, Ark. (SWL) 18-14 Lock and Dam No. 11, Iowa (NCD) 29-7 Lock and Dam No. 12, Iowa (NCD) 29-7 Lock and Dam No. 13, Ark. (SWL) 18-3, 18-14 Lock and Dam No. 13, Iowa (NCD) 29-7 Lock and Dam No. 13 (Pool) Channel Improvement, Okla. (SWT) 19-3 Lock and Dam No. 14, Iowa (NCD) 29-7 Lock and Dam No. 15, Ill. (NCD) 29-7 Lock and Dam No. 16, Iowa (NCD) 29-8 Lock and Dam No. 17, Ill. (NCD) 29-8 Lock and Dam No. 18, Iowa (NCD) 29-8 Lock and Dam No. 19, Iowa (NCD) 29-8 Lock and Dam No. 20, Mo. (NCD) 29-8 Lock and Dam No. 21, Ill. (NCD) 29-8 Lock and Dam No. 22, Mo. (NCD) 29-8 Lock and Dam No. 24, Mo. (NCD) 29-8 Lock and Dam No. 25, Mo. (NCD) 29-8 Lock and Dam No. 26, Ill. (NCD) 29-8 Lock and Dam No. 52, Ill. (ORD) 22-8 Lock and Dam No. 53, Ill. (ORD) 22-9 Lock and Dam No. 54, Ill. (ORD) 22-9 Lock Haven, Pa. (NAB) Lock S-53, Fla. (SAJ) 9-52 Lock S-55, Fla. (SAJ) 9-52 Lock S-57, Fla. (SAJ) 9-52 Lock S-58, Fla. (SAJ) 9-52 Lock S-59, Fla. (SAJ) 9-52 Lock S-60, Fla. (SAJ) 9-52 Lock S-61, Fla. (SAJ) 9-52 Lock S-62, Fla. (SAJ) 9-52 Lock S-63, Fla. (SAJ) 9-52 Lock S-63A, Fla. (SAJ) 9-52 Lock S-65, Fla. (SAJ) 9-52 Lock S-65A, Fla. (SAJ) 9-52 Lock S-65B, Fla. (SAJ) 9-52 Lock S-65C, Fla. (SAJ) 9-52 Lock S-65D, Fla. (SAJ) 9-52 Lock S-65E, Fla. (SAJ) 9-52 Lock S-96, Fla. (SAJ) 9-52 Lock S-96A, Fla. (SAJ) 9-52 Lock S-157, Fla. (SAJ) 9-52 Lock S-158, Fla. (SAJ) 9-52 Lock S-193, Fla. (SAJ) 9-52 Lock S-308B, Fla. (SAJ) 9-52 Lock S-310, Fla. (SAJ) 9-52 Lock Haven, Pa. (NAB) 4-40 Locklies Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-25 Lockport Lock and Dam, Ill. (NCR) 28-18 Lockwoods Folly River, N.C. (SAW) 6-3, 6-15 Logan, Ohio (ORH) 25-23, 25-28 Logan Creek, Bank Protection, near Bancroft, Nebr. (MRO) 21-19 Long Beach Island, N.J. (NAP) 3-29 Long Branch Lake, Mo. (MRK) 20-6, 20-15 Long Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-11 Long Island Intracoastal Waterway, N.Y. (NAN) 2-34, 2-35 Long Lake Area, Helena, Ark. (LMM) 13-4, 13-6 Longboat Pass, Fla. (SAJ) 9-9, 9-30, 9-37 Lookout Point Lake, Oreg. (NPP) 37-22, 37-30, 37-40, 37-47, 37-50 Lopez Canyon Diversion, Los Angeles River Basin, Calif. (SPL) 33-32 Lopez Dam, Los Angeles River Basin, Calif. (SPL) 33-32 Lorain Harbor, Ohio (NCB) 32-10, 32-22, 32-33, 32-38, 32-44 Los Angeles and Long Beach Harbors, Calif. (SPL) 33-2, 33-17,33-21 Los Angeles County Drainage Area, Calif. (SPL) 33-11, 33-19,33-23, 33-27, 33-28, 33-29 Lost and Little Lost Cr., Channel Improvement, Mo. (SWT) 19-27 Lost Creek, Columbus, Nebr. (MRO) 21-22 Lost Creek Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (NCR) 28-14, 28-15 Lost Creek Lake, Oreg. (NPP) 37-23, 37-30, 37-40, 37-48 Lost River, Minn. (NCS) 27-20, 27-21 Louisville, Ky. (ORL) 24-29, 24-34, 24-35 Louisville Lake, Ill. (ORL) 24-12, 24-20, 24-33 Loup River, Columbus, Nebr. (MRO) 21-21 Low Head Locks and Dams, Okla. (SWT) 19-3, 19-15, 19-20 Lowell, Mass. (NED) 1-22 Lowell, N.H. (NED) 1-46 Lowell Creek, Alaska (NPA) 40-6, 40-13 Lower Arkansas River, Ark. (MR+T) 42-14, 42-25, 42-50, 42-53 Lower Arkansas River Basin, Ark. (MR+T) 42-6 Lower Big Sioux River, Iowa and S. Dak. (MRO) 21-21 Lower Branch Rush River, N. Dak. (NCS) 27-21 Lower Columbia River Basin, Oreg. and Wash. (NPP) 37-13, 37-37, 37-45 Lower Columbia River Basin Bank Protection, Oreg. and Wash. (NPP) 37-3,37-28, 37-37, 37-46 Lower Cowlitz River,Wash. (NPP) 37-51 Lower Dry Creek, Lowden, Wash. (NPW) 39-14, 39-15 Lower Gila River Levee and Channel Improvements (Gila River and Tributaries Downstream from Painted Rock Dam, Ariz. (SPL) 33-29 Lower Grand River, Mo. (MRK) 20-23 Lower Granite Lock and Dam, Wash. (NPW)39-5, 39-9, 39-12, 39-18, 39-20 Lower Guyandotte River Basin, W. Va. (ORH) 25-27 Lower Heart River, N. Dak. (MRO) 21-21 Lower Machodoc Creek, Va. (NAB) 4-33 Lower Monumental Lock and Dam, Wash. (NPW) 39-5, 39-9, 39-12, 39-18, 39-20 Lower Red River Standard Revetments (MR+T) 42-30 Lower Red River-South Bank, Red River Levees, La. (MR+T) 42-5, 42-13, 42-25, 42-40, 42-50, 42-54 Lower San Francisco Bay, Calif. (SPN) 34-19 Lower San Joaquin River and Tributaries, Including Tuolumne and Stanislaus Rivers, Calif. (SPK) 35-17, 35-23 Lower Snake River, Wash., Oreg., Idaho, Fish and Wildlife Compensation (NPW) 39-6, 39-10, 39-12 Lower Thorofare, Deal Island, Md. (NAB) 4-33 Lower Walla Walla River, Wash. (NPW) 39-13 Lower White River and Basin, Ark. (MR+T) 42-16, 42-25, 42-49 Lower White River Levees (MR+T) 42-8, 42-44, 42-50, 42-53 Lower Woonsocket, R.I. (NED) 1-43, 1-47 Lowes Wharf, Md. (NAB) 4-33 Loyalhanna Lake, Ohio River Basin, Pa. (ORP) 26-7, 26-14 Lubec, Maine (NED) 1-22 Lubec Channel, Maine (NED) 1-39 Lucky Peak Lake, Idaho (NPW) 39-2, 39-9, 39-15 Ludington Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-21, 31-50, 31-66 I-19 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 Ludlow, Ky. (ORL) 24-30, 24-36 Ludlow Lake, Vt. (NED) 1-50 Lukfata Lake, Little River Basin, Okla. and Ark. (SWT) 19-8, 19-17, 19-36 Lutsen Harbor, Minn. (NCE) 31-21, 31-50, 31-66 Lyford Levee, Ind. (ORL) 24-34, 24-35 Lyman, Idaho (NPW) 39-14 Lyman Creek, Idaho (NPW) 39-15 Lynches River and Clark Creek, S.C. (SAN) 7-6, 7-11, 7-15 Lynn Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-39 Lynn-Nahant Beach, Mass. (NED) 1-41 Lynnhaven Inlet, Va. (NAO) 5-24, 5-25 Lytle and Cajon Creeks Channel Improvements, Calif. (SPL) 33-29 Lytle and Warm Creeks, Calif. (SPL) 33-13, 33-19, 33-24, 33-34 M Maalaea Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-3, 36-8, 36-10 Macdowell, Edward, Lake, N.H. (NED) 1-18, 1-30, 1-46 Machias River, Maine (NED) 1-39 Mackay Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-21 Mackinac Island Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-79 Mackinaw City Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-79 Macon, Ga. (SAS) 8-17 Macy, Nebr. (MRO) 21-19 Mad Creek, Muscatine, Iowa (NCR) 28-14 Mad River, Conn. (NED) 1-22, 1-44 Mad River Basin, Calif. (SPN) 34-21 Mad River Lake, Conn. (NED) 1-47 Madison, Ind. (ORL) 24-30, 24-34, 24-36 Madison, Nebr. (MRO) 21-19, 21-21 Madison Bay, Md (NAB) 4-32, 4-33 Madison Parish Port, La. (LMK) 12-2, 12-6, 12-8 Magruder Drainage District, Oreg. (NPP) 37-45, 37-48, 37-50 Mahnomen, Minn., Wild Rice River (NCS) 27-22 Mahoning Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, Pa. (ORP) 26-7, 26-14 Maiden Creek Reservoir, Pa. (NAP) 3-30 Maintenance and Repair Fleet and Marine Terminals, Ark. (SWL) 18-3 Maintenance and Repair Fleet and Marine Terminals, Okla. (SWT) 19-6, 19-15, 19-20 Malden River, Mass. (NED) 1-39 Malheur Improvement District, Oreg. (NPW) 39-14, 39-15 Malheur River, Oreg. (NPW) 39-13, 39-15 Mamaroneck Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-5, 2-24, 2-29, 2-34 Manasquan River, N.J. (NAP) 3-9, 3-22, 2-26 Manatee County, Fla. (SAJ) 9-22, 9-32, 9-44 Manatee River, Fla. (SAJ) 9-50 Manchester, Ohio (ORH) 25-21, 25-27 Manchester Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-50 Mandan, N. Dak. (MRO) 21-18, 21-21 Manele Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-11, 36-12 Manhasset Bay, N.Y. (NAN) 2-35 Manhattan, Kans. (MRK) 20-21, 20-23 Maniece Bayou, Ark. (LMN) 11-40, 11-42 Manistee Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-21, 31-50, 31-67 Manistique Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-22, 31-50, 31-67 Manitowoc Harbor, Wis. (NCE) 31-22, 31-50, 31-67 Mankato and North Mankato, Minn. (NCS) 27-6, 26-14 Manokin River, Md. (NAB) 4-33 Mansfield Hollow Lake, Conn. (NED) 1-21, 1-31, 1-46 Manteo (Shallowbag) Bay, N.C. (SAW) 6-4, 6-15 Mantua Creek, N.J. (NAP) 3-28 Maple River, N. Dak. (NCS) 27-19 Mapleshade, Ohio (ORH) 25-21, 25-27 Marblehead Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-50 Marengo, Iowa (NCR) 28-5, 28-9, 28-12 Marietta, Ohio (ORH) 25-21, 25-27 Marina Del Rey, Calif. (SPL) 33-17, 33-22, 33-30 Marion, Ind. (ORL) 24-31, 24-35 Marion, Kansas (SWT) 19-9, 19-17, 19-20 Marion County Drainage District, Mo. (NCR) 28-14, 28-15 Marion Diversion Channel and Levee, (SWT) 19-26 Marion Lake, Grand (Neosho) River Basin, Kans. (SWT) 19-9, 19-17, 19-34 Markham Ferry Lake, Okla. (SWL) 18-16 Markham Ferry Reservoir, Okla. (SWT) 19-13 Markland Locks and Dam, Ind. (ORD) 22-1, 22-8 Marmarth, N. Dak. (MRO) 21-18, 21-21 Marquette Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-79 Marseilles Lock and Dam, Ill. (NCR) 28-18, 28-19 Marsh Creek, Geneva, N.Y. (NCB) 32-41 Marsh River, Minn. (NCS) 27-20 Marshall, Minn. (NCS) 27-20, 27-21 Marshalltown, Iowa (NCR) 28-14, 28-15 Marshland Drainage District, Oreg. (NPP) 37-48 Martin, John Reservoir, Colo. (SWA) 17-3, 17-12 Martin, Ky. (ORH) 25-3, 25-16 Martins Ferry, Ohio (ORP) 26-21, 26-24 Martins Fork Lake, Ky. (ORN) 23-5, 23-11, 23-19 Martis Creek Lake, Martis Creek, Nev. and Calif. (SPK) 35-9, 35-17 Marysville, Kans. (MRK) 20-23 Marysville Lake, Calif. (SPK) 35-23 Mason, W. Va. (ORH) 25-21, 25-27 Mason and Menard Drainage District, Ill. (NCR) 28-14, 28-15 Mason J. Niblack Levee, Ind. (ORL) 24-4, 24-19, 24-29, 24-35 Massillon, Ohio (ORH) 25-3, 25-16, 25-21 Matagorda Ship Channel, Tex. (SWG) 15-6, 15-14, 15-23, 15-31, 15-35 Matawan Creek, N.J. (NAN) 2-35 Matinicus Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-39 Mats Mats Bay, Wash. (NPS) 38-26, 38-27 Mattapoisett Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-50 Mattituck Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-6, 2-34, 2-29 Matunuch Beach, South Kingston, R.I. (NED) 1-41 Mauckport, Ind. (ORL) 24-30, 24-36 Maumee River, Above Toledo, Ohio (NCB) 32-38, 32-44 Maunalua Bay Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-12 Maurice River, N.J. (NAP) 3-28 Maxwell Locks and Dam, Pa. (ORP) 26-19 Mayaguez Harbor, P.R. (SAJ) 9-9, 9-30, 9-37 Mayo, W. D., Lock and Dam, Okla. (SWT) 19-3, 19-22, 19-24 Maysville, Ky. (ORH) 25-21, 25-26, 25-27 McAlpine Locks and Dam (ORD) 22-1, 22-8 McCook Lake, S. Dak. (MRO) 21-21 McGee Creek Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (LMS) 14-6, 14-11 McGinnis Levee, Ind. (ORL) 24-30, 24-36 McGregor, Iowa (NCS) 27-22 McKees Rocks, Pa. (ORP) 26-21, 26-24 McKenzie River near Walterville, Oreg. (NPP) 37-51 McKinney Bayou, Ark. (LMN) 11-40 McKinney Bayou, Ark. and Tex. (LMN) 11-19, 11-27, 11-34 McKinney Bayou, Finn Bayou Segment, Ark. (LMN) 11-42 McLean Bottom Levee District No. 3, Arkansas River, Ark. (SWL) 18-20 McNary Lock and Dam-Lake Wallula-Oreg. and Wash. (NPW) 39-6, 39-10, 39-12, 39-19 I-20 INDEX McNary Second Powerhouse, Oreg. and Wash. (NPW) 39-21 Meadow Grove, Nebr. (MRO) 21-19 Medomak River, Maine (NED) 1-39 Meherrin and Nottoway Rivers, Va. (NAO) 5-15 Melbourne Harbor, Fla. (SAJ) 9-49, 9-50 Meldahl, Captain Anthony, Locks and Dam, Ky. (ORD) 22-1, 22-7 Melton Hill Lock and Dam, Tenn. (ORN) 23-17 Melvern Lake and Pomona Lake (Road Improvement), Kans. (MRK) 20-21 Melvern Lake, Kans. (MRK) 20-6, 20-15, 20-21 Memphis Harbor, Tenn. (MR+T) 42-26 Memphis Harbor Project Levees (MR+T) 42-44, 42-51 Memphis, Wolf River, and Nonconnah Creek, Tenn. (LMM) 13-10 Menasha Lock and Dam (NCE) 31-78 Menemsha Creek, Martha's Vineyard, Mass. (NED) 1-8, 1-26, 1-34 Menominee Harbor and River, Mich. and Wis. (NCE) 31-23, 31-50, 31-67 Meramec Park Lake, Mo. (LMS) 14-5, 14-11 Meramec River Basin, Mo. (LMS) 14-5, 14-14, 14-16 Merced County Streams, Calif. (SPK) 35-9, 35-17 Merced County Stream Group, Calif. (SPK) 35-9, 35-17 Merced River, Calif. (SPK) 35-23 Mercer Lake, Mo. (MRK) 20-23 Meredosia, Ill., and Meredosia, Willow Creek, and Coon Run Drainage and Levee Districts, Ill. (LMS) 14-6, 14-11, 14-14 Meredosia Lake and Willow Creek Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (LMS) 14-6, 14-11, 14-14, 14-17 Meredosia Levee and Drainage District, Ill. (NCR) 28-14, 28-15 Merherrin River, N.C. (NAO) 5-25 Mermentau River, La. (LMN) 11-10, 11-25, 11-31 Mermentau River, Bayou Nezpique, and Bay Des Cannes, La. (LMN) 11-38 Merom, Ind. (ORL) 24-34 Merriam, Kans. (MRK) 20-23 Merriconeag Sound, Harpswell, Maine (NED) 1-47 Merrimack River, Mass. (NED) 1-39 Merrimack River Basin, N.H. and Mass. (NED) 1-18, 1-44 Metamora Lake, Ind. (ORL) 24-32 Methow River, Wash. (NPS) 38-28 Metlakatla Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-4, 40-8, 40-10 Metropolis, Ill. (ORL) 24-29, 24-35 Miami Harbor, Fla. (SAJ) 9-9, 9-30, 9-38 Mianus Harbor, Conn. (NED) 1-37 Mianus River, Conn. (NED) 1-39 Michael J. Kirwan Dam and Reservoir, Ohio (ORP) 26-8, 26-14 Michigan City Harbor, Ind. (NCC) 30-5, 30-9, 30-12, 30-14 Middle Beach, Conn. (NED) 1-41 Middle Creek, Calif. (SPK) 35-23 Middle Gila River Channel Improvements, Upper End of Safford Valley to Buttes Damsite (Camelsback Damsit to Salt River), Ariz. (SPL) 33-29 Middle River and Connecting Channels, Calif. (SPK) 35-21 Middle River and Dark Head Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-33 Middleport, Ohio (ORH) 25-21, 25-27 Middlesboro, Ky. (ORN) 23-6, 23-11 Middlesboro, Ky. (Diversion Canal (ORN) 23-19 Middlesboro, Ky. (Yellow Creek) (ORN) 23-18, 23-19 Middleton Shoals, Ga. and S.C. (SAS) 8-18 Midland Drainage District, Oreg. (NPP) 37-45, 35-48, 37-50 Milan, Ill. (NCR) 28-5, 28-9, 28-12 Miles City, Mont. (MRO) 21-5, 21-11, 21-21 Milford Harbor, Conn. (NED) 1-8, 1-26, 1-35, 1-37 Milford Haven, Va. (NAO) 5-25 Milford Lake, Kans. (MRK) 20-7, 20-15, 20-21 Mill Creek, Ky. (ORL) 24-34, 24-35 Mill Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-33 Mill Creek, Ohio (ORL) 24-5, 24-19 Mill Creek, Tex. (SWG) 15-28 Mill Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-25 Mill Creek, Wash. (NPW) 39-13 Mill Creek and South Slough at Milan, Ill. (NCR) 28-3, 28-8, 28-11 Mill Creek Lake, Ohio (ORH) 25-10 Mill Creek Lake, Wash. (NPW) 39-2, 39-9, 39-11, 39-17 Mill Creek Levees, Calif. (SPL) 33-29, 33-30 Mill Four Drainage District, Oreg. (NPP) 37-51 Mill Lake, Mo. (MRK) 20-23 Miller, Ohio (ORH) 25-21, 25-27 Miller Pond Drainage District, Ill. (LMS) 14-17 Millers Ferry Lock and Dam, Ala. (SAM) 10-21, 10-31 Millersburg, Ohio (ORH) 25-23, 25-28 Millican Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-8, 16-15, 16-19 Millwood, W. Va. (ORH) 25-21, 25-27 Millwood Lake, Little River Basin, Ark. (SWL) 18-5, 18-9 Milton, Ky. (ORL) 24-30, 24-36 Milton-Freewater, Oreg. (NPW) 39-14, 39-15 Milton Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-34, 2-35 Milwaukee Harbor, Wis. (NCE) 31-24, 31-51, 31-68 Mines Creek, Wis. (NCS) 27-20 Mingo Creek, S.C. (SAN) 7-17 Mingo Junction, Ohio (ORP) 26-21, 26-24 Mining City Lake, Ky. (ORL) 24-32, 24-37 Minnesota, Minn. (NCS) 27-20, 27-21 Minnesota River, Minn. (NCS) 27-1, 27-13, 27-16 Minot, N. Dak. (NCS) 27-7, 27-14 Mispillion River, Del. (NAP) 3-10, 3-22 Misquamicut Beach, Westerly, R.I. (NED) 1-41 Mission and Lapwai Creeks, Idaho (NPW) 39-15 Mission Creek, Idaho (NPW) 39-14 Mississinewa Lake, Ind. (ORL) 24-12, 24-21 Mississippi and Leech Rivers, Minn. (NCS) 27-18 Mississippi Delta Region, La. (MR+T) 42-25 Mississippi River Agricultural Area No. 10, Mo. (LMS) 14-17 Mississippi River Agricultural Area No. 12, Mo. (LMS) 14-17 Mississippi River Agricultural Area 8, Mo. (LMS) 14-7, 14-11,14-14 Mississippi River Alluvial Valley Mapping (MR+T) 42-3 Mississippi River and Alluvial Valley below Cape Girardeau, Mo. (MR+T) 42-2 Mississippi River and Tributaries (MR+T) 42-1, to 42-56 Mississippi River and Tributaries-Channel Improvements (MR+T) 42-4 Mississippi River and Tributaries-Levees (MR+T) 42-3 Mississippi River at Alton, Ill. (LMS) 14-15 Mississippi River at St. Louis, (LMS) 14-17 Mississippi River, Alton to Gale, Ill., Underseepage Measures (LMS) 14-17 Mississippi River Bank Revetments and Dikes (MR+T)42-27, 42-28, 42-31, 42-35 Mississippi River, Baton Rouge to Gulf of Mexico, La. (LMN) 11-10, 11-25, 11-31 Mississippi River between Brainard and Grand Rapids, Minn. (NCS) 27-18 Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, Minn. (NCD) 29-1, 29-6, 29-12 Mississippi River between Ohio and Missouri Rivers, Mo. and Ill. (LMS) 14-2, 14-10, 14-13, 14-17 Mississippi River Commission (MR+T) 42-1 Mississippi River Delta at and below New Orleans, La., (New Orleans to Venice, La., Hurricane Protection)(LMN) 11-20,11-27, 11-34 Mississippi River Delta Region La. (MR+T) 42-54 Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet, La. (LMN) 11-12, 11-25, 11-32 Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet, Michoud Canal, La. (LMN) 11-38 1-21 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 Mississippi River Headwater Reservoirs, Minn. (NCS) 27-2, 27-13, 27-16 Mississippi River Improvements (MR+T) 42-9 Mississippi River Levees (MR+T) 42-3, 42-25, 42-39 Mississippi River Main Stem Channel Improvements (MR+T) 42-26 Mississippi River near Aitkin, Minn. (NCS) 27-21 Mississippi River Outlets, Venice, La. (LMN) 11-12, 11-25, 11-32 Mississippi River Tributary and Outlet Improvements (MR+T) (MR+T) 42-41 Mississippi River Tributary Dams and Lakes (MR+T) 42-18 Mississquoi River at Richford, Vt. (NAN) 2-37 Missouri National Recreational River, Nebr. and S. Dak. (MRO) 21-5, 21-12 Missouri River, Mo. (MR+T) 42-17 Missouri River at New Haven, Mo. (MRK) 20-23 Missouri River, Aten, Nebr. (MRO) 21-21 Missouri River, Bank Protection, Greenwood, S. Dak. (MRO) 21-19 Missouri River, Bank Stabilization, Fort Benton, Mont. (MRO) 21-18 Missouri River, Garrison Dam to Lake Oahe, N. Dak. (MRO) 21-5, 21-12 Missouri River, Kenslers Bend, Nebr. to Sioux City, Iowa (MRO) 21-5, 21-12 Missouri River Levee System, Iowa, Nebr., Kans., and Mo. (Rulo, Nebr. to Mouth) (MRK) 20-7, 20-15, 20-18, 20-21, 20-22 Missouri River Levee System, Iowa, Nebr., Kans., and Mo. (Sioux City, Iowa, to Rulo, Nebr.) (MRO) 21-6, 21-12, 21-15, 21-16, 21-20 Missouri River, Marina, Sioux City, Iowa (MRO) 21-20 Missouri River, Niobrara, Nebr. (MRO) 21-21 Missouri River, Sioux City, Iowa, to Fort Benton, Mont. (MRO)21-15 Missouri River, Sioux City, Iowa, to Mouth (Rulo, Nebr., to Mouth) (MRK) 20-2, 20-14, 20-17, 20-19, 20-20 Missouri River, Sioux City, Iowa to Rulo, Nebr. (MRO) 21-11, 21-13, 21-14 Missouri River, Sioux City, Iowa, to Rulo, Nebr., Terminal Facilities (MRO) 21-16 Mobile Bay, Ala. to New Orleans, La. (SAM) 10-36 Mobile Harbor, Ala. (SAM) 10-10, 10-29, 10-37 Moccasin Springs, Mo. (LMS) 14-15 Mojave River Dam, Calif. (SPL) 33-13, 33-19, 33-24 Mokelumne River, Calif. (SPK) 35-21 Molalla River at Milk Creek Location, Oreg. (NPP) 37-51 Molalla River at Ressel Location, Oreg. (NPP) 37-51 Moline, Ill. (NCR) 28-5, 28-9, 28-12 Moline Harbor, Ill. (NCD) 29-9 Monongahela River, Pa. and W. Va. Locks and Dams (ORP) 26-2, 26-13, 26-16, 26-19, 26-20 Monoosnoc Brook, Mass. (NED) 1-46, 1-47 Monoosnoc Lake, Mass. (NED) 1-46, 1-47 Monroe Bay and Creek, Va. (NAB) 4-6, 4-22, 4-28 Monroe Floodwall, La. (LMK) 12-5, 12-7, 12-9, 12-12 Monroe Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-24, 31-51, 31-68 Monroe Lake, Ind. (ORL) 24-13, 24-21, 24-32 Montcalm, W. Va. (ORH) 25-26 Monterey Harbor, Calif. (SPN) 34-19 Montgomery Locks and Dam, Pa. (ORD) 22-1, 22-6 Montour Falls, N.Y. (NCB) 32-14 Moore Haven Lock, Fla. (SAJ) 9-52 Moorefield, W. Va. (NAB) 4-40 Moores Ferry, Va. (ORH) 25-23, 25-28 Moorhead, Minn. (NCS) 27-19 Moosabec Bar, Maine (NED) 1-39 Morehead, Ky. (ORL) 24-23 Morehead City Harbor, N.C. (SAW) 6-5, 6-15 Morgan City and Vicinity, La. (LMN) 11-42 Morgantown Lock and Dam, W. Va. (ORP) 26-19 Morganza Floodway, La. (MR+T) 42-46 Moriches Inlet, N.Y. (NAN) 2-6, 2-24, 2-29, 2-34 Mormon Slough, Calif. (SPK) 35-23 Morrison, Colo. (MRO) 21-21 Morrison Creek Stream Group, Calif. (SPK) 35-14 Morristown Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 32-38 Morro Bay Harbor, Calif. (SPL) 33-26 Moscow, Ohio (ORL) 24-30, 24-36 Mosquito Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, Ohio (ORP) 26-8, 26-14 Moss Bluff Lock, Fla. (SAJ) 9-56 Moss Landing Harbor, Calif. (SPN) 34-3, 34-13 Mott, N. Dak. (MRO) 21-21 Mound City Locks and Dam, Ill. (ORD) 22-9 Mounds and Mound City, Ill. (LMM) 13-10 Moundsville, W. Va. (ORP) 26-21, 26-24 Mount Clemens, Clinton River, Mich. (NCE) 31-80 Mountain Brook Dam, N.H. (NED) 1-50 Mountain Park (Tom Steed Lake), Red Rvier Basin, Okla. (SWT) 19-12, 19-35 Mouth of Yazoo River, Miss. (LMK) 12-11 Mt. Baldy, Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore, Ind. (NCC) 30-6, 30-10, 30-13 Mt. Carmel, Ill. (ORL) 24-34, 24-35 Mt. Holly, N.J. (NAP) 3-30 Mt. Morris Lake, N.Y. (NCB) 32-18, 32-24 Mud and Basket Slough, Rickreall Creek, Oreg. (NPP) 37-50 Mud Creek, Broken Bow, Nebr. (MRO) 21-21 Mud Creek Channel Improvement, Okla. (SWT) 19-27 Mud Lake Area, Idaho (NPW) 39-13 Mud Lake Pumping Station, Tenn. (MR+T) 42-25 Mud Mountain Dam, Wash. (NPS) 38-12, 38-18, 38-24 Mud River, W. Va. (ORH) 25-23, 25-28 Muddy Creek Dam, Pa. (ORP) 26-24 Muddy Hook and Tyler Coves, Md. (NAB) 4-32, 4-33 Mulberry Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-25 Mullet Key, Fla. (SAJ) 9-51 Multnomah Channel, Oreg. (NPP) 37-7, 37-26, 37-34, 37-42 Multnomah Drainage District 1, Oreg. (NPP) 37-45, 37-48, 37-50 Muncie, Ind. (ORL) 24-34, 24-35 Munday Floodway, Tex. (SWF) 16-21 Murder and Burnt Corn Creeks, Brewton, Ala. (SAM) 10-45 Murderkill River, Del. (NAP) 3-11, 3-22 Murfreesboro, Tenn. (ORN) 23-20 Murfreesboro Dam and Lake (LMK) 12-12 Murray Lock & Dam (No. 7), Ark. (SWL) 18-3, 18-13 Murrells Inlet, S.C. (SAN) 7-6, 7-11, 7-15 Muscatatuck River, Crothersville, Ind: (ORL) 24-34 Muscatine, Iowa (NCR) 28-5, 28-9, 28-13 Muscatine, Iowa, (Mad Creek) (NCR) 28-15 Muscatine Harbor, Iowa (NCD) 29-10 Muscatine Island L. and D. D., Louisa D. D. No. 13, Iowa (NCR) 28-14, 28-15 Muskegon Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-25, 31-51, 31-68 Muskingum River, Ohio (ORH) 25-20 Muskingum River Lakes, Ohio (ORH) 25-11, 25-18 Mustinka River, Minn. (NCS) 27-19, 27-20 Myers Chuck Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-12 Mystic, Conn. (NED) 1-50 Mystic River, Conn. (NED) 1-39 Mystic River, Mass. (NED) 1-37, 1-39 1-22 INDEX N Nagel Drainage District, Iowa (MRO) 21-20 Naknek River, Alaska (NPA) 40-12 Namo River, Territory of Guam (POD) 36-6, 36-8 Nan Cove, Md. (NAB) 4-33 Nandua Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-25 Nansemond River, Va. Nanticoke River, Md. (NAB) 4-33 Nanticoke River at Bivalve, Md. (NAB) 4-32, 4-33 Nanticoke River (including Northwest Fork), Del. and Md. (NAB) 4-32, 4-33 Nantucket (Harbor of Refuge), Mass. (NED) 1-39 Napa River, Calif. (SPN) 34-3, 34-13, 34-16 Napa River Basin, Calif. (SPN) 34-20 Napatree Breach, R.I. (NED) 1-50 Narragansett Pier, R.I. (NED) 1-50 Narraguagus River, Maine (NED) 1-39 Narrows Dam-Lake Greeson, Ark. (LMK) 12-4, 12-6, 12-12 Narrows of Lake Champlain, N.Y. and Vt. (NAN) 2-27, 2-25, 2-29 Nashua, N.H. (NED) 1-22, 1-46, 1-47 Nantasket Beach, Mass. (NED) 1-41 Natchez Port Area, Miss. (LMK) 12-12 Natchitoches Parish, La. (LMN) 11-41, 11-42 Navajo Reservoir, N. Mex. (SPL) 33-21 Navarro Mills Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-8, 16-15, 16-19 Navasota Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-21 Navigation Work under Special Authorization (NAN) 2-12 Navigation Work under Special Authorization (Calcasieu Pass Channel in Old River Bend at Cameron, La.) (LMN) 11-38 Nawiliwili Harbor,, Hawaii (POD) 36-11, 36-12 Nawiliwili Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-11, 36-12 Neabsco Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-33 Neah Bay, Wash. (NPS) 38-5, 38-16, 38-22 Neale Sound, Md. (NAB) 4-6, 4-22, 4-29 Near Dardanelle, Arkansas River, Ark. (SWL) 18-20 Near Springfield on Sangamon River, Ill. (NCR) 28-15 Neavitt Harbor, Md. (NAB) 4-33 Neches River and Tributaries, Salt Water Barrier at Beaumont, Tex. (SWG) 15-6, 15-14, 15-23 Needles, Calif. (SPL) 33-29, 33-30 Neehalem Bay, Oreg. (NPP) 37-7, 37-26, 37-34 Nemaha River, Elk Creek, Nebr. (MRK) 20-11 Neodesha Lake, Kans. (SWL) (SWT) 18-16, 19-32 Neon-Fleming, Ky. (ORL) 24-34, 23-35 Neuse River, N.C. (SAW) 6-21 Neuse River Basin, N.C. (SAW) 6-10, 6-23 Neva and Olga Straits, Alaska (NPA) 40-12 Neville Island, Pa. (ORP) 26-21, 26-24 New Albany, Ind. (ORL) 24-29, 24-36, 24-37 New Albin, Iowa (NCS) 27-20 New Amsterdam, Ind. (ORL) 24-30, 24-36 New Bedford and Fairhaven Harbors, Mass. (NED) 1-39 New Bedford, Fairhaven, and Acushnet, Mass. (NED) 1-19, 1-30 New Boston Harbor, Ill. (NCD) 29-10 New Buffalo Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-25, 31-51, 31-68 New Bullards Bar, Calif. (SPK) 35-23 New Cumberland, W. Va. (ORP) 26-21, 26-24 New Cumberland Locks and Dam, Stratton, Ohio (ORD) 22-1, 22-6 New Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-39 New Harmony, Ind. (ORL) 24-30, 24-36 New Harmony Bridge, Ill. and Ind. (ORL) 24-31, 24-29, 24-35 New Haven Breakwater, Conn. (NED) 1-39 New Haven Harbor, Conn. (NED) 1-8, 1-26, 1-37 New Hope Lake (B. Everett Jordan Dam and Lake, N.C. (SAW)6-8, 6-13, 6-16 New Jersey Intracoastal Waterway (NAP) 3-11, 3-22 New Jersey Pierhead Channel, N.J. (NAN) 2-34 New Kensington and Parnassus, Pa. (Allegheny River) (ORP) 26-21, 26-24 New London, Conn. (NED) 1-20, 1-31, 1-36 New London Harbor, Conn. (NED) 1-39 New Madrid Harbor, Mo. (LMM) 13-2, 13-6, 13-8 New Martinsville, W. Va. (ORH) 25-21, 25-27 New Matamoras, Ohio (ORH) 25-21, 25-27 New Melones Lake, Calif. (SPK) 35-13 New Orleans to Venice, La. Hurricane Protection (LMN) 11-20, 11-27, 22-34 New Pass, Sarasota, Fla. (SAJ) 9-10, 9-30, 3-38 New Richmond, Ohio (ORL) 24-30, 24-36 New River, Fla. (SAJ) 9-49, 9-50 New River, N.C. (SAW) 6-24 New River, Onslow County, N.C. (SAW) 6-24 New River, Va. and W. Va. (ORH) 25-20 New Rochelle Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-35 New York and New Jersey Channels, (NAN) 2-7, 2-25, 2-29, 2-34 New York Bight, N.Y. (NAN) 2-34 New York Harbor-Collection and Removal of Drift (NAN)2-8, 2-25, 2-29 New York Harbor-Entrance Channels and Anchorage Area (NAN) 2-9, 2-25, 2-30 New York Harbor, Supervisor of (NAN) 2-11, 2-25, 2-33 Newark, Ohio (ORH) 25-4, 25-16, 25-21, 25-26 Newark Bay, N.J. (NAN) 2-34, 2-35 Newbegun Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-21 Newburgh, Ind. (ORL) 24-34, 24-35 Newburgh Locks and Dam, Ind. (ORD) 22-1, 22-8 Newburyport Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-9, 1-26, 1-35, 1-37 Newburyport Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-9, 1-26, 1-35, 1-37 Newmarket Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-26 Newport, Ark. (SWL) 18-20 Newport, Ky. (ORL) 24-29, 24-34, 24-35 Newport, Ohio (ORH) 25-21, 25-27 Newport Bay Harbor, Calif. (SPL) 33-3, 33-17, 33-22 Newport Beach, Calif. (SPL) 33-7, 33-31 Newport Harbor, R.I. (NED) 1-39 Newport News, Va. (NAO) 5-23 Newport News Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-25 Newry-Old Pickens Dam and Lake, S.C. (SAS) 8-18 Newt Graham Lock and Dam, Okla. (SWL) (SWT) 18-14, 19-4 Newtown Creek, N.Y. (NAN) 2-35 Niagara Remedial Works, N.Y. (NCB) 32-38 Niagara River, N.Y. (NCB) 32-38, 32-44 Niantic Bay and Harbor, Conn. (NED) 1-39 Niblick, Mason J., Levee, Ind. (ORL) 24-4, 24-19, 24-29, 24-35 Nicholasville, (Townfolk) Vicinity, Ky. (ORL) 24-34 Nichols, N.Y. (NAB) 4-38, 4-39, 4-40 Nickajack Lock and Dam, Tenn. (ORN) 23-17 Nimrod Lake, Ark. (SWL) 18-5, 18-9, 18-16 Ninilchik Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-4, 40-9, 40-10 Nishnabotna River at Hamburg, Iowa (MRO) 21-21 Nixon Creek, Tenn. (LMM) 13-10 Nolin Lake, Ky. (ORL) 24-13, 24-21, 24-32 Nome Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-9, 40-11 Nomini Bay and Creek, Va. (NAB) 4-32, 4-33 Nonconnah Blvd., Nonconnah Creek, Tenn. (LMM) 13-4, 13-7, 13-9 Nookagee Lake, Mass. (NED) 1-46, 1-47 Norfolk, Nebr. (MRO) 21-19, 21-22 Norfolk Floodwall, Va. (NAO) 5-26 Norfolk Harbor, Va. (NAO) 5-6, 5-17, 5-20, 5-24 I-23 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 Norfork Lake, Ark. (SWL) 18-6, 18-9, 18-19 Normal, Ky. (ORH) 25-21, 25-27 Norman Lake (Lake Thunderbird), Okla. (SWT) 19-12 Norrell Lock & Dam (No. 1) & Entrance Channel, Ark. (SWL) 18-3, 18-13 North Adams, Mass. (NAN) 2-37 North Alexander Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (LMS) 14-17 North Andover and Lawrance, Mass. (NED) 1-50 North Branch of Kokosing River Lake, Ohio (ORH) 25-11, 25-18 North Canaan, Conn. (NED) 1-45, 1-47 North Ellenville, N.Y. (NAN) 2-37 North Fork of Pound River Lake, Va. (ORH) 25-12, 25-18 North Fork of Toutle River, Wash. (NPP) 37-16 North Fork, Pit River at Alturas, Calif. (SPK) 35-23 North Hampton Beach, North Hampton, N.H. (NED) 1-41 North Hartland Lake, Vt. (NED) 1-14, 1-28, 1-43 North Little Rock, Arkansas River, Ark. (SWL) 18-20 North Mankato, Minn. (NCS) 27-20 North Nashua River, Mass. (NED) 1-19, 1-30, 1-36, 1-46 North Nashua River, Lancaster, Mass. (NED) 1-47 North Platte River, Bank Stabilization, Minatare, Nebr. (MRO) 21-19 North Scituate Beach, Scituate, Mass. (NED) 1-41 North Second St., Memphis, Tenn. (Wolf River Bridge)(LMM) 13-5, 13-7, 13-9 North Shore of Long Island, Suffolk County, N.Y. (NAN) 2-36 North Springfield Lake, Vt. (NED) 1-14, 1-28, 1-43 North Stratford, N.H. (NED) 1-44 North Wildwood, N.J. (NAP) 3-29 Northhampton, Mass. (NED) 1-22, 1-44, 1-47 Northeast (Cape Fear) River, N.C. (SAW) 6-21, 6-24 Northeast Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-39 Northeast River, Md. (NAB) 4-32, 4-33 Northfield Brook Lake, Conn. (NED) 1-17, 1-30, 1-45 Northport Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-35 Northport Harbor, Wis. (NCE) 31-79 Norwalk, Conn. (NED) 1-22, 1-47 Norwalk Harbor, Conn. (NED) 1-9, 1-26 Norwalk-Wilton, Conn. (NED) 1-50 Norwich, Conn. (NED) 1-47 Norwich, N.Y. (NAB) 4-40 Nottoway River, Va. (NAO) 5-8, 5-17, 5-21 Noxubee River, Miss. (SAM) 10-43 Noyo River and Harbor, Calif. (SPN) 34-4, 34-13, 34-16 Nutwood Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (LMS) 14-7, 14-11,, 14-14 O 0. C. Fisher Damand Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-8, 16-15, 16-19 Oahe Dam-Lake Oahe, Missouri River Basin S. Dak. and N. Dak. (MRO) 21-9, 21-13 Oak Bluffs Town Beach, Mass. (NED) 1-41 Oak Orchard Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 32-11, 32-23 Oakdale, Pa. (ORP) 26-24 Oakford Special Drainage District (NCR) 28-14, 28-15 Oakland Beach, Warwick, R.I. (NED) 1-11, 1-27, 1-35 Oakland Harbor, Calif. (SPN) 34-3, 34-13, 34-16 Obey River, Tenn. (ORN) 23-18 Obion River, Tenn. (LMM) 13-10 O'Brien, T.J., Lock and Dam, Ill. (NCR) 28-18, 28-19 Occoquan Creek, Va. (NAB) 4-33 Occohannock Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-25 Ocean Beach, Calif. (SPL) 33-26 Ocean City, N.J. (NAP) 3-29 Ocean City Harbor and Inlet and Sinepuxent Bay, Md. (NAB) 4-6, 4-22, 4-28 Oceana, W. Va. (ORH) 25-4, 25-16, 25-26 Oceanside, Calif. (SPL) 33-6, 33-18, 33-23 Oceanside Harbor, Calif. (SPL) 33-4, 33-17, 33-22 Ocholockonee (Ochlockney) River, Ga. and Fla. (SAM) 10-43 Oconto Harbor, Wis. (NCE) 31-79 Ocracoke Inlet, N.C. (SAW) 6-5, 6-15 Ocracoke Island, N.C. (SAW) 6-24 Ofu Small Boat Harbor, American Samoa (POD) 36-12 Ogdensburg Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 32-11, 32-23, 32-33 Ohio River, Ill. and Ky. (MR+T) 42-17 Ohio River Basin (Huntington District) (ORH) 25-12, 2518, 25-21, 25-23, 25-24, 25-25 Ohio River Basin (Louisville Dist.)(ORL) 24-13, 24-21, 24-23, 24-29, 24-32 Ohio River Basin (Nashville District) (ORN) 23-7, 23-14 Ohio River Basin (Pittsburgh District) (ORP) 26-9, 26-15, 26-17, 26-21, 26-22 Ohio River, Locks and Dams (ORD) 22-1, 22-4, 22-6 Ohio River, Open Channel Work (ORD) 22-3, 22-4, 22-10 Oil City, Pa. (ORP) 26-24 Okabena Creek at Worthington, Minn. (NCR) 28-15 Okanogan and Pend Oreille Rivers (NPS) 38-27 Okanogan River, Wash. (NPS) 38-11, 38-28 Okanogan River, Omak, Wash. (NPS) 38-9, 38-18, 38-23 Okanogan River, Oroville, Wash. (NPS) 38-9, 39-18, 38-23 Okatibbee Lake, Miss. (SAM) 10-16, 10-31, 10-40 Okeechobee Waterway, Fla. (SAJ) 9-10, 9-30, 9-38, 9-48 Oklahoma City Floodway, Okla. (SWT) 19-26, 19-27 Oklawaha River, Fla. (SAJ) 9-11, 9-31, 9-39 Olcott Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 32-11, 32-23, 32-33 Old Field Swamp, N.C. (SAN) (SAW) 6-24, 7-9 Old Field Swamp, Fairmont, N.C. (SAW) 6-25 Old Harbor, Kodiak Island, Alaska (NPA) 40-12 Old Hickory Lock and Dam, Tenn. (ORN) 23-20 Old River, Calif. (SPK) 35-21 Old River, La. (MR+T) 42-5, 42-25, 42-46 Old River, Standard Revetments (MR+T) 42-29 Old Town, Maine, (NED) 1-47 Old Town Creek, Miss. (SAM) 10-43 Old Town Creek, Colonial Heights, Va. (NAO) 5-15 Oldmans Creek, N.J. (NAP) 3-28 Olean, N.Y. (Allegheny River) (ORP) 26-21 Olean, N.Y. (ORP) 26-24 Olive Hille, Ky. (ORH) 25-26 Olympia Harbor, Wash. (NPS) 38-26, 38-27 Omaha, Nebr. (MRO) 21-19, 21-22 Omaha Marina, Omaha, Nebr. (MRO) 21-2 Onaga Lake, Kans. (MRK) 20-7, 20-15 Onancock River, Va. (NAO) 5-25 102 River, Pickering, Mo. (MRK) 20-11 Onondaga Creek, Nedrow, N.Y. (NCB) 32-41 Ontonagon Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-26, 31-52, 31-69 Ooloogah Lake, Okla. (SWL) (SWT) 18-16, 19-9. 19-17 Oostanaula and Coosawatee River, Ga. (SAM) 10-43 Opekiska Lock and Dam, W. Va. (ORP) 26-19 Open Channel Work, Ohio River (ORD) (ORP) 22-3, 22-4, 22-10, 26-2 Open River Lewiston to Johnson Bar Landing (NPW) 39-20 Open River Pasco to Lewiston (NPW) 39-21 Optima Lake, Okla. (SWT) 19-9, 19-17 Orange River, Fla. (SAJ) 9-50 Oregon Slough (North Portland Harbor), Oreg. (NPP) 37-42 I-24 INDEX Orleans, Ind. (ORL) 24-36 Oro Grande Wash Channel Improvements, Calif. (SPL) 33-29, 33-30 Orowoc Creek, N.Y. (NAN) 2-35 Orwell Reservoir (Ottertail River) (NCS) 27-19 Osage River, Mo., Lock and Dam (MRK) 20-20 Osawatomie, Kans. (MRK) 20-21, 20-22, 20-23 Osceola Harbor, Ark. (LMM) 13-2, 13-6, 13-8 Oswego Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 32-11, 32-23, 32-34, 32-44 Ottawa, Kans. (MRO) 21-21, 20-22, 20-23 Ottawa, Ohio (NCB) 32-41 Ottawa River Harbora, Mich. and Ohio (NCB) 32-38 Otter Brook Lake, N.H. (NED) 1-15, 1-29, 1-43 Otter Creek, Vt. (NAN) 2-35 Otter Tail River, Minn. (NCS) 27-19, 27-20 Ottumwa, Iowa (NCR) 28-16 Ouachita and Black Rivers, Ark. and La. (Felsenthal Canal) (LMK) 12-11 Ouachita and Black Rivers below Camden, Ark. (LMK) 12-2, 12-6, 12-8, 12-18 Ouachita River and Tributaries, Ark. and La. (LMK) 12-3, 12-8 Ouachita River Levees, La. (LMK) 12-5, 12-7, 12-12 Overton-Red River Waterway, La. (LMN) 11-13, 11-25, 11-32 Owasco Inlet and Outlet, Montville and Dry Creek, State Ditch and Crane Brook, N.Y. (NCB) 32-41 Owensboro, Ky. (ORL) 24-29, 24-36 Owl's Head Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-39 Oxford, Md. (NAB) 4-35 Oxford, N.Y. (NAB) 4-15, 4-25, 4-37 Oyster Channel, Va. (NAO) 5-24, 5-25 Oyster Creek, Tex. (SWG) 15-28 Ozan Creek, Ark. (LMK) 12-12 Ozark-Jeta Taylor Lock and Dam (No. 12), Ark. (SWL) 18-6, 18-10 Ozona, Fla. (SAJ) 9-50 P Paducah, Ky. (ORL) 24-29, 24-34, 24-35 Pagan River, Va. (NAO) 5-25 Pago Pago to Nuuuli, American Samoa (POD) 36-13 Paint Creek at Chillicothe, Ohio (ORH) 25-26 Paint Creek at Washington Court House, Ohio (ORH) 25-26 Paint Creek Lake, Ohio (ORH) 25-12, 25-18, 25-23 Paint Rock River, Ala. (ORN) 23-19 Painted Post, N.Y. (NAB) 4-37, 4-38, 4-40 Painted Rock Dam, Ariz. (SPL) 33-9, 33-18, 33-23 Paintsville Lake, Ky. (ORH) 25-12, 25-18 Pajaro River, Calif. (SPN) 34-20 Pajaro River Basin, Calif. (SPN) 34-10, 34-14, 34-21 Palm Beach, Fla. (SAJ) 9-50 Palm Beach County, Fla., from Lake Worth Inlet to South Lake Worth Inlet (SAJ) 9-51 Palm Beach County, Fla., from Martin County Line to Lake Worth Inlet and from South Lake Worth Inlet to Broward County Line (SAJ) 9-23, 9-32, 9-44 Palm Beach Harbor, Fla. (SAJ) 9-12, 9-31, 9-39 Palouse River, Wash. (NPW) 39-13 Pamlico and Tar Rivers, N.C. (SAW) 6-21 Pamunkey River, Va. (NAO) 5-25 Panacea Harbor, Fla. (SAM) 10-43 Panama City Harbor, Fla. (SAM) 10-43 Pantego Creek and Cucklers Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-24 Panther Creek, Curdsville, Ky. (ORL) 24-34, 24-35 Panther Creek Lake, W.Va. (ORH) 25-28 Papillion Creek and Tributaries Lakes, Nebr. (MRO) 21-6, 21-12 Parish Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-32, 4-33 Park River, N.Dak. (NCS) 27-20 Park River, Hartford, Conn. (NED) 1-15, 1-29, 1-36, 1-44 Parker Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-25 Parkersburg, W.Va. (ORH) 25-21, 25-26, 25-27 Parrotts Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-25 Pascagoula Harbor, Miss. (SAM) 10-12, 10-30, 30-38 Pascagoula River, Miss. (SAM) 10-43 Pasquotank River, N.C. (SAW) 6-24 Pass Christian, Miss. (SAM) 10-43 Pass Christian Harbor, Miss. (SAM) 10-43 Pass Manchac, La. (LMN) 11-38 Pass-a-Grille Pass, Fla. (SAJ) 9-49, 9-50 Passaic River, N.J. (NAN) 2-34 Passaic River, Basin, N.J. and N.Y., Phase I (NAN) 2-17, 2-26, 2-31 Passamaquoddy Tidal Power Project, Maine (NED) 1-49 Pat Mayse Lake, Tex. (SWT) 19-9, 19-17 Patchogue River, Conn. (NED) 1-37, 1-39 Patoka Lake, Ind. (ORL) 24-14, 24-21, 24-32 Patoka River at Jasper, Ind. (ORL) 24-34 Patriot, Ind. (ORL) 24-30, 24-36 Pattonsburg Lake, Mo. (MRK) 20-23 Patuxent River, Md. (NAB) 4-33 Pawcatuck, Conn. (NED) 1-22, 1-47 Pawcatuck, River, R.I. and Conn. (NED) 1-39, 1-50 Pawtucket, R.I. (NED) 1-50 Pawtucket, Cove, R.I. (NED) 1-39 Pawtucket, River, Warwick, R.I. (NED) 1-49 Pax, W.Va. (ORH) 25-26 Payette Valley, Idaho (NPW) 39-13 Peacock Creek, Liberty County, Ga. (SAS) 8-17 Pearl River, Miss. and La. (SAM) 10-13, 10-30, 10-38, 10-42 Pearl River, Miss. and La. Jackson, Miss. (SAM) 10-45, Pearl River, Miss., Edinburg to Jackson (SAM) 10-43 Pearson-Skubitz Big Hill Lake, Kans. (SWT) 19-9, 19-17, 19-20 Pebble Creek, Scribner, Nebr. (MRO) 21-22 Pecan Bayou Lake, Pecan Bayou, Tex. (SWF) 16-21 Peconic River, N.Y. (NAN) 2-35 Pecos, Texas (SWA) 17-15 Peekskill Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-35 Pekin-LaMarsh Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (NCR) 28-14, 28- 16 Pelican Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-12 Pembina, N. Dak. (NCS) 27-20 Pembina River, N. Dak. (NCS) 27-7 Pembina River Lake, N. Dak. (NCS) 27-21 Pembroke Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-21 Pender, Nebr. (MRO) 21-22 Pendleton, Oreg. (NPP) 37-51 Pendleton Levees, Oreg. (NPP) 37-51 Peninsula Drainage District 1, Oreg. (NPP) 37-45, 37-48, 37-50 Peninsula Drainage District 2, Oreg. (NPP) 37-45, 37-48, 37-50 Penny Slough, Ill. (NCR) 28-16 Penny Slough Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (NCR) 28-14 Penobscot River, Maine (NED) 1-39 Pensacola Bay, Fla. to Mobile Bay, Ala. (SAM) 10-36 Pensacola Harbor, Fla. (SAM) 10-13, 10-30. 10-38 Pensacola Lake, Okla. (SWL) 18-16, 19-13, 19-18 Pensaukee Harbor, Wis. (NCE) 31-79 Pensaukee Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-26, 31-52, 31-69 Peoria, Ill. (NCC) 28-16 Peoria, Lock and Dam, Ill. (NCC) 28-18, 28-19 Pepin Harbor, Wis. (NCD) 29-9 I-25 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 Pepper Creek, Del. (NAP) 3-27, 3-28 Pepperell Cove, Maine (NED) 1-39 Perdido Pass Channel, Ala. (SAM) 10-14, 10-30, 10-39 Permanent International Association of Navigation Congress (PIANC) 46-1 Perquimans River, N.C. (SAW) 6-21, 6-24 Perry County Drainage and Levee Districts Nos. 1, 2, and 3, Mo. (LMS) 14-7, 14-11, 14-14 Perry Lake, Kans. (MRK) 20-8, 20-15, 20-21 Perry Lake Area (Road Improvements) Kans. (MRK) 20-8, 20-15 Perth Amboy, N.J. (NAN) 2-36 Perth Amboy Anchorage, N.J. (NAN) 2-34 Petaluma River, Calif. (SPN) 34-5, 34-13 Petersburg Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-12 Petit Anse, Tigre, and Carlin Bayous, La. (LMN) 11-13, 11-25, 11-32 Petit Jean River, Ark. (SWL) 18-20 Petoskey Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-79 Peyton Creek, Tex. (SWG) 15-28 Phillips Lake, Mass. (NED) 1-19, 1-30, 1-36, 1-46 Philpott Lake, Va. (SAW- 6-12, 6-13, 6-17 Phoeniz, Ariz., and Vicinity (including New River) (SPL) 33-9, 33-18, 33-23 Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program (Kansas City Dist) (MRK) 20-8, 20-15, 20-18 Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program (Omaha Dist) (MRO) 21-6, 21- 14, 21-17 Pickwick Landing Lock and Dam, Tenn. (ORN) 23-17 Pierce, Nebr. (MRO) 21-19, 21-22 Pig Island Cut, Maine (NED) 1-37, 1-39 Pike Island Locks and Dam, W.Va. (ORD) 22-1, 22-6 Pike Island, Minn. 27-18 Pilot Rock, Oreg. (NPP) 37-51 Pinal Creek Channel Improvements (Globe), Ariz., (SPL) 33-29 Pine and Mathews Canyons Dams, Nev. (SPL) 33-13, 33-19, 33-24 Pine Bluff, Ark. (LMK) 12-12 Pine Creek, Angle Inlet, Minn. (NCS) 27-18 Pine Creek Lake, Okla. (SWT) 19-10, 19-17 Pine Flat Lake and Kings River, Calif. (SPK) 35-10, 35-17 Pine Ford Lake, Mo. (LMS) 14-6, 14-11 Pine Mountain Lake, Ark. (SWL) 18-5, 18-9 Pine River, Mich. (NCE) 31-79 Pine River Reservoir, Minn. (NCS) 27-17 Pinellas County, Fla. (SAJ) 9-23, 9-33, 9-44 Pinetops, Town Creek, Edgecombe County, N.C. (SAW) 6-25 Pineville, Ky. (ORN) 23-19 Pineville, La. (LMN) 11-41, 11-42 Pinole Creek, Calif. (SPN) 34-20 Pinon Canyon Dam, Trinidad, Colo. (SWA) 17-15 Pioneer Lake, Kans. (MRK) 20-23 Pipestem Lake, N.Dak. (MRO) 21-6, 21-12 Pithlachascotee River, Fla. (SAJ) 9-49 Pittsburgh, Pa. (Golden Triangle) (ORP) 26-21, 26-24 Pittsburgh, Pa. (North Side) (ORP) 26-21, 26-24 Pittsburgh, Pa. (The Strip) (ORP) 26-21, 26-24 Pittsburgh Harbor, Pa. (ORP) 26-20 Pittsfield, Mass. (NED) 1-45 Placer Creek, Idaho (NPS) 38-10, 38-18, 38-23 Plainview Local Flood Protection Project (SWF) 16-21 Platte River, Mo., Channel Improvement (MRK) 20-23 Platte River and Lost Creek, Schuyler, Nebr. (MRO) 21-22 Platte River, Bank Protection, Louisville, Nebr. (MRO) 21-19 Platte River, M.U.D. Protection, Cedar Island, Nebr. (MRO) 21-19 Platte River near Schuyler, Nebr. (MRO) 21-22 Plattsburgh Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-35 Pleasant Bay, Mass. (NED) 1-39 Pleasant River, Maine (NED) 1-39 Pleasantown Floodway, Tex. (SWF) 16-21 Plum Creek, Ky. (ORL) 24-34 Plum Creek, Bank Stabilization, Aurora, Colo. (MRO) 21-19 Plum Island, Mass. (NED) 1-41 Plymouth, Pa. (NAB) 4-40 Plymouth Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-39 Plymouth Town, Mass. (NED) 1-11 Poca, W.Va. (ORH) 25-23, 25-28 Pocasset River, Johnston, R.I. (NED) 1-49 Pocatello, Idaho (NPW) 39-13, 39-14, 39-15 Pocomoke River, Md. (NAB) 4-33 Pohoiki Bay, Hawaii (POD) 36-12 Point Lookout Harbor (Au Gres River), Mich. (NCE) 31-27, 31-52, 31-69 Point Place, Toledo, Ohio (NCB) 32-18, 32-24 Point Pleasant, W.Va. (ORL) 25-21, 25-26, 25-27 Pokegama Reservoir, Minn. (NCS) 27-17 Polecat Creek Channel Improvement, Okla. (SWT) 19-26 Pollock Rip Shoals, Nantucket Sound, Mass. (NED) 1-39 Poloa Area, American Samoa (POD) 36-13 Polson Bay, Flathead Lake, Mont. (NPS) 38-27 Pomeroy, Ohio (ORL) 25-21, 25-27 Pomme De Terre Lake, Mo. (MRK) 20-9, 20-16, 20-21 Pomona Lake, Kans. (MRK) 20-9, 20-16, 20-21 Ponce. P.R. (SAJ) 9-45 Ponce De Leon Inlet, Fla. (SAJ) 9-12, 9-31, 9-39 Ponce Harbor, P.R. (SAJ) 9-12, 9-31, 9-39 Pontiac Diversion, R.I. (NED) 1-50 Port Alexander, Alaska (NPA) 40-12 Port Allen Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-11, 36-12 Port Angeles Harbor, Wash. (NPS) 38-26, 38-27 Port Arthur and Vicinity, Tex. Hurricane-Flood Protection (SWG) 15-10, 15-15, 15-26 Port Austin Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-79 Port Bay, N.Y. (NCB) 32-38 Port Clinton Harbor, Ohio (NCB) 32-12, 32-23, 32-34 Port Everglades Harbor, Fla. (SAJ) 9-13, 9-31, 9-40 Port Gamble Harbor, Wash. (NPS) 38-26, 38-27 Port Henry Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-35 Port Hueneme, Calif. (SPL) 33-26 Port Jefferson Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-35 Port Lions Small Boat Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-5, 40-9, 40-11 Port Mahon, Del. (NAP) 3-29 Port Ontario Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 32-12, 32-23 Port Orchard Bay, Wash. (NPS) 38-27 Port Orford, Oreg. (NPP) 37-7, 37-26, 37-34 Port Royal Harbor, S.C. (SAN) 7-7, 7-11, 7-15 Port San Luis, Calif. (SPL) 33-26 Port Sanilac Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-28, 31-52, 31-69 Port St. Joe Harbor, Fla. (SAM) 10-14, 10-30, 10-39 Port Townsend, Wash. (NPS) 38-26, 38-27 Port Washington Harbor, Wis. (NCE) 31-28, 31-52, 31-69 Port Wing Harbor, Wis. (NCE) 31-79 Portage, Pa. (ORP) 26-24 Portage Lake Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-27, 31-52, 31-69 Portchester Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-35, 2-38 Portland, Ohio (ORH) 25-21, 25-27 Portland, Ind. (ORL) 24-34, 24-37 Portland Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-9, 1-27 Portneuf River and Marsh Creek, Idaho (NPW) 39-13, 39-14, 39-15 Portsmouth Harbor and Piscataqua River, Maine and N.H. (NED) 1-9, Portsmouth Harbor, Va. Channel to Nansemond Ordnance Depot (NAO) 5-25 Portsmouth-New Boston, Ohio (ORH) 25-21, 25-26, 25-28 Portugues and Bucana Rivers, P.R. (SAJ) 9-27, 9-33, 9-45 I-26 INDEX Portville, N.Y. (Allagheny River) (ORP) 26-21, 26-24 Posten Bayou, Ark. and La. (LMN) 11-40, 11-42 Poteau River Navigation, Ark. and Okla. (SWT) 19-4, 19-15, 19-21 Poteet Floodway, Tex. (SWF) 16-21 Potomac and Anacostia Rivers, D.C., Collection and Removal of Drift (NAB) 4-7, 4-22, 4-29 Potomac Estuary Pilot Water Treatment Plant, D.C. (NAB) 4-19, 4-26, 4-32, 4-39 Potomac River and Tributaries at and below Washington. D.C., Elimination of Waterchestnut (NAB) 4-33 Potomac River at Alexandria, Va. (NAB) 4-33 Potomac River at Lower Cedar Point, Md. (NAB) 4-33 Potomac River at Mount Vernon, Va. (NAB) 4-33 Potomac River below Washington, D.C. (NAB) 4-33 Potomac River North Side of Washington Channel, D.C. (NAB) 4-34 Potowomut River, R.I. (NED) 1-39 Pottstown and Vicinity, Pa. (NAP) 3-15, 3-23 Powhatan Point, Ohio (ORP) 26-21, 26-25 Prairie and Silver Creek, Grand Island, Nebr. (MRO) 21-22 Prairie Du Chien, Wis. (NCS) 27-7, 27-14 Prairie Du Chien Harbor, Wis. (NCD) 29-9 Prairie du Pont Levee and Sanitary District, Ill. (LMS) 14-17 Prairie du Rocher and Vicinity, Ill. (LMS) 14-18 Prattville, Ala. (SAM) 10-45 Pre-Authorization Studies for Beach Erosion Control Activities Alaska District (NPA) 40-6 Buffalo, N.Y., District (NCB) 32-16 Charleston, S.C., District (SAN) 7-9 Chicago, Ill., District (NCC) 30-7 Detroit, Mich., District (NCE) 31-37 Jacksonville, Fla., District (SAJ) 9-24 New England Division (NED) 1-42 New York, N.Y., District (NAN) 2-13 Pacific Ocean Division (POD) 36-5 Philadelphia, Pa. District (NAP) 3-29 Pre-Authorization Studies for Flood Control Activities Albuquerque, N.Mex., District (SWA) 17-11 Baltimore, Md., District (NAB) 4-19 Buffalo, N.Y., District (NCB) 32-42 Charleston, S.C., District (SAN) 7-18 Detroit, Mich., District (NCE) 31-41 Fort Worth, Tex., District (SWF) 16-12 Galveston, Tex., District (SWG) 15-12 Huntington, W.Va., District (ORH) 25-29 Jacksonville, Fla., District (SAJ) 9-57 Little Rock, Ark., District (SWL) 18-5 Los Angeles, Calif., District (SPL) 33-31 Louisville, Ky., District (ORL) 24-38 Memphis, Tenn., District (LMM) 13-5 Mobile, Ala., District (SAM) 10-45 Nashville, Tenn., District (ORN) 23-7 New England Division (NED) 1-48 New York, N.Y., District (NAN) 2-22 Omaha, Nebr., District (NRO) 21-22 Pacific Ocean Division (POD) 36-6 Philadelphia, Pa. District (NAP) 3-20, 3-30 Pittsburgh, Pa., District (ORP) 26-26 Portland, Oreg., District (NPP) 37-52 Rock Island, Ill. District (NCR) 28-17 Sacramento, Calif., District (SPK) 35-13 San Francisco, Calif., District (SPN) 34-12 Savannah, Ga., District (SAS) 8-8 Seattle, Wash., District (NPS) 38-29 St. Paul, Minn., District (NCS) 27-22 Tulsa, Okla., District (SWT) 19-28 Vicksburg. Miss., District (ILMK) 12-5 Walla Walla, Wash., District (NPW) 39-16 Wilmington, N.C.. District (SAW) 6-25 Pre-Authorization Studies for Navigation Activities Alaska District (NPA) 40-13 Baltimore, Md., District (NAB) 4-10 Buffalo, N.Y., District (NCB) 32-39 Charleston, S.C., District (SAN) 7-8 Chicago, Ill., District (NCC) 30-6 Detroit, Mich., District (NCE) 31-37 Galveston, Tex., District (SWG) 15-9 Jacksonville, Fla., District (SAJ) 9-19 Memphis, Tenn., District (LMM) 13-3 Mobile, Ala., District (SAM) 10-44 Nashville, Tenn., District (ORN) 23-5 New England Division (NED) 1-41 New Orleans, La., District (LMN) 11-16 New York, N.Y., District (NAN) 2-12 Pacific Ocean Division (POD) 36-4 Philadelphia. Pa. District (NAP) 3-14 Portland, Oreg., District (NPP) 37-43 Rock Island, Ill.. District (NCR) 28-3 San Francisco, Calif., District (SPN) 34-9 Savannah, Ga., District (SAS) 8-17 Seattle, Wash., District (NPS) 38-28 St. Paul, Minn., District (NCS) 27-18 Vicksburg. Miss., District (LMK) 12-3 Wilmington, N.C., District (SAW) 6-22 Presque Isle Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-28, 31-53, 31-70 Presque Isle Peninsula, Erie, Pa. (NCB) 32-15, 32-24, 32-36 Prestile Stream, Blaine, Maine (NED) 1-48 Preston Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (LMS) 14-18 Prestonburg, Ky. (ORH) 25-26 Prestonville, Ky. (ORL) 24-30, 24-36 Priest, J. Percy. Dam and Reservoir, Tenn. (ORN) 23-8, 23-11,23-19 Priest Rapids Dam, Wash. (NAS) 38-31 Princeton, W.Va. (ORH) 25-26, 25-28 Princeville Area, Oreg. (NPP) 37-51 Proctor, Vt. (NAN) 2-37, 2-38 Proctor, W.Va. (ORP) 26-21, 26-25 Proctor Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-9, 16-15, 16-19 Proctorville, Ohio (ORH) 25-21, 25-28 Prompton Lake. Pa. (NAP) 3-18, 3-23 Prospect Beach, West Haven, Conn. (NED) 1-41 Providence River and Harbor, R.I. (NED) 1-39 Provincetown Beach (Herring Cove), Mass. (NED) 1-50 Provincetown Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-39, 1-50 Pueblo Arkansas River. Colo. (Floodway Levee Extension) (SWA) 17-15 Puget Sound and its Tributary Waters, Wash. (NPS) 38-5, 38-16, 38-22 Pulaski County, Ark. (SWL) 18-20 Pullman, Palouse. Wash. (NPW) 39-15 Pultneyville Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 32-38 Pungo Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-24 Pungo River, N.C. (SAW) 6-24 Pungoteague Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-11 Punta Salinas, P.R. (SAJ) 9-24, 9-33, 9-44 Punxsutawney., Ohio River Basin. Pa. (ORP) 26-4. 26-13 Punxsutawney. Pa. (Allegheny River Basin) (ORP) 26-21 Put In Bay, Ohio (NCB) 32-38 I-27 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 Q Quail Wash Levee, Joshua Tree, Calif. (SPL) 33-29, 33-30 Queens Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-25 Queenstown Harbor, Md. (NAB) 4-34 Quillayute River, Wash. (NPS) 38-6, 38-16, 38-22 Quinby Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-25 Quincy Harbor, Ill. (NCD) 29-10 Quincy Shore Beach, Quincy, Mass. (NED) 1-41 Quincy, Ill., Harbor Access Channel (NCR) 28-10 R R. D. Bailey Lake, W.Va. (ORH) 25-13, 25-18 Raccoon Creek, N.J. (NAP) 3-12, 3-22, 3-26 Raccoon Levee, Ind. (ORL) 24-30, 24-36 Racine, Ohio (ORH) 25-21, 25-28 Racine Harbor, Wis. (NCE) 31-29, 31-53, 31-70 Racine Locks and Dam, Ohio (ORD) 22-2, 22-7 Rahway, N.J. (NAN) 2-37 Rahway River, N.J. (NAN) 2-35 Rahway, South Branch, N.J. (NAN) 2-37 Rainer Drainage District, Oreg. (NPP) 37-45, 37-48, 37-50 Rainey, Henry T., Dam, Ill. (NCD) 29-8 Rancocas Creek at Mt. Holly, N.J. (NAP) 3-20 Rancocas River, N.J. (NAP) 3-28 Randleman Lake, N.C. (SAW) 6-8, 6-16 Rapid City, Cedar Canyon Dam, S.Dak. (MRO) 21-18 Rapid Creek, Rapid City, S.Dak. (MRO) 21-7, 21-12, 21-19 Rapide Croche Lock and Dam, Wis. (NCE) 31-78 Rappahannock River, Va. (NAO) 5-25 Rappahannock River at Bowlers Wharf, Va. (NAO) 5-25 Rappahannock Shoal Channel, Va. (NAO) 5-2, 5-19 Raritan Bay and Sandy Hook Bay, N.J. (NAN) 2-18, 2-26, 2-31 Raritan River, N.J. (NAN) 2-9, 2-25, 2-30 Raritan River to Arthur Kill Cutoff Channel, N.J. (NAN) 2-35 Rathbun Lake, Iowa (MRK) 20-9, 20-16 Rathbun Lake Fish Hatchery (MRK) 20-23 Ravenswood, W.Va. (ORH) 25-21, 25-28 Ray Roberts Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-8, 16-15, 16-19 Rayburn, Sam, Dam and Reservoir, Tex. (SWF) 16-12, 16-15, 16-19 Raystown Lake, Pa. (NAB) 4-12, 4-23, 4-31 Red Brook Harbor, Bourne, Mass. (NED) 1-39 Red Creek, N.Y. (NCB) 32-41 Red Dale Gulch, Rapid City, S.Dak. (MRO) 21-22 Red Lake and Red Lake River, Minn. (NCS) 27-18 Red Lake River, Minn., including Clearwater River, Minn. (NCS) 27-8. 27-14 Red Oak, Iowa (MRO) 21-20, 21-22 Red River, Tenn. (ORN) 23-18 Red River at East Grand Forks, Minn. (NCS) 27-19 Red River at Fargo, N.Dak. (NCS) 27-19 Red River at Grand Forks, N.Dak. (NCS) 27-19 Red River Backwater (MRT) 42-42, 42-48 Red River below Denison Dam including Little River Basin, Okla. and Ark. (SWL) 18-12 Red River below Denison Dam, Levees and Bank Stabilization (New Orleans Dist.) (LMN) 11-21, 11-27, 11-35, 11-40 Red River below Denison Dam (New Orleans Dist.) (LMN) 11-20, 11-40. 11-41 Red River below Denison Dam (Tulsa District) (SWT) 19-10, 19-21, 19-26 Red River below Fulton, Ark. (LMN) 11-38 Red River Dikes (MRT) 42-30 Red River Emergency Bank Protection (LMN) 11-13, 11-26, 11-33 Red River from Fulton, Ark., to Mouth of Washita River (SWT) 19-4 Red River in Vicinity of Shreveport, La. (LMN) 11-41, 11-42 Red River Lake, Ky. (ORL) 24-37 Red River of the North, Minn. and N.Dak. (NCS) 27-18 Red River of the North, Argusville, N.Dak. (NCS) 27-22 Red River of the North, at Oslo, Minn. (NCS) 27-9, 27-14 Red River of the North, at Pembina, N.Dak. (NCS) 27-21 Red River of the North, Breckinridge, Minn. (NCS) 27-22 Red River of the North Drainage Basin, Minn., S.Dak. and N.Dak. (NCS) 27-8, 27-14, 27-19 Red River of the North, Halstad, Minn. (NCS) 27-22 Red River Parish, La. (LMN) 11-41, 11-42 Red River Plan, Okla. and Tex. (SWT) 19-23 Red River Standard Revetments (MRT) 42-30 Red River Waterway, La., Ark., Okla., and Tex. (LMN) 11-38 Red River Waterway, La., Ark., Okla., and Tex., Index, Ark. to Denison Dam (Tulsa District) (SWT).19-4, 19-15 Red River Waterway, Shreveport, La., to Daingerfield, Tex. (LMN) 11-38 Red River Waterway-Shreveport, La., to Index, Ark. (LMN) 11- 21, 11-27, 11-35 Red Rock Dam and Lake Red Rock, Iowa (NCR) 28-6, 28-9, 28-13 Red Run Drain-Lower Clinton River, Mich. (NCE) 31-37, 31-56, 31-74 Red Wing Harbor, Minn. (NCD) 29-9 Redbank Creek Lake, Pa. (ORP) 26-25 Reddies River Lake, N.C. (SAN) 7-19 Redmond, John, Dam and Reservoir, Kans. (SWT) 19-8, 19-16 Redondo Beach Harbor (King Harbor) Calif. (SPL) 33-4, 33-17, 33-22 Redwood City Harbor, Calif. (SPN) 34-5, 34-13, 34-17 Redwood Creek, Humboldt County, Calif. (SPN) 34-20 Redwood River, Minn. (NCS) 27-20 Redwood River below Marshall, Minn. (NCS) 27-21 Reeds Bay Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-12 Reedsport Levees, Oreg. (NPP) 37-51 Reedy River, S.C. (SAN) 7-19 Reelfoot Lake-Lake No. 9, Tenn. and Ky. (MRT) 42-8, 42-17, 42-25 Reese River, Battle Mountain, Nev. (SPK) 35-23 Reevesville, Ill. (ORL) 24-29, 24-34, 24-35 Regulation of Hydraulic Mining and Preparation of Plans (CDC) 44-1, 44-4, 44-5 Regulatory and Sunken Vessel Removal Activities 48-1 Rehoboth Beach to Indian River Inlet, Del. (NAP) 3-29 Removal of Aquatic Growth from Navigable Waters in the State of Florida (SAJ) 9-14, 9-31, 9-40, 9-49 Removal of Sunken Vessels 48-1 Removing Snags and Wrecks from Mississippi River below Mouth of Missouri-River and from Old and Atchafalaya Rivers (LMK) (LMM) 12-11, 13-10 Removing Water Hyacinths, La. (LMN) 11-14, 11-26, 11-33 Removing Water Hyacinths, Mobile District (SAM) 10-15, 10-30, 10-39 Rend Lake, Ill. (LMS) 14-7, 14-11, 14-14 Reno Beach-Howard Farms Area, Ohio (NCB) 32-19, 32-24, 32-41 Research Institute, 51-1 Reservoirs at Headwaters of Mississippi River, Minn. (NCS) 27-2, 27-13, 27-16 Restoration of Indian Fishing Grounds, Bonneville, ()reg. (NPP) 37-55 Revere Beach, Mass. (NED) 1-11, 1-27, 1-35 Reynoldsville, Pa. (ORP) 26-25 Rheem Creek, Calif. (SPN) 34-20 I-28 Rhodes Point to Tylerton, Md. (NAB) 4-34 Rice Creek, Fla. (SAJ) 9-50 Richard B. Russell Dam and Lake, Ga. and S.C. (Formerly Trotters Shoals Lake) (SAS) 8-10, 8-13, 8-16 Richland Creek, Ill. (LMS) 14-18 Richland Lake, Mo. (MRK) 20-23 Richmond, Va. (NAO) 5-13, 5-18, 5-22 Richmond Filtration Plant, Va. (NAO) 5-13, 5-18, 5-22 Richmond Harbor, Calif. (SPN) 34-5, 34-13, 34-17 Richmond Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-39 Richmond's Island Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-39 Ridgecrest, Calif. (SPL) 33-30 Ridgeway, Pa. (Allegheny River Basin) (ORP) 26-21 Ridgeway, Pa. (Elk Creek) (ORP) 26-25 Ridgeway and Vicinity, Pa. (On Clarion River) (ORP) 26-25 Rio Grande Basin, N.Mex. (SWA) 17-4, 17-12, 17-14, 17-14 Rio Grande Floodway, N. Mex. (SWA) 17-6, 17-13, 17-15 Ripley, Ohio (ORH) 25-21, 25-26, 25-28 Ririe Lake, Idaho (NPW) 39-15 Rising Sun, Ind. (ORL) 24030, 24-36 River Rouge, Mich. (NCE) 31-38, 31-56, 31-74 Riverdale, Mass. (NED) 1-44, 1-48 Riverland Levee District, Mo. (LMS) 14-18 Riverland Levees, Calif. (SPL) 33-29, 33-30 Riverview, W.Va. (ORH) 25-21, 25-28 Ronoak Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-21 Roanoak Island, N.C. (SAW) 6-25 Roanoke River, N.C. (SAW) 6-21 Roanoke River Basin, Va. and N.C., John H. Kerr Dam and Reservoir (SAW) 6-12, 6-17, 6-23 Roanoke River Basin, Va. and N.C., Philpott Lake, Va. (SAW) 6-12, 6-17, 6-23 Roaring River, N.C. (SAN) 7-19 Robert S. Kerr Lock and Dam, Okla. (SWL) (SWT) 18-14, 19-13, 19-18, 19-22 Robert S. Kerr Marine Terminal, Sallisaw, Okla. (SWT) 19-22 Rochester and McCleary's Bluff Levee, Ill. (ORL) 24-29, 24-34, 29-35 Rochester, Minn. (NCS) 27-9, 27-14 Rochester, Pa. (ORP) 26-21, 26-25 Rochester Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 32-12, 32-23, 32-34 Rock Hall Harbor, Md. (NAB) 4-7, 4-22, 4-29 Rock Island, Ill. (NCR) 28-14, 28-16 Rock Island District, (NCD) 29-6 Rock Island Harbor, Ill. (NCD) 29-9 Rock River Agricultural Levees, Ill. (NCR) 28-6, 28-9, 28-13 Rockford, Ill. (NCR) 28-6, 28-9, 28-13 Rockland Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-37, 1-39 Rockland Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-12, 16-19 Rockport, Ind. (ORL) 24-30, 24-34, 24-36 Rockport Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-39 Rockport Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-39 Rocky Ford Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (NCR) 28-16 Rocky Fork, Ohio (ORH) 25-23, 25-25, 25-28 Rocky Pass, Alaska (NPA) 40-12 Rocky River Harbor, Ohio (NBC) 32-13, 32-23, 32-35 Rodeo Creek, Calif. (SPN) 34-20 Rogue River Harbor at Gold Beach, Oreg. (NPP) 37-8, 37-26, 37-35 Roland Drainage District, Arkansas River, Ark. (SWL) 18-20 Rollison Channel, N.C. (SAW) 6-20, 6-21 Rome, Ga. (SAM) 10-45 Rome, Ind. (ORL) 24-30, 24-36 Rome, N.Y. (NAN) 2-37 Rondout Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-35 Root Creek, Bolivar, N.Y. (ORP) 26-5, 26-13, 26-32 Rose Creek Channel Improvements, San Diego, Calif. (SPL) 33-29, 33-31 NDEX Roseau River, Minn. (NCS) 27-9, 27-14 Rosedale Harbor, Miss. (LMK) 12-3, 12-6, 12-8 Rosedale, N.Y. (NAN) 2-37 Rosendale, N.Y. (NAN) 2-37 Roseville, Ohio (ORH) 25-5, 25-16, 25-21, 25-26 Rosiclare, Ill. (ORL) 24-34, 24-35 Rossview Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, Tenn. and Ky. (ORN) 23-19 Rota Harbor, Northern Marianas (POD) 36-4, 36-8 Rouge River, Mich. (NCE) 31-29, 31-53, 31-70 Rough River Lake and Channel Improvements, Ky. (ORL) 24-15, 24-21, 24-32 Rough River, Ky. (ORL) 24-28, 24-29 Rouses Point, Lake Champlain, N.Y. (NAN) 2-35 Rouseville, Pa. (ORP) 26-25 Rowlesburg Lake, W.Va. (ORP) 26-25 Royal River, Maine (NED) 1-37, 1-39 Ruby River, Wheatly Bridge, near Twin Bridges, Mont. (MRO) 21-18 Rufus Woods Lake, Was. (NPS) 38-13, 38-19, 38-24 Rush River, N.Dak. (NCS) 27-19, 27-20 Rushford, Minn. (NCS) 27-20, 27-21 Russell, Ky. (ORH) 25-26, 25-28 Russell and Allison Levee, Ill. (ORL) 24-29 Russell, Richard B., Dam and Lake, Ga. and S.C. (SAS) 8-10, 8-13, 8-16 Russian River Basin, Calif. (SPN) 34-10, 34-15, 34-18, 34-20 Rutland, Otter Creek, Vt. (NAN) 2-37 Rutledge Hollow Creek Channel Improvement, Poteet, Tex. (SWF) 16-21 Rye Harbor, N.H. (NED) 1-39 S Sabine-Neches Waterway, Tex. (SWG) 15-7, 15-14, 15-23, 15-29, 15-31, 15-35 Sabine River and Tributaries, Tex. (Echo to Morgan Bluff) (SWG) 15-28 Sabula, Iowa (NCR) 28-14, 28-16 Sackets Harbor, N.Y. (NBC) 32-13, 32-23, 32-35, 32-44 Saco, Mont. (MRO) 21-18, 21-22 Saco River, Maine (NED) 1-39, 1-50 Sacramento River, Calif. (CDC) 44-3, 44-4, 44-5, 44-6 Sacramento River, Calif. (SPK) 35-2, 35-16, 35-19, 35-20 Sacramento River and Tributaries, Calif. (CDC) 44-1, 44-4 Sacramento River and Tributaries, Calif., from Collinsville to Shasta Dam (SPK) 35-11, 35-17, 35-19, 35-22 Sacred Heart Hospital, Yankton, S.Dak. (MRO) 21-19, 21-22 Sag Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-35 Saginaw River, Mich. (NCE) 31-30, 31-39, 31-54, 31-56, 31-70, 31-74 Saint John River, Fort Kent, Maine (NED) 1-49 Saint John River Basin, Maine (NED) 1-20 Sakonnet Harbor, R.I. (NED) 1-9, 1-27, 1-35 Sakonnet River, R.I. (NED) 1-39 Salamanca, N.Y. (ORP) 26-25 Salamonie Lake, Ind. (ORL) 24-15, 24-21 Salem Church Lake, Va. (NAO) 5-26 Salem Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-37, 1-39 Salem River, N.J. (NAP) 3-28 Salina, Kans. (MRK) 20-21, 20-23 Salinas River, Calif. (SPN) 34-20 Saline County, Ark. (SWL) 18-20 Saline Point, La. (LMN) 11-41, 11-42 I-29 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 Saline River, Ark. (LMK) 12-11 Saline River and Tributaries, Ill. (ORL) 24-5, 24-19, 24-34 Salisbury, Conn. (NED) 1-45 Salkahatchie River, S.C. (SAN) 7-17 Salmon Creek at Oakridge, Oreg. (NPP) 37-51 Salmon River, Alaska (NPA) 40-6, 40-13 Salmon River, Colchester, Conn. (NED) 1-15, 1-29, 1-36, 1-44 Salmon River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-42 Salt Creek, Barnard, Kans. (MRK) 20-23 Salt Creek and Tributaries, Nebr. (MRO) 21-7, 21-12 Salt Creek Lake, Ohio (ORH) 25-28 Salt Lake City, Jordan River, Utah (SPK) 35-23 Saluda River, S.C. (SAN) 7-9, 7-19 Salyersville, Ky. (ORL) 24-36 Sam Rayburn Dam and Reservoir, Tex. (SWF) 16-12, 16-15, 16-19 Sammamish River, Wash. (NPS) 38-28 San Antonio Channel Improvement, Tex. (SWF) 16-9, 16-16, 16-19 San Antonio Floodway, Tex. (SWF) 16-21 San Diego Creek, Alice, Tex. (SWG) 15-28 San Diego Harbor, Calif. (SPL) 33-25, 33-26 San Diego River and Mission Bay, Calif. (SPL) 33-5, 33-17, 33-22 San Diego River Channel and Levees, Calif. (SPL) 33-29 San Diego River (Mission Valley), Calif. (SPL) 33-30 San Francisco Bay and Delta Model, Calif. (SPN) 34-6, 34-14 San Francisco Bay to Stockton, Calif. (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels) (SPK) (SPN) 34-6, 34-14, 35-2, 35-16 San Francisco Harbor, Calif. (SPN) 34-7, 34-14, 34-19 San Francisco Harbor and Bay (Removal of Drift), Calif. (SPN) 34-7, 34-14 San Francisco Marina (Gas House Cove), Calif. (SPN) 34-19 San Gabriel River, Tex. (SWF) 16-9, 16-16, 16-19 San Gabriel River to Newport Bay (Surfside-Sunset and Newport Beach), Calif. (SPL) 33-26 San Jacinto River Levee and Bautista Creek Channel, Calif. (SPL) 33-29, 33-30 San Joaquin River, Calif. (SPK) 35-3, 35-16, 35-20 San Juan, P.R. (SAJ) 9-51 San Juan Dam, Calif. (SPL) 33-30 San Juan Harbor, P.R. (SAJ) 9-17, 9-31, 9-41 San Leandro Creek, Calif. (SPN) 34-20 San Leandro Marina, Calif. (SPN) 34-19 San Leandro Marina (Breakwater), Calif. (SPN) 34-19 San Lorenzo Creek, Calif. (SPN) 34-20 San Lorenzo River, Calif. (SPN) 34-20 San Luis Rey River, Calif. (SPL) 33-14, 33-19, 33-24 San Pablo Bay and Mare Island Strait, Calif. (SPN) 34-7, 34-14, 34-18 San Rafael Creek, Calif. (SPN) 34-8, 34-14, 34-18 Sand Creek Channel Improvement, Kans. (SWT) 19-26, 19-27 Sand Hill Cove Beach, R.I. (NED) 1-41 Sand Hill River, Minn. (NCS) 27-19, 27-20 Sand Island, Hawaii (POD) 36-5, 36-8 Sand Lake, Okla. (SWT) 19-27 Sandburg Creek, Spring Glen, N.Y. (NAN) 2-37 Sandusky Harbor, Ohio (NCB) 32-13, 32-23, 32-25 Sandusky River, Ohio (NCB) 32-38 Sandy Bay, Cape Ann, Mass. (NED) 1-50 Sandy Bay (Harbor of Refuge), Cape Ann, Mass. (NED) 1-39 Sandy Drainage District, Oreg. (NPP) 37-45, 37-48, 37-50 Sandy Hook Bay, N.J. (NAN) 2-35 Sandy Hook Bay at Leonardo, N.J. (NAN) 2-35 Sandy Hook Channel, N.Y. (NAN) 2-34 Sandy Lake Reservoir, Minn. (NCS) 27-17 Sanford Reservoir (Lake Meredith), Canadian River Basin, Okla. (SWT) 19-12, 19-35 Sangamon River (Mouth), Ill. (NCR) 28-16 Sanitary District of Beardstown, Ill. (NCR) 28-14 Santa Ana River Basin (and Orange County), Calif. (SPL) 33-14, 33-19, 33-24, 33-28, 33-30 Santa Ana River Basin, Calif. (SPL) 33-30 Santa Barbara Harbor, Calif. (SPL) 33-5, 33-17, 33-22 Santa Clara River Levee Improvement, Calif. (SPL) 33-29, 33-30 Santa Cruz County, Calif. (SPN) 34-9 Santa Cruz Harbor, Calif. (SPN) 34-8, 34-14 Santa Fe River and Arroyo Mascaras, N.Mex. (SWA) 17-7, 17-13, 17-14 Santa Maria Valley Levees, Calif. (SPL) 33-15, 33-19, 33-25, 33-29 Santa Paula Creek Channel and Debris Basins (including Mud Creek), Calif. (SPL) 33-15, 33-19, 33-25 Santa Rosa Dam and Lake, N.Mex. (SWA) 17-8, 17-13, 17-14 Santa Rosa Wash (at Momolikot Dam and Lake St. Clair), Ariz. (SPL) 33-29 Santee River, N.C. and S.C. (SAN) 7-17 Sapelo Harbor, Ga. (SAS) 8-17 Sardis, Ohio (ORH) 25-25 Sardis Lake, Miss. (MR+T) 42-18, 42-55 Sasona River, Maine (NED) 1-39 Sasco Hill Beach, Fairfield, Conn. (NED) 1-41 Satilla River, Ga. (SAS) 8-6, 8-17 Saugatuck Harbor and Kalamazoo River, Mich. (NCE) 31-33, 31-54, 31-73 Saugerties Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-35 Sauk Rapids, Minn. Benton County Ditch No. 3 (NCS) 27-22 Sauvie Island Drainage District, Oreg. (NPP) 37-45, 37-50 Savage River Dam, Md. (NAB) 4-40 Savanna Harbor, Ill. (NCD) 29-9 Savannah Harbor, Ga. (SAS) 8-4, 8-12, 8-14 Savannah River above Augusta, Ga. (SAS) 8-17 Savannah River at Augusta, Ga. (SAS) 8-17 Savannah River Basin, Ga. and S.C. (SAS) 8-9, 8-18 Savannah River below Augusta, Ga. (SAS) 8-6, 8-12, 8-15 Saw Mill River at Elmsford and Greenburgh, N.Y. (NAN) 2-19, 2-26, 2-31 Sawmill Branch, S.C. (SAN) 7-9, 7-19 Saxon Harbor, Wis. (NCE) 31-33, 31-55, 31-73 Saxonville, Mass. (NED) 1-22, 1-46, 1-48 Sayers, Foster Joseph, Dam, Pa. (NAB) 4-18, 4-25 Saylorville Lake, Iowa (NCR) 28-6, 28-9, 28-13 Scajaquada Creek, N.Y. (NCB) 32-19, 32-24 Scappoose Drainage District, Oreg. (NPP) 37-1, 37-28, 37-38, 37-45 Scarboro River, Maine (NED) 1-39 Schuyler, Nebr. (MRO) 21-19 Schuylkill River, Pa. (NAP) 3-12, 3-22, 3-26 Schuylkill River above Fairmont Dam, Pa. (NAP) 3-28 Scioto River at Portsmouth, Ohio (ORH) 25-20 Sciotoville, Ohio (ORH) 25-28 Scituate, Mass. (NED) 1-22 Scituate Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-37, 1-39 Scott County Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (LMS) 14-18 Scottsville, Va. (NAO) 5-15 Scranton, Buffalo, N.Dak. (MRO) 21-18 Scranton, Pa. (NAB) 4-35, 4-36, 4-40 Scuppernong River, N.C. (SAW) 6-11, 6-16, 6-21 Seahorn Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (NCR) 28-14, 28-16 Searsport Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-39 Seaside Park, Conn. (NED) 1-41 Seattle Harbor, Wash. (NPS) 38-6, 38-17, 38-22 Sebasticook River, Hartland, Maine (NED) 1-49 Sebewaing, Mich. (NCE) 31-40, 31-56, 31-74 Sebewaing River, Mich. (NCE) 31-33, 31-55, 31-73 Seekonk River, R.I. (NED) 1-39 Seldovia Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-12 Selkirk Shore State Park, N.Y. (NCB) 32-40 I-30 INDEX Sergius Whitestone, Alaska (NPA) 40-12 Sespe Creek at Fillmore, Calif. (SPL) 33-15, 33-20, 33-25 Sesuit Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-10, 1-27, 1-35 Sevier River near Redmond, Utah (SPK) 35-23 Seward, Nebr. (MRK) 20-23 Seward Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-12 Shad Landing State Park, Md. (NAB) 4-34 Shallotte River, N.C. (SAW) 6-21 Shannon Hills, Ark. (SWL) 18-20 Shark River, N.J. (NAN) 2-10, 2-25, 2-30, 2-34 Shawneetown, Ill. (ORL) 24-29, 24-34, 24-35 Sheboygan Harbor, Wis. (NCE) 31-34, 31-55, 31-73 Sheepshead Bay, N.Y. (NAN) 2-35 Sheffield, Mass. (NED) 1-45 Sheffield Lake Community Park, Ohio (NCB) 32-44 Shelburne, N.H. (NED) 1-22, 1-48 Shell Creek, Nebr. (MRO) 21-22 Shelley Area, Idaho (NPW) 39-13, 39-14, 39-15 Shelton Creek, Wash. (NPS) 38-28 Shenango River Lake, Pa. and Ohio (ORP) 26-9, 26-15 Sheridan, Wyo. (MRO) 21-18, 21-22 Sherwood Island State Park, Conn. (NED) 1-42 Sheyenne River, N.Dak. (NCS) 27-9, 27-14, 27-19, 27-20 Shidler Lake, Arkansas River Basin, Okla. (SWT) 19-10, 19-17, 19-21 Shields River, near Clyde Park, Mont. (MRO) 21-22 Shilshole Bay, Seattle, Wash. (NPS) 38-26, 38-27 Shinnecock Inlet, N.Y. (NAN) 2-35 Shipyard River, S.C. (SAN) 7-7, 7-12, 7-15 Shoal Harbor and Compton Creek, N.J. (NAN) 2-35 Shoals, Ind. (ORL) 24-36 Shooters Island, N.Y. and N.J. (NAN) 2-10, 2-25, 2-30 Shoreline Erosion Control Work Under Special Authorization Buffalo, N.Y., District (NCB) 32-16 Detroit, Mich., District (NCE) 31-37 Galveston, Tex., District (SWG) 15-9 Jacksonville, Fla., District (SAJ) 9-24 Mobile, Ala., District (SAM) 10-16 Pittsburgh, Pa., District (ORP) 26-26 Philadelphia, Pa., District (NAP) 3-20 Portland, Oreg., District (NPP) 37-12 Seattle, Wash., District (NPS) 38-8 Wilmington, N.C., District (SAW) 6-25 Short Beach, Conn. (NED) 1-42 Shoshone River, Bank Protection, Lovell, Wyo. (MRO) 21-18 Shot Pouch Creek, S.C. (SAN) 7-9, 7-19 Shrewsbury River, N.J. (NAN) 2-35 Shufflebarger Levee, Ind. (ORL) 24-30, 24-36 Sid Simpson Project, Ill. (NCR) 28-16 Sidney, Nebr. (MRO) 21-22 Silver Beach to Cedar Beach, Conn. (NED) 1-42 Silver Lake Harbor, (SAW) 6-5, 6-15, 6-19 Simmons Bay, N.C. (SAW) 6-24 Simmons Bay Creek, N.C. (SAN) 7-9 Simpson Creek, S.C. (SAN) 7-9, 7-19 Sioux City, Iowa (MRO) 21-15, 21-20 Sioux Falls, S.Dak. (MRO) 21-18, 21-22 Sisterville, W.Va. (ORH) 25-22, 25-28 Sitka Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-12 Sixes Bridge Lake, Md. and Pa. (NAB) 4-40 Siuslaw River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-8, 37-27, 37-35 Skaggs Ferry, Black River, Ark. (SWL) 18-20 Skagit River, Wash. (NPS) 38-27 Skagit River, Wash. (Avon By-Pass) (NPS) 38-28 Skagit River, Wash. (Levee and Channel Improvements) (NPS) 38-10, 38-18, 38-23 Skagway Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-12 Skagway River, Alaska (NPA) 40-6, 40-13 Skamokawa Creek, Wash. (NPP) 37-8, 37-27, 37-35 Skamokawa Creek Area, Wash. (NPP) 37-48 Skiatook Lake, Verdigris River Basin, Okla. (SWT) 19-10, 19-17, 19-21 Skipanon Channel, Oreg. (NPP) 37-9, 37-27, 37-35 Slaughter Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-7, 4-22, 4-29 Slovan, Pa. (ORP) 26-25 Small Boat Harbor Opposite Chester, Ill. (LMS) 14-15 Small Boat Harbor Opposite Hamburg, Ill. (LMS) 14-15 Small Navigation Project at Sioux City, Iowa (MRO) 21-15 Smelt Brook, Mass. (NED) 1-48 Smith Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-34 Smith Island, Md. (NAB) 4-10 Smithfield, W.Va. (ORH) 25-26 Smithland, Ky. (ORL) 24-29, 24-36 Smithland Locks and Dam, Ky. (ORD) 22-1, 22-8 Smiths Creek (Wilmington), N.C. (SAW) 6-21 Smiths Creek, Pamlico County, N.C. (SAW) 6-21 Smiths Ferry, Pa. (ORP) 26-21, 26-25 Smithville Channel, Little Platte River, Mo. (MRK) 20-23 Smithville Lake, Mo. (MRK) 20-10, 20-16 Smyrna, Tenn. (ORN) 23-20 Smyrna River, Del. (NAP) 3-28 Snagging and Clearing Activities Albuquerque, N.Mex. District (SWA) 17-11 Buffalo, N.Y., District (NCB) 32-39, 32-42 Charleston, S.C., District (SAN) 7-18 Huntington, W.Va., District (ORH) 25-29 New England Division (NED) 1-23 Portland, Oreg., District (NPP) 37-52 Rock Island, Ill., District (NCR) 28-17 Sacramento, Calif., District (SPK) 35-13 St. Louis, Mo., District (LMS) 14-18 Walla Walla, Wash., District (NPW) 39-2 Snake River, below Warren, Minn. (NCS) 27-22 Snake River Downstream from Johnson Bar Landing, Oreg., Wash., and Idaho (NPW) 39-7, 39-10, 39-12, 39-20 Snettisham, Alaska (NPA) 40-7, 40-9, 40-11 Sny Basin, Ill. (NCR) 28-14, 28-16 Sny Island Levee Drainage District, Ill. (NCR) 28-14, 28-16 Sorcorro Diversion Channel, Tributaries of Rio Grande, New Mex. (SWA) 17-15 ' Somerville Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-10, 16-16, 16-20 Sonoma Creek, Calif. (SPN) 34-20 Souris River, Velva, N. Dak. (NCS) 27-22 South Amsterdam, Mohawk River, N.Y. (NAN) 2-37 South Bank Arkansas River, (Head Fourche Island to Pennington Bayou), Ark. (SWL) 18-20 South Bank Arkansas River, Little Rock to Pine Bluff, Ark. Tucker Lakes (SWL) 18-20 South Bank White River, Petersburg, Ind. (ORL) 24-34 South Beardstown and Valley Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (NCR) 28-16 South Beardstown Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (NCR) 28-14, 28-16 South Beloit, Ill. (NCR) 28-16 South Bristol Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-37, 1-39 South Coventry Lake, Conn. (NED) 1-50 South Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-24 South Deer Creek Levee, Okla. (SWT) 19-26 South Ellenville, N.Y. (NAN) 2-19, 2-26, 2-31 South Fork, Clearwater River, Idaho (NPW) 39-13 South Fork of Cumberland River, Ky. (ORN) 23-18 South Fork of Toutle River, Wash. (NPP) 37-16 South Haven Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-34, 31-55, 31-73 1-31 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 South Orange, N.J. (NAN) 2-20, 2-26, 2-32 South Platte River, Bank Protection, Denver, Colo. (MRO) 21-19 South Platte River Basin, Colo. (MRO) 21-7, 21-15 South Platte River Levees and Channel Improvements, Chatfield Lake to Ft. Morgan, Colo. (MRO) 21-22 South Plymouth Lake, N.Y. (NAB) 4-40 South Point, Ohio (ORH) 25-22, 25-28 South Portsmouth, Ky. (ORH) 25-22, 25-28- South Quincy Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (NCR) 28-14, 28-16 South River, N.C. (SAW) 6-21, 6-24 South River Drainage District, Mo. (NCR) 28-14, 28-16 South Slough (Charleston), Oreg. (NPP) 37-42 South Tunbridge Lake, Vt. (NED) 1-50 South Williamson, Ky. (ORH) 25-26 Southern New York Flood Control Projects (NAB) 4-12, 4-31, 4-36, 4-37, 4-38 Southport Beach, Conn. (NED) 1-42 Southport Harbor, Conn. (NED) 1-39 Southwest Harbor, Conn. (NED) 1-39 Southwestern Jefferson County, Ky. (ORL) 24-5, 24-19 Sowashee Creek, Meridian, Miss. (SAM) 10-45 Spanish Fork River, Utah (SPK) 35-23 Sprewrell Bluff Lake, Ga. (SAM) 10-25, 10-32, 10-41 Spokane, Wash. (NPS) 38-28 Spring City, Tenn. (ORN) 23-19 Spring Creek Channel Improvement, Springdale, Ark. (SWT) 19-2'7 Spring Lake Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (NCR) 28-14, 28-16 Springdale, Mass. (NED) 1-44, 1-48 Springdale Levee, Ark. (SWT) 19-26 Springer, Willliam L. Lake, Ill. (NCR) 28-16 Springfield, Mass. (NED) 1-22, 1-44, 1-48 Springfield, Tenn. (ORN) 23-20 Squantz Pond, New Fairfield, Conn. (NED) 1-18, 1-30, 1-36, 1-45 Squaw Chute at Quincy, Ill. (NCR) 28-10 St. Albans Harbor, Lake Champlain, Vt. (NAN) 2-35 St. Anthony Falls, Lower Lock and Dam, Minn. (NCD) 29-7, 29-11 St. Anthony Falls, Upper Lock, Minn. (NCD) 29-7 St. Augustine Harbor, Fla. (SAJ) 9-14, 9-31, 9-40 St. Catherines Sound, Md. (NAB) 4-7, 4-22, 4-29 St. Clair River, Mich. (NCE) 31-31, 31-54, 31-71, 31-76 St. Croix River, Maine (NED) 1-39 St. Croix River, Minn. and Wis. (NCS) 27-2, 27-13, 27-16 St. Francis and L'Anguille Rivers and Blackfish Bayou, Ark. (LMM) 13-10 St. Francis Basin, Ark. and Mo. (MR+T) 42-8, 42-25 St. Francis River and Basin, Ark. and Mo. (MR+T) 42-16, 42-49 St. Francis River Levees (MR+T) 42-44 St. George Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-34 St. James, Beaver Island, Mich. (NCE) 31-79 St. James Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-79 St. Jeromes Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-8, 4-22, 4-29 St. Johns River, Fla. (SAJ) 9-37 St. Johns River, Fla., Jacksonville to Lake Harney (SAJ) 9-15, 9-31, 9-40 St. Johns River, Fla., Jacksonville to the Ocean (SAJ) 9-37 St. Johns River, Fla., Opposite the City of Jacksonville (SAJ) 9-37 St. Jones River, Del. (NAP) 3-28 St. Joseph Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-54, 31-71, 31-82 St. Joseph River, Mich. (NCE) 31-31, 31-79 St. Louis County Drainage and Levee District No. 1, Mo. (LMS) 14-18 St. Louis District (NCD) 29-6 St. Lucie Inlet, Fla. (SAJ) 9-15, 9-31, 9-40 St. Maries, Idaho (NPS) 38-28 St. Marks River, Fla. (SAM) 10-43 St. Marys, Pa. (ORP) 26-21, 26-25 St. Marys, W. Va. (ORH) 25-28 St. Marys River, Ga. and Fla., and North River, Ga. (SAS) 8-6, 8-17 St. Marys River, Mich. (NCE) 31-32, 31-54, 31-71, 31-77 St. Michael Canal, Alaska (NPA) 40-12 St. Michaels Harbor, Md. (NAB) 4-34 St. Patricks Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-32, 4-34 St. Paul and South St. Paul, Minn. (NCS) 27-21 St. Paul District (NCD) 29-6 St. Paul Harbor, Minn. (NCD) 29-9 St. Peters Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-34 St. Petersburg Harbor, Fla. (SAJ) 9-16, 9-31, 9-41 St. Regis River, Mont. (NPS) 38-28 St. Thomas Harbor, V.I. (SAJ) 9-50 Stamford Harbor, Conn. (NED) 1-39, 1-50 Stamford, Conn. (NED) 1-20, 1-22, 1-31, 1-36 Starlings Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-5, 5-17, 5-21, 5-24 Startup, Wash. (NPS) 38-28 Starved Rock Lock and Dam, Ill. (NCR) 28-18, 28-19 State Road and Ebner Coulees, Wis. (NCS) 27-10, 27-15 Staten Island, N.Y. (NAN) 2-20, 2-26, 2-32 Staten Island Rapid Transit Railway Co. Bridge Across Arthur Kill, N.Y. (NAN) 2-35 Ste. Genevieve County Drainage and Levee District No. 1, Mo. (LMS) 14-18 Steinhatchee River, Fla. (SAJ) 9-49, 9-50 Stewart Canyon Debris Basin and Channel, Calif. (SPL) 33-29, 33-30 Stikine River, Alaska (NPA) 40-5, 40-9, 40-11 Stillagumish River, Wash. (NPS) 38-10, 38-18, 38-24, 38-27 Stillhouse Hollow Dam, Tex. (SWF) 16-10, 16-16, 16-20 Stillwater Lake, Pa. (NAB) 4-16, 4-25, 4-31 Stillwell Drainage District, Oreg. (NPP) 37-51 Stockton and Mormon Channels, Calif. (SPK) 35-21 Stockton Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-40 Stockton Lake, Mo. (MRK) 20-12, 20-16, 20-21 Stone Harbor, N.J. (NAP) 3-29 Stonehouse Creek, Kans. (MRK) 20-23 Stonewall Jackson Lake, W. Va. (ORP) 26-9, 26-15 Stonington Harlor, Conn. (NED) 1-40 Stonington Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-50 Stony Brook, Wilton, N.H. (NED) 1-48 Stony Creek, Branford, Conn. (NED) 1-40 Stratford, Conn. (NED) 1-50 Streambed Erosion Control Evaluation and Demonstration Project Huntington, W. Va., District (ORH) 25-29 Louisville, Ky., District (ORL) 24-18 New England Division (NED) 1-23 Omaha, Nebr., District (MRO) 21-10, 21-13 Pittsburgh, Pa., District (ORP) 26-26 Portland, Oreg., District (NPP) 37-12 Rock Island, Ill., District (NCR) 28-7 Seattle, Wash., District (NPS) 38-8 St. Paul, Minn., District (NCS) 27-22 Strington, Ft. Chartres and Ivy Landing, Ill. (LMS) 14-18 Stroudsburg, Pa. (NAP) 3-20 Strube Lake & Cougar Additional Unit, (South Fork McKenzie) Modification to Cougar Lake) Oreg. 37-47 Stuart Gulch Dam, Boise, Idaho (NPW) 39-15 Stumpy Point Bay, N.C. (SAW) 6-21 Sturgeon Bay and Lake Michigan Ship Canal, Wis. (NCE) 31-35, 31-55, 31-73 Sturgis, Ky. (ORL) 24-29, 24-34, 24-35 Sturgis, S. Dak. (MRO) 21-7, 21-12 Subdistrict No. 1 of Drainage Union No. 1 and Bay Island Drainage and Levee District No. 1, Ill. (NCR) 28-14, 28-16 Sucker Brook, Conn. (NED) 1-22, 1-44, 1-48 Sugar Creek Levee, Ind. (ORL) 24-30, 24-36 Sugar Hill Reservoir, N.H. (NED) 1-50 I-32 INDEX Suisun Bay Channel, Calif. (SPK) (SPN) 34-8, 34-14, 35-21 Suisun Channel, Calif. (SPK) (SPN) 34-19, 35-21 Suisun Point Channel, Calif. (SPK) 35-21 Sullivan Falls Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-40 Sulphur River, Ark. and Tex. (LMN) 11-38 Summersville Lake, W. Va. (ORH) 25-13, 25-19, 25-23 Sumpawanus (Babylon Creek) Inlet, N.Y. (NAN) 2-35 Sunbury, Pa. (NAB) 4-40 Sunken Vessel Removal 48-1 Supervision of the Harbor of Hampton Roads (Prevention of Obstructive and Injurious Deposits) (NAO) 5-8, 5-17 Supervisor of New York Harbor (NAN) 2-11, 2-25, 2-33 Surry Mountain Lake, N.H. (NED) 1-15, 1-29, 1-43 Surveillance of Northern Boundary Waters (NCE) 31-41, 31-57 Susquehanna River at and below Havre De Grace, Md. (NAB) 4-34 Susquehanna River at Williamsport, Pa. (NAB) 4-34 Susquehanna River Flood Control Projects, N.Y. and Pa. (NAB) 4-16, 4-31, 4-38, 4-39 Sutton Lake, W. Va. (ORH) 25-14, 25-19, 25-23 Suwanee River, Fla. (SAJ) 9-49, 9-50 Swanquarter Bay, N.C. (SAW) 6-22 Swanton Harbor, Vt. (NAN) 2-35, 2-38 Sweetwater River, Calif. (SPL) 33-16, 33-20, 33-25 Swift Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-21 Swiftcreek, Pitt and Craven Counties, N.C. (SAW) 6-24 Swinomish Channel, Wash. (NPS) 38-6, 38-17, 38-22 Swoyersville, and Forty Fort, Pa. (NAB) 4-40 Sykesville, Pa. (ORP) 26-25 Syracuse, N.Y. (NCB) 32-41 Syracuse, Ohio (ORH) 25-22, 25-28 T T. J. O'Brien Lock and Dam, Ill. (NCR) 28-18, 28-19 Table Rock Lake, Mo. (SWL) 18-7, 18-10, 18-19 Tacoma, Wash. (NPS) 38-10, 38-18, 38-24 Tacoma Harbor, Wash. (NPS) 38-7, 38-17, 38-22 Tahchevah Creek Detention Basin and Channel Improvements, Calif. (SPL) 33-29, 33-30 Tahquitz Creek, Calif. (SPL) 33-30 Talkeetna River, Alaska (NPA) 40-6, 40-9, 40-11 Tallahala Creek Lake, Miss. (SAM) 10-17, 10-31, 10-40 Tallahatchie and Coldwater Rivers, Miss. (LMK) 12-11 Tallapoosa River, Ala. (SAM) 10-43 Tallow Hill, Ga. (SAS) 8-18 Tamaqua, Pa. (NAP) 3-16, 3-23 Tampa and Hillsborough Bays, (SAJ) 9-42 Tampa Bay, Fla. (SAJ) 9-41 Tampa Harbor, Fla. (SAJ) 9-17, 9-32, 9-42 Tangeman, Nebr. (NAN) 2-19 Tangier Channel, Va. (NAO) 5-9, 5-17, 5-21, 5-24 Tangipahoa River, La. (LMN) 11-15, 11-26, 11-33 Tar River, N.C. (SAW) 6-24 Tar River and Tributaries, N.C. (SAW) 6-24 Tar River, Princeville, N.C. (SAW) 6-24 Tarentum, Pa. (ORP) 26-25 Tarrytown Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-35 Taskinas Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-25 Tau Small Boat Harbor, American Samoa (POD) 36-4, 36-8 Taunton River, Mass. (NED) 1-40 Tawas Bay Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-79 Taylors Bayou, Tex. (SWG) 15-11, 15-15, 15-27 Taylorsville Lake, Ky. (ORL) 24-16, 24-21 Taylorsville Ky. (ORL) 24-29, 24-36, 24-37 Teche-Vermilion Basins, La. (Water Supply) (MR+T) 42-6, 42-12, 42-25 Tell City, Ind. (ORL) 24-29, 24-34, 24-35 Tenants Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-37, 1-40 Tenastillahe Island, Oreg. (NPP) 37-48 Tenkiller Ferry Lake, Okla. (SWL) (SWT) 18-16, 19-14, 19-18, 19-22, 19-25 Tenmile Creek at Marianna, Pa. (ORP) 26-5, 26-13 Tennessee River, Tenn. Ala., and Ky. (ORN) 23-3, 23-11,23-17,23-18 Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway, Ala. and Miss. (ORN) 23-4, 23-11, 23-14 Tensas Basin, Ark. and La. (MR+T) 42-6, 42-13, 42-25 Tensas River and Bayou Macon, La. (LMK) 12-11 Terrain Analysis Center 51-1 Terre Haute (Conover Levee), Ind. (ORL) 24-34, 24-35 Terre Noire Creek, Ark. (LMK) 12-12 Terry, David D., Lock and Dam, Ark. (SWL) 18-2, 18-13 Teton River, Idaho (NPW) 39-13 Texas City and Vicinity, Tex., Hurricane-Flood Protection (SWG) 15-11, 15-15, 15-27 Texas City Channel, Tex. (SWG) 15-7, 15-14, 15-25, 15-29, 15-32, 15-36 Thames River, Conn. (NED) 1-40 Thames River Basin, Conn., R.I., and Mass. (NED) 1-21, 1-46 The Cascades Canal, Oreg. (NPP) 37-42 The Dalles-Celilo Canal, Oreg. and Wash. (NPP) 37-42 The Dalles Lock and Dam-Lake Celilo Wash. and Oreg. (NPP) 37-23, 37-30, 37-40, 37-54 The Island Lake, Vt. (NED) 1-50 Thimble Shoal Channel, Va. (NAO) 5-9, 5-17, 5-21 Thomaston Dam, Conn. (NED) 1-18, 1-30, 1-45 Three Forks, Mont. (MRO) 21-18 Three Islands Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, Tenn. (ORN) 23-19, 23-20 Three Rivers, Mass. (NED) 1-22, 1-44, 1-48 Three Rivers, Tex. (SWF) 16-10, 16-16, 16-20 Thumpertown Beach, Eastham, Mass. (NED) 1-50 Tickfaw, Natalbany, Ponchatoula, and Blood Rivers, La. (LMN) 11-38 Ticonderoga River, N.Y. (NAN) 2-35 Tijuana River Basin, Calif. (SPL) 33-30 Tilghman Island Harbor, Md. (NAB) 4-8, 4-22, 4-30 Tillamook Bay and Bar, Oreg. (NPP) 37-9, 37-27, 37-35 Tioga-Hammond Lakes, Pa. (NAB) 4-17, 4-25, 4-38, 4-39 Tionesta Lake, Ohio River Basin, Pa. (ORP) 26-10, 26-15 Toad Suck Ferry Lock & Dam (No. 8), Ark. (SWL) 18-3, 18-13 Tocks Island (Relocation of U.S. Route 209 Only) Pa. (NAP) 3-30 Tocks Island Lake, Pa. and N.Y. (NAP) 3-30 Todd Swamp, S.C. (SAN) 7-9, 7-19 Toledo Harbor, Ohio (NCB) 32-14, 32-23, 32-35 Tolu, Ky. (ORL) 24-29, 24-36 Tom Jenkins Dam, Ohio (ORH) 25-14, 25-19 Tomahawk Lake, Kans. (MRK) 20-23 Tomanovich-Salmon City, Idaho (NPW) 39-14, 39-15 Tombigbee River, Miss. and Ala. (SAM) 10-18, 10-31, 10-40 Tombigbee River Tributaries, Miss. and Ala. (SAM) 10-18, 10-31, 10-40 Toms River, N.J. (NAP) 3-28 Tongue River Lake, N.Dak. (NCS) 27-21 Topeka, Kans. (MRK) 20-21, 20-22, 20-23 Topographic Development Laboratory 51-1 Toronto Lake, Kans. (SWL) (SWT) 18-16, 19-10, 19-22, 19-24 Torrington, Conn. (NED) 1-22, 1-45, 1-48 I-33 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 Totuskey Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-26 Touchet River, Wash. (NPW) 39-13 Toutle River, Wash. (NPP) 37-15 Towanda Lake, Whitewater River Basin, Kans. (SWT) 19-10, 19-17, 19-21 Town Beach, Plymouth, Mass. (NED) 1-42 Town Bluff Dam-B. A. Steinhagen Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-12, 16-16, 16-20 Town Creek, Americus, Ga. (SAM) 10-45 Town Creek, Harrodsburg, Ky. (ORL) 24-35 Town Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-34 Town Creek, S.C. (SAN) 7-7, 7-12, 7-16 Town Neck Beach, Sandwich, Mass. (NED) 1-42 Townshend Lake, Vt. (NED) 1-16, 1-29 Trabuco Dam, Calif. (SPL) 33-30 Tradewater River, Ky. (ORL) 24-28 Tranquitas Creek, Kingsville, Tex. (SWG) 15-28 Tranters Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-24 Traverse City Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-79 Treasure Island, Mo. (LMM) 13-4, 13-6, 13-8 Treatment of Yuba River Debris Situation-Restraining Barriers, Calif. (CDC) 44-2, 44-4 Tred Avon River, Md. (NAB) 4-34 Trempealeau, Wis. (NCS) 27-18 Trent River, N.C. (SAW) 6-21, 6-24 Trenton Lake, Mo. (MRK) 20-23 Trexter Lake, Pa. (NAP) 3-19, 3-23 Trinidad Lake, Colo. (SWA) 17-9, 17-13, 17-14 Trinity River and Tributaries, Tex. (SWG) 15-8, 15-14, 15-26, 15-29, 15-32 Trinity River Project, Tex. (SWF) 16-2, 16-14, 16-20 Triplett Creek, Morehead, Ky. (ORL) 24-35 Tri-Pond Levee, Ill. (ORL) 24-30, 24-36 Trotters Shoals Lake (SAS) 8-10, 8-13, 8-16 Troublesome Creek, Hindman, Ky. (ORL) 24-34 Trousdale County, Tenn. (ORN) 23-20 Troy, Ind. (ORL) 24-30, 24-34, 24-36 Truckee River and Tributaries, Calif. and Nev. (SPK) 35-23 Truman, Harry S., Dam and Reservoir, Mo. (MRK) 20-12, 20-16, 20-21 Trumbull Lake, Conn. (NED) 1-58 Trussville, Ala. (SAM) 10-45 Truth or Consequences (Hot Springs) Unit, N. Mex. (SWA) 17-7, 17-14, 17-15 Tuscannon River, Camp Wooten, Wash. (NPW) 39-15 Tuckahoe River, Md. (NAB) 4-34 Tuckerton Creek, N.J. (NAP) 3-28 Tug and Levisa Forks of the Big Sandy River and Cumberland River, W. Va., Va., and Ky. (ORN) 23-6, 23-11 Tully Lake, Mass. (NED) 1-16, 1-29, 1-44 Tulsa and West Tulsa Levee, Okla. (SWT) 19-26, 19-27 Turkey Creek, S.C. (SAN) 7-18, 7-9, 7-19 Turner Prairie, Mill Creek, Oreg. (NPP) 37-53 Turtle Creek, Pa. (ORP) 26-25 Turtle Creek Channel Improvement, Yukon, Okla. (SWT) 19-27 Tuscon Diversion Channel, Ariz. (SPL) 33-10, 33-18, 33-23 Tuskahoma Lake, Okla. (SWT) 19-27 Tuttle Creek Lake, Kans. (MRK) 20-10, 20-16, 20-21 Tuttle Creek Lake (Road Improvement), Kans. (MRK) 20-21 Twelvemile Bayou, La. (LMN) 11-42 Twin Valley Lake, Wild Rice River, Minn. (NCS) 27-10, 27-15 Twitch Cove and Big Thorofare, Md. (NAB) 4-9, 4-23, 4-30 Two Harbors, Minn. (NCE) 31-35, 31-56, 31-74 Two Rivers Dam, N.Mex. (SWA) 17-10, 17-13 Two Rivers Harbor, Wis. (NCE) 31-36, 31-56, 31-74 Tyaskin Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-34 Tye River and South Fork of Rockfish Rivers, Va. (NAO) 5-15 Tybee Island, Ga. (SAS) 8-7, 8-12, 8-16 Tygart Beach, Va. (NAO) 5-10, 5-11, 5-17, 5-21 Tyrone, Pa. (NAB) 4-40 U Umatilla Harbor, Oreg. (NPP) 37-42 Umatilla River (ECHO), Oreg. (NPP) 37-51 Umpqua River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-9, 37-27, 37-35 Umpqua River and Tributaries, Oreg. (NPP) 37-51 Unadilla, N.Y. (NAB) 4-40 Union City Dam, Pa. (ORP) 26-11, 26-15 Union Lake, Mo. (LMS) 14-18 Union River, Maine (NED) 1-40 Union Township Drainage District, Mo. (NCR) 28-16 Union Village Dam, Vt. (NED) 1-16, 1-29, 1-43 Uniontown, Ky. (ORL) 24-29, 24-34, 24-35 Uniontown, Pa. (ORP) 26-21, 26-25 Uniontown Locks and Dam, Ky. (ORD) 22-1, 22-8 University Wash and Spring Brook, Riverside, Calif. (SPL) 33-30 Upper Chipola River, Fla., from Mariana to its mouth (SAM) 10-43 Upper Grand River, Mo. (MRK) 20-23 Upper Grays River Area, Wash. (NPP) 37-48 Upper Iowa River, Iowa (NCS) 27-21 Upper Machodoc Creek, Va. (NAB) 4-34 Upper Marlboro, Md. (NAB) 4-40 Upper Mississippi River Basin (St. Paul Dist.), Black River Lake, Wis. (NCS) 27-21 Upper Puyallup River, Wash. (NPS) 38-28 Upper River Road, Jefferson Co., Ky. (ORL) 24-34 Upper River Rough, Mich. (NCE) 31-80 Upper Thorofare, Deal Island, Md. (NAB) 4-34 Upper White River, Ark. (SWL) 18-18 Urban Areas at Alton, Ill. (LMS) 14-18 Urbana Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-26 Utica Lake, Ohio (ORH) 25-26, 25-28 Utica, Ind. (ORL) 24-29, 24-36 V Valdez Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-12 Vale, Oreg. (NPW) 39-14 Valley City Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (LMS) 14-18 Valley Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (NCR) 28-14 Van Buren, Arkansas River, Ark. (SWL) 18-20 Van Meter, Iowa (NCR) 28-14, 28-16 Vanceburg, Ky. (ORH) 25-22, 25-28 Vancouver Lake Area, Wash. (NPP) 37-14, 37-28, 37-38 Vatia Area, American Samoa (POD) 36-13 Vaughn, Mont. (MRO) 21-18 Velva, N. Dak. (NCS) 27-20, 27-21 Ventnor, Margate and Longport, N.J. (NAP) 3-29 Ventura Marina (Ventura Harbor), Calif. (SPL) 33-5, 33-18, 33-22 Ventura-Pierpont Area, Calif. (SPL) 33-26 Vermilion Harbor, Ohio (SPL) 33-14, 33-24, 33-36 I-34 INDEX Vermilion Lock, La. (Replacement of Lock) (LMN) 11-15, 11-26, 11-33 Vermillion River, Hastings, Minn. (NCS) 27-21 Verona Lake, Va. (NAB) 4-40 Vevay, Ind. (ORL) 24-30, 24-36 Vicinity of Nehalem, Oreg. (NPP) 37-51 Vicksburg Harbor, Miss. (MR+T) 42-26 Victory Lake, Vt. (NED) 1-50 Villa Park Dam, Calif. (SPL) 33-30 Village Creek, S.C. (SAN) 7-8, 7-12, 7-16 Village Creek, Jackson & Lawrence Counties, Ark. (SWL) 18-19, 18-20 Village Creek, White River, and Mayberry Levee District, Ark. (SWL) 18-12, 18-20 Village of New Athens, Ill. (LMS) 14-5, 14-11, 14-20 Vince and Little Vince Bayous, Tex. (SWG) 15-12, 15-15, 15-27 Vincennes, Ind. (ORL) 24-29, 24-34, 24-35 Vineyard Haven, Mass. (NED) 1-40 Vinton Waterway, La. (LMN) 11-39 Virginia Beach, Va. (NAO) 5-11, 5-18, 5-21 Virginia Beach Streams Canal Number 2, Va. (NAO) 5-14, 5-18, 5-22 Virginia Key and Key Biscayne, Fla. (SAJ) 9-51 W W. D. Mayo Lock and Dam, Okla. (SWT) 19-3, 19-22, 19-24 W. Kerr Scott Dam and Reservoir, N.C. (SAW) 6-11, 6-13, 6-17 W. P. Franklin Lock and Dam, Fla. (SAJ) 9-52 Wabash Railroad Bridges, Illinois River, Meredosia, and Valley City, Ill. (LMS) 14-15 Wabash River Basin, Ind., Ill., and Ohio (ORL) 24-16, 24-24, 24-33 Wabasha Harbor, Minn. (NCD) 29-9 Waccamaw River, N.C. and S.C. (SAN) 7-17 Waccamaw River and Seven Creeks, N.C. and S.C. (SAN) (SAW) 6-24, 7-9, 7-19 Waco Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-11, 16-16, 16-20 Wahkiakum County Consolidated Diking District No. 1, Wash. (NPP) 37-14, 37-28, 37-38, 37-45 Wahkiakum Co. Diking District 4, Wash. (NPP) 37-45, 37-50 Waianae Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-11, 36-12 Waikiki Beach, Hawaii (POD) 36-13 Wailoa Stream and Tributaries, Hawaii (POD) 36-16, 36-13 Waimea Beach, Hawaii (POD) 36-13 Wake Island Harbor, Wake Island (POD) 36-12 Waldo Lake Tunnel and Reregulating Works, Oreg. (NPP) 37-47, 37-55 Walla Walla, Wash., (NPW) 36-14 Wallabout Channel, N.Y. (NAN) 2-35 Wallace, W. Va. (ORP) 26-25 Wallace Channel, Pamlico Sound, N.C. (SAW) 6-21 Wallace Lake, La. (LMN) 11-22, 11-27, 11-35, 11-39, 11-41 Wallis Sands State Beach, N.H. (NED) 1-42 Wallisville Lake, Tex. (SWG) 15-8 Walluski River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-49 Walnut Bayou Channel Improvement, Ark. (SWT) 19-26, 19-27 Walnut Creek, Calif. (SPN) 34-11, 34-15, 34-23 Walter, Francis E., Dam, Pa. (NAP) 3-17, 3-23 Walter F. George Lock and Dam, Ala. and Ga. (SAM) 10-25, 10-32, 10-41 Wappapello Lake, Mo. (MR+T) 42-18, 42-55 Wappinger Creek, N.Y. (NAN) 2-35 Wappinger Creek at Pleasant Valley, N.Y. (NAN) 2-37 Ware, Mass. (NED) 1-22, 1-44, 1-48 Wareham Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-40 Wareham-Marion, Mass. (NED) 1-50 Warren River, R.I. (NED) 1-40 Warrenton Diking Districts 1, 2, and 3 Oreg. (NPP) 37-49 Warroad Harbor, Minn. (NCS) 27-18 Warroad Harbor and River, Minn. (NCS) 27-2, 27-13, 27-16 Warroad River, Wis. (NCE) 31-79 Warroad River and Bull Dog Creek, Minn. (NCS) 27-21 Warsaw, N.Y. (NCB) 32-41 Warsaw Harbor, Ill. (NCD) 29-10 Warwick Cove, R.I. (NED) 1-40 Warwick River, Md. (NAB) 4-32, 4-34 Warwood, W. Va. (ORP) 26-21, 26-25 Washington, Pa. (ORP) 26-25 Washington Aqueduct (NAB) 4-19, 4-41 Washington Canal and South River, N.J. (NAN) 2-35 Washington D.C. and Vicinity (NAB) 4-40 Washington Harbor, D.C. (NAB) 4-4, 4-23, 4-30 Washington Island, Wis. (NCE) 31-79 Washougal Area Levees, Wash. (NPP) 37-50 Water Resources Support Center (WRSC) 53-1 Waterbury, Vt. (NAN) 2-37 Waterbury Reservoir, Vt. (NAN) 2-37 Waterbury-Watertown, Conn. (NED) 1-22, 1-45, 1-48 Wateree River, S.C. (SAN) 7-17 Waterford, Hudson and Mohawk Rivers, N.Y. (NAN) 2-37 Waterloo, Iowa (NCR) 28-7, 28-9, 28-13 Waterloo, Nebr. (MRO) 21-19, 21-22 Waterway Connecting Pamlico Sound and Beaufort Harbor, S.C. (SAW) 6-5, 6-16, 6-20 Waterway Connecting Port Townsend and Oak Bay, Wash. (NCR) 28-26, 38-27 Waterway Connecting Swanquarter Bay with Deep Bay, N.C. (SAW) 6-21 Waterway Connecting Tombigbee and Tennessee Rivers, Ala. and Miss. (SAM) 10-15, 10-30, 10-39 Waterway from Empire, La., to Gulf of Mexico (LMN) 11-15, 11-26, 11-33 Waterway from Indian River Inlet to Rehoboth Bay, Del. (NAP) 3-13, 3-23 Waterway from Intracoastal Waterway to Bayou DuLac, La. (Bayous Grand Caillou and LeCarpe, La.) (LMN) 11-15, 11-26, 11-33 Waterway from Little Choptank River to Choptank River, Md. (NAB) 4-34 Waterway from White Lake to Pecan Island, La. (LMN) 11-39 Waterway-Norfolk, Va. to Sounds of N.C. (SAW) 6-21 Waterway on the Coast of Virginia (NAO) 5-10, 5-17, 5-21, 5-24 Waterways Experiment Station (WES) 45-1 Watkins Glen, N.Y. (NCB) 32-44 Watts Bar Lock and Dam, Tenn. (ORN) 23-17 Waukegan Harbor, Ill. (NCC) 30-5, 30-10, 30-13, 30-14 Waurika Lake, Red River Basin, Okla. (SWT) 19-11, 19-18, 19-21 Waverly, W. Va. (ORH) 25-22, 25-28 Wax Lake Outlet, La. (MR+T) 42-46 Waycake Creek, N.J..(NAN) 2-35 Webb District Improvement Co., Oreg. (NPP) 37-49 Webbers Falls Lock and Dam, Okla. (SWL) (SWT) 18-14, 19-14, 19-19, 19-22, 19-25 Weber River and Tributaries, Utah (SPK) 35-23 Weiser River, Weiser Area, Idaho (NPW) 39-13, 39-15 Wellfleet Harbor, mass. (NED) 1-10, 1-27, 1-35 Wells Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-40 Wells Harbor, Territory of Guam (POD) 36-12 Wellsburg, W. Va. (ORP) 26-21, 26-25 I-35 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1981 Wellsville, N.Y. (NCB) 32-41 Wellsville, Ohio, Sec. I. (ORP) 26-21, 26-25 Wellsville, Ohio, Sec. II (ORP) 26-21, 26-25 Wenatchee, Canyons 1 and 2, Wash. (NPS) 38-29 Wenatchee River, Wash. (NPS) 38-28 Wessagussett Beach, Weymouth, Mass. (NED) 1-42 West Agurs, La. (LMN) 11-22, 11-28, 11-35 West Atchalafaya Floodway, La. (MR+T) 42-14 West Branch Chisholm Creek Channel Improvement, Kans. (SWT) 19-27 West Branch of Susquehanna River, Pa. (NAB) 4-17, 4-32, 4-39 West Bridgewater, Pa. (ORP) 26-21, 26-25 West Brookfield Reservoir, Mass. (NED) 1-50 West Canaan Lake, N.H. (NED) 1-50 West Fork, W. Va. (ORH) 25-23, 25-25, 25-28 West Fork, Grand River, Mo. (MRK) 20-11 West Fork of Mill Creek Lake, Ohio (ORL) 24-16, 24-21, 24-32 West Glendive, Mont. (MRO) 21-18 West Harbor, Ohio (NCB) 32-14, 32-24 West Hickman Area, Hickman, Ky. (LMM) 13-4, 13-6, 13-8 West Hill Dam, Mass. (NED) 1-12, 1-27, 1-42 West Kentucky Tributaries, Ky. (MR+T) 42-8, 42-17, 42-25, 42-49 West Matanzas Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (NCR) 28-14 West Muddy Creek and Marys River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-50 West Nishnabotna River, Mills Co. Bridge, near Hastings, Iowa (MRO) 21-20 West Nishnabotna River, Mills Co. Bridge, near Malvern Iowa (MRO) 21-20 West Nishnabotna River, near Hancock, Iowa (MRO) 21-20 West of Morrilton, Arkansas River, Ark. (SWL) 18-20 West Oneonta Lake, N.Y. (NAB) 4-36, 4-37, 4-40 West Point, Ga. (SAM) 10-18, 10-45 West Point, Ky. (ORL) 24-29, 24-36 West Point, Nebr. (MRO) 21-19, 21-22 West Point Lake, Ga. and Ala. (SAM) (SAS)8-10, 10-26,10-32,10-41 West Richland, Wash. (NPW) 39-14 West Springfield, Mass. (NED) 1-22, 1-44, 1-48 West Stewartstown, N.H. (NED) 1-22 West Tennessee Tributaries, Tenn. (MR+T) 42-8, 42-17, 42-25, 42-49 West Terre Haute, Ind. (ORL) 24-29, 24-34, 24-35 West Thompson lake, Conn. (NED) 1-21, 1-31, 1-46 West Union, W. Va. (ORH) 25-26 West Warren, Mass. (NED) 1-22, 1-44, 1-48 Westchester Creek, N.Y. (NAN) 2-10, 2-25, 2-31, 2-34 Westcott Cove, Conn. (NED) 1-40 Westerly, R.I. (NED) 1-48 Westfield, Mass. (NED) 1-50 Westhaven Cove Small Boat Basin (Westport Marina), (NPS) 38-7, 38-17, 38-22 Westland District Improvement Co., Oreg. (NPP) 37-49 Weston, Vt. (NED) 1-22, 1-44, 1-48 Westport, Conn. (NED) 1-50 Westport, Ky. (ORL) 24-30, 24-36 Westport District, Oreg. (NPP) 37-49 Westport Harbor and Saugatuck River, Conn. (NED) 1-40, 1-50 Westport River, Mass. (NED) 1-40 Westport Slough, Oreg. (NPP) 37-42 Westville Lake, Mass. (NED) 1-22, 1-32, 1-46 Wethersfield, Conn. (NED) 1-22 Weymouth, Mass. (NED) 1-22 Weymouth Back River, Mass. (NED) 1-40 Weymouth-Fore & Town Rivers, Boston Hbr., Mass. (NED) 1-40 Wheeler, General Joe, Lock and Dam, Ala. (ORN) 23-17 Wheeling, W. Va. (ORP) 26-21, 26-25 Wheeling, W. Va. (North Wheeling) (ORP) 26-22, 26-25 Wheeling, W. Va. (Wheeling Island) (ORP) 26-22, 26-25 White Lake Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-79 White Oak Dike, Bladen and Pender Counties, N.C. (SAW) 6-24 White River, Ark. (above Peach Orchard Bluff) (SWL) 18-18 White River, Ark. (below Newport) (LMM) 13-2, 13-6, 13-8 White River, Ind. (ORL) 24-28 White River Basin (Little Rock District) (SWL) 18-3, 18-8, 18-11, 18-19 White River Fish Hatchery, Ark. (SWL) 18-19 Whitebird Creek, Idaho (NPS) 38-13 Whitefish Point Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-36, 31-56, 31-74 Whitesburg, Ky. (ORL) 24-34 Whiting, Maine (NED) 1-22 Whitings Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-26 Whitlow Ranch Dam, (SPL) 33-10, 33-19, 33-23 Whitmanville Lake, Mass. (NED) 1-46, 1-48 Whitney Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-13, 16-16, 16-20 Whitney Point Lake, N.Y. (NAB) 4-16, 4-25, 4-36, 4-37 Whitney Point Village, N.Y. (NAB) 4-16, 4-25, 4-37 Wichita and Valley Center Channel Improvements, Kans. (SWT) 19-26, 19-27 Wickford Harbor, R.I. (NED) 1-40 Wicomico River, Md. (NAB) 4-4, 4-23, 4-30 Wiedmer Chemical Drainage and Levee District, Mo. (LMS) 14-18 Wilcox, Pa. (ORP) 26-25 Wild Rice and Marsh Rivers, Minn. (NCS) 27-19, 27-23 Wild Rice River, Minn. (NCS) 27-20 Wild Rice River, South Branch and Felton Ditch, Minn. (NCS) 27-10, 27-15 Wildcat and San Pablo Creeks, Calif. (SPN) 34-20 Wilders, Ky. (ORL) 24-29 Wiley Creek Lake, Oreg. (NPP) 37-50 Wilkes-Barre, Pa. (NAB) 4-40 Willamette Falls Fish Ladder, Oreg. (NPP) 37-50 Willamette River above Portland and Yamhill River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-10, 37-27, 37-36 Willamette River at Willamette Falls, Oreg. (NPP) 37-12, 37-28, 37-37, 37-41 Willamette River Basin, Oreg. (NPP) 37-14, 37-38, 37-46 Willamette River Basin, Oreg.-Bank Protection (NPP) 37-15, 37-28, 37-38, 37-47 Willamette River Basin Channel Clearing and Snagging (NPP) 37-50 Willapa River and Harbor and Naselle River, Wash. (NPS) 38-7, 38-17, 38-23 Willapa River at Raymond, Wash. (NPS) 38-11, 38-18, 38-24 William H. Harsha Lake, Ohio (ORL) 24-17, 24-21, 24-32 William L. Springer Lake, Ill. (NCR) 28-16 Williamson, W. Va. (ORH) 25-26, 25-28 Williamsport, Pa. (NAB) 4-40 Williamstown, W. Va. (ORH) 25-22, 25-28 Williamsville Reservoir, Vt. (NED) 1-48 Williston, N. Dak. (MRO) 21-18 Williston, N. Dak. Water Intake (MRO) 21-9, 21-13 Willoughby Channel, Va. (NAO) 5-26 Willow Creek Lake, Heppner, Oreg. (NPW) 39-3, 39-9, 39-11 Willow Island Locks and Dam, W. Va. (ORD) 22-1, 22-6 Wilmington Harbor, Del. (NAP) 3-14, 3-23, 3-26 Wilmington Harbor, N.C. (SAW) 6-6, 6-16 Wilmore, Pa. (ORP) 26-25 Wilson Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 32-15, 32-24, 32-36 Wilson Lake, Kans. (MRK) 20-11, 20-16, 20-21 Wilson Lock and Dam, Ala. (ORN) 23-17 Wilson Point Harbor, Conn. (NED) 1-40 Wilton, N.H. (NED) 1-22 Winfield Levee, Kans. (SWT) 19-27 Winfield Levee Modification, Kans. (SWT) 19-27 I-36 INDEX Winnibigoshish Reservoir, Minn. (NCS) 27-17 Winnipesaukee Lake, N.H. (NED) 1-40 Winona, Minn. (NCS) 27-11, 27-15, 27-20 Winona Harbor, Minn. (NCD) 29-9 Winooski River, Vt. (NAN) 2-37 Winslow (Tributaries of Little Colorado River), Ariz. (SPL) 33-29, 33-30 Winsted, Conn. (NED) 1-22, 1-44, 1-48 Winter Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-40 Winter Harbor, Va. (NAO) 5-10, 5-17, 5-21, 5-24 Winthrop Beach, Mass. (NED) 1-42 Winthrop Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-40 Wisconsin River, Wis. (NCS) 27-18 Wishart Point Channel, Va. (NAO) 5-26 Wister Lake, Okla. (SWL) (SWT) 18-16, 19-11, 19-18, 19-22, 19-25 Withlacoochee River, Fla. (SAJ) 9-49, 9-50 Wolf and Jordan Rivers, Miss. (SAM) 10-43 Wolf Creek Dam-Lake Cumberland, Ohio River Basin, Ky. (ORN) 23-9, 23-12 Wolf River (Memphis Harbor), Tenn. (LMM) 13-3, 13-6, 13-8 Wolf-Coffee Lake, Kans. (MRK) 20-23 Wood Island Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-37, 1-40 Wood River Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (LMS) 14-8, 14-12, 14-15 Woodbridge Creek, N.J. (NAN) 2-35 Woodbury Creek, N.J. (NAP) 3-28 Woodcock Creek Lake, Pa. (ORP) 26-11, 26-15 Woodlands, W. Va. (ORP) 26-22, 26-25 Woodmont Shore, Milford, Conn. (NED) 1-42 Woodruff, Jim, Lock and Dam, Ga. and Fla. (SAM) 10-24, 10-32, 10-41 Woods Hole Channel, Mass. (NED) 1-40 Woodson Drainage District, Oreg. (NPP) 37-45, 37-49, 37-50 Woonsocket, R.I. (NED) 1-22, 1-43, 1-48 Worcester, Mass. (NED) 1-22, 1-43, 1-48 Wrangell Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-12 Wrangell Narrows, Alaska (NPA) 40-12 Wright Patman Dam and Lake, Tex. (LMN) (SWF) 11-42, 16-11, 16-16, 16-20 Wright's Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-21 Wrightsville Beach, N.C. (SAW) 6-11, 6-12, 6-17 Wrightsville Dam, Vt. (NAN) 2-37 Wynoochee Lake, Wash. (NPS) 38-12, 38-18, 38-24 Wyoming Valley, Pa. (NAB) 4-18, 4-26, 4-32 Yazoo River Basin, Miss. (MR+T) 42-6, 42-14, 42-25, 42-47 Yazoo River Basin Project Levees (MR+T) 42-42 Yellow Jacket Creek, Hogansville, Ga. (SAM) 10-45 Yellowstone River, Bank Protection, Billings, Mont. (MRO) 21-18 Yellowstone River, Greycliff Bridge, Mont. (MRO) 21-18 Yellowstone River, near Miles City, Mont., Water Intake and Sewage Lagoon (MRO) 21-18 Yellowstone River, Reedpoint Bridge, Mont. (MRO) 21-18 Yellowstone River, Springdale Bridge, Mont. (MRO) 21-18 Yellowstone River, Voges Bridge, near Big Timber, Mont. (MRO) 21-18 Yellowstone River, W. Glendive, Mont. (MRO) 21-22 Yellowstone River, Water Plant, Livingston, Mont. (MRO) 21-18 Yellowstone River, Yellowstone Co. Bridge, near Billings, Mont. (MRO) 21-18 Yonkers, N.Y. (NAN) 2-21, 2-26, 2-32 York, Pa. (NAB) 4-18, 4-26, 4-32 York Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-40 York Spit Channel, Va. (NAO) 5-3, 5-19 Youghiogheny River, Pa. and Md. (ORP) 26-26 Youghiogheny River Lake, Pa. and Md. (ORP) 26-11, 26-15 Youngs Bay and Youngs River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-42 Youngs River Dikes, Oreg. (NPP) 37-49 Youngstown, Ohio (ORP) 26-25 Z Zanesville, Ohio (ORH) 25-22, 25-28 Zintel Canyon Dam, Wash. (NPW) 39-15 Zippel Bay, Minn. (NCS) 27-18 Zippel Bay Harbor, Minn. (NCS) 27-18 Zumbro River, Minn. (NCS) 27-20, 27-21 Zumbro River, Minn. (NCS) 27-20, 27-21 Yadkin River, N.C. (SAN) 7-17, 7-18 Yadkin River Basin, N.C. & S.C. (SAW) 6-11, 6-23 Yakima, Wash. (NPS) 38-29 Yakima River, West Richland, Wash. (NPW) 39-15 Yakima River at Ellensburg, Wash. (NPS) 38-28 Yakima River, West Richland, Wash. (NPW) 39-15 Yalobusha River, Miss. (LMK) 12-11 Yaquina Bay and Harbor, Oreg. (NPP) 37-11, 37-27, 37-36 Yaquina Bay and Harbor Small Boat Basin, Oreg. (NPP) 37-42 Yaquina River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-, 37-28, 37-37, 37-42 Yatesville Lake, Ky. (ORH) 25-12, 25-19 Yazoo City, Miss. (MR+T) 42-8 Yazoo River, Miss. (LMK) 12-3, 12-6, 12-8 Yazoo River Backwater Area (MR+T) 42-47 * U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE : 1982 0 - 377-609 : QL 3 I-37 R�i + _ _ r .. _ -' ,. . ,! . - i n ull lili:'II I i l i; l a i j,' i F ?. ' .... - .. . (), \ Y { ! .? } ).. . ;Y/ 4 , ., .- , - k w ;x~ , r - #. .. _ .. ', ,< t"^ , gat''